Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
PART III

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A10-K

AMENDMENT NO. 1

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20022003

or

For the transition period from                             to                             

Commission File Number 1-13045

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

617-535-4766
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý    No o

        As of June 28, 2002,30, 2003, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,232,338,238.25$2,658,636,421 based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.

        Number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock at June 2, 2003:    85,265,119March 1, 2004:    85,775,503

EXPLANATORY NOTE:

        This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A is being filed for the purpose of amending and restating Items 1, 6, 7 and 15, as well as, amending Notes 6 and 12 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003. The changes are primarily for the purpose of compliance with Regulation G as a result of having filed a Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 on May 23, 2003. Except with respect to Item 15(b) (which updates the Form 10-K for Current Reports on Form 8-K between March 21, 2003 and June 5, 2003), this Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-K.

IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
20022003 FORM 10-K/A10-K ANNUAL REPORT

Table of Contents

i

        References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to "the Company", "we", "us" or "our" include Iron Mountain Incorporated and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Certain information required in Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about May 27, 2004.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        We have made statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that constitute "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and in other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements concern our operations, economic performance, financial condition, goals, beliefs, strategies, objectives, plans and current expectations. The forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. When we use words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates" or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.

        Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others:

•

changes in customer preferences and demand for our services;



•

changes in the price for our services relative to the cost of providing such services;



•

the cost and availability of financing for contemplated growth;



•

our ability or inability to complete acquisitions on satisfactory terms and to integrate acquired companies efficiently;



•

in the various digital businesses in which we are engaged, capital and technical requirements will be beyond our means, markets for our services will be less robust than anticipated, or competition will be more intense than anticipated;



•

changes in the political and economic environments in the countries in which our international subsidiaries operate, including foreign currency fluctuations;



•

the possibility that business partners upon whom we depend for technical assistance or management and acquisition expertise outside the U.S. will not perform as anticipated; and



•

other trends in competitive or economic conditions affecting our financial condition or results of operations not presently contemplated.

        You should not rely upon forward-looking statements except as statements of our present intentions and of our present expectations, which may or may not occur. You should read these cautionary statements as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we have made in this document, as well as our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or "SEC").

ii

PART I

Item 1. Business.

A. Development of Business.

        We are the leader in records and information management services ("RIMS").services. We are an international, full-service provider of records and information management and related services, enabling customers to outsource these functions. We have a diversified customer base that includes more than halfcomprised of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment, and government organizations.organizations, including more than half of the Fortune 500 and more than two thirds of the FTSE 100. Our comprehensive solutions help customers save money and manage risks associated with legal and regulatory compliance, protection of vital assets, and business continuity challenges.

        Our core business records management services include: records management program development and implementation based on best-practices;best-practices to help customers comply with specific regulatory requirements; implementation of policy-based programs that feature secure, cost-effective storage for all major media, including paper, which is the dominant form of records storage, flexible retrieval access and retention of records;management; digital archiving services for secure, legally compliant and cost-effective long-term archiving of electronic records; secure shredding services that ensure privacy and a secure chain of record custody; and customizedspecialized services for vital records, film and sound and regulated industries such as healthcare, energy and financial services.

        Our off-site data protection services include: disaster recoverypreparedness planning testing, impact analysis and consulting;support; secure, off-site vaulting of data backup tapesmedia for fast and efficient data recovery in the event of a disaster, human error or virus; electronic vaulting to provide managed, online data backup and recovery services for personal computers and server data; and intellectual property escrow services to secureprotect and manage source code and other proprietary information with a trusted, neutral third party.

        In addition to our core records management and off-site data protection services, we sell storage materials, including cardboard boxes and magnetic media, and provide consulting, facilities management, fulfillment and other outsourcing services.

        Iron Mountain was founded in 1951 in an underground facility near Hudson, New York. Now in our 5253^ndrd year, we have experienced tremendous growth and organizational change, particularly since successfully completing the initial public offering of our common stock in February 1996. Since then, we have built ourselves from a regional business with limited product offerings and annual revenues of $104 million in 1995 into the leader in records and information management services, providing a full range of services to customers in markets around the world. For the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, we had total revenues of more than $1.3$1.5 billion.

        The growth since 1995 has been accomplished primarily through the acquisition of domesticU.S. and international records management companies. The goal of our current acquisition program is to supplement internal growth by continuing to establish a footprint in targeted international markets and adding fold-in acquisitions both domesticallyin the U.S. and internationally. Having substantially completed our North American geographic expansion by the end of 2000, we shifted our focus from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. In 2001, as a result of this shift, internal revenue growth exceeded growth through acquisitions for the first time since we began our acquisition program in 1996. This was also the case in 2002. In addition, our capital expenditures, made primarily to support internal growth, exceeded2002 and 2003, and in the aggregateabsence of unusual acquisition considerationactivity, we conveyed in both 2001 and 2002. We expect this trend to continue andcontinue. We expect to achieve thisour internal revenue growth through a sophisticated new sales and account management coverage model that is designed to drive incremental revenue by acquiring new customer relationships, increasing the use of aggressive selling efforts to acquire new customersrevenue generated by existing customer relationships and by offeringeffectively selling a wide range of complementary and ancillary services to expand our new and existing customer relationships.

        On February 1, 2000, we completed our most important acquisition to date by merging with Pierce Leahy Corp. in a stock-for-stock merger valued at $1.0 billion, including the assumption of debt and

1

related transaction costs.        In July 2003, we and Iron Mountain Europe ("IME"), our European joint venture, completed the acquisition of the records management operations of Hays plc ("Hays IMS") in two simultaneous transactions for aggregate cash consideration (including transactions costs) of approximately 205 million British pounds sterling ($333 million). IME acquired the European operations and we acquired the U.S. operations. IME's acquisition of Hays IMS has more than doubled our revenue base in Europe and has significantly strengthened our energy and U.K. public sector business lines. Since the merger,acquisition, we hadhave been integrating the cultures, operating systems and procedures, and information technology systems of Iron MountainIME and Pierce Leahy. WeHays IMS.

        In February 2004, we completed the integration processacquisition of Mentmore plc's 49.9% equity interest in 2002 aheadIME for total consideration of schedule. See Note 782.5 million British pounds sterling ($154 million) in cash. Included in this amount is the repayment of all trade and working capital funding owed to NotesMentmore by IME. Completion of the transaction gives us 100% ownership of IME, affording us full access to Consolidated Financial Statements.all future cash flows and greater strategic and financial flexibility.

        As of December 31, 2002,2003, we provided services to over 150,000200,000 customer accounts in 8182 markets in the United StatesU.S. and 4758 markets outside of the United States,U.S., employed over 11,50013,000 people and operated approximately 650800 records management facilities in the United States,U.S., Canada, Europe and Latin America.

B. Description of Business.

The Records and Information Management Services Industry

Overview

        Companies in the RIMSrecords and information management services industry store and manage information in a variety of media formats, which can broadly be divided into paperphysical and electronic records, and provide a wide range of services related to the records stored. We refer to our general paperphysical records storage and management services as "businessbusiness records management." Paper We define physical records are defined to include paper documents, as well as all other non-electronic media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints. Electronic records include various forms of magnetic media such as computer tapes and hard drives and optical disks. We include in our electronic records storage and management services (i) "off-site(1) off-site data protection"protection and (ii) "digital(2) digital archiving services."

PaperPhysical Records

        PaperPhysical records may be broadly divided into two categories: active and inactive. Active records relate to ongoing and recently completed activities or contain information that is frequently referenced. Active records are usually stored and managed on-site by the organization that originated them to ensure ready availability. Inactive paperphysical records are the principal focus of the RIMSrecords and information management services industry. Inactive records consist of those records that are not needed for immediate access but which must be retained for legal, regulatory and compliance reasons or for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations. A large and growing specialty subset of the paperphysical records market is medical records. These are active and semi-active records that are often stored off-site with and serviced by a RIMSrecords and information management services vendor. Special regulatory requirements often apply to medical records.

Electronic Records

        Electronic records management focuses on the storage of, and related services for, computer media that areis either a backup copy of recently processed data or archival in nature. Customer needs for data backup and recovery and archiving are distinctively different. Backup data exists because of the need of many businesses to maintain backup copies of their data in order to be able to recover the data in the event of a system failure, casualty loss or other disaster. It is customary (and a

2

best-practice) for data processing groups to rotate backup tapes to off-site locations on a regular basis and to require multiple copies of such information at multiple sites. We refer to these services as off-site data protection.

        In addition to the physical rotation and storage of backup data, we have introducedoffer electronic vaulting services as an alternative way for businesses to transfer data to us, and to access the data they have stored with us. Electronic vaulting is a Web-based service that automatically backs up computer data over the Internet and stores it off site in one of our secure data centers. In early 2003, we announced an expansion of the electronic vaulting service to include backup and recovery for personal

2

computer data, answering customers' needs to protect critical business data, which is often orphaned and unprotected on employee laptops and desktop personal computers.

        There is a growing need for better ways of archiving data for legal, regulatory and compliance reasons and for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations. Historically, businesses have relied on backup tapes for storing archived data, but this process can be costly and ineffective when attempting to search and retrieve the data for litigation or other needs. In addition, many industries, such as healthcare and financial services, are facing increased governmental regulation mandating the way in which electronic records are stored and managed. To help customers meet these growing storage challenges, we introduced digital archiving services. We have experienced early market adoption of the service,these services, especially for e-mail archiving, which enables businesses to identify and retrieve electronic records quickly and cost-effectively, while maintaining regulatory compliance.

Growth of Market

        We believe that the volume of stored paperphysical and electronic records will continue to increase for a number of reasons, including: (i)(1) the rapid growth of inexpensive document producing technologies such as facsimile, desktop publishing software and desktop printing; (ii)(2) the continued proliferation of data processing technologies such as personal computers and networks; (iii)(3) regulatory requirements; (iv)(4) concerns over possible future litigation and the resulting increases in volume and holding periods of documentation; (v)(5) the high cost of reviewing records and deciding whether to retain or destroy them; (vi)(6) the failure of many entities to adopt or follow policies on records destruction; and (vii)(7) audit requirements to keep backup copies of certain records in off-site locations.

        We believe that paper-based information will continue to grow, not in spite of, but because of, new "paperless" technologies such as e-mail and the Internet. These technologies have prompted the creation of hard copies of such electronic information and have also led to increased demand for electronic records services, such as the storage and off-site rotation of backup copies of magnetic media. In addition, we believe that the proliferation of digital information technologies and distributed data networks has created an emerging need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality solutions for digital archiving and the management of electronic documents.

Consolidation of a Highly Fragmented Industry

        There was significant consolidation within the highly fragmented RIMSrecords and information management services industry from 1995 to 2000. Most RIMSrecords and information management services companies serve a single local market, and are often either owner-operated or ancillary to another business, such as a moving and storage company. We believe that the consolidation trend will continue because of the industry's capital requirements for growth, opportunities for large RIMSrecords and information management services providers to achieve economies of scale and customer demands for more sophisticated technology-based solutions.

        We believe that the consolidation trend in the industry is also due to, and will continue as a result of, the preference of certain large organizations to contract with one vendor in multiple cities and countries for multiple services. In particular, customers increasingly demand a single, large, sophisticated company to handle all of their important paperphysical and electronic records needs. Large,

3

national and multinational companies are better able to satisfy these demands than smaller competitors. We have made, and intend to continue to make, acquisitions of our competitors, many of whom are small, single city operators.

Description of Our Business

        We generate our revenues by providing storage for a variety of information media formats, core records management services and an expanding menu of complementary products and services to a large and diverse customer base. Providing outsourced storage for records and information is the

3

mainstay of our customer relationships and provides the foundation for our revenue growth. The core services, which are a vital part of a comprehensive records management program, are highly recurring in nature and therefore very predictable. Core services consist primarily of the handling and transportation of stored records and information. In our secure shredding business, core services consist primarily of the scheduled collection and handling of sensitive records. In 2002,2003, our storage and core service revenues represented approximately 85%87% of our total revenues. In addition to our core services, we offer a wide array of complementary products and services such as performing special project work, selling RIMS-relatedrecords and information management services related products, providing fulfillment services and consulting on records management issues. These services address more specific needs and are designed to enhance our customers' overall records management programs. These services complement our core services; however, they are more episodic and discretionary in nature. Revenue generated by our business records and off-site data protection businesses includes both core and complementary components.

        Our various operating segments offer the products and services discussed below. In general, our business records management segment offers records management, secure shredding, healthcare information services, vital records services, and service and courier operations in the United StatesU.S. and Canada. Our off-site data protection segment offers data backup and disaster recovery disaster services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and intellectual property protection services in the United States.U.S. Our international segment offers elements of all our product and services lines outside the United StatesU.S. and Canada. Our corporate and other segment includes our secure shredding, fulfillment, consulting and digital archiving services. Some of our complementary services and products are offered within all of our segments. The amount of revenues derived from our business records management, off-site data protection, international, and corporate and other operating segments and other relevant data for fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 20022003 are set forth in Note 12 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Records Management

        The hard copy business records stored by our customers with us by their nature are not very active. These types of records are stored in cartons packed by the customer. We use a proprietary order processing and inventory management system known as theSafekeeperPLUS® system to efficiently store and later retrieve a customer's cartons. As a central component of our integration plan for the Pierce Leahy transaction, we developed theSafekeeperPLUS® system and carried out a city-by-city conversion program that was completed in 2002. Storage charges are generally billed monthly on a per storage unit basis, usually either per carton or per cubic foot of records, and include the provision of space, racking, computerized inventory and activity tracking and physical security.

Off-Site Data Protection

        Off-site data protection services consist of the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery and business continuity plans. Computer tapes, cartridges and disk packs are transported off-site by our courier operations on a scheduled basis to secure, climate-controlled facilities, where they are available to customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to facilitate data recovery in the event of a disaster. We use various proprieteryproprietary information technology systems such asMediaLink™ andSecureBase™ software to manage this process. We also manage tape library relocations and support disaster recovery testing and execution. In addition, we have introduced electronic vaulting services as part of our off-site data protection services product line. Our electronic

4

vaulting service automatically backs up personal computer and server data over the Internet and stores it off site in one of our secure data centers, always available in the event of a disaster.

Healthcare Information Services

        Healthcare information services principally include the handling, storage, filing, processing and retrieval of medical records used by hospitals, private practitioners and other medical institutions.

4

Medical records tend to be more active in nature and are typically stored on specialized open shelving systems that provide easier access to individual files. Healthcare information services also include recurring project work and ancillary services. Recurring project work involves the on-site removal of aged patient files and related computerized file indexing. Ancillary healthcare information services include release of information (medical record copying), temporary staffing, contract coding, facilities management and imaging.

Vital Records Services

        Vital records contain critical or irreplaceable data such as master audio and video recordings, film, software source code and other highly proprietary information. Vital records may require special facilities or services, either because of the data they contain or the media on which they are recorded. Our charges for providing enhanced security and special climate-controlled environments for vital records are higher than for typical storage functions. We provide the same ancillary services for vital records as we provide for our other storage operations.

Service and Courier Operations

        Service and courier operations are an integral part of a comprehensive records management program for all physical media including paper and electronic records. They include adding records to storage, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, permanent withdrawals from storage, and destruction of records. Service charges are generally assessed for each procedure on a per unit basis. TheSafekeeperPLUS® system controls the service processes from order entry through transportation and invoicing for business records management whileMediaLink™ andSecureBase™ systems manage the process for the off-site data protection services.services business.

        Courier operations consist primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request. Charges for courier services are based on urgency of delivery, volume and location and are billed monthly. As of December 31, 2002,2003, we were utilizing a fleet of more than 2,1002,000 owned or leased vehicles.

Secure Shredding

        Secure shredding is a natural extension of our records management services, completing the lifecycle of a record. The service involves the shredding of sensitive documents for corporate customers that, in many cases, also use our services for management of less sensitive archival records. We believe that customers are motivated by increased privacy regulation and the desire to protect their proprietary trade secrets. These services typically include the scheduled pick-up of loose office records which customers accumulate in specially designed secure containers we provide. Complementary to our shredding operations is the sale of the resultant waste paper to third-party recyclers. We currently perform theseThrough a combination of plant based shredding operations and mobile shredding units comprised of custom built trucks, we are able to offer secure shredding services to our customers in 40 citiesall of our existing business records management markets throughout the U.S. and Canada. We seek to expand our presence in this business through acquisitions and internal start-ups that leverage our existing records management infrastructure.

5

Intellectual Property Protection Services

        We provide intellectual property protection services through our wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, DSI Technology Escrow Services, Inc. DSI specializes in third party technology escrow services that protect intellectual property assets such as software source code. In addition, DSI assists in securing intellectual property as collateral for lending, investments and other joint ventures, in managing domain name registrations and transfers, and provides expertise and assistance to brokers and dealers in complying with electronic records regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commission or SEC.

5

Digital Archiving Services

        Our digital archiving services focus on archiving digital information with long-term preservation requirements. These services represent the digital analogy to our paperphysical records management services. Because of increased litigation risks and regulatory mandates, companies are increasingly aware of the need to apply the same records management policies and retention schedules to electronic data as they do paperphysical records. Typical digital records include e-mail, e-statements, images, electronic documents retained for legal or compliance purposes and other data documenting business transactions.

        The growth rate of mission-critical digital information is accelerating, driven in part by the use of the Internet as a distribution and transaction medium. The rising cost and increasing importance of digital information management, coupled with the increasing availability of telecommunications bandwidth at lower costs, may create meaningful opportunities for us. We continue to cultivate marketing and technology partnerships to support this anticipated growth.

        We believe the issues encountered by customers trying to manage their electronic records are similar to the ones they face in their business records management programs and consist primarily of: (i)(1) storage capacity and the preservation of data; (ii)(2) access to and control over the data in a secure environment; and (iii)(3) the need to retain electronic records due to regulatory compliance or for litigation support. Our digital archiving service is representative of our commitment to address evolving records management needs and expand the array of services we offer.

Complementary Services and Products

        We offer a variety of additional services which customers may request or contract for on an individual basis. These services include conducting records inventories, packing records into cartons or other containers, and creating computerized indices of files and individual documents. We also provide services for the management of active records programs. We can provide these services, which generally include document and file processing and storage, both off-site at our own facilities and by supplying our own personnel to perform management functions on-site at the customer's premises.

        Other complementary lines of business that we operate include fulfillment services and professional consulting services. Fulfillment services are performed by our wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, COMAC, Inc. COMAC stores customer marketing literature and delivers this material to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers' sites based on current and prospective customer orders. In addition, COMAC assembles custom marketing packages and orders, and manages and provides detailed reporting on customer marketing literature inventories.

        We provide professional consulting services to customers, enabling them to develop and implement comprehensive records and information management programs. Our consulting business draws on our experience in RIMSrecords and information management services to analyze the practices of companies and assist them in creating more effective programs of records and information management. Our consultants work with these customers to develop policies for document review, analysis and evaluation and for scheduling of document retention and destruction.

        We also sell: (i)(1) a full line of specially designed corrugated cardboard, metal and plastic storage containers; (ii)(2) magnetic media products including computer tapes, cartridges and drives, tape cleaners

6

and supplies and CDs; and (iii)(3) computer room equipment and supplies such as racking systems, furniture, bar code scanners and printers.

6

Financial Characteristics of Our Business

        Our financial model is based on the recurring nature of our revenues. The historical predictability of this revenue stream and the resulting EBITDA¹ (earnings from continuing operationsoperating income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)amortization (OIBDA)¹ allow us to operate with a high degree of financial leverage. Our primary financial goal has always been, and continues to be, to increase consolidated EBITDAOIBDA in relation to capital invested, even as our focus has shifted from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. EBITDA is a source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Our business has the following financial characteristics:

1

WeFor a more detailed definition and reconciliation of OIBDA and a discussion of why we believe that EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciationthis measure provides relevant and amortization) is useful information to our current and potential investors, because it is an important financial measure used in evaluating our performance, as EBITDA is an internally generated source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Externally, holders of our publicly issued debt use EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as important criteria for evaluating us and, as a result, all of our bond indentures and covenants include EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of financial performance. However, EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and you should not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for operating or net income (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP) as indicators of our performance or for cash flow from operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. Seesee Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for discussions of other measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP and our sources and applications of cash flow.Operations—Non-GAAP Measures."

•

Recurring Revenues.  We derive a majority of our consolidated revenues from fixed periodic, usually monthly, fees charged to customers based on the volume of records stored. Our quarterly revenues from these fixed periodic storage fees have grown for 5660 consecutive quarters. Once a customer places paperphysical records in storage with us and until those records are destroyed or permanently removed, for which we typically receive a service fee, we receive recurring payments for storage fees without incurring additional labor or marketing expenses or significant capital costs. Similarly, contracts for the storage of electronic backup media consist primarily of fixed monthly payments. In each of the last five years, storage revenues, which are stable and recurring, have accounted for approximately 58% of our total revenues. This stable and growing storage revenue base also provides the foundation for increases in service revenues and EBITDA.OIBDA.

•

Historically Non-Cyclical Storage Business.  We have not experienced any significant reductions ofin our storage business as a result of past general economic downturns, although we can give no assurance that this would be the case in the future. During this most recent economic slowdown some customers delayed or postponed expenditures for certain complementary records management projects. Additionally, the rate at which customers added new cartons to their inventory with us slowed somewhat, which may be a result of current economic conditions. We believe that companies that have outsourced RIMS programsrecords and information management services are less likely during economic downturns to incur the move-out costs and other expenses associated with switching vendors or moving their RIMSrecords and information management services programs in-house. However, during this most recent economic slowdown, the rate at which some customers may cancel or delay certain non-recurring or discretionary expendituresadded new cartons to their inventory was below historical levels. The net effect of these factors is the continued growth of our storage revenue base, albeit at a lower rate.

2

We define "Carton" as a meansmeasurement of reducing their short-term costs.volume equal to a single standard storage carton, approximately 1.2 cubic feet.

3

We define "Net Carton Growth From Existing Customers" as the net increase in Cartons attributable to existing customers. This calculation excludes our Latin American and European operations as well as a portion of our medical records operations.

•

Inherent Growth from Existing PaperPhysical Records Customers.  Our paperphysical records customers have on average generated additional Cartons² at a faster rate than stored Cartons have been destroyed or permanently removed. From January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2001, our annual Net Carton Growth From Existing Customers³

ranged from approximately 4% to approximately 6%. For the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, Net Carton Growth from Existing Customers was between 3% to 4%. We believe the consistent growth of our paperphysical records storage revenues is the result of a number of factors, including: (i)(1) the trend toward increased records retention;

(2) customer satisfaction with our services; and (3) the costs and

7

(ii) customer satisfaction with our services; and (iii) the costs and inconvenience of moving storage operations in-house or to another provider of RIMS.records and information management services.

2

We define "Carton" as a measurement of volume equal to a single standard storage carton, approximately 1.2 cubic feet.

3

We define "Net Carton Growth From Existing Customers" as the increase in net Cartons attributable to existing customers without giving effect to the loss of approximately 1.0 million Cartons in fires attributed to arson in March 1997 in two of our facilities in South Brunswick Township, New Jersey. See Item 3. "Legal Proceedings". This calculation also excludes our Latin American and European operations as well as a portion of our medical records operations.

•

Diversified and Stable Customer Base.  As of December 31, 2002,2003, we had over 150,000200,000 customer accounts in a variety of industries. We currently provide services to more than half of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations.organizations, including more than half of the Fortune 500 and more than two thirds of the FTSE 100. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002.2003. From January 1, 19981999 through December 31, 2002,2003, average annual permanent removals of Cartons, not including destructions, represented approximately 3% of total Cartons stored.

•

Capital Expenditures Related Primarily to Growth.  Our RIMSrecords and information management services business requires limited annual capital expenditures made in order to maintain our current revenue stream. From January 1, 19981999 through December 31, 2002,2003, over 85% of our aggregate capital expenditures were growth-related investments, primarily in storage systems, which include racking, building improvements and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and new buildings. These growth-related capital expenditures are primarily discretionary and create additional capacity for increases in revenues and EBITDA.OIBDA. In addition, since shifting our focus from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth, our capital expenditures, made primarily to support our internal revenue growth, have exceeded the aggregate acquisition consideration we conveyed in both 2001 and 2002. Although this was not the case in 2003 due to the acquisition of Hays IMS, we expect this to be the case in 2004 and thereafter absent unusual acquisition activity.

8

Growth Strategy

        Our objective is to maintain our position as the leader in RIMS. Domestically,records and information management services. In the U.S. and Canada, we seek to be one of the largest RIMSrecords and information management services providers in each of our geographic markets. Internationally, our objectives are to continue to capitalize on our expertise in the RIMSrecords and information management services industry and to make additional acquisitions and investments in selected international markets. Our primary avenues of growth are: (i)(1) increased business with existing customers; (ii)(2) the addition of new customers; (iii)(3) the introduction of new products and services such as secure shredding, electronic vaulting and digital archiving; and (iv)(4) selective acquisitions in new and existing markets.

Growth from Existing Customers

        Our existing customers storing paperphysical records contribute to storage and storage-related service revenues growth because on average they generate additional Cartons at a faster rate than old Cartons are destroyed or permanently removed. In order to maximize growth opportunities from existing customers, we seek to maintain high levels of customer retention by providing premium customer service through our local account management staff.

        ThroughOur new sales coverage model is designed to identify and capitalize on incremental revenue opportunities by reallocating our local accountsales resources based on a more sophisticated segmentation of our customer base and selling additional business records management staff, weand off-site data protection services within our existing customer relationships. We also seek to leverage existing business relationships with our customers by selling complementary services and products. Services include records tracking, indexing, customized reporting, vital records management and consulting services.

Addition of New Customers

        Our sales force isforces are dedicated to twothree primary objectives: (1) establishing new customer account relationships, (2) generating additional revenue from existing customers and (3) expanding new and

8

existing customer relationships by offeringeffectively selling a wide array of complementary services and products. In order to accomplish these objectives, our sales force drawsforces draw on our nationalU.S. and international marketing organizationorganizations and senior management. As a result of acquisitions and our decision to recruit additional qualified sales professionals, we have increased the size of our sales force to approximately 450600 such professionals as of December 31, 20022003 from approximately 390450 as of December 31, 2001.2002.

Introduction of New Products and Services

        We continue to expand our menu of products and services. We have significantly increased ourestablished a national presence in the U.S. and Canadian secure shredding industry and have developedoffer new electronic vaulting and digital archiving services. These new products and services allow us to further penetrate our existing customer accounts and attract new customers in previously untapped markets.

Growth through Domestic Acquisitions

        Our domestic acquisition strategy includes expanding geographically, as necessary, and increasing our presence and scale within existing markets through "fold-in" acquisitions. We have a successful record of acquiring and integrating RIMSrecords and information management services companies. Between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, the height of our acquisition activity, we completed 66 domestic78 acquisitions in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Latin America for total consideration of approximately $2 billion. During that period, we substantially completed our geographic expansion in the U.S. and Canada and began to expand in Europe and Latin America. Between January 1, 2001 and 2002,December 31, 2003, we completed 18 domestican additional 34 acquisitions for total consideration of $78.6 million.approximately $500 million (including the Hays IMS acquisition in July 2003 for approximately $333 million), primarily in the secure shredding industry in the U.S. and the records and information management industry in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Latin America.

Acquisitions in the U.S. and Canada

        We intend to continue our domestic acquisition program.program in the U.S. and Canada focusing on the secure shredding industry, expanding geographically, as necessary and building scale in some of our smaller markets through "fold-in" acquisitions. However, given the small number of large acquisition prospects and our increased revenue base, future acquisitions are expected to be less significant to overall domesticU.S. and Canadian revenue growth than they were prior to 2001.

International Growth Strategy

        We also intend to continue to make acquisitions and investments in RIMSrecords and information management services businesses outside the United States.U.S. and Canada. We have acquired and invested in, and seek to acquire and invest in, RIMSrecords and information management services companies

9

in countries, and, more specifically, markets within such countries, where we believe there is sufficient demand from existing multinational customers or the potential for significant growth. Since beginning our international expansion program in January 1999, we have directly and through joint ventures, we have expanded our operations into Canada,19 countries in Europe and Latin America. Through December 31, 2000, we completed 12 international acquisitions for total consideration of $119.2 million. During 2001 and 2002, we completed eight international acquisitions for total consideration of $41.7 million. These transactions have taken, and may continue to take, the form of acquisitions of the entire business or controlling or minority investments, with a long-term goal of full ownership. In addition to the criteria we use to evaluate domesticU.S. and Canadian acquisition candidates, we also evaluate the presence in the potential market of our existing clientscustomers as well as the risks uniquely associated with an international investment, including those risks described below.

        The experience, depth and strength of local management are particularly important in our international acquisition strategy. As a result, we have formed joint ventures with, or acquired significant interests in, target businesses throughout Europe and Latin America. We havebegan our international expansion by acquiring a 50.1% controlling interest in each of our Iron Mountain Europe

9

Limited, Iron Mountain South America, Ltd. and Sistemas de Archivo Corporativo (a Mexican limited liability company) subsidiaries. Iron Mountain South America has in some cases bought controlling, yet not full, ownership in local businesses in order to enhance our local market expertise. We believe this strategy, rather than an outright acquisition, may, in certain markets, better position us to expand the existing business, although our long-term goal is to acquire full ownership of each such business. The local partner benefits from our expertise in the RIMSrecords and information management services industry, our access to capital and our technology, and we benefit from our local partner's knowledge of the market, relationships with customers and their presence in the community. Our long-term goal is to acquire full ownership of each such business, as evidenced by our recent acquisition of Mentmore's 49.9% equity interest in IME discussed previously under "—A. Development of Business."

        Our international investments are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to the indigenous political, social, regulatory, tax and economic structures of other countries, as well as fluctuations in currency valuation, exchange controls, expropriation and governmental policies limiting returns to foreign investors. At this time, there can be no assurance as to whether any international investment will be successful in achieving our objectives.

        The amount of our revenues derived from international operations and other relevant financial data for fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 20022003 are set forth in Note 12 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For the year ended December 31, 2002,2003, we derived approximately 14%19% of our total revenues from outside of the United States.U.S. We expect this percentage to increase in 2004 due to the acquisition of the European operations of Hays IMS.

Customers

        Our customer base is diversified in terms of revenues and industry concentration. We track customer accounts based on invoices. Accordingly, depending upon how many invoices have been arranged at the request of a customer, one organization may represent multiple customer accounts. As of December 31, 2002,2003, we had over 150,000200,000 customer accounts in a variety of industries. We currently provide services to more than half of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations.organizations, including more than half of the Fortune 500 and more than two thirds of the FTSE 100. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002.2003.

Competition

        We compete with our current and potential customers' internal RIMSrecords and information management services capabilities. We can provide no assurance that these organizations will begin or continue to use an outside company such as Iron Mountain for their future records and information management services.

        We compete with multiple RIMSrecords and information management services providers in all geographic areas where we operate. We believe that competition for customers is based on price, reputation for reliability, quality of service and scope and scale of technology and that we generally compete effectively based on these factors.

10

        We also compete with other RIMSrecords and information management services providers for companies to acquire. Some of our competitors may possess substantial financial and other resources. If any such competitor were to devote additional resources to the RIMSrecords and information management services business and such acquisition candidates or focus their strategy on our markets, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Alternative Technologies

        We derive most of our revenues from the storage of paper documents and storage-related services. This storage requires significant physical space. Alternative storage technologies exist, many of which

10

require significantly less space than paper.paper documents. These technologies include computer media, microform, CD-ROM and optical disk. To date, none of these technologies has replaced paper documents as the principal means for storing information. However, we can provide no assurance that our customers will continue to store most of their records in paper documents format. A significant shift by our customers to storage of data through non-paper documents based technologies, whether now existing or developed in the future, could adversely affect our business. We continue to invest in additional services such as electronic vaulting and digital archiving, designed to address our customers' need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality solutions for electronic records and information management.

Employees

        As of December 31, 2002,2003, we employed approximately 8,800 full-timeover 9,000 employees in the United States.U.S. Directly and through majority-owned joint ventures, as of December 31, 2002,2003, we employed approximately 3,000 full-timeover 4,000 employees outside of the United States.U.S. A small percentage of our employees are represented by unions. These unionized employees are located in California and one citytwo cities in Canada. As of December 31, 2002,2003, the aggregate number of unionized employees was approximately 350.less than 450.

        All domestic non-union employees are generally eligible to participate in our benefit programs, which include medical, dental, life, short and long-term disability, retirement/401(k) and accidental death and dismemberment plans. Unionized employees receive these types of benefits through their unions. In addition to base compensation and other usual benefits, all full-time domestic employees participate in some form of incentive-based compensation program that provides payments based on revenues, profits, collections or attainment of specified objectives for the unit in which they work. International employees participate in separate benefit and incentive-based compensation programs. Management believes that we have good relationships with our employees and unions.

Insurance

        For strategic risk transfer purposes, we maintain a comprehensive insurance program with insurers that we believe to be reputable and that have adequate market security in amounts that we believe to be appropriate. Property insurance is purchased on an all-risk basis, including flood earthquake and terrorism,earthquake, subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits and deductibles, and inclusive of the replacement cost of real and personal property, including leasehold improvements, business income loss and extra expense. Separate excess policies for insurer defined Critical Earthquake Zone exposures are maintained at what we believe to be appropriate limits and deductibles for that exposure. Included among other types of insurance that we carry are: workers compensation, general liability, umbrella, automobile, professional and directors and officers liability policies, subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits and deductibles. In 2002, we established a wholly ownedwholly-owned Vermont domiciled captive insurance company as a subsidiary; through the subsidiary we retain and reinsure a portion of our property loss exposure.

        Our standard form of storage contract sets forth an agreed maximum valuation for each carton or other storage unit held by us, which serves as a limitation of liability for loss or damage, as permitted under the Uniform Commercial Code. In contracts containing such limits, such values are nominal, and

11

we believe that in typical circumstances our liability would be so limited in the event of loss or damage to stored items for which we may be held liable. However, some of our agreements with large volume accounts and some of the contracts assumed in our acquisitions and some of our contracts outside the RIMS businesses contain no such limits or contain higher limits or supplemental insurance arrangements. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for a description of claims by particular customers seeking to rescind their contracts, including limitations on liability, as a result of the fires experienced at our South Brunswick Township, New Jersey facilities in 1997.

11

Environmental Matters

        Some of our currently and formerly owned or operated properties were previously used by entities other than us for industrial or other purposes that involved the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum products or may have involved the generation of hazardous wastes. In some instances these properties included the operation of underground storage tanks or the presence of asbestos-containing materials. We have undertaken remediation activities at some of our properties. Although we regularly conduct limited environmental reviews of real property that we intend to purchase, we have not undertaken an in-depth environmental review of all of our owned and operated properties. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, we may be potentially liable for environmental compliance and remediation costs to address contamination, if any, located at owned and operated properties as well as damages arising from such contamination. Environmental conditions for which we might be liable may also exist at properties that we may acquire in the future. In addition, future regulatory action and environmental laws may impose costs for environmental compliance that do not exist today.

        We currently transfer a portion of our risk of financial loss due to currently undetected environmental matters by purchasing a pollutionan environmental impairment liability insurance policy, which covers all owned and leased locations. Coverage is provided for both liability and remediation costs.

Internet Website

        Our Internet address is www.ironmountain.com.www.ironmountain.com. Under the "Investor Relations" category on our Internet website, we make available through a hyperlink to a third party SEC website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") as soon as reasonably practicable after such forms are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. We are not including the information contained on or available through our website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report. Copies of our corporate governance guidelines, code of ethics and the charters of our audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees may be obtained free of charge by writing to our Secretary, Iron Mountain Incorporated, 745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111 and will be available on our website www.ironmountain.com under the heading "Corporate Governance" prior to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about May 27, 2004.

Item 2. Properties.

        As of December 31, 2003, we conducted operations through 582 leased facilities and 207 facilities that we own or are owned by variable interest entities that we consolidate. Our facilities are divided among our reportable segments as follows: Business Records Management (524), Off-Site Data Protection (60), International (187) and Corporate and Other (18). These facilities contain a total of 49.3 million square feet of space. Rent expense was $134.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The leased facilities typically have initial lease terms of ten years with options to renew for an additional five to ten years. In addition, some of the leases contain either a purchase option or a right of first refusal upon the sale of the property. Our facilities are located throughout North America, Europe and Latin America, with the largest number of facilities in California, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, Texas, Canada and the U.K. We believe that the space available in our facilities is adequate to meet our current needs, although future growth may require that we acquire additional real property either by leasing or purchasing. See Note 13 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our minimum annual rental commitments.

12

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Sequedex, H-W Associates, Pioneer and Pierce Proceedings

        On March 28, 2002, Iron Mountain and Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. ("IMIM"), one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, commenced an action in the Middlesex County, New Jersey, Superior Court, Chancery Division, captioned Iron Mountain Incorporated and Iron Mountain Information Management, Inc. v. J. Peter Pierce, Sr., Douglas B. Huntley, J. Michael Gold, Fred A. Mathewson, Jr., Michael DiIanni, J. Anthony Hayden, Pioneer Capital, LLC, and Sequedex, LLC. In the complaint, we alleged that defendant J. Peter Pierce, Sr., a former member of our Board of Directors and the former President of IMIM until his termination without cause effective June 30, 2000, violated his fiduciary obligations, as well as various noncompetition and other provisions of an employment agreement with Iron Mountain, dated February 1, 2000, by providing direct and/or indirect financial, management and other support to defendant Sequedex. Sequedex was established in October 2000, and competed directly with us in the records information management services industry. The complaint also alleged that Mr. Pierce and certain of the other defendants, who were employed by or affiliated with Pierce Leahy Corp. prior to the merger of Pierce Leahy with Iron Mountain in February 2000, misappropriated and used our trade secrets and other confidential information. Finally, the complaint asserted claims against Sequedex and others for tortious interference with contractual relations, against all of the defendants for civil conspiracy in respect of the matters described above, and against defendant Michael DiIanni for breach of his employment agreement with IMIM, dated September 6, 2000. The litigation seeks injunctions in respect of certain matters and recovery of damages against the defendants.

        On April 12, 2002, Iron Mountain also initiated a related arbitration proceeding against Mr. Pierce before the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Office of the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA") pursuant to an arbitration clause in the employment agreement between Iron Mountain and Mr. Pierce. In the arbitration, Mr. Pierce counterclaimed for indemnification of his expenses, including attorneys' fees. We disputed Mr. Pierce's claim. On July 19, 2002, the litigation was stayed pending the outcome of the arbitration proceeding. On February 25, 2003, in response to Iron Mountain's request, the AAA removed the arbitrator. The arbitration proceeding was transferred by agreement of the parties to ADR Options, Inc. On February 4, 2004, the arbitrator rendered a decision. The arbitrator did not find the evidence provided by us in our action against Mr. Pierce sufficient to rule in our favor on the particular claims at issue. In addition, the arbitrator ruled that, pursuant to an indemnification provision in Mr. Pierce's employment agreement, we must pay Mr. Pierce's attorneys fees and costs that are attributable to this single arbitration. The arbitrator has established a procedure to ascertain the amount of these fees and expenses, which, in any case are not expected to be material to our financial position or results of operations. We have recently filed a motion to vacate the arbitrator's decision and award in Middlesex County, New Jersey, where the pending action against Mr. Pierce and others is currently stayed.

        On December 16, 2002, Hartford Windsor Associates, L.P. ("H-W Associates"), Hartford General, LLC, J. Anthony Hayden, Mr. Pierce, Frank Seidman and John H. Greenwald, Jr. commenced an action in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, against Iron Mountain Incorporated. In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that H-W Associates purchased a warehouse property in Connecticut to serve as a records storage facility, and entered into a lease for the facility with Sequedex, then a competitor of ours, and that the remaining plaintiffs were limited or general partners of H-W Associates. The plaintiffs also allege that we tortiously interfered with Sequedex's contractual relations with an actual or prospective customer of Sequedex and, as a result, caused Sequedex to default on its lease to H-W Associates. The complaint seeks damages in excess of $100,000. We have denied the material allegations in the complaint filed against us by H-W Associates and the other plaintiffs and have since filed counterclaims against the plaintiffs alleging tortious

13

interference with our business relationship with one of our longstanding customers. Discovery is proceeding.

        Also on December 16, 2002, Pioneer Capital L.P. ("Pioneer"), Pioneer Capital Genpar, Inc. ("PCG"), the general partner of Pioneer, and Mr. Pierce, the President of PCG, commenced an action in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, against Iron Mountain Incorporated, C. Richard Reese, John F. Kenny, Jr., Garry Watzke, Schooner Capital LLC ("Schooner") and Vincent J. Ryan. The named individuals are Directors and/or officers of Iron Mountain and Schooner is a shareholder of Iron Mountain. In the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants had numerous conversations and arrangements with Mr. Carr, one of Mr. Pierce's and Pioneer's business partners in a company named Logisteq LLC. The plaintiffs further allege that, as a result of such conversations and arrangements, defendants conspired to, and did intentionally, interfere with Pioneer's relationship with its partner and Logisteq. The plaintiffs also allege that defendants damaged Mr. Pierce's reputation in the community by telling Iron Mountain employees and other third parties that Mr. Pierce breached his employment agreement with Iron Mountain, misappropriated and used Iron Mountain's confidential information, breached his fiduciary duties to Iron Mountain's shareholders and assisted Sequedex, then a competitor of Iron Mountain, in unfairly competing with Iron Mountain. Finally, the complaint alleges that the business partner in Logisteq taped conversations with Mr. Pierce and others which allegedly violated privacy laws, that the defendants knew, or should have known, that the tapes were being made without the consent of the individuals and, as a result, Mr. Pierce was harmed. The complaint seeks damages in excess of $5,000,000. Iron Mountain and the other defendants have challenged the legal sufficiency of the plaintiffs' pleadings in each of these cases.

        On September 10, 2003, IMIM filed a complaint in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania in a matter related to the litigation between the Company and Sequedex, Mr. Pierce and others disclosed above. The new matter names Sequedex, J. Michael Gold and Peter Hamilton as defendants, and alleges that in 2000 defendants Gold and Hamilton, both former IMIM employees, used confidential and proprietary business information that they had obtained while employed by IMIM to form their own records management company, Sequedex. The complaint also alleges unlawful interference with IMIM's contractual relationship with a certain customer and other matters. The defendants filed preliminary objections to our complaint and Iron Mountain has answered those preliminary objections.

        Prior to the litigation directly pertaining to Mr. Pierce having been filed, in approximately October 2000, three former management employees of IMIM became employed by or otherwise associated with Sequedex. IMIM commenced actions against these three former employees to enforce its rights under their confidentiality and non-competition agreements. IMIM has also asserted claims against Sequedex for tortious interference with these agreements, and against both Sequedex and the former employees for misappropriation and use of IMIM's trade secrets and confidential information.

        The defendants in all three cases have denied the material allegations in IMIM's complaints and asserted various affirmative defenses. In addition, Sequedex and the individual defendants filed counterclaims against IMIM and third party complaints against Iron Mountain. The counterclaims and third party complaints assert claims for tortious interference with certain contracts and prospective business relations between Sequedex and its current and potential customers as well as a claim for trade disparagement and defamation. The defendant in one of these actions sought a declaratory judgment regarding the enforceability of the confidentiality and non-competition agreements at issue in that case and filed a motion for summary judgment seeking to have the non-competition agreement declared void, or to limit its scope. IMIM and Iron Mountain filed motions in all three cases to dismiss the various counterclaims and third-party complaints. All of these motions, i.e., the defendants' motion for summary judgment and IMIM's and Iron Mountain's motions to dismiss, were denied by the court following a hearing on May 7, 2002. As previously disclosed in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, Sequedex furnished a preliminary statement of damages with an

14

estimate of compensatory damages of approximately $172 million and an indication that Sequedex intended to seek punitive damages of approximately $1.5 billion. Sequedex is no longer seeking damages in this amount and in connection with its proposed amended counterclaim, Sequedex has recently furnished a litigation expert's report of damages claiming approximately $59 million plus approximately $6.6 million of pre-judgment interest. Sequedex has indicated that it also intends to seek punitive damages in an undisclosed amount. Extensive discovery has been conducted in the three cases and is ongoing; on the basis of that discovery, it is our belief that Sequedex has not produced any material evidence that we or IMIM acted wrongfully in any respect. Further, limited discovery has been conducted in respect of Sequedex's damages claim; on the basis of that discovery, we do not believe that Sequedex has any foundation, and we believe that it cannot provide any foundation, for its damages calculations. We believe that the damages calculations submitted by Sequedex are not supported by credible evidence and are subject to serious legal, methodological and factual deficiencies. A trial of the three actions in which the Sequedex counterclaims and third party complaints have been asserted is scheduled to commence in April of 2004. IMIM, Sequedex and one of the individual defendants recently filed dispositive motions, including motions for summary judgment as to certain of the claims. All of these motions were denied by the court following a hearing on February 24, 2004.

        Discovery is proceeding in each of these cases, other than the arbitration. We intend to prosecute these actions vigorously, as well as to defend ourselves vigorously against the counterclaims and the third party complaints.

South Brunswick Fires Litigation

        In March 1997, we experienced three fires, all of which authorities have determined were caused by arson. The fires resulted in damage to one and destruction of another records and information management services facility in South Brunswick Township, New Jersey.

        Certain of our customers or their insurance carriers have asserted claims as a consequence of the destruction of, or damage to, their records as a result of the fires, including claims with specific requests for compensation and allegations of negligence or other culpability on the part of Iron Mountain. We and our insurers have denied any liability on the part of Iron Mountain as to all of these claims.

        We are presently aware of five pending lawsuits that have been filed against Iron Mountain by certain of our customers and/or their insurers, and one pending lawsuit filed by the insurers of an abutter of one of the South Brunswick facilities. Five of these six lawsuits have been consolidated for pre-trial purposes in the Middlesex County, New Jersey, Superior Court. The sixth lawsuit, brought by a single customer, is pending in the Supreme Court for New York County, New York. A seventh lawsuit, also brought by a single customer, was tried before a federal judge in New Jersey in February 2000, with a defendant's verdict entered in favor of Iron Mountain. An eighth lawsuit filed by an injured firefighter is currently being settled by our insurer for a nominal amount. Several other claims that were originally filed in relation to these lawsuits have been voluntarily dismissed without prejudice by the customers, abutting business owners, and/or their insurance carriers.

        We have denied liability and asserted affirmative defenses in all of the remaining cases arising out of the fires and, in certain of the cases, have asserted counterclaims for indemnification against the plaintiffs. Discovery is ongoing. We deny any liability as a result of the destruction of, or damage to, customer records or property of abutters as a result of the fires, which were beyond our control. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these and any other lawsuits that may arise.

        Our professional liability insurer, together with our general liability and property insurance carriers, have entered into a binding agreement with us regarding reimbursement of defense costs and have agreed to ongoing discussions regarding any remaining coverage issues, further defense and/or settlement of these claims.

15

General

        In addition to the matters discussed above, we are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business with a portion of the defense and/or settlement costs being covered by various commercial liability insurance policies purchased by us. In the opinion of management, no other material legal proceedings are pending to which we, or any of our properties, are subject.

        The outcome of the South Brunswick fires, Sequedex, H-W Associates, Pioneer and Pierce proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Based on our present assessment of the situation, after consultation with legal counsel, management does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, although there can be no assurance in this regard.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

        There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders of Iron Mountain during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

16

PART II

Item 5.    Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters.

        Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "IRM." The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices on the NYSE, for the years 2002 and 2003:

        The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on March 1, 2004 was $45.23. As of March 1, 2004, there were 576 holders of record of our common stock. We believe that there are more than 15,000 beneficial owners of our common stock.

        We have not paid dividends on our common stock during the last two years. Any determinations by our Board to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be based primarily upon our financial condition, results of operations and business requirements. Our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 15, 2002 (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement") contains provisions that limit the amount of cash dividends we may pay and stock repurchases that we may make.

Item 6.    Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Information.Data.

        The following selected consolidated statements of operations, balance sheet and other data have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected consolidated financial and operating information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing.

1317

Reconciliation of (Loss) Income from Continuing Operations
before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of
Change in Accounting Principle to EBITDA:

(footnotes follow)

1418

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net (Loss) Income:

(footnotes follow)

19

(1)

Previously, certain product revenues related to our off-site data protection segment were recorded net of product costs. During the fourth quarter of 2002, we determined that it was more appropriate to record these revenues and costs on the gross rather than the net basis. As a result, service and storage material sales revenues and cost of sales in the above table have increased by $15,960, $11,840, $17,794, $14,602 and $17,749 for the years ending December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Gross profit, operating income, net income (loss), EBITDA and cash flows were not impacted by this change.

(2)

On February 1, 2000, we completed a merger with Pierce Leahy in a transaction valued at approximately $1,036,000. The results of the Pierce Leahy merger are reflected in the table above beginning with 11 months of activity in 2000. In addition, we recorded specific charges associated with the integration of the operations of Pierce Leahy in 2000, 2001 and 2002 within merger related expenses and recorded non-cash stock option compensation expense as a result of the Pierce Leahy acquisition in 2000. This merger has impactedimpacts the comparability of results before and after the merger. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

(3)(2)

Effective January 1, 2002, we ceased amortizing our goodwill balance in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." The accounting change will impactimpacts the comparability of results to previous years. See Note 2(g) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)(3)

We believe that EBITDA (earningsOIBDA is defined as operating income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. For a more detailed definition and reconciliation of OIBDA and a discussion of why we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors, because it is an important financial measure used in evaluating our performance, as EBITDA is an internally generated source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Externally, holders of our publicly issued debt use EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as important criteria for evaluating us and, as a result, all of our bond indentures and covenants include EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of financial performance. However, EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and you should not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for operating or net income (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP) as indicators of our performance or for cash flow from operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. Seesee Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for discussions of other measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP and our sources and applications of cash flow.Operations—Non-GAAP Measures."

(5)(4)

We reported a loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001. We would have needed to generate for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 additional income from operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest of $18,032$23,291 and $8,131,$28,111, respectively, to cover our fixed charges of $154,975 and $177,032, respectively.

1520

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

        The following discussion should be read in conjunction with "Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Information"Data" and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and the other financial and operating information included elsewhere in this filing.

        ��   This discussion contains "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and in other federal securities laws. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" on page ii of this filing.

Overview

        Our revenues consist of storage revenues as well as service and storage material sales revenues. Storage revenues, which are considered a key performance indicator for the records and information management services industry, consist of largely recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials (either on a per unit or per cubic foot of records basis), which are typically retained by customers for many years, and have accounted for approximately 58% of total consolidated revenues in each of the last five years. Our quarterly revenues from these fixed periodic storage fees have grown for 60 consecutive quarters. In certain circumstances, based upon customer requirements, storage revenues include periodic charges associated with normal, recurring service activities. Service and storage material sales revenues are comprised of charges for related service activities and courier operations and the sale of storage materials. Related service revenues arise from additions of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destructions of records, permanent withdrawals from storage and other complementary and ancillary services, and sales of specially designed storage containers, magnetic media including computer tapes and related supplies. Courier operations consist primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request. Customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms. Our consolidated revenues are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency translation on revenue derived from outside the U.S. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, we derived 19.0% and 14.0%, respectively, of our total revenues from outside the U.S. We expect the percentage of total revenues that we derive from outside the U.S. to increase in 2004 due to our acquisition of the European operations of Hays IMS.

        Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists primarily of wages and benefits for field personnel, facility occupancy costs including rent and utilities, transportation expenses including vehicle leases and fuel, other product cost of sales and other equipment costs and supplies. Of these, wages and benefits and facility occupancy costs are the most significant. Trends in total wages and benefits dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance and workers compensation. Trends in facility occupancy costs are similarly impacted by the total number of facilities we occupy, the mix of properties we own versus properties we occupy under operating leases, fluctuations in per square foot occupancy costs, and the levels of utilization of these properties.

        The expansion of our European and secure shredding operations have resulted in changes to the mix of certain cost of sales components. We expect that until we complete the integration of the European operations of Hays IMS, rationalize our European facilities and maximize their utilization, our facilities costs may increase as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as our European operations become a greater percentage of our consolidated results. Our European and secure shredding operations are more labor intensive; therefore, our labor expense will be higher as a percentage of revenue as compared to our mature operations. In addition, our secure shredding operations incur higher transportation costs and lower facility costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as compared to our mature operations.

21

        Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for management, administrative, information technology, sales, account management and marketing personnel, as well as expenses related to communications and data processing, travel, professional fees, bad debts, training, office equipment and supplies. Trends in total wages and benefits dollars and as a percentage of total consolidated revenue are influenced by changes in headcount and compensation levels, achievement of incentive compensation targets, workforce productivity and variability in costs associated with medical insurance. We expect our adoption of the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure," will result in increasing amounts of selling, general and administrative expenses in the future. We began using the fair value method of accounting in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2003 using the prospective method. The prospective method involves recognizing expense for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter with no expense recognition for previous awards. As we continue to grant new options subject to these standards and amortize compensation expense associated with options granted after January 1, 2003, we expect our stock compensation expense will grow significantly over the $1.5 million we recorded for such expense in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003. It is not possible to predict the increase in stock compensation expense for 2004 as it is dependent upon the number of options that will be granted throughout 2004 and the valuation assumptions in use at the time those options are granted. The overhead structure of our expanding European operations, as compared to our mature operations, is more labor intensive and has not achieved the same level of overhead leverage, which may result in an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenue, as our European operations become a more meaningful percentage of our consolidated results.

        Our depreciation and amortization charges result primarily from the capital-intensive nature of our business. The principal components of depreciation relate to storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings. Amortization relates primarily to customer relationships and acquisition costs.

        Effective July 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Had SFAS No. 142 been effective January 1, 2001, goodwill amortization expense would have been reduced by $59.2 million ($50.9 million, net of tax) for the year ended December 31, 2001. See Note 2(g) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In February 2004, we completed the acquisition of Mentmore plc's 49.9% equity interest in IME. This transaction should have no impact on revenue or operating income since we already fully consolidate IME's financial results. Since we will be using the purchase method of accounting for this acquisition, 49.9% of the net assets of IME will be adjusted to reflect their fair market value if different from their current carrying value. As a result, we expect this transaction will increase depreciation and amortization expenses going forward. Additionally, we will record an increase in interest expense, net associated with debt used to fund this acquisition and will no longer record the minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries, net related to Mentmore's ownership interest in IME.

        All of our costs are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency translation on costs incurred by our entities outside the U.S. During 2003, we have seen increases in costs as a result of the strengthening of the British pound sterling, the Euro, and the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. It is impossible to predict how much foreign currency exchange rates will fluctuate in the future and how those

22

fluctuations will impact individual balances reported in our consolidated statement of operations; however, given the relative increase in our international operations, these fluctuations may become material.

Reclassifications and Changes in Presentation

        Previously, consolidated losses (gains) on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net were recorded within various captions of our consolidated statements of operations based on the nature of the underlying asset. During the first quarter of 2003, we determined that it was more appropriate to record these gains and losses separately within our results from operations. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations.

        Previously, debt extinguishment expenses were recorded as an extraordinary charge within our consolidated statements of operations. Effective January 1, 2003, we have reflected these charges to other (income) expense, net in accordance with recent changes in accounting pronouncements. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations.

Non-GAAP Measures

Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA

        OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. Our management uses these measures to evaluate the operating performance of our consolidated business. As such, we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors. We use OIBDA for planning purposes and multiples of current or projected OIBDA-based calculations in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe OIBDA and OIBDA Margin are useful measures to evaluate our ability to grow our revenues faster than our operating expenses and they are an integral part of our internal reporting system utilized by management to assess and evaluate the operating performance of our business. OIBDA does not include certain items, specifically (1) minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries, net, (2) other (income) expense, net, (3) income from discontinued operations and loss on sale of discontinued operations and (4) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results. OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net and the provision for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which management does not consider when evaluating the profitability of our core operations. Finally, OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses, in order to eliminate the impact of capital investments, which management believes is better evaluated by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. OIBDA and OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America, or GAAP, such as operating or net income or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

23

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net (Loss) Income (In Thousands):

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments of tangible and intangible assets, income taxes, purchase accounting related reserves, self-insurance liabilities, incentive compensation liabilities, litigation liabilities and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. We use these estimates to assist us in the identification and assessment of the accounting treatment necessary with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following and are in no particular order:

Accounting for Acquisitions

        Part of our growth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to revisions as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

        Each acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting as defined under the applicable accounting standards at the date of each acquisition, including, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, "Accounting for Business Combinations," and more recently, SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations."141. Accounting for these acquisitions has resulted in the capitalization of the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets acquired in each of these acquisitions as goodwill. We estimated the fair values of the assets acquired in each acquisition as of the date of acquisition and these estimates are subject to adjustment. These estimates are subject to final assessments of the fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, operating leases and deferred income taxes. We complete these assessments within one year of the date of acquisition. We are not aware of any information that would

24

indicate that the final purchase price allocations for acquisitions completed in 20022003 would differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. See Note 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In connection with each of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our restructuring activities include the elimination of duplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire. The estimated cost of these restructuring activities are included as costs of the acquisition and are recorded as goodwill consistent with the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in

16

Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." While we finalize our plans to restructure the businesses we acquire within one year of the date of acquisition, it may take more than one year to complete all activities related to the restructuring of an acquired business.

        Our acquisitions have resulted in a significant accumulation of goodwill, which for acquisitions prior to July 1, 2001, we amortized over an estimated benefit period of 20 to 30 years. We have not amortized any goodwill for our acquisitions completed after July 1, 2001 and, beginninggoodwill. Beginning on January 1, 2002, we ceased to amortize any goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142. Through December 31, 2001, we reviewed our existing goodwill for impairment, consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" and determined that no amounts of goodwill were impaired using the undiscounted future cash flow methodology of SFAS No. 121. Effective January 1, 2002, weWe reviewed goodwill for impairment consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 142 using a discounted future cash flow approach.approach to approximate fair value. The result of testing our goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of January 1, 2002, was a non-cash charge of $6.4 million (net of minority interest of $8.5 million), which, consistent with SFAS No. 142, is reported in the caption "cumulative effect of change in accounting principle" in our consolidated statement of operations. Impairment adjustments recognized in the future, if any, are generally required to be recognized as operating expenses. The $6.4 million charge relates to our South American reporting unit within our international reporting segment. The South American reporting unit failed the impairment test primarily due to a reduction in the expected future performance of the unit resulting from a deterioration of the local economic environment and the devaluation of the currency in Argentina. As goodwill amortization expense in our South American reporting unit is not deductible for tax purposes, this impairment charge is not net of a tax benefit. We have a controlling 50.1% interest in Iron Mountain South America, Ltd ("IMSA") and the remainder is owned by an unaffiliated entity. IMSA has acquired a controlling interest in entities in which local partners have retained a minority interest in order to enhance our local market expertise. These local partners have no ownership interest in IMSA. This has caused the minority interest portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($8.5 million) to exceed our portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($6.4 million). In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 20022003 and noted no impairment of goodwill at our reporting units as of that date. As of December 31, 2002,2003, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. As of December 31, 2002 and 2003, our allowance for doubtful accounts balance totaled $20.3 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2003 compared to December 31, 2002 is primarily attributable to the success of our centralized collection efforts within the U.S. and Canada, which resulted in improved cash collections and an improved accounts receivable aging that enabled us to significantly reduce our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts was partially offset by an increase in the

1725

allowance for doubtful accounts associated with businesses acquired during the year ended December 31, 2003, including Hays IMS.

Accounting for Variable Interest Entities

        Under our three synthetic lease facilities, three special purpose entities, which we now refer to asThree variable interest entities were established to acquire properties and lease those properties to us. These leases were designed to qualify as operating leases for accounting purposes, where the monthly lease expense was recorded as rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations and where the related underlying assets and liabilities were not consolidated in our consolidated balance sheets. As described below, weWe changed the characterization and the related accounting for properties in one variable interest entity ("VIE III") during the third quarter of 2002 and prospectively for new property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002. In addition, anticipating the requirement to consolidate, and in line with our objective of transparent reporting, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III and our two other variable interest entities (together, the "Other Variable Interest Entities" and, collectively with VIE III, our "Variable Interest Entities") as of December 31, 2002. These guarantees resulted in our consolidating all of our Variable Interest Entities' assets and liabilities.

        Synthetic lease facilities require the application of complex lease and variable interest entity accounting rules and interpretations. In the course of applying these complex accounting rules and interpretations, we have made certain judgments, estimates and assumptions relative to their treatment. We entered into these synthetic lease facilities because we believe they afforded, and continue to afford, meaningful benefits. Such benefits included rental payments (prospectively interest payments) below those available from traditional landlords and developers, and tax benefits and control provisions normally associated with direct ownership, including the right to buy the properties at original cost.    Each of the leases under our synthetic lease facilities has a five to six and one-half year term for specified records storage warehouses; commencement dates for these leases range from 1998 to 2002.

Our Variable Interest Entities were financed with real estate term loans. These real estate term loans have always been and continue to be treated as indebtedness for purposes of our financial covenants under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. As of the date they were consolidated into our financial statements, they were also considered indebtedness under our Indenturesindentures for certain of our Senior Subordinated Notes and our Subsidiarysenior subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2002,2003, these real estate term loans amounted to $202.6 million. No further financing is currently available to our Variable Interest Entities to fund further property acquisitions. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In light of the impending changes in the accounting rules related to off-balance sheet treatment of variable interest entities, which became final subsequent to December 31, 2002 as discussed below, management undertook an internal review of our Variable Interest Entities during the third quarter of 2002 in order to determine the future treatment of these transactions. During this review, management determined that VIE III should not have qualified for off-balance sheet treatment due to a technical documentation error. VIE III was involved in a series of construction projects and other facility acquisitions that were initiated from mid 2001 through December 31, 2002. As a result, management changed the characterization and the related accounting for properties in VIE III during the third quarter of 2002 and prospectively for new property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002 to record these properties and their related financing obligations in our consolidated results. New property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002 totaled $10.4 million.

        Also, as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III. This resulted in our consolidating all of its remaining assets and liabilities. VIE III's remaining assets and liabilities relate to an interest rate swap agreement, which it entered into upon its inception. This swap agreement hedges the majority of interest rate risk associated with VIE III's real estate term loans. Specifically, VIE III has swapped $97.0 million of floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Since the time it entered into the swap agreement, interest rates have fallen. As a result, the estimated fair value of the derivative liability held by VIE III, and now consolidated on our balance sheet, related to the swap agreement was $13.7$11.0 million at December 31, 2002.2003. This swap has been since inception and continues

18

to be, as of December 31, 2002,2003, an effective hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities."

        As of During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, associated with the total impact related to the change in characterization and the consolidation of VIE III, as compared to December 31, 2001, was an increase in gross property, plant and equipment, accumulated depreciation, long-term debt,properties and interest expense of $98.7 million, $1.7 million, $98.7$6.2 million and $6.2 million, respectively. Additionally, we have recorded an additional derivative liability and deferred tax assets of $13.7 million and $5.0$8.2 million, respectively, and a charge to shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive items of $8.7 million as of December 31, 2002.associated with the real estate term loans. See Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In addition, as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in the Other Variable Interest Entities. This resulted in our consolidating all of their assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2002, the total impact of consolidating the Other Variable Interest Entities was an increase of $103.9 million both in property, plant and equipment and long-term debt. The underlying leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities were treated as operating leases from inception (as early as 1998) through consolidation on December 31, 2002. As a result, during the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, we recorded $4.8 million, $6.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, in rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations related to these leases. On a prospective basis,In 2003, we will bebegan recording depreciation expense associated with the properties, interest expense associated with the real estate term loans and will no longer have rent expense related to leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities in our consolidated financial results. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $2.0 million associated with the properties and interest expense of $5.5 million associated with the real estate term loans. If the Other Variable Interest Entities had been consolidated in our historical financial statements as of January 1, 2002: (1) depreciation expense would

26

have increased in an amount equal to $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002; and (2) rent expense for these properties would have been reclassified as interest expense in an amount equal to $5.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Consequently, our EBITDA,OIBDA, operating income and interest expense would have increased by $5.9 million, $3.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. In addition, net income before provision for income taxes would have decreased by $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.

        In January and December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46") and No. 46, revised ("FIN 46R"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,Entities." These statements, which addressesaddress perceived weaknesses in accounting for entities commonly known as special-purpose or off-balance-sheet, require consolidation of certain interests or arrangements by virtue of holding a controlling financial interest in such entities. Certain provisions of FIN 46R related to interests in special purpose entities were applicable for the financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities.period ended December 31, 2003. We must apply FIN 46 addresses both unconsolidated46R to our interests in all entities subject to the interpretation as of the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004. Adoption of this new method of accounting for variable interest entities did not and any new variable interest entities that are created subsequentis not expected to the issuancehave a material impact on our consolidated results of the interpretation.operations and financial position. As a result of the actions described above, as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, we did not have any unconsolidated variable interest entities. Any future variable interest entities will be accounted for in accordance with FIN 46.

Accounting for Derivative InstrumentsReclassifications and Hedging ActivitiesChanges in Presentation

        SFAS No. 133 establishes accountingPreviously, consolidated losses (gains) on disposal/writedown of property, plant and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on its balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (1) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment; (2) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction; or (3) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of aequipment, net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated forecasted transaction. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and resulting designation. Unrealized and realized gains and losses are recognized each period as other comprehensive income which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items included in

19

shareholders' equity, assets and liabilities or earnings depending on the nature of such derivatives. See Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed descriptionwere recorded within various captions of our derivative instruments.

        In order for a derivative contract to be designated as a hedge, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item or transaction must be highly effective. The effectiveness test is performed at the inceptionconsolidated statements of the hedge and each reporting period thereafter, throughout the period that the hedge is designated. Any amounts determined to be ineffective are recorded currently in earnings.

        For fair value hedges, the gains and losses are recorded in earnings each period along with the change in the fair value of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the gains and losses are recorded to other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings concurrent with the disposition of the hedged risks. For hedges of foreign currency the accounting treatment generally follows the treatment for cash flow hedges or fair value hedges dependingoperations based on the nature of the foreign currency hedge.

        Although we apply some judgment inunderlying asset. During the assessmentfirst quarter of hedge effectiveness to designate certain derivatives as hedges, the nature of the contracts used to hedge the underlying risks is such that the correlation of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and underlying risks is generally high. We had $35.3 million of interest rate risk management liabilities and had a corresponding amount for unrealized losses to other comprehensive income ($22.5 million, net of tax) related to cash flow hedges at December 31, 2002.

        One of our interest rate swaps was used to hedge interest rate risk on certain variable operating lease commitments. As a result of the December 31, 2002 consolidation of one of the Other Variable Interest Entities ("VIE I"), the operating lease commitments that were hedged by this swap are now considered to be inter-company transactions and2003, we determined that this hedgeit was no longer effective on a prospective basis.more appropriate to record these gains and losses separately within our results from operations. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations.

        Previously, debt extinguishment expenses were recorded as an extraordinary charge within our consolidated the real estate term loansstatements of VIE I andoperations. Effective January 1, 2003, we will prospectively record interest expense instead of rent expense as we make cash interest payments on this debt. The unrealized markhave reflected these charges to market losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income attributable to this swap ($1.9 million, net of tax, as of December 31, 2002) will be amortized through other (income) expense, net in accordance with recent changes in accounting pronouncements. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations.

Non-GAAP Measures

Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA

        OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. Our management uses these measures to evaluate the operating performance of our consolidated statementbusiness. As such, we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors. We use OIBDA for planning purposes and multiples of operations based oncurrent or projected OIBDA-based calculations in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe OIBDA and OIBDA Margin are useful measures to evaluate our ability to grow our revenues faster than our operating expenses and they are an integral part of our internal reporting system utilized by management to assess and evaluate the changesoperating performance of our business. OIBDA does not include certain items, specifically (1) minority interest in the fair valueearnings (losses) of the swap each period that the remaining interest payments are made on VIE I's external debt. We will prospectively account for mark to market changes in the derivative liability of this swap agreement throughsubsidiaries, net, (2) other (income) expense, net, (3) income from discontinued operations and loss on sale of discontinued operations and (4) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle that we believe are not indicative of our consolidated statement of operations. This accounting will have acore operating results. OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net zero impact within our consolidated statement of operations as it relates to the amortization of unrealized mark to market losses and the fair valuingprovision for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which management does not consider when evaluating the profitability of our core operations. Finally, OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses, in order to eliminate the derivative liability.

Accountingimpact of capital investments, which management believes is better evaluated by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. OIBDA and OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, Internal Use Software

        We develop various software applications for internal use. We account for those costsother measures of financial performance reported in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs associated with internal use software to be expensed as incurred until certain capitalization criteria are met. SOP 98-1 also defines which types of costs should be capitalized and which should be expensed. Payroll and related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, the development of internal use computer software projects, to the extent time is spent directly on the project, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalization begins when the design stage of the application has been completed and it is probable that the project will be completed and used to perform the function intended. Depreciation begins when the software is placed in service. Computer software costs that are capitalized are evaluated for

20

impairment in accordance with SFAS No.144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."

        It may be necessary for us to write-off amounts associated with the development of internal use software if the project cannot be completed as intended. Our expansion into new technology-based service offerings requires the development of internal use software that will be susceptible to rapid and significant changes in technology. We may be required to write-off unamortized costs or shorten the estimated useful life if an internal use software program is replaced with an alternative tool prior to the end of the software's estimated useful life. General uncertainties related to expansion into digital businesses, including the timing of introduction and market acceptance of our services, may adversely impact the recoverability of these assets. See Note 2(f) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        During the year ended December 31, 2002, we replaced one of our internal use software programs, which resultedaccounting principles generally accepted in the write-off to other (income) expense, netUnites States of the remaining net book value of $1.1 million.

Deferred Income Taxes

        We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered estimated future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount needed for the valuation allowance. If actual results differ unfavorably from those estimates used, we may not be able to realize allAmerica, or part of our net deferred tax assets and additional valuation allowances may be required.

Overview

        Our primary financial goal has always been, and continues to be, to increase consolidated EBITDA in relation to capital invested, evenGAAP, such as our focus has shifted from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. EBITDA is a source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. In addition, substantially all of our financing agreements contain covenants in which EBITDA-based calculations are used as a measure of financial performance for financial ratio purposes. EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations are used by the holders of our publicly issued debt as important criteria for evaluating our business and, as a result, all of our bond indentures contain covenants in which EBITDA-based calculations are used as the primary measure of financial performance. However, you should not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for operating or net income or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

23

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net (Loss) Income (In Thousands):

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or GAAP) as indicatorsof America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments of tangible and intangible assets, income taxes, purchase accounting related reserves, self-insurance liabilities, incentive compensation liabilities, litigation liabilities and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. We use these estimates to assist us in the identification and assessment of the accounting treatment necessary with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following and are in no particular order:

Accounting for Acquisitions

        Part of our performance or for cash flow from operations (asgrowth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined in accordance with GAAP)after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to revisions as a measure of our liquidity.we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

        Effective July 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to beEach acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method. Undermethod of accounting as defined under the applicable accounting standards at the date of each acquisition, including, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, "Accounting for Business Combinations," and more recently, SFAS No. 142, goodwill141. Accounting for these acquisitions has resulted in the capitalization of the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets acquired in each of these acquisitions as goodwill. We estimated the fair values of the assets acquired in each acquisition as of the date of acquisition and these estimates are subject to adjustment. These estimates are subject to final assessments of the fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets thatoperating leases and deferred income taxes. We complete these assessments within one year of the date of acquisition. We are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Had SFAS No. 142 been effective January 1, 2000, goodwill amortization expenseaware of any information that would have been reduced by $53.4 million and $59.2 million ($44.8 million and $50.9 million, net of tax)

24

indicate that the final purchase price allocations for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.acquisitions completed in 2003 would differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. See Note 2(g)7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In connection with each of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our revenues consistrestructuring activities include the elimination of storage revenuesduplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire. The estimated cost of these restructuring activities are included as wellcosts of the acquisition and are recorded as service and storage material sales revenues. Storage revenues consistgoodwill consistent with the guidance of periodic chargesEmerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." While we finalize our plans to restructure the businesses we acquire within one year of the date of acquisition, it may take more than one year to complete all activities related to the storagerestructuring of materials (eitheran acquired business.

        Our acquisitions have resulted in a significant accumulation of goodwill. Beginning on January 1, 2002, we ceased to amortize goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We reviewed goodwill for impairment consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 142 using a perdiscounted future cash flow approach to approximate fair value. The result of testing our goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of January 1, 2002, was a non-cash charge of $6.4 million (net of minority interest of $8.5 million), which, consistent with SFAS No. 142, is reported in the caption "cumulative effect of change in accounting principle" in our consolidated statement of operations. Impairment adjustments recognized in the future, if any, are generally required to be recognized as operating expenses. The $6.4 million charge relates to our South American reporting unit or per cubic foot of records basis) and have accounted for approximately 58% of total consolidated revenueswithin our international reporting segment. The South American reporting unit failed the impairment test primarily due to a reduction in eachthe expected future performance of the last five years.unit resulting from a deterioration of the local economic environment and the devaluation of the currency in Argentina. As goodwill amortization expense in our South American reporting unit is not deductible for tax purposes, this impairment charge is not net of a tax benefit. We have a controlling 50.1% interest in Iron Mountain South America, Ltd ("IMSA") and the remainder is owned by an unaffiliated entity. IMSA has acquired a controlling interest in entities in which local partners have retained a minority interest in order to enhance our local market expertise. These local partners have no ownership interest in IMSA. This has caused the minority interest portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($8.5 million) to exceed our portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($6.4 million). In certainaccordance with SFAS No. 142, we selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2003 and noted no impairment of goodwill at our reporting units as of that date. As of December 31, 2003, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances based upon customer requirements, storage revenues include periodic charges associated with normal, recurring service activities. Serviceof individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. As of December 31, 2002 and 2003, our allowance for doubtful accounts balance totaled $20.3 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2003 compared to December 31, 2002 is primarily attributable to the success of our centralized collection efforts within the U.S. and Canada, which resulted in improved cash collections and an improved accounts receivable aging that enabled us to significantly reduce our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts was partially offset by an increase in the

2125

allowance for doubtful accounts associated with businesses acquired during the year ended December 31, 2003, including Hays IMS.

Accounting for Variable Interest Entities

        Three variable interest entities were established to acquire properties and storage material sales revenues are comprisedlease those properties to us. These leases were designed to qualify as operating leases for accounting purposes, where the monthly lease expense was recorded as rent expense in our consolidated statements of charges for related service activities and courier operations and where the salerelated underlying assets and liabilities were not consolidated in our consolidated balance sheets. We changed the characterization and the related accounting for properties in one variable interest entity ("VIE III") during the third quarter of storage materials. Related service revenues arise from additions2002 and prospectively for new property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of new records, temporary removal2002. In addition, anticipating the requirement to consolidate, and in line with our objective of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destructions of records, permanent withdrawals from storage and other complementary and auxiliary services, and sales of specially designed storage containers, magnetic media including computer tapes and related supplies. Courier operations consist primarilytransparent reporting, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the pickupat-risk equity in VIE III and deliveryour two other variable interest entities (together, the "Other Variable Interest Entities" and, collectively with VIE III, our "Variable Interest Entities") as of records upon customer request. Customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms.

        Cost of sales (excluding depreciation) consists primarily of wages and benefits for field personnel, facility occupancy costs including rent and utilities, transportation expenses including vehicle leases and fuel, other product cost of sales and other equipment costs and supplies. Of these, wages and benefits and facility occupancy costs are the most significant. The expansionDecember 31, 2002. These guarantees resulted in our consolidating all of our secure shredding operations hasVariable Interest Entities' assets and liabilities.

        Our Variable Interest Entities were financed with real estate term loans. These real estate term loans have always been and continue to be treated as indebtedness for purposes of our financial covenants under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. As of the date they were consolidated into our financial statements, they were also considered indebtedness under our indentures for certain of our senior subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2003, these real estate term loans amounted to $202.6 million. No further financing is currently available to our Variable Interest Entities to fund further property acquisitions. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        As of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III. This resulted in changesour consolidating all of its remaining assets and liabilities. VIE III's remaining assets and liabilities relate to an interest rate swap agreement, which it entered into upon its inception. This swap agreement hedges the majority of interest rate risk associated with VIE III's real estate term loans. Specifically, VIE III has swapped $97.0 million of floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Since the time it entered into the swap agreement, interest rates have fallen. As a result, the estimated fair value of the derivative liability held by VIE III, and now consolidated on our balance sheet, related to the mixswap agreement was $11.0 million at December 31, 2003. This swap has been since inception and continues to be, as of December 31, 2003, an effective hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, associated with the properties and interest expense of $6.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, associated with the real estate term loans. See Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In addition, as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in the Other Variable Interest Entities. This resulted in our consolidating all of their assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2002, the total impact of consolidating the Other Variable Interest Entities was an increase of $103.9 million both in property, plant and equipment and long-term debt. The underlying leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities were treated as operating leases from inception (as early as 1998) through consolidation on December 31, 2002. As a result, during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, we recorded $6.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, in rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations related to these leases. In 2003, we began recording depreciation expense associated with the properties, interest expense associated with the real estate term loans and no longer have rent expense related to leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities in our consolidated financial results. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $2.0 million associated with the properties and interest expense of $5.5 million associated with the real estate term loans. If the Other Variable Interest Entities had been consolidated in our historical financial statements as of January 1, 2002: (1) depreciation expense would

26

have increased in an amount equal to $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002; and (2) rent expense for these properties would have been reclassified as interest expense in an amount equal to $5.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Consequently, our OIBDA, operating income and interest expense would have increased by $5.9 million, $3.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. In addition, net income before provision for income taxes would have decreased by $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.

        In January and December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46") and No. 46, revised ("FIN 46R"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." These statements, which address perceived weaknesses in accounting for entities commonly known as special-purpose or off-balance-sheet, require consolidation of certain costinterests or arrangements by virtue of sales components. Our secure shredding operations are more labor intensive, therefore, our labor expense will be higher asholding a percentagecontrolling financial interest in such entities. Certain provisions of revenue as comparedFIN 46R related to interests in special purpose entities were applicable for the period ended December 31, 2003. We must apply FIN 46R to our traditional operations. In addition,interests in all entities subject to the interpretation as of the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004. Adoption of this new method of accounting for variable interest entities did not and is not expected to have a material impact on our secure shreddingconsolidated results of operations incur higher transportation costs and lower facility costs, respectively,financial position. As a result of the actions described above, as a percentage of revenue, as compared to our traditional operations.

        Selling, generalDecember 31, 2002 and administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for management, administrative, information technology, sales, account management and marketing personnel, as well as expenses related to communications and data processing, travel, professional fees, bad debts, training, office equipment and supplies.

        Our depreciation and amortization charges result primarily from the capital-intensive nature of our business. The principal components of depreciation relate to storage systems, which include racking, building improvements and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and new buildings. Amortization relates primarily to customer relationships and acquisition costs.December 31, 2003, we did not have any unconsolidated variable interest entities.

Reclassifications and Changes in Presentation

        Previously, certain product revenues related to our off-site data protection segmentconsolidated losses (gains) on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net were recorded netwithin various captions of product costs.our consolidated statements of operations based on the nature of the underlying asset. During the fourthfirst quarter of 2002,2003, we determined that it was more appropriate to record these revenuesgains and costs on the gross rather than net basis.losses separately within our results from operations. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations. Gross profit, operating income,

        Previously, debt extinguishment expenses were recorded as an extraordinary charge within our consolidated statements of operations. Effective January 1, 2003, we have reflected these charges to other (income) expense, net income (loss), EBITDA and cash flows were not impacted by this change.

in accordance with recent changes in accounting pronouncements. We have updated our presentation of segment results to report our operationsreflected this change in Canada, previously analyzed as part of our International segment, and now analyzed within the Business Records Management segment. Allall applicable tables and discussions have been updated to reflect this change infor all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations.

Non-GAAP Measures

Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA

        OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses. OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing OIBDA by total revenues. Our management uses these measures to evaluate the operating performance of our consolidated business. As such, we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors. We use OIBDA for planning purposes and multiples of current or projected OIBDA-based calculations in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe OIBDA and OIBDA Margin are useful measures to evaluate our ability to grow our revenues faster than our operating expenses and they are an integral part of our internal reporting system utilized by management to assess and evaluate the operating performance of our business. OIBDA does not include certain items, specifically (1) minority interest in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries, net, (2) other (income) expense, net, (3) income from discontinued operations and loss on sale of discontinued operations and (4) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results. OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net and the provision for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which management does not consider when evaluating the profitability of our core operations. Finally, OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses, in order to eliminate the impact of capital investments, which management believes is better evaluated by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. OIBDA and OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America, or GAAP, such as operating or net income or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP).

23

Reconciliation of OIBDA to Operating Income and Net (Loss) Income (In Thousands):

Critical Accounting Policies

        Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments of tangible and intangible assets, income taxes, purchase accounting related reserves, self-insurance liabilities, incentive compensation liabilities, litigation liabilities and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. We use these estimates to assist us in the identification and assessment of the accounting treatment necessary with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following and are in no particular order:

Accounting for Acquisitions

        Part of our growth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to revisions as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

        Each acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting as defined under the applicable accounting standards at the date of each acquisition, including, Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 16, "Accounting for Business Combinations," and more recently, SFAS No. 141. Accounting for these acquisitions has resulted in the capitalization of the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets acquired in each of these acquisitions as goodwill. We estimated the fair values of the assets acquired in each acquisition as of the date of acquisition and these estimates are subject to adjustment. These estimates are subject to final assessments of the fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, operating leases and deferred income taxes. We complete these assessments within one year of the date of acquisition. We are not aware of any information that would

24

indicate that the final purchase price allocations for acquisitions completed in 2003 would differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. See Note 127 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In connection with each of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our restructuring activities include the elimination of duplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire. The estimated cost of these restructuring activities are included as costs of the acquisition and are recorded as goodwill consistent with the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination." While we finalize our plans to restructure the businesses we acquire within one year of the date of acquisition, it may take more than one year to complete all activities related to the restructuring of an effortacquired business.

        Our acquisitions have resulted in a significant accumulation of goodwill. Beginning on January 1, 2002, we ceased to furtheramortize goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We reviewed goodwill for impairment consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 142 using a discounted future cash flow approach to approximate fair value. The result of testing our goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of January 1, 2002, was a non-cash charge of $6.4 million (net of minority interest of $8.5 million), which, consistent with SFAS No. 142, is reported in the caption "cumulative effect of change in accounting principle" in our consolidated statement of operations. Impairment adjustments recognized in the future, if any, are generally required to be recognized as operating expenses. The $6.4 million charge relates to our South American reporting unit within our international reporting segment. The South American reporting unit failed the impairment test primarily due to a reduction in the expected future performance of the unit resulting from a deterioration of the local economic environment and the devaluation of the currency in Argentina. As goodwill amortization expense in our South American reporting unit is not deductible for tax purposes, this impairment charge is not net of a tax benefit. We have a controlling 50.1% interest in Iron Mountain South America, Ltd ("IMSA") and the remainder is owned by an unaffiliated entity. IMSA has acquired a controlling interest in entities in which local partners have retained a minority interest in order to enhance our local market expertise. These local partners have no ownership interest in IMSA. This has caused the minority interest portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($8.5 million) to exceed our portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($6.4 million). In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2003 and noted no impairment of goodwill at our reporting units as of that date. As of December 31, 2003, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. As of December 31, 2002 and 2003, our allowance for doubtful accounts balance totaled $20.3 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2003 compared to December 31, 2002 is primarily attributable to the success of our centralized collection efforts within the U.S. and Canada, which resulted in improved cash collections and an improved accounts receivable aging that enabled us to significantly reduce our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in the allowance for doubtful accounts was partially offset by an increase in the

25

allowance for doubtful accounts associated with businesses acquired during the year ended December 31, 2003, including Hays IMS.

Accounting for Variable Interest Entities

        Three variable interest entities were established to acquire properties and lease those properties to us. These leases were designed to qualify as operating leases for accounting purposes, where the monthly lease expense was recorded as rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations and where the related underlying assets and liabilities were not consolidated in our consolidated balance sheets. We changed the characterization and the related accounting for properties in one variable interest entity ("VIE III") during the third quarter of 2002 and prospectively for new property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002. In addition, anticipating the requirement to consolidate, and in line with our objective of transparent reporting, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III and our discussiontwo other variable interest entities (together, the "Other Variable Interest Entities" and, collectively with VIE III, our "Variable Interest Entities") as of resultsDecember 31, 2002. These guarantees resulted in our consolidating all of our Variable Interest Entities' assets and liabilities.

        Our Variable Interest Entities were financed with real estate term loans. These real estate term loans have always been and continue to be treated as indebtedness for purposes of our financial covenants under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. As of the date they were consolidated into our financial statements, they were also considered indebtedness under our indentures for certain of our senior subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2003, these real estate term loans amounted to $202.6 million. No further financing is currently available to our Variable Interest Entities to fund further property acquisitions. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        As of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III. This resulted in our consolidating all of its remaining assets and liabilities. VIE III's remaining assets and liabilities relate to an interest rate swap agreement, which it entered into upon its inception. This swap agreement hedges the majority of interest rate risk associated with VIE III's real estate term loans. Specifically, VIE III has swapped $97.0 million of floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Since the time it entered into the swap agreement, interest rates have fallen. As a result, the estimated fair value of the derivative liability held by VIE III, and now consolidated on our balance sheet, related to the swap agreement was $11.0 million at December 31, 2003. This swap has been since inception and continues to be, as of December 31, 2003, an effective hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, associated with the properties and interest expense of $6.2 million and $8.2 million, respectively, associated with the real estate term loans. See Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        In addition, as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in the Other Variable Interest Entities. This resulted in our consolidating all of their assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2002, the total impact of consolidating the Other Variable Interest Entities was an increase of $103.9 million both in property, plant and equipment and long-term debt. The underlying leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities were treated as operating leases from inception (as early as 1998) through consolidation on December 31, 2002. As a result, during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, we recorded $6.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, in rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations related to these leases. In 2003, we began recording depreciation expense associated with the properties, interest expense associated with the real estate term loans and no longer have rent expense related to leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities in our consolidated financial results. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded depreciation expense of $2.0 million associated with the properties and interest expense of $5.5 million associated with the real estate term loans. If the Other Variable Interest Entities had been consolidated in our historical financial statements as of January 1, 2002: (1) depreciation expense would

26

have increased in an amount equal to $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002; and (2) rent expense for these properties would have been reclassified as interest expense in an amount equal to $5.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Consequently, our OIBDA, operating income and interest expense would have increased by $5.9 million, $3.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. In addition, net income before provision for income taxes would have decreased by $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.

        In January and December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46") and No. 46, revised ("FIN 46R"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." These statements, which address perceived weaknesses in accounting for entities commonly known as special-purpose or off-balance-sheet, require consolidation of certain interests or arrangements by virtue of holding a controlling financial interest in such entities. Certain provisions of FIN 46R related to interests in special purpose entities were applicable for the period ended December 31, 2003. We must apply FIN 46R to our interests in all entities subject to the interpretation as of the first interim or annual period ending after March 15, 2004. Adoption of this new method of accounting for variable interest entities did not and is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial position. As a result of the actions described above, as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, we did not have any unconsolidated variable interest entities.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

        SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on its balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (1) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment; (2) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction; or (3) a hedge of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated forecasted transaction. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and resulting designation. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized each period as other comprehensive income which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items included in shareholders' equity, assets and liabilities or earnings depending on the nature of such derivatives. See Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of our derivative instruments.

        In order for a derivative contract to be designated as a hedge, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item or transaction must be highly effective. The effectiveness test is performed at the inception of the hedge and each reporting period thereafter, throughout the period that the hedge is designated. Any amounts determined to be ineffective are recorded currently in earnings.

        For fair value hedges, the gains and losses are recorded in earnings each period along with the change in the fair value of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the gains and losses are recorded to other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings concurrent with the disposition of the hedged risks. For hedges of foreign currency the accounting treatment generally follows the treatment for cash flow hedges or fair value hedges depending on the nature of the foreign currency hedge.

        Although we apply some judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness to designate certain derivatives as hedges, the nature of the contracts used to hedge the underlying risks is such that the

27

correlation of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and underlying risks is generally high. We had $25.6 million of interest rate risk management liabilities and had a corresponding amount for unrealized losses to other comprehensive income ($16.2 million, net of tax) related to cash flow hedges at December 31, 2003.

        We provided the initial financing totaling 190.5 million British pounds sterling to IME, our European joint venture, for all of the consideration associated with the acquisition of the European operations of Hays IMS using cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We recorded a foreign currency gain of $27.8 million in other (income) expense, net for this intercompany balance for the year ended December 31, 2003. In order to minimize the foreign currency risk associated with providing IME with the consideration necessary for the acquisition of Hay IMS, we borrowed 80.0 million British pounds sterling under our revolving credit facility to create a natural hedge. We recorded a foreign currency loss of $11.5 million on the translation of this revolving credit balance to U.S. dollars in other (income) expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, we entered into two cross currency swaps with a combined notional value of 100.0 million British pounds sterling. These swaps each have a term of one year and at maturity we have a right to receive $162.8 million in exchange for 100.0 million British pounds sterling. We have not designated these swaps as hedges and, therefore, all mark to market fluctuations of the swaps are recorded in other (income) expense, net in our consolidated statements of operations. We have recorded, for the year ended December 31, 2003, a foreign currency loss of $19.0 million in other (income) expense, net.

        One of our interest rate swaps was used to hedge interest rate risk on certain variable operating lease commitments. As a result of the December 31, 2002 consolidation of one of the Other Variable Interest Entities ("VIE I"), the operating lease commitments that were hedged by this swap are now considered to be inter-company transactions and we determined that this hedge was no longer effective on a prospective basis. We have consolidated the real estate term loans of VIE I and we will prospectively record interest expense instead of rent expense as we make cash interest payments on this debt. The unrealized mark to market losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income attributable to this swap ($1.9 million and $0.8 million, net of tax, as of December 31, 2002 and 2003, respectively) will be amortized through other (income) expense, net in our consolidated statement of operations based on the changes in the fair value of the swap each period that the remaining interest payments are made on VIE I's external debt. We are accounting for mark to market changes in the derivative liability of this swap agreement through other (income) expense, net in our consolidated statement of operations. This accounting has a net zero impact within our consolidated statement of operations as it relates to the amortization of unrealized mark to market losses and the fair valuing of the derivative liability.

Accounting for Internal Use Software

        We develop various software applications for internal use. We account for those costs in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP") 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs associated with internal use software to be expensed as incurred until certain capitalization criteria are met. SOP 98-1 also defines which types of costs should be capitalized and which should be expensed. Payroll and related costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, the development of internal use computer software projects, to the extent time is spent directly on the project, are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalization begins when the design stage of the application has been expandedcompleted and it is probable that the project will be completed and used to perform the function intended. Depreciation begins when the software is placed in service. Computer software costs that are capitalized are evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No.144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."

28

        It may be necessary for us to write-off amounts associated with the development of internal use software if the project cannot be completed as intended. Our expansion into new technology-based service offerings requires the development of internal use software that will be susceptible to rapid and significant changes in technology. We may be required to write-off unamortized costs or shorten the estimated useful life if an internal use software program is replaced with an alternative tool prior to the end of the software's estimated useful life. General uncertainties related to expansion into digital businesses, including the timing of introduction and market acceptance of our services, may adversely impact the recoverability of these assets. See Note 2(f) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

        During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, we replaced internal use software programs, which resulted in the write-off to loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of the remaining net book value of $1.1 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Deferred Income Taxes

        We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered estimated future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount needed for the valuation allowance. If actual results differ unfavorably from those estimates used, we may not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets and additional valuation allowances may be required.

Stock-based Compensation

        As of January 1, 2003, we adopted the measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148. As a result we began using the fair value method of accounting in our financial statements beginning January 1, 2003 using the prospective method. The prospective method involves recognizing expense for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter with no expense recognition for previous awards. We will apply the fair value recognition provisions to all stock based awards granted, modified or settled on or after January 1, 2003 and will continue to provide whatthe required pro forma information for all awards previously granted, modified or settled before January 1, 2003 in our consolidated financial statements. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we believe is more meaningful detailrecorded $1.7 million of stock compensation expense in our consolidated statement of operations. Had we elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of all options as of their grant dates as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 and analysis. These periods represent the first two full yearsNo. 148, we would have recorded stock compensation expense of $4.9 million, $4.5 million and $5.6 million in our consolidated statements of operations subsequent tofor the merger with Pierce Leahy. As we have integrated Pierce Leahyyears ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and several other significant acquisitions we have improved our data collection systems, resulting in our ability to provide greater insight regarding our operations.2003, respectively.

2229

Results of Operations

        The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information derived from our consolidated statements of operations, expressed as a percentage of total consolidated revenues.

(1)

See "Non-GAAP Measures—Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA" for definition, reconciliation and a discussion of why we believe this measure provides relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors.

2330

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002 Consolidated Results (in thousands)

(1)

See "Non-GAAP Measures—Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or OIBDA" for definition, reconciliation and a discussion of why we believe these measures provide relevant and useful information to our current and potential investors.

31

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2003 to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Revenue

        Our consolidated storage revenues increased $115.5 million, or 15.2%, to $875.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase is attributable to internal revenue growth (8%) resulting from net increases in records and other media stored by existing customers and sales to new customers, acquisitions (5%), primarily consisting of $30.0 million from the operations of Hays IMS, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (2%). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations were primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, and Euro against the U.S. dollar, offset by a weakening of the Mexican peso and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods.

        Consolidated service and storage material sales revenues increased $67.3 million, or 12.0%, to $626.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase is attributable to acquisitions (7%), including revenue from the Hays IMS operations of $24.6 million, internal revenue growth (3%) resulting from net increases in service and storage material sales to existing customers and sales to new customers, and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations (2%). Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations were primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, and Euro against the U.S. dollar, offset by a weakening of the Mexican peso and Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods.

        For the reasons stated above, our consolidated revenues increased $182.8 million, or 13.9%, to $1,501.3 million. Internal revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 6%. We calculate internal revenue growth in local currency for our international operations.

Internal Growth—Eight-Quarter Trend

        Our internal revenue growth rate represents the weighted average year over year growth rate of our revenues after removing the effects of acquisitions and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Over the past eight quarters, the internal growth rate of our storage revenues has ranged between 8% to 9%. Our storage revenue internal growth rate trend for the year ended December 31, 2003 reflects higher growth rates in our international businesses, primarily Europe, stabilized net carton volume growth in our North American records management business and higher growth rates in our digital businesses. We experienced higher volumes of carton destructions and permanent removals in the fourth quarter of 2003 as compared to the first three quarters of 2003, which contributed to the decline in our internal growth rate for storage revenue from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of 2003. We experienced similar volumes of destructions and permanent removals in the fourth quarter of 2002. Net carton volume growth is a function of the rate new cartons are added by existing and new customers offset by the rate of carton destructions and other permanent removals.

        The internal growth rate for service and storage material sales revenue is inherently more volatile than the storage revenue internal growth rate due to more discretionary services we offer such as large special projects, data products and carton sales and recycled paper. These revenues are impacted to a greater extent by economic downturns as customers defer or cancel the purchase of these services as a way to reduce their short-term costs. As a commodity, recycled paper prices are subject to the volatility

32

of that market. The quarterly growth rates in 2003 were negatively impacted by several factors: (1) large special project service revenue did not achieve the same high levels experienced in the corresponding periods of 2002, (2) product sales, primarily data product sales, decreased and (3) carton destructions and other permanent removals have decreased relative to prior periods. In addition, our off-site data protection business continued to operate in a market experiencing downward pressure on information technology spending as companies look to reduce their costs.

Cost of Sales

        Consolidated cost of sales (excluding depreciation) is comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

Labor

        Labor expense decreased as a percentage of revenue as a result of improved labor management in our North American operations and lower incentive compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. This improvement was offset by increases in wages, medical expenses, and headcount due to growth and acquisitions in our secure shredding operations and the acquisition of Hays IMS. We expect labor expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues in 2004 may increase as we report a full year of integrated Hays IMS operations.

Facilities

        The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which increased $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily as a result of increased rent in our European operations of $9.0 million attributable to new facilities and properties acquired through acquisitions, including our acquisition of Hays IMS. In addition, after adjusting for the consolidation of properties owned by our Variable Interest Entities, we have increased the number of leased facilities we occupy in the U.S. and Canada as of December 31, 2003 compared to December 31, 2002 primarily due to acquisitions. The increase in rent is offset by the consolidation of 38 properties owned by our Variable Interest Entities during the third and fourth quarter of 2002. The leases associated with these properties were accounted for as operating leases prior to December 31, 2002. We recorded $5.9 million of rent expense for these 38 properties during the year ended December 31, 2002 and no rent expense in the year ended December 31, 2003. Rather than rent expense, we recorded interest expense and depreciation expense associated with these properties for the year ended December 31, 2003. Excluding our European operations, the dollar increase in facilities expenses is attributable to property taxes, utilities, and property insurance, which increased $5.5 million, $4.0 million, and $1.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. Facilities expenses in our European operations increased $6.4 million primarily due to the growth of operations and acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.

33

We anticipate that reporting a full year of integrated Hays IMS operations and no longer having the offsetting impact caused by our Variable Interest Entities could cause an increase in rent expense and possibly in total facility costs as a percentage of consolidated revenues in 2004.

Transportation

        Our transportation expenses, which were flat as a percentage of consolidated revenues, are influenced by several variables including total number of vehicles, owned versus leased vehicles, use of subcontracted couriers, fuel expenses, and maintenance. In the year ended December 31, 2003, we experienced a $3.4 million increase in transportation expenses in our European operations as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, which is primarily attributable to an increase in fleet size and vehicles under operating lease resulting from the acquisition of Hays IMS and growth of operations. Transportation efficiencies achieved in our North American operations, partially offset by higher fuel costs and an increased percentage of vehicles under operating lease, mitigated the impact of our European operations on transportation expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues.

Product Cost of Sales and Other Cost of Sales

        Product and other cost of sales are highly correlated to complementary revenue streams. Product cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2003 was lower than the year ended December 31, 2002 as a percentage of product revenues due to more focused selling efforts on higher margin products and improved product sourcing.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):

General and Administrative

        The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003 is primarily attributable to a $16.4 million increase in general and administrative expenses in our European operations due to the growth of operations and acquisitions. In our North American operations, general and administrative expenses increased as a result of higher wages due to normal inflation and merit increases, and increases in worker's compensation and medical expenses. The increase in labor expenses was partially offset by decreases in general insurance expenses and lower incentive compensation expenses. We anticipate increased pressure on our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of consolidated revenues as we integrate the operations of Hays IMS.

34

Sales, Marketing & Account Management

        The majority of our sales, marketing and account management costs are labor related and are primarily driven by the headcount in each of these departments. Increased headcount and commissions are the most significant contributors to the increase in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003. Throughout the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, we continued to invest in the expansion and improvement of our sales force and account management personnel. Excluding our European operations, since December 31, 2002, we added 66 sales and marketing employees, a 16% increase in headcount, increased our account management force and initiated several new marketing and promotional efforts to develop awareness in the marketplace of our entire service offerings. The costs associated with these efforts have contributed to the increase in our sales, marketing and account management expenses. In addition, costs associated with our European sales and account management teams increased by $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, due to the hiring of new personnel and the expansion of our European sales force. We expect that sales, marketing and account management expenses will continue to increase as a percentage of consolidated revenues as we continue to expand and train our sales force and develop new marketing initiatives.

Information Technology

        Information technology expenses increased $12.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 principally due to higher compensation costs resulting from increased headcount, normal inflation and merit increases, as well as an increase in external resources, which was partially offset by lower incentive compensation expenses. As our technology initiatives mature, less of our efforts are development related, thus decreasing capitalizable expenditures, which results in increased information technology expenses. In addition, we incurred additional costs to expand bandwidth and international connectivity in the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 to satisfy growth of our business and to integrate acquisitions.

Bad Debt Expense

        The decrease in consolidated bad debt expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 is primarily attributable to the success of our centralized collection efforts within the U.S. and Canada during 2002 and 2003, which resulted in improved cash collections and an improved accounts receivable aging that enabled us to significantly reduce our allowance for doubtful accounts in the year ended December 31, 2003. We do not expect to experience a similar decrease during 2004 and expect bad debt expense to be approximately 0.5% of consolidated revenues in 2004.

Depreciation, Amortization, Merger-Related Expenses and Loss on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

        Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense increased $21.9 million to $130.9 million (8.7% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $109.0 million (8.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002. Depreciation expense increased $19.8 million, primarily due to the additional depreciation expense related to recent capital expenditures, including storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings, and depreciation associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases. Depreciation associated with our digital initiatives increased $5.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2003 as a result of software and hardware assets placed in service throughout the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003. The consolidation of the properties owned by our Variable Interest Entities during the year ended December 31, 2002 resulted in $2.2 million of additional depreciation in the year ended December 31, 2003. Amortization expense increased as a

35

result of the amortization of intangible assets associated with acquisitions we completed in the fourth quarter of 2002 and during the year ended December 31, 2003.

        Merger-related expenses are certain expenses directly related to our merger with Pierce Leahy that cannot be capitalized and included system conversion costs, costs of exiting certain facilities, severance, relocation and pay-to-stay payments and other transaction-related costs. Merger-related expenses were $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. All merger related activities associated with the Pierce Leahy merger were completed in 2002.

        Consolidated loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net consisted of disposals and asset writedowns partially offset by $4.2 million of gains on the sale of properties in Texas, Florida and the U.K. in the year ended December 31, 2003 and a gain of $2.1 million on the sale of a property in the U.K. in the year ended December 31, 2002.

Operating Income

        As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated operating income increased $52.3 million, or 20.7%, to $304.9 million (20.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $252.6 million (19.2% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

OIBDA

        As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated OIBDA increased $74.2 million, or 20.5%, to $435.8 million (29.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $361.6 million (27.4% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Interest Expense, Net

        Consolidated interest expense, net increased $13.8 million to $150.5 million (10.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $136.6 million (10.4% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily attributable to (1) $7.4 million of interest expense associated with real estate term loans held by our Variable Interest Entities that were consolidated in the second half of 2002, (2) borrowings under our revolving credit facility and the issuance of our 6⁵/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the "6⁵/8% notes") which were used to finance the Hays IMS acquisition, and (3) an increase in our overall weighted average outstanding borrowings. The increase was offset by a decline in our overall weighted average interest rate from 8.3% as of December 31, 2002 to 7.7% as of December 31, 2003 resulting from our refinancing efforts and a decline in variable interest rates.

Other Expense (Income), Net (in thousands)

        Foreign currency gains of $30.2 million based on period-end exchange rates were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar and British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with our Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries, U.S. dollar denominated debt held by our Canadian subsidiary,

36

borrowings denominated in foreign currencies under our revolving credit facility, and our British pound sterling denominated cross currency swap.

        During the year ended December 31, 2003, we redeemed the remaining outstanding principal amount of our 9¹/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the "9¹/8% notes"), resulting in a charge of $1.8 million, the remaining outstanding principal amount of our 8³/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (the "8³/4% notes"), resulting in a charge of $13.8 million, and $115.0 million of the outstanding principal of the 8¹/8% Senior Notes due 2008 of our Canadian subsidiary (the "Subsidiary notes"), resulting in a charge of $12.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded a charge of $1.2 million related to the early retirement of debt in conjunction with the refinancing of our revolving credit facility and a charge of $4.2 million related to the early retirement of a portion of our 9¹/8% notes. The charges consisted primarily of the call and tender premiums associated with the extinguished debt and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing cost and discounts.

Provision for Income Taxes

        Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 42.5%. The primary reconciling item between the statutory rate of 35% and our effective tax rate is state income taxes (net of federal benefit). The disallowance of certain intercompany interest charges by states, including a change in Massachusetts tax laws, retroactive to January 1, 2002, increased our provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2003 by 1.1%. Our effective tax rate was 41.3% for the year ended December 31, 2002. There may be future volatility with respect to our effective tax rate related to items including unusual unforecasted permanent items, significant changes in tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the need for additional valuation allowances. Also, as a result of our net operating loss carryforwards, we do not expect to pay any significant international, U.S. federal and state income taxes during 2004.

Minority Interest, Discontinued Operations, and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

        Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries, net resulted in a charge to income of $5.6 million (0.4% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $3.6 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002. This represents our minority partners' share of earnings in our majority-owned international subsidiaries that are consolidated in our operating results. The increase is a result of the improved profitability of our European and South American businesses.

        In the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded income from discontinued operations of $1.1 million (net of tax of $0.8 million) as a result of resolving several outstanding contingencies remaining from the sale of the Arcus Staffing Resources, Inc. business unit in 1999. There was no such income recorded in 2003.

        In the first quarter of 2002, we recorded a non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $6.4 million (net of minority interest of $8.5 million) as a result of our implementation of SFAS No. 142. There was no such charge in 2003.

Net Income

        As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated net income increased $26.3 million, or 45.2%, to $84.6 million (5.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2003 from net income of $58.3 million (4.4% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

37

Segment Analysis (in thousands)

        The results of our various operating segments are discussed below. In general, our business records management segment offers records management, secure shredding, healthcare information services, vital records services, and service and courier operations in the U.S. and Canada. Our off-site data protection segment offers data backup and disaster recovery services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and intellectual property protection services in the U.S. Our international segment offers elements of all our product and services lines outside the U.S. and Canada. Our corporate and other segment includes our corporate overhead functions and our fulfillment, consulting and digital archiving services.