0001692819us-gaap:IntersegmentEliminationMember2021-01-012021-12-31
Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20202023

— OR —

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __ to __


Commission File Number 001-38086

Vistra Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware36-4833255
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6555 Sierra DriveIrving,Texas75039(214)812-4600
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:Common stock, par value $0.01 per shareVSTNew York Stock Exchange
WarrantsVST.WS.ANew York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filerAccelerated filerNon-accelerated filerSmaller reporting companyEmerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐


TableIndicate by check mark whether any of Contents
those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2020,2023, the aggregate market value of the Vistra Corp. common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $9,084,469,142$9,654,651,880 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

AsIndicate the number of February 23, 2021, there were 483,716,012 shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, par value $0.01, outstandingas of Vistra Corp.the latest practicable date.
ClassOutstanding as of February 23, 2024
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share347,885,110

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the registrant's 2021 annual meetingRegistrant's definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2024 Annual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.



Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
i

Table of Contents
Item 15.

Vistra Corp.'s (Vistra) annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports and any amendments to those reports are made available to the public, free of charge, on the Vistra website at http://www.vistracorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Additionally, Vistra posts important information, including press releases, investor presentations, sustainability reports, and notices of upcoming events on its website and utilizes its website as a channel of distribution to reach public investors and as a means of disclosing material non-public information for complying with disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Investors may be notified of posting to the website by signing up for email alerts and RSS feeds on the "Investor Relations" page of Vistra's website. The information on Vistra's website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K. The representations and warranties contained in any agreement that we have filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 10-K, or that we have or may publicly file in the future, may contain representations and warranties that may (i) be made by and to the parties thereto at specific dates, (ii) be subject to exceptions and qualifications contained in separate disclosure schedules, (iii) represent the parties' risk allocation in the particular transaction, or (iv) be qualified by materiality standards that differ from what may be viewed as material for securities law purposes.

This annual report on Form 10-K and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of Vistra and its subsidiaries occasionally make references to Vistra (or "we," "our," "us" or "the Company"), Luminant, TXU Energy, Ambit, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power or U.S. Gas & Electric, when describing actions, rights or obligations of their respective subsidiaries. These references reflect the fact that the subsidiaries are consolidated with, or otherwise reflected in, the Vistra financial statements for financial reporting purposes. However, these references should not be interpreted to imply that the parent company is actually undertaking the action or has the rights or obligations of the relevant subsidiary company or vice versa.
iii

Table of Contents
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
2019 Form 10-KVistra's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2020Current and Former Related Entities:
Ambit or Ambit EnergyAmbit Holdings, LLC, and/or its subsidiaries (d/b/a Ambit), depending on context
CriusCrius Energy Trust and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
DynegyDynegy Inc., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Dynegy Energy ServicesDynegy Energy Services, LLC and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC (each d/b/a Dynegy, Better Buy Energy, Brighten Energy, Honor Energy and True Fit Energy), indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Vistra, that are REPs in certain areas of MISO and PJM, respectively, and are engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers.
Homefield EnergyIllinois Power Marketing Company (d/b/a Homefield Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to municipal customers
Luminantsubsidiaries of Vistra engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation and wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management
Merger SubBlack Pen Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra
OncorOncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a direct, majority-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings and formerly an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., that is engaged in regulated electricity transmission and distribution activities
ParentVistra Corp.
Public PowerPublic Power, LLC (d/b/a Public Power), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
TCEH or PredecessorTexas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, and, prior to the Effective Date, the parent company of the TCEH Debtors whose major subsidiaries included Luminant and TXU Energy
TriEagle EnergyTriEagle Energy, LP (d/b/a TriEagle Energy, TriEagle Energy Services, Eagle Energy, Energy Rewards, Power House Energy and Viridian Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of ERCOT and PJM that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
TXU EnergyTXU Energy Retail Company LLC (d/b/a TXU), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
U.S. Gas & ElectricU.S. Gas and Electric, LLC (d/b/a USG&E, Illinois Gas & Electric and ILG&E), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
Value Based BrandsValue Based Brands LLC (d/b/a 4Change Energy, Express Energy and Veteran Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
VistraVistra Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Vistra IntermediateVistra Intermediate Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra
Vistra OperationsVistra Operations Company LLC, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is the issuer of certain series of notes (see Note 12 to the Financial Statements) and borrower under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities
Vistra Zerosubsidiaries of Vistra engaged in the operation and development of renewables and energy storage assets resulting in continued modernization of our generation fleet.
Transmission System Operators:
CAISOThe California Independent System Operator
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.
ISO-NEISO New England Inc.
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
NYISONew York Independent System Operator, Inc.
iii

Table of Contents
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
Authoritative Organizations:
CFTCU.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
CPUCCalifornia Public Utilities Commission
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
FERCU.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FTCFederal Trade Commission
IEPAIllinois Environmental Protection Agency
IPCBIllinois Pollution Control Board
IRSU.S. Internal Revenue Service
MSHAU.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PUCTPublic Utility Commission of Texas
RCTRailroad Commission of Texas, which among other things, has oversight of lignite mining activity in Texas, and has jurisdiction over oil and natural gas exploration and production, permitting and inspecting intrastate pipelines, and overseeing natural gas utility rates and compliance
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
TCEQTexas Commission on Environmental Quality
TRETexas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols
Rules and Regulations:
CAAClean Air Act
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
IRAInflation Reduction Act of 2022
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
General Terms:
2022 Form 10-KVistra's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2023
Ambit Transactionthe acquisition of Ambit by an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra on November 1, 2019 (Ambit Acquisition Date)
AROasset retirement and mining reclamation obligation
CAAClean Air Act
CAISOThe California Independent System Operator
CARES ActCoronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
CCGTcombined cycle natural gas turbine
CFTCCCRU.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commissioncoal combustion residuals
Chapter 11 CasesCases in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) concerning voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) filed on April 29, 2014 (Petition Date) by Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH Corp.) and the majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC and TCEH but excluding Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (Debtors). On the Effective Date,October 3, 2016 (Effective Date), subsidiaries of TCEH that were Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases (TCEH Debtors), along with certain other Debtors that became subsidiaries of Vistra on that date (Contributed EFH Debtors), completed their reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases.Cases as subsidiaries of a newly formed company, Vistra (Emergence).
CMEChicago Mercantile Exchange
CO2
carbon dioxide
CPUCCrius TransactionCalifornia Public Utilities Commissionthe acquisition of equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly owned the operating business of Crius by an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra on July 15, 2019 (Crius Acquisition Date)
iv

Table of Contents
CriusCrius Energy Trust and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
CTcombustion turbine
Dynegy Mergerthe merger of Dynegy Inc., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on contextwith and into Vistra, with Vistra as the surviving corporation
Dynegy Energy ServicesMerger DateDynegy Energy Services, LLCApril 9, 2018, the date Vistra and Dynegy Energy Services (East), LLC (each d/b/acompleted the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2019, by and between Vistra and Dynegy Better Buy Energy, Brighten Energy, Honor Energy and True Fit Energy), indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Vistra, that are REPs in certain areas of MISO and PJM, respectively, and are engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers.
EBITDAearnings (net income) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
Effective DateEnergy HarborOctober 3, 2016, the date the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors completed their reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code and emerged from the Chapter 11 CasesEnergy Harbor Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
EmergenceESGemergence of the TCEH Debtorsenvironmental, social and the Contributed EFH Debtors from the Chapter 11 Cases as subsidiaries of a newly formed company, Vistra, on the Effective Date
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc.governance
ESSenergy storage system
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FERCU.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitchFitch Ratings Inc. (a credit rating agency)
FTCFederal Trade Commission
GAAPgenerally accepted accounting principles
GHGgreenhouse gas
GWhgigawatt-hours
Homefield EnergyGreen Finance FrameworkFramework adopted by the Company and made available on its website pursuant to which the Company may issue financial instruments to fund new or existing projects that support renewable energy and energy efficiency, with alignment to the Company's environmental, social, and governance strategy
Heat RateIllinois Power Marketing Company (d/b/Heat Rate is a Homefield Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiarymeasure of Vistra,the efficiency of converting a REP in certain areas of MISO that is engaged in the retail sale offuel source to electricity to municipal customers
ICEIntercontinental Exchange
IRCInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
ii

Table of Contents
IRSU.S. Internal Revenue Service
ISOindependent system operator
ISO-NEITCISO New England Inc.investment tax credit
kWkilowatt
LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate, an interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market
loaddemand for electricity
LTSAlong-term service agreements for plant maintenance
LuminantMarket Heat Ratesubsidiaries of Vistra engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation and wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management
market heat rateMarket Heat rate is a measure of the efficiency of converting a fuel source to electricity. Market heat rateRate is the implied relationship between wholesale electricity prices and natural gas prices and is calculated by dividing the wholesale market price of electricity, which is based on the price offer of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas plants), by the market price of natural gas.
Mergerthe merger of Dynegy with and into Vistra, with Vistra as the surviving corporation
Merger Agreementthe Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 29, 2017, by and between Vistra and Dynegy
Merger DateApril 9, 2018, the date Vistra and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtumillion British thermal units
Moody'sMoody's Investors Service, Inc. (a credit rating agency)
MSHAU.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration
MWmegawatts
MWhmegawatt-hours
NELPNortheast Energy, LP, a joint venture between Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc. and Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc., both indirect subsidiaries of Vistra, and certain subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. Prior to the NELP Transaction, NELP indirectly owned Bellingham NEA facility and the Sayreville facility.
NELP Transactiona transaction among Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc., Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. wherein the indirect subsidiaries of Vistra redeemed their ownership interest in NELP partnership in exchange for 100% ownership interest in NJEA, the entity which owns the Sayreville facility
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NJEANorth Jersey Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership
NOX
nitrogen oxide
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYISONew York Independent System Operator, Inc.
NYMEXthe New York Mercantile Exchange, a commodity derivatives exchange
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
OncorOncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a direct, majority-owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings and formerly an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., that is engaged in regulated electricity transmission and distribution activities
OPEBpostretirement employee benefits other than pensions
ParentVistra Corp.
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
Plan of ReorganizationThird Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization filed by the Debtors in August 2016 and confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in August 2016 solely with respect to the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors
PrefCoVistra Preferred Inc.
iii

Table of Contents
PrefCo Preferred Stock Saleas part of the Spin-Off, the contribution of certain of the assets of the Predecessor and its subsidiaries by a subsidiary of TEX Energy LLC to PrefCo in exchange for all of PrefCo's authorized preferred stock, consisting of 70,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share
Public PowerPublic Power, LLC (d/b/a Public Power), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
PUCTPublic Utility Commission of Texas
PURATexas Public Utility Regulatory Act
REPretail electric provider
RCTRailroad Commission of Texas, which among other things, has oversight of lignite mining activity in Texas
RTOregional transmission organization
S&PStandard & Poor's Ratings (a credit rating agency)
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities ActSecurities Act of 1933, as amended
SG&Aselling, general and administrative
SO2
sulfur dioxide
Spin-Offthe tax-free spin-off from EFH Corp. executed pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization on the Effective Date by the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors (Spin-Off), the contribution of certain of the assets of the Predecessor and its subsidiaries by a subsidiary of TEX Energy LLC to Vistra Preferred Inc. (PrefCo) in exchange for all of PrefCo's authorized preferred stock, consisting of 70,000 shares, par value $0.01 per share
PTCproduction tax credit
REPretail electric provider
RTOregional transmission organization
S&PStandard & Poor's Ratings (a credit rating agency)
Series A Preferred StockVistra's 8.0% Series A Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
v

Table of Contents
Series B Preferred StockVistra's 7.0% Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Green Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
Series C Preferred StockVistra's 8.875% Series C Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value, with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share
SG&Aselling, general and administrative
SO2
sulfur dioxide
SOFRSecured Overnight Financing Rate, the average rate at which institutions can borrow U.S. dollars overnight while posting U.S. Treasury Bonds as collateral
STsteam turbine
Tax Matters AgreementTax Matters Agreement, dated as of the Effective Date, by and among EFH Corp., Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and EFH Merger Co. LLC
TCJAThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, federal income tax legislation enacted in December 2017, which significantly changed the tax laws applicable to business entities
TCEH or PredecessorTexas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, and, prior to the Effective Date, the parent company of the TCEH Debtors whose major subsidiaries included Luminant and TXU Energy
TCEH Debtorsthe subsidiaries of TCEH that were Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases
TCEQTexas Commission on Environmental Quality
TRATax ReceivablesReceivable Agreement, containing certain rights (TRA Rights) to receive payments from Vistra related to certain tax benefits, including benefits realized as a result of certain transactions entered into at Emergence (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements)
TRETexas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols
TriEagle EnergyTriEagle Energy, LP (d/b/a TriEagle Energy, TriEagle Energy Services, Eagle Energy, Energy Rewards, Power House Energy and Viridian Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of ERCOT and PJM that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
TWhterawatt-hours
TXU EnergyTXU Energy Retail Company LLC (d/b/a TXU), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
U.S.United States of America
U.S. Gas & ElectricVistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit AgreementU.S. GasCredit agreement, dated as of February 4, 2022 (as amended, restated, amended and Electric, Inc. (d/b/a USG&E, Illinois Gas & Electric and ILG&E), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, a REP in certain areas of PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO that is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
Value Based BrandsValue Based Brands LLC (d/b/a 4Change Energy, Express Energy and Veteran Energy), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
VistraVistra Corp., formerly known as TCEH Corp.,restated, supplemented, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context. Onotherwise modified from time to time) by and among Vistra Operations, Vistra Intermediate, the Effective Date,lenders party thereto, the TCEH Debtorsother credit parties thereto, the administrative agent, the collateral agent, and the Contributed EFH Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 and became subsidiaries of Vistra Energy Corp. Effective July 2, 2020, Vistra Energy Corp. changed its name to Vistra Corp.other parties named therein
Vistra IntermediateOperations Credit AgreementCredit agreement, dated as of October 3, 2016 (as amended, restated, amended and restated, supplemented and/or otherwise modified from time to time), by and among Vistra Operations, Vistra Intermediate, Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiarythe lenders party thereto, the letter of Vistra
iv

Table of Contents
Vistra OperationsVistra Operations Company LLC, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra that iscredit issuers party thereto, the issuer of certain series of notes (see Note 11 toadministrative agent, the Financial Statements)collateral agent, and borrower under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilitiesother parties named therein
Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesVistra Operations Company LLC's $5.297 billion senior secured financing facilities (see Note 1112 to the Financial Statements)

vvi

Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including (without limitation) such matters as activities related to our financial or operational projections, capital allocation, capital expenditures, liquidity, dividend policy, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of power generation assets, market and industry developments and the growth of our businesses and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "intends," "plans," "potential," "will likely," "unlikely," "believe," "expect," "anticipated," "estimate," "should," "could," "may," "projection," "forecast," "target," "goal," "objective" and "outlook"), are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that in making any such forward-looking statement our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and risks and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion under Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations in this annual report on Form 10-K and the following important factors, among others, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in or implied by such forward-looking statements:

our ability to consummate the acquisition of Energy Harbor, and if consummated, our ability to achieve synergies and forecasted operational results;
the actions and decisions of judicial and regulatory authorities;
prevailing applicable federal, state and local governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the legislatures and other government actions of states in which we operate, the U.S. Congress, the FERC, the NERC, the TRE, the public utility commissions of states and locales in which we operate, CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the RCT, the NRC, the EPA, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate, the MSHA and the CFTC;
expectations regarding, or impacts of, environmental matters, including costs of compliance, availability and adequacy of emission credits, and the impact of ongoing proceedings and potential regulations or changes to current regulations;
legal and administrative proceedings and settlements;
general industry trends;
economic conditions, including the impact of any inflationary period, recession or economic downturn;
investor sentiment relating to climate change and utilization of fossil fuels in connection with power generation;
the severity, magnitude and duration of extreme weather events, drought and limitations on access to water, and other weather conditions and natural phenomena, contingencies and uncertainties relating thereto;
acts of sabotage, geopolitical conflicts, wars, or terrorist, cybersecurity, cybercriminal, or cyber-espionage threats or activities;
risk of contract performance claims by us or our counterparties, and risks of, or costs associated with, pursuing or defending such claims;
our ability to collect trade receivables from counterparties in the amount or at the time expected, if at all;
our ability to attract, retain and profitably serve customers;
restrictions on or prohibitions of competitive retail pricing or direct-selling businesses;
adverse publicity associated with our retail products or direct selling businesses, including our ability to address the marketplace and regulators regarding our compliance with applicable laws;
changes in wholesale electricity prices or energy commodity prices, including the price of natural gas;
sufficiency of, access to, and costs associated with coal, fuel oil, natural gas, and uranium inventories and transportation and storage thereof;
changes in the ability of counterparties and suppliers to provide or deliver commodities, materials, or services as needed;
beliefs and assumptions about the benefits of state- or federal-based subsidies to our market competition, and the corresponding impacts on us, including if such subsidies are disproportionately available to our competitors;
the effects of, or changes to, market design and the power, ancillary services and capacity procurement processes in the markets in which we operate;
changes in Market Heat Rates in the CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM electricity markets;
our ability to effectively hedge against unfavorable commodity prices, including the price of natural gas, market heat rates and interest rates;
changes in market supply or demand and demographic patterns;
our ability to mitigate forced outage risk, including managing risk associated with Capacity Performance in PJM and performance incentives in ISO-NE;
efforts to identify opportunities to reduce congestion and improve busbar power prices;
vii

Table of Contents
access to adequate transmission facilities to meet changing demands;
changes in interest rates, commodity prices, rates of inflation or foreign exchange rates;
changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures;
access to capital, the attractiveness of the cost and other terms of such capital and the success of financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in capital markets;
our ability to maintain prudent financial leverage and achieve our capital allocation, performance, and cost-saving initiatives and objectives;
our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to make principal and interest payments in respect of, or refinance, our debt obligations;
our expectation that we will continue to pay (i) a consistent aggregate cash dividend amount to common stockholders on a quarterly basis and (ii) the applicable semiannual cash dividend to the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock stockholders, respectively;
our expectation that we will continue to make share repurchases under, and the possibility that we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of, our share repurchase program, and the possibility that the program may be suspended, discontinued or not completed prior to its termination;
our ability to implement and successfully execute upon our strategic and growth initiatives, including the completion and integration of mergers, acquisitions and/or joint venture activity, the identification and completion of sales and divestitures activity, and the completion and commercialization of our other business development and construction projects;
competition for new energy development and other business opportunities;
counterparties' collateral demands and other factors affecting our liquidity position and financial condition;
changes in technology (including large-scale electricity storage) used by and services offered by us;
changes in electricity transmission that allow additional power generation to compete with our generation assets;
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
significant changes in our relationship with our employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur or changes in laws or regulations relating to independent contractor status;
changes in assumptions used to estimate costs of providing employee benefits, including medical and dental benefits, pension and OPEB, and future funding requirements related thereto, including joint and several liability exposure under ERISA;
hazards customary to the industry and the possibility that we may not have adequate insurance to cover losses resulting from such hazards;
our ability to effectively and efficiently plan, prepare for and execute expected asset retirements and reclamation obligations and the impacts thereof, and
actions by credit rating agencies.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only at the date on which it is made, and except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict them. In addition, we may be unable to assess the impact of any such event or condition or the extent to which any such event or condition, or combination of events or conditions, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement. As such, you should not unduly rely on such forward-looking statements.

viii

Table of Contents
INDUSTRY AND MARKET INFORMATION

Certain industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources, including certain data published by CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate and NYMEX. We did not commission any of these publications, reports or other sources. Some data is also based on good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as the independent sources listed above. Industry publications, reports and other sources generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While we believe that each of these studies, publications, reports and other sources is reliable, we have not independently investigated or verified the information contained or referred to therein and make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Forecasts are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time, and we do not know what assumptions were used in preparing such forecasts. Statements regarding industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors.

ix

Table of Contents
PART I

Item 1.BUSINESS

References in this report to "we," "our," "us" and "the Company" are to Vistra and/or its subsidiaries, as apparent in the context. See Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations for defined terms.

BusinessGeneral

Vistra is a holding company operating an integrated retail electricity and electric power generation business primarily in markets throughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive energy activities including electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management andcompany. We combine an innovative, customer-centric approach to retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users. We incorporated under Delaware law in 2016. Effective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to Vistra Corp. to distinguish from companies that are involved in exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect our integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable, power.diverse, and efficient power generation. Our integrated power generation and wholesale operation allows us to efficiently obtain the electricity needed to serve our customers at the lowest cost. The integrated model enables us to structure products and contracts in a way that offers significant value compared to stand-alone retail electric providers.

We serve approximately 4.5 million customersThe Company brings its products and operateservices to market in 20 states and the District of Columbia.Columbia, including all major competitive wholesale power markets in the U.S. We serve approximately 4 million residential, commercial, and industrial retail customers with electricity and natural gas. Our generation fleet totals approximately 38,700 MW37,000 megawatts of generation capacity withpowered by a diverse portfolio, ofincluding natural gas, nuclear, coal, solar, and battery energy storage facilities. Vistra is guided by four core principles: we do business the right way, we work as a team, we compete to win, and we care about our stakeholders, including our customers, our communities where we work and live, our employees, and our investors.

Market Discussion

The operations of Vistra, hasas an integrated retail electricity and power generation company, are further aligned into six reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East, (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. InOur Texas, East, West and Sunset segments include our electricity generation operations, and our Asset Closure segment is engaged in the third quarterdecommissioning and reclamation of 2020, retired plants and mines.

Retail Operations

Vistra updated its reportable segmentsis one of the largest competitive residential retail electricity providers in the U.S. Our Retail operations are engaged in retail sales of electricity, natural gas and related services to reflect changesapproximately 4 million customers. Substantially all of our retail activities are conducted by TXU Energy, Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Our TXU Energy brand, which has been used to sell electricity to customers in how the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performancecompetitive retail electricity market in Texas for approximately 20 years, is registered and allocates resources. Management believesprotected by trademark law and is the only material intellectual property asset that we own. We have also acquired the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency intotrade names for Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric through the Company's long-term sustainableAmbit Transaction, Crius Transaction and the Dynegy Merger, as the case may be. As of December 31, 2023, we have reflected intangible assets and its commitment to managing the retirementon our balance sheet for our trade names of economically and environmentally challenged plants. See Market Discussion below andapproximately $1.341 billion (see Note 206 to the Financial Statements for further information concerning the updates to our reportable segments.Statements).

AcquisitionsThe largest portion of our retail operations are in Texas, where we provide retail electricity to approximately 2.5 million customers. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves by providing a distinctive customer experience predicated on delivering reliable and Merger

Ambit Transaction — On November 1, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiaryinnovative power products and solutions to our customers, which give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services. Our retail business also offers a comprehensive suite of Vistra completed the acquisition of Ambit (Ambit Transaction). Because the Ambit Transaction closed on November 1, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statementsgreen products and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Ambitservices, including 100% wind and its subsidiaries priorsolar options, as well as thermostats, dashboards and other programs designed to November 1, 2019. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Ambit Transaction.

Crius Transaction — On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Because the Crius Transaction closed on July 15, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statementsencourage reduced consumption and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Crius and its subsidiaries prior to July 15, 2019. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Crius Transaction.

Dynegy Merger Transaction — On the Merger Date, Vistra and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, with Vistra continuing as the surviving corporation. Because the Merger closed on April 9, 2018, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Dynegy prior to April 9, 2018. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Merger transaction.increased energy efficiency.

1

Table of Contents
Electricity Generation Operations

Vistra is the largest competitive power generator in the U.S. as measured by MWh. At December 31, 2023, our generating capacity was powered by the following:
Primary FuelTechnologyNet Capacity (MW)% of Net Capacity
Natural GasCCGT, CT or ST24,313 66%
CoalST8,428 23%
NuclearNuclear2,400 7%
RenewableSolar/Battery1,358 4%
Fuel OilCT203 —%
Total36,702 100%

Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 23 CCGT generation facilities totaling 19,512 MW and 11 peaking generation facilities totaling 4,801 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements and natural gas storage agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.

Our coal/lignite-fueled generation fleet is comprised of seven generation facilities totaling 8,428 MW of generation capacity. Maintenance outages at these units are scheduled during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. We meet our fuel requirements at our coal-fueled generation facilities in PJM and MISO with coal purchased from multiple suppliers under contracts of various lengths and transported to the facilities by either railcar or barges. We meet our fuel requirements in ERCOT using lignite that we mine at the Oak Grove generation facility and coal purchased and transported by railcar at the Coleto Creek and Martin Lake generation facilities.

We own and operate two nuclear generation units at the Comanche Peak plant site in ERCOT, each of which is designed for a capacity of 1,200 MW. Comanche Peak Unit 1 and Unit 2 went into commercial operation in 1990 and 1993, respectively, and are generally operated at full capacity. Refueling (nuclear fuel assembly replacement) outages for each unit are scheduled to occur every eighteen months during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. Every three years, the refueling cycle results in the refueling of both units during the same year, which occurred in 2023. While one unit is undergoing a refueling outage, the remaining unit is intended to operate at full capacity. During a refueling outage, other maintenance, modification and testing activities are completed that cannot be accomplished when the unit is in operation. The Comanche Peak facility operated at a capacity factor of 90%, 94% and 96% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

We have contracts in place for all of Comanche Peak's 2024 through 2027 nuclear fuel requirements. We do not anticipate any significant difficulties in acquiring uranium and contracting for associated conversion, enrichment and fabrication services in the foreseeable future, but we are closely monitoring developments that may arise out of the Russia and Ukraine conflict. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance– Macroeconomic Conditions.

Our generation operations by segment are represented in the following table:
SegmentNet Capacity (MW)% of Net CapacityISO/RTO
Texas18,151 49%ERCOT
East12,093 33%PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO
West1,880 5%CAISO
Sunset4,578 13%MISO, PJM and ERCOT
Total36,702 100%

2

Table of Contents
Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) — Separate from our operations, ISOs/RTOs administer the transmission infrastructure and markets across a regional footprint in most of the markets in which we operate. They are responsible for dispatching all generation facilities in their respective footprints and are responsible for both maximum utilization and reliable and efficient operation of the transmission system. ISOs/RTOs administer energy and ancillary service markets in the short term, which usually consists of day-ahead and real-time markets. Several ISOs/RTOs also ensure long-term planning reserves through monthly, semiannual, annual and multi-year capacity markets. The ISOs/RTOs that oversee most of the wholesale power markets in which we operate currently impose, and will likely continue to impose, bid and price limits or other similar mechanisms. NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs often have different geographic footprints, and while there may be geographic overlap between NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs, their respective roles and responsibilities do not generally overlap.

In ISO/RTO regions with centrally dispatched market structures (e.g., ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO, and CAISO), all generators selling into the centralized market receive the same price for energy sold based on the bid price associated with the production of the last MWh that is needed to balance supply with demand within a designated zone or at a given location. Different zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO may produce different prices respective to other zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO due to transmission losses and congestion. For example, a less efficient and/or less economical natural gas-fueled unit may be needed in some hours to meet demand. If this unit's production is required to meet demand on the margin, its offer price will set the market clearing price for all dispatched generation in the same market (although the price paid at other zones or locations may vary because of transmission losses and congestion), regardless of the price that any other unit may have offered into the market. Generators will receive the location-based marginal price for their output.

ERCOT — ERCOT is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 98,000 MW of expected Summer 2023 peak generation capacity to approximately 26 million Texas customers, representing approximately 90% of the state's electric load.

As an energy-only market, ERCOT's market design is distinct from other competitive electricity markets in the U.S. Other markets maintain a minimum planning reserve margin through regulated planning, resource adequacy requirements and/or capacity markets. In contrast, ERCOT's resource adequacy is currently predominately dependent on energy-market price signals. The PUCT has voted to recommend a Performance Credit Mechanism (PCM) that would align a required reliability standard with resource availability during higher-risk system conditions in a centrally-cleared market. These changes are currently being evaluated by the PUCT and ERCOT and have not been implemented as of the date hereof. In 2014, ERCOT implemented the Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC), pursuant to which wholesale electricity prices in the real-time electricity market increase automatically as available operating reserves decrease below defined threshold levels, creating a price adder. The slope of the ORDC curve is determined through a mathematical loss of load probability calculation using forecasted reserves and historical data. In both March 2019 and March 2020, ERCOT implemented 0.25 standard deviation shifts in the loss of load probability calculation and moved to using a single blended ORDC curve; these changes resulted in a more rapid escalation in power prices as operating reserves fall below defined thresholds. Effective January 1, 2022, when operating reserves drop to 3,000 MW or less, the ORDC automatically adjusts power prices to $5,000/MWh which is equal to the high system-wide offer cap. ERCOT also calculates the "peaker net margin" based on revenues a hypothetical unhedged peaking unit would collect in the market. If the peaker net margin exceeds a certain threshold, the system-wide offer cap is reduced to the low system-wide offer cap of $2,000/MWh for the remainder of the calendar year. In December 2023, the PUCT also approved an Emergency Pricing Program that temporarily lowers the system-wide offer cap to $2,000/MWh if prices have been at the cap for 12 hours in a rolling 24-hour period. Historically, high demand due to elevated temperatures in the summer months or high demand due to reduced temperatures in the winter months, combined with underperformance of wind generation, has created the conditions during which the ORDC contributes meaningfully to power prices. Extreme weather conditions can also lead to scarcity conditions regardless of season. Other than during periods of "scarcity pricing," the price of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance).

3

Table of Contents
Transactions in ERCOT take place in two key markets: the day-ahead market and the real-time market. The day-ahead market is a voluntary, financial electricity market conducted the day before each operating day in which generators and purchasers of electricity may bid for one or more hours of electricity supply or consumption. The real-time market is a physical market in which electricity is dispatched and priced in five-minute intervals. The day-ahead market provides market participants with visibility into where prices are expected to clear, and the prices are not impacted by subsequent events. Conversely, the real-time market exposes purchasers to the risk of transient operational events and price spikes. These two markets allow market participants to manage their risk profile by adjusting their participation in each market. In addition, ERCOT uses ancillary services to maintain system reliability, including regulation service, responsive reserve service and non-spinning reserve service. Ancillary services are provided by generators and qualified loads to help maintain the stable voltage and frequency requirements of the transmission system. ERCOT currently procures ancillary services in the day-ahead market, but plans to implement co-optimization of energy and ancillary services in the real-time market in 2026. Because ERCOT has one of the highest concentrations of wind and solar capacity generation among U.S. markets, the ERCOT market is more susceptible to fluctuations in wholesale electricity supply due to intermittent wind and solar production, making ERCOT more vulnerable to periods of generation scarcity. Beginning in July 2021, ERCOT has increased its ancillary service procurement volumes to maintain a more conservative level of operating reserves. ERCOT implemented the ERCOT Contingency Reserve Service (ECRS) in June 2023 to further address the need for operating reserves to manage load and intermittent resource output uncertainty. The Texas legislature has also directed the creation of a new ancillary service, Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service, that is currently projected to be implemented in 2026.

PJM — PJM is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 183,000 MW of generation capacity to approximately 65 million customers in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.

Like ERCOT, PJM administers markets for wholesale electricity and provides transmission planning for the region, utilizing a locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology which calculates a price for every generator and load point within PJM. PJM operates day-ahead and real-time markets into which generators can bid to provide energy and ancillary services. PJM also administers a forward capacity auction, the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM), which establishes a long-term market for capacity. We have participated in RPM auctions for years up to and including PJM's planning year 2024-2025, which ends May 31, 2025. PJM's RPM auction for planning year 2025-2026 was delayed and is expected to be run in June 2024. We also enter into bilateral capacity transactions. PJM's Capacity Performance (CP) rules were designed to improve system reliability and include penalties for under-performing units and reward for over-performing units during shortage events. Full transition of the capacity market to CP rules occurred in planning year 2020-2021. An independent market monitor continually monitors PJM markets to ensure a robust, competitive market and to identify improper behavior by any entity.

ISO-NE — ISO-NE is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 32,400 MW of winter generation capacity to approximately 15 million customers in the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine.

ISO-NE dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the locations in ISO-NE and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. ISO-NE offers the Forward Capacity Market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Performance incentive rules have the potential to increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

NYISO — NYISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 37,000 MW of installed summer generation capacity to approximately 20 million New York customers.

NYISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in the NYISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. NYISO offers the Installed Capacity Market, a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Strip auctions occur one to two months prior to the commencement of a six-month seasonal planning period. Subsequent auctions provide an opportunity to sell excess capacity for the balance of the seasonal planning period or the upcoming month. Due to the short-term nature of the NYISO-operated capacity auctions and a relatively liquid bilateral market for NYISO capacity products, our Independence facility sells a significant portion of its capacity through bilateral transactions. The balance is cleared through the seasonal and monthly capacity auctions.

4

Table of Contents
CAISO— CAISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity to approximately 32 million customers primarily in California, representing approximately 80% percent of the state's electric load.

Energy is priced in CAISO utilizing an LMP methodology. The capacity market is comprised of Generic, Flexible and Local Resource Adequacy (RA) Capacity and is administered by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Unlike other centrally cleared capacity markets, the resource adequacy markets in California are primarily bilaterally traded markets. In 2020, the CPUC introduced a central procurement entity for Local RA Capacity effective for the 2023 compliance year. The central procurement entity runs a pay-as-bid auction for Local RA Capacity. In November 2016, CAISO implemented a voluntary capacity auction for annual, monthly, and intra-month procurement to cover for deficiencies in the market. The voluntary Competitive Solicitation Process, which FERC approved in October 2015, is a modification to the Capacity Procurement Mechanism (CPM) and provides another avenue to sell RA capacity.

MISO — MISO is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 190,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 45 million customers in all or parts of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota and Manitoba, Canada.

MISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in MISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. An independent market monitor is responsible for evaluating the performance of the markets and identifying conduct by market participants or MISO that may compromise the efficiency or distort the outcome of the markets.

MISO administers a one-year Planning Resource Auction for the next planning year from June 1st of the current year to May 31st of the following year. In 2022, FERC approved MISO's proposal to change the annual Planning Resource Auction into a seasonal auction, effective for the 2023-2024 planning year. We participate in these auctions with open capacity that has not been committed through bilateral or retail transactions. We also participate in the MISO annual and monthly financial transmission rights auctions to manage the cost of our transmission congestion, as measured by the congestion component of the LMP price differential between two points on the transmission grid across the market area.

Wholesale Operations — Our wholesale commodity risk management group is responsible for dispatching our generation fleet in response to market needs after implementing portfolio optimization strategies, thus linking and integrating the generation fleet production with our retail customer and wholesale sales opportunities. Market demand, also known as load, faced by electric power systems, such as those we operate in, varies from moment to moment as a result of changes in business and residential demand, which is often driven by weather. Unlike most other commodities, the production and consumption of electricity must remain balanced on an instantaneous basis. There is a certain baseline demand for electricity across an electric power system that occurs throughout the day, which is typically satisfied by baseload generation units with low variable operating costs. Baseload generation units can also increase output to satisfy certain incremental demand and reduce output when demand is unusually low. Intermediate/load-following generation units, which can more efficiently change their output to satisfy increases in demand, typically satisfy a large proportion of changes in intraday load as they respond to daily increases in demand or unexpected changes in supply created by reduced generation from renewable resources or other generator outages. Peak daily loads may be satisfied by peaking units. Peaking units are typically the most expensive to operate, but they can quickly start up and shut down to meet brief peaks in demand. In general, baseload units, intermediate/load following units and peaking units are dispatched into the ISO/RTO grid in order from lowest to highest variable cost. Price formation is typically based on the highest variable cost unit that clears the market to satisfy system demand at a given point in time.

Our commodity risk management group also enters into electricity, natural gas and other commodity derivative contracts to reduce exposure to changes in prices primarily to mitigate the volatility of future revenues and fuel costs for our generation facilities and purchased power costs for our Retail segment.

Seasonality

The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make, such fluctuations more pronounced. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.

5

Table of Contents
Competition

Competition in the markets in which we operate is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, congestion along the power grid, subsidies provided by state and federal governments for new and existing generation facilities, including renewables generation and battery ESS, new market entrants, construction of new generation assets, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities, and other factors. We primarily compete with other electricity generators and retailers based on our ability to generate electric supply, market and sell electricity at competitive prices and to efficiently utilize transportation from third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities to deliver electricity to end-users. Competitors in the generation and retail power markets in which we participate include numerous regulated utilities, industrial companies, non-utility generators, competitive subsidiaries of regulated utilities, independent power producers, REPs and other energy marketers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information concerning the risks faced with respect to the markets in which we operate.

Business StrategyMarket Discussion

The operations of Vistra, as an integrated retail electricity and power generation company, are further aligned into six reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East, (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. Our Texas, East, West and Sunset segments include our electricity generation operations, and our Asset Closure segment is engaged in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines.

Retail Operations

Vistra is one of the largest competitive residential retail electricity providers in the U.S. Our Retail operations are engaged in retail sales of electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 4 million customers. Substantially all of our retail activities are conducted by TXU Energy, Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Our business strategy isTXU Energy brand, which has been used to deliver long-term stakeholder value through a focus on the following areas:

Integrated business model. We believe the key factor that distinguishes us from otherssell electricity to customers in the competitive retail electricity industrymarket in Texas for approximately 20 years, is registered and protected by trademark law and is the integrated nature of our business (i.e., pairing our reliable and efficient mining, diversified generation fleet and wholesale commodity risk management capabilities with our retail platform). Our business strategy is guided by our integrated business model because we believe it is our core competitive advantage and differentiates us from our non-integrated competitors by reducing the effects of commodity price movements and contributing to earnings and cash flow stability. Consequently, our integrated business model is at the core of our business strategy.

Growth and transformation. Vistra's strategy is to grow our business through prudent investments in attractive retail, renewable, and energy storage assets while reducing our carbon footprint and creating a more sustainable company with enduring long-term value for our stakeholders. We expect to meaningfully transform our generation portfolio over the next decade by growing our portfolio of zero-carbon resources, including solar and energy storage, through our Vistra Zero brand and by retiring approximately 7,000 MWs of coal assets between now and year-end 2027. We believe our long-termonly material intellectual property asset mix will support electric system reliability while providing customers with cost-effective energy that meets their sustainable preferences. Our growth strategy leverages our core capabilities of multi-channel retail marketing in large and competitive markets, operating large-scale, environmentally sensitive, and diverse assets across a variety of fuel technologies, fuel logistics and management, commodity risk management, cost control, and energy infrastructure investing. We intend to opportunistically evaluate the acquisition and development of high-quality energy infrastructure assets and businesses, including renewable energy and battery storage assets as well as retail businesses, that complement our core capabilities and enable us to achieve operational or financial synergies. While we are intent on growing our business and creating value for our stockholders, we are committed to making disciplined investments that are consistent with our focus on maintaining a strong balance sheet and strong liquidity profile. As a result, consistent with our disciplined capital allocation approval process, growth opportunities we pursue must have compelling economic value and align with or enhance our business strategy.

Disciplined capital allocation. Vistra takes a balanced approach to capital allocation, focusing on maintaining a strong balance sheet, investing prudently in the maintenance of our existing assets and potential growth acquisitions, and returning capital to stockholders. A strong balance sheet helps to ensure Vistra's interest expense is manageable in a variety of wholesale power price environments while giving Vistra access to flexible and diverse sources of liquidity. We prudently make necessary capital investments to maintain the safety and reliability of our facilities while also investing in new technologies when economic, including solar assets and battery storage systems, resulting in a continued modernization of Vistra's generation fleet. Because we believe cost discipline and strong management of our assets and commodity positions are necessary to deliver long-term value to our stakeholders, we generally make capital allocation decisions that we believe will lead to attractive cash returns on investment, including by returning capital to our stockholders through quarterly dividends and our share repurchase program (see Note 14 toown. We have also acquired the Financial Statements).

Superior customer service. Through our retail brands, including TXU Energy,trade names for Ambit Energy, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric through the Ambit Transaction, Crius Transaction and the Dynegy Merger, as the case may be. As of December 31, 2023, we servehave reflected intangible assets on our balance sheet for our trade names of approximately $1.341 billion (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).

The largest portion of our retail operations are in Texas, where we provide retail electricity to approximately 2.5 million customers. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves by providing a distinctive customer experience predicated on delivering reliable and natural gas needs of end-use residential, small business, commercial and industrial electricity customers through multiple sales and marketing channels. In addition to benefitting from our integrated business model, we leverage our brands, our commitment to a consistent and reliable product offering, the backstop of the electricity generated by our generation fleet, our wholesale commodity risk management operations and our strong customer service to differentiate ourinnovative power products and services fromsolutions to our competitors. We strive to be at the forefront of innovation with new offerings and customer experiences to reinforce our value proposition. We maintain a focus on solutions thatcustomers, which give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services. Our retail business also offers a comprehensive suite of green products and services, including TXU Energy's Free Nights100% wind and Solar Days residential plans, MyEnergy Dashboardsolar options, as well as thermostats, dashboards and other programs designed to encourage reduced consumption and increased energy efficiency.

1

Table of Contents
Electricity Generation Operations

Vistra is the largest competitive power generator in the U.S. as measured by MWh. At December 31, 2023, our generating capacity was powered by the following:
Primary FuelTechnologyNet Capacity (MW)% of Net Capacity
Natural GasCCGT, CT or ST24,313 66%
CoalST8,428 23%
NuclearNuclear2,400 7%
RenewableSolar/Battery1,358 4%
Fuel OilCT203 —%
Total36,702 100%

Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 23 CCGT generation facilities totaling 19,512 MW and 11 peaking generation facilities totaling 4,801 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements and natural gas storage agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.

Our coal/lignite-fueled generation fleet is comprised of seven generation facilities totaling 8,428 MW of generation capacity. Maintenance outages at these units are scheduled during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. We meet our fuel requirements at our coal-fueled generation facilities in PJM and MISO with coal purchased from multiple suppliers under contracts of various lengths and transported to the facilities by either railcar or barges. We meet our fuel requirements in ERCOT using lignite that we mine at the Oak Grove generation facility and coal purchased and transported by railcar at the Coleto Creek and Martin Lake generation facilities.

We own and operate two nuclear generation units at the Comanche Peak plant site in ERCOT, each of which is designed for a capacity of 1,200 MW. Comanche Peak Unit 1 and Unit 2 went into commercial operation in 1990 and 1993, respectively, and are generally operated at full capacity. Refueling (nuclear fuel assembly replacement) outages for each unit are scheduled to occur every eighteen months during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. Every three years, the refueling cycle results in the refueling of both units during the same year, which occurred in 2023. While one unit is undergoing a refueling outage, the remaining unit is intended to operate at full capacity. During a refueling outage, other maintenance, modification and testing activities are completed that cannot be accomplished when the unit is in operation. The Comanche Peak facility operated at a capacity factor of 90%, 94% and 96% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

We have contracts in place for all of Comanche Peak's 2024 through 2027 nuclear fuel requirements. We do not anticipate any significant difficulties in acquiring uranium and contracting for associated conversion, enrichment and fabrication services in the foreseeable future, but we are closely monitoring developments that may arise out of the Russia and Ukraine conflict. See Item 7. SM, TXU Energy's iThermostat productManagement's Discussion and mobile solution, the TXU Energy Rewards program, the TXU Energy Green UpSMAnalysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance renewable energy credit program and a diverse set of solar options. – Macroeconomic Conditions.

Our focus on superior customer service will guide our efforts to acquire new residential and commercial customers, serve and retain existing customers and maintain valuable sales channels for our electricity generation resources. We believe our customer service, products and trusted brands will resultoperations by segment are represented in high residential customer retention rates, particularly in Texas where our TXU Energy brand has maintained its residential customers in a highly competitive retail market.the following table:
SegmentNet Capacity (MW)% of Net CapacityISO/RTO
Texas18,151 49%ERCOT
East12,093 33%PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO
West1,880 5%CAISO
Sunset4,578 13%MISO, PJM and ERCOT
Total36,702 100%

2

Table of Contents
Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs)Excellence — Separate from our operations, ISOs/RTOs administer the transmission infrastructure and markets across a regional footprint in operations while maintaining an efficient cost structure. We believe that operating ourmost of the markets in which we operate. They are responsible for dispatching all generation facilities in a safe,their respective footprints and are responsible for both maximum utilization and reliable environmentally compliant, and cost-effective and efficient manner is a foundation for delivering long-term stakeholder value. We also believe stakeholder value is increased as a result of making disciplined investments that enable our generation facilities to operate not only effectively and efficiently, but also safely, reliably and in an environmentally compliant manner. We believe that an ongoing focus on operational excellence and safety is a key component to success in a highly competitive environment and is partoperation of the unique value propositiontransmission system. ISOs/RTOs administer energy and ancillary service markets in the short term, which usually consists of our integrated model. Additionally, we are committed to optimizing our cost structure, reducing our debt levelsday-ahead and implementing enterprise-wide processreal-time markets. Several ISOs/RTOs also ensure long-term planning reserves through monthly, semiannual, annual and operating improvements without compromisingmulti-year capacity markets. The ISOs/RTOs that oversee most of the safety of our communities, customers and employees. We believe we have a highly effective and efficient cost structure and that our cost structure supports excellence in our operations.

Integrated hedging and commercial management. Our commercial team is focused on managing risk, through opportunistic hedging, and optimizing our assets and business positions. We actively seek to manage our exposure to wholesale electricity prices inpower markets in which we operate currently impose, and will likely continue to impose, bid and price limits or other similar mechanisms. NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs often have different geographic footprints, and while there may be geographic overlap between NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs, their respective roles and responsibilities do not generally overlap.

In ISO/RTO regions with centrally dispatched market structures (e.g., ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO, and CAISO), all generators selling into the centralized market receive the same price for energy sold based on the bid price associated with the production of the last MWh that is needed to balance supply with demand within a designated zone or at a given location. Different zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO may produce different prices respective to other zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO due to transmission losses and congestion. For example, a less efficient and/or less economical natural gas-fueled unit may be needed in some hours to meet demand. If this unit's production is required to meet demand on the margin, its offer price will set the market clearing price for all dispatched generation in the same market (although the price paid at other zones or locations may vary because of transmission losses and congestion), regardless of the price that any other unit may have offered into the market. Generators will receive the location-based marginal price for their output.

ERCOT — ERCOT is an integrated basis, through contracts for physical deliveryISO that manages the flow of electricity exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial contracts, term, day-ahead and real-time market transactions, and bilateral contracts with other wholesale market participants, including other power generators and end-user electricity customers. We seekfrom approximately 98,000 MW of expected Summer 2023 peak generation capacity to hedge near-term cash flows and optimize long term value through hedging and forward sales contracts. We believe our integrated hedging and commercial management strategy, in combination with a strong balance sheet and strong liquidity profile, will provide a long-term advantage through cyclesapproximately 26 million Texas customers, representing approximately 90% of higher and lower commodity prices.the state's electric load.

Corporate responsibilityAs an energy-only market, ERCOT's market design is distinct from other competitive electricity markets in the U.S. Other markets maintain a minimum planning reserve margin through regulated planning, resource adequacy requirements and/or capacity markets. In contrast, ERCOT's resource adequacy is currently predominately dependent on energy-market price signals. The PUCT has voted to recommend a Performance Credit Mechanism (PCM) that would align a required reliability standard with resource availability during higher-risk system conditions in a centrally-cleared market. These changes are currently being evaluated by the PUCT and citizenship. We are committedERCOT and have not been implemented as of the date hereof. In 2014, ERCOT implemented the Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC), pursuant to providing safe, reliable, cost-effectivewhich wholesale electricity prices in the real-time electricity market increase automatically as available operating reserves decrease below defined threshold levels, creating a price adder. The slope of the ORDC curve is determined through a mathematical loss of load probability calculation using forecasted reserves and environmentally compliant electricityhistorical data. In both March 2019 and March 2020, ERCOT implemented 0.25 standard deviation shifts in the loss of load probability calculation and moved to using a single blended ORDC curve; these changes resulted in a more rapid escalation in power prices as operating reserves fall below defined thresholds. Effective January 1, 2022, when operating reserves drop to 3,000 MW or less, the ORDC automatically adjusts power prices to $5,000/MWh which is equal to the high system-wide offer cap. ERCOT also calculates the "peaker net margin" based on revenues a hypothetical unhedged peaking unit would collect in the market. If the peaker net margin exceeds a certain threshold, the system-wide offer cap is reduced to the low system-wide offer cap of $2,000/MWh for the communities and customers we serve. We striveremainder of the calendar year. In December 2023, the PUCT also approved an Emergency Pricing Program that temporarily lowers the system-wide offer cap to improve$2,000/MWh if prices have been at the quality of lifecap for 12 hours in a rolling 24-hour period. Historically, high demand due to elevated temperatures in the communities in which we operate. We are also committedsummer months or high demand due to being a good corporate citizenreduced temperatures in the communities inwinter months, combined with underperformance of wind generation, has created the conditions during which we conduct operations. Wethe ORDC contributes meaningfully to power prices. Extreme weather conditions can also lead to scarcity conditions regardless of season. Other than during periods of "scarcity pricing," the price of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and our employees are actively engaged in programs intended to supportAnalysis of Financial Condition, and strengthen the communities in which we conduct operations. Our foremost giving initiatives are through the United Way, TXU Energy AidResults of Operations – Significant Activities and Ambit Cares campaigns. TXU Energy Aid serves as an integral resource for social service agencies that assist those in need across Texas pay their electricity bills. Ambit Cares partners with Feeding America® to assist those in need across the U.S. by fighting hunger through a network of food banks.

Recent Developments

Dividend DeclarationEvents, and Items Influencing Future Performance — In February 2021, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share that will be paid in March 2021.

Change in Principal Financial Officer — In December 2020, James A. Burke, who previously served as the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, was elected as President and Chief Financial Officer and assumed the duties of serving as the Company's Principal Financial Officer following the resignation of David A. Campbell from his roles as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company.

Share Repurchase Program — In September 2020, we announced that the Board authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $1.5 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program became effective January 1, 2021, at which time the prior share repurchase plan and all authorized amounts remaining thereunder terminated as of such date. From January 1, 2021 through February 23, 2021, 5,902,720 shares of our common stock had been repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program for $125 million. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.).

3

Table of Contents
Transactions in ERCOT take place in two key markets: the day-ahead market and the real-time market. The day-ahead market is a voluntary, financial electricity market conducted the day before each operating day in which generators and purchasers of electricity may bid for one or more hours of electricity supply or consumption. The real-time market is a physical market in which electricity is dispatched and priced in five-minute intervals. The day-ahead market provides market participants with visibility into where prices are expected to clear, and the prices are not impacted by subsequent events. Conversely, the real-time market exposes purchasers to the risk of transient operational events and price spikes. These two markets allow market participants to manage their risk profile by adjusting their participation in each market. In addition, ERCOT uses ancillary services to maintain system reliability, including regulation service, responsive reserve service and non-spinning reserve service. Ancillary services are provided by generators and qualified loads to help maintain the stable voltage and frequency requirements of the transmission system. ERCOT currently procures ancillary services in the day-ahead market, but plans to implement co-optimization of energy and ancillary services in the real-time market in 2026. Because ERCOT has one of the highest concentrations of wind and solar capacity generation among U.S. markets, the ERCOT market is more susceptible to fluctuations in wholesale electricity supply due to intermittent wind and solar production, making ERCOT more vulnerable to periods of generation scarcity. Beginning in July 2021, ERCOT has increased its ancillary service procurement volumes to maintain a more conservative level of operating reserves. ERCOT implemented the ERCOT Contingency Reserve Service (ECRS) in June 2023 to further address the need for operating reserves to manage load and intermittent resource output uncertainty. The Texas legislature has also directed the creation of a new ancillary service, Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service, that is currently projected to be implemented in 2026.

PJM — PJM is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 183,000 MW of generation capacity to approximately 65 million customers in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.

Like ERCOT, PJM administers markets for wholesale electricity and provides transmission planning for the region, utilizing a locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology which calculates a price for every generator and load point within PJM. PJM operates day-ahead and real-time markets into which generators can bid to provide energy and ancillary services. PJM also administers a forward capacity auction, the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM), which establishes a long-term market for capacity. We have participated in RPM auctions for years up to and including PJM's planning year 2024-2025, which ends May 31, 2025. PJM's RPM auction for planning year 2025-2026 was delayed and is expected to be run in June 2024. We also enter into bilateral capacity transactions. PJM's Capacity Performance (CP) rules were designed to improve system reliability and include penalties for under-performing units and reward for over-performing units during shortage events. Full transition of the capacity market to CP rules occurred in planning year 2020-2021. An independent market monitor continually monitors PJM markets to ensure a robust, competitive market and to identify improper behavior by any entity.

ISO-NE — ISO-NE is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 32,400 MW of winter generation capacity to approximately 15 million customers in the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine.

ISO-NE dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the locations in ISO-NE and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. ISO-NE offers the Forward Capacity Market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Performance incentive rules have the potential to increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

NYISO — NYISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 37,000 MW of installed summer generation capacity to approximately 20 million New York customers.

NYISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in the NYISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. NYISO offers the Installed Capacity Market, a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Strip auctions occur one to two months prior to the commencement of a six-month seasonal planning period. Subsequent auctions provide an opportunity to sell excess capacity for the balance of the seasonal planning period or the upcoming month. Due to the short-term nature of the NYISO-operated capacity auctions and a relatively liquid bilateral market for NYISO capacity products, our Independence facility sells a significant portion of its capacity through bilateral transactions. The balance is cleared through the seasonal and monthly capacity auctions.

4

Table of Contents
CAISO— CAISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity to approximately 32 million customers primarily in California, representing approximately 80% percent of the state's electric load.

Energy is priced in CAISO utilizing an LMP methodology. The capacity market is comprised of Generic, Flexible and Local Resource Adequacy (RA) Capacity and is administered by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Unlike other centrally cleared capacity markets, the resource adequacy markets in California are primarily bilaterally traded markets. In 2020, the CPUC introduced a central procurement entity for Local RA Capacity effective for the 2023 compliance year. The central procurement entity runs a pay-as-bid auction for Local RA Capacity. In November 2016, CAISO implemented a voluntary capacity auction for annual, monthly, and intra-month procurement to cover for deficiencies in the market. The voluntary Competitive Solicitation Process, which FERC approved in October 2015, is a modification to the Capacity Procurement Mechanism (CPM) and provides another avenue to sell RA capacity.

MISO — MISO is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 190,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 45 million customers in all or parts of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota and Manitoba, Canada.

MISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in MISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. An independent market monitor is responsible for evaluating the performance of the markets and identifying conduct by market participants or MISO that may compromise the efficiency or distort the outcome of the markets.

MISO administers a one-year Planning Resource Auction for the next planning year from June 1st of the current year to May 31st of the following year. In 2022, FERC approved MISO's proposal to change the annual Planning Resource Auction into a seasonal auction, effective for the 2023-2024 planning year. We participate in these auctions with open capacity that has not been committed through bilateral or retail transactions. We also participate in the MISO annual and monthly financial transmission rights auctions to manage the cost of our transmission congestion, as measured by the congestion component of the LMP price differential between two points on the transmission grid across the market area.

Wholesale Operations — Our wholesale commodity risk management group is responsible for dispatching our generation fleet in response to market needs after implementing portfolio optimization strategies, thus linking and integrating the generation fleet production with our retail customer and wholesale sales opportunities. Market demand, also known as load, faced by electric power systems, such as those we operate in, varies from moment to moment as a result of changes in business and residential demand, which is often driven by weather. Unlike most other commodities, the production and consumption of electricity must remain balanced on an instantaneous basis. There is a certain baseline demand for electricity across an electric power system that occurs throughout the day, which is typically satisfied by baseload generation units with low variable operating costs. Baseload generation units can also increase output to satisfy certain incremental demand and reduce output when demand is unusually low. Intermediate/load-following generation units, which can more efficiently change their output to satisfy increases in demand, typically satisfy a large proportion of changes in intraday load as they respond to daily increases in demand or unexpected changes in supply created by reduced generation from renewable resources or other generator outages. Peak daily loads may be satisfied by peaking units. Peaking units are typically the most expensive to operate, but they can quickly start up and shut down to meet brief peaks in demand. In general, baseload units, intermediate/load following units and peaking units are dispatched into the ISO/RTO grid in order from lowest to highest variable cost. Price formation is typically based on the highest variable cost unit that clears the market to satisfy system demand at a given point in time.

Our commodity risk management group also enters into electricity, natural gas and other commodity derivative contracts to reduce exposure to changes in prices primarily to mitigate the volatility of future revenues and fuel costs for our generation facilities and purchased power costs for our Retail segment.

Seasonality

The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make, such fluctuations more pronounced. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.

5

Table of Contents
Competition

Competition in the markets in which we operate is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, congestion along the power grid, subsidies provided by state and federal governments for new and existing generation facilities, including renewables generation and battery ESS, new market entrants, construction of new generation assets, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities, and other factors. We primarily compete with other electricity generators and retailers based on our ability to generate electric supply, market and sell electricity at competitive prices and to efficiently utilize transportation from third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities to deliver electricity to end-users. Competitors in the generation and retail power markets in which we participate include numerous regulated utilities, industrial companies, non-utility generators, competitive subsidiaries of regulated utilities, independent power producers, REPs and other energy marketers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information concerning the risks faced with respect to the markets in which we operate.

Market Discussion

The operations of Vistra, as an integrated retail electricity and power generation company, are further aligned into six reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East, (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. InOur Texas, East, West and Sunset segments include our electricity generation operations, and our Asset Closure segment is engaged in the third quarterdecommissioning and reclamation of 2020, retired plants and mines.

Retail Operations

Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's CODM makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The following is a summaryone of the updated segments:largest competitive residential retail electricity providers in the U.S. Our Retail operations are engaged in retail sales of electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 4 million customers. Substantially all of our retail activities are conducted by TXU Energy, Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

Our TXU Energy brand, which has been used to sell electricity to customers in the competitive retail electricity market in Texas for approximately 20 years, is registered and protected by trademark law and is the only material intellectual property asset that we own. We have also acquired the trade names for Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric through the Ambit Transaction, Crius Transaction and the Dynegy Merger, as the case may be. As of December 31, 2023, we have reflected intangible assets on our balance sheet for our trade names of approximately $1.341 billion (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).

The largest portion of our retail operations are in Texas, where we provide retail electricity to approximately 2.5 million customers. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves by providing a distinctive customer experience predicated on delivering reliable and innovative power products and solutions to our customers, which give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services. Our retail business also offers a comprehensive suite of green products and services, including 100% wind and solar options, as well as thermostats, dashboards and other programs designed to encourage reduced consumption and increased energy efficiency.

1

Table of Contents
Electricity Generation Operations

Vistra is the largest competitive power generator in the U.S. as measured by MWh. At December 31, 2023, our generating capacity was powered by the following:
Primary FuelTechnologyNet Capacity (MW)% of Net Capacity
Natural GasCCGT, CT or ST24,313 66%
CoalST8,428 23%
NuclearNuclear2,400 7%
RenewableSolar/Battery1,358 4%
Fuel OilCT203 —%
Total36,702 100%

Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 23 CCGT generation facilities totaling 19,512 MW and 11 peaking generation facilities totaling 4,801 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements and natural gas storage agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.

Our coal/lignite-fueled generation fleet is comprised of seven generation facilities totaling 8,428 MW of generation capacity. Maintenance outages at these units are scheduled during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. We meet our fuel requirements at our coal-fueled generation facilities in PJM and MISO with coal purchased from multiple suppliers under contracts of various lengths and transported to the facilities by either railcar or barges. We meet our fuel requirements in ERCOT using lignite that we mine at the Oak Grove generation facility and coal purchased and transported by railcar at the Coleto Creek and Martin Lake generation facilities.

We own and operate two nuclear generation units at the Comanche Peak plant site in ERCOT, each of which is designed for a capacity of 1,200 MW. Comanche Peak Unit 1 and Unit 2 went into commercial operation in 1990 and 1993, respectively, and are generally operated at full capacity. Refueling (nuclear fuel assembly replacement) outages for each unit are scheduled to occur every eighteen months during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. Every three years, the refueling cycle results in the refueling of both units during the same year, which occurred in 2023. While one unit is undergoing a refueling outage, the remaining unit is intended to operate at full capacity. During a refueling outage, other maintenance, modification and testing activities are completed that cannot be accomplished when the unit is in operation. The Comanche Peak facility operated at a capacity factor of 90%, 94% and 96% in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reportedWe have contracts in place for all of Comanche Peak's 2024 through 2027 nuclear fuel requirements. We do not anticipate any significant difficulties in acquiring uranium and contracting for associated conversion, enrichment and fabrication services in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments. Asforeseeable future, but we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes it is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnectionare closely monitoring developments that may arise out of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now partRussia and Ukraine conflict. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, respectively,Financial Condition, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NEResults of Operations – Significant Activities and NYISO that were previously reported in the PJMEvents, and NY/NE segments, respectively.
Items Influencing Future PerformanceThe West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and was previously reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), the Company expects to expand its operations in the West segment.– Macroeconomic Conditions.

In addition,Our generation operations by segment are represented in the ERCOT segment was renamed the Texas segment. There were no changes to the Retail and Asset Closure segments. All historical segment results within these consolidated financial statements have been recast to be in alignment with our new segmentation. See Note 20 to the Financial Statements for further information concerning reportable segments.following table:
SegmentNet Capacity (MW)% of Net CapacityISO/RTO
Texas18,151 49%ERCOT
East12,093 33%PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO
West1,880 5%CAISO
Sunset4,578 13%MISO, PJM and ERCOT
Total36,702 100%

2

Table of Contents
Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs)

Separately, — Separate from our operations, ISOs/RTOs administer the transmission infrastructure and markets across a regional footprint in most of the markets in which we operate. They are responsible for dispatching all generation facilities in their respective footprints and are responsible for both maximum utilization and reliable and efficient operation of the transmission system. ISOs/RTOs administer energy and ancillary service markets in the short term, which usually consists of day-ahead and real-time markets. Several ISOs/RTOs also ensure long-term planning reserves through monthly, semiannual, annual and multi-year capacity markets. The ISOs/RTOs that oversee most of the wholesale power markets in which we operate currently impose, and will likely continue to impose, bid and price limits or other similar mechanisms. NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs often have different geographic footprints, and while there may be geographic overlap between NERC regions and ISOs/RTOs, their respective roles and responsibilities do not generally overlap.

In ISO/RTO regions with centrally dispatched market structures (e.g., ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO, and CAISO), all generators selling into the centralized market receive the same price for energy sold based on the bid price associated with the production of the last MWh that is needed to balance supply with demand within a designated zone or at a given location. Different zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO may produce different prices respective to other zones or locations within the same ISO/RTO due to transmission losses and congestion. For example, a less efficient and/or less economical natural gas-fueled unit may be needed in some hours to meet demand. If this unit's production is required to meet demand on the margin, its offer price will set the market clearing price that will be paid for all dispatched generation in the same zone or locationmarket (although the price paid at other zones or locations may vary because of transmission losses and congestion), regardless of the price that any other unit may have offered into the market. Generators will receive the location-based marginal price for their output.

Retail Markets

The Retail segment is engaged in retail sales of electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 4.5 million customers. Substantially all of these activities are conducted by TXU Energy, Ambit Energy, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

4

Table of Contents
The largest portion of our retail operations are in Texas, where we provide retail electricity to approximately 2.4 million customers in ERCOT. We are an active participant in the competitive ERCOT retail market and continue to be a market leader, which we believe is driven by, among other things, strong brands, innovative products and services and excellent customer service. As of December 31, 2020, we provided electricity to approximately 31% of the residential customers in ERCOT and for approximately 15% of business customers' demand. We believe that we have differentiated ourselves by providing a distinctive customer experience predicated on delivering reliable and innovative power products and solutions to our customers, which give our customers choice, convenience and control over how and when they use electricity and related services. Our retail business also offers a comprehensive suite of green products and services, including 100% wind and solar options, as well as thermostats, dashboards and other programs designed to encourage reduced consumption and increased energy efficiency.

Our integrated power generation and wholesale operation allows us to efficiently obtain the electricity needed to serve our customers at the lowest cost. The integrated model enables us to structure products and contracts in a way that offers significant value compared to stand-alone retail electric providers. Additionally, our wholesale commodity risk management operations protect our retail business from power price volatility by allowing us to bypass bid-ask spread in the market (particularly for illiquid products and time periods) and achieve lower collateral costs for our retail business as compared to other, non-integrated retail electric providers. Moreover, our retail business reduces, to some extent, the exposure of our wholesale generation business to wholesale power price volatility. This is because the retail load requirements of our retail operations provide a natural offset to the length of Luminant's generation portfolio thereby reducing the exposure to wholesale power price volatility as compared to a non-integrated independent power producer.

Outside of ERCOT, we also serve residential, municipal, commercial and industrial customers substantially through our Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Public Power, U.S. Gas & Electric and Ambit Energy retail businesses, through which we provide retail electricity, natural gas and related services to approximately 2.1 million customers in 18 states and the District of Columbia.

Texas Segment

Our Texas segment is comprised of 18 power generation facilities totaling 17,623 MW of generation capacity in ERCOT. We also operate a 10 MW battery energy storage system (ESS) at our Upton 2 solar facility. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of 668 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and 260 MW of battery ESS in Texas with estimated commercial operation dates between the summer of 2021 and the fall of 2022. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for a summary of our solar and battery energy storage projects.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
ERCOTCCGTNatural Gas77,838 
ERCOTSTCoal23,850 
ERCOTCT or STNatural Gas73,455 
ERCOTNuclearNuclear12,300 
ERCOTSolar/BatteryRenewable1180 
Total Texas Segment1817,623 

ERCOT — ERCOT is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 86,00098,000 MW of installedexpected Summer 2023 peak generation capacity to approximately 26 million Texas customers, representing approximately 90% of the state's electric load.

5

Table of Contents
As an energy-only market, ERCOT's market design is distinct from other competitive electricity markets in the U.S. Other markets maintain a minimum planning reserve margin through regulated planning, resource adequacy requirements and/or capacity markets. In contrast, ERCOT's resource adequacy is currently predominately dependent on energy-market price signals. The PUCT has voted to recommend a Performance Credit Mechanism (PCM) that would align a required reliability standard with resource availability during higher-risk system conditions in a centrally-cleared market. These changes are currently being evaluated by the PUCT and ERCOT and have not been implemented as of the date hereof. In 2014, ERCOT implemented the Operating Reserve Demand Curve (ORDC), pursuant to which wholesale electricity prices in the real-time electricity market increase automatically as available operating reserves decrease below defined threshold levels, creating a price adder. When operating reserves drop to 2,000 MW or less,The slope of the ORDC automatically adjusts power prices to the established valuecurve is determined through a mathematical loss of lost load (VOLL), which is set at $9,000/MWh which is equal to the system-wide offer cap.probability calculation using forecasted reserves and historical data. In both March 2019 and March 2020, ERCOT implemented 0.25 standard deviation shifts in the loss of load probability calculation and moved to using a single blended ORDC curve; these changes resulted in a more rapid escalation in power prices as operating reserves fall below defined thresholds. Effective January 1, 2022, when operating reserves drop to 3,000 MW or less, the ORDC automatically adjusts power prices to $5,000/MWh which is equal to the high system-wide offer cap. ERCOT also calculates the "peaker net margin" based on revenues a hypothetical unhedged peaking unit would collect in the market. If the peaker net margin exceeds a certain threshold, the system-wide offer cap is reduced to the low system-wide offer cap of $2,000/MWh for the remainder of the calendar year. In December 2023, the PUCT also approved an Emergency Pricing Program that temporarily lowers the system-wide offer cap to $2,000/MWh if prices have been at the cap for 12 hours in a rolling 24-hour period. Historically, high demand due to elevated temperatures in the summer months or high demand due to reduced temperatures in the winter months, combined with underperformance of wind generation, has created the conditions during which the ORDC contributes meaningfully to power prices. Extreme weather conditions can also lead to scarcity conditions regardless of season. Other than during periods of "scarcity pricing," the price of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities; as a result, historically low natural gas prices have had a corresponding impact on wholesale pricesfacilities (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Key Operational RisksSignificant Activities and ChallengesEvents, and Items Influencing Future Performance).

3

Table of Contents
Transactions in ERCOT take place in two key markets: the day-ahead market and the real-time market. The day-ahead market is a voluntary, financial electricity market conducted the day before each operating day in which generators and purchasers of electricity may bid for one or more hours of electricity supply or consumption. The real-time market is a physical market in which electricity is dispatched and priced in five-minute intervals. The day-ahead market provides market participants with visibility into where prices are expected to clear, and the prices are not impacted by subsequent events. Conversely, the real-time market exposes purchasers to the risk of transient operational events and price spikes. These two markets allow market participants to manage their risk profile by adjusting their participation in each market. In addition, ERCOT uses ancillary services to maintain system reliability, including regulation service, responsive reserve service and non-spinning reserve service. Ancillary services are provided by generators and qualified loads to help maintain the stable voltage and frequency requirements of the transmission system. ERCOT currently procures ancillary services in the day-ahead market, but plans to implement co-optimization of energy and ancillary services in the real-time market in 2026. Because ERCOT has one of the highest concentrations of wind and solar capacity generation among U.S. markets, the ERCOT market is more susceptible to fluctuations in wholesale electricity supply due to intermittent wind and solar production, making ERCOT more vulnerable to periods of generation scarcity.

East Segment

Our East segment Beginning in July 2021, ERCOT has increased its ancillary service procurement volumes to maintain a more conservative level of operating reserves. ERCOT implemented the ERCOT Contingency Reserve Service (ECRS) in June 2023 to further address the need for operating reserves to manage load and intermittent resource output uncertainty. The Texas legislature has also directed the creation of a new ancillary service, Dispatchable Reliability Reserve Service, that is comprised of 21 power generation facilitiescurrently projected to be implemented in 10 states totaling 12,093 MW of generating capacity in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
PJMCCGTNatural Gas86,081 
PJMCTNatural Gas41,346 
PJMCTFuel Oil293 
ISO-NECCGTNatural Gas63,361 
NYISOCCGTNatural Gas11,212 
Total East Segment2112,093 
2026.

PJM — PJM is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 180,000183,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 65 million customers in all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.

6

Table of Contents
Like ERCOT, PJM administers markets for wholesale electricity and provides transmission planning for the region, utilizing a locational marginal pricing (LMP) methodology which calculates a price for every generator and load point within PJM. PJM operates day-ahead and real-time markets into which generators can bid to provide energy and ancillary services. PJM also administers a forward capacity auction, the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM), which establishes a long-term market for capacity. We have participated in RPM auctions for years up to and including PJM's planning year 2021-2022,2024-2025, which ends May 31, 2022. Due to a change in auction rules,2025. PJM's next RPM auction for planning year 2022-2023,2025-2026 was delayed until May 2021.and is expected to be run in June 2024. We also enter into bilateral capacity transactions. PJM's Capacity Performance (CP) rules were designed to improve system reliability and include penalties for under-performing units and reward for over-performing units during shortage events. Full transition of the capacity market to CP rules occurred in planning year 2020-2021. An independent market monitor continually monitors PJM markets to ensure a robust, competitive market and to identify improper behavior by any entity.

ISO-NE — ISO-NE is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 31,00032,400 MW of installedwinter generation capacity to approximately 15 million customers in the states of Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maine.

ISO-NE dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the participating stateslocations in ISO-NE and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. ISO-NE offers a forward capacity marketthe Forward Capacity Market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Performance incentive rules have the potential to increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

NYISO — NYISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 40,00037,000 MW of installed summer generation capacity to approximately 20 million New York customers.

NYISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in the NYISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. NYISO offers the Installed Capacity Market, a forward capacity market where capacity prices are determined through auctions. Strip auctions occur one to two months prior to the commencement of a six-month seasonal planning period. Subsequent auctions provide an opportunity to sell excess capacity for the balance of the seasonal planning period or the upcoming month. Due to the short-term nature of the NYISO-operated capacity auctions and a relatively liquid bilateral market for NYISO capacity products, our Independence facility sells a significant portion of its capacity through bilateral transactions. The balance is cleared through the seasonal and monthly capacity auctions.

West Segment
4


Table of Contents
Our West segment is comprised of two power generation facilities totaling 1,185 MW of generation capacity and one battery ESS totaling 300 MW in CAISO, all of which are located in California.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
CAISOCCGTNatural Gas11,020 
CAISOBatteryRenewable1300 
CAISOCTFuel Oil1165 
Total West Segment31,485 

In addition, we are developing approximately 136 MW of battery energy storage systems at our Moss Landing and Oakland facilities that are expected to enter commercial operations in 2021-2022 (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements).

CAISO — CAISO is an ISO that manages the flow of electricity to approximately 32 million customers primarily in California, representing approximately 80% percent of the state's electric load.

7

Energy is priced in CAISO utilizing an LMP methodology. The capacity market is comprised of Generic, Flexible and Local Resource Adequacy (RA) Capacity and is administered by the California Public Utilities Commission.Commission (CPUC). Unlike other centrally cleared capacity markets, the resource adequacy marketmarkets in California is aare primarily bilaterally traded market.markets. In 2020, the CPUC introduced a central procurement entity for Local RA Capacity effective for the 2023 compliance year. The central procurement entity runs a pay-as-bid auction for Local RA Capacity. In November 2016, CAISO implemented a voluntary capacity auction for annual, monthly, and intra-month procurement to cover for deficiencies in the market. The voluntary Competitive Solicitation Process, which FERC approved in October 2015, is a modification to the Capacity Procurement Mechanism (CPM) and provides another avenue to sell RA capacity.

Sunset Segment

Our Sunset segment is comprised of 10 power generation facilities totaling 7,486 MW of generating capacity in MISO, PJM and ERCOT. The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans between 2022 and 2027 that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments No separate segment previously existed to differentiate operating plants with defined retirement plans from operating plants without defined retirement plans. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for more information related to these planned generation retirements.

ISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNumber of FacilitiesNet Capacity (MW)
ERCOTSTCoal1650 
MISOSTCoal43,187 
MISOCTNatural Gas2221 
PJMSTCoal33,428 
Total Sunset Segment107,486 

See Texas Segment above for a discussion of the ERCOT ISO and East Segment above for a discussion of the PJM RTO.

MISO — MISO is an RTO that manages the flow of electricity from approximately 198,000190,000 MW of installed generation capacity to approximately 4245 million customers in all or parts of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Arkansas, Mississippi, Texas, Louisiana, Montana, South Dakota and Manitoba, Canada.

MISO dispatches power plants to meet system energy and reliability needs and settles physical power deliveries at LMPs. Its energy markets allow market participants to buy and sell energy and ancillary services at prices established through real-time and day-ahead auctions. Energy prices vary among the regional zones and locations in MISO and are largely influenced by transmission constraints and fuel supply. An independent market monitor is responsible for evaluating the performance of the markets and identifying conduct by market participants or MISO that may compromise the efficiency or distort the outcome of the markets.

MISO administers a one-year Planning Resource Auction for the next planning year from June 1st of the current year to May 31st of the following year. In 2022, FERC approved MISO's proposal to change the annual Planning Resource Auction into a seasonal auction, effective for the 2023-2024 planning year. We participate in these auctions with open capacity that has not been committed through bilateral or retail transactions. We also participate in the MISO annual and monthly financial transmission rights auctions to manage the cost of our transmission congestion, as measured by the congestion component of the LMP price differential between two points on the transmission grid across the market area.

Joppa, which is partially interconnected to MISO and partially within the Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI) control area, is interconnected to the Tennessee Valley Authority and Louisville Gas and Electric Company. Joppa primarily sells its capacity and energy to MISO.

8

Wholesale Operations

Our wholesale commodity risk management group is responsible for dispatching our generation fleet in response to market needs after implementing portfolio optimization strategies, thus linking and integrating the generation fleet production with our retail customer and wholesale sales opportunities. Market demand, also known as load, faced by electric power systems, such as those we operate in, varies from moment to moment as a result of changes in business and residential demand, which is often driven by weather. Unlike most other commodities, the production and consumption of electricity must remain balanced on an instantaneous basis. There is a certain baseline demand for electricity across an electric power system that occurs throughout the day, which is typically satisfied by baseload generatinggeneration units with low variable operating costs. Baseload generatinggeneration units can also increase output to satisfy certain incremental demand and reduce output when demand is unusually low. Intermediate/load-following generatinggeneration units, which can more efficiently change their output to satisfy increases in demand, typically satisfy a large proportion of changes in intraday load as they respond to daily increases in demand or unexpected changes in supply created by reduced generation from renewable resources or other generator outages. Peak daily loads may be satisfied by peaking units. Peaking units are typically the most expensive to operate, but they can quickly start up and shut down to meet brief peaks in demand. In general, baseload units, intermediate/load following units and peaking units are dispatched into the ISO/RTO grid in order from lowest to highest variable cost. Price formation is typically based on the highest variable cost unit that clears the market to satisfy system demand at a given point in time.

Our commodity risk management group also enters into electricity, natural gas and other commodity derivative contracts to reduce exposure to changes in prices primarily to hedgemitigate the volatility of future revenues and fuel costs for our generation facilities and purchased power costs for our Retail segment.

Seasonality

The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make, such fluctuations more pronounced. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.

5

Competition

Competition in the markets in which we operate is impacted by electricity and fuel prices, congestion along the power grid, subsidies provided by state and federal governments for new and existing generation facilities, including renewables generation and battery ESS, new market entrants, construction of new generatinggeneration assets, technological advances in power generation, the actions of environmental and other regulatory authorities, and other factors. We primarily compete with other electricity generators and retailers based on our ability to generate electric supply, market and sell electricity at competitive prices and to efficiently utilize transportation from third-party pipelines and transmission from electric utilities to deliver electricity to end-users. Competitors in the generation and retail power markets in which we participate include numerous regulated utilities, industrial companies, non-utility generators, competitive subsidiaries of regulated utilities, independent power producers, REPs and other energy marketers. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information concerning the risks faced with respect to the markets in which we operate.

Brand Value
Business Strategy

Our TXU Energy brand, which has been used to sell electricity to customersVistra is a leader in the clean power transition. With a strong zero-carbon generation portfolio and a deliberate and responsible strategy to decarbonize, Vistra understands our obligation to balance reliability, affordability, and sustainability. To align our strategy with this obligation we have defined four strategic priorities that we aim to execute against:

Long-term, attractive earnings profile through the integrated business model.
Strategic energy transition that supports the reliability and affordability of electricity.
Significant and consistent shareholder return of capital.
Maintaining a strong balance sheet.

Long-term, attractive earnings profile through the integrated business model. Our integrated business model distinguishes us from our electricity competitors as it pairs our reliable and efficient diversified generation fleet and wholesale commodity risk management capabilities with our retail platform. Integrating retail with power generation stands as a fundamental competitive retailadvantage that mitigates the impact of commodity price fluctuations and enhances the stability and predictability of our cash flows. Stability and predictability of cash flows are essential as we evaluate economically attractive investments.

Strategic energy transition that supports the reliability and affordability of electricity. As one of the largest electricity marketgenerators in Texas for approximately 19 years, is registered and protected by trademark lawthe U.S., Vistra has led the way in decarbonization efforts and is committed to sustainability, setting aggressive targets, and transitioning our fleet to low-to-no carbon resources, all while balancing our obligations to our stakeholders. While the only material intellectual property assetway we generate electricity may be changing, our essential role in providing reliable and affordable electricity is not.

Significant and consistent shareholder return of capital. We make thoughtful capital allocation decisions that balances the goal of returning significant and consistent capital to our stockholders through share repurchases and quarterly dividends with the allocation of capital to maintain current assets and explore opportunities for growth.

Maintaining a strong balance sheet. Vistra' s disciplined approach to capital management supports our commitment to maintain a strong balance sheet. A strong balance sheet ensures our access to diverse sources of liquidity and provides financial flexibility for our capital allocation decisions, including decisions to return significant and consistent capital to our stockholders.

Human Capital Resources

Vistra's approach to human capital management is guided by our core values. These values are:

We do business the right way. Every decision we own. make and action we take will be evidence of the utmost integrity and compliance.
We have also acquiredcompete to win. We will create the trade names for Ambit Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Powerleading integrated energy company with an unmatched work ethic, an analysis-driven and U.S. Gas & Electric throughdisciplined culture with strong leadership and decision-making throughout the Ambit Transaction, Crius Transactionorganization.
We work as a team. We are committed to each other, everything we do and to the Merger, as the case may be. Assuccess of December 31, 2020,our company.
We care about our key stakeholders. We respect our fellow employees, we have reflected intangible assetsfocus on our balance sheet forcustomers and we care about our trade names of approximately $1.374 billion (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).communities where we live and do business. We will maintain productive and respectful relationship with our legislators, regulators and community leaders.

96

Human Capital ResourcesOur core values apply to all employees, suppliers and contractors and guide how we interact with our partner companies, communities, the environment and all other stakeholders. We aim to conduct all aspects of our business in accordance with these core values, which serve as the cultural foundation of the Company.

As a key component of our core principle that we work as a team, Vistra believes our most valuable asset is our talented, dedicated and diverse group of employees who work together to achieve our objectives, and our top priority is ensuring their safety. One of Vistra's core principles is that we care about our key stakeholders, including our employees. We invest in our people through numerous development and training opportunities, engaging employee programs and generous benefit and wellness offerings.

As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had approximately 5,3654,870 full-time employees, including approximately 1,6401,200 employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Safety

Vistra's mindset around safety is exemplified by our motto: Best Defense. Everyone wins. No one gets hurt. Our safety culture revolves around people and human performance. We place a high importance on continuous improvement, along with a keen focus on numerous learning and error-prevention tools. To facilitate a learning environment, our various operating plants share their investigations and learnings of all safety events with all operations employees on weekly calls. The information is presented by front-line employees and supported by management. The lessons from each event are shared across the fleet to prevent similar incidents at other locations. All personnel at Vistra locations are encouraged to be actively involved in the safety process. Managers are required to participate in safety engagements with staff to enable constant communication and sustained interaction. In 2020,2023, the generation fleet conducted more than 57,00056,000 leadership safety engagements across the fleet continuing our employee driven safety program focused on engagement of all employees.

Our focus on reducing the severity of injuries for both our employees and contractors who work with us has shown positive results. In 2020, we did not have anySince the implementation of our Best Defense safety program, the number of serious injuries or fatalities to our Vistra employees.has decreased significantly. Although we do not focus on recordable incidents, our Total Recordable Incident rate (TRIR) for company employees was 0.54, in the company was 0.61, better than the firsttop quartile as compared to the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 20192022 Total Company Injury data.Data. We encourage near-miss reporting and review of events to promote a learning environment. In 2020,2023, safety learning calls were held every week where near missnear-miss and safety events were reviewed by our operating teams to promote learning across the fleet.

All Vistra employees are covered by our safety program. OfficeCorporate and retail employees are required to complete periodic training on safety topics through our online learning management system. PowerEmployees who are located at a power plant employees are required to complete trainings based on job function, which is also tracked through our central learning management system. In addition, the Company engages an independent third-party conformity assessment and certification vendor to manage adherence to our safety standards for all vendors and contractors who work at our plants. In addition, we work closely with our suppliers and contractors to ensure our safety practices are upheld.

OurAll of our power plant facilities have effective health and safety programs and comply with OSHA regulations. In addition to compliance, our generation fleet has a total of 1214 plants that have been awarded the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) Star designation by the OSHA for superior demonstration of effective safety and health management systems and for maintaining injury and illness rates below the national averages for our industry. Two additional plants submitted applicationsOur Hopewell, Ontelaunee and Independence generation facilities completed reevaluations and were re-certified as VPP Star in 2020 and are awaiting review by the OSHA.2023. VPP Star status is the highest designation of OSHA's Voluntary Protection Programs. The achievement recognizes employers and workers who have implemented effective safety and health management systems and maintain injury and illness rates below national Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) averages for their respective industries. These sites are self-sufficient in their ability to control workplace hazards and are reevaluated every three to five years. Additionally, 2332 of our power plants and mine locations have adopted a proactive Behavior Based Safety approach to safety which focuses on identifying and providing feedback on at-risk behaviors observed.

In 2020, our Kosse mine site was recognized for the Sentinels of Safety Award by the National Mining Association, the highest distinction for mine safety. This is the second time Kosse has been awarded in the last three years showing the commitment to safety at our mining operations.

10

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

We recognize the value of having a diverse and inclusive workforce. Our diversity includes all the ways we differ, such as age, gender, ethnicity and physical appearance, as well as underlying differences such as thoughts, styles, religions, nationality, education and numerous other traits. Creating and maintaining an environment where differences are valued and respected enhances our ability to recruit and retain the best talent in the marketplace. As we continuemarketplace and to promote and maintain anprovide a work environment that fosters creativity, productivity and mutual respect, Vistra becomes the employer of choice by recognizing and using the value that each individual bringsallows all employees to the workplace.be their best.

7

Vistra's diversity is evolving, and our Board and management isare leading by example. Currently, four of the eleven Board members are women, and two of the eleven are ethnically diverse. Overall, 28%32% of the Company's workforce is ethnically diverse. Women currently hold 26%24% of the Company's senior management positions, and ethnically diverse employees represent 23%27% of senior management. In 2020, the Board of Directors increased diversity as well. Currently three of the ten board members are women, and two of the ten board members are ethnically diverse.

During 2020,2023, we launched multiple initiativescontinued our efforts to unlock the full potential of our people - and our company - throughby launching multiple new initiatives within our diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. We formalized aOur Chief Diversity Officer continued to develop and lead Vistra's employee-led Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Advisory Council, and expandedestablished in 2020. We continued to utilize our fifteen Employee Resource Groups (ERG)(ERGs) to promote the appreciation of and communicate awareness of diverse employee groups and communities and their contribution to the overall success of the organization, both internally and externally. New ERGs will join existing ERGs such as Vistra's Women's Information Network, Opportunities for Professional Enrichment and Networking, Parents at Work, Veterans and Toastmasters. Further initiatives were launched to support the education, recruitment and retention of current and futurerepresent not only diverse cultures, but also employees with particulardisabilities, the LGBTQ+ community and employees engaged in innovation and analytics. The emphasis being placed on driving equal accessskills-based hiring continues to opportunitiesevolve as we see increased mobility of employees throughout the organization. We contracted with Basic Diversity, Inc.organization as well as increased retention. Vistra is elevating its commitment to conduct an assessment of Vistra'sdisability diversity equity and inclusion training needs, and as part ofby increasing our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion, we named our firstsupport level with DisabilityIn. We now have leaders on all eligible committees within the organization (executive sponsor, Chief Diversity Officer, ERG leader, accessibility). We centralized our intern program to ensure a diverse intern pool from across the country and are expanding our college partnerships to ensure geographically diverse opportunities in January 2021.research, sponsorships and recruitment. Training on inclusion and acceptance is being presented to all frontline employees to ensure every employee is included in the conversation.

Vistra is active in our communities to promote inclusivity. Vistra's supply chain diversity initiative seeks to reflect our customer base and workforce compositions through creating a diverse supply chain. Vistra continued to expand its commitment to an inclusive economy by fostering mentorship of diverse businesses. Further, in the fourth year of Vistra's $10 million five-year commitment to support underserved communities, Vistra provided funding to educational and economic development nonprofits around the country working to transform underserved communities for the better.

Training and Development

We believe the development of employees at all levels is critical to Vistra's current and future success. We have launched key programs to develop leaders at all levels of the organization, including monthly leader meetings for director-level employees focusing on gaining a deeper understandingorganization. Vistra's Essentials of Vistra's strategy, developing cross-functional relationships and interacting with senior leadership of the company. Essentials in Leadership provides first timenew managers with skills to lead organizations in situational leadership, business acumen, identification of communication styles and inclusive communication practices,leadership, and exposes them to best practices from across the company. We also revised multiple leadershipcontinue to evaluate and refine our programs to continue virtually duringas the COVID-19 pandemic.development needs of our employees change. In 2023, Vistra refreshed our Front-Line Leader development program focusing on the development of supervisors and managers at our plants.

Vistra also provides many other training and development programs to help grow and develop employees at every level, including online learning platform courses, learning management system courses, recorded webinars and presentations, self-paced development and employee-specific skill training. Thousands of web-based targeted courses are available to all employees, and the company furtherThe Vistra Learning Community is our online platform that strategically supports employees in completing thousands of hours of professional training to support continuing education requirements for their respective professional licenses, including accounting, legal and nuclear. We also supportIn 2024, Vistra continued its formal mentoring program available to all employees to focus on topics like organizational knowledge, career development, individual development, collaboration and leadership. Over 500 employees participated in 2023. In addition, all full-time employees, other than those in a varietycollective bargaining unit, receive a formal performance review guiding development and improving results of employee-initiated and -led programs based on demographics, interests and purpose, including Women's Information Network, Opportunities for Professional Enrichment and Networking, Parents at Work, TXU Green Team and Toastmasters.the business.

Employee Benefits

Maintaining attractive benefits and pay are important for recruiting and retaining talent. We are committed to maintaining an equitable compensation structure, including performing annual salary reviews by employee category level within significant locations of operations. Eligible full- and part-time employees are provided access to medical, prescription drug, dental, vision, life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, and long-term disability coverage, accident coverage, critical illness coverage and hospital indemnity coverage. Regular full-time employees are eligible for short-term disability benefits, and all employees are eligible for the employee assistance program, parental leave, maternity leave and a 401(k) plan through which the Company matches employee contributions up to 6%.

118

Wellness

We believe a healthy workforce leads to greater well-being at work and at home. To help keep our workforce healthy, we offer access to on-site medical clinics at six locations. Our healthcare plans are also designed to reward employees for getting annual physicals, age and cancer screenings.gender health screenings and immunizations. In addition, our employee medical plans promote mental health and emotional wellness and offer resources for employees seeking assistance. Fitness centers in multiple facilities offer cardio equipment, a selection of free weights and exercise mats. Our employee-led wellness team engages our people to get active and support causes that promote healthy living. With support from the company, the wellness team covers the registration costs for employees to participate in more than a dozen running and cycling events eachthroughout the year. Additionally, the team hosts quarterly blood drives and recruits participants for our cycling and soccer teams.

Environmental Regulations and Related Considerations

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including the EPA and the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate. The EPA has recently finalized or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. See Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional discussion of risks posed to us regarding regulatory requirements. See Note 1314 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of litigation related to EPA reviews.

In January 2021, the Biden administration issued a series of Executive Orders, including one titled Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis (the Environment Executive Order) which directed agencies, including the EPA, to review various agency actions promulgated during the prior administration and take action where the previous administration's action conflicts with national objectives. Several of the EPA agency actions discussed below are now subject to this review.

Climate Change

There is increasing attention and interestcontinuing emphasis domestically and internationally abouton global climate change and how greenhouse gas (GHG)GHG emissions, such as carbon dioxide (COCO2), contribute to global climate change. GHG emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels, primarily by our coal/lignite-fueled-generationcoal-fueled-generation plants as well as our natural gas-fueled generation plants represent the substantial majority of our total GHG emissions. CO2, methane and nitrous oxide are emitted in this combustion process, with CO2 representing the largest portion of these GHG emissions. We estimate that our generation facilities produced approximately 10395 million short tons of CO2 in 2020.the year ended 2023.

To manage our environmental impact from our business activities and reduce our emissions profile, Vistra set emissions reduction targets. Vistra is targeting to achieve a 60% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 CO2 equivalent emissions by 2030 as compared to a 2010 baseline with a long-term goal to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, assuming necessary advancements in technology and supportive market constructs and public policy. Since 2010, Vistra has retired more than 15,100 MW of coal and natural gas power plants resulting in a 50% reduction in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, a 68% reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions, and an 89% reduction in sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions through year-end 2023, compared to a 2010 baseline. In furtherance of Vistra's efforts to meet its net-zero target, Vistra expects to deploy multiple levers to transition the company to operating with net-zero emissions, including decarbonization of existing business lines and further diversification into low-to-no emission businesses, primarily renewables and battery ESS. We have already taken or announced significant steps to transition the fuel-mixtransform our generation portfolio and reduce the emissions profileintensity of our generation fleet, including:

Solar Development ProjectsIn 2018, we beganWe operate solar generations facilities totaling 338 MW in Texas. We have announced our plans to develop:
additional solar generation facilities in Texas, with expected commercial operation of our 180 MW Upton 2 solar facility. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of 668dates beginning in 2025, and
up to 300 MW of solar generation facilities at retired or to-be retired plant sites in Texas that areIllinois with expected commercial operation dates ranging from 2024 to begin commercial operations during 2021-2022.2026.
Battery Energy Storage ProjectsIn 2018, our 10We operate battery ESS totaling 270 MW battery energy storage system (ESS) at our Upton 2 solar facility in Texas commenced operations. Between 2018 and 2020, we750 MW in California. We have announced the planned development of approximately 436our plans to develop up to 150 MW of various ESSsbattery ESS at retired or to-be-retired plant sites in California that areIllinois with expected to enter commercial operations in 2021-2022. In September 2020, we announced the planned development of a 260 MW ESS in Texas that is expected to enter commercial operation in 2022.dates ranging from 2024 to 2026.
Acquisition of CCGTs — In 2016 and 2017, we acquired 4,042 MW of CCGTs in Texas. In 2018, we acquired 15,448 MW of CCGTs across various ISOs/RTOs in connection with the Dynegy Merger.
Retirements of CoalFossil Fuel GenerationInSince 2018, we retired 4,167 MW of lignite/coal-fueled generation facilities retired include 4,167 MW in Texas. In 2019, we retired 2,068Texas, 4,040 MW of coal-fueled generation facilities in Illinois.Illinois and 1,300 MW in Ohio. We expect to retire an additional 7,4864,578 MW of coal-fueled generation facilities in Illinois, Ohio and Texas no later than year-end 2027.
Acquisition of Nuclear Generation Facilities — In 2023, we announced the acquisition of 4,048 MW of nuclear generation facilities in PJM from Energy Harbor. We anticipate the transaction will close on March 1, 2024.

9

We will only invest in growth projects if we are confident in the expected returns. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our solar and battery energy storageESS projects and Note 4 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our retirement of generation facilities.

12Green Finance Framework

In December 2021, we announced the publication of Contentsour Green Finance Framework, which allows us to issue green financial instruments to fund new or existing projects that support renewable energy and energy efficiency with alignment to our ESG strategy. See Note 15 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Series B Preferred Stock issued under our Green Finance Framework.

Greenhouse GasGHG Emissions

In August 2015, the EPA finalized rules to address GHG emissions from electricity generation units, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, including rules for existing facilities that would establish state-specific emissions rate goals to reduce nationwide CO2 emissions. Various parties filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court). In July 2019, petitioners filed a joint motion to dismiss in light of the EPA's new rule that replaces the Clean Power Plan, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, discussed below. In September 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court granted petitioners' motion to dismiss and dismissed all of the petitions challenging the Clean Power Plan as moot.

In July 2019, the EPA finalized a rule to repealthat repealed the Clean Power Plan with(CPP) and established new regulations addressing GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generation units, referred to as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule. The ACE rule developsdeveloped emission guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generatinggeneration units. The ACE rule set a deadline of July 2022 for statesIn response to submit their plans for regulating GHG emissions from existing facilities. States where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) have begun the development of their state plans to comply with the rule. Environmentalchallenges brought by environmental groups and certain states, filed petitionsthe U.S. Court of Appeals for reviewthe District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) vacated the ACE rule, andincluding the repeal of the Clean Power PlanCPP, in the D.C. Circuit Court, and the D.C. Circuit Court heard argument on those issues in October 2020. In January 2021 the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the ACE rule and remanded the rule to the EPA for further action. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the D.C. Circuit Court's decision, and finding that the EPA exceeded its decision,authority under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the EPA set emission requirements in the CPP based on generation shifting. In October 2022, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that the EPA's basisissued an amended judgment, denying petitions for repealing the Clean Power Plan and adoptingreview of the ACE rule was not supported byand challenges to the Clean Air Act. Additionally, in December 2018,repeal of the CPP. In addition, the EPA issued proposed revisionsopened a docket seeking input on questions related to the regulation of GHGs under Section 111(d) which closed in March 2023. In May 2023, the EPA released a new proposal regulating power plant GHG emissions, while also proposing to repeal the ACE rule. The new GHG proposal sets limits for (a) new natural gas-fired combustion turbines, (b) existing coal-, oil- and natural gas-fired steam generation units, and (c) certain existing natural gas-fired combustion turbines. The proposed standards are based on technologies such as carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS), low-GHG hydrogen co-firing, and natural gas co-firing. Starting in 2030, the proposal would generally require more CO2 emissions control at fossil fuel-fired power plants that operate more frequently and for more years and would phase in increasingly stringent CO2 requirements over time. Under the proposal, states would be required to submit plans to the EPA within 24 months of the rule's effective date that provide for the establishment, implementation, and enforcement of standards of performance for existing sources. These state plans must generally establish standards that are at least as stringent as the EPA's emission guidelines. Existing steam generation units must start complying with their standards for new, modified and reconstructed units. Vistraof performance on January 1, 2030. Existing combustion turbine units must start complying with their standards of performance on January 1, 2032, or January 1, 2035, depending on their subcategory. We submitted comments on that proposed rulemaking in March 2019. In January 2021,to the EPA just prior to the transition to the Biden administration, issued a final rule setting forth a significant contribution finding for the purpose of regulating GHG emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The final rule exclude sectors from future regulation where GHG emissions make up less than three percent of U.S. GHG emissions. The final rule did not set any specific emission limits for new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The ACE rule and the rule on significant contribution are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.this proposal in August 2023.

State Regulation of GHGs

Many states where we operate generation facilities have, are considering, or are in some stage of implementing, state-only regulatory programs intended to reduce emissions of GHGs from stationary sources as a means of addressing climate change.

Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) — RGGI is a state-driven GHG emission control program that took effect in 2009 and was initially implemented by ten New England and Mid-Atlantic states to reduce CO2 emissions from power plants. The participating RGGI states implemented a cap-and-trade program. Compliance with RGGI can be achieved by reducing emissions, purchasing or trading allowances, or securing offset allowances from an approved offset project. We are required to hold allowances equal to at least 50 percent of emissions in each of the first two years of the three-year control period.

In December 2017, the RGGI states released an updated model rule with changes to the CO2 budget trading program, including an additional 30 percent reduction in the CO2 annual cap by the year 2030, relative to 2020 levels. RGGI is currently conducting its third program review which may include an updated model rule.

10

Our generatinggeneration facilities in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York and Virginia emitted approximately 710 million short tons of CO2 during 2020.2023. The spot market price of RGGI allowances required to operate these facilities as of December 31, 20202023 was approximately $8.11$15.35 per allowance. The spot market price of RGGI allowances required to operate our affected facilities during 20212024 was $8.34approximately $16.21 per allowance on February 23, 2021.2024. While the cost of allowances required to operate our RGGI-affected facilities is expected to increase in future years, we expect that the cost of compliance would be reflected in the power market, and the actual impact to gross margin would be largely offset by an increase in revenue.

Massachusetts — In August 2017, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) adopted final rules establishing an annual declining limit on aggregate CO2 emissions from 21 in-state fossil-fueled electricity generation units. The rules establish an allowance trading system under which the annual aggregate electricity generation unit sector cap on CO2 emissions declines from 8.96 million metric tons in 2018 to 1.8 million metric tons in 2050. MassDEP allocated emission allowances to affected facilities for 2018. Beginning in 2019, the allocation process transitioned to a competitive auction process whereby allowances are partially distributed through a competitive auction process and partially distributed based on the process and schedule established by the rule. Beginning in 2021, all allowances will bewere distributed through the auction. Limited banking of unused allowances is allowed.

13

Virginia — In May 2019, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality issued a final rule to adopt a carbon cap-and trade program for fossil-fueled electricity generation units, including our Hopewell facility, beginning in 2020. The program is based on the RGGI proposed 2017 model rule and will linklinked Virginia to RGGI beginning in 2021. The Governor of Virginia issued an executive order in January 2022 to begin the process of removing the state from RGGI. The Virginia State Pollution Control Board withdrew the state from RGGI at the end of 2023, coinciding with the end of the program's three-year compliance period and contract with RGGI, Inc. In August 2023, opponents of the state's action filed suit seeking a stay alleging withdrawal from RGGI is impermissible without new legislation. Virginia is not participating in RGGI at this time.

New Jersey — In January 2018, the Governor of New Jersey signed an executive order directing the state's environmental agency and public utilities board to begin the process of rejoining RGGI, and New Jersey formally rejoined RGGI in June 2019. In June 2019, New Jersey adopted two rules that govern New Jersey's reentry into the RGGI auction and distribution of the RGGI auction proceeds.

Pennsylvania — In April 2022, the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board finalized regulations that would establish Pennsylvania's participation in RGGI. In July 2022, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth Court) took action to uphold a preliminary injunction over Pennsylvania's RGGI regulations. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied a request for emergency relief from the injunction in August 2022. In November 2023, the Commonwealth Court found that Pennsylvania cannot join RGGI without legislative approval and enjoined the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection from implementing RGGI. The state has appealed this decision to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court where it is still pending. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protections has indicated it will not seek to implement RGGI until the Pennsylvania Supreme Court acts. As a result, RGGI is not being implemented or enforced in Pennsylvania at this time.

California — Our assets in California are subject to the California Global Warming Solutions Act, which required the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop a GHG emission control program to reduce emissions of GHGs in the state to 1990 levels by 2020. In April 2015, the Governor of California issued an executive order establishing a new statewide GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 to ensure California meets its 2050 GHG reduction target of 80 percent below 1990 levels. We have participated in quarterly auctions or in secondary markets, as appropriate, to secure allowances for our affected assets.

In July 2017, California enacted legislation extending its GHG cap-and-trade program through 2030 and the CARB adopted amendments to its cap-and-trade regulations that, among other things, established a framework for extending the program beyond 2020 and linking the program to the new cap-and-trade program in Ontario, Canada beginning in January 2018.

11

Air Emissions

The Clean Air Act (CAA)

The CAA and comparable state laws and regulations relating to air emissions impose various responsibilities on owners and operators of sources of air emissions, which include requirements to obtain construction and operating permits, pay permit fees, monitor emissions, submit reports and compliance certifications, and keep records. The CAA requires that fossil-fueled electricity generation plants meet certain pollutant emission standards and have sufficient emission allowances to cover sulfur dioxide (SOSO2) emissions and in some regions nitrogen oxide (NONOX) emissions.

In order to ensure continued compliance with the CAA and related rules and regulations, we utilize various emission reduction technologies. These technologies include flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems, dry sorbent injection (DSI), baghouses and activated carbon injection or mercury oxidation systems on select units and electrostatic precipitators, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, low-NOX burners and/or overfire air systems on all units. Additionally, our MISO coal-fueled facilities mainly use low sulfur coal, which, prior

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)

In 2016, the EPA finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update (CSAPR Update) to combustion, goes throughaddress 22 states' obligations with respect to the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In 2019, following challenges by numerous parties, the D.C. Circuit Court found that the CSAPR Update did not fully address certain states' 2008 ozone NAAQS obligations. In October 2020, the EPA proposed an action to address the outstanding 2008 ozone NAAQS obligations in response to the D.C. Circuit Court's 2019 ruling. Vistra subsidiaries filed comments on that rulemaking in December 2020, and the EPA published a refined coal process to further reducefinal rule in the Federal Register on April 30, 2021 that reduces ozone season NOX and mercury emissions. In 2018, we received approval to use refined coal at some ofbudgets in certain states. We do not believe that the final rule causes a material adverse impact on our Texas coal-fueled facilities.future financial results.

In October 2015, the EPA revised the primary and secondary ozone NAAQS to lower the 8-hour standard for ozone emissions during ozone season (May to September). As required under the CAA, in October 2018, the State of Texas submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to the EPA demonstrating that emissions from Texas sources do not contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other state with respect to the revised ozone NAAQS. In February 2023, the EPA disapproved Texas' SIP and the State of Texas, Luminant, certain trade groups, and others challenged that disapproval in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit Court). In March 2023, those same parties filed motions to stay the EPA's SIP disapproval in the Fifth Circuit Court, and the EPA moved to transfer our challenges to the D.C. Circuit Court or have those challenges dismissed.

In April 2022, prior to the EPA's disapproval of Texas' SIP, the EPA proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the 2015 ozone NAAQS. We, along with many other companies, trade groups, states and ISOs, including ERCOT, PJM and MISO, filed responsive comments to the EPA's proposal in June 2022, expressing concerns about certain elements of the proposal, particularly those that may result in challenges to electric reliability under certain conditions. In March 2023, the EPA administrator signed its final FIP. The FIP applies to 22 states beginning with the 2023 ozone seasons. States where Vistra operates electric generation units that would be subject to this rule are Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. Texas would be moved into the revised Group 3 trading program previously established in the Revised CSAPR Update Rule that includes emission budgets for 2023 that the EPA says are achievable through existing controls installed at power plants. Allowances will be limited under the program and will be further reduced beginning in ozone season 2026 to a level that is intended to reduce operating time of coal-fueled power plants during ozone season or force coal plants to retire, particularly those that do not have selective catalytic reduction systems such as our Martin Lake power plant.

In May 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court granted our motion to stay the EPA's disapproval of Texas' SIP pending a decision on the merits and denied the EPA's motion to transfer our challenge to the D.C. Circuit Court. As a result of the stay, we do not believe the EPA has authority to implement the FIP as to Texas sources pending the resolution of the merits, meaning that Texas will remain in Group 2 and not be subject to any requirements under the FIP at least until the Fifth Circuit Court rules on the merits. Oral argument was heard in December 2023 before the Fifth Circuit Court. In June 2023, the EPA published the final FIP in the Federal Register, which included requirements as to Texas despite the stay of the SIP disapproval by the Fifth Circuit Court. In June 2023, the State of Texas, Luminant and various other parties also filed challenges to the FIP in the Fifth Circuit Court, filed a motion to stay the FIP and confirm venue for this dispute in the Fifth Circuit Court. After the motion to stay and to confirm venue was filed, the EPA signed an interim final rule on June 29, 2023 that confirms the FIP as to Texas is stayed. In July 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that the FIP challenge would be held in abeyance pending the resolution of the litigation on the SIP disapproval and denied the motion to stay as not needed given the EPA's administrative stay.

12

Regional Haze — Reasonable Progress and Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for Texas

The Regional Haze Program of the CAA establishes "as a national goal the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory class I federal areas which impairment results from man-made pollution." There are two components to the Regional Haze Program. First, states must establish goals for reasonable progress for Class I federal areas within the state and establish long-term strategies to reach those goals and to assist Class I federal areas in neighboring states to achieve reasonable progress set by those states towards a goal of natural visibility by 2064. Second, certain electricity generation units built between 1962 and 1977 are subject to BART standards designed to improve visibility if such units cause or contribute to impairment of visibility in a federal class I area. BART reductions of SO2 and NOX are required either on a unit-by-unit basis or are deemed satisfied by state participation in an EPA-approved regional trading program such as the CSAPR or other approved alternative program.

14

In October 2017, the EPA issued a final rule addressing BART for Texas electricity generation units, with the rule serving as a partial approval of Texas' 2009 State Implementation Plan (SIP)SIP and a partial Federal Implementation Plan (FIP).FIP. For SO2, the rule established an intrastate Texas emission allowance trading program as a "BART alternative" that operates in a similar fashion to a CSAPR trading program. The program includes 39 generatinggeneration units (including ourthe Martin Lake, Big Brown, Monticello, Sandow 4, Coleto Creek, Stryker 2 and Graham 2 plants). The compliance obligations in the program started on January 1, 2019. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants have enhanced our ability to comply with this BART rule for SO2. For NOX, the rule adopted the CSAPR's ozone program as BART and for particulate matter, the rule approved Texas'sTexas' SIP that determines that no electricity generation units are subject to BART for particulate matter. Various parties filed a petition challenging the rule in the Fifth Circuit Court as well as a petition for reconsideration filed with the EPA. Luminant intervened on behalf of the EPA in the Fifth Circuit Court action. In March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court abated its proceedings pending conclusion of the EPA's reconsideration process. In August 2020, the EPA issued a final rule affirming the prior BART final rule but also included additional revisions that were proposed in November 2019. In October 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule inChallenges to both the D.C. Circuit Court2017 rule and the Fifth Circuit Court. Briefing is underway on the proper venue for any challenge to the final rule. As finalized, we expect that we will be able to comply with the rule. The BART rule is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Affirmative Defenses During Malfunctions

In May 2015, the EPA finalized a rule requiring 36 states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, to remove or replace either EPA-approved exemptions or affirmative defense provisions for excess emissions during upset events and unplanned maintenance and startup and shutdown events, referred to as the SIP Call. Various parties (including Luminant, the State of Texas and the State of Ohio) filed petitions for review of the EPA's final rule, and all of those petitions were2020 rules have been consolidated in the D.C. Circuit Court. In April 2017,Court, where we have intervened in support of the D.C. Circuit Court orderedEPA. We are in compliance with the caserule, and the retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants have enhanced our ability to be heldcomply. The EPA is in abeyance. In April 2019, the EPA Region 6 proposed aprocess of reconsidering the BART rule, to withdrawand the SIP Call with respect to the Texas affirmative defense provisions. We submitted comments on that proposed rulemaking in June 2019. In February 2020, the EPA issued the final rule withdrawing the Texas SIP Call. In April 2020, a group of environmental petitioners, including the Sierra Club, filed a petitionchallenges in the D.C. Circuit Court challenginghave been held in abeyance pending the EPA's final action with respect to Texas. Briefing is currently underwayon reconsideration. In May 2023, a proposed BART rule was published in the challenge toFederal Register that would withdraw the EPA's action with respect to Texas. In October 2020,trading program provisions of the EPA issued new guidance on the inclusion of startup, shutdownprior rule and malfunction (SSM) provisions in SIPs, which is intended to supersede the policy in the multi-state SIP Call. The guidance provides that the SIPs may contain provisions for SSM events if certain conditions are met. The EPA SSM guidance is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Illinois Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS)

In August 2019, changes proposed by the Illinois Pollution Control Board to the MPS rule, which places NOX,would establish SO2 and mercury emissions limits on our coal plants locatedsix facilities in MISO went into effect.Texas, including Martin Lake and Coleto Creek. Under the revised MPS rule, our allowable SO2current proposal, compliance would be required within 3 years for Martin Lake and NOX emissions from the MISO fleet are 48% and 42% lower, respectively, than prior5 years for Coleto Creek. Due to the rule changes. The revised MPS rule requires the continuous operation of existing selective catalytic reduction (SCR) control systems during the ozone season, requires SCR-controlled units to meet an ozone season NOX emission rate limit,announced shutdown for Coleto Creek, we do not anticipate any impacts at that facility, and set an additional, site-specific annual SO2 limit for our Joppa Power Station. Additionally, in 2019, the Company retired its Havana, Hennepin, Coffeen and Duck Creek plants in order to comply with the MPS rule's requirement to retirewe are evaluating potential compliance options at least 2,000 MW of our generation in MISO. See Note 4Martin Lake should this proposal become final. We submitted comments to the Financial Statements for information regarding the retirement of these four plants.EPA on this proposal in August 2023.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

The CAA requires the EPA to regulate emissions of pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment. The EPA has established NAAQS for six such pollutants, including SO2 and ozone. Each state is responsible for developing a SIP that will attain and maintain the NAAQS. These plans may result in the imposition of emission limits on our facilities.

15

SO2 Designations for Texas

In November 2016, the EPA finalized its nonattainment designations for counties surrounding our Big Brown, Monticello and Martin Lake generation plant and our now retired Big Brown and Monticello plants. The final designations require Texas to develop nonattainment plans for these areas. In February 2017, the State of Texas and Luminant filed challenges to the nonattainment designations in the Fifth Circuit Court. Subsequently, in October 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court granted the EPA's motion to hold the case in abeyance considering the EPA's representation that it intended to revisit the nonattainment rule. In December 2017, the TCEQ submitted a petition for reconsideration to the EPA. In August 2019, the EPA issued a proposed Error Correction Rule for all three areas, which, if finalized, would revisehave revised its previous nonattainment designations and each area at issue would be designated unclassifiable. In September 2019, we submitted comments in support of the proposed Error Correction Rule. In April 2020, the Sierra Club filed suit to compelMay 2021, the EPA to issue a Finding of Failure to submit an attainment plan with respect to the three areas in Texas. In August 2020, the EPA issued a Finding of Failure for Texas to submit an attainment plan. In September 2020, the EPA proposedfinalized a "Clean Data" determination for the areas surrounding the retired Big Brown and Monticello plants, which, if finalized, would redesignateredesignating those areas as attainment based on monitoring data supporting an attainment designation. In June 2021, the EPA published two notices; one that it was withdrawing the August 2019 Error Correction Rule and a second separate notice denying petitions from Luminant and the State of Texas to reconsider the original nonattainment designations. We, expectalong with the State of Texas, challenged that EPA action and have consolidated it with the pending challenge in the Fifth Circuit Court, and this case was argued before the Fifth Circuit Court in July 2022. In September 2021, the TCEQ considered a proposal for its nonattainment SIP revision for the Martin Lake area and an agreed order to develop areduce SO2 emissions from the plant. The proposed agreed order associated with the SIP for Texas for submittalproposal reduces emission limits as of January 2022. Emission reductions required are those necessary to demonstrate attainment with the NAAQS. The TCEQ's SIP action was finalized in February 2022 and has been submitted to the EPA for review and approval. In January 2024, in 2021.a split decision, the Fifth Circuit Court denied the petitions for review we and the State of Texas filed over EPA' 2016 nonattainment designation for SO2 for the area around Martin Lake. As a result of this decision, the EPA's nonattainment designation – originally made in 2016 – remains in place. We anticipate the EPA will likely move forward with either proposing a federal plan for the area in light of an approved consent decree between the Sierra Club and the EPA that requires the EPA taking final action promulgating a FIP for the nonattainment area by December 13, 2024 or the EPA may approve Texas' SIP submittal discussed above. In February 2024, we filed a petition asking the full Fifth Circuit Court to review the panel decision issued in January 2024.

13

Ozone Designations

The EPA issued a final rule in October 2015 lowering the ozone NAAQS from 75 to 70 parts per billion. Various parties challenged the 2015 ozone NAAQS; however, in August 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court generally upheld the 2015 ozone NAAQS but remanded the secondary ozone standard to the EPA for reconsideration. In November 2017, the EPA issued an initial round of area designations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS, designating most areas of the U.S. as attainment/unclassifiable. Several states and other groups have filed lawsuits seeking to compel the EPA to complete designations for all areas of the country. In December 2017, the EPA notified states of expected nonattainment area designations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Those areas include areas concerningAreas surrounding our Dicks Creek, Miami Fort and Zimmer facilities in Ohio, our Calumet facility in Illinois and our Wise, Ennis and Midlothian facilities in Texas. InTexas were designated marginal nonattainment areas in June 2018 by the EPA finalized these designations as marginal nonattainment areas.with an attainment deadline of August 2021. The EPA is required to take action on areas that did not attain by that date by bumping up the region to a "moderate" designation with an attainment deadline of August 2024. States will be required to develop SIPs to address emissions in areas with a higher (more stringent) classification.

Particulate Matter

In November 2017,February 2024, the EPA deniedissued a petition from nine northeastern states to add several states, including Illinois and Ohio, to715-page rule addressing the Ozone Transport Region. Eightannual health-based national ambient air quality standards for fine particulate matter (or PM2.5). In general, the rule lowers the level of the northeastern states filed a petition for judicial review challengingannual PM2.5 standard from 12.0 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) to 9.0 µg/m3. The effective date of the EPA's actionrule is 60 days from publication in the D.C. Circuit Court. In April 2019,Federal Register, and the D.C. Circuit Court deniedearliest attainment date for areas exceeding the states' petitionnew standard is 2032. At this time, we are still determining what impact, if any, this rule will have on our existing plants or any plants we may build in the future. Based on 2020-2022 design value associated with the rule, we have just five plants (Oakland (California), Calumet (Illinois), Liberty (Pennsylvania), Miami Fort (Ohio) and Lake Hubbard (Texas)) operating in areas where the air quality monitoring data are currently exceeding the new PM2.5 standard. We have previously announced that our Miami Fort generation facility will close by the end of 2027. States will have to develop a plan (by late 2027 at the earliest) to get those areas into attainment and there would be a possibility that additional controls would be required for review, upholdingthose sites. However, before the EPA's denial. Additionally, in January 2018, New Yorkstate begins this planning process, the designation process will occur within two years from the issuance of the final rule. The states develop recommendations about the boundaries of the nonattainment counties and Connecticut filed a lawsuit against the EPA inmust finalize the Southern Districtdesignations including the boundaries of New York seeking to compel the agency to issue a FIP for the 2008 ozone NAAQS that addresses sources in five upwind states, including Illinois. The plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on the matter in April 2018, and the court granted that motion in June 2018. As a result, the EPA was required to propose an action to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS by June 29, 2018, and promulgate a final action by December 6, 2018. In January 2019, the plaintiffs informed the district court that the EPA had satisfied its deadlines in accordance with the court's order. However, in January 2019, New York, Connecticut, four other states, and the City of New York filed a separate petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the final action the EPA took in December 2018 consistent with the Southern District of New York's order. In October 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the final rule, and in February 2020, New Jersey, Connecticut, three other states and the City of New York filed a lawsuit against the EPA in the Southern District of New York to compel the EPA to promulgate a fully-compliant FIP to address the 2008 ozone NAAQS in light of the D.C. Circuit Court's vacatur. In July 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered the EPA to issue a final rulemaking fully addressing the 2008 ozone NAAQS by March 15, 2021. The EPA proposed its action to address the outstanding 2008 ozone NAAQS obligations in October 2020. Vistra subsidiaries filed comments on that rulemaking in December 2020. These actions are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.each nonattainment area.

In November 2016, the State of Maryland petitioned the EPA to impose additional NOX emission control requirements on 36 electricity generation units in five upwind states, including our Zimmer facility, that the State alleges are contributing to nonattainment with the 2008 ozone NAAQS in Maryland. In the fall of 2017, Maryland and several environmental groups filed lawsuits against the EPA seeking to compel the Agency to act on the State's petition. In October 2018, the EPA took final action denying the Maryland petition, and Maryland filed a petition for review of the EPA's denial in the D.C. Circuit Court. In May 2020, the D.C. Circuit Court largely upheld the EPA's denial of Maryland's petition but granted Maryland's petition with respect to the EPA's treatment of sources with non-catalytic controls and remanded the issue to the EPA. Given that the Zimmer facility utilizes SCR technology to control NOX emissions, we do not believe that the EPA's action on remand could cause a material adverse impact on our future financial results.

16

In March 2018, the State of New York petitioned the EPA to find that emissions from hundreds of sources in nine states, including Illinois, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia are significantly contributing to New York's nonattainment and interfering with New York's maintenance of the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. On October 18, 2019, the EPA took final action denying New York's petition. On October 29, 2019, New York, New Jersey and the City of New York filed a petition for review of the EPA's denial of the Section 126 petition. In July 2020, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the EPA's denial and remanded the action to the EPA for further proceedings.

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)/CCR/Groundwater

The combustion of coal to generate electric power creates large quantities of ash and byproducts that are managed at power generation facilities in dry form in landfills and in wet form in surface impoundments. Each of our coal-fueled plants has at least one CCR surface impoundment. At present, CCR is regulated by the states as solid waste.

Coal Combustion Residuals

The EPA's CCR rule, which took effect in October 2015, establishes minimum federal requirements for the construction, retrofitting, operation and closure of, and corrective action with respect to, existing and new CCR landfills and surface impoundments, as well as inactive CCR surface impoundments. The requirements include location restrictions, structural integrity criteria, groundwater monitoring, operating criteria, liner design criteria, closure and post-closure care, recordkeeping and notification. The rule allows existing CCR surface impoundments to continue to operate for the remainder of their operating life, but generally would require closure (i.e., cessation of placement of CCR material and corrective action necessary to reach the standards provided in the CCR rule and applicable state rules) if groundwater monitoring demonstrates that the CCR surface impoundment is responsible for exceedances of groundwater quality protection standards or the CCR surface impoundment does not meet location restrictions or structural integrity criteria. The deadlines for beginning and completing closure vary depending on several factors. Several petitions for judicial review of the CCR rule were filed. The Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (the WIIN Act), which was enacted in December 2016, provides for EPA review and approval of state CCR permit programs.

In July 2018, the EPA published a final rule, which became effective in August 2018, that amends certain provisions
14

In August 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision that vacates and remands certain provisions of the 2015 CCR rule, including an applicability exemption for legacy impoundments. In December 2019, the EPA issued a proposed rule containing a revised closure deadline for unlined CCR impoundments and new procedures for seeking extensions of that revised closure deadline. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. In August 2020, the EPA issued a final rule finalizing the December 2019 proposal, establishing a deadline of April 11, 2021 to cease receipt of waste and initiate closure at unlined CCR impoundments. The final rule allows a generation plant to seek the EPA's approval to extend this deadline if no alternative disposal capacity is available and either a conversion to comply with the CCR rule is underway or retirement will occur by either 2023 or 2028 (depending on the size of the impoundment at issue). Prior to the November 2020 deadline, we submitted applications to the EPA requesting compliance extensions under both conversion and retirement scenarios. In 2022 and 2023, we withdrew the applications for Coffeen, Martin Lake, Joppa and Zimmer stations because extensions were no longer needed. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule in the D.C. Circuit Court, and Vistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA in December 2020. Also, in November 2020, the EPA finalized a rule that would allow an alternative liner demonstration for certain qualifying facilities. In November 2020, we submitted an application for an alternate liner demonstration for one CCR unit at Martin Lake.Lake, however, we withdrew the application for an alternate liner demonstration in November 2023 after determining the pond was no longer needed for CCR. In October 2020,August 2021, we submitted a request to transfer our conversion application for the Zimmer facility to a retirement application following the announcement that Zimmer will close by May 31, 2022. In January 2022, the EPA published an advanceddetermined that our conversion and retirement applications for our CCR facilities were complete but has not yet proposed action on any of those applications. In addition, in January 2022, the EPA also made a series of public statements, including in a press release, that purported to impose new, more onerous closure requirements for CCR units. The EPA issued these new purported requirements without prior notice and without following the legal requirements for adopting new rules. These new purported requirements announced by the EPA are contrary to existing regulations and the EPA's prior positions. In April 2022, we, along with the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group (USWAG), a trade association of proposed rulemaking requesting informationover 130 utility operating companies, energy companies, and certain other industry associations, filed petitions for review with the D.C. Circuit Court and have asked the court to informdetermine that the EPA cannot implement or enforce the new purported requirements because the EPA has not followed the required procedures. The State of Texas and the TCEQ have intervened in support of the petitions filed by the Vistra subsidiaries and USWAG, and various environmental groups have intervened on behalf of the EPA. Briefing before the D.C. Circuit Court is complete, and the court will hear argument in March 2024.

In May 2023, the EPA issued another proposal that further revises the federal CCR rule that would expand coverage of groundwater monitoring and closure requirements to the following two new categories of units: (a) legacy units which are CCR impoundments at inactive sites that ceased receiving waste before October 19, 2015 and (b) so-called "CCR management units" which generally could encompass areas of CCR located at a facility that is currently regulated by the existing CCR rule. CCR Management Units, as defined by the EPA in the developmentproposal, could include any ash deposits, haul roads, and previously closed impoundments and landfills. As part of the proposed rule, the EPA identified 134 CCR management units at 82 different facilities across the country, including six of our potential units. The Vermilion ash ponds discussed below are the only unit which we believe qualify as a rule to address legacy impoundmentsCCR surface impoundment and given our closure plan for that existed prior to the 2015 CCR regulation as required by the August 2018 D.C. Circuit Court decision. We filed comments onsite we do not believe this proposal, if finalized, will have any impact on that site. We are continuing to evaluate what would be required of the CCR management units identified in February 2021. The rules on revised closure deadlines and alternative liner demonstrations are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.proposal should the proposal become final in its current form. We submitted comments in July 2023.

MISO — In 2012, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards onsite at our Baldwin and Vermilion facilities' CCR surface impoundments. These violation notices remain unresolved; however, in 2016, the IEPA approved our closure and post-closure care plans for the Baldwin old east, east, and west fly ash CCR surface impoundments. We are working towards implementation ofhave completed closure activities at those closure plans.ponds at our Baldwin facility.

17

At our retired Vermilion facility, which was not potentially subject to the EPA's 2015 CCR rule until the aforementioned D.C. Circuit Court decision in August 2018, we submitted proposed corrective action plans involving closure of two CCR surface impoundments (i.e., the old east and the north impoundments) to the IEPA in 2012, and we submitted revised plans in 2014. In May 2017, in response to a request from the IEPA for additional information regarding the closure of these Vermilion surface impoundments, we agreed to perform additional groundwater sampling and closure options and riverbank stabilizing options. In May 2018, Prairie Rivers Network (PRN) filed a citizen suit in federal court in Illinois against our subsidiary Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (DMG), alleging violations of the Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges. In August 2018, we filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In November 2018, the district court granted our motion to dismiss and judgment was entered in our favor. Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment toIn June 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and argument was heard in November 2020.affirmed the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit. In April 2019, PRN also filed a complaint against DMG before the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB), alleging that groundwater flows allegedly associated with the ash impoundments at the Vermilion site have resulted in exceedances both of surface water standards and Illinois groundwater standards dating back to 1992. This matter isWe answered that complaint in July 2021. In July 2023, PRN filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the very early stages.case with prejudice, which the IPCB granted in August 2023 and closed the case.

15

In 2012, the IEPA issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards at the Newton and Coffeen facilities' CCR surface impoundments. We are addressing these CCR surface impoundments in accordance with the federal CCR rule. In June 2018, the IEPA issued a violation notice for alleged seep discharges claimed to be coming from the surface impoundments at our retired Vermilion facility, which is owned by our subsidiary DMG, and that notice has since beenwas referred to the Illinois Attorney General.

In December 2018,June 2021, the Sierra ClubIllinois Attorney General and the Vermilion County State Attorney filed a complaint in Illinois state court with an agreed interim consent order which the IPCB allegingcourt subsequently entered. Given the disposalviolation notices and storage of coal ash at the Coffeen, Edwards, and Joppa generation facilities are causing exceedancesenforcement action, the unique characteristics of the applicablesite, and the proximity of the site to the only national scenic river in Illinois, we agreed to enter into the interim consent order to resolve this matter. Per the terms of the agreed interim consent order, DMG is required to evaluate the closure alternatives under the requirements of the newly implemented Illinois Coal Ash regulation (discussed below) and close the site by removal. In addition, the interim consent order requires that during the impoundment closure process, impacted groundwater standards.will be collected before it leaves the site or enters the nearby Vermilion river and, if necessary, DMG will be required to install temporary riverbank protection if the river migrates within a certain distance of the impoundments. The interim order was modified in December 2022 to require certain amendments to the Safety Emergency Response Plan. In June 2023, the Illinois state court approved and entered the final consent order, which included the terms above and a requirement that when IEPA issues a final closure permit for the site, DMG will demolish the power station and submit for approval to construct an on-site landfill within the footprint of the former plant to store and manage the coal ash. These proposed closure costs are reflected in the ARO in our consolidated balance sheets (see Note 22 to the Financial Statements).

In July 2019, coal ash disposal and storage legislation in Illinois was enacted. The legislation addresses state requirements for the proper closure of coal ash ponds in the state of Illinois. The law tasks the IEPA and the IPCB to set up a series of guidelines, rules and permit requirements for closure of ash ponds. In March 2020, the IEPA issued its proposed rule, and we expect the rulemaking process should be completed by early 2021. Under the proposedfinal rule, which was finalized and became effective in April 2021, coal ash impoundment owners would be required to submit a closure alternative analysis to the IEPA for the selection of the best method for coal ash remediation at a particular site. The proposed rule does not mandate closure by removal at any site. Public hearingsIn May 2021, we filed an appeal in the Illinois Fourth Judicial District over certain provisions of the final rule and that case remains pending. Other parties have also filed appeals of certain provisions of the final rule. In October 2021, we filed operating permit applications for 18 impoundments as required by the proposedIllinois coal ash rule, were heldand filed construction permit applications for three of our sites in January 2022 and five of our sites in July 2022. One additional closure construction application was filed for our Baldwin facility in August 2020 and September 2020. We expect that the rule will be finalized by March 2021.2023.

For all of the above matters, if certain corrective action measures, including groundwater treatment or removal of ash, are required at any of our coal-fueled facilities, we may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Until the revisions to theThe Illinois coal ash rulemaking arerule was finalized in April 2021 and wedoes not require removal. However, the rule required us to undertake further site-specificsite specific evaluations required by each program weprogram. We will not know the full range of decommissioning costs, ofincluding groundwater remediation, if any, that ultimately may be required under those rules.the Illinois rule until permit applications have been approved by the IEPA. However, the currently anticipated CCR surface impoundment and landfill closure costs ascurrently reflected in our existing ARO balances,liabilities, reflect the costs of closure methods that our operations and environmental services teams believe are appropriate based on existing closure requirements and protective of the environment for each location. Once the IEPA acts on our permit applications, we will reassess the decommissioning costs and adjust our ARO liabilities accordingly.

Water

The EPA and the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate have jurisdiction over the diversion, impoundment and withdrawal of water for cooling and other purposes and the discharge of wastewater (including storm water) from our facilities. We believe our facilities are presently in material compliance with applicable federal and state requirements relating to these activities. We believe we hold all required permits relating to these activities for facilities in operation and have applied for or obtained necessary permits for facilities under construction. We also believe we can satisfy the requirements necessary to obtain any required permits or renewals.

Cooling Water Intake Structures — Clean Water Act Section 316(b) regulations pertaining to existing water intake structures at large generation facilities became effective in 2014. This provision generally requires that the location, design, construction and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. Although the rule does not mandate a certain control technology, it does require site-specific assessments of technology feasibility on a case-by-case basis at the state level.

1816

At this time, we estimate the cost of our compliance with the cooling water intake structure rule to be minimal at our Illinois plants due to the planned retirements of those plants by 2027. Our estimate could change materially depending upon a variety of factors, including site-specific determinations made by states in implementing the rule, the results of impingement and entrainment studies required by the rule, the results of site-specific engineering studies and the outcome of litigation concerning the rule and potential plant retirements.

Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs) — In November 2015, the EPA revised the ELGs for steam electricity generation facilities, which will impose more stringent standards (as individual permits are renewed) for wastewater streams, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD),FGD, fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control wastewaters. Various parties filed petitions for review of the ELG rule, and the petitions were consolidated in the Fifth Circuit Court. In April 2017, the EPA granted petitions requesting reconsideration of the ELG rule and administratively stayed the rule's compliance date deadlines. In August 2017, the EPA announced that its reconsideration of the ELG rule would be limited to a review of the effluent limitations applicable to FGD and bottom ash wastewaters and the agency subsequently postponed the earliest compliance dates in the ELG rule for the application of effluent limitations for FGD and bottom ash wastewaters from November 1, 2018 to November 1, 2020. Based on these administrative developments, the Fifth Circuit Court agreed to sever and hold in abeyance challenges to effluent limitations. The remainder of the case proceeded, and in April 2019, the Fifth Circuit Court vacated and remanded portions of the EPA's ELG rule pertaining to effluent limitations for legacy wastewater and leachate. In November 2019, the EPA issued a proposal that would extend the compliance deadline for FGD wastewater to no later than December 31, 2025 and maintains the December 31, 2023 compliance date for bottom ash transport water. The proposal also creates new sub-categories of facilities with more flexible FGD compliance options, including a retirement exemption to 2028 and a low utilization boiler exemption. The proposed rule also modified some of the FGD final effluent limitations. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. The EPA published thea final rule in October 2020. The final rule2020 that extends the compliance date for both FGD and bottom ash transport water to no later than December 2025, as negotiated with the state permitting agency. Additionally, the final rule allows for a retirement exemption that exempts facilities certifying that units will retire by December 2028 provided certain effluent limitations are met. Notification to the state agency on the retirement exemption is due by October 2021. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of the new ELG revisions, and Vistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA in December 2020. Notifications were made to Texas, Illinois and Ohio state agencies on the retirement exemption for applicable coal plants by the regulatory deadline of October 13, 2021. In March 2023, the EPA published its proposed supplemental ELG rule, which retains the retirement exemption from the 2020 ELG rule and sets new limits for plants that are continuing to operate. The finalproposed rule is subject toalso establishes pretreatment standards for combustion residual leachate, and we are currently evaluating the Environment Executive Order discussed above.impact of those proposed requirements. We submitted comments on the proposal in May 2023.

Radioactive Waste

The nuclear industry has developed ways to store used nuclear fuel on site at nuclear generation facilities, primarily using dry cask storage, since there are no facilities for reprocessing or disposal of used nuclear fuel currently in operation in the U.S. Luminant stores its used nuclear fuel on-site in storage pools or dry cask storage facilities and believes its on-site used nuclear fuel storage capability is sufficient for the foreseeable future.

Corporate Information

Vistra is a Delaware corporation whose common stock is listed and trade on the NYSE. Our principal executive office is located at 6555 Sierra Drive, Irving, Texas 75039. The telephone number for our principal executive office is (214) 812-4600. We maintain a website located at www.vistracorp.com.

Available Information

We file our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports with the SEC. You may obtain copies of these documents, free of charge, on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or on Vistra's website at www.vistracorp.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Vistra also posts important information, including press releases, investor presentations, sustainability reports, and notices of upcoming events on its website and utilizes its website as a channel of distribution to reach public investors and as a means of disclosing material non-public information for complying with disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Investors may be notified of postings to our website by signing up for email alerts and RSS feeds on the "Investor Relations" page. The information on Vistra's website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K.

19
17

Item 1A.RISK FACTORS

Summary of Risk Factors

The following summarizes the principal factors that make an investment in our company speculative or risky, all of which are more fully described in the Risk Factors section below. This summary should be read in conjunction with the Risk Factors section and should not be relied upon as an exhaustive summary of the material risks facing our business. The following factors could result in harm to our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects, among other impacts:

Market, Financial and Economic Risks

Our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows are affected by price fluctuations in the wholesale power market and other market factors beyond our control.

We purchase natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for our generation facilities, and higher than expected fuel costs or disruptions in these fuel markets may have an adverse impact on, our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We have retired, announced planned retirements of, and may be forced to retire or idle additional underperforming generation units which could result in significant costs and have an adverse effect on our operating results.

Our assets or positions cannot be fully hedged against changes in commodity prices and market heat rates,Market Heat Rates, and hedging transactions may not work as planned or hedge counterparties may default on their obligations.

Competition, changes in market structure, and/or state or federal interference in the wholesale and retail power markets, together with subsidized generation, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected ifby energy market participants continuecontinuing to construct new generation facilities or expandexpanding or enhanceenhancing existing generation facilities despite relatively low power prices and such additional generation capacity results in a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Our liquidity needs could be difficult to satisfy, particularly during times of uncertainty in the financial markets or during times of significant fluctuation in commodity prices, and we may be unable to access capital on favorable terms or at all in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions and limitations that could affect our ability to operate our business, our liquidity, and our results of operations, and any failure to comply with these restrictions could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, or effectively identify and invest in value-creating businesses, assets or projects, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses or otherwise hinder or delay our growth strategy.

Our ability to achieve the expected growth of our Vistra Zero portfolio, consisting of our solar generation, energy storage system,battery ESS, and other renewables development projects, areis subject to substantial capital requirements and other significant uncertainties.

Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions, or potential future legislation or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees, could have a material adverse affect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are required to pay the holders of TRA Rights for certain tax benefits, which amounts are expected to be substantial.

Regulatory and Legislative Risks

Our businesses are subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Our cost of compliance with existing and new environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us.

20

Pending or proposed laws or regulations, including those proposed or implemented under the Biden administration, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Changes to laws, rules or regulations related to market structures in the markets in which we participate may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operation, liquidity and financial condition.

We could be materially and adversely affected if current regulations are implemented or if new federal or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change, or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.

Litigation, legal proceedings, regulatory investigations or other administrative proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on us.

Operational Risks

Volatile power supply costs and demand for power have and could in the future adversely affect the financial performance of our retail businesses.

Our retail operations are subject to significant competition from other REPs, which could result in a loss of existing customers and the inability to attract new customers.

The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based security and integrity risk. Attacks on our infrastructure that breach cyber/data security measures could expose us to significant liabilities, reputational damage, regulatory action, and disrupt business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may suffer material losses, costs and liabilities due to operational risks, regulatory risks, and the risk of nuclear accidents arising from the ownership and operation of the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility.

The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations are capital intensive and involve significant risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

We may be materially and adversely affected by obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, corrective action, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR.

We are subject to, and may be materially and adversely affected by, the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality.

The outbreak of COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Changes in technology, increased electricity conservation efforts, or energy sustainability efforts may reduce the value of our generation facilities and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership of our Common Stock

Investor focus on environmental, social, and governance issues, including climate change and sustainability matters, could adversely affect our stock price.

21

Please carefully consider the following discussion of significant factors, events, and uncertainties that make an investment in our securities risky. These factors, in addition to others specifically addressed in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A), provide important information for the understanding of our forward-looking statements in this annual report on Form 10-K. If one or more of the factors, events and uncertainties discussed below or in the MD&A were to materialize, our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation or prospects could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if one or more of such factors, events and uncertainties were to materialize, it could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement in this annual report on Form 10-K. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects and the market price of our common stock in the future. The realization of any of these factors could cause investors in our securities (including our common stock) to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

Market, Financial and Economic Risks

Our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows generally are affected by price fluctuations in the wholesale power market and other market factors beyond our control.

We are not guaranteed any rate of return on capital investments in our businesses. We conduct integrated power generation and retail electricity activities, focusing on power generation, wholesale electricity sales and purchases, retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users and commodity risk management. Our wholesale and retail businesses are to some extent countercyclical in nature, particularly for the wholesale power and ancillary services supplied to the retail business. However, we do have a wholesale power position that is subject to wholesale power price moves, which may be significant. As a result, our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows depend in large part upon wholesale market prices for electricity, natural gas, uranium, lignite, coal, fuel, and transportation in our regional markets and other competitive markets in which we operate and upon prevailing retail electricity rates, which may be impacted by, among other things, actions of regulatory authorities.

Market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, coal and fuel oil are unpredictable and may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. Demand for electricity can fluctuate dramatically, creating periods of substantial under- or over-supply. Over-supply can occur as a result of the construction of new power generation sources, as we have observed in recent years. During periods of over-supply, electricity prices might be depressed. For example, the cost of electricity from renewable resources, such as solar, wind and battery storage systems, has dropped substantially in recent years. In many instances, energy from these sources are bid into the relevant spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, lowering the clearing price for all power wholesalers in such market. Also, at times there is political pressure, or pressure from regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over wholesale and retail energy commodity and transportation rates, to impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address volatility and other issues in these markets.

Extreme weather events can also materially impact power prices or otherwise exacerbate conditions or circumstances that result in volatility of power prices. For example, in February 2021, the U.S. experienced winter storm Uri and extreme cold temperatures in the central U.S., including Texas. This severe weather event substantially increased the demand for natural gas used in our electric power generation business, and the cold further limited the availability of renewable generation across the region contributing to extremely high market prices for natural gas and electricity, which resulted in substantial increases in the costs to procure sufficient fuel supply and increased collateral posting requirements. See "We may be materially and adversely affected by the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality" and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional discussion about the expected impacts of extreme weather, including the winter storm.

22

The majority of our facilities operate as "merchant" facilities without long-term power sales agreements. As a result, we largely sell electric energy, capacity and ancillary services into the wholesale energy spot market or into other wholesale and retail power markets on a short-term basis and are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital investments. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell any or all of the electric energy, capacity or ancillary services from those facilities at commercially attractive rates or that our facilities will be able to operate profitably. We depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices for power, capacity and fuel. Given the volatility of commodity power prices, to the extent we are unable to hedge or otherwise secure long-term power sales agreements for the output of our power generation facilities, our revenues and profitability will be subject to volatility, and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We purchase natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for our generation facilities, and higher than expected fuel costs, volatility, or disruption in these fuel markets may have an adverse impact on our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We rely on natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for the majority of our power generation facilities. Delivery of these fuels to the facilities is dependent upon the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties as well as upon the infrastructure (including mines, rail lines, rail cars, barge facilities, roadways, riverways and natural gas pipelines) available and functioning to serve each generation facility. As a result, we are subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facilities if no fuel is available at any price, if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure.

We have sold forward a substantial portion of our expected power sales in the next one to two years in order to lock in long-term prices. In order to hedge our obligations under these forward power sales contracts, we have entered into long-term and short-term contracts for the purchase and delivery of fuel. Many of the forward power sales contracts do not allow us to pass through changes in fuel costs or discharge the power sale obligations in the case of a disruption in fuel supply due to force majeure events or the default of a fuel supplier or transporter. Fuel costs (including diesel, natural gas, lignite, coal and nuclear fuel) are volatile, and the wholesale price for electricity does not always change at the same rate as changes in fuel costs, and disruptions in our fuel supplies may therefore require us to find alternative fuel sources at costs which may be higher than planned, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Long-term and short-term contracts are subject to risk of non-delivery or claims of force majeure, which may impact our ability to economically recover the value of the contract. In addition, we purchase and sell natural gas and other energy related commodities, and volatility in these markets may affect costs incurred in meeting our obligations. Further, any changes in the costs of natural gas, coal, fuel oil, nuclear fuel or transportation rates and changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power will affect our financial results. If we are unable to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices we consider favorable, or if we are unable to procure these fuels at all, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We also buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for all of our fuels fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. The price we can obtain for the sale of energy may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. This may have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity results from, among other factors:

demand for energy commodities and general economic conditions;
volatility in commodity prices and the supply of commodities, including but not limited to natural gas, coal and fuel oil;
volatility in market heat rates;
volatility in coal and rail transportation prices;
volatility in nuclear fuel and related enrichment and conversion services;
disruption or other constraints or inefficiencies of electricity, natural gas or coal transmission or transportation;
severe, sustained or unexpected weather conditions, including extreme cold, drought and limitations on access to water;
seasonality;
changes in electricity and fuel usage resulting from conservation efforts, changes in technology or other factors;
illiquidity in the wholesale electricity or other commodity markets;
transmission or transportation disruptions, constraints, inoperability or inefficiencies, or other changes in power transmission infrastructure;
development and availability of new fuels, new technologies and new forms of competition for the production and storage of power, including competitively priced alternative energy sources or storage;
23

changes in market structure and liquidity;
changes in the way we operate our facilities, including curtailed operation due to market pricing, environmental regulations and legislation, safety or other factors;
changes in generation capacity or efficiency;
outages or otherwise reduced output from our generation facilities or those of our competitors;
changes in electric capacity, including the addition of new supplies of power as a result of the development of new plants, expansion of existing plants, the continued operation of uneconomic power plants due to federal, state or local subsidies, or additional transmission capacity;
our creditworthiness and liquidity and the willingness of fuel suppliers and transporters to do business with us;
changes in the credit risk, payment practices, or financial condition of market participants;
changes in production and storage levels of natural gas, lignite, coal, uranium, diesel and other refined products;
natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts, embargoes and other catastrophic events; and
changes in law, including judicial decisions, federal, state and local energy, environmental and other regulation and legislation.

See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional discussion about the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

We have retired, announced planned retirements, and may be forced to retire or idle additional underperforming generation units which could result in significant costs and have an adverse effect on our operating results.

A sustained decrease in the financial results from, or the value of, our generation units has resulted in the retirement or planned retirement of, and ultimately could result in additional retirements or idling of, generation units. In recent years, we have generally operated certain of our lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets only during parts of the year that have higher electricity demand and, therefore, higher related wholesale electricity prices. In connection with the closure and remediation of retired generation units, we have spent, and may in the future spend, a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required closure and reclamation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance.

Our assets or positions cannot be fully hedged against changes in commodity prices and market heat rates, and hedging transactions may not work as planned or hedge counterparties may default on their obligations.

Our hedging activities do not fully protect us against the risks associated with changes in commodity prices, most notably electricity and natural gas prices, because of the expected useful life of our generation assets and the size of our position relative to the duration of available markets for various hedging activities. Generally, commodity markets that we participate in to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and heat rates have limited liquidity after two to three years. Further, our ability to hedge our revenues by utilizing cross-commodity hedging strategies with natural gas hedging instruments is generally limited to a duration of four to five years. To the extent we have unhedged positions, fluctuating commodity prices and/or market heat rates can materially impact our results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and financial condition, either favorably or unfavorably.

To manage our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations, we routinely enter into contracts to hedge portions of purchase and sale commitments, fuel requirements and inventories of natural gas, lignite, coal, diesel fuel, uranium and refined products, and other commodities, within established risk management guidelines. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed-price forward physical purchase and sale contracts, futures, financial swaps and option contracts traded in over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. Given our exposure to risks of commodity price movements, we devote a considerable amount of time and effort to the establishment of risk management policies and procedures, as well as the ongoing review of the implementation of these policies and procedures. Additionally, we have processes and controls in place that are designed to monitor and accurately report hedging activities and positions. The policies, procedures, processes and controls in place may not always function as planned and cannot eliminate all the risks associated with these activities, including unauthorized hedging activity, or improper reporting thereof, by our employees in violation of our existing risk management policies and procedures. For example, we hedge the expected needs of our wholesale and retail customers, but unexpected changes due to weather, natural disasters, consumer behavior, market constraints or other factors could cause us to purchase electricity to meet unexpected demand in periods of high wholesale market prices or resell excess electricity into the wholesale market in periods of low prices. As a result of these and other factors, the impacts of our commodity hedging activities and risk management decisions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

24

Based on economic and other considerations, we may not be able to, or we may decide not to, hedge the entire exposure of our operations to commodity price risk. To the extent we do not hedge against commodity price risk and applicable commodity prices change in ways adverse to us, we could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent we do hedge against commodity price risk, those hedges may ultimately prove to be ineffective. Additionally, there may be changes to existing laws or regulations that could significantly impact our ability to effectively hedge, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

With the continued tightening of credit markets that began in 2008 and expansion of regulatory oversight through various financial reforms, there has been a decline in the number of market participants in the wholesale energy commodities markets, resulting in less liquidity. Notably, participation by financial institutions and other intermediaries (including investment banks) in such markets has declined. Extended declines in market liquidity could adversely affect our ability to hedge our financial exposure to desired levels.

To the extent we engage in hedging and risk management activities, we are exposed to the credit risk that counterparties that owe us money, energy or other commodities as a result of these activities will not perform their obligations to us. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we could be forced to enter into alternative hedging arrangements or honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. Additionally, our counterparties may seek bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 or liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our credit risk may be exacerbated to the extent collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount due to us. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of our financial assets would not materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In such event, we could incur losses or forgo expected gains in addition to amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties. Market participants in the ISOs/RTOs in which we operate are also exposed to risks that another market participant may default on its obligations to pay such ISO/RTO for electricity or services taken, in which case such costs, to the extent not offset by posted security and other protections available to such ISO/RTO, may be allocated to various non-defaulting ISO/RTO market participants, including us.

We do not apply hedge accounting to our commodity derivative transactions, which may cause increased volatility in our quarterly and annual financial results.

We engage in economic hedging activities to manage our exposure related to commodity price fluctuations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts for commodities. These derivatives are accounted for in accordance with GAAP, which requires that we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value immediately recognized in earnings as unrealized gains or losses. GAAP permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts as normal purchases and sales. If designated, those contracts are not recorded at fair value. GAAP also permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship. If a hedge accounting relationship is used, a significant portion of the changes in fair value is not immediately recognized in earnings. We have elected not to apply hedge accounting to our commodity contracts, and we have designated contracts as normal purchases and sales in only limited cases, such as our retail sales contracts. As a result, our quarterly and annual financial results in accordance with GAAP are subject to significant fluctuations caused by changes in forward commodity prices.

Competition, changes in market structure, and/or state or federal interference in the wholesale and retail power markets, together with subsidized generation, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our generation and competitive retail businesses rely on a competitive wholesale marketplace. The competitive wholesale marketplace may be undermined by changes in market structure and out-of-market subsidies provided by federal or state entities, including bailouts of uneconomic plants, imports of power from Canada, renewable mandates or subsidies, as well as out-of-market payments to new generators.

Our power generation business competes with other non-utility generators, regulated utilities, unregulated subsidiaries of regulated utilities, other energy service companies and financial institutions in the sale of electric energy, capacity and ancillary services, as well as in the procurement of fuel, transmission and transportation services. Moreover, aggregate demand for power may be met by generation capacity based on several competing technologies, as well as power generating facilities fueled by alternative or renewable energy sources, including hydroelectric power, synthetic fuels, solar, wind, wood, geothermal, waste heat and solid waste sources. Regulatory initiatives designed to enhance and/or subsidize renewable generation increases competition from these types of facilities and out-of-market subsidies to existing or new generation can undermine the competitive wholesale marketplace, which can lead to premature retirement of existing facilities, including those owned by us.

25

We also compete against other energy merchants on the basis of our relative operating skills, financial position and access to credit sources. Electric energy customers, wholesale energy suppliers and transporters often seek financial guarantees, credit support such as letters of credit and other assurances that their energy contracts will be satisfied. Companies with which we compete may have greater resources or experience in these areas. Over time, some of our plants may become unable to compete because of subsidized generation, including public utility commission supported power purchase agreements, and the construction of new plants. Such new plants could have a number of advantages including: more efficient equipment, newer technology that could result in fewer emissions or more advantageous locations on the electric transmission system. Additionally, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws and regulations because of the newer technology utilized in their facilities or the additional resources derived from owning more efficient facilities.

Other factors may contribute to increased competition in wholesale power markets. We expect that we will continue to face intense competition from numerous companies, including new entrants or consolidation of existing competitors, in the industry. Certain federal and state entities in jurisdictions in which we operate have either enacted or are considering regulations or legislation to subsidize otherwise uneconomic plants and attempt to incent, including through certain tax benefits, the construction and development of additional renewable resources as well as increases in energy efficiency investments. Subsidies (or increases thereto) to our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, our retail marketing efforts compete for customers in a competitive environment, which impacts the margins that we can earn on the volumes we are able to serve. Further, with retail competition, it is easier for residential customers where we serve load to switch to and from competitive electricity generation suppliers for their energy needs. The volatility and uncertainty that results from such mobility may have material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, if fewer customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be greater than anticipated and, if market prices of fuel have increased, our costs will increase more than expected due to the need to go to the market to cover the incremental supply obligation. If more customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be lower than anticipated and, if market prices of electricity have decreased, our operating results could suffer.

Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if energy market participants continue to construct new generation facilities or expand or enhance existing generation facilities despite relatively low power prices and such additional generation capacity results in a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Given the overall attractiveness of certain of the markets in which we operate and certain tax benefits associated with renewable energy, among other matters, energy market participants have continued to construct new generation facilities or invest in enhancements or expansions of existing generation facilities despite relatively low wholesale power prices. If this market dynamic continues, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if such additional generation capacity results in an over-supply of electricity that causes a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Economic downturns would likely have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by sustained downturns or sluggishness in the economy, including lower prices for power, generation capacity and natural gas, which can fluctuate substantially. Increased unemployment of residential customers and decreased demand for products and services by commercial and industrial customers resulting from an economic downturn could lead to declines in the demand for energy and an increase in the number of uncollectible customer balances, which would negatively impact our overall sales and cash flows. Additionally, prolonged economic downturns that negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could result in future material impairment charges to write down the carrying value of certain assets to their respective fair values.

26

Our liquidity needs could be difficult to satisfy, particularly during times of uncertainty in the financial markets or during times of significant fluctuation in commodity prices, and we may be unable to access capital on favorable terms or at all in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us. We currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings that could negatively affect our ability to access capital on favorable terms or result in higher collateral requirements, particularly if our credit ratings were to be downgraded in the future.

Our businesses are capital intensive. In general, we rely on access to financial markets and credit facilities as a significant source of liquidity for our capital requirements and other obligations not satisfied by cash-on-hand or operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital or to access credit facilities, particularly on favorable terms, could adversely impact our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations or sustain and grow our businesses and could increase capital costs and collateral requirements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our access to capital and the cost and other terms of acquiring capital are dependent upon, and could be adversely impacted by, various factors, including:

general economic and capital markets conditions, including changes in financial markets that reduce available liquidity or the ability to obtain or renew credit facilities on favorable terms or at all;
conditions and economic weakness in the U.S. power markets;
regulatory developments;
changes in interest rates;
a deterioration, or perceived deterioration, of our creditworthiness, enterprise value or financial or operating results;
a downgrade of Vistra's or its applicable subsidiaries' credit ratings, or credit ratings of its issuances;
our level of indebtedness and compliance with covenants in our debt agreements;
a deterioration of the creditworthiness or bankruptcy of one or more lenders or counterparties under our credit facilities that affects the ability of such lender(s) to make loans to us;
credit, security, or collateral requirements, including those relating to volatility in commodity prices;
general credit availability from banks or other lenders for us and our industry peers;
investor and lender confidence in and sentiment of the industry, our business, and the wholesale electricity markets in which we operate;
a material breakdown in or oversight in effectuating our risk management procedures;
the occurrence of changes in our businesses;
disruptions, constraints, or inefficiencies in the continued reliable operation of our generation facilities and energy storage systems; and
changes in or the operation of provisions of tax and regulatory laws.

There are also increasing financial risks for companies that own and operate fossil fuel generation as institutional lenders have become more attentive to sustainable lending practices and some of them may elect not to provide funding for companies who produce or utilize fossil fuel energy or that have higher levels of GHG emissions. Additionally, the lending practices of institutional lenders have been the subject of intensive lobbying efforts in recent years, oftentimes public in nature, by environmental activists and others concerned about climate change not to provide funding for companies in the broader energy sector. Limitation on our access to, or increases in our cost of, capital could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings. As a result, we may not be able to access capital on terms (financial or otherwise) as favorable as companies that maintain investment-grade credit ratings or we may be unable to access capital at all at times when the credit markets tighten. In addition, due to our non-investment grade credit ratings, counterparties request collateral support (including cash or letters of credit) in order to enter into certain transactions with us.

A downgrade in long-term debt ratings generally causes borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors to shrink and could trigger liquidity demands pursuant to contractual arrangements. Future transactions by Vistra or any of its subsidiaries, including the issuance of additional debt, could result in a temporary or permanent downgrade in our credit ratings.

27

Our indebtedness and the proposed phaseout of LIBOR, or the replacement of LIBOR with a different reference rate, could adversely affect our ability in the future to raise additional capital to fund our operations. It could also expose us to the risk of increased interest rates and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy, or our industry, as well as impact our cash available for distribution.

As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $9.6 billion of total indebtedness and approximately $9.2 billion of indebtedness net of cash. Our debt could have negative consequences for our financial condition including:

increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions;
requiring a significant portion of our cash flows from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock or to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel purchases which require credit support;
limiting our ability to fund operations or future acquisitions;
restricting our ability to make distributions or pay dividends with respect to our capital stock and the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, in light of restricted payment and other financial covenants in our credit facilities and other financing agreements;
inhibiting the growth of our stock price;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, are at variable rates of interest;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.

We may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance or replace our existing indebtedness on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. Our failure to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. LIBOR is the interest rate benchmark used as a reference rate on a portion of our variable rate debt, including our revolving credit facility and interest rate swaps. It is unclear if LIBOR will cease to exist at that time or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. In November 2020, ICE Benchmark Administration (IBA), the administrator of LIBOR, with the support of the U.S. Federal Reserve and the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority, announced plans to consult on ceasing publication of USD LIBOR on December 31, 2021 for only the one-week and two-month USD LIBOR tenors, and on June 30, 2023 for all other USD LIBOR tenors. While this announcement extends the transition period to June 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve concurrently issued a statement advising banks to stop new USD LIBOR issuances by the end of 2021. In light of these recent announcements, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain and any changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or regulatory activity related to LIBOR's phaseout could cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or cease to exist. Although regulators and IBA have made clear that the recent announcements should not be read to say that LIBOR has ceased or will cease, in the event LIBOR does cease to exist, we may need to amend our credit agreements and other agreements with LIBOR as the referenced rate, which may result in interest rates and/or payments that do not correlate over time with the interest rates and/or payments that would have been made on our obligations if LIBOR was available in its current form. The Company will also need to consider new contracts and if they should reference an alternative benchmark rate or include suggested fallback language. Accordingly, we could be exposed to increased costs with respect to our variable rate debt, which could have an adverse impact on extensions of our credit and/or we might not be fully hedged on the variable rate exposure on our swapped indebtedness. Any such increased costs or exposure could increase our cost of capital and have a material adverse effect on us.

28

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions and limitations that could affect our ability to operate our business, or liquidity, and results of operations, and any failure to comply with these restrictions could have a material adverse effect on us.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions that could adversely affect us by limiting our ability to operate our businesses and plan for, or react to, market conditions or to meet our capital needs and could result in an event of default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures contain events of default customary for financings of this type. If we fail to comply with the covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures and are unable to obtain a waiver or amendment, or a default exists and is continuing, the lenders under such agreements or notes, as the case may be, could give notice and declare outstanding borrowings thereunder immediately due and payable. The breach of any covenants or obligations in certain agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, not otherwise waived or amended, could result in a default under the applicable debt obligations and could trigger acceleration of those obligations, which in turn could trigger cross defaults under other agreements governing our debt, and any such acceleration of outstanding borrowings could have a material adverse effect on us.

Certain of our obligations are required to be secured by letters of credit or cash, which increase our costs. If we are unable to provide such security, it may restrict our ability to conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We undertake certain hedging and commodity activities and enter into certain financing arrangements with various counterparties that require cash collateral or the posting of letters of credit which are at risk of being drawn down in the event we default on our obligations. We currently use margin deposits, prepayments and letters of credit as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices, and also based on our credit ratings and the general perception of creditworthiness in the markets in which we operate. In the case of commodity arrangements, the amount of such credit support that must be provided typically is based on the difference between the price of the commodity in a given contract and the market price of the commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in our being required to provide cash collateral and letters of credit in very large amounts. The effectiveness of our strategy may be dependent on the amount of collateral available to enter into or maintain these contracts, and liquidity requirements may be greater than we anticipate or will be able to meet. Without a sufficient amount of working capital to post as collateral, we may not be able to manage price volatility effectively or to implement our strategy. An increase in the amount of letters of credit or cash collateral required to be provided to our counterparties may have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, or effectively identify and invest in value-creating businesses, assets or projects, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses or otherwise hinder or delay our growth strategy.

As part of our growth strategy, including our desire to grow our retail platform, we may pursue acquisitions of assets or operating entities. This strategy depends on the Company's ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on favorable terms. Our ability to continue to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and access to capital. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company's cost of making acquisitions or limit the Company’s ability to make acquisitions at all. Any expense incurred in completing acquisitions or entering into joint ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate acquired businesses successfully could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits from any future acquisitions or joint ventures we may pursue. In addition, the process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may involve unknown risks, result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenses, and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the execution of our business strategy. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future acquisitions, it may impede the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy.

29

We have a substantial capital allocation plan intended for investments in renewable assets, including solar development projects and energy storage systems. As part of our business strategy, we plan to continually assess potential strategic acquisitions or investments in renewable assets, emerging technologies and related projects. Notably, the Company's ability to successfully develop our current renewables projects, or in the future acquire additional renewable assets, may be impacted by the demand for and viability of renewable assets generally, which may vary depending on availability of projects and financing, as well as public policy, financial and tax mechanisms implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable assets. Furthermore, various factors could result in increased costs or result in delays or cancellation of these projects, or the loss of, or declines in the value of, our investments in renewable projects. Risks may include both federal and state regulatory approval processes, new legislation impacting the industry, changes to federal income tax laws, economic events or factors, environmental and community concerns, availability of or requirements for additional funding, and enhanced competition. Should any of these factors occur, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected, or our future growth opportunities may not be realized as anticipated.

Our solar generation, energy storage system, and other renewables development projects are subject to substantial uncertainties.

Certain of our subsidiaries are in various stages of developing and constructing solar generation facilities and energy storage systems. Certain of these projects have signed long-term contracts or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity. Successful completion of the development of these projects depends upon overcoming substantial risks, including, but not limited to, risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, governmental approvals, regulatory changes, commissioning delays, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. Additionally, the increased demand for construction of renewables projects, such as energy storage systems and solar projects, may result in limited availability of qualified specialists, contractors, and necessary services and materials, which could lead to delays in and higher costs for the development and construction of our current and future planned projects.

In certain cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though the subsidiaries have not yet secured power purchase arrangements or other important elements for a successful project. If the project does not proceed as planned, our subsidiaries may remain obligated for certain liabilities even though the project will not be completed. Development is inherently uncertain and we may forgo certain development opportunities and we may undertake significant development costs before determining that we will not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalized costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project will be completed and reach commercial operation. If these development efforts are not successful, we may abandon a project under development and write off the costs incurred in connection with such project and could incur additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.

Circumstances associated with potential divestitures could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In evaluating our business and the strategic fit of our various assets, we may determine to sell one or more of such assets. Despite a decision to divest an asset, we may encounter difficulty in finding a buyer willing to purchase the asset at an acceptable price and on acceptable terms and in a timely manner. In addition, a prospective buyer may have difficulty obtaining financing. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including:

difficulties in the separation of operations and personnel;
the need to provide significant ongoing post-closing transition support to a buyer;
management's attention may be temporarily diverted;
the retention of certain current or future liabilities in order to induce a buyer to complete a divestiture;
the obligation to indemnify or reimburse a buyer for certain past liabilities of a divested asset;
the disruption of our business; and
potential loss of key employees.

We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we may encounter in divesting any asset, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

30

If our goodwill, intangible assets, or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We have significant goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Additionally, we review goodwill, our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Factors that may be considered include a decline in future cash flows, slower growth rates in the energy industry, and a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock.

We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and non-amortizing intangibles in the fourth quarter of 2020 and determined that no impairment was required. However, impairment assessments will be performed in future periods and may result in an impairment loss, which could be material.

Issuances or acquisitions of our common stock, or sales or dispositions of our common stock by stockholders, that result in an ownership change as defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §382 could further limit our ability to use our federal net operating losses to offset our future taxable income.

If an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the IRC (IRC §382) occurs, the amount of NOLs that could be used in any one year following such ownership change could be substantially limited. In general, an "ownership change" would occur when there is a greater than 50 percentage point increase in ownership of a company's stock by stockholders, each of which owns (or is deemed to own under IRC §382) 5 percent or more of such company's stock. Given IRC §382's broad definition, an ownership change could be the unintended consequence of otherwise normal market trading in our stock that is outside our control. Vistra acquired NOLs from its merger with Dynegy; however,Vistra's use of such attributes is limited under IRC §382 because the merger constituted an "ownership change" with respect to Dynegy. If there is an "ownership change" with respect to Vistra (including by the normal trading activity of greater than 5% stockholders), the utilization of all NOLs existing at that time would be subject to additional annual limitations based upon a formula provided under IRC §382 that is based on the fair market value of the Company and prevailing interest rates at the time of the ownership change.

Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions, or potential future legislation or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the U.S. federal, state and local governments. From time to time, legislative measures may be enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax positions regarding income or other taxes. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these legislative measures. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), enacted December 22, 2017, introduced significant changes to current U.S. federal tax law. These changes are complex and continue to be the subject of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the reaction to the federal tax changes by the individual states continues to evolve. Our interpretations and assumptions around U.S. tax reform may evolve in future periods as further administrative guidance and regulations are issued, which may materially affect our effective tax rate or tax payments.

U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will be sustained if challenged by relevant tax authorities and if not sustained, there could be a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Additionally, U.S. federal income tax reform and changes in other tax laws could adversely affect us. For example, President Biden has set forth several tax proposals that would, if enacted into law, make significant changes to U.S. tax laws. Such proposals include, but are not limited to (i) an increase in the U.S. corporate income tax rate and (ii) implementation of a 15% minimum tax on a corporation’s worldwide book income. Congress could consider some or all of these proposals in connection with tax reform to be undertaken by the Biden administration. It is unclear whether these or similar changes will be enacted and, if enacted, how soon any such changes could take effect. Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes or fees on various aspects of our operations. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals and other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

31

We may be responsible for U.S. federal and state income tax liabilities that relate to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale and Spin-Off.

Pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, the parties thereto have agreed to take certain actions and refrain from taking certain actions in order to preserve the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off and to indemnify the other parties to the extent a breach of such covenant results in additional taxes to the other parties. If we breach such a covenant (or, in certain circumstances, if our stockholders or creditors of our Predecessor take or took certain actions that result in the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off not to be preserved), we may be required to make substantial indemnification payments to the other parties to the Tax Matters Agreement.

The Tax Matters Agreement also allocates the responsibility for taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off between EFH Corp. and us. For periods prior to the Spin-Off, (i) Vistra is generally required to reimburse EFH Corp. with respect to any taxes paid by EFH Corp. that are attributable to us and (ii) EFH Corp. is generally required to reimburse us with respect to any taxes paid by us that are attributable to EFH Corp.

We are also required to indemnify EFH Corp. against certain taxes in the event the IRS or another taxing authority successfully challenges the amount of gain relating to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale or the amount or allowance of EFH Corp.'s net operating loss deductions.

Our indemnification obligations to EFH Corp. are not limited by any maximum amount. If we are required to indemnify EFH Corp. or such other persons under the circumstances set forth in the Tax Matters Agreement, we may be subject to substantial liabilities.

We are required to pay the holders of TRA Rights for certain tax benefits, which amounts could be substantial.

On the Effective Date, we entered into the TRA with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as the transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued beneficial interests in the rights to receive payments under the TRA (TRA Rights) to the first lien creditors of our Predecessor to be held in escrow for the benefit of the first lien creditors of our Predecessor entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Our financial statements reflect a liability of $450 million as of December 31, 2020 related to these future payment obligations (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements). This amount is based on certain assumptions as described more fully in the notes to the financial statements and the actual payments made under the TRA could be materially different than this estimate.

The TRA generally provides for the payment by us to the holders of TRA Rights of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we and our subsidiaries actually realize as a result of our use of (a) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (b) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the purchase and sale agreement, dated as of November 25, 2015 by and between La Frontera Ventures, LLC and Luminant, and (c) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA, plus interest accruing from the due date of the applicable tax return. The amount and timing of any payments under the TRA will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the amount and timing of the taxable income we generate in the future and the tax rate then applicable, our use of loss carryovers and the portion of our payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest.

Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge the tax benefits that are the subject of the TRA, recipients of the payments under the TRA will not be required to reimburse us for any payments previously made if such tax benefits are subsequently disallowed. As a result, in such circumstances, Vistra could make payments under the TRA that are greater than its actual cash tax savings. Any amount of excess payment can be used to reduce future TRA payments, but cannot be immediately recouped, which could adversely affect our liquidity.

Because Vistra is a holding company with no operations of its own, its ability to make payments under the TRA is dependent on the ability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to it. To the extent that Vistra is unable to make payments under the TRA because of the inability of its subsidiaries to make distributions to us for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid, which could adversely affect our results of operations and could also affect our liquidity in periods in which such payments are made.

The payments we will be required to make under the TRA could be substantial.

32

We may be required to make an early termination payment to the holders of TRA Rights under the TRA.

The TRA provides that, in the event that Vistra breaches any of its material obligations under the TRA, or upon certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combination or certain other changes of control, the transfer agent under the TRA may treat such event as an early termination of the TRA, in which case Vistra would be required to make an immediate payment to the holders of the TRA Rights equal to the present value (at a discount rate equal to LIBOR plus 100 basis points) of the anticipated future tax benefits based on certain valuation assumptions.

As a result, upon any such breach or change of control, we could be required to make a lump sum payment under the TRA before we realize any actual cash tax savings and such lump sum payment could be greater than our future actual cash tax savings.

The aggregate amount of these accelerated payments could be materially more than our estimated liability for payments made under the TRA set forth in our financial statements, which could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity.

We are potentially liable for U.S. income taxes of the entire EFH Corp. consolidated group for all taxable years in which we were a member of such group.

Prior to the Spin-Off, EFH Corporate Services Company, EFH Properties Company and certain other subsidiary corporations were included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax group of which EFH Corp. was the common parent (EFH Corp. Consolidated Group). In addition, pursuant to the private letter ruling from the IRS that we received in connection with the Spin-Off, Vistra will be considered a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group immediately prior to the Spin-Off. Under U.S. federal income tax laws, any corporation that is a member of a consolidated group at any time during a taxable year is severally liable for the group's entire federal income tax liability for the entire taxable year. In addition, entities that are disregarded for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be liable as successors under common law theories or under certain regulations to the extent corporations transferred assets to such entities or merged or otherwise consolidated into such entities, whether under state law or purely as a matter of federal income tax law. Thus, notwithstanding any contractual rights to be reimbursed or indemnified by EFH Corp. pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement, to the extent EFH Corp. or other members of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group fail to make any U.S. federal income tax payments required of them by law in respect of taxable years for which the Company or any subsidiary noted above was a member of the EFH Corp. Consolidated Group, the Company or such subsidiary may be liable for the shortfall. At such time, we may not have sufficient cash on hand to satisfy such payment obligation.

Our ability to claim a portion of depreciation deductions may be limited for a period of time.

Under the IRC, as amended, a corporation's ability to utilize certain tax attributes, including depreciation, may be limited following an ownership change if the corporation's overall asset tax basis exceeds the overall fair market value of its assets (after making certain adjustments). The Spin-Off resulted in an ownership change for the Company and it is expected that the overall tax basis of our assets may have exceeded the overall fair market value of our assets at such time. As a result, there may be a limitation on our ability to claim a portion of our depreciation deductions for a five-year period. This limitation could have a material impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA Rights. In addition, any future ownership change of Vistra following Emergence could likewise result in additional limitations on our ability to use certain tax attributes existing at the time of any such ownership change and have an impact on our tax liabilities and on our obligations under the TRA.

Regulatory and Legislative Risks

Our businesses are subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition and cash flows.

condition.
Our businesses operate in changing market environments influenced by various state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the restructuring of the energy industry, including competition in power generation and sale of electricity and natural gas. Although we attempt to comply with changing legislative and regulatory requirements, there is a risk that we will fail to adapt to any such changes successfully or on a timely basis. Compliance with, or changes to, the requirements under these legal and regulatory regimes, including those proposed or implemented under the Biden administration, may cause the Company may adversely impact our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

33

Our businesses are subject to numerous state and federal laws (including, but not limited to, PURA, the Federal Power Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act), changing governmental policy and regulatory actions (including those of the FERC, the NERC, the RCT, the MSHA, the EPA, the NRC, the DOJ, the FTC, the CFTC, state public utility commissions and state environmental regulatory agencies), and the rules, guidelines and protocols of ERCOT, CAISO, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM with respect to various matters, including, but not limited to, market structure and design, operation of nuclear generation facilities, construction and operation of other generation facilities, development, operation and reclamation of lignite mines, recovery of costs and investments, decommissioning costs, market behavior rules, present or prospective wholesale and retail competition, administrative pricing mechanisms (and adjustments thereto), rates for wholesale sales of electricity, mandatory reliability standards and environmental matters. We, along with other market participants, are subject to electricity pricing constraints and market behavior and other competition-related rules and regulations under PURA. Additionally, Ambit’s direct selling business (i) could be found by federal, state or foreign regulators not to be in compliance with applicable law or regulations, which may lead to our inability to obtain or maintain a license, permit, or similar certification and (ii) may be required to alter its compensation practices in order to comply with applicable federal or state law or regulations. Changes in, revisions to, or reinterpretations of, existing laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

As a result of the recent weather events in Texas there have been several announced efforts by both federal and state government and regulatory agencies to investigate and determine the causes of this event. We have received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General of Texas as well as a request for information from ERCOT related to this event and may receive additional inquiries. We are cooperating with these entities and are working to respond to these requests. Those efforts may result in changes in regulations that impact our industry and businesses including, but not limited to, additional requirements for winterization of various facets of the electricity supply chain including generation, transmission, and fuel supply; improvements in coordination among the various participants in the electricity supply chain during any future event; potential changes to the types of plans permitted to be marketed to residential customers; potential revisions to the way in which the ERCOT market compensates and incentivizes the continued operation of assets that only run periodically, including during this event or other times of scarcity; and other potential corrective actions that may be taken by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the RCT, or the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portion of the supply chain (i.e., fuel supply and wholesale pricing of generation, or allocating the financial impacts of market-wide load shed ratably across all retail market participants). Recently announced or future legal proceedings, regulatory actions, investigations, or other administrative proceedings involving market participants may result lead to adverse determinations or other findings of violations of laws, rules or regulations, any of which may impact the ability of market participants to satisfy, in whole or in part, their respective obligations. We are continuing to monitor and evaluate the impacts of this developing situation but at this time we cannot estimate the likelihood or impacts of any legislative or regulatory changes or actions (including enforcement actions that may be brought against various market participants) that may occur as a result of the event on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows,. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

Finally, the regulatory environment has undergone significant changes in the last several years due to state and federal policies affecting wholesale and retail competition and the creation of incentives for the addition of large amounts of new renewable generation. For example, changes to, or development of, legislation that requires the use of clean renewable and alternate fuel sources or mandate the implementation of energy conservation programs that require the implementation of new technologies, could increase our capital expenditures and/or impact our financial condition. Additionally, in some retail energy markets, state legislators, government agencies and other interested parties have made proposals to change the use of market-based pricing, re-regulate areas of these markets that have previously been competitive, or permit electricity delivery companies to construct or acquire generating facilities. Other proposals to re-regulate the retail energy industry may be made, and legislative or other actions affecting electricity and natural gas deregulation or restructuring process may be delayed, discontinued or reversed in states in which we currently operate or may in the future operate. If such changes were to be enacted by a regulatory body, we may lose customers, incur higher costs and/or find it more difficult to acquire new customers. These changes are ongoing, and we cannot predict the future design of the wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that the changing regulatory environment will have on our business.

34

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits and licenses from federal, state and local governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits and licenses can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit or license was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or licenses may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or licenses, or failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our delivery of electricity to our customers and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing permits and licenses, renewal of our existing permits or licenses could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including (a) failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure, (b) failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions, (c) local community, political or other opposition and (d) executive, legislative or regulatory action.

Our inability to procure and comply with the permits and licenses required for our operations, or the cost to us of such procurement or compliance, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws, may cause activities at our facilities to need to be changed to avoid violating applicable laws and regulations or elicit claims that historical activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in the case of any such violations, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments and obtain additional operating permits or licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our cost of compliance with existing and new environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including federal and state environmental agencies and/or attorneys general. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these regulatory requirements, we could be subject to administrative, civil or criminal liabilities and fines. Existing environmental regulations could be revised or reinterpreted, new laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, and future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur, including potential regulatory and enforcement developments related to air emissions, all of which could result in significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with existing requirements. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on us.

The EPA has recently finalized or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. In the future, the EPA may also propose and finalize additional regulatory actions that may adversely affect our existing generation facilities or our ability to cost-effectively develop new generation facilities. There is no assurance that the currently installed emissions control equipment at our lignite, coal and/or natural gas-fueled generation facilities will satisfy the requirements under any future EPA or state environmental regulations. Some of the recent regulatory actions, such as the EPA's proposed Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update, the ACE rule and any proposed or future actions to replace the ACE rule, and actions under the Regional Haze program, could require us to install significant additional control equipment, resulting in potentially material costs of compliance for our generation units, including capital expenditures, higher operating and fuel costs and potential production curtailments. These costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain or comply with any such approval or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we may be responsible for any on-site liabilities associated with the environmental condition of facilities that we have acquired, leased, developed or sold, regardless of when the liabilities arose and whether they are now known or unknown. In connection with certain acquisitions and sales of assets, we may obtain, or be required to provide, indemnification against certain environmental liabilities. Another party could, depending on the circumstances, assert an environmental claim against us or fail to meet its indemnification obligations to us, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

3518

Pending or proposed laws or regulations, or the repeal of existing beneficial laws or regulations, including those proposed or implemented under the Biden administration, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

Changes to laws, rules or regulations related to market structures in the markets in which we participate may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operation, liquidity and financial condition.

We could be materially and adversely affected if current regulations are implemented or if new federal or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change, that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.

There is attention and interest nationally and internationally about global climate change and how GHG emissions, such as CO2, contribute to global climate change. Over the last several years, the U.S. Congress has considered and debated several proposals intended to address climate change using different approaches, including a cap on carbon emissions with emitters allowed to trade unused emission allowances (cap-and-trade), a tax on carbon or GHG emissions, incentives for the development of low-carbon technology and federal renewable portfolio standards. In July 2019, the EPA finalized the ACE rule that developed emissions guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generating units. In January 2021, the ACE rule was vacated by the D.C. Circuit Court and remanded to the EPA for further consideration in accordance with the court’s ruling. The EPA may develop a more stringent and more encompassing rule to replace the ACE rule in its remand proceeding and has been directed by the Biden Administration to review this rule and others promulgated by the EPA during the Trump Administration. Prior to the vacatur and remand, states where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) had begun the development of their state plans to comply with the now-vacated ACE rule. In January 2021, the ACE rule was invalidated by the D.C. Circuit Court. In addition, a number of federal court cases have been filed in recent years asserting damage claims related to GHG emissions, and the results in those proceedings could establish adverse precedent that might apply to companies (including us) that produce GHG emissions. We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal and/or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from GHG emissions.

Additionally, in January 2021, President Biden issued written notification to the United Nations of the U.S.'s intention to rejoin the Paris Agreement, effective in February 2021. Although the Paris Agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions, it does include pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions, and various corporations, investors and U.S. states and local governments have previously pledged to further the goals of the Paris Agreement. Additionally, the Biden Administration has directed certain agencies to submit a plan to the National Climate Task Force to achieve a carbon-pollution-free electricity sector by 2035. The Company's plan to transition to clean power generation sources and reduce its GHG emissions may not be completed in this timeframe and we may not otherwise achieve our sustainability and emissions reduction targets as expected. Accordingly, we may be required to accelerate or change our targets, incur additional expenses, and/or adjust or cease certain operations as a result of newly implemented federal and/or state regulations to reduce future carbon emissions.

The Capacity Performance product in the PJM market and the Pay-for-Performance mechanism in ISO-NE could lead to substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Both ISO-NE and PJM operate a pay-for-performance model where capacity payments are modified based on real-time generator performance. Capacity market prices are sensitive to design parameters, as well as additions of new capacity. We may experience substantial changes in capacity income and non-performance penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Luminant's mining operations are subject to RCT oversight.

We currently own and operate, or are in the process of reclaiming, 12 surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for our electricity generation facilities. We also own or lease, and are in the process of reclaiming, two waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. The RCT, which exercises broad authority to regulate reclamation activity, reviews on an ongoing basis whether Luminant is compliant with RCT rules and regulations and whether it has met all the requirements of its mining permits. Any new rules and regulations adopted by the RCT or the Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining, which also regulates mining activity nationwide, or any changes in the interpretation of existing rules and regulations, could result in higher compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or cause a revocation of a mining permit. Any revocation of a mining permit would mean that Luminant would no longer be allowed to mine lignite at the applicable mine to serve its generation facilities.

36

Luminant's lignite mining reclamation activity will require significant resources as existing and retired mining operations are reclaimed over the next several years.

In conjunction with Luminant's announcements in 2017 to retire several power generation assets and related mining operations, along with the continuous reclamation activity at its continuing mining operations for its mines related to the Oak Grove and Martin Lake generation assets, Luminant is expected to spend a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required reclamation activities. For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $301 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its reclamation objectives.

Litigation, legal proceedings, regulatory investigations or other administrative proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are involved in the ordinary course of business in a number of lawsuits involving, among other matters, employment, commercial, and environmental issues, and other claims for injuries and damages. We evaluate litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these evaluations and estimates, when required by applicable accounting rules, we establish reserves and disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These evaluations and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from current evaluations and estimates. The settlement or resolution of such claims or proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us. We use appropriate means to contest litigation threatened or filed against us, but the litigation environment poses a significant business risk.

We are also involved in the ordinary course of business in regulatory investigations and other administrative proceedings, and we are exposed to the risk that we may become the subject of additional regulatory investigations or administrative proceedings. While we cannot predict the outcome of any regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding, any such regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding could result in us incurring material penalties and/or other costs and have a materially adverse effect on us.

Our retail businesses, which each have REP certifications that are subject to review of the public utility commissions in the states in which we operate, are subject to changing state rules and regulations that could have a material impact on the profitability of our business.

The competitiveness of our U.S. retail businesses partially depends on state regulatory policies that establish the structure, rules, terms and conditions on which services are offered to retail customers. Specifically, the public utility commissions and/or the attorney generals of the various jurisdictions in which the Retail segment operates may at any time initiate an investigation into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements. These state policies and investigations, which can include controls on the retail rates our retail businesses can charge, the imposition of additional costs on sales, restrictions on our ability to obtain new customers through various marketing channels and disclosure requirements, investigations into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements, can affect the competitiveness of our retail businesses. Any removal or revocation of a REP certification would mean that we would no longer be allowed to provide electricity service to retail customers in the applicable jurisdiction, and such decertification could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, state or federal imposition of net metering or renewable portfolio standard programs can make it more or less expensive for retail customers to supplement or replace their reliance on grid power. Our retail businesses have limited ability to influence development of these state rules, regulations and policies, and our business model may be more or less effective, depending on changes to the regulatory environment.

37

Operational Risks

Volatile power supply costs and demand for power have and could in the future adversely affect the financial performance of our retail businesses.
Our retail operations are subject to significant competition from other REPs, which could result in a loss of existing customers and the inability to attract new customers.
Cybersecurity attacks or technology systems failures could disrupt business operations and expose us to significant liabilities, reputational damage, loss of customers, and regulatory action.
The operation of our businesses is subject to information security and operational technology risks, including cybersecurity breaches and failure of critical information and operations technology systems. Attacks on our infrastructure that breach cyber/data security measures could expose us to significant liabilities, reputational damage, regulatory action, and disrupt business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
We may suffer material losses, costs and liabilities due to operational risks, regulatory risks, and the risk of nuclear accidents arising from the ownership and operation of the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility.
The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations are capital intensive and involve significant risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
We may be materially and adversely affected by obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, corrective action, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR.
We have been and may in the future be materially and adversely affected by the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality.
Events outside of our control, including an epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease may materially adversely affect our business.
Changes in technology, increased electricity conservation efforts, or energy sustainability efforts may reduce the value of our business, introduce new or emerging risks and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership of our Common Stock

Evolving expectations from stakeholders, including investors, on ESG issues, including climate change and sustainability matters, and erosion of stakeholder trust or confidence could influence actions or decisions about our company and our industry and could adversely affect our business, operations, financial results, or stock price.

We may not pay any dividends on our common stock in the future, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our share repurchase program.

19

Please carefully consider the following discussion of significant factors, events, and uncertainties that make an investment in our securities risky. These factors, in addition to others specifically addressed in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations (MD&A), provide important information for the understanding of our forward-looking statements in this annual report on Form 10-K. If one or more of the factors, events and uncertainties discussed below or in the MD&A were to materialize, our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation or prospects could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if one or more of such factors, events and uncertainties were to materialize, it could cause results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement in this annual report on Form 10-K. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and prospects and the market price of our common stock in the future. The realization of any of these factors could cause investors in our securities (including our common stock) to lose all or a substantial portion of their investment.

Market, Financial and Economic Risks

Our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows generally are affected by price fluctuations in the wholesale power market and other market factors beyond our control.

We are not guaranteed any rate of return on capital investments in our businesses. We conduct integrated power generation and retail electricity activities, focusing on power generation, wholesale electricity sales and purchases, retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users and commodity risk management. Our wholesale and retail businesses are to some extent countercyclical in nature, particularly for the wholesale power and ancillary services supplied to the retail business. However, we do have a wholesale power position that is subject to wholesale power price moves, which may be significant. As a result, our revenues, results of operations and operating cash flows depend in large part upon wholesale market prices for electricity, natural gas, uranium, lignite, coal, fuel oil, and transportation in our regional markets and other competitive markets in which we operate and upon prevailing retail electricity rates, which may be impacted by, among other things, actions of regulatory authorities.

Market prices for power, capacity, ancillary services, natural gas, coal and fuel oil are unpredictable and may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with its use. As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility due to supply and demand imbalances, especially in the day-ahead and spot markets. Demand for electricity can fluctuate dramatically, creating periods of substantial under- or over-supply. Over-supply can occur as a result of the construction of new power generation sources, as we have observed in recent years. During periods of over-supply, electricity prices might be depressed. For example, the cost of electricity from renewable resources, such as solar, wind and battery ESS, has dropped substantially in recent years. In many instances, energy from these sources are bid into the relevant spot market at a price of zero or close to zero during certain times of the day, lowering the clearing price for all power wholesalers in such market. Also, at times there is political pressure, or pressure from regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over wholesale and retail energy commodity and transportation rates, to impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address volatility and other issues in these markets.

Extreme weather events can also materially impact power prices or otherwise exacerbate conditions or circumstances that result in volatility of power prices. For example, in February 2021, the U.S. experienced Winter Storm Uri and extreme cold temperatures in the central U.S., including Texas. This severe weather event substantially increased the demand for natural gas used in our electric power generation business, and the cold further limited the availability of renewable generation across the region contributing to extremely high market prices for natural gas and electricity, which resulted in substantial increases in the costs to procure sufficient fuel supply and increased collateral posting requirements. Winter Storm Elliott, in December 2022, and Winter Storm Heather, in January 2024, were other examples of extreme weather across the U.S. that resulted in widespread wholesale power market volatility.

20

The majority of our facilities operate as "merchant" facilities without long-term power sales agreements. As a result, we largely sell electric energy, capacity and ancillary services into the wholesale energy spot market or into other wholesale and retail power markets on a short-term basis and are not guaranteed any rate of return on our capital investments. Consequently, there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell any or all of the electric energy, capacity or ancillary services from those facilities at commercially attractive rates or that our facilities will be able to operate profitably. We depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices for power, capacity and fuel. Given the volatility of commodity power prices, to the extent we are unable to hedge or otherwise secure long-term power sales agreements for the output of our power generation facilities, our revenues and profitability will be subject to volatility, and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

We purchase natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for our generation facilities, and higher than expected fuel costs, volatility, or disruption in these fuel markets may have an adverse impact on our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We rely on natural gas, coal, fuel oil, and nuclear fuel for the majority of our power generation facilities. Delivery of these fuels to the facilities is dependent upon the continuing availability of such fuels and financial viability of contractual counterparties as well as upon the infrastructure (including mines, rail lines, rail cars, barge facilities, roadways, riverways and natural gas pipelines) available and functioning to serve each generation facility, and geopolitical risk, including the current Russia and Ukraine conflict and the potential for additional U.S. sanctions against Russia or other potential restrictions on Russian energy deliveries. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance - Macroeconomic Conditions. As a result, we have experienced, and remain subject to the risks of disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at our generation facilities if no fuel is available at any price, if a counterparty fails to perform or if there is a disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure. Certain of our generation facilities rely on a limited number of counterparties, such as natural gas suppliers and railcar companies, to provide the necessary fuel. Disputes relating to or non-performance of contractual arrangements have resulted in, and may continue to result in adverse impacts to our costs, revenues, results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

As part of our strategy to mitigate the potential negative effects of commodity price volatility, we have sold forward a substantial portion of our expected power sales in the next few years in order to lock in long-term prices. In order to hedge our obligations under these forward power sales contracts, we have entered into long-term and short-term contracts for the purchase and delivery of fuel. Many of the forward power sales contracts do not allow us to pass through changes in fuel costs or discharge the power sale obligations in the case of a disruption in fuel supply due to force majeure events or the default of a fuel supplier or transporter. Fuel costs (including diesel, natural gas, lignite, coal and nuclear fuel) are volatile, and the wholesale price for power does not always change at the same rate as changes in fuel costs, and disruptions in our fuel supplies may therefore require us to find alternative fuel sources at costs which may be higher than planned, to find other sources of power to deliver to counterparties at a higher cost, or to pay damages to counterparties for failure to deliver power as contracted. Long-term and short-term contracts are subject to risk of non-delivery or claims of force majeure, which may impact our ability to economically recover the value of the contract. In addition, we purchase and sell natural gas and other energy related commodities, and volatility in these markets may affect costs incurred in meeting our obligations. Further, any changes in the costs of natural gas, coal, fuel oil, nuclear fuel or transportation rates and changes in the relationship between such costs and the market prices of power will affect our financial results. If we are unable to procure fuel for physical delivery at prices we consider favorable, or if we are unable to procure these fuels at all, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected. For example, supply challenges were among the primary drivers of the significant loss experienced in 2021 as a result of Winter Storm Uri.

We also buy significant quantities of fuel on a short-term or spot market basis. Prices for all of our fuels fluctuate, sometimes rising or falling significantly over a relatively short period of time. The price we can obtain for the sale of energy may not rise at the same rate, or may not rise at all, to match a rise in fuel or delivery costs. This may have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance. Volatility in market prices for fuel and power results from, among other factors:

demand for energy commodities and general economic conditions, including impacts of inflation and the relative strength or weakness of U.S. dollar compared to other currencies;
volatility in commodity prices and the supply of commodities, including but not limited to natural gas, coal and fuel oil;
volatility in Market Heat Rates;
volatility in coal and rail transportation prices;
volatility in nuclear fuel and related enrichment and conversion services;
21

transmission or transportation disruptions, constraints, congestion, inoperability or inefficiencies of electricity, natural gas or coal transmission or transportation, or other changes in power transmission infrastructure;
severe, sustained or unexpected weather conditions, including extreme cold, drought and limitations on access to water;
seasonality;
changes in electricity and fuel usage resulting from conservation efforts, changes in technology or other factors;
illiquidity in the wholesale power or other commodity markets;
importation of liquified natural gas to certain markets;
development and availability of new fuels, new technologies and new forms of competition for the production and storage of power, including competitively priced alternative energy sources or storage;
changes in market structure and liquidity;
changes in the way we operate our facilities, including curtailed operation due to market pricing, environmental regulations and legislation, safety or other factors;
changes in generation capacity or efficiency;
outages or otherwise reduced output from our generation facilities or those of our competitors;
changes in electric capacity, including the addition of new supplies of power as a result of the development of new plants, expansion of existing plants, the continued operation of uneconomic power plants due to federal, state or local subsidies, or additional transmission capacity;
local, regional, national, or global supply chain constraints or shortages;
our creditworthiness and liquidity and the willingness of fuel suppliers and transporters to do business with us;
changes in the credit risk, payment practices, or financial condition of market participants;
changes in production and storage levels of natural gas, lignite, coal, uranium, diesel and other refined products;
pandemics and epidemics (including the impacts thereto, or recovery therefrom), natural disasters, wars, sabotage, terrorist acts, embargoes and other catastrophic events; and
changes in law, including judicial decisions, federal, state and local energy, environmental and other regulation and legislation.

See "Economic downturns would likely have a material adverse effect on our businesses" for a discussion of potential risks arising from current U.S. and global economic and geopolitical conditions.

We have retired, announced planned retirements of, and may be forced to retire or idle additional underperforming generation units which could result in significant costs and have an adverse effect on our operating results.

A sustained decrease in the financial results from, or the value of, our generation units has resulted in the retirement or planned retirement of, and ultimately could result in additional retirements or idling of, generation units. We have operated certain of our lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets only during parts of the year that have higher electricity demand and, therefore, higher related wholesale electricity prices. In connection with the closure and remediation of retired generation units, we have spent, and may in the future spend, a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required closure and reclamation, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial and operating performance.

Our assets or positions cannot be fully hedged against changes in commodity prices and Market Heat Rates, and hedging transactions may not work as planned, or counterparties may default on their obligations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our hedging activities do not fully protect us against the risks associated with changes in commodity prices, most notably electricity and natural gas prices, because of the expected useful life of our generation assets and the size of our position relative to the duration of available markets for various hedging activities. Generally, commodity markets that we participate in to hedge our exposure to electricity prices and Market Heat Rates have limited liquidity after two to three years. Further, our ability to hedge our revenues by utilizing cross-commodity hedging strategies with natural gas hedging instruments is generally limited to a duration of four to five years. To the extent we have unhedged positions, fluctuating commodity prices and/or Market Heat Rates can materially impact our results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and financial condition, either favorably or unfavorably.

22

To manage our financial exposure related to commodity price fluctuations, we routinely enter into contracts to hedge portions of purchase and sale commitments, fuel requirements and inventories of natural gas, lignite, coal, diesel fuel, uranium and refined products, and other commodities, within established risk management guidelines. As part of this strategy, we routinely utilize fixed-price forward physical purchase and sale contracts, futures, financial swaps and option contracts traded in over-the-counter markets or on exchanges. Given our exposure to risks of commodity price movements, we devote a considerable amount of time and effort to the establishment of risk management policies and procedures, as well as the ongoing review of the implementation of these policies and procedures. Additionally, we have processes and controls in place that are designed to monitor and accurately report hedging activities and positions. The policies, procedures, processes and controls in place may not always function as planned and cannot eliminate all the risks associated with these activities, including unauthorized hedging activity, or improper reporting thereof, by our employees in violation of our existing risk management policies and procedures. For example, we hedge the expected needs of our wholesale and retail customers, but unexpected changes due to weather, natural disasters, consumer behavior, market constraints or other factors could cause us to purchase electricity to meet unexpected demand in periods of high wholesale market prices or resell excess electricity into the wholesale market in periods of low prices. As a result of these and other factors, the impacts of our commodity hedging activities and risk management decisions may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Based on economic and other considerations, including our available liquidity, we may not be able to, or we may decide not to, hedge the entire exposure of our operations to commodity price risk. To the extent we do not hedge against commodity price risk and applicable commodity prices change in ways adverse to us, we could be materially and adversely affected. To the extent we do hedge against commodity price risk, those hedges may ultimately prove to be ineffective. Additionally, there may be changes to existing laws or regulations that could significantly impact our ability to effectively hedge, which may have a material adverse effect on us.

With the continued tightening of credit markets that began in 2008 and expansion of regulatory oversight through various financial reforms, there has been a decline in the number of market participants in the wholesale energy commodities markets, resulting in less liquidity. Notably, participation by financial institutions and other intermediaries (including investment banks) in such markets has declined. Extended declines in market liquidity could adversely affect our ability to hedge our financial exposure to desired levels.

To the extent we engage in hedging and risk management, and power purchase agreement activities, we are exposed to the credit risk that counterparties that owe us money, energy or other commodities as a result of these activities will not perform their obligations to us. Should the counterparties to these arrangements fail to perform, we could be forced to enter into alternative hedging arrangements or honor the underlying commitment at then-current market prices. Additionally, our counterparties may seek bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 or liquidation under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our credit risk may be exacerbated to the extent collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount due to us. There can be no assurance that any such losses or impairments to the carrying value of our financial assets would not materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In such event, we could incur losses or forgo expected gains in addition to amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties. Market participants in the ISOs/RTOs in which we operate are also exposed to risks that another market participant may default on its obligations to pay such ISO/RTO for electricity or services taken, in which case such costs, to the extent not offset by posted security and other protections available to such ISO/RTO, may be allocated to various non-defaulting ISO/RTO market participants, including us.

We do not apply hedge accounting to our commodity derivative transactions, which may cause increased volatility in our quarterly and annual financial results.

We engage in economic hedging activities to manage our exposure related to commodity price fluctuations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts for commodities. These derivatives are accounted for in accordance with GAAP, which requires that we record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value with changes in fair value immediately recognized in earnings as unrealized gains or losses. GAAP permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts as normal purchases and sales. If designated, those contracts are not recorded at fair value. GAAP also permits an entity to designate qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship. If a hedge accounting relationship is used, a significant portion of the changes in fair value is not immediately recognized in earnings. We have elected not to apply hedge accounting to our commodity contracts, and we have designated contracts as normal purchases and sales in only limited cases, such as certain retail sales contract portfolios. As a result, our quarterly and annual financial results in accordance with GAAP are subject to significant fluctuations caused by changes in forward commodity prices.

23

Competition, changes in market structure, and/or state or federal interference in the wholesale and retail power markets, together with subsidized generation, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our generation and competitive retail businesses rely on a competitive wholesale marketplace. The competitive wholesale marketplace may be undermined by changes in market structure and out-of-market subsidies provided by federal or state entities, including bailouts of uneconomic plants, imports of power from Canada, renewable mandates or subsidies, as well as out-of-market payments to new generators. Multiple potential changes have been and are being evaluated by the PUCT and the Texas legislature for the ERCOT market, including the PCM that would align a required reliability standard with resource availability during higher-risk system conditions, the ultimate resolution of which is unknown.

Our power generation business competes with other non-utility generators, regulated utilities, unregulated subsidiaries of regulated utilities, other energy service companies and financial institutions in the sale of electric energy, capacity and ancillary services, as well as in the procurement of fuel, transmission and transportation services. Moreover, aggregate demand for power may be met by generation capacity based on several competing technologies, as well as power generation facilities fueled by alternative or renewable energy sources, including hydroelectric power, synthetic fuels, solar, wind, wood, geothermal, waste heat and solid waste sources. Regulatory initiatives designed to enhance and/or subsidize renewable generation increases competition from these types of facilities and out-of-market subsidies to existing or new generation can undermine the competitive wholesale marketplace, which can lead to premature retirement of existing facilities, including those owned by us.

We also compete against other energy merchants on the basis of our relative operating skills, financial position and access to credit sources. Electric energy customers, wholesale energy suppliers and transporters often seek financial guarantees, credit support such as letters of credit and other assurances that their energy contracts will be satisfied. Companies with which we compete may have greater resources or experience in these areas. Over time, some of our plants may become unable to compete because of subsidized generation, including public utility commission supported power purchase agreements, and the construction of new plants. Such new plants could have a number of advantages including more efficient equipment and newer technology that could result in fewer emissions or more advantageous locations on the electric transmission system. Additionally, these competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws and regulations because of the newer technology utilized in their facilities or the additional resources derived from owning more efficient facilities.

Other factors may contribute to increased competition in wholesale power markets. We expect that we will continue to face intense competition from numerous companies, including new entrants or consolidation of existing competitors, in the industry. Certain federal and state entities in jurisdictions in which we operate have either enacted or are considering regulations or legislation to subsidize otherwise uneconomic plants and attempt to incentivize, including through certain tax benefits, the construction and development of additional renewable resources as well as increases in energy efficiency investments. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 contains a number of tax credits and incentives relating to renewable projects and clean energy technologies such as nuclear energy. New entrants or existing competitors may find it more economical to develop new renewable projects or invest in clean energy technologies in which we would like to invest. Subsidies (or increases thereto) to our competitors could result in increased competition for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In addition, our retail marketing efforts compete for customers in a competitive environment, which impacts the margins that we can earn on the volumes we are able to serve. Further, with retail competition, it is easier for residential customers where we serve load to switch competitive electricity generation suppliers for their energy needs. The volatility and uncertainty that results from such mobility may have material adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, if fewer customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be greater than anticipated, and if market prices of fuel have increased, our costs will increase more than expected due to the need to go to the market to cover the incremental supply obligation. If more customers switch to another supplier than anticipated, the load we must serve will be lower than anticipated and, if market prices of electricity have decreased, our operating results could suffer.

24

Our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected by energy market participants continuing to construct new generation facilities or expanding or enhancing existing generation facilities despite relatively low power prices and such additional generation capacity results in a reduction in wholesale power prices.

Given the overall attractiveness of certain markets in which we operate and certain tax benefits associated with renewable energy, among other matters, energy market participants have continued to construct new generation facilities or invest in enhancements or expansions of existing generation facilities despite relatively low wholesale power prices. Assuming this market dynamic continues, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected if such additional generation capacity results in an over-supply of electricity that causes a reduction in wholesale power prices. Additionally, new or existing market participants without, or with less, fossil fuel operations may gain additional market share, or reduce our market share, due to evolving expectations and sentiments of key stakeholders, government, and regulatory authorities regarding our operations and activities.

Economic downturns would likely have a material adverse effect on our businesses.

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by sustained downturns or sluggishness in the economy, including lower prices for power, generation capacity and natural gas, which can fluctuate substantially. Increased unemployment of residential customers and decreased demand for products and services by commercial and industrial customers resulting from an economic downturn could lead to declines in the demand for energy and an increase in the number of uncollectible customer balances, which would negatively impact our overall sales and cash flows. The convergence of current global conditions, including sustained inflation, elevated interest rates, and the geopolitical climate, has and could lead to, or accelerate or exacerbate the occurrence of, a significant economic downturn, as well as changes in consumer and counterparty behavior, higher costs of capital, decreases in the value of our existing long-dated contracts, commodity price increases and volatility, supply chain shortages, and other adverse impacts to our business. Additionally, prolonged economic downturns that negatively impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could result in future material impairment charges to write down the carrying value of certain assets to their respective fair values.

Our liquidity needs could be difficult to satisfy, particularly during times of uncertainty in the financial markets or during times of significant fluctuation in commodity prices, and we may be unable to access capital on favorable terms or at all in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us. We currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings that could negatively affect our ability to access capital on favorable terms or result in higher collateral requirements, particularly if our credit ratings were to be downgraded in the future.

Our businesses are capital intensive. In general, we rely on access to financial markets and credit facilities as a significant source of liquidity for our capital requirements, hedging transactions and other obligations not satisfied by cash-on-hand or operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital or to access credit facilities, particularly on favorable terms, could adversely impact our liquidity and our ability to meet our obligations or sustain and grow our businesses and could increase capital costs and collateral requirements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our access to capital and the cost and other terms of acquiring capital are dependent upon, and could be adversely impacted by, various factors, including:

general economic and capital markets conditions, including changes in financial markets that reduce available liquidity or the ability to obtain or renew credit facilities on favorable terms or at all;
conditions and economic weakness in the U.S. power markets;
regulatory developments;
changes in interest rates;
a deterioration, or perceived deterioration, of our creditworthiness, enterprise value or financial or operating results;
a downgrade of Vistra's or its applicable subsidiaries' credit ratings, or credit ratings of its issuances;
our level of indebtedness and compliance with covenants in our debt agreements;
our ability to meet our sustainability targets in our secured credit facilities;
a deterioration of the creditworthiness or bankruptcy of one or more lenders or counterparties under our credit facilities that affects the ability of such lender(s) to make loans to us;
credit, security, or collateral requirements, including those relating to volatility in commodity prices;
general credit availability from banks or other lenders for us and our industry peers;
investor and lender confidence in and sentiment of the industry, our business, and the wholesale electricity markets in which we operate;
a material breakdown in or oversight in effectuating our risk management procedures;
the occurrence of changes in our businesses;
25

disruptions, constraints, or inefficiencies in the continued reliable operation of our generation facilities and battery ESS; and
changes in or the operation of provisions of tax and regulatory laws.

There are also increasing financial risks for companies that own and operate fossil fuel generation as institutional lenders or other sources of capital have become more attentive to sustainable financing practices and some of them may seek commitments on emission reduction targets or expected use or proceeds when providing funding to, or decline to provide funding for companies who produce or utilize fossil fuel energy or that have higher levels of GHG emissions. Our Vistra Operations Credit Agreement contains Sustainability Adjustments. These adjustments use baseline values from KPI Metrics and provide for decreases in the applicable credit spread adjustments and commitment fee rates if our reported metrics are a certain percentage below the baseline values, adjusted on a year-to-year basis. Conversely, if our reported metrics are a certain percentage above the baseline values, adjusted on a year-to-year basis, the applicable credit spread adjustments and fee rates are increased. Building in these adjustments to our credit agreement helps to show lenders we are committed to lowering our GHG emissions, but failing to meet the targets on a regular basis could be viewed negatively by such lenders. Additionally, the lending practices of institutional lenders have been the subject of intensive lobbying efforts in recent years, oftentimes public in nature, by environmental activists and others concerned about climate change not to provide funding for companies in the broader energy sector. Limitations on our access to, or increases in our cost of, capital could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we currently maintain non-investment grade credit ratings. As a result, we may not be able to access capital on terms (financial or otherwise) as favorable as companies that maintain investment-grade credit ratings or we may be unable to access capital at all at times when the credit markets tighten. In addition, due to our non-investment grade credit ratings, counterparties request collateral support (including cash or letters of credit) in order to enter into certain transactions with us.

A downgrade in long-term debt ratings generally causes borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors to shrink and could trigger liquidity demands pursuant to contractual arrangements. Future transactions by Vistra or any of its subsidiaries, including the issuance of additional debt, could result in a temporary or permanent downgrade in our credit ratings.

Our indebtedness could adversely affect our ability in the future to raise additional capital to fund our operations. It could also expose us to the risk of increased interest rates and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy, or our industry, as well as impact our cash available for distribution.

As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $14.4 billion of total indebtedness and approximately $10.9 billion of indebtedness net of cash. Our debt could have negative consequences for our financial condition including:

increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions;
requiring a significant portion of our cash flows from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock or to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities;
limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel purchases which require credit support;
limiting our ability to fund operations or future acquisitions;
limiting our ability to repurchase shares under the share repurchase program;
restricting our ability to make distributions or pay dividends with respect to our common and preferred stock and the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions to us, in light of restricted payment and other financial covenants in our credit facilities and other financing agreements;
inhibiting the growth of our stock price;
exposing us to the risk of increased interest rates because certain of our borrowings, including borrowings under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, are at variable rates of interest, only a portion of which are hedged;
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and
limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.

We may not be successful in obtaining additional capital for these or other reasons. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance or replace our existing indebtedness on favorable terms or at all upon the expiration or termination thereof. Our failure to obtain additional capital or enter into new or replacement financing arrangements when due may constitute a default under such existing indebtedness and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

26

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions and limitations that could affect our ability to operate our business, or liquidity, and results of operations, and any failure to comply with these restrictions could have a material adverse effect on us.

The agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, contain restrictions that could adversely affect us by limiting our ability to operate our businesses and plan for, or react to, market conditions or to meet our capital needs and could result in an event of default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures contain events of default customary for financings of this type. If we fail to comply with the covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and/or indentures and are unable to obtain a waiver or amendment, or a default exists and is continuing, the lenders under such agreements or notes, as the case may be, could give notice and declare outstanding borrowings thereunder immediately due and payable. The breach of any covenants or obligations in certain agreements and instruments governing our debt, including the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and indentures, not otherwise waived or amended, could result in a default under the applicable debt obligations and could trigger acceleration of those obligations, which in turn could trigger cross defaults under other agreements governing our debt, and any such acceleration of outstanding borrowings could have a material adverse effect on us.

Certain obligations are required to be secured by letters of credit, surety bonds, first liens, or cash, which increase our costs. If we are unable to provide such security, it may restrict our ability to conduct our business, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We undertake certain hedging and commodity activities and enter certain financing arrangements with various counterparties that require cash collateral or the posting of letters of credit which are at risk of being drawn down in the event we default on our obligations. We currently use margin deposits, prepayments, surety bonds, letters of credit and first liens as credit support for commodity procurement and risk management activities. Future cash collateral requirements may increase based on the extent of our involvement in standard contracts and movements in commodity prices, the use of first lien collateral, and also based on our credit ratings and the general perception of creditworthiness in the markets in which we operate. In the case of commodity arrangements, the amount of such credit support that must be provided is typically based on the difference between the price of the commodity in a given contract and the market price of the commodity. Significant movements in market prices can result in our being required to provide cash collateral and letters of credit in very large amounts. The effectiveness of our strategy may be dependent on the amount of collateral available to enter into or maintain these contracts, and liquidity requirements may be greater than we anticipate or will be able to meet. Without enough working capital or other sources of available liquidity to post as collateral, we may not be able to manage price volatility effectively or to implement our strategy. A material increase in the amount of letters of credit or cash collateral required to be provided to our counterparties may have a material adverse effect on us.

The Transactions (as defined below) remain subject to customary closing conditions which, if not satisfied or waived, would delay the Transactions or adversely impact our ability to complete the Transactions on the terms set forth in the Transaction Agreement (as defined below) or at all.

The completion of the Transactions remain subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions. These closing conditions may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the Transactions may not be completed.

If we are unable to complete the Transactions, we still will incur and will remain liable for significant transaction costs, including legal, accounting, advisory and other costs relating to the Transactions. Also, depending upon the reasons for not completing the Transactions, we may be required to pay Energy Harbor a termination fee of $225 million. If such a termination fee is payable, the payment could affect Vistra's share price.

Failure to consummate the Transactions as currently contemplated or at all could adversely affect the price of Vistra's common stock and our future business and financial results.

We cannot guarantee when or if these conditions will be satisfied or that the Transactions will be successfully completed. If the Transactions are not consummated, or are consummated on different terms than as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, we could be adversely affected and subject to a variety of risks associated with the failure to consummate the Transactions, or to consummate the Transactions as contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, including:

our stockholders may be prevented from realizing the anticipated potential benefits of the Transactions;
the market price of our common stock could decline significantly;
reputational harm due to the adverse public perception of any failure to successfully complete the Transactions;
27

under certain circumstances, we may be required to pay Energy Harbor a termination fee of up to $225 million or reimburse Energy Harbor's expenses up to $20 million; and
the attention of our management and employees may be diverted from their day-to-day business and operational matters and our relationships with our customers and suppliers may be disrupted as a result of efforts relating to attempting to consummate the Transactions.

Any delay in the consummation of the Transactions, any uncertainty about the consummation of the Transactions on terms other than those contemplated by the Transaction Agreement and any failure to consummate the Transactions could adversely affect our business, financial results and common stock price.

Following the completion of the Transactions, we may be unable to successfully integrate Energy Harbor's businesses with Vistra's nuclear and retail businesses and its Vistra Zero renewable and battery ESS projects or realize the anticipated synergies and other expected benefits of the Transactions on the anticipated timeframe or at all.

The Transactions involve the combination of Energy Harbor's nuclear and retail businesses with Vistra's nuclear and retail businesses and certain of Vistra Zero renewables and battery ESS projects under Vistra Vision. This new combination expects to benefit from certain cost savings, operating efficiencies and a growing renewables and battery ESS portfolio, some of which will take time to realize. We will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to the integration of our and Energy Harbor's business practices and operations into Vistra Vision. The potential difficulties we may encounter in building Vistra Vision include the following:

the inability to successfully combine our nuclear, retail, renewables and battery storage business and Energy Harbor's nuclear and retail businesses in a manner that permits Vistra Vision to achieve the cost savings anticipated to result from the Transactions, which would result in the anticipated benefits of the Transactions not being realized in the timeframe currently anticipated or at all;
the complexities associated with maintaining the second-largest competitive nuclear fleet in the U.S.;
the complexities of combining two companies with different histories, geographic footprints and asset mixes;
the complexities in combining two companies with separate technology systems;
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses, delays or conditions associated with the Transactions;
failure to perform by third-party service providers who provide key services for the combined company; and
performance shortfalls as a result of the diversion of management’s attention caused by completing the Transactions and integrating the companies' operations.

For all these reasons, it is possible that the integration process could result in the distraction of our management, the disruption of our ongoing business or inconsistencies in operations, services, standards, controls, policies and procedures, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with operators, vendors and employees, to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Transactions, or could otherwise materially and adversely affect its business and financial results.

We may not be able to complete future acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, successfully integrate future acquisitions into our business, or effectively identify and invest in value-creating businesses, assets or projects, which could result in unanticipated expenses and losses or otherwise hinder or delay our growth strategy.

As part of our growth strategy, including our desire to grow our retail platform, we may pursue acquisitions of assets or operating entities. This strategy depends on the Company's ability to successfully identify and evaluate acquisition opportunities and consummate acquisitions on favorable terms. Our ability to continue to implement this component of our growth strategy will be limited by our ability to identify appropriate acquisition or joint venture candidates and our financial resources, including available cash and access to capital. In addition, the Company will compete with other companies for these limited acquisition opportunities, which may increase the Company's cost of making acquisitions or limit the Company’s ability to make acquisitions at all. Any expense incurred in completing acquisitions or entering into joint ventures, the time it takes to integrate an acquisition or our failure to integrate acquired businesses successfully could result in unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to fully realize the anticipated benefits from any future acquisitions or joint ventures we may pursue. In addition, the process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may involve unknown risks, result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenses, and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the execution of our business strategy. If the Company is unable to identify and consummate future acquisitions, it may impede the Company's ability to execute its growth strategy.

28

Our ability to achieve the expected growth of our Vistra Zero portfolio, consisting of our solar generation, battery ESS, and other renewables development projects, is subject to substantial capital requirements and other significant uncertainties.

We have a substantial capital allocation plan intended for investments in renewable assets, including solar development projects and battery ESS. As part of our business strategy, we plan to continually assess potential strategic acquisitions or investments in renewable assets, emerging technologies and related projects. Notably, the Company's ability to successfully develop our current renewables projects, or in the future acquire additional renewable assets, may be impacted by the demand for and viability of renewable assets generally, which may vary depending on availability of projects and financing, as well as public policy, financial and tax mechanisms implemented at the state and federal levels to support the development of renewable assets. Various factors could result in increased costs or result in delays or cancellation of our current or future renewable projects, or the loss of, or declines in the value of, our investments in projects including, but not limited to, risks relating to siting, financing, engineering and construction, permitting, interconnection requests, federal and state regulatory approvals, new legislation or regulatory changes impacting the industry, commissioning delays, import tariffs, changes to federal income tax laws, economic events or factors, environmental and community concerns, availability of or requirements for additional funding, enhanced competition, or the potential for termination of the power sales contract as a result of a failure to meet certain milestones. Further, the recent proliferation of renewable projects has resulted in a large volume of interconnection requests submitted to grid operators, including the markets in which we operate, resulting in significant delays to the approval process and estimated completion dates for our projects and others. FERC and regional ISOs are working to address these backlogs, including with potential regulatory rule changes, which would change the interconnection process, the results of which are currently unknown. Additionally, the increased demand for construction of renewables projects, such as battery ESS and solar projects, and other labor market and supply chain constraints have resulted, and may continue to result, in limited availability of qualified specialists, contractors, and necessary services or materials, leading to delays in and higher costs for the development and construction of our current and future planned projects. Should any of these factors occur, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected, or our future growth opportunities may not be realized as anticipated.

While certain of our subsidiaries are in various stages of developing and constructing solar generation facilities and battery ESS and certain of these projects have signed long-term contracts or made similar arrangements for the sale of electricity, in other cases, our subsidiaries may enter into obligations in the development process even though the subsidiaries have not yet secured power purchase arrangements or other important elements for a successful project. If the project does not proceed as planned, our subsidiaries may remain obligated for certain liabilities even though the project will not be completed. Development is inherently uncertain and we may forgo certain development opportunities and we may undertake significant development costs before determining that we will not proceed with a particular project. We believe that capitalized costs for projects under development are recoverable; however, there can be no assurance that any individual project will be completed and reach commercial operation. If these development efforts are not successful, we may abandon a project under development and write off the costs incurred in connection with such project and could incur additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities.

Circumstances associated with potential divestitures could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

In evaluating our business and the strategic fit of our various assets, we may determine to sell one or more of such assets. Despite a decision to divest an asset, we may encounter difficulty in finding a buyer willing to purchase the asset at an acceptable price and on acceptable terms and in a timely manner. In addition, a prospective buyer may have difficulty obtaining financing. Divestitures could involve additional risks, including:

difficulties in the separation of operations and personnel;
the need to provide significant ongoing post-closing transition support to a buyer;
management's attention may be temporarily diverted;
the retention of certain current or future liabilities in order to induce a buyer to complete a divestiture;
the obligation to indemnify or reimburse a buyer for certain past liabilities of a divested asset;
the disruption of our business; and
potential loss of key employees.

We may not be successful in managing these or any other significant risks that we may encounter in divesting any asset, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

29

If our goodwill, intangible assets, or long-lived assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We have significant goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets recorded on our balance sheet. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. Additionally, we review goodwill, our intangible assets and long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Factors that may be considered include a decline in future cash flows, slower growth rates in the energy industry, and a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock.

We performed our annual assessment of goodwill and non-amortizing intangibles in the fourth quarter of 2023 and determined that no material impairment was required. However, impairment assessments will be performed in future periods and may result in an impairment loss, which could be material.

Issuances or acquisitions of our common stock, or sales or dispositions of our common stock by stockholders, that result in an ownership change as defined in Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §382 could further limit our ability to use certain tax attributes and our federal net operating losses to offset our future taxable income.

If an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the IRC (IRC §382) occurs, the amount of NOLs that could be used in any one year following such ownership change could be substantially limited. In general, an "ownership change" would occur when there is a greater than 50 percentage point increase in ownership of a company's stock by stockholders, each of which owns (or is deemed to own under IRC §382) 5 percent or more of such company's stock. Given IRC §382's broad definition, an ownership change could be the unintended consequence of otherwise normal market trading in our stock that is outside our control. Vistra acquired NOLs from its merger with Dynegy; however,Vistra's use of such attributes is limited under IRC §382 because the merger constituted an "ownership change" with respect to Dynegy. If there is an "ownership change" with respect to Vistra (including by the normal trading activity of greater than 5% stockholders), the utilization of all NOLs existing at that time would be subject to additional annual limitations based upon a formula provided under IRC §382 that is based on the fair market value of the Company and prevailing interest rates at the time of the ownership change. In addition, any ownership change with respect to Vistra could result in additional limitations on our ability to use certain tax attributes, including depreciation, existing at the time of any such ownership change and have an impact on our tax liabilities.

Tax legislation initiatives or challenges to our tax positions, or potential future legislation or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We are subject to the tax laws and regulations of the U.S. federal, state and local governments. From time to time, legislative measures may be enacted that could adversely affect our overall tax positions regarding income or other taxes. There can be no assurance that our effective tax rate or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these legislative measures. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA), enacted December 22, 2017, and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), enacted August 16, 2022, both introduced significant changes to current U.S. federal tax law. For example, the IRA includes the enactment of several new proposals, including, but not limited to (i) a corporate alternative minimum tax based on book income and (ii) additional requirements to qualify for enhanced renewable energy tax credits. These changes are complex and continue to be the subject of additional guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, the reaction to the federal tax changes by the individual states continues to evolve. Our interpretations and assumptions around U.S. tax reform may evolve in future periods as further administrative guidance and regulations are issued, which may materially affect our effective tax rate or tax payments.

U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and regulations are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that our tax positions will be sustained if challenged by relevant tax authorities and if not sustained, there could be a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

U.S. federal income tax reform and changes in other tax laws could adversely affect us. Additionally, states in which we operate or own assets may impose new or increased taxes or fees on various aspects of our operations. The passage of any legislation as a result of these proposals and other similar changes in U.S. federal income tax laws or the imposition of new or increased taxes or fees could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

30

Regulatory and Legislative Risks

Our businesses are subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have adversely impacted, and may in the future adversely impact, our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, and cash flows.

Our businesses operate in changing market environments influenced by various state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the restructuring of the energy industry, including competition in power generation and sale of electricity, natural gas, emissions and renewable energy certificates, and other commodities. Although we attempt to comply with changing legislative and regulatory requirements, there is a risk that we will fail to adapt to any such changes successfully or on a timely basis. Compliance with, or changes to, the requirements under these legal and regulatory regimes, including those proposed or implemented under the current presidential administration or during any future change of administration, or any repeal of existing beneficial laws or regulations, may adversely impact our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, and cash flows.

Our businesses are subject to numerous state and federal laws (including, but not limited to, Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act, the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Policy Act, the Atomic Energy Act, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act), changing governmental policy and regulatory actions (including those of the FERC, the NERC, the RCT, the MSHA, the EPA, the NRC, the DOJ, the FTC, the CFTC, state public utility commissions and state environmental regulatory agencies), and the rules, guidelines and protocols of ERCOT, CAISO, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM with respect to various matters, including, but not limited to, market structure and design, operation of nuclear generation facilities, construction and operation of other generation facilities, development, operation and reclamation of lignite mines, recovery of costs and investments, decommissioning costs, market behavior rules, present or prospective wholesale and retail competition, administrative pricing mechanisms (and adjustments thereto), rates for wholesale sales of electricity, mandatory reliability standards and environmental matters. We, along with other market participants, are subject to electricity pricing constraints and market behavior and other competition-related rules and regulations. Additionally, Ambit’s direct selling business (i) could be found by regulators not to be in compliance with applicable law or regulations, which may lead to our inability to obtain or maintain a license, permit, or similar certification and (ii) may be required to alter its compensation practices in order to comply with applicable federal or state law or regulations. Changes in, revisions to, or reinterpretations of, existing laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition and cash flows.

Extreme weather events have resulted, and in the future may result, in efforts by both federal and state government and regulatory agencies to investigate and determine the causes of such events. For example, as a result of Winter Storm Uri, we received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General of Texas as well as a request for information from ERCOT, NERC, and other regulatory bodies related to this event. Winter Storm Elliott, in December 2022, has also led to regulatory requests for information and notices of investigation by NERC, FERC, regional reliability entities, and independent market monitors for regions across the country. Such investigations have resulted, and in the future may result, in changes in laws or regulations that impact our industry and businesses including, but not limited to, additional requirements for winterization of various facets of the electricity supply chain including generation, transmission, and fuel supply; improvements in coordination among the various participants in the electricity supply chain during any future event; restrictions or limitations on the types of plans permitted to be offered to customers; potential revisions to the method of calculation of market compensation and incentives relating to the continued operation of assets that only run periodically, including during extreme weather events or other times of scarcity; and other potential legislative and regulatory corrective actions that may be taken. Previously announced or future legal proceedings, regulatory actions, investigations, or other administrative proceedings involving market participants may lead to adverse determinations or other findings of violations of laws, rules, or regulations, any of which may impact the ability of market participants to satisfy, in whole or in part, their respective obligations. The Texas Legislature, the PUCT, and ERCOT have implemented new requirements and continue to consider future market design and other rule changes in response to Winter Storm Uri and other extreme weather events.

31

Finally, the regulatory environment has undergone significant changes in the last several years due to state and federal policies affecting wholesale and retail competition and the creation of incentives for the addition of large amounts of new renewable generation. For example, changes to, or development of, legislation that requires the use of clean renewable and alternate fuel sources or mandate the implementation of energy conservation programs that require the implementation of new technologies, could increase our capital expenditures and/or impact our financial condition. Changes enacted by the Texas Legislature through Senate Bill 2627, the Powering Texas Forward Act, to administer Texas Energy Fund (TEF) programs, which include grants and loans to finance the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric facilities in Texas, may negatively impact our financial condition if it materially changes market fundamentals. Additionally, in some retail energy markets, state legislators, government agencies and other interested parties have made proposals to change the use of market-based pricing, re-regulate areas of these markets that have previously been competitive, or permit electricity delivery companies to construct or acquire generation facilities. Other proposals to re-regulate the retail energy industry may be made, and legislative or other actions affecting electricity and natural gas deregulation or restructuring process may be delayed, discontinued or reversed in states in which we currently operate or may in the future operate. If such changes were to be enacted by a regulatory body, we may lose customers, incur higher costs and/or find it more difficult to acquire new customers. These changes are ongoing, and we cannot predict the future design of the wholesale power markets or the ultimate effect that the changing regulatory environment will have on our business.

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, government permits and approvals.

We are required to obtain, and to comply with, numerous permits and licenses from federal, state and local governmental agencies. The process of obtaining and renewing necessary permits and licenses can be lengthy and complex and can sometimes result in the establishment of conditions that make the project or activity for which the permit or license was sought unprofitable or otherwise unattractive. In addition, such permits or licenses may be subject to denial, revocation or modification under various circumstances. Failure to obtain or comply with the conditions of permits or licenses, or failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, may result in the delay or temporary suspension of our operations and electricity sales or the curtailment of our delivery of electricity to our customers and may subject us to penalties and other sanctions. Although various regulators routinely renew existing permits and licenses, renewal of our existing permits or licenses could be denied or jeopardized by various factors, including (a) failure to provide adequate financial assurance for closure, (b) failure to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit conditions, (c) local community, political or other opposition and (d) executive, legislative or regulatory action.

Our inability to procure and comply with the permits and licenses required for our operations, or the cost to us of such procurement or compliance, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, new environmental legislation or regulations, if enacted, or changed interpretations of existing laws, may cause activities at our facilities to need to be changed to avoid violating applicable laws and regulations or elicit claims that historical activities at our facilities violated applicable laws and regulations. In addition to the possible imposition of fines in the case of any such violations, we may be required to undertake significant capital investments and obtain additional operating permits or licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Our cost of compliance with existing and new environmental laws could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to extensive environmental regulation by governmental authorities, including federal and state environmental agencies and/or attorneys general. We may incur significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with these regulatory requirements. If we fail to comply with these regulatory requirements, we could be subject to administrative, civil or criminal liabilities and fines. Existing environmental regulations could be revised or reinterpreted, new laws and regulations could be adopted or become applicable to us or our facilities, and future changes in environmental laws and regulations could occur, including potential regulatory and enforcement developments related to air emissions and CCR, all of which could result in significant additional costs beyond those currently contemplated to comply with existing requirements. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on us.

32

The EPA has recently finalized or proposed several regulatory actions establishing new requirements for control of certain emissions from sources, including electricity generation facilities. In the future, the EPA may also propose and finalize additional regulatory actions that may adversely affect our existing generation facilities or our ability to cost-effectively develop new generation facilities. There is no assurance that the currently installed emissions control equipment at our lignite, coal and/or natural gas-fueled generation facilities will satisfy the requirements under any future EPA or state environmental regulations. Some of the recent regulatory actions, such as the EPA's Good Neighbor Plan for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS, May 2023 proposal to regulated GHG emissions that would replace the ACE rule, and actions under the Regional Haze program, could require us to install significant additional control equipment, resulting in potentially material costs of compliance for our generation units, including capital expenditures, higher operating and fuel costs and potential production curtailments or plant retirements. These costs or operation impacts could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental regulatory approvals. If there is a delay in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, if we fail to obtain, maintain or comply with any such approval or if an approval is retroactively disallowed or adversely modified, the operation of our generation facilities could be stopped, disrupted, curtailed or modified or become subject to additional costs. Any such stoppage, disruption, curtailment, modification or additional costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, we may be responsible for any on-site liabilities associated with the environmental condition of facilities that we have acquired, leased, developed or sold, regardless of when the liabilities arose and whether they are now known or unknown. In connection with certain acquisitions and sales of assets, we may obtain, or be required to provide, indemnification against certain environmental liabilities. Another party could, depending on the circumstances, assert an environmental claim against us or fail to meet its indemnification obligations to us, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from greenhouse gas emissions.

There is continuing emphasis nationally and internationally on global climate change and how GHG emissions, such as CO2, contribute to global climate change. Over the last several years, the U.S. Congress has considered and debated several proposals intended to address climate change using different approaches, including a cap on carbon emissions with emitters allowed to trade unused emission allowances (cap-and-trade), a tax on carbon or GHG emissions, incentives for the development of low-carbon technology and federal renewable portfolio standards. In July 2019, the EPA finalized the ACE rule that developed emissions guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generation units. In January 2021, the ACE rule was vacated by the D.C. Circuit Court and remanded to the EPA for further consideration in accordance with the court's ruling. The D.C. Circuit Court's decision was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in West Virginia v. EPA, in which it held that the EPA does not have the authority to apply generation shifting in the regulation of GHG emissions. The judgment reversed the D.C. Circuit Court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion. The EPA is in the process of developing a more stringent and more encompassing rule to replace the ACE rule in its remand proceeding and has been directed by the Biden Administration to review this rule and others promulgated by the EPA during the Trump Administration. Prior to the vacatur and remand by the D.C. Circuit Court, states where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) had begun the development of their state plans to comply with the ACE rule. In addition, a number of federal court cases have been filed in recent years asserting damage claims related to GHG emissions, and the results in those proceedings could establish adverse precedent that might apply to companies (including us) that produce GHG emissions. We could be materially and adversely affected if new federal and/or state legislation or regulations are adopted to address global climate change that could require efforts that exceed or are more expensive than our currently planned initiatives or if we are subject to lawsuits for alleged damage to persons or property resulting from GHG emissions.

Additionally, in January 2021, President Biden issued written notification to the United Nations of the U.S.'s intention to rejoin the Paris Agreement, effective in February 2021. Although the Paris Agreement does not create any binding obligations for nations to limit their GHG emissions, it does include pledges to voluntarily limit or reduce future emissions, and various corporations, investors and U.S. states and local governments have previously pledged to further the goals of the Paris Agreement. Additionally, the Biden Administration has directed certain agencies to submit a plan to the National Climate Task Force to achieve a carbon-pollution-free electricity sector by 2035. The Company's plan to transition to clean power generation sources and reduce its GHG emissions may not be completed in this timeframe and we may not otherwise achieve our sustainability and emissions reduction targets as expected. Accordingly, we may be required to accelerate or change our targets, incur additional expenses, and/or adjust or cease certain operations as a result of newly implemented federal and/or state regulations to reduce future carbon emissions.

33

Luminant's mining operations are subject to RCT oversight.

We currently own and operate, or are in the process of reclaiming, various surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for our electricity generation facilities. We also own or lease, and are in the process of reclaiming, multiple waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. The RCT, which exercises broad authority to regulate reclamation activity, reviews on an ongoing basis whether Luminant is compliant with RCT rules and regulations and whether it has met all the requirements of its mining permits in Texas. Any new rules and regulations adopted by the RCT or the Department of Interior Office of Surface Mining, which also regulates mining activity nationwide, or any changes in the interpretation of existing rules and regulations, could result in higher compliance costs or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition or cause a revocation of a mining permit. Any revocation of a mining permit would mean that Luminant would no longer be allowed to mine lignite at the applicable mine to serve its generation facilities.

Luminant's lignite mining reclamation activity will require significant resources as existing and retired mining operations are reclaimed over the next several years.

In conjunction with Luminant's announcements in 2017 to retire several power generation assets and related mining operations, along with the continuous reclamation activity at its continuing mining operations for its mines related to the Oak Grove generation asset, Luminant is expected to spend a significant amount of money, internal resources and time to complete the required reclamation activities. For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $245 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its mining reclamation objectives.

Litigation, legal proceedings, regulatory investigations or other administrative proceedings could expose us to significant liabilities and reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are involved in the ordinary course of business in a number of lawsuits involving, among other matters, employment, commercial, and environmental issues, and other claims for injuries and damages. We evaluate litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, potential losses. Based on these evaluations and estimates, when required by applicable accounting rules, we establish reserves and disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These evaluations and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of judgment. Actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from current evaluations and estimates. The settlement or resolution of such claims or proceedings may have a material adverse effect on us. We use appropriate means to contest litigation threatened or filed against us, but the litigation environment poses a significant business risk.

We are also involved in the ordinary course of business in regulatory investigations and other administrative proceedings, and we are exposed to the risk of additional regulatory investigations or administrative proceedings. As we adopt new technologies, like artificial intelligence (AI), there is a risk that the content, analyses, recommendations, or judgments that AI applications assist in producing are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, biased, or infringe on other's rights or property interests. Any such regulatory investigation or administrative proceeding could result in us incurring penalties and other costs which may have a material adverse effect on us.

34

Our retail businesses, which each have REP certifications that are subject to review of the public utility commissions in the states in which we operate, are subject to changing state rules and regulations that could have a material impact on the profitability of our business.

The competitiveness of our U.S. retail businesses partially depends on state regulatory policies that establish the structure, rules, terms and conditions on which services are offered to retail customers. Specifically, the public utility commissions and/or the attorney generals of the various jurisdictions in which the Retail segment operates may at any time initiate an investigation into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements. These state policies and investigations, which can include controls on the retail rates our retail businesses can charge, the imposition of additional costs on sales, restrictions on our ability to obtain new customers through various marketing channels and disclosure requirements, investigations into whether our retail operations comply with certain commission rules or state laws and whether we have met the requirements for REP certification, including financial requirements, can affect the competitiveness of our retail businesses. Any removal or revocation of a REP certification would mean that we would no longer be allowed to provide electricity service to retail customers in the applicable jurisdiction, and such decertification could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, state or federal imposition of net metering or renewable portfolio standard programs can make it more or less expensive for retail customers to supplement or replace their reliance on grid power. Our retail businesses may have limited ability to influence development of these state rules, regulations and policies, and our business model may be more or less effective, depending on changes to the regulatory environment.

Operational Risks

Volatile power supply costs and demand for power have and could in the future adversely affect the financial performance of our retail businesses.

Although we are the primary provider of our retail businesses' wholesale electricity supply requirements, our retail businesses purchase a portion of their supply requirements from third parties. As a result, the financial performance of our retail business depends on their ability to obtain adequate supplies of electric generation from third parties at prices below the prices they charge their customers. Consequently, our earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected in any period in which the retail businesses' wholesale electricity supply costs rise at a greater rate than the rates they charge to customers. The price of wholesale electricity supply purchases associated with the retail businesses' energy commitments can be different than that reflected in the rates charged to customers due to, among other factors:

varying supply procurement contracts used and the timing of entering into related contracts;
subsequent changes in the overall price of natural gas;
daily, monthly or seasonal fluctuations in the price of natural gas relative to the 12-month forward prices;
transmission constraints and the Company's ability to move power to our customers;
out-of-market payments, uplifts, or other non-pass through charges, and
changes in market heat rate.Market Heat Rate.

The retail businesses' earnings and cash flows could also be adversely affected in any period in which their customers' actual usage of electricity significantly varies from the forecasted usage, which could occur due to, among other factors, weather events,transmission and distribution outages, demand-side management programs, competition and economic conditions. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.conditions, or extreme weather events, such as Winter Storm Uri in February 2021.

Our retail operations are subject to significant competition from other REPs, which could result in a loss of existing customers and the inability to attract new customers.

We operate in a very competitive retail market and, as a result,where our retail operation faces significant competition for customers. We believe our brands are viewed favorably in the retail electricitythese markets, in which we operate, but despite our commitment to providing superior customer service and innovative products, customer sentiment toward our brands, including by comparison to our competitors' brands, depends on certain factors beyond our control. For example, competitor REPs may offer different products, lower electricity prices and other incentives, which, despite our long-standing relationship with many customers, may attract customers away from us. If we are unable to successfully compete with competitors in the retail market it is possible our retail customer counts could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

35

As we try to grow our retail business and operate our business strategy, we compete with various other REPs that may have certain advantages over us. For example, in new markets, our principal competitor for new customers may be the incumbent REP, which has the advantage of long-standing relationships with its customers, including well-known brand recognition. In addition to competition from the incumbent REP, we may face competition from a number of other energy service providers, other energy industry participants, or nationally branded providers of consumer products and services who may develop businesses that will compete with us. Some of these competitors or potential competitors may be larger than we are or have greater resources or access to capital than we have. If there is inadequate potential margin inCompetitors may also incorporate AI into their businesses, services, and products more quickly or more successfully than we do. In retail electricity markets with substantial competition, to overcome the adverse effect of relatively high customer acquisition costs in such markets,may outweigh the potential margin and it may not be profitable for us to compete in these markets.

38

Our retail operations rely on the infrastructure of local utilities or independent transmission system operators to provide electricity to, and to obtain information about, our customers. Any infrastructure failure could negatively impact customer satisfaction and could have a material adverse effect on us.

The substantial majority of our retail operations depend on transmission and distribution facilities owned and operated by unaffiliated utilities to deliver the electricity that we sell to our customers. If transmission capacity is inadequate, our ability to sell and deliver electricity may be hindered and we may have to forgo sales or buy more expensive wholesale electricity than is available in the capacity-constrained area or, with respect to capacity performance in PJM and performance incentives in ISO-NE, we may be subject to significant penalties. For example, during some periods, transmission access is constrained in some areas of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex, where we have a significant number of customers. The cost to provide service to these customers may exceed the cost to provide service to other customers, resulting in lower operating margins. In addition, any infrastructure failure that interrupts or impairs delivery of electricity to our customers could negatively impact customer satisfaction with our service. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on us.

The operation of our businesses is subject to cyber-based securityCybersecurity attacks or technology systems failures could disrupt business operations and integrity risk. Attacks on our infrastructure that breach cyber/data security measures could expose us to significant liabilities, reputational damage, loss of customers, and regulatory action, and disrupt business operations, which could have a material adverse effect on us.action.

Numerous functions affecting the efficient operation of ourOur businesses are dependentdepend on the secure and reliable storage, processing and communication of electronic data and the use of sophisticated computer hardware and software systems and much of our information technology infrastructure is connected (directly or indirectly) to the internet.systems. Our information technology systems and infrastructure, and those of our vendors and suppliers, are susceptible to damage, disruptions,face constant threats that have in the past and could in the future compromise data confidentiality, integrity, or shutdowns due to power outages, hardware failures, programming errors, defects or other vulnerabilities, cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, malware attacks, computer viruses, theft, misconduct by employees or other insiders, telecommunications failures, misuse, human errors or other catastrophic events.availability. While we have controls in place designed to protect our information technology (IT) infrastructure, such breaches and threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated and complex, change frequently and may be difficult to detect. Any suchrequiring the continuing evolution of our program. A breach disruption or similar event that impairs our information technology infrastructureIT incident could disruptinterrupt normal business operations and affect our ability to controluse our generation assets, access retail customer information, and limitor communication with third parties,systems, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

As part of the continuing development of newPotential disruptions from cyber/data and modified reliability standards, the FERC has approved changesphysical security breaches to its Critical Infrastructure Protection reliability standards and has established standards for assets identified as "critical cyber assets." Underassets" that interrupt the Energy Policy Actdelivery of 2005,power to the FERC can imposeBulk Electric System could incur penalties (upof up to $1 million per day, per violation)violation for failure to comply with mandatory electric reliability standards including standards to protectby FERC under the power system against potential disruptions from cyber/data and physical security breaches.Energy Policy Act of 2005.

Further, our retail business requires us to regularly access, collect, store, and transmit customer data, including sensitive customer data in the ordinary course of business. Concerns aboutdata. New data privacy have led toand data protection laws and regulations, increased regulationenforcement, and other government actions that could impact our businesses. Examples of sensitive customer data are names, addresses, account information, historical electricity usage, expected patterns of use, payment history, credit bureau data, creditbusinesses and debit card account numbers, drivers' license numbers, social security numbersfailure to comply with them could adversely affect our business and bank account information.financial results. Our retail business may need to provide access to customer data, including sensitive customer data, to vendorsthird parties and service providers who require access to this information in order to provide services, such as call center operations, tooperations. Under new data protection laws, in certain circumstances, Vistra could incur liability for a third-party or service provider's misuse or loss of the retail business. data.

36

Although we take precautions to protect the sensitive customer data thatour infrastructure, we are requiredhave been, and will likely continue to collect in order to conduct our business, if a significant breach of our information technology systems were to occur, the reputation of our retail business may be adversely affected, customer confidence may be diminished, and our retail business may be, subject to substantial legalattempts at phishing and other cybersecurity intrusions. International conflict increases the risk of state-sponsored cyber threats and escalated use of cybercriminal and cyber-espionage activities. In particular, the current geopolitical climate has further escalated cybersecurity risk, with various government agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the U.S. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency, issuing warnings of increased cyber threats, particularly for U.S. critical infrastructure. As of the date of this report, the Company has not identified a cyber/data event causing any material operational, reputational or regulatory claims,financial impact. However, we recognize the growing threat within the general marketplace and our industry, especially as generative AI becomes more widely used by threat actors. There is no assurance that we will be able to prevent any of which may contribute tosuch impacts in the lossfuture. In the event of customers and have a material adverse effect on us. Any loss ofcyber breach, critical operational capabilities to support our generation, commercial, or retail operations could be disrupted or lost. Additionally, customer, confidential, or proprietary data through a breach, unauthorized access, disruption, misusecould be compromised, misused, or disclosureinappropriately disclosed. If critical operational capabilities or data were impacted, it could adversely affect our reputation, diminish customer confidence, expose us to material legal or regulatory claims, and impair our ability to execute our business strategy, or impact our results of operation or financial condition, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, we may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for our information technology infrastructure. We cannot provide any assurance that such events and impacts will not be material in the future, and ourOur efforts to deter, identify, and mitigate future breaches may require additional, significant capital and operating costs and may not be successful.

39

We may suffer material losses, costs and liabilities due to operation risks, regulatory risks, and the risk of nuclear accidents arising from the ownership and operation of the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility.

We own and operate a nuclear generation facility in Glen Rose, Texas (Comanche Peak Facility). The ownership and operation of a nuclear generation facility involves certain risks. These risks include:

unscheduled outages or unexpected costs due to equipment, mechanical, structural, cybersecurity, insider threat, third-party compromise or other problems;
inadequacy or lapses in maintenance protocols;
the impairment of reactor operation and safety systems due to human error or force majeure;
the costs of, and liabilities relating to, storage, handling, treatment, transport, release, use and disposal of radioactive materials;
the costs of procuring nuclear fuel;fuel, including impacts from restrictions on imports from Russia or China (see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance– Macroeconomic Conditions);
the costs of storing and maintaining spent nuclear fuel at our on-site dry cask storage facility;
terrorist or cybersecurity attacks by nation-states or other threat actors and the cost to protect and recover against any such attack;
the impact of a natural disaster;
limitations on the amounts and types of insurance coverage commercially available; and
uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of modifying or decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their useful lives.

Any prolonged unavailability of the Comanche Peak Facility could have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, cash flows, financial position and reputation. The following are among the more significant related risks:

Operational Risk — Operations at any generation facility could degrade to the point where the facility would have to be shut down. If such degradations were to occur at the Comanche Peak Facility, the process of identifying and correcting the causes of the operational downgrade to return the facility to operation could require significant time and expense, resulting in both lost revenue and increased fuel and purchased power expense to meet supply commitments. Furthermore, a shut-down or failure at any other nuclear generation facility could cause regulators to require a shut-down or reduced availability at the Comanche Peak Facility.
Regulatory Risk — The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with the Atomic Energy Act, the regulations under it or the terms of the licenses of nuclear generation facilities. Unless extended, as to which no assurance can be given, the NRC operating licenses for the two licensed operating units at the Comanche Peak Facility will expire in 2030 and 2033, respectively. Changes in regulations by the NRC, as well as any extension of our operating licenses, could require a substantial increase in capital expenditures or result in increased operating or decommissioning costs.
37

Nuclear Accident Risk — Although the safety record of the Comanche Peak Facility and other nuclear generation facilities generally has been very good, accidents and other unforeseen problems have occurred both in the U.S. and elsewhere. The consequences of an accident can be severe and include loss of life, injury, lasting negative health impacts and property damage. Any accident, or perceived accident, could result in significant liabilities and damage our reputation. Any such resulting liability from a nuclear accident could exceed our resources, including insurance coverage, and could ultimately result in the suspension or termination of power generation from the Comanche Peak Facility.

40

The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations are capital intensive and involve significant risks that could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

The operation and maintenance of power generation facilities and related mining operations involve many risks, including, as applicable, start-up risks, breakdown or failure of facilities, equipment or processes, operator error, lack of sufficient capital to maintain the facilities, the dependence on a specific fuel source, the ability to timely obtain parts for equipment repairs, the inability to transport our product to our customers in an efficient manner due to the lack of transmission capacity or the impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions or other natural events, or terrorist attacks, as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of output, efficiency or reliability, the occurrence of any of which could result in substantial lost revenues and/or increased expenses. A significant number of our facilities were constructed many years ago. Older generatinggeneration equipment, even if maintained or refurbished in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to operate at peak efficiency or reliability. The risk of increased maintenance and capital expenditures arises from (a) increased starting and stopping of generation equipment due to the volatility of the competitive generation market and the prospect of continuing low wholesale electricity prices that may not justify sustained or year-round operation of all our generation facilities, (b) any unexpected failure to generate power, including failure caused by equipment breakdown or unplanned outage (whether by order of applicable governmental regulatory authorities, the impact of weather events or natural disasters or otherwise), (c) damage to facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, terrorist or cyber/data security actscybersecurity attacks, including nation-state attacks or organized cybercrime and other catastrophic events and (d) the passage of time and normal wear and tear. Further, our ability to successfully and timely complete routine maintenance or other capital projects at our existing facilities is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful, we could be subject to additional costs or losses and write downs of our investment in the project.

We cannot be certain of the level of capital expenditures that will be required due to changing environmental and safety laws and regulations (including changes in the interpretation or enforcement thereof), needed facility repairs and unexpected events (such as natural disasters or terrorist or cyber/data security attacks).repairs. The unexpected requirement of large capital expenditures could have a material adverse effect on us. Moreover, if we significantly modify a unit, we may be required to install the best available control technology or to achieve the lowest achievable emission rates as such terms are defined under the new source review provisions of the CAA, which would likely result in substantial additional capital expenditures.

In addition, unplanned outages at any of our generation facilities, whether because of equipment breakdown or otherwise, typically increase our operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of selling fewer MWh or non-performance penalties or require us to incur significant costs as a result of running one of our higher cost units or to procure replacement power at spot market prices in order to fulfill contractual commitments. If we do not have adequate liquidity to meet margin and collateral requirements, we may be exposed to significant losses, may miss significant opportunities and may have increased exposure to the volatility of spot markets, which could have a material adverse effect on us. Further, our inability to operate our generation facilities efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs, and generate earnings and cash flows from our asset-based businesses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. While we maintain insurance, obtain warranties from vendors and obligate contractors to meet certain performance levels, the proceeds of such insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not be adequate to cover our lost revenues, increased expenses or liquidated damages payments should we experience equipment breakdown or non-performance by contractors or vendors.

38

Operation of power generation facilities involves significant risks and hazards customary to the power industry that could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations, and we may not have adequate insurance to cover these risks and hazards. Our employees, contractors, customers and the general public may be exposed to a risk of injury due to the nature of our operations.

Power generation involves hazardous activities, including acquiring, transporting and unloading fuel, operating large pieces of equipment and delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. In addition to natural risks such as extreme weather, earthquake, flood, lightning, hurricane and wind, other human-made hazards, such as nuclear accidents, dam failure, gas or other explosions, mine area collapses, fire, structural collapse, machinery failure and other dangerous incidents are inherent risks in our operations. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property, plant and equipment, contamination of, or damage to, the environment and suspension of operations. Further, our employees and contractors work in, and customers and the general public may be exposed to, potentially dangerous environments at or near our operations. As a result, employees, contractors, customers and the general public are at risk for serious injury, including loss of life.

41

The occurrence of any one of these events may result in us being named as a defendant in lawsuits asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties. We maintain an amount of insurance protection that we consider adequate, but we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject and, even if we do have insurance coverage for a particular circumstance, we may be subject to a large deductible and maximum cap. A successful claim for which we are not fully insured could hurt our financial results and materially harm our financial condition. Further, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, including increasing pressure on firms that provide insurance to companies that own and operate fossil fuel generation, we cannot provide any assurance that our insurance coverage will continue to be available at all or at rates or on terms similar to those presently available. Any losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We have been and may in the future be materially and adversely affected by obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, corrective action, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR.

As a result of electricity produced for decades at coal-fueled power plants in Illinois, Texas and Ohio, we manage large amounts of CCR material in surface impoundments, all in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.impoundments. In addition to the federal requirements under the CCR rule, CCR surface impoundments will continue to be regulated by existing state laws, regulations and permits, as well as additional legal requirements that may be imposed in the future. These federal and state laws, regulations and other legal requirements may require or result in additional expenditures, increased operating and maintenance costs and/or result in closure of certain power generatinggeneration facilities, which could affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Company. We have recognized ARO related to these CCR-related requirements. As the closure and CCR management work progresses and final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved at each site, the scope and complexity of work and the amount of CCR material could be greater than current estimates and could, therefore, materially impact earnings through increased compliance expenditures.

The EPA is reviewing applications submitted by us to extend closure deadlines for many of our CCR impoundments. The EPA has been directed by the Biden Administration to review a number of environmental rules adopted by the EPA during the Trump Administration, including Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)the CCR rule, the Emissions Limitation Guidelines (ELG)ELG rule, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE)ACE rule and the PMparticulate matter (PM) and Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)NAAQS rules. All of these rules may significantly and adversely impact our existing coal fleet and may lead to accelerated plant closure timeframes. In addition, the new GHG rule expected revisions to be finalized this year and the ACEPM2.5 NAAQS rule andreleased this year along with other NAAQS alsothat may be issued in the future have the potential to adversely impact our natural gas-fired units.

The EPA is reviewing applications submitted by us to extend closure deadlines for many of our CCR impoundments. The scope and cost of that closure work could increase significantly based on new or potential requirements imposed by the EPA or state agencies.agencies, including the EPA's interpretations on requirements for closure of CCR units. There is no assurance that our current assumptions for closure activities will be accepted by EPA.the EPA or state agencies. If ponds must be closed sooner than anticipated, plant closures timeframes may be accelerated.

39

The availability and cost of emission allowances could adversely impact our costs of operations.

We are required to maintain, through either allocations or purchases, sufficient emission allowances for SO2, CO2 and NOX to support our operations in the ordinary course of operating our power generation facilities. These allowances are used to meet the obligations imposed on us by various applicable environmental laws. If our operational needs require more than our allocated allowances, we may be forced to purchase such allowances on the open market, which could be costly. If we are unable to maintain sufficient emission allowances to match our operational needs, we may have to curtail our operations so as not to exceed our available emission allowances or install costly new emission controls. As we use the emission allowances that we have purchased on the open market, costs associated with such purchases will be recognized as operating expense. If such allowances are available for purchase, but only at significantly higher prices, the purchase of such allowances could materially increase our costs of operations in the affected markets.

42

We have been and may in the future be materially and adversely affected by the effects of extreme weather conditions and seasonality.

We have been and may in the future be materially affected by weather conditions and our businesses may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal basis as the weather changes. In addition, we are subject to the effects of extreme weather conditions, including sustained or extreme cold or hot temperatures, hurricanes, floods, droughts, storms, fires, earthquakes or other natural disasters, which could stress our generation facilities and grid reliability, limit our ability to procure adequate fuel supply, or result in outages, damage or destroy our assets and result in casualty losses that are not ultimately offset by insurance proceeds, and could require increased capital expenditures or maintenance costs, including supply chain costs.

Moreover, an extreme weather event could cause disruption in service to customers due to downed wires and poles or damage to other operating equipment, which could result in us foregoing sales of electricity and lost revenue. Similarly, certain extreme weather events have previously affected, and may in the future, affect, the availability of generation and transmission capacity, limiting our ability to source or deliver power where it is needed or limit our ability to source fuel for our plants, including due to damage to rail or natural gas pipeline infrastructure. Additionally, extreme weather has resulted, and may in the future result, in (i) unexpected increases in customer load, requiring our retail operation to procure additional electricity supplies at wholesale prices in excess of customer sales prices for electricity, (ii) the failure of equipment at our generation facilities, (iii) a decrease in the availability of, or increases in the cost of, fuel sources, including natural gas, diesel and coal, or (iv) unpredictable curtailment of customer load by the applicable ISO/RTO in order to maintain grid reliability, resulting in the realization of lower wholesale prices or retail customer sales. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and AnalysisFor example, Winter Storm Uri in February 2021 had a material impact on our results of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.operations.

Additionally, climate change may produce changes in weather or other environmental conditions, including temperature or precipitation levels, and thus may impact consumer demand for electricity. In addition, the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, and other climatic events, could disrupt our operations and cause us to incur significant costs to prepare for or respond to these effects.

Weather conditions, which cannot be reliably predicted, could have adverse consequences by requiring us to seek additional sources of electricity when wholesale market prices are high or to sell excess electricity when market prices are low, as well as significantly limiting the supply of, or increasing the cost of our fuel supply, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

TheEvents outside of our control, including an epidemic or outbreak of COVID-19, or the future outbreak of any other highlyan infectious or contagious diseases, could have a material and adverse effect ondisease may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.business.

We face risks related to epidemics, outbreaks or other public health events that are outside of our control, and could significantly disrupt our operations and adversely affect our financial condition. The global or national outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted economic activity and conditions worldwide, and we are responding to the outbreak by taking steps to mitigate the potential risks to us posed by its spread. We continue to examine the impacts of the pandemic on our workforce, liquidity, reliability, cybersecurity, customers, suppliers, along withan illness or other macroeconomic conditions and cannot currently predict whether COVID-19 will have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

Because we are deemed a critical infrastructure provider that provides a critical servicecommunicable disease, or any other public health crisis may cause disruptions to our customers, we must keep our employees who operate our businesses safebusiness and minimize unnecessary risk of exposure. We have updated and implemented our company-wide pandemic plan to address specific aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic. This plan guides our emergency response, business continuity, and the precautionary measures we are taking on behalf of employees and the public. We will continue to monitor developments affecting both our workforce and our customers, and we will take additional precautions that we determine are necessary in order to mitigate the impacts. In particular, we have taken extra precautions for our employees who work in the field and for employees who continue to work in our facilities including requiring, for both employees and contractors, social distancing where possible and requiring the use of appropriate personal protective equipment in certain circumstances. We have implemented work-from-home policies and other safety measures where appropriate, including, but not limited to, temperature testing at all of our locations for employees, contractors, and other essential visitors and closing our facilities to non-essential visitors. While our systems and operations remain vulnerable to cyber-attacks and other disruptions due in part to the fact that a portion of our workforce continues to work remotely, we have implemented physical and cyber-security measures to ensure that our systems remain functional in order to both serve our operational needs with a remote workforce and keep them running to ensure uninterrupted service to our customers. We will continue to review and modify our plans, as conditions change.

43

Measures to control the spreada number of COVID-19,factors, including restrictions on travel, public gatherings, and certain business operations, have affected the demand for the products and services of many businesses in the areas in which we operate and disrupted supply chains around the world. The full scope and extent of the impacts of COVID-19 on our operations are unknown at this time. However, COVID-19 or another pandemic could have material and adverse effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows due to, among other factors,(a) a protracted slowdown of broad sectors of the economy, (b) changes in demand or supply for commodities, (c) significant changes in legislation or regulatory policy to address the pandemic (including prohibitions on certain marketing channels, moratoriums or conditions oron disconnections andor limits or restrictions oron late fees), (d) reduced demand for electricity (particularly from commercial and industrial customers), (e) increased late or uncollectible customer payments, (f) negative impacts on the health of our workforce, (g) a deterioration of our ability to ensure business continuity (including increased risk from cybersecurity attacksvulnerability to cyber and other information technology risks as a result of a significant portion of our workforce continuing to work from home), and (h) the inability of the Company's contractors, suppliers, and other business partners to fulfill their contractual obligations.

40


Changes in technology, increased electricity conservation efforts, or energy sustainability efforts may reduce the value of our generation facilitiesbusiness, introduce new or emerging risks, and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on us.

If we cannot adopt technological developments on a timely basis, demand for our services may decline, or we may face challenges in implementing or evolving our business strategy. Significant technological changes continue to impact our industry. To grow and remain competitive, we will need to adapt to changes in available technology like generative AI, continually invest in our assets, increase generation capacity, increase our use of renewable technologies, enhance our existing offerings, and introduce new offerings to meet our current and potential customers’ changing service demands. Competitors may incorporate AI into their businesses, services, and products more quickly or more successfully than we do. Adopting new and sophisticated technologies may result in implementation issues, such as scheduling and supplier delays, unexpected or increased costs, technological constraints, regulatory issues, customer dissatisfaction, and other issues that could cause delays in launching new technological capabilities, which in turn could result in significant costs or reduce the anticipated benefits of the upgrades. As we adopt new technologies, like AI, there is a risk that the content, analyses, recommendations, or judgments that AI applications assist in producing are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, biased, or infringe on other’s rights or property interests. Our new services could fail to retain or gain acceptance in the marketplace, or costs associated with these services could be higher than anticipated. As such, our adoption of technology or failure to adopt technology could have a material adverse effect on our business, brand, financial condition, business strategy, and operating results.

Technological advances have improved, and are likely to continue to improve, for existing and alternative methods to produce and store power, including natural gas turbines, wind turbines, fuel cells, hydrogen, micro turbines, photovoltaic (solar) cells, batteries and concentrated solar thermal devices, along with improvements in traditional technologies. Such technological advances may be superior to, or may not be compatible with, some of our existing technologies, investments and infrastructure, and may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive, and have resulted, and are expected to continue to reduce the costs of power production or storage, which may result in the obsolescence of certain of our operating assets. Consequently, the value of our more traditional generation assets could be significantly reduced as a result of these competitive advances, which could have a material adverse effect on us and our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services and products that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards. In addition, changes in technology have altered, and are expected to continue to alter, the channels through which retail customers buy electricity (i.e., self-generation or distributed-generation facilities). To the extent self-generation or distributed generation facilities become a more cost-effective option for customers, our financial condition, operating cash flows and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Technological advances in demand-side management and increased conservation efforts have resulted, and are expected to continue to result, in a decrease in electricity demand. A significant decrease in electricity demand as a result of such efforts would significantly reduce the value of our generation assets. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce power consumption. Effective power conservation by our customers could result in reduced electricity demand or significantly slow the growth in such demand. Any such reduction in demand could have a material adverse effect on us. Furthermore, we may incur increased capital expenditures if we are required to increase investment in conservation measures. Additionally, increased governmental and consumer focus on energy sustainability efforts, including desire for, or incentives related to, the development, implementation and usage of low-carbon technology, may result in decreased demand for the traditional generation technologies that we currently own and operate.

We may potentially be affected by emerging technologies that may over time affect change in capacity markets and the energy industry overall with the inclusion ofincluding distributed generation and clean technology.

Some of these emerging technologies are shale gas production, distributed renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency, broad consumer adoption of electric vehicles, distributed generation and energy storage devices. Additionally, large-scale cryptocurrency mining is becoming increasingly prevalent in certain markets, including ERCOT, and many of these cryptocurrency mining facilities are "behind-the-meter." Such emerging technologies could affect the price of energy, levels of customer-owned generation, customer expectations and current business models and make portions of our electric system power supply and transmission and/or distribution facilities obsolete prior to the end of their useful lives. These emerging technologies may also affect the financial viability of utility counterparties and could have significant impacts on wholesale market prices, which could ultimately have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

4441

The loss of the services of our key"key" management and personnel could adversely affect our ability to successfully operate our businesses.

Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. We compete for such personnel with many other companies, in and outside of our industry, government entities and other organizations. We may not be successfulPotential difficulties in attracting and retaining current personnel or in hiring or retaining qualified personnel in the future. Our failure to attract highly qualified, new personnel or retain highly qualified existing personnelskilled employees could have an adverse effect onrestrict our ability to successfully operateadequately support our businesses.business needs and/or result in increased personnel costs. In addition, effective succession planning is important to our long-term success. Failure to timely and effectively ensure transfer of knowledge and smooth transitions involving senior management and other key personnel could hinder our strategic planning and execution.

We could be materially and adversely impacted by strikes or work stoppages by our unionized employees.

As of December 31, 2020,2023, we had approximately 1,6401,200 employees covered by collective bargaining agreements. The terms of all current collective bargaining agreements covering represented personnel engaged in lignite mining operations, lignite-, coal-, natural gas- and nuclear-fueled generation operation, andas well as some of our natural gas-fueled generationbattery operations, expire on various dates between May 2021March 2024 and November 2023,March 2028, but remain effective thereafter unless and until terminated by either party. We are also presently negotiating the terms of first contracts at two of our natural gas-fueled generation facilities. In the event that our union employees strike, participate in a work stoppage or slowdown or engage in other forms of labor strife or disruption, we would be responsible for procuring replacement labor or we could experience reduced power generation or outages. Our ability to procure such labor is uncertain.We have in place strike contingency plans that address the procurement of replacement labor. Strikes, work stoppages or the inability to negotiate current or future collective bargaining agreements on favorable terms or at all could have a material adverse effect on us.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Ownership of our Common Stock

Vistra is a holding company and its ability to obtain funds from its subsidiaries is structurally subordinated to existing and future liabilities of its subsidiaries.

Vistra is a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of its own. As a result, Vistra's cash flows and ability to meet its obligations are largely dependent upon the operating cash flows of Vistra's subsidiaries and the payment of such operating cash flows to Vistra in the form of dividends, distributions, loans or otherwise. These subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities from Vistra and have no obligation (other than any existing contractual obligations) to provide Vistra with funds to satisfy its obligations. Any decision by a subsidiary to provide Vistra with funds to satisfy its obligations, including those under the TRA, whether by dividends, distributions, loans or otherwise, will depend on, among other things, such subsidiary's results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, cash requirements, contractual prohibitions and other restrictions, applicable law and other factors. The deterioration of income from, or other available assets of, any such subsidiary for any reason could limit or impair its ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to Vistra.

Investor focusEvolving expectations from stakeholders, including investors, on environmental, social, and governanceESG issues, including climate change and sustainability matters, and erosion of stakeholder trust or confidence could influence actions or decisions about our company and our industry and could adversely affect our business, operations, financial results or stock price.

Investor focus on environmental, social, and governance issues, includingCompanies across all industries are facing evolving expectations or increasing attention onscrutiny from stakeholders related to their approach to ESG matters. For Vistra, climate change, safety and sustainability matters, could adversely affect,stakeholder relations remain primary focus areas, and increase the potential volatilitychanging expectations of our stock price.practices and performance across these and other ESG areas may impose additional costs or create exposure to new or additional risks. Our operations, projects and growth opportunities require us to have strong relationships with key stakeholders, including local communities and other groups directly impacted by our activities, as well as governments and government agencies, investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds and others which are increasingly focused on ESG practices. Certain financial institutions have announced policies to presently or in the future cease investing or to divest investments in companies that derive any or a specified portion of their income from, or have any or a specified portion of their operations in, coal and/or other fossil fuels. To date these represent small fractions

42

While we are strategically focused on successfully adapting to the energy transition and strongly committed to our overall current or potential equity investors, but that group could growESG practices and thus reduce demand forperformance (including transparency and accountability thereof), our common stock or otherwise increase volatility in our stock price. The Company’s planplans to transition to clean power generation sources and reduce itsour carbon footprint may not be completed in the timeframe orand we may not achieve theour targets as expected. Negative investorexpected, which could impact stakeholder trust and confidence. Any such erosion of stakeholder trust and confidence, evolving expectations from stakeholders on such ESG issues, and such parties' resulting actions or decisions about our company and our industry could have negative impacts on our business, operations, financial results, and stock price, including:

negative stakeholder sentiment toward us and our industry, including concerns over environmental or sustainability matters and potential changes in federal and state regulatory actions related thereto — couldthereto;
loss of business or loss of market share, including to competitors who do not have any, or comparable amounts, of operations involving fossil fuels;
loss of ability to secure growth opportunities;
the inability to, or increased difficulties and costs of, obtaining services, materials, or insurance from third parties;
reductions in our credit ratings or increased costs of, or limited access to, capital;
delays in project execution;
legal action;
inability or limitations on ability to receive applicable government subsidies, or competitors with smaller or no fossil operations receiving subsidies for which we are not eligible, or in larger amounts;
increased regulatory oversight;
loss of ability to obtain and maintain necessary approvals and permits from governments and regulatory agencies on a negative impacttimely basis and on acceptable terms;
impediments on our stock priceability to acquire or renew rights-of-way or land rights on a timely basis and on acceptable terms;
.changing investor sentiment regarding investment in the power and utilities industry or our company;
restricted access to and cost of capital; and
loss of ability to hire and retain top talent.

45

We may not pay any dividends on our common stock in the future.future, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our share repurchase program.

In November 2018, we announced that theThe Board hadhas adopted a dividend program which we initiated in the first quarter of 2019. Each dividend under the program will be subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, contractual prohibitions and other restrictions with respect to the payment of dividends. There is no assurance that the Board will declare, or that we will pay, any dividends on our common stock in the future.

The Board has approved a share repurchase program in an aggregate authorized amount of $5.75 billion. Under this share repurchase program or any other future share repurchase programs, we may make share repurchases through a variety of methods, including open share market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of repurchases, if any, will depend on factors such as the stock price, economic and market conditions, and corporate and regulatory requirements. Any failure to repurchase shares after we have announced our intention to do so may negatively impact our reputation, investor confidence and the price of our common stock.

Holders of our preferred stock may have interests and rights that are different from our common stockholders.

We are permitted under our certificate of incorporation to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. We can issue shares of our preferred stock in one or more series and can set the terms of the preferred stock without seeking any further approval from our common stockholders. Any preferred stock that we issue may rank ahead of our common stock in terms of dividend priority or liquidation premiums and may have greater voting rights than our common stock, which could dilute the value of our common stock to current stockholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As of December 31, 2023, 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 1,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, and 476,081 shares of Series C Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding. The Preferred Stock represents a perpetual equity interest in the Company and, unlike our indebtedness, will not give rise to a claim for payment of a principal amount at a particular date; provided, the Company may redeem the Preferred Stock at the specified times (or upon certain specified events) at the applicable redemption price set forth in the certificate of designation of each of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and Series C Preferred Stock, respectively (Certificates of Designation). The Preferred Stock is not convertible into or exchangeable for any other securities of the Company. Upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of the Company, the holders of Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, pro rata and in preference to the holders of any other capital stock, an
43

amount per share equal to $1,000 plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, if any.

Unless we have received the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock and the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock, each voting as a separate class, we may not adopt any amendment to our certificate of incorporation (including the applicable Certificates of Designation) that would have a material adverse effect on the powers, preferences, duties, or special rights of such series of Preferred Stock, subject to certain exceptions. In addition, unless we have received the affirmative vote or consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock and the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock, voting as a class together with the holders of any parity securities upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable, we may not: (i) create or issue any senior securities, (ii) create or issue any parity securities (including any additional Preferred Stock) if the cumulative dividends payable on the outstanding Preferred Stock (or parity securities, if applicable) are in arrears; (iii) create or issue any additional Preferred Stock or any parity securities with an aggregate liquidation preference, together with the issued and outstanding Preferred Stock and any parity securities that are then outstanding, of greater than $2.5 billion, and (iv) engage in any Transaction that results in a Covered Disposition (as such terms are defined in the Certificates of Designation).

In addition, holders of the Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by our Board, semi-annual cash dividends on the Preferred Stock, which are cumulative from the applicable initial issuance date of the Preferred Stock and payable in arrears, and unless full cumulative dividends have been or contemporaneously are being paid or declared on the Preferred Stock, we may not (i) declare or pay any dividends on any junior securities, including our common stock, or (ii) redeem or repurchase any parity securities or junior securities, subject to limited exceptions set forth in the Certificates of Designation. There is no assurance that the Board will declare, or that we will pay, any dividends on our Preferred Stock in the future. The holders of Preferred Stock (along with any parity securities then outstanding with similar rights) are entitled to elect two additional directors in the event any dividends on Preferred Stock are in arrears for three or more semi-annual dividend periods (whether or not consecutive), and such directors may have competing and different interests to those elected by our common stockholders. The dividend rate for the Series A Preferred Stock from and including the initial issuance date of October 15, 2021 until the first reset date of October 15, 2026 will be 8.0% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series A Preferred Stock. The dividend rate for the Series B Preferred Stock from and including the initial issuance date of December 10, 2021 until the first reset date of December 15, 2026 will be 7.0% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series B Preferred Stock. The dividend rate for the Series C Preferred Stock from and including the initial issuance date of December 29, 2023 until the first reset date of January 15, 2029 will be 8.875% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share of Series C Preferred Stock. On and after the first reset date of the Series A Preferred Stock, the dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Stock for each subsequent five-year period (each, a Reset Period) will be adjusted based upon the applicable Treasury rate, plus a spread of 6.93% per annum; provided that the applicable Treasury rate for each Reset Period will not be lower than 1.07%. On and after the first reset date of the Series B Preferred Stock, the dividend rate on the Series B Preferred Stock for each Reset Period will be adjusted based upon the applicable Treasury rate, plus a spread of 5.74% per annum; provided that the applicable Treasury rate for each Reset Period will not be lower than 1.26%. On and after the first reset date of the Series C Preferred Stock, the dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock for each Reset Period will be adjusted based upon the applicable Treasury rate, plus a spread of 5.045% per annum; provided that the applicable Treasury rate for each Reset Period will not be lower than 3.830%. In the event that the Company does not exercise its option to redeem all the shares of Preferred Stock within 120 days after the first date on which a Change of Control Trigger Event (as defined in the Certificate of Designation) occurs, the then-applicable dividend rate for the Preferred Stock will be increased by 5.00%.

Item 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

44


Item 1C.CYBERSECURITY

The Company has a cybersecurity and incident response program designed to assess, identify, and manage material risks from cybersecurity threats, including matters related to the cybersecurity of the Company's critical infrastructure, data, or information technology systems and the Company's actions to prepare for, identify, assess, respond, mitigate and remediate material cyber, information security, or technology risks (collectively referred to as Information Security). This program includes:

operating a Cyber Security Operations Center;
raising employee awareness through annual general and job-specific cybersecurity trainings and employee phishing simulations;
maintaining defined cyber incident response plans;
enhancing security measures to protect our systems and data;
evolving monitoring capabilities to improve early detection and rapid response to potential cyber threats; and
adapting to new work environments that include off-site work through mitigation of remote network risk to our internal systems, assets, or data.

Cybersecurity represents an important component of the Company's overall approach to enterprise risk management and is integrated into the risk management process and ongoing assessment. In addition to an internal security program, we strive to stay ahead of the threat landscape by working to conduct due diligence on key third-party vendors' Information Security programs and risks. We make strategic investments in our perimeter and internal defenses, cyber security operations center, and regulatory compliance activities with the advice of consultants and third parties. Moreover, to minimize risk, we maintain an insurance policy that provides coverage for matters relating to Information Security.

Vistra's Chief Information Officer (CIO) ensures Information Security is built into the Company's larger technology strategy and oversees our Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). Our CISO and his Information Security team are responsible for leading the enterprise-wide information security strategy, policy, standards, architecture, and processes and our Cyber Incident Response Teams under the CISO are responsible for monitoring and analyzing the Company's cybersecurity posture in partnership with Risk and Legal.

The CIO and CISO collaborate with our internal audit department and external consultants to review information technology-related risks (based upon the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework) as part of the overall Vistra cyber risk management process. Through these processes, the CIO and CISO are informed about and monitor the prevention, detection, mitigation and remediation of cybersecurity threats.

We also participate in industry groups and with regulators to gain additional knowledge, including, but not limited to, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center, U.S. Cyber Emergency Response Team, the NRC and NERC. We apply the knowledge gained through industry partnerships, government organizations, external cyber risk platforms, and program maturity assessments to improve our processes to detect and mitigate cyber threats.

As of the date of this report, we have not identified any impacts from cybersecurity threats, including those from any previous cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected our results of operation or financial condition. However, despite our efforts, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced undetected cybersecurity incidents. For additional information on risks from cybersecurity threats, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.

While the Board has established a separate Risk and Sustainability Committee to oversee enterprise risk processes, the Board maintains oversight of Vistra's Information Security. Vistra engaged a third-party advisor to provide cybersecurity oversight and tabletop training to the full Board in 2023 to further our commitment to responsible oversight of cybersecurity risk management. At least quarterly, our CIO reports to the Board on our Information Security program, including cybersecurity risks and threats (including the emerging threat landscape), an assessment of our Information Security program, and the status of projects to strengthen our Information Security program. In furtherance of our commitment to responsible oversight of cybersecurity risk management, in 2023, the Board appointed a director who brings extensive cybersecurity expertise to the Board.

45

Our CIO serves as head of Vistra's Technology Services and is responsible for ensuring the reliability, security, and continued development of the Company's technology platforms and delivering new solutions to support the business. The CIO has served in various senior information technology roles in public companies for over 30 years, including Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., General Motors, Pfizer, and Electronic Data Systems.

Our CISO also has over 35 years of information technology experience. He is a 10-year U.S. Air Force veteran and has held technology positions in infrastructure management and operations with Raytheon and Blockbuster. He also maintains Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) and Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) certifications.

Item 2.PROPERTIES

Luminant'sThe following table presents our asset fleet consistsas of power generation and battery ESS units in six ISOs/RTOs, with the location, ISO/RTO, technology, primary fuel type, net capacity and ownership interest for each generation facility shown in the table below:December 31, 2023 by segment. All of our facilities are 100% (fee simple) owned.
FacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary Fuel (a)Net Capacity (MW) (b)Ownership Interest (c)
EnnisEnnis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas366 100%
ForneyForney, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,912 100%
HaysSan Marcos, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,047 100%
LamarParis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,076 100%
MidlothianMidlothian, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,596 100%
OdessaOdessa, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,054 100%
WisePoolville, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas787 100%
Martin LakeTatum, TXERCOTSTCoal2,250 100%
Oak GroveFranklin, TXERCOTSTCoal1,600 100%
DeCordovaGranbury, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas260 100%
GrahamGraham, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas630 100%
Lake HubbardDallas, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas921 100%
Morgan CreekColorado City, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas390 100%
Permian BasinMonahans, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas325 100%
Stryker CreekRusk, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas685 100%
TrinidadTrinidad, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas244 100%
Comanche PeakGlen Rose, TXERCOTNuclearNuclear2,300 100%
Upton 2Upton County, TXERCOTSolar/BatteryRenewable180 100%
Total Texas Segment17,623 
FayetteMasontown, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas726 100%
Hanging RockIronton, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,430 100%
HopewellHopewell, VAPJMCCGTNatural Gas370 100%
KendallMinooka, ILPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,288 100%
LibertyEddystone, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas607 100%
OntelauneeReading, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas600 100%
SayrevilleSayreville, NJPJMCCGTNatural Gas349 100%
WashingtonBeverly, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas711 100%
CalumetChicago, ILPJMCTNatural Gas380 100%
Dicks CreekMonroe, OHPJMCTNatural Gas155 100%
Miami Fort (CT)North Bend, OHPJMCTFuel Oil77 100%
PleasantsSaint Marys, WVPJMCTNatural Gas388 100%
RichlandDefiance, OHPJMCTNatural Gas423 100%
FacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNet Capacity (MW) (a)
Texas Segment
EnnisEnnis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas366 
ForneyForney, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,912 
HaysSan Marcos, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,047 
LamarParis, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,076 
MidlothianMidlothian, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,596 
OdessaOdessa, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas1,054 
WisePoolville, TXERCOTCCGTNatural Gas787 
Martin LakeTatum, TXERCOTSTCoal2,250 
Oak GroveFranklin, TXERCOTSTCoal1,600 
DeCordovaGranbury, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas260 
GrahamGraham, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas630 
Lake HubbardDallas, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas921 
Morgan CreekColorado City, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas390 
Permian BasinMonahans, TXERCOTCTNatural Gas325 
Stryker CreekRusk, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas685 
TrinidadTrinidad, TXERCOTSTNatural Gas244 
Comanche Peak (b)Glen Rose, TXERCOTNuclearNuclear2,400 
BrightsideLive Oak County, TXERCOTSolarRenewable50 
Emerald GroveCrane County, TXERCOTSolarRenewable108 
Upton 2Upton County, TXERCOTSolar/BatteryRenewable190 
DeCordovaGranbury, TXERCOTBatteryRenewable260 
Total Texas Segment18,151
46

FacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary Fuel (a)Net Capacity (MW) (b)Ownership Interest (c)
StrykerStryker, OHPJMCTFuel Oil16 100%
BellinghamBellingham, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas566 100%
BlackstoneBlackstone, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas544 100%
Casco BayVeazie, MEISO-NECCGTNatural Gas543 100%
Lake RoadDayville, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas827 100%
MasspowerIndian Orchard, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas281 100%
MilfordMilford, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas600 100%
IndependenceOswego, NYNYISOCCGTNatural Gas1,212 100%
Total East Segment12,093 
Moss Landing 1 & 2Moss Landing, CACAISOCCGTNatural Gas1,020 100%
Moss LandingMoss Landing, CACAISOBatteryRenewable300 100%
OaklandOakland, CACAISOCTFuel Oil165 100%
Total West Segment1,485 
Coleto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTSTCoal650 100%
BaldwinBaldwin, ILMISOSTCoal1,185 100%
EdwardsBartonville, ILMISOSTCoal585 100%
NewtonNewton, ILMISOSTCoal615 100%
Joppa/EEIJoppa, ILMISOSTCoal802 80%
Joppa CT 1-3Joppa, ILMISOCTNatural Gas165 100%
Joppa CT 4-5Joppa, ILMISOCTNatural Gas56 80%
KincaidKincaid, ILPJMSTCoal1,108 100%
Miami Fort 7 & 8North Bend, OHPJMSTCoal1,020 100%
ZimmerMoscow, OHPJMSTCoal1,300 100%
Total Sunset Segment7,486 
Total capacity38,687 
FacilityLocationISO/RTOTechnologyPrimary FuelNet Capacity (MW) (a)
East Segment
FayetteMasontown, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas726 
Hanging RockIronton, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,430 
HopewellHopewell, VAPJMCCGTNatural Gas370 
KendallMinooka, ILPJMCCGTNatural Gas1,288 
LibertyEddystone, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas607 
OntelauneeReading, PAPJMCCGTNatural Gas600 
SayrevilleSayreville, NJPJMCCGTNatural Gas349 
WashingtonBeverly, OHPJMCCGTNatural Gas711 
CalumetChicago, ILPJMCTNatural Gas380 
Dicks CreekMonroe, OHPJMCTNatural Gas155 
Miami Fort (CT)North Bend, OHPJMCTFuel Oil77 
PleasantsSaint Marys, WVPJMCTNatural Gas388 
Richland (c)Defiance, OHPJMCTNatural Gas423 
Stryker (c)Stryker, OHPJMCTFuel Oil16 
BellinghamBellingham, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas566 
BlackstoneBlackstone, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas544 
Casco BayVeazie, MEISO-NECCGTNatural Gas543 
Lake RoadDayville, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas827 
MasspowerIndian Orchard, MAISO-NECCGTNatural Gas281 
MilfordMilford, CTISO-NECCGTNatural Gas600 
IndependenceOswego, NYNYISOCCGTNatural Gas1,212 
Total East Segment12,093
West Segment
Moss Landing 1 & 2Moss Landing, CACAISOCCGTNatural Gas1,020 
Moss LandingMoss Landing, CACAISOBatteryRenewable750 
OaklandOakland, CACAISOCTFuel Oil110 
Total West Segment1,880
Sunset Segment
Coleto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTSTCoal650 
BaldwinBaldwin, ILMISOSTCoal1,185 
NewtonNewton, ILMISOSTCoal615 
KincaidKincaid, ILPJMSTCoal1,108 
Miami Fort 7 & 8North Bend, OHPJMSTCoal1,020 
Total Sunset Segment4,578
Total capacity36,702
___________
(a)Renewable representsApproximate net generation assets fueled by renewable sources including energy storage and solar, which do not have significant fuel costs.
(b)Unit capabilities arecapacity. Actual net generation capacity may vary based on winter capacity and are reflected at our net ownership interest.a number of factors, including ambient temperature. We have not included units that have been retired or are out of operation.
(b)In October 2022, we announced the submission of our application to the NRC for license renewal at our two-unit Comanche Peak Nuclear Plant. The current licenses for Units 1 and 2 extend into 2030 and 2033, respectively, and we are applying to renew the licenses into 2050 and 2053, respectively.
(c)Ownership interest of 100% indicates fee simple ownership ofWe have entered into an agreement to sell the facility. Ownership of less than 100% indicates the share of ownershipRichland and Stryker generation facilities, and closing is expected in the facility held by the Company.early March 2024.

47

See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our solar and battery energy storage projects currently under development.development and Note 4 to the Financial Statements for discussion of our retirement of certain generation facilities, including the Zimmer, Joppa and Edwards generation facilities that we retired in June 2022, September 2022 and January 2023, respectively, that are reported in our Asset Closure segment and excluded from the table above.

Our wholesale commodity risk management group also procures renewable energy credits from renewable generation in ERCOT to support our electricity sales to wholesale and retail customers to satisfy the increasing demand for renewable resources from such customers. As of December 31, 2020,2023, Vistra had long-term power purchase agreements to procure renewable energy credits from approximately 1,015885 MW of available renewable capacity.generation. These renewable generation sources deliver electricity when conditions make them available, and, when on-line, they generally compete with baseload units. Because they cannot be relied upon to meet demand continuously due to their dependence on weather and time of day, these generation sources are categorized as non-dispatchable and create the need for intermediate/load-following resources to respond to changes in their output.

47

Fuel Supply

Nuclear We own and operate two nuclear generation units at the Comanche Peak plant site in ERCOT, each of which is designed for a capacity of 1,150 MW. Comanche Peak Unit 1 and Unit 2 went into commercial operation in 1990 and 1993, respectively, and are generally operated at full capacity. Refueling (nuclear fuel assembly replacement) outages for each unit are scheduled to occur every eighteen months during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. Every three years, the refueling cycle results in the refueling of both units during the same year, which occurred in 2020. While one unit is undergoing a refueling outage, the remaining unit is intended to operate at full capacity. During a refueling outage, other maintenance, modification and testing activities are completed that cannot be accomplished when the unit is in operation. The Comanche Peak facility operated at a capacity factor of 97%, 96% and 101% in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

We have contracts in place for all of our 2021 and the majority of our 2022 nuclear fuel requirements. We do not anticipate any significant difficulties in acquiring uranium and contracting for associated conversion, enrichment and fabrication services in the foreseeable future.

Natural Gas Our natural gas-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 23 CCGT generating facilities totaling 19,512 MW and 13 peaking generation facilities totaling 5,022 MW. We satisfy our fuel requirements at these facilities through a combination of spot market and near-term purchase contracts. Additionally, we have near-term natural gas transportation agreements in place to ensure reliable fuel supply.

Coal/Lignite Our coal/lignite-fueled generation fleet is comprised of 10 generation facilities totaling 11,115 MW of generation capacity. Maintenance outages at these units are scheduled during the spring or fall off-peak demand periods. We meet our fuel requirements at our coal-fueled generation facilities in PJM and MISO with coal purchased from multiple suppliers under contracts of various lengths and transported to the facilities by either railcar or barges. We meet our fuel requirements in ERCOT using lignite that we mine at the Oak Grove generation facility, coal purchased and transported by railcar at the Coleto Creek generation facility and a blend of lignite that we mine and coal purchased and transported by railcar at our Martin Lake generation facility.


Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

See Note 1314 to the Financial Statements for discussion of material litigation including matters related to our generation facilities and EPA reviews.

which Vistra is a party.

Item 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Vistra currently owns and operates, or is in the process of reclaiming, 12 surface lignite coal mines in Texas to provide fuel for its electricity generation facilities. Vistra also owns or leases, and is in the process of reclaiming, two waste-to-energy surface facilities in Pennsylvania. These mining operations are regulated by the MSHA under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, as amended (the Mine Act), as well as other federal and state regulatory agencies such as the RCT and Office of Surface Mining. The MSHA inspects U.S. mines, including Vistra's mines, on a regular basis, and if it believes a violation of the Mine Act or any health or safety standard or other regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation or order, generally accompanied by a proposed fine or assessment. Such citations and orders can be contested and appealed, which often results in a reduction of the severity and amount of fines and assessments and sometimes results in dismissal. Disclosure of MSHA citations, orders and proposed assessments are provided in Exhibit 95.1 to this annual report on Form 10-K.


48

PART II

Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Vistra's common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol "VST".Vistra's authorized capital stock consists of 1,800,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

Since May 10, 2017, Vistra's common stock has been listed on the NYSE under the symbol "VST".

On April 9, 2018 (Merger Date), pursuant to the Merger Agreement, 94,409,573 shares of Vistra common stock were issued to the former Dynegy stockholders, as well as converting stock options, equity-based awards, tangible equity units and warrants.

As of February 23, 2021,2024, there were 483,716,012 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 698472 stockholders of record.

In November 2018, we announced thatThe Board has authority to declare dividends to the holders of our common stock. The Board had adopted a dividend program which we initiatedintends to continue the payment of dividends to the holders of the Company's common stock in the first quarterfuture. The declaration and payment of 2019. Our common stockholders are entitled to receive any suchfuture dividends, or other distributions ratably. In February 2021, our Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share thathowever, will be paid in March 2021. Each dividend underat the program is subject to declaration bydiscretion of the Board and thus, may be subject towill depend on numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, ourVistra's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, Delaware law and contractual limitations. For additional details, see Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 14 to the Financial Statements

Stock Performance Graph

The performance graph below compares Vistra's cumulative total return on common stock forduring the five-year period from May 10, 2017 (the date we were listed on the NYSE)December 31, 2018 through December 31, 20202023 with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the S&P Utility Index (S&P Utilities). The graph below compares the return in each period assuming that $100 was invested at May 10, 2017December 31, 2018 in Vistra's common stock, the S&P 500 and the S&P Utilities, and that all dividends were reinvested.
vistra-20201231_g1.jpg1793
December 31,
201820192020202120222023
Vistra Corp.$100.00 $102.48 $90.41 $108.08 $113.57 $193.89 
S&P 500$100.00 $131.47 $155.65 $200.59 $163.98 $207.04 
S&P Utilities$100.00 $126.35 $127.01 $149.46 $151.79 $141.05 

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

49

Share Repurchase ProgramPurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer

The following table provides information about our repurchase of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as amended,common stock, during the quarterthree months ended December 31, 2020.2023.
Total Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced ProgramMaximum Dollar Amount of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Program (in millions)
October 1 - October 31, 2020— $— — $332 
November 1 - November 30, 2020— $— — $332 
December 1 - December 31, 2020— $— — $332 
For the quarter ended December 31, 2020— $— — $332 
PeriodTotal Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid per ShareTotal Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced ProgramMaximum Dollar Amount of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Program (in millions)
October 1 - October 31, 20234,246,310 $32.15 4,246,310 $993 
November 1 - November 30, 20233,682,876 $34.81 3,682,876 $865 
December 1 - December 31, 20233,061,650 $37.55 3,061,650 $750 
For the quarter ended December 31, 202310,990,836 $34.54 10,990,836 $750 

In September 2020,October 2021, we announced that the Board had authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $1.5$2.0 billion of our outstanding common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program became effective January 1, 2021, at which timeon October 11, 2021. In August 2022, March 2023 and February 2024, the Prior Share Repurchase Plan (described below)Board authorized incremental amounts of $1.25 billion, $1.0 billion and all$1.5 billion, respectively, for repurchases to bring the total authorized amounts remaining thereunder terminated as of such date.

Under the Share Repurchase Program, any purchases of shares of the Company's stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to plans complying with the Exchange Act or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws. The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program or otherwise will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including our capital allocation priorities,to $5.75 billion. We expect to complete repurchases under the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements.

In June 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized a share repurchase program under which up to $500 million of our outstanding common stock could be purchased, and in November 2018, we announced that the Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program under which up to $1.250 billion of our outstanding stock could be purchased, resulting in an aggregate $1.750 billion share repurchase program (Prior Share Repurchase Program). The Prior Share Repurchase Program terminated effective January 1, 2021.by the end of 2025.

See Note 1415 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.


Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]

Not applicable.


50

Item 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION, AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The discussion below, as well as other portions of this annual report on Form 10-K, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, management may make forward-looking statements orally or in other writing, including, but not limited to, in press releases, quarterly earnings calls, executive presentations, in the annual report to stockholders and in other filings with the SEC. Readers can usually identify these forward-looking statements by the use of such words as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “plans,” “projects,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes” or similar words. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. For more discussion about risk factors that could cause or contribute to such differences, see Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and other risks discussed herein. Forward-looking statements reflect the information only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events, developments, or other information. If Vistra does update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be drawn that additional updates will be made regarding that statement or any other forward-looking statements. This discussion is intended to clarify and focus on our results of operations, certain changes in our financial position, liquidity, capital structure and business developments for the periods covered by the consolidated financial statements included under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. This discussion should be read in conjunction with those consolidated financial statements and the related notes and is qualified by reference to them.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 should be read in conjunctiontogether with our consolidated financial statements and therelated notes to those statements.included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results are impacted by the effects of the Ambit Transaction, the Crius Transaction and the Merger (see Note Operations in our 2022 to the Financial Statements). The Form 10-K for a discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20182021 and for the year ended December 31, 20192022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 are included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results in our 2019 Form 10-K and2021, which is incorporated hereinhere by reference except for the operational results from the former ERCOT, PJM, NY/NE and MISO segments that were replaced by the Texas, East, West and Sunset segments in an update of our reportable segments in the third quarter of 2020. Operational results for the Texas, East, West and Sunset segments for the year ended December 31, 2018 and for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 are included in Results of Operations below to reflect this update of reportable segments.reference.

All dollar amounts in the tables in the following discussion and analysis are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Business

Vistra is a holding company operating an integrated retail and electric power generation business primarily in markets throughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive energy market activities including power generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users. Effective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to Vistra Corp. to distinguish from companies that are involved in the exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect our integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable power.

Operating Segments

Vistra has six reportable segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's CODM makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. See Notes 1 and 20 to the Financial Statements for further information concerning the updates to our reportable business segments.

51

Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance

Winter Storm UriProposed Merger with Energy Harbor

On March 6, 2023, Vistra Operations and its wholly-owned subsidiary (Merger Sub) entered into a Transaction Agreement with Energy Harbor pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Energy Harbor, with Energy Harbor surviving as an indirect subsidiary of Vistra. The Transaction Agreement, the Merger and the other Transactions were approved by each of Vistra's Board and Energy Harbor's board of directors. On February 16, 2024, we received approval from FERC to acquire Energy Harbor. FERC's approval was the last regulatory approval needed, and we anticipate closing on March 1, 2024. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Transaction Agreement.

50

Inflation Reduction Act of 2022

In February 2021,August 2022, the U.S. experienced an unprecedented winter storm Uri, bringing extreme cold temperaturesenacted the IRA, which, among other things, implements substantial new and modified energy tax credits, including a nuclear PTC, a solar PTC, a first-time stand-alone battery storage investment tax credit, a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) on book income of certain large corporations, and a 1% excise tax on net stock repurchases. Treasury regulations are expected to further define the scope of the legislation in many important respects over the next twelve months. The excise tax on stock repurchases is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements. Vistra is not subject to the central U.S., including Texas. On February 12, 2021, the Governor of Texas declared a state of disaster for all 254 countiesCAMT in the State2023 tax year since it only applies to corporations that have a three-year average annual adjusted financial statement income in responseexcess of $1 billion. We have taken the CAMT and relevant extensions or expansions of existing tax credits applicable to projects in our immediate development pipeline into account when forecasting cash taxes for periods after the then-forecasted weather conditions. The declaration certified that severe winter weather posed an imminent threat duelaw takes effect. See Note 1 for our accounting policy related to prolonged freezing temperatures, heavy snow,refundable and freezing rain statewide. On February 14, 2021, President Biden issued a federal emergency declaration for all 254 Texas counties.transferable PTCs and ITCs.

As partRepurchase of its annual winter season preparations, our power plant teams executed a significant winter preparedness strategy, which included installing windbreaksTRA Rights and large radiant heaters to supplement existing freeze protection and insulation and performing preventative maintenance on freeze protection equipment such as the insulation and automatic circuitry designed to keep pipes at the power plants from freezing. In addition, in anticipation of winter storm Uri we took additional steps to prepare, including procuring additional demineralized water supply trailers to ensure sufficient water availability to run for extended periods and verifying that freeze protection circuits were operational.Preferred Stock Issuance

This severe weather resulted in surging demand for power, gas supply shortages, operational challenges for generators, and a significant load shed event (i.e., involuntary outages to customers across the system for varying periods of time) that was ordered by ERCOT beginning on February 15, 2021 and continuing through February 18, 2021. The biggest challenges to our plants throughout the storm were securing adequate natural gas supplies for our gas plants and the handling of frozen fuel at our coal plants. Despite these challenges, we estimate that our fleet generatedOn December 29, 2023, Vistra repurchased (Repurchase) approximately 25 to 30%74% of the poweroutstanding beneficial interests in the TRA Rights to receive payments under the TRA from a select group of registered holders of the TRA Rights (Selling Holders) in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per repurchased TRA Right, totaling an aggregate purchase price for the Repurchase of approximately $476 million. The shares of Series C Preferred Stock were issued (see Note 15 to the Financial Statements) to the Selling Holders in exchange for the TRA Rights in a transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. As part of the transaction, on January 29, 2024, the gridCompany filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 registering the resale of the shares by the Selling Holders of Series C Preferred Stock from time to time under Rule 415 of the Securities Act. If the Company repurchases TRA Rights at any time during the height of180 days following December 29, 2023 at a price per TRA Right greater than $1.50, the outages, as comparedCompany will pay the Selling Holders an amount equal to our approximately 18% market share.such excess purchase price per TRA Right sold by the Selling Holders.

The overall financial impactOn January 11, 2024, Vistra repurchased an additional 43,494,944 TRA Rights from winter storm Uri is still being calculated, but Vistra expects it will have a material adverse impactselect group of registered holders of TRA Rights in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per repurchased TRA Right. Total consideration of $65 million was paid using cash on its financial results driven by generation output being constrained due to challenges with receiving a steady supply of fuel for some plants as well as challenges with handling fuel already on site given the freezing conditions. As a result of these challenges, Vistra had to procure power in the ERCOT market at prices at or near the price cap to meet its supply obligations. While the financial impacts of winter storm Uri to Vistra are not yet finalized, Vistra management preliminarily estimates the one-time adverse impact on pre-tax net income will be in the range of approximately $900 million to $1.3 billion.hand.

This estimated range is preliminaryOn January 31, 2024, Vistra announced a cash tender offer to purchase any and basedall outstanding TRA Rights in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per tendered TRA Right accepted for purchase prior to close of business on currently available information and management estimates. The final amountFebruary 13, 2024 (Early Tender Date), which included an early tender premium of $0.05 per TRA Right accepted for purchase. As of the estimated loss is subject to a varietyEarly Tender Date, 55,056,931 TRA Rights were accepted for purchase for total consideration of factors including, but not limited to, outstanding pricing, load, and settlement data from ERCOT (which is released at various intervals during a period of up to 180 days$83 million, which was paid using cash on hand. TRA Rights accepted for purchase after the transaction day); the outcome of potential litigation arising from this event (including any litigation that we may pursue or be a party to); or any corrective action taken by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the RCT, or the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portion of the supply chain that is currently being considered or may be considered by any such parties.

There have already been several announced efforts by the state and federal governments and regulatory agencies to investigate and determine the causes of this event and its impact on consumers. We have received a civil investigative demand from the Attorney General of Texas as well as a request for information from ERCOT related to this event and may receive additional inquiries. We are cooperating with these entities and are working to respond to these requests. Those efforts may result in changes in regulations that impact our industry includingEarly Tender Date, but not limited to additional requirements for winterization of various facets of the electricity supply chain including generation, transmission, and fuel supply; improvements in coordination among the various participants in the electricity supply chain during any future event; potential revisionsprior to the wayclose of business on February 28, 2024, will receive consideration of $1.45 per TRA Right accepted for purchase, which will be paid in which the ERCOT market compensates and incentivizes the continued operation of assets that only run during times of scarcity; and potential changes to the types of plans permitted to be marketed to residential customers. We are continuing to monitor this situation as it develops but at this time cannot estimate any impacts of any legislative or regulatory changes or actions (including enforcement actions that may be brought against various market participants) that may occur as a result of the eventMarch 2024 using cash on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.hand.

As of the Early Tender Date, we have repurchased an aggregate 98% of the original outstanding TRA Rights, of which 10,430,083 TRA Rights remain outstanding.

See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for details of the TRA and Note 15 to the Financial Statements for details of the Series C Preferred Stock.

Financial and Operating Performance

The following are financial and operating highlights we achieved in the execution of our four strategic priorities:

Long-term, attractive earnings profile through the integrated business model.

We continued to execute our integrated business model through exceptional operational performance and capitalization of market opportunities which drove strong earnings during the year ended December 31, 2020, Vistra had total available liquidity2023, highlighting our competitive advantage of approximately $2.4coupling retail with our reliable and efficient generation fleet and wholesale commodity risk management capabilities which reduces the effects of commodity price movements and contributes to the stability and predictability of our cash flows.
Our commercial team focused on effectively and efficiently managing risk by opportunistically hedging for 2023 and beyond and optimizing our assets and business positions which led to strong plant operating performance and energy margins.
51

Our retail brands served the retail electricity and natural gas needs of end-use residential, small business and commercial and industrial electricity customers through multiple sales and marketing channels through products and solutions that differentiate from our competitors leading to an increase in residential customer counts within markets we continue to operate.

Strategic energy transition that supports the reliability and affordability of electricity.

In June 2023, an additional 350 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site commenced commercial operations.
As of June 30, 2023, the net proceeds of our Series B Preferred Stock were fully allocated to eligible solar and battery projects, pursuant to our Green Finance Framework.
We continued development and construction activities on the planned development of up to 300 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and up to 150 MW of battery ESS at retired or to-be-retired plant sites in Illinois.
We retired our Edwards coal generation plant on January 1, 2023.

Significant and consistent shareholder return of capital.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we paid dividends to common stockholders totaling $313 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, we repurchased 45 million shares for $1.3 billion under our stock repurchase program. Total shares repurchased under the program established in October 2021 are 143 million shares for $3.5 billion. See Note 15 to the Financial Statements for more information about our dividend and Share Repurchase Program.

Maintaining a strong balance sheet.

In December 2023, we issued $400 million of 6.950% Senior Secured Notes due 2033 and $350 million of 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2031 in which was primarily comprised ofthe net proceeds were used to fund the tender offer (Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer) to purchase for cash and availability under its revolving credit facility. During this storm event, Vistra was required to post a significant$759 million aggregate principal amount of collateral,certain notes in January 2024, including $58 million of 4.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2024, $345 million of 3.550% Senior Secured Notes due 2024 and $356 million of the 5.125% Senior Secured Notes due 2025.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, our operating segments delivered strong operating performance with a disciplined focus on cost management, while generating and selling essential electricity in a safe and reliable manner. Our performance reflected strong plant operating performance, summer scarcity pricing events in Texas and effectiveness of our comprehensive hedging strategy and the value we were able to ERCOT, clearinghouses forlock in as forward power and natural gas curves increased beginning in 2022.

Macroeconomic Conditions

With forward power and power transactionsnatural gas curves increasing during 2022 and other trading counterparties. Despite these posting requirements, Vistra has consistently maintained,the continued volatility in 2023, we have increased our hedging for future periods. As of December 31, 2023, we have hedged approximately 91% of our expected generation volumes on average for the two-year period 2024 through 2025 (with approximately 98% hedged for 2024 and itapproximately 83% hedged for 2025).

The industry continues to experience supply chain constraints that have reduced the availability of certain equipment and supply relevant to construction of renewables projects, and increased the lead time to procure certain materials necessary to maintain sufficient liquidityour natural gas, nuclear and coal fleet. We are proactively managing the increased costs of materials and supply chain disruptions and continuing to conduct its operationsprudently re-evaluate the business cases and timing of our planned development projects, which has resulted in a deferral of some of our planned capital spend for our renewables projects. In addition, we have proactively engaged our suppliers to secure key materials needed to maintain our existing generation facilities prior to future planned outages, and our Vistra Zero operational and development projects are anticipated to benefit from the ordinary course. Asimpact of February 25, 2021, Vistra had more than $1.5 billion of cashthe IRA. The inflationary environment continues to drive elevated interest rates, resulting in increased expected refinancing or borrowing costs, including project financing for our development projects and availability under its revolving credit facility to meet any of its liquidity needs.refinancing expected in connection with debt due in 2024 and beyond.

52

We are closely monitoring developments in the Russia and Ukraine conflict, specifically with regards to, (i) sanctions (or potential sanctions) against Russian energy exports and Russian nuclear fuel supply and enrichment activities, and (ii) actions by Russia to limit energy deliveries, which may further impact commodity prices in Europe and globally. In responseaddition, current policies being considered by the U.S. Congress, namely H.R. 1042 the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act, would restrict imports of uranium if signed into law. The bill passed out of the House of Representatives in December 2023, and the future of the bill remains uncertain as it awaits consideration in the Senate. Our 2024 refueling has not been affected by the Russia and Ukraine conflict, nor have we seen any disruption to the storm, Vistra committeddelivery of nuclear fuel. We are taking affirmative action by building strategic inventory and deploying mitigating strategies in our procurement portfolio to donate $5 millionensure we can secure the nuclear fuel needed to assist Texas communitiescontinue to operate our nuclear facility through potential Russian supply disruption. We work with a diverse set of global nuclear fuel cycle suppliers to procure our nuclear fuel years in advance, and individuals meet their most pressingtherefore, we expect to have enough nuclear fuel to support all our refueling needs, including support for food banks and food pantries, critical needs, bill payment assistance, and more. Vistra also assured residential customers across its retail brands that they will not see any near-term impact on their rates due to the winter weather event, though bills may increase due to high usage duringEnergy Harbor facilities following the cold weather periodexpected closing of the Transactions, through 2027. If imports from Russia are restricted, refueling operations of U.S. merchant nuclear power generators could be challenged in February.future years.

Investments in Clean Energy and CO2 ReductionsCapacity Markets

In September 2020, we announcedPJM, NYISO, ISO-NE, MISO and CAISO ensure long-term grid reliability through monthly, semiannual, annual and multi-year capacity auctions or bilateral transactions where power suppliers commit to making the planned development of upgeneration resources available to 668 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and 260 MW of battery ESS in Texas.the ISO as needed for a specific time period. We will only investparticipate in these growth projects if we are confident in the expected returns. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements forcapacity market auctions and also enter into bilateral capacity sales, and a summaryportion of our solarEast, West and battery energy storage projects.

In September 2020 and December 2020,Sunset segment revenues are impacted by the capacity auction results or bilateral contracts. The following information summarizes the auction pricing for zones in which we announced our intention to retire (a) all of our remaining coal generation facilities in Illinois and Ohio, (b) one coal generation facility in Texas and (c) one natural gas facility in Illinois, no later than year-end 2027 due to economic challenges, including incremental expenditures that would be required to comply with the CCR rule and ELG rule (see Note 13 to the Financial Statements), and in furtherance of our efforts to significantly reduce our carbon footprint. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for a summary of these planned generation retirementsoperate as well as our generation plant retirements in 2019.capacity auction and bilateral capacity sales by planning period. Performance incentive rules increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level.

COVID-19 PandemicPJM

WithReliability Pricing Model (RPM) auction results, for the global outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020, the U.S. government has deemed electricity generation, transmission and distribution as "critical infrastructure" providing essential services during this global emergency. As a provider of critical infrastructure, Vistra has an obligation to provide critically needed power to homes, businesses, hospitals and other customers. Vistra remains focused on protecting the health and well-being of its employees and the communitieszones in which it operates while assuring the continuity of its business operations.our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2023-20242024-2025
(average price per MW-day)
RTO zone$34.13 $28.92 
ComEd zone34.13 28.92 
MAAC zone49.49 49.49 
EMAAC zone49.49 54.95 
ATSI zone34.13 28.92 
DEOK zone34.13 96.24 

We have updatedOur capacity sales in PJM, net of purchases, aggregated by planning year and implemented our company-wide pandemic plan to address specific aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic to guide our emergency response, business continuity, and the precautionary measures wecapacity type through planning year 2024-2025, are taking on behalf of employees and the public. We will continue to monitor developments affecting both our workforce and our customers, and we have taken, and will continue to take, health and safety measures that we determine are necessary in order to mitigate the impacts. To date, as a result of these business continuity measures, the Company has not experienced material disruptions in our operations due to COVID-19.follows:

The fundamentals of the Company remain strong. Vistra believes it has sufficient available liquidity to continue business operations during this volatile period. As described under Available Liquidity, the Company has total available liquidity of $2.399 billion as of December 31, 2020, consisting of cash on hand and available capacity under our revolving credit facility (Revolving Credit Facility) of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. In addition, the maturities of our long-term debt are relatively modest until 2023. If the Company experienced a significant reduction in revenues or increases in costs or collateral requirements, the Company believes it would have additional alternatives to maintain access to liquidity, including drawing upon available liquidity or reductions to capital expenditures, planned voluntary debt repayments or operating costs. As a result of the Company's ongoing initiatives, the Company believes it is well-positioned to be able to respond to changes in customer demand, regulation or other factors impacting the Company's business related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In response to the economic and employment impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak, various states have instituted moratoriums or other conditions on disconnections for retail electricity customers. For example, in March and April 2020, the PUCT issued multiple orders requiring REPs in the ERCOT market to suspend late fees for residential customers through May 15, 2020, and to offer deferred payment plans to customers upon request. The PUCT also enacted the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program whereby REPs must forego disconnecting customers certified as experiencing COVID-19-related hardship, and if such customer would otherwise be subject to disconnection and meets other qualifications, such REP would request suppression of the delivery charges from the transmission and distribution utility and request a proxy energy charge reimbursement from the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program of $0.04/kWh. The PUCT ceased accepting new enrollments under the COVID-19 Electricity Relief Program after August 31, 2020, and the disconnection protections and financial assistance expired after September 30, 2020.

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for a summary of certain anticipated tax-related impacts of the CARES Act to the Company.
2023-20242024-2025
East
Segment
Sunset SegmentEast
Segment
Sunset Segment
CP auction capacity sold, net (MW)5,811 1,667 5,567 1,338 
Bilateral capacity sold, net (MW)378 166 400 38 
Total segment capacity sold, net (MW)6,189 1,833 5,967 1,376 
Average price per MW-day$38.61 $36.82 $36.80 $75.11 

53

NYISO

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented potential new risksmost recent seasonal auction results for NYISO's Rest-of-State zones, in which the capacity for our Independence plant clears, are as follows for each planning period:
Winter
2023 - 2024
Price per kW-month$3.83 

Due to the Company's business. Although thereshort-term, seasonal nature of the NYISO capacity auctions, we monetize the majority of our capacity through bilateral trades. Our capacity sales, aggregated by season through winter 2025-2026, are as follows:
East Segment
Winter
2023 - 2024
Summer
2024
Winter
2024 - 2025
Summer
2025
Winter
2025 - 2026
Auction capacity sold (MW)12 — — — — 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)1,132 873 591 175 59 
Total capacity sold (MW)1,144 873 591 175 59 
Average price per kW-month$2.27 $3.80 $3.44 $4.10 $4.10 

ISO-NE

The most recent Forward Capacity Auction results for ISO-NE Rest-of-Pool, in which most of our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2023-20242024-20252025-20262026-20272027-2028
Price per kW-month$2.00 $2.61 $2.59 $2.59 $3.58 

We continue to market and pursue longer term multi-year capacity transactions that extend through planning year 2027-2028.
East Segment
2023-20242024-20252025-20262026-20272027-2028
Auction capacity sold (MW)3,213 3,103 3,032 2,836 3,261 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)22 78 78 58 
Total capacity sold (MW)3,235 3,181 3,110 2,894 3,269 
Average price per kW-month$2.22 $3.12 $2.72 $2.60 $3.58 

MISO

The capacity auction results for MISO Local Resource Zone 4, in which our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2023-2024
Price per MW-day$9.25 

MISO capacity sales through planning year 2026-2027 are as follows:
Sunset Segment
2023-20242024-20252025-20262026-2027
Bilateral capacity sold in MISO (MW)1,702 984 423 101 
Total MISO segment capacity sold (MW)1,702 984 423 101 
Average price per kW-month$4.36 $4.34 $4.94 $4.59 

54

CAISO

Our capacity sales as part of the California Public Utilities Commission Resource Adequacy (RA) Program in California, aggregated by calendar year for 2024 through 2027 for Moss Landing, are as follows:
West Segment
2024202520262027
Bilateral capacity sold (Avg MW)1,880 1,770 1,250 750 

Electricity Prices

The price of electricity has a significant impact on our operating revenues and purchased power costs. Electricity prices are typically set by the cost to fuel a generation facility and the amount of fuel needed to generate one unit of electricity (Heat Rate) from the generation facility. Market Heat Rate is the implied relationship between wholesale electricity prices and the commodity price of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas plants).

Wholesale electricity prices generally track to increases or decreases in the price of natural gas, with exceptions such as when ERCOT power prices rise significantly during weather events as a result of the scarcity of available generation resources relative to power demand. The price of natural gas is volatile; therefore, the costs to operate a natural gas-fueled generation facility can be volatile as well. In contrast to our natural gas-fueled generation facilities, changes in natural gas prices have been logisticalno significant effect on the cost of generating power at our nuclear-, lignite- and coal-fueled facilities; however, all other factors being equal, changes in natural gas prices affect our operating margins on these facilities as electricity prices generally track to natural gas prices. Other variables that could impact electricity prices include, but are not limited to, the price of other fuels, generation resources in the region, weather, on-going competition, emerging technologies, and macroeconomic and regulatory factors.

The wholesale market price of electricity divided by the market price of natural gas represents the Market Heat Rate. Market Heat Rate can be affected by a number of factors, including generation availability, mix of assets and the efficiency of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas-fueled generation facilities) in generating electricity. Our Market Heat Rate exposure is impacted by changes in the availability of generation resources, such as additions and retirements of generation facilities, and mix of generation assets. For example, increasing renewable (wind and solar) generation capacity generally depresses Market Heat Rates, particularly during periods when total demand is relatively low. However, increasing penetration of renewable generation capacity may also contribute to greater volatility of wholesale market prices independent of changes in the price of natural gas, given their intermittent nature.

As a result of our exposure to the variability of natural gas prices and Market Heat Rates, retail sales and hedging activities are critical to our operating results and maintaining consistent cash flow levels. Our integrated power generation and retail electricity business provides us opportunities to hedge our generation position utilizing retail electricity markets as a sales channel. Our approach to managing electricity price risk focuses on the following:

employing disciplined, liquidity-efficient hedging and risk management strategies through physical and financial energy-related contracts intended to partially hedge gross margins;
continuing focus on cost management to better withstand gross margin volatility;
following a retail pricing strategy that appropriately reflects the value of our product offering to customers, the magnitude and costs of commodity price, liquidity risk and retail demand variability; and
improving retail customer service to attract and retain high-value customers.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We follow accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Application of these accounting policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses during the periods covered. The following is a summary of certain critical accounting estimates that are impacted by judgments and uncertainties and under which different amounts might be reported using different assumptions or estimation methodologies.

55

Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting

We enter into contracts for the purchase and sale of energy-related commodities, and also enter into other derivative instruments such as options, swaps, futures and forwards primarily to manage commodity price and interest rate risks. Under accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities, these instruments are subject to mark-to-market accounting, and the determination of market values for these instruments is based on numerous assumptions and estimation techniques.

Mark-to-market accounting recognizes changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in the financial statements as market prices change. Such changes in fair value are accounted for as unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses in net income with an offset to derivative assets and liabilities. The availability of quoted market prices in energy markets is dependent on the type of commodity (e.g., natural gas, electricity, etc.), time period specified and delivery point. Where quoted market prices are not available, the fair value is based on unobservable inputs, which require significant judgment. Derivative instruments valued based on unobservable inputs primarily include (i) forward sales and purchases of electricity (including certain retail contracts), natural gas and coal, (ii) electricity, natural gas and coal options, and (iii) financial transmission rights. In computing fair value for derivatives, each forward pricing curve is separated into liquid and illiquid periods. The liquid period varies by delivery point and commodity. Generally, the liquid period is supported by exchange markets, broker quotes and frequent trading activity. For illiquid periods, fair value is estimated based on forward price curves developed using proprietary modeling techniques that take into account available market information and other challengesinputs that might not be readily observable in the market. Any significant changes to date, therethese inputs could result in a material change to the value of the assets or liabilities recorded on our consolidated balance sheets and could result in a material change to the unrealized gains or losses recorded in our consolidated statements of operations. We estimate fair value as described in Note 16 to the Financial Statements.

Accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities allow for normal purchase or sale elections, which generally eliminate the requirement for mark-to-market recognition in net income. Normal purchases and sales (NPNS) are contracts that provide for physical delivery of quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting if the NPNS election is made and are accounted for on an accrual basis. Determining whether a contract qualifies for the normal purchase or sale election requires judgment as to whether or not the contract will physically deliver and requires that management ensure compliance with all associated qualification and documentation requirements. If it is determined that a transaction designated as a normal purchase or sale no longer meets the scope exception due to changes in estimates, the related contract would be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with immediate recognition through earnings.

See Note 17 to the Financial Statements for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Our income tax expense and related consolidated balance sheet amounts involve significant management estimates and judgments. Amounts of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as current and noncurrent accruals, involve estimates and judgments of the timing and probability of recognition of income and deductions by taxing authorities. Further, we assess the likelihood that we will be able to realize or utilize our deferred tax assets. If realization is not more likely than not, we would record a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets for the amount we would not expect to utilize, which would reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax amounts. When evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including the following:

the creation and timing of future income associated with the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in excess of deferred tax assets;
the existence, or lack thereof, of statutory limitations on the period that net operating losses may be carried forward; and
the amounts and history of income or losses, adjusted for certain non-recurring items.

Actual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of various items, including changes in income tax laws, our forecasted financial condition and results of operations in future periods, as well as final review of filed tax returns by taxing authorities.

56

Income tax returns are regularly subject to examination by applicable tax authorities. In management's opinion, the liability recorded pursuant to income tax accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions reflects future taxes that may be owed as a result of any examination.

See Notes 1 and 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of income tax matters.

Accounting for Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)

On the Effective Date, Vistra entered into the TRA with a transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued the TRA Rights for the benefit of the first-lien creditors of TCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Vistra reflected the obligation associated with TRA Rights at fair value in the amount of $574 million as of the Effective Date related to these future payment obligations. In December 2023, we repurchased approximately 74% of the TRA Rights to receive payments under the TRA from a select group of registered holders of the TRA Rights. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $82 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income due to increases in longer-term commodity price forecasts. As of December 31, 2023, the TRA obligation has been no material adverse impactadjusted to $171 million, and the expected undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA is estimated to be approximately $350 million. After giving effect to the January 2024 additional repurchases and the January and February 2024 early tender offer repurchases, we have repurchased an aggregate 98% of the original outstanding TRA Rights, of which 10,430,083 TRA Rights remain outstanding as of the Early Tender Date.

The TRA obligation value is the discounted amount of projected payments to be made each year under the TRA, based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to:

the amount of tax basis related to (i) the Lamar and Forney acquisition and (ii) step-up resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale (which is estimated to be approximately $5.5 billion) and the allocation of such tax basis step-up among the assets subject thereto;
the depreciable lives of the assets subject to such tax basis step-up, which generally is expected to be 15 years for most of such assets;
a blended federal/state corporate income tax rate in all future years of 23.2%;
future taxable income by year for future years;
the Company generally expects to generate sufficient taxable income to be able to utilize the deductions arising out of (i) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (ii) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the Lamar and Forney Acquisition, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA in the tax year in which such deductions arise;
a discount rate of 15%, which represented our view at the Effective Date of the rate that a market participant would use based on the Company's 2020risk associated with the uncertainty in the amount and timing of the cash flows, at the time of Emergence; and
additional states that Vistra now operates in, the relevant tax rates of those states and how income will be apportioned to those states.

There may be significant changes, which may be material, to the estimate of the related liability due to various reasons including changes in federal and state tax laws and regulations, changes in estimates of the amount or timing of future consolidated taxable income, utilization of acquired net operating losses, reversals of temporary book/tax differences and other items. Changes in those estimates are recognized as adjustments to the related TRA obligation, with offsetting impacts recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements.

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

As part of business combination accounting, new fair values were established for all AROs assumed in the Dynegy Merger. A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an ARO associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assets. These liabilities primarily relate to nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining, and remediation or closure of coal ash basins. In estimating the ARO liability, we are required to make significant estimates and assumptions.

57

For the estimates and assumptions of the nuclear generation plant decommissioning, we use unit-by-unit decommissioning cost studies to provide a marketplace assessment of the expected costs (in current year dollars) and timing of decommissioning activities, which are validated by comparison to current decommissioning projects within the industry and other estimates. Decommissioning cost studies are updated for each of our nuclear units at least every five years unless circumstances warrant a more frequent update. In estimating the liability for December 31, 2023, we have included an assumption that Vistra receives a license extension of 20 years from the NRC to continue to operate Comanche Peak Units 1 and 2 through 2050 and 2053, respectively. The costs to ultimately decommission the facility are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees and therefore changes in estimates of the ARO do not impact Vistra's earnings.

The estimates and assumptions required for the mining land reclamation related to lignite mining, such as costs to fill in mining pits and interpretation of the mining permit closure requirements, are complex and require a significant amount of judgment. To develop the estimate of costs to fill in mining pits, we utilize a complex proprietary model to estimate the volume of the pit. A significant portion of the estimate is associated with the Asset Closure segment, thus related to closed facilities with changes in the estimate recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

These obligations are adjusted on a regular basis to reflect the passage of time and to incorporate revisions to the following significant estimates and assumptions:

estimation of dates for retirement, which can be dependent on environmental and other legislation;
amounts and timing of future cash expenditures associated with retirement, settlement or remediation activities;
discount rates;
cost escalation factors;
market risk premium;
inflation rates; and
if applicable, past experience with government regulators regarding similar obligations.

For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $516 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its mining reclamation and other coal ash remediation objectives. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we transferred zero, $61 million and zero, respectively, in ARO obligations to third parties for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation was reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.

See Note 22 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion of ARO obligations and adjustments made to the ARO obligation estimates during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment, in accordance with accounting standards related to impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. For our generation assets, possible indications include an expectation of continuing long-term declines in natural gas prices and/or Market Heat Rates or an expectation that "more likely than not" a generation asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. The determination of the existence of these and other indications of impairment involves judgments that are subjective in nature and may require the use of estimates in forecasting future results and cash flows related to an asset or group of operations. The situation surrounding COVID-19 remains fluidassets. Further, the unique nature of our property, plant and equipment, which includes a fleet of generation assets with a diverse fuel mix and individual generation units that have varying production or output rates, requires the use of significant judgments in determining the existence of impairment indications and the potentialgrouping of assets for impairment testing. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements for discussion of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Recoverability of long-lived assets is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group to the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group, through considering specific assumptions for forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures, forecasted fuel prices and forecasted operating costs. The carrying value of such asset groups is determined to be unrecoverable if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value.

58

If an asset group carrying value is determined to be unrecoverable, fair value will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded for the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows (income approach) and supported by available market valuations, if applicable. The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, Market Heat Rates, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted fuel prices. Another key assumption in the income approach is the discount rate applied to the forecasted cash flows. Any significant change to one or more of these factors can have a material impact on the Company'sfair value measurement of our long-lived assets. Additional material impairments related to our generation facilities may occur in the future if forward wholesale electricity prices decline in the markets in which we operate in or if additional environmental regulations increase the cost of producing electricity at our generation facilities.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, such as the intangible asset related to the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, respectively, are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually (we have selected October 1 as our annual impairment test date) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, such as the indicators used to evaluate impairments to long-lived assets discussed above or declines in values of comparable public companies in our industry.

As of December 31, 2023, our goodwill balances totaled $2.461 billion and $122 million for our Retail reporting unit and Texas Generation reporting unit, respectively. Under this goodwill impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, the excess carrying value is written off as an impairment charge. Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of a reporting unit with goodwill is more likely than not less than the fair value of that reporting unit. If the entity determines the carrying value, including goodwill, is not more likely greater than the fair value, no further testing of goodwill for impairment is required. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, cost factors, customer attrition, interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.

As of December 31, 2023, intangible assets with indefinite useful lives related to our retail trade names totaled $1.341 billion. Under this impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a retail trade name's carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, the excess carrying value is written off as an impairment charge.

Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of our retail trade name intangible assets is more likely than not less than the fair value. On the most recent testing date, we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade names exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included trade name financial performance, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, customer attrition and interest rates.

Results of Operations

Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra common stock increased $2.6 billion to income of $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 from a loss of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. For additional information see the following discussion of our results of operations,operations.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

In analyzing and planning for our business, we supplement our use of GAAP financial conditionmeasures with non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and liquidity increasesAdjusted EBITDA as performance measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our business that, when viewed (i) with our GAAP results and (ii) the longeraccompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures may provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that management uses to allocate resources, determine our ability to fund capital expenditures, assess performance against our peers, and evaluate overall financial performance, we believe they provide useful information for investors.

59

These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the virus impactsexclusion of GAAP financial measures and are, by definition, an incomplete understanding of Vistra and must be considered in conjunction with GAAP measures. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized; therefore, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the levelsame or similar names. We strongly encourage investors to review our consolidated financial statements and publicly filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.

When EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA is discussed in reference to performance on a consolidated basis, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is Net income (loss).

Vistra Consolidated Financial Results — Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

The following table presents net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2023:
Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$10,572 $3,823 $4,215 $914 $1,831 $— $(6,576)$14,779 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(9,046)(1,951)(2,031)(328)(776)(3)6,578 (7,557)
Operating costs(123)(894)(297)(58)(254)(74)(2)(1,702)
Depreciation and amortization(102)(544)(647)(79)(62)— (68)(1,502)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(858)(134)(82)(24)(51)(34)(125)(1,308)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (49)— — (49)
Operating income (loss)443 300 1,158 425 639 (111)(193)2,661 
Other income35 21 110 86 257 
Other deductions— (2)— — (5)— (7)(14)
Interest expense and related charges(20)21 — (2)(5)(742)(740)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (164)(164)
Income (loss) before income taxes424 354 1,161 454 633 (6)(1,020)2,000 
Income tax expense— — (1)— — — (507)(508)
Net income (loss)$424 $354 $1,160 $454 $633 $(6)$(1,527)$1,492 
60

Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Income tax expense— — — — — 507 508 
Interest expense and related charges (a)20 (21)— (8)742 740 
Depreciation and amortization (b)102 635 647 79 62 — 68 1,593 
EBITDA before Adjustments546 968 1,808 525 697 (1)(210)4,333 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions586 799 (1,117)(267)(455)(36)— (490)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (c)— — — — — — 135 135 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 78 78 
Transition and merger expenses— — — 47 50 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 49 — — 49 
PJM capacity performance default impacts (d)— — — — — 
Winter Storm Uri impacts (e)(52)— — — — — (48)
Other, net25 (2)12 60 (2)(113)(15)
Adjusted EBITDA$1,105 $1,770 $707 $263 $358 $(39)$(63)$4,101 
____________
(a)Includes $36 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $91 million in the U.S. and globally. As a result, COVID-19 may have a range of impactsTexas segment.
(c)Includes $29 million gain recognized on the Company's operations,repurchase of TRA Rights in December 2023 (see Note 8 to the full extentFinancial Statements).
(d)Represents estimate of anticipated market participant defaults or settlements on initial PJM capacity performance penalties due to extreme magnitude of penalties associated with Winter Storm Elliott.
(e)Includes the application of bill credits. The Company incentivized certain large commercial and scopeindustrial customers to curtail their usage during Winter Storm Uri by providing bill credits for use in future periods. The Company believes the inclusion of the bill credits as a reduction to Adjusted EBITDA in the years in which such bill credits are currently unknown. See Part I, Item 1A Risk FactorsThe outbreak of COVID-19, or theapplied more accurately reflects its operating performance. We estimate remaining bill credit amounts to be applied in future outbreak of any other highly infectious or contagious diseases, could have a materialperiods for 2024 (approximately $11 million) and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations2025 (approximately $26 million).

AcquisitionsThe following table presents net income (loss), EBITDA and Mergeradjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022:

Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$9,455 $3,733 $3,706 $336 $868 $384 $(4,754)$13,728 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(7,169)(2,968)(3,546)(481)(670)(322)4,755 (10,401)
Operating costs(143)(808)(255)(42)(251)(145)(1)(1,645)
Depreciation and amortization(145)(537)(706)(42)(66)(31)(69)(1,596)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(826)(131)(66)(21)(35)(44)(66)(1,189)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (74)— — (74)
Operating income (loss)1,172 (711)(867)(250)(228)(158)(135)(1,177)
61


Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Other income78 — 16 13 117 
Other deductions(2)(2)— — (2)(4)
Interest expense and related charges(14)20 (3)(3)(3)(371)(368)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (128)(128)
Income (loss) before income taxes1,158 (615)(868)(238)(230)(147)(620)(1,560)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — 350 350 
Net income (loss)$1,158 $(615)$(868)$(238)$(230)$(147)$(270)$(1,210)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — (350)(350)
Interest expense and related charges (a)14 (20)(6)371 368 
Depreciation and amortization (b)145 623 706 42 66 31 69 1,682 
EBITDA before Adjustments1,317 (12)(159)(202)(161)(113)(180)490 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(291)1,610 759 351 100 (19)— 2,510 
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — — (3)— 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts— (2)(1)— — — 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 128 128 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 65 65 
Transition and merger expenses— — — — 13 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 74 — — 74 
Winter Storm Uri (c)(141)(178)— — — — — (319)
Other, net31 20 13 10 (62)23 
Adjusted EBITDA$923 $1,438 $608 $152 $42 $(125)$(44)$2,994 
____________
(a)Includes $250 million of unrealized mark-to-market net gains on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $86 million in the Texas segment.
(c)Adjusted EBITDA impacts of Winter Storm Uri reflects $183 million related to a reduction in the allocation of ERCOT default uplift charges which were expected to be paid over several decades under protocols existing at the time of the storm and $144 million related to the application of bill credits to large commercial and industrial customers that curtailed their usage during Winter Storm Uri. The adjustment for ERCOT default uplift charges relates to (i) ERCOT receiving payments that reduced the market wide default balance and (ii) the fourth quarter 2022 derecognition of the remaining default balance in connection with a settlement between Brazos and ERCOT.
Operating income increased $3.838 billion to $2.661 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Results for the year ended December 31, 2023 were favorably impacted by $490 million in pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market gains on derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving down in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $2.510 billion in pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market losses on commodity derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving up materially in the year ended December 31, 2022. See further information on our derivative results in Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities below.
62


Operating results for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 were favorably impacted by strong plant operating performance allowing us to realize the value created by our comprehensive hedging strategy, partially offset by lower than expected retail sales volumes due to unfavorable weather. The following table presents operational performance of our retail and generation segments.

Year Ended December 31,
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
2023202220232022202320222023202220232022
Retail sales volumes (GWh):
Retail electricity sales volumes:
Sales volumes in ERCOT70,27565,207
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest27,14732,882
Total retail electricity sales volumes97,42298,089
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities41,84934,78460,50254,5695,4625,134
Lignite and coal facilities23,89925,21116,57221,824
Nuclear facilities18,89319,688
Solar facilities781822
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities55.1 %48.8 %62.2 %57.2 %61.0 %57.1 %
Lignite and coal facilities70.9 %74.8 %41.3 %54.4 %
Nuclear facilities89.9 %93.6 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days115 %111 %112 %109 %90 %107 %79 %107 %112 %113 %
Heating degree days85 %108 %88 %123 %87 %99 %125 %109 %86 %99 %
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data.

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202220232022
Market pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$48.30 $62.17 PJM West Hub$39.22 $83.59 
AEP Dayton Hub$36.22 $79.51 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$2.53 $6.39 NYISO Zone C$30.38 $65.54 
Massachusetts Hub$41.02 $92.17 
Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$38.92 $82.03 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$1.90 $6.81 Northern Illinois Hub$32.67 $71.76 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$2.94 $9.16 CAISO NP15$63.92 $93.12 
____________
(a)Reflects the average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us.
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized.

63

For the year ended December 31, 2023, other income totaled $257 million driven by a gain of $89 million from the sale of property in Freestone County, Texas recorded in the Asset Closure Segment and $86 million in interest income due to holding a material cash balance anticipating the Energy Harbor transaction closing. For the year ended December 31, 2022, other income totaled $117 million driven by insurance proceeds of $70 million which primarily consists of business interruption claim proceeds recorded in the Texas segment. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The increase in consolidated interest expense and related charges of $372 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, is primarily due to (a) unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps of $36 million in 2023 compared to unrealized mark-to-market gains on interest rate swaps of $250 million in 2022 due to less volatility in interest rates in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, (b) an increase in interest paid/accrued of $63 million driven by higher effective interest rates in 2023 and (c) $21 million of commitment fees related to the Commitment Letter in the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The following table presents additional changes to net income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
Favorable change in realized revenue net of fuel driven by effectiveness of comprehensive hedging$— $483 $153 $113 $357 
Higher margins driven by increase in customers and interyear timing of power supply costs290 — — — — 
Winter Storm Uri bill credit runoff92 — — — — 
Impacts of mild weather in 2023(160)— — — — 
Change in operating costs due primarily to change in generation volumes— (86)(40)(17)
Change in SG&A and other(40)(65)(14)15 (42)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$182 $332 $99 $111 $316 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in depreciation and amortization43 (12)59 (37)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities(877)811 1,876 618 555 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 25 
PJM capacity performance default impacts— — (3)— (6)
Winter Storm Uri impact (ERCOT default uplift)(89)(182)— — — 
Other (including interest expenses)20 (3)— (31)
Change in Net income$(734)$969 $2,028 $692 $863 

To supplement the amounts and explanations noted above, primary drivers of results for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 include:

Ambit Transaction Comprehensive hedging strategyOn November 1, 2019 (Ambit Acquisition Date), Volt Asset Company, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the acquisition of Ambit (Ambit Transaction). See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Ambit TransactionEnergy-Related Commodity Contracts and business combination accounting.Mark-to-Market Activities below.

Crius Transaction Winter Storm Uri impactsOn July 15, 2019, Vienna Acquisition B.C. Ltd., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed. 2022 GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results continued to be materially impacted by Winter Storm Uri. In 2022, a $189 million default uplift liability to ERCOT was extinguished and resulted in net income during the acquisition ofyear, but had no impact on Adjusted EBITDA in 2022 as the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Crius Transaction and business combination accounting.initial liability incurred in 2021 was excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

Dynegy Merger Transaction SG&A expenses and otherOn the Merger Date, Vistra. 2023 is unfavorable compared to 2022 driven primarily by higher incentive compensation in 2023 and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for a summary of the Merger transaction and business combination accounting.insurance recoveries recorded in Texas in 2022.

Dividend Program
64

Asset Closure Segment Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
20232022
Operating revenues$— $384 $(384)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(3)(322)319 
Operating costs(74)(145)71 
Depreciation and amortization— (31)31 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(34)(44)10 
Operating loss(111)(158)47 
Other income110 16 94 
Other deductions— (2)
Interest expense and related charges(5)(3)(2)
Income (loss) before income taxes(6)(147)141 
Net loss$(6)$(147)$141 
Adjusted EBITDA$(39)$(125)$86 
Production volumes (GWh)— 9,401 (9,401)

For the year ended December 31, 2022, results and volumes for the Asset Closure segment include those from Edwards generation plant that we retired on January 1, 2023 and include unrealized hedging gains related to coal and power derivatives of $19 million. Operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 also include ongoing costs associated with the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results for 2023 are favorable to 2022 primarily due to the $89 million gain on sale of land in Freestone County, Texas.

Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities

As forward power prices materially increased in 2022, our generation segments (Texas, East, West and Sunset) aggressively sold forward power for 2023 and future years. While settled power prices in 2023 are lower than 2022, the strategic hedging allowed us to lock in margins for 2023 which resulted in realized revenue net of fuel above what we were able to recognize in 2022 (were mostly hedged going into 2022 so did not recognize the full benefit of settled prices). The forward power sales are also the drivers of the changes in unrealized gains/losses on hedging activities. As power prices increase/decrease in comparison to what our generation segments have sold forward, the generation segments recognize unrealized losses/gains. The retail segment procures power from the generation segments to serve future load obligations and thus changes in forward power prices have an inverse effect on unrealized mark to market for the retail segment as compared to the generation segments. This is evident in 2022 as material increase in forward power prices drove material unrealized losses in our generation segment, partially offset by unrealized gains in our retail segment. In November 2018, we announced that2023, forward power prices decreased slightly which resulted in unrealized gains in our generation segments which is partially offset by unrealized losses in our retail segment.

65

The table below summarizes the Board had adopted a dividend program which we initiatedchanges in commodity contract assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. The net change in these assets and liabilities, excluding "other activity" as described below, reflects $490 million in unrealized net gains and $2.51 billion in unrealized net losses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, arising from mark-to-market accounting for positions in the first quartercommodity contract portfolio.
Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of period$(3,148)$(866)
Settlements/termination of positions (a)1,643 1,218 
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)(1,153)(3,728)
Other activity (c)(82)228 
Commodity contract net liability at end of period$(2,740)$(3,148)
____________
(a)Represents reversals of 2019. Seepreviously recognized unrealized gains and losses upon settlement/termination (offsets realized gains/(losses) recognized in the settlement period). Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(b)Represents unrealized net gains/(losses) recognized, reflecting the effect of changes in fair value. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(c)Represents changes in fair value of positions due to receipt or payment of cash not reflected in unrealized gains or losses. Amounts are generally related to premiums related to options purchased or sold as well as certain margin deposits classified as settlement for certain transactions executed on the CME.

The following maturity table presents the net commodity contract liability arising from recognition of fair values at December 31, 2023, scheduled by the source of fair value and contractual settlement dates of the underlying positions.
Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2023
Source of Fair ValueLess than
1 year
1-3 years4-5 yearsExcess of
5 years
Total
Prices actively quoted$(725)$(207)$$— $(929)
Prices provided by other external sources(358)(409)— — (767)
Prices based on models(355)(454)(138)(97)(1,044)
Total$(1,438)$(1,070)$(135)$(97)$(2,740)

We have engaged in natural gas hedging activities to mitigate the risk of higher or lower wholesale electricity prices that have corresponded to increases or declines in natural gas prices. When natural gas prices are elevated or depressed, we continue to seek opportunities to manage our wholesale power price exposure through hedging activities, including forward wholesale and retail electricity sales.

Estimated hedging levels for generation volumes in our Texas, East, West and Sunset segments as of December 31, 2023 were as follows:
20242025
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation:
Texas96 %93 %
Sunset96 %58 %
Natural Gas Generation:
Texas89 %80 %
East99 %80 %
West100 %81 %

66

Financial Condition

Cash Flows

Operating Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022Cash provided by operating activities totaled $5.453 billion and $485 million in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The favorable change of $4.968 billion was primarily driven by (a) a decrease in net margin deposits (return of cash) of $1.899 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to an increase in net margin deposits of $1.874 billion in the year ended December 31, 2022 related to commodity contracts which support our comprehensive hedging strategy, including the impacts of cash margin deposits returned and replaced with amounts posted under an affiliate financing agreement (see Note 1411 to the Financial StatementsStatements) and (b) an increase in cash from operating income exclusive of net margin deposits, partially offset by $544 million of securitization proceeds from ERCOT in the year ended December 31, 2022 (see Note 1 to the Financial Statements).

Depreciation and amortization — Depreciation and amortization expense reported as a reconciling adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows exceeds the amount reported in the consolidated statements of operations by $454 million, $451 million and $297 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The difference represents amortization of nuclear fuel, which is reported as fuel costs in the consolidated statements of operations consistent with industry practice, and amortization of intangible net assets and liabilities that are reported in various other consolidated statements of operations line items including operating revenues and fuel and purchased power costs and delivery fees (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).

Investing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $2.145 billion and $1.239 billion in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase of $906 million was driven by (a) $543 million in higher net purchases of environmental allowances and (b) a $375 million increase in capital expenditures due primarily to continued development of our solar and energy storage generation facilities (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), partially offset by $37 million in higher proceeds from the sale of assets driven by our sale of property in Freestone County, Texas in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
20232022
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments$(764)$(628)(136)
Nuclear fuel purchases(214)(198)(16)
Growth and development expenditures(698)(475)(223)
Total capital expenditures(1,676)(1,301)(375)
Net sales (purchases) of environmental allowances(571)(28)(543)
Net sales of (investments in) nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities(23)(23)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment115 78 37 
Other investing activity10 35 (25)
Cash used in investing activities$(2,145)$(1,239)$(906)

67

Financing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022 — Cash used in financing activities totaled $294 million and $80 million in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The $214 million increase in cash used was driven by (a) the net repayment of $1.075 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 of short-term debt and accounts receivable financing amounts borrowed in the year ended December 31, 2022 driven by changes in collateral posting requirements and (b) $1.5 billion principal amount of senior secured notes issued in May 2022, partially offset by (1) $2.5 billion principal amount of senior secured and senior unsecured notes issued in September 2023 and December 2023, of which $750 million will be used to fund cash tender offers in January 2024, and (2) lower share repurchases in 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
20232022
Share repurchases$(1,245)$(1,949)$704 
Issuances of senior notes2,498 1,498 1,000 
Other net long-term borrowings (repayments), including the forward capacity agreements(33)(251)218 
Net short-term borrowings (repayments)(650)650 (1,300)
Net borrowings (repayments) under the accounts receivable financing facilities(425)425 (850)
Dividends paid to common stockholders(313)(302)(11)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders(150)(151)
Other financing activity24 — 24 
Cash used in financing activities$(294)$(80)$(214)

Collateral Financing Agreement With Affiliate

On June 15, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into a facility agreement (Facility Agreement) with a Delaware trust formed by the Company that sold 450,000 pre-capitalized trust securities (P-Caps) redeemable May 17, 2028 for an initial purchase price of $450 million. The Trust is not consolidated by Vistra. The Trust invested the proceeds from the sale of the P-Caps in a portfolio of either (a) U.S. Treasury securities (Treasuries) or (b) Treasuries and/or principal and interest strips of Treasuries (Treasury Strips, and together with the Treasuries and cash denominated in U.S. dollars, the Eligible Assets). At the direction of Vistra Operations, the Eligible Assets held by the Trust will be (i) delivered to one or more information about our dividenddesignated subsidiaries of Vistra Operations in order to allow such subsidiaries to use the Eligible Assets to meet certain posting obligations with counterparties, and/or (ii) pledged as collateral support for a letter of credit program.

Share Repurchase ProgramUnder the Facility Agreement, Vistra Operations will have the right (Issuance Right), from time to time, to require the Trust to purchase from Vistra Operations up to $450 million aggregate principal amount of Vistra Operations' 7.233% senior secured notes due 2028 (7.233% Senior Secured Notes) in exchange for the delivery of all or a portion of the Treasuries and Treasury Strips corresponding to the portion of the issuance right exercised at such time.

In September 2020, we announced thatAs of December 31, 2023, all of the Board had authorizedEligible Assets were being utilized to meet a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $1.5 billionportion of our outstanding common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program was effective January 1, 2021, at which time the Prior Share Repurchase Plan terminated. From January 1, 2021 through February 23, 2021, 5,902,720 shares of our common stock had been repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program for $125 million at an average price per share of common stock of $21.15,current and at February 23, 2021, $1.375 billion was available for repurchase under the Share Repurchase Program. See Note 14 to the Financial Statements for more information concerning the Share Repurchase Program and the Prior Share Repurchase Program.future collateral posting obligations.

The Trust will terminate at any time prior to May 17, 2028 and distribute the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes to the holders of the P-Caps if its sole assets consist of 7.233% Senior Secured Notes that Vistra Operations is no longer entitled to repurchase.

See Note 11 for additional details of the collateral financing agreement with affiliate.

Debt Activity

We have stated our objective to reduce our consolidated net leverage. We also intend to continue to simplify and optimize our capital structure, maintain adequate liquidity and pursue opportunities to refinance our long-term debt to extend maturities and/or reduce ongoing interest expense. In 2019 and 2020, we completed several transactions, including the redemption and repayment of all of Parent's previously outstanding senior notes, that we believe, in the aggregate, advanced all of these goals. See Note 11 to the Financial StatementsAccounting for details of our long-term debt activity and Note 10 to the Financial Statements for details of our accounts receivable financing.

54

Capacity Markets

PJM — Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) auction results, for the zones in which our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2020-20212021-2022
(average price per MW-day)
RTO zone (a)$88.32 $140.00 
ComEd zone188.12 195.55 
MAAC zone86.04 140.00 
EMAAC zone187.87 165.73 
ATSI zone76.53 171.33 
PPL zone86.04 140.00 
____________
(a)Planning Year 2020-2021 includes Duke Energy Ohio Kentucky (DEOK) zone, which cleared at $130.00 per MW-day. RTO Zone excluding DEOK Zone was $76.53 per MW-day.Income Taxes

Our capacity sales, netincome tax expense and related consolidated balance sheet amounts involve significant management estimates and judgments. Amounts of purchases, aggregateddeferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as current and noncurrent accruals, involve estimates and judgments of the timing and probability of recognition of income and deductions by planning yeartaxing authorities. Further, we assess the likelihood that we will be able to realize or utilize our deferred tax assets. If realization is not more likely than not, we would record a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets for the amount we would not expect to utilize, which would reduce the carrying value of the deferred tax amounts. When evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available positive and capacity type through planning year 2022-2023, are as follows:
2020-20212021-20222022-2023
CP auction capacity sold, net (MW)9,065 9,309 125 
Bilateral capacity sold, net (MW)100 250 200 
Total segment capacity sold, net (MW)9,165 9,559 325 
Average price per MW-day$128.24 $157.30 $165.77 
negative evidence, including the following:

NYISO — The most recent seasonal auction results for NYISO's Rest-of-State zones,the creation and timing of future income associated with the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in which the capacity for our Independence plant clears, are as follows for each planning period:excess of deferred tax assets;
Summer
2021
Winter
2021 - 2022
Price per kW-month$2.71 $0.10 
the existence, or lack thereof, of statutory limitations on the period that net operating losses may be carried forward; and
the amounts and history of income or losses, adjusted for certain non-recurring items.

DueActual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the short-term, seasonal naturefuture impacts of the NYISO capacity auctions, we monetize the majorityvarious items, including changes in income tax laws, our forecasted financial condition and results of our capacity through bilateral trades. Our capacity sales, aggregatedoperations in future periods, as well as final review of filed tax returns by season through winter 2022-2023, are as follows:
Winter
2020 - 2021
Summer
2021
Winter
2021 - 2022
Summer
2022
Winter
2022 - 2023
Auction capacity sold (MW)144 — — — — 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)747 843 305 210 71 
Total capacity sold (MW)891 843 305 210 71 
Average price per kW-month$0.72 $2.43 $0.97 $1.13 $1.13 

ISO-NE — The most recent Forward Capacity Auction results for ISO-NE Rest-of-Pool, in which most of our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-2024
Price per kW-month$5.30 $4.63 $3.80 $2.00 

Performance incentive rules increase capacity payments for those resources that are providing excess energy or reserves during a shortage event, while penalizing those that produce less than the required level. We continue to market and pursue longer term multi-year capacity transactions that extend through planning year 2024-2025.
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-20242024-2025
Auction capacity sold (MW)3,085 2,798 2,996 2,496 — 
Bilateral capacity sold (MW)191 170 95 20 20 
Total capacity sold (MW)3,276 2,968 3,091 2,516 20 
Average price per kW-month$5.11 $4.57 $3.92 $2.16 $4.93 

55

MISO — The capacity auction results for MISO Local Resource Zone 4, in which our assets are located, are as follows for each planning year:
2020-2021
Price per MW-day$5.00 

MISO capacity sales through planning year 2023-2024 are as follows:
2020-20212021-20222022-20232023-2024
Bilateral capacity sold in MISO (MW)2,672 2,098 573 251 
CP auction capacity sold in PJM (MW)— 15 — — 
Total MISO segment capacity sold (MW)2,672 2,113 573 251 
Average price per kW-month$3.04 $3.12 $4.05 $3.69 

CAISO — Our capacity sales, aggregated by calendar year for 2021 through 2022 for Moss Landing, are as follows:
20212022
Bilateral capacity sold (Avg MW)1,020 831 

taxing authorities.

56

Key Operational Risks and ChallengesIncome tax returns are regularly subject to examination by applicable tax authorities. In management's opinion, the liability recorded pursuant to income tax accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions reflects future taxes that may be owed as a result of any examination.

Following is aSee Notes 1 and 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of certain key operational risks and challenges facing management and the initiatives currently underway to manage such challenges. These matters involve risks that could have a material effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation, prospects and the market price for our securities (including our common stock). See also Item 1A. Risk Factors in this annual report on Form 10-K for additional discussion on risks that could have a material effect on our results of operations, liquidity, financial condition, cash flows, reputation, prospects and the market price for our securities (including our common stock).income tax matters.

Accounting for Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)
Natural Gas Price
On the Effective Date, Vistra entered into the TRA with a transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued the TRA Rights for the benefit of the first-lien creditors of TCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Vistra reflected the obligation associated with TRA Rights at fair value in the amount of $574 million as of the Effective Date related to these future payment obligations. In December 2023, we repurchased approximately 74% of the TRA Rights to receive payments under the TRA from a select group of registered holders of the TRA Rights. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2023, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $82 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income due to increases in longer-term commodity price forecasts. As of December 31, 2023, the TRA obligation has been adjusted to $171 million, and Market Heat Rate Exposurethe expected undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA is estimated to be approximately $350 million. After giving effect to the January 2024 additional repurchases and the January and February 2024 early tender offer repurchases, we have repurchased an aggregate 98% of the original outstanding TRA Rights, of which 10,430,083 TRA Rights remain outstanding as of the Early Tender Date.

The priceTRA obligation value is the discounted amount of power is typically set by natural gas-fueled generation facilities, with wholesale prices generally tracking increases or decreases inprojected payments to be made each year under the price of natural gas, with exceptions such as those periods during which ERCOT power prices rise significantly as a result of the scarcity of available generation resources relative to power demand. In recent years, natural gas supply has outpaced demand primarily as a result of development and expansion of hydraulic fracturing in natural gas extraction; this supply/demand environment has resulted in historically low natural gas prices, and such prices have historically been volatile.

In contrast to our natural gas-fueled generation facilities, changes in natural gas prices have no significant effectTRA, based on the cost of generating power at our nuclear-, lignite- and coal-fueled facilities. Consequently, all other factors being equal, these nuclear-, lignite- and coal-fueled generation assets increase or decrease in value as wholesale electricity prices change either as a result of changes in natural gas prices or market heat rates, because of the effect on our operating margins. A persistent decline in the price of natural gas, ifcertain assumptions, including but not offset by an increase in market heat rates, would likely have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition, predominantly related to the production of power generation volumes in excess of the volumes utilized to service our retail customer load requirements and wholesale hedges.

The wholesale market price of electricity divided by the market price of natural gas represents the market heat rate. Market heat rate can be affected by a number of factors, including generation availability, mix of assets and the efficiency of the marginal supplier (generally natural gas-fueled generation facilities) in generating electricity. Our market heat rate exposure is impacted by changes in the availability of generation resources, such as additions and retirements of generation facilities, and mix of generation assets. For example, increasing renewable (wind and solar) generation capacity generally depresses market heat rates, particularly during periods when total demand is relatively low. However, increasing penetration of renewable generation capacity may also contribute to greater volatility of wholesale market prices independent of changes in the price of natural gas, given their intermittent nature. Decreases in market heat rates decrease the value of our generation assets because lower market heat rates result in lower wholesale electricity prices, and vice versa.

As a result of our exposure to the variability of natural gas prices and market heat rates, retail sales and hedging activities are critical to our operating results and maintaining consistent cash flow levels.

Our integrated power generation and retail electricity business provides us opportunities to hedge our generation position utilizing retail electricity markets as a sales channel. In addition, our approach to managing electricity price risk focuses on the following:limited to:

employing disciplined, liquidity-efficient hedgingthe amount of tax basis related to (i) the Lamar and risk management strategies through physicalForney acquisition and financial energy-related contracts intended(ii) step-up resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale (which is estimated to partially hedge gross margins;be approximately $5.5 billion) and the allocation of such tax basis step-up among the assets subject thereto;
continuing focus on cost managementthe depreciable lives of the assets subject to better withstand gross margin volatility;such tax basis step-up, which generally is expected to be 15 years for most of such assets;
following a retail pricing strategyblended federal/state corporate income tax rate in all future years of 23.2%;
future taxable income by year for future years;
the Company generally expects to generate sufficient taxable income to be able to utilize the deductions arising out of (i) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (ii) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the Lamar and Forney Acquisition, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA in the tax year in which such deductions arise;
a discount rate of 15%, which represented our view at the Effective Date of the rate that appropriately reflectsa market participant would use based on the valuerisk associated with the uncertainty in the amount and timing of our product offering to customers, the magnitude and costscash flows, at the time of commodity price, liquidity risk and retail demand variability;Emergence; and
improvingadditional states that Vistra now operates in, the relevant tax rates of those states and how income will be apportioned to those states.

There may be significant changes, which may be material, to the estimate of the related liability due to various reasons including changes in federal and state tax laws and regulations, changes in estimates of the amount or timing of future consolidated taxable income, utilization of acquired net operating losses, reversals of temporary book/tax differences and other items. Changes in those estimates are recognized as adjustments to the related TRA obligation, with offsetting impacts recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements.

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

As part of business combination accounting, new fair values were established for all AROs assumed in the Dynegy Merger. A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an ARO associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assets. These liabilities primarily relate to nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining, and remediation or closure of coal ash basins. In estimating the ARO liability, we are required to make significant estimates and assumptions.

57

For the estimates and assumptions of the nuclear generation plant decommissioning, we use unit-by-unit decommissioning cost studies to provide a marketplace assessment of the expected costs (in current year dollars) and timing of decommissioning activities, which are validated by comparison to current decommissioning projects within the industry and other estimates. Decommissioning cost studies are updated for each of our nuclear units at least every five years unless circumstances warrant a more frequent update. In estimating the liability for December 31, 2023, we have included an assumption that Vistra receives a license extension of 20 years from the NRC to continue to operate Comanche Peak Units 1 and 2 through 2050 and 2053, respectively. The costs to ultimately decommission the facility are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees and therefore changes in estimates of the ARO do not impact Vistra's earnings.

The estimates and assumptions required for the mining land reclamation related to lignite mining, such as costs to fill in mining pits and interpretation of the mining permit closure requirements, are complex and require a significant amount of judgment. To develop the estimate of costs to fill in mining pits, we utilize a complex proprietary model to estimate the volume of the pit. A significant portion of the estimate is associated with the Asset Closure segment, thus related to closed facilities with changes in the estimate recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

These obligations are adjusted on a regular basis to reflect the passage of time and to incorporate revisions to the following significant estimates and assumptions:

estimation of dates for retirement, which can be dependent on environmental and other legislation;
amounts and timing of future cash expenditures associated with retirement, settlement or remediation activities;
discount rates;
cost escalation factors;
market risk premium;
inflation rates; and
if applicable, past experience with government regulators regarding similar obligations.

For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $516 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its mining reclamation and other coal ash remediation objectives. During the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we transferred zero, $61 million and zero, respectively, in ARO obligations to third parties for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation was reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.

See Note 22 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion of ARO obligations and adjustments made to the ARO obligation estimates during the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment, in accordance with accounting standards related to impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. For our generation assets, possible indications include an expectation of continuing long-term declines in natural gas prices and/or Market Heat Rates or an expectation that "more likely than not" a generation asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. The determination of the existence of these and other indications of impairment involves judgments that are subjective in nature and may require the use of estimates in forecasting future results and cash flows related to an asset or group of assets. Further, the unique nature of our property, plant and equipment, which includes a fleet of generation assets with a diverse fuel mix and individual generation units that have varying production or output rates, requires the use of significant judgments in determining the existence of impairment indications and the grouping of assets for impairment testing. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements for discussion of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Recoverability of long-lived assets is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group to the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group, through considering specific assumptions for forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures, forecasted fuel prices and forecasted operating costs. The carrying value of such asset groups is determined to be unrecoverable if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value.

58

If an asset group carrying value is determined to be unrecoverable, fair value will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded for the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows (income approach) and supported by available market valuations, if applicable. The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, Market Heat Rates, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted fuel prices. Another key assumption in the income approach is the discount rate applied to the forecasted cash flows. Any significant change to one or more of these factors can have a material impact on the fair value measurement of our long-lived assets. Additional material impairments related to our generation facilities may occur in the future if forward wholesale electricity prices decline in the markets in which we operate in or if additional environmental regulations increase the cost of producing electricity at our generation facilities.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, such as the intangible asset related to the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, respectively, are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually (we have selected October 1 as our annual impairment test date) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, such as the indicators used to evaluate impairments to long-lived assets discussed above or declines in values of comparable public companies in our industry.

As of December 31, 2023, our goodwill balances totaled $2.461 billion and $122 million for our Retail reporting unit and Texas Generation reporting unit, respectively. Under this goodwill impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, the excess carrying value is written off as an impairment charge. Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of a reporting unit with goodwill is more likely than not less than the fair value of that reporting unit. If the entity determines the carrying value, including goodwill, is not more likely greater than the fair value, no further testing of goodwill for impairment is required. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, cost factors, customer attrition, interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.

As of December 31, 2023, intangible assets with indefinite useful lives related to our retail trade names totaled $1.341 billion. Under this impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a retail trade name's carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, the excess carrying value is written off as an impairment charge.

Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of our retail trade name intangible assets is more likely than not less than the fair value. On the most recent testing date, we performed a qualitative assessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade names exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included trade name financial performance, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, customer serviceattrition and interest rates.

Results of Operations

Net income (loss) attributable to attractVistra common stock increased $2.6 billion to income of $1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2023 from a loss of $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. For additional information see the following discussion of our results of operations.

EBITDA and retain high-value customers.Adjusted EBITDA

In analyzing and planning for our business, we supplement our use of GAAP financial measures with non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as performance measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our business that, when viewed (i) with our GAAP results and (ii) the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures may provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that management uses to allocate resources, determine our ability to fund capital expenditures, assess performance against our peers, and evaluate overall financial performance, we believe they provide useful information for investors.

59

These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures and are, by definition, an incomplete understanding of Vistra and must be considered in conjunction with GAAP measures. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized; therefore, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. We strongly encourage investors to review our consolidated financial statements and publicly filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.

When EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA is discussed in reference to performance on a consolidated basis, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is Net income (loss).

Vistra Consolidated Financial Results — Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

The following table presents net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2023:
Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$10,572 $3,823 $4,215 $914 $1,831 $— $(6,576)$14,779 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(9,046)(1,951)(2,031)(328)(776)(3)6,578 (7,557)
Operating costs(123)(894)(297)(58)(254)(74)(2)(1,702)
Depreciation and amortization(102)(544)(647)(79)(62)— (68)(1,502)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(858)(134)(82)(24)(51)(34)(125)(1,308)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (49)— — (49)
Operating income (loss)443 300 1,158 425 639 (111)(193)2,661 
Other income35 21 110 86 257 
Other deductions— (2)— — (5)— (7)(14)
Interest expense and related charges(20)21 — (2)(5)(742)(740)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (164)(164)
Income (loss) before income taxes424 354 1,161 454 633 (6)(1,020)2,000 
Income tax expense— — (1)— — — (507)(508)
Net income (loss)$424 $354 $1,160 $454 $633 $(6)$(1,527)$1,492 
60

Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Income tax expense— — — — — 507 508 
Interest expense and related charges (a)20 (21)— (8)742 740 
Depreciation and amortization (b)102 635 647 79 62 — 68 1,593 
EBITDA before Adjustments546 968 1,808 525 697 (1)(210)4,333 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions586 799 (1,117)(267)(455)(36)— (490)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (c)— — — — — — 135 135 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 78 78 
Transition and merger expenses— — — 47 50 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 49 — — 49 
PJM capacity performance default impacts (d)— — — — — 
Winter Storm Uri impacts (e)(52)— — — — — (48)
Other, net25 (2)12 60 (2)(113)(15)
Adjusted EBITDA$1,105 $1,770 $707 $263 $358 $(39)$(63)$4,101 
____________
(a)Includes $36 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $91 million in the Texas segment.
(c)Includes $29 million gain recognized on the repurchase of TRA Rights in December 2023 (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements).
(d)Represents estimate of anticipated market participant defaults or settlements on initial PJM capacity performance penalties due to extreme magnitude of penalties associated with Winter Storm Elliott.
(e)Includes the application of bill credits. The Company incentivized certain large commercial and industrial customers to curtail their usage during Winter Storm Uri by providing bill credits for use in future periods. The Company believes the inclusion of the bill credits as a reduction to Adjusted EBITDA in the years in which such bill credits are applied more accurately reflects its operating performance. We estimate remaining bill credit amounts to be applied in future periods for 2024 (approximately $11 million) and 2025 (approximately $26 million).

The following table presents net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022:

Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$9,455 $3,733 $3,706 $336 $868 $384 $(4,754)$13,728 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(7,169)(2,968)(3,546)(481)(670)(322)4,755 (10,401)
Operating costs(143)(808)(255)(42)(251)(145)(1)(1,645)
Depreciation and amortization(145)(537)(706)(42)(66)(31)(69)(1,596)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(826)(131)(66)(21)(35)(44)(66)(1,189)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (74)— — (74)
Operating income (loss)1,172 (711)(867)(250)(228)(158)(135)(1,177)
61


Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Other income78 — 16 13 117 
Other deductions(2)(2)— — (2)(4)
Interest expense and related charges(14)20 (3)(3)(3)(371)(368)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (128)(128)
Income (loss) before income taxes1,158 (615)(868)(238)(230)(147)(620)(1,560)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — 350 350 
Net income (loss)$1,158 $(615)$(868)$(238)$(230)$(147)$(270)$(1,210)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — (350)(350)
Interest expense and related charges (a)14 (20)(6)371 368 
Depreciation and amortization (b)145 623 706 42 66 31 69 1,682 
EBITDA before Adjustments1,317 (12)(159)(202)(161)(113)(180)490 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(291)1,610 759 351 100 (19)— 2,510 
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — — (3)— 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts— (2)(1)— — — 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 128 128 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 65 65 
Transition and merger expenses— — — — 13 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 74 — — 74 
Winter Storm Uri (c)(141)(178)— — — — — (319)
Other, net31 20 13 10 (62)23 
Adjusted EBITDA$923 $1,438 $608 $152 $42 $(125)$(44)$2,994 
____________
(a)Includes $250 million of unrealized mark-to-market net gains on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $86 million in the Texas segment.
(c)Adjusted EBITDA impacts of Winter Storm Uri reflects $183 million related to a reduction in the allocation of ERCOT default uplift charges which were expected to be paid over several decades under protocols existing at the time of the storm and $144 million related to the application of bill credits to large commercial and industrial customers that curtailed their usage during Winter Storm Uri. The adjustment for ERCOT default uplift charges relates to (i) ERCOT receiving payments that reduced the market wide default balance and (ii) the fourth quarter 2022 derecognition of the remaining default balance in connection with a settlement between Brazos and ERCOT.
Operating income increased $3.838 billion to $2.661 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Results for the year ended December 31, 2023 were favorably impacted by $490 million in pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market gains on derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving down in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $2.510 billion in pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market losses on commodity derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving up materially in the year ended December 31, 2022. See further information on our derivative results in Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities below.
62


Operating results for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 were favorably impacted by strong plant operating performance allowing us to realize the value created by our comprehensive hedging strategy, partially offset by lower than expected retail sales volumes due to unfavorable weather. The following table presents operational performance of our retail and generation segments.

Year Ended December 31,
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
2023202220232022202320222023202220232022
Retail sales volumes (GWh):
Retail electricity sales volumes:
Sales volumes in ERCOT70,27565,207
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest27,14732,882
Total retail electricity sales volumes97,42298,089
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities41,84934,78460,50254,5695,4625,134
Lignite and coal facilities23,89925,21116,57221,824
Nuclear facilities18,89319,688
Solar facilities781822
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities55.1 %48.8 %62.2 %57.2 %61.0 %57.1 %
Lignite and coal facilities70.9 %74.8 %41.3 %54.4 %
Nuclear facilities89.9 %93.6 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days115 %111 %112 %109 %90 %107 %79 %107 %112 %113 %
Heating degree days85 %108 %88 %123 %87 %99 %125 %109 %86 %99 %
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data.

Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202220232022
Market pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$48.30 $62.17 PJM West Hub$39.22 $83.59 
AEP Dayton Hub$36.22 $79.51 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$2.53 $6.39 NYISO Zone C$30.38 $65.54 
Massachusetts Hub$41.02 $92.17 
Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$38.92 $82.03 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$1.90 $6.81 Northern Illinois Hub$32.67 $71.76 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$2.94 $9.16 CAISO NP15$63.92 $93.12 
____________
(a)Reflects the average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us.
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized.

63

For the year ended December 31, 2023, other income totaled $257 million driven by a gain of $89 million from the sale of property in Freestone County, Texas recorded in the Asset Closure Segment and $86 million in interest income due to holding a material cash balance anticipating the Energy Harbor transaction closing. For the year ended December 31, 2022, other income totaled $117 million driven by insurance proceeds of $70 million which primarily consists of business interruption claim proceeds recorded in the Texas segment. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The increase in consolidated interest expense and related charges of $372 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, is primarily due to (a) unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps of $36 million in 2023 compared to unrealized mark-to-market gains on interest rate swaps of $250 million in 2022 due to less volatility in interest rates in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, (b) an increase in interest paid/accrued of $63 million driven by higher effective interest rates in 2023 and (c) $21 million of commitment fees related to the Commitment Letter in the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The following table presents additional changes to net income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
Favorable change in realized revenue net of fuel driven by effectiveness of comprehensive hedging$— $483 $153 $113 $357 
Higher margins driven by increase in customers and interyear timing of power supply costs290 — — — — 
Winter Storm Uri bill credit runoff92 — — — — 
Impacts of mild weather in 2023(160)— — — — 
Change in operating costs due primarily to change in generation volumes— (86)(40)(17)
Change in SG&A and other(40)(65)(14)15 (42)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$182 $332 $99 $111 $316 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in depreciation and amortization43 (12)59 (37)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities(877)811 1,876 618 555 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 25 
PJM capacity performance default impacts— — (3)— (6)
Winter Storm Uri impact (ERCOT default uplift)(89)(182)— — — 
Other (including interest expenses)20 (3)— (31)
Change in Net income$(734)$969 $2,028 $692 $863 

To supplement the amounts and explanations noted above, primary drivers of results for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022 include:

Comprehensive hedging strategy. See Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities below.

Winter Storm Uri impacts. 2022 GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results continued to be materially impacted by Winter Storm Uri. In 2022, a $189 million default uplift liability to ERCOT was extinguished and resulted in net income during the year, but had no impact on Adjusted EBITDA in 2022 as the initial liability incurred in 2021 was excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

SG&A expenses and other. 2023 is unfavorable compared to 2022 driven primarily by higher incentive compensation in 2023 and insurance recoveries recorded in Texas in 2022.

64

Asset Closure Segment Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022

Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
20232022
Operating revenues$— $384 $(384)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(3)(322)319 
Operating costs(74)(145)71 
Depreciation and amortization— (31)31 
Selling, general and administrative expenses(34)(44)10 
Operating loss(111)(158)47 
Other income110 16 94 
Other deductions— (2)
Interest expense and related charges(5)(3)(2)
Income (loss) before income taxes(6)(147)141 
Net loss$(6)$(147)$141 
Adjusted EBITDA$(39)$(125)$86 
Production volumes (GWh)— 9,401 (9,401)

For the year ended December 31, 2022, results and volumes for the Asset Closure segment include those from Edwards generation plant that we retired on January 1, 2023 and include unrealized hedging gains related to coal and power derivatives of $19 million. Operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 also include ongoing costs associated with the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results for 2023 are favorable to 2022 primarily due to the $89 million gain on sale of land in Freestone County, Texas.

Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities

As forward power prices materially increased in 2022, our generation segments (Texas, East, West and Sunset) aggressively sold forward power for 2023 and future years. While settled power prices in 2023 are lower than 2022, the strategic hedging allowed us to lock in margins for 2023 which resulted in realized revenue net of fuel above what we were able to recognize in 2022 (were mostly hedged going into 2022 so did not recognize the full benefit of settled prices). The forward power sales are also the drivers of the changes in unrealized gains/losses on hedging activities. As power prices increase/decrease in comparison to what our generation segments have sold forward, the generation segments recognize unrealized losses/gains. The retail segment procures power from the generation segments to serve future load obligations and thus changes in forward power prices have an inverse effect on unrealized mark to market for the retail segment as compared to the generation segments. This is evident in 2022 as material increase in forward power prices drove material unrealized losses in our generation segment, partially offset by unrealized gains in our retail segment. In 2023, forward power prices decreased slightly which resulted in unrealized gains in our generation segments which is partially offset by unrealized losses in our retail segment.

65

The table below summarizes the changes in commodity contract assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. The net change in these assets and liabilities, excluding "other activity" as described below, reflects $490 million in unrealized net gains and $2.51 billion in unrealized net losses for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, arising from mark-to-market accounting for positions in the commodity contract portfolio.
Year Ended December 31,
20232022
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of period$(3,148)$(866)
Settlements/termination of positions (a)1,643 1,218 
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)(1,153)(3,728)
Other activity (c)(82)228 
Commodity contract net liability at end of period$(2,740)$(3,148)
____________
(a)Represents reversals of previously recognized unrealized gains and losses upon settlement/termination (offsets realized gains/(losses) recognized in the settlement period). Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(b)Represents unrealized net gains/(losses) recognized, reflecting the effect of changes in fair value. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(c)Represents changes in fair value of positions due to receipt or payment of cash not reflected in unrealized gains or losses. Amounts are generally related to premiums related to options purchased or sold as well as certain margin deposits classified as settlement for certain transactions executed on the CME.

The following maturity table presents the net commodity contract liability arising from recognition of fair values at December 31, 2023, scheduled by the source of fair value and contractual settlement dates of the underlying positions.
Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2023
Source of Fair ValueLess than
1 year
1-3 years4-5 yearsExcess of
5 years
Total
Prices actively quoted$(725)$(207)$$— $(929)
Prices provided by other external sources(358)(409)— — (767)
Prices based on models(355)(454)(138)(97)(1,044)
Total$(1,438)$(1,070)$(135)$(97)$(2,740)

We have engaged in natural gas hedging activities to mitigate the risk of higher or lower wholesale electricity prices that have corresponded to increases or declines in natural gas prices. While current and forwardWhen natural gas prices are currentlyelevated or depressed, we continue to seek opportunities to manage our wholesale power price exposure through hedging activities, including forward wholesale and retail electricity sales.

57

Estimated hedging levels for generation volumes in our Texas, East, West and Sunset segments atas of December 31, 20202023 were as follows:

20212022
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation:
Texas91 %46 %
Sunset98 %57 %
Gas Generation:
Texas76 %16 %
East92 %23 %
West99 %%

The following sensitivity table provides approximate estimates of the potential impact of movements in power prices and spark spreads (the difference between the power revenue and fuel expense of natural gas-fired generation as calculated using an assumed heat rate of 7.2 MMBtu/MWh) on realized pretax earnings (in millions) taking into account the hedge positions noted above for the periods presented. The residual gas position is calculated based on two steps: first, calculating the difference between actual heat rates of our natural gas generation units and the assumed 7.2 heat rate used to calculate the sensitivity to spark spreads; and second, calculating the residual natural gas exposure that is not already included in the gas generation spark spread sensitivity shown in the table below. The estimates related to price sensitivity are based on our expected generation, related hedges and forward prices as of December 31, 2020.

20212022
Texas:
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$12 $63 
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(9)$(59)
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$12 $33 
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$(9)$(30)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(13)$(15)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$$
East:
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$$38 
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$(3)$(35)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(5)$(4)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$$
West:
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$— $
Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$— $(4)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$$
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$(1)$(1)
Sunset:
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$$40 
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(1)$(34)
20242025
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation:
Texas96 %93 %
Sunset96 %58 %
Natural Gas Generation:
Texas89 %80 %
East99 %80 %
West100 %81 %

5866

Financial Condition

Cash Flows

Operating Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022Cash provided by operating activities totaled $5.453 billion and $485 million in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The favorable change of $4.968 billion was primarily driven by (a) a decrease in net margin deposits (return of cash) of $1.899 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 as compared to an increase in net margin deposits of $1.874 billion in the year ended December 31, 2022 related to commodity contracts which support our comprehensive hedging strategy, including the impacts of cash margin deposits returned and replaced with amounts posted under an affiliate financing agreement (see Note 11 to the Financial Statements) and (b) an increase in cash from operating income exclusive of net margin deposits, partially offset by $544 million of securitization proceeds from ERCOT in the year ended December 31, 2022 (see Note 1 to the Financial Statements).

Depreciation and amortization — Depreciation and amortization expense reported as a reconciling adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows exceeds the amount reported in the consolidated statements of operations by $454 million, $451 million and $297 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The difference represents amortization of nuclear fuel, which is reported as fuel costs in the consolidated statements of operations consistent with industry practice, and amortization of intangible net assets and liabilities that are reported in various other consolidated statements of operations line items including operating revenues and fuel and purchased power costs and delivery fees (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).

Investing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $2.145 billion and $1.239 billion in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase of $906 million was driven by (a) $543 million in higher net purchases of environmental allowances and (b) a $375 million increase in capital expenditures due primarily to continued development of our solar and energy storage generation facilities (see Note 3 to the Financial Statements), partially offset by $37 million in higher proceeds from the sale of assets driven by our sale of property in Freestone County, Texas in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
20232022
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments$(764)$(628)(136)
Nuclear fuel purchases(214)(198)(16)
Growth and development expenditures(698)(475)(223)
Total capital expenditures(1,676)(1,301)(375)
Net sales (purchases) of environmental allowances(571)(28)(543)
Net sales of (investments in) nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities(23)(23)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment115 78 37 
Other investing activity10 35 (25)
Cash used in investing activities$(2,145)$(1,239)$(906)

67

Competitive Retail Markets and Customer RetentionFinancing Cash Flows

Competitive retail activity in ERCOT has resulted in retail customer churn as customers switch retail electricity providers for various reasons. Based on numbers of meters, our total retail customer counts increased approximately 1% in 2020 and approximately 2% in both 2019 and 2018. Based uponYear Ended December 31, 2020 results discussed below2023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2022 — Cash used in Results of Operations, a 1% decline in retail customers in ERCOT would result in a decline in annual revenues of approximately $57 million. In responding to the competitive landscapefinancing activities totaled $294 million and $80 million in the ERCOT market, we have attemptedyears ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The $214 million increase in cash used was driven by (a) the net repayment of $1.075 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 of short-term debt and accounts receivable financing amounts borrowed in the year ended December 31, 2022 driven by changes in collateral posting requirements and (b) $1.5 billion principal amount of senior secured notes issued in May 2022, partially offset by (1) $2.5 billion principal amount of senior secured and senior unsecured notes issued in September 2023 and December 2023, of which $750 million will be used to reduce overall customer losses by focusing on the following key initiatives:fund cash tender offers in January 2024, and (2) lower share repurchases in 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
20232022
Share repurchases$(1,245)$(1,949)$704 
Issuances of senior notes2,498 1,498 1,000 
Other net long-term borrowings (repayments), including the forward capacity agreements(33)(251)218 
Net short-term borrowings (repayments)(650)650 (1,300)
Net borrowings (repayments) under the accounts receivable financing facilities(425)425 (850)
Dividends paid to common stockholders(313)(302)(11)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders(150)(151)
Other financing activity24 — 24 
Cash used in financing activities$(294)$(80)$(214)

Collateral Financing Agreement With Affiliate
Maintaining competitive pricing initiatives on residential service plans;
Actively competingOn June 15, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into a facility agreement (Facility Agreement) with a Delaware trust formed by the Company that sold 450,000 pre-capitalized trust securities (P-Caps) redeemable May 17, 2028 for new customers in areas open to competition within ERCOT, while continuing to strive to enhancean initial purchase price of $450 million. The Trust is not consolidated by Vistra. The Trust invested the experience of our existing customers; we are focused on continuing to implement initiatives that deliver world-class customer service and improve the overall customer experience;
Establishing and leveraging our TXU EnergyTM brand inproceeds from the sale of electricitythe P-Caps in a portfolio of either (a) U.S. Treasury securities (Treasuries) or (b) Treasuries and/or principal and interest strips of Treasuries (Treasury Strips, and together with the Treasuries and cash denominated in U.S. dollars, the Eligible Assets). At the direction of Vistra Operations, the Eligible Assets held by the Trust will be (i) delivered to residential and commercial customers, asone or more designated subsidiaries of Vistra Operations in order to allow such subsidiaries to use the most innovative retailer in the ERCOT market by continuing to develop tailored product offeringsEligible Assets to meet customer needs; and
Focusing market initiatives largely on programs targeted at retaining the existing highest-value customers and to recapturing customers who have switched REPs, including maintaining and continuously refiningcertain posting obligations with counterparties, and/or (ii) pledged as collateral support for a disciplined contracting and pricing approach and economic segmentationletter of the business market to enhance targeted sales and marketing efforts and to more effectively deploy our direct-sales force; tactical programs we have initiated include improved customer service, aided by an enhanced customer management system, new product price/service offerings and a multichannel approach for the small business market.credit program.

Exposures RelatedUnder the Facility Agreement, Vistra Operations will have the right (Issuance Right), from time to Nuclear Asset Outagestime, to require the Trust to purchase from Vistra Operations up to $450 million aggregate principal amount of Vistra Operations' 7.233% senior secured notes due 2028 (7.233% Senior Secured Notes) in exchange for the delivery of all or a portion of the Treasuries and Treasury Strips corresponding to the portion of the issuance right exercised at such time.

Our nuclear assets are comprised of two generation units at the Comanche Peak facility, each with an installed nameplate generation capacity of 1,150 MW. As of December 31, 2020, these units represented approximately 6%2023, all of the Eligible Assets were being utilized to meet a portion of our total generation capacity. The nuclear generation units represent our lowest marginal cost source of electricity. Assuming both nuclear generation units experienced an outage at the same time, the unfavorable impact to pretax earnings is estimated (based upon forward electricity market prices for 2021 at December 31, 2020) to be approximately $1 million per day before consideration of any costs to repair the cause of such outages or receipt of any insurance proceeds. Also see discussion of nuclear facilities insurance in Note 13 to the Financial Statements to understand the importancecurrent and limits of our insurance protection.future collateral posting obligations.

The inherent complexitiesTrust will terminate at any time prior to May 17, 2028 and related regulations associated with operating nuclear generation facilities result in environmental, regulatory and financial risks. The operation of nuclear generation facilities is subjectdistribute the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes to continuing review and regulation by the NRC, covering, among other things, operations, maintenance, emergency planning, security, and environmental and safety protection. The NRC may implement changes in regulations that result in increased capital or operating costs and may require extended outages, modify, suspend or revoke operating licenses and impose fines for failure to comply with its existing regulations and the provisionsholders of the Atomic Energy Act. In addition, an unplanned outage at another nuclear generation facility could result in the NRC taking actionP-Caps if its sole assets consist of 7.233% Senior Secured Notes that Vistra Operations is no longer entitled to shut down our Comanche Peak units as a precautionary measure.

We participate in industry groups and with regulators to keep current on the latest developments in nuclear safety, operation and maintenance and on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. These groups include, but are not limited to, the NRC, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). We also apply the knowledge gained through our continuing investment in technology, processes and services to improve our operations and to detect, mitigate and protect our nuclear generation assets. Management continues to focus on the safe, reliable and efficient operations at the facility.

Cyber/Data Security and Infrastructure Protection Risk

A breach of cyber/data security measures that impairs our information technology infrastructure could disrupt normal business operations and affect our ability to control our generation assets, access retail customer information and limit communication with third parties. Any loss of confidential or proprietary data through a breach could materially affect our reputation, including our TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric brands, expose the company to legal claims and regulatory scrutiny or impair our ability to execute on business strategies.

59

We participate in industry groups and with regulators to remain current on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. These groups include, but are not limited to, the U.S. Cyber Emergency Response Team, the National Electric Sector Cyber Security Organization, the NRC and NERC.

While the Company has not experienced a cyber/data event causing any material operational, reputational or financial impact, we recognize the growing threat within the general market place and our industry, and are proactively making strategic investments in our perimeter and internal defenses, cyber/data security operations center and regulatory compliance activities. We also apply the knowledge gained through industry and government organizations to continuously improve our technology, processes and services to detect, mitigate and protect our cyber and data assets.

Seasonality

The demand for and market prices of electricity and natural gas are affected by weather. As a result, our operating results are impacted by extreme or sustained weather conditions and may fluctuate on a seasonal basis. Typically, demand for and the price of electricity is higher in the summer and winter seasons, when the temperatures are more extreme, and the demand for and price of natural gas is also generally higher in the winter. More severe weather conditions such as heat waves or extreme winter weather have made, and may make such fluctuations more pronounced. The pattern of this fluctuation may change depending on, among other things, the retail load served and the terms of contracts to purchase or sell electricity.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the Financial Statements. We follow accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Application of these accounting policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and revenues and expenses during the periods covered. The following is a summary of certain critical accounting policies that are impacted by judgments and uncertainties and under which different amounts might be reported using different assumptions or estimation methodologies.

Purchase Accounting

On November 1, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Ambit Transaction. On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the Crius Transaction. Each of the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction, respectively, was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Ambit Acquisition Date and the Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for the purchase price allocations for both the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction as well as the related adjustments through the respective measurement periods.

Determining fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires significant estimates and judgments. We determine fair value based on the estimated price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The acquired assets that involved the most subjectivity in determining fair value consisted of the customer relationship intangible assets. The assignment of fair value to the identifiable intangible assets requires judgment. We apply an income-based valuation methodology in measuring the customer relationships acquired, which include certain assumptions such as forecasted future cash flows, customer attrition rates, and discount rates. Customer relationship intangibles assets are generally amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which the economic benefits are realized over their estimated useful lives.

On the Merger Date, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, with Vistra continuing as the surviving corporation. The Merger was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Merger Date. Vistra is the acquirer for both federal tax and accounting purposes. The combined results of operations are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as of the Merger Date. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements.

60

The acquired assets and liabilities that involved the most subjectivity in determining fair value consisted of property, plant and equipment and executory contracts, primarily long-term service agreements for maintenance of power plants, a unit-specific power sales agreement and rail transportation contracts. The fair value of each power plant was estimated using a combination of an income approach and a market approach. The income approach is the present value of future cash flows over the life of each power plant that are based on management’s estimates of revenues and operating expenses, and appropriate discount rates. The estimate of long term prices of electricity and natural gas at each plant location that was used in developing forecasted revenues for the income approach was especially subjective, because as of the Merger Date, limited market information about future prices beyond the year 2022 was available. The market valuation method uses prices paid for a reasonably similar asset by other purchasers in the relevant market, with adjustments relating to any differences between the assets and locations. The determination of deferred tax assets was complex as it required assessing income tax rules and regulations and proposed regulations that impose limitations on the future use of acquired net operating losses and other limitations on deductions.

Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting

We enter into contracts for the purchase and sale of energy-related commodities, and also enter into other derivative instruments such as options, swaps, futures and forwards primarily to manage commodity price and interest rate risks. Under accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities, these instruments are subject to mark-to-market accounting, and the determination of market values for these instruments is based on numerous assumptions and estimation techniques.

Mark-to-market accounting recognizes changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in the financial statements as market prices change. Such changes in fair value are accounted for as unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses in net income with an offset to derivative assets and liabilities. The availability of quoted market prices in energy markets is dependent on the type of commodity (e.g., natural gas, electricity, etc.), time period specified and delivery point. Where quoted market prices are not available, the fair value is based on unobservable inputs, which require significant judgment. Derivative instruments valued based on unobservable inputs primarily include (i) forward sales and purchases of electricity, natural gas and coal, (ii) electricity, natural gas and coal options, and (iii) financial transmission rights. In computing fair value for derivatives, each forward pricing curve is separated into liquid and illiquid periods. The liquid period varies by delivery point and commodity. Generally, the liquid period is supported by exchange markets, broker quotes and frequent trading activity. For illiquid periods, fair value is estimated based on forward price curves developed using proprietary modeling techniques that take into account available market information and other inputs that might not be readily observable in the market. We estimate fair value as described in Note 15 to the Financial Statements.

Accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities allow for normal purchase or sale elections and hedge accounting designations, which generally eliminate or defer the requirement for mark-to-market recognition in net income and thus reduce the volatility of net income that can result from fluctuations in fair values. Normal purchases and sales are contracts that provide for physical delivery of quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting if the normal purchase or sale election is made. Accounting standards also permit an entity to designate certain qualifying derivative contracts in a hedge accounting relationship, whereby changes in fair value are not recognized immediately in earnings. Vistra does not have derivative instruments with hedge accounting designations.

We report derivative assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets without taking into consideration netting arrangements that we have with counterparties. Margin deposits that contractually offset these assets and liabilities are reported separately in the consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral.repurchase.

See Note 16 to11 for additional details of the Financial Statements for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.collateral financing agreement with affiliate.

Accounting for Income Taxes

Vistra files a U.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra is the corporate parent of the Vistra consolidated group. Pursuant to applicable U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.

61

Our income tax expense and related consolidated balance sheet amounts involve significant management estimates and judgments. Amounts of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as current and noncurrent accruals, involve estimates and judgments of the timing and probability of recognition of income and deductions by taxing authorities. In assessingFurther, we assess the likelihood that we will be able to realize or utilize our deferred tax assets. If realization is not more likely than not, we would record a valuation allowance against such deferred tax assets for the amount we would not expect to utilize, which would reduce the carrying value of realizationthe deferred tax amounts. When evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including the following:

the creation and timing of future income associated with the reversal of deferred tax assets, management considers estimatesliabilities in excess of deferred tax assets;
the amountexistence, or lack thereof, of statutory limitations on the period that net operating losses may be carried forward; and character
the amounts and history of future taxable income. income or losses, adjusted for certain non-recurring items.

Actual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of various items, including changes in income tax laws, our forecasted financial condition and results of operations in future periods, as well as final review of filed tax returns by taxing authorities.

56

Income tax returns are regularly subject to examination by applicable tax authorities. In management's opinion, the liability recorded pursuant to income tax accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions reflects future taxes that may be owed as a result of any examination.

See Notes 1 and 7 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of income tax matters.

Accounting for Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)

On the Effective Date, Vistra entered into a tax receivable agreement (the TRA)the TRA with a transfer agent. Pursuant to the TRA, we issued the TRA Rights for the benefit of the first-lien creditors of TCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Vistra reflected the obligation associated with TRA Rights at fair value in the amount of $574 million as of the EmergenceEffective Date related to these future payment obligations. AsIn December 2023, we repurchased approximately 74% of December 31, 2020, the TRA obligation has been adjustedRights to $450 million. Duringreceive payments under the TRA from a select group of registered holders of the TRA Rights. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, we recorded a decreasean increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $69$82 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income including the impactsdue to increases in longer-term commodity price forecasts. As of the CARES Act, changes to Section 163(j) percentage limitation amount, the impacts from the issuance of the final Section 163(j) regulations and the anticipated tax benefits from renewable development projects. At December 31, 2020,2023, the TRA obligation has been adjusted to $171 million, and the expected undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA is estimated to be approximately $1.4 billion. $350 million. After giving effect to the January 2024 additional repurchases and the January and February 2024 early tender offer repurchases, we have repurchased an aggregate 98% of the original outstanding TRA Rights, of which 10,430,083 TRA Rights remain outstanding as of the Early Tender Date.

The TRA obligation value is the discounted amount of projected payments to be made each year under the TRA, based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to:

the amount of tax basis related to (i) the Lamar and Forney acquisition and (ii) step-up resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale (which is estimated to be approximately $5.5 billion) and the allocation of such tax basis step-up among the assets subject thereto;
the depreciable lives of the assets subject to such tax basis step-up, which generally is expected to be 15 years for most of such assets;
a blended federal/state corporate income tax rate in all future years of 23.3%23.2%;
future taxable income by year for future years;
the Company generally expects to generate sufficient taxable income to be able to utilize the deductions arising out of (i) the tax basis step up attributable to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale, (ii) the entire tax basis of the assets acquired as a result of the Lamar and Forney Acquisition, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA in the tax year in which such deductions arise;
a discount rate of 15%, which represented our view at the EmergenceEffective Date of the rate that a market participant would use based on the risk associated with the uncertainty in the amount and timing of the cash flows, at the time of Emergence; and
additional states that Vistra now operates in, the relevant tax rates of those states and how income will be apportioned to those states.

We recognize accretion expense over the life of the TRA Rights liability as the present value of the liability is accreted up over the life of the liability. This noncash accretion expense is reported in the consolidated statements of operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. Further, thereThere may be significant changes, which may be material, to the estimate of the related liability due to various reasons including changes in federal and state tax laws and regulations, changes in estimates of the amount or timing of future consolidated taxable income, utilization of acquired net operating losses, reversals of temporary book/tax differences and other items. Changes in those estimates are recognized as adjustments to the related TRA Rights liability,obligation, with offsetting impacts recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements.

62

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

As part of business combination accounting, new fair values were established for all AROs assumed in the Dynegy Merger. A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an ARO associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assets. ChangesThese liabilities primarily relate to the estimatenuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining, and remediation or closure of coal ash basins. In estimating the ARO requires usliability, we are required to make significant estimates and assumptions. Specifically,

57

For the estimates and assumptions of the nuclear generation plant decommissioning, we use unit-by-unit decommissioning cost studies to provide a marketplace assessment of the expected costs (in current year dollars) and timing of decommissioning activities, which are validated by comparison to current decommissioning projects within the industry and other estimates. Decommissioning cost studies are updated for each of our nuclear units at least every five years unless circumstances warrant a more frequent update. In estimating the liability for December 31, 2023, we have included an assumption that Vistra receives a license extension of 20 years from the NRC to continue to operate Comanche Peak Units 1 and 2 through 2050 and 2053, respectively. The costs to ultimately decommission the facility are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees and therefore changes in estimates of the ARO do not impact Vistra's earnings.

The estimates and assumptions required for the mining land reclamation related to lignite mining, such as the costs to fill in mining pits and interpretinginterpretation of the mining permit closure requirements, are complex and require a significant amount of judgment. To develop the estimate associated with theof costs to fill in mining pits, we utilize a complex proprietary model to estimate the volume of the pit. A significant portion of the estimate is associated with the Asset Closure Segment,segment, thus related to closed facilities with changes in the estimate recorded to our consolidated statements of operations.

These obligations are adjusted on a regular basis to reflect the passage of time and to incorporate revisions to the following significant estimates and assumptions:

estimation of dates for retirement, which can be dependent on environmental and other legislation;
amounts and timing of future cash expenditures associated with retirement, settlement or remediation activities;
discount rates;
cost escalation factors;
market risk premium;
inflation rates; and
if applicable, past experience with government regulators regarding similar obligations.

For the next five years, Vistra is projected to spend approximately $516 million (on a nominal basis) to achieve its mining reclamation and other coal ash remediation objectives. During the years ended December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 2019,2021, we transferred $15zero, $61 million and $135 million,zero, respectively, in ARO obligations to third parties for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation was reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.

At December 31, 2020, the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning totaled $1.585 billion and includes an assumption that Vistra receives a license extension of 20 years from the NRC to continue to operate the Comanche Peak facility. The costs to ultimately decommission that facility are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees and therefore changes in estimates of the ARO do not impact Vistra's earnings.

See Note 2122 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion of ARO obligations and adjustments made to the ARO obligation estimates during the years ended 2020, 2019December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2018.2021.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment, in accordance with accounting standards related to impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. For our generation assets, possible indications include an expectation of continuing long-term declines in natural gas prices and/or market heat ratesMarket Heat Rates or an expectation that "more likely than not" a generation asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. The determination of the existence of these and other indications of impairment involves judgments that are subjective in nature and may require the use of estimates in forecasting future results and cash flows related to an asset or group of assets. Further, the unique nature of our property, plant and equipment, which includes a fleet of generation assets with a diverse fuel mix and individual generation units that have varying production or output rates, requires the use of significant judgments in determining the existence of impairment indications and the grouping of assets for impairment testing. See Note 2122 to the Financial Statements for discussion of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Recoverability of long-lived assets is determined by a comparison of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group to the net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group, through considering specific assumptions for forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures, forecasted fuel prices and forecasted operating costs. The carrying value of such asset groups is determined to be unrecoverable if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value.

58

If an asset group carrying value is determined to be unrecoverable, fair value will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded for the amount the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows (income approach) and supported by available market valuations, if applicable. The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, market heat rates,Market Heat Rates, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted fuel prices. Another key assumption in the income approach is the discount rate applied to the forecasted cash flows. Any significant change to one or more of these factors can have a material impact on the fair value measurement of our long-lived assets. Additional material impairments related to our generation facilities may occur in the future if forward wholesale electricity prices decline in the markets in which we operate in or if additional environmental regulations increase the cost of producing electricity at our generation facilities.

63

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, such as the intangible asset related to the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, respectively, are required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually (we have selected October 1 as our annual goodwillimpairment test date) or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist, such as the indicators used to evaluate impairments to long-lived assets discussed above or declines in values of comparable public companies in our industry.

As of December 31, 2023, our goodwill balances totaled $2.461 billion and $122 million for our Retail reporting unit and Texas Generation reporting unit, respectively. Under this goodwill impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, the excess carrying value is written off as an impairment charge. Accounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of a reporting unit with goodwill is more likely than not less than the fair value of that reporting unit. If the entity determines the carrying value, including goodwill, is not more likely greater than the fair value, no further testing of goodwill for impairment is required. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we appliedperformed a qualitative factorsassessment and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2020.2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, cost factors, customer attrition, interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.

Accounting guidance requires goodwill to be allocatedAs of December 31, 2023, intangible assets with indefinite useful lives related to our reporting units, and at December 31, 2020, $2.461 billion of our goodwill was allocated to our Retail reporting unit and $122 million was allocated to our Texas Generation reporting unit. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level.retail trade names totaled $1.341 billion. Under this goodwill impairment analysis, if at the assessment date, a reporting unit'sretail trade name's carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, (enterprise value), the estimated enterpriseexcess carrying value of the reporting unit is compared to the estimated fair values of the reporting unit's assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities at the assessment date, and the resultant implied goodwill amount is then compared to the recorded goodwill amount. Any excess of the recorded goodwill amount over the implied goodwill amount is written off as an impairment charge.

The determination of enterpriseAccounting standards allow a company to qualitatively assess if the carrying value of our retail trade name intangible assets is more likely than not less than the fair value. On the most recent testing date, we performed a reporting unit involves a number of assumptionsqualitative assessment and estimates. We use a combination ofdetermined that it was more likely than not that the fair value measurements to estimate enterprise values of our reporting units including: internal discounted cash flow analyses (income approach),retail trade names exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included trade name financial performance, general macroeconomic, industry, and comparable publicly traded company values (market approach). The income approach involves estimates of future performance that reflect assumptions regarding, among other things, forward natural gasmarket conditions, customer attrition and electricity prices, market heat rates, the effects of environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and retail sales volume trends, as well as determination of a terminal value. Another key variable in the income approach is the discount rate, or weighted average cost of capital, applied to the forecasted cash flows. The determination of the discount rate takes into consideration the capital structure, credit ratings and current debt yields of comparable publicly traded companies as well as an estimate of return on equity that reflects historical market returns and current market volatility for the industry. The market approach involves using trading multiples of EBITDA of those selected publicly traded companies to derive appropriate multiples to apply to the EBITDA of our reporting units. Critical judgments include the selection of publicly traded comparable companies and the weighting of the value metrics in developing the best estimate of enterprise value.interest rates.


64

RESULTS OF OPERATIONSOperations

Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra Consolidated Financial Results — Year Ended December 31, 2020 Comparedcommon stock increased $2.6 billion to Year Ended December 31, 2019 and Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

Year Ended December 31,2020 vs 2019
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
2019 vs 2018
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
202020192018
Operating revenues$11,443 $11,809 $9,144 $(366)$2,665 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,174)(5,742)(5,036)568 (706)
Operating costs(1,622)(1,530)(1,297)(92)(233)
Depreciation and amortization(1,737)(1,640)(1,394)(97)(246)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1,035)(904)(926)(131)22 
Impairment of long-lived assets(356)— — (356)— 
Operating income1,519 1,993 491 (474)1,502 
Other income34 56 47 (22)
Other deductions(42)(15)(5)(27)(10)
Interest expense and related charges(630)(797)(572)167 (225)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(37)(79)42 42 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment16 17 (12)(1)
Income (loss) before income taxes890 1,216 (101)(326)1,317 
Income tax (expense) benefit(266)(290)45 24 (335)
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)$(302)$982 


Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $$(4,895)$11,443 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(6,857)(1,078)(1,262)(168)(704)— 4,895 (5,174)
Operating costs(123)(727)(270)(30)(408)(63)(1)(1,622)
Depreciation and amortization(303)(475)(721)(19)(133)(22)(64)(1,737)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(675)(75)(89)(26)(71)(27)(72)(1,035)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (356)— — (356)
Operating income (loss)312 1,761 73 39 (420)(109)(137)1,519 
Other income10 34 
Other deductions(12)(30)— (2)(1)(42)
Interest expense and related charges(10)(7)10 (2)— (629)(630)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — — — — — 
Income (loss) before income taxes309 1,760 41 50 (414)(101)(755)890 
Income tax expense— — — — — — (266)(266)
Net income (loss)$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$624 

65


Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$6,872 $3,836 $2,790 $338 $1,602 $341 $(3,970)$11,809 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,816)(1,283)(1,393)(187)(767)(267)3,971 (5,742)
Operating costs(71)(691)(236)(27)(366)(138)(1)(1,530)
Depreciation and amortization(292)(472)(680)(19)(120)— (57)(1,640)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(538)(76)(83)(17)(78)(43)(69)(904)
Operating income (loss)155 1,314 398 88 271 (107)(126)1,993 
Other income— 28 — — 18 56 
Other deductions— (8)(1)— — (5)(1)(15)
Interest expense and related charges(21)(13)— (4)— (767)(797)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (37)(37)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — 16 — — — — 16 
Income (loss) before income taxes134 1,342 400 88 274 (109)(913)1,216 
Income tax expense—��— — — — — (290)(290)
Net income (loss)$134 $1,342 $400 $88 $274 $(109)$(1,203)$926 


Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$5,597 $2,497 $1,895 $208 $1,183 $371 $(2,607)$9,144 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(4,126)(1,461)(1,131)(134)(505)(286)2,607 (5,036)
Operating costs(39)(661)(164)(17)(305)(109)(2)(1,297)
Depreciation and amortization(318)(390)(519)(14)(81)— (72)(1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(424)(88)(71)(8)(50)(39)(246)(926)
Operating income (loss)690 (103)10 35 242 (63)(320)491 
Other income29 34 — — (19)47 
Other deductions— (7)(1)— (1)(5)
Interest expense and related charges(7)(12)(10)(1)(1)— (541)(572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (79)(79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment— — 18 — — — (1)17 
Income (loss) before income taxes712 (88)18 34 242 (62)(957)(101)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — 45 45 
Net income (loss)$712 $(88)$18 $34 $242 $(62)$(912)$(56)

66

In 2020, our operating segments delivered strong operating performance with a disciplined focus on cost management, while generating and selling essential electricity in a safe and reliable manner during a period of significant economic disruption. Our performance reflected the stability of our integrated model, including a diversified generation fleet, retail and commercial and hedging activities in support of our integrated business, to produce results that exceeded expectations and generated significant cash from operations of $3.337$1.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase2023 from a loss of 22% versus 2019 was particularly strong given the general uncertainty in the overall economy and the challenges of dealing with COVID-19.

Consolidated results decreased $302 million to net income of $624 million in$1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to2022. For additional information see the year ended December 31, 2019. The change in results was driven by a $465 million pre-tax decrease in unrealized gains on commodity hedging transactions, a $356 million pre-tax impairment of assets related to our Kincaid, Zimmer and Joppa/EEI coal generation facilities and a $29 million pre-tax loss on disposalfollowing discussion of our equity method investment in NELP, offset by strong operating results particularly in the Texas segment, and the addition of Crius and Ambit. See Note 21 to the Financial Statements.operations.

Operating costs increased $92 million to $1.622 billion in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily driven by higher estimated costs for ARO, increased LTSA costsEBITDA and COVID-related expenses and increased operating costs in Retail driven by the acquisition of Ambit and Crius, partially offset by lower property taxes.

SG&A expense increased $131 million to $1.035 billion in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to the increased expense resulting from the acquisition of Crius in July 2019 and Ambit in November 2019.

Interest expense and related charges decreased $167 million to $630 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 driven by a $109 million decrease in interest paid/accrued reflecting the reduction in higher interest Vistra senior unsecured notes through the Redemptions and Tender Offers in 2019 and 2020 and a $65 million decrease in unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps. Debt extinguishment gains totaled $17 million and $21 million in the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 21 to the Financial Statements.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the impacts of the TRA totaled income of $5 million and expense of $37 million, respectively. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the impacts of the TRA obligation.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, income tax expense totaled $266 million and the effective tax rate was 29.9%. For the year ended December 31, 2019, income tax benefit totaled $290 million and the effective tax rate was 23.8%. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for reconciliation of the effective rates to the U.S. federal statutory rate.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, consolidated cash flows from operations totaled $3.337 billion and $2.736 billion, respectively.


Discussion of Adjusted EBITDA

Non-GAAP MeasuresIn analyzing and planning for our business, we supplement our use of GAAP financial measures with non-GAAP financial measures, including EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as performance measures. These non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of our business that, when viewed (i) with our GAAP results and (ii) the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures included in the tables below, may provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting our business. Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that management uses to allocate resources, determine our ability to fund capital expenditures, assess performance against our peers, and evaluate overall financial performance, we believe they provide useful information for investors.

59

These non-GAAP financial measures should not be relied upon to the exclusion of GAAP financial measures and are, by definition, an incomplete understanding of Vistra and must be considered in conjunction with GAAP measures. In addition, non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized; therefore, it may not be possible to compare these financial measures with other companies' non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. We strongly encourage investors to review our consolidated financial statements and publicly filed reports in their entirety and not rely on any single financial measure.

67

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDAWe believe EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provide meaningful representations of our operating performance. We consider EBITDA as another way to measure financial performance on an ongoing basis. Adjusted EBITDA is meant to reflect the operating performance of our segments for the period presented. We define EBITDA as earnings (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit) and depreciation and amortization expense. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted to exclude (i) gains or losses on the sale or retirement of certain assets, (ii) the impacts of mark-to-market changes on derivatives, (iii) the impact of impairment charges, (iv) certain amounts associated with fresh-start reporting, acquisitions, dispositions, transition costs or restructurings, (v) non-cash compensation expense, (vi) impacts from the Tax Receivable Agreement and (vii) other material nonrecurring or unusual items.

Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are financial measures that management uses to allocate resources, determine our ability to fund capital expenditures, assess performance against our peers, and evaluate overall financial performance, we believe they provide useful information for investors.

When EBITDA or Adjusted EBITDA is discussed in reference to performance on a consolidated basis, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is Net income (loss).

Adjusted EBITDAVistra Consolidated Financial Results — Year Ended December 31, 20202023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019 and Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20182022

Year Ended December 31,2020 vs 2019
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
2019 vs 2018
Favorable (Unfavorable)
$ Change
202020192018
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)$(302)$982 
Income tax expense (benefit)266 290 (45)(24)335 
Interest expense and related charges (a)630 797 572 (167)225 
Depreciation and amortization (b)1,812 1,713 1,472 99 241 
EBITDA3,332 3,726 1,943 (394)1,783 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(231)(696)380 465 (1,076)
Generation plant retirement expenses43 54 — (11)54 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts38 30 41 (11)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(5)37 79 (42)(42)
Non-cash compensation expenses63 48 73 15 (25)
Transition and merger expenses16 115 233 (99)(118)
Impairment of long-lived assets356 — — 356 — 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP29 — — 29 — 
COVID-19-related expenses (c)25 — — 25 — 
Odessa earnout buybacks— — 18 — (18)
Other, net19 11 (7)18 
Adjusted EBITDA$3,685 $3,325 $2,760 $360 $565 
____________
(a)Includes unrealized mark-to-marketThe following table presents net losses on interest rate swaps of $155 million, $220 millionincome (loss), EBITDA and $5 millionadjusted EBITDA for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.2023:
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization in the Texas segment of $75 million, $73 million and $78 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(c)Includes material and supplies and other incremental costs related to our COVID-19 response.

Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$10,572 $3,823 $4,215 $914 $1,831 $— $(6,576)$14,779 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(9,046)(1,951)(2,031)(328)(776)(3)6,578 (7,557)
Operating costs(123)(894)(297)(58)(254)(74)(2)(1,702)
Depreciation and amortization(102)(544)(647)(79)(62)— (68)(1,502)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(858)(134)(82)(24)(51)(34)(125)(1,308)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (49)— — (49)
Operating income (loss)443 300 1,158 425 639 (111)(193)2,661 
Other income35 21 110 86 257 
Other deductions— (2)— — (5)— (7)(14)
Interest expense and related charges(20)21 — (2)(5)(742)(740)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (164)(164)
Income (loss) before income taxes424 354 1,161 454 633 (6)(1,020)2,000 
Income tax expense— — (1)— — — (507)(508)
Net income (loss)$424 $354 $1,160 $454 $633 $(6)$(1,527)$1,492 
6860

Vistra recorded its strongest performance in 2020 with Adjusted EBITDA of $3.685 billion, up nearly 11% versus 2019, despite economic challenges and uncertainties dealing with COVID-19. This performance exceeded our expectations set prior to the onset of the pandemic. Our balanced business was driven by strong performance in our Retail segment, delivering $983 million of Adjusted EBITDA, and our Texas generation segment, which delivered $1.646 billion of Adjusted EBITDA. Our other segments, including East, West, Sunset, Asset Closure and Corp delivered $1.056 billion. The performance of our Retail business on a variety of metrics, including customer satisfaction, customer count and margin are all strong. In Generation, we exceeded our commercial availability and safety targets. Our people drove strong results through our Operations Performance Initiative driving incremental gross margin and cost reduction opportunities, and our Best Defense safety program. Finally, our Commercial team optimized our integrated operations through disciplined risk management and hedging activities to ensure we lock in value for our generation business, while cost effectively supplying our retail business. This strong collaboration among our segments has produced consistent, strong results in each year since Vistra became a public company in 2016.


Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated
Net income (loss)$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$624 
Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Income tax expenseIncome tax expense— — — — — — 266 266 
Interest expense and related charges (a)Interest expense and related charges (a)10 (8)(10)— 629 630 
Depreciation and amortization (b)Depreciation and amortization (b)303 550 721 19 133 22 64 1,812 
EBITDA622 2,302 769 59 (279)(79)(62)3,332 
EBITDA before Adjustments
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactionsUnrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions340 (691)15 10 95 — — (231)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — — 43 — — 43 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts(8)22 — 19 — — 38 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — (5)(5)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (c)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (c)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (c)
Non-cash compensation expenses
Non-cash compensation expenses
Non-cash compensation expensesNon-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 63 63 
Transition and merger expensesTransition and merger expenses— — (3)11 16 
Impairment of long-lived assetsImpairment of long-lived assets— — — — 356 — — 356 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP— — 29 — — — — 29 
COVID-19-related expenses (c)— 15 — — 25 
PJM capacity performance default impacts (d)
PJM capacity performance default impacts (d)
PJM capacity performance default impacts (d)
Winter Storm Uri impacts (e)
Other, netOther, net11 26 10 (36)19 
Adjusted EBITDAAdjusted EBITDA$983 $1,646 $849 $73 $242 $(81)$(27)$3,685 
____________
(a)Includes $155$36 million of unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $75$91 million in the Texas segment.
(c)Includes material$29 million gain recognized on the repurchase of TRA Rights in December 2023 (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements).
(d)Represents estimate of anticipated market participant defaults or settlements on initial PJM capacity performance penalties due to extreme magnitude of penalties associated with Winter Storm Elliott.
(e)Includes the application of bill credits. The Company incentivized certain large commercial and suppliesindustrial customers to curtail their usage during Winter Storm Uri by providing bill credits for use in future periods. The Company believes the inclusion of the bill credits as a reduction to Adjusted EBITDA in the years in which such bill credits are applied more accurately reflects its operating performance. We estimate remaining bill credit amounts to be applied in future periods for 2024 (approximately $11 million) and other incremental costs related to our COVID-19 response.2025 (approximately $26 million).

The following table presents net income (loss), EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2022:

Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Operating revenues$9,455 $3,733 $3,706 $336 $868 $384 $(4,754)$13,728 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(7,169)(2,968)(3,546)(481)(670)(322)4,755 (10,401)
Operating costs(143)(808)(255)(42)(251)(145)(1)(1,645)
Depreciation and amortization(145)(537)(706)(42)(66)(31)(69)(1,596)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(826)(131)(66)(21)(35)(44)(66)(1,189)
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — (74)— — (74)
Operating income (loss)1,172 (711)(867)(250)(228)(158)(135)(1,177)
69
61


Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated

Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra Consolidated
Other income
Other deductions
Interest expense and related charges
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income tax benefit
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)$134 $1,342 $400 $88 $274 $(109)$(1,203)$926 
Income tax expense— — — — — — 290 290 
Income tax benefit
Interest expense and related charges (a)Interest expense and related charges (a)21 (8)13 — — 767 797 
Depreciation and amortization (b)Depreciation and amortization (b)292 545 680 19 120 — 57 1,713 
EBITDA447 1,879 1,093 107 398 (109)(89)3,726 
EBITDA before Adjustments
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactionsUnrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions278 (591)(196)(41)(146)— — (696)
Generation plant retirement expensesGeneration plant retirement expenses— — — — 12 42 — 54 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impactsFresh start/purchase accounting impacts23 (4)(4)14 (3)— 30 
Impacts of Tax Receivable AgreementImpacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 37 37 
Non-cash compensation expensesNon-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 48 48 
Non-cash compensation expenses
Non-cash compensation expenses
Transition and merger expensesTransition and merger expenses49 11 22 — 23 115 
Impairment of long-lived assets
Winter Storm Uri (c)
Winter Storm Uri (c)
Winter Storm Uri (c)
Other, netOther, net10 12 15 — (36)11 
Adjusted EBITDAAdjusted EBITDA$807 $1,307 $925 $63 $308 $(68)$(17)$3,325 
____________
(a)Includes $220$250 million of unrealized mark-to-market net lossesgains on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $73$86 million in the Texas segment.

(c)
Adjusted EBITDA impacts of Winter Storm Uri reflects $183 million related to a reduction in the allocation of ERCOT default uplift charges which were expected to be paid over several decades under protocols existing at the time of the storm and $144 million related to the application of bill credits to large commercial and industrial customers that curtailed their usage during Winter Storm Uri. The adjustment for ERCOT default uplift charges relates to (i) ERCOT receiving payments that reduced the market wide default balance and (ii) the fourth quarter 2022 derecognition of the remaining default balance in connection with a settlement between Brazos and ERCOT.

Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset
Closure
Eliminations / Corporate and OtherVistra
Consolidated
Net income (loss)$712 $(88)$18 $34 $242 $(62)$(912)$(56)
Income tax benefit— — — — — — (45)(45)
Interest expense and related charges (a)12 10 (1)— 543 572 
Depreciation and amortization (b)318 468 519 14 81 — 72 1,472 
EBITDA1,037 392 547 47 324 (62)(342)1,943 
Unrealized net (gain) loss resulting from commodity hedging transactions(206)498 81 15 (8)— — 380 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts26 (4)11 — — 41 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement— — — — — — 79 79 
Non-cash compensation expenses— — — — — — 73 73 
Transition and merger expenses16 195 233 
Odessa earnout buybacks— 18 — — — — — 18 
Other, net(13)(1)25 (4)(25)(7)
Adjusted EBITDA$845 $912 $680 $65 $341 $(63)$(20)$2,760 
____________
(a)Includes $5Operating income increased $3.838 billion to $2.661 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022. Results for the year ended December 31, 2023 were favorably impacted by $490 million ofin pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market netgains on derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving down in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to $2.510 billion in pre-tax unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps.
(b)Includes nuclear fuel amortization of $78 millioncommodity derivative positions due to power and natural gas forward market curves moving up materially in the Texas segment.year ended December 31, 2022. See further information on our derivative results in

Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities
below.
7062

Table of Contents
Retail Segment Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019

Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
20202019
Operating revenues:
Revenues in ERCOT$5,880 $5,061 $819 
Revenues in Northeast/Midwest2,406 1,818 588 
Amortization expense(5)(15)10 
Other revenues(11)(19)
Total operating revenues$8,270 $6,872 $1,398 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Purchases from affiliates(4,566)(3,571)(995)
Unrealized net losses on hedging activities with affiliates(329)(305)(24)
Unrealized net gains on hedging activities— 19 (19)
Delivery fees(1,893)(1,629)(264)
Other costs (a)(69)(330)261 
Total fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees$(6,857)$(5,816)$(1,041)
Net income$309 $134 $175 
Adjusted EBITDA$983 $807 $176 
Retail sales volumes (GWh):
Retail electricity sales volumes:
Sales volumes in ERCOT54,075 47,345 6,730 
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest36,274 30,255 6,019 
Total retail electricity sales volumes90,349 77,600 12,749 
Weather (North Texas average) - percent of normal (b):
Cooling degree days90.0 %96.0 %
Heating degree days91.0 %113.0 %
____________
(a)ForOperating results for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, includes third-party fuel and power purchases of $69 million and $329 million, respectively.
(b)Weather data is obtained from Weatherbank, Inc. For the year ended December 31, 2020, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from December 2010 to December 2019. For the year ended December 31, 2019, normal is defined as the average over the 10-year period from December 2009 to December 2018.

Net income increased by $175 million to $309 million and Adjusted EBITDA increased by $176 million to $983 million in the year ended December 31, 20202023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to 2019
Margin primarily driven by the addition of Crius acquired in July 2019 and Ambit acquired in November 2019$339 
Other driven by higher operating costs and SG&A expense (including bad debt expense) primarily due to the addition of Crius and Ambit(162)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$177
Change in depreciation and amortization expenses driven by Crius/Ambit intangibles(11)
(Unfavorable) impact of higher unrealized net losses on commodity hedging activities(62)
Lower transition and merger and other expenses71 
Change in Net income$175
2022 were favorably impacted by strong plant operating performance allowing us to realize the value created by our comprehensive hedging strategy, partially offset by lower than expected retail sales volumes due to unfavorable weather. The following table presents operational performance of our retail and generation segments.

71

Year Ended December 31,
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
2023202220232022202320222023202220232022
Retail sales volumes (GWh):
Retail electricity sales volumes:
Sales volumes in ERCOT70,27565,207
Sales volumes in Northeast/Midwest27,14732,882
Total retail electricity sales volumes97,42298,089
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities41,84934,78460,50254,5695,4625,134
Lignite and coal facilities23,89925,21116,57221,824
Nuclear facilities18,89319,688
Solar facilities781822
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities55.1 %48.8 %62.2 %57.2 %61.0 %57.1 %
Lignite and coal facilities70.9 %74.8 %41.3 %54.4 %
Nuclear facilities89.9 %93.6 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days115 %111 %112 %109 %90 %107 %79 %107 %112 %113 %
Heating degree days85 %108 %88 %123 %87 %99 %125 %109 %86 %99 %
Table of Contents____________
Generation Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2019

Year Ended December 31,
TexasEastWestSunset
20202019202020192020201920202019
Operating revenues:
Electricity sales$896 $1,048 $833 $1,355 $289 $293 $883 $969 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO— — (52)170 — — 164 197 
Sales to affiliates2,543 2,213 1,655 1,074 — 365 285 
Rolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current period371 159 59 (22)(10)(205)(74)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities217 72 (121)(44)12 51 133 249 
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities with affiliates458 132 (61)180 — — (68)(7)
Other revenues— — (4)— (20)(17)
Operating revenues4,116 3,836 2,415 2,790 282 338 1,252 1,602 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(960)(1,117)(1,225)(1,381)(166)(187)(744)(739)
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs from affiliates— (8)(2)— — 
Unrealized (gains) losses from hedging activities14 16 — — 45 (22)
Ancillary and other costs(138)(182)(37)(11)(2)— (7)(8)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(1,078)(1,283)(1,262)(1,393)(168)(187)(704)(767)
Net income (loss)$1,760 $1,342 $41 $400 $50 $88 $(414)$274 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,646 $1,307 $849 $925 $73 $63 $242 $308 
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities35,093 39,433 55,938 55,555 5,284 5,228 
Lignite and coal facilities26,013 24,558 29,971 34,424 
Nuclear facilities19,480 19,305 
Solar/Battery facilities432 439 
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities49.2 %55.0 %57.9 %58.4 %59.1 %58.5 %
Lignite and coal facilities77.1 %72.8 %47.1 %54.1 %
Nuclear facilities96.7 %95.8 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days98 %99 %105 %103 %130 %104 %102 %110 %
Heating degree days85 %111 %92 %101 %95 %105 %89 %99 %
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree days or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data.


72

Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2020201920202019
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
20232023202220232022
Market pricingMarket pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$21.46 $35.93 PJM West Hub$24.55 $30.87 
AEP Dayton Hub$24.49 $31.02 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$1.99 $2.51 NYISO Zone C$19.37 $25.90 
Massachusetts Hub$26.57 $34.89 
Average natural gas price (a):Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$26.77 $31.23 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$1.59 $2.39 Northern Illinois Hub$22.47 $28.16 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$2.00 $3.17 
____________
(a)Reflects the average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us.
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized.

63

Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2023, other income totaled $257 million driven by a gain of $89 million from the sale of property in Freestone County, Texas recorded in the Asset Closure Segment and $86 million in interest income due to holding a material cash balance anticipating the Energy Harbor transaction closing. For the year ended December 31, 2022, other income totaled $117 million driven by insurance proceeds of $70 million which primarily consists of business interruption claim proceeds recorded in the Texas segment. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The increase in consolidated interest expense and related charges of $372 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, is primarily due to (a) unrealized mark-to-market losses on interest rate swaps of $36 million in 2023 compared to unrealized mark-to-market gains on interest rate swaps of $250 million in 2022 due to less volatility in interest rates in the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, (b) an increase in interest paid/accrued of $63 million driven by higher effective interest rates in 2023 and (c) $21 million of commitment fees related to the Commitment Letter in the year ended December 31, 2023. See Note 22 to the Financial Statements.

The following table presents additional changes into net income (loss) and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 20202023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Year Ended December 31, 2020 Compared to 2019
TexasEastWestSunset
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in revenue net of fuel$390 $(35)$18 $(39)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in other operating costs(20)(15)(3)(4)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in SG&A expenses(7)(7)(6)(22)
Other(24)(19)(1)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$339 $(76)$10 $(66)
Unfavorable change in depreciation and amortization(5)(41)— (13)
Change in unrealized net gains/(losses) on commodity hedging activities100 (211)(51)(241)
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts(18)(4)(5)
Transition and merger expenses22 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — (356)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — (31)
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP— (29)— — 
Other (including interest and COVID-19 related expenses)(29)
Change in Net income$418 $(359)$(38)$(688)
Year Ended December 31, 2023 Compared to 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunset
Favorable change in realized revenue net of fuel driven by effectiveness of comprehensive hedging$— $483 $153 $113 $357 
Higher margins driven by increase in customers and interyear timing of power supply costs290 — — — — 
Winter Storm Uri bill credit runoff92 — — — — 
Impacts of mild weather in 2023(160)— — — — 
Change in operating costs due primarily to change in generation volumes— (86)(40)(17)
Change in SG&A and other(40)(65)(14)15 (42)
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$182 $332 $99 $111 $316 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in depreciation and amortization43 (12)59 (37)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities(877)811 1,876 618 555 
Impairment of long-lived assets— — — — 25 
PJM capacity performance default impacts— — (3)— (6)
Winter Storm Uri impact (ERCOT default uplift)(89)(182)— — — 
Other (including interest expenses)20 (3)— (31)
Change in Net income$(734)$969 $2,028 $692 $863 

The change in Texas segmentTo supplement the amounts and explanations noted above, primary drivers of results was driven by higher realized prices through hedging activities and plant optimization efforts and unrealized hedging gains, partially offset by lower insurance reimbursement and COVID-19 related expenses in the current year.

The change in East segment results was driven by lower capacity revenue, unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, loss on disposal of equity method investment in NELP for 100% ownership of NJEA (see Note 21 to the Financial Statements) and COVID-19 related expenses in the current year.

The change in West segment results was driven by unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, partially offset by higher realized prices through hedging activities and plant optimization efforts.

The change in Sunset segment results was driven by impairment of assets related to our Kincaid, Zimmer and Joppa/EEI coal generation facilities and related generation plant retirement expenses, unrealized hedging losses in current year versus unrealized hedging gains in prior year, lower capacity revenue, and higher operating costs.

73

Table of Contents
Generation Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2018

Year Ended December 31,
TexasEastWestSunset
20192018201920182019201820192018
Operating revenues:
Electricity sales$1,048 $1,162 $1,355 $990 $293 $193 $969 $769 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO— — 170 375 — 30 197 258 
Sales to affiliates2,213 1,819 1,074 614 — — 285 168 
Rolloff of unrealized net gains (losses) representing positions settled in the current period371 404 59 (10)20 (74)60 
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities72 (689)(44)(43)51 (35)249 (87)
Unrealized net gains (losses) on hedging activities with affiliates132 (198)180 (36)— — (7)16 
Other revenues— (1)(4)(8)— (17)(1)
Operating revenues3,836 2,497 2,790 1,895 338 208 1,602 1,183 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees:
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs(1,117)(1,307)(1,381)(1,111)(187)(132)(739)(547)
Fuel for generation facilities and purchased power costs from affiliates— — (2)(8)— — 30 
Unrealized (gains) losses from hedging activities16 (15)(5)— — (22)19 
Ancillary and other costs(182)(139)(11)(7)— (2)(8)(7)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(1,283)(1,461)(1,393)(1,131)(187)(134)(767)(505)
Net income (loss)$1,342 $(88)$400 $18 $88 $34 $274 $242 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,307 $912 $925 $680 $63 $65 $308 $341 
Production volumes (GWh):
Natural gas facilities39,433 35,790 55,555 41,036 5,228 3,664 
Lignite and coal facilities24,558 26,243 34,424 29,734 
Nuclear facilities19,305 20,416 
Solar/Battery facilities439 344 
Capacity factors:
CCGT facilities55.0 %58.8 %58.4 %59.1 %58.5 %56.1 %
Lignite and coal facilities72.8 %77.8 %54.1 %63.4 %
Nuclear facilities95.8 %101.3 %
Weather - percent of normal (a):
Cooling degree days99 %100 %103 %120 %105 %105 %110 %134 %
Heating degree days111 %113 %101 %103 %105 %86 %99 %97 %
____________
(a)Reflects cooling degree days or heating degree days for the region based on Weather Services International (WSI) data.


74

Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019201820192018
Market pricingAverage Market On-Peak Power Prices ($MWh) (b):
Average ERCOT North power price ($/MWh)$35.93 $29.96 PJM West Hub$30.87 $41.79 
AEP Dayton Hub$31.02 $40.47 
Average NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas price ($/MMBtu)$2.51 $3.12 NYISO Zone C$25.90 $37.03 
Massachusetts Hub$34.89 $50.11 
Average natural gas price (a):Indiana Hub$31.23 $39.01 
TetcoM3 ($/MMBtu)$2.39 $3.69 Northern Illinois Hub$28.16 $34.46 
Algonquin Citygates ($/MMBtu)$3.17 $4.84 
____________
(a)Reflects the average of daily quoted prices for the periods presented and does not reflect costs incurred by us.
(b)Reflects the average of day-ahead quoted prices for the periods presented and does not necessarily reflect prices we realized.

The following table presents changes in net income and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 20192023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018.
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to 2018
TexasEastWestSunset
Favorable impact related to operations acquired in the Merger (a)$— $268 $20 $84 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in revenue net of fuel421 10 (11)(159)
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in other operating costs(28)(13)(4)41 
Favorable/(unfavorable) change in SG&A expenses(11)(7)
Other(7)(9)— — 
Change in Adjusted EBITDA$395 $245 $(2)$(33)
Unfavorable change in depreciation and amortization(77)(161)(5)(39)
Change in unrealized net gains on commodity hedging activities1,089 277 56 138 
Fresh start/purchase accounting impacts— (7)
Transition and merger expenses(2)— (13)
Generation plant retirement expenses— — — (12)
Impact of Odessa earnout buybacks18 — — — 
Other (including interest)(2)
Change in Net income$1,430 $382 $54 $32 
2022 include:

The change in Texas segment results was driven by higher realized prices throughComprehensive hedging activitiesstrategy. See Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and plant optimization efforts, unrealized gains in 2019 versus unrealized losses in 2018, insurance reimbursement received in 2019, and the Odessa earnout buybacks in 2018.Mark-to-Market Activities below.

The changeWinter Storm Uri impacts. 2022 GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results continued to be materially impacted by Winter Storm Uri. In 2022, a $189 million default uplift liability to ERCOT was extinguished and resulted in East segment resultsnet income during the year, but had no impact on Adjusted EBITDA in 2022 as the initial liability incurred in 2021 was driven by operations in the first quarter of 2019 acquired in the Merger, partially offset by lower generation in the second through fourth quarters.excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.

The changeSG&A expenses and other. 2023 is unfavorable compared to 2022 driven primarily by higher incentive compensation in West segment results was driven by operations2023 and insurance recoveries recorded in the first quarter of 2019 acquiredTexas in the Merger and unrealized hedging gains in 2019 versus unrealized hedging losses in 2018.2022.

The change in Sunset segment results was driven by operations in the first quarter of 2019 acquired in the Merger and unrealized hedging gains in 2019, partially offset by decrease in revenue net of fuel reflecting lower realized power prices and capacity revenue.
7564

Table of Contents
Asset Closure Segment Year Ended December 31, 20202023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20192022

Year Ended December 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
Change
20202019
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2023
2023
2023
Operating revenues
Operating revenues
Operating revenuesOperating revenues$$341 $(338)
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery feesFuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees— (267)267 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees
Operating costs
Operating costs
Operating costsOperating costs(63)(138)75 
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization(22)— (22)
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expensesSelling, general and administrative expenses(27)(43)16 
Operating lossOperating loss(109)(107)(2)
Operating loss
Operating loss
Other income
Other income
Other incomeOther income10 
Other deductionsOther deductions(2)(5)
Other deductions
Other deductions
Interest expense and related charges
Interest expense and related charges
Interest expense and related charges
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income (loss) before income taxes
Income (loss) before income taxes
Net loss
Net loss
Net lossNet loss$(101)$(109)$8 
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDAAdjusted EBITDA$(81)$(68)$(13)
Production volumes (GWh)Production volumes (GWh)— 7,484 (7,484)
Production volumes (GWh)
Production volumes (GWh)

ResultsFor the year ended December 31, 2022, results and volumes for the Asset Closure segment primarily reflect the retirementinclude those from Edwards generation plant that we retired on January 1, 2023 and include unrealized hedging gains related to coal and power derivatives of the Coffeen, Duck Creek, Havana and Hennepin plants in November and December 2019, respectively, the retirement of the Northeastern waste coal plant in October 2018, retirement of the Stuart and Killen plants in May 2018 (acquired in the Merger), and the retirement of the Monticello, Sandow and Big Brown plants in January and February 2018, respectively (see Note 4 to the Financial Statements).$19 million. Operating costs for the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019 included2022 also include ongoing costs associated with the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA results for 2023 are favorable to 2022 primarily due to the $89 million gain on sale of land in Freestone County, Texas.

Energy-Related Commodity Contracts and Mark-to-Market Activities

As forward power prices materially increased in 2022, our generation segments (Texas, East, West and Sunset) aggressively sold forward power for 2023 and future years. While settled power prices in 2023 are lower than 2022, the strategic hedging allowed us to lock in margins for 2023 which resulted in realized revenue net of fuel above what we were able to recognize in 2022 (were mostly hedged going into 2022 so did not recognize the full benefit of settled prices). The forward power sales are also the drivers of the changes in unrealized gains/losses on hedging activities. As power prices increase/decrease in comparison to what our generation segments have sold forward, the generation segments recognize unrealized losses/gains. The retail segment procures power from the generation segments to serve future load obligations and thus changes in forward power prices have an inverse effect on unrealized mark to market for the retail segment as compared to the generation segments. This is evident in 2022 as material increase in forward power prices drove material unrealized losses in our generation segment, partially offset by unrealized gains in our retail segment. In 2023, forward power prices decreased slightly which resulted in unrealized gains in our generation segments which is partially offset by unrealized losses in our retail segment.

65

Table of Contents
The table below summarizes the changes in commodity contract assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019.2022. The net change in these assets and liabilities, excluding "other activity" as described below, reflects $231 million and $696$490 million in unrealized net gains and $2.51 billion in unrealized net losses for the yearyears ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively, arising from mark-to-market accounting for positions in the commodity contract portfolio.
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2023
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of period
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of period
Commodity contract net liability at beginning of periodCommodity contract net liability at beginning of period$(279)$(850)
Settlements/termination of positions (a)Settlements/termination of positions (a)(14)358 
Settlements/termination of positions (a)
Settlements/termination of positions (a)
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)245 338 
Acquired commodity contracts (c)— (28)
Other activity (d)(27)(97)
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)
Changes in fair value of positions in the portfolio (b)
Other activity (c)
Other activity (c)
Other activity (c)
Commodity contract net liability at end of periodCommodity contract net liability at end of period$(75)$(279)
Commodity contract net liability at end of period
Commodity contract net liability at end of period
____________
(a)Represents reversals of previously recognized unrealized gains and losses upon settlement/termination (offsets realized gains and lossesgains/(losses) recognized in the settlement period). The years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include reversals of $1 million of previously recorded unrealized losses and $3 million of previously recorded unrealized gains related to Vistra beginning balances. respectively. The years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 also include reversals of $12 million and $124 million, respectively, of previously recorded unrealized losses related to commodity contracts acquired in the Merger, Crius Transaction and Ambit Transaction. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(b)Represents unrealized net gains gains/(losses) recognized, reflecting the effect of changes in fair value. Excludes changes in fair value in the month the position settled as well as amounts related to positions entered into, and settled, in the same month.
(c)Includes fair value of commodity contracts acquired on the Ambit Acquisition Date and the Crius Acquisition Date in 2019 (see Note 2 to the Financial Statements).
(d)Represents changes in fair value of positions due to receipt or payment of cash not reflected in unrealized gains or losses. Amounts are generally related to premiums related to options purchased or sold as well as certain margin deposits classified as settlement for certain transactions executed on the CME.

76

Table of Contents
Maturity TableThe following maturity table presents the net commodity contract liability arising from recognition of fair values at December 31, 2020,2023, scheduled by the source of fair value and contractual settlement dates of the underlying positions.
Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2020
Source of fair valueLess than
1 year
1-3 years4-5 yearsExcess of
5 years
Total
Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2023Maturity dates of unrealized commodity contract net liability at December 31, 2023
Source of Fair ValueSource of Fair ValueLess than
1 year
1-3 years4-5 yearsExcess of
5 years
Total
Prices actively quotedPrices actively quoted$(41)$(80)$(5)$— $(126)
Prices provided by other external sourcesPrices provided by other external sources30 (2)— 29 
Prices based on modelsPrices based on models107 23 (43)(65)22 
TotalTotal$96 $(59)$(47)$(65)$(75)

We have engaged in natural gas hedging activities to mitigate the risk of higher or lower wholesale electricity prices that have corresponded to increases or declines in natural gas prices. When natural gas prices are elevated or depressed, we continue to seek opportunities to manage our wholesale power price exposure through hedging activities, including forward wholesale and retail electricity sales.

Estimated hedging levels for generation volumes in our Texas, East, West and Sunset segments as of December 31, 2023 were as follows:
FINANCIAL CONDITION
20242025
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation:
Texas96 %93 %
Sunset96 %58 %
Natural Gas Generation:
Texas89 %80 %
East99 %80 %
West100 %81 %

66

Table of Contents
Financial Condition

Cash Flows

Operating Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 20202023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20192022 Cash provided by operating activities totaled $3.337$5.453 billion and $2.736 billion$485 million in the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively. The favorable change of $601 million reflects$4.968 billion was primarily driven by (a) a decrease in net margin deposits (return of cash) of $1.899 billion in the strong operating performance of both the Texas and Retail segments. Additionally, theyear ended December 31, 2023 as compared to an increase in operatingnet margin deposits of $1.874 billion in the year ended December 31, 2022 related to commodity contracts which support our comprehensive hedging strategy, including the impacts of cash flows includes a lower increase in working capital, lower cash interest paidmargin deposits returned and increased income taxes received, partially offset byreplaced with amounts posted under an affiliate financing agreement (see Note 11 to the Financial Statements) and (b) an increase in cash from operating income exclusive of net margin deposits, posted with third-parties.partially offset by $544 million of securitization proceeds from ERCOT in the year ended December 31, 2022 (see Note 1 to the Financial Statements).

Depreciation and amortization — Depreciation and amortization expense reported as a reconciling adjustment in the consolidated statements of cash flows exceeds the amount reported in the consolidated statements of operations by $311$454 million, $236$451 million and $139$297 million for the yearyears ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively. The difference representedrepresents amortization of nuclear fuel, which is reported as fuel costs in the consolidated statements of operations consistent with industry practice, and amortization of intangible net assets and liabilities that are reported in various other consolidated statements of operations line items including operating revenues and fuel and purchased power costs and delivery fees.fees (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements).

Investing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 20202023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20192022 — Cash used in investing activities totaled $1,572 million$2.145 billion and $1.717$1.239 billion in the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively. Capital expenditures totaled $1.259 billion and $713The increase of $906 million was driven by (a) $543 million in higher net purchases of environmental allowances and (b) a $375 million increase in capital expenditures due primarily to continued development of our solar and energy storage generation facilities (see Note 3 to the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash usedFinancial Statements), partially offset by $37 million in investing activitieshigher proceeds from the sale of assets driven by our sale of property in Freestone County, Texas in the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 also reflected net purchases of environmental allowances of $339 million and $125 million, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in the year ended December 31, 2019 also reflected $880 million of net cash paid in the Crius and Ambit Transactions.2023.

Capital Expenditures — In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, capital expenditures consisted of:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
2023
2023
2023
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments
Capital expenditures, including LTSA prepaymentsCapital expenditures, including LTSA prepayments$770 $520 
Nuclear fuel purchasesNuclear fuel purchases88 89 
Nuclear fuel purchases
Nuclear fuel purchases
Growth and development expendituresGrowth and development expenditures401 104 
Capital expenditures1,259 $713 
Growth and development expenditures
Growth and development expenditures
Total capital expenditures
Total capital expenditures
Total capital expenditures
Net sales (purchases) of environmental allowances
Net sales (purchases) of environmental allowances
Net sales (purchases) of environmental allowances
Net sales of (investments in) nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Net sales of (investments in) nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Net sales of (investments in) nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
Other investing activity
Other investing activity
Other investing activity
Cash used in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities

7767

Table of Contents
Financing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, 20202023 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20192022 — Cash used in financing activities totaled $1.796 billion$294 million and $1.237 billion$80 million in the years ended December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively. The change$214 million increase in cash used was primarily driven by:

issuanceby (a) the net repayment of $5.7$1.075 billion in the year ended December 31, 2023 of short-term debt and accounts receivable financing amounts borrowed in the year ended December 31, 2022 driven by changes in collateral posting requirements and (b) $1.5 billion principal amount of Vistra Operationssenior secured notes issued in May 2022, partially offset by (1) $2.5 billion principal amount of senior secured and senior unsecured notes issued in 2019;September 2023 and December 2023, of which $750 million will be used to fund cash tender offers in January 2024, and (2) lower share repurchases in 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Increase (Decrease)
20232022
Share repurchases$(1,245)$(1,949)$704 
Issuances of senior notes2,498 1,498 1,000 
Other net long-term borrowings (repayments), including the forward capacity agreements(33)(251)218 
Net short-term borrowings (repayments)(650)650 (1,300)
Net borrowings (repayments) under the accounts receivable financing facilities(425)425 (850)
Dividends paid to common stockholders(313)(302)(11)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders(150)(151)
Other financing activity24 — 24 
Cash used in financing activities$(294)$(80)$(214)

Collateral Financing Agreement With Affiliate
redemption
On June 15, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into a facility agreement (Facility Agreement) with a Delaware trust formed by the Company that sold 450,000 pre-capitalized trust securities (P-Caps) redeemable May 17, 2028 for an initial purchase price of $747$450 million. The Trust is not consolidated by Vistra. The Trust invested the proceeds from the sale of the P-Caps in a portfolio of either (a) U.S. Treasury securities (Treasuries) or (b) Treasuries and/or principal and interest strips of Treasuries (Treasury Strips, and together with the Treasuries and cash denominated in U.S. dollars, the Eligible Assets). At the direction of Vistra Operations, the Eligible Assets held by the Trust will be (i) delivered to one or more designated subsidiaries of Vistra Operations in order to allow such subsidiaries to use the Eligible Assets to meet certain posting obligations with counterparties, and/or (ii) pledged as collateral support for a letter of credit program.

Under the Facility Agreement, Vistra Operations will have the right (Issuance Right), from time to time, to require the Trust to purchase from Vistra Operations up to $450 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding Vistra UnsecuredOperations' 7.233% senior secured notes due 2028 (7.233% Senior NotesSecured Notes) in 2020;
net repaymentsexchange for the delivery of $350 million in short-term borrowings underall or a portion of the Revolving Credit Facility in 2020 comparedTreasuries and Treasury Strips corresponding to $350 million in net short-term borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility in 2019;
net repaymentsportion of $150 million under the Receivables Facility in 2020 compared to net borrowings of $111 million in 2019; and
repayment of $100 million of term loans under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in 2020,issuance right exercised at such time.

partially offset by:As of December 31, 2023, all of the Eligible Assets were being utilized to meet a portion of our current and future collateral posting obligations.

cash tender offersThe Trust will terminate at any time prior to May 17, 2028 and early redemptionsdistribute the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes to purchase approximately $3.0 billionthe holders of senior unsecured notes assumed in the Merger in 2019;
repaymentP-Caps if its sole assets consist of approximately $3.1 billion of term loans under the7.233% Senior Secured Notes that Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in 2019;is no longer entitled to repurchase.

$656 million in cash paidSee Note 11 for share repurchases in in 2019; and
$186 million decrease in debt tender offer and otheradditional details of the collateral financing fees in 2020 compared to 2019.agreement with affiliate.

Debt Activity

We remain committed to a strong balance sheet and have continued to state our objective to reduce our consolidated net leverage. We also intend to maintain adequate liquidity and pursue opportunities to refinance our long-term debt to extend maturities.

68

Table of Contents
In May 2024 and July 2024, after taking into account the Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer settled in January 2024, $342 million of 4.875% Senior Secured Notes and $1.155 billion of 3.550% Senior Secured Notes, respectively, will reach maturity. We plan to fund these upcoming principal payments using a combination of cash on hand and new debt issuances. Increases in interest rates will likely result in increased borrowing costs.

See Note 10 to the Financial statementsStatements for details of the Receivables Facility and Repurchase Facility and Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for details of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, the Commodity-Linked Facility and other long-term debt.

Available Liquidity

The following table summarizes changes in available liquidity for the year ended December 31, 2020:2023:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019Change
Cash and cash equivalents$406 $300 $106 
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — Revolving Credit Facility1,988 1,426 562 
Vistra Operations — Alternate Letter of Credit Facility— 
Total available liquidity (a)$2,399 $1,726 $673 
December 31, 2023December 31, 2022Change
Cash and cash equivalents (a)$3,485 $455 $3,030 
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities — Revolving Credit Facility (b)1,213 1,236 (23)
Vistra Operations — Commodity-Linked Facility (c)1,101 808 293 
Total available liquidity (d)(e)$5,799 $2,499 $3,300 
____________
(a)See the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the Financial Statements and Cash Flows above for details of the increase in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2023. The increase includes proceeds from the issuance of $1.75 billion and $750 million principal amount of Vistra Operations senior secured and senior unsecured notes in September 2023 and December 2023, respectively. Proceeds from the September 2023 issuance are expected to be used, together with cash on hand, to fund the Transactions. Proceeds from the December 2023 issuance were used to settle the Senior Secured Notes Tender Offers in January 2024.
(b)The decrease in availability for the year ended December 31, 2023 was driven by a $73 million increase in letters of credit outstanding under the facility and the maturity of $200 million of commitments under the Non-Extended Revolving Credit Facility, partially offset by $250 million in net repayments of borrowings under the facility.
(c)As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the borrowing bases are less than the facility limits of $1.575 billion and $1.35 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, available capacity reflects the borrowing base of $1.101 billion and no cash borrowings. As of December 31, 2022, available capacity reflects the borrowing base of $1.208 billion less $400 million in cash borrowings.
(d)Excludes amounts available to be borrowed under the Receivables Facility and the Repurchase Facility, respectively. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for detail on our accountaccounts receivable financing.

(e)
The $673 million increase in available liquidity for the year ended December 31, 2020 was primarily driven by cash from operations, repayments of cash borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and a reduction ofExcludes any additional letters of credit outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility reflecting the issuance of $303 million of letters of creditthat may be issued under the Secured LOC Facilities, partially offset by $1.259 billion of capital expenditures (including LTSA prepayments, nuclear fuel and development and growth expenditures), $747 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Unsecured Senior Notes redeemed in 2020, $266 million in dividends paidFacilities. See Note 12 to stockholders, the maturity of a $250 million AlternateFinancial Statements for detail on our Secured LOC Facility and $100 million of term loans under the Vistra Operation Credit Facility repaid in March 2020.Facilities.

DuringWe expect to use cash on hand and borrowings under the winter storm Uri event, Vistra was required to post a significant amount of collateral, including to ERCOT, clearinghouses for natural gasReceivables Facility and power transactionsRepurchase Facility and other trading counterparties. Despite these posting requirements, Vistra has consistently maintained, and it continues to maintain, sufficient liquidity to conduct its operations in the ordinary course. As of February 25, 2021, Vistra had more than $1.5 billion of cash and availability under its revolving credit facility to meet any of its liquidity needs. In February 2021, we borrowed $600 million under the Revolving Credit Facilityfacilities to fund our general corporate needs, including posting requirements in connection with the expected impacts of winter storm Uri.

Based upon our current internal financial forecasts,approximately $3.1 billion cash necessary to close the Energy Harbor acquisition. In addition, we believe that we will have access to sufficient liquidity to fund our other anticipated cash requirements including those related to our capital allocation initiatives, through at least the next 12 months. Our operational cash flows tend to be seasonal and weighted toward the second half of the year.

Interest payments on long-term debt are expected to total approximately $744 million in 2024, $1.293 billion in 2025-2026, $955 million in 2027-2028 and $1.052 billion thereafter. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for details of our long-term debt maturities.

Our obligations under commodity purchase and services agreements, including capacity payments, nuclear fuel and natural gas take-or-pay contracts, coal contracts, business services and nuclear-related outsourcing and other purchase commitments, are expected to total approximately $2.615 billion in 2024, $2.192 billion in 2025-2026, $982 million in 2027-2028 and $437 million thereafter. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for maturities of lease liabilities and Note 14 to the Financial Statements for commitments related to long-term service and maintenance contracts.

78
69

Table of Contents
Capital Expenditures

Estimated 2024 capital expenditures and nuclear fuel purchases for 2021 are expected toas of December 31, 2023 total approximately $1.379$1.695 billion and include:

$575745 million for solar and energy storage development;
$727 million for investments in generation and mining facilities;
$108149 million for nuclear fuel purchases;
$9 million for information technology and other corporate investments; and
$68774 million for other growth and development expenditures.

Liquidity Effects of Commodity Hedging and Trading Activities

We have entered into commodity hedging and trading transactions that require us to post collateral if the forward price of the underlying commodity moves such that the hedging or trading instrument we hold has declined in value. We use cash, letters of credit, Eligible Assets (see Note 11 to the Financial Statements) and other forms of credit support to satisfy such collateral posting obligations. See Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.Facilities and the Commodity-Linked Facility.

Exchange cleared transactions typically require initial margin (i.e., the upfront cash and/or letter of credit posted to take into account the size and maturity of the positions and credit quality) in addition to variation margin (i.e., the daily cash margin posted to take into account changes in the value of the underlying commodity). The amount of initial margin required is generally defined by exchange rules. Clearing agents, however, typically have the right to request additional initial margin based on various factors, including market depth, volatility and credit quality, which may be in the form of cash, letters of credit, a guaranty or other forms as negotiated with the clearing agent. Cash collateral received from counterparties is either used for working capital and other business purposes, including reducing borrowings under credit facilities, or is required to be deposited in a separate account and restricted from being used for working capital and other corporate purposes. With respect to over-the-counter transactions, counterparties generally have the right to substitute letters of credit for such cash collateral. In such event, the cash collateral previously posted would be returned to such counterparties, which would reduce liquidity in the event the cash was not restricted.

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, we received or posted cash, and letters of credit and Eligible Assets for commodity hedging and trading activities as follows:

$257 million1.244 billion in cash and Eligible Assets has been posted with counterparties as compared to $202 million$3.137 billion posted atas of December 31, 2019;2022;
$3345 million in cash has been received from counterparties as compared to $8$39 million received atas of December 31, 2019;2022;
$878 million2.408 billion in letters of credit have been posted with counterparties as compared to $1.150$2.314 billion posted atas of December 31, 2019;2022; and
$18143 million in letters of credit have been received from counterparties as compared to $17$74 million received atas of December 31, 2019.2022.

See Collateral Support Obligations below for information related to collateral posted in accordance with the PUCT and ISO/RTO rules.

Income Tax Payments

In the next 12 months, we do not expect to make federal income tax payments due to Vistra's use of NOL carryforwards. We expect to make approximately $56$35 million in state income tax payments offset by $9$10 million in state tax refunds, and $3 million in TRA payments in the next 12 months.refunds.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we received refunds of $170 million related to AMT credits. For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, there were no federal income tax payments, $40$44 million in state income tax payments, $10$13 million in state income tax refunds and less than $1$9 million in TRA payments.

Capitalization

Our capitalization ratios consisted of 52%70% and 56%71% long-term debt (less amounts due currently) and 48%30% and 44%29% stockholders' equity at December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively. Total long-term debt (including amounts due currently) to capitalization was 53%73% and 57%71% at December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively.

7970

Table of Contents
Financial Covenants

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement and the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement each includes a covenant, solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility and the Commodity-Linked Facility and solely during a compliance period (which, in general, is applicable when the aggregate revolving borrowings and issued revolving letters of credit (in excess of $300 million) exceed 30% of the revolving commitments)commitments, provided that solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility only such amounts in excess of $300 million are taken into account for purposes of determining whether a compliance period is in effect), that requires the consolidated first-lien net leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00. Although1.00 (or, during a collateral suspension period, the consolidated total net leverage ratio not to exceed 5.50 to 1.00). In addition, each of the Secured LOC Facilities includes a covenant that requires the consolidated first-lien net leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00 (or, for certain facilities that include a collateral suspension mechanism, during a collateral suspension period, endedthe consolidated total net leverage ratio not to exceed 5.50 to 1.00). As of December 31, 2020 was not a compliance period,2023, we would have beenwere in compliance with thisthe Vistra Operations Credit Agreement, Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement and Secured LOC Facilities financial covenant if it was required to be tested at such date.covenants.

See Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for discussion of other covenants related to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.

Collateral Support Obligations

The RCT has rules in place to assure that parties can meet their mining reclamation obligations. In September 2016, the RCT agreed to a collateral bond of up to $975 million to support Luminant's reclamation obligations. The collateral bond is effectively a first lien on all of Vistra Operations' assets (which ranks pari passu with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities) that contractually enables the RCT to be paid (up to $975 million) before the other first-lien lenders in the event of a liquidation of our assets. Collateral support relates to land mined or being mined and not yet reclaimed as well as land for which permits have been obtained but mining activities have not yet begun and land already reclaimed but not released from regulatory obligations by the RCT, and includes cost contingency amounts.

The PUCT has rules in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of each REP, including the ability to return customer deposits, if necessary. Under these rules, at December 31, 2020,2023, Vistra has posted letters of credit in the amount of $102$91 million with the PUCT, which is subject to adjustments.

The ISOs/RTOs we operate in have rules in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of parties that participate in the markets operated by those ISOs/RTOs. Under these rules, Vistra has posted collateral support totaling $290$554 million in the form of letters of credit, $10$30 million in the form of a surety bond and $1$3 million of cash at December 31, 20202023 (which is subject to daily adjustments based on settlement activity with the ISOs/RTOs).

Material Cross-Default/Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions

Certain of our contractual arrangements contain provisions that could result in an event of default if there waswere a failure under financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe covenants that could result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross-default""cross default" or "cross-acceleration""cross acceleration" provisions.

A default by Vistra Operations or any of its restricted subsidiaries in respect of certain specified indebtedness in an aggregate amount in excess of the greater of $300 million and 17.5% of Consolidated EBITDA may result in a cross default under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.Facilities and the Commodity-Linked Facility. Such a default would allow the lenders under each such facility to accelerate the maturity of outstanding balances (approximately $2.57under such facilities, which totaled approximately $2.5 billion atand zero, respectively, as of December 31, 2020) under such facilities.2023.

Each of Vistra Operations' (or its subsidiaries') commodity hedging agreements and interest rate swap agreements that are secured with a lien on its assets on a pari passu basis with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities lenders contains a cross-default provision. An event of a default by Vistra Operations or any of its subsidiaries relating to indebtedness equal to or above a threshold defined in the applicable agreement that results in the acceleration of such debt, would give such counterparty under these hedging agreements the right to terminate its hedge or interest rate swap agreement with Vistra Operations (or its applicable subsidiary) and require all outstanding obligations under such agreement to be settled.

71

Table of Contents
Under the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures, and the Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture and the Indenture governing the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any Guarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of such indebtedness in an aggregate amount of $300 million or more may result in a cross default under the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes, the Senior Secured Notes, the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, the Receivables Facility, the Alternate LOC Facilities,Commodity-Linked Facility and other current or future documents evidencing any indebtedness for borrowed money by the applicable borrower or issuer, as the case may be, and the applicable Guarantor Subsidiaries party thereto.

Additionally, we enter into energy-related physical and financial contracts, the master forms of which contain provisions whereby an event of default or acceleration of settlement would occur if we were to default under an obligation in respect of borrowings in excess of thresholds, which may vary by contract.
80

Table of Contents

The Receivables Facility contains a cross-default provision. The cross-default provision applies, among other instances, if TXU Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Ambit Texas, Value Based Brands, and TriEagle Energy, each indirect subsidiaries of Vistra and originators under the Receivables Facility (Originators), and Vistra or any of their respective subsidiaries fails to make a payment of principal or interest on any indebtedness that is outstanding in a principal amount of at least $300 million, or,in the case of Vistra, and in a principal amount of at least $50 million, in the case of TXU Energy or any of the other Originators, in a principal amount of at least $50 million, after the expiration of any applicable grace period, or if other events occur or circumstances exist under such indebtedness which give rise to a right of the debtholder to accelerate such indebtedness, or if such indebtedness becomes due before its stated maturity. If this cross-default provision is triggered, a termination event under the Receivables Facility would occur and the Receivables Facility may be terminated.

The Repurchase Facility contains a cross-default provision. The cross-default provision applies, among other instances, if an event of default (or similar event) occurs under the Receivables Facility or the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. If this cross-default provision is triggered, a termination event under the Repurchase Facility would occur and the Repurchase Facility may be terminated.

Under the AlternateSecured LOC Facilities, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any Guarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that resultsof its restricted subsidiaries in the accelerationrespect of suchcertain specified indebtedness in an aggregate amount in excess of $300 million or more, may result in a termination of the Alternate LOC Facilities.

Undercross default under the Secured LOC Facilities,Facilities. In addition, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for borrowed money by Vistra Operations or any Guarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of such indebtedness in an aggregate amount of $300 million or more, may result in a termination of the Secured LOC Facilities.

Guarantor Summary Financial Information

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we fully redeemedUnder the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes that were previously guaranteed by substantially all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The following tables summarize the combined financial information of (i) Vistra Corp. (Parent), which is the ultimate parent companyIndenture and issuer of the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes with effect as ofSecured Indenture governing the Merger Date, on a stand-alone, unconsolidated basis and (ii) the guarantor subsidiaries of Vistra (Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Guarantor Subsidiaries consist of the wholly owned subsidiaries, which jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally, guaranteed the payment obligations under the Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the Vistra7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes and Note 14 to the Financial Statements6.950% Senior Secured Notes, respectively, a default under any document evidencing indebtedness for discussion of dividend restrictions ofborrowed money by Vistra Operations (a guarantor subsidiaryor any Guarantor Subsidiary for failure to pay principal when due at final maturity or that results in the acceleration of Vistra)such indebtedness in an aggregate amount that exceeds the greater of 1.5% of total assets and Parent.

This financial information should$600 million may result in a cross default under the respective notes and other current or future documents evidencing any indebtedness for borrowed money by the applicable borrower or issuer, as the case may be, read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Vistra. Transactions between the Parent and the applicable Guarantor Subsidiaries have been eliminated. The inclusion of Vistra's subsidiaries as Guarantor Subsidiaries in the summary financial information is determined as of the most recent balance sheet date presented.

The Parent files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. All consolidated income tax expense or benefits and deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Guarantor summary financial information presented below, with no allocation made to the non-guarantor subsidiaries. Additionally, all corporate shared service costs are included in the Guarantor summary financial information with no allocation to the non-guarantor subsidiaries.
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Revenues$10,954 
Operating income$1,592 
Net income$678 
Net income attributable to Vistra$678 

December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Current assets$2,404 Current liabilities$1,828 
Noncurrent assets21,307 Noncurrent liabilities13,599 
Total assets$23,711 Total liabilities$15,427 
Noncontrolling interest$— 
81

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for long-term debt maturities, Note 12 to the Financial Statements for maturities of lease liabilities and Note 13 to the Financial Statements for commitments related to long-term service and maintenance contracts, energy-related contracts and other agreements.party thereto.

Guarantees

See Note 1314 to the Financial Statements for discussion of guarantees.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESCommitments and Contingencies

See Note 1314 to the Financial Statements for discussion of commitments and contingencies.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDSChanges in Accounting Standards

See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for discussion of changes in accounting standards.

72


Table of Contents
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk that in the normal course of business we may experience a loss in value due tobecause of changes in market conditions that affect economic factors such as commodity prices, interest rates and counterparty credit. Our exposure to market risk is affected by several factors, including the size, duration and composition of our energy and financial portfolio, as well as the volatility and liquidity of markets. Instruments used to manage this exposure include interest rate swaps to hedge debt costs, as well as exchange-traded, over-the-counter contracts and other contractual arrangements to hedge commodity prices.

Risk Oversight

We manage the commodity price, counterparty credit and commodity-related operational risk related to the competitive energy business within limitations established by senior management and in accordance with overall risk management framework established and overseen by the Company's board of directors (Board) and the sustainability and risk committee of the Board, as applicable.policies. Interest rate risk is managed centrally by our treasury function. Market risks are monitored by risk management groups that operate independently of the wholesale commercial operations, utilizing defined practices and analytical methodologies. These techniques measure the risk of change in value of the portfolio of contracts and the hypothetical effect on this value from changes in market conditions and include, but are not limited to, position reporting and review, Value at Risk (VaR) methodologies and stress test scenarios. Key risk control activities include, but are not limited to, transaction review and approval (including credit review), operational and market risk measurement, transaction authority oversight, validation of transaction capture, market price validation and reporting, and portfolio valuation and reporting.reporting, including mark-to-market, VaR and other risk measurement metrics.

Vistra has a risk management organization that enforces applicable risk limits, including the respective policies and procedures to ensure compliance with such limits, and evaluates the risks inherent in our businesses.

Commodity Price Risk

Our business is subject to the inherent risks of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, natural gas and other energy-related products it markets or purchases. We actively manage the portfolio of generation assets, fuel supply and retail sales load to mitigate the near-term impacts of these risks on results of operations. Similar to other participants in the market, we cannot fully manage the long-term value impact of structural declines or increases in natural gas and power prices.

In managing energy price risk, we enter into a variety of market transactions including, but not limited to, short- and long-term contracts for physical delivery, exchange-traded and over-the-counter financial contracts and bilateral contracts with customers. Activities include hedging, the structuring of long-term contractual arrangements and proprietary trading. We continuously monitor the valuation of identified risks and adjust positions based on current market conditions. We strive to use consistent assumptions regarding forward market price curves in evaluating and recording the effects of commodity price risk.

VaR Methodology

A VaR methodology is used to measure the amount of market risk that exists within the portfolio under a variety of market conditions. The resultant VaR produces an estimate of a portfolio's potential for loss given a specified confidence level and considers, among other things, market movements utilizing standard statistical techniques given historical and projected market prices and volatilities.

82

Parametric processes are used to calculate VaR and are considered by management to be the most effective way to estimate changes in a portfolio's value based on assumed market conditions for liquid markets. The use of this method requires a number of key assumptions, such as use of (i) an assumed confidence level, (ii) an assumed holding period (i.e., the time necessary for management action, such as to liquidate positions) and (iii) historical estimates of volatility and correlation data. The table below details a VaR measure related to various portfolios of contracts.

73

VaR for Underlying Generation Assets and Energy-Related Contracts

This measurement estimates the potential loss in value, due to changes in market conditions, of all underlying generation assets and contracts, based on a 95% confidence level and an assumed holding period of 60 days. The forward period covered by this calculation includes the current and subsequent calendar year at the time of calculation.
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
202320232022
Month-end average VaRMonth-end average VaR$234 $263 
Month-end high VaRMonth-end high VaR$361 $520 
Month-end low VaRMonth-end low VaR$164 $103 

The month-end high VaR risk measuresmeasure in 2020 were primarily comparable to2023 is currently lower than the prior year. Month-end high VaR was lower in 2020year due to lower prices and a decrease in volatility in ERCOT as compared to the prior year.higher hedge levels.

Price Sensitivities

The following sensitivity table provides approximate estimates of the potential impact of movements in power prices and spark spreads (the difference between the power revenue and fuel expense of natural gas-fired generation as calculated using an assumed Heat Rate of 7.2 MMBtu/MWh) on realized pre-tax earnings (in millions) taking into account the hedge positions noted above for the periods presented. The residual natural gas position is calculated based on two steps: first, calculating the difference between actual Heat Rates of our natural gas generation units and the assumed 7.2 Heat Rate used to calculate the sensitivity to spark spreads; and second, calculating the residual natural gas exposure that is not already included in the natural gas generation spark spread sensitivity shown in the table below. The estimates related to price sensitivity are based on our expected generation, related hedges and forward prices as of December 31, 2023.
20242025
Texas:
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$$
Nuclear/Renewable/Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(4)$(8)
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$$10 
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$(6)$(9)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(9)$
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$$(11)
East:
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$$11 
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$— $(10)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$(7)$(25)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$$25 
West:
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh increase in spark spread$— $
Natural Gas Generation: $1.00/MWh decrease in spark spread$— $(1)
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu increase in natural gas price$$
Residual Natural Gas Position: $0.25/MMBtu decrease in natural gas price$(1)$(2)
Sunset: 
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh increase in power price$$27 
Coal Generation: $2.50/MWh decrease in power price$(2)$(27)

74

Table of Contents
Interest Rate Risk

We manage our interest rate risk to limit the impact of interest rate changes on our results of operations and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, a majority of our borrowings have fixed interest rates. The inflationary environment continues to drive elevated interest rates, resulting in increased expected refinancing or borrowing costs. See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events, and Items Influencing Future Performance– Macroeconomic Conditions.

The following table provides information concerning our financial instruments at December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Debt amounts consist of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. See Note 1112 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of these financial instruments.
Expected Maturity Date2020
Total Carrying
Amount
2020
Total Fair
Value
2019
Total Carrying
Amount
2019
Total Fair
Value
20212022202320242025There-after
Expected Maturity DateExpected Maturity Date2023
Total Carrying
Amount
2023
Total Fair
Value
2022
Total Carrying
Amount
2022
Total Fair
Value
2024
Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):
Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):
Long-term debt, including current maturities (a):
Variable rate debt amount
Variable rate debt amount
Variable rate debt amountVariable rate debt amount$28 $29 $28 $29 $2,458 $— $2,572 $2,565 $2,700 $2,717 
Average interest rate (b)Average interest rate (b)1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %1.90 %— %1.90 %3.55 %
Debt swapped to fixed (c):Debt swapped to fixed (c):
Debt swapped to fixed (c):
Debt swapped to fixed (c):
Notional amount
Notional amount
Notional amountNotional amount$— $— $2,300 $— $— $2,300 $4,600 $4,600 
Average pay rateAverage pay rate3.76 %3.76 %4.18 %4.77 %4.77 %4.77 %
Average pay rate
Average pay rate
Average receive rate
Average receive rate
Average receive rateAverage receive rate1.90 %1.90 %1.97 %2.06 %2.06 %2.06 %
___________
(a)Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs are excluded from the table.
(b)The weighted average interest rate presented is based on the rates in effect at December 31, 2020.2023.
(c)Interest rate swaps have maturity dates through December 2030, of which $1.625 billion become effective in July 2026. Excludes $2.12 billionMaturities are presented net of $600 million and $700 million of debt swapped to variable maturing in 2024 and 2026, respectively, that is matched against the terms of $2.12 billionthe equivalent amounts of debt swapped to fixed that effectively fix the out-of-the-money position of such swaps (see Note 1112 to the Financial Statements).

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, the potential reduction of annual pretax earnings over the next twelve months due to a one percentage-point (100 basis points) increase in floating interest rates on long-term debt totaled approximately $6$2 million taking into account the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 1112 to Financial Statements.

83

Table of Contents
Credit Risk

Credit risk relates to the risk of loss associated with nonperformance by counterparties. We minimize credit risk by evaluating potential counterparties, monitoring ongoing counterparty risk and assessing overall portfolio risk. This includes review of counterparty financial condition, current and potential credit exposures, credit rating and other quantitative and qualitative credit criteria. We also employ certain risk mitigation practices, including utilization of standardized master agreements that provide for netting and setoff rights, as well as credit enhancements such as margin deposits and customer deposits, letters of credit, parental guarantees and surety bonds. See Note 1617 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of this exposure.

Bankruptcies — We are party to (i) certain gas transportation agreements with PG&E and (ii) a long-term resource adequacy contract with PG&E in connection with the Moss Landing battery storage project, which was originally approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in November 2018. PG&E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2019. In November 2019, the bankruptcy court approved PG&E's motion requesting approval of the assumption of the resource adequacy contract subject to the CPUC approving the terms of an amendment to the resource adequacy contract, and the CPUC approved the terms of the amendment in January 2020. PG&E emerged from bankruptcy protection in July 2020.Credit Exposure

Credit ExposureOur gross credit exposure (excluding collateral impacts) associated with retail and wholesale trade accounts receivable and net derivative assets arising from commodity contracts and hedging and trading activities totaled $1.282$1.976 billion at December 31, 2020.2023.

At
75

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2020,2023, Retail segment credit exposure totaled $990 million,approximately $1.302 billion, including $982 million$1.241 billion of trade accounts receivable and $8$61 million related to derivative assets.derivatives. Cash deposits and letters of credit held as collateral for these receivables totaled $80$54 million, resulting in a net exposure of $910 million.$1.248 billion. Allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable are established for the potentialexpected loss from nonpayment by these customers based on historical experience, market or operational conditions and changes in the financial condition of large business customers.

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, aggregate Texas, East, Sunset and SunsetAsset Closure segments credit exposure totaled $292$674 million including $163$545 million related to derivative assets and $129 million of trade accounts receivable, after taking into account master netting agreement provisions but excluding collateral impacts.

Including collateral posted to us by counterparties, our net Texas, East, Sunset and SunsetAsset Closure segments exposure was $281$551 million, substantially all of which is with investment grade customers as seen in the following table that presents the distribution of credit exposure atby counterparty credit quality as of December 31, 2020.2023. Credit collateral includes cash and letters of credit but excludes other credit enhancements such as guarantees or liens on assets.
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral
Credit
Collateral
Net
Exposure
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral
Exposure
Before Credit
Collateral
Investment grade
Investment grade
Investment gradeInvestment grade$254 $$249 
Below investment grade or no ratingBelow investment grade or no rating38 32 
Below investment grade or no rating
Below investment grade or no rating
Totals
Totals
TotalsTotals$292 $11 $281 

Significant (i.e., 10% or greater) concentration of credit exposure exists with one counterparty,two counterparties, which represented an aggregate $85$293 million, or 30%53%, of theour total net exposure.exposure as of December 31, 2023. We view exposure to this counterpartythese counterparties to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance due to the counterparty'scounterparties' credit ratings, which is rated as investment grade, the counterparty'scounterparties' market role and deemed creditworthiness and the importance of our business relationship with the counterparty. An event of default by one or more counterparties could subsequently result in termination-related settlement payments that reduce available liquidity if amounts such as margin deposits are owed to the counterparties or delays in receipts of expected settlements owed to us.

Contracts classified as "normal" purchase or sale and non-derivative contractual commitments are not marked-to-market in the financial statements and are excluded from the detail above. Such contractual commitments may contain pricing that is favorable considering current market conditions and therefore represent economic risk if the counterparties do not perform.


84

Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and other presentations made by us contain "forward-looking statements." All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including (without limitation) such matters as activities related to our financial or operational projections, capital allocation, capital expenditures, liquidity, dividend policy, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of power generation assets, market and industry developments and the growth of our businesses and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "intends," "plans," "will likely," "unlikely," "expected," "anticipated," "estimated," "should," "may," "projection," "target," "goal," "objective" and "outlook"), are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that in making any such forward-looking statement our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and risks and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion under Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this annual report on Form 10-K and the following important factors, among others, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in or implied by such forward-looking statements:

the actions and decisions of judicial and regulatory authorities;
prohibitions and other restrictions on our operations due to the terms of our agreements;
prevailing federal, state and local governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the legislatures and other government actions of states in which we operate, the U.S. Congress, the FERC, the NERC, the TRE, the public utility commissions of states and locales in which we operate, CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the RCT, the NRC, the EPA, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate, the MSHA and the CFTC, with respect to, among other things:
allowed prices;
industry, market and rate structure;
purchased power and recovery of investments;
operations of nuclear generation facilities;
operations of fossil-fueled generation facilities;
operations of mines;
acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities;
development, construction and operation of facilities;
decommissioning costs;
present or prospective wholesale and retail competition;
changes in federal, state and local tax laws, rates and policies, including additional regulation, interpretations, amendments, or technical corrections to the TCJA;
changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies, including the Coal Combustion Residuals Rule, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard, regional haze program implementation and GHG and other climate change initiatives; and
clearing over-the-counter derivatives through exchanges and posting of cash collateral therewith;
expectations regarding, or impacts of, environmental matters, including costs of compliance, availability and adequacy of emission credits, and the impact of ongoing proceedings and potential regulations or changes to current regulations, including those relating to climate change, air emissions, cooling water intake structures, coal combustion byproducts, and other laws and regulations that we are, or could become, subject to, which could increase our costs, result in an impairment of our assets, cause us to limit or terminate the operation of certain of our facilities, or otherwise negatively impact our financial results or stock price;
legal and administrative proceedings and settlements;
general industry trends;
economic conditions, including the impact of any recession or economic downturn;
investor sentiment relating to climate change and utilization of fossil fuels in connection with power generation could reduce demand for, or increase potential volatility in the market price of, our common stock;
the severity, magnitude and duration of pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and the resulting effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows;
the severity, magnitude and duration of extreme weather events (including winter storm Uri), drought and limitations on access to water, and other weather conditions and natural phenomena, and the resulting effects on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows;
acts of sabotage, wars or terrorist or cybersecurity threats or activities;
risk of contract performance claims by us or our counterparties, and risks of, or costs associated with, pursuing or defending such claims;
our ability to collect trade receivables from counterparties in the amount or at the time expected, if at all;
85

Table of Contents
our ability to attract, retain and profitably serve customers;
restrictions on competitive retail pricing or direct-selling businesses;
adverse publicity associated with our retail products or direct selling businesses, including our ability to address the marketplace and regulators regarding our compliance with applicable laws;
changes in wholesale electricity prices or energy commodity prices, including the price of natural gas;
changes in prices of transportation of natural gas, coal, fuel oil and other refined products;
sufficiency of, access to, and costs associated with coal, fuel oil, and natural gas inventories and transportation and storage thereof;
changes in the ability of vendors to provide or deliver commodities as needed;
beliefs and assumptions about the benefits of state- or federal-based subsidies to our market competition, and the corresponding impacts on us, including if such subsidies are disproportionately available to our competitors;
the effects of, or changes to, market design and the power and capacity procurement processes in the markets in which we operate;
changes in market heat rates in the CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO and PJM electricity markets;
our ability to effectively hedge against unfavorable commodity prices, including the price of natural gas, market heat rates and interest rates;
population growth or decline, or changes in market supply or demand and demographic patterns, particularly in ERCOT, MISO and PJM;
our ability to mitigate forced outage risk, including managing risk associated with CP in PJM and performance incentives in ISO-NE;
efforts to identify opportunities to reduce congestion and improve busbar power prices;
access to adequate transmission facilities to meet changing demands;
changes in interest rates, commodity prices, rates of inflation or foreign exchange rates;
changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures;
commercial bank market and capital market conditions and the potential impact of disruptions in U.S. and international credit markets;
access to capital, the attractiveness of the cost and other terms of such capital and the success of financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in capital markets;
our ability to maintain prudent financial leverage and achieve our capital allocation objectives;
our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to make principal and interest payments in respect of, or refinance, our debt obligations;
our expectation that we will continue to pay a comparable cash dividend on a quarterly basis;
our ability to implement and successfully execute upon\ our growth strategy, including the completion and integration of mergers, acquisitions and/or joint venture activity, the identification and completion of sales and divestitures activity, and the completion and commercialization of our other business development and construction projects;
competition for new energy development and other business opportunities;
inability of various counterparties to meet their obligations with respect to our financial instruments;
counterparties' collateral demands and other factors affecting our liquidity position and financial condition;
changes in technology (including large scale electricity storage) used by and services offered by us;
changes in electricity transmission that allow additional power generation to compete with our generation assets;
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees;
significant changes in our relationship with our employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur or changes in laws or regulations relating to independent contractor status;
changes in assumptions used to estimate costs of providing employee benefits, including medical and dental benefits, pension and OPEB, and future funding requirements related thereto, including joint and several liability exposure under ERISA;
hazards customary to the industry and the possibility that we may not have adequate insurance to cover losses resulting from such hazards;
the impact of our obligations under the TRA;
our ability to optimize our assets through targeted investment in cost-effective technology enhancements and operations performance initiatives;
our ability to effectively and efficiently plan, prepare for and execute expected asset retirements and reclamation obligations and the impacts thereof;
our ability to successfully complete the integration of businesses acquired by Vistra and our ability to successfully capture the full amount of projected operational and financial synergies relating to such transactions; and
actions by credit rating agencies.

86

Table of Contents
Any forward-looking statement speaks only at the date on which it is made, and except as may be required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict them. In addition, we may be unable to assess the impact of any such event or condition or the extent to which any such event or condition, or combination of events or conditions, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in or implied by any forward-looking statement. As such, you should not unduly rely on such forward-looking statements.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET INFORMATION

Certain industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources, including certain data published by CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM, the environmental regulatory bodies of states in which we operate and NYMEX. We did not commission any of these publications, reports or other sources. Some data is also based on good faith estimates, which are derived from our review of internal surveys, as well as the independent sources listed above. Industry publications, reports and other sources generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While we believe that each of these studies, publications, reports and other sources is reliable, we have not independently investigated or verified the information contained or referred to therein and make no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Forecasts are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time, and we do not know what assumptions were used in preparing such forecasts. Statements regarding industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors.


8776

Table of Contents
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Vistra Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vistra Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, the related consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of cash flows, and consolidated statement of changes in equity, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2023, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(b) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"“financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020,2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2021,28, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sCompany’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit MattersMatter

The critical audit mattersmatter communicated below are mattersis a matter arising from the current periodcurrent-period audit of the financial statements that werewas communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relaterelates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit mattersmatter below, providing a separate opinionsopinion on the critical audit mattersmatter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.it relates.

Tax Receivable Agreement Obligation
77

Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurements — Certain Complex Level 3 Derivative Assets and Liabilities — Refer to Notes 1 and 816 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company has a tax receivable agreement (TRA) obligation that requires the Company to make annual payments to the TRA rights holders based on cash savings in income tax resulting from a step up in the tax basis of certain assets upon emergence from bankruptcy in 2016. The carrying value of the TRA obligation is based on the discounted amount of forecasted payments to the TRA rights holders. Determining the carrying value of the TRA obligation requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions in preparing its forecast of taxable income for a period of approximately 40 years. Changes to either the estimated timing or amount of expected TRA payments impact the carrying value of the obligation. As of December 31, 2020, the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaled $450 million.

88

Table of Contents
Given the significant judgements made by management to estimate the TRA obligation, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimate and assumptions related to the estimated future taxable income required a high degree of auditor judgement and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our income tax specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of estimated future taxable income included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s determination of the TRA obligation carrying amount, including controls over developing estimated future taxable income.

With the assistance of our income tax specialists, we evaluated the following elements in testing management’s estimated future taxable income:

The application of tax laws and regulations

Future reversals of existing temporary differences, including the timing and amount of loss carryforwards

We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s estimates of future taxable income by comparing the estimates to:

Historical taxable income

Internal communications to management and the Board of Directors

Forecasted information included in the Company's press releases as well as in analyst and industry reports for the Company

We assessed the consistency of future taxable income with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit.

Fair Value Measurements Level 3 Derivative Assets and Liabilities — Refer to Notes 1 and 15 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company hasderivative assets and liabilities whose fair values are based on complex proprietary models andand/or unobservable inputs. These financial instruments can span a broad array of productcontract types, some of which include especially complex valuations due to unique contract terms and generally includesignificant judgement by management in estimating prices or volumes, including (1) electricitypower purchases and sales that include power and heat rate positions; (2) physical power and natural gas options and swaptions; (3) forward purchase contracts offor congestion revenue rights and financial transmission rights; (3) physical electricity options, spread options, swaptions, and natural gas options; and (4) contracts for natural gas and coal.retail sales contracts. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these financial instruments are generally classified as Level 3 derivative assets or liabilities. As of December 31, 2020, the fair value of the Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities totaled $205 million and $183 million, respectively.

Given management uses complex proprietary models and/or unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of the aforementioned Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our energy commodity fair value specialists who possess significant quantitative and modeling expertise.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of the fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over derivative asset and liability valuations, including controls related to price verificationappropriate application of illiquid price curves.

We assessed to determine if management had consistently appliedcurves and other significant unobservable valuation assumptions.inputs.

89

Table of Contents
We obtained the Company's complete listing of derivative assets and liabilities and related fair values as of December 31, 2020,2023, to confirm ourobtain an understanding of the types of instruments outstanding and performed a sensitivity analysis to understand the most significant assumptions impacting fair value.outstanding.

We assessed the consistency by which management has applied illiquid price curves and significant unobservable valuation inputs.
With the assistance of our energy commodity fair value specialists, we developed independent estimates of the fair value of a sample of Level 3 derivative instruments and compared our estimates to the Company's estimates.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—Refer to Notes 1 and 21 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. Indicators of impairment may include declines in the forward prices of natural gas or electricity subsequent to the asset acquisition date, or an expectation that "more likely than not" a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. Management determines if long-lived assets are impaired by comparing the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying value. The forecasted undiscounted future cash flows include significant unobservable inputs such as forward natural gas and electricity prices, forward capacity prices, the effects of enacted environmental rules, generation plant performance, forecasted capital expenditures and forecasted delivered fuel prices. The carrying value of such assets is not recoverable if the forecasted undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying value. If the long-lived assets are not recoverable, fair value will be calculated based on a market participant view and a loss will be recorded based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. In determining the fair value of the long-lived assets, management uses a combination of a market approach valuation based on transactions of similar assets and an income approach valuation discounting the forecasted future cash flows. In 2020, management evaluated several of its power generation facilities for recoverability. Management concluded that three of the power generation facilities evaluated were not recoverable. The Company recorded impairment losses related to the three facilities of $324 million in 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the total carrying value of long-lived property, plant and equipment assets that are subject to evaluation for indicators of impairment was approximately $13.5 billion.

Given (1) management's evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets required management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to the development of forecasted undiscounted future cash flows, and (2) for those long-lived assets deemed impaired, the determination of fair value required management to make significant estimates and assumptions related to the discount rates to apply to the forecasted future cash flows, performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our energy commodity fair value specialists and fair value specialists.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the evaluation of management’s estimate of the forecasted future cash flows utilized in the evaluation of recoverability and determination of fair value of the long-lived assets deemed to be impaired included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s development of the assumptions used to estimate the forecasted future cash flows for the long-lived assets.

We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasted generation plant performance and forecasted capital expenditures assumptions by comparing the estimates to:

Historical generation volume output and capital expenditures for the respective long-lived assets

Internal communications to management and the Board of Directors

With the assistance of our energy commodity fair value specialists:

We developed independent estimates of the forward natural gas and electricity prices and compared our estimates to the Company's estimates.

We evaluated the reasonableness of the Company's forward capacity prices, including the key assumptions underlying the development of those prices.

90

Table of Contents
With the assistance of our fair value specialists:

We developed a range of independent discount rates and compared those to the discount rates used by management in the income approach used to determine fair value of the impaired long-lived assets.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 26, 202128, 2024

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

91
78

Table of Contents
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Operating revenues (Note 5)$11,443 $11,809 $9,144 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(5,174)(5,742)(5,036)
Operating costs(1,622)(1,530)(1,297)
Depreciation and amortization(1,737)(1,640)(1,394)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1,035)(904)(926)
Impairment of long-lived assets(356)
Operating income1,519 1,993 491 
Other income (Note 21)34 56 47 
Other deductions (Note 21)(42)(15)(5)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 21)(630)(797)(572)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 8)(37)(79)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment (Note 21)16 17 
Income (loss) before income taxes890 1,216 (101)
Income tax (expense) benefit (Note 7)(266)(290)45 
Net income (loss)624 926 (56)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest12 
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra$636 $928 $(54)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic488,668,263 494,146,268 504,954,371 
Diluted491,090,468 499,935,490 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding:
Basic$1.30 $1.88 $(0.11)
Diluted$1.30 $1.86 $(0.11)
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Operating revenues (Note 5)$14,779 $13,728 $12,077 
Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees(7,557)(10,401)(9,169)
Operating costs(1,702)(1,645)(1,559)
Depreciation and amortization(1,502)(1,596)(1,753)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1,308)(1,189)(1,040)
Impairment of long-lived and other assets(49)(74)(71)
Operating income (loss)2,661 (1,177)(1,515)
Other income (Note 22)257 117 140 
Other deductions (Note 22)(14)(4)(16)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 22)(740)(368)(384)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 8)(164)(128)53 
Net income (loss) before income taxes2,000 (1,560)(1,722)
Income tax (expense) benefit (Note 7)(508)350 458 
Net income (loss)1,492 (1,210)(1,264)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(17)(10)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra1,493 (1,227)(1,274)
Cumulative dividends attributable to preferred stock(150)(150)(21)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra common stock$1,343 $(1,377)$(1,295)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic369,771,359 422,447,074 482,214,544 
Diluted375,193,110 422,447,074 482,214,544 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding:
Basic$3.63 $(3.26)$(2.69)
Diluted$3.58 $(3.26)$(2.69)

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effects:
Effects related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations (net of tax benefit of $5, $4 and $2)(18)(8)(6)
Adoption of new accounting standard
Total other comprehensive loss(18)(8)(5)
Comprehensive income (loss)606 918 (61)
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest12 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Vistra$618 $920 $(59)
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Net income (loss)$1,492 $(1,210)$(1,264)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:
Effects related to pension and other retirement benefit obligations (net of tax expense of $—, $7 and $9)(1)23 32 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)(1)23 32 
Comprehensive income (loss)1,491 (1,187)(1,232)
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest(17)(10)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Vistra$1,492 $(1,204)$(1,242)

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
9279

Table of Contents

VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Cash flows — operating activities:Cash flows — operating activities:
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)$624 $926 $(56)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities:
Net income (loss)
Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortizationDepreciation and amortization2,048 1,876 1,533 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit), netDeferred income tax expense (benefit), net230 281 (62)
Impairment of long-lived assets (Note 4)356 
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP (Note 21)29 
Gain on sale of land
Gain on sale of land
Gain on sale of land
Impairment of long-lived and other assets
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commoditiesUnrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commodities(231)(696)380 
Unrealized net loss from mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps155 220 
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commodities
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of commodities
Unrealized net (gain) loss from mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps
Change in asset retirement obligation liabilityChange in asset retirement obligation liability(48)(27)
Asset retirement obligation accretion expenseAsset retirement obligation accretion expense43 53 50 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement (Note 8)(5)37 79 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement
Gain on TRA settlement
Bad debt expenseBad debt expense110 82 55 
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation65 47 73 
Other, netOther, net(22)(12)37 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable — tradeAccounts receivable — trade(33)(88)(207)
Accounts receivable — trade
Accounts receivable — trade
InventoriesInventories(59)(44)61 
Accounts payable — tradeAccounts payable — trade(40)(221)90 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilitiesCommodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities27 98 (80)
Margin deposits, netMargin deposits, net(20)170 (221)
Uplift securitization proceeds receivable from ERCOT
Accrued interestAccrued interest(20)80 (105)
Accrued taxesAccrued taxes22 (4)(64)
Accrued employee incentiveAccrued employee incentive39 40 
Tax Receivable Agreement payment (Note 8)(2)(16)
Asset retirement obligation settlement
Asset retirement obligation settlement
Asset retirement obligation settlementAsset retirement obligation settlement(118)(121)(100)
Major plant outage deferralMajor plant outage deferral(19)(22)
Other — net assetsOther — net assets219 (22)73 
Other — net liabilitiesOther — net liabilities(91)142 (45)
Cash provided by operating activities3,337 2,736 1,471 
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Cash flows — investing activities:Cash flows — investing activities:
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel purchases and LTSA prepayments
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel purchases and LTSA prepayments
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel purchases and LTSA prepaymentsCapital expenditures, including nuclear fuel purchases and LTSA prepayments(1,259)(713)(530)
Ambit acquisition (net of cash acquired) (Note 2)(506)
Crius acquisition (net of cash acquired) (Note 2)(374)
Cash acquired in the Merger (Note 2)445 
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 21)433 431 252 
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities (Note 21)(455)(453)(274)
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Proceeds from sales of nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Investments in nuclear decommissioning trust fund securities
Proceeds from sales of environmental allowancesProceeds from sales of environmental allowances165 197 
Purchases of environmental allowancesPurchases of environmental allowances(504)(322)(5)
Proceeds from sales of assets24 
Insurance proceeds
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
Other, net
Other, net
Other, net
Cash used in investing activities
9380

Table of Contents
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Other, net24 17 
Cash used in investing activities(1,572)(1,717)(101)
Cash flows — financing activities:
Issuances of long-term debt (Note 11)6,507 1,000 
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 11)(1,008)(7,109)(3,075)
Net borrowings/(payments) under accounts receivable securitization program (Note 10)(150)111 339 
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility (Note 11)1,075 650 
Repayments under Revolving Credit Facility (Note 11)(1,425)(300)
Debt tender offer and other debt financing fees (Note 11)(17)(203)(236)
Stock repurchase (Note 14)(656)(763)
Dividends paid to stockholders (Note 14)(266)(243)
Other, net(5)12 
Cash used in financing activities(1,796)(1,237)(2,723)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(31)(218)(1,353)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance475 693 2,046 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$444 $475 $693 
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Cash flows — financing activities:
Issuances of preferred stock— — 2,000 
Issuances of long-term debt2,498 1,498 1,250 
Repayments/repurchases of debt(33)(251)(381)
Borrowings under Term Loan A— — 1,250 
Repayment under Term Loan A— — (1,250)
Proceeds from forward capacity agreement— — 500 
Net borrowings/(repayments) under accounts receivable financing(425)425 (300)
Borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility100 1,750 1,450 
Repayments under Revolving Credit Facility(350)(1,500)(1,450)
Borrowings under Commodity-Linked Facility— 3,150 — 
Repayments under Commodity-Linked Facility(400)(2,750)— 
Debt issuance costs(59)(31)(13)
Stock repurchases(1,245)(1,949)(471)
Dividends paid to common stockholders(313)(302)(290)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders(150)(151)— 
Other, net83 31 (21)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities(294)(80)2,274 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash3,014 (834)915 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance525 1,359 444 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$3,539 $525 $1,359 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
9481

Table of Contents

VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$406 $300 
Restricted cash (Note 21)19 147 
Trade accounts receivable — net (Note 21)1,279 1,365 
Inventories (Note 21)515 469 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 16)748 1,333 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts257 202 
Prepaid expense and other current assets205 298 
Total current assets3,429 4,114 
Restricted cash (Note 21)19 28 
Investments (Note 21)1,759 1,537 
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 21)124 
Operating lease right-of-use assets (Note 12)45 44 
Property, plant and equipment — net (Note 21)13,499 13,914 
Goodwill (Note 6)2,583 2,553 
Identifiable intangible assets — net (Note 6)2,446 2,748 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 16)258 136 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)838 1,066 
Other noncurrent assets332 352 
Total assets$25,208 $26,616 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings (Note 11)$$350 
Accounts receivable securitization program (Note 10)300 450 
Long-term debt due currently (Note 11)95 277 
Trade accounts payable880 947 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 16)789 1,529 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts33 
Accrued income taxes16 
Accrued taxes other than income210 200 
Accrued interest131 151 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 21)103 141 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 12)14 
Other current liabilities471 506 
Total current liabilities3,036 4,574 
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently (Note 11)9,235 10,102 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 12)40 41 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 16)624 396 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation (Note 8)447 455 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 21)2,333 2,097 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (Note 21)1,131 989 
Total liabilities16,847 18,656 
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20232022
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$3,485 $455 
Restricted cash (Note 22)40 37 
Trade accounts receivable — net (Note 22)1,674 2,059 
Income taxes receivable27 
Inventories (Note 22)740 570 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 17)3,645 4,538 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts1,244 3,137 
Margin deposits posted under affiliate financing agreement (Note 11)439 — 
Prepaid expense and other current assets364 293 
Total current assets11,637 11,116 
Restricted cash (Note 22)14 33 
Investments (Note 22)2,035 1,729 
Property, plant and equipment — net (Note 22)12,432 12,554 
Operating lease right-of-use assets (Note 13)50 51 
Goodwill (Note 6)2,583 2,583 
Identifiable intangible assets — net (Note 6)1,864 1,958 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets (Note 17)577 702 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)1,223 1,710 
Other noncurrent assets551 351 
Total assets$32,966 $32,787 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings (Note 12)$— $650 
Accounts receivable financing (Note 10)— 425 
Long-term debt due currently (Note 12)2,286 38 
Trade accounts payable1,147 1,556 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 17)5,258 6,610 
Margin deposits related to commodity contracts45 39 
Accrued taxes other than income203 199 
Accrued interest206 160 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 22)124 128 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 13)
Other current liabilities547 524 
Total current liabilities9,823 10,337 
Margin deposits financing with affiliate (Note 11)439 — 
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently (Note 12)12,116 11,933 
Operating lease liabilities (Note 13)48 45 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities (Note 17)1,688 1,726 
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 7)
Tax Receivable Agreement obligation (Note 8)164 514 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 22)2,414 2,309 
9582

Table of Contents
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)00
Total equity (Note 14):
Common stock (par value — $0.01; number of shares authorized — 1,800,000,000)
(shares outstanding: December 31, 2020 — 489,305,888; December 31, 2019 — 487,698,111)
Treasury stock, at cost (shares: December 31, 2020 — 41,043,224; December 31, 2019 — 41,043,224)(973)(973)
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits (Note 22)
Total liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)
Total equity (Note 15):
Preferred stock, number of shares authorized — 100,000,000; Series A (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series B (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series C (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 — 476,081; December 31, 2022 — zero)
Preferred stock, number of shares authorized — 100,000,000; Series A (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series B (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series C (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 — 476,081; December 31, 2022 — zero)
Preferred stock, number of shares authorized — 100,000,000; Series A (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series B (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 and 2022 — 1,000,000; Series C (liquidation preference — $1,000; shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 — 476,081; December 31, 2022 — zero)
Common stock (par value — $0.01; number of shares authorized — 1,800,000,000)
(shares outstanding: December 31, 2023 — 351,457,016; December 31, 2022 — 389,754,870)
Treasury stock, at cost (shares: December 31, 2023 — 192,178,156; December 31, 2022 — 147,424,202)
Additional paid-in-capitalAdditional paid-in-capital9,786 9,721 
Retained deficitRetained deficit(399)(764)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(48)(30)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Stockholders' equityStockholders' equity8,371 7,959 
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaryNoncontrolling interest in subsidiary(10)
Total equityTotal equity8,361 7,960 
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity$25,208 $26,616 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
9683

Table of Contents
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Millions of Dollars)
Common StockTreasury StockAdditional Paid-In CapitalRetained DeficitAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Total Stockholders' EquityNoncontrolling Interest in SubsidiaryTotal Equity
Balances at December 31, 2017$$$7,765 $(1,410)$(17)$6,342 $— $6,342 
Stock and stock compensation awards issued in connection with the Merger— 1,901 — — 1,902 — 1,902 
Stock repurchases— (778)— — — (778)— (778)
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 72 — — 72 — 72 
Tangible equity units acquired— — 369 — — 369 — 369 
Warrants acquired— — — — — 
Net loss— — — (54)— (54)(2)(56)
Adoption of new accounting standards— — — 16 17 — 17 
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (6)(6)— (6)
Investment by noncontrolling interest— — — — — — 
Other— — (2)(1)— (3)— (3)
Balances at December 31, 2018$$(778)$10,107 $(1,449)$(22)$7,863 $$7,867 
Stock repurchases— (641)— — — (641)— (641)
Shares issued for tangible equity unit contracts— 446 (446)— — — 
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 62 — — 62 — 62 
Net income (loss)— — — 928 — 928 (2)926 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — (243)— (243)— (243)
Adoption of new accounting standard— — — (2)— (2)— (2)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (8)(8)— (8)
Other— — (2)— (1)(1)
Balances at December 31, 2019$$(973)$9,721 $(764)$(30)$7,959 $$7,960 
Effects of stock-based compensation— — 65 — — 65 — 65 
Net income (loss)— — — 636 — 636 (12)624 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — (266)— (266)— (266)
Adoption of new accounting standard— — — (4)— (4)— (4)
Pension and OPEB liability — change in funded status— — — — (18)(18)— (18)
Investment by noncontrolling interest— 
Other— — (1)— (1)— (1)
Balances at December 31, 2020$$(973)$9,786 $(399)$(48)$8,371 $(10)$8,361 
VISTRA CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Millions of Dollars)
Preferred StockCommon StockTreasury StockAdditional Paid-In CapitalRetained DeficitAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)Total Stockholders' EquityNoncontrolling Interest in SubsidiaryTotal Equity
Balances at
December 31, 2020
$— $$(973)$9,786 $(399)$(48)$8,371 $(10)$8,361 
Series A Preferred Stock issued1,000 — — (10)— — 990 — 990 
Series B Preferred Stock issued1,000 — — (15)— — 985 — 985 
Stock repurchases— — (585)— — — (585)— (585)
Effects of stock-based compensation— — — 60 — — 60 — 60 
Net income (loss)— — — — (1,274)— (1,274)10 (1,264)
Dividends declared on common stock— — — — (290)— (290)— (290)
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — — 32 32 — 32 
Investment by noncontrolling interest— — — — — — — 
Other— — — (1)— — 
Balances at
December 31, 2021
$2,000 $$(1,558)$9,824 $(1,964)$(16)$8,291 $$8,292 
Stock repurchases— — (1,837)— — — (1,837)— (1,837)
Effects of stock-based compensation— — — 103 — — 103 — 103 
Net income (loss)— — — — (1,227)— (1,227)17 (1,210)
Dividends declared on common stock— — — — (302)— (302)— (302)
Dividends declared on preferred stock— — — — (151)— (151)— (151)
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — — 23 23 — 23 
Other— — — — (2)— 
Balances at
December 31, 2022
$2,000 $$(3,395)$9,928 $(3,643)$$4,902 $16 $4,918 
Series C Preferred Stock issued476 — — — — — 476 — 476 
Stock repurchases(1,267)(1,267)(1,267)
Effects of stock-based compensation— — — 168 — — 168 — 168 
Net income (loss)— — — — 1,493 — 1,493 (1)1,492 
Dividends declared on common stock— — — — (313)— (313)— (313)
Dividends declared on preferred stock— — — — (150)— (150)— (150)
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)— — — — — (1)(1)— (1)
Other— — — (1)— — (1)— (1)
Balances at
December 31, 2023
$2,476 $$(4,662)$10,095 $(2,613)$$5,307 $15 $5,322 

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
9784

Table of Contents
VISTRA CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

References in this report to "we," "our," "us" and "the Company" are to Vistra and/or its subsidiaries, as apparent in the context. See Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations for defined terms.

Vistra is a holding company operating an integrated retail and electric power generation business primarily in markets throughout the U.S. Through our subsidiaries, we are engaged in competitive energy market activities including powerelectricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management and retail sales of electricity and natural gas to end users. Effective July 2, 2020, we changed our name from Vistra Energy Corp. to Vistra Corp. (Vistra) to distinguish from companies that are involved in the exploring for, producing, refining, or transporting fossil fuels (many of which use "energy" in their names) and to better reflect or integrated business model, which combines a retail electricity and natural gas business focused on serving its customers with new and innovative products and services and an electric power generation business powering the communities we serve with safe, reliable power.

Vistra has 6six reportable segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East, (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes that the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The following is a summary of the updated segments:

The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments. As we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes it is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, respectively, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO that were previously reported in the PJM and NY/NE segments, respectively.
The West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and was previously reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3), the Company expects to expand its operations in the West segment.

In addition, the ERCOT segment was renamed the Texas segment. There were no changes to the Retail and Asset Closure segments. All historical segment results within these consolidated financial statements have been recast to be in alignment with our new segmentation. See Note 2021 for further information concerning our reportable business segments.

Ambit Transaction Agreement

On November 1, 2019,March 6, 2023, Vistra Operations and Merger Sub entered into a transaction agreement (Transaction Agreement) with Energy Harbor pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Energy Harbor, with Energy Harbor surviving as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed(Merger, and collectively with the acquisition of Ambit (Ambit Transaction)other transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, the Transactions). BecauseThe Transaction Agreement, the Ambit Transaction closed on November 1, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statementsMerger and the notes related thereto do not includeother Transactions were approved by each of Vistra's board of directors (Board) and Energy Harbor's board of directors. On February 16, 2024, we received approval from FERC to acquire Energy Harbor. FERC's approval was the financial condition or the operating results of Ambitlast regulatory approval needed, and its subsidiaries prior to Novemberwe anticipate closing on March 1, 2019.2024. See Note 2 for a summary ofmore information concerning the Ambit Transaction.Transaction Agreement.

Crius Transaction

On July 15, 2019, an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra completed the acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly owned the operating business of Crius (Crius Transaction). Because the Crius Transaction closed on July 15, 2019, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Crius and its subsidiaries prior to July 15, 2019. See Note 2 for a summary of the Crius Transaction.

98

Table of Contents
Dynegy Merger Transaction

On the Merger Date, Vistra and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, with Vistra continuing as the surviving corporation. Because the Merger closed on April 9, 2018, Vistra's consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto do not include the financial condition or the operating results of Dynegy prior to April 9, 2018. See Note 2 for a summary of the Merger transaction and business combination accounting.

COVID-19 Pandemic

In March 2020, the World Health Organization categorized the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic, and U.S. Government declared the COVID-19 outbreak a national emergency. The U.S. government has deemed electricity generation, transmission and distribution as "critical infrastructure" providing essential services during this global emergency. As a provider of critical infrastructure, Vistra has an obligation to provide critically needed power to homes, businesses, hospitals and other customers. Vistra remains focused on protecting the health and well-being of its employees and the communities in which it operates while assuring the continuity of its business operations.

The Company's consolidated financial statements reflect estimates and assumptions made by management that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods presented. The Company considered the impact of COVID-19 on the assumptions and estimates used and determined that there have been no material adverse impacts on the Company's results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. See Note 7 for a summary of certain anticipated tax-related impacts of the CARES Act to the Company.

February 2021 Weather EventWinter Storm Uri

In February 2021, a severe winter storm with extremely cold temperatures affected much of the U.S., including Texas. This severe weather resulted in surging demand for power, natural gas supply shortages, operational challenges for generators, and a significant load shed event that was ordered by ERCOT beginning on February 15, 2021 and continuing through February 18, 2021. At the time we issued these financial statements, we expect the impact of the weather event to beWinter Storm Uri had a material loss that will be reflected inadverse impact on our first quarter 2021 results of operations. However, uncertainty exists with respectoperations and operating cash flows.

As part of the 2021 regular Texas legislative sessions and in response to extraordinary costs incurred by electricity market participants during Winter Storm Uri, the Texas legislature passed House Bill (HB) 4492 for ERCOT to obtain financing to distribute to load-serving entities (LSEs) that were uplifted and paid to ERCOT exceptionally high price adders and ancillary service costs during Winter Storm Uri. In October 2021, the PUCT issued a Debt Obligation Order approving $2.1 billion financing and the methodology for allocation of proceeds to the LSEs. In December 2021, ERCOT finalized the amount of allocations to the LSEs, and we received $544 million of proceeds from ERCOT in the second quarter of 2022. The Company accounted for the proceeds we received by analogy to the contribution model within Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 958-605, Not-for-Profit Entities - Revenue Recognition and the grant model within International Accounting Standard 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, as a reduction to expenses in the statements of operations in the annual period for which the proceeds are intended to compensate. We concluded that the threshold for recognizing a receivable was met in December 2021 as the amounts to be received were determinable and ERCOT was directed by its governing body, the PUCT, to take all actions required to effectuate the $2.1 billion funding approved in the Debt Obligation Order. The final financial impact of the weather event due in partWinter Storm Uri continues to outstanding pricing and settlement data from ERCOT,be subject to the outcome of potential litigation arising from the event, or any corrective action taken byevent.

Recent Developments

See Note 8 for information on the State2024 TRA Rights repurchases and tender offer, Note 12 for information on the January 2024 Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer and Note 15 for information on the February 2024 declaration of Texas, ERCOT,common and preferred stock dividends and the RCT, oradditional $1.5 billion authorization under the PUCT to resettle pricing across any portionShare Repurchase Program.

85

Table of the supply chain (i.e. fuel supply, wholesale pricing of generation, or allocating the financial impacts of market-wide load shed ratably across all retail market participants), that is currently being considered or may be considered by any such parties.Contents
Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and on the same basis as the audited financial statements included in our 20192022 Form 10-K. All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements requires estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities atas of the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenue and expense, including fair value measurements, estimates of expected obligations, judgments related to the potential timing of events and other estimates. In the event estimates and/or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.

99

Table of Contents
Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting

We enter into contracts for the purchase and sale of electricity, natural gas, coal uranium and other commodities utilizing instruments such as options, swaps, futures and forwards primarily to manage commodity price and interest rate risks. If the instrument meets the definition of a derivative under accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in net income as unrealized gains and losses. This recognition is referred to as mark-to-market accounting. The fair values of our unsettled derivative instruments under mark-to-market accounting are reported in the consolidated balance sheets as commodity and other derivative contractual assets or liabilities. We report derivative assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets without taking into consideration netting arrangements we have with counterparties. Margin deposits that contractually offset these assets and liabilities are reported separately in the consolidated balance sheets, except for certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral. When derivative instruments are settled and realized gains and losses are recorded, the previously recorded unrealized gains and losses and derivative assets and liabilities are reversed. See Notes 1516 and 1617 for additional information regarding fair value measurement and commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities. A commodity-related derivative contract may be designated as a normal purchase or sale if the commodity is to be physically received or delivered for use or sale in the normal course of business. If designated as normal, the derivative contract is accounted for under the accrual method of accounting (not marked-to-market) with no balance sheet or income statement recognition of the contract until settlement.

Because derivative instruments are frequently used as economic hedges, accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities allow for hedge accounting, which provides for the designation of such instruments as cash flow or fair value hedges if certain conditions are met. AtAs of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, there were no derivative positions accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges.

We report commodity hedging and trading results as revenue, fuel expense or purchased power in the consolidated statements of operations depending on the type of activity. Electricity hedges, financial natural gas hedges and trading activities are primarily reported as revenue. Physical or financial hedges for coal diesel or uranium,fuel oil, along with physical natural gas trades, are primarily reported as fuel expense. Realized and unrealized gains and losses associated with interest rate swap transactions are reported in the consolidated statements of operations in interest expense.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when electricity is delivered to our customers in an amount that we expect to invoice for volumes delivered or services provided. Sales tax is excluded from revenue. Energy sales and services that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.

86

Table of Contents
We record wholesale generation revenue when volumes are delivered or services are performed for transactions that are not accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. These revenues primarily consist of physical electricity sales to the ISO/RTO, ancillary service revenue for reliability services, capacity revenue for making installed generation and demand response available for system reliability requirements, and certain other electricity sales contracts. See Note 5 for detailed descriptions of revenue from contracts with customers. See Derivative Instruments and Mark-to-Market Accounting for revenue recognition related to derivative contracts.

Advertising Expense

We expense advertising costs as incurred and include them within SG&A expenses. Advertising expenses totaled $43 million, $49 million and $46 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite lives) for impairment whenever indications of impairment exist. The carrying value of such assets is deemed to be impaired if the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value. If there is such impairment, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows, supported by available market valuations, if applicable. See Note 2122 for details of impairments of long-lived assets recorded in 2020.recorded.

100

Table of Contents
Finite-lived intangibles identified as a result of fresh start reporting or purchase accounting are amortized over their estimated useful lives based on the expected realization of economic effects. See Note 6 for details of intangible assets with finite lives, including discussion of fair value determinations.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives

As part of fresh start reporting and purchase accounting, reorganization value or the purchase consideration is generally allocated, first, to identifiable tangible assets and liabilities, identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, then any remaining excess reorganization value or purchase consideration is allocated to goodwill. We evaluate goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at least annually, or when indications of impairment exist. We have established October 1 as the date we evaluate goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment. See Note 6 for details of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives, including discussion of fair value determinations.

Nuclear Fuel

Nuclear fuel is capitalized and reported as a component of our property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of nuclear fuel is calculated on the units-of-production method and is reported as a component of fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in our consolidated statements of operations.

Major Maintenance Costs

Major maintenance costs incurred during generation plant outages are deferred and amortized into operating costs over the period between the major maintenance outages for the respective asset. Other routine costs of maintenance activities are charged to expense as incurred and reported as operating costs in our consolidated statements of operations.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans and OPEB Plans

On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed the pension and OPEB plans that Dynegy had provided to certain of its eligible employees and retirees. The excess of the benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets was recognized as a liability. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Merger.

Certain health care and life insurance benefits are offered to eligible employees and their dependents upon the retirement of such employeeemployees from the company. Pension benefits are offered to eligible employees under collective bargaining agreements based on either a traditional defined benefit formula or a cash balance formula. Costs of pension and OPEB plans are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates.

See Note 1718 for additional information regarding pension and OPEB plans.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The fair value of our non-qualified stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. We recognize compensation expense for graded vesting awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. See Note 1819 for additional information regarding stock-based compensation.

87

Table of Contents
Sales and Excise Taxes

Sales and excise taxes are accounted for as "pass through" items on the consolidated balance sheets with no effect on the consolidated statements of operations (i.e., the tax is billed to customers and recorded as trade accounts receivable with an offsetting amount recorded as a liability to the taxing jurisdiction in other current liabilities in our consolidated statements of operations).

101

Table of Contents
Franchise and Revenue-Based Taxes

Unlike sales and excise taxes, franchise and revenue-based taxes are not "pass through" items. These taxes are imposed on us by state and local taxing authorities, based on revenues or kWh delivered, as a cost of doing business and are recorded as an expense. Rates we charge to customers are intended to recover our costs, including the franchise and revenue-based receipt taxes, but we are not acting as an agent to collect the taxes from customers. We report franchise and revenue-based taxes in SG&A expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes

On the Merger Date, Vistra and Dynegy effected a merger transaction that for tax purposes was treated as a tax-free reorganization in which Vistra survived as the parent entity. In general, all of Dynegy's tax basis and attributes were transferred to Vistra, including approximately $4.5 billion of utilizable NOLs and refundable alternative minimum tax (AMT) tax credits.

Investment tax credits which are not transferable or refundable under the IRA are accounted for underusing the deferral method, which resulted in a reduction toreduces the basis of our solar and battery storage facilitiesfacilities. As of 0, $2 millionboth December 31, 2023 and $78 million and a corresponding increase in the2022, deferred tax assets in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.related to these credits totaled $70 million.

Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities as required under accounting rules. See Note 7.

We report interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. See Note 7.

Tax Receivable Agreement (TRA)

The Company accounts for its obligations under the TRA as a liability in our consolidated balance sheets (see Note 8). The carrying value of the TRA obligation represents the discounted amount of projected payments under the TRA. The projected payments are based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to (a) the federal corporate income tax rate, (b) estimates of our taxable income in the current and future years and (c) additional states that Vistra operates in, including the relevant tax rate and apportionment factor for each state. Our taxable income takes into consideration the current federal tax code and reflects our current estimates of future results of the business.

The carrying value of the obligation is being accreted to the amount of the gross expected obligation using the effective interest method. Changes in the estimated amount of this obligation resulting from changes to either the timing or amount of TRA payments are recognized in the period of change and measured using the discount rate inherent in the initial fair value of the obligation. These changes are included on our consolidated statements of operations under the heading of Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement.

Accounting for Contingencies

Our financial results may be affected by judgments and estimates related to loss contingencies. Accruals for loss contingencies are recorded when management determines that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and that such economic loss can be reasonably estimated. Such determinations are subject to interpretations of current facts and circumstances, forecasts of future events and estimates of the financial impacts of such events. See Note 1314 for a discussion of contingencies.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash and cash equivalents, temporary cash investments purchased with a remainingan original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

The terms of certain agreements require the restriction of cash for specific purposes. See Note 2122 for more details regarding restricted cash.

10288

Table of Contents
Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment has been recorded at estimated fair values at the time of acquisition for assets acquired or at cost for capital improvements and individual facilities developed (see Notes 2 andNote 3). Significant improvements or additions to our property, plant and equipment that extend the life of the respective asset are capitalized at cost, while other costs are expensed when incurred. The cost of self-constructed property additions includes materials and both direct and indirect labor, including payroll-related costs. Interest related to qualifying construction projects and qualifying software projects is capitalized in accordance with accounting guidance related to capitalization of interest cost. See Note 21.22.

Depreciation of our property, plant and equipment (except for nuclear fuel) is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the properties. Depreciation expense is calculated on an asset-by-asset basis. Estimated depreciable lives are based on management's estimates of the assets' economic useful lives. See Note 21.22.

Asset Retirement Obligations (ARO)

A liability is initially recorded at fair value for an asset retirement obligation associated with the legal obligation associated with law, regulatory, contractual or constructive retirement requirements of tangible long-lived assets in the period in which it is incurred if a fair value is reasonably estimable. At initial recognition of an ARO obligation, an offsetting asset is also recorded for the long-lived asset that the liability corresponds with, which is subsequently depreciated over the estimated useful life of the asset. These liabilities primarily relate to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining and removal of lignite/coal-fueled plant ash treatment facilities. Over time, the liability is accreted for the change in present value and the initial capitalized costs are depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the assets. Generally, changes in estimates related to ARO obligations are recorded as increases or decreases to the liability and related asset as information becomes available. Changes in estimates related to assets that have been retired or for which capitalized costs are not recoverable are recorded as operating costs in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 21.22.

Regulatory Asset or Liability

The costs to ultimately decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear power plant are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees. As a result, the asset retirement obligation and the investments in the decommissioning trust are accounted for as rate regulated operations. Changes in these accounts, including investment income and accretion expense, do not impact net income, but are reported as a change in the corresponding regulatory asset or liability balance that is reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as other noncurrent assets or other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits.

Inventories

Inventories consist of materials and supplies, fuel stock and natural gas in storage. Materials and supplies inventory is valued at weighted average cost and is expensed or capitalized when used for repairs/maintenance or capital projects, respectively. Fuel stock and natural gas in storage are reported at the lower of cost (calculated on a weighted average basis) or net realizable value. We expect to recover the value of inventory costs in the normal course of business. See Note 21.22.

Investments

Investments in a nuclear decommissioning trust fund are carried at current market value in the consolidated balance sheets. Assets related to employee benefit plans represent investments held to satisfy deferred compensation liabilities and are recorded at current market value. See Note 2122 for discussion of these and other investments.

Unconsolidated Investments

We use the equity method of accounting for investments in affiliates over which we exercise significant influence. Our share of net income from these affiliates is recorded to equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 21.

103

Table of Contents
Noncontrolling Interest

Noncontrolling interest is comprised of the 20% of Electric Energy, Inc. (EEI) that we do not own. EEI is our consolidated subsidiary that owns a coal facility in Joppa, Illinois. This noncontrolling interest is classified as a component of equity separate from stockholders' equity in the consolidated balance sheets.

Treasury Stock

Treasury stock purchases are accounted for under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock, which is presented in our consolidated balance sheets as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. Treasury stock purchases made by third party brokers on our behalf are recorded on a trade date basis when we are contractually obligated to pay the broker for their repurchase costs. See Note 14.15.

89

Table of Contents
Leases

At the inception of a contract we determine if it is or contains a lease, which involves the contract conveying the right to control the use of explicitly or implicitly identified property, plant, or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration.

Right-of-use (ROU) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at the commencement date of the underlying lease based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. We use our secured incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, operating lease liabilities (current) and operating lease liabilities (noncurrent) on our consolidated balance sheet. Finance leases are included in property, plant and equipment, other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits on our consolidated balance sheet. Lease term includes options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. We apply the practical expedient permitted by ASC 842, Leases to not separate lease and non-lease components for a majority of our lease asset classes.

Leases with an initial lease term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

We also present lessor sublease income on a net basis against the related lessee lease expense.

Adoption of Accounting Standards Issued Prior to 2020in 2023

Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures— In December 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740).The ASU enhances and simplifies various aspects of the income tax accounting guidance including the elimination of certain exceptions related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. We adopted all provisions of this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement — In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The ASU removes disclosure requirements for (a) the reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, (b) the policy for timing of transfers between levels and (c) the valuation processes for Level 3. The ASU requires new disclosures around (a) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (b) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and the updated disclosures are included in Note 15.

104

Table of Contents
Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract — In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The ASU requires a customer in a cloud hosting arrangement that is a service contract to determine which implementation costs to capitalize and which costs to expense based on the project stage of the implementation. The ASU also requires the customer to expense the capitalized implementation costs over the term of the hosting arrangement. The customer is required to apply the existing impairment and abandonment guidance on the capitalized implementation costs. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Financial Instruments—Credit Losses — In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses. The ASU requires organizations to measure all expected credit losses for financial instruments held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. We adopted this ASU in the first quarter of 2020, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Leases — On January 1, 2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) and all related amendments (new lease standard) using the modified retrospective method with the cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained deficit for all contracts outstanding at the time of adoption. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. We expect the impact of the adoption of the new lease standard to be immaterial to our net income on an ongoing basis. The impact of adopting the new lease standard primarily relates to recognition of lease liabilities and ROU assets for all leases classified as operating leases. Under the new lease standard, each ROU asset will be amortized over the lease term and liability settled at the end of the lease term. We recognized the effect of initially applying the new lease standard by recording ROU assets of $85 million and lease liabilities of $123 million in our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 12 for the disclosures required by the new lease standard.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans In August 2018,November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2018-14,No. 2023-07, ChangesSegment Reporting (Topic 280), Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, to improve the disclosures about reportable segments and add more detailed information about a reportable segment's expenses. The amendments in the ASU require public entities to disclose on an annual and interim basis significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. The ASU removes disclosure requirements for (a)chief operating decision maker (CODM) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss, other segment items by reportable segment, the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year, (b) related party disclosures about the amount of future annual benefits covered by insurancetitle and annuity contracts and significant transactions between the employer or related parties and the plan and (c) the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the aggregateposition of the serviceCODM, and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs and benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits. The ASU requires new disclosures for (a) the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates and (b) an explanation of how the reasonsCODM uses the reported measures of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. The ASU does not change the definition of a segment, the method for significant gains and losses relateddetermining segments, the criteria for aggregating operating segments into reportable segments, or the current specifically enumerated segment expenses that are required to changesbe disclosed. The Company will adopt the amendments in the benefit obligation for the period. We adopted this ASU infor its fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and interim periods within its fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. The amendment will be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. We are currently evaluating the fourth quarter of 2018,impact this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements and the updated disclosures are included in Note 17.related disclosures.

Reclassification of CertainImprovements to Income Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income DisclosuresIn February 2018,December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02,No. 2023-09 (ASU 2023-09), Reclassification of CertainIncome Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeDisclosures. The ASU permits to enhance the reclassificationtransparency and decision usefulness of income tax effects ofdisclosures. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024 on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. As the TCJAamendments apply to income tax disclosures only, the Company does not expect adoption to have a material impact on items within accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to retained earnings. We adopted this ASU in the fourth quarter of 2018, and the impact was additional tax expense to AOCI of $1 million with the offset to retained deficit (see Note 7).our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers On January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and all related amendments (new revenue standard) using the modified retrospective method for all contracts outstanding at the time of adoption. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained deficit. The impact of the adoption of the revenue standard was immaterial and we expect the adoption to continue to be immaterial to our net income on an ongoing basis. Our retail energy charges and wholesale generation, capacity and contract revenues will continue to be recognized when electricity and other services are delivered to our customers. The impact of adopting the revenue standard primarily relates to the deferral of acquisition costs associated with retail contracts with customers that were previously expensed as incurred. Under the revenue standard, these amounts are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the customer.

105

Table of Contents
Adoption of Accounting Standards Issued in 2020Prior to 2023

Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The ASU provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another rate that is expected to be discontinued. The amendments in the ASU arewere effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In March 2020, the SEC amended Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X regarding financial disclosure requirements for registered debt offerings involving subsidiaries as either issuers or guarantors and affiliates whose securities are pledged as collateral. This new guidance narrows the circumstances that require separate financial statements of subsidiary issuers and guarantors and streamlines the alternative disclosures required in lieu of those statements. This rule is effective January 4, 2021 with earlier adoption permitted. We elected to adopt this rule in the first quarter of 2020. Accordingly, summarized financial information has been presented only for the issuer and guarantors of the Company's registered debt securities, and the location of the required disclosures has been moved outside the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and is provided in Part II, Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Financial Condition Guarantor Summary Financial Information. In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-09, Debt (Topic 470) Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-10762, to reflect the SEC's new disclosure rules on guaranteed debt securities adopted by the Company.


2.ACQUISITIONS, MERGER TRANSACTION AND BUSINESS COMBINATION ACCOUNTING

Ambit Transaction

On November 1, 2019 (Ambit Acquisition Date), Volt Asset Company, Inc., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the Ambit Transaction. Ambit is an energy retailer selling both electricity and natural gas products to residential and small business customers in 17 states. Vistra funded the purchase price of $555 million (including cash acquired and net working capital) using cash on hand. All of Ambit's outstanding debt was repaid from the purchase price at closing and not assumed by Vistra.

Crius Transaction

On July 15, 2019 (Crius Acquisition Date), Vienna Acquisition B.C. Ltd., an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra, completed the acquisition of the equity interests of two wholly owned subsidiaries of Crius that indirectly own the operating business of Crius. Crius is an energy retailer selling both electricity and natural gas products to residential and small business customers in 19 states. Vistra funded the purchase price of $400 million (including $382 million for outstanding trust units) using cash on hand. In addition, Vistra assumed $140 million of outstanding debt and acquired $26 million of cash at the closing of the Crius Transaction. See Note 11 for discussion of debt assumed in the Crius Transaction.

Ambit and Crius Business Combination Accounting

We believe the Ambit Transaction has (i) augmented Vistra's existing retail marketing capabilities with additional direct selling capability and a proprietary technology platform, (ii) reduced risk and aided expansion into higher margin channels by improving Vistra's match of its generation to load profile due to a high degree of overlap of Vistra's generation fleet with Ambit's approximately 11 TWh of annual load, primarily in ERCOT and PJM and (iii) enhanced the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Ambit's retail electric portfolio.

We believe the Crius Transaction has (i) reduced risk and aided expansion into higher margin channels by improving Vistra's match of its generation to load profile due to a high degree of overlap of Vistra's generation fleet with Crius' approximately 10 TWh of annual electricity load, (ii) established a platform for growth by leveraging Vistra's existing retail marketing capabilities and Crius' experienced team and (iii) enhanced the integrated value proposition through collateral and transaction efficiencies, particularly via Crius' retail electric portfolio.

10690

Table of Contents
EachIn December 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-06, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Deferral of the Ambit TransactionSunset Date of Topic 848,which deferred the sunset date of Topic 848 from December 31, 2022 to December 31, 2024. The expedients and Crius Transaction, respectively, was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values onexceptions may be elected over time as reference rate reform activities occur through the Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. The combined results of operationssunset date. We have applied the optional expedients to amendments to financial instruments that now reference the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR). Additionally, we have identified the financial instruments to which the expedients could be applied, if deemed necessary, as amendments to these financial instruments are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as ofmade through the respective Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date. A summary of the techniques used to estimate the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as their classification within the fair value hierarchy (see Note 15), is listed below:sunset date.

Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance
Working capital was valued using available market information (Level 2).
In November 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU 2021-10, Acquired derivatives were valued usingGovernment Assistance (Topic 832) Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance. This standard requires additional annual disclosures when a business receives government assistance and uses a grant or contribution accounting model by analogy to other accounting guidance such as the methods describedgrant model under International Accounting Standards 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosures of Government Assistance (IAS 20) and GAAP ASC 958-605, Not-for-Profit Entities - Revenue Recognition. The standard was effective January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. As further discussed in Note 15 (Level 2 or Level 3).
1, we made disclosures in accordance with this guidance when accounting for the Acquired retail customer relationship was valued based on discounted cash flow analysis of acquired customers and estimated attrition rates (Level 3).
Crius' long-term debt was valued using a market approach (Level 2).Uplift Securitization Proceeds from ERCOT.

The following table summarizesDue to the allocationenactment of the purchase price toIRA, the fair value amounts recognizedCompany qualifies for tax incentives through eligible construction spending and production. These tax incentives generally provide for refundable or transferable tax credits upon the applicable qualifying event for the assets acquiredcredit type, typically production or in-service date. Transferable and liabilities assumed related to the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction, respectively, as of the Ambit Acquisition Date and Crius Acquisition Date, respectively. The Ambit Transaction purchase price was $555 million (including cash acquired and net working capital) and the Crius Transaction purchase price was $400 million. The final purchase price allocations were completedrefundable PTCs are included in other noncurrent assets in the second quarter of 2020 for the Crius Transactionconsolidated balance sheet and the third quarter of 2020 for the Ambit Transaction.
Ambit Transaction and Crius Transactions Final Purchase Price Allocations
Ambit TransactionCrius Transaction
Final
Purchase Price
Allocation
Measurement Period Adjustments recorded through September 30, 2020Final
Purchase Price
Allocation
Measurement Period Adjustments recorded through June 30, 2020
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $$26 $
Net working capital32 (9)(42)
Accumulated deferred income taxes(36)
Identifiable intangible assets218 (45)317 23 
Goodwill258 44 243 38 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets23 18 
Other noncurrent assets13 17 (3)
Total assets acquired593 612 (20)
Identifiable intangible liabilities(34)
Long-term debt, including amounts due currently140 
Commodity and other derivative contractual liabilities28 40 
Accumulated deferred income taxes14 14 
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits10 16 
Total liabilities assumed38 212 (20)
Identifiable net assets acquired$555 $$400 $

Acquisition costs incurredincluded in revenues in the Ambit Transaction and Crius Transaction totaled $1 million and $2 million, respectively. For the Ambit Acquisition Date through December 31, 2019, our consolidated statements of operations include revenueswhen receipt of the credit is reasonably assured. Transferable investment tax credits (ITCs) are included in other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding reduction to the cost basis of the Company's plant assets when receipt of the credit is reasonably assured, and net income acquiredreduces depreciation expense over the life of the asset. We believe the reasonable assurance term as used in IAS 20 is analogous to the term probable as defined in ASC 450-20 of U.S. GAAP. The Company accounts for the credits we expect to receive by analogy to the grant model within IAS 20, as U.S. GAAP does not address how to account for these tax credits.

2.TRANSACTION AGREEMENT

On March 6, 2023, Vistra Operations and Merger Sub entered into the Transaction Agreement with Energy Harbor pursuant to which, upon the terms and subject to the conditions thereof, Merger Sub will be merged with and into Energy Harbor, with Energy Harbor surviving as an indirect subsidiary of Vistra. The Transaction Agreement, the Merger and the other Transactions were approved by each of Vistra's Board and Energy Harbor's board of directors.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement, prior to the consummation of the Merger, Vistra will cause certain of its affiliates to transfer certain of its affiliate entities, including Merger Sub, to an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Vistra (Vistra Vision).

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Transaction Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (Effective Time), the issued and outstanding shares of Energy Harbor common stock other than shares that are being exchanged by certain funds and accounts managed by Nuveen Asset Management LLC and certain funds managed by Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. (Rollover Holders) for 15% of the direct or indirect equity interests in Vistra Vision, and certain other shares, each as specified in the Ambit Transaction totaling $193 millionAgreement and $2 million, respectively. For the Crius Acquisition Date through December 31, 2019, our consolidated statements of operations include revenuesContribution and net income acquiredExchange Agreements (as defined below) will be cancelled and extinguished and automatically converted into the right to receive cash consideration per share payable in the CriusMerger. Vistra's transfer of cash and equity in Vistra Vision in exchange for the issued and outstanding shares of Energy Harbor common stock will be covered under the non-recognition provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The Aggregate Base Transaction totaling $453 million and 0, respectively. The net income acquiredValue is defined in the Ambit Transaction Agreement to be (a) the Aggregate Cash Consideration Value (defined in the Transaction Agreement to be $3.0 billion), plus (b) for the 15% equity in Vistra Vision, the Aggregate Equity Consideration Value (defined in the Transaction Agreement to be $3.333 billion for the purpose of determining the amount per share to be distributed to Energy Harbor's stockholders), minus (c) certain adjustments as specified in the Transaction Agreement. In addition, in connection with the Merger, Energy Harbor's equity awards will be cancelled for cash based on the per share Merger consideration for the shares underlying such equity awards and CriusEnergy Harbor's stockholders (including Rollover Holders and holders of Energy Harbor equity awards) will receive an additional amount of cash paid from Energy Harbor to the extent of Energy Harbor's unrestricted cash on hand as of the closing, subject to certain adjustments as specified in the Transaction include intangible amortization and transition relatedAgreement. In addition, Vistra Operations will pay up to $100 million of Energy Harbor's transaction expenses.

10791

Table of Contents
Ambit and Crius Transaction Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information — The following unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information forOn February 16, 2024, we received approval from FERC to acquire Energy Harbor, which was the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 assumes thatlast regulatory approval needed to close the Ambit and Crius Transactions occurred on January 1, 2018 (i.e., represents our results for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 plus the results for either Ambit Transaction or Crius Transaction for the period not owned by us, respectively). The unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information is provided for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicativeacquisition. Consummation of the results of operations that would have occurred had the Ambit TransactionTransactions is subject to customary closing conditions, and Crius Transaction been completedwe anticipate closing on JanuaryMarch 1, 2018, nor is the unaudited consolidated pro forma financial information indicative of future results of operations, which may differ materially from the consolidated pro forma financial information presented here.
Ambit TransactionCrius Transaction
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2019201820192018
Revenues$12,931 $10,446 $12,373 $10,379 
Net income (loss) (a)$949 $(95)$876 $(43)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra$951 $(93)$878 $(41)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$1.92 $(0.18)$1.78 $(0.08)
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$1.90 $(0.18)$1.76 $(0.08)
__________
(a)Decrease in pro forma net income compared to consolidated net income is driven by unrealized losses on hedging activities of Crius and amortization of intangible assets.2024.

The consolidated unaudited pro forma financial information presented above includes adjustmentsVistra Vision will combine Energy Harbor's nuclear and retail businesses with Vistra's nuclear and retail businesses and certain of the Vistra Zero renewables and energy storage projects. This combination is expected to create a leading integrated retail electricity and zero-carbon generation company with the second-largest competitive nuclear fleet in the U.S., along with a growing renewables and energy storage portfolio. This transaction is expected to accelerate Vistra's path to a clean energy transition by more than doubling the amount of zero-carbon generation it has online at the time of the Transactions' closing.

Financing Arrangements

In connection with the Transactions, in March 2023, Vistra Operations entered into a debt commitment letter (Commitment Letter) and related fee letters with various lenders (Commitment Parties), pursuant to which, and subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, the Commitment Parties committed to provide (a) up to approximately $3.0 billion in an aggregate principal amount of senior secured bridge loans under a 364-day senior secured bridge loan credit facility (Acquisition Bridge Facility), (b) in the event Vistra Operations did not obtain certain required consents and amendments from the lenders under the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement, a 364-day senior secured term loan B bridge facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to approximately $2.5 billion (TLB Refinancing Bridge Facility) and (c) in the event Vistra Operations did not obtain certain required consents and amendments from the lenders under the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement, a replacement commodity-linked revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount up to $300 million (Refinancing Commodity-Linked Revolving Credit Facility). Vistra Operations subsequently obtained commitments from the lenders under the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement and Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement to provide the required consents and amendments which resulted in the termination of the commitments for incremental depreciationeach of the TLB Refinancing Bridge Facility and amortizationthe Refinancing Commodity-Linked Revolving Credit Facility. In September 2023, the Acquisition Bridge Facility was terminated as a result of the fair value determinationissuance of the net assets acquired and the related impacts on tax expense.

Dynegy Merger Transaction

On the Merger Date, Vistra and Dynegy completed the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Dynegy merged with and into Vistra, with Vistra continuing as the surviving corporation. The Merger was intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under the IRC, so that none$1.75 billion of Vistra, Dynegy or any of the Dynegy stockholders would recognize any gain or loss in the transaction, except that Dynegy stockholders could recognize a gain or loss with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Vistra's common stock. Vistra is the acquirer for both federal tax and accounting purposes.

On the Merger Date, each issued and outstanding share of Dynegy common stock, par value $0.01 per share, other than shares owned by Vistra or its subsidiaries, held in treasury by Dynegy or held by a subsidiary of Dynegy, was automatically converted into 0.652 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Vistra (the Exchange Ratio), except that cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares, which resulted in Vistra issuing 94,409,573 shares of Vistra common stock to the former Dynegy stockholders, as well as converting stock options, equity-based awards, tangible equity units and warrants. The total number of Vistra shares outstanding at the close of the Merger was 522,932,453 shares. Dynegy stock options and equity-based awards outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Date were generally automatically converted upon completion of the Merger into stock options and equity-based awards, respectively, with respect to Vistra's common stock, after giving effect to the Exchange Ratio.

Dynegy Business Combination Accounting

We believe the Merger has provided and continues to provide significant strategic benefits and opportunities to Vistra, including increased scale and market diversification, rebalanced asset portfolio and improved earnings and cash flows. The Merger was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), with identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded at their estimated fair values on the Merger Date. The combined results of operations are reported in our consolidated financial statements beginning as of the Merger Date. A summary of the techniques used to estimate the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as their classification within the fair value hierarchy (see Note 15), is listed below:

Working capital was valued using available market information (Level 2).
108

Table of Contents
Acquired property, plant and equipment was valued using a combination of an income approachsenior secured and a market approach. The income approach utilized a discountedsenior unsecured notes by Vistra Operations in September 2023 that are expected to be used, together with cash flow analysis based upon a debt-free, free cash flow model (Level 3).
Acquired derivatives were valued usingon hand, to fund the methods described in Note 15 (Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3).
Contracts with terms that were not at current market prices were also valued using a discounted cash flow analysis (Level 3). The cash flows generated by the contracts were compared with their cash flows based on current market prices with the resulting difference discounted to present value and recorded as either an intangible asset or liability.
Long-term debt was valued using a market approach (Level 2).
AROs were recorded in accordance with ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations (Level 3).

The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the final allocation of the purchase price to the fair value amounts recognized for the assets acquired and liabilities assumedTransactions. Fees related to the Merger as of the Merger Date. Based on the opening price of Vistra common stock on the Merger Date, the purchase price was approximately $2.3 billion. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the purchase price allocation was completed. During the period from April 9, 2018 through March 31, 2019, we updated the initial purchase price allocation with final valuations by increasing property, plant and equipment by $173Commitment Letter totaled $21 million decreasing intangible assets by $36 million, increasing goodwill by $175 million, decreasing accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets by $10 million, increasing accumulated deferred tax asset by $127 million, decreasing other noncurrent assets by $113 million, increasing trade accounts payable and other current liabilities by $89 million, increasing other noncurrent liabilities by $177 million, increasing asset retirement obligations, including amounts due currently by $56 million as well as other minor adjustments. The valuation revisions were a result of updated inputs used in determining the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities.

Dynegy shares outstanding as of April 9, 2018 (in millions)144.8 
Exchange Ratio0.652 
Vistra shares issued for Dynegy shares outstanding (in millions)94.4 
Opening price of Vistra common stock on April 9, 2018$19.87 
Purchase price for common stock$1,876 
Fair value of equity component of tangible equity units369 
Fair value of outstanding stock compensation awards attributable to pre-combination service26 
Fair value of outstanding warrants
Total purchase price$2,273 


Dynegy Merger Final Purchase Price Allocation
Cash and cash equivalents$445 
Trade accounts receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets853 
Property, plant and equipment10,535 
Accumulated deferred income taxes518 
Identifiable intangible assets351 
Goodwill175 
Other noncurrent assets419 
Total assets acquired13,296 
Trade accounts payable and other current liabilities733 
Commodity and other derivative contractual assets and liabilities, net422 
Asset retirement obligations, including amounts due currently475 
Long-term debt, including amounts due currently8,919 
Other noncurrent liabilities469 
Total liabilities assumed11,018 
Identifiable net assets acquired2,278 
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary
Total purchase price$2,273 

109

Table of Contents
Acquisition costs incurred in the Merger totaled less than $1 million and $25 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. For the period from the Merger Date through December 31, 2018, our consolidated statements of operations include revenues and net income (loss) acquired in the Merger totaling $3.902 billion and $224 million respectively.

Dynegy Merger Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information — The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the year ended December 31, 2018 assumes that the Merger occurred on January 1, 2018. The unaudited pro forma financial information is provided for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the Merger been completed on January 1, 2018, nor is the unaudited pro forma financial information indicative of future results of operations,2023 which may differ materially from the pro forma financial information presented here.
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Revenues$10,595 
Net loss$(268)
Net loss attributable to Vistra$(265)
Net loss attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$(0.52)
Net loss attributable to Vistra per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$(0.52)

The unaudited pro forma financial information presented above includes adjustments for incremental depreciation and amortizationwere classified as a result of the fair value determination of the net assets acquired, interest expense on debt assumedand related charges in the Merger, effectsconsolidated statement of the Merger on tax expense (benefit), changes in the expected impacts of the tax receivable agreement due to the Merger, and other related adjustments.
operations.

11092

Table of Contents
3.ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIES

Texas Segment Solar Generation and Energy Storage Projects

In connection with our previously announced renewable development plans in Texas, 158 MW of solar generation came online in January and February 2022 and 260 MW of battery ESS came online in April 2022. Estimated commercial operation dates for the remaining facilities to be developed are expected to be 2025 and beyond, but we will only invest in growth projects if we are confident that the expected returns will meet or exceed internal targets. As of December 31, 2023, we had accumulated approximately $200 million in construction-work-in-process for these remaining Texas segment solar generation projects.

East Segment Solar Generation and Energy Storage Projects

In September 2020,2021, we announced the planned development of up to 668300 MW of solar photovoltaic power generation facilities and 260up to 150 MW of battery ESS at retired or to-be-retired plant sites in Texas.Illinois, based on the passage of Illinois Senate Bill 2408, the Energy Transition Act. Estimated commercial operation dates for these facilities range from Summer 20212024 to Fall 2022.

Upton 2Phase I — In May 2017,2026. As of December 31, 2023, we acquired the rights to develop, constructhad accumulated approximately $66 million in construction-work-in-process for these East segment solar generation and operate a utility scale solar photovoltaic power generation facility in Upton County, Texas (Upton 2). As part of this project, we entered into a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction agreement to construct the approximately 180 MW facility. We spent approximately $231 million related to this project primarily for progress payments under the engineering, procurement and construction agreement and the acquisition of the development rights. The facility began test operations in March 2018 and commercial operations began in June 2018.

Upton 2 Phase II — In 2018, we completed the construction of our first battery energy storage system (ESS). In October 2018, we were awarded a $1 million grant from the TCEQ for our battery ESS at our Upton 2 solar facility. The grant is part of the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan. The 10 MW lithium-ion ESS captures excess solar energy produced during the day and releases the energy in late afternoon and early evening, when demand is highest. The Upton 2 Phase II battery ESS became operational in December 2018.projects.

West Segment Energy Storage Projects

Oakland — In June 2019, East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) signed a ten-year contract to receive resource adequacy capacity from the planned development of a 20 MW battery ESS at our Oakland Power Plant site in California. In April 2020, the project received necessary approvals from EBCE and from Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). The contract was amended to increase the capacity of the planned development to a 36.25 MW battery ESS. In April 2020, the concurrent local area reliability service agreement to ensure grid reliability as part of the Oakland Clean Energy Initiative was signed and sent to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for approval, which is expected prior to the second quarter of 2021. The battery ESS project is expected to enter commercial operations by January 2022.Moss Landing

Moss LandingIn June 2018, we announced that, subject to approval by the CPUC, we would enter into a 20-year resource adequacy contract with PG&E to develop a 300 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site in California (Moss Landing Phase I). PG&E filed its application with the CPUC in June 2018 and theThe CPUC approved the resource adequacy contract in November 2018. At December 31, 2020, we had accumulated approximately $370 million in construction work-in-process for Moss Landing Phase I. Under the contract, PG&E will pay us a fixed monthly resource adequacy payment, while we will receive the energy revenues and incur the costs from dispatching and charging the battery ESS. Moss Landing Phase I began testcommenced commercial operations in December 2020 and is expected to be fully operational by AprilMay 2021. PG&E filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2019. In November 2019, the bankruptcy court approved PG&E's motion requesting approval of the assumption of the resource adequacy contract subject to the CPUC approving the terms of an amendment to the resource adequacy contract, and the CPUC approved the terms of the amendment in January 2020. PG&E emerged from bankruptcy protection in July 2020.

In May 2020, we announced that, subject to approval by the CPUC, we would enter into a 10-year resource adequacy contract with PG&E to develop an additional 100 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site (Moss Landing Phase II). PG&E filed its application with the CPUC in May 2020 and theThe CPUC approved the resource adequacy contract in August 2020. At December 31, 2020, we had accumulated approximately $29 million in construction work-in-process for Moss Landing Phase II. We anticipate Moss Landing Phase II will commencecommenced commercial operations in the third quarter ofJuly 2021.

In January 2022, we announced that, subject to approval by the CPUC, we would enter into a 15-year resource adequacy and energy settlement contract with PG&E to develop an additional 350 MW battery ESS at our Moss Landing Power Plant site (Moss Landing Phase III). The CPUC approved the resource adequacy and energy settlement contract in April 2022. Moss Landing Phase III commenced commercial operations in June 2023. As a result of reaching commercial operations, we recognized $154 million of transferable ITCs associated with the project within other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

Moss Landing Outages

In September 2021, Moss Landing Phase I experienced an incident impacting a portion of the battery ESS. A review found the root cause originated in systems separate from the battery system. The facility was offline as we performed the work necessary to return the facility to service. Restoration work on the facility was completed in June 2022. Moss Landing Phases II and III were not affected by this incident.

In February 2022, Moss Landing Phase II experienced an incident impacting a portion of the battery ESS. A review found the root cause originated in systems separate from the battery system. The facility was offline as we performed the work necessary to return the facility to service. Restoration work on the facility was completed in September 2022. Moss Landing Phases I and III were not affected by this incident.

These incidents did not have a material impact on our results of operations.

111
93

Table of Contents

4.RETIREMENT OF GENERATION FACILITIES

2020 Announcements

In December 2020, weOperational results for plants with defined retirement dates are included in our Sunset segment beginning in the quarter when a retirement plan is announced our intentionand move to retire 2 natural gas facilities in Texas duethe Asset Closure segment at the beginning of the calendar year the retirement is expected to their age, cost profile and small scale, as well as low power prices, limited operational windows and substantial costs to repair, maintain and upgrade the facilities.occur.
NameFacilityLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Dates Units RetiredActual or
Expected Retirement Date (a)(b)
Segment
WhartonBaldwinBaldwin, ILBoling,MISOCoal1,185By the end of 2025Sunset
Coleto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTCoal650By the end of 2027Sunset
KincaidKincaid, ILPJMCoal1,108By the end of 2027Sunset
Miami FortNorth Bend, OHPJMCoal1,020By the end of 2027Sunset
NewtonNewton, ILMISO/PJMCoal615By the end of 2027Sunset
EdwardsBartonville, ILMISOCoal585Retired January 1, 2023Asset Closure
JoppaJoppa, ILMISOCoal802Retired September 1, 2022Asset Closure
JoppaJoppa, ILMISONatural Gas83221Retired September 1, 2022November 30, 2020Asset Closure
TrinidadZimmerTrinidad, TXMoscow, OHERCOTPJMNatural GasCoal2441,300Retired June 1, 2022By April 30, 2021Asset Closure
Total3277,486
____________
(a)Generation facilities may retire earlier than expected dates disclosed if economic or other conditions dictate.
(b)Retirement dates represent the first full day in which a plant does not operate.

In September 2020 and December 2020, we announced our intention to retire all of our remaining coal generation facilities in Illinois and Ohio, 1one coal generation facility in Texas and 1one natural gas facility in Illinois no later than year-end 2027 due to economic challenges, including incremental expenditures that would be required to comply with the CCR rule and ELG rule (see Note 13)14), and in furtherance of our efforts to significantly reduce our carbon footprint. ExpectedAs previously announced in April 2021, we retired the Joppa generation facilities in September 2022 in order to settle a complaint filed with the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB) by the Sierra Club in 2018. As previously announced in July 2021, we retired the Zimmer coal generation facility in June 2022 due to the inability to secure capacity revenues for the plant retirement expenses of $43 million, driven by severance cost, were accrued in the year ended December 31, 2020PJM capacity auction held in operating costs of our Sunset segment. Operational results for plants with planned retirements are included in our Sunset segment beginning in the quarter when a retirement plan is announced. May 2021.

See Note 2122 for discussion of impairments recorded in connection with these announcements.
NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Expected Retirement Date (a)
BaldwinBaldwin, ILMISOCoal1,185By the end of 2025
Coleto CreekGoliad, TXERCOTCoal650By the end of 2027
JoppaJoppa, ILMISOCoal802By the end of 2025
JoppaJoppa, ILMISONatural Gas221By the end of 2025
KincaidKincaid, ILPJMCoal1,108By the end of 2027
Miami FortNorth Bend, OHPJMCoal1,020By the end of 2027
NewtonNewton, ILMISO/PJMCoal615By the end of 2027
ZimmerMoscow, OHPJMCoal1,300By the end of 2027
Total6,901
____________
(a)Generation facilities may retire earlier than expected dates if economic or other conditions dictate.

2019 Announcements

In September 2019, we announced the settlement of a lawsuit alleging violations of opacity and particulate matter limits at our Edwards facility in Bartonville, Illinois. As part of the settlement, which was approved by the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois in November 2019, we will retire the Edwards facility by the end of 2022 (see Note 13). In August 2019, we announced the planned retirement of 4 additional power plants in Illinois with a total installed nameplate generation capacity of 2,068 MW. We retired these units due to changes in the Illinois multi-pollutant standard rule (MPS rule) that require us to retire approximately 2,000 MW of generation capacity (see Note 13). In light of the provisions of the Federal Power Act and the FERC regulations thereunder, the affected subsidiaries of Vistra identified the retired units by analyzing the economics of each of our Illinois plants and designating the least economic units for retirement. Expected plant retirement expenses of $47 million, driven by severance costs, were accrued in the year ended December 31, 2019 and were included primarily in operating costs of our Asset Closure segment. In August 2019, we remeasured our pension and OPEB plans resulting in an increase to the benefit obligation liability of $21 million, pretax other comprehensive loss of $18 million and curtailment expense of $3 million recognized as other deductions in our consolidated statements of operations. The following table details the units in Illinois totaling 2,653 MW that have been or will be retired. Operational results for the four retired plants identified below are included in the Asset Closure segment, which is engaged in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. Operational results for the Edwards facility are included in the Sunset segment.
112

Table of Contents

NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Dates Units Retired or
Expected Retirement Date
CoffeenCoffeen, ILMISOCoal915 November 1, 2019
Duck CreekCanton, ILMISOCoal425 December 15, 2019
HavanaHavana, ILMISOCoal434 November 1, 2019
HennepinHennepin, ILMISOCoal294 November 1, 2019
EdwardsBartonville, ILMISOCoal585 By the end of 2022
Total2,653 

2018 Announcements

In August 2018, we filed a notice of suspension of operation with PJM and other mandatory regulatory notifications related to the retirement of our 51 MW Northeastern Power Company waste coal facility in McAdoo, Pennsylvania (Northeastern Facility). We decided to retire the Northeastern Facility due to its uneconomic operations and financial outlook. Following the receipt of regulatory approvals, the Northeastern Facility was retired in October 2018. The decision to retire the Northeastern Facility did not result in a material impact to the financial statements, and the operational results of the Northeastern Facility are included in our Asset Closure segment.

NaN of our non-operated, jointly held power plants acquired in the Merger, for which our proportional generation capacity was 883 MW, were retired in May 2018. These units were retired as previously scheduled. No gain or loss was recorded in conjunction with the retirement of these units, and the operational results of these facilities are included in our Asset Closure segment. The following table details the units retired.
NameLocationISO/RTOFuel TypeNet Generation Capacity (MW)Ownership InterestDate Units Retired
KillenManchester, OhioPJMCoal204 33%May 31, 2018
StuartAberdeen, OhioPJMCoal679 39%May 24, 2018
Total883 

In January and February 2018, we retired 3 power plants in Texas with a total installed nameplate generation capacity of 4,167 MW. We decided to retire these units because they were projected to be uneconomic based on then current market conditions and would have faced significant environmental costs associated with operating such units. In the case of the Sandow units, the decision also reflected the execution of a contract termination agreement pursuant to which the Company and Alcoa agreed to an early settlement of a long-standing power and mining agreement. Expected retirement expenses were accrued in the third and fourth quarter of 2017 and, as a result, no retirement expenses were recorded related to these facilities in the year ended December 31, 2018. The operational results of these facilities are included in our Asset Closure segment. The following table details the units retired.
NameLocation (all in the state of Texas)ISO/RTOFuel TypeInstalled Nameplate Generation Capacity (MW)Date Units Retired
MonticelloTitus CountyERCOTLignite/Coal1,880 January 4, 2018
SandowMilam CountyERCOTLignite1,137 January 11, 2018
Big BrownFreestone CountyERCOTLignite/Coal1,150 February 12, 2018
Total4,167 
determinations.

11394

Table of Contents
5.REVENUE

Revenue Disaggregation

The following tables disaggregate our revenue by major source:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2023
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT
Retail energy charge in ERCOT
Retail energy charge in ERCOTRetail energy charge in ERCOT$5,813 $$$$$$$5,813 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/MidwestRetail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest2,406 2,406 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTOWholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO475 310 124 473 1,383 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO (a)Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO (a)(52)164 112 
Revenue from other wholesale contractsRevenue from other wholesale contracts226 668 54 187 1,136 
Total revenue from contracts with customersTotal revenue from contracts with customers8,219 701 926 178 824 10,850 
Other revenues:Other revenues:
Intangible amortizationIntangible amortization(5)(21)(24)
Intangible amortization
Intangible amortization
Transferable PTC revenues
Hedging and other revenues (b)Hedging and other revenues (b)56 416 (108)101 151 617 
Affiliate sales(c)Affiliate sales(c)2,999 1,595 298 (4,895)
Total other revenuesTotal other revenues51 3,415 1,489 104 428 (4,895)593 
Total revenuesTotal revenues$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $$(4,895)$11,443 
____________
(a)Represents net capacity sold (purchased) in each ISO/RTO. The East segment includes net purchases$157 million of capacity in the PJM market and thesold offset by $100 million of capacity purchased. The Sunset segment includes net sales$76 million of capacity in the PJM market.sold offset by $35 million of capacity purchased.
(b)Includes $164$714 million of unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for
For the year endedRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and OtherEliminations (1)Consolidated
December 31, 2023$191 $(758)$1,165 $237 $603 $36 $— $(760)$714 
____________
(1) Amounts attributable to generation segments offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(c)East and Sunset segments include $641 million and $187 million, respectively, of affiliated unrealized net gains, (losses) byand Texas segment includes $62 million of affiliated unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions with the Retail segment.


Year Ended December 31, 2019
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$4,983 $$$$$$$4,983 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest1,818 1,818 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO1,477 629 193 751 194 3,244 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO170 197 11 378 
Revenue from other wholesale contracts264 702 147 1,124 
Total revenue from contracts with customers6,801 1,741 1,501 202 1,095 207 11,547 
Other revenues:
Intangible amortization(15)(4)(17)(32)
Hedging and other revenues (a)86 (250)37 132 247 42 294 
Affiliate sales2,345 1,256 277 92 (3,970)
Total other revenues71 2,095 1,289 136 507 134 (3,970)262 
Total revenues$6,872 $3,836 $2,790 $338 $1,602 $341 $(3,970)$11,809 
____________
(a)Includes $682 million of unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for unrealized net gains (losses) by segment.
11495

Table of Contents


Year Ended December 31, 2018
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Year Ended December 31, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2022
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT
Retail energy charge in ERCOT
Retail energy charge in ERCOTRetail energy charge in ERCOT$4,426 $$$$$$$4,426 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/MidwestRetail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest1,123 1,123 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTOWholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO1,049 867 167 825 218 3,126 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO376 30 258 34 698 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO (a)
Revenue from other wholesale contractsRevenue from other wholesale contracts214 67 137 424 
Total revenue from contracts with customersTotal revenue from contracts with customers5,549 1,263 1,310 203 1,220 252 9,797 
Other revenues:Other revenues:
Intangible amortizationIntangible amortization(26)(1)(9)(7)(43)
Hedging and other revenues (a)74 (387)16 (214)(106)(610)
Affiliate sales1,622 578 184 225 (2,609)
Intangible amortization
Intangible amortization
Hedging and other revenues (b)
Affiliate sales (c)
Total other revenuesTotal other revenues48 1,234 585 (37)119 (2,607)(653)
Total revenuesTotal revenues$5,597 $2,497 $1,895 $208 $1,183 $371 $(2,607)$9,144 
____________
(a)Represents net capacity sold (purchased) in each ISO/RTO. The East segment includes $302 million of capacity sold offset by $282 million of capacity purchased. The Sunset segment includes $59 million of capacity sold offset by $3 million of capacity purchased. The Asset Closure segment includes $27 million of capacity sold.
(b)Includes $380 million$2.163 billion of unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions. See Note 20 for
For the year endedRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and OtherEliminations (1)Consolidated
December 31, 2022(532)(1,472)(757)(324)(3)106 — 819 (2,163)
____________
(1) Amounts attributable to generation segments offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(c)Texas and East segments include $817 million and $38 million, respectively, of affiliated unrealized net losses, and Sunset and Asset Closure segment includes $30 million and $4 million, respectively, of affiliated unrealized net gains (losses)from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions with the Retail segment.

96

Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31, 2021
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureEliminationsConsolidated
Revenue from contracts with customers:
Retail energy charge in ERCOT$5,733 $— $— $— $— $— $— $5,733 
Retail energy charge in Northeast/Midwest2,255 — — — — — — 2,255 
Wholesale generation revenue from ISO/RTO— 3,808 786 229 1,050 475 — 6,348 
Capacity revenue from ISO/RTO (a)— — (22)122 62 — 163 
Revenue from other wholesale contracts— 2,302 602 104 192 — 3,201 
Total revenue from contracts with customers7,988 6,110 1,366 334 1,364 538 — 17,700 
Other revenues:
Intangible amortization(2)— 74 — (12)— — 60 
Hedging and other revenues (b)(115)(4,355)123 35 (929)(442)— (5,683)
Affiliate sales (c)— 1,035 1,024 238 (18)(2,284)— 
Total other revenues(117)(3,320)1,221 40 (703)(460)(2,284)(5,623)
Total revenues$7,871 $2,790 $2,587 $374 $661 $78 $(2,284)$12,077 
____________
(a)Represents net capacity sold (purchased) in each ISO/RTO. The East segment includes $470 million of capacity purchased offset by $448 million of capacity sold.The West segment includes $1 million of capacity sold. The Sunset segment includes $126 million of capacity sold offset by $4 million of capacity purchased. The Asset Closure segment includes $62 million of capacity sold.
(b)Includes $1.191 billion of unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions.
For the year endedRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and OtherEliminations (1)Consolidated
December 31, 2021(325)(1,272)(637)(42)(394)(240)— 1,719 (1,191)
____________
(1) Amounts attributable to generation segments offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(c)Texas, East, Sunset and Asset Closure segments include $1.028 billion, $529 million, $144 million and $18 million respectively, of affiliated unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions with the Retail segment.

Retail Energy Charges

Revenue is recognized when electricity is delivered to our customers in an amount that we expect to invoice for volumes delivered or services provided. Sales tax is excluded from revenue. Payment terms vary from 15 to 60 days from invoice date. Revenue is recognized over-time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered. Energy charges are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.

Energy sales and services that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter reading provided by the independent system operators or electric distribution companies. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.

As contracts for retail electricity can be for multi-year periods, the Company has performance obligations under these contracts that have not yet been satisfied. These performance obligations have transaction prices that are both fixed and variable, and that vary based on the contract duration and customer type. For the fixed price contracts, the amount of any unsatisfied performance obligations will vary based on customer usage, which will depend on factors such as weather and customer activity and therefore it is not practicable to estimate such amounts.

97

Table of Contents
Wholesale Generation Revenue from ISOs/RTOs

Revenue is recognized when volumes are delivered to the ISO/RTO. Revenue is recognized over time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered and cash is settled within 10 days of invoicing. Vistra operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO/RTO indefinitely. Wholesale generation revenues are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation. When electricity is sold to and purchased from the same ISO/RTO in the same period, the excess of the amount sold over the amount purchased is reflected in wholesale generation revenues.

115

Table of Contents
Capacity Revenue From ISO/RTO

We offer generation capacity into competitive ISO/RTO auctions in exchange for revenue from awarded capacity offers. Capacity ensures installed generation and demand response is available to satisfy system integrity and reliability requirements. Capacity revenues are recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied ratably over time as our power generation facilities stand ready to deliver power to the customer. Penalties are assessed by the ISO/RTO against generation facilities if the facility is not available during the capacity period. The penalties are recorded as a reduction to revenue. When capacity is sold to and purchased from the same ISO/RTO in the same period, the excess of the amount sold over the amount purchased is reflected in capacity revenue.

Revenue from Other Wholesale Contracts

Other wholesale contracts include other revenue activity with the ISO/RTO, such as ancillary services, auction revenue, neutrality revenue and revenue from nonaffiliated retail electric providers, municipalities or other wholesale counterparties. Revenue is recognized when the service is performed. Revenue is recognized over time using the output method based on kilowatt hours delivered or other applicable measurements, and cash settles shortly after invoicing. Vistra operates as a market participant within ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and CAISO and expects to continue to remain under contract with each ISO/RTO indefinitely. Other wholesale contracts are delivered as a series of distinct services and are accounted for as a single performance obligation.

Other Revenues

Other revenues, as included in the tables of disaggregated revenue above, represent amounts not accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and are comprised of intangible amortization, hedging and other revenues and affiliate sales.

Intangible amortization represents amortization of acquired intangible liabilities related to retail and wholesale contracts (see Note 6).
Some of our contracts for the sale of electricity meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting standards related to derivative instruments. Revenue from derivative contracts accounted for under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging is not considered revenue from contracts with customers under the accounting standards related to revenue. Our revenue from the sale of electricity under derivative contracts, including the impact of unrealized gains or losses on those contracts, is reported in the table above as hedging and other revenues. We have classified all sales
Sales to affiliates that are presented by segment and eliminated in consolidation as other revenues in the table above.consolidation.

Contract and Other Customer Acquisition Costs

We defer costs to acquire retail contracts and amortize these costs over the expected life of the contract. The expected life of a retail contract is calculated using historical attrition rates, which we believe to be an accurate indicator of future attrition rates. The deferred acquisition and contract cost balance as of December 31, 2020, 20192023 and 2018 and January 1, 20182022 was $80 million, $53 million, $38$97 million and $22$89 million, respectively. The amortization related to these costs during the yearyears ended December 31, 20202023, 2022 and 20192021 totaled $46$88 million, $83 million and $21$75 million respectively, recorded as SG&A expenses, and $7$6 million, $6 million and $9$6 million, respectively, recorded as a reduction to operating revenues in the consolidated statements of operations.

98

Table of Contents
Practical Expedients

The vast majority of revenues are recognized under the right to invoice practical expedient, which allows us to recognize revenue in the same amount that we have a right to invoice our customers. Unbilled revenues are recorded based on the volumes delivered and services provided to the customers at the end of the period, using the right to invoice practical expedient. We have elected to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with variable consideration for which we recognize revenue using the right to invoice practical expedient. We use the portfolio approach in evaluating similar customer contracts with similar performance obligations. Sales taxes are not included in revenue.

Performance Obligations

As of December 31, 2020,2023, we have future performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied, relating to capacity auction volumes awarded through capacity auctions held by the ISO/RTO or contracts with customers. Therefore, an obligation exists as of the date of the results of the respective ISO/RTO capacity auction or the contract execution date. These obligations total $834$480 million, $496$417 million, $121$282 million, $38$100 million and $12$62 million that will be recognized in the years ending December 31, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2025,2028, respectively, and $7$610 million thereafter. Capacity revenues are recognized as capacity is made available to the related ISOs/RTOs or counterparties.

116

Table of Contents
Accounts Receivable

The following table presents trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for uncollectible accounts) relating to both contractsASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with customersCustomers and other activities:
December 31,
20202019
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$1,169 $1,246 
Other trade accounts receivable — net110 119 
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 


December 31,
20232022
Trade accounts receivable from contracts with customers — net$1,239 $1,644 
Other trade accounts receivable — net435 415 
Total trade accounts receivable — net$1,674 $2,059 

6.GOODWILL AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Goodwill

The following table provides information regarding our goodwill balance. There have been no impairmentsAs of both December 31, 2023 and 2022, the carrying value of goodwill since Emergence.totaled $2.583 billion as there were no additions or impairments in the years then ended. The carrying value of goodwill as of each date consists of the following:

Reportable SegmentReporting Unit
Carrying Value of Goodwill
Balance at December 31, 2018TexasTexas Generation$2,068122 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the MergerRetail (a)14 Retail2,461 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Crius TransactionTotal257 
Goodwill recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction214 
Balance at December 31, 20192,553 
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Crius Transaction(14)
Measurement period adjustments recorded in connection with the Ambit Transaction44 
Balance at December 31, 2020$2,583 

At December 31, 2020, the goodwill balance of $2.583 billion consisted of the following:____________

(a)$1.9071.944 billion arose in connection with our application of fresh start reporting at Emergence and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. Of the goodwill recorded at Emergence, $1.686 billion is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.
$175 million arose in connection with the Merger, of which $122 million was allocated to our Texas Generation reporting unit and $53 million was allocated to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Merger is deductible for tax purposes.
$243 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Crius Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. NaN of the goodwill related to the Crius Transaction is deductible for tax purposes.
$258 million of goodwill arose in connection with the Ambit Transaction and was allocated entirely to our Retail reporting unit. The goodwill related to the Ambit Transaction is deductible for tax purposes over 15 years on a straight-line basis.

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives areis required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may exist. We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill test date. On the most recent goodwill testing date, we applied qualitative factors and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our Retail and Texas Generation reporting units exceeded their carrying value at October 1, 2020.2023. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included reporting unit financial performance and market multiples, general macroeconomic, industry, and market conditions, cost factors, customer attrition, interest rates and changes in reporting unit book value.

11799

Table of Contents
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of the following:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Identifiable Intangible AssetIdentifiable Intangible AssetGross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
NetGross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
NetIdentifiable Intangible AssetGross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
NetGross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Retail customer relationshipRetail customer relationship$2,082 $1,434 $648 $2,078 $1,151 $927 
Software and other technology-related assetsSoftware and other technology-related assets414 186 228 341 125 216 
Retail and wholesale contractsRetail and wholesale contracts272 204 68 315 182 133 
Contractual service agreements (a)51 50 59 54 
Other identifiable intangible assets (b)96 19 77 40 15 25 
LTSA
Other identifiable intangible assets (a)
Total identifiable intangible assets subject to amortizationTotal identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization$2,915 $1,844 1,071 $2,833 $1,478 1,355 
Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)Retail trade names (not subject to amortization)1,374 1,391 
Mineral interests (not currently subject to amortization)
Total identifiable intangible assetsTotal identifiable intangible assets$2,446 $2,748 
Total identifiable intangible assets
Total identifiable intangible assets
____________
(a)At December 31, 2020, amounts related to contractual service agreements that have become liabilities due to amortization of the economic impacts of the intangibles have been removed from both the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization.
(b)Includes mining development costs and environmental allowances (emissions allowances and renewable energy certificates).

Identifiable intangible liabilities are comprised of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
Identifiable Intangible LiabilityIdentifiable Intangible Liability20202019Identifiable Intangible Liability20232022
Contractual service agreements$129 $110 
Purchase and sale of power and capacity87 100 
LTSA
Fuel and transportation purchase contractsFuel and transportation purchase contracts73 76 
Other identifiable intangible liabilities
Total identifiable intangible liabilitiesTotal identifiable intangible liabilities$289 $286 

118

Table of Contents
Expense related to finite-lived identifiable intangible assets and liabilities (including the classification in the consolidated statements of operations) consisted of:
Identifiable Intangible Assets and LiabilitiesConsolidated Statements of OperationsRemaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2020 (weighted average in years)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Identifiable Intangible AssetsIdentifiable Intangible AssetsConsolidated Statements of OperationsRemaining useful lives of identifiable intangible assets at December 31,
2023 (weighted average in years)
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Retail customer relationshipRetail customer relationshipDepreciation and amortization3$283 $275 $304 
Software and other technology-related assetsSoftware and other technology-related assetsDepreciation and amortization473 61 62 
Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale/fuel and transportation contractsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees317 23 43 
Retail and wholesale contracts
Other identifiable intangible assetsOther identifiable intangible assetsOperating revenues/fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees/depreciation and amortization5223 148 58 
Total intangible asset expense (a)Total intangible asset expense (a)$596 $507 $467 
____________
(a)Amounts recorded in depreciation and amortization totaled $360$158 million, $340$208 million and $370$275 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021, respectively. Amounts exclude contractual services agreements. Amounts include all expenses associated with environmental allowances including expenses accrued to comply with emissions allowance programs and renewable portfolio standards which are presented in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees on our consolidated statements of operations. Emissions allowance obligations are accrued as associated electricity is generated and renewable energy certificate obligations are accrued as retail electricity delivery occurs.

100

Table of Contents
The following is a description of the separately identifiable intangible assets. In connection with fresh start reporting, the Dynegy Merger, the Crius Transaction and the Ambit Transaction, the intangible assets were adjusted based on their estimated fair value as of the Effective Date, the Dynegy Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date and the Ambit Acquisition Date, respectively, based on observable prices or estimates of fair value using valuation models.

Retail customer relationship — Retail customer relationship intangible asset represents the fair value of our non-contracted retail customer base, including residential and business customers, and is being amortized using an accelerated method based on historical customer attrition rates and reflecting the expected pattern in which economic benefits are realized over their estimated useful life.

Retail trade names — Our retail trade name intangible asset represents the fair value of our retail brands, including the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric, and was determined to be an indefinite-lived asset not subject to amortization. This intangible asset is evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Significant assumptions included within the development of the fair value estimate include estimated gross margins for future periods and implied royalty rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2020.

Retail and wholesale contracts/purchase and sale contracts — These intangible assets represent the value of various acquired retail and wholesale contracts and purchasefuel and saletransportation purchase contracts. The contracts were identified as either assets or liabilities based on the respective fair values as of the Effective Date, the Dynegy Merger Date, the Crius Acquisition Date or the Ambit Acquisition Date utilizing prevailing market prices for commodities or services compared to the fixed prices contained in these agreements. The intangible assets or liabilities are being amortized in relation to the economic terms of the related contracts.

119

Table of Contents
Contractual service agreementsLTSA — Our acquired contractual service agreementsLTSA represent the estimated fair value of favorable or unfavorable contract obligations with respect to long-term plant maintenance agreements rail transportation agreements and rail car leases, and are being amortized based on the expected usage of the service agreements over the contract terms. The majority of the plant maintenance services relate to capital improvements and the related amortization of the plant maintenance agreements is recorded to property, plant and equipment. Amortization

Retail trade names — Our retail trade name intangible assets represent the fair value of rail transportationour retail brands, including the trade names of TXU EnergyTM, Ambit Energy, 4Change EnergyTM, Homefield Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, TriEagle Energy, Public Power and rail car lease agreements is recordedU.S. Gas & Electric, and were determined to fuel, purchased power costsbe indefinite-lived assets not subject to amortization. These intangible assets are evaluated for impairment at least annually in accordance with accounting guidance related to other indefinite-lived intangible assets. We have selected October 1 as our test date. Significant qualitative factors evaluated included trade name financial performance, general macroeconomic, industry, and delivery fees.market conditions, customer attrition and interest rates. On the most recent testing date, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of our retail trade name intangible asset exceeded its carrying value at October 1, 2023.

Estimated Amortization of Identifiable Intangible Assets and Liabilities

As of December 31, 2020,2023, the estimated aggregate amortization expense of identifiable intangible assets and liabilities for each of the next five fiscal years is as shown below.
YearYearEstimated Amortization ExpenseYearEstimated Amortization Expense
2021$276 
2022$183 
2023$128 
20242024$78 
20252025$54 
2026
2027
2028

101

Table of Contents
7.INCOME TAXES

Vistra files a U.S. federal income tax return that includes the results of its consolidated subsidiaries. Vistra is the corporate parent of the Vistra consolidated group. Pursuant to applicable U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations and published guidance of the IRS, corporations that are members of a consolidated group have joint and several liability for the taxes of such group.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

The components of our income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Current:Current:
U.S. Federal
U.S. Federal
U.S. FederalU.S. Federal$(5)$(1)$(13)
StateState41 10 30 
Total currentTotal current36 17 
Deferred:Deferred:
U.S. FederalU.S. Federal171 260 (8)
U.S. Federal
U.S. Federal
StateState59 21 (54)
Total deferredTotal deferred230 281 (62)
TotalTotal$266 $290 $(45)

120

Table of Contents
Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) recorded:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Income (loss) before income taxesIncome (loss) before income taxes$890 $1,216 $(101)
U.S. federal statutory rateU.S. federal statutory rate21 %21 %21 %U.S. federal statutory rate21 %21 %21 %
Income taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rateIncome taxes at the U.S. federal statutory rate187 255 (20)
Nondeductible TRA accretionNondeductible TRA accretion(7)
State tax, net of federal benefitState tax, net of federal benefit32 48 22 
Federal and State return to provision adjustment13 (17)(12)
Remeasurement of historical Vistra deferred taxes for expanded state footprint(54)
Effect of refundable minimum tax credits no longer subject to sequestration(15)
Nondeductible compensation
Nondeductible transaction costs
Equity awards(4)(3)
Valuation allowance on state NOLs
Valuation allowance on state NOLs
Valuation allowance on state NOLs
Release of Uncertain Tax Positions
Valuation allowance on state NOLs41 13 20 
Lignite depletion(3)(6)
Texas gross margin amended return(3)
Other
Other
OtherOther(6)(2)
Income tax expense (benefit)Income tax expense (benefit)$266 $290 $(45)
Effective tax rateEffective tax rate29.9 %23.8 %44.6 %Effective tax rate25.4 %22.4 %26.6 %

102

Table of Contents
Deferred Income Tax Balances

Deferred income taxes provided for temporary differences based on tax laws in effect at December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 are as follows:
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax AssetsNoncurrent Deferred Income Tax Assets
Tax credit carryforwards
Tax credit carryforwards
Tax credit carryforwardsTax credit carryforwards$75 $73 
Loss carryforwardsLoss carryforwards953 921 
Identifiable intangible assets
Identifiable intangible assets
Identifiable intangible assetsIdentifiable intangible assets293 214 
Long-term debtLong-term debt19 257 
Employee benefit obligationsEmployee benefit obligations129 112 
Commodity contracts and interest rate swapsCommodity contracts and interest rate swaps96 108 
OtherOther47 43 
Total deferred tax assetsTotal deferred tax assets$1,612 $1,728 
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax LiabilitiesNoncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liabilities
Property, plant and equipmentProperty, plant and equipment632 554 
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment
Total deferred tax liabilities
Total deferred tax liabilities
Total deferred tax liabilitiesTotal deferred tax liabilities632 554 
Valuation allowanceValuation allowance143 110 
Net Deferred Income Tax AssetNet Deferred Income Tax Asset$837 $1,064 

121

TableAs of Contents
At December 31, 2020,2023, we had total net deferred tax assets of approximately $837 million$1.22 billion that were substantially comprised of book and tax basis differences related to our generation and mining property, plant and equipment, as well as federal and state net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards. Our deferred tax assets were significantly impacted by the impacts of Winter Storm Uri as well as the Dynegy Merger. For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, we recognized a partial valuation allowancetax benefit of $32$20 million on the net operating loss carryforwardsrelease of state valuation allowances. For the year ended December 31, 2022, we recognized a tax benefit of $9 million on the release of state valuation allowances. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized a tax benefit of $74 million on the release of state valuation allowances largely related largely to Illinois and New York due to forecasted expiration.Illinois. As of December 31, 2019,2023, we assessed the need for a valuation allowance related to our deferred tax asset and considered both positive and negative evidence related to the likelihood of realization of the deferred tax assets. We have identified negative evidence, in the form of cumulative losses on an unadjusted basis over the preceding 12 quarters. We evaluated historical earnings after adjusting for certain nonrecurring items for purposes of projecting future income, performed scheduling of the reversal of temporary differences, and considered other positive and negative evidence. In connection with our analysis, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the federal deferred tax assets will be fully utilized by future taxable income, and thus no valuation allowance was required. A valuation allowance of approximately $3 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2022 against a portion of our charitable contribution deferred tax asset that is not more likely than not to be utilized before expiration in 2024.

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, we had $3.4$4.0 billion pre-tax net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that will begin to expire in 2032. At December 31, 2020, we had 0 remaining AMT credits refundable through the TCJA available.

The income tax effects of the components included in accumulated other comprehensive income totaled a net deferred tax assetliabilities of $5 millionzero and $3$7 million at December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively.

Coronavirus Aid, Relief,Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA)

In August 2022, the U.S. enacted the IRA, which, among other things, implements substantial new and Economic Security Act (CARES Act)modified energy tax credits, including a nuclear PTC, a solar PTC, a first-time stand-alone battery storage investment tax credit, a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT) on book income of certain large corporations, and a 1% excise tax on net stock repurchases. Treasury regulations are expected to further define the scope of the legislation in many important respects over the next twelve months. The excise tax on stock repurchases is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements. Vistra is not subject to the CAMT in the 2023 tax year since it applies only to corporations that have a three-year average annual adjusted financial statement income in excess of $1 billion. We have taken the CAMT and relevant extensions or expansions of existing tax credits applicable to projects in our immediate development pipeline into account when forecasting cash taxes for periods after the law takes effect. See Note 1 for our accounting policy related to refundable and transferable PTCs and ITCs.

103

Table of Contents
Final Section 163(j) Regulations

In response to the global pandemic related to COVID-19, the CARES Act was signed into law in March 2020. The CARES Act provides numerous relief provisions for corporate taxpayers, including modification of the utilization limitations on net operating losses, favorable expansion of the deduction for business interest expense under IRC Section 163(j) (Section 163(j)), the ability to accelerate timing of refundable AMT credits and the temporary suspension of certain payment requirements for the employer portion of social security taxes. Additionally, the final Section 163(j) regulations were issued in July 2020 and provided a critical correction to the proposed regulations with respect to the computation of adjusted taxable income. Vistra received $64 millionAs of January 1, 2022, certain provisions in 2020 relating to the acceleration of AMT refunds and an approximate $350 million increase in interest expense deduction over the 2019 and 2020 tax years under the cumulative impact of these final laws and regulation pertaining to Section 163(j). Additionally, Vistra expects to receive an approximate $305 million increase in interest expense deduction in the 2021 tax year under the final Section 163(j) regulations. We do not anticipateregulations have sunset, including the addback of depreciation and amortization to adjusted taxable income. As a material impactresult, under the law as currently enacted, Vistra's deductible business interest expense has been significantly limited for the 2023 tax year. Vistra remains active in legislative monitoring and advocacy efforts to support a legislative solution to reinstate and make permanent the effective tax rate from these impacts. Vistra is also utilizing the CARES Act payroll deferral mechanismaddback of depreciation and amortization to defer the payment of approximately $22 million from 2020 to 2021 and 2022.adjusted taxable income.

Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions

Accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions requires that all tax positions subject to uncertainty be reviewed and assessed with recognition and measurement of the tax benefit based on a "more-likely-than-not" standard with respect to the ultimate outcome, regardless of whether this assessment is favorable or unfavorable.

We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as current income tax expense. The amounts were immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021. The following table summarizes the changes to the uncertain tax positions, reported in accumulated deferred income taxes and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021.
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Balance at beginning of period, excluding interest and penalties$126 $39 $
Additions allocated in the Merger39 
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years
Additions based on tax positions related to prior years
Additions based on tax positions related to prior yearsAdditions based on tax positions related to prior years
Reductions based on tax positions related to prior yearsReductions based on tax positions related to prior years(90)
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year87 
Reductions related to the lapse of the tax statute of limitations
Settlements with taxing authorities
Settlements with taxing authorities
Settlements with taxing authoritiesSettlements with taxing authorities(3)
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penaltiesBalance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties$39 $126 $39 
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties
Balance at end of period, excluding interest and penalties

122

Table of Contents
Vistra and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in U.S. federal, state and stateforeign jurisdictions and are, expected to beat times, subject to examinations by the IRS and other taxing authorities. The IRS hasIn February 2021, Vistra was notified us of its intention to open an audit regarding the 2018 tax year. Crius is currently under audit bythat the IRS had opened a federal income tax audit for the tax years 20152018 and 2016.2019. The federal income tax audit was closed in June 2023 with immaterial changes. Uncertain tax positions totaling $39totaled zero and $36 million atas of December 31, 2020 reflect2023 and 2022, respectively. Of the final regulations under Section 163(j) that were released in July 2020, and we have adjusted deferredamounts recorded as unrecognized tax assets and liabilities by $87 million in the year ended December 31, 2020. Uncertainbenefits, an insignificant portion would impact our effective tax positions totaling $39 million at December 31, 2018 arose in connection with the Merger as discussed in Note 2.rate if recognized.

Tax Matters Agreement

On the Effective Date, we entered into the Tax Matters Agreement with EFH Corp. whereby the parties have agreed to take certain actions and refrain from taking certain actions in order to preserve the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off and to indemnify the other parties to the extent a breach of such agreement results in additional taxes to the other parties.

Among other things, the Tax Matters Agreement allocates the responsibility for taxes for periods prior to the Spin-Off between EFH Corp. and us. For periods prior to the Spin-Off: (a) Vistra is generally required to reimburse EFH Corp. with respect to any taxes paid by EFH Corp. that are attributable to us and (b) EFH Corp. is generally required to reimburse us with respect to any taxes paid by us that are attributable to EFH Corp.

We are also required to indemnify EFH Corp. against taxes, under certain circumstance, if the IRS or another taxing authority successfully challenges the amount of gain relating to the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale or the amount or allowance of EFH Corp.'s net operating loss deductions.

Subject to certain exceptions, the Tax Matters Agreement prohibits us from taking certain actions that could reasonably be expected to undermine the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off or to jeopardize the conclusions of the private letter ruling we obtained from the IRS or opinions of counsel received by us or EFH Corp., in each case, in connection with the Spin-Off. Certain of these restrictions apply for two years after the Spin-Off.

104

Table of Contents
Under the Tax Matters Agreement, we may engage in an otherwise restricted action if (a) we obtain written consent from EFH Corp., (b) such action or transaction is described in or otherwise consistent with the facts in the private letter ruling we obtained from the IRS in connection with the Spin-Off, (c) we obtain a supplemental private letter ruling from the IRS, or (d) we obtain an unqualified opinion of a nationally recognized law or accounting firm that is reasonably acceptable to EFH Corp. that the action will not affect the intended tax treatment of the Spin-Off.

8.TAX RECEIVABLE AGREEMENT OBLIGATION

On the Effective Date, Vistra entered into a tax receivable agreement (the TRA)the TRA with a transfer agent on behalf of certain former first-lien creditors of TCEH. The TRA generally provides for the payment by us to holders of TRA Rights of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal and state income tax that we realize in periods after Emergence as a result of (a) certain transactions consummated pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization (including the step-up in tax basis in our assets resulting from the PrefCo Preferred Stock Sale), (b) the tax basis of all assets acquired in connection with the acquisition of two CCGT natural gas-fueled generation facilities in April 2016 and (c) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA, plus interest accruing from the due date of the applicable tax return.

Pursuant to the TRA, we issued the TRA Rights for the benefit of the first lienfirst-lien secured creditors of TCEH entitled to receive such TRA Rights under the Plan of Reorganization. Such TRA Rights are entitled to certain registration rights more fully described in the Registration Rights Agreement (see Note 19)20). As of January 1, 2023, 426,369,370 of TRA Rights were outstanding.

In December 2023, Vistra repurchased (Repurchase) approximately 74% of the TRA Rights to receive payments under the TRA from a select group of registered holders of the TRA Rights (Selling Holders) in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per repurchased TRA Right, totaling an aggregate purchase price for the Repurchase of approximately $476 million. The consideration for the Repurchase was paid through the issuance of 476,081 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (see Note 15) to the Selling Holders in a transaction exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. As part of the transaction, the Company agreed to file a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 registering the resale of the shares by the Selling Holders of Series C Preferred Stock from time to time under Rule 415 of the Securities Act, which was filed on January 29, 2024. If the Company repurchases TRA Rights at any time during the 180 days following December 29, 2023 at a price per TRA Right greater than $1.50, the Company will pay the Selling Holders an amount equal to such excess purchase price per TRA Right sold by the Selling Holders.

In connection with the Repurchase, holders of approximately 74% of the outstanding TRA Rights consented to certain amendments to the TRA which were effected in an Amended and Restated Tax Receivables Agreement (A&R TRA), dated as of December 29, 2023. Such amendments to the TRA include (i) the removal of the Company's obligation to provide registered holders of the TRA Rights (Holders) with regular reporting and access to information, (ii) limitations on the transferability of the TRA Rights, (iii) removal of certain obligations of the Company in the event it incurs indebtedness and (iv) a change to the definition of "Change of Control."

In connection with the Repurchase, in the year ended December 31, 2023, we recognized a $29 million gain in other income in our consolidated statements of operations. The gain represents the difference between the $506 million carrying value of the portion of the TRA liability that was repurchased and the $476 million fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock issued.

On January 11, 2024, Vistra repurchased an additional 43,494,944 of outstanding TRA Rights from a select group of registered holders of TRA Rights in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per repurchased TRA Right. Total consideration of $65 million was paid using cash on hand.

On January 31, 2024, Vistra announced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all outstanding TRA Rights in exchange for consideration of $1.50 per tendered TRA Right accepted for purchase prior to close of business on February 13, 2024 (Early Tender Date), which included an early tender premium of $0.05 per TRA Right accepted for purchase. As of the Early Tender Date, 55,056,931 TRA Rights were accepted for purchase for total consideration of $83 million, which was paid using cash on hand. TRA Rights accepted for purchase after the Early Tender Date, but prior to close of business on February 28, 2024, will receive consideration of $1.45 per TRA Right accepted for purchase, which will be paid using cash on hand.

As of the Early Tender Date, we have repurchased an aggregate 98% of the original outstanding TRA Rights, of which 10,430,083 TRA Rights remain outstanding.

123105

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the changes to the TRA obligation, reported as other current liabilities and Tax Receivable Agreement obligation in our consolidated balance sheets, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
TRA obligation at the beginning of the periodTRA obligation at the beginning of the period$455 $420 $357 
Accretion expenseAccretion expense64 59 65 
Changes in tax assumptions impacting timing of payments (a)Changes in tax assumptions impacting timing of payments (a)(69)(22)14 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement
Impacts of Tax Receivable AgreementImpacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(5)37 79 
PaymentsPayments(2)(16)
Repurchase of TRA Rights
TRA obligation at the end of the periodTRA obligation at the end of the period450 455 420 
Less amounts due currentlyLess amounts due currently(3)
Noncurrent TRA obligation at the end of the periodNoncurrent TRA obligation at the end of the period$447 $455 $420 
____________
(a)During the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $82 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income due to increases in longer-term commodity price forecasts. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling approximately $64 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted book and taxable income due to increases in commodity price forecasts. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $69$115 million as a result of adjustments to forecasted taxable income, including the financial impacts of the CARES Act, changes to Section 163(j) percentage limitation amount, the impacts from the issuance of the final Section 163(j) regulationsWinter Storm Uri, and the anticipated tax benefits fromavailable under current tax laws for planned additional renewable development projects. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a decrease to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling approximately $22 million as a result of adjustments to the timing of forecasted taxable income and state apportionment due to the expansion of Vistra's state income tax profile, including the Dynegy, Crius and Ambit acquisitions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded an increase to the carrying value of the TRA obligation totaling $14 million related to changes in the timing of estimated payments resulting changes in the timing of estimated payments and new multistate tax impacts resulting from the Merger.

As of December 31, 2020,2023, the estimated carrying value of the TRA obligation totaled $450$171 million, which represents the discounted amount of projected payments under the TRA. The projected payments are based on certain assumptions, including but not limited to (a) the federal corporate income tax rate of 21%, (b) estimates of our taxable income in the current and future years and (c) additional states that Vistra now operates in, including the relevant tax rate and apportionment factor for each state. Our taxable income takes into consideration the current federal tax code, various relevant state tax laws and reflects our current estimates of future results of the business. The estimates of future business results include assumptions related to renewable development projects that Vistra is planning to execute that generate significant tax benefits. These benefits have a material impact on the timing of TRA obligation payments. These assumptions are subject to change, and those changes could have a material impact on the carrying value of the TRA obligation. As of December 31, 2020,2023, and excluding the January and February 2024 activity discussed above, the aggregate amount of undiscounted federal and state payments under the TRA is estimated to be approximately $1.4 billion,$350 million, with more than half of such amount expected to be paid during the next 15 years, and the final payment expected to be made around the year 2056 (if the TRA is not terminated earlier pursuant to its terms).

The carrying value of the obligation is being accreted to the amount of the gross expected obligation using the effective interest method. Changes in the amount of this obligation resulting from changes to either the timing or amount of TRA payments are recognized in the period of change and measured using the discount rate inherent in the initial fair value of the obligation.

The TRA provides that, in the event that Vistra breaches any of its material obligations under the TRA, or upon certain mergers, asset sales, or other forms of business combination or certain other changes of control, the transfer agent under the TRA may treat such event as an early termination of the TRA, in which case Vistra would be required to make an immediate payment to the holders of the TRA Rights equal to the present value (at a discount rate equal to three-month CME Term SOFR plus the tenor spread adjustment of 0.26161% plus 100 basis points) of the anticipated future tax benefits based on certain valuation assumptions.

The LIBOR provisions of the TRA are subject to the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act of 2022 (LIBOR Act) and the regulations promulgated to carry out the LIBOR Act (LIBOR Regulations). With respect to payments under the TRA, pursuant to the LIBOR Act and the LIBOR Regulations, the "Board-selected benchmark replacement" (BSBR) of three-month CME Term SOFR plus the tenor spread adjustment of 0.26161% automatically became the benchmark replacement to three-month LIBOR on July 1, 2023 and, in addition, the four conforming changes promulgated by the Federal Reserve System Board in the LIBOR Regulations (each of which is a technical or administrative in nature) also apply to the TRA, by operation of law, to effectuate the implementation and use of the foregoing BSBR.

106

Table of Contents
9.EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share available to common stockholders are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all potential issuances of common shares under stock-based incentive compensation arrangements. Cumulative dividends attributable to Series C Preferred Stock were immaterial during the year ended December 31, 2023.
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Net income (loss) attributable to Vistra
Less cumulative dividends attributable to Series A Preferred Stock
Less cumulative dividends attributable to Series B Preferred Stock
Less cumulative dividends attributable to Series C Preferred Stock
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock — basic
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock — basic
Net income (loss) attributable to common stock — basicNet income (loss) attributable to common stock — basic$636 $928 $(54)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — basicWeighted average shares of common stock outstanding — basic488,668,263 494,146,268 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basicNet income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — basic$1.30 $1.88 $(0.11)
Dilutive securities: Stock-based incentive compensation planDilutive securities: Stock-based incentive compensation plan2,422,205 5,789,223 
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding — dilutedWeighted average shares of common stock outstanding — diluted491,090,468 499,935,490 504,954,371 
Net income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — dilutedNet income (loss) per weighted average share of common stock outstanding — diluted$1.30 $1.86 $(0.11)

124

Table of Contents
Stock-based incentive compensation plan awards excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been antidilutive totaled 12,553,414, 2,447,850392,218, 8,292,647 and 14,165,81314,412,299 shares for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

10.ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE FINANCING

Accounts Receivable Securitization Program

TXU Energy Receivables Company LLC (RecCo), an indirect subsidiary of Vistra, has an accounts receivable financing facility (Receivables Facility) provided by issuers of asset-backed commercial paper and commercial banks (Purchasers). The Receivables Facility was renewed in July 2020,2023, extending the term of the Receivables Facility to July 2021, with the ability to borrow $550 million beginning with the settlement date in July 2020 until the settlement date in August 2020, $625 million from the settlement date in August 2020 until the settlement date in November 2020, $550 million from the settlement date in November 2020 until the settlement date in December 20202024 and $450 million thereafter for the remaining term of the Receivables Facility. In December 2020, the Receivables Facility was amended to include Ambit Texas, LLC (Ambit Texas), Value Based Brands and TriEagle Energy, as originators, and increaseadjusting the commitment of the Purchaserspurchasers to $500 million forpurchase interests in the remaining term of the Receivables Facility. In February 2021,receivables under the Receivables Facility was amendedduring all periods to allow for a one-time, $596fixed purchase limit of $750 million borrowingfrom seasonally adjusted commitment limits ranging from $600 million to take advantage of a higher receivable balance at such time. The borrowing limit is expected to return to $500 million in March 2021.$750 million.

In connection with the Receivables Facility, TXU Energy, Dynegy Energy Services, Ambit Texas, Value Based Brands and TriEagle Energy, each indirect subsidiaries of Vistra and originators under the Receivables Facility (Originators), each sell and/or contribute, subject to certain exclusions, all of its receivables (other than any receivables excluded pursuant to the terms of the Receivables Facility), arising from the sale of electricity to its customers and related rights (Receivables), to RecCo, a consolidated, wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote, direct subsidiary of TXU Energy. RecCo, in turn, is subject to certain conditions, and may draw under the Receivables Facility up to the limits described above to fund its acquisition of the Receivables from the Originators. RecCo has granted a security interest on the Receivables and all related assets for the benefit of the Purchasers under the Receivables Facility and Vistra Operations has agreed to guarantee the obligations under the agreements governing the Receivables Facility. Amounts funded by the Purchasers to RecCo are reflected as short-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets. Proceeds and repayments under the Receivables Facility are reflected as cash flows from financing activities in our consolidated statements of cash flows. Receivables transferred to the Purchasers remain on Vistra's balance sheet and Vistra reflects a liability equal to the amount advanced by the Purchasers. The Company records interest expense on amounts advanced. TXU Energy continues to service, administer and collect the Receivables on behalf of RecCo and the Purchasers, as applicable.

As of December 31, 2020,2023, there were no outstanding borrowings under the receivables facilityReceivables Facility. As of December 31, 2022, outstanding borrowings under the Receivables totaled $300$425 million and were supported by $735 million$1 billion of RecCo gross receivables. As of December 31, 2019, outstanding borrowings under the Receivables Facility totaled $450 million and were supported by $629 million of RecCo gross receivables. As of February 23, 2021, outstanding borrowings under the receivables facility totaled approximately $596 million and were supported by approximately $774 million of RecCo gross receivables..

107

Table of Contents
Repurchase Facility

In October 2020, TXU Energy and the other originators under the Receivables Facility entered intohave a $125 million repurchase facility (Repurchase Facility) that is provided on an uncommitted basis by a commercial bank as buyer (Buyer). In July 2023, the Repurchase Facility was renewed until July 2024 while maintaining the facility size of $125 million. The Repurchase Facility is collateralized by a subordinated note (Subordinated Note) issued by RecCo in favor of TXU Energy for the benefit of Originators under the Receivables Facility and representing a portion of the outstanding balance of the purchase price paid for the Receivables sold by the Originators to RecCo under the Receivables Facility. Under the Repurchase Facility, TXU Energy may request that Buyer transfer funds to TXU Energy in exchange for a transfer of the Subordinated Note, with a simultaneous agreement by TXU Energy to transfer funds to Buyer at a date certain or on demand in exchange for the return of the Subordinated Note (collectively, the Transactions)Repo Transaction). Each Repo Transaction is expected to have a term of one month, unless terminated earlier on demand by TXU Energy or terminated by Buyer after an event of default.

TXU Energy and the other Originators have each granted Buyer a first-priority security interest in the Subordinated Note to secure its obligations under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility, and Vistra Operations has agreed to guarantee the obligations under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility. Unless earlier terminated under the agreements governing the Repurchase Facility, the Repurchase Facility will terminate concurrently with the schedulescheduled termination of the Receivables Facility.

There were no outstanding borrowings under the Repurchase Facility as of both December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

11.COLLATERAL FINANCING AGREEMENT WITH AFFILIATE

On June 15, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into a facility agreement (Facility Agreement) with a Delaware trust formed by the Company (the Trust) that sold 450,000 pre-capitalized trust securities (P-Caps) redeemable May 17, 2028 for an initial purchase price of $450 million. The Trust is not consolidated by Vistra. The Trust invested the proceeds from the sale of the P-Caps in a portfolio of either (a) U.S. Treasury securities (Treasuries) or (b) Treasuries and/or principal and interest strips of Treasuries (Treasury Strips, and together with the Treasuries and cash denominated in U.S. dollars, the Eligible Assets). At the direction of Vistra Operations, the Eligible Assets held by the Trust can be (i) delivered to one or more designated subsidiaries of Vistra Operations in order to allow such subsidiaries to use the Eligible Assets to meet certain posting obligations with counterparties, and/or (ii) pledged as collateral support for a letter of credit program. Fees related to the Facility Agreement transaction totaled $7 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, which were capitalized as other noncurrent assets.

Under the Facility Agreement, Vistra Operations has the right (Issuance Right), from time to time, to require the Trust to purchase from Vistra Operations up to $450 million aggregate principal amount of Vistra Operations' 7.233% Senior Secured Notes due 2028 (7.233% Senior Secured Notes) in exchange for the delivery of all or a portion of the Treasuries and Treasury Strips corresponding to the portion of the issuance right exercised at such time.

The Trust will terminate at any time prior to May 17, 2028 and distribute the 7.233% Senior Secured Notes to the holders of the P-Caps if its sole assets consist of 7.233% Senior Secured Notes that Vistra Operations is no longer entitled to repurchase.

Vistra Operations pays a facility fee (Facility Fee) to the Trust payable on each May 17 and November 17, commencing on November 17, 2023, to and including May 17, 2028 (each, a Distribution Date), and on certain other dates as provided in the Facility Agreement. The Facility Fee is generally calculated at a rate of 3.3608% per annum, applied to the maximum amount of 7.233% Senior Secured Notes that Vistra Operations could issue and sell to the Trust under the Facility Agreement as of the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the applicable Distribution Date.

As of December 31, 2023, $439 million is the fair value of Eligible Assets held by counterparties to satisfy current and future margin deposit requirements and is reported in our consolidated balance sheets as margin deposits posted under affiliate financing agreement and margin deposit financing with affiliate.

125
108

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2020, there were 0 borrowings under the Repurchase Facility. In February 2021, the Company borrowed $125 million under the Repurchase Facility.

11.12.LONG-TERM DEBT

Amounts in the table below represent the categories of long-term debt obligations, including amounts due currently, incurred by the Company.
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, Term Loan B-3 Facility due December 20, 2030
Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes:
4.875% Senior Secured Notes, due May 13, 2024
4.875% Senior Secured Notes, due May 13, 2024
4.875% Senior Secured Notes, due May 13, 2024
3.550% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 2024
5.125% Senior Secured Notes, due May 13, 2025
3.700% Senior Secured Notes, due January 30, 2027
4.300% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 2029
6.950% Senior Secured Notes, due October 15, 2033
Total Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes
Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes:
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 1, 2026
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 1, 2026
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 1, 2026
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes, due February 15, 2027
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes, due July 31, 2027
4.375% Senior Unsecured Notes, due May 15, 2029
7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes, due October 15, 2031
Total Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes
December 31,
20202019
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities$2,572 $2,700 
Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes:
3.550% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 20241,500 1,500 
3.700% Senior Secured Notes, due January 30, 2027800 800 
4.300% Senior Secured Notes, due July 15, 2029800 800 
Total Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes3,100 3,100 
Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes:
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 1, 20261,000 1,000 
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes, due February 15, 20271,300 1,300 
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes, due July 31, 20271,300 1,300 
Total Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes3,600 3,600 
Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes:
5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes, due June 1, 2023500 
8.000% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 15, 202581 
8.125% Senior Unsecured Notes, due January 30, 2026166 
Total Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes747 
Other:Other:
Forward Capacity Agreements45 161 
Other:
Other:
Equipment Financing AgreementsEquipment Financing Agreements68 99 
8.82% Building Financing due semiannually through February 11, 2022 (a)10 15 
Other12 
Equipment Financing Agreements
Equipment Financing Agreements
Total other long-term debtTotal other long-term debt126 287 
Unamortized debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs (b)(68)(55)
Total other long-term debt
Total other long-term debt
Unamortized debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs
Total long-term debt including amounts due currentlyTotal long-term debt including amounts due currently9,330 10,379 
Less amounts due currently(95)(277)
Less amounts due currently (a)
Total long-term debt less amounts due currentlyTotal long-term debt less amounts due currently$9,235 $10,102 
____________
(a)Obligation related to a corporate office space finance lease. This obligation will be funded by amounts held    Includes $356 million of the 5.125% senior secured notes due 2025 repurchased for cash as part of the Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer in an escrow account that is reflected in other noncurrentJanuary 2024 (described below) as the payment was made with current assets inon our consolidated balance sheets.
(b)Includes impactsheet as of recording debt assumed in the Merger at fair value.December 31, 2023.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, outstanding short-term borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and the Commodity-Linked Facility (each described below) totaled zero and $650 million, respectively.

109

Table of Contents
Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and Commodity-Linked Revolving Credit Facility

Vistra Operations Credit Facilities

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities consisted of up to $5.297$5.675 billion in senior secured, first-lien revolving credit commitments and outstanding term loans, which consisted of revolving credit commitments of up to $2.725$3.175 billion including a $2.35 billion letter of credit sub-facility (Revolving Credit Facility) and term loans of $2.572$2.5 billion (Term Loan B-3 Facility). These amounts reflect the following transactions and amendments completed in 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018:2021:

In March 2020,On December 20, 2023, Vistra Operations repurchased $100entered into an amendment (December 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment) to the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement among Vistra Operations, as borrower, Vistra Intermediate, the guarantors party thereto, the 2023 Incremental Term Loan Lender, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and other parties named therein. Pursuant to the December 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment, (i) incremental term loans totaling $7 million aggregate principal amount ofwere established and were added to (and made part of) the existing Term Loan B-3 Facility, borrowings at(ii) the maturity date of the Term Loan B-3 Facility was extended to December 20, 2030, (iii) Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch provided notice of its intent to resign as administrative agent, collateral agent and a weighted average priceletter of $93.875credit issuer and cancelled them.Vistra Operations and the required lenders agreed to appoint Citibank, N.A. as successor thereto upon the effectiveness of such resignation, (iv) interest rate margins on the Term SOFR Rate and Alternate Base Rate (ABR) were increased by 25 basis points, and (v) the credit spread adjustment related to the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate applicable to the Term B-3 Facility, as discussed in the April 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment below, was eliminated. Fees and expenses related to the December 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment of $19 million and original issue discount of $25 million were capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt. We recorded an extinguishment gain of $6$3 million onrelated to the transactionDecember 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment in interest expense and other charges in our consolidated statements of operations.

On September 26, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into (a) an amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement, among Vistra Operations, as borrower, Vistra Intermediate, the guarantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, and the other parties named therein, and (b) an amendment to the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement, among Vistra Operations, as borrower, Vistra Intermediate, the guarantors party thereto, Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other parties named therein (such amendments, the September 2023 Amendments). The September 2023 Amendments, among other things, (i) implemented changes to certain covenants and other provisions of the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement and the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement, as applicable, to allow for the Energy Harbor acquisition and related additional financings contemplated by the Commitment Letter and (ii) provided for additional operational flexibility in the year endedconduct of Vistra Operation's business. In addition, the September 2023 amendment to the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement also provided Vistra Operations the flexibility to update the deemed hedge portfolio that serves as the borrowing base under the Commodity-Linked Facility on a more frequent basis.

On April 28, 2023, Vistra Operations entered into an amendment (April 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment) to the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement, among Vistra Operations, as borrower, Vistra Intermediate, the guarantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent, and the other parties named therein. Pursuant to the April 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment, and in light of a public statement by the supervisor for the administrator of the "LIBOR Rate" identifying June 30, 2023 as the date after which the "LIBOR Rate" was to permanently or indefinitely cease to be published, the "LIBOR Rate", with respect to the term loans under the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement, ceased to be applicable after June 30, 2023 and was replaced by the Adjusted Term SOFR Rate, other than as expressly contemplated by the April 2023 Credit Agreement Amendment. The Adjusted Term SOFR Rate with respect to the Term Loan B-3 Facility was effective through December 31, 2020.20, 2023 and was the interest rate per annum equal to the Term SOFR Rate plus (a) with respect to an interest period of one month, 0.11% per annum, (b) with respect to an interest period of three months, 0.26% per annum and (c) with respect to an interest period of six months, 0.43% per annum.

126110

Table of Contents
In November 2019,On April 29, 2022 (April 2022 Amendment Effective Date) and July 18, 2022 (July 2022 Amendment Effective Date), Vistra Operations usedentered into amendments (2022 Credit Agreement Amendments) to the netVistra Operations Credit Agreement, among Vistra Operations, as borrower, Vistra Intermediate, the guarantors party thereto, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the other parties named therein. Pursuant to the 2022 Credit Agreement Amendments, new classes of extended revolving credit commitments maturing in April 2027 were established in aggregate amounts of $2.8 billion and $725 million as of the April 2022 Amendment Effective Date and the July 2022 Amendment Effective Date, respectively. The July 18, 2022 amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement also provided that Vistra Operations would terminate at least $350 million in Extended Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) commitments by December 30, 2022 or earlier if Vistra Operations or any guarantor receives proceeds from any capital markets transaction whose primary purpose is designed to enhance the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering described belowliquidity of Vistra Operations and $799its guarantors. In accordance with this requirement, effective December 30, 2022, Vistra Operations terminated $350 million in revolving commitments. After giving effect to the 2022 Credit Agreement Amendments and the revolving commitment reduction, the aggregate amount of incremental borrowings underrevolving commitments maturing on April 29, 2027 equals $3.175 billion (Extended Revolving Credit Facility), while the Term Loan B-3$200 million in revolving commitments that matured on June 14, 2023 (Non-Extended Revolving Credit Facility) remained unchanged by the Credit Agreement Amendments. Furthermore, the 2022 Credit Agreement Amendments appointed new revolving letter of credit issuers, such that the aggregate amount of revolving letter of credit commitments equals $3.105 billion after giving effect to (i) the 2022 Credit Agreement Amendments and (ii) the maturity of the Non-Extended Credit Facility to repayon June 14, 2023 in accordance with the entire amount outstandingterms of $1.897 billion of term loans under the B-1 Facility (Term Loan B-1 Facility).Vistra Operations Credit Agreement. Fees and expenses related to the transactions2022 Credit Agreement Amendments totaled $2$8 million in the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, which were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of operations.

In October 2019, Vistra Operations borrowed $550 million under the Revolving Credit Facility. The proceeds of the borrowings were used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of a $425 million dividend to Vistra to pay the principal, premium and interest due in connection with the redemption by Vistra of the entire $387 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.625% senior notes described below. In November 2019, Vistra Operations repaid $200 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.

In June 2019, Vistra Operations used the net proceeds from the June 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offerings (described below) to repay $889 million under the Term Loan B-1 Facility, the entire amount outstanding of $977 million of term loans under the B-2 Facility (Term Loan B-2 Facility, and together with the Term Loan B-1 Facility and the Term Loan B-3 Facility, the Term Loan B Facility) and $134 million under the Term Loan B-3 Facility. We recorded an extinguishment loss of $4 million on the transactions in the year ended December 31, 2019.

In March 2019 and May 2019, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended whereby we obtained $225 million of incremental Revolving Credit Facility commitments. The letter of credit sub-facility was also increased by $50 million. Fees and expenses related to the amendments to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities totaled $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which were capitalized as a noncurrent asset.

In June 2018, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended whereby we incurred $2.050 billion of borrowings under the new Term Loan B-3 Facility and obtained $1.640 billion of incremental Revolving Credit Facility commitments. The letter of credit sub-facility was also increased by $1.585 billion. The maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility was extended from August 4, 2021 to June 14, 2023. As discussed below, the proceeds from the Term Loan B-3 Facility were used to repay borrowings under the credit agreement that Vistra assumed from Dynegy in connection with the Merger. Additionally, letter of credit term loans totaling $500 million (Term Loan C Facility) were repaid using $500 million of cash from collateral accounts used to backstop letters of credit. Fees and expenses related to the amendment to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities totaled $42 million in the year ended December 31, 2018, of which $23 million was recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of operations, $9 million was capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt and $10 million was capitalized as a noncurrent asset.debt.

DuringIn March 2021, Vistra Operations borrowed $1.0 billion principal amount under the Term Loan A Facility. In April 2021, Vistra Operations borrowed an additional $250 million principal amount under the Term Loan A Facility. Proceeds from the Term Loan A Facility, together with cash on hand, were used to repay certain amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings under the Term Loan A Facility were reported in short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheet. In May 2021, Vistra Operations used the proceeds from the issuance of the Vistra Operations 4.375% senior unsecured notes due 2029 (described below), together with cash on hand, to repay the $1.25 billion borrowings under the Term Loan A Facility. We recorded an extinguishment loss of $1 million on the transaction in the year ended December 31, 2020, we borrowed $1.075 billion and repaid $1.425 billion under the Revolving Credit Facility, with proceeds from the borrowings used for general corporate purposes.2021.

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities
111

Table of Contents
Our credit facilities and related available capacity at December 31, 20202023 are presented below.
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023
Credit FacilitiesCredit FacilitiesMaturity DateFacility
Limit
Cash
Borrowings
Letters of Credit OutstandingAvailable
Capacity
Extended Revolving Credit Facility (a)
December 31, 2020
Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesMaturity DateFacility
Limit
Cash
Borrowings
Letters of Credit OutstandingAvailable
Capacity
Revolving Credit Facility (a)June 14, 2023$2,725 $$737 $1,988 
Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)
Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)
Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)Term Loan B-3 Facility (b)December 31, 20252,572 2,572 
Total Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesTotal Vistra Operations Credit Facilities$5,297 $2,572 $737 $1,988 
Commodity-Linked Facility (c)
Total Credit Facilities
___________
(a)Extended Revolving Credit Facility to beis used for general corporate purposes. The Facility includes a $2.35 billion letter of credit sub-facility. Letters of credit outstanding reduce our available capacity. Cash borrowings under the Extended Revolving Credit Facility are reported in short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets. The full amount of Extended Revolving Credit Facility available capacity can be utilized to issue letters of credit. In December 2022, Vistra Operations terminated $350 million in Extended Revolving Credit Facility commitments.
(b)Beginning in 2020,Effective December 20, 2023, cash borrowings under the Term Loan B-3 Facility are subject to a required scheduled quarterly paymentpayments of $6.25 million beginning in annual amount equal to 1.00% of the original principal amount with the balance paid at maturity.March 2024. Amounts paid cannot be reborrowed.
(c)Commodity-Linked Facility (defined below) is used to support our comprehensive hedging strategy. As of December 31, 2023, the borrowing base of $1.101 billion is lower than the facility limit which represents aggregate commitments of $1.575 billion. See Commodity-Linked Revolving Credit Facility below for discussion of the borrowing base calculation. The Commodity-Linked Facility was amended in October 2023, increasing the aggregate commitments to $1.575 billion and extending the term to October 2024. The deemed hedge portfolio was also updated to reflect current hedge positions, including the addition of the 2025 deemed hedges. Cash borrowings under the Commodity-Linked Facility are reported in short-term borrowings in our consolidated balance sheets.

127

Table of Contents
In February 2018, June 2018 and November 2019, certain pricing terms forUnder the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities were amended. We accounted for these transactions as modificationsAgreement, the interest applicable to the Extended Revolving Credit Facility is based on the forward-looking term rate based on SOFR (Term SOFR Rate) plus a spread that will range from 1.25% to 2.00%, based on the ratings of debt. AtVistra Operations' senior secured long-term debt securities, and the fee on any undrawn amounts with respect to the Extended Revolving Credit Facility will range from 17.5 basis points to 35.0 basis points, based on ratings of Vistra Operations' senior secured long-term debt securities. As of December 31, 2020, cash2023, the applicable interest rate margins for the Extended Revolving Credit Facility and the fee for undrawn amounts relating to such extended commitments were lowered to 1.70% and 26.5 basis points, respectively, related to a sustainability pricing adjustment based on certain sustainability-linked targets and thresholds. As of December 31, 2023, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Extended Revolving Credit Facility would bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, plus a fixed spread of 1.75%, and there were 0 outstanding borrowings.Facility. Letters of credit issued under the Extended Revolving Credit Facility bear interest that ranges from 1.25% to 2.00% (based on the ratings of 1.75%. Amounts borrowedVistra Operations' senior secured long-term debt securities), which as of December 31, 2023 was reduced to 1.70% as a result of a sustainability pricing adjustment. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities also provide for certain additional customary fees payable to the agents and lenders, including fronting fees with respect to outstanding letters of credit.

Effective December 20, 2023, the principal amount under the Term Loan B-3 Facility increased from $2.493 billion to $2.50 billion and bears interest based on the applicable LIBOR ratesTerm SOFR Rate, plus a fixed spreadsspread of 1.75%. At December 31, 2020,2.00% and the weighted average interest rates before taking into consideration interest rate swaps on outstanding borrowings was 1.90%7.36% under the Term Loan B-3 Facility. The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities also provide for certain additional fees payable to the agents and lenders, including fronting fees with respect to outstanding letters of credit and availability fees payable with respect to any unused portion of the available Revolving Credit Facility.

Obligations under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities are secured by a lienliens covering substantially all of Vistra Operations' (and certain of its subsidiaries') consolidated assets, rights and properties, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, providedFacilities. The Vistra Operations Credit Agreement includes certain collateral suspension provisions that the amount of loans outstanding underwould take effect upon Vistra Operations achieving unsecured investment grade ratings from two ratings agencies, there being no Term Loans (under and as defined in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities that mayAgreement) then outstanding (or the holders thereof agreeing to release such security interests), and there being no outstanding revolving credit commitments the maturities of which have not been extended to April 29, 2027 (or the holders thereof agreeing to release such security interests), such collateral suspension provisions would continue to be secured by a lien covering certain principal properties of the Company is expressly limited by the terms of thein effect unless and until Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.no longer holds unsecured investment grade ratings from at least two ratings agencies, at which point collateral reversion provisions would take effect (subject to a 60-day grace period).

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities also permit certain hedging agreements and cash management agreements to be secured on a pari-passu basis with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities in the event those hedging agreements and cash management agreements met certain criteria set forth in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities.

112

Table of Contents
The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide for affirmative and negative covenants applicable to Vistra Operations (and its restricted subsidiaries), including affirmative covenants requiring it to provide financial and other information to the agents under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities and to not change its lines of business, and negative covenants restricting Vistra Operations' (and its restricted subsidiaries') ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, dispose of assets, pay dividends, grant liens or take certain other actions, in each case, except as permitted in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. Vistra Operations' ability to borrow under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities is subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions precedent set forth therein.

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide for certain customary events of default, including events of default resulting from non-payment of principal, interest or fees when due, material breaches of representations and warranties, material breaches of covenants in the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities or ancillary loan documents, cross-defaults under other agreements or instruments and the entry of material judgments against Vistra Operations. Solely with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility, and solely during a compliance period (which, in general, is applicable when the aggregate revolving borrowings and issued revolving letters of credit (in excess of $300 million) exceed 30% of the revolving commitments), the agreement includes a covenant that requires the consolidated first lien net leverage ratio, which is based on the ratio of net first lien debt compared to an EBITDA calculation defined under the terms of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00. Although1.00 (or, during a collateral suspension period, the period endedconsolidated total net leverage ratio, which is based on the ratio of consolidated total debt compared to an EBITDA calculation defined under the terms of the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, not to exceed 5.50 to 1.00). As of December 31, 2020 was not a compliance period,2023, we would have beenwere in compliance with this financial covenant if it was required to be tested at such time.covenant. Upon the existence of an event of default, the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities provide that all principal, interest and other amounts due thereunder will become immediately due and payable, either automatically or at the election of specified lenders.

Commodity-Linked Revolving Credit Facility

In order to support our comprehensive hedging strategy, in February 2022, Vistra Operations entered into a $1.0 billion senior secured commodity-linked revolving credit facility (Commodity-Linked Facility) by and among Vistra Operations, Vistra Intermediate, the lenders, joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent. In May 2022, we entered into an amendment to the Commodity-Linked Facility to increase the aggregate available commitments from $1.0 billion to $2.0 billion and to provide the flexibility, subject to our ability to obtain additional commitments, to further increase the size of the Commodity-Linked Facility by an additional $1.0 billion to a facility size of $3.0 billion. Subsequent amendments in May 2022 and June 2022 increased the aggregate available commitments from $2.0 billion to $2.25 billion. In October 2022, Vistra initiated amendments to the Commodity-Linked Facility to, among other things, reduce the aggregate available commitments to $1.35 billion. In September 2023, the Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement was amended to (i) conform to changes and modifications consistent with the Vistra Operations Credit Agreement including to allow for the Energy Harbor acquisition and related additional financings contemplated by the Commitment Letter and (ii) give Vistra Operations the flexibility to update the deemed hedge portfolio that serves as the borrowing base under the Commodity-Linked Facility on a more frequent basis. In October 2023, Vistra Operations initiated amendments to the Commodity-Linked Facility to, among other things,(i) extend the maturity date to October 2, 2024 and (ii) increase the aggregate available commitments to $1.575 billion.

Under the Commodity-Linked Facility, the borrowing base is calculated on a weekly basis based on a set of theoretical transactions which approximate a portion of the hedge portfolio of Vistra Operations and certain of its subsidiaries in certain power markets, with availability thereunder not to exceed the aggregate available commitments nor be less than zero. Vistra Operations may, at its option, borrow an amount up to the borrowing base, as adjusted from time to time, provided that if outstanding borrowings at any time would exceed the borrowing base, Vistra Operations shall make a repayment to reduce outstanding borrowings to be less than or equal to the borrowing base. Vistra Operations intends to use any borrowings provided under the Commodity-Linked Facility to make cash postings as required under various commodity contracts to which Vistra Operations and its subsidiaries are parties as power prices increase from time-to time and for other working capital and general corporate purposes.

Under the Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement, the interest applicable to the Commodity-Linked Facility is based on the Term SOFR Rate plus a spread that will range from 1.25% to 2.00%, based on the ratings of Vistra Operations' senior secured long-term debt securities, and the fee on any undrawn amounts with respect to the Commodity-Linked Facility will range from 17.5 basis points to 35.0 basis points, based on ratings of Vistra Operations' senior secured long-term debt securities. As of December 31, 2023, the applicable interest rate margins for the Commodity-Linked Facility and the fee on any undrawn amounts with respect to the Commodity-Linked Facility were lowered to 1.70% and 26.5 basis points, respectively, related to a sustainability pricing adjustment based on certain sustainability-linked targets and thresholds. As of December 31, 2023, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Commodity-Linked Facility.

128
113

Table of Contents
The Vistra Operations Commodity-Linked Credit Agreement includes a covenant, solely during a compliance period (which, in general, is applicable when the aggregate revolving borrowings exceeds 30% of the revolving commitments), that requires the consolidated first lien net leverage ratio, which is based on the ratio of net first lien debt compared to an EBITDA calculation defined under the terms of the Commodity-Linked Facility, not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00 (or, during a collateral suspension period, the consolidated total net leverage ratio, which is based on the ratio of consolidated total debt compared to an EBITDA calculation defined under the terms of the Commodity-Linked Facility, not to exceed 5.50 to 1.00). As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with this financial covenant.

Interest Rate Swaps

Vistra employs interest rate swaps to hedge our exposure to variable rate debt. As of December 31, 2020,2023, Vistra has entered into the following series of interest rate swap transactions. The rate ranges in the table below reflect the fixed leg of each swap plus an interest margin of 2.00%. The February 2024 and July 2026 swaps were amended in the second quarter of 2023 to reflect the conversion of LIBOR to SOFR.
Notional AmountNotional AmountExpiration DateRate Range
Notional AmountExpiration DateRate Range
Swapped to fixedSwapped to fixed$3,000July 20233.67 %-3.91%
Swapped to fixed
Swapped to fixed$600February 20243.86 %-3.88%
Swapped to variableSwapped to variable$600February 20243.35 %-3.36%
Swapped to fixedSwapped to fixed$3,000July 20264.89 %-4.97%
Swapped to variableSwapped to variable$700July 20233.20 %-3.23%Swapped to variable$700July 20263.44 %-3.49%
Swapped to fixed (a)Swapped to fixed (a)$720February 20243.71 %-3.72%Swapped to fixed (a)$1,625December 20305.20 %-5.37%
Swapped to variable$720February 20243.20 %-3.20%
Swapped to fixed (b)$3,000July 20264.72 %-4.79%
Swapped to variable (b)$700July 20263.28 %-3.33%
____________
(a)In June 2018, we completed the novation of $1.959 billion of Vistra (legacy Dynegy) interest rate swaps to Vistra Operations, of which $398 million expired and $841 million were terminated in June 2019.
(b)Effective from July 20232026 through July 2026.December 2030.

During 2019, Vistra entered into $2.12 billion of new interest rate swaps, pursuant to which Vistra will pay a variable rate and receive a fixed rate. The terms of these new swaps were matched against the terms of certain existing swaps, effectively offsetting the hedge of the existing swaps and fixing the out-of-the-money position of such swaps. These matched swaps will settle over time, in accordance with the original contractual terms. The remaining existing swapsSwaps expiring in July 2026 continue to hedge our exposure on $2.30 billion of debt through July 2026.

In October 2023, Vistra settled and terminated $120 million notional amount of each series of interest rate swaps expiring in February 2024.

In March 2023, Vistra entered into $750 million notional amount of interest rate swaps to hedge future floating rate debt issuances. The swaps were effective as of December 31, 2023 and expire December 31, 2030. In December 2023, we settled the January 2024 through July 2026 mark-to-market gain of these swaps for $13 million in cash proceeds, amended the effective dates to July 31, 2026 and modified the fixed rate coupons to correspond with the one-month Term SOFR Rate. In addition, in December 2023, Vistra entered into $875 million notional amount of interest rate swaps effective July 31, 2026 and expire December 31, 2030. These swaps, along with the $750 million notional amount of interest rate swaps entered into in March 2023, will hedge our exposure on $1.625 billion of floating rate debt from August 2026 through December 2030.

Secured Letter of Credit Facilities

In August and September 2020, Vistra entered into 4 uncommitted 364-day standby letter of credit facilities (Secured LOC Facilities) that are each secured by a first lien on substantially all of VistaVistra Operations' (and certain of its subsidiaries') assets (which ranks pari passu with the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities) (each, a Secured LOC Facility and collectively, the Secured LOC Facilities). AtThe Secured LOC Facilities are used for general corporate purposes. In October 2021, September 2022 and October 2022, Vistra entered into additional Secured LOC Facilities which are used for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2020, $3032023, $788 million of letters of credit were outstanding under the Secured LOC Facilities.

Alternate LetterEach of Creditthe Secured LOC Facilities includes a covenant that requires the consolidated first-lien net leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00 (or, for certain facilities that include a collateral suspension mechanism, during a collateral suspension period, the consolidated total net leverage ratio not to exceed 5.50 to 1.00). As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

NaN alternate letter
114

Table of credit facilities (each, an Alternate LOC Facility) became effective in the year ended December 31, 2019. NaN Alternate LOC Facility with an aggregate facility limit of $250 million matured in December 2020. The remaining Alternate LOC Facility with an aggregate facility limit of $250 million matures in December 2021. At December 31, 2020, $245 million of letters of credit were outstanding under this Alternate LOC Facility.Contents

Vistra Operations Senior Secured Notes

In 2019,September and December 2023, Vistra Operations issued $650 million and sold $3.1 billion$400 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount of 6.950% senior secured notes (June 2019 Senior Secured Notes and the November 2019due 2033 (6.950% Senior Secured Notes) in offerings (the June 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering and the November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering) to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act consisting of the following:
Senior Secured NotesMaturity YearInterest Terms
(Due Semiannually in Arrears)
June 2019
Senior Secured Notes Offering (a)
November 2019 Senior Secured Notes Offering (b)
3.550% Senior Secured Notes2024January 15 and July 15$1,200 $300 
3.700% Senior Secured Notes2027January 30 and July 30800 
4.300% Senior Secured Notes2029January 15 and July 15800 
Total senior secured notes$2,000 $1,100 
Net proceeds$1,976 $1,099 
Debt issuance and other fees (c)$20 $10 
___________
(a)Act. The June 20196.950% Senior Secured Notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. The 6.950% Senior Secured Notes mature in October 2033, with interest payable in cash semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 beginning April 2024. Net proceeds from the September 2023 issuance totaling $643 million, together with proceeds from the September 2023 issuance of 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes discussed below and cash on hand, will be used to fund the Transactions. Net proceeds from the December 2023 issuance totaling $412 million, together with proceeds from the December 2023 issuance of 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes discussed below and cash on hand, were used to prepay certain amounts outstandingpay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with the Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer described below. In the year ended December 31, 2023, fees and expenses of $12 million and a debt premium of $9 million related to these offerings were capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt.

In May 2022, Vistra Operations issued $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes (2022 Senior Secured Notes), consisting of $400 million aggregate principal amount of 4.875% senior secured notes due 2024 (4.875% Senior Secured Notes) and $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.125% senior secured notes due 2025 (5.125% Senior Secured Notes) in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Term Loan B Facility.
129

(b)Securities Act (Senior Secured Notes Offering). The November 20192022 Senior Secured Notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. The 4.875% Senior Secured Notes mature in May 2024 and the 5.125% Senior Secured Notes mature in May 2025. Interest on the 2022 Senior Secured Notes is payable in cash semiannually in arrears on May 13 and November 13 of each year, beginning in November 2022. Net proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes Offering totaling $1.485 billion, together with borrowings under the Term Loan B-3 Facility and cash on hand, were used to repay the entire amount outstanding and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses)pay down borrowings under the Term Loan B-1Commodity-Linked Facility.
(c)Capitalized Fees and expenses related to the offering totaled $17 million in the year ended December 31, 2023, which were capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt.

Since 2019, Vistra Operations issued and sold $5.65 billion aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes in offerings to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act. The indenture (as may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture) governing the June 20193.550% senior secured notes due 2024, the 3.700% senior secured notes due 2027, the 4.300% senior secured notes due 2029, the 2022 Senior Secured Notes and the November 20196.950% Senior Secured Notes (collectively, as each may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the Senior Secured Notes) provides for the full and unconditional guarantee by certain of Vistra Operations' current and future subsidiaries that also guarantee the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities. The Senior Secured Notes are secured by a first-priority security interest in the same collateral that is pledged for the benefit of the lenders under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, which consists of a substantial portion of the property, assets and rights owned by Vistra Operations and certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations as subsidiary guarantors (collectively, the Guarantor Subsidiaries) as well as the stock of Vistra Operations held by Vistra Intermediate. The collateral securing the Senior Secured Notes will be released if Vistra Operations' senior, unsecured long-term debt securities obtain an investment grade rating from two out of the three rating agencies, subject to reversion if such rating agencies withdraw the investment grade rating of Vistra Operations' senior, unsecured long-term debt securities or downgrade such rating below investment grade. The Vistra Operations Senior Secured Indenture contains certain covenants and restrictions, including, among others, restrictions on the ability of Vistra Operations and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to create certain liens, merge or consolidate with another entity, and sell all or substantially all of their assets.

Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer — In January 2024, Vistra Operations used the net proceeds from the December 2023 issuances of 6.950% Senior Secured Notes discussed above and 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes discussed below and cash on hand to fund a cash tender offer (Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $759 million aggregate principal amount of certain notes, including $58 million of 4.875% senior secured notes due 2024, $345 million of 3.550% senior secured notes due 2024 and $356 million of the 5.125% senior secured notes due 2025.

115

Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Notes

In 2018September and 2019,December 2023, Vistra Operations issued $1.1 billion and sold $3.6 billion$350 million, respectively, aggregate principal amount of 7.750% senior unsecured notes in offerings (the August 2018due 2031 (7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes Offering, the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering and the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offerings)Notes) in offerings to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act consisting of the following:
Senior Unsecured NotesMaturity YearInterest Terms
(Due Semiannually in Arrears)
August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (a)February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (b)June 2019
Senior Unsecured Notes Offering (c)
5.500% Senior Unsecured Notes2026March 1 and September 1$1,000 $$
5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes2027February 15 and August 151,300 
5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes2027January 31 and July 311,300 
Total$1,000 $1,300 $1,300 
Net Proceeds$990 $1,287 $1,287 
Debt issuance and other fees (d)$12 $16 $13 
___________
(a)Act. The 5.500% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (the August 20187.750% Senior Unsecured Notes)Notes were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiariescertain direct and indirect subsidiaries of Vistra Operations and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers. The 7.750% Senior Unsecured Notes mature in October 2031, with interest payable in cash semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 beginning April 2024. Net proceeds from the September 2023 issuances totaling $1.089 billion, together with proceeds from the September 2023 issuance of 6.950% Senior Secured Notes discussed above and cash on hand, and cash receivedwill be used to fund the Transactions. Net proceeds from the fundingDecember 2023 issuances totaling $360 million, together with proceeds from the December 2023 issuance of the Receivables Facility (see Note 10), were used to pay the purchase price6.950% Senior Secured Notes discussed above and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with the 2018 Tender Offers (defined below).
(b)The 5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2027 (the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes) were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC., as representative of the several initial purchasers. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to pay the purchase price and accrued interest (together with fees and expenses) required in connection with (i) the February 2019Senior Secured Notes Tender Offer (defined below)described above. In the year ended December 31, 2023, fees and (ii)expenses of $17 million and a debt premium of $7 million related to these offerings were capitalized as a reduction in the redemptioncarrying amount of approximately $35 millionthe debt.

In May 2021, Vistra Operations issued and sold $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our 7.375%4.375% senior unsecured notes due 2022 (7.375% senior notes)2029 in an offering to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and approximately $25 million aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 8.034%Regulation S under the Securities Act. The 4.375% senior unsecured notes due 2024 (8.034% senior notes).
(c)The 5.000% senior unsecured notes due 2027 (the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes)2029 were sold pursuant to a purchase agreement by and among Vistra Operations, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and Goldman Sachs & Co.J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as representative of the several initial purchasers. The 4.375% senior unsecured notes mature in May 2029, with interest payable in arrears on May 1 and November 1 beginning November 1, 2021 with interest accrued from May 10, 2021. Net proceeds, together with cash on hand, were used to payrepay all amounts outstanding under the purchase priceTerm Loan A Facility and accrued interest (together withto pay fees and expenses) required in connection with (i)expenses of $15 million related to the June 2019 Tender Offer (defined below)offering. Fees and (ii) the redemption of approximately $306 million of our outstanding 7.375% senior notes and approximately $87 million of our 7.625% senior unsecured notes due 2024 (7.625% senior notes) in July 2019. We recorded an extinguishment gain of $2 million on the redemptions in the year ended December 31, 2019.
130

(d)Capitalizedexpenses were capitalized as a reduction in the carrying amount of the debt.

Since 2018, Vistra Operations has issued and sold $6.30 billion aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes in offerings to eligible purchasers under Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act. The indentures governing the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes,5.500% senior unsecured notes due 2026, the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2027, the 5.000% senior unsecured notes due 2027, the 4.375% senior unsecured notes due 2029 and the August 20187.750% Senior Unsecured Notes (collectively, as each may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures) provide for the full and unconditional guarantee by the Guarantor Subsidiaries of the punctual payment of the principal and interest on such notes. The Vistra Operations Senior Unsecured Indentures contain certain covenants and restrictions, including, among others, restrictions on the ability of Vistra Operations and its subsidiaries, as applicable, to create certain liens, merge or consolidate with another entity, and sell all or substantially all of their assets.

Debt Repurchase Program

In November 2018, our board of directors (the Board) authorized a bond repurchase program under which up to $200 million principal amount of outstanding Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes could be repurchased. Through June 30, 2019, $119 million principal amount of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes had been repurchased. In July 2019,March 2021, the Board authorized up to $1.0$1.8 billion to voluntarily repay or repurchase any outstanding debt, of the Company (or its subsidiaries), with that authority superseding the remaining availability under the $200 million bond repurchase program. Through April 2020, $684 million amount of debt had beenwhich authorization expired in March 2022 (Prior Authorization). No amounts were repurchased under the $1.0 billion July 2019 authorization, includingPrior Authorization. In October 2022, the Board re-authorized the voluntary repayment or repurchase of $100 million principal amount of Term Loan B-3 Facility borrowings discussed above and the redemption of $81 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 8.000% senior unsecured notes due 2025 (8.000% senior notes) discussed below. In April 2020, the Board authorized up to $1.0$1.8 billion to repay or repurchase additionalof outstanding debt, with this new authority superseding and replacing the $316 million of availability under the previously authorized $1.0 billion debt repurchase program.such authorization expiring on December 31, 2023 (Updated Authorization). Through December 31, 2020, approximately $666 million had been2023, no amounts were repurchased under the $1.0 billion April 2020 authorization, consisting of the redemption of the Vistra 5.875% senior unsecured notes due 2023 (5.875% senior notes) and the redemption of the Vistra 8.125% senior unsecured notes due 2026 (8.125% senior notes), each as described below.

Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes

On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed $6.138 billion principal amount of Dynegy's senior unsecured notes (Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes. In June 2018, each of the Company's subsidiaries that guaranteed the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities (and did not already guarantee the senior notes) provided a guarantee on the senior notes that remained outstanding.

Following the redemption, repurchase and tender offer transactions below, Vistra had no outstanding senior notes at the Parent level.
Vistra Senior Unsecured NotesMaturity Year2018 Redemptions/Repurchases (a)August
2018 Tender Offer (b)
February 2019 Tender Offer (c)June
2019 Tender Offer (d)
2019 Redemptions (e)2020 Redemptions (f)
6.750%Senior Unsecured Notes2019$850 $$$— $$
7.375% Senior Unsecured Notes202243 1,193 173 341 
5.875% Senior Unsecured Notes2023500 
7.625% Senior Unsecured Notes202477 26 672 475 
8.034% Senior Unsecured Notes2024163 25 
8.000% Senior Unsecured Notes2025669 81 
8.125%Senior Unsecured Notes2026684 166 
Total$970 $1,542 $1,193 $845 $841 $747 
Extinguishment gain/(loss)$$(27)$$$11 $11 
____________
(a)In May 2018, $850 million of outstanding 6.75% senior unsecured notes due 2019 were redeemed at a redemption price of 101.688% of the aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to but not including the date of redemption. Fees and expenses related to the redemption totaled $14 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 and were recorded as interest expense and other charges on the consolidated statements of operations. In addition, Vistra repurchased $119 million of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes under the bond repurchase program described above.
(b)In August 2018, Vistra used the net proceeds from the August 2018 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering, proceeds from the Receivables Facility (see Note 10) and cash on hand to fund cash tender offers (the 2018 Tender Offers) to purchase for cash $1.542 billion aggregate principal amount of Vistra Senior Unsecured Notes.
(c)In February 2019, Vistra used the net proceeds from the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering to fund a cash tender offer (the February 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $1.193 billion aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes.
131

(d)In June 2019, Vistra used the net proceeds from the June 2019 Notes Offering to fund a cash tender offer (the June 2019 Tender Offer) to purchase for cash $173 million of 7.375% senior notes and $672 million of 7.625% senior notes. In July 2019, Vistra accepted and settled an additional approximately $1 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding 7.625% senior notes that were tendered after the early tender date of the June 2019 Tender Offer.
(e)In November 2019, Vistra redeemed $387 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of 7.625% senior notes at a redemption price equal to 103.8% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of redemption (the 2019 Redemption). Vistra redeemed $341 million, $87 million and $25 million aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior notes, 7.625% senior notes and 8.034% senior notes, respectively, using proceeds from the February 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offering and the June 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes Offerings discussed above.
(f)In January 2020, June 2020 and July 2020, Vistra redeemed aggregate principal amounts of $81 million of 8.000% senior notes, $500 million of 5.875% senior notes and $166 million of 8.125% senior notes, respectively, at redemption prices of 104%, 100.979% and 104.063%, respectively, of the aggregate principal amounts thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the dates of redemption (the 2020 Redemptions, and together with the 2019 Redemption, the Redemptions).

February2019 Consent Solicitation — In connection with the February 2019 Tender Offer, Vistra also commenced solicitation of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes. Vistra received the requisite consents from the holders of the 7.375% senior notes and amended the indenture governing these senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default.

August 2018 Consent Solicitations — In connection with the 2018 Tender Offers, Vistra also commenced solicitations of consents from holders of the 7.375% senior notes, the 7.625% senior notes, the 8.034% senior notes, the 8.000% senior notes and the 8.125% senior notes to amend certain provisions of the applicable indentures governing each series of senior notes and the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes. Vistra received the requisite consents from the holders of the 8.034% senior notes, the 8.000% senior notes and the 8.125% senior notes (collectively, the Consent Senior Notes) and amended (a) the indentures governing each series of the applicable senior notes to, among other things, eliminate substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default and (b) the registration rights agreement with respect to the 8.125% senior notes to remove, among other things, the requirement that Vistra commence an exchange offer to issue registered securities in exchange for the existing, nonregistered notes.

Other Long-Term Debt

Amortizing Notes — On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed the obligations of Dynegy's senior unsecured amortizing note (Amortizing Notes) that matured on July 1, 2019. The Amortizing Notes were issued in connection with the issuance of the tangible equity units (TEUs) by Dynegy (see Note 14). Each installment payment per Amortizing Note was paid in cash and constituted a partial repayment of principal and a payment of interest, computed at an annual rate of 7.00%. Interest was calculated on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. Payments were applied first to the interest due and payable and then to the reduction of the unpaid principal amount, allocated as set forth in the indenture (Amortizing Notes Indenture). On the maturity date, the Company paid all amounts due under the Amortizing Notes Indenture and the Amortizing Notes Indenture ceased to be of further force and effect.

Forward Capacity Agreements — On the Merger Date, the Company assumed the obligation of Dynegy's agreements under which a portion of the PJM capacity that cleared for Planning Years 2018-2019, 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 was sold to a financial institution (Forward Capacity Agreements). The buyer in this transaction will receive capacity payments from PJM during the Planning Years 2020-2021 in the amount of $45 million. We will continue to be subject to the performance obligations as well as any associated performance penalties and bonus payments for those planning years. As a result, this transaction is accounted for as long-term debt with an implied interest rate of 1.14%.

Equipment Financing Agreements — On the Merger Date, the Company assumed Dynegy's Equipment Financing Agreements. Under certain of our contractual service agreements in which we receive maintenance and capital improvements for our gas-fueled generation fleet, we have obtained parts and equipment intended to increase the output, efficiency and availability of our generation units. We financed these parts and equipment under agreements with maturities ranging from 2021 to 2026.

Mandatorily Redeemable Subsidiary Preferred Stock — In October 2019, PrefCo voluntarily redeemed the entire $70 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its authorized preferred stock at a price per share equal to the preferred liquidation amount, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to and including the date of redemption.

132

Debt Assumed in Crius Transaction — On the Crius Acquisition Date, Vistra assumed $140 million in long-term debt obligations in connection with the Crius Transaction consisting of the following:

$44 million of 9.5% promissory notes due July 2025 (2025 promissory notes);
$8 million of 2% Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development (CT DECD) term loans due February 2027; and
$88 million of borrowings and $9 million of issued letters of credit under the legacy Crius credit facility.

In July 2019, borrowings of $88 million under the legacy Crius credit facility were repaid using cash on hand. In November 2019, (i) borrowings of approximately $38 million under the 2025 promissory notes were repaid using cash on hand and (ii) borrowings of approximately $2 million were offset by legacy indemnification obligations of the holders of the 2025 promissory notes. In November 2019, borrowings of $8 million under the Connecticut Department of Economic and Community Development term loans were repaid using cash on hand.

Vistra (legacy Dynegy) Credit Agreement — On the Merger Date, Vistra assumed the obligations under Dynegy's $3.563 billion credit agreement consisting of a $2.018 billion senior secured term loan facility due 2024 and a $1.545 billion senior secured revolving credit facility. As of the Merger Date, there were 0 cash borrowings and $656 million of letters of credit outstanding under the senior secured revolving credit facility. On April 23, 2018, $70 million of the senior secured revolving credit facility matured. In June 2018, the $2.018 billion senior secured term loan facility due 2024 was repaid using proceeds from the Term Loan B-3 Facility. In addition, all letters of credit outstanding under the senior secured revolving credit facility were replaced with letters of credit under the amended Vistra Operations Credit Facilities discussed above, and the revolving credit facility assumed from Dynegy in connection with the Merger was paid off in full and terminated.Updated Authorization.

Maturities

Long-term debt maturities at December 31, 20202023 are as follows:
December 31, 2020
2021$98 
202244 
202340 
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023
202420241,540 
202520252,470 
2026
2027
2028
ThereafterThereafter5,206 
Unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costsUnamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs(68)
Total long-term debt, including amounts due currentlyTotal long-term debt, including amounts due currently$9,330 

133116

Table of Contents
12.13.LEASES

Vistra has both finance and operating leases for real estate, rail cars and equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms for 1 to 3734 years. Our leases include options to renew up to 15 years. Certain leases also contain options to terminate the lease.

Lease Cost

The following table presents costs related to lease activities:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Operating lease costOperating lease cost$14 $14 
Finance lease:Finance lease:
Finance lease right-of-use asset amortization
Finance lease right-of-use asset amortization
Finance lease right-of-use asset amortizationFinance lease right-of-use asset amortization
Interest on lease liabilitiesInterest on lease liabilities
Total finance lease costTotal finance lease cost14 
Variable lease cost (a)Variable lease cost (a)29 26 
Short-term lease costShort-term lease cost31 19 
Sublease income (b)Sublease income (b)(8)(8)
Net lease costNet lease cost$80 $59 
____________
(a)Represents coal stockpile management services, common area maintenance services, and rail car payments based on the number of rail cars used.
(b)Represents sublease income related to real estate leases.

Balance Sheet Information

The following table presents lease related balance sheet information:
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Lease assets:Lease assets:
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Operating lease right-of-use assets
Operating lease right-of-use assetsOperating lease right-of-use assets$45 $44 
Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)182 $59 
Total lease right-of-use assetsTotal lease right-of-use assets227 103 
Current lease liabilities:Current lease liabilities:
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities14 
Operating lease liabilities
Operating lease liabilities
Finance lease liabilitiesFinance lease liabilities
Total current lease liabilitiesTotal current lease liabilities16 22 
Noncurrent lease liabilities:Noncurrent lease liabilities:
Operating lease liabilitiesOperating lease liabilities40 41 
Operating lease liabilities
Operating lease liabilities
Finance lease liabilitiesFinance lease liabilities206 78 
Total noncurrent lease liabilitiesTotal noncurrent lease liabilities246 119 
Total lease liabilitiesTotal lease liabilities$262 $141 


117

Table of Contents
Supplemental Cash Flows and OtherFlow Information

The following table presents lease related cash flows and other information:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$17 $17 
Operating cash flows from finance leases
Finance cash flows from finance leases10 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Non-cash disclosure upon commencement of new lease:Non-cash disclosure upon commencement of new lease:
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilitiesRight-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities14 95 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilitiesRight-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance lease liabilities108 13 
Non-cash disclosure upon modification of existing lease:Non-cash disclosure upon modification of existing lease:
Modification of operating lease right-of-use assetsModification of operating lease right-of-use assets(1)(41)
Modification of operating lease right-of-use assets
Modification of operating lease right-of-use assets
Modification of finance lease right-of-use assetsModification of finance lease right-of-use assets23 50 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term

The following table presents weighted average remaining lease term information:
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Weighted average remaining lease term:Weighted average remaining lease term:
Operating lease
Operating lease
Operating leaseOperating lease12.3 years7.5 years20.1 years15.8 years
Finance leaseFinance lease24.2 years16.2 yearsFinance lease24.0 years24.2 years
Weighted average discount rate:Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leaseOperating lease5.80%5.34 %
Operating lease
Operating lease6.49%6.26 %
Finance leaseFinance lease4.92%5.84 %Finance lease4.81%4.81 %

Maturity of Lease Liabilities

The following table presents maturity of lease liabilities:
Operating LeaseFinance LeaseTotal Lease
2021$11 $14 $25 
202220 28 
202319 28 
202419 24 
202519 22 
Thereafter41 385 426 
Total lease payments77 476 553 
Less: Interest(29)(262)(291)
Present value of lease liabilities$48 $214 $262 

As of December 31, 2020, we have approximately $7 million of operating leases that have not yet commenced.
Operating LeaseFinance LeaseTotal Lease
2024$10 $20 $30 
202519 26 
202614 18 
202713 17 
202813 17 
Thereafter77 345 422 
Total lease payments106 424 530 
Less: Interest(51)(188)(239)
Present value of lease liabilities$55 $236 $291 


118

Table of Contents
13.14.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contractual Commitments

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, we had minimum contractual commitments under long-term service and maintenance contracts, energy-related contracts leases and other agreements as follows.follows:
Long-Term Service and Maintenance ContractsCoal purchase and
transportation agreements
Pipeline transportation and storage reservation feesNuclear
Fuel Contracts
Other
Contracts
2021$165 $516 $100 $92 $256 
2022186 47 73 43 49 
2023137 34 49 57 29 
Long-Term Service and Maintenance Contracts (a)
Long-Term Service and Maintenance Contracts (a)
Long-Term Service and Maintenance Contracts (a)Coal transportation agreementsPipeline transportation and storage reservation feesWater
Contracts
20242024142 36 36 40 24 
20252025170 37 30 36 11 
2026
2027
2028
ThereafterThereafter1,824 79 111 107 80 
TotalTotal$2,624 $749 $399 $375 $449 
____________
(a)Long-term service and maintenance contracts reflect expected expenditures as these contracts do not include minimum spending requirements, but can only be terminated based on events outside the control of the Company.

The table above excludes TRA and pension and OPEB plan obligations dueIn addition to the uncertainty in the timingcommitments detailed above, we have nuclear fuel contracts with early termination penalties. As of December 31, 2023, termination costs of $61 million would be incurred if we terminated those payments.contracts.

Expenditures under our coal purchase and coal transportation agreements totaled $845$936 million, $1.092 billion,$995 million, and $955$850 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018, respectively.

Rent reported as operating costs and SG&A expenses totaled $111 million, $89 million, and $74 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Guarantees

We have entered into contracts that contain guarantees to unaffiliated parties that could require performance or payment under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2020, thereMaterial guarantees are no material outstanding claims related to our guarantee obligations, and we do not anticipate we will be required to make any material payments under these guarantees in the near term.discussed below.

Letters of Credit

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $1.286$2.750 billion as follows:

$878 million2.408 billion to support commodity risk management collateral requirements in the normal course of business, including over-the-counter and exchange-traded transactions and collateral postings with ISOs/RTOs;
$190186 million to support battery and solar development projects;
$3427 million to support executory contracts and insurance agreements;
$10291 million to support our REP financial requirements with the PUCT; and
$8238 million for other credit support requirements.

Surety Bonds

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, we had outstanding surety bonds totaling $100$935 million to support performance under various contracts and legal obligations in the normal course of business.

136119

Table of Contents
Litigation and Regulatory Proceedings

Our material legal proceedings and regulatory proceedings affecting our business are described below. We believe that we have valid defenses to the legal proceedings described below and intend to defend them vigorously. We also intend to participate in the regulatory processes described below. We record reserves for estimated losses related to these matters when information available indicates that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss, or range of loss, can be reasonably estimated. As applicable, we have established an adequate reserve for the matters discussed below. In addition, legal costs are expensed as incurred. Management has assessed each of the following legal matters based on current information and made a judgment concerning its potential outcome, considering the nature of the claim, the amount and nature of damages sought, and the probability of success. Unless specified below, we are unable to predict the outcome of these matters or reasonably estimate the scope or amount of any associated costs and potential liabilities, but they could have a material impact on our results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition. As additional information becomes available, we adjust our assessment and estimates of such contingencies accordingly. Because litigation and rulemaking proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings or developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters could be at amounts that are different from our currently recorded reserves and that such differences could be material.

Litigation

NaturalGas Index Pricing Litigation — We, through our subsidiaries, and other companies areanother company remain named as defendants in several lawsuitsone consolidated putative class action lawsuit pending in federal court in Wisconsin claiming damages resulting from alleged price manipulation through false reporting of natural gas prices to various index publications, wash trading and churn trading from 2000-2002. The plaintiffs in these cases allege that the defendants engaged in an antitrust conspiracy to inflate natural gas prices during the relevant time period and seek damages under the respective state antitrust statutes. We remain as defendants in 2 consolidated putative class actions (Wisconsin) and 1 individual action (Kansas) both pending in federal court in those states. The Kansas action is currently on appeal inIn April 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.Seventh Circuit (Seventh Circuit Court) heard oral argument on an interlocutory appeal challenging the district court's order certifying a class.

Wood River Rail DisputeIllinois Attorney General Complaint Against Illinois Gas & Electric (IG&E) — In November 2017, Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (DMG) received notification that BNSF Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Company were initiating dispute resolution related to DMG's suspension of its Wood River Rail Transportation Agreement withMay 2022, the railroads. Settlement discussions required under the dispute resolution process have been unsuccessful. In March 2018, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) and Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NS)Illinois Attorney General filed a demand for arbitrationcomplaint against IG&E, a subsidiary we acquired when we purchased Crius in July 2019. The complaint filed in Illinois state court alleges, among other things, that IG&E engaged in improper marketing conduct and an arbitration hearing is currently scheduled for March 2021.overcharged customers. The vast majority of the conduct in question occurred prior to our acquisition of IG&E. In July 2022, we moved to dismiss the complaint, and in October 2022, the district court granted in part our motion to dismiss, barring all claims asserted by the Illinois Attorney General that were outside of the 5-year statute of limitations period, which now limits the period during which claims may be made to start in May 2017 rather than extending back to 2013 as the Illinois Attorney General had alleged in its complaint.

Coffeen and Duck Creek Rail Disputes — In April 2020, IPH, LLC (IPH) received notification that BNSF and NS were initiating dispute resolution related to IPH's suspension of its Coffeen Rail Transportation Agreement with the railroads, and Illinois Power Resources Generating, LLC (IPRG), received notification that BNSF was initiating dispute resolution related to IPRG's suspension of its Duck Creek Rail Transportation Agreement with BNSF. In November 2019, IPH and IPRG sent suspension notices to the railroads asserting that the MPS rule requirement to retire at least 2,000 megawatts of generation (see discussion below) was a change-in-law under the agreement that rendered continued operation of the plants no longer economically feasible. In addition, IPH and IPRG asserted that the MPS rule's retirement requirement also qualified as a force majeure event under the agreements excusing performance.Winter Storm Uri Legal Proceedings

ME2C Patent DisputeRepricing Challenges — In July 2019, Midwest Energy Emissions CorporationMarch 2021, we filed an appeal in the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Texas (Third Court of Appeals), challenging the PUCT's February 15 and MES Inc. (collectively,February 16, 2021 orders governing ERCOT's determination of wholesale power prices during load-shedding events. Other parties also supported our challenge to the plaintiffs) filedPUCT's orders. In March 2023, the Third Court of Appeals issued a patent infringement complaint in federal court in Delaware against numerous parties, including Vistraunanimous decision and someagreed with our arguments that the PUCT's pricing orders constituted de facto competition rules and exceeded the PUCT's statutory authority. The Third Court of its subsidiaries (collectively,Appeals vacated the Vistra defendants),pricing orders and remanded the matter to the PUCT for further proceedings. In March 2023, the PUCT appealed the Third Court of Appeals' ruling to the Texas Supreme Court. In September 2023, the Texas Supreme Court granted the PUC and its amended complaintintervenors petitions for review of the Third Court of Appeals' decision and the Court heard oral argument in July 2020. The amended complaint alleges thatJanuary 2024. In addition, we have also submitted settlement disputes with ERCOT over power prices and other issues during Winter Storm Uri. Following an appeal of the Vistra defendants infringedPUCT's March 5, patents owned2021 verbal order and other statements made by the plaintiffs by using specific processesPUCT, the Texas Attorney General, on behalf of the PUCT, its client, represented in a letter agreement filed with the Third Court of Appeals that we and other parties may continue disputing the pricing during Winter Storm Uri through the ERCOT process and, to the extent the outcome of that process comes before the PUCT for mercury controlreview, the PUCT has not prejudged or made a final decision on that matter. We are not able to reasonably estimate the financial statement impact of a repricing as, among other things, the matter is subject to ongoing legal proceedings and, even if we were ultimately successful in the current legal proceeding, the price at certain coal-fueled plants. The amended complaint seeks injunctive relief and unspecified damages. In July 2020,which the plaintiffsmarket would be resettled is not reasonably estimable because that would be subject to further proceedings at ERCOT and the Vistra defendants entered into an agreement resolving all the claims alleged against the Vistra defendants in the complaint. The court signed its stipulation and order of dismissal in July 2020, dismissing the Vistra defendants from the lawsuit.PUCT.

137120

Table of Contents
Climate Change

Regulatory Investigations and Other Litigation Matters
— Following the events of Winter Storm Uri, various regulatory bodies, including ERCOT, the ERCOT Independent Market Monitor, the Texas Attorney General, the FERC and the NRC initiated investigations or issued requests for information of various parties related to the significant load shed event that occurred during the event as well as operational challenges for generators arising from the event, including performance and fuel and supply issues. We responded to all those investigatory requests. In addition, a large number of personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits related to Winter Storm Uri have been, and continue to be, filed in various Texas state courts against us and numerous generators, transmission and distribution utilities, retail and electric providers, as well as ERCOT. We and other defendants requested that all pretrial proceedings in these personal injury cases be consolidated and transferred to a single multi-district litigation (MDL) pretrial judge. In June 2021, the MDL panel granted the request to consolidate all these cases into an MDL for pretrial proceedings. Additional personal injury cases that have been, and continue to be, filed on behalf of additional plaintiffs have been consolidated with the MDL proceedings. In addition, in January 2022, an insurance subrogation lawsuit was filed in Austin state court by over one hundred insurance companies against ERCOT, Vistra and several other defendants. The lawsuit seeks recovery of insurance funds paid out by these insurance companies to various policyholders for claims related to Winter Storm Uri, and that case has also now been consolidated with the MDL proceedings. In the summer of 2022, various defendant groups filed motions to dismiss five so-called bellwether cases, and the MDL court heard oral argument on those motions in October 2022. In January 2021,2023, the Biden administration issued a seriesMDL court ruled on the various motions to dismiss and denied the motions to dismiss of Executive Orders, including one titled Protecting Public Healththe generator defendants and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackletransmission distribution utilities defendants, but granted the Climate Crisis (the Environment Executive Order) which directed agencies,motions of some of the other defendant groups, including the EPA,retail electric providers and ERCOT. In February 2023, the generator defendants filed a mandamus petition with the First Court of Appeals in Houston, Texas (First Court of Appeals) to review various agency actions promulgated during the prior administration and take action where the previous administration's action conflicts with national objectives. SeveralMDL court's denial of the EPA agency actions discussed below are now subjectmotion to this review.dismiss. In December 2023, the First Court of Appeals in a unanimous decision granted our mandamus petition and instructed the MDL court to grant the motions to dismiss in full filed by the generator defendants. In January 2024, the plaintiffs filed a request with the full Court of Appeals to review that panel ruling. We believe we have strong defenses to these lawsuits and intend to defend against these cases vigorously.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG)

In August 2015, the EPA finalized rules to address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electricity generation units, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, including rules for existing facilities that would establish state-specific emissions rate goals to reduce nationwide CO2 emissions. Various parties filed petitions for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court). In July 2019, petitioners filed a joint motion to dismiss in light of the EPA's new rule that replaces the Clean Power Plan, the Affordable Clean Energy rule, discussed below. In September 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court granted petitioners' motion to dismiss and dismissed all of the petitions challenging the Clean Power Plan as moot.

In July 2019, the EPA finalized a rule to repealthat repealed the Clean Power Plan with(CPP) that had been finalized in 2015 and established new regulations addressing GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generation units, referred to as the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule. The ACE rule developsdeveloped emission guidelines that states must use when developing plans to regulate GHG emissions from existing coal-fueled electric generatinggeneration units. The ACE rule set a deadline of July 2022 for statesIn response to submit their plans for regulating GHG emissions from existing facilities. States where we operate coal plants (Texas, Illinois and Ohio) have begun the development of their state plans to comply with the rule. Environmentalchallenges brought by environmental groups and certain states, filed petitionsthe U.S. Court of Appeals for reviewthe District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court) vacated the ACE rule, andincluding the repeal of the Clean Power PlanCPP, in the D.C. Circuit Court, and the D.C. Circuit Court heard argument on those issues in October 2020. In January 2021 the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the ACE rule and remanded the rule to the EPA for further action. In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the D.C. Circuit Court's decision, and finding that the EPA exceeded its decision,authority under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act when the EPA set emission requirements in the CPP based on generation shifting. In October 2022, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that the EPA's basisissued an amended judgment, denying petitions for repealing the Clean Power Plan and adoptingreview of the ACE rule was not supported byand challenges to the Cleanrepeal of the CPP. In addition, the EPA opened a docket seeking input on questions related to the regulation of GHGs under Section 111(d) which closed in March 2023. In May 2023, the EPA released a new proposal regulating power plant GHG emissions, while also proposing to repeal the ACE rule. The new GHG proposal sets limits for (a) new natural gas-fired combustion turbines, (b) existing coal-, oil- and natural gas-fired steam generation units, and (c) certain existing natural gas-fired combustion turbines. The proposed standards are based on technologies such as carbon capture and sequestration/storage (CCS), low-GHG hydrogen co-firing, and natural gas co-firing. Starting in 2030, the proposal would generally require more CO2 emissions control at fossil fuel-fired power plants that operate more frequently and for more years and would phase in increasingly stringent CO2 requirements over time. Under the proposal, states would be required to submit plans to the EPA within 24 months of the rule's effective date that provide for the establishment, implementation, and enforcement of standards of performance for existing sources. These state plans must generally establish standards that are at least as stringent as the EPA's emission guidelines. Existing steam generation units must start complying with their standards of performance on January 1, 2030. Existing combustion turbine units must start complying with their standards of performance on January 1, 2032, or January 1, 2035, depending on their subcategory. We submitted comments to the EPA on this proposal in August 2023.

121

Table of Contents
Cross-State Air Act. Additionally,Pollution Rule (CSAPR)

In October 2015, the EPA revised the primary and secondary ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to lower the 8-hour standard for ozone emissions during ozone season (May to September). As required under the CAA, in DecemberOctober 2018, the EPA issued proposed revisionsState of Texas submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to the emission standards for new, modified and reconstructed units. Vistra submitted comments onEPA demonstrating that proposed rulemakingemissions from Texas sources do not contribute significantly to nonattainment in, March 2019.or interfere with maintenance by, any other state with respect to the revised ozone NAAQS. In January 2021,February 2023, the EPA justdisapproved Texas' SIP and the State of Texas, Luminant, certain trade groups, and others challenged that disapproval in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit Court). In March 2023, those same parties filed motions to stay the EPA's SIP disapproval in the Fifth Circuit Court, and the EPA moved to transfer our challenges to the D.C. Circuit Court or have those challenges dismissed.

In April 2022, prior to the transitionEPA's disapproval of Texas' SIP, the EPA proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to address the 2015 ozone NAAQS. We, along with many other companies, trade groups, states and ISOs, including ERCOT, PJM and MISO, filed responsive comments to the Biden administration, issuedEPA's proposal in June 2022, expressing concerns about certain elements of the proposal, particularly those that may result in challenges to electric reliability under certain conditions. In March 2023, the EPA administrator signed its final FIP. The FIP applies to 22 states beginning with the 2023 ozone seasons. States where Vistra operates generation units that would be subject to this rule are Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. Texas would be moved into the revised (and more restrictive) Group 3 trading program previously established in the Revised CSAPR Update Rule that includes emission budgets for 2023 that the EPA says are achievable through existing controls installed at power plants. Allowances will be limited under the program and will be further reduced beginning in ozone season 2026 to a level that is intended to reduce operating time of coal-fueled power plants during ozone season or force coal plants to retire, particularly those that do not have selective catalytic reduction systems such as our Martin Lake power plant.

In May 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court granted our motion to stay the EPA's disapproval of Texas' SIP pending a decision on the merits and denied the EPA's motion to transfer our challenge to the D.C. Circuit Court. As a result of the stay, we do not believe the EPA has authority to implement the FIP as to Texas sources pending the resolution of the merits, meaning that Texas will remain in Group 2 and not be subject to any requirements under the FIP at least until the Fifth Circuit Court rules on the merits. Oral argument was heard in December 2023 before the Fifth Circuit Court. In June 2023, the EPA published the final FIP in the Federal Register, which included requirements as to Texas despite the stay of the SIP disapproval by the Fifth Circuit Court. In June 2023, the State of Texas, Luminant and various other parties also filed challenges to the FIP in the Fifth Circuit Court, filed a motion to stay the FIP and confirm venue for this dispute in the Fifth Circuit Court. After the motion to stay and to confirm venue was filed, the EPA signed an interim final rule setting forth a significant contribution finding foron June 29, 2023 that confirms the purposeFIP as to Texas is stayed. In July 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that the FIP challenge would be held in abeyance pending the resolution of regulating GHG emissions from new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The final rule excludes sectors from future regulation where GHG emissions make up less than three percent of U.S. GHG emissions. The final rule didthe litigation on the SIP disapproval and denied the motion to stay as not set any specific emission limits for new, modified, or reconstructed electric utility generating units. The ACE rule andneeded given the rule on significant contribution are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.EPA's administrative stay.

Regional Haze — Reasonable Progress and Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for Texas

In October 2017, the EPA issued a final rule addressing BART for Texas electricity generation units, with the rule serving as a partial approval of Texas' 2009 State Implementation Plan (SIP)SIP and a partial Federal Implementation Plan (FIP).FIP. For SO2, the rule established an intrastate Texas emission allowance trading program as a "BART alternative" that operates in a similar fashion to a CSAPR trading program. The program includes 39 generatinggeneration units (including ourthe Martin Lake, Big Brown, Monticello, Sandow 4, Coleto Creek, Stryker 2 and Graham 2 plants). The compliance obligations in the program started on January 1, 2019. The retirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants have enhanced our ability to comply with this BART rule for SO2. For NOX, the rule adopted the CSAPR's ozone program as BART and for particulate matter, the rule approved Texas'sTexas' SIP that determines that no electricity generation units are subject to BART for particulate matter. Various parties filed a petition challenging the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Fifth Circuit Court) as well as a petition for reconsideration filed with the EPA. Luminant intervened on behalf of the EPA in the Fifth Circuit Court action. In March 2018, the Fifth Circuit Court abated its proceedings pending conclusion of the EPA's reconsideration process. In August 2020, the EPA issued a final rule affirming the prior BART final rule but also included additional revisions that were proposed in November 2019. In OctoberChallenges to both the 2017 rule and the 2020 environmental groups petitioned for review of this rulerules have been consolidated in both the D.C. Circuit Court, where we have intervened in support of the EPA. We are in compliance with the rule, and the Fifthretirements of our Monticello, Big Brown and Sandow 4 plants have enhanced our ability to comply. The EPA is in the process of reconsidering the BART rule, and the challenges in the D.C. Circuit Court. Briefing is underwayCourt have been held in abeyance pending the EPA's final action on reconsideration. In May 2023, a proposed BART rule was published in the proper venueFederal Register that would withdraw the trading program provisions of the prior rule and would establish SO2 limits on six facilities in Texas, including Martin Lake and Coleto Creek. Under the current proposal, compliance would be required within 3 years for any challengeMartin Lake and 5 years for Coleto Creek. Due to the final rule. As finalized,announced shutdown for Coleto Creek, we expectdo not anticipate any impacts at that facility, and we will be able to comply with the rule. The BART rule is subjectare evaluating potential compliance options at Martin Lake should this proposal become final. We submitted comments to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.EPA on this proposal in August 2023.

138122

Table of Contents
Affirmative Defenses During Malfunctions

In May 2015, the EPA finalized a rule requiring 36 states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, to remove or replace either EPA-approved exemptions or affirmative defense provisions for excess emissions during upset events and unplanned maintenance and startup and shutdown events, referred to as the SIP Call. Various parties (including Luminant, the State of Texas and the State of Ohio) filed petitions for review of the EPA's final rule, and all of those petitions were consolidated in the D.C. Circuit Court. In April 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court ordered the case to be held in abeyance. In April 2019, the EPA Region 6 proposed a rule to withdraw the SIP Call with respect to the Texas affirmative defense provisions. We submitted comments on that proposed rulemaking in June 2019. In February 2020, the EPA issued the final rule withdrawing the Texas SIP Call. In April 2020, a group of environmental petitioners, including the Sierra Club, filed a petition in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging the EPA's action with respect to Texas. Briefing is currently underway in the challenge to the EPA's action with respect to Texas. In October 2020, the EPA issued new guidance on the inclusion of startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) provisions in SIPs, which is intended to supersede the policy in the multi-state SIP Call. The guidance provides that the SIPs may contain provisions for SSM events if certain conditions are met. The EPA SSM guidance is subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.

Illinois Multi-Pollutant Standards (MPS)

In August 2019, changes proposed by the Illinois Pollution Control Board to the MPS rule, which places NOX, SO2 and mercury emissions limits on our coal plants located in MISO went into effect. Under the revised MPS rule, our allowable SO2 and NOX emissions from the MISO fleet are 48% and 42% lower, respectively, than prior to the rule changes. The revised MPS rule requires the continuous operation of existing selective catalytic reduction (SCR) control systems during the ozone season, requires SCR-controlled units to meet an ozone season NOX emission rate limit, and set an additional, site-specific annual SO2 limit for our Joppa Power Station. Additionally, in 2019, the Company retired its Havana, Hennepin, Coffeen and Duck Creek plants in order to comply with the MPS rule's requirement to retire at least 2,000 MW of our generation in MISO. See Note 4 for information regarding the retirement of these four plants.

SO2 Designations for Texas

In November 2016, the EPA finalized its nonattainment designations for counties surrounding our Big Brown, Monticello and Martin Lake generation plant and our now retired Big Brown and Monticello plants. The final designations require Texas to develop nonattainment plans for these areas. In February 2017, the State of Texas and Luminant filed challenges to the nonattainment designations in the Fifth Circuit Court. Subsequently, in October 2017, the Fifth Circuit Court granted the EPA's motion to hold the case in abeyance considering the EPA's representation that it intended to revisit the nonattainment rule. In December 2017, the TCEQ submitted a petition for reconsideration to the EPA. In August 2019, the EPA issued a proposed Error Correction Rule for all three areas, which, if finalized, would revisehave revised its previous nonattainment designations and each area at issue would be designated unclassifiable. In September 2019, we submitted comments in support of the proposed Error Correction Rule. In April 2020, the Sierra Club filed suit to compelMay 2021, the EPA to issue a Finding of Failure to submit an attainment plan with respect to the three areas in Texas. In August 2020, the EPA issued a Finding of Failure for Texas to submit an attainment plan. In September 2020, the EPA proposedfinalized a "Clean Data" determination for the areas surrounding the retired Big Brown and Monticello plants, which, if finalized, would redesignateredesignating those areas as attainment based on monitoring data supporting an attainment designation. In June 2021, the EPA published two notices; one that it was withdrawing the August 2019 Error Correction Rule and a second separate notice denying petitions from Luminant and the State of Texas to reconsider the original nonattainment designations. We, expectalong with the State of Texas, challenged that EPA action and have consolidated it with the pending challenge in the Fifth Circuit Court, and this case was argued before the Fifth Circuit Court in July 2022. In September 2021, the TCEQ considered a proposal for its nonattainment SIP revision for the Martin Lake area and an agreed order to reduce SO2 emissions from the plant. The proposed agreed order associated with the SIP proposal reduces emission limits as of January 2022. Emission reductions required are those necessary to demonstrate attainment with the NAAQS. The TCEQ's SIP action was finalized in February 2022 and has been submitted to the EPA for review and approval. In January 2024, in a split decision, the Fifth Circuit Court denied the petitions for review we and the State of Texas filed over the EPA's 2016 nonattainment designation for SO2 for the area around Martin Lake. As a result of this decision, the EPA's nonattainment designation – originally made in 2016 – remains in place. We anticipate the EPA will likely move forward with either proposing a federal plan for the area in light of an approved consent decree between the Sierra Club and the EPA that requires the EPA taking final action promulgating a FIP for the nonattainment area by December 13, 2024 or the EPA may approve Texas' SIP submittal discussed above. In February 2024, we filed a petition asking the full Fifth Circuit Court to review the panel decision issued in January 2024.

Particulate Matter

In February 2024, the EPA issued a rule addressing the annual health-based national ambient air quality standards for fine particulate matter (or PM2.5). In general, the rule lowers the level of the annual PM2.5 standard from 12.0 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) to 9.0 µg/m3. The effective date of the rule is 60 days from publication in the Federal Register, and the earliest attainment date for areas exceeding the new standard is 2032. At this time, we are still determining what impact, if any, this rule will have on our existing plants or any plants we may build in the future. Based on 2020-2022 design value associated with the rule, we have just five plants (Oakland (California), Calumet (Illinois), Liberty (Pennsylvania), Miami Fort (Ohio) and Lake Hubbard (Texas)) operating in areas where the air quality monitoring data are currently exceeding the new PM2.5 standard. We have previously announced that our Miami Fort generation facility will close by the end of 2027. States will have to develop a SIPplan (by late 2027 at the earliest) to get those areas into attainment and there would be a possibility that additional controls would be required for Texas for submittal tothose sites. However, before the state begins this planning process, the designation process will occur within two years from the issuance of the final rule. The states develop recommendations about the boundaries of the nonattainment counties and the EPA in 2021.must finalize the designations including the boundaries of each nonattainment area.

139123

Table of Contents
Effluent Limitation Guidelines (ELGs)

In November 2015, the EPA revised the ELGs for steam electricity generation facilities, which will impose more stringent standards (as individual permits are renewed) for wastewater streams, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD), fly ash, bottom ash and flue gas mercury control wastewaters. Various parties filed petitions for review of the ELG rule, and the petitions were consolidated in the Fifth Circuit Court. In April 2017, the EPA granted petitions requesting reconsideration of the ELG rule and administratively stayed the rule's compliance date deadlines. In August 2017, the EPA announced that its reconsideration of the ELG rule would be limited to a review of the effluent limitations applicable to FGD and bottom ash wastewaters and the agency subsequently postponed the earliest compliance dates in the ELG rule for the application of effluent limitations for FGD and bottom ash wastewaters from November 1, 2018 to November 1, 2020. Based on these administrative developments, the Fifth Circuit Court agreed to sever and hold in abeyance challenges to effluent limitations. The remainder of the case proceeded, and in April 2019, the Fifth Circuit Court vacated and remanded portions of the EPA's ELG rule pertaining to effluent limitations for legacy wastewater and leachate. In November 2019, the EPA issued a proposal that would extend the compliance deadline for FGD wastewater to no later than December 31, 2025 and maintains the December 31, 2023 compliance date for bottom ash transport water. The proposal also creates new sub-categories of facilities with more flexible FGD compliance options, including a retirement exemption to 2028 and a low utilization boiler exemption. The proposed rule also modified some of the FGD final effluent limitations. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. The EPA published thea final rule in October 2020. The final rule2020 that extends the compliance date for both FGD and bottom ash transport water to no later than December 2025, as negotiated with the state permitting agency. Additionally, the final rule allows for a retirement exemption that exempts facilities certifying that units will retire by December 2028 provided certain effluent limitations are met. Notification to the state agency on the retirement exemption is due by October 2021. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of the new ELG revisions, and Vistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA in December 2020. Notifications were made to Texas, Illinois and Ohio state agencies on the retirement exemption for applicable coal plants by the regulatory deadline of October 13, 2021. In March 2023, the EPA published its proposed supplemental ELG rule, which retains the retirement exemption from the 2020 ELG rule and sets new limits for plants that are continuing to operate. The finalproposed rule is subject toalso establishes pretreatment standards for combustion residual leachate, and we are currently evaluating the Environment Executive Order discussed above.impact of those proposed requirements. We submitted comments on the proposal in May 2023.

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR)/Groundwater

In July 2018, the EPA published a final rule, which became effective in August 2018, that amends certain provisions of the CCR rule that the agency issued in 2015. Among other changes, the 2018 revisions extended closure deadlines to October 31, 2020, related to the aquifer location restriction and groundwater monitoring requirements. Also, in August 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a decision that vacates and remands certain provisions of the 2015 CCR rule, including an applicability exemption for legacy impoundments. In December 2019, the EPA issued a proposed rule containing a revised closure deadline for unlined CCR impoundments and new procedures for seeking extensions of that revised closure deadline. We filed comments on the proposal in January 2020. In August 2020, the EPA issued a final rule finalizing the December 2019 proposal, establishing a deadline of April 11, 2021 to cease receipt of waste and initiate closure at unlined CCR impoundments. The final rule allows a generation plant to seek the EPA's approval to extend this deadline if no alternative disposal capacity is available and either a conversion to comply with the CCR rule is underway or retirement will occur by either 2023 or 2028 (depending on the size of the impoundment at issue). Prior to the November 2020 deadline, we submitted applications to the EPA requesting compliance extensions under both conversion and retirement scenarios. In 2022 and 2023, we withdrew the applications for Coffeen, Martin Lake, Joppa and Zimmer stations because extensions were no longer needed. In November 2020, environmental groups petitioned for review of this rule in the D.C. Circuit Court, and Vistra subsidiaries filed a motion to intervene in support of the EPA in December 2020. Also, in November 2020, the EPA finalized a rule that would allow an alternative liner demonstration for certain qualifying facilities. In November 2020, we submitted an application for an alternate liner demonstration for one CCR unit at Martin Lake.Lake, however, we withdrew the application for an alternate liner demonstration in November 2023 after determining the pond was no longer needed for CCR. In October 2020,August 2021, we submitted a request to transfer our conversion application for the Zimmer facility to a retirement application following the announcement that Zimmer will close by May 31, 2022. In January 2022, the EPA published an advanceddetermined that our conversion and retirement applications for our CCR facilities were complete but has not yet proposed action on any of those applications. In addition, in January 2022, the EPA also made a series of public statements, including in a press release, that purported to impose new, more onerous closure requirements for CCR units. The EPA issued these new purported requirements without prior notice and without following the legal requirements for adopting new rules. These new purported requirements announced by the EPA are contrary to existing regulations and the EPA's prior positions. In April 2022, we, along with the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group (USWAG), a trade association of proposed rulemaking requesting informationover 130 utility operating companies, energy companies, and certain other industry associations, filed petitions for review with the D.C. Circuit Court and have asked the court to informdetermine that the EPA cannot implement or enforce the new purported requirements because the EPA has not followed the required procedures. The State of Texas and the TCEQ have intervened in support of the petitions filed by the Vistra subsidiaries and USWAG, and various environmental groups have intervened on behalf of the EPA. Briefing before the D.C. Circuit Court is complete and the court will hear argument in March 2024.

In May 2023, the EPA issued another proposal that further revises the federal CCR rule that would expand coverage of groundwater monitoring and closure requirements to the following two new categories of units: (a) legacy units which are CCR impoundments at inactive sites that ceased receiving waste before October 19, 2015 and (b) so-called "CCR management units" which generally could encompass areas of CCR located at a facility that is currently regulated by the existing CCR rule. CCR Management Units, as defined by the EPA in the developmentproposal, could include any ash deposits, haul roads, and previously closed impoundments and landfills. As part of the proposed rule, the EPA identified 134 CCR management units at 82 different facilities across the country, including six of our potential units. The Vermilion ash ponds discussed below are the only unit which we believe qualify as a rule to address legacy impoundmentsCCR surface impoundment and given our closure plan for that existed prior to the 2015 CCR regulation as required by the August 2018 D.C. Circuit Court decision. We filed comments onsite we do not believe this proposal, if finalized, will have any impact on that site. We are continuing to evaluate what would be required of the CCR management units identified in February 2021. The rules on revised closure deadlines and alternative liner demonstrations are subject to the Environment Executive Order discussed above.proposal should the proposal become final in its current form. We submitted comments in July 2023.

124

Table of Contents
MISO — In 2012, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards onsite at our Baldwin and Vermilion facilities' CCR surface impoundments. These violation notices remain unresolved; however, in 2016, the IEPA approved our closure and post-closure care plans for the Baldwin old east, east, and west fly ash CCR surface impoundments. We are working towards implementation ofhave completed closure activities at those closure plans.ponds at our Baldwin facility.

140

Table of Contents
At our retired Vermilion facility, which was not potentially subject to the EPA's 2015 CCR rule until the aforementioned D.C. Circuit Court decision in August 2018, we submitted proposed corrective action plans involving closure of 2two CCR surface impoundments (i.e., the old east and the north impoundments) to the IEPA in 2012, and we submitted revised plans in 2014. In May 2017, in response to a request from the IEPA for additional information regarding the closure of these Vermilion surface impoundments, we agreed to perform additional groundwater sampling and closure options and riverbank stabilizing options. In May 2018, Prairie Rivers Network (PRN) filed a citizen suit in federal court in Illinois against DMG,Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC (DMG), alleging violations of the Clean Water Act for alleged unauthorized discharges. In August 2018, we filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. In November 2018, the district court granted our motion to dismiss and judgment was entered in our favor. Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals forIn June 2021, the Seventh Circuit and argument was heard in November 2020.Court affirmed the district court's dismissal of the lawsuit. In April 2019, PRN also filed a complaint against DMG before the IPCB, alleging that groundwater flows allegedly associated with the ash impoundments at the Vermilion site have resulted in exceedances both of surface water standards and Illinois groundwater standards dating back to 1992. This matter isWe answered that complaint in July 2021. In July 2023, PRN filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss the very early stages.case with prejudice, which the IPCB granted in August 2023 and closed the case.

In 2012, the IEPA issued violation notices alleging violations of groundwater standards at the Newton and Coffeen facilities' CCR surface impoundments. We are addressing these CCR surface impoundments in accordance with the federal CCR rule. In June 2018, the IEPA issued a violation notice for alleged seep discharges claimed to be coming from the surface impoundments at our retired Vermilion facility, which is owned by our subsidiary DMG, and that notice has since beenwas referred to the Illinois Attorney General.

In December 2018,June 2021, the Sierra ClubIllinois Attorney General and the Vermilion County State Attorney filed a complaint in Illinois state court with an agreed interim consent order which the IPCB allegingcourt subsequently entered. Given the disposalviolation notices and storage of coal ash at the Coffeen, Edwards and Joppa generation facilities are causing exceedancesenforcement action, the unique characteristics of the applicablesite, and the proximity of the site to the only national scenic river in Illinois, we agreed to enter into the interim consent order to resolve this matter. Per the terms of the agreed interim consent order, DMG is required to evaluate the closure alternatives under the requirements of the newly implemented Illinois Coal Ash regulation (discussed below) and close the site by removal. In addition, the interim consent order requires that during the impoundment closure process, impacted groundwater standards.will be collected before it leaves the site or enters the nearby Vermilion river and, if necessary, DMG will be required to install temporary riverbank protection if the river migrates within a certain distance of the impoundments. The interim order was modified in December 2022 to require certain amendments to the Safety Emergency Response Plan. In June 2023, the Illinois state court approved and entered the final consent order, which included the terms above and a requirement that when IEPA issues a final closure permit for the site, DMG will demolish the power station and submit for approval to construct an on-site landfill within the footprint of the former plant to store and manage the coal ash. These proposed closure costs are reflected in the ARO in our consolidated balance sheets (see Note 22).

In July 2019, coal ash disposal and storage legislation in Illinois was enacted. The legislation addresses state requirements for the proper closure of coal ash ponds in the state of Illinois. The law tasks the IEPA and the IPCB to set up a series of guidelines, rules and permit requirements for closure of ash ponds. In March 2020, the IEPA issued its proposed rule, and we expect the rulemaking process should be completed by early 2021. Under the proposedfinal rule, which was finalized and became effective in April 2021, coal ash impoundment owners would be required to submit a closure alternative analysis to the IEPA for the selection of the best method for coal ash remediation at a particular site. The proposed rule does not mandate closure by removal at any site. Public hearingsIn May 2021, we filed an appeal in the Illinois Fourth Judicial District over certain provisions of the final rule and that case remains pending. Other parties have also filed appeals of certain provisions of the final rule. In October 2021, we filed operating permit applications for 18 impoundments as required by the proposedIllinois coal ash rule, were heldand filed construction permit applications for three of our sites in January 2022 and five of our sites in July 2022. One additional closure construction application was filed for our Baldwin facility in August 2020 and September 2020. We expect that the rule will be finalized by March 2021.2023.

For all of the above matters, if certain corrective action measures, including groundwater treatment or removal of ash, are required at any of our coal-fueled facilities, we may incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Until the revisions to theThe Illinois coal ash rulemaking arerule was finalized in April 2021 and wedoes not require removal. However, the rule required us to undertake further site specific evaluations required by each program weprogram. We will not know the full range of decommissioning costs, ofincluding groundwater remediation, if any, that ultimately may be required under those rules.the Illinois rule until permit applications have been approved by the IEPA. However, the currently anticipated CCR surface impoundment and landfill closure costs as containedcurrently reflected in our AROs,existing ARO liabilities reflect the costs of closure methods that our operations and environmental services teams believe are appropriate based on existing closure requirements and protective of the environment for each location. Once the IEPA acts on our permit applications, we will reassess the decommissioning costs and adjust our ARO liabilities accordingly.

125

Table of Contents
MISO 2015-2016 Planning Resource Auction

In May 2015, 3three complaints were filed at the FERC regarding the Zone 4 results for the 2015-2016 planning resource auction (PRA) conducted by MISO. Dynegy is a named party in 1one of the complaints. The complainants, Public Citizen, Inc., the Illinois Attorney General and Southwestern Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Complainants), challenged the results of the PRA as unjust and unreasonable, requested rate relief/refunds, and requested changes to the MISO planning resource auction structure going forward. Complainants also alleged that Dynegy may have engaged in economic or physical withholding in Zone 4 constituting market manipulation in the PRA. The Independent Market Monitor for MISO (MISO IMM), which was responsible for monitoring the PRA, determined that all offers were competitive and that no physical or economic withholding occurred. The MISO IMM also stated, in a filing responding to the complaints, that there is no basis for the remedies sought by the Complainants. We filed our answer to these complaints explaining that we complied fully with the terms of the MISO tariff in connection with the PRA and disputing the allegations. The Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers filed a related complaint at the FERC against MISO in June 2015 requesting prospective changes to the MISO tariff. Dynegy also responded to this complaint with respect to Dynegy's conduct alleged in the complaint.

In October 2015, the FERC issued an order of nonpublic, formal investigation (the investigation) into whether market manipulation or other potential violations of the FERC orders, rules and regulations occurred before or during the PRA.

141

Table of Contents
In December 2015, the FERC issued an order on the complaints requiring a number of prospective changes to the MISO tariff provisions effective as of the 2016-2017 planning resource auction. The order did not address the arguments of the Complainants regarding the PRA and stated that those issues remained under consideration and would be addressed in a future order.

In July 2019, the FERC issued an order denying the remaining issues raised by the complaints and noted that the investigation into Dynegy was closed. The FERC found that Dynegy's conduct did not constitute market manipulation and the results of the PRA were just and reasonable because the PRA was conducted in accordance with MISO's tariff. With the issuance of the order, this matter has been resolved in Dynegy's favor. TheA request for rehearing was denied by the FERC in March 2020. The order was appealed by Public Citizen, Inc. to the D.C. Circuit Court in May 2020, and Vistra, Dynegy and Illinois Power Marketing Company intervened in the case in June 2020. In August 2021, the D.C. Circuit Court issued a ruling denying Public Citizen, Inc.'s arguments that the FERC failed to meet its obligation to ensure just and reasonable rates because it did not review the prices resulting from the auction before those prices went into effect and that the FERC was arbitrary and capricious in failing to adequately explain its decision to close its investigation into whether Dynegy engaged in market manipulation. The appeal remains pending.D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Public Citizen, Inc.'s petition in part finding that the FERC's decision that the auction results were just and reasonable solely because the auction process complied with the filed tariff was unreasoned and remanded the case back to the FERC for further proceedings on that issue. On February 4, 2022 the Illinois Attorney General and Public Citizen, Inc. filed a motion at the FERC requesting that the FERC on remand reverse its prior decision and either find that auction results were not just and reasonable and order Dynegy to pay refunds to Illinois or, in the alternative, initiate an evidentiary hearing and discovery. We filed a response to this motion and will continue to vigorously defend our position. In June 2022, the FERC issued an order on remand establishing paper hearing procedures and directing the Office of Enforcement to file a remand report within 90 days providing the Office of Enforcement's assessment of Dynegy's actions with regard to the 2015-2016 planning resource auction. Although the FERC directed the Office of Enforcement to file a remand report, the FERC stated in the June 2022 order that it is not reopening the Office of Enforcement investigation. In September 2022, the Office of Enforcement filed its remand report stating that the Office of Enforcement staff found during its investigation that Dynegy knowingly engaged in manipulative behavior to set the Zone 4 price in the 2015-2016 PRA. In June 2023, the Company filed its initial brief and response to the remand report, and in August 2023 the Company filed a reply to the initial briefs from other parties. We will continue to vigorously defend our position.

Other Matters

We are involved in various legal and administrative proceedings and other disputes in the normal course of business, the ultimate resolutions of which, in the opinion of management, are not anticipated to have a material effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

126

Table of Contents
Labor Contracts

We employ certain personnel who are represented by labor unions, the terms of whose employment are governed by collective bargaining agreements. The terms of all current collective bargaining agreements covering represented personnel engaged in lignite mining operations, lignite-, coal-, natural gas- and nuclear-fueled generation operations, andas well as some of our natural gas-fueled generationbattery operations, expire on various dates between May 2021March 2024 and November 2023,March 2028, but remain effective thereafter unless and until terminated by either party. We are also presently negotiating the terms of first contracts at two of our natural gas-fueled generation facilities. While we cannot predict the outcome of labor contract negotiations, we do not expect any negotiated terms in our new collective bargaining agreements or changes in our existing agreements to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

Nuclear Insurance

Nuclear insurance includes nuclear liability coverage, property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and accidental premature decommissioning coverage and accidental outage and/or extra expense coverage. We maintain nuclear insurance that meets or exceeds requirements promulgated by Section 170 (Price-Anderson) of the Atomic Energy Act (the Act) and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. We intend to maintain insurance against nuclear risks as long as such insurance is available. We are self-insured to the extent that losses (i) are within the policy deductibles, (ii) are not covered per policy exclusions, terms and limitations, (iii) exceed the amount of insurance maintained, or (iv) are not covered due to lack of insurance availability. Any such self-insured losses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

With regard to nuclear liability coverage, the Act provides for financial protection for the public in the event of a significant nuclear generation plant incident. The Act sets the statutory limit of public liability for a single nuclear incident at $13.8$16.2 billion and requires nuclear generation plant operators to provide financial protection for this amount. However, the U.S. Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims that exceed the $13.8$16.2 billion limit for a single incident. As required, we insure against a possible nuclear incident at our Comanche Peak facility resulting in public nuclear-related bodily injury and property damage through a combination of private insurance and an industry-wide retrospective payment plan known as Secondary Financial Protection (SFP).

Under the SFP, in the event of any single nuclear liability loss in excess of $450 million at any nuclear generation facility in the U.S., each operating licensed reactor in the U.S. is subject to an annual assessment of up to $137.6$165.9 million. This approximately $137.6$165.9 million maximum assessment is subject to increases for inflation every five years, with the next expected adjustment scheduled to occur by November 2023.2028. Assessments are currently limited to $20.5$24.7 million per operating licensed reactor per year per incident. As of December 31, 2020,2023, our maximum potential assessment under the industry retrospective plan would be approximately $275$331.8 million per incident but no more than $41$49.4 million in any one year for each incident. The potential assessment is triggered by a nuclear liability loss in excess of $450 million per accident at any nuclear facility. Effective January 1, 2024, the potential assessment is triggered by a nuclear liability loss in excess of $500 million per accident at any nuclear facility.

142

Table of Contents
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires that nuclear generation plant license holders maintain at least $1.06 billion of nuclear accident decontamination and reactor damage stabilization insurance, and requires that the proceeds thereof be used to place a plant in a safe and stable condition, to decontaminate a plant pursuant to a plan submitted to, and approved by, the NRC prior to using the proceeds for plant repair or restoration, or to provide for premature decommissioning. We maintain nuclear accident decontamination and reactor damage stabilization insurance for our Comanche Peak facility in the amount of $2.25 billion and non-nuclear accident related property damage in the amount of $1.0 billion (subject to a $5 million deductible per accident except for natural hazards which are subject to a $9.5 million deductible per accident), above which we are self-insured.

We also maintain Accidental Outage insurance to help cover the additional costs of obtaining replacement electricity from another source if one or both of the units at our Comanche Peak facility are out of service for more than twelve weeks as a result of covered direct physical damage. Such coverage provides for weekly payments per unit up to $4.5 million for the first 52 weeks and up to $3.6 million for thea remaining 26 weeks for non-nuclear and 71 weeks.weeks for nuclear property damage outages. The total maximum coverage is $328 million for non-nuclear property damage and $490 million for nuclear property damage.damage outages. The coverage amounts applicable to each unit will be reduced to 80% if both units are out of service at the same time as a result of the same accident.

127

Table of Contents
14.15.EQUITY

EquityCommon Stock Issuances and Repurchases

Changes in the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 are reflected in the table below.
Shares
Issued
Treasury
Shares
Shares Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2017428,398,802 428,398,802 
Shares issued (a) (b)97,639,105 97,639,105 
Shares retired(6,815)(6,815)
Shares repurchased(32,815,783)(32,815,783)
Balance at December 31, 2018526,031,092 (32,815,783)493,215,309 
Shares issued (a) (c)2,716,349 18,773,958 21,490,307 
Shares retired(6,106)(6,106)
Shares repurchased(27,001,399)(27,001,399)
Balance at December 31, 2019528,741,335 (41,043,224)487,698,111 
Shares issued (a)1,611,462 1,611,462 
Shares retired(3,685)(3,685)
Balance at December 31, 2020530,349,112 (41,043,224)489,305,888 
Shares
Issued
Treasury
Shares
Shares Outstanding
Balance at December 31, 2020530,349,112 (41,043,224)489,305,888 
Shares issued (a)2,583,761 — 2,583,761 
Shares retired(3,397)— (3,397)
Shares repurchased (b)— (27,988,518)(27,988,518)
Balance at December 31, 2021532,929,476 (69,031,742)463,897,734 
Shares issued (a)4,262,575 — 4,262,575 
Shares retired(12,979)— (12,979)
Shares repurchased (b)— (78,470,547)(78,470,547)
Balance at December 31, 2022537,179,072 (147,502,289)389,676,783 
Shares issued (a)6,474,491 — 6,474,491 
Shares retired(18,391)— (18,391)
Shares repurchased (b)— (44,994,499)(44,994,499)
Balance at December 31, 2023543,635,172 (192,496,788)351,138,384 
____________
(a)Shares issued includesinclude share awards granted to nonemployee directors.
(b)The year endedShares repurchased include 318,632, 78,087 and 5,174,863 of unsettled shares as of December 31, 2018 includes 94,409,573 shares issued in connection with the Merger (see Note 2).
(c)The year ended December 31, 2019 includes 18,773,958 treasury shares issued in connection with the settlement of all outstanding TEUs as discussed below.2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Share Repurchase Programs

Current Share Repurchase ProgramIn September 2020,October 2021, we announced that the Board authorized a new share repurchase program (Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $1.5$2.0 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock may be repurchased. The Share Repurchase Program wasbecame effective January 1,on October 11, 2021, at which time it superseded the Prior2020 Share Repurchase PlanProgram (described below) and all authorized amountsany authorization remaining thereunder terminated as of such date. In August 2022, March 2023 and February 2024, the Board authorized incremental amounts of $1.25 billion, $1.0 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, for repurchases to bring the total authorized under the Share Repurchase Program to $5.75 billion.
$5.75 Billion Board Authorization
Total Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid
Per Share
Amount Paid for Shares RepurchasedAmount Available for Additional Repurchases at the End of the Period
Year Ended December 31, 202119,330,365$21.16 $409 
Year Ended December 31, 202278,470,547$23.40 $1,836 
Year Ended December 31, 2023 (a)44,994,49927.89 1,255 
Total repurchased through December 31, 2023142,795,411$24.51 $3,500 $750 
January 1, 2024 through February 23, 20244,489,65141.39 186 
Total repurchased through February 23, 2024 (b)147,285,062$25.03 $3,686 $2,064 
____________
(a)Shares repurchased include 318,632 of unsettled shares for $12 million as of December 31, 2023.
(b)Amount available for additional repurchases at the end of the period includes additional $1.5 billion authorization approved by the Board in February 2024.


143128

Table of Contents
Under the Share Repurchase Program, shares of the Company's common stock may be repurchased in open market transactions at prevailing market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, pursuant to plans complying with the Exchange Act, or by other means in accordance with federal securities laws.The actual timing, number and value of shares repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program or otherwise will be determined at our discretion and will depend on a number of factors, including our capital allocation priorities, the market price of our stock, general market and economic conditions, applicable legal requirements and compliance with the terms of our debt agreements.agreements and the certificates of designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock, respectively.

Superseded Share Repurchase ProgramIn June 2018,September 2020, we announced that the Board had authorized a share repurchase program (2020 Share Repurchase Program) under which up to $500$1.5 billion of our outstanding shares of common stock may be repurchased. The 2020 Share Repurchase Program was effective on January 1, 2021. In the year ended December 31, 2021, 8,658,153 shares of our common stock were repurchased under the 2020 Share Repurchase Program for approximately $175 million at an average price of $20.21 per share of common stock. The 2020 Share Repurchase Program was superseded by the Share Repurchase Program described above in October 2021.

Preferred Stock

On October 15, 2021 (Series A Issuance Date), we issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in a private offering (Series A Offering). The net proceeds of the Series A Offering were approximately $990 million, after deducting underwriting commissions and offering expenses. We intend to use the net proceeds from the Series A Offering to repurchase shares of our outstanding common stock may be purchased, and this authorized amount was fully utilized in 2018. In November 2018, we announced thatunder the Board had authorized an incremental share repurchase program under which up to $1.250 billion of our outstanding stock may be purchased, resulting in an aggregate $1.750 billion share repurchase program (collectively, Prior Share Repurchase Program).The Prior Share Repurchase Program was terminated on January 1, 2021.Shares of common stock repurchased under the Prior Share Repurchase Program for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 are reflected in the table below.
$500 Million Board Authorization$1.250 Billion Board Authorization
Total Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid ShareAmount Paid for Shares RepurchasedTotal Number of Shares RepurchasedAverage Price Paid ShareAmount Paid for Shares Repurchased
Year Ended December 31, 201821,421,925$23.36 $500 12,073,091$22.99 $278 
Year Ended December 31, 20190$$26,322,166$24.34 $640 
Year Ended December 31, 202000
Totals21,421,925$23.36 $500 38,395,257$23.91 $918 
(described above).

On December 10, 2021 (Series B Issuance Date), we issued 1,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock in a private offering (Series B Offering). The net proceeds of the Series B Offering were approximately $985 million, after deducting underwriting commissions and offering expenses. We intend to use the net proceeds from the Series B Offering to pay for or reimburse existing and new eligible renewable and battery ESS developments.

On December 29, 2023 (Series C Issuance Date), we issued 476,081 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (Series C Offering) in exchange for 74% of outstanding TRA rights (see Note 8). We recorded the issuance at fair value of $476 million. In determining the fair value of the Series C Preferred Stock as of the issuance date, we utilized the market approach described in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which considers relevant observable market information for comparable instruments and is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock are not convertible into or exchangeable for any other securities of the Company and have limited voting rights. The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company at any time after the Series A First Reset Date (defined below) and in certain other circumstances prior to the Series A First Reset Date. The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company at any time after the Series B First Reset Date (defined below) and in certain other circumstances prior to the Series B First Reset Date. The Series C Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option of the Company at any time after the Series C First Reset Date (defined below) and in certain other circumstances prior to the Series C First Reset Date.

129

Table of Contents
Dividends

Common Stock Dividends

In November 2018, Vistra announced the Board adopted a dividend program which we initiated in the first quarter of 2019. Each dividend under the program will beis subject to declaration by the Board and, thus, may be subject to numerous factors in existence at the time of any such declaration including, but not limited to, prevailing market conditions, Vistra's results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, Delaware law and any contractual limitations. Quarterly dividends paid per share of common stock for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 are reflected in the table below.
Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2022Year Ended December 31, 2021
Board Declaration DatePayment
Date
Per Share AmountBoard Declaration DatePayment
Date
Per Share AmountBoard Declaration DatePayment
Date
Per Share Amount
February 2023March 2023$0.198 February 2022March 2022$0.170 February 2021March 2021$0.150 
May 2023June 2023$0.204 May 2022June 2022$0.177 April 2021June 2021$0.150 
August 2023September 2023$0.206 July 2022September 2022$0.184 July 2021September 2021$0.150 
November 2023December 2023$0.213 October 2022December 2022$0.193 October 2021December 2021$0.150 

In February 2019, May 2019, July 2019 and October 2019, the Board declared quarterly dividends of $0.125 per share that were paid in March 2019, June 2019, September 2019 and December 2019, respectively.

In February 2020, April 2020, July 2020 and October 2020, the Board declared quarterly dividends of $0.135 per share that were paid in March 2020, June 2020, September 2020 and December 2020, respectively.

In February 2021,2024, the Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15$0.215 per share of common stock that will be paid in March 2021.2024.

Vistra did not declare or pay anyPreferred Stock Dividends

The annual dividend rate on each share of Series A Preferred Stock is 8.0% from the Series A Issuance Date to, but excluding October 15, 2026 (Series A First Reset Date). On and after the Series A First Reset Date, the dividend rate on each share of Series A Preferred Stock shall equal the five-year U.S. Treasury rate as of the most recent reset dividend determination date (subject to a floor of 1.07%), plus a spread of 6.93% per annum. The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated but unpaid dividends. Cumulative cash dividends duringon the yearSeries A Preferred Stock are payable semiannually, in arrears, on each April 15 and October 15, commencing on April 15, 2022, when, as and if declared by the Board.

The annual dividend rate on each share of Series B Preferred Stock is 7.0% from the Series B Issuance Date to, but excluding December 15, 2026 (Series B First Reset Date). On and after the Series B First Reset Date, the dividend rate on each share of Series B Preferred Stock shall equal the five-year U.S. Treasury rate as of the most recent reset dividend determination date (subject to a floor of 1.26%), plus a spread of 5.74% per annum. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated but unpaid dividends. Cumulative cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are payable semiannually, in arrears, on each June 15 and December 15, commencing on June 15, 2022, when, as and if declared by the Board.

The annual dividend rate on each share of Series C Preferred Stock is 8.875% from the Series C Issuance Date to, but excluding January 15, 2029 (Series C First Reset Date). On and after the Series C First Reset Date, the dividend rate on each share of Series C Preferred Stock shall equal the five-year U.S. Treasury rate as of the most recent reset dividend determination date (subject to a floor of 3.83%), plus a spread of 5.045% per annum. The Series C Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, plus accumulated but unpaid dividends. Cumulative cash dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock are payable semiannually, in arrears, on each July 15 and January 15, commencing on July 15, 2024, when, as and if declared by the Board.

130

Table of Contents
Semiannual dividends paid per share of each respective preferred stock series for the years ended December 31, 2018.2023 and 2022 are reflected in the table below. Dividends payable are recorded on the Board declaration date.
Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2022
Board Declaration DatePayment
Date
Per Share
Amount
Board Declaration DatePayment
Date
Per Share
Amount
Series A Preferred Stock:Series A Preferred Stock:
February 2023April 2023$40.00 February 2022April 2022$40.00 
August 2023October 2023$40.00 July 2022October 2022$40.00 
Series B Preferred Stock:Series B Preferred Stock:
May 2023June 2023$35.00 May 2022June 2022$35.97 
November 2023December 2023$35.00 October 2022December 2022$35.00 

In February 2024, the Board declared a semi-annual dividend of $40.00 per share of Series A Preferred Stock that will be paid in April 2024.

Dividend Restrictions

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement generally restricts the ability of Vistra Operations to make distributions to any direct or indirect parent unless such distributions are expressly permitted thereunder. As of December 31, 2020,2023, Vistra Operations can distribute approximately $6.7$6.3 billion to Parent under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement without the consent of any party. The amount that can be distributed by Vistra Operations to Parent was partially reduced by distributions made by Vistra Operations to Parent of approximately $1.1$1.625 billion, $3.9$1.775 billion and $4.7 billion$405 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively. Additionally, Vistra Operations may make distributions to Parent in amounts sufficient for Parent to make any payments required under the TRA or the Tax Matters Agreement or, to the extent arising out of Parent's ownership or operation of Vistra Operations, to pay any taxes or general operating or corporate overhead expenses. As of December 31, 2020,2023, all of the maximum amount of restricted net assets of Vistra Operations that may not be distributed to Parent totaled approximately $1.2 billion.Parent.

In addition to the restrictions under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement, under applicable Delaware law, we are only permitted to make distributions either out of "surplus," which is defined as the excess of our net assets above our capital (the aggregate par value of all outstanding shares of our stock), or out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the distribution is declared or the prior fiscal year.

144Under the terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Preferred Stock, unless full cumulative dividends have been or contemporaneously are being paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof set apart for payment on all outstanding Series A Preferred Stock (and any parity securities), Series B Preferred Stock (and any parity securities), and Series C Preferred Stock (and any parity securities), respectively, with respect to dividends through the most recent dividend payment dates, (i) no dividend may be declared or paid or set apart for payment on any junior security (other than a dividend payable solely in junior securities with respect to both dividends and the liquidation, winding-up and dissolution of our affairs), including our common stock, and (ii) we may not redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any parity security or junior security, including our common stock, in each case subject to certain exceptions as described in the certificate of designation of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Series B Preferred Stock, and the Series C Preferred Stock, respectively.

Table of Contents
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

During the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, we recorded changes in the funded status of our pension and other postretirement employee benefit liability totaling $23$5 million, $11$(23) million and $9$(24) million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018, $(5)2021, $(4) million, $(3) millionzero and $(3)$(8) million respectively was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income and reported in other deductions.

131

Table of Contents
Warrants

At the Dynegy Merger Date, the Company entered into an agreement whereby the holder of each outstanding warrant previously issued by Dynegy would be entitled to receive, upon paying an exercise price of $35.00 (subject to adjustment from time to time), the number of shares of Vistra common stock that such holder would have been entitled to receive if it had held one share of Dynegy common stock at the closing of the Dynegy Merger, or 0.652 shares of Vistra common stock. Accordingly, upon exercise, a warrant holder would effectively pay $53.68 (subject to adjustment of the exercise price from time to time) per share of Vistra common stock received. As of December 31, 2020, 9000000 warrants expiring in 2024 were outstanding. The warrants were included in equity based on their fair value at the Dynegy Merger Date.

Tangible Equity Units (TEUs)

At the Merger Date, the Company assumed the obligations As of Dynegy's 4,600,000 7.00% TEUs, each with a stated amount of $100.00December 31, 2023, total warrants outstanding was approximately nine million, and each comprised of (i) a prepaid stock purchase contract that delivered to the holder on July 1, 2019, 4.0813 shares of Vistra common stock per contract with cash paidthey expired in lieu of any fractional shares at a rate of $22.5954 per share and (ii) a senior amortizing note with an outstanding principal amount of $38 million at the Merger Date that paid an equal quarterly cash installment of $1.75 per amortizing note (see Note 11). In the aggregate, the annual quarterly cash installments were equivalent to a 7.00% cash payment per year with respect to each $100.00 stated amount of TEUs. The amortizing notes were accounted for as debt while the stock purchase contract was included in equity based on the fair value of the contract at the Merger Date (see note 11). The entire class of TEUs were suspended from trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 1, 2019 and removed from listing and registration on July 12, 2019. On July 1, 2019, approximately 18.8 million treasury shares of Vistra common stock were issued in connection with the settlement of all outstanding TEUs.February 2024.

15.16.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

We utilize several different valuation techniques to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities, relying primarily on the market approach of using prices and other market information for identical and/or comparable assets and liabilities for those items that are measured on a recurring basis. We use a mid-market valuation convention (the mid-point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient to measure fair value for the majority of our assets and liabilities and use valuation techniques to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Our valuation policies and procedures were developed, maintained and validated by a centralized risk management group that reports to the Vistra Chief Financial Officer.

Fair value measurements of derivative assets and liabilities incorporate an adjustment for credit-related nonperformance risk. These nonperformance risk adjustments take into consideration master netting arrangements, credit enhancements and the credit risks associated with our credit standing and the credit standing of our counterparties (see Note 1617 for additional information regarding credit risk associated with our derivatives). We utilize credit ratings and default rate factors in calculating these fair value measurement adjustments.

We categorize our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the following fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 valuations use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date. Our Level 1 assets and liabilities include CME or ICE (electronic commodity derivative exchanges) futures and options transacted through clearing brokers for which prices are actively quoted. We report the fair value of CME and ICE transactions without taking into consideration margin deposits, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on certain CME transactions that are legally characterized as settlement of derivative contracts rather than collateral.

145

Table of Contents
Level 2 valuations utilize over-the-counter broker quotes, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities that are corroborated by correlations or other mathematical means, and other valuation inputs such as interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals. We attempt to obtain multiple quotes from brokers that are active in the markets in which we participate and require at least one quote from two brokers to determine a pricing input as observable. The number of broker quotes received for certain pricing inputs varies depending on the depth of the trading market, each individual broker's publication policy, recent trading volume trends and various other factors.

Level 3 valuations use unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to the extent observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use the most meaningful information available from the market combined with internally developed valuation methodologies to develop our best estimate of fair value. Significant unobservable inputs used to developin the valuation models include volatility curves, correlation curves, illiquid pricing delivery periods and locations and credit-related nonperformance risk assumptions. These inputs and valuation models are developed and maintained by employees trained and experienced in market operations and fair value measurements and validated by the Company's risk management group.

With respect to amounts presented in the followingThe fair value input hierarchy tables, the fair value measurement oflevel to which an asset or liability (e.g., a contract) is required to fallmeasurement in its entirety in one level,falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

132

Table of Contents
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following at the respective balance sheet dates shown below:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3 (a)
Reclass (b)TotalLevel
1
Level
2
Level
3 (a)
Reclass (b)Total
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Level
1
Level
1
Level
2
Level
3 (a)
Reclass (b)TotalLevel
1
Level
2
Level
3 (a)
Reclass (b)Total
Assets:Assets:
Commodity contracts
Commodity contracts
Commodity contractsCommodity contracts$452 $201 $205 $76 $934 $1,047 $172 $239 $11 $1,469 
Interest rate swapsInterest rate swaps— 72 — — 72 — — — — — 
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)623 — — — 623 564 — — — 564 
Nuclear decommissioning trust – debt securities (c)Nuclear decommissioning trust – debt securities (c)— 618 — — 618 — 521 — — 521 
Sub-totalSub-total$1,075 $891 $205 $76 2,247 $1,611 $693 $239 $11 2,554 
Assets measured at net asset value (d):Assets measured at net asset value (d):
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)433 366 
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)
Nuclear decommissioning trust – equity securities (c)
Total assetsTotal assets$2,680 $2,920 
Liabilities:Liabilities:
Commodity contractsCommodity contracts$578 $172 $183 $76 $1,009 $985 $439 $313 $11 $1,748 
Commodity contracts
Commodity contracts
Interest rate swapsInterest rate swaps— 404 — — 404 — 177 — — 177 
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities$578 $576 $183 $76 $1,413 $985 $616 $313 $11 $1,925 
____________
(a)See table below for description of Level 3 assets and liabilities.
(b)Fair values for each level are determined on a contract basis, but certain contracts resultare in a currentboth an asset and a noncurrent liability or vice versa, asposition. This reclassification represents the adjustment needed to reconcile to the gross amounts presented inon our consolidated balance sheets.sheet.
(c)The nuclear decommissioning trust investment is included in the other investments line in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 21.22.
(d)The fair value amounts presented in this line are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in our consolidated balance sheets. Certain investments measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) have not been classified in the fair value hierarchy. Net asset value as a practical expedient is the classification used for assets that do not have readily determinable fair values.

Commodity contracts consist primarily of natural gas, electricity, coal and emissions agreements and include financial instruments entered into for economic hedging purposes as well as physical contracts that have not been designated as normal purchases or sales.NPNS. Interest rate swaps are used to reduce exposure to interest rate changes by converting floating-rate interest to fixed rates. See Note 1617 for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.

146

Table of Contents
Nuclear decommissioning trust assets represent securities held for the purpose of funding the future retirement and decommissioning of our nuclear generation facility. These investments include equity, debt and other fixed-income securities consistent with investment rules established by the NRC and the PUCT.

133

Table of Contents
The following tables present the fair value of the Level 3 assets and liabilities by major contract type and the significant unobservable inputs used in the valuations at December 31, 20202023 and 2019:2022:
December 31, 2020
Fair Value
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023
Fair Value
Contract Type (a)
Contract Type (a)
Contract Type (a)Contract Type (a)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)
Electricity purchases and salesElectricity purchases and sales$61 $(90)$(29)Income ApproachHourly price curve shape (c)$to$85 $43 
MWhElectricity purchases and salesMWh
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and heat rates (d)$25 to$125 $75 
MWh
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and Heat Rates (d)
MWhMWh
OptionsOptions38 (56)(18)Option Pricing ModelGas to power correlation (e)30 %to100 %64 %Options(237)(237)(236)(236)Option Pricing ModelOption Pricing ModelNatural gas to power correlation (e)10 %to100 %55 %
Power and gas volatility (e)%to665 %336 %Power and natural gas volatility (e)10 %to870 %441 %
Financial transmission rightsFinancial transmission rights92 (16)76 Market Approach (f)Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g)$(5)to$50 $22 
MWhFinancial transmission rightsMWh
Natural gas
Natural gasMMBtu
Illiquid delivery periods (i)
MMBtuMMBtu
Other (j)
Other (h)14 (21)(7)
Other (j)
Other (j)
TotalTotal$205 $(183)$22 
Total
Total

December 31, 2019
Fair Value
December 31, 2022December 31, 2022
Fair Value
Contract Type (a)
Contract Type (a)
Contract Type (a)Contract Type (a)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)AssetsLiabilitiesTotalValuation TechniqueSignificant Unobservable InputRange (b)Average (b)
Electricity purchases and salesElectricity purchases and sales$64 $(53)$11 Income ApproachHourly price curve shape (c)$to$115 $58 
MWh
Illiquid delivery periods for ERCOT hub power prices and heat rates (d)$20 to$120 $70 
MWh
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and Heat Rates (d)
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and Heat Rates (d)
Illiquid delivery periods for hub power prices and Heat Rates (d)
MWh
Options
OptionsOptions38 (188)(150)Option Pricing ModelGas to power correlation (e)10 %to100 %55 %Options— (483)(483)(483)(483)Option Pricing ModelOption Pricing ModelNatural gas to power correlation (e)10 %to100 %56 %
Power and gas volatility (e)%to440 %223 %Power and natural gas volatility (e)%to620 %313 %
Financial transmission rightsFinancial transmission rights120 (26)94 Market Approach (f)Illiquid price differences between settlement points (g)$(10)to$40 $15 
MWh
Natural gas
Natural gas
MMBtu
Other (j)
Other (h)17 (46)(29)
Other (j)
Other (j)
TotalTotal$239 $(313)$(74)
Total
Total
____________
(a)Electricity purchase and sales contracts include power and heat rateHeat Rate positions in ERCOT, PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO, MISO and MISOCAISO regions. The forward purchase contracts (swaps and options) used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points are referred to as congestion revenue rights (CRRs) in ERCOT and financial transmission rights (FTRs) in PJM, ISO-NE, NYISO and MISO regions. Natural gas includes swaps and forward contracts. Options consist of physical electricity options, spread options swaptions and natural gas options.
(b)The range of the inputs may be influenced by factors such as time of day, delivery period, season and location. The average represents the arithmetic average of the underlying inputs and is not weighted by the related fair value or notional amount.
134

Table of Contents
(c)Primarily based on the historical range of forward average hourly ERCOT North Hub and ERCOT South and West Zone prices.
(d)Primarily based on historical forward ERCOT and PJM power prices and ERCOT heat rateHeat Rate variability.
(e)Primarily based on the historical forward correlation and volatility within ERCOT.ERCOT and PJM.
(f)While we use the market approach, there is insufficient market data to consider the valuation liquid.
(g)Primarily based on the historical price differences between settlement points within ERCOT hubs and load zones.
(h)Primarily based on the historical forward PJM and Northeast natural gas basis prices and fixed prices.
(i)Primarily based on the historical forward natural gas fixed prices.
(j)Other includes contracts for natural gas, coal and environmental allowances.
147

Table of Contents

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021. See the table below for discussion of transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021.

The following table presents the changes in fair value of the Level 3 assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018.2021.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net liability balance at beginning of period$(74)$(135)$(53)
Total unrealized valuation gains (losses)(5)(363)
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Net asset (liability) balance at beginning of period
Total unrealized valuation losses
Purchases, issuances and settlements (a):Purchases, issuances and settlements (a):
Purchases
Purchases
PurchasesPurchases164 176 146 
IssuancesIssuances(28)(81)(41)
SettlementsSettlements(90)(64)76 
Transfers into Level 3 (b)Transfers into Level 3 (b)(2)10 
Transfers out of Level 3 (b)Transfers out of Level 3 (b)57 12 133 
Net liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger(37)
Net change (c)Net change (c)96 61 (82)
Net asset (liability) balance at end of period$22 $(74)$(135)
Unrealized valuation gains (losses) relating to instruments held at end of period$18 $(61)$(174)
Net change (c)
Net change (c)
Net (liability) balance at end of period
Unrealized valuation losses relating to instruments held at end of period
____________
(a)Settlements reflect reversals of unrealized mark-to-market valuations previously recognized in net income. Purchases and issuances reflect option premiums paid or received, including CRRs and FTRs.
(b)Includes transfers due to changes in the observability of significant inputs. All Level 3 transfers during the periods presented are in and out of Level 2. For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, transfers into Level 3 primarily consist of power derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become unobservable and transfers out of Level 3 primarily consist of gas, power and coal derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become observable. observable. For the yearsyear ended December 31, 20192022, transfers into Level 3 primarily consist of power and 2018,coal derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become unobservable and transfers out of Level 3 primarily consist of power, natural gas, and coal derivatives where forward pricing inputs have become observable.
(c)Activity excludes change in fair value in the month positions settle. Substantially all changes in values of commodity contracts (excluding the net liabilities assumed in connection with the Merger) are reported as operating revenues in our consolidated statements of operations.

16.17.COMMODITY AND OTHER DERIVATIVE CONTRACTUAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

Strategic Use of Derivatives

We transact in derivative instruments, such as options, swaps, futures and forward contracts, to manage our exposure to commodity price and interest rate risk.volatility. Although we do engage in economic hedging activities to manage our exposure related to commodity price fluctuations through the use of financial and physical derivative contracts, we have no derivative positions accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges as of December 31, 2023 and 2022. All changes in the fair values of our derivative contracts are recognized as gains or losses in the earnings of the periods in which they occur. See Note 1516 for a discussion of the fair value of derivatives.

135

Table of Contents
Commodity Hedging and Trading Activity

We utilize natural gas and electricity derivatives to reduce exposure to changes in electricity prices primarily to hedge future revenues from electricity sales from our generation assets and to hedge future purchased power costs for our retail operations. We also utilize short-term electricity, natural gas, coal and emissions derivative instruments for fuel hedging and other purposes. Counterparties to these transactions include energy companies, financial institutions, electric utilities, independent power producers, fuel oil and natural gas producers, local distribution companies and energy marketing companies. Unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments as well as realized gains and losses upon settlement of the instruments are reported in our consolidated statements of operations in operating revenues and fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees.

148

Table of Contents
Interest Rate Swaps

Interest rate swap agreements are used to reduce exposure to interest rate changes by converting floating-rate interest rates to fixed rates, thereby hedging future interest costs and related cash flows. Unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in the fair value of the swaps as well as realized gains and losses upon settlement of the swaps are reported in our consolidated statements of operations in interest expense and related charges. During 2019, Vistra entered into $2.12 billion of newSee Note 12 for details on our interest rate swaps pursuant to which Vistra will pay a variable rate and receive a fixed rate. The termsoutstanding as of these new swaps were matched against the terms of certain existing swaps, effectively offsetting the hedge of the existing swaps and fixing the out-of-the-money position of such swaps. These matched swaps will settle over time, in accordance with the original contractual terms. The remaining existing swaps continue to hedge our exposure on $2.30 billion of debt through July 2026.December 31, 2023.

Financial Statement Effects of Derivatives

Substantially all derivative contractual assets and liabilities are accounted for under mark-to-market accounting consistent with accounting standards related to derivative instruments and hedging activities. The following tables provide detail of derivative contractual assets and liabilities as reported in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20202023 and 2019.2022. Derivative asset and liability totals represent the net value of the contract, while the balance sheet totals represent the gross value of the contract.
December 31, 2020
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023
Derivative Assets
Commodity Contracts
Commodity Contracts
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
Current assetsCurrent assets$665 $19 $64 $$748 
Noncurrent assetsNoncurrent assets197 53 258 
Current liabilitiesCurrent liabilities(1)(717)(71)(789)
Noncurrent liabilitiesNoncurrent liabilities(3)(288)(333)(624)
Net assets (liabilities)Net assets (liabilities)$858 $72 $(933)$(404)$(407)
December 31, 2022
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
Current assets$4,442 $92 $$— $4,538 
Noncurrent assets656 43 — 702 
Current liabilities(1)— (6,562)(47)(6,610)
Noncurrent liabilities(5)— (1,685)(36)(1,726)
Net assets (liabilities)$5,092 $135 $(8,240)$(83)$(3,096)

December 31, 2019
Derivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Commodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsCommodity ContractsInterest Rate SwapsTotal
Current assets$1,323 $$10 $$1,333 
Noncurrent assets136 136 
Current liabilities(1)(1,510)(18)(1,529)
Noncurrent liabilities(237)(159)(396)
Net assets (liabilities)$1,458 $$(1,737)$(177)$(456)
136

Table of Contents

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no derivative positions accounted for as cash flow or fair value hedges.

The following table presents the pretaxpre-tax effect of derivative gains (losses) on net income, including realized and unrealized effects. Amount represents changes in fair value of positions in the derivative portfolio during the period, as realized amounts related to positions settled are assumed to equal reversals of previously recorded unrealized amounts.
Year Ended December 31,
Derivative (consolidated statements of operations presentation)202320222021
Commodity contracts (Operating revenues) (a)$(758)$(4,103)$(1,196)
Commodity contracts (Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees) (b)(395)375 732 
Interest rate swaps (Interest expense and related charges) (c)42 234 81 
Net gain (loss)$(1,111)$(3,494)$(383)
____________
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2023, includes unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions of $714 million. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, includes unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions of $2.163 billion and $1.191 billion, respectively.
(b)For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, includes unrealized net losses from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions of $224 million and $347 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2021, includes unrealized net gains from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions of $432 million.
(c)For the year ended December 31, 2023, includes unrealized net losses on mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps of $36 million. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, includes unrealized gains on mark-to-market valuations of interest rate swaps of $250 million and $134 million, respectively.

Year Ended December 31,
Derivative (consolidated statements of operations presentation)202020192018
Commodity contracts (Operating revenues)$241 $339 $(855)
Commodity contracts (Fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees)(1)18 
Interest rate swaps (Interest expense and related charges)(196)(217)(11)
Net gain (loss)$49 $121 $(848)

149

Table of Contents
Balance Sheet Presentation of Derivatives

We elect to report derivative assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis without taking into consideration netting arrangements we have with counterparties to those derivatives. We maintain standardized master netting agreements with certain counterparties that allow for the right to offset assets and liabilities and collateral in order to reduce credit exposure between us and the counterparty. These agreements contain specific language related to margin requirements, monthly settlement netting, cross-commodity netting and early termination netting, which is negotiated with the contract counterparty.

Generally, margin deposits that contractually offset these derivative instruments are reported separately in our consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of certain margin amounts related to changes in fair value on CME transactions that are legally characterized as settlement of forward exposure rather than collateral. Margin deposits received from counterparties are primarily used for working capital or other general corporate purposes.

137

Table of Contents
The following tables reconcile our derivative assets and liabilities on a contract basis to net amounts after taking into consideration netting arrangements with counterparties and financial collateral:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net AmountsDerivative Assets
and Liabilities
Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net Amounts
December 31, 2023December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
Derivative Assets
and Liabilities
Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net AmountsDerivative Assets
and Liabilities
Offsetting Instruments (a)Cash Collateral (Received) Pledged (b)Net Amounts
Derivative assets:Derivative assets:
Commodity contracts
Commodity contracts
Commodity contractsCommodity contracts$858 $(667)$(11)$180 $1,458 $(1,113)$$345 
Interest rate swapsInterest rate swaps72 (72)
Total derivative assetsTotal derivative assets930 (739)(11)180 1,458 (1,113)345 
Derivative liabilities:Derivative liabilities:
Commodity contractsCommodity contracts(933)667 138 (128)(1,737)1,113 40 (584)
Commodity contracts
Commodity contracts
Interest rate swapsInterest rate swaps(404)72 (332)(177)(177)
Total derivative liabilitiesTotal derivative liabilities(1,337)739 138 (460)(1,914)1,113 40 (761)
Net amountsNet amounts$(407)$— $127 $(280)$(456)$— $40 $(416)
____________
(a)Amounts presented exclude trade accounts receivable and payable related to settled financial instruments.
(b)Represents cash amounts received or pledged pursuant to a master netting arrangement, including fair value-based margin requirements, and, to a lesser extent, initial margin requirements.

150

Table of Contents
Derivative Volumes

The following table presents the gross notional amounts of derivative volumes atby commodity, excluding those derivatives that qualified for the NPNS or other scope exceptions permitted by ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019:2022:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
December 31, 2023
Derivative type
Derivative type
Derivative typeDerivative typeNotional VolumeUnit of MeasureNotional VolumeUnit of Measure
Natural gas (a)Natural gas (a)5,264 6,160 Million MMBtuNatural gas (a)5,335 6,007 6,007 Million MMBtuMillion MMBtu
ElectricityElectricity438,863 428,367 GWhElectricity800,001 754,762 754,762 GWhGWh
Financial transmission rights (b)Financial transmission rights (b)217,350 199,648 GWhFinancial transmission rights (b)250,895 225,845 225,845 GWhGWh
CoalCoal20 22 Million U.S. tonsCoal35 48 48 Million U.S. tonsMillion U.S. tons
Fuel oilFuel oil176 33 Million gallonsFuel oil105 105 Million gallonsMillion gallons
EmissionsEmissions20 Million tons
Emissions
Emissions24 40 Million U.S. tons
Renewable energy certificatesRenewable energy certificates18 11 Million certificatesRenewable energy certificates29 31 31 Million certificatesMillion certificates
Interest rate swaps – variable/fixed (c)Interest rate swaps – variable/fixed (c)$6,720 $6,720 Million U.S. dollarsInterest rate swaps – variable/fixed (c)$5,225 $$6,720 Million U.S. dollarsMillion U.S. dollars
Interest rate swaps - fixed/variable (c)Interest rate swaps - fixed/variable (c)$2,120 $2,120 Million U.S. dollarsInterest rate swaps - fixed/variable (c)$1,300 $$2,120 Million U.S. dollarsMillion U.S. dollars
____________
(a)Represents gross notional forward sales, purchases and options transactions, locational basis swaps and other natural gas transactions.
(b)Represents gross forward purchases associated with instruments used to hedge electricity price differences between settlement points within regions.
(c)Includes notional amounts of interest rate swaps with maturity dates through July 2026.December 2030.

Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features of Derivatives

Our derivative contracts may contain certain credit risk-related contingent features that could trigger liquidity requirements in the form of cash collateral, letters of credit or some other form of credit enhancement. Certain of these agreements require the posting of collateral if our credit rating is downgraded by one or more credit rating agencies or include cross-default contractual provisions that could result in the settlement of such contracts if there was a failure under other financing arrangements related to payment terms or other covenants.

138

Table of Contents
The following table presents the commodity derivative liabilities subject to credit risk-related contingent features that are not fully collateralized:
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Fair value of derivative contract liabilities (a)Fair value of derivative contract liabilities (a)$(679)$(692)
Offsetting fair value under netting arrangements (b)Offsetting fair value under netting arrangements (b)262 167 
Cash collateral and letters of creditCash collateral and letters of credit35 67 
Liquidity exposureLiquidity exposure$(382)$(458)
____________
(a)Excludes fair value of contracts that contain contingent features that do not provide specific amounts to be posted if features are triggered, including provisions that generally provide the right to request additional collateral (material adverse change, performance assurance and other clauses).
(b)Amounts include the offsetting fair value of in-the-money derivative contracts and net accounts receivable under master netting arrangements.

Concentrations of Credit Risk Related to Derivatives

We have concentrations of credit risk with the counterparties to our derivative contracts. AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, total credit risk exposure to all counterparties related to derivative contracts totaled $1.085$4.681 billion (including associated accounts receivable). The net exposure to those counterparties totaled $293$727 million at December 31, 20202023 after taking into effect netting arrangements, setoff provisions and collateral, with the largest net exposure to a single counterparty totaling $85$235 million. AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, the credit risk exposure to the banking and financial sector represented 65%80% of the total credit risk exposure and 18%28% of the net exposure.

151

Table of Contents
Exposure to banking and financial sector counterparties is considered to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance because all of this exposure is with counterparties with investment grade credit ratings. However, this concentration increases the risk that a default by any of these counterparties would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. The transactions with these counterparties contain certain provisions that would require the counterparties to post collateral in the event of a material downgrade in their credit rating.

We maintain credit risk policies with regard to our counterparties to minimize overall credit risk. These policies authorize specific risk mitigation tools including, but not limited to, use of standardized master agreements that allow for netting of positive and negative exposures associated with a single counterparty. Credit enhancements such as parent guarantees, letters of credit, surety bonds, liens on assets and margin deposits are also utilized. Prospective material changes in the payment history or financial condition of a counterparty or downgrade of its credit quality result in the reassessment of the credit limit with that counterparty. The process can result in the subsequent reduction of the credit limit or a request for additional financial assurances. An event of default by one or more counterparties could subsequently result in termination-related settlement payments that reduce available liquidity if amounts are owed to the counterparties related to the derivative contracts or delays in receipts of expected settlements if the counterparties owe amounts to us.

17.18.PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (OPEB) PLANS

Vistra is the plan sponsor of the Vistra Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan), which provides benefits to eligible employees of its subsidiaries. Oncor is a participant in the Retirement Plan. As Vistra accounts for its interests in the Retirement Plan as a multiple employer plan, only Vistra's share of the plan assets and obligations are reported in the pension benefit information presented below. After amendments in 2012, employees in the Retirement Plan now consist entirely of participants who were active and retired collective bargaining unit employees. The Retirement Plan is a qualified defined benefit pension plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code), and is subject to the provisions of ERISA. The Retirement Plan provides benefits to participants under one of two formulas: (i) a Cash Balance Formula under which participants earn monthly contribution credits based on their compensation and a combination of their age and years of service, plus monthly interest credits or (ii) a Traditional Retirement Plan Formula based on years of service and the average earnings of the three years of highest earnings. Under the Cash Balance Formula, future increases in earnings will not apply to prior service costs. It is our policy to fund the Retirement Plan assets only to the extent required under existing federal regulations.

139

Table of Contents
Vistra and our participating subsidiaries offer other postretirement employee benefits (OPEB) in the form of certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees and their eligible dependents. The retiree contributions required for such coverage vary based on a formula depending on the retiree's age and years of service.

Prior to the Merger, Dynegy provided pension and OPEB benefits to certain of its employees and retirees. At the Merger Date, Vistra assumed these plans and the excess of the benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets was recognized as a liability (see Note 2). Benefit obligations assumed totaled $539 million and the fair value of plan assets assumed totaled $459 million, and the net unfunded liability was recorded as $15 million to other noncurrent assets, $2 million to other current liabilities and $93 million to other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

Effective January 1, 2018, Vistra entered into a contractual arrangement with Oncor whereby the costs associated with providing OPEB coverage for certain retirees (Split Participants) whose employment included service with both the regulated businesses of Oncor (or its predecessors) and the non-regulated businesses of Vistra (or its predecessors) are split between Oncor and Vistra. As Vistra accounts for its interest in this OPEB plan as a multiple employer plan, only Vistra's share of the plan assets and obligations are reported in the OPEB information presented below. In addition, Vistra is the sponsor of OPEB plans that certain EFH Corp. and Dynegy retirees participate in.

Pension and OPEB Costs
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Pension costsPension costs$11 $$14 
OPEB costsOPEB costs11 
Total benefit costs recognized as expenseTotal benefit costs recognized as expense$18 $20 $23 

152

Table of Contents
Market-Related Value of Assets Held in Pension Benefit Trusts

We use the calculated value method to determine the market-related value of the assets held in the trust for purposes of calculating pension costs. We include all gains or losses in the market-related value of assets over a rolling four-year period. Each year, 25% of such gains and losses for the current year and for each of the preceding three years is included in the market-related value. Each year, the market-related value of assets is increased for contributions to the plan and investment income and is decreased for benefit payments and expenses for that year.

140

Table of Contents
Detailed Information Regarding Pension Plans and OPEB Benefits

The following information is based on a December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 measurement dates:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Pension Cost:
Discount rate (Vistra Plan)3.24 %4.37 %3.74 %
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.24 %4.37 %4.05 %
Expected return on plan assets (Vistra Plan)4.44 %4.80 %4.56 %
Expected return on plan assets (Dynegy Plan)5.28 %5.31 %5.94 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Plan)5.45 %5.56 %4.74 %
Expected rate of compensation increase (Vistra Plan)3.29 %3.35 %3.62 %
Expected rate of compensation increase (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.29 %3.35 %3.50 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Vistra Plan)3.50 %3.50 %3.50 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans (Dynegy Plan and EEI Plan)3.50 %3.50 %4.25 %
Components of Net Pension Cost:
Service cost$$$15 
Interest cost20 25 21 
Expected return on assets(23)(26)(23)
Amortization of unrecognized amounts
Immediate pension cost
Net periodic pension cost$11 $$14 
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:
Net loss$17 $11 $14 
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$28 $20 $28 
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate2.50 %3.24 %4.37 %
Expected rate of compensation increase3.41 %3.29 %3.35 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans3.00 %3.50 %3.50 %
Retirement PlanOPEB Plans
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
202320222021202320222021
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Pension and Benefit Cost:
Discount rate5.16 %2.84 %2.50 %5.18 %2.87 %2.51 %
Expected rate of compensation increase3.79 %3.49 %3.41 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance3.00 %3.00 %3.00 %
Expected return on plan assets (Vistra Plan)5.85 %4.24 %3.77 %
Expected return on plan assets (Dynegy Plan)5.85 %4.77 %4.42 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Plan)— %4.92 %4.72 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Union)3.89 %3.92 %6.79 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Salaried)4.85 %3.41 %2.95 %
Components of Net Pension and Benefit Cost:
Service cost$$$$$$
Interest cost21 17 16 
Expected return on assets(18)(19)(18)(1)(1)(2)
Amortization of unrecognized amounts, net— — — 
Net periodic pension and OPEB cost$$$$$$
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:
Net (gain) loss$$(16)$(27)$— $(22)$(10)
Prior service (credit) cost(6)— — — (2)
Curtailment and settlements— — (2)— — — 
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$10 $(5)$(23)$$(18)$(4)
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at Period End:
Discount rate4.97 %5.16 %2.84 %4.98 %5.18 %2.87 %
Expected rate of compensation increase3.64 %3.79 %3.49 %
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plans3.50 %3.00 %3.00 %

Net Actuarial Gains (Losses)

Retirement Plan

For the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, the net actuarial loss of $29$5 million that occurred for the pension plans during 2023 was driven bya result of losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and losses attributable to actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions, plan experience different than expected, and plan amendments,settlements, partially offset by gainsa gain attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy updates, annuity purchases,expectations. The Dynegy Pension Plan was amended during 2023 to extend the lump sum windowsinterest rates from calendar year 2022 through 2024 and plan experience different than expected.provide in-service distributions for certain eligible employees as of December 31, 2022. As a result, the pension obligation increased by $1 million and a prior service cost was created to be amortized over 2 years.

For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, the net actuarial lossgain of $16 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions, annuity purchases, plan amendments and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations and life expectancy updates.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, the net actuarial loss of $14 million was driven by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, economicgains attributable to actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions and life expectancy projection updates.plan experience different than expected, partially offset by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations and settlements.

153141

Table of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the net actuarial gain of $24 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, partially offset by losses attributable to demographic assumption updates to reflect recent plan experience, actuarial assumption updates to reflect current market conditions, plan amendments, settlements and plan experience different than expected.

Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Change in Pension Obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$674 $615 
Service cost
Interest cost20 25 
Lump-sum window(6)
Annuity purchase(29)(18)
Actuarial loss46 93 
Benefits paid(68)(48)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$643 $674 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year$639 $669 
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of period$528 $490 
Employer contributions16 
Lump-sum window(6)
Annuity purchase(29)(18)
Actual gain on assets40 102 
Benefits paid(64)(46)
Fair value of assets at end of year$485 $528 
Funded Status:
Projected pension benefit obligation$(643)$(674)
Fair value of assets485 528 
Funded status at end of year$(158)$(146)
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of:
Other noncurrent liabilities$(158)$(146)
Net liability recognized$(158)$(146)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:
Net (loss)$(42)$(24)
OPEB Plans

For the year ended December 31, 2023, the immaterial net actuarial loss that occurred for the OPEB plans during 2023 was a result of losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, partially offset by gains attributable to plan experience different than expected, updates to health care assumptions, and actual asset performance exceeding expectations.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, the net actuarial gain of $22 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, plan experience different than expected and updates to health care assumptions, partially offset by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations.

For the period ended December 31, 2021, the net actuarial gain of $7 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, plan experience different than expected, updates to health care claims and trend assumptions and actual asset performance exceeding expectations, partially offset by losses attributable to demographic assumption updates and life expectancy updates.

142

Table of Contents
Retirement PlanOPEB Plans
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202220232022
Change in Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period$449 $605 $110 $146 
Service cost
Interest cost21 17 
Participant contributions— — 
Plan amendments— — 
Actuarial (gain) loss10 (113)(30)
Benefits paid(59)(73)(12)(13)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$425 $449 $108 $110 
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year$422 $447 $— $— 
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of period$320 $470 $29 $39 
Employer contributions— — 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual gain (loss) on assets24 (77)(6)
Transfers— — (19)(2)
Benefits paid(59)(73)(12)(13)
Fair value of assets at end of year$285 $320 $12 $29 
Funded Status:
Projected benefit obligation$(425)$(449)$(108)$(110)
Fair value of assets285 320 12 29 
Funded status at end of year$(140)$(129)$(96)$(81)
Amounts Recognized in the Balance Sheet Consist of:
Investments$— $— $$20 
Other current liabilities— — (9)(8)
Other noncurrent liabilities(140)(129)(90)(93)
Net liability recognized$(140)$(129)$(96)$(81)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:
Net actuarial (gain) loss$$(4)$(15)$(15)
Prior services cost
Net (income) loss and prior service cost$$$(14)$(14)

143

Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurement of Pension and OPEB Plan Assets

Retirement Plan

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, all of the Retirement Plan assets were measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) except as noted and consisted of the following:
December 31,
20232022
Asset Category:
Interest-bearing cash (a)$— $
Cash commingled trusts
Equity securities:
Global equities82 80 
Fixed income securities:
Corporate bonds (b)82 107 
Government bonds54 44 
Other (c)18 24 
Real estate28 43 
Hedge funds17 16 
Total assets measured at net asset value$285 $320 
___________
(a)Interest -bearing cash is classified as Level 2.
(b)Substantially all corporate bonds are rated investment grade by a major ratings agency such as Moody's.
(c)Consists primarily of high-yield bonds, emerging market debt, bank loans, securitized bonds and private investment grade fixed income.

OPEB Plans

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Vistra OPEB plan assets measured at fair value totaled $12 million and $29 million, respectively. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, assets consisted of $9 million and $28 million, respectively, of comingled funds valued at net asset value and $3 million and $1 million, respectively, of municipal bond and cash equivalent mutual funds classified as Level 1.

Pension Plans with Projected Benefit Obligations (PBO) and Accumulated Benefit Obligations (ABO) in Excess of Plan Assets

The following table provides information regarding pension plans with projected benefit obligation (PBO)PBO and accumulated benefit obligation (ABO)ABO in excess of the fair value of plan assets.
December 31,
20202019
Pension Plans with PBO and ABO in Excess Of Plan Assets:
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Pension Plans with PBO and ABO in Excess of Plan Assets:
Projected benefit obligations
Projected benefit obligations
Projected benefit obligationsProjected benefit obligations$643 $674 
Accumulated benefit obligationAccumulated benefit obligation$639 $669 
Plan assetsPlan assets$485 $528 

154

Table of Contents
PensionRetirement Plan Investment Strategy and Asset Allocations

Our investment objective for the Retirement Plan is to invest in a suitable mix of assets to meet the future benefit obligations at an acceptable level of risk, while minimizing the volatility of contributions. Fixed income securities held primarily consist of corporate bonds from a diversified range of companies, U.S. Treasuries and agency securities and money market instruments. Equity securities are held to enhance returns by participating in a wide range of investment opportunities. International equity securities are used to further diversify the equity portfolio and may include investments in both developed and emerging markets. Real estate, hedge funds and credit strategies (primarily high yield bonds and emerging market debt) provide additional portfolio diversification and return potential.

144

Table of Contents
The target asset allocation ranges of pension plan investments by asset category are as follows:
Target Allocation Ranges
Target Allocation Ranges
Target Allocation Ranges
Target Allocation Ranges
Asset Category:Asset Category:Vistra PlanDynegy PlanEEI Plan
Fixed income65 %-75%45 %-55%40 %-50%
Fixed income securities
Fixed income securities
Fixed income securities
Global equity securities
Global equity securities
Global equity securitiesGlobal equity securities16 %-24%30 %-38%34 %-42%
Real estateReal estate%-8%%-12%10 %-14%
Real estate
Real estate
Credit strategiesCredit strategies%-7%%-10%%-11%
Credit strategies
Credit strategies
Hedge funds
Hedge funds
Hedge funds

Retirement Plan Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Assets Assumption

The Retirement Plan strategic asset allocation is determined in conjunction with the plan's advisors and utilizes a comprehensive Asset-Liability modeling approach to evaluate potential long-term outcomes of various investment strategies. The study incorporates long-term rate of return assumptions for each asset class based on historical and future expected asset class returns, current market conditions, rate of inflation, current prospects for economic growth, and taking into account the diversification benefits of investing in multiple asset classes and potential benefits of employing active investment management.
Retirement Plan
Expected Long-Term Rate of Return
Retirement Plan
Retirement Plan
Retirement Plan
Expected Long-Term Rate of ReturnExpected Long-Term Rate of Return
Asset Class:Asset Class:Vistra PlanDynegy PlanEEI Plan
Fixed income securitiesFixed income securities2.4 %2.3 %2.3 %
Fixed income securities
Fixed income securities
Global equity securities
Global equity securities
Global equity securitiesGlobal equity securities7.3 %7.3 %7.3 %
Real estateReal estate5.6 %5.6 %5.6 %
Real estate
Real estate
Credit strategiesCredit strategies4.8 %4.8 %4.8 %
Credit strategies
Credit strategies
Hedge funds
Hedge funds
Hedge funds
Weighted averageWeighted average3.8 %4.4 %4.7 %
Weighted average
Weighted average

Fair Value Measurement of PensionBenefit Plan Assets

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, all of the Retirement Plan assets were measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) and consisted of the following:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Asset Category:
Cash commingled trusts11 10 
Equity securities:
Global equities153 169 
Fixed income securities:
Corporate bonds (a)207 211 
Government bonds37 50 
Other (b)32 37 
Real estate45 51 
Total assets measured at net asset value$485 $528 
___________
(a)Substantially all corporate bonds are rated investment grade by a major ratings agency such as Moody's.
(b)Consists primarily of high-yield bonds, emerging market debt and bank loans.

155

Table of Contents
Detailed Information Regarding Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

The following OPEB information is based on a December 31, 2020 measurement date:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
Discount rate (Vistra Plan)3.25 %4.35 %3.67 %
Discount rate (Split-Participant Plan)3.25 %4.35 %3.67 %
Discount rate (Dynegy Plan)3.25 %4.35 %4.04 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Union)7.07 %5.36 %5.10 %
Expected return on plan assets (EEI Salaried)3.43 %4.70 %4.47 %
Components of Net Postretirement Benefit Cost:
Service cost$$$
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets(2)(1)(1)
Amortization of unrecognized amounts
Immediate postretirement benefit cost(1)
Net periodic OPEB cost$$11 $
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income:
Net (gain) loss and prior service (credit) cost$$$(6)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$12 $11 $
Assumptions Used to Determine Benefit Obligations at Period End:
Discount rate2.51 %3.25 %4.35 %

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the net actuarial loss of $10 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy updates and updates to health care claims and trend assumptions.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net actuarial loss of $5 million was driven by losses attributable to decreasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets and plan experience different than expected, partially offset by gains attributable to actual asset performance exceeding expectations, life expectancy changes, updates to health care related assumptions and changes due to the repeal of certain AffordableAssumed Health Care Act fees.

For the period ended December 31, 2018, the net actuarial loss of $7 million was driven by gains attributable to increasing discount rates due to changes in the corporate bond markets, life expectancy projection updates and updates to health care related assumptions, partially offset by losses attributable to actual asset performance falling short of expectations and plan experience different than expected.

156

Table of Contents

Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Change in Postretirement Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year$151 $144 
Service cost
Interest cost
Participant contributions
Actuarial loss12 10 
Benefits paid(15)(14)
Benefit obligation at end of year$157 $151 
Change in Plan Assets:
Fair value of assets at beginning of year$34 $29 
Employer contributions
Participant contributions
Benefits paid(13)(13)
Actual gain on assets
Fair value of assets at end of year$37 $34 
Funded Status:
Benefit obligation$(157)$(151)
Fair value of assets37 34 
Funded status at end of year$(120)$(117)
Amounts Recognized on the Balance Sheet Consist of:
Other noncurrent assets$23 $18 
Other current liabilities$(9)$(9)
Other noncurrent liabilities(134)(126)
Net liability recognized$(120)$(117)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Consist of:
Net loss and prior service cost$20 $15 
Cost Trend Rates

The following tables provide information regarding the assumed health care cost trend rates.
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Not Medicare Eligible:Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Not Medicare Eligible:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next yearHealth care cost trend rate assumed for next year6.20 %6.40 %7.00 %6.80 %
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rateYear that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20292029Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20332032
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Medicare Eligible:Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates-Medicare Eligible:
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Vistra Plan, EEI Union and EEI Salaried)9.10 %8.60 %
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Vistra Plan)
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Vistra Plan)
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Vistra Plan)12.90 %10.30 %
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Split-Participant Plan)Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Split-Participant Plan)8.80 %8.30 %Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (Split-Participant Plan)12.30 %10.00 %
Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %Rate to which the cost trend is expected to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.50 %4.50 %
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rateYear that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20302029Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate20332032

Fair Value Measurement of OPEB Plan Assets

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Vistra OPEB plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis totaled $37 million and $34 million, respectively, and consisted of $29 million and $26 million, respectively, of U.S. equities classified as Level 1 and $8 million and $8 million, respectively, of U.S. Treasuries and municipal bonds classified as Level 2.

157

Table of Contents
Significant Concentrations of Risk

The plans' investments are exposed to risks such as interest rate, capital market and credit risks. We seek to optimize return on investment consistent with levels of liquidity and investment risk which are prudent and reasonable, given prevailing capital market conditions and other factors specific to us. While we recognize the importance of return, investments will be diversified in order to minimize the risk of large losses unless, under the circumstances, it is clearly prudent not to do so. There are also various restrictions and guidelines in place including limitations on types of investments allowed and portfolio weightings for certain investment securities to assist in the mitigation of the risk of large losses.

145

Table of Contents
Assumed Discount Rate

We selected the assumed discount rates using the Aon AA Above Median yield curve, which is based on corporate bond yields and at December 31, 20202023 consisted of 305509 corporate bonds with an average rating of AA using Moody's, S&P and Fitch ratings.

Contributions

Contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 totaled $16 million, 0zero, zero and $12$1 million, respectively, and $1 millioncontributions in contributions2024 are expected to be made in 2021.total $14 million. OPEB plan funding for each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 20182021 totaled $9 million, $9 million and $8 million, respectively, and funding in 20212024 is expected to total $9 million.

Future Benefit Payments

Estimated future benefit payments to beneficiaries are as follows:
202120222023202420252026-2030
2024202420252026202720282029-2033
Pension benefitsPension benefits$49 $43 $43 $40 $52 $188 
OPEBOPEB$10 $10 $10 $10 $$41 

Qualified Savings Plans

Our employees may participate in a qualified savings plan (the Thrift Plan). This plan is a participant-directed defined contribution plan intended to qualify under Section 401(a) of the Code and is subject to the provisions of ERISA. Under the terms of the Thrift Plan, employees who do not earn more than the IRS threshold compensation limit used to determine highly compensated employees may contribute, through pre-tax salary deferrals and/or after-tax payroll deductions, the lesser of 75% of their regular salary or wages or the maximum amount permitted under applicable law. Employees who earn more than such threshold may contribute from 1% to 20% of their regular salary or wages. Employer matching contributions are also made in an amount equal to 100% (75% for employees covered under the traditional formula in the Retirement Plan) of the first 6% of employee contributions. Employer matching contributions are made in cash and may be allocated by participants to any of the plan's investment options.

At the Merger Date, Vistra assumed Dynegy's participant-directed defined contribution plan. In January 2019, this plan was merged into the Thrift Plan.

Aggregate employer contributions to the qualified savings plans totaled $34$33 million, $27$33 million and $24$34 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

158

Table of Contents

18.19.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Vistra 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan

On the Effective Date, the Vistra board of directors (Board)Board adopted the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (2016 Incentive Plan), under which an aggregate of 22,500,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance as equity-based awards to our non-employee directors, employees, and certain other persons. Following approval of the Board and approval by the stockholders at the 2019 annual meeting of the Company, the 2016 Incentive Plan was amended to increase the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2016 Incentive Plan to 37,500,000. The Board or any committee duly authorized by the Board will administer the 2016 Incentive Plan and has broad authority under the 2016 Incentive Plan to, among other things: (a) select participants, (b) determine the types of awards that participants are to receive and the number of shares that are to be subject to such awards and (c) establish the terms and conditions of awards, including the price (if any) to be paid for the shares of the award. The types of awards that may be granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan include stock options, RSUs, restricted stock, performance awards and other forms of awards granted or denominated in shares of Vistra common stock, as well as certain cash-based awards.

If any stock option or other stock-based award granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan expires, terminates or is canceled for any reason without having been exercised in full, the number of shares of Vistra common stock underlying any unexercised award shall again be available for awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan. If any shares of restricted stock, performance awards or other stock-based awards denominated in shares of Vistra common stock awarded under the 2016 Incentive Plan are forfeited for any reason, the number of forfeited shares shall again be available for purposes of awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan. Any award under the 2016 Incentive Plan settled in cash shall not be counted against the maximum share limitation. No awards under the 2016 Incentive Plan have been settled in cash since the Effective Date.

146

Table of Contents
As is customary in incentive plans of this nature, each share limit and the number and kind of shares available under the 2016 Incentive Plan and any outstanding awards, as well as the exercise or purchase price of awards, and performance targets under certain types of performance-based awards, are required to be adjusted in the event of certain reorganizations, mergers, combinations, recapitalizations, stock splits, stock dividends or other similar events that change the number or kind of shares outstanding, and extraordinary dividends or distributions of property to the Vistra stockholders.

Assumption of Dynegy Stock Compensation Plans

At the Merger Date, Dynegy stock options and equity-based awards outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Date were generally automatically converted upon completion of the Merger into stock options and equity-based awards, respectively, with respect to Vistra's common stock, after giving effect to the Exchange Ratio.
Instrument TypeDynegy Awards Prior to the Merger DateVistra Awards Converted at the Merger DateFair Value of Awards (a) at the Merger Date
Stock Options4,096,027 2,670,610 $10 
Restricted Stock Units5,718,148 3,056,689 61 
Performance Units1,538,133 938,721 18 
Total$89 
____________
(a)$26 million was attributable to pre-combination service and considered part of the purchase price (see Note 2). $33 million was recognized immediately as compensation expense due to accelerated vesting as a result of the Merger. $30 million will be amortized as compensation expense over the remaining service period and is recorded in additional paid in capital in the consolidated balance sheet.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

Stock-based compensation expense is reported as SG&A in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Total stock-based compensation expenseTotal stock-based compensation expense$63 $47 $73 
Income tax benefitIncome tax benefit(15)(9)(15)
Stock based-compensation expense, net of taxStock based-compensation expense, net of tax$48 $38 $58 

159

Table of Contents
Stock Options

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate used in the option valuation model was based on yields available on the grant dates for U.S. Treasury Strips with maturity consistent with the expected life assumption. The expected term of the option represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding and is based on the SEC Simplified Method (midpoint of average vesting time and contractual term). Expected volatility is based on an average of the historical, daily volatility of a peer group selected by Vistra over a period consistent with the expected life assumption ending on the grant date. We assumed noa 2.3% dividend yield in the valuation of the options granted from 2016 through 2018, and assumed 2.3% and 1.9% dividend yields in the valuation of options granted in 2020 and 2019, respectively.2020. These options may be exercised over either three- or four-yeara three year graded vesting periodsperiod and will expire 10 years from the grant date.

Issuance of Merger-related Stock Options At the Merger Date, we No options were issued 5.2 million stock options to certain members of management, which are subject to performance and service conditions for vesting. The performance condition is based on the Company's achievement of certain merger related targets which were achieved as of December 31, 2019. Compensation cost was recognized in 2018, 2019 and 2020 based on graded vesting over 4 and 5 years since the date of issuance because we estimated achievement of the target was likely to occur.2021, 2022, or 2023.

Stock options outstanding at December 31, 20202023 are all held by current or former employees. The following table summarizes our stock option activity:
Year Ended December 31, 2023Year Ended December 31, 2023
Stock Options
(in thousands)
Stock Options
(in thousands)
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Total outstanding at beginning of period
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Exercised
Stock Options
(in thousands)
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in millions)
Total outstanding at beginning of period13,535 $18.73 7.3$69.3 
Exercised
Granted3,014 $22.98 
ExercisedExercised(251)$13.62 
Forfeited or expiredForfeited or expired(268)$20.74 
Forfeited or expired
Forfeited or expired
Total outstanding at end of periodTotal outstanding at end of period16,030 $19.58 6.7$30.8 
Exercisable at December 31, 20206,871 $16.83 5.9$30.5 
Total outstanding at end of period
Total outstanding at end of period
Exercisable at December 31, 2023

AtAs of December 31, 2020, $27 million of2023, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.Plan.

Restricted Stock Units

The following table summarizes our restricted stock unit activity:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Restricted Stock Units
(in thousands)
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Year Ended December 31, 2023
Restricted Stock Units
(in thousands)
Total nonvested at beginning of period
Total nonvested at beginning of period
Total nonvested at beginning of periodTotal nonvested at beginning of period2,538 $20.99 
GrantedGranted1,209 $22.50 
Granted
Granted
Vested
Vested
VestedVested(1,456)$19.48 
ForfeitedForfeited(39)$21.89 
Forfeited
Forfeited
Total nonvested at end of period
Total nonvested at end of period
Total nonvested at end of periodTotal nonvested at end of period2,252 $22.35 

At
147

Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2020, $272023, $50 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock units granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years.

160

Table of Contents
Performance Stock Units

In October 2017, February 2019 and February 2020, we issuedWe also issue Performance Stock Units (PSUs) to certain members of management.management on an annual basis. All PSUs have a three years year performance period and a payout opportunity of 0-200% of target (100%), which is intended to be settled in shares of Vistra common stock. We recognized compensation expense associated with PSUs of $36 million, $22 million and $9 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2019,2023, we had not yet established the final terms of the previously issued PSUs relevant to vesting (scorecard, thresholds, and targets) for the entire measurement period; therefore, a grant date for financial accounting purposes had not occurred. In February 2020, the final terms were established for the October 2017 issuance and a grant date for financial accounting purposes had occurred. In March 2020, we began recognizing compensation cost ratably over the remaining 13-month vesting period for the October 2017 issuance. In February 2021, the final terms were established for the February 2019 issuance and a grant date for financial accounting purposes has occurred. In March 2021, we will begin recognizing compensation cost ratably over the remaining 12-month vesting period for the February 2019 issuance. Additional PSUs were issued to certain members of management in February 2021 with the grant date for accounting purposes not yet established. The following table summarizes our PSU activity:
Year Ended December 31, 2020
Performance Stock Units
(in thousands)
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Total nonvested at beginning of period$
Granted473 $23.43 
Vested(21)$23.43 
Forfeited(1)$23.43 
Total nonvested at end of period451 $23.43 

At December 31, 2020, $4have $33 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested performance stock units granted under the 2016 Incentive Plan is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 months.

associated with PSUs.

161

Table of Contents

19.20.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In connection with Emergence, we entered into agreements with certain of our affiliates and with parties who received shares of common stock and TRA Rights in exchange for their claims.

Registration Rights Agreement

Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, on the Effective Date, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the Registration Rights Agreement)RRA) with certain selling stockholdersstockholders. Pursuant to the RRA, we maintain a registration statement on Form S-3 providing for registration of the resale of the Vistra common stock held by such selling stockholders.

In December 2016, we filed a Form S-1 registration statement with the SEC to register for resale the shares of Vistra common stock held by certain significant stockholders pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, which was declared effective by the SEC in May 2017. The registration statement was amended in March 2018. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, in June 2018, we filed a post-effective amendment to the Form S-1 registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective by the SEC in July 2018. Among other things,addition, under the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement:

RRA, among other things, if we propose to file certain types of registration statements under the Securities Act with respect to an offering of equity securities, we will be required to use our reasonable best efforts to offer the other parties to the Registration Rights AgreementRRA the opportunity to register all or part of their shares on the terms and conditions set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement; and

the selling stockholders received the right, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, to request that we file registration statements or amend or supplement registration statements, with the SEC for an underwritten offering of all or part of their respective shares of Vistra common stock (a Demand Registration), and the Company is required to cause any such registration statement or amendment or supplement (a) to be filed with the SEC promptly and, in any event, on or before the date that is 45 days, in the case of a registration statement on Form S-1, or 30 days, in the case of a registration statement on Form S-3, after we receive the written request from the relevant selling stockholders to effectuate the Demand Registration (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement) and (b) to become effective as promptly as reasonably practicable and in any event no later than 120 days after it is initially filed.

All expenses of registration under the Registration Rights Agreement, including the legal fees of one counsel retained by or on behalf of the selling stockholders, will be paid by us. Legal fee expenses paid or accrued by Vistra on behalf of the selling stockholders totaled less than $1 million during each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.RRA.

Tax Receivable Agreement

On the Effective Date, Vistra entered into the TRA with a transfer agent on behalf of certain former first-lien creditors of TCEH. See Note 8 for discussion of the TRA.

Share Repurchase Transaction
148

In November 2018, the disinterested members of the Board considered and approved (in accordance with the Company's corporate governance guidelines) a share repurchase transaction, whereby Apollo Management Holdings L.P. (Apollo) and the Company, in a privately negotiated transaction, agreed for the Company to directly repurchase 5 million of Vistra common shares from Apollo. This purchase was part of Apollo's larger, 17 million share block trade, with the remaining 12 million shares being sold in a separate unregistered Rule 144 secondary block trade to a broker-dealer, who placed all 12 million shares with institutional investors. The Company repurchased the 5 million shares at the same discounted price (discounted from the November 19, 2018 closing price) that the participating broker paid for the 12 million shares it purchased, and the Company did not pay any additional fees to Apollo or the participating broker for the 5 million shares it repurchased.

162

Table of Contents
20.21.SEGMENT INFORMATION

The operations of Vistra are aligned into 6six reportable business segments: (i) Retail, (ii) Texas, (iii) East, (iv) West, (v) Sunset and (vi) Asset Closure. In the third quarter of 2020, Vistra updated its reportable segments to reflect changes in how the Company's Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) makes operating decisions, assesses performance and allocates resources. Management believes the revised reportable segments provide enhanced transparency into the Company's long-term sustainable assets and its commitment to managing the retirement of economically and environmentally challenged plants. The following is a summary of the updated segments:

The Sunset segment represents plants with announced retirement plans that were previously reported in the ERCOT, PJM and MISO segments. As we announced significant plant closures in the third quarter of 2020, management believes itOur Chief Executive Officer is important to have a segment which differentiates between operating plants with defined retirement plans and operating plants without defined retirement plans.
The East segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, respectively, and includes operations in PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO that were previously reported in the PJM and NY/NE segments, respectively.
The West segment represents Vistra's electricity generation operations in CAISO and was previously reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. As reflected by the Moss Landing and Oakland ESS projects (see Note 3), the Company expects to expand its operations in the West segment.

our CODM. Our CODM reviews the results of these segments separately and allocates resources to the respective segments as part of our strategic operations. A measure of assets is not applicable, as segment assets are not regularly reviewed by the CODM for evaluating performance or allocating resources.

The Retail segment is engaged in retail sales of electricity and natural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers. Substantially all of these activities are conducted by TXU Energy, Ambit, Value Based Brands, Dynegy Energy Services, Homefield Energy TriEagle Energy, Public Power and U.S. Gas & Electric across 19 states in the U.S.

The Texas and East segments are engaged in electricity generation, wholesale energy sales and purchases, commodity risk management activities, fuel production and fuel logistics management. The Texas segment represents results from Vistra's electricity generation operations in the ERCOT market, and was referred to asother than assets that are now part of the ERCOT segment prior to the third quarter of 2020.Sunset or Asset Closure segments. The East segment represents results from Vistra's electricity generation operations in the Eastern Interconnection of the U.S. electric grid, other than assets that are now part of the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, and includes operations in the PJM, ISO-NE and NYISO markets. We determined it was appropriate to aggregate results from these markets into one reportable segment, East, given similar economic characteristics.

The West segment represents results from the CAISO market, including our development of battery ESS projects at our Moss Landing and Oakland power plant sitessite (see Note 3).

The Sunset segment consists of generation plants with announced retirement plans.dates after December 31, 2023. Separately reporting the Sunset segment differentiates operating plants with announced retirement plans from our other operating plants in the Texas, East and West segments. We have allocated unrealized gains and losses on the commodity risk management activities to the Sunset segment for the generation plants that have announced retirement plans.dates after December 31, 2023.

The Asset Closure segment is engaged in the decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines (see Note 4). The Asset Closure segment also includes results from generation plants we retired in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. Upon movement of generation plant assets to either the Sunset or Asset Closure segments, prior year results are retrospectively adjusted, if the effects are material, for comparative purposes. Separately reporting the Asset Closure segment provides management with better information related to the performance and earnings power of Vistra's ongoing operations and facilitates management's focus on minimizing the cost associated with decommissioning and reclamation of retired plants and mines. We have not allocated any unrealized gains orand losses on the commodity risk management activities attributable to the Asset Closure segment for the generation plants that were retired in 2018, 20192022 and 2020.2023.

Corporate and Other represents the remaining non-segment operations consisting primarily of general corporate expenses, interest, taxes and other expenses related to our support functions that provide shared services to our operating segments.

Except as noted in Note 1, theThe accounting policies of the business segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in Note 1. Our CODM uses more than one measure to assess segment performance, including segment net income (loss), whichbut primarily focuses on Adjusted EBITDA. While we believe this is the measurea useful metric in evaluating operating performance, it is not a metric defined by U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to non-GAAP metrics presented by other companies. Adjusted EBITDA is most comparable to consolidated net income (loss) prepared based on U.S. GAAP. We account for intersegment sales and transfers as if the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at market prices. Certain shared services costs are allocated to the segments.

163149

Table of Contents


For the year ended
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and Other (b)EliminationsConsolidated
Operating revenues (a):
December 31, 2020$8,270 $4,116 $2,415 $282 $1,252 $$$(4,895)$11,443 
December 31, 20196,872 3,836 2,790 338 1,602 341 (3,970)11,809 
December 31, 20185,597 2,497 1,895 208 1,183 371 (2,607)9,144 
Depreciation and amortization:
December 31, 2020$(303)$(475)$(721)$(19)$(133)$(22)$(64)$$(1,737)
December 31, 2019(292)(472)(680)(19)(120)(57)(1,640)
December 31, 2018(318)(390)(519)(14)(81)(72)(1,394)
Operating income (loss):
December 31, 2020$312 $1,761 $73 $39 $(420)$(109)$(137)$$1,519 
December 31, 2019155 1,314 398 88 271 (107)(127)1,993 
December 31, 2018690 (103)10 35 242 (63)(320)491 
Interest expense and related charges:
December 31, 2020$(10)$$(7)$10 $(2)$$(632)$$(630)
December 31, 2019(21)(13)(4)(770)(797)
December 31, 2018(7)(12)(10)(1)(1)(612)71 (572)
Income tax (expense) benefit:
December 31, 2020$$$$$$$(266)$$(266)
December 31, 2019(290)(290)
December 31, 201845 45 
Net income (loss):
December 31, 2020$309 $1,760 $41 $50 $(414)$(101)$(1,021)$$624 
December 31, 2019134 1,342 400 88 274 (109)(1,204)926 
December 31, 2018712 (88)18 34 242 (62)(912)(56)
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel and excluding LTSA prepayments and development and growth expenditures:
December 31, 2020$$388 $71 $$46 $$91 $$600 
December 31, 2019296 61 58 69 487 
December 31, 2018280 21 36 50 396 

For the year ended
RetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and Other (a)EliminationsConsolidated
Operating revenues:
December 31, 2023$10,572 $3,823 $4,215 $914 $1,831 $— $$(6,578)$14,779 
December 31, 20229,455 3,733 3,706 336 868 384 (4,755)13,728 
December 31, 20217,871 2,790 2,587 374 661 78 — (2,284)12,077 
Depreciation and amortization:
December 31, 2023$(102)$(544)$(647)$(79)$(62)$— $(68)$— $(1,502)
December 31, 2022(145)(537)(706)(42)(66)(31)(69)— (1,596)
December 31, 2021(212)(608)(698)(60)(94)(45)(36)— (1,753)
Operating income (loss):
December 31, 2023$443 $300 $1,158 $425 $639 $(111)$(193)$— $2,661 
December 31, 20221,172 (711)(867)(250)(228)(158)(135)— (1,177)
December 31, 20212,213 (2,601)(552)(8)(67)(417)(83)— (1,515)
Interest expense and related charges:
December 31, 2023$(20)$21 $— $$(2)$(5)$(742)$— $(740)
December 31, 2022(14)20 (3)(3)(3)(371)— (368)
December 31, 2021(9)14 (15)(3)— (381)(384)
Income tax (expense) benefit:
December 31, 2023$— $— $(1)$— $— $— $(507)$— $(508)
December 31, 2022— — — — — — 350 — 350 
December 31, 2021(2)— — — — — 460 — 458 
Net income (loss):
December 31, 2023$424 $354 $1,160 $454 $633 $(6)$(1,527)$— $1,492 
December 31, 20221,158 (615)(868)(238)(230)(147)(270)— (1,210)
December 31, 20212,196 (2,512)(567)(61)(374)53 — (1,264)
Capital expenditures, including nuclear fuel and excluding LTSA prepayments and development and growth expenditures:
December 31, 2023$$500 $105 $18 $69 $— $58 $— $751 
December 31, 2022335 56 116 33 — 55 — 596 
December 31, 2021266 44 28 48 — 398 
____________
(a)The following unrealized net gains (losses) from mark-to-market valuations of commodity positions are included in operating revenues:
For the year endedRetailTexasEastWestSunsetAsset ClosureCorporate and OtherEliminations (1)Consolidated
December 31, 2020$(11)$677 $(23)$(10)$(140)$$$(329)$164 
December 31, 2019575 195 41 168 (305)682 
December 31, 2018(12)(483)(76)(15)(11)217 (380)
____________
(1) Amounts offset in fuel, purchased power costs and delivery fees in the Retail segment, with no impact to consolidated results.
(b)Income tax expense(expense) benefit is generally not reflected in net income (loss) of the segments but is reflected almost entirely in Corporate and Other net income.

income (loss).

164

Table of Contents
21.22.SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In the thirdfirst quarter of 2020,2023, we recognized an impairment lossesloss of $173$49 million related to our Kincaid coal generation facility in Illinois and $99 million related to our Zimmer coal generation facility in Ohio, each as a result of a significant decrease in the estimated useful lifeprojected operating margins of the facility, reflecting our recently announced plan to retire both facilitiesprimarily driven by the end of 2027a decrease in response to the final CCR rule (see Notes 4 and 13).projected power prices. The impairment losses areis reported in our Sunset segment and include a $260 million write-downincludes write-downs of property, plant and equipment of $45 million, write-downs of inventory of $2 million and a $12 million write-downwrite-downs of inventory. In determining the fair valueoperating lease right-of-use assets of the impaired assets, we equally weighted a market approach valuation based on transactions of similar assets and an income approach valuation discounting our projected cash flows through the respective plant retirement dates.$2 million.

150

Table of Contents
In the firstfourth quarter of 2020,2022, we recognized an impairment loss of $52$74 million related to our Joppa/EEI coalMiami Fort generation facility in IllinoisOhio as a result of a significant decrease in the projected operating margins of the facility, reflecting an increase in projected coal costs along with a decrease in projected power prices. The impairment is reported in our Sunset segment and includes write-downs of property, plant and equipment of $71 million and write-downs of inventory of $3 million.

In the second quarter of 2021, we recognized an impairment loss of $38 million related to our Zimmer generation facility in Ohio as a result of a significant decrease in the estimated useful life of the facility, reflecting a decrease in the economic forecast of the facility and changesthe inability to secure capacity revenues for the operating assumption based on lower forecasted wholesale electricity prices. We also recorded a $32 millionplant in the PJM capacity auction held in May 2021. The impairment to a capacity contract which was linked in part to the Joppa/EEI facility and therefore determined to have a significant decrease in estimated useful life. The impairments areis reported in our SunsetAsset Closure segment and include a $45 million write-downincludes write-downs of property, plant and equipment a $32of $33 million write-downand write-downs of intangible assets and a $7 million write-downinventory of inventory.$5 million.

In determining the fair value of the impaired asset groups in 2023, 2022, and 2021, we utilized the income approach described in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and, if applicable, applied weighting to prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving similar assets.

Interest Expense and Related Charges
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Interest paid/accrued$467 $576 $537 
Unrealized mark-to-market net losses on interest rate swaps155 220 
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Interest expense
Unrealized mark-to-market net (gains) losses on interest rate swaps
Amortization of debt issuance costs, discounts and premiumsAmortization of debt issuance costs, discounts and premiums18 
Facility Fee expense
Debt extinguishment (gain) lossDebt extinguishment (gain) loss(17)(21)27 
Capitalized interestCapitalized interest(21)(12)(12)
Other(a)Other(a)28 25 15 
Total interest expense and related chargesTotal interest expense and related charges$630 $797 $572 
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2023, includes $21 million of fees related to the Commitment Letter (see Note 2).

The weighted average interest rate applicable to the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities, taking into account the interest rate swaps discussed in Note 11,12, was 3.88%5.69%, 4.03%4.30% and 4.24% at3.90% as of December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

165151

Table of Contents
Other Income and Deductions
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Other income:
Insurance settlements (a)
Insurance settlements (a)
Insurance settlements (a)
Gain on sale of land (b)
Gain on TRA settlement (c)
Gain on settlement of rail transportation disputes (d)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Other income:
Insurance settlement (a)$$22 $16 
Funds released from escrow to settle pre-petition claims of our predecessor (b)
Office space sublease rental income (b)
Sale of land (c)
Interest income
Interest incomeInterest income10 18 
Interest income
All other
All other
All otherAll other18 15 
Total other incomeTotal other income$34 $56 $47 
Other deductions:Other deductions:
Loss on disposal of investment in NELP (d)$29 $$
All other
All other
All otherAll other13 15 
Total other deductionsTotal other deductions$42 $15 $
____________
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2020, $32023, $19 million reported in the West segment and $5 million in the Asset Closure segment. For the year ended December 31, 2022, $62 million reported in the Texas segment, $6 million reported in the West segment, $1 million reported in the Asset Closure segment and $1 million reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment, $2non-segment. For the year ended December 31, 2021, $80 million reported in the Texas segment, $7 million reported in the Sunset segment and $1 million reported in Corporate and Other.
(b)For the year ended December 31, 2023, $94 million reported in the Asset Closure segment and $1 million reported in the Texas segment. The amounts forFor the years ended December 31, 20192022 and 2018, respectively, are2021, reported in the TexasAsset Closure segment.
(b)(c)Reported in the Corporate and Other non-segment. Beginning January 1, 2019, our office space sublease rental income related to real estate leases is reported in SG&A expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
(c)For the year ended December 31, 2020, reported in the Asset Closure segment. For the year ended December 31, 2018, reported in the Texas segment.Other.
(d)Reported in the EastAsset Closure segment.

Restricted Cash
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Current
Assets
Noncurrent AssetsCurrent
Assets
Noncurrent Assets
Amounts related to remediation escrow accounts$19 $19 $15 $28 
Amounts related to restructuring escrow accounts43 
Amounts related to Ambit customer deposits19 
Amounts related to Ambit commodity trading agreement62 
Amounts related to Ambit letters of credit (Note 11)
Total restricted cash$19 $19 $147 $28 
December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Current
Assets
Noncurrent AssetsCurrent
Assets
Noncurrent Assets
Amounts related to remediation escrow accounts$40 $14 $37 $33 
Total restricted cash$40 $14 $37 $33 

Remediation Escrow During the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, Vistra has transferred various asset retirement obligations related to several closed plant sites to a third-party remediation company. As part of certain transfers, Vistra deposits funds into an escrow accounts, and the funds are released to the remediation company as milestones are reached in the remediation process. Amounts contractually payable to the third party in exchange for assuming the obligations are included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits.

Pre-Petition Claims — On the Effective Date, the TCEH Debtors (together with the Contributed EFH Debtors) emerged from the Chapter 11 Cases and discharged approximately $33.8 billion in liabilities subject to compromise. Initial distributions related to the allowed claims asserted against the TCEH Debtors and the Contributed EFH Debtors commenced subsequent to the Effective Date. Amounts were held in escrow to (1) distribute to holders of contingent and/or disputed unsecured claims that become allowed and/or (2) make distributions to holders of previously allowed unsecured claims, if applicable. In December 2019, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order, Docket No. 13982, sustaining the TCEH Debtors' objection to and liquidating the manifested and unmanifested asbestos claims. As of this filing, the TCEH Debtors believe they have resolved the remaining contingent and/or disputed unsecured claims, and have undertook the necessary steps to modify the claims register accordingly and made final distribution from the escrow to holders of allowed claims. At December 31, 2019, unresolved claims were recorded in Vistra's consolidated balance sheet as other current liabilities, and the related escrow balance were recorded in Vistra's consolidated balance sheet as current restricted cash. All non-priority unsecured claims, including asbestos claims arising before the Petition Date, were satisfied solely from the amounts in escrow.
166

Table of Contents
Trade Accounts Receivable
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Wholesale and retail trade accounts receivableWholesale and retail trade accounts receivable$1,324 $1,401 
Allowance for uncollectible accountsAllowance for uncollectible accounts(45)(36)
Trade accounts receivable — netTrade accounts receivable — net$1,279 $1,365 

Gross trade accounts receivable atas of December 31, 20202023 and 20192022 included unbilled retail revenues of $468$614 million and $494$607 million, respectively.

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at beginning of period (a)$42 $19 $14 
Increase for bad debt expense110 82 56 
Decrease for account write-offs(107)(65)(51)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at end of period$45 $36 $19 
____________
(a)Includes a $6 million increase recorded due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (see Note 1).

Inventories by Major Category
December 31,
20202019
Materials and supplies$260 $278 
Fuel stock236 172 
Natural gas in storage19 19 
Total inventories$515 $469 

Investments
December 31,
20202019
Nuclear plant decommissioning trust$1,674 $1,451 
Assets related to employee benefit plans (Note 17)41 37 
Land44 49 
Total investments$1,759 $1,537 

Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary

On the Merger Date, we assumed Dynegy's 50% interest in NELP, a joint venture with NextEra Energy, Inc., which indirectly owned the Bellingham NEA facility and the Sayreville facility. At December 31, 2019, our investment in NELP totaled $123 million.

In December 2019, Dynegy Northeast Generation GP, Inc. and Dynegy Northeast Associates LP, Inc., indirect subsidiaries of Vistra, entered into a transaction agreement with NELP and certain indirect subsidiaries of NextEra Energy, Inc. wherein the indirect subsidiaries of Vistra redeemed their ownership interest in NELP in exchange for 100% ownership interest in NJEA, the company which owns the Sayreville facility. The NELP Transaction was approved by FERC in February 2020, and the NELP Transaction closed on March 2, 2020. As a result of the NELP Transaction, Vistra indirectly owns 100% of the Sayreville facility and no longer has any ownership interest in the Bellingham NEA facility. A loss of $29 million was recognized in connection with the NELP Transaction, reflecting the difference between our derecognized investment in NELP and the value of our acquired 100% interest in NJEA, which was measured in accordance with ASC 805. The loss is reported in our consolidated statements of operations in other deductions.

167152

Table of Contents
Equity earnings related to our investment in NELP totaled $3 million, $14 million and $17 millionAllowance for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, recorded in equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment in our consolidated statements of operations. We received distributions totaling $3 million, $22 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at beginning of period$65 $45 $45 
Increase for bad debt expense164 179 110 
Decrease for account write-offs(168)(159)(110)
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable at end of period$61 $65 $45 

Inventories by Major Category
December 31,
20232022
Materials and supplies$289 $274 
Fuel stock420 252 
Natural gas in storage31 44 
Total inventories$740 $570 

Investments
December 31,
20232022
Nuclear decommissioning trust$1,951 $1,648 
Assets related to employee benefit plans28 30 
Land investments42 41 
Miscellaneous other14 10 
Total investments$2,035 $1,729 

Nuclear Decommissioning Trust

Investments in a trust that will be used to fund the costs to decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear generation plant are carried at fair value. Decommissioning costs are being recovered from Oncor customers as a delivery fee surcharge over the life of the plant and deposited by Vistra (and prior to the Effective Date, a subsidiary of TCEH) in the trust fund. Income and expense, including gains and losses associated with the trust fund assets and the decommissioning liability, are offset by a corresponding change in a regulatory asset/liability (currently a regulatory liability reported in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits) that will ultimately be settled through changes in Oncor's delivery fees rates. If funds recovered from Oncor's customers held in the trust fund are determined to be inadequate to decommission the Comanche Peak nuclear generation plant, Oncor would be required to collect all additional amounts from its customers, with no obligation from Vistra, provided that Vistra complied with PUCT rules and regulations regarding decommissioning trusts. A summary of the fair market value of investments in the fund follows:
Year Ended December 31,
20202019
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
Year Ended December 31,
202320232022
Debt securities (a)Debt securities (a)$618 $521 
Equity securities (b)Equity securities (b)1,056 930 
TotalTotal$1,674 $1,451 
____________
(a)The investment objective for debt securities is to invest in a diversified tax efficient portfolio with an overall portfolio rating of AA or above as graded by S&P or Aa2 by Moody's. The debt securities are heavily weighted with government and municipal bonds and investment grade corporate bonds. The debt securities had an average coupon rate of 2.91%3.19% and 3.42% at2.64% as of December 31, 20202023 and 2019,2022, respectively, and an average maturity of 1011 years and 9 years atas of both December 31, 20202023 and 2019, respectively.2022.
(b)The investment objective for equity securities is to invest tax efficiently and to match the performance of the S&P 500 Index for U.S. equity investments and the MSCI EAFE Index for non-U.S. equity investments.

153

Table of Contents
Debt securities held atas of December 31, 20202023 mature as follows: $193$296 million in one to five years, $185$142 million in five to 10 years and $240$296 million after 10 years.

The following table summarizes proceeds from sales of securities and investments in new securities.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Year Ended December 31,Year Ended December 31,
2023202320222021
Proceeds from sales of securitiesProceeds from sales of securities$433 $431 $252 
Proceeds from sales of securities
Proceeds from sales of securities
Investments in securitiesInvestments in securities$(455)$(453)$(274)


168

Table of Contents
Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Power generation and structuresPower generation and structures$15,222 $15,205 
LandLand617 622 
Office and other equipmentOffice and other equipment173 164 
TotalTotal16,012 15,991 
Less accumulated depreciationLess accumulated depreciation(3,614)(2,553)
Net of accumulated depreciationNet of accumulated depreciation12,398 13,438 
Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)Finance lease right-of-use assets (net of accumulated depreciation)182 59 
Nuclear fuel (net of accumulated amortization of $91 million and $216 million)207 197 
Nuclear fuel (net of accumulated amortization of $120 million and $152 million)
Construction work in progressConstruction work in progress712 220 
Property, plant and equipment — netProperty, plant and equipment — net$13,499 $13,914 

Depreciation expenses totaled $1.377$1.344 billion, $1.300$1.388 billion and $1.024$1.478 billion for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively.

Our property, plant and equipment consist of our power generation assets, related mining assets, information system hardware, capitalized corporate office lease space and other leasehold improvements. The estimated remaining useful lives range from 1 to 3330 years for our property, plant and equipment.


169

Table of Contents
Asset Retirement and Mining Reclamation Obligations (ARO)

These liabilities primarily relate to nuclear generation plant decommissioning, land reclamation related to lignite mining, remediation or closure of coal ash basins, and generation plant disposal costs. There is no earnings impact with respect to changes in the nuclear plant decommissioning liability, as all costs are recoverable through the regulatory process as part of delivery fees charged by Oncor. We have also identified conditional AROs for asbestos removal and disposal, which are specific to certain generation assets. However, because the period of remediation is indeterminable no removal liabilities have been recognized.

AtAs of December 31, 2020,2023, the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning totaled $1.585$1.742 billion, which is lower than the fair value of the assets contained in the nuclear decommissioning trust. Since the costs to ultimately decommission that plant are recoverable through the regulatory rate making process as part of Oncor's delivery fees, a corresponding regulatory liability has been recorded to our consolidated balance sheet of $89$209 million in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits.

154

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the changes to these obligations, reported as AROs (current and noncurrent liabilities) in our consolidated balance sheets, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018:2021:
Nuclear Plant DecommissioningMining Land ReclamationCoal Ash and OtherTotal
Liability at December 31, 2017$1,233 $438 $265 $1,936 
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning
Nuclear Plant Decommissioning
Nuclear Plant DecommissioningLand Reclamation, Coal Ash and OtherTotal
Liability at December 31, 2020
Additions:Additions:
AccretionAccretion43 22 28 93 
Adjustment for change in estimates56 (89)(33)
Obligations assumed in the Merger475 477 
Reductions:
Payments(76)(24)(100)
Liability at December 31, 20181,276 442 655 2,373 
Additions:
AccretionAccretion44 22 31 97 
Adjustment for change in estimates16 (1)15 
Adjustment for obligations assumed through acquisitions(3)(3)
Reductions:
Payments(70)(39)(109)
Liability transfers (a)(135)(135)
Liability at December 31, 20191,320 410 508 2,238 
Additions:
AccretionAccretion46 20 23 89 
Adjustment for change in estimates (b)219 (6)25 238 
Adjustment for change in estimates (a)
Reductions:Reductions:
Reductions:
Reductions:
PaymentsPayments(65)(49)(114)
Liability transfers (a)(15)(15)
Payments
Payments
Liability at December 31, 20201,585 359 492 2,436 
Liability at December 31, 2021
Liability at December 31, 2021
Liability at December 31, 2021
Additions:
Accretion
Accretion
Accretion
Adjustment for change in estimates (a)
Reductions:
Reductions:
Reductions:
Payments
Payments
Payments
Liability transfers (b)
Liability at December 31, 2022
Liability at December 31, 2022
Liability at December 31, 2022
Additions:
Accretion
Accretion
Accretion
Adjustment for change in estimates (a)
Reductions:
Reductions:
Reductions:
Payments
Payments
Payments
Liability at December 31, 2023
Liability at December 31, 2023
Liability at December 31, 2023
Less amounts due currentlyLess amounts due currently(92)(11)(103)
Noncurrent liability at December 31, 2020$1,585 $267 $481 $2,333 
Noncurrent liability at December 31, 2023
____________
(a)Includes non-cash additions to asset retirement costs included in property, plant and equipment of $67 million, $19 million and $19 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
(b)Represents ARO transferred to a third-party for remediation. Any remaining unpaid third-party obligation has been reclassified to other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits in our consolidated balance sheets.
(b)The adjustment for nuclear plant decommissioning resulted from a new cost estimate completed in 2020. Under applicable accounting standards, the liability is remeasured when significant changes in the amount or timing of cash flows occur, and the PUCT requires a new cost estimate at least every five years. The increase in the liability was driven by changes in assumptions including increased costs for labor, equipment and services and a delay in timing of when the U.S. Department of Energy is estimated to begin accepting spent fuel offsite.

170

Table of Contents
Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Deferred Credits

The balance of other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits consists of the following:
December 31,
20202019
Retirement and other employee benefits (Note 17)$312 $295 
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Retirement and other employee benefits (Note 18)
Winter Storm Uri impact (a)
Identifiable intangible liabilities (Note 6)Identifiable intangible liabilities (Note 6)289 286 
Regulatory liability(b)Regulatory liability(b)89 131 
Finance lease liabilitiesFinance lease liabilities206 78 
Uncertain tax positions, including accrued interestUncertain tax positions, including accrued interest12 10 
Liability for third-party remediationLiability for third-party remediation31 41 
Environmental allowances52 
Accrued severance costs
Accrued severance costs
Accrued severance costsAccrued severance costs54 12 
Other accrued expensesOther accrued expenses138 84 
Total other noncurrent liabilities and deferred creditsTotal other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits$1,131 $989 
____________
(a)Includes future bill credits related to large commercial and industrial customers that curtailed during Winter Storm Uri.
155

Table of Contents
(b)As of December 31, 2023, the fair value of the assets contained in the nuclear decommissioning trust was higher than the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning and recorded as a regulatory liability of $209 million in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits. As of December 31, 2022, the carrying value of our ARO related to our nuclear generation plant decommissioning was higher than fair value of the assets contained in the nuclear decommissioning trust and recorded as a regulatory asset of $40 million in other noncurrent assets.

Fair Value of Debt
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Long-term debt (see Note 11):Fair Value HierarchyCarrying AmountFair
Value
Carrying AmountFair
Value
Long-term debt under the Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesLevel 2$2,579 $2,565 $2,715 $2,717 
Vistra Operations Senior NotesLevel 26,634 7,204 6,620 6,926 
Vistra Senior NotesLevel 2774 772 
Forward Capacity AgreementsLevel 345 45 155 155 
Equipment Financing AgreementsLevel 359 59 87 87 
Building FinancingLevel 210 10 16 16 
Other debtLevel 312 12 
December 31, 2023December 31, 2022
Long-term debt (see Note 12):Fair Value HierarchyCarrying AmountFair
Value
Carrying AmountFair
Value
Long-term debt under the Vistra Operations Credit FacilitiesLevel 2$2,456 $2,500 $2,519 $2,486 
Vistra Operations Senior NotesLevel 211,881 11,752 9,378 8,830 
Equipment Financing AgreementsLevel 365 62 74 72 

We determine fair value in accordance with accounting standards as discussed in Note 15.16. We obtain security pricing from an independent party who uses broker quotes and third-party pricing services to determine fair values. Where relevant, these prices are validated through subscription services, such as Bloomberg.

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The following table reconciles cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows to the amounts reported in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 20202023 and 2019:2022:
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents$406 $300 
Restricted cash included in current assetsRestricted cash included in current assets19 147 
Restricted cash included in noncurrent assetsRestricted cash included in noncurrent assets19 28 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashTotal cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$444 $475 

171

Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively.
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash payments related to:
Interest paid$503 $525 $651 
Capitalized interest(21)(12)(12)
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest)$482 $513 $639 
Income taxes paid / (refunds received) (a)$(140)$(76)$67 
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Accrued property, plant and equipment additions (b)$19 $67 $84 
Disposition of investment in NELP$123 $$
Acquisition of investment in NJEA$90 $$
Shares issued for tangible equity unit contracts (Note 14)$$446 $
Land transferred with liability transfers$$16 $
Vistra common stock issued in the Merger (Notes 2 and 14)$$$2,245 
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Cash payments related to:
Interest paid$636 $581 $482 
Capitalized interest(37)(29)(26)
Interest paid (net of capitalized interest)$599 $552 $456 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accrued property, plant and equipment additions (a)$104 $103 $171 
Book value of nuclear fuel sold$26 $— $— 
____________
(a)For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we paid federal income taxes of 0, 0 and $45 million, respectively, paid state income taxes of $40 million, $42 million and $27 million, respectively, received federal tax refunds of $170 million, $115 million and 0, respectively, and received state tax refunds of $10 million, $3 million and $5 million, respectively.
(b)Represents property, plant and equipment accruals during the period for which cash has not been paid as of the end of the period.

For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we paid federal income taxes of zero, $1 million and zero, respectively, paid state income taxes of $44 million, $33 million and $52 million, respectively, and received state tax refunds of $13 million, $8 million and $2 million, respectively.

172156

Table of Contents

Item 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) in effect at December 31, 2020.2023. Based on the evaluation performed, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

VISTRA CORP.
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Vistra Corp. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the company. Vistra Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in condition or the deterioration of compliance with procedures or policies.

The management of Vistra Corp. performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20202023 based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission's (COSO's) Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the review performed, management believes that as of December 31, 20202023 Vistra Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

The independent registered public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of the consolidated financial statements of Vistra Corp. has issued an attestation report on Vistra Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ CURTIS A. MORGAN/s/ JAMES A. BURKE/s/ KRISTOPHER E. MOLDOVAN
Curtis A. MorganJames A. BurkeKristopher E. Moldovan
President and Chief Executive OfficerPresident and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)(Principal Financial Officer)

February 26, 2021


28, 2024

173157

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Vistra Corp.

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Vistra Corp. and its subsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 2020,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020,2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020,2023, of the Company and our report dated February 26, 2021,28, 2024, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company'sCompany’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 26, 202128, 2024

158


Table of Contents
Item 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.(a) On February 25, 2024, Brian Ferraioli notified the Company that he will not seek re-election and will resign as a member of the Board of Directors (Board) of the Company, effective as of the date of the Company's 2024 annual meeting of stockholders (Annual Meeting). Mr. Ferraioli's other business and professional opportunities have increased in demand, and he is resigning from the Board to focus on those other opportunities. Mr. Ferraioli has served as a director of the Company since 2017. Mr. Ferraioli's decision not to seek re-election is not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices.

In addition, on February 26, 2024, Jeff Hunter notified the Company that he will not seek re-election and will resign as a member of the Board, effective as of the Annual Meeting. Mr. Hunter's other business and professional opportunities have increased in demand, and he is resigning from the Board to focus on those other opportunities. Mr. Hunter has served as a director of the Company since 2016. Mr. Hunter's decision not to seek re-election is not the result of any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or practices.

The Board and the Company express sincere appreciation to Messrs. Ferraioli and Hunter for their leadership, strategic contributions, and dedicated service to the Board and the Company.

(b) During the three months ended December 31, 2023, none of our officers or directors adopted or terminated any contract, instruction, or written plan for the purchase or sale of Company securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) or any "non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement".

Item 9C.DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

None.

174159

PART III

Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Code of Ethics

Vistra has adopted a code of ethics entitled "Vistra Code of Conduct" that applies to directors, officers and employees, including the chief executive officer and senior financial officers of Vistra. It may be accessed through the "Corporate Governance" section of the Company's website at www.vistracorp.com. Vistra also elects to disclose the information required by Form 8-K, Item 5.05, "Amendments to the Registrant's Code of Ethics, or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics," through the Company's website and will disclose such events within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, and such information will remain available on this website for at least a 12-month period. A copy of the "Vistra Code of Conduct" is available in print to any stockholder who requests it.

Other information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of Vistra Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the similarly named section of Vistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock of the Company" in Vistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Business Relationships and Related Person Transactions Policy" and "Director Independence" in Vistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.


Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Principal Accounting Fees" in Vistra's Definitive Proxy Statement for its 20212024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Deloitte & Touche LLP's PCAOB ID Number is 34.

175160

PART IV

Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)    Our financial statements and financial statement schedules are incorporated under Part II, Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

(b)    SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT

VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Depreciation and amortization$(15)$(7)$
Selling, general and administrative expenses(72)(62)(266)
Operating loss(87)(69)(266)
Other income12 
Interest expense and related charges(7)(88)(257)
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(37)(79)
Loss before income tax benefit(84)(182)(593)
Income tax benefit25 42 282 
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax695 1,068 257 
Net income (loss)$636 $928 $(54)
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Depreciation and amortization$(15)$(16)$(17)
Selling, general and administrative expenses(80)(69)(53)
Operating loss(95)(85)(70)
Other income31 
Impacts of Tax Receivable Agreement(164)(128)53 
Loss before income tax benefit(228)(207)(14)
Income tax benefit58 47 
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries, net of tax1,663 (1,067)(1,264)
Net income (loss)$1,493 $(1,227)$(1,274)

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.

VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows — operating activities:
Cash used in operating activities$(86)$(58)$(125)
Cash flows — investing activities:
Capital expenditures(15)(36)(24)
Dividend received from subsidiaries1,105 3,890 4,668 
Other, net(1)
Cash provided by investing activities1,090 3,854 4,643 
Cash flows — financing activities:
Repayments/repurchases of debt(747)(2,903)(4,543)
Debt tender offer and other debt financing fees(17)(123)(179)
Stock repurchases(656)(763)
Dividends paid to stockholders(266)(243)
Other, net12 
Cash used in financing activities(1,030)(3,925)(5,473)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(26)(129)(955)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance99 228 1,183 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$73 $99 $228 
Year Ended December 31,
202320222021
Cash flows — operating activities:
Cash used in operating activities$(31)$(27)$(38)
Cash flows — investing activities:
Capital expenditures— — — 
Dividend received from subsidiaries1,625 1,775 405 
Equity contribution to subsidiaries— — (988)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities1,625 1,775 (583)
Cash flows — financing activities:
Issuances of preferred stock— — 2,000 
Stock repurchases(1,245)(1,949)(471)
Dividends paid to common stockholders(313)(302)(290)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders(150)(151)— 
Other, net91 40 (23)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,617)(2,362)1,216 
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(23)(614)595 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning balance54 668 73 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — ending balance$31 $54 $668 

176

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.

161

VISTRA CORP. (PARENT)
SCHEDULE I - CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars)
December 31,
20202019
December 31,December 31,
202320232022
ASSETSASSETS
Cash and cash equivalentsCash and cash equivalents$73 $56 
Restricted cash43 
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade accounts receivable — netTrade accounts receivable — net
Trade accounts receivable — net
Trade accounts receivable — net
Income taxes receivable
Prepaid expense and other current assetsPrepaid expense and other current assets100 
Total current assetsTotal current assets85 204 
Investment in affiliated companiesInvestment in affiliated companies8,005 8,364 
Property, plant and equipment — netProperty, plant and equipment — net
Identifiable intangible assets — netIdentifiable intangible assets — net47 49 
Accumulated deferred income taxesAccumulated deferred income taxes783 729 
Other noncurrent assets67 
Total assets
Total assets
Total assetsTotal assets$8,925 $9,417 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Long-term debt due currently$$87 
Trade accounts payable
Trade accounts payable
Trade accounts payableTrade accounts payable
Accounts payable —affiliatesAccounts payable —affiliates74 145 
Accrued taxesAccrued taxes14 
Accrued interest11 
Other current liabilities
Other current liabilities
Other current liabilitiesOther current liabilities46 
Total current liabilitiesTotal current liabilities94 291 
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently689 
Tax Receivable Agreement obligationsTax Receivable Agreement obligations447 455 
Tax Receivable Agreement obligations
Tax Receivable Agreement obligations
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred debits
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred debits
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred debitsOther noncurrent liabilities and deferred debits23 22 
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities564 1,457 
Total stockholders' equityTotal stockholders' equity8,361 7,960 
Total liabilities and equityTotal liabilities and equity$8,925 $9,417 

See Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unconsolidated condensed balance sheets, statements of net loss and cash flows present results of operations and cash flows of Vistra Corp. (Parent). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules of the SEC. Because the unconsolidated condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes of Vistra Corp. and Subsidiaries included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.2023. Vistra Corp.'s subsidiaries have been accounted for under the equity method. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Vistra Corp. (Parent) files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consolidated tax expenses or benefits and deferred tax assets or liabilities have been allocated to the respective subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting rules that apply to separate financial statements of subsidiaries.

177162

Table of Contents
2.RESTRICTIONS ON SUBSIDIARIES

The Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement generally restricts the ability of Vistra Operations to make distributions to any direct or indirect parent unless such distributions are expressly permitted thereunder. As of December 31, 2020,2023, Vistra Operations can distribute approximately $6.7$6.3 billion to Vistra Corp. (Parent) under the Vistra Operations Credit Facilities Agreement without the consent of any party. The amount that can be distributed by Vistra Operations to Parent was partially reduced by distributions made by Vistra Operations to Vistra Corp. (Parent) of approximately $1.1$1.625 billion, $3.9$1.775 billion and $4.7 billion$405 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively. Additionally, Vistra Operations may make distributions to Vistra Corp. (Parent) in amounts sufficient for Vistra Corp. (Parent) to make any payments required under the TRA or the Tax Matters Agreement or, to the extent arising out of Vistra Corp. (Parent)'s ownership or operation of Vistra Operations, to pay any taxes or general operating or corporate overhead expenses. As of December 31, 2020,2023, all of the maximum amount of restricted net assets of Vistra Operations that may not be distributed to Vistra Corp. (Parent) totaled approximately $1.2 billion..

3.GUARANTEES

Vistra Corp. (Parent) has entered into contracts that contain guarantees to unaffiliated parties that could require performance or payment under certain conditions. As of December 31, 2020,2023, there are no material outstanding claims related to guarantee obligations of Vistra Corp. (Parent), and Vistra Corp. (Parent) does not anticipate it will be required to make any material payments under these guarantees in the near term.

4.DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS

Under applicable law, Vistra Corp. (Parent) is prohibited from paying any dividend to the extent that immediately following payment of such dividend there would be no statutory surplus or Vistra Corp. (Parent) would be insolvent.

Vistra Corp. (Parent) received $1.105$1.625 billion, $3.890$1.775 billion and $4.668 billion$405 million in dividends from its consolidated subsidiaries in the years ended December 31, 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018,2021, respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2021, Vistra Corp. (Parent) made an equity contribution to Vistra Operations of $988 million.

(c)    EXHIBITS:

Vistra Corp. Exhibits to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20202023
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
(2)Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
2.1
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
2.1
2.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
2.1
2.3
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed March 7, 2023)
2.1
(3(i))Articles of Incorporation
3.1
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2020)
3.1
3.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 29, 2020)
3.1
3.3001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 15, 2021)
3.1
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
(2)Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
2.1
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
2.1
2.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed October 31, 2017)
2.1
(3(i))Articles of Incorporation
3.1
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2020)
3.1
3.2
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 29, 2020)
3.1
(3(ii))By-laws
3.3**
163

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
3.4001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on December 13, 2021)
3.1
3.5001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on January 4, 2024)
3.1
(3(ii))By-laws
3.5001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
3.5
(4)Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.1
4.2001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.2
4.3001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.3
4.4001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.5
4.5001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2019) (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.36
4.6001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.5
4.7001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.6
4.8001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.8
4.9001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.9
4.10001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.3
4.11001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
4.11
164

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.12001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.12
4.13001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.1
4.14001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.1
4.15001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.2

4.16001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.3

4.17001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.6
4.18001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2019) (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.41
4.19001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.7
4.20001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.8
4.21001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.17
4.22001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.18
4.23001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.4
4.24001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
4.22
4.25001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.24
165

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.26001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.2
4.27001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.1
4.28001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.2
4.29001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.3
4.30001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.7
4.31001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2019) (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.46
4.32001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.9
4.33001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.10
4.34001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.26
4.35001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.27
4.36001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.5
4.37001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
4.33
4.38001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.36
4.39001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.3
166

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.40001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.1
4.41001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.2
4.42001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.3
4.43001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.4
4.44001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.5
4.45001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.6
4.46001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.8
4.47001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.1
4.48001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.2
4.49001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.3
4.50001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.4
4.51001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.11
4.52001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.12
4.53001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.41
167

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.54001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.42
4.55001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.6
4.56001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
4.50
4.57001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 16, 2022)
4.1
4.58001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 16, 2022)
4.2
4.59001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 16, 2022)
4.3
4.60001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 16, 2022)
4.4
4.61001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 16, 2022)
4.5
4.62001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.55
4.63001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.4
4.64001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.1
4.65001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.2
4.66001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.3
168

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.67001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.4
4.68001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.5
4.69001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 2, 2023)
4.6
4.70001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 11, 2021)
4.1
4.71001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 11, 2021)
4.2
4.72001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 11, 2021)
4.3
4.73001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.7
4.74001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
4.55
4.75001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.65
4.76001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.5
4.77001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.7
4.78001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.8
4.79001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)
4.1
4.80001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)
4.12
169

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.81001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)
4.1
4.82001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
4.1
4.83001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
4.1
4.84001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)
4.2
4.85001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)
4.13
4.86001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)
4.2
4.87001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
4.76
4.88001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 16, 2020)
4.1
4.89001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
4.2
4.90001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
4.2
170

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.91001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
4.56
4.92001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2021) (filed on May 4, 2021)
4.6
4.93001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 15, 2021)
4.1
4.94001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
4.2
4.95001-38086
Form of 8-K
(filed on July 15, 2022)
4.1
4.96001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on July 17, 2023)
4.1
4.97001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on June 22, 2023)
4.1
4.98001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on June 22, 2023)
4.2
4.99001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on June 22, 2023)
4.3
4.100001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on June 22, 2023)
4.4
4.101001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on June 22, 2023)
4.5
171

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.102001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
4.6
4.103
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
4.1
4.104**
(10)Material Contracts
Management Contracts; Compensatory Plans, Contracts and Arrangements
10.1
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.6
10.2
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.7
10.3
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.8
10.4001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2017) (filed on February 26, 2018)
10(d)
10.5001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
10.5
10.6001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
10.6
10.7001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
10.7
10.8001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
10.8
10.9
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.9
10.10001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 23, 2019)
10.1
10.11001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2018) (filed on February 28, 2019)
10.7
172

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.12001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2020) (filed
on February 26, 2021)
10.13
10.13
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2018)
10.1

10.14
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed March 21, 2022)
10.1
10.15**
10.16**
10.17**
10.18**
10.19**
10.20**
10.21**
10.22001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
10.22
Credit Agreements and Related Agreements
10.23
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.1
10.24
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.2
10.25
333-215288
Amendment No. 1
to Form S-1
(filed February 14, 2017)
10.3
10.26
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.4
173

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.27
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed August 17, 2017)
10.1
10.28
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed December 14, 2017)
10.1
10.29
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 22, 2018)
10.1
10.30
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 15, 2018)
10.1
10.31
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed April 4, 2019)
10.4
10.32
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 29, 2019)
10.1
10.33001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
10.1
10.34001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on May 5, 2022)
10.1
174

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.35001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2022) (filed on November 4, 2022)
10.3
10.36001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2023) (filed on August 9, 2023)
10.1
10.37001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
10.1
10.38001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on December 26, 2023)
10.1
10.39
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.10
10.40
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.11
10.41
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.12
10.42
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.13
10.43001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
10.63
10.44001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2022) (filed on August 5, 2022)
10.3
175

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.45001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2022) (filed on August 5, 2022)
10.4
10.46001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2022) (filed on August 5, 2022)
10.5
10.47001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
10.72
10.48001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2022) (filed
on March 1, 2023)
10.73
10.49001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
10.2
10.50001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2023) (filed on November 7, 2023)
10.3
Other Material Contracts
10.51
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.5
10.52001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
10.2
10.53001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
10.3
10.54001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on January 4, 2024)
10.1
176

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.55
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.14
10.56
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.15
10.57
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.16
10.58
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.17
10.59
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.18
10.60
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed July 7, 2017)
10(a)
10.61
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed March 7, 2023)
10.1
10.62
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed March 7, 2023)
10.2
10.63001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
10.1
10.64001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 15, 2021)
10.1
10.65001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
10.2
10.66001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 15, 2022)
10.1
10.67001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 17, 2023)
10.1
177

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.68001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
10.2
10.69001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2021) (filed on November 5, 2021)
10.3
10.70001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
10.1
10.71001-38086
Form 10-K (Year ended December 31, 2021) (filed
on February 25, 2022)
10.62
10.72001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 17, 2023)
10.2
(21)Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21.1**
(23)Consent of Experts
23.1**
(31)Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications
31.1**
31.2**
(32)Section 1350 Certifications
32.1***
32.2***
(95)Mine Safety Disclosures
95.1**
(97)Policy Relating to Recover of Erroneously Awarded Compensation
97.1**
XBRL Data Files
101.INS**The following financial information from Vistra Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2023 formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
178

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
(4)Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.1
4.2001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.2
4.3001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.3
4.4001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.5
4.5001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.36
4.6001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.5
4.7001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.6
4.8**
4.9**
4.10001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.1

4.11001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.2

4.12001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on February 6, 2019)
4.3

4.13001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.6
4.14001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.41
179

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.15001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.7
4.16001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.8
4.17**
4.18**
4.19001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.1
4.20001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.2
4.21001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 24, 2019)
4.3
4.22001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.7
4.23001-38086
Form 10-K (filed
on February 28, 2020)
4.46
4.24001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.9
4.25001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.10
4.26**
4.27**
4.28001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.1
4.29001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.2
180

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.30001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.3
4.31001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.4
4.32001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.5
4.33001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 17, 2019)
4.6
4.34001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2019) (filed on November 5, 2019)
4.8
4.35001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.1
4.36001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.2
4.37001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.3
4.38001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
4.4
4.39001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.11
4.40001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2020) (filed on May 5, 2020)
4.12
4.41**
4.42**
4.43001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.7
181

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.44001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 23, 2018)
4.8
4.45001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)
4.1
4.46001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)
4.12
4.47001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)
4.1
4.48001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
4.1
4.49001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
4.1
4.50001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 5, 2019)
4.2
4.51001-38086
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2019) (filed on August 2, 2019)
4.13
4.52001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 19, 2019)
4.2
4.53001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on July 16, 2020)
4.1
182

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
4.54001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
4.2
4.55001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
4.2
4.56**
4.57001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)
4.1
4.58001-38086
Registration Statement on Form 8-A
(filed on April 9, 2018)
4.2
4.59001-33443
Form of 8-K
(filed on February 7, 2017)
4.1
4.60
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
4.1
4.61**
(10)Material Contracts
Management Contracts; Compensatory Plans, Contracts and Arrangements
10.1
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.6
10.2
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.7
10.3
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.8
10.4001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2017) (filed on February 26, 2018)
10(d)
10.5**
183

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.6**
10.7**
10.8**
10.9
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.9
10.10001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2018) (filed on February 28, 2019)
10.6
10.11001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on May 23, 2019)
10.1
10.12001-33443
Form10-K (Year ended December 31, 2018) (filed on February 28, 2019)
10.7
10.13**
10.14
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 4, 2018)
10.1

10.15001-33443
Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2019) (filed on May 3, 2019)
10.5
10.16
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.22
10.17
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.23
10.18
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 27, 2020)
10.2
10.19
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 27, 2020)
10.1
10.20
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.26
184

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.21
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.29
Credit Agreements and Related Agreements
10.22
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.1
10.23
333-215288
Form S-1
(filed December 23, 2016)
10.2
10.24
333-215288
Amendment No. 1
to Form S-1
(filed February 14, 2017)
10.3
10.25
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.4
10.26
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed August 17, 2017)
10.1
10.27
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed December 14, 2017)
10.1
10.28
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed February 22, 2018)
10.1
10.29
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed June 15, 2018)
10.1
10.30
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed April 4, 2019)
10.4
185

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.31
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed May 29, 2019)
10.1
10.32001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 21, 2019)
10.1
10.33001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on August 7, 2018)
10.1
10.34001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on January 24, 2019)
10.1
10.35001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 7, 2019)
10.1
10.36001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 7, 2019)
10.2
10.37001-38086
Form 8-K (filed
on November 13, 2019)
10.1
10.38
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.10
10.39
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.11
10.40
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.12
10.41
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on April 9, 2018)
10.13
186

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
Other Material Contracts
10.42
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.5
10.43001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
10.2
10.44001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on June 15, 2018)
10.3
10.45
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.13
10.46
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.14
10.47
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.15
10.48
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.16
10.49
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.17
10.50
333-215288
Amendment No. 2
to Form S-1
(filed April 5, 2017)
10.18
10.51
001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed July 7, 2017)
10(a)
10.52001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
10.1
187

Table of Contents
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
10.53001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on October 16, 2020)
10.2
10.54001-38086
Form 8-K
(filed on December 28, 2020)
10.1
(21)Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21.1**
(23)Consent of Experts
23.1**
(31)Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certifications
31.1**
31.2**
(32)Section 1350 Certifications
32.1***
32.2***
(95)Mine Safety Disclosures
95.1**
XBRL Data Files
101.INS**The following financial information from Vistra Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (v) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104The Cover Page Interactive Data File does not appear in Exhibit 104 because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
ExhibitsPreviously Filed With File Number*As
Exhibit
101.SCH**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104The Cover Page Interactive Data File does not appear in Exhibit 104 because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
____________________
*    Incorporated herein by reference
**    Filed herewith
***    Furnished herewith

188

Table of Contents

Item 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

189179

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Vistra Corp. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

VISTRA CORP.
Date:February 26, 202128, 2024By/s/ CURTISJAMES A. MORGANBURKE
CurtisJames A. Morgan (ChiefBurke (President and Chief Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Vistra Corp. and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ CURTISJAMES A. MORGANBURKEPrincipal Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 26, 2021
(Curtis A. Morgan, Chief Executive Officer)
/s/ JAMES A. BURKEPrincipal Financial OfficerFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(James A. Burke, President and Chief FinancialExecutive Officer)
/s/ CHRISTY DOBRYKRISTOPHER E. MOLDOVANPrincipal Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2024
(Kristopher E. Moldovan, Chief Financial Officer)
/s/ MARGARET MONTEMAYORPrincipal Accounting OfficerFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Christy Dobry,Margaret Montemayor, Senior Vice President, Chief Accountant and Controller)
/s/ SCOTT B. HELMChairman of the Board and DirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Scott B. Helm, Chairman of the Board)
/s/ HILARY E. ACKERMANNDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Hilary E. Ackermann)
/s/ ARCILIA C. ACOSTADirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Arcilia C. Acosta)
/s/ GAVIN R. BAIERADirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Gavin R. Baiera)
/s/ PAUL M. BARBASDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Paul M. Barbas)
/s/ LISA M. CRUTCHFIELDDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Lisa M. Crutchfield)
/s/ BRIAN K. FERRAIOLIDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Brian K. Ferraioli)
/s/ JEFF D. HUNTERDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(Jeff D. Hunter)
/s/ JULIE A. LAGACYDirectorFebruary 28, 2024
(Julie A. Lagacy)
/s/ JOHN R. SULTDirectorFebruary 26, 202128, 2024
(John R. Sult)

190180