☒ ~~Annual Report under Section~~ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 orOR 15 ~~(d) of Securities Exchange Act of~~(D) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐ ~~Transition Report under Section~~TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 orOR 15 ~~(d) of Securities Exchange Act of~~(D) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive oﬃcers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant~~registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting ~~and non-voting~~ common stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2022 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $137,323,148 based upon the closing price of the shares on the NASDAQ Capital Market on that date. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purpose.

The number of registrant's shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, issuable and outstanding as of ~~March 23, 2023~~April 25, 2024, was ~~10,229,060~~14,526,654.

Beam Global (the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”) to the ~~registrant’s~~Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed by the Company on April 16, 2024 (the “Original Filing”), solely to amend and restate Part III, Item 10 through Item 14, and to update Item 15. The Part III information was previously omitted from the Original Filing in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, which permits the information in the above referenced items to be incorporated in the Form 10-K by reference from our definitive proxy statement ~~for the registrant’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders which will be~~if such statement is filed ~~with the Commission~~ no later than 120 days after ~~the registrant’s~~our fiscal ~~year ended December 31, 2022, are~~year-end. The information required by Items 10-14 of Part III is no longer being incorporated by reference to the proxy statement relating to our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The reference on the cover of the Original Filing to the incorporation by reference to portions of our definitive proxy statement into Part III of the Original Filing is hereby deleted. This Amendment No. 1 is not intended to update any other information presented in the Original Filing. In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, new certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed herewith as exhibits to this ~~report.~~Amendment No.1. Because no financial statements have been included in this Amendment No. 1 and this Amendment No. 1 does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of the certifications have been omitted.

Unless specifically noted otherwise, this annual report on Form 10-K reflects the business and operations of Beam Global, a Nevada corporation (hereinafter the “Company,” “us,” “we,” “our” or “Beam”).

This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about us, the industry in which we operate and other matters, as well as management's beliefs and assumptions and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. These statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies and prospects. For example, when we use words such as “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “will,” “opportunity,” “potential” or “may,” and variations of such words or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act).

These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by the Company in those statements. The most important factors that could prevent the Company from achieving its stated goals include, but are not limited to, the following:

~~We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this annual report on Form 10-K.~~

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in the section titled "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K. We cannot assure you that the results, events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results, events or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this annual report on Form 10-K relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.

Beam is a clean-technology innovation company based in San Diego, California. We develop, manufacture and sell high-quality, renewably energized infrastructure products for electric vehicle charging infrastructure, energy storage, energy security, disaster preparedness and outdoor media advertising. Our Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure products are powered by locally generated renewable energy and enable vital and highly valuable services in locations where it is either too expensive, too disruptive or impossible to connect to a utility grid, or where the requirements for electrical power are so important that grid failures, like blackouts, are intolerable. We do not compete with EV charging companies; rather, we enable such companies by providing infrastructure solutions that replace the time consuming and expensive process of construction and electrical work which are usually required to install traditional grid-tied EV chargers. We also do not compete with utilities. Our products provide utilities with another tool to deliver reliable and low-cost electricity to EV chargers and, in the case of a grid failure, to first responders and others, through our integrated emergency power panels. We also provide energy storage technologies that make commodity battery cells safer, longer lasting and more energy efficient and our battery management systems (BMS) and associated packaging make batteries safe and usable in a variety of mobility, energy-security and stationary applications.

Our charging products are rapidly deployed without the need for construction or electrical work. We compete with the highly fragmented and disintegrated ecosystem of general contractors, electrical contractors, consultants, engineers, permitting specialists and others who are required to perform a traditional grid-tied EV charger installation construction and electrical project. Our clean-technology products are designed to replace a complicated, expensive, time consuming and risk prone process with an easy, low total cost of ownership, robust and reliable product.

Beam’s renewable energy infrastructure products and proprietary technology solutions target four markets that are experiencing significant growth with annual global spending in the billions of dollars.

The Company focuses on creating high-quality renewable energy products that are rapidly deployable, have diverse use cases and are attractively designed. We believe that there is a clear need for rapidly deployable and highly scalable EV charging infrastructure, and that our EV ARC™ and Solar Tree™ products fulfill that requirement. We are agnostic as to the EV charging service equipment as we do not sell EV charging, rather we sell products which enable it. Our EV ARC™ and Solar Tree™ products replace the infrastructure required to support EV chargers, not the chargers themselves. Our ability to make commodity battery cells safer, longer lived and more energy efficient is, we believe, a significant differentiator as we move to an increasingly electrified and untethered world.

All of our infrastructure products currently incorporate the same underlying technology with a built-in renewable energy source in the form of attached solar panels and/or a light wind generator, along with battery storage which enables our products to generate and store all of their own electricity while operating without connecting to the utility grid. Our products are also able to connect to the grid if a customer values that capability. We believe that the U.S. and global utility grids lack sufficient capacity to supply enough electricity to all the new EVs and other electrical devices which are becoming increasingly available to consumers, especially considering the number of national and state governments that have announced future bans on the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles, as early as 2025 in Norway, and 2030 in Germany, with most bans being put in place no later than 2040. Even locations with a grid connection often lack circuits which have enough capacity to support EV charging in any meaningful way. For example, parking lots might have enough electrical capacity to power lighting but not enough to power EV charging. Beam products provide that power without a requirement to increase the electrical grid capacity at a site which can often be, and we believe will increasingly be, expensive, disruptive, complex and time consuming.

We believe that there will be an increasing demand and need for rapidly deployed and highly scalable EV charging infrastructure products which do not require construction or electrical work, and which do not rely on the utility grid for a supply of electricity. We are not aware of any other products which provide a similar solution for this need as effectively as our patented products which are listed below:

The global lithium-ion battery market size is projected to grow from USD 41.1 billion in 2021 to USD 116.6 billion by 2030; and it is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.3% from 2021 to 2030 according to MarketsandMarkets Analysis. We are living in an increasingly electrified world and more of the devices we rely on are no longer connected to a wall socket or any kind of utility connection. This untethering requires energy storage to be more energy dense and packaged in increasingly smaller and lighter formats. Physics dictates that the storage and release of electrical energy will create heat. In extreme cases this can lead to a chain reaction within a group of battery cells that can be difficult to stop, known as “thermal runaway”, which has led to some well publicized fires. Our energy storage products create high performance energy storage solutions used in EV charging, electric vehicles, micro mobility, aviation, medical devices, robotics, stationary storage and maritime applications. We believe that we are unique in the EV charging industry in that we use our own proprietary energy storage solutions in our EV ARC™ units. Our proprietary and patented passive thermal management, modular platform architecture, and scalable battery management systems (BMS), enhance safety and performance to prevent thermal events, while extending battery life and reducing lifetime stored energy costs. We provide safe, scalable and high-powered energy storage solutions which have enabled electrified applications in many formats for Fortune 100 companies in the U.S and Internationally.

Power outages cost the United States up to $200 billion per year according to the United States Department of Energy. Our products are fully sustainable and include battery energy storage that can be used during times of grid or hydrocarbon fueled generator failure or during public safety power shutoff (PSPS) as may be required in certain jurisdictions. Our primary focus in energy security is to ensure access to EV recharging infrastructure during grid failures, such as blackouts. As the adoption of EVs increases, it will be critical to have fuel (recharging) infrastructure that is not reliant on the utility grid with its centralized vulnerabilities. We have witnessed power outages in Texas due to cold weather, in California and New York due to hot weather and in other parts of the nation whenever inclement conditions such as high winds or flooding occur. California has also been susceptible to public safety power shutoffs (PSPS) to prevent fires during high wind events. There have been kinetic and cyber attacks on the grid and the U.S. government has evidence of intrusions by nefarious nation state actors. A recent Wall Street Journal article reported that attacks on the US power grid rose 71% in 2022 over 2021. A division of the grid oversight body known as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation found that ballistic damage, intrusion and vandalism largely drove this increase. All of these events constitute significant vulnerabilities which are expensive, disruptive, inconvenient, and dangerous. As we electrify our transportation fleets, these events may become catastrophic. The U.S. has a Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to ensure that it never runs out of gasoline and diesel, but there is no strategic electric reserve. In fact, many markets are operating at capacity during peak events.

Beam’s products provide a hedge against grid failures. Our EV ARC™ and Solar Tree® currently provide, and our EV Standard™ will provide, locally generated and stored electricity and are a highly robust and secure source of power to EVs. We are engaged with government officials at every level to increase awareness of our products and the benefits they can bring to energy security. We are increasingly hearing suggestions that 25% of all EV charging infrastructure should be independent of the centralized grid. We believe that our products are uniquely positioned to fulfill this need. Our current contracts with California, Florida, New York City, and the Federal government through our General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule Contract should ideally position us to take advantage of what we believe will be a significant increase for the requirements of robust and sustainable EV charging infrastructure. The Biden administration has stressed increased commitment to:

~~We believe that our products are ideally suited to fulfill all of these requirements.~~

As the value of traditional advertising media such as television, radio, and print diminish, advertisers in the United States and abroad are looking for new outlets to capture the attention of consumers. The Company believes there is opportunity in the outdoor advertising space to place outdoor content on Beam’s infrastructure products. One objective is to sell advertising space on our products to a company, with the proceeds being used to fund the delivery of EV ARC™ systems. Beam’s current focus in the media space is selling sponsorship and naming rights to networks of EV ARC™ systems deployed across major cities, using a similar model to the Citibike program in New York City. In 2012, Citigroup Inc. paid $41 million for five years of naming rights on New York’s bike sharing program. Citibank extended the naming rights agreement for $70 million to cover the period from 2019 to 2024. Beam intends to replicate this model with our Driving on Sunshine network. Because EV ARC™ systems are highly visible, we believe that they are an ideal platform for sponsored deployments wherein networks of EV ARC™ systems are deployed and owned by us and monetized through sponsorship and naming-rights agreements with corporate sponsors who are eager to have their brands associated with the “Driving on Sunshine” network. Our products also create significant reductions in greenhouse gas and CO2 emissions which, we believe, can be used as a further inducement to encourage corporations to sponsor the networks as they may benefit from the carbon offsets generated by a network of EV ARC™ systems. We believe that the EV ARC™ will provide 20 years of service (we have had them operating in the field for almost a decade to date) and will create a long-term recurring revenue stream from sponsorships. We believe that our Driving on Sunshine network will become more valuable as more EVs are used by the public.

In 2020, the Company entered into a collaboration agreement with the City of San Diego to deploy our solar-powered EV charging infrastructure products across San Diego (Driving on Sunshine network) and we have engaged a consultant to identify potential sponsors to take advantage of this naming rights platform. The consultant has elected not to take fees from us on retainer and instead provide services for a percentage of the revenues we derive from the Driving on Sunshine network in the event that we are successful with this endeavour. The percentage payment is calculated on and in addition to our pricing and therefore not dilutive to our profitability. We view this industry expert’s willingness to work for success only fees as an indication that this business model continues to have merit.

Beam’s target markets consist of several broad segments: state, municipal and federal governments and agencies, auto manufacturers, corporations, energy utility companies, universities, retail, hospitality and international markets. These segments can further be broken down into increasingly granular segments as different market opportunities are identified.

Beam’s largest customers include the U.S. Federal Government, including the Department of Homeland Security, United States Marine Corps, and many other federal agencies, the State of California, which is a conglomeration of California state agencies and municipalities, and the City of New York. Historically, the most attractive markets for Beam have been New York and California, but we have expanded the sale of units to 29 states throughout the U.S., as well as Puerto Rico and Canada. Currently the largest customer using our products is the US Army through our contract with TechFlow followed by the Veteran’s Administration purchased through the General Services Administration.

~~The factors below have been considered in determining favorable markets for our products:~~

Many of these factors have been important since the early days of EV adoption. Government tail winds are stronger than ever with many nations and states announcing the outright banning of gasoline and diesel vehicle sales during the next two decades. In the U.S., California, Oregon and the State of Washington have announced bans starting in 2035, less than seven years from now. In addition, automotive manufacturers have started production of electric vehicles which are more consistent with traditional car models that have been popular with U.S. consumers. Ford is selling an all-electric F150 pickup truck which launched in 2022. Since 1981, the F150 has been the most popular vehicle in the US and the top selling pickup truck for forty-two years in a row. The electric version of the F150 has the same towing and payload capacity and will be able to accelerate from 0 to 60 mph in under four seconds. GM has launched an electric Hummer which has 1000HP (compared to the gasoline version with 300HP) with a similar acceleration rate as the F150. A record number of new electric vehicles in the light-, medium- and heavy-duty categories were introduced in 2022.

We believe that the consumer will adopt EVs faster than many experts are predicting and that as a result, the requirement for growth in EV charging infrastructure will be more urgent than is currently forecasted or contemplated. We also believe that as the easiest (low hanging fruit) locations for grid-tied chargers are used up, the process of deploying traditionally installed and powered grid-tied EV chargers will become more expensive and time consuming. At the same time, we believe that we will continue to reduce the costs to produce our products and become faster at deploying them. During a period of significant and increasing demand, we believe that our scalability and rapid deployment will create a significant advantage for our products and our position in the market. We have recently demonstrated our ability to have a single person deploy two of our EV ARC™ systems, each capable of supporting as many as six EV chargers, in a customer parking lot at the same time.

The electric vehicle market is expected to grow at a rapid pace. Research reports indicate that the EV infrastructure market is expected to reach $222 Billion by 2030 which is a 31% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) between 2023 – 2030. California approved a plan for nearly $2.9 billion in funding for 90,000 new electric vehicle chargers in the state in December 2022 through its California Energy Commission. In addition, General Motors has committed to only offer zero-emissions vehicles by 2035 and six major automakers including Ford, Mercedes-Benz, Volvo and 3 others, along with 30 nations, signed a pledge to eliminate sales of new gas and diesel-powered cars by 2035 in leading markets. California’s Governor has also issued an executive order that by 2035, all new cars and passenger trucks sold in California must be zero-emission vehicles. Massachusetts and New Jersey have followed suit, as has the European Union, and others are expected to follow. ~~17 other states bind their emissions standards to California’s.~~ We currently operate in four rapidly growing markets: EV charging infrastructure, energy storage (batteries) outdoor media advertising and energy security and disaster preparedness. Our products are being used in 29 U.S. states, over 170 municipalities, three international countries, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands in the Caribbean. We believe that our products have a global appeal and that we are only at a very early stage in t~~he development of our sector. We believe that our strategic growth plan will enable us to increase our user base and revenues while increasing profitability. Our strategic growth plan includes:~~

Beam utilizes a combination of an in-house sales team and outside consultants and sells through a direct sales and marketing channel, pairing customers with our sales specialists, or Clean Mobility Experts, to ensure their needs are met.

Our sales process is heavily focused on educating prospective customers about our products. We have been heavily investing more in marketing materials and videos, and we have engaged a public relations firm to educate the market. Beam uses research to identify potential customers, as well as contacts established through trade show events and in-bound calls. We also utilize a combination of regional and industry focused campaigns, nurturing campaigns, speaking opportunities, product demonstrations, press releases and social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn). Beam is, we believe, an industry leader in the sustainable EV charging infrastructure space, and we use our website and social media to highlight our innovative products and offerings.

The sale of our products often have long sales cycles due to the large capital expense and sophisticated nature of our products though we have observed a reduction in the length of certain sales cycles along with an increase in the number of units ordered recently. We believe this is attributable to an increase in awareness and acceptance of our products as well as an increase in the urgency surrounding the deployment of EV charging infrastructure. Sales often rely on bureaucratic processes and funding approval which can result in extended sales cycles. We also support our customers by identifying grants and the federal grant process to reduce the cost of their purchase.

~~Our products may be eligible for various tax and other incentives which can significantly reduce the out-of-pocket expense paid by a customer for our products. Examples of these incentives include:~~

In addition, President Biden has made several commitments to the funding of clean energy and EV charging at the federal level and we believe the current administration will continue incentives for products such as ours in the future. Some of the federal and state funding programs include:

~~We believe that because our products are rapidly deployed, enhance energy security and are made in America, that we are well positioned to benefit from these and other initiatives.~~

In 2022 and 2021, we had two major customer contracts, the State of California and the General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) that accounted for a substantial portion of our revenue.

~~Contract with the California Department of General Services~~. The California Contract permits California state and local government agencies, including cities, counties, special districts, California State universities, University of California systems, K-12 school districts, and community colleges, to purchase EV ARCs™, ARC Mobility™ Trailers, and related accessories from us. The initial term of our contract with the California Department of General Services (the “California Contract”) was for one year with two extension options for one year, which were exercised. In June 2018, the California Contract was renewed for up to four more years (two years with two additional one-year options), and its scope was expanded to include more of our products, including our EV ARC™ DC Fast Charging Electric Vehicle Autonomous Renewable Charger, with a California estimated value of over $20 million. In January 2021, the contract was extended through June 2022 and was expanded so that it could be utilized by government agencies across the U.S. In June 2022, we were awarded a new three-year state-wide contract which can be used by state, local and municipal government entities throughout the U.S. We have sold 234 EV ARCs™ through this contract, for a total of $16.4 million through December 31, 2022, of which 73 units totaling $5.2 million were sold in 2022.

~~GSA MAS Contract~~. The GSA MAS contract is a five-year contract effective as of November 1, 2020, awarded by the GSA following an extensive evaluation process. This contract simplifies the federal procurement process and ensures best pricing. We sold 96 EV ARCs™ through this contract totaling $7.9 million in 2022.

We do not compete with EV charging companies or utilities. In fact, we support the major EV charging product and service providers by factory integrating their products onto ours prior to deployment. We have deployed ChargePoint, Blink, Enel, Electrify America and many other quality charging brands. We also do not compete with utilities who use our product as another tool to provide electricity, primarily for EV charging to their customers. We currently have seven utility customers and anticipate that that number will grow as more utilities become engaged in EV charging and also in deploying distributed generation resources to enhance grid stability. Our product is unique in that we are a complete solution for EV charging infrastructure requirements. Our product provides both a renewable energy source, and EV charging capability in a rapidly deployed and highly scalable construction-free format. We do compete with a number of companies which are involved in the design, construction and installation of fixed grid-connected EV charging stations that depend on the utility grid for a source of power, and on the construction and civil and electrical engineering services for the installation of traditional infrastructure.

Competition in the solar renewable energy and EV charging industries is intense, and competition is fragmented among a wide variety of entities. Companies such as Schneider, Eaton, Enel X, and Bosch manufacture EV charging units but do not offer charging services. There are many companies which offer installation services for the EV charging market. They are typically electrical and general contracting companies as well as some larger project management firms such as Black and Veatch, Bechtel, CH2M Hill and AECOM. Companies such as ChargePoint (NYSE: CHPT) and Blink (NASDAQ: BLNK) offer EV charging services and hardware but not, typically, installation. Our EV ARC™ units incorporate whatever charger the customer wants, so we are not competing with the charger company, but rather creating opportunities for them which they might not otherwise have had.

Many solar installation companies are now fixing EV chargers to their parking lot structures and some are offering packages combining solar rooftop installations and EV charger installations for the residential marketplace. These installations are almost always grid-tied, require construction and electrical work and do not include energy storage.

Another example of an entity which is providing free or discounted EV charging infrastructure is Electrify America, the EV charging provider is required to spend approximately $2 billion on EV charging infrastructure ($800 million in California) to satisfy the requirements of a settlement with the U.S. government. Electrify America is a customer of Beam Global and has used our products to assist in the expansion of their EV charging network.

We also face competition, to some extent, from entities which are offering free or discounted EV charging infrastructure to our prospective customers. Utilities such as the three large IOUs (investor-owned utilities) in California (SDG&E, PG&E, SCE) have successfully lobbied the California Public Utility Commission for permission to rate base the costs of installations of EV chargers. As a result, they can offer the installation, or “make readies” of electrical circuits and other civil infrastructure, for a lower price or in some instances for free, to certain customers. We are adding utilities to our customer base and have provided product to seven utilities to date. We do not view utilities as long-term competition and instead view them as a significant opportunity as they increasingly add off grid solutions to their energy mix.

Where energy security is concerned, we consider the competition from companies that produce generators and combined solar and storage solutions. Companies in this space range from small startup companies like Green Charge Networks to behemoths like General Electric and NEC. Siemens, Eaton, Schneider, Generac and other large electrical component companies are all also working on combined renewables/storage product solutions. We are in contact with all these companies and have not observed that any of them have a product which provides all the same value and differentiation that our EV ARC™ product delivers because our EV ARC™ systems are transportable, rapidly deployed and offer multiple layers of value beyond EV charging and emergency power. For example, during 2020, some of our EV ARC™ products were repurposed by our customers from customer locations to Covid-19 Emergency Pop-Up Centers to provide remote emergency power and EV charging.

We are headquartered in San Diego, California in a leased building of approximately 53,000 square feet professionally equipped to handle the significant growth possibilities we believe are in front of us. The facility houses our corporate operations, sales, design, engineering and product manufacturing. In 2022, we were staffed for one shift, five days a week and believe that at that level we can produce approximately 260 EV ARC™ units per year. We also believe that with an expansion of human resources, capital investment, increased engagement of contract manufacturing and operating extra shifts, we could produce approximately 4,000 EV ARC™ units a year from our current facility. As a result of our recent acquisition of All Cell in 2022, we also lease an 18,000 sq/ft facility in Broadview, Illinois where we produce our energy storage products for our own products and also for a variety of other customers who need energy storage solutions.

All of our products are currently designed, developed and manufactured in one or other of these facilities. We have been able to reduce our costs and improve our quality by performing fabrication in-house. This also provides a good environment for improving the manufacturing process as well as for the development of new products. Many of our suppliers are local which allows for shorter lead times and lower transportation costs. The EV ARC™ product family requires no field installation work and is typically delivered to the customer site by us or by a third-party transportation company for a fee. We sell our Solar Tree® products as an engineered kit of parts to be installed by third parties employed by the buyer of the Solar Tree® kit.

We continually endeavor to reduce component costs and make production and design improvements in both our products and our processes to reduce our manufacturing costs, while maintaining the high quality for which we strive. As unit sales continue to increase, we anticipate that we will be able to spread our fixed overhead costs over more units, reducing the cost per unit.

During 2022, 62% of our revenue was attributable to federal, state and local governments, compared to 87% in 2021. Furthermore, 23% of our revenue was attributable to the state agencies and municipalities in the State of California, compared to 55% in 2021.

Our backlog at December 31, 2022 was $59.3 million, of which $58.8 million is deliverable within twelve months. Our backlog at December 31, 2021 was $4.1 million, of which $3.9 million is deliverable within twelve months. Reported backlog represents firm purchase orders or contracts received by customers for deliveries scheduled in the future.

Businesses in general are subject to extensive regulation at the federal, state, and local level. We are subject to extensive government regulation relating to employment, health, safety, working conditions, labor relations, and the environment in the course of the conduct of our business. In order for our customers to enable the installation of some of our products, they can be required to obtain permits from local and other governmental agencies. In the event that our customers elect to connect our products to the utility grid, they must comply with the applicable rules and regulations of the relevant state public utility agencies. In order for our customers to take advantage of available tax and other governmental incentives associated with the installation of solar power production facilities, and the production and use or sale of solar power, they must comply with the applicable regulatory terms and conditions. Changes to new government regulations may have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results, and financial condition.

As of the date of this report, we have 131 employees, of which 30 are temporary employees. Most of the temporary employees are retained through a temporary employment agency to maximize our flexibility and to reduce the risks and costs associated with permanent employees. We believe our employee relations to be good. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or collective bargaining agreement.

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information contained in this report on Form 10-K, including the section of this report titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes. If any of the events described in the following risk factors and the risks described elsewhere in this report occurs, our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed. This report on Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors that are described below and elsewhere in this report.

~~We have sustained recurring losses since inception and expect to incur additional losses in the foreseeable future.~~ We were formed on June 12, 2006 and have reported annual net losses since inception. For our fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we experienced net losses of $19.7 million and $6.6 million, respectively, including cash and noncash expenses under generally accepted accounting principles). Non-cash expenses including depreciation, amortization, non-cash compensation and contingent consideration included in the above losses are $9.2 million and $1.3 million for fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. Further, as of December 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $77.3 million. In addition, we expect to incur additional losses in the future, and there can be no assurance that we will achieve profitability. Our future viability, profitability and growth depend upon our ability to raise capital and successfully operate and expand our operations. We cannot assure that any of our efforts will prove successful or that we will not continue to incur operating losses.

~~We may need to raise additional capital or financing to continue to execute and expand our business.~~ Our net proceeds from a public offering in 2020 helped to fund our operations for recent years. On September 2, 2022, we entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with B. Riley, under which the Company has the right, in its sole discretion, to sell to B. Riley up to $30.0 million, or a maximum of 2.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at 97% of the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s common stock. However, there is no guarantee that we can raise capital using this vehicle at terms that are acceptable to the Company if we need to fund investment in our business or if it takes longer than expected to achieve positive cashflow. We may be required to pursue sources of additional capital through various means, including sale and leasing arrangements, and debt or equity financings. If the amount of capital we are able to raise from financing activities, together with our revenues from operations, is not sufficient to satisfy our capital needs, we may have to reduce our operations accordingly.

~~Our revenues are concentrated in a small number of customers and they may decrease significantly if we were to lose one of these customers~~. We have a few large customers including the State of California’s Department of General Services and the City of New York that generated 16% and 6%, respectively, of revenues in 2022 and 38% and 2%, respectively, of revenues in 2021. In addition, we were awarded several federal contracts in 2022, that may not be repeated in the future. The contract with the State of California can be used by a diverse group of state and local agencies within the state or across the country for the purchase of our products. The receipt of orders under this contract has been irregular and can create fluctuation in our revenues. In addition, there is no obligation for this customer to purchase any additional units, or to renew the contract when it expires. The State of California contract will expire on June 23, 2025.

~~Our revenue growth depends on consumers’ willingness to adopt electric vehicles.~~ Our growth is highly dependent upon the adoption of electric vehicles (“EV”), and we are subject to a risk of any reduced demand for EVs. If the market for EVs does not gain broad market acceptance or develops more slowly than we expect, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be harmed. The market for alternative fuel vehicles is relatively new, rapidly evolving, characterized by rapidly changing technologies, price competition, additional competitors, evolving government regulation and industry standards, frequent new vehicle announcements, long development cycles for EV original equipment manufacturers, and changing consumer demands and behaviors. Factors that may influence the purchase and use of alternative fuel vehicles, and specifically EVs, include:

The influence of any of these factors may negatively impact the widespread consumer adoption of EVs, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

~~We may acquire other businesses, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and harm our business, revenue and financial results.~~

As part of our business strategy, we intend to make acquisitions to add complementary companies, products or technologies, such as our recent acquisition of All Cell. Our acquisitions may not achieve our goals, and we may not realize benefits from acquisitions. Any integration process will require significant time and resources, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully. If we fail to successfully integrate acquisitions, or the personnel or technologies associated with those acquisitions, the business, revenue and financial results of the combined company could be harmed. We may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired assets and accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition, including accounting charges. We may also incur unanticipated liabilities that we assume as a result of acquiring companies. We may have to pay cash, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, each of which could affect our financial condition or the value of our securities. We would expect to finance any future acquisitions through a combination of additional issuances of equity, corporate indebtedness or cash from operations. The sale of equity to finance any such acquisitions could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could also include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations. In the future, we may not be able to find other suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. Our acquisition strategy could require significant management attention, disrupt our business and harm our business, revenue and financial results.

We are dependent on a limited number of suppliers for our battery cells, and in the current market, there is a risk that these suppliers will not be able to provide cells at prices and volumes acceptable to us, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

We source battery cells from a few suppliers, but the demand for cells and for lithium has increased over the past year with the increase in electrification and the growing demand for electric vehicles. It is possible that our suppliers will not have adequate supply to cover our demand, or the price of the cells will increase due to shortages, impacting our ability to ship units and/or cause the price of our products to increase. While we believe that we will be able to establish additional supplier relationships for our battery cells, we may be unable to do so in the short term or at all at prices, quality or costs that are favorable to us.

~~We face intense competition, and many of our competitors have substantially greater resources than we do.~~ We are not aware of other companies that provide a similar infrastructure product that we do, utilizing solar energy to power EV charging in a transportable product. However, we compete with traditional grid-tied charging stations. Our challenge is to market our products to ensure that potential customers in this industry are aware of our product offering. Competition in the solar renewable energy and EV charging industries is intense, and competition is fragmented among a wide variety of entities. We operate in a highly competitive environment that is characterized by price fluctuations and rapid technological change. Our competitors often have greater market recognition and substantially greater resources than we do. Competition in our market may intensify in the future. Competitors may develop products that may ultimately have costs similar to, or lower than, our projected costs. If we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer and we may lose or be unable to gain market share and our business and results of operations would be adversely affected.

~~A significant portion of our revenue is derived from our core product category.~~ We are dependent on revenues from our EV ARC™ product to be successful in the future. While we now have energy storage products following our acquisition of AllCell Technologies, Inc. in 2022 and we offer our Solar Tree product and we intend to bring our EV Standard™ product to market, no assurance can be given that our EV ARC™ sales will continue to have market acceptance or that they will continue to grow in the future. The loss or reduction of sales of this product category could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, and liquidity.

~~The renewably energized EV charging industry, is an emerging market that is constantly evolving and may not develop to the size or at the rate we expect.~~ Solar and wind powered EV charging, is an emerging and constantly evolving market. We believe the industry may take several years to fully develop and mature, and we cannot be certain that the market will grow at the rate we expect. Any future growth of EV charging, and the success of our products depend on many factors beyond our control. These factors include without limitation recognition and acceptance of EVs and EV charging products by customers and users, the pricing of alternative sources of energy, a favorable regulatory environment, the continuation of expected tax benefits and other incentives and our ability to provide our product offerings cost-effectively. If the markets for EV charging do not develop at the rate we expect, our business may be adversely affected.

~~Tariffs imposed pursuant to Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 could significantly and adversely affect our business, revenues, margins, results of operations, and cash flows.~~ We currently have no plans to use solar modules which are subject to tariffs, however on January 23, 2018, the President of the United States issued Proclamation 9693, which approved recommendations to impose safeguard tariffs on imported solar cells and modules, based on the investigations, findings, and recommendations of the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “International Trade Commission”). Recently, we have purchased solar panels exclusively from one supplier who is exempt from these tariffs. However, additional tariffs were imposed on other products, including cells used in our batteries. It is possible that tariffs may increase the costs and restrict the supply of certain of our components, causing us harm. The imposition of tariffs is likely to result in a wide range of impacts on the targeted U.S. industries and the global market in general. Such tariffs, if our products or the parts we use to manufacture our products are ultimately determined to be subject to them, could result in significant additional costs to us. If we elected to pass such increase in costs on to our customers, they could cause a significant reduction in demand for our products.

Existing regulations and policies and changes to these policies may present technical, regulatory, and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar power products, which may significantly reduce demand for our products and services. The market for electric generation products is heavily influenced by federal, state and local government laws, regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry in the United States and abroad, as well as policies adopted by electric utilities. Changes that make solar power less competitive with other power sources could result in a significant reduction in the demand for our products. The market for electric generation equipment is also influenced by trade and local content laws, regulations and policies that can discourage growth and competition in the solar industry and create economic barriers to the purchase of solar power products, thus reducing demand for our products. Any new regulations or policies pertaining to our products may result in significant additional expenses to us, which could cause a significant reduction in demand for our solar power products.

~~In high demand locations, the use of our products could exhaust their electricity supply on particular days, even with our storage batteries.~~ Our solar products create and store electricity during daylight hours. While this process has generally been effective to meet daily EV charging and energy storage demand, it is possible that heavy charging could cause a power draw exceeding the onboard electricity generation and storage capacity. In such instances, except for our grid-connected products, the EV charger would have to recharge through solar energy replenishment or other direct outside charge before EV charging could resume.

~~Developments in alternative technologies or improvements in distributed solar energy generation may have a material adverse effect on demand for our offerings.~~ Significant developments in alternative technologies, such as advances in other forms of distributed solar power generation, storage solutions, such as batteries, the widespread use or adoption of fuel cells for residential or commercial properties or improvements in other forms of centralized power production, transmission and distribution, may have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. Any failure by us to adopt new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to changes in existing technologies, could result in product obsolescence, the loss of competitiveness of our products, decreased revenue and a loss of market share to competitors.

Defects or performance problems in our products could result in loss of customers, reputational damage, and decreased revenue, and we may face warranty, indemnity, and product liability claims arising from defective products. Although our products meet our stringent quality requirements, they may contain undetected errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new generations are released. Errors, defects, or poor performance can arise due to design flaws, defects in raw materials or components or manufacturing difficulties, which can affect both the quality and the yield of the product. Any actual or perceived errors, defects, or poor performance in our products could result in the replacement or recall of our products, shipment delays, rejection of our products, damage to our reputation, lost revenue, diversion of our engineering personnel from our product development efforts, and increases in customer service and support costs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

~~We may be subject to product liability claims~~. If one of our products were to cause injury to someone or cause property damage, including as a result of product malfunctions, defects, or improper installation, then we could be exposed to product liability claims. We could incur significant costs and liabilities if we are sued and if damages are awarded against us. Further, any product liability claim we face could be expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention. The successful assertion of a product liability claim against us could result in potentially significant monetary damages, penalties or fines, subject us to adverse publicity, damage our reputation and competitive position, and adversely affect sales of our products. In addition, product liability claims, injuries, defects, or other problems experienced by other companies in the solar industry could lead to unfavorable market conditions for the industry as a whole and may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract new customers, thus harming our growth and financial performance.

~~If we are unable to keep up with advances in EV technology, we may suffer a decline in our competitive position.~~ The EV industry is characterized by rapid technological change. We do not manufacture the EV service equipment (EVSE) which connects to the EV, rather, we deliver power to other vendors’ EVSE products. As such, we believe that we are less prone to impacts caused by changes in EV technology. Nevertheless, if we are unable to keep up with changes in EV technology or the costs associated with such changes, our competitive position may deteriorate which would materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. As technologies change, we plan to upgrade or adapt our EV products in order to continue to provide EV charging services with the latest technology.

~~If a third party asserts that we are infringing upon its intellectual property, it could be costly and time-consuming litigation, and our business may be harmed.~~ The EV and EV charging industries are characterized by the existence of a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. Although we are not presently aware of any current or threatened third party intellectual property rights claims against the Company, there is a risk that the Company could face third party intellectual rights claims against its products and challenges to the validity or enforceability of its products and trademarks in the future which could harm our relationships with our customers, may deter future customers from subscribing to our services or could expose us to litigation with respect to these claims.

~~The success of our business depends in large part on our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights.~~ We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, service mark, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. We cannot assure you, however, that we will be successful in obtaining these patents, service marks or trademarks, or that these applications will not be challenged, that others will not attempt to infringe upon our rights, or that these filings will afford us adequate protection or competitive advantages. If we are unable to protect our rights to our intellectual property or if such property infringes on the rights of others, our business could be materially adversely affected.

The success of our business depends on the continuing contributions of Desmond Wheatley and other key personnel who may terminate their employment with us at any time, and we will need to hire additional qualified personnel. We rely heavily on the services of Desmond Wheatley, our chairman and chief executive officer, as well as other management personnel. The Compensation Committee has structured a long-term compensation plan to retain key employees, however, loss of the services of any such individuals would adversely impact our operations. In addition, we believe our technical personnel represent a significant asset and provide us with a competitive advantage over many of our competitors. Our future success will depend upon our ability to retain these key employees and our ability to attract and retain other skilled financial, engineering, technical and managerial personnel.

~~If we are unable to attract, train and retain highly qualified personnel, the quality of our services may decline and we may not successfully execute our growth strategies.~~ Our success depends in large part upon our ability to continue to attract, train, motivate and retain highly skilled and experienced employees, including technical personnel. The loss of personnel or our inability to hire or retain sufficient personnel at competitive rates of compensation could impair our ability to secure and complete customer engagements and could harm our business.

~~We are exposed to various possible claims and hazards relating to our business, and our insurance may not fully protect us.~~ Although we maintain modest theft, casualty, liability, cyber and property insurance coverage, along with worker’s compensation and related insurance, we cannot assure that we will not incur uninsured liabilities and losses as a result of the conduct of our business. In particular, we may incur liability if one or more of our other products are deemed to have caused a personal injury. Should uninsured losses occur, they would have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition, and business performance.

~~We may face litigation in the future.~~ As a manufacturer and seller of goods, we are exposed to the risk of litigation for a variety of reasons in addition to reasons relating to intellectual property rights, product liability lawsuits, employee lawsuits, commercial contract disputes, government enforcement actions, and other legal proceedings. We cannot assure that future litigation in which we may become involved will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results, business performance, and business reputation.

~~The costs incurred by us to develop and manufacture our products may be higher than anticipated which could hurt our ability to earn a profit.~~ We may incur substantial cost overruns in the development, manufacture, and distribution of products. The cost of production materials increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and they continue to be higher than pre-pandemic days. Unanticipated costs may force us to obtain additional capital or financing from other sources and would hinder our ability to earn a profit. If we incur cost overruns, there is no assurance that we could obtain the financing or capital to cover them.

~~The equipment comprising our products currently charge at rates that are comparable to the average charging speed of competitors, but that may change in the future.~~ Our standard EV ARC™ as a stand-alone does not provide a DC Fast Charge, rather, it charges EVs at a Level II pace which is consistent with the majority of installed EV chargers in the U.S. To date, we have found that since most EV trips are relatively short and local, the standard EV ARC™ has satisfied consumer demand. Our EV ARC™ HP DC Fast Charging Electric Vehicle Autonomous Renewable Charger can provide a DC Fast Charge, so we believe we can compete in that market. Nevertheless, the demand for faster EV charging may increase in the future, requiring us to adjust our marketing and sales strategies. There is no assurance that our equipment will remain competitive in the market in the future, causing possible customer complaints and claims, and the loss of sales in the future.

~~Our Company depends on key suppliers~~. The Company sources its materials and components from a wide variety of vendors. They are standard off-the-shelf components, but these components differ between manufacturers in terms of their specifications and performance. If one of these components became unavailable, it could hinder our ability to operate profitably and have a material adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition and business performance. We may be able to secure supply from another source and incorporate it in our design, but it would require modifications which could impact product deliveries. For these components, we maintain adequate supply to mitigate any supply risk.

~~We have experienced technological changes in our industry. New technologies may prove inappropriate and result in liability to us or may not gain market acceptance by our customers.~~ The industries in which we operate are subject to constant technological change. Our future success will depend on our ability to appropriately respond to changing technologies and changes in function of products and quality. If we adopt products and technologies that are not attractive to consumers, we may not be successful in capturing or retaining a significant share of our market. In addition, some new technologies are relatively untested and unperfected and may not perform as expected or as desired, in which event our adoption of such products or technologies may cause us to lose money.

Existing regulations, and changes to such regulations, may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of our products, which may significantly reduce demand for our products. Installation of a small number of our products is subject to oversight and regulation in accordance with national and local ordinances, building codes, zoning, environmental protection regulation, utility interconnection requirements for metering and other rules and regulations. In particular, our new EV Standard™ product, designed to provide curbside EV charging through existing or newly installed street lampposts owned by municipalities and utilities, will require close cooperation with, and supervision by, local government agencies. We attempt to keep up-to-date about these requirements on a national, state, and local level, and must design systems to comply with varying standards. Certain cities may have ordinances that increase the cost of installation of our products. In addition, new government regulations or utility policies pertaining to power systems are unpredictable and may result in significant additional expenses or delays in the installation of our grid-connected products and, as a result, could cause a significant reduction in demand, especially for our EV Standard™ product.

~~Our media branding and advertising strategy may not be profitable.~~ We are able to equip our EV ARC™ and Solar Tree® platforms with digital advertising screens with content that can be controlled directly, and in some cases, remotely. We may also sell other forms of media across our product platforms, such as naming rights or sponsorship deals, as well as traditional fixed media. There is no assurance that the revenue model crafted for this capability will be successful or profitable or will not result in operating losses or rejection by government regulators or consumers. Sponsors and advertisers for the service may not materialize or be willing to pay the rates sought by us or our customers.

Our business may be impacted by the availability to our customers of rebates, tax credits and other financial incentives, the reduction, elimination or uncertainty of which would reduce the demand for our products. Many states offer substantial incentives to offset the cost of solar power systems, battery storage systems and EV charging infrastructure. These incentives can take many forms, including direct rebates, state tax credits, system performance payments and Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). Moreover, the federal government currently offers a 30% tax credit for the installation of solar power systems and associated energy storage systems. This credit is in effect until 2032. There are additional federal grants available that encourage renewable investment. Businesses may also elect to accelerate the depreciation on their systems in the first year of ownership. Uncertainty about the introduction of, reduction in, or elimination of such incentives, or delays or interruptions in the implementation of favorable federal or state laws could substantially increase the cost of our systems to some of our customers, potentially resulting in significant reductions in demand for our products from non-governmental customers, which would negatively impact our sales.

~~Our business strategy may depend on the widespread adoption of solar power and EV charging technology.~~ The market for solar power products is emerging and rapidly evolving, and its future success is uncertain. If solar power technology proves unsuitable for widespread commercial deployment or if demand for solar power products fails to develop sufficiently, we could be unable to generate enough revenues to achieve and sustain profitability and positive cash flow. The factors influencing the widespread adoption of solar power technology include but are not limited to:

~~Compliance with new and existing environmental laws and rules is required.~~ Compliance with new and existing environmental laws and rules could significantly increase construction and start-up costs for our customers, deterring customers from purchasing a small sub-set of our products and services. To install Beam’s Solar Tree® products, our customers may be required to obtain and comply with a number of permitting requirements. As a condition of granting necessary permits, regulators could make demands that increase our customers’ expected costs of construction and operations, in which case they may delay or cancel delivery of certain sub-sets of our products. Environmental issues, such as contamination and compliance with applicable environmental standards could arise at any time during the construction and operation of a customer’s project. If this occurs, it could require a customer to spend additional resources to remedy the issues and may delay or prevent construction or operation of the project. This is why we have focused on the development of autonomous infrastructure products which do not require construction for their deployment.

~~The success of our product offering may in some instances require the availability of locations provided by municipalities or private owners of real estate.~~ Our ability to sell branding opportunities or licenses could be highly dependent on the availability of real estate to locate our product, or municipal approval for visible branding. We cannot assure that these rights will be available to us in the future or will be available on terms acceptable to us. The lack of availability of these rights could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in our media business unit. We may operate part of our business in which leasing or licensing agreements with venues or municipalities are necessary, so the long-term success of this aspect of our business could depend upon our ability to initiate such agreements and to renew these agreements upon their termination. We cannot assure that we will be able to renew these agreements on acceptable terms or at all, or that we will be able to obtain attractive agreements with substitute venues.

~~Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions at which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.~~

We maintain substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in accounts with U.S. banks and financial institutions, including Silicon Valley Bank ("SVB"), and our deposits at these institutions exceed insured limits. Market conditions can impact the viability of these institutions. For example, on March 10, 2023, SVB was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver. The FDIC created a successor bridge bank, Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. (“SVBB”), and all deposits of SVB were transferred to SVBB under a systemic risk exception approved by the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the FDIC. While the Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury Department, and the FDIC announced in a joint statement on March 12, 2023 that all SVB deposits, including both insured and uninsured amounts, would be available in full to account holders, a similar failure of any of the financial institutions where we maintain our cash and cash equivalents could impact our ability to access uninsured funds in a timely manner or at all. There is no guarantee that the Federal Reserve Board, the U.S. Treasury Department and the FDIC will provide access to uninsured funds in the future in the event of the closure of any other banks or financial institutions in a timely fashion or at all. Any inability to access or delay in accessing these funds could adversely affect our business, financial position, and liquidity.

If we do not effectively diversify our bank deposits and investment portfolio, the value and liquidity of our investments may fluctuate substantially which could affect our access to capital and results of operations in a material way. Furthermore, our access to our cash and cash equivalents in amounts adequate to finance our operations could be significantly impaired if the financial institutions with which we have arrangements directly face liquidity constraints or failures. Investor concerns regarding the U.S. or international financial systems could result in less favorable commercial financing terms, including higher interest rates or costs and tighter financial and operating covenants, or systemic limitations on access to credit and liquidity sources, thereby making it more difficult for us to acquire financing on acceptable terms or at all. Any material decline in available funding or our ability to access our cash and cash equivalents could adversely impact our results of operations and liquidity.

Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq could result in a delisting of our common stock, which could negatively impact the market price and liquidity of our common shares and our ability to access the capital markets. Our common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of Nasdaq, such as the corporate governance requirements and the minimum bid price requirement, Nasdaq may take steps to delist our common stock. Such a delisting would have a negative effect on the price of our common stock, impair the ability to sell or purchase our common stock when persons wish to do so, and any delisting materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital or pursue strategic restructuring, refinancing or other transactions on acceptable terms, or at all. Delisting from the Nasdaq Capital Market could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities. In the event of a delisting, we would attempt to take actions to restore our compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our common stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our common stock, prevent our common stock from dropping below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting. This material weakness could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our results of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner. If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting, our stock price could decline and raising capital could be more difficult. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation in those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could significantly decline, and our business and financial condition could be adversely affected. If material weaknesses or significant deficiencies are discovered or if we otherwise fail to achieve and maintain the adequacy of our internal control, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock could decline significantly.

We currently do not have effective manufacturing or purchasing systems in place to track inventory and purchasing transactions or a perpetual inventory system. The Company performs manual processes during the year to track and control our inventory and purchases. While these processes provide good results in determining inventory and cost of sales transactions, as we grow, it has become a very time-consuming process and could impact our ability to submit timely reporting. We are implementing new systems beginning in January 2023 with scheduled completion by the end of Q2 to automate these functions which we believe will alleviate the material weakness in 2023. However, we can give no assurance that such measures will remediate the material weakness identified or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future.

~~Our stock price may be volatile.~~ The public market trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile, may decline, and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

In addition, the securities markets have from time-to-time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

~~Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.~~ If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or upon the expiration of any statutory holding period under Rule 144 or issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, the market price of our common stock could decline because of or in anticipation of the selling pressure. The existence of anticipated sales, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

Our corporate headquarters are located at 5660 Eastgate Dr., San Diego, California 92121. We lease approximately 53,000 square feet of office and warehouse space pursuant to a five-year lease that extends through August 30, 2025, with two one-year renewal options. Our Chicago, Illinois office consisting of 15,582 square feet of office and warehouse space is located at 2600 S. 25^th ~~Avenue, Suite Z, Broadview, Illinois, 60155 with lease term through August 31~~^st~~, 2023. We are in the process of locating a new facility.~~

The Company may be involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time. As of December 31, 2022, and the date of this report, the Company is not involved in any material litigation matters.

~~Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “BEEM.”~~

On March 23, 2023, there were approximately 196 holders of record of our common stock. Because some of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial stockholders represented by these record holders.

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We can give no assurances that we will ever have excess funds available to pay dividends.

Beam develops, manufactures and sells high-quality, renewably energized infrastructure products for electric vehicle charging infrastructure, energy storage, energy security, disaster preparedness and outdoor media advertising.

The Company has designed five product lines that incorporate our proprietary technology for producing a unique alternative to grid-tied charging, having a built-in renewable energy source in the form of attached solar panels and/or light wind generator to produce power and battery storage to store the power. These products are rapidly deployable and attractively designed. Our product lines include:

In addition, with the acquisition of All Cell Technologies, LLC (“All Cell”) in March 2022, we now offer Beam AllCell™ energy storage technology with a highly flexible lithium-ion and lithium iron phosphate battery platform architecture. The battery design uses a proprietary phase change material which provides a low-cost thermal management solution and a unique safety mechanism to prevent propagation of thermal runaway. They are ideally suited for applications where energy density, safety and specialized enclosures require high power in small spaces. Drones, submersibles, medical and recreational products and a host of micro mobility products benefit from this technology. Beam is already using AllCell™ energy storage products in EV ARC™ products for EV charging and plans to incorporate this battery technology in our new product designs that are under development.

We believe that there is a clear need for a rapidly deployable and highly scalable EV charging infrastructure, and that our products fulfill that requirement. Unlike grid-tied installations which require general and electrical contractors, engineers, consultants, digging trenches, permitting, pouring concrete, wiring, and ongoing utility bills, the EV ARC™ system can be deployed in minutes, not months, and is powered by renewable energy so there is no utility bill. We are agnostic as to the EV charging service equipment or provider and integrate best of breed solutions based upon our customer’s requirements. For example, our EV ARC™ and Solar Tree® products have been deployed with Chargepoint, Blink, Enel X, Electrify America and other high quality EV charging solutions. We can make recommendations to customers, or we can comply with their specifications and/or existing charger networks. Our products replace the infrastructure required to support EV chargers, not the chargers themselves. We do not sell EV charging, rather we sell products which enable it.

~~We believe our chief differentiators for our electric vehicle charging infrastructure products are:~~

Our revenues increased from $9.0 million in 2021 to $22.0 million in 2022 we believe as a result of the ongoing maturation of the electric vehicle ecosystem, increased urgency for charging infrastructure as more EVs are adopted, an increased understanding of the challenges facing the installation and operation of utility grid-tied chargers and due to an increased investment in sales and marketing resources over the past two years. During the year ended December 31, 2022, product sales were generated from a wide variety of markets, including state and local government agencies, federal customers, commercial businesses, colleges and utilities. In 2022, a 52-unit EV ARC™ purchase was made under our contract with the State of California to provide sustainable EV charging and emergency power for 12 state government agencies in California. In 2022, we also received an order for $5.3 million from New York City to deliver EV ARCs^TM throughout the city. As a result of our acquisition of All Cell in March 2022, we generated revenues of $5.2 million from sales of our solid, state-of-the-art energy storage product. In late 2020, we entered into a Multiple Award Schedule Contract with the General Services Administration (GSA) that helps streamline purchases from Federal agencies and state and local governments. In addition, the General Services Administration (GSA) awarded Beam Global a federal blanket purchase agreement (BPA) which provides federal agencies a streamlined procurement process for procuring EV ARC™ systems. We have also invested in our federal business channel by adding a federal lobbyist, a federal business development resource and a government relations employee. These resources have helped to identify opportunities on the federal side and are increasing awareness of our product and outreach with federal agencies. They are also able to support language in legislature to increase opportunities for federal contracts or federal grants and other funding. This resulted in several large federal orders in 2022, including a $29.4 million order through Techflow, Inc. for the US Army (IMCOM), a $11.7 million order for the General Services Administration for the Department of Veterans Affairs, and several other orders for the Department of Homeland Security, US Navy Facilities, US Marine Corps, and others. In addition, there is increased support for funding EV charging infrastructure on the state and federal level, as well as a number of federal grants available in addition to the 30% Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit and Rule 179 accelerated depreciation which provide a strong financial incentive for many of our target commercial customers. We expect the electric vehicle market to continue to experience significant growth over the next decade as evidenced by 61 new electric vehicles that were launched in 2022 which will require additional EV charging infrastructure. We believe our products are uniquely positioned to benefit from this growth.

We continued to made progress in finding a sponsor for our outdoor media advertising business during 2022, working with The Superlative Group, an industry leading consultant engaged in the selling of corporate sponsorships and have identified several potential corporate sponsors for a global naming rights agreement to our network of EV ARC™ systems. Superlative is compensated only when they are successful in securing a sponsor for our Driving on Sunshine network. This business model can be replicated in other cities throughout the country. Our energy security business is connected with the deployment of our EV charging infrastructure products and serves as an additional benefit to the value proposition of our charging products which, along with their integrated emergency power panels, can continue to operate, charge EVs, and deliver emergency power during utility grid failures. Our state-of-the-art storage batteries installed on our EV charging systems are immune to grid failures and provide another benefit for customers such as municipalities, counties, states, the federal government, hospitals, fire departments, large private enterprises with substantial facilities, and vehicle fleet operators.

We have begun development on our newest patented products - our EV Standard™ and UAV ARC™, which we expect will expand our product offerings with the same proprietary technology as our current products and allow us to expand into new markets.

Several contributing factors resulted in reporting a gross loss in both 2022 and 2021. We currently have a fixed overhead structure and facility that is underutilized but will support our expected growth over the next several years. As our revenues continue to increase, and we increase our production volumes, we will continue to increase our fixed overhead absorption which reduces our fixed overhead cost allocation per unit, as well as benefit from improved labor efficiencies and utilization and cost improvements by negotiating volume purchase discounts. We are also implementing lean manufacturing process improvements and making engineering changes to our product which we believe will result in further cost reductions. Many of the components that we integrate into our products are manufactured by others. This is consistent with our strategy to take advantage of the investment by large and well-funded organizations in the improvement of various components and sub-assemblies which we integrate into our final product. We experienced cost increases on many of our components during 2021 and 2022, most notably our steel cost, which were brought on by supply chain issues resulting from plant closures and staffing shortages during the Covid-19 pandemic. In late 2022, we started to see these increases flatten out and some are starting to decrease, and we expect to see a reduction in the cost of our bill of materials. Batteries are the highest cost contributor to our bill of materials, but with the March 2022 purchase of AllCell Technologies, LLC, a lithium-ion battery manufacturer, we expect those costs to be significantly reduced. We have design changes to our EV ARC^TM planned for 2023 that will reduce component costs and streamline the manufacturing process which will reduce the cost. We continually review the components and sub-assemblies which we manufacture or assemble in-house for which we intend to seek outsourced contracted manufacturing expertise. We believe that outsourcing certain components and sub-assemblies will further reduce our costs, increase our gross margins, and significantly increase the potential output from our factory. We expect to see a significant increase in the demand for electric vehicle charging infrastructure and as such we do not anticipate significant pricing pressure on our products. The combination of this increase in demand for electric vehicle charging infrastructure and our revenues, and the cost cutting measures described above lead us to believe that we will see significant improvement in our gross margins in the near future.

~~Please refer to Note 1 in the financial statements for further information on the Company’s critical accounting policies which are summarized as follows:~~

~~Business Combination.~~ The purchase price of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. To the extent the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets assumed, such excess is allocated to goodwill. The Company determines the estimated fair values after review and consideration of relevant information, including discounted cash flows and estimates made by management. The Company records the net assets and results of operations of an acquired entity from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and are expensed as incurred.

Contingent consideration liability is recognized at the estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of contingent consideration liability are recognized in operating expenses in the statement of operations. Contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition consists of commercial milestone payments and are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of commercial milestone payments reflects management’s estimates of discount rates and probability of achieving certain milestones. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are recognized in operating expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

~~Inventory.~~ Inventory is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method of accounting. Inventory costs primarily relate to purchased raw materials and components used in the manufacturing of our products, work in process for products being manufactured, and finished goods. Included in these costs are direct labor and certain manufacturing overhead costs associated with normal capacity in the manufacturing process. The Company regularly reviews inventory components and quantities on hand and performs annual physical inventory counts.

~~Impairment of Long-lived Assets.~~ The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10-35-15 “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

~~Revenue Recognition.~~ Beam follows the revenue standards of Financial Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The core principle of this Topic is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue is recognized in accordance with that core principle by applying the following five steps: 1) identify the contracts with a customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and 5) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation.

Revenues are primarily derived from the direct sales of manufactured products. Revenues may also consist of maintenance fees for the maintenance of previously sold products and revenues from sales of professional services.

Revenues from inventoried product are recognized upon the final delivery of such product to the customer or when legal transfer of ownership takes place. Revenue values are fixed price arrangements determined at the time an order is placed or a contract is entered into. The customer is typically obligated to make payment for such products within a 30-45 day period after delivery.

Revenues from maintenance fees for services provided by the Company are recognized equally over the period of the maintenance term. Revenue values are fixed price arrangements determined at the time an order is placed or a contract is entered into. The customer is typically obligated to make payment for the service in advance of the maintenance period.

Extended maintenance or warranty services, where the customer has the option to purchase this extension as a separate purchase option, are considered a separate performance obligation. If the Company does not control the extended services, in terms of having the responsibility for fulfillment of the obligation or the option to choose who will perform the services, the Company is acting as an agent and would report the revenues on a net basis.

Revenues from professional services for relocations, charger replacements or out of warranty repairs are recognized as services are performed. Revenue values are based upon fixed fee arrangements or hourly fee-based arrangements with agreed to hourly rates of service categories in line with expertise requirements. These services are billed to a customer as such services are provided and the customer will be obligated to make payments for such services typically within a 30-45 day period.

~~The Company includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers as revenues and shipping and handling costs as cost of revenues.~~

Any deposits received from a customer prior to delivery of the purchased product or monies paid prior to the period for which a service is provided are accounted for as deferred revenue on the balance sheet.

~~Cost of Revenues.~~ The Company records direct material and component costs, direct labor and associated benefits, and manufacturing overhead costs such as supervision, manufacturing equipment depreciation, rent, and utility costs, which are included in inventory prior to a sale, as cost of revenues. The Company further includes shipping and handling fees billed to customers as revenues and shipping and handling costs as cost of revenues.

~~Share-Based Compensation.~~ We measure and recognize compensation expense for all share-based payments based on estimated fair value. Share-based compensation expense is recognized based on the fair value on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards. The fair value of our restricted stock and performance stock units is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. The determination of the amount of share-based compensation expense for our performance stock units requires the use of certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of share-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements of operations. At each reported period, we reassess the probability of the achievement of corporate performance goals to estimate the amount of shares to be released. Any increase or decrease in share-based compensation expense resulting from an adjustment in the estimated shares to be released is treated as a cumulative catch-up in the period of adjustment. If any of the assumptions or estimates used change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially from what we have recorded in the current period.

~~Comparison of Results of Operations for Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021~~

~~Revenues.~~ For the year ended December 31, 2022, our revenues increased 144% to $22.0 million compared to $9.0 million for 2021. Revenues to federal customers increased by $4.5 million. In addition, we were awarded a number of contracts from federal agencies in late September and early October of 2022 totaling more than $46.0 million, which we intend to deliver over the next 12 months. Some of these units shipped in the quarter ended December 31, 2022, with the balance scheduled for delivery in 2023. We recorded energy storage revenues of $5.2 million as a result of our acquisition of All Cell which closed on March 4, 2022. Our revenue to state agencies increased by $0.8 million compared to the prior year, and we continue to have a strong concentration of revenues to the State of California and state of New York, which represent 29% and 18% of total revenues, respectively. Revenues derived from non-government entities increased to 37% of our total revenues in 2022 representing a partial return to pre-COVID levels, compared to 13% of our total revenues in 2021. We continue to invest in sales and marketing employees, resources and programs to raise awareness of the benefits and value of our products, which is reflected in the strong year over year sales growth in the quarter. The receipt of orders may continue to be uneven due to the timing of customer approvals or budget cycles, however we believe that as EV adoption increases in concert with increased availability of infrastructure funding, our business will be less impacted by specific variations in order timing.

~~Gross Loss.~~ For the year ended December 31, 2022, our gross loss was $1.7 million, or 8% of sales, compared to $1.0 million, or 11% of sales in the prior year. As a percentage of sales, the margin improved by three percentage points, primarily due to the increase in production levels in the current quarter compared to 2021, which resulted in favorable fixed overhead absorption. In addition, our labor efficiency improved during the quarter as a result of a steady flow of units through the factory. This was partially offset by an increase of $0.8 million for non-cash intangible amortization and an increase in material costs for steel, batteries and other components, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other inflationary pressures. Shipping costs have increased globally as well as gas and transportation prices which have increased our delivery costs. Toward the end of the year, we started to see some reduction in gas prices and our products’ components. We expect our cost per unit to improve as we expect to see material costs start to decrease and as our volumes increase. We also acquired a battery manufacturer, All Cell in March 2022, which should significantly reduce the cost of the batteries in our units. In addition, as we expect the Company to grow in 2023 and beyond, we expect our fixed overhead absorption to continue to improve.

~~Operating Expenses.~~ Total operating expenses were $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $5.6 million in the prior year, primarily due to a $5.5 million change in fair value of contingent consideration related to the All Cell acquisition. Excluding such cost, the operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 increased by $6.9 million compared to the prior year, driven by $3.4 million in expenses attributable to the newly acquired All Cell business, $2.3 million increase in employee non-cash compensation, including a $1.6 million increase in employee non-cash stock-based compensation, $0.6 million increase for legal and accounting services, primarily attributable to the acquisition, and $0.5 million increase for sales and marketing costs to generate increased sales levels. As a percentage of revenue, operating expenses excluding the change in fair value of contingent consideration decreased by 6 percentage points.

At December 31, 2022, we had cash of $1.7 million, compared to cash of $21.9 million at December 31, 2021. We have historically met our cash needs through a combination of debt and equity financings. Our cash requirements are generally for operating activities.

~~Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the statements of cash flows, are summarized in the table below:~~

For the year ended December 31, 2022, our cash used in operating activities was $18.1 million compared to $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net loss of $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 was increased by $9.1 million of non-cash expense items that included a change in fair value of contingent consideration of $5.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $1.1 million, common stock issued for services for director compensation of $0.4 million and employee stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million. Further, cash used in operations included a $0.6 million increase in accounts receivable, $0.8 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, primarily related to the prepayment of battery cells, and $8.2 million increase in inventory (i) to secure battery cells required for battery manufacturing in case of potential future supply chain challenges and (ii) due to higher work in process inventory of nearly complete EV ARC^TM ~~units as well as finished EV ARC~~^TM units awaiting final delivery at December 31, 2022. The increases in prepayments and inventory are not expected to continue in future quarters, but rather should remain flat or reduce to lower levels over the next 12 months. Cash provided by operations included a $1.3 million increase in accounts payable primarily for inventory and $0.9 million increase in accrued expenses.

Our operating activities resulted in cash used in operations of $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Net loss of $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 was increased by $1.3 million of non-cash expense items that included depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million, common stock issued for services for director compensation of $0.7 million and non-cash compensation expense related to the grant of stock options of $0.4 million primarily due to an increase in the stock price in the year ended December 31, 2021. Further, cash used in operations included an increase in accounts receivable of $2.0 million due to a strong fourth quarter revenue in 2021 compared to 2020 and $0.5 million increase in inventory due to inventory purchases to support increased sales activity. Cash provided by operations included a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $0.1 million, an increase in accounts payable of $0.8 million due to inventory purchases, $0.3 million increase in accrued expenses primarily due to compensation related accruals at the end of the year and $0.1 million for an increase in deferred revenue.

Cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2022 included $0.8 million cash payment for working capital payment related to the acquisition of All Cell, $0.9 million to purchase equipment and $0.1 million in patent costs. The year ended December 31, 2021 included $0.1 million to fund patent related costs and $0.5 million to purchase equipment, primarily for production and transportation.

In 2022, cash generated by our financing activities included $0.5 million from the exercise of warrants, $0.5 million used to cover payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation and $0.3 million payment of equity offering costs related to the committed equity line agreement entered into with B. Riley. In 2021, cash generated by our financing activities included $2.9 million from the exercise of warrants, offset by $0.6 million used to cover payroll taxes for cashless stock option exercises.

Current assets decreased to $19.9 million at December 31, 2022 from $27.6 million at December 31, 2021, primarily due to a $20.3 million decrease in cash, offset by a $10.6 million increase in inventory and $1.4 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Current liabilities increased to $13.2 million at December 31, 2022 from $3.0 million at December 31, 2021, primarily due to the recording of $6.8 million current portion of contingent consideration, a $1.3 million increase in accounts payable for purchases of inventory to support the increased sales forecast, $1.0 million increase in current deferred revenue and a $1.0 million increase in accrued expenses. As a result, our working capital decreased to $6.8 million at December 31, 2022 compared to $24.6 million at December 31, 2021.

The Company has been focused on marketing and sales efforts to increase our revenues. Revenues increased by 45% from 2020 to 2021 and 144% from 2021 to 2022, demonstrating that this investment has been successful. While the Company has still not earned a gross profit on its sale of products, gross profit has improved even during an inflationary period, and as revenues increase, we expect to see our fixed overhead costs spread over more units, which will reduce the cost per unit. Management has made several design changes and process improvements in our manufacturing operations in 2021 and 2022 which has helped to increase labor efficiency and reduce costs. At the same time, supply chain issues related to the COVID-19 virus have caused an increase in certain of our material costs, most notably in steel purchases. However, we believe that we will continue to improve our gross profit as our revenues grow. Management believes that with anticipated increased production volumes, efficiencies will continue to improve, and the fixed overhead cost per unit will decrease. In addition, our suppliers believe that costs that have increased over the past year should start to decrease beginning in 2023. This should result in increasing gross profits on the EV ARC ™ and Solar Tree® products in the future.

The Company may be required to raise capital until it achieves positive cash flow from its business, which is predicated on increasing sales volumes and the continuation of production cost reduction measures. In September 2022, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with B. Riley under which the Company has the right to sell up to $30.0 million shares of its common stock over a period of 24 months (see note 10 for further information.) In addition, we could pursue other equity or debt financings. Furthermore, the Company has warrants to purchase 440,204 shares of our Common Stock outstanding at December 31, 2022, which could potentially generate an additional $2.8 million of proceeds over the next 1.3 years, depending on the market value of our stock and the warrant holders’ ability to exercise them. The proceeds from these offerings are expected to provide working capital to fund business operations and the development of new products. Management cannot currently predict when or if it will achieve positive cash flow.

On March 4, 2022, the Company completed an acquisition of the assets of All Cell Technologies, LLC (“All Cell”), a leader in energy storage solutions. We believe this strategic acquisition will increase and diversify our revenue, gross profitability, manufacturing capabilities, intellectual portfolio and customer base. The Company purchased substantially all of the assets and business of All Cell for 1,055,000 shares of Beam Common Stock (“Closing Consideration”) (on the closing date, based on the closing price of the Beam Common Stock of $13.61, such shares had a value of approximately $14.4 million) plus an additional $0.8 million in cash for the net working capital of primarily inventory held by All Cell at closing. In addition to the cash paid for the working capital of $0.8 million, the Purchase Agreement requires a capital investment of not less than $1.5 million of equipment to be used for the business. All Cell is eligible to earn an additional number of shares of Beam Common Stock if Beam’s new energy storage business meets certain revenue milestones (the “Earnout Consideration”). The Earnout Consideration is: (i) two times the amount of energy storage products revenue and contracted backlog that is greater than $7.5 million for 2022, and (ii) two times the amount of energy storage products 2023 revenue only which exceeds the greater of either $13.5 million or 135% of the 2022 cumulative revenue, capped at $20.0 million. Revenues exceeding $20.0 million in 2023 will not be eligible for the Earnout Consideration. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that the Company will issue to All Cell for the Closing Consideration and Earnout Consideration will not exceed 1.8 million shares.

Management believes that evolution in the operations of the Company may allow it to execute on its strategic plan and enable it to experience profitable growth in the future. This evolution is anticipated to include the following continual steps: addition of sales personnel and independent sales channels, continued management of overhead costs, increased overhead absorption resulting from volume growth, process improvements and vendor negotiations leading to cost reductions, increased public awareness of the Company and its products, and the continued acceleration of average sales cycle opportunities. Management believes that these steps, if successful, may enable the Company to generate sufficient revenue to continue operations. There is no assurance, however, as to if or when the Company will be able to achieve those operating objectives.

On April 18, 2019, the Company closed an underwritten public offering with Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”), as representative for the several underwriters (the “Underwriters”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Underwriters an aggregate of 2,000,000 units with each unit consisting of one (1) share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), and a warrant to purchase one (1) share of Common Stock at an exercise price equal to $6.30 per share (the “Warrants”). In addition, the Company granted the Underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to 300,000 additional shares of Common Stock, or Warrants, or any combination thereof, at the public offering price to cover over-allotments, if any. The Common Stock and the Warrants were offered and sold to the public (the “Offering”) pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-226040), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on July 2, 2018, as amended, which became effective on April 15, 2019, and a related registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The offering price to the public was $6.00 per unit and the Underwriters purchased 2,000,000 units. In addition, the Underwriters purchased 300,000 Warrants for $3,000 upon the exercise of the Underwriters’ over-allotment option. The Company received gross proceeds of approximately $12,003,000, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.

Concurrent with the offering, the Company effected a one-for-fifty reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”) and reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock from 490,000,000 to 9,800,000. No fractional shares were issued as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. Fractional shares were rounded up or down to the nearest whole share, after aggregating all fractional shares held by a stockholder, resulting in the issuance of 187 round-up shares. Any stockholder holding less than 24 shares of Common Stock on a pre-reverse stock basis were paid in cash for such fractional share of Common Stock, which totaled $171.

On May 15, 2019, the Company closed the Underwriters Second Over-Allotment partial exercise option to purchase 200,000 shares of Common Stock at $5.99 per share (the "Second Over-Allotment Exercise") for additional gross proceeds of $1.198 million, prior to deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by the Company, pursuant to and in compliance with the terms and conditions of the previously announced April 16, 2019 Underwriting Agreement and Offering.

The Company filed a “shelf” registration statement on Form S-3 and an accompanying prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2020. On July 7, 2020, the Company closed an underwritten public offering issuing 1,393,900 shares, with a public offering price of $8.25 per share, generating approximately $10.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.

On November 27, 2020, the Company closed a second underwritten public offering issuing 250,000 shares, with a public offering price of $30.00 per share, generating approximately $6.9 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.

In September 2022, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with B. Riley Principal Capital II, LLC (“B. Riley”) under which the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell up to $30.0 million shares or a maximum of 2.0 million shares of its common stock over a period of 24 months in its sole discretion.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources, that are material to investors.

~~The financial statements required by this item begin on page F-1 with the index to financial statements followed by the financial statements.~~

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

At the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, the disclosure controls and procedures of our Company were not effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports was recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis due to material weakness in internal controls as identified below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Since the type of material weakness identified below have a pervasive effect across the inventory transaction cycle, management has determined that these circumstances constitute material weakness that therefore affects disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

During the period covered by this filing, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. Based upon the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, we do not yet have sufficient internal controls over financial reporting and procedures to ensure that all the information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports was recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.

~~We identified the following material weakness which existed as of December 31, 2022:~~

Since these controls have a pervasive effect across the inventory transaction cycle, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness, based on the criteria established in the “Internal Integrated Framework” issued by COSO in 2013 and as a result, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022.

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 has not been audited by our independent registered public accounting firm by virtue of our exemption from such requirement as a smaller reporting company.

During the three months ended September 30, 2022, we significantly improved our manual inventory processes related to ordering, counting, warehousing, valuing and transacting our inventory at our San Diego facility. We selected an ERP System and began planning the implementation scheduled for January through June 2023. At the same time, we continue to implement process improvements in our Chicago facility which will provide for better controls in manufacturing.

During the quarters ended June 30, September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2022, the Company implemented a control to review third-party valuation reports, which include formalized review procedures and enhanced communications with third-party experts. We believe that these controls have effectively addressed the material weakness identified in the quarter ended March 31, 2022 and that this no longer represents a material weakness.

The ~~information required~~following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our current executive officers and directors (ages as of April 25, 2024):

Desmond Wheatley has served as our president, chief operating officer, and secretary since September 2010. Mr. Wheatley was appointed chief executive officer and director in August 2011, and he became the chair of our board of directors in December 2016. He is an inventor of the EV ARC™, BeamTrak™, UAV ARC™ and EV Standard™. Mr. Wheatley has two decades of senior international management experience in technology systems integration, energy management, communications and renewable energy. Prior to joining Beam Global, Mr. Wheatley was a founding partner in the international consulting practice Crichton Hill LLC in 2009 and he was chief executive officer of iAxis FZ LLC, a Dubai based alternative energy and technology systems integration company from 2007 to 2009. From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Wheatley held a variety of senior management positions at San Diego-based Kratos Defense and Security Solutions, formally known as Wireless Facilities, with the last five years as president of ENS (Enterprise Network Solutions, a division of Wireless Facilities Inc (NASDAQ: WFII now KTOS)), then the largest independent security and energy management systems integrator in the United States. Prior to forming ENS in 2002, Mr. Wheatley held senior management positions in the cellular and broadband wireless industries, deploying infrastructure and lobbying in Washington DC on behalf of major wireless service providers. Mr. Wheatley’s teams led turnkey deployments of thousands of cellular sites and designed and deployed broadband wireless networks in many MTAs across the United States. Mr. Wheatley has founded, funded, and operated four profitable start-up companies and was previously engaged in merger and acquisition activities. Mr. Wheatley evaluated acquisition opportunities, conducted due diligence and raised commitments of $500 million in debt and equity.

Lisa Potok has served as our chief financial officer since December 2023. Ms. Potok served as chief financial officer, treasurer, and secretary of Nice North America LLC from 2022 to 2023. Prior to that, Ms. Potok held positions as the vice president of global finance, investor relations and M&A for Newegg Inc. (NASDAQ: NEGG) during 2021, vice president of global finance at Club Demonstration Services, (NASDAQ: ADV) from 2019 to 2020, a product demonstration company, and vice president of finance/divisional chief financial officer at FTD, Inc.’s Provide Commerce division (NASDAQ: FTD) from 2016 to 2019 . Ms. Potok is a CPA and holds a Bachelor of Arts in Accounting from Hillsdale College, and a Master of Business Administration from The Paul Merage School of Business at the University of California.

Sandra Peterson has served as our Vice President of Sales and Marketing since January 2020. From February 2015 to December 2019, Ms. Peterson led the AI and go-to-market strategy at Absolutdata, a leading AI and analytics company. Prior to that, she held leadership roles at both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 companies including Apple, Nvidia, Adobe and Palm. Sandra holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Management Science from the University of California at San Diego, and a Master’s degree in International Business from St. Mary’s College of Moraga.

Mark Myers has served as our Chief Operating Officer since January 2024. Prior to joining Beam Global, Mr. Myers was the Senior Director of Operations of Bilstein of America, a wholly owned subsidiary of thyssenkrupp (traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange: TKA) from 2021 to 2024, leading manufacturing, supply chain, distribution, and quality for high-quality aftermarket shock absorbers and suspension systems. Prior to that, he was the Director of Manufacturing Operations for General Atomics Electromagnetic Systems from 2010 to 2021, a Management Consultant at McKinsey & Co. from 2007 to 2010 and served as a Nuclear Navy Officer for the United States Navy from 1998 - 2006. Mr. Myers holds a Master of Science in Executive Leadership from the University of San Diego, Master of Science in Engineering Management from Old Dominion University and a Bachelor of Science in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering from the Webb Institute.

Anthony Posawatz has served as a director of the Company since February 2016. He currently serves on our lead director and is a member of Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Equity Oversight Committees. Mr. Posawatz has been an automotive industry professional for over 40 years and over 30 years in an executive capacity. He currently serves as CEO of Fermata Energy and of his consulting advisory firm, Invictus iCAR LLC. He has previously served as the president, chief executive officer, and a director of Fisker Automotive from August 2012 to August 2013. Mr. Posawatz worked for General Motors (“GM”) for more than 30 years. As GM’s vehicle line director for the Chevrolet Volt and key leader of global electric vehicle development, he was responsible for bringing the Chevrolet Volt from concept to production launch in 2010. He currently serves on the boards of Zapp EV (NASDAQ: ZAPP), Nanoramic Laboratories and Fermata Energy.

Mr. Posawatz is a licensed professional engineer (P. E.) in Michigan and was both a General Motors Undergraduate Scholar at Wayne State University where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering, and a Graduate Fellow at Dartmouth College, Tuck School of Business where he earned a Master of Business Administration degree.

Peter Davidson has served as a director of the Company since September 2016. He currently serves on our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Equity Oversight Committees. Since 2019, Mr. Davidson has been the chief executive officer and a director of Aligned Climate Capital LLC, an investment advisory firm focused exclusively on investments in clean energy, efficient transportation, green real estate and sustainable natural resources. From 2016 to 2019, he was the chief executive officer for Aligned Intermediary, an investment advisory group created to help long-term investors increase the flow of capital into capital infrastructure projects and clean energy companies. In May 2013, Mr. Davidson was appointed by President Obama to serve as the executive director of the Loan Program Office (“LPO”) at the United States Department of Energy, a position he held until June 2015. At the LPO, Mr. Davidson oversaw the program’s more than $30 billion portfolio of loans and loan guarantees, making it the largest project finance organization in the United States government. Mr. Davidson was responsible for ensuring that the LPO carried out its mission to accelerate the deployment of innovative clean energy projects and domestic advanced vehicle manufacturing. Prior to leading the LPO, Mr. Davidson was the senior advisor for energy and economic development at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (from 2012 to 2013) and was the executive director of New York State’s economic development agency, the Empire State Development Corporation (from 2009 to 2011). From 1989 to 2014, Mr. Davidson was an entrepreneur who founded and managed several separate companies in television and radio broadcasting, outdoor advertising, and traditional and digital marketing services, with a focus on the Hispanic market. From 1986 to 1989, he was an executive in the investment banking division of Morgan Stanley & Co. Since 2001, Mr. Davidson has also been the chairman of the JM Kaplan Fund, a New York City based philanthropic organization. Under his leadership, grant making has focused on reducing New York City’s carbon footprint, supporting immigrant integration in the U.S. and archeological conservation world-wide. Mr. Davidson is currently a director of First Eagle Investment Management. Mr. Davidson received his Master of Business Administration degree from Harvard University in 1986 and his Bachelor of Arts degree from Stanford University in 1981.

Judy Krandel has served as director of the Company since December 2023. She currently serves on our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Equity Oversight Committees. Mrs. Krandel currently serves as the CFO of Nephros, Inc (NASDAQ: NEPH). from November 2023. Mrs. Krandel served as the Chief Financial Officer of Recruiter.com Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCRT) from June 2020 to September 2023. From November 2016 until December 2019, she served as Chief Financial Officer, and then Senior Business Development Consultant for PeerStream, Inc. From March 2012 until November 2016, Mrs. Krandel was the Portfolio Manager for Juniper Investment Company, a small-cap hedge fund. Mrs. Krandel spent the earlier part of her career as an equity analyst and portfolio manager focusing on small-cap public equities. In the past, she had served on the board of directors of Lincoln First Bancorp, Snap Interactive (NASDAQ: PALT) and Cynergistek in the digital media and healthcare cybersecurity industries. She is a graduate of the Wharton School of Business of the University of Pennsylvania with a degree in finance and the Booth School of Business of the University of Chicago with an MBA in finance and accounting.

George Syllantavos has served as director of the Company since December 2023. He currently serves on our Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Governance and Equity Oversight Committees. My Syllantavos has served as the Founder, Co-CEO and CFO of Stellar V Capital Inc. since September 2022. Mr. Syllantavos is a member of the Board of Directors, member and chairman of the Audit Committee, member of the Compensation Committee, and member of the Nominating Committee of Cepton Inc. (NASDAQ: CPTN) since February 2022, and Non-Executive Director of SevenSeas Investment Fund since March 2019, Founder and Managing Director of Nautilus Energy Management since February 2013. Previously, Mr. Syllantavos was the Founder, co-CEO and CFO of Growth Capital Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: GCAC) from May 2020 to February 2022, has served as a board member and the Chair of the audit committee of ITHAX Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: ITHX) February 2021 to July 2022 and has served as a board member of Phunware Inc. (NASDAQ: PHUN) from December 2018 to December 2021. Mr. Syllantavos holds a bachelor's degree in Industrial Engineering from Roosevelt University in Chicago, IL and a Masters of Business Administration in Operations Management, International Finance and Transportation Management from the Kellogg Graduate School at Northwestern University, in Evanston, IL.

Each executive officer serves at the discretion of our Board of Directors and holds office until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors, considered as a group, provide a broad mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. We believe that our Board is composed of a group of leaders in their respective fields. All of the current directors have executive experience at public companies, as well as experience serving on other companies’ boards, which provides an understanding of different business processes, challenges and strategies facing other companies. Further, our directors also have other experience that makes them valuable members and provides insight into issues relevant to the Company.

The following highlights the specific experience, qualification, attributes and skills of our individual Board members, or nominees for the Board, that have led our Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board to conclude that these individuals are qualified to serve on our Board:

Mr. Wheatley provides leadership and industry experience to the Board of Directors gained by being our chief executive officer since August 2011 and president since September 2010. Mr. Wheatley has held numerous executive positions in international organizations including five years as president of a publicly traded technology and energy management company. Mr. Wheatley was the founding member of an international consulting company with expertise in the renewable and energy sectors. He has held various executive level positions in multiple infrastructure deployment companies and has been involved in energy management and renewables since 2002. Mr. Wheatley also provides the Board of Directors with significant corporate finance experience.

Mr. Posawatz provides leadership and industry experience to the Board of Directors gained by being the chief executive officer of several companies and leading the development of several electric vehicle products including GM’s Chevrolet Volt.

Mr. Davidson provides leadership and industry experience to the Board of Directors gained by holding executive level positions at multiple companies and by serving as executive director of the Loan Program Office of the United States Department of Energy and the Empire State Development Corporation. Mr. Davidson is also a non-resident fellow at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy and the chairman of the JM Kaplan Fund, a New York City based philanthropic organization which provide grants to support reducing New York City’s carbon footprint.

Mrs. Krandel provides leadership and industry experience to the Board of Directors gained by executive level and board of director positions at other NASDAQ companies. Mrs. Krandel’s experience in investment management provides the company with additional expertise in capital markets and investor relations.

Mr. Syllantavos provides leadership and industry experience to the Board of Directors gained by serving as a chief executive officer and chief financial officer of a number of public and private companies in the fields of transportation, logistics, infrastructure and technology. Mr. Syllantavos also brings on experience in transactions and mergers and acquisitions through his service in such executive positions and also contributes his corporate governance experience pursuant to his service on the Board of a number of public companies.

Our Board of Directors currently consists of five directors. Four of our directors are “independent” as defined in Rule 4200 of FINRA’s listing standards and the NASDAQ Capital Market criteria. In accordance with the standards of the NASDAQ Capital Market, these directors are considered “independent” because they are not employees or executive officers of the Company and have not been paid more than $120,000 of compensation by the Company, other than for their service as members of our Board of Directors, in any consecutive 12-month period during the past three years. Furthermore, they have no family members being paid compensation by the Company, and they do not serve as directors or officers of any companies that conduct business with the Company as outside vendors or service providers. We plan to appoint additional independent directors to our board of directors in the future.

Our Board of Directors focuses on the most significant risks facing us and our general risk management strategy, and also ensuring that risks undertaken by us are consistent with the Board’s appetite for risk. While the Board oversees our company’s risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing us and that our Board leadership structure supports this approach.

Our Board of Directors currently has an audit committee, a compensation committee, a nominating and governance committee and an equity oversight committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board of Directors are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board of Directors.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors currently consists of three independent directors of which at least one, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as a qualified financial expert as defined in Item 10407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. Judy Krandel is the Chairman of the Audit Committee and financial expert, and George Syllantavos and Peter Davidson are the other members of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee's duties are to recommend to our Board of Directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit our consolidated financial statements and to review our accounting and auditing principles. The Audit Committee reviews the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by any internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The Audit Committee will at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of consolidated financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles. The charter of the Audit Committee is available on our website at www.beamforall.com.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee establishes our executive compensation policy, determines the salary and bonuses of our executive officers and recommends to the Board stock option grants for our executive officers. George Syllantavos is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and Anthony Posawatz and Judy Krandel and are the other directors who are members of the Compensation Committee. Each of the members are independent under NASDAQ’s independence standards for compensation committee members. Our chief executive officer often makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee and the Board concerning the compensation of other executive officers. The Compensation Committee seeks input on certain compensation policies from the chief executive officer. The charter of the Compensation Committee is available on our website at www.beamforall.com.

Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for matters relating to the corporate governance of our Company and the nomination of members of the Board and committees thereof. Peter Davidson is the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee, and Anthony Posawatz is the other director member of the Committee. Each of the members are independent under NASDAQ’s independence standards. The charter of the Nominating and Governance Committee is available on our website at www.beamforall.com.

Equity Oversight Committee. The Equity Oversight Committee is responsible for matters related to the offering of securities of the Company. Anthony Posawatz, George Syllantavos, Peter Davidson, and Judy Krandel are members of the Equity Oversight Committee.

Our nominating and governance committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating director nominees. In its evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and governance committee will consider the current size and composition of our Board of Directors and the needs of our Board of Directors and the respective committees of our Board of Directors. Some of the qualifications that our nominating and governance committee considers include, without limitation: issues of character, integrity, and judgment; independence; diversity, including diversity of experience; experience in corporate management, operations, finance, business development, and mergers and acquisitions; experience relevant to the Company’s industry; experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly held company; length of service; and any other relevant qualifications, attributes, or skills. Nominees also must have the ability to offer advice and guidance to our Chief Executive Officer based on past experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and should be leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are affiliated. Director candidates must have sufficient time available in the judgment of our nominating and governance committee to perform all Board of Directors responsibilities and responsibilities of those committees on which they serve.

Members of our Board of Directors are expected to prepare for, attend, and participate in all Board of Directors and applicable committee meetings. Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although our nominating and governance committee may also consider such other factors as it may deem, from time to time, are in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The policy of our nominating and governance committee is to consider properly submitted stockholder recommendations for candidates for membership on the Board. In evaluating such recommendations, the nominating and governance committee will address the membership criteria set forth above. After completing its review and evaluation of director candidates, our nominating and governance committee recommends to our full Board of Directors the director nominees for selection.

Although our Board of Directors does not maintain a specific policy with respect to board diversity, our Board of Directors believes that it should be a diverse body, and our nominating and governance committee considers a broad range of backgrounds and experiences. In making determinations regarding nominations of directors, our nominating and governance committee may take into account the benefits of diverse viewpoints. Our nominating and governance committee also considers these and other factors as it oversees the annual Board of Directors and committee evaluations.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to all of our employees, officers, and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive and senior financial officers. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available in the Investors Relations section of our website at beamforall.com under “Governance Documents.”

The Board has not adopted a specific policy on whether the same person should serve as both the Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board or, if the roles are separate, whether the chair should be selected from the non-employee directors or should be an employee. The Board believes it is appropriate to retain the discretion and flexibility to make these determinations from time to time as needed to provide appropriate leadership for the Company. At this time, the Board believes that a combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, along with Board committees that are chaired by independent directors is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time. The combined role fosters open communication between the Board and management team, provides both groups with unified leadership and promotes efficient development and execution of the Company’s strategic plan. The board appointed Anthony Posawatz as its lead independent director on April 16, 2021.

The independent directors meet as frequently as they desire, but at least once per year, in an executive session.

In addition to the responsibilities performed by our audit committee, the Board of Directors plays an active role in overseeing management of the Company’s risks. The Board of Directors focuses on the most significant operational risks facing our Company related to our business, assets, and liabilities, as well as our key financial risks, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other market-related risk. Our Board seeks to ensure that risks undertaken by the Company are consistent with an overall risk profile that is appropriate for the Company and the achievement of its business objectives and strategies. The Board of Directors recognizes that risk management and oversight comprise a dynamic and continuous process and therefore reviews the Company’s risk model and process periodically. The Board of Directors performs these tasks both in collaboration with and independently of the audit committee and Company management.

The following table summarizes compensation paid to our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2023. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. During the year ended December 31, 2023, Mr. Wheatley, our current President and Chief Executive Officer, was an employee. Compensation for Mr. Wheatley is discussed in “Executive Compensation.”

Each non-employee director received a quarterly cash retainer of $15,000 for serving on our Board of Directors. The retainer is payable in arrears, subject to such director’s continued service on the last day of the preceding quarter and prorated as necessary to reflect service commencement or termination during the quarter. In addition, each non-employee director receives an additional amount based on the committee position held per quarter as follows: (i) $10,000 lead director (ii) $5,000 audit chair (iii) $3,750 compensation chair and (iv) $2,500 nominating and governance chair.

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board or committee meetings.

Each non-employee director received a quarterly cash retainer for serving on our Board of Directors. The retainer is payable in arrears, subject to such director’s continued service on the last day of the preceding quarter and prorated as necessary to reflect service commencement or termination during the quarter.

All directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board or committee meetings.

On January 2 of each year, each non-employee director will be ~~incorporated herein~~granted a certain number of shares of restricted common stock equal to $125,000 divided by ~~reference~~the average daily closing price of our common stock for the preceding month and rounded up to ~~our definitive proxy statement,~~the nearest 100. The restricted common stock vests quarterly in four (4) equal installments.

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors, certain officers, and ten percent (10%) stockholders to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based upon a review of filings with the SEC and/or written representations that no other reports were required, we believe, except as set forth below, that all reports for the Company’s officers and directors that were required to be filed ~~within 120 days~~under Section 16 of ~~our fiscal year end or will be included~~the Exchange Act were timely filed in ~~an amendment to this Form 10-K.~~2023:

The ~~information required by Item 11 will be incorporated herein by reference~~following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation for our executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table (“Named Executive Officers”).

Our compensation committee is responsible for the executive compensation programs for our executive officers and reports to the Board of Directors on its discussions, decisions and other actions. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to our ~~definitive proxy statement,~~compensation committee, attends committee meetings, and is involved in the determination of compensation for the respective executive officers that report to ~~be filed within 120 days~~him, except that our Chief Executive Officer does not make recommendations as to his own compensation. Additionally, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to our compensation committee regarding short- and long-term compensation for all executive officers (other than himself) based on our results, an individual executive officer’s contribution toward these results, and performance toward individual goal achievement. Our compensation committee then reviews the recommendations and other data and makes decisions as to total compensation for each executive officer other than the Chief Executive Officer, as well as each individual compensation component. Our compensation committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding compensation for our Chief Executive Officer. The independent members of the Board of Directors make the final decisions regarding executive compensation for our Chief Executive Officer.

The compensation committee is authorized to retain the services of one or more executive compensation advisors, as it sees fit, in connection with the establishment of our ~~fiscal year end, or~~compensation programs and related policies.

Our compensation philosophy is based on the premise of attracting, retaining, and motivating exceptional leaders, setting high goals, working toward the common objectives of meeting the expectations of customers and stockholders, and rewarding outstanding performance. Following this philosophy, we consider all relevant factors in determining executive compensation, including the competition for talent, our desire to link pay with performance, the use of equity to align executive interests with those of our stockholders, individual contributions, teamwork, and each executive’s total compensation package.

The compensation received by our Named Executive Officers is based primarily on their experience and knowledge as well as their responsibilities and individual contributions to the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee conducted a compensation benchmarking study in 2022 with an independent, credible consultant to provide guidance on compensation for members of the executive team. This study provided data and recommendations for a competitive pay structure.

The primary purpose of the compensation and benefits we consider is to attract, retain, and motivate highly talented individuals who will engage in the behavior necessary to enable us to succeed in our mission, while upholding our values in a highly competitive marketplace. Different elements are designed to engender different behaviors, and the actual incentive amounts which may be ~~included in an amendment~~awarded to ~~this Form 10-K.~~each Named Executive Officer are subject to the annual review of our compensation committee who will make recommendations regarding compensation to our Board of Directors. The following is a brief description of the key elements of our planned executive compensation structure.

~~The information required by Item 12 will be incorporated herein by reference~~Benchmarking

In 2022, we utilized a third-party to conduct a compensation benchmarking study to provide guidance in the development of our executive compensation. When making compensation decisions, our Board of Directors may compare each element of compensation paid to our ~~definitive proxy statement,~~Named Executive Officers against a report showing comparable compensation metrics from a group that includes both publicly traded and privately held companies. Our Board believes that while such peer group benchmarks are a point of reference for measurement, they are not necessarily the only factor in setting executive compensation. Each executive officer’s compensation relative to ~~be filed within 120 days~~the benchmark varies based on the scope of responsibility and time in the position. Due to the size of our ~~fiscal year end, or~~company, it is difficult to collect information pertaining to a formal peer group for this purpose. We used data across a broader range of companies and will ~~be included in an amendment to this Form 10-K.~~tighten our peer group over time.

The ~~information required by Item 13 will be incorporated herein by~~Elements of Our Compensation Program

Executive officer base salaries are based on job responsibilities and individual contribution. Our Board of Directors reviews the base salaries of our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, considering factors such as corporate progress toward achieving objectives (without reference to any specific performance-related targets) and individual performance experience and expertise. Additional factors reviewed by our ~~definitive proxy statement,~~Board of Directors in determining appropriate base salary levels and raises include subjective factors related to corporate and individual performance.

A bonus plan was established for the services of our named executive officers for 2023 and 2022. In 2023, the Bonus targets were set as a percentage of base pay of 100% for both the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Goals for 2023 included: (1) the growth in our revenue, (2) improved gross margin (3) international expansion acquisition that will benefit the Company, (4) capital raise, (5) filling key positions at the Company and other specific goals for these individuals. Goals for 2022 included (1) the growth in our revenue, (2) improved gross margin (3) acquisitions that will benefit the Company, (4) strong investor outreach, (5) filling key positions at the Company and other specific goals for these individuals. Payment for bonuses pertaining to 2023 are expected to be ~~filed within 120 days~~made in the second quarter of ~~our fiscal year end, or will be included~~2024. Payment for bonuses pertaining to 2022 was made in ~~an amendment to this Form 10-K.~~

The information required by Item 14 will be incorporated herein by reference to our definitive proxy statement, to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end, or will be included in an amendment to this Form 10-K.

In order to provide an incentive to attract and retain directors, officers, and other employees whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons in our development and financial success, on August 10, 2011, the Company adopted an equity incentive plan (the “2011 Plan”), pursuant to which 630,000 shares of our common stock are currently reserved for issuance as awards to employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. This 2011 Plan was ratified by our shareholders at the 2012 annual shareholders meeting. On June 9, 2021, the Company’s stockholders approved the Beam Global 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) under which 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved to be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or other awards granted under such plan in addition to the 630,000 shares previously reserved under the Beam Global 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.

The Company offers paid vacation and sick leave pay, in addition to a full range of benefits, including health care, dental, vision, life insurance and long-term disability. The Company also offers a 401(k) Plan for savings and includes a company match up to 3% of pay for the Company’s employees. We may adopt additional plans and confer other fringe benefits for our executive officers in the future if our business grows sufficiently to enable us to afford them.

The following table sets forth all compensation awarded, earned or paid for services rendered in all capacities to the Company during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 to (i) each person who served as the Company’s chief executive officer during fiscal 2023, (ii) the two most highly compensated officers other than the chief executive officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of fiscal 2023 and whose total compensation for such year exceeded $100,000, and (iii) up to two additional individuals for whom disclosures would have been provided in this table but for the fact that such persons were not serving as executive officers as of the end of 2023 (sometimes referred to collectively as the “Named Executive Officers”).

~~The financial statements required by this item are submitted in a separate section beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.~~

Desmond Wheatley. On February 9, 2021, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Desmond Wheatley, the Company’s president and chief executive officer. The Employment Agreement amends and restates Mr. Wheatley’s prior employment agreement effective as of January 1, 2016, and as amended on July 24, 2018. The Employment Agreement is on substantially the same terms and conditions as Mr. Wheatley’s prior employment agreement and extends the term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2025. Pursuant to the Employment Agreement, on April 1, 2021, the Company granted Mr. Wheatley 2,806 shares of restricted common stock. Fifty percent of the shares of restricted common stock vest in three (3) equal quarterly installments at the end of each calendar quarter following the grant date. The remaining fifty percent of the restricted stock vest in eleven (11) equal amounts at the end of each calendar quarter following the grant date. In addition, on January 1, 2022, the Company granted Mr. Wheatley 7,436 shares of restricted common stock equal to $150,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on such date. Fifty percent of the shares of restricted stock vest in four (4) equal quarterly installments at the end of each calendar quarter following the grant date. The remaining fifty percent of the restricted stock vests in twelve (12) equal amounts at the end of each calendar quarter following the grant date.

On November 10, 2022, the Board approved a stock grant under the Company’s 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, consisting of (i) a one-time grant of 142,500 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and (ii) a target number of 142,500 performance restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) to further incentivize and align Mr. Wheatley’s interest with the Company. For the RSUs, 50% vested upon the grant date, 25% will vest on February 1, 2024 and 25% will vest on February 1, 2025. The PRSUs are tied to three-year revenue and gross margin goals for the Company and will vest upon determination of performance by the Compensation Committee during January or February 2025. On December 15, 2022, the Board approved an increase in Mr. Wheatley’s annual cash compensation from $300,000 to $400,000 and his target bonus was increased from 25% to 100% of his base pay effective January 1, 2022.

Lisa Potok. Ms. Potok, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, and the Company agreed to an offer letter dated November 10, 2023, whereby the Company agreed to pay Ms. Potok an annual salary of $310,000 per year. Ms. Potok is eligible for an annual bonus up to 50% of her base salary subject to performance metrics established by the Company. Upon Ms. Potok’s appointment as its Chief Financial Officer, the Company also granted Ms. Potok an option to purchase up to 75,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $5.50 which vests over a four-year period.

Sandra Peterson. Ms. Peterson, the Company’s VP of Sales and Marketing, and the Company agreed to an offer letter dated December 16, 2019 whereby the Company agreed to pay Ms. Peterson an annual salary of $195,000 per year. Ms. Peterson is eligible for an annual bonus up to 20% of her base salary subject to performance metrics established by the Company as well as commission compensation equal to one half percent of the total, or portion of the total sales price actually received by the Company of any sale of our products after an annual target of $10,000,000 in revenue. Upon Ms. Peterson’s appointment, the Company also granted Ms. Peterson an option to purchase up to 49,104 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $4.57 which vest over a four-year period. The Company additionally granted Ms. Peterson 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on Jan 2, 2024, at an exercise price equal to $6.31 which vests over a four-year period.

* IndicatesMark Myers. Mr. Myers, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and the Company agreed to an offer letter dated December 19, 2023, whereby the Company agreed to pay Mr. Myers an annual salary of $250,000 per year. Mr. Myers is eligible for an annual bonus up to 50% of his base salary subject to performance metrics established by the Company. Upon Mr. Myers’s appointment as its Chief Operating Officer, the Company also granted Mr. Myers an option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $5.90 which vests over a ~~management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement~~

~~Index to Financial Statements~~Severance and Change in Control Agreements

Mr. Wheatley’s employment agreement with the Company provides for a payment in an amount equal to four times his annual compensation if he is terminated for reasons other than mutual agreement, his death, his breach or other cause, or upon his disability, as defined in the agreement.

On February 9, 2021, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan. The Plan provides severance benefits to eligible participants upon selected terminations of service in connection with a change of control of the Company. The Plan provides that upon termination of service of a participant by voluntary resignation of employment by the participant for good reason (which good reason occurred within the three (3) months prior to or twelve (12) months following the effective date of a change of control), or by the Company without cause, and the satisfaction of certain other requirements, the participant may receive certain (i) cash severance payments; (ii) bonus severance payments; (iii) health insurance premium payments; or (iv) acceleration of vesting of outstanding options or other equity awards as provided in the Plan. The Company’s chief financial officer, Lisa A. Potok, the Company’s chief operating officer, Mark Myers, and the Company’s VP of Sales and Marketing, Sandra Peterson, are participants under the Plan.

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock options held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2023.

~~Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~EQUITY BENEFIT AND STOCK PLANS

~~To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Beam Global~~Stock Incentive Plan

~~Opinion on~~On August 10, 2011, in order to provide an incentive to attract and retain directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons in our development and financial success, the ~~Financial Statements~~

~~We have audited~~Company adopted the ~~accompanying balance sheets~~2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2011 Plan"), pursuant to which 600,000 shares plus annual increases as provided in the 2011 Plan for a total of ~~Beam Global (the Company)~~30,000 shares as of December 31, ~~2022~~2019, were reserved for issuance as awards to employees, directors, consultants and ~~2021,~~other service providers. Under the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows, for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position2011 Plan, we were authorized to issue incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the ~~Company as~~Code and non-qualified stock options. The 2011 Plan is administered by our Board of ~~December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.~~

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of All Cell Technologies, LLC. (“All Cell”) for $16.4 million on March 4, 2022. The purchase price included contingent consideration of $1.25 million. The Company accounted for this transaction under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, including identified intangible assets of $10.4 million and resulting goodwill of $4.6 million. In order to value the identified intangible assets, which included developed technology, a tradename, and customer relationships, the Company used an income approach and valuation model. The model requires management to make significant assumptions, which include, where applicable, forecasted future cash flows, forecasted revenue growth rates, a royalty rate and discount rates.

We identified the valuation of acquired intangible assets and contingent consideration as of acquisition date as a critical audit matter as there was a high degree of auditor judgment and increased audit effort, including the use of valuation specialists, when performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence related to the reasonableness of significant estimates and assumptions utilized in management’s calculations.

~~Our audit procedures related to the significant estimates and assumptions over the valuation of acquired intangibles and contingent consideration included the following, among others:~~

We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasts of future cash flows and revenue growth rates by comparing historical results of All Cell, certain peer companies, and actual results to management’s forecasts.

We evaluated the reasonableness of managements’ projections of future revenue and estimated backlog used in measuring the fair value of the contingent consideration and intangible assets by comparing the significant assumptions used to market participant projection growth rates, current industry and economic trends and actual historical performance.

~~With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methodology, royalty rate and discount rates utilized by management by:~~

Beam Global (formerly Envision Solar International, Inc.) was incorporated in June 2006 as a limited liability company (“LLC”). Through a series of transactions and mergers, including a series of 2010 transactions where the then existing entity was acquired by an inactive publicly held company in a transaction treated as a recapitalization of the company, the resulting entity became Envision Solar International, Inc., a Nevada Corporation. On September 15, 2020, Envision Solar International, Inc. announced its rebranding and changed its corporate name to Beam Global (hereinafter the “Company”, “us”, “we”, “our” or “Beam”) and trading on Nasdaq: BEEM and BEEMW.

On March 4, 2022, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of All Cell Technologies, LLC (“All Cell”), an energy storage solutions and technologies company based in Broadview, Illinois. Refer to note 3, Business Combination for additional details.

Beam is a cleantech innovation company based in San Diego, California and Broadview, Illinois. We develop, design, engineer, manufacture and sell high-quality, renewably energized infrastructure products for electric vehicle (“EV”) charging, outdoor media and branding, and energy security and disaster preparedness as well as safe and compact, highly energy-dense battery solutions. Beam’s products enable vital and highly valuable energy production in locations where it is either too expensive or too impactful to connect to the utility grid, or where the requirements for electrical power are so important that grid failures, like blackouts, are intolerable. Beam’s energy storage products provide high energy density in a safe, compact and bespoke form-factors ideal for the rapidly increasing numbers of mobile and stationary equipment and products which require electrical energy without being connected to the electrical grid.

~~Beam’s products and proprietary technology solutions target four markets that are experiencing significant growth with annual global spending in the billions of dollars:~~

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying financial statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, valuation of inventory and standard cost allocations, depreciable lives of property and equipment, valuation of contingent consideration liability, valuation of intangible assets, estimates of loss contingencies, estimates of the valuation of lease liabilities and the related right of use assets, valuation of share-based costs, and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

~~Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and accounts receivable.~~

The Company maintains its cash in banks and financial institution deposits that at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts from inception through December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $~~2.2 million~~ ~~of the Company’s cash deposits were greater than the federally insured limits.~~

~~On March 10, 2023,~~ ~~Silicon Valley Bank~~ (“SVB”) was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which immediately appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver. All deposits and substantially all the asset of SVB were transferred to Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. (“SVBB”), which is no longer affiliated with SVB. The Company has full access to all of its deposited funds with SVBB and is in the process of establishing new accounts with a separate bank for its operations.

~~The Company continually assesses the financial strength of its customers. For the year ended December 31, 2022, one customer accounted for~~ 11~~% of total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2021, revenues from two customers accounted for~~ 33~~% and~~ 13~~% of total revenues each. At December 31, 2022, accounts receivable from three customers accounted for~~ 30%, 15~~% and~~ 11% of total accounts receivable each with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance. At December 31, 2021, accounts receivable from four customers accounted for 30%, 22%, 13~~% and~~ 10% of total accounts receivable with no other single customer accounting for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had a heavy concentration of sales to federal, state and local governments which represented 62~~% and~~ 87~~% of revenues, respectively.~~

~~For the purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. There were~~ no ~~cash equivalents at December 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021.~~

The fair value of assets and liabilities are based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We use a fair value hierarchy with three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, to measure fair value:

The Company’s financial instruments such as accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis. At December 31, 2022, the carrying amounts of these instruments approximated their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. Management reviews accounts receivable on a periodic basis to determine if any receivables may become uncollectible. Management’s evaluation includes several factors including the aging of the accounts receivable balances, a review of significant past due accounts, dialogue with the customer, the financial profile of a customer, our historical write-off experience, net of recoveries, and economic conditions. The Company includes any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in its overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. There were no ~~write-offs for bad debt in 2022 or 2021, and~~ no ~~allowances for doubtful accounts as of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.~~

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method of accounting. Inventory costs primarily relate to purchased raw materials and components used in the manufacturing of our products, work in process for products being manufactured, and finished goods. Included in these costs are direct labor and certain manufacturing overhead costs associated with normal capacity in the manufacturing process. The Company regularly reviews inventory components and quantities on hand and performs annual physical inventory counts.

~~Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets of~~ ~~3 to 7 years~~, except for leasehold improvements for which the depreciation is recorded over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, along with fixed assets below our capitalization threshold, are expensed as incurred.

At the inception of a contract the Company assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. The Company’s assessment is based on: (1) whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset, (2) whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset throughout the period, and (3) whether it has the right to direct the use of the asset. The Company allocates the consideration in the contract to each lease component based on its relative stand-alone price to determine the lease payments. The Company has elected to not recognize right of use assets and lease liabilities for short term leases that have a term of 12 months or less.

The purchase price of an acquisition is allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. To the extent the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets assumed, such excess is allocated to goodwill. The Company determines the estimated fair values after review and consideration of relevant information, including discounted cash flows and estimates made by management. The Company records the net assets and results of operations of an acquired entity from the acquisition date. Acquisition-related costs are recognized separately from the acquisition and are expensed as incurred.

~~Administrative costs for patents for which it believes it will achieve future economic value benefits are accumulated on the balance sheet as a patent asset~~Directors until such time as such authority has been delegated to a ~~patent is issued. The costs of these intangible assets are classified as a long-term asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over the legal life of such asset, which is typically~~ 20 ~~years. In the event a patent is denied or abandoned, all accumulated administrative costs will be expensed in the period in which the patent was denied or abandoned.~~

Assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets, are recorded at fair value upon acquisition and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives except for customer relationships, for which the amortization is recorded on an accelerated method over the estimate useful life.

~~Goodwill represents the excess~~committee of the ~~purchase prices~~Board of ~~an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible~~Directors. The 2011 Plan was ratified by our shareholders in 2012 and intangible assets. The Company is required to assess goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. Such assessment is performed at the reporting unit level, for which the Company has one. The Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test, including macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, and our overall financial performance. If, after completing the qualitative assessment, it is determined it is more likely than not that the estimated fair value is greater than the carrying value, the Company concludes no impairment exists. Alternatively, if the Company determinesexpired in the qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value, then the Company performs a quantitative goodwill impairment test to identify both the existence of an impairment and the amount of impairment loss, by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying value, then a goodwill impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The goodwill annual assessment test is performed in the fourth quarter of every year or when an event occurs, or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist. There were no such triggering events during the year ended December 31, 2022 and the annual testing was performed in the fourth quarter with no impairment identified.

Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. There were no events triggering a review for impairment during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Revenue is recognized by applying the following five steps: 1) identify the contracts with a customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations; and 5) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation.

Revenues from professional services such as relocations, charger replacements or out of warranty repairs are recognized when services are performed. Revenue values are based upon fixed fee arrangements or hourly fee-based arrangements with agreed to hourly rates of service categories in line with expertise requirements. These services are billed to a customer as such services are provided and the customer will be obligated to make payments for such services typically within a 30-45 day period.

~~Revenue is recorded net of discounts and sales taxes collected on behalf of governmental authorities; shipping and handling fees billed to customers are recorded as revenues.~~

The Company generally provides a standard one-year warranty on its EV charging infrastructure products for materials and workmanship but may provide multiple year warranties as negotiated, and it will pass on the warranties from its vendors, if any, which generally covers this one-year period. The Company accrues for product warranties when the loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. During the year-ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a $~~0.2 million~~ ~~product warranty accrual in Accrued Expenses with an offset to Cost of Revenues, of which $0.1 million~~ ~~in repairs were completed during the year ended December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had~~ no ~~product warranty accrual based on the Company’s minimal warranty expense.~~

The Company records direct material and component costs, direct labor and associated benefits, and manufacturing overhead costs such as supervision, manufacturing equipment depreciation, rent, and utility costs, all of which are included in inventory prior to a sale, as costs of revenues. The Company further includes shipping and handling costs as cost of revenues.

~~Expenditures for research and development of the Company’s products are expensed when incurred and are included in operating expenses. The Company recognized research and development costs of $1.2 million~~ ~~and $0.4 million~~ ~~for the years ending December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.~~

~~The Company conducts advertising for the promotion of its products and services. Advertising costs are charged to operations and included in operating expenses when incurred. Such amounts aggregated $0.2 million~~ ~~in 2022 and $0.1 million~~ in 2021.

Compensation expense related to stock awards are measured based on an estimated fair value and the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the shorter of the service periods or vesting periods using the straight-line attribution method.

The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Forfeitures are accounted for as incurred, as a reversal of share-based compensation expense related to awards that will not vest. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. Compensation expense for time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) is recognized ratably over the vesting period. A portion of RSUs granted contain performance conditions for vesting tied to specific Company goals, such as gross margin and revenue targets (PSUs). For the purpose of measuring compensation expense of PSUs, the number of shares expected to vest is estimated at each reporting date based on management’s expectations regarding the relevant performance criteria.

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred asset will not be realized.

The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company believes its tax positions are all highly certain of being upheld upon examination. As such, the Company has not recorded a liability for unrecognized tax benefits. As of December 31, 2022, tax years 2019 through 2021 remain open for IRS audit. The Company has received no notice of audit from the IRS for any of the open tax years.

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common stock outstanding for the period, and, if dilutive, potential common stock outstanding during the period. Potential common stock consists of the incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options, stock warrants, convertible debt instruments or other common stock equivalents. Potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.

~~Options to purchase~~ ~~336,758~~ ~~common shares, warrants to purchase~~ ~~440,204~~ ~~shares of common stock, and restricted stock units to purchase~~ ~~213,750~~ ~~common shares were outstanding at December 31, 2022. Options to purchase~~ ~~263,433~~ ~~common shares and warrants to purchase~~ ~~519,658~~ ~~shares of common stock were outstanding at December 31, 2021. There were~~ no restricted stock units outstanding at December 31, 2021. These shares were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 because the effects would have been anti-dilutive. These options and warrants may dilute future earnings per share.

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Company management and its legal counsel assess such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company's legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company's financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be reasonably estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable would be disclosed. The Company does not include legal costs in its estimates of amounts to accrue.

The Company assesses its segment reporting based on how it internally manages and reports the results of its business to its chief operating decision maker. For periods through the date of the All Cell acquisition, the Company had, and reported in, one reportable segment. Subsequent to the acquisition of All Cell, management continues to review financial results, manage the business and allocate resources on an aggregate basis. Therefore, financial results continue to be reported in a single operating segment.

~~In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU~~ ~~2016-13,~~~~Financial Instruments – Credit Losses~~ (ASC Topic 326) requiring initial recognition of credit losses, as well as any subsequent change in the estimate, when it is probable that a loss has been incurred. The standard eliminates the threshold for initial recognition in current U.S. GAAP and it covers a broad range of financial instruments, including trade and other receivables at each reporting date. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets. The standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2023. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on our financial statements.

~~The Company has a history of net losses, including in the accompanying financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 where the Company had net losses of $19.7 million~~ ~~(which includes $9.1 million~~ ~~of non-cash expenses) and $6.6 million~~ ~~(which includes $1.3 million~~ of non-cash expenses), respectively, and net cash used in operating activities of $18.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively. During 2022, the $18.1 million of operating cash usage included $9.0 million increase in inventory and inventory-related prepayments to vendors to reduce the risk of potential shortages of cells required for battery manufacturing, and to increase work in process and finished inventory of EV ARC™ units based on forecasted requirements.

~~At December 31, 2022, the Company had a cash balance of $1.7~~ ~~million and working capital of $6.8 million~~. The working capital balance has been reduced by a current liability of $6.8 million for contingent consideration, which is non-cash. Based on the Company’s current operating plan, the Company believes that it has the ability to fund its operations and meet contractual obligations for at least twelve months from the date of this report. In September 2022, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement with B. Riley Principal Capital II, LLC (“B. Riley”) under which the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell up to $30.0 million shares or a maximum of 2.0 million shares of its common stock over a period of 24 months in its sole discretion (see note 11 for further information). The Company issued ~~37,741~~ ~~shares in January and February 2023 for $.7 million~~ ~~under this agreement. Furthermore, we could pursue other equity or debt financings. In addition, the Company’s outstanding warrants have generated $0.5 million~~ ~~and $2.9 million~~ of proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The Company believes that it will become profitable in the next few years as our revenues continue to grow, we improve our gross margins and we leverage our overhead costs, but we expect to continue to incur losses for a period of time. There is no guarantee that profitable operations will be achieved, the warrants will be exercised or that additional capital or debt financing will be available.

On March 4, 2022, the Company completed its acquisition of substantially all the assets of All Cell Technologies, LLC (“All Cell”), a leader in energy storage solutions. We believe this strategic acquisition will increase and diversify our Company’s revenue, gross profitability, manufacturing capabilities, intellectual portfolio and customer base. The Company purchased substantially all of the assets and business of All Cell for ~~1,055,000~~ ~~shares of Beam Common Stock (“Closing Consideration”) plus an additional $0.8 million in cash for the net working capital held by All Cell at closing.~~

In addition, All Cell is eligible to earn an additional number of shares of Beam Common Stock if Beam’s new energy storage business meets certain revenue milestones (the “Earnout Consideration”). The Earnout Consideration is: (i) two times the amount of energy storage products revenue and contracted backlog that is greater than $7.5 million for 2022, and (ii) two times the amount of energy storage products 2023 revenue only which exceeds the greater of either $13.5 million or 135% of the 2022 cumulative revenue, capped at $20.0 million. Revenues exceeding $20.0 million in 2023 will not be eligible for the Earnout Consideration. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Beam Common Stock that the Company will issue to All Cell for the Closing Consideration and Earnout Consideration will not exceed 1.8 million shares. Revenue from energy storage products used in Beam Global products will not be considered as contributing to the Earnout calculation.

~~The fair value of consideration transferred consisted of the following (in thousands):~~

~~The following table summarizes the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in thousands):~~

~~The Company incurred $0.1 million~~ ~~of transaction costs during the year ended December 31, 2022, directly related to the acquisition that is reflected in operating expenses in the statement of operations.~~

Goodwill represents the excess of the total purchase price over the fair value of the underlying net assets, largely arising from synergies expected to be achieved by the combined company and expanded market opportunities. The goodwill is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.

The valuation of the Earnout Consideration was performed using a two-factor Monte Carlo simulation, which includes estimates and assumptions such as forecasted revenues of All Cell, volatility, discount rates, share price and the milestone settlement value. As such valuation includes the use of unobservable inputs, it is considered to be a Level 3 measurement. The fair value of the Earnout Consideration is reassessed on a quarterly basis with the change recorded to operating expenses. Change in the fair value of the Earnout Consideration during the year ended December 31, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):

~~The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill acquired are as follows ($ in thousands):~~

The fair values of the developed technology, trade name, customer relationships and backlog were estimated using an income approach. Under the income approach, an intangible asset’s fair value is equal to the present value of future economic benefits in the form of cash flows to be derived from ownership of the asset. The estimated fair values were developed by discounting future net cash flows to their present value at market-based rates of return. The useful lives of the intangible assets for amortization purposes were determined by considering the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair values of the intangible assets adjusted as appropriate for entity-specific factors including legal, competitive, and other factors that may limit the useful life. The identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives except for customer deposits which uses accelerated depreciation.

The following pro forma unaudited financial information summarizes the combined results of operations of Beam Global and All Cell as if the companies had been combined as of the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2021 (unaudited and in thousands):

The pro forma unaudited financial information is presented for information purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the year ended December 31, 2021. In addition, the pro forma unaudited financial information is not a projection of future results of operations of the combined company, nor does it reflect the expected realization of any synergies or cost savings associated with the acquisition. The pro forma unaudited financial information includes adjustments to reflect the incremental amortization expense of the identifiable intangible assets and transaction costs, as well as removes the impact of the debt that was not acquired by the Company and payments to a non-employee.

~~The statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes revenues of $5.2 million~~ ~~and loss from operations of $10.1 million, respectively, from the acquired All Cell business.~~

~~Prepaid expenses and other current assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):~~

~~Related party receivables as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 consisted primarily of payroll related taxes due for stock-based compensation.~~

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Costs are determined using the first in-first out (FIFO) method. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, inventory consists of the following (in thousands):

~~Depreciation expense for 2022 and 2021 was $0.4 million~~ ~~and $0.1 million, respectively. In 2022, $0.2 million~~ ~~of depreciation was capitalized into inventory as manufacturing overhead costs. Depreciation capitalized in 2021 was immaterial.~~

~~Intangible assets, net as of December 31, 2022 consist of the following (in thousands)~~:

~~Intangible assets as of December 31, 2021 consisted of patents, for which the gross carrying amount was $0.4 million. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $1.0 million~~ ~~and immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2021. Amortization expense for intangible assets held as of December 31, 2022 will be $1.2 million~~ ~~for 2023, and $1.1 million~~ ~~for each of the years 2024 – 2027.~~

~~The major components of accrued expenses are summarized as follows (in thousands):~~

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2022, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the results of our operations.

The Company enters into various contracts or agreements in the normal course of business whereby such contracts or agreements may contain commitments. Since inception, the Company entered into agreements to act as a reseller for certain vendors; joint development contracts with third parties; referral agreements where the Company would pay a referral fee to the referrer for business generated; sales agent agreements whereby sales agents would receive a fee equal to a percentage of revenues generated by the agent; business development agreements and strategic alliance agreements where both parties agree to cooperate and provide business opportunities to each other and in some instances, provide for a right of first refusal with respect to certain projects of the other parties; agreements with vendors where the vendor may provide marketing, investor relations, public relations, software licenses, technical consulting or subcontractor services, vendor arrangements with non-binding minimum purchasing provisions, and financial advisory agreements where the financial advisor would receive a fee and/or commission for raising capital for the Company.

On September 1, 2020, the Company entered into a five-year operating lease with two one-year options to extend the term of the lease. At this time, it is not reasonably certain that the Company will extend the term of the lease and, therefore, the renewal periods have been excluded from the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset. As part of the All Cell acquisition, the Company assumed a facility lease located in Broadview, Illinois, and recorded $~~0.2 million~~ in right-of-use asset and lease liability. The lease term ends on August 31, 2023 and contains clauses for annual rent escalation. The present values of the lease payment streams were calculated using an effective borrowing rate of 10~~%. The Company is currently evaluating options for its battery manufacturing facility.~~

~~During the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $0.6 million~~ ~~and $0.4 million, respectively. Operating lease cost for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $0.8 million~~ ~~and $0.7 million, respectively.~~

~~The future minimum rental commitments for our operating leases reconciled to the lease liability as of December 31, 2022 is as follows (in thousands):~~

~~The Company issued~~ ~~1,055,000~~ ~~shares of its common stock upon acquiring certain assets of All Cell during the year ended December 31, 2022. See further discussion in note 3. Business Combination.~~

On September 2, 2022, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and a Registration Rights Agreement with B. Riley. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company has the right, in its sole discretion, to sell to B. Riley up to $~~30.0 million~~, or a maximum of 2.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at 97% of the volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s common stock on the trading day, calculated in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, over a period of 24 months subject to certain limitations and conditions contained in the Purchase Agreement. Sales and timing of any sales are solely at the election of the Company, and the Company is under no obligation to sell any securities to B. Riley under the Purchase Agreement. As consideration for B. Riley’s commitment to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued 10,484 shares of its common stock and will issue an additional ~~10,484~~ ~~shares of its common stock or a cash payment of $150,000, at the Company’s sole discretion, sometime after the first VWAP purchase occurs.~~

The Company incurred an aggregate cost of approximately $0.4 million in connection with the Purchase Agreement, including the fair value of the 10,484 shares of common stock issued to B. Riley upon the execution of the agreement, which was recorded to prepaid expenses and other current assets on the Balance Sheet to be offset against future proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock under the Purchase Agreement.

~~During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company issued~~ ~~1,436~~ ~~shares under this agreement. The proceeds were fully offset by costs previously deferred.~~

On June 9, 2021, the Company’s stockholders approved the Beam Global 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) under which 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are ~~allowed~~reserved to be issued pursuant to the exercise of stock options or other awards granted under such plan in addition to the 630,000 shares previously ~~allowed~~reserved under the Beam Global 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2021 Plan will increase automatically on January 1 of each of 2022 through 2031 by the number of shares equal to 5% of the aggregate number of outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of the immediately preceding December 31, or a lesser number as may be determined by our board of directors or compensation committee. As

From January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023, the Company granted a total of 169,800 stock options under the 2021 Plan, which were granted to 86 of its employees.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our 2011 and 2021 Plan as of December 31, ~~2022, 1.9 million shares remain available~~2023:

Under Nevada General Corporation Law and our articles of incorporation, our directors and officers will have no personal liability to ~~grant under~~us or our stockholders for monetary damages incurred as the ~~2021 Plan.~~result of the breach or alleged breach by a director or officer of his “duty of care.” This provision does not eliminate or limit the liability of a director or officer for (i) acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law or (ii) the payment of dividend in violation of Section 78.300 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. This provision would generally absolve directors of personal liability for negligence in the performance of duties, including gross negligence.

Stock options are granted to new and existing employees. New employee option grants generally have a term of ten years and vest ratably over four years. Existing employee option grants generally have a term of ten years and vest immediately upon grant.

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model incorporates certain assumptions for inputs including a risk-free market interest rate, expected dividend yield of the underlying common stock, expected option life and expected volatility in the market value of the underlying common stock based on our historical volatility. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility because the Company’s stock options and warrants have characteristics different from those of its traded stock, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

~~We used the assumptions in the table below and we assumed there would not be dividends granted for the options granted in fiscal 2022 and 2021:~~

~~Option activity for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:~~

The ~~Company’s~~effect of this provision in our articles of incorporation is to eliminate the rights of Beam Global and our stockholders (through stockholder’s derivative suits on behalf of Beam Global) to recover monetary damages against a director or officer for breach of his fiduciary duty of care (including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior) except in the situations described in clauses (i) through (ii) above. This provision does not limit nor eliminate the rights of Beam Global or any stockholder to seek non-monetary relief such as an injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director’s or officer’s duty of care. Nevada General Corporation Law grants corporations the right to indemnify their directors, officers, employees and agents in accordance with applicable law. Our bylaws provide for indemnification of such persons to the full extent allowable under applicable law. These provisions will not alter the liability of the directors under federal securities laws.

We intend to enter into agreements to indemnify our directors and officers, in addition to the indemnification provided for in our bylaws. These agreements, among other things, indemnify our directors and officers for certain expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, and settlement amounts incurred by any such person in any action or proceeding, including any action by or in the right of Beam Global, arising out of such person’s services as a director or officer of Beam Global, any subsidiary of Beam Global or any other company or enterprise to which the person provides services at the request of Beam Global. We believe that these provisions and agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified directors and officers.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling Beam Global pursuant to the foregoing provisions, Beam Global has been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock ~~option compensation expense was $0.9 million~~ ~~and $0.4 million~~ ~~for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and there was $1.1 million~~ ~~of total unrecognized compensation costs related to outstanding stock options at December 31, 2022 which will be recognized over~~ ~~3.9~~ ~~years. Total intrinsic value of options exercised was immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2022 and $1.8 million~~ ~~during the year ended December 31, 2021. Total intrinsic value of options outstanding and options exercisable were $2.2 million~~ ~~and $1.9 million, respectively,~~ as of ~~December 31, 2022. Number~~April 25, 2024 by:

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of ~~stock options vested~~the SEC and ~~unvested~~the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. To our knowledge, no person or entity, except as set forth below, is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the voting power of our common stock as of ~~December 31, 2022 were~~ ~~251,129~~ ~~and~~ ~~85,629, respectively.~~the close of business on April 25, 2024.

~~In November 2022,~~Under SEC rules, the ~~Company granted~~ ~~285,000~~ ~~restricted stock units (RSUs) to its Chief Executive Officer (CEO), half~~calculation of ~~which contains performance conditions (PSUs). 50% of~~ the ~~RSUs without performance condition vested upon grant, with 25% vesting on February 1~~^st ~~of 2024 and 2025. The~~ number of shares ~~issuable under~~of our common stock beneficially owned by a person and the ~~PSUs~~percentage ownership of that person includes both outstanding shares of our common stock then owned as well as any shares of our common stock subject to options or warrants held by that person that are ~~determined~~currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 25, 2024. Shares subject to those options or warrants for a particular person are not included as outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. We have based percentage ownership of our common stock on ~~the achievement~~14,526,654 shares of ~~performance metrics specific to the Company that is measured at the end~~our common stock outstanding as of ~~fiscal year~~April 25, 2024.

~~A summary~~Unless otherwise indicated, the address of ~~activity of~~each beneficial owner listed in the ~~RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2022~~table below is ~~as follows~~:

~~Stock compensation expense related to restricted stock units was $1.1 million~~ ~~during the year ended December 31, 2022, with $2.6 million~~ ~~in unrecognized stock compensation expense remaining to be recognized over~~ ~~2.2~~ ~~years as of December 31, 2022. Fair value of restricted stock units vested during the year ended December 31, 2022 was $0.9 million~~.

The Company issues restricted stock to the members of its board of directors as compensation for such members’ services. Such grants generally vest ratably over four quarters. The Company also issues restricted stock to its CEO, for which generally 50% of the shares granted vest ratably over four quarters and the remaining 50% vest ratably over twelve quarters. The common stock related to these awards are issued to an escrow account on the date of grant and released to the grantee upon vest. The fair value is determined based on the closing stock price of the Company’s common stock on the date granted and the related expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period.c/o Beam Global, 5660 Eastgate Drive, San Diego, California 92121.

~~A summary of activity of the restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:~~

~~Stock compensation expense related to restricted stock awards was $0.4 million~~ ~~and $0.7 million~~ ~~during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Fair values of restricted stock vested during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $0.4 million~~ ~~and $1.4 million, respectively.~~

~~As of December 31, 2022, there were unreleased shares of common stock representing $0.3 million~~ ~~of unrecognized restricted stock grant expense which will be recognized over two years.~~

~~A summary of activity of warrants outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows:~~

~~Exercisable warrants as of December 31, 2022 have a weighted average remaining contractual life of~~ ~~1.30~~ ~~years. The intrinsic value of the exercisable shares of the warrants at December 31, 2022 was $4.9 million~~.

~~During the year ended December 31, 2021,~~ ~~433,937~~ ~~warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s registered common stock and~~ ~~11,989~~ ~~warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s unregistered common stock were exercised generating $2.9 million~~. The unregistered securities were issued pursuant to the private placement exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All warrants exercised during the year ended December 31, 2022 were for the Company’s common stock.

~~For each of the identified periods, revenues can be categorized into the following (in thousands):~~

~~During the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021,~~ 29~~% and~~ 62~~% of revenues were derived from customers located in California, respectively. In addition,~~ 9~~% of revenues in the year ended December 31, 2022 were international sales compared to none in the prior year.~~

~~At December 31, 2022 and 2021, deferred revenue was $1.4 million~~ ~~and $0.3 million, respectively. These amounts consisted mainly of customer deposits in the amount of $1.0 million~~ ~~and $0.1 million~~ ~~for December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively and prepaid multi-year maintenance plans for previously sold products which account for $0.3 million~~ ~~and $0.2 million~~ for December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and pertain to services to be provided through 2028. Revenue recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022 which pertained to revenue deferred in prior years was $~~0.1 million~~ ~~and immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2021.~~

~~There was~~In addition to the director and executive officer compensation arrangements and indemnification arrangements discussed above under “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” and “Executive Compensation,” since January 1, 2021, we have not been a party to any transactions in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers, beneficial holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or entities affiliated with them, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation described above in “Non-Employee Director Compensation” and “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION”.

Our audit committee charter states that our audit committee is responsible for reviewing and approving in advance any related party transaction, which is a transaction between us and related persons in which the aggregate amount involved exceeds or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any calendar year and in which a related person has or will have a direct or indirect interest. Our audit committee has adopted policies and procedures for review of, and standards for approval of, such a related party transaction. For purposes of these policies and procedures, a related person is defined as an executive officer, director, or nominee for director, including his or her immediate family members, or a beneficial owner of greater than 5% our common stock, in each case since the beginning of the most recently completed year. Prior to the creation of our audit committee, our full Board of Directors reviewed related party transactions, with any directors abstaining from matters in which the director had an interest.

It is our intention to ensure that all future transactions between us and our officers, directors, and principal stockholders and their affiliates are approved by the audit committee of our Board of Directors and are on terms no ~~Federal income~~less favorable to us than those that we could obtain from unaffiliated third parties.

See section “Director Independence” set forth in Item 10 above is incorporated into this Item 13 by reference.

The following table sets forth all fees accrued or paid for audit and tax ~~expense~~fees for the years ended December 31, ~~2022~~2023, and ~~2021 due to the Company’s net losses. Income tax expense represents minimum state taxes due.~~2022:

~~The blended Federal and State tax rate of~~ ~~28.50% applies to loss before taxes. The Company’s tax expense differs from the “expected” tax expense for Federal income tax purposes, (computed by applying the United States Federal tax rate of~~ 21~~% to loss before taxes), as follows (in thousands):~~

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

Pre-approval Policy. Under our audit committee’s policy governing our use of the ~~Company’s history~~services of ~~incurring operating losses, a full valuation allowance has been established. The valuation allowance at~~our independent registered public accountants, the audit committee is required to pre-approve all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accountants in order to ensure that the provision of such services does not impair the public accountants’ independence. In the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, ~~was $18.3 million. The increase~~all fees identified above under the captions “Audit Fees,” and “All Other Fees” that were billed by RSM US LLP and Marcum LLP were approved by the audit committee in ~~the valuation allowance during 2022 was $5.4 million~~.accordance with SEC requirements.

AtIn the year ended December 31, ~~2022,~~2023, there were no other professional services provided by RSM US LLP or Marcum LLP, other than those listed above, that would have required our audit committee to consider their compatibility with maintaining the ~~Company has a net operating loss carry forward~~independence of $~~55.2 million, of which $25.1 million~~ ~~is available to offset future net income through 2037. The net operating loss (“NOL”) expires during the years 2027 to 2037 and $30.1 million~~ may be carried forward indefinitely and limited to offsetting 80% of taxable income. The utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon the ability of the Company to generate sufficient taxable income during the carryforward period. In the event that a significant change in ownership of the Company occurs as a result of the Company’s issuance of common stock, the utilization of the NOL carry forward will be subject to limitation under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Management does not presently believe that such a change has occurred.

No liability related to uncertain tax positions is recorded on the financial statements related to uncertain tax positions. There are no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2022. The Company does not expect that uncertain tax benefits will materially change in the next 12 months.

All tax returns will remain open for examination by the federal and state taxing authorities for three and four years, respectively, from the date of utilization of any net operating loss carryforwards.RSM US LLP or Marcum LLP.

On March 22, 2023, Beam Global entered into a five year agreement with OCI Limited to provide a supply chain line of credit for up to $100 million. Beam Global intends to use the funds to provide working capital to support business growth.

Part IV of the Original Filing is hereby amended solely to add the following exhibits required to be filed in connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints each of Desmond Wheatley and Katherine H. McDermott, true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:~~

Nevada	26-1342810
(State of Incorporation)	(IRS Employer ID Number)

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of principal U.S. market on which traded
Common stock, $0.001 par value	BEEM	Nasdaq Capital Market

~~Warrants~~	~~BEEMW~~	~~Nasdaq~~ ~~Capital Market~~

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☒	Smaller reporting company ☒
	Emerging growth company ☐

Auditor Name	Auditor Location	Auditor Firm ID
Marcum LLP	New York, NY	688

	PART I	1

~~ITEM 1~~	~~Business~~	2
~~ITEM 1A~~	~~Risk Factors~~	14
~~ITEM 1B~~	~~Unresolved Staff Comments~~	23
~~ITEM 2~~	~~Properties~~	23
~~ITEM 3~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~	23
~~ITEM 4~~	~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	23

	~~PART II~~	24

~~ITEM 5~~	~~Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities~~	24
~~ITEM 6~~	~~[Reserved]~~	24
~~ITEM 7~~	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	24
~~ITEM 7A~~	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~	33
~~ITEM 8~~	~~Financial Statements and Supplementary Data~~	33
~~ITEM 9~~	~~Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure~~	33
~~ITEM 9A~~	~~Controls and Procedures~~	33
~~ITEM 9B~~	~~Other Information~~	35
~~ITEM 9C~~	~~Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections~~	35

	~~PART~~ III	36

ITEM 10	Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance	361
ITEM 11	Executive Compensation	368
ITEM 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	3614
ITEM 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	3616
ITEM 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	3616

	PART IV	37

ITEM 15	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	37
~~ITEM 16~~	~~Form 10-K Summary~~	40

	~~(a)~~	~~volatility or decline of the Company’s stock price, or absence of stock price appreciation;~~

	~~(b)~~	~~fluctuation in quarterly results;~~

	~~(c)~~	~~failure of the Company to earn revenues or profits;~~

	~~(d)~~	~~inadequate capital to continue or expand its business, and the inability to raise additional capital or financing to implement its business plans;~~

	~~(e)~~	reductions in demand for the Company’s products and services, whether because of competition, general industry conditions, loss of tax incentives for solar power, technological obsolescence or other reasons;

	~~(f)~~	~~litigation with or legal claims and allegations by outside parties;~~

	~~(g)~~	~~insufficient revenues to cover operating costs, resulting in persistent losses;~~

	~~(h)~~	~~rapid and significant changes to costs of raw materials from government tariffs or other market factors;~~

	~~(i)~~	~~the preceding and other factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and other reports we may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time; and~~

	~~(j)~~	~~the factors set forth in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”~~

	·	~~electric vehicle charging infrastructure;~~

	·	~~energy storage solutions;~~

	·	~~energy security and disaster preparedness; and~~

	·	~~outdoor media advertising.~~

	·	our patented, renewably energized products dramatically reduce the cost, time and complexity of the installation and operation of EV charging infrastructure when compared to traditional, utility grid tied alternatives;

	·	~~our proprietary and patented energy storage solutions;~~

	·	~~our first-to-market advantage with EV charging infrastructure products which are renewably energized, rapidly deployed and require no construction or electrical work on site;~~

	·	our products’ capability to operate during grid outages and to provide a source of EV charging and emergency power rather than becoming inoperable during times of emergency or other grid interruptions;

	·	our ability to add sufficient electrical capacity to provide for the significant increase demand brought by EVs, without having to go through expensive, time consuming and risky utility grid expansion (adding power stations, transmission lines and distribution infrastructure like substations); and

	·	our ability to continuously create new and patentable inventions which are marketable and a complex integration of our proprietary technology and parts, and other commonly available engineered components, which create a further barrier to entry for our competition.

	1.	~~American made products~~18
	2.Signatures	~~Clean Energy~~
	3.	~~Energy Security~~
	4.	~~Electrified transportation~~
	5.	~~Transportation infrastructure~~20

	·	~~Economic Factors~~. ~~Our ability to deploy EV charging infrastructure with a fixed cost in environments with difficult, time consuming permitting and regulatory requirements and high construction and electrical costs.~~

	·	*~~Speed to deploy.~~* As EV adoption increases the requirement for EV charging infrastructure becomes more acute and more urgent. We are able to provide EV charging to locations in many cases in less time than it would take them to pull permits for grid-tied solutions.

	·	*~~Scalability.~~* Because we are not constrained by local construction, electrical and permitting requirements we are able to scale up EV charging deployments in a manner which is not feasible with traditional approaches because of construction, design and engineering challenges inherent in in-the-ground solutions.

	·	~~Sociocultural Factors~~. ~~High concentration of EV drivers and a cultural desire to be good stewards of the environment.~~

	·	~~Technological Factors~~. ~~Regions with good insolation, expensive energy costs, and poor or degraded air quality, and a lack of capacity or expensive upgrade requirements for their utility grid.~~

	·	*~~Consumer Products.~~* ~~Auto manufacturers are delivering more diverse and popular EV models such as Ford’s F150 Lightning, GM’s electric Hummer, Rivian’s RT1, Ford’s E Mustang and Kia’s EV6~~

		~~Political Factors~~. Political statements, mandates and laws supporting policy to reduce carbon emissions through the electrification of transportation. State and local governments focusing on the transportation industry and the electrification of fleet vehicles to reduce carbon emissions.

	·	~~Engaging government relations experts to educate decision makers on the value of our “Made in America” products.~~

	·	~~Increase marketing efforts to educate potential customers.~~

	·	~~Expanding our geographic footprint and customer base.~~

	·	~~Increasing our gross margins by increasing production volumes, improving operating efficiencies and reducing the cost of materials and production.~~

	·	~~Increase leverage of outsourcing as our manufacturing process scales.~~

	·	~~Expand our recurring revenue business.~~

	·	~~Educate potential customers regarding federal and other government grants, investment tax credits, and other incentives available to our customers.~~

	·	~~Capture market share of the electrified personal and public transportation space, which is at a nascent phase.~~

	·	~~Continue to expand our Outdoor Media Business unit.~~

	·	~~Continue to develop and innovate new products and building a strong IP portfolio.~~

	·	~~Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC) (Section 48 of the tax code). This may provide a tax credit, which is currently at 30% of the amount of a solar energy system purchase.~~

	·	~~Rule 179 Depreciation or Bonus Depreciation - allows our customers to accelerate depreciation of their solar energy system up to 80% of the cost of the system in the first year it is in service.~~

	·	The recent Bipartisan Infrastructure Law includes an update to an incentive which helps make EV chargers more accessible for commercial use. The tax credit for commercial entities now can be used for up to $100,000 per deployment.

	·	A federal infrastructure bill passed in November 2021 designated $7.5 billion for the deployment of 500,000 EV charging stations across the US, $5.0 billion of which will be made available under the new National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program which is allocated to state transportation departments and an additional $2.5 billion is available in grant opportunities to help connect rural and marginalized communities to electric vehicles. The Federal Government released a guidance manual on how NEVI funds should be spent in the first quarter of 2022. A picture of Beam Global’s products was used to illustrate the front cover of that manual.

	·	~~California approved a plan for nearly $2.9 billion in funding for 90,000 new electric vehicle chargers in the state in December 2022 through its California Energy Commission.~~

	·	The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the US Department of Transportation published a final rule on February 29, 2023 establishing regulations setting minimum standards and requirements for projects funded under the NEVI Program which will be effective March 30, 2023 through its California Energy Commission.

	·	The U.S. Department of Transportation’s new Charging and Fueling Infrastructure (CFI) Discretionary Grant Program, established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, will provide $2.5 billion over five years to a wide range of applicants, including cities, counties, local governments, and tribes. This round of funding makes up to $700 million from Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 and 2023 funding available to strategically deploy EV charging and other alternative vehicle-fueling infrastructure projects in publicly accessible locations in urban and rural communities, as well as along designated Alternative Fuel Corridors (AFCs)

	o	Containers render a parking space unusable. Our products do not do that and that strength is protected by one of our patents. Most jurisdictions have a minimum number of parking spaces required for the use on the property. If you remove even one parking space then the property can drop out of compliance. Our products do not reduce available parking but shipping containers in a parking space do.
	o	A 20ft shipping container does not fit into a standard legal parking space which measures 9’X18’. Two feet of the container will encroach on the drive aisle which is generally not a good idea and often illegal because drive aisles can also serve as fire lanes.
	o	~~Container does not have BeamTrak™, our patented sun tracking and as such cannot get the same energy density which means less electricity to deliver to EVs.~~
	o	Containers can be considered unsightly and many property owners may not want them in their parking lots even without the above points being made. We have been told that our products are viewed as attractive and we often hear that they have a sort of “Apple” look about them which enhances the customer location.

	·	Paired Power offers a “pop up” solar canopy but we do not believe that it fits inside a legal sized parking space without reducing available parking. We also do not believe that it can withstand the same environmental conditions such as wind and seismic that our EV ARC™ product can. It also must be assembled by on-site personnel in contrast to EV ARC™’s rapid assembly-free unfolding deployment.
	·	Volta (NYSE: SNPR) is a San Francisco based EV charging company which derives revenue through the sale of advertising. Volta provides some free charging for EVs and are deployed in shopping malls and other similar locations. While they do not have solar-powered, rapidly deployed infrastructure solutions, their business model of using media revenue instead of EV charging fees most closely matches our media business model. Volta was recently acquired by Shell.

	o	Rapid deployability and scalability of our products. Our products offer a turnkey solution that is manufactured in our facility and delivered to a customer and can be deployed in less than an hour. This compares with requiring an entire ecosystem involving the design, engineering, permitting and constructing of civil projects which requires engaging a company, or group of companies, including architects, civil engineers, electrical engineers, zoning specialists, consultants, general contractors, electrical contractors, and EVSE vendors. These grid-tied projects can take six months to two years to complete.
	o	Lower total cost of ownership. Beam’s products are powered by renewable sources. As a result, there is no charge for on-going energy to power vehicles because our products do not generate a utility bill.
	o	Ability to operate during blackouts and brownouts. Most of the EV ARC™ systems we deploy include an emergency power panel that can be used for emergency power to charge other devices and emergency equipment during outages. Typical grid-tied solutions fail during grid failures and do not provide a source of emergency power. Even those grid-tied solutions that have back up battery integration rely on the grid to charge their batteries. During prolonged grid failures, those systems fail while Beam products continue to operate.

o	Because a grid connection is not required, Beam’s EV ARC™ can be located anywhere, including remote locations that are hard to connect to a grid. Most grid-tied chargers are deployed in locations where the utility grid is easy and inexpensive to connect to. Many EV drivers have experienced this when they find charging units behind supermarkets next to dumpsters. This is because the utility grid interconnection exists at the back of the store and as such that is the cheapest place to deploy. We believe that early adopters of EVs are more willing to make these sorts of concessions than mainstream consumers will be. We believe that in the future two impacts will drive the installation of EV chargers in more expensive and complicated locations where grid connection is concerned. First, the locations close to grid connections will be used first and second mainstream consumers will not be content with parking and charging in less convenient locations which are generally perceived as unsafe or ugly or both. Both impacts will drive the deployment of EV chargers in front of stores and other locations where people want to park. Those locations typically do not have readily available grid connections so the cost and complexity to bring the grid to the charger will increase dramatically. The cost and complexity to deploy our products will not increase and in fact, we believe that, like any other manufacturing company, our costs will decrease while our efficiency and deployment velocity increases.
	·	We believe that the utility grid lacks sufficient capacity to replace oil as transportation fuel. The grid was not designed and has not been updated to do this. In many markets the grid is already operating at maximum capacity particularly during hot weather when people increase their air conditioning requirements. Our products provide extra capacity to charge EVs without requiring complicated, time consuming, environmentally impactful and risky expansions of the centralized utility grid infrastructure.
o	Environmentally sound product using clean energy. Grid-tied chargers rely upon electricity, more than 60% of which is generated by burning fossil fuels. The electricity our products provide is 100% emissions free. Furthermore, the construction activities required to dig trenches, manufacture and pour concrete and perform the other tasks related to the construction and electrical installation of a grid-tied charger are environmentally impactful and reduce the environmental benefits of EVs. Our products are deployed with minimal or no disruption or environmental impact making them a cleaner choice.
o	Beam products can be relocated which gives the customer the flexibility to move it if a job site changes or business needs change. Grid-tied installations are a permanent solution. Many of our customers operate in leased facilities. The transportability of our products means that a customer can remove them when a lease matures whereas grid-tied solutions become tenant improvements and a sunk investment.
o	BeamTrak™, our patented solar tracking solution which causes the solar array to follow the sun generating up to 25 percent more electricity than a fixed array, is a significant advantage for our products over any similar offering. Our unique ability to deliver 25% more driving miles to an EV from an off-grid solar installation is, we believe, a significant differentiator.
o	Our ability to continuously improve our product’s energy production while reducing costs means that while the grid-tied competition is stuck at a theoretical maximum amount of energy that can be delivered at a given location, our products have continued to deliver more power without costing more.
o	~~Beam offers a product that delivers DC fast charging solely from solar generation, which we have not seen in the market to date.~~

	·	perceptions about EV quality, safety (in particular with respect to lithium-ion battery packs), design, performance and cost, especially if adverse events or accidents occur that are linked to the quality or safety of EVs;

	·	~~the limited range over which EVs may be driven on a single battery charge and concerns about running out of power without access to sufficient charging infrastructure;~~

	·	~~improvements in the fuel economy of the internal combustion engine;~~

	·	~~the environmental consciousness of consumers;~~

	·	~~volatility in the cost of oil and gasoline;~~

	·	~~consumers’ perceptions of the dependency of the U.S. on oil from unstable or hostile countries and the impact of international conflicts;~~

	·	~~government regulations and economic incentives promoting fuel efficiency and alternate forms of energy;~~

	·	~~access to charging stations and consumers’ perceptions about convenience and cost to charge an EV; and~~

	·	~~the availability of tax and other governmental incentives to purchase and operate EVs or future regulation requiring increased use of nonpolluting vehicles.~~

	·	~~cost-effectiveness and efficiency of solar power technologies as compared with conventional and non-solar alternative energy technologies;~~

	·	~~performance and reliability of solar power products as compared with conventional and non-solar alternative energy products;~~

	·	fluctuations in economic and market conditions which impact the viability of conventional and non-solar alternative energy sources, such as increases or decreases in the prices of oil and other fossil fuels;

	·	~~continued deregulation of the electric power industry and broader energy industry; and~~

	·	~~availability of governmental subsidies and incentives.~~

	·	~~changes in our industry;~~

	·	~~competitive pricing pressures;~~

	·	~~our ability to obtain working capital financing;~~

	·	~~additions or departures of key personnel;~~

	·	~~limited “public float” in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or negative pricing pressure on the market price for our common stock;~~

	·	~~sales of our common stock privately or in the public market, by us or by other shareholders;~~

	·	~~our ability to execute our business plan;~~

	·	~~operating results that fall below expectations;~~

	·	~~loss of any strategic relationship;~~

	·	~~adverse regulatory developments;~~

	·	~~adverse economic and other external factors;~~

	·	~~additional dilution of ownership because of the issuance of new securities by us, and period-to-period fluctuations in our financial condition or operating results.~~

	-	EV ARC™ Electric Vehicle Autonomous Renewable Charger – a patented, rapidly deployed, infrastructure product that uses integrated solar power and battery storage to provide a mounting asset and a source of power for factory installed electric vehicle charging stations of any brand. The electronics are elevated to the underside of the solar array making the unit flood-proof up to nine and a half feet and allowing adequate space to park a vehicle on the engineered ballast and traction pad which gives the product stability.

	-	Solar Tree® DCFC – Off-grid, renewably energized and rapidly deployed, patented single-column mounted smart generation and energy storage system with the capability to provide a 150kW DC fast charge to one or more electric vehicles or larger vehicles.

	-	~~EV ARC™ DCFC – DC Fast Charging system for charging EVs comprised of four interconnected EV ARC™ systems and a 50kW DC fast charger.~~

	-	~~EV-Standard~~^TM – patent issued on December 31, 2019 and currently under development. A lamp standard, EV charging and emergency power product which uses an existing streetlamp’s foundation and a combination of solar, wind, grid connection and onboard energy storage to provide curbside charging.

	-	~~UAV ARC™ - patent issued on November 24, 2020 and still under development. An off-grid, renewably energized and rapidly deployed product and network used to charge aerial drone (UAV) fleets.~~

	·	our patented, renewable energy products dramatically reduce the cost, time and complexity of the installation and operation of EV charging infrastructure and outdoor media platforms when compared to traditional, utility grid tied alternatives;

	·	~~our proprietary and patented energy solutions;~~

	·	~~our first-to-market advantage with EV charging infrastructure products which are renewably energized, rapidly deployed and require no construction or electrical work on site;~~

	·	our products’ capability to operate during grid outages and to provide a source of EV charging and emergency power rather than becoming inoperable during times of emergency or other grid interruptions; and

	·	our ability to continuously create new and patentable inventions which are marketable and a complex integration of our proprietary technology and parts, and other commonly available engineered components, which create a further barrier to entry for our competition.

	December 31,
		2,022			2021
Cash provided by (used in):
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(18,114	)	$	(6,408	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(1,812	)	$	(582	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$	(342	)	$	2,236

	·	The Company currently does not have sufficient controls in place to ensure that all inventory is appropriately tracked and recorded on a timely basis, given the lack of an automated tracking system and the manual nature of its current processes and controls surrounding inventory.

		The Company performs manual processes during the year to track and control inventory transactions, apply labor and overheads to inventory and to perform a wall-to-wall physical inventory at the end of the year to confirm the ending inventory balance and valuation. While these processes provide good results in determining inventory and cost of sales transactions, as we grow, it has become a very time-consuming process and could impact our ability to submit timely reporting. While manual controls improved significantly in 2022 at our San Diego location, we determined we had similar issues with manufacturing systems at our Chicago facility that was added in 2022 as a result of the AllCell Technologies, Inc. acquisition. A manufacturing system will provide automated processes, better controls, and improved management tools to analyze and plan production. This will avoid over-purchasing or shortages of inventory.

Name	Age	Position
Desmond Wheatley	58	President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Lisa Potok	55	Chief Financial Officer
Sandra Peterson	61	Vice President of Sales and Marketing
Mark Myers	48	Chief Operating Officer
Anthony Posawatz ⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾	64	Director
Peter Davidson ⁽¹⁾	64	Director
Judy Krandel ⁽¹⁾	59	Director
George Syllantavos⁽¹⁾	59	Director

⁽¹⁾	Member of the Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Governance, and Equity Oversight Committees
⁽²⁾	Lead Independent Director

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ⁽¹⁾		Restricted Stock Awards ⁽²⁾		Total
Anthony Posawatz	$	115,000	$	57,285	$	172,285
Peter Davidson	$	70,000	$	76,095	$	146,095
Nancy Floyd	$	40,000	$	76,095	$	116,095
Judy Krandel	$	6,087	$	4,557	$	10,644
George Syllantavos	$	4,076	$	3,273	$	7,349

⁽¹⁾	Represents the cash quarterly retainer and the meeting attendance fees earned by the non-employee directors.
⁽²⁾	Represents the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stock awards granted during 2023, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the valuation assumptions used in the calculations, see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part IV, Item 15 of our Form 10-K.

	·	Form 4s reporting restricted stock awards granted to each of Anthony Posawatz, Nancy Floyd and Peter Davidson in June 2023.
	·	Form 4 reporting restricted stock award granted to Judy Krandel on December 4, 2023 reported on December 7, 2023.

Name and Principal Position	Fiscal Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)(1)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Desmond Wheatley	2023	400,000	400,000		–	–			800,000
President and Chief	2022	400,000	350,000	3,869,250	–	–	33,965	⁽²⁾	4,653,215
Executive Officer

Katherine McDermott	2023	300,000	300,000	–	–	–	–		600,000
Chief Financial Officer (Jul 2019 – Dec 2023)	2022	220,000	220,000	–	–	–	–		440,000

Lisa Potok	2023	25,833	12,917		330,395	–	–		369,145
Chief Financial Officer (Dec 2023)	2022	–	–	–	–	–	–		–

Sandra Peterson	2023	195,000	39,000	–	–	–	219,644	⁽³⁾	453,644
VP of Sales and Marketing	2022	195,000	39,000	–	–	–	44,995	⁽³⁾	278,995

~~ITEM 15.~~⁽¹⁾	This represents the fair value of the award as of the grant date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a discussion of the valuation assumptions used in the calculations, see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part IV, Item 15 of our Form 10-K.
⁽²⁾~~EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.~~	Mr. Wheatley’s all other compensation reflects amounts paid by the Company for federal income taxes for common stock that vested in June and September 2022.
⁽³⁾	Ms. Peterson’s all other compensation reflects commission income.

		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description	Form	File No.	Exhibit	Filing Date	Filed Herewith

2.1	Asset Purchase Agreement By and Between Beam Global and AllCell Technologies, LLC dated February 16, 2022	8-K	001-38868	10.1	2/23/2022

3.1	Articles of Incorporation	SB-2	333-147104	3.1	11/2/2007

3.2	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated December 23, 2016	S-1/A	333-226040	3.1.2	4/4/2019

3.3	Certificate of Change to Articles of Incorporation dated April 11, 2019	8-K	001-38868	3.1	4/18/2019

3.4	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated September 14, 2020	8-K	000-53204	3.1	9/14/2020

3.5	Bylaws of Registrant	SB-2	333-147104	3.2	11/2/2007

3.6	Amendment to Bylaws	8-K	000-53204	10.2	7/16/2014

4.1	Description of Registrant's Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.	10-K	001-38868	4.1	3/30/2020

4.2	Form of Investor Warrant	S-1	333-226040	4.2	4/11/2019

4.3	Warrant Agency Agreement by and between Envision Solar International, Inc. and Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc.	8-K	001-38868	4.2	4/18/2019

4.4	Form of Representative Warrant	8-K	001-38868	4.1	4/18/2019

4.5	Form of Warrant issued to bridge lender on August 27, 2018	8-K	001-38868	10.3	8/31/2018

4.6	Form of Warrant for Bridge Refinance Convertible Secured Promissory Note	S-1	333-226040	4.6	3/25/2019

10.1*	2011 Stock Incentive Plan of Envision Solar International, Inc., dated as of August 10, 2011	10-Q	001-38868	4.1	8/15/2011

10.2*	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement	10-Q	001-38868	10.3	11/14/2019

10.3*	Form of Stock Option Agreement	10-Q	001-38868	10.4	11/14/2019

10.4	Amended and Restated 10% Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note, dated as of December 31, 2010, issued to John Evey	8-K	000-53204	10.22	2/12/2010

10.5*	Employment Agreement by and between Envision Solar International, Inc. and Desmond Wheatley, effective as of January 1, 2016	8-K	000-53204	10.1	10/20/2016

10.6*	Amendment to Employment Agreement for Desmond Wheatley, effective as of January 1, 2016	S-1	333-226040	10.30	9/24/2018

10.7*	Amendment to Employment Agreement for Desmond Wheatley, effective as of January 1, 2021	8-K	000-53204	10.1	2/12/2021

10.8	Revolving Convertible Promissory Note, dated September 18, 2017	8-K	000-53204	10.1	9/22/2017

10.9	Security Agreement -Purchase Order Financing, dated September 18, 2017	8-K	000-53204	10.3	9/22/2017

10.10	Security Agreement – Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated September 18, 2017	8-K	000-53204	10.4	9/22/2017

10.11	Promissory Note for bridge loan, dated August 27, 2018	8-K	001-38868	10.1	8/31/2018

10.12	Securities Purchase Agreement for the bridge loan, dated August 27, 2018	8-K	000-53204	10.2	8/31/2018

10.13*	Promissory Note for Deferred Compensation of Desmond Wheatley, dated effective January 15, 2016	S-1	333-226040	10.31	9/24/2018

10.14	Amendment to Promissory Note with SFE VCF, LLC, dated December 1, 2018	S-1	333-226040	10.35	3/25/2019

10.15*	Offer letter to Katherine H. McDermott, dated July 12, 2019	8-K	001-38868	10.1	7/23/2019

10.16*	Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan	8-K	000-53204	10.2	2/12/2021

10.17	Lease Agreement – 5660 Eastgate Dr.	10-Q	000-53204	10.1	11/12/2020

10.18	2021 Beam Global Equity Incentive Plan	8-K	001-38868	10.1	6/14/2021

10.19	Common Stock Purchase Agreement	8-K	001-38868	10.1	9/2/2022

10.20	Registration Rights Agreement	8-K	001-38868	10.2	9/2/2022

10.21*	Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement	8-K	001-38868	10.1	11/17/2022

10.22*	Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement	8-K	001-38868	10.2	11/17/2022

23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (RSM US LLP)					X