•Scalable digital platform. Because each feature of our platform is digitally-enabled, we can efficiently adapt to the changing preferences of our constituents and achieve greater scale.
Enterprise Risk Management
GreenSky operates in a highly regulated industry. In addition, our relationships with our merchants and third-party vendors subject us to a variety of regulatory, financial and reputational risks. The Company developed and implemented a comprehensive compliance management system designed to maintain compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the GreenSky program and to adapt to our evolving business strategy and operations. In addition, we have developed a proprietary complaints management system designed to identify, document and remediate customer complaints promptly and efficiently. Key components of our risk management efforts include the following:
•Merchant Management. Prior to enrollment for participation in the GreenSky program, prospective merchants undergo a rigorous vetting and underwriting process. Thereafter, merchants are subject to continued review through our merchant risk management, compliance management and complaints management programs, and, depending on the results of that review, may be subject to suspension or termination from the GreenSky program. In addition, merchants are required to complete initial compliance and fair lending training and are provided ongoing training materials. Each of these programs is designed to prevent, detect and mitigate financial and reputational risks brought to the GreenSky program by merchants.
•Customer Satisfaction. We deploy multiple communication channels to raise borrower awareness of account activity related to their GreenSky program loan, including welcome emails, account alerts and outbound calls.In addition, we routinely make outbound customer satisfaction calls and send emails to sample populations of borrowers as part of our ongoing merchant reevaluation and review process. This process includes dedicated outbound call campaigns designed to sample borrowers across the program merchant network, with particular focus on certain higher risk groups, such as elderly borrowers. We have a
2018 Developmentsteam of GreenSky Customer Advocates who work to resolve borrower dissatisfaction with merchants or the GreenSky program.
Specific key developments•Bank Partners. We engage with bank partners that seek attractive risk-adjusted yields and results from 2018 include:portfolio diversification through exposure to high quality consumer credit. For the GreenSky program, each of our Bank Partners has directed a proprietary credit policy, which is grounded in proven, established credit performance attributes and is designed to incorporate the credit performance of a full economic cycle. Our proprietary technology platform instantly adjudicates on each application using transparent and verifiable credit criteria and allocates each loan based on the credit guidelines of our Bank Partners.
| |
– | We added two new Bank Partners. Combined with increases in funding commitments by existing Bank Partners, our aggregate commitments as of December 31, 2018 were $11.8 billion, an increase of $3.8 billion since December 31, 2017; |
| |
– | We maintained an attractive consumer profile. For all loans originated on our platform during 2018, the credit-line weighted average consumer credit score was 768. Furthermore, consumers with credit scores over 780 comprised 33% of the Loan Servicing Portfolio as of December 31, 2018 and over 85% of the Loan Servicing Portfolio as of December 31, 2018 consisted of consumers with credit scores over 700; |
| |
– | We achieved significant growth over 2017 in each of our key business metrics of active merchants (37%), transaction volume (34%), loan servicing portfolio (36%) and cumulative consumer accounts (43%);
|
| |
– | We entered into a multi-faceted collaboration with American Express consisting of: (i) a strategic alliance whereby American Express will enable eligible United States merchants that accept American Express and the customers they serve to access the Company’s proprietary point-of-sale financing solutions, (ii) a pilot program (initially within the home improvement category) for direct to consumer loans for eligible American Express consumer Card Members to search for participating merchants within GreenSky's network, and to finance their purchases at participating American Express accepting merchants of their choosing within or outside of GreenSky's merchant network, and (iii) access to American Express vPayment, a virtual payments solution, in order to facilitate purchases via virtual account numbers delivered to approved customers; and |
| |
– | Our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150 million of the Company's Class A common stock. Subsequently, we repurchased 4.7 million shares of Class A common stock at a cost of $43.9 million during 2018. |
Intellectual Property, Patents and Trademarks
We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and agreements with employees and third parties to protect our proprietary rights. We also rely on contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights when offering or procuring products and services. We routinely enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and contractors and other parties with whom we conduct business to control use and access to, and limit disclosure of, our proprietary information. In 2014, we submitted a patent application relating to our mobile application process and credit decisioning model; the related patent was issued in July 2020. In 2020, we submitted additional patent applications related to our mobile application process and credit decisioning model; we received a patent related to one of these applications in November 2020. We also submitted a patent application related to our Universal Credit Application platform, which allows participating merchants to seamlessly make available second-look financing to their customers. We have trademark and service mark registrations and pending applications for additional registrations in the United States. We also own the domain name rights for "greensky.com," as well as other words and phrases important to our business.
For additional information regarding some of the risks relating to our intellectual property, see Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors."
Competition
The consumer credit and payments market is highly fragmented, rapidly evolving, subject to regulatory scrutiny and oversight and highly competitive. We face competition from a diverse landscape of consumer lenders, including traditional banks, credit unions and credit card issuers, as well as alternative technology-enabled lenders. Many of our credit and payment competitors are (or are affiliated with) financial institutions with the capacity to hold loans on their balance sheets, increasing the potential profitability of individual consumer relationships. Some of these competitors offer a broader suite of products and services than we do, including retail banking solutions, credit and debit cards and loyalty programs.
We compete for merchants based on a number of key product features, including price, duration, simplicity of loan terms, promotional terms, a borrower's ease ofin applying, merchant fees, user experience and time-to-funding. Our existing core unsecured term loan products face competition primarily from home equity lines of credit and general purposegeneral-purpose revolving credit cards. Consumers can access these alternatives through a range of traditional and technology-enabled sources. In the future, we may confront increasedWe expect competition from existing competitors,to continue to increase as many traditional, large-scale consumer lenders are investing in technology to streamline loan application and funding processes. We also expect to face additional competition from current competitors or others who embrace new technologies to significantly change the consumer credit and payment industry. Additionally, traditional banks have acquired technology-enabled platforms to scale their consumer loan origination platforms.
Seasonality
Our business is generally subject to seasonality in consumer spending and payment patterns. While the patterns we have historically observed have been somewhat disrupted by COVID-19, we expect seasonality to continue. Given that our home improvement vertical is the most significant contributor to our overall revenue, our revenue generally is higher during the second and third quarters of the year as the weather improves, the residential real estate market becomes more active and consumers begin home improvement projects. During these periods, we tend to experience increased loan applications and, in turn, transaction volume. Conversely, our revenue generally slows during the first and fourth quarters of the year, as consumer spending on home improvement projects tends to slow leading up to the holiday season and through the winter months. As a result, the volume of loan applications and
transactions also tends to slow during these periods. The elective healthcare vertical is susceptible to seasonality during the fourth quarter of the year, as licensed healthcare providers take more vacation time around the holiday season. During this period, the volume of elective healthcare procedures and our resulting revenue tend to slow relative to other periods throughout the year. Our seasonality trends may vary in the future as we introduce our program to new industry verticals and become less concentrated in the home improvement industry.
The origination related and finance charge reversal components of our cost of revenue (further discussed in Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8) also are subject to these same seasonal factors, while the servicing related component of cost of revenue, in particular customer service staffing, printing and postage costs, is not as closely correlated to seasonal volume patterns. As transaction volume increases, the transaction volume related personnel costs, as well as costs related to credit and identity verification, among other activities, increase as well. Further, finance charge reversal settlements are positively correlated with transaction volume in the same period of the prior year. As prepayments on deferred interest loans, which trigger finance charge reversals, typically are highest towards the end of the promotional period, and promotional periods are most commonly 12, 18 or 24 months, finance charge reversal settlements typically follow a similar seasonal pattern as transaction volumes over the course of a calendar year.
Lastly, we have observed seasonal patterns in consumer credit, driven to an extent by income tax refunds, which result in lower charge-offs during the second and third quarters of the year. Credit improvement during these periods has a positive impact on the incentive payments we receive from our Bank Partners. Conversely, during the first and fourth quarters of the year, when credit performance is comparably lower, our incentive payment receipts are negatively impacted, which in turn has a negative impact on our cost of revenue.
Significant Customers
Our top ten merchants (including certain groups of affiliated merchants) accounted for an aggregate of 27%29% of our total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The Home Depot is our most significant single merchant, and represented approximately 5% of total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition,followed by affiliates of Renewal by Andersen, our largest Sponsor, represented together approximately 19% of total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018.which affiliates include Andersen Corporation-owned licensed dealers and independently-owned and operated Renewal by Andersen licensed dealers. We expect to have significant concentration in our largest merchant relationships for the foreseeable future. In the event that (i) The Home Depot or one or more of our other significant merchants, or groups of merchants, or (ii) Renewal by Andersen or one or more of our other significant Sponsors, and their dealers, terminate their relationships with us, or elect to utilize an alternative source for financing, the number of loans originated through the GreenSky program likely would decline, which would materially adversely affect our business and, in turn, our revenue.
EmployeesHuman Capital
As of December 31, 2018,2021, GreenSky had 1,088992 full-time employees, with substantially all employees located in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia, Mooresville, North Carolina or remotely across the country. Our sales force is mainly remote across the country. We also engage temporary employees and Crescent Hills, Kentucky.consultants as needed to support our operations. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe we have positiveconsider our relationships with our employees to be good.
We believe that the success and future growth of our Company depends greatly on our ability to attract, develop and retain top talent while integrating diversity, equity and inclusion principles and practices into our core values. We strive to ensure that GreenSky is a diverse, inclusive and safe environment that fosters creativity and innovation. To succeed in a competitive labor market, we seek to provide our employees with opportunities to grow and develop in their careers, supported by strong compensation, benefits and health and wellness programs.
Health and Safety. The health and safety of our employees and their families is our highest priority and is reflected, most recently, in our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in response to which we successfully instituted a company‑wide work‑from‑home program in March 2020 to ensure the safety of all of our employees and their families and implemented an emergency paid-time-off policy that employees can use to help cover time out of work in order to care for themselves or their immediate family members. Our Business Continuity Planning (BCP) Team communicates regularly with employees, provides resources for health, wellness and engagement, and establishes safety protocols for employees continuing critical on-site work.
Diversity and Inclusion. The Company believes that an inclusive and diverse work environment serves the interests of all of our stakeholders, encourages employee acceptance, development and retention, and helps us to exceed customer expectations and meet our growth objectives.We are committed to building a culture that fosters diversity, values inclusion and promotes individuality.Current key initiatives include employee experience, learning and development, talent acquisition, and external relationships.
Compensation and Benefits. We have demonstrated a history of investing in our workforce by offering a comprehensive compensation and benefits program to our employees. Salaries and wages paid to our employees are competitive based on position, skill and experience level, knowledge, and geographic location. In addition, we maintain an annual bonus plan, an equity award plan and a 401(k) plan for eligible employees. We also provide, among other benefits, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, a healthcare advocacy service, employer paid disability leave, employer paid life insurance, paid time off, paid parental leave, employer paid telehealth, employee assistance programs and tuition assistance.
Training and Talent Development. Our ability to grow and succeed in a highly competitive industry depends on the continued engagement, training and development of our employees. The Company’s talent development programs are designed to provide employees with the resources to help them achieve their career goals, build management skills and lead their organizations.We have a strong value proposition that leverages our unique culture, collaborative working environment and shared sense of purpose to attract talent.We provide a wide variety of opportunities for professional growth for all employees with classroom and online training and on‑the‑job experience and counseling.
Available Information
Our internet addresswebsite is www.greensky.com. We make available on the Investor Relations section of our website, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and Forms 3, 4 and 5, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such documents with, or furnishing such documents to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").
On the Investor Relations section of our website, we webcast any earnings calls and certain events that we participate in or host with members of the investment community. Additionally, we provide notifications of news or announcements regarding our financial performance, including SEC filings, investor events, press and earnings releases. Further corporate governance information, including our board committee charters, code of business conduct and ethics and corporate governance guidelines, is also available on our Investor Relations website under the heading "Corporate Governance."
Our internet addresswebsite is included herein as an inactive textual reference only. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference herein and should not be considered part of this report. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and proxy statements, and amendments to those reports that we file with, or furnish to, the SEC are available free
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business involves significant risks, some of which are described below. You should carefully review and consider the following risk factors and the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in these risk factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation, revenue, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects, in which event the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment. In addition, our business, reputation, revenue, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects also could be harmed by risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material.
Risk Factors Summary
We are providing the following summary of the risk factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to enhance the readability and accessibility of our risk factor disclosures. We encourage you to carefully review the full risk factors contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in their entirety for additional information regarding the material factors that make an investment in our securities speculative or risky. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:
•our proposed merger with Goldman Sachs may not be completed on a timely basis, on anticipated terms, or at all, and there are uncertainties and risks to consummating the merger;
•current and uncertain future impact from COVID-19 on our business;
•the non-exclusive, short term nature of our agreements with our Bank Partners;
•our ability to retain existing, and attract new, merchants, Bank Partners and other funding sources;
•the concentration of our revenue in our top ten merchants;
•the effective promotion and support of the GreenSky program by our Sponsors and merchants;
•our potential liability for remediation costs if our merchants fail to fulfill their obligations to consumers;
•the results of any federal and state regulatory inquiries regarding our business;
•changes in market interest rates;
•loan delinquencies and default rates;
•the performance of the participations we own in certain loans originated by Bank Partners through the GreenSky program;
•the rate at which deferred interest loans are repaid prior to the end of the promotional period;
•the accuracy of information about customers of our merchants and credit decisioning, pricing, loss forecasting and credit decisioning models;
•fluctuations in the U.S. home improvement industry, given our concentration in that market;
•our ability to operate successfully in the elective healthcare vertical and to comply with additional regulation of this market;
•our ability to comply with the evolving regulation of the consumer finance industry;
•cyber attacks, security breaches or other disruptions in the operation of our computer systems and third-party data centers; and
•the control of us by the owners of Class B common stock.
Risks Related to Our Proposed Merger
On September 14, 2021, GreenSky, Inc. and GS Holdings entered into the Merger Agreement with Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs Bank. The Merger Agreement provides that the Company will become an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs. For more information regarding the Mergers, GreenSky stockholders are encouraged to read the proxy statement / prospectus filed on Schedule 14A by GreenSky, Inc on November 9, 2021 (the "Proxy Statement / Prospectus").
Because the exchange ratio pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fixed and the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock has fluctuated and will continue to fluctuate, GreenSky stockholders cannot be sure of the value of the consideration they will receive upon completion of the Mergers or the value of the GreenSky Common Stock they will give up.
Upon completion of the Mergers, (i) each share of Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the Mergers (the “Class A Common Stock”) (except for shares of Class A Common Stock held by GreenSky as treasury stock or by Goldman Sachs, Goldman Sachs Bank, Merger Sub 1 or Merger Sub 2, which will be cancelled without consideration) will automatically be converted into the right to receive 0.03 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Goldman Sachs (the “Merger Consideration”); (ii) each share of Class B common stock, $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Class B Common Stock” and, together with the Class A Common Stock, the “GreenSky Common Stock”) will be automatically deemed transferred to the Company and cancelled for no consideration; and (iii) each Holdco Unit will be converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration (other than Holdco Units that are owned by the Company, which will be converted into an equal number of limited liability company interests in Merger Sub 2). Because the exchange ratio is fixed, the value of the Merger Consideration will depend on the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock at the time the Mergers are completed.
The value of the Merger Consideration has fluctuated since the date of the announcement of the Merger Agreement and will continue to fluctuate from the date of this filing to the date on which the Mergers are completed and thereafter. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including, among others, general market and economic conditions, changes in Goldman Sachs’s and GreenSky’s respective businesses, operations and prospects, market assessments of the likelihood that the Mergers will be completed, the timing of the Mergers and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are beyond Goldman Sachs’s and GreenSky’s control.
The market price of Goldman Sachs common stock after the Mergers may be affected by factors different from those affecting the market price of GreenSky Class A Common Stock.
Upon completion of the Mergers, holders of shares of GreenSky Common Stock will become holders of shares of Goldman Sachs common stock. The business of Goldman Sachs differs from that of GreenSky in important respects; accordingly, the results of operations of Goldman Sachs after the Mergers, as well as the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock, may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the results of operations of GreenSky. For further information on the business of Goldman Sachs, see the documents incorporated by reference into the Proxy Statement / Prospectus and referred to in the “Where You Can Find More Information” section of the same document as well as the Goldman Sachs Form 10-K filed on February 24, 2022. Additionally, the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock may fluctuate significantly following completion of the Mergers, and holders of GreenSky Common Stock could lose the value of their investment in Goldman Sachs common stock. The issuance of shares of Goldman Sachs common stock in the Mergers could on its own have a negative impact on the market price for Goldman Sachs common stock. In addition, many GreenSky stockholders may decide not to hold the shares of Goldman Sachs common stock they receive as a result of the Mergers. Other GreenSky stockholders, such as funds with limitations on their permitted holdings of stock in individual issuers, may be required to sell the shares of Goldman Sachs common stock they receive as a result of the Mergers. Any such sales of Goldman Sachs common stock could have a negative impact on the market price for Goldman Sachs common stock. Moreover, general fluctuations in stock markets could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity of, the Goldman Sachs common stock, regardless of Goldman Sachs’s actual operating performance.
After completion of the Mergers, Goldman Sachs may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers, which could adversely affect the value of Goldman Sachs common stock.
The success of the Mergers will depend, in significant part, on Goldman Sachs’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits from combining the businesses of Goldman Sachs and GreenSky. The ability of Goldman Sachs to realize these anticipated benefits is subject to certain risks, including, among others:
•Goldman Sachs’s ability to successfully combine the businesses of Goldman Sachs and GreenSky;
•whether the combined business will perform as expected;
•the possibility that Goldman Sachs paid more for GreenSky than the value Goldman Sachs will derive from the acquisition; and
•the assumption of known and unknown liabilities of GreenSky.
If Goldman Sachs is not able to successfully combine the businesses of Goldman Sachs and GreenSky within the anticipated time frame, or at all, the anticipated cost savings and other benefits of the Mergers may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected, the combined business may not perform as expected and the value of the Goldman Sachs common stock (including the Merger Consideration) may be adversely affected.
Goldman Sachs and GreenSky have operated and, until completion of the Mergers, will continue to operate, independently, and there is no assurance that their businesses can be integrated successfully. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key Goldman Sachs or GreenSky employees, the loss of merchants and/or customers, the disruption of either company’s or both companies’ ongoing businesses or in unexpected integration issues, higher than expected integration costs and an overall integration process after the Mergers that takes longer than originally anticipated. Specifically, the following issues, among others, must be addressed in integrating the operations of Goldman Sachs and GreenSky in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers so the combined business performs as expected:
•combining certain of the companies’ operations, financial, reporting and corporate functions;
•integrating the companies’ technologies;
•integrating and unifying product offerings and services;
•identifying and eliminating redundant and underperforming functions and assets;
•harmonizing the companies’ operating practices, employee development and compensation programs, internal controls and other policies, procedures and processes;
•maintaining existing agreements with commercial counterparties and avoiding delays in entering into new agreements with prospective commercial counterparties;
•addressing possible differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies;
•consolidating the companies’ administrative and information technology infrastructure;
•coordinating sales, distribution and marketing efforts; and
•coordinating geographically dispersed organizations.
In addition, at times, the attention of certain members of either company’s or both companies’ management and resources may be focused on completion of the Mergers and the integration of the businesses of the two companies and diverted from day-to-day business operations, which may disrupt each company’s ongoing business and the business of the combined company.
GreenSky may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other employees in light of the Mergers.
Uncertainty about the effect of the Mergers on GreenSky employees may impair GreenSky’s ability to attract, retain and motivate personnel prior to and following the Mergers. Employee retention may be particularly challenging
during the pendency of the Mergers, as employees of GreenSky may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined business. If employees of GreenSky depart, the integration of the companies may be more difficult and the combined business following the Mergers may be harmed, and the anticipated benefits of the Mergers may be adversely affected.
Completion of the Mergers is subject to many conditions and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the Mergers will not be completed.
The obligation of each party to the Merger Agreement to complete the Mergers is subject to the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver) of a number of conditions, including, among others: (i) certain governmental approvals having been obtained or received (without the imposition of a Materially Burdensome Regulatory Condition (as defined in the Merger Agreement)) and (ii) the absence of any judgment or law issued by any governmental entity enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Mergers. There is no assurance that the conditions to the closing of the Mergers will be satisfied or waived or that the Mergers will be completed. See “Risk Factors—Failure to complete the Mergers could negatively impact the stock price and the future business and financial results of GreenSky.”
In order to complete the Mergers, Goldman Sachs and GreenSky must obtain certain governmental authorizations, and if such authorizations are not granted or are granted with conditions to the parties, the closing of the Mergers may be jeopardized or the anticipated benefits of the Mergers could be reduced.
The closing of the Mergers is conditioned upon obtaining certain required governmental authorizations, including the approval of the New York Department of Financial Services. Although Goldman Sachs and GreenSky have agreed in the Merger Agreement to use their reasonable best efforts, subject to certain limitations, to obtain the required governmental authorizations, there is no assurance that the relevant authorizations will be obtained. In addition, the governmental authorities from which these authorizations must be obtained have broad discretion in administering the governing regulations. Adverse developments in Goldman Sachs’s or GreenSky’s regulatory standing or any other factors considered by regulators in granting such approvals; governmental, political or community group inquiries, investigations or opposition; or changes in legislation or the political environment generally could affect whether and when required governmental authorizations are granted. As a condition to authorization of the Mergers, governmental authorities may impose requirements, limitations or costs or place restrictions on the conduct of Goldman Sachs’s business after completion of the Mergers. There is no assurance that regulators will not impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions and that such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not have the effect of delaying the closing of the Mergers or imposing additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of the combined company following the Mergers or otherwise adversely affecting Goldman Sachs’s business and results of operations after completion of the Mergers. In addition, there is no assurance that these terms, obligations or restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment of the Mergers.
GreenSky’s business relationships may be subject to disruption due to uncertainty associated with the Mergers.
Parties with which GreenSky does business may experience uncertainty associated with the Mergers, including with respect to current or future business relationships with GreenSky or the combined business resulting from the Mergers. GreenSky’s business relationships may be subject to disruption as parties with which GreenSky does business may attempt to negotiate changes in existing business relationships or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than GreenSky or the combined business. These disruptions could have an adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or prospects of the combined business, including an adverse effect on the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers. The risk, and adverse effect, of such disruptions could be exacerbated by a delay in completion of the Mergers or termination of the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement limits GreenSky’s ability to pursue alternatives to the Mergers and may discourage other companies from trying to acquire GreenSky for greater consideration than what Goldman Sachs has agreed to pay pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement contains provisions that make it more difficult for GreenSky to sell its business to a party other than Goldman Sachs. These provisions include a general prohibition on GreenSky soliciting any acquisition proposal or offer for a competing transaction. Further, subject to certain exceptions, the GreenSky board of directors will not withdraw or modify in a manner adverse to Goldman Sachs the recommendation of the GreenSky board of directors in favor of the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement, and Goldman Sachs generally has a right
to match any competing acquisition proposals that may be made. In certain circumstances, upon termination of the Merger Agreement, GreenSky will be required to pay a termination fee of $75 million to Goldman Sachs. To the extent that such fee is not promptly paid by GreenSky when due, it will also be required to pay any reasonable and documented costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and expenses) incurred by Goldman Sachs in connection with legal action taken to enforce the Merger Agreement that results in a judgment for such amount against GreenSky, together with interest on the unpaid fee.
While both GreenSky and Goldman Sachs believe these provisions and agreements are reasonable and customary and are not preclusive of other offers, the restrictions, including the added expense of the $75 million termination fee that may become payable by GreenSky to Goldman Sachs in certain circumstances, might discourage a third party that has an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of GreenSky from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share value than the consideration payable in the Mergers pursuant to the Merger Agreement.
Failure to complete the Mergers could negatively impact the stock price and the future business and financial results of GreenSky.
Without realizing any of the benefits it would have realized had it completed the Mergers, GreenSky would be subject to a number of risks, including the following, if the Mergers are not completed:
•GreenSky may experience negative reactions from the financial markets, including in regard to its stock price;
•GreenSky may experience negative reactions from its Bank Partners and other funding sources, customers, merchants, regulators and employees;
•GreenSky will be required to pay certain costs relating to the Mergers, whether or not the Mergers are completed;
•the Merger Agreement places certain restrictions on the conduct of GreenSky’s business prior to completion of the Mergers, and such restrictions, the waiver of which is subject to the written consent of Goldman Sachs (in certain cases not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), and subject to certain exceptions and qualifications, may prevent GreenSky from making certain acquisitions, taking certain other specified actions or otherwise pursuing business opportunities during the pendency of the Mergers that GreenSky would have made, taken or pursued if these restrictions were not in place; and
•matters relating to the Mergers (including integration planning) require substantial commitments of time and resources by GreenSky management, which would otherwise have been devoted to day-to-day operations and other opportunities that may have been beneficial to GreenSky as an independent company.
There is no assurance that the risks described above will not materialize. If any of such risks materializes, it may materially and adversely affect GreenSky’s business, financial condition, financial results, ratings and stock price. In addition, GreenSky could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Mergers or related to any enforcement proceeding commenced against GreenSky to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Mergers are not completed, these risks may materialize and may adversely affect GreenSky’s businesses, financial condition, financial results, ratings and stock price.
The shares of Goldman Sachs common stock to be received by GreenSky stockholders upon completion of the Mergers will have different rights from shares of GreenSky Common Stock.
Upon completion of the Mergers, GreenSky stockholders will no longer be stockholders of GreenSky but will instead become stockholders of Goldman Sachs. GreenSky stockholders’ rights as stockholders will continue to be governed by Delaware law but the terms of the Goldman Sachs certificate of incorporation and the Goldman Sachs bylaws are in some respects materially different than the terms of the GreenSky certificate of incorporation and the GreenSky bylaws, which currently govern the rights of GreenSky stockholders. For further information, see "Comparison of Equityholder Rights" in the Proxy Statement / Prospectus.
After the Mergers, GreenSky stockholders will have a significantly lower ownership and voting interest in Goldman Sachs than they currently have in GreenSky and will exercise less influence over management.
Immediately following completion of the Mergers, GreenSky stockholders will have a significantly lower ownership and voting interest in Goldman Sachs than they currently have in GreenSky. Consequently, GreenSky stockholders who become stockholders of Goldman Sachs following the completion of the Mergers will have less influence over the management and policies of Goldman Sachs than they currently have over the management and policies of GreenSky.
Stockholder litigation could prevent or delay the completion of the Mergers or otherwise negatively impact the business and operations of Goldman Sachs and GreenSky.
Transactions like the Mergers are frequently the subject of litigation or other legal proceedings, including actions alleging that either party’s board of directors breached its respective duties to its company's stockholders by entering into a merger agreement, by failing to obtain a greater value in a transaction for its company's stockholders or any other claims (contractual or otherwise) arising out of a merger or the transactions related thereto. Stockholders of Goldman Sachs and/or GreenSky may file lawsuits against GreenSky, Goldman Sachs and/or the directors and officers of either company in connection with the Mergers. One of the conditions to the closing is that no order, injunction or decree issued by any court or governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint preventing the consummation of the Mergers or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement be in effect. If any plaintiff were successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting Goldman Sachs or GreenSky from consummating the Mergers or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, then such injunction may delay or prevent the effectiveness of the Mergers and could result in significant costs to Goldman Sachs and/or GreenSky, including any cost associated with the indemnification of directors and officers of each company. Goldman Sachs and GreenSky may incur costs in connection with the defense or settlement of any stockholder lawsuits filed in connection with the Mergers. Such litigation and related costs could have an adverse effect on Goldman Sachs’s or GreenSky’s ability to consummate the Mergers or on their respective financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects, including through the possible diversion of either company’s resources or distraction of key personnel.
Goldman Sachs and GreenSky will incur significant costs in connection with the Mergers.
Goldman Sachs and GreenSky have incurred and expect to incur a number of non-recurring costs associated with the Mergers and combining the operations of the two companies. The significant, non-recurring costs associated with the Mergers include, among others, fees and expenses of financial advisors and other advisors and representatives, certain employment-related costs relating to employees of GreenSky, filing fees due in connection with filings required under the HSR Act and filing fees and printing and mailing costs for the Proxy Statement / Prospectus. Certain of these costs have already been incurred or may be incurred regardless of whether the Mergers are completed, including a portion of the fees and expenses of financial advisors and other advisors and representatives and filing fees. Goldman Sachs also have incurred and will incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating and implementing integration plans with respect to the two companies. Goldman Sachs continues to assess the magnitude of these costs, and additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the Mergers and the integration of the two companies’ businesses.
The Mergers may not be accretive, and may be dilutive, to Goldman Sachs’s earnings per share, which may negatively affect the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock following completion of the Mergers.
In connection with the completion of the Mergers, Goldman Sachs expects to issue additional Goldman Sachs common stock. The issuance of new Goldman Sachs common shares could have a negative impact on the market price of Goldman Sachs common stock. Any dilution of Goldman Sachs’s earnings per share could cause the price of shares of Goldman Sachs common stock to decline or grow at a reduced rate.
The future results of the combined company may be adversely impacted if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations following completion of the Mergers.
Following completion of the Mergers, the size of the combined company’s business will be larger than the current size of either Goldman Sachs’s business or GreenSky’s business. The combined company’s ability to successfully manage this expanded business will depend, in part, upon management’s ability to implement an effective
integration of the two companies and its ability to manage a combined business with larger size and scope with the associated increased costs and complexity. There is no assurance that the management of the combined company will be successful or that the combined company will realize the expected benefits currently anticipated from the Mergers.
Business and Industry Risks
The global outbreak of the Consumernovel coronavirus, or COVID-19, initially caused severe disruptions in the U.S. economy and our business, and may further impact our performance and results of operations.
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization designated the novel coronavirus disease (referred to as "COVID-19") as a global pandemic. In response, many U.S. state and local governments instituted restrictions on travel, public gatherings, and non-essential business operations. While state and local governments have removed or relaxed certain restrictions, some remain and additional restrictions may be imposed or reimposed. These restrictions significantly impacted the macroeconomic environment, including consumer confidence, unemployment and other economic indicators that contribute to consumer spending behavior and demand for credit. Furthermore, our results of operations are impacted by the relative strength of the overall economy. As general economic conditions improve or deteriorate, the amount of consumer disposable income tends to fluctuate, which, in turn, impacts consumer spending levels and the willingness of consumers to take out loans to finance purchases. In addition, trends within the industry verticals in which we operate affect consumer spending on the products and services our merchants offer in those industry verticals.
The extent to which COVID-19 will impact our business, results of operations and financial condition is dependent on many factors, which are highly uncertain, including, but not limited to, the duration and severity of the outbreak, the actions to contain the virus or mitigate its impact, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions will resume. If we experience a prolonged decline in transaction volume or increases in delinquencies, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We may experience higher instances of default, which will adversely affect our business, including, but not limited to, the credit profile of our servicing portfolio, the incentive payments we receive from our Bank Partners and the required escrow payments under our financial guarantee arrangements with our Bank Partners. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our liquidity position and could limit our ability to grow our business or fully execute on our business strategy, including entering into alternative funding arrangements. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic could negatively impact our ability to retain existing, and attract new, Bank Partners and other funding sources for the GreenSky program.
The COVID-19 pandemic also resulted in us modifying certain business practices, such as restricting employee travel and executing on a company-wide work-from-home program. We may take further actions as required by government authorities or as we determine to be in the best interests of our associates, Bank Partners, merchants and GreenSky program borrowers. We may experience future financial losses or disruptions due to a number of operational factors, including, but not limited to:
•increased cyber and payment fraud risk related to COVID-19, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruption, given increased online banking, e-commerce and other online activity;
•challenges to the security, availability and reliability of our platform due to changes to normal operations, including the possibility of one or more clusters of COVID-19 cases affecting our employees or affecting the systems or employees of our partners; and
•an increased volume of customer and regulatory requests for information and support, or new regulatory requirements, which could require additional resources and costs to address, including, for example, government initiatives to reduce or eliminate payments costs.
Even after the COVID-19 pandemic significantly subsides, our business may continue to be unfavorably impacted by the economic turmoil caused by the pandemic. Because a widespread pandemic such as COVID-19 has not occurred in many years, it is unlikely that historical loss experience will accurately predict loan performance over the near future. There are no recent comparable events that could serve to indicate the ultimate effect the COVID-19
pandemic may have and, as such, we do not at this time know what the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will be on our business. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it may also heighten other risks described in this Part I, Item 1A.
For additional discussion of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, see additional risk factors included in this Part I, Item 1A, as well as Part II, Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Services IndustryCondition and Results of Operations–Executive Summary."
Our agreements with our Bank Partners are non-exclusive, short-termshort term in duration and subject to termination by our Bank Partners upon the occurrence of certain events, including our failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If such agreements expire or are terminated, and we are unable to replace the commitments of the expiring or terminating Bank Partners, our business would be adversely affected.
We rely on our Bank Partners to originate all of the loans made through the GreenSky program. Our five largest Bank Partners: BMO Harris Bank, Fifth Third Bank, Regions Bank, SunTrust Bank and Synovus Bank, provided approximately 89% of the commitments to originate loans as of December 31, 2018. We have entered into separate loan origination agreements and servicing agreements with each of our Bank Partners. The loan origination agreementsPartners, each generally containcontaining customary termination provisions that allow our Bank Partners to terminate the agreement uponand, in certain events including, among other things, our breach of the loan origination agreement or servicing agreement, underperformance of loan portfolios or regulatory requirements; and certain loan origination agreements, including loan origination agreements with certain of our largest Bank Partners, entitleinstances, entitling the Bank Partner to terminate the agreementits agreements for convenience. Our servicingBank Partners could decide to terminate or not to renew their agreements for any number of reasons, including, for example, perceived or actual erosion in the credit quality or performance of loans, the geographic or other (such as home improvement loans) concentration of loans, the type of loan products offered (such as deferred payment loans), strategic decisions to make fewer consumer loans or loans originated through channels such as ours, alternative investment opportunities that are expected to be more favorable, increases in required loan loss reserves and required margins, dissatisfaction with our performance as administrator of our program or as servicer, reduced availability of funds for originating new loans, regulatory concerns regarding any of the foregoing factors or others, or general economic conditions, including those that are expected to impact consumer spending, consumer credit or default rates. From time to time, certain of our Bank Partners have requested adjustments to the volume or type of loans that they originate, including, on occasion, temporary increases, decreases or suspensions of originations. We have generally honored these requests in the ordinary course of our relationships with our Bank Partners generally contain customary termination provisions that allow our Bank Partnersand, to terminate our servicing of loans underdate, they have not had a significant impact on the agreement upon certain events including, among other things, our breach of the loan origination agreement or servicing agreement.GreenSky program. If any of our largest Bank Partners were to terminate their agreementsits relationship with us, it wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our business. See Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Factors Affecting our Performance–Bank Partner Relationships; Other Funding" for more information regarding our Bank Partner relationships.
Our agreements with our Bank Partners generally have automatically renewable one-year terms. These agreements are non-exclusive and do not prohibit our Bank Partners from working with our competitors or from offering competing products, except that certain Bank Partners have agreed not to provide customer financing outside of the GreenSky program to our merchants and Sponsors (as defined below) during the term of their agreements with us and generally for one year after termination or expiration. "Sponsors" refers to manufacturers, their captive and franchised showroom operations, and trade associations with which we partner to onboard merchants.expiration of such agreements. As a result of the foregoing, any of our Bank Partners could with minimal notice decide that working with us is not in its interest, could offer us less favorable or unfavorable economic or other terms or could decide to enter into exclusive or more favorable relationships with one of our competitors. We also could have future disagreements or disputes with our Bank Partners, which could negatively affect or threaten our relationships with them.
Our Bank Partners also may terminate their agreements with us if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements applicable to them. We are a service provider to our Bank Partners, and, as a result, we are subject to audit by our Bank Partners in accordance with customary practice and applicable regulatory guidance related to management by banks of third-party vendors. We also are subject to the examination and enforcement authority of the federal banking agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as a bank service company, and are subject to the examination and enforcement authority of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) as a service provider to a covered person under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). It is imperative that our Bank Partners continue to have confidence in our compliance efforts. Any substantial failure, or alleged or perceived failure, by us to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could cause themour Bank Partners to be unwilling to originate loans through our program or could cause them to terminate their agreements with us. See “-Risks“–Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment.”
If we are unsuccessful in maintaining our relationships with our Bank Partners for any of the foregoing or other reasons, or if we are unable to develop relationships with new Bank Partners or other funding sources, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to grow.
Our results of operations and continued growth depend on our ability to retain existing, and attract new, merchants, Bank Partners, and Bank Partners.other funding sources.
A substantial majority of our total revenue is generated from the transaction fees that we receive from our merchants and, to a lesser extent, servicing and other fees that we receive from our Bank Partners and other funding sources in connection with loans made by our Bank Partners to the customers of our merchants. Approximately 84%73%of our total revenue for theyear ended December 31, 20182021 was generated from transaction fees paid to us by our merchants. To attract and retain merchants, we market our program to them on the basis of a number of factors, including financing
terms, the flexibility of promotional offerings, loan approval rates, speed and simplicity of loan origination, service levels, products and services, technological capabilities and integration, customer service, brand and reputation.
There is significant competition for our existing merchants. If we fail to retain any of our larger merchants or a substantial number of our smaller merchants, and we do not acquire new merchants of similar size and profitability, it would have a material adverse effect on our business and future growth. We have experienced some turnover in our merchants, as well as varying activation rates and volatility in usage of the GreenSky program by our merchants, and this may continue or even increase in the future. Program agreements generally are terminable by merchants at any time. Also, we generally do not have exclusive arrangements with our merchants, and they are free to use our competitors’ programs at any time and without notice to us. If a significant number of our existing merchants were to use other competing programs, thereby reducing their use of our program, it would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Competition for new merchants also is significant especially in industry verticals in which we do not have an established reputation, such as elective healthcare. As a result,and our continued success and growth depend on our ability to attract new merchants, including in new verticals, and ourmerchants. Our failure to do so wouldcould limit our growth and our ability to continue generating revenue at current levels.
Our failure to retain existing, and attract and retain new, Bank Partners or other funding sources also could materially adversely affect our business and our ability to grow. We market our program to banks and other funding sources on the basis of the risk-adjusted yields available to them and geographic diversity of the loans that they are able to originateoriginated through the GreenSky program, as well as the absence of significant upfront and ongoing costs and the general attractivenesscreditworthiness of the consumers that use the GreenSky program. Bank Partners and other investors have alternative sources for attractive, if not similar, loans, including, for Bank Partners, internal loan generation, and they could elect to originate or invest in loans through those alternatives rather than through the GreenSky program.
Based upon current commitment levels, our five largest Bank Partners are BMO Harris Bank, Fifth Third Bank, Regions Bank, SunTrust Bank and Synovus Bank. As of December 31, 2018, they provided approximately 89% of the overall commitments to originate loans through our program. If any of our larger, Bank Partners, or a substantial number of our smaller, Bank Partners were to suspend, limit or otherwise terminate their relationships with us, it wouldcould have a material adverse effect on our business. If we need to enter into arrangements with a different bank to replace one of our Bank Partners, we may not be able to negotiate a comparable alternative arrangement. See Part II, Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Factors Affecting our Performance–Bank Partner Relationships; Other Funding" for more information regarding our Bank Partner relationships.
A large percentage of our revenue is concentrated with our top ten merchants, and the loss of a significant merchant could have a negative impact on our operating results.
Our top ten merchants (including certain groups of affiliated merchants) accounted for an aggregate of 27%29% of our total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The Home Depot is our most significant single merchant and represented approximately 5% of total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018. In addition,followed by, affiliates of Renewal by Andersen, our largest Sponsor, represented together approximately 19% of total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018.which affiliates include Andersen Corporation-owned licensed dealers and independent owned and operated Renewal by Andersen licensed dealers. Our agreement with Renewal by Andersen provides that Renewal by Andersen will promote the GreenSky program through notifying its dealers of the availability of the GreenSky program and providing them ancillary materials. Both parties have the right to terminate the agreement generally upon 90-days90 days' notice. If Renewal by Andersen terminates the agreement, Renewal by Andersen dealers would not be obligated to terminate their participation in the
GreenSky program, although they could choose to do so. We expect to have significant concentration in our largest merchant relationships for the foreseeable future. In the event that (i) The Home Depot or one or more of our other significant merchants, or groups of merchants, or (ii) Renewal by Andersen or one or more of our other significant Sponsors, and their dealers, terminate their relationships with us, or elect to utilize an alternative source for financing, the number of loans originated through the GreenSky program wouldcould decline, which would materially adversely affect our business and, in turn, our revenue.
Our results depend, to a significant extent, on the active and effective promotion and support of the GreenSky program by our Sponsors and merchants.
Our success depends on the active and effective promotion of the GreenSky program by our Sponsors to their network of merchants and by our merchants to their customers. We rely on our Sponsors, including large franchisors within different home improvement industry sub-verticals, to promote the GreenSky program within their networks of merchants. A majority of our active merchants are affiliated with Sponsors. Although our Sponsors generally are under no obligation to promote the GreenSky program, many do so through direct mail, email campaigns and trade shows. The failure by our Sponsors to effectively promote and support the GreenSky program would have a material adverse effect on the rate at which we acquire new merchants and the cost thereof.
We also depend on our merchants, which generally accept most major credit cards and other forms of payment, to promote the GreenSky program, to integrate our platform and the GreenSky program into their business, and to educate their sales associates about the benefits of the GreenSky program so that their sales associates encourage customers to apply for and use our services. Our relationship with our merchants, however, generally is non-exclusive, and we do not have, or utilize, any recourse against merchants when they do not promote the GreenSky program. The failure by our merchants to effectively promote and support the GreenSky program would have a material adverse effect on our business.
If our merchants fail to fulfill their obligations to consumers or comply with applicable law, we may incur remediation costs.
Although our merchants are obligated to fulfill their contractual commitments to consumers and to comply with applicable law, from time to time they might not, or a consumer might allege that they did not. This, in turn, can result in claims against our Bank Partners and us or in loans being uncollectible. In those cases, we may decide that it is beneficial to remediate the situation, either through assisting the consumers to get a refund, working with our Bank Partners to modify the terms of the loan or reducing the amount due, making a payment to the consumer or otherwise. Historically, the cost of remediation has not been material to our business, but we make no assurance that it will notcould be in the future. In addition, for loan receivables held for sale, including SPV Participations, we may be subject to similar risks during the ownership period for such participations.
We have been in the past and may in the future be subject to federal and state regulatory inquiries regarding our business.
We have, from time to time in the normal course of our business, received, and may in the future receive or be subject to, inquiries or investigations by state and federal regulatory agencies and bodies such as the CFPB, state attorneys general, state financial regulatory agencies, and other state or federal agencies or bodies regarding GreenSky and its business, including with respect to the origination and servicing of consumer loans, practices by merchants and other third parties, and licensing and registration requirements. Regulatory actions, among other things, can result in injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, civil monetary penalties, customer remediation and other corrective action, and can also lead to claims by third parties.
In addition, we have entered into regulatory agreements with state agencies regarding issues including merchant conduct and oversight and loan pricing and may enter into similar agreements in the future. We also have received inquiries from state regulatory agencies regarding requirements to obtain licenses from or register with those states, including in states where we have determined that we are not required to obtain such a license or be registered with the state, and we expect to continue to receive such inquiries. Any such inquiries or investigations could involve substantial time and expense to analyze and respond to, could divert management’s attention and other resources from running our business, and could lead to public enforcement actions or lawsuits and fines, penalties, injunctive relief, and the need to obtain additional licenses that we do not currently possess. Our involvement in any such
matters, whether tangential or otherwise and even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation, raise concerns with our Bank Partners and merchants, lead to additional investigations and enforcement actions from other agencies or litigants, and further divert management attention and resources from the operation of our business. As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions arising out of any state or federal inquiries we receive could be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced rapid growth, which if again experienced may be difficult to sustain and which may place significant demands on our operational, administrative and financial resources.
The number of loans originated throughPrior to the GreenSky program grew from approximately 385,000 in 2016 to approximately 675,000 in 2018, and our total revenue grew from $264 million in 2016 to $415 million in 2018. OurCOVID-19 pandemic, we experienced rapid growth haswhich caused significant demands on our operational, marketing, compliance and accounting infrastructure, and has resulted in increased expenses, which weexpenses. We expect to continue as we grow.again experience rapid growth after the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we are requiredneed to continuously develop and adapt our systems and infrastructure in response to the increasing sophistication of the consumer finance market and regulatory developments relating to our existing and projected business activities and those of our Bank Partners. Our future growth will depend, among other things, on our ability to maintain an operating platform and management system sufficient to address our growth and will require us to incur significant additional expenses and to commit additional senior management and operationaloperation resources.
As a result of our growth, we face significant challenges in:
•securing commitments from our existing and new Bank Partners and other funding sources to provide loans to customers of our merchants;
•maintaining existing and developing new relationships with merchants and Sponsors;
•maintaining adequate financial, business and risk controls;
•implementing new or updated information and financial and risk controls and procedures;
•training, managing and appropriately sizing our workforce and other components of our business on a timely and cost-effective basis;
•navigating complex and evolving regulatory and competitive environments;
•securing funding (including credit facilities and/or equity capital) to maintain our operations and future growth;
•increasing the number of borrowers in, and the volume of loans facilitated through, the GreenSky program;
•expanding within existing markets;
•entering into new markets and introducing new solutions;
•continuing to revise our proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models;
•continuing to develop, maintain and scale our platform;
•effectively using limited personnel and technology resources;
•maintaining the security of our platform and the confidentiality of the information (including personally identifiable information) provided and utilized across our platform; and
•attracting, integrating and retaining an appropriate number of qualified employees.
We may not be able to manage our expanding operations effectively, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses.
If we experience negative publicity, we may lose the confidence of our Bank Partners, other funding sources, merchants and consumers who use the GreenSky program and our business may suffer.
Reputational risk, or the risk to us from negative publicity or public opinion, is inherent to our business. Recently, consumer financial services companies have been experiencing increased reputational harm as consumers and regulators take issue with certain of their practices and judgments, including, for example, fair lending, credit reporting accuracy, lending to members of the military, state licensing (for lenders, servicers and money transmitters) and debt collection. Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to our ability to attract and retain Bank
Partners, other funding sources, merchants, consumers, investors and employees. Negative public opinion can arise from many sources, including actual or alleged misconduct, errors or improper business practices by employees, Bank Partners, merchants, outsourced service providers or other counterparties; litigation or regulatory actions; failure by us, our Bank Partners, or merchants to meet minimum standards of service and quality; inadequate protection of consumer information; failure of merchants to adhere to the terms of their GreenSky program agreements or other contractual arrangements or standards; compliance failures; and media coverage, whether accurate or not. Negative public opinion cancould diminish the value of our brand and adversely affect our ability to attract and retain Bank Partners, other funding sources, merchants and consumers, as a result of which our results of operations may be materially harmed and we could be exposed to litigation and regulatory action.
We may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize new or enhanced products and services.
The consumer financial services industry is subject to rapid and significant changes in technologies, products and services. Our business is dependent upon technological advancement, such as our ability to process applications instantly, accept electronic signatures and provide other conveniences expected by borrowers and counterparties. We must ensure that our technology facilitates a consumer experience that is quick and easy and equals or exceeds the consumer experience provided by our competitors. Therefore, a key part of our financial success depends on our ability to develop and commercialize new products and services and enhancements to existing products and services, including with respect to mobile and point-of-sale technologies.
Realizing the benefit of such products and services is uncertain, and we may not assign the appropriate level of resources, priority or expertise to the development and commercialization of these new products, services or enhancements. Our ability to develop, acquire and commercialize competitive technologies, products and services on acceptable terms, or at all, may be limited by intellectual property rights that third parties, including competitors and potential competitors, may assert. In addition, our success is dependent on factors such as merchant and customer acceptance, adoption and usage, competition, the effectiveness of marketing programs, the availability of appropriate technologies and business processes and regulatory approvals. Success of a new product,
service or enhancement also may depend upon our ability to deliver it on a large scale, which may require a significant investment.
We also could utilize and invest in technologies, products and services that ultimately do not achieve widespread adoption and, therefore, are not as attractive or useful to our merchants and their customers as we anticipate. Our merchants also may not recognize the value of new products and services or believe they justify any potential costs or disruptions in the loan origination process associated with implementing them. Because our solution is typically marketed through our merchants, if our merchants are unwilling or unable to effectively implement or market new technologies, products, services or enhancements, we may be unable to grow our business. Competitors also may develop or adopt technologies or introduce innovations that change the markets they operate in and make our solution less competitive and attractive to our merchants and their customers. Moreover, we may not realize the benefit of new technologies, products, services or enhancements for many years, and competitors may introduce more compelling products, services or enhancements in the meantime.
Changes in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on our business.
The fixed interest rates charged on the loans that our Bank Partners originate are calculated based upon a margin above a market benchmark at the time of origination. Increases in the market benchmark would result in increases in the interest rates on new loans. Increased interest rates may adversely impact the spending levels of consumers and their ability and willingness to borrow money. Higher interest rates often lead to higher payment obligations, which may reduce the ability of customers to remain current on their obligations to our Bank Partners and, therefore, lead to increased delinquencies, defaults, customer bankruptcies and charge-offs, and decreasing recoveries, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business. See Part II,I, Item 7A “Quantitative3 "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”"
Increases in loan delinquencies and default rates in the GreenSky program could cause us to lose amounts we place in escrow and may require us to deploy resources to enhance our collections and default servicing capabilities, which could adversely affect our ability to maintain loan volumes.volumes, and could affect our ability to pursue or close alternative funding structures.
Loans funded by our Bank Partners generally are not secured by collateral, are not guaranteed or insured by any third party and are not backed by any governmental authority in any way, which limits the ability of our Bank Partners to collect on loans if a borrower is unwilling or unable to repay. A borrower’s ability to repay can be negatively impacted by increases in the borrower’s payment obligations to other lenders under home, credit card and other loans; loss of employment or other sources of income; adverse health conditions; or for other reasons. Changes in a borrower’s ability to repay loans made by our Bank Partners also could result from increases in base lending rates or structured increases in payment obligations. While consumers using our platform to date have had high average credit scores, we may enter into new industry verticals in which consumers have lower average credit scores or open our existing verticals to consumers with lower average credit scores, leading to potentially higher rates of delinquencies and defaults.
Should delinquencies and default rates increase, we will need to expand our collections and default servicing capabilities, which will require skills andadditional resources that we currently may not have. This will result in higher costs due to the time and effort required to collect payments from delinquent borrowers.
While we are not generally responsible to our Bank Partners for defaults by customers, we have agreed with each of our Bank Partners to fund an escrow in order to provide the Bank Partners limited protection against credit losses. If credit losses increase, we could lose a portion, or all, of these escrowed funds, which would have an adverse effect on our business.
Because the agreements we have with our Bank Partners are of short duration and because our Bank Partners generally may terminate their agreements or reduce their commitments to provide loans if credit losses increase, funding for the overall volume of GreenSky program loans maycould decrease in the event of higher default rates. In addition, in certain limited circumstances, our Bank Partners may terminate the agreements under which we service their loan portfolios, in which case we will suffer a decrease in our revenues from loan servicing.
In addition, an increase in delinquencies and default rates may have an adverse effect on our ability to pursue, or negotiate the terms of, alternative funding structures with institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources, if reduced returns would be expected as a result of such increase.
We own receivables forparticipations in certain loans originated through the GreenSky program, and the non-performance, or even significant underperformance, of those receivablesparticipations would adversely affect our business.
We hold some of the receivables underlying theparticipations in certain loans originated by our Bank Partners in order to facilitate alternative funding structures. In May 2020, the Warehouse SPV established an asset-backed revolving credit facility with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to finance purchases by the Warehouse SPV of participation interests in loans originated through the GreenSky program (the "Warehouse Facility"). The Warehouse SPV has conducted periodic sales of the Warehouse Loan Participations to third parties and may conduct additional periodic sales of the Warehouse Loan Participations or issue asset-backed securities to third parties, which sales and issuances will allow additional purchases of participations to be financed through the Warehouse Facility. We have formed another special purpose vehicle to facilitate sales of loan participations and whole loans, and in the future we may form other special purpose vehicles for similar purposes. The Warehouse SPV and any such other special purpose vehicles may not be able to conduct such sales or issuances in a timely manner or at expected prices, if at all. In addition, the Company issues commitments to purchase loan participations from time to time to a Bank Partner as part of the Company's facilitation of loan participation sales to third parties.
If we are not able to sell to third-party purchasers the loan participations that we own or have a commitment to purchase, then we will bear the credit risk of such loan participations while we own them. Furthermore, in this event, our ability to finance additional purchases of participations through the Warehouse Facility would be limited. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We also hold participations in certain research and development loans, which we refer to as “R&D Receivables” and which are designated as loan receivables held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018, we had $2.9 million in loan receivables held for sale, net.Participations.” Generally, we hold R&D ReceivablesParticipations that we purchase from an originating Bank Partner with the intent to hold the loan receivablesR&D Participations only for a short period of time before we can transfer the loan receivablesR&D Participations to a Bank Partner following its determination to purchase the loan receivables,R&D Participations, which a Bank Partner might do in connection with an expansion of its credit policy. Our objective is to hold these receivablesR&D Participations only until we have enough experience with the particular products or industry verticals for our Bank Partners to purchase the receivables. However, there is no assurance that ourR&D Participations. Our Bank Partners willmay not purchase the R&D Participations.
Both the Warehouse Loan Participations and the R&D Participations are designated as loan receivables underlying these loans and, duringheld for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021, we had $5.3 million in loan receivables held for sale, net. During the period that we own thesuch receivables, we bear the entire credit risk in the event that the borrowers default.
In addition, we are obligated to purchase from our Bank Partners the receivables underlying any loans that were approved in error or otherwise involved customer or merchant fraud.
Our ownership of receivables also requires us to commit or obtain corresponding funding. In addition, non-performance, or even significant underperformance, of the loan receivables held for sale that we own could have a materially adverse effect on our business.business, including with respect to the Warehouse Loan Participations, an inability to repay obligations owed by the Warehouse SPV under the Warehouse Facility.
The replacement of London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") and replacement or reform of other interest rate benchmarks could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
LIBOR and certain other interest rate benchmarks are the subject of recent national, international and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, has publicly announced that U.S. dollar LIBOR will no longer be quoted as of June 30, 2023, and new U.S. dollar LIBOR contracts will not be permitted beginning in 2022. LIBOR is currently used as a reference rate for certain of our contractual arrangements, including our term loan under the Amended Credit Agreements (discussed in Part II, Item 8 - Note 7. Borrowings), which is set to mature after the expected phase out of LIBOR. Our Warehouse Facility and the related interest rate cap agreement also include certain rates which are impacted by LIBOR, however, the agreement includes LIBOR transition provisions.
The market transition away from LIBOR to alternative reference rates is complex and could have a range of adverse effects on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In particular, any such transition could:
•adversely affect the interest rates received or paid in our contractual arrangements;
•prompt inquiries or other actions from regulators in respect of the Company’s preparation and readiness for the replacement of LIBOR with an alternative reference rate;
•result in disputes, litigation or other actions with borrowers or counterparties about the interpretation and enforceability of certain fallback language in LIBOR-based contracts and securities; and
•cause us to incur additional costs in relation to any of the above factors.
We will work with our lenders and counterparties to accommodate any suitable replacement rate where it is not already provided under the terms of the financial instruments. If an agreement cannot be reached on an appropriate benchmark rate, the availability of borrowings under these agreements could be adversely impacted.
We are subject to certain additional risks in connection with promotional financing offered through the GreenSky program.
Many of the loans originated by our Bank Partners provide promotional financing in the form of low or deferred interest. When a deferred interest loan is paid in full prior to the end of the promotional period (typically six to 24 months), any interest that has been billed on the loan by our Bank Partner to the consumer is reversed, which triggers an obligation on our part to make a payment to the Bank Partner that made the loan in order to fully offset the reversal (each event, a finance charge reversal or "FCR"). We record a FCR liability on our balance sheet for
interest previously billed during the promotional period that is expected to be reversed prior to the end of such period. As of December 31, 2018,2021, this liability was $138.6 million, up from $94.1 million as of December 31, 2017.$143.5 million. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further information. If the rate at which deferred interest loans are paid in full prior to the end of the promotional period materially increases over and above expected amounts, resulting in increased payments by us to our Bank Partners, it would adversely affect our business.
Further, deferred interest loans are subject to enhanced regulatory scrutiny as a result of abusive marketing practices by some lenders, and the CFPB has initiated enforcement actions against both lenders and servicers alleging that they have engaged in unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices because of lack of clarity in disclosures with respect to such loans. Such scrutiny could reduce the attractiveness to consumers of deferred interest loans or result in a general unwillingness on the part of our Bank Partners to make deferred interest loans or institutional investors to purchase participations in such loans. A reduction in the dollar volume of deferred interest loans offered through the GreenSky Programprogram would adversely affect our business.
The loss of the services of our senior management could adversely affect our business.
The experience of our senior management, including, in particular, David Zalik, our Chief Executive Officer, is a valuable asset to us. Our management team has significant experience in the consumer loan business and would be difficult to replace. Competition for senior executives in our industry is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or succeed members of our senior management team or other key personnel. Failure to retain talented senior leadership could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain key life insurance policies relating to our senior management.
Our vendor relationships subject us to a variety of risks, and the failure of third parties to comply with legal or regulatory requirements or to provide various services that are important to our operations could have an adverse effect on our business.
We have significant vendors that, among other things, provide us with financial, technology and other services to support our loan servicing and other activities, including, for example, credit ratings and reporting, cloud-based data storage and other IT solutions, and payment processing. The CFPB has issued guidance stating that institutions under its supervision may be held responsible for the actions of the companies with which they
contract. Accordingly, we could be adversely impacted to the extent our vendors fail to comply with the legal requirements applicable to the particular products or services being offered.
In some cases, third-party vendors are the sole source, or one of a limited number of sources, of the services they provide to us. Most of our vendor agreements are terminable on little or no notice, and if our current vendors were to stop providing services to us on acceptable terms, we may be unable to procure alternatives from other vendors in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms (or at all). If any third-party vendor fails to provide the services we require, fails to meet contractual requirements (including compliance with applicable laws and regulations), fails to maintain adequate data privacy and electronic security systems, or suffers a cyber-attack or other security breach, we could be subject to CFPB, FTC and other regulatory enforcement actions and suffer economic and reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, we may incur significant costs to resolve any such disruptions in service, which could adversely affect our business.
Litigation, regulatory actions and compliance issues could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments, remediation costs and/or requirements resulting in increased expenses.
Our business is subject to increased risks of litigation and regulatory actions as a result of a number of factors and from various sources, including as a result of the highly regulated nature of the financial services industry and the focus of state and federal enforcement agencies on the financial services industry.
In the ordinary course of business, we have been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation. Generally, this litigation arises from the dissatisfaction of a consumer with the products or services of a merchant; some of this litigation, however, has arisen from other matters, including claims of discrimination, credit reporting and collection practices. Certain of those actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. From time to time, we also are involved in, or the subject of, reviews, requests for information, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by state and federal governmental agencies, including banking regulators and the CFPB, regarding our business activities and our qualifications to conduct our business in certain jurisdictions, which could subject us to significant fines, penalties, obligations to change our business practices and other requirements resulting in increased expenses and diminished earnings. Our involvement in any such matter also could cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the operation of our business, even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor. We have in the past chosen to settle (and may in the future choose to settle) certain matters in order to avoid the time and expense of contesting them. Although none of the settlements has been material to our business, there is no assurance that, in the future, such settlements will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, any settlement, or any consent order or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by a government agency, may prompt litigation or additional investigations or proceedings as other litigants or other government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities.
In addition, a number of participants in the consumer finance industry have been the subject of putative class action lawsuits; state attorney general actions and other state regulatory actions; federal regulatory enforcement actions, including actions relating to alleged unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices; violations of state licensing and lending laws, including state usury laws; actions alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or other prohibited bases; and allegations of noncompliance with various state and federal laws and regulations relating to originating and servicing consumer finance loans. The current regulatory environment, increased regulatory compliance efforts and enhanced regulatory enforcement have resulted in significant operational and compliance costs and may prevent us from providing certain products and services. There is no assurance that these regulatory matters or other factors will not, in the future, affect how we conduct our business and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, legal proceedings brought under state consumer protection statutes or under several of the various federal consumer financial services statutes subject to the jurisdiction of the CFPB may result in a separate fine for each violation of the statute, which, particularly in the case of class action lawsuits, could result in damages substantially in excess of the amounts we earned from the underlying activities.
We contest our liability and the amount of damages, as appropriate, in each pending matter. The outcome of pending and future matters could be material to our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and could materially adversely affect our business.
In addition, from time to time, through our operational and compliance controls, we identify compliance issues that require us to make operational changes and, depending on the nature of the issue, result in financial remediation to impacted customers. These self-identified issues and voluntary remediation payments could be significant, depending on the issue and the number of customers impacted, and also could generate litigation or regulatory investigations that subject us to additional risk. See “-Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment.”
Regulatory agencies and consumer advocacy groups are becoming more aggressive in asserting “disparate impact” claims.
Antidiscrimination statutes, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (the “ECOA”), prohibit creditors from discriminating against loan applicants and borrowers based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion and national origin. Various federal regulatory agencies and departments, including the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and CFPB, take the position that these laws prohibit not only intentional discrimination, but also neutral practices that have a “disparate impact” on a group and that are not justified by a business necessity.
These regulatory agencies, as well as consumer advocacy groups and plaintiffs’ attorneys, are focusing greater attention on “disparate impact” claims. To the extent that the “disparate impact” theory continues to apply, we may face significant administrative burdens in attempting to identify and eliminate neutral practices that do have “disparate impact.” The ability to identify and eliminate neutral practices that have “disparate impact” is complicated by the fact that often it is our merchants, over which we have limited control, that implement our practices. In addition, we face the risk that one or more of the variables included in the GreenSky program’s loan decisioning model may be invalidated under the disparate impact test, which would require us to revise the loan decisioning model in a manner that might generate lower approval rates or higher credit losses.
In addition to reputational harm, violations of the ECOA can result in actual damages, punitive damages, injunctive or equitable relief, attorneys’ fees and civil money penalties.
Fraudulent activity could negatively impact our business and could cause our Bank Partners to be less willing to originate loans as part of the GreenSky program.
Fraud is prevalent in the financial services industry and is likely to increase as perpetrators become more sophisticated. We are subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associated with our merchants, their customers and third parties handling customer information. Our resources, technologies and fraud prevention tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. The level of our fraud charge-offs could increase and our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if fraudulent activity were to significantly increase. High profile fraudulent activity also could negatively impact our brand and reputation, which could negatively impact the use of our services and products. In addition, significant increases in fraudulent activity could lead to regulatory intervention, which could increase our costs and also negatively impact our business.
Cyber-attacksMisconduct and other security breaches could have an adverse effect onerrors by our business.
In the normal course of our business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential information regarding our Bank Partners, our merchants and consumers. We also have arrangements in place with certain of our third-party service providers that require us to share consumer information. Although we devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of our systems through information security and business continuity programs, our facilities and systems, and those of our Bank Partners, merchantsemployees and third-party service providers could harm our business and reputation.
We are vulnerableexposed to external or internal security breaches, actsmany types of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or humanoperational risks, including the risk of misconduct and errors by our employees and other similar events. We,third-party service providers. Our business depends on our Bank Partners, our merchantsemployees and our third-party service providers have experienced all of these events into facilitate the past and expect to continue to experience them in the future. We also face security threats from malicious third parties that could obtain unauthorized access to our systems and networks, which threats we anticipate will continue to grow in scope and complexity over time. These events could interrupt our business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of our systems, products and
services. Although the impact to date from these events has not had a material adverse effect on us, no assurance is given that this will be the case in the future.
Information security risks in the financial services industry have increased recently, in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized criminals, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. In addition to cyber-attacks and other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers recently have engaged in attacks that are designed to disrupt key business services, such as consumer-facing websites. We may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. We employ detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents. Nonetheless, early detection efforts may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. We also may fail to detect the existence of a security breach related to the information of our Bank Partners, merchants and consumers that we retain as partoperation of our business, and may be unable to prevent unauthorized access to that information.
We also face risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding borrowers through various third parties, including our Bank Partners, our merchants and data processors. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks. Because we do not control these third parties or oversee the security of their systems, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affectingif any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breachesemployees or attacks relating to them. While we regularly conduct security assessments of significant third-party service providers no assurance is given that our third-party information security protocols are sufficientprovide unsatisfactory service or take, convert or misuse funds, documents or data or fail to withstand a cyber-attackfollow protocol when interacting with Bank Partners, Sponsors and merchants, the number of loans originated through the GreenSky program could decline, we could be liable for damages and we could be subject to complaints, regulatory actions and penalties.
While we have internal procedures and oversight functions to protect us against this risk, we also could be perceived to have facilitated or other security breach.
The access by unauthorized persons to,participated in the illegal misappropriation of funds, documents or data, or the improper disclosure by usfailure to follow protocol, and therefore be subject to civil or criminal liability.
Any of confidential information regarding GreenSky program customers or our own proprietary information, software, methodologies and business secretsthese occurrences could interrupt our business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to our reputation or a loss of confidence in the security of our systems, products and services, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, there recently have been a number of well-publicized attacks or breaches affecting companies in the financial services industry that have heightened concern by consumers, which could also intensify regulatory focus, cause users to lose trust in the security of the industry in general and result in reduced use of our services and increased costs, all of which could also have a material adverse effect on our business.
Disruptions in the operation of our computer systems and third-party data centers could have an adverse effect on our business.
Ourdiminished ability to deliver products and services to our Bank Partners and merchants, service loans made by our Bank Partners and otherwise operate our business, and comply with applicable laws depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer systems and third-party data centers, as well as those of ourpotential liability, inability to attract future Bank Partners, other funding sources, Sponsors, merchants and third-party service providers.
These computer systemsconsumers, reputational damage, regulatory intervention and third-party data centers may encounter service interruptions at any time due to system or software failure, natural disasters, severe weather conditions, health pandemics, terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks or other events. Any of such catastrophesfinancial harm, which could have a negative effect onnegatively impact our business, financial condition and technology infrastructure (including our computer network systems), on our Bank Partners and merchants and on consumers. Catastrophic events also could prevent or make it more difficult for customers to travel to our merchants’ locations to shop, thereby negatively impacting consumer spending in the affected regions (or in severe cases, nationally), and could interrupt or disable local or national communications networks, including the payment systems network, which could prevent customers from making purchases or payments (temporarily or over an extended period). These events also could impair the abilityresults of third parties to provide critical services to us. All of these adverse effects of catastrophic events could result in a decrease in the use of our solution and payments to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, the implementation of technology changes and upgrades to maintain current and integrate new systems may cause service interruptions, transaction processing errors or system conversion delays and may cause us to fail to comply with applicable laws, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We expect that new technologies and business processes applicable to the consumer financial services industry will continue to emerge and that these new technologies and business processes may be better than those we currently use. There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully adopt new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete and better ones become available. A failure to maintain and/or improve current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in our operations or cause our solution to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.operations.
If the credit decisioning, pricing, loss forecasting and credit scoring models we use contain errors, do not adequately assess risk or are otherwise ineffective, our reputation and relationships with our Bank Partners, other funding sources, our merchants and consumers could be harmed.
Our ability to attract consumers to the GreenSky program, and to build trust in the consumer loan products offered through the GreenSky program, is significantly dependent on our ability to effectively evaluate a consumer’s credit profile and likelihood of default in accordance with our Bank Partners’ underwriting policies. To conduct this evaluation, we use proprietary credit decisioning, pricing, loss forecasting and credit scoring models. If any of the credit decisioning, pricing, loss forecasting and credit scoring models we use contains programming or other errors, is ineffective or the data provided by consumers or third parties is incorrect or stale, or if we are unable to obtain accurate data from consumers or third parties (such as credit reporting agencies), our loan pricing and approval
process could be negatively affected, resulting in mispriced or misclassified loans or incorrect approvals or denials of loans and possibly our having to repurchase the loan. This could damage our reputation and relationships with consumers, our Bank Partners, other funding sources and our merchants, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers of our merchants, and any misrepresented information could adversely affect our business.
In evaluating loan applicants, we rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of customers of our merchants, including credit, identification, employment and other relevant information. Some of the information regarding customers provided to us is used in our proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models, which we use to determine whether an application meets the applicable underwriting criteria. We rely on the accuracy and completeness of that information.
Not all customer information is independently verified. As a result, we rely on the accuracy and completeness of the information we are provided by consumers.provided. If any of the information that is considered in the loan review process is inaccurate, whether intentional or not, and such inaccuracy is not detected prior to loan funding, the loan may have a greater risk of default than expected. Additionally, there is a risk that, following the date of the credit report that we obtain and review, a customer may have defaulted on, or become delinquent in the payment of, a pre-existing debt obligation, taken on additional debt, lost his or her job or other sources of income, or experienced other adverse financial events. Where an inaccuracy constitutes fraud or otherwise causes us to incorrectly conclude that a loan meets the applicable underwriting criteria, we generally bear the risk of loss associated with the inaccuracy. Any significant increase in inaccuracies or resulting increases in losses would adversely affect our business.
We rely extensively on models in managing many aspects of our business. Any inaccuracies or errors in our models could have an adverse effect on our business.
In assisting our Bank Partners and merchants with the design of the products that are offered on our platform, we make assumptions about various matters, including repayment timing and default rates, and then utilize our proprietary modeling to analyze and forecast the performance and profitability of the products. Our assumptions may be inaccurate and our models may not be as predictive as expected for many reasons, including that they often involve matters that are inherently difficult to predict and beyond our control (e.g., macroeconomic conditions) and that they often involve complex interactions between a number of dependent and independent variables and factors. Any significant inaccuracies or errors in our assumptions could negatively impact the profitability of the products that are offered on our platform, as well as the profitability of our business, and could result in our underestimating potential FCRs.
If assumptions or estimates we use in preparing our financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, our reported results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We are required to make various assumptions and estimates in preparing our financial statements under GAAP, including for purposes of determining FCRs, share-based compensation, asset impairment, reserves related to litigation and other legal matters, and other regulatory exposures and the amounts recorded for certain contractual payments to be paid to, or received from, our merchants and others under contractual arrangements. In addition, significant assumptions and estimates are involved in determining certain disclosures required under GAAP, including those involving fair value measurements. If the assumptions or estimates underlying our financial statements are incorrect, the actual amounts realized on transactions and balances subject to those estimates will be different, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The consumer finance and payments industry is highly competitive and is likely to become more competitive, and our inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve our market share and margins could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends on our ability to generate usage of the GreenSky program. The consumer financial services industry is highly competitive and increasingly dynamic as emerging technologies continue to enter the marketplace. Technological advances and heightened e-commerce activities have increased consumers’ accessibility to products and services, which has intensified the desirability of offering loans to consumers through digital-based solutions. In addition, because many of our competitors are large financial institutions that own the loans that they originate, they have certain revenue opportunities not currently available to us. We face competition in areas such as compliance capabilities, financing terms, promotional offerings, fees, loan approval rates, speed and simplicity of loan origination, ease-of-use, marketing expertise, service levels, products and services, technological capabilities and integration, customer service, brand and reputation. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than we are, which may give those competitors advantages we do not have, such as a more diversified product and customer base, the ability to reach more customers and potential customers, operational efficiencies, more versatile technology platforms, broad-based local distribution capabilities, and lower-cost funding. Commercial banks and savings institutions also may have significantly greater access to consumers given their deposit-taking and other services. In addition, because many of our competitors are large financial institutions that own the loans that they originate, they also have certain revenue opportunities not available to us.
Our existing and potential competitors may decide to modify their pricing and business models to compete more directly with our model. Any reduction in usage of the GreenSky program, or a reduction in the lifetime profitability of loans under the GreenSky program in an effort to attract or retain business, could reduce our revenues and earnings. If we are unable to compete effectively for merchantsmerchant and customer usage, our business could be materially adversely affected.
Our revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of our merchants.
Our business, the consumer financial services industry and our merchants’ businesses are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors such as interest rates, changes in monetary and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence and unemployment rates are among the most significant factors that impact consumer spending behavior. Weak economic conditions or a significant deterioration in economic conditions
reduce the amount of disposable income consumers have, which in turn reduces consumer spending and the willingness of qualified borrowers to take out loans. Such conditions are also likely to affect the ability and willingness of borrowers to pay amounts owed to our Bank Partners, each of which would have a material adverse effect on our business.
The generation of new loans through the GreenSky program, and the transaction fees and other fee income to us associated with such loans, is dependent upon sales of products and services by our merchants. Our merchants’ sales may decrease or fail to increase as a result of factors outside of their control, such as the macroeconomic conditions referenced above, or business conditions affecting a particular merchant, industry vertical or region. Weak economic conditions also could extend the length of our merchants’ sales cycle and cause customers to delay making (or not make) purchases of our merchants’ products and services. The decline of sales by our merchants for any reason will generally result in lower credit sales and, therefore, lower loan volume and associated fee income
for us. This risk is particularly acute with respect to our largest merchants that account for a significant amount of our platform revenue.
In addition, if a merchant closes some or all of its locations or becomes subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding (or if there is a perception that it may become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding), GreenSky program borrowers may have less incentive to pay their outstanding balances to our Bank Partners, which could result in higher charge-off rates than anticipated. Moreover, if the financial condition of a merchant deteriorates significantly or a merchant becomes subject to a bankruptcy proceeding, we may not be able to recover amounts due to us from the merchant.
Because our business is heavily concentrated on consumer lending and payments in the U.S. home improvement industry, our results are more susceptible to fluctuations in that market than the results of a more diversified company would be.
Even though we recently expanded into the elective healthcare industry vertical and may continue expanding our services into other industry verticals, ourOur business currently is heavily concentrated on consumer lending in the home improvement industry. As a result, we are more susceptible to fluctuations and risks particular to U.S. consumer credit, real estate and home improvements than a more diversified company would be as well as to factors that may drive the demand for home improvements, such as sales levels of existing homes and the aging of housing stock. We also are more susceptible to the risks of increased regulations and legal and other regulatory actions that are targeted at consumer credit, the specific consumer credit products that our Bank Partners offer (including promotional financing), real estate and home improvements. Our business concentration could have an adverse effect on our business.
We are,As part of our elective healthcare vertical we face some factors that differ from our home improvement vertical, and intend in the future to continue, expanding into newunique considerations of this industry verticals, including elective healthcare,vertical, and our failure to comply with applicable regulations, or accurately predictforecast demand or growth in those new industries could have an adverse effect on our business.
We recently expanded into theOur elective healthcare industry vertical which involves consumer financing for elective medical procedures and products. Elective healthcare providers include doctors’ and dentists’ offices, outpatient surgery centers and clinics providinglicensed providers of general dentistry, orthodontics, cosmetic and aestheticimplant dentistry, vision correction, bariatric surgery,non-invasive cosmetic surgery,services, hair replacement, reproductive medicine, veterinary medicine and hearing aid devices.regenerative medicine. We make no assurance that we willmay not achieve similar levels of success, if any, in this industry vertical, or thatand we will notmay face unanticipated challenges in our ability to offer our program in this industry vertical. In addition, the elective healthcare industry vertical is highly regulated, and we, our merchants and our Bank Partners as applicable, will beare subject to significant additional regulatory requirements, including various healthcare and privacy laws. We have limited experience in managing these risks and the compliance requirements attendant to these additional regulatory requirements. See “-Risks“–Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment-TheEnvironment–The increased scrutiny of third-party medical financing by governmental agencies may lead to increased regulatory burdens and adversely affect our consolidated revenue or results of operations.” The costs of compliance and any failure by us, our merchants or our Bank Partners, as applicable, to comply with such regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may in the future expand into new industry verticals, and our failure to mitigate specific regulatory, credit, and other risks associated with a new industry vertical could have an adverse effect on our business.
We may in the future further expand into other industry verticals. There is no assurance that we willWe may not be able to successfully develop consumer financing products and services for these new industries. Our investment of resources to develop consumer financing products and services for the new industries we enter may either be insufficient or result in expenses that are excessive in lightrelative to the number of loans actually originated by our Bank Partners in those industries. Additionally, industry participants, including our merchants, their customers and our Bank Partners, may not be receptive to our solution in these new industries. The borrower profile of consumers in new verticals may not be as attractive, in terms of average FICO scores or other attributes, as in our current verticals, which may lead to higher levels of delinquencies or defaults than we have historically experienced. Industries change rapidly, and we make no assurance that we willmay not be able to accurately forecast demand (or the lack thereof) for our solution or that those industries willmay not grow. Failure to predictforecast demand or growth accurately in new industries could have a materiallymaterial adverse impact on our business.
Our business would suffer if we fail to attract and retain highly skilled employees.
Our future success will depend on our ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly information technology and sales. Trained and experienced personnel are in high demand and may be in short supply. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we do and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors that may seek to recruit them. We may not be able to attract, develop and maintain the skilled workforce necessary to operate our business, and labor expenses may increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of qualified personnel.
The Amended Credit Agreement that governs our term loan and revolving loan facility contains various covenants that could limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our best long-term interests.
We have a term loan and revolving loan facility that we may draw on to finance our operations and for other corporate purposes. The Amended Credit Agreement contains operating covenants, including customary limitations on the incurrence of certain indebtedness and liens, restrictions on certain intercompany transactions and limitations on dividends and stock repurchases. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, and breaches of these covenants could result in a default under the Amended Credit Agreement and any future financial agreements into which we may enter. If we default on our credit obligations, our lenders may require repayment of any outstanding debt and terminate the Amended Credit Agreement.
If any of these events occurs, our ability to fund our operations could be seriously harmed. If not waived, defaults could cause any outstanding indebtedness under our Amended Credit Agreement and any future financing agreements that we may enter into to become immediately due and payable.
For more information on our term loan and revolving loan facility, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-LiquidityOperations–Liquidity and Capital Resources-Term loanResources–Borrowings” and revolving loan facility” and Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
We may be unable to sufficiently protect our proprietary rights and may encounter disputes from time to time relating to our use of the intellectual property of third parties.
We rely on a combination of trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and agreements with employees and third parties to protect our proprietary rights. In 2014, we submitted a patent application relating to our mobile application process and credit decisioning model, which application is currently pending. There is no assuranceThe Warehouse Facility contains various covenants that our patent application will be granted. We have trademark and service mark registrations and pending applications for additional registrations in the United States. We also own the domain name rights for greensky.com, as well as other words and phrases important to our business. Nonetheless, third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent our intellectual property, and our intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide us with a competitive advantage.
Despite our efforts to protect these rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of our technology and processes. Our competitors and other third parties independently may design around or develop similar technology or otherwise duplicate our services or products such that we could not assert our intellectual property rights against them. In addition, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our intellectual property and confidential and proprietary information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. Measures in place may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property or proprietary information and the resulting loss of competitive advantage, and we may be required to litigate to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information from misappropriation or infringement by others, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful.
We also may encounter disputes from time to time concerning intellectual property rights of others, and we may not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise claims against us alleging that we, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by us, infringe on their intellectual property rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for us to conduct our operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged violations of such intellectual property rights. Given the complex, rapidly
changing and competitive technological and business environment in which we operate, and the potential risks and uncertainties of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against us may cause us to spend significant amounts to defend the claim, even if we ultimately prevail, pay significant money damages, lose significant revenues, be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property (temporarily or permanently), cease offering certain products or services, or incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.
Moreover, it has become common in recent years for individuals and groups to purchase intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as ours. Even in instances where we believe that claims and allegations of intellectual property infringement against us are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of time and attention of our management and employees. In addition, although in some cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify us for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse or be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. In other cases, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to pay monetary damages, which may be significant.
Our risk management processes and procedures may not be effective.
Our risk management processes and procedures seek to appropriately balance risk and return and mitigate our risks. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and control the types of risk to which we and our Bank Partners are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk and operational risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss that arises when an obligor fails to meet the terms of an obligation. While our exposure to the direct economic cost of consumer credit risk is limited because, with the exception of R&D Receivables and other loans for which we purchase the receivables, we do not hold the loans or the receivables underlying the loans that our Bank Partners originate, we are exposed to consumer credit risk in the form of both our FCR liability and our limited escrow requirement, as well aslimit our ability to maintain relationships with our existing Bank Partners and recruit new bank partners. Market risk is the risk of loss due to changesengage in external market factors such as interest rates. Liquidity risk is the riskactivities that financial condition or overall safety and soundness are adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet obligations and support business growth. Strategic risk is the risk from changes in the business environment, improper implementation of decisions or inadequate responsiveness to changes in the business environment. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed processes, people or systems, external events (e.g., natural disasters), compliance, reputational or legal matters and includes those risks as they relate directly to us as well as to third parties with whom we contract or otherwise do business.
Management of our risks depends, in part, upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. If these models are ineffective at predicting future losses or are otherwise inadequate, we may incur unexpected losses or otherwise be adversely affected. In addition, the information we use in managing our credit and other risks may be inaccurate or incomplete as a result of error or fraud, both of which may be difficult to detect and avoid. There also may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated, including when processes are changed or new products and services are introduced. If our risk management framework does not effectively identify and control our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses or be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.best long-term interests.
Some aspects of our platform include open source software, and any failureOur ability to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affectthe Warehouse Facility may be affected by events beyond our business.
Aspects of our platform include software covered by open source licenses. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by United States courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our platform. If portions of our proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affected portions of our source code, re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our technologies and loan products.control. In addition, the assets of the Warehouse SPV are owned by the Warehouse SPV and are solely available to risks relatedsatisfy creditors of the Warehouse SPV. As such, the Warehouse SPV assets are not available to license requirements, usagesatisfy obligations of open source software can lead to greater risks than useGreenSky, Inc., GS Holdings, GreenSky LLC or other subsidiaries of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties orthe Company.
controlsFor more information on the originWarehouse Facility, see Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations–Liquidity and Capital Resources–Borrowings” and Note 7 to the software. Many ofConsolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
We may incur losses on interest rate swap and hedging arrangements.
We may periodically enter into agreements to reduce the risks associated with increases in interest rates, such as our June 2019 interest rate swap agreement. Although these agreements may partially protect against rising interest rates, they also may reduce the usebenefits to us if interest rates decline. Also, nonperformance by the other party to the arrangement may subject us to increased credit risks. For additional information regarding our June 2019 interest rate swap agreement, see Note 3 and Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
To the extent that we seek to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, we may not be able to do so effectively.
We may in the future seek to grow our business by exploring potential acquisitions or other strategic investments or alliances. We may not be successful in identifying businesses or opportunities that meet our acquisition or expansion criteria. In addition, even if a potential acquisition target or other strategic investment is identified, we may not be successful in completing such acquisition or integrating such new business or other investment. We may face significant competition for acquisition and other strategic investment opportunities from other well-capitalized companies, many of which have greater financial resources and greater access to debt and equity capital to secure and complete acquisitions or other strategic investments, than we do. As a result of such competition, we may be unable to acquire certain assets or businesses, or take advantage of other strategic investment opportunities that we deem attractive; the purchase price for a given strategic opportunity may be significantly elevated; or certain other terms or circumstances may be substantially more onerous. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate any such acquisition, or other strategic investment, opportunity could impede our growth.
We may not be able to manage our expanding operations effectively or continue to grow, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses. Furthermore, we may be responsible for any legacy liabilities of businesses we acquire or be subject to additional liability in connection with other strategic investments. The existence or amount of these liabilities may not be known at the time of acquisition, or other strategic investment, and may have a material adverse effect on our business.
The effect of comprehensive U.S. tax reform legislation or challenges to our tax positions could adversely affect our business.
We operate in multiple jurisdictionsLegal and are subject to tax laws and regulations of the United States federal, state and local governments. United States federal, state and local tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to varying interpretations. There is no assurance that our tax positions will not be successfully challenged by relevant tax authorities.
In addition, on December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) (the “Tax Act”). Among a number of significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax rules, the Tax Act reduces the marginal U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, limits the deduction for net interest expense, and shifts the United States toward a more territorial tax system. While our analysis of the Tax Act’s impact on our cash tax liability and financial condition has not identified any overall material adverse effect, we are still evaluating the effects of the Tax Act on us and there are a number of uncertainties and ambiguities as to the interpretation and application of many of the provisions in the Tax Act. In the absence of guidance on these issues, we will use what we believe are reasonable interpretations and assumptions in interpreting and applying the Tax Act for purposes of determining our cash tax liabilities and results of operations, which may change as we receive additional clarification and implementation guidance and as the interpretation of the Tax Act evolves over time. It is possible that the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could issue subsequent guidance or take positions on audit that differ from the interpretations and assumptions that we previously made, which could have a material adverse effect on our cash tax liabilities, results of operations and financial condition, or an indirect effect on our business through its impact on our Bank Partners, merchants and consumers. You are urged to consult your tax adviser regarding the implications of the Tax Act.
Future changes in financial accounting standards may significantly change our reported results of operations.
GAAP is subject to standard setting or interpretation by the FASB, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.
Additionally, our assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. GAAP and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, including revenue recognition, FCRs, and share-based compensation are highly complex and involve subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by us. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us (i) could require us to make changes to our accounting systems that could increase our operating costs and (ii) could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.
Risks Related to Our Regulatory EnvironmentRisks
We are subject to federal and state consumer protection laws.
In connection with our administration of the GreenSky program, we must comply with various regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer credit transactions, various aspects of which are untested as applied to our business model. The laws to which we are or may be subject include:
•state laws and regulations that impose requirements related to loan disclosures and terms, credit discrimination, credit reporting, money transmission, debt servicing and collection and unfair or deceptive business practices;
•the Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder, and similar state laws, which require certain disclosures to borrowers regarding the terms and conditions of their loans and credit transactions;
•Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, and Section 1031 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (“UDAAP”) in connection with any consumer financial product or service;
•the ECOA and Regulation B promulgated thereunder, which prohibit creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, marital status, the fact that all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act or any applicable state law;
•the Fair Credit Reporting Act (the “FCRA”), as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, which promotes the accuracy, fairness and privacy of information in the files of consumer reporting agencies;
•the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, as well as state debt collection laws, all of which provide guidelines and limitations concerning the conduct of third-party debt collectors in connection with the collection of consumer debts;
•the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the “GLBA”), which includes limitations on disclosure of nonpublic personal information by financial institutions about a consumer to nonaffiliated third parties, in certain circumstances requires financial institutions to limit the use and further disclosure of nonpublic personal information by nonaffiliated third parties to whom they disclose such information and requires financial
institutions to disclose certain privacy policies and practices with respect to information sharing with affiliated and nonaffiliated entities as well as to safeguard personal customer information, and other privacy laws and regulations;
•the Bankruptcy Code, which limits the extent to which creditors may seek to enforce debts against parties who have filed for bankruptcy protection;
•the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (the “SCRA”), which allows active duty military members to suspend or postpone certain civil obligations so that the military member can devote his or her full attention to military duties;
•the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which provide disclosure requirements, guidelines and restrictions on the electronic transfer of funds from consumers’ bank accounts;
•the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act and similar state laws, particularly the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which authorize the creation of legally binding and enforceable agreements utilizing electronic records and signatures; and
•the Bank Secrecy Act, which relates to compliance with anti-money laundering, customer due diligence and record-keeping policies and procedures.
While we have developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance is given that our compliance policies and procedures willmay not be effective. Failure to comply with these laws and with regulatory requirements applicable to our business could subject us to damages, revocation of licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm our business.
Our industry is highly regulated and is undergoing regulatory transformation, which has created inherent uncertainty. Changing federal, state and local laws, as well as changing regulatory enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact our business.
In connection with our administration of the GreenSky program, we are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination under United States federal and state laws and regulations. We are required to comply with numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that regulate, among other things, the manner in which we administer the GreenSky program, the terms of the loans that our Bank Partners originate and the fees that we may charge. A material or continued failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could subject us to lawsuits or governmental actions and/or damage our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business. Regulators, including the CFPB, have broad discretion with respect to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of these laws and regulations, including through enforcement actions that could subject us to civil money penalties, customer remediations, increased compliance costs, and limits or prohibitions on our ability to offer certain products and services or to engage in certain activities. In addition, to the extent that we undertake actions requiring regulatory approval or non-objection, regulators may make their approval or non-objection subject to conditions or restrictions that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, some of our competitors are subject to different, and in some cases less restrictive, legislative and regulatory regimes, which may have the effect of providing them with a competitive advantage over us.
Additionally, federal, state and local governments and regulatory agencies have proposed or enacted numerous new laws, regulations and rules related to personal loans. Federal and state regulators also are enforcing existing laws, regulations and rules more aggressively and enhancing their supervisory expectations regarding the management of legal and regulatory compliance risks. Consumer finance regulation is constantly changing, and new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could have a materially adverse impact on our ability to operate as we currently intend.
These regulatory changes and uncertainties make our business planning more difficult and could result in changes to our business model and potentially adversely impact our results of operations. New laws or regulations also require us to incur significant expenses to ensure compliance. As compared to our competitors, we could be subject to more stringent state or local regulations or could incur marginally greater compliance costs as a result of regulatory changes. In addition, our failure to comply (or to ensure that our agents and third-party service providers comply) with these laws or regulations may result in costly litigation or enforcement actions, the penalties for which could
include: revocation of licenses; fines and other monetary penalties; civil and criminal liability; substantially reduced payments by borrowers; modification of the original terms of loans, permanent forgiveness of debt, or inability to, directly or indirectly, collect all or a part of the principal of or interest on loans; and increased purchases of receivables underlying loans originated by our Bank Partners and indemnification claims.
Proposals to change the statutes affecting financial services companies are frequently introduced in Congress and state legislatures that, if enacted, may affect our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. In addition, numerous federal and state regulators have the authority to promulgate or change regulations that could have a similar effect on our operating environment. We cannot determine with any degree of certainty whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the ultimate impact that any such potential legislation or implementing regulations, or any such potential regulatory actions by federal or state regulators, would have upon our business.
With respect to state regulation, although we seek to comply with applicable state loan, loan broker, loan originator, servicing, debt collection, money transmitter and similar statutes in all U.S. jurisdictions, and with licensing and other requirements that we believe may be applicable to us, if we are found to not have complied with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or penalties or be required to obtain a license in one or more such jurisdictions, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to make the GreenSky program available to borrowers in particular states and, thus, adversely impact our business.
We also are subject to potential enforcement and other actions that may be brought by state attorneys general or other state enforcement authorities and other governmental agencies. Any such actions could subject us to civil money penalties and fines, customer remediations and increased compliance costs, as well as damage our reputation and brand and limit or prohibit our ability to offer certain products and services or engage in certain business practices.
New laws, regulations, policy or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business, or our reexamination of our current practices, could adversely impact our profitability, limit our ability to continue existing or pursue new business activities, require us to change certain of our business practices or alter our relationships with GreenSky program customers, affect retention of our key personnel, or expose us to additional costs (including increased compliance costs and/or customer remediation). These changes also may require us to invest significant resources, and devote significant management attention, to make any necessary changes and could adversely affect our business.
The highly regulated environment in which our Bank Partners operate could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our Bank Partners are subject to federal and state supervision and regulation. Federal regulation of the banking industry, along with tax and accounting laws, regulations, rules and standards, may limit their operations significantly and control the methods by which they conduct business. In addition, compliance with laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations can impose additional compliance requirements. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act imposes significant regulatory and compliance changes on financial institutions. Regulatory requirements affect our Bank Partners’ lending practices and investment practices, among other aspects of their businesses, and restrict transactions between us and our Bank Partners. These requirements may constrain the operations of our Bank Partners, and the adoption of new laws and changes to, or repeal of, existing laws may have a further impact on our business.
In choosing whether and how to conduct business with us, current and prospective Bank Partners can be expected to take into account the legal, regulatory and supervisory regime that applies to them, including potential changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory standards, licensing requirements or supervisory expectations. Regulators may elect to alter standards or the interpretation of the standards used to measure regulatory compliance or to determine the adequacy of liquidity, certain risk management or other operational practices for financial services companies in a manner that impacts our Bank Partners. Furthermore, the regulatory agencies have extremely broad discretion in their interpretation of the regulations and laws and their interpretation of the quality of our Bank Partners’ loan portfolios and other assets. If any regulatory agency’s assessment of the quality of our Bank Partners’ assets, operations, lending practices, investment practices or other aspects of their business changes, it
may materially reduce our Bank Partners’ earnings, capital ratios and share price in such a way that affects our business.
Bank holding companies and financial institutions are extensively regulated and currently face an uncertain regulatory environment. Applicable state and federal laws, regulations, interpretations, including licensing laws and regulations, enforcement policies and accounting principles have been subject to significant changes in recent years, and may be subject to significant future changes. We cannot predict with any degree of certaintydo not know the substance or effect of pending or future legislation or regulation or the application of laws and regulations to our Bank Partners. Future changes may have a material adverse effect on our Bank Partners and, therefore, on us.
We are subject to regulatory examinations and investigations and may incur fines, penalties and increased costs that could negatively impact our business.
Federal and state agencies have broad enforcement powers over us, including powers to investigate our business practices and broad discretion to deem particular practices unfair, deceptive, abusive or otherwise not in accordance with the law. The continued focus of regulators on the consumer financial services industry has resulted, and could continue to result, in new enforcement actions that could, directly or indirectly, affect the manner in which we conduct our business and increase the costs of defending and settling any such matters, which could negatively impact our business. In some cases, regardless of fault, it may be less time-consuming or costly to settle these matters, which may require us to implement certain changes to our business practices, provide remediation to certain individuals or make a settlement payment to a given party or regulatory body. We have in the past chosen to settle certain matters in order to avoid the time and expense of contesting them. There is no assurance that any futureFuture settlements will notcould have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, the laws and regulations applicable to us are subject to administrative or judicial interpretation. Some of these laws and regulations have been enacted only recently and may not yet have been interpreted or may be interpreted infrequently. As a result of infrequent or sparse interpretations, ambiguities in these laws and regulations may create uncertainty with respect to what type of conduct is permitted or restricted under such laws and regulations. Any ambiguity under a law or regulation to which we are subject may lead to regulatory investigations, governmental enforcement actions and private causes of action, such as class action lawsuits, with respect to our compliance with such laws or regulations.
The CFPB is a relatively new agency, and there continues to be uncertainty as to how its actions will impact our business; the agency’s actions have had, and may continue to have, an adverse impact on our business.
The CFPB has broad authority over the businesses in which we engage. The CFPB is authorized to prevent “unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices” through its regulatory, supervisory and enforcement authority and to remediate violations of numerous consumer protection laws in a variety of ways, including collecting civil money penalties and fines and providing for customer restitution. The CFPB is charged, in part, with enforcing certain federal laws involving consumer financial products and services and is empowered with examination, enforcement and rulemakingrule-making authority. The CFPB has taken an active role in regulating lending markets. For example, the CFPB sends examiners to banks and other financial institutions that service and/or originate consumer loans to determine compliance with applicable federal consumer financial laws and to assess whether consumers’ interests are protected. In addition, the CFPB maintains an online complaint system that allows consumers to log complaints with respect to various consumer finance products, including those included in the GreenSky program.
There continues to be uncertainty as to how the CFPB’s strategies and priorities will impact our business and our results of operations going forward. Actions by the CFPB could result in requirements to alter or cease offering affected products and services, making them less attractive or restricting our ability to offer them. Although we have committed significant resources to enhancing our compliance programs, changes by the CFPB in regulatory expectations, interpretations or practices could increase the risk of additional enforcement actions, fines and penalties.
In March 2015, the CFPB issued a report scrutinizing pre-dispute arbitration clauses and, in May 2016, it published a proposed rule that would substantially curtail our ability to enter into voluntary pre-dispute arbitration clauses with consumers. In July 2017, the CFPB issued a final rule banning bars on class action arbitration (but not arbitration
generally). Pre-dispute arbitration clauses currently are contained in all of the loan agreements processed through the GreenSky program. The new rule was subsequently challenged in Congress and, on November 1, 2017, President Trump approved a resolution repealing the rule. In the future, if a similar rule were to become effective, we expect that our exposure to class action arbitration would increase significantly, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
On January 16, 2018, aOctober 5, 2017, the CFPB rulereleased its “Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Lending Rule,” commonly referred to as the “Payday Loan Rule” became effective. Most ofRule.” On July 7, 2020, the substantiveCFPB released a new final rule that revoked the underwriting provisions of the rule requirePayday Loan Rule but retained and ratified the payment provisions. The Community Financial Services Association of America sued the CFPB in April 2018 over the Payday Loan Rule. The compliance by August 19, 2019. Resolutions are pendingdate of the Payday Loan Rule has been stayed in Congress to cancelconnection with this litigation. Most recently, the rule throughU.S. Court of Appeals for the Congressional Review Act.Fifth Circuit stayed the compliance date in October 2021. While the rulePayday Loan Rule does not appear to be targeted at businesses like ours, some of its provisions are broad and potentially could be triggered by the promotional loans that our Bank Partners extend that require increases in payments at specified points in time. We are continuing to
review monitor developments associated with the implicationsPayday Loan Rule and are working toward compliance with the Payday Loan Rule requirements ahead of the rule. We currently believe that the promotional loan products can be structured in a manner that does not implicate the rule in any meaningful respect, but we have not yet finalized any plans for responding to the rule.ultimate compliance date.
Future actions by the CFPB (or other regulators) against us or our competitors that discourage the use of our or their services could result in reputational harm and adversely affect our business. If the CFPB changes regulations that were adopted in the past by other regulators and transferred to the CFPB by the Dodd-Frank Act, or modifies through supervision or enforcement past regulatory guidance or interprets existing regulations in a different or stricter manner than they have been interpreted in the past by us, the industry or other regulators, our compliance costs and litigation exposure could increase materially. If future regulatory or legislative restrictions or prohibitions are imposed that affect our ability to offer promotional financing for certain of our products or that require us to make significant changes to our business practices, and if we are unable to develop compliant alternatives with acceptable returns, these restrictions or prohibitions could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The Dodd-Frank Act generally permits state officials to enforce regulations issued by the CFPB and to enforce its general prohibition against unfair, deceptive or abusive practices. This could make it more difficult than in the past for federal financial regulators to declare state laws that differ from federal standards to be preempted. To the extent that states enact requirements that differ from federal standards or state officials and courts adopt interpretations of federal consumer laws that differ from those adopted by the CFPB, we may be required to alter or cease offering products or services in some jurisdictions, which would increase compliance costs and reduce our ability to offer the same products and services to consumers nationwide, and we may be subject to a higher risk of state enforcement actions.
The contours of the Dodd-Frank UDAAP standard are still uncertain and there is a risk that certain features of the GreenSky program loans could be deemed to violate the UDAAP standard.
The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices and authorizes the CFPB to enforce that prohibition. The CFPB has filed a large number of UDAAP enforcement actions against consumer lenders for practices that do not appear to violate other consumer finance statutes. There is a risk that the CFPB could determine that certain features of the GreenSky program loans are unfair, deceptive or abusive. The CFPB has filed actions alleging that deferred interest programs can be unfair, deceptive or abusive if lenders do not adequately disclose the terms of the deferred interest loans.
On June 2, 2016,Our vendor relationships subject us to a variety of risks, and the CFPB issued proposed rulesfailure of third parties to comply with legal or regulatory requirements or to provide various services that would impose numerous restrictionsare important to our operations could have an adverse effect on certain “high-cost installment loans.” It is not clear if or when the CFPB will publish the final version of these rules, or what their content will be. Amongour business.
We have significant vendors that, among other things, provide us with financial, technology and other services to support our loan servicing and other activities, including, for example, credit ratings and reporting, cloud-based data storage and other IT solutions, and payment processing. The CFPB has issued guidance stating that institutions under its supervision may be held responsible for the proposed rules would impose various obligations to determine a consumer’s ability to repay a consumer loan. It is possible that the final rules, if enacted, could impact the GreenSky program. It is also possible that, depending on the formactions of the final rules, changes wouldcompanies with which they contract. Accordingly, we could be necessaryadversely impacted to the GreenSky program, which changesextent our vendors fail to comply with the legal requirements applicable to the particular products or services being offered.
In some cases, third-party vendors are the sole source, or one of a limited number of sources, of the services they provide to us. Most of our vendor agreements are terminable on little or no notice, and if our current vendors were to stop providing services to us on acceptable terms, we may be unable to procure alternatives from other vendors in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms (or at all). If any third-party vendor fails to provide the services we require, fails to meet contractual requirements (including compliance with applicable laws and regulations), fails to maintain adequate data privacy and electronic security systems, or suffers a cyber-attack or other security breach, we could be subject to CFPB, FTC and other regulatory enforcement actions and suffer economic and reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, we may incur significant costs to resolve any such disruptions in service, which could adversely affect our business.
Litigation, regulatory actions and compliance issues could subject us to significant fines, penalties, judgments, remediation costs and/or requirements resulting in increased expenses.
Our business is subject to increased risks of litigation and regulatory actions as a result of a number of factors and from various sources, including as a result of the revenuehighly regulated nature of the financial services industry and the focus of state and federal enforcement agencies on the financial services industry.
In the ordinary course of business, we have been named as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation. Generally, this litigation arises from the dissatisfaction of a consumer with the products or services of a merchant; some of this litigation, however, has arisen from other matters, including claims of discrimination, credit reporting and collection practices. Certain of those actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. From time to time, we also are involved in, or the subject of, reviews, requests for information, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by state and federal governmental agencies, including banking regulators and the CFPB, regarding our business activities and our qualifications to conduct our business in certain jurisdictions, which could subject us to significant fines, penalties, obligations to change our business practices and other requirements resulting in increased expenses and diminished earnings. Our involvement in any such matter also could cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the operation of our business, even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor. We have in the past chosen to settle (and may in the future choose to settle) certain matters in order to avoid the time and expense of contesting them. Although none of the settlements has been material to our business, in the future, such settlements could have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, any settlement, or any consent order or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by a government agency, may prompt litigation or additional investigations or proceedings as other litigants or other government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities.
In addition, a number of participants in the consumer finance industry have been the subject of putative class action lawsuits; state attorney general actions and other state regulatory actions; federal regulatory enforcement actions, including actions relating to alleged unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices; violations of state licensing and lending laws, including state usury laws; actions alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or other prohibited bases; and allegations of noncompliance with various state and federal laws and regulations relating to originating and servicing consumer finance loans. The current regulatory environment, increased regulatory compliance efforts and enhanced regulatory enforcement have resulted in significant operational and compliance costs and may prevent us from providing certain products and services. These regulatory matters or other factors could, in the future, affect how we conduct our business and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, legal proceedings brought under state consumer protection statutes or under several of the various federal consumer financial services statutes subject to the jurisdiction of the CFPB may result in a separate fine for each violation of the statute, which, particularly in the case of class action lawsuits, could result in damages substantially in excess of the amounts we earned from the underlying activities.
We contest our liability and the amount of damages, as appropriate, in each pending matter. The outcome of pending and future matters could be material to our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and could materially adversely affect our business.
In addition, from time to time, through our operational and compliance controls, we identify compliance issues that require us to make operational changes and, depending on the nature of the issue, result in financial remediation to
impacted customers. These self-identified issues and voluntary remediation payments could be significant, depending on the issue and the number of customers impacted, and also could generate litigation or regulatory investigations that subject us to additional risk. See “–Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment.”
Regulatory agencies and consumer advocacy groups are becoming more aggressive in asserting “disparate impact” claims.
Antidiscrimination statutes, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (the “ECOA”), prohibit creditors from discriminating against loan applicants and borrowers based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion and national origin. Various federal regulatory agencies and departments, including the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and CFPB, take the position that these laws prohibit not only intentional discrimination, but also neutral practices that have a “disparate impact” on a group and that are not justified by a business necessity.
These regulatory agencies, as well as consumer advocacy groups and plaintiffs’ attorneys, are focusing greater attention on “disparate impact” claims. To the extent that the “disparate impact” theory continues to apply, we derive from certain loans mademay face significant administrative burdens in attempting to identify and eliminate neutral practices that do have “disparate impact.” The ability to identify and eliminate neutral practices that have “disparate impact” is complicated by the fact that often it is our Bank Partners, including transaction fee revenue,merchants, over which we have limited control, that implement our practices. In addition, we face the risk that one or more of the variables included in particular.the GreenSky program’s loan decisioning model may be invalidated under the disparate impact test, which would require us to revise the loan decisioning model in a manner that might generate lower approval rates or higher credit losses.
In addition to reputational harm, violations of the ECOA can result in actual damages, punitive damages, injunctive or equitable relief, attorneys’ fees and civil money penalties.
Our use of third-party vendors and our other ongoing third-party business relationships are subject to increasing regulatory requirements and attention.
We regularly use third-party vendors and subcontractors as part of our business. We also depend on our substantial ongoing business relationships with our Bank Partners, merchants and other third parties. These types of third-party relationships, particularly with our Bank Partners and other funding sources, are subject to increasingly demanding regulatory requirements and oversight by federal bank regulators (such as the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) and the CFPB. The CFPB has enforcement authority with respect to the conduct of third parties that provide services to financial institutions. The CFPB has made it clear that it expects non-bank entities to maintain an effective process for managing risks associated with third-party vendor relationships, including compliance-related risks. In connection with this vendor risk management process, we are expected to perform due diligence reviews of potential vendors, review their policies and procedures and internal training materials to confirm compliance-related focus, include enforceable consequences in contracts with vendors regarding failure to comply with consumer protection requirements, and take prompt action, including terminating the relationship, in the event that vendors fail to meet our expectations.
In certain cases, we may be required to renegotiate our agreements with our vendors and/or our subcontractors to meet these enhanced requirements, which could increase the costs of operating our business. It is expected that regulators will hold us responsible for deficiencies in our oversight and control of third-party relationships and in the performance of the parties with which we have these relationships. As a result, if our regulators conclude that we have not exercised adequate oversight and control over third-party vendors and subcontractors or other ongoing third-party business relationships or that such third parties have not performed appropriately, we could be subject to enforcement actions, including civil money penalties or other administrative or judicial penalties or fines, as well as requirements for customer remediation.
Regulations relatingWe are subject to numerous laws and regulations related to privacy, information security and data protection and information security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our business, and changes in such regulations or laws could increase our costs, affect or limit how we collect and use personal information and adversely affect our business opportunities.opportunities, marketing, market research or advertising practices.
WeSubject to compliance with federal and state laws governing such collections, one of our subsidiary entities collects personally identifiable information and other data about consumers and prospective consumers who are also
applying to participate in the GreenSky program. That subsidiary uses this information to provide services to the consumers; to support, expand and improve our business; and, subject to each consumer’s or prospective consumer’s right to decline or opt out, to market products and services to them. That subsidiary also may share consumers’ personally identifiable information with certain third parties as authorized by the consumers or as described in that subsidiary's privacy policy.
The U.S. federal and various state governments have adopted or proposed law, guidelines or rules for the collection, distribution and storage of information collected from or about consumers. The FTC and various U.S. state and local governments and agencies regularly use their authority under laws prohibiting unfair or deceptive marketing and trade practices to investigate and penalize companies for practices related to the collection, use, handling, disclosure, dissemination and security of personal data of consumers. Such laws and regulations apply broadly to the collection, use, storage, export, disclosure and security of personal information that identifies or may be used to identify an individual, such as names, contact information and, in some jurisdictions, certain unique identifiers. Furthermore, such laws and regulations are subject to various privacy, information securityfrequent revisions and data protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach notification,differing interpretations and we could be negatively impacted by them. For example, ingenerally have become more stringent over time.
In connection with our administration of the GreenSky program, we are subject to the GLBA and implementing regulations and guidance. Among other things, the GLBA (i) imposes certain limitations on thefinancial institutions' ability to share their consumers’ nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third parties and (ii) requires certain disclosures to consumers about theirthe institutions' information collection, sharing and security practices and theirthe consumers' right to “opt out” of the institution’s disclosure of their personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions).
Furthermore, legislators and/The California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) became effective on January 1, 2020. The CCPA requires, among other things, covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers and afford such consumers with expanded protections and control over the collection, maintenance, use and sharing of personal information. The CCPA continues to be subject to new regulations and legislative amendments. Although we have implemented a compliance program designed to address obligations under the CCPA, it remains unclear what future modifications will be made or regulators are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information securityhow the CCPA will be interpreted in the future. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action for data protectionbreaches.
In addition, the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (the "CPRA") ballot initiative was approved by California voters on November 3, 2020. The CPRA established the California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the CCPA and CPRA. We anticipate that the CPRA and certain regulations promulgated by the California Privacy Protection Agency will apply to our business and we will work to ensure our compliance with such laws that potentiallyand regulations by their effective dates.
These laws and regulations could have a significant impact on our current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices; our current and planned collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and/or employee information; and some of our current or planned business activities. This also could increase our costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives.
Compliance with current or future privacy, data protection and information security laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting customerconsumer and/or employee data to which we are subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict our ability to provide certain products and services (such as products or services that involve us sharing information with third parties or storing sensitive credit card information), which could materially and adversely affect our profitability. Privacy requirements, including notice and opt out requirements, under the GLBA and FCRA are enforced by the FTC and by the CFPB through UDAAP and are a standard component of CFPB examinations. State entities also may initiate actions for alleged violations of privacy or security requirements under state law.
Our failure to comply with privacy, data protection and information security laws could result in potentially significant regulatory investigations and government actions, litigation,actions; litigation; fines or sanctions,sanctions; consumer, Bank Partner or merchant actions and damage to our reputation and brand,brand; all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If any third parties with whom we work, such as marketing partners and vendors, violate applicable laws or our policies, such violations may put our consumers’ information at risk and could harm our business.
Future non-compliance with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”) may subject us to fines, penalties and civil liability and may result in the loss of our ability to acceptsettle on credit and debit card payments.networks.
We settle and fund transactions on a national credit card network and, thus, are subject to payment card association operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers, including PCI DSS, a security standard applicable to companies that collect, store or transmit certain data regarding credit and debit cards, holders and transactions. We
Although we are currently are not, and in the future may not be, compliantcompliance with PCI DSS, and are taking steps to achievewe may not remain in compliance with such compliance. No assurance is given that we will be successfulstandards in that regard.
the future. Any failure to comply fully or materially with PCI DSS now or at any point in the future (i) may violate payment card association operating rules, federal and state laws and regulations, and the terms of certain of our contracts with third parties, (ii) may subject us to fines, penalties, damages and civil liability, and (iii) may result in the loss of our ability to accept credit card payments. Even if we achieveremain in compliance with PCI DSS, we still may not be able to prevent security breaches involving customer transaction data. In addition, there is no assurance that advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments will notcould result in a compromise or breach of the processes that we use to protect customer data. If any such compromise or breach were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
The increased scrutiny of third-party medical financing by governmental agencies may lead to increased regulatory burdens and may adversely affect our business.
We operate in the elective healthcare industry vertical, which includes consumer financing for elective medical procedures. Recently, regulators have increased scrutiny of third-party providers of financing for medical procedures that are generally not covered by health insurance. In addition, the CFPB and attorneys general in New York and Minnesota have conducted investigations of alleged abusive lending practices or exploitation regarding third-party medical financing services.
If, in the future, any of our practices in this space were found to be deficient, it could result in fines, penalties or increased regulatory burdens. Additionally, any regulatory inquiry could damage our reputation and limit our ability to conduct operations, which could adversely affect our business. Moreover, the adoption of any law, rule or regulation affecting the industry may also increase our administrative costs, require us to modify our practices to comply with applicable regulations or reduce our ability to participate competitively, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In recent years, federal regulators and the United States DOJ have increased their focus on enforcing the SCRA against servicers. Similarly, state legislatures have taken steps to strengthen their own state-specific versions of the SCRA.
The DOJ and federal regulators have entered into significant settlements with a number of loan servicers alleging violations of the SCRA. Some of the settlements have alleged that the servicers did not correctly apply the SCRA’s 6% interest rate cap, while other settlements have alleged, without limitation, that servicers did not comply with the SCRA’s default judgment protections when seeking to collect payment of a debt. Recent settlements indicate that the DOJ and federal regulators broadly interpret the scope of the substantive protections under the SCRA and are moving aggressively to identify instances in which loan servicers have not complied with the SCRA. Recent SCRA-related settlements continue to make this a significant area of scrutiny for both regulatory examinations and public enforcement actions.
In addition, most state legislatures have their own versions of the SCRA. In most instances, these laws extend some or all of the substantive benefits of the federal SCRA to members of the state National Guard who are in state service, but certain states also provide greater substantive protections to National Guard members or individuals who are in federal military service. In recent years, certain states have revised their laws to increase the potential benefits to individuals, and these changes pose additional compliance burdens on our Bank Partners and us as we seek to comply with both the federal and relevant state versions of the SCRA.
No assurance is given that ourOur efforts and those of our Bank Partners to comply with the SCRA willmay not be effective, and our failure to comply could subject us to liability, damages and reputational harm, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws could have significant adverse consequences for us.
We maintain an enterprise-wide program designed to enable us to comply with all applicable anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws and regulations, including the Bank Secrecy Act and the Patriot Act. This program includes policies, procedures, processes and other internal controls designed to identify, monitor, manage and mitigate the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing. These controls include procedures and processes to detect and report suspicious transactions, perform customer due diligence, respond to requests from law enforcement, and meet all recordkeeping and reporting requirements related to particular transactions involving currency or monetary instruments. No assurance is given that ourOur programs and controls willmay not be effective to ensure compliance with all applicable anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing laws and regulations, and our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us to significant sanctions, fines, penalties and reputational harm, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may be unable to sufficiently protect our proprietary rights and may encounter disputes from time to time relating to our use of the intellectual property of third parties.
We rely on a combination of trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and agreements with employees and third parties to protect our proprietary rights. On July 28, 2020, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued the Company’s first U.S. patent. Originally filed in 2014, the patent relates to our mobile application process and credit decisioning model. In 2020, we submitted additional patent applications related to our mobile application process and credit decisioning model, one of which was issued in November 2020, and we submitted a patent application related to our Universal Credit Application platform that allows participating merchants to seamlessly make available second look financing to their customers. We also have trademark and service mark registrations and pending applications for additional registrations in the United States. Further, we own the domain name rights for greensky.com, as well as other words and phrases important to our business. Nonetheless, third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent our intellectual property, and our intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide us with a competitive advantage.
Despite our efforts to protect these rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of our technology and processes. Our competitors and other third parties independently may design around or develop similar technology or otherwise duplicate our services or products such that we could not assert our intellectual property rights against them. In addition, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our intellectual property and confidential and proprietary information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. Measures in place may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property or proprietary information and the resulting loss of competitive advantage, and we may be required to litigate to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information from misappropriation or infringement by others, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful.
We also may encounter disputes from time to time concerning intellectual property rights of others, and we may not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise claims against us alleging that we, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by us, infringe on their intellectual property rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for us to conduct our operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged violations of such intellectual property rights. Given the complex, rapidly changing and competitive technological and business environment in which we operate, and the potential risks and uncertainties of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against us may cause us to spend significant amounts to defend the claim, even if we ultimately prevail, pay significant money damages, lose significant revenues, be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property (temporarily or permanently), cease offering certain products or services, or incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.
Moreover, it has become common in recent years for individuals and groups to purchase intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as ours. Even in instances where we believe that claims and allegations of intellectual property infringement against us are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion
of time and attention of our management and employees. In addition, although in some cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify us for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse or be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. In other cases, our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to pay monetary damages, which may be significant.
If we were found to be operating without having obtained necessary state or local licenses, it could adversely affect our business.
Certain states have adopted laws regulating and requiring licensing by parties that engage in certain activity regarding consumer finance transactions, including facilitating and assisting such transactions in certain
circumstances. Furthermore, certain states and localities have also adopted laws requiring licensing for consumer debt collection or servicing. While we believe we have obtained all necessary licenses, the application of some consumer finance licensing laws to the GreenSky program is unclear. If we were found to be in violation of applicable state licensing requirements by a court or a state, federal, or local enforcement agency, we could be subject to fines, damages, injunctive relief (including required modification or discontinuation of our business in certain areas), criminal penalties and other penalties or consequences, and the loans originated through the GreenSky program could be rendered void or unenforceable in whole or in part, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If loans originated through the GreenSky program are found to violate applicable state usury laws or other lending laws, it could adversely affect our business.
Because the loans originated through the GreenSky program are originated by and held by our Bank Partners, under principles of federal preemption the terms and conditions of the loans are subject only to the usury limitation in the state where the Bank Partner is based and are not subject to most other state consumer finance laws, including state licensing and usury restrictions.requirements. If a court, or a state or federal enforcement agency, were to deem GreenSky-ratherGreenSky - rather than our Bank Partners-thePartners - the “true lender” for loans originated throughany of the GreenSky program,loans, and if for this reason (or any other reason) thethose loans were deemed subject to and in violation of certain state consumer finance laws, we could be subject to fines, damages, injunctive relief (including required modification or discontinuation of our business in certain areas), and other penalties or consequences, and the loans could be rendered void or enforceableunenforceable in whole or in part, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have beenIn addition, certain litigation has challenged the ability of loan assignees to rely on the preemption that applied to the original lender. In some instances, we facilitate the sale of loan participations issued by a Bank Partner to institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources. In a participation structure, the Bank Partner retains title to the loans and the loans are not assigned to a third party. However, if a court, or a state or federal enforcement agency, were to successfully challenge the participation structure and recharacterize us or the purchaser of a participation as the “true lender” or as a loan assignee, and if for this reason (or any other reason) the loans were deemed subject to and in the past and may in the futureviolation of certain consumer finance laws, we could be subject to federal and state regulatory inquiries regarding our business.
We have, from time to time in the normal coursefines, damages, injunctive relief (including required modification or discontinuation of our business received,in certain areas), and mayother penalties or consequences, the loans could be rendered void or unenforceable in the future receivewhole or in part, and we could be subject to inquiries or investigations by state and federal regulatory agencies and bodies such as the CFPB, state attorneys general, state financial regulatory agencies, and other state or federal agencies or bodies regarding the GreenSky program, including the origination and servicing of consumer loans, practices by merchantsclaims for damages or other third parties,remedies related to breaches of certain representation and licensing and registration requirements. For example,warranties we have entered into regulatory agreements with state agencies regarding issues including merchant conduct and oversight andmake to purchasers of participations or to obligations to repurchase loan pricing and may enter into similar agreements in the future. We have also received inquiries from state regulatory agencies regarding requirementsparticipations previously sold to obtain licenses from or register with those states, including in states where we have determined that we are not required to obtain such a license or be registered with the state, and we expect to continue to receive such inquiries. Any such inquiries or investigations could involve substantial time and expense to analyze and respond to, could divert management’s attention and other resources from running our business, and could lead to public enforcement actions or lawsuits and fines, penalties, injunctive relief, and the need to obtain additional licenses that we do not currently possess. Our involvement inpurchasers, any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise and even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation, lead to additional investigations and enforcement actions from other agencies or litigants, and further divert management attention and resources from the operation of our business. As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions arising out of any state or federal inquiries we receive could be material to our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows andwhich could have a material adverse effect on our business, financialbusiness.
FDIC receivership or conservatorship of the Bank Partner that issues loan participations could adversely affect our business.
Loan participations that we purchase or sell are issued by one of our Bank Partners, all of which are subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). If that Bank Partner becomes insolvent, is in an unsound condition or resultsengages in violations of operations.certain laws or regulations applicable to it, the FDIC could be appointed as conservator or receiver for the Bank Partner. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC, as conservator or receiver of the Bank Partner, is authorized to repudiate any “contract” of the Bank Partner if the FDIC determines that the performance of the contract is burdensome and the repudiation would promote the orderly administration of the Bank Partner’s affairs. Upon such repudiation, the FDIC would be required to pay actual direct compensatory damages. The loan participations we purchase or sell are structured with
the intent that they are entitled to the participation safe harbor set forth in the FDIC rule regarding “Treatment by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Conservator or Receiver of Financial Assets Transferred by an Insured Depository Institution in Connection With a Securitization or Participation” (the “FDIC Safe Harbor”). Consequently, the loan participations we purchase or sell should not be subject to the rights and powers of the FDIC. However, if the loan participations were found not to satisfy the FDIC Safe Harbor, the FDIC would be permitted to repudiate the transfer of the applicable loan participations. If the FDIC successfully repudiated any loan participation transfers, we could be subject to claims for damages or other remedies related to breaches of certain representations and warranties we make to purchasers of participations or obligations to repurchase loan participations previously sold to purchasers, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Information Technology and Security Risks
Cyber-attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse effect on our business.
In the normal course of our business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential information regarding our Bank Partners, our merchants and consumers. We also have arrangements in place with certain of our third-party service providers that require us to share consumer information. Although we devote significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of our systems through information security and business continuity programs, our facilities and systems, and those of our Bank Partners, merchants and third-party service providers, are vulnerable to external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors, and other similar events. We, our Bank Partners, our merchants and our third-party service providers have experienced all of these events in the past and expect to continue to experience them in the future. We also face security threats from malicious third parties that could obtain unauthorized access to our systems and networks, which threats we anticipate will continue to grow in scope and complexity over time. These events could interrupt our business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of our systems, products and services. Although the impact to date from these events has not had a material adverse effect on us, this may not be the case in the future.
Information security risks in the financial services industry have increased recently, in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized criminals, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. In addition to cyber-attacks and other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers recently have engaged in attacks that are designed to disrupt key business services, such as consumer-facing websites. We may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. We employ detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents. Nonetheless, early detection efforts may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. We also may fail to detect the existence of a security breach related to the information of our Bank Partners, merchants and consumers that we retain as part of our business and may be unable to prevent unauthorized access to that information.
We also face risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding borrowers through various third parties, including our Bank Partners, our merchants and data processors. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks. Because we do not control these third parties or oversee the security of their systems, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact us through no fault of our own, and in some cases we may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. While we regularly conduct security assessments of significant third-party service providers, our third-party information security protocols may not be sufficient to withstand a cyber-attack or other security breach.
The access by unauthorized persons to, or the improper disclosure by us of, confidential information regarding GreenSky program customers or our own proprietary information, software, methodologies and business secrets could interrupt our business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to our reputation or a loss of confidence in the security of our systems, products and services, all of which
could have a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, there recently have been a number of well-publicized attacks or breaches affecting companies in the financial services industry that have heightened concern by consumers, which could also intensify regulatory focus, cause users to lose trust in the security of the industry in general and result in reduced use of our services and increased costs, all of which could also have a material adverse effect on our business.
Furthermore, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of our personnel continue to work remotely. This working environment could increase our cyber-security risk, create data accessibility concerns, and make us more susceptible to communication disruptions, any of which could adversely impact our business operations. We continue to implement physical and cyber-security measures to ensure that our systems remain functional in order to serve our operational needs and prevent disruptions to our business.
Disruptions in the operation of our computer systems and third-party data centers could have an adverse effect on our business.
Our Organizationalability to deliver products and services to our Bank Partners, other funding sources and merchants, service loans originated by our Bank Partners and otherwise operate our business and comply with applicable laws depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer systems and third-party data centers, as well as those of our Bank Partners, merchants and third-party service providers.
These computer systems and third-party data centers may encounter service interruptions at any time due to system or software failure, natural disasters, severe weather conditions, health pandemics, terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks or other events. Any of such catastrophes could have a negative effect on our business and technology infrastructure (including our computer network systems), on our Bank Partners, other funding sources and merchants and on consumers. Catastrophic events also could prevent or make it more difficult for customers to travel to our merchants’ locations to shop, thereby negatively impacting consumer spending in the affected regions (or in severe cases, nationally), and could interrupt or disable local or national communications networks, including the payment systems network, which could prevent customers from making purchases or payments (temporarily or over an extended period). These events also could impair the ability of third parties to provide critical services to us. All of these adverse effects of catastrophic events could result in a decrease in the use of our solution and payments to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In addition, the implementation of technology changes and upgrades to maintain current and integrate new systems may cause service interruptions, transaction processing errors or system conversion delays and may cause us to fail to comply with applicable laws, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We expect that new technologies and business processes applicable to the consumer financial services industry will continue to emerge and that these new technologies and business processes may be better than those we currently use. We may not be able to successfully adopt new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete and better ones become available. A failure to maintain and/or improve current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in our operations or cause our solution to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Some aspects of our platform include open source software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affect our business.
Aspects of our platform include software covered by open source licenses. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by United States courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our platform. If portions of our proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, we could be required to publicly release the affected portions of our source code, re-engineer all or a portion of our technologies or otherwise be limited in the licensing of our technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of our technologies and loan products. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Many of the risks associated with the use of open source software cannot be eliminated and could adversely affect our business.
Legal Organization and Capital Structure Risks
We are a holding company with no operations of our own and, as such, depend on our subsidiaries for cash to fund all of our operations and expenses, including future dividend payments, if any.
We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our deferred tax assets and our equity interest in GS Holdings, which has the sole equity interest in GSLLC. We have no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. We determined that GS Holdings is a variable interest entity ("VIE") and that we are the primary beneficiary of GS Holdings. Accordingly, pursuant to the VIE accounting model, we began consolidating GS Holdings in our consolidated financial statements following the IPO closing. In the event of a change in accounting guidance or amendments to the operating agreement of GS Holdings resulting in us no longer having a
controlling interest in GS Holdings, we may not be able to continue consolidating its results of operations with our own, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
GS Holdings is treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes, and GSLLC is treated as an entity disregarded as separate from GS Holdings for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, neither GS Holdings nor GSLLC is subject to United States federal income tax. Instead, taxable income is allocated to the members of GS Holdings, including us. Accordingly, we incur income taxes on our proportionate share of any net taxable income of consolidated GS Holdings. We intend to cause GSLLC to make distributions to GS Holdings and to cause GS Holdings to make distributions to its unit holders in an amount sufficient to cover all applicable taxes payable by such unit holders determined according to assumed rates, payments owing under the tax receivable agreement ("TRA") and dividends, if any, declared by us. The ability of GSLLC to make distributions to GS Holdings, and of GS Holdings to make distributions to us, is limited by their obligations to satisfy their own obligations to their creditors. Further, future and current financing arrangements of GSLLC and GS Holdings contain, and future obligations could contain, negative covenants limiting such distributions. Additionally, our right to receive assets upon the liquidation or reorganization of GS Holdings, or indirectly from GSLLC, will be effectively subordinated to the claims of each entity’s creditors. To the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of GS Holdings or GSLLC, our claims may still be subordinate to any security interest in, or other lien on, its assets and to any of its debt or other obligations that are senior to our claims.
To the extent that we need funds and GSLLC or GS Holdings are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation, or are otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition. In addition, because tax distributions are based on an assumed tax rate, GS Holdings may be required to make tax distributions that, in the aggregate, may exceed the amount of taxes that GS Holdings would have paid if it were itself taxed on its net income (loss) at the assumed rate.
Funds used by GS Holdings to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will not be available for reinvestment in our business. Moreover, the tax distributions that GS Holdings will be required to make may be substantial and may exceed (as a percentage of GS Holdings’ income) the overall effective tax rate applicable to a similarly situated corporate taxpayer.
We may be required to pay additional taxes as a result of the newan IRS audit of GS Holdings.
For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, GS Holdings is subject to U.S. federal income tax partnership audit rules.
Therules enacted as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 changed(the “Partnership Audit Regime”). Under the rules applicable to U.S. federal income tax audits of partnerships, including entities such as GS Holdings that are taxed as a partnership. Under these rules (which generally are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017),Partnership Audit Regime, subject to certain exceptions, audit adjustments to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of an entity (and any member’s share thereof) isare determined, and taxes, interest, and penalties attributable thereto, are assessed and collected, at the entity level. Although it is uncertain how these rules will be implemented, itIt is possible that theythe Partnership Audit Regime could result in GS Holdings being required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties as a result of an audit adjustment, and we, as a member of GS Holdings, could be required to indirectly bear the economic burden of those taxes, interest, and penalties even though we may not otherwise have been required to pay additional corporate-level taxes as a result of the related audit adjustment.
Under certain circumstances, GS Holdings may be eligible to make an election to cause members (including us) to take into account the amount
The changes created by these new rules are sweeping and in many respects dependent on the promulgation of future regulations or other guidance by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The owners of the Class B common stock, who also are the Continuing LLC Members, control us and their interests may conflict with yours in the future.
The owners of the Class B common stock, who also are the Continuing LLC Members, control us. Each share of our Class B common stock initiallycurrently entitles its holders to ten votes on all matters presented to our stockholders generally. Once the collective holdings of those owners in the aggregate are less than 15% of the combined economic interest in us, each share of Class B common stock will entitle its holder to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by our stockholders.
The owners of the Class B common stock owned the vast majority of the combined voting power of our Class A and Class B common stock as of December 31, 2018.2021. Accordingly, those owners, if voting in the same manner, will be able to control the election and removal of our directors and thereby determine our corporate and management policies, including potential mergers or acquisitions, payment of dividends, asset sales, amendment of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and other significant corporate transactions for so long as they retain significant ownership of us. This concentration of ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control of our Company, which may reduce the value of an investment in our Class A common stock. So long as they continue to own a significant amount of our combined voting power, even if such amount is less than 50%, they will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions.
In addition, the owners of the Class B common stock, as Continuing LLC Members, owned approximately 70%had ownership of the Holdco Units as of approximately 57% for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. Because they hold the majority of their economic ownership interest in our business through GS Holdings, rather than GreenSky, Inc., these existing unit holders may have conflicting interests with holders of our Class A common stock. For example, the Continuing LLC Members may have different tax positions from us, which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when to dispose of assets and whether and when to incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, especially in light of the existence of the TRA. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into account the tax considerations of the Continuing LLC Members even where no similar benefit would accrue to us. It is through their ownership of Class B common stock that they may be able to influence, if not control, decisions such as these.
We will be required to pay for certain tax benefits we may claim arising in connection with the merger of the Former Corporate Investors, our purchase of Holdco Units and future exchanges of Holdco Units under the Exchange Agreement, which payments could be substantial.
On the date of our IPO, we were treated for United States federal income tax purposes as having directly purchased Holdco Units from the Exchanging Members. In the future, the Continuing LLC Members will be able to exchange their Holdco Units (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustments for certain subdivisions (stock splits), combinations, or purchases of Class A common stock or Holdco Units, or for cash (based on the market price of the shares of Class A common stock), at our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our board of directors). As a result of these transactions, and our acquisition of the equity of certain of the Former Corporate Investors, we are and will become entitled to certain tax basis adjustments with respect to GS Holdings’ tax basis in its assets. As a result, the amount of income tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future may be reduced by the increase (for income tax purposes) in depreciation and amortization deductions attributable to our interests in GS Holdings. An increase in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain assets to the extent tax basis is allocated to those assets. The IRS, however, may challenge all or part of that tax basis adjustment, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
We entered into the TRA with the TRA Parties that will provide for the payment by us of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in United States federal, state and local income tax that we realize or are deemed to realize, as a result of (i) the tax basis adjustments referred to above, (ii) any incremental tax basis adjustments attributable to payments made pursuant to the TRA, and (iii) any deemed interest deductions arising from payments made by us pursuant to the TRA. While the actual amount of the adjusted tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the basis of our proportionate share of GS Holdings’ assets on the dates of exchanges, the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of each exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the deductions and
other adjustments to taxable income to which GS Holdings is entitled, and the amount and timing of
our income, we expect that during the anticipated term of the TRA, the payments that we may make could be substantial. Payments under the TRA may give rise to additional tax benefits and, therefore, to additional potential payments under the TRA. In addition, the TRA provides for interest accrued from the due date (without extensions) of the corresponding tax return for the taxable year with respect to which the payment obligation arises to the date of payment under the TRA.
Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the TRA, we expect that the tax savings associated with the purchase of Holdco Units in connection with the IPO and future exchanges of Holdco Units (assuming such future exchanges occurred at December 31, 20182021 and assuming automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) would aggregate to approximately $689.7$728.5 million based on the closing price on December 31, 20182021 of $9.57$11.43 per share of our Class A common stock. Under such scenario, assuming future payments are made on the date each relevant tax return is due, without extensions, we would be required to pay approximately 85%84% of such amount, or $586.3$614.5 million.
There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if, as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise, (i) the payments under the TRA exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the TRA and/or (ii) distributions to us by GS Holdings are not sufficient to permit us to make payments under the TRA after paying our other obligations. For example, were the IRS to challenge a tax basis adjustment or other deductions or adjustments to taxable income of GS Holdings, we will not be reimbursed for any payments that may previously have been made under the TRA, except that excess payments will be netted against payments otherwise to be made, if any, after our determination of such excess. As a result, in certain circumstances we could make payments under the TRA in excess of our ultimate cash tax savings. In addition, the payments under the TRA are not conditioned upon any recipient’s continued ownership of interests in us or GS Holdings, and the right to receive payments can be assigned.
For additional information regarding the TRA, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
In certain circumstances, including certain changes of control of our Company, payments by us under the TRA may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the TRA.
The TRA provides that (i) in the event that we materially breach any of our material obligations under the TRA, whether as a result of failure to make any payment, failure to honor any other material obligation required thereunder or by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the TRA in a bankruptcy or otherwise, (ii) if, at any time, we elect an early termination of the TRA, or (iii) upon certain changes of control of our Company, our (or our successor’s) obligations under the TRA (with respect to all Holdco Units, whether or not such units have been exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would accelerate and become payable in a lump sum amount equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits calculated based on certain assumptions, including that we would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions, tax basis and other benefits subject to the TRA.
As a result of the foregoing, if we breach a material obligation under the TRA, if we elect to terminate the TRA early or if we undergo a change of control, we would be required to make an immediate lump-sum payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax savings, which payment may be required to be made significantly in advance of the actual realization of such future tax savings, and the actual cash tax savings ultimately realized may be significantly less than the corresponding TRA payments. In these situations, our obligations under the TRA could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity. There is no assurance that we willWe may not be able to fund or finance our obligations under the TRA. Additionally, the obligation to make a lump sum payment on a change of control may deter potential acquirers, which could negatively affect our stockholders’ potential returns. If we had elected to terminate the TRA as of December 31, 2018,2021, based on the closing price on December 31, 20182021 of $9.57$11.43 per share of our Class A common stock, and a discount rate equal to 5.95%4.89% per annum, compounded annually, we estimate that we would have been required to pay $356.4$426.4 million in the aggregate under the TRA.
For additional information regarding the TRA, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as a result of our ownership of GS Holdings and GSLLC, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently contemplated and could have an adverse effect on our business.
Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the 1940 Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if (i) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (ii) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We do not believe that we are an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act.
Because GreenSky, Inc. is the managing member of GS Holdings, and GS Holdings is the managing member of GSLLC, we indirectly operate and control all of the business and affairs of GS Holdings and its subsidiaries, including GSLLC. On that basis, we believe that our interest in GS Holdings and GSLLC is not an “investment security,” as that term is used in the 1940 Act. However, if we were to cease participation in the management of GS Holdings and GSLLC, our interest in such entities could be deemed an “investment security” for purposes of the 1940 Act.
We, GS Holdings and GSLLC intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. However, if we were to be deemed an investment company, restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure and our ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our certificate of incorporation provides, subject to certain exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for certain stockholder litigation matters, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it findsthey find more favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or stockholders.
Pursuant to our certificate of incorporation, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (2) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (3) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL, our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws or (4) any other action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine. The forum selection clause in our certificate of incorporation may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us or our directors and officers and may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it findsthey find more favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees or stockholders. The exclusive forum provision does not apply to any actions under United States federal securities laws.
By purchasing shares of our Class A common stock, you will have agreed and consented to the provisions set forth in our certificate of incorporation related to choice of forum. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Class A Common Stock Risks
An active trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained, which may make it difficult to sell shares of Class A common stock.
Our Class A common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “GSKY.” An active trading market for our Class A common stock may not be sustained, which would make it difficult for you to sell your shares of Class A common stock at an attractive price (or at all).
The market price of our Class A common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile.
Our stock price has declined significantly since our May 2018 IPO and has exhibited substantial volatility. Our stock price may be volatile, which could cause the value of our Class A common stockcontinue to decline.
The market price of our Class A common stock may become highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volumefluctuate in our Class A common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market and political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of our Class A common stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our results of operations could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors dueresponse to a number of potentialevents and factors, including our proposed merger with Goldman Sachs, the COVID-19 pandemic mitigation efforts in response thereto, variations in our quarterly or annual results of operations, additions or departures of key management personnel, the loss of key Bank Partners, other funding sources, merchants or Sponsors, changes in our earnings estimates (if provided) or failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or the investment community with respect to us or our industry, adverse announcements by us or others and developments affecting us, announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments, actions by institutional stockholders, and increases in market interest rates that may lead investors in our shares to demand a higher yield, and in response the market price of shares of our Class A common stock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell your shares of Class A common stock at or above the price you paid for them (or at all).
We are currently subject to putative securities class action litigation in connection with our IPO and may be subject to similar litigation in the future. If the outcome of this litigation is unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company and certain of its officers and directors have been named as defendants in numerous putative securities class actions in connection with our IPO (“the Securities Litigation”). See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for a description of the Securities Litigation. In the future, especially following periods of volatility in the market price of our shares of Class A common stock, other purported class action or derivative complaints may be filed against us. In addition to diverting financial and management resources, this type of litigation can result in adverse publicity that could harm our brand or reputation, regardless of its merits or whether we are ultimately held liable, and a judgment or settlement in connection with any such litigation that is not covered by, or is significantly in excess of, our insurance coverage could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As a newly public company, we are incurring, and will continue to incur, increased costs and are subject to additional regulations and requirements, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance matters, which could lower profits and make it more difficult to run our business.
As a newly public company, we are incurring, and will continue to incur, significant legal, accounting, reporting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements and costs of recruiting and retaining non-executive directors. We also are incurring costs associated with compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and various other costs of a public company. The expenses generally incurred by public companies for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. Our management is devoting a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements. These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors and board committees and serve as executive officers.
Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our Class A common stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.
Failure to comply with the requirements to design, implement and maintain effective internal controls could have an adverse effect on our business and stock price.
As a public company, we are subject to significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environment and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company.
If we are unable to establish and maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and harm our operating results. In addition, beginning with
We concluded that our annual report for the fiscal year endinginternal controls were effective as of December 31, 2019, we will be required pursuant to SEC rules to furnish a report by management2021. See Part II, Item 9A "Management's Report on among other things, the effectiveness of our internal controlInternal Control over financial reporting. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the SEC rules commencing the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC or the date on which we are no longer an “emerging growth company” (as defined in the JOBS Act). See “-We are an ‘emerging growth company,’ as defined under the federal securities laws, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.” Testing and maintaining internal controls may divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to our business.Financial Reporting." We may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the SEC rules or our independent registered public accounting firm may not issue an unqualified opinion. If, in a future period, either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline and could subject us to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined under the federal securities laws, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make ourCurrent owners of Class A common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Securities Act, and we take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, among other things, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders do not have access to certain information that they may deem important.
An emerging growth company can utilize the extended transition period provided in the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. However, we chose to “opt out” of such extended transition period and, thus, will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for companies that are not emerging growth companies. Our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.
We could be an emerging growth company until December 31, 2023, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if our total annual gross revenues exceed $1.07 billion, if we issue more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during any three-year period or if the market value of our Class A common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30, 2019 or any June 30 thereafter. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock, our stock price may be more volatile and the price of our Class A common stock may decline.
You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional Class A common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue authorized but unissued shares of Class A common stock and rights relating to Class A common stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by our board of directors in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. We have reserved 24,000,000 shares for issuance under our 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, subject to adjustment in certain events. Any Class A common stock that we issue, including under our 2018 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage ownership held by existing investors.
Because we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our Class A common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your Class A common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.
We have no current plans to pay cash dividends on our Class A common stock. The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and operating results, our available cash, current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaryGS Holdings to us and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, the terms of our existing financing arrangements restrict or limit our ability to pay cash dividends. Accordingly, we may not pay any dividends on our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our Class A common stock or offering debt or other equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity or shares of preferred stock. Future acquisitions could require substantial additional capital in excess of cash from operations. We would expect to obtain the capital required for acquisitions through a combination of additional issuances of equity, corporate indebtedness and/or cash from operations.
Issuing additional shares of our Class A common stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our Class A common stock or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our Class A common stock. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our Class A common stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing and nature of our future offerings.
Future sales, or the expectation of future sales, of shares of our Class A common stock, including sales by Continuing LLC Members, could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline.
The sale of a substantial number of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, including sales by the Continuing LLC Members, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of shares of our Class A common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price we deem appropriate. In addition, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, pursuant to certain provisions of the Exchange Agreement, the Continuing LLC Members may exchange Holdco Units (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for certain subdivisions (stock splits), combinations, or purchases of Class A common stock or Holdco Units, or for cash (based on the market price of the shares of Class A common stock), at
our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our board of directors). All of the Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock are exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock or cash, at our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our board of directors), subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement.
Our certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue additional shares of Class A common stock and rights relating to Class A common stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by our board of
directors in its sole discretion. In accordance with the DGCL and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, we also may issue preferred stock that has designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to shares of Class A common stock. Similarly, GS Holdings Agreement permits GS Holdings to issue an unlimited number of additional limited liability company interests of GS Holdings with designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to the Holdco Units, and which may be exchangeable for shares of our Class A common stock.
Assuming the Continuing LLC Members exchangeexchanged all of their Holdco Units for shares of our Class A common stock on December 31, 2021, up to an additional 128,549,55569,494,728 shares of Class A common stock will bewould have been eligible for sale in the public market, the majority of which areis held by our executive officers, directors and their affiliated entities, and will beis subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 and various vesting agreements. Additionally, certain of our executive officers and directors own options exercisable for shares of Class A common stock.
As unvested Class A common stock awards issued pursuant to our 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan vest, the market price of our shares of Class A common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
These factors also could make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our shares of Class A common stock or other securities.
Our capital structure may have a negative impact on our stock price.
In July 2017, S&P Dow Jones, a provider ofMany widely-followed stock indices announced thatdo not consider companies with multiple share classes, such as ours, will not be eligible for inclusion in certain of their indices. As a result, our Class A common stock will likelyis not be eligible for these stock indices. Additionally, FTSE Russell, another provider of widely followed stock indices, recently stated that it plans to require new constituents of its indices to have at least five percent of their voting rights in the hands of public stockholders. Many investment funds are precluded from investing in companies that are not included in such indices, and these funds would be unable to purchase our Class A common stock. There is no assurance that otherOther stock indices will notmay take a similar approach to the S&P Dow Jones or FTSE Russell in the future. Exclusion from indices could make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors and, as a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could adversely affect the price of our Class A common stock.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions:
•authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;
•prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
•provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our bylaws;
•establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
•establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which our board of directors is divided into three classes, with each class serving for staggered three-year terms, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new board of directors at an annual meeting.
In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management or our board of directors. Stockholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to them. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede your ability to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
If securities and industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our Class A common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities and industry analysts publish about us and our business. If securities and industry analysts do not cover our Company, the trading price of our stock would likely be negatively impacted. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.
General Risks
The loss of the services of our senior management could adversely affect our business.
The experience of our senior management, including, in particular, David Zalik, our Chief Executive Officer, is a valuable asset to us. Our management team has significant experience in the consumer loan business and would be difficult to replace. Competition for senior executives in our industry is intense, and we may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or succeed members of our senior management team or other key personnel. Failure to retain talented senior leadership could have a material adverse effect on our business. We do not maintain key life insurance policies relating to our senior management.
Our business would suffer if we fail to attract and retain highly-skilled employees.
Our future success will depend on our ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly-qualified personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly information technology and sales. Trained and experienced personnel are in high demand and may be in short supply. Many of the companies with which we compete for experienced employees have greater resources than we do and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which increases their value to competitors that may seek to recruit them. We may not be able to attract, develop and maintain the skilled workforce necessary to operate our business, and labor expenses may increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of qualified personnel.
Our risk management processes and procedures may not be effective.
Our risk management processes and procedures seek to appropriately balance risk and return and mitigate our risks. We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and control the types of risk to which we and our Bank Partners are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk and operational risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss that arises when an obligor fails to meet the terms of an obligation. While our exposure to the direct economic cost of consumer credit risk is somewhat limited because, with the exceptions of Warehouse Loan Participations, R&D Participations and other loans for which we purchase the receivables, we do not hold the loans or the receivables underlying the loans that our Bank Partners originate, we are exposed to consumer credit risk in the form of both our FCR liability and our limited escrow requirement, as well as our ability to maintain relationships with our existing Bank Partners and recruit new bank partners. Market risk is the risk of loss due to changes in external market factors such as interest rates. Liquidity risk is the risk that financial condition or overall safety and soundness are adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet obligations and support business growth. Strategic risk is the risk from changes in the business environment, improper implementation of decisions or inadequate responsiveness to changes in the business environment. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed processes, people or systems, external events (e.g., natural disasters), compliance, reputational or legal matters and includes those risks as they relate directly to us as well as to third parties with whom we contract or otherwise do business.
Management of our risks depends, in part, upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. If these models are ineffective at predicting future losses or are otherwise inadequate, we may incur unexpected losses or otherwise be adversely affected. In addition, the information we use in managing our credit and other risks may be inaccurate or incomplete as a result of error or fraud, both of which may be difficult to detect and avoid. There also may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated, including when processes are changed or new products and services are introduced. If our risk management framework does
not effectively identify and control our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses or be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If assumptions or estimates we use in preparing our financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, our reported results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
We are required to make various assumptions and estimates in preparing our financial statements under United States generally accepted accounting principles (��GAAP”), and in determining certain disclosures required under GAAP, including for purposes of determining share-based compensation; asset impairment; reserves related to litigation and other legal matters and contingencies and other regulatory exposures; the amounts recorded for certain contractual payments to be paid to, or received from, our merchants and others under contractual arrangements; fair value measurements of derivative instruments, servicing assets and liabilities and loans receivable held for sale; and measurement of financial guarantees. If the assumptions or estimates underlying our financial statements are incorrect, the actual amounts realized on transactions and balances subject to those estimates will be different, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Future changes in financial accounting standards may significantly change our reported results of operations.
GAAP is subject to standard setting or interpretation by the FASB, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the "PCAOB"), the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.
Additionally, our assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial results. GAAP and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to our business, including revenue recognition, FCRs, loan participation sales, and share-based compensation are highly complex and involve subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by us. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by us (i) could require us to make changes to our accounting systems that could increase our operating costs and (ii) could significantly change our reported or expected financial performance.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth selected information concerning our principal facilities as of December 31, 2018.
2021. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Location | | Owned/Leased | | Approximate Square Footage |
| Corporate Headquarters: | | | | |
| Atlanta, Georgia | | Leased | | 38,60051,500 |
| Primary Call Centers: | | | | |
Atlanta, Georgia | | Leased | | 82,400 |
Crescent Hills, Kentucky | | Leased | | 26,600 |
Additional Facilities: | | | | |
Alpharetta, Georgia(1)
| | Leased | | 22,300 |
| |
Atlanta, Georgia(1) | In November 2018, we entered into an agreement to expand our leased property in | Leased | | 82,400 |
| Additional Facilities: | | | | |
Alpharetta, by approximately 13,500 square feet, which is reflected in the above total. As of December 31, 2018, we did not occupy the expanded space.Georgia | | Leased | | 14,400 |
(1)The Atlanta, Georgia call center is leased from a related party under common management control. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for more information on related party transactions.
We believe our current facilities are adequate and that we will be able to find suitable space to accommodate any potential future expansion.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to legal proceedings incidental to our business. See Note 1314 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for information regarding legal proceedings. No assurance is given regarding the outcome of any of these proceedings.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information and Holders of Record
On May 24, 2018, our Class A common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "GSKY." Prior to that time, there was no public market for our stock. As of February 28, 2019,March 8, 2022, there were approximately 7 holderswas one holder of record of our Class A common stock, which does not include persons whose stock is held in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers, banks and intermediaries. Our Class B common stock is neither listed nor traded on any stock exchange, nor is there an established public trading market for this class of common stock. As of December 31, 2021, there were 29 Class B common stock holders of record.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The equity compensation plan information required inRefer to Part III, Item 201(d)12 "Security Ownership of Regulation S-K is set forth in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company's annual meeting of stockholders, which we intend to file with the SEC no later than April 30, 2019,Certain Beneficial Owners and is incorporated by reference in this annual report on Form 10-K. Additionally, refer to Management and Related Stockholder Matters" as well as Note 1112 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional information on our equity compensation plans.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table presents information with respect to our purchases of our Class A common stock during the fourth quarter in the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. See Note 1011 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion of our Class A common stock repurchase program.repurchases. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased(1) | | Average Price Paid per Share(1) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs |
| October 1, 2021 through October 31, 2021 | | 23,085 | | | $ | 12.12 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| November 1, 2021 through November 30, 2021 | | 4,500 | | | $ | 12.03 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| December 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 | | 4,312 | | | $ | 11.34 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Total | | 31,897 | | | | | — | | | |
(1)For the periods presented, represents shares surrendered to us to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of equity awards.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share(1) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs(2) | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs(2) |
| October 1, 2018 through October 31, 2018 | | — |
| | N/A |
| | — |
| | N/A |
|
| November 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018 | | 2,670,221 |
| | $ | 9.61 |
| | 2,670,221 |
| | $ | 124,346,520 |
|
| December 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 | | 2,010,990 |
| | $ | 9.02 |
| | 2,010,990 |
| | $ | 106,215,305 |
|
| Total | | 4,681,211 |
| | | | 4,681,211 |
| | |
| |
| Reported amounts are calculated based on the price of the securities purchased excluding any direct costs incurred to acquire the stock, such as commissions, which totaled $93,624 during the fourth quarter 2018. |
| |
(2)
| On November 6, 2018, we announced our authorization to repurchase up to $150 million of our Class A common stock at management's discretion from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program has no time limit and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. |
Performance Graph
The following graph matches GreenSky, Inc.'s cumulative 7-month43-month total stockholder return on its Class A common stock with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the RDG SmallCap Technology Index. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our Class A common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all dividends) from May 24, 2018 (the date our Class A common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market) to December 31, 2018.2021.
* $100$100 invested on 5/24/18 in GreenSky, Inc. Class A common stock and on 4/30/18 in the indexes,indices, including reinvestment of dividends.
| | | | 4/30/18
or 5/24/18* | 5/31/18 | 6/30/18 | 7/31/18 | 8/31/18 | 9/30/18 | 10/31/18 | 11/30/18 | 12/31/18 | | 4/30/18 or 5/24/18* | 12/31/18 | 12/31/19 | 12/31/20 | 12/31/21 |
| GreenSky, Inc. | $ | 100.00 |
| 114.60 |
| 90.54 |
| 74.06 |
| 86.69 |
| 77.05 |
| 56.42 |
| 39.85 |
| $ | 40.97 |
| GreenSky, Inc. | $ | 100.00 | | $ | 40.97 | | $ | 38.10 | | $ | 19.82 | | $ | 48.63 | |
| NASDAQ Composite | $ | 100.00 |
| 105.28 |
| 106.33 |
| 108.58 |
| 114.56 |
| 113.66 |
| 103.13 |
| 103.79 |
| $ | 94.08 |
| NASDAQ Composite | 100.00 | | 94.64 | | 129.36 | | 187.47 | | 229.04 | |
| RDG SmallCap Technology | $ | 100.00 |
| 110.88 |
| 111.67 |
| 109.93 |
| 113.56 |
| 108.06 |
| 93.79 |
| 90.38 |
| $ | 79.81 |
| RDG SmallCap Technology | 100.00 | | 88.40 | | 87.91 | | 178.78 | | 84.58 | |
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
Dividends
We have never declared nor paid cash dividends on our Class A common stock. We currently do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
The Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2016 were derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements not included in this Form 10-K. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. You should read the following financial information together with the information under Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Item 8.
GS Holdings and GSLLC are our predecessors for accounting purposes and, accordingly, amounts prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO represent the historical consolidated operations of either GS Holdings or GSLLC and its subsidiaries. The amounts as of December 31, 2018 and during the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018 represent those of consolidated GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, GreenSky, Inc. did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and initial capitalization. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information on our organization.
[RESERVED]
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| Selected Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Total revenue | | $ | 414,673 |
| | $ | 325,887 |
| | $ | 263,865 |
| | $ | 173,457 |
|
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | | 160,439 |
| | 89,708 |
| | 79,145 |
| | 36,506 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | | 261,883 |
| | 180,288 |
| | 144,054 |
| | 80,351 |
|
| Operating profit | | 152,790 |
| | 145,599 |
| | 119,811 |
| | 93,106 |
|
| Total other income/(expense), net | | (19,276 | ) | | (6,931 | ) | | 4,653 |
| | 713 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | | 133,514 |
| | 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
| | 93,819 |
|
| Income tax expense | | 5,534 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Net income | | 127,980 |
| | 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
| | 93,819 |
|
| Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 103,724 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | 24,256 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Earnings per share of Class A common stock(1): | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.43 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Diluted | | $ | 0.41 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| |
(1)
| Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock are applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| Selected Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 303,390 |
| | $ | 224,614 |
| | $ | 185,243 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 155,109 |
| | 129,224 |
| | 42,871 |
|
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | | 2,876 |
| | 73,606 |
| | 41,268 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | | 306,979 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total assets | | 802,905 |
| | 462,889 |
| | 302,205 |
|
| Finance charge reversal liability | | 138,589 |
| | 94,148 |
| | 68,064 |
|
| Term loan | | 386,822 |
| | 338,263 |
| | — |
|
| Tax receivable agreement liability | | 260,901 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total liabilities | | 837,670 |
| | 488,928 |
| | 89,995 |
|
| Total temporary equity | | — |
| | 430,348 |
| | 335,720 |
|
| Noncontrolling interest | | (60,349 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total permanent equity (deficit) | | (34,765 | ) | | (456,387 | ) | | (123,510 | ) |
| Total liabilities, temporary equity and permanent equity (deficit) | | 802,905 |
| | 462,889 |
| | 302,205 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Dollars(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data and unless otherwise indicated)
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based upon current plans, expectations and beliefs involving risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including those set forth under Part I, Item 1A.“1A“Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K.
Unless the context requires otherwise, "we," "us," "our," "GreenSky" and "the Company" refer to GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Organization
GreenSky, Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 12, 2017. The Company was formed for the purpose of completing an IPO of its Class A common stock and certain Reorganization Transactions (as detailed below) in order to carry on the business of GS Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries.GSLLC, a Georgia limited liability company, which is an operating entity. GS Holdings, a holding
company with no operating assets or operations, was organized as a wholly-owned subsidiary of GreenSky, Inc. in August 2017. On August 24, 2017, GS Holdings acquired a controlling100% interest in GSLLC, a Georgia limited liability company, which is an operating entity.GSLLC. Common membership interests of GS Holdings are referred to as "Holdco Units." See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for a detailed discussion of the Reorganization Transactions as(as defined in that note,note) and the IPO.
Executive Summary
For a Company overview, see Part I, Item 1.1 "Business."
We have achieved significant growthMerger Agreement
In September 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. ("Goldman Sachs"), and Goldman Sachs Bank USA ("Goldman Sachs Bank"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, (a) Goldman Sachs Bank will establish a new wholly‑owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub 1”) into which GreenSky, Inc. will be merged (the “Company Merger”), with Merger Sub 1 surviving the Company Merger as a wholly‑owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Bank; and (b) Goldman Sachs Bank will establish a new wholly‑owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub 2”) that will be merged into GS Holdings (the “Holdings Merger” and, together with the Company Merger, the “Mergers”). Consummation of the transaction is subject to the receipt of required regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in active merchants,Part II, Item 8 for additional information.
Covid-19 Pandemic
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization designated the novel coronavirus disease (referred to as "COVID-19") as a global pandemic.
The following are key impacts of COVID-19 on our business:
Transaction Volume. Our transaction volume began to be impacted significantly by COVID-19 in mid-March 2020, and total revenue, which has resultedcertain of our transaction volumes continue to be impacted. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our transaction volume increased 6% compared to the prior year. Our transaction volume growth was impacted by escalating supply chain constraints in the U.S. that we expect to shift transactions to future periods.
Portfolio Credit Losses. We entered the COVID-19 pandemic with historically strong net incomecredit performance and Adjusted EBITDA. Our low-cost go-to-market strategy, coupledwe believe our home improvement sector program borrowers, particularly in concert with our recurring revenue model, has helped us generatefocus on promotional credit, are financially resilient. To maintain our strong margins. credit position in this uncertain economic environment, we continue to emphasize our super-prime promotional loan programs with our merchants.
As the impact of COVID-19 continues to persist and evolve, GreenSky remains committed to serving GreenSky program borrowers and our Bank Partners and merchants, while caring for the safety of our associates and their families. The potential impact that COVID-19 could have on our financial condition and results of operations remains highly uncertain. For more information, refer to Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors" and, in particular, "– The global outbreak of the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, initially caused severe disruptions in the U.S. economy and our business, and may further impact our performance and results of operations."
2021 Results
The following are key business metrics and financial measures for the year ended December 31, 2021:
Business Metrics
•Transaction volume (as defined below) was $5.0$5.9 billion during the year ended December 31, 2018, representing an increase of 34% from $3.82021 compared to $5.5 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017, which in turn increased by 31% from $2.92020 (increase of 6%) and $6.0 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019 (decrease of 7%);
Active merchants totaled 14,907 as of December 31, 2018, representing an increase of 37% from 10,891 as of December 31, 2017, which in turn represented an increase of 48% from 7,361 as of December 31, 2016. Our total•Total revenue of $414.7$518.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 represented an increase of 27%2021 decreased by 1% from $325.9$525.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, which in turn represented an increase of 24%decreased by 1% from $263.9$532.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019;
Our net•The outstanding balance of loans serviced by our platform totaled $9.63 billion as of December 31, 2021 compared to $9.55 billion as of December 31, 2020 (increase of 1%) and $8.98 billion as of December 31, 2019 (increase of 6%);
•We maintained a strong consumer profile. For all loans originated on our platform during 2021, the credit-line weighted average consumer credit score was 780. Furthermore, consumers with credit scores over 780 comprised 42% of the loan servicing portfolio as of December 31, 2021, and over 90.9% of the loan servicing portfolio as of December 31, 2021 consisted of consumers with credit scores over 700.
•The 30-day delinquencies as of December 31, 2021 were 0.84%, an improvement of 15 basis points over December 31, 2020. The delinquency rate includes accounts that received COVID-19 assistance that are no longer in payment deferral. Less than 0.1% of the total loans serviced by our platform as of December 31, 2021 were in deferral status, compared to approximately 0.8% as of December 31, 2020 and approximately 4% at the peak in the second quarter of 2020.
Financial Measures
Net income of $128.0$117.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased by 8%2021 increased from $138.7$28.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017,2020. The increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 relates primarily to a reduction in cost of revenue largely driven by a decrease in change in fair value of our FCR liability, which was primarily a function of higher performance fees attributable to lower charge-offs and due to a lower balance of deferred interest loans subject to FCR as a result of our funding diversification that began in turn increasedmid-2020. The increase in net income was also impacted by 11% from $124.5a financial guarantee benefit of $15.2 million compared to financial guarantee expense of $5.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in 2018 was primarily attributable to the fair value change in FCR liability, higher interest expense and, to a lesser extent, income tax expense in the current year.
Our2020. Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) increased by 8% to $171.5of $208.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 from $159.42021 increased 97% compared to $105.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, which in turn increased by 22%2020.
Net income of $28.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 decreased from $130.7$96.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. The decrease in net income for the year ended December 31, 2020 relates primarily to cost of revenue acceleration associated with the transition to a diversified funding model in 2020. During the last four months of 2020, the Company facilitated sales of over $1.0 billion in whole loans or loan participations. Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) of $105.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2020 was largely consistent with the $105.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Information regarding our use of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most comparable GAAP (as defined below) measure, is included in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures."
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to financial measures presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we monitor Adjusted EBITDA to manage our business, make planning decisions, evaluate our performance and allocate resources. We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as net income before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to eliminate equity-based compensation and payments and certain non-cash and non-recurring expenses.
We believe that Adjusted EBITDA is one of the key financial indicators of our business performance over the long term and provides useful information regarding whether cash provided by operating activities is sufficient to maintain and grow our business. We believe that this methodology for determining Adjusted EBITDA can provide useful supplemental information to help investors better understand the economics of our business.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the analysis of other GAAP financial measures, such as net income. Some of the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA include:
•It does not reflect our current contractual commitments that will have an impact on future cash flows;
•It does not reflect the impact of working capital requirements or capital expenditures; and
•It is not a universally consistent calculation, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with using the measure of Adjusted EBITDA through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP
and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income, as presented below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net income | $ | 117,814 | | | $ | 28,662 | | | $ | 95,973 | |
Interest expense(1) | 26,269 | | | 25,024 | | | 23,860 | |
| Tax expense (benefit) | 13,880 | | | 1,597 | | | (7,125) | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 14,045 | | | 11,330 | | | 7,304 | |
Share-based compensation expense(2) | 15,660 | | | 14,923 | | | 13,769 | |
Change in financial guarantee liability - Non-renewal of Bank Partner(3) | — | | | — | | | 16,215 | |
Financial guarantee liability - Escrow(4) | — | | | — | | | (241) | |
Servicing asset and liability changes(5) | (13,773) | | | (2,157) | | | (29,679) | |
Mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations(6) | 2,604 | | | 10,655 | | | — | |
Discontinued charged-off receivables program(7) | — | | | — | | | (29,190) | |
Merger-related costs(8) | 11,735 | | | — | | | — | |
Transaction and non-recurring expenses(9) | 13,788 | | | 15,818 | | | 14,149 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 202,022 | | | $ | 105,852 | | | $ | 105,035 | |
(1)Interest expense on the Warehouse Facility and interest income on the loan receivables held for sale are not included in the adjustment above as amounts are components of cost of revenue and revenue, respectively.
(2)See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion of share-based compensation.
(3)Includes losses recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 associated with the financial guarantee arrangement for a Bank Partner that did not renew its loan origination agreement when it expired in November 2019. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion of financial guarantee arrangements.
(4)Includes non-cash charges related to our financial guarantee arrangements with our ongoing Bank Partners, which are primarily a function of new loans facilitated on our platform during the period increasing the contractual escrow balance and the associated financial guarantee liability. In the fourth quarter of 2020, due to expectations that some of these financial guarantees may require cash settlement, the Company discontinued adjusting EBITDA for financial guarantees.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net income | $ | 127,980 |
|
| $ | 138,668 |
| | $ | 124,464 |
|
| Interest expense | 23,584 |
|
| 7,536 |
| | — |
|
Tax expense(1) | 6,106 |
|
| 309 |
| | 281 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,478 |
|
| 3,983 |
| | 3,708 |
|
Equity-related expense(2) | 6,054 |
|
| 4,253 |
| | 2,288 |
|
Fair value change in servicing liabilities(3) | 945 |
|
| 2,071 |
| | — |
|
Non-recurring transaction expenses(4) | 2,393 |
|
| 2,612 |
| | — |
|
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 171,540 |
| | $ | 159,432 |
| | $ | 130,741 |
|
| |
(1)
| Includes both corporate and non-corporate tax expense. Non-corporate tax expense is included within general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations included in Item 8. Prior to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions, we did not have any corporate income tax expense.
|
| |
(2)
| Includes equity-based compensation to employees and directors, as well as equity-based payments to non-employees.
|
| |
(3)
| Includes the non-cash impact of the initial recognition of servicing liabilities and subsequent fair value changes in such servicing liabilities during the periods presented. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 for additional discussion of our servicing liabilities. |
| |
(4)
| In 2018, non-recurring transaction expenses include certain costs associated with the Reorganization Transactions and our IPO, which were not deferrable against the proceeds of the IPO. Further, certain costs related to our March 2018 term loan upsizing were expensed as incurred, rather than deferred against the balance of the term loan and, therefore, are being added back to net income given the non-recurring nature of these expenses. In 2017, non-recurring transaction expenses include one-time fees paid to an affiliate of one of the members of the board of managers in conjunction with the August 2017 term loan transaction.
|
Further, we utilize Pro Forma Net Income, which we define(6)Mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations reflects changes in the fair value in the embedded derivative for sales facilitation obligations. The changes in fair value are recognized as consolidated net income, adjusteda mark-to-market expense in cost of revenue for non-recurring transaction expensesthe period. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion.
(7)Includes the amounts related to the now discontinued program of transferring our rights to charged-off receivables to third parties.
(8)Includes professional services fees related to the pending merger with Goldman Sachs.
(9)For the year ended December 31, 2021, primarily includes legal fees associated with IPO litigation and incremental pro forma tax expense assuming allregulatory matter. For the year ended December 31, 2020, primarily includes legal fees associated with IPO litigation and regulatory matter, increased costs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, professional fees associated with our strategic alternatives review process, and loss on remeasurement of our noncontrolling interests were subject to income taxation. Pro Forma Net Income is a useful measure because it makes our results more directly comparable to public companies that havetax receivable agreement liability. For the vast majority of their earnings subject to corporate income taxation.
Pro Forma Net Income has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, the analysis of other GAAP financial measures, such as net income. Some of the limitations of Pro Forma Net Income include:
It makes assumptions about tax expense, which may differ from actual results;
It is not a universally consistent calculation, which limits its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Management compensates for the inherent limitationsyear ended December 31, 2019, primarily includes legal fees associated with using the measure of Pro Forma Net Income through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Pro Forma Net Income to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income, as presented below.IPO litigation.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net income | $ | 127,980 |
|
| $ | 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
|
Non-recurring transaction expenses(1) | 2,393 |
|
| 2,612 |
| | — |
|
Incremental pro forma tax expense(2) | (21,248 | ) |
| (54,266 | ) | | (48,093 | ) |
| Pro Forma Net Income | $ | 109,125 |
|
| $ | 87,014 |
| | $ | 76,371 |
|
| |
(1)
| In 2018, non-recurring transaction expenses include certain costs associated with the Reorganization Transactions and our IPO, which were not deferrable against the proceeds of the IPO. Further, certain costs related to our March 2018 term loan upsizing were expensed |
as incurred, rather than deferred against the balance of the term loan and, therefore, are being added back to net income given the non-recurring nature of these expenses. In 2017, non-recurring transaction expenses include one-time fees paid to an affiliate of one of the members of the board of managers in conjunction with the August 2017 term loan transaction.
| |
(2)
| Represents the incremental tax effect on net income, adjusted for non-recurring transaction expenses, assuming that all consolidated net income was subject to corporate taxation for the periods presented. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we assumed effective tax rates of 19.7%, 38.4% and 38.6%, respectively.
|
Business Metrics
We review a number of operating and financial metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends, formulate plans and make strategic decisions, including the following. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Transaction Volume | | | | | | |
| Dollars (in millions) | | 5,866 | | | 5,515 | | | 5,954 | |
| Percentage increase (decrease) | | 6 | % | | (7) | % | | |
| Loan Servicing Portfolio | | | | | | |
| Dollars (in millions, at end of period) | | 9,631 | | | 9,549 | | | 8,984 | |
| Percentage increase | | 1 | % | | 6 | % | | |
| Cumulative Consumer Accounts | | | | | | |
| Number (in millions, at end of period) | | 4.4 | | | 3.7 | | | 3.0 | |
| Percentage increase | | 18 | % | | 23 | % | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Active Merchants | | | | | | |
| Number (at end of period) | | 14,907 |
| | 10,891 |
| | 7,361 |
|
| Percentage increase | | 37 | % | | 48 | % | | |
| Transaction Volume | | | | | | |
| Dollars (in millions) | | $ | 5,030 |
| | $ | 3,767 |
| | $ | 2,882 |
|
| Percentage increase | | 34 | % | | 31 | % | | |
| Loan Servicing Portfolio | | | | | | |
| Dollars (in millions, at end of period) | | $ | 7,341 |
| | $ | 5,390 |
| | $ | 3,832 |
|
| Percentage increase | | 36 | % | | 41 | % | | |
| Cumulative Consumer Accounts | | | | | | |
| Number (at end of period) | | 2,240,065 |
| | 1,565,166 |
| | 1,077,400 |
|
| Percentage increase | | 43 | % | | 45 | % | | |
Active Merchants. We define active merchants as home improvement merchants and healthcare providers that have submitted at least one consumer application during the 12 months ended at the date of measurement. Because our transaction volume is a function of the size, engagement and growth of our merchant network, active merchants, in aggregate, are an indicator of future revenue and profitability, although they are not directly correlated.
Transaction Volume. We define transaction volume as the dollar value of loans facilitated on our platform during a given period. Transaction volume is an indicator of revenue and overall platform profitability and has grown substantially in the past several years.profitability.
Loan Servicing Portfolio. We define our loan servicing portfolio as the aggregate outstanding consumer loan balance (principal plus accrued interest and fees) serviced by our platform at the date of measurement. Our loan servicing portfolio is an indicator of our servicing activities. The average loan servicing portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 20162019 was $6,303 million, $4,501 million$9.5 billion, $9.4 billion and $3,156 million,$8.2 billion, respectively.
Cumulative Consumer Accounts. We define cumulative consumer accounts as the aggregate number of consumer accounts approved on our platform since our inception, including accounts with both outstanding and zero balances. Although not directly correlated to revenue, cumulative consumer accounts is a measure of our brand awareness among consumers, as well as the value of the data we have been collecting from such consumers since our inception. We may use this data to support future growth by cross-marketing products and delivering potential additional customers to merchants that may not have been able to source those customers themselves.
Factors Affecting our Performance
Growth in ActiveRobust Network of Merchants and Transaction Volume. Growth trends in active merchants We derive transaction volumes from our robust network of merchants. Our revenues and financial results are heavily dependent on our transaction volume, are highly significant variables directly affecting our revenue and financial results. Both factors influencewhich represents the numberdollar amount of loans funded on our platform and, therefore, influences the fees that we earn and the per-unit cost of the services that we provide. Growth in active merchants andOur transaction volume dependdepends on our ability to retain our existing platform participants, add new participants and expand to new industry verticals. To support our efforts to increase our network of merchants, we continue to expand our sales and marketing groups, which focus on merchant
acquisition. Our sales and marketing team has collectively grown to 160 full-time-equivalents as of December 31, 2018 from 114 full-time-equivalents as of December 31, 2017 and 66 full-time-equivalents as of December 31, 2016.
Increasing Bank Partner Commitments. Bank Partner funding commitmentsRelationships; Other Funding. "Bank Partners" are integral to the successfederally insured banks that originate loans under the consumer financing and payments program that we administer for use by merchants on behalf of our ecosystem, as they allow us to facilitate moresuch
banks in connection with which we provide point-of-sale financing which enables us to serve more merchants and consumers.payments technology and related marketing, servicing, collection and other services (the "GreenSky program" or "program"). Our ability to generate and increase transaction volume and expand our loan servicing portfolio is, in part, dependent on securing sufficient(a) retaining our existing Bank Partners and having them renew and expand their commitments, from(b) adding new Bank Partners and/or (c) adding complementary funding arrangements to increase funding capacity. Our failure to do so could materially and adversely affect our business and our ability to grow. A Bank Partner’s funding commitment typically has an initial multi-year term, after which the commitment is either renewed (typically on an annual basis) or expires. No assurance is given that any of the current funding commitments of our Bank Partners and adding new Bank Partners. will be renewed.
As of December 31, 2018,2021, we had maximum commitments of approximately $11.8 billion in the aggregate from our Bank Partners, $4.8 billion of which were unused. Our efforts to grow existingfunding commitments from our ongoing Bank Partners of approximately $7.9 billion, a substantial majority of which are "revolving" commitments that replenish as outstanding loans are paid down. Of the funding commitments available at December 31, 2021 for use in the next 12 months, approximately $2.3 billion was unused and to attract new Bank Partners are integral partswe anticipate approximately $1.8 billion of our strategy.additional funding capacity will become available as loans pay down under revolving commitments during this period. As we add new Bank Partners, the use of their full commitments are often phasedtypically subject to a mutually agreed upon onboarding schedule. From time to time, certain of our Bank Partners have requested adjustments to the volume or type of loans that they originate, including, on occasion, temporary increases, decreases or suspensions of originations. We have generally honored these requests in the ordinary course of our relationships with our Bank Partners and, to date, they have not had a significant impact on the GreenSky program.
In addition to customary expansion of commitments from existing Bank Partners and the periodic addition of new Bank Partners to our funding group, we have diversified the funding for loans originated by our Bank Partners to include alternative structures with institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources. In the first half of 2021, theCompany executed an arrangement with a leading insurance company that included an initial sale of loanparticipationstotalingapproximately$135 millionandaforward flowcommitmentforthe saleofupto $1.5billionin additional loan participations over time.a one-year period.
On September 14, 2021, concurrently with the execution of the Merger Agreement and as a condition to the Company’s entry into the Merger Agreement, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a commitment letter for a backstop participation purchase facility with Goldman Sachs Bank. On November 17, 2021, such subsidiaries and Goldman Sachs Bank entered into the definitive agreements for such purchase facility, pursuant to which Goldman Sachs Bank provided such subsidiaries with (a) a commitment of up to $0.8 billion to purchase participations in loans originated by the Company’s Bank Partners under the GreenSky program during the period from the execution of definitive agreements for such purchase facility through the earlier of (i) the consummation of the Mergers pursuant to the Merger Agreement and (ii) the termination of the Merger Agreement in accordance with its terms, and (b) in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms prior to the consummation of the Mergers, a commitment of up to $1.0 billion to purchase participations in loans originated by the Company’s Bank Partners under the GreenSky program during the period from the Merger Agreement termination date through August 31, 2022.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, GreenSky executed approximately $2.0 billion of sales of loan participations and whole loans (inclusive of the arrangements referenced above). A portion of these transactions included the sale of participations previously purchased by the Warehouse SPV, and the related proceeds from such sales were used to pay down amounts previously borrowed under the Warehouse Facility.
If the Mergers are not consummated, we anticipate whole loan or loan participation sales to continue to be important to our funding capacity. Ifwe do not timely consummate our anticipated whole loan or loan participation sales, or if these sales combined withfunding commitments from our Bank Partners are not sufficient to support expected loan originations, it could limitourability to facilitateGreenSky program loansand our abilityto generate revenueat or abovecurrent levels.
Performance of the Loans in our Bank Partners Originate.Partners' Portfolios. While our Bank Partners bear substantially all of the credit risk on their wholly-owned loan portfolios, Bank Partner credit losses and prepayments impact our profitability as follows:in the following ways:
•Our contracts with our Bank Partners entitle us to incentive payments when the finance charges billed to borrowers exceed the sum of (i) an agreed-upon portfolio yield, (ii) a fixed servicing fee and (iii) realized credit losses. This incentive payment varies from month to month, primarily due to the amount of realized credit losses.
•With respect to deferred interest loans, we bill the consumerGreenSky program borrowers are billed for interest throughout the deferred interest promotional period, but the consumer isthey are not obligated to pay any interest if the loan isloans are repaid in full before the end of the promotional period. We are obligated to remit this accumulated billed interest to our Bank Partners to the extent the loan principal balances are paid off within the promotional period (each event, a finance charge reversal or "FCR") even though the interest billed to the consumerGreenSky program borrowers is reversed. Our maximum FCR liability is limited to the gross amount of finance charges billed during the promotional period, offset by (i) the collection of incentive payments from our Bank Partners during such period, (ii) proceeds received from transfers of previously charged-off loan receivables, ("Charged-Off Receivables") and (iii) recoveries on unsold charged-off receivables. Our profitability is impacted by the difference between the cash collected from the incentive payments and Charged-Off Receivables,these items and the cash to be remitted on a future date to settle our FCR liability. Our FCR liability quantifies our expected future obligation to remit previously billed interest with respect to deferred interest loans.
If•Under our Bank Partner agreements, if credit losses exceed an agreed-upon threshold, we make limited payments to our Bank Partners.Partners from the escrow accounts we establish for them. Our related maximum financial exposure is contractually limited to thethose escrow that we establish with each Bank Partner,amounts, which represented a weighted average target rate of 1.3%2.8% of the total outstanding loan balance as of December 31, 2018.2021. Cash set aside to meet this requirement is classified as restricted cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021, the financial guarantee liability associated with our escrow arrangements was approximately $102 million, which represents approximately 60% of the contractual escrow that we have established with each Bank Partner.
Performance of Loan Participations. We bear substantially all of the credit risk of loan receivables held for sale; however, our intent is that our holding period for such loan receivables is relatively brief.
For further discussion of our sensitivity to the credit risk exposure of our Bank Partners, see Part II, Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk—Credit risk.”
General Economic Conditions and Industry Trends. Our results of operations are impacted by the relative strength of the overall economy and its effect on unemployment, consumer spending behavior and consumer demand for our merchants’ products and services. As general economic conditions improve or deteriorate, the amount of consumer disposable income tends to fluctuate, which, in turn, impacts consumer spending levels and the willingness of consumers to take out loans to finance purchases. Specific economic factors, such as interest rate levels, changes in monetary and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence and, particularly, unemployment rates, also influence consumer spending and borrowing patterns. In addition, trends within the industry verticals in which we operate affect consumer spending on the products and services our merchants offer in those industry verticals. For example, the strength of the national and regional real estate markets and trends in new and existing home sales impact demand for home improvement goods and services and, as a result, the volume of loans originated to finance these purchases. In addition, trends in healthcare costs, advances in medical technology and increasing life expectancy are likely to impact demand for elective medical procedures and services. Refer to "Executive Summary" above for a discussion of the recent impact on our business from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Seasonality. See Part I, Item 1.1 "Business", for a seasonality discussion.
Components
Results of Operations Summary
Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
In the following results of operations discussion, unless otherwise indicated, references to 2021 and 2020 mean the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively.
Total Revenue
We generate a substantial majority of our total revenue from transaction fees paid by merchants each time aconsumer utilizes our platform to finance a purchase and, to a lesser extent, from fixed servicing fees on our loanservicing portfolio.portfolio and interest income from loan receivablesheld for sale.
Transaction fees.fees
We earn a specified transaction fee in connection with each purchase made by a consumer based on a loan’s terms and promotional features. Transaction fees are billed to, and collected directly from, the merchant and are considered to be earned at the time of the merchant’s transaction with the consumer. We also may earn a specified interchange fee in connection with purchases in which payments are processed through a credit card payment network.
ServicingTransaction fees revenue decreased 3% during 2021 compared to 2020 due to a decrease in transaction fee rate (transaction fees earned as a percentage of transaction volume), partially offset by an increase in transaction volume of 6% year over year.
The transaction fee rate was 6.47% during 2021 compared to 7.13% during 2020. The year over year transaction fee rate decrease is primarily related to the mix of promotional terms of loans originated on our platform. Loans with lower interest rates, longer stated maturities and other.longer promotional periods generally carry relatively higher transaction fee rates. Conversely, loans with higher interest rates, shorter stated terms and shorter promotional periods generally carry relatively lower transaction fee rates. In addition, the mix of loans offered by merchants generally varies by merchant category, and is dependent on merchant and consumer preference. Therefore, shifts in merchant mix have a direct impact on our transaction fee rates. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, our merchants offered a larger proportion of promotional loans, which resulted in the upward shift in the transaction fee rate in 2020 compared to 2019. In 2021, we have experienced a reversion to pre-pandemic levels as it relates to the mix of loans. In addition, the mix of loans offered by merchants generally varies by merchant category, and is dependent on merchant and consumer preference.
Servicing
We earn a specified servicing fee fromfor providing professional services to manage loan portfolios on behalf of our Bank Partners. We are entitled to collectPartners, including servicing fees as part of participated loans for a Bank Partner that retains the loan and servicing agreements with our Bank Partners, whichrights. Servicing fees are paid monthly and are typically based upon an annual fixed percentage of the average outstanding loan portfolio balance. Servicing revenue is also impacted by the fair value change in our servicing assets and liabilities associated with the servicing arrangements with our Bank Partners. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional information on our servicing assets and liabilities.
The following table presents servicing revenue earned from servicing fees and the fair value change in servicing assets included in our servicing revenue. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Servicing fee | | $ | 111,781 | | | $ | 115,110 | |
| Fair value change in servicing assets and liabilities | | 12,452 | | | 345 | |
| Total servicing revenue | | $ | 124,233 | | | $ | 115,455 | |
During 2021, servicing revenue increased $8.8 million, or 8%, compared to 2020, which was primarily attributable to the net increase in the fair value of servicing assets and liabilities related to our Bank Partner servicing
arrangements in 2021 of $12.5 million in 2021, as compared to $0.3 million in 2020. The fair value increase reflects changes in balances of Bank partner portfolios and the respective applicable fees during the year as well as significant improvements in credit forecasts since 2020. The servicing fee decrease reflects a 2021 average servicing fee rate of 1.18% compared to 1.26% in 2020, primarily attributable to the diversification of our funding strategy toward capital markets transactions with servicing fees, on average, marginally lower than under our Bank Partner servicing arrangements.
Interest and other
We earn interest income from loan portfolio balance.receivables held for sale, including loan participations purchased by the Warehouse SPV. The amount of interest for each period depends on the average level of loan participations and the mix of loans owned for each period. During 2021, interest and other revenue decreased $3.0 million compared to 2020, primarily due to the significant reduction in loan receivables held for sale on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021.
Cost of Revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Origination related | | $ | 21,354 | | | $ | 26,044 | |
| Servicing related | | 49,939 | | | 53,208 | |
| Fair value change in FCR liability | | 72,443 | | | 147,018 | |
| Loan and loan participation sales costs | | 52,565 | | | 72,357 | |
| Mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations | | 2,603 | | | 10,655 | |
| Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense) | | $ | 198,904 | | | $ | 309,282 | |
Origination and servicing costs.related
Origination and servicingrelated expenses typically include costs consist primarily of compensation and benefits related to activities such asassociated with our customer service staff that supports Bank Partner loan originations, credit and merchant underwriting. In addition, we incuridentity verification, loan document delivery, transaction processing fees on each transaction processed by our third-party transaction processor costs for printing and postage related to consumer statement production, customer protection expenses when we compensateindemnify a Bank Partner if a merchant does not fulfill its obligation to the end consumer,consumer.
During 2021, origination related expenses decreased 18% compared to 2020, largely driven by a decrease in customer protection expenses, which were $3.6 million lower compared to 2020. In addition, we experienced operational efficiencies in loan processing, with origination related expenses as a percent of transaction volume decreasing to 0.36% in 2021 from 0.47% in 2020.
Servicing related
Servicing related expenses are primarily reflective of the cost of our personnel (including dedicated call center personnel) and other costsprinting and postage related to consumer application review.statement production.
During 2021, servicing related expenses decreased 6% compared to 2020 due to lower delinquency rates, which reduce collection costs. Servicing related expenses as a percent of our average loan servicing portfolio were 0.53% and 0.57% for the years ended December 31, 2021and2020, respectively.
Fair value change in FCR liability. Deferred interest loan products, which historically have represented a substantial portion of our transaction volume, have a feature whereby the consumer borrower is provided a promotional period to repay the loan principal balance in full without incurring finance charges. We bill interest each month to the consumer throughout the promotional period and, if the loan is repaid in full before the end of the promotional period, the interest billed to the consumer is reversed. liability
Under the terms of our contracts with our Bank Partners, we are obligated to remit this reversed billed interest to the Bank Partners.
The monthly billing of interest on deferred interest loan products triggers a potential future FCR liability for us, which qualifies as an embedded derivative. Fair value changes reflect the increase or decrease in our expected obligation to return billed interest to our Bank Partners in the future. Fair value changes in the FCR liability are partially offset by the receipt of monthlyreceive incentive payments from Bank Partners during the promotional period, which vary from month to month.
Our total FCR liability is recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and is calculated at the end of each period as the following:
FCR liability beginning balance, plus
Receipts, which are comprised of: (i) incentive payments from Bank Partners, (ii) cash proceeds from transfers of rights to Charged-Off Receivables, and (iii) recoveriesbased on previously charged-off loans not yet transferred. Incentive payments from Bank Partners are the surplus of finance charges billed to borrowers over an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized net credit losses. Transfers of Charged-Off Receivables are cashWe reduce these incentive payments we receive from third parties and Bank Partners for recovery interests in previously charged-off Bank Partner loans; minus
Settlements, which represent the remittancebased on estimated future reversals of previously billed but uncollected finance charges for loansinterest on deferred interest loan products that were paid off within the promotional period, pluswe will be obligated to remit to Bank Partners in future periods. These estimated future reversals are recorded as a liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Fair value change in FCR liability, which is indicative of future expected settlements not collected in receipts, equals
FCR liability ending balance.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional information on our FCRfinance charge reversal liability, including a qualitative discussion of the impact to the fair value of our FCR liability
resulting from changes in the finance charge reversal rate and discount rate. See Part II, Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk—Credit risk” for additional information on
The following table reconciles the sensitivity of the fair valuebeginning and ending measurements of our FCR liability and highlights the activity that drove the fair value change in FCR liability included in our cost of revenue. With the implementation of our whole loan and loan participation sales program in mid-2020, we experienced a decline in deferred interest loans in Bank Partner portfolios, primarily attributable to the diversification of our funding strategy and purchases of participations in deferred interest loans by the Warehouse SPV. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 185,134 | | | $ | 206,035 | |
Receipts(1) | | 223,650 | | | 215,049 | |
Settlements(2) | | (337,698) | | | (382,968) | |
Fair value change in FCR liability(3) | | 72,443 | | | 147,018 | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 143,529 | | | $ | 185,134 | |
(1)Includes: (i) incentive payments from Bank Partners, which is the surplus of finance charges billed to borrowers over an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized net credit losses.losses and (ii) cash received from recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. We consider all monthly incentive payments from Bank Partners during the period to be related to billed finance charges on deferred interest products until monthly incentive payments exceed total billed finance charges on deferred products, which did not occur during the periods presented.
Operating Expenses(2)Represents the reversal of previously billed finance charges associated with deferred payment loan principal balances that were repaid within the promotional period and includes billed finance charges not yet collected on loan participations purchased by the Warehouse SPV of $20.1 million and $28.8 million, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, which were not yet collected and subject to a potential future finance charge reversal at the time of purchase. These amounts were paid to the Bank Partner in full as of the participation purchase dates.
(3)A fair value adjustment is made based on the expected reversal percentage of billed finance charges (expected settlements), which is estimated at each reporting date. The fair value adjustment is recognized in cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Further detail regarding our receipts is provided below for the years indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Incentive payments | | $ | 191,858 | | | $ | 198,570 | |
| | | | |
Recoveries on unsold charged-off receivables(1) | | 31,792 | | | 16,479 | |
| Total receipts | | $ | 223,650 | | | $ | 215,049 | |
(1)Represents recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. We collected recoveries on previously charged-off and transferred Bank Partner loans on behalf of our charged-off receivables investors of $20.1 million and $22.7 million during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These collected recoveries are excluded from receipts, as they do not impact our fair value change in FCR liability.
The decrease of $74.6 million, or 51%, in the fair value change in FCR liability recognized in cost of revenue during 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily a function of a lower balance of deferred interest loans subject to FCR as a result of loan prepayments and our funding diversification that began in mid-2020.
Loan and loan participation sales costs
Loan and loan participation sales costs primarily include interest expense on the Warehouse Facility, realized gains and losses on sold participations, changes in lower of cost or fair value adjustments on currently owned Warehouse Loan Participations, certain fees and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs incurred in connection with obtaining the Warehouse Facility.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, loan and loan participation sales costs were $52.6 million and $72.4 million, respectively, inclusive of realized losses of $40.0 million and $57.0 million, respectively, on Warehouse Loan Participations sold. The lower cost in 2021 reflects an increase in the price for loan products, the mix of loans, and the level of Warehouse Loan Participations held for sale by the Company.
Mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations
The mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations reflects the changes in the fair value in the embedded derivative for loan participation commitments and are recognized as a mark-to-market in cost of revenue for the period.
While our Bank Partner funding costs are recognized over the life of the loan, the fair value adjustments on Warehouse Loan Participations and sales facilitation obligations are recognized in the period of the purchase of the loan participations by the Warehouse SPV or entering into the loan participation commitment. Thus, the fair value adjustments will create a benefit in the form of reducing Bank Partner funding costs over the life of the loan.
During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the mark-to-market on sales facilitation obligations were $2.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further information.
Compensation and benefits.benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses primarily consist of salaries, benefits and share-based compensation for all cost centers not already included in cost of revenue, such as information technology, sales and marketing, product management and all overhead related activities.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses, which excludeDuring 2021, compensation and benefits expense increased $3.4 million, or 4%, compared to 2020 as a result of higher salary expense of $2.3 million, a $0.7 million decrease in capitalized IT costs during the period, and an increase in share-based compensation expense of $0.6 million.
Property, office and technology
Property, office and technology expenses primarily relate to technology, telecommunications and third party rent expense. These costs also include maintenance and security expenses associated with our facilities.
During 2021, property, office and technology expense increased $1.4 million compared to 2020, primarily due to an increase in software, hardware and hosting costs.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense is related to capitalizable computer hardware, furniture and leasehold improvements, as well as software, which is primarily internally developed. Computer hardware is depreciated over three years, software is amortized over three years, furniture is depreciated over five years and leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the expected life of the asset or the remaining lease term.
During 2021, depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.7 million, or 24%, compared to 2020 primarily driven by increases over time in capitalized internally-developed software.
Sales, general and administrative
Sales, general and administrative expenses primarily consist of legal, accounting, consulting and other professional services, recruiting, non-sales and marketing travel costs and promotional activities and travel related expenses.activities. The majority of our sales and marketing spend is “business-to-business” related, as we primarily attract new merchants to our program through trade shows, on-site visits with prospective merchants and other means.
Property, officeDuring 2021, sales, general and technology. Property, officeadministrative expense decreased $5.0 million, or 12%, compared to 2020 predominantly due to a decrease of $8.0 million in provision for losses related to loan receivables held for sale. The lower provision was directly related to the $566.1 million decrease in loan receivables held for sale. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in legal and technology expensesregulatory costs of $3.0 million.
Financial guarantee expense (benefit)
Financial guarantee expense (benefit) primarily relate to technology, telecommunicationsconsists of changes in our non-cash charges and third party rent expense. These costs also include maintenance and security expensesactual cash escrow used by Bank Partners. Upon our adoption of the provisions of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, our financial guarantee liability associated with our facilities.escrow arrangements with our Bank Partners was recognized in accordance
with ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses ("CECL"). Changes in the financial guarantee liability each period as measured under CECL are recorded as non-cash charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2021, the Company recognized a financial guarantee benefit of $15.2 million, compared to financial guarantee expense of $5.0 million in 2020. The financial guarantee benefit recognized in 2021 is primarily due to an improved forecast for future charge-offs and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense is related to capitalizable computer hardware, furniture and leasehold improvements,accelerated prepayments on loans within our Bank Partner portfolios, as well as software,our funding diversification which is primarily internally developed. Computer hardware and softwareresulted in a larger portion of our transaction volumes in 2021 being sold as loan participations into alternative structures that are expensed over three years, furniture is expensed over five years, and leasehold improvements are expensed overnot subject to the shorterfinancial guarantees of our Bank Partner portfolios. In 2020, financial guarantee expense was impacted by the onset of the expected lifeCOVID-19 pandemic and the related increased expectations of Bank Partner loan portfolios. See Note 1 and Note 14 to the asset orConsolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 for additional information regarding the remaining lease term.measurement of our financial guarantees under the new standard.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses primarily consist ofMerger-related costs
Merger-related costs include legal accounting, consulting and other professional services recruiting and non-sales and marketing travel costs, as well as expenses related to our financial guarantee.the pending merger with Goldman Sachs, and totaled $11.7 million during 2021. For more information on the pending merger, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8.
Related party expenses.
Related party expenses, on a recurring basis, primarily consist of rent expense, as we lease one office space from a related party. In addition, we have made equity and transaction-based payments to certainDuring 2021, related parties and have professional services agreements with related parties.
Results of Operations Summary
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Variance |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | $ Change | | % Change | | $ Change | | % Change |
| Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transaction fees | $ | 348,904 |
| | $ | 278,958 |
| | $ | 228,446 |
| | $ | 69,946 |
| | 25 | % | | $ | 50,512 |
| | 22 | % |
| Servicing and other | 65,769 |
| | 46,929 |
| | 35,419 |
| | 18,840 |
| | 40 | % | | 11,510 |
| | 32 | % |
| Total revenue | 414,673 |
| | 325,887 |
| | 263,865 |
| | 88,786 |
| | 27 | % | | 62,022 |
| | 24 | % |
| Costs and expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) | 160,439 |
| | 89,708 |
| | 79,145 |
| | 70,731 |
| | 79 | % | | 10,563 |
| | 13 | % |
| Compensation and benefits | 62,360 |
| | 54,650 |
| | 39,836 |
| | 7,710 |
| | 14 | % | | 14,814 |
| | 37 | % |
| Sales and marketing | 3,781 |
| | 2,198 |
| | 1,085 |
| | 1,583 |
| | 72 | % | | 1,113 |
| | 103 | % |
| Property, office and technology | 13,199 |
| | 10,062 |
| | 8,000 |
| | 3,137 |
| | 31 | % | | 2,062 |
| | 26 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,478 |
| | 3,983 |
| | 3,708 |
| | 495 |
| | 12 | % | | 275 |
| | 7 | % |
| General and administrative | 15,414 |
| | 14,876 |
| | 10,602 |
| | 538 |
| | 4 | % | | 4,274 |
| | 40 | % |
| Related party expenses | 2,212 |
| | 4,811 |
| | 1,678 |
| | (2,599 | ) | | (54 | )% | | 3,133 |
| | 187 | % |
| Total costs and expenses | 261,883 |
| | 180,288 |
| | 144,054 |
| | 81,595 |
| | 45 | % | | 36,234 |
| | 25 | % |
| Operating profit | 152,790 |
| | 145,599 |
| | 119,811 |
| | 7,191 |
| | 5 | % | | 25,788 |
| | 22 | % |
| Other income/(expense), net | (19,276 | ) | | (6,931 | ) | | 4,653 |
| | (12,345 | ) | | 178 | % | | (11,584 | ) | | (249 | )% |
| Income before income tax expense | 133,514 |
| | 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
| | (5,154 | ) | | (4 | )% | | 14,204 |
| | 11 | % |
| Income tax expense | 5,534 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,534 |
| | N/A |
| | — |
| | — | % |
| Net income | $ | 127,980 |
| | $ | 138,668 |
| | $ | 124,464 |
| | $ | (10,688 | ) | | (8 | )% | | $ | 14,204 |
| | 11 | % |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 103,724 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | $ | 24,256 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earnings per share of Class A common stock(1) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.43 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.41 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
(1)
| Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock are applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for further information.
|
Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
Total Revenue
2018 vs. 2017. Total revenueparty expenses increased during the year ended December 31, 2018$36 thousand, or 2%, compared to 20172020.
Other income (expense), net
The $7.2 million, or 32%, increase in other expense, net during 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to an increase in transaction fees. During the year ended December 31, 2018, transaction volumefollowing:
Interest and dividend income decreased $0.6 million during 2021, while interest expense increased by 34% compared to 2017. The impact of higher transaction volume was offset by a decrease in transaction fees earned per dollar originated to 6.94%$1.2 million, or 5%, during the year ended December 31, 2018 from 7.40% during 2017. More recently, our transaction fee rate increased to 7.11% in the fourth quarter of 2018 from 6.91% in the third quarter of 2018.
The period over period transaction fee rate decline is related to the types of loans originated on our platform. Loans with lower interest rates generally carry relatively higher transaction fee rates. Conversely, loans with higher interest rates generally carry relatively lower transaction fee rates. The mix of loans offered by merchants generally varies by merchant category, and is dependent on merchant and consumer behavior. Therefore, shifts in merchant mix have a direct impact on our transaction fee rates. During the year ended December 31, 2018
relative to 2017, there was a shift in loan originations from lower to higher annual percentage yields and shifts in merchant mix, which resulted in the decrease in transaction fees earned per dollar originated.
The increase in servicing and other revenue was primarily attributable to the 36%increase in our loan servicing portfolio. We earn fixed servicing fees from our Bank Partners on our loan servicing portfolio.
2017 vs. 2016. Total revenue increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 20162021, primarily due to an increase in transaction fees. During the year ended December 31, 2017, transaction volume increased by 31% compared to 2016. The impact ofa higher transaction volume was offset by a decrease in transaction fees earned per dollar originated to 7.40% during the year ended December 31, 2017 from 7.93% during 2016, which was due to similar factors as outlined in the foregoing 2018 vs. 2017 variance discussion.
The increase in servicing and other revenue was primarily attributable to the 41% increase in our loan servicing portfolio.
Cost of Revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Origination related | | $ | 28,080 |
| | $ | 21,292 |
| | $ | 19,094 |
|
| Servicing related | | 35,481 |
| | 25,121 |
| | 18,548 |
|
| Fair value change in FCR liability | | 96,878 |
| | 43,295 |
| | 41,503 |
|
| Total cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense) | | $ | 160,439 |
| | $ | 89,708 |
| | $ | 79,145 |
|
Origination related
Origination related costs typically include expenses related to our customer service staff that supports Bank Partner loan originations, credit and identity verification, loan document delivery, transaction processing and customer protection expenses.
2018 vs. 2017. Origination related expenses increased by 32% during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, which supported our 34% year over year transaction volume growth. The drivers of the increase in origination related expenses primarily related to customer protection expenses (which are recognized when the Company determines that a merchant did not fulfill its obligation to the end consumer and compensates a Bank Partner for the applicable portion of the loan principal balance), underwriting expenses, transaction processing expenses and customer service staff expenses.
2017 vs. 2016. Origination related expenses increased by 12% during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. Notable increases period over period related to transaction processing expenses of $0.6 million and underwriting expenses of $0.4 million.
Servicing related
These costs are primarily reflective of the costaverage balance of our personnel (including dedicated call center personnel), printingterm loan in 2021, as it was amended and postage.
2018 vs. 2017upsized in June 2020 (the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement). Servicing related expenses increased by 41% during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, which supported our 36% loan servicing portfolio growth.
2017 vs. 2016. Servicing related expenses increased by 35% during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016, in line with our 41% loan servicing portfolio growth.
Fair value change in FCR liability
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending measurements of our FCR liability and highlights the activity that drove the fair value change in FCR liability included in our cost of revenue.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 94,148 |
| | $ | 68,064 |
| | $ | 49,459 |
|
| Receipts | | 129,153 |
| | 109,818 |
| | 79,508 |
|
| Settlements | | (181,590 | ) | | (127,029 | ) | | (102,406 | ) |
| Fair value changes recognized in cost of revenue | | 96,878 |
| | 43,295 |
| | 41,503 |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 138,589 |
| | $ | 94,148 |
| | $ | 68,064 |
|
Further detail regarding our receipts is provided below for the years indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Incentive payments(1) | | $ | 99,368 |
| | $ | 83,189 |
| | $ | 79,508 |
|
| Proceeds from Charged-Off Receivables transfers | | 26,692 |
| | 18,968 |
| | — |
|
Recoveries on unsold charged-off receivables(2) | | 3,093 |
| | 7,661 |
| | — |
|
Total receipts(3) | | $ | 129,153 |
| | $ | 109,818 |
| | $ | 79,508 |
|
| |
(1)
| Excludes certain recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans, which are presented within the "recoveries on unsold charged-off receivables" line item within this tabular disclosure. |
| |
(2)
| Represents recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. Prior to 2017, recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans were included in incentive payments. |
| |
(3)
| During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we collected recoveries on previously charged-off and transferred Bank Partner loans of $14,802 and $2,966, respectively, on behalf of our Charged-Off Receivables investors, which are excluded from receipts, as they do not impact our fair value change in FCR liability. We did not have any transfers of Charged-Off Receivables during 2016.
|
2018 vs. 2017. The $53.6 million, or 124%, increase in the fair value change in FCR liability recognized in cost of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily a function of deferred interest product finance charges outpacing receipts. Billed finance charges on loans in promotional status totaled $173.3 million as of December 31, 2018 compared to $115.5 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of 50%. Comparatively, receipts of $129.2 million during 2018 increased only 18% from $109.8 million during 2017. The higher growth rate in deferred interest product finance charges has led to a material change in expense period over period. Receipts did not rise proportionally with deferred interest billed finance charges primarily because of an increase in Bank Partner portfolio credit losses and an increase in the agreed upon Bank Partner portfolio yield in 2018 relative to 2017 associated with rising interest rates.
2017 vs. 2016. The $1.8 million, or 4%, increase in the fair value change in FCR liability recognized in cost of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 was reflective of receipts keeping pace with deferred interest product finance charges. As of December 31, 2017, we had $115.5 million of billed finance charges on loans in promotional status, an increase of $32.0 million, or 38%, compared to $83.5 million as of December 31, 2016. FCR related receipts were $109.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $30.3 million, or 38%, compared to 2016. A portion of the increase was related to cash proceeds from transfers of Charged-Off Receivables of $19.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. We did not have any such transfers during 2016. The remaining increase in receipts was primarily attributable to incentive payments from Bank Partners, which were driven by growth in our loan servicing portfolio.
Compensation and benefits
2018 vs. 2017. Compensation and benefits expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to increased headcount. Headcount for employees not included in cost of revenue averaged 420 in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 346 in 2017, an increase of 21%. The headcount
effect was partially offset by an incremental expense benefit of $2.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 due to an increase in capitalized internally-developed software.
2017 vs. 2016. Compensation and benefits expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to increased headcount. Headcount for employees not included in cost of revenue averaged 346 in the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 263 in 2016, an increase of 32%.
Share-based compensation expense is included in compensation and benefits expense. See Note 117 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 for details of our share-based compensation awards, including unrecognized compensation costs as of December 31, 2018, and the weighted average remaining service period over which those costs will be recognized, which will impact compensation and benefits expense in future periods.
Sales and marketing
These expenditures reflect our continued efforts to increase brand recognition and communicate our program benefits to new and prospective merchants, and do not include compensation related items.
2018 vs. 2017. Sales and marketing expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to an increase in trade show attendance and advertising fees, as well as sales and marketing related travel expenses.
2017 vs. 2016. Sales and marketing expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to an increase in trade show attendance and travel expenses and expenses unique to 2017 related to increased digital marketing efforts.
Property, office and technology
2018 vs. 2017. Property, office and technology expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by increases of $1.7 million in hosting and software subscriptions, licensing, maintenance and support costs and $1.2 million associated with technology contractor and consulting expense.
2017 vs. 2016. Property, office and technology expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by increases of $1.4 million in hosting and software licensing and subscription costs, $0.3 million in external software development and consulting and $0.2 million in rent expense.
Depreciation and amortization
2018 vs. 2017. Depreciation and amortization expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by increases over time in capitalized internally-developed software and increases over time in depreciation expense from our growing infrastructure needs.
2017 vs. 2016. Depreciation and amortization expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by increases in computer hardware and leasehold improvement spend to support our growing infrastructure needs.
General and administrative
2018 vs. 2017. General and administrative expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily related to $1.1 million in third party costs, including debt arrangement costs, associated with the amendment of our Credit Agreement (as defined below) incurred during 2018 and increased bad debt expense associated with our transaction fees of $0.5 million. In addition, we had increases in accounting, advisory, legal and insurance costs of $2.1 million attributable to the costs of the Reorganization Transactions and being a public company.
The above 2018 increases were offset by $2.0 million in financial advisory fees unique to 2017 in connection with increasing one of our Bank Partner funding commitments, as well as a $1.2 million decrease in financial guarantee expense associated with our Bank Partner relationships.
2017 vs. 2016. General and administrative expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 due in part to a $1.0 million increase in financial advisory fees paid in connection with increasing one of our Bank Partner funding commitments. Further, an increase of $2.8 million year over year was attributable to legal and accounting fees primarily incurred in preparation of becoming a public company. Lastly, financial guarantee expense related to our Bank Partner relationships increased $2.0 million year over year due to declines in Bank Partner loan credit performance. These costs were offset by a decrease in compliance costs primarily related to a $1.0 million one-time state licensing requirement in 2016.
Related party expenses
2018 vs. 2017. Related party expense decreased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily driven by $2.6 million in fees incurred during 2017 to pay an affiliate of one of the members of the GS Holdings board of managers in connection with finalizing our August 2017 term loan transaction. These costs were not directly attributable to the term loan and, therefore, were expensed as incurred, rather than deferred against the term loan balance.
2017 vs. 2016. Related party expense increased during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 primarily driven by the aforementioned $2.6 million in fees due to an affiliate of one of the members of the GS Holdings board of managers in connection with finalizing our August 2017 term loan transaction. Further, rent expense increased $0.4 million related to an increase in the amount of space that we lease from a related party to accommodate our growing workforce.
Other income/(expense), net
2018 vs. 2017. The $12.3 million increase in total other expense, net during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017, was primarily due to the below.
Interest expense increased $16.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to a full year of interest expense incurred in 2018 on our term loan compared to approximately four months of interest in 2017, as our term loan was originally established in August 2017 and was amended in March 2018.
Interest and dividend income increased $0.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 due to higher average interest and dividend earning cash and cash equivalents balances, which resulted in higher income of $1.6 million year over year. This increase was partially offset by lower loan receivables held for sale interest income of $0.7 million year over year, which primarily resulted from a lower average gross balance of loan receivables held for sale, as we had higher sales of loan receivables held for sale during 2018.
Other losses declined $2.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to $0.9 million lower loan receivables held for sale charge-off expense and $0.5 million lower losses on the sale of loan receivables held for sale during 2018 compared to 2017. Further, we had $1.1 million less fair value adjustments on our servicing liabilities in 2018.
2017 vs. 2016. The change from $4.7 million of other income during the year ended December 31, 2016 to $6.9 million of other expense during 2017 was largely driven by interest expense of $7.5 million incurred in 2017 related to the term loan, which was established in 2017, and the Credit Facility (as defined below), which was both established and terminated in 2017. The $2.1 million decrease in interest income for 2017 compared to 2016 was largely driven by a lower average balance of loan receivables held for sale combined with lower average annual percentage yield. Further, the $1.9 million increase in other losses was primarily driven by a loss of $2.1 million in 2017 related to the impacts of the initial recognition of, and subsequent fair value changes in, our servicing liabilities associated with transfers of Charged-Off Receivables, which was not relevant to the 2016 period.
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements inPart II, Item 8 for additional information regarding our borrowings.
Tax expense
PriorOther losses were $3.8 million during 2021, primarily related to a net loss related to our interest rate swap of $6.8 million, partially offset by the change in fair value of our servicing liabilities of $1.3 million and other gains of $1.5 million. During 2020, other gains were $1.6 million and primarily related to the Reorganization Transactionsfair value change in servicing liabilities of $1.8 million and other gains of $1.5 million, partially offset by the IPO, the Company was not subject to corporate income taxation and, thus, did not have any corporate incomeremeasurement of our tax receivable agreement liability of $1.4 million.
Income tax expense in 2017 and 2016. Therefore, comparisons of the year ended December 31, 2018 versus 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2017 versus 2016 are not meaningful.(benefit)
The incomeIncome tax expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018 reflects the2021 reflected actual and expected income tax expense of $13.9 million on the net earnings for the entire year related to GreenSky, Inc.'s economic interest in GS Holdings. Expected income tax expense during 2020 was $3.1 million and was offset by a net tax benefit of $1.5 million. The increase in the expected income tax expense was primarily related to the increase in net earnings attributable to GreenSky, Inc.'s economic interest in GS Holdings, for which earnings are subject to U.S. federal and state corporate taxation.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
PriorNet income attributable to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, we did not account for noncontrolling interests and, thus, there was no noncontrolling interest in 2017 and 2016. Therefore, comparisons of the year ended December 31, 2018 versus 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2017 versus 2016 are not meaningful. Beginning on May 24, 2018, we attributedduring 2021 reflects income attributable to the Continuing LLC Members for the period based on their economicweighted average ownership interest in GS Holdings, which after adjusting for non-vested units was 70.0% as56.9% in 2021.
Financial Condition Summary
The following table presents summarized audited consolidated balance sheet data as of the dates indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 303,390 |
| | $ | 224,614 |
| | 35 | % |
| Restricted cash | 155,109 |
| | 129,224 |
| | 20 | % |
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | 2,876 |
| | 73,606 |
| | (96 | )% |
| Accounts receivable, net | 15,400 |
| | 18,358 |
| | (16 | )% |
| Related party receivables | 142 |
| | 218 |
| | (35 | )% |
| Property, equipment and software, net | 10,232 |
| | 7,848 |
| | 30 | % |
| Deferred tax assets, net | 306,979 |
| | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Other assets | 8,777 |
| | 9,021 |
| | (3 | )% |
| Total assets | $ | 802,905 |
| | $ | 462,889 |
| | 73 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 5,357 |
| | $ | 6,845 |
| | (22 | )% |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 8,484 |
| | 7,677 |
| | 11 | % |
| Other accrued expenses | 1,015 |
| | 1,606 |
| | (37 | )% |
| Finance charge reversal liability | 138,589 |
| | 94,148 |
| | 47 | % |
| Term loan | 386,822 |
| | 338,263 |
| | 14 | % |
| Tax receivable agreement liability | 260,901 |
| | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Related party liabilities | 825 |
| | 1,548 |
| | (47 | )% |
| Other liabilities | 35,677 |
| | 38,841 |
| | (8 | )% |
| Total liabilities | 837,670 |
| | 488,928 |
| | 71 | % |
| | | | | | |
| Total temporary equity | — |
| | 430,348 |
| | N/A |
|
| Total permanent equity (deficit) | (34,765 | ) | | (456,387 | ) | | 92 | % |
| Total liabilities, temporary equity and permanent equity (deficit) | $ | 802,905 |
| | $ | 462,889 |
| | 73 | % |
Changes in the composition and balance of our assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20182021 compared to December 31, 20172020 were principally attributable to cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, loan receivables held for sale, our term loan and the impacts of the TRA and the FCR liabilities. The changefollowing:
•a $84.8 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash is discussed withincash. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources," which appears later withinResources" in this Item 7.7 for further discussion of our cash flow activity;
Loan receivables held for sale decreased primarily due to four sales during the year ended December 31, 2018 totaling $139.0•a $566.1 million and was further reduced by customer payments of $22.0 million. These decreases were partially offset by purchases ofdecrease in loan receivables held for sale, net, primarily due to the sale of $93.2 million.Warehouse Loan Participations previously purchased by the Warehouse SPV during the year ended December 31, 2021;
The•a $100.4 million increase in deferred tax assets, was primarilynet, as a result of exchanges of Holdco Units by Continuing LLC Members;
•a $41.6 million decrease in the Company having recognized a net deferred tax asset associated with the basis difference in our investment in GS Holdings in connection with the IPO, Reorganization Transactions and Class B common stock exchange activity. During the year ended December 31,
2018, we also recognized deferred tax assets related to additional tax basis increases generated from expected future payments under our TRA (as discussed in "Liquidity and Capital Resources") and related deductions for imputed interest on such payments. Lastly, the deferred tax asset was reduced by income tax expense of $5.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Total liabilities increased by $348.7 million,FCR liability primarily due to a tax receivable agreement liability of $260.9 million associated with the deferred tax asset discussed above, the $50.1 million impact of the modification of our term loan in March 2018, and an increase in our FCR liability of $44.4 million. The FCR liability increase is indicative of an increasedecline in deferred interest loans in Bank Partner portfolios attributable to the diversification of our funding strategy and sales of loan originations in 2018 compared to 2017 and of deferred interest loan finance charges outpacing receipts during 2018 relative to 2017.participations. This activity is analyzed in further detail throughout this Item 7.7;
•a $27.8 million decrease in our financial guarantee liability primarily driven by (i) the credit performance of the Bank Partner portfolios in 2021 and (ii) the improvement in the forecasted credit performance of those portfolios relative to 2020. The changedecrease in temporary equitythe liability also reflects approximately $6.5 million in escrow payments funded during the period related to a Bank Partner that is no longer originating loans under the GreenSky program. There was principallyno utilization of escrow by any Bank Partner that was originating loans under the GreenSky program during 2021;
•a $14.2 million decrease in the interest rate swap liability due to the IPO, which eliminated the redeemable aspectsettlement of the former GS Holdings Class B and C units, as discussed in more detail in interest rate swap. See Note 178 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.8 for additional information;
Total permanent•a $502.8 million decrease in notes payable resulting from repayments of the Warehouse Facility;
•an increase in total equity increasedof $147.3 million primarily due to the effects of the Reorganization Transactions,to: (i) net income of $128.0$117.8 million, and the impact(ii) share-based compensation of deferred$15.7 million, (iii) other comprehensive income, net of tax adjustments of $48.2$12.8 million most of which was related to the exchanges of Holdco Units. These impacts wereassociated with our interest rate swap, partially offset by distributions subsequent to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions of $27.1$15.6 million, and treasury stock purchases of $43.9 million.which were primarily tax distributions.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are a holding company with no operations and depend on our subsidiaries for cash to fund all of our consolidated operations, including future dividend payments, if any. We depend on the payment of distributions by our current subsidiaries, including GS Holdings and GSLLC, which distributions may be restricted as a result of regulatory restrictions, state law regarding distributions by a limited liability company to its members, or contractual agreements, including agreements governing their indebtedness. For a discussion of those restrictions, refer to Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors - Factors–Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure."
In particular, the Credit Facility (as defined below) contains certain negative covenants prohibiting GS Holdings and GSLLC from making cash dividends or distributions unless certain financial tests are met. In addition, while there are exceptions to these prohibitions, such as an exception that permits GS Holdings to pay our operating expenses, these exceptions apply only when there is not ano default under the Credit Facility. We currently anticipate that such restrictions will not impact our ability to meet our cash obligations.
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from operations. Historically, we had some variability in our operating cash flows, primarily due to the timing of purchases and subsequent sales of loan receivables held for sale. Our transaction fees are the most substantial source of our cash flows and follow a relatively predictable, short cash collection cycle. Our short-term liquidity needs primarily include setting aside restricted cash for Bank Partner escrow balances and interest payments on GS Holdings' Credit Facility, which consists of the term loan and revolving loan facility, underfunding the Amended Credit Agreement (collectively referred to asportion of the "Credit Facility"),Warehouse Loan Participations that is not financed by the Warehouse Facility, interest payments and unused fees on the Warehouse Facility, as defined and discussed in "Term loan and revolving loan facility."facility" and "Warehouse Facility" within this Item 7, and sales facilitation obligations as discussed within this Item 7 and Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Further, in the near term, we expect our capital expenditures to be small relative to our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents balance. We do not anticipate any major capital expenditures, nor are there any material trends that would have an unfavorable impact on our capital resources. We currently generate sufficient cash from our operations to meet these short-term needs. In addition, in the future we could use cash from our operations to purchase material amounts of loan receivables held for sale. Finally, we expect to use cash forfor: (i) FCR liability settlements, which are not fully funded by the incentive payments we receive from our Bank Partners.Partners, but for which $53.3 million is held for certain Bank Partners in restricted cash as of December 31, 2021, and for payments under our financial guarantees (see Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion), and (ii) sales facilitation obligations (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion of our sales facilitation obligations). Our $100 million revolving loan facility is also available to supplement our cash flows from operating activities in satisfyingto satisfy our short-term liquidity needs.
The Warehouse Facility finances purchases by the Warehouse SPV of participations in loans originated through the GreenSky program. The Warehouse Facility provides committed financing of $555.0 million and provides financing for a significant portion of the principal balance of such participations and the Company funds the remainder. Although the portion financed by the Warehouse Facility varies based on the composition of the pool of participations being purchased, we expect such portion to be approximately 84% on average. From time to time, the Company purchases participations in loans that have future funding obligations. Such future funding obligations will be funded by the Bank Partner that owns the loan; however, the Company is required to purchase a participation in the future funding amount, which the Company would intend to finance through the Warehouse Facility at similar rates. As of December 31, 2021, the Warehouse SPV held $4.9 million of loan participations and the Warehouse Facility did not have an outstanding loan balance. In addition, the Warehouse SPV may conduct periodic sales of the loan participations or issue asset-backed securities to third parties, which sales or issuances would allow additional purchases to be financed at similar rates.
Our most significant long-term liquidity need involves the repayment of our term loan upon maturity in March 2025, which assuming no prepayments, will have an expected remaining unpaid principal balance of $373 million. We$444.6 million at that time, as well as the repayment of our revolving Warehouse Facility upon maturity in December 2023. Assuming no extended impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we anticipate that our significant cash generated from operations will allow us to service thisthese debt both for quarterly principal repayments and the balloon payment at maturity.obligations. Should operating cash flows be insufficient for this purpose, we will pursue other financing options. We have not made any material commitments for capital expenditures other than those disclosed in ourthe "Contractual Obligations" table later in this Item 7.
Significant Changes in Capital Structure
Recent materialThere were no significant changes in the Company's capital structure included:
2018
In March 2018, we amended certain terms of our 2017 Credit Agreement, replacingduring the original $350.0 million term loan with a $400.0 million term loan, as well as extending the maturity date of the term loan to March 29, 2025, reducing the interest margin to 3.25% per annum and extending the maturity date of the revolving loan facility to March 29, 2023. We contemporaneously settled the outstanding principal balance on the original term loan with the issuance of the modified term loan. As ofyear ended December 31, 2018, we had no borrowings under the $100.0 million revolving loan facility.2021. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information on our borrowings.
In May, 2018, the Company’s Class A common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ Stock Market in connection with its IPO of 43,700,000 shares of its Class A common stock at a public offering price of $23.00 per share, receiving approximately $954.8 million in net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions (but not including other offering costs). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for a detailed discussion of the Reorganization Transactions that immediately preceded the IPO.
In November 2018, we commenced our board-approved $150 million share repurchase program. Through December 31, 2018, we repurchased 4,681,211 shares of Class A common stock in open market transactions at a cost of $43.9 million.
2017
In July 2017, GreenSky, Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation for the purpose of completing an IPO of its Class A common stock and certain Reorganization Transactions in order to carry on the business of GS Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries.
In August 2017, GS Holdings acquired a controlling interest in GSLLC, a Georgia limited liability company, which is an operating entity.
In August 2017, we entered into a $450.0 million Credit Agreement, which provided for a $350.0 million term loan maturing on August 25, 2024 and a $100.0 million revolving loan facility maturing on August 25, 2022. The term loan incurred interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate, plus a margin of 4.00% per annum. As discussed above, this Credit Agreement was amended in 2018. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information on our borrowings.
SeePart II, Item 7A for a discussion of our exposure to market risk, including changes to interest rates, and credit risk.
Cash flows
We prepare our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows using the indirect method, under which we reconcile net income to cash flows provided by operating activities by adjusting net income for those items that impact net income, but may not result in actual cash receipts or payments during the period. The following table provides a summary of our operating, investing and financing cash flows for the periods indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | $ | 630,901 | | | $ | (468,101) | | | $ | 153,327 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (15,602) | | | $ | (14,567) | | | $ | (15,381) | |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | $ | (530,513) | | | $ | 504,481 | | | $ | (150,604) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 256,426 |
| | $ | 160,394 |
| | $ | 121,943 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (6,581 | ) | | $ | (4,135 | ) | | $ | (4,666 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | (145,184 | ) | | $ | (30,535 | ) | | $ | 725 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash totaled $458.5$552.4 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, an increase of $104.7$84.8 million from December 31, 2017.2020. Restricted cash, which had a balance of $155.1$256.0 million as of December 31, 20182021 compared to a balance of $129.2$319.9 million as of December 31, 2017,2020, is not available to us to fund operations or for general corporate purposes. Cash flow activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 consisted of $256.4 million of cash generated from operations, partially offset by $6.6 million of cash used for investing activities and $145.2 million of cash used for financing activities. Financing activity outflows were highlighted by
IPO-funded equity redemptions, repurchases of Class A common stock and distributions to members, offset by proceeds from our IPO and debt refinancing.
Our restricted cash balances as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 were comprised of threefour components: $98.3(i) $164.2 million and $61.5$173.2 million, respectively, which represented the amounts that we have escrowed with Bank Partners
as limited protection to the Bank Partners in the event of excesscertain Bank Partner portfolio credit losses or in the event that the finance charges billed to borrowers do not exceed the sum of an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized credit losses; $49.8(ii) $53.3 million and $41.2$84.6 million, respectively, which represented an additional restricted cash balance that we maintained for certain Bank Partners related to our FCR liability; and $7.0(iii) $33.3 million and $26.5$27.7 million, respectively, which represented certain custodial in-transit loan funding and consumer borrower payments that we were restricted from using for our operations.operations; and (iv) $5.2 million and $34.4 million, respectively, which represented temporarily restricted cash related to collections in connection with Warehouse Loan Participations (which is released from restrictions in accordance with the terms of the Warehouse Facility). The restricted cash balances related to our FCR liability and our custodial balances are not included in our evaluation of restricted cash usage, as these balances are not held as part of a financial guarantee arrangement. See Note 1314 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for additional information on our restricted cash held as escrow with Bank Partners.
Cash provided byby/(used in) operating activities
Year endedEnded December 31, 2018 vs. 2017.2021. Cash flows provided byused in operating activities were $256.4$630.9 million during 2018 compared to $160.4 million during 2017. Net income of $128.0 million and $138.7 million for 2018 and 2017, respectively, was adjusted for certain non-cash items of $18.3 million and $11.0 million, respectively, which were predominantly related to depreciation and amortization, equity-based expense, fair value changes in our servicing liabilities and deferred tax expense.
2021. Primary sources of operating cash during both 2018 and 2017 were2021 were: (i) earnings and increasesother working capital benefits; and (ii) a decrease in our FCR liability of $44.4 million and $26.1 million, respectively. The FCR liability changes were largely related to growth in deferred interest loan originations.
An additional $70.7 million source of cash in 2018 was related to loan receivables held for sale for which our net receipts from customer payments and proceeds fromas a result of completed sales well exceeded our purchases during the year. Comparatively, loan receivables held for sale drove a $32.3 million useperiod. These sources of cash in 2017. These results were driven by $67.0 million higher proceeds received from sales of loan receivables held for sale during 2018 compared to 2017. In addition, the $41.4 million lower purchases of loan receivables held for sale during 2018 compared to 2017 was related to the expansion of our Bank Partner network and modification of their credit policies, enabling them to purchase these receivables.
These changes werepartially offset by a $11.5 million useuses of cash from: (i) previously billed finance charges that reversed in 2018 compared to a $13.6 million source of cash in 2017 related to transaction processing liabilities, which reflects the timing of the settlement of certain custodial in-transit loan fundingperiod; and consumer borrower payments.
Year ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016. Cash flows provided by operating activities were $160.4 million during 2017 compared to $121.9 million in 2016. Net income of $138.7 million and $124.5 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively, was adjusted for certain non-cash items of $11.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively, which were predominantly related to depreciation, amortization, equity-based expense and, for 2017, the fair value change in our servicing(ii) financial guarantee liabilities. Sources of operating cash in 2017 and 2016 were primarily driven by earnings and increases in our FCR liability of $26.1 million and $18.6 million, respectively. The increases in our FCR liability were driven largely by increases in deferred interest loan originations. Further, we had lower purchases of loan receivables held for sale in 2017 as compared to 2016, which was reflective of the expansion of our Bank Partner network and their credit policies. An additional source of cash in 2017 was from Bank Partner settlements.
Cash used in investing activities
Detail of the cash used in investing activities is included below for each year (dollars in millions).
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Software | $ | 5.4 |
| | $ | 2.3 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
| Computer hardware | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 0.2 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 1.7 |
|
| Furniture | 0.2 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Purchases of property, equipment and software | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 4.1 |
| | $ | 4.7 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017. We had net cash used in investing activities of $6.6 million during 2018 compared to $4.1 million in 2017. The higher spend in 2018 was primarily related to an increase in software expenditures, most of which were capitalized costs related to internally-developed software, which consisted primarily of merchant experience enhancements and mobile application development. This activity was partially offset by lower infrastructure expenditures in 2018 compared to 2017, as we did not have any material changes to our leased premises during 2018.
Year ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016. We had net cash used in investing activities of $4.1 million during 2017 compared to $4.7 million during 2016. The higher spend in 2016 was due to more significant spend on computer hardware and leasehold improvements related to the build out of our current corporate headquarters, as well as an additional build out of space at our operations center and technology locations in Georgia. These expenditures were partially offset by higher spend in 2017 on software, which consisted primarily of improvements to our customer payment experience and development of our capability to interact directly with customers.year. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Software | $ | 14,286 | | | $ | 13,607 | | | $ | 12,684 | |
| Computer hardware | 665 | | | 726 | | | 1,184 | |
| Leasehold improvements | 651 | | | 91 | | | 911 | |
| Furniture | — | | | 143 | | | 602 | |
| Purchases of property, equipment and software | $ | 15,602 | | | $ | 14,567 | | | $ | 15,381 | |
Cash provided by (usedby/(used in) financing activities
Our financing activities in the yearsperiods presented consisted of equity and debt related transactions and distributions, including the impact of our IPO and Reorganization Transactions, and equity activities subsequent to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions, which primarily consisted of our purchases of treasury stock. Specifically as it relates to distributions,distributions. GS Holdings makes tax distributions based on the estimated tax payments that its members are expected to have to make during any given period (based upon various tax rate assumptions) and, which are typically are paid in January, April, June and September of each year. Special GS Holdings distributions are also possible, which also occurred in 2018.
Year ended December 31, 2018 vs. 2017. We had net cash used in financing activities of $145.2$530.5 million during 2018 compared to $30.5 million during 2017.2021. In 2018, we contemporaneously settled the $349.1 million outstanding principal balance on2021, our original term loan with the issuance of a $400.0 million modified term loan, net of an original issuance discount of $1.0 million. These net proceeds were offset by distributions of $141.5 million and equity transaction costs of $3.9 million during 2018. An additional significantprimary use of cash in 2018was net repayments on the Warehouse Facility of $41.8$507.5 million was related to our purchaseas a result of treasury stock.sales of loan participations.
The cash used in financing activities during 2017 was primarily related to aggregate special and tax distributions of $561.9 million and $7.9 million of debt issuance costs associated with the original term loan. The significantly higher distributions paid in 2017 compared to 2018 was mostly attributable to a special distribution made from the proceeds from our original term loan in 2017.Borrowings
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional information on our borrowings.
Year ended December 31, 2017 vs. 2016. We had net cash used in financing activities of $30.5 million in 2017 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $0.7 million in 2016. During 2017, proceeds from our term loan of $346.5 million were offset by payment of debt issuance costs of $7.9 million. Further, we made distributions to members of $561.9 million in 2017, of which $490.6 million represented special distributions from available term loan proceeds and distributable cash on hand and $71.3 million represented member tax distributions. Finally, we issued temporary equity that generated net proceeds of $194.5 million in 2017. During
2016, we issued temporary equity that generated net proceeds of $48.2 million. In addition, we made member tax distributions of $46.9 million in 2016.
Borrowings
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements inPart II, Item 8 for further information about our borrowings, including the use of term loan proceeds.proceeds, as well as our interest rate swap.
Term loan and revolving loan facility
On March 29, 2018, GS Holdings amended its August 25, 2017 GS Holdings entered into a Credit Agreement which was amended on March 29, ("2018 ("Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement provides to provide for a $400.0 million term loan, the proceeds of which were used, in large part, to settle the outstanding principal balance on the $350.0 million term loan previously executed under the Credit Agreement in August 2017, and includes a $100.0 million revolving loan facility. The revolving loan facility also includes a $10.0 million letter of credit. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by GS Holdings’ significant subsidiaries, including GSLLC, and areis secured by liens on substantially all of the assets of GS Holdings and the guarantors. Interest on the loans can be based either on a “Eurodollar rate” or a “base rate” and fluctuates dependentdepending upon a “first lien net
leverage ratio.” The 2018 Amended Credit Agreement contains a variety of covenants, certain of which are designed in certain circumstances to limit the ability of GS Holdings to make distributions on, or redeem, its equity interests unless, in general, either (a) its “first lien net leverage ratio” is no greater than 2.00 to 1.00, or (b) the funds used for the payments come from certain sources (such as retained excess cash flow and the issuance of new equity) and its “total net leverage ratio” is no greater than 3.00 to 1.00.interests. In addition, during any period when 25% or more of our revolving facility is utilized, itGS Holdings is required to maintain a “first lien net leverage ratio” no greater than 3.50 to 1.00. There are various exceptions to these restrictions, including, for example, exceptions that enable us to pay our operating expenses and to make certain GS Holdings tax distributions. The $400.0 million term loan matures on March 29, 2025, and the revolving loan facility matures on March 29, 2023.
We did not utilize any ofOn June 10, 2020, we entered into a Second Amendment to our Credit Agreement ("2020 Amended Credit Agreement"), which provided for an additional $75.0 million term loan ("incremental term loan"). The term loan and revolving loan facility under the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement and incremental term loan under the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement are collectively referred to as the "Credit Facility." The modified term loan and the incremental term loan are collectively referred to as the "term loan." The incremental term loan, incurs interest, due monthly in arrears, at an adjusted LIBOR, which represents the one-month LIBOR multiplied by the statutory reserve rate, as defined in the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement, with a 1% LIBOR floor, plus 450 basis points. The incremental term loan has the same security, maturity, principal amortization, prepayment, and covenant terms as the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement, maturing on March 29, 2025.
There was no amount outstanding under our revolving loan facility as of December 31, 2018,2021, which is available to fund future needs of GS Holdings’ business. We also did not draw on our available letter of credit as of December 31, 2021.
Initial CreditWarehouse Facility
In February 2017, we entered into a two-year, $50.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Initial Credit Facility”). The proceeds from borrowings underOn May 11, 2020, the Initial Credit Facility were expected to be used to fund working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. The interest rates payable on borrowings under the Initial Credit Facility were calculated at either an alternate base rate plus a 1.25% per annum margin or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a 2.25% per annum margin. We had the ability to request the issuance of letters of credit under the Initial Credit Facility. We made no borrowings under the Initial Credit Facility. The Initial Credit Facility was terminated in August 2017 when weWarehouse SPV entered into the Warehouse Facility to finance purchases by the Warehouse SPV of 100% participation interests in loans originated through the GreenSky program. The Warehouse Facility initially provided a revolving committed financing of $300 million, and an uncommitted $200 million accordion that was subsequently accessed in July 2020.
On December 18, 2020, the Warehouse Facility was amended ("Amended Warehouse Facility") to increase the amount of the Warehouse Facility’s revolving commitment from $300 million to $555 million, including $500 million under the Class A commitment and $55 million under the Class B commitment. With the addition of the Class B commitment, the advance rate under the Warehouse Facility has generally been approximately 84% (on average) of the principal balance of the purchased participations.
As of December 31, 2021, there was no outstanding loan balance on the Warehouse Facility. The Warehouse Facility is secured by the loan participations held by the Warehouse SPV, and Warehouse Facility Lenders do not have direct recourse to the Company for any loans made under the Warehouse Facility.
Expected Replacement of LIBOR
The use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) will be phased out by mid-2023. LIBOR is currently used as a reference rate for certain of our financial instruments, including our $475.0 million term loan under the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement.Agreement, which is set to mature after the expected phase out of LIBOR. Our Warehouse Facility and the related interest rate cap also include certain rates that are impacted by LIBOR; however, the agreement includes LIBOR transition provisions. We will work with our lenders and counterparties to accommodate any suitable replacement rate where it is not already provided under the terms of the financial instruments and, going forward, we will use suitable alternative reference rates for our financial instruments, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR"). We will continue to assess and plan for how the phase out of LIBOR will affect the Company; however, while the LIBOR transition could adversely affect the Company, we do not currently perceive any material risks and do not expect the impact to be material to the Company.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Our purchase of Holdco Units from the Exchanging Members using a portion of the net proceeds from the IPO, our acquisition of the equity of certain of the Former Corporate Investors, and any future exchanges of Holdco Units for our Class A common stock pursuant to the Exchange Agreement (as such terms are defined in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8) are expected to result in increases in our allocable tax basis in the assets of GS Holdings. These increases in tax basis are expected to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions allocable to us and, therefore, reduce the amount of tax that we otherwise would be required to pay in the future. This increase in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain assets to the extent tax basis is allocated to those assets.
We and GS Holdings entered into a TRATax Receivable Agreement ("TRA") with the "TRA Parties" (which are the(the equity holders of the Former Corporate Investors, the Exchanging Members, the Continuing LLC Members and any other parties receiving benefits under the TRA)TRA, as those parties are defined in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8), whereby we agreed to pay to those parties 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in United States federal, state and local taxes that we realize or are deemed to realize as a result of these increases in tax basis, increases in basis from such payments, and deemed interest deductions arising from such payments.
DueAs a condition to the uncertainty of various factors,Merger Agreement, the likely tax benefits weCompany and certain beneficiaries party to the TRA were required to enter into an amendment to the TRA (the “TRA Amendment”), which TRA Amendment provided that no payments under the TRA will realizebe made following or as a result of our purchase of Holdco Units from the Exchanging Members, our acquisitionconsummation of the equity of certain of the Former Corporate Investors or any future exchanges of Holdco Units for our Class A common stock pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, or the resulting amounts we are likely to pay out to the TRA Parties pursuant to the TRA are also uncertain. However, we expect that such payments will be substantial and may substantially exceed the tax receivable liability of $260.9 million as of December 31, 2018.
Because we are the managing member of GS Holdings, which is the managing member of GSLLC, we have the ability to determine when distributions (other than tax distributions) will be made by GSLLC to GS Holdings and the amount of any such distributions, subject to limitations imposed by applicable law and contractual restrictions (including pursuant to our Amended Credit Agreement or other debt instruments). Any such distributions will be distributed to all holders of Holdco Units, including us, pro rata based on the number of Holdco Units. The cash received from such distributions will first be used by us to satisfy any tax liability and then to make any payments required under the TRA. We expect that such distributions will be sufficient to fund both our tax liability and the required payments under the TRA.Mergers.
Contractual Obligations
Our principal commitments consisted of obligations under our outstanding term loan and operating leases for office facilities. The following table summarizes our commitments to settle contractual obligations in cash as of December 31, 2018.2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | | Less than
1 year | | 1-3
years | | 3-5
years | | More than
5 years |
Term loan(1) | | $ | 458,875 | | | $ | 4,750 | | | $ | 9,500 | | | $ | 444,625 | | | $ | — | |
Interest payments on term loan(2) | | 74,437 | | | 23,223 | | | 45,722 | | | 5,492 | | | — | |
Revolving loan facility fees(3) | | 620 | | | 500 | | | 120 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest payments and fees on Warehouse Facility(4) | | 12,600 | | | 6,300 | | | 6,300 | | | — | | | — | |
Operating leases(5) | | 18,554 | | | 3,813 | | | 4,670 | | | 4,188 | | | 5,883 | |
| Total contractual obligations | | $ | 565,086 | | | $ | 38,586 | | | $ | 66,312 | | | $ | 454,305 | | | $ | 5,883 | |
(1)The principal balance of the term loan is repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter, with the balance due at maturity. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Total | | Less than 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | More than 5 years |
Term loan(1) | | $ | 397,000 |
| | $ | 4,000 |
| | $ | 8,000 |
| | $ | 8,000 |
| | $ | 377,000 |
|
Interest payments on term loan(2) | | 138,658 |
| | 22,820 |
| | 44,947 |
| | 44,024 |
| | 26,867 |
|
Revolving loan facility fees(3) | | 1,590 |
| | 375 |
| | 750 |
| | 465 |
| | — |
|
Operating leases(4) | | 16,984 |
| | 3,871 |
| | 8,246 |
| | 4,325 |
| | 542 |
|
| Total contractual obligations | | $ | 554,232 |
| | $ | 31,066 |
| | $ | 61,943 |
| | $ | 56,814 |
| | $ | 404,409 |
|
| |
(3)Amounts presented reflect a quarterly commitment fee rate of 0.50% per annum, and assume that the entire $100 million revolving loan facility is unused (the conditions that existed as of period end) for the duration of the agreement, which matures on March 29, 2023. (4)Variable interest payments on our Warehouse Facility are calculated based on the applicable Class A and Class B interest rates as of December 31, 2021, and assume that the outstanding balance on the Warehouse Facility as of December 31, 2021 remains outstanding for the duration of the agreement. Warehouse Facility fees are calculated based on a daily unused commitment rate of 0.50% per annum, and assume that the unused commitment balance as of December 31, 2021 remains unused for the duration of the agreement. The Warehouse Facility matures on December 17, 2023. (5)Our operating leases are for office space. Certain of these leases contain provisions for rent escalations and/or lease concessions. Rental payments, as well as any step rent provisions specified in the lease agreements, are aggregated and charged evenly to expense over the lease term. However, amounts included herein do not reflect this accounting treatment, as they represent the future contractual lease cash obligations. (1)
| The principal balance of the term loan is repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter, with the balance due at maturity. |
| |
(2)
| Variable interest payments on our term loan are calculated based on the interest rate as of December 31, 2018 and the scheduled maturity of the underlying term loan. |
| |
(3)
| Amounts presented reflect a quarterly commitment fee rate of 0.375% per annum, and assume that the entire $100 million revolving loan facility is unused (the conditions that existed as of period end) for the duration of the agreement, which matures on March 29, 2023. |
| |
(4)
| Our operating leases are for office space. Certain of these leases contain provisions for rent escalations and/or lease concessions. Rental payments, as well as any step rent provisions specified in the lease agreements, are aggregated and charged evenly to expense over the lease term. However, amounts included herein do not reflect this accounting treatment, as they represent the future contractual lease cash obligations. |
The payments that we may be required to make under the TRA to the TRA Parties may be significant and are not reflected in the contractual obligations table set forth above. Refer to Part I, Item 1A "Risk Factors - Factors–Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure" and to Note 1213 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for additional detail.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2018 or 2017.
Contingencies
From time to time, we may become a party to civil claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. We record a provision for a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated, which requires management judgment. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we did not record any provision for liability. Should any of our estimates or assumptions change or prove to be incorrect, it could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 1314 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for discussion of certain legal proceedings.
proceedings and other contingent matters.
Recently Adopted or Issued Accounting Standards
See “Recently"Recently Adopted Accounting Standards”Standards" and "Accounting Standards Issued, But Not Yet Adopted" in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for additional information.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. Such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those that relate to fair value measurements around our FCR liability and servicing assets and liabilities, the measurement of our financial guarantees, and income taxes. In developing estimates and assumptions, management uses all available information; however, actual results could materially differ because of uncertainties associated with estimating the amounts, timing and likelihood of possible outcomes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our judgments and estimates that are based upon historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. The following is a summary of our most critical accounting estimates, which represent those that involve a higher degree of uncertainty, judgment or complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe to be most critical in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition, and results of operations.operations and cash flows.
Finance charge reversals
WeOur Bank Partners offer certain loan products that have a feature whereby the account holder is provided a promotional period to repay the loan principal balance in full without incurring a finance charge. For these loan products, we bill interest each month throughout the promotional period and, under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners, are obligated to remit this billed interest to the Bank Partners if an account holder pays off the loan balance in full within the promotional period. This obligation is partially offset by the receipt of monthly incentive payments, which vary from month to month, from Bank Partners during the promotional period, which vary from month to month.period. Therefore, the monthly process of billing interest on deferred loan products triggers a potential future FCR liability for us. The FCR component of our Bank Partner contracts qualifies as an embedded derivative.derivative accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
The FCR liability is carried at fair value on a recurring basis in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and is estimated based on historical experience and management’s expectation of future FCR. The FCR liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from unobservable inputs based on our data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants. The FCR liability is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and, as such, changes in its fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Part II, Item 7A for a discussion of our exposure to interest rate risk and credit risk as it relates to our FCR. Our discussion in Item 7A provides a useful sensitivity analysis to help facilitate a further understanding of the impact of our FCR liability on our net income.
Servicing assets and liabilities
The Company assumes a right, obligation, or neither a right nor obligation to service consumer loans each time a loan is originated by a Bank Partner. Additionally, the Company services charged-off receivables to which we transferred our rights to third parties and Bank Partners, but for which we do not charge a servicing fee. The Company identified Bank Partner loans as one class of servicing rights and charged-off receivables as a separate class of servicing rights. In accordance with ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, when we determine that the compensation we receive to service loans is more or less than adequate, we assess the fair value of a servicing asset or liability, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model.
We previously elected the fair value method to measure each class of servicing rights subsequent to initial recognition, as we believe that fair value is a more meaningful measure of our expected right or obligation with respect to these classes of servicing assets or liabilities, respectively. This election is irrevocable for these classes of servicing assets or liabilities. The fair value of our servicing assets associated with Bank Partner loans was $54.9 million and $30.8 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which is recorded within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of our servicing liabilities associated with Bank Partner loans and charged-off receivables was $12.3 million and $2.0 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, which is recorded within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of our servicing assets and liabilities related to our bank partner arrangements are recorded within servicing revenue and changes in the fair value of our servicing liabilities related to charged-off receivables are recorded within other gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The determination of the fair values of our servicing assets and liabilities requires management judgment due to the number of assumptions that underlie the valuation, including: market cost of servicing, discount rate, weighted average remaining life and recovery period. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for a qualitative discussion of how changes in each of these assumptions are generally expected to affect our fair value measures. Our servicing assets and liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary components of the fair values are obtained from unobservable inputs based on peer market data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants to service our Bank Partner loans and transferred charged-off receivables portfolios, for which market data is not available.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we renegotiated certain Bank Partner agreements pursuant to which we agreed to post additional escrow and increase the agreed-upon Bank Partner portfolio yield. In exchange for these considerations, we received an increase in our loan servicing fees from the Bank Partners. We determined that the increase in servicing fees resulted in an increase to the fair value of our servicing assets for these Bank Partners. We also anticipate that, all other factors remaining constant, these increased servicing fees will contribute to lower incentive payments received in future periods from the Bank Partners. Further, the fair value of our servicing assets is determined based on the serviced loan portfolios at the date of measurement and does not take into account potential future loan sales between Bank Partners within our network or between GreenSky and our Bank Partners, institutional investors, or financial institutions. When such transactions occur, they could materially impact the fair value measure of our servicing assets if the contractually specified fixed servicing fees vary between the seller and purchaser.
Financial Guarantees
Under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners, we provide limited protection to the Bank Partners in the event of certain Bank Partner portfolio credit losses or in the event that certain finance charges billed to borrowers do not exceed the sum of an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized credit losses, by holding cash in restricted, interest-bearing escrow accounts in an amount equal to a contractual percentage of the Bank Partners’ monthly originations and month-end outstanding portfolio balance, which represented a weighted average target rate of 2.8% of the total outstanding balance of the relevant Bank Partner portfolio loans as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s maximum exposure under these financial guarantees is contractually limited to the escrow that we establish with each Bank Partner. Cash set aside to meet this requirement is classified as restricted cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and totaled $164.2 million as of December 31, 2021.
Our contracts with our Bank Partners entitle us to incentive payments when the finance charges billed to borrowers exceed the sum of an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized credit losses. This incentive payment varies from month to month, primarily due to the amount of realized credit losses. If credit losses exceed an agreed-upon threshold, we are obligated to make limited payments to our Bank Partners. This obligation represents a financial guarantee in accordance with ASC 460, Guarantees. Under ASC 460, the guarantor undertakes a noncontingent obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guarantee and a contingent obligation to make future payments if the triggering events or conditions under the guarantee arrangements occur.
Effective January 1, 2020, we adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-13, which apply only to the contingent aspect of the guarantee arrangement. Under the new standard, we are required to estimate the expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a present contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the issuer. As applied to our financial guarantee arrangements, we are required to estimate expected credit losses, and the impact of those estimates on our potential escrow payments, for loans within our Bank Partner portfolios that are either funded or approved for funding at the measurement date, but are precluded from including future loan originations by our Bank Partners. Consistent with the modeling of loan losses for any consumer loan portfolio assumed to go into "run-off," our recognized financial guarantee liability under this model represents a significant portion of the contractual escrow established with each Bank Partner. Typically, additional financial guarantee liabilities are recorded as new Bank Partner loans are facilitated, along with a corresponding non-cash charge recorded as financial guarantee expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Historically, our actual cash payments required under the financial guarantee arrangements have been immaterial for our ongoing Bank Partners.
As the terms of our guarantee arrangements are determined contractually with each Bank Partner, we measure our contingent obligation separately for each Bank Partner using a discounted cash flow method based on estimates of the outstanding loan attributes of the Bank Partner's loan servicing portfolio and our expectations of forecasted information, including macroeconomic conditions, over the period that our financial guarantee is expected to be used in a "run-off" scenario. We use our historical experience as a basis for estimating escrow usage and adjust for current conditions or forecasts of future conditions if they are determined to vary from our historical experience. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on our financial guarantees.
For periods prior to January 1, 2020, the contingent aspect of the financial guarantee continues to be presented and disclosed in accordance with legacy guidance in ASC 450, Contingencies. Under this guidance, the contingent aspect of the financial guarantee represented the amount of payments to Bank Partners from the escrow accounts that we expected to be probable of occurring based on Bank Partner portfolio composition and our near-term expectation of credit losses. In estimating the obligation, we considered a variety of factors, including historical experience, management’s expectations of current customer delinquencies converting into Bank Partner portfolio credit losses and recent events and circumstances. The estimated contingent value of the financial guarantee was $131.9 million as of December 31, 2020.
As of December 31, 2021, the estimated value of the escrow financial guarantee was $104.1 million relative to our $164.2 million contractual escrow that was included in our restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2021. Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion of our accounting for financial guarantees.
Income taxes
Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and tax receivable agreement liability reflect management’s best assessment of estimated current and future taxes. Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining the consolidated income tax expense, deferred tax assets and tax receivable agreement liability. Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including projected future taxable income and results of recent operations. In projecting future taxable income, we begin with historical results and incorporate assumptions about the amount of future state and federal pre-tax operating income adjusted for items that do not have tax consequences. The assumptions about future taxable income require significant judgment
and are consistent with the plans and estimates we are using to manage our business.
Refer to Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for additional discussion of our accounting for income taxes.
Loan Receivables Held for Sale
Loan receivables held for sale represent a 100% participation interest in certain loans originated by our Bank Partners under the GreenSky program that the Company subsequently purchases with the intent to sell to a third party at carrying value. Loan receivables held for sale are recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the time a loan receivable is purchased and are subsequently measured at the lower of cost or fair value on an aggregate homogeneous portfolio basis. We apply the market approach, which uses observable prices and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities, to value our loan receivables held for sale. Changes in the fair value of our loan receivables held for sale are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Our loan receivables held for sale are primarily loan participations owned by the Warehouse SPV, which are expected to be sold around or below par to institutional investors, financial institutions and other capital markets investors. Fair value of our loan receivables held for sale is determined based on the anticipated sale price of such participations to third parties. Loan receivables held for sale are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from observable values of loan receivables with similar terms and characteristics.
In May 2020, as part of implementing GreenSky's program to accomplish alternative funding structures, the Company entered into a series of agreements (collectively, the “Facility Bank Partner Agreements”) with an existing Bank Partner, to provide a framework for the programmatic sale of loan participations and whole loans by that Bank Partner to third parties. Under the Facility Bank Partner Agreements, it is contemplated that potential purchasers issue purchase commitments to the Bank Partner. The Company has certain sales facilitation obligations related thereto that qualify as embedded derivatives and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As such, these sales facilitation obligations are recorded at fair value and changes in their respective fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The fair value of sales facilitation obligations is based on the difference between par and the anticipated sale prices of such participations to third parties. As such, the fair value is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from observable values of loan receivables with similar terms and characteristics.
See Part II, Item 7A for a discussion of our exposure to interest rate risk and credit risk as it relates to our loan receivables held for sale. Our discussion in Item 7A provides a useful sensitivity analysis to help facilitate a further understanding of the impact of our loan receivables held for sale on our net income.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK (Dollars in thousands unless otherwise indicated)
We are exposed to market risk, including changes to interest rates, and credit risk. However, regarding interest rate risk, we do not expect changes in interest rates to have a material impact on our ability to finance our cost of capital, given our relatively capital lightcapital-light operating model.
We have established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and control the types of risk to which we are subject. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the Company’s major financial risk exposures and reviewing the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures.
Interest rate risk
Loans originated byin our Bank Partners.Partners' Portfolios. The agreed upon Bank Partner portfolio yield on the loans thatin our Bank Partners originatePartners' portfolios is calculated based upon a margin above a market benchmark at the time of origination. An increase in the market benchmark wouldcould result in an increase in the agreed upon Bank Partner portfolio yield, which impacts future incentive payments and, therefore, cancould negatively impact the future fair value change in our FCR liability. We are able to manage some of the interest rate risk impact on our FCR liability through the types of loan
products that we design and make available tothrough our Bank Partners for fundingprogram (e.g., higher interest rate products, all else equal, result in higher incentive payments). However, increased interest rates may adversely impact the spending levels of our merchants’ customers and their ability and willingness to borrow money. Higher interest rates often lead to higher payment obligations, which may reduce the ability of customers to remain current on their obligations to our Bank Partners and, therefore, lead to increased delinquencies, defaults, customer bankruptcies and charge-offs, and decreasing recoveries, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and also negatively impact the fair value change in FCR liability, which is recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Further, even though we are ablegenerally intend to increase our transaction fee rates or annual percentage rates on loan products in response to rising interest rates, we might not be able to do so rapidly enough (or at all).
Loan receivables held for sale. Changes in United States interest rates affect the interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents and could impact the market value of loan receivables held for sale. Since we typically sell loan receivables held for sale at par to our Bank Partners, which is indicative of our short-term holding period, we do not expect interest rate risk related to loan receivables held for sale to be a material risk to us. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the weighted average age of our loan receivables held for sale based on the origination date relative to the respective reporting date was approximately 13 months and 11 months, respectively. As the carrying value of our loan receivables held for sale was $2.9 million as of December 31, 2018, a hypothetical increase in interest rates would not have a material impact on this balance. As of December 31, 2017, aA hypothetical 100 basis points increase in interest rates may have resulted in a decrease of $2.0$0.1 million and $5.9 million in the carrying value of our loan receivables held for sale.as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. Alternatively, a 100 basis points decrease in interest rates would not have impacted the reported value of our loan receivables held for sale, as they are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
Term loan. Interest rate fluctuations expose our variable-rate term loan, which consisted of our $350.0 million term loan under our Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2017 and our $400.0 million term loan under ourthe 2018 Amended Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2018,and our $75.0 million term loan under the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement, to changes in interest expense and cash flows. The $350.0 million term loan hadhas a maturity date of August 25, 2024, which was extended to March 29, 2025 for the $400.0 million term loan.2025. Based on an outstanding principal balance on our $350.0 million term loan of $349.1$458.9 million as of December 31, 2017, and on our $400.0 million term loan of $397.0 million as of December 31, 2018,2021, and accounting for our scheduled quarterly principal balance repayments, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the one-month LIBORbenchmark rate would result in an increase in annualized interest expense of $3.5$4.6 million.
Warehouse Facility. Our variable-rate Warehouse Facility, which provides a revolving committed financing of $555.0 million including $500.0 million under the Class A commitment and $4.0$55.0 million respectively.under the Class B commitment, is exposed to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. The revolving funding period of the Warehouse Facility expires on March 31, 2022 and the maturity date is March 31, 2023. Based on the outstanding principal balance of $0.0 million as of December 31, 2021, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in the commercial paper conduit funding rate would result in no increase in annualized interest expense. The Warehouse SPV entered into a $555.0 million notional amortizing interest rate cap to protect against changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on the variable-rate Warehouse Facility to the extent three-month LIBOR exceeds 2.5%. The interest rate cap applicable to the Warehouse Facility has a maturity date of December 18, 2023.
Credit risk
Credit risk management is a critical component of our management and growth strategy. Credit risk refers to the risk of loss arising from consumer default when consumersGreenSky program borrowers are unable or unwilling to meet their financial obligations. WeWhile COVID-19 continues to impact the overall macroeconomic environment and may negatively impact our credit loss rate over at least the next 12 months, we expect our long-term credit loss rate to stay relatively constant over time; however, our portfolio may change as we look for additional opportunities to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns for our Bank Partners. Additionally, we manage our exposure to counterparty credit risk through requirement of minimum credit standards, diversification of counterparties and procedures to monitor concentrations of credit risk.
Loans originated byin our Bank Partners. Partners' Portfolios. Our Bank Partners own and bear substantially all of the credit risk on their wholly-owned loan portfolios. We regularly assess and monitor the credit risk exposure of our Bank Partners. This commences with the credit application process on our platform, during which a credit decision is rendered to a customer immediately based on preset underwriting standards provided by our Bank Partners. In rendering this
decision, we generally obtain certain information provided by the applicant and a credit report from one of the major credit bureaus. Further, onOn behalf of our Bank Partners as part of our obligation as the loan servicer, we try to mitigate portfolio credit losses through our collection efforts on past due amounts. For loans wholly owned by our Bank Partners, our credit risk exposure impacts the amount of incentive payments and, therefore, the amount of fair value change in our FCR liability, as well as any potential financial guarantee payments. Restricted cash was set aside in escrow with our Bank Partners at a weighted average target rate of 1.3%2.8% of the total outstanding loan balance as of December 31, 2018.2021. As of December 31, 2021, the financial guarantee liability associated with our escrow arrangements recognized in accordance with ASU 2016-13 represents over 60% of the contractual escrow that we have established with each Bank Partner.
Based on our incentive payments received during the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and holding all other inputs constant (namely, the size of our loan servicing portfolio and settlement activity), a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in loan servicing portfolio credit losses would have resultedresult in increases of $55.0$56.9 million and $37.7$72.5 million, respectively, in the fair value change of our FCR liability. Further, such an increase in credit losses would have causedcause us to incur additional general and administrativefinancial guarantee expense of $5.5$16.2 million and $4.3$13.1 million forduring the years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017, respectively, related to Bank Partner escrow utilization.2020, respectively.
Loan receivables held for sale. We bear all of the credit risk associated with the loan receivables that we hold for sale. Thissale, which decreased significantly as of December 31, 2021 to 1,197 loans. As of December 31, 2020, this portfolio was highly diversified across 1,193 and 5,42861,142 consumer loan receivables as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, without significant individual exposures. Based on our $2.9$5.3 million and $73.6$571.4 million loan receivables held for sale balance as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, respectively, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in portfolio credit losses would have resultedresult in lower annualized earnings of $0.0$0.1 million and $0.7$5.7 million, respectively.
Contingent consideration receivables. In exchange for selling loan participations to institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources, the Company in some cases receives a beneficial interest in the form of additional contingent consideration. The amount of the additional contingent consideration the Company may receive at a later date is based on certain potential outcomes (typically based on the credit performance of the assets sold or the underlying loans), which are significantly impacted by credit risk. Increases in credit losses related to loan participations subject to such additional contingent consideration will reduce the fair value of the contingent consideration receivables but such fair value can never be less than $0.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Index to Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To theBoard of Directors and stockholdersStockholders of GreenSky, Inc.
OpinionOpinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GreenSky Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, statementsof comprehensive income, of changes in equity (deficit) and of cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2021, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20182021 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the COSO.
Basis for OpinionOpinions
These
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidatedfinancial statements, are the responsibilityfor maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the Company's management.effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinionopinions on the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidatedfinancial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated beloware mattersarising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated
financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Fair Value of Finance Charge Reversal Liability
As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded a finance charge reversal liability of $144 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s Bank Partners offer certain loan products that have a feature whereby the account holder is provided a promotional period to repay the loan principal balance in full without incurring a finance charge. For these loan products, the Company bills interest each month throughout the promotional period and, under the terms of the contracts with Bank Partners, is obligated to pay this billed interest to the Bank Partners if an account holder pays off the loan balance in full within the promotional period. The finance charge reversal liability is carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is estimated based on historical experience and management’s expectation of future finance charge reversals. The discount rate and estimated reversal rates for billed interest on deferred loan products are the significant unobservable inputs used to value the finance charge reversal liability. The finance charge reversal liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the fair value is obtained from unobservable inputs based on the Company’s data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of the finance charge reversal liability is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment applied by management when developing the estimated reversal rates for billed interest on deferred loan products, which is used to estimate the finance charge reversal liability. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the reversal rates used to estimate the finance charge reversal liability and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s process for determining the estimate of future finance charge reversals, including controls over determining the estimated reversal rates. These procedures also included, among others, evaluating and testing management’s process for determining the fair value of the finance charge reversal liability by (i) evaluating the appropriateness of management’s method for estimating future finance charge reversals; (ii) testing the completeness, accuracy and relevance of actual historical reversal rates for billed interest on deferred loan products used by management; (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the estimated reversal rates used; and (iv) for a sample of loans, confirming that each loan was either paid off or not paid off in the promotional period consistent with the company's analysis. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the Company’s estimated reversal rates.
Fair Value of Servicing Assets and Liabilities
As described in Notes 1 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded a servicing asset of $55 million and a servicing liability of $12 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company assumes a right, obligation, or neither a right nor obligation to service consumer loans each time a loan is originated by a Bank
Partner. When the Company determines that the compensation it receives to service loans is more or less than adequate, the Company assesses the fair value of a servicing asset or liability, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model and subsequently measures the servicing asset or liability at fair value. The cost of servicing, discount rate, and weighted average remaining life are the significant unobservable inputs used to value the servicing assets and liabilities. Servicing assets and liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary components of the fair values are obtained from unobservable inputs based on peer market data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants to service the Company’s Bank Partner loans for which market data is not available.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of servicing assets and liabilities is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in determining the fair value of the servicing assets and liabilities. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating the audit evidence obtained related to the cost of servicing, discount rate, and weighted average remaining life assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the servicing asset and liability. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s process for determining the fair value of the servicing assets and liabilities, including controls over the Company’s model, assumptions, and data. These procedures also included, among others, testing the completeness, accuracy and relevance of historical data used by management and the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in testing management’s process by evaluating the appropriateness of management’s valuation model and the reasonableness of the significant assumptions related to the cost of servicing, discount rate, and weighted average remaining life.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, GA
March 15, 201911, 2022
We have served as the Company'sCompany’s auditor since 2014.
GreenSky, Inc.Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(United States Dollars in thousands, except share data) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Assets | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 296,406 | | | $ | 147,775 | |
| Restricted cash | 256,034 | | | 319,879 | |
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | 5,320 | | | 571,415 | |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $150 and $313, respectively | 19,105 | | | 21,958 | |
| Property, equipment and software, net | 23,387 | | | 21,452 | |
| Deferred tax assets, net | 488,386 | | | 387,951 | |
| Other assets | 100,122 | | | 52,643 | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,188,760 | | | $ | 1,523,073 | |
| | | |
| Liabilities and Equity (Deficit) | | | |
| Liabilities | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 11,748 | | | $ | 15,418 | |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 3,505 | | | 13,666 | |
| Other accrued expenses | 17,050 | | | 5,207 | |
| Finance charge reversal liability | 143,529 | | | 185,134 | |
| Term loan | 450,650 | | | 452,806 | |
| Warehouse facility | — | | | 502,830 | |
| Tax receivable agreement liability | 403,089 | | | 310,425 | |
| Financial guarantee liability | 104,091 | | | 131,894 | |
| Other liabilities | 83,248 | | | 81,169 | |
| Total liabilities | $ | 1,216,910 | | | $ | 1,698,549 | |
| | | |
| Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (Note 14) | 0 | | 0 |
| | | |
| Equity (Deficit) | | | |
| Class A common stock, $0.01 par value and 130,453,786 shares issued and 114,706,583 shares outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 91,317,225 shares issued and 76,734,106 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 | $ | 1,304 | | | $ | 912 | |
| Class B common stock, $0.001 par value and 69,494,728 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 and 106,165,105 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 | 70 | | | 107 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 122,353 | | | 110,938 | |
| Retained earnings | 75,819 | | | 33,751 | |
| Treasury stock | (150,487) | | | (147,360) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | — | | | (4,340) | |
| Noncontrolling interests | (77,209) | | | (169,484) | |
| Total equity (deficit) | $ | (28,150) | | | $ | (175,476) | |
| Total liabilities and equity (deficit) | $ | 1,188,760 | | | $ | 1,523,073 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Assets | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 303,390 |
|
| $ | 224,614 |
|
| Restricted cash | 155,109 |
|
| 129,224 |
|
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | 2,876 |
|
| 73,606 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | 15,400 |
|
| 18,358 |
|
| Related party receivables | 142 |
|
| 218 |
|
| Property, equipment and software, net | 10,232 |
|
| 7,848 |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | 306,979 |
|
| — |
|
| Other assets | 8,777 |
|
| 9,021 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 802,905 |
| | $ | 462,889 |
|
| | | | |
| Liabilities, Temporary and Permanent Equity (Deficit) | | | |
| Liabilities | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 5,357 |
|
| $ | 6,845 |
|
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 8,484 |
|
| 7,677 |
|
| Other accrued expenses | 1,015 |
|
| 1,606 |
|
| Finance charge reversal liability | 138,589 |
|
| 94,148 |
|
| Term loan | 386,822 |
|
| 338,263 |
|
| Tax receivable agreement liability | 260,901 |
|
| — |
|
| Related party liabilities | 825 |
|
| 1,548 |
|
| Other liabilities | 35,677 |
|
| 38,841 |
|
| Total liabilities | 837,670 |
| | 488,928 |
|
| | | | |
| Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (Note 13) |
| |
|
| Temporary Equity | | | |
| Redeemable preferred units | — |
| | 430,348 |
|
| Permanent Equity (Deficit) | | | |
| Class A common stock, par value $0.01 and 59,197,863 shares issued and 54,504,902 shares outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 | 591 |
| | — |
|
| Class B common stock, par value $0.001 and 128,549,555 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively | 129 |
| | — |
|
| Additional paid-in capital | 44,524 |
| | (554,906 | ) |
| Retained earnings | 24,218 |
| | 98,519 |
|
| Treasury stock | (43,878 | ) | | — |
|
| Noncontrolling interest | (60,349 | ) | | — |
|
| Total permanent equity (deficit) | (34,765 | ) | | (456,387 | ) |
| Total liabilities, temporary and permanent equity (deficit) | $ | 802,905 |
| | $ | 462,889 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Revenue | | | | | | |
| Transaction fees | | $ | 379,766 | | | $ | 393,137 | | | $ | 405,905 | |
| Servicing | | 124,233 | | | 115,455 | | | 123,696 | |
| Interest and other | | 14,075 | | | 17,057 | | | 3,021 | |
| Total revenue | | 518,074 | | | 525,649 | | | 532,622 | |
| Costs and expenses | | | | | | |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) | | 198,904 | | | 309,282 | | | 249,878 | |
| Compensation and benefits | | 90,118 | | | 86,715 | | | 84,052 | |
| Property, office and technology | | 18,007 | | | 16,616 | | | 16,671 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 14,045 | | | 11,330 | | | 7,304 | |
| Sales, general and administrative | | 37,507 | | | 42,476 | | | 33,350 | |
| Financial guarantee expense (benefit) | | (15,218) | | | 4,952 | | | 20,699 | |
| Related party | | 1,774 | | | 1,738 | | | 2,412 | |
| Merger Related Costs | | 11,735 | | | — | | | — | |
| Total costs and expenses | | 356,872 | | | 473,109 | | | 414,366 | |
| Operating profit | | 161,202 | | | 52,540 | | | 118,256 | |
| Other income (expense), net | | | | | | |
| Interest and dividend income | | 586 | | | 1,167 | | | 3,080 | |
| Interest expense | | (26,269) | | | (25,024) | | | (23,860) | |
| Other (losses) gains, net | | (3,825) | | | 1,576 | | | (8,628) | |
| Total other income (expense), net | | (29,508) | | | (22,281) | | | (29,408) | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 131,694 | | | 30,259 | | | 88,848 | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 13,880 | | | 1,597 | | | (7,125) | |
| Net income | | $ | 117,814 | | | $ | 28,662 | | | $ | 95,973 | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 75,670 | | | 18,697 | | | 63,993 | |
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | $ | 42,144 | | | $ | 9,965 | | | $ | 31,980 | |
| | | | | | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock: | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | $ | 0.52 | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.49 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
| Revenue |
| |
| | | |
| Transaction fees |
| $ | 348,904 |
|
| $ | 278,958 |
| | $ | 228,446 |
|
| Servicing and other |
| 65,769 |
|
| 46,929 |
| | 35,419 |
|
| Total revenue |
| 414,673 |
|
| 325,887 |
| | 263,865 |
|
| Costs and expenses |
| |
| | | |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below) |
| 160,439 |
|
| 89,708 |
| | 79,145 |
|
| Compensation and benefits |
| 62,360 |
|
| 54,650 |
| | 39,836 |
|
| Sales and marketing |
| 3,781 |
|
| 2,198 |
| | 1,085 |
|
| Property, office and technology |
| 13,199 |
|
| 10,062 |
| | 8,000 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization |
| 4,478 |
|
| 3,983 |
| | 3,708 |
|
| General and administrative |
| 15,414 |
|
| 14,876 |
| | 10,602 |
|
| Related party expenses |
| 2,212 |
|
| 4,811 |
| | 1,678 |
|
| Total costs and expenses |
| 261,883 |
|
| 180,288 |
| | 144,054 |
|
| Operating profit |
| 152,790 |
|
| 145,599 |
| | 119,811 |
|
| Other income/(expense), net |
| |
| | | |
| Interest and dividend income |
| 6,111 |
|
| 5,180 |
| | 7,302 |
|
| Interest expense |
| (23,584 | ) |
| (7,536 | ) | | — |
|
| Other gains/(losses) |
| (1,803 | ) |
| (4,575 | ) | | (2,649 | ) |
| Total other income/(expense), net |
| (19,276 | ) |
| (6,931 | ) | | 4,653 |
|
| Income before income tax expense |
| 133,514 |
|
| 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
|
| Income tax expense |
| 5,534 |
|
| — |
| | — |
|
| Net income |
| $ | 127,980 |
|
| $ | 138,668 |
| | $ | 124,464 |
|
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| 103,724 |
|
| N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. |
| $ | 24,256 |
|
| N/A |
| | N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
Earnings per share of Class A common stock(1): |
| |
| | | |
| Basic |
| $ | 0.43 |
|
| N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Diluted |
| $ | 0.41 |
|
| N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| |
(1)
| Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock are applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the initial public offering ("IPO") and related Reorganization Transactions (as defined in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). See Note 2, Earnings per Share, for the number of shares used in the computation of earnings per share of Class A common stock and the basis for the computation of earnings per share. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITYCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(United States Dollars in thousands, except share data)thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net income | | $ | 117,814 | | | $ | 28,662 | | | $ | 95,973 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | | | | | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swap | | 1,870 | | | (13,936) | | | (2,043) | |
| Reclassification adjustment into earnings related to interest rate swap | | 10,916 | | | 3,672 | | | (479) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | 12,786 | | | (10,264) | | | (2,522) | |
| Comprehensive income | | $ | 130,600 | | | $ | 18,398 | | | $ | 93,451 | |
| Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 84,116 | | | 12,017 | | | 62,227 | |
| Comprehensive income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | $ | 46,484 | | | $ | 6,381 | | | $ | 31,224 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | GreenSky Holdings, LLC (Prior to Reorganization Transactions) | GreenSky, Inc. Stockholders Equity | | |
| | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Total Permanent Equity (Deficit) | Temporary Equity | Class A Shares | Class B Shares | Class A Amount | Class B Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury stock | Noncontrolling Interest | Total |
| |
| Balance at January 1, 2016 | $ | (285,278 | ) | $ | 82,460 |
| $ | (202,818 | ) | $ | 287,566 |
| — |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 84,748 |
|
| Net income | — |
| 124,464 |
| 124,464 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 124,464 |
|
| Issuances | — |
| — |
| — |
| 48,154 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 48,154 |
|
| Redemptions | (539 | ) | — |
| (539 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (539 | ) |
| Distributions | — |
| (46,905 | ) | (46,905 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (46,905 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | 1,897 |
| — |
| 1,897 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,897 |
|
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | 391 |
| — |
| 391 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 391 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | (283,529 | ) | $ | 160,019 |
| $ | (123,510 | ) | $ | 335,720 |
| — |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 212,210 |
|
| Net income | — |
| 138,668 |
| 138,668 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 138,668 |
|
| Issuances | — |
| — |
| — |
| 194,387 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 194,387 |
|
| Redemptions | (447 | ) | — |
| (447 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (447 | ) |
| Distributions | (275,197 | ) | (200,168 | ) | (475,365 | ) | (99,759 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (575,124 | ) |
| Unit option exercises | 15 |
| — |
| 15 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 15 |
|
| Share-based compensation | 3,951 |
| — |
| 3,951 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,951 |
|
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | 301 |
| — |
| 301 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 301 |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | (554,906 | ) | $ | 98,519 |
| $ | (456,387 | ) | $ | 430,348 |
| — |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (26,039 | ) |
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | GreenSky Holdings, LLC (Prior to Reorganization Transactions) | GreenSky, Inc. Stockholders Equity | | |
| | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Total Permanent Equity (Deficit) | Temporary Equity | Class A Shares | Class B Shares | Class A Amount | Class B Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury stock | Noncontrolling Interest | Total |
| |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | (554,906 | ) | $ | 98,519 |
| $ | (456,387 | ) | $ | 430,348 |
| — |
| — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (26,039 | ) |
| Activity prior to and including Reorganization Transactions | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| 38,213 |
| 38,213 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 38,213 |
|
| Issuances | 339 |
| — |
| 339 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 339 |
|
| Redemptions | (496 | ) | — |
| (496 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (496 | ) |
| Distributions | (37,980 | ) | (57,003 | ) | (94,983 | ) | (16,358 | ) | | | | | | | | | (111,341 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | 2,132 |
| — |
| 2,132 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2,132 |
|
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | 6 |
| — |
| 6 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6 |
|
| Effect of Reorganization Transactions | 590,905 |
| (79,729 | ) | 511,176 |
| (413,990 | ) | 15,816,268 |
| — |
| 158 |
| — |
| (97,344 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Activity in connection with IPO | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Issuances of Class A common stock, net of costs | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 43,700,000 |
| — |
| 437 |
| — |
| 950,553 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 950,990 |
|
| Issuances of Class A common stock effective on date of IPO | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 434,783 |
| — |
| 4 |
| — |
| (4 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Issuances of Class B common stock | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 128,983,353 |
| — |
| 129 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 129 |
|
| Purchases of GreenSky Holdings, LLC units | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (901,833 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (901,833 | ) |
| Class A common stock repurchases | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (2,426,198 | ) | — |
| (24 | ) | — |
| (52,988 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (53,012 | ) |
| Class A common stock option exercises | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 125,398 |
| — |
| 1 |
| — |
| (1 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Initial effect of the Reorganization Transactions and IPO on noncontrolling interest | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 69,299 |
| — |
| — |
| (69,299 | ) | — |
|
| Deferred tax adjustments | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 47,129 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 47,129 |
|
| Activity subsequent to Reorganization Transactions and IPO | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 24,256 |
| — |
| 65,511 |
| 89,767 |
|
| Issuance of unvested Class A common stock awards | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 234,829 |
| — |
| 2 |
| — |
| (2 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Class A common stock option exercises | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,035,724 |
| — |
| 10 |
| — |
| (4,820 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| (4,810 | ) |
| Class B common stock exchanges | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 277,059 |
| (277,059 | ) | 3 |
| — |
| (3 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Forfeited share-based compensation awards | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (11,750 | ) | (156,739 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
|
| Treasury stock purchases | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (4,681,211 | ) | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (43,878 | ) | — |
| (43,878 | ) |
| Distributions | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| (38 | ) | — |
| (27,036 | ) | (27,074 | ) |
| Share-based compensation | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,906 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 3,906 |
|
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 10 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 10 |
|
| Deferred tax adjustments | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,097 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 1,097 |
|
| Impact on noncontrolling interest of change in ownership during period | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 29,525 |
| — |
| — |
| (29,525 | ) | — |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| 54,504,902 |
| 128,549,555 |
| $ | 591 |
| $ | 129 |
| $ | 44,524 |
| $ | 24,218 |
| $ | (43,878 | ) | $ | (60,349 | ) | $ | (34,765 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(United States Dollars in thousands)thousands, except share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| GreenSky, Inc. Stockholders Equity | | |
| Class A Shares | Class B Shares | Class A Amount | Class B Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Noncontrolling Interest | Total |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 54,504,902 | | 128,549,555 | | $ | 591 | | $ | 129 | | $ | 44,524 | | $ | 24,218 | | $ | (43,878) | | $ | — | | $ | (60,349) | | $ | (34,765) | |
| Net income | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 31,980 | | — | | — | | 63,993 | | 95,973 | |
Cumulative effect of accounting change(1) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (87) | | — | | — | | (203) | | (290) | |
| Issuance of unvested Class A common stock awards | 2,887,905 | | — | | 29 | | — | | (29) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Class A common stock option exercises | 2,273,592 | | — | | 23 | | — | | (12,067) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (12,044) | |
| Class B common stock exchanges | 15,730,379 | | (15,910,785) | | 157 | | (16) | | (2,339) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (2,198) | |
| Class B warrant exercises | — | | 1,180,163 | | — | | 1 | | (1) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Forfeited share-based compensation awards | (210,845) | | (301,735) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Class A common stock repurchases | (8,744,477) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (102,241) | | — | | — | | (102,241) | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement and other | (16,618) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (115) | | — | | — | | (115) | |
| Distributions | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (2) | | — | | — | | (18,666) | | (18,668) | |
| Share-based compensation | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,754 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 13,754 | |
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | — | | — | | — | | — | | 15 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 15 | |
| Tax adjustments | — | | — | | — | | — | | 8,158 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 8,158 | |
| Impact on noncontrolling interest of change in ownership during period | — | | — | | — | | — | | 63,767 | | — | | — | | — | | (63,767) | | — | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (756) | | (1,766) | | (2,522) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 66,424,838 | | 113,517,198 | | $ | 800 | | $ | 114 | | $ | 115,782 | | $ | 56,109 | | $ | (146,234) | | $ | (756) | | $ | (80,758) | | $ | (54,943) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 127,980 |
|
| $ | 138,668 |
| | 124,464 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
| | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 4,478 |
|
| 3,983 |
| | 3,708 |
|
| Share-based compensation expense | 6,038 |
|
| 3,951 |
| | 1,897 |
|
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | 16 |
|
| 301 |
| | 391 |
|
| Impairment losses | 19 |
|
| 78 |
| | 107 |
|
| Losses on abandonment | — |
|
| — |
| | 44 |
|
| Non-cash rent expense | (392 | ) |
| (308 | ) | | (278 | ) |
| Amortization of debt related costs | 1,684 |
|
| 687 |
| | — |
|
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
|
| 254 |
| | — |
|
| Fair value change in assets and liabilities | 945 |
|
| 2,071 |
| | — |
|
| Original issuance discount on term loan payment | (31 | ) |
| (9 | ) | | — |
|
| Deferred tax expense | 5,525 |
|
| — |
| | — |
|
| Other losses | — |
| | — |
| | 36 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
| | |
| (Increase)/decrease in loan receivables held for sale | 70,730 |
|
| (32,338 | ) | | (39,425 | ) |
| (Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable | 2,958 |
|
| (1,595 | ) | | (3,778 | ) |
| (Increase)/decrease in related party receivables | 76 |
|
| 1,217 |
| | (1,360 | ) |
| (Increase)/decrease in deposits | — |
|
| — |
| | 5,837 |
|
| (Increase)/decrease in other assets | 1,574 |
|
| (823 | ) | | 1,266 |
|
| Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable | (1,488 | ) |
| 3,222 |
| | 440 |
|
| Increase/(decrease) in finance charge reversal liability | 44,441 |
|
| 26,084 |
| | 18,605 |
|
| Increase/(decrease) in related party liabilities | (722 | ) |
| 494 |
| | 1,035 |
|
| Increase/(decrease) in other liabilities | (7,405 | ) |
| 14,457 |
| | 8,954 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 256,426 |
| | 160,394 |
| | 121,943 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
| Purchases of property, equipment and software | (6,581 | ) |
| (4,135 | ) | | (4,666 | ) |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (6,581 | ) | | (4,135 | ) | | (4,666 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from IPO, net of underwriters discount and commissions | 954,845 |
|
| — |
| | — |
|
| Purchases of GreenSky Holdings, LLC units | (901,833 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Purchases of Class A common stock | (53,012 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Issuances of Class B common stock | 129 |
|
| — |
| | — |
|
| Redemptions of GreenSky Holdings, LLC units prior to Reorganization Transactions | (496 | ) |
| (447 | ) | | (539 | ) |
| Proceeds from term loan | 399,000 |
|
| 346,500 |
| | — |
|
| Repayments of term loan | (352,094 | ) |
| (866 | ) | | — |
|
| Member contributions | — |
|
| 200,000 |
| | 50,000 |
|
| Member distributions | (141,518 | ) |
| (561,935 | ) | | (46,905 | ) |
| Purchases of treasury stock | (41,847 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Option and warrant exercises prior to Reorganization Transactions | 339 |
|
| 15 |
| | — |
|
| Payment of equity transaction expenses prior to Reorganization Transactions | (32 | ) |
| (5,500 | ) | | (1,831 | ) |
| Proceeds from option exercises after Reorganization Transactions | 59 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payment of option exercise taxes after Reorganization Transactions | (4,869 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Payment of IPO related expenses | (3,855 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
|
| Payment of debt issuance costs | — |
|
| (8,302 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | (145,184 | ) | | (30,535 | ) | | 725 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | 104,661 |
| | 125,724 |
| | 118,002 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | 353,838 |
|
| 228,114 |
| | 110,112 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 458,499 |
| | $ | 353,838 |
| | $ | 228,114 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| GreenSky, Inc. Stockholders Equity | | |
| Class A Shares | Class B Shares | Class A Amount | Class B Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Noncontrolling Interest | Total |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 66,424,838 | | 113,517,198 | | $ | 800 | | $ | 114 | | $ | 115,782 | | $ | 56,109 | | $ | (146,234) | | $ | (756) | | $ | (80,758) | | $ | (54,943) | |
| Net income | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 9,965 | | — | | — | | 18,697 | | 28,662 | |
Cumulative effect of accounting change(1) | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (32,212) | | — | | — | | (75,447) | | (107,659) | |
| Issuance of unvested Class A common stock awards | 3,473,245 | | — | | 35 | | — | | (35) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Class A common stock option exercises | 449,931 | | — | | 4 | | — | | 393 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 397 | |
| Class B common stock exchanges | 7,304,310 | | (7,304,310) | | 73 | | (7) | | (66) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Forfeited share-based compensation awards | (697,383) | | (47,783) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement and other | (220,835) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (1,126) | | — | | — | | (1,126) | |
| Distributions | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (111) | | — | | — | | (48,397) | | (48,508) | |
| Share-based compensation | — | | — | | — | | — | | 14,907 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 14,907 | |
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | — | | — | | — | | — | | 16 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 16 | |
| Tax adjustments | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,042 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 3,042 | |
| Impact on noncontrolling interest of change in ownership during period | — | | — | | — | | — | | (23,101) | | — | | — | | — | | 23,101 | | — | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (3,584) | | (6,680) | | (10,264) | |
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 76,734,106 | | 106,165,105 | | $ | 912 | | $ | 107 | | $ | 110,938 | | $ | 33,751 | | $ | (147,360) | | $ | (4,340) | | $ | (169,484) | | $ | (175,476) | |
(1)Represents the cumulative effect resulting from our adoption of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, Measurements of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our implementation.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Supplemental cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest paid | $ | 21,892 |
|
| $ | 6,475 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| Income taxes paid | — |
|
| 254 |
|
| 306 |
|
| Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity transaction costs accrued but not paid | $ | 82 |
|
| $ | 114 |
|
| $ | 15 |
|
| Leasehold improvements acquired but not paid | 300 |
|
| 756 |
|
| — |
|
| Distributions accrued but not paid | 10,086 |
|
| 13,189 |
|
| — |
|
| Treasury stock traded, but not settled | 2,031 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| GreenSky, Inc. Stockholders Equity | | |
| Class A Shares | Class B Shares | Class A Amount | Class B Amount | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Noncontrolling Interest | Total |
|
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | 76,734,106 | | 106,165,105 | | $ | 912 | | $ | 107 | | $ | 110,938 | | $ | 33,751 | | $ | (147,360) | | $ | (4,340) | | $ | (169,484) | | $ | (175,476) | |
| Net income | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 42,144 | | — | | — | | 75,670 | | 117,814 | |
| Issuance of unvested Class A common stock awards | 2,263,300 | | — | | 23 | | — | | (23) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Class A common stock option exercises | 202,884 | | — | | 2 | | — | | 864 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 866 | |
| Class B common stock exchanges | 36,670,377 | | (36,670,377) | | 367 | | (37) | | (330) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Forfeited share-based compensation awards | (691,370) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Shares withheld related to net share settlement and other | (472,714) | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (3,127) | | — | | — | | (3,127) | |
| Distributions | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | (76) | | — | | — | | (15,506) | | (15,582) | |
| Share-based compensation | — | | — | | — | | — | | 15,660 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 15,660 | |
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | — | | — | | — | | — | | 7 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 7 | |
| Tax adjustments | — | | — | | — | | — | | 18,902 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 18,902 | |
| Impact on noncontrolling interest of change in ownership during period | — | | — | | — | | — | | (23,665) | | — | | — | | — | | 23,665 | | — | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | 4,340 | | 8,446 | | 12,786 | |
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 114,706,583 | | 69,494,728 | | $ | 1,304 | | $ | 70 | | $ | 122,353 | | $ | 75,819 | | $ | (150,487) | | $ | — | | $ | (77,209) | | $ | (28,150) | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(United States Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash flows from operating activities | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 117,814 | | | $ | 28,662 | | | $ | 95,973 | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 14,045 | | | 11,330 | | | 7,304 | |
| Share-based compensation expense | 15,660 | | | 14,907 | | | 13,754 | |
| Equity-based payments to non-employees | 7 | | | 16 | | | 15 | |
| Fair value change in servicing assets and liabilities | (13,773) | | | (2,157) | | | (29,679) | |
| Operating lease liability payments | 741 | | | (478) | | | (394) | |
| Financial guarantee expense (benefit) | (15,218) | | | (2,816) | | | 16,072 | |
| Amortization of debt related costs | 7,377 | | | 2,549 | | | 1,675 | |
| Original issuance discount on term loan payment | (72) | | | (57) | | | (42) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 13,878 | | | 1,597 | | | (7,125) | |
| Loss on remeasurement of tax receivable agreement liability | — | | | 1,386 | | | 9,790 | |
| Impairment losses | — | | | 188 | | | — | |
| Mark to market on loan receivables held for sale | (3,226) | | | 6,342 | | | — | |
| Loss on interest rate swap settlement | 6,781 | | | — | | | — | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | | |
| (Increase) decrease in loan receivables held for sale | 569,320 | | | (525,831) | | | (49,050) | |
| (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable | 2,853 | | | (2,465) | | | (4,049) | |
| (Increase) decrease in other assets | (32,718) | | | (5,295) | | | (448) | |
| Increase (decrease) in accounts payable | (3,669) | | | 3,506 | | | 6,860 | |
| Increase (decrease) in finance charge reversal liability | (41,605) | | | (20,901) | | | 67,446 | |
| Increase (decrease) in guarantee liability | (12,584) | | | (7,768) | | | — | |
| Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | 5,290 | | | 29,184 | | | 25,225 | |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | 630,901 | | | (468,101) | | | 153,327 | |
| Cash flows from investing activities | | | | | |
| Purchases of property, equipment and software | (15,602) | | | (14,567) | | | (15,381) | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (15,602) | | | (14,567) | | | (15,381) | |
| Cash flows from financing activities | | | | | |
| Proceeds from term loan | — | | | 70,494 | | | — | |
| Repayments of term loan | (4,678) | | | (4,318) | | | (3,958) | |
| Proceeds from Warehouse Facility | 328,781 | | | 852,060 | | | — | |
| Repayments of Warehouse Facility | (831,611) | | | (349,230) | | | — | |
| Class A common stock repurchases | — | | | — | | | (104,272) | |
| Member distributions | (16,746) | | | (51,041) | | | (23,468) | |
| Proceeds from option exercises | 917 | | | 470 | | | 307 | |
| Tax withholding payments on equity compensation | (3,078) | | | (1,199) | | | (12,351) | |
| Payment of taxes on Class B common stock exchanges | — | | | — | | | (2,198) | |
| Payments under tax receivable agreement | (4,098) | | | (12,755) | | | (4,664) | |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | (530,513) | | | 504,481 | | | (150,604) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | 84,786 | | | 21,813 | | | (12,658) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | 467,654 | | | 445,841 | | | 458,499 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | $ | 552,440 | | | $ | 467,654 | | | $ | 445,841 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Supplemental cash flow information | | | | | |
| Interest paid | $ | 39,793 | | | $ | 27,612 | | | $ | 22,429 | |
| Income taxes paid | 7 | | | 13 | | | 11 | |
| Supplemental non-cash investing and financing activities | | | | | |
| Capitalized software costs accrued but not paid | $ | 773 | | | $ | 395 | | | $ | — | |
| Distributions accrued but not paid | 1,570 | | | 3,136 | | | 5,798 | |
| Tax withholding on equity awards accrued but not paid | 100 | | | — | | | — | |
| Beneficial interest in contingent consideration | 25,746 | | | — | | | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 1. Organization, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and New Accounting Standards
Organization
Unless the context requires otherwise, "we", "us", "our","we," "us," "our," "GreenSky" and "the Company" refer to the business of GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. "Bank Partners" are the federally insured banks that originate loans under the consumer financing and payments program that we administer for use by merchants on behalf of such banks in connection with which we provide point-of-sale financing and payments technology and related marketing, servicing, collection and other services (the "GreenSky program" or "program").
We are a leading technology company Powering Commerce at the Point of SaleSM®. Our platform is powered by a proprietary, patented technology infrastructure that facilitates merchant sales, while reducing the friction and improving the economics associated with a consumer making a purchase and a banklender or financial institution extending financing for that purchase. It supports the full transaction lifecycle, including credit application, underwriting, real-time allocation to our Bank Partners, document distribution, funding, settlement and servicing. Merchants using our platform, which presently range from small, owner-operated home improvement contractors and healthcare providers to large national home improvement brands and retailers and healthcare service organizations, rely on us to facilitate low or deferred interest promotional point-of-sale financing and payments solutions that enable higher sales volume.volume than they could otherwise achieve on their own. Consumers on our platform, who to date primarily have super-prime or prime credit scores, find financing with promotional terms to be an attractive alternative to other forms of payment. Our Bank Partners' access to our proprietary technology solution and merchant network enables them to build a diversified portfolio of high qualityhigh-quality consumer loans with attractive risk-adjusted yields with minimal upfront investment.
GreenSky, Inc. was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 12, 2017. The Company was formed for the purpose of completing an IPOinitial public offering ("IPO") of its Class A common stock and certain Reorganization Transactions, as further described below, in order to carry on the business of GreenSky, LLC ("GSLLC"), a Georgia limited liability company. GSLLC is an operating entity and wholly-owned subsidiary of GS Holdings, LLC (“("GS Holdings”Holdings") and its consolidated subsidiaries.. GS Holdings, a holding company with no operating assets or operations other than its equity interest in GSLLC, was organized in August 2017.to serve as a holding company for GSLLC. On August 24, 2017, GS Holdings acquired a controlling100% interest in GSLLC. The equity of GS Holdings is owned partially by GreenSky, LLC ("GSLLC"), a Georgia limited liability company, which is an operating entity.Inc. and partially by certain pre-IPO equity owners of GS Holdings. Common membership interests of GS Holdings are referred to as "Holdco Units."
Immediately prior to our IPO, (i) the operating agreement of GS Holdings (the "GS Holdings Agreement") was amended and restated to, among other things, modify its capital structure by replacing the different classes of membership interests and profits interests with Holdco Units; (ii) we issued to each of the Continuing LLC Members (as defined below) a number of shares of GreenSky, Inc. Class B common stock equal to the number of Holdco Units held by it (other than the Holdco Units that were exchanged in connection with the IPO), for consideration in the amount of $0.001 per share of Class B common stock; (iii) certain Holdco Units were contributed to GreenSky, Inc. in exchange for shares of our Class A common stock; (iv) equity holders of the Former Corporate Investors (as defined below) contributed their equity in the Former Corporate Investors to GreenSky, Inc. in exchange for shares of our Class A common stock and the right to certain payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”("TRA"), and Former Corporate Investors merged with and into subsidiaries of GreenSky, Inc.; (v) outstanding options to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings were equitably adjusted so that they are exercisable for shares of Class A common stock; and (vi) outstanding warrants to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings were equitably adjusted pursuant to their terms so that they are exercisable for Holdco Units (and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock). We refer to these transactions collectively as the “Reorganization"Reorganization Transactions.”"
FollowingImmediately following the Reorganization Transactions, the Original"Original GS Equity OwnersOwners" (other than the Former Corporate Investors) and certain Original"Original Profits Interests Holders," which we collectively refer to as the "Continuing
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
"Continuing LLC Members," continuecontinued to own Holdco Units. Original"Original GS Equity OwnersOwners" refers to the owners of units of GS Holdings prior to the Reorganization Transactions. Former"Former Corporate InvestorsInvestors" refers to certain of the Original GS Equity Owners that merged with and into one or more subsidiaries of GreenSky, Inc. in connection with the Reorganization Transactions, which was accounted for as a common control transaction and had no material impact on the net assets of the Company. Original"Original Profits Interests HoldersHolders" refers to the owners of profits interests in GS Holdings prior to the Reorganization Transactions.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
On May 24, 2018, the Company's Class A common stock commenced trading on the NASDAQ StockNasdaq Global Select Market in connection with its IPO of 43,700,000 shares of its Class A common stock at a public offering price of $23.00 per share, receiving approximately $954.8 million in net proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions (but not including other offering costs), which were used to purchase 2,426,198 shares of Class A common stock and 41,273,802 newly-issued GS Holdings common units at a price per unit equal to the price per share of Class A common stock sold in the IPO, less underwriting discounts and commissions.Company's IPO. The newly-issued GS Holdings common unitsHoldco Units were sold by Continuing LLC Members,certain GS Holdings members, which we also refer to as "Exchanging Members." Pursuant to an "Exchange Agreement," the ExchangingContinuing LLC Members can exchange their Holdco Units (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one1-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments, or for cash (based on the market price of the shares of Class A common stock), at our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our board of directors).
The IPO and Reorganization Transactions resulted in the Company becoming the sole managing member of GS Holdings. As the sole managing member of GS Holdings, we operate and control all of GS Holdings’ operations and, through GS Holdings and its subsidiaries, conduct GS Holdings’ business.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had an economic interest in GS Holdings of 30.0%, after adjusting for unvested units. The Company consolidates the financial results of GS Holdings and reports a noncontrolling interest in its Consolidated Financial Statements representing the GS Holdings interests held by the Continuing LLC Members. The weighted average ownership percentages for the applicable reporting periods are used to attribute net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) to the Company and the noncontrolling interest. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had an economic interest in GS Holdings of 62.3% and 42.0%, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had a weighted average ownership interest in GS Holdings of 43.1% and 38.3%, respectively.
In 2020, we formed GS Depositor I, LLC (“Depositor”), an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and GS Investment I, LLC (the “Warehouse SPV”), a special purpose vehicle and indirect subsidiary of the Company, to facilitate purchases of participation interests in loans (“Warehouse Loan Participations") originated by Bank Partners through the GreenSky program. These purchases are made by Depositor and then transferred to the Warehouse SPV. Each of the Warehouse SPV and Depositor is a separate legal entity from the Company, and the assets of the Warehouse SPV and Depositor are solely available to satisfy the creditors of the Warehouse SPV or Depositor, respectively.
Pending Merger
On September 14, 2021, GreenSky, Inc. and GS Holdings entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Goldman Sachs”), and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, a bank organized under the laws of the State of New York and wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs (“Goldman Sachs Bank”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth therein, (a) Goldman Sachs Bank will establish a new wholly owned subsidiary, which will be a Delaware limited liability company (“Merger Sub 1”), and GreenSky, Inc. will be merged with and into Merger Sub 1 (the “Company Merger”), with Merger Sub 1 surviving the Company Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Bank (“Surviving LLC 1”), and (b) Goldman Sachs Bank will establish a new wholly owned subsidiary, which will be a Georgia limited liability company (“Merger Sub 2”), and Merger Sub 2 will be merged with and into GS Holdings (the “Holdings Merger” and, together with the Company Merger, the “Mergers”), with GS Holdings surviving the Holdings Merger as a subsidiary of Goldman Sachs Bank and Merger Sub 1 (“Surviving LLC 2”). Consummation of the Mergers is subject to the receipt of required regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. As a condition to Goldman Sachs’s entry into the Merger Agreement, the Company and certain beneficiaries party to the Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of May 23, 2018 (the “TRA”), by and among the Company, GS Holdings, GreenSky, LLC and the blocker corporations and beneficiaries party thereto, were required to enter into an amendment to the TRA (the "TRA Amendment"), which amendment provided that no payments under the TRA will be made following or as a result of the consummation of the Mergers. Costs that are incremental and specifically related to the pending merger are presented within merger-related costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements were prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). In the opinion of management, the Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair statement of our financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.
AsCertain reclassifications have been made to the Reorganization Transactions were considered to be among entities under common control resulting in a change in the reporting entity, we retrospectively adjusted the historical Consolidated Financial Statements of GS Holdings as if the common control transaction had occurred as of the earliest period presented.
During theprior year ended December 31, 2018, we changed the classification of provision for bad debt expense within the cash flows provided by operating activities in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. It is no longer presented separately as an adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities and, instead, is presented within the change in accounts receivable. The classification of this item for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 of $817 and $322, respectively, was changedpresentation to conform to the current year presentation.presentation in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These reclassifications were not material to the financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Such estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited to, those that relate to fair value measurements, financial guarantees, share-based compensation and income taxes. In developing estimates and assumptions, management uses all available information; however, actual results could materially differ from those estimates and assumptions.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash includes non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposit accounts with various financial institutions. Cash equivalents include money market mutual fund accounts, which are invested in government securities. We consider all highly liquid investments that mature three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars equivalents. Cash equivalents include money market mutual fund accounts, which are invested in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
government securities that are either guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation of the U.S. government ("FDIC") or are secured by U.S. government-issued collateral for which the risk of loss from nonpayment is presumed to be zero. As such, we do not establish an allowance for credit losses on our cash equivalents. TheFurther, the carrying amountsamount of our cash equivalents approximate theirapproximates its fair values due to their short maturities and highly liquid nature. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.information on our fair value measurement.
At times, our cash balances may exceed federally insured amounts and potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk. The Company believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to these balances based on its assessment of the creditworthiness and financial viability of these financial institutions. Further, our cash equivalents may expose us to credit risk; however, we believe this risk is limited, as the investments are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily consists ofincludes cash held in interest-bearing escrow accounts that are required under the terms of the contracts with federally insured banks that originate loans under the GreenSky program and any other lenders with respect to those loans (referred to henceforth as "Bank Partners"). Restricted cash is typically comprised of three components: (i) amounts we have escrowed with Bank Partners asprovide limited protection to theour Bank Partners in the event of excesscertain Bank Partner portfolio credit losses; (ii) additional amounts we maintainlosses or in the event that the finance charges billed to borrowers do not exceed the sum of an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized credit losses. Restricted cash also includes cash maintained for certain Bank Partners based on a contractual percentage of the total interest billed on outstanding deferred interest loans that are within the promotional period less previousrelated to our finance charge reversalsreversal ("FCR") on such outstanding loans; and (iii)liability, certain custodial in-transit loan funding and consumer borrower payments that we arewere restricted from usinguse for our operations. These custodial balances are not consideredoperations, and cash related to collections in our evaluation of restricted cash usage. As it relates to our restricted cash escrowedconnection with Bank Partners, we record a liability for the amount of restricted cash we expect to be payable to our Bank Partners, which is accounted for as a financial guarantee.Warehouse Loan Participations. Refer to Note 1314 for additional information.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total included within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of the periodsdates indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 303,390 |
| | $ | 224,614 |
| | $ | 185,243 |
|
| Restricted cash | 155,109 |
| | 129,224 |
| | 42,871 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | $ | 458,499 |
| | $ | 353,838 |
| | $ | 228,114 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 296,406 | | | $ | 147,775 | | | $ | 195,760 | |
| Restricted cash | 256,034 | | | 319,879 | | | 250,081 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | $ | 552,440 | | | $ | 467,654 | | | $ | 445,841 | |
Loan Receivables Held for Sale
Loan receivables held for sale represent a 100% participatingparticipation interest in certain loans originated under the loan products thatGreenSky program by our Bank Partners originate andthat the Company subsequently purchases the receivable with the intent to sell to a third party at carrying value. Loan receivables held for sale are recorded at fair value at the time a loan receivable is purchased and are subsequently measured at the lower of cost or fair value on an aggregate homogeneous portfolio basis, which is further discussed in “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities” below. We earn interest income on such loan receivables. Interest, calculated as a percentage of average outstanding principal balance in accordance with the contractual provisions of the loan arrangements, is accrued on a daily basis and collected from the account holderborrower on a monthly basis. Accrued interest receivable and origination costs are deferred in the basis of the loan receivables. When the loan receivables are sold, any previously unrecognized deferred costs are recognized as part of realized gains and losses on sale. Gains and losses from the sale of loan receivables held for sale by the Warehouse SPV are included within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Gains and losses from the sale of all other loan receivables held for sale are included within other income/(expense)gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We typically retain an economic interest in the sold loan receivables in the form of servicing rights and obligations.
The entire balance of a loan receivable held for sale is considered contractually delinquent if the minimum required payment is not received by the first statement cycle date equal to or following the due date specified on the customer’s billing statement. Loan receivables held for sale and accrued interest are marked down to zero and written off when the principal or interest is delinquent for greater than 90 days, with the related expenses recorded as reductionssales, general and administrative expense and reduction of interest and other gains/(losses) and interest income,revenue, respectively, which are included within other income/
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Valuation adjustments are also taken if loansloan receivables delinquent less than 90 days are expected to charge off in the future and are recorded to other gains/(losses)sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Recoveries of principal and finance chargesinterest and fees on previously written off loan receivables held for sale are recognized on a collected basis as reductions of sales, general and administrative expense and as interest and other gains and interest income,revenue, respectively.
At times, we transferhave transferred our rights to previously charged-off loan receivables (“Charged-Off Receivables”) and receivereceived commensurate proceeds based on the expected recovery rate of such loan receivables. We have no continuing involvement with these Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables other than performing reasonable servicing and collection efforts on behalf of the third parties and Bank Partners that paid for the rights to the Charged-Off Receivables.charged-off receivables. The proceeds from the transfers of Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables attributable to loan receivables held for sale are recognized on a collected basis as other gains/(losses)reductions of sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to “Fair"Servicing Assets and Liabilities" and "Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities”Liabilities" below for additional information on our Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables transactions.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded at their original invoice amounts, which are reduced by any allowance for uncollectible amounts. We use the aging method to establish an allowance for uncollectible amounts when management determines that collectability is uncertain.expected credit losses on accounts receivable balances and consider whether current conditions or reasonable and supportable forecasts about future conditions warrant an adjustment to our historical loss experience. In applying such adjustments, we primarily consider changes in counterparty credit risk and changes in the underlying macroeconomic environment. Accounts
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
receivable are written off once delinquency exceeds 90 days. Recoveries of previously written off accounts receivable are recognized on a collected basis as a reduction to the provision for bad debt expense,credit losses, which is included within sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Note 5 for additional information on our accounts receivable.
Property, Equipment, Software, Depreciation and Amortization
Property, equipment and software includes furniture, leasehold improvements, computer hardware and software and is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization and any previously recorded impairment. We capitalize qualified costs incurred to develop internal-use software, which primarily include internal and external labor expenses. We alsoAdditionally, we capitalize costs for replacements and major enhancements when it is probable that the expenditures will result in additional functionality or will extend the useful life of existing functionality. Costs for minor replacements, enhancements, maintenance and repairs of internal-use software are expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Asset Category | | Estimated Useful Lives |
| Computer hardware and software | | 3 years |
| Furniture | | 5 years |
| Leasehold improvements | | Shorter of life of asset or remaining lease term |
Upon a sale or retirement, the asset cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and any related gain or loss is included within sales, general and administrative expensesexpense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
We evaluate the carrying amounts of property, equipment and software for impairment on a quarterly basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are included within sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Servicing Assets and Liabilities
The Company assumes a right, obligation, or neither a right nor obligation to service consumer loans each time a loan is originated by a Bank Partner. Consumer loans originated by a Bank Partner may continue to be held by that Bank Partner, or sold to another Bank Partner, institutional investor, financial institution or other funding source. Additionally, the Company services charged-off receivables for which we do not charge a servicing fee. The Company identified Bank Partner loans as one class of servicing rights and charged-off receivables as a separate class of servicing rights. In accordance with ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, when we determine that the compensation we receive to service loans is more or less than adequate, we assess the fair value of a servicing asset or liability, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model and subsequently measure the servicing asset or liability at fair value. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the fair values of this class of servicing assets and liabilities were immaterial.model.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The Company services Charged-Off Receivables to which we transferred our rights to third parties and Bank Partners. As we do not charge a servicing fee in our arrangement with this select group of third parties and Bank Partners, this arrangement gives rise to servicing liabilities. Servicing liabilities related to the Charged-Off Receivables are initially recognized at fair value, using a discounted cash flow model, and are recorded within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We elected the fair value method to measure theseeach class of servicing liabilitiesrights subsequent to initial recognition, as we believe that fair value is a more meaningful measure of our expected right or obligation with respect to this classthese classes of servicing liabilities.assets or liabilities, respectively. This election is irrevocable for this classthese classes of servicing assets or liabilities. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the servicing assets associated with Bank Partner loans are recorded within other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the servicing liabilities associated with Bank Partner loans and charged-off receivables are recorded within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Refer to “Fair"Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities”Liabilities" below and Note 3 for additional information on the measurement of these assets and liabilities.
Refer to Note 3 and Note 8 for additional information on our servicing liabilities.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
We have financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement or disclosure on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Such measurements or disclosures relate to our cash and cash equivalents, loan receivables held for sale, FCR liability,derivative instruments, servicing assets and liabilities, associated with Charged-Off Receivables,contingent consideration receivables, and term loan.
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In valuing this asset or liability, we utilize market data or reasonable assumptions that market participants would use, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. The guidance provides a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or a liability as of the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
An asset’s or a liability’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
We apply the market approach, which uses observable prices and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities, to value our cash and cash equivalents and loan receivables held for sale. We apply the income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single, discounted present value amount, to value our FCR liability, contingent consideration receivables, and servicing assets and liabilities. We determine the fair valuevalues of our interest rate swap, interest rate cap, and term loan by applying a discounted cash flow model based on observable market factors and credit factors specific to us.
Refer to Note 3 for additional fair value disclosures.
Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to interest rate risk on our variable-rate term loan, which we managed through an interest rate swap that was determined to be a derivative in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Derivatives are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value and are marked-to-market on a quarterly basis. The accounting for the change in fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate the derivative as a hedge and apply hedge accounting, and whether the hedging relationship continues to satisfy the criteria required to apply hedge accounting.
Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in cash flows of a recognized asset or liability that is attributable to a particular risk are considered cash flow hedges. The primary purpose of cash flow hedge accounting is to link the income statement recognition of a hedging instrument and a hedged item whose changes in cash flows are expected to offset each other. The change in the fair value of the derivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same period when the hedged item affects earnings. The reclassification into earnings is reported in the same income statement line item in which the hedged item is reported.
The FCR component of our Bank Partner contracts, which arrangements are detailed in Note 3, qualifies as an embedded derivative. The FCR liability is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and, as such, changes in its fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
We have other embedded derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges. Refer to Note 3 and Note 8 for additional fair value and derivative disclosures.
Financial Guarantees
Under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners, we provide limited protection to the Bank Partners in the event of certain Bank Partner portfolio credit losses or in the event that the finance charges billed to borrowers do not exceed the sum of (i) an agreed-upon portfolio yield, (ii) a fixed servicing fee and (iii) realized credit losses, by holding cash in restricted, interest-bearing escrow accounts in an amount equal to a contractual percentage of the Bank Partners’ monthly originations and month-end outstanding portfolio balance. Our maximum exposure under these financial guarantees is contractually limited to the escrow that we establish with each Bank Partner. Cash set aside to meet this requirement is classified as restricted cash in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our contracts with our Bank Partners entitle us to incentive payments when the finance charges billed to borrowers exceed the sum of (i) an agreed-upon portfolio yield, (ii) a fixed servicing fee and (iii) realized credit losses. This incentive payment varies from month to month, primarily due to the amount of realized credit losses. If credit losses exceed an agreed-upon threshold, we are obligated to make limited payments to our Bank Partners, which obligation represents a financial guarantee in accordance with ASC 460, Guarantees. Under ASC 460, the guarantor undertakes a noncontingent obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guarantee and a contingent obligation to make future payments if the triggering events or conditions under the guarantee arrangements occur.
Under ASU 2016-13, we are required to estimate the expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a present contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by the issuer. As applied to our financial guarantee arrangements, we are required to estimate expected credit losses, and the impact of those estimates on our potential escrow payments, for loans within our Bank Partner portfolios that are either funded or approved for funding at the measurement date, but are precluded from including future loan originations by our Bank Partners. Consistent with the modeling of loan losses for any consumer loan portfolio assumed to go into "run-off," our recognized financial guarantee liability under this model represents a significant portion of the contractual escrow established with each Bank Partner. Typically, additional financial guarantee liabilities are recorded as new loans are originated by our Bank Partners on our platform, along with a corresponding non-cash charge recorded as financial guarantee expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As the terms of our guarantee arrangements are determined contractually with each Bank Partner, we measure our contingent obligation separately for each Bank Partner using a discounted cash flow method based on estimates of the outstanding loan attributes of the Bank Partner's loan servicing portfolio and our expectations of forecasted information, including macroeconomic conditions, over the period which our financial guarantee is expected to be used in a "run-off" scenario. We use our historical experience as a basis for estimating escrow usage and adjust for current conditions or forecasts of future conditions if they are determined to vary from our historical experience. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on our financial guarantees.
Revenue Recognition
In accordance with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, in each of our revenue arrangements outlined below, revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
Transaction revenue
Transaction fees revenue
We earn a specified transaction fee in connection with purchases made by borrowers that are financed by our Bank Partners. The transaction fee is a one-time fee payable by the merchant that includes a merchant fee
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
component and an interchange fee component. In our merchant arrangements, our single performance obligation is to facilitate financing to the merchant’s qualified customers who comply with our Bank Partners’ mandatory underwriting criteria and credit policies. As it relates to our merchant arrangements, we act in the capacity of an agent, as our
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
platform facilitates the arrangement between the merchant and customerconsumer (for contracted services) and the arrangement between the Bank Partner and customerconsumer (for loan financing) and we do not control either the merchant services or the financing prior to them being transferred to the customer.consumer.
Merchant fees
The merchant fee is calculated by multiplying a set fee percentage (as outlined in a schedule provided to the merchants) by the dollar amount of a loan at the point of origination. As merchant fees are billed to, and collected directly from, the merchant at least monthly, the transaction price and volume isare generally known and there is no unresolved variable consideration as of the end of a reporting period. WeTo estimate variable consideration and recognize revenue at the point of sale, by applyingwe apply the expected value method, wherein we assign 100% probability to the transaction price as calculated using actual transaction volume. While merchant fee reversals are contractually possible and would constrain our estimate of variable consideration, historically they have been historically immaterial. Therefore, we have not recognized a refund liability for these reversals. Our expected value is further adjusted during the month for rebates or price concessions (collectively, “price concessions”"price concessions"), as discussed below.
Gross contractual merchant fees may be reduced by volume-based or non-volume-based price concessions to certain merchants and channel partners (which we refer to as "Sponsors"), which are offered to generate transaction volume on the GreenSky platform. As an agent, weWe recognize merchant fees net of consideration paid to merchants or Sponsors in the form of price concessions, which represents our expected consideration. The price concessions give rise to additional variable consideration at contract inception, which we estimate at the individual merchant level using the expected value method. For merchants and Sponsors receiving monthly or quarterly price concessions, which constitutesconstitute the vast majority of our arrangements, it is not probable that a significant reversal in the cumulative amount of revenue recognized would occur, as the uncertainty is resolved by the end of a reporting period. Therefore, the transaction price is not significantly constrained and we assign 100% probability to the transaction price as calculated using actual transaction volume net of actual merchant and Sponsor price concessions. In the limited instances in which we issue annual price concessions whichor provide other incentives to merchants and sponsors that are not resolved by the end of a reporting period, such as those based on an annual volume target, we determine the expected value based on quarterly progress and expected future progress (using historical experience) toward achieving the annual volumeestimated target. Volume-based price concessions as well as amortization of incentive assets to merchants and Sponsors that were netted against the gross transaction price were $9,965, $6,930,$20.4 million, $14.2 million, and $8,241$14.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively. There were no significant non-volume-based price concessions made during the same periods.
Interchange fees
Interchange fees are calculated by multiplying a set fee percentage (as stipulated by the credit card payment network) by the transaction volume processed through such network. Transaction volume and related fees payable to the Company are reported to us on a daily basis. Therefore, there is no unresolved variable consideration within a reporting period. Using the expected value method, we assign 100% probability to the transaction price as calculated using actual transaction volume.
We satisfy our performance obligation to facilitate financing to our merchants’ qualified customers continuously throughout our contractual terms with our Bank Partners. Our merchants receive and consume the benefits of such performance simultaneously as we perform, which is reflected through the consummation of a purchase by the end customerconsumer who obtained financing through the GreenSky platform. Therefore, this performance obligation is satisfied over time.time and no significant financing component is present, as payment occurs within twelve months of the transfer of control of the related service. Our performance obligation is completely satisfied once a customer’sconsumer’s application has been approved, a credit decision has been reached and a loan has been funded and processed, indicating that a sale has been completed by a merchant on our platform. We measure our progress toward complete satisfaction of this performance obligation usingunder the output method and using the "right-to-invoice" practical expedient, with transaction volume representing the direct measure that faithfully depicts a completed sale by a merchant on our platform. The value of our service transferred to the merchants is represented by the merchant fee rate, as agreed
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
upon at contract inception, and the interchange fee rate, as stipulated by the credit card payment network. Therefore, we recognize revenue on at least a monthly basis for merchant fees and on a daily basis for interchange fees.
We apply the practical expedient related to incremental costs of obtaining a contract. Although certain of our commission costs qualify for capitalization under ASC 340-40, Contracts with customers, their amortization period is less than one year. Therefore, utilizing the practical expedient, we expense these costs as incurred.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Servicing and otherrevenue
Servicing fees
Servicing fees are contractual fees specified in our servicing agreements with our Bank Partners that are earned from providing professional services to manage loan portfolios on behalf of our Bank Partners, which representsrepresenting the single performance obligation in this contractual arrangement. The servicing fee is calculated on a monthly basis by multiplying a set fee percentage (as outlined in the contracts with our Bank Partners) by the average outstanding Bank Partner loan portfolio balance. As the average outstanding loan portfolio balance is not known at contract inception, this arrangement contains variable consideration. However, as servicing fees are settled monthly with our Bank Partners, the average outstanding loan portfolio balance is known at each month end. Therefore, there is no unresolvedthe variable consideration within a reporting period.period is not significantly constrained. Using the expected value method, we assign 100% probability to the transaction price as calculated using the actual average outstanding loan portfolio balance.
We satisfy our performance obligation to service the Bank Partners’ loans on a recurring, monthly basis for as long as a loan balance is outstanding. The benefits of our servicing are simultaneously received and consumed by the Bank Partners. Therefore, this performance obligation is satisfied over time.time and no significant financing component is present, as payment occurs within twelve months of the transfer of control of the related service. We measure our progress toward complete satisfaction of this performance obligation using the output method and applying the "right-to-invoice" practical expedient, with loans outstanding representing the direct measure that faithfully depicts the loans for which control of servicing has transferred to the Bank Partners. The value of our service transferred to the Bank Partners is represented by the servicing fee rate, as agreed upon at contract inception. Therefore, we recognize revenue on a monthly basis upon settling with the Bank Partner.
Disaggregated revenue
Revenue disaggregated by type of service was as follows for the periods presented: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Merchant fees | | $ | 363,438 | | | $ | 363,216 | | | $ | 361,755 | |
| Interchange fees | | 16,328 | | | 29,921 | | | 44,150 | |
| Transaction fees | | 379,766 | | | 393,137 | | | 405,905 | |
Servicing(1) | | 124,233 | | | 115,455 | | | 123,696 | |
Interest income(2) | | 14,074 | | | 17,049 | | | 2,977 | |
Other(3) | | 1 | | | 8 | | | 44 | |
| Interest and other | | 14,075 | | | 17,057 | | | 3,021 | |
| Total revenue | | $ | 518,074 | | | $ | 525,649 | | | $ | 532,622 | |
(1)For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, includes a $12.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, change in fair value of our servicing assets and liabilities related to Bank Partner arrangements. Refer to Note 3 for additional information. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Merchant fees | | $ | 297,776 |
| | $ | 234,548 |
| | $ | 190,632 |
|
| Interchange fees | | 51,128 |
| | 44,410 |
| | 37,814 |
|
| Transaction fees |
| 348,904 |
|
| 278,958 |
| | 228,446 |
|
| Servicing fees | | 65,597 |
| | 46,575 |
| | 32,447 |
|
Other(1) | | 172 |
| | 354 |
| | 2,972 |
|
| Servicing and other |
| 65,769 |
|
| 46,929 |
| | 35,419 |
|
| Total revenue |
| $ | 414,673 |
|
| $ | 325,887 |
| | $ | 263,865 |
|
| |
(1)(3)Other revenue includes miscellaneous revenue items that are individually immaterial. Other revenue is presented separately herein in order to clearly present merchant fees, interchange fees, servicing fees, and interest income which are more integral to our primary operations and better enable financial statement users to calculate metrics such as servicing and merchant fee yields. | Other revenue includes miscellaneous revenue items that are individually immaterial. Other revenue is presented separately herein in order to clearly present merchant, interchange and servicing fees, which are more integral to our primary operations and better enable financial statement users to calculate metrics such as servicing and merchant fee yields. |
We have no remaining performance obligations as of December 31, 2018. No2021. NaN assets were recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer as of December 31, 20182021 and 2020. Because we recognize revenue as
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
invoiced, no contract assets or 2017.contract liabilities were recorded as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. We recognized bad debt expensecredit losses arising from our contracts with customers of $1,294, $817$35 thousand, $644 thousand and $966$950 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, which isare recorded within sales, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Share-Based Compensation
The Company issues share-based awards to certain employees and non-employees, which are measured at fair value at the date of grant. The fair value determined at the date of grant is expensed, based on our estimate of awards that will eventually vest, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. We estimate expected forfeitures based on historical forfeiture behavior. Share-based compensation expense is included within compensation and benefits expense and cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Note 1112 for additional information.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided for in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (ASC Topic 740)Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements, using the statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Refer to Note 1213 for additional information.
Related Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we enter into certain transactions with entities or individuals that are deemed to be affiliated companies or persons under the related party definition in ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures. Refer to Note 1415 for additional information.
Consolidation
In the normal course of our business, we may enter into an agreement for management, servicing, or related services or hold ownership interests in special purpose entities. We evaluate our interests and/or involvement in these entities to determine whether they meet the definition of a variable interest entity ("VIE"), pursuant to ASC 810, Consolidation, and whether we are required to consolidate these entities.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilitiesSimplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes
In January 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2016-012019-12, which modifies ASC 740, Income Taxes, to addresssimplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain aspectsexceptions, including intraperiod tax allocations and the calculation of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. We adopted the standard as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. Asincome taxes in an interim period when in a result of adopting the standard, we eliminated the disclosure of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet, which applies to our fair value of term loan disclosure in Note 3.loss position. The remaining provisions of the standard were either not applicable to us or already satisfied in our disclosures.must be applied on a prospective basis. Our adoption of this standard on January 1, 2021 did not have any additional impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Scope of modification accounting
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 to provide clarity and reduce both diversity in practice and the cost and complexity to an entity when applying the guidance in ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The standard provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. We adopted the standard as of January 1, 2018, and are applying its provisions prospectively to any award modified on or after the adoption date. Our adoption of this standard did not have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Disclosure framework - changes to the disclosure requirements for fair value measurement
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 to modify certain disclosure requirements about recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements to improve disclosure effectiveness. We adopted the standard as of the date of issuance. As a result of adopting this standard, we replaced our previously disclosed quantitative sensitivity analysis for unobservable inputs used to develop our Level 3 fair value measurements with narrative descriptions of the uncertainty of our fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs, and added explanations of how we calculated the weighted averages of the significant unobservable inputs used to develop our Level 3 fair value measurements. Our adoption of this standard did not have any additional impactmaterial effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounting Standards Issued, But Not Yet Adopted
LeasesFacilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting
In February 2016,March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,2020-04, which requireswas subsequently amended in January 2021 by ASU 2021-01, related to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference the recognitionLondon Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for operating leases with terms greater than 12 months on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Presentationreference rate reform. The
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, whichstandard provides an additional (and optional) transition methodoptional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP if certain criteria are met. The standard applies to adopt ASU 2016-02contract modifications that replace a reference rate affected by applying its provisions at the adoption datereference rate reform and recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustmentcontemporaneous modifications of other contract terms related to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, rather than applying the provisions at the beginningreplacement of the earliest period presentedreference rate. Further, the standard provides exceptions to certain guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, related to changes to the financial statements. Thecritical terms of a hedging relationship due to reference rate reform and provides optional expedients for fair value, cash flow and net investment hedging relationships for which the component excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness is affected by reference rate reform. This standard is effective for us on January 1, 2019, and we will apply its provisions using the optional transition method prescribed in ASU 2018-11, whereby we will record a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2019, and we will retain the prior year presentation and disclosures in accordance with predecessor guidance in ASC 840. Therefore, the Consolidated Balance Sheet presentation for 2019 will not be comparable to the prior period presented in the first yearas of adoption. On January 1, 2019, we expect to record a right-of-use asset of approximately $11.3 million, a lease liability of approximately $14.1 millionMarch 12, 2020, and an immaterial cumulative-effect adjustmententity may elect to retained earnings.
Measurement of credit losses on financial instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, which is intended to better align the timing of recognition of credit losses on financial instruments with management’s expectations. The standard requires a financial asset (or group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. Management must determine expected credit losses for all financial instruments held at the reporting dateadopt it through December 31, 2022 based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts, the latter of which broadens current guidance. The standard requires enhanced disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users to better understand the significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses. The standard is effective for us on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, but not before January 1, 2019. The majority of this standard's provisions must be applied using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this standard.
Improvements to non-employee share-based payment accounting
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 to simplify certain aspects of the accounting for non-employee share-based payment transactions. Under the new standard, all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor's own operations by issuing share-based payment awards are within the scope of ASC 718. Consistent with the accounting requirement for employee share-based payment awards, non-employee share-based payment awards within the scope of ASC 718 are measured at grant-date fair value of the equity instruments, and the requirement to reassess classification of non-employee share-based payment awards upon vesting is eliminated. The standard is effective for us on January 1, 2019 using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earningsapplying as of the beginning of an interim period up to the fiscal yeardate that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected, the provisions of adoption to remeasure equity-classified awardsthe standard must be applied prospectively for which a measurement date has not been established and liability-classified awards thatall similar eligible contract modifications. We have not been settled byyet elected an adoption date, are currently identifying arrangements referenced to rates, such as US dollar LIBOR, that are expected to be discontinued, and are evaluating our options for modifying such arrangements in accordance with the datestandard. We will continue to assess and plan for how the phase out of adoption. WeLIBOR will affect the Company. While the LIBOR transition could adversely affect the Company, we do not expect our adoption of this standardthe impact to have any impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Customer's accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, costs for implementation activities in the application development stage are capitalized depending on the nature of the costs, while costs incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages are expensed as the activities are performed. This standard also requires entities to amortize the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement and to apply the existing impairment guidance in ASC 350-40be material to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets. The standard clarifies that such capitalized implementation costs are also subject to the guidance on abandonment in ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment.Company.
In addition, this standard requires alignment in presentation between: (1) the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs and the fees associated with the hosting element (service)
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
associated hosting arrangement on the balance sheet, and (3) the payments for capitalized implementation costs and the payments made for fees associated with the hosting element in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for us on January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. We are refining our inventory of existing cloud computing arrangements to identify hosting arrangements that are service contracts and will evaluate how to account for the implementation costs of such arrangements.
Note 2. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share of Class A common stock is computed by dividing net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock is computed by dividing net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc., adjusted for the assumed exchange of all potentially dilutive Holdco Units for Class A common stock, by the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding adjusted to give effect to potentially dilutive elements.
Prior to the IPO, the GS Holdings membership structure included Class A, B, and C Units and Profits Interests. The Company analyzed the calculation of earnings per unit for periods prior to the IPO and determined that it resulted in values that would not be meaningful to the users of these Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, earnings per share information has not been presented for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The following table sets forth reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock for the yearperiods indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Numerator: | | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | $ | 131,694 | | | $ | 30,259 | | | $ | 88,848 | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | 75,670 | | | 18,697 | | | 63,993 | |
| Less: Income tax expense (benefit) | | 13,880 | | | 1,597 | | | (7,125) | |
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. – basic | | $ | 42,144 | | | $ | 9,965 | | | $ | 31,980 | |
| Add: Reallocation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from the assumed exchange of Holdco Units for Class A common stock | | 75,670 | | | 18,697 | | | 63,993 | |
Less: Income tax expense on reallocation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(1) | | 17,990 | | | 4,565 | | | 8,189 | |
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. – diluted | | $ | 99,824 | | | $ | 24,097 | | | $ | 87,784 | |
| Denominator: | | | | | | |
| Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding – basic | | 76,860,802 | | | 67,553,999 | | | 61,091,514 | |
| Add: Dilutive effects, as shown separately below | | | | | | |
| Holdco Units exchangeable for Class A common stock | | 101,610,495 | | | 109,221,484 | | | 116,223,055 | |
| Class A common stock options | | 308,959 | | | 332,420 | | | 1,876,876 | |
| Holdco warrants exchangeable for Class A common stock | | — | | | — | | | 82,008 | |
| Unvested Class A common stock | | 1,982,535 | | | 642,935 | | | 174,592 | |
| Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding – diluted | | 180,762,791 | | | 177,750,838 | | | 179,448,045 | |
| | | | | | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock outstanding – basic | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.15 | | | $ | 0.52 | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock outstanding – diluted | | $ | 0.55 | | | $ | 0.14 | | | $ | 0.49 | |
| | | | | | |
Excluded from diluted earnings per share, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive(2) |
| Holdco Units | | — | | | 389,945 | | | 510,878 | |
| Class A common stock options | | 1,349,509 | | | 3,841,138 | | | 3,289,299 | |
| Class A common stock awards | | 1,500 | | | 2,123,280 | | | 2,040,965 | |
(1)We assumed effective tax rates of 24.2%, 20.4%, and 1.2% for the years ended December 31, 2018. The basic2021, 2020, and 2019respectively, which represent the effective tax rates on the consolidated GreenSky, Inc. entity inclusive of the income taxes on the portion of GS Holdings' earnings that are attributable to noncontrolling interests.
(2)These amounts represent the number of instruments outstanding at the end of the period. Application of the treasury stock method would reduce these amounts if they had a dilutive effect and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2018 represents only the period from May 24, 2018 to December 31, 2018, the period wherein we had outstanding Class A common stock.share.
|
| | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 |
| Numerator: | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | $ | 133,514 |
|
| Less: Net income attributable to GS Holdings prior to the Reorganization Transactions | | 38,213 |
|
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests after the Reorganization Transactions | | 65,511 |
|
| Less: Income tax expense | | 5,534 |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. – basic | | $ | 24,256 |
|
| Add: Reallocation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests after the Reorganization Transactions from the assumed exchange of Holdco Units for Class A common stock | | 65,511 |
|
Less: Income tax expense on reallocation of net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(1) | | 12,784 |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. – diluted | | $ | 76,983 |
|
| Denominator: | | |
| Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding – basic | | 57,008,324 |
|
| Add: Dilutive effects as shown separately below | | |
| Holdco Units exchangeable for Class A common stock | | 127,939,939 |
|
| Class A common stock options | | 2,984,196 |
|
| Holdco warrants exchangeable for Class A common stock | | 808,961 |
|
Unvested Class A common stock(2) | | 163,521 |
|
| Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding – diluted | | 188,904,942 |
|
| | | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock outstanding – basic | | $ | 0.43 |
|
Earnings per share of Class A common stock outstanding – diluted(3) | | $ | 0.41 |
|
| |
(1)
| We assumed an effective tax rate of 19.2%. |
| |
(2)
| Includes both unvested Class A common stock issued as part of the Reorganization Transactions and unvested Class A common stock awards issued subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions. |
| |
(3)
| Our calculation of diluted earnings per share excludes 1,533,029 Class A common stock options and 134,170 unvested Class A common stock awards for the year ended December 31, 2018, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. These amounts represent the number of instruments outstanding at the end of the period. Application of the treasury stock method would reduce these amounts if they had a dilutive effect and were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. |
Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock do not participate in the earnings or losses of the Company and, therefore, are not participating securities. As such, separate presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share of Class B common stock under the two-class method has not been presented.included.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 3. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
The following table summarizes, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis or disclosed, but not carried, at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates presented. There were no transfers into, out of, or between levels within the fair value hierarchy during any of the periods presented. Refer to Note 4, Note 7, Note 8, and Note 9 for additional information on these assets and liabilities. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
Carrying
Value | | Fair
Value | | Carrying
Value | | Fair
Value |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1) | | 1 | | $ | 296,406 | | | $ | 296,406 | | | $ | 147,775 | | | $ | 147,775 | |
Loan receivables held for sale, net(2) | | 2 | | 5,320 | | | 5,901 | | | 571,415 | | | 575,279 | |
Servicing assets(3) | | 3 | | 54,869 | | | 54,869 | | | 30,804 | | | 30,804 | |
Contingent consideration receivables(3) | | 3 | | 14,617 | | | 14,617 | | | — | | | — | |
Interest rate cap(3) | | 2 | | 493 | | | 493 | | | — | | | — | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Finance charge reversal liability(3) | | 3 | | $ | 143,529 | | | $ | 143,529 | | | $ | 185,134 | | | $ | 185,134 | |
Term loan(1) | | 2 | | 450,650 | | | 458,413 | | | 452,806 | | | 452,408 | |
Interest rate swap(3) | | 2 | | — | | | — | | | 14,182 | | | 14,182 | |
Servicing liabilities(3) | | 3 | | 12,276 | | | 12,276 | | | 1,984 | | | 1,984 | |
Sales facilitation obligations(3) | | 2 | | 13,258 | | | 13,258 | | | 10,655 | | | 10,655 | |
GreenSky, Inc.(1)Disclosed, but not carried, at fair value.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)(2)Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)(3)Measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Level | | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Carrying
Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1) | | 1 | | $ | 303,390 |
| | $ | 303,390 |
| | $ | 224,614 |
| | $ | 224,614 |
|
Loan receivables held for sale, net(2) | | 2 | | 2,876 |
| | 3,552 |
| | 73,606 |
| | 74,190 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Finance charge reversal liability(3) | | 3 | | $ | 138,589 |
| | $ | 138,589 |
| | $ | 94,148 |
| | $ | 94,148 |
|
Servicing liabilities(3) | | 3 | | 3,016 |
| | 3,016 |
| | 2,071 |
| | 2,071 |
|
Term loan(1) | | 2 | | 386,822 |
| | 386,234 |
| | 338,263 |
| | 345,820 |
|
| |
(1)
| Disclosed, but not carried, at fair value. For our term loan, the amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2018 relate to the modified term loan and amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2017 relate to the original term loan. See Note 7 for additional information. The carrying value of our term loan is net of unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs. The fair value of our term loan was determined using a discounted cash flow model based on observable market factors (such as changes in credit spreads for comparable benchmark companies) and credit factors specific to us.
|
| |
(2)
| Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. |
| |
(3)
| Measured and carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Servicing liabilities are presented within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash flow impacts of our liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are included within net cash provided by operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. |
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from quoted market prices in an active market, which is the net asset value of the underlying funds.market. The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair values due to the short maturities and highly liquid nature of these accounts. See Note 1 for additional information.
Loan receivables held for sale, net
Loan receivables held for sale are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the lower of cost or fair value and, therefore, are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. ForOur loan receivables held for sale are primarily loan participations owned by the Warehouse SPV. Fair value of our loan receivables held for sale fair value approximates par value, as we have consistently sold loans foris determined based on the full current balance in historical and current period transactions with our Bank Partners.
anticipated sale price of such participations to third parties. Loan receivables held for sale are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from observable values of loan receivables with similar terms and characteristics.
Servicing assets and liabilities
We previously elected the fair value method to account for our servicing assets and liabilities to more appropriately reflect the value of the servicing rights in our Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of this election, our servicing assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on a recurring basis within other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are estimated using a discounted cash flow model. Servicing assets and liabilities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary components of the fair value are obtained from unobservable inputs based on peer market data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants to service our Bank Partner loans and transferred charged-off receivables portfolios, for which market data is not available. Changes in the fair value of our servicing assets and liabilities
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
related to our bank partner arrangements are recorded within servicing revenue and changes in the fair value of our servicing liabilities related to charged-off receivables are recorded within other gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Contractually specified servicing fees recorded within servicing revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations totaled $111.8 million, $115.1 million and $93.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The cash flow impacts of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are included within net cash provided by operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending fair value measurements of our servicing assets associated with Bank Partner loans during the years presented. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 30,804 | | | $ | 30,459 | | | $ | — | |
Additions, net(1) | 46,833 | | | 1,897 | | | 5,975 | |
| Changes in fair value | (22,768) | | | (1,552) | | | 24,484 | |
| Ending balance | $ | 54,869 | | | $ | 30,804 | | | $ | 30,459 | |
(1)Includes additions through assumptions of servicing obligations each time a loan is originated on our platform by a Bank Partner, as well as through transfers of loans between Bank Partners or of loan receivables between GreenSky and Bank Partners and is net of the impact of loan principal pay downs in the Bank Partner portfolios. Additions are recognized in servicing revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending fair value measurements of our servicing liabilities associated with Bank Partner loans and transferring our rights to charged-off receivables during the periods presented. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 1,984 | | | $ | 3,796 | | | $ | 3,016 | |
Additions, net(1) | | (180) | | | — | | | 2,705 | |
Changes in fair value(2) | | 10,472 | | | (1,812) | | | (1,925) | |
Ending balance(3) | | $ | 12,276 | | | $ | 1,984 | | | $ | 3,796 | |
(1)Includes additions through assumptions of servicing obligations each time a loan is originated on our platform by a Bank Partner, as well as through transfers of loan receivables between Bank Partners or of loan receivables between GreenSky and Bank Partners and is net of the impact of loan principal pay downs in the Bank Partner portfolios. Additions are recognized in servicing revenue in the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2)Includes reduction of our servicing liabilities associated with transferring our rights to charged-off receivables of $1.3 million, $1.8 million and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, due to the passage of time and collection of loan payments, which is recognized in other gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(3)Includes servicing liabilities associated with transferring our rights to charged-off receivables of $663 thousand, $2.0 million and $3.8 million as of December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Significant assumptions used in valuing our servicing assets and liabilities include the following:
Cost of servicing: The cost of servicing represents the servicing rate a willing market participant would require to service loans with similar characteristics as the Bank Partner loans or charged-off receivables. The cost of servicing is weighted based on the outstanding balance of the loans.
Discount rate: The discount rate reflects the time value of money adjusted for a risk premium and is within an observable range based on peer market data.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Weighted average remaining life: For Bank Partner loans, the weighted average remaining life is determined using the aggregate curves for each loan product type based on expected cumulative annualized rates of prepayments and defaults.
Recovery period: For charged-off receivables, our recovery period is determined based on a reasonable recovery period for loans of these sizes and characteristics based on historical experience. We assumed that collection efforts for these loans will cease after five years, and the run-off of the portfolio will follow a straight-line methodology, adjusted for actual cash recoveries over time.
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used to value the Level 3 servicing assets and liabilities as of the dates presented. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Input | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Range | | Weighted Average | | Range | | Weighted Average |
| Cost of servicing (basis points) | | 62.5 – 88.2 | | 77.8 | | 57.5 - 108.0 | | 95.0 |
| Discount rate | | 18.0 | % | | 18.0% | | 18.0 | % | | 18.0% |
| Weighted average remaining life (years) | | 2.7 – 7.3 | | 6.5 | | 2.3 - 5.8 | | 2.3 |
| Recovery period (years) | | 0.8 – 2.9 | | 2.2 | | 1.6 – 3.9 | | 3.1 |
A significant increase or decrease in the market cost of servicing could result in significantly lower or higher, respectively, servicing assets and higher or lower, respectively, servicing liabilities as of the measurement date.
A significant increase or decrease in the discount rate could result in lower or higher, respectively, servicing assets and liabilities as of the measurement date. However, as the weighted average remaining life of loans is relatively short, we would not expect significant changes in the discount rate to materially impact the fair value measure.
The average remaining life is weighted by the unpaid balance of the Bank Partner loans as of the measurement date. A significant increase or decrease in the expected weighted average remaining life could result in significantly higher or lower servicing assets as of the measurement date.
The recovery period is weighted by the unpaid balance of previously transferred charged-off receivables as of the measurement date. A significant increase or decrease in the expected recovery period could result in higher or lower, respectively, servicing liabilities.
Contingent consideration receivables
In exchange for selling loan participations to institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources, the Company receives cash, and, in some cases, beneficial interest in the form of additional contingent consideration, which may be received at a later date based on certain potential outcomes (typically based on the credit performance of the assets sold or the underlying loans).
The contingent consideration receivables serve as a host contract containing an embedded derivative as the credit and prepayment performance of the loan participations are tied to the underlying debtor, rather than the third party purchaser of the loan participations, which results in the economic characteristics and risks being not clearly and closely related to the host contract. In accordance with ASC 825, GreenSky irrevocably elected to initially and subsequently measure the contingent consideration receivables as a whole, inclusive of the embedded credit derivative, at fair value. This election is made on an instrument by instrument basis, and our election only affects the contingent consideration receivables and does not apply to, nor implicate, other receivables.
The contingent consideration receivables are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the fair value is obtained from unobservable inputs based on the Company’s data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration receivables are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant assumptions used in valuing our contingent consideration receivables include a discount rate and settlement period.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
At December 31, 2021, the Company had contingent consideration receivables for which the fair value of the asset was $14.6 million related to underlying beneficial interest in that consideration of $25.7 million.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending fair value measurements of our contingent consideration receivables during the period presented. There were no loan participations subject to contingent consideration receivables as of December 31, 2020.
| | | | | |
| Year Ended
December 31, 2021 |
| Beginning balance | $ | — | |
Additions(1) | 12,922 | |
Receipts(2) | — | |
Other fair value changes(3) | 1,695 | |
| Ending balance | 14,617 | |
| |
(1)Includes each initial receivable that GreenSky is entitled to each time an applicable pool of loan participations is sold to institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources.
(2)Represents cash receipt of contingent consideration.
(3)Represents changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration receivables due to the passage of time, changes in the portfolio delinquency rate or prepayment rate.
Significant assumptions used in valuing our Bank Partners. We havecontingent consideration receivables include the abilityfollowing:
Discount rate: The discount rate reflects the time value of money adjusted for a risk premium and is within an observable range based on peer market data.
Settlement period: Our settlement period represents the number of years before the contingent consideration receivables can be released and is determined based on a reasonable settlement period for loan participations based on contractual terms.
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used to access this market,value the Level 3 contingent consideration receivables as of the date presented. There were no loan participations subject to contingent consideration receivables as of December 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Input | December 31, 2021 |
| Range | | Weighted Average |
| Discount rate | 15 | % | | 15 | % |
| Settlement period (years) | 1.8 - 6.0 | | 5.0 |
A significant increase or decrease in the discount rate could result in lower or higher, respectively, contingent consideration receivables as of the measurement date. However, as the weighted average settlement period of the contingent consideration receivables is relatively short, we would not expect significant changes in the discount rate to materially impact the fair value measure.
The settlement term is weighted by the outstanding contingent consideration receivables balance as of the measurement date. A significant increase or decrease in the settlement period could result in lower or higher, respectively, contingent consideration receivables as of the measurement date.
Interest rate cap
In January 2021, the Warehouse SPV entered into a $555.0 million notional amortizing interest rate cap with a strike rate of 2.5%. This cap is intended to protect against exposure to changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on $555.0 million of our variable-rate Warehouse Facility to the extent three-month LIBOR exceeds 2.5%. The interest rate cap is carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and it is classified within Level 2 of the market into which these loan receivablesfair value hierarchy, as the inputs to the derivative pricing model are typically sold. See Note 4 for additional informationgenerally observable and
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
do not contain a high level of subjectivity. The fair value of the interest rate cap was determined based on the present value of the estimated future net cash flows using implied rates in the applicable yield curve as of the valuation date. Changes in the fair value of our loan receivables held for sale.interest rate cap are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Finance charge reversalsreversal liability
Our Bank Partners offer certain loan products that have a feature whereby the account holderborrower is provided a promotional period to repay the loan principal balance in full without incurring a finance charge. For certain of these loan products, weour Bank Partners bill interest each month throughout the promotional period and such amounts are included in the determination of the incentive payments paid by our Bank Partners to us. However, under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners, we are obligated to pay an amount equal to this billed interest to the Bank Partners if an account holder pays offrepays the loan balance in full within the promotional period.period and such interest is reversed. Therefore, the monthly process of billing interest on deferred loan products triggers a potential future FCR liability for the Company. The FCR component of our Bank Partner contracts qualifies as an embedded derivative. The FCR liability is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and, as such, changes in its fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The FCR liability is carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is estimated based on historical experience and management’s expectation of future FCR. The FCR liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the fair value is obtained from
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
unobservable inputs based on the Company’s data, reasonably adjusted for assumptions that would be used by market participants. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending fair value measurements of our FCR liability during the periods indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 185,134 | | | $ | 206,035 | | | $ | 138,589 | |
Receipts(1) | | 223,650 | | | 215,049 | | | 159,527 | |
Settlements(2) | | (337,698) | | | (382,968) | | | (262,449) | |
Fair value changes recognized in cost of revenue(3) | | 72,443 | | | 147,018 | | | 170,368 | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 143,529 | | | $ | 185,134 | | | $ | 206,035 | |
(1)Includes: (i) incentive payments from Bank Partners, which is the surplus of finance charges billed to borrowers over an agreed-upon portfolio yield, a fixed servicing fee and realized net credit losses, (ii) cash received from recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans and (iii) the proceeds received from transferring our rights to charged-off receivables attributable to previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. We consider all monthly incentive payments from Bank Partners during the period to be related to billed finance charges on deferred interest products until monthly incentive payments exceed total billed finance charges on deferred products, which did not occur during any of the periods presented. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 94,148 |
| | $ | 68,064 |
| | $ | 49,459 |
|
Receipts(1) | | 129,153 |
| | 109,818 |
| | 79,508 |
|
Settlements(2) | | (181,590 | ) | | (127,029 | ) | | (102,406 | ) |
Fair value changes recognized in cost of revenue(3) | | 96,878 |
| | 43,295 |
| | 41,503 |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 138,589 |
| | $ | 94,148 |
| | $ | 68,064 |
|
| |
(1)
| Represents cash received from deferred payment loans during the promotional period, referred to as incentive payments, cash received from recoveries on previously charged-off Bank Partner loans, and the proceeds received from transferring our rights to Charged-Off Receivables attributable to previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. We consider all monthly incentive payments from Bank Partners during the period to be related to billed finance charges on deferred interest products until monthly incentive payments exceed total billed finance charges on deferred products, which did not occur during any of the periods presented. |
| |
(2)
| (2)Represents the reversal of previously billed finance charges associated with deferred payment loan principal balances that were repaid within the promotional period. The years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 also includes $20.1 million and $28.8 million of billed finance charges related to loan participations held by the Warehouse SPV that were not yet collected and subject to a potential future finance charge reversal at the time of purchase, which were paid to the Bank Partner in full as of the participation purchase dates. (3)A fair value adjustment is made based on the expected reversal percentage of billed finance charges (expected settlements), which is estimated at each reporting date. The fair value adjustment is recognized in cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Significant assumptions used in valuing our FCR liability include the following: Reversal rate: The reversal rate represents our estimate of the percentage of previously billed finance charges associated with deferred payment loan principal balances that paid off within the promotional period. |
| |
(3)
| A fair value adjustment is made based on the expected reversal percentage of billed finance charges (expected settlements), which is estimated at each reporting date. The fair value adjustment is recognized in cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
Our estimated reversal rate for billed interest on deferred loan products isthat we expect we will be obligated to remit to the significant unobservable input usedBank Partners due to value the Level 3 FCR liability. Asborrower paying off the loan balance in full within the promotional period. The historical period over which we have expanded our deferred loan products and as our historical experience with these products has progressed, management has developed more specificevaluate reversal rates formay also vary among the categories of deferred loan products based on the length and relevance of our historical experience with such products at the interest-free promotional period (ranging from 6 to 24 months), whether or not loan principal payments were required to be paid duringmeasurement date.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Discount rate: The discount rate reflects the interest-free promotional period, andtime value of money adjusted for a risk premium.
The following table presents quantitative information about the industry vertical (home improvement or elective healthcare). This has resulted in incremental increases in the number of reversal rate assumptionssignificant unobservable inputs used to value the Level 3 FCR liability. The following table presents the ranges and weighted averages of our estimated reversal ratesliability as of the dates indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| Reversal rate | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Range | | 70.0% – 97.3% |
| | 85.5% – 98.0% |
| | 88.0% – 88.5% |
|
| Weighted average | | 88.2 | % | | 89.0 | % | | 88.3 | % |
The weighted averages in the above table were calculated by first determining the percentage of the reporting date FCR liability attributable to each category of deferred loan products for which a reversal rate assumption is determined. We then multiplied these weights by the unique reversal rate for each category and summed the resulting products.presented. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| | Range | | Weighted Average | | Range | | Weighted Average |
| Reversal rate | | 59.0 – 100.0% | | 90.2 | % | | 64.8 – 100.0% | | 89.2 | % |
| Discount rate | | 3.6 | % | | 3.6 | % | | 3.5 | % | | 3.5 | % |
A significant increase or decrease in the estimated reversal rates could result in a significantly higher or lower, respectively, calculation of our expected future payments to our Bank Partners, resulting in a higher or lower, respectively, fair value measurement of our FCR liability.
A significant increase or decrease in the discount rate could result in a lower or higher, respectively, fair value measurement of our FCR liability.
Charged-off receivables
Periodically,receivables.Historically, we transferhave periodically transferred our rights to certain Charged-Off Receivablespreviously charged-off loan receivables in exchange for a cash payment based on the expected recovery rate of such loan receivables, which consist primarily of previously charged-off Bank Partner loans. We have no continuing involvement with these Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables other than performing reasonable servicing and collection efforts on behalf of the third parties and Bank Partners that purchased the Charged-Off Receivables.efforts. The proceeds from transfers of Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables attributable to Bank Partner loans are recognized on a collected basis as reductions to cost of revenue, which reduces the fair value adjustment to the FCR liability in the period of transfer. The proceeds from transfers of charged-off receivables attributable to loan receivables held for sale are recognized on a collected basis as reductions to sales, general and administrative expense, which reduces the valuation allowance for loan receivables held for sale. There were no transfers of charged-off receivables during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. As such, we retain the economic rights to retained charged-off receivables and recognize recoveries on a collected basis each period.
The following table presents details of charged-off receivables transfers during the year ended December 31, 2019. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Unpaid Balance | | Proceeds |
Bank Partner
loans | | Loan
receivables
held for sale | | Total | | Bank Partner
loans | | Loan
receivables
held for sale | | Total |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | $ | 223,024 | | | $ | 2,518 | | | $ | 225,542 | | | $ | 29,190 | | | $ | 312 | | | $ | 29,502 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, $20.2 million, $23.0 million and $22.2 million, respectively, of the aggregate unpaid balance on cumulative transferred charged-off receivables were recovered through our servicing efforts on behalf of our charged-off receivables investors.
Term loan
The carrying value of our term loan is net of unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs. The fair value of our term loan is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the price is obtained from quoted market prices for similar liabilities in an active market.
Interest rate swap
In June 2019, we entered into a $350.0 million notional, four-year interest rate swap agreement to hedge changes in our cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on $350.0 million of our variable-rate term loan to a fixed-rate basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. This swap involves the receipt of variable-rate amounts in exchange for fixed interest rate payments over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the underlying notional amount and was designated for accounting purposes as a cash flow hedge. The interest rate swap is carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as the inputs to the derivative pricing model are generally observable and
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
do not contain a high level of subjectivity. The fair value was determined based on the FCR liabilitypresent value of the estimated future net cash flows using implied rates in the periodapplicable yield curve as of transfer.the valuation date. The following table presents details of Charged-Off Receivables transfers during the years indicated. There were no transfers of Charged-Off Receivables during the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Unpaid Balance | | Proceeds |
Bank Partner loans | | Loan receivables held for sale | | Total(1) | | Bank Partner loans | | Loan receivables held for sale | | Total |
| Year Ended December 31, 2018 | $ | 201,517 |
| | $ | 3,263 |
| | $ | 204,780 |
| | $ | 26,692 |
| | $ | 431 |
| | $ | 27,123 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | 197,114 |
| | 4,165 |
| | 201,279 |
| | 18,968 |
| | 406 |
| | 19,374 |
|
| |
(1)
| During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, $14,940 and $2,966, respectively, of the aggregate unpaid balance on cumulative transferred Charged-Off Receivables were recovered through our servicing efforts on behalf of our Charged-Off Receivables investors. |
Servicing liabilities
We electedchange in the fair value method to account for our servicing liabilities to more appropriately reflect the value of the obligationderivative instrument designated as a cash flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and later reclassified into earnings in ourthe same period when the hedged item affects earnings. The reclassification into earnings is reported within interest expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Statements of Operations.
As a result of this election, our servicing liabilitiesthe entering into the Merger Agreement described in Note 1 on September 14, 2021, the Company determined that it no longer met the criteria for cash flow hedge designation. Because hedge accounting is discontinued on a prospective basis, changes in the interest rate swap's fair value subsequent to that date are carriedrecognized in earnings. Amounts previously reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were reclassified to earnings as the previously hedged interest payments were made. In December 2021, the remaining balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was reclassified to earnings as the Company determined that the forecasted transactions were probable of not occurring. The Company settled the interest rate swap in December 2021.
Sales facilitation obligations
In May 2020, the Company entered into a series of agreements (collectively, the “Facility Bank Partner Agreements”) with an existing Bank Partner to provide for the programmatic sale of loan participations and whole loans by that Bank Partner to third parties. Under the Facility Bank Partner Agreements, purchasers issue purchase commitments to the Bank Partner. The Company has certain sales facilitation obligations related thereto that qualify as embedded derivatives and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As such, these sales facilitation obligations are recorded at fair value on a recurring basisand changes in their respective fair value are recorded within other liabilitiescost of revenue in the Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Operations.
First, the Company agreed under the Facility Bank Partner Agreements to facilitate sales by the Bank Partner of loan participations and are estimated usingwhole loans to third parties (including sales to the Company or its affiliates, including the Warehouse SPV) by funding into an escrow account, established by the Company for the Bank Partner, the shortfall (if any) in purchase price commitment below par (“purchase price discount”) at the time a discounted cash flow model. See Note 8 for additional information. Servicing liabilities arepurchase commitment is made. The Bank Partner agreed that it will fund into the escrow account any purchase price in excess of par (“purchase price premium”) received in connection with a sale. Any purchase price discount will net settle with any contemporaneous purchase price premiums upon sale of the loan participations or whole loans, with a net discount being settled by a release of escrow funds to the Bank Partner at sale and a net premium being settled by a release of excess escrow funds (above minimum escrow requirements), if any, to the Company shortly following any such sale.
Second, the Company may, from time to time, directly issue to the Bank Partner commitments to purchase loan participations at par under the Facility Bank Partner Agreements. The fair value of the resulting sales facilitation obligations is based on the difference between par and the anticipated sale prices of such participations to third parties, including institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources. As such, the fair value is classified within Level 32 of the fair value hierarchy, as the primary component of the fair valueprice is obtained from unobservable inputs based on peer market data, reasonably adjustedobservable values of loan receivables with similar terms and characteristics.
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 the Company had sales facilitation obligations for assumptions that would be used by market participants to service our transferred Charged-Off Receivables portfolios, for which market data is not available. Changes in the fair value of our servicing liabilities are recorded within other gains/(losses)the liability was $13.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively, related to the underlying Bank Partner loans of $625.0 million and $476.6 million, respectively. The change in fair value as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $2.6 million and $10.7 million, respectively, and is reflected in cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Significant assumptions used in valuing our servicing liabilities were as follows:
Discount rate: The discount rate reflects the time value of money adjusted for a risk premium and is within an observable range based on peer market data.
Recovery period: Our recovery period was determined based on a reasonable recovery period for loans of these sizes and characteristics based on historical experience. We assumed that collection efforts for these loans will cease after five years, and the run-off of the portfolio will follow a straight-line methodology, adjusted for actual cash recoveries over time.
The following table reconciles the beginning and ending fair value measurements of our servicing liabilities associated with transferring our rights to Charged-Off Receivables during the periods presented. There were no servicing liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 2,071 |
| | $ | — |
|
Initial obligation from transfer of Charged-Off Receivables(1) | | 2,461 |
| | 2,379 |
|
| Fair value changes recognized in other gains/(losses) | | | | |
| Change in inputs or assumptions used in the valuation model | | — |
| | — |
|
Other changes in fair value(1)(2) | | (1,516 | ) | | (308 | ) |
| Ending balance | | $ | 3,016 |
| | $ | 2,071 |
|
| |
(1)
| Recognized in other gains/(losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
| |
(2)
| Represents the reduction of our servicing liabilities due to the passage of time and collection of loan payments. |
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used to value the Level 3 servicing liabilities as of the dates presented.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Input | | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | Range | | Weighted Average | | Range | | Weighted Average |
| Cost of servicing (basis points) | | 62.5 |
| | 62.5 |
| | 62.5 |
| | 62.5 |
|
| Discount rate | | 18.0 | % | | 18.0 | % | | 18.0 | % | | 18.0 | % |
| Recovery period (years) | | 3.6 – 4.9 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 4.6 – 4.9 |
| | 4.8 |
|
The recovery period is weighted by the unpaid balance of previously transferred Charged-Off Receivables as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The recovery period reflects the length of time over which we expect to perform servicing activities and has an inverse correlation with the amount by which the servicing liability is reduced each reporting period. As such, a significant increase or decrease in the expected recovery period could have resulted in a higher or lower, respectively, servicing liability as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
A significant increase or decrease in the market cost of servicing could have resulted in a significantly higher or lower, respectively, servicing liability as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. We only use one cost of servicing assumption; therefore, the weighted average only includes a singular basis points cost of servicing.
Finally, a significant increase or decrease in the discount rate could have resulted in a lower or higher, respectively, servicing liability as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The discount rate impact on our servicing liability is much less compared to the recovery period and cost of servicing assumptions. We only use one discount rate assumption; therefore, the weighted average only includes a singular discount rate.
Financial guarantee
Under the terms of the contracts with our Bank Partners, we provide limited protection in the event of excessive Bank Partner portfolio credit losses and record a financial guarantee liability at fair value based on historical experience and the amount of current customer delinquencies expected to convert into Bank Partner portfolio credit losses. See Note 13 for additional information.
Note 4. Loan Receivables Held for Sale
The following table summarizes the activity in the balance of loan receivables held for sale, net at lower of cost or fair value during the periods indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 571,415 | | | $ | 51,926 | | | $ | 2,876 | |
Additions(1) | | 1,748,789 | | | 1,775,807 | | | 157,928 | |
Proceeds from sales and borrower payments(2) | | (2,277,258) | | | (1,181,867) | | | (104,858) | |
Loss on sale(3) | | (39,543) | | | (57,043) | | | — | |
Decrease (increase) in valuation allowance(4) | | 6,209 | | | (8,241) | | | (1,289) | |
Transfers(5) | | 3,436 | | | 344 | | | 251 | |
Write-offs and other(6) | | (7,728) | | | (9,511) | | | (2,982) | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 5,320 | | | $ | 571,415 | | | $ | 51,926 | |
(1)Includes purchases of $1,622 million and $1,114 million, respectively, participations in loans through the Warehouse SPV for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 73,606 |
| | $ | 41,268 |
| | $ | 1,843 |
|
| Additions | | 93,240 |
| | 134,659 |
| | 309,218 |
|
Proceeds from sales and customer payments(1) | | (161,009 | ) | | (93,044 | ) | | (262,903 | ) |
| Loss on sale | | — |
| | (500 | ) | | (907 | ) |
| Increase in valuation allowance | | (92 | ) | | (584 | ) | | — |
|
Transfers(2) | | 22 |
| | (5,017 | ) | | (4,092 | ) |
Write offs and other(3) | | (2,891 | ) | | (3,176 | ) | | (1,891 | ) |
| Ending balance | | $ | 2,876 |
| | $ | 73,606 |
| | $ | 41,268 |
|
| |
(1)
| Customer payments include accrued interest and fees, recoveries of previously charged-off loan receivables held for sale, as well as proceeds from transferring our rights to Charged-Off Receivables attributable to loan receivables held for sale. We retain servicing arrangements on sold loan receivables with the same terms and conditions as loans that are originated by our Bank Partners. Income from loan receivables held for sale activities is recorded within interest income and other gains/(losses) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We sold loan receivables held for sale to certain Bank Partners on the following dates during the years indicated: |
GreenSky, Inc.(2)We retain servicing arrangements on sold loan receivables with comparable terms and conditions as loans that are not participated by our Bank Partners. Additions also include accrued interest and fees, recoveries of previously charged-off loan receivables held for sale, as well as proceeds from transferring our rights to charged-off receivables attributable to loan receivables held for sale. Income from loan receivables held for sale activities is recorded within interest and other revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)(3)Recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(Dollars(4)Valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes a decrease in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)lower of cost or fair value adjustments on our Warehouse Loan Participations of $3.2 million, partially offset by lower of cost or fair value adjustments on all other loan receivables held for sale of $301 thousand. Valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2020 includes an increase in lower of cost or fair value adjustments on our Warehouse Loan Participations of $6.2 million and an increase in lower of cost or fair value adjustments on all other loan receivables held for sale of $109 thousand. Provision for credit losses decreased $3.3 million, and increased $1.9 million and $1.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
(5)We temporarily hold certain loan receivables, which are originated by a Bank Partner, while non-originating Bank Partner eligibility is being determined. Once we determine that a loan receivable meets the investment requirements of an eligible Bank Partner, we transfer the loan receivable to the Bank Partner at cost plus any accrued interest. The reported amount also includes loan receivables that have been placed on non-accrual and non-payment status while we investigate consumer inquiries.
(6)We received recovery payments of $376 thousand, $399 thousand and $50 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Recoveries of principal and finance charges and fees on previously written off loan receivables held for sale are recognized on a collected basis, and the cash proceeds received are recorded within sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Date | | Amount | | Date | | Amount | | Date | | Amount |
| May 21 | | $ | 9,552 |
| | June 29 | | $ | 17,900 |
| | May 12 | | $ | 28,392 |
|
| June 27 | | 50,614 |
| | December 21 | | 54,171 |
| | September 29 | | 20,263 |
|
| September 27 | | 48,176 |
| | | | | | November 30 | | 19,990 |
|
| December 20 | | 30,684 |
| | | | | | December 16 | | 33,621 |
|
| | | | | | | | | December 23 | | 139,004 |
|
| Total | | $ | 139,026 |
| | | | $ | 72,071 |
| | | | $ | 241,270 |
|
| |
(2)
| We temporarily hold certain loan receivables, which are originated by a Bank Partner, while non-originating Bank Partner eligibility is being determined. Once we determine that a loan receivable meets the investment requirements of an eligible Bank Partner, we transfer the loan receivable to the Bank Partner at cost plus any accrued interest. The reported amount also includes loan receivables that have been placed on non-accrual and non-payment status while we investigate consumer inquiries. |
| |
(3)
| We received recovery payments of $57, $238 and $116 during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Recoveries of principal and finance charges and fees on previously written off loan receivables held for sale are recognized on a collected basis as other gains and interest income, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Separately, during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, write offs and other were reduced by $431 and $406, respectively, related to cash proceeds received from transferring our rights to Charged-Off Receivables attributable to loan receivables held for sale. The cash proceeds received were recorded within other income/(expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
The following table presents activities associated with our loan receivable sales and servicing activities during the yearsperiods indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Gain/(loss) on sold loan receivables held for sale | | $ | — |
| | $ | (500 | ) | | $ | (907 | ) |
| Cash Flows | | | | | | |
| Sales of loans | | $ | 139,026 |
| | $ | 72,071 |
| | $ | 241,270 |
|
| Servicing fees | | 2,321 |
| | 2,821 |
| | 1,672 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Gain (loss) on sold loan receivables | | $ | (39,543) | | | $ | (57,043) | | | $ | — | |
| Cash Flows | | | | | | |
| Sales of loans | | $ | 1,897,890 | | | $ | 875,051 | | | $ | 91,946 | |
| Servicing fees | | 18,187 | | | 5,978 | | | 3,901 | |
The following table presentstables present information as of the dates indicated about the principal balances of sold loan receivables held for sale that were transferred and qualified for sales treatment under ASC 860, and therefore are notno longer recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, but with which we have a continuing involvement through our servicing arrangements with our Bank Partners. Thearrangements. As such, for sold loan receivables are pooled with other loans originated byheld for sale where servicing is the Bank Partners for purposesonly form of determining escrow balancescontinuing involvement, the Company would only experience a loss if it were required to repurchase a loan participation due to a breach in representations and incentive payments. The escrow balances represent our only direct exposure to potential losses associated with these sold loan receivables.warranties
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Total principal balance | $ | 357,060 |
| | $ | 305,748 |
|
| Delinquent loans (unpaid principal balance) | 23,385 |
| | 20,409 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net charge-offs (unpaid principal balance) | | $ | 11,355 |
| | $ | 8,574 |
| | 4,545 |
|
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
associated with its loan sale or servicing contracts. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Total principal balance | $ | 2,132,603 | | | $ | 1,061,634 | |
| Delinquent loans (unpaid principal balance) | 49,762 | | | 29,092 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net charge-offs (unpaid principal balance) | | $ | 21,441 | | | $ | 10,573 | | | $ | 16,333 | |
In November 2021, as provided for as a condition to the Merger Agreement, the Company entered into a backstop purchase facility arrangement with Goldman Sachs Bank. This agreement includes (i) a forward flow commitment from Goldman Sachs Bank to purchase up to $800 million in loan participations during the period from the execution of such arrangements through the earlier of the consummation of the Mergers or the termination of the Merger Agreement, and (ii) in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms prior to the consummation of the Mergers, up to $1.0 billion in loan participations during the period from the Merger Agreement termination date through the last day of the ninth full calendar month following such termination date. Pursuant to this arrangement, the Company sold $226.2 million in loan participations in December 2021.
Note 5. Accounts Receivable
As of December 31, 2021, our allowance for losses on accounts receivable was measured under ASC 326. Historically, the majority of our pools of accounts receivable did not have write-offs. For the pool of accounts receivable for which we had historical write-offs, we used an aging method and the average 12-month historical loss rate as a basis for estimating credit losses on the current accounts receivable balance. In the absence of relevant historical loss experience for the other pools of accounts receivables, we also used this average 12-month loss rate to inform our estimate of credit losses on those balances. For each pool of accounts receivable, we considered the conditions at the measurement date and reasonable and supportable forecasts about future conditions to consider if adjustments to the historical loss rate were warranted. Given (i) our methods of collecting funds on merchant and servicing receivables, (ii) we have not observed meaningful changes in our counterparties' abilities to pay, and (iii) we establish an allowance for all delinquent accounts receivable (typically deemed to be 31 days or more past due), providing for a maximum 30-day term of our accounts receivable balances, we determined that our historical loss rates remain most indicative of our lifetime expected losses.
Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts
Receivable,
Gross | | Allowance
for
Uncollectible Amounts | | Accounts
Receivable,
Net |
| December 31, 2021 | | | | | |
| Transaction related | $ | 6,916 | | | $ | (150) | | | $ | 6,766 | |
| Servicing related | 12,339 | | | — | | | 12,339 | |
| Total | $ | 19,255 | | | $ | (150) | | | $ | 19,105 | |
| December 31, 2020 | | | | | |
| Transaction related | $ | 10,533 | | | $ | (313) | | | $ | 10,220 | |
| Servicing related | 11,738 | | | — | | | 11,738 | |
| Total | $ | 22,271 | | | $ | (313) | | | $ | 21,958 | |
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Accounts Receivable, Gross | | Allowance for Losses | | Accounts Receivable, Net |
| December 31, 2018 | | | | | |
| Transaction related | $ | 14,704 |
| | $ | (168 | ) | | $ | 14,536 |
|
| Servicing related | 864 |
| | — |
| | 864 |
|
| Total | $ | 15,568 |
| | $ | (168 | ) | | $ | 15,400 |
|
| December 31, 2017 | | | | | |
| Transaction related | $ | 15,997 |
| | $ | (276 | ) | | $ | 15,721 |
|
| Servicing related | 2,637 |
| | — |
| | 2,637 |
|
| Total | $ | 18,634 |
| | $ | (276 | ) | | $ | 18,358 |
|
| | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 |
| Beginning balance | $ | (313) | |
| Provision for expected losses | (35) | |
| Write-offs | 201 | |
| Recoveries | (3) | |
| Ending balance | $ | (150) | |
Note 6. Property, Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software were as follows as of the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Software | $ | 39,061 | | | $ | 30,641 | |
| Furniture | 1,428 | | | 2,680 | |
| Leasehold improvements | 3,817 | | | 4,399 | |
| Computer hardware | 2,663 | | | 2,690 | |
| Total property, equipment and software, at cost | 46,969 | | | 40,410 | |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (5,356) | | | (6,580) | |
| Less: accumulated amortization | (18,226) | | | (12,378) | |
| Total property, equipment and software, net | $ | 23,387 | | | $ | 21,452 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Furniture | $ | 2,813 |
| | $ | 2,704 |
|
| Leasehold improvements | 4,171 |
| | 3,659 |
|
| Computer hardware | 2,923 |
| | 2,987 |
|
| Software | 8,344 |
| | 4,836 |
|
| Total property, equipment and software, at cost | 18,251 |
| | 14,186 |
|
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (5,462 | ) | | (4,060 | ) |
| Less: accumulated amortization | (2,557 | ) | | (2,278 | ) |
| Total property, equipment and software, net | $ | 10,232 |
| | $ | 7,848 |
|
The following table shows depreciation and amortization expense during the years presented, as well as losses on abandoned property, equipment and software andthat is recorded impairment losses related to abandoned capitalized software projects that are recorded within sales, general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We determined that these software projects would not generate future cash flows through use or disposal to a third party and, as such, the fair value as of the respective reporting dates was $0. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Depreciation expense | $ | 1,953 | | | $ | 2,629 | | | $ | 2,540 | |
| Amortization expense | 12,092 | | | 8,701 | | | 4,764 | |
| Impairment losses | — | | | 188 | | | — | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Depreciation expense | $ | 2,320 |
| | $ | 2,149 |
| | $ | 1,757 |
|
| Amortization expense | 2,158 |
| | 1,834 |
| | 1,951 |
|
| Impairment losses | 19 |
| | 78 |
| | 107 |
|
| Losses on abandonment | — |
| | — |
| | 44 |
|
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The estimated future amortization of software is as follows as of the date indicated. | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2021 |
| 2022 | | $ | 11,155 | |
| 2023 | | 6,996 | |
| 2024 | | 2,684 | |
| Total | | $ | 20,835 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2018 |
| 2019 | | $ | 2,574 |
|
| 2020 | | 2,229 |
|
| 2021 | | 984 |
|
| Total | | $ | 5,787 |
|
Note 7. Borrowings
Credit Agreement
In August 2017, we entered into a $450.0 million credit agreement (“("Credit Agreement”Agreement"), which provided for a $350.0 million term loan (“("original term loan”loan") maturing on August 25, 2024 and a $100.0 million revolving loan facility maturing on August 25, 2022.
Original term loan. The original term loan incurred interest, due quarterly in arrears, at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which represented the one-month LIBOR rate multiplied by the statutory reserve rate, as defined in the Credit Agreement, plus a margin
The net proceeds from the term loan of $338.6 million, along with $7.9 million of cash, were set aside for a subsequent $346.5 million payment (which is occurring in stages) to certain equity holders and a related party. With the exception of the payments to the related party, which are related party expenses, the payments were accounted for as distributions. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we made distributions of $4.3 million and payments to the related party of $0.6 million. The remaining reserved payment of $5.5 million as of December 31, 2018 was included within other liabilities and related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 14 for further discussion of related party transactions.
The distribution to GS Holdings unit holders and GS Holdings holders of profits interests was made on a basis generally proportionate to their equity interests in GS Holdings. GS Holdings' members approved the Credit Agreement and the distribution of the proceeds of the original term loan to the GS Holdings unit holders, holders of profits interests and a related party. The purpose of the distribution was to provide a cash return on investment to the GS Holdings members and holders of profits interests.
Revolving loan facility. Under the revolving loan facility, revolving loans incur interest at our election at either (i) a base rate, which represents, for any day, a rate per annum equal to the greater of (a) the prime rate on such day, (b) the federal funds rate on such day plus 0.50%, and (c) the adjusted LIBOR for a one-month interest period on such day plus 1.00%, plus a margin of 3.00% per annum or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate, as discussed below, plus a margin of 4.00% per annum. If our first lien net leverage ratio, as discussed further below, is equal to or below 1.50 to 1.00, these interest margins are reduced to 2.75% and 3.75% for base rate loans and Eurodollar loans, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, we had no borrowings under the revolving loan facility.
We are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a per annum rate of 0.50% on the daily unused amount of the revolving loan facility, inclusive of the aggregate amount available to be drawn under letters of credit, of which $10.0 million was available, but unused, as of December 31, 2018 as discussed further below. This rate is reduced to 0.375% for any quarterly period in which our first lien net leverage ratio is equal to or below 1.50 to 1.00. For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we recognized $411 and $175, respectively, of commitment fees within interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
2018 Amended Credit Agreement
In March 2018, we amended certain terms of our Credit Agreement ("2018 Amended Credit Agreement"). The term loan and revolving loan facility under the Amended Credit Agreement are collectively referred to as the "Credit Facility."
Term loan. The2018 Amended Credit Agreement replaced the original term loan with a $400.0 million term loan (“modified term loan”) and extended the maturity date to March 29, 2025. Further, the interest margin on the modified term loan was reduced to 3.25% per annum.
We contemporaneously settled the outstanding principal balance on the original term loan of $349.1 million with the issuance of the $400.0 million modified term loan. An original issuance discount of $1.0 million was reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a direct deduction from the face amount of the modified term loan. Therefore, the gross proceeds of the modified term loan were $399.0 million. The proceeds from the modified term loan were primarily used to repay the outstanding principal balance on the original term loan and to pay $1.1 million of third party costs, including legal and debt arrangement costs, which were immediately expensed and recorded within general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on the modification date. The remaining $48.8 million of proceeds were used to provide for distributions to certain equity holders and a related party prior to the IPO. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we made distributions of $47.0 million. The remaining reserved payment of $1.8 million as of December 31, 2018 was included within other liabilities and related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 14 for further discussion of related party transactions.
Key details of the term loans are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31,(1) |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Term loan, face value(2) | | $ | 397,000 |
| | $ | 349,125 |
|
Unamortized debt discount(3) | | (3,728 | ) | | (3,321 | ) |
Unamortized debt issuance costs(3) | | (6,450 | ) | | (7,541 | ) |
| Term loan | | $ | 386,822 |
| | $ | 338,263 |
|
| |
(1)
| Amounts reflect details of the original term loan as of December 31, 2017, and details of the modified term loan as of December 31, 2018. |
| |
(2)
| The principal balance of the original term loan was scheduled to be repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter. We made the first principal payment in December 2017. The principal balance of the modified term loan is scheduled to be repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter, with the balance due at maturity. We made the first principal payment on the modified term loan in June 2018. For each of the next five years, principal repayments on the modified term loan are expected to be $4,000. |
| |
(3)
| For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, $593 and $180, respectively, of debt discount and $1,091 and $408, respectively, of debt issuance costs were amortized into interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Giving effect to the amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs on the term loan, the effective interest rates were 5.99% and 5.74% during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
Revolving loan facility.Under the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement, the maturity date of the $100.0$100 million revolving loan facility was extended to March 29, 2023. Further, the interest margin applied to revolving loans that incur interest at a base rate was modified to 2.00% per annum and the margin applied to revolving loans that incur interest at an adjusted LIBOR rate was modified to 3.00% per annum. However, if our first lien net leverage ratio is equal to or above 1.50 to 1.00, these interest margins are raised to 2.25% and 3.25%, respectively. As of December 31, 2018,2021 and December 31, 2020, we had no borrowings under the revolving loan facility. Lastly, the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement provided for a $10.0 million letter of credit, which, to the extent drawn upon, would reduce the amount of availability under the revolving loan facility by the same amount. We did not draw onNo amounts were drawn under our available letter of credit as of December 31, 2018. The Credit Agreement2021.
We are subject to a quarterly commitment fee ratesbased on the daily unused amount of the revolving loan facility, (inclusiveinclusive of the letteraggregate amount available to be drawn under letters of credit)credit, of which $10.0 million was available, but unused, as of December 31, 2021. The quarterly commitment fee rate is 0.50% per annum when our first lien net leverage ratio is above 1.50 to 1.0, but is reduced to 0.375% for any quarterly period in which our first lien net leverage ratio is equal to or below 1.50 to 1.0. For the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, we recognized $506 thousand, $482 thousand and $348 thousand, respectively, of commitment fees within interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
2020 Amended Credit Agreement
In June 2020, we entered into a second amendment to our Credit Agreement ("2020 Amended Credit Agreement"), which provided for an additional $75.0 million term loan ("incremental term loan"). The term loan and revolving loan facility under the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement and incremental term loan under the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement are collectively referred to as disclosed above,the "Credit Facility," and the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement and the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement are collectively referred to as the "Amended Credit Agreement." The modified term loan and the incremental term loan are collectively referred to as the "term loan." The incremental term loan incurs interest, due monthly in arrears, at an adjusted LIBOR rate, which represents the one-month LIBOR rate multiplied by the statutory reserve rate, as defined in the 2020 Amended Credit Agreement, with a 1% LIBOR floor, plus 450 basis points. The incremental term loan has the same security, maturity, principal amortization, prepayment, and covenant terms as the 2018 Amended Credit Agreement, maturing on March 29, 2025.
An original issuance discount of $3.0 million was reported as a direct deduction from the face amount of the incremental term loan. Fees paid to the lender of $1.5 million were not changed.deferred over the remaining life of the term loan on the modification date. Therefore, the initial gross proceeds of the incremental term loan were $70.5 million. The proceeds from the incremental term loan were used to pay third party costs, including legal fees, which were immediately expensed on the modification date. The remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes and to enhance the Company's overall liquidity position.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Key details of the term loan are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
Term loan, face value(1) | | $ | 458,875 | | | $ | 463,625 | |
Unamortized debt discount(2) | | (3,918) | | | (5,153) | |
Unamortized debt issuance costs(2) | | (4,307) | | | (5,666) | |
| Term loan | | $ | 450,650 | | | $ | 452,806 | |
Covenants(1)The principal balance of the term loan is scheduled to be repaid on a quarterly basis at an amortization rate of 0.25% per quarter through December 31, 2024, with the balance due at maturity. For each of the next three years, principal repayments on the term loan are expected to be $4.8 million.
(2)For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, debt discount of $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, and debt issuance costs of $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, were amortized into interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Giving effect to the amortization of debt discount and debt issuance costs on the term loan, the effective interest rates were 5.58% and 5.66% during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Covenants.The Amended Credit Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants with which we must comply. The financial covenant requires a first lien net leverage ratio equal to or below 3.50 to 1.00 for any measurement date at which the principal amounts of outstanding revolving loans and letters of credit exceed 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the revolving loan facility. The first lien net leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of (i) the aggregate principal amount of indebtedness, minus the aggregate amount of consolidated cash (exclusive of restricted cash), as of the measurement date to (ii) consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, for the four prior quarters.
The non-financial covenants include, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens and fundamental changes to the business (such as acquisitions, mergers, liquidations or changes in the nature of the business, asset dispositions, restricted payments, transactions with affiliates and other customary matters).
The Amended Credit Agreement also includes various negative covenants, including one that restricts GS Holdings from making non-tax distributions unless certain financial tests are met. In general, GS Holdings is restricted from making distributions unless (a) after giving effect to the distribution it would have, as of a measurement date, a total net leverage ratio of no more than 3.00 to 1.00, and (b) the source of such distributions is retained excess cash flow, certain equity issuance proceeds and certain other sources.
We were in compliance with all such covenants, both financial and non-financial, as of December 31, 20182021 and 2017.
The Amended Credit Agreement defines events of default, the breach of which could require early payment of all borrowings under, and termination of, the Amended Credit Agreement or similar actions.2020.
Any borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries. Further, the lenders have a security interest in substantially all of thecertain assets of GS Holdings and the other guarantors thereunder.
Initial Credit FacilityInterest Rate Swap
On February 10, 2017, GSLLCIn June 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement (“Initial Creditto hedge changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on $350.0 million of our variable-rate term loan. This interest rate swap was initially designated for accounting purposes as a cash flow hedge, but that designation was discontinued as of September 14, 2021, and the interest rate swap was settled in December 2021. See Note 8 for additional derivative disclosures.
Warehouse Facility Agreement”
In May 2020, the Warehouse SPV entered into a warehouse credit agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMorgan"), as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto from time to time ("Warehouse Facility Lenders") for a two-year, $50.0 million bankto establish an asset-backed revolving credit facility (“Initial Credit Facility”to finance purchases by the Warehouse SPV of participation interests in loans originated through the GreenSky program (the "Warehouse Facility"), which. The Warehouse Facility initially provided a revolving committed financing of $300.0 million, with an additional $200.0 million uncommitted accordion that was expandable, upon our requestsubsequently accessed in July 2020. The revolving funding period is one year and successful syndication, to $100.0 million.the initial maturity date was May 10, 2022. The Initial Creditinterest rate on the Class A loans under the Warehouse Facility Agreement also allowed us to requestis a fixed spread over the issuanceapplicable commercial paper conduit funding rate (or, if the Warehouse Facility Lenders do not fund their advances under the Warehouse Facility through commercial paper markets, 3-month LIBOR plus 0.50%). The Warehouse SPV paid various other legal and banking fees associated with obtaining the
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States dollars as the applicant thereof for the support of our or our subsidiaries’ obligations. InDollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
financing in conjunction with the Credit Agreement, on August 25, 2017, we terminatedclosing of the Initial CreditWarehouse Facility atin May 2020, including upfront fees of approximately $0.5 million which time we had no borrowingsare deferred over the life of the Warehouse Facility.
Amended Warehouse Facility
In December 2020, the Warehouse Facility was amended (the "Amended Warehouse Facility") to increase the amount of the Warehouse Facility’s revolving commitment from $300 million to $555.0 million, including $500.0 million under the facility, nor requestsClass A commitment and $55.0 million under the Class B commitment. The Amended Warehouse Facility established terms for lettersthe Class B commitment (including the advance rate for the Class B loans and an interest rate on the Class B loans under the Warehouse Facility equal to a fixed spread over 1-month LIBOR), and extended the commitment termination date to December 17, 2021 and the maturity date to December 17, 2023. The commitment termination was subsequently extended to March 31, 2022 and the maturity date was contemporaneously amended to March 31, 2023. The Amended Warehouse Facility also established the fee for unused Class B commitments. The Warehouse SPV paid various other legal and banking fees in December 2020 associated with the Amended Warehouse Facility, including upfront fees, of credit.approximately $1.6 million which were deferred over the remaining life of the Amended Warehouse Facility. The Warehouse Facility and the Amended Warehouse Facility are collectively referred to as the "Warehouse Facility."
As of December 31, 2021, there was no outstanding loan balance on the Warehouse Facility. The Warehouse Facility is secured by the loan participations held by the Warehouse SPV, and Warehouse Facility Lenders do not have direct recourse to the Company for any loans made under the Warehouse Facility. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we amortized $785 thousand and $358 thousand, respectively, of these fees into cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company is subject to a fee based on a percentage of the total financing commitment that remains unused. For the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, we recordedrecognized $1.9 million of unused commitment fees on the daily unused amountwithin cost of each lender’s commitment under the Initial Credit Facility of $159, which were recorded within interest expenserevenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Further, we recorded up-frontUnused commitment fees during the year ended December 31, 2020 were immaterial.
The Warehouse SPV's ability to utilize the Warehouse Facility is subject to the Warehouse SPV's compliance with various covenants and other feesrequirements of the warehouse credit agreement. In 2021, the Warehouse SPV entered into a $555.0 million notional amortizing interest rate cap agreement to meet covenant provisions per the Amended Warehouse Facility. The failure to comply with such requirements may result in events of default, the accelerated repayment of amounts owed under the Warehouse Facility (often referred to as an early amortization event), a decrease in the borrowing base advance rate, an increase in the interest payable on the loans and/or the termination of the Warehouse Facility. As of December 31, 2021, the Warehouse SPV was in compliance with these covenants.
Note 8. Derivative Instruments
The Company does not hold or use derivative instruments for trading purposes.
Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedges
Interest rate fluctuations expose our variable-rate term loan to changes in interest expense and cash flows. As part of our risk management strategy, we may use interest rate derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.
In June 2019, we entered into a $350.0 million notional, four-year interest rate swap agreement to hedge changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on $350.0 million of our variable-rate term loan, which matures on March 29, 2025. This agreement involved the receipt of variable-rate amounts in exchange for fixed interest rate payments at 1.80% over the life of the agreement, which terminates on June 30, 2023, without an exchange of the underlying notional amount. This interest rate swap was designated for accounting purposes as a cash flow hedge. As such, changes in the interest rate swap’s fair value were deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in each period that a hedged interest payment was made on our variable-rate term loan.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
As a result of entering into the Merger Agreement described in Note 1 on September 14, 2021, the Company determined that it no longer met the criteria for cash flow hedge designation. Because hedge accounting is discontinued on a prospective basis, changes in the interest rate swap's fair value subsequent to that date were recognized in earnings. Amounts previously reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were reclassified to earnings as the previously hedged interest payments were made. In December 2021, the remaining balance in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was reclassified to earnings as the Company determined that the forecasted transactions were probable of not occurring. The Company settled the interest rate swap in December 2021.
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Hedges
The FCR component of our Bank Partner contracts qualifies as an embedded derivative. The FCR liability is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and, as such, changes in its fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 for additional information on finance charge reversals.
As part of the Facility Bank Partner Agreements, the Company has certain sales facilitation obligations that qualify as embedded derivatives and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. As such, changes in their fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 for additional information on sales facilitation obligations.
The contingent consideration receivables resulting from certain sales of loan participations to institutional investors, financial institutions and other funding sources serve as a host contract containing an embedded derivative. In accordance with ASC 825, the Company irrevocably elected to initially and subsequently measure the contingent consideration receivables as a whole, inclusive of the embedded derivative, at fair value. The fair value of the contingent consideration receivables will vary depending on the amount of cash the Company expects to ultimately receive, but can never be less than $0 and at no point will the Company be required to make a payment to settle this derivative. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration receivables are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 for additional information on contingent consideration receivables.
In January 2021, as required under the Warehouse Facility, the Warehouse SPV entered into a $555.0 million notional amortizing interest rate cap agreement to protect against changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate risk on the variable-rate Warehouse Facility to the extent three-month LIBOR exceeds 2.5%. The interest rate cap has a maturity date of December 18, 2023. The interest rate cap is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes and, as such, changes in its fair value are recorded within cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 3 for additional information on the interest rate cap.
On September 14, 2021, as a result of the entering into of the Merger Agreement described in Note 1, the Company determined that it no longer met the criteria for cash flow hedge designation for an interest rate swap agreement. As such, as of September 30, 2021, this interest rate swap agreement was no longer designated as a hedge. The interest rate swap was settled in December 2021. Please see "Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedges" in this Note 8 for additional information related to the terms of this interest rate swap agreement.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Derivative Instruments on our Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents the fair values and Consolidated Balance Sheets locations of our derivative instruments as of the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, |
| Balance Sheet Location | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Designated as cash flow hedges | | | | |
| Interest rate swap | Other liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | 14,182 | |
| Not designated as hedges | | | | | |
| FCR liability | Finance charge reversal liability | | $ | 143,529 | | | $ | 185,134 | |
| Sales facilitation obligations | Other liabilities | | 13,258 | | | 10,655 | |
| Contingent consideration receivables | Other assets | | 14,617 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Interest rate cap | Other assets | | 493 | | | — | |
The following table presents the impacts of our derivative instruments on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Not designated as hedges | | | | | |
| FCR liability – change in fair value recorded in cost of revenue | $ | 72,443 | | | $ | 147,018 | | | $ | 170,368 | |
| Sales facilitation obligations - change in fair value recorded in cost of revenue | 2,603 | | | 10,655 | | | — | |
| Contingent consideration receivables - change in fair value recorded in cost of revenue | 14,617 | | | — | | | — | |
| Interest rate swap - gain (loss) reclassified into interest expense | $ | (12,302) | | | $ | (4,057) | | | $ | 441 | |
| Interest rate swap - change in fair value recorded in other gains (losses) | 1,902 | | | — | | | — | |
| Interest rate swap - loss reclassified into other gains (losses) as the forecasted transaction is probable of not occurring | (8,683) | | | — | | | — | |
| Interest rate swap - gain (loss) reclassified into income tax expense | 1,386 | | | 385 | | | (38) | |
| Interest rate cap - change in fair value recorded in cost of revenue | 493 | | | — | | | — | |
Our derivative instrument activities are included within operating cash flows in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table summarizes the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) associated with our cash flow hedge, which exclude amounts pertaining to noncontrolling interests, for the Initial Credit Facility withinyears presented. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| Cash Flow Hedge | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), beginning balance | | $ | (4,340) | | | $ | (756) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications and tax | | 59 | | | (6,324) | |
| Tax (expense) benefit | | (11) | | | 1,540 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax | | 48 | | | (4,784) | |
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(1) | | 4,292 | | | 1,200 | |
| Net (increase) decrease in other comprehensive loss | | 4,340 | | | (3,584) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), ending balance | | $ | — | | | $ | (4,340) | |
(1)Net of tax benefit (expense) of $1,386 thousand and $385 thousand during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Note 9. Other Assets and Liabilities
The following table details the components of other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets which were amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining termas of the Initial Credit Facility into interest expense indates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
Servicing assets(1) | $ | 54,869 | | | $ | 30,804 | |
Right-of-use assets(2) | 11,792 | | | 8,265 | |
Prepaid expenses(3) | 8,078 | | | 8,860 | |
| Related party receivables | 50 | | | 88 | |
| | | |
| Contingent consideration receivables | 14,617 | | | — | |
Other receivables and assets(4) | 10,716 | | | 4,626 | |
| Other assets | $ | 100,122 | | | $ | 52,643 | |
(1)We elected the Consolidated Statementsfair value method to account for our servicing assets. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.
(2)Right-of-use ("ROU") assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term. Refer to Note 14 for additional information.
(3)Includes $1.0 million and $1.2 million of Operations. Forimplementation costs related to a new cloud computing arrangement which is categorized as a hosting arrangement that is a service contract under ASU 2018-15 as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amortization for the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded $992021 is $201 thousand and accumulated amortization as of amortizationDecember 31, 2021 is $209 thousand.
(4)Includes $6.1 million of such fees within interest expense inmerchant and sponsor incentive assets that are attributed as a contra-revenue adjustment to transaction revenue as the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We incurred debt extinguishment costs of $254 duringpromised goods or services are transferred to the customers over the contract terms. Amortization for the year ended December 31, 2017 upon termination2021 was $561 thousand.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 8. Other Liabilities
The following table details the components of other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Transaction processing liabilities | $ | 34,065 | | | $ | 30,169 | |
Servicing liabilities(1) | 12,276 | | | 1,984 | |
| Distributions payable | 1,570 | | | 3,136 | |
Interest rate swap(2) | — | | | 14,182 | |
Tax related liabilities(3) | 538 | | | 691 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 13,409 | | | 10,107 | |
| | | |
| Accruals and other liabilities | 8,132 | | | 10,245 | |
Sales facilitation obligations(4) | 13,258 | | | 10,655 | |
| Other liabilities | $ | 83,248 | | | $ | 81,169 | |
GreenSky, Inc.(1)We elected the fair value method to account for our servicing liabilities. Refer to Note 3 for additional information.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)(2)Refer to Note 3 and Note 8 for additional information on our interest rate swap.
(Dollars(3)Tax related liabilities primarily include certain taxes payable related to the Reorganization Transactions.
(4)Changes in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)the fair value of the embedded derivative for loan participation commitments are recognized as a mark-to-market in cost of revenue for the period.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Deferred lease liabilities | $ | 2,489 |
| | $ | 2,819 |
|
| Transaction processing liabilities | 4,958 |
| | 16,435 |
|
Servicing liabilities(1) | 3,016 |
| | 2,071 |
|
Distributions payable(2) | 10,066 |
| | 13,189 |
|
Tax related liabilities(3) | 4,412 |
| | — |
|
| Accruals and other liabilities | 10,736 |
| | 4,327 |
|
| Total other liabilities | $ | 35,677 |
| | $ | 38,841 |
|
| |
(1)
| Refer to Note 3 for additional information on servicing liabilities.
|
| |
(2)
| Related party distributions payable are not included in this balance, but rather are included within related party liabilities. |
| |
(3)
| Tax related liabilities primarily related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 12 for additional information on tax related liabilities.
|
Note 9.10. Noncontrolling Interests
GreenSky, Inc. is the sole managing member of GS Holdings and consolidates the financial results of GS Holdings. Therefore, the Company reports a noncontrolling interest based on the common units of GS Holdings held by the Continuing LLC Members. Changes in GreenSky, Inc.’s ownership interest in GS Holdings, while GreenSky, Inc. retains its controlling interest in GS Holdings, are accounted for as equity transactions. As such, future redemptions or direct exchanges of Holdco Units by the Continuing LLC Members (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a 1-for-one basis will result in a change in ownership and reduce or increase the amount recorded as noncontrolling interest and increase or decrease additional paid-in capital whencapital. The Company consolidates the financial results of GS Holdings has positive or negativeand reports a noncontrolling interest in its Consolidated Financial Statements representing the GS Holdings interests held by Continuing LLC Members. The weighted average ownership percentages for the applicable reporting periods are used to attribute net assets, respectively.
As ofincome (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss) to the Company and the noncontrolling interests. During the years ended December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, GreenSky, Inc. had 54,504,902a weighted average ownership interest in GS Holdings of 43.1% and 38.3%, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, an aggregate of 37 million Holdco Units were exchanged by the Continuing LLC Members (with automatic cancellation of Class B common stock) for 37 million newly-issued shares of Class A common stock outstanding,and 2.3 million shares of Class A restricted stock were issued, which resulted in an equivalent amount of ownership of Holdco Units. Adjusted for unvested Holdco Units, GreenSky, Inc. had a 30.0% economicincreased our total ownership interest in GS Holdings as ofto 62%. During the year ended December 31, 2018.2020, an aggregate of 7 million Holdco Units were exchanged by the Continuing LLC Members (with automatic cancellation of Class B common stock) for 7 million newly-issued shares of Class A common stock and 3.5 million shares of Class A restricted stock were issued, which increased our total ownership interest in GS holdings to 42.0%.
Note 10. Permanent11. Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
Historical information prior to the Reorganization Transactions has been restated below to account for a 10 to 1 stock split that occurred immediately prior to the IPO in connection with the Reorganization Transactions.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Treasury Stock
During 2018, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $150 million of the Company's Class A common stock. Repurchases may beUnder the repurchase program, repurchases were made at management's discretion from time to time on the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program has no time limit and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time. The repurchased shares are held in a treasury account using the cost method. The repurchase program was terminated in 2019.
Our treasury account also includes issuedClass A common stock related to restricted stock awards that were forfeited by the award recipient. The Company does not pay any consideration to reacquire these shares. See Note 1112 for further discussion of our restricted stock awards.
As of December 31, 2018, total2021, there were 15,747,203 shares of Class A common stock held in treasury, including: (i) purchases of 13,425,688 shares were 4,692,961, including repurchases of 4,681,211 sharesClass A common stock at a cost of $43.9$146.1 million, and 11,750(ii) 1,611,348 shares associated with forfeited restricted Class A commonstock awards, and (iii) 710,167 shares associated with tax withholdings upon vesting of restricted stock awards. Upon reissuance of any treasury shares, the Company uses a first-in, first-out approach. There were no reissuances of treasury shares during the yearyears ended December 31, 2018.2021, 2020 and 2019.
Warrants
On October 29, 2015, we issued warrants to a GSLLC (and subsequently GS Holdings) Class A member, which was also an affiliate of one of the members of the former GSLLC board of managers, to purchase up to
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
100,000 Class A units of GS Holdings (equal to 0.1% of the issued and outstanding units as of that date). During 2017, all 100,000 of these warrants were exercised for GS Holdings Class A units.
On January 1, 2014, we issued warrants to an affiliate of one of the members of the former GSLLC board of managers to purchase up to 1,304,640 Class A units of GSLLC (and subsequently GS Holdings) (equal to 0.8% of the issued and outstanding units as of that date). The exercise price of the warrants was $1.08 per Class A unit subject to adjustments, including for unit splits, combinations and reclassifications. The warrants vested ratably over five years and would have expired on December 31, 2023. In December 2017, these warrants were capped at $11.42 and 1,304,640 companion profits interests were issued at a threshold value of $11.42. We evaluated this modification in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, and determined that there was no incremental share-based compensation expense to recognize as a result of this modification.
As part of the Reorganization Transactions, outstanding warrants to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings were equitably adjusted pursuant to their terms so that they are exercisable for Holdco Units (and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock). Refer to Note 1 for a discussion of the Reorganization Transactions.
Distributions
On a quarterly basis, we payThe following table summarizes activity associated with our non-tax distributions and payments, as well as our tax distributions typically in January, April, June and September each year, based on the estimated tax payments that our members are expected to have to make during any given period (based upon various tax rate assumptions). During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, we paid tax distributions of $63.7 million, $71.3 million and $46.9 million, respectively.
In certain circumstances, we also paid special distributions. See Note 7 for a discussion of distributions made during 2018 and 2017 using the net proceeds from our original and modified term loans, respectively.
In May 2018, we declared a special operating distribution of $26.2 million, of which $25.1 million was paid in cash during the year ended December 31, 2018. The remaining portion of the declared distribution will be paid in stages upon vesting events and is recorded within related party liabilities ($0.2 million) and other liabilities ($0.9 million) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets asperiods indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, | | Remaining Reserved Payment(1) |
| (in thousands) | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 | |
| Non-tax distributions previously declared and paid upon vesting | | | | | | | |
Credit Agreement Distributions(2) | | | | | | | |
| Distributions | $ | 1,059 | | | $ | 1,927 | | | $ | 2,787 | | | $ | 1,005 | |
| Related party payments | — | | | — | | | 570 | | | — | |
| Special Operating Distributions | | | | | | | |
| Distributions | 507 | | | 914 | | | 1,304 | | | 565 | |
| Related party payments | — | | | — | | | 258 | | | — | |
| Tax distributions | 15,180 | | | 48,200 | | | 18,549 | | | N/A |
| Total | $ | 16,746 | | | $ | 51,041 | | | $ | 23,468 | | | $ | 1,570 | |
(1)As of December 31, 2018. See Note 14 for further discussion of related party transactions.
In December 2017, we declared a $160.0 million special cash distribution to GS Holdings unit holders and holders of profits interests. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we made distributions of $1.4 million. The2021, all remaining unpaid portionportions of the declared distribution of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2018 isnon-tax distributions were recorded within other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 1 for discussion of the Reorganization Transactions.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we did not declare or pay any special distributions.
(2)See Note 7 for discussion of distributions using the proceeds from our borrowings and see Note 14 for discussion of unpaid distributions owed to related parties.borrowings.
Note 11.12. Share-Based Compensation
We maintain the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2018 Plan"), which was adopted in April 2018. The Company reserved a total of 24.024 million shares of Class A common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2018 Plan. As of December 31, 2018, 22.82021, 14.5 million shares of the Company's common stock remained available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan. The Company has the following types of share-based compensation awards outstanding as of December 31, 2018:2021: Class A common stock options, unvested Holdco Units and unvested Class A common stock awards.
Historical information prior to the Reorganization Transactions has been restated below to account for a 10 to 1 stock split that occurred immediately prior to the IPO in connection with the Reorganization Transactions.
We recorded share-based compensation expenseGreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The following table summarizes share-based compensation expense we recorded within compensation and benefits expense and cost of revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Included within | | | | | | |
| Compensation and benefits | | $ | 14,133 | | | $ | 13,573 | | | $ | 12,882 | |
| Cost of revenue | | 1,527 | | | 1,334 | | | 872 | |
Class A Common Stock Options
Class A common stock options ("Options") granted by the Company are time-vested awards that vest ratably over a period of threefour to five years of continued employee or non-employee service, or cliff vest at the end of a period of five years of continued employee service. The contractual term of Options is ten years from the grant date. Options are not subject to post-vesting restrictions. Upon the exercise of Options, the Company issues Class A common stock.
On October 1, 2015, and as discussed in more detail under "Profits Interests," certain GS Holdings Class A unit options were capped ("Capped Options") and an equivalent number of profits interests were issued with a threshold value of $7.60 per unit, which represented the fair value of the GS Holdings Class A units as of that date. Capped Options and their related profits interest awards were aggregated to count as one unit against the legacy GS Holdings equity incentive plan authorization limit. See "Profits Interests" below for discussion of the effects of this modification.
As part of the Reorganization Transactions, outstanding options to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings (including Capped Options) were equitably adjusted so that they are exercisable fornew shares of Class A common stock, which remain subject to the same vesting requirements of the original GS Holdings Class A unit options ("Class A Unit Options"). We evaluated this modification in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock compensation and determined that it does not require modification accounting. One hundred forty-five employees and former employees and four non-employees were affected by this modification. Refer to Note 1 for a discussion of the Reorganization Transactions.stock.
Option activity was as follows during the periods indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
Number of
Options | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | | Number of
Options | | Number of
Options |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 3,862,926 | | | $ | 9.70 | | | 4,181,909 | | | 8,053,292 | |
Granted(1) | — | | | — | | | 1,134,644 | | | 1,610,407 | |
Exercised(2)(3) | (375,903) | | | 5.82 | | | (539,880) | | | (5,192,471) | |
| Forfeited | (497,198) | | | 9.24 | | | (725,043) | | | (258,819) | |
Expired(4) | (386,787) | | | 10.30 | | | (188,704) | | | (30,500) | |
Outstanding at end of period(5) | 2,603,038 | | | $ | 10.01 | | | 3,862,926 | | | 4,181,909 | |
Exercisable at end of period(5)(6) | 1,306,879 | | | $ | 10.98 | | | 1,362,613 | | | 1,262,998 | |
(1)No options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2021. Weighted average grant date fair value of Options granted during the years indicated:ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $1.73 and $3.38, respectively.
(2)The total intrinsic value of Options exercised, which is defined as the amount by which the market value of the stock on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price, during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $0.8 million, $1.4 million and $27.7 million, respectively.
(3)Employees paid $917 thousand to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2021 to exercise Options, which resulted in the issuance of 165,227 shares of Class A common stock. In addition, during this period, Options exercisable for 124,500 shares of Class A common stock were exercised by means of a cashless net exercise procedure, which resulted in the issuance of 15,907 shares of Class A common stock and for which the Company paid withholding taxes of $51 thousand. Options exercisable for 86,176 shares of Class A common stock were exercised by means of a cashless net exercise procedure by non-employee directors, which resulted in the issuance of 21,750 shares of Class A common stock.
Non-employee directors paid $470 thousand to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2020 to exercise Options, which resulted in the issuance of 434,880 shares of Class A common stock. In addition, during this period, Options exercisable for 105,000 shares of Class A common stock were exercised by means of a cashless net exercise procedure, which resulted in the issuance of 15,051 shares of Class A common stock and for which the Company paid withholding taxes of $73 thousand. No amounts were paid by employees to the Company to exercise Options for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Employees paid $307 thousand to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2019 to exercise Options, which resulted in the issuance of 37,497 shares of Class A common stock. In addition, during this period, Options exercisable for 5,154,964 shares of Class A common stock were exercised by means of a cashless net exercise procedure, which resulted in the issuance of 2,236,095 shares of Class A common stock and for which the Company paid withholding taxes of $12.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.
(4)Expired Options represent vested, underwater Options that were not exercised by terminated employees as stipulated in the Option award agreements, generally within 30 days from the employment termination date.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Number of Options | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Number of Options | | Number of Options |
| | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 9,821,890 |
| | $ | 2.65 |
| | 10,006,890 |
| | 10,490,980 |
|
Granted prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO(1) | 340,000 |
| | 14.95 |
| | 500,000 |
| | 420,000 |
|
Exercised prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO(2)(3) | (270,000 | ) | | 3.19 |
| | (202,000 | ) | | (50,000 | ) |
| Forfeited prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO | (260,000 | ) | | 6.41 |
| | (483,000 | ) | | (854,090 | ) |
| Effect of Reorganization Transactions and IPO | (186,772 | ) | | 7.56 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Granted after the Reorganization Transactions and IPO(1) | 1,114,029 |
| | 20.64 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Exercised after Reorganization Transactions and IPO(2)(3) | (2,171,284 | ) | | 1.09 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
| Forfeited after Reorganization Transactions and IPO | (321,506 | ) | | 16.98 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Expired after Reorganization Transactions and IPO(4) | (13,065 | ) | | 10.68 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Outstanding at end of period(5) | 8,053,292 |
| | $ | 5.25 |
| | 9,821,890 |
| | 10,006,890 |
|
Exercisable at end of period(5)(6) | 5,364,233 |
| | $ | 1.89 |
| | 7,015,000 |
| | 4,672,400 |
|
| |
(1)
| Weighted average grant date fair value of Options granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $6.06, $3.52 and $4.05, respectively.
|
| |
(2)
| The total intrinsic value of Options exercised, which is defined as the amount by which the market value of the stock on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price, during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $15,374, $396 and $98, respectively. |
| |
(3)
| Employees paid $398 during the year ended December 31, 2018 to the Company to exercise Options, which resulted in the issuance of 30,516 Holdco Units prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO and 8,347 shares of Class A common stock subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2018, 2,372,936 Options were exercised by means of a cashless net exercise procedure, which resulted in the issuance of 38,637 Holdco Units prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO and the issuance of 1,027,377 shares of Class A common stock subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. The income tax benefit from Options exercised during 2018 was $867.
|
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
(5)The aggregate intrinsic value and weighted average remaining contractual terms of Options outstanding and Options exercisable were as follows as of the date indicated: | | | | | | | | |
(4)
| Expired Options represent vested underwater Options that were not exercised by terminated employees within 30 days from the employment termination date, as stipulated in the Option award agreements. | December 31, 2021 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) | | |
(5)
Options outstanding | The aggregate intrinsic value and weighted | $ | 7.4 | |
| Options exercisable | | $ | 2.7 | |
Weighted average remaining contractual terms of Options outstanding, all of which were assumed to vest, and Options exercisable were as follows:term (in years) |
|
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2018 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value (in millions) | | |
| Options outstanding | | $ | 35.0 |
|
| Options exercisable | | $ | 31.1 |
|
| Weighted average remaining term (in years) | | |
| Options outstanding | | 5.5 |
|
| Options exercisable | | 4.3 |
|
| |
(6)
Options outstanding | The total fair value, based on grant date fair value, of | 7.0 |
Options that vested was $1,246, $1,446 and $1,234 during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.exercisable | | 6.4 |
(6)The total fair value, based on grant date fair value, of Options that vested during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 was $2.3 million, $2.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
Compensation expense related to Options is measured based on their grant date fair values. We use a Black-Scholes options pricing model to determine the grant date fair value of Options.
The following inputs and assumptions were used to value the Options as of the grant dates:dates for the years indicated. There were no Options granted in 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | | | 0.46 – 0.48% | | 1.50 – 2.50% |
Expected volatility(1) | | | | 48.28 – 48.50% | | 22.45 – 24.40% |
Expected dividend yield(2) | | | | —% | | —% |
Expected term (in months)(3) | | | | 75 | | 75 |
| Fair value of Options | | | | $1.72 – $1.90 | | $1.77 – $3.78 |
(1)Beginning in 2020, we estimated volatility based on historical volatility rates of GreenSky and a peer group of public payment processing companies over a period that approximates the expected term. Prior to 2020, we estimated volatility based on historical volatility rates of a peer group of public companies over a period that approximates the expected term. |
| | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 2.77 – 3.06% | | 2.03 – 2.23% | | 1.33 – 2.29% |
Expected volatility(1) | | 23.10 – 25.70% | | 23.90 – 44.40% | | 40.90 – 44.40% |
Expected dividend yield(2) | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 |
Expected term (in months)(3) | | 75 – 78 | | 78 | | 78 |
| Fair value of Options | | $2.95 – $7.14 | | $2.69 – $4.99 | | $3.22 – $5.00 |
| |
(1)(3)We determined the expected term as the midpoint between the scheduled vesting and expiration dates of the awards. We used the simplified method primarily due to having insufficient historical Option exercise experience upon which to reasonably estimate an expected term. | We estimated volatility based on historical volatility rates of a peer group of public payment processing companies over a period that approximates the expected term. |
| |
(2)
| We assumed a dividend yield of zero as we have no plans to declare dividends for the foreseeable future. |
| |
(3)
| We determined the expected term as the midpoint between the scheduled vesting and expiration dates of the awards. We used the simplified method primarily due to having insufficient historical Option exercise experience upon which to reasonably estimate an expected term. |
At December 31, 2018,2021, unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested Options totaled $8.9$2.6 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.91.7 years.
On October 1, 2015, we began to award profits interests to certain employees and non-employee directors. Profits interests were assigned a threshold value on the dateGreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
As part of the Reorganization Transactions, profits interests were replaced with Holdco Units, which remain subject to the same vesting requirements as the original profits interests. Sixty-five employees and former employees and three non-employees were affected by the modification. Refer to Note 1 for a detailed discussion of the Reorganization Transactions.
Profits interests activity was as follows during the years indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Number of
Profits
Interests | | Weighted
Average
Threshold Price | | Number of
Profits
Interests | | Number of
Profits
Interests |
| Outstanding at beginning of period | 14,061,530 |
| | $ | 8.23 |
| | 12,616,890 |
| | 11,375,980 |
|
Granted prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO(1) | 2,920,000 |
| | 14.31 |
| | 2,374,640 |
| | 2,045,000 |
|
| Forfeited prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO | (800,000 | ) | | 9.32 |
| | (930,000 | ) | | (750,090 | ) |
| Redeemed prior to Reorganization Transactions and IPO | — |
| | N/A |
| | — |
| | (54,000 | ) |
| Effect of Reorganization Transactions and IPO | (16,181,530 | ) | | 9.27 |
| | N/A |
| | N/A |
|
Outstanding at end of period(2) | — |
| | N/A |
| | 14,061,530 |
| | 12,616,890 |
|
| |
(1)
| Weighted average grant date fair value of profits interests granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $4.47, $3.49 and $3.19, respectively.
|
| |
(2)
| The total fair value based on grant date fair value of profits interests that vested was $371, $2,385 and $751 during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
|
Compensation expense related to profits interests was measured based on the grant date fair value of the profits interests. We used a Black-Scholes options pricing model to determine the grant date fair value of profits interests.
The following inputs and assumptions were used to value the profits interests (limited to profits interests without an associated Capped Option) as of the grant dates.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Risk-free interest rate | | 2.60 – 2.63% | | 1.80 – 2.18% | | 1.07 – 1.60% |
Expected volatility(1) | | 25.70% | | 23.90 – 24.80% | | 40.90 – 44.40% |
Expected dividend yield(2) | | —% | | —% | | —% |
Expected term (in months)(3) | | 54 – 60 | | 60 | | 60 |
| Fair value of profits interests | | $3.92 – $5.91 | | $2.28 – $4.01 | | $2.81 – $4.30 |
| |
(1)
| We estimated volatility based on historical volatility rates of a peer group of public payment processing companies over a period that approximates the expected term. |
| |
(2)
| We assumed a dividend yield of zero as we have no plans to declare dividends for the foreseeable future. |
| |
(3)
| We determined the expected term to be equivalent to the vesting period. |
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Unvested Holdco Units
As part of the Reorganization Transactions and the IPO, 15,241,530certain profits interests in GS Holdings were converted into 2,941,139 and 3,172,843to vested and unvested Holdco Units respectively, based on the prevailing profits interests thresholds and the IPO price of $23.00 per share.price. The converted Holdco Units remain subject to the same service vesting requirements as the original profits interests, andwhich vest ratably over a period of five years of continued employee service. Unvested Holdco Units are not subject to post-vesting restrictions. We evaluated this modification in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock compensation, and determined that there was no incremental share-based compensation expense to recognize as a result of this modification. Therefore, unrecognized compensation expense was unaffected by the modification. Thirty-six employees and former employees and three non-employees were affected by this modification.
Unvested Holdco Units activity was as follows during the
yearyears indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Number of Holdco Units | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Number of Holdco Units | | Number of Holdco Units |
| Unvested at beginning of period | 489,486 | | | $ | 23.00 | | | 1,112,607 | | | 2,514,856 | |
| Forfeited | — | | | N/A | | (47,783) | | | (301,735) | |
Vested(1) | (259,246) | | | 23.00 | | | (575,338) | | | (1,100,514) | |
| Unvested at end of period | 230,240 | | | $ | 23.00 | | | 489,486 | | | 1,112,607 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| Number of Holdco Units | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
| Unvested at beginning of period | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Effect of Reorganization Transactions and IPO | 3,172,843 |
| | $ | 23.00 |
|
| Granted | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Forfeited | (156,739 | ) | | 23.00 |
|
Vested(1) | (501,248 | ) | | 23.00 |
|
| Unvested at end of period | 2,514,856 |
| | $ | 23.00 |
|
| |
(1)
| (1)The total fair value, based on grant date fair value, of previously unvested Holdco Units that vested during the year ended December 31, 2018 was $11,529. |
During the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, 277,0592021, 2020 and 2019 was $6.0 million, $13.2 million and $25.3 million, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019,618,697 and 185,227 and 655,334, respectively, vested Holdco Units were exchanged (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one1-for-one basis. At December 31, 2018, 3,165,3282021, 3,335,676 vested Holdco Units were eligible for exchange for shares of our Class A common stock.
At December 31, 2018,2021, unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested Holdco Unit awards totaled $13.4$1.5 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.61.1 years.
Restricted Stock Awards
As part of the Reorganization Transactions and the IPO, 940,000certain outstanding profits interests in GS Holdings were converted into 127,327 and 255,904 vested and unvested respectively, Class A common stock awards based on the prevailing profits interests thresholdthresholds and the IPO price of $23.00 per share.price. The converted unvested Class A common stock awards areremain subject to the same service vesting requirements as the original profits interest awardsinterests and are not subject to post-vesting restrictions. We evaluated this modification in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock compensation, and determined that there was no incremental share-based compensation expense to recognize as a result of this modification. Therefore, unrecognized compensation expense was unaffected by the modification. Twenty-nine employees and former employees were affected by this modification.
Subsequent to the Reorganization Transactions and the IPO, we granted restricted stock awards in the form of unvested Class A common stock to certain employees that vest ratably over a four-year periodthree or four years based on continued employment at the Company.Company and to certain non-employee directors that vest one year from grant date based on continued service on the Board of Directors ("Board"). For these awards, compensation expense is measured based on the closing stock price of the Company's Class A common stock on the date of grant, and the total value of the awards is expensed ratably over the requisite service period.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Unvested Class A common stock award activity was as follows during the years indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
December 31, 2021 | | Year Ended
December 31, 2020 | | Year Ended December 31, 2019 |
| Class A common stock | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Class A common stock | | Class A common stock |
| Unvested at beginning of period | 4,956,922 | | | $ | 6.53 | | | 2,999,343 | | | 454,561 | |
Granted(1) | 2,263,300 | | | 6.74 | | | 3,473,245 | | | 2,887,905 | |
Forfeited(2) | (691,370) | | | 6.48 | | | (697,383) | | | (210,845) | |
Vested(3) | (1,647,530) | | | 6.71 | | | (818,283) | | | (132,278) | |
| Unvested at end of period | 4,881,322 | | | $ | 6.57 | | | 4,956,922 | | | 2,999,343 | |
(1)Weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021, 2020 and 2019 was $6.74, $3.96 and $10.90, respectively.
(2)Forfeited shares of unvested Class A common stock associated with restricted stock awards are held in our treasury stock account. Refer to Note 11 for additional information on our treasury stock. |
| | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| Class A common stock | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
| Unvested at beginning of period | — |
| | N/A |
|
| Effect of Reorganization Transactions and IPO | 255,904 |
| | $ | 23.00 |
|
| Granted | 234,829 |
| | 15.37 |
|
Forfeited(1) | (11,750 | ) | | 22.17 |
|
Vested(2) | (24,422 | ) | | 23.00 |
|
| Unvested at end of period | 454,561 |
| | $ | 19.08 |
|
| |
(1)
| Forfeited shares of unvested Class A common stock associated with restricted stock awards are held in our treasury stock account. Refer to Note 10 for additional information on our treasury stock.
|
| |
(2)
| The total fair value, based on grant date fair value, of previously unvested Class A common stock awards that vested during the year(3)The total fair value, based on grant date fair value, of previously unvested Class A common stock that vested during the years ended December 31, 2018 was $562. |
At December 31, 2018,2021, 2020 and 2019 was $11.1 million, $9.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2021, unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested Class A common stock totaled $4.6$23.7 million, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining requisite service period of 3.82.6 years.
Note 12.13. Income Taxes
GreenSky, Inc. is taxed as a corporation and pays corporate federal, state and local taxes on income allocated to it from GS Holdings based upon GreenSky, Inc.’s economic interest held in GS Holdings. GS Holdings is treated as a pass-through partnership for income tax reporting purposes which isand not subject to federal income tax. Accordingly, the Company is not liable for income taxes on the portion of GS Holdings' earnings not allocated to which it is not allocated. The results for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 do not reflect income tax expense because, prior to the Reorganization Transactions, the consolidated GSLLC (and subsequently GS Holdings) pass-through entity was not subject to corporate tax.it.
The Company's income before income tax expense of $133,514, $138,668$131.7 million, $30.3 million and $124,464$88.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016,2019, respectively, consisted entirely of income earned in the United States.
Components of income tax expense consisted of the following for the yearyears indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Current income tax expense (benefit): | | | | | | |
| Federal | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 3 | | | $ | 5 | |
| State | | 7 | | | 9 | | | 10 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (benefit): | | | | | | |
| Federal | | 12,030 | | | 2,963 | | | 4,206 | |
| State | | 1,838 | | | (1,378) | | | (11,346) | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | $ | 13,880 | | | $ | 1,597 | | | $ | (7,125) | |
|
| | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31, 2018 |
| Current income taxes: | | |
| Federal | | $ | 4 |
|
| State | | 5 |
|
| Deferred income taxes: | | |
| Federal | | 4,860 |
|
| State | | 665 |
|
| Total income tax expense | | $ | 5,534 |
|
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
A reconciliation of the United States statutory income tax rate to the Company's effective income tax rate is as follows for the years indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Statutory federal tax rate | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
| Income attributable to noncontrolling interests and nontaxable income | | (12.1) | | | (13.0) | | | (15.2) | |
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | 1.4 | | | 1.1 | | | 0.6 | |
| State rate change impact on deferred taxes | | — | | | (5.7) | | | (13.0) | |
| Remeasurement of liability under tax receivable agreement | | — | | | 1.1 | | | 2.3 | |
| Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation | | — | | | 0.9 | | | (3.3) | |
| Other | | 0.2 | | | (0.1) | | | (0.4) | |
| Effective income tax rate | | 10.5 | % | | 5.3 | % | | (8.0) | % |
The Company’s effective tax rate was 10.5% in 2021, in comparison to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21.0%. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 includes an adjustment for the portion of GS Holdings’ earnings that are attributable to the non-controlling interests, as well as immaterial tax effects of other items required to be recorded discretely in the interim periods in which they occur. The effective tax rate is dependent on many factors, including the estimated amount of income subject to income tax; therefore, the effective tax rate can vary from period to period. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Statutory federal tax rate | | 21.0 | % | | 35.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| Income attributable to noncontrolling interest and nontaxable income | | (16.3 | ) | | (35.0 | ) | | (35.0 | ) |
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other | | (1.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Effective income tax rate | | 4.1 | % | | — | % | | — | % |
As of December 31, 2021, we concluded based on the weight of all available positive and negative evidence that all of our deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. As such, no additional valuation allowance was recognized.
Details of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:follows as of the dates indicated: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Deferred tax assets: | | | | |
| Investment in partnership | | $ | 454,133 | | | $ | 366,889 | |
| Net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits | | 33,038 | | | 19,622 | |
| Other | | 1,216 | | | 1,440 | |
| Total | | 488,387 | | | 387,951 | |
| Valuation allowance | | — | | | — | |
| Total deferred tax assets | | 488,387 | | | 387,951 | |
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | — | | | — | |
| Deferred tax assets, net | | $ | 488,387 | | | $ | 387,951 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2018 |
| Deferred tax assets: | | |
Investment in partnership(1) | | $ | 299,466 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits | | 5,634 |
|
| Other | | 1,879 |
|
| Total | | 306,979 |
|
| Valuation allowance | | — |
|
| Total deferred tax assets | | 306,979 |
|
| Total deferred tax liabilities | | — |
|
| Deferred tax assets, net | | $ | 306,979 |
|
| |
(1)
| Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These temporary differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, the IPO, and subsequent exchanges of Class B common stock for Class A common stock, the Company recognized a deferred tax asset in the amount of $299.5 million. This balance is primarily related to $296.0 million from Holdco Unit exchanges, which is net of $10.9 million of current period amortization. The remaining balance is associated with basis difference in our investment in GS Holdings that does not give rise to TRA payments. |
As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had federal and state (net of federal benefit) net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) of $5.6$31.6 million, of which approximately $4.8$27.9 million have an indefinite life. NOLs of $0.8$3.7 million will begin to expire in 2030. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had federal and state tax credit carryforwards, inclusive of uncertain tax positions, of $677 thousand and $762 thousand, respectively, which will begin to expire in 2028 and 2038, respectively. The Company believes as of December 31, 2018,2021, it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize the NOLs and tax credits and, as such, no valuation allowance was recorded.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amountamounts of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the year indicated:years indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 98 | | | $ | 54 | |
| Increase related to current year tax positions | | 39 | | | 44 | |
| Decrease related to current year tax positions | | — | | | — | |
| Ending balance | | $ | 137 | | | $ | 98 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31, 2018 |
| Beginning balance | | $ | — |
|
| Increase related to Reorganization Transactions | | 1,085 |
|
| Increase related to current year tax positions | | 2,292 |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 3,377 |
|
As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the total liability related to uncertain tax positions was $137 thousand and $98 thousand, respectively. If recognized, $137 thousand of the amount of unrecognized tax benefits would impact our effective tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if applicable, related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties were immaterial as of December 31, 2018. None of the unrecognized tax benefits detailed above2021 and 2020, and therefore did not impact the effective income tax rate. As of December 31, 2018, the Company anticipates that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits could decrease by up to $3.4 million within the next twelve months due to the Company filing a non-automatic method change with the Internal Revenue Service.
The Company files income tax returns as required by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Company may be subject to examination by federal and certain state and local
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
tax authorities. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company’s federal income tax returns for the years 20152018 through 20172020 and state and local tax returns for the years 20142017 through 20172020 remain open and are subject to examination. Currently, no tax authorities are auditing any of the Company’s income tax matters.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Pursuant to our election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), we expect to obtain an increase in our share of the tax basis in the net assets of GS Holdings when Holdco Units are redeemed or exchanged by the Continuing LLC Members.Members of GS Holdings. We intend to treat any redemptions and exchanges of Holdco Units as direct purchases of Holdco Units for United States federal income tax purposes. These increases in tax basis may reduce the amounts that we would otherwise pay in the future to various tax authorities. They may also decrease gains (or increase losses) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent tax basis is allocated to those capital assets.
On May 23, 2018, we entered into a TRAtax receivable agreement ("TRA") that provides for the payment by us of 85% of the amount of any tax benefits that we actually realize, or in some cases are deemed to realize, as a result of:of (i) increases in our share of the tax basis in the net assets of GS Holdings resulting from any redemptions or exchanges of Holdco Units and from our acquisition of the equity of certain of the Former Corporate Investors, (ii) tax basis increases attributable to payments made under the TRA, and (iii) deductions attributable to imputed interest pursuant to the TRA (the "TRA Payments"). We expectDuring 2021 the TRA was amended to provide that, upon the consummation of a qualifying change in control, no early termination payment or tax benefit frompayment would be required to be made. During the remaining 15%years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we made payments, inclusive of any tax benefits that we may actually realize. The TRA Payments are not conditioned upon any continued ownership interest, in GS Holdings or us. The rights of each member$4.1 million and $12.8 million, respectively, to members of GS Holdings that ispursuant to the TRA. Pending the closing of the merger, no additional payments will be made pursuant to the TRA.
As a result of the Reorganization Transactions, the IPO and subsequent exchanges of Class B common stock for Class A common stock, during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized deferred tax assets in the amount of $113.8 million and $11.9 million, respectively, and corresponding tax receivable agreement liabilities of $96.8 million and $10.1 million, respectively, representing approximately 85% of the tax benefits due to beneficiaries of the TRA. The offset to the initial entries recorded in connection with exchanges in each year was to additional paid-in capital in the Consolidated Statements of Equity (Deficit). During the year ended December 31, 2021, there was no change in deferred tax assets due to state tax law changes, and there was no filing in certain states for the first time, thus no corresponding change in tax benefit. During the year ended December 31, 2020, there was a $1.6 million increase in deferred tax assets due to various state tax law changes and filing in certain states for the first time, with a corresponding $1.6 million tax benefit. Because there were no state tax rate changes in 2021, there was not a corresponding impact to the TRA liability or adjustment to other gains (losses). In the year
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
ended 2020, the TRA liability increased $1.4 million, with a corresponding adjustment to other gains (losses), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
As a condition to the Merger Agreement, the Company and certain beneficiaries party to the TRA are assignablewere required to transferees of their respective Holdco Units. The timing and amount of aggregateenter into an amendment to the TRA (the “TRA Amendment”), which TRA Amendment provided that no payments due under the TRA may vary based onwill be made following or as a numberresult of factors, including the timing and amountconsummation of taxable income generated by the Company each year, as well as the tax rate then applicable.Mergers.
In 2018, GreenSky recorded an initial $306.9 million deferred tax asset related to exchanges, which is amortizable over 15 years and is eligible for future TRA payments. As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, the Company had a liability of $260.9$403.1 million and $310.4 million, respectively, related to the undiscountedits projected obligations under the TRA, which is captioned as tax receivable agreement liability in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we did not make any payments, inclusive of interest, to members of GS Holdings pursuant to the TRA. Within the next twelve months, we expect such payments to total $4.9 million.
Note 13.14. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
Commitments
Leases
In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, we determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception of the contract. A contract is or contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. We primarily lease our premises under multi-year, non-cancelable operating leases. Operating leases withare included in other assets and other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we did not have any finance leases.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU assets are increased by any prepaid lease payments and are reduced by any unamortized lease incentives. While our lease terms expiring through 2024, exclusive of renewal option periods. Our lease agreement expiring in 2024 also contains a renewal option, at our election,may include options to extend or terminate the lease for five consecutive three-year periods.leases, it is not reasonably certain that we will exercise such options. Base rent is typically subject to rent escalations on each annual anniversary from the lease commencement dates. RentalLease expense for lease payments, as well asincluding any step rent provisions specified in the lease agreements, are aggregated and charged evenly to expense over the lease term. Certain of these operating leases contain rent holidays and tenant allowances that may be applied toward leasehold improvements or other lease concessions. Capital improvement funding and other lease concessions provided by the landlord are recorded as deferred liabilities and are amortized evenly over the lease term as a reduction of rent expense. In most circumstances, we expect that in the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases.
Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease term and is included within property, office and technology and related party expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Operating lease cost associated with our ROU assets and lease liabilities was $4.9 million, $4.2 million, and $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. See Note 1415 for additional information regarding office space leased from a related party. Rent expense was $3,183, $2,972 and $2,464
On June 23, 2021 GreenSky exercised an early termination option for the years endedone of its leases effective December 31, 2018, 20172021. Accordingly, GreenSky remained in the leased space through December 31, 2021 and 2016, respectively.has paid a termination penalty of $1.2 million. The remeasurement of the lease liability resulted in a reduction of $1.0 million and a corresponding adjustment to the right of use asset.
On June 30, 2021 GreenSky amended the lease term for one of its leases through November 30, 2029 and extended a portion of one of its leases through November 30, 2027. The remeasurement of the lease liability resulted in the increase of the combined, underlying right of use asset by $8.9 million and the lease liability by $10.9 million, net of an estimated lease incentive receivable of $2.0 million.
Our operating leases have terms expiring from 2021 through 2029, exclusive of renewal option periods. Our leases contain renewal option periods of five years from the expiration dates. In our normal course of business, we expect our leases to be renewed, amended or replaced by other leases.
As of December 31, 2021, we did not have any operating leases that had not yet commenced.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
As of the date indicated, future minimum lease payments underSupplemental cash flow and noncash information related to our operating leases were as follows for the years presented wereindicated. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities | | | |
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 4,159 | | | $ | 4,765 | |
| Noncash operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities | | | |
| Resulting from new or modified leases | 7,888 | | | 9 | |
Supplemental balance sheet information related to our operating leases was as follows:follows as of the dates indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| 2021 | | 2020 |
| Operating lease ROU assets | $ | 11,792 | | | $ | 8,265 | |
| Operating lease liabilities | 13,409 | | | 10,107 | |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | 6.4 | | 2.4 |
| Weighted average discount rate | 5.6 | % | | 5.8 | % |
|
| | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| 2019 | $ | 3,871 |
|
| 2020 | 4,073 |
|
| 2021 | 4,173 |
|
| 2022 | 3,087 |
|
| 2023 | 1,238 |
|
| Thereafter | 542 |
|
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | 16,984 |
|
| | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 |
| 2022 | $ | 3,813 | |
| 2023 | 2,661 | |
| 2024 | 2,009 | |
| 2025 | 2,065 | |
| 2026 | 2,123 | |
| Thereafter | 5,883 | |
| Total lease payments | $ | 18,554 | |
| Less: imputed interest | (5,145) | |
| Operating lease liabilities | $ | 13,409 | |
Covenants
Our transaction processor and some Bank Partners impose financial covenants upon our wholly owned subsidiary, GSLLC. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, GSLLC was in compliance with allthe financial covenants.covenant provisions in these agreements. In addition, the agreements entered into as part of our loan participation sales with institutional investors and financial institutions impose financial covenants upon the Company. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenant provisions in these agreements. See Note 7 for discussion of financial and non-financial covenants associated with our borrowings.
Other Commitments
As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the outstanding open and unused line of credit on approved loan receivables held for sale was $3.0$2.7 million and $9.9$99.9 million, respectively, for which werespectively. We did not record a provision in the Consolidated Financial Statements.for these unfunded commitments, but we believe we have adequate cash on hand to fund these commitments.
Beginning in 2018, forFor certain Bank Partners, we maintain a restricted cash balance based on a contractual percentage of the total interest billed on outstanding deferred interest loans that are within thetheir respective promotional periodperiods less previous FCR on such outstanding loans. As of December 31, 2018,2021 and 2020, restricted cash in the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes $49.8$53.3 million and $84.6 million, respectively, associated with these arrangements.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Contingencies
In limited instances, the Company may be subject to operating losses if we make certain errors in managing credit programs and we determine that a customer is not liable for a loan originated by a Bank Partner. We evaluated this contingency in accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies, and determined that it is reasonably possible that losses could result from errors in underwriting. However, in management’s opinion, it is not possible to estimate the likelihood or range of reasonably possible future losses related to errors in underwriting based on currently available information. Therefore, we have not established a liability for this loss contingency.
Further, from time to time, we place Bank Partner loans on non-accrual and non-payment status (“Pended Status”) while we investigate consumer loan balance inquiries, which may arise from disputed charges related to work performed by third-party merchants. As of December 31, 2018,2021, Bank Partner loan balances in Pended Status were $17.3$11.7 million. While it is management’s expectation that mostthe majority of these loan balance inquiries will be resolved without incident, in certain instances we may determine that it is appropriate for the Company to permanently reverse the loan balance, and assume the economic responsibility for the loan balance itself. Weand record a liability for these instances. As of December 31, 2018,2021, our liability for potential Pended Status future losses was $4.5$1.6 million.
Legal Proceedings
FromIn addition, from time to time, we may become a party to civil claimsenter into indemnification agreements with business partners and lawsuitsother third parties in the ordinary course of business.business in connection with which we typically agree to indemnify and defend the indemnified parties against certain claims and related losses that they may suffer or incur as a result of our activities. The duration of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual, and our maximum exposure with respect to such arrangements is not reasonably determinable. Historically, we have not incurred material costs related to these indemnity obligations, and we maintain insurance to offset certain of these potential costs. We also have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and with certain of our officers, which require us to indemnify such individuals, to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, against certain liabilities to which they may become subject by reason of their service to us and to advance certain expenses on their behalf.
Legal Proceedings
IPO Litigation
On November 12, 2018, theLitigation. The Company, andtogether with certain of its officers and directors and one of its former directors and certain underwriters of the Company’s IPO were named in a putative class action filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York captioned Langere v. GreenSky, Inc., et al., Index No. 655626/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). The Langere complaint asserts on behalf of purchasers in the Company’s IPO claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) based on alleged misstatements in the registration statement filed in connection with the IPO and seeks unspecified damages. Certain underwriters of the IPO are also named as defendants. Since the filing of Langere, at least four additional putative class actions have been filed in the same court (collectively, the “State Cases”), asserting substantially similar allegations and claims under the 1933 Act against a common set of defendants: Dobek v. GreenSky, Inc., et al., Index No. 655707/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.); Zou v. GreenSky, Inc., et al., Index No. 655744/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.); Coombs v. GreenSky, Inc., et
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
al., Index No. 656134/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.); and Zhang et al. v. GreenSky, Inc., et al., Index No. 656164/2018 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.). Two of these actions, Dobek and Zou, also set forth additional claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the 1933 Act based on alleged misstatements in the prospectus filed in connection with the IPO.
The Company and its officers and directors intend to defend themselves vigorously in all respects in regard to the State Cases, which are in the process of being consolidated. Under certain circumstances, the Company may be obligated to indemnify some or all of the other defendants in the State Cases. At this time, due to the uncertain nature of litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate its costs or any potential liability related to the State Cases.
On November 27, 2018, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named in a putative class action filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Mustafin v.(the "District Court") (In Re: GreenSky, Inc. Securities Litigation (Consolidated Action), et al.,Case No. 1:18-cv-110712018-cv-11071-AKH (S.D.N.Y.)). The Mustafin complaint asserts on behalf of purchasers
In April 2021, the parties in the IPO claimscase entered into a binding Memorandum of Understanding to settle the matter and the proposed settlement was preliminarily approved by the District Court in June 2021. All amounts payable by the Company under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15the settlement have been paid by the Company’s insurers as of the 1933 Act based on alleged misstatementsDecember 31, 2021.
Regulatory matter. We have, from time to time in the normal course of our business, received or are subject to, inquiries or investigations by regulators regarding the GreenSky program, including the origination and servicing of consumer loans, practices by merchants or other third parties, and licensing and registration statementrequirements.
In July 2021, the Company entered into a consent order with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to resolve its inquiry related to consumer complaints about certain allegedly unauthorized loans initiated by certain merchants. Without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, GreenSky paid a civil money penalty of $2.5 million and prospectus filedagreed to provide redress to eligible consumers where there is insufficient evidence of customer authorization that will be capped at $3 million in cash redress (with a minimum remittance of $750,000) and capped at $6 million in credit redress via loan cancellations.
Other matters. In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are involved, from time to time, in (i) various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other proceedings, and (ii) inquiries and investigations (both formal and informal) by governmental agencies involving, among other matters, the origination and servicing of consumer loans, licensing and merchant activity, certain of which actions, inquiries and investigations may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties and injunctive relief.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
We recognize all legal fees as they are incurred with respect to all such matters as a sales, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. Where available information indicates that it is probable a liability has been incurred in connection with the IPOany pending matter and seeks unspecified damages. Certain underwriters of the IPO are also named as defendants.
On January 4, 2019, an additional putative class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned Yu v. GreenSky, Inc., et al., No. 1:19-cv-00100 (S.D.N.Y.), asserting substantially similar allegations and claims under the 1933 Act against a common set of defendants (together with Mustafin, the “Federal Cases”).
The Company and its officers and directors intend to defend themselves vigorously in all respect in regard to the Federal Cases. Under certain circumstances, the Company may be obligated to indemnify some or all of the other defendants in the Federal Cases. At this time, due to the uncertain nature of litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate its costs or any potential liability related to the Federal Cases.
As the Company is unable to determine the probability of the outcomes of these actions, and cannotwe can reasonably estimate the amount of potentialsuch liability, we also accrue the estimated liability by a charge to income.
In many matters, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable (or even possible) or to estimate the amount of any such loss, and it is not possible to predict with reasonable certainty if, how or when such matters will be resolved or what the eventual settlement, fine, penalty or other relief, if any, may be. Numerous issues may need to be resolved before a loss or additional range of loss can be reasonably estimated, including through lengthy discovery, determination of important factual matters and the calculation of damages or other relief.
Subject to the foregoing, we do not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of currently pending matters will have not recorded a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
With respect to all legal proceedings, it is our policy to recognize legal fees as they are incurred as a sales, general and administrative expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Financial Guarantees
As of December 31, 2021, the contingent aspect of our financial guarantee was measured under ASC 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, which requires us to estimate expected credit losses, and the impact of those estimates on our required payments under the financial guarantee arrangement, for loans within our Bank Partner portfolios that are either funded or approved for funding at the measurement date, but precludes us from including future loan originations by our Bank Partners. Consistent with the modeling of loan losses for any consumer loan portfolio assumed to go into "run-off," our recognized financial guarantee liability under this model represents a significant portion of the contractual escrow that we establish with each Bank Partner. Typically, changes in the estimated financial guarantee liability as measured under ASC 326 are driven primarily by new Bank Partner loans that are facilitated on our platform during the period and thereby increase the contractual escrow balance and, to a lesser degree, by changes in underlying assumptions.
We use a discounted cash flow method to estimate our expected risk of loss under the contingent aspect of our financial guarantees for each Bank Partner. Significant assumptions for each Bank Partner portfolio used in valuing our financial guarantee liability include the following:
Loan portfolio composition: We forecasted each Bank Partner's loan portfolio composition in a "run-off" scenario, which is primarily impacted by expected loan prepayments and paydowns derived from historical behavior curves for each loan plan and were applied to each Bank Partner's portfolio based on its composition of loans and where such loans were in their economic life cycle at the measurement date. The loan portfolio composition additionally informs our forecasts of the components that determine our incentive payments or, alternatively, escrow usage. All other factors remaining constant, generally the higher the expected prepayments and pay down rates, the lower the measurement of our financial guarantee liability, as our contractual escrow balance is calculated based on the month-end outstanding portfolio balance.
Credit losses: We use lifetime historical credit loss experience for each loan plan comprising a Bank Partner's loan portfolio as a basis for estimating future credit losses. In assessing the current conditions and forecasts of future conditions as of December 31, 2018 related to2021, we primarily considered the IPO litigation.
Financial Guarantees
Under the termscurrent and expected economic impacts of the contractsCOVID-19 pandemic on the macroeconomic environment, as well as initiatives undertaken by the Company to mitigate credit losses, such as the emphasis on our Bank Partners' super-prime promotional loan programs with our Bank Partners, amerchants and offering loan deferral options to GreenSky program borrowers. All other factors remaining constant, higher credit losses reduce our incentive payments and thereby increase our risk of loss for escrow usage. Generally, higher credit losses earlier in the forecast period expose us to greater risk of loss under our financial guarantee
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
arrangements, as the contractual percentage ofescrow balance is highest early in the Bank Partners’ monthly originations and month-endforecast period in conjunction with the outstanding portfolio balance is heldin a "run-off" scenario.
As of December 31, 2021 and maintainedDecember 31, 2020, the estimated value of the escrow financial guarantee was $104.1 million and $131.9 million, respectively, relative to our $164.2 million and $173.2 million contractual escrow that was included in restricted, interest-bearing escrow accounts to serve as limited protection to the Bank Partners in the event of excess Bank Partner portfolio credit losses. The Company’s maximum exposure to Bank Partner portfolio credit losses is limited to the contractualour restricted cash balance which was $98.3 million as of December 31, 2018. The recorded fair value of the2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. We recognized financial guarantee related to these contracts was $0.6benefit of $15.2 million asand financial guarantee expense of $5.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, which was recorded within other liabilities2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. RecordedFinancial Statements. Refer to Note 1 for additional discussion of our accounting for financial guarantees are typically settled within one year of the initial measurement of the liability. In determining the measured liabilities, we consider a variety of factors, including historical experience and management’s expectations of current customer delinquencies converting into Bank Partner portfolio losses. We do not expect to directly recover any losses associated with this financial guarantee.guarantees.
Note 14.15. Related Party Transactions
Lease
We lease office space from a related party under common management control for which rent expenses arelease expense is recognized within related party expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations and for which operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized within those respective line items in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Total rent expensesoperating lease cost related to this office space was $1.7 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities related to this office space were $1,691, $1,486$2.4 million and $1,135 for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In April 2018, we entered into an agreement with an affiliate of a member of the Board of Directors whereby we receive certain executive search and recruiting services in exchange for a fee. We incurred expenses related to this arrangement of $315 during the year ended December 31, 2018, which is presented within related party expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There is no payable related to this arrangement$2.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018.2021.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Contractual and Other Arrangements
In August 2018, we entered into an agreement in which an unrelated third party acted as a placement agent in connection with certain Charged-Off Receivablescharged-off receivables transfers and received a fee from us based on the proceeds received from such transfers. In performing these services, the third party agreed to use an affiliate of a member of the board of directorsBoard and, as such, we determined this arrangement to be related party in nature. In December 2018, the unrelated third party assigned its role in the agreement to the affiliate entity itself; therefore, the arrangement remains a related party transaction. We incurred expenses related to this arrangement of $206$540 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, which are presented within related party expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations.We did not incur any expenses related to this arrangement during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. There iswas no payable related to this arrangement as of December 31, 2018.2021 and 2020.
We entered into non-interest bearing loan agreements with certain non-executive employees for which the remaining outstanding balances are forgiven ratably over designated periods based on continualcontinued employment with the Company. As of December 31, 20182021 and 2017,2020, the remaining outstanding balances on these loan agreements were $142$50 thousand and $210,$85 thousand, respectively, which are presented within related party receivablesother assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
There were no equity-based payments to non-employees that resulted in related party expenses during the year ended December 31, 2018. Equity-based payments to non-employees resulted in related party expenses of $285 and $380 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2021, 2020, or 2019.
In May 2018, we declared a special operating distributionDistributions
As of $26.2 million,December 31, 2021, there were no unpaid portions of which $1.2 million was declared to an affiliate of a related party. The unpaid portion of the related party distribution of $0.2 million isdistributions or reserved payments recorded within related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018Sheets. See Note 11 for distribution and will be paid in stages upon vesting events.payment details.
In May 2018, we used the net proceeds from the issuance of our modified term loan to provide for distributions to certain equity holders and a related party prior to the IPO. The unpaid portion of the related party distribution of $0.1 million is recorded within related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018.
In August 2017, we incurred fees of $2.6 million due to an affiliate of one of the members of the board of managers in connection with finalizing our August 2017 term loan transaction. These costs were not directly attributable to the original term loan and were, therefore, expensed as incurred rather than deferred against the term loan balance. The unpaid portion of these fees of $0.5 million as of December 31, 2018 is recorded within related party liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In November 2016, we executed a $20.0 million Bank Partner agreement (“2016 Agreement”) with affiliates of two members of our current Board of Directors. The agreement was structured similarly to the origination and servicing arrangements with the other Bank Partners, wherein the Company was required to hold restricted cash based on monthly originations and the month-end outstanding portfolio balance. In June 2018, the outstanding loans owned by these related parties were sold to another Bank Partner, which is not a related party, and continue to be serviced by us. In connection with that loan sale, the related party financing partner ended its servicing agreement with us. As of December 31, 2018, we no longer have any related party financing partner agreements.
We were entitled to collect fixed servicing fees in conjunction with the 2016 Agreement. As of December 31, 2017, our related party financing partners had committed balances in the aggregate of $11.7 million.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Consolidated Balance Sheets effects associated with our related party financing partners were as follows as of the date indicated.
|
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2017 |
Related party receivables(1) | | $ | 8 |
|
Related party liabilities(2) | | 445 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 437 |
|
| |
(1)
| Receivables related to servicing and other. |
| |
(2)
| Related party liabilities primarily consisted of related party servicing payables. |
Consolidated Statements of Operations effects associated with our two related party financing arrangements that were terminated in June 2018 and June 2017, respectively, were as follows during the years indicated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Servicing and other | | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 146 |
| | $ | 47 |
|
Related party expenses(1) | | — |
| | 428 |
| | 163 |
|
| |
(1)
| Expenses incurred related to related party financing partner credit losses. |
Note 15.16. Segment Reporting
We conduct our operations through a single operating segment and, therefore, one1 reportable segment. Operating segments are revenue-generating components of a company for which separate financial information is internally produced for regular use by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) to allocate resources and assess the performance of the business. Our CODM uses a variety of measures to assess the performance of the business; however, detailed profitability information of the nature that could be used to allocate resources and assess the performance of the business are managed and reviewed for the Company as a whole.
There are no significant concentrations by state or geographical location, nor are there any significant individual customer concentrations by balance.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Note 16.17. Variable Interest Entities
Upon completion of our IPO, GreenSky, Inc. became the managing member of GS Holdings with 100% of the management and voting power in GS Holdings. In its capacity as managing member, GreenSky, Inc. has the sole authority to make decisions on behalf of GS Holdings and bind GS Holdings to signed agreements. Further, GS Holdings maintains separate capital accounts for its investors as a mechanism for tracking earnings and subsequent distribution rights. Accordingly, management concluded that GS Holdings is a limited partnership or similar legal entity as contemplated in ASC 810, Consolidation.
Further, management concluded that GreenSky, Inc. is GS Holdings' primary beneficiary based on two conditions. First, and as such, GreenSky, Inc. consolidates the results of GS Holdings for financial reporting purposes under the variable interest consolidation model guidance in ASC 810.
GreenSky, Inc., in its capacity as managing member with sole voting rights, has the power to direct the activities of GS Holdings that most significantly impact its economic performance, including selecting, terminating and setting the compensation of management responsible for implementing GS Holdings' policies and procedures, as well as establishing the strategic, operating and capital decisions of GS Holdings in the ordinary course of business. Second, GreenSky, Inc. also has an obligation to absorb potential losses of GS Holdings or the right to receive potential benefits from GS Holdings in proportion to its equity interest, which was 30.0% as of December 31, 2018, after adjusting for unvested units.weighted average ownership interest. Management considers this exposure to be significant to GS Holdings. As the primary beneficiary, GreenSky, Inc. consolidates the results of GS Holdings for financial reporting purposes under the variable interest consolidation model guidance in ASC 810.
GreenSky, Inc.’s relationship with GS Holdings results in no recourse to the general credit of GreenSky, Inc. GS Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries represent GreenSky, Inc.’s sole investment. GreenSky, Inc. shares in the income and losses of GS Holdings in direct proportion to GreenSky, Inc.’s ownership percentage. Further,
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
GreenSky, Inc. has no contractual requirement to provide financial support to GS Holdings.
GSLLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GS Holdings and is consolidated with GS Holdings. In May 2020, GSLLC formed Depositor as an indirect subsidiary, which in turn formed the Warehouse SPV as an indirect subsidiary, for the purposes of establishing the Warehouse Facility to fund purchases of loan participations. GSLLC, on behalf of the Bank Partner that owns the loans underlying the loan participations, serves as the designated servicer of the Warehouse SPV’s loan receivables held for sale. Management concluded that the Warehouse SPV is a variable-interest entity. GSLLC is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the Warehouse SPV under the variable interest consolidation model guidance under ASC 810.
The Warehouse SPV's relationship with GSLLC results in no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Further, the Company has no contractual requirement to provide financial support to the Warehouse SPV. In addition, each of the Warehouse SPV and Depositor is a separate legal entity from the Company and from each other subsidiary of the Company, the respective assets of the Warehouse SPV and Depositor are owned by the Warehouse SPV or Depositor, respectively, and are solely available to satisfy their respective creditors. As such, neither the Warehouse SPV’s assets nor Depositor’s assets are available to satisfy obligations of GreenSky, Inc., GS Holdings, GSLLC or other subsidiaries of the Company.
Pursuant to the Facility Bank Partner Agreements, GreenSky acts as servicer on behalf of a Bank Partner for the loans with respect to which loan participations have been sold to third parties. GreenSky has concluded that the third parties that purchased loan participations are variable interest entities and, primarily as a result of this at-market servicing arrangement, GreenSky maintains a variable interest in the third party purchasers. However, as GreenSky is not the primary beneficiary of the purchasers and does not consolidate the purchasers, GreenSky lacks the power to direct the activities of the purchasers that most significantly impact their economic performance. Our exposure to loss in this context is limited to compensation provided through the related servicing arrangement and the Company would only experience a loss if it was required to repurchase a loan participation due to a breach in representations and warranties associated with its sale or servicing contracts. GreenSky did not provide any financial support to the variable interest entities in 2021. The loan participations transferred to the purchasers qualified for sales treatment under ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, as the participations were legally isolated from the Company, the purchasers had the right to freely pledge or exchange their interests in the participations, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred participations.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
Below are tabular disclosures that provide insight into how GS Holdings, inclusive of the Warehouse SPV, affects GreenSky, Inc.’s financial position, performance and cash flows. Prior to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions, GreenSky, Inc. wasdid not impacted byhave any variable interest in GS Holdings and, therefore, 2017 and 2016 periods are not presented below.Holdings.
The following table presents the balances related to GS Holdings, inclusive of the Warehouse SPV, that are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as well asof the dates indicated, inclusive of GreenSky, Inc.'s interest in the variable interest entity.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Assets | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 258,309 | | | $ | 116,231 | |
| Restricted cash | | 256,034 | | | 319,879 | |
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | | 5,320 | | | 571,415 | |
| Accounts receivable, net | | 19,105 | | | 21,958 | |
| Property, equipment and software, net | | 23,387 | | | 21,452 | |
| Other assets | | 99,809 | | | 51,965 | |
Total assets(1) | | $ | 661,964 | | | $ | 1,102,900 | |
| | | | |
| Liabilities and Members Equity (Deficit) | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 11,748 | | | $ | 15,418 | |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | | 3,505 | | | 13,666 | |
| Other accrued expenses | | 17,050 | | | 5,207 | |
| Finance charge reversal liability | | 143,529 | | | 185,134 | |
| Term loan | | 450,650 | | | 452,806 | |
| Warehouse facility | | — | | | 502,830 | |
| Financial guarantee liability | | 104,091 | | | 131,894 | |
| Other liabilities | | 82,927 | | | 80,478 | |
Total liabilities(2) | | $ | 813,500 | | | $ | 1,387,433 | |
| | | | |
| Members Equity (Deficit) | | | | |
| Equity (deficit) attributable to Continuing LLC Members | | (77,209) | | | (169,484) | |
| Equity (deficit) attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | (74,327) | | | (115,049) | |
| Total members equity (deficit) | | (151,536) | | | (284,533) | |
| Total liabilities and members equity (deficit) | | $ | 661,964 | | | $ | 1,102,900 | |
(1)Includes $12.5 million and $600.8 million of assets held by the Warehouse SPV variable interest entity ("VIE") atas of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)Includes $2.6 million and $503.9 million of liabilities held by the date indicated.Warehouse SPV variable interest entity as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
|
| | | | |
| | | December 31, 2018 |
| Assets | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 294,364 |
|
| Restricted cash | | 155,109 |
|
| Loan receivables held for sale, net | | 2,876 |
|
| Accounts receivable, net | | 15,400 |
|
| Related party receivables | | 142 |
|
| Property, equipment and software, net | | 10,232 |
|
| Other assets | | 7,448 |
|
| Total assets | | $ | 485,571 |
|
| | | |
| Liabilities and Members Equity (Deficit) | | |
| Liabilities | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 5,357 |
|
| Accrued compensation and benefits | | 8,484 |
|
| Other accrued expenses | | 1,015 |
|
| Finance charge reversal liability | | 138,589 |
|
| Term loan | | 386,822 |
|
| Related party liabilities | | 825 |
|
| Other liabilities | | 31,264 |
|
| Total liabilities | | $ | 572,356 |
|
| | | |
| Members Equity (Deficit) | | |
| Equity (deficit) attributable to Continuing LLC Members | | (60,349 | ) |
| Equity (deficit) attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | (26,436 | ) |
| Total members equity (deficit) | | (86,785 | ) |
| Total liabilities and members equity (deficit) | | $ | 485,571 |
|
The following table reflects the impact of consolidation of GS Holdings, inclusive of the Warehouse SPV, into the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periodyears indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Total revenue | | $ | 518,074 | | | $ | 525,649 | | | $ | 532,622 | |
| Total costs and expenses | | 356,872 | | | 473,109 | | | 414,366 | |
| Operating profit | | 161,202 | | | 52,540 | | | 118,256 | |
| Total other income (expense), net | | (29,508) | | | (20,985) | | | (19,600) | |
| Net income | | $ | 131,694 | | | $ | 31,555 | | | $ | 98,656 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| Total revenue | | $ | 414,673 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | | 261,883 |
|
| Operating profit | | 152,790 |
|
| Total other income/(expense), net | | (19,276 | ) |
| Net income | | $ | 133,514 |
|
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
The following table reflects the cash flow impact of GS Holdings, inclusive of the Warehouse SPV, on the Consolidated StatementStatements of Cash Flows for the periodyears indicated. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2021 | | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities | | $ | 630,901 | | | $ | (468,101) | | | $ | 153,327 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (15,602) | | | (14,567) | | | (15,381) | |
| Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities | | (537,066) | | | 490,967 | | | (159,608) | |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | | 78,233 | | | 8,299 | | | (21,662) | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | | 436,110 | | | 427,811 | | | 449,473 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | | $ | 514,343 | | | $ | 436,110 | | | $ | 427,811 | |
|
| | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 256,426 |
|
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (6,581 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | | (154,210 | ) |
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | | 95,635 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | | 353,838 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | | $ | 449,473 |
|
Note 17. Temporary Equity
Prior to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions, GreenSky Holdings, LLC had outstanding Class B and Class C Preferred Units, which were accounted for as temporary equity because of redemption preferences. The redemption preferences were waived on both the Class B and Class C Preferred Units in conjunction with the IPO and, therefore, temporary equity had a balance of $0 as of December 31, 2018. Below are more details on the accounting treatment prior to the IPO and Reorganization Transactions.
Class B Preferred Units
Prior to the IPO, Class B unit holders collectively were entitled to a liquidation preference prior to any distribution to the holders of any other equity securities, which liquidation preference became null and void upon consummation of the IPO. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2018, the Class B liquidation preference was of no further effect because of the IPO. As of December 31, 2017, the redemption amount of the Class B Preferred Units, which was adjusted for non-tax GS Holdings member distributions, was $215.8 million. The liquidation preference was further adjusted for non-tax GS Holdings distributions during 2018 prior to the IPO.
Class C Preferred Units
Prior to the IPO, Class C-1 and C-2 unit holders collectively were entitled to a liquidation preference prior to any distribution to Class A unit holders, but in the event of an IPO, the Class C units automatically convert into GS Holdings Class A units immediately prior to the IPO. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2018, Class C-1 and C-2 liquidation preferences were of no further effect because of the IPO. As of December 31, 2017, the redemption amounts of the Class C-1 and Class C-2 Preferred Units, which were adjusted for non-tax GS Holdings member distributions, were $191.4 million for Class C-1 Preferred Units and $43.0 million for Class C-2 Preferred Units. The liquidation preferences were further adjusted for non-tax GS Holdings distributions during 2018 prior to the IPO.
Note 18. Quarterly Consolidated Results of Operations Data (Unaudited)
The following table sets forth our quarterly consolidated resultsunaudited Consolidated Statements of operationsOperations data for each of the eight quarters in the periodyears ended December 31, 2018. GS Holdings2021 and GSLLC are our predecessors for accounting purposes and, accordingly, amounts2020. The information presented below reflects reclassifications made to prior quarters to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO represent the historical consolidated operations of either GS Holdings or GSLLC and subsidiaries. The amounts during theconform with current period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018 represent those of consolidated GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Basic and diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock is applicable only for the period from May 24, 2018 through December 31, 2018, which is the period following the Reorganization Transactions and IPO. Prior to the Reorganization Transactions and IPO, GreenSky, Inc. did not engage in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and initial capitalization.presentation. See Note 1 for further information on our organization and reclassifications, and see Note 2 for further information on our earnings per share.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Total |
| Total revenue | $ | 125,172 | | | $ | 136,518 | | | $ | 128,149 | | | $ | 128,235 | | | $ | 518,074 | |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 63,997 | | | 43,935 | | | 33,867 | | | 57,105 | | | 198,904 | |
| Total costs and expenses | 105,456 | | | 79,314 | | | 78,755 | | | 93,347 | | | 356,872 | |
| Operating profit | 19,716 | | | 57,204 | | | 49,394 | | | 34,888 | | | 161,202 | |
| Total other income (expense), net | (5,719) | | | (5,911) | | | (5,249) | | | (12,629) | | | (29,508) | |
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 13,997 | | | 51,293 | | | 44,145 | | | 22,259 | | | 131,694 | |
| Net income | 12,125 | | | 46,711 | | | 39,777 | | | 19,201 | | | 117,814 | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 8,327 | | | 30,381 | | | 25,388 | | | 11,574 | | | 75,670 | |
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | 3,798 | | | 16,330 | | | 14,389 | | | 7,627 | | | 42,144 | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock: | | | | | | | | |
Basic(1) | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.23 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
Diluted(1) | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | 0.19 | | | $ | 0.09 | | | $ | 0.55 | |
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Total |
| Total revenue | $ | 85,326 |
| | $ | 105,704 |
| | $ | 113,912 |
| | $ | 109,731 |
| | $ | 414,673 |
|
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 36,130 |
| | 33,765 |
| | 35,374 |
| | 55,170 |
| | 160,439 |
|
| Total costs and expenses | 61,749 |
| | 58,896 |
| | 59,655 |
| | 81,583 |
| | 261,883 |
|
| Operating profit | 23,577 |
| | 46,808 |
| | 54,257 |
| | 28,148 |
| | 152,790 |
|
| Total other income/(expense), net | (4,973 | ) | | (4,398 | ) | | (5,170 | ) | | (4,735 | ) | | (19,276 | ) |
| Income before income tax expense | 18,604 |
| | 42,410 |
| | 49,087 |
| | 23,413 |
| | 133,514 |
|
| Net income | 18,604 |
| | 40,816 |
| | 45,712 |
| | 22,848 |
| | 127,980 |
|
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 18,604 |
| | 35,266 |
| | 33,711 |
| | 16,143 |
| | 103,724 |
|
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | N/A |
| | 5,550 |
| | 12,001 |
| | 6,705 |
| | 24,256 |
|
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock: | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | N/A |
| | $ | 0.10 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 0.12 |
| | $ | 0.43 |
|
Diluted(1) | N/A |
| | $ | 0.09 |
| | $ | 0.20 |
| | $ | 0.11 |
| | $ | 0.41 |
|
(1) Year-to-dateTotal annual results may not agree to the sum of individual quarterly results due to rounding.
GreenSky, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(United States Dollars in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)
| | | | Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | Year Ended December 31, 2020 |
| | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Total | | First Quarter | | Second Quarter | | Third Quarter | | Fourth Quarter | | Total |
| Total revenue | $ | 65,337 |
| | $ | 82,420 |
| | $ | 88,316 |
| | $ | 89,814 |
| | $ | 325,887 |
| Total revenue | $ | 121,857 | | | $ | 132,962 | | | $ | 142,023 | | | $ | 128,807 | | | $ | 525,649 | |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 23,299 |
| | 23,193 |
| | 22,036 |
| | 21,180 |
| | 89,708 |
| Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization) | 72,305 | | | 65,377 | | | 92,728 | | | 78,872 | | | 309,282 | |
| Total costs and expenses | 43,745 |
| | 45,081 |
| | 48,224 |
| | 43,238 |
| | 180,288 |
| Total costs and expenses | 129,649 | | | 113,292 | | | 132,807 | | | 97,361 | | | 473,109 | |
| Operating profit | 21,592 |
| | 37,339 |
| | 40,092 |
| | 46,576 |
| | 145,599 |
| Operating profit | (7,792) | | | 19,670 | | | 9,216 | | | 31,446 | | | 52,540 | |
| Total other income/(expense), net | 419 |
| | 1,254 |
| | (1,930 | ) | | (6,674 | ) | | (6,931 | ) | |
| Income before income tax expense | 22,011 |
| | 38,593 |
| | 38,162 |
| | 39,902 |
| | 138,668 |
| |
| Total other income (expense), net | | Total other income (expense), net | (4,022) | | | (4,818) | | | (6,208) | | | (7,233) | | | (22,281) | |
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | | Income before income tax expense (benefit) | (11,814) | | | 14,852 | | | 3,008 | | | 24,213 | | | 30,259 | |
| Net income | 22,011 |
| | 38,593 |
| | 38,162 |
| | 39,902 |
| | 138,668 |
| Net income | (10,919) | | | 13,355 | | | 2,811 | | | 23,415 | | | 28,662 | |
| Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | | Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | (7,585) | | | 9,222 | | | 1,850 | | | 15,210 | | | 18,697 | |
| Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | | Net income attributable to GreenSky, Inc. | (3,334) | | | 4,133 | | | 961 | | | 8,205 | | | 9,965 | |
| Earnings per share of Class A common stock: | | Earnings per share of Class A common stock: | |
Basic(1) | | Basic(1) | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.15 | |
Diluted(1) | | Diluted(1) | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.01 | | | $ | 0.11 | | | $ | 0.14 | |
(1)Total annual results may not agree to the sum of individual quarterly results due to rounding. Note 19. Subsequent Events
Treasury Stock PurchasesManagement determined that the following events subsequent to December 31, 2021 required disclosure:
From January 1, 2019 throughDistributions
GS Holdings finalized and paid tax distributions of $7.0 million to its members (including GreenSky, Inc.).
Amended Warehouse Facility
The Company amended its Warehouse Facility to extend the commitment termination date to March 14, 2019, we purchased 1,238,860 shares of Class A common stock at a cost of $12.7 million on31, 2022 and amend the open market. Additionally, onfinal maturity date to March 8, 2019, we purchased 2,743,052 shares of Class A common stock in a privately negotiated transaction at a cost of $34.4 million.31, 2023, as well as to include certain LIBOR transition provisions.
Warrant Exercises
In January 2019, the 1,304,640 warrants issued on January 1, 2014 were fully exercised for 1,180,163 Holdco Units and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of December 31, 2018,2021, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”)), was carried out by our management and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer). Based upon the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018.2021.
Exemption from Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
This annual report on Form 10-K does not include a report of management's assessment regardingOur management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controlscontrol over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act, for the Company. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under management's supervision, an attestation reportevaluation of the Company'seffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 was conducted based on the framework established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in "Internal Control – Integrated Framework" (2013). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, due to a transition period established by rulesPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021, which is included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018,2021, no changechanges in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) occurred that hashave materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
None
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors of GreenSky
Our directors are elected during our annual meeting in the year in which their term expires, or until their successor is elected and qualified. The following sets forth the name, age as of the Record Date, selected biographical information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information containedand period of service for our directors. Mr. David Zalik, our Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Gerald Benjamin, our Chief Administrative Officer, also serve as directors of GreenSky. Their biographies are provided below under the captions "Proposal One: Election of Directors," "Executive Officers of GreenSky,GreenSky." "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance"
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Age | | Position |
| Joel Babbit | | 67 | | Chairperson, Governance and Nominating Committee Member, Audit, Compensation and Compliance Committees
|
| Arthur Bacci | | 62 | | Chairperson, Audit Committee Chairperson, Compliance Committee |
| Gregg Freishtat | | 54 | | Chairperson, Compensation Committee Member, Audit and Governance and Nominating Committees |
Joel Babbit has served as a member of our board of directors since 2015. Mr. Babbit is the Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Narrative Content Group, LLC, one of the leading resources for the production and distribution of digital content. Prior to launching Narrative Content Group in 2009, Mr. Babbit spent more than 20 years in the advertising and public relations industry, creating two of the largest advertising agencies in the Southeastern U.S.—Babbit and Reiman (acquired by London-based GGT) and 360 (acquired by WPP Group's Grey Global Group). Following the acquisition of 360 in 2002, he served as President and Chief Creative Officer of the resulting entity, Grey Atlanta, until 2009. He also previously served as President of WPP Group's GCI Group Inc., a public relations firm, and as Executive Vice President and General Manager for the New York office of advertising agency Chiat/Day Inc. Following his hometown of Atlanta being awarded the 1996 Summer Olympics, and at the request of Mayor Maynard Jackson, Mr. Babbit took a leave of absence from the private sector to serve as Chief Marketing and Communications Officer for the City of Atlanta and as a member of the Mayor's cabinet. Mr. Babbit has served on the Board of Directors of Primerica, Inc. since 2011. He received an A.B.J. degree from The University of Georgia. Mr. Babbit's experience of over 35 years in both traditional and digital marketing, branding and corporate communications, together with his social media and entrepreneurial experience, qualify him to serve as a member of our Board.
Arthur Bacci has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2019. Mr. Bacci has held the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Wealth Officer of WSFS Financial Corporation, a savings and loan holding company, since April 2018. Prior to joining WSFS, Mr. Bacci was a Vice President at Principal Financial Group, a diversified global investment management firm, where he ultimately served as Head of Principal’s Hong Kong business from 2013 to 2018. He joined Principal in 2002 as Chief Financial Officer of Principal Trust Company (in Delaware), and he subsequently was named Chief Executive Officer and President of the trust company and Principal Bank. Mr. Bacci received his undergraduate degree in Finance from San Jose State University and an MBA from Santa Clara University. He has also participated in leadership and management programs at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School. Mr. Bacci's extensive experience in the financial services industry qualifies him to serve as a member of our Board.
Gregg Freishtat has served as a member of our board of directors since 2014. In January 2018, Mr. Freishtat co-founded Solar Inventions LLC, a solar energy company, and has served as its Chief Commercial Officer since that time. From January 2014 to the founding of Solar Inventions, Mr. Freishtat served as Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of SalesWise, Inc., a technology company that provides business relationship intelligence. Prior to that, he was the Senior Vice President of Strategic Alliances at Outbrain Inc. Mr. Freishtat is a technology executive with over 20 years of experience leading innovative and transformative companies. He has founded four venture-backed start-ups, all of which had successful exits. Deeply rooted in venture capital and management of internet technology companies, he has led several companies through acquisition and has been involved in developing disruptive technologies in convergence of telecommunications/internet, personal finance/online banking,
web based analytics and digital media/online marketing and currently relationship intelligence. Mr. Freishtat received an undergraduate degree from Boston University and his J.D. from the University of Maryland Law School. Mr. Freishtat's extensive experience with disruptive technologies and rapidly growing ventures qualify him to serve as a member of our Board.
Executive Officers of GreenSky
Our executive officers are elected annually and serve at the pleasure of the Board. The following sets forth the name, age as of the Record Date, position(s) with GreenSky and selected biographical information for our executive officers.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | | Age | | Position |
| David Zalik | | 48 | | Chief Executive Officer, Director and Chairman of the Board |
| Gerald Benjamin | | 64 | | Chief Administrative Officer, Director and Vice Chairman |
| Andrew Kang | | 46 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Tim Kaliban | | 56 | | President and Chief Risk Officer |
| Ritesh Gupta | | 46 | | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
David Zalik has served as our Chief Executive Officer since co-founding GreenSky in 2006 and has served as a member of our Board since 2014. Prior to co-founding GreenSky, Mr. Zalik founded MicroTech Information Systems, a computer hardware assembly company, and sold the business in 1996. Mr. Zalik also founded Outweb, a web and mobile-development consulting firm, and formerly was a director of RockBridge Commercial Bank. Mr. Zalik was the recipient of the 2016 Ernst & Young National Financial Services Entrepreneur of the Year Award. We believe Mr. Zalik is qualified to serve in his current capacity as Chief Executive Officer and a director because of his substantial operating, product strategy and industry expertise gained from his previous background as well as his current role as CEO of GreenSky.
Gerald Benjamin has served as our Vice Chairman since 2014 and as our Chief Administrative Officer since February 2018. Prior to joining GreenSky, Mr. Benjamin served as the Managing Partner of Atlanta Equity Investors, a middle market private equity firm; Head of Investment Banking at Navigant Capital Advisors; Senior Managing Director at Casas, Benjamin & White LLC, a national restructuring and mergers and acquisitions advisory firm; and CEO of Premier Healthcare, Inc., a health care services venture development and management company. Mr. Benjamin is a CPA and received a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from the University of Kentucky, where he was named a Coopers & Lybrand Scholar. Mr. Benjamin's 35 years of operating, investment banking, corporate finance advisory, principal investing, and restructuring experience qualify him to serve as a member of our Board.
Andrew Kang has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2020. Mr. Kang has over 20 years of experience in banking and consumer finance and most recently served as Corporate Treasurer for Santander Holdings USA, the $150 billion U.S. bank holding company of Banco Santander S.A., and for Santander Consumer USA, a full spectrum auto finance company. Mr. Kang was responsible for all funding, liquidity and bank relationships, where he oversaw over $50 billion in securitizations, private credit facilities and asset sales. Mr. Kang also was responsible for asset liability management, capital management, strategic planning, and investor relations. Previously, Mr. Kang held positions in finance and treasury at Exeter Finance, HSBC Finance, Capital One and Thomson Reuters, managing financial reporting, accounting, audit, and internal controls for both public and private companies. Mr. Kang received his Bachelor of Arts in Biology and post-baccalaureate certification in Accounting, both from the University of Virginia.
Tim Kaliban has served as our President and Chief Risk Officer since 2012. Prior to joining GreenSky, Mr. Kaliban served as the Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Risk and Portfolio Management for TCM Bank, a leading provider of consumer and business credit card services to over 600 banks nationwide. Previously, Mr. Kaliban also directed product management and delivery for the card services division of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc., an international financial services and payments processor. Prior thereto, he headed the card services unit of BankNorth, managing credit card, debit card, merchant, ATM and agent bank services. Mr. Kaliban received a B.A. from Middlebury College and an M.B.A. from Tulane University.
Ritesh Gupta has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since July 2021. From October 2018 through June 2021, Mr. Gupta served as our Executive Vice President, Operations of the Company. Prior to joining GreenSky, Mr. Gupta served as Chief Operating Officer at CAN Capital, a financial technology company in small business lending, where he led operations and technology development functions with responsibilities that included sales operations, credit underwriting operations, customer servicing, collections, product management and technology re‐platforming strategy. Previously, Mr. Gupta served as Vice President of Operations for Capital One Bank and played a variety of leadership roles in credit card operations, technology, partnerships and procurement. Earlier in his career, Mr. Gupta worked at ITC Ltd. India leading manufacturing operations. Mr. Gupta holds a Bachelor of Technology in Engineering from I.I.T. Kanpur, India and an M.B.A. from I.I.M. Ahmedabad, India.
Corporate Governance
We have established corporate governance practices designed to serve the best interests of GreenSky and its stockholders. We are in compliance with the current corporate governance requirements imposed by the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq. Our current Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and charters for the standing committees of the Board are available on our investor website atinvestors.greensky.com under the heading "Corporate Governance"Governance."
Set forth below is information regarding the meetings of the Board during 2021, a description of the Board's standing committees and additional information about our corporate governance policies and procedures.
Committees and Meetings of the Board
Board Composition. The size of our Board is currently fixed at five directors. The current members of the Board are Joel Babbit, Arthur Bacci, Gerald Benjamin, Gregg Freishtat, and David Zalik. The Board has determined that Messrs. Babbit, Bacci, and Freishtat are independent in our definitive Proxy Statementaccordance with the Nasdaq and SEC rules governing director independence.
Meetings of the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors should be prepared for and attend Board meetings and actively participate in Board discussions. The Board met 12 times during 2021. During that period, each of the incumbent directors attended at least 100% of the aggregate number of meetings held by the Board and by each of the committees on which such director served.
Board Committees. We have three standing committees: an Audit Committee; a Governance and Nominating Committee and a Compensation Committee. Allocating responsibilities among these standing committees increases the amount of attention that can be devoted to the Board's oversight of GreenSky's business and affairs. The principal functions and the names of the directors currently serving as members of each of these committees are set forth below. In accordance with applicable Nasdaq and SEC requirements, the Board has determined that each director serving on the Audit, Compensation and Governance and Nominating committees is an independent director.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to our 2019 financial matters. Its principal responsibilities include: oversight of the effectiveness of our accounting, auditing and financial reporting processes; the integrity of our financial statements; the effectiveness of our internal controls, policies and procedures for managing and assessing risk and promoting compliance with accounting standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and the appointment, compensation and evaluation of the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.
The Audit Committee met seven times during 2021. The current members of the Audit Committee are Arthur Bacci (Chairman), Joel Babbit and Gregg Freishtat. The Board has determined that Mr. Bacci is an "audit committee financial expert," as that term is defined in SEC rules.
Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee assists the Board in identifying qualified director candidates, developing and monitoring our corporate governance policies and overseeing the evaluation of the Board. Its principal responsibilities include: identifying individuals qualified to become members of the Board and recommending candidates for election as directors; reviewing and reassessing GreenSky's corporate governance policies and practices; overseeing performance reviews of the Board as a whole, its committees and the individual directors; and overseeing succession planning for GreenSky's executive officers.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Governance and Nominating Committee shall work with the Board to determine periodically, as appropriate, the desired Board qualifications, expertise and characteristics, including such factors as business experience and diversity. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board evaluate each director in the context of the membership of the Board as a group, with the objective of having a group that can best perpetuate the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgement using its diversity of background and experience in the various areas. Each director is expected to be an individual of high character and integrity. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Governance and Nominating Committee also considers the director's past attendance at meetings, participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board and GreenSky and other qualifications and characteristics set forth in the Governance and Nominating Committee's charter. For more information, see "—Corporate Governance Policies—Policy for Consideration of Director Candidates Recommended by Stockholders."
The Governance and Nominating Committee has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the members of the Governance and Nominating Committee consider and discuss diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of the Board as a whole. The members of the Governance and Nominating Committee generally conceptualize diversity expansively to include factors such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional background, education, skill and other individual qualities and attributes that contribute to the total mix of viewpoints and experience represented on the Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with its goal of creating a Board that best serves the needs of GreenSky and the interests of its stockholders.
The Governance and Nominating Committee met one time during 2021. The current members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are Joel Babbit (Chairman) and Gregg Freishtat.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the primary authority to determine our compensation philosophy, establish compensation for our executive officers and make recommendations regarding director compensation to the Board. Its principal responsibilities include establishing and periodically reviewing our compensation philosophy and the adequacy of compensation plans and programs for executive officers, employees and directors; conducting an annual review of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers and determining their compensation; evaluating director compensation and making recommendations to the Board regarding director compensation; administering our employee benefit plans, including equity-based plans; and evaluating how our compensation philosophy, policies and practices relate to GreenSky's risk management processes and procedures and whether risk-taking incentives are consistent with GreenSky's overall risk profile.
The Compensation Committee met three times during 2021. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Gregg Freishtat (Chairman) and Joel Babbit. For more information on the Compensation Committee, see "—Corporate Governance Policies—Consideration and Determination of Executive and Director Compensation."
Corporate Governance Policies
In addition to corporate governance matters described throughout this Proxy Statement, certain additional information about our corporate governance policies and procedures is set forth below:
Code of Ethics. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which we refer to as the "Code of Ethics," applies to all of our directors, officers, employees and independent contractors. The Code of Ethics is available on our investor website atinvestors.greensky.com under the heading "Corporate Governance."
Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board adopted the GreenSky, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines, which give effect to Nasdaq's requirements related to corporate governance and various other corporate governance matters. The Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the Board's commitment to effective corporate governance, with a view to enhancing long-term stockholder value. Topics addressed in the Corporate Governance Guidelines include:
•Independence of the Board
•Director qualifications
•Committees of the Board
•Limitation on other board service
•Director conflicts of interest
•Board access to management and independent auditors
•Director orientation and continuing education
•Annual Meeting.review of the Chief Executive Officer
•Succession planning for executive officers
A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on our investor website atinvestors.greensky.com under the heading "Corporate Governance."
Risk Management. GreenSky's management is responsible for day-to-day risk management of the Company, subject to oversight by the Board and its committees with regard to the major risks inherent in our business, including strategic, regulatory, compliance, operational, financial, reputational and cybersecurity risks, and the efforts of management to address and mitigate such risks.
The Board receives regular reports concerning our enterprise risk management program from the Audit Committee, which meets periodically with our internal and independent auditors, with our Chief Legal Officer and Chief Compliance Officer and with management. In addition to receiving regular reports from the Audit Committee related to our enterprise risk management program, the Board also reviews information regarding other risks through regular reports of its other committees, including information regarding compensation related risk from the Compensation Committee and governance related risk from the Governance and Nominating Committee.
We believe the division of risk management responsibilities described above is an effective approach for addressing the risks that we face.
Restrictions on Hedging and Pledging Arrangements. The Board believes it is undesirable for GreenSky's directors, officers, employees and independent contractors to engage in hedging or pledging transactions that lock in the value of holdings in the equity securities of GreenSky or its affiliates, including our Class A common stock, as such transactions allow insiders to own GreenSky's equity securities without the full risks and rewards of ownership and potentially separate their interests from those of the public stockholders. Accordingly, the Board has adopted anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies that generally prohibit directors, officers, employees and independent contractors of GreenSky and its affiliates from: (i) selling GreenSky's securities short; (ii) holding GreenSky's securities in a margin account or pledging GreenSky's securities as collateral for a loan; (iii) entering into hedging, monetization transactions or similar arrangements, including forward sale or purchase contracts, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds, with respect to GreenSky's securities; and (iv) engaging in transactions in puts, calls or other derivative instruments that relate to or involve GreenSky's securities.
Risk Management Related to Compensation Policies and Practices. We do not believe our compensation policies or practices encourage excessive or unnecessary risk-taking nor do we believe the level of risk they do encourage is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on GreenSky. The design of our compensation policies and practices encourages our employees to remain focused on both our short- and long-term goals. For example, while our Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) and any cash bonus awards measure performance on an annual basis, our equity awards typically vest over a number of years, which we believe encourages our employees to focus on sustained stock price appreciation, thus limiting the potential value of excessive risk-taking. Our Stock Ownership Guidelines further serve to discourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking. Our Compensation Committee has authority to consider and evaluate how GreenSky's compensation philosophy, policies and practices relate to its risk management processes and procedures and whether risk-taking incentives are consistent with its overall risk profile.
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the independent directors shall meet in executive session on a periodic basis but no less than twice per year. At executive sessions, our independent directors meet without management or any non-independent directors present. The Board believes that executive sessions foster open and frank communication among the independent directors and add to the Board's effectiveness.
Consideration and Determination of Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors. The Compensation Committee has the primary authority to determine our compensation philosophy and to establish compensation for
our executive officers. In establishing executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee uses its subjective evaluation of the performance and responsibilities of our executive officers, our overall performance and the Chief Executive Officer's recommendations, including evaluating employee performance and recommending salary levels and equity awards. In addition, the Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant to advise regarding the status of GreenSky's executive officer compensation in relation to comparable companies.
In addition to the Chief Executive Officer, other members of management play a role in the executive compensation process. The most significant aspects of management's role are (i) preparing information for Compensation Committee meetings; (ii) establishing business performance targets and objectives; and (iii) providing background information regarding GreenSky's strategic objectives.
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the compensation of independent directors is determined by the Board upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The guidelines further provide that, once a year, GreenSky's senior management or a compensation consultant report to the Compensation Committee regarding the status of GreenSky's director compensation in relation to comparable companies. The Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant to provide such services.
For more information, see "Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis".
Committee Authority to Retain Independent Advisors. Each of the Audit Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain independent advisors and consultants, with all fees and expenses paid by GreenSky.
Board Leadership Structure. David Zalik has served in the combined roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since our initial public offering ("IPO"). Mr. Zalik's combined service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer creates unified leadership for GreenSky. This leadership structure demonstrates to our business partners and stockholders that GreenSky is under strong leadership and minimizes the potential duplication of efforts among management and the directors. The Board does not have a lead independent director and does not believe that one is necessary in light of GreenSky's size. The Board believes its leadership structure allows GreenSky to operate efficiently and is in the best interests of GreenSky and its stockholders.
No Executive Loans. We do not extend loans to executive officers or directors, and we have no such loans outstanding.
Policy for Director Attendance at Annual Meetings. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director is strongly encouraged to attend each Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our directors attended our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Process for Stockholders to Send Communications to the Board. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that stockholders should have the opportunity to send communications to the non-management members of our Board. Any stockholder who wishes to communicate with the Board or with any particular director, including any independent director, may send a letter to the Corporate Secretary of GreenSky at our principal executive offices. Each communication should set forth (i) the name and address of the stockholder, as it appears on GreenSky's books, and if the stockholder's Class A common stock is held by a nominee, the name and address of the beneficial owner of GreenSky's Class A common stock and (ii) the number of shares of GreenSky's Class A common stock owned by such stockholder. The Corporate Secretary, in consultation with appropriate directors as necessary, reviews all incoming stockholder communications (except for mass mailings, product complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, business solicitations and patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material) and, if appropriate, routes such communications to the appropriate director(s) or, if none is specified, to the entire Board.
Policy for Consideration of Director Candidates Recommended by Stockholders. We welcome recommendations for director candidates from stockholders. In order to make a recommendation, a stockholder should submit the following information to the Governance and Nominating Committee:
•a résumé for the candidate detailing the candidate's work experience and academic credentials;
•written confirmation from the candidate that he or she (i) would like to be considered as a candidate and would serve if nominated and elected, (ii) consents to the disclosure of his or her name, (iii) has read
our Code of Ethics and that during the prior three years has not engaged in any conduct that, had he or she been a director, would have violated the Code of Ethics or required a waiver, (iv) is, or is not, "independent" as that term is defined by Nasdaq and SEC rules, and (v) has no plans to change or influence the control of GreenSky;
•the name of the recommending stockholder as it appears in our books, the number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock that is owned by the stockholder and written confirmation that the stockholder consents to the disclosure of his or her name (if the recommending person is not a stockholder of record, he or she should provide proof of share ownership);
•personal and professional references, including contact information; and
•any other information relating to the candidate required to be disclosed in a proxy statement for election of directors under Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
This information should be sent to the Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices, who will forward it to the chairperson of the Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not necessarily respond to stockholder recommendations.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of any class of our equity securities, who collectively we generally refer to as insiders, to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of Class A common stock and other equity securities of GreenSky. Our insiders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to us, we believe that during the 2021 fiscal year our insiders complied with all applicable filing requirements, except that Mr. Babbit made one late filing reporting two transactions, and Mr. Gupta made one late filing reporting one transaction.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Executive and Director Compensation
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") describes our underlying compensation philosophy, our compensation programs, and the fundamental elements of compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers ("NEOs") whose 2021 compensation information is provided in the tables following this discussion. Our NEOs for 2021 are set forth in the following table: | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Title |
| David Zalik | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Gerald Benjamin | | Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer |
| Tim Kaliban | | President and Chief Risk Officer |
| Andrew Kang | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Ritesh Gupta | | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer(1) |
(1)On July 1, 2021 Mr. Gupta transitioned from Executive Vice President, Operations of the Company to Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.
Executive Summary
For a Company overview, see Part I, Item 1 "Business." For Financial Condition and Results of Operations, see Part II, Item 7 "Executive Summary."
| | | | | |
| 2021 Performance and Impact on Pay Decisions |
| Action | Additional Considerations |
| No base salary increases for our NEOs. | •Mr. Zalik's and Mr. Benjamin's base salaries have been unchanged since 2016, base salary for Mr. Kaliban has been unchanged since 2019 and base salary for Mr. Kang has been unchanged from 2020. |
| As a result of 2021 performance and the impact of COVID-19, the Compensation Committee used discretion to determine cash payouts for our NEOs. | •All of our NEOs received discretionary cash payouts. |
| Long-term incentive (LTI) awards to our NEOs (other than our CEO who did not receive an LTI award in 2021) were delivered in the form of restricted stock. | •Due to Mr. Zalik's ownership interest in GreenSky, he has elected not to receive an annual LTI award. |
Say-on-Pay
At our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders voted to hold a stockholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of the Named Executive Officers annually. Accordingly, we hold "say-on-pay" votes every year and did so at our 2021 Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the say-on-pay vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.
| | | | | | | | |
| Alignment with Stockholder Interests: What We Do and Don't Do |
| What We Do | | What We Don't Do |
þ Provide the majority of compensation in the form of annual and long-term incentives | | ý No excise tax gross-ups in the event of a change of control |
þ Maintain a strong link between financial goals, stockholder value creation and executive compensation | | ý Executive officers and non-employee directors are subject to anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies adopted by the Board |
þ Use an independent compensation consultant that is engaged directly by the Compensation Committee to advise on executive compensation matters | | ý No repricing of underwater stock options |
þ Maintain stock ownership guidelines for executives and non-employee directors | | ý No stock options granted with an exercise price less than fair market value. All stock options are granted with an exercise price at the closing price on the date of grant |
| | ý No guaranteed bonuses |
| | ý No significant perquisites |
Compensation Philosophy and How Pay Decisions are Made
Compensation Philosophy
We strive to provide our employees, including our executive officers, with meaningful rewards while maintaining alignment with stockholder interests, corporate values and strategic priorities. In setting and overseeing the compensation of our executive officers, the Compensation Committee believes our compensation philosophy to be best effectuated by designing compensation programs and policies to achieve the following specific objectives:
•Attracting, motivating, and retaining highly capable executives who contribute to our short- and long-term success, profitability, and growth;
•Aligning the interests of our executives and stockholders by rewarding executives for creating long-term stockholder value; and
•Differentiating executive compensation based on actual performance and individual contributions.
Factors in Setting Executive Officer Pay
In establishing executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee uses its subjective evaluation of the performance and responsibilities of our executive officers, our overall performance and the Chief Executive Officer's recommendations for each of the NEOs other than himself.
From time to time, the Compensation Committee invites members of management, including David Zalik, Gerald Benjamin, Andrew Kang, Lois Rickard and Steven Fox, to attend all or a portion of its meetings. Typically, Messrs. Zalik and Benjamin review the performance of senior management and make recommendations on compensation levels for the NEOs other than themselves, Mr. Kang provides financial information related to those recommendations, Ms. Rickard advises the Compensation Committee on employee performance and market data, and Mr. Fox advises the Compensation Committee on legal matters and prepares documents for the Compensation Committee's consideration. In addition, these officers answer questions posed by the Compensation Committee.
In the past, the Company has reviewed peer group data to evaluate compensation levels. For 2021, in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and pending merger, the Compensation Committee did not approve any salary increases for executive officers and used its discretion to evaluate 2021 performance.
| | | | | |
| Roles and Responsibilities in Setting Executive Officer Compensation |
Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee is currently composed of two independent directors and reports to the Board. | •Evaluates CEO performance and GreenSky's overall performance •Determines and approves compensation for our executive officers •Retains an independent compensation consultant to assist it in evaluating compensation and fulfilling its obligations as set forth in its charter |
Consultant to the Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee has retained independent consultants to provide consulting advice on matters of governance and executive compensation. | •Performs all functions at the direction of the Compensation Committee •Attends committee meetings, as requested •Provides advice and opinion on the appropriateness and competitiveness of our compensation programs relative to market practice, our strategy and internal processes •Provides advice regarding compensation decision-making governance |
| Management (including the Chairman & CEO) | •Evaluates employee performance •Prepares information for Compensation Committee meetings •Establishes business performance targets and objectives •Provides background information regarding GreenSky's strategic objectives •Recommends salary levels, annual incentive and equity awards |
Executive Compensation Program Structure
Our executive compensation program is typically composed of three primary components: | | | | | | | | |
| Pay Element | | Description |
| Salary | | •Provides a competitive amount of fixed compensation |
| Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) bonus | | •Provides additional compensation opportunity if financial and/or individual goals are achieved |
| Long-Term Incentives (LTI) | | •Creates alignment with executives and stockholders with grants of restricted stock and stock options |
The Compensation Committee allocates target pay, among the above components, to place a greater emphasis on annual incentive and equity-based pay (i.e., restricted stock and stock options). This mix ensures the appropriate alignment of executive compensation with financial performance and stockholder value creation. For NEOs (other than our CEO), actual pay can differ versus target pay based on corporate or individual performance against goals (annual incentive) and changes in our stock price (restricted stock and stock options). For 2021, the pay mix for our NEOs (other than our CEO) for 2021 was approximately 28% in salaries and 72% in annual and long-term incentives. The pay mix orientation toward incentive pay opportunities was designed to motivate our NEOs (other than our CEO) to achieve certain operational outcomes, achieve a higher share price and retain them going forward to continue our growth and profitability.
2021 Compensation Program
Salaries
The Compensation Committee reviews the salaries of our executive officers every year. The table below shows that the salaries for all NEOs who served during 2021 were unchanged from 2020: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Title | | 2020 Salary | | 2021 Salary | | % Change |
| David Zalik | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | 500,000 | | | —% |
| Gerald Benjamin | | Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer | | $ | 450,000 | | | $ | 450,000 | | | —% |
| Tim Kaliban | | President and Chief Risk Officer | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | 400,000 | | | —% |
| Andrew Kang | | EVP and Chief Financial Officer | | $ | 650,000 | | (1) | $ | 650,000 | | | —% |
| Ritesh Gupta | | EVP and Chief Operating Officer | | $ | — | | | $ | 400,000 | | | N/A |
(1)2020 salary reflects the annualized value.
At the recommendation of our CEO, the Compensation Committee does not anticipate increasing the salary of any executive officer in 2022.
Annual Incentive Plan
The GreenSky, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) is designed to reward employees, including executive officers, if specified performance goals are achieved and to encourage the creation of stockholder value by establishing a direct link between achievement of specified performance goals and the incentive compensation of eligible GreenSky employees.
Typically, a participant's potential AIP award is determined by multiplying the participant's target award (as a percentage of the participant's annual salary) by the relevant AIP award multipliers (determined based upon the performance goals achieved for the performance period).
In the past, at the end of the performance period, the Compensation Committee would determine the extent to which the applicable performance goals were achieved or exceeded and the actual award payments to be made, although the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to determine amounts to be paid to individual participants that may be greater or less than the formula result.
For 2021, in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and pending merger, the Compensation Committee did not award cash incentives under the AIP. Instead, the Compensation Committee followed a discretionary approach to cash bonuses in 2021.
Discretionary Cash Bonuses
In evaluating 2021 performance and determining cash bonuses, the Compensation Committee considered operational outcomes during the pandemic, such as maintaining uninterrupted service to the GreenSky ecosystem, funding diversification, access to capital and liquidity, bank partner commitments, and credit quality.
The Compensation Committee evaluated the following individual contributions in determining the 2021 cash bonuses:
| | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Key Individual Achievements in 2021 |
| David Zalik | | •Provided executive leadership to the Company's product development and IT teams to define and prioritize the Company's detailed product development roadmap. •Collaborated closely with the Company's executive leadership team and outside regulatory counsel in responding to a multi-year CFPB inquiry, ultimately negotiating a satisfactory Settlement Agreement and Consent Order with the CFPB. •Collaborated closely with the Company's Board of Directors, Special Committee, M&A counsel, and investment bankers to evaluate, enhance and ultimately determine the preferred bid to acquire the Company, as provided by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. •Played a key role in planning for the pending operational and organizational integration of the Company with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Gerald Benjamin | | •Played a key role in preparing the Company's periodic CY 2021 Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA guidance as communicated to the street. •Collaborated closely with the Company's investment bankers to assemble and present updated periodic CY 2021 Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA outlooks to prospective bidders. •Collaborated closely with the Company's executive leadership team and outside regulatory counsel in responding to a multi-year CFPB inquiry, ultimately negotiating a satisfactory Settlement Agreement and Consent Order with the CFPB. •Collaborated closely with the Company's Chief Legal Counsel and outside M&A counsel in successfully negotiating a definitive merger agreement with The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Tim Kaliban | | •Directed and oversaw enhancements to GreenSky's risk policies, practices and products including credit, fraud, merchant underwriting and oversight, and transaction funding. •Collaborated closely with the Company's executive leadership team and outside regulatory counsel in responding to a multi-year CFPB inquiry, ultimately negotiating a satisfactory Settlement Agreement and Consent Order with the CFPB. •Led due diligence efforts for equity and capital markets transactions. |
| Andrew Kang | | •Led the financial planning and analysis function, enhanced financial forecasting and outperformed 2021 budget targets. •Executed the Company's funding diversification initiatives and established new forward-flow asset sale programs as well as new funding initiatives. •Led the investor relations strategy, improved equity analyst coverage, established street guidance and developed investor and shareholder relationships. •Oversaw departmental expense management processes, focusing on cost discipline and accountability, KPI development and reporting transparency. |
| Ritesh Gupta | | •Improved operating efficiencies and customer experience through call reduction, digital transformation with higher self-service, process re-engineering, functional re-organizations, talent upgrade and incentives redesign. •Stabilized the Operations' 100% remote work model with high employee productivity and morale coupled with innovative and flexible scheduling for customer needs. •Scaled Operational Risk Management Processes to reduce origination losses. |
Messrs. Zalik, Benjamin, Kaliban, Kang and Gupta received discretionary cash payouts based on the Compensation Committee's concurrence with the steady operational outcomes amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as well as extraordinary individual contributions of the NEOs during 2021.
The following table provides the actual discretionary cash payouts for 2021: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | Discretionary Cash Payment Awarded | |
| David Zalik | | $750,000 | |
| Gerald Benjamin | | $450,000 | |
| Tim Kaliban | | $450,000 | |
| Andrew Kang | | $325,000 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | | $200,000 | |
Long-Term Incentive Program
Our long-term incentive ("LTI") awards for 2021 were delivered in the form of restricted stock. Due to Mr. Zalik's equity ownership interest in GreenSky, he has elected not to receive an annual LTI award. We made these awards to provide increased retention value as we regard our NEOs and other recipients to be crucial to our ongoing growth and profitability and to provide market competitive pay.
The table below shows the 2021 equity grant guidelines for our NEOs, in terms of the target 2021 LTI award, the weighting and value allocated between shares of restricted stock and stock options and the number of shares underlying restricted stock and stock option awards. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restricted Stock | | Stock Options |
| Named Executive Officer | Target 2021 LTI Award | % | Value | | % | Value |
| David Zalik | $ | — | | — | $ | — | | | — | $ | — | |
| Gerald Benjamin | $ | 500,000 | | 66.7% | $ | 333,333 | | | 33.3% | $ | 166,667 | |
| Tim Kaliban | $ | 500,000 | | 66.7% | $ | 333,333 | | | 33.3% | $ | 166,667 | |
| Andrew Kang | $ | 650,000 | | 66.7% | $ | 433,333 | | | 33.3% | $ | 214,500 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | $ | 500,000 | | 66.7% | $ | 333,333 | | | 33.3% | $ | 166,667 | |
The actual LTI grants were made using the closing price of our Class A common stock of $7.24 on March 15, 2021, the date the Compensation Committee approved the equity grants for our executive officers. The following table shows the actual value of the grants made to each NEO and reflects the $7.24 per share grant price. Vesting occurs ratably over a four-year period. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Restricted Stock | | Stock Options | |
| Shares | Value | | Underlying Shares | Value | Actual 2021 LTI Award |
| David Zalik | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Gerald Benjamin | 69,064 | | $ | 500,023 | | | — | | $ | — | | $ | 500,023 | |
| Tim Kaliban | 117,404 | | $ | 850,005 | | | — | | $ | — | | $ | 850,005 | |
| Andrew Kang | 89,780 | | $ | 650,007 | | | — | | $ | — | | $ | 650,007 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | 69,064 | | $ | 500,023 | | | — | | $ | — | | $ | 500,023 | |
Our NEOs did not receive additional equity awards outside of the LTI awards granted in March 2021.
2022 Compensation Decisions
Our Compensation Committee has not yet made any final decisions regarding our executive
compensation program for 2022 for the NEOs.
Compensation Governance
In addition to structuring our compensation programs with objective, predetermined goals with direct oversight by our Compensation Committee, we employ several other features to enhance the governance of our compensation programs. For more information regarding our compensation governance applicable to all employees (including our NEOs), see Part III, Item 10 "Corporate Governance — Corporate Governance Policies." Below is a discussion of the Stock Ownership Guidelines applicable to our NEOs.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our Board has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines because it believes GreenSky's executive officers and non-employee directors should have a meaningful ownership stake in the company to further align their interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders and promote our commitment to sound corporate governance. Each executive officer is required to hold equity valued at a multiple of such person's annual salary in the applicable amount provided below: | | | | | | | | |
| Position | | Guideline |
| Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | | 6x salary |
| Other Executive Officers | | 3x salary |
Each executive officer has five years from becoming an executive officer to accumulate sufficient equity and achieve the ownership required by the Stock Ownership Guidelines. As of the Record Date, each of GreenSky's executive officers was in compliance with the requirements of the Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Compensation Committee Report
In connection with our oversight of the compensation programs of GreenSky, we, the members of the Compensation Committee listed below, have reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based upon such review and discussion, we have recommended to GreenSky's Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Form 10-K.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee:
Gregg Freishtat (Chairman)
Joel Babbit
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Year | Salary | Bonus (1) | Non-Equity Incentive Compensation (2) | Option Awards (3) | Stock Awards (3) | All Other Compensation (4) | Total |
David Zalik(5) | 2021 | $ | 500,000 | | $ | 750,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,019 | | $ | 1,252,019 | |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman | 2020 | $ | 500,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,365 | | $ | 502,365 | |
| 2019 | $ | 500,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 2,365 | | $ | 502,365 | |
Gerald Benjamin(5) | 2021 | $ | 450,000 | | $ | 450,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 500,023 | | $ | 671,760 | | $ | 2,071,783 | |
| Chief Administrative Officer and Vice Chairman | 2020 | $ | 450,000 | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 154,180 | | $ | 310,843 | | $ | 938,459 | | $ | 2,053,482 | |
| 2019 | $ | 450,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 858,312 | | $ | 1,671,509 | | $ | 1,329,548 | | $ | 4,309,369 | |
| Tim Kaliban | 2021 | $ | 400,000 | | $ | 450,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 850,005 | | $ | 149,010 | | $ | 1,849,015 | |
| President and Chief Risk Officer | 2020 | $ | 400,000 | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 154,180 | | $ | 310,843 | | $ | 338,402 | | $ | 1,403,425 | |
| 2019 | $ | 400,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 163,620 | | $ | 858,312 | | $ | 1,671,509 | | $ | 167,735 | | $ | 3,261,176 | |
| Andrew Kang | 2021 | $ | 650,000 | | $ | 325,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 650,007 | | $ | 10,150 | | $ | 1,635,157 | |
EVP and CFO(6) | 2020 | $ | 200,000 | | $ | 280,494 | | $ | — | | $ | 65,121 | | $ | 951,054 | | $ | 172,088 | | $ | 1,668,757 | |
| Ritesh Gupta EVP and COO | 2021 | $ | 400,000 | | $ | 200,000 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 500,023 | | $ | 10,150 | | $ | 1,110,173 | |
(1)The amounts shown represent discretionary bonuses paid to certain of our Named Executive Officers. Awards were paid in cash and restricted stock awards as follows:
(a)Discretionary Cash Bonuses
(i)2020: Benjamin ($200,000); Kaliban ($200,000); Kang ($60,494)
(ii)2021: Zalik ($750,000); Benjamin ($450,000); Kaliban ($450,000); Kang ($325,000); Gupta ($200,000)
(b)Discretionary New Hire Bonus
(i)2020: Kang ($220,000)
(2)The amounts shown represent non-discretionary cash bonuses paid to eligible GreenSky employees (which include our NEOs) under the AIP.
(3)The amounts shown were computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718. The assumptions that we used to calculate these amounts are discussed above in Part II, Item 8 Note 12 Share-Based Compensation.
(4)The compensation included in the "All Other Compensation" column includes:
(a)for Mr. Zalik, 401(k) matching contributions;
(b)for Mr. Benjamin, distributions in respect of GreenSky Holdings, LLC equity awards in the amounts of $671,760, $938,459 and $1,329,548 in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively;
(c)for Mr. Kaliban, (i) distributions in respect of GreenSky Holdings, LLC equity awards in the amounts of $139,890, $329,127 and $158,460 in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively, and (ii) 401(k) matching contributions in the amount of $10,150 in 2021 and $9,275 in each of 2020 and 2019;
(d)for Mr. Kang, in 2021, 401(k) matching contributions in the amount of $10,150; in 2020, (i) 401(k) matching contributions in the amount of $1,750, (ii) transportation costs of $20,338 in connection with Mr. Kang commuting to our principal executive offices in Atlanta, Georgia (which transportation cost also includes a tax gross-up of $7,913), and (iii) reimbursement of relocation expenses of $150,000; and
(e)for Mr. Gupta, 401(k) matching contributions in the amount of $10,150.
(5)Messrs. Zalik and Benjamin also serve on our Board but do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors.
(6)Reflects the salary Mr. Kang earned since September 14, 2020, the date of his hire.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2021
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards made to our Named Executive Officers during 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
| Name | Grant Date (1) | Number of Securities Underlying Restricted Stock Awards
(#) | Number of Securities Underlying Options
(#) | Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards
($/Sh) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($) (2) |
| David Zalik | — | | — | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| Gerald Benjamin | 3/15/2021 | 69,064(3) | — | | $ | 7.24 | | $ | 500,023 | |
| Tim Kaliban | 3/15/2021 | 117,404(3) | — | | $ | 7.24 | | $ | 850,005 | |
| Andrew Kang | 3/15/2021 | 89,780(3) | — | | $ | 7.24 | | $ | 650,007 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | 3/15/2021 | 69,064(3) | — | | $ | 7.24 | | $ | 500,023 | |
(1)All awards granted in 2021 vest at a rate of 25% per year on the anniversary of the date of grant.
(2)The amounts shown were computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions that we used to calculate these amounts are discussed above in Part II, Item 8. Note 12 Share-Based Compensation.
(3)Awards granted on March 15, 2021 as part of the Long-Term Incentive Program and which vest ratably over four years.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2021 Fiscal Year-End
The following table presents information regarding outstanding equity awards, as of December 31, 2021, for each Named Executive Officer: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards (1) | | Stock Awards (2) |
| Name | Grant Date | Number of securities underlying unexercised options exercisable
(#) | Number of securities underlying unexercised options unexercisable
(#) | Option exercise price
($/Sh) | Option expiration date | | Number of shares or units that have not vested
(#) | Market value of shares or units that have not vested
($) |
| David Zalik | | | | | | | | |
| — | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | — | | $ | — | |
| Gerald Benjamin | | | | | | | | |
| 2016 Incentive | 8/22/2016 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | — | | $ | — | |
| 2018 Incentive | 3/1/2018 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 105,000(3) | $ | 1,192,800 | |
| 2018 Bonus | 3/7/2019 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 23,904(4) | $ | 271,553 | |
| 2019 Incentive | 3/7/2019 | 113,637 | | 113,638(5) | $ | 12.55 | | 3/7/2029 | | 66,594(5) | $ | 756,508 | |
| 2020 Incentive | 5/14/2020 | 22,367 | | 67,101(6) | $ | 3.73 | | 5/14/2030 | | 62,502(6) | $ | 710,023 | |
| 2021 Incentive | 3/15/2021 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 69,064(7) | $ | 784,567 | |
| Tim Kaliban | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 Bonus | 3/7/2019 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 6,872(4) | $ | 78,070 | |
| 2019 Incentive | 3/7/2019 | 113,637 | | 113,638(5) | $ | 12.55 | | 3/7/2029 | | 66,594(5) | $ | 756,508 | |
| 2020 Incentive | 5/14/2020 | 22,367 | | 67,101(6) | $ | 3.73 | | 5/14/2030 | | 62,502(6) | $ | 710,023 | |
| 2021 Incentive | 3/15/2021 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 117,404(7) | $ | 1,333,709 | |
| Andrew Kang | | | | | | | | |
| 2020 New Hire | 9/24/2020 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 150,000(8) | $ | 1,704,000 | |
| 2020 Incentive | 9/24/2020 | 8,547 | | 25,641(8) | $ | 4.11 | | 9/24/2030 | | 23,550(8) | $ | 267,528 | |
| 2021 Incentive | 3/15/2021 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 89,780(7) | $ | 1,019,901 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | | | | | | | | |
| 2018 New Hire | 11/15/2018 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 9,665(9) | $ | 109,794 | |
| 2018 Bonus | 3/7/2019 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 919(4) | $ | 10,444 | |
| 2019 Incentive | 3/7/2019 | 28,409 | | 28,410(5) | $ | 12.55 | | 3/7/2029 | | 16,649(5) | $ | 189,127 | |
| 2019 Special | 9/6/2019 | 28,409 | | 28,410(10) | $ | 6.83 | | 9/6/2029 | | 7,321(10) | $ | 83,167 | |
| 2020 Incentive | 5/14/2020 | 44,734 | | 134,202(6) | $ | 3.73 | | 5/14/2030 | | 125,001(6) | $ | 1,420,011 | |
| 2021 Incentive | 3/15/2021 | — | | — | | $ | — | | — | | 69,064(7) | $ | 784,567 | |
(1)Represents options to acquire shares of GreenSky's Class A common stock.
(2)The market value is based on the $11.36 closing price of GreenSky’s Class A common stock on December 31, 2021.
(3)The amount shown represents the number of common membership interests of GreenSky Holdings, LLC (and an equal number of shares of GreenSky’s Class B common stock) that are unvested. The award vests ratably over five years.
(4)Amounts shown represent equity granted on March 7, 2019, in connection with a discretionary bonus payment for service in the prior fiscal year (2018) and which vest ratably over three years.
(5)Awards granted on March 7, 2019 as part of the Long-Term Incentive Program and which vest ratably over four years.
(6)Awards granted on May 14, 2020 as part of the Long-Term Incentive Program and which vest ratably over four years.
(7)Awards granted on March 15, 2021 as part of the Long-Term Incentive Program and which vest ratably over four years.
(8)Awards granted in connection with Mr. Kang's hire in 2020 and which vest ratably over four years. Of these awards, 200,000 shares of restricted stock served as an inducement grant. The remaining restricted stock and the option award were provided as the pro rata portion of the Long-Term Incentive Program.
(9)Awards granted on November 15, 2018 in connection with Mr. Gupta's hire in 2018 and which vest ratably over four years.
(10)Awards granted on September 6, 2019 to Mr. Gupta in connection with a strategic compensation review for specific roles conducted by GreenSky in August 2019 and vest ratably over four years.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2021
The following table sets forth the number of shares of Class A common stock acquired during 2021 by our Named Executive Officers upon exercise of stock options or upon vesting of restricted stock, as well as the value realized in connection with such equity award transactions. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards(1) | | Stock Awards(2) |
| Name | | Number of shares acquired on exercise
(#) | | Value realized on exercise
($) | | Number of shares acquired on vesting
(#) | | Value realized on vesting
($) |
| David Zalik | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Gerald Benjamin | | — | | | $ | — | | | 53,988 | | | $ | 323,632 | |
| Tim Kaliban | | — | | | $ | — | | | 42,015 | | | $ | 250,956 | |
| Andrew Kang | | — | | | $ | — | | | 40,581 | | | $ | 373,788 | |
| Ritesh Gupta | | — | | | $ | — | | | 44,442 | | | $ | 306,378 | |
(1)No option awards were exercised in 2021.
(2)The amounts shown for number of shares acquired upon vesting, and the value realized, are net of the impact of shares withheld for payment of required federal, state and payroll taxes.
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information contained under the caption "Executivecaptions "Interests of GreenSky's Directors and Director Compensation"Executive Officers in the Mergers" and "Holdback Agreement" in our definitive Proxy Statement with respect to our Proposed Merger filed on November 9, 2021.
Mr. Ritesh Gupta, GreenSky's Chief Operating Officer, became a named executive officer subsequent to the Proxy Statement referenced above. Mr. Gupta's potential payments upon termination or a change in control are similar to the payments for all other named executive officers, excluding Mr. David Zalik, GreenSky's Chief Executive Officer.
Pension Benefits
Our NEOs did not participate in, or otherwise receive any benefits under, any pension or retirement plan (other than our 401(k) plan) sponsored by us during 2021.
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation
Our NEOs did not participate in, or earn any benefits under, a non-qualified deferred compensation plan sponsored by us during 2021.
Employment Agreements
We entered into an employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with David Zalikin 2014. The material terms of the Employment Agreement are summarized below. None of our other NEOs has an employment agreement, and none of our executive officers is a party to any stand-alone severance or change of control agreement.
The Employment Agreement provides for an annual salary of $500,000, subject to periodic reviews, and an annual cash incentive based upon a target percentage of 50% of the annual salary. In 2021, Mr. Zalik received a cash incentive of $750,000. In 2020 and 2019, Mr. Zalik waived any entitlement to an annual incentive. The Employment Agreement also contains a 12-month non-competition covenant and provides for certain severance benefits, which benefits have been waived by Mr. Zalik.
Employee Benefit Plans
GreenSky Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan
In January 2009, GreenSky LLC ("GSLLC") adopted the GSLLC Equity Incentive Plan (the "2009 Plan"). GSLLC amended and restated the 2009 Plan in July 2015 (the "2015 Plan"). In August 2017, GreenSky Holdings, LLC ("GS Holdings") became the holder of 100% of the outstanding economic interests in GSLLC and GSLLC became wholly owned by GS Holdings. These transactions collectively are referred to as the "2017 Reorganization." In connection with the 2017 Reorganization, (i) outstanding options to acquire Class A units in GSLLC were equitably adjusted and converted into options to acquire Class A units in GS Holdings and (ii) outstanding profits interests in GSLLC were equitably adjusted through an automatic exchange so that they were converted into profits interests in GS Holdings having the same general terms and conditions as the surrendered profits interests in GSLLC. In connection with the 2017 Reorganization, GS Holdings assumed the 2015 Plan and amended and restated such plan so that it became the GreenSky Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the "GS Holdings Plan."
Immediately prior to our IPO, (i) the operating agreement of GS Holdings was amended and restated to, among other things, modify its capital structure by replacing the different classes of membership interests and profits interests with a single class of equity interest titled common membership interests, which we refer to as the "Holdco Units"; (ii) GreenSky issued to each of the continuing GS Holdings members a number of shares of GreenSky's Class B common stock equal to the number of Holdco Units held by it (other than the Holdco Units that were exchanged in connection with the IPO), for consideration in the amount of $0.001 per share of GreenSky's Class B common stock; (iii) certain Holdco Units were contributed to GreenSky in exchange for shares of GreenSky's Class A common stock; (iv) options to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings outstanding under the GS Holdings Plan were equitably adjusted to be exercisable for shares of GreenSky's Class A common stock; (v) certain profits interests outstanding under the GS Holdings Plan were converted into shares of GreenSky's Class A common stock, subject to the existing vesting requirements; (vi) certain profits interests outstanding under the GS Holdings Plan were converted into Holdco Units, subject to the existing vesting requirements; and (vii) outstanding warrants to acquire Class A units of GS Holdings were equitably adjusted pursuant to their terms so that they are exercisable for Holdco Units (and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock).
We do not expect to grant additional awards under the GS Holdings Plan in the future. To the extent not already vested, the Holdco Units issued with respect to profits interests generally will continue to vest ratably over the original vesting periods of the profits interests (generally five years), provided that the employee remains continuously employed by GreenSky. In addition, provided that the employee remains continuously employed by GreenSky, the Holdco Units will vest in their entirety upon a "sale of the business," which includes, in general and subject to certain exceptions, (i) any reorganization, merger or consolidation into an independent third party, any acquisition by independent third parties of 50% or more of our Class A common stock on an as converted basis, or (ii) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of GreenSky to an independent third party.
GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan
In connection with our IPO, we adopted the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, which we refer to as the 2018 Plan. The 2018 Plan covers the grant of awards to employees, consultants and non-employee directors of GreenSky and those of its affiliates, except that incentive stock options only may be granted to employees of GreenSky, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Under the terms of the 2018 Plan, an aggregate of 24,000,000 shares of the Class A common stock of GreenSky, Inc. have been authorized for delivery in settlement of awards.
The 2018 Plan permits the grant of any or all of the following types of awards to grantees:
•stock options, including incentive stock options;
•stock appreciation rights;
•restricted stock;
•deferred stock and restricted stock units;
•performance units and performance shares;
•dividend equivalents;
•bonus shares;
•other stock-based awards; and
•cash incentive awards.
GreenSky, Inc. Annual Meeting.Incentive Plan
In January 2019, our Compensation Committee adopted the GreenSky, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan. The Annual Incentive Plan is designed to reward employees if specified performance goals are achieved, so as to encourage the creation of stockholder value by establishing a direct link between achievement of specified performance goals and the incentive compensation of eligible GreenSky employees.
Designated employees of GreenSky and its affiliates are eligible to earn annual incentives, generally paid in cash, based on the attainment of pre-established performance goals during the applicable performance period. The Compensation Committee, as the administrator of the Annual Incentive Plan, has the discretion to select the employees who are eligible to participate in the Annual Incentive Plan, establish the performance goals upon which incentives may be based and the target and other amounts that may become payable if the applicable performance goals are achieved. Performance goals may be based upon business criteria relating to GreenSky and its affiliates, the individual participants, teams or other business units, or a combination thereof. A participant's potential incentive award will be determined by a formula, by multiplying the participant's target incentive (as a percentage of the participant's annual salary) by the relevant incentive multipliers (determined based upon the performance goals achieved for the performance period). At the end of each performance period, the Compensation Committee determines the extent to which the applicable performance goals were achieved or exceeded and the actual award payments to be made, although the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to determine amounts to be paid to individual participants that may be greater or less than the formula result.
Other Supplemental Benefits
Our NEOs are eligible for the following benefits on a similar basis as other eligible employees:
•health, dental and vision insurance;
•paid-time-off days;
•life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance;
•short-term (voluntary) and long-term disability insurance;
•health savings account programs;
•critical, accident and life insurance (voluntary); and
•401(k) plan, which generally allows employees who satisfy certain eligibility requirements to defer up to 75% of their compensation, within limits established by Internal Revenue Service regulations, with GreenSky having the ability to make matching contributions up to 6% of base compensation.
2021 Director Compensation
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to all persons who served as directors during all or part of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name(1) | | Fees earned or paid in cash
($) | | Stock Awards ($)(2) | | Option
Awards
($) | | All Other Compensation ($)(3) | | Total
($) |
| Joel Babbit | | $ | 69,000 | | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 28,993 | | | $ | 297,993 | |
| Arthur Bacci | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 290,000 | |
| Gregg Freishtat | | $ | 72,500 | | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,630 | | | $ | 290,130 | |
| Robert Sheft | | $ | 60,000 | | | $ | 200,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 260,000 | |
(1)Messrs. Zalik and Benjamin serve both as executive officers and directors of GreenSky. Their compensation is fully reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above, and they do not receive any additional compensation for their service as directors.
(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of each stock award, which was computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value was determined by reference to the closing price of the Class A common stock on the grant date. For additional information, see Part II, Item 8 Note 12 Share-Based Compensation.
(3)The compensation included in the “All Other Compensation” column includes distributions in respect of GS Holdings equity awards for Messrs. Babbit and Freishtat.
| | | | | | | | |
| We provide the following compensation to our non-employee directors: |
| Compensation Component | | Amount |
| Annual Cash Retainer | | $60,000 |
| Annual Equity Award | | $200,000 in shares of restricted Class A common stock, vesting in full on the one year anniversary of the date of grant |
| Additional Cash Retainer for Audit Committee Chair | | $15,000 |
| Additional Cash Retainer for Compliance Committee Chair | | $15,000 |
| Additional Cash Retainer for Compensation Committee Chair | | $12,500 |
| Additional Cash Retainer for Governance and Nominating Committee Chair | | $9,000 |
| Board Meeting Fees | | None |
We also reimburse all directors for travel and other necessary business expenses incurred in the performance of director services and extend coverage to them under our directors' and officers' indemnity insurance policy.
Each director has five years from becoming a director to accumulate sufficient equity and achieve the ownership required by the Stock Ownership Guidelines, which is five times the director's annual cash retainer. As of the Record Date, each of GreenSky's directors was in compliance with the requirements of the Stock Ownership Guidelines.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2021, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Freishtat and Babbit. None of the members of the Compensation Committee was a current or former officer or employee of GreenSky or any of its subsidiaries. Gerald Benjamin, our Chief Administrative Officer and Vice Chairman, serves on the board of directors of NCG. Joel Babbit, one of our directors, serves as Chief Executive Officer of NCG. Since Mr. Babbit has served on GreenSky's Board, Mr. Benjamin has not participated in any decisions regarding Mr. Babbit's compensation as an officer of NCG. Except as described above, there were no Compensation Committee interlocks or insider participation in compensation decisions that are required to be disclosed in this Proxy Statement. None of the members of the Compensation Committee had any relationship requiring disclosure under "Related Party Transactions." See our discussion on compensation policies and practices as related to risk management in Part III, Item 11 Executive Compensation — Corporate Governance Policies — Risk Management.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Zalik, our Chief Executive Officer, and the annual total compensation of our median employee.
| | | | | |
| Chief Executive Officer Total Annual Compensation | $ | 1,252,019 | |
| Median Employee Total Annual Compensation | $ | 72,078 | |
| Ratio of Chief Executive Officer to Median Employee Total Annual Compensation | 17 : 1 |
To determine the median employee compensation, we analyzed all of GreenSky’s employees, excluding GreenSky’s Chief Executive Officer, as of December 31, 2021. We annualized wages and salaries for full-time or part-time employees who were not employed for the full year. We used base salary, actual bonus, and the fair value at grant date of equity compensation as the consistently applied compensation metric to determine the median employee. After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for the median employee according to the methodology used to report the annual compensation of our Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We maintain the 2018 Plan, pursuant to the information containedwhich we may grant awards of (i) incentive and nonqualified stock options; (ii) stock appreciation rights; (iii) restricted stock; (iv) restricted stock units; and (v) other stock or cash-based incentive awards. Outstanding awards under the captions "SecurityGS Holdings Plan continue to be governed by the terms of such plan until exercised, expired or otherwise terminated or canceled. We do not currently expect to grant any new awards under the GS Holdings Plan. For additional information regarding the 2018 Plan and the GS Holdings Plan, see Part III, Item 11 Executive Compensation — Employee Benefit Plans.
The following table provides information about option awards under the 2018 Plan and the GS Holdings Plan as of December 31, 2021.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan Category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options(1) | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected
in first column) |
| Equity compensation plans previously approved by security holders | | 2,055,423 | | | $ | 9.94 | | | 14,524,957 | |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | 547,615(2) | | $ | 10.27 | | | ___(3) |
| Total | | 2,603,038 | | | $ | 10.01 | | | 14,524,957 | |
(1)Does not include outstanding shares of previously-awarded restricted stock. Further, certain options included in this table were capped at $7.60 per share, such that, depending on prevailing market conditions, the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options might be less than the total shown in this table.
(2)Represents options issued under the GS Holdings Plan. For more information, see Part III, Item 11 "Executive Compensation — Employee Benefit Plans — GreenSky Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan."
(3)Does not include 3,505,681 Holdco Units remaining available under the GS Holdings Plan. We do not currently expect to grant additional awards under the GS Holdings Plan in the future.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management"Management
Beneficial Ownership Table
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our Class A common stock and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in our definitive Proxy StatementClass B common stock as of March 1, 2022, the Record Date. The information is provided with respect to (i) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our 2019 Annual Meeting.
Class A common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our NEOs, and (iv) all of our directors and NEOs, as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, which deem a person to beneficially own any shares of our Class A common stock the person has or shares voting or dispositive power over and any additional shares obtainable within 60 days through the exercise of options, warrants or other purchase rights. Shares of our Class A common stock subject to options, warrants or other rights to purchase that are currently exercisable or are exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding such options, warrants or other rights, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, each person possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares identified as beneficially owned. An asterisk indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of our Class A common stock, our Class B common stock or our combined voting power, as applicable.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Shares Beneficially Owned |
| | Class A Common Stock(1)(2) | | Class B Common Stock(1)(2) | | Combined
Voting Power |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Number | | Percentage | | Number | | Percentage | |
| 5% Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | |
David Zalik(3)(4) | | 1,105,220 | | | * | | 47,878,252 | | | 90.4 | % | | 72.6 | % |
Robert Sheft(3)(5) | | 23,756,076 | | | 18.1 | % | | * | | * | | 3.6 | % |
The Community Foundation Charitable Real Estate Fund(6) | | 9,917,912 | | | 7.6 | % | | * | | * | | 1.5 | % |
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta(7) | | 6,635,735 | | | 5.1 | % | | * | | * | | 1.0 | % |
| Named Executive Officers and Directors (other than those listed above) | | | | | | | | | | |
Joel Babbit(3)(8) | | 33,614 | | | * | | 199,530 | | | * | | * |
Arthur Bacci(3)(9) | | 96,538 | | | * | | * | | * | | * |
Gerald Benjamin(3)(10) | | 789,628 | | | * | | 1,237,563 | | | 2.3 | % | | 2.0 | % |
Gregg Freishtat(3)(11) | | 76,272 | | | * | | * | | * | | * |
Tim Kaliban(3)(12) | | 1,810,610 | | | 1.4 | % | | 1,073,530 | | | 2.0 | % | | 1.9 | % |
Andrew Kang(3)(13) | | 312,458 | | | * | | * | | * | | * |
Ritesh Gupta(3)(14) | | 411,347 | | | * | | * | | * | | * |
| Totals for Executive Officers and Directors as a group (8 persons) | | 4,635,687 | | | 3.5 | % | | 50,388,875 | | | 95.2 | % | | 77.0 | % |
(1)Our Class A common stock entitles holders thereof to one vote per share, and our Class B common stock entitles holders thereof to ten votes per share, voting together as a single class.
(2)Subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, Holdco Units are exchangeable (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustment for certain subdivisions (stock splits), combinations or purchases of Class A common stock or Holdco Units, or for cash (based on the market price of the shares of Class A common stock), at our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our Board). See “Related Party Transactions—IPO and Related Transactions—Exchange Agreement.” Beneficial ownership of Holdco Units is not reflected in this table; however, information concerning ownership of Holdco Units is included in the footnotes below, where applicable. Under the Class A common stock columns, the numbers and percentages exclude shares of Class A common stock that may be acquired upon the exchange of Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock.
(3)The address of the beneficial owner is c/o GreenSky, Inc., 5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 700, Atlanta, Georgia 30342.
(4)Mr. Zalik beneficially owns (i) 39,716,670 Holdco Units and shares of GreenSky Class B common stock held by Founders Technology Investors, LLC; (ii) 8,161,582 Holdco Units and shares of GreenSky Class B common stock held by Financial Technology Investors, LLC. Mr. Zalik is the sole manager of each of Founders Technology Investors, LLC and Financial Technology Investors, LLC.
(5)Mr. Sheft beneficially owns (i) 22,063,630 shares of Class A common stock held by RS 2012 NV Trust ("RS Trust"), (ii) 1,105,220 shares of Class A common stock held by Robert Sheft Dynasty Trust ("Dynasty Trust"), and (iii) 587,226 shares of Class A
common stock held directly. Mr. Sheft’s wife and brother are the members of RS Management Advisors, LLC, which is the Trustee of the Robert Sheft 2012 Trust and the Robert Sheft Dynasty Trust. Those trusts together own 99%, and Mr. Sheft owns 1%, of GS Investment Holdings, LLC. As such, Mr. Sheft has shared investment power over these shares.
(6)Based on a Schedule 13G filed by The Community Foundation Charitable Real Estate Fund with the SEC on February 3, 2022. The address of the beneficial owner is 4950 Murphy Canyon Road, San Diego, California 92123.
(7)Based on a Schedule 13G filed by the Jewish Federation of Atlanta with the SEC on January 26, 2022. The address of the beneficial owner is 1440 Spring Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30309.
(8)Includes (i) 199,530 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock; (ii) 33,614 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Babbit has sole voting but no investment power.
(9)Includes 33,614 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Bacci has sole voting but no investment power.
(10)Includes (i) 978,934 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock (including 105,000 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock over which Mr. Benjamin has sole voting but no investment power); (ii) 258,629 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock held by Benjamin Equity Investments, LLC ; (iii) 222,064 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Benjamin has sole voting but no investment power; (iv) stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 192,823 shares of Class A common stock; and (v) 300,000 shares of Class A common stock held by a foundation, over which Mr. Benjamin has shared investment power.
(11)Includes 33,614 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Freishtat has sole voting but no investment power.
(12)Includes (i) 956,983 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock; (ii) 116,547 Holdco Units and shares of Class B common stock held by Kaliban 2014, LLC; (iii) 253,372 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Kaliban has sole voting but no investment power; and (iv) stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 192,823 shares of Class A common stock. Mr. Kaliban is the sole manager of Kaliban 2014, LLC.
(13)Includes (i) 263,330 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Kang has sole voting but no investment power and (ii) stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 8,547 shares of Class A common stock.
(14)Includes (i) 228,619 shares of restricted Class A common stock over which Mr. Gupta has sole voting but no investment power; and (ii) stock options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of the Record Date to purchase 115,757 shares of Class A common stock.
Change in Control
Other than our proposed merger with Goldman Sachs, there are no arrangements, known to GreenSky, including any pledge by any person of securities of GreenSky or any of its parents, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of GreenSky. For more information regarding our proposed merger with Goldman Sachs, see Part I, Item 1 under "Pending Merger."
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Related Party Transactions
Transactions with Related Persons
The information requiredfollowing includes a summary of transactions since January 1, 2021 to which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or, to our knowledge, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
IPO and Related Transactions
In connection with our IPO, we consummated the following transactions with related persons.
Operating Agreement of GS Holdings. GreenSky, Inc. holds a significant equity interest in GS Holdings and is the managing member of GS Holdings. Accordingly, GreenSky, Inc. operates and controls all of the business and affairs of GS Holdings and, through GS Holdings and its operating entity subsidiaries, conducts our business.
In connection with our IPO, the operating agreement of GS Holdings was amended and restated (referred to as the GS Holdings LLC Agreement) to, among other things, modify its capital structure by this item is incorporatedreplacing the different classes of membership interests and profits interests with a single new class of membership interests of GS Holdings (referred to as Holdco Units). GS Holdings and GreenSky, Inc. entered into the GS Holdings LLC Agreement with the parties who received Holdco Units in connection with the reorganization transactions (including Joel Babbit, Gerald Benjamin, Gregg Freishtat, Tim Kaliban, Dennis Kelly and David Zalik), which we refer to as "Continuing LLC Members."
Under the GS Holdings LLC Agreement, GreenSky, Inc., as the managing member of GS Holdings, has the right to determine when distributions (other than tax distributions) will be made to holders of Holdco Units in GS Holdings and the amount of any such distributions, subject to limitations imposed by referenceapplicable law and contractual restrictions (including pursuant to the information contained under the captions "Related Party Transactions" and "Corporate Governance" in our definitive Proxy Statementcredit agreements). If a distribution with respect to Holdco Units is authorized, such distribution will be made to the holders of Holdco Units pro rata based on their holdings of Holdco Units in accordance with their terms. In turn, GS Holdings, which is the managing member of GSLLC, has the right to determine when distributions (other than tax distributions) will be made by GSLLC to GS Holdings and the amount of any such distributions.
Under the terms of the GS Holdings LLC Agreement, all of the Holdco Units are subject to restrictions on disposition.
The holders of Holdco Units in GS Holdings, including GreenSky, Inc., will incur United States federal, state and local income taxes on their respective share of any taxable income of GS Holdings. Net profits and net losses of GS Holdings generally will be allocated to the holders of Holdco Units in GS Holdings (including GreenSky, Inc.) pro rata in accordance with their respective share of the net profits and net losses of GS Holdings. The GS Holdings LLC Agreement provides for cash distributions, which we refer to as "tax distributions," based on certain assumptions, to the holders of Holdco Units in GS Holdings (including GreenSky, Inc.) pro rata based on their Holdco Units in GS Holdings. Generally, these tax distributions to holders of Holdco Units in GS Holdings will be an amount equal to our 2019 Annual Meeting.estimate of the taxable income of GS Holdings, net of taxable losses, allocable per Holdco Unit in GS Holdings multiplied by an assumed tax rate set forth in the GS Holdings LLC Agreement. Any distributions will be subject to available cash and applicable legal and contractual restrictions.
Exchange Agreement. In connection with our IPO, the Continuing LLC Members, GS Holdings and GreenSky, Inc. entered into the Exchange Agreement under which the Continuing LLC Members (or certain permitted transferees thereof), and any other Exchange Agreement parties will have the right, subject to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, to exchange their Holdco Units (with automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of our Class B common stock) for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for certain stock subdivisions (stock splits), combinations, or purchases of our Class A common stock or Holdco Units, or for cash (based on the market price of the shares of our Class A common stock), at our option (such determination to be made by the disinterested members of our Board). As an Exchange Agreement party exchanges
Holdco Units for shares of our Class A common stock or cash, at our option, the number of Holdco Units held by GreenSky, Inc. correspondingly increases as we acquire the exchanged Holdco Units, and a corresponding number of shares of our Class B common stock are cancelled.
Registration Rights Agreement. In connection with our IPO, we entered into a registration rights agreement whereby we may be required to register under the Securities Act the sale of shares of our Class A common stock (i) issuable to certain of the Continuing LLC Members upon exchange of Holdco Units (and automatic cancellation of shares of our Class B common stock) and (ii) issued to certain pre-IPO equity holders in connection with the reorganization transactions. The registration rights agreement also requires us to make available and keep effective shelf registration statements permitting sales of shares into the market from time to time over an extended period. In addition, certain of those stockholders have the ability to exercise certain demand registration rights and/or piggyback registration rights in connection with underwritten registered offerings requested by any of such holders or initiated by us.
Tax Receivable Agreement. Refer to Part II, Item 7 Borrowings — Tax Receivable Agreement and Part II, Item 8 Note 13 Income Taxes — Tax Receivable Agreement for an overview of and additional information regarding our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the Tax Receivable Agreement is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors. The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:
•the timing of any subsequent exchanges of Holdco Units—for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable or amortizable assets of GS Holdings at the time of each exchange;
•the price of shares of our Class A common stock at or around the time of the exchange—the increase in any tax deductions, as well as the tax basis increase in other assets, of GS Holdings is affected by the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange;
•the extent to which such exchanges are taxable—if an exchange is not taxable for any reason, increased deductions will not be available;
•the amount and timing of our income—GreenSky, Inc. generally will be required to pay 85% of the deemed benefits as and when deemed realized; and
•the allocation of basis increases among the assets of GS Holdings and certain tax elections affecting depreciation.
Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement, we expect that the tax savings associated with the purchase of Holdco Units from the exchanging members in connection with our IPO and future exchanges of Holdco Units (assuming such future exchanges occurred at December 31, 2021 and assuming automatic cancellation of an equal number of shares of Class B common stock) would aggregate to approximately $728.5 million based on the closing price on December 31, 2021 of $11.36per share of our Class A common stock. Under such scenario, assuming future payments are made on the date each relevant tax return is due, without extensions, we would be required to pay approximately 85% of such amount, or $614.5million to the other parties to the Tax Receivable Agreement.
Additionally, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that (1) in the event that we materially breach any of our material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, whether as a result of failure to make any payment, failure to honor any other material obligation required thereunder or by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the agreements in a bankruptcy or otherwise, or (2) if, at any time, we elect an early termination of the agreement our obligations under the agreements (with respect to all Holdco Units, whether or not such units have been exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would accelerate and become payable in accordance with the Tax Receivable Agreement. In these situations, our obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity. If we had elected to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement as of December 31, 2021, based on the closing price on December 31, 2021 of our Class A common stock, and a discount
rate equal to 4.89% per annum, compounded annually, we estimate that we would have been required to pay $426.4 million in the aggregate under the Tax Receivable Agreement.
As a condition to the Merger Agreement, the Company and certain beneficiaries party to the TRA were required to enter into an amendment to the TRA (the "TRA Amendment"), which TRA Amendment provided that no payments under the TRA will be made following or as a result of the consummation of the Mergers.
Other Related Party Transactions. We lease approximately 82,400 square feet of office space located at 1797 NE Expressway, Atlanta, Georgia from a company owned by David Zalik, our Chief Executive Officer. As of the Record Date, the base rental rate was $23.52 per square foot, subject to annual increases of 3% at the beginning of each new lease year. The current lease term expires on April 30, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our total rent expense for such lease was approximately $1.7 million.
Mr. Robert Sheft, a former GreenSky director and beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Class A common stock, is the owner, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a company that is a merchant in the GreenSky program. For the period from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021, this company had approximately $8.1 million in transaction volume funded through the GreenSky program.
Indemnification Agreements. We are a party to indemnification agreements with, among others, each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
Under Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, our Audit Committee (or another independent body of our Board) is required to conduct an appropriate review of all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis. In accordance with our Audit Committee's charter, the Audit Committee must review and oversee all related party transactions. For these purposes, a "related party transaction" refers to all transactions for which review or oversight is required by applicable law or Nasdaq rules or that are required to be disclosed in the notes to GreenSky's financial statements or in GreenSky's SEC filings.
In addition, all of our employees, officers and directors are required to comply with the Code of Ethics. The Code of Ethics addresses, among other things, what actions are required when potential conflicts of interest may arise, including those from related party transactions. Specifically, if an employee, officer or director believes a conflict of interest exists or may arise, he or she is required to disclose promptly the existence of the conflict, or potential conflict, to GreenSky's Chief Legal Officer, General Counsel or Audit Committee Chair, who will evaluate the conflict and take the appropriate action, if any, to ensure that our interests are protected.
Since January 1, 2021, there have been no transactions that were required to be reported under "—Transactions with Related Persons" where the procedures described above did not require review, approval or ratification or where these procedures were not followed.
Director Independence
For information on the independence of our directors, see Part III, Item 10 "Corporate Governance — Committees and Meetings of the Board".
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Auditor Fees
The information requiredAudit Committee selected PricewaterhouseCoopers ("PwC") to serve as GreenSky's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. We first engaged PwC in 2014, and PwC has served as our principal accounting firm since that date.
Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by this item is incorporatedPwC for professional services rendered for the audits of our annual consolidated financial statements, and the reviews of the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, totaled $2.2 millionfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and $2.2 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed by referencePwC related to assurance and similar services totaled $109,000for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and $43,500 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. These fees were principally related to the information contained underaudit of GreenSky's 401(k) plan and services performed in connection with GreenSky's review of strategic alternatives.
Tax Fees. There were no tax fees billed by PwC for the caption "Auditor Fees"fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
All Other Fees. All Other Fees consist of any fees and expenses for professional services not included in our definitive Proxy Statementone of the other categories. All Other Fees totaled $7,900 and $3,600, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, and relate to the annual license renewal for PwC's accounting research software and disclosure checklists.
All audit-related services, tax services and other non-audit services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by PwC was compatible with the maintenance of that firm's independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. The Audit Committee's outside auditor independence policy provides for pre-approval of audit, audit-related and tax services specifically described by the Audit Committee on an annual basis and, in addition, individual engagements anticipated to exceed pre-established thresholds must be separately approved. The policy authorizes the Audit Committee to delegate to one or more of its members pre-approval authority with respect to our 2019 Annual Meeting.permitted services.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of GreenSky, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and the Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statement schedules are included in this Form 10-K:
•Schedule II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts is presented for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172021, 2020 and 2016.
2019.All remaining schedules are omitted and are not applicable or not required, or the required information is presented in the financial statements or notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File Number | Date of Filing | Exhibit Number Reference |
| Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 14, 2021, by and among The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Goldman Sachs Bank USA, GreenSky, Inc. and GreenSky Holdings, LLC | 8-K | 001-38506 | September 15, 2021 | 2.1 |
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GreenSky, Inc. | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 3.1 |
| Amended and Restated Bylaws of GreenSky, Inc. (Effective as of January 31, 2019) | 8-K | 001-38506 | February 6, 2019 | 3.1 |
| Description of Class A Common Stock of GreenSky, Inc. | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 2, 2020 | 4.1 |
| Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 4.1 |
| GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.1(a) |
| Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.1(b) |
| Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.1(c) |
| Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.1(d) |
| GreenSky Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.23 |
| GreenSky, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan | 8-K | 001-38506 | February 6, 2019 | 10.1 |
| GreenSky, Inc. Executive Severance Plan | 8-K | 001-38506 | April 4, 2019 | 10.1 |
| Non-Employee Director Compensation Package | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.1 |
| Employment Agreement, dated September 25, 2014, with David Zalik | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.4 |
| Offer Letter, dated January 2, 2012, for Timothy D. Kaliban | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.5 |
| Offer Letter, dated August 2, 2020, between GreenSky, Inc. and Andrew Kang | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2020 | 10.1 |
| Separation Agreement and General Release, dated February 26, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and Kevin Goldstein | 10-Q | 001-38506 | May 5, 2021 | 10.1 |
| Form of Indemnification Agreement for each of GreenSky Inc.’s directors and executive officers | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.7 |
| Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of GreenSky Holdings, LLC, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.3 |
| First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of GreenSky Holdings, LLC, dated August 24, 2018 | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of GreenSky Holdings, LLC, dated September 14, 2021 | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 4, 2021 | 10.1 |
| Tax Receivable Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Amendment No. 1 to the Tax Receivable Agreement, dated July 27, 2021 | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 4, 2021 | 10.2 |
| Exchange Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.2 |
| Credit Agreement, dated August 25, 2017, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated March 29, 2018, among GreenSky Holdings, LLC, the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.8 |
| Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated June 10, 2020, among GreenSky Holdings, LLC, the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.3 |
| Phoenix Blackstone Center Lease, as amended, with Phoenix Blackstone, LLC | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.18 |
| Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.9 |
|
| | | | | |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File Number | Date of Filing | Exhibit Number Reference |
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GreenSky, Inc. | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 3.1 |
| Amended and Restated Bylaws of GreenSky, Inc. (Effective as of January 31, 2019) | 8-K | 001-38506 | February 6, 2019 | 3.1 |
| Specimen Stock Certificate for shares of Class A Common Stock of GreenSky, Inc. | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 4.1 |
| Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 4.1 |
| GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | | | | |
| Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | | | | |
| Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | | | | |
| Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under GreenSky, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan | | | | |
| GreenSky Holdings, LLC Equity Incentive Plan | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.23 |
| GreenSky, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan | 8-K | 001-38506 | February 6, 2019 | 10.1 |
| Employment Agreement, dated September 25, 2014, with David Zalik | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.4 |
| Offer Letter, dated January 2, 2012, for Timothy D. Kaliban | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.5 |
| Form of Indemnification Agreement for each of GreenSky Inc.’s directors and executive officers | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.7 |
| Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of GreenSky Holdings, LLC, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.3 |
| First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of GreenSky Holdings, LLC, dated August 24, 2018 | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Tax Receivable Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.1 |
| Exchange Agreement, dated May 23, 2018 | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.2 |
| Credit Agreement, as amended, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.8 |
| Phoenix Blackstone Center Lease, as amended, with Phoenix Blackstone, LLC | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.19 |
| Second Amended and Restated GreenSky Installment Loan Program Agreement, dated April 26, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.17 |
| Amended and Restated Co-Branded MasterCard Card Program Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC (formerly GreenSky Trade Credit, LLC) and Comdata Network, Inc. | S-1/A | 333-224505 | May 7, 2018 | 10.16 |
| Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Co-Branded MasterCard Card Program Agreement, dated August 3, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Comdata Network, Inc. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.2 |
| Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and SunTrust Bank | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.9 |
| Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, dated September 28, 2018, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and SunTrust Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.3 |
| Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and SunTrust Bank | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.10 |
(3) Exhibits (continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File Number | Date of Filing | Exhibit Number Reference |
| Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, as amended, betweendated September 28, 2018, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and RegionsTruist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | S-110-Q | 333-224505001-38506 | April 27,November 9, 2018 | 10.1110.3 |
| Amendment No. 4 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, dated July 27, 2018, betweenFebruary 20, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and RegionsTruist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | May 15, 2019 | 10.2 |
| Amendment No. 5 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, dated October 30, 2018, betweenFebruary 28, 2020, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and RegionsTruist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | May 11, 2020 | 10.1 |
| Amendment No. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, dated December 15, 2021, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | | | | |
| Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and RegionsTruist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.1210.10 |
| Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated March 20, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | May 15, 2019 | 10.3 |
| Amendment No. 4 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated April 9, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 14, 2019 | 10.1 |
| Amendment No. 5 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated June 21, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 14, 2019 | 10.2 |
| Amendment No. 6 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated July 10, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 14, 2019 | 10.1 |
| Amendment No. 7 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated July 10, 2019, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 14, 2019 | 10.2 |
| Amendment No. 8 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated August 17, 2020, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2020 | 10.4 |
| Amendment No. 9 to Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated December 15, 2021, among GreenSky, LLC, GreenSky Servicing, LLC and Truist Bank (successor by merger to SunTrust Bank) | | | | |
| Loan Origination Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.13 |
| Fifth Amendment to Loan Origination Agreement, dated May 21, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.6 |
| Sixth Amendment to Loan Origination Agreement, dated September 5, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.6 |
| Seventh Amendment to Loan Origination Agreement, dated December 5, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.16(c) |
| Eighth Amendment to Loan Origination Agreement, dated September 30, 2019, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 14, 2019 | 10.3 |
| Ninth Amendment to Loan Origination Agreement, dated November 8, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | | | | |
| Servicing Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File Number | Date of Filing | Exhibit Number Reference |
| Fourth Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated May 21, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 8-K | 001-38506 | May 29, 2018 | 10.7 |
| Fifth Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated September 27, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.5 |
| Sixth Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated December 5, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.16(g) |
| Seventh Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated December 28, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.16(h) |
| Eighth Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated March 22, 2019, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | May 15, 2019 | 10.4 |
| Ninth Amendment to Servicing Agreement, dated September 30, 2019, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 14, 2019 | 10.4 |
| Second Amended and Restated Loan Origination Agreement, as amended,dated December 23, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank, National Association | S-110-K | 333-224505001-38506 | April 27, 2018March 10, 2021 | 10.1510.20 |
| Amendment No. 4 to Loan OriginationSecond Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated April 30, 2018,December 23, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank, National Association | S-1/A10-K | 333-224505001-38506 | May 7, 2018March 10, 2021 | 10.14(a)10.20(a) |
| Amendment No. 5 to Loan Origination Agreement, dated November 1, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank | | | | |
| Servicing Agreement, as amended, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank | S-1 | 333-224505 | April 27, 2018 | 10.16 |
| Amendment No. 4 to Servicing Agreement, dated June 29, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2018 | 10.6 |
| Amendment No. 5 to Servicing Agreement, dated September 27, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and Fifth Third Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | November 9, 2018 | 10.4 |
| Loan Origination Agreement, dated November 5, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | 10.18 |
| Amendment No. 1 to Loan Origination Agreement, dated June 30, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.6 |
| Amendment No. 2 to Loan Origination Agreement, dated April 16, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 5, 2021 | 10.1 |
| Servicing Agreement, dated November 5, 2018, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 15, 2019 | |
(3) Exhibits (continued)
| 10.18(a) |
| Amendment No. 1 to Servicing Agreement, dated June 30, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.6(a) |
| Amendment No. 2 to Servicing Agreement, dated April 16, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 5, 2021 | 10.2 |
| Amendment No. 3 to Servicing Agreement, dated December 7, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and BMO Harris Bank N.A. | | | | |
Exhibit Number | Exhibit DescriptionFacility Loan Origination Agreement, dated May 27, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | Form10-Q | File Number001-38506 | Date of FilingAugust 10, 2020 | Exhibit Number Reference10.5 |
| First Amendment to Facility Loan Origination Agreement, dated November 8, 2021, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | | | | |
| Facility Servicing Agreement, dated May 27, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.5(a) |
| Economics Agreement, dated May 27, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-Q | 001-38506 | August 10, 2020 | 10.5(b) |
| First Amendment to Economics Agreement, dated December 31, 2020, between GreenSky, LLC and Synovus Bank | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 10, 2021 | 10.22(c) |
| Warehouse Credit Agreement, dated May 11, 2020, as amended by Amendment No. 1, dated July 24, 2020, Amendment No. 2, dated December 1, 2020 and Amendment No. 3, dated December 18, 2020, among GS Investment I, LLC, the lenders from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | 10-K | 001-38506 | March 10, 2021 | 10.23 |
| Amendment No. 4 to Warehouse Credit Agreement, dated December 1, 2021, among GS Investment I, LLC, the lenders from time to time party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | | | |
| List of Subsidiaries of GreenSky, Inc. | | | | |
| Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP | | | | |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | | | | |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | File Number | Date of Filing | Exhibit Number Reference |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | | | | |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 | | | | |
101.INS*101 | The following financial information from GreenSky, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, formatted in Inline XBRL Instance Document(Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. | | | | |
101.SCH*104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Documentdocument). | | | | |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | |
101.LAB** | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentFiled herewith. | | | | |
101.PRE*# | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | |
| | | | | |
* | Filed herewith. | | | | |
# | Confidential treatment has been granted as to certainCertain portions of this exhibit which portions have been omitted because they are both not material and filed separately withare the SEC.type that the Company treats as private or confidential. | | | | |
##† | Confidential treatment has been requested as to certain portions of this exhibit, which portions have been omitted and filed separately with the SEC. | | | | |
† | Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement. | | | | |
(b) See Item 15(a)(3) and separate Exhibit Index attached hereto and incorporated herein.
(c) (1) Not applicable.
(2) Not applicable.
(3) See Item 15(a)(2) and separate Schedule II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts attached hereto.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | |
| | | |
| | | | GREENSKY, INC. |
| | | |
| March 11, 2022 | | GREENSKY, INC. |
| By | | | |
March 15, 2019 | | By | /s/ David Zalik |
| | | David Zalik Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated as of March 15, 2019.
11, 2022. | | | | | | | | |
| Signatures | | Title |
| | |
Signatures | | Title |
| /s/ David Zalik | | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
| David Zalik | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
| | |
/s/ Robert PartlowAndrew Kang | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Robert PartlowAndrew Kang | | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| | |
| /s/ Angela Nagy | | Chief Accounting Officer |
| Angela Nagy | | (Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | |
| /s/ Gerald Benjamin | | Chief Administrative Officer, Vice Chairman and Director |
| Gerald Benjamin | | |
| | |
| /s/ Joel Babbit | | Director |
| Joel Babbit | | |
| | |
/s/ John FlynnArthur Bacci | | Director |
John FlynnArthur Bacci | | |
| | |
| /s/ Gregg Freishtat | | Director |
| Gregg Freishtat | | |
| | |
/s/ Nigel Morris | | Director |
Nigel Morris | | |
| | |
/s/ Robert Sheft | | Director |
Robert Sheft | | |
Schedule II. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
GreenSky, Inc. and Subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at beginning of period | | Charged to costs and expenses(1) | | | | Deductions | | Balance at
end of period |
| | (in thousands) |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 168 | | | $ | 950 | | | | | $ | (880) | | | $ | 238 | |
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | 676 | | | 3,895 | | | | | (2,606) | | | 1,965 | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 238 | | | $ | 644 | | | | | $ | (569) | | | $ | 313 | |
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | 1,965 | | | 67,488 | | | | | (59,247) | | | 10,206 | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 313 | | | $ | 35 | | | | | $ | (198) | | | $ | 150 | |
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | 10,206 | | | 31,284 | | | | | (37,493) | | | 3,997 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Additions | | | | |
| | | Balance at beginning of period | | Charged to
costs and expenses(1) | | Charged to
other accounts(1) | | Deductions | | Balance at
end of period |
| | | (in thousands) |
| Year Ended December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 133 |
| | $ | 966 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (733 | ) | | $ | 366 |
|
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | — |
| | $ | 1,742 |
| | — |
| | (1,742 | ) | | — |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 366 |
| | $ | 817 |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | (923 | ) | | $ | 276 |
|
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | — |
| | 3,551 |
| | — |
| | (2,967 | ) | | 584 |
|
| Year Ended December 31, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for losses on accounts receivable | | $ | 276 |
| | $ | 1,294 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | (1,419 | ) | | $ | 168 |
|
| Valuation allowance on loan receivables held for sale | | 584 |
| | 2,671 |
| | — |
| | (2,579 | ) | | 676 |
|
(1)Includes bad debt recoveries.
