UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 ____________________________________________________________
FORM 10-K
 ____________________________________________________________
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the year ended September 27, 2019October 1, 2021
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to
Commission File Number 001-37860
 ____________________________________________________________
vrex-20211001_g1.jpg
VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware81-3434516
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
1678 S. Pioneer Road,Salt Lake City, UtahUtah84104
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(801)972-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 ____________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common StockVREXThe Nasdaq Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).     Yes  ý     No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth


company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large Accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-Accelerated filer☐  Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.     
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes    No  

As of March 29, 2019,April 2, 2021, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of shares of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price of such shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on March 29, 2019)April 2, 2021) was approximately $1,160.4$584.8 million. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by the registrant’s executive officers and directors and by each entity that owned 10% or more of the registrant’s outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of November 18, 2019,8, 2021, there were 38,494,34939.5 million shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of registrant’s proxy statement relating to registrant’s 20202022 annual meeting of stockholders have been incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.






VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
INDEX




1

Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Annual Report”), including the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (“MD&A”) contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which provides a safe harbor"safe harbor" for statements about future events, products and financial performance that are based on the beliefs of, estimates made by, and information currently available to the management of Varex Imaging Corporation (“we,” “our,” “us,” the “Company,” “Varex,” or “Varex Imaging”). Actual results and the outcome or timing of certain events described in these forward-looking statements are subject to risk and uncertainties and may differ significantly from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ significantly from those projections or expectations include, among other things, the following:
reductionrisks described in or lossthe Summary of business to key customers;
changes in, or our inability to predictPrincipal Risk Factors below and meet, demand for our products;
loss of business to, and inability to compete with, competitors;
changes in macroeconomic and global geopolitical factors, including changes in regulatory regimes, import and export controls and restrictions (such as tariffs) and global or regional economic stability;
our ability to meet the payment and other requirements of our existing bank debt and other contractual obligations;
our ability to develop new products and enhance existing products;
the ability to identify and remediate significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal controls;
disruption at our manufacturing facilities and fluctuations in manufacturing costs;
changes in our effective tax rate;
our inability to source components and raw materials of our products
disruption or breach of our critical information technology systems;
the results of any product liability or product defect claims, product recalls and other litigation and regulatory investigations;
risks related to intellectual property;
our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel;
the impact of natural and other disasters, power loss, strikes and other events beyond our control; and
other factors citedfurther described in the Risk Factors listed under Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report, MD&A and other factors described from time to time in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), or other reasons.
Statements concerningconcerning: supply chain and logistic challenges; cost increases; the impact of the ongoing coronavirus ("COVID-19") pandemic on the global economy or the Company; industry or market segment outlook; market acceptance of or transition to new products or technology such as advanced X-ray tube and digital flat panel detector products; growth drivers; future orders, revenues, backlog, earnings or other financial results; and any statements using the terms “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “can,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “estimate,” “may,” “intended,” “potential,” and “possible” or similar statements are forward-looking statements.statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results and the outcome and timing of certain events to differ materially from those projected or management’s current expectations.
Any forward-looking statement made in this Annual Report (including in any exhibits or documents incorporated by reference) is based only on information currently available to Varex and its management and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We have not assumed any obligation to, and you should not expect us to, update or revise those statements because of new information, future events or otherwise.

Summary of Principal Risk Factors
    Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” beginning on page 14 of this Annual Report for a discussion of the following principal risks and other risks that make an investment in Varex speculative or risky:

Supply chain and logistic challenges and disruptions, including increased difficulty in obtaining supplies of important components, and increasing costs have impacted our ability to manufacture products, have caused product delivery delays, and have increased our manufacturing costs. These challenges and disruptions are likely to continue throughout our 2022 fiscal year.
It has become more difficult to attract and retain employees, which has impacted, and is likely to continue to impact, our ability to manufacture products.
We sell products and services to a limited number of original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) customers, many of which are also competitors, and a reduction in or loss of business of one or more of these customers may materially reduce our sales.
We may not be able to accurately predict customer demand for our products, which is subject to matters beyond our control.
We compete in highly competitive markets, and we may lose business to our customers or other companies with greater resources or the ability to develop more effective technologies, or we could be forced to reduce our prices.
Our success depends on the successful development, introduction, and commercialization of new generations of products and enhancements to or simplifications of existing product lines.
Changes in import/export regulatory regimes and tariffs could continue to negatively impact our business.
A disruption at our manufacturing facilities, as well as fluctuating manufacturing costs, could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our operations, cash flow, and financial position, and the demand for our security, industrial and inspection products, have been adversely impacted, and in the future could continue to be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic disruptions.
Our international manufacturing operations subject us to volatility and other risks, including high security risks, which could result in harm to our employees and contractors or substantial costs.
Warranty claims may materially and adversely affect our business.
Product defects or misuse may result in material product liability or professional errors and omissions claims, litigation, investigation by regulatory authorities, or product recalls that could harm our future revenues and require us to pay material uninsured claims.
2

Our competitive position would be harmed if we are not able to maintain our intellectual property rights and protecting our intellectual property can be costly.
Disruption of critical information systems or material breaches in the security of our systems may materially and adversely affect our business and customer relations.
Compliance with laws and regulations across the globe applicable to the marketing, manufacture, and distribution of our products may be costly, and failure to comply may result in significant penalties and other harm to our business.
Conversion of our Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interest of Varex’s stockholders or may otherwise depress the market price of Varex’s common stock.
We have significant debt obligations that could adversely affect our business, profitability and ability to meet our obligations.
Our Asset-based Loan Credit Facility and our indentures impose significant operating and financial restrictions that may limit current and future operating flexibility, and make it difficult to respond to economic or industry changes or to take certain actions, which could harm our long-term interest.
Potential indemnification liabilities to Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company ("Varian"), could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.


PART I

Item 1. Business
Overview

Varex Imaging Corporation is a leading innovator, designer and manufacturer of X-ray imaging components including X-ray tubes, digital detectors, linear accelerators and other image software processing solutions, which are keycritical components in a variety of X-ray based imaging systems.equipment. Our components are used in medical diagnostic imaging, security inspection systems, and industrial quality inspection systems, as well as for analysis and measurement applications in industrial and security imagingmanufacturing applications. Global original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”)OEMs incorporate our X‑rayX-ray imaging components in their systems to detect, diagnose, protect and inspect. As of September 27, 2019, we hadVarex has approximately 2,0002,100 full-time equivalents employees, located at engineering, manufacturing and service center sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. For more information about us, visit vareximaging.com.

Founded as a Delaware corporation in July 2016, Varex was established as an independent publicly-traded company in January 2017 as a result of its spin-off from Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian”). We expanded our business in May 2017, when we acquired the medical imaging business (“Acquired Detector Business”) of PerkinElmer, Inc. (PKI”) for $273.3 million. In the transaction, we acquired PerkinElmer Medical Holdings, Inc. and Dexela Limited, together with certain assets of PKI and its direct and indirect subsidiaries relating to digital detectors that serve as components for medical and industrial X-ray imaging systems. In

April 2019, we acquired Direct Conversion AB, a manufacturer and marketer of linear array digital detectors utilizing direct conversion and photon counting technology.

Our products are sold worldwide in three geographic regions: the Americas, EMEA, and APAC. The Americas includes North America (primarily the United States) and LatinSouth America. EMEA includes Europe, Russia, the Middle East, India and Africa. APAC includes Asia (other than India) and Australia. Revenues by region are based on the known final destination of products being sold.

Our success depends, among other things, on our ability to anticipate and respond to changes in our markets, the direction of technological innovation and the demands ofdemand from our customers. We continue tocontinually invest in research and development and employ overapproximately 500 engineers. Combining thisindividuals in product development related activities. Our focus on innovation and product performance along with strong and long-term customer relationships allows us to partnercollaborate with our customers to bring industry-leading products to the X-ray imaging market. We continue to work to improve the life and quality of our imaging components and leverage our scale as one of the largest independent X-ray imaging component suppliersuppliers to provide cost-effective solutions for our customers. Demand for our products can also be impacted by geo-political factors, including tariffs on key imported materials used in manufacturing our products and also on X-ray imaging products we sell to customers outside the United States. The escalation of trade conflicts between the United States and China has negatively impacted our business and are expected to continue.

Operating Segments and Products

Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), evaluates our product groupings and measures our business performance in    We have two reportable operating segments: Medical and Industrial. The segments align our products and service offerings with customer use in medical and industrial markets and are consistent with how the CODM evaluates the business for the allocation of resources. The CODM allocates resources to and evaluates the financial performance of each operating segment primarily based on revenues and gross margin.markets.
Medical

In our Medical business segment, we design, manufacture, sell and service X-ray imaging components, for use in a range of radiographic or fluoroscopic imaging applications including computed tomography (“CT”), mammography, oncology, cardiac, surgery, dental, and computer-aided detection. We provide a broad range of X-ray imaging components for Medical customers, including X-ray tubes, digital detectors, high voltage connectors, image-processing software and workstations, 3D reconstruction software, computer-aided diagnostic software, collimators, automatic exposure control devices, generators, heat exchangers, ionization chambers and buckys.

A significant portion of our revenues come from the sales of high-end X-ray tubes These components are used in a range of medical imaging applications including CT, imagingmammography, oncology, cardiac, surgery, dental, and high-end dynamic digital detectors used in fluoroscopic and 3D dental imaging applications. These upper-tier imaging components are characterized by increased levels of technological complexity, engineering and intellectual property that typically allow these products to have a higher sales price and gross margin.other diagnostic radiography uses.

The digital detector market continues to mature from initial product introductions that were made approximately 15 years ago. For the past few years, we have experienced price erosion for these products, predominantly in the highly-competitive market for radiographic detectors. We anticipate this trend will continue in the foreseeable future.

Our X-ray imaging components are primarily sold to OEM customers. These OEM customers that incorporatethen design-in our products into their X-ray imaging systems for a variety of medical modalitiesmodalities. A substantial majority of medical X-ray imaging OEMs globally are our customers, and industrial applications. To a much lesser extent,many of these have been our customers for over 25 years. We believe one of the reasons for customer loyalty is that our hardware and software products are tightly integrated with our customers' systems. We work very closely with our customers to create custom built components for their systems based on technology platforms that we have developed. Because our products are often customized for our customers' specific equipment, it can be costly and complex for our customers to switch to another provider.
3

Once our components are designed into our customers' equipment, our customers will typically continue to buy from us for any replacement components and for service and support for that equipment. Some of our products are also included in product registrations for our customers' equipment that require regulatory approval to change. In addition to sales to OEM customers, we sell our X-ray imaging componentsproducts to independent service companies and distributors andas well as directly to end-users for replacement purposes.

    We are one of the largest global manufacturers of X-ray components and each year we produce over 27,000 X-ray tubes and 20,000 X-ray detectors. We estimate that our world-wide installed base of products includes more than 150,000 X-ray tubes, 150,000 X-ray detectors, 300,000 connect and control components and 15,000 software instances. Replacement and service of our existing installed base makes up a significant portion of our revenue. Many of our components need to be replaced regularly depending upon usage and other factors. For example, CT X-ray tubes generally need to be replaced every 2 to 4 years. In China, the replacement cycle for CT X-ray tubes can be as frequent as every 6 to 12 months due to high utilization of imaging equipment. Other products such as X-ray detectors have a useful life of as much as 7 years or more, but can require more frequent service and repairs during their useful life. In addition, our detector customers often elect to upgrade products to newer technology before the end of a current product’s useful life. X-ray imaging software is a relatively small part of our business and includes maintenance revenue for software licenses.
    The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant effect on hospitals, clinics and outpatient imaging centers as they encountered declines in elective procedures volume. As a result, they reduced the capital purchases of imaging equipment from OEMs, which led to lower demand for X-ray imaging components for us. Additionally, equipment installations were delayed, due to reduced access to healthcare institutions. Partially offsetting this was an increased demand for imaging equipment used to diagnose respiratory diseases, such as radiographic X-ray imaging systems and CT imaging systems. The Company has experienced growth in demand for its products as health systems globally have continued to address healthcare services gaps. However, the Company is not able to convert all the demand into sales due to on-going supply chain related interruptions and uncertainties, particularly with the availability of semiconductor and other electronic components. As a result, uncertainty in overall sales volume is expected to continue into calendar year 2022.
In China, the government is broadening the availability of healthcare services throughout the country.services. As a result, the number of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems, including CT, has grown significantly. We are developing CT X-ray tubes and related subsystems for Chinese OEMs as they introduce new CT imaging systems in China. Over the long-term, we anticipate that China-based revenues will increaseour objective is to become the partner of choice both for OEMs and in the replacement market as CT systems become more widely adopted throughout the Chinese market. In China, despite a percentageCOVID-19 related slowdown in the beginning of the year, demand for our revenues. Forproducts has returned, and full fiscal year 2019, revenues from X-ray imaging components shipped to China-based OEMs and distributors declined to approximately 8% of total company revenues from 10% in the prior year. This decrease reflects a tariff-related decline in sales of radiographic digital detectors2021 results for China exceeded our pre-pandemic expectations.
    In recent years our business in China as well as lower non-OEM aftermarket sales, whichhas been impacted by the trade war with the United States in three principal ways: (1) imports of raw materials from China to the U.S. have become more than offset an increase in salesexpensive, (2) imports of CT tubesraw materials and sub-assemblies from the U.S. to OEM customers.

ToChina have become more expensive, and (3) importing finished U.S. manufactured products into China have become more difficult and expensive. In order to mitigate the impact of the trade war between the United States andtariffs on materials imported from China, we have implemented changes to secure more non-China sources of supply of parts and materials used to manufacture our X-ray imaging products,products. With respect to imports into China, the additional tariffs imposed by the Chinese government have led to a decrease in sales of radiographic detector manufactured in the U.S. To help address these issues, and in September 2019,to be closer to our global customer base, we received from the United States Trade Representative a temporary exclusion from Section 301 tariffs on certain parts and components

imported from China into the United States. We continue to expand manufacturing capabilities at our facilities in China, Germany and the Philippines. We have also implemented local sourcing strategies to offer local content. This local-for-local strategy has been well received by both our local customers as well as global OEMs, and acts as a natural hedge against trade wars and other potential supply chain disruptions.
Industrial

In our Industrial business segment, we design, develop, manufacture, sell and service X-ray imaging products for use in a number of markets, including security applications such asfor cargo screening at ports and borders, and baggage screening at airports, and nondestructive testing and inspection applications used in a number of other markets. Our industrialIndustrial products include Linatron® X-ray linear accelerators, X-ray tubes, digital detectors and high voltage connectors. In addition, we providelicense proprietary image-processing and detection software designed to work with these other Varex products to provide packagepackaged sub-assembly solutions to our Industrial customers. Our Industrial business benefits from the research and development investment and manufacturing economies of scale on the Medical side of our business, as we continue to find new applications for our technology. Along with more favorable pricing dynamics, this allows us to generally achieve higher gross profit for industrial products relative to our Medical business. In addition, our Industrial business benefits from our long-term service agreements for our Linatron® products.

The security market primarily consists of airport security for carry-on baggage, checked baggage and palletized cargo, as well as cargo security for the screening of trucks, trains, and cargo containers at ports and borders.borders as well as airport security for carry-on baggage, checked baggage and palletized cargo. The end customers for border
4

protection systems are typically government agencies, many of which are in oil-based economies and war zones where there has beencan be significant year over year variation in buying patterns.

The non-destructive    Non-destructive testing market utilizesand inspection markets utilize X-ray imaging to scan items for inspection of manufacturing defects and product integrity in a wide range of industries including the aerospace, automotive, electronics, oil and gas, food packaging, metal castings and 3D printing industries. We provide X-ray sources, digital detectors, high voltage connectors and image processing software to OEM customers, system integrators and manufacturers. In addition, new applications for X-ray sources are being developed, such as sterilization of food and its packaging. We provide X-ray sources, digital detectors, high voltage connectors and image processing software to OEM
customers, system integrators and manufacturers in a variety of these markets. We believe that the nondestructive testing market represents a significant growth opportunity for our business, and we are actively pursuing new potential applications for our products.
    The economic downturn triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the demand for X-ray imaging equipment utilized in the non-destructive testing market as manufacturers focused on cash preservation and reduced spending for capital equipment. During the twelve months ended October 1, 2021, we have continued to see improved conditions in this market. Separately, the unprecedented decrease in passenger air traffic led to a decrease in demand in the security market for carry-on baggage and checked baggage.
Customers

Our customers are primarily large OEMs. Our top five customers, measured by revenue, are Canon Medical Systems Corporation (“Canon”), General Electric Company, Elekta AB, United Imaging Healthcare and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. and Hologic, Inc., which collectively accounted for approximately 38%39% of total revenue in fiscal year 2019.2021. Our largest customer, Canon, accounted for approximately 17%18%, 18%21% and 19%17% of our total revenuesrevenue for fiscal years 2019, 2018,2021, 2020, and 2017,2019, respectively, while our ten largest customers as a group accounted for approximately 51%, 49%52% and 48%51% of our revenue for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The loss of one or more of our top customers would have a material and adverse effect on our business. For more information, see “Risk Factors-Varex sells its products and services to a limited number of OEM customers, many of which are also its competitors, and a reduction in or loss of business of one or more of these customers may materially reduce its sales.”

Competition

The imaging components market is highly competitive. OEMs may choose to develop and manufacture X-ray imaging components in-house or they may choose to out-source to a supplier such as usVarex or other providers of imaging components.our competitors. Our success depends upon our ability to anticipate changes in our markets, the direction of technological innovation and the demands ofdemand from our customers. To remain competitive, we must continue tocontinually invest in research and development focused on innovation, improve product performance and quality, and continue to reduce the cost of our imaging components. Significant capital investment is required forto manufacture imaging component manufacturers.components. We believe we have sufficient manufacturing scale to leverage our high volume to reduce overall costs by spreading fixed costs over more units.

Medical

We often compete with the in-house X-ray tube manufacturing operations of major diagnostic imaging systems companies, which are the primary OEM customers for our Medical products. To effectively compete with these in-house capabilities, we must have a competitive advantage in one or more significant areas, such as innovative technology and greater product performance, better product quality or lower product price. We sell a significant volume of our X-ray tubes to OEM customers that have in-house X‑rayX-ray tube production capability. In addition, we compete with some OEM customers, such as Canon, Philips Healthcare and other companies who sell X-ray tubes to smaller OEMs and other manufacturers, such as Industria Applicazioni Elettroniche S.p.A, as well as emerging X-ray tube manufacturers in China. High capital costs and mastery of complex manufacturing processes that drive production yield and product life are significant characteristics of the X-ray tubes business.

The market for digital detectors is also highly competitive. We sell our digital detectors to a number of OEM customers that incorporate our detectors into their medical diagnostic, oncology, 3D dental and veterinary imaging systems. Our amorphous silicon based digital detector technology, our photon counting technology and our complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor technology

competes with other detector technologies, such as amorphous selenium, charge-coupled devices and variations of amorphous silicon scintillators. We believe that our products provide a competitive advantage due to product quality and performance and lower overalltotal cost of ownership over the product lifecycle costs.lifecycle. In the digital flat panel detector market, we primarily compete against Trixell S.A.S., Canon, Vieworks Co., Ltd., Hamamatsu Corporation, iRay Technology (Shanghai) Limited and Jiangsu CareRay Medical Systems Co., Ltd.

Industrial

In the low-energy market of the Industrial segment, we compete with other OEM suppliers, such as General Electric, Canon,iRay, Teledyne, Nuctech Company Limited (“Nuctech”) and Comet AG. While there are other manufacturers of low-energy X-ray tubes and digital detectors
5

for specialized and niche industrial applications, our products are designed for a broad range of applications in inspection, analysis, and non-destructive testing. In the high-energy market, we compete against technologies from Nuctech, Siemens AG, ETM Electromatic Inc., and Foton Ltd., whose X-ray sources are used in applications that include cargo and container scanning, border security, aerospace applications, castings and pressure vessel inspections.

Customer Services and Support

We generally warranty our products for 12 to 24 months. In certain cases, the warranty also may beis specified by usage metrics such as number of scans. We provide technical advice and consultation to major OEM customers from our U.S. offices in Utah, California, Nevada, South Carolina, New York and Illinois; and internationally in the Philippines, China, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Italy and Japan. Our application specialists and engineers make recommendations to meet the customer’s technical requirements within the customer’s budgetary constraints. We often develop specifications for a unique product that will be designed and manufactured to meet a specific customer’s requirements.

Manufacturing and Supplies

We manufacture our products at facilities located in Salt Lake City, Utah; Santa Clara, California; Las Vegas, Nevada; Liverpool, New York; Franklin Park, Illinois; Dinxperlo and Heerlen,Doetinchem, the Netherlands; Walluf and Bremen, Germany; Espoo, Finland andFinland; Calamba City, Philippines.Philippines; and Wuxi, China. These facilities employ state-of-the-art manufacturing techniques and several have been recognized by the press, governments and trade organizations for their commitment to quality improvement. Each of these manufacturing facilities are certified by International Standards Organization (“ISO”) under ISO 9001 (for industrial products) or ISO 13485 (for medical devices). In addition, we have a regional service centerscenter in North Charleston, South Carolina; Willich, Germany; and Wuxi, China.Germany. The combined medical and industrial manufacturing infrastructure enableenables us to leverage production scale to achieve productivity and low cost advantage as well as research and development synergies.

Manufacturing processes at our various facilities include machining, fabrication, subassembly, system assembly and final testing. We have invested in various automated and semi-automated equipment for the fabrication and machining of the parts and assemblies that we incorporate into our products. We may, from time to time, invest further in such equipment. Our quality assurance program includes various quality control measures from inspection of raw materials, purchased parts and assemblies through in-line inspection. In some cases, we may outsource the manufacturing of sub-assemblies while still performing system design, final assembly and testing in-house. In such cases, we believe outsourcing enables us to reduce or maintain fixed costs and capital expenditures, while also providing the flexibility to increase production capacity. We purchase material and components from various suppliers that are either standard products or customized to our specifications. Some of the components included in our products may be sourced from a limited group of suppliers or from a single source supplier, such as the wave guides for linear accelerators; transistor arrays and cesium iodide coatings for digital detectors and specialized integrated circuits, X-ray tube targets, housings, bearings and various other components. We require certain raw materials, such as copper, nickel, silver, gold, lead, tungsten, iridium, rhenium, molybdenum, rhodium, niobium, zirconium, and various high grades of steel alloy for X-ray tubes and industrial products. Worldwide demand, availability and pricing of these raw materials have been volatile, and we expect that availability and pricing will continue to fluctuate in the future.

In the fourth quarter of 2019, we announced the closure of the remainder of our Santa Clara facility and that we would relocate production to other existing facilities. We expect operations at the Santa Clara facility to cease by the end of December 2020 and all activities related to the closure of the facility to be completed by the end of March 2021.


Research and Development

Innovation and developing products, systems and services based on advanced technology is essential to our ability to compete effectively in the marketplace. We maintain a research and development and engineering staff responsible for product design and engineering.

Research and development are primarily conducted domestically at our facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah; San Jose, and Santa Clara, California; Las Vegas, Nevada; Liverpool, New York; and Franklin Park, Illinois and internationally at our facilities in the Netherlands, UK, Sweden and Germany. Our research and development activities are primarily focused on developing and improving imaging component technology. Current X-ray source development areas include smaller footprint linear accelerators, improvements to tube life and tube stability, reductions of tube noise and tube designs that will enable OEMs to continue to reduce dose delivered, and improve image resolution, cost effectively. Research in digital detector imaging technology is aimed at developing new panel technologies (such as photon counting) with better dose utilization, improved image quality and materials discrimination, lower product costs and new image processing tools for advanced applications.

Industrial products share some of the same base technology competencies and platforms as medical products and our medical and industrial development teams are therefore co-located in Salt Lake City, San Jose, Santa Clara, Dinxperlo,Doetinchem, Danderyd and Walluf. One of our competitive advantages is that some of the foundational technologies and software components developed for medical applications
6

may also be applicable in industrial components, and vice versa. In addition to these product development synergies, we are also able to realize sourcing, production, service center, and logistics synergies across the different products and market sectors.

Product and Other Liabilities

Our business exposes us to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacture, sale, installation, servicing and support of X-ray imaging devices, related software and other devices that contain hazardous material or deliver radiation. Because our products are involved in the intentional delivery of radiation to the human body and other situations where people may come in contact with radiation (for example, when our Industrial products are being used to scan cargo) as well as the detection, planning and treatment of medical problems, the possibility for significant injury or death exists if our products fail to work or are not used properly. We may face substantial liability to patients, our customers and others for damages resulting from the faulty, or allegedly faulty, design, manufacture, installation, servicing, support, testing or interoperability of our products and our customers’ products, or their misuse or failure. We may also be subject to claims for property damages or economic loss related to or resulting from any errors or defects in our products, or the installation, servicing and support of our products. Any accident or mistreatment could subject us to legal costs, litigation, adverse publicity and damage to our reputation, whether or not our products or services were a factor. In addition, if a product we design or manufacture were defective (whether due to design, labeling or manufacturing defects, improper use of the product or other reasons), or found to be so by a regulatory authority, we may be required to correct or recall the product and notify other regulatory authorities. We maintain limited product liability, professional liability and omissions liability insurance coverage.

Government Regulation

U.S. Regulations

Laws governing marketing a medical device. In the United States, as a manufacturer and seller of medical devices and devices emitting radiation or utilizing radioactive by-product material, we and some of our suppliers and distributors are subject to extensive regulation by federal governmental authorities, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), and state and local regulatory agencies, to ensure the devices are safe and effective and comply with laws governing products which emit, produce or control radiation. Similar international regulations apply overseas. These regulations, which include the U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the “FDC Act”) and regulations promulgated by the FDA, govern, among other things, the design, development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, import/export, sale and marketing and disposal of medical devices, post market surveillance and reporting of serious injuries and death, repairs, replacements, recalls and other matters relating to medical devices, radiation emitting devices and devices utilizing radioactive by-product material. State regulations are extensive and vary from state to state. Our X-ray tube products, imaging workstations and flat panel detectors are considered medical devices. Under the FDC Act, each medical device manufacturer must comply with quality system regulations that are strictly enforced by the FDA.

Unless an exception applies, the FDA requires that the manufacturer of a new medical device or a new indication for use of, or other significant change in, existing currently marketed medical device obtain 510(k) pre-market notification clearance before it can

market or sell those products in the United States. The 510(k) clearance process is applicable when the device introduced into commercial distribution is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device. The obtainingObtaining the 510(k) clearance generally takes at least six months from the date an application is filed, but could take significantly longer, and generally requires submitting supporting testing data. After a product receives 510(k) clearance, any modifications or enhancements to a product that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, technology, materials, labeling, packaging, or manufacturing process, may require a new 510(k) clearance. The FDA requires each manufacturer to make this determination in the first instance, but the FDA can review any such decision. If the FDA disagrees with the manufacturer’s decision, it may retroactively require the manufacturer to submit a request for 510(k) pre-market notification clearance and may require the manufacturer to cease marketing and recall the product until 510(k) clearance is obtained. The FDA adopted guidance in September 2019 that we expect will increase the number and frequency of clearances for changes made to legally marketed devices. Most of our products are non-classified or Class I medical devices, which do not require 510(k) clearance.

Quality systems. Our manufacturing operations for medical devices, and those of our third-party manufacturers, are required to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (“QSR”), which addresses a company’s responsibility for product design, testing, and manufacturing quality assurance, and the maintenance of records and documentation. The QSR requires that each manufacturer establish a quality systems program by which the manufacturer monitors the manufacturing process and maintains records that show compliance with FDA regulations and the manufacturer’s written specifications and procedures relating to the devices. QSR compliance is necessary to receive and maintain FDA clearance or approval to market new and existing products. The FDA makes announced and unannounced periodic and ongoing inspections of medical device manufacturers to determine compliance
7

with the QSR. If in connection with these inspections the FDA believes the manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulations and/or procedures, it may issue observations that would necessitate prompt corrective action. If FDA inspection observations are not addressed and/or corrective action is not taken in a timely manner and to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA may issue a warning letter (which would similarly necessitate prompt corrective action) and/or proceed directly to other forms of enforcement action. Failure to respond timely to FDA inspection observations, a warning letter or other notice of noncompliance and to promptly come into compliance could result in the FDA bringing enforcement action against us, which could include the total shutdown of our production facilities, denial of importation rights to the United States for products manufactured in overseas locations and denial of export rights for U.S. products and criminal and civil fines.

The FDA and the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) regulate advertising and promotion of our products to ensure that the claims we make are consistent with our regulatory clearances, that we have adequate and reasonable scientific data to substantiate the claims and that our promotional labeling and advertising is neither false nor misleading. We may not promote or advertise our products for uses not within the scope of our intended use statement in our clearances or approvals or make unsupported safety and effectiveness claims.

It is also important that our products comply with electrical safety and environmental standards, such as those of Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”), the Canadian Standards Association (“CSA”), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (“IEC”). In addition, the manufacture and distribution of medical devices utilizing radioactive material requires a specific radioactive material license. For the United States, manufacture and distribution of these radioactive sources and devices also must be in accordance with a model-specific certificate issued by either the NRC or by an Agreement State. In essentially every country and state, installation and service of these products must be in accordance with a specific radioactive materials license issued by the applicable radiation control agency. Service of these products must be in accordance with a specific radioactive materials license. We are also subject to a variety of additional environmental laws regulating our manufacturing operations and the handling, storage, transport and disposal of hazardous substances, and which impose liability for the cleanup of any contamination from these substances.

Other applicable U.S. regulations. As a participant in the healthcare industry, we are also subject to extensive laws and regulations protecting the privacy and integrity of patient medical information that we receive, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), “fraud and abuse” laws and regulations, including physician self-referral prohibitions, and false claims laws. From time to time, these laws and regulations may be revised or interpreted in ways that could make it more difficult for our customers to conduct their businesses, such as recent proposed revisions to the laws prohibiting physician self-referrals, and such revisions could have an adverse effect on the demand for our products, and therefore our business and results of operations. We also must comply with numerous federal, state and local laws of more general applicability relating to such matters as environmental protection, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, fire hazard control and other matters.

The laws and regulations and their enforcement are constantly undergoing change, and we cannot predict what effect, if any, changes to these laws and regulations may have on our business. For example, national and state laws regulate privacy and may regulate our use of data. Furthermore, HIPAA was amended by the HITECHHealth Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act to provide that business associates who have access

to patient health information provided by hospitals and healthcare providers are now directly subject to HIPAA, including the associated enforcement scheme and inspection requirements.

Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement

The federal and state governments of the United States establish guidelines and pay reimbursements to hospitals and free-standing clinics for diagnostic examinations and therapeutic procedures under Medicare at the federal level and Medicaid at the state level. Private insurers often establish payment levels and policies based on reimbursement rates and guidelines established by the government.

The federal government and Congress review and adjust rates annually, and from time to time consider various Medicare and other healthcare reform proposals that could significantly affect both private and public reimbursement for healthcare services in hospitals and free-standing clinics. In the past, we have seen demand for our customers’ systems (in which our products are incorporated) negatively impacted by the uncertainties surrounding reimbursement rates in the United States. State government reimbursement for services is determined pursuant to each state’s Medicaid plan, which is established by state law and regulations, subject to requirements of federal law and regulations.

Various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the state level, and we are unable to predict which, if any, of these proposals will be enacted. In addition, it is possible that changes in federal health care law and policy could result in additional proposals and/or changes to health care system legislation which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Uncertainty
8

created by healthcare reform complicates our customers’ decision-making process and, therefore, impacts our business, and may continue to do so.

The sale of medical devices, the referral of patients for diagnostic examinations and treatments utilizing such devices, and the submission of claims to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) seeking reimbursement for such services, are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare “fraud and abuse.” Anti-kickback laws make it illegal to solicit, induce, offer, receive or pay any remuneration in exchange for the referral of business, including the purchase of medical devices from a particular manufacturer or the referral of patients to a particular supplier of diagnostic services utilizing such devices. False claims laws prohibit anyone from knowingly and willfully presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) that are false or fraudulent, for services not provided as claimed, or for medically unnecessary services. The Office of the Inspector General prosecutes violations of fraud and abuse laws and any violation may result in criminal and/or civil sanctions, including, in some instances, imprisonment and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, which may negatively impact the demand for our products.

Foreign Regulations
Our operations, sales and service of our products outside the United States are subject to regulatory requirements that vary from country to country and may differ significantly from those in the United States. In general, our products are regulated outside the United States as medical devices by foreign governmental agencies similar to the FDA.

Marketing a medical device internationally. For us to market our products internationally, we must obtain clearances or approvals for products and product modifications. We are required to affix the CE mark to our products to sell them in member countries of the European Union (“EU”). The CE mark is an international symbol of adherence to certain essential principles of safety and effectiveness, which once affixed enables a product to be sold in member countries of the EEA. The CE mark is also recognized in many countries outside the EU, such as SwitzerlandFinland and Norway and can assist in the clearance process. To receive permission to affix the CE mark to our medical devices products, we must obtain approvals and Quality System certification, e.g. e.g., ISO 13485, through an accredited Notified Body and must otherwise have a quality management system that complies with the EU Medical Device Directive to be superseded by the EU MDR-Medical Device Regulations in May 2020.2021. The ISO promulgates standards for certification of quality assurance operations. We are certified as complying with the ISO 9001 for our security and inspection products and ISO 13485 for our medical devices. Several Asian countries, including Japan and China, have adopted regulatory schemes that are comparable, and in some cases more stringent, than the EU scheme. To import medical devices into Japan, the requirements of Japan’s Newthe Japanese Pharmaceutical and Medical Device RegulationAct must be met and an approval to sell medical products in Japan, must be obtained. Similarly, a registration certification issued by the National Medical Products Administration and a China Compulsory Certification mark for certain products are required to sell medical devices in China. Obtaining such certifications on our products can be time-consuming and can cause us to delay marketing or sales of certain products in such countries. Similarly, prior to selling a device in Canada, manufacturers of Class II devices must obtain a medical device license infrom Health Canada. Additionally, many countries have laws and regulations relating to radiation and radiation safety that apply to our products. In most countries, radiological regulatory agencies require some form of licensing or

registration by the facility prior to acquisition and operation of an X-ray generating device or a radiation source. The handling, transportation and recycling of radioactive metals and source materials are also highly regulated.

A number of countries, including the members of the EU, have implemented or are implementing regulations that would require manufacturers to dispose, or bear certain disposal costs, of products at the end of a product’s useful life and restrict the use of some hazardous substances in certain products sold in those countries. While these regulations could impose a future cost on the Company, the compliance programs are in place to anticipate or establish best estimates of what the potential exposure of such costs could be should they arise.

Manufacturing and selling a device internationally. We are subject to laws and regulations outside the United States applicable to manufacturers of radiation-producing devices and products utilizing radioactive materials, and laws and regulations of general applicability relating to matters such as environmental protection, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices and other matters, in each case that are often comparable to, if not more stringent than, regulations in the United States. In addition, our sales of products in foreign countries are subject to regulation of matters such as product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, import restrictions, environmental and product recycling requirements, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. In some countries, we rely on our foreign distributors and agents to assist us in complying with foreign regulatory requirements.

Other applicable international regulations. In addition to the U.S. laws regarding the privacy and integrity of patient medical information, we are subject to similar laws and regulations in foreign countries covering data privacy and other protection of health and employee information. Particularly within Europe, data protection legislation is comprehensive and complex and there has been a recent trend toward more stringent enforcement of requirements regarding protection and confidentiality of personal data, as well as
9

enactment of stricter legislation. We are also subject to international “fraud and abuse” laws and regulations, as well as false claims and misleading advertisement laws. We also must comply with numerous international laws of more general applicability relating to such matters as environmental protection, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, fire hazard control and other matters.

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit”. Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws to replace or replicate. Given the lack of comparable precedent, it is unclear what financial, regulatory and legal implications the withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U. would have and how such withdrawal would affect us. We currently have UK based Notified Bodies that must be transferred to an EU Member State recognized Notified Body.

Anti-Corruption Laws and Regulations
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-corruption laws, and similar laws in foreign countries, such as the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 which became effective on July 1, 2011, and the law “On the Fundamentals of Health Protection in the Russian Federation,” which became effective in January 2012.Federation”. In general, there is a worldwide trend to strengthen anti-corruption laws and their enforcement, and the healthcare industry and medical equipment manufacturers have been particular targets of these investigation and enforcement efforts. Any violation of these laws by us or our agents or distributors could create a substantial liability for us, subject our officers and directors to personal liability and also cause a loss of reputation in the market.

Transparency International’s 20152020 Corruption Perceptions Index measured the degree to which public sector corruption is perceived to exist in 168180 countries/territories around the world and found that two-thirds of the countries in the index, including many that we consider to be high-growth areas for our products, such as China and India, scored below 50, on a scale from 100 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt). We currently operate in many countries where the public sector is perceived as being more or highly corrupt and our strategic business plans include expanding our business in regions and countries that are rated as higher risk for corruption activity by Transparency International.

Increased business in higher-risk countries could subject us and our officers and directors to increased scrutiny and increased liability. In addition, becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with laws, rules and regulations applicable to new business activities and mitigating and protecting against corruption risks could be quite costly. Failure by us or our agents or distributors to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could delay our expansion into high-growth markets and could materially and adversely affect our business.

Competition and Trade Compliance Laws

We are subject to various competition and trade compliance laws in the jurisdictions where we operate. Regulatory or government authorities where we operate may have enforcement powers that can subject us to sanctions and can impose changes or conditions in the way we conduct our business. For example, local authorities may disagree with how we classify our products, and we may be required to change our classifications, which could increase our operating costs or subject us to increased taxes or fines and

penalties. In addition, an increasing number of jurisdictions also provide private rights of action for competitors or consumers to seek damages asserting claims of anti-competitive conduct. Increased government scrutiny of our actions or enforcement or private rights of action could materially and adversely affect our business or damage our reputation. In addition, we may conduct, or we may be required to conduct, internal investigations or face audits or investigations by one or more domestic or foreign government or regulatory agencies, which could be costly and time-consuming, and could divert our management and key personnel from our business operations. An adverse outcome under any such investigation or audit could subject us to increased costs, fines or criminal or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our business and financial results. Furthermore, competition laws may prohibit or increase the cost of future acquisitions that we may desire to undertake.

International sales of certain of our Linatron® X-ray accelerators are subject to U.S. export licenses that are issued at the discretion of the U.S. government. Orders and revenues for our security and inspection products have been and may continue to be unpredictable as governmental agencies may place large orders with us or with our customers over a short period of time and then may not place additional orders until complete deployment and installation of previously ordered products. We have seen domestic and international governments postpone purchasing decisions and delay installations of products for security and inspection systems. Furthermore, tender awards in this business may be subject to challenge by third parties, as we have previously encountered, which can make the conversion of orders to revenues unpredictable for some security and inspection products. The market for border protection systems has slowed significantly and end customers, particularly in oil-based economies and war zones in which we have a significant customer base, are delaying system deployments or tenders and have considered moving to alternative sources.

Intellectual Property

We place considerable importance on obtaining and maintaining patent, copyright and trade secret protection for significant new technologies, products and processes, because of the length of time and expense associated with bringing new products through the development process and to the marketplace.

10

We generally rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret and other laws, and contractual restrictions on disclosure, copying and transferring title, including confidentiality agreements with vendors, strategic partners, co-developers, employees, consultants and other third parties, to protect our proprietary rights in the developments, improvements and inventions that we have originated and which are incorporated in our products or that fall within our fields of interest. As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, we own over 290275 patents issued in the United States, over 370400 patents issued throughout the rest of the world and had approximately another 160150 patent applications pending with various patent agencies worldwide. The patents and patents issuing from the pending applications generally expire between 20192021 and 2037.2040. We intend to file additional patent applications as appropriate. We have trademarks, both registered and unregistered, that are maintained and enforced to provide customer recognition for our products in the marketplace. We also have agreements with third parties that provide for licensing of patented or proprietary technology, including royalty-bearing licenses and technology cross-licenses. These licenses generally can only be terminated for breach. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors-ProtectingFactors - Risks Relating to our intellectual property can be costly,Intellectual Property and we may not be able to maintain licensed rights, and, in either case, our competitive position would be harmed if we are not able to do so.Information Systems.

In conjunction with the January 2017 separation from Varian, we entered into an Intellectual Property Matters Agreement with Varian, pursuant to which, among other things, we each granted the other licenses to use certain intellectual property.

Environmental Matters

Our operations and facilities, past and present, are subject to environmental laws, including laws that regulate the handling, storage, transport and disposal of hazardous substances. Certain of those laws impose cleanup liabilities under certain circumstances. In connection with those laws and certain of our past and present operations and facilities, we are obligated to indemnify Varian for 20% of the cleanup liabilities related to prior corporate restructuring activities while a division of Varian and fully indemnify Varian for other liabilities arising from the operations of the business transferred to it as part of those activities. Those include facilities sold as part of Varian’s electron devices business in 1995 and thin film systems business in 1997. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or third parties have named Varian as a potentially responsible party under the amended Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), at sites to which Varian or the facilities of the businesses sold in 1995 and 1997 were alleged to have shipped waste for recycling or disposal (the “CERCLA sites”). We anticipate that we will be obligated to reimburse Varian for 20% of the liabilities of Varian related to these CERCLA sites (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds or tax benefits received by Varian). In connection with the CERCLA sites, to date Varian has been required to pay only a small portion of the total cleanup costs and we anticipate that any reimbursement to Varian in the future will not be material. As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, we had an existing environmental liability of approximately $0.9$0.6 million, net of expected insurance proceeds, related to the CERCLA sites.


Working Capital

Our working capital needs and our credit practices are comparable to those of other companies manufacturing and selling similar products in similar markets. We endeavor to carry sufficient levels of inventory to meet the product delivery needs of our customers. We also provide payment terms to customers in the normal course of business. The product warranty obligations contained in our standard terms and conditions typically range from 12 to 24 months, depending on the product.

EmployeesHuman Capital Resources

Talent Management
    To remain a leading innovator, designer and manufacturer of critical components of X-ray based diagnostic equipment, it is crucial that we continue to attract and retain exceptional talent. Our business results depend on our ability to successfully manage our human capital resources, including attracting, identifying, and retaining key talent. Factors that may affect our ability to attract and retain qualified employees include employee morale, our reputation, competition from other employers, and availability of qualified individuals.
As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, we had approximately 2,0002,100 full-time and part-time employees worldwide. None of our employees based in the United States are unionized or subject to collective bargaining agreements. Employees based in some foreign countries may, from time to time, be represented by works councils or unions or subject to collective bargaining agreements. We currently consider our relations with our employees to be good.
    As part of our people management strategy, we monitor employee morale and our market reputation. To better understand how to measure the effectiveness of our people management strategy, and to establish a baseline understanding of employee loyalty and retention, we solicit feedback from our employees in the form of an employee net promoter survey. The results of this survey are
11

aggregated, and we hold meetings with employees to share and discuss areas of improvement. We believe this is an effective process to inform how future decisions are made in order to improve employee morale and engagement.

Total Rewards
    We invest in our workforce by offering a competitive total rewards package that includes a combination of salaries and wages, health and wellness benefits, equity incentives, retirement benefits, and educational benefits. We strive to offer competitive total rewards package that is responsive to local needs. In the United States, where our largest employee base resides, our benefits for eligible employees have included:

Affordable health insurance coverage available to full-time employees;
Tuition reimbursement up to a specified dollar amount on an annual basis;
Matching contributions to a tax-qualified defined contribution savings ("401(k)") plan, on a dollar-for-dollar basis up to four percent of the employee’s base compensation;
An employee assistance program; and
Training and development programs designed to help employees improve workplace performance.
    Approximately 90% of our eligible employees participate in our 401(k) plan, which positions us as a top performer among similarly situated companies. In addition, in an effort to further align the interests of our employees with our stockholders, we have an equity-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock units to directors, officers and other eligible employees. Additionally, to create performance incentives and to encourage share ownership by our employees, we have implemented an employee stock purchase plan, which enables eligible employees to purchase our common stock at a discount through payroll contributions.
    During fiscal year 2020, due to the impact of COVID-19 on our business, it was necessary to modify or freeze certain benefits historically provided to our employees, such as 401(k) plan matching contributions and tuition reimbursements. During the second half of fiscal year 2021, we reinstated both the 401(k) matching contributions and tuition reimbursement program.

Safety and Wellness
    The health and safety of our workforce is fundamental to the success of our business. We provide our employees upfront and ongoing safety training to ensure that safety policies and procedures are effectively communicated and implemented. Personal protective equipment is provided to those employees where needed for the employee to safely perform their job function. We have experienced personnel on site at each of our manufacturing locations that are tasked with environmental, health and personal safety education and compliance and, in Salt Lake City, we have an onsite nurse practitioner available to our employees for medical needs.
    Because our business involves the manufacture of physical products, many of our employees are unable to work from home. In an effort to keep our employees safe and to maintain operations during the COVID-19 pandemic, we have implemented a number of new health-related measures, including social-distancing, restrictions on visitors to our facilities, limiting in-person meetings and other gatherings, and providing employees with additional time-off for COVID-19 related absences. As COVID-19 vaccinations became available we incentivized our employees to become vaccinated, and then discontinued additional time-off programs in June 2021. In September 2021, we made the decision to bring non-essential workers back to facilities in the U.S., at the time of the decision we estimated that 72% of the workforce had been vaccinated based on vaccine incentive payments. In addition, we implemented a hybrid-office work program where non-essential employees could work a portion of the workweek from a home office if approved by their leadership to encourage social distancing.

Diversity and Inclusion
    As one of our values states “we embrace equality,” and are committed to a diverse and inclusive workplace that is respectful to all. Some of our initiatives include providing scholarships to the Society of Women Engineers ("SWE") and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics ("STEM") programs, regularly analyzing pay equity, and engaging in on-campus events that increase our exposure to diverse populations to promote diversity in our hiring. We do not tolerate discrimination and harassment, and we expect our teams to conduct themselves ethically at all times in accordance with Varex’s Code of Conduct.

Information Available to Investors

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) maintains an internet site, www.sec.gov, that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the Company and other issuers that file electronically with the SEC. As soon
12

as reasonably practicable after filing with or furnishing to the SEC, we also make the following reports and information available free of charge on the Investors page of our website www.vareximaging.com:

our annual reports on Form 10-K;
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q;
current reports on Form 8-K (including any amendments to those reports); and
proxy statements.

Additionally, our Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation and Management Development Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are also available on the Investors page of our website. Investors and others should note that we announce material financial and operational information to our investors using our investor relations website (http://investors.vareximaging.com/), press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. Please note that information on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Executive Officers of the Registrant
The biographical summaries of our executive officers are as follows:

Sunny S. Sanyal, 55,57, has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director since January 2017. Prior to the separation of Varex from Varian, Sunny served as senior vice president and president of Varian’s Imaging Components business for Varian since February 2014. Prior to joining Varian in 2014, Sunny was chief executive officer of T-System, a privately held company providing information technology solutions and services to hospitals and urgent care facilities. He also served as president of McKesson Provider Technologies, where he led the company to significant market expansion with its clinical software, medical imaging technology, and services solutions. Sunny has held executive positions at GE Healthcare, Accenture, and IDX Systems. He received a Master of Business Administration ("MBA") from Harvard Business School, a Master of Science in industrial engineering from Louisiana State University, and a Bachelor of Engineering in electrical engineering from the University of Bombay.

Clarence R. Verhoef, 64, has    Shubham Maheshwari, 50, has served as Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") since July 2020. Shubham (Sam) joined Varex from SiFive, Inc., a leading provider of hardware and software solutions for developing RISC-V based processors and semiconductor chips, where he served as CFO. Before SiFive, Sam served for six years as CFO, and later as CFO and COO, of Veeco Instruments Inc. (Nasdaq: VECO), a manufacturer of semiconductor process equipment. Previous notable positions include Senior Vice President, since January 2017. Prior toFinance for semiconductor company Spansion, Inc., where he helped lead the separationcompany through its restructuring and IPO in 2010, and more than 10 years in various senior positions, including Vice President of VarexM&A and Corporate Controller, at KLA-Tencor Corp., a global semiconductor equipment company. Sam holds an MBA in Finance from Varian, Clarence served as senior vice president, chief accounting officerWharton, and corporate controller for Varian since August 2012. He joined Varian in 2006 and served as the divisional controller of Varian’s Imaging Components business until 2012. Prior to joining Varian, Clarence served in numerous executive management roles, including chief financial officer of Techniscan Medical Systems, and chief financial officer and vice president of marketing for GE OEC Medical Systems. He holds a bachelor’s degree in financechemical engineering from the UniversityIndian Institute of Utah.Technology, Delhi.

Kimberley E. Honeysett, 48,50, has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary since January 2017. Prior to the separation of Varex from Varian, Kim served as vice president and assistant general counsel and assistant corporate secretary for Varian, where she advised Varian’s Board of Directors, executive management and corporate functions, including business development, investor relations, human resources, information technology and was responsible for corporate governance,

general compliance matters, litigation and global subsidiary governance. Prior to joining Varian in 2005, Kim served as group director, legal affairs at Siebel Systems, Inc., an enterprise software company, and as an associate with the law firm Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP. Kim holds a juris doctor degree from Cornell Law School and a bachelor’s degree in communications from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Brian W. Giambattista, 60,62, has served as Senior Vice President, and General Manager - X-ray Detectors since May 2017 and joined Varex after the acquisition of the PerkinElmer Medical Imaging business. He has nearly 30 years of experience in the industry, having held various management and engineering roles at PerkinElmer and General Electric Company, and received his doctorate degree in physics from the University of Virginia.

Mark S. Jonaitis, 58,60, has served as Senior Vice President and General Manager - X-Ray Sources since January 2017. Prior to the separation of Varex from Varian, Mark served in various management positions at Varian, including most recently vice president and general manager, X‑ray Tube Products and global manufacturing. Mark joined Varian’s predecessor, Varian Associates, in 1983, where he served in various product and engineering positions. Mark received his Bachelor of Science in physics from the University of Utah.
13

Andrew Hartmann, 59, has served as Senior Vice President, Medical Sales & Marketing since July 2018. Prior to joining Varex he worked for a number of leading OEMs in various leadership rolls, most recently as General Manager of the X-ray and Ultrasound Business for Carestream Health, Inc., a worldwide provider of X-ray imaging systems, from April 2012 to June 2018. Prior to Carestream, Andrew worked for Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. (Siemens Healthineers), a leading medical technology company, in sales and marketing rolls both domestically in the United States and internationally for Siemens’ ultrasound business. Prior to Siemens, he held leadership roles at Acuson Corp. (subsequently acquired by Siemens), including General Manager for Acuson’s Australia and New Zealand business. Andrew received a Master of Business Administration (“EMBA”) from Ashridge Business School in London, United Kingdom, and received a diploma in electronics from Sydney Technical College in Australia.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. Although the risk factors described below are the ones management deems significant,material, additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significantnot material may also adversely affect our business operations. If any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties actually occur, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Current economic conditions, including supply chain disruptions and logistical challenges, have increased our costs, and are impacting our ability to obtain materials needed to manufacture our products and to deliver those products to our customers.
    Current economic conditions have had, and we believe will continue to have, an adverse impact on our manufacturing capacity, supply chain and distribution systems. We have experienced difficulties in obtaining materials used to build our products and these difficulties have impacted our ability to deliver finished products to our customers. We believe that it will continue to be difficult to obtain certain materials throughout fiscal year 2022. If our actions to mitigate such challenges are not successful, material shortages could cause us to temporarily stop production of certain products. Production delays could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. For example, if we are unable to deliver products to our customers without unreasonable delay, those customers may seek alternative suppliers or decide to in-source certain products. In addition to material shortages, supply chain logistics have become more challenging, could remain challenging, and result in higher costs and efforts. Our ability to move unfinished goods and finished products around the world has been impacted by the decreased availability of global transportation networks. We have been subject to price increases on both the components used to make our products, and for moving unfinished goods and finished products across the globe. If we are not able to mitigate these price increases and/or raise prices for our products, our operations, cash flow, and financial position could be adversely impacted. In addition, regulatory approvals for certain of our products may continue to be delayed due to COVID-19 related closures.

COVID-19 has adversely impacted our operations, cash flow, and financial position, and in the future we could continue to be adversely impacted, by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic disruptions.
    The pandemic caused by the spread of COVID-19 adversely impacted our operations, cash flow, and financial position. The pandemic has also created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption. Emerging variants and uneven vaccination rates across the globe could lead to additional volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption. New or continuing outbreaks of COVID-19 could lead to future decreases in demand for our products. The actions taken to combat COVID-19 could have a negative impact on future operating results, cash flows and financial condition. We believe that COVID-19’s adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows and financial condition will be primarily driven by: the severity and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic; the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on the U.S. and international healthcare systems, the U.S. economy and worldwide economy; and the timing, scope and effectiveness of U.S. and international governmental responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated economic disruptions. In addition, government action related to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as new regulations mandating vaccines for companies with over 100 employees and for government contractors could have an adverse impact on our business and operating results by, among other things, increasing costs to verify compliance and making it more difficult to retain existing employees or hire new workers.

Varex sells its products and services to a limited number of OEM customers, many of which are also its competitors, and a reduction in or loss of business of one or more of these customers may materially reduce its sales.
Varex had one customer during fiscal year 20192021 that accounted for 17%18% of its revenue. Varex’s ten largest customers as a group accounted for approximately 51%, 49%52% and 48%51% of its revenue for fiscal years 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively.
14

Varex sells its products to a limited number of OEM customers, many of which are also its competitors with in-house X-ray component manufacturing operations. Although Varex seeks to broaden its customer base, it will continue to depend on sales to a relatively small number of major customers. Because it often takes significant time to replace lost business, it is likely that Varex’s operating results would be materially and adversely affected if one or more of its major OEM customers were to cancel, delay, or reduce orders in the future.
Furthermore, Varex generates significant accounts receivables from the sale of its products and the provision of services directly to its major customers. If one or more of these customers were to cancel a product order or service contract (whether in accordance with its terms or otherwise), become insolvent or otherwise be unable or fail to pay for Varex products and services, Varex’s operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Varex may not be able to accurately predict the demand for its products by its customers.
End-user product demand, economic uncertainties, the COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters, and other matters beyond Varex’s control make it difficult for its customers to accurately forecast and plan future business activities; which makes it difficult for Varex to accurately predict the demand for its products. Because the manufacture of our products requires some lead-time, changes in customer purchasing forecasts have previously impacted Varex’s business, resulting in excess inventory and slowdowns in sales. Similar inventory adjustments and slowdowns in sales are likely to occur in the future. Changes to customer forecasts can occur on short notice. Varex’s customers also face inherent competitive issues and new product introduction delays which can result in changes in forecasts. The market and regulatory risks faced by Varex’s customers also ultimately impact Varex’s ability to forecast future business. Varex’s agreements for imaging components, such as its three-year pricing agreement with Canon Medical Systems, may contain purchasing estimates that are based on its customers’ historical purchasing patterns rather than firm commitments, and actual purchasing volumes under the agreements may vary significantly from these estimates. The variation from forecasted purchasing volume may be due, in part, to the increasing life of X-ray tubes, which can result in reduced demand for replacement X-ray tubes in ways Varex may not be able to accurately forecast. Reductions in purchasing patterns have in the past and may in the future materially and adversely affect Varex’s operating results. Decreased economic activity associated with the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant negative impact on the demand for our industrial products and that impact could continue or return.


Varex competes in highly competitive markets, and it may lose business to its customers or other companies with greater resources or the ability to develop more effective technologies, or it could be forced to reduce its prices.
Rapidly-evolving technology, intense competition and pricing pressure characterize the market in which Varex competes. Varex often competes with companies that have greater financial, marketing and other resources than Varex. Some of the major diagnostic imaging systems companies, which are the primary OEM customers for Varex’s X-ray components, also manufacture X-ray components, including X-ray tubes, for use in their own imaging systems products. Varex must compete with these in-house manufacturing operations for business. If these customers manufacture a greater percentage of their components in-house or otherwise decrease purchases from external sources, which may occur for a number of reasons, including a strong U.S. Dollar, or a general economic slowdown, Varex could experience reductions in purchasing volume by, or loss of, one or more of these customers. Such a reduction or loss may have a material and adverse effect on its business. In addition, Varex competes against other stand-alone, independent X-ray tube manufacturers for both the OEM business of major diagnostic imaging equipment manufacturers and the independent servicing business for X-ray tubes.
The market for flat panel detectors is also very competitive, and Varex faces intense competition from over a dozen smaller competitors. As a result of these competitive dynamics, to effectively retain the business of its customers and compete with its competitors Varex must have an advantage in one or more significant areas, such as lower product cost, better product quality and/or superior technology and/or performance. Varex has made price concessions to maintain existing customers and attract new customers, and may have to make additional price concessions in the future.
In its industrial segment, Varex competes with other OEM suppliers, primarily outside of the United States. The market for its X-ray tube and flat panel products used for nondestructive testing in industrial applications is small and highly fragmented. Some of Varex’s competitors outside the United States may have resources and support from their governments that Varex does not, such as preferences for local manufacturers, and may not be subject to the same trade compliance regulations as Varex. Therefore, Varex’s ability to compete in certain high-growth markets may be limited compared to its competitors.
Varex’s competitors could develop technologies and products that are more effective than those Varex currently uses or produces or that could render its products obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, the timing of Varex’s competitors’ introduction of products into the market could affect the market acceptance and sales of Varex’s products. Some competitors offer specialized
15

products that provide, or may be perceived by customers to provide, an advantage over Varex’s products. Also, some of Varex’s non-U.S. competitors may not be subject to the same standards, regulatory and/or other legal requirements to which Varex is subject and, therefore, they could have a competitive advantage in developing, manufacturing and marketing products and services. Any inability to develop, gain regulatory approval for and supply commercial quantities of competitive products to the market as quickly and effectively as Varex’s competitors could limit market acceptance of Varex’s products and reduce its sales. Any of these competitive factors could negatively and materially affect Varex’s pricing, sales, revenues, market share and gross margins and its ability to maintain or increase its operating margins.
Changes in import/export regulatory regimes and tariffs could continue to negatively impact our business.
Tariffs and changes in international trade agreements or trade-related laws and regulations may have an indirect adverse impact on our business. As a component manufacturer, our products are integrated into the systems and products of our OEM customers. If the United States, China or other countries levy tariffs, duties or other additional taxes or restrictions on our customer’s products, the demand for such products, and our components included in such products, could decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Uncertainty over tariffs and trade wars could also cause our customers to delay or cancel orders for our products.
In 2018 and 2019, the United States has imposed tariffs on items imported from China that are incorporated into our products. Tariffs on items imported by us from China and other countries have increased our costs and has increased prices and lowered gross margins on some of our products. These tariffs have had a direct adverse impact on our business and results of operations, and future tariffs could have a more significant impact on our business. China has imposed retaliatory tariffs that impact a number of Varex products including U.S. origin X-ray tubes, heat exchange units, and certain flat panel detectors. The tariffs levied by China have increased our customers’ costs for products imported into China, which has caused us to make price concessions on some products and has caused some customers to stop purchasing products from us. We expect that tariffs will continue to have a negative effect on our business and results of operations, including the possibility of continued price concessions or loss of business. Tariffs could limit our ability to compete for increased market share in China, which could cause our long-term prospects in China to suffer. The imposition of additional tariffs by the United States could result in the adoption of additional tariffs by China and other countries,

as well as further retaliatory actions by any affected country, which could negatively impact the global market for imaging equipment and could have a significant adverse effect on our business.
Varex’s success depends on the successful development, introduction, and commercialization of new generations of products and enhancements to or simplifications of existing product lines.
Rapid change and technological innovation characterize the markets in which Varex operates, particularly with respect to flat panel technology. Varex’s customers use its products in their medical diagnostic, security, and industrial imaging systems, and Varex must continually introduce new products at competitive costs while also improving existing products with higher quality, lower costs, and increased features. To be successful, Varex must anticipate its customers’ needs and demands, as well as potential shifts in market preferences. Varex’s failure to do so has in the past resulted, and may in the future result, in the loss of customers and an adverse impact to its financial performance. With a relatively strong U.S. Dollar, Varex’s ability to meet its customers’ pricing expectations is particularly challenging and may result in erosion of product margin and market share.
Varex has in the past spent, and in the future may need to spend, more time and money than it expects to develop, market and introduce new products or enhancements, and, even if Varex succeeds, Varex may not be able to recover all or a meaningful part of its investment. Once introduced, new products may materially and adversely impact sales of Varex’s existing products or make them less desirable or even obsolete, which could materially and adversely impact Varex’s revenues and operating results. In addition, certain costs, including installation and warranty costs, associated with new products may be proportionately greater than the costs associated with other products and may therefore disproportionately, materially, and adversely affect Varex’s gross and operating margins. If Varex is unable to lower these costs over time, Varex’s operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Some of the electronic components and integrated circuits used in Varex’s flat panel detectors are susceptible to discontinuance and obsolescence risks, which may force Varex to incorporate newer generations of these components, resulting in unplanned additional R&D expenses, delays in the launch of new products, supply disruption, or inventory write downs.
Varex’s ability to successfully develop and introduce new products and product enhancements and simplifications, and the revenues and costs associated with these efforts, are affected by Varex’s ability to, among other things:
properly identify customer needs or long-term customer demands;
prove the feasibility of new products;
properly manage and control research and development costs;
limit the time required from proof of feasibility to routine production;
timely and efficiently comply with internal quality assurance systems and processes;
limit the timing and cost of regulatory approvals;
accurately predict and control costs associated with inventory overruns caused by the phase-in of new products and the phase-out of old products;
price its products competitively and profitably, which can be particularly difficult with a strong U.S. Dollar;
manufacture, deliver, and install its products in sufficient volumes on time and accurately predict and control costs associated with manufacturing installation, warranty, and maintenance of the products;
appropriately manage its supply chain;
manage customer acceptance and payment for products; and
anticipate, respond to, and compete successfully with competitors.

Furthermore, as discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, Varex cannot be sure that it will be able to successfully develop, manufacture, or introduce new products or enhancements, the roll-out of which involves compliance with complex quality assurance processes, including the Quality System Regulation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). Failure to complete these processes timely and efficiently could result in delays that could affect Varex’s ability to attract and retain customers or cause customers to delay or cancel orders, which would materially and adversely affect Varex’s revenues and operating results.
16

More than half of Varex’s revenues are generated from customers located outside the United States, and economic, political, and other risks associated with international sales and operations could materially and adversely affect Varex’s sales or make them less predictable.
Varex conducts business globally. Revenues generated from customers located outside the United States accounted for approximately 65%%68%, 65%66% and 66%65% of Varex’s total revenues during fiscal years 2019, 2018,2021, 2020, and 2017,2019, respectively. As a result,

Varex must provide significant service and support globally. Varex intends to continue to expand its presence in international markets and expects to expend significant resources in doing so. Varex cannot be sure that it will be able to meet its sales, service, and support objectives or obligations in these international markets or recover its investment in these international markets. Varex’s future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:
currency fluctuations, and in particular the strength of the U.S. Dollar (which is our functional and reporting currency) relative to many currencies, which have and may in the future adversely affect Varex’s financial results and cause some customers to delay purchasing decisions or move to in-sourcing supply or migrate to lower cost alternatives or ask for additional discounts;
the longer payment cycles associated with many customers located outside the United States;
difficulties in interpreting or enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through many foreign countries’ legal systems;
changes in restrictions on trade between the United States and other countries or unstable regional political and economic conditions;
changes in the political, regulatory, safety or economic conditions in a country or region
the imposition by governments of additional taxes, tariffs, global economic sanctions programs, or other restrictions on foreign trade such as the tariffs recently put into place by both China and the United States;
any inability to obtain required export or import licenses or approvals, including the inability to obtain required export licenses during a U.S. government shutdown;
natural disasters and pandemics;
failure to comply with export laws and requirements, which may result in civil or criminal penalties and restrictions on Varex’s ability to export its products, particularly its industrial linear accelerator products;
risks unique to the Chinese market, including import barriers and preferences for local manufacturers;
failure to obtain proper business licenses or other documentation or to otherwise comply with local laws and requirements regarding marketing, sales, service, or any other business Varex conducts in a foreign jurisdiction, which may result in civil or criminal penalties and restrictions on its ability to conduct business in that jurisdiction; and
difficulties in protecting Varex’s intellectual property in foreign countries.
Although Varex’s sales fluctuate from period to period, in recent years Varex’s international operations have represented a larger share of its business. The more Varex depends on international sales, the more vulnerable Varex becomes to these factors.
Varex’s business may suffer if it is not able to hire and retain qualified personnel.
    Varex’s future success depends, to a great degree, on its ability to retain, attract, expand, integrate, and train its management team and other key personnel, such as qualified engineering, service, sales, marketing, and other staff. Varex competes for key personnel with other medical equipment and software manufacturers and technology companies, as well as universities and research institutions. Competition for qualified personnel has increased over the past year. Because this competition is intense, particularly in Utah, where unemployment rates are relatively low, compensation-related costs could increase significantly if the supply of qualified personnel decreases or demand increases. If Varex is unable to hire and train qualified personnel, Varex may not be able to maintain or expand its business. Additionally, if Varex is unable to retain key personnel, Varex may not be able to replace them readily or on terms that are reasonable, which also could hurt its business.

A change in the percentage of Varex’s total earnings from international sales or additional changes in tax laws could increase Varex’s effective tax rate.     
Varex’s effective tax rate is impacted by tax laws in both the United States and in foreign countries. Earnings from Varex’s international subsidiaries are generally taxed at rates that differ from U.S. rates. A change in the percentage of Varex’s total earnings from the international subsidiaries, a change in the mix of particular tax jurisdictions between the international subsidiaries, or a change in currency exchange rates could cause Varex’s effective tax rate to increase. TheWhile the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017. Prior to the enactment of U.S. Tax Reform, Varex was not taxed in the United States on certain undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. While U.S. Tax Reform imposed a current tax on cumulative undistributed earnings, these earnings could also become subject to incremental foreign withholding or U.S. state taxes should they be actually remitted to the United States, in which case Varex’s financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
The
17

    Statutory changes included in U.S. Tax Reform are broad, complex, and subject to change and interpretation. Additional statutory changes orproposed US legislation, if passed, including interpretive guidance, issued by Federal or local authorities could have a material impact on income tax expense, the effective rate, or the value of deferred tax assets and liabilities. In addition, significant judgments and estimates are required to evaluate our tax position and the impact of the new tax law. If these judgments and estimates are incorrect, or if the underlying assumptions are modified by subsequent guidance or are different from what we expect, our tax liability could differ significantly from our current estimates. Changes in the valuation of Varex’s deferred tax assets or liabilities, additional changes in tax laws or rates, changes in the interpretation of tax laws in other jurisdictions, or other changes beyond Varex’s control could materially and adversely affect its financial position and results of operations.
Varex has entities in certain jurisdictions with cumulative net operating losses for which no income tax benefit can be recorded due to full valuation allowance positions. There could be additional future losses in these and other jurisdictions that would negatively impact Varex's effective tax rate.

Our secured revolving credit facility and secured term loan credit facility (collectively the “Credit Facility”) restrict certain activities, and failure to comply with the terms of this facility may have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity and financial position.
Varex is party to a secured revolving credit facility and a secured term loan credit facility, each of which contains restrictive financial covenants, including financial covenants that require Varex to comply with specified financial ratios. If we do not increase our earnings, we are at risk of not being in compliance with certain of our financial covenants, including our consolidated total leverage ratio and our consolidated senior secured leverage ratio. Varex may have to curtail some of its operations to comply with these covenants. In addition, its credit facilities contain other affirmative and negative covenants that could restrict its operating and financing activities. These provisions limit its ability to, among other things, incur future indebtedness, contingent obligations or liens, guarantee indebtedness, make certain investments and capital expenditures, sell stock or assets, pay dividends and consummate certain mergers or acquisitions. Failure to comply with the credit facility requirements, including the requirement to timely deliver financial statements within applicable grace periods, could result in an event of default under our credit facility. Upon an event of default, if the credit facility documents are not amended or the event of default is not waived, the lender could declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, Varex may not be able to make those payments or borrow sufficient funds from alternative sources to make those payments. Even if Varex were to obtain additional financing, that financing may be on unfavorable terms.
Varex has significant debt obligations that could adversely affect its business, profitability and ability to meet its obligations.
As of September 27, 2019, Varex’s total combined indebtedness, net of deferred loan costs, was approximately $395.1 million. The borrowings under Varex’s credit facilities bear interest at floating interest rates. As part of its overall risk management practices, Varex entered into financial derivatives, particularly interest rate swaps designed as cash flow hedges, to hedge the floating LIBOR interest rate on $264.4 million of its debt. As a result, Varex will be exposed to fluctuations in interest rates to the extent of the balance of its borrowings under the LIBOR-based portion of its credit facilities.
Varex's debt could potentially have important consequences to Varex and its investors, including:
requiring that a portion of Varex’s cash flow from operations be used to make principal and interest payments on this debt, which would reduce cash flow available for other corporate purposes;
increasing Varex’s vulnerability to shifts in interest rates and to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
limiting Varex’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry; and
limiting Varex’s ability to borrow additional funds as needed or increasing the costs of any such borrowing.
In addition, Varex’s actual cash requirements in the future may be greater than expected. Varex’s cash flow from operations may not be sufficient to repay all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due, and Varex may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms, or at all, to refinance Varex’s debt.
Fulfilling obligations incidental to being a public company place significant demands on Varex’s management, administrative, and operational resources, including accounting and information technology resources.
As a public company, Varex is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and is required to prepare its financial statements according to the rules and regulations required by the SEC. The Exchange Act requires that Varex file annual, quarterly, and current reports. Varex’s failure to prepare and disclose this information in a timely manner or to otherwise comply with applicable law could subject it to penalties under federal securities laws, cause it to be out of compliance with applicable stock exchange listing requirements, and expose it to lawsuits and restrict its ability to access financing. For example, as a result of the delayed filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq advising us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements.  While with the filing of our Form 10-K we will regain compliance with the Nasdaq listing requirements, if we had failed to regain compliance in a timely manner, it would have negatively impacted Varex.
Varex must, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and disclosure purposes. Internal control over financial reporting is complex and may be revised over time to adapt to changes in Varex’s business or changes in applicable accounting rules. As described in the following risk factor, Varex has identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. Varex cannot assure that its internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future or that additional material weaknesses will not be discovered with respect to a prior period for which it had previously believed that internal controls were effective.

Matters impacting Varex’s internal controls may cause Varex to be unable to report its financial information on a timely basis or may cause Varex to restate previously-issued financial information, thereby subjecting Varex to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions or investigations by the SEC or in respect of violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in Varex and the reliability of its financial statements, which could affect Varex’s stock price.
The delayed filing of some of this Annual Report has made Varex currently ineligible to use a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the offer and sale of securities, which could adversely affect its ability to raise future capital or complete acquisitions.

As a result of the delayed filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-k, Varex will not be eligible to register the offer and sale of our securities using a registration statement on Form S-3 until one year from the date it regained and maintains its status as a current filer. Should Varex wish to register the offer and sale of its securities to the public prior to the time it is eligible to use Form S-3, both the transaction costs and the amount of time required to complete the transaction could increase, making it more difficult to execute any such transaction successfully and potentially harming our financial condition.

Varex identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting which, if not remediated appropriately or timely, could result in loss of investor confidence and adversely impact our stock price.

As further described in Item 9A of this report, at the end of each of fiscal year 2019 and 2018, management determined that Varex’s internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has identified material weaknesses within our risk assessment process and control environment. Management also identified business process control deficiencies which resulted in material weaknesses in the business processes for revenue, inventory and financial close. These material weaknesses resulted in immaterial audit adjustments and out of period adjustments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Until remediated, these material weaknesses could result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. There can be no assurance that the remedial measures being implemented by Varex's management will be successful. If Varex is unable to remediate the material weaknesses, or is otherwise unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting or disclosure controls and procedures, Varex's ability to record, process and report financial information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within required time periods, could be adversely affected, which could subject Varex to litigation or investigations requiring management resources and payment of legal and other expenses, including civil penalties, negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements and adversely impact our stock price.

Varex may face additional risks from the acquisition or development of new lines of business.
From time to time, Varex may acquire or develop new lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with new lines of business, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. Risks include developing knowledge of and experience in the new business, recruiting market professionals, increasing research and development expenditures, and developing and capitalizing on new relationships with experienced market participants. This may mean significant investment and involvement of Varex’s senior management to acquire or develop, then integrate, the business into its operations. Timelines for integration of new businesses may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible, as new products can carry lower gross margins than existing products. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences may also impact whether implementation of a new business will be successful. Failure to manage these risks could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s business, results of operations, and/or financial condition.
Varex may be unable to complete future acquisitions or realize expected benefits from acquisitions of or investments in new businesses, products, or technologies, which could harm Varex’s business.
Varex’s ability to identify and take advantage of attractive acquisitions or other business development opportunities is an important component in implementing its overall business strategy. Varex must grow its businesses in response to changing technologies, customer demands, and competitive pressures. In some circumstances, Varex may decide to grow its business through the acquisition of complementary businesses, products, or technologies, rather than through internal development; however, there is no guarantee that these acquisitions will be successful or that Varex will realize a return on its investment.
Identifying suitable acquisition candidates can be difficult, time consuming, and costly, and Varex may not be able to identify suitable candidates or successfully complete or finance identified acquisitions, including as a result of failing to obtain regulatory or competition clearances, which could impair Varex’s growth and ability to compete. In addition, completing an acquisition can divert

Varex’s management and key personnel from its current business operations, which could harm its business and affect its financial results. Even if Varex completes an acquisition, Varex may not be able to successfully integrate newly-acquired organizations, products, technologies, or employees into its operations or may not fully realize some of the expected synergies.
Integrating an acquisition can also be expensive and time consuming and may strain Varex’s resources. It may cost Varex more to commercialize new products than originally anticipated or cause Varex to increase its expenses related to research and development, either of which could materially and adversely impact its results of operations. In many instances, integrating a new business will also involve implementing or improving internal controls appropriate for a public company into a business that lacks them. It is also possible that an acquisition could increase Varex’s risk of litigation, as a third party may be more likely to assert a legal claim following an acquisition because of perceived deeper pockets or a perceived greater value of a claim. In addition, Varex may be unable to retain the employees of acquired companies or the acquired company’s customers, suppliers, distributors, or other partners for a variety of reasons, including the fact that these entities may be Varex’s competitors or may have close relationships with its competitors.
Further, Varex may find that it needs to restructure or divest acquired businesses or assets of those businesses. Even if it does so, an acquisition may not produce the full efficiencies, growth, or benefits that were expected. If Varex decides to sell assets or a business, it may be difficult to identify buyers or alternative exit strategies on acceptable terms, in a timely manner, or at all, which could delay the accomplishment of its strategic objectives. Varex may be required to dispose of a business at a lower price or on less advantageous terms, or to recognize greater losses than it had anticipated.
If Varex acquires a business, it allocates the total purchase price to the acquired business’ tangible assets and liabilities, identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities based on their fair values as of the date of the acquisition and records the excess of the purchase price over those values as goodwill. If it fails to achieve the anticipated growth from an acquisition, or if it decides to sell assets or a business, it may be required to recognize an impairment loss on the write down of its assets and goodwill, which could
18

materially and adversely affect its financial results. In addition, acquisitions can result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or expenses, or other charges, any of which could harm Varex’s business and affect its financial results.
Additionally, Varex participates in joint ventures and has investments in privately-held companies, (forfor example, its 40% ownership in dpiX LLC, its major supplier of its amorphous silicon-based thin film transistor arrays (flat panels used in its digital detectors) thatand VEC Imaging GmbH & Co. KG, a joint venture to develop nanotube based x-ray sources. These investments and joint ventures are subject to risk of loss of investment capital.capital as well as other risks. These investments are inherently risky, in some instances because the markets for the technologies or products these companies have under development may never materialize. If these companies do not succeed, Varex could lose some or all of its investment in these companies.
A disruption at Varex’s manufacturing facilities, as well as fluctuating manufacturing costs, could materially and adversely affect its business.
The majority of Varex’s products are manufactured at its facility in Salt Lake City, Utah. Varex’s manufacturing operations are subject to potential power failures, the breakdown, failure, or substandard performance of equipment, the improper installation or operation of equipment, and natural or other disasters. Loss or damage to its manufacturing facility due to any of these factors or otherwise could materially and adversely affect Varex’s ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of its products or otherwise deliver products to meet customer demand or contractual requirements, which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences. Because of There is no guarantee that the time required to obtain regulatory approval and licensing of a manufacturing facility,money invested by Varex may not be available on a timely basis to replace any lost manufacturing capacity. The occurrence of these or any other operational issues at Varex’s manufacturing facilities could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Some of Varex’s products are manufactured in Wuxi, China; Walluf, Germany; Heerlen and Dinxperlo, the Netherlands; and Calamba City, Philippines, which are subject to similar risks but may also face additional regulatory and political risks, which could impact Varex’s ability to manufacture and ship products in a timely manner or at all. Varex manufactures its security products in Las Vegas, Nevada, and certain flat panels in Santa Clara, California, and these operations are also subject to potential power failures, the breakdown, failure, or substandard performance of equipment, the improper installation or operation of equipment, earthquakes, and other disasters, all of which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s ability to deliver products to meet customer demand. In addition, Varex’s costs associated with manufacturing its products can vary significantly from quarter to quarter, and fluctuations thereof may adversely affect its business, operating results, and/or financial condition.

Varex’s results have been and may continue to be affected by continuing worldwide economic instability, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in the price of crude oil and other commodities.
The global economy has been impacted by a number of economic and political factors. In many markets, these conditions have shrunk capital equipment budgets, slowed decision-making and made it difficult for Varex’s customers and vendors to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. This, in turn, has caused Varex’s customers to be more cautious with, and sometimes freeze, delay, or dramatically reduce purchases and capital project expenditures. Some countries have adopted and may in the future adopt austerity or stimulus programs that could negatively affect Varex’s results from period to period. In addition, actions taken by the current U.S. administration and the pending withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (“EU”) may also create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to reduce their spending, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows. An uncertain economic environment may also disrupt supply or affect our service business, as customers’ constrained budgets may result in pricing pressure, extended warranty provisions, and even cancellation of service contracts.
In addition, concerns over continued economic instability could make it more difficult for Varex to collect outstanding receivables. A weak or deteriorating healthcare market would inevitably materially and adversely affect Varex’s business, financial conditions, and results of operations.
Because Varex’s products are generally priced in U.S. Dollars, the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar in the last several years has caused, and could continue to cause, some customers to ask for discounts, delay purchasing decisions, or consider moving to in-sourcing such components or migrating to lower cost alternatives. Further, because Varex’s business is global and some payments may be made in local currency, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can impact its results by affecting product demand, revenues and expenses, and/or the profitability in U.S. Dollars of products and services that Varex provides in foreign markets.
Changes in monetary or other policies here and abroad, including as a result of economic and/or political instability or in reaction thereto, would also likely affect foreign currency exchange rates. Furthermore, if one or more European countries were to replace the Euro with another currency, Varex’s sales in these countries, or in Europe generally, would likely be materially and adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established.
Additionally, fluctuations in commodities prices could materially and adversely affect Varex’s performance. Rising commodities pricesprojects will increase Varex’s costs and those of Varex’s medical OEM customers, which could in turn result in reduced demand for Varex’s products. Further, Varex’s security product revenues from oil-producing countries, in which Varex has a significant customer base, have inyield the past suffered as a result of volatility in oil prices and remain sensitive to fluctuations in the future.
The loss of a supplier or any inability to obtain supplies of important components could restrict Varex’s ability to manufacture products, cause delays in its ability to deliver products, or significantly increase its costs.
Varex obtains from a limited group of suppliers or from sole-source suppliers some of the components included in its products, such as wave guides for industrial linear accelerators, transistor arrays, cesium iodide coatings and specialized integrated circuits for flat panel detectors, X-ray tube targets, housings, glass frames, high-voltage cable, bearings and various other components. For example, Varex’s major supplier of its amorphous silicon-based thin film transistor arrays (flat panels) used in its digital image detectors is dpiX LLC. Although Varex holds a 40% ownership interest in dpiX, Varex does not have majority voting rights and does not have the power to direct the activities of dpiX. In addition, Varian is Varex’s sole source supplier for a key component in linear accelerators used in Varex’s security and inspection products subsystems, which are specially made for Varex. If current suppliers cease producing these components, there can be no assurance that the components will be available from other suppliers on reasonable terms or at all.
If Varex loses any of these limited- or sole-source suppliers, if their operations are substantially interrupted, or if any of them fail to meet performance or quality specifications or delivery deadlines, Varex may be required to obtain and qualify one or more replacement suppliers. Such an event (1) may then also require Varex to redesign or modify its products to incorporate new parts and/or further require Varex to obtain clearance, qualification, or certification of these products, including by the FDA, or obtain other applicable regulatory approvals in other countries, or (2) could significantly increase costs for the affected products and cause material delays in delivery of those and other related products. In addition, manufacturing capacity limitations of any of Varex’s suppliers or other inability of these suppliers to meet increasing demand or delivery deadlines could limit growth opportunities for the affected product lines and damage customer relationships. Shortage of, and greater demand for, components and subassemblies could also

increase manufacturing costs if the supply/demand imbalance increases the price of the components and subassemblies. Any of these events could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and financial results.
A shortage or change in source of, or increase in price of, raw materials could restrict Varex’s ability to manufacture products, cause delays, or significantly increase its cost of goods.
Varex relies on the supplies of certain raw materials such as tungsten, lead, iridium, and copper for security and inspection products and copper, lead, tungsten, rhenium, molybdenum zirconium, and various high grades of steel alloy for X-ray tubes. Worldwide demand, availability, and pricing of these raw materials have been volatile, and Varex expects that availability and pricing will continue to fluctuate in the future. If supplies are restricted or become unavailable or if prices increase, this could constrain Varex’s manufacturing of affected products, reduce its profit margins, or otherwise materially and adversely affect its business.
Varex is required to disclose (1) the presence in a company’s products of certain metals known as “conflict minerals,” which are metals mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, and (2) procedures regarding a manufacturer’s efforts to identify the sourcing of those minerals from this region. Varex’s complex supply chain may inhibit Varex’s ability to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in its products through the due diligence procedures that it implements, which may harm Varex’s reputation. In addition, Varex may encounter challenges in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of Varex products are certified as conflict-free, which could place Varex at a competitive disadvantage if it is unable to do so. Moreover, complying with these rules requires investigative efforts, which has and will continue to cause Varex to incur associated costs and could materially and adversely affect the sourcing, supply, and pricing of materials used in Varex’s products or result in process or manufacturing modifications, all of which could materially and adversely affect its results of operations.

The trading price of Varex’s common stock may decline or fluctuate significantly and fluctuations in Varex’s operating results, including quarterly revenues, and margins, may cause its stock price to be volatile, which could cause losses for its stockholders.

In the past year, Varex's stock price has ranged from a low of $21.57 to a high of $35.00. Varex cannot guarantee that an active trading market will be sustained for its common stock. Nor can Varex predict the prices at which shares of its common stock may trade. Varex has experienced and expects in the future to experience fluctuations in its operating results, including revenues and margins, from period to period. These fluctuations may cause Varex’s stock price to be volatile, which could cause losses for its stockholders.
Varex’s quarterly and annual operating results, including its revenues and margins, may be affected by a number of other factors, including:
the introduction and timing of announcement of new products or product enhancements by Varex and its competitors;
change in its or its competitors’ pricing or discount levels;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other economic uncertainty;
changes in import/export regulatory regimes including the imposition of tariffs on our products or those of our customers;
changes in the relative portion of its revenues represented by its various products, including the relative mix between higher margin and lower-margin products;
the ability to identify and remediate significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal controls;
changes in the relative portion of its revenues represented by its international region as a whole and by regions within the overall region, as well as by individual countries (notably, those in emerging markets);
fluctuation in its effective tax rate, which may or may not be known to Varex in advance;
the availability of economic stimulus packages or other government funding, or reductions thereof;
disruptions in the supply or changes in the costs of raw materials, labor, product components or transportation services;
changes to its organizational structure, which may result in restructuring or other charges;
disruptions in its operations, including its ability to manufacture products, caused by events such as earthquakes, fires, floods, terrorist attacks or the outbreak of epidemic diseases;
the unfavorable outcome of any litigation or administrative proceeding or inquiry, including governmental audits, as well as ongoing costs associated with legal proceedings and governmental audits; and
accounting changes and adoption of new accounting pronouncements.
Because many of Varex’s operating expenses are based on anticipated capacity levels, and a high percentage of these expenses are fixed for the short term, a small variation in the timing of revenue recognition can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. If Varex’s gross margins fall below the expectation of securities analysts and investors, the trading price of Varex common stock may decline.

Compliance with foreign laws and regulations applicable to the marketing, manufacture, and distribution of Varex’s products may be costly, and failure to comply may result in significant penalties and other harm to Varex’s business.
Regulatory requirements affecting Varex’s operations and sales outside the United States vary from country to country, often differing significantly from those in the United States. In general, outside the United States, some of Varex’s products are regulated as medical devices by foreign governmental agencies similar to the FDA.
For Varex to market its products internationally, Varex must obtain clearances or approvals for products and product modifications. These processes (including, for example, in the EU, the European Economic Area (“EEA”), Switzerland, Brazil, Australia, China, Japan and Canada) can be time consuming, expensive and uncertain, which can delay Varex’s ability to market products in those countries. Delays in the receipt of or failure to receive regulatory approvals, the inclusion of significant limitations on the indicated uses of a product, the loss of previously obtained approvals or failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could restrict or prevent Varex from doing business in a country or subject Varex to a variety of enforcement actions and civil or criminal penalties, which would materially and materially and adversely affect its business. In addition, compliance with changing regulatory schemes, such as what may occur in connection with Brexit, may add additional complexity, cost and delays in marketing or selling Varex’s products. The Brexit process has caused legal uncertainty and will likely lead to divergent national laws and regulations. While the full financial, regulatory and legal effects of Brexit are unknown, if the United Kingdom’s regulatory scheme is materially different from the current EU regulatory process, Varex’s regulatory compliance burden will likely increase.
Within the EU/EEA, Varex must obtain, and in turn affix, a CE mark certification, which is a European marking of conformity that indicates that a product meets the essential requirements of the Medical Device Directive. Compliance with the Medical Device Directive is done through a self-certification process that is then verified by an independent certification body called a “Notified Body,” which is an organization empowered by the legislature to conduct this verification. Once the CE mark is affixed, the Notified Body will regularly audit Varex to ensure that it remains in compliance with the applicable European laws and Medical Device Directive. By affixing the CE mark to its product, Varex is certifying that its products comply with the laws and regulations required by the EU/EEA countries, thereby allowing the free movement of its products within these countries and others that accept CE mark standards. If Varex cannot support its performance claims and demonstrate compliance with the applicable European laws and the Medical Device Directive, Varex would lose its right to affix the CE mark to its products, which would prevent Varex from selling its products within the EU/EEA/Switzerland territory and in other countries that recognize the CE mark. In April 2017, the European Commission adopted two new regulations on medical devices. These new regulations impose stricter requirements for placing medical devices in the EU market, as well as for Notified Bodies. These new regulations have resulted in the limited availability of recognized Notified Bodies, which could delay our ability to obtaining CE marks. Varex may be subject to risks associated with additional testing, modification, certification, or amendment of its existing market authorizations, or Varex may be required to modify products already installed at its customers’ facilities to comply with the official interpretations of these revised regulations.
Varex is also subject to international laws and regulations of general applicability relating to matters such as environmental protection, safe working conditions, and manufacturing practices, as well as others. These are often comparable to, if not more stringent than, the equivalent regulations in the United States. Sales overseas are also affected by regulation of matters such as product standards, packaging, labeling, environmental and product recycling requirements, import and export restrictions, tariffs, duties, and taxes.
In addition, Varex is required to timely file various reports with international regulatory authorities similar to the reports it is required to timely file with U.S. regulatory authorities, including reports required by international adverse event reporting regulations. If these reports are not timely filed, regulators may impose sanctions, including temporarily suspending Varex’s market authorizations or CE mark, and sales of its products may suffer.
Further, as Varex enters new businesses or pursues new business opportunities internationally, or as regulatory schemes change, Varex may become subject to additional laws, rules, and regulations. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations is costly. Additionally, in some countries, Varex relies or may rely in the future on foreign distributors and agents to assist in complying with foreign regulatory requirements, and Varex cannot be sure that they will always do so. The failure of Varex or its agents to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could delay the introduction of new products, cause reputational harm, or result in investigations, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, criminal prosecution, or an inability to sell Varex’s products in or to import its products into certain countries, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.

Compliance with U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the marketing, manufacture, and distribution of Varex’s products may be costly, and failure or delays in obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could prevent Varex from distributing its products, require Varex to recall its products, or result in significant penalties or other harm to Varex’s business.
Some of Varex’s products and those of OEMs that incorporate Varex’s products are subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation in the United States. Compliance with these laws and regulations is expensive and time-consuming, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
Generally, Varex’s manufacturing operations for medical devices, and those of its third-party manufacturers, are required to comply with the Quality System Regulations (“QSR”) of the FDA, as well as other federal and state regulations for medical devices and radiation-emitting products. The FDA makes announced and unannounced periodic and on-going inspections of medical device manufacturers to determine compliance with QSR and, in connection with these inspections, issues reports known as Form FDA 483 reports when the FDA believes the manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulations and/or procedures. If observations from the FDA issued on Form FDA 483 reports are not addressed and/or corrective action is not taken in a timely manner and to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA may issue a warning letter and/or proceed directly to other forms of enforcement action. Similarly, if a warning letter were issued, prompt corrective action to come into compliance would be required. Failure to respond in a timely manner to Form FDA 483 observations, a warning letter, or any other notice of noncompliance and to promptly come into compliance could result in the FDA bringing an enforcement action, which could include the total shutdown of Varex’s production facilities, denial of importation rights to the United States for products manufactured in overseas locations, adverse publicity, and criminal and civil fines. The expense and costs of any corrective actions that Varex may take, which may include product recalls, correction and removal of products from customer sites, and/or changes to its product manufacturing and quality systems, could materially and adversely impact Varex’s financial results and may also divert management resources, attention, and time. Additionally, if a warning letter were issued, customers could delay purchasing decisions or cancel orders, and Varex could face increased pressure from its competitors, who could use the warning letter against Varex in competitive sales situations, either of which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s reputation, business, and stock price.
In addition, Varex is required to timely file various reports with the FDA, including reports required by the medical device reporting regulations (“MDRs”), that require Varex report to regulatory authorities if its devices may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. If Varex initiates a correction or removal of a device to reduce a risk to health posed by the device, Varex would be required to submit a publicly-available correction and removal report to the FDA and, in many cases, similar reports to other regulatory agencies. This report could be classified by the FDA as a device recall, which could lead to increased scrutiny by the FDA, other international regulatory agencies, and Varex’s customers regarding the quality and safety of Varex’s devices. If these MDRs or correction and removal reports are not filed on a timely basis, regulators may impose sanctions, sales of Varex’s products may suffer, and Varex may be subject to product liability or regulatory enforcement actions, all of which could harm its business.
Government regulation may also cause significant delays or even prevent the marketing and full commercialization of future products or services that Varex may develop and/or may impose costly requirements on Varex’s business. Further, as Varex enters new businesses or pursues new business opportunities, Varex will become subject to additional laws, rules, and regulations, including FDA and foreign rules and regulations. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations is costly and time consuming. In addition, failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could delay the introduction of new products and could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
If Varex or any of its suppliers, distributors, agents, or customers fail to comply with FDA, Federal Trade Commission, or other applicable U.S. regulatory requirements or are perceived to have failed to comply with regulations, Varex may face:
adverse publicity affecting both Varex and its customers;
increased pressures from competitors;
investigations by governmental authorities;
fines, injunctions, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution;
partial suspension or total shutdown of production facilities or the imposition of operating restrictions;
increased difficulty in obtaining required clearances or approvals or losses of clearances or approvals already granted;
seizures or recalls of Varex products or those of its customers;
delays in purchasing decisions by customers or cancellation of existing orders;
the inability to sell Varex products; and
difficulty in obtaining product liability or operating insurance at a reasonable cost, or at all.

Varex is also subject to federal and state laws and regulations of general applicability relating to matters such as environmental protection, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, and other matters. Insurance coverage is not commercially available for violations of law, including the fines, penalties, or investigatory costs that Varex may incur as the consequence of regulatory violations. Consequently, Varex does not have insurance that would cover this type of liability.
Varex sells certain X-ray tube products as replacements which are subject to medical device certification and product registration laws and regulations, which vary by country and are subject to change, and Varex may be unable to receive registration approval or renewal of existing registrations if it fails to meet regulatory approval requirements or if the approval process becomes commercially infeasible or impractical.

Varex markets and distributes certain X-ray tubes through distributors and third-party/multi-vendor service organizations that are used as equivalent replacements for specific OEM tubes. Varex is subject to medical device certification and product registration laws, which vary by country and are subject to periodic reviews and changes by regulatory authorities in those countries. For example, to sell X-ray tubes for replacement applications in China, product registrations must be approved by the new National Medical Products Administration (“NMPA”). Varex must comply with the requirements of the NMPA, and Varex may not be able to receive registration approval or renewal of existing registrations if it fails to meet regulatory approval requirements or if the process of gaining approval becomes commercially infeasible or impractical. Certain of these local laws and regulations have the effect of serving as a barrier to trade and can be difficult to navigate predictably.
In addition, certain countries in which Varex products are sold require products to undergo re-registration if the product is altered in any significant way, and it may be determined that the separation of Varex from Varian, including Varex’s new name, will require these products to be re-registered as Varex products, even if they are physically unchanged.
These registration processes can be costly and time consuming, and customers may decide to purchase products from Varex’s competitors that do not have to be involved in a re-registration process. In addition, Varex’s inability to receive or renew product registrations may prevent Varex from marketing and/or distributing those particular products for replacement applications in the specific country.
Existing and future healthcare reforms, including the Affordable Care Act and changes to reimbursement rates, may indirectly have a material adverse effect on Varex’s business and results of operations.
Sales of Varex’s products to OEMs in the medical sector indirectly depend on whether adequate reimbursement is available for its customers’ products from a variety of sources, such as government healthcare insurance programs, including U.S. Medicare and Medicaid programs, foreign government programs, private insurance plans, health maintenance organizations, and preferred provider organizations. Without adequate reimbursement, the demand for Varex’s customers’ products, and therefore indirectly Varex’s products, may be limited.
Healthcare reform proposals and medical cost containment measures in the United States and in many foreign countries could limit the use of both Varex’s and its customers’ products, reduce reimbursement available for such use, further tax the sale or use of Varex’s products, and further increase the administrative and financial burden of compliance. These reforms and measures, including the uncertainty in the medical community regarding their nature and effect, could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s and its customers’ purchasing decisions regarding its products and treatments and could harm Varex’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. Varex cannot predict the specific healthcare programs and regulations that will be ultimately implemented by local, regional, and national governments globally. However, any changes that lower reimbursements for Varex’s or its customers’ products and/or procedures using these products, including, for example, existing reimbursement incentives to convert from analog to digital X-ray systems, or changes that reduce medical procedure volumes or increase cost containment pressures on Varex or others in the healthcare sector could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and results of operations.
Varex is subject to federal, state, and foreign laws governing its business practices which, if violated, could result in substantial penalties. Additionally, challenges to or investigations into Varex’s practices could cause adverse publicity and be costly to respond to and thus could harm its business.
Anti-corruption laws and regulations. Varex is subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-corruption laws, as well as similar laws in foreign countries, such as the U.K. Bribery Act and the Law On the Fundamentals of Health Protection in the Russian Federation. In general, there is a worldwide trend to strengthen anti-corruption laws and their enforcement, and the healthcare industry and medical equipment manufacturers have been particular targets of these investigation and enforcement efforts. Any violation of these laws by Varex or its agents or distributors could create substantial liability for Varex, subject its officers and

directors to personal liability, and cause a loss of reputation in the market. Varex operates in many countries, including India and China, where the public sector is perceived as being corrupt. Varex’s strategic business plans include expanding its business in regions and countries that are rated as higher risk for corruption activity by Transparency International e.V., an international non-profit that publishes an annual corruption perception index. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with laws, rules, and regulations applicable to new business activities and mitigating and protecting against corruption risks could be costly. Failure by Varex or its agents or distributors to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could delay its expansion into high-growth markets and could materially and adversely affect its business. Varex will likely do more business, directly and potentially indirectly, in countries where the public sector is perceived to be corrupt. Increased business in higher-risk countries could subject Varex and its officers and directors to increased scrutiny and increased liability from its business operations.
Competition and trade compliance laws. Varex is subject to various competition and trade compliance laws in the jurisdictions where it operates. Regulatory authorities in those jurisdictions may have the power to subject Varex to sanctions and impose changes or conditions in the way Varex conducts its business. An increasing number of jurisdictions provide private rights of action for competitors or consumers to assert claims of anti-competitive conduct and seek damages. Increased government scrutiny of Varex’s actions or enforcement or private rights of action could materially and adversely affect its business or damage its reputation. Varex may be required to conduct internal investigations or face audits or investigations by one or more domestic or foreign government agencies, which could be costly and time consuming and could divert its management and key personnel from its business operations. An adverse outcome under any such investigation or audit could subject Varex to fines and/or or criminal or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and financial results. Furthermore, competition laws may prohibit or increase the cost of future acquisitions that Varex may desire to undertake.
Laws and ethical rules governing interactions with healthcare providers. Varex does not generally sell its products directly to healthcare providers, but may occasionally sell its products to healthcare providers through distributors. The U.S. Medicare and Medicaid “anti-kickback” laws, and similar state laws, prohibit payments or other remuneration that is intended to induce hospitals, physicians, or others either to refer patients or to purchase, lease, or order, or to arrange for or recommend the purchase, lease, or order of healthcare products or services for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. These laws affect Varex’s sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements Varex may have with hospitals, physicians, or other potential purchasers of its products. They particularly impact how Varex structures its sales offerings, including discount practices, customer support, education and training programs, physician consulting, research grants, and other fee-for-service arrangements. These laws are broadly written, and it is often difficult to determine precisely how these laws will be applied to specific circumstances.
Federal and state “false claims” laws generally prohibit knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other government payors that are false or fraudulent, or for items or services that were not provided as claimed. Although Varex does not submit claims directly to payors, manufacturers can be, and have been, held liable under these laws if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims by providing inaccurate billing or coding information to customers or through certain other activities, including promoting products for uses not approved or cleared by the FDA, which is called off-label promotion. Violating “anti-kickback” and “false claims” laws can result in civil and criminal penalties, which can be substantial, as well as potential mandatory or discretionary exclusion from healthcare programs for noncompliance. Even an unsuccessful challenge or investigation into Varex’s practices could cause adverse publicity and be costly to defend and thus could harm its business and results of operations. Additionally, several recently-enacted state and federal laws, including laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, and the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, now require, among other things, extensive tracking and maintenance of databases regarding the disclosure of equity ownership and payments to physicians, healthcare providers, and hospitals. These laws may require Varex to implement the necessary and costly infrastructure to track and report certain payments to healthcare providers. Failure to comply with these new tracking and reporting laws could subject Varex to significant civil monetary penalties.
Varex is subject to similar laws in foreign countries where it conducts business. For example, within the EU, the control of unlawful marketing activities is a matter of national law in each of the member states. The member states of the EU closely monitor perceived unlawful marketing activity by companies. Varex could face civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions if any member state determines that Varex has breached its obligations under such state’s national laws. Industry associations also closely monitor the activities of member companies. If these organizations or authorities name Varex as having breached its obligations under their regulations, rules, or standards, its reputation would suffer, and its business and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

expected returns.
Warranty claims may materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
Varex could experience an increase in warranty claims as a result of issues with product quality or product failures as a direct result of Varex’s design, manufacturing, or issues in its supply chain. Such an occurrence may damage Varex’s market reputation, cause sales to decline, or require repairs or voluntary remedial measures to enhance customer satisfaction, which could materially and adversely impact Varex’s financial results. Increased warranty claims on any given product could cause Varex to halt production on that product and significantly impair Varex’s liquidity and profitability, and cause reputational harm to Varex. Because some categories of products tend to experience higher numbers of warranty claims than others, a shift in the types of products that Varex’s customers purchase could lead to an increase in warranty claims. If actual levels of warranty claims are greater than the level of claims Varex estimates, cost of sales could increase, and Varex’s financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, product quality issues could result in significant follow-on effects for Varex, including, among other things, reputational harm to Varex and its customers, loss of customers, and liability as a result of product quality issues. These outcomes would materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and financial condition.

Product defects or misuse may result in material product liability or professional errors and omissions claims, litigation, investigation by regulatory authorities, or product recalls that could harm Varex’s future revenues and require it to pay material uninsured claims.
    Varex’s business exposes it to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacture, sale, installation, servicing, and support of components that are used in medical devices and other devices that deliver radiation. Because Varex’s products, through incorporation in OEMs’ systems, are involved in the intentional delivery of radiation to the human body and other situations where people may come into contact with radiation (for example, when Varex’s security and inspection products are being used to scan cargo or in the diagnosis of medical problems), the possibility for significant personal injury or loss of life exists. Although Varex’s products are incorporated into OEMs’ systems, and thus only perform pursuant to the design and operating systems of OEMs, Varex may also be subject to claims for property damage, personal injury, or economic loss related to or resulting from any errors or defects in its products or the installation, servicing, or support of its products. Any accident or mistreatment could subject Varex to legal costs, litigation, adverse publicity, and damage to its reputation, whether or not its products or services were a factor.
    If Varex’s X-ray inspection systems fail to detect the presence of bombs, explosives, weapons, contraband, or other threats to personal safety, Varex could be subject to product and other liability claims or negative publicity, which could result in increased costs, reduced sales, and a decline in the market price of Varex’s common stock. There are many factors beyond Varex’s control that could result in the failure of its products to detect the presence of bombs, explosives, weapons, contraband, or other threats to personal safety, including operator error and misuse of or malfunction of Varex equipment. The failure of Varex’s systems to detect the presence of these dangerous materials may lead to personal injury, loss of life, and extensive property damage and may result in potential claims against Varex.
    Product liability actions are subject to uncertainty and may be expensive, time consuming, and disruptive to Varex’s operations. For these and other reasons, Varex may choose to settle product liability claims against it regardless of their actual merit. A product liability action determined against Varex could result in adverse publicity or significant damages, including the possibility of punitive damages, and Varex’s combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
    If a product Varex designs or manufactures were defective (whether due to design, labeling or manufacturing defects, improper use of the product, or other reasons), Varex may be required to correct or recall the product and notify regulatory authorities. The adverse publicity resulting from a correction or recall could damage Varex’s reputation and cause customers to review and
19

potentially terminate their relationships with Varex. A product correction or recall could consume management time and have an adverse financial impact on its business, including incurring substantial costs, losing revenues, and accruing losses.
    Varex maintains limited product liability insurance coverage. Varex’s product liability insurance policies are expensive and have high deductible amounts and self-insured retentions. Varex’s insurance coverage may prove to be inadequate, and future policies may not be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts, if at all. If a material claim is not insured or is in excess of Varex’s insurance coverage, Varex could have to pay substantial damages, which could have a material and adverse effect on its financial position and/or results of operations.

Risks Relating to the Manufacture of our Products

Supply chain disruptions, including the loss of a supplier, and any inability to obtain supplies of important components have impacted Varex’s ability to manufacture products, have caused delays in its ability to deliver products, and have increased its costs and may continue to do so.
    As discussed under the heading "Risks Related to our Business" above, supply chain disruptions have had, and will likely continue to have, an impact on Varex’s ability to manufacture its products. Varex has experienced delays in receiving materials used to make its products due both to material shortages and shipping delays. These delays are likely to continue. In recent months, material shortages have increased and if not timely remedied, these material shortages could cause us to temporarily stop production of certain products. If Varex is unable to obtain the materials necessary to make its products or must pay more for those materials, it could have a material adverse effect on Varex’s business and financial results.
    Varex obtains from a limited group of suppliers or from sole-source suppliers some of the components included in its products, such as wave guides for industrial linear accelerators, transistor arrays, cesium iodide coatings and specialized integrated circuits for flat panel detectors, X-ray tube targets, housings, glass frames, high-voltage cable, bearings and various other components. For example, Varex’s major supplier of its amorphous silicon-based thin film transistor arrays (flat panels) used in its digital image detectors is dpiX LLC. Although Varex holds a 40% ownership interest in dpiX, Varex does not have majority voting rights and does not have the power to direct the activities of dpiX. In addition, Varian is Varex’s sole source supplier for a key component in linear accelerators used in Varex’s security and inspection products subsystems, which are specially made for Varex. If current suppliers cease producing these components, there can be no assurance that the components will be available from other suppliers on reasonable terms or at all.
    If Varex loses any of these limited- or sole-source suppliers, if their operations are substantially interrupted, or if any of them fail to meet performance or quality specifications or delivery deadlines, Varex may be required to obtain and qualify one or more replacement suppliers or to manufacture the components internally. Such an event (1) may then also require Varex to redesign or modify its products to incorporate new parts and/or further require Varex to obtain clearance, qualification, or certification of these products, including by the FDA, or obtain other applicable regulatory approvals in other countries, or (2) could significantly increase costs for the affected products and cause material delays in delivery of those and other related products. In addition, manufacturing capacity limitations of any of Varex’s suppliers or other inability of these suppliers to meet increasing demand or delivery deadlines could limit growth opportunities for the affected product lines and damage customer relationships. Shortage of, and greater demand for, components and subassemblies could also increase manufacturing costs if the supply/demand imbalance increases the price of the components and subassemblies. Any of these events could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and financial results. If Varex decides to manufacturer a component that was previously purchased from an external supplier, Varex may not be able to manufacture the component as efficiently as the external supplier and may experience delays or problems in successfully manufacturing the component, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s ability to manufacture and supply products to customers.
Shortages, changes in source of, and increased in prices for, raw materials have negatively impacted Varex’s ability to manufacture products, have caused delays, and have increased its cost of goods.
    Varex relies on the supplies of certain raw materials such as tungsten, lead, iridium, and copper for security and inspection products and copper, lead, tungsten, rhenium, molybdenum zirconium, and various high grades of steel alloy for X-ray tubes. Worldwide demand, availability, and pricing of these raw materials have been volatile. Varex expects that availability and pricing will continue to fluctuate in the future. If supplies are restricted or become unavailable or if prices increase further, this could constrain Varex’s manufacturing of affected products, reduce its profit margins, or otherwise materially and adversely affect its business.
    Varex is required to disclose (1) the presence in a company’s products of certain metals known as “conflict minerals,” which are metals mined from the Democratic Republic of the Congo and adjoining countries, and (2) procedures regarding a manufacturer’s
20

efforts to identify the sourcing of those minerals from this region. Varex’s complex supply chain may inhibit Varex’s ability to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in its products through the due diligence procedures that it implements, which may harm Varex’s reputation. In addition, Varex may encounter challenges in satisfying customers who require that all of the components of Varex products are certified as conflict-free, which could place Varex at a competitive disadvantage if it is unable to do so. Moreover, complying with these rules requires investigative efforts, which has and will continue to cause Varex to incur associated costs and could materially and adversely affect the sourcing, supply, and pricing of materials used in Varex’s products or result in process or manufacturing modifications, all of which could materially and adversely affect its results of operations.

If Varex is not able to match its manufacturing capacity with demand for its products, its financial results may suffer.
Many of Varex’s products have a long production cycle, and Varex must anticipate demand for its products to ensure adequate manufacturing or testing capacity. If Varex is unable to anticipate demand, and its manufacturing or testing capacity does not keep pace with product demand, Varex will not be able to fulfill orders in a timely manner, which may negatively impact its financial results and overall business. Conversely, if demand for Varex’s products decreases, the fixed costs associated with excess manufacturing capacity may harm its financial results, including by decreasing gross margins and increasing research and development costs as a percentage of revenue.

A disruption at Varex’s manufacturing facilities, as well as fluctuating manufacturing costs, could materially and adversely affect its business.
    The majority of Varex’s products are manufactured at its facility in Salt Lake City, Utah. Varex’s manufacturing operations are subject to potential power failures, the breakdown, failure, or substandard performance of equipment, the improper installation or operation of equipment, pandemics, and natural or other disasters. Loss or damage to its manufacturing facility due to any of these factors or otherwise could materially and adversely affect Varex’s ability to manufacture sufficient quantities of its products or otherwise deliver products to meet customer demand or contractual requirements, which may result in a loss of revenue and other adverse business consequences. Because of the time required to obtain regulatory approval and licensing of a manufacturing facility, Varex may not be available on a timely basis to replace any lost manufacturing capacity. The occurrence of these or any other operational issues at Varex’s manufacturing facilities could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
    Some of Varex’s products are manufactured in Wuxi, China; Walluf, Germany; Doetinchem, the Netherlands; and Calamba City, Philippines, which are subject to similar risks but may also face additional regulatory and political risks, which could impact Varex’s ability to manufacture and ship products in a timely manner or at all. Varex also manufactures security products in Las Vegas, Nevada, and these operations are also subject to potential power failures, the breakdown, failure, or substandard performance of equipment, the improper installation or operation of equipment, earthquakes, and other disasters, all of which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s ability to deliver products to meet customer demand. In addition, Varex’s costs associated with manufacturing its products can vary significantly from quarter to quarter, and fluctuations thereof may adversely affect its business, operating results, and/or financial condition.
Varex’s results have been and may continue to be affected by continuing worldwide economic instability, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in the price of crude oil and other commodities.
    The global economy has been impacted by a number of economic and political factors. In many markets, these conditions have shrunk capital equipment budgets, slowed decision-making and made it difficult for Varex’s customers and vendors to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. This, in turn, has caused Varex’s customers to be more cautious with, and sometimes freeze, delay, or dramatically reduce purchases and capital project expenditures. Some countries have adopted and may in the future adopt austerity or stimulus programs that could negatively affect Varex’s results from period to period. In addition, actions taken by the current U.S. administration may also create global economic uncertainty, which may cause our customers to reduce their spending, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, and cash flows. An uncertain economic environment may also disrupt supply or affect our service business, as customers’ constrained budgets may result in pricing pressure, extended warranty provisions, and even cancellation of service contracts. In addition, concerns over continued economic instability could make it more difficult for Varex to collect outstanding receivables. A weak or deteriorating healthcare market would inevitably materially and adversely affect Varex’s business, financial conditions, and results of operations.
    Because Varex’s products are generally priced in U.S. Dollars, the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar in the last several years has caused, and could continue to cause, some customers to ask for discounts, delay purchasing decisions, or consider moving to in-sourcing such components or migrating to lower cost alternatives. Further, because Varex’s business is global and some payments
21

may be made in local currency, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can impact its results by affecting product demand, revenues and expenses, and/or the profitability in U.S. Dollars of products and services that Varex provides in foreign markets.
    Changes in monetary or other policies here and abroad, including efforts to combat inflation, economic and/or political instability, or in reaction thereto, would also likely affect foreign currency exchange rates. Furthermore, if one or more European countries were to replace the Euro with another currency, Varex’s sales in these countries, or in Europe generally, would likely be materially and adversely affected until stable exchange rates are established.
    Additionally, fluctuations in commodities prices could materially and adversely affect Varex’s performance. Rising commodities prices have increased Varex’s costs and those of Varex’s medical OEM customers, which could in turn result in reduced demand for Varex’s products or impact Varex's financial results. Further, Varex’s security product revenues from oil-producing countries, in which Varex has a significant customer base, have in the past suffered as a result of volatility in oil prices and remain sensitive to fluctuations in the future.
Delivery schedules for Varex’s security, industrial, and inspection products tend to be unpredictable.

Varex designs, manufactures, sells, and services Linatron®Linatron® X-ray accelerators, image-processing software, and image detection products for security and inspection, such as cargo screening at ports and borders and nondestructive examination for a variety of applications, as well as industrial applications. Varex generally sells security and inspection products to OEMs who incorporate its products into their inspection systems, which are then sold to customs and other government agencies, as well as to commercial organizations in the casting, power, aerospace, chemical, petro-chemical, and automotive industries. Varex believes growth in its security and inspection products will be driven by security cargo screening and border protection needs, as well as by the needs of customs agencies to verify shipments for assessing duties and taxes. This business is heavily influenced by domestic and international government policies on border and port security, political change, and government budgets. In addition, Varex believes growth in this product line may be driven in part by industrial customers engaged in 3-D printing, which, as a developing market, may be difficult to predict. Orders for Varex’s security and inspection products have been and may continue to be unpredictable, as governmental agencies may place large orders with Varex or its OEM customers in a short time period and then may not place any orders for a long time period thereafter. Because it is difficult to predict Varex’s OEM customer delivery, the actual timing of sales and revenue recognition varies significantly. The market for border protection systems has slowed significantly, and end customers, particularly in oil-based economies and war zones in which Varex has a significant customer base, are delaying system deployments or tenders and considering moving to alternative sources, resulting in a decline in the demand for security and inspection products.

The demand for Varex’s security and inspection products is heavily influenced by U.S. and foreign governmental policies on national and homeland security, border protection, and customs activities, which depend upon government budgets and appropriations that are subject to economic conditions, as well as political changes and oil prices. Varex has seen customers freeze or dramatically reduce purchases and capital project expenditures, delay projects, or act cautiously as governments around the world wrestle with spending priorities. As economic growth remains sluggish in various jurisdictions and appears to be deteriorating in others, and as concerns about levels of government employment and government debt continue, Varex expects that these effects will also continue. Bid awards in this business may be subject to challenge by third parties, as Varex has previously encountered with a large government project. These factors make this business more unpredictable and could cause volatility in Varex’s revenues and earnings.

Varex’s international manufacturing operations subject it to volatility and other risks, including high security risks, which could result in harm to its employees and contractors or substantial costs.
Varex conducts certain manufacturing operations internationally to reduce costs and streamline its manufacturing operations. There are administrative, legal, and governmental risks to operating internationally that could increase operating expenses or hamper the development of these operations. The risks from operating internationally that could increase Varex’s operating expenses and

materially and adversely affect its operating results, financial condition, and ability to deliver its products and grow its business include, among others:

difficulties in staffing and managing employee relations and foreign operations, particularly in attracting and retaining personnel qualified to design, sell, test, and support its products;
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
difficulties in coordinating its operations globally and in maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures, and policies across its operations;
difficulties in enforcing contracts and protecting intellectual property;
diversion of management attention;
22

imposition of burdensome governmental regulations, including changing laws and regulations with respect to collection and maintenance of personally identifiable data;
regional and country-specific political and economic instability, as discussed in greater detail below; and
inadequacy of the local infrastructure to support its operations.
Varex’s international locations expose it to higher security risks compared to its United States locations, which could result in both harm to its employees and contractors or substantial costs. Some of its services are performed in or adjacent to high-risk locations where the country or location and surrounding area is suffering from political, social, or economic turmoil, war or civil unrest, or has a high level of criminal or terrorist activity. In those locations where Varex has employees or operations, Varex may incur substantial costs to maintain the safety of its personnel. Despite these precautions, the safety of its personnel in these locations may continue to be at risk, and Varex may in the future suffer the loss of employees and contractors, which could harm its business reputation and operating results.
Varex’s competitive position would be harmed if it is not able to maintain its intellectual property rights and protecting Varex’s intellectual property can be costly.

Varex files applications as appropriate for patents covering new products and manufacturing processes. Varex cannot be sure, however, that patents will be issued from any of Varex’s pending or future patent applications. Varex also cannot be sure that its current patents, the claims allowed under its current patents, or patents for technologies licensed to Varex will be sufficiently broad to protect its technology position against competitors. Issued patents owned by, or licensed to, Varex may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or the rights granted under the patents may not provide Varex with competitive advantages. Asserting Varex’s patent rights against others in litigation or other legal proceedings is costly and diverts managerial resources. For example, during fiscal year 2019, Varex initiated litigation asserting claims of patent infringement against a third party. Varex intends to prosecute its claims vigorously, and Varex has experienced, and will continue to experience, increased legal expenses related to this litigation that could adversely affect its financial results. An adverse finding in this or similar patent infringement litigation could adversely impact Varex’s competitive position. In addition, Varex may not be able to detect patent infringement by others or may lose its competitive position in the market before Varex is able to do so.
Varex also relies on a combination of copyright, trade secret, and other laws, and contractual restrictions on disclosure, copying and transferring title (including confidentiality agreements with vendors, strategic partners, co-developers, employees, consultants, and other third parties), to protect its proprietary, and other confidential rights. These protections may prove to be inadequate, since agreements may still be breached, and Varex may not have adequate remedies for a breach. Varex’s trade secrets may become known to or be independently developed by others, including as a result of misappropriation by unauthorized access to Varex’s technology systems. If Varex’s proprietary or confidential information is misappropriated, its business and financial results could be materially and adversely impacted. Varex has trademarks, both registered and unregistered, that are maintained and enforced to provide customer recognition for its products in the marketplace, but unauthorized parties may still use them. Varex also licenses certain patented or proprietary technologies from others. In some cases, products with substantial revenues may depend on these license rights. If Varex were to lose the rights to license these technologies, or its costs to license these technologies were to materially increase, its business would suffer. As Varex expands its manufacturing capabilities outside of the United States, more of Varex’s intellectual property may be held in jurisdictions that do not have robust intellectual property protections, which may make it harder for Varex to adequately protect its Intellectual Property.
Third parties may claim that Varex is infringing upon their intellectual property, and Varex could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling its products.
There is a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights in the industries in which Varex competes. Varex’s competitors, like companies in many high technology businesses, continually review other companies’ activities for

possible conflicts with their own intellectual property rights. In addition, non-practicing entities may review Varex’s activities for conflicts with their patent rights. Determining whether a product infringes on a party’s intellectual property rights involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome of this type of litigation is often uncertain. Parties may claim that Varex is infringing upon their intellectual property rights. Varex may not be aware of intellectual property rights of others that relate to its products, services, or technologies. From time to time, Varex has received notices from parties asserting infringement, and Varex has been subject to lawsuits alleging infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights. Any dispute regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time consuming and could divert Varex’s management and key personnel from its business operations. Varex may not prevail in a dispute. Varex does not maintain insurance for intellectual property infringement, so costs of defense, whether or not Varex is successful in defending an infringement claim, will be borne by Varex and could be significant. If Varex is unsuccessful in defending or appealing an infringement claim, Varex may be subject to significant damages, and its combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Varex may also be subject to injunctions against development and sale of its products, the effect of which could be to materially reduce its revenues. Furthermore, a third party claiming infringement may not be willing to license its rights to Varex, and even if a third-party rights holder is willing to do so, the amounts Varex might be required to pay under the associated royalty or license agreement could be significant. Varex could decide to alter its business strategy or voluntarily cease the allegedly infringing actions rather than face litigation or pay a royalty, which could materially and adversely impact its business and results of operations.
Product defects or misuse may result in material product liability or professional errors and omissions claims, litigation, investigation by regulatory authorities, or product recalls that could harm Varex’s future revenues and require it to pay material uninsured claims.
Varex’s business exposes it to potential product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacture, sale, installation, servicing, and support of components that are used in medical devices and other devices that deliver radiation. Because Varex’s products, through incorporation in OEMs’ systems, are involved in the intentional delivery of radiation to the human body and other situations where people may come into contact with radiation (for example, when Varex’s security and inspection products are being used to scan cargo or in the diagnosis of medical problems), the possibility for significant personal injury or loss of life exists. Although Varex’s products are incorporated into OEMs’ systems, and thus only perform pursuant to the design and operating systems of OEMs, Varex may also be subject to claims for property damage, personal injury, or economic loss related to or resulting from any errors or defects in its products or the installation, servicing, or support of its products. Any accident or mistreatment could subject Varex to legal costs, litigation, adverse publicity, and damage to its reputation, whether or not its products or services were a factor.
If Varex’s X-ray inspection systems fail to detect the presence of bombs, explosives, weapons, contraband, or other threats to personal safety, Varex could be subject to product and other liability claims or negative publicity, which could result in increased costs, reduced sales, and a decline in the market price of Varex’s common stock. There are many factors beyond Varex’s control that could result in the failure of its products to detect the presence of bombs, explosives, weapons, contraband, or other threats to personal safety, including operator error and misuse of or malfunction of Varex equipment. The failure of Varex’s systems to detect the presence of these dangerous materials may lead to personal injury, loss of life, and extensive property damage and may result in potential claims against Varex.
Product liability actions are subject to uncertainty and may be expensive, time consuming, and disruptive to Varex’s operations. For these and other reasons, Varex may choose to settle product liability claims against it regardless of their actual merit. A product liability action determined against Varex could result in adverse publicity or significant damages, including the possibility of punitive damages, and Varex’s combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
If a product Varex designs or manufactures were defective (whether due to design, labeling or manufacturing defects, improper use of the product, or other reasons), Varex may be required to correct or recall the product and notify regulatory authorities. The adverse publicity resulting from a correction or recall could damage Varex’s reputation and cause customers to review and potentially terminate their relationships with Varex. A product correction or recall could consume management time and have an adverse financial impact on its business, including incurring substantial costs, losing revenues, and accruing losses.
Varex maintains limited product liability insurance coverage. Varex’s product liability insurance policies are expensive and have high deductible amounts and self-insured retentions. Varex’s insurance coverage may prove to be inadequate, and future policies may not be available on acceptable terms or in sufficient amounts, if at all. If a material claim is not insured or is in excess of Varex’s insurance coverage, Varex could have to pay substantial damages, which could have a material and adverse effect on its financial position and/or results of operations.

Certain of Varex’s products are subject to regulations relating to use of radioactive material, compliance with which may be costly, and a failure to comply therewith may materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
As a manufacturer and seller of medical devices and devices emitting radiation or utilizing radioactive by-product material, Varex and some of its suppliers and distributors are subject to extensive regulation by United States governmental authorities, such as the FDA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), and state and local regulatory agencies, which is intended to ensure the devices are safe and effective and comply with laws governing products which emit, produce, or control radiation. These regulations govern, among other things, the design, development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, import/export, sale, and marketing and disposal of Varex’s products. Varex is also subject to international laws and regulations that apply to manufacturers of radiation-emitting devices and products utilizing radioactive materials. These are often comparable to, if not more stringent than, the equivalent regulations in the United States.
Varex’s industrial and medical devices utilizing radioactive material are subject to NRC clearance and approval requirements, and the manufacture and sale of these products are subject to extensive federal and state regulation that varies from state to state and among regions. Varex’s manufacture, distribution, installation, service, and removal of industrial devices utilizing radioactive material or emitting radiation also requires Varex to obtain a number of licenses and certifications for these devices and materials. Service of these products must also be in accordance with a specific radioactive materials licenses. Obtaining licenses and certifications may be time consuming, expensive, and uncertain.
The handling and disposal of radioactive materials resulting from the manufacture, use, or disposal of Varex’s products may impose significant costs and requirements. Disposal sites for the lawful disposal of materials generated by the manufacture, use, or decommissioning of Varex’s products may no longer accept these substances in the future or may accept them on unfavorable terms.
If Varex is unable to obtain required FDA clearances or approvals for a product or is unduly delayed in doing so, or the uses of that product were limited, Varex’s business could suffer.
Typically, Varex’s OEM customers are responsible for obtaining 510(k) pre-market notification clearance on their systems that integrate Varex products. A substantial majority of Varex’s products are “Class I” devices that do not require 510(k) clearance, but Varex does produce software that is classified as a Class II device subject to 510(k) clearance. Unless an exception applies, Varex may be required by FDA regulations to obtain a 510(k) pre-market notification clearance in connection with the manufacture of a new medical device or a new indication for use of, or other significant change in, an existing currently marketed medical device before it can market or sell those products in the United States. Modifications or enhancements to a product that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, technology, materials, labeling, packaging, or manufacturing process also require a new 510(k) clearance. Although manufacturers make the initial determination whether a change to a cleared device requires a new 510(k) clearance, Varex cannot ensure that the FDA will agree with its decisions not to seek additional approvals or clearances for particular modifications to its products or that Varex will be successful in obtaining new 510(k) clearances for modifications. Obtaining clearances or approvals is time consuming, expensive, and uncertain. Varex may not be able to obtain the necessary clearances or approvals or may be unduly delayed in doing so, which could harm its business. Furthermore, even if Varex is granted regulatory clearances or approvals, they may include significant limitations on the indicated uses of the product, which may limit the market for the product. If Varex is unable to obtain required FDA clearance or approval for a product or is unduly delayed in doing so, or the uses of that product were limited, Varex’s business could suffer.
Disruption of critical information systems or material breaches in the security of Varex’s systems may materially and adversely affect its business and customer relations.
Information technology (including technology from third party providers) helps Varex operate efficiently, interface with and support its customers, maintain financial accuracy and efficiency, and produce its financial statements. In the ordinary course of its business, Varex collects, processes and stores sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and that of customers, suppliers and business partners, third parties accessing its website, patient data and personally identifiable information of customers and employees, in Varex’s data centers, and on its networks, as well as third party off-site infrastructure. Despite security measures, there is an increasing threat of information security attacks, including from computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts, and cyber-attacks that pose risks to companies, including Varex. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, change frequently, have become increasingly sophisticated and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, Varex may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures, which could result in data leaks or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and disrupt our operations. If Varex does not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure, Varex could be subject to, among other things, transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers,

business disruptions, or the loss of or damage to intellectual property through a security breach or misappropriation of intellectual property. Such security breaches could expose Varex to a risk of loss of information, litigation, and possible liability to employees, customers, and/or regulatory authorities. If Varex’s data management systems do not effectively collect, secure, store, process, and report relevant data for the operation of its business, whether due to equipment malfunction or constraints, software deficiencies, or human error, Varex’s ability to effectively plan, forecast, and execute its business plan and comply with applicable laws and regulations will be impaired, perhaps materially. Any such impairment could materially and adversely affect Varex’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the timeliness with which Varex reports its operating results internally and externally.
Varex uses certain cloud-based software. A security breach, whether of Varex’s products, of Varex’s customers’ network security and systems, or of third-party hosting services could disrupt access to Varex’s customers’ stored information and could lead to the loss of, damage to or public disclosure of Varex’s customers’ stored information, including patient health information. Such an event could have serious negative consequences, including possible patient injury, regulatory action, fines, penalties and damages, reduced demand for Varex’s solutions, an unwillingness of its customers to use its solutions, harm to its reputation and brand, and time-consuming and expensive litigation, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s financial results.
Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could materially and adversely affect Varex’s financial results.
From time to time, Varex is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims, government inspections, audits or investigations, and other legal matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. Legal proceedings are often lengthy, taking place over a period of years with interim motions or judgments subject to multiple levels of review (such as appeals or rehearings) before the outcome is final. Litigation and other legal proceedings, claims, government inspections, audits and investigations are subject to significant uncertainty and may be expensive, time consuming, and disruptive to Varex’s operations. For these and other reasons, Varex may choose to settle legal proceedings and claims, regardless of their actual merit.
If a legal proceeding were ultimately resolved against Varex, it could result in significant compensatory damages, and, in certain circumstances, punitive damages, disgorgement of revenue or profits, remedial corporate measures, or injunctive relief imposed on Varex. If Varex’s existing insurance does not cover the amount or types of damages awarded, or if other resolution or actions taken as a result of such legal proceeding were to restrain its ability to market one or more of its material products or services, its combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, legal proceedings, and any adverse resolution thereof, can result in adverse publicity and damage to Varex’s reputation, which could materially and adversely impact its business.
Varex’s business may suffer if it is not able to hire and retain qualified personnel.
Varex’s future success depends, to a great degree, on its ability to retain, attract, expand, integrate, and train its management team and other key personnel, such as qualified engineering, service, sales, marketing, and other staff. Varex competes for key personnel with other medical equipment and software manufacturers and technology companies, as well as universities and research institutions. Because this competition is intense, particularly in Utah, where unemployment rates are relatively low, compensation-related costs could increase significantly if the supply of qualified personnel decreases or demand increases. If Varex is unable to hire and train qualified personnel, Varex may not be able to maintain or expand its business. Additionally, if Varex is unable to retain key personnel, Varex may not be able to replace them readily or on terms that are reasonable, which also could hurt its business.
Changes in interpretation or application of generally accepted accounting principles may materially and adversely affect Varex’s operating results.
Varex prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These principles are subject to interpretation by the FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the SEC, and various other regulatory and/or accounting bodies. A change in interpretations of, or its application of, these principles can have a significant effect on Varex’s reported results and may even affect its reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced. In addition, when Varex is required to adopt new accounting standards, Varex’s methods of accounting for certain items may change, which could cause its results of operations to fluctuate from period to period and make it more difficult to compare its financial results to prior periods.
As its operations evolve over time, Varex may introduce new products and/or new technologies that require Varex to apply different accounting principles, including ones regarding revenue recognition, than Varex has applied in past periods. The application of different types of accounting principles and related potential changes may make it more difficult to compare its financial results from quarter to quarter, and the trading price of Varex common stock could suffer or become more volatile as a result.

Environmental laws impose compliance costs on Varex’s business and may also result in liability.
Varex is subject to environmental laws around the world. These laws regulate many aspects of its operations, including its handling, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous substances, such as the chemicals and materials that Varex uses in the course of its manufacturing operations. They can also impose cleanup liabilities, including with respect to discontinued operations. As a consequence, Varex can incur significant environmental costs and liabilities, some recurring and others not recurring. Although its follows procedures intended to comply with existing environmental laws, Varex, like other businesses, may mishandle or inadequately manage hazardous substances used in its manufacturing operations and can never completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from certain materials that it uses in its business and, therefore, it cannot completely eliminate the prospect of resulting claims and damage payments. Varex may also be assessed fines and/or other penalties for failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations. Insurance has provided coverage for portions of cleanup costs resulting from historical occurrences, but Varex does not expect to maintain insurance coverage for costs or claims that might result from any future contamination.
Future changes in environmental laws could also increase its costs of doing business, perhaps significantly. Several countries, including some in the EU, now require medical equipment manufacturers to bear certain disposal costs of products at the end of the product’s useful life, increasing its costs. The EU has also adopted directives that may lead to restrictions on the use of certain hazardous substances or other regulated substances in some of its products sold there. These directives, along with another that requires substance information to be provided upon request, could increase Varex’s operating costs in order to maintain its access to certain markets. All of these costs, and any future violations or liabilities under environmental laws or regulations, could have a material adverse effect on its business.
Varex’s operations are vulnerable to interruption or loss due to natural or other disasters, power loss, strikes, and other events beyond its control.

Varex conducts some of its activities, including manufacturing, research and development, administration, and data processing at facilities located in areas that have in the past experienced or may in the future experience natural disasters. Varex’s insurance coverage for such disasters may not be adequate or continue to be available at commercially-reasonable terms, or at all. A major disaster (such as a major fire, hurricane, earthquake, flood, tsunami, volcanic eruption or terrorist attack) affecting Varex’s facilities, or those of its suppliers, could significantly disrupt its operations and delay or prevent product manufacture and shipment during the time required to repair, rebuild, or replace its or its suppliers’ damaged manufacturing facilities. These delays could be lengthy and costly. If any of Varex’s customers’ facilities are adversely affected by a disaster, shipments of its products could be delayed. Additionally, customers may delay purchases of Varex’s products until its operations return to normal. For example, following the earthquake and tsunami disasters in Japan in 2011, the operations of Canon Medical Systems, our largest customer, were impacted, and, as a consequence, orders to and product shipment from our business were delayed for several months. Even if Varex's suppliers or customers are able to quickly respond to a disaster, the ongoing effects of the disaster could create some uncertainty in the operations of its business. In addition, Varex’s facilities may be subject to a shortage of available electrical power and other energy supplies. Any shortages may increase its costs for power and energy supplies or could result in blackouts, which could disrupt the operations of its affected facilities and harm its business. Further, Varex’s products are typically shipped from a limited number of ports, and any disaster, strike, or other event blocking shipment from these ports could delay or prevent shipments and harm its business. In addition, concerns about terrorism, the effects of a terrorist attack, political turmoil, or an outbreak of epidemic diseases could have a negative effect on Varex’s business operations, those of its suppliers and customers, and the ability to travel, resulting in adverse consequences on its revenues and financial performance.

Risks Relating to our Intellectual Property and Information Systems

Varex’s competitive position would be harmed if it is not able to maintain its intellectual property rights and protecting Varex’s intellectual property can be costly.
    Varex files applications as appropriate for patents covering new products and manufacturing processes. Varex cannot be sure, however, that patents will be issued from any of Varex’s pending or future patent applications. Varex also cannot be sure that its current patents, the claims allowed under its current patents, or patents for technologies licensed to Varex will be sufficiently broad to protect its technology position against competitors. Issued patents owned by, or licensed to, Varex may be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or the rights granted under the patents may not provide Varex with competitive advantages. Asserting Varex’s patent rights against others in litigation or other legal proceedings is costly and diverts managerial resources. For example, during fiscal year 2019, Varex initiated litigation asserting claims of patent infringement against a third party. Varex intends to prosecute its claims vigorously, and Varex has experienced, and will continue to experience, increased legal expenses related to this litigation that could adversely affect its financial results. An adverse finding in this or similar patent infringement litigation could adversely impact Varex’s competitive position. In addition, Varex may not be able to detect patent infringement by others or may lose its competitive position in the market before Varex is able to do so.
    Varex also relies on a combination of copyright, trade secret, and other laws, and contractual restrictions on disclosure, copying and transferring title (including confidentiality agreements with vendors, strategic partners, co-developers, employees, consultants, and other third parties), to protect its proprietary, and other confidential rights. These protections may prove to be inadequate, since agreements may still be breached, and Varex may not have adequate remedies for a breach. Varex’s trade secrets may become known to or be independently developed by others, including as a result of misappropriation by unauthorized access to Varex’s technology systems. If Varex’s proprietary or confidential information is misappropriated, its business and financial results
23

could be materially and adversely impacted. Varex has trademarks, both registered and unregistered, that are maintained and enforced to provide customer recognition for its products in the marketplace, but unauthorized parties may still use them. Varex also licenses certain patented or proprietary technologies from others. In some cases, products with substantial revenues may depend on these license rights. If Varex were to lose the rights to license these technologies, or its costs to license these technologies were to materially increase, its business would suffer. As Varex expands its manufacturing capabilities outside of the United States, more of Varex’s intellectual property may be held in jurisdictions that do not have robust intellectual property protections, which may make it harder for Varex to adequately protect its intellectual property.

Third parties may claim that Varex is infringing upon their intellectual property, and Varex could suffer significant litigation or licensing expenses or be prevented from selling its products.
    There is a substantial amount of litigation over patent and other intellectual property rights in the industries in which Varex competes. Varex’s competitors, like companies in many high technology businesses, continually review other companies’ activities for possible conflicts with their own intellectual property rights. In addition, non-practicing entities may review Varex’s activities for conflicts with their patent rights. Determining whether a product infringes on a party’s intellectual property rights involves complex legal and factual issues, and the outcome of this type of litigation is often uncertain. Parties may claim that Varex is infringing upon their intellectual property rights. Varex may not be aware of intellectual property rights of others that relate to its products, services, or technologies. From time to time, Varex has received notices from parties asserting infringement, and Varex has been subject to lawsuits alleging infringement of patent or other intellectual property rights. Any dispute regarding patents or other intellectual property could be costly and time consuming and could divert Varex’s management and key personnel from its business operations. Varex may not prevail in a dispute. Varex does not maintain insurance for intellectual property infringement, so costs of defense, whether or not Varex is successful in defending an infringement claim, will be borne by Varex and could be significant. If Varex is unsuccessful in defending or appealing an infringement claim, Varex may be subject to significant damages, and its combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Varex may also be subject to injunctions against development and sale of its products, the effect of which could be to materially reduce its revenues. Furthermore, a third party claiming infringement may not be willing to license its rights to Varex, and even if a third-party rights holder is willing to do so, the amounts Varex might be required to pay under the associated royalty or license agreement could be significant. Varex could decide to alter its business strategy or voluntarily cease the allegedly infringing actions rather than face litigation or pay a royalty, which could materially and adversely impact its business and results of operations.

Disruption of critical information systems or material breaches in the security of Varex’s systems may materially and adversely affect its business and customer relations.
    Information technology (including technology from third-party providers) helps Varex operate efficiently, interface with and support its customers, maintain financial accuracy and efficiency, and produce its financial statements. In the ordinary course of its business, Varex collects, processes and stores sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information and that of customers, suppliers and business partners, third parties accessing its website, patient data and personally identifiable information of customers and employees, in Varex’s data centers, and on its networks, as well as third party off-site infrastructure. Despite security measures, there is an increasing threat of information security attacks, including from computer viruses or other malicious codes, unauthorized access attempts, and cyber-attacks that pose risks to companies, including Varex. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage systems, change frequently, have become increasingly sophisticated and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, Varex may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures, which could result in data leaks or otherwise compromise our confidential or proprietary information and disrupt our operations. If Varex does not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper technology infrastructure, Varex could be subject to, among other things, transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, the loss of customers, business disruptions, or the loss of or damage to intellectual property through a security breach or misappropriation of intellectual property. Such security breaches could expose Varex to a risk of loss of information, litigation, and possible liability to employees, customers, and/or regulatory authorities. If Varex’s data management systems do not effectively collect, secure, store, process, and report relevant data for the operation of its business, whether due to equipment malfunction or constraints, software deficiencies, or human error, Varex’s ability to effectively plan, forecast, and execute its business plan and comply with applicable laws and regulations will be impaired, perhaps materially. Any such impairment could materially and adversely affect Varex’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the timeliness with which Varex reports its operating results internally and externally.
    Varex uses certain cloud-based software. A security breach, whether of Varex’s products, of Varex’s customers’ network security and systems, or of third-party hosting services could disrupt access to Varex’s customers’ stored information and could lead to the loss of, damage to or public disclosure of Varex’s customers’ stored information, including patient health information. Such an event could have serious negative consequences, including possible patient injury, regulatory action, fines, penalties and damages,
24

reduced demand for Varex’s solutions, an unwillingness of its customers to use its solutions, harm to its reputation and brand, and time-consuming and expensive litigation, any of which could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s financial results.

Risks Relating to Our Legal and Regulatory Environment

Changes in import/export regulatory regimes and tariffs could continue to negatively impact our business.
    Tariffs and changes in international trade agreements or trade-related laws and regulations may have an indirect adverse impact on our business. As a component manufacturer, our products are integrated into the systems and products of our OEM customers. If the United States, China or other countries levy tariffs, duties or other additional taxes or restrictions on our customer’s products, the demand for such products, and our components included in such products, could decrease, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Uncertainty over tariffs and trade wars could also cause our customers to delay or cancel orders for our products.
    In recent years, the United States has imposed tariffs on items imported from China that are incorporated into our products. Tariffs on items imported by us from China and other countries have increased our costs and has increased prices and lowered gross margins on some of our products. These tariffs have had a direct adverse impact on our business and results of operations, and future tariffs could have a more significant impact on our business. China has imposed retaliatory tariffs that impact a number of Varex products including U.S. origin X-ray tubes, heat exchange units, and certain flat panel detectors. The tariffs levied by China have increased our customers’ costs for products imported into China, which has caused us to make price concessions on some products and has caused some customers to stop purchasing products from us. We expect that tariffs will continue to have a negative effect on our business and results of operations, including the possibility of continued price concessions or loss of business. Tariffs could limit our ability to compete for increased market share in China, which could cause our long-term prospects in China to suffer. The imposition of additional tariffs by the United States could result in the adoption of additional tariffs by China and other countries, as well as further retaliatory actions by any affected country, which could negatively impact the global market for imaging equipment and could have a significant adverse effect on our business.

Compliance with foreign laws and regulations applicable to the marketing, manufacture, and distribution of Varex’s products may be costly, and failure to comply may result in significant penalties and other harm to Varex’s business.
    Regulatory requirements affecting Varex’s operations and sales outside the United States vary from country to country, often differing significantly from those in the United States. In general, outside the United States, some of Varex’s products are regulated as medical devices by foreign governmental agencies similar to the FDA.
    For Varex to market its products internationally, Varex must obtain clearances or approvals for products and product modifications. These processes (including, for example, in the EU, the European Economic Area (“EEA”), Switzerland, Brazil, Australia, China, Japan and Canada) can be time consuming, expensive and uncertain, which can delay Varex’s ability to market products in those countries. Delays in the receipt of or failure to receive regulatory approvals, the inclusion of significant limitations on the indicated uses of a product, the loss of previously obtained approvals or failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements could restrict or prevent Varex from doing business in a country or subject Varex to a variety of enforcement actions and civil or criminal penalties, which would materially and adversely affect its business. In addition, compliance with changing regulatory schemes may add additional complexity, cost and delays in marketing or selling Varex’s products.
    Within the EU/EEA, Varex must obtain, and in turn affix, a CE mark certification, which is a European marking of conformity that indicates that a product meets the essential requirements of the Medical Device Directive. Compliance with the Medical Device Directive is done through a self-certification process that is then verified by an independent certification body called a “Notified Body,” which is an organization empowered by the legislature to conduct this verification. Once the CE mark is affixed, the Notified Body will regularly audit Varex to ensure that it remains in compliance with the applicable European laws and Medical Device Directive. By affixing the CE mark to its product, Varex is certifying that its products comply with the laws and regulations required by the EU/EEA countries, thereby allowing the free movement of its products within these countries and others that accept CE mark standards. If Varex cannot support its performance claims and demonstrate compliance with the applicable European laws and the Medical Device Directive, Varex would lose its right to affix the CE mark to its products, which would prevent Varex from selling its products within the EU/EEA/Switzerland territory and in other countries that recognize the CE mark. In April 2017, the European Commission adopted two new regulations on medical devices. These new regulations impose stricter requirements for placing medical devices in the EU market, as well as for Notified Bodies. These new regulations have resulted in the limited availability of recognized Notified Bodies, which could delay our ability to obtaining CE marks. Varex may be subject to risks associated with additional testing, modification, certification, or amendment of its existing market authorizations, or Varex may be
25

required to modify products already installed at its customers’ facilities to comply with the official interpretations of these revised regulations.
    Varex is also subject to international laws and regulations of general applicability relating to matters such as environmental protection, safe working conditions, and manufacturing practices, as well as others. These are often comparable to, if not more stringent than, the equivalent regulations in the United States. Sales overseas are also affected by regulation of matters such as product standards, packaging, labeling, environmental and product recycling requirements, import and export restrictions, tariffs, duties, and taxes.
    In addition, Varex is required to timely file various reports with international regulatory authorities similar to the reports it is required to timely file with U.S. regulatory authorities, including reports required by international adverse event reporting regulations. If these reports are not timely filed, regulators may impose sanctions, including temporarily suspending Varex’s market authorizations or CE mark, and sales of its products may suffer.
    Further, as Varex enters new businesses or pursues new business opportunities internationally, or as regulatory schemes change, Varex may become subject to additional laws, rules, and regulations. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations is costly. Additionally, in some countries, Varex relies or may rely in the future on foreign distributors and agents to assist in complying with foreign regulatory requirements, and Varex cannot be sure that they will always do so. The failure of Varex or its agents to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could delay the introduction of new products, cause reputational harm, or result in investigations, fines, injunctions, civil penalties, criminal prosecution, or an inability to sell Varex’s products in or to import its products into certain countries, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
Compliance with U.S. laws and regulations applicable to the marketing, manufacture, and distribution of Varex’s products may be costly, and failure or delays in obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could prevent Varex from distributing its products, require Varex to recall its products, or result in significant penalties or other harm to Varex’s business.
    Some of Varex’s products and those of OEMs that incorporate Varex’s products are subject to extensive and rigorous government regulation in the United States. Compliance with these laws and regulations is expensive and time-consuming, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
    Generally, Varex’s manufacturing operations for medical devices, and those of its third-party manufacturers, are required to comply with the Quality System Regulations (“QSR”) of the FDA, as well as other federal and state regulations for medical devices and radiation-emitting products. The FDA makes announced and unannounced periodic and on-going inspections of medical device manufacturers to determine compliance with QSR and, in connection with these inspections, issues reports known as Form FDA 483 reports when the FDA believes the manufacturer has failed to comply with applicable regulations and/or procedures. If observations from the FDA issued on Form FDA 483 reports are not addressed and/or corrective action is not taken in a timely manner and to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA may issue a warning letter and/or proceed directly to other forms of enforcement action. Similarly, if a warning letter were issued, prompt corrective action to come into compliance would be required. Failure to respond in a timely manner to Form FDA 483 observations, a warning letter, or any other notice of noncompliance and to promptly come into compliance could result in the FDA bringing an enforcement action, which could include the total shutdown of Varex’s production facilities, denial of importation rights to the United States for products manufactured in overseas locations, adverse publicity, and criminal and civil fines. The expense and costs of any corrective actions that Varex may take, which may include product recalls, correction and removal of products from customer sites, and/or changes to its product manufacturing and quality systems, could materially and adversely impact Varex’s financial results and may also divert management resources, attention, and time. Additionally, if a warning letter were issued, customers could delay purchasing decisions or cancel orders, and Varex could face increased pressure from its competitors, who could use the warning letter against Varex in competitive sales situations, either of which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s reputation, business, and stock price.
    In addition, Varex is required to timely file various reports with the FDA, including reports required by the medical device reporting regulations (“MDRs”), that require Varex report to regulatory authorities if its devices may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. If Varex initiates a correction or removal of a device to reduce a risk to health posed by the device, Varex would be required to submit a publicly-available correction and removal report to the FDA and, in many cases, similar reports to other regulatory agencies. This report could be classified by the FDA as a device recall, which could lead to increased scrutiny by the FDA, other international regulatory agencies, and Varex’s customers regarding the quality and safety of Varex’s devices. If these MDRs or
26

correction and removal reports are not filed on a timely basis, regulators may impose sanctions, sales of Varex’s products may suffer, and Varex may be subject to product liability or regulatory enforcement actions, all of which could harm its business.
    Government regulation may also cause significant delays or even prevent the marketing and full commercialization of future products or services that Varex may develop and/or may impose costly requirements on Varex’s business. Further, as Varex enters new businesses or pursues new business opportunities, Varex will become subject to additional laws, rules, and regulations, including FDA and foreign rules and regulations. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations is costly and time consuming. In addition, failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could delay the introduction of new products and could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
    If Varex or any of its suppliers, distributors, agents, or customers fail to comply with FDA, Federal Trade Commission, or other applicable U.S. regulatory requirements or are perceived to have failed to comply with regulations, Varex may face:
adverse publicity affecting both Varex and its customers;
increased pressures from competitors;
investigations by governmental authorities;
fines, injunctions, civil penalties, and criminal prosecution;
partial suspension or total shutdown of production facilities or the imposition of operating restrictions;
increased difficulty in obtaining required clearances or approvals or losses of clearances or approvals already granted;
seizures or recalls of Varex products or those of its customers;
delays in purchasing decisions by customers or cancellation of existing orders;
the inability to sell Varex products; and
difficulty in obtaining product liability or operating insurance at a reasonable cost, or at all.
    Varex is also subject to federal and state laws and regulations of general applicability relating to matters such as environmental protection, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, and other matters. Insurance coverage is not commercially available for violations of law, including the fines, penalties, or investigatory costs that Varex may incur as the consequence of regulatory violations. Consequently, Varex does not have insurance that would cover this type of liability.
Varex sells certain X-ray tube products as replacements which are subject to medical device certification and product registration laws and regulations, which vary by country and are subject to change, and Varex may be unable to receive registration approval or renewal of existing registrations if it fails to meet regulatory approval requirements or if the approval process becomes commercially infeasible or impractical.
    Varex markets and distributes certain X-ray tubes through distributors and third-party/multi-vendor service organizations that are used as equivalent replacements for specific OEM tubes. Varex is subject to medical device certification and product registration laws, which vary by country and are subject to periodic reviews and changes by regulatory authorities in those countries. For example, to sell X-ray tubes for replacement applications in China, product registrations must be approved by the new National Medical Products Administration (“NMPA”). Varex must comply with the requirements of the NMPA, and Varex may not be able to receive registration approval or renewal of existing registrations if it fails to meet regulatory approval requirements or if the process of gaining approval becomes commercially infeasible or impractical. Certain of these local laws and regulations have the effect of serving as a barrier to trade and can be difficult to navigate predictably.
    In addition, certain countries in which Varex products are sold require products to undergo re-registration if the product is altered in any significant way.
    These registration processes can be costly and time consuming, and customers may decide to purchase products from Varex’s competitors that do not have to be involved in a re-registration process. In addition, Varex’s inability to receive or renew product registrations may prevent Varex from marketing and/or distributing those particular products for replacement applications in the specific country.
Existing and future healthcare reforms may indirectly have a material adverse effect on Varex’s business and results of operations.
    Sales of Varex’s products to OEMs in the medical sector indirectly depend on whether adequate reimbursement is available for its customers’ products from a variety of sources, such as government healthcare insurance programs, including U.S. Medicare and Medicaid programs, foreign government programs, private insurance plans, health maintenance organizations, and preferred provider
27

organizations. Without adequate reimbursement, the demand for Varex’s customers’ products, and therefore indirectly Varex’s products, may be limited.
    Healthcare reform proposals and medical cost containment measures in the United States and in many foreign countries could limit the use of both Varex’s and its customers’ products, reduce reimbursement available for such use, further tax the sale or use of Varex’s products, and further increase the administrative and financial burden of compliance. These reforms and measures, including the uncertainty in the medical community regarding their nature and effect, could have a material and adverse effect on Varex’s and its customers’ purchasing decisions regarding its products and treatments and could harm Varex’s business, results of operations, financial condition, and prospects. Varex cannot predict the specific healthcare programs and regulations that will be ultimately implemented by local, regional, and national governments globally. However, any changes that lower reimbursements for Varex’s or its customers’ products and/or procedures using these products, including, for example, existing reimbursement incentives to convert from analog to digital X-ray systems, or changes that reduce medical procedure volumes or increase cost containment pressures on Varex or others in the healthcare sector could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and results of operations.
Varex is subject to federal, state, and foreign laws governing its business practices which, if violated, could result in substantial penalties. Additionally, challenges to or investigations into Varex’s practices could cause adverse publicity and be costly to respond to and thus could harm its business.
Anti-corruption laws and regulations. Varex is subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-corruption laws, as well as similar laws in foreign countries, such as the U.K. Bribery Act and the Law On the Fundamentals of Health Protection in the Russian Federation. In general, there is a worldwide trend to strengthen anti-corruption laws and their enforcement, and the healthcare industry and medical equipment manufacturers have been particular targets of these investigation and enforcement efforts. Any violation of these laws by Varex or its agents or distributors could create substantial liability for Varex, subject its officers and directors to personal liability, and cause a loss of reputation in the market. Varex operates in many countries, including India and China, where the public sector is perceived as being corrupt. Varex’s strategic business plans include expanding its business in regions and countries that are rated as higher risk for corruption activity by Transparency International e.V., an international non-profit that publishes an annual corruption perception index. Becoming familiar with and implementing the infrastructure necessary to comply with laws, rules, and regulations applicable to new business activities and mitigating and protecting against corruption risks could be costly. Failure by Varex or its agents or distributors to comply with these laws, rules, and regulations could delay its expansion into high-growth markets and could materially and adversely affect its business. Varex will likely do more business, directly and potentially indirectly, in countries where the public sector is perceived to be corrupt. Increased business in higher-risk countries could subject Varex and its officers and directors to increased scrutiny and increased liability from its business operations.
Competition and trade compliance laws. Varex is subject to various competition and trade compliance laws in the jurisdictions where it operates. Regulatory authorities in those jurisdictions may have the power to subject Varex to sanctions and impose changes or conditions in the way Varex conducts its business. An increasing number of jurisdictions provide private rights of action for competitors or consumers to assert claims of anti-competitive conduct and seek damages. Increased government scrutiny of Varex’s actions or enforcement or private rights of action could materially and adversely affect its business or damage its reputation. Varex may be required to conduct internal investigations or face audits or investigations by one or more domestic or foreign government agencies, which could be costly and time consuming and could divert its management and key personnel from its business operations. An adverse outcome under any such investigation or audit could subject Varex to fines and/or or criminal or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business and financial results. Furthermore, competition laws may prohibit or increase the cost of future acquisitions that Varex may desire to undertake.
Laws and ethical rules governing interactions with healthcare providers. Varex does not generally sell its products directly to healthcare providers, but may occasionally sell its products to healthcare providers through distributors. The U.S. Medicare and Medicaid “anti-kickback” laws, and similar state laws, prohibit payments or other remuneration that is intended to induce hospitals, physicians, or others either to refer patients or to purchase, lease, or order, or to arrange for or recommend the purchase, lease, or order of healthcare products or services for which payment may be made under federal and state healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid. These laws affect Varex’s sales, marketing, and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements Varex may have with hospitals, physicians, or other potential purchasers of its products. They particularly impact how Varex structures its sales offerings, including discount practices, customer support, education and training programs, physician consulting, research grants, and other fee-for-service arrangements. These laws are broadly written, and it is often difficult to determine precisely how these laws will be applied to specific circumstances.
    Federal and state “false claims” laws generally prohibit knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other government payors that are false or fraudulent, or for items or services that were not provided as
28

claimed. Although Varex does not submit claims directly to payors, manufacturers can be, and have been, held liable under these laws if they are deemed to “cause” the submission of false or fraudulent claims by providing inaccurate billing or coding information to customers or through certain other activities, including promoting products for uses not approved or cleared by the FDA, which is called off-label promotion. Violating “anti-kickback” and “false claims” laws can result in civil and criminal penalties, which can be substantial, as well as potential mandatory or discretionary exclusion from healthcare programs for noncompliance. Even an unsuccessful challenge or investigation into Varex’s practices could cause adverse publicity and be costly to defend and thus could harm its business and results of operations. Additionally, several recently-enacted state and federal laws, including laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, and the federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act, now require, among other things, extensive tracking and maintenance of databases regarding the disclosure of equity ownership and payments to physicians, healthcare providers, and hospitals. These laws may require Varex to implement the necessary and costly infrastructure to track and report certain payments to healthcare providers. Failure to comply with these new tracking and reporting laws could subject Varex to significant civil monetary penalties.
    Varex is subject to similar laws in foreign countries where it conducts business. For example, within the EU, the control of unlawful marketing activities is a matter of national law in each of the member states. The member states of the EU closely monitor perceived unlawful marketing activity by companies. Varex could face civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions if any member state determines that Varex has breached its obligations under such state’s national laws. Industry associations also closely monitor the activities of member companies. If these organizations or authorities name Varex as having breached its obligations under their regulations, rules, or standards, its reputation would suffer, and its business and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Certain of Varex’s products are subject to regulations relating to use of radioactive material, compliance with which may be costly, and a failure to comply therewith may materially and adversely affect Varex’s business.
    As a manufacturer and seller of medical devices and devices emitting radiation or utilizing radioactive by-product material, Varex and some of its suppliers and distributors are subject to extensive regulation by United States governmental authorities, such as the FDA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”), and state and local regulatory agencies, which is intended to ensure the devices are safe and effective and comply with laws governing products which emit, produce, or control radiation. These regulations govern, among other things, the design, development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution, import/export, sale, and marketing and disposal of Varex’s products. Varex is also subject to international laws and regulations that apply to manufacturers of radiation-emitting devices and products utilizing radioactive materials. These are often comparable to, if not more stringent than, the equivalent regulations in the United States.
    Varex’s industrial and medical devices utilizing radioactive material are subject to NRC clearance and approval requirements, and the manufacture and sale of these products are subject to extensive federal and state regulation that varies from state to state and among regions. Varex’s manufacture, distribution, installation, service, and removal of industrial devices utilizing radioactive material or emitting radiation also requires Varex to obtain a number of licenses and certifications for these devices and materials. Service of these products must also be in accordance with a specific radioactive materials licenses. Obtaining licenses and certifications may be time consuming, expensive, and uncertain.
    The handling and disposal of radioactive materials resulting from the manufacture, use, or disposal of Varex’s products may impose significant costs and requirements. Disposal sites for the lawful disposal of materials generated by the manufacture, use, or decommissioning of Varex’s products may no longer accept these substances in the future or may accept them on unfavorable terms.
If Varex is unable to obtain required FDA clearances or approvals for a product or is unduly delayed in doing so, or the uses of that product were limited, Varex’s business could suffer.
    Typically, Varex’s OEM customers are responsible for obtaining 510(k) pre-market notification clearance on their systems that integrate Varex products. A substantial majority of Varex’s products are “Class I” devices that do not require 510(k) clearance, but Varex does produce software that is classified as a Class II device subject to 510(k) clearance. Unless an exception applies, Varex may be required by FDA regulations to obtain a 510(k) pre-market notification clearance in connection with the manufacture of a new medical device or a new indication for use of, or other significant change in, an existing currently marketed medical device before it can market or sell those products in the United States. Modifications or enhancements to a product that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in the intended use of the device, technology, materials, labeling, packaging, or manufacturing process also require a new 510(k) clearance. Although manufacturers make the initial determination whether a change to a cleared device requires a new 510(k) clearance, Varex cannot ensure that the FDA will agree with its decisions not to seek additional approvals or clearances for particular modifications to its products or that Varex will be successful in obtaining
29

new 510(k) clearances for modifications. Obtaining clearances or approvals is time consuming, expensive, and uncertain. Varex may not be able to obtain the necessary clearances or approvals or may be unduly delayed in doing so, which could harm its business. Furthermore, even if Varex is granted regulatory clearances or approvals, they may include significant limitations on the indicated uses of the product, which may limit the market for the product. If Varex is unable to obtain required FDA clearance or approval for a product or is unduly delayed in doing so, or the uses of that product were limited, Varex’s business could suffer.
Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could materially and adversely affect Varex’s financial results.
    From time to time, Varex is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims, government inspections, audits or investigations, and other legal matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. Legal proceedings are often lengthy, taking place over a period of years with interim motions or judgments subject to multiple levels of review (such as appeals or rehearings) before the outcome is final. Litigation and other legal proceedings, claims, government inspections, audits and investigations are subject to significant uncertainty and may be expensive, time consuming, and disruptive to Varex’s operations. For these and other reasons, Varex may choose to settle legal proceedings and claims, regardless of their actual merit.
    If a legal proceeding were ultimately resolved against Varex, it could result in significant compensatory damages, and, in certain circumstances, punitive damages, disgorgement of revenue or profits, remedial corporate measures, or injunctive relief imposed on Varex. If Varex’s existing insurance does not cover the amount or types of damages awarded, or if other resolution or actions taken as a result of such legal proceeding were to restrain its ability to market one or more of its material products or services, its combined financial position, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, legal proceedings, and any adverse resolution thereof, can result in adverse publicity and damage to Varex’s reputation, which could materially and adversely impact its business.
Environmental laws impose compliance costs on Varex’s business and may also result in liability.
    Varex is subject to environmental laws around the world. These laws regulate many aspects of its operations, including its handling, storage, transport, and disposal of hazardous substances, such as the chemicals and materials that Varex uses in the course of its manufacturing operations. They can also impose cleanup liabilities, including with respect to discontinued operations. As a consequence, Varex can incur significant environmental costs and liabilities, some recurring and others not recurring. Although it follows procedures intended to comply with existing environmental laws, Varex, like other businesses, may mishandle or inadequately manage hazardous substances used in its manufacturing operations and can never completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from certain materials that it uses in its business and, therefore, it cannot completely eliminate the prospect of resulting claims and damage payments. Varex may also be assessed fines and/or other penalties for failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations. Insurance has provided coverage for portions of cleanup costs resulting from historical occurrences, but Varex does not expect to maintain insurance coverage for costs or claims that might result from any future contamination.
    Future changes in environmental laws could also increase its costs of doing business, perhaps significantly. Several countries, including some in the EU, now require medical equipment manufacturers to bear certain disposal costs of products at the end of the product’s useful life, increasing its costs. The EU has also adopted directives that may lead to restrictions on the use of certain hazardous substances or other regulated substances in some of its products sold there. These directives, along with another that requires substance information to be provided upon request, could increase Varex’s operating costs in order to maintain its access to certain markets. All of these costs, and any future violations or liabilities under environmental laws or regulations, could have a material adverse effect on its business.
Fulfilling obligations incidental to being a public company place significant demands on Varex’s management, administrative, and operational resources, including accounting and information technology resources.
    As a public company, Varex is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and is required to prepare its financial statements according to the rules and regulations required by the SEC. The Exchange Act requires that Varex file annual, quarterly, and current reports. Varex’s failure to prepare and disclose this information in a timely manner or to otherwise comply with applicable law could subject it to penalties under federal securities laws, cause it to be out of compliance with applicable stock exchange listing requirements, and expose it to lawsuits and restrict its ability to access financing. For example, as a result of the delayed filing of our 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq advising us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements. While we promptly regained compliance with the Nasdaq listing requirements, if we had failed to regain compliance in a timely manner, it would have negatively impacted Varex.
30

    Varex must, among other things, establish and maintain effective internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and disclosure purposes. Internal control over financial reporting is complex and may be revised over time to adapt to changes in Varex’s business or changes in applicable accounting rules. Varex cannot assure that its internal control over financial reporting will be effective in the future or that material weaknesses will not be discovered with respect to a prior period for which it had previously believed that internal controls were effective.
    Matters impacting Varex’s internal controls may cause Varex to be unable to report its financial information on a timely basis or may cause Varex to restate previously-issued financial information, thereby subjecting Varex to adverse regulatory consequences, including sanctions or investigations by the SEC or in respect of violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in Varex and the reliability of its financial statements, which could affect Varex’s stock price.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Varex has significant debt obligations that could adversely affect its business, profitability and ability to meet its obligations.
    As of October 1, 2021, Varex’s total combined indebtedness was approximately $480.6 million. The borrowings under Varex’s unsecured convertible senior notes due 2025 (the “Convertible Notes”) bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.00% and borrowings under Varex’s Senior Secured Notes due 2027 (the “Senior Secured Notes”) bear interest at a fixed rate of 7.875%.
    Varex's debt could potentially have important consequences to Varex and its investors, including:

limiting Varex’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry; and
limiting Varex’s ability to borrow additional funds as needed or increasing the costs of any such borrowing.
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations, including our debt obligations;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and general industry conditions, including interest rate fluctuations, because a portion of our borrowings are and will continue to be at variable rates of interest;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, which would reduce the availability of our cash flow from operations to fund working capital, capital expenditures or other general corporate purposes;
place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors that may have proportionately less debt; and
limit our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing due to applicable financial and restrictive covenants in our debt agreements.
    If Varex’s cash requirements in the future are greater than expected, its cash flow from operations may not be sufficient to repay all of the outstanding debt as it becomes due, and Varex may not be able to borrow money, sell assets, or otherwise raise funds on acceptable terms, or at all, to refinance Varex’s debt. For example, holders of the Convertible Notes will have the right to require Varex to repurchase all or a portion of the Convertible Notes on the occurrence of a fundamental change at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. Further, if a make-whole fundamental change as defined in the Indenture governing the Convertible Notes occurs prior to the maturity date of the Convertible Notes, Varex will in some cases be required to increase the conversion rate for a holder that elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change. On the conversion of the Convertible Notes, unless Varex elects to deliver solely shares of common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), Varex will be required to make cash payments for the Convertible Notes being converted. However, Varex may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time Varex is required to make such repurchases of the Convertible Notes surrendered or pay cash with respect to the Convertible Notes being converted.

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more debt. This could intensify the risks described above.
    We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial indebtedness in the future. As of October 1, 2021, we had approximately $100 million of additional available borrowing capacity (subject to borrowing base availability) under the revolving credit agreement that we entered into on September 30, 2020 (the “Asset-Based Loan”, or "ABL Facility"). In addition to any amounts that might be available to us for borrowing under the ABL Facility, subject to certain conditions, we will have the right to request an increase of aggregate commitments under the ABL Facility by an aggregate amount of up to $75 million by obtaining additional commitments either from one or more of the lenders under the ABL Facility or other lending institutions.
31

    Although the ABL Facility and the indenture governing our Senior Secured Notes contain restrictions on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Furthermore, the covenants in the indenture governing our Convertible Notes do not restrict the incurrence of indebtedness by the company or any of its subsidiaries, and the covenants that may be contained in any future debt instruments could allow us to incur a significant amount of additional indebtedness.
    The more leveraged we become, the more we, and in turn holders of our notes, will be exposed to certain risks described above under “— Varex has significant debt obligations that could adversely affect its business, profitability and ability to meet its obligations.”

The ABL Facility and the indenture governing our Senior Secured Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions that may limit our current and future operating flexibility, particularly our ability to respond to changes in the economy or our industry or to take certain actions, which could harm our long term interests and may limit our ability to make payments on the notes.
    Our ABL Facility and the indenture governing our Senior Secured Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us.

These restrictions limit our ability, among other things, to:
incur, assume or permit to exist additional indebtedness (including guarantees thereof);
pay dividends or certain other distributions on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock or prepay subordinated indebtedness;
prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
issue certain preferred stock or similar equity securities;
incur liens on assets;
make certain loans, investments or other restricted payments;
allow to exist certain restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to us;
engage in transactions with affiliates;
alter the business that we conduct; and
sell certain assets or merge or consolidate with or into other companies.

As a result of these restrictions, we may be:
limited in how we conduct our business;
unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or
unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.
    A breach of the covenants under the indenture governing our Senior Secured Notes or the ABL Facility could result in an event of default under the applicable indebtedness. Such a default, if not cured or waived, may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt that is subject to an applicable cross-acceleration or cross-default provision. In addition, an event of default under the ABL Facility would permit the lenders under the ABL Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under the ABL Facility. Furthermore, if we were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the ABL Facility, those lenders could proceed against the collateral securing such indebtedness. In the event our lenders or holders of the notes offered hereby accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we and our subsidiaries may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness.

Our ability to continue to have the necessary liquidity to operate our business may be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including uncertain conditions in the credit and financial markets, which could limit the availability and increase the cost of financing. A deterioration of our results of operations and cash flow resulting from decreases in consumer spending, could, among other things, impact our ability to comply with the fixed charge coverage ratio contained in our ABL Facility.
    Our historical sources of liquidity to fund ongoing cash requirements include cash flows from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings through our previous credit facility and convertible debt offerings. The sufficiency and availability of credit may be adversely affected by a variety of factors, including, without limitation, the tightening of the credit markets, including lending by financial institutions who are sources of credit for our borrowing and liquidity; an increase in the cost of capital; the reduced availability of credit; our ability to execute our strategy; the level of our cash flows, which will be impacted by customer demand for our products; compliance with a fixed charge coverage ratio that is included in our ABL Facility, interest rate fluctuations and the adverse impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the U.S. and world-wide economies and on our business. We cannot predict the future
32

level of interest rates or the effect of any increase in interest rates on the availability or aggregate cost of our borrowings. We cannot be certain that any additional required financing, whether debt or equity, will be available in amounts needed or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
    The ABL Facility contains a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 that is tested when excess availability under the ABL is less than the greater of (i) 10.0% of the Loan Cap (the lesser of (a) the aggregate commitments under the ABL Facility and (b) the aggregate borrowing base) and (ii) $7.5 million. If we have to borrow in excess of 10.0% of the Loan Cap and $7.5 million, and we do not increase our earnings, we also would be at risk of not being in compliance with the ABL Facility’s fixed charge coverage ratio. Compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio is dependent on the results of our operations, which are subject to a number of factors including current economic conditions. Adverse developments in the economy, including as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, could lead to reduced spending by our customers and end-users which could adversely impact our net sales and cash flow, which could affect our ability to comply with the fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition, the ABL Facility contains other affirmative and negative covenants that restrict Varex’s operating and financing activities. These provisions may limit our ability to, among other things, incur future indebtedness, contingent obligations or liens, guarantee indebtedness, make certain investments and capital expenditures, sell stock or assets, pay dividends and consummate certain mergers or acquisitions. Failure to comply with the fixed charge coverage ratio and other covenants, including the requirement to timely deliver financial statements within applicable grace periods, could result in an event of default. Upon an event of default, if the ABL Facility is not amended or the event of default is not waived, the lender could declare all amounts then outstanding, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, Varex may not be able to make those payments or borrow sufficient funds from alternative sources to make those payments. Even if Varex were to obtain additional financing, that financing may be on unfavorable terms.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness, which may not be successful.
    If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures, or to sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness, including the notes. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. If our operating results and available cash are insufficient to meet our debt service obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them, and these proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. Any future refinancing of our indebtedness could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants which could further restrict our business operations. Additionally, the Indenture will limit the use of the proceeds from any disposition of our assets. As a result, the Indenture may prevent us from using the proceeds from such dispositions to satisfy our debt service obligations.

Our credit rating and ability to access well-functioning capital markets are important to our ability to secure future debt financing on acceptable terms. Our credit ratings may not reflect all risks associated with an investment in our secured notes.
    Our access to the debt markets and the terms of such access depend on multiple factors including the condition of the debt capital markets, our operating performance and our credit ratings. These ratings are based on a number of factors including an assessment of our financial strength and financial policies. Our borrowing costs will be dependent to some extent on the rating assigned to our debt. However, there can be no assurance that any particular rating assigned to us will remain in effect for any given period of time or that a rating will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating so warrant. Incurrence of additional debt by us could adversely affect our credit rating. Any disruptions or turmoil in the capital markets or any downgrade of our credit rating could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity, competitive position and access to capital markets, which could materially and adversely affect our business operations, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading would likely have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

Varex entered into certain hedging positions that may affect the value of the Convertible Notes and the volatility and value of Varex’s common stock.
    In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, Varex entered into certain convertible note hedge transactions. These hedge transactions are expected generally to reduce potential dilution of our common stock on any conversion of the Convertible Notes or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of such converted Convertible Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction or offset subject to a cap. The counterparties to these hedging positions or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to Varex’s common stock or purchasing or selling Varex’s common stock in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the
33

Convertible Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of Convertible Notes or following any repurchase of Convertible Notes by Varex on any fundamental change repurchase date or otherwise). This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of Varex common stock or the Convertible Notes. In addition, if any such hedging positions fail to become effective, the counterparties to these hedging positions or their respective affiliates may unwind their hedge positions, which could adversely affect the value of Varex common stock.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

The trading price of Varex’s common stock may decline or fluctuate significantly and fluctuations in Varex’s operating results, including quarterly revenues, and margins, may cause its stock price to be volatile, which could cause losses for its stockholders.
    In the past year, Varex's stock price has ranged from a low of $11.96 to a high of $29.95. Varex cannot guarantee that an active trading market will be sustained for its common stock. Nor can Varex predict the prices at which shares of its common stock may trade. Varex has experienced and expects in the future to experience fluctuations in its operating results, including revenues and margins, from period to period. These fluctuations may cause Varex’s stock price to be volatile, which could cause losses for its stockholders.
    Varex’s quarterly and annual operating results, including its revenues and margins, may be affected by a number of other factors, including:

the introduction and timing of announcement of new products or product enhancements by Varex and its competitors;
changes in its or its competitors’ pricing or discount levels;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other economic uncertainty;
changes in import/export regulatory regimes including the imposition of tariffs on our products or those of our customers;
changes in the relative portion of its revenues represented by its various products, including the relative mix between higher margin and lower-margin products;
changes in the relative portion of its revenues represented by its international region as a whole and by regions within the overall region, as well as by individual countries (notably, those in emerging markets);
fluctuation in its effective tax rate, which may or may not be known to Varex in advance;
the availability of economic stimulus packages or other government funding, or reductions thereof;
disruptions in the supply or changes in the costs of raw materials, labor, product components or transportation services;
changes to its organizational structure, which may result in restructuring or other charges;
disruptions in its operations, including its ability to manufacture products, caused by events such as earthquakes, fires, floods, terrorist attacks or the outbreak of epidemic diseases;
the unfavorable outcome of any litigation or administrative proceeding or inquiry, including governmental audits, as well as ongoing costs associated with legal proceedings and governmental audits; and
accounting changes and adoption of new accounting pronouncements.
    Because many of Varex’s operating expenses are based on anticipated capacity levels, and a high percentage of these expenses are fixed for the short term, a small variation in the timing of revenue recognition can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter. If Varex’s gross margins fall below the expectation of securities analysts and investors, the trading price of Varex common stock may decline.

Conversion of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interest of Varex’s stockholders or may otherwise depress the market price of Varex’s common stock.
    The conversion of the Convertible Notes may dilute the ownership interests of Varex’s stockholders. On conversion of the Convertible Notes, Varex has the option to pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of common stock. If Varex elects to settle our conversion obligation in shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock, any sales of Varex common stock issuable on such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of Varex’s common stock. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Convertible Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the Convertible Notes into shares of Varex’s common stock, any of which could depress the market price of Varex’s common stock.

The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
34

    In the event the conditions for optional conversion of the Convertible Notes by holders are met before the close of business on the business day immediately preceding June 1, 2025, holders of the Convertible Notes will be entitled to convert the Convertible Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If Varex elects to satisfy our conversion obligation by settling all or a portion of its conversion obligation in cash, it could adversely affect Varex’s liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Convertible Notes, Varex could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Convertible Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of Varex net working capital and may seriously harm Varex’s business.

Certain provisions in Varex’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, andits Amended and Restated Bylaws, its Indenture, and of Delaware law, may prevent or delay an acquisition of Varex, which could decrease the trading price of Varex’s common stock.
Varex’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws contain, and Delaware law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with Varex’s board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. These provisions include, among others:
the inability of Varex’s stockholders to call a special meeting;
the inability of Varex’s stockholders to act without a meeting of stockholders;
rules regarding how stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings;
the right of Varex’s board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval; and,

the division of Varex’s board of directors into three classes of directors, with each class serving a staggered three-year term, and this classified board provision could have the effect of making the replacement of incumbent directors more time-consuming and difficult, until the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, after which directors will be elected annually;
a provision that stockholders may only remove directors with cause while the board is classified;
the ability of Varex’s directors, and not stockholders, to fill vacancies on Varex’s board of directors; and,directors.
the requirement that the affirmative vote of stockholders holding at least 66 2/3% of Varex’s voting stock is required to amend certain provisions in Varex’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (relating to the term and removal of its directors, the filling of its board vacancies, the calling of special meetings of stockholders, stockholder action by written consent, the elimination of liability of directors to the extent permitted by Delaware law and indemnification of directors and officers), although this requirement will expire on the completion of the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, after which Varex's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation may be amended by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding voting stock.
In addition, because Varex did not elect to be exempt from Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), this provision could also delay or prevent a change of control that stockholders may favor. Section 203 provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that acquire, or who are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15% of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation (an “interested stockholder”) shall not engage in any business combination with that corporation, including by merger, consolidation, or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year period following the date on which the person became an interested stockholder, unless: (1) prior to such time, the board of directors of such corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (2) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of such corporation at the time the transaction commenced; or (3) on or subsequent to such time the business combination is approved by the board of directors of such corporation and authorized at a meeting of stockholders by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock of such corporation not owned by the interested stockholder.
Varex believes these provisions will protect its stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with Varex’s board of directors and by providing Varex’s board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal.    These provisions are not intended to make Varex immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that Varex’s board of directors determines is not in the best interests of Varex and Varex’s stockholders. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.
Potential indemnification    Furthermore, certain provisions in Varex’s Indenture governing the Convertible Notes may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire Varex. For example, the Indenture requires Varex, at the holders’ election, to repurchase the Convertible Notes for cash on the occurrence of a fundamental change and, in certain circumstances, to increase the conversion rate for a holder that converts its Convertible Notes in connection with a make-whole fundamental change. A takeover of Varex may trigger the requirement that we repurchase the Convertible Notes or increase the conversion rate, which could make it costlier for a third party to acquire Varex. Varex’s Indenture also prohibits Varex from engaging in a merger or acquisition unless, among other things, the surviving entity assumes the obligations under the Convertible Notes and Varex’s Indenture. These and other provisions in Varex’s Indenture could deter or prevent a third party from acquiring Varex even when the acquisition may be favorable to holders of the Convertible Notes or Varex’s stockholders.

Liabilities related to Varex’s operations when it was part of Varian, or liabilities toassociated with its spin-off from Varian, could materially and adversely affect Varex’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Varex entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement when it spun off from Varian. The agreement provides for, among other things, indemnification obligations designed to make Varian financially responsible for liabilities allocable to Varian before the spin-off, and to make Varex financially responsible for anyliabilities allocable to Varex liabilities;before the failure of Varex to pay, perform, or otherwise promptly discharge any Varex liabilities or contracts in accordance with their respective terms; any guarantee, indemnification obligation, surety bond or other credit support agreement, arrangement, commitment, or understanding by Varianspin-off and for the benefit of Varex, unless related to Varian liabilities; any breach by Varex of the Separation and Distribution Agreement or any of the ancillary agreements; any action by Varex in contravention of its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or Amended and Restated Bylaws; and, any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or omission or alleged omission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, with respect to all information contained in the Registration Statement on Form 10 (as amended or supplemented) or any other disclosure documentVarex registration statement that describes the separation, the distribution, Varex, and its subsidiaries, or the transactions contemplated by the Separation
35

and Distribution Agreement, subject to certain exceptions. If Varex is required to indemnify Varian under the circumstances set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement,Agreement. Varex may be subject to substantial liabilities.
In connection with Varex’s spin-off from Varian, Varian has agreedliabilities if it required to indemnify Varex for certain liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that the indemnity will be sufficient to insure Varex against the full amount of such liabilitiesVarian or that Varian’s ability to satisfy its indemnification obligation will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the Separation and Distribution Agreement and certain other agreements withif Varian Varian agreedis required, but unable, to indemnify Varex for certain liabilities. However, third parties could also seek to hold Varex responsible for anyVarex. Either of the liabilities that Varian retained, and there can be no assurance that the indemnity from Varian will be sufficient to protect Varex against the full amount of such liabilities or that Varian will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. In addition, Varian’s insurers may attempt to deny coverage to Varex for liabilities associated with certain occurrences of indemnified liabilities prior to the separation. Moreover,

even if Varex ultimately succeeds in recovering from Varian or such insurance providers any amounts for which Varex is held liable, Varex may be temporarily required to bear these losses. Each of these risks could negatively affect Varex’s business, financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows.
Potential liabilities may arise due to fraudulent transfer considerations, which could materially and adversely affect Varex’s financial condition and its results of operations.
In connection with the spin-off, Varian completed several corporate restructuring transactions, which, along with the separation and distribution, may be subject to federal and state fraudulent conveyance and transfer laws. If, under these laws, a court were to determine that, at the time of the separation and distribution, any entity involved in these restructuring transactions or the separation and distribution:
was insolvent;
was rendered insolvent by reason of the separation and distribution;
had remaining assets constituting unreasonably small capital; or,
intended to incur, or believed it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay these debts as they matured,
then the court could void the separation and distribution, in whole or in part, as a fraudulent conveyance or transfer. The court could then require Varex’s stockholders to return to Varian some or all of the shares of Varex common stock issued in the distribution or require Varian or Varex, as the case may be, to fund liabilities of the other company for the benefit of creditors. The measure of insolvency will vary depending upon the jurisdiction whose law is being applied. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if the fair value of its assets was less than the amount of its liabilities or if it incurred debt beyond its ability to repay the debt as it matures.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our businesscorporate headquarters is primarily located in Salt Lake City, Utah, where we own approximately 37 acres of land and approximately 494,000 square feet of space used for manufacturing, administrative functions and research and development, for both our Medical and Industrial segments. We also own or lease 34 other facilities throughout North America, Europe and Asia (located in 8 states and 17 foreign countries) that comprise over 21.6 million square feet of manufacturing facilities, warehouses, sales and service, research and development and office space, which are used for our Medical and/or Industrial segments, depending on the location.
In addition to our location in Salt Lake City, Utah, our other primary owned facilities are located in Las Vegas, Nevada andNevada; Franklin Park, Illinois.Illinois; and Doetinchem, the Netherlands. Our Las Vegas, Nevada facility has approximately 5 acres of land and 94,000 square feet of space used for manufacturing, administrative functions and research and development, for our Industrial segments.segment. Our Franklin Park, Illinois, facility has approximately 3 acres of land and approximately 61,000 square feet of space used for manufacturing, administrative functions and research and development, for both our Medical and Industrial segments. Our Doetinchem, Netherlands, facility is approximately 4 acres and approximately 290,000 square feet of space used for manufacturing, engineering, administrative functions, and research and development, for our Medical and Industrial segments.
Primary leased facilities include approximately 144,000288,000 square feet in Laguna, Philippines, approximately 73,000 square feet in Santa Clara, California, approximately 46,000 square feet in Wuxi, China, approximately 47,000 square feet in Dinxperlo, the Netherlands, approximately 34,000 square feet in Bremen, Germany, and approximately 34,000 of square feet in Walluf, Germany and approximately 39,000 square feet in San Jose, California, all of which are used for manufacturing and administrative functions for our Medical and Industrial segments.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time    We are subject to time, we are involved invarious claims, complaints and legal proceedings arisingactions in the ordinarynormal course of business or otherwise.from time to time. We do not believe thatwe have any currently pending litigation for which the outcome could have a material liability will be imposed as a result of these matters. If actual liabilities significantly exceed the estimates made,adverse effect on our combinedoperations or financial position, results of operations, comprehensive earnings or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Legal expenses relating to legal matters are expensed as incurred.position. See “Risk Factors-Item 1A. "Risk Factors - Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could materially and adversely affect Varex's financial results."



Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.

36
33



PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Varex's common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (the “NASDAQ”) under the symbol “VREX.”
Since our inception, we have not paid any cash dividends and have no current plan to pay cash dividends on Varex common stock. As of November 18, 2019,8, 2021, there were 1,6621,436 holders of record of Varex common stock.
This graph shows the total return on VREX common stock since listing on NASDAQ on January 20, 2017, with comparative total returns for the Russell 2000 Index (“RUT”) and the Dow Jones Medical Equipment Index (“DJUSAM”). The graph below assumes that $100.00 was invested on January 20, 2017 in our common stock and the companies listed in the RUT and the DJUSAM, as well as a reinvestment of dividends paid on such investments throughout the period.
chart-60e2d95fbd6683f2865.jpgvrex-20211001_g2.jpg
Item 6. Selected Financial Data[Reserved]
In January 2017, we separated from Varian. Prior to the date of separation, the financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis and derived from Varian’s consolidated financial statements as we operated as part of Varian.
The following data, in so far as it relates to each of the fiscal years from 2015 through 2019, has been derived from annual consolidated financial statements, including the consolidated balance sheets at September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, of comprehensive earnings, and of cash flows for the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein. In addition, the following financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes and the MD&A included elsewhere herein.

34
37



Summary of Operations:Fiscal Years
(In millions, except per share amounts)2019 2018 
2017(1)
 2016 2015
Revenues$780.6
 $773.4
 $698.1
 $620.1
 $632.3
Gross margin$256.7
 $253.9
 $253.5
 $248.4
 $250.6
Earnings before taxes21.5
 25.7
 74.8
 105.0
 127.6
Taxes on earnings5.7
 (2.6) 22.8
 36.0
 46.8
Net earnings15.8
 28.3
 52.0
 69.0
 80.8
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests0.3
 0.8
 0.4
 0.5
 0.8
Net earnings attributable to Varex$15.5
 $27.5
 $51.6
 $68.5
 $80.0
Net earnings per share attributable to Varex         
Net earnings per share - basic$0.41
 $0.73
 $1.37
 $1.83
 $2.14
Net earnings per share - diluted$0.40
 $0.72
 $1.36
 $1.82
 $2.12
Financial Position at Fiscal Year End:         
Working capital$263.3
 $306.1
 $343.5
 $282.1
 $237.5
Total assets1,038.9
 987.9
 1,040.1
 622.4
 583.6
Total debt (excluding current maturities, net of deferred costs)364.4
 364.8
 464
 
 
(1)The summary of operations for fiscal year 2017 includes operating results from the Acquired Detector Business for the period from May 1, 2017 through September 29, 2017.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth selected financial data from our unaudited quarterly consolidated statements of earnings for the eight quarters ended fiscal year 2019. The information for each quarter has been derived from unaudited financial statements and in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited interim periods and includes certain reclassifications and rounding differences. The quarterly data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this annual report.
 
Fiscal Year 2019 (1)
(In millions, except per share amounts, unaudited)First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total Year
Total revenues$185.7
 $195.8
 $196.7
 $202.4
 $780.6
Gross margin$60.0
 $64.4
 $60.7
 $71.6
 $256.7
Net earnings$3.0
 $5.9
 $(1.3) $8.2
 $15.8
Net earnings attributable to Varex$3.0
 $5.8
 $(1.4) $8.1
 $15.5
Net earnings per share - basic$0.08
 $0.15
 $(0.04) $0.21
 $0.41
Net earnings per share - diluted$0.08
 $0.15
 $(0.04) $0.21
 $0.40

(1)During fiscal year 2019, the Company identified errors that originated in prior periods and were corrected for as out of period adjustments in the quarters of fiscal year 2019. Management has determined that such errors and out of period adjustments, which primarily related to inventory accounting, revenue recognition and intercompany transactions, were not material to any of the unaudited interim financial statements. The impact of these errors and out of period adjustments on total revenues, gross margin, net earnings and net earnings per diluted share was as follows:
Q1 2019 - $(0.6) million, $(1.1) million, $0.4 million and $0.01 per diluted share, respectively;
Q2 2019 - $0.1 million, $0.0 million, $(1.2) million and $(0.03) per diluted share respectively;
Q3 2019 -  $0.0 million, $(0.9) million, $(0.6) million and $(0.02) per diluted share respectively;
Q4 2019 - $0.0 million, $2.2 million, $1.6 million and $0.04 per diluted share, respectively.


 Fiscal Year 2018
(In millions, except per share amounts, unaudited)First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Total Year
Total revenues$176.2
 $201.2
 $191.2
 $204.8
 $773.4
Gross margin$61.5
 $70.1
 $63.0
 $59.3
 $253.9
Net earnings$11.4
 $12.3
 $3.9
 $0.7
 $28.3
Net earnings attributable to Varex$11.3
 $12.2
 $3.8
 $0.2
 $27.5
Net earnings per share - basic$0.30
 $0.32
 $0.10
 $0.01
 $0.73
Net earnings per share - diluted$0.30
 $0.32
 $0.10
 $0.01
 $0.72


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Basis of Presentation
We became an independent publicly-traded company    The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or our future financial or operating performance that involve risks and uncertainties, as set forth above under "Forward-Looking Statements." Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in January 2017 following our separation from Varian and subsequent distribution of shares of our common stock to Varian shareholders.
Prior to the spin-off, we operatedthese forward-looking statements as a divisionresult of Varian. Accordingly, for part of fiscal year 2017, certain shared costs have been allocated to us and are reflected as expensesfactors described in the accompanying financial statements. Management considers the allocation methodologies used to be reasonable and appropriate reflections of the related expenses attributable to us for purposes of the carve-out financial statements; however, the expenses reflected in these financial statements may not be indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred during the periods presented if we had operated as a separate stand-alone entity. The allocation methods include revenue, headcount, actual usage of services, and others. In addition, the expenses reflected in the financial statements may not be indicative of expenses that will be incurred by us in the future.this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Business
Varex Imaging Corporation is a leading innovator, designer and manufacturer of X-ray imaging components including X-ray tubes, digital detectors, linear accelerators and other image software processing solutions, which are keycritical components of a variety of X-ray based imaging systems. Our components are used in medical imaging as well as in industrial and security imaging applications. Global original equipment manufacturers (“OEM”) incorporate our X‑ray imaging components in their systems to detect, diagnose, protect and inspect. As of September 27, 2019, we had approximately 2,000 full-time equivalents employees, located at manufacturing and service center sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. 

Our products are sold in three geographic regions: the Americas, EMEA, and APAC. The Americas includes North America (primarily the United States) and Latin America. EMEA includes Europe, Russia, the Middle East, India and Africa. APAC includes Asia and Australia. Revenues by region are based on the known final destination of products sold.

equipment. Our success depends, among other things, on our ability to anticipate and respond to changes in our markets, the direction of technological innovation and the demands of our customers. For additional information on our business, see Part I, Item 1.

Impact of COVID-19 and the General Economic Environment
    The unprecedented nature of the COVID-19 pandemic and its effect on the global economy began to significantly disrupt our business in fiscal year 2020 by initially reducing demand for our products followed by strong recovery in demand but increasing variability in supply of raw materials and manufacturing productivity.
    During the twelve months ended October 1, 2021, demand for many of our products recovered to pre-pandemic levels and our business has continued to grow. We believe that demand for our products has increased due to increased investments in healthcare and diagnostics coupled with end-users (such as hospitals) making capital purchases that were previously deferred due to the uncertainty surrounding COVID-19. While we are encouraged by the recovery that we have seen, we remain cautious as many factors remain unpredictable.
We continue to invest in researchexperience logistic, supply chain, and development and employ over 500 engineers. Combining this focus on innovation and product performance with strong long-term customer relationships allows us to partner with our customers to bring industry-leading products tomanufacturing challenges that we expect will continue into 2022. As economies around the X-ray imaging market. Weworld continue to work to improverecover, shortages in raw materials have become more widespread. During the lifelatter half of fiscal year 2021, we have experienced shortages of certain materials and qualityhave used more of our imaginginventory on hand than we have used historically. Shortages of materials, particularly micro-controller chips and associated electronic components, have caused and leverage our scale as the largest X-ray imaging component suppliermay continue to provide cost-effective solutionscause, delays in manufacturing products for our customers. Demand forIn some cases, raw material shortages and delivery delays from our suppliers are communicated to us with very little advanced warning, which has caused operational and customer order fulfillment challenges. While we are dedicating significant resources to manage, mitigate, and resolve these issues, we currently expect supply chain challenges to continue to impact our ability to deliver products canto our customers over the next several quarters. Increased freight charges and shipping delays have also be impacted by geo-political factors, including tariffs on key imported materials used in manufacturing our products and also on X-ray imaging products we sell to customers outsidebecome more common over the United States. The escalation of trade conflicts between the United States and China has negatively impacted our businesslast few months and are expected to continue.continue into the foreseeable future. Due to the rising cost environment, in addition to ongoing expense management, we have begun to raise prices on certain products. We anticipate to make pricing adjustments throughout fiscal year 2022.

    During the twelve months ended October 1, 2021, our manufacturing facilities continued to operate with minimal disruption. In accordance with government guidelines, we have modified certain COVID-19 related protocols, including social distancing and mask requirements. In the event COVID-19 cases continue an upward trajectory, we may be required to re-implement certain COVID-19 related precautions.
Operating Segments    The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and Products

Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), evaluates our product groupingsensuing supply chain challenges have and measureswill directly or indirectly impact us, including our business, performancefinancial condition, and results of operations, will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted. We will continue to actively monitor the situation and may take further actions that alter our business operations or that we determine are in two reportable operating segments: Medical and Industrial. The segments align our products and service offerings with customer use in medical and industrial markets and are consistent with how the CODM evaluates the business for the allocation of resources. The CODM allocates resources to and evaluates the financial performance of each operating segment primarily based on revenues and gross margin.
Medical

In our Medical business segment, we design, manufacture, sell and service X-ray imaging components for use in a range of radiographic or fluoroscopic imaging applications including, computed tomography (“CT”), mammography, oncology, cardiac, surgery, dental, and computer-aided detection. We provide a broad range of X-ray imaging components for Medical customers, including X-ray tubes, digital detectors, high voltage connectors, image-processing software and workstations, computer-aided diagnostic software, collimators, automatic exposure control devices, generators, heat exchangers, ionization chambers and buckys.

A significant portionbest interests of our revenues come fromemployees, customers, suppliers, and stockholders. For additional information on risks related to the sales of high-end X-ray tubes used in CT imagingpandemic and high-end dynamic digital detectors used in fluoroscopic and 3D dental imaging applications. These upper-tier imaging components are characterized by increased levels of technological complexity, engineering and intellectual propertyother supply chain risks that typically allow these products to have a higher sales price and gross margin.

The digital detector market continues to mature from initial product introductions that were made approximately 15 years ago. For the past few years, we have experienced price erosion for these products, predominantly in the highly-competitive market for radiographic detectors. We anticipate this trend will continue in the foreseeable future.

Our X-ray imaging components are primarily sold to OEM customers that incorporatecould impact our products into their X-ray imaging systems for a variety of medical modalities and industrial applications. To a much lesser extent, we also sell our X-ray imaging components to independent service companies, distributors and directly to end-users for replacement purposes.

In China, the government is broadening the availability of healthcare services throughout the country. As a result, the number of diagnostic X-ray imaging systems, including CT, has grown significantly. We are developing CT tubes and related subsystems for Chinese OEMs as they introduce new CT imaging systems in China. Over the long-term, we anticipate that China-based revenues will increase as a percentage of our revenues. For fiscal year 2019, revenues from X-ray imaging components shipped to China-based OEMs and distributors declined to approximately 8% of total company revenues from 10% in the prior year. This decrease reflects a tariff-related decline in sales of radiographic digital detectors in China as well as lower non-OEM aftermarket sales, which more than offset an increase in sales of CT tubes to OEM customers.

We have taken certain actions to help us mitigate the impact of the trade war between the United States and China. We have implemented changes to secure more non-China sources of supply of parts and materials used to manufacture our X-ray imaging products, and in September 2019, we received from the United States Trade Representative a temporary exclusion from Section 301 tariffs on certain parts and components imported from China into the United States. We continue to expand manufacturing capabilities at our facilities in China, Germany and the Philippines.
Industrial

results, see Part I, Item 1A - Risk Factors.
In our Industrial business segment, we design, manufacture, sell and service X-ray imaging products for use a number of markets, including security applications, such as cargo screening at ports and borders and baggage screening at airports, as well as nondestructive testing and inspection applications used in a number of other markets. Our industrial products include Linatron
® X-ray linear accelerators, X-ray tubes, digital detectors and high voltage connectors. In addition, we provide proprietary image-processing and detection software designed to work with these other Varex products to provide package solutions to our Industrial customers.

The security market primarily consists of airport security for carry-on baggage, checked baggage and palletized cargo, as well as cargo security for the screening of trucks, trains and cargo containers at ports and borders. The end customers for border protection systems are typically government agencies, many of which are in oil-based economies and war zones where there has been significant year over year variation in buying patterns.

The non-destructive testing market utilizes X-ray imaging to scan items for inspection of manufacturing defects and product integrity in a wide range of industries including the aerospace, automotive, oil and gas, food packaging, metal castings and 3D printing industries. We provide X-ray sources, digital detectors, high voltage connectors and image processing software to OEM customers, system integrators and manufacturers. In addition, new applications for X-ray sources are being developed, such as sterilization of food and its packaging.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year is the 52- or 53-week period ending on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2021 was the 52-week period that ended October 1, 2021, fiscal year 2020 was the 53-week period that ended October 2, 2020, and fiscal year 2019 was the 52-week period that ended September 27, 2019, fiscal year 2018 was the 52-week period that ended September 28, 2018, and fiscal year 2017 was the 52-week period ended September 29, 2017.2019. Set forth below is a discussion of our results of operations for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019.
38

Results of Operations
    Our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2020, filed November 30, 2020, includes a discussion and analysis of our year-over-year changes, financial condition, and results of operations for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 2018 and 2017.in Item 7 of Part II therein.


DiscussionComparison of Results of Operations for Fiscal Year 20192021 and 20182020
Revenues, net
Fiscal Years   
(In millions)2019 2018 $ Change % Change(In millions)2021% Change2020% Change2019
Medical$596.8
 $602.0
 $(5.2) (1)%Medical$643.8 10%$584.5 (2)%$596.8 
Industrial183.8
 171.4
 12.4
 7%Industrial174.3 13%153.8 (16)%183.8 
Total revenues, net$780.6
 $773.4
 $7.2
 1%Total revenues, net$818.1 11%$738.3 (5)%$780.6 
Medical as a percentage of total revenues76% 78%   Medical as a percentage of total revenues79 %79 %76 %
Industrial as a percentage of total revenues24% 22%   Industrial as a percentage of total revenues21 %21 %24 %
Medical revenues decreased $5.2increased $59.3 million primarily due to decreased sales of radiographic digital detectors in China and non-OEM aftermarket X-ray tubes, partially offset by increased sales of X-ray tubes and digital detectors and X-ray tubes for oncology, applications, OEM X-ray tubes for CT applicationsdental, mammography and the addition of revenues from the acquisition of Direct Conversion AB (publ) (“Direct Conversion”).radiographic applications.
Industrial revenues increased $12.4$20.5 million due to increased sales of X-ray tubes for airport security and digital detectors for
inspection applications and the addition of revenues with the acquisition of Direct Conversion.applications.

Revenues by Region
Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2019 2018 $ Change % Change(In millions)2021% Change2020% Change2019
Americas$282.6
 $275.8
 $6.8
 2 %Americas$268.5 5%$255.0 (10)%$282.6 
EMEA269.0
 254.5
 14.5
 6 %EMEA276.3 19%231.5 (14)%269.0 
APAC229.0
 243.1
 (14.1) (6)%APAC273.3 9%251.8 10%229.0 
Total revenues, net$780.6
 $773.4
 $7.2
 1 %Total revenues, net$818.1 11%$738.3 (5)%$780.6 
Americas as a percentage of total revenues36% 36%    Americas as a percentage of total revenues33 %35 %36 %
EMEA as a percentage of total revenues34% 33%    EMEA as a percentage of total revenues34 %31 %34 %
APAC as a percentage of total revenues29% 31%    APAC as a percentage of total revenues33 %34 %29 %
The Americas revenues increased $6.8$13.5 million primarily due to increased sales of X-ray tubes, partially offset by lower sales of digital detectors and computer-aided detection software. EMEA revenues increased $14.5$44.8 million primarily due to increased sales of digital detectors, the addition of revenues from the acquisition of Direct Conversion in April of 2019 and higher sales of high voltage cables, partially offset by lower sales ofand X-ray tubes. APAC revenues decreased $14.1increased $21.5 million primarily due to decreasedincreased sales of radiographic digital detectorsOEM X-ray tubes in China partially offset by the addition of revenues with the acquisition of Direct Conversion.
Gross Margin
 Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2019 2018 $ Change % Change
Medical$188.9
 $190.5
 $(1.6) (1)%
Industrial67.8
 63.4
 4.4
 7 %
Total gross margin$256.7
 $253.9
 $2.8
 1 %
Medical gross margin %31.7% 31.6%    
Industrial gross margin %36.9% 37.0%    
Total gross margin %32.9% 32.8%    
China.
Gross Profit
(In millions)2021% Change2020% Change2019
Medical$203.2 49%$136.4 (28)%$188.9 
Industrial68.3 27%53.8 (21)%67.8 
Total gross profit$271.5 43%$190.2 (26)%$256.7 
Medical gross margin32 %23 %32 %
Industrial gross margin39 %35 %37 %
Total gross margin33 %26 %33 %
    Gross margin percentage increased for fiscal year 20192021 compared to 2018.2020. The gross marginprofit for fiscal year 20192020 included $9.4$22.2 million of restructuring and product discontinuation charges and purchase price accounting adjustments and theadjustments. The medical segment gross margin forin 2021 increased primarily due to increased volumes of X-ray tubes and medical detectors, cost reduction actions undertaken in fiscal year 2018 included

$7.3 million of restructuring charges.2020, which have resulted in cost savings in fiscal year 2021, and favorable product mix. The industrial segment gross margin percentage decreasedin
39

Table of Contents
2021 increased primarily due to higher manufacturing costsvolumes of X-ray tubes for security applications and unfavorablenon-destructive testing, favorable product mix.mix, and cost reduction actions undertaken in fiscal year 2020, which have resulted in cost savings in fiscal year 2021.
Operating Expenses
Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2019 2018 $ Change % Change(In millions)2021% Change2020% Change2019
Research and development$78.1
 $83.0
 $(4.9) (6)%Research and development$71.9 (9)%$78.9 1%$78.1 
As a percentage of total revenues10.0% 10.7%    As a percentage of total revenues8.8 %10.7 %10.0 %
Selling, general and administrative$128.1
 $123.4
 $4.7
 4 %Selling, general and administrative$125.5 (12)%$142.2 11%$128.1 
As a percentage of total revenues16.4% 16.0%    As a percentage of total revenues15.3 %19.3 %16.4 %
Impairment of intangible assets$4.8
 $3.0
 $1.8
 60 %Impairment of intangible assets$— (100)%$2.8 (42)%$4.8 
As a percentage of total revenues0.6% 0.4%    As a percentage of total revenues— %0.4 %0.6 %
Operating expenses$211.0
 $209.4
 $1.6
 1 %Operating expenses$197.4 (12)%$223.9 6%$211.0 
As a percentage of total revenues27.0% 27.1%    As a percentage of total revenues24.1 %30.3 %27.0 %
Research and Development
Research and development costs for fiscal year 20192021 decreased to 10%8.8% of revenues due to lower personnel costsengineering related material purchases and prototype material costs.cost reduction actions undertaken in fiscal year 2020, which have resulted in cost savings in fiscal year 2021, as well as higher revenues in fiscal year 2021. We are committed to investing in the businessresearch and development efforts to support long-term growth objectives by bringing new and believe long-term research and development expenses of approximately 8% to 10% of annual revenues is the appropriate range that will allow us to innovate and bring newinnovative products to market for our global OEM customers.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increaseddecreased to 16.4%15.3% for fiscal year 20192021 from 16.0%19.3% for fiscal year 20182020 due to higherlower audit and consulting fees associated with the remediation of internal control deficiencies, and increased legal fees for patent litigation. These were offset by reductionscost reduction actions undertaken in personnel costs and other consulting fees.fiscal year 2020, which have resulted in cost savings in fiscal year 2021.
Impairment of intangible assets
Impairment of intangible assets increaseddecreased for fiscal year 20192021 to $4.8$0.0 million as compared to $3.0$2.8 million for fiscal year 2018. In connection with the July 2019 announcement of the Santa Clara facility shut down we made the decision to discontinue further efforts on certain in-process research and development intangible assets. As a result, we recorded a corresponding impairment charge of $4.8 million in fiscal year 2019.2020. See Note 4.12. RestructuringGoodwill and Intangible Assets, included in the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information.
Interest and Other Income (Expense),Expense, Net
The following table summarizes our interest and other income (expense),expense, net:
Fiscal Years  
(In millions)2019 2018 $ Change(In millions)2021% Change2020% Change2019
Interest income$0.1
 $0.2
 $(0.1)Interest income$0.1 —%$0.1 —%$0.1 
Interest expense(21.1) (21.7) 0.6
Interest expense(42.1)34%(31.4)49%(21.1)
Other income (expense), net(3.2) 2.7
 (5.9)
Other expense, netOther expense, net(3.5)(54)%(7.6)138%(3.2)
Interest and other expenses, net$(24.2) $(18.8) $(5.4)Interest and other expenses, net$(45.5)17%$(38.9)61%$(24.2)
Interest and other expense, net increased in fiscal year 20192021 compared to fiscal year 2018,2020. Interest expense increased primarily due to a otherthe interest related to our Convertible Notes issued during June 2020, and the issuance of our Senior Secured Notes in September 2020 which had higher effective interest rates, as well as the partial extinguishment of the Senior Secured Notes. Other expense, from equity method investments compared to other income from equity method investments in the prior fiscal year. A new joint venture investment was establishednet decreased in fiscal year 2019.2021 compared to fiscal year 2020. Other expense, net during fiscal year 2020 consisted primarily of the impairment of certain investments in privately-held companies and a decrease in the fair value of the deferred consideration related to the Direct Conversion acquisition, which did not recur during fiscal year 2021.
Taxes on EarningsIncome
Fiscal Years
20212020
Effective tax rate37.4 %20.9 %
40

Table of Contents
 Fiscal Years
 2019 2018
Effective tax rate26.5% (10.1)%

    We had an income tax expense of $5.7$10.7 million and an income tax benefit of $2.6$15.2 million, for effective rates of 26.5%37.4% and (10.1)%20.9%, for fiscal years 20192021 and 2018,2020, respectively.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (U.S. Tax Reform) was enacted in the U.S. which significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure. Among the revisions impacting our effective tax rate are a lower U.S. corporate statutory rate going from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and changes to the way foreign earnings are taxed. As a September fiscal year filer, the lower corporate income tax rate was phased in with a U.S. statutory federal rate of 24.5% in fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, and a rate of 21% for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019.
During fiscal year 2019,2021, our effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21.0%21% primarily because ofdue to the favorableunfavorable impact of changes to the U.S. corporatedeferred tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform, U.S. researchattributes and development tax credits, and tax windfalls for share-based compensation. These favorable U.S. tax items are offset by increases resulting from losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized and earningsa reduction in other foreign jurisdictions thatbenefit for U.S. net operating losses carried back to prior years. These unfavorable items are taxed at higher rates.partially offset by the favorable impact of R&D tax credits and U.S. tax reform international provisions.
During fiscal year 2018,2020, our effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily because of the favorable impact of changesU.S. net operating losses to the U.S. corporatebe carried back to tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform. The effective tax rate also differs from theyears with greater U.S. federal statutory rate due to increases resulting from U.S. state incomerates. These favorable tax expense,items are mostly offset by the unfavorable impact of additional losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, limitations on interest expense, and R&D credits for which no benefit is recognized, earnings in other foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at higher rates, and limitations onrecognized.
    We estimated the deductibility of officers' compensation. These are offset by decreases due to U.S. research and development credits, tax windfalls for share-based compensation, and the release of a valuation allowance against loss carryforwards in certain foreign jurisdictions.
The SEC issued guidance under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”) that allows for reasonable estimated amounts to be recorded and a measurement period of up to one year from the date of enactment to revise these provisional amounts as new information is obtained and additional guidance is issued. During the three months ended December 28, 2018, the Company completed its analysis of U.S. Tax Reform, and the accounting for the income tax effects has been finalized for the measurement period under SAB 118, with no significant adjustments from the provisional amounts. During fiscal year 2019, additional U.S. Tax Reform provisions, including2021 GILTI (global intangible low-taxed income), BEAT (base-erosion anti-abuse tax), FDII (foreign-derived intangible income), limitations on interest expense deductions, (if certain conditions apply), and other components became effective for usof U.S. Tax Reform, and if applicable, have been included these amounts in the calculation of ourthe fiscal year 20192021 tax provision. The determination of the tax effects of U.S. Tax Reform may change following future legislation or further interpretation of U.S. Tax Reform from various U.S. Federal and state tax authorities.
The guidance forWe made an accounting for U.S. Tax Reform requires taxpayers to make an election regarding the accounting for GILTI. This policy election, isas allowed by the SEC and FASB, to either: (1) treatrecognize the impact of GILTI as a period cost if and when incurred, or (2) recognize deferred taxes for basis differences that are expected to reverse as GILTI in future years. During fiscal year 2019, we made the accounting policy election to account for GILTI under the period cost method.incurred.
Discussion of Results of Operations for Fiscal Year 2018 and 2017
Revenues, net
 Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Medical$602.0
 $556.9
 $45.1
 8%
Industrial171.4
 141.2
 30.2
 21%
Total revenues, net$773.4
 $698.1
 $75.3
 11%
Medical as a percentage of total revenues78% 80%    
Industrial as a percentage of total revenues22% 20%    
Medical revenues increased $45.1 million primarily due to an increase in sales of high-end radiographic digital detectors with the addition of revenues from the acquisition of the medical imaging business (“Acquired Detector Business”) of PerkinElmer, Inc., and from increased sales of X-ray tubes, including CT tubes to our OEM customers in China, and high voltage cables. These increases in medical revenues were partially offset by a decrease in sales of 3-D dental digital detectors and low-end radiographic.
Industrial revenues increased $30.2 million due to increased sales of digital detectors from the addition of the Acquired Detector Business, and from increased sales of high-voltage industrial cables. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of industrial digital detectors.

Revenues by Region
 Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Americas$275.8
 $239.8
 $36.0
 15%
EMEA254.5
 219.5
 35.0
 16%
APAC243.1
 238.8
 4.3
 2%
Total revenues, net$773.4
 $698.1
 $75.3
 11%
Americas as a percentage of total revenues36% 34%    
EMEA as a percentage of total revenues33% 31%    
APAC as a percentage of total revenues31% 34%    
The Americas revenues increased $36.0 million primarily due to increased sales of digital detectors from the addition of the Acquired Detector Business. EMEA revenues increased $35.0 million primarily due to increased sales of digital detectors from the addition of the Acquired Detector Business partially offset by lower sales of security and inspection products and digital detectors. APAC revenues increased $4.3 million due to increased sales of digital detectors from the addition of the Acquired Detector Business and higher sales of X-ray tubes, partially offset by lower sales of digital detectors.
Gross Margin
 Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Medical$190.5
 $193.6
 $(3.1) (2)%
Industrial63.4
 59.9
 3.5
 6 %
Total gross margin$253.9
 $253.5
 $0.4
  %
Medical gross margin %31.6% 34.8%    
Industrial gross margin %37.0% 42.4%    
Total gross margin %32.8% 36.3%    
The decrease in total gross margin percentage was due primarily to a product mix shift to lower margin products, restructuring charges of $7.3 million, including inventory markdowns of $3.1 million, higher digital detector product and indirect costs in our Santa Clara facility and the impact of tariffs in the fourth quarter. The decrease in medical gross margin percentage were primarily due to product mix shifts towards lower margin X-ray tubes and higher digital detector unit products costs in our Santa Clara facility. The decrease in industrial gross margin percentage were primarily due to product mix shifts towards lower margin cargo scanning products and price erosion in this same product category.
Operating Expenses
 Fiscal Years    
(In millions)2018 2017 $ Change % Change
Research and development$83.0
 $67.3
 $15.7
 23%
As a percentage of total revenues10.7% 9.6%    
Selling, general and administrative (1)
$123.4
 $102.5
 $20.9
 20%
As a percentage of total revenues16.0% 14.7%    
Impairment of intangible assets$3.0
 $
 $3.0
 n/a
As a percentage of total revenues0.4% $
    
Operating expenses$209.4
 $169.8
 $39.6
 23%
As a percentage of total revenues27.1% 24.3%    
(1)Selling, general and administrative expenses include $12.4 million of corporate costs allocated to us by Varian in fiscal year 2017.

Research and Development
The increase in research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue was due to the continued acceleration and development of digital detector projects and prototype materials costs for CT X-ray tubes.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased primarily as a result of restructuring and impairment charges related to the Acquired Detector Business, increased amortization of intangible assets, increased share-based compensation expense and an increase in costs related to implementation of certain productivity initiatives.
Impairment of intangible assets
Impairment of intangible assets for fiscal year 2018 were $3.0 million, while there was no impairment of intangible assets for fiscal year 2017. In connection with the restructuring plan that was announced in July 2018 we recorded an impairment charge of $3.0 million related to certain intangible assets. See Note 4. Restructuring included in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information.
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
The following table summarizes our interest and other income (expense), net:
 Fiscal Years  
(In millions)2018 2017 $ Change
Interest income$0.2
 $0.2
 $
Interest expense(21.7) (12.3) (9.4)
Other income (expense), net2.7
 3.2
 (0.5)
Interest and other expenses, net$(18.8) $(8.9) $(9.9)
The increase in interest and other income (expense), net was primarily due to higher interest expense as a result of higher weighted average interest rates and higher weighted average outstanding borrowings under our credit agreement and foreign currency translation losses, partially offset by income from equity method investments.
Taxes on Earnings
 Fiscal Years
 2018 2017
Effective tax rate(10.1)% 30.5%
We had an income tax benefit of $2.6 million and an income tax expense of $22.8 million for the year ended September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017, respectively, for effective rates of (10.1)% and 30.5%, respectively.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”) was enacted in the U.S. which significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure. Among the revisions impacting our effective tax rate are a lower U.S. corporate statutory rate going from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and changes to the way foreign earnings are taxed. As a September fiscal year filer, the lower corporate income tax rate has been phased in resulting in a U.S. statutory federal rate of 24.5% for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018.
During fiscal year 2018, our effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 24.5% primarily because of the favorable impact of changes to the U.S. corporate tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform. The effective tax rate also differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to increases resulting from U.S. state income tax expense, losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized, earnings in other foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at higher rates, and limitations on the deductibility of officers' compensation. These are offset by decreases due to U.S. research and development credits, tax windfalls for share-based compensation, and the release of a valuation allowance against loss carryforwards in certain foreign jurisdictions.
During fiscal year 2017, our effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily because of a difference in the mix of earnings by jurisdiction, and overall global tax structure for Varex as a stand-alone company compared to the prior year when it was part of Varian. It was also impacted by the benefit of adjustments to certain deferred tax assets and the release of valuation allowances in jurisdictions where increased earnings allowed for the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards.

During fiscal year 2018, as a result of U.S. Tax Reform, we recorded income tax expense of $3.7 million for the tax on the deemed repatriation of deferred foreign earnings offset by a tax benefit of $10.9 million due to the revaluation of net deferred taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We assess our liquidity in terms of our ability to generate cash to fund our operating,operations, including working capital and investing activities. We continue to generate sufficient cash from operating activities and believe that our operating cash flow, cash on our balance sheet and availability under our existing credit facility, current working capital and other sources of liquidityABL Facility will be sufficient to allow us to continue to invest in our existing businesses, consummate strategic acquisitions andto manage our capital structure on a short and long-term basis. Availabilitybasis, and to meet our anticipated operating cash needs. The maximum availability under our credit facilityABL Facility was $91.0$100.0 million as of September 27, 2019, although on October 8, 2019, we permanently reduced1, 2021; however, the revolving credit commitmentborrowing base under the credit facility by $25.0 million to $125.0 million. Although we believe that our future cashABL Facility fluctuates from operations, together with our access to bankingmonth-to-month depending on the amount of eligible accounts receivable and capital markets, will provide adequate resources to fund our operating and financing needs, our access to, and the availability of, financing on acceptable terms in the future will be affected by many factors, including: (i) the liquidity of the overall capital markets and (ii) the current state of the economy. There can be no assurances that we will continue to have access to these markets on terms acceptable to us.inventory. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for a further discussion. Subsequent to fiscal year 2019 we did not comply with the covenant under the Credit Agreement to timely deliver our fiscal year 2019 annual financial statements. However, upon the filing of this Annual Report with the SEC, we will be able to deliver the fiscal year 2019 annual financial statements within the 30-day cure period set forth in the Credit Agreement and consequently no event of default will occur. At September 27, 2019October 1, 2021 we had $364.4$431.7 million in long-term debt, and $30.7 millionnet of current maturities of long-term debt, net ofdiscounts and deferred issuance costs of $5.7$46.1 million.
    On July 15, 2021, the Company redeemed $30 million of principal of our $300 million, 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 (the "Senior Secured Notes"), in accordance with the terms and conditions of the governing indenture by paying cash of $31.5 million, inclusive of the redemption premium and accrued interest, and recognized a $1.4 million loss related to the redemption premium and the write-off of previously recorded debt issuance costs. See Note 8.10. Borrowings, in the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our existing credit facility.indebtedness.
    Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents increased from $100.6 million as of October 2, 2020, to $144.6 as of October 1, 2021. This increase was primarily due to cash inflows from operating activities of $92.6 million, offset by capital expenditures of $15.1 million and debt repayments of $33.1 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020$ Change% Change
Cash and cash equivalents$144.6 $100.6 $44.0 43.7 %
41

(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018 $ Change % Change
Cash and cash equivalents$29.9
 $51.9
 $(22.0) (42.4)%
Table of Contents
Borrowings
The following table summarizes the changes in our debt outstanding:
(In millions, except for percentages)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020$ Change% Change
Current maturities of long-term debt
Current portion of other debt$2.8 $2.5 $0.3 $0.1 
Total current maturities of long-term debt:$2.8 $2.5 $0.3 12.0 %
Non-current maturities of long-term debt:
Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes$200.0 $200.0 $— — %
Senior Secured Notes270.0 300.0 (30.0)(10.0)%
Other debt7.8 8.8 (1.0)(11.4)%
Total non-current maturities of long-term debt:$477.8 $508.8 $(31.0)(6.1)%
Unamortized issuance costs and debt discounts
Unamortized discount - Convertible Notes$(37.6)$(45.4)$7.8 (17.2)%
Unamortized issuance costs - Convertible Notes(4.1)(5.0)0.9 (18.0)%
Debt issuance costs - Senior Secured Notes(4.4)(5.6)1.2 (21.4)%
Total$(46.1)$(56.0)$9.9 (17.7)%
Total debt outstanding, net$434.5 $455.3 $(20.8)(4.6)%
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018 $ Change % Change
Current portion of Term Facility$29.4
 $25.0
 $4.4
 17.6 %
Current portion of other long-term debt1.3
 
 1.3
 n/a
Revolving Credit Facility59.0
 28.0
 31.0
 110.7 %
Long-Term portion of Term Facility308.6
 345.0
 (36.4) (10.6)%
Long-term portion of other debt2.5
 
 2.5
 n/a
Total debt outstanding, gross400.8
 398.0
 2.8
 0.7 %
Debt issuance costs(5.7) (8.2) 2.5
 (30.5)%
Total debt outstanding, net$395.1
 $389.8
 $5.3
 1.4 %


Cash Flows
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Net cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities$92.6 $13.2 $71.9 
Investing activities(16.2)(26.9)(93.2)
Financing activities(32.3)83.6 (0.1)
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(0.1)0.9 (0.7)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$44.0 $70.8 $(22.1)
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Net cash flow provided by (used in):     
Operating activities$71.9
 $85.3
 $75.2
Investing activities(93.2) (25.2) (292.0)
Financing activities(0.1) (90.4) 263.3
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(0.7) (0.5) 0.9
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$(22.1) $(30.8) $47.4
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. Cash from operating activities consists primarily of net earningsincome adjusted for certain non-cash items, including share-based compensation, depreciation, amortization and impairment of intangible assets, inventory write-downs, deferred income taxes, amortization of deferred loan costs, income and loss from equity investments and the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities.
For fiscal year 2019,2021, compared to fiscal year 2018,2020, net cash provided by operating activities were as follows:
Net earnings were $15.8income of $17.9 million compared to $28.3net loss of $57.4 million,
Non-cash adjustments to net earnings of $51.4income were $66.5 million compared to $51.0$84.5 million,
Operating assets and liabilities activity:
Accounts receivable decreased by $14.8 million compared to $9.0 million,
Inventories increased by $11.1 million compared to $2.4 million,
Prepaid expenses and other assets decreased $4.3 million compared to $2.0 million,
Accounts payable decreased by $9.0 million compared to an increase of $5.2 million,
Accrued liabilities and other long-term operating liabilities increased by $10.9 million compared to a decrease of $10.2 million, and
Deferred revenues decreased by $5.2 million compared to an increase of $2.4 million.
For fiscal year 2017, net cash provided by $32.9 million compared to a decrease of $17.7 million,
Inventories decreased by $42.8 million compared to an increase of $42.7 million,
Prepaid expenses and other assets increased by $0.9 million compared to $9.3 million,
Accounts payable increased by $13.6 million compared to a decrease of $14.3 million,
Accrued liabilities and other long-term operating activities was $75.2liabilities decreased by $12.2 million compared to a decrease of $8.1 million, and consisted
Deferred revenues decreased by $0.6 million compared to an increase of net earnings of $52.0 million, increases from non-cash items of $29.2 million and decreases from operating assets and liabilities activities of $6.0$2.0 million.
Net cash used in investing activities. Cash used in investing activities was $93.2 million, $25.2$16.2 million and $292.0$26.9 million for the fiscal years 2019, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively. NetThe decrease in cash used in investing activities for fiscal year 2019was primarily due to higher capital spending during the twelve months ended October 2, 2020, related primarily to the April 2019, acquisitionbuilding of 98.2%our facility in the Netherlands.
42

Table of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion for $69.5 million in cash, net of cash acquired, and capital expenditures for property plant and equipment of $19.8 million. Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal year 2018 related primarily to an acquisition of an industrial imaging solutions provider for $4.8 million, and capital expenditures for property plant and equipment of $20.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal year 2017 related to the Acquired Detector Business for $271.8 million (net of cash acquired) and capital expenditures for property plant and equipment of $20.2 million.Contents
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities. FinancingWe used $32.3 million of cash in financing activities for the fiscal year 2019twelve months ended October 1, 2021. Net cash used in financing activity for the twelve months ended October 1, 2021, was primarily consisteddue to our early redemption of $30 million of our Senior Secured Notes. Net cash provided by financing activity for the twelve months ended October 2, 2020, was primarily due to our issuance of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.00% unsecured convertible senior notes due 2025 (“Convertible Notes”). The net proceeds from the issuance of the Convertible Notes, after deducting transaction fees, were approximately $193.1 million. In connection with the offering of the Convertible Notes, we separately entered into privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions (collectively, the “Hedge Transactions”). The Hedge Transactions cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the number of shares of our common stock that initially underlay the Convertible Notes. We also entered into warrant transactions (collectively, the “Warrant Transactions” and, together with the Hedge Transactions, the “Call Spread Transactions”), whereby we sold warrants at a higher strike price relating to the same number of shares of our common stock that initially underlay the Convertible Notes, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. We used $11.2 million of the net proceeds from the issuance of the Convertible Notes to pay the cost of the Call Spread Transactions. Additionally, during the twelve months ended October 2, 2020, we had borrowings under our credit agreementsagreement of $85.4$91.7 million and repayments of borrowings of $87.0$218.0 million.
    Additionally, during fiscal year 2020 we issued $300.0 million andaggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes. The net proceeds from equity plansthe Senior Secured Notes after initial purchasers’ discount, commissions and estimated fees and expenses of $2.5$5.6 million, were approximately $294.4 million. Financing activities forWe used $267.5 million of the fiscal year 2018 primarily consisted of borrowings under our credit agreements of $10.0 million, repayments of borrowings of $106.0 million, and net proceeds from equity plans of $4.8 million. Financing activities for the fiscal years 2017 primarily consisted of borrowings underoffering to terminate and repay our previously existing credit agreements of $749.0 million and net transfers from Varian of $5.0 million, partially offset by distributions to Varian of $227.1 million, repayments of borrowings of $255.0 million and payment of debt issuance costs of $11.9 million.agreement.
Days Sales Outstanding
Trade accounts receivable days sales outstanding (“DSO”) was 6362 days and 6866 days at September 27, 2019October 1, 2021 and September 28, 2018,October 2, 2020, respectively. Our accounts receivable and DSO are impacted by a number of factors, primarily including the timing of product shipments, collections performance, payment terms, the mix of revenues from different regions and the effects of economic instability.

Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes, as of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, the total amount of future payments due in various future periods:
Payments Due by PeriodPayments Due by Period
(In millions)Total Fiscal Year 2020 Fiscal Years 2021-2022 Fiscal Years 2023-2024 Beyond(In millions)TotalFiscal Year 2022Fiscal Years 2023-2024Fiscal Years 2025-2026Beyond
Operating lease obligations$20.5
 $7.5
 $10.1
 $2.7
 $0.2
Lease obligationsLease obligations$29.9 $7.6 $9.3 $6.3 $6.7 
Principal payments on borrowings400.8
 30.7
 370.1
 
 
Principal payments on borrowings480.6 2.8 4.3 203.1 270.4 
DpiX fixed cost commitment3.7
 3.7
 
 
 
Dividends to redeemable interest4.2
 0.6
 1.2
 1.2
 1.2
dpiX fixed cost commitmentdpiX fixed cost commitment2.9 2.9 — — — 
Dividends to MeVis noncontrolling interestDividends to MeVis noncontrolling interest3.8 0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1 
Supplier equipment acquisitionSupplier equipment acquisition9.8 9.8 — — — 
Total$429.2
 $42.5
 $381.4
 $3.9
 $1.4
Total$527.0 $23.6 $14.7 $210.5 $278.2 
We lease office space under non-cancelable operating leases. TheFor further information on our operating leases, expire at various dates through 2025, excluding extensions at our option, and contain provisions for rental adjustments, including in certain cases, adjustments based on increasessee Note 3. Leases, included in the Consumer Price Index. The leases generally contain renewal provisions for varying periods of time.accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements.
For further discussion regarding our borrowings, see Note 8.10. Borrowings, included in the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements.
In October 2013, we entered into an amended agreement with dpiX and other parties that, among other things, provides us with the right to 50% of dpiX’s total manufacturing capacity produced after January 1, 2014. The amended agreement requires us to pay for 50% of the fixed costs (as defined in the amended agreement), as determined at the beginning of each calendar year. For the remainder of calendar year 2019,2021, we estimate that we have fixed cost commitments of $3.7$2.9 million related to this amended agreement. The fixed cost commitment for future periods will be determined and approved by the dpiX board of directors at the beginning of each calendar year. The amended agreement will continue unless the ownership structure of dpiX changes (as defined in the amended agreement).
In October 2015, pursuant to a Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement (the “MeVis Agreement”), we committed to grant the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis: (1) an annual recurring net compensation of €0.95 per MeVis share; and, (2) a put right for their MeVis shares at €19.77 per MeVis share. The annual net payment will continue for the life of the MeVis
43

Table of Contents
Agreement, which we anticipate will continue for as long as we remain as the controlling shareholder of MeVis. As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, noncontrolling shareholders together held approximately 0.5 million shares of MeVis, representing 26.3% of the outstanding shares.
    Varex entered into a purchase agreement with a supplier to acquire certain equipment and intellectual property from the supplier that is utilized to manufacture X-ray cables utilized in Varex's products. For more information about our supplier equipment acquisition, see Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies, included in the accompanying notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Contingencies
From time to time, we arethe Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations, customs and duty audits, and other contingency matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of ourits business or otherwise. Such mattersThe Company accrues amounts for probable losses, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are subjectadequate to many uncertaintiesaddress any liabilities related to legal proceedings and outcomesother loss contingencies that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value). A loss or a range of loss is disclosed when it is reasonably possible that a material loss will be incurred and can be estimated or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss, when material, will exceed the recorded provision. The Company did not have any material contingent liabilities as of October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020. Legal expenses are not predictable with assurance.expensed as incurred.
See Part 1, Item 3 of this Annual Report for additional information regarding legal proceedings and Note 11,13. Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding certain of our contractual obligations and contingencies, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In conjunction with the sale of our products in the ordinary course of business, and consistent with industry practice, we provide standard indemnification of business partners and customers for losses suffered or incurred for property damages, death and injury and for patent, copyright or any other intellectual property infringement claims by any third parties with respect to our products. The terms of these indemnification arrangements are generally perpetual. Except for losses related to property damages, the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these arrangements is unlimited. As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, we have not incurred any material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification arrangements. As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these arrangements is minimal.
We also have indemnification obligations to our directors and officers and certain of our employees that serve as officers or directors of our foreign subsidiaries that may require us to indemnify our directors and officers and those certain employees against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, and to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any legal proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Our critical accounting policies that are affected by accounting estimates require us to use judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates and assumptions regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, and actual results could differ materially from these estimates. For a discussion of how these estimates and other factors may affect our business, see “Risk Factors.”
We periodically review our accounting policies, estimates and assumptions and make adjustments when facts and circumstances dictate. Such accounting policies require us to use judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates and assumptions regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, and actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies that are affected by accounting estimates include valuation of inventories, assessment of recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets, and income taxes. Such accounting policies require us to use judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates and assumptions regarding matters that are inherently uncertain, and actual results could differ materially from these estimates. For a discussion of how these estimates and other factors may affect our business, see Item 1A,1A. “Risk Factors.”
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead
and is computed using standard cost (which approximates actual cost) on a first-in-first-out basis. We evaluate the carrying
value of
44

Table of Contents
our inventories taking into consideration such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared to quantities on hand
and the prices we expect to obtain for products in our various markets. We adjust excess and obsolete inventories to net realizable value and write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories are recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is initially recorded when the purchase price paid for a business acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Our future operating performance will be impacted by the future amortization of these acquired intangible assets and potential impairment charges related to these intangibles or to goodwill if indicators of impairment exist. The allocation of the purchase price from business acquisitions to goodwill and intangible assets could have a material impact on our future operating results. In addition, the allocation of the purchase price of the acquired businesses to goodwill and intangible assets requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including estimates of future cash flows expected to be generated by the acquired assets and the appropriate discount rate for those cash flows. Should conditions differ from management’s estimates at the time of the acquisition, material write-downs of intangible assets and/or goodwill may be required, which would adversely affect our operating results.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment at least annually or whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The evaluation includes consideration of qualitative factors including industry and market considerations, overall financial performance, and other relevant events and factors affecting the reporting unit. If we determine that a quantitative analysis is necessary, the impairment test for goodwill iswe perform a two-step process. Step onequantitative analysis which consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit against its carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. We determine the fair value of our reporting units based on a combination of income and market approaches. The income approach is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows of the reporting units and the market approach is based on a market multiple calculated for each reporting unit based on market data of other companies engaged in similar business. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is in excess of its fair value, step two requires the comparison ofdifference between the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill against theand carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is recorded as an impairment loss. The impairment test for intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, if any, consists of a comparison of fair value to carrying value, with any excess of carrying value over fair value being recorded as an impairment loss.
In fiscal years 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, we performed the annual goodwill impairment test for our two reporting units and found no impairment. We performed the annual goodwill analysis as of the first day of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year (using balances as of the end of the third quarter of that fiscal year). For both reporting units, based upon the annual goodwill analysis that we performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the respective fiscal years, either step onea quantitative analysis of the impairment test was not completed based on evaluation of qualitative factors or, if step onequantitative analysis was completed, the fair value was substantially in excess of carrying value. However, significant changes in our projections aboutof our operating results or other factors could cause us to make interim assessments of impairments in any quarter that could result in some or all of the goodwill being impaired.
    Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates, and market factors. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans, as well as industry, economic, and regulatory conditions. These assumptions and estimates include estimated future annual net cash flows, income tax rates, discount rates, revenue growth rates, forecasted gross margins, market multiples, terminal value and other market factors. This fair value measurement was based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 fair value measurement. If current expectations of future revenue growth rates and forecasted gross margins, both in size and timing, are not met, if market factors outside of our control, such as discount rates, change, if market multiples decline, or if management’s expectations or plans otherwise change, including as a result of the development of our global five-year operating plan, then one or more of our reporting units might become impaired in the future. The Company will continue to monitor the financial performance of and assumptions for its reporting units. A future impairment charge for goodwill could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position and results of operations.
We will continue to make assessments of impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment arise.

Impairment of Investments
We have investments in privately held companies that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting as we hold at least a 20% ownership interest or have the ability to exercise significant influence in these investments. We monitor these investments for events or circumstances indicative of potential impairment, and we make appropriate reductions in carrying values if we determine that an impairment charge is required, based primarily on the financial condition, near-term prospects and recent financing activities of the investee.
Taxes on EarningsIncome
Current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or receivable for the current year. Deferred income tax liabilities or assets are established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from the differences in financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Future changes in tax regulation can have a material impact, including tax rate changes or the realization of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. U.S. Tax Reform introduced a limitation of business interest deduction under IRC Section 163(j), which may be difficult to utilize without significant taxable income. Also, net operating loss carryforwards in jurisdictions with
45

Table of Contents
current losses provide uncertainty for realization. In addition, we provide reserves for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed by the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. A portion of the U.S. general business tax credits for research outside of the financial statement line for research and development (R&D) have a small degree of uncertainty. A reasonable reserve is maintained on the uncertain portion until either the Internal Revenue Service chooses to audit, or the statute of limitation expires. A reserve for R&D is typical for companies who calculate and utilize this general business credit. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of income tax expense.
    On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permits net operating loss ("NOL") carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. On July 2, 2020, the US Treasury Department issued a regulation providing an election to waive NOL carryback to a former consolidated group. During fiscal year 2021, we filed NOL carryback claims for U.S. losses incurred in fiscal year 2020 and anticipates cash tax refunds on those claims.
Recent Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective
    See Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and the estimated effects on our consolidated financial statements.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“U. S. Tax Reform”). U.S. Tax Reform significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure including a lower corporate statutory rate and changes to the way foreign earnings are taxed. U.S. GAAP requires that the impact of tax legislation be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. In accordance with these rules, we are including the impact of certain provisions of U.S. Tax Reform to the extent they are effective during the current reporting period.
Backlog
Backlog is the accumulation of all orders for which revenues have not been recognized and are still considered valid. Backlog also includes a small portion of billed service contracts that are included in deferred revenue. Our estimated total backlog at September 27, 2019October 1, 2021 was $265.2 million, a decrease of 13.9% from the backlog of $308.1 million at September 28, 2018.approximately $327 million.
Orders may be revised or canceled, either according to their terms or as customers’customers' needs change. Consequently, it is difficult to predict with certainty the amount of backlog that will result in revenues. We perform a quarterly review to verify that outstanding orders in the backlog remain valid. Aged orders that are not expected to be converted to revenues are deemed dormant and are reflected as a reduction in the backlog amounts in the period identified.
In addition to orders for which revenues have not been recognized and are still considered valid, we have pricing agreements with many of our established customers that span multi-year periods. These pricing agreements include volume ranges under which orders are placed.
Recent Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective
See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and the estimated effects on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
We are exposed to four primary types of market risks: foreign currency exchange rate risk, credit and counterparty risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
A significant portion of our customers are outside the United States, while our financial statements are denominated, and our products are generally priced in U.S. Dollars. A strong U.S. Dollar may result in pricing pressure for our customers that are located outside the United States and that conduct their businesses in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. Such pricing pressure has caused, and could continue to cause, some of our customers to ask for discounted prices, delay purchasing decisions, consider moving to in-sourcing supply of components or migrating to lower cost alternatives. In addition, because our business is global and some payments may be made in local currency, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can impact our revenues and expenses and/or the profitability in U.S. Dollars of products and services that we provide in foreign markets.


We may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts with financial institutions to protect against foreign exchange risks associated with certain existing assets and liabilities, and net investments in foreign subsidiaries. We generally hedge portions of forecasted foreign currency exposure, typically for one month.to three months. In addition, we hold a cross-currency swap between the Euro and U.S. Dollar as a Net Investment Hedge of our recent acquisition of Direct Conversion. Depending on the spot rate between the Euro and U.S. Dollar at the time of settlement and whether we have sufficient Euros available, we may have to borrow incrementally in U.S. Dollars to settle this obligation. However,Additionally, we may choose not to hedge certain foreign exchange exposures
46



for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to, accounting considerations, or the prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures, or due to natural offsets among the different exposures.
Credit and Counterparty Risk
We use a centralized approach to manage substantially all of our cash and to finance our operations. Our cash and cash equivalents may be exposed to a concentration of credit risk and we may also be exposed to credit risk and interest rate risk to the extent that we enter into credit facilities.
We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and we maintain what we believe to be strong credit controls in evaluating and granting customer credit, including performing ongoing evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and creditworthiness and often using letters of credit and requiring industrialcertain Industrial customers to provide a down payment.
Interest Rate Risk
At September 27, 2019, we had total borrowings of $395.1 million (net of deferred loan costs).    Borrowings under our credit facilitiesABL Facility bear interest at floating interest rates. As a result,At October 1, 2021, we are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates to the extent of ourhad no borrowings under the credit facilities. As part of our overall risk management program, we entered into several interest rate swaps designed as cash flow hedges, to hedge the floating LIBOR components of our interest rate which represented a notional value of $264.4 million of our debt as of September 27, 2019. Excluding the amount of our borrowings that is subject to fixedfloating interest rates under our interest rate swaps, and assuming the current level of borrowings remained the same, we estimate that our interest expense would change by approximately $1.3 million annually for each one percentage point change in the average interest rate under our borrowings.
rates. See Note 7. Financial Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 8.10. Borrowings, of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for further information on interest rate hedging activities and borrowings.information.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to volatility in the prices of raw materials used in our products. The prices of these raw materials fluctuate in response to changes in supply and demand fundamentals and our product margins and level of profitability tend to fluctuate with changes in these raw materials prices. We try to protect against such volatility through various business strategies. During the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, we did not have any commodity derivative instruments in place to manage our exposure to price changes.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, Schedules and Exhibits on page F-1 are filed as part of this Annual Report and incorporated in this Item 8 by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None. 
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") are designed to ensureprovide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in theour periodic reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act isare recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and to ensure that such information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our management, including


our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. TheManagement recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed, and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), with assistance from other members of management, have evaluated the effectiveness ofconcluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 27, 2019 and, based on their evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of such date due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described below.October 1, 2021.

To address the material weaknesses described below, and prior to filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to determine our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Based on these procedures, management has concluded that our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and our CEO and CFO have certified that, based on their knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-K, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an unqualified opinion on our consolidated financial statements, which appears herein.

Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our managementManagement, under the supervision of our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our management evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the
47


"COSO framework" (2013)). All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Accordingly, even effective internal controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2021. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2021.
    The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2021 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears below in “Item 9a. Controls and Procedures".

Previously Identified Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
    We previously identified and disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2020 material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting relating to the following:

Control Environment: We did not maintain an effective control environment as we had an insufficient complement of resources with the requisite knowledge and experience to create the proper environment for effective internal control over financial reporting such that corrective activities to our internal control over financial reporting are appropriately applied, prioritized, and implemented in a timely manner.

Risk Assessment: We did not design and maintain an effective risk assessment process to identify and assess the risks in our business processes. Specifically, we did not adequately identify new and evolving risks of material misstatement and design and implement controls to address those risks as a result of changes to our business operating environment.

Inventory and cost of revenues: We did not design and maintain effective controls related to accounting for inventory and cost of revenues, including maintaining effective business process controls to prevent or detect misstatements in the existence, accuracy, and presentation and disclosure of inventory. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls related to the verification of inventory at third party vendor locations and the presentation and disclosure of inventory classification.

Financial Reporting: We did not design and maintain effective controls over our financial reporting close process to prevent or detect material misstatements in our financial statements. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective controls related to the completeness, accuracy and elimination of intercompany balances and ensuring appropriate segregation of duties as it relates to the preparation and review of journal entries.

Remediation Efforts of Previously Disclosed Material Weaknesses
    Subsequent to the evaluation made in connection with filing our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2020, management, with the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, continued the process of remediating the material weaknesses.
    During the year ended October 1, 2021, we completed our plans to remediate these material weaknesses by performing the following:

We invested significantly in the quality of our accounting talent including management, technical, process improvement and financial system roles. Additionally, we implemented programs to: improve our talent acquisition and retention platforms; enhance technical, transactional and control knowledge of our accounting teams; and created a culture of accountability and control. These programs have significantly improved the stability of our global accounting organization.

We completed a gap analysis of our key controls. In completing this analysis, we identified areas where new controls were necessary and enhancements to existing controls, policies and procedures needed to be made.

48


Implementing or enhancing controls in the inventory business process over (i) verification of inventory at third party vendor locations and (ii) presentation and disclosure of inventory classification.

Implementing or enhancing controls in the financial reporting close process over (i) journal entry posting rights and responsibilities, (ii) appropriate level of segregation of duties and (ii) completeness, accuracy and elimination of intercompany balances.
    As a result of these remediation activities and based on the result of the operating effectiveness testing we performed for the new and modified controls, we concluded the previously reported material weaknesses have been fully remediated as of October 1, 2021.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

    Other than the remediation efforts of previously disclosed material weaknesses described above, there were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 1, 2021, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



49


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Varex Imaging Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Varex Imaging Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of October 1, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended October 1, 2021 of the Company and our report dated November 19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles andprinciples. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

(1)pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets;
(2)provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and
(3)provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019, using the criteria described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Salt Lake City, Utah
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.November 19, 2021

We have identified the following control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019:

We did not design and maintain an effective risk assessment process to identify and assess the risks in our business processes, specifically, we did not adequately identify new and evolving risks of material misstatement and design and implement controls to address those risks as a result of changes to our business operating environment including adoption of new accounting principles. We also did not maintain an effective control environment as we had an insufficient complement of resources with the requisite knowledge and experience to create the proper environment for effective internal control over financial reporting such that corrective activities to our internal control over financial reporting are appropriately applied, prioritized, and implemented in a timely manner. Although these deficiencies did not result in adjustments to our consolidated financial statements, until remediated, they could result in material misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. These material weaknesses contributed to the following control deficiencies, which are also considered to be material weaknesses:


We did not design and maintain effective controls related to accounting for revenue, deferred revenue and related accounts receivable, including maintaining effective business process controls to prevent or detect misstatements in the processing of customer transactions. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective controls related to the review of the completeness and accuracy of customer order entry, quantity and pricing. Additionally, we did not design and maintain effective controls for the effect of the adoption of and continuous accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) to prevent and detect misstatements.
We did not design and maintain effective controls related to accounting for inventory and cost of revenues, including maintaining effective business process controls to prevent or detect misstatements in the accuracy and valuation of inventory. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls related to inventory count procedures, the valuation of inventory at lower of cost and net realizable value and presentation and disclosure of inventory classifications.
We did not design and maintain effective controls over our financial reporting close process to prevent or detect material misstatements in our financial statements. Specifically, we did not maintain an effective business performance monitoring review control at our international entities, maintain effective controls related to the elimination of intercompany balances, design and maintain controls to identify post-close events which occur before the financial statements are available to be issued and design and maintain effective control over the review of the statement of cash flows.

The deficiencies in revenue, inventory and financial reporting close process resulted in immaterial audit adjustments and out of period adjustments to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended and as of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018 and respective interim periods. Additionally, until remediated, these deficiencies could result in a material misstatement impacting the aforementioned accounts and disclosures in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, our management has determined these deficiencies constitute material weaknesses.

Because of the material weaknesses described above, management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019.

A subsidiary of Varex acquired Direct Conversion AB on April 29, 2019. Management has excluded Direct Conversion AB from its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019. The total assets and total revenues of Direct Conversion represent approximately 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statements amounts as of and for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has issued an adverse audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019, which appears herein.

Status of Remediation Efforts

Remediation of Material Weaknesses Reported in Fiscal Year 2018 Form 10-K

We have devoted substantial effort to remediating the areas of material weakness identified in fiscal year 2018 and continue to perform a risk assessment process to identify, design, implement, and re-evaluate the control activities. While we continue to enhance our risk assessment process to ensure that it is comprehensive, management concluded that certain material weaknesses identified in fiscal year 2018 and reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of September 28, 2018, were remediated in fiscal year 2019. Specifically, material weaknesses were remediated in the areas of:
1)information technology general controls (ITGCs) around user access and program change controls; and
2)accounting for our operations in Germany, including maintaining effective business process controls and segregation of duties related to the authorization of transactions and journal entries, and the cutoff, completeness and accuracy of transactions.

Implementation of improvements in ITGCs around user access and program change controls included the following:
Performance of Control Environment Review - As part of the overall risk assessment process, we identified relevant applications and tools to enhance overall controls compliance.
Implementation of Control Design Review - We made significant changes to the control environment by redesigning certain controls to be aligned with the Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT) framework and designing additional controls to ensure all identified risks were addressed. The result is effectively designed information technology general controls in the areas of change management, computer operations, backup and recovery, and security were subject to review. Security controls were reviewed by application.


Performance of Deficiency Specific RemediationPlans - We implemented remediation plans for each of the deficiencies, categorized by remediation actions, process implementation, and control rationalization.  Our remediation plans were focused on identifying and mitigating the risk, and our design effectiveness and operational testing were performed.

User Access:
Sensitive access identified as being inappropriate was removed from our users of in-scope systems.
Implemented real time monitoring in the form of reports and e-mail notifications. This monitoring acts as an alert whenever sensitive access has been executed. 
Sensitive access can now only be used through a specific defined process and requires a service ticket in advance. We review sensitive access for appropriateness quarterly. 
Implemented a specific segregation of duties rule-set, ensuring conflict-free roles are maintained, and user level segregation of duty conflicts are identified for remediation or mapping to certified mitigating controls.
Enhanced the provisioning process by adding a preventative control for new and updated user access by incorporating our specific segregation of duties rule-set to ensure on-going compliance is maintained, and sensitive access and segregation of duty conflicts are not re-introduced into the environment.
Completed a user access review for all accounts within our ERP system.

Change Management:
We implemented an updated change management process and policy, including documented pre-approvals, testing procedures, and post approvals, as needed.
Appropriate segregation of duties were implemented over making source code changes and migrating changes to the production environment.  Our users with developer access do not have access to push code to production.

Improved Germany Control Environment - We engaged outside consultants in Germany to perform a detailed review of business process control documentation, including segregation of duties, authorization of transactions, journal entries, cutoff, completeness and accuracy of transactions, key controls to execute remediation activities, and to implement appropriate controls, assess design and test operating effectiveness, and formalize our corporate-level review and approval.

Ongoing Remediation Efforts

Management has been implementing, and continues to implement, measures designed to ensure (a) that control deficiencies contributing to the remaining material weaknesses in the areas of risk assessment, control environment, revenue, inventory, and financial reporting close are remediated, and (b) that these controls are designed, implemented, and operating effectively. Specifically, we are implementing the following changes:
Risk Assessment Process - We are devoting substantial effort in performing a comprehensive risk assessment process to identify, design, implement, and re-evaluate our control activities related to the above mentioned material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, including monitoring controls related to the design and operating effectiveness of certain control activities pertaining to our business process environment, as more fully discussed below.
Control Environment - We are committed to and are developing plans to attract, develop, and retain additional competent individuals in alignment with our objectives to remediate areas of material weakness, and to create the proper environment for effective internal control over financial reporting such that corrective activities to our internal control over financial reporting are appropriately applied, prioritized, and implemented in a timely manner. In addition, we are reviewing our oversight and supervision of our outside consultants that assist in our evaluation of internal controls and improving project management over internal controls
Revenue Processes - We are implementing controls over (i) standard contract reviews, (ii) customer invoice reviews, (iii) review of monthly sales order changes and (iv) an addition of a management review control that reviews and approves the summary of service billings for the period. We revised the revenue recognition controls due to the transition to ASC 606 and will continue to improve our review controls around the completeness and accuracy of customer order entry, quantity and pricing, and the continuing accounting for ASC 606.
Inventory Processes - We are implementing controls over (i) review of inventory adjustments and approvals and (ii) review over variance analysis. We continue to improve our inventory count procedures, review and valuation controls over inventory.
Financial Close Processes - To be consistent with our consolidated monthly closing financial statement review meetings, we continue to enhance controls over international business performance reviews to include improved documentation of items for follow-up and resolution, expand our review over completeness and accuracy of intercompany balances, design controls


to identify post-close events which occur before the financial statements are available to be issued and enhance controls over the review of the statement of cash flows.

The following represent ongoing remediation efforts related to implemented enhancements to our control environment that we believe will support our ongoing remediation efforts of any remaining material weaknesses:

Formal ICOFR Function - We are enhancing our control environment to include a formal internal control over financial reporting (ICOFR) compliance project management office (PMO) and ICOFR execution function. The roles and responsibilities of the PMO include the management of overall ICOFR timelines, coordination and communication with external and internal audit, process owner working sessions and related follow-up activities, coordination with international operations, and oversight of Company's remediation efforts. The Company has supplemented its internal resources with outside consultants recognized as experts in ICOFR program execution and have augmented process owner awareness and accountability with various training protocols as well as an ICOFR execution and monitoring program application.

Risk Management Committee - We formed an executive Risk Management Committee, which meets regularly, to review risk management and internal audit status updates, ICOFR status, and other compliance areas of focus. A detailed remediation and compliance plan, related timeline and critical milestones were developed, and reviewed with the committee on a regular basis.

50

Monthly / Quarterly Financial Process - We are implementing an improved financial close process and reporting process that includes;
i.Monthly closing calendar supplementing the existing quarterly close calendar.
ii.Monthly closing financial statement review meetings with process owners and financial reporting leadership.
iii.Disclosure committee meetings, which include formal documented quarterly meetings with relevant business unit heads and other corporate functions to ensure all potential issues are escalated and resolved prior to finalizing the financial statements.
iv.The financial statements are reviewed and approved by the disclosure committee, key financial management, legal department, the audit committee and other relevant process owners prior to filing.
v.We have implemented controls to ensure the appropriate foreign currency rates are utilized in the financial reporting close process.
vi.Quarterly, account reconciliations are reviewed and approved in accordance with our Account Reconciliation Policy.
vii.We have implemented controls to ensure the segment and geographic reporting is correct.

We believe that these actions will remediate the remaining material weaknesses, although additional changes and improvements may be identified and adopted as we continue to evaluate and implement our remediation plans. The material weaknesses will not be considered remediated until the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that the controls are operating effectively. In particular, the material weakness for risk assessment and control environment will not be considered remediated until the material weaknesses within revenue, inventory and financial reporting close have been remediated. As a result, until remediated, these material weaknesses could result in material misstatements potentially impacting all financial statement accounts and disclosures in our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 27, 2019, we determined that there was an additional material weakness related to our control environment, as well as additions to the material weakness in the financial reporting close process, as described above.
The remediation activities described below are changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 27, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our ICOFR.

Improvements to Entity Level Controls - We operatedentity and corporate-level controls to support the overall control environment over financial reporting, including enhanced training and development activities around control ownership and operation, improved technologies to facilitate certifications, ongoing documentation and testing efforts, and increased accountability and overall communication.

Specific Analysis of Deficiencies and Identification of Remediation Activities - We implemented a systematic risk-based approach for identifying and implementing remediation efforts to address the six (6) material weaknesses disclosed in fiscal year 2018. We performed a detailed review of all deficiencies that were previously disclosed as material weaknesses: risk assessment, ITGC / user access, revenue, inventory, Germany operations, and the financial reporting close process.


Item 9B. Other Information
None.


PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The information required by this item with respect to our executive officers is set forth in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and information relating to the availability of our code of conduct for executive officers and directors is set out below. The other information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the captions “Proposal One — Election of Directors.” and “Stock Ownership-Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” Our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after September 27, 2019.October 1, 2021.
Code of Conduct
We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of our executive officers and directors. The Code of Conduct is available on our website at http://www.vareximaging.com, and may be found as follows:www.vareximaging.com.
1.    From our main web page, first click “Investors.”
2.    Next click on “Governance Highlights” under “Corporate Governance” in the drop-down menu.
3.    Finally, click on “Code of Conduct.”
We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05(c) of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions by posting such information on our website, specified above.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Executive Compensation.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Equity Compensation Plan Information
    The following table provides information as of October 1, 2021 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
Plan Category (amounts in thousands except per share data)
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (1) (a)
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights (2) (b)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (3) (excluding securities reflected in columns (a) and (b))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders3,891$28.69 4,349
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders— 
Total3,891$28.69 4,349
(1) Consists of stock options, restricted stock units ("RSUs"), and deferred stock units ("DSUs") granted under the Varex Imaging Corporation 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan and the 2020 Stock Plan. Excludes purchase rights under the ESPP.
(2) The weighted average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding RSUs and DSUs, which have no exercise price.
(3) Includes 4,051 thousand shares available for future issuance under the 2020 Stock Plan. Also includes 298 thousand shares available for future issuance under the ESPP. Subject to the number of shares remaining in the share reserve, the maximum number of shares purchasable by any participant on any one purchase date for any purchase period, including the current purchase period may not exceed 2,000 shares.
The information required by this item with respect to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and the security ownership of directors and executive officers is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual
51


Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Stock Ownership”Ownership—Beneficial Ownership of Certain Stockholders, Directors and “Executive Compensation.Executive Officers.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.
The information required by this item with respect to certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” The information required by this item with respect to director and committee member independence is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Proposal One-Election- Election of Directors.”
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the caption “Proposal Four-Ratification- Ratification of the Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

52

Table of Contents
PART IV 
Item 15. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules.
Documents filed as part of this annual report include:
1.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules and Other. All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, or not material or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K.
Exhibit NumberDescription
2.1*
2.2*
2.3*
2.4*
2.5*3.1*
3.1*
3.2*
4.1**4.1
10.1*4.2*
4.3*
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*

10.5*
10.6*++
10.7*
10.8*†
53

10.9*10.7*
10.10*10.8*
10.11*10.9*
10.12*10.10*
10.13*†10.11†
10.14*10.12*
10.15*10.13*
10.16*10.14*
10.17*10.15*
10.18*10.16*
10.19*10.17*†
10.20*10.18*
10.19*
10.21*10.20*
10.22*
10.23*10.21*
10.22*
10.23*

21.1**10.24*†
10.25*†
21.1
54

23.1**23.1
31.1**23.2
31.1
31.2**31.2
32.1**32.1
32.2**32.2
101.INS**101.INSXBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH**101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
*104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibits 101).
*Incorporated herein by reference
**Filed herewith
Management contract or compensatory agreement.
++Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a confidential treatment request filed pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None


55




SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
Date:December 20, 2019November 19, 2021By:/s/ CLARENCE R. VERHOEFShubham Maheshwari
Clarence R. VerhoefShubham Maheshwari
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureCapacityDate
/s/ SUNNY S. SANYAL
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
December 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Sunny S. Sanyal
/s/ CLARENCE R. VERHOEFSHUBHAM MAHESHWARI
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
December 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Clarence R. VerhoefShubham Maheshwari
/s/ KEVIN B. YANKTON
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
December 20, 2019
Kevin B. Yankton
/s/ RUEDIGER NAUMANN-ETIENNEChairman of the BoardDecember 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Ruediger Naumann-Etienne
/s/ JOCELYN D. CHERTOFFDirectorDecember 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Jocelyn D. Chertoff
/s/ CHRISTINE A. TSINGOSTIMOTHY E. GUERTINDirectorDecember 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Christine A. TsingosTimothy E. Guertin
/s/ JAY K. KUNKELDirectorDecember 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Jay K. Kunkel
/s/ ERICH R. REINHARDTDirectorDecember 20, 2019
Erich R. Reinhardt
/s/ WALTER M ROSEBROUGH, JR.DirectorDecember 20, 2019November 19, 2021
Walter M Rosebrough, Jr.
/s/ CHRISTINE A. TSINGOSDirectorNovember 19, 2021
Christine A. Tsingos


56




INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



57



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Varex Imaging Corporation


OpinionsOpinion on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of Varex Imaging Corporation and its subsidiaries(the “Company” (the "Company") as of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018,andOctober 1, 2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings, ofoperations, comprehensive earnings, ofincome (loss), stockholders' equity, and of cash flowsfor each of the three years in the periodyear ended September 27, 2019, includingOctober 1, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidatedfinancial statements”"financial statements").We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 27, 2019October 1, 2021, and September 28, 2018,the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended October 1, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of October 1, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 19, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Inventories – Valuation of Excess and Obsolete Inventories — Refer to Note 1 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its inventories taking into consideration such factors as historical sales and anticipated future sales compared to quantities on hand and the prices the Company expects to obtain for products in its various markets. The Company adjusts excess and obsolete inventories to net realizable value, and write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories are recorded as a component of cost of revenues. As of October 1, 2021, the Company’s inventories, net, were $224.8 million. For the year ended October 1, 2021, inventory write-downs associated with certain discontinued products were $3.5 million. Estimating the amount of excess and obsolete inventories involves significant judgment and estimates.

We identified the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories as a critical audit matter because of management’s significant judgment and estimates in determining the reasonableness of the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories primarily around anticipated future sales. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort.

F-1



How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management’s estimates of the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of controls over the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories. The controls we tested included those over the calculation and accuracy and completeness of underlying data used in the calculation including historical sales and anticipated future sales by product, product quantities on hand, and applicable prices.
We evaluated management’s ability to accurately estimate the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories by comparing actual inventory write-downs to management’s historical estimates.
We performed procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s methods, assumptions, and judgments used in developing their estimate of the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories, which included consideration of historical sales, anticipated future sales, and information obtained from production planning and supply chain employees.
We assessed the reasonableness of the assumptions used in the calculations of valuation of excess and obsolete inventories by developing an independent expectation and comparing our independent expectation to the results of the Company’s calculations.
We tested the mathematical accuracy of the Company’s calculations of excess and obsolete inventories.
We tested the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in the Company’s calculations of the valuation of excess and obsolete inventories, including historical sales, anticipated future sales, quantities on hand, and pricing.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Salt Lake City, Utah
November 19, 2021

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

F-2




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Varex Imaging Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Varex Imaging Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of October 2, 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income (loss), of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended October 2, 2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 2, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended September 27, 2019October 2, 2020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO becausematerial weaknessesin internal control over financial reporting existed as of that date related to (i) ineffective risk assessment process to identify and assess the risks in the Company’s business processes, (ii) ineffective control environment as the Company had an insufficient complement of resources with the requisite knowledge and experience to create the proper environment for effective internal control over financial reporting such that corrective activities to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting are appropriately applied, prioritized, and implemented in a timely manner, (iii) ineffective controls related to accounting for revenue, deferred revenue and related accounts receivable, including maintaining effective business process controls to prevent or detect misstatements in the processing of customer transactions, and the effect of the adoption of and continuous accounting for Revenue from Contracts with Customers, (iv) ineffective controls related to accounting for inventory and cost of revenues, including maintaining effective business process controls to prevent or detect misstatements in the accuracy, valuation, presentation and disclosure of inventory, and (v) ineffective controls over the Company’s financial reporting close process to prevent or detect misstatements in the financial statements, including ineffective business performance monitoring review control over the Company’s international entities, ineffective controls related to elimination of intercompany balances, ineffective controls to identify post-close events which occur before the financial statements are available to be issued, and ineffective controls over the review of the statement of cash flows.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses referred to above are described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered these material weaknesses in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the September 27, 2019 consolidatedfinancial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidatedfinancial statements.

ChangeChanges in Accounting PrinciplePrinciples

As discussed in Note 18Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for revenue effectiveleases as of September 28, 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenues as of September 29, 2018.

Basis for Opinions

Opinion
The Company's management is responsible for these
These consolidatedfinancial statements for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmentare the responsibility of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in management's report referred to above.Company's management. Our responsibility is to express opinionsan opinion on the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.



We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

fraud.

Our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.


As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Direct Conversion AB from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2019 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019. We have also excluded Direct Conversion AB from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Direct Conversion AB is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues excluded from management’s assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended September 27, 2019.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to theconsolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidatedfinancial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Consolidated Financial Statements - Impact of Resources and Controls Related to Risk Assessment and Financial Reporting
The completeness and accuracy of the consolidated financial statements, including the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, is dependent on, in part, (i) designing and maintaining monitoring controls related to the identification and assessment of risk in the business process environment, (ii) designing and maintaining financial reporting controls, including information technology general controls, and financial reporting close controls related to review of international operations, intercompany balances, post-close events and the statement of cash flows, and (iii) maintaining sufficient resources to create the proper environment for effective internal control over financial reporting.



The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the consolidated financial statements - impact of resources and controls related to risk assessment and financial reporting is a critical matter are there was a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to information systems and businesses processes, which affect substantially all financial statement account balances and disclosures. As described above in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, material weaknesses were identified as of September 27, 2019 related to (i) ineffective risk assessment, (ii) ineffective control environment, and (iii) the financial reporting close process. Additionally, as previously disclosed by management, material weaknesses related to (i) information technology general controls and (ii) accounting for the Company’s operations in Germany existed during the year ended September 27, 2019.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included, among others, evaluating the nature and extent of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained. These procedures also included manually testing the completeness and accuracy of system reports or other information generated by the Company's Information Technology (IT) systems.

Revenue Recognition, including Adoption of the New Revenue Accounting Standard
As described in Notes 1 and 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated revenue was $780.6 million for the year ended September 27, 2019. Effective September 29, 2018, the Company adopted the new revenue accounting standard. The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps: identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer, identification of the performance obligations in the contract, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the sale of hardware and services and are recognized net of any value-added or sales tax and net of sales discounts.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to revenue recognition, including adoption of the new revenue accounting standard, is a critical audit matter are there was a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating the audit evidence obtained related to revenue recognition, including the adoption of the new revenue accounting standard. As described above in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, a material weakness was identified as of September 27, 2019 related to the accounting for revenue, deferred revenue and related accounts receivable, specifically including the review of the completeness and accuracy of customer order entry, quantity and pricing, and the effect of the adoption of and continuous accounting for revenue from contracts with customers.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, evaluating management’s process for determining the application of the new revenue accounting standard to the Company’s revenue, evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments, and evaluating the impacts of adoption identified by management. Testing management’s application of the new revenue accounting standard included examining revenue arrangements on a test basis, including assessing the terms and conditions of the arrangement and performing procedures to test the adjustments recorded upon adoption. These procedures also included (i) manually testing the completeness and accuracy of system reports or other information generated by the Company’s IT systems and (ii) evaluating the nature and extent of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained.
Inventories
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated inventory balance was $248.2 million as of September 27, 2019. The Company values inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead and is computed using standard cost (which approximates actual cost) on a first-in-first-out basis. The Company evaluates the carrying value of its inventories taking into consideration such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared to quantities on hand and the prices the Company expects to obtain for products in its various markets. The Company adjusts excess and obsolete inventories to net realizable value and write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories are recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to inventories is a critical audit matter are there was a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence related to the existence and valuation of inventory. As described above in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, a material weakness was identified as of September 27, 2019 related to accounting for inventory and


cost of revenue, specifically including maintaining effective controls related to inventory count procedures, the valuation of inventory at lower of cost and net realizable value, and presentation and disclosure of inventory classifications.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included, among others, performing procedures to test the existence of inventories and evaluating and testing management’s process for determining the valuation of inventories. These procedures also included (i) manually testing the completeness and accuracy of system reports or other information generated by the Company’s IT systems and (ii) evaluating the nature and extent of audit procedures performed and evidence obtained.
Acquisition of Direct Conversion AB - Intangible Assets

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of Direct Conversion AB for net consideration of $79.4 million in 2019, which resulted in $32.9 million of intangible assets being recorded. Those intangible assets were comprised primarily of developed technology of $18.4 million and customer relationships of $9.0 million. Intangibles were valued primarily using a discounted cash flow, which included estimated revenue growth and discount rate.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the intangible assets recorded with the acquisition of Direct Conversion AB is a critical audit matter are there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the fair value measurement of intangible assets acquired due to the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value of the intangible assets. Significant audit effort was required in performing procedures to evaluate the discounted cash flow, the estimated revenue growth, and the discount rate. The audit effort also involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of intangible assets and controls over development of the assumptions related to the valuation of intangible assets, including discounted cash flow, estimated revenue growth, and the discount rate. These procedures also included, among others (i) reading the purchase agreement, (ii) testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of intangible assets, and (iii) testing the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the discounted cash flow and evaluating the reasonableness of significant assumptions, including the discounted cash flow, the estimated revenue growth and the discount rate. Evaluating the reasonableness of the discounted cash flow, including the revenue growth, involved considering the past performance of the acquired business, as well as economic and industry forecasts, and considering whether they were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods and evaluating significant assumptions, including the discount rate.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
November 30, 2020
December 20, 2019

We have served as the Company’sCompany's auditor since 2016.from 2016 to 2020.



F-3

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGSOPERATIONS


Fiscal Years
(In millions, except per share amounts)202120202019
Revenues, net$818.1 $738.3 $780.6 
Cost of revenues546.6 548.1 523.9 
Gross profit271.5 190.2 256.7 
Operating expenses:
Research and development71.9 78.9 78.1 
Selling, general and administrative125.5 142.2 128.1 
Impairment of intangible assets— 2.8 4.8 
Total operating expenses197.4 223.9 211.0 
Operating income (loss)74.1 (33.7)45.7 
Interest income0.1 0.1 0.1 
Interest expense(42.1)(31.4)(21.1)
Other expense, net(3.5)(7.6)(3.2)
Interest and other expense, net(45.5)(38.9)(24.2)
Income (loss) before taxes28.6 (72.6)21.5 
Income tax expense (benefit)10.7 (15.2)5.7 
Net income (loss)17.9 (57.4)15.8 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests0.5 0.5 0.3 
Net income (loss) attributable to Varex$17.4 $(57.9)$15.5 
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to Varex
Basic$0.44 $(1.49)$0.41 
Diluted$0.43 $(1.49)$0.40 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic39.3 38.8 38.2 
Diluted40.3 38.8 38.6 
 Fiscal Years
(In millions, except per share amounts)2019 2018 2017
Revenues, net$780.6
 $773.4
 $698.1
Cost of revenues523.9
 519.5
 444.6
Gross margin256.7
 253.9
 253.5
Operating expenses:     
Research and development78.1
 83.0
 67.3
Selling, general and administrative128.1
 123.4
 102.5
Impairment of intangible assets4.8
 3.0
 
Total operating expenses211.0
 209.4
 169.8
Operating earnings45.7
 44.5
 83.7
Interest income0.1
 0.2
 0.2
Interest expense(21.1) (21.7) (12.3)
Other (expense) income, net(3.2) 2.7
 3.2
Interest and other expenses, net(24.2) (18.8) (8.9)
Earnings before taxes21.5
 25.7
 74.8
Taxes (benefit) on earnings5.7
 (2.6) 22.8
Net earnings15.8
 28.3
 52.0
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests0.3
 0.8
 0.4
Net earnings attributable to Varex$15.5
 $27.5
 $51.6
Net earnings per common share attributable to Varex     
Basic$0.41
 $0.73
 $1.37
Diluted$0.40
 $0.72
 $1.36
Weighted average common shares outstanding     
Basic38.2
 37.9
 37.6
Diluted38.6
 38.4
 38.0

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


F-4


VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGSINCOME (LOSS)


Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Net income (loss)$17.9 $(57.4)$15.8 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap contracts— 0.4 (6.2)
Unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit obligations(0.1)0.6 (1.3)
Foreign currency translation adjustments(0.7)1.5 — 
(0.8)2.5 (7.5)
Comprehensive income (loss)17.1 (54.9)8.3 
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests0.5 0.5 0.3 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Varex$16.6 $(55.4)$8.0 
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Net earnings$15.8
 $28.3
 $52.0
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax:     
Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swap contracts(6.2) 5.2
 0.6
Unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit obligations(1.3) (0.2) 0.2
Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax(7.5) 5.0
 0.8
Comprehensive earnings8.3
 33.3
 52.8
Less: Comprehensive earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests0.3
 0.8
 0.4
Comprehensive earnings attributable to Varex$8.0
 $32.5
 $52.4



See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


F-5

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions, except share amounts)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018(In millions, except share amounts)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Assets   Assets
Current assets:   Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$29.9
 $51.9
Cash and cash equivalents$144.6 $100.6 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.0 and $0.6 at September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively141.0
 154.0
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1.0 million and $0.3 million at October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectivelyAccounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $1.0 million and $0.3 million at October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively155.3 123.8 
Inventories248.2
 235.1
Inventories224.8 271.9 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets19.3
 17.1
Prepaid expenses and other current assets29.5 25.7 
Total current assets$438.4
 $458.1
Total current assets554.2 522.0 
Property, plant and equipment, net142.3
 144.9
Property, plant and equipment, net140.2 145.2 
Goodwill290.8
 243.6
Goodwill292.2 293.1 
Intangibles assets, net86.3
 73.8
Intangible assets, netIntangible assets, net50.7 67.5 
Investments in privately-held companies53.6
 51.0
Investments in privately-held companies49.3 51.3 
Deferred tax assetsDeferred tax assets4.0 0.5 
Operating lease assetsOperating lease assets24.3 27.7 
Other assets27.5
 16.5
Other assets32.6 32.2 
Total assets$1,038.9
 $987.9
Total assets$1,147.5 $1,139.5 
Liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and stockholders' equity   
Liabilities and stockholders' equityLiabilities and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities:   Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$58.2
 $66.3
Accounts payable$58.8 $72.9 
Accrued liabilities75.7
 47.5
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilitiesAccrued liabilities and other current liabilities89.7 70.5 
Current operating lease liabilitiesCurrent operating lease liabilities6.2 6.1 
Current maturities of long-term debt30.7
 25.0
Current maturities of long-term debt2.8 2.5 
Deferred revenues10.5
 13.2
Deferred revenues9.1 8.6 
Total current liabilities$175.1
 $152.0
Total current liabilities166.6 160.6 
Long-term debt, net364.4
 364.8
Long-term debt, net431.7 452.8 
Deferred tax liabilities8.2
 23.2
Deferred tax liabilities2.2 2.3 
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities18.7 23.1 
Other long-term liabilities32.5
 8.5
Other long-term liabilities31.8 34.9 
Total liabilities$580.2
 $548.5
Total liabilities651.0 673.7 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

Redeemable noncontrolling interests10.5
 11.1
Equity:   
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
 
Common stock, $.01 par value: 150,000,000 shares authorized   
Shares issued and outstanding: 38,371,305 and 38,026,597 at September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively0.4
 0.4
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)


0
0Stockholders' equity:0Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issuedPreferred stock, $0.01 par value: 20,000,000 shares authorized, none issued— — 
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 150,000,000 shares authorizedCommon stock, $0.01 par value: 150,000,000 shares authorized
Shares issued and outstanding: 39,435,830 and 39,059,094 at October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectivelyShares issued and outstanding: 39,435,830 and 39,059,094 at October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively0.4 0.4 
Additional paid-in capital371.8
 357.6
Additional paid-in capital449.4 434.4 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(1.7) 5.8
Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAccumulated other comprehensive income— 0.8 
Retained earnings74.4
 62.4
Retained earnings33.5 16.1 
Total Varex stockholders' equity$444.9
 $426.2
Total Varex stockholders' equity483.3 451.7 
Noncontrolling interests3.3
 2.1
Noncontrolling interests13.2 14.1 
Total stockholders' equity$448.2
 $428.3
Total stockholders' equity496.5 465.8 
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and stockholders' equity$1,038.9
 $987.9
Total liabilities and stockholders' equityTotal liabilities and stockholders' equity$1,147.5 $1,139.5 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


F-6


VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Retained EarningsTotal Varex EquityNoncontrolling InterestsTotal Stockholders' Equity
(In millions)SharesAmount
September 28, 201838.0 $0.4 $357.6 $5.8 $62.4 $426.2 $2.1 $428.3 
Cumulative effect of accounting change— — — — (3.5)(3.5)— (3.5)
Net income (loss)— — — — 15.5 15.5 (0.2)15.3 
Exercise of stock options— — 0.8 — — 0.8 — 0.8 
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares0.2 — — — — — — — 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock— — (2.1)— — (2.1)— (2.1)
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan0.2 — 3.8 — — 3.8 — 3.8 
Share-based compensation— — 11.7 — — 11.7 — 11.7 
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax— — — (6.2)— (6.2)— (6.2)
Unrealized loss on defined benefit obligations, net of tax— — — (1.3)— (1.3)— (1.3)
Noncontrolling interest acquired/consolidated— — — — — — 1.4 1.4 
September 27, 201938.4 $0.4 $371.8 $(1.7)$74.4 $444.9 $3.3 $448.2 
Cumulative effect of accounting change— — — — (0.3)(0.3)— (0.3)
Net loss— — — — (57.9)(57.9)— (57.9)
Exercise of stock options0.1 — 1.5 — — 1.5 — 1.5 
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares0.2 — — — — — — — 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock(0.1)— (1.8)— — (1.8)— (1.8)
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan0.2 — 3.6 — — 3.6 — 3.6 
Share-based compensation— — 13.4 — — 13.4 — 13.4 
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax— — — 0.4 — 0.4 — 0.4 
Unrealized gain on defined benefit obligations, net of tax— — — 0.6 — 0.6 — 0.6 
Conversion feature of Convertible Notes, net of issuance costs— — 49.7 — — 49.7 — 49.7 
Purchase of hedges— — (61.0)— — (61.0)— (61.0)
Issuance of warrants— — 49.8 — — 49.8 — 49.8 
Foreign currency translation adjustments— — — 1.5 — 1.5 — 1.5 
Shares issued to settle deferred consideration0.3 — 7.4 — — 7.4 — 7.4 
Reclassification from mezzanine equity to equity for noncontrolling interest in MeVis Medical Solutions, AG— — — — — — 11.3 11.3 
Other— — — — (0.1)(0.1)(0.5)(0.6)
October 2, 202039.1 $0.4 $434.4 $0.8 $16.1 $451.7 $14.1 $465.8 
Net income— — — — 17.4 17.4 0.5 17.9 
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares0.2 — — — — — — — 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock(0.1)— (1.5)— — (1.5)— (1.5)
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan0.2 — 2.8 — — 2.8 — 2.8 
Share-based compensation— — 13.9 — — 13.9 — 13.9 
Unrealized loss on defined benefit obligations, net of tax— — — (0.1)— (0.1)— (0.1)
Foreign currency translation adjustments— — — (0.7)— (0.7)— (0.7)
Other— — (0.2)— — (0.2)(1.4)(1.6)
October 1, 2021$39.4 $0.4 $449.4 $— $33.5 $483.3 $13.2 $496.5 

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-7

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)$17.9 $(57.4)$15.8 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Share-based compensation expense13.9 13.4 11.7 
Depreciation20.5 22.3 23.5 
Amortization of intangible assets16.8 17.2 15.7 
Impairment of intangible assets— 2.8 4.8 
Other assets impairment charges0.5 2.7 — 
Inventory write-down3.5 18.1 3.1 
Deferred taxes(3.0)(3.1)(12.9)
Amortization of deferred loan costs10.0 5.1 2.4 
Loss from equity method investments, net of dividends received3.0 1.3 2.3 
Other, net1.3 4.7 0.8 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable(32.9)17.7 14.8 
Inventories42.8 (42.7)(11.1)
Prepaid expenses and other assets(0.9)(9.3)4.3 
Accounts payable(13.6)14.3 (9.0)
Accrued operating liabilities and other long-term operating liabilities12.2 8.1 10.9 
Deferred revenues0.6 (2.0)(5.2)
Net cash provided by operating activities92.6 13.2 71.9 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(15.1)(23.5)(19.8)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired— (1.6)(69.5)
Investments in privately-held companies(1.4)(1.8)(3.9)
Other0.3 — — 
Net cash used in investing activities(16.2)(26.9)(93.2)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of debt1.5 593.8 85.4 
Repayments of borrowings(33.1)(483.9)(87.0)
Payment of debt issuance costs— (16.7)(0.5)
Proceeds from issuance of warrant— 49.8 — 
Purchases of hedges— (61.0)— 
Proceeds from shares issued under employee stock purchase plan2.8 3.6 3.8 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options— 1.5 0.8 
Taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards(1.5)(1.8)(2.1)
Other financing activities(2.0)(1.7)(0.5)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(32.3)83.6 (0.1)
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(0.1)0.9 (0.7)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash44.0 70.8 (22.1)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period102.1 31.3 53.4 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$146.1 $102.1 $31.3 
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$21.6 $16.7 $19.9 
Cash paid for income tax, net of refunds14.1 4.2 8.2 
Supplemental non-cash activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment financed through accounts payable$1.5 $1.6 $1.8 
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net earnings$15.8
 $28.3
 $52.0
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Share-based compensation expense11.7
 10.0
 8.4
Depreciation23.5
 26.0
 16.9
Amortization of intangible assets15.7
 16.2
 10.5
Impairment of intangible assets4.8
 3.0
 
Other assets impairment charges
 1.3
 
Inventory write-down3.1
 3.1
 
Deferred taxes(12.9) (7.7) (8.9)
Amortization of deferred loan costs2.4
 2.3
 1.8
Loss (gain) from equity method investments, net of dividends received2.3
 (3.9) (1.3)
Other, net0.8
 0.7
 1.8
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:     
Accounts receivable14.8
 9.0
 (23.1)
Inventories(11.1) (2.4) (4.2)
Prepaid expenses and other assets4.3
 2.0
 (10.1)
Accounts payable(9.0) 5.2
 4.9
Accrued operating liabilities and other long-term operating liabilities10.9
 (10.2) 28.1
Deferred revenues(5.2) 2.4
 (1.6)
Net cash provided by operating activities71.9
 85.3
 75.2
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(19.8) (20.4) (20.2)
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired(69.5) (4.8) (271.8)
Investments in privately-held companies(3.9) 
 
Net cash used in investing activities(93.2) (25.2) (292.0)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Net transfers from parent
 
 5.0
Distributions to Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
 
 (227.1)
Taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards(2.1) (2.3) (1.9)
Borrowings under credit agreements85.4
 10.0
 749.0
Repayments of borrowing under credit agreements(87.0) (106.0) (255.0)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options0.8
 3.8
 2.8
Proceeds from shares issued under employee stock purchase plan3.8
 3.3
 
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
 
 2.4
Payment of debt issuance costs(0.5) (0.4) (11.9)
Contributions from noncontrolling partner
 1.8
 
Dividends paid to redeemable noncontrolling interest(0.5) (0.6) 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(0.1) (90.4) 263.3
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(0.7) (0.5) 0.9
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash(22.1) (30.8) 47.4
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period53.4
 84.2
 36.8
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$31.3
 $53.4
 $84.2
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest$19.9
 $19.3
 $9.8
Cash paid for income tax8.2
 13.8
 6.0
Supplemental non-cash activities:     
Purchases of property, plant and equipment financed through accounts payable$1.8
 $2.0
 $4.0
Transfers of property, plant and equipment from Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
 
 15.0
Other non-cash transfers to Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
 
 1.6

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

F-8
  Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Net Parent Investment Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Retained Earnings Total Varex Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders' Equity
(In millions) Shares Amount       
September 30, 2016 
 
 
 526.0
 
 
 526.0
 
 526.0
Net earnings 
 
 
 16.5
 
 35.1
 51.6
 
 51.6
Net transfers from parent 
 
 
 18.4
 
 
 18.4
 
 18.4
Distribution to Varian Medical Systems 
 
 
 (227.1) 
 
 (227.1) 
 (227.1)
Conversion of net parent investment into common stock 37.4
 0.4
 333.4
 (333.8) 
 
 
 
 
Exercise of stock options 0.1
 
 2.8
 
 
 
 2.8
 
 2.8
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares 0.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock (0.1) 
 (1.9) 
 
 
 (1.9) 
 (1.9)
Share-based compensation 
 
 6.2
 
 
 
 6.2
 
 6.2
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax 
 
 
 
 0.6
 
 0.6
 
 0.6
Unrealized gain on defined benefit obligations, net of tax 
 
 
 
 0.2
 
 0.2
 
 0.2
Tax impacts to APIC related to share-based award activity 
 
 2.4
 
 
 
 2.4
 
 2.4
Other 
 
 (0.2) 
 
 
 (0.2) 
 (0.2)
September 29, 2017 37.6
 0.4
 342.7
 
 0.8
 35.1
 379.0
 
 379.0
Net earnings 
 
 
 
 
 27.5
 27.5
 0.3
 27.8
Exercise of stock options 0.2
 
 3.8
 
 
 
 3.8
 
 3.8
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares 0.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock (0.1) 
 (2.2) 
 
 
 (2.2) 
 (2.2)
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan 0.1
   3.3
 
 
 
 3.3
 
 3.3
Share-based compensation 
 
 10.0
 
 
 
 10.0
 
 10.0
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax 
 
 
 
 5.2
 
 5.2
 
 5.2
Unrealized loss on defined benefit obligations, net of tax 
 
 
 
 (0.2) 
 (0.2) 
 (0.2)
Capital contribution by noncontrolling interest 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1.8
 1.8
Other 
 
 
 
 
 (0.2) (0.2) 
 (0.2)
September 28, 2018 38.0
 $0.4
 $357.6
 $
 $5.8
 $62.4
 $426.2
 $2.1
 $428.3
Effect of adoption of ASC 606 
 
 
 
 
 (3.5) (3.5) 
 (3.5)
Net earnings 
 
 
 
 
 15.5
 15.5
 (0.2) 15.3
Exercise of stock options 
 
 0.8
 
 
 
 0.8
 
 0.8
Common stock issued upon vesting of restricted shares 0.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shares withheld on vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (2.1) 
 
 
 (2.1) 
 (2.1)
Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan 0.2
 
 3.8
 
 
 
 3.8
 
 3.8
Share-based compensation 
 
 11.7
 
 
 
 11.7
 
 11.7
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax 
 
 
 
 (6.2) 
 (6.2) 
 (6.2)
Unrealized loss on defined benefit obligations, net of tax 
 
 
 
 (1.3) 
 (1.3) 
 (1.3)
Noncontrolling interest acquired/consolidated 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1.4
 1.4
September 27, 2019 38.4
 $0.4
 $371.8
 $
 $(1.7) $74.4
 $444.9
 $3.3
 $448.2


Table of Contents
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.


VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Description of Business
Varex Imaging Corporation (the “Company,” “Varex” or “Varex Imaging”) designs, manufactures, sells and services a broad range of Medical products, which include X-ray imaging components, including X-ray tubes, digital detectors and accessories, high voltage connectors, image processing software and workstations, computer-aided diagnostic software, collimators, automatic exposure control devices, generators, ionization chambers and buckys, for use in a range of applications, including radiographic or fluoroscopic imaging, mammography, computed tomography, oncology and computer-aided detection. The Company sells its products to imaging system original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) customers for incorporation into new medical diagnostic, radiation therapy, dental, and veterinary, to independent service companies, distributors and directly to end-users for replacement purposes.
The Company also designs, manufacturers,manufactures, sells and services industrial products, which include Linatron® X-ray accelerators, imaging processing software and image detection products for security and inspection purposes, such as cargo screening at ports and borders and nondestructive examination in a variety of applications. The Company generally sells security and inspection products to OEM customers who incorporate Varex’s products into their inspection systems. The Company conducts an active research and development program to focus on new technology and applications in both the medical and industrial X-ray imaging markets.
Varex Imaging Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on July 18, 2016 for the purpose of holding the assets and liabilities associated with the Company's business and separated from Varian Medical Systems, Inc. (“Varian”) on January 28, 2017, upon which Varian completed the distribution of 100% of the outstanding common stock of Varex to Varian stockholders. Following the separation and distribution, Varex became an independent publicly-traded company and is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker “VREX.”
Basis of Presentation and Principle of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are audited and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC and prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”("GAAP"). Prior to January 28 2017, the date of separation and distribution, the financial statements were prepared on a stand-alone basis and were derived from Varian’s consolidated financial statements and records as it operated as part of Varian prior to the distribution, in conformity with GAAP. Prior to the separation and distribution, the consolidated financial statements included allocations of certain Varian corporate expenses these costs were allocated to the Company on the basis of direct usage when identifiable or other systematic measures that reflect utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the Company.
All transactions between the Company and Varian prior to the separation have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All intercompany transactions while the Company operated as part of Varian were considered to be effectively settled for cash and are reflected as a component of financing activities as net transfers from (to) Varian in the consolidated statements of cash flows at the time the transactions were recorded.
Prior to the separation, the Company was dependent upon Varian for its working capital and financing requirements, as Varian uses a centralized approach to cash management and financing of its operations. Financial transactions relating to the Company were accounted for through the net parent investment account. Cash and cash equivalents held by Varian were not allocated to the Company.
Net parent investment in the consolidated statements of equity represents Varian’s historical investment in the Company, the net effect of transactions with and allocations from Varian and the Company’s accumulated earnings.
Reclassification
The Company has reclassified $3.0 million from selling, generalconsolidated all the majority owned subsidiaries and administrative expense to impairment of intangible assets for the year ended September 28, 2018, to conform to the current year's presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net earnings as previously reported.

entities over which we have control. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Segment Reporting
The Company has 2 reportable operating segments; (i) Medical and (ii) Industrial, which aligns with how its CEO, who is the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), reviews the Company’s performance.Industrial. See Note 15.17. Segment Information, included in this report, for further information on the Company’s segments.
Fiscal Year
The fiscal years of the Company as reported are the 52 or 53-week period ending on the Friday nearest September 30. Fiscal year 2021 was the 52-week period that ended October 1, 2021, fiscal year 2020 was the 53-week period that ended October 2, 2020, and fiscal year 2019 was the 52-week period that ended on September 27, 2019. Fiscal year 2018 was the 52-week period that ended on September 28, 2018. Fiscal year 2017 was the 52-week period that ended on September 29, 2017.
Variable Interest Entities
For entities in which the Company has variable interests, the Company focuses on identifying which entity has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the variable interest entity’s economic performance and which enterpriseentity has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefitsresidual returns from the variable interest entity. If the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the variable interest entity will be included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As of September 27, 2019,October 1, 2021, the Company had 2 variable interestinterests in 2 entities, neither of which were consolidated.consolidated by the Company.
 Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Such estimates include the valuation of inventories, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, warranties, contract liabilities, long-lived asset valuations, impairment on investments, valuation of financial instruments, and taxes on earnings.income. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
F-9

Impact of COVID-19
    The coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, the emerging variants and uneven vaccination rates across the globe, and the mitigation efforts by governments to control its spread have created uncertainties and disruptions in the economic and financial markets. The extent to which COVID-19 will continue to impact the Company’s business and financial results depends on numerous evolving factors including: the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, the extent to which it will impact worldwide macroeconomic conditions including interest rates and unemployment rates, the speed of the economic recovery, and governmental and business reactions to the pandemic. The Company assessed certain accounting matters that generally require consideration of forecasted financial information in context with the information reasonably available to the Company, including the estimated future impacts of COVID-19 through the date of filing this report. The accounting matters assessed included, but were not limited to, the Company’s carrying value of goodwill, intangibles, long-lived assets, equity method investments, inventory and related reserves, and allowance for credit losses. The Company’s assessment of the magnitude and duration of COVID-19, as well as other factors, could result in material negative impacts to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods. These future developments are highly uncertain and the outcomes cannot be estimated with certainty. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers currency on hand, demand deposits, time deposits and all highly-liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash and cash equivalents.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily consists of cash collateral related to certain leases and inventory arrangements. Restricted cash is
included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as reported within
the consolidated statements of cash flows consisted of the following:
Twelve Months Ended October 1, 2021Twelve Months Ended October 2, 2020
(In millions)Beginning of PeriodEnd of PeriodBeginning of PeriodEnd of Period
Cash and cash equivalents$100.6 $144.6 $29.9 $100.6 
Restricted cash1.5 1.5 1.4 1.5 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as reported per statement of cash flows$102.1 $146.1 $31.3 $102.1 
 Twelve Months Ended September 27, 2019 Twelve Months Ended September 28, 2018
 Beginning of Period End of Period Beginning of Period End of Period
Cash and cash equivalents$51.9
 $29.9
 $83.3
 $51.9
Restricted cash1.5
 1.4
 0.9
 1.5
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as reported per statement of cash flows$53.4
 $31.3
 $84.2
 $53.4

FairValue
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There is a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or, other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Derivative instruments and hedging activities
The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives designated as a hedge are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheetssheets at fair value as of the reporting date. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive lossincome into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. For derivatives that are designated and qualify as net investment hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss. Timeloss until the hedged item is sold. The portion of the change in fair value
F-10

of the Company's net investment hedges (or cross currency swaps) related to the cross-currency basis spread is an excluded andcomponent in the cash payments are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense.assessment of the effectiveness of these net investment hedges (or cross currency swaps). A qualitative assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed on a quarterly basis, unless facts and circumstances indicate the hedge may no longer be highly effective.effective, in which case, a quantitative assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed.
Concentration of Risk
Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Cash held with financial institutions may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits or similar limits in foreign jurisdictions. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and, except for government tenders, group purchases and orders with a letter of credit, its industrial customers often provide a down payment. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectability of all accounts receivable. The Company obtains some of the components in its products from a limited group of suppliers or from a single-source supplier. The Company has neither experienced nor expects any significant disruptions to its operations due to supplier concentration.
Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition, and collateral is not required. In certain circumstances, a customer may be required to prepay all or a portion of the contract price prior to transfer of control. During the periods presented, one of the Company's Medical segment customers accounted for a significant portion of revenues, which is as follows:
Fiscal Year
202120202019
Canon Medical Systems Corporation17.9 %20.5 %17.3 %
 Fiscal Year
 2019 2018 2017
Canon Medical Systems Corporation17.3% 18.1% 19.3%

Canon Medical Systems Corporation accounted for 10.1%16.2% and 9.8%12.0% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of September 27, 2019October 1, 2021 and September 28, 2018,October 2, 2020, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Costs include materials, labor, external service, and manufacturing overhead
and is computed using standard cost (which approximates actual cost) on a first-in-first-out basis. The Company evaluates the carrying
value of its inventories taking into consideration such factors as historical and anticipated future sales compared to quantities on hand
and the prices the Company expects to obtain for products in its various markets. The Company adjustadjusts excess and obsolete
inventories to net realizable value and write-downs of excess and obsolete inventories are recorded as a component of cost of revenues.
The following table summarizes the Company’s inventories, net:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Raw materials and parts$168.0 $184.6 
Work-in-process20.4 23.9 
Finished goods36.4 63.4 
Total inventories$224.8 $271.9 
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Raw materials and parts$160.1
 $149.9
Work-in-process27.9
 25.4
Finished goods60.2
 59.8
Total inventories$248.2
 $235.1


    As a result of the economic downturn resulting from COVID-19, the Company discontinued certain products and wrote-down inventory associated with these discontinued products by $3.5 million and $15.8 million for the twelve months ended October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively.
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Major improvements are capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation areis computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.assets or remaining lease term. Land is not subject to depreciation, but land improvements are depreciated over fifteen years. Land leasehold rights and leasehold improvements are depreciated over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or remaining lease terms. Buildings are depreciated over twentyup to thirty years. Machinery and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, whicha range from three years to seven years. Assets subject to lease are depreciated over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or remaining lease terms. Estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed and, when appropriate, changes are made prospectively. When certain events or changes in operating conditions occur, asset lives may be adjusted, and an impairment assessment may be performed on the recoverability of the carrying
F-11

Table of Contents
amounts. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts.
The following table summarizes the Company’s property, plant and equipment, net:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Land$8.3 $8.3 
Buildings and leasehold improvements148.7 137.2 
Machinery and equipment179.7 175.5 
Construction in progress18.1 35.4 
354.8 356.4 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(214.6)(211.2)
Property, plant, and equipment, net$140.2 $145.2 
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Land$8.3
 $8.3
Buildings and leasehold improvements134.4
 138.1
Machinery170.7
 166.1
Construction in progress28.5
 23.1
 $341.9
 $335.6
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(199.6) (190.7)
Property, plant, and equipment, net$142.3
 $144.9

The Company recorded depreciation expense of $23.5$20.5 million, $26.0$22.3 million and $16.9$23.5 million, in fiscal years 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. During fiscal yearyears 2021, 2020 and 2019 the companyCompany recorded accelerated depreciation of $0.2 million, $2.9 million and $4.5 million, onrespectively, which primarily related to the machinery and equipment used inat the fabrication of amorphous silicon glass at its facility in Santa Clara, CA.California facility. See Note 4.6. Restructuringincluded in this report, for further information. During fiscal year 2018 the company recorded accelerated depreciation of $4.2 million on the machinery and equipment used in the fabrication of amorphous silicon glass at its facility in Santa Clara, CA. See Note 4. Restructuring, , included in this report, for further information.

Investments
The Company accounts for its equity investments in privately-held companies under the equity method of accounting if the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence in these investments. Distributions received from an equity method investment are classified using the cumulative earnings approach. Under the cumulative earnings approach, which means that distributions up to the amount of cumulative equity in earnings recognized will be treated as returns on investment and classified as operating cash flows and those in excess of that amount will be treated as returns of investment and classified as investing cash flows. The Company monitors thesereviews its equity investments in privately-held companies for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances are other than temporary and makes appropriate reductions inindicate that the carrying values ifamount of the investments may not be fully recoverable. There were no impairments recorded during the fiscal year 2021. During the fiscal year 2020, the Company determines that impairment charges are required based primarily onwrote off a $2.7 million cost investment in a privately-held company, the related expense is included as part of other expenses, net in the Company's consolidated financial condition and near-term prospects of these companies.statements.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Purchased intangible assets are carried at cost, net of accumulated amortization, and are included in intangible assets in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives of primarily two years to seven years using the straight-line method.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill
The Company reviews long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. The Company assesses these assets for impairment based on their estimated undiscounted future cash flows. If the carrying value of the assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the Company recognizes an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets.

The Company evaluates goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually at the beginning of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or whenever an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. The evaluation includes consideration of qualitative factors including industry and market considerations, overall financial performance, and other relevant events and factors affecting the reporting unit. If the Company determine that a quantitative analysis is necessary, the Company performs a step one analysis, which consists of a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit against its carrying amount, including the goodwill allocated to each reporting unit. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units based on a combination of income and market approaches. The income approach is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows of the reporting units, and the market approach is based on a market multiple calculated for each reporting unit based on market data of other companies engaged in similar business. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is in excess of its fair value, step two requires the comparison ofdifference between the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill against theand carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Any excess of the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is recorded as an
F-12

Table of Contents
impairment loss. The impairment test for intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, if any, consists of a comparison of fair value to carrying value, with any excess of carrying value over fair value being recorded as an impairment loss. In fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company performed the annual goodwill impairment test for our 2 reporting units and found no impairment.
During the fiscal yearyears ended October 1, 2021, October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019, and 2018, the Company recognized $4.8$0.0 million, $2.8 million, and $3.0$4.8 million of impairments of intangible assets, related to the restructuring activities see Note 4. Restructuring, included in this report. NaN goodwill impairment charges were recognized for any of the prior periods presented. No impairment charges were recognized in fiscal year 2017.respectively.
Loss Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations, customs and duties audits and other loss contingency matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. The Company accrues amounts, to the extent an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the losses can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are adequate to address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies that it believes will result in a probable loss.
Product Warranty
The Company warrants most of its products for a specific period of time, usually 12 to 24 months from delivery or acceptance, against material defects. The Company provides for the estimated future costs of warranty obligations in cost of revenues when the related revenues are recognized. The accrued warranty costs represent the best estimate at the time of sale of the total costs that the Company will incur to repair or replace product parts that fail while still under warranty.
The amount of the accrued estimated warranty costs obligation for established products is primarily based on historical experience as to product failures adjusted for current information on repair costs. For new products, estimates include the historical experience of similar products, as well as a reasonable allowance for warranty expenses associated with new products. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the accrued warranty costs and updates the historical warranty cost trends, if required.
The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s accrued product warranty:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018
Accrued product warranty, at beginning of period$7.3
 $7.0
Charged to cost of revenues12.9
 11.6
Actual product warranty expenditures(12.1) (11.3)
Accrued product warranty, at end of period$8.1
 $7.3

Revenue Recognition
Effective September 29, 2018, the Company adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. See “Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements” below.
The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the sale of hardware and services. The Company recognizes its revenues net of any value-added or sales tax and net of sales discounts.
The Company sells a high proportion of its X-ray products to a limited number of OEM customers. X-ray tubes, digital detectors and image-processing tools and security and inspection products are generally sold on a stand-alone basis. However, the

Company occasionally sells its digital detectors, X-ray tubes and imaging processing tools as a package that is optimized for digital X ray imaging and sells its Linatron ® X-ray accelerators together with its imaging processing software and image detection products to OEM customers that incorporate them into their inspection systems. Service contracts are often sold with certain security and inspection products and computer-aided detection products.
The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:
Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer
Identification of the performance obligations in the contract
Determination of the transaction price
Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
Recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied
Deferred Revenues
Deferred revenue primarily represents (i) the amount received applicable to non-software products for which parts
and services under the warranty contracts have not been delivered, and (ii) the amount received for service contracts for
which the services have not been rendered.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of customers prior to authorizing shipment for all major sale transactions. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates aged items in the accounts receivable aging report and provide an allowance in an amount deemed adequate for doubtful accounts. If the evaluation of customers’ financial conditions does not reflect a future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions may be needed. We had an allowance for doubtful accounts of $1.0 million and $0.6 million as of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The Company has an equity-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock units to directors, officers and other employees. The Company also permits employees to purchase shares under the Varex employee stock purchase plan. Prior to the separation, the Company’s employees historically participated in Varian’s equity-based incentive plans. Share-based compensation expense through the date of separation included allocations to the Company based on the awards and terms previously granted to its employees as well as an allocation of Varian’s corporate and shared functional employee expenses.
The Company values stock options granted and the option component of the shares of common stock purchased under the equity-based incentive plans and stock purchased under the employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Share-based compensation expense for restricted stock units is measured using the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and is amortized over the award’s respective service period. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of certain assumptions, and changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates of share-based payment awards.
The Company measures and recognizes expense for all share-based payment awards based on their fair values. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings includes compensation expense for the share-based payment awards based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the guidance on share-based compensation. Share-based compensation expense recognized is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest. The Company attributes the value of share-based compensation to expense using the straight-line method. The Company considers only the direct tax impacts of share-based compensation awards when calculating the amount of tax windfalls or shortfalls. For additional information, see Note 13. Employee Stock Plans, included in this report.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included as a component of cost of revenues.
Research and Development
Research and development costs have been expensed as incurred. These costs primarily include employees’ compensation, consulting fees and material costs.

Software Development Costs
Costs for the development of new software products and substantial enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time any additional costs would be capitalized. No costs associated with the development of software have been capitalized, as the Company believes its current software development process is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility.
Taxes on Earnings
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. Deferred income tax liabilities or assets are established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from the differences in financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In addition, we provide reserves for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed by the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of income tax expense.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“U. S. Tax Reform”). U.S. Tax Reform significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure including a lower corporate statutory rate and changes to the way foreign earnings are taxed. U.S. GAAP requires that the impact of tax legislation be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. In accordance with these rules, we are including the impact of certain provisions of U.S. Tax Reform to the extent they are effective during the current reporting period.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company uses the U.S. Dollar predominately as the functional currency of its foreign operations. Gains and losses from remeasurement of foreign currency balances into U.S. Dollars are included in the consolidated statements of earnings. For the foreign subsidiary where the local currency is the functional currency, translation adjustments of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) earnings.
Accounting Standards Recently Adopted
In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (“ASU 2016-18”), which requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change in the total amount of restricted cash during the period and other additional disclosures. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 in the first quarter of 2019 using the retrospective transition method and the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect restricted cash balances. Net cash flows for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 did not change as a result of adopting ASU 2016-18.
The Company adopted ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”), which was issued to reduce the diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 in the first quarter of 2019 retrospectively. Net cash flows for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 did not change as a result of adopting ASU 2016-15.

The Company adopted ASC 606 as of September 29, 2018, using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of that date. The Company recorded a net reduction to retained earnings of $4.1 million, net of tax, as of September 29, 2018 due to the impact of adopting ASC 606. During the second quarter of 2019 the Company recorded an increase to retained earnings of $0.6 million, net of tax, to correct an error that was not quantitatively or qualitatively material to the current period, related to the adoption of ASC 606. The net cumulative impact of adopting ASC 606 was $3.5 million, net of tax. Refer to Note 18.Revenue Recognition, included in this report report for the detailed impact of adopting ASC 606.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends the application of hedge accounting and improves financial reporting of hedging relationships to more accurately present the economic effects of risk management activities in the financial statements. The ASU is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-12 during the quarter ended September 27, 2019, using the modified retrospective method. The adoption did not have an impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Standards Updates Not Yet Effective
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from U.S. federal tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted in December 2017 (the “2017 Tax Act”). ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 which clarified its guidance to simplify the measurement of goodwill by eliminating the Step 2 impairment test. The new guidance requires companies to perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. The amendment will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2021. The amendment is required to be adopted prospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting this amendment to its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." This ASU replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. In addition, the ASU requires new disclosures. This standard will be effective for the Company's interim and annual periods beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2021, and must be applied on a modified retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this standard.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 on accounting for leases. The new standard is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet. The new standard will continue to classify leases as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statement of earnings. The new standard is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective method to each prior reporting period presented with various optional practical expedients. The new standard will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of fiscal year 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company has not completed its assessment of the new standard, but anticipate that the most substantial change to its consolidated financial statements will be a gross-up of its total assets and liabilities. The adoption is not expected to materially impact our results of operations in the upcoming fiscal years and interim periods. The Company will continue to monitor the overall impact of adoption and update our disclosures as appropriate.
2. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Acquisition of Direct Conversion AB (publ)
On April 29, 2019, Varex completed the acquisition of 98.2% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion AB (publ) (“Direct Conversion”) for $69.5 million in cash, net of cash acquired, the assumption of Direct Conversion's debt of $4.5 million and deferred consideration equal to $9.9 million or 0.3 million shares of the Company’s common stock (subject to reduction to settle indemnity claims) to be paid on the first anniversary of the closing with a mixture of cash and shares of Varex common stock. The acquisition of Direct Conversion expands our detector product portfolio to include photon counting technology.  This technology will allow Varex to expand its range of imaging applications and offer new solutions to both Medical and Industrial customers.

The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation:
(In millions)Fair Value
Allocation of the purchase consideration: 
Accounts receivable$2.4
Inventories5.7
Prepaid expenses and other current assets0.7
Property, plant, and equipment0.9
Goodwill47.2
Intangible assets32.9
Total assets acquired89.8
Accounts payable(1.0)
Accrued liabilities(1.5)
Current maturities of long-term debt(1.0)
Deferred revenues(0.9)
Long-term debt(3.5)
Other long-term liabilities(1.1)
Total liabilities assumed(9.0)
Noncontrolling interest(1.4)
Net assets acquired, less noncontrolling interest$79.4
Net cash paid$69.5
Deferred consideration9.9
Total consideration$79.4


The Company recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their preliminary estimated fair values. Intangibles were valued primarily using a discounted cash flow, which included estimated revenue growth and discount rate. Due to the complexity of this transaction as of September 27, 2019, the Company had not finalized the determination of the fair values allocated to various assets and liabilities, including, but not limited to, inventory; deferred tax assets and liabilities; intangible assets and the residual amount allocated to goodwill. The fair value assigned to goodwill is primarily attributable to expected synergies. The goodwill related to the Direct Conversion acquisition is not tax deductible.
The following amounts represent the determination of the fair value and estimated weighted average useful lives of identifiable intangible assets for the Direct Conversion, which are amortized straight-line:
(In millions)Fair Value Estimated Weighted Average
Useful Life
(In Years)
Backlog$0.2
 1
Trade names2.5
 5
Developed technology18.4
 10
In-process research and development2.8
 indefinite
Customer relationships9.0
 10
Total intangible assets acquired$32.9
  


The following amounts represent revenues by reporting segment from Direct Conversion from the acquisition date of April 29, 2019, through September 27, 2019:
(In millions)Direct Conversion Revenue
Medical$4.5
Industrial1.8
Total Direct Conversion revenues$6.3


The acquisition of Direct Conversion did not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations on a pro forma basis for the current or prior years.
Acquisition of Virtual Media Integration
On August 31, 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of Virtual Media Integration, Ltd. (“VMI”) from MISTRAS Group, Inc for $4.8 million. VMI is a provider of computed and digital radiography and X-ray film digitizer systems for industrial non-destructive testing. The acquired assets and liabilities of the VMI business were allocated to the Industrial reporting segment. The acquisition related costs were included in the consolidated statements of earnings under selling, general and administrative expenses.
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation:
(In millions)Fair Value
Allocation of the purchase consideration: 
Accounts Receivable$0.2
Inventories1.0
Other assets0.2
Intangibles1.6
Goodwill1.5
Other liabilities(0.2)
Net assets acquired4.3
Post-closing adjustments0.5
Total cash consideration$4.8

Acquisition of PerkinElmer’s Medical Imaging Business
On May 1, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of the medical imaging business (“Acquired Detector Business”) of PerkinElmer, Inc. (“PKI”) for $277.4 million, or $273.2 million after post-closing working capital adjustments. The acquisition consisted of PerkinElmer Medical Holdings, Inc. and Dexela Limited, together with certain assets of PKI and its direct and indirect subsidiaries relating to digital flat panel X-ray detectors that serve as components for industrial, medical, dental and veterinary X-ray imaging systems. The Acquired Detector Business included about 280 employees, with operations in Santa Clara, California as well as operations in Germany, the Netherlands, China and the United Kingdom. The acquisition of the Acquired Detector Business was pursuant to the Master Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated December 21, 2016 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and between PKI and Varian and the subsequent Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated January 27, 2017, by and between Varian and Varex, pursuant to which Varian assigned and conveyed all of its rights, obligations, title and interest in the Purchase Agreement to Varex.

The following amounts represent the determination of the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities for the Acquired Detector Business:
(In millions)Fair Value
Total cash consideration$273.2
Allocation of the purchase consideration: 
Cash1.4
Accounts Receivable18.7
Inventory34.7
Prepaids and other current assets0.6
Property, plant, and equipment21.4
Other assets, non-current2.0
Intangibles81.1
Goodwill167.3
Total assets acquired$327.2

  
Current liabilities$(17.2)
Other liabilities, non-current(36.8)
Total liabilities assumed(54.0)
Net assets acquired$273.2

The fair value assigned to goodwill is attributable to expected cost synergy opportunities. Included in the goodwill recorded for the Acquired Detector Business is approximately $35 million that will be deductible for income tax purposes in Germany, China and the Netherlands. The remaining goodwill related to the stock acquisition in the United States is not tax deductible. Also, as a result of the acquisition, non-current deferred income tax liability increased by approximately $31 million related to basis differences for both tangible and intangible assets acquired as part of the stock purchases in the United States and the United Kingdom, and asset purchases in Germany, the Netherlands and China.
The following amounts represent the determination of the fair value of identifiable intangible assets for the Acquired Detector Business, which are amortized straight-line:
(In millions)Fair Value Estimated
Useful Life
(In Years)
Favorable leasehold interests$3.8
 16
Backlog1.2
 1
Trade names1.4
 5
Developed technology37.7
 7
In-process research and development4.0
 indefinite
Customer relationships33.0
 7
Total intangible assets acquired$81.1
  

The following amounts represent revenues by reporting segment from the Acquired Detector Business from the acquisition date of May 1, 2017 through September 29, 2017:
(In millions)May 1, 2017 through September 29, 2017
Acquired Detector Business 
Medical$41.1
Industrial20.2
Total Acquired Detector Business revenues$61.3


Unaudited Pro Forma Information
The unaudited pro-forma amounts presented below for the fiscal year 2017 are presented for informational purposes only. In addition to the Company's results for the periods presented, the amounts below also include effects of the Acquired Detector Business as if it had been consummated on October 1, 2016. These unaudited pro-forma results include effects that are directly attributable to the acquisition which include the amortization of intangible assets, interest expense, and other adjustments, including estimated tax effects. The unaudited pro-forma results do not reflect any operating efficiencies or potential cost savings which may result from the consolidation of the Acquired Detector Business and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations of the combined company would have been if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the period presented nor are they indicative of future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been consummated as of October 3, 2015.
 Fiscal Year
(In millions)2017
Revenue$777.8
Operating earnings$84.7
Net earnings$43.1
Net earnings per share, basic$1.15
Net earnings per share, diluted$1.13

3. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Investment in Privately-Held Companies
The Company has a 40% ownership interest in dpiX Holding LLC (“dpiX Holding”), a 4-member consortium that has a 100% ownership interest in dpiX LLC (“dpiX”), a supplier of amorphous silicon based thin film transistor arrays for digital flat panel image detectors. In accordance with the dpiX Holding Agreement, net profits or losses are allocated to the members, in accordance with their ownership interests.
The equity investment in dpiX Holding is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. When the Company recognizes its share of net profits or losses of dpiX Holding, profits or losses in inventory purchased from dpiX are eliminated until realized by the Company. In fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded (loss) and income on the equity investment in dpiX Holding of $(1.1) million, $3.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. Income and loss on the equity investment in dpiX Holding is included in other (expense) income, net in the consolidated statements of earnings. The carrying value of the equity investment in dpiX Holding, which was included in investments in privately-held companies on the consolidated balance sheets, was $48.1 million and $48.9 million at September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively.
In fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company purchased glass transistor arrays from dpiX totaling $23.5 million, $19.3 million and $24.7 million, respectively. These purchases of glass transistor arrays are included as a component of inventories on the consolidated balance sheets or cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of earnings for these fiscal years.
As of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, the Company had accounts payable to dpiX totaling $3.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively.
In October 2013, the Company entered into an amended agreement with dpiX and other parties that, among other things, provides the Company with the right to 50% of dpiX’s total manufacturing capacity produced after January 1, 2014. The amended agreement requires the Company to pay for 50% of the fixed costs (as defined in the amended agreement), as determined at the beginning of each calendar year. As of September 27, 2019, the Company estimated it has fixed cost commitments of $3.7 million related to this amended agreement through the remainder of calendar year 2019. The fixed cost commitment for future periods will be determined and approved by the dpiX board of directors at the beginning of each calendar year. The amended agreement will continue unless the ownership structure of dpiX changes (as defined in the amended agreement).
The Company has determined that dpiX is a variable interest entity because at-risk equity holders, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Majority votes are required to direct the manufacturing activities, legal operations and other activities that most significantly affect dpiX’s economic performance. The Company does not have majority voting rights and no power to direct the activities of dpiX and therefore is not the primary beneficiary of dpiX. The Company’s exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with dpiX is limited to the carrying value of the Company’s investment of $48.1 million and fixed cost commitments of $3.7 million.

In November 2018, the Company and CETTEEN GmbH (“CETTEEN”), formed a German limited liability company that governs the affairs and conduct of the business of VEC Imaging Verwaltungsgesellschaft GmbH (“VEC”), a joint venture formed to develop technology to be used in X-ray imaging components. In accordance with the VEC agreement, net profits or losses are allocated to the members, in accordance with their ownership interest. The Company's investment in VEC is accounted for under the equity method. The Company has made contributions totaling $2.9 million, and has committed to contribute an additional $2.2 million, as milestones are achieved, and to provide certain full time employees to support prototyping and manufacturing activities in exchange for a 50% interest in VEC. CETTEEN made contributions of certain assets including intellectual property in exchange for a 50% interest in VEC. The Company's investment in VEC was $2.0 million as of September 27, 2019.
4. RESTRUCTURING
Following the acquisition of the medical imaging business from PKI in May of 2017, management began a multiyear program to consolidate the acquired operations, reduce costs, improve productivity and realize synergies.
In March 2018, the Company made the decision to transfer the complementary metal oxide semiconductor (“CMOS”) research and development capability from the U.K. to the U.S. and to permanently close the operation of the acquired detector business in London. The company will continue to develop the CMOS technology in the U.S. due to its competitive advantages, product differentiation and future economic benefit. In connection with this initiative, we recorded $1.7 million in restructuring charges during fiscal year 2018.
In July 2018, the Company committed to a plan to relocate the production of amorphous silicon glass for digital detectors, from its Santa Clara facility, to the jointly owned dpiX fabrication facility in Colorado. In July 2019, the Company committed to close its Santa Clara facility and to relocate the remaining production to its other existing facilities. The Company expects operations at the Santa Clara facility to cease by the end of December 2020 and all activities related to the closure of the facility to be complete by the end of March 2021. In connection with the relocation of the glass production and site closure the Company recorded $16.1 million and $14.2 million of restructuring and impairment charges during fiscal year 2019 and 2018, respectively. Fiscal year 2019 intangible asset impairment charges consisted of in-process research and development related to certain projects that were discontinued as a result of the Santa Clara facility closure. Fiscal year 2018 intangible asset impairment charges were related to a favorable leasehold interest that was impaired as a result of the amorphous silicon glass relocation. The Company expects to incur an additional $8.1 million to $12.1 million of restructuring charges through March 2021.
The Company also incurred approximately $2.8 million and $0.8 million of other unrelated restructuring expenses during fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Cash outflows associated with these restructuring charges are limited to employee termination expenses, facility closure and equipment sales and disposals. Below is a detail of restructuring charges incurred during the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, which predominately relate to the Company's Medical segment:
(In millions)Location of Restructuring Charges in Consolidated Statements of Earnings September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Other assets impairment chargesSelling, general and administrative $
 $1.3
Inventory write downsCost of revenues 3.1
 3.1
Intangible assets impairmentImpairment of intangible assets 4.8
 3.0
Accelerated depreciationCost of revenues 4.5
 4.2
Severance costsSelling, general and administrative 6.2
 4.3
Facility closure costsSelling, general and administrative 0.3
 0.8
Total restructuring charges  $18.9
 $16.7


5. OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table summarizes the Company’s accrued liabilities:
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Accrued compensation and benefits$32.1
 $27.0
Product warranty8.1
 7.3
Income taxes payable10.7
 1.4
Payable to Varian Medical Systems
 2.3
Right of return liability6.9
 
Deferred consideration8.9
 
Other9.0
 9.5
Total accrued liabilities$75.7
 $47.5

The following table summarizes the Company’s other long-term liabilities:
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Long-term income tax payable$3.9
 $3.5
Environment liabilities0.9
 1.3
Defined benefit obligation liability5.5
 3.3
Long-term right of return liability19.5
 
Long-term other2.7
 0.4
Total other long-term liabilities$32.5
 $8.5
The following table summarizes the Company’s other income (expense), net:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Income (loss) from equity method investments$(2.3) $3.9
 $1.3
Change in fair value of deferred consideration1.0
 
 
Realized income (loss) on foreign currencies(1.9) (1.2) 1.9
Total other income (expense), net$(3.2) $2.7
 $3.2

6. NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net earnings for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net earnings per common share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities, which is computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common shares, which consists of stock options and unvested restricted stock.


A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share is as follows:
 Fiscal Year
(In millions, except per share amounts)2019 2018 2017
Net earnings attributable to Varex$15.5
 $27.5
 $51.6
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic38.2
 37.9
 37.6
Dilutive effect of potential common shares0.4
 0.5
 0.4
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted38.6
 38.4
 38
Net earnings per share attributable to Varex - basic$0.41
 $0.73
 $1.37
Net earnings per share attributable to Varex - diluted$0.40
 $0.72
 $1.36
Anti-dilutive employee shared based awards, excluded1.9
 1.2
 1.0

The Company excludes potentially dilutive common shares (consisting of shares underlying stock options and the employee stock purchase plan) from the computation of diluted weighted average shares outstanding if the inclusion of the shares underlying these stock awards would be anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
7. FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
As part of the Company’s overall risk management practices, the Company enters into financial derivatives to manage its financial exposures to foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. A qualitative assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed on a quarterly basis, unless facts and circumstances indicate the hedge may no longer be highly effective.    The changes in fair value for all trades that are not designated for hedge accounting are recognized in current period earnings. The Company does not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments in its consolidated balance sheets for presentation purposes.
Credit risk related to derivative transactions reflects the risk that a party to the transaction could fail to meet its obligation under the derivative contracts. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to the counterparty’s credit risk is generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparty’s obligations to the Company exceed the Company’s obligations to the counterparty. The Company’s policy is to enter into contracts only with financial institutions which meet certain minimum credit ratings to help mitigate counterparty credit risk.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Cash Flow Hedges
The Company uses interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges to manage its exposure to fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts hedging variable rate debt effectively fix the LIBOR component of its interest rate for a specific period of time.
As of September 27, 2019, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments:
(In millions, except for number of instruments)Number of Instruments Notional Value
Interest Rate Swap Contracts6 $264.4

The following table summarizes the amount of pre-tax earnings recognized from derivative instruments for the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying statements of operations where the results are recorded for cash flow hedges:

 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
Fiscal Year Ended
 Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
Fiscal Year Ended
(In millions)2019 2018 2017  2019 2018 2017
Interest Rate Swap Contracts$(6.3) $6.9
 $0.6
 Interest expense $1.9
 $0.1
 $(0.3)
The Company expects that $0.1 million of the accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income related to cash flow hedges will be realized in pre-tax earnings over the next 12 months, but the amount will vary depending on interest rates.
These derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements giving effect to rights of offset with each counterparty. None of the balances were eligible for netting. The following table summarizes the gross fair values of derivative instruments as of the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets where the instruments are recorded.
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
(In millions)  September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018   September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedgesBalance sheet location     Balance sheet location    
Interest rate swap contractsOther current assets $
 $2.2
 Other current liabilities $
 $
Interest rate swap contractsOther non-current assets 
 5.5
 Other non-current liabilities (0.5) 
   $
 $7.7
   $(0.5) $

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Net Investment Hedges
The Company uses cross currency swap contracts as net investment hedges to manage its risk of variability in foreign currency-denominated net investments in wholly-owned international operations. All changes in fair value of the derivatives designated as net investment hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income along with the foreign currency translation adjustments on those investments. As of September 27, 2019, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives designated as net investment hedging instruments:
(In millions, except for number of instruments)Number of Instruments Notional Value
Cross Currency Swap Contracts4 $77.7

The following table summarizes the amount of pre-tax earnings recognized from derivative instruments for the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying statements of operations where the results are recorded for net investment hedges:
 Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative
Fiscal Year Ended
 Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
(In millions)2019 2018 2017  2019 2018 2017
Cross Currency Swap Contracts$(0.2) $
 $
 Interest expense $0.2
 $
 $
These derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements giving effect to rights of offset with each counterparty. None of the balances were eligible for netting. The following table summarizes the gross fair values of derivative instruments as of the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets where the instruments are recorded:
 Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
(In millions)  September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018   September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Derivatives designated as net investment hedgesBalance sheet location     Balance sheet location    
Cross currency swap contractsOther current assets 
 
 Other current liabilities (0.2) 
   $
 $
   $(0.2) $


Balance Sheet Hedges
The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge fluctuations associated with foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, primarily cash, third-party accounts receivable, accounts payable, and intercompany receivables and payables. These forward contracts expire within 30 days. These forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment, therefore, the change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded as a component of other income (expense) and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, which are also recorded in other income (expense). The effect of derivative instruments not designated as hedges for fiscal year 2019 was a loss of $1.5 million, which was primarily related to the purchase price hedge established following the announcement of the Company's planned acquisition of Direct Conversion. The Company does not, and does not intend to use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
The following table shows the notional amounts of outstanding foreign currency contracts entered into under its balance sheet hedge program as of September 27, 2019:
 Notional Value of Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
In millionsBuy contracts Sell contract
Japanese yen$0.9
 $
Swiss franc
 (1.0)
Chinese renminbi1.8
 
Euro8.8
 
 $11.5
 $(1.0)


8. BORROWINGS
The following table summarizes the Company's short-term and long-term debt:
 September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
(In millions, except for percentages)Amount Weighted-Average Interest Rate Amount Weighted-Average Interest Rate
Current maturities of long-term debt       
Term facility$29.4
 5.6% $25.0
 4.2%
Other debt1.3
   
  
Total current maturities of long-term debt$30.7
   $25.0
  
        
Non-current maturities of long-term debt:       
Revolving credit facility$59.0
 5.6% $28.0
 4.2%
Term facility308.6
 5.6% 345.0
 4.2%
Other debt2.5
   
  
Debt issuance costs(5.7)   (8.2)  
Non-current maturities of long-term debt364.4
   364.8
  
Total long-term debt, net$395.1
   $389.8
  

Existing Credit Facility
On May 1, 2017 and in connection with the Acquired Detector Business, the Company entered into a new secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million with a five-year term, and a secured term facility (the “Term Facility” and together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Agreement”) in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million. The Term Facility will be repaid over five years, with 5.0% payable in quarterly installments

during each of the first two years of the term thereof, 7.5% payable in quarterly installments during the third and fourth years of the term thereof, and 10% payable in quarterly installments in the fifth year of the term thereof, with the remaining amount due at maturity. Varex used the net proceeds from the Term Facility, and the net proceeds from approximately $97.0 million drawn on the Revolving Credit Facility, to pay the purchase price for the Acquired Detector Business, plus related credit facility fees, and to repay all of Varex’s obligations under the Previous Credit Agreement. Both the Term Facility and Revolving Credit Facility expire on May 1, 2022.
The Credit Agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants that limits, among other things, the incurrence of indebtedness by Varex and its subsidiaries, the grant or incurrence of liens by Varex and its subsidiaries, the entry into sale and leaseback transactions by Varex and its subsidiaries, and the entry into certain fundamental change transactions by Varex and its subsidiaries. It also contains customary events of default and certain financial covenants. The Company agreed to maintain financial covenants, which include maximum consolidated total leverage ratio, maximum senior secured leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditures and a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of September 27, 2019.
The Credit Agreement is secured by the stock and assets of Varex’s material subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement has several borrowing and interest rate options including the following indices: (a) LIBOR rate, or (b) the base rate (equal to the greater of the prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or the LIBOR rate for a one-month period plus 1.00%). Loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate per annum using the applicable indices plus a varying interest rate margin of between 1.75% and 2.75% (for LIBOR rate loans) and 0.75%-1.75% (for base rate loans). The Credit Agreement also provides for fees applicable to amounts available to be drawn under outstanding letters of credit of 0.125%, and a fee on unused commitments which ranges from 0.25% to 0.40%.
On October 3, 2018, the Company, in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, provided notice to the administrative agent that effective as of October 10, 2018, the Company had permanently reducing the revolving credit commitment under the Credit Agreement by $50.0 million to $150.0 million. The reduction in the revolving credit commitment reduced the fees paid by the Company in connection with such commitment.
Subsequent to fiscal year 2019, the Company, in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, provided notice to the administrative agent that effective as of October 8, 2019, the Company was permanently reducing the revolving credit commitment under the Credit Agreement by $25.0 million to $125.0 million.
Subsequent to fiscal year 2019, the Company did not comply with the covenant under the Credit Agreement to timely deliver the Company's fiscal year 2019 annual financial statements. However, upon the filing of this Annual Report with the SEC, the Company will be able to deliver the fiscal year 2019 annual financial statements within the 30-day cure period set forth in the Credit Agreement and consequently no event of default will occur.
At September 27, 2019, the Company had $364.4 million in non-current maturities of long-term debt outstanding, net of deferred debt issuance costs of $5.7 million, and $30.7 million of current maturities of long-term debt outstanding.
Future principal payments of the long-term debt outstanding as of September 27, 2019 are as follows:
(In millions) 
Fiscal years: 
2020$30.7
202134.3
2022335.8
Total debt outstanding400.8
Less: current maturities of long-term debt(30.7)
Non-current portion of long -term debt$370.1


9. FAIR VALUE
Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In the tables below, the Company has segregated all assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
(In millions)Fair Value Measurements at September 27, 2019
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Assets:       
Cash equivalents - money market funds$
 $8.8
 $
 $8.8
Total assets measured at fair value$
 $8.8
 $
 $8.8
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $0.7
 $
 $0.7
Deferred consideration8.9
 
 
 8.9
Total liabilities measured at fair value$8.9
 $0.7
 $
 $9.6

As of September 27, 2019, the total outstanding borrowings under the Company's credit agreement were $395.1 million, net of deferred loan costs, which approximated its fair value because it is carried at a market observable interest rate that resets periodically and is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including bank deposits included in cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, also approximate their fair values due to their short maturities.
There were no financial assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and there were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 during fiscal year 2018.
At September 28, 2018, the Company determined the following levels of inputs for the following assets or liabilities:
(In millions)Fair Value Measurements at September 28, 2018
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level 1)
 Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Total
Assets:       
Cash equivalents - Money market funds$
 $18.4
 $
 $18.4
Derivative assets
 7.7
 
 7.7
Total assets measured at fair value$
 $26.1
 $
 $26.1
Liabilities:       
Derivative liabilities$
 $
 $
 $


10. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table reflects goodwill by reportable operating segment:
(In millions)Medical Industrial Total
Balance at September 28, 2018$147.0
 $96.6
 $243.6
Business combination26.0
 21.2
 47.2
Balance at September 27, 2019$173.0
 $117.8
 $290.8

The following table reflects the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s finite-lived intangible assets included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets:
 September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
(In millions)Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Amount
Acquired existing technology$74.1
 $(28.4) $45.7
 $57.9
 $(21.8) $36.1
Patents, licenses and other12.7
 (8.4) 4.3
 9.9
 (7.4) 2.5
Customer contracts and supplier relationship50.7
 (17.2) 33.5
 42.6
 (11.4) 31.2
Total intangible assets with finite lives137.5
 (54.0) 83.5
 110.4
 (40.6) 69.8
In-process R&D with indefinite lives2.8
 0.0
 2.8
 4.0
 0.0
 4.0
Total intangible assets$140.3
 $(54.0) $86.3
 $114.4
 $(40.6) $73.8
            

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $15.7 million, $16.2 million and $10.5 million in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $4.8 million and $3.0 million in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. These impairment costs were included in the consolidated statements of earnings under impairment of intangible assets.
As of September 27, 2019, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets with finite lives is as follows:
(In millions) 
Fiscal years: 
2020$17.2
202116.3
202214.7
202313.7
20249.1
Thereafter12.5
Total$83.5

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
At September 27, 2019, the Company was committed to minimum rentals under non-cancelable operating leases (including rent escalation clauses) for fiscal years 2020 through 2024 and thereafter, as follows: $7.5 million, $5.4 million, $4.7 million, $1.8 million, $0.9 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. Rental expenses were $5.1 million, $5.3 million, and $4.0 million for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Other Commitments
See Note 3. Related Party Transactions, included in this report, for additional information about the Company’s commitments to dpiX.


See Note 12. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests & Noncontrolling Interests, included in this report, for additional information about the Company’s commitment to the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis.
The Company has an environmental liability of approximately $0.9 million as of September 27, 2019.
Contingencies
From time to time, the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations, customs and duty audits, other contingency matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. The Company accrues amounts for probable losses, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are adequate to address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value). A loss or a range of loss is disclosed when it is reasonably possible that a material loss will be incurred and can be estimated or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss, when material, will exceed the recorded provision. When a loss contingency is probable but not reasonably estimable the nature of the contingency and the fact that an estimate cannot be made is disclosed. See Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies, for further information regarding certain of our contractual obligations and contingencies.
Product Warranty
The Company did not have any contingent liabilities aswarrants most of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018. Legal expensesits products for a specific period of time, usually 12 to 24 months from delivery or acceptance, against material defects. The Company provides for the estimated future costs of warranty obligations in cost of revenues when the related revenues are expensed as incurred.
12. REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS & NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
In April 2019, a subsidiaryrecognized. The accrued warranty costs represent the best estimate at the time of Varex completed the acquisition of 98.2%sale of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion. Astotal costs that the Company has majority voting rights it has consolidated Direct Conversion's operationswill incur to repair or replace product parts that fail while still under warranty.
    The amount of the accrued estimated warranty costs obligation for established products is primarily based on historical experience as to product failures adjusted for current information on repair costs. For new products, estimates include the historical experience of similar products, as well as a reasonable allowance for warranty expenses associated with new products. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the accrued warranty costs and updates the historical warranty cost trends, if required.
    The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s accrued product warranty:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)20212020
Accrued product warranty, at beginning of period$8.1 $8.1 
Charged to cost of revenues13.0 15.1 
Actual product warranty expenditures(12.6)(15.1)
Accrued product warranty, at end of period$8.5 $8.1 

Leases
    The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at the inception of an arrangement. The Company's operating lease right-of-use ("ROU") assets represent the right to use an underlying asset over the lease term and lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets may also include initial direct costs incurred and prepaid lease payments, less lease incentives. Lease liabilities and their corresponding ROU assets are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term, discounted using the Company's incremental borrowing rate ("IBR"). The Company recognizes operating leases with lease terms of more than twelve months in operating lease assets, current operating lease liabilities, and operating lease liabilities on its consolidated financial statementsbalance sheets. The Company recognizes finance leases with lease terms of more than twelve months in property, plant, and recordedequipment, net, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities, and other long-term liabilities on its consolidated balance sheets. For purposes of calculating lease liabilities and the noncontrolling interest. The noncontrolling interest related to Direct Conversion is included in noncontrolling interest in the equity section ofcorresponding ROU assets, the Company's consolidated balance sheet. Earnings representinglease term may include options to extend or terminate the noncontrolling interest's portionlease when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise that option.
F-13

Table of Direct Conversion's income from operations is included in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings.Contents
InRevenue Recognition
    Effective September 29, 2018, the Company entered into a partnership in Saudi Arabia. adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance. The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the sale of hardware and services. The Company has majority voting rights with an approximate 75% interest. Accordingly,recognizes its revenues net of any value-added or sales tax and net of sales discounts.
    The Company sells a high proportion of its X-ray products to a limited number of OEM customers. X-ray tubes, digital detectors and image-processing tools and security and inspection products are generally sold on a stand-alone basis. However, the Company has consolidated the operations of the Saudi Arabia partnership in our consolidated financial statementsoccasionally sells its digital detectors, X-ray tubes and recorded the noncontrolling interests. The noncontrolling interest related to the partner’s 25% interest in the joint ventureimaging processing tools as a package that is included in noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Earnings representing the noncontrolling partner's share of income from operations is included in the Company's consolidated statements of earnings.
In April 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 73.5% of the then outstanding shares of MeVis Medical Solutions AG (“MeVis”), a public company based in Bremen, Germany that provides imageoptimized for digital X-ray imaging and sells its Linatron ® X-ray accelerators together with its imaging processing software and services for cancer screening. In August 2015, the Company, through one of its German subsidiaries, entered into a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (the “DPLTA”) with MeVis. In October 2015, the DPLTA became effective upon its registration at the local court of Bremen, Germany. Under the DPLTA, MeVis subordinates its managementimage detection products to the Company and undertakes to transfer all of its annual profits and losses to the Company. In return, the DPLTA grants the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis: (1) an annual recurring net compensation of €0.95 per MeVis share starting from January 1, 2015 and (2) a put right for their MeVis shares at €19.77 per MeVis share. Upon effectiveness of the DPLTA, the noncontrolling interests in MeVis became redeemable as a result of the put right and were reclassified to temporary equity. As of September 27, 2019, the redemption value of redeemable noncontrolling interests in MeVis was $10.5 million.
During fiscal year 2018, an immaterial number of MeVis’ shares were purchased under the put right. As of September 27, 2019, noncontrolling shareholders together held approximately 0.5 million shares of MeVis, representing 26.3% of the outstanding shares.

Changes in redeemable noncontrolling interests and noncontrolling interests were as follows:
 Fiscal Years
 2019 2018
(In millions)Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
 Noncontrolling
Interests
 Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
 Noncontrolling Interest
Balance at beginning of period$11.1
 $2.1
 $11.2
 $
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests0.5
 (0.2) 0.5
 0.3
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
 1.4
 
 1.8
Dividend distributions(0.5) 
 (0.6) 
Other(0.6) 
 
 
Balance at end of period$10.5
 $3.3
 $11.1
 $2.1

13. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS
Employee Stock Plans
The Company's employees participate in Varex Imaging Corporation 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan (the “2017 Stock Plan”) and Varex Imaging Corporation 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2017 ESPP”) which allows the grants of stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares among other types of awards.
In January 2017, Varex stockholders approved the 2017 ESPP, which provides eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of Varex common stock at 85% of the lower of its fair market value at the start and end of a six months purchase period. The 2017 ESPP provides for the purchase of up to 1000000 shares of Varex common stock.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of earnings is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation expense includes expenses related to the Company’s direct employees. Prior to the separation, Varian also charged the Company for the allocated share-based compensation costs of certain employees of Varian who provided selling, general and administrative services on the Company’s behalf.
The table below summarizes the effect of recording share-based compensation expense and for the option component of the employee stock purchase plan shares:
 Fiscal Year
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Cost of revenues$1.2
 $1.3
 $0.9
Research and development2.2
 1.8
 1.5
Selling, general and administrative (1)
8.3
 6.9
 6.0
Total share-based compensation expense$11.7
 $10.0
 $8.4
(1)Includes allocated share-based compensation of $0.8 million for fiscal year 2017 and represents charges by Varian to the Company for certain Varian employees who provided general and administrative services on the Company’s behalf.
The unrecognized share-based compensation cost as of September 27, 2019 was $23.1 million, and is expected to be recognized in the next 3 to 4 fiscal years. As of September 27, 2019, there were approximately 1.2 million and 0.7 million shares of common stock available for future issuances under the 2017 Stock Plan and the 2017 ESPP, respectively.

The Company utilized the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of stock options granted and the option component of ESPP grants. The Company calculated the fair value of option grants and option component of ESPP grants on the respective dates of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:
 Employee Stock Option Plan Employee Stock Purchase Plans
 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
 2019 2018 2017 2019 2018 2017
Expected term (in years)4.6
 4.8
 4.2
 0.5
 0.5
 0.5
Risk-free interest rate2.5% 2.6% 1.6% 2.5% 2.0% 1.0%
Expected volatility33.9% 31.8% 23.6% 43.9% 34.1% 28.0%
Expected dividend0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Weighted average fair value at grant date$10.19 $11.57 $8.08 $7.81 $8.92 $7.81

Option valuation methods, including Black-Scholes, require the input of subjective assumptions, which are discussed below.
Risk-Free Interest Rate
The interest rates used are based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award.
Expected Term
Options granted generally vest over a period of 36 to 48 months and expire 7 to 10 years from date of grant. Employee stock purchase plan offering periods are 6 months and provides eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of Varex common stock at 85% of the lower of its fair market value at the start and end of a six-month purchase period.
Expected Dividend Yield
The dividend rate used is zero as the Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The Company is also restricted from paying dividends on common stock under its credit facility.
Expected Volatility
Authoritative accounting guidance on stock-based compensation indicates that companies should consider volatility over a period generally commensurate with the expected or contractual term of the stock option. Adequate Company-specific data does not exist for this time period as the Company began trading in January 2017. The volatility variable used is a blended approach by using the Company's historic data for the years it has been publicly traded and a benchmark of other comparable companies’ volatility rates for the prior years.

Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes the activity for stock options under Varex’s employee incentive plans for the Company’s employees:
(In thousands, except per share amounts and the remaining term)Options Price range Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
Outstanding at September 28, 20182,011 $22.63 — $37.60 $30.35
    
Granted297 $31.42 — $31.42 31.42
    
Canceled, expired or forfeited(4) $31.08 — $31.08 31.08
    
Exercised(35) $22.84 — $27.77 23.38
    
Outstanding at September 27, 20192,269 $22.63 — $37.60 $30.60
 4.1 $1,220.3
Exercisable at September 27, 20191,477 $22.63 — $37.60 $29.67
 3.4 $1,220.3
(1) The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, which is computed based on the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Varex common stock of $28.28 as of September 27, 2019, the last trading date of the Company's respective fiscal years, and which represents the amount that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options and sold the shares received upon exercise as of that date.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $3.0 million, $3.1 million and $9.2 million respectively. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the years ended September 27, 2019, September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017 was $0.2 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million respectively
Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Stock Awards and Deferred Stock Units
The following table summarizes the activity for restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and deferred stock units under Varex’s employee incentive plans for the Company’s employees:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Number of Shares Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value
Balance at September 28, 2018641 $33.60
Granted288 31.29
Vested(201) 31.56
Canceled or expired(50) 34.13
Balance at September 27, 2019678 $33.18
The total grant-date fair value of shares granted in fiscal year was $9.0 million, $10.1 million and $11.4 million for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Shares outstanding at September 27, 2019, September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017 had an estimated market value of $19.2 million, $18.4 million and $17.8 million, respectively.
14. TAXES ON EARNINGS
Income tax expense is based on reported income or loss before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences between asset and liability amounts that are recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts that are recognized for income tax purposes. These deferred taxes are measured by applying currently enacted tax laws. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

Taxes on earnings were as follows:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Current provision:     
Federal$9.2
 $(2.1) $24.8
State and local1.3
 (0.3) 1.6
Foreign6.8
 7.5
 5.3
Total current17.3
 5.1
 31.7
Deferred provision (benefit):     
Federal(10.0) (7.0) (7.0)
State and local(1.6) 0.7
 (1.0)
Foreign
 (1.4) (0.9)
Total deferred(11.6) (7.7) (8.9)
Taxes on earnings$5.7
 $(2.6) $22.8

Earnings before taxes are generated from the following geographic areas:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
United States$5.9
 $3.7
 $55.5
Foreign15.6
 22.0
 19.3
Earnings before taxes$21.5
 $25.7
 $74.8

The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate as a result of the following:
 Fiscal Years
 2019 2018 2017
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 % 24.5 % 35.0 %
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit(0.9)% 1.1 % 1.3 %
Revaluation of deferred tax liabilities for US statutory change % (41.8)%  %
Mandatory repatriation tax on foreign earnings1.9 % 13.0 %  %
Domestic production activities deduction % (0.8)% (2.4)%
Research and development credit(10.2)% (11.1)% (2.6)%
Prior year deferred tax adjustments4.7 % 1.9 % (4.0)%
Foreign Rate Difference6 % 0.8 %  %
Change in valuation allowance11.2 % (1.9)% 3.8 %
US Tax Reform - International Provisions(4.7)%  %  %
Other(2.5)% 4.2 % (0.6)%
Effective tax rate26.5 % (10.1)% 30.5 %

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (U.S. Tax Reform) was enacted in the U.S. which significantly revised the U.S. corporate income tax structure. Among the revisions impacting our effective tax rate are a lower U.S. corporate statutory rate going from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and changes to the way foreign earnings are taxed. As a September fiscal year filer, the lower corporate income tax rate is phased in from a U.S. statutory federal rate of 24.5% in fiscal year ending September 28, 2018 to a rate of 21% for the fiscal year ending September 27, 2019.
During fiscal year 2019, the Company’s effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily because of the favorable impact of changes to the U.S. corporate tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform, and U.S. research and development tax credits. These favorable U.S. tax items are offset by losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized and earnings in other foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at higher rates.

During fiscal year 2018, the Company’s effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate primarily because the favorable impact of changes to the U.S. corporate tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform. During fiscal years 2018 and 2017, the effective tax rate also differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate due to increases resulting from U.S. state income tax expense, losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized, earnings in other foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at higher rates, and limitations on the deductibility of officers' compensation. These are offset by decreases due to U.S. research and development credits, tax windfalls for share-based compensation, and the release of a valuation allowance against loss carryforwards in certain foreign jurisdictions.
The SEC issued guidance under Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”) that allows for reasonable estimated amounts to be recorded and a measurement period of up to one year from the date of enactment to revise these provisional amounts as new information is obtained and additional guidance is issued. During the three months ended December 28, 2018, the Company completed its analysis of U.S. Tax Reform, and the accounting for the income tax effects has been finalized for the measurement period under SAB 118, with no significant adjustments from the provisional amounts. During fiscal year 2019, additional U.S. Tax Reform provisions, including GILTI (global intangible low-taxed income), BEAT (base-erosion anti-abuse tax), FDII (foreign-derived intangible income), limitations on interest expense deductions (if certain conditions apply), and other components became effective for the Company and, if applicable, have been included in the calculation of the fiscal year 2019 tax provision. The determination of the tax effects of U.S. Tax Reform may change following future legislation or further interpretation of U.S. Tax Reform from U.S. Federal and state tax authorities.
The guidance for accounting for U.S. Tax Reform requires taxpayers to make an election regarding the accounting for GILTI. This policy election is to either: (1) treat GILTI as a period cost if and when incurred, or (2) recognize deferred taxes for basis differences that are expected to reverse as GILTI in future years. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company has made the accounting policy election to account for GILTI under the period cost method.
Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Deferred Tax Assets:   
Inventory adjustments$5.6
 $4.2
Share-based compensation3.1
 0.8
Product warranty1.6
 1.4
Deferred compensation1.1
 0.9
Net operating loss carryforwards24.3
 3.3
Accrued vacation1.0
 1.3
Credit carryforwards1.9
 1.8
Other7.5
 4.7
 46.1
 18.4
Valuation allowance(18.8) (4.0)
Total deferred tax assets27.3
 14.4
Deferred Tax Liabilities:   
Acquired intangibles(19.3) (15.2)
Property, plant and equipment(10.6) (14.3)
Investments in privately held companies(3.3) (4.1)
Other(2.3) (4.0)
Total deferred tax liabilities(35.5) (37.6)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(8.2) $(23.2)
Reported As:   
Deferred tax assets$27.3
 $14.4
Deferred tax liabilities(35.5) (37.6)
Net deferred tax liabilities$(8.2) $(23.2)

As a result of the changes to the U.S. taxation of foreign earnings included in U.S. Tax Reform, the Company reevaluated its previous indefinite reinvestment assertion with respect to these earnings during fiscal year 2018, which resulted in the Company revoking its assertion for current and future earnings for all countries, while maintaining the assertion that historic earnings are

indefinitely reinvested outside the U.S. The Company has modified this prior assertion for the year ended September 27, 2019 with respect to the acquisition of Direct Conversion. The modification was to assert that all earnings for Direct Conversion, located primarily in Sweden and Finland, are indefinitely reinvested in those countries. Due to the level of earnings available for repatriation, the treaty benefits applicable to jurisdictions in which those earnings are located, and the now favorable U.S. tax treatment of repatriated foreign earnings, the amount of deferred tax liability recorded related to the potential repatriation is approximately $0.1 million. This estimated liability is for U.S. State income taxes and foreign withholding taxes that would apply if the foreign earnings were actually repatriated in the form of a dividend.
As of September 27, 2019, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24.3 million with $4.4 million expiring between 2020 and 2030 and $19.9 million carried forward indefinitely.
The valuation allowance relates primarily to net operating losses in certain foreign jurisdictions where, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit of the net operating losses will not be realized. The valuation allowance increased by $14.8 million during fiscal year 2019 and decreased by $0.3 million during fiscal year 2018. The increase during the current year was primarily related to the acquisition of Direct Conversion that included deferred tax assets subject to a valuation allowance as of acquisition. Changes in the Company's valuation allowance for deferred tax assets were as follows:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Valuation allowance balance–beginning of fiscal year$4.0
 $4.3
 $2.5
Increases resulting from business combinations12.0
 
 
Other increases2.8
 2.2
 2.5
Other decreases
 (2.5) (0.7)
Valuation allowance balance—end of fiscal year$18.8
 $4.0
 $4.3

During fiscal year 2019, the Company paid U.S and foreign taxes of approximately $8.2 million. In fiscal year 2018, the Company paid U.S. and foreign taxes of approximately $13.8 million.
The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes following a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining whether the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that, based on the technical merits, the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement.
Changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
 Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018
Unrecognized tax benefits balance–beginning of fiscal year$0.6
 $0.5
Subtractions based on tax positions related to a prior year(0.2) 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0.2
 0.1
Unrecognized tax benefits balance—end of fiscal year$0.6
 $0.6

As of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, all of which would affect the effective tax rate if recognized.
The Company includes interest and penalties related to income taxes within taxes on earnings on the Combined Statements of Earnings. For the year ended September 27, 2019, $0.1 million interest and penalties have been included for this period. For the year ended September 28, 2018 any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are minimal and have been included in the balance for that period.
The Company files U.S. Federal and state income tax returns and non-U.S. income tax returns in various jurisdictions. All of these returns are subject to examination by their respective taxing jurisdictions from the date of filing through each applicable statute of limitation period. The Company’s significant operations up to the date of separation have historically been included in Varian’s U.S. federal and state income tax returns and non-U.S. jurisdiction tax returns. Material liabilities arising related to the pre-spin operations

would be the responsibility of Varian. Other periods for entities acquired are still open and subject to examination. Generally, periods prior to 2009 are no longer subject to examination.
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has 2 reportable operating segments Medical and Industrial. The segments align the Company’s products and service offerings with customer use in medical and industrial markets and are consistent with how the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is also its CODM, evaluates the business for the allocation of resources. The CODM allocates resources to and evaluates the financial performance of each operating segment primarily based on revenues and gross margin. The operating and reportable segment structure provides alignment between business strategies and operating results.
Description of Segments
The Medical segment designs, manufactures, sells and services X-ray imaging components for use in a range of applications, including radiographic and fluoroscopic imaging, mammography, computed tomography, radiation therapy and computer-aided detection. The Company provides a broad range of X-ray imaging components for Medical customers including X-ray tubes, digital flat panel detectors, generators, high voltage connectors, image-processing software and workstations, computer-aided diagnostic software, collimators, automatic exposure control devices, generators, ionization chambers and buckys. The Company’s X-ray imaging components are primarily sold to imaging system OEM customers that incorporate them into their medical diagnostic, radiation therapy, dental, veterinaryinspection systems. Service contracts are often sold with certain security and industrial imaging systems.inspection products and computer-aided detection products.
    The Company also sells its X-ray imaging components to independent service companies, distributors and directly to end-users for replacement purposes.
The Industrial segment designs, manufactures, sells and services products for use in the security and industrial inspection applications, such as airport security, cargo screening at ports and borders and nondestructive examination in a variety of applications. The products include Linatron X-ray accelerators, X-ray tubes, digital flat panel detectors, high voltage connectors and image processing software that we generally sell to OEM customers that incorporate these products into their inspection systems.
Accordingly,determines revenue recognition through the following information is provided for purposes of achieving an understanding of operations, but it may not be indicative of the financial results of the reported segments were they independent organizations. In addition, comparisons of the Company’s operations to similar operations of other companies may not be meaningful.
Information related to the Company’s segments is as follows:
 Fiscal Year
(In millions)2019 2018 2017
Revenues     
Medical$596.8
 $602.0
 $556.9
Industrial183.8
 171.4
 141.2
Total revenues780.6
 773.4
 698.1
Gross margin     
Medical188.9
 190.5
 193.6
Industrial67.8
 63.4
 59.9
Total gross margin256.7
 253.9
 253.5
Total operating expenses211.0
 209.4
 169.8
Interest and other expenses, net(24.2) (18.8) (8.9)
Earnings before taxes21.5
 25.7
 74.8
Taxes (benefit) on earnings5.7
 (2.6) 22.8
Net earnings15.8
 28.3
 52.0
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests0.3
 0.8
 0.4
Net earnings attributable to Varex$15.5
 $27.5
 $51.6


steps:
The following table summarizes the Company’s total assets by its reportable segments:
(In millions)September 27, 2019 September 28, 2018
Identifiable assets:   
Medical$794.3
 $770.6
Industrial244.6
 217.3
Total reportable segments$1,038.9
 $987.9

Geographic Information
 Revenues Property, plant and equipment, net
 Fiscal Years Fiscal Years
(In millions)2019 2018 2017 2019 2018
United States$275.3
 $268.8
 $231.9
 $122.6
 $127.9
Latin America7.3
 7.0
 7.9
 
 
EMEA269.0
 254.5
 219.5
 11.4
 8.7
APAC229.0
 243.1
 238.8
 8.3
 8.3
Total company$780.6
 $773.4
 $698.1
 $142.3
 $144.9

The Company operates various manufacturing and marketing operations outside the United States. Latin America includes Brazil and Mexico. EMEA includes Europe, Russia, the Middle East, India and Africa. APAC includes Asia and Australia. Revenues by region are based on the known final destination of products sold.
16. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Varex’s 401(k) plan became effective on January 1, 2017. Varex’s 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code and intended for all full-time employees in the United States. This plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their pretax salary up to the maximum dollar limitation prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. Prior to Varex's 401(k) plan becoming effective, Company employees participated in Varian's 401(k) plan. The Company made matching contributions to the plan totaling $6.7 million, $6.5 million and $4.3 million in fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The Company also maintains defined benefit plans for employees located outside the US. The net pension liability is included in non-current liability on the Company's consolidated balance sheets and totaled $5.5 million and $3.3 million as of September 27, 2019 and September 28, 2018, respectively. The Company’s net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit plans was not material for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017.
17. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table presents the changes in the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss):
(In millions)Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments Unrealized Gain on Defined Benefit Obligations Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Balance at September 28, 2018$5.8
 $
 $5.8
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications(8.3) (1.9) (10.2)
Income tax benefit2.1
 0.6
 2.7
Balance at September 27, 2019$(0.4) $(1.3) $(1.7)
      

NaN amounts were reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income during fiscal years 2019 and 2018.


18. REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company adopted ASC 606 on September 29, 2018, using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. The reported results for fiscal year 2019 reflect the application of ASC 606 guidance while the reported results for fiscal year 2018 were prepared under the guidance of ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition.” The primary impacts of the adoption include: (1) recording a separate contract liability and contract asset related to the sale of X-ray tubes that were sold with an option for the customer to require the Company to repurchase specific parts of the X‑ray tube at a specific price; and (2) recording a liability related to the deferral of revenue for service type warranties that are provided to certain customers who purchase Linatron® X-ray accelerators.
The Company has made the following accounting policy elections and elected to use certain practical expedients, as permitted by the FASB, in applying ASC 606: (1) the Company accounts for amounts collected from customers for sales and other taxes, net of related amounts remitted to tax authorities; (2) the Company does not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component, if, at contract inception, the Company expects the period between the time when the Company transfers a promised good or service to the customer and the time when the customer pays for that good or service will be one year or less; (3) the Company expenses costs to obtain a contract as they are incurred if the expected period of benefit, and therefore the amortization period, is one year or less; (4) the Company accounts for shipping and handling activities that occur after control transfers to the customer as a fulfillment cost rather than an additional promised service and these fulfillment costs are included as a component of cost of revenues; and (5) the Company does not assess whether promised goods or services are performance obligations if they are immaterial in the contextIdentification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer
Identification of the customer.performance obligations in the contract
Determination of the transaction price
Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
Recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied

Transaction price and allocation to performance obligations
Transaction prices of products or services are typically based on contracted rates. To the extent that the transaction price includes variable consideration, the Company estimates the amount of variable consideration that should be included in the transaction price utilizing the expected value method when there is a large number of transactions with similar characteristics or the most likely amount method when there are two possible outcomes, depending on the circumstances of the transaction, to which the Company expects to be entitled. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price if, in the Company’s judgment, it is probable that a significant future reversal of cumulative revenue under the contract will not occur. Estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of the Company’s anticipated performance and all information (historical, current and forecasted) that is reasonably available.
The Company allows customers to return specific parts of purchased X-ray tubes for a partial refund credit, which is identified as variable consideration. ASC 606-10-55-23 requires that forFor sales with a right of return, revenue is reduced for expected returns, a liability is recorded for expected returns, and an asset is recorded for the right to recover products from customers on settling the liability. The Company recognizes a reduction to revenue and cost of sales at the time of sale and a corresponding contract liability and contract asset. The Company records this estimate based on the historical volume of product returns and adjusts the estimate on a quarterly basis based on the current quarter sales and current quarter returns.
If a contract contains a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation. Contracts that contain multiple performance obligations require an allocation of the transaction price based on the estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised products or services underlying each performance obligation. The Company determines standalone selling prices based on the price at which the performance obligation is sold separately.
The beginning net cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet for the adoption of ASC 606 is as follows:
 Balance at Adjustment Due to Balance at
(In millions)September 28, 2018 ASC 606 September 29, 2018
Assets:     
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$17.1
 $6.4
 $23.5
Other assets16.5
 18.0
 34.5
Liabilities and Equity:     
Deferred revenues13.2
 0.3
 13.5
Accrued liabilities47.5
 7.1
 54.6
Deferred tax liabilities23.2
 (0.8) 22.4
Other long-term liabilities8.5
 21.3
 29.8
Retained earnings62.4
 (3.5) 58.9

The following tables compare the reported consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations for fiscal year ended September 27, 2019, to the amounts that would have been reported if ASC 605 had been in effect:
 September 27, 2019
(In millions)Balance without Adoption As Reported
Assets:   
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$13.1
 $19.3
Other assets$10.0
 $27.5
Liabilities and equity:   
Deferred revenues$9.9
 $10.5
Accrued liabilities$68.8
 $75.7
Deferred tax liabilities$9.1
 $8.2
Other long-term liabilities$12.1
 $32.5
Retained earnings$77.7
 $74.4

 Twelve Months Ended September 27, 2019
(In millions)Balance without Adoption As Reported
Revenues781.2
 780.6
Cost of revenues524.7
 523.9
Taxes on earnings5.7
 5.7
Net earnings attributable to Varex15.3
 15.5

Contracts and performance obligations
The Company accounts for a contract with a customer when there is an approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of the consideration is probable. The Company's performance obligations consist mainly of transferring control of products and services identified in the contracts or purchase orders. For each contract, the Company considers the obligation to transfer products and services to the customer, which are distinct, to be performance obligations.
Revenue recognitionRecognition of revenue
Revenue is recognized when, or as, obligations under the terms of a contract are satisfied, which occurs when control of the promised products or services is transferred to customers. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring products or services to a customer.
Product revenue is generally recognized when the customer obtains control of the Company’s product, which occurs at a point in time, and may be upon shipment or upon delivery based on the contractual shipping terms of a contract.
F-14

Table of Contents
Service revenue is generally recognized over time as the services are rendered to the customer based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. The Company recognizes service revenue over the term of the service contract. Services are expected to be transferred to the customer throughout the term of the contract and the Company believes recognizing revenue ratably over the term of the contract best depicts the transfer of value to the customer.
Disaggregation of Revenue
Revenue is disaggregated from contracts between geography and by reportable operating segment, which the Company believes best depicts how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Refer to Note 15.17. Segment Information, included in this report, for the disaggregation of the Company’s revenue based on reportable operating segments and disaggregated by geographic region.    

Contract Balances
Contract assets are included within the prepaidPrepaid expenses and other current assets, and otherOther assets balances.balances in the consolidated balance sheets. Contract liabilities, which also includes refund obligations, are included within the accruedAccrued liabilities deferredand other current liabilities, Deferred revenues, and otherOther long-term liabilities balances. The following table summarizes the changesbalances in the contract assets and refund liabilities for the twelve months ended September 27, 2019:
(In millions)Contact Assets
Balance at September 29, 2018$24.4
Costs recovered from product returns during the period(6.4)
Contract asset from shipments of products, subject to return during the period5.7
Balance at September 27, 2019$23.7
(In millions)Refund Liabilities
Balance at September 29, 2018$27.1
Recognition of revenue included in beginning of year refund liability(7.0)
Additions to refund liabilities6.3
Balance at September 27, 2019$26.4

Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized. As of September 27, 2019, total remaining performance obligations amounted to $265.2 million. The Company expects to recognize a majority of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 months.consolidated balance sheets.
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Customer Contract
The Company has certain costs to obtain and fulfill a customer contract, such as commissions and shipping costs. The Company recognizes the incremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense when incurred if the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. Incremental costs of obtaining contracts that would be recognized over greater than one year are not material. The Company accounts for shipping and handling activities related to contracts with customers as costs to fulfill the promise to transfer the associated products. These costs are included as a component of cost of revenues.
Deferred Revenues
19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS    Deferred revenue primarily represents (i) the amount received applicable to non-software products for which parts
and services under the warranty contracts have not been delivered, and (ii) the amount received for service contracts for
which the services have not been rendered.
Allowance for Credit Losses
    The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of customers prior to authorizing shipment for all major sale transactions. On a quarterly basis, the Company considers historical trends, current information and any reasonable and supportable forecasts to determine if an amount should be included in the allowance for credit losses. The Company had an allowance for credit losses of $1.0 million and $0.3 million as of October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively.
Share-Based Compensation Expense
    The Company has an equity-based incentive plan that provides for the grant of nonqualified stock options and restricted stock units to directors, officers and other employees. The Company also permits employees to purchase shares under the Varex employee stock purchase plan.
    The Company values stock options granted and the option component of the shares of common stock purchased under the equity-based incentive plans and stock purchased under the employee stock purchase plan using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Share-based compensation expense for restricted stock units is measured using the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant and is amortized over the award’s respective service period. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the input of certain assumptions, and changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates of share-based payment awards.
    The Company measures and recognizes expense for all share-based payment awards based on their fair values. Share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations includes compensation expense for the share-based payment awards based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the guidance on share-based compensation. The Company records forfeitures as they occur. The Company attributes the value of share-based compensation to expense using the straight-line method. The Company considers only the direct tax impacts of share-based compensation awards when calculating the amount of tax windfalls or shortfalls. For additional information, see Note 15. Employee Stock Plans, included in this report.
F-15

Table of Contents
Software Development Costs
    Costs for the development of new software products and substantial enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established, at which time any additional costs would be capitalized. No costs associated with the development of software have been capitalized, as the Company believes its current software development process is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility.
Research and Development
    Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. These costs primarily include employees’ compensation, consulting fees and material costs.
Taxes on Income
    Current income tax expense or benefit is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable or receivable for the current year. Deferred income tax liabilities or assets are established for the expected future tax consequences resulting from the differences in financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Future changes in tax regulation can have a material impact, including tax rate changes or the realization of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is provided if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. U.S. Tax Reform introduced a limitation of business interest deduction under IRC Section 163(j), which may be difficult to utilize without significant taxable income. Also, net operating loss carryforwards in jurisdictions with current losses provide uncertainty for realization. In addition, we provide reserves for uncertain tax positions when such tax positions do not meet the recognition thresholds or measurement standards prescribed by the authoritative guidance for accounting for income taxes. A portion of the U.S. general business tax credits for research outside of the financial statement line for research and development ("R&D") have a small degree of uncertainty. A reasonable reserve is maintained on the uncertain portion until either the Internal Revenue Service chooses to audit, or the statute of limitation expires. A reserve for R&D is typical for companies who calculate and utilize this general business credit. Amounts for uncertain tax positions are adjusted in periods when new information becomes available or when positions are effectively settled. Interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are recognized as a component of income tax expense.
    On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permits net operating loss ("NOL") carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. On July 2, 2020, the US Treasury Department issued a regulation providing an election to waive NOL carryback to a former consolidated group. During fiscal year 2021, the Company filed NOL carryback claims for U.S. losses incurred in fiscal year 2020 and anticipates cash tax refunds on those claims.
Foreign Currency Translation
    The Company uses the U.S. Dollar predominately as the functional currency of its foreign operations. Gains and losses from remeasurement of foreign currency balances into U.S. Dollars are included in the consolidated statements of operations. For the foreign subsidiaries where the local currency is the functional currency, translation adjustments of foreign currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are recorded to a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
    In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This pronouncement changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments, including trade and other receivables, held-to-maturity debt securities and loans and replaces the incurred loss methodology with a new, forward-looking “expected loss” model that considers the risk of loss over the asset’s contractual life, even if remote, historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future relevant events. The Company adopted this ASU on October 3, 2020, using a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
F-16

Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Standards Updates Not Yet Effective
    In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The standard removes certain separation models in ASC 470-20 for convertible instruments, and, as a result, embedded conversion features are no longer separated from the host contract for convertible instruments with conversion features that are not required to be accounted for as derivatives under ASC 815. The convertible debt instruments will be accounted for as a single liability measured at amortized cost. This will also result in the interest expense recognized for convertible debt instruments to be typically closer to the coupon interest rate. Further, the ASU made amendments to the earnings per share (“EPS”) guidance in Topic 260 for convertible instruments, the most significant impact of which is requiring the use of the if-converted method for diluted EPS calculation, and no longer allowing the net share settlement method. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Adoption of the ASU can either be on a modified retrospective or full retrospective basis. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
    In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, to provide optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate (e.g., LIBOR) reform on financial reporting. Adoption of the guidance is elective and is permitted from March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company will evaluate transactions or contract modifications occurring as a result of reference rate reform and determine whether to apply the optional guidance on an ongoing basis. The Company does not expect that the new guidance will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.    
    In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the current guidance, and improving the consistent application of and simplification of other areas of the guidance. The standard is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2022. The Company does not expect that the new guidance will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
2. REVENUE RECOGNITION
    The following tables summarize the changes in the contract assets and refund liabilities for the twelve months ended October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020:
(In millions)Contract Assets
Balance at September 27, 2019$23.7 
Costs recovered from product returns during the period(5.6)
Contract asset from shipments of products, subject to return during the period6.5 
Balance at October 2, 2020$24.6 
Costs recovered from product returns during the period(4.8)
Contract asset from shipments of products, subject to return during the period6.4 
Adjustment for actual vs reserved product returns(1.9)
Balance at October 1, 2021$24.3 
(In millions)Refund Liabilities
Balance at September 27, 2019$26.4 
Release of refund liability included in beginning of year refund liability(6.2)
Additions to refund liabilities7.2 
Balance at October 2, 2020$27.4 
Release of refund liability included in beginning of year refund liability(5.3)
Additions to refund liabilities7.1 
Adjustment for actual vs reserved product returns(2.2)
Balance at October 1, 2021$27.0 
F-17

Table of Contents
    During fiscal year 2021, the Company recognized revenue of $6.9 million related to deferred revenue which existed at October 2, 2020. During fiscal year 2020, the Company recognized revenue of $8.4 million related to deferred revenue which existed at September 27, 2019.
Remaining Performance Obligations
    Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price of firm orders for which revenue has not yet been recognized, which are primarily related to contracts where control will be transferred to customers over the next 12 months. See Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for details on the nature of the remaining performance obligations within these contracts and how they will be resolved.
3. LEASES
    On September 28, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842, which amends the guidance for the accounting and reporting of leases. The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is performed at the inception of the arrangement. The Company has operating and finance leases for office space, warehouse and manufacturing space, vehicles, and certain equipment. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees, variable lease costs, bargain purchase options or restrictive covenants. The Company does not have any lease transactions with related parties. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are generally not recorded on the balance sheet and expense for these leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company's leases have remaining lease terms of one year to approximately six years, some of which may include options to extend the leases for up to six years and some include options to terminate early. These options have been included in the determination of the lease liability when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised.
    Right-of-use assets represent the Company's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease contract. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of fixed lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company's incremental borrowing rate is based on a credit-adjusted risk-free rate, which best approximates a secured rate over a similar term of lease.
    The following table presents supplemental balance sheet information related to the Company's operating and finance leases:
(In millions)Balance Sheet LocationOctober 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Assets
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease assets$24.3 $27.7 
Finance lease right-of-use assetsProperty, plant and equipment, net0.5 0.5 
Liabilities
Operating lease liabilities (current)Current operating lease liabilities6.2 6.1 
Finance lease liabilities (current)Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities0.2 0.2 
Operating lease liabilities (non-current)Operating lease liabilities18.7 23.1 
Finance lease liabilities (non-current)Other long-term liabilities$0.3 $0.4 
    The following table presents the weighted average remaining lease term and discount rate information related to the Company's operating and finance leases:
F-18

Table of Contents
October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Operating lease weighted average remaining lease term (in years)5.96.6
Operating lease weighted average discount rate5.5 %4.5 %
Finance lease weighted average remaining lease term (in years)2.53.3
Finance lease weighted average discount rate3.6 %4.1 %
    The following table provides information related to the Company’s operating and finance leases:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Total operating lease costs (a)$8.1 $8.4 
Total finance lease costs$0.3 $0.3 
Operating cash flows from operating leases$7.9 $8.0 
Financing cash flows from finance leases0.2 0.3 
Total cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities$8.1 $8.3 
Noncash operating right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (b)$5.6 $10.6 
Noncash finance right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (b)0.2 0.2 
Total right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (b)$5.8 $10.8 
(a) Includes variable and short-term lease expense, which were immaterial for fiscal year 2021 and 2020.
(b) Excludes the impact of adopting the new leases standard in the first quarter of 2020.
    For fiscal year 2019, the Company's lease expense was $5.1 million.
    As of October 1, 2021, maturities of operating lease and finance lease liabilities for each of the following five years and a total thereafter were as follows:
(In millions)
Fiscal years:Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2022$7.4 $0.2 
20234.9 0.2 
20244.1 0.1 
20253.9 — 
20262.4 — 
Thereafter6.7 — 
Total future lease payments$29.4 $0.5 
Less: imputed interest(4.5)— 
Present value of lease liabilities$24.9 $0.5 
As of October 1, 2021, the Company had not entered into any material leases that have not yet commenced.
4. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
Acquisition of Direct Conversion AB
    In April 2019, Varex completed the acquisition of 98.2% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion AB (publ) (“Direct Conversion”). In April 2021, the Company acquired all of the remaining shares representing the noncontrolling interests in Direct Conversion such that the Company now owns 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion. The acquisition of Direct Conversion expanded our detector product portfolio to include photon counting technology.
F-19

Table of Contents
This technology allows Varex to expand its range of imaging applications and offer new solutions to both Medical and Industrial customers.
    The following amounts represent revenues by reporting segment from Direct Conversion from the acquisition date of April 29, 2019, through September 27, 2019:
(In millions)Direct Conversion Revenue
Medical$4.5 
Industrial1.8 
Total Direct Conversion revenues$6.3 

    The acquisition of Direct Conversion did not have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated results of operations on a pro forma basis for fiscal year 2019.
5. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Investment in Privately-Held Companies
    The Company has a 40% ownership interest in dpiX Holding LLC (“dpiX Holding”), a holding company that has a 100% ownership interest in dpiX LLC (“dpiX”), a supplier of amorphous silicon-based thin film transistor arrays for digital flat panel image detectors. In accordance with the dpiX Holding operating agreement, net profits or losses are allocated to the members in accordance with their ownership interests.
    The investment in dpiX Holding is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. When the Company recognizes its share of net profits or losses of dpiX Holding, profits or losses in inventory purchased from dpiX are eliminated. In fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded a loss on the equity investment in dpiX Holding of $(2.3) million, $(0.8) million and $(1.1) million, respectively. Loss on the equity investment in dpiX Holding is included in other expense, net in the consolidated statements of operations. The carrying value of the equity investment in dpiX Holding was $45.0 million and $47.3 million at October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively.
    In fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company purchased glass transistor arrays from dpiX totaling $18.5 million, $20.4 million and $23.5 million, respectively. These purchases of glass transistor arrays are included as a component of inventories on the consolidated balance sheets or cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.
    As of October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, the Company had accounts payable to dpiX totaling $2.8 million and $4.6 million, respectively.
    The Company has the right to 50% of dpiX’s total manufacturing capacity. In addition, the Company is required to pay for 50% of dpiX's fixed costs, as determined at the beginning of each calendar year. In January 2021, the fixed cost commitment was determined and approved by the dpiX board of directors to be $11.6 million for calendar year 2021. As of October 1, 2021, the Company estimated it has fixed cost commitments of $2.9 million related to this amended agreement through the remainder of calendar year 2021. The amended agreement will continue unless the ownership structure of dpiX changes (as defined in the amended agreement).
    The Company has determined that dpiX Holding is a variable interest entity because at-risk equity holders, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Majority votes are required to direct the manufacturing activities, legal operations and other activities that most significantly affect dpiX’s economic performance. The Company does not have majority voting rights and no power to unilaterally direct the activities of dpiX Holding and therefore is not the primary beneficiary of dpiX Holding. The Company’s exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with dpiX Holding is limited to the carrying value of the Company’s investment of $45.0 million and fixed cost commitments.
    In November 2018, the Company (through one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries) and CETTEEN GmbH (“CETTEEN”), formed a German limited liability company that governs the affairs and conduct of the business of VEC Imaging GmbH & Co. KG (“VEC”), a joint venture formed to develop technology for use in X-ray imaging components. In accordance with the VEC agreement, net profits or losses are allocated to the members in accordance with their ownership interest. The Company's investment in VEC is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. As of October 1, 2021, the Company has made equity contributions totaling
F-20

Table of Contents
$5.1 million. CETTEEN made contributions of certain assets including intellectual property in exchange for a 50% interest in VEC. In fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, the Company recorded a loss on the equity investment in VEC of $(1.1) million, $(1.2) million, and $(0.9) million respectively. The Company's investment in VEC was $3.0 million and $2.5 million as of October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2021, the Company made its final required equity contribution of $1.2 million to VEC. As of October 1, 2021, the Company had loans outstanding to VEC totaling $0.3 million which is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
6. RESTRUCTURING
In July 2018, the Company committed to relocate the production of amorphous silicon glass for digital detectors, from its Santa Clara facility, to the jointly owned dpiX fabrication facility in Colorado. In July 2019, the Company committed to close its Santa Clara facility and to relocate the remaining production to its other existing facilities. The Company ceased all operations at the Santa Clara facility as of October 2, 2020 and all activities related to the closure of the facility were completed by the end of December 2020. In connection with the relocation of the glass production and site closure, the Company recorded $0.0 million, $9.1 million and $18.9 million of restructuring charges during fiscal year 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
    On July 29, 2020, the Company commenced the implementation of a reduction in workforce to reduce the Company’s operating costs and address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This action resulted in the reduction of the Company’s workforce by approximately 94 employees, of which nearly all were located within the United States. This reduction was in addition to the reduction in workforce associated with the closure of the Company’s Santa Clara facility.
    Cash outflows associated with these restructuring charges are limited to employee termination expenses, facility closure and equipment sales and disposals. Below is a detail of restructuring charges incurred during the 2021, 2020 and 2019 fiscal years, which predominately relate to the Company's Medical segment:
(In millions)Location of Restructuring Charges in Consolidated Statements of Operations202120202019
Inventory write downsCost of revenues$— $1.3 $3.1 
Intangible assets impairmentImpairment of intangible assets— — 4.8 
Accelerated depreciationCost of revenues0.2 2.9 4.5 
Severance costsSelling, general and administrative0.6 5.7 6.2 
Facility closure costsSelling, general and administrative0.2 3.6 0.3 
Total restructuring charges$1.0 $13.5 $18.9 
7. OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following table summarizes the Company’s accrued liabilities and other current liabilities:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Accrued compensation and benefits$44.2 $33.0 
Product warranty8.5 8.1 
Income taxes payable8.0 5.6 
Right of return liability6.7 7.4 
Accrued interest12.5 2.6 
Other9.8 13.8 
Total accrued liabilities and other current liabilities$89.7 $70.5 

F-21

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the Company’s other long-term liabilities:
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Long-term income tax payable$1.8 $3.9 
Environmental liabilities0.6 0.8 
Defined benefit obligation liability5.9 6.5 
Long-term right of return liability20.3 19.9 
Long-term other3.2 3.8 
Total other long-term liabilities$31.8 $34.9 

    The following table summarizes the Company’s other (expense) income, net:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Loss from equity method investments$(3.4)$(2.1)$(2.3)
Change in fair value of deferred consideration— 0.9 1.0 
Impairment of investment— (2.7)— 
Realized loss on foreign currencies(0.2)(3.7)(1.9)
Other0.1 — — 
Total other expense, net$(3.5)$(7.6)$(3.2)
8. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
    Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share reflects the effects of potentially dilutive securities, which is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common shares.
    A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted income per common share is as follows:
Fiscal Year
(In millions, except per share amounts)202120202019
Net income (loss) attributable to Varex$17.4 $(57.9)$15.5 
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic39.3 38.8 38.2 
Dilutive effect of Convertible Senior Notes0.6 — — 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards and other0.4 — 0.4 
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted40.3 38.8 38.6 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Varex - basic$0.44 $(1.49)$0.41 
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Varex - diluted$0.43 $(1.49)$0.40 
Anti-dilutive share-based awards, excluded2.8 3.5 1.9 

    Potentially dilutive shares, which are based on the weighted-average shares of common stock underlying stock options, unvested stock awards, purchase rights granted under the employee stock purchase plan, warrants and convertible notes using the treasury stock method or the if-converted method, as applicable, are included when calculating diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Varex when their effect is dilutive. Since we intend to settle in cash the principal outstanding under our 4.00% Convertible Senior Notes due in 2025, we apply the treasury stock method applied using our average share price during the period when calculating their potential dilutive effect, if any. Furthermore, in connection with the offerings of our notes, we entered into
F-22


convertible note hedges and warrants (see Note 10. Borrowings). However, our convertible note hedges are not included when calculating potentially dilutive shares since their effect is always anti-dilutive. Warrants, which have a strike price above our average share price during the period, were out of the money and were not included in the tables above. Because the Company incurred a net loss for fiscal year 2020, none of the potentially dilutive common shares were included in the diluted share calculation for that period as they would have been anti-dilutive.
9. FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
    As part of the Company’s overall risk management practices, the Company enters into financial derivatives to manage its financial exposures to foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates.
    The Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. A qualitative assessment of hedge effectiveness is performed on a quarterly basis, unless facts and circumstances indicate the hedge may no longer be highly effective, in which case the Company would test for effectiveness on a more frequent basis. The changes in fair value for all trades that are not designated for hedge accounting are recognized in current period income. The Company does not offset fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments in its consolidated balance sheets for presentation purposes.
    Credit risk related to derivative transactions reflects the risk that a party to the transaction could fail to meet its obligation under the derivative contracts. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to the counterparty’s credit risk is generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparty’s obligations to the Company exceed the Company’s obligations to the counterparty. The Company’s policy is to enter into contracts only with financial institutions which meet certain minimum credit ratings to help mitigate counterparty credit risk.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Cash Flow Hedges
    The Company previously used interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges to manage its exposure to fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts effectively fix the LIBOR component of variable interest rate debt for a specific period of time.
    As of October 1, 2021, the Company had no outstanding derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments.
    The following table summarizes the amount of pre-tax income (loss) recognized from derivative instruments for the periods indicated:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
Fiscal Year Ended
Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into IncomeAmount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income
Fiscal Year Ended
(In millions)202120202019202120202019
Interest rate swap contracts$— $(3.4)$(6.3)Interest expense$— 

$(1.5)$1.9 

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Net Investment Hedges
    The Company uses cross currency swap contracts as net investment hedges to manage its risk of variability in foreign currency-denominated net investments in majority-owned international operations. All changes in fair value of the derivatives designated as net investment hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income along with the foreign currency translation adjustments on those investments. In September 2020, the Company terminated one of the net investment swaps and the loss on the swap was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income where it will remain until substantial liquidation of the international operations.
    As of October 1, 2021, the Company had the following outstanding derivatives designated as net investment hedging instruments:
F-23

Table of Contents
(In millions, except for number of instruments)Number of InstrumentsNotional Value
Cross currency swap contracts3$66.6 

    The following table summarizes the amount of pre-tax income recognized from derivative instruments for the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying statements of operations where the results are recorded for net investment hedges:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives
Fiscal Year Ended
Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
(In millions)202120202019202120202019
Cross currency swap contracts$(0.3)$(1.3)$(0.2)Interest expense$1.3 $1.5 $0.2 

    These derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements giving effect to rights of offset with each counterparty. None of the balances were eligible for netting. The following table summarizes the gross fair values of derivative instruments as of the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets where the instruments are recorded:
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
(In millions)October 1, 2021October 2, 2020October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
Derivatives designated as net investment hedgesBalance sheet locationBalance sheet location
Cross currency swap contractsOther current assets$1.2 $1.3 Other current liabilities$— $— 
Cross currency swap contractsOther non-current assets— — Other non-current liabilities(2.4)(2.1)
$1.2 $1.3 $(2.4)$(2.1)

F-24

Table of Contents
10. BORROWINGS
    The following table summarizes the Company's short-term and long-term debt:
October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
(In millions, except for percentages)AmountWeighted-Avg Effective Interest RateAmountWeighted-Avg Effective Interest Rate$ Change
Current maturities of long-term debt
Other debt$2.8 $2.5 $0.3 
Total current maturities of long-term debt$2.8 $2.5 $0.3 
Non-current maturities of long-term debt:
Asset-Based Loan$— $— $— 
Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes200.0 10.9%200.0 10.9%— 
Senior Secured Notes270.0 8.2%300.0 8.2%(30.0)
Other debt7.8 8.8 (1.0)
Total non-current maturities of long-term debt:$477.8 $508.8 $(31.0)
Unamortized issuance costs and debt discounts
Unamortized discount - Convertible Notes$(37.6)$(45.4)$7.8 
Unamortized issuance costs - Convertible Notes(4.1)(5.0)0.9 
Debt issuance costs - Senior Secured Notes(4.4)(5.6)1.2 
Total$(46.1)$(56.0)$9.9 
Total debt outstanding, net$434.5 $455.3 $(20.8)

    Future principal payments of long-term debt outstanding as of October 1, 2021 are as follows:
(In millions)
Fiscal years:
2022$2.8 
20232.6 
20241.7 
2025201.7 
20261.4 
Thereafter270.4 
Total debt outstanding$480.6 
Less: current maturities of long-term debt(2.8)
Non-current portion of long -term debt$477.8 

F-25

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the Company's interest expense:

Twelve Months Ended
October 1, 2021October 2, 2020September 27, 2019
Contractual interest coupon and other$30.7 $19.1 $17.9 
Amortization/extinguishment of debt issuance costs3.5 7.0 3.2 
Amortization of debt discounts7.9 5.3 — 
Total interest expense$42.1 $31.4 $21.1 

Convertible Senior Unsecured Notes
    On June 9, 2020, Varex issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.00% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2025 (“Convertible Notes”). The net proceeds from the issuance of the Convertible Notes, after deducting transaction fees and offering expense payable by the Company, were approximately $193.1 million. The Convertible Notes bear interest at the annual rate of 4.00%, payable semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning on December 1, 2020, and will mature on June 1, 2025, unless earlier converted or repurchased by us.

Call Spread
    On June 4, 2020 and June 5, 2020, in connection with the offering of the Convertible Notes, Varex entered into privately negotiated convertible note hedge transactions (collectively, the “Hedge Transactions”). The Hedge Transactions cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the number of shares of Varex common stock that initially underlie the Convertible Notes. The Hedge Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution and/or offset any cash payments Varex is required to make in excess of the principal amount due upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in the event that the market price of Varex common stock is greater than the strike price of the Hedge Transactions, which was initially $20.81 per share (subject to adjustment under the terms of the Hedge Transactions). The strike price of $20.81 corresponds to the initial conversion price of the Convertible Notes. The number of shares underlying the Hedge Transactions is 9.6 million.
    On June 4, 2020 and June 5, 2020, Varex also entered into privately negotiated warrant transactions (collectively, the “Warrant Transactions” and, together with the Hedge Transactions, the “Call Spread Transactions”), whereby the Company sold warrants at a higher strike price relating to the same number of shares of Varex common stock that initially underlie the Convertible Notes, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments. The initial strike price of the warrants is $24.975 per share (subject to adjustment under the terms of the Warrant Transactions), which is 50% above the last reported sale price of Varex common stock on June 4, 2020. The Warrant Transactions could have a dilutive effect to the Company's stockholders to the extent that the market price per share of Varex common stock, as measured under the terms of the Warrant Transactions, exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. The number of shares underlying the Warrant Transactions is 9.6 million. The number of warrants outstanding as of October 1, 2021, was 9.6 million.

Senior Secured Notes
    Varex issued $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2027 (the "Senior Secured Notes") pursuant to an indenture dated September 30, 2020, among Varex, certain of its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries as guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as trustee and collateral agent. Interest payments are paid semiannually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2021.
    The Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of Varex and the assets and capital stock of its subsidiary guarantors (subject to exceptions), except for assets for which a first priority security interest is pledged for the ABL Facility (defined below), in which the Senior Secured Notes will have a second lien security interest. The Senior Secured Notes include negative covenants, subject to certain exceptions, restricting or limiting Varex's ability and the ability of its restricted subsidiaries to, among other things, incur liens on collateral; sell certain assets; incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends; issue preferred shares; consolidate, merge, or sell all or substantially all of its assets; and enter into certain transactions with their affiliates.
    On July 15, 2021, the Company redeemed $30 million of Senior Secured Notes, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the governing indenture, by paying cash of $31.5 million, inclusive of the redemption premium and accrued interest, and recognized a $1.4 million loss related to the redemption premium and the write-off of previously recorded debt issuance costs. The redemption price of the redeemed notes was 103% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest from, and including, April 15, 2021 to, but excluding, the redemption date of July 15, 2021.
Asset-Based Loan
F-26

Table of Contents
    Concurrent with the termination of the Credit Agreement provided notice(defined below) and closing of the Senior Secured Notes on September 30, 2020, the Company entered into a revolving credit agreement consisting of a $100.0 million asset-based loan revolving credit facility (the “Asset-Based Loan”, or "ABL Facility"). Borrowings under the Asset-Based Loan will be expected to bear interest at floating rates based on LIBOR, or comparable rate, or a base rate, and an applicable margin based on Average Daily Excess Availability (as defined in the Asset-Based Loan Agreement). In addition, the Company is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee of 0.375% to 0.5%, based on the aggregate unused commitments under the Asset-Based Loan. The ABL Facility matures on the earlier of September 30, 2025 or 91 days prior to the administrative agentmaturity of the Convertible Notes, at which time all outstanding amounts under the ABL Facility will be due and payable. The maximum availability under our ABL Facility is $100.0 million; however, the borrowing base under the ABL fluctuates from month-to-month depending on the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and real estate. As of October 1, 2021, the amount available under our ABL Facility was $69.4 million and the ABL Facility remains undrawn.
    The ABL Facility includes various restrictive covenants that effectivelimit our ability to engage in certain transactions, including the incurrence of debt, payment of dividends and other restrictive payments, existence of restrictions affecting subsidiaries, sales of stock and assets, certain affiliate transactions, modifications of debt documents and organizational documents, changes to line of business and fiscal year, incurrence of liens, making fundamental changes, prepayments of junior indebtedness, and certain other transactions.
    The ABL Facility contains a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 that is tested when excess availability under the ABL is less than the greater of (i) 10.0% of the Loan Cap (the lesser of (a) the aggregate commitments under the ABL Facility and (b) the aggregate borrowing base) and (ii) $7.5 million. As of October 1, 2021, the Company is compliant with the ABL Facility covenants.
    The ABL Facility will have a first lien security interest on accounts receivable, cash, and inventory as well as certain real estate and holds second lien security interest on all other assets.

Credit Agreement
    On May 1, 2017 Varex entered into a secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) in an aggregate principal amount of up to $200.0 million with a term of five years, and a secured term facility (the “Term Facility” and together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the “Credit Agreement”) in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million, which was subsequently amended.
    On September 30, 2020, the Company terminated its previously existing Credit Agreement, consisting of both the Term Facility and Revolving Credit Facility. The Company repaid the outstanding Term Facility balance of $265.5 million and accrued interest of $2.0 million with proceeds received from the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes (defined above) and wrote off approximately $3.8 million of previously recorded debt issuance costs, which resulted in a $3.8 million loss on extinguishment of debt, recorded as interest expense within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
11. FAIR VALUE
Assets/Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
    The fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments, including bank deposits included in cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, also approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. As of October 1, 2021, the fair value of the Company's Convertible Notes and Senior Secured Notes, as defined in Note 10. Borrowings andmeasured using Level 1 inputs, were $296.3 million and $304.8 million, respectively. As of October 2, 2020, the fair values of the Company's Convertible Notes and Senior Secured Notes, measured using Level 1 inputs, were $178.5 million and $312.8 million, respectively. The Company has elected to use the income approach to value its derivative instruments using standard valuation techniques and Level 2 inputs, such as currency spot rates, forward points and credit default swap spreads. There were no financial assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and there were no transfers in or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 during fiscal year 2021.
    In the tables below, the Company has segregated all assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
F-27

Table of Contents
(In millions)Fair Value Measurements at October 1, 2021
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents - money market funds$— $88.2 $— $88.2 
Derivative assets— 1.2 — 1.2 
Total assets measured at fair value$— $89.4 $— $89.4 
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities$— $2.4 $— $2.4 
Total liabilities measured at fair value$— $2.4 $— $2.4 

    At October 2, 2020, the Company determined the following levels of inputs for the following assets or liabilities:
(In millions)Fair Value Measurements at October 2, 2020
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents - Money market funds$— $72.9 $— $72.9 
Derivative assets— 1.1 — 1.1 
Total assets measured at fair value$— $74.0 $— $74.0 
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities$— $2.1 $— $2.1 
Deferred consideration— — — — 
Total liabilities measured at fair value$— $2.1 $— $2.1 
12. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
    The following table reflects goodwill by reportable segment:
(In millions)MedicalIndustrialTotal
Balance at October 2, 2020$174.4 $118.7 $293.1 
Other(0.2)(0.2)(0.4)
Foreign currency translation adjustments(0.3)(0.2)(0.5)
Balance at October 1, 2021$173.9 $118.3 $292.2 

    The following table reflects the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s finite-lived intangible assets included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets:
October 1, 2021October 2, 2020
(In millions)Gross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying AmountGross Carrying AmountAccumulated AmortizationNet Carrying Amount
Acquired existing technology$74.2 $(45.5)$28.7 $74.9 $(37.5)$37.4 
Patents, licenses and other12.8 (10.9)1.9 12.8 (9.7)3.1 
Customer contracts and supplier relationship51.1 (31.0)20.1 51.2 (24.2)27.0 
Total intangible assets$138.1 $(87.4)$50.7 $138.9 $(71.4)$67.5 
F-28

Table of Contents

    Amortization expense for intangible assets was $16.8 million, $17.2 million and $15.7 million in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company recognized intangible asset impairment charges of $0.0 million, $2.8 million, and $4.8 million in fiscal years 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, which are included in the consolidated statements of operations under impairment of intangible assets. These impairment charges related primarily to the Company's Medical reporting segment.
As of October 1, 2021, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets with finite lives is as follows:
(In millions)
Fiscal years:
2022$14.7 
202313.6 
20249.2 
20253.0 
20263.0 
Thereafter7.2 
Total$50.7 
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
    See Note 3. Leases, included in this report, for additional information about the Company's lease commitments.
Purchase Agreement With Supplier
    During the third quarter of fiscal year 2020, Varex entered into a purchase agreement with a supplier to acquire certain equipment and intellectual property from the supplier that is utilized to manufacture X-ray cables utilized in Varex's products. As of October 1, 2021, there has been no transfer of control of the underlying equipment. This acquisition is expected to be completed during the 2023 fiscal year and the total consideration to be paid by Varex for the acquired assets is expected to be ¥1,084.7 million or approximately $9.8 million.
Other Commitments
    See Note 5. Related Party Transactions, included in this report, for additional information about the Company’s commitments to dpiX.
    See Note 14. Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests & Noncontrolling Interests, included in this report, for additional information about the Company’s commitment to the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis.
    The Company has an environmental liability of approximately $0.8 million as of October 8,1, 2021.
Contingencies
    From time to time, the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations, customs and duty audits, other contingency matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. The Company accrues amounts for probable losses, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are adequate to address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value). A loss or a range of loss is disclosed when it is reasonably possible that a material loss will be incurred and can be estimated or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss, when material, will exceed the recorded provision. The Company did not have any material contingent liabilities as of October 1, 2021and October 2, 2020. Legal expenses are expensed as incurred.
F-29

Table of Contents
14. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
    In April 2019, a subsidiary of Varex acquired 98.2% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion. In April 2021, the Company acquired all of the remaining shares representing the noncontrolling interests in Direct Conversion such that the Company now owns 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Direct Conversion. As a result, the Company consolidates Direct Conversion's operations in its consolidated financial statements and no longer records any noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Company's consolidated balance sheet related to Direct Conversion
    In September 2018, the Company entered into a partnership in Saudi Arabia. The Company has majority voting rights with an approximate 75% interest. Accordingly, the Company has consolidated the operations of the Saudi Arabia partnership in the Company's consolidated financial statements and recorded the noncontrolling interests. The noncontrolling interest related to the partner’s 25% interest in the joint venture is included in noncontrolling interest in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Income representing the noncontrolling partner's share of income from operations is included in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.
    In April 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of 73.5% of the then outstanding shares of MeVis Medical Solutions AG (“MeVis”), a public company based in Bremen, Germany that provides image processing software and services for cancer screening. In August 2015, the Company, through one of its German subsidiaries, entered into a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (the “DPLTA”) with MeVis. In October 2015, the DPLTA became effective upon its registration at the local court of Bremen, Germany. Under the DPLTA, MeVis subordinates its management to the Company and undertakes to transfer all of its annual profits and losses to the Company. In return, the DPLTA grants the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis: (1) an annual recurring net compensation of €0.95 per MeVis share starting from January 1, 2015 and (2) a put right for their MeVis shares at €19.77 per MeVis share. During fiscal year 2018, an immaterial number of MeVis’ shares were purchased under the put right. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2020, the put right granted to the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis under the DPLTA expired unexercised, which resulted in the redeemable noncontrolling interests being reclassified to permanent equity as noncontrolling interest in the consolidated balance sheet. As of October 1, 2021, noncontrolling shareholders together held approximately 0.5 million shares of MeVis, representing 26.3% of the outstanding shares.
    Changes in noncontrolling interests and redeemable noncontrolling interests were as follows:
Fiscal Years
20212020
(In millions)Noncontrolling
Interests
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
Noncontrolling Interest
Balance at beginning of period$14.1 $10.5 $3.3 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests0.5 0.5 — 
Reclassification of redeemable NCI in MeVis to noncontrolling interests in permanent equity— (11.3)11.3 
Other, including foreign currency remeasurement(1.4)0.3 (0.5)
Balance at end of period$13.2 $— $14.1 
15. EMPLOYEE STOCK PLANS
Employee Stock Plans
    The Company's employees participate in Varex Imaging Corporation 2020 Omnibus Stock Plan (the “2020 Stock Plan”), 2017 Omnibus Stock Plan (the “2017 Stock Plan”), and Varex Imaging Corporation 2017 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2017 ESPP”) which allows the grants of stock options, restricted stock units and performance shares among other types of awards.
    In January 2017, Varex stockholders approved the 2017 ESPP, which provides eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of Varex common stock at 85% of the lower of its fair market value at the start and end of a six-month purchase period. The 2017 ESPP provides for the purchase of up to 1000000 shares of Varex common stock.
F-30

Table of Contents
Share-Based Compensation Expense
    Share-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation expense includes expenses related to the Company’s direct employees.
    The table below summarizes the effect of recording share-based compensation expense and for the option component of the employee stock purchase plan shares:
Fiscal Year
(In millions)202120202019
Cost of revenues$1.4 $1.1 $1.2 
Research and development3.0 2.5 2.2 
Selling, general and administrative9.5 9.8 8.3 
Total share-based compensation expense$13.9 $13.4 $11.7 

    The unrecognized share-based compensation cost as of October 1, 2021 was $22.9 million, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.7 fiscal years. As of October 1, 2021, there were approximately 4.1 million and 0.3 million shares of common stock available for future issuances under the 2020 Stock Plan and the 2017 ESPP, respectively.
    The Company utilized the Black-Scholes valuation model for estimating the fair value of stock options granted and the option component of ESPP grants. The Company calculated the fair value of option grants and option component of ESPP grants on the respective dates of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:
Employee Stock Option PlanEmployee Stock Purchase Plans
Fiscal YearFiscal Year
202120202019202120202019
Expected term (in years)7.06.14.60.50.50.5
Risk-free interest rate1.0 %1.1 %2.5 %0.1 %0.9 %2.5 %
Expected volatility41.5 %36.9 %33.9 %68.4 %50.0 %43.9 %
Expected dividend— %— %— %— %— %— %
Weighted average fair value at grant date$9.37$7.53$10.19$5.90$7.94$7.81

    Option valuation methods, including Black-Scholes, require the input of subjective assumptions, which are discussed below.
Risk-Free Interest Rate
    The interest rates used are based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award.
Expected Term
    Options granted generally vest over a period of 36 to 48 months and expire 7 to 10 years from date of grant. Employee stock purchase plan offering periods are 6 months and provides eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of Varex common stock at 85% of the lower of its fair market value at the start or end of a six-month purchase period. The Company has elected to use the simplified method in calculating the expected term of its options due to a lack of sufficient historical information.
Expected Dividend Yield
    The dividend rate used is zero as the Company has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The Company is also restricted from paying dividends on common stock under its debt facilities.
F-31

Table of Contents
Expected Volatility
    Authoritative accounting guidance on stock-based compensation indicates that companies should consider volatility over a period generally commensurate with the expected or contractual term of the stock option. Adequate Company-specific data does not exist for this time period as the Company began trading in January 2017. The volatility variable used is a blended approach by using the Company's historic data for the years it has been publicly traded and a benchmark of other comparable companies’ volatility rates for the prior years.
Stock Option Activity
    The following table summarizes the activity for stock options under Varex’s employee incentive plans for the Company’s employees:
(In thousands, except per share amounts and the remaining term)OptionsPrice rangeWeighted Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Term (in years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
Outstanding at October 2, 20202,735 $13.61 - $37.60$29.23 4.5$— 
Granted399 $25.06 - $27.9525.19 
Canceled, expired or forfeited(323)$25.17 - $37.1028.90 
Outstanding at October 1, 20212,811 $13.61 - $37.60$28.69 4.7$5,161.0 
Exercisable at October 1, 20211,911 $13.61 - $37.60$30.36 3.1$1,597.6 
(1) The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value, which is computed based on the difference between the exercise price and the closing price of Varex common stock of $28.58 as of October 1, 2021, the last trading date of the Company's respective fiscal years, and which represents the amount that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options and sold the shares received upon exercise as of that date.

    The grant-date fair value of options granted during fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $3.7 million, $4.4 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during the years ended October 1, 2021, October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 was $0.0 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively
Restricted Stock Units, Restricted Stock Awards and Deferred Stock Units
    The following table summarizes the activity for restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and deferred stock units under Varex’s employee incentive plans for the Company’s employees:
(In thousands, except per share amounts)Number of SharesWeighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value
Balance at October 2, 2020955 $25.54 
Granted388 22.81 
Vested(199)33.63 
Canceled, expired or forfeited(64)23.39 
Balance at October 1, 20211,080 $23.25 

    The total grant-date fair value of shares granted was $8.9 million, $11.9 million and $9.0 million for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Shares outstanding at October 1, 2021, October 2, 2020 and September 27, 2019 had an estimated market value of $30.9 million, $11.8 million and $19.2 million, respectively.
16. TAXES ON INCOME
    Income tax expense or benefit is based on reported income or loss before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences between asset and liability amounts that are recognized for financial reporting purposes and the
F-32

Table of Contents
amounts that are recognized for income tax purposes. These deferred taxes are measured by applying currently enacted tax laws. Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
    Income tax expense (benefit) was as follows:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Current income tax expense (benefit)
Federal$5.4 $(16.3)$9.2 
State and local1.4 (1.4)1.3 
Foreign6.8 5.7 6.8 
Total current$13.6 $(12.0)$17.3 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Federal$1.8 $(1.7)$(10.0)
State and local(1.3)0.6 (1.6)
Foreign(3.4)(2.1)— 
Total deferred$(2.9)$(3.2)$(11.6)
Income tax expense (benefit)$10.7 $(15.2)$5.7 

Income (loss) before taxes are generated from the following geographic areas:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
United States$(4.1)$(74.1)$5.9 
Foreign32.7 1.5 15.6 
Income (loss) before taxes$28.6 $(72.6)$21.5 

The effective tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate as a result of the following:
Fiscal Years
2021
2020 (1)
2019 (1)
Federal statutory income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State and local taxes, net of federal tax benefit0.3 1.0 (0.9)
Mandatory repatriation tax on foreign earnings— — 1.9 
Return to provision4.2 2.8 (4.7)
Research and development credit(4.2)3.7 (10.2)
Prior year research and development credit(0.3)— — 
Prior year deferred tax adjustments— 0.4 4.7 
Foreign rate difference1.7 (0.4)6.0 
Foreign research innovation box(3.8)— — 
Change in valuation allowance8.4 (11.0)11.2 
U.S. tax reform - international provisions(0.7)— (4.7)
U.S. net operating loss carryback5.2 5.6 — 
Other5.6 (2.2)2.2 
Effective tax rate37.4 %20.9 %26.5 %
(1)Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

F-33

Table of Contents
During fiscal year 2021, the Company's effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily because of the unfavorable impact of U.S. deferred tax attributes and losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which a valuation allowance is provided and a reduction in benefit for U.S. net operating losses carried back to prior years. These unfavorable items are partially offset by the favorable impact of R&D tax credits and U.S. tax reform international provisions.
    During fiscal year 2020, the Company’s effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily because of the favorable impact of U.S. net operating losses to be carried back to tax years with greater U.S. federal statutory rates. These favorable tax items were mostly offset by the unfavorable impact of additional losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, limitations on interest expense, and R&D credits for which no benefit is recognized.
    During fiscal year 2019, the Company’s effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% primarily because of the favorable impact of changes to the U.S. corporate tax structure resulting from U.S. Tax Reform, and U.S. research and development tax credits. These favorable U.S. tax items were offset by losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no benefit is recognized and earnings in other foreign jurisdictions that are taxed at higher rates.
    The Company was permanently reducing the revolving credit commitment under the Credit Agreement by $25.0 million to $125.0 million. The reductionhas estimated its fiscal year 2021 GILTI (global intangible low-taxed income), BEAT (base-erosion anti-abuse tax), FDII (foreign-derived intangible income), limitations on interest expense deductions, and other components of U.S. Tax Reform, and have included these amounts in the revolving credit commitment will also reducecalculation of the fees paidfiscal year 2021 tax provision. The Company has made an accounting policy election, as allowed by the Company in connection with such commitment.SEC and FASB, to recognize the impact of GILTI as a period cost if and when incurred.

    Significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

(In millions)October 1, 2021
October 2, 2020 (1)
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory adjustments$4.9 $4.4 
Share-based compensation5.5 4.2 
Product warranty1.8 1.7 
Deferred compensation1.6 1.3 
Net operating loss carryforwards25.7 27.0 
Accrued vacation1.0 1.0 
Accrued incentives4.2 1.7 
Credit carryforwards3.3 5.9 
Deferred financing fees3.0 3.3 
Interest expense limitation4.3 4.7 
Lease liabilities6.8 7.2 
Other6.4 4.3 
$68.5 $66.7 
Valuation allowance(30.2)(28.7)
Total deferred tax assets$38.3 $38.0 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Acquired intangibles$(13.9)$(16.6)
Property, plant and equipment(13.0)(12.4)
Investments in privately held companies(1.8)(2.8)
Operating lease assets(6.5)(6.7)
Other(1.3)(1.3)
Total deferred tax liabilities(36.5)(39.8)
Net deferred tax assets$1.8 $(1.8)
Reported As:
Deferred tax assets$38.3 $38.0 
Deferred tax liabilities(36.5)(39.8)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)$1.8 $(1.8)
(1)Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
F-41
F-34

Table of Contents

    The Company is maintaining its reinvestment assertion with respect to foreign earnings for the year ended October 1, 2021, which is that all earnings prior to fiscal year 2018 are permanently reinvested for all countries, and that all earnings for Direct Conversion, located primarily in Sweden and Finland, are also indefinitely reinvested in those countries, but post fiscal year 2017 earnings in all other countries are not permanently reinvested. Due to the level of earnings available for repatriation, the treaty benefits applicable to jurisdictions in which those earnings are located, and the now favorable U.S. tax treatment of repatriated foreign earnings, the amount of deferred tax liability recorded related to the potential repatriation is approximately $0.1 million. This estimated liability is for U.S. state income taxes and foreign withholding taxes that would apply if the foreign earnings were repatriated in the form of a dividend.
    As of October 1, 2021, the Company had foreign net operating loss carryforwards ("NOL") of approximately $25.7 million with $2.6 million expiring between 2021 and 2030 and $23.1 million carried forward indefinitely. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act, among other things, permits NOL carryovers and carrybacks to offset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. On July 2, 2020, the US Treasury Department issued a regulation providing an election to waive NOL carryback to a former consolidated group. During fiscal year 2021, the Company filed NOL carryback claims for U.S. losses incurred during fiscal year 2020 and anticipates cash tax refunds on those claims.
    The valuation allowance relates primarily to net operating losses in certain foreign jurisdictions, limitations on interest expense deductions, and other deferred tax attributes where, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will not be realized. The valuation allowance increased by $1.5 million during fiscal year 2021 and increased by $9.9 million during fiscal year 2020. The increase during the current year was primarily related to other U.S. deferred tax attributes.
    Changes in the Company's valuation allowance for deferred tax assets were as follows:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)202120202019
Valuation allowance balance–beginning of fiscal year$28.7 $18.8 $4.0 
Increases resulting from business combinations— — 12.0 
Other increases5.4 10.2 2.8 
Other decreases(3.9)(0.3)— 
Valuation allowance balance—end of fiscal year$30.2 $28.7 $18.8 

    The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes following a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining whether the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that, based on the technical merits, the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement.
    Changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits were as follows:
Fiscal Years
(In millions)20212020
Unrecognized tax benefits balance–beginning of fiscal year$0.8 $0.6 
Additions based on tax positions related to a prior year0.4 0.2 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year0.1 — 
Reductions resulting from the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations(0.2)— 
Unrecognized tax benefits balance—end of fiscal year$1.1 $0.8 

    As of October 1, 2021 and October 2, 2020, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was $1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively, all of which would affect the effective tax rate if recognized.
F-35

Table of Contents
    The Company includes interest and penalties related to income taxes within income tax expense (benefit) on the consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended October 1, 2021, $0.2 million interest and penalties have been included for this period. For the year ended October 2, 2020, $0.1 million interest and penalties have been included for this period. For the year ended September 27, 2019, $0.1 million interest and penalties have been included for this period.
    The Company files U.S. federal and state income tax returns and non-U.S. income tax returns in various jurisdictions. All of these returns are subject to examination by their respective taxing jurisdictions from the date of filing through each applicable statute of limitation period. Other periods for entities acquired are still open and subject to examination. Generally, periods prior to 2011 are no longer subject to examination.
    During fiscal year 2021, the New York Department of Finance and Taxation and the Utah State Tax Commission commenced examinations of Varex’s tax returns for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The Swedish Tax Agency will commence an examination of Direct Conversion’s tax returns for the fiscal year 2019 in fiscal year 2022. Although the outcome of tax audits are uncertain, based on currently available information, the Company believes the outcomes will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
17. SEGMENT INFORMATION
    The Company has 2 reportable operating segments: Medical and Industrial, which aligns with how its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), who is the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), reviews the Company’s performance. The segments align the Company’s products and service offerings with customer use in medical and industrial markets and are consistent with how the Company’s CEO, who is also its CODM, evaluates the business for the allocation of resources. The CODM allocates resources to and evaluates the financial performance of each operating segment primarily based on revenues and gross profit. The operating and reportable segment structure provides alignment between business strategies and operating results.
Description of Segments
    The Medical segment designs, manufactures, sells and services X-ray imaging components, including X-ray tubes, digital detectors, high voltage connectors, image-processing software and workstations, 3D reconstruction software, computer-aided diagnostic software, collimators, automatic exposure control devices, generators, heat exchangers, ionization chambers and buckys (a component of X-ray units that holds X-ray film cassettes). These components are used in a range of medical imaging applications including CT, mammography, oncology, cardiac, surgery, dental, and other diagnostic radiography uses.
    The Industrial segment designs, develops, manufactures, sells and services X-ray imaging products for use in a number of markets, including security applications for cargo screening at ports and borders and baggage screening at airports, and nondestructive testing and inspection applications used in a number of other markets. The Company's Industrial products include Linatron® X-ray linear accelerators, X-ray tubes, digital detectors and high voltage connectors. In addition, the Company licenses proprietary image-processing and detection software designed to work with other Varex products to provide packaged sub-assembly solutions to Industrial customers.
    Accordingly, the following information is provided for purposes of achieving an understanding of operations, but it may not be indicative of the financial results of the reported segments were they independent organizations. In addition, comparisons of the Company’s operations to similar operations of other companies may not be meaningful.
F-36

Table of Contents
    Information related to the Company’s segments is as follows:
Fiscal Year
(In millions)202120202019
Revenues
Medical$643.8 $584.5 $596.8 
Industrial174.3 153.8 183.8 
Total revenues818.1 738.3 780.6 
Gross profit
Medical203.2 136.4 188.9 
Industrial68.3 53.8 67.8 
Total gross profit271.5 190.2 256.7 
Total operating expenses197.4 223.9 211.0 
Interest and other expense, net(45.5)(38.9)(24.2)
Income (loss) before taxes28.6 (72.6)21.5 
Income tax expense (benefit)10.7 (15.2)5.7 
Net income (loss)17.9 (57.4)15.8 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests0.5 0.5 0.3 
Net income (loss) attributable to Varex$17.4 $(57.9)$15.5 

    The Company does not disclose total assets by segment as this information is not provided to the CODM.

Geographic Information
RevenuesLong-Lived Assets
Fiscal YearsFiscal Years
(In millions)20212020201920212020
Americas$268.5 $255.0 $282.6 $105.4 $115.9 
EMEA276.3 231.5 269.0 23.9 21.5 
APAC273.3 251.8 229.0 10.9 7.8 
Total company$818.1 $738.3 $780.6 $140.2 $145.2 

    Revenue in the United States of America was $262.3 million, $249.8 million and $275.3 million in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
    The Company operates various manufacturing and marketing operations outside the United States. Americas includes North and South America. EMEA includes Europe, Russia, the Middle East, India and Africa. APAC includes Asia and Australia. Revenues by region are based on the known final destination of products sold.
18. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
    Varex’s 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code and intended for all full-time employees in the United States. This plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their pretax salary up to the maximum dollar limitation prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company made matching contributions to the plan totaling $2.8 million, $4.4 million and $6.7 million in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
    The Company also maintains defined benefit plans for employees located outside the US. The net pension liability is included in other long-term liabilities on the Company's consolidated balance sheets and totaled $5.9 million and $6.5 million as of October 1,
F-37


2021 and October 2, 2020, respectively. The Company’s net periodic benefit costs for the Company’s defined benefit plans were not material for fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019.
19. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
    The following tables present the changes in the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss):
(In millions)Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial InstrumentsUnrealized Gain (Loss) on Defined Benefit ObligationsCurrency Translation AdjustmentAccumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Balance at September 27, 2019$(0.4)$(1.3)$— $(1.7)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications(3.4)0.9 (1.3)(3.8)
Amount reclassified out of other comprehensive income1.5 — — 1.5 
Amount reclassified out of other comprehensive income - transaction remote2.4 — — 2.4 
Income tax impact(0.1)(0.3)0.3 (0.1)
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — 2.5 2.5 
Balance at October 2, 2020$— $(0.7)$1.5 $0.8 
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications— (0.1)(0.3)(0.4)
Income tax impact— — 0.1 0.1 
Foreign currency translation adjustment— — (0.5)(0.5)
Balance at October 1, 2021$— $(0.8)$0.8 $— 
F-38