UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

[X]ANNUAL REPORT UNDERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021
  
For the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2018
[  ]TRANSITION REPORT UNDERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  
For the transition period from _________ to ________
  
Commission file number:000-53498001-39187

 

CleanSpark, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


 

Nevada87-0449945
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  

70 North Main Street, Ste. 1052370 Corporate Circle, Suite 160

Bountiful, UtahHenderson, Nevada

 

 8401089074

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’sRegistrants telephone number:number, including area code: (801) 244-4405(702)941-8047

Securities registered under

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

 

Title of each class

Trading

Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange

on which registered

NoneNot applicable

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Title of each class

Common Stock, $.001 par value $0.001 per share

 
CLSK The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: N/A

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be

submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405(232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

1
Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

[  ] Large accelerated filerFiler[  ] Accelerated filerFiler
[  ] ☐ Non-accelerated filerFiler[X] Smaller reporting company
[  ] Emerging growth company

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of

the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State theThe aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equitystock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of theMarch 31, 2021 (the last business day of the registrant’sregistrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $25,096,771quarter), was approximately $702,832,610 based on the per share closing price as of March 31, 2021 quoted on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the registrant’s common stock, which was $23.89.

 

Indicate the numberAs of shares outstandingDecember 14, 2021, there were 41,447,776 shares of eachcommon stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Certain portions of the registrant’s classesdefinitive proxy statement to be delivered to its shareholders in connection with the registrant’s 2022 Annual Meeting of common stock, asShareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the latest practicable date. 39,740,596 shares as of January 9, 2018fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

1
Table of Contents

CLEANSPARK, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended

September 30, 2021

Page 
PART I
Item 1.Business4
Item 1A.Risk Factors11
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments32
Item 2.Properties32
Item 3.Legal Proceedings33
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures33
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities34
Item 6.[Reserved]34
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations35
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk42
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data42
Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure43
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures43
Item 9B.Other Information45
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance45
Item 11.Executive Compensation45
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters45
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence45
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services45
PART IV
Item 15.Exhibit and Financial Statement Schedules46

 2 
Table of Contents 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 TABLE OF CONTENTSThis Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements may include terminology such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “continue,” “could,” “due,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “objective,” “plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “positioned,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “would,” and other similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and future trends, or the negative of these terms or comparable terminations. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding future operating results, potential risks pertaining to these future operating results, future plans or prospects, anticipated benefits of proposed (or future) acquisitions, dispositions and new facilities, growth, the capabilities and capacities of business operations, any financial or other guidance, expected capital expenditures and all statements that are not based on historical fact, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about our business and the industry in which we operate, as well as the economy, trends and other future conditions, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to changes based on various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Therefore, we can give no assurance that the results implied by these forward-looking statements will be realized. Furthermore, the inclusion of forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that future events, plans or expectations contemplated by the Company will be achieved. The following important factors, among others, could affect future results and events, causing those results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements:

 
Page
PART I
Item 1.Business4
Item 1A.Risk Factors12
Item 2.Properties19
Item 3.Legal Proceedings20
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosure20
PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity

·our ability to achieve profitability, and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

20
Item 6.Selected Financial Data25
Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations25
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk28
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data28
Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure29
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures29
Item 9B.Other Information30
PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance30
Item 11.Executive Compensation33
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters35
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence37
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services37to maintain profitability, in the future;

 
PART IV

·high volatility in the value attributable to our business;

 

·the rapidly changing regulatory and legal environment in which we operate, may lead to unknown future challenges to operating our business or which may subject our business to added costs and/or uncertainty regarding the ability to operate;

Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

·our ability to keep pace with technology changes and competitive conditions;

38

·our ability to execute on our business strategy; and

·other risks and uncertainties related to our business plan and business strategy.

 

For a further list and description of various risks, factors and uncertainties that could cause future results or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our forward-looking statements, see the Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations sections contained in this document, and any subsequent reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Given these risks and uncertainties, the reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and we do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or correct any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that subsequently occur, or of which we hereafter become aware. You should read this document completely and with the understanding that our actual future results or events may be materially different from what we expect. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

Information regarding market and industry statistics contained in this report is included based on information available to us that we believe is accurate. It is generally based on industry and other publications that are not produced for purposes of securities filings or economic analysis. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and the additional uncertainties accompanying any estimates of future market size, revenue and market acceptance of products and services. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

 

 3 
Table of Contents 

PART I

 

Item 1. Business

 

Our BusinessAs used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” “CleanSpark, Inc.” and “CleanSpark” mean CleanSpark, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.

Overview 

CleanSpark, Inc. is a leading bitcoin mining and diversified energy company incorporated in Nevada, whose common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. We sustainably mine bitcoin; we also provide advanced energy technology solutions to commercial and residential customers to solve modern energy challenges. The Company, through itself and its wholly owned subsidiaries, has operated in the digital currency mining sector since December 2020, and in the alternative energy sector since March 2014.

 

We are currently working with industry leaders and other advisors in developing a long-term sustainability and clean energy plan. We are also using all available clean and renewable energy resources that we currently have reasonable access to in all of our bitcoin mining locations in order to further support our sustainability efforts.

Lines of Business

Digital Currency Mining Segment

Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, ATL Data Centers LLC (“ATL”) and CleanBlok, Inc. (“CleanBlok”), we mine bitcoin. We entered the bitcoin mining industry through our acquisition of ATL in December 2020. We acquired a second data center in August 2021 and have had a co-location agreement with New York-based Coinmint in place since July 2021. Bitcoin mining has now become our principal revenue generating business activity. We currently intend to continue to acquire additional facilities, equipment and infrastructure capacity to continue to expand our bitcoin mining operations.

Bitcoin was introduced in 2008 with the goal of serving as a digital means of exchanging and storing value. Bitcoin is a form of digital currency that depends upon a consensus-based network and a public ledger called a “blockchain,” which contains a record of every bitcoin transaction ever processed. The bitcoin network is the first decentralized peer-to-peer payment network, powered by users participating in the consensus protocol, with no central authority or middlemen, that has wide network participation. The authenticity of each bitcoin transaction is protected through digital signatures that correspond with addresses of users that send and receive bitcoin. Users have full control over remitting bitcoin from their own sending addresses. All transactions on the bitcoin blockchain are transparent, allowing those running the appropriate software to confirm the validity of each transaction. To be recorded on the blockchain, each bitcoin transaction is validated through a proof-of-work consensus method, which entails solving complex mathematical problems to validate transactions and post them on the blockchain. This process is called mining. Miners are rewarded with bitcoins, both in the form of newly-created bitcoins and fees in bitcoin, for successfully solving the mathematical problems and providing computing power to the network.

Factors such as access to computer processing capacity, interconnectivity, electricity cost, environmental factors (such as cooling capacity) and location play important roles in mining. As of the date of this filing, our mining units are currently capable of producing over 1.3 exahash/s (“EH”) in hash rate capacity. In cryptocurrency mining, “hash rate” is a measure of the processing capacity and speed by which a mining computer mines and processes transactions on the bitcoin network. Our activities in this area are complemented by our energy background and planning is underway to deploy our portfolio of energy technologies to advance our bitcoin mining business, with the goal of maximizing energy savings, increasing total power capacity, providing advancedresilient electricity, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. We are expanding our bitcoin mining business with the goal of reaching 2.0 EH/s in hashrate capacity at or near the end of December 31, 2021. We expect to exceed 3 EH/s in capacity by mid-to-late 2022. Hash rate capacity is one of the most important metrics for evaluating bitcoin mining companies.

We obtain bitcoin as a result of our mining operations; while we retain a significant portion of the bitcoin, we have sold, and intend to sell bitcoin from time to time, to support our operations and strategic growth. We do not currently plan to engage in regular trading of bitcoin (other than as necessary to convert our bitcoin to U.S. dollars) or to engage in hedging activities related to our holding of bitcoin; however, our decisions to hold or sell bitcoin at any given time may be impacted by the bitcoin market, which has been historically characterized by significant volatility. Currently, we do not use a formula or specific methodology to determine whether or when we will sell bitcoin that we hold, or the number of bitcoins we will sell. Rather, decisions to hold or sell bitcoins are currently determined by analyzing forecasts and monitoring the market in real time.

4
Table of Contents

Through our recently formed wholly owned subsidiaries, CSRE Properties, LLC, CSRE Property Management Company LLC, and CSRE Properties Norcross, LLC, we maintain real property holdings for ATL and CleanBlok.

Energy Segment

We provide energy softwaresolutions through our wholly-owned subsidiaries CleanSpark, LLC, CleanSpark Critical Power Systems, Inc., GridFabric, LLC, and control technology that enables a plug-and-play enterprise solution to modern energy challenges. Our servicesSolar Watt Solutions, Inc. These solutions consist of intelligent energy monitoring and controls, microgridengineering, design and engineering,software solutions, custom hardware solutions, Open Automated Demand response (“OpenADR”), solar, energy storage for microgrid consulting services, and turn-keydistributed energy systems to military, commercial and residential customers in Southern California and through the world.

Our solutions are supported by our proprietary suite of software platforms (collectively, the “Platforms”) that include microgrid implementation services. Our software allows energy usersmodeling, energy market communications and energy management solutions as summarized below:

·mPulse and mVoult: Patented, proprietary controls platforms that enable integration and optimization of multiple energy sources.

·Canvas: Middleware used by grid operators and aggregators to administrate load shifting programs.

·Plaid: Middleware used by controls and IoT (internet-of-things) product companies to participate in load shifting programs.

·mVSO: Energy modeling software for internal microgrid design .

The Platforms were developed to obtainenable the designing, building, and operating of distributed energy systems and microgrids which efficiently manage energy assets. These strategies are generally targeted to achieve resiliency and economic optimization. Our software is uniquely capable of enabling a microgrid to be scaled to the user's specific needs and can be widely implemented across commercial, industrial, military and municipal deployment.

Integral to our business is our mPulse and mVSO software platforms (the “Platforms”). When the Platforms are implemented on a customer’s power system they are able to control the distributed energy resources on site to provide secure, sustainable energy often at significant cost savings for our energy customers. The Platforms allows customers to efficiently manage renewable energy generation, other distributed energy generation technologies including energy generation assets, energy storage assets, and energy consumption assets. By having autonomous control over the distributed facets of energy usage and energy storage, customers are able to reduce their dependency on utilities, thereby keeping energy costs relatively constant over time. The overall aim is to transform energy consumers into energy producers by supplying power that anticipates their routine instead of interrupting it.

 

We also own patented gasification energy technologies. Our technology converts any organic material into SynGas. SynGassynthesis gas, which can be used as clean, renewable, environmentally friendly, warming fuel for power plants, motor vehicles,a variety of applications and as feedstock for the generation of DME (Di-Methyl Ether).

As previously disclosed, we currently plan to continue ourto focus on the CleanSpark side of the business in 2019, as opposed to expending significant efforts on the Gasifier side of the business. We plan to continue our efforts to better our technology, service existing customers and market our System (defined below) to prospective clients. We feel that this focus would provide the best opportunity for our shareholders.other offerings.

 

Our Distributed Energy Management BusinessOther business activities

 

IntegralThrough p2kLabs, Inc., we provide design, software development, and other technology-based consulting services. The services provided are generally hourly or fixed-fee project-based arrangements.

Through ATL, we also provide traditional data center services, such as providing customers with rack space, power and equipment, and offer several cloud services including virtual services, virtual storage, and data backup services.

Markets, Geography and Major Customers 

Digital Currency Mining Segment

Bitcoin is a global store and exchange of value used by people across the world as an asset and to conduct daily transactions. Mining bitcoin supports the global bitcoin blockchain and the millions of people that depend on it for economic security and other benefits. Strictly speaking, there is no customer market for mining bitcoin but we consider our business ismining pool operators as customers because they compensate us for providing processing power to the mining pool (see Item 1A. Risk Factors for more information on our Distributed Energy Management Business (the “DER Business”)mining pool operators). The main assetsWe own and operate our own facilities and do not lease mining space to other mining companies or private individuals that mine. Our wholly-owned mining operations are located in the State of Georgia in the United States. We also have a relationship with a facility located in New York State that hosts a portion of our DER Business include our propriety software systems (“Systems”) and also our engineering and methodology trade secrets. The Distributed miners.

Energy systems and Microgrids that utilize our Systems are capable of providing secure, sustainable energy with significant cost savings for its energy customers. The Systems allows customers to design, engineer, construct and then efficiently manage renewable energy generation, storage and consumption. By having autonomous control over the multiple facets of energy usage and storage, customers are able to reduce their dependency on utilities, thereby keeping energy costs relatively constant over time. The overall aim is to transform energy consumers into intelligent energy producers by supplying and managing power in a manner that anticipates their routine instead of interrupting it.Segment

 

Around the world, thean aging gridenergy infrastructure is becoming unstable and unreliable due to increases in loads and lack oflimited new, large-scale generation facilities. This inherent instability is compounded by the push to integrate a growing number and variety of renewable but intermittent energy generatorsgeneration assets and advanced technologies into outdated electrical grid systems. Simultaneously, defenseDefense installations, industrial complexes, communities, campuses and campusesother aggregators across the world are turning to virtual power plants and microgrids as a means to decrease their reliance fromon the grid, reduce utility costs, utilize cleaner power, and enhance energy security and surety.

The convergence of these factors is creating a “perfect storm” in the power supply optimization and energy management arena. Efficiently building and operating the distributed energy management systems and microgrids of tomorrow, while maximizing the use of sustainable energy to produce affordable, stable, predictable, and reliable power on a large scale, is a significant opportunity that first-movers can leverage to capture a large share of this emerging global industry.

A microgrid is comprised if any number of generation, energy storage, and smart distribution assets that serve a single or multiple loads, both connected to the utility grid and separate from the utility grid “islanded.” In the past, distributed

4
Table of Contents

energy management systems and microgrids have consisted or off-grid generators organized with controls to provide power where utility lines cannot run. Today, modern distributed energy management systems and microgrids integrate renewable energy generation systems (REGS) with advanced energy storage devices and interoperate with the local utility grid. Advanced autonomous cyber-secure microgrids controls relay information between intelligent hardware and localized servers to make decisions in real-time that deliver optimum power where it is needed, when it is needed.

Our Systems create an integrated distributed energy management control platform that seamlessly integrates all forms of energy generation with energy storage devices and controls facility loads to provide energy security in real time free of cyber threats. Able to interoperate with the local utility grid, the Systems bring users the ability to choose when to buy or sell power to and from the grid, enabling what we believe is the most cost effective power solution that exists on the current market.

Our Systems are ideal for commercial, industrial, mining, defense, campus and residential users and ranges in size from 4KW to 100MW and beyond and can deliver power at or below the current cost of utility power.

Our services consist of turn-key distributed energy and microgrid implementation services, distributed energy microgrid system design and engineering, project development consulting services and solar photovoltaic installation and consulting. The work is performed under fixed price bid contracts, and negotiated price contracts.

mPulse Software Suite

mPulse is a modular platform that enables fine-grained control of a Microgrid based on customer operational goals, equipment and forecasts of load and generation. mPulse performs high-frequency calculations, threshold-based alarming, execution of domain-specific business rules, internal and external health monitoring, historical data persistence, and system-to-operator notifications. The modular design increases system flexibility and extensibility. In addition, the deployment of the mPulse system follows a security-conscious posture by deploying hardware-based firewalls as well as encryption across communication channels. mPulse allows configuration for site-specific equipment and operation and provides a clean, informative user interface to allow customers to monitor and analyze the data streams that describe how their microgrid is operating.

mPulse supports our innovative fractal approach to microgrid design, which enables multiple microgrids on a single site to interact in a number of different ways, including as peers, in a parent-child relationship, and in parallel or completely disconnected. Each grid can have different operational objectives, and those operational objectives can change over time. Any microgrid can be islanded from the rest of the microgrid as well as the larger utility grid. The mPulse software can control the workflow required in both the islanding steps as well as the reconnecting steps of this maneuver and coordinate connected equipment such that connections are only made when it is safe to do so. The mPulse software has proven to be robust and reliable, operating successfully at the Camp Pendleton FractalGrid installation continuously for over 3 years with minimal maintenance and support required.

Microgrid Value Stream Optimizer (mVSO)

The Microgrid Value Stream Optimizer(mVSO)tool provides a robust distributed energy and microgrid system modeling solution. mVSO takes utility rate data and load data for a customer site and helps automate the sizing and analysis of potential microgrid solutions as well as providing a financial analysis around each grid configuration. mVSO uses historical weather data to generate projected energy generation from PV arrays and models how storage responds to varying operational modes and command logics based upon predicted generation and load curves. mVSO analysis multiple equipment combinations and operation situation to determine the optimal configuration for a site based on the financials, equipment outlay, utility cost savings, etc., to arrive at payback and IRR values. This ultimately provides the user with data to design a distributed energy and/or microgrid system that will meet the customers’ performance benchmarks.

Version 2.0 improvements

On September 27, 2017, we launched the development of mPulse 2.0 and mVSO 2.0. These improvements are being built into our existing software platforms and add significant improvements, which focus on positioning, integration, focus and quality, as outlined below.security.

 

 5 
Table of Contents 

 

Positioning

When mPulse originally was developed, a main focus ofThe Company’s products and services predominantly serve the platform andenergy markets throughout the industry was resiliency of microgrid operation, specificallyAmericas in military contexts. Since that time, the microgrid landscape has continued to evolve, and there is growing opportunity within theresidential, commercial, and industrial spacesectors. Federal, state and local governmental bodies provide incentives to owners and system integrators of solar energy systems to promote renewable energy in the form of rebates, tax credits, and other similar incentives. These incentives help to catalyze customer acceptance of renewable energy systems as an alternative to utility-provided power. Over the most recent year, our energy business operated extensively in California’s residential energy markets by participating in these spaces desire microgrids capable of obtaining the highest economic advantage.state’s Self-Generation Incentive Program (“SGIP”).

 

Further, this growing focusFor the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, 61.2% and 64.8% of our total energy revenues were associated primarily with three customers. A loss or decline in business with these customers could have an adverse impact on economic advantage isour business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We provide our hardware products under manufacturing and distribution agreements. We provide our software and services at customer locations and from our office located in line with the continued market evolution toward an open energy market at regional levels. We want to be well positioned to enter into this market at each step of its availability, from responding to demand response requests all the way through participating in ancillary grid service markets and fully open transactive energy markets as regulation matures. To position ourselves, the mPulse platform operation is being improved to mirror the predicted energy market progression by implementing internal markets at each level of the system. In these internal markets, energy producing assets are modeled as sellers, and energy consuming assets are modeled as buyers, with the market playing matchmaker between the two and virtually “selling” available energy to the highest bidder, thereby satisfying the energy loads at the highest economic advantage for both participants at any given moment.Carlsbad, California.

Working Capital Items

Digital Currency Mining Segment

 

The internal energy market running at our customers’ sites will take daily feeds of productionbitcoin mining industry is highly competitive and load forecasts from the platform to set up the daily market parameters, then ingest a stream of current positions of both buyersdependent on specialized mining machines that have few manufacturers. Machine purchases require large down payments and sellers as well as their individual pricing information, which is calculated based on the details of the energy rate under which those consumers operate. Consumers bid into the market along the schedule of the specific rate structure under which those loads operate, with bids including the calculated value of energy and power based on that rate and the predicted total use and power profile duringminer deliveries often arrive many months after initial orders are placed.

At the time period of that bid. Based on the predicted generation profileCompany acquired ATL in December 2020, the Company had approximately 3,471 bitcoin mining units with application-specific integrated circuits (“ASICs”) in operation, which produced approximately 190 petahash/s. Since acquiring ATL, the Company has expanded its operations and the other active bids currently being satisfied, the market either fills or cannot fill the newly received bid, and based on the market’s feedback, the consumer’s operation mode and setpoint will change, which will determine the actual control commands sent to related equipment.

This market scenario is mirrored at every level, from an individual node potentially consisting of only one producer and one consumer (power source and meter, respectively), to a higher-level node, in which other nodes participate purchased additional ASICs. The Company now has 12,900 ASICs(as either net producers or net consumers, to the site level, and even up to regional level, where sites may participate in the market directly. At each level, details of the level below are aggregated and abstracted away, so each level operates in a simple and self-similar way, mirroring the physical construction of the FractalGrid. These markets shine in optimization scenarios, especially around times of just enough supply or even slight scarcity, which are expected to allow us to reap the maximum economic value for our customers even in the case of undersized grids. In addition, this flexibility allows for ease of integration for new market participants at each level as regulation matures to support further Demand Response programs, ancillary service markets, and eventually peer-to-peer transactive energy.

Focus

For mPulse 2.0, we are focusing on furthering the development of the economic optimization logic in the platform, including an increased push toward deep learning algorithms and more effective forecasting both on solar generation and facility load.

Quality

We employ a quality-first mindset in all aspects of our software design. From a software architecture point of view, this translates in designing for the maintainability, extensibility, scalability, availability, accessibility, and deployability of the system.

These planned improvements paired with our design and engineering methods and experience are intended to help keep us on the leading edge of the microgrid industry. As of the date of this filing)in daily operation, which are producing approximately 1.3 EH/s. In addition to the ASICs in operation, the Company has also entered into futures contracts, pursuant to which it has pre-paid significant down payments to acquire additional mining machines. The majority of miners we have offered a beta releaseoperate and expect to operate once received are the latest generation Antminers manufactured by Bitmain, including the S19, S19-Pro, and S19j-Pro. We believe that Bitmain’s miners are the most efficient and productive miners currently on the market, though that may change as new manufacturers enter the market.

In addition to our currently deployed fleet of mPulse 2.0 to a limited number of customers and we are testing system performance with these customers as feature sets are released of the next two quarters. We plan to make a full release of mPulse to all customers in the first quarter of 2019. Asapproximately 12,900 latest-generation miners (as of the date of this filing,filing), we intend to release VSO 2.0 to customers inhave purchased an additional 26,830 miners that are slated for delivery over the second quarternext 12 months. With the full deployment of 2019.these miners, our total fleet will consist of approximately 38,610 miners.

 

Energy Segment

We currently possess a significant amount of inventory, however, our short-term demand currently exceeds our current inventory levels. We are actively working with our current suppliers to satisfy our short-term and anticipated long-term needs. Due to current supply chain dynamics worldwide constraining our ability to secure certain inventory, these constraints have resulting in a significant customer backlog.

Distribution, Marketing and Strategic Relationships

Digital Currency Mining Segment

We have developed strategic relationships with well-established companies in key areas including traditional and renewable energy, infrastructure, and bitcoin mining equipment procurement.

 6 
Table of Contents 

 

We were granted

Coinmint

In addition to operating our own mining facilities, we may engage with third-parties to operate mining equipment on behalf of the Company. On July 8, 2021, CleanBlok entered into a new United States Patentsservices agreement with Coinmint, LLC (“Coinmint”). Pursuant to the agreement, Coinmint has agreed to house and power certain of our cryptocurrency mining equipment in its facilities, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to mine bitcoin on April 10, 2018 protecting our software systems.behalf. All bitcoin mining services performed by Coinmint are conducted using mining equipment owned by the Company. As of the date of this filing, we have received and deployed approximately 6,700 total miners pursuant to the co-location mining services agreement at Coinmint’s facility in New York.

Pursuant to the agreement, as consideration for the services, we pay Coinmint certain services fees, which are based on the operating costs incurred by Coinmint in performing the services, and a variable fee calculated based on the profitability of the bitcoin mined during the relevant payment period, subject to uptime performance commitments. The patent, "Establishing Communication and Power Sharing Links Between Componentsagreement has an initial term of a Distributed Energy System, US 9,941, 696 B2," is a patent that specifically addresses our engineering and data-analytics technologies, processes and procedures.  The patent covers our ability to receive data from a plurality of sources within a microgrid,one year, after which is then analyzed to forecast power needs across the microgrid, or a combination of multiple 'fractal' microgrids, and then determining whether or when to share powerit will renew automatically for three-month periods until terminated in accordance with the requesting module.terms of the agreement.

 

MicroGrid Development ProjectsEnergy Segment

The

We have developed strategic relationships with well-established companies in key areas including distribution and manufacturing. We sell our products worldwide, with a primary focus on Southern California Energy Commission awardedand the Americas, through our direct product sales force, and partner networks.

Materials and Suppliers

Digital Currency Mining Segment

We engage in high efficiency bitcoin mining by using ASICs. These specialized computers, often called mining rigs, have few manufacturers. A majority of the machines we purchased this year were manufactured by Bitmain, a grantChinese company and the preeminent manufacturer of bitcoin mining rigs.

In addition to Harper Construction Company, Inc.ASICS, mining equipment includes networking equipment, power cords, racking, other specialized storage, transformers, and energy. We rely on utility providers for our power needs. These utilities buy into local energy mixes to source power. We make every effort to establish our facilities in July 2013locations serviced by utilities that generate a substantial portion of their energy from clean and renewable sources. We supplement the energy mix provided by our partners with the purchase of renewable energy credits because the precise ratio of renewable energy in local energy mixes is not within our control. We also intend to supportgenerate a portion of our own power through renewable solar energy by installing our microgrid technology demonstration project. We were subcontractedsolutions at our mining centers.

Historically, we have been able to provided design, development, integration,manage our supply chains effectively, but global supply chains are highly constrained, and installation services for the FractalGrid at the Schoolwe are experiencing substantial increases in shipping costs and unprecedented logistical delays as we make efforts to ensure timely delivery of Infantryequipment. There can be no certainty that we will not be affected in the 52 Area of Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The Project was subsequently transferredfuture, and we believe that there is significant risk that equipment supply chains will be affected in 2022. Inflationary pressures may also impact our fiscal year 2022.

Energy Segment

Although most components essential to our energy business are generally available from multiple sources, we believe there are component suppliers and manufacturing vendors whose loss to us could have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition. The Company also currently engages a contract manufacturer, whereby they exclusively manufacture parallel switchgear, automatic transfer switches and related control and circuit protective equipment for consideration and an agreement to indemnify Harper Construction for all future responsibilities of maintenance, operations and warranty.

us. The project included integration of our proprietary software and controls platform withCompany sources energy storage devices (batteries) from a variety of energy storage technologies. The system utilizes solar energy generated by pre-existing existing fixed-tilt solar photovoltaic panelsvendors based on availability, cost, and fifteen dual axis tracking concentrated photovoltaic units. Our distributed controls combinequality. If we fail to maintain or expand our relationships with our suppliers and manufacturers, or if one or more that we rely upon to meet anticipated demand reduces or ceases production, it may be difficult to quickly identify and qualify alternatives on acceptable terms. In addition, equipment prices may increase in the generation with energy storage technologies to create four separate microgrids that self-align together to create a larger microgrid that ties directly into the larger utility gridcoming years, or not decrease at the 12kV level, allowing the baserates we historically have experienced, due to consume energy from the most reliable, affordable source at any given time. The system provides a 100% renewable and sustainable solution to energy security.

In the event of an outagetariffs or other energy surety threat, the software can autonomously separate the microgrids from the utility and the controls operate them independently in “island” mode, without interrupting service to critical circuits. Once energy from the grid is stabilized, our platform reconnects the microgrid to the utility. Each individual fractal microgrid can work independently or in concert as the larger 1.1MW FractalGrid, sharing data and energy throughout the group to improve efficiency, protect critical circuits, manage supply and demand, and allow for maintenance or repairs, as needed. The entire installation provides the Marine Corps and Department of the Navy with reliable energy security with built in cyber defense.

In May of 2017 we completed the first and second stages of a contract for $75,000 for engineering and design and $60,000 for optimization and control logic development. In July of 2017, we were awarded the contract to construct the Microgrid we designed. The $900,000 sub-contract awarded by Bethel-Webcor JV is to install a turn-key advanced microgrid system at the U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The contract is in direct support of the United States Department of Navy's communication information system (CIS) operations complex that was recently awarded to the Joint-Venture.

The Company begin on-site work for this project in February of 2018 and expects to complete its scope of work in early 2019.

In May of 2017, we were able to engineer, design and install a fully off-grid, triple-redundant power system at a private, residential estate in Southern California.

On October 2, 2018, we executed a Profession Services Agreement with Macerich to perform engineering, design and consultation services and follow-on construction work to install a Microgrid designed by our engineering team which utilized our mVSO software in creating the system design. The system will be controlled by our mPulse controller upon completion. The microgrid is expected to be located at Macerich’s Thousand Oaks facility in California.

The Agreement provides that we will be compensated in stages, and each stage requires that Macerich provide written authorization to proceed. The agreement further requires that an additional Design Build Contract be executed for the construction portion of the project. At this time this agreement only specifically authorizes an initial $88,250 for consultation and engineering services, the balance of the $18 million microgrid installation contract falls under later stages. These additional stages require Macerich’s written authorization to proceed with the overall project. This amount may be subject to further adjustment if the customer requires a change in scope prior to providing written authorization to proceed with construction. A change in scope could be triggered by a variety of reasons not limited to permitting restrictions, utility restrictions and other unforeseen circumstances. We expect to receive written permission to proceed on all stages of the contract in the first quarter of 2019.

These projects are examples of the far reaching capabilities of our System and the variety of applications that are available as plug and play solutions. We are pursuing additional microgrid projects and anticipate executing on the projects being pursued in 2019 and 2020. There is no assurances, however, that we will obtain contracts to sustain our operations.factors.  

 

 7 
Table of Contents 

 

Acquisitions

In 2021, we experienced periodic supply chain constraints around certain inventory items, most notably battery energy supply systems. Global supply chains are highly constrained, and unprecedented logistical delays have the potential to impact our abilities timely delivery of equipment. There can be no certainty that we will not be affected in the future, and we believe that there is significant risk that equipment supply chains will be affected in 2022. Inflationary pressures may also impact our fiscal year 2022.

 

As an

Environmental Issues

Digital Currency Mining and Energy Segments

No significant pollution or other types of hazardous emission result from the Company’s direct operations and it is not anticipated that our operations will be materially affected by federal, state or local provisions concerning environmental controls. Our costs of complying with environmental, health and safety requirements have not been material. Starting in the fourth calendar quarter of 2021, we began to voluntarily purchase renewable energy technology company, partcredits to offset a significant portion of our business modelenergy usage that is derived from non-renewable sources. The Company has also engaged market professionals to assess our technologies, product offeringsenhance and business directionbuild a comprehensive environmental, social and determine whether any strategic acquisitions would benefit us.

As previously disclosed, on May 2, 2018, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”governance (“ESG”) with Pioneer Custom Electric Products Corp., a Delaware corporation.

On December 27, 2018, the parties to the Purchase Agreement entered into a letter amendment (the “Amendment”) to extend the Termination Date from December 31, 2018 until on or before January 16, 2019. Under the Amendment, the parties agreed that, in addition to the other Closing conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, the obligation of the Company to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, is subject to Bank of Montreal releasing any Liens it holds on the Acquired Assets. The parties further agreed that they are entering into the extension to, amongst other things, allow the parties sufficient time to negotiate amendments to the business terms and structure of the transactions set forth in the Purchase Agreement.strategy.

 

We do not believe that existing or pending climate change legislation, regulation, or international treaties or accords are still in discussions and negotiations with Pioneer, and we planreasonably likely to disclose the final business arrangementhave a material effect in the coming days.foreseeable future on our business or markets that we serve, nor on our results of operations, capital expenditures or financial position.  We continue to monitor emerging developments in this area.

  

Our Gasifier BusinessCompetition

 

IntegralDigital Currency Mining Segment

Bitcoin mining is a global activity. During our most recent fiscal year, a majority of bitcoin mining occurred in China. After China banned bitcoin mining in May 2021, the center of mining moved to North America. Although bitcoin mining by its nature is not a directly competitive business, all miners compete for bitcoin rewards; based on this, we define competitors as other bitcoin miners. Our competitors include large, publicly-listed mining companies, large private mining companies, and, in some cases, independent, individual miners who pool resources. We believe our existingprincipal competitive factors include our energy technology background, a combination of owned, operated, and co-located miners and facilities, our strategic use of the bitcoin we mine to fund growth, and our commitment to sustainable business is the Gasifier. We own Patent Nos. 9,890,340B2, 9,359,567, 8,518,133 8,105,401 and 8,347,829 protectingpractices, including sourcing renewable energy. Within North America, our gasification technology and process for using feedstock comprising gaseous fuel. Our technology converts any organic material into SynGas. SynGas can be used as clean, renewable, environmentally friendly, warming fuel for power plants, motor vehicles, and as feedstock for the generation of DME (Di-Methyl Ether). DME is the premier energy carrier and offers a range of important benefits:major competitors include:

 

§1)Simple and low cost of productionMarathon Digital Holdings
§2)An environmentally-benign propellant and coolantRiot Blockchain, Inc.
§3)Clean-burning and high energy efficiencyGreenidge Generation Holdings
§4)Lower transportation and distribution costsBit Digital, Inc.
§5)Easily converted into other fuels and chemicals

Our Gasifier converts the following materials into clean, reusable, renewable, and affordable energy:

§Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)Hut 8 Mining Corp.
§6)Municipal sewage sludgeHive Blockchain Technologies
§7)Food and cooking wasteCompute North
§8)Petroleum sludge and oily wastesCore Scientific
§9)Animal manures
§Cellulosic and non-cellulosic biomass
§Energy crops
§Scrap tires
§CoalBitfarms LTD.

 

The process involvesIn addition to the grinding, drying, separating, mixing,foregoing, we compete with other companies that focus all or a portion of their activities on mining activities at scale. We face significant competition in certain operational aspects of our business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, obtaining the lowest cost of electricity, obtaining clean energy sources, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and then pelletizing of solid waste. These pellets constituteevaluating new technology developments in the feedstock for the Gasifier. Gasifying the pellets produces SynGas. SynGas can be converted into multiple forms of energy including motor vehicle and jet fuels. The SynGas produced is so clean that it generally does not require hot-gas cleanup. SynGas is mostly hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide are primary building blocks for fuels and chemicals. SynGas is a clean burning fuel suitable for use in duel-fuel diesel engines, gas turbines, and steam boilers.industry.

 

We believe thatEnergy Segment

The markets we address in our processenergy operations are characterized by the presence of both new start-ups and well-established product providers. This industry is capablecapital intensive and highly competitive. The ability to compete effectively is determined by product features, scalability, relative price, lifetime operating cost, product durability and reliability, safety, ease of turn the world’s waste problem into an abundant, renewable resource of energy. Our production can be adapted to the specific energy requirements of a given area. Communities are expected to benefit from the countless options created including inexpensive green electric power for homes, clean-burning fuel for garbage trucks, street maintenance equipment, or for resale to other municipalities. Because of the modular nature of the components intrinsic to the process, the plant could provide one energy source, then be converted to provide a different energy product. Our facility could produce additional electric power during the peak demand part of the dayintegration, customer support, design innovation, marketing and produce fuels during the rest of the day.distribution capability, service and support and corporate reputation.

 8 
Table of Contents 

 

We offer turnkey energy solutions which include system design, installation and grid integration. Our market segmentation is vast as wePlatforms are capable of interoperating with the local utility grid to help users optimize power for their homes or businesses. Our solutions are vendor agnostic. Our solutions are ideal for commercial, industrial, mining, defense, campus and community users, both small and large, with an aim to deliver power at or below the customers cost of utility power. These attributes contribute to our ability to compete with larger, more established competitors. Our major competitors include:

1)Schneider Electric
2)Siemens
3)Spirae
4)Ageto Energy
5)PowerSecure
6)ABB
7)Homer
8)Tesla

Intellectual Property 

Digital Currency Mining Segment

We do not currently own any patents in connection with our existing and planned digital currency mining related operations. We do rely, and expect to applycontinue relying, upon trade secrets, trademarks, service marks, trade names, copyrights and other intellectual property rights.

Energy Segment

In relation to our technology microgrid business, we own the following patent: Patent No. 9,941,696 B2 “Establishing Communication and Power Sharing Links Between Components of a Distributed Energy System,” awarded April 10, 2018, which addresses our engineering and data-analytics technologies, processes and procedures. The patent covers our ability to anything that receive data from a plurality of sources within a microgrid, which is carbon based. The marketsthen analyzed to forecast power needs across the microgrid, or a combination of multiple 'fractal' microgrids, and then determining whether or when to share power with the requesting module.

In relation to our legacy gasifier business, we own the following patents: Patent No. 9,359,567 “Gasification Method Using Feedstock Comprising Gaseous Fuels;” Patent No. 8,518,133 “Parallel Path, Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method;” Patent No. 8,105,401 “Parallel Path, Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method;” Patent No. 8,347,829 “Electrolytic Reactor and Related Methods for which we have focusedSupplementing the Air Intake of an Internal Combustion Engine.” Another patent, "Parallel Path Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method, US 9,890, 340 B2," awarded February 13, 2018, further enhanced our efforts include: the electric utility market, municipal waste, processing plants, the refining sector, stranded natural gas fields,patent portfolio surrounding our proprietary gasification and Canadian oil sands.waste-to-energy technologies. Our patents begin to expire between 2028 and 2035.

Government Regulation

Digital Currency Mining and Energy Segments

 

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. It is anticipated that, absent the occurrence of an extraordinary event, compliance with existing federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations concerning the protection of the environment and human health will not have begun pursuing opportunities a material effect upon us, our capital expenditures, or earnings. We cannot predict the effects of any additional regulation or legislation, enforcement policies thereunder and claims for damages for injuries to utilize property, employees, other persons and the assets and intellectual properties purchased. We aim to further develop these technologies in order to pursue licensing, manufacturing and direct sales agreements forenvironment resulting from our Gasifier technology.

 

The technologies and prototype will need to undergo additional clinical lab testing to further establish its capability of producing large volumes of clean, renewable energy from any carbon compound (Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Coal, Sewage Sludge) into clean Synthesis Gas. Our Gasifier is still under development and a commercially viable Gasifier is not expected to be sellable until we are able to expend additional resources on its testing and development. In December of 2014, we executed an agreement with a third party to independently test our production model prototype. Combustion was engaged to independently test the Gasifer's performance and certify the results of its performance. Combustion Resources completed the initial stages of testing. Upon completion of the testing an initial white paper was published outlining the results and suggested improvements. We anticipate that the cost to complete these improvements will be between $250,000 and $500,000. Upon completion of the improvement we will conduct an extended test run with an independent third party. We believe the results of these independent tests will provide the results needed to prove its commercial viability, at which time we would begin to actively market our Gasifier units.

We have not engaged in any significant negotiations to sell our Gasifier products to any major customers. Once completed, we intend to distribute our products through advertisements and sales calls on potential customers with demonstrations of how the products work.

Competition

We face significant competition in the alternative energy and microgrid markets. Some of our competitors have substantially larger financial and other resources. Factors that affect our ability to further test a commercially viable Gasifier and upgrade our System include resource limitations, available information and our standards established for projected return on investment.

Integral to our business is its Distributed Energy Management Business (the “DER Business”), the main assets of our DER Business include our propriety software systems (“Systems”) and also our engineering and methodology trade secrets. The Distributed Energy systems and Microgrids that utilize our Systems are capable of providing secure, sustainable energy with significant cost savings for its energy customers. The Systems allows customers to design, engineer, construct and then efficiently manage renewable energy generation, storage and consumption. By having autonomous control over the multiple facets of energy usage and storage, customers are able to reduce their dependency on utilities, thereby keeping energy costs relatively constant over time. The overall aim is to transform energy consumers into intelligent energy producers by supplying and managing power in a manner that anticipates their routine instead of interrupting it.

Distributed Energy Management Business Competition

Our DER Business and software platforms are set up to compete against larger companies. Our integrated microgrid control platform seamlessly integrates energy generation with energy storage devices and controls facility loads to provide energy security in real time. The systems are able to interoperate with the local utility grid and allows users the ability to obtain the most cost-effective power for a facility. The systems are technology agnostic and can incorporate into multiple vendors and manufacturers products and legacy systems. The systems are ideal for commercial, industrial, mining, defense, campus and community users ranging from 4 kw to 100 MW and beyond and can deliver power at or below the current cost of utility power. All of these attributes contribute to our ability to compete with the larger, more established competitors that have rely on their own manufactured products and hardware solutions.

 9 
Table of Contents 

Distributed Energy and Microgrid control technologies are new to the market and can be deployed in various formats. Eight technologies that are predominantly used in commercial applications and/or have been extensively studied are:

§Virdity (Control Platform)
§Lotus (Power monitoring)
§GridBridge (Power monitoring)
§Schnider (Intelligence and automation)
§Spirae (Intelligence and automation and Project Proposal Tool)
§Energy Toolbase (Project Proposal Tool)
§Homer (Project Proposal Tool)
§Growing Energy Labs Inc. (Modeling and Control)

These current technologies of our competitors have a number of inherent problems:

§Operational sensitivity to specific hardware solutions potentially increasing the cost of implementations.
§Non-automated systems require constant monitoring increasing operating costs.

The principal advantages of our System are:

§Technology agnostic approach allows customers to leverage aged legacy systems reducing implementation costs.
§The automated process is user friendly and does not require highly qualified engineers to operate.
§We believe our project proposal tool is more accurate than any other option on the market.

Gasifier business competition

Our Gasifier system is set up to compete against larger gasification projects. Our modular concept allows for parallel processing so a facility could be easily expanded or reduced without risk or changing the basic structure by simply adding or removing module units; it also allows for multiple end product processing, producing electricity, ethanol, and fuels simultaneously, and for universal parts which reduces maintenance costs. This design factor solves repair and maintenance problems by simply shutting down the unit(s) to be repaired and bringing the reserve unit(s) online. All of these attributes contribute to our ability to compete with the larger, more established competitors that have large systems that require significant downtime for maintenance and repair.

 

Gasification technologies can incorporate any one of a number of Gasifiers. Eight gasification technologies that are predominantly used in commercial applications and/or have been extensively studied are:

§Texaco Entrained Flow (Downflow) Gasifier
§E-Gas Entrained Flow (Upflow) Gasifier
§Shell Entrained Flow (Upflow) Gasifier
§KRW Fluidized-Bed Gasifier
§Kellogg Transport Reactor Gasifier
§Lurgi Dry Ash Gasifier
§British Gas/Lurgi Fixed Bed Gasifier
§Plasma Gasification

These current technologies of our competitors have a number of inherent problems:

§Large footprint plants and high operating costs.
§Operational sensitivity to properties of different feedstock especially moisture content.
§Tendency to caking and bridging.
§Produces a dirty gas, expensive to clean or only suitable for low efficiency conversion in a steam-boiler turbine generator (10% electrical efficiency).
§Inefficient usage of created energy to power plasma conversion.

10
Table of Contents

The principal advantages of our Gasifier are:

§Modular concept allows for parallel processing so a facility could be easily expanded or reduced without risk or changing the basic structure by simply adding or removing module units; it also allows for multiple end product processing, producing electricity, ethanol, and fuels simultaneously, and for universal parts, which reduces maintenance costs.
§The one stage process is very simple and does not require highly qualified engineers to operate because of the automation.
§The direct heat transfer of the gases to the material being gasified is efficient, and as a natural consequence of the process, the product gas is stripped of its impurities, eliminating the costly hot gas clean up associated with other Gasifiers.
§Pollutant absorbing binder aids in efficiency, cracking hydrocarbons acting as a catalyst, and absorbs the pollutants, oxidizes carbon eliminating water vapor and all but 5 – 10% carbon dioxide, which in the Company’s estimation will eliminate the need for carbon sequestration.
§Ash by product makes an excellent road and cement aggregate.
§Process is nearly 100% environmentally friendly.
§Any and all liquid and solid organic wastes can be utilized and disposed of, producing no residual wastes.

Intellectual Property

In relation to our Gasifier business, we own the following patents: Patent No. 9,359,567 ‘Gasification Method Using Feedstock Comprising Gaseous Fuels’; Patent No. 8,518,133 ‘Parallel Path, Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method’; and Patent No. 8,105,401 ‘Parallel Path, Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method.’ ; Patent No. 8,347,829 Electrolytic Reactor and Related Methods for Supplementing the Air Intake of an Internal Combustion Engine

In relation to our microgrid business, we own the following patents: Patent No. 9,941,696 B2 "Establishing Communication and Power Sharing Links Between Components of a Distributed Energy System, awarded April 10, 2018, is a revolutionary patent that specifically addresses CleanSpark's engineering and data-analytics technologies, processes and procedures. The patent covers CleanSpark's ability to 'receive data from a plurality of sources within a microgrid, which is then analyzed to forecast power needs across the microgrid, or a combination of multiple 'fractal' microgrids, and then determining whether or when to share power with the requesting module.

The second Patent, "Parallel Path Downdraft Gasifier Apparatus and Method, US 9,890, 340 B2", awarded February 13, 2018, further enhances CleanSpark's patent portfolio surrounding its proprietary gasification and waste-to-energy technologies.

Government Regulation

We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. It is anticipated that, absent the occurrence of an extraordinary event, compliance with existing federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations concerning the protection of the environment and human health will not have a material effect upon us, our capital expenditures, or earnings. We cannot predict what effect additional regulation or legislation, enforcement policies thereunder and claims for damages for injuries to property, employees, other persons and the environment resulting from our operations. Our operations are subject to environmental regulation by state and federal authorities including the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”EPA). This regulation has not increased the cost of planning, designing and operating to date. Although we believe that compliance with environmental regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our operations or results of these operations, there can be no assurance that significant costs and liabilities, including criminal or civil penalties, will not be incurred. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, including stricter environmental laws and regulations, and claims for damages for injuries to property or persons resulting from our activities could result in substantial costs andliabilities.

 

In the conduct of our activities, our operations will be subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”(OSHA) and comparable state statutes. The OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act and similar state statutes require us to organize information about hazardous materials used, released or produced in itsour operations. Certain of this information must be provided to employees, state and local governmental authorities and local citizens. We are also subject to the requirements and reporting set forth in OSHA workplace standards.

 

11
Table of Contents

Blockchain technologies and digital currencies, including bitcoin, are increasingly becoming subject to governmental regulation, both in the U.S. and internationally. Blockchain technologies and cryptocurrency are under review with a number of U.S. governmental agencies, including, without limitation, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Federal Trade Commission and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.State and local regulations also may apply to our digital currency mining. Other governmental or quasi-governmental regulatory bodies have shown an interest in regulating or investigating companies engaged in digital currency related business. For instance, the Cyber-Digital Task Force of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) published a report entitled “Cryptocurrency: An Enforcement Framework” in October 2020. This report provides a comprehensive overview of the possible threats and enforcement challenges the DOJ views as associated with the use and prevalence of digital currencies, amongst other things. Further, in early March 2021, the SEC chairperson nominee expressed an intent to focus on investor protection issues raised by cryptocurrencies.

Presently, we do not believe any U.S. or State regulatory body has taken any action or position adverse to our digital currency mining activities; however, future changes to existing regulations or entirely new regulations may affect our business in ways it is not presently possible for us to predict with any reasonable degree of reliability.

In addition, regulators and the media have expressed concerns related to the potential environmental impacts of bitcoin mining, and its energy-intensive nature in particular. We are not materially impacted by any current regulations targeted toward the digital currency mining industry.

 

Other than the above regulations and maintaining our good standing in the State of Nevada,states in which we operate, complying with applicable local business licensing requirements, complying with all state and federal tax requirements, preparing our periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and complying with other applicable securities laws, rules, and regulations, we do not believe that existing or probably governmental regulations will have a material effect on our operations. Certain governmental and quasi-governmental bodies are considering additional regulations in the bitcoin mining and energy industries; it is not currently known whether any such regulations would have a material impact on our businesses. We do not currently require the approval of any governmental agency or affiliated program for our operations.

 

Employees, ConsultantsIn the future we may become subject to new laws and/or regulations, such as further regulation by the SEC and Contractorsother agencies, which may affect our digital currency mining and other activities. For additional discussion regarding our belief about the potential risks existing and future regulation pose to our business, see the Section entitled “Risk Factors,” below.

Product Development

Digital Currency Mining and Energy Segments

Because the distributed energy and related software industry is still in a relatively early state of adoption, our ability to compete successfully is heavily dependent upon our ability to ensure a continual and timely flow of competitive products, services, and technologies to the marketplace. We continue to enhance our existing products in order to drive further commercialization. We may also expand the range of our product offerings and intellectual property through licensing and/or acquisition of third-party business and technology.

Bitcoin mining by its nature has no products.

10
Table of Contents

Human Capital Resources; Employees; Personnel

Digital Currency Mining and Energy Segments 

 

We currently have 7 employees,believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, hire, and also contract the servicesretain qualified personnel. As of consultantsDecember 1, 2021, we had 87 staff members, 86 of which were full time. Employees participate in equity incentive plans and receive generous compensation in the various areasform of expertise as required. The waysalary and benefits. We continually seek to hire and retain talented professionals, although the competition for such personnel in which our business currently operatessegments is as follows:significant. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we have never experienced a work stoppage.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer, S. Matthew Schultz, currently manages our day-to-day operations. He is responsible for the negotiation of contracts, oversees the design, marketing and implementation of the products and processes, and manages licenses, patents, and other intangible assets. In addition to daily management tasks, Mr. Schultz also researches financing and potential investors.Company Websites

 

Our CFO, Zachary K. Bradford, is responsibleWe maintain a corporate website at: www.cleanspark.com and informational websites for implementing our strategic goalssubsidiaries at www.cleanblok.com, www.gridfabric.io, and objectives. He is also in charge of managing our financial risks, financial planning, accounting records, SEC filings, reviewing financial data, reporting financial performance, preparing budgets, and monitoring expenditures and costs.

Our COO, Bryan Huber, is responsible for implementing and overseeing our general operations and research and development activities. In addition, he is responsible for determining the feasibility and marketability of our technology and future technologies that we may acquire.www.p2klabs.com.

 

The amountcontents of time devotedthese websites are not incorporated in, or otherwise to us currently by officers may be limited by the resources we have available. However, we feel the time devoted to operations is enough to cover our current operational requirements.regarded as part of, this Annual Report.

 

We file reports with the SEC, which are available on our website free of charge. These reports include annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 filings on Form 3, Form 4, and Form 5, and other related filings, each of which is provided on our website as soon as reasonably practical after we electronically file such materials with or furnish them to the SEC. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, including the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

We are subject to various risks that may materially harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. An investment in our common stock is speculative and involves a high degree of risk. In evaluating an investment in shares of our common stock, you should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information included in this report.Annual Report.

 

The risks described below are not the only risks we face. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occurs, or if additional risks and uncertainties later materialize, that are not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, then our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment in our shares. The risks discussed below include forward-looking statements, and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Risk Factors Summary

 

Risks Related to Our BusinessBelow is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below and should be carefully considered, together with other information included in this Annual Report.

·risks arising from pandemics, epidemics or an outbreak of diseases, such as the recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic;
·supply chain and shipping disruptions have resulted in shipping delays, a significant increase in lead times and shipping costs, and could increase product costs and result in lost sales and bitcoin production;
·our limited operating history and history of operating losses and negative cash flow;
·volatile and unpredictable cycles in the emerging and evolving industries in which we operate;
·competition in the markets in which we operate;
·our reliance on intellectual property rights to protect our technology;
·our ability to manage our suppliers and contract manufacturers;

11
Table of Contents

 

We lack an established operating history and have incurred losses in prior periods, expect to incur losses in the future and we can give no assurance that our operations will result in profits.

·our relationships with certain key customers;
·our limited experience selling our distributed energy focus products and solutions for use in residential markets;
·the concentration of our solar energy business in Southern California;
·potential product defect or liability suits, or any recall of our products;
·our reliance on our management team, and any failure by management to properly manage growth;
·future strategic acquisitions and other arrangements that we engage in, which could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders, reduce our financial resources and harm our operating results;
·our substantial dependency on utility rate structures and government incentive programs that encourage the use of alternative energy sources;
·our need for financing in the future to sustain and expand our operations and any inability to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all;
·potential changes in laws and regulations applicable to digital currencies, or interpretations thereof, including, without limitation, banking regulations and securities regulations and regulations governing mining activities, both in the U.S. and in other countries;
·the uncertain impact of geopolitical and economic events on the demand for bitcoin;
·our exposure to pricing risk and volatility associated with the value of bitcoin because we do not hedge our investment in bitcoin;
·the development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies;
·challenges of scaling bitcoin, which, if not overcome, may lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times;
·the reward for successfully solving a block will halve in the future and its value may not adjust to compensate us for the reduction in the rewards we receive from our mining efforts;
·potential actions of malicious actors or botnets;
·our reliance on a third-party mining pool service provider for our mining revenue payouts;
·loss, theft or restriction on access to bitcoins and other digital assets we hold;
·the loss or destruction of private keys required to access our bitcoins and potential data loss relating to our bitcoins;
·the irreversibility of incorrect or fraudulent bitcoin transactions;
·forks in the bitcoin network;
·the open-source structure of the bitcoin network protocol and any failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol;
·the possibility that banks and financial institutions may not provide services to businesses that engage in cryptocurrency-related activities;
·potential exposure to specifically designated nationals or blocked persons as a result of our interactions with the bitcoin network;
·the relative novelty and lack of regulation of the digital asset exchanges on which cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, trade;
·inadequate sources of recovery if our digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed;
·the lack of limitations of FDIC or SIPC protections for the assets we hold;
·the possible failure to comply with internal control over financial reporting requirements under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
·the limited rights of legal recourse available to us following any loss of our bitcoins;
·the possibility that a cryptocurrency other than bitcoin could be more desirable to the digital asset user base;
·the possibility that our mining costs may exceed our mining revenues;
·damage of the properties included in our mining operation and inability to get adequate insurance coverage for same;
·our need for significant electrical power to support our mining operations;
·competition from other methods of investing in cryptocurrencies;
·the possibility that operators of bitcoins mining operations may immediately sell bitcoin rewards earned by mining in the market, thereby constraining the growth of the price of bitcoin;
·risks related to technological obsolescence, the vulnerability of the global supply chain for cryptocurrency hardware disruption, and difficulty in obtaining new hardware;
·the possible transition of bitcoin mining algorithms to proof of stake validation;
·potential Internet disruptions;

 

We have a limited operating history that makes it difficult to evaluate our business. Historical sales pertaining to our System have been in low volume, and we cannot say with certainty when we will begin to achieve profitability. We have not sold any of our Gasifiers.

Since inception, we have sustained $66,939,531 in cumulative net losses and we had a net loss for the year ended September 30, 2018 of $47,006,165. We expect to have operating losses at least until such time as we have developed asubstantial and stable revenue base. We cannot assure you that we can develop a substantial and stable revenue base or achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future.

 12 
Table of Contents 

·the limited precedent for financial accounting of digital assets, and the possibility of future accounting requirements for transactions involving digital assets;
·future developments regarding the treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income and applicable state, local and non-U.S. tax purposes;
·the price of our common stock may be volatile and could fluctuate widely in price;
·any future issuance of preferred stock may adversely affect holders of our common stock, as shares of preferred stock may have additional rights, preferences and privileges as compared to the common stock;
·we have not, and do not intend to, pay dividends on shares of our common stock;
·if securities or industry analysts do not publish or do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline; and
·Provisions in the Nevada Revised Statutes and our Bylaws could make it very difficult for an investor to bring any legal actions against our directors or officers for violations of their fiduciary duties or could require us to pay any amounts incurred by our directors or officers in any such actions.

Risks Related to Our Business

 

AlthoughOur business has been, and in the future may be, subject to risks arising from pandemic, epidemic, or an outbreak of diseases, such as the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak to be a pandemic. Since then, COVID-19 has spread across the globe and is impacting worldwide economic activity, including through quarantines, travel bans and restrictions, shelter-in-place orders, shutdowns of businesses, reductions in business activity, supply chain interruptions and overall economic and financial market instability. These measures have impacted, and may further impact, our workforce and operations, as well as the operations of our customers, our partners and our vendors and suppliers. Our critical business operations, including our headquarters, and many of our key suppliers, are located in regions which have been and continue to be impacted by COVID-19. Our customers and suppliers worldwide have also been affected by COVID-19 and may continue to experience material impacts well beyond the end of the pandemic.

Specifically, the manufacture of components of our products, the final assembly of our products, and other critical operations are concentrated in certain geographic locations that have been impacted by COVID-19 and in which local governments continue to take measures to try to contain the pandemic. There is considerable uncertainty regarding the impact of such measures and potential future measures, including restrictions on manufacturing facilities, on our support operations or workforce, or on our customers, partners, vendors and suppliers. Such measures, as well as restrictions on or disruptions of transportation, such as reduced availability or increased cost of air transport, port closures, and increased border controls or closures, could limit our capacity to meet customer demand and have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The COVID-19 pandemic and other factors have adversely affected our supply chain, consistent with its effect across many industries, including creating shipping and logistics challenges and placing significant limits on component supplies. These effects on our supply chain have resulted in delayed product availability in our energy business, especially when combined with the demand for our products, and have adversely impacted, and may continue to adversely impact, our ability to meet our energy product demand, result in additional costs, or may otherwise adversely impact our business and results of operations. They have also significantly increased the costs of shipping miners, related components and infrastructure. We expect these impacts, including delayed product availability, to continue for as long as the global supply chain is experiencing these challenges.

The spread of COVID-19 has also caused us to modify our business practices as we comply with state-mandated requirements for safety in the workplace to ensure the health, safety, and welling-being of our employees. While the company has implemented a Vaccination and Testing Policy, we still maintain other measures including personal protective equipment, social distancing, cleanliness of our facilities, and daily monitoring of the health of employees in our facilities, as well as modifying our policies on employee travel and the cancellation of physical participation in meetings,

13
Table of Contents

events, and conferences. We may take further actions in response to the pandemic as may be required by government authorities or that we may determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers, partners, and suppliers. However, we have obtained sufficient funding fornot developed a specific and comprehensive contingency plan designed to address the year ending September 30, 2019,challenges and risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic and, even if and when we do not obtain increased revenues in 2019, we may have to scale back or cease our activities or seek additional financing, which may significantly harm our chances of success.

Because we have generated onlydevelop such a small amount of revenue in prior years and currently operate at a significant loss, we are dependent on generating additional revenue in the coming year or we may need to seek the continued availability of financing in order to continue our business. Thereplan, there can be no assurance that our revenues will develop as planned or that financing sufficient to enable us to continue our operationssuch plan will be availableeffective in mitigating the potential adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, while the extent and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy and our business in particular are difficult to assess or predict, the pandemic has resulted in, and may continue to result in, significant disruption of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital or our customers’ ability to pay us for past or future purchases, which could negatively affect our working capital and liquidity. A recession or financial market correction resulting from the lack of containment and spread of COVID-19 could impact overall spending, adversely affecting demand for our products and services, our business, and the value of our common stock.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or a similar health epidemic is highly uncertain and subject to change. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance, including our ability to execute our business strategies and initiatives in the expected time frame, will depend on future developments, including, but not limited to, the duration and continued spread of the pandemic, its severity, further related restrictions on travel, any reopening plans, the effectiveness of actions taken in the United States and other countries to contain and treat the disease, including, without limitation, the effectiveness and timing of vaccination initiatives in the United States and worldwide and the duration, timing, and severity of the impact on customer spending, including any recession resulting from the pandemic, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. An extended period of global supply chain and economic disruption as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, even after the pandemic subsides, could have a materially adverse impact on our business, results of operations, access to sources of capital and financial condition, though the full extent and duration of any such impact is also uncertain.

Supply chain and shipping disruptions have resulted in shipping delays, a significant increase in shipping costs, and could increase product costs and result in lost sales, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Supply chain disruptions, resulting from factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, labor supply and shipping container shortages, have impacted, and may continue to impact, us and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers. These disruptions have resulted in longer lead times and increased product costs and shipping expenses, including with respect to the delivery of miners that we have purchased. While we have taken steps to minimize the impact of these increased costs by working closely with our suppliers and customers, there can be no assurances that unforeseen events impacting the supply chain will not have a material adverse effect on us in the future. Moreover, even if weAdditionally, the impacts supply chain disruptions have on our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are ablenot within our control. It is not currently possible to obtain financingpredict how long it will take for these supply chain disruptions to cease. Prolonged supply chain disruptions impacting us and our third-party manufacturers and suppliers could interrupt product manufacturing, increased lead times, increased product costs and result in lost sales and bitcoin production, result in a delay in the future, it could be on termsdelivery of miners that causes our company’s stock pricewe have purchased, and continue to suffer or further dilutes shareholder interests in our company. Mostincrease shipping costs associated with the delivery of our financing in 2018 was from the issuancepurchased miners, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We have a limited operating history and a history of convertible notes along with some funding from the sale of our common stockoperating losses and related party advances. We obtained approximately $5,000,000 in connection with the sale of a secured convertible promissory note. While this financing is expected to carry us through 2019, our failure to obtain future financing, financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or to produce levels of revenue to meet our financial needs could result in our inability to continue as a going concernnegative cash flow, and as a result, our investors could lose their entire investment. In order to maximize our potential for success, we need to generate cashflows from revenues totaling $2,000,000 to $4,000,000 to support our current operations or we may need a similar amount in additional financing in 2020. As explained in this annual report, these cashflows are needed for continued upgradesnever achieve consistent profitability.

Our limited operating history, including our recent entry into the digital currency mining business, makes it difficult to our software, testing and refinement of our Gasifier, marketing and sales of both sides ofevaluate our business operations and predict our future results of operations. Although we have achieved profitable quarters in the past, to date, we have not maintained consistent profitability from period to period, and no assurances can be made that we will achieve consistent profitability in the near future, if ever. From the Company’s inception through September 30, 2021, we sustained $138,392,118 in cumulative net losses, and we had a net loss for working capital.the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 of $21,812,010. We have generated these losses as we attempt to implement our business plan, including expanding our existing products and customer base. We will not achieve consistent profitability unless and until we can develop a substantial and stable revenue base.

14
Table of Contents

Our future success is difficult to predict because we operate in emerging and evolving markets, and the industries in which we competethat are subject to volatile and unpredictable cycles.

The renewable energy, bitcoin mining, microgrid and related industries are emerging and evolving, markets which may lead to period-to-period variability in our operating results and may make it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and which may lead to period to period variability in our operating results.prospects. Our energy products and services are based on unique technology whichthat we believe offers significant advantages to our customers, but the markets we serve are in a relatively early stage of development and it is uncertain how rapidly they will develop. It is also uncertain whether our energy products will achieve high levels of demand and acceptance as these markets grow. If companies and customers in the industries we serve do not perceive or value the benefits of our technologies and products, or if they are unwilling to adopt our products as alternatives to traditional power solutions, the market for our products and services may not develop or may develop more slowly than we expect, which could significantly and adversely impact our operating results.

 

As a supplier to the renewable energy, microgrid and related industries, we may be subject to business cycles. Thecycles, the timing, length, and volatility of these business cycleswhich may be difficult to predict. These industriesThe cyclical nature of our business may be cyclical due todriven by sudden changes in customers’ manufacturing capacity requirements and spending, which depend in part on capacity utilization, demand for customers’ products, inventory levels relative to demand and access to affordable capital. These changes may affect the timing and amounts of customers’ purchases and investments in technology, and affect our orders, net sales, operating expenses, and net income. In addition, we may not be able to respond adequately or quickly to theany declines in demand by reducing our costs.

To meet rapidly changing demand in each of the industries we serve, we must effectively manage our resources and production capacity. During periods of decreasing demand for our products, we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with prevailing market conditions, effectively manage our supply chain, and motivate and retain key employees. During periods of increasing demand for our products, we must have sufficient inventory to fulfill customer orders, effectively manage our supply chain, and attract, retain, and motivate a sufficient number of qualified individuals. If we are not able to timely and appropriately adapt to changes in our business environment or to accurately assess where we are positioned within a business cycle, our business, financial condition, or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

The industriesmarkets in which we competeparticipate are highly competitive, and we may be unable to successfully compete to survive.compete.

 

13
Table of Contents

We compete in the highly competitive market for renewable energy products and microgrid technology and associated services that is intensely competitive., as well as in certain operational aspects of our digital currency mining business, including, but not limited to, the acquisition of new miners, obtaining the lowest cost of electricity, obtaining clean energy sources, obtaining access to energy sites with reliable sources of power, and evaluating new technology developments in the industry. Evolving industry standards, rapid price changes and product obsolescence also impact the market.market and its various participants, including us. Our competitors include many domestic and foreign companies, mostmany of which have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do.do, which may cause us to be at a competitive disadvantage. Our current competitors or new market entrants could introduce new or enhanced technologies, products or services with features that render our technologies, products or services obsolete, less competitive or less marketable. Our The success of our energy business will be dependent upon our ability to develop products that are superior to existing products and products introduced in the future, and which are cost effective. In addition, we may be required to continually enhance any products that are developed as well as introduce new products that keep pace with technological change and address the increasingly sophisticated needs of the marketplace. Even if our current technologies prove to be commercially feasible, there is extensive research and development being conducted on alternative energy sources that may render our technologies and protocols obsolete or otherwise non-competitive. The success of our digital currency mining business will be further dependent upon our ability to purchase additional miners, adapt to changes in technology in the industry, and to obtain sufficient energy at reasonable prices, amongst other things.

 

There canWe may also be no assurance that we will be ableunable to keep pace with the technological demands of the marketplace or successfully develop products that will succeed in the marketplace. As a small company, we will be at a competitive disadvantage to mostSince many of our competitors which includeare larger, establishedwell-established companies that have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, distribution and other resources than us. There can be no assurance thatus, we willare at an inherent competitive disadvantage. We may not have the capital resources available to undertake the research that may be necessary to upgrade our equipment or develop new devices to meet the efficiencies of changing technologies. Our inability to adapt to technological change could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations.

To date we have had only sixteen customers for our Microgrid services and System and none for our Gasifiers so we cannot assure you that our customer base will increase.

We had revenue from fourteen customers in our fiscal year ending September 30, 2018. We cannot assure you that our customer base will expand or that any decline in net revenue attributable to customer losses will be replaced in a timely manner. If we fail to commercialize our products and services and increase our customer base, our business will fail.

Product development is an inherently uncertain process, and we may encounter unanticipated development challenges and may not be able to meet our product development and commercialization milestones.

Product development and testing may be subject to unanticipated and significant delays, expenses and technical or other problems. We cannot guarantee that we will successfully achieve our milestones within our planned timeframe or ever. We develop prototypes of planned products prior to the full commercialization of these products. We cannot predict whether prototypes of future products will achieve results consistent with our expectations. A prototype could cost significantly more than expected or the prototype design and construction process could uncover problems that are not consistent with our expectations. Prototypes of emerging products are a material part of our business plan, and if they are not proven to be successful, our business and prospects could be harmed.

More generally, the commercialization of our products may also be adversely affected by many factors not within our control, including:

§15the willingness of market participants to try a new product and the perceptions of these market participants of the safety, reliability, functionality and cost effectiveness of our products;
§the emergenceTable of newer, possibly more effective technologies;Contents
§the future cost and availability of the raw materials and components needed to manufacture and use our products; and
§the adoption of new regulatory or industry standards that may adversely affect the use or cost of our products.

Accordingly, we cannot predict that our products will be accepted on a scale sufficient to support development of mass markets for them.

We rely on patents and proprietarya variety of intellectual property rights to protect our technology, and enforcing those rights could disrupt our business operation and divert precious resources that could ultimately harm our future prospects.

 

We rely on a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and procedures and patents to protect our proprietary technologies. We own patent numbers 8,518,133

Our business primarily relies upon trade secret laws and 8,105,401 ‘Parallel Path, Downdraft Gasifier Apparatuscontractual restrictions, such as confidentiality agreements and Method'’work-for-hire provisions, to protect our technology, know-how and patent number 9,359,567 ‘Gasification Method Using Feedstock Comprising Gaseous Fuel’– which coversother proprietary information. It may be cost prohibitive for us to seek to enforce such rights through the legal-enforcement mechanisms available to us, and, in any case, such laws and contractual restrictions may not provide meaningful protection to us against the possible unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets.

In relation to our Gasifier technology. Wemicrogrid business, we also own patent number 8,342,829 entitled ‘Electrolytic Reactorpatents that protect our ability to receive data from a plurality of sources within a microgrid, which is then analyzed to forecast power needs across the microgrid, or a combination of multiple ‘fractal’ microgrids, and Related Methods for Supplementingthen determine whether or when to share power with the Air Intake of an Internal Combustion Engine.’

14
Table of Contents

requesting module. The claims contained in those and any patentother patents we own may not provide adequate protection for our products and technology. In the absence of patent protection, weour competitors may be vulnerable to competitors who attempt to copy our products or gain access to our trade secrets and know-how. In addition, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to thisour technology to the same extent as the laws of the U.S.

 

In addition, our ongoing expansion of our business, including, in particular, through the development of products, may result in claims of intellectual property infringement, regardless of merit. If aan infringement claim or other dispute arises concerning our technology, we could become involved in litigation that might involve substantial cost. Litigation could divert substantial management attention away from our operations and into efforts to enforce our patents, protect our trade secrets or know-how or determine the scope of the proprietary rights of others. If a proceeding resulted in adverse findings, we could be subject to significant liabilities to third parties. Weparties, and we might also be required to seek licenses from third parties to manufacture or sell our products. Our ability to manufacture and sell our products may also be adversely affected by other unforeseen factors relating to theany such proceeding or its outcome.

 

As we continue to grow and to develop our intellectual property, we could attract threats from patent monetization firms or competitors alleging infringement of intellectual property rights.

Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. If we do not prevail in this type of litigation, we may be required to: pay monetary damages; stop commercial activities relating to our product; obtain one or more licenses in order to secure the rights to continue manufacturing or marketing certain products; or attempt to compete in the market with substantially similar products. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could limit our ability to continue some of our operations.

A materialsignificant part of our success will depend on our ability to manage our suppliers and contract manufacturers. Ourmanufacturers, and any failure to manage our suppliers and contract manufacturersdo so could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and relations with our customers.

 

We rely upon a limited number of suppliers to provide the components necessary to build our energy products and on contract manufacturers to procure components and assemble our products. In addition, we rely on a limited number of suppliers for the purchase and delivery of our miners to support our digital currency mining operations. There can be no assurance that such key suppliers and contract manufacturers will provide components, products or products miners in a timely and cost efficientcost-efficient manner or otherwise meet our needs and expectations. Any disruption in such key suppliers’ or contract manufacturers could delay our ability to provide our products to our customers or to expand our digital currency mining operations. Our ability to manage such relationships and timely replace suppliers and contract manufacturers, if necessary, is critical to our success. Our failure to timely replace our contract manufacturers and suppliers, should that become necessary, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and relations with our customers. For example, we depend on Bitmain for the majority of our mining rigs and Pioneer Custom Electrical Products Corp. as a sole source contract manufacturer of our switchgear product lines, and any change in their ability to manufacture and deliver these products could have a significant impact on our results of operations.

 

Our success is dependent upon our relationships with certain key customers.

In the past, we have derived a significant portion of our revenues from a relatively limited number of customers. Our dependence on a limited number of customers may continue in the future. The loss of any one of our major customers or decrease in demand by those customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, our results of operations and our cash flows.

16
Table of Contents

We have limited experience selling our distributed energy focused products and solutions for use in residential markets, and our increased efforts in this regard may not be as successful as we expect or at all.

As a result of our recent acquisition of Solar Watt, we now are providing solar and alternative energy solutions for homeowners, as well as commercial businesses, and have developed a proprietary platform to enable integration and optimization of solar, energy storage and back-up solutions for residential applications. Historically, however, our products and solutions have been primarily sold into commercial and governmental markets. We have limited experience pursuing the residential markets, and there are unique challenges associated with sales to homeowners and others in the residential market. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in growing profitably (or at all) sales of our residential market focused products and solutions or otherwise achieving success in our efforts in this regard. Further, the success of these efforts will depend on part on expansion of homeowner use of solar energy. To date, solar energy has only achieved limited market acceptance (particularly in regions outside of Southern California, in which regions we intend to expand our services and capabilities), and its continued market acceptance and growth may depend on continued support in the form of performance-based incentives, rebates, tax credits and other incentives from federal, state, local and foreign governments. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop our planned proprietary platform to enable integration and optimization of solar, energy storage and back-up generators for residential applications.

Our solar energy business is concentrated in Southern California, putting us at risk of region-specific disruptions.

Our solar energy customer base is currently concentrated in Southern California, and we expect many of our future solar energy installations to be in California, which could further concentrate our solar energy customer base and operational infrastructure. Accordingly, our business and results of operations are particularly susceptible to adverse economic, regulatory, political, weather and other conditions in California, including the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and any legislative changes related to grid operations.

If we are the subject of future product defect or liability suits, or our products are subject to a recall, our business will likely fail.and our reputation could be adversely affected.

 

In the course of our planned operations, we may become subject to legal actions based on a claim that our energy products are defective in workmanship or have caused personal or other injuries. We currently maintain liability insurance but there canmay also be no guarantee that such coverage may not be adequate to cover all potential claims. Moreover, even if we are able to maintain sufficient insurance coverage in the future, any successful claim could significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be exposedsubject to lawsuits and other claims in the future if our products malfunction, which could increase our expenses, harm our reputation and prevent us from growing our business.

Any liabilityincluding, for damages resulting from malfunctionsexample, if any of our solar service offerings (such as our racking systems, photovoltaic modules, batteries, inverters, or other products) causes injuries. Because solar energy systems and many of our other current and anticipated products are electricity-producing devices, it is possible that customers or their property could be substantial, increase our expenses and prevent us from growinginjured or continuing our business. Potential customers may rely ondamaged by our products, for critical needs and a malfunction of our products could result in warranty claimswhether due to product malfunctions, defects, improper installation or other product liability. In addition, a well-publicized actual or perceived problem could adversely affect the market’s perception of our products. This could result in a decline in demand for our products, which would reduce revenue and harm our business.causes. Further, since our products are used in systems that are made up onof components made by othersourced from third party manufacturers, we may be subject to product liability claims even if our products do not malfunction. Additionally, any of our products could be subject to recalls due to product malfunctions or defects.

 

The successful assertion of product liability claims against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages that could require us to make significant payments, as well as subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position and adversely affect sales of our systems and other products. We rely on third-party manufacturing warranties, warranties provided by our manufacturing partners and our general liability insurance to cover product liability claims and have not obtained separate product liability insurance. Such warranties and insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover all potential claims. Moreover, even if such warranties and insurance coverage are sufficient, any successful claim could significantly harm our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, product liability claims, injuries, defects or other problems experienced by other companies in the industries in which we operate could lead to unfavorable market conditions for the industry as a whole, and may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract customers and thereby have an adverse effect our growth and financial performance.

 1517 
Table of Contents 

We rely heavily on our management team, whose continued service and performance is critical to our future success. Any failure by management to properly manage growth, including hiring and retaining competent and skilled management and other personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

 

IfWe currently have four executive officers — our Chief Executive Officer and President, Zachary Bradford, our Chief Financial Officer, Lori Love, our Chief Revenue Officer, Amer Tadayon, and S. Matthew Schulz, our Executive Chairman — who are responsible for our management functions and are responsible for strategic development, financing and other critical functions. Some of the members of our management team and our board of directors may not have prior experience in the energy or cryptocurrency mining industries. This lack of experience may impair our management teams’ and directors’ ability to evaluate and make well-informed decisions involving our current operations and any future projects we may undertake in the industries in which we operate. Such impairment and lack of experience could adversely affect our business, develops as expected, we anticipate that we will grow rapidly infinancial condition and future operations.

Our future success depends significantly on the near future. Our failure to properly managecontinued service and performance of our expected rapidexisting management team. The departure, death, disability or other extended loss of services of any member of our management team, particularly with little or no notice, could cause delays on projects, frustrate our growth prospects and could have an adverse impact on our client and industry relationships, our project exploration and development programs, other aspects of our business and our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and prospects.

Our success, growth prospects, and ability to capitalize on market opportunities also depend to a material adverse effectsignificant extent on our ability to identify, hire, motivate and retain key personnel. qualified managerial personnel, including additional senior members of management. Our growth may be constrained by resource limitations as competitors and customers compete for increasingly scarce human capital resources. The demand for trained software engineers, electrical engineers, professionals familiar with cryptocurrency mining and other skilled workers is currently high. Our competitors may be able to offer a work environment with higher compensation or more opportunities than we can. Any new personnel we hire may not be or become as productive as we expect, as we may face challenges in adequately or appropriately integrating them into our workforce and culture. If we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of skilled personnel, our ability to successfully implement our business plan, grow our company and maintain or expand our product offerings may be adversely affected, and the costs of doing so may increase, which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our expansion could also place significant demands on our management, operations, systems, accounting, internal controls and financial resources. If we experience difficulties in any of these areas, we may not be able to expand our business successfully or effectively manage our growth. Any failure by management to manage growth and to respond to changes in our business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The lack of management experience in the renewable energy and microgrid industries could adversely affect our company.

Some members of management and the board of directors may not have prior experience in the energy industry. Some members do, however, have extensive work experience in the reclamation, environmental industries, energy industries, financial/accounting industries, and business management. The lack of experience in the alternative energy industry may impair our managements’ and directors’ ability to evaluate and make decisions involving our current operations and any future projects we may undertake in the alternative energy industry. Such impairment and lack of experience could adversely affect our business, financial condition and future operations.

If we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of skilled experts and workers our ability to pursue projects may be adversely affected and our costs may increase.

Our rate of growth will be confined by resource limitations as competitors and customers compete for increasingly scarce resources. We believe that our success depends upon our ability to attract, develop and retain a sufficient number of affordable trained experts that can execute our operational strategy. The demand for trained software engineers, electrical engineers and other skilled workers is currently high. If we are unable to attract and retain a sufficient number of skilled personnel, our ability to pursue projects may be adversely affected and the costs of performing our existing and future projects may increase, which may adversely impact our margins.

We have engaged in, and in the future may engage in, strategic acquisitions and other arrangements that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders, and reduce our financial resources.resources and harm our operating results.

 

We have been involvedpreviously engaged in significantstrategic transactions, including acquisitions of companies, product lines, technologies and personnel, such as our recent acquisitions of ATL in December 2020 and Solar Watt in February 2021, and, as part of our lifespan. Ingrowth strategy, in the future, we may enter into transactionsseek additional opportunities to acquire other businesses, productsexpand our product offerings or technologies. Ifthe markets we doserve by pursuing strategic transactions. Our ability to grow through future acquisitions will depend on the availability of, and our ability to identify, suitable candidates,acquisition and investment opportunities at an acceptable cost, our ability to compete effectively to attract those opportunities and the availability of financing to complete acquisitions. Future acquisitions may require us to issue common stock that would dilute our current stockholders’ percentage ownership, assume or otherwise be subject to liabilities of an acquired company, record goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges,

18
Table of Contents

incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets, incur large acquisition and integration costs, immediate write-offs, and restructuring and other related expenses, and become subject to litigation. The benefits of an acquisition may also take considerable time to develop, and we may notcannot be ablecertain that any particular acquisition will produce the intended benefits in a timely manner or to make such acquisitions on favorable termsthe extent anticipated or at all. AnyWe may experience difficulties integrating the operations, technologies, products, and personnel of an acquired company or be subjected to liability for the target’s pre-acquisition activities or operations as a successor in interest. Such integration may divert management’s attention from normal daily operations of our business. Future acquisitions may also expose us to potential risks, including risks associated with entering markets in which we have madeno or planlimited prior experience (such as our acquisition of our ATL subsidiary, in light of its cryptocurrency mining operations), especially when competitors in such markets have stronger market positions, the possibility of insufficient revenues to make may not strengthen our competitive position, and these transactions may be viewed negatively by customers or investors. We have and may decide inoffset the future toexpenses we incur debt in connection with an acquisition and potential loss of, or issueharm to, our common stock or other securities to the stockholdersrelationships with employees, customers, consumers and suppliers as a result of the acquired company, which would reduce the percentage ownershipintegration of our existing stockholders. We could incur losses resulting from undiscovered liabilities of the acquired business that are not covered by the indemnification we may obtain from the seller. In addition, we may not be able to successfully integrate the acquired personnel, technologies and operations into our existing business in an effective, timely and non-disruptive manner. Acquisitions may also divert management from day-to-day responsibilities, increase our expenses and reduce our cash available for operations and other uses. We cannot predict the number, timing or size of future acquisitions or the effect that the acquisition we have engaged in or any such future transactions might have on our operating results.new businesses.

Our energy business is substantially dependent on utility rate structures and government incentive programs that encourage the use of alternative energy sources. The reduction or elimination of government subsidies and economic incentives for energy-related technologies would harm our business.

 

We believe that near-term growth of energy-related technologies, including power conversion and solar energy technology, relies partly on the availability and size of government and economic incentives and grants (including, but not limited to, the U.S. Investment Tax Credit and various state and local incentive programs). These incentive programs could be challenged by utility companies, or for other reasons found to be unconstitutional, and/or could be reduced or discontinued for other reasons.reasons, all of which are outside of our control. The reduction, elimination, or expiration of government subsidies and economic incentives could harm our business.

 

16
Table of Contents

A combination of utility rate structures and government subsidies that encourage the use of alternative energy sources is a primary driver of demand for our energy products. For example, public utilities are often allowed to collect demand charges on commercial and industrial customers in addition to traditional usage charges. In addition, the federal government and many states encourage the use of alternative energy sources through a combination of direct subsidies and tariff incentives such as net metering for users that use alternative energy sources such as solar power. California also encourages alternative energy technology through its Self-Generation Incentive Program, or SGIP, which offers rebates for businesses and consumers who adopt certain new technologies. Other states have similar incentives and mandates which encourage the adoption of alternative energy sources. Notwithstanding the adoption of other incentive programs, we expect that California will be the most significant market for the sale of our energy products in the near term. Should California or another state in which we derive a substantial portion of our product revenues in the future change its utility rate structure or eliminate or significantly reduce its incentive programs, demand for our products could be substantially affected, which would adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and operating results.

 

Acquisitions could disruptIn the future, we may require additional financing to sustain and expand our operations, and harmwe may not be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms, or at all, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and prospects.

Our ability to operate profitably and to grow our business is dependent upon, among other things, generating sufficient revenue from our operations and, when and if needed, obtaining financing. If we are unable to generate sufficient revenues to operate and/or expand our business, we will be required to raise additional capital to fund operating deficits (if applicable) and growth of our business, pursue our business plans and to finance our operating results.activities, including through equity or debt financings, which may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all.

 

We

To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, stockholder ownership interest in the Company may seek additional opportunities to expand our product offeringsbe diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or the markets we serve by acquiring other companies, product lines, technologies and personnel. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following:

§difficulties integrating the operations, technologies, products, and personnel of an acquired company or being subjected to liability for the target’s pre–acquisition activities or operations as a successor in interest;
§diversion of management’s attention from normal daily operations of the business;
§potential difficulties completing projects associated with in–process research and development;
§difficulties entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience, especially when competitors in such markets have stronger market positions;
§initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners;
§insufficient revenues to offset increased expenses associated with acquisitions;
§the potential loss of key employees of the acquired companies; and
§the potential for recording goodwill and intangible assetspreferences that later can be subject to impairment.

Acquisitions may also cause us to:

§issue common stock that would dilute our current shareholders’ percentage ownership;
§assume or otherwise be subject to liabilities of an acquired company;
§record goodwill and non–amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges;
§incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets;
§incur large acquisition and integration costs, immediate write–offs, and restructuring and other related expenses; and
§become subject to litigation.

Mergers and acquisitions are inherently risky. No assurance can be given that our acquisitions will be successful. Further, no assurance can be given that an acquisition will not adversely affect rights as a stockholder. Debt and equity financings, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our business, operating results, or financial condition. Failureability to manage and successfully integrate an acquisition could harmtake specific actions, such as redeeming our business and operating results in a material way. Even when an acquired company has already developed and marketed products, there can be no assurance that enhancements to those products will be made in a timely manner or that pre–acquisition due diligence will identify all possible issues that might arise with respect to such products or the acquired business.

Risks Related to Our Securities

If a market for ourshares of common stock, does not develop, shareholders may be unable to sell their shares.making investments, incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “CLSK” on the OTCQB operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc., an electronic inter-dealer quotation medium for equity securities. We do not currently have an active trading market. There can be no assurance that an active and liquid trading market will develop or, if developed, that it will be sustained.

 

 1719 
Table of Contents 

 

We maintain our cash at financial institutions, which at times, exceed federally insured limits.

The majority of our cash is held in accounts at U.S. banking institutions that we believe are of high quality. Cash held in non-interest-bearing and interest-bearing operating accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. If such banking institutions were to fail, we could lose all or a portion of those amounts held in excess of such insurance limitations.

If we fail to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the market may have reduced confidence in our

reported financial information.

We must continue to document, test, monitor and enhance our internal control over financial reporting in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We will continue to perform the documentation and evaluations needed to comply with Section 404. If during this process our management identifies one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective, which may cause market participants to have reduced confidence in our reported financial condition.

Risks Related to Our securitiesCryptocurrency Mining Operations

Through our acquisition of ATL in December 2020, we expanded our business to include bitcoin mining, and we are thinly traded. Accordingly, itactively trying to grow our bitcoin mining infrastructure, equipment and capacity. Bitcoin mining is a significant portion of our business and revenues and is expected to continue to be the source of a majority of our revenues in the future. Our bitcoin mining activities, both now and in the future, may subject us to inherent risks, including the risks described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

If regulatory changes or interpretations of our activities require our registration as a money services business (an “MSB”) under the regulations promulgated by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) under the authority of the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (the “BSA”), or otherwise under state laws, we may incur significant compliance costs, which could be substantial or cost-prohibitive. If we become subject to these regulations, our costs in complying with them may have a material adverse effect on our business and the results of our operations.

To the extent our bitcoin mining activities cause us to be deemed an MSB under the regulations promulgated by FinCEN under the authority of the BSA, we may be difficultrequired to sell sharescomply with FinCEN regulations, including those that would mandate us to implement anti-money laundering programs, make certain reports to FinCEN and maintain certain records.

To the extent that our cryptocurrency activities cause us to be deemed a “money transmitter” ​(an “MT”) or be given an equivalent designation, under state law in any state in which we operate, we may be required to seek a license or otherwise register with a state regulator and comply with state regulations that may include the implementation of anti-money laundering programs, maintenance of certain records and other operational requirements. Currently, the New York State Department of Financial Services maintains a comprehensive “BitLicense” framework for businesses that conduct “virtual currency business activity.” In July 2020, Louisiana enacted the Virtual Currency Businesses Act, becoming the second state after New York to enact a stand-alone virtual currency law. We will continue to monitor for developments in state-level legislation, guidance or regulations applicable to us.

Such additional federal or state regulatory obligations in the United States or obligations that could arise under the regulatory frameworks of other countries may cause us to incur significant expenses, possibly affecting its business and financial condition in a material and adverse manner. Furthermore, we and our service providers may not be capable of complying with certain federal or state regulatory obligations applicable to MSBs and MTs or similar obligations in other countries. If we are deemed to be subject to such additional regulatory and registration or licensing requirements, we may be required to substantially alter our bitcoin mining activities and possibly cease engaging in such activities. Any such action may adversely affect our business operations and financial condition and an investment in our company.

Current regulation regarding the exchange of bitcoins under the CEA by the CFTC is unclear; to the extent we become subject to regulation by the CFTC in connection with our exchange of bitcoin, we may incur additional compliance costs, which may be significant.

The Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the “CEA”), does not currently impose any direct obligations on us related to the mining or exchange of bitcoins. Generally, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the federal agency that administers the CEA, regards bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as commodities. This position has been supported by decisions of federal courts.

20
Table of Contents

However, the CEA imposes requirements relative to certain transactions involving bitcoin and other digital assets that constitute a contract of sale of a commodity for future delivery (or an option on such a contract), a swap, or a transaction involving margin, financing or leverage that does not result in actual delivery of the commodity within 28 days to persons not defined as “eligible contract participants” or “eligible commercial entities” under the CEA (e.g., retail persons). Changes in the CEA or the regulations promulgated by the CFTC thereunder, as well as interpretations thereof and official promulgations by the CFTC, may impact the classification of bitcoins and, therefore, may subject them to additional regulatory oversight by the agency. Although to date the CFTC has not enacted regulations governing non-derivative or non-financed, margined or leveraged transactions in bitcoin, it has authority to commence enforcement actions against persons who violate certain prohibitions under the CEA related to transactions in any contract of sale of any commodity, including bitcoin, in interstate commerce (e.g., manipulation and engaging in certain deceptive practices).

We cannot be certain as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoins under the law. Any requirements imposed by the CFTC related to our mining activities or our transactions in bitcoin could cause us to incur additional extraordinary, non-recurring expenses, thereby materially and adversely impacting an investment in the Company. In addition, changes in the classification of bitcoins could subject us, as a result of our common stock without significantly depressingbitcoin mining operations, to additional regulatory oversight by the agency. Although to date the CFTC has not enacted regulations governing non-derivative or non-financed, margined or leveraged transactions in bitcoin, it has authority to commence enforcement actions against persons who violate certain prohibitions under the CEA related to transactions in any contract of sale of any commodity, including bitcoin, in interstate commerce (e.g., manipulation and engaging in certain deceptive practices).

Moreover, if our mining activities or transactions in bitcoin were deemed by the CFTC to constitute a collective investment in derivatives for our shareholders, we may be required to register as a commodity pool operator with the CFTC through the National Futures Association. Such additional registrations may result in extraordinary, non-recurring expenses, thereby materially and adversely impacting an investment in the Company. If we determine not to comply with such additional regulatory and registration requirements, we may seek to cease certain of our operations. Any such action may adversely affect an investment in the Company.

While no provision of the CEA, or CFTC rules, orders or rulings (except as noted herein) appears to be currently applicable to our business, this is subject to change.

If the SEC or another regulatory body considers bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency that we may mine in the future to be a security under U.S. securities laws, we may be required to comply with significant SEC registration and/or other requirements.

In general, novel or unique assets such as bitcoin and other digital assets may be classified as securities if they meet the definition of investment contracts under U.S. law. In recent years, the offer and sale of digital assets other than bitcoin, most notably Kik Interactive Inc.’s Kin tokens and Telegram Group Inc.’s TON tokens, have been deemed to be investment contracts by the SEC. While we believe that bitcoin is unlikely to be considered an investment contract, and thus a security under the investment contract definition, we cannot provide any assurances that digital assets that we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, including bitcoin, will never be classified as securities under U.S. law.

To the extent that any digital asset we have already mined or will mine is deemed a security, we may be obligated to comply with registration and/or other requirements by the SEC. This would cause us to incur significant, non-recurring expenses, thereby materially and adversely impacting an investment in the Company.

21
Table of Contents

If regulations or interpretations change and regulation of bitcoin under the U.S. securities laws or otherwise is promulgated, we may be classified as an investment company.

Current and future legislation and the SEC’s rulemaking and other regulatory developments, including interpretations released by a regulatory authority, may impact the manner in which bitcoin is treated for classification and clearing purposes. The SEC’s July 25, 2017 Report expressed its view that digital assets may be securities depending on the facts and circumstances. As of the date of this Annual Report, we are not aware of any rules that have been proposed to regulate bitcoin as a security, and SEC staff have publicly suggested that bitcoin is not a security for purposes of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), because current purchasers of bitcoin are not relying on the essential managerial and entrepreneurial efforts of others to produce a profit. We cannot be certain, however, as to how future regulatory developments will impact the treatment of bitcoin under the law.

For example, in the event that the bitcoin (or, in the future, any digital assets) held by us, whether as a result of our cryptocurrency mining business or otherwise (including by acquisition), are determined to constitute securities under the U.S. securities laws and such assets exceed 40% of our total assets, exclusive of cash, we would inadvertently become an investment company under the 1940 Act. Classification as an investment company under the 1940 Act requires registration with the SEC. If an investment company fails to register, it would have to stop doing almost all business, and its contracts would become voidable. Registration is time-consuming and restrictive and may require a restructuring of our operations, and we would be very constrained in the kind of business we could engage in as a registered investment company. Further, we would become subject to substantial regulation concerning management, operations, transactions with affiliated persons and portfolio composition, and would need to file reports under the 1940 Act. The cost of compliance with the 1940 Act and any other regulations applicable to our crypto mining business would result in our incurring substantial additional expenses, and the failure to properly register with the SEC or otherwise if required would have a materially adverse impact to conduct our operations.

It may be illegal now, or in the future, to mine, acquire, own, hold, sell or use bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, participate in blockchains or utilize similar cryptocurrency assets in one or more countries, the ruling of which could adversely affect us.

Although currently cryptocurrencies generally are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, several countries, such as China, India and Russia, may continue taking regulatory actions in the future that could severely restrict the right to mine, acquire, own, hold, sell or use these cryptocurrency assets or to exchange for local currency. For example, in China and Russia (India is currently proposing new legislation), it is illegal to accept payment in bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies for consumer transactions and banking institutions are barred from accepting deposits of cryptocurrencies. In addition, in March 2021, the governmental authorities for the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia banned bitcoin mining in the province due to the industry’s intense electrical power demands and its negative environmental impacts. If other countries, including the U.S., implement similar restrictions, such restrictions may adversely affect us. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of the stock. Unlessany bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and thus harm investors.

There are successful in developing continued investor interestseveral new and existing competitors in our stock, salesindustry that are purchasing mining equipment at scale, which may cause delays or difficulty in us obtaining new miners.

Many of the competitors in our stockindustry have also been purchasing mining equipment at scale, which has caused a world-wide shortage of mining equipment and extended the corresponding delivery schedules for new miner purchases. There are no assurances that Bitmain, or any other manufacturers, will be able to keep pace with the surge in demand for mining equipment. It is uncertain how manufacturers will respond to this increased global demand and whether they can deliver on the schedules promised to all of their customers. In the event Bitmain or other manufacturers, are not able to keep pace with demand, we may not be able to purchase additional miners in sufficient quantities, on the delivery schedules that meet our business needs, or at favorable prices.

22
Table of Contents

The impact of geopolitical and economic events on the demand for bitcoin is uncertain.

Geopolitical crises may trigger large-scale purchases of bitcoin, which could rapidly increase their prices. This may, however, also increase the likelihood of a subsequent price swing in the opposite direction as crisis-driven purchasing behavior dissipates, ultimately decreasing the value of bitcoins or any other digital asset in our possession. Such risks are similar to the risks of purchasing commodities in generally uncertain times, such as the risk of purchasing, holding or selling gold.

Alternatively, global crises and economic downturns may discourage investment in bitcoin and digital assets in general as investors shift their investments towards less volatile asset classes. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

The value of bitcoin may be subject to pricing risk and has historically been subject to wide swings. Because we do not currently hedge our investment in bitcoin and do not intend to for the foreseeable future, we may be directly exposed to bitcoin’s price volatility and surrounding risks.

While bitcoin prices are determined primarily using data from various exchanges, over-the-counter markets and derivative platforms, they have historically been volatile and are impacted by a variety of factors. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the worldwide growth in the adoption and use of bitcoins, the maintenance and development of the software protocol of the bitcoin network, changes in consumer demographics and public tastes, fraudulent or illegitimate actors, real or perceived scarcity, and political, economic, regulatory or other conditions. Furthermore, pricing may be the result of, and may continue to result in, majorspeculation regarding future appreciation in the value of bitcoin, or our share price, making prices more volatile or creating “bubble” type risks.

Currently, we do not use a formula or specific methodology to determine whether or when we will sell bitcoin that we hold, or the number of bitcoins we will sell. Rather, decisions to hold or sell bitcoins are currently determined by analyzing forecasts and monitoring the market in real time. Such decisions, however well-informed, may result in untimely sales and even losses, adversely affecting an investment in us. At this time, we do not anticipate engaging in any hedging activities related to our holding of bitcoin; this could expose us to substantial decreases in the price of bitcoin.

The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may cause consumers to use alternative distributed ledgers or other alternatives.

The development and acceptance of competing blockchain platforms or technologies may cause consumers to abandon bitcoin. As we exclusively mine, and expect to exclusively mine bitcoin, we could face difficulty adapting to emergent digital ledgers, blockchains, or alternatives thereto. This could prevent us from realizing the anticipated profits from our investments. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account and harm investors.

Bitcoin faces significant challenges with scaling which, if not overcome, may lead to high fees or slow transaction settlement times.

Bitcoin is presently limited with respect to how many transactions can occur per second. Developers and contributors in the bitcoin ecosystem debate potential solutions to increasing the average number of transactions per second that networks can handle. Some have implemented mechanisms or are researching ways to increase scale, such as increasing the allowable sizes of blocks, and therefore the number of transactions per block, which would increase the number of transactions that could occur per second. However, it is uncertain how long those mechanisms being explored to increase the scale of settlement of bitcoin transactions will take to become effective, if at all. Any failure to improve bitcoin settlement times could materially affect the price of bitcoin and, as a result, adversely affect an investment in us.

23
Table of Contents

Bitcoin is subject to halving; the reward for successfully solving a block will halve several times in the future and its value may not adjust to compensate us for the reduction in the rewards we receive from our mining efforts.

Halving is a process designed to control the overall supply and reduce the risk of inflation in cryptocurrencies using a Proof-of-Work consensus algorithm. In an event referred to as bitcoin “halving,” the bitcoin reward for mining any block is cut in half. For example, the mining reward for bitcoin declined from 12.5 to 6.25 bitcoin on May 11, 2020. This process is scheduled to occur once every 210,000 blocks, or roughly four years, until the total amount of bitcoin rewards issued reaches 21 million, which is expected to occur around 2140. Once 21 million bitcoin are generated, the network will stop producing more. Currently, there are more than 18 million bitcoin in circulation. While bitcoin prices have had a history of price fluctuations around halving events, there is no guarantee that the price change will be favorable or would compensate for the reduction in mining reward. If a corresponding and proportionate increase in the price of bitcoin does not follow these anticipated halving events, the revenue from our mining operations would decrease, and we may not have an adequate incentive to continue mining and may cease mining operations altogether, which may adversely affect an investment in us.

Furthermore, such reductions in bitcoin rewards for uncovering blocks may result in a reduction in the aggregate hash rate of the bitcoin network as the incentive for miners decreases. Miners ceasing operations would reduce the collective processing power on the network, which would adversely affect the confirmation process for transactions and make the bitcoin network more vulnerable to malicious actors or botnets obtaining control in excess of 50 % of the processing power active on the blockchain. Such events may adversely affect our activities and an investment in us.

If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control of more than 50% of the processing power on the bitcoin network, such actor or botnet could manipulate the network to adversely affect us, which would adversely affect an investment in us.

If a malicious actor or botnet, a collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of the computers, obtains over 50% of the processing power dedicated to mining bitcoin, such actor may be able to construct fraudulent blocks or prevent certain transactions from completing in a timely manner, or at all. The malicious actor or botnet could control, exclude or modify the order of transactions, though it could not generate new units or transactions using such control. The malicious actor could also “double-spend,” or spend the same bitcoin in more than one transaction, or it could prevent transactions from being validated. In certain instances, reversing any fraudulent or malicious changes made to the bitcoin blockchain may not be possible.

Although there are no known reports of malicious activity or control of blockchains achieved through controlling over 50% of the processing power on the bitcoin network, it is believed that certain mining pools may have exceeded, and could exceed, the 50% threshold on the bitcoin network. This possibility creates a greater risk that a single mining pool could exert authority over the validation of bitcoin transactions. To the extent that the bitcoin ecosystem, and the administrators of mining pools, do not have adequate controls and responses in place, the risk of a malicious actor obtaining control of the processing power may increase. If such an event were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account and harm investors.

Our reliance on a third-party mining pool service provider for our mining revenue payouts may adversely affect an investment in us.

We currently rely on Foundry Digital and Antpool (“pools” or “Cryptocurrency Customers”), open access mining pools that support cryptocurrencies including bitcoin, to receive our mining rewards and fees from the network. Our pools have the sole discretion to modify the terms of our agreement at any time, and, therefore, our future rights and relationship with our pools may change. In general, mining pools allow miners to combine their computing and processing power, increasing their chances of solving a block and getting paid by the bitcoin network. The rewards, distributed proportionally to our contribution to the pool’s overall mining power, are distributed by the pool operator. Should our pools’ operator systems suffer downtime due to a cyber-attack, software malfunction or other similar issues, it will negatively impact our ability to mine and receive revenue. Furthermore, while we receive daily reports from our pools detailing the total processing power provided to the pools and the proportion of that total processing power, we provided to determine the distribution of

24
Table of Contents

rewards to us, we are dependent on the accuracy of our pool’s record keeping. Therefore, we have little means of recourse against our pools’ operators if we determine the proportion of the reward paid out to us by the mining pool operator is incorrect, other than leaving the pools. If we are unable to consistently obtain accurate proportionate rewards from our pools, we may experience reduced rewards for our efforts, which would have an adverse effect on our business and operations.

Bitcoins and other digital assets we mine or hold for our own account may be subject to loss, theft or restriction on access.

There is a risk that some or all of our bitcoins could be lost or stolen. Bitcoins are stored in and accessed by cryptocurrency sites commonly referred to as “wallets.” A hot wallet refers to any cryptocurrency wallet that is connected to the Internet. Generally, hot wallets are easier to set up and access than wallets in cold storage, but they are also more susceptible to hackers and other technical vulnerabilities. Cold storage refers to any cryptocurrency wallet that is not connected to the Internet. Cold storage is generally more secure than hot storage, but is not ideal for quick or regular transactions. When we keep our bitcoin in cold storage, we may experience lag time in our ability to respond to market fluctuations in the price of the stock.our cryptocurrency assets.

 

We currently mine bitcoin by contributing to and benefiting from our pools’ processing power. Our share of bitcoins mined from our pools are initially received by us in wallets we control, which are maintained by Coinbase Inc., a U.S. based digital assets exchange. We maintain the majority of our bitcoin in cold storage with a minority allocation kept in hot wallets for working capital purposes. Bitcoins we mine or hold for our own account may be subject to loss, theft or restriction on access. Hackers or malicious actors may launch attacks to steal, compromise or secure bitcoins, such as by attacking the bitcoin network source code, exchange miners, third-party platforms (including Coinbase), cold and hot storage locations or software, or by other means. We may be in control and possession of substantial holdings of bitcoin, and as we increase in size, we may become a more appealing target of hackers, malware, cyber-attacks or other security threats. Any of these events may adversely affect our operations and, consequently, our investments and profitability.

The loss or destruction of private keys required to access our bitcoins may be irreversible. Our loss of access to our private keys or our experience of a data loss relating to our bitcoins could adversely affect an investment in us.

Bitcoins may only be controlled by the possessor of both the unique public and private keys relating to the local or online digital wallet in which they are held. We publish the public key relating to digital wallets in use when we verify the receipt or transfers of bitcoins to and from our wallets and disseminate such information into the network on an anonymous basis, but we safeguard the private keys relating to such digital wallets. Digital asset exchanges, such as Coinbase, where we hold our bitcoin, engage in similar practices. To the extent such private keys are lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised, we will be unable to access our bitcoins and such private keys may not be capable of being restored by any network. Any loss of private keys relating to digital wallets used to store our bitcoins whether by us or digital asset exchanges where we hold our bitcoin, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Incorrect or fraudulent bitcoin transactions may be irreversible.

Bitcoin transactions are irreversible and stolen or incorrectly transferred bitcoins may thus be irretrievable. While we exchange our bitcoins directly for U.S. dollars on Coinbase and do not presently use, or expect to use, our bitcoins for any other transactions, any incorrectly executed or fraudulent cryptocurrency transactions may still adversely affect our investments and assets.

Forks in the bitcoin network may occur in the future, which may affect the value of bitcoins held by us.

A small group of contributors can propose refinements or improvements to the bitcoin network’s source code that alter the protocols and software that govern the bitcoin network and the properties of bitcoin, including the irreversibility of transactions and limitations on the mining of new bitcoin. This is known as a “fork.” In the event a developer or group of developers proposes modifications to the bitcoin network that are not accepted by a majority of miners and users, but that is nonetheless accepted by a substantial plurality of miners and users, two or more competing and incompatible blockchain implementations could result. This is known as a “hard fork.”

25
Table of Contents

The value of bitcoin after the creation of a fork is subject to many factors, including, but not limited to, the value of the fork product, market reaction to the creation of the fork product, and the occurrence of forks in the future. As such, existing forks, such as Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold, and future forks may have a negative effect on bitcoin’s value and may adversely affect an investment in us.

The open-source structure of the bitcoin network protocol means that the contributors to the protocol are generally not directly compensated for their contributions in maintaining and developing the protocol. A failure to properly monitor and upgrade the protocol could damage the bitcoin network and an investment in us.

As an open-source project, bitcoin does not generate revenues for its contributors, and contributors are generally not compensated for maintaining and updating the bitcoin network protocol. The lack of guaranteed financial incentives for contributors to maintain or develop the bitcoin network and the lack of guaranteed resources to adequately address emerging issues with the bitcoin network may reduce incentives to address the issues adequately or in a timely manner. To the extent that contributors may fail to adequately update and maintain the bitcoin network protocol, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Banks and financial institutions may not provide banking services, or may cut off services, to businesses that engage in cryptocurrency-related activities.

A number of companies that engage in bitcoin and/or other cryptocurrency-related activities have been unable to find banks or financial institutions that are willing to provide them with bank accounts and other services. Similarly, a number of companies and individuals or businesses associated with cryptocurrencies may have had and may continue to have their existing bank accounts closed or services discontinued with financial institutions. To the extent that such events may happen to us, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

Our interactions with the bitcoin network may expose us to SDN or blocked persons or cause us to violate provisions of law that did not contemplate distributed ledger technology.

The Office of Financial Assets Control (“OFAC”) of the US Department of Treasury requires us to comply with its sanction program and not conduct business with persons named on its specially designated nationals (“SDN”) list. However, because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions, we may inadvertently and without our knowledge engage in transactions with persons named on OFAC’s SDN list. We also may not be adequately capable of determining the ultimate identity of the persons with whom we transact.

The digital asset exchanges on which cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin, trade are relatively new and largely unregulated, and thus may be exposed to fraud and failure. Such failures may result in a reduction in the price of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and can adversely affect an investment in us.

Digital asset exchanges on which cryptocurrencies trade are relatively new and, in most cases, largely unregulated. Many digital exchanges do not provide the public with significant information regarding their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices or regulatory compliance. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence in, or may experience problems relating to, cryptocurrency exchanges, including prominent exchanges handling a significant portion of the volume of digital asset trading.

A lack of stability in the digital asset exchange market and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital asset exchanges due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government-mandated regulation may reduce confidence in digital asset networks and result in greater volatility in cryptocurrency values. These potential consequences of a digital asset exchange’s failure could adversely affect an investment in us.

26
Table of Contents

We may not have adequate sources of recovery if our digital assets are lost, stolen or destroyed.

We rely on Coinbase to facilitate the custody of our bitcoins. If our bitcoins are lost, stolen or destroyed under circumstances rendering a party, including Coinbase, liable to us, the responsible party may not have the financial resources sufficient to satisfy our claim. For example, as to a particular event of loss, the only source of recovery for us might be limited, to the extent identifiable, to other responsible third parties (e.g., a thief or terrorist), any of which may not have the financial resources (including liability insurance coverage) to satisfy a valid claim of ours.

Bitcoins held by us are not subject to FDIC or SIPC protections.

We do not hold our bitcoins with a banking institution or a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) or the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”), and, therefore, our bitcoins are not subject to the protections enjoyed by depositors with FDIC or SIPC member institutions. As a result, we may suffer a loss with respect to our bitcoins that is not covered by insurance, and we may not be able to recover any of our carried value in these bitcoins if they are lost or stolen or suffer significant and sustained reduction in conversion spot price. If we are not otherwise able to recover damages from a malicious actor in connection with these losses, our business and results of operations may suffer, which may have a material negative impact on our stock price.

The limited rights of legal recourse available to us expose us and our investors to the risk of loss of our bitcoins for which no person is liable.

At this time, there is no specifically enumerated U.S. or foreign governmental, regulatory, investigative or prosecutorial authority or mechanism through which to bring an action or complaint regarding missing or stolen cryptocurrency. To the extent that we are unable to recover our losses from such action, error or theft, such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations of and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

The sale of our bitcoins to pay for expenses at a time of low bitcoin prices could adversely affect an investment in us.

We may sell our bitcoins to pay for expenses on an as-needed basis, irrespective of then-current prices. Consequently, we may sell our bitcoins at a time when bitcoin prices are low, which could adversely affect an investment in us. At this time, we do not mitigate against the potential for decreasing price by engaging in hedging activities related to our bitcoin holdings. See the above risk factor entitled, “The value of bitcoin may be subject to pricing risk and has historically been subject to wide swings. Because we do not currently hedge our investment in bitcoin and do not intend to for the foreseeable future, we may be directly exposed to bitcoin’s price volatility and surrounding risks”.

Demand for bitcoin is driven, in part, by its status as a prominent and secure cryptocurrency. It is possible that a cryptocurrency other than bitcoin could have features that make it more desirable to a material portion of the digital asset user base, resulting in a reduction in demand for bitcoins.

Bitcoin holds a “first-to-market” advantage over other cryptocurrencies. This first-to-market advantage is driven in large part by having the largest user base and, more importantly, the largest combined mining power in use. Nonetheless, another form of cryptocurrency could become materially popular due to either a perceived or exposed shortcoming of the bitcoin network or a perceived advantage of another form of digital currency. If another form of digital currency obtains significant market share, this could reduce the interest in, and value of, bitcoin and the profitability of our bitcoin operations.

Our mining costs may be in excess of our mining revenues, which could seriously harm our business and adversely impact an investment in us.

Mining operations are costly and our expenses may increase in the future. Increases in mining expenses may not be offset by corresponding increases in revenue. Our expenses may become greater than we anticipate, and our investments to make our business more cost-efficient may not succeed. Increases in our costs without corresponding increases in our revenue would adversely affect our profitability and could seriously harm our business and an investment in us.

27
Table of Contents

The properties included in our mining operation may experience damages, including damages that are not covered by insurance.

Our current mining locations and any future sites we establish will be subject to a variety of risks relating to physical condition and operation, including but not limited to:

·construction or repair defects or other structural or building damage; any noncompliance with or liabilities under applicable environmental, health or safety regulations or requirements or building permit requirements;

·any damage resulting from natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods and windstorms; and

·claims by employees and others for injuries sustained at our properties.

Although our mining sites are equipped with standard security measures normally associated with a traditional data center, our mining sites could still be rendered inoperable, temporarily or permanently, as a result of a fire or other natural disaster or by a terrorist or other events outside of our control. The measures we take to prevent and insure against these risks may not be sufficient or effective.

We are subject to risks associated with our need for significant electrical power.

The operation of a bitcoin mining facility can require massive amounts of electrical power. Any mining site we currently operate or establish in the future can only be successful if we can continue to obtain sufficient electrical power for that site on a cost-effective basis. To the extent that we establish multiple sites, there may be significant competition for suitable locations, and government regulators may potentially restrict the ability of electricity suppliers to provide electricity to mining operations in times of electricity shortage or may otherwise potentially restrict or prohibit the provision or electricity to mining operations.

Additionally, our facilities could be adversely affected by a power outage. Although we maintain limited backup power at certain sites, it would not be feasible to run miners on back-up power generators in the event of a government restriction on electricity or a power outage. To the extent we are unable to receive adequate power supply and are forced to reduce or cease our operations due to the availability or cost of electrical power, our business would be adversely affected.

Our operations and profitability may be adversely affected by competition from other methods of investing in cryptocurrencies.

We compete with other users and/or companies that are mining cryptocurrencies and other potential financial vehicles, including securities backed by or linked to cryptocurrencies. Market and financial conditions, and other conditions beyond our control, may make it more attractive to invest in other financial vehicles, or to invest in cryptocurrencies directly, which could limit the market for our shares and reduce their liquidity. The emergence of other financial vehicles and exchange-traded funds have increased scrutiny on cryptocurrencies, and such scrutiny could be applicable to us and impact our ability to successfully establish or maintain a public market for our securities. Such circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

To the extent that the profit margins of bitcoin mining operations are not high, operators of bitcoin mining operations are more likely to immediately sell bitcoin rewards earned by mining in the market, thereby constraining the growth of the price of bitcoin.

28
Table of Contents

Bitcoin mining operations have evolved from individual users mining with computer processors, graphics processing units and first-generation ASIC servers. Currently, new processing power is predominantly added by incorporated and unincorporated professionalized mining operations. Professionalized mining operations may use proprietary hardware or sophisticated ASIC machines acquired from ASIC manufacturers. They require the investment of significant capital for the acquisition of this specialized hardware, the leasing of operating space (often in data centers or warehousing facilities), incurring of electricity costs and the employment of technicians to operate the mining farms. As a result, professionalized mining operations are of a greater scale than those prior and have more defined and regular expenses and liabilities. These regular expenses and liabilities require professionalized mining operations to maintain profit margins on the sale of bitcoin. To the extent the price of bitcoin declines and such profit margin decreases, professionalized miners will be pressured to immediately sell bitcoin earned from mining operations, whereas it is believed that smaller, individual operations in past years were more likely to hold newly mined bitcoin for lengthier periods. The immediate selling of newly mined bitcoin greatly increases the trading volume of bitcoin, creating downward pressure on the market price of bitcoin.

There are risks related to technological obsolescence, the vulnerability of the global supply chain for cryptocurrency hardware disruption, and difficulty in obtaining new hardware which may have a negative effect on our business.

Our mining operations can only be successful and ultimately profitable if the costs, including hardware and electricity costs, associated with mining bitcoin are lower than the price of a single bitcoin. As our mining facility operates, our miners experience ordinary wear and tear, and may also face more significant malfunctions caused by a number of extraneous factors beyond our control. The degradation of our miners will require us to, over time, replace those miners which are no longer functional. Additionally, as the technology evolves, we may be required to acquire newer models of miners to remain competitive in the market. This upgrading process requires substantial capital investment, and we may face challenges in doing so on a timely and cost-effective basis.

Further, the global supply of miners is unpredictable and presently heavily dependent on manufacturers based in China, which was severely affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 coronavirus global pandemic. We currently utilize several types of ASIC miners as part of our mining operation, including Bitmain Antminers, Avalon miners and MicroBT WhatsMiners, which are all produced in China, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Geopolitical matters, including the U.S. relationship with China, may impact our ability to import ASIC miners. As a result, we may not be able to obtain adequate replacement parts for our existing miners or obtain additional miners from manufacturers on a timely basis. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account, and harm investors.

There is a possibility of bitcoin mining algorithms transitioning to proof of stake validation and other mining related risks, which could make us less competitive and ultimately adversely affect our business and an investment in us.

Proof of stake is an alternative method in validating cryptocurrency transactions. Should the bitcoin mining algorithm shift from a proof of work validation method to a proof of stake method, mining would require less energy and may render any company that maintains advantages in the current climate (for example, from lower priced electricity, processing, real estate, or hosting) less competitive. As a result of our efforts to optimize and improve the efficiency of our bitcoin mining operations, we may be exposed to the risk in the future of losing the benefit of our capital investments and the competitive advantage we hope to gain and may be negatively impacted if a switch to proof of stake validation were to occur. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects or operations and potentially the value of any bitcoin we mine or otherwise acquire or hold for our own account.

We may face risks of Internet disruptions, which could have an adverse effect on not only the price of bitcoin but our ability to mine bitcoin.

A disruption of the Internet may adversely affect the mining and use of cryptocurrencies, including bitcoin. Generally, cryptocurrencies and our business of mining bitcoin is dependent upon the Internet. A significant disruption in Internet connectivity could disrupt bitcoin’s network operations until the disruption is resolved and have an adverse effect on the price of bitcoin and our ability to mine bitcoin.

29
Table of Contents

Since there has been limited precedent set for financial accounting of digital assets, including bitcoin, it is unclear how we will be required to account for transactions involving digital assets.

Because there has been limited precedent set for the financial accounting of cryptocurrencies and related revenue recognition and no official guidance has yet been provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the SEC, it is unclear how companies may in the future be required to account for cryptocurrency transactions and assets and related revenue recognition. A change in regulatory or financial accounting standards or interpretation by the SEC could result in changes in our accounting treatment and the necessity to restate our financial statements. Such a restatement could adversely impact the accounting for the bitcoins we hold and bitcoin transactions and, more generally, negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Future developments regarding the treatment of digital assets for U.S. federal income and applicable state, local and non-U.S. tax purposes could adversely impact our business.

Due to the new and evolving nature of digital assets and the absence of comprehensive legal guidance with respect to digital assets and related transactions, many significant aspects of the U.S. federal income and applicable state, local and non-U.S. tax treatment of transactions involving digital assets, such as the purchase and sale of bitcoin and the receipt of staking rewards and other digital asset incentives and rewards products, are uncertain, and it is unclear what guidance may be issued in the future with respect to the tax treatment of digital assets and related transactions.

Current IRS guidance indicates that for U.S. federal income tax purposes digital assets such as bitcoins should be treated and taxed as property, and that transactions involving the payment of bitcoins for goods and services should be treated in effect as barter transactions. The IRS has also released guidance to the effect that, under certain circumstances, hard forks of digital currencies are taxable events giving rise to taxable income and guidance with respect to the determination of the tax basis of digital currency. However, current IRS guidance does not address other significant aspects of the U.S. federal income tax treatment of digital assets and related transactions. Moreover, although current IRS guidance addresses the treatment of certain forks, there continues to be uncertainty with respect to the timing and amount of income inclusions for various crypto asset transactions, including, but not limited to, staking rewards and other crypto asset incentives and rewards products. While current IRS guidance creates a potential tax reporting requirement for any circumstance where the ownership of a bitcoin passes from one person to another, it preserves the right to apply capital gains treatment to those transactions, which is generally favorable for investors in bitcoin.

There can be no assurance that the IRS will not alter its existing position with respect to digital assets in the future or that other state, local and non-U.S. taxing authorities or courts will follow the approach of the IRS with respect to the treatment of digital assets such as bitcoins for income tax and sales tax purposes. Any such alteration of existing guidance or issuance of new or different guidance may have negative consequences including the imposition of a greater tax burden on investors in bitcoin or imposing a greater cost on the acquisition and disposition of bitcoin, generally; in either case potentially having a negative effect on the trading price of bitcoin or otherwise negatively impacting our business. In addition, future technological and operational developments that may arise with respect to digital currencies may increase the uncertainty with respect to the treatment of digital currencies for U.S. federal income and applicable state, local and non-U.S. tax purposes.

Risks Related to Our Securities

The price of our common stock price may be volatile and could fluctuate widely, in price, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

30
Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:including, without limitation:

 

§·technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;
§·government regulation of our products and services;
§·the establishment of partnerships with other technology companies;
§·intellectual property disputes;
§·additions or departures of key personnel;
§·sales of our common stockstock;
§·our ability to integrate operations, technology, products and services;
§·our ability to execute our business plan;
§·operating results below expectations;
§·loss of any strategic relationship;
§·industry developments;
§·economic and other external factors; and
§·period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

 

Because we have limited revenues to date, you should consider any one of these factors to be material. Our stock price may fluctuate widely as a result of any of the above.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materiallyand adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

We have the right to designate and issue additional shares of preferred stock. If we were to designate and/or issue additional preferred stock, it is likely to have rights, preferences and privileges that may adversely affect the common stock.

We are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, blank-check Preferred Stock, with such rights, preferences and privileges as may be determined from time-to-time time to time by our boardBoard of directors. Directors. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stockPreferred Stock in one or more series, and to fix for any series the dividend rights, dissolution or liquidation preferences, redemption prices, conversion rights, voting rights, and other rights, preferences and privileges for the preferred stock. We currently have 1,000,000Preferred Stock. Currently, 2,000,000 shares are designated as Series A Preferred Stock, of our preferred stock which 1,750,000 shares are outstanding, the features of which are containeddiscussed elsewhere in this annual report.Annual Report.

 

The issuance of shares of preferred stock, Preferred Stock, depending on the rights, preferences and privileges attributable to the preferred stock, Preferred Stock, could reduce the voting rights and powers of the common stock and the portion of our assets allocated for distribution to common stockholders in a liquidation event, and could also result in dilution in the book value per share of the common stock we are offering. . The preferred stock could also be utilized, under certain circumstances, as a method for raising additional capital or discouraging, delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company, to the detriment of the investors in the common stock offered hereby. We cannot assure you that we will not, under certain circumstances, issue shares of our preferred stock.Preferred Stock.

We have not paid dividends on shares of our common stock in the past and have no immediate plans to pay dividends.do so in the future.

We plan to reinvest all of our earnings, to the extent we have earnings, in order to market our productsnot paid, and to cover operating costs and to otherwise become and remain competitive. We do not plan to pay, any cash dividends with respect to our securitiescommon stock in the foreseeableimmediate future. We plan to reinvest all of our earnings, to the extent we have earnings, in order to market our products and to cover operating costs and to otherwise become and remain competitive. We cannot assure you stockholders that we would, at any time, generate sufficient surplus cash that would be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock as a dividend. Therefore, you stockholders should not expect to receive cash dividends on our commonstock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

 1831 
Table of Contents 

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or do not continue to publish research or reports about our business, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If any of the analysts who cover us now or in the future issue an adverse opinion regarding our stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets,which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

 

Because we are subject to the “Penny Stock” rules, the level of trading activity in our stock may be reduced.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define "penny stock" to be any listed, trading equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exemptions. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock, the broker-dealer make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules which may increase the difficulty Purchasers may experience in attempting to liquidate such securities.

Provisions in the Nevada Revised Statutes and our Bylaws could make it very difficult for an investor to bring any legal actions against our directors or officers for violations of their fiduciary duties or could require us to pay any amounts incurred by our directors or officers in any such actions.

Members of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors and our officers will have no liability for breaches of their fiduciary duty of care as a director or officer, except in limited circumstances, pursuant to provisions in the Nevada Revised Statutes and our Bylaws as authorized by the Nevada Revised Statutes. Specifically, Section 78.138 of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that a director or officer is not individually liable to the company or its shareholders or creditors for any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer unless it is proven that (1) the director’sdirectors or officer’sofficers act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and (2) his or her breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. This provision is intended to afford directors and officers protection against and to limit their potential liability for monetary damages resulting from suits alleging a breach of the duty of care by a director or officer.

Accordingly, youstockholders may be unable to prevail in a legal action against our directors or officers even if they have breached their fiduciary duty of care. In addition, our Bylaws allow us to indemnify our directors and officers from and against any and all costs, charges and expenses resulting from their acting in such capacities with us. This means that if youone were able to enforce an action against our directors or officers, in all likelihood, we would be required to pay any expenses they incurred in defending the lawsuit and any judgment or settlement they otherwise would be required to pay. Accordingly, our indemnification obligations could divert needed financial resources and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

Item 2. Properties

 

Currently, we do not own anyOn August 6, 2021, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary CSRE Properties Norcross, LLC, closed on the purchase of real estate. Our corporate offices areproperty located at 70 North Main Street,5295 Brook Hollow Parkway, Norcross, Georgia, 30071 (the “Norcross Property”). The total purchase price was $6,550,000 and the seller conveyed fee simple title by limited warranty deed. The Norcross Property consists of an office building of approximately 86,000 square feet on approximately 7 acres of land. The Norcross Property is utilized by CleanBlok to conduct cryptocurrency mining activities.

On May 20, 2021, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary ATL, closed on the purchase of real property located at 2380 Godby Road, College Park, Georgia, 30349 (the “Godby Road Property”), which it had been leasing prior to the purchase. The total purchase price was $4,711,799 and the seller conveyed fee simple title by limited warranty deed. The Godby Road Property consists of an office/warehouse building of approximately 41,387 square feet on approximately 6 acres of land. The Godby Road Property is utilized by ATL and CleanBlok to conduct cryptocurrency mining activities.

On June 15, 2021, the Company entered into a lease for warehouse and office space at 2042 Corte Del Nogal, Suite 105, Bountiful Utah 84010.C, Carlsbad, California, 92011. The 5-year lease is for an approximately 12,704 square foot industrial unit and part of a larger 47,744 square foot multi-tenant industrial flex building and requires monthly base rent payments of $11,307. The leased property is utilized by our energy segment.

32
Table of Contents

On August 26, 2021, the Company entered into a lease for office space at 2370 Corporate Circle, Suite 160, Henderson, Nevada, 89074. The 65-month lease is for 4,552 rentable square feet an initial base rent of $10,925 and increases 3% each year. The Corporate Circle space will be utilized as the CleanSpark corporate and executive headquarters. Until the Corporate Circle location is move-in ready, we sublease offices located at 8475 S. Eastern Ave., Suite 200, Las Vegas, Nevada. We executedare currently on a one-yearyear-to-year lease agreement that calls for us to make payments of $850$1,525 per month.

 

We also have an office located at 1185 S. 1800 W, Suite 3, Woods Cross Utah 84087. We are currently on a year-to-year lease agreement that calls for us to make payments of $2,300 per month. This property is utilized by corporate employees.

The Company believes its existing facilities and equipment are in good operating condition and are suitable for the conduct of its business.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are subject to litigation, claims, investigations and audits arising from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

For a description of our material pending legal proceedings, please see footnote 15 pertaining to commitments and contingencies included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

 1933 
Table of Contents 

 

We operate our California operations out of leased office space located at 4360 Viewridge Avenue, Suite C, San Diego, California. On May 15, 2018, we executed a 37-month lease agreement, which commenced on July 1, 2018. The agreement calls for us to make payments of $4,057 in base rent per month through July 31, 2021 subject to an annual 3% rent escalation. Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilities as of September 30, 2018, are as follows:

Fiscal year ending September 30, 2019$49,049
Fiscal year ending September 30, 2020$50,521
Fiscal year ending September 30, 2021$43,170

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 4.Mine Safety DisclosuresPART II

 

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’sRegistrants Common Equity, and Related Stockholder Mattersand Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is quotedlisted on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the ticker symbol “CLSK” on the OTCQB operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. 

There is currently no active trading market for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCQB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2018
Quarter Ended High $ Low $
 September 30, 2018   6.80   1.50 
 June 30, 2018   1.51   0.90 
 March 31, 2018   1.00   0.80 
 December 31, 2017   2.63   1.00 

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2017
Quarter Ended High $ Low $
 September 30, 2017   2.50   2.50 
 June 30, 2017   3.01   2.50 
 March 31, 2017   4.00   2.50 
 December 31, 2016   3.50   2.50 

Penny Stock

The Securities Exchange Commission has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system.  The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized

20
Table of Contents

risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading;(b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask  price;(d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;(e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and;(f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with; (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock;(b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;(c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock if it becomes subject to these penny stock rules. Therefore, because our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, stockholders may have difficulty selling those securities.“CLSK.”

 

Holders of Our Common Stock

 

As of January 9, 2019,December 14, 2021, we had 282185 registered holders of record of our common stock, with others in street name.

 

The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. Holders of theour common stock have no preemptive rights and no right to convert their common stock into any other securities. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to theour common stock.

 

Dividends

 

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

 

 1.we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business, or;

 

 2.our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.

 

We have notnever declared any dividends on shares of our common stock, and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of UnregisteredSecurities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

 

Common StockAs of December 10, 2021, we issued an aggregate of 8,404 unregistered shares of our common stock to the Sellers of Gridfabric in accordance with the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement entered into on August 31, 2020, based upon the achievement of certain milestones. The shares had an aggregate value of $150,000.

The shares of common stock were issued in a transaction not involving a public offering in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

 

During the period commencing October 1, 2017 throughfiscal year ended September 30, 2018, the2021, there were no other unregistered sales of our securities that were not reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K or our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Repurchases

The Company received $271,900 from 16 investors pursuant to private placement agreements with the investors to purchase 339,875has not made any repurchases of shares or other units of any class of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.80 for each shareequity securities during the fourth quarter of common stock.the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

 

Item 6. [Reserved]

 2134 
Table of Contents 

 

In connection with the issuance of the March 23, 2018, Labrys Fund, LP Convertible Note, the Company issued to the Purchaser, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 100,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”). The agreement was amended on June 29, 2018 and as a result the returnable shares were no longer returnable. Consequently, the fair value of the returnable shares of $218,626 was charged to interest expense. On September 19, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $220,000 and $12,730, respectively was converted into 258,589 shares of the Company’s common stock. (See Note 8 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

In connection with the issuance of a the Auctus Fund, LLC Convertible Note, the Company issued to Auctus, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 150,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”). On September 21, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $225,000 and $5,474, respectively was converted into 256,082 shares of the Company’s common stock. Subsequent to September 30, 2018, as a result of the conversion the 137,500 returnable shares were returned to the Company and cancelled. (See Note 8 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

In connection with the issuance of a the EMA Financial, LLC Convertible Note, the Company issued to EMA, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 100,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”). Subsequent to September 30, 2018, the Company repaid all obligations under the note. As a result of the repayment the returnable shares were returned to treasury and cancelled on January 8, 2019. (See Note 8 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On September 11, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement with Regal Consulting, LLC for investor relations services. Under this agreement the Company agreed to issue 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock per month as compensation for services plus $20,000 per month in cash. As of September 30, 2018, the Company had issued 30,000 shares of its common stock in accordance with the agreement. Stock compensation of $55,100 was recorded as a result of the stock issued under the agreement.

Warrants Issued

On December 13, 2017, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 27,548 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $10,000 as a result of this exercise.

On January 1, 2018, the Company issued warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share to an advisor for business advisory services. The warrants were valued at $234,095 using the Black Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5 years, risk free interest rate of 2.01%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rate of 158%. The warrants vest evenly over the six-month service period ended September 30, 2018. 

On January 19, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 180,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.083 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $14,940 as a result of this exercise.

On January 19, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $5,445 as a result of this exercise.

On January 29, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 4,500 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $1,634 as a result of this exercise.

On February 8, 2018, an investor exercised 456,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.367 for each share of Common stock. The investor elected to use the cashless exercise option and as a result the Company issued 387,475 shares of common stock.

On May 10, 2018, Bryan Huber the Company’s Chief Operations Officer exercised warrants to purchase 1,353 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $1.50 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $2,030 as a result of this exercise.

22
Table of Contents

On June 15, 2018, the Company issued 116,600 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On July 23, 2018, an investor exercised 100,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The investor elected to use the cashless exercise option and as a result the Company issued 72,414 shares of common stock.

On August 1, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On August 6, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 9,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $3,267 as a result of this exercise.

On August 28, 2018, in connection with the Consulting agreement executed with Zero Positive, LLC Company issued warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share to an Zero Positive. The warrants were valued at $2,607,096 using the Black Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 10 years, risk free interest rate of 3.05%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rate of 191%. The warrants vest as follows: 300,000 warrants vested immediately, the balance vest evenly on the last day of each month over the forty-two months beginning August 31, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, 328,571 warrants had vested, and the Company recorded an expense of $951,797 during the year ended September 30, 2018. (See Note 10 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On September 20, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On September 21, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 to the audited financial statements for additional details.)

On September 28, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 15,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $5,445 as a result of this exercise.

On September 28, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 6,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $2,178 as a result of this exercise.

These securities were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The investor represented his intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view towards distribution. The investor was given adequate information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to the restricted stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

In June of 2017, our Board of Directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility with us, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote our success. Under the initial Plan, we were able to issue up to an aggregate total of 3,000,000 incentive or non-qualified options to purchase our common stock, or stock awards.

23
Table of Contents

Equity Compensation
Plans Not Approved by
the Shareholders
Number of Securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
Number of Securities
remaining available
for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
 (a)(b)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders     
November 18, 2015(1)180,000$0.33
March 12, 2015(2)3,000,000$0.083
March 12, 2015(3)180,000$0.083
March 18, 2015(4)285,000$0.363
January 22, 2016(5)450,000$0.367
January 1, 2018(6)100,000$0.80
The Plan319,206$1.182,680,794
Total4,514,206$0.172,680,794

(1)On November 4, 2014, we entered into a consulting agreement for grant writing services. Pursuant to this agreement the Company issued 180,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock valued at $0.33 per share or $60,000.

(2)On March 12, 2015, we issued warrants to officers and members of the board of directors as compensation for services performed.

The warrants were issued under the following terms; non-transferable, fully vested on March 31, 2015, expire ten years from the date of grant, strike price of $0.083 and become immediately exercisable upon the occurrence of a significant liquidating, restructuring or change of control event.

(3)On March 12, 2015, as compensation for his appointment, Mr. Patee was granted a non-statutory option to purchase 180,000 shares of common stock under the following terms: non-transferable, fully vest on March 31, 2015, expire five years from the date of grant, strike price of $0.083 and become immediately exercisable upon the occurrence of a significant liquidating, restructuring or change of control event.

(4)On March 18, 2015, we granted an option to purchase 285,000 shares of common stock to a consultant. The options were issued under the following terms; non-transferable, fully vest on March 31, 2015, expire ten years from the date of grant, strike price of $0.363 and become immediately exercisable upon the occurrence of a significant liquidating, restructuring or change of control event.

(5)On January 22, 2016, we issued warrants to purchase 450,000 shares of common stock to a Mr. Greg Gohlinghorst for business advisory services. The warrants were issued under the following terms: fully vest on January 31, 2016, expire five years from the date of grant and strike price of $0.367.

(6)On January 1, 2018, we issued warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share to an advisor for business advisory services.

24
Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

CertainThe following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections,and the notes to those statements relating tothat are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our business plans, objectives, expectations and expected operatingintentions. Actual results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaningtiming of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results toevents could differ materially from thethose anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors thata number of factors. We use words such as anticipate, estimate, plan, project, continuing, ongoing, expect, believe, intend, may, will, should, could, materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended September 30, 20182021 and 20172020

 

Revenues

We earned $578,635$49,438,115 in revenues during the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, as compared with $447,963$10,028,701 in revenues for the year ended September 30, 2017.2020.

 

Most of our revenue forFor the year ended September 30, 20182021, our revenue was inderived from cryptocurrency mining revenues, the formsale of equipment, solar panels, batteries, design, engineering, and construction revenueservices revenue. Income from our mining segment is a result of bitcoin mining activities in the CleanSpark side ofUnited States. Income from our business. This incomeEnergy segment is the result of contracts to sell switchgear equipment, perform engineering design, and construction servicesprovide software for distributed energy and microgrid systems. For the year ended September 30, 2021, we also generated services revenue from p2kLabs. We hope to generate more significant revenue from customers through the sale and licensing of our Software platforms and services in the future. We hope to have more news on these efforts in future reports. However, we are unable to estimate with any degree of certainty the amount of future revenues, if any, from existing or future software contracts. Also, we do not anticipate earning significant revenues from our Gasifier business until such time that we have fully developed our technology and are able to market our products.

 

Gross ProfitCosts and Expenses

We had costs and expenses of $78,015,168 for the year ended September 30, 2021, as compared with $25,171,817 for the year ended September 30, 2020.

Our cost of revenues were $390,774$13,964,711 for the year ended September 30, 2018 resulting in gross profit of $187,861,2021, as compared with cost of revenues of $296,295$7,907,849 for the year ended September 30, 2017 resulting in gross profits of $151,668.2020. 

 

Our cost of revenues in 20182021 was mainly the result of materials, subcontractorsmining energy costs, hosting fees, contract manufacturing expenses, and direct labor expense.hardware materials. Our cost of revenues in 2020 was mainly the result of contract manufacturing expenses and hardware materials.

Mining expenses incurred during the year ended September 30, 2021 is $4,889,996. It consisted mainly of energy costs and hosting fees paid to Coinmint.

Contract manufacturing expenses decreased to $3,926,060for the year ended September 30, 2021, from $6,704,075for the year ended 2020. Our manufacturing expense consisted of the cost of contract manufacturing of switchgear equipment.

 

 2535 
Table of Contents 

 

Material expenses

Hardware material purchases increased to $277,441$3,205,547 for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, from $121,982$824,665in hardware expenses forthe year ended 2017.September 30, 2020. Our materials expense for the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 consisted mainly of the cost of energy storage and solar panels and energy storage.panels.

 

Direct labor decreasedProfessional fees increased to $32,544$8,272,966 for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021 from $119,607 for the year ended 2017. Our direct labor expenses for the year ended September 30, 2018 consisted mainly of allocated payroll costs of employees and consultants.

Subcontractor expenses increased to $79,517 for the year ended September 30, 2018, from $35,951 for the year ended 2017. Our subcontractor expenses for the year ended September 30, 2018 consisted mainly of fees charged by subcontractors for installation of solar panels and energy storage.

Operating Expenses

We had operating expenses of $7,263,792 for the year ended September 30, 2018, as compared with $13,529,885 for the year ended September 30, 2017.

Professional fees increased to $1,271,005 for the year ended September 30, 2018 from $1,016,934$6,521,016 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our professional fees expenses for the year ended September 30, 20182021 consisted mainly of legal fees of $4,570,216, accounting and tax fees of $1,070,174 consulting fees of $564,612 paid to management of the Company, stock based compensation for$818,741, investor relations and external marketing consulting of $480,620, sales consulting of $50,019, legal fees of $28,910, investor relations consulting$959,717, director fees of $16,500, consulting for software$177,084, recruitment and data scienceconference fees of $34,722$251,183, subcontract fees of $185,980 and audit and review fees of $45,639. $214,100.

Our professional fees expenses for the year ended September 30, 2017 was $1,016,934 which2020 consisted mainly of consulting fees of $475,700$607,392 paid to management of the Company, stock basedstock-based compensation for consulting of $118,880,$2,265,194, sales consulting of $107,178,$278,547, legal fees of $82,495,$1,472,421, investor relations and external marketing consulting of $79,218,$725,347, director fees of $442,000, consulting for software and engineering of $78,166$82,031, accounting and tax fees of $186,969 and audit and review fees of $36,615.$135,060.

 

Payroll expenses increased to $1,579,197$25,355,684 for the year ended September 30, 20182021 from $264,063$6,813,641 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our payroll expenses for the year ended September 30, 20182021 consisted mainly of salary and wages expense of $557,576$17,624,078 and employee and officer stock basedstock-based compensation and related bonuses of $1,021,621.$7,731,605. Our payroll expenses for the year ended September 30, 20172020 consisted mainly of salary and wages expense of $264,063.$4,293,559 and employee and officer stock-based compensation of $2,520,083.

 

General and administrative fees decreasedincreased to $279,679 $5,291,652for the year ended September 30, 20182021 from $365,819$1,093,062 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 20182021 consisted mainly of marketing related expenses of $1,488,933, travel expenses of $46,364,$367,632, rent expenses of $54,559$445,944, insurance expenses of $37,514,$720,053, dues and subscriptions of $60,575$1,129,963, repairs and maintenance of $174,192, supplies of $134,163, utilities of $184,232 and bad debt expense of $11,100.$246,453. Our general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 20172020 consisted mainly of travel expenses of $101,564,$82,407, rent expenses of $49,556$117,223, insurance expenses of $50,952.$232,043, dues and subscriptions of $362,887, marketing related expenses of $153,091, and bad debt expense of $36,924.

 

Product developmentDepreciation and amortization expense increased to $1,375,650$12,244,368 for the year ended September 30, 20182021, from $1,067,556$2,836,249 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.2020.

Impairment expenses were recorded for the year ended September 30, 2021 for $12,885,776, and no impairment expenses were recorded for the same period ended September 30, 2020. Impairment expense for the year ended September 30, 2021 consisted primarily of bitcoin impairment of $6,608,076, goodwill impairment of $5,723,388 and software impairment of $554,322, which represents a write down of our GridFabric product line of $250,000 and our mVSO platform of $304,322.

Other Income/Expenses

We had net other income of $6,765,043 for the year ended September 30, 2021, compared with other expenses of $8,203,027 for the year ended September 30, 2020. Other income for the year ended September 30, 2021 consisted mainly of other income of $544,778, change in fair value of contingent consideration of $84,198, gains on derivative assets of $2,790,387, realized gains on the sale of digital currency of $3,104,378, realized gains on the sale of equity securities  of $179,046, interest income of $221,488 and interest expense of $154,079. Our product development other income/expenses for the year ended September 30, 20182020 consisted mainly of amortizationother income of capitalized software$20,000, unrealized gains on equity security and derivative security of $1,379,483. Our product development expenses for the year ended September 30, 2017 consisted mainly$116,868 and $2,115,269 respectively, interest income of amortization of capitalized software of $1,067,556.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $854,981 for the year ended September 30, 2018 from $2,250,784 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.

Impairment expenses decreased to $1,896,090 for the year ended September 30, 2018 from $8,551,321 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.

Loss on disposal of assets expenses decreased to $0 for the year ended September 30, 2018 from $12,817 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.

26
Table of Contents

Other Income/Expenses

We had other expenses of $39,930,234 for the year ended September 30, 2018, compared with other expenses of $120,309 for the year ended September 30, 2017. Our other expenses for the year ended September 30, 2018 consisted mainly of loss on settlement of debts of $41,092, loss on derivative liability of $38,964,688,$308,804, and interest expense of $924,454. Our other expenses for the year ended September 30, 2017 consisted mainly of loss on settlement of debts of $117,414, and interest expense of $2,895.$10,758,750.

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended September 30, 20182021 was $47,006,165$21,812,010 compared to net loss of $13,498,526$23,346,143 for the year ended September 30, 2017.2020.

36
Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Measures

Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EPS is not a measurement of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. Because of varying available valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of equity instruments that can impact a company's non-cash operating expenses, CleanSpark management believes that providing a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes non-cash and non-recurring expenses allows for meaningful comparisons between the Company's core business operating results and those of other companies, as well as providing the Company with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating its own core business operating results over different periods of time.

The Company's adjusted EBITDA measure may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in its industry, as other companies in its industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently, particularly related to non-recurring, unusual items. The Company's adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or as an indication of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP. Our management does not consider adjusted EBITDA to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial results.

We are providing supplemental financial measures for (i) non-GAAP adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, or (“adjusted EBITDA”) that excludes the impact of interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, our share-based compensation expense, and impairment of assets, unrealized gains/losses on securities, certain financing costs, other non-cash items, certain non-recurring expenses, and impacts related to discontinued operations; and (ii) non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP earnings per share that excludes the impact of interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, our share-based compensation expense, and impairment of assets, unrealized gains/losses on securities, certain financing costs, other non-cash items, and impacts related to discontinued operations. These supplemental financial measures are not measurements of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and, as a result, these supplemental financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures internally to help understand, manage, and evaluate our business performance and to help make operating decisions.

We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are also useful to investors and analysts in comparing our performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. The first supplemental financial measure excludes (i) impacts of interest, taxes, and depreciation; (ii) significant non-cash expenses such as our share-based compensation expense, unrealized gains/losses on securities, certain financing costs, other non-cash items that we believe are not reflective of our general business performance, and for which the accounting requires management judgment, and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies; (iii) significant impairment losses related to long-lived and digital assets, which include our bitcoin for which the accounting requires significant estimates and judgment, and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies; and (iv) and impacts related to discontinued operations that would not be applicable to our future business activities.

Non-GAAP financial measures are subject to material limitations as they are not in accordance with, or a substitute for, measurements prepared in accordance with GAAP. For example, we expect that share-based compensation expense, which is excluded from the first two non-GAAP financial measures, will continue to be a significant recurring expense over the coming years and is an important part of the compensation provided to certain employees, officers, and directors.

We have also excluded impairment losses on assets, including impairments of our digital currency our non-GAAP financial measures, which may continue to occur in future periods as a result of our continued holdings of significant amounts of bitcoin. Our non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation and should be read only in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. We rely primarily on such Consolidated Financial Statements to understand, manage, and evaluate our business performance and use the non-GAAP financial measures only supplementally.

37
Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of our non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable financial measure stated in accordance with GAAP, which excludes the impact of (i) interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization; (ii) our share-based compensation expense; (iii) impairment expense; (iv) unrealized gains/losses on securities; (v) and (vi) impacts related to discontinued operations, to its most directly comparable GAAP measures for the periods indicated:

  Years Ended September 30,
  2021 2020
Reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA    
Net Loss: $(21,812,010) $(23,346,143)
Interest and taxes  (67,409)  10,449,946
Depreciation and amortization  12,244,368   2,836,249
        
Share-based compensation expense  8,546,712   2,053,232
Digital asset impairment losses  6,608,076   — 
Energy & other goodwill impairment losses  6,277,710   — 
Unrealized (gains)/losses of securities and derivatives  (2,785,234)  (2,232,137)
Discontinued operations  —    — 
non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA  9,012,213   (10,238,853)

The following is a reconciliation of our non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA earnings per share, in each case excluding the impact of (i) interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization; (ii) our share-based compensation expense; (iii) impairment expense; (iv) unrealized gains/losses on securities; (v) certain financing costs and other non-cash items; (vi) certain non-recurring expenses; and (vii) impacts related to discontinued operations:

     
Reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA per share:    
Non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA $9,012,213  $(10,238,853)
Interest and taxes (per diluted share)  —    1.09
Depreciation and amortization (per share)  0.42   0.30
Share-based compensation expense  0.29   0.21
Digital asset impairment losses (per share)  0.22   — 
Energy & other goodwill impairment losses  0.21   — 
Unrealized (gains)/losses of securities and derivatives (per share)  (0.09)  (0.23)
Discontinued operations  —    — 
Non-GAAP EBITDA per share $0.31  $(1.07)

38
Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of fair market value of our digital currency holdings to the current carrying value at September 30, 2021. We did not hold any digital currency as of September 30, 2020:

  Carrying Value (1) Fair Market Value (2)
Number of Bitcoins held $627  $627
Value per coin (1) (2)  37,645   43,929
Total $23,603,415  $27,543,483

(1) Value per coin is the average book value per coin determined by the number of coins held as of the balance sheet date divided by the carrying value.

(2) Value per coin is the quoted market price as of the balance sheet date.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

For the year ended September 30, 2021, our primary sources of liquidity came from existing cash and proceeds from share offerings. On March 18, 2021, the Company consummated a fully underwritten public offering of shares of its common stock, which resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $187,200,000. On June 3, 2021, the Company entered into an At the Market Offering Agreement (the “ATM”) with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“HCW”), pursuant to which it may, from time to time, offer and sell up to an aggregate of $500,000,000 of shares of its common stock to or through HCW. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,443,379 shares of the Company’s common stock under the ATM for net proceeds of $46.4 million. The shares were sold pursuant to a prospectus dated March 15, 2021 and a prospectus supplement dated June 3, 2021 filed with the SEC. Based on our current plans and business conditions, we believe that existing cash, cash generated from operations and our ATM will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash requirements until we reach profitability, and we are not aware of any trends or demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to result in a decrease in liquidity of our assets. However, our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of our sales and marketing, the timing of new product introductions and the continuing market acceptance of our products and services. If cash generated from operations is insufficient to satisfy our capital requirements, we may open a revolving line of credit with a bank, or we may have to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain credit facilities. In the event such financing is needed in the future, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available to us, or, if available, that it will be in amounts and on terms acceptable to us. If cash flows from operations became insufficient to continue operations at the current level, and if no additional financing was obtained, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

As of September 30, 2018,2021, we had total current assets of $548,380,$57,726,321, consisting of cash, accounts receivable, costs in excess of billings andinventory, digital currency, investments, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and total assets in the amount of $17,555,662.$317,473,121. Our total current liabilities as of September 30, 20182021 were $1,349,587.$10,063,022. We had a working capital deficitsurplus of $801,207$47,663,299 as of September 30, 2018.2021.

 

Operating activities used $1,260,521$35,429,342 in cash for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, as compared with $1,361,865$6,642,734 for the same period ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our net loss of $47,006,165$21,812,010 was the main component of our negative operating cash flow for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, offset mainly by stock-based compensation of $8,546,712, impairment expense of $1,896,090,$12,885,786 and depreciation and amortization of $854,981, loss on derivative liability of $38,964,688, amortization of capitalized software of $1,379,483 and stock based compensation of $1,502,241.$12,244,368. Our net loss of $13,498,526$23,346,143 was the main component of our negative operating cash flow for the year ended September 30, 2017,2020, offset mainly by impairment expenseamortization of $8,551,321,debt discount of $9,010,547, depreciation and amortization of $2,672,331, shares issued as interest of $2,050,000, amortization of capitalized software of $1,067,556$163,918 and depreciation and amortizationstock-based compensation of $2,250,784.$2,053,232.

 

Cash flows used by investing activities during the year ended September 30, 20182021 was $419,232,$217,714,926, as compared with $126,320$2,383,623 for the year ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our investment in the capitalized softwareacquisitions of $396,090,Solar watt Solutions for$1,000,136, purchase of fixed assets of $15,227$139,234,948, and the purchasedeposits on mining equipment of intangible assets of $7,915$87,959,910 were the main components of our negative investing cash flow for the year ended September 30, 2018. Our2021. The negative cash flow from investing activities is offset by sale of digital currencies of $11,443,132, acquisition of ATLData Center, net of cash received of $45,783 and sale of equity securities of $373,121.

For the year ended September 30, 2020, our investment in the capitalized software of $93,723 and the$84,924, acquisition of P2K Labs of $1,141,990, acquisition of Grid Fabric of $371,812, purchase of intangiblefixed assets of $28,919$34,897, and investment in equity and debt security of $750,000 were the main components of our negative investing cash flow for the year ended September 30, 2017.flow.

 

Cash flows provided by financing activities during the year ended September 30, 20182021 amounted to $2,035,402,$268,058,393, as compared with $1,108,784$4,313,702 for the year ended September 30, 2017.2020. Our positive cash flows from financing activities for the year ended September 30, 20182021 consisted of $271,900$270,656,118 in proceeds from offerings, $3,750,932 in proceeds from the saleexercise of common stock, $672,500 in proceeds from promissory notes, $837,750 in proceeds from convertible noteswarrants  and $382,790 from related party debts off-setoptions offset by repayments of $101,143$5,882,553 on promissory notes and repayments of $73,333 on related party debts.$288,602 in finance leases. Our positive cash flows from financing activities for the year ended September 30, 20172020 consisted mainly of $880,000$4,000,000 in proceeds from the sale of common stock, $150,000$531,169 in proceeds from long term loans and $80,000 from related party debt.promissory notes offset by repayments of $217,467 on promissory notes.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the new guidance requires enhanced disclosures about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including revenue recognition policies to identify performance obligations, assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain and fulfill a contract, and significant judgments in measurement and recognition.

 2739 
Table of Contents 

 

Contractual Obligations

The Company has purchase commitments for approximately $203.6 million related to purchase of miners as of September 30, 2021, and the Company has paid $144.7 million towards these commitments as of the end of this period.

The Company has purchase commitments for infrastructure assets and other mining equipment of approximately $6,512,000 as of September 30, 2021 and the Company has paid $4,576,000 towards these commitments duringthis period.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our obligations to make contractual future payments towards our agreements as of September 30, 2021:

 20222023202420252026ThereafterTotal
Recorded contractual obligations:       
Operating lease obligations$316,908$324,948$333,234$341,767$299,039$50,659$1,666,555
Finance Lease obligations   449,431   321,887   142,428     12,320       1,853             —   927,919
Miner equipment58,930,880     58,930,880
Infrastructure assets1,936,000     1,936,000
Total$61,633,219$646,835$475,662$354,087$300,892$50,659$63,461,354

Contingent consideration

GridFabric: On August 31, 2020, the Company acquired GridFabric, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, additional shares of the Company’s common stock valued at up to $750,000 were issuable if GridFabric achieves certain revenue and product release milestones. On September 30, 2021, the contingent consideration was re-measured to $500,000.

Subsequent to September 30, 2021, the Company settled all contingent consideration due to GridFabric resulting in the issuance of 8,404 shares of Company common stock valued at $150,000.

Solar Watt Solutions: On February 24, 2021, the Company acquired Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, additional cash consideration of up to $2,500,000 and up to 310,018 shares of the Company’s common stock may be payable if Solar Watt Solutions achieves certain revenue milestones. As of September 30 2021, none of the contingent consideration had been earned.

Known Trends or Uncertainties

Although we have not seen any significant reduction in revenues to date, we have seen some consolidation in our industry during economic downturns. These consolidations have not had a negative effect on our total sales; however, should consolidations and downsizing in the industry continue to occur, those events could adversely impact our revenues and earnings going forward.

As discussed in the Risk Factors section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the world has been affected due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Until the pandemic has passed, there remains uncertainty as to the effect of COVID-19 on our business in both the short and long-term.

We believe that the need for improved productivity in the research and development activities directed toward developing new products and/or software will continue to result in increasing adoption of energy solution tools such as those we produce. New product and/or software developments in the energy business segment could result in increased revenues and earnings if they are accepted by our markets; however, there can be no assurances that new products and/or software will result in significant improvements to revenues or earnings. For competitive reasons, we do not disclose all of our new product development activities.

Our continued quest for acquisitions could result in a significant change to revenues and earnings if one or more such acquisitions are completed.

The potential for growth in new markets is uncertain. We will continue to explore these opportunities until such time as we either generate sales or determine that resources would be more efficiently used elsewhere.

40
Table of Contents

Inflation

We have not been affected materially by inflation during the periods presented, and no material effect is expected in the near future.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2015,October 2021, the FASB madeissued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, which requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a decisionbusiness combination to deferbe recognized and measured by the acquirer on the acquisition date in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as if it had originated the contracts. Under the current business combinations guidance, such assets and liabilities are recognized by the acquirer at fair value on the acquisition date. This new guidance is effective date offor the Company for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2023 and interim periods within that fiscal year, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating its potential impact but does not expect the new standard for one year and permit early adoption asto have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the originalEffects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance (collectively, “Topic 848”). Topic 848 became effective date.immediately and expires on December 21, 2022. Topic 848 allows eligible contracts that are modified to be accounted for as a continuation of those contracts, permits companies to preserve their hedging accounting during the transition period and enables companies to make a one-time election to transfer or sell held-to-maturity debt securities that are affected by rate reform. Topic 848 provides optional expedients and exceptions for contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The adoption of ASU 2020-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

The Company adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments on October 1, 2020 (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a new standardforward-looking “expected loss” model that reflects expected credit losses, including credit losses related to trade receivables, and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates, which generally will result in the earlier recognition of allowances for losses. As the Company was a Smaller Reporting Company at the time of issuance of the ASU, the Company expects to adopt the ASU effective October 1, 2023, including the interim periods within the fiscal year. In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (subtopic 815-40),” which reduces the number of accounting models in ASC 470-20 that require separate accounting for embedded conversion features. As a result, a convertible debt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost as long as no other features require bifurcation and recognition as derivatives. By removing those separation models, the effective interest rate of convertible debt instruments will be closer to the coupon interest rate. Further, the diluted net income per share calculation for convertible instruments will require the Company to use the if-converted method. The treasury stock method should no longer be used to calculate diluted net income per share for convertible instruments. The amendment will be effective for the Company as of Octoberwith annual periods beginning January 1, 2018.2022 and early adoption is permitted. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this standard on its revenue recognition policy and doesASU 2020-06 is not believe it willexpected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

In August 2020, the FASB issued Account Standard Update (“ASU”) 2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (subtopic 815-40),” which reduces the number of accounting models in ASC 470-20 that require separate accounting for embedded conversion features. As a result, a convertible debt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost as long as no other features require bifurcation and recognition as derivatives. By removing those separation models, the effective interest rate of convertible debt instruments will be closer to the coupon interest rate. Further, the diluted net income per share calculation for convertible instruments will require the Company to use the if-converted method. The treasury stock method should no longer be used to calculate diluted net income per share for convertible instruments. The amendment will be effective for the Company with annual periods beginning January 1, 2022 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2020-06 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.statements or disclosures.

 

The Company has evaluated all other recent accounting pronouncements and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “criticalcritical accounting polices”policies in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “criticalcritical accounting policy”policy is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’sCompany’s financial condition and results, and requires management’smanagements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

 

Our accounting policies are discussed in detail in the footnotes to our financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021 however we consider our critical accounting policies to be those related to revenue recognition, long-lived assets, accounts receivable, fair value of financial instruments, cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, warranty liabilitydigital currency and stock-based compensation.

 

Our significant estimates include estimates used to review the Company’s goodwill and digital currency impairment, intangible assets acquired, impairments and estimations of long-lived assets, revenue recognition on percentage of completion type contracts, revenue recognition from digital currency mining, valuation of derivative assets and liabilities, available-for-sale investments, allowances for uncollectible accounts, valuation of digital currencies, valuation of contingent consideration, warranty, and the valuations of share based awards.  The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions including, but not limited to, the ultimate impact that COVID-19 may have on the Company’s operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of September 30, 2018,2021, there were no off balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements.

 

41
Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

A smaller reporting company isAs a first time large accelerated filer, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.Item until the first quarter after the fiscal year in which it is first determined that we have become a large accelerated filer.

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

 

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

F-1ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - 2018
F-2F-5Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm - 2017
F-3Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20182021 and 2017;2020;
F-4F-6Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017;2020;
F-5F-7Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020
F-6F-8Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017;2020;
F-7F-9Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 2842 
Table of Contents 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

CleanSpark, Inc.

Bountiful, Utah

 

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of CleanSpark, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of September 30, 2018,2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended September 30, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2018,2021 and 2020, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended September 30, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated December 14, 2021 expressed an adverse opinion.

 

Basis for Opinion

TheseThe Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, are the responsibilityfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the Company’s management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that responds to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-1
Table of Contents

Evaluation of the Accounting for and Disclosure of Digital Currency Held

As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s digital currency held as of September 30, 2021, which mainly consist of Bitcoin, are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets, and have been included in current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s digital currency as of September 30, 2021 amounted to approximately $23,603,000. We identified the accounting for and disclosure of the digital currency held as a critical audit matter because, currently, no specific definitive guidance exists for the accounting for and disclosure of digital currencies held in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The Company’s management has exercised significant judgment in their determination of how existing GAAP should be applied to the accounting for its digital currency held, the associated financial statement presentation and accompanying footnote disclosures.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

·Evaluated management’s rationale for the application of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 to account for its digital currency held and examined management’s processes for determining the amount of impairment expense recognized;
·Evaluated management’s rationale for the inclusion of digital currency as a current asset on the balance sheet;
·Independently and directly confirmed the balance and ownership of digital currency that is in the custody of a third party;
·Evaluated management’s disclosures of its digital currency activities in the financial statement footnotes; and
·Examined supporting sale and cash receipt evidence for digital currency sales, including management’s processes for calculating any gains or losses on sales of its digital currency.

Evaluation of the Accounting for and Disclosure of Digital Currency Mining Revenue Recognized

As disclosed in Note 2, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company provides computing power to the mining pools and in exchange for providing such computing power, the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the pool operator receives for successfully adding a block to the blockchain, plus a fractional share of the transaction fees attached to that block. The Company’s fractional share is based on the proportion of computing power the Company contributed to the mining pool operator to the total computing power contributed by all mining pool participants in solving the current algorithm. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company recognized net digital currency mining revenue of approximately $38,846,000. We identified the accounting for and disclosure of digital currency mining revenue recognized as a critical audit matter because, currently, no specific definitive guidance exists for the accounting for and disclosure of digital currency mining revenue recognized in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s management has exercised significant judgment in their determination of how existing GAAP should be applied to the accounting for and disclosure of digital currency mining revenue recognized.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

·Performed a site visitation of the facility where the Company’s mining hardware is located. The visitation included an observation of the physical and environmental controls and mining equipment inventory observation procedures;
·Evaluated management’s rationale for the application of ASC 606 to account for digital currency awards earned;
·Evaluated management’s disclosures of its digital currency activities in the financial statement footnotes;
·Evaluated and tested management’s rationale and supporting documentation associated with the valuation of digital currency awards earned;
·Independently confirmed certain financial data and wallet records directly with the mining pools;
·Compared the Company’s wallet records of digital currency mining compensation received to publicly available blockchain records; and
·Undertook an analytical review of total digital currency mining revenue expected to be recognized by the Company by assessing the total hash power contributed onto the network by the Company against total block rewards and transaction fees issued over the year.

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018.

Houston, Texas

December 14, 2021

F-2
Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

CleanSpark, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of CleanSpark, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of September 30, 2021 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to any corrective actions taken by the Company after the date of management’s assessment.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 and for the years then ended and our report dated December 14, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

The Company acquired ATL Data Centers LLC and Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. (collectively, the “Acquired Businesses”) during the year ended September 30, 2021, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2021, the Acquired Businesses’ internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $267.3 million (of which $27.3 million represents goodwill and intangibles included within the scope of the assessment), and total revenues of $43.2 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended September 30, 2021. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of the Acquired Businesses.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting (“Management’s Report”). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of itseffective internal control over financial reporting. As partreporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of our audit we are required to obtaininternal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not forassessing the purposerisk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of expressing an opinioninternal control based on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.assessed risk. Our audit also included evaluatingperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

F-3
Table of Contents

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment: (1) the Company did not adequately implement or properly maintain controls over its financial close and reporting process, its process over the recording of energy and other services revenue and its process over the accounting and valuation of certain aspects of business combinations involving significant estimates and (2) the Company did not adequately design and maintain effective general information technology controls over third-party information systems and applications that are relevant to the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2021 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report on those financial statements.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018.

Houston, Texas

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

F-1
Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Cleanspark, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cleanspark, Inc. as of September 30, 2017 the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. Cleanspark, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cleanspark, Inc. as of September 30, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has limited revenues, has negative working capital at September 30, 2017, has incurred recurring losses and recurring negative cash flow from operating activities, and has an accumulated deficit which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ AMC Auditing

AMC Auditing

Las Vegas, Nevada

January 15, 2018

F-2
Table of Contents

CLEANSPARK, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

   September 30, 2018   September 30, 2017
ASSETS      
Current assets       
Cash $412,777  $57,128
Accounts receivable  34,141   41,947
Cost in excess of billings  52,439   —  
Prepaid expense and other current assets  49,023   29,556
Total current assets  548,380   128,631
        
Fixed assets, net  86,731   125,441
Capitalized Software, net  8,786,226   9,709,444
Intangible assets, net  3,214,467   5,903,686
Goodwill  4,919,858   4,919,858
Deposits  —     5,742
        
Total assets $17,555,662  $20,792,802
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY       
Current liabilities       
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $131,724  $143,225
Convertible notes, net of unamortized discounts  69,121   —  
Customer deposits  —     16,000
Due to related parties  308,373   61,021
Loans from related parties  382,790   73,333
Loans payable, net of unamortized discounts  457,579   7,712
Total current liabilities  1,349,587   301,291
        
Long- term liabilities       
Loans payable  150,000   150,000
        
Total liabilities  1,499,587   451,291
        
Stockholders' equity       
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 36,116,447 and 33,409,471 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and  September 30, 2017, respectively  36,116   33,409
 Preferred stock;  $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively  1,000   1,000
Additional paid-in capital  82,958,490   40,240,468
Accumulated earnings (deficit)  (66,939,531)  (19,933,366)
Total stockholders' equity  16,056,075   20,341,511
        
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $17,555,662  $20,792,802

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3
Table of Contents

CLEANSPARK, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

  For the Years Ended
  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
     
Revenues, net $578,635  $447,963
        
Cost of revenues  390,774   296,295
        
Gross profit  187,861   151,668
        
Operating expenses       
Professional fees  1,271,005   1,016,934
Payroll expenses  1,579,197   264,063
Product development  1,375,650   1,067,556
Research and development  7,190   591
General and administrative expenses  279,679   365,819
Loss on disposal of assets  —     12,817
Impairment expense  1,896,090   8,551,321
Depreciation and amortization  854,981   2,250,784
Total operating expenses  7,263,792   13,529,885
        
Loss from operations  (7,075,931)  (13,378,217)
        
Other income (expense)      
Loss on settlement of debt  (41,092)  (117,414)
Loss on derivative liability  (38,964,688)  —  
Interest expense  (924,454)  (2,895)
Total other income (expense)  (39,930,234)  (120,309)
        
Net loss $(47,006,165) $(13,498,526)
        
Basic loss per common share $(1.36) $(0.42)
        
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  34,517,986   32,182,107

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 F-4 
Table of Contents 

 

CLEANSPARK, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITYBALANCE SHEETS

  Preferred Stock Common Stock   
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-in Capital Accumulated Deficit Total Stockholders' Deficit
Balance, September 30, 2016  1,000,000  $1,000   27,834,415  $27,834  $39,068,127  $(6,434,840) $32,662,121
                            
Shares issued for services  —     —     —     —     —     —     —  
Options and warrants issued for services  —     —     —     —     16,666   —     16,666
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants  —     —     4,399,056   4,399   (4,399)  —     —  
Shares issued for direct investment  —     —     1,101,000   1,101   878,899   —     880,000
Shares issued for settlement of debt  —     —     50,000   50   212,450   —     212,500
Shares and warrants issued to acquire assets  —     —     —     —     —     —     —  
Preferred Shares issued for services  —     —     25,000   25   68,725   —     68,750
Net loss  —     —     —     —     —     (13,498,526)  (13,498,526)
Balance, September 30, 2017  1,000,000   1,000   33,409,471   33,409   40,240,468   (19,933,366)  20,341,511
                            
Shares issued for services  —     —     30,000   30   55,070   —     55,100
Options and warrants issued for services  —     —     —     —     1,507,418   —     1,507,418
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants  —     —     718,290   718   44,220   —     44,938
Commitment and returnable shares issued with debt  —     —     762,500   763   547,765   —     548,528
Shares issued for direct investment  —     —     339,875   340   271,560   —     271,900
Shares issued for settlement of debt  —     —     514,671   514   462,690   —     463,204
Fair value of tainted warrants reclassified to derivative liability  —     —     —     —     (12,537,117)  —     (12,537,117)
Resolution of derivative liability  —     —     —     —     52,291,024   —     52,291,024
Shares issued to escrow as collateral  —     —     300,000   300   (300)  —     —  
Shares issued as settlement of accounts payable  —     —     41,640   42   75,692   —     75,734
Net loss  —     —     —     —     —     (47,006,165)  (47,006,165)
Balance, September 30, 2018  1,000,000  $1,000   36,116,447  $36,116  $82,958,490  $(66,939,531) $16,056,075

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
ASSETS    
Current assets       
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash $18,040,327  $3,126,202
Accounts receivable, net  2,619,957   859,791
Contract assets       4,103
Inventory  2,672,744   247,500
Prepaid expense and other current assets  5,129,047   938,993
Digital currency  23,603,210     
Derivative investment asset  4,905,656   2,115,269
Investment equity security  260,772   460,000
Investment debt security, AFS, at fair value  494,608   500,000
Total current assets  57,726,321   8,251,858
        
Property and equipment, net  137,592,871   117,994
Operating lease right of use asset  1,488,240   40,711
Capitalized software, net  503,685   976,203
Intangible assets, net  12,277,360   7,049,656
Deposits on mining equipment  87,959,910     
Other long-term asset  875,536     
Goodwill  19,049,198   5,903,641
        
Total assets  317,473,121   22,340,063
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY       
Current liabilities       
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  7,975,263   4,527,037
Contract liabilities  296,964   64,198
Operating lease liability  256,195   41,294
Finance lease liability  413,798     
Acquisition liability  300,000     
Contingent consideration  820,802   750,000
Total current liabilities  10,063,022   5,382,529
        
Long-term liabilities       
Loans payable       531,169
Operating lease liability, net of current portion  1,235,325     
Finance lease liability, net of current portion  458,308     
Total liabilities  11,756,655   5,913,698
        
Stockholders' equity       
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 37,395,945 and 17,390,979 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively  37,394   17,391
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; Series A shares; 2,000,000 authorized; 1,750,000 and 1,750,000 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 respectively  1,750   1,750
Additional paid-in capital  444,074,832   132,809,830
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (5,392)    
Accumulated deficit  (138,392,118)  (116,402,606)
Total stockholders' equity  305,716,466   16,426,365
        
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity  317,473,121   22,340,063

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-5 
Table of Contents 

CLEANSPARK, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSOPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

        
  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Revenues, net       
Digital currency mining revenue, net  38,846,633   0  
Energy hardware, software and services revenue  9,002,636   9,018,023
Other services revenue  1,588,846   1,010,678
    Total revenues, net  49,438,115   10,028,701
        
Costs and expenses       
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)  13,964,711   7,907,849
Professional fees  8,272,967   6,521,016
Payroll expenses  25,355,684   6,813,641
General and administrative expenses  5,291,652   1,093,062
Impairment of goodwill  5,723,388     
Other impairment expense (related to Intangible Assets)  7,162,398     
Depreciation and amortization  12,244,368   2,836,249
  Total costs and expenses  78,015,168   25,171,817
        
Loss from operations  (28,577,053)  (15,143,116)
        
Other income/(expense)       
Other income  544,778   20,000
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  84,198     
Realized gain on sale of digital currency  3,104,378     
Realized gain on sale of equity securities  179,046     
Unrealized gain (loss) on equity security  (5,153)  116,868
Unrealized gain on derivative security  2,790,387   2,115,269
Interest income  221,488   308,804
Interest expense  (154,079)  (10,758,750)
Loss on disposal of assets       (5,218)
  Total other income (expense)  6,765,043   (8,203,027)
        
Loss before income tax (expense) or benefit  (21,812,010)  (23,346,143)
 Income tax (expense) or benefit         
 Net loss  (21,812,010)  (23,346,143)
        
 Other comprehensive loss  (5,392)    
 Total comprehensive loss  (21,817,402)  (23,346,143)
        
Preferred stock dividends  177,502     
        
Total comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders  (21,994,904)  (23,346,143)
        
Loss per common share - basic and diluted  (0.75)  (2.44)
        
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  29,441,364   9,550,626

  For the Years Ended
  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Cash Flows from Operating Activities       
Net loss $(47,006,165) $(13,498,526)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:       
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  —     12,817
Stock based compensation  1,502,343   135,546
Impairment expense  1,896,090   8,551,321
Commitment shares issued with debt  218,626   —  
Depreciation and amortization  854,981   2,250,784
Amortization of capitalized software  1,379,483   1,067,556
Loss on derivative liability  38,964,688   —  
Loss on settlement of debt  41,092   117,414
Amortization of debt discount  638,090   —  
Changes in assets and liabilities       
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets  12,983   (21,964)
(Increase) decrease in deposits  5,742   (5,153)
Increase in costs in excess of billings  (52,439)  —  
Decrease in accounts receivable  7,806   15,148
Increase (decrease) in customer deposits  (16,000)  16,000
Increase in accounts payable  44,807   144
Increase (decrease) in due to related parties  247,352   (2,952)
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,260,521)  (1,361,865)
        
Cash Flows from investing       
Purchase of intangible assets  (7,915)  (28,919)
Purchase of fixed assets  (15,227)  (5,112)
Investment in microgrid assets  —     (5,566)
Investment in capitalized software  (396,090)  (93,723)
Cash received on sale of assets  —     7,000
Net cash used in investing activities  (419,232)  (126,320)
        
Cash Flows from Financing Activities       
Payments on promissory notes  (101,143)  (20,255)
Proceeds from promissory notes  672,500   25,706
Proceeds from related part debts  382,790   80,000
Payments on related party debts  (73,333)  (6,667)
Proceeds from convertible debt, net of issuance costs  837,750   —  
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  44,938   —  
Proceeds from long term loans  —     150,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock  271,900   880,000
Net cash from financing activities  2,035,402   1,108,784
        
Net increase (decrease) in Cash  355,649   (379,401)
        
Beginning cash balance  57,128   436,529
        
Ending cash balance $412,777  $57,128
        
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information       
Cash paid for interest $106,970  $1,629
Cash paid for tax $—    $—  
        
Non-Cash investing and financing transactions       
Cashless exercise of options $460  $4,399
Stock issued to settle accounts payable $75,734  $212,500
Shares issued on conversion of debt and interest $463,204  $—  
Financing of prepaid insurance $32,450  $—  
Debt discount on convertible debt $837,750  $—  
Debt discount on promissory notes $281,373  $—  
Shares issued and held in escrow as collateral $300  $—  
Recognition of derivative liability due to tainted equity instruments $12,537,117  $—  
Resolution of derivative liability reclassified to additional paid in capital $52,291,024  $—  
Option expense capitalized as software development costs $60,175  $—  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 F-6 
Table of Contents 

CLEANSPARK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


1. ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS

                                
  For the Year Ended September 30, 2021
   Preferred Stock   Common Stock                
   Shares    Amount    Shares   Amount    Additional Paid-in Capital    Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Loss
   Accumulated Deficit   Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, September 30, 2020  1,750,000   1,750   17,390,979   17,391   132,809,830        (116,402,606)  16,426,365
Shares issued for services            631,765   631   5,923,300             5,923,931
Exercise of options and warrants            389,745   389   3,750,542             3,750,931
Shares returned for settlement of debt            (15,000)  (15)  15               
Shares issued for business acquisition            976,828   996   15,783,376             15,784,372
Shares in Escrow for business acquisition            1,119,160   1,100   10,580,786             10,581,886
Options and warrants issued for services                      5,480,426             5,480,426
Shares issued under underwritten offering, net of offering costs            16,978,734   16,978   270,639,140             270,656,118
Shares returned in relation to business acquisition            (76,266)  (76)  (892,583)            (892,659)
Preferred stock dividends                                (177,502)  (177,502)
Net loss                               (21,812,010)  (21,812,010)
Other comprehensive loss                           (5,392)      (5,392)
Balance, September 30, 2021  1,750,000   1,750   37,395,945   37,394   444,074,832   (5,392)  (138,392,118)  305,716,466

  For the Year Ended September 30, 2020
   Preferred Stock   Common Stock                
   Shares    Amount    Shares   Amount    Additional Paid-in Capital    Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
   Accumulated Deficit   Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance, September 30, 2019  1,000,000  $1,000   4,679,018  $4,679  $111,936,125  $    $(93,056,463) $18,885,341
Shares issued for services  750,000   750   50,381   50   139,800             140,600
Options and warrants issued for services                      1,912,632             1,912,632
Shares issued upon conversion of debt and
accrued interest
            11,330,978   11,331   14,038,669             14,050,000
Rounding shares issued for stock split            793   1   (1)              
Shares returned and cancelled            (30,000)  (30)  30               
Options issued for business acquisition                      88,935             88,935
Shares issued for business acquisition            122,126   122   694,878             695,000
Shares issued upon exercise of warrants            6,913   7   (7)              
Shares issued under registered direct offering            1,230,770   1,231   3,998,769             4,000,000
Net loss                                (23,346,143)  (23,346,143)
Other comprehensive loss                                       
Balance, September 30, 2020  1,750,000   1,750   17,390,979   17,391   132,809,830        (116,402,606)  16,426,365

 

Organization

CleanSpark, Inc. (“we”, “our”, the "Company") was incorporated in the stateThe accompanying notes are an integral part of Nevada on October 15, 1987 as SmartData Corporation. SmartData conducted a 504-public offering in the State of Nevada in December 1987 and began trading publicly in January 1988. Due to a series of unfortunate events, including the untimely death of the founding CEO, SmartData discontinued active business operations in 1992.

On March 25, 2014, we began operations in the alternative energy sector.

In December 2014, the Company changed its name to Stratean Inc. through a short-form merger in order to better reflect the new business plan.

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement, as amended (the “Purchase Agreement”), with CleanSpark Holdings LLC, CleanSpark LLC, CleanSpark Technologies LLC and Specialized Energy Solutions, Inc. (together, the “Seller”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired CleanSpark, LLC and all the assets related to the Seller and its line of business and assumed $200,000 in liabilities.

In October 2016, the Company changed its name to CleanSpark, Inc. through a short-form merger in order to better reflect the brand identity.

Line of Business

Through the acquisition of CleanSpark, LLC, the Company provides microgrid solutions to military, commercial and residential properties.

The services offered consist of turn-key microgrid implementation services, microgrid design and engineering, project development consulting services and solar photovoltaic installation and consulting. The work is performed under fixed price bid contracts and negotiated price contracts. The Company performed all of its work in California during the year ended September 30, 2018.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of CleanSpark Inc. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’sthese consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Presentation

The Company has incurred losses for the past several years while developing infrastructure and its software platforms. As shown in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred net losses of $47,006,165 and $13,498,526 during the years ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively. Additionally, as of September 30, 2018, the Company had a working capital deficit of approximately $801,207. In response to these conditions, subsequent to September 30, 2018 we have raised additional capital through the sale of debt and equity securities pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3. (See Note 17 for additional details.)

TheCompany’sindependent registered public accounting firm expressed in its report on theCompany’sfinancial statements for the year ended September 30, 2017 a substantial doubt about theCompany’sability to continue as a going concern. Based onmanagement’splans and the capital raised subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2018, that substantial doubt has been alleviated.

 F-7 
Table of Contents 

CLEANSPARK, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

        
  For the Year Ended
  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities       
Net loss  (21,812,010)  (23,346,143)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:       
Stock based compensation including expenses in lieu of commission to brokers  8,546,712   2,053,232
Impairment expense on digital currency  6,608,076     
Unrealized gain on equity security  5,153   (116,868)
Digital currency issued for services  296,592     
Realized gain on sale of equity security  (179,046)    
Realized gain on digital currency  (3,104,378)    
Depreciation and amortization  12,244,368   2,836,249
Provision for bad debts  246,453   27,456
Gain on derivative asset  (2,790,387)  (2,115,269)
Gain on forgiveness of debt  (531,169)    
Change in fair value of contingent consideration  (84,198)   
Amortization of debt discount       9,010,547
Shares issued as interest       2,050,000
Loss on asset disposal       (5,218)
Impairment expense on capitalized software  554,322     
Impairment of Goodwill  5,723,388     
Noncash lease expense  321,758   44,569
Changes in operating assets and liabilities       
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets  (3,216,288)  275,452
Decrease in contract assets  4,103   52,974
Decrease in contract liabilities, net  146,128  (435,203)
(Increase) in accounts receivable  (2,011,250)  (21,664)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  5,006,403   3,415,168
(Increase) in digital currency  (38,846,633)    
(Decrease) in lease liability  (319,061)  (43,986)
Increase in inventory  (2,238,378)  (247,500)
(Decrease) in due to related parties       (86,966)
Net cash used in operating activities  (35,429,342)  (6,642,734)
        
Cash Flows from investing       
Increase in deposits on mining equipment  (89,260,010)    
Proceeds from sale of digital currencies  11,443,132     
Proceeds from sale of equity securities  373,121     
Investment in infrastructure development  (81,868)   —  
Purchase of property and equipment  (139,234,948)  (34,897)
Acquisition of ATL Data Center, net of cash received  45,783     
Acquisition of p2KLabs, net of cash received       (1,141,990)
Acquisition of Solar Watt Solutions  (1,000,136)    
Cash consideration for acquisition of GridFabric, net of cash acquired       (371,812)
Investment in capitalized software       (84,924)
Investment in debt and equity securities       (750,000)
Net cash used in investing activities  (217,714,926)  (2,383,623)
        
Cash Flows from Financing Activities       
Payments on promissory notes  (5,882,553)  (217,467)
Proceeds from promissory notes       531,169
Payments on finance leases  (288,602)    
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  3,750,932     
Proceeds from offerings, net  270,656,118   4,000,000
Dividend paid  (177,502)    
        
Net cash provided by financing activities  268,058,393   4,313,702
        
Net increase (decrease) in Cash  14,914,125   (4,712,655)
        
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, beginning of period  3,126,202   7,838,857
        
Cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, end of period  18,040,327   3,126,202
     
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information    
Cash paid for interest  156,204   14,162
Cash paid for tax         
        
Non-cash investing and financing transactions       
Day one recognition of right of use asset and liability  1,543,719   85,280
Remeasurement of right of use asset and liability due to lease modification  695,551     
Shares and options issued for business acquisition  25,473,675   783,935
Options issued for services  953,125   1,912,632
Shares issued for services  1,904,521   139,850
Shares issued for conversion of debt and accrued interest       14,050,000
Cashless exercise of warrants  74    7
Shares issued as collateral returned to treasury  15    30

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8

CLEANSPARK, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.    ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF BUSINESS

Organization

The Company – CleanSpark, Inc. (“CleanSpark,” “we,” “our,” "Company") was incorporated in the state of Nevada on October 15, 1987as SmartData Corporation. In October 2016, the Company changed its name to CleanSpark, Inc.

CleanSpark, Inc. is a bitcoin mining and diversified energy company incorporated in Nevada. The Company sustainably mines bitcoin and provides advanced energy technology solutions to commercial and residential customers to solve modern energy challenges. The Company, through itself and its wholly owned subsidiaries, has operated in the digital currency mining sector since December 2020, and in the alternative energy sector since March 2014.

CleanSpark, Inc. aims to develop a long-term sustainability and clean energy plan to support its bitcoin mining operations.

Lines of Business

Digital Currency Mining Segment

Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, ATL Data Centers LLC (“ATL”) and CleanBlok, Inc. (“CleanBlok”), the Company mines bitcoin. The Company entered the bitcoin mining industry through our acquisition of ATL in December 2020. It acquired a second data center in August 2021 and have had a co-location agreement with New York-based Coinmint in place since July 2021. Bitcoin mining has now become the Company’s principal revenue generating business activity. We currently intend to acquire additional facilities, equipment and infrastructure capacity to continue to expand our bitcoin mining operations.

Through our subsidiaries CSRE Properties Norcross, LLC and CSRE Property Management Company, LLC and CSRE Properties, LLC, we maintain real property holdings for ATL Data Centers LLC and CleanBlok Inc.

Energy Segment

The Company provides energy solutions throughour wholly owned subsidiaries CleanSpark, LLC, CleanSpark Critical Power Systems, Inc., GridFabric, LLC, and Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. These solutions consist of engineering, design and software solutions, custom hardware solutions, Open Automated Demand response (“OpenADR”), solar, energy storage for microgrid and distributed energy systems to military, commercial and residential customers in Southern California and throughout the world.

The Company’s solutions are supported by a proprietary suite of software solutions that include microgrid energy modeling, energy market communications and energy management solutions.

Other business activities

Through our wholly owned subsidiary p2kLabs, Inc., we provide design, software development, and other technology-based consulting services. The services provided are generally hourly or fixed-fee project-based arrangements.

Through ATL, we also provide traditional data center services, such as providing customers with rack space, power and equipment, and offer several cloud services including virtual services, virtual storage, and data backup services.

F-9

2.    SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Liquidity

The accompanying audited financial statements of the Company have been prepared by the Management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and have been filed with the SEC on December 14, 2021 (“Form 10-K”).

As shown in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $21,812,010 and $23,346,143 during the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively. While the Company has experienced negative cash flows from operations, the Company has sufficient capital to support its ongoing operations from cash flows provided from operational activities, including potential sale of digital currency, and has access to additional capital through the registered sale of equity securities pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-3. In addition, the Company is continuing to grow its business segments through which it expects to grow its working capital base. As of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, the Company had working capital of $47,663,299and $2,869,329, respectively.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CleanSpark, Inc., and its wholly owned operating subsidiaries, CleanSpark, LLC, CleanSpark II, LLC, CleanSpark Critical Power Systems Inc., p2kLabs, Inc, GridFabric, LLC, ATL Data Centers LLC, CleanBlok, Inc., CSRE Properties, LLC, Solar Watt Solutions, Inc, CSRE Properties Norcross, LLC and CleanSpark Acquisition, Inc.CSRE Property Management Company, LLC. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation of these entities.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The going concern basis of presentation assumes that the Company will continue in operation one year after the date these financial statements are issued and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The evaluation of going concern under the accounting guidance requires significant judgment which involves the Company to consider that it has historically incurred losses in recent years as it has prepared to grow its business through acquisition opportunities. The Company must also consider its current liquidity as well as future market and economic conditions that may be deemed outside the control of the Company as it relates to obtaining financing and generating future profits. As of September 30, 2021, the Company had approximately $18 millionof available cash on-hand and Bitcoin with a fair market value of $27.5 million. In determining whether there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the Company may consider the effects of any mitigating plans for additional sources of financing. The Company identified additional financing sources it believes are currently available to fund its operations and drive future growth that include (i) the ability to access capital using the at-the-market (“ATM”) equity offering program available to the Company whereby the Company may sell additional shares of its common stock (discussed in Note 11 – Stockholders’ Equity), and (ii) the ability to raise additional financing from other sources. (Refer to Note 11 for further details)

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atas of the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include estimates used to review the Company’s goodwill and digital currency impairment, intangible assets acquired, impairments and estimations of long-lived assets, revenue recognition on percentage of completion type contracts, revenue recognition from digital currency mining, valuation of derivative assets and liabilities, available-for-sale investments, allowances for uncollectible accounts, derivative instruments valuation of digital currencies, valuation of contingent consideration, warranty, and the valuations of non-cash capital stock issuances.share based awards.  The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.conditions including, but not limited to, the ultimate impact that COVID-19 may have on the Company’s operations.

F-10
Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition–The Company recognizes

We recognize revenue on arrangements in accordance with Securitiesgenerally accepted accounting principles as outlined in the Financial Accounting Standard Board's (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue From Contracts with Customers, which requires that five steps be followed in evaluating revenue recognition: (i) identify the contract with the customer; (ii) identity the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price; and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” and No. 104, “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases,(v) recognize revenue when or as the entity satisfied a performance obligation.

Our accounting policy on revenue recognition by type of revenue is recognizedprovided below.

Revenues from digital currency mining

The Company has entered in digital asset mining pools to provide computing power to the mining pools. The contracts are terminable at any time by either party and the Company’s enforceable right to compensation only begins when the Company starts providing computing power to the mining pool operator. In exchange for providing computing power, the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the mining pool operator receives (less net digital asset transaction fees to the mining pool operator), for successfully adding a block to the blockchain, , plus a fractional share of the transaction fees attached to that block.. The Company’s fractional share is based on the proportion of computing power the Company contributed to the mining pool operator to the total computing power contributed by all mining pool participants in solving the current algorithm. The transaction consideration the Company receives is noncash consideration, in the form of digital currency, which the Company measures at fair value on the date received which is not materially different than the fair value at contract inception or time the Company has earned the award from the mining pools. The consideration is dependent on the number of digital assets mined on any given day. Fair value of the digital currency award received is determined using the spot price of the related digital currency on the date earned.

There is fixed,currently no definitive guidance under GAAP or determinable, persuasive evidence ofalternative accounting framework for the accounting for digital currencies recognized as revenue or held, and management has exercised significant judgment in determining the appropriate accounting treatment. In the event authoritative guidance is enacted by the FASB, the Company may be required to change its policies, which could have an arrangement exists,effect on the service is performedCompany’s consolidated financial position and collectability is reasonably assured. Forresults from operations. The total revenue recognized from digital currency mining for the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017,September 30, 2020 is $38,846,633 and $0, respectively.

Engineering & Construction Contracts and Service Contracts

The Company recognizes engineering and construction contract revenue over time, as performance obligations are satisfied, due to the Company reported revenuescontinuous transfer of $578,635control to the customer. Engineering and $447,963, respectively.

Revenues and related costs on construction contracts are recognized usinggenerally accounted for as a single unit of account (a single performance obligation) and are not segmented between types of services. The Company recognizes revenue based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost (an input method). The input method is the “percentage of completion method” of accounting in accordance with ASC 605-35, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production Type Contracts (“ASC 605-35”). Under this method, contract revenues and related expenses are recognized over the performance periodmost faithful depiction of the contract in direct proportionCompany’s performance because it directly measures the value of the services transferred to the costs incurredcustomer. Customer-furnished materials, labor and equipment and, in certain cases, subcontractor materials, labor and equipment, are included in revenue and cost of revenue when management believes that the company is acting as a percentage ofprincipal rather than as an agent (i.e., the company integrates the materials, labor and equipment into the deliverables promised to the customer). Customer-furnished materials are only included in revenue and cost when the contract includes construction activity and the Company has visibility into the amount the customer is paying for the materials or there is a reasonable basis for estimating the amount. The Company recognizes revenue, but not profit, on certain uninstalled materials that are not specifically produced, fabricated, or constructed for a project. Revenue on these uninstalled materials is recognized when the cost is incurred (when control is transferred). Changes to total estimated costs for the entirety of the contract. Costs include direct material, direct labor, subcontract labor andcontract cost or losses, if any, allocable indirect costs. All un-allocable indirect costs and corporate general and administrative costs are charged to the periods as incurred. However, in the event a loss on a contract is foreseen, the Company will recognize the loss as it is determined.

Revisions in cost and profit estimates during the course of the contract are reflected in the accounting period in which the facts, which require the revision, become known.  Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined.  Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions, and final contract settlements may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which they are determined as assessed at the revisionscontract level. Pre-contract costs are determined.expensed as incurred unless they are expected to be recovered from the client. Project mobilization costs are generally charged to project costs as incurred when they are an integrated part of the performance obligation being transferred to the client. Customer payments on engineering and construction contracts are typically due within 30 to 45 days of billing, depending on the contract.

The Asset, “CostsCompany recognizes energy (solar panel and battery) installation contract revenue for residential customers at a point in time upon completion of the installation. The revenues associated with energy installations for commercial customers are recognized over a period of time as noted in the engineering and construction contract revenue disclosure above.

F-11
Table of Contents

For service contracts (including maintenance contracts) in which the Company has the right to consideration from the customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance completed to date, revenue is recognized when services are performed and contractually billable. Service contracts that include multiple performance obligations are segmented between types of services.

For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. Revenue recognized on service contracts that have not been billed to clients is classified as a current asset under contract assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts billed to clients in excess of billings”revenue recognized on service contracts to date are classified as a current liability under contract liabilities. Customer payments on service contracts are typically due within 30 days of billing, depending on the contract.

The total revenue recognized from sale of residential battery, residential solar and commercial solar for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 is $3,727,335 and $0, represents revenuesrespectively.

Revenues from Sale of Equipment

Performance Obligations Satisfied at a point in time.

We recognize revenue on agreements for equipment we sell on a standardized basis to the market at a point in time. We recognize revenue at the point in time that the customer obtains control of the good, which is generally upon shipment or when the customer has physical possession of the product depending on contract terms. We use proof of delivery for certain large equipment with more complex logistics, whereas the delivery of other equipment is estimated based on historical averages of in-transit periods (i.e., time between shipment and delivery). Generally, shipping costs are included in the price of equipment unless the customer requests a non-standard shipment. In situations where an alternative shipment arrangement has been made, the Company recognizes the shipping revenue upon customer receipt of the shipment.

In situations where arrangements include customer acceptance provisions based on seller or customer-specified objective criteria, we recognize revenue when we have concluded that the customer has control of the goods and that acceptance is likely to occur. We generally do not provide for anticipated losses on point in time transactions prior to transferring control of the equipment to the customer.

Our billing terms for these point in time equipment contracts vary and generally coincide with shipment to the customer; however, within certain businesses, we receive progress payments from customers for large equipment purchases, which is generally to reserve production slots with our manufacturing partners, which are recorded as contract liabilities.

Due to the customized nature of the equipment, the Company does not allow for customer returns.

Service Performance obligations satisfied over time.

We enter into long-term product service agreements with our customers primarily within our microgrid segment. These agreements require us to provide preventative maintenance, and standby support services that include certain levels of assurance regarding system performance throughout the contract periods, these contracts will generally range from 1 to 10 years. We account for items that are integral to the maintenance of the equipment as part of our service-related performance obligation, unless the customer has a substantive right to make a separate purchasing decision (e.g., equipment upgrade). Contract modifications that extend or revise contract terms are not uncommon and generally result in our recognizing the impact of the revised terms prospectively over the remaining life of the modified contract (i.e., effectively like a new contract). Revenues are recognized for these arrangements on a straight-line basis consistent with the nature, timing and extent of our services, which primarily relate to routine maintenance and as needed product repairs. Our billing terms for these contracts vary, but we generally invoice periodically as services are provided.

F-12
Table of Contents

Contract assets represent revenue recognized in excess of amounts billed on contractsand include unbilled receivables (typically for cost reimbursable contracts) of $0and contract work in progress. The Liability, “Billings in excessprogress (typically for fixed-price contracts) of costs”, represents billings in excess of revenues recognized on contracts in progress. At September 30, 2018 $0 and September 30, 2017, the costs in excess of billings balance were $52,439 and $0, and the billings in excess of costs balance were $0 and $0, respectively.

Accounts receivables are recorded on contracts for amounts currently due based upon progress billings, as well as retention, which are collectible upon completion of the contracts.  Accounts payable to material suppliers and subcontractors are recorded for amounts currently due based upon work completed or materials received, as are retention due subcontractors, which are payable upon completion of the contract.  General and administrative expenses are charged to operations as incurred and are not allocated to contract costs. Retention receivable is the amount withheld by a customer until a contract is completed. Retention receivables of $17,751 and $0 were included in the balance of trade accounts receivable $4,103 as of September 30, 20182021 and September 30, 2017,2020, respectively. Unbilled receivables, which represent an unconditional right to payment subject only to the passage of time, are reclassified to accounts receivable when they are billed under the terms of the contract. There are no advances that are payments on account of contract assets that have been deducted from contract assets as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020. Contract liabilities mostly represent customer deposits. The Company recorded $296,964 and $64,198 in contract liabilities as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively.

The total revenue recognized from sale of switchgear for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 is $4,448,726 and $7,505,761 respectively.

Revenues from software

The Company derives its software revenue from both subscription fees from customers for access to its energy software offerings and software license sales and support services. Revenues from software licenses are generally recognized upfront when the software is made available to the customer and revenues from the related support is generally recognized ratably over the contract term. The Company’s policy is to exclude sales and other indirect taxes when measuring the transaction price of its subscription agreements.

The Company’s subscription agreements generally have monthly or annual contractual terms. Revenue is recognized ratably over the related contractual term beginning on the date that the platform is made available to a customer. Access to the platform represents a series of distinct services as the Company continually provides access to, and fulfills its obligation to the end customer over the subscription term. The series of distinct services represents a single performance obligation that is satisfied over time.

The total revenue recognized from design, software development and other technology-based consulting services for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 is $1,676,505 and $2,431,419, respectively.

Revenues from design, software development and other technology-based consulting services

For service contracts performed under Master Services Agreements (“MSA”) and accompanying Statement(s) of Work (“SOW”), revenue is recognized based on the performance obligation(s) outlined in the SOW which is typically hours worked or specific deliverable milestones. In the case of a milestone-based SOW, the Company recognizes revenues as each deliverable is signed off by the customer.

The total revenue recognized from design, software development and other technology-based consulting services for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 is $1,676,505 and $2,431,419, respectively.

Revenues from data center services

The Company provides data services such as providing its customers with rack space, power and equipment, and cloud services such as virtual services, virtual storage, and data backup services, generally based on monthly services provided at a defined price included in the contracts. The performance obligations are the services provided to a customer for the month based on the contract. The transaction price is the price agreed with the customer for the monthly services provided and the revenues are recognized monthly based on the services rendered for the month.

The total revenue recognized from data center services for the years ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020 is $554,345 and $0, respectively.

Variable Consideration

The nature of the Company’s contracts gives rise to several types of variable consideration, including claims and unpriced change orders; awards and incentive fees; and liquidated damages and penalties. The Company recognizes revenue for

F-13
Table of Contents

variable consideration when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. The Company estimates the amount of revenue to be recognized on variable consideration using the expected value (i.e., the sum of a probability-weighted amount) or the most likely amount method, whichever is expected to better predict the amount. Factors considered in determining whether revenue associated with claims (including change orders in dispute and unapproved change orders in regard to both scope and price) should be recognized include the following: (a) the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the claim, (b) additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen at the contract date and not the result of deficiencies in the company’s performance, (c) claim-related costs are identifiable and considered reasonable in view of the work performed, and (d) evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. If the requirements for recognizing revenue for claims or unapproved change orders are met, revenue is recorded only when the costs associated with the claims or unapproved change orders have been incurred. Back charges to suppliers or subcontractors are recognized as a reduction of cost when it is determined that recovery of such cost is probable and the amounts can be reliably estimated. Disputed back charges are recognized when the same requirements described above for claims accounting have been satisfied.

The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its engineering and construction contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred.

Practical Expedients

If the Company has a right to consideration from a customer in an amount that corresponds directly with the value of the Company’s performance completed to date (a service contract in which the company bills a fixed amount for each hour of service provided), the Company recognizes revenue in the amount to which it has a right to invoice for services performed.

The Company does not adjust the contract price for the effects of a significant financing component if the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period between when the company transfers a service to a customer and when the customer pays for that service will be one year or less.

The Company has made an accounting policy election to exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are collected by the Company from its customers (use taxes, value added taxes, some excise taxes).

For the year ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company reported revenues of $49,438,115 and $10,028,701, respectively.

Cost of Revenues

The Company includes the following in cost of revenues: energy costs, materials costs, manufacturing and logistics costs, freight costs, inventory write-downs, hosting services costs. The recognition of cost of revenue for our energy segment is dependent upon the revenue stream that it pertains to, refer below:

1.Products Delivered at a Point in Time. Cost of revenue from these products is recognized when the Company transfers control of the product to the customer, which is generally upon shipment.
2.Products Delivered Over Time. Cost of revenue from these products is recognized over the related service period.

Cash and cash equivalents including restricted cash

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and amounts due from banks and restricted cash. The Company’s restricted cash represents amounts held in trust for certain construction projects. The following table sets forth a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported in the consolidated balance sheets that agrees to the total of those amounts as presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Cash and cash equivalents, excluding restricted cash $14,571,198  $3,126,202
Restricted cash – construction escrow account  3,469,129     
Cash and cash equivalents per consolidated Balance Sheet $18,040,327  $3,126,202

F-14

Accounts Receivablereceivable

Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms. They are initially recorded at the invoiced amount upon the sale of goods or services to customers, and do not bear interest. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluation of its customers and management closely monitors outstanding receivables based on factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends, and other information. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed periodically for collectability. If management determines that collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected is recorded.

Accounts receivable, net consists of the following:

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Accounts Receivable, gross $ 2,891,784   $902,146
Other receivables  421,681     
Retainage receivable       615
Provision for doubtful allowances  (693,508)  (42,970)
Total Accounts Receivable, net $ 2,619,957   $859,791

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower cost or net realizable value with cost being measured on a first-in, first-out basis. For solar panel and battery installations, the Company transfers component parts from inventories to cost of goods sold once installation is complete. The Company periodically reviews inventories for unusable and obsolete items based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Based on this evaluation, provisions are made to write inventories down to their net realizable value. There were no write-downs of inventory as of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The composition of inventory for the years ended as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 are as follows:

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Batteries and solar panels $1,819,398  $  
Supplies and other  853,346   247,500
Total inventory $2,672,744  $247,500

The Company has presented inventory amounting to $247,500separate from Prepaid and other current assets to Inventory as of September 30, 2020.

Prepaid expense and other current assets

The Company records a prepaid expense for costs paid but not yet incurred. Those expected to be incurred within one year are recognized and shown as a short-term pre-paid expense. Any costs expected to be incurred outside of one year would be considered other long term assets.

Other current assets are assets that consist of deposits and interest receivable. Deposits and interest we expect to receive within one year are shown as short-term. Those we expect to receive outside of one year are shown as other long term assets.

Investment securities

Investment securities include debt securities and equity securities. Debt securities are classified as available for sale (“AFS”) and are reported as an asset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their estimated fair value. As the fair values of AFS debt securities change, the changes are reported net of income tax as an allowanceelement of OCI, except for doubtful accountsother-than-temporarily-impaired securities. When AFS debt securities are sold, the unrealized gains or losses are reclassified from OCI to non-interest income. Securities classified as AFS are securities that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of $0time, but not necessarily to maturity. Any decision to sell a security classified as AFS would be based on various factors, including significant movements in interest rates, changes in the maturity mix of the Company’s assets and $0 at September 30, 2018,liabilities, liquidity needs, decline in credit quality, and September 30, 2017, respectively.regulatory capital considerations.

Interest income is recognized based on the coupon rate and increased by accretion of discounts earned or decreased by the amortization of premiums paid over the contractual life of the security.

 F-8F-15 
Table of Contents 

Cash and cash equivalentsFor purposes of the statements of cash flows,individual debt securities where the Company considerseither intends to sell the security or more likely than not will not recover all highly liquidof its amortized cost, OTTI (other than temporary impairment) is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security's cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. For individual debt securities for which a credit loss has been recognized in earnings, interest accruals and amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts are suspended when the credit loss is recognized. Interest received after accruals have been suspended is recognized in income on a cash basis.

The Company holds investments in both publicly held and short-term debt instruments with original maturitiesprivately held equity securities. However, as described in Note 1, the Company is primarily doing business of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There was $412,777in the digital currency mining sector and $57,128alternative energy sector, and not in cash and no cash equivalents asthe business of September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, respectively.investing in securities.

 

Privately held equity securities are recorded at cost and adjusted for observable transactions for same or similar investments of the issuer (referred to as the measurement alternative) or impairment. All gains and losses on privately held equity securities, realized or unrealized, are recorded through gains or losses on equity securities on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

Publicly held equity securities are based on fair value accounting with unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected as unrealized gains or losses on equity securities in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Concentration Risk

At times throughout the year, the Company may maintain cash balances in certain bank accounts in excess of FDIC limits. As of September 30, 2018, theThe cash balance, in excess of the FDIC limits was $149,429.$17,790,327 and $2,876,202 for periods ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively. The accounts offered by custodians of the Company’s bitcoin are not insured by the FDIC. The fair market value of bitcoin held in accounts covered by FDIC limits was $27,554,031 and $0 for the periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk in these accounts.

The Company hadhas certain customers whose revenueand vendors who individually represented 10% or more of the Company’s total revenue. (Seerevenue or capital expenditures. (see Note 1716 for details.)details) 

Leases

In accordance with ASC 842, the Company assesses whether an arrangement contains a lease at contract inception. When an arrangement contains a lease, the Company categorize leases with contractual terms longer than twelve months as either operating or finance. Finance leases are generally those leases that allow us to substantially utilize or pay for the entire asset over its estimated life. Assets acquired under finance leases are recorded in “Fixed Assets, net.” All other leases are categorized as operating leases.

The Company records right-of use ("ROU") assets and lease obligations for its finance and operating leases, which are initially recognized based on the discounted future lease payments over the term of the lease. As the rate implicit in the Company's leases is not easily determinable, the Company’s applicable incremental borrowing rate is used in calculating the present value of the sum of the lease payments.

Lease term is defined as the non-cancelable period of the lease plus any options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option. The Company has elected not to recognize ROU asset and lease obligations for its short-term leases, which are defined as leases with an initial term of 12 months or less.

Some leases include multiple year renewal options. The Company’s decision to exercise these renewal options is based on an assessment of its current business needs and market factors at the time of the renewal. Currently, the Company has no leases for which the option to renew is reasonably certain and therefore, options to renew were not factored into the calculation of its right of use asset and lease liability as of September 30, 2021.

For all classes of underlying assets, the Company has elected to not separate lease from non-lease components.

F-16
Table of Contents

Warranty Liability

The Company establishes warranty liability reserves to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of installation and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to the Company’s business. Liability estimates are determined based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’manufacturers and subcontractors’subcontractors participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and discussions with the Company’s general counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases. The Company’s manufacturers and service providers currently provide substantial warranties between ten to twenty-five years with full reimbursement to replace and install replacement parts. WarrantyWhile it is probable that the Company will incur costs associated with future warranty claims, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the loss of future warranty claims. Thus, the loss on warranty claims will be charged to the income of the period in which the loss can be reasonably estimated and shall not be charged retroactively to an earlier period, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450. There were 0warranty costs and associated liabilities for the years endedas of September 30, 20182021 and 2017 were $0 and $0, respectively.September 30, 2020.

Stock-basedStock -based compensation

The Company follows the guidelines in FASB Codification Topic ASC 718-10 Compensation-Stock Compensation, which requires companies to measure the cost of employee and non-employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Stock-based compensation expense for stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50 under which the awards are valued at the earlier of a commitment date or upon completion of the services, based on the fair value of the equity instruments, and are recognized as expense over the service period. On June 9, 2017, the Company implemented an employee stock-based compensation plan and since inception of the plan has issued 319,206 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock under this plan as of September 30, 2018. The options are exercisable between $0.80 to $3.45 per share. The Company may issue compensatory shares for services including, but not limited to, executive, management, accounting, operations, corporate communication, financial and administrative consulting services. The Company determines the grant date fair value of the options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. For discussion of accounting for RSUs, please refer Note 13 – Stock-Based Compensation.

Earnings (loss) per share

The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)FASB ASC 260-10 Earnings“Earnings Per Share,” which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding forduring the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity. The calculation of diluted net loss per share gives effect to common stock equivalents; however, potential common shares are excluded if their effect is anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2018,2021 and 2020, there are 9,461,102were 2,173,578 shares and 1,577,013 shares, respectively, issuable upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and convertible debt whichrestricted stock units, as well as 5,250,000 shares issuable upon preferred stock conversions, that were excluded from the current and prior period calculations of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would have been excluded as anti-dilutive.anti-dilutive to the Company’s net loss.

Long-lived Assets

Property and equipment

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounts Standard Codification (ASC) ASC 360-10, "Property, Plant and Equipment,"Equipment” the carrying value of intangible assetsproperty and equipment, and other long-lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value. During the yearsyear ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017September 30, 2020 the Company recordeddid not record an impairment expenseexpense. Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Construction in progress is the construction or development of $1,896,090 related toassets that has not yet been placed in service for its intended use. Depreciation for machinery and equipment, mining equipment, buildings, furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements commences once they are ready for its intended use. Land is not depreciated.

Depreciation is calculated on a patent and client lists acquired in 2016 whichstraight-line basis over the Company does not anticipate utilizing in future periods and $8,551,321 related to impairmentestimated useful life of software, microgrid and gasification assets, respectively.the asset as follows: 

Useful life (years)
Building30
Machinery and equipment1 - 10
Mining equipment3 15
Leasehold improvementsShorter of estimated lease term or 5 years
Furniture and fixtures1 - 5

F-17
Table of Contents

Business combinations, Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations,”Business Combinations, where the total purchase price is allocated to the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The purchase price is allocated using the information currently available, and may be adjusted, up to one year from acquisition date, after obtaining more information regarding, among other things, asset valuations, liabilities assumed and revisions to preliminary estimates. The difference between the purchase price, in excess ofincluding any contingent consideration, and the fair value of the tangible and identified intangiblenet assets acquired less liabilities assumed is recognizedrecorded as goodwill.

Contingent consideration transferred is initially recognized at fair value. Contingent consideration classified as a liability or an asset is remeasured to fair value each period until settlement, with changes recognized in profit or loss. Contingent consideration classified as equity is not remeasured. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and are expensed as incurred.

The Company reviews its indefinite lived intangibles and goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value and may not be recoverable. In accordance with its policies, the Company performed an assessment of indefinite lived intangibles and goodwill as of the year end September 30, 2021. (See Note 6 for impairment related to indefinite lived intangibles and determined theregoodwill).

2021 Goodwill Impairment analysis

In completing the 2021 annual goodwill impairment analysis, the Company elected to perform both qualitative and quantitative assessments for our goodwill. The assessments involve comparing the carrying value of the entity, including goodwill, to its estimated fair value. In accordance with ASU 2017-04, a goodwill impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. In determining the fair value for which the quantitative assessment was performed, the Company obtained an independent evaluation of goodwill. The independent evaluation agency has utilized the income approach to test for goodwill impairment. The income approach is a valuation technique under which we estimate future cash flows using the financial forecast from the perspective of an unrelated market participant. Using historical trending and internal forecasting techniques, revenue is projected and applied to fixed and variable cost experience rates to arrive at the future cash flows. A terminal value was then applied to the projected cash flow stream. Future estimated cash flows were discounted to their present value to calculate the estimated fair value. The discount rate used was the value-weighted average of our estimated cost of capital derived using both known and estimated customary market metrics. In determining the estimated fair value, several factors were estimated, including projected operating results, growth rates, economic conditions, anticipated future cash flows and the discount rate.

The assessment indicated that impairment of goodwill was necessary. Based on the assessment for impairment, the Company reported an impairment expense of goodwill of $5,723,388 for the year ended September 30, 2021. There was no impairment expense for the year ended September 30, 2020.

The following table reflects segment wise goodwill activity for the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017.2020, respectively: 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Segment Wise Goodwill Activity (Details)

               
  Digital Energy Others Total
Goodwill- October 1, 2019 $    $4,919,858  $    $4,919,858
New Acquisitions       6,395   977,388   983,783
Impairment                   
Goodwill- September 30, 2020       4,926,253   977,388   5,903,641
New Acquisitions  12,048,419   6,820,526        18,868,945
Impairment       (4,746,000)  (977,388)  

(5,723,388)

Goodwill- September 30, 2021 $12,048,419  $7,000,779  $    $19,049,198

 

 F-9F-18 
Table of Contents 

The Company amortizes intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives, which range between two and twenty years as follows:

Useful life (years)
Patents13-20
Websites3
Customer list and non-compete agreement2-4
Design assets2
Trademarks14
Engineering trade secrets1-7
Software4-7
Strategic contract5
Infrastructure asset15
Capitalized software7

Digital Currency

Digital currencies are included in current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Digital currencies are classified as indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other, and are accounted for in connection with the Company’s revenue recognition policy detailed above and in Footnote 2 – Significant Accounting Policies. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently, when events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived asset is impaired. Quantitative impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, which is measured using the quoted price of the digital currency at the time its fair value is being measured in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. Quoted prices are obtained from the principal market. To the extent an impairment loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new cost basis of the asset. Subsequent reversal of impairment losses is not permitted as per ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other.

Digital currencies earned by the Company through its mining activities are included within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The sales of digital currencies are included within investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and any realized gains or losses from such sales are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accounts for its gains or losses in accordance with the first in first out (“FIFO”) method of accounting.

The following table presents the activities of the digital currencies for the year ended September 30, 2021:

Amount ($)
Balance as on September 30, 2019
Additions to digital currencies
Sale of digital currencies
Balance as on September 30, 2020
Additions of digital currencies38,846,633
Sale of digital currencies(11,443,132)
Realized gain on sale of digital currencies3,104,378
Digital currencies issued for services(296,593)
Impairment loss(6,608,076)
Balance as on September 30, 202123,603,210

Software Development Costs

The Company capitalizes software development costs under guidance of ASC 985-20 “CostsCosts of Software to be Sold, Leased or Marketed”.Marketed for our mPulse, Canvas & Plaid platforms and under ASC 350-40 Internal Use Software. Software development costs include payments made to independent software developers under development agreements, as well as direct costs incurred for internally developed products. Software development costs are capitalized once the technological feasibility of a product is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable. Technological feasibility of a product requires both technical

F-19
Table of Contents

design documentation and infrastructure design documentation, or the completed and tested product design and a working model. Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in the assessment of when technological feasibility is established, and the evaluation is performed on a product-by-product basis. For products where proven technology exists, such as mPulse 2.0 and mVSO 2.0 this may occur early in the development cycle. Prior to a product's release, if and when we believe capitalized costs are not recoverable, we expense the amounts as part of "Product development." Capitalized costs for products that are cancelled or are expected to be abandoned are charged to "Product development" in the period of cancellation. Amounts related to software development which are not capitalized are charged immediately to "Product development."

Commencing upon a product's release, capitalized software development costs are amortized to "Cost of revenues—revenues software amortization "amortization" based on the ratio of current revenues to total projected revenues for the specific product, generally resulting in an amortization period of seven years for our current product offerings. In accordance with ASC 985-35 in recognition of the uncertainties involved in estimating future revenue, amortization will never be less than straight-line amortization of the products remaining estimated economic life.

We evaluate the future recoverability of capitalized software development costs on a quarterly basis. For products that have been released in prior periods, the primary evaluation criterion is the actual performance of the software platform to which the costs relate. For products that are scheduled to be released in future periods, recoverability is evaluated based on the expected performance of the specific products to which the costs relate. Criteria used to evaluate expected product performance include: historical performance of comparable products developed with comparable technology; market performance of comparable software; orders for the product prior to its release; pending contracts and general market conditions.

Significant management judgments and estimates are utilized in assessing the recoverability of capitalized costs. In evaluating the recoverability of capitalized costs, the assessment of expected product performance utilizes forecasted sales amounts and estimates of additional costs to be incurred. If revised forecasted or actual product sales are less than the originally forecasted amounts utilized in the initial recoverability analysis, the net realizable value may be lower than originally estimated in any given quarter, which could result in an impairment charge. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of expenses for any period if matters resolve in a manner that is inconsistent with management's expectations. If an impairment occurs the reduced amount of the capitalized software costs that have been written down to the net realizable value at the close of each annual fiscal period will be considered the cost for subsequent accounting purposes.

Income taxes – The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with FASB Codification Topic ASC 740-10, “Income Taxes”, which requires recognitionFair Value Measurement of deferred tax assetsfinancial instruments, derivative asset and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. contingent consideration

Reclassifications– Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. On the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 $4,020,269, net of $333,139 in accumulated depreciation has been reclassified from Flexpower system assets to intangible assets. This amount was associated with engineering and trade secrets. Flexpower assets have been reclassified as capitalized software to more clearly reflect the nature of the assets. In addition, $1,067,556 in amortization and depreciation expense related to the capitalized software has been reclassified to product development expense for the year ended September 30, 2017. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations or net assets of the Company.

F-10
Table of Contents

Segment Reporting – Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding the method to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company currently has one reportable segment for financial reporting purposes, which represents the Company's core business.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements -

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the new guidance requires enhanced disclosures about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including revenue recognition policies to identify performance obligations, assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain and fulfill a contract, and significant judgments in measurement and recognition.

In July 2015, the FASB made a decision to defer the effective date of the new standard for one year and permit early adoption as of the original effective date.  The new standard will be effective for the Company as of October 1, 2018. The Company has evaluated the impact of the adoption of this standard on its revenue recognition policy and does not believe it will have a material impact on its financial statements.

The Company has evaluated all other recent accounting pronouncements, and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS ON UNCOMPLETED CONTRACTS

The Asset, “Costs in excess of billings”, represents revenues recognized in excess of amounts billed on contracts in progress. The Liability, “Billings in excess of costs”, represents billings in excess of revenues recognized on contracts in progress. At September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the costs in excess of billings balance were $52,439 and $0, and the billings in excess of costs balance were $0 and $0, respectively.

The following is a summary of the costs and estimated earnings on contracts as of September 30, 2018. There were no open percentage-of-completion method contracts as of September 30, 2017.

  Year ended September 30, 2018
Costs incurred on contracts $292,990
Estimated earnings  114,471
   407,461
    
Less billings to date  (355,022)
Total  52,439
    
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings  52,439
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings  —  
Total $52,439

All contracts open as of September 30, 2018 are expected to be completed in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.

F-11
Table of Contents

4.    CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE

Capitalized software consists of the following as of September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017:

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
mVSO software $4,708,203  $4,663,513
MPulse software  6,334,772   5,923,197
Less: accumulated amortization  (2,256,749)  (877,266)
Capitalized Software, net $8,786,226  $9,709,444

In accordance with ASC 985-20 the Company capitalized $456,265 in software development costs (including capitalized stock compensation cost of $60,175) related to the enhancements created for our mPulse and mVSO 2.0 platforms during the year ended September 30, 2018.

Capitalized software amortization recorded as product development expense for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $1,379,483 and $1,067,556, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an impairment of $5,039,078 related directly to components of our original software that were replaced.

5.    INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017:

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Patents $71,962  $89,473
Websites  16,482   14,532
Brand and Client lists  —     2,497,472
Trademarks  5,928   5,928
Engineering trade secrets  4,020,269   4,020,269
Software  26,990   26,990
Less: accumulated amortization  (927,164)  (750,978)
Intangible assets, net $3,214,467  $5,903,686

Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $802,287 and $675,379, respectively.

During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 the Company recorded an impairment of $1,894,847 and $0, respectively.

6. FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017:

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Machinery and equipment $130,191  $133,061
Furniture and fixtures  54,251   74,393
 Total  184,442   207,454
Less: accumulated depreciation  (97,711)  (82,013)
Fixed assets, net $86,731  $125,441

Depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was $52,694 and $102,054, respectively.

In 2017, the Company also recorded additional depreciation expense of $1,601,936 related to microgrid assets, which were impaired in the year ended September 30, 2017.

During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 the Company recorded an impairment of fixed assets of $1,243 and $3,512,243, respectively.

F-12
Table of Contents

7. LOANS

Long term

 September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Long-term loans payable consist of the following:    
     
Promissory notes $150,000  $150,000
        
Total $150,000  $150,000

On November 11, 2017, the Company executed a 10% secured promissory note with a face value of $100,000 with an investor. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $100,000 and agreed to make monthly interest payments and repay the note principal 24 months from the date of issuance. The note is secured by 100,000 shares which would be issued to the note holder only in the case of an uncured default. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $100,000 in principal and $822 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $6,411 for the year ended September 30, 2018.

On December 5, 2017, the Company executed a 9% secured promissory note with a face value of $50,000 with an investor. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $50,000 and agreed to make monthly interest payments and repay the note principal 24 months from the date of issuance. The note is secured by 50,000 shares which would be issued to the note holder only in the case of an uncured default. As of September 30, 2018, The Company owed $50,000 in principal and $370 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $2,552 for the year ended September 30, 2018.

Current

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Current loans payable consist of the following:  
     
Promissory notes $628,951  $—  
Insurance financing loans  10,257   7,712
Unamortized debt discount  (181,629)  —  
        
Total, net of unamortized discount $457,579  $7,712

Promissory Notes

On September 5, 2017, the Company executed a 9% secured promissory note with a face value of $150,000 with an investor. Under the terms of the promissory note, the Company received $150,000 and agreed to make monthly interest payments and repay the note principal 24 months from the date of issuance. The note is secured by 150,000 shares which are held in escrow and would be issued to the note holder only in the case of an uncured default. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $150,000 in principal and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $13,500 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

On October 6, 2017, the Company executed an unsecured variable interest rate promissory note with a maximum interest rate of 58.3% and a face value of $45,000 with a financial institution. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $45,000 and agreed to repay the note evenly over 12 months. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $3,750 in principal and $450 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $14,175 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on October 1, 2018.

F-13
Table of Contents

On November 20, 2017, the Company executed a 10% unsecured promissory note with a face value of $80,000 with an investor. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $80,000 and agreed to make monthly interest payments and repay the note principal 12 months from the date of issuance. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $80,000 in principal and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $6,882 during the year ended September 30, 2018. On November 21, 2018, the investor extended the maturity date to December 31, 2018. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on December 31, 2018.

On January 12, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured variable interest rate promissory note with a maximum interest rate of 58.5% and a face value of $18,400 with a financial institution. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $18,400 and agreed to repay the note and interest evenly over 12 months. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $6,133 in principal and $184 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $5,520 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on October 1, 2018.

On February 27, 2018, we entered into an unsecured promissory note pursuant to which we borrowed $125,000. The note carries an original issue discount of 5.6% ($7,000). Interest under the promissory note was 10% per annum. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company agreed to make interest and principal payments equal to $2,500 or greater on a monthly basis. All unpaid balances under the note were due in full on August 1, 2018. The note was settled in full on August 1, 2018 through the issuance of a new promissory note. The Company recorded interest expense of $5,453 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The aggregate original issued issue discount has been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $7,000 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

On May 22, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured variable interest rate promissory note with a maximum interest rate of 51.0% and a face value of $24,500 with a financial institution. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $24,500 and agreed to repay the note and interest evenly over 12 months. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $18,375 in principal and $1,960 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $4,900 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on October 1, 2018.

On June 15, 2018, we entered into a 10% secured promissory note with a face value of $116,600 pursuant to which we received $110,000, net of an original issue discount of 6% ($6,600). The Company also issued 116,600 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 in connection with issuance of the promissory note. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company agreed to make monthly interest payments and repay the note principal on December 15, 2018. The note is secured by the Company’s accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $116,600 in principal and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $3,418 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company has determined the value associated with the warrants issued in connection with the note to be $110,000 which has been recorded as a debt discount. The aggregate original issue discount, and debt discount related to the warrants have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $68,176 for the year ended September 30, 2018. The unamortized discount as of September 30, 2018 amounted to $48,424. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on January 2, 2019.

F-14
Table of Contents

On August 1, 2018, we entered into a 10% secured promissory note with a face value of $130,625 pursuant to which we received $125,000, net of an original issue discount of 4.5% ($5,625). The Company also issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 in connection with purchase of the promissory note. The proceeds of the note were used to settle in full a note issued on February 27, 2018. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company agreed to make monthly interest only payments and repay the note principal on November 30, 2018. The note is secured by the Company’s accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $127,748 in principal and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $2,171 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company has determined the value associated with the warrants issued in connection with the note to be $71,373 which has been recorded as a debt discount. The aggregate original issue discount, and debt discount related to the warrants have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $38,499 the year ended September 30, 2018. The unamortized discount as of September 30, 2018 amounted to $38,499. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on January 2, 2019.

On August 14, 2018, the Company executed an unsecured variable interest rate promissory note with a maximum interest rate of 58.57% and a face value of $19,600 with a financial institution. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $19,600 and agreed to repay the note and interest evenly over 12 months. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $17,967 in principal and $784 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $1,568 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on October 1, 2018.

On September 20, 2018, the Company executed a 10% unsecured promissory note with a face value of $52,500 with an investor, net of an original issue discount of 5% ($2,500). Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $50,000 and agreed to repay the note principal and all accrued interest on December 31, 2018. The Company also issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 in connection with purchase of the promissory note. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $50,000 in principal and $144 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $144 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company has determined the value associated with the warrants issued in connection with the notes to be $50,000 which has been recorded as a debt discount. The aggregate original issue discount, and debt discount related to the warrants have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $5,147 the year ended September 30, 2018. The unamortized discount as of September 30, 2018 amounted to $47,353. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on December 31, 2018

On September 21, 2018, the Company executed a 10% unsecured promissory note with a face value of $52,500 with an investor, the note included an original issue discount of 5% ($2,500). Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $50,000 and agreed to repay the note principal and all accrued interest on December 31, 2018. The Company also issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 in connection with purchase of the promissory note. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $50,000 in principal and $144 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $144 during the year ended September 30, 2018. The Company has determined the value associated with the warrants issued in connection with the notes to be $50,000 which has been recorded as a debt discount. The aggregate original issue discount, and debt discount related to the warrants have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $5,147 the year ended September 30, 2018. The unamortized discount as of September 30, 2018 amounted to $47,353. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on December 31, 2018.

Insurance financing loans

In February 2018, the Company executed two unsecured 6.1% installment loans with a total face value of $35,089 with a financial institutional to finance its insurance policies. Under the terms of the installment notes the Company received $35,089 and agreed to make equal payments and repay the notes’ principal 10 months from their dates of issuance. As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $10,257 in principal and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement. The Company repaid all principal and outstanding interest on December 1, 2018.

F-15
Table of Contents

8. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

Convertible Notes Payable consists of the following: September 30, 2018
    

Labrys Fund, LP – March 23, 2018 Promissory Note Funding

On March 23, 2018, we entered into a master convertible promissory note pursuant to which we could borrow up to $500,000.

 

On March 23, 2018 the Company borrowed $200,000, less debt issuance costs of $15,750. The note carries an original issue discount of 10% ($20,000). Interest under the convertible promissory note is 12% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due on September 23, 2018. The Lender also received 237,500 commitment shares at execution as an inducement for entering into the agreement. The Company also incurred $15,750 of debt issuance costs on the note which was recorded as a debt discount.

 

The note was convertible at any date after the issuance date at the noteholder’s option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price, The Conversion price equals the lesser of (1) 70% multiplied by the lowest "Trading Price" during the previous 20 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (2) 70% multiplied by the lowest "Trading Price" for the Common Stock during the 20 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. The "Trading Price" as defined by the agreement is the lesser of: (a) the lowest trade price on the OTC Pink, OTCQB, or applicable trading market (the “OTC Market”) as reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting Service”) designated by the Holder and (b) the lowest closing bid price on the OTC Market as reported by a Reporting Service designated by the Holder.

 

The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $85,348 in connection with the commitment shares and $98,902 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of the note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the note.

 

On September 19, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $220,000 and $12,730, respectively was converted into 258,589 shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The aggregate debt discount have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $220,000 during the year ended September 30, 2018, respectively.

  —  
    
Total, net of unamortized discount $—  

Auctus Fund, LLC – July 2, 2018 Promissory Note Funding

 

On July 2, 2018 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Auctus Fund, LLC (“Auctus”), which was later amended on July 6, 2018, pursuant to which the Company issued to Auctus a Master Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) pursuant to which the Company could borrow up to $500,000. The Company also incurred $11,900 of debt issuance costs on the note which was recorded as a debt discount.

 

On July 11, Auctus paid $225,000 less $26,000 in legal and due diligence fees. The Note has a maturity date of six months for each tranche funded and the Company has agreed to pay interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Note at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the date on which the Note is issued (the “Issue Date”) until the same becomes due and payable, whether at maturity or upon acceleration or by prepayment or otherwise. The Company has the right to prepay the Note, provided it makes a payment to Auctus as set forth in the Note within 180 days of its Issue Date.

 

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to Auctus, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 150,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”), as further provided in the Note. The Returnable Shares shall be returned to the Company’s treasury if the Note is fully repaid and satisfied prior to the date, which is one hundred eighty (180) days following the Issue Date, subject further to the terms and conditions of the Note.

 

The Note is convertible at any date after the issuance date at the noteholder’s option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price of 70% of the lowest closing market price of our common stock during the previous 20 days to the date of the notice of conversion, subject to adjustment in the case of default.

 

The Note contains certain covenants, such as restrictions on: (i) distributions on capital stock, (ii) stock repurchases, (iii) certain loans, (iii) sales and the transfer of assets, and (iv) participation in 3(a)(10) transactions. The Note also contains certain anti-dilution provisions that apply in connection with any stock split, stock dividend, stock combination, recapitalization or similar transactions. In addition, subject to limited exceptions, Auctus will not have the right to convert any portion of the Note if Auctus, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to its conversion.

 

The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $130,829 in connection with the Non-returnable shares and $56,271 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of the Note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the Note.

 

On September 21, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $225,000 and $5,474, respectively was converted into 256,082 shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The aggregate debt discount have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $225,000 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

  —  
    
Total, net of unamortized discount $—  

EMA Financial, LLC – August 21, 2018 Promissory Note Funding

 

On August 21, 2018 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with EMA Financial, LLC, (“EMA”), pursuant to which we issued and sold to EMA a convertible promissory note, dated August 21, 2018 in the principal amount of $225,000 (the “Note”). The Note is due six months from the date of issuance and bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The Company received $199,000 from the investment less fees and debt issuance costs of $26,000 which was recorded as a debt discount.

 

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to EMA, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 100,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”), as further provided in the Note. The Returnable Shares shall be returned to the Company’s treasury if the Note is fully repaid and satisfied prior to the date, which is one hundred eighty (180) days following August 21, 2018, subject further to the terms and conditions of the Note.

 

The Note as amended on September 27, 2018, is convertible at any date after the issuance date at the noteholder’s option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price, equal to the lesser of (i) 70% of the lowest trading price during the previous 20 days and ending on the latest trading date prior to the date of the Note, or (ii) a 70% of the lowest trading price for our common stock during the 20 trading day period immediately prior to conversion but subject to a conversion floor price of $3.05. The floor price is subject to reset under certain conditions.

 

We have the right to prepay the Note at any time prior to 180 days following the closing date. If we pay after September 24, 2018, we must pay an additional $25,000 as a prepayment penalty.

 

The Note contains customary default events which, if triggered and not timely cured, will result in default interest and penalties. The Note also contains a right of first refusal provision with respect to future financings by us.

 

The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $113,727 in connection with the Non-returnable shares and $73,373 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of the Note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the Note.

 

The aggregate debt discount have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $48,955 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

 

As of September 30, 2018, the Company owed $225,000 in principal and $2,959 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement and recorded interest expense of $2,959 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

  225,000
Unamortized debt discount  (176,045)
    
Total, net of unamortized discount $48,955

Labrys Fund, LP – September 19, 2018 Promissory Note Funding

On March 23, 2018, we entered into a master convertible promissory note pursuant to which we could borrow up to $500,000.

 

On September 19, 2018 borrowed $330,000, less debt issuance costs of $20,700. The note also carries an original issue discount of 10% ($30,000). Interest under the convertible promissory note is 12% per annum, and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest is due six months from the date of issuance.

 

The Note, as amended on September 27, 2018, is convertible at any date after the issuance date at the noteholder’s option into shares of our common stock at a variable conversion price subject to a conversion floor price of $3.05, The Conversion price equals the lesser of (1) 70% multiplied by the lowest "Trading Price" during the previous 20 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the date of this Note and (2) 70% multiplied by the lowest "Trading Price" for the Common Stock during the 20 Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. The "Trading Price" as defined by the agreement is the lesser of: (a) the lowest trade price on the OTC Pink, OTCQB, or applicable trading market (the “OTC Market”) as reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting Service”) designated by the Holder and (b) the lowest closing bid price on the OTC Market as reported by a Reporting Service designated by the Holder. If the note is not repaid within 180 days of issuance the floor will cease to apply.

 

The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $279,300 in connection with the initial valuation of the derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of the note to be amortized utilizing the effective interest method of accretion over the term of the note.

 

The aggregate debt discount have been accreted and charged to interest expenses as a financing expense in the amount of $20,166 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

  330,000
Unamortized debt discount  (309,834)
Total, net of unamortized discount $20,166
    
Total convertible notes, net $69,121

The Company did not enter into any convertible note agreements in the year ended September 30, 2017.

F-16
Table of Contents

9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

The carrying value of cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and debt (See Notes 8 & 9) approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Management believes the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. The carrying amount of the Company’s long-term debt is also stated at fair value of $150,000 since the stated rate of interest approximates market rates. 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable.

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets.

Level 2

Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments.

Level 3Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own beliefs about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances.

F-20
Table of Contents

The following table presents the derivativeCompany’s financial instruments the Company’s only financial liabilitiesthat are measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheets on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2018:2021 and September 30, 2020:

September 30, 2021:

Amount ($)Level 1Level 2Level 3
Derivative asset4,905,656    4,905,656
Investment in equity security10,77210,772    
Investment in debt security494,608    494,608
Contingent cash consideration820,802    820,802
Total6,231,83810,772  6,221,066

September 30, 2020:

Amount ($)Level 1Level 2Level 3
Derivative asset2,115,269    2,115,269
Investment in equity security210,000210,000    
Investment in debt security500,000    500,000
Contingent cash consideration750,000    750,000
Total3,575,269210,000  3,365,269

Income taxes

The Company’s calculation of its tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and regulations in various taxing jurisdictions. The Company recognizes tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on management’s estimate of whether it is more likely than not that additional taxes will be required. The Company had no uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2021 and 2020.

Deferred income taxes are recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates. Temporary differences arise from net operating losses, differences in depreciation methods of archived images, and property and equipment, stock-based and other compensation, and other accrued expenses. A valuation allowance is established when it is determined that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The application of tax laws and regulations is subject to legal and factual interpretation, judgment and uncertainty. Tax laws and regulations themselves are subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, the evolution of regulations and court rulings. Therefore, the actual liability for U.S., or the various state jurisdictions, may be materially different from managements estimates, which could result in the need to record additional tax liabilities or potentially reverse previously recorded tax liabilities. Interest and penalties are included in tax expense.

The Company includes interest and penalties arising from the underpayment of income taxes in the statements of operation in the provision for income taxes. As of September 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations or net assets of the Company and are as follows:

 

The Company has reclassified interest receivable on investment in debt securities from Accounts Receivable to Prepaid expense and other current assets amounting to $399,863 and $187,562 as of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The revenue presentation is updated to remain consistent with the business segments of the Company. In 2020, revenues were categorized into hardware and software related sales. In 2021, the Company has realigned its focus and accordingly revenue is reported based upon business segments of digital currency mining, energy and others.
Product development expense for the year ended September 30, 2020 has been reclassified to be included in depreciation and amortization expense.

 AmountF-21 Level 1Level 2Level 3
Embedded conversion derivative liability$—  $—  $— $—  
Warrant and option derivative liabilities$—  $—  $—  $—  
Total$—  $—  $— $Table of Contents 

The embedded conversion feature in the convertible debt instruments that the Company issued (See Note 9), was convertible at issuance which qualified them as a derivative instrument since the number of shares issuable under the note is indeterminate based on guidance in ASC Topic No. 815-15, “Derivatives

Commitments and Hedging (“Topic No. 815-15”). Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt. This convertible debt tainted all other equity linked instruments including all outstanding non-employee options and warrants on the date that the instrument became convertible. contingencies

The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies and loss recoveries, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out of its business. The Company considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset, or the incurrence of a liability, as well as the Company’s ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information available with its external and internal counsel to determine whether an accrual is required, an accrual should be adjusted or a range of possible loss should be disclosed.

Segment Reporting

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in deciding the method to carryallocate resources and assess performance. To better align with the embedded derivativeCompany’s strategic objectives, the Company optimized its reportable segments down to two, (1) Digital Currency Mining Segment and (2) Energy Segment; by eliminating the digital agency segment. Results associated with that component are now being reported under other revenue and eliminations.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In October 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers, which requires contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination to be recognized and measured by the acquirer on its balance sheetthe acquisition date in accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as if it had originated the contracts. Under the current business combinations guidance, such assets and liabilities are recognized by the acquirer at fair value on the acquisition date. This new guidance is effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2023 and account for any unrealized change in fair value asinterim periods within that fiscal year, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating its potential impact but does not expect the new standard to have a component ofmaterial impact on the Company's results of operations.operations or cash flows.

On September 27, 2018, all derivative instruments held by

In March 2020, the Company had been either extinguished through settlementFASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the associated debts or throughEffects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting and issued subsequent amendments to the instrumentsinitial guidance (collectively, “Topic 848”). Topic 848 became effective immediately and expires on December 21, 2022. Topic 848 allows eligible contracts that removedare modified to be accounted for as a continuation of those contracts, permits companies to preserve their hedging accounting during the derivative aspecttransition period and enables companies to make a one-time election to transfer or sell held-to-maturity debt securities that are affected by rate reform. Topic 848 provides optional expedients and exceptions for contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The adoption of ASU 2020-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the instrument.Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

 

The Black-ScholesCompany adopted ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments on October 1, 2020 (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a new forward-looking “expected loss” model utilizedthat reflects expected credit losses, including credit losses related to trade receivables, and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates, which generally will result in the following inputs to valueearlier recognition of allowances for losses. As the derivative liabilitiesCompany was a Smaller Reporting Company at the datetime of issuance of the ASU, the Company expects to adopt the ASU effective October 1, 2023, including the interim periods within the fiscal year. In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (subtopic 815-40),” which reduces the number of accounting models in ASC 470-20 that require separate accounting for embedded conversion features. As a result, a convertible note through September 27, 2018 which wasdebt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost as long as no other features require bifurcation and recognition as derivatives. By removing those separation models, the dateeffective interest rate of convertible debt instruments will be closer to the derivative liability was terminated:

Fair value assumptions:March 23, 2018 through September 27, 2018
Risk free interest rate1.92-2.81%
Expected term (years)0.26-6.99
Expected volatility134%-334%
Expected dividends0%

coupon interest rate. Further, the diluted net income per share calculation for convertible instruments will require the Company to use the if-converted method. The following table presentstreasury stock method should no longer be used to calculate diluted net income per share for convertible instruments. The amendment will be effective for the Company with annual periods beginning January 1, 2022 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2020-06 is not expected to have a summary ofmaterial impact on the Company’s derivative liabilities associated with its convertible notes as of September 30, 2018:financial statements or disclosures.

Amount
Balance September 30, 2017$—  
Debt discount originated from derivative liabilities789,219
Initial derivative loss recorded4,160,476
Fair value of derivative liability at issuance reclassified from additional paid in capital12,537,117
Resolution of derivative liability reclassified to additional paid in capital(52,291,024)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities34,804,212
Balance September 30, 2018$—  

 F-17F-22
Table of Contents

In August 2020, the FASB issued Account Standard Update (“ASU”) 2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (subtopic 815-40),” which reduces the number of accounting models in ASC 470-20 that require separate accounting for embedded conversion features. As a result, a convertible debt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost as long as no other features require bifurcation and recognition as derivatives. By removing those separation models, the effective interest rate of convertible debt instruments will be closer to the coupon interest rate. Further, the diluted net income per share calculation for convertible instruments will require the Company to use the if-converted method. The treasury stock method should no longer be used to calculate diluted net income per share for convertible instruments. The amendment will be effective for the Company with annual periods beginning January 1, 2022 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2020-06 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements or disclosures.

3.    ACQUISITIONS

SOLAR WATT SOLUTIONS, INC.

On February 23, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “SWS Merger Agreement”) with Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. (“SWS”) and its owners (the “Sellers”). The Company accounted for the acquisition of SWS as an acquisition of a business under ASC 805 – Business Combination.

At the closing on February 24, 2021, SWS became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In exchange, the Company issued (i) 477,703 shares of restricted common stock with a deemed value of $15,640,000 calculated based on the five-day average price to the Sellers, of which (a) 167,685 shares with a deemed value of $5,490,000 would be fully earned on closing, and (b) an additional 310,018 shares with a deemed fair value of $10,150,000 were issued to an escrow agent and only earned by Sellers, subject to holdback pending Sellers’ satisfaction of certain future milestones with all such shares subject to a lock up of no less than 180 days and a leak out of no more than 10% of average daily trading value of the prior 30 days for a period of 36 months following the closing, and (ii) up to $3,850,000 in cash to the Sellers, minus the Sellers’ debt, minus the difference between the Actual Amount and Expected Amount consisting of: (A) $1,350,000 (no changes post acquisition date) in cash payable on a pro rata basis to Sellers at closing, less payment of $500,000 (no changes post acquisition date) to settle Sellers’ debt at closing, which includes (I) $200,000 (no changes post acquisition date) in cash was held back by the Company to satisfy potential damages from indemnification claims and any amounts owed pursuant to post-closing adjustments, (II) an additional $100,000 (no changes post acquisition date) in cash was held back by the Company to satisfy any amounts owed pursuant to post-closing adjustments, and (B) up to $2,500,000 (fair valued at $155,000 at acquisition date) in cash held back by the Company and only payable pro rata to Sellers upon meeting certain future milestones and subject to satisfaction of any amounts owing rom SWS to the Company resulting from damages required to be indemnified under the SWS Merger Agreement.

The Company determined the fair value of the consideration given to the sellers of SWS in connection with the transaction in accordance with ASC 820 was as follows:

Consideration: Fair Value
Cash $1,350,000
Contingent consideration  155,000
310,018 shares of common stock as contingent equity consideration $533,002
167,685 shares of common stock  4,649,905
Total Consideration $6,687,907


Purchase Price Allocation Preliminary Allocation at Acquisition Date Adjustments to Fair Value Final Allocation at Acquisition Date
Customer List  $5,122,733  $ (4,932,733) $ 190,000
Goodwill  1,642,409   5,178,126  6,820,535
Other Assets and Liabilities assumed, net  (77,235)  (245,393)  (322,628)
Total $6,687,907  $  $6,687,907

F-23
Table of Contents

The goodwill recorded as result of the acquisition represents the strategic benefits of growing the Company’s service portfolio and the expected revenue growth from increased market penetration. Acquired goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes. The total purchase price was allocated to identifiable assets deemed acquired, and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values.

In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, the Company determined that the accounting treatment of the contingent consideration as reported in the March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021 consolidated financial statements needed to be revised.  Specifically, the contingent cash consideration liability recorded at acquisition date of $2,500,000should be adjusted to $155,000 due to probability of non-satisfaction of future milestones. As a result, the contingent cash consideration liability recorded at acquisition date of $2,500,000 was adjusted to $155,000 due to probability of non-satisfaction of future milestones. The Company also estimated that based upon the milestones, only 19,221 contingent shares will be earned out of the 310,018 total contingent shares, and as a result, the Company adjusted the contingent stock consideration to $533,002. The Company assessed the materiality of these adjustments and determined that these were not material to previously issued financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021.

The immaterial impacts of these adjustments for the quarters ended March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021 are as follows:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (unaudited)

       
 March 31, 2021June 30, 2021
As Reported ($)Change ($)As Revised ($)As Reported ($)Change ($)As Revised ($)
       
Goodwill             32,034,559           (10,408,798)             21,625,761             31,797,564           (10,408,798)             21,388,766
Total assets           292,612,596           (10,408,798)           282,203,798           297,488,821           (10,408,798)           287,080,023
Contingent consideration - Current               2,416,667             (1,319,751)               1,096,916                  650,000                       (855)                  649,145
  Total current liabilities               7,340,445             (1,319,751)               6,020,694             11,910,017                       (855)             11,909,162
Contingent consideration - Non Current                  833,333                (833,333)                            -                  2,600,000             (2,000,000)                  600,000
  Total Liabilities               8,892,137             (2,153,084)               6,739,053             15,693,207             (2,000,855)             13,692,352
Additional paid-in capital           400,032,436             (8,063,798)           391,968,638           414,783,896             (8,063,798)           406,720,098
Total Stockholders' equity           283,720,459             (8,255,714)           275,464,745           281,795,614             (8,407,943)           273,387,671
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' equity           292,612,596           (10,408,798)           282,203,798           297,488,821           (10,408,798)           287,080,023

Condensed Consolidated Statement of operations (unaudited)

       
 For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
As Reported ($)Change ($)As Revised ($)As Reported ($)Change ($)As Revised ($)
       
Change in fair value of contingent consideration                                               (191,916)                (191,916)                                               (152,229)                (152,229)
   Total other income (expense)               9,897,012                (191,916)               9,705,096             (2,058,948)                (152,229)             (2,211,177)
Net Income/(loss)               7,400,040                (191,916)               7,208,124           (16,677,127)                (152,229)           (16,829,356)
Net Income (loss) attributable to the Company’s common shareholders               7,222,535                (191,916)               7,030,619           (16,677,127)                (152,229)           (16,829,356)

The amortization period for customer list is estimated to be 1.5 years. The Company estimated the fair value of the identified customer list using a discounted cash flow model. These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement. Key assumptions include the level and timing of expected incremental future cash flows over its remaining useful life, and discount rates the Company believe to be consistent with the inherent risks associated with customer list, which is 14%. The Company believes the level and timing of expected future cash flows appropriately reflects market participant assumptions.

The contingent cash consideration was re-measured to $320,802 at September 30, 2021. The company estimates the total contingent cash consideration to be between $320,000 and $550,000 based on the range of possible outcomes. In addition, the Company estimates the total stock consideration to be between $1,100,000 and $1,900,000 based on the range of possible outcomes.

Net sales and net loss of this business included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations in fiscal year 2021 were approximately $3,806,007 and $811,727, respectively.

ATL DATA CENTERS, LLC

On December 9, 2020, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “ATL Merger”) with ATL Data Centers LLC (“ATL”) and its members. The Company accounted for the acquisition of ATL as an acquisition

of a business under ASC 805 – Business Combination.

At the closing, ATL became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In exchange, the Company issued 1,618,285 shares of restricted common stock to the selling members of ATL, of which: (i) 642,309 shares were fully earned on closing, and (ii) an additional 975,976 shares were issued and held in escrow, subject to holdback pending satisfaction of certain indemnification claims and future milestones, with all such shares subject to a lock up of no less than 180 days and a leak out of no more than 10% of the average daily trading value of the prior 30 days.

The Company determined the fair value of the consideration given to the sellers of SWS in connection with the transaction in accordance with ASC 820 was as follows:

 Consideration Preliminary Allocation at Acquisition Date Adjustments to Fair Value Final Allocation at Acquisition Date
642,309 shares of common stock $8,407,826    $8,407,826
975,976 shares of common stock – held in escrow  12,775,525     12,775,525
Total Consideration $21,183,351     $21,183,351

Of the 975,976 shares held in escrow, 515,724 shares were released to the selling members of ATL and 68,194 shares were returned to the Company and canceled due to nonsatisfaction of certain indemnification claims during the year ended September 30, 2021. The remaining 392,058 shares held in escrow consist of 72,989 shares subject to holdback pending satisfaction of further indemnification claims and 319,069 shares subject to satisfaction of future milestones.

In connection with the return of the 68,194 shares held in escrow that were cancelled due to the non-satisfaction of certain indemnification claims, total consideration and the related goodwill, decreased by $892,659 during the year ended September 30, 2021.

F-24
Table of Contents

The consideration remitted in connection with the ATL Merger is subject to adjustment based on post-closing adjustments to closing cash, indebtedness, and transaction expenses of ATL within 90 days of closing. The Company also assumed approximately $6.9 million in debts of ATL at closing. As part of the transaction costs, the Company issued 41,708 shares of common stock for an aggregate value of $545,916 to the broker which were expensed upon issuance of the shares.

Purchase Price Allocation Preliminary Allocation at Acquisition Date Adjustments to Fair Value Final Allocation at Acquisition Date
Strategic Contract  $7,457,970  $ 2,342,000  $ 9,799,970
Goodwill  14,205,245   (1,264,167)  12,941,078
Other Assets and Liabilities assumed, net  (479,864)  (1,077,833)  (1,557,697)
Total $21,183,351  $    $21,183,351

The Company made measurement period adjustments, primarily to strategic contract and goodwill, to better reflect the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date.

The goodwill recorded as a result of the acquisition represents the strategic benefits of growing the Company’s service portfolio and the expected revenue growth from increased mcarket penetration. Acquired goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes. The total purchase price was allocated to identifiable assets deemed acquired, and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values.

The strategic contract relates to supply of a critical input to our digital currency mining business. The other assets and liabilities assumed include $5.67 million of digital currency mining equipment and $5.475 million of notes payable related to this equipment, which was settled by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2021. In connection with the acquisition, the Company had acquired an operating lease related to a rental building, which had a purchase option associated with the lease agreement. The Company exercised the purchase option to buy the property in May 2021 and, as a result, terminated the lease.

The amortization period for strategic contracts is estimated to be 5 years. The Company estimated the fair value of the identified strategic contract using a discounted cash flow model. These fair value measurements were based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement. Key assumptions include the level and timing of expected future cash flows, conditions and demands over its remaining useful life, and discount rates the Company believe to be consistent with the inherent risks associated with strategic contract, which is 6.4%. The Company believe the level and timing of expected future cash flows appropriately reflects market participant assumptions.

Net sales and net income of this business included in CleanSpark’s consolidated results of operations in fiscal year 2021 were approximately $30,234,683 and $14,449,160, respectively.

P2K LABS, INC.

On January 31, 2020, the Company, entered into an Agreement with p2k, and its sole stockholder, Amer Tadayon (the “Seller”), whereby the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of p2k in exchange for an aggregate adjusted purchase price of cash and equity of $1,688,935. The transaction closed simultaneously upon the execution of the Agreement by the parties on January 31, 2020.

As a result of the transaction, p2k became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the purchase price was as follows:

a) $1,039,500 in cash was paid to the Seller;

b) 31,183 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $145,000, were issued to the Seller (the “Shares”). The Shares are subject to certain lock-up and leakout provisions whereby the Seller may sell an amount of Shares equal to ten percent (10%) of the daily dollar trading volume of the Company’s common stock on its principal market for the prior 30 days (the “Leak-Out Terms”);

F-25
Table of Contents

c) $115,500 in cash was paid to an independent third-party escrow where such cash is subject to offset for adjustments to the purchase price and indemnification purposes;

d) 64,516 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $300,000, were issued to an independent third-party escrow agent (the “Holdback Shares”) and will be released to the Seller upon achievement of certain revenue milestones. During the year ended September 30, 2021, 56,444 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock were released to the Seller and the balance of 8,072 shares of the Company’s common stock were returned and cancelled. The Holdback Shares are subject to the Leak-Out Terms.

The Shares and Holdback Shares were deemed to have a fair market value of $4.65 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on January 31, 2020; and

e) 26,950 common stock options that were deemed to have a fair market value of $88,935 on the date of the closing of the transaction.

The Company accounted for the acquisition of p2k as an acquisition of a business under ASC 805 – Business Combinations.

The Company determined the fair value of the consideration given to the Seller in connection with the transaction in accordance with ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurement was as follows:

Cash Consideration ($):
Cash1,155,000
95,699 shares of common stock445,000
26,950 common stock options88,935
Total Consideration1,688,935

The total purchase price of the Company’s acquisition of p2k was allocated to identifiable assets deemed acquired, and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values as indicated below.

Purchase Price Allocation ($):
Customer list710,000
Design and other assets123,000
Goodwill977,388
Other assets and liabilities assumed, net(121,453)
Total1,688,935

Net sales and net loss of this business included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations in fiscal year 2021 were approximately $1,241,641 and $1,201,753, respectively.

GRIDFABRIC, LLC

On August 31, 2020, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with GridFabric, and its sole member, Dupont Hale Holdings, LLC (the “Seller”), whereby the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding membership units of GridFabric from the Seller (the “Transaction”) in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of cash and stock of up to $1,400,000 (the “Purchase Price”). The Transaction closed simultaneously with execution on August 31, 2020. As a result of the Transaction, GridFabric, became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Purchase Price was as follows:

1.$360,000 in cash was paid to the Seller at closing;
2.$400,000 in cash was delivered to an independent third-party escrow agent where such cash is subject to offset for adjustments to the Purchase Price and indemnification purposes for a period of 12 months;

F-26 
Table of Contents 

3.26,427 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $250,000, were issued to the Seller. The shares issued are subject to certain leak-out provisions whereby the Seller may sell an amount of shares equal to no more than ten percent (10%) of the daily dollar trading volume of the Company’s common stock on its principal market for the prior 30 days (the “Leak-Out Terms”); and
4.additional shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at up to $750,000, will be issuable to Seller if GridFabric achieves certain revenue and product release milestones related to the future performance of GridFabric (the “Earn-out Shares”). The Earn-Out Shares are also subject to the Leak-Out Terms.

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSThe Shares were issued at a fair market value of $9.46 per share. The Earn-Out Shares are accounted for as contingent consideration and the number of shares to be issued will be determined based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date such milestone event occurs.

Matthew Schultz- Chief Executive OfficerThe Agreement contains standard representations, warranties, covenants, indemnification and Directorother terms customary in similar transactions.

In connection with the transaction, the Company also entered into employment relationships and non-compete agreements with GridFabric’s key employees for a period of 36 months and plans to issue future equity compensation to said employees, subject to approval of the Company’s board of directors.

The Company hasaccounted for the acquisition of GridFabric as an acquisition of a consulting agreementbusiness under ASC 805 – Business Combinations.

The Company determined the fair value of the consideration given to the Seller in connection with Matthew Schultz, our Chief Executive Officer, for management services. Inthe Transaction in accordance with this agreement,ASC 820 – Fair Value Measurement was as amended, Mr. Schultz provides services to us in exchange for $15,000 in compensation for services plus a $1,000 medical insurance stipend, each month plus a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Mr. Schultz for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. follows:

Consideration:Fair Value ($)
Cash400,000
26,427 shares of common stock250,000
Contingent consideration - common stock issuable upon achievement of milestone(s)750,000
Total Consideration1,400,000

During the year ended September 30, 20182021, the Company reassessed the contingent consideration due to GridFabric to $500,000.

A change in the fair value of the contingent consideration of $250,000 is included in change in fair value of contingent consideration in Consolidated Statement of Consolidated Operations and 2017, Mr. Schultz earned $194,527Comprehensive Loss.

The total purchase price of the Company’s acquisition of GridFabric was allocated to identifiable assets deemed acquired, and $193,425,liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values as indicated below.

Purchase Price Allocation:  
Software $1,120,000
Customer list  60,000
Non-compete  190,000
Goodwill  26,395
Net Assets  3,605
Total $1,400,000

Net sales and operating loss of this business included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations in fiscal year 2021 were approximately $299,606 and $794,805, respectively.

F-27
Table of Contents

The following is the unaudited pro forma information assuming the acquisition of GridFabric, p2k Labs, ATL, and SWS occurred on October 1, 2019:

        
  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Net sales $35,581,937  $25,627,704
        
Net income (loss)  12,848,264   (47,333,110)
        
Net profit / (loss) per common share – basic and diluted $0.43  $(4.04)
        

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

 $29,939,290  $11,701,937

The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial results have been prepared for illustrative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually resulted had the acquisition occurred on the first day of the earliest period presented, or of future results of the consolidated entities. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information does not reflect any operating efficiencies and cost savings that may be realized from the integration of the acquisition. All transactions that would be considered inter-company transactions for proforma purposes have been eliminated.

4.    INVESTMENTS

As of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, the Company had total investments of $5,661,036 and $3,075,269 that comprise of the following:

International Land Alliance, Inc.

On November 5, 2019, the Company entered in a binding Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with International Land Alliance, Inc. (“ILAL”), a Wyoming corporation, to lay a foundational framework where the Company will deploy its energy solutions products and services to ILAL, its energy projects, and its customers.

In connection with the MOU, and to support the power and energy needs of ILALs development and construction of certain projects, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), dated as of November 6, 2019, with ILAL.

Investment in Debt Securities (Preferred Stock) and related Embedded Derivative Asset

Pursuant to the terms of the SPA with ILAL, the Company purchased 1,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of ILAL (the “Preferred Stock”) an aggregate purchase price of $500,000 (the “Stock Transaction”), less certain expenses and fees. The Series B Preferred Stock accrue cumulative in-kind accruals at a rate of 12% per annum and were redeemable on August 6, 2020. The Preferred Stock can be converted into common stock at a variable rate (refer the discussion on embedded derivative assets below). This variable conversion ratio will increase by 10% with the occurrence of certain events. Since the investments were not redeemed on August 6, 2020, they are now redeemable at the Company`s option in cash or into common stock, based on the conversion ratio. The Preferred Stock is recorded as an AFS debt security and is reported at its estimated fair value as of September 30, 2021. Any change in the fair values of AFS debt securities are reported net of income tax as an element of Other Comprehensive income.

The Company accrued interest on our available-for-sale debt securities totaling $399,863 and $187,562, as of September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively,presented as prepaid expense and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of investment in Debt Securities is $494,608 and $500,000 as of September 30, 2021 and 2020. The Company has presented loss on fair value of preferred stock amounting to $5,392 for the year ended September 30, 2021 as part of other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. There was an immaterial loss or gain on the fair value of preferred stock for the year ended September 30, 2020.

The Company has deemed this variable conversion feature of ILAL preferred stock as an embedded derivative instrument in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815. This topic requires the Company to account for the conversion feature on its balance sheet at fair value and account for changes in fair value as a derivative gain or loss. Unrealized gain or loss on fair valuation of this embedded feature is recognized as an income in Consolidated statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

F-28
Table of Contents

Total fair value of investment in Derivative assets as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 is $4,905,656 and $2,115,269. The Company fair values the debt security as a straight debt instrument based on liquidation value and accrued interest to date. The fair value of the derivative asset is based on the difference in the fair value of the debt security determined as a straight debt instrument and the fair value of the debt security if converted as of the reporting date.

Commitment shares - Common stock of ILAL

Pursuant to the terms of the SPA with ILAL, the Company also received 350,000 shares (commitment shares) of ILALs common stock. The commitment shares were fully earned at the time of execution of the agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Schultz allowed2021, out of 350,000 commitment shares, the Company to defer $123,114 as accrued compensation. The Company owed Mr. Schultz $123,796sold 334,611 shares at various prices and $58,810 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expensesfair valued the remaining 15,389 shares at the closing stock price of ILAL as of September 30, 20182021. Realized gain on sale of shares and 2017,the unrealized loss on fair value of the remaining shares amounted to $179,046 and $5,153, respectively 

Total fair value of investment in equity securities as on September 30, 2021 and 2020 is $10,772 and $210,000, respectively. Deferred compensation

Investment in Equity Securities- LawClerk

In February 2020, the Company made a $250,000 strategic relationship investment in LawClerk for 200,000 Series A Preferred Shares of LawClerk. This investment is reported under duerecorded on a cost basis and adjusted for observable transactions for same or similar investments of the issuer (referred to related parties inas the consolidated balance sheets.measurement alternative) or impairment. The Company annually performs impairment analysis on this investment and there were 0impairments required for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.

Total value of this investment as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 is $250,000, respectively.

Refer the table below for a reconciliation of carrying value of all investments for the year ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

  ILAL Debt Securities ILAL Derivative asset ILAL Equity Securities Law Clerk Equity Securities
Balance as of October 1, 2019$    -   $      -   $         -   $                  -   
Purchased during the year             500,000                        -                               93,132                                   250,000
Unrealized gain on fair value recognized in income                      -               2,115,269                          116,868                                             -   
Balance as of September 30, 2020             500,000            2,115,269                          210,000                                   250,000
Shares sold during the year                      -                           -                            (373,121)                                             -   
Realized gain on fair value recognized income                      -                           -                            179,046                                             -   
Unrealized gain (loss) recognized in net income             -              2,790,387                             (5,153)                                             -   
Unrealized loss on fair value recognized in other comprehensive loss (5,392) -    -    -   
Balance as of September 30, 2021$         494,608$           4,905,656$                           10,772$                                  250,000

F-29
Table of Contents

5.    INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020:

            
September 30, 2021
  Intangible assets Accumulated amortization Total
Patents $74,112  $28,329  $45,783
Websites  8,115   8,115     
Customer list and non-compete agreement  6,892,024   4,940,456   1,951,568
Design assets  123,000   123,000     
Trademarks  5,928   2,236   3,692
Engineering trade secrets  4,370,269   2,943,173   1,427,096
Software  870,000   325,519   544,481
Strategic Contract  9,799,970   1,577,098   8,222,872
Infrastructure asset  81,868        81,868
mPulse software  741,846   238,161   503,685
Total $22,967,132  $10,186,087  $12,781,045

            
September 30, 2020
  Intangible assets Accumulated amortization Total
Patents $74,112  $24,471  $49,641
Websites  8,115   8,115     
Customer list and non-compete agreement  6,702,024   2,923,592   3,778,432
Design assets  123,000   41,000   82,000
Trademarks  5,928   1,805   4,123
Engineering trade secrets  4,370,269   2,331,858   2,038,411
Software  1,120,000   22,951   1,097,049
mVSO software  437,135   132,813   304,322
mPulse software  741,846   69,965   671,881
Total $13,582,429  $5,556,570  $8,025,859

Amortization expense for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 was $4,848,179 and $2,767,345, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, the Company executed two 15% promissory notes withrecorded an impairment of $554,322 related to write-off of software. There was no impairment during the year ended September 30, 2020.

The strategic contract relates to supply of a total face valuecritical input to our digital currency mining business at significantly low prices compared to market. During the year September 30, 2021, the initial allocation of $30,000$7,457,970 was adjusted by $2,342,000. The strategic contract is now carried at $9,799,970net of accumulated amortization of $1,577,098.

The Company expects to record amortization expense of intangible assets over the next 5 years and thereafter as follows:

Year September 30, 2021
2022  $4,494,533
2023   2,884,225
2024   2,471,413
2025   1,975,742
2026   398,644
Thereafter   556,488
In  $12,781,045

F-30
Table of Contents

6. IMPAIRMENT

During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company has incurred the following impairment loss on goodwill, digital currency and software. The Company did not incur any impairment loss for the year ended September 30, 2020.

Amount ($)
Impairment of digital currency6,608,076
Impairment of goodwill5,723,388
Impairment of software554,322
Total impairment loss12,885,786

For impairment relating to digital currency and goodwill, refer to Digital Currency and Business combinations, Intangible Assets and Goodwill. (See Note 2)

7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following as of September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020:

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Mining equipment $123,147,843     
Land and building  11,048,299     
Machinery and equipment  376,163   193,042
Leasehold improvements  72,577   17,965
Furniture and fixtures  107,660   82,547
Construction in progress  10,498,311     
Total  145,250,853   293,554
Less: accumulated depreciation  (7,657,982)  (175,560)
Property and equipment, net $137,592,871  $117,994

Depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 was $7,396,189 and $68,904, respectively. During the year ended September 30, 2020, the Company disposed of $48,898 of property and equipment resulting in a loss on disposal of $5,218. There was no disposal made during the year ended September 30, 2021.

The Company has purchased mining equipment for approximately $123.15 million during the year ended September 30, 2021. This primarily consisted of miners of $120.4 million with the spouseremaining consisting of ancillary mining equipment.

College Park Data Center: On May 19, 2021, the Company exercised its purchase option on the ATL lease agreement to purchase property for $4.4 million in College Park, Georgia. The property contains approximately six acres of land and includes approximately 41,000 square feet of office and warehouse space. ATL utilizes, and intends to continue utilizing, this space for cryptocurrency mining activities.

Construction in progress: The Company is expanding its facility in Atlanta, a build out adjacent to the ATL data center mentioned above.

Norcross Data Center: On August 6, 2021, CSRE Properties Norcross, LLC, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, purchased certain real property located in Norcross, Georgia for $6,550,000 plus transaction and settlement costs. The property consists of approximately seven acres of land and includes an approximately 87,000 square foot office building. The Company intends to utilize this office space to conduct certain of its cryptocurrency mining activities.

The Company has purchase commitments for approximately $144.04 million related to purchase of miners as of September 30, 2021, and the Company has paid $85.11 million towards these commitments as of the CEOend of our Company. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $30,000 and agreed to repay the note on demand.this period. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the remaining commitment for future payments was $58.93 million.

As of September 30, 2021, the Company owed $30,000 in principalhas outstanding deposits worth $87.9 million to premier suppliers and $2,832 in accrued interest under the termsmanufacturers for securing our purchases of mining equipment.

F-31
Table of Contents

 8.   LOANS

Long-term loans as of September 30, 2021 and 2020 consist of the agreement. following:

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
     
Promissory notes $    $531,169
        
Total $    $531,169

Promissory Notes

On JanuaryMay 7, 2020, the Company applied for a loan from Celtic Bank Corporation, as lender, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), as administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (the "SBA"). On May 15, 2020, the loan was approved, and the Company received the proceeds from the loan in the amount of $531,169 (the “PPP Loan”). The Company applied for and received loan forgiveness from the SBA on March 23, 2021. The entire principal balance and interest charges were forgiven. The gain on loan forgiveness of $531,169 is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended September 30, 2021.

9.  LEASES

On October 1, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligationsadopted the amendments to ASC 842, Leases, which requires lessees to recognize lease assets and liabilities arising from operating leases on the balance sheet. The Company adopted the new lease guidance using the modified retrospective approach and elected the transition option issued under ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) Targeted Improvements, allowing entities to continue to apply the notes throughlegacy guidance in ASC 840, Leases, to prior periods, including disclosure requirements.

The Company’s operating leases are office spaces and finance leases primarily in relation to the paymentequipment used at its data center.

The Company's lease costs recognized in the Consolidated Statements of all outstanding principalIncome and interest then outstanding.Comprehensive Loss consist of the following:

  2021 2020
Operating lease cost (1) $340,440  $117,223
Finance lease cost:       
   Amortization of right-of-use assets  303,292     
   Interest on lease obligations $42,992  $  

(1) Included in general and administrative expenses

Other lease information is as follows:

        
  Fiscal Years Ended September 30,
  2021 2020
Cash paid for amounts included in measurement of lease obligations:       
Operating cash flows from operating leases $319,061  $43,986
Financing cash flows from finance leases  288,602     

Operating cash flows from finance leases is $42,992 for the year ended September 30, 2021.

  2021 2020
Weighted-average remaining lease term -operating leases 5 years 0.4 years
Weighted-average remaining lease term - finance leases 3.2 years  — 
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases  4.5% 10%
Weighted-average discount rate - finance leases 5.5%   

 

F-32
Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of the Company's lease liabilities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2021:

Fiscal Year Operating Leases Finance Leases
2022  $316,908  $449,431
2023   324,948   321,887
2024   333,234   142,428
2025   341,767   12,320
2026   299,039   1,853
Thereafter   50,659     
Total undiscounted lease obligations   1,666,555   927,919
Less imputed interest   (175,035)  (55,813)
Total presnet value of lease liabilities  $1,491,520  $872,106
Less: Current portion of lease obligations  $256,195  $413,798
Total lease obligations, net of current portion  $1,235,325  $458,308

10.   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Zachary Bradford – President,Chief Executive Officer, Director and Former Chief Financial Officer and Director

The Company has a consulting agreement with ZRB Holdings, Inc, an entity wholly owned by Zachary Bradford, our Chief Financial Officer and director, for management services. In accordance with this agreement, as amended, Mr. Bradford provides services to us in exchange for $15,000 in compensation for services plus a $1,000 medical insurance stipend, each month plus a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Mr. Bradford for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. During the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017, Mr. Bradford earned $194,527 and $193,425, respectively, in accordance with this agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Bradford allowed2020, the Company to defer $87,746 as accrued compensation.paid Blue Chip Accounting, LLC (“Blue Chip”) $183,075 and $131,248, respectively, for accounting, tax, administrative services and reimbursement for office supplies. Blue Chip is 50% beneficially owned by Mr. Bradford. None of the services were associated with work performed by Mr. Bradford. The services consisted of preparing and filing tax returns, bookkeeping, accounting and administrative support assistance. The Company owed Mr. Bradford $89,351and $78,252 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expenses as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Deferred compensation is reported under due to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.

On August 13, 2017, the Company executed a 15% promissory note with a face value of $80,000 with Zachary Bradford, its President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $80,000 and agreed to repay the note evenly over 12 months. The Company repaid $73,333 and 6,667 in principal duringalso sub-leases office space from Blue Chip. During the years ended September 30, 20182021 and 2017, respectively. The Company incurred interest expense of $12,000 2020, $18,300 and $1,800 in interest during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company owed $0 and $73,333 in principal and $600 and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.$14,725, respectively, was paid to Blue Chip for rent.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eleven 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $189,690 with Zachary Bradford, its President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $189,690 and agreed to repay the notes on demand. As of September 30, 2018, Company owed $189,690 in principal and $10,733 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement. On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the notes through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding.

Bryan Huber – Chief operationsFormer Officer and Director

The Company has a consulting agreement with Bryan Huber, our Chief Operations Officer and director, for management services. In accordance with the original agreement, Mr. Huber provided services to us in exchange for $117,000 in compensation for services plus a $500 medical insurance stipend and a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. On August 28, 2018, the Company replaced the original agreement withexecuted an agreement with Zero Positive, LLC an entity controlled by Mr. Huber. In accordance with thisthe agreement with Zero Positive, LLC, Mr. Huber agrees to provide services through to the Company in exchange for $160,000 in annual compensation plus a $500 medical insurance stipend and a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. Under the agreement Mr. Huber was also granted a one-time bonus of $50,000, payment of which will be deferred until the Company completes a qualified financing that exceeds three-million dollars or average monthly revenues of the Company exceed one-million dollars for three months. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Zero Positive, LLC for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. Duringearned $125,154 during the year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, Mr. Huber and Zero positive earned $180,612 and $116,377, respectively,2020.

On March 12, 2020, the Agreement was terminated upon the execution of a separation agreement. All amounts owed from all agreements totaling, $90,000, were paid in accordance with this agreement. During the years ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Huber allowed the Company to defer $69,604 as accrued compensation. The Company owed Mr. Huber $73,625 and $6,288 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expenses as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Deferred compensation is reported under due to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.full.

F-18
Table of Contents

On May 10, 2018, Bryan Huber the Company’s Chief Operations Officer exercised warrants to purchase 1,353 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $1.50 for each share of common stock. The Company receive $2,030 as a result of this exercise.

On September 28, 2018, in connection with the consulting agreement executed with Zero Positive, LLC, the Company issued warrants to purchase 900,000 90,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 $8.00 per share to Zero Positive. The warrants were valued at $2,607,096 $2,607,096 using the Black Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 10 years, risk free interest rate of 3.05%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rate of 191%. The warrants vest as follows: 300,00030,000 vested immediately, the balance vest evenly on the last day of each month over forty-two months beginning August 31, 2018.As of September 30, 2018, 328,571 2020, 62,857 warrants had vested, and the Company recorded an expense of $951,797 $1,158,709 during the year ended September 30, 2018.2020.

Larry McNeill – Chairman of the Board of Directors

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eight 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $163,100 with Larry McNeill, a Director of the Company. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $163,100 and agreed to repay the note on demand. As of September 30, 2018, Company owed $163,100 in principal and $6,562 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement. On December 31, 2018, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the note through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding.

11. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Overview

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of September 30, 2018, thereThere were 36,116,447 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. 

Common Stock issuancesno transactions during the year ended September 30, 20182021.

During the period commencing October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018, the Company received $271,900 from 16 investors pursuant to private placement agreements with the investors to purchase 339,875 sharesMatthew Schultz- Executive Chairman of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock atBoard and Former Chief Executive Officer

The Company had a purchase price equal to $0.80consulting agreement with Matthew Schultz, for each sharemanagement services. Mr. Schultz, for management services. Mr. Schultz received $1,086,200 as compensation for his services as chairman of common stock.

Duringthe board during the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company issued 41,640 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock to settle accounts payable. The shares were valued at $75,734 and the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $41,092 result of the issuance.

In connection with the issuance of the March 23, 2018, Labrys Fund, LP Convertible Note, the Company issued, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 100,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”).2020. The agreement was amended on June 29, 2018 and as a resultterminated at the returnable shares were no longer returnable. Consequently, the fair valueconclusion of the returnable shares of $218,626 was charged to interest expense. On September 19, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $220,000 and $12,730, respectively was converted into 258,589 shares of the Company’s common stock. (See Note 8 for additional details)

In connection with the issuance of the Auctus Fund, LLC Convertible Note, the Company issued to Auctus, as a commitment fee, 137,500 shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 150,000 shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”). On September 21, 2018, all principal and accrued interest of $225,000 and $5,474, respectively was converted into 256,082 shares of the Company’s common stock. Subsequent tofiscal year ending September 30, 2018, as a result of2020 when Mr. Schultz’s position was changed from Chairman to Executive Chairman and he accepted the conversionassociated employment agreement.

The Company additionally entered into an agreement on November 15, 2019 with an organization to provide general investor relations and consulting services that Mr. Schultz is affiliated with. The Company paid the 137,500 returnable shares were returned toorganization $49,500 in fees plus $176,000 in expense reimbursements for the Company and cancelled. (See Note 8 for additional details)year ended September 30, 2020. The agreement was terminated in March 2020.

 F-19F-33 
Table of Contents 

In connection11.   STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Overview

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of September 30, 2021, there were 37,395,945 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,750,000 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding. As of September 30, 2020, there were 17,390,979 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 1,750,000 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

On December 5, 2019, the Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share. On December 10, 2019, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) approved the 1:10 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. The reverse stock split took effect on December 11, 2019. Unless otherwise noted, impacted amounts and share information in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, have been adjusted for the stock split as if such stock split occurred on the first day of the first period presented. There is no impact of this transaction in the year ended September 30, 2021.

Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

On October 4, 2019, pursuant to Article IV of our Articles of Incorporation, our Board of Directors voted to increase the number of shares of preferred stock designated as Series A Preferred Stock from one million (1,000,000) shares to two million (2,000,000) shares, par value $0.001 per share.

Under the Certificate of Designation for the Series A Preferred Stock, holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to quarterly dividends on 2% of our earnings before interest, taxes and amortization. The dividends are payable in cash or common stock. The company paid $177,502 in preferred stock dividends during the year ended September 30, 2021. The holders will also have a liquidation preference on the stated value of $0.02 per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. The holders are further entitled to have us redeem their Series A Preferred Stock for three shares of common stock in the event of a change of control and they are entitled to vote together with the issuanceholders of our common stock on all matters submitted to shareholders at a rate of forty-five (45) votes for each share held.

The rights of the EMA Financial, LLC Convertible Note,holders of Series A Preferred Stock are defined in the relevant Amendment to the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on October 9, 2019.

On October 2, 2020, the Company issued EMA, asfiled a commitment fee, 137,500Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to increase its authorized shares of its common stock (the “Returnable Shares”) as well as 100,000to 35,000,000.

On March 16, 2021, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to increase its authorized shares of its common stock (the “Non-Returnable Shares”). Subsequent to September 30, 2018, the Company repaid all obligations under the note and the 137,500 returnable shares were returned to the Company and cancelled on January 8, 2019. (See Note 8 for additional details)50,000,000.

On September 11, 2018,17, 2021, the Company entered into an agreementfiled its First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Amended and Restated Articles”) with Regal Consulting, LLCthe Secretary of State of the State of Nevada, which Amended and Restated Articles became effective upon filing. The Amended and Restated Articles were previously approved by the Company’s Board, subject to stockholder approval, on July 16, 2021, and were approved by the Company’s stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting and, among other things, increased the Company’s authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000.

Common Stock issuances for investor relations services. Under this agreement the year ended September 30, 2021

The Company agreed to issue 30,000issued 4,444,445 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its underwritten equity offering at a price of $9.00per monthshare for net proceeds of approximately $37.05 million.

The Company issued 9,090,910 shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with its underwritten public equity offering at a price of $22.00 per share for net proceeds of approximately $187.2 million.

The Company issued 236,000 shares of common stock as settlement of accrued bonus compensation related to the year ended September 30, 2020. The fair value of these shares was approximately $1.9 million and was fully expensed for in the prior year. The Company issued 327,725 shares of common stock for the current year related to bonus compensation. The fair value of these shares is approximately $3.07 million.

The Company issued 1,618,285shares of common stock in relation to the acquisition of ATL, which includes 809,142 shares held in escrow. The Company issued 477,703 shares of common stock in relation to the acquisition of SWS, which includes 310,000 shares held in escrow. (See Note 3 for additional details)

F-34
Table of Contents

The Company issued 57,045 shares of common stock for services plus $20,000 per monthrendered for a total fair value of approximately $815,000 which has been fully expensed during the year ended September 30, 2021.

The Company issued 389,745 shares of common stock in cash.relation to the exercise of stock options and warrants. (See Notes 12 and 13 for additional details)

The Company issued 15,577 restricted stock units to certain SWS employees as part of the transaction to incentivize the employees for retention purposes. These restricted stock units vest over a period of one year. As of September 30, 2018,2021, 4,582 of the restricted stock units had been forfeited. (See Note 13 for additional details)

On June 3, 2021, the Company had issued 30,000entered into an At The Market Offering Agreement (“ATM”) with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, to create an at-the-market equity program under which the Company may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of its common stock in accordancehaving an aggregate gross offering price of up to $500,000,000 to or through H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC. During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company issued 3,443,379 shares of the Company’s common stock under the ATM for net proceeds of $46.4 million. The shares were sold pursuant to a prospectus dated March 15, 2021 and a prospectus supplement dated June 3, 2021 filed with the agreement. Stock compensation of $55,100 was recorded asSEC.

Common stock returned during the year ended September 30, 2021

As a result of an adjustment of holdback shares to actual milestones earned in relation to the stock issued underp2k acquisition, 8,072 shares were returned and cancelled. (See Note 3 for additional details)

As a result of an adjustment of holdback shares pursuant to Article II and Schedule A of that certain Agreement and Plan of ATL Merger in connection with the agreement.acquisition of ATL, 68,194 shares were returned and cancelled. (See Note 3 for additional details)

15,000 shares, held in escrow as collateral, were returned from a lender on September 30, 2021.

Common Stock issuances during the year ended September 30, 20172020

During the period commencing October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017, the Company received $880,000 from 38 investors pursuant to private placement agreements with the investors to purchase 1,101,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.80 for each share of Common stock.

In November of 2016, theThe Company issued 2,932,7041,964,313 shares of common stock in accordance with the terms of the convertible debt agreement due to two officers for the cashless exercise of 3,000,000 options.decrease in stock price.

In December of 2016, theThe Company issued 1,466,35222,000 shares of common stock for services rendered to independent consultants at a director for the cashless exercisefair value of 1,500,000 options.$54,000.

On April 13, 2017, theThe Company issued 25,000793 shares of common stock as a result of rounding related to a consultantthe reverse stock split.

The Company issued 95,699 shares of common stock in relation to the acquisition of p2k.

In relation to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 2018, the Company issued 1,125,000 shares of common stock for services. The shares were valuedthe conversion of $1,250,000 in principal and $437,500 in interest at $2.75 per share or $68,750, which was the quoted closingan effective conversion price of our Common stock on$1.50 per share.

In relation to the date of issuance.

On February 9, 2017,Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 17, 2019, the Company entered intoissued 8,241,665 shares of common stock for the conversion of $10,750,000 in principal and $1,612,500 in interest as a Debt Settlement Agreement with Webcor Construction LP (“Webcor”) to settle $158,753 in debt owed to Webcor. conversion premium at an effective conversion price of $1.50 per share.

The Company agreed to pay Webcor $58,000 on or before February 28, 2017 and to issue 50,000issued 28,381 shares of the Company’s common stock within 4 days of execution. Upon receipt of payment, Webcor agreed to release the full amount of the debt. The shares issued were deemed to haveas board and executive compensation at a fair value of $212,500$71,600.

The Company issued 1,230,770 shares of common stock as a result of a registered direct offering resulting in total consideration of $4,000,000.

The Company issued 6,913 shares of common stock as a result of a cashless exercise of 15,000 common stock warrants.

F-35
Table of Contents

The Company issued 26,427 shares of common stock in relation to the acquisition of GridFabric

Common stock returned during the year ended September 30, 2020

As a result of a note payoff on the dateDecember 5, 2019, 5,000 shares common stock were returned to treasury and cancelled on January 13, 2020.

As a result of the transactioncancellation of an investor relations services contract, 25,000 shares were returned to treasury and cancelled on February 10, 2020.

Series A Preferred Stock issuances during the year ended September 30, 2020

On October 4, 2019, the Company authorized the issuance of a loss on settlementtotal of debtseven hundred and fifty thousand (750,000) shares of $111,747its designated Series A Preferred Stock to members of its board of directors for services rendered. A fair value of $0.02 per share was determined by the Company. Director fees of $15,000 was recorded as a result of the Debt Settlement Agreement. The cash payment was made per the agreement on February 28, 2017.stock issued.

12.   STOCK WARRANTS

The following is a summary of stock warrant activity during the years ended September 30, 20182021 and September 30, 2017. 2020.

 Number of Warrant Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Number of Warrant Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Balance, September 30, 2016  13,112,100  $0.59
Balance, September 30, 2019  1,314,065  $21.70
Warrants granted  —    $—           
Warrants expired  —     —           
Warrants canceled  —     —           
Warrants exercised  (4,500,000)  0.083  (15,000)  8.00
Balance, September 30, 2017  8,612,100  $0.85
Balance, September 30, 2020  1,299,065   21.78
Warrants granted  1,191,600  $0.80         
Warrants expired  —     —    (432,721)  15.00
Warrants canceled  —     —         —  
Warrants exercised  (814,401)  0.36  (250,790)  11.77
Balance, September 30, 2018  8,989,299  $0.89
Balance, September 30, 2021  615,554   30.72

F-20
Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2018,2021, the outstanding warrants have a weighted average remaining term of was 4.850.71 years and an intrinsic value of $45,021,758.$389,243.

As of September 30, 2018, there are warrants exercisable to purchase 8,417,870 shares of common stock in the Company and 571,429 unvested warrants outstanding that cannot be exercised until vesting conditions are met. 4,498,647 of the outstanding warrants require a cash investment of $1.50 per share to exercise and 4,490,652 of the outstanding warrants contain provisions allowing a cashless exercise at their respective exercise price.

Warrant activity for the year ended September 30, 2018

During the year ended September 30, 2018, certain investors exercised warrants to purchase 258,4012021, a total of 173,990 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the exercise of common stock warrants at purchaseexercise prices ranging from $0.083 to $1.50. The Company received$3.36 and $20.00, for total proceedsconsideration of $44,938 from the warrant exercises.$2,883,623.

During the year endedOn September 30, 2018,2021, a total of 459,88974,437 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the cashless exercise of 556,00076,800 common stock warrants with anat exercise prices ranging from $0.83 to $3.67.

As of $0.36.

On January 1, 2018, the Company issuedSeptember 30, 2021, there are warrants exercisable to purchase 100,000 609,840 shares of common stock at anin the Company and 5,714 unvested warrants outstanding that cannot be exercised until vesting conditions are met. 418,834of the warrants require a cash investment to exercise priceas follows: 2,500required a cash investment of $0.80 $8.00 per share. 103,000 require a cash investment of $25.00 per share, to an advisor for business advisory services. The warrants were valued at $234,095 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The warrants vest evenly over the six-month service period ended September 30, 2018. 

On June 15, 2018, the Company issued 116,600 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to200,000 require a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 for additional details.)

On August 1, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 for additional details.)

On August 28, 2018, in connection with the Consulting agreement executed with Zero Positive, LLC. the Company issued warrants to purchase 900,000 sharescash investment of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 $35.00 per share, to an Zero Positive. The10,000 require a cash investment of $40.00 per share, 60,000 require a cash investment of $50.00 per share, 38,334 require a cash investment of $75.00 per share and 5,000 require a cash investment of $100.00 per share. 196,720 of the outstanding warrants were valuedcontain provisions allowing a cashless exercise at $2,607,096 using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The warrants vest as follows: 300,000 warrants vested immediately, the balance vest evenly on the last day of each month over the forty-two months beginning August 31, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, 328,571 warrants had vested, and the Company recorded an expense of $951,797 during the year ended September 30, 2018. (See Note 10 for additional details.)their respective exercise prices.

On September 20, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 for additional details.)

On September 21, 2018, the Company issued 25,000 5-year warrants exercisable at $0.80 to a lender in connection with a promissory note agreement. (See Note 7 for additional details.)

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the warrants granted during the year ended September 30, 2018:

Fair value assumptions – Warrants:September 30, 2018
Risk free interest rate2.01-3.05%
Expected term (years)5-10
Expected volatility158%-265%
Expected dividends0%

Warrant activity for the year ended September 30, 20172020

In the year endedOn September 30, 2017, the Company issued 4,399,05625, 2020, a total of 6,913 shares of the Company’s common stock to two officers and a director forwere issued in connection with the cashless exercise of 4,500,000 options with a strike15,000 common stock warrants at an exercise price of $0.83.$8.00.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company expects to recognize $1,655,299 of stock-based compensation for the non-vested outstanding warrants over a weighted-average period of 3.33 years.

 F-21F-36 
Table of Contents 

13.   STOCK OPTIONSSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company sponsors a stock-based incentive compensation plan known as the 2017 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was established by the Board of Directors of the Company on June 19, 2017. A totalOn October 7, 2020, the Company executed a first amendment to the Plan to increase its share pool from 300,000 to 1,500,000 shares of 3,000,000common stock.

On September 15, 2021, the shareholders approved and the Company executed a second amendment to (i) increase the number of shares were initially reservedof common stock authorized for issuance under the Plan by an additional 2,000,000 shares, resulting in an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Plan, and (ii) revise Section 19 of the Plan to more closely align with the provisions of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and Section 17.2 of the Plan.

As of September 30, 2018,2021, there were 2,680,7941,225,351 shares available for issuance under the plan.Plan.

The Plan allows the Company to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation right,rights, or restricted stock.stock units. The incentive stock options are exercisable for up to ten years, at an option price per share not less than the fair market value on the date the option is granted. The incentive stock options are limited to persons who are regular full-time employees of the Company at the date of the grant of the option. The option vesting schedule for options granted is determined by the Board of Directors at the time of the grant. The Plan provides for accelerated vesting of unvested options if there is a change in control, as defined in the Plan.

Non-qualified options may be granted to any person, including, but not limited to, employees, independent agents, consultants and attorneys, who the Company’s Board believes have contributed, or will contribute, to the success of the Company. Non-qualified options may be issued at option prices of less than fair market value on the date of grant and may be exercisable for up to ten years from date of grant. As of September 30, 2021, no non-qualified options were granted to any person.

The option vesting scheduleCompany recognized $3,868,927 and $3,608,885 for options granted is determined by the Board of Directors atyears ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020, respectively, in stock-based compensation under the time of the grant. The Plan provides for accelerated vesting of unvested options if there is a change in control, as defined in the Plan.stock-based incentive compensation plan.

STOCK OPTIONS

The following is a summary of stock option activity during the years ended September 30, 2018 and year ended September 30, 2017. 2021: 

 Number of Option Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Number of Option Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Balance, September 30, 2016  —   $—  
Balance, September 30, 2019  81,254   11.82
Options granted  6,902 $3.45  233,233   5.28
Options expired  —    —    (25,692)  8.71
Options canceled  —    —    (10,847)  19.04
Options exercised  —    —           
Balance, September 30, 2017  6,902 $3.45
Balance, September 30, 2020  277,948   6.34
Options granted  312,304 $1.13  1,469,250   19.32
Options expired  —    —    (12,975)  10.53
Options canceled  —    —    (45,876)  16.31
Options exercised  —    —    (141,318)  6.14
Balance, September 30, 2018  319,206 $1.18
Balance, September 30, 2021  1,547,029   18.35

As of September 30, 2018,2021, there are options exercisable to purchase 208,932525,646 shares of common stock in the Company and 110,2741,028,383 unvested options outstanding that cannot be exercised until vesting conditions are met. As of September 30, 2018,2021, the outstanding options have a weighted average remaining term of was 2.264.03 years and an intrinsic value of $2,871,783.$1,579,336.

F-37
Table of Contents

Option activity for the year ended September 30, 20182021

During the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, a total of 141,318 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued in connection with the exercise of 141,318 common stock options at exercise prices ranging from $4.65to $24.40, for a total consideration of $867,308.

During the year ended September 30, 2021, the Company issued 62,304 granted 1,469,250 options with a total fair value of $21,582,485 to purchase shares of the common stock to employees,employees. The Company offset $953,125 of stock compensation expense against bonuses accrued during the prior year and recognized $7,731,606 during the year. The shares were granted at quoted market prices ranging from $1.57 $7.55 to $3.45. $34.67 and were valued at issuance using the Black Scholes model. 

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the options granted during year ended September 30, 2021:

Fair value assumptions Options:September 30, 2021
Risk free interest rate0.10-0.41%
Expected term (years)1.5-5.25
Expected volatility140% to 239%
Expected dividends0%

As of September 30, 2021, the Company expects to recognize $16,434,789 of stock-based compensation for the non-vested outstanding options over a weighted-average period of 2.47 years.

Option activity for the year ended September 30, 2020

During the year ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued 233,233 options to purchase shares of common stock to employees, the options were granted with exercise prices equal to the then current quoted market prices ranging from $4.50 to $8.50. The options were valued at issuance using the Black Scholes model and stock compensation expense of $130,000$716,740 was recorded as a result of the issuances.

On March 10, 2018 the Company issued a total of 250,000 options to four consultants for advisory services. The options vest evenly 12 months from issuance. The options expire 24 months after issuance and require a cash investment to exercise. The options were valued at issuance using the Black Scholes model at $342,500 and amortized of the term of the agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, $191,526 was been expensed as stock-based compensation.

F-22
Table of Contents

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the options granted during the year ended September 30, 2018:2020:

Fair value assumptions Options:September 30, 20182020
Risk free interest rate1.46-2.78%0.85 to 1.73%
Expected term (years)2-33-5
Expected volatility120%-191%124% to 209%
Expected dividends0%

Option activity

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

The Company grants RSUs that contain either a) service conditions, or b) performance conditions, or c) market performance conditions. RSUs containing service conditions vest monthly or annually. RSUs containing performance conditions generally vest over 1 year, and the number of shares earned depends on the achievement of predetermined Company metrics.

When the criteria for the year ended September 30, 2017

During the year ended September 30, 2017,vesting is met, the Company issued 6,902 optionsrecognizes the expense equal to purchase sharesthe total fair value of the common stock to employees,price on the shares were granted at quoted market price of $3.45. The shares were valued at issuance using the Black Scholes model and stock compensation expense of $16,665 was recorded as a resultgrant date. All of the issuances.RSUs issued prior to September 30, 2021 were either vested or forfeited and cancelled.

F-38
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the performance-based restricted stock units at the maximum award amounts based upon the respective performance share agreements. Actual shares that will vest depend on the attainment of the performance-based criteria.

 Number of Shares 

 Weighted

Average Grant-

Date Fair Value

Per Share

 

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at September 30, 2020               
Granted   579,302  $10.53  $1,669,711
Vested   (558,475) $10.03  $1,651,231
Forfeited   (9,832) $17.98  $18,480
Outstanding at September 30, 2021   10,995  $27.73     

 

The Black-Scholes model utilized the following inputs to value the options granted during the year ended September 30, 2017:

Fair value assumptions – Options:September 30, 2017
Risk free interest rate1.46-1.50%
Expected term (years)3
Expected volatility116%-120%
Expected dividends0%

As of September 30, 2018,2021, the Company expectshad $123,216 unrecognized compensation cost related to recognize $150,974 millionrestricted stock unit awards that will be recognized over a weighted average period of0.4 years.

The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses related to restricted stock units, of $3,862,679 for the non-vested outstanding options over a weighted-average period of 0.44 years.fiscal 2021. The Company recognized $1,904,520 in stock-based compensation expense for restricted stock units issued in 2021 related to 2020 bonuses.

14.   INCOME TAXES

The Company provides for income taxes under FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. FASB ASC 740 requires the use of an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and the tax rates in effect currently.

FASB ASC 740 requires the reduction of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance, if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In the Company’s opinion, it is uncertain whether they will generate sufficient taxable income in the future to fully utilize the net deferred tax asset. Accordingly, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been recorded. The total deferred tax asset is approximately $5.8$38.8 million as of September 30, 20182021 which is calculated by multiplying a 21% estimated tax rate by the cumulative net operating loss (NOL)(“NOL”) of approximately $27.6$184.6 million.

Due to the enactment of the Tax Reform Act of 2017, we have calculated our deferred tax assets using an estimated corporate tax rate of 21%. USU.S. Tax codes and laws may be subject to further reform or adjustment which may have a material impact to the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 20182021 and 20172020 are as follows:

As of September 30, 2018 2017 2021 2020
Cumulative tax net operating losses (in millions) $27.6  $21.0 $184.6  $52.5
              
Deferred tax asset (in millions) $5.8  $4.4  $38.8  $11.0
Valuation allowance (in millions)  (5.8)  (4.4)  (38.8)  (11.0)
Current taxes payable  —     —            
Income tax expense $—    $—    $    $ 

As of September 30, 2018,2021, and 2017,2020, the Company had gross federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $27.6$184.6 million and $21.0$52.5 million, respectively.

The Company plans to file its U.S. federal return for the year ended September 30, 20182021 upon the issuance of this filing. Upon filing of the tax return for the year ended September 30, 20182021 the actual deferred tax asset and associated valuation allowance available to the Company may differ from management’smanagements estimates. The tax years 2014-20172015-2019 remained open to examination for federal income tax purposes by the major tax jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. No tax returns are currently under examination by any tax authorities.

 F-23F-39 
Table of Contents 

15.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Office leases

The Company’s corporate officesCompany has purchase commitments that are located at 70 North Main Street, Suite 105, Bountiful, Utah 84010. The Company occupies the leased space on a monthcancellable of approximately $144.04 million related to month basis at a ratepurchase of $850 per month. Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilitiesminers as of September 30, 2018, are $0.

On May 15, 2018,2021, and the Company executed a 37-month lease agreement, which commenced on July 1, 2018 at 4360 Viewridge Avenue, Suite C, San Diego, California. has paid $85.11 million towards these commitments as of the end of this period. As of September 30, 2021, the remaining commitment for future payments was $58.93 million.

The agreement callsCompany has purchase commitments for the Company to make paymentsinfrastructure assets and other mining equipment of $4,057 in base rent per month through July 31, 2021 subject to an annual 3% rent escalation. Future minimum lease payments under the operating leases for the facilitiesapproximately $6,512,000 as of September 30, 2018, are2021 and the Company has paid $4,576,000 towards these commitments as follows:of end of this period.

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our obligations to make contractual future payments towards our agreements as of September 30, 2021:

 20222023202420252026ThereafterTotal
Recorded contractual obligations:       
Operating lease obligations$316,908$324,948$333,234$341,767$299,039$50,659$1,666,555
Finance Lease obligations   449,431   321,887   142,428     12,320       1,853                927,919
Miner equipment58,930,880     58,930,880
Infrastructure assets1,936,000     1,936,000
Total$61,633,219$646,835$475,662$354,087$300,892$50,659$63,461,354

Contingent consideration

GridFabric: On August 31, 2020, the Company acquired GridFabric, LLC. Pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement, additional shares of the Company’s common stock valued at up to $750,000 were issuable if GridFabric achieves certain revenue and product release milestones. On September 30, 2021, the contingent consideration was re-measured to $500,000.

Subsequent to September 30, 2021, the Company settled all contingent consideration due to GridFabric resulting in a payment of 8,404 shares of common stock valued at $150,000.

Fiscal year ending September 30, 2019$49,049
Fiscal year ending September 30, 2020$50,521
Fiscal year ending September 30, 2021$43,170

Contracts and awards

TheSolar Watt Solutions: On February 24, 2021, the Company was awarded a $900,000 contract from Bethel-Webcor JV. Underacquired Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. Pursuant to the contract terms we will install a turn-key advanced microgrid system at the U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton. The contract is in direct support of the United States Departmentpurchase agreement, additional cash consideration of Navy's communication information system (CIS) operations complexup to $2,500,000 (fair valued at $155,000 at acquisition date) in cash held back by the U.S. Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton that was recently awardedCompany and only payable pro rata to Sellers upon meeting certain future milestones and subject to satisfaction of any amounts owing from SWS to the Joint-Venture.Company resulting from damages required to be indemnified under the SWS Merger Agreement. The Company begin on-site work for this project in February of 2018 and expectscontingent cash consideration was re-measured to complete its scope of work in early 2019.

16.   MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND VENDORS

For the years ended$320,802 at September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had the following customers that represented more than 10% of sales.

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Bethel-Webcor JV-1  70.42%  10.8%
Daoust  11.82%  —  
Jacobs/ HDR a joint venture  —     13.0%
Macerich  —     24.4%
Firenze  —     20.0%

2021.

For the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had the following suppliers that represented more than 10% of direct material costs.

  September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
CED Greentech  13.57%  54.9%
Rexel USA, Inc.  27.47%  —  
ESS, Inc.  19.29%  —  
Ideal Power, Inc.  14.72%  —  
Integrated power systems  —     11.5%
Simpliphi Power  1.8%  27.6%

 F-24F-40 
Table of Contents 

17.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTSLegal contingencies

IssuanceFrom time to time we may be subject to litigation. Risks associated with legal liability are difficult to assess and quantify, and their existence and magnitude can remain unknown for significant periods of Common stocktime. We have acquired liability insurance to reduce such risk exposure to the Company. Despite the measures taken, such policies may not cover future litigation, or the damages claimed may exceed our coverage which could result in contingent liabilities.

During

Bishins v. CleanSpark, Inc. et al.

On January 20, 2021, Scott Bishins (“Bishins”), individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (together, the period commencing October 1, 2018 through December 10, 2018,“Class”), filed a class action complaint (the “Class Complaint”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company, received $361,800 fromits Chief Executive Officer, Zachary Bradford (“Bradford”), and its Chief Financial Officer, Lori Love (“Love”) (the “Class Action”). The Class Complaint alleges that, between December 31, 2020 and January 14, investors pursuant2021, the Company, Bradford, and Love “failed to private placement agreements withdisclose to investors: (1) that the investors to purchase 452,250 sharesCompany had overstated its customer and contract figures; (2) that several of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.80 for each share of common stock.

During the period commencing October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the Company issued 90,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock to Regal Consulting, LLC for investor relations services.

During the period commencing October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, the Company issued 30,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stockrecent acquisitions involved undisclosed related party transactions; and 30,000 warrants to a Consultant for services.

Warrant exercise

On October 2, 2018, an investor exercised warrants to purchase 3,000 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value common stock at a purchase price equal to $0.363 for each share of Common stock. The Company receive $1,089(3) that, as a result of this exercise.

On January 7, 2019,the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a total of 1,444,170 sharesreasonable basis.” (the “Class Allegations”). The Class Complaint seeks: (a) certification of the Class, (b) an award of compensatory damages to the Class, and (c) an award of reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the Class in the litigation. To date, no class has been certified in the Class Action. Currently, there is a pending motion to appoint lead class plaintiff, at which point dispositive motions may be filed.

Although the ultimate outcome of the Class Action cannot be determined with certainty, the Company stands behind all of its prior statements and disclosures and believes that the claims raised in the Class Complaint are entirely without merit. The Company intends to both defend itself vigorously against these claims and to vigorously prosecute any counterclaims.

Notwithstanding the Class Allegations’ lack of merit, however, the Class Action may distract the Company and cost the Company’s common stock were issuedmanagement time, effort and expense to defend against the claims made in connectionthe Class Complaint. Notwithstanding the Company’s belief that the Company and its management have complied with all of their obligations under applicable securities regulations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of the Class Action, and in the event the Company does not prevail in such action, the Company, its business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

Ciceri, derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark, Inc., v. Bradford, Love, Schultz, Beynon, McNeill, and Wood (consolidated with Perna, derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark, Inc., v. Bradford, Love, Schultz, Beynon, McNeill, and Wood)

On May 26, 2021, Andrea Ciceri (“Ciceri”), derivatively on behalf of CleanSpark, Inc., filed a verified shareholder derivative action (the “Ciceri Derivative Action”) in the United States District Court in the District of Nevada against Chief Executive Officer, Zachary Bradford (“Bradford”), Chief Financial Officer, Lori Love (“Love”) and Directors Matthew Schultz, Roger Beynon, Larry McNeill and Tom Wood (Bradford, Love and Directors collectively referred to as “Defendants.”) On June 22, 2021, Mark Perna (“Perna”) filed a verified shareholder derivative action (the “Perna Derivative Action”) in the same Court against the same Defendants making substantially similar allegations. On June 29, 2021, the court consolidated the Ciceri Derivative Action with the cashless exercisePerna Derivative Action in accordance with a stipulation among the parties (the consolidated case referred to as the “Derivative Action”). The Derivative Action alleges that Defendants: (1) made materially false and misleading public statements about the Company’s business and prospects; (2) did not maintain adequate internal controls; and (3) did not disclose several related party transactions benefitting insiders, questionable uses of 1,500,000 common stock warrants withcorporate assets, and excessive compensation. The claims asserted against all Defendants include breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. A claim for contribution under Sections 10(b) and 21D of the Securities and Exchange Act is asserted against only Bradford and Love. The Derivative Action seeks declaratory relief, monetary damages, and imposition of adequate corporate governance and internal controls. Plaintiffs were given the opportunity to submit an exercise prices of $0.083.

Amended Complaint by November 25, 2021, but elected not to. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be due by January 20, 2022.

Issuance of Stock options to employees

During the period commencing October 1, 2018 through January 1, 2019, the Company issued 111,682 options to purchase shares of the common stock to employees, the shares were granted at quoted market prices ranging from $1.51 to $5.90.

Loans from related parties

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eight 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $163,100 with Larry McNeill, a Director of the Company. Subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed one additional 15% promissory note with a total face value of $50,000. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received a total of $213,100 and agreed to repay the note on demand. On December 31, 2018, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the note through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding of $213,100 and $5,816, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eleven 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $189,690 with Zachary Bradford, its President and Chief Financial Officer. Subsequent to the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed two additional 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $25,030. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received a total of $214,720 and agreed to repay the notes on demand. On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the notes through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding of $214,720 and $3,037, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed two 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $30,000 with the spouse of the CEO of our Company. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $30,000 and agreed to repay the note on demand. On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the notes through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding of $30,000 and $383, respectively.

Convertible note repayments

EMA Financial, LLC – August 21, 2018 Promissory Note

On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the EMA note through the payment of all outstanding principal, prepayment penalties and interest then outstanding of $225,000, $35,000 and $10,736, respectively.

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to the Purchaser, as a commitment fee, 137,500 returnable shares of its common stock. As a result of the repayment the shares were returned to treasury and cancelled on January 8, 2019.

Labrys Fund, LP – September 19, 2018 Promissory Note

On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the Labrys Fund, LP note through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding of $330,000 and $11,609, respectively.

Auctus Fund, LLC –July 2, 2018 Promissory Note

In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to the Purchaser, as a commitment fee, 137,500 returnable shares of its common stock. As a result of the conversion of the note on September 21, 2018, the shares were returned to treasury and cancelled on December 21, 2018.

 F-25F-41 
Table of Contents 

Convertible notes executedAlthough the ultimate outcome of the Derivative Action cannot be determined with certainty, the Company stands behind all of its prior statements and disclosures, and believes that the claims raised in that case are entirely without merit. The Company intends to both defend itself vigorously against these claims and to vigorously prosecute any counterclaims.

Notwithstanding the Derivative Action’s lack of merit, however, it may distract the Company and cost the Company’s management time, effort and expense to defend against the claims. Notwithstanding the Company’s belief that the Company and its management have complied with all of their obligations under applicable securities regulations, no assurance can be given as to the outcome of the Derivative Action, and in the event the Company does not prevail in such action, the Company, its business, financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. 

On December 31, 2018,16.   MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND VENDORS

Digital Currency Mining Segment

For the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with an otherwise unaffiliated third-party institutional investor (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the Company issued to the Investor a Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture (the “Debenture”) in the aggregate face value of $5,250,000. The note is secured by all assets of the Company. The Debenture has a maturity date two years from the issuance date and the Company has agreed to pay compounded interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Debenture at the rate equal 7.5% per annum. Interest is payable on the date the applicable principal is converted or on maturity. The interest must be paid in cash and, in certain circumstances, may be paid in shares of common stock.

The transactions described above closed on December 31, 2018. In connection with the issuance of the Debenture and pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the Company issued to the Investor 100,000 shares of common stock and a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to acquire up to 3,083,333 shares of common stock for a term of three years (the “Warrant”) on a cash-only basis at an exercise price of $2.00 per share with respect to 1,250,000 Warrant Shares, $2.50 with respect to 1,000,000 Warrant Shares, $5.00 with respect to 500,000 Warrant Shares and $7.50 with respect to 333,333 Warrant Shares.

Pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the Investor agreed to tender to the Company the sum of $5,000,000, of which the Company received the full amount as of the closing.

Pursuant to the SPA, the Company agreed to sell the Debenture, the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Debenture, the Warrant and the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrant pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No 333-228063), declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2018.

Prior to the maturity date, provided that no trigger event has occurred, the Company will have the right at any time upon 30 trading days’ prior written notice, in its sole and absolute discretion, to redeem all or any portion of the Debenture then outstanding by paying to the Investor an amount equal to 140% of the of the portion of the Debenture being redeemed.

The Investor may convert the Debenture into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 95% of the mathematical average of the 5 lowest individual daily volume weighted average prices of the common stock, less $.05 per share, during the period beginning on the issuance date and ending on the maturity date subject to certain floor price restrictions. In the event certain equity conditions exist, the Company may require that the Investor convert the Debenture. In no event shall the Debenture be allowed to affect a conversion if such conversion, along with all other shares of Company common stock beneficially owned by the Investor and its affiliates would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company.

On January 7, 2019, the investor converted $2,500,000 in principal and $875,000 in interest as a conversion premium, for 1,784,729 shares of the Company common stock at an effective conversion price of $1.90, due to a trigger event for the Company not filing its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 on or before December 31, 2018. 2021, the digital currency mining business had the following customers that represented more than 10% of revenue. For these purposes customers are defined as the Company’s mining pool operators.

September 30, 2021
Mining Pool Operator A55.72%
Mining Pool Operator B44.28%

Repayment of Promissory Notes

Subsequent toFor the year ended September 30, 2018,2021, the Company settled 8 promissory notes (See Note 8) throughhad the repaymentfollowing significant suppliers of outstanding principalmining equipment.

September 30, 2021
Vendor A49.9%
Vendor B37.4%
Vendor C2.8%

Energy Segment

For the years ended September 30, 2021 and accrued interest totaling to $420,208September 2020, the energy business had the following customers that represented more than 10% of revenue.

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Customer A  48.88%  58.31%
Customer B  12.36%  0%
Customer C  0%  11.56%

For the years ended September 30, 2021 and $7,565, respectively.

On December 31, 2018,2020, the Company settlement a $52,500 promissory note (See Note 8) throughhad the issuancefollowing suppliers that represented more than 10% of 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and payment of $27,500 in outstanding principal and interest then outstanding of $1,467.direct material costs.

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
Vendor A  32.2% 85.55%
Vendor B  23.4% 0%

 F-26F-42 
Table of Contents 

17. SEGMENT REPORTING

We disclose segment information that is consistent with the way in which management operates and views the business. Our operating structure contains two reportable segments: Digital Currency and Energy. The Company measures the results of its segments using, among other measures, each segment's sales and operating income, which includes certain corporate overhead allocations.

Digital Currency. This segment consists of operation related to Bitcoin mining. The Company provides computing power through ATL Data Centers LLC and CleanBlok Inc. to the mining pools. This segment also includes operation related to maintenance of real property holdings for company purposes through CSRE properties Norcross LLC and CSRE properties LLC. This segment revenue represents fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award received from the mining pool operator in exchange of computing power.

Energy. This segment provides services, equipment, and software to the energy industry. This segment includes revenue from providing engineering and construction services, selling equipment such as residential battery, residential solar, commercial solar and non-customized equipment and providing access to its energy software offerings and software license sales and support services. 

Corporate and Other. This includes revenue from providing design, software development, and other technology-based consulting services through p2k Labs and data center services through ATL Data Center.

We allocate expenses related to corporate activities to the segments, and corporate overhead to CleanSpark Inc. Corporate Items and eliminations consist of corporate overhead and other items not allocated to any of the Company's segments as in the table below. Intersegment transactions, which were at market price, are included in the “Other revenue and eliminations” and “Corporate items and eliminations” in the table below.

17. SEGMENT REPORTING - Segment Information

        
   September 30, 2021   September 30, 2020
Revenue       
Energy  $9,002,636  $ 9,018,023
Digital Currency Mining  38,846,633     
Total segment revenues  47,849,269   9,018,023
Other revenue and eliminations  1,588,846   1,010,678
Consolidated Revenues  49,438,115   10,028,701
Profit       
Energy  (8,111,138)  (13,554,515)
Digital Currency Mining  23,198,270     
Total segment profit/(loss)  15,087,132   (13,554,515)
        
Corporate items and eliminations (including depreciation and amortization)  (36,899,142)   (9,791,628)
Net loss $ (21,812,010) $ (23,346,143)

For details on major customers of Digital currency and Energy segment, see Note 16.

F-43

A summary of segment assets is as follows: 

  September 30, 2021 September 30, 2020
     
Digital Currency Mining $270,995,942  $  
        
Energy $17,507,314  $13,621,190
        
Other and Corporate assets $28,969,865  $8,718,873
        
Total 317,473,121  $22,340,063

The Company has its geographic operations only in United States.

Total additions in long-lived assets during the years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

                        
  September 30,2021 September 30,2020
  Digital Currency Energy Corporate Digital Currency Energy Corporate
Property Plant and Equipment $144,743,498  $212,178  $972  $    $28,937  $18,108
Intangibles  9,881,838   190,000             1,381,633   833,000
Capitalized software                      84,924     
Total $154,625,336  $402,178  $972  $—    $1,495,494  $851,108

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

We have evaluated events occurring between the end of the most recent fiscal year and the date the financial statements were issued through December 14, 2021. There were no material subsequent events except as disclosed below:

Georgia Power Agreement

Effective October 1, 2021, the Company entered into certain agreements with Georgia Power Company (“Georgia Power”), for electrical services to the Company’s facilities in Norcross, Georgia. The agreements have an initial term of five years, during which time the power utilized by the Company will be billed under the Georgia Power Real Time Pricing (“RTP”) rate, where a portion of the usage is priced hourly and another portion is billed at a conventional rate.

In addition, the Company agreed to pay Georgia Power a one-time fee of approximately $2.0 million to install additional power equipment on the property.

Mining Equipment Purchase Agreements

On October 6 and October 14, 2021, the Company entered into agreements that are cancellable with a mining equipment supplier to purchase an aggregate of 6,750 mining servers. As compensation for the mining equipment, the Company agreed to pay the supplier up to an aggregate amount of approximately $49.5 million, of which, approximately $28.6was paid upon execution of the agreements, with the remainder to be paid in monthly installments through June 2022. The Company currently expects to receive the mining equipment in nine equal monthly shipments from November 2021 through July 2022 and plans to use the mining equipment to expand its digital currency mining activities through its wholly owned subsidiaries.

In November 2021, the Company entered into a new purchase agreement that is cancellable for a total of 2,597 mining machines with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $26.5 million.

Immersion Cooling System Purchase

On December 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase an immersion cooling system and related equipment with a purchase price of approximately $9.6 million.

The Company issued 4,017,652 shares under its At the Market financing instrument resulting in proceeds of approximately $68 million.

The Company issued 25,775 shares as a result of stock option exercises resulting in proceeds of $189,677.

On November 23, 2021, the Company settled all contingent consideration due to GridFabric resulting in the issuance of 8,404 shares of Company common stock valued at $150,000. 

F-44

Item 9. Changes Inin and Disagreements withWith Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On July 17, 2018, we dismissed AMC Auditing as our independent registered public accounting firm and appointed MaloneBailey, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. The engagement of MaloneBailey, LLP was approved by our Board of Directors.None.

On July 18, 2018, we filed a Form 8-K announcing the change in auditors and that filing is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and ProceduresEVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As required by Rule 13a-15 underIn connection with the Securities Exchange Actpreparation of 1934, we have carried outthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management conducted an evaluationassessment of the effectiveness of our disclosureinternal controls and proceduresover financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report being September 30, 2018. This evaluation was carried out under(under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer(“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(“CFO”). Based uponon that evaluation, includingassessment, our Chief Executive OfficerCEO and Chief Financial Officer, weCFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were ineffectivenot effective due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as described below. Management’s assessment of the endeffectiveness of the period covered by this annual report.our disclosure controls and procedures is expressed at a level of reasonable assurance because management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial ReportingMANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, (asas defined in Rule 13a-15(f) underand 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange ActAct. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 1934). Management hasfinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (2) provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. No evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

Under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2018 based on2021, using the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issuedset forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a resultCommission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). We excluded from our assessment the internal control over financial reporting of this assessment, management concluded that,ATL Data Centers LLC and Solar Watt Solutions, Inc. with total assets of $267.3 million (of which $27.3 million represents goodwill and intangibles included within the scope of the assessment), and total revenues of $43.2 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended September 30, 2018,2021.As part of our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was not effective. Ouras of September 30, 2021, management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal controlweaknesses: (1) the Company did not adequately implement or properly maintain controls over its financial close and reporting which are indicativeprocess, its process over the recording of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of dutiesenergy and effective risk assessment;other services revenue and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures forits process over the accounting and financial reporting with respectvaluation of certain aspects of business combinations involving significant estimates and (2) the Company did not adequately design and maintain effective general information technology controls over third-party information systems and applications that are relevant to the requirements and applicationpreparation of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.the Company’s financial statements:

 

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our internal control over financial reporting. During the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2019: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting.

·Financial Close and Reporting: Controls over financial statement reviews, specific to the appropriate reconciliation of certain balance sheet accounts, were not operating effectively.
oRecording of Revenues for certain non-principal revenue generating subsidiaries: Controls over the recording and processing of revenue for certain non-principal revenue generating entities, specifically, p2kLabs, Inc, GridFabric, LLC and CleanSpark, LLC, lack the level of precision necessary to ensure the completeness and accuracy of revenue recorded.

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers set forth in Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Remediation of Material Weakness

oBusiness Combinations: Controls designed to properly consider and evaluate certain aspects of our business combinations and related reporting units did not operate effectively to identify all necessary adjustments made to the purchase price during the valuation process and the related goodwill balances recorded. This includes controls around business combination accounting, specifically as it relates to the valuation of contingent consideration as part of the purchase price underlying the business combinations, as well as the identification of reporting units.

  

 2943 
Table of Contents 

·Information and Technology Controls: Certain individual control deficiencies related to information technology (“IT”) general controls and report reviews aggregate into a material weakness, as follows:

We are unable to remedy our controls related to the inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management until we receive financing to hire additional employees. We are currently in the process of hiring an outsourced service provider to improve the controls for accounting and financial reporting.

oCertain process-level and IT-dependent controls over user access to IT programs and applications, specifically utilized for hosting services and file storage, were not effective.

oControls relating to the evaluation of service organization controls reports were not performed over certain third-party service providers to cover the entire fiscal year.

   

ChangesA material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, duringsuch that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis

These material weaknesses did not result in any identified material misstatements to the financial statements, and there were no changes to previously released financial results. Based on these material weaknesses, management concluded that at September 30, 2021, internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, MaloneBailey, LLP has issued an adverse audit report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2021, which appears on page F-2.

Following identification of the material weaknesses and prior to filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we completed substantive procedures for the year ended September 30, 20182021. Based on these procedures, management believes that our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our CEO and CFO has certified that, based on their knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-K, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of CleanSpark as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-K. MaloneBailey, LLP has issued an unqualified opinion on our financial statements, which appears on page F-1.

REMEDIATION

Management has been implementing and continues to implement measures designed to ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated, such that these controls are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. The remediation actions include the following:

·additional qualified staff were appointed during the year-ended September 30, 2021 and subsequent to year-end to ensure appropriate reviews occur
·the implementation of additional monitoring of controls to improve documentation of internal control procedures
·expanding the management and governance over IT system controls; and
·implementing enhanced process controls around internal user access management including provisioning, removal, and periodic review

We believe that these actions will remediate the material weaknesses, once management has performed its assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting including the remedial measures described above. The weaknesses will not be considered remediated, however, until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of these material weaknesses will be completed prior to the end of fiscal year 2022.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Except for the material weaknesses identified during the quarter, as of September 30, 2021, and except for the remedial measures described above, there have been no other changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our current directors and executive officers.

NameAgePosition(s)
S. Matthew Schultz49Chief Executive Officer and Director
Zachary K. Bradford32President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Bryan Huber36Chief Operating Officer and Director
Larry McNeill76Chairman and Director

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors.

S. Matthew Schultz,Chief Executive Officer, has been involved in many capacities with several publicly traded companies. Most recently, he served as the President and CEO of Amerigo Energy, Inc., creating multiple syndicated offerings of developmental oil production programs, as well as overseeing the operations from permitting through production.  Since 1999, he has assisted numerous development and early stage companies to secure financing and experience significant growth.  As the President of Wexford Capital Ventures, Inc., he was instrumental in funding companies both domestically and abroad. While serving as the Chairman of Pali Financial Group, Inc., he assisted in market development of dozens of public corporations.  He was a founding member and the Vice President of the Utah Consumer Lending Association.  A native of Lander, WY, he studied management and finance at Weber State University.

 3044 
Table of Contents 

Aside from that provided above, Mr. Schultz does

INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON INTERNAL CONTROLS

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not hold and has not held over the past five yearsprevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any other directorships in any company with a classevaluation of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act oreffectiveness for future periods are subject to the requirementsrisk that controls may become inadequate because of Section 15(d)changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. No evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10 – Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance

Information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 11 – Executive Compensation

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company underCommission within 120 days after the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Mr. Schultz is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his experience and knowledge in public company reporting and financing and work in the energy sector.

Zachary K. Bradford, President and Chief Financial Officer, is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in Nevada and a memberend of the American Institutefiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 12 – Security Ownership of Certified Public Accountants. He has served asCertain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from the managing partner of a public accountingCompany’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and consulting firm in Henderson, Nevada since June 2013. Mr. Bradford holds a B.S. in Accounting and a Masters of Accountancy from Southern Utah University. From March of 2015 to July 31, 2016, Mr. Bradford served as a memberExchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the board of directorsfiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 13 – Certain Relationships and Chief Financial Officer of Epic Stores Corp.Related Transactions, and Director Independence

AsideThe information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from that provided above, Mr. Bradford does not holdthe Company’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and has not held overExchange Commission within 120 days after the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Item 14 – Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Act or subject toCommission within 120 days after the requirements of Section 15(d)end of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.

Mr. Bradford is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his experience and knowledge in public company reporting and accounting.

Bryan Huber, Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Huber has over 13 years of experience in the design-build construction and energy industries. He has extensive experience and specialization with sustainable energy design and implementation, sustainable building design and construction, energy efficiency program design and development, renewable energy design and integration, project management, quality assurance, and project commissioning. In addition, Bryan brings with him a core competency within renewable energy Independent Power Producer deal structuring, design, forecasting, financial modeling, incentive monetization, project financing, and deployment. As a Co-Founder of CleanSpark, Bryan continues to be integrally involved in technology development management, refinement, implementation, and operation of CleanSpark’s Energy Operating Platform.

Bryan holds a B.S. in Construction Engineering & Management from Purdue University’s School of Civil Engineering, has completed Master’s coursework in Architecture focusing on integration of Distributed Energy Resource Systems into the built environment, and is a LEED Accredited Professional through the United States Green Building Council.

Aside from that provided above, Mr. Huber does not hold and has not held over the past five years any other directorships in any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Mr. Huber is qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his experience and knowledge in the renewable energy industry.

Larry McNeill, Chairman and Director, has a master’s degree in Business Administration from Armstrong University, a BA in Business Administration, Economics, and Russian language from Minnesota State University, and has completed the course work towards his PhD in Business Management.

Larry has a diverse business background that includes a range of broad business skills gained from his many roles in Real Estate, Finance, Research, Legal, Management, and Business Strategies. These roles include serving as the Director of Safeway Grocery Stores, Inc's Consumer, Sales, and Store Location research departments where he was responsible for the expansion of Safeway in Europe, Australia and Canada. The Director of Market Research for A&P where he was responsible for the Company's expansion into Saudi Arabia. An Executive Officer of Smiths Food and Drug Centers for 17 years; most recently as the Senior Vice President of Corporate Development overseeing the Research, Real Estate, and Legal Departments. Mr. McNeill retired from Smith’s Food & Drug Stores in 1996 after the Fred Meyer merger was completed.

 3145 
Table of Contents 

Aside from that provided above, Mr. McNeill doesPART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

1.      Financial Statements. The consolidated financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-2.

2.      Financial Statement Schedules. Schedules are not hold and hassubmitted because they are not held overapplicable or not required under Regulation S-X or because the past five years any other directorshipsrequired information is included in any company with a class of securities registered pursuantthe financial statements or notes thereto.

3.      Exhibits required to Section 12 of the Exchange Act or subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act or any company registered as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Mr. McNeill s qualified to serve on our Board of Directors because of his experience and knowledge in business management and financing.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (1) any bankruptcy petitionbe filed by or against any businessItem 601 of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either atRegulation S-K. The information called for by this Item is incorporated by reference from the time of the bankruptcy or within two years priorIndex to that time; (2) any convictionExhibits included in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 Exhibit NumberExhibit DescriptionFormFile No.Exhibit Filing DateFiling DateFiled Herewith
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and Pioneer Critical Power, Inc., dated January 22, 20198-K000-534982.1January 24, 2019 
2.2Stock Purchase Agreement by and between p2klabs, Inc., Amer Tadayon and the Company, dated January 31, 20208-K001-391872.1February 6, 2020 
2.3 †Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 9, 2020, by and among CleanSpark, Inc., ATL Data Centers LLC, CLSK Merger Sub, LLC and the Sellers8-K001-391872.1December 10, 2020 
3.1Articles of Incorporation, dated October 9, 198710-12G000-534983.1November 17, 2008 
3.2Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 9, 198710-12G000-534983.1ANovember 17, 2008 
3.3Bylaws, dated October 15, 198710-12G000-534983.2November 17, 2008 
3.4Amended Bylaws, dated February 5, 20138-K000-534983.1February 12, 2013 
3.5Certificate of Change, dated February 26, 20138-K000-534983.1February 26, 2013 
3.6Article of Merger, dated November 14, 20218-K000-534983.1December 1, 2014 
3.7Certificate of Amendment, dated April 15, 20158-K000-534983.1April 16, 2015 

Committees of the Board

Our company currently does not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor does our company have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our directors believe that it is not necessary to have such committees, at this time, because the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the board of directors.

Our company does not have any defined policy or procedural requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. The board of directors believes that, given the stage of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations develop to a more advanced level. Our company does not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to the board of directors and we do not have any specific process or procedure for evaluating such nominees. The board of directors will assess all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and make recommendations for election or appointment.

A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request addressed to the Chairman of our Board of Directors, Larry McNeill, at the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

 3246 
Table of Contents 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of the Company’s knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended September 30, 2018, the following persons have not filed on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended September 30, 2018:

Name and principal position  Number of late reports   Transactions not timely reported   Known failures to file a required form
S. Matthew Schultz, CEO  0   1   0
Zachary Bradford, President and CFO  0   0   0
Bryan Huber, COO and Director  1   1   0
Larry McNeill, Chairman and Director  0   1   0

3.8Certificate of Designation, dated April 15, 20158-K000-534983.2April 16, 2015 
3.9Certificate of Change, dated May 6, 20158-K000-534983.1May 13, 2015 
3.10Article of Merger, dated October 31, 20168-K000-534983.1November 14, 2016 
3.11Certificate of Designation, dated April 16, 20198-K000-534983.1April 18, 2019 
3.12Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated August 9, 2019DEF 14C000-53498Appendix AJuly 12, 2019 
3.13Amendment to Certificate of Designation, dated October 9, 20198-K000-534983.1October 9, 2019 
3.14Certificate of Change, dated December 4, 20198-K000-534983.1December 10, 2019 
3.15Certificate of Withdrawal of Series B Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation, dated March 10, 20208-K001-391873.1March 10, 2020 
3.16Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of CleanSpark, Inc., dated October 2, 2020DEF 14C000-53498Appendix AJuly 28, 2020 
3.17Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of CleanSpark, Inc., dated March 16, 2021.8-K001-391873.1March 18, 2021 
3.18First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of CleanSpark, Inc., dated September 17, 20218-K001-391873.1September 17, 2021 
3.19First Amended and Restated Bylaws of CleanSpark, Inc., 2017 Incentive Plan, dated September 17, 20218-K001-391873.2September 17, 2021 
4.1Form of Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture, dated December 31, 2018 issued to the Investor8-K000-534984.1December 31, 2018 
4.2Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 31, 2018, issued to the Investor8-K000-534984.2December 31, 2018 
4.3Form of Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Promissory Note, dated April 17, 2019, issued to the Investor8-K000-534984.1April 18, 2019 

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller. We will provide, at no cost, a copy of the Code of Ethics to any shareholder upon receiving a written request sent to the Company’s address shown on Page 1 of this report.

Item 11. Executive Compensation


The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and 2018.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal positionYearSalary ($)

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings ($)

All Other

Compensation

($)

Total

($)

S. Matthew Schultz

CEO

2017

2018

-

-

-

2,527

-

-

-

-

-

-

25,673

123,114

168,052

68,886

193,725

194,527

Zachary Bradford

CFO

2017

2018

 

-

-

 

-

2,527

 

-

-

 

-

-

-

-

26,360

87,746

 

167,365

104,254

 

193,725

194,527

 

Bryan

Huber

COO

2017

2018

 

-

-

-

52,527

 

-

-

-

951,797

-

-

6,288

19,604

 

110,023

108,481

 

116,311

1,132,409

 


Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

Matthew Schultz- Chief Executive Officer and Director

The Company has a consulting agreement with Matthew Schultz, our Chief Executive Officer, for management services. In accordance with this agreement, as amended, Mr. Schultz provides services to us in exchange for $15,000 in compensation for services plus a $1,000 medical insurance stipend, each month plus a bonus of 0.5% of gross

 3347 
Table of Contents 

4.4Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated December 31, 2018, issued to the Investor8-K000-534984.2April 18, 2019 
10.1+CleanSpark, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive PlanS-8333-21883110.12June 19, 2017 
10.2Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 31, 2018, between CleanSpark Inc. and the Investor8-K000-5349810.1December 31, 2018 
10.3Form of IP Security Agreement, dated December 31, 2018, between CleanSpark, Inc. and the Investor8-K000-5349810.2December 31, 2018 
10.4Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement, dated January 22, 20198-K000-5349810.2January 24, 2019 
10.5Indemnity Agreement, dated January 22, 20198-K000-5349810.3January 24, 2019 
10.6Contract Manufacturing Agreement, dated January 22, 20198-K000-5349810.4January 24, 2019 
10.7Form of Purchase Agreement, dated April 17, 2019, between the Company and the Investor8-K000-5349810.1April 18, 2019 
10.8IP Security Agreement dated April 17, 20198-K000-5349810.3April 18, 2019 
10.9†Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of November 5, 20198-K000-5349810.1November 12, 2019 
10.10Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 6, 20198-K000-5349810.2November 12, 2019 
10.11Escrow Agreement, dated January 31, 20208-K001-3918710.1February 6, 2020 
10.12Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated as of March 10, 20208-K001-3918710.1March 10, 2020 
10.13Second Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated as of March 13, 20208-K001-3918710.1March 16, 2020 
10.14Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of April 6, 202010-Q001-3918710.1August 4, 2020 
10.15Third Amendment to Transaction Documents, dated as of May 1, 20208-K001-3918710.1May 6, 2020 
10.16Promissory Note, dated as of May 7, 20208-K001-3918710.1May 20, 2020 
10.17+First Amendment to CleanSpark, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan, dated as of October 7, 2020DEF 14C000-53498Appendix BJuly 28, 2020 

revenue. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Mr. Schultz for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. During the year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, Mr. Schultz earned $194,527 and $193,425, respectively, in accordance with this agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Schultz allowed the Company to defer $123,114 as accrued compensation. The Company owed Mr. Schultz $123,796 and $58,810 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expenses as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Deferred compensation is reported under due to related parties.

Zachary Bradford – President, Chief Financial Officer and Director

The Company has a consulting agreement with ZRB Holdings, Inc, an entity wholly owned by Zachary Bradford, our Chief Financial Officer and director, for management services. In accordance with this agreement, as amended, Mr. Bradford provides services to us in exchange for $15,000 in compensation for services plus a $1,000 medical insurance stipend, each month plus a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Mr. Bradford for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. During the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, Mr. Bradford earned $194,527 and $193,425, respectively, in accordance with this agreement. During the year ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Bradford allowed the Company to defer $87,746 as accrued compensation. The Company owed Mr. Bradford $89,351and $78,252 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expenses as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Deferred compensation is reported under due to related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.

Bryan Huber – Chief operations Officer and Director

The Company has a consulting agreement with Bryan Huber, our Chief Operations Officer and director, for management services. In accordance with the original agreement, Mr. Huber provided services to us in exchange for $117,000 in compensation for services plus a $500 medical insurance stipend and a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. On August 28, 2018, the Company replaced the original agreement with an agreement with Zero Positive, LLC an entity controlled by Mr. Huber. In accordance with this agreement with Zero Positive, LLC, Mr. Huber agrees to provide services through to the Company in exchange for $160,000 in annual compensation plus a $500 medical insurance stipend and a bonus of 0.5% of gross revenue. Under the agreement Mr. Huber was also granted a one-time bonus of $50,000, payment of which will be deferred until the Company completes a qualified financing that exceeds three-million dollars or average monthly revenues of the Company exceed one-million dollars for three months. The Company has also agreed to reimburse Zero Positive, LLC for expenses incurred. The term of the agreement is one year and automatically renews until cancelled by either party. During the year ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, Mr. Huber and Zero positive earned $180,612 and $116,377, respectively, in accordance with this agreement. During the years ended September 30, 2018, Mr. Huber allowed the Company to defer $69,604 as accrued compensation. The Company owed Mr. Huber $73,625 and $6,288 in deferred compensation and reimbursable expenses as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Deferred compensation is reported under due to related parties.

On September 28, 2018, in connection with the Consulting agreement executed with Zero Positive, LLC Company issued warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.80 per share to an Zero Positive. The warrants were valued at $2,607,096 using the Black Scholes option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 10 years, risk free interest rate of 3.05%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rate of 191%. The warrants vest as follows: 300,000 vested immediately, the balance vest evenly on the last day of each month over the forty-two months beginning August 31, 2018. As of September 30, 2018, 328,571 warrants had vested, and the Company recorded an expense of $951,797 during the year ended September 30, 2018.

Other than disclosed above there are no formal agreements to compensate any officers for their services. Our officers and directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred on our behalf. However, our officers and directors have received benefits in the form of shares of our common stock and warrants.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

On June 9, 2017, our Board of Directors adopted the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility with us, to provide additional incentive to employees, directors and consultants, and to promote our success. Under the initial Plan, we were able to issue up to an aggregate total of 3,000,000 incentive or non-qualified options to purchase our common stock, or stock awards.

 3448
Table of Contents

10.18Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 20, 20208-K001-3918710.1July 21, 2020 
10.19Exclusive Partner Agreement, by and between the Company and Sunshine Energy Corp., dated August 6, 20208-K001-3918710.1August 7, 2020 
10.20Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2010, by and between the Company, GridFabric, LLC and its sole member, DuPont Hale Holdings, LLC8-K001-3918710.1September 1, 2020 
10.21+Employment Agreement, entered into by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Zachary K. Bradford, dated October 26, 20208-K001-3918710.1October 28, 2020 
10.22+Employment Agreement, entered into by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Lori Love, dated October 26, 20208-K001-3918710.2October 28, 2020 
10.23+Employment Agreement, entered into by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Amanda Kabak, dated October 26, 20208-K001-3918710.3October 28, 2020 
10.24+Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, entered into by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Amer Tadayon, dated October 26, 20208-K001-3918710.4October 28, 2020 
10.25+Employment Agreement, entered into by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and S. Matthew Schultz, dated October 26, 20208-K001-3918710.5October 28, 2020 
10.26†Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 23, 2021, by and among CleanSpark, Inc., CLSK SWS Merger Sub, Inc., Solar Watt Solutions, Inc., and the Sellers.8-K001-3918710.1February 24, 2021 
10.27Non-Fixed Price Sales and Purchase Agreement between CleanSpark, Inc. and Bitmain Technologies Limited, dated April 14, 202110-Q001-3918710.1May 6, 2021 

49 
Table of Contents 

10.28Form of Hardware Purchase & Sales Agreement10-Q001-3918710.2May 6, 2021 
10.29Form of Future Sales Agreement10-Q001-3918710.3May 6, 2021 
10.30Form of Agreement for Sale of Equipment10-Q001-3918710.4May 6, 2021 
10.31+Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Zachary K. Bradford, dated April 16, 202110-Q001-3918710.5May 6, 2021 
10.32+Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Lori Love, dated April 16, 202110-Q001-3918710.6May 6, 2021 
10.33+Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and S. Matthew Schultz, dated April 16, 202110-Q001-3918710.7May 6, 2021 
10.34At the Market Offering Agreement, dated June 3, 2021, between CleanSpark, Inc. and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC8-K001-3918710.1June 3, 2021 
10.35+Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between CleanSpark, Inc. and Amer Tadayon, dated June 9, 20218-K001-3918710.1June 15, 2021 
10.36Lease, by and between ATL Data Centers LLC and Arkhos Property Group Holdings, LLC dated June 5, 202010-Q001-3918710.9August 16, 2021 
10.37†Coinmint Collection Mining Services Agreement, by and between CleanBlok, Inc. and Coinmint, LLC date July 8, 202110-Q001-3918710.11August 16, 2021 
10.38Purchase Agreement, by and between CSRE Properties, LLC and MDRE-Norcross, LLC10-Q001-3918710.12August 16, 2021 
10.39+Second Amendment to CleanSpark, Inc. 2017 Incentive Plan, dated September 17, 20218-K001-3918710.1September 17, 2021 

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of September 30, 2018.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
OPTION AWARDSSTOCK AWARDS
NameNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) ExercisableNumber of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) UnexercisableEquity Incentive  Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)Option Exercise Price  ($)Option Expiration DateNumber of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)

Market Value of Shares or Units

of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)

Equity Incentive  Plan Awards:  Number of Unearned  Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have

 Not Vested (#)

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not  Vested (#)
S. Matthew Schultz---------
Zachary Bradford---------
Bryan Huber328,571571,429-$0.8009/28/2018----

Director Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation of our directors for the year ended September 30, 2018.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
NameFees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)Stock Awards ($)Option Awards ($)Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)All Other Compensation ($)Total ($)
Larry McNeill-------

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth as of January 9, 2019 the number and percentage of the 39,740,596 shares of outstanding common stock which, according to the information supplied to the Company, were beneficially owned by (i) each person who is currently a director of the Company, (ii) each executive officer, (iii) all current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group and (iv) each person who, to the knowledge of the Company, is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock.  Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

 3550 
Table of Contents 

Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the persons named in the table below is c/o CleanSpark, Inc., 70 North Main Street, Ste. 105 Bountiful, Utah 84010.

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of Par Value $0.001 Common Stock Beneficially Owned Percentage of Class
5% or Greater Stockholders      
CleanSpark Holdings, LLC
9666 Businesspark Ave Unit 207
San Diego, CA 92131
  2,782,470  7.0%
Bruce Lybbert
1366 Skyline Dr.
Bountiful, UT 84010
  3,541,691(1)  8.9%
       
Directors and named executive officers      
S. Matthew Schultz  5,709,956(2)  14.4%
Zachary Bradford  3,608,632(3)  9.0%
Larry McNeill  1,880,713(4)  4.7%
Bryan Huber  923,491(5)  2.2%
All Officers and Directors as a Group (4 Persons)  12,122,792  30.3%

 * Less than 1%

10.40†(1)Electrical Services Agreement between CleanBlok, Inc. and Georgia Power Company, dated October 1, 2021Includes 1,541,691 shares of common stock held in his name, 2,000,000 shares of common stock held by Jacque Lybbert, Mr. Lybbert’s spouse.
(2)Includes 4,800,000 shares of common stock held in the S M Schultz IRRV TR to which Mr. Schultz is the beneficial owner, 500,000 shares of common stock held in his name and 409,956 shares of common stock held by his spouse.
(3)Includes 3,238,632 shares of common stock held in ZRB Holdings Inc. in which Mr. Bradford is the beneficial owner, 120,000 shares of common stock held in BlueChip Advisors LLC in which Mr. Bradford shares beneficial ownership and warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock.
(4)Includes 489,361 shares of common stock held in his name, 716,352 shares of common stock held in his Roth IRA, 175,000 shares held by his son living with him and warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock.
(5)Includes 23,491 shares of common stock held in his name and warrants to purchase 900,000 shares of common stock.

The following table sets forth as of January 9, 2018 the number and percentage of the 1,000,000 shares of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock which, according to the information supplied to the Company, were beneficially owned by (i) each person who is currently a director of the Company, (ii) each executive officer, (iii) all current directors and executive officers of the Company as a group and (iv) each person who, to the knowledge of the Company, is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each of the persons named in the table below is c/o CleanSpark, Inc., 70 North Main Street, Ste. 105 Bountiful, Utah 84010.

36
Table of Contents

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of Par Value $0.001 Series A Preferred Stock Beneficially Owned Percentage of Class
5% or Greater Stockholders       
Bruce Lybbert  250,000   25%
Directors and named executive officers       
S. Matthew Schultz  250,000   25%
Zachary Bradford  250,000   25%
Bryan Huber  —     0%
Larry McNeill  250,000   25%
All Officers and Directors as a Group (5 Persons)  750,000   75%

 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as provided below and in “Executive Compensation” set forth above, for the past two fiscal years there have not been, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a participant in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years($191,742), and in which any director, executive officer, holder of 5% or more of any class of our capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Zach Bradford, President, CFO and Director

On August 13, 2017, the Company executed a 15% promissory note with a face value of $80,000 with Zachary Bradford, its President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the promissory note the Company received $80,000 and agreed to repay the note evenly over 12 months. The Company repaid $73,333 and $6,667 in principal during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company incurred interest expense of $12,000 and $1,800 in interest during the years ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company owed $0 and $73,333 in principal and $600 and $0 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement as of September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eleven 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $189,690 with Zachary Bradford, its President and Chief Financial Officer. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $189,690 and agreed to repay the notes on demand. As of September 30, 2018, Company owed $189,690 in principal and $10,733 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement. On January 3, 2019, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the notes through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding.

Larry McNeil, Chairman and Director

During the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company executed eight 15% promissory notes with a total face value of $163,100 with Larry McNeill, a Director of the Company. Under the terms of the promissory notes the Company received $163,100 and agreed to repay the note on demand. As of September 30, 2018, Company owed $163,100 in principal and $6,562 in accrued interest under the terms of the agreement. On December 31, 2018, the Company settled all remaining obligations under the note through the payment of all outstanding principal and interest then outstanding.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Below is the table of Audit Fees billed by our auditors in connection with the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

Financial Statements for the
Year Ended September 30
 Audit Services Audit Related Fees Tax Fees Other Fees
2018  $45,639  $0  $0  $0 
2017  $36,615  $0  $0  $0 

37
Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

(a)Financial Statements and Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

(b)Exhibits

Exhibit NumberDescriptionX
2.110.41AssetForm of Future Sales and Purchase Agreement dated May 2, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2018.X
2.210.42Amendment to Asset PurchaseLease Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2018.
2.3Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated July 13, 2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2018.
3.1Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2008.
3.2Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2008.
3.3Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10-12G, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2008.
3.4Amended Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2013.
3.5Certificate of Change, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2013.
3.6Articles of Merger, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 2014.
3.7Certificate of Change, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2015.
3.8Certificate of Amendment and Certificate of Designation, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2015.
3.9Certificate of Change, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2015.
3.10Articles of Merger, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2016.
4.1Promissory Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014.
4.2Promissory Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014.
4.3Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 17, 2015.
4.4Convertible Promissory Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2018.
4.5Convertible Promissory Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2018.

38
Table of Contents

4.6Convertible Promissory Note, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2018.
4.7Form of Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture dated December 31, 2018 issued to the Investor, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2018.
4.8Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated December 31, 2018 issued to the Investor , incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2018.
5.1Opinion of the Doney Law Firm regarding the legality of the securities being registered, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.1 in the registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2018.
10.1Debt Settlement Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2014.
10.2Asset and Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 10, 2014.
10.3Debt Settlement Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 6, 2014.
10.4Services Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2014.
10.5Debt Settlement Agreements, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2015.
10.6Consulting Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 19, 2016.
10.7Stock Purchase Agreement and Assignment, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 2.1 and 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016.
10.8Agreement for Secretary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2016.
10.9Asset Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2016.
10.10Amendment No. 1 to Asset Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2016.
10.11Amendment No. 2 to Asset Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 22, 2016.
10.12Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2018.
10.13Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2018.
10.14Amended Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2018.
10.15Securities Purchase Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 2018.
10.16Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 31, 2018 between CleanSpark, Inc. and the Investor incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2018.ANC Corporate Center & Paseo Verde, LLC, dated August 26, 2021X
10.1721.1FormList of IP Security Agreement dated December 31, 2018 between CleanSpark, Inc. and the Investor incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 31, 2018.SubsidiariesX
23.1Consent of MaloneBaileyX
23.231.1Consent of AMC Auditing
99.1Financial Statements and Pro Formas, incorporated by reference to Exhibits 99.2-99.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 2016.
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
101**101 INS*The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018 Inline XBLR Instance Document
101 SCH*

Inline XBLR Taxonomy Extension

Schema Document

101 CAL*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension

Calculation Linkbase Document

101 LAB*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label

Linkbase Document

101 PRE*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension

Presentation Linkbase Document

101 DEF*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension

Definition Linkbase Document

104*

Cover Page Interactive Data File

(formatted as Inline XBRL and contained

in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL).Exhibit 101 attachments)

* These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section

1350, and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

** The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

+ Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

†Portions of this exhibit have been redacted in compliance with Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K.

 3951 
Table of Contents 

SIGNATURES

In accordance withSIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CleanSpark Inc.CLEANSPARK, INC.

By:/s/ S. Matthew SchultzZachary Bradford

S. Matthew SchultzZachary Bradford

Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

By:/s/ Zachary BradfordLori Love

Zachary BradfordLori Love

President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director 

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d)Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

By:/s/ S. Matthew SchultzZachary Bradford

S. Matthew SchultzZachary Bradford

Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Director

December 14, 2021
 

January 15, 2019

By:/s/ Zachary BradfordLori Love

Zachary BradfordLori Love

President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

By:/s/ S. Matthew Schultz

S. Matthew Schultz

Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board

December 14, 2021

By:/s/ Larry McNeill

Larry McNeill

Chairman and Director 

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

By:/s/ Bryan HuberRoger Beynon

Bryan HuberRoger Beynon

Chief Operations Officer and Director 

January 15, 2019December 14, 2021

By:/s/ Dr. Thomas Wood

Dr. Thomas Wood

Director

December 14,2021

 4052