TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202022

OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to ____________
SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.Commission file number 001-04321

NuScale Power Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Cayman Islands001-3973698-1588588
Delaware
98-1588588
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(Commission File
Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
2100 McKinney Ave., Suite 1675
Dallas, TX
75201No.)
6650 SW Redwood Ln Suite 210PortlandOregon97224
(Address of principal executive offices)Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
Registrant’s(971) 371-1592
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 308-5230code
Not ApplicableRobert Temple
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
6650 SW Redwood Lane
Suite 210
PortlandOR97224
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class:each classTrading Symbol(s)Trading Symbol:
Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which
Registered:
which registered
Units, each consisting of one Class A ordinary share,common stock, $0.0001 par value and one-half of one redeemable warrantper shareSMRSVSVUThe NASDAQ Capital MarketNew York Stock Exchange
Class A ordinary shares included as part of the unitsSVThe NASDAQ Capital Market
Warrants, included as part of the units, each whole warrant exercisable for one share of Class A ordinary sharecommon stock at an exercise price of $11.50 per shareSMR.WSSVSVWThe NASDAQ Capital MarketNew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Sectionsection 12(g) of the Act: None
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ☐Act.Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes ☐Act.Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregistrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),; and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No x
As of June 30, 2020, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the registrant’s securities were not publicly traded. The registrant’s units began trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) on December 8, 2020 and the registrant’s shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 (the “Class A common stock”) and warrants began trading on the NASDAQ on January 18, 2021.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock outstanding, other than sharesequity held by persons who may be deemed affiliatesnon-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the closing sales price forat which the sharescommon equity was last sold, as of common stock on December 31, 2020, as reported on the NYSE, June 30, 2022 was $242,650,000 (based on the closing sales price of the Class A common stock on December 31, 2020 of $10.55).approximately $419 million.
As of May 7, 2021, 23,000,000

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
The registrant had 69,900,572 shares of Class A common stock par value $0.0001, and 5,750,000157,090,820 shares of Class B common stock par value $0.0001, were issued and outstanding.outstanding as of March 13, 2023.
Documents Incorporated
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's proxy statement for its 2023 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by Reference:reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
None.


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Page
Glossary
v
7











i


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Glossary
EXPLANATORY NOTE
ReferencesThe definitions and abbreviations set forth below apply to the indicated terms used throughout this Amendment No. 1filing.

“Class A common stock” refers to shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NuScale Power Corporation
“Class B common stock” refers to shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of NuScale Power Corporation, which represents the right to one vote per share and carries no economic rights.
“combined interests” refers to the Annual Report on Form 10-Kcombination of shares of Class B common stock and NuScale LLC Class B units required to “we,” “us,” “SVAC,” “Spring Valley,” “company” or “our company” arebe exchanged for Class A common stock
“common stock” refers collectively to Spring Valley Acquisition Corp., unless the context otherwise indicates.shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock.
This Amendment No. 1 (“Amendment No. 1”)“Closing” refers to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A amendsclosing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KMerger.
“DOE” refers to the U.S. Department of Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, as filed withEnergy.
“EPCDA” refers to Engineering, Procurement, Construction Development Agreement
“EPZ” refers to Emergency Planning Zone
“Exchange Act” refers to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2021 (the “Original Filing”)Act of 1934, as amended.
“Fluor” refers to Fluor Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, which is wholly owned by Fluor
Corporation (NYSE: FLR).
Restatement Background
On April 12, 2021, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a public statement entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” ​(the “Statement”). In the Statement, the SEC staff expressed its view that certain terms and conditions common“GAAP” refers to SPAC warrants may require the warrants to be classified as liabilities on the SPAC’s balance sheet as opposed to equity. Since issuance on November 27, 2020, our warrants were accounted for as equity within our financial statements, and after discussion and evaluation, including with our independent auditors, we have concluded that our warrants should be presented as liabilities as of the IPO date reported at fair value with subsequent fair value remeasurement at each reporting period.
Therefore, the Company, in consultation with its Audit Committee, concluded that its previously issued Financial Statements for the periods beginning with the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2020 (collectively, the “Affected Periods”) should be restated because of a misapplicationgenerally accepted accounting principles in the guidance around accounting for our outstanding warrants to purchase common stock (the “Warrants”)United States set forth in the opinions and should no longer be relied upon.
Historically, the Warrants were reflected as a component of equity as opposed to liabilities on the balance sheets and the statements of operations did not include the subsequent non-cash changes in estimated fair valuepronouncements of the Warrants, based on our application of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40). The views expressedor such other principles as may be approved by a significant segment of the accounting profession in the Statement were not consistent with the Company’s historical interpretation of the specific provisions within its warrant agreement and the Company’s application of ASC 815-40United States, that are applicable to the warrant agreements. We reassessed our accounting for Warrants issued on November 27, 2020, in light of the SEC Staff’s published views. Based on this reassessment, we determined that the Warrants should be classified as liabilities measured at fair value upon issuance, with subsequent changes in fair value reported in our Statement of Operations each reporting period.
In connection with the restatement, management has re-evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. Management has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of December 31, 2020, due to a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for equity instruments. For a discussion of management’s consideration of our disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls over financial reporting, and the material weaknesses identified, see Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” of this Form 10-K/A.
Items Amended in this Form 10-K/A
This Form 10-K/A presents the Original Filing, amended and restated with modifications as necessary to reflect the restatements. The following items have been amended to reflect the restatement:
Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors
Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
In addition, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have provided new certifications datedcircumstances as of the date of this filing in connection with this Form 10-K/A (Exhibits 31.1determination, consistently applied.
“G&A” expenses refers to general and 32.1).administrative expenses.
Except as described above, this Form 10-K/A does not amend, update“IPO” or change any other items or disclosures in the Original Filing and does not purport to reflect any information or events subsequent“Initial Public Offering” refers to the filing thereof. As such, this Form 10-K/A speaks only as of the date the Original Filing was filed, and we have not undertaken herein to amend, supplement or update any information contained in the Original Filing to give effect to any subsequent events. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing, including any amendment to those filings.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN TERMS
Unless otherwise stated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (this “Report”), or the context otherwise requires, references to:

“amended and restated memorandum and article of association” are to the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the company;

“anchor investors” are to certain qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors that purchased units in our initial public offering each of Spring Valley, which is a member of holdco;closed on
November 27, 2020.

Companies Act” areLegacy NuScale Equityholders” refers to the Companies Act (as amended)holders of NuScale LLC units other than NuScale Power Corporation
“Merger” refers to the Cayman Islandsmerger of Merger Sub with and into NuScale LLC, with NuScale LLC as the same may besurviving entity.
“Merger Agreement” refers to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 13, 2021 (as amended, modified, supplemented or waived from time to time;time), between Spring Valley, Merger Sub and NuScale LLC.
“Merger Sub” refers to Spring Valley Merger Sub, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and a

wholly owned subsidiary of Spring Valley.
Contractual Redemption Date” areMWe” refers to one million watts of electric power.
“NPM” refers to NuScale Power Module™.
“NRC” refers to the date which our sponsor may atU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
“NuScale Corp” refers to NuScale Power Corporation, a Delaware corporation and the combined company following the consummation of the Transaction, and its option extend the period of time for usconsolidated subsidiaries, including NuScale LLC.
“NuScale LLC” refers to consummate a business combination (one time, byNuScale Power, LLC, an additional six months), subjectOregon limited liability company.
“NuScale LLC Class A units” refers to the sponsor purchasing additional private placement warrants;Class A units of NuScale LLC issued to NuScale Corp immediately after the Closing.

founder shares” are to ourNuScale LLC Class B units” refers to non-voting, Class B units of NuScale LLC.
“NuScale LLC units” refers to the collective NuScale LLC limited liability company interests existing immediately after the Closing.
“NYSE” means the New York Stock Exchange.
“Private Placement Warrants” refers to the 8,900,000 warrants to purchase Spring Valley Class A ordinary shares initiallythat
were issued to our sponsor in a private placement priorconcurrently with the IPO and converted in the Transaction into warrants to our Initial Public Offering and thepurchase Class A ordinary shares that will becommon stock.
“Public Warrants” refers to the 11,500,000 redeemable warrants issued uponin the automatic conversion ofIPO and converted in the Class B ordinary shares at the time of our initial business combination or earlier at the option of the holders thereof  (for the avoidance of doubt, suchTransaction
into warrants to purchase Class A ordinary shares will not be “public shares”);common stock.
“R&D” refers to research and development.

“SEC” refers to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
holdco” areSecurities Act” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
“SMR” refers to small modular reactor.
“Sponsor” refers to Spring Valley Acquisition Sponsor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
“Sponsor Sub” refers to SV Acquisition Sponsor Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companycompany.
“Spring Valley” refers to NuScale Corp prior to the Merger and wholly-owned subsidiary of our sponsor and certain ofprior to the anchor investors;

“Initial Public Offering” means our initial public offering on November 27, 2020 of 23,000,000 units, which includes the full exercise by the underwriterschange of its over-allotment option in the amount of 3,000,000 units, at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $230,000,000;

“management” or our “management team” are to our executive officers and directors;

“ordinary shares” are to our Class A ordinary shares and our Class B ordinary shares;

“private placement warrants” are to the warrants issued to our sponsor in a private placement simultaneously with the closing of our Initial Public Offering and upon conversion of working capital loans, if any, as well as warrants to be issued to our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees at our sponsor’s option upon extension of our initial time period to complete our initial business combination;

“public shares” are to our Class A ordinary shares sold as part of the units in our Initial Public Offering (whether they were purchased in our Initial Public Offering or thereafter in the open market) and for the avoidance of doubt, do not include the Class A ordinary shares that will be issued upon the automatic conversion of the Class B ordinary shares;

“public shareholders” are to the holders of our public shares, including our sponsor and management team to the extent our sponsor and/or members of our management team purchase public shares, provided that our sponsor’s and each member of our management team’s status as a “public shareholder” will only exist with respect to such public shares;

“sponsor” are to Spring Valley Acquisition Sponsor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and

“SVII” are toname from Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. II, a special purpose acquisition companyto NuScale Power Corporation.
“Tax Receivable Agreement” or “TRA” refers to the tax receivable agreement entered into concurrently with the Closing between NuScale Corp, NuScale LLC and the Legacy NuScale Equityholders.
“Transaction” refers to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.
“Warrants” refers collectively to the Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants.




Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act that expectsare not historical facts and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to complete its initial public offering in 2021;

“Victory” are to Victory Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company that expects to complete its initial public offering in 2021;differ materially from those expected and

“we,” “us,” “our,” “company” or “our company” are to Spring Valley Acquisition Corp., a Cayman Islands exempted company.
Any forfeiture projected. All statements, other than statements of shares describedhistorical fact included in this Report will take effect as a surrender of shares for no consideration of such shares as a matter of Cayman Islands law. Any conversion of the Class B ordinary shares describedForm 10-K, including, without limitation, statements in this Report will take effect as a compulsory redemption“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Class B ordinary sharesFinancial Condition and an issuanceResults of Class A ordinary shares as a matter of Cayman Islands law. Any share dividends described in this Report will take effect as share capitalizations as a matter of Cayman Islands law.

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the statements contained in this Report may constitute “forward-looking statements” for purposes of the federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statementsOperations” regarding our or our management team’sfinancial position and business strategy and the expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions, or strategies regarding theplans and objectives of management for future including our recently announced proposed business combination with AeroFarms Inc. (“AeroFarms”). In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions,operations, are forward-looking statements. The wordsWords such as “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “believe,“intend,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,“will,“would”“would,” “estimate,” “seek” and variations and similar words and expressions mayare intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this Reportannual report may include, for example, statements about:

our financial and business performance, including financial projections and business metrics;
our ability to select an appropriate target business or businesses;

our ability to complete our initial business combination, including our recently announced proposed business combination with AeroFarms;

our expectations around the performance of a prospective target business or businesses;

our success in retaining or recruiting, or changes required in, our officers, key employees or directors following our initial business combination;

our officers and directors allocating their time to other businesses and potentially having conflicts of interest with our business or in approving our initial business combination;

our potential ability to obtain additional financingregulatory approvals to completedeploy our initial business combination;SMRs in the United States and abroad;

our pool of prospective target businesses;

our ability to consummate an initial business combination due to the uncertainty resulting from the recent COVID-19 pandemicforecasts regarding end-customer adoption rates and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases);

the ability of our officers and directors to generate a number of potential business combination opportunities;

our public securities’ potential liquidity and trading;

the lack of a marketdemand for our securities;products in markets that are new and rapidly evolving;
macroeconomic conditions;

the use of proceeds not held in the trust account or available to us from interest income on the trust account balance;

the trust account not being subject to claims of third parties;

our financial performance following our Initial Public Offering; or

the other riskdevelopments and uncertainties discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including, when it becomes available, in our preliminary prospectus/proxy statementprojections relating to our proposedcompetitors and industry;
our anticipated growth rates and market opportunities;
the period over which we anticipate our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements;
the potential for our business combination with AeroFarms.development efforts to maximize the potential value of our portfolio; and
our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing.
The
Such forward-looking statements contained in this Report arerelate to future events or future performance, but reflect management’s current beliefs, based on our current expectationsinformation currently available. Many factors could cause actual events, performance or results to differ materially from the events, performance and beliefs concerning future developmentsresults discussed in the forward-looking statements, and their potential effects on us. Therethere can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions

Important factors that maycould cause actual results or performance to bediffer materially different from those expressed or implied by theseanticipated in the forward-looking statements. These risksstatements, are summarized below and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described underin more detail in the heading “Risk Factors.section of this annual report titled “Risk Factors Should. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or shouldif any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake noThere may be additional risks that we currently consider immaterial, or which are unknown. It is not possible to predict or identify all such risks. Except as expressly required by applicable securities law, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, exceptotherwise. No person should take any statement regarding past trends or activities as may be requireda representation that the trends or activities will continue in the future.

Summary of Risk Factors

Our business involves significant risks, and you should carefully read and consider the factors discussed under applicable securities laws.

v

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY OF RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves“Risk Factors.” The following is a high degreesummary of risk. The occurrencesome of one or morethese risks. If any of the following events or circumstances described in the section titled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may materially adversely affectoccur, our business, financial condition and operating results. In that event,results, and the trading pricevalue of our securities could decline,Class A common stock and you could lose all or part of your investment. SuchWarrants, may be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Governance
We are subject to risks that include but are not limited to:to those risks related to our dependency on NuScale LLC to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends and fees associated with being a public company such as director retainers, NYSE and other regulatory filings;

We areIf NuScale LLC were treated as a recently incorporated company with no operating history and no revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.

Past performance by our Teamcorporation for United States federal income tax or their respective affiliates may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.

Our expectations regarding changes in the Sustainability industry may not materialize to the extent we expect, or at all.

Our shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed initial business combination, which means we may complete our initial business combination even though a majority of our shareholders do not support such a combination.

Your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.

If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and members of our management team have agreed to vote in favor of such initial business combination, regardless of how our public shareholders vote.

The ability of our public shareholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.

The ability of our public shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure.

The requirement that we consummate an initial business combination within 18 months after the closing of our Initial Public Offering, or prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combination and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets, in particular as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our initial business combination on terms that would produce value for our shareholders.

Our sponsor has the right to extend the term we have to consummate our initial business combination up to 24 months, without providing our stockholders with redemption rights.

Our sponsor may decide not to extend the term we have to consummate our initial business combination, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and we would redeem our public shares and liquidate, and the rights and warrants will be worthless.

Our search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the status of debt and equity markets.

If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase public shares or warrants, which may influence a vote on a proposed business combination and reduce the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or public warrants.

If a shareholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our initial business combination, or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS


You will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.

The Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions.

You will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.

Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per public share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless.

If the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants not being held in the trust account are insufficient to allow us to operate for the 18 months following the closing of our Initial Public Offering, until the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, it could limitstate tax purposes, then the amount available for distribution by NuScale LLC could be substantially reduced and the value of NuScale Corp shares could be adversely affected;
In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual tax benefits NuScale Corp realizes;
NuScale is a “controlled company” under the NYSE listing standards and an “emerging growth company” (“EGC”) under the Securities Act, and as a result, its stockholders may not have certain corporate protections or receive disclosures that are available to fundstockholders of companies that are not controlled companies or EGCs.




Risks Related to NuScale’s Business and Industry

We have not yet delivered an NPM to a customer or entered into a binding contract with a customer to deliver NPMs, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to do so;
Competitors in China and Russia currently operate commercial SMRs and may have advantages in marketing their SMRs to potential customers;
We may be unable to charge Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (“UAMPS”), our searchfirst customer, for a target business or businesses and our abilitysome costs we have incurred; we may be required to complete our initial business combination,reimburse UAMPS if we fail to achieve specified performance measures, and we are required to hold restricted cash in the amount of $26.5 million to secure our reimbursement obligations and up to $81 million by the end of calendar year 2023, which amount will depend on loans frombe unavailable for other expenditures;
Any delays in the development and manufacture of NPMs and related technology, the failure of any commercial or demonstration missions, or the failure to timely deliver NPMs to customers may adversely affect our sponsor, its affiliates or members of our management teambusiness and financial condition;
We have incurred significant losses since inception, we expect to fund our search and to complete our initial business combination.

Holders of Class A ordinary shares will not be entitled to vote on any appointment of directors we hold prior to our initial business combination.

The warrants may become exercisable and redeemable for a security other thanincur losses in the Class A ordinary shares, and you will not have any information regarding such other security at this time.

Unlike some other similarly structured blank check companies, our sponsor will receive additional Class A ordinary shares if we issue shares to consummate an initial business combination.

We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction in connection with our initial business combination, and the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future, material agreements and we may not be able to enforceachieve or maintain profitability;
The cost of electricity generated from nuclear sources may not be cost competitive with other electricity generation sources in some markets, and we may fail to effectively incorporate updates to the design, construction and operations of our legal rights.plants to ensure cost competitiveness, which could materially and adversely affect our business;
The market for SMRs is not yet established and may not achieve the growth potential expected or may grow more slowly than expected;

Our commercialization strategy relies on our relationships with Fluor and other strategic investors and partners, who may have interests that diverge from ours and who may not be easily replaced if their relationships terminate;
AfterWe may be unable to manage future growth effectively, which could make it difficult to execute our initial business combination,strategy;
If manufacturing and construction issues are not identified before design finalization, long-lead procurement and/or module fabrication, those issues will be realized during production, fabrication, construction or operation and may negatively affect plant deployment cost and schedule;
We, and our customers, operate in a politically sensitive environment, and may be affected by the public perception of nuclear energy and accidents, terrorist attacks or other high-profile events involving nuclear materials;
Our supply base may not be able to scale to the production levels necessary to meet sales projections, and a lack of availability and cost of component raw materials may affect the manufacturing processes for plant equipment and increase our costs;
We depend on our senior management team and other highly skilled personnel, and we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy if we are unable to attract qualified personnel;
We may require additional future funding, which may be difficult or impossible to obtain on acceptable terms or at all and which may be negatively affected by the resale of shares of Class A common stock by selling securityholders which could result in a significant decline in the trading price of our Class A common stock;
We may not receive the DOE cost share funding as a result of appropriations or allocations obligated by the DOE, which could affect how quickly we need additional funding;
We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, in particular rights in non-U.S. jurisdictions, and may be subject to infringement claims from others;
Our design is only approved in the United States and we must obtain approvals on a country- by-country basis before we may sell its products abroad, which approvals may be delayed or denied or which may require modification to our design;
At the end of 2022, we submitted SDA applications to approve a VOYGR-6 plant design and to raise the licensed output of our NPM from 50 MWe to 77 MWe. The NRC has begun the acceptance review. If the NRC does not approve our applications, the rework required to address NRC concerns could substantially delay the commercialization of our products;
Our customers must obtain additional, site-specific regulatory approvals before they can construct power plants using NPMs, which may be delayed or denied;
Our first customer project, CFPP, is dependent upon future congressional appropriations to fund the $1.355B cost-share award from U.S. DOE, which appropriations are uncertain as to amounts, timing or imposition of conditions that could result in the delay or termination of the project; and
Our business is subject to a wide variety of extensive and evolving laws and regulations - including export and import controls, nuclear material and nuclear power regulations, and environmental regulations - and changes in and/or failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Sufficient funding for the CFPP DOE award in fiscal year 2024 will be necessary to maintain proposed schedules. The federal budget and appropriations process is complex and uncertain. Insufficient funding or delay in fiscal year 2024 funding could result in the delay or termination of CFPP.



Our SDA applications may not be approved, and any rework necessary to address NRC concerns could significantly delay the commercialization of our products.

General Risk Factors

Our business has similar vulnerabilities to cybersecurity events as other businesses, in that a cyber event may limit access to information needed to deliver our product to our customers, may compromise personnel or customer data kept in our systems, may corrupt proprietary information necessary to manufacture or receive regulatory approval for our designs, and may cause other similar difficulties as may be expected for a business of our kind.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Shares of Class A common stock and Warrants

We are subject to risks related to the volatility of the price of our Class A common stock and Warrants;
The resale of shares we have registered on a registration statement on Form S-1, which represent a majority of the shares that are or will be outstanding, could cause the market price of our stock to drop significantly; and
Warrants are exercisable for Class A common stock, which, if exercised, would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.



Part I
Item 1. Business
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to NuScale, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to the consolidated operations of NuScale Corp and NuScale LLC.
Overview
NuScale is redefining nuclear power through the development of proprietary and innovative SMR technology that will deliver safe, scalable, cost-effective and reliable carbon-free power. Our core technology, the NPM, can generate 77 MWe and is premised on well-established nuclear technology principles, with a focus on the integration of components, simplification or elimination of systems and use of passive safety features. We believe this results in a safe and highly reliable power plant, suitable to be sited close to where electricity or process heat is needed. Our flagship VOYGRTM power plant is a scalable plant design that can accommodate up to 12 NPMs, resulting in a total gross output of 924 MWe. NuScale expects the first VOYGR power plant to be operational in 2029.

Since 2007, we and the DOE have invested over $1.4 billion toward the development of our NPM and VOYGRTM power plant technology and we have been issued 469 patents globally, with an additional 186 patent applications currently pending. In September 2020, our 12-module VOYGR-12TM design (currently approved for 160 million watts of thermal power (“MWt”) or 50 MWe per NPM) became the first and only SMR to receive a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Standard Design Approval (SDA) from the NRC. The NRC’s final rulemaking approving NuScale’s design certification was effective in February 2023. The approval was a critical milestone that allows customers to move forward with plans to develop VOYGR power plants, knowing that safety aspects of the NuScale design are NRC-approved. In December 2022, we applied for an SDA for an increase in NPM power from 50 MWe to 77 MWe (160 MWt to 250 MWt) per module, which we expect to receive in 2024. We expect to be ready to deliver modules to customers by 2028.
Our unique SMR has several key defining characteristics, including:
Proven. Our NPM technology leverages existing light water nuclear reactor technology and fuel supply that have been operating globally for over 60 years.
Simple. NuScale’s simple NPM design, based on natural circulation, integrates the reactor core, steam generators and pressurizer in a single factory-built vessel and eliminates the need for reactor coolant circulating pumps, large bore piping and other components found in conventional large-scale nuclear reactors. This simplicity improves safety and reduces capital and operational costs.
Scalable. In addition to our flagship 12-module (924 MWe) VOYGR-12 power plant, we offer smaller power plant solutions including the six-module (462 MWe) VOYGR-6TM and the four-module (308 MWe) VOYGR-4TM. These VOYGR power plants can commence operation with one module and scale to house up to their approved capacity of twelve, six or four modules. This scalability will allow customers to right-size their up-front capital investment and economically increase installed capacity over time through the addition of NPMs.
Safe. VOYGR power plants have been designed to be the safest in the world and have several industry-first advantages over conventional large-scale nuclear plants, including an unlimited “coping” period during which the NPMs can be shut down and kept in a safe condition without operator intervention, AC or DC power or any additional cooling water. As a result, we have numerous operational and commercial advantages including a safety case that supports a small, site-boundary emergency planning zone (“EPZ”) designation by the NRC, as well as various resiliency and reliability features including the ability to start and operate a plant without AC or DC power to provide first-responder power.
In addition to the sale of NPMs and our VOYGR power plant designs, we will offer a diversified suite of services throughout the development and operating life of the power plant. Our suite of services includes licensing support, testing, training, fuel supply services and program management, among others. We anticipate that our service offering will have high penetration rates across our customer base and will provide consistent, recurring revenues throughout the life of the VOYGR power plant. We expect service revenue to begin approximately eight years prior to a power plant’s commercial operation date and to extend throughout the life of the power plant.
Our potential customers are a mix of domestic and international governments, political subdivisions, utilities, state-owned enterprises and industrial companies in need of carbon-free, reliable energy. Our first contract to deploy a VOYGR power plant is with UAMPS. UAMPS is expected to deploy a six-module (462 MWe) VOYGR-6 power plant as part of its CFPP located at the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho. Construction at the CFPP is expected to begin in 2025 and the plant is expected to be operational in 2029. Additionally, in November 2021, we signed a teaming agreement with
1


S.N. Nuclearelectrica to advance the delivery of our technology in Romania as early as 2029. In total, our sales pipeline currently includes over 120 active customer opportunities and 17 signed Memoranda of Understanding (“MOUs”) globally.
To date, the DOE has granted NuScale four separate cost-share awards totaling more than $656 million, including most recently, $350 million as part of a 5-year, $700 million 50/50 cost-share award granted in 2020. We also benefit from a global network of strategic investors and supply chain partners that we expect will play an integral role in bringing NuScale’s technology to market around the world. Fluor, a leading global engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) firm, is the majority stockholder in NuScale and collaborates with NuScale on plant standard design and the provision of EPC services to NuScale’s customers. Other strategic investors and supply chain partners include Doosan; Sargent & Lundy, LLC; Sarens; JGC; IHI; GS Energy Corporation; and Samsung C&T, among others.

Merger Transaction

On December 13, 2021, Spring Valley, NuScale LLC and Merger Sub entered into the Merger Agreement. On May 2, 2022, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged into NuScale LLC (the “Merger”) with NuScale LLC surviving, Spring Valley was renamed NuScale Power Corporation, and NuScale LLC continued to be held as a wholly controlled subsidiary of NuScale Corp in an “Up-C” structure (collectively, the “Transaction”). As a result of the Transaction, NuScale Corp holds all of the NuScale LLC Class A units (which are the sole voting interests at the NuScale LLC level) and Legacy NuScale Equityholders hold NuScale LLC Class B units (which are non-voting) and shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock (which entitle the Legacy NuScale Equityholder to vote at the NuScale Corp level but which carry no economic rights). At specified times, in NuScale Corp’s discretion, Legacy NuScale Equityholders may exchange NuScale LLC Class B units (together with cancellation of an equal number of shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock) for NuScale Corp Class A common stock.

The Transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization as provided under GAAP, with NuScale Corp treated as the acquired company and NuScale LLC treated as the acquirer. This determination reflects that Legacy NuScale Equityholders hold a majority of the voting power of NuScale Corp, that NuScale LLC’s pre-Merger operations constitute the majority post-merger operations of NuScale Corp, and that NuScale LLC’s management team retained similar roles at NuScale Corp.

Industry
According to BloombergNEF’s New Energy Outlook 2021 “Red Scenario” (“NEO 2021”), which includes SMR capacity as part of the pathway to global net-zero carbon emissions, global power consumption is expected to increase 191% between 2020 and 2040, requiring approximately 22,000 gigawatts (“GW”) of additional generating capacity. Today, the energy and power markets are undergoing dramatic changes as they shift from fossil fuels to carbon-free sources. A series of technological, economic, regulatory, social and investor pressures are leading the drive to decarbonize electricity and other sectors, such as transportation (electric vehicles) and buildings (electric heating). As such, the majority of required global capacity additions, including the replacement of existing carbon-intensive power generation, is expected to come from carbon-free generation.
Technology Improvements. Technology advancements will continue to have a tremendous influence on world energy mix in the future. According to the BloombergNEF, solar photovoltaic (“PV”) capacity has grown 37% annually since 2000 and now accounts for approximately 10% of global power generation capacity. A primary reason for this growth has been technological advances throughout the solar value chain, resulting in an approximate 96% decline in PV module prices from $4.90 to $0.20 per watt over that same period, according to International Energy Agency. We believe that technological improvements in SMRs and other carbon-free generation sources will catalyze similar adoption trends going forward.
Economic and Reliability Requirements. Utilities are looking to deploy carbon-free power generation technologies due to a variety of economic and reliability drivers. Renewables, such as wind and solar, now have a levelized cost of electricity similar to that of many traditional forms of power and have become a focal point in the push to deploy carbon-free generation. However, renewables alone are not a practical solution for regional power grids and baseload generation is required to solve for factors such as intermittency, transmission constraints and land use limitations. In these cases, we believe that nuclear, and specifically SMRs, are the only viable carbon-free baseload power solution that can address the global need for carbon-free generation.
2


Regulatory Mandates and Government Funding. On December 8, 2021, President Biden signed an executive order mandating all electricity procured by the government be 100% carbon pollution-free by 2030, including at least 50% from around-the-clock dispatchable generation sources. The order also requires that federally owned buildings produce no net emissions by 2045 and that each federal agency achieve 100% zero-emission vehicle acquisitions by 2035. Additionally, on November 15, 2021, the U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was signed into law that includes $65 billion in funding for power and grid investments. This includes investments in grid reliability and resiliency as well as clean energy technologies such as carbon capture, hydrogen and advanced nuclear, including SMRs.
Internationally, more than 190 countries and the European Union have signed the Paris Agreement, which seeks to keep the rise in mean global temperature to below 2°C above pre-industrial levels. Currently, more than 130 countries, including China and the United States – the countries with the first and second largest CO2 emissions globally – have now set, or are considering setting, a target of reducing net emissions to zero by mid-century.
Social and Environmental Preferences. The effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and rising temperature, and the resulting health and socio-economic stability of at-risk populations, have led to a societal focus on the environment. As a result, a global shift is occurring in societal preferences for a reduction in greenhouse gases and a move towards carbon-free power.
Investor Pressures. ESG investing has accelerated as institutional investors shift their portfolios away from carbon‐intensive assets. According to a recent study by the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance, in 2020 approximately 36% of global assets under management are “sustainable investments” that consider ESG factors. This shift in investor sentiment has caused many large integrated energy companies, such as BP plc and Royal Dutch Shell plc, to set decarbonization strategies and diversify into different forms of carbon-free energy.
Our Market Opportunity
According to the NEO 2021, approximately 16,000 GW of carbon-free generation capacity additions are required globally through 2040 to meet domestic and international climate goals. These additions are a result of the growth in projected power use and the replacement of existing carbon-intensive generation, primarily from coal, oil and natural gas.
Although critical in helping meet climate goals, renewables, such as solar and wind, and hydroelectric are constrained due to intermittency, seasonality and issues associated with land use and grid interconnections. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average 2020 capacity factor (the ratio of actual power output over generation capacity) for solar, wind and hydro was 24.2%, 35.3%, and 40.7%, respectively, compared to 92.4% for nuclear. In most regions globally, flexible and dispatchable sources, such as long-duration storage, geothermal, gas, coal with carbon capture and nuclear will be essential. Among these sources, SMRs represent an attractive option based on their near-term viability, competitive costs, carbon-free emissions and reliability.
Market Opportunity and the Role of SMRs
SMRs are small nuclear reactors designed with scalable technology using module factory fabrication that pursue economies of series production and short construction times. The four primary technologies currently being pursued in SMRs are water-cooled reactors, fast neutron reactors, high temperature gas reactors and molten salt reactors. Light water reactors, such as our assetsNPM, are considered by the World Nuclear Association to have the lowest technological risk and are the most developed from a commercial perspective benefiting from decades of proven technology.
SMRs have a number of inherent advantages over traditional large-scale nuclear and other carbon-free power generation, including:

Simplicity of Design. Large scale nuclear plants, which typically generate 1 GW or more, are complex in terms of design and construction. SMRs are simpler to manufacture, construct, operate and maintain. SMRs are also designed to eliminate many of the nuclear components needed in large-scale plants which adds to their simplicity.
Enhanced Safety Features. Although our NPM is the only SMR with an NRC-approved safety case, according to the DOE, “small modular reactors have the potential for enhanced safety and security compared to earlier designs.” The smaller reactor core and reduced potential for off-site release from SMRs means SMRs may be located closer to population centers and industrial facilities needing process heat. The robust design, small fuel inventory, and multiple barriers preventing fission product release contribute to a low probability and consequence of radionuclide release, even under extreme upset conditions, thus simplifying the emergency preparedness and response and providing a basis for reducing the EPZ. NuScale is the only company to obtain approval of its EPZ methodology from the NRC (or any
3


other national government nuclear regulatory body) and NuScale is the only SMR developer to have an approved regulatory basis for obtaining a site boundary EPZ.
Economics versus Traditional Nuclear. Traditional large-scale nuclear facilities have high upfront capital costs due to the size of the power plants as well as long construction times. These plants require significant resource planning and utilities have hesitated to deploy the capital necessary to build large-scale nuclear plants because of these high costs. SMRs are simpler, smaller and the reactors are largely factory built, leading to shorter construction times and greater cost predictability.
Modular and Scalable. SMRs can more easily match customer needs and avoid surplus capacity. Modularity results in splitting power plant development between the factory and the field, reducing the schedule risk that has impacted large reactor construction projects. The NuScale modular design has the benefit to customers of being right-sizable upon construction and scalable over time.
Smaller Footprint. According to information published by E3 Consulting, we estimate that our SMR uses up to 99% less land per MWh compared to wind and solar projects. We expect this resource efficiency will also extend to construction materials, such as steel, cement, concrete and glass: according to a 2015 DOE study, nuclear power generators required 90% less construction material on a tons per terawatt-hour basis than wind and solar upstream collection systems and generators. Furthermore, SMRs can be sited closer to the end-user, significantly reducing the need for transmission infrastructure while also providing ancillary benefits such as process heat to end users.
Our Technology
Our NPM is the product of approximately 16 years of research and development by NuScale and key collaborators, including Oregon State University and the Idaho National Laboratory. Over $1.4 billion (including non-dilutive DOE grants) has been invested to date and the technology is protected by 655 issued and pending patents globally.
A NuScale power plant is composed of multiple NPMs. Each NPM is capable of producing 77 MWe. The NPM consists of an integral reactor composed of the reactor core, helical coil steam generators and pressurizer within the reactor pressure vessel, enclosed in a foreign countrysteel containment vessel. The reactor core consists of an array of fuel assemblies and substantiallycontrol rod clusters at standard enrichments. The helical coil steam generator consists of two independent sets of tube bundles with separate feedwater inlet and steam outlet lines. The integral reactor measures 65 feet tall and 9 feet in diameter. The containment vessel measures 76 feet tall and 15 feet in diameter and is much smaller and stronger than the concrete containment shells for large reactors. The NPM operates inside a stainless-steel lined water-filled pool located below ground level.
smr-20221231_g1.jpg
Our NPM technology leverages existing light water nuclear reactor technology and fuel that has been operating globally for over 60 years. The reactor operates using the principles of buoyancy-driven natural circulation; hence, no pumps are needed to circulate water through the reactor. Once the heated water reaches the top of the riser, it turns downward into an annulus where the hot water flows over the steam generator tubes. Water in the reactor system is kept separate from the
4


water inside the steam generator to prevent contamination. As the hot water in the reactor system passes over the hundreds of tubes in the steam generator, heat is transferred through the tube walls and the water inside the tubes turns to superheated steam. This innovative design eliminates the need for reactor coolant pumps, large bore piping, complex safety systems and other components found in conventional large-scale nuclear reactors. The result is a simplified system that improves safety and reduces capital and operational costs.
Design Features and Innovations
Our NPM introduces a number of key design innovations that allows us to be the safest and most reliable provider of nuclear energy. Our design features include:

Proven Technology. Our NPM design relies on well-established pressurized, light water reactor technology. As such, a VOYGR power plant can be licensed within the existing regulatory framework for light water reactors, drawing on a vast body of established research and development, proven codes and methods and existing regulatory standards. Because our technology was designed on the basis of this proven foundation, we believe NuScale has a significant advantage over other alternative and yet unproven nuclear technologies that may come to market, both with respect to obtaining regulatory approvals and attracting customer interest. NuScale received NRC Standard Design Approval for its 12-NPM, 50 MWe design in September 2020 and design certification in February 2023. NuScale has applied for NRC Standard Design Approval for its 6-NPM, 77 MWe design.
Single, Integrated Unit. The NPM incorporates all of the components for steam generation and heat exchange into a single integrated unit. This design eliminates all large bore interconnection piping, which is historically a potential source of failure and cause of construction complexity for large-scale reactors.
Compact Size. Each NPM, including the containment vessel, can be entirely fabricated in a factory and shipped by rail, truck, or barge to the power plant site for assembly and installation. Fabrication of the modules in a factory environment reduces fabrication cost, improves quality, reduces construction time and increases schedule predictability. This is a distinct benefit compared to traditional large-scale nuclear plants in which reactors are built on-site and only after their completion can the balance of the plant be constructed. We can fabricate our revenueNPMs in parallel with VOYGR power plant construction, saving time and reducing complexity, labor and construction costs.
Natural Circulation. The reactor core of our NPM is cooled entirely by natural circulation of water. Natural circulation provides a significant advantage in that it reduces capital and operational costs by eliminating reactor coolant pumps, pipes and valves and the associated power, maintenance and potential failures of those components.
Refueling and Maintenance Innovations. Each NPM can produce power continuously for approximately 20 months before refueling is required. Because of the multi-module design of VOYGR power plants, each NPM can be refueled in a staggered manner, reducing total plant output by only 77 MWe for approximately 10 days. This significantly reduces the cost of replacement power compared to large-scale nuclear plants (typically 1,000 MWe) that must shut down their entire capacity for any outage. Whereas large-scale nuclear plants can require as many as 1,000 or more individuals for refueling and associated outage activities, a VOYGR power plant can undergo the same refueling and outage activities with a much smaller, permanent, in-house crew of as few as 50 individuals.
Multi-Module Control Room. NuScale has designed, and received NRC approval for, an innovative control room that can control up to 12 NPMs with only three licensed operators. This compares with traditional large-scale nuclear plants that require a minimum six licensed operators for three reactors. This innovation is enabled by NuScale’s proprietary platform called the Highly Integrated Protection System (“HIPS”). The HIPS platform provides a robust safety platform to monitor NPMs and protect VOYGR power plants from potential cybersecurity attacks.
Safety Case

NuScale’s design innovations have allowed for a number of industry-first and best-in-class safety attributes.

Unlimited “coping period”. Our NPMs are designed with fully passive safety systems and are kept safe in a cooling condition for an unlimited time following any extreme event that renders a power plant without external power. During the span of such an event and for an unlimited time, the VOYGR power plant does not require any internal or external human or computer actions, AC or DC power or additional water to cool the reactors (referred to as NuScale’s Triple Crown For Nuclear Plant Safety). An unlimited coping period is unprecedented for commercial light water nuclear reactors. Historically, commercial light water nuclear reactors have maximum coping periods of 72 hours before operator action is required to keep the reactor safe.
Support for Site Boundary EPZ. NuScale’s VOYGR power plants have been designed to allow an NRC-approved EPZ that does not extend beyond the power plant site boundary (the restricted area controlled by the plant owner). The NRC has approved NuScale’s methodology for calculating EPZ size. This methodology, approved solely for
5


NuScale’s unique passively safe design, demonstrates that most NuScale plant sites in the U.S. can be approved with a 300-yard “site-boundary” EPZ. Currently operating commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S. are required to have a 10-mile radius EPZ from the reactor site and the population within the EPZ must be capable of evacuating within a specified time period. The smaller EPZ enables VOYGR power plants to be sited closer to end-users, which is of particular importance to process heat off-takers and to owners seeking to repower retiring coal-fired generation facilities.
No Requirement for Backup Power. The NRC concluded that NuScale’s safety design eliminates the need for “Class 1E” power – i.e., safety-related, backup power. This means that VOYGR power plants do not need costly emergency diesel generators to ensure the safety of the reactors in the event of a power loss. Today, no operating nuclear plant in the United States can make this claim.
Resilience to Man-made and Natural Events. The VOYGR reactor building is designed to withstand the impact from man-made and natural events, including floods, earthquakes (in excess of the Fukushima event), tornados and hurricanes in excess of 280 mph winds, and the impact of a large commercial airplane. The VOYGR power plant is also designed to safely shut down following an electromagnetic pulse or geomagnetic disturbance.
Technology-Enabled Operational Features
NuScale’s design innovations and best-in-class safety case create a number of technology-enabled operational features that no other carbon-free generation source can claim. These features address a host of critical industry needs with respect to grid resiliency and reliability and provide customers with related commercial benefits that other power generation solutions do not provide. Select features of NuScale’s VOYGR power plants include:

No Requirement for connection to the grid. The VOYGR plant is the only commercial nuclear power plant approved by the NRC without requiring any connections to the transmission grid for safety. This allows off-grid operation such that NuScale plants can be sited in the proximity of industries needing electricity and process heat. It also enables a NuScale plant to replace a coal fired power station located at the end of a single transmission line.
First Responder Power. When the transmission grid is lost, traditional large-scale nuclear power plants automatically and rapidly shutdown. Large-scale nuclear power plants are not capable of restarting, nor are they permitted to do so, until the transmission grid is restored because power from the grid (supplied by two off-site sources) is required to power the safety systems and operate the equipment necessary to start the power plant. The VOYGR power plant would remain at power, ready to immediately sell electricity to the grid when the grid is back online, making it a first responder to the restoration of the transmission grid.
Black-Start Capability. A VOYGR power plant can start up from cold conditions without external grid connections. This NuScale design capability is a first-of-a-kind for the nuclear industry.
Island Mode Power. A single NPM can supply all the “house load” electricity needs of the plant while also continuing to provide power to a local industrial customer or mission critical facility without external grid connection via a micro-grid connection.
Highly Reliable Power. VOYGR-12 power plants will be able to provide 154 MWe of power to mission critical facilities with 99.95% availability over the 60-year life of the plant. In the event of a catastrophic loss of offsite grid and disruption of transportation infrastructure, a VOYGR-12 will be able to provide up to 120 MWe to a mission critical facility micro-grid for at least four years without refueling.
6


Design Validation and Testing
smr-20221231_g2.jpg
NuScale’s safety design has been validated through rigorous testing of critical components, such as fuel assemblies, control rod and control rod mechanisms and the integral helical coil steam generators. NuScale has constructed an electrically-heated, one-third scale, full-pressure and temperature integral thermal-hydraulic test facility that demonstrates the operation of the entire nuclear steam supply system and safety systems.
In addition, we have proven the ability to safely operate 12 NPMs from a single control room by building and operating a full-scale simulated control room. Through comprehensive testing in this simulator, NuScale has shown that the demands on the reactor operators are significantly reduced compared with traditional large reactors, as a result of the simplicity of the design, advancements in digital controls, and the fact that NuScale’s design requires no operator-initiated safety functions for all design basis events. Through comprehensive analyses, demonstrations and audits, the NRC has approved NuScale’s conduct of operation such that three licensed operators can safely operate a VOYGR-12 plant without the need for a Shift Technical Advisor, a key safety-related role required by the NRC for all existing large-scale nuclear plants.
Products and Services
NuScale has determined that it currently operates in a single segment and will periodically reassess that determination as it nears commercialization and deployment of its NPMs.
NuScale Power Modules and NuScale VOYGR Power Plants

NuScale currently offers VOYGR power plant designs for three facility sizes that are scalable in that they are capable of housing from one to four, six or twelve NPMs. For each of these plant configurations, the total facility gross electric output can be as much as 308 MWe, 462 MWe or 924 MWe, respectively, based on a nameplate capacity of each NPM of 77 MWe.This scalability allows customers to right-size their up-front capital investment and economically increase installed capacity over time through the addition of NPMs as needed.

A customer seeking to deploy a VOYGR power plant will be granted a license from NuScale to construct, operate, maintain and decommission the VOYGR plant. NuScale will also provide design and nuclear regulatory licensing basis information necessary for the customer to obtain regulatory approval to construct and operate the power plant. In exchange for this license, the customer will pay an upfront technology licensing fee to NuScale.

Sale of NuScale Power Modules.In addition to the customer paid technology license, NuScale also expects to sell to the customer major nuclear engineered equipment. For the VOYGR power plant, this will consist of the NPMs, the reactor building crane, module assembly equipment and other equipment associated with the nuclear steam supply system and nuclear fuel handling. NuScale expects to provide the manufacturing and delivery of modules to the customers’ VOYGR power plant site on a contracted basis. NuScale also expects to receive payment related to the fabrication of the NPMs
7


coincident with the order of materials and commencement of manufacturing so that no working capital will be required from NuScale for work-in-progress or finished inventory.
The VOYGR-12, VOYGR-6 and VOYGR-4 can each commence operation with as few as one module and scale to house as many as twelve, six or four modules, respectively. This scalability allows customers to right-size their up-front capital investment and economically increase installed capacity over time through the addition of NPMs as needed.
Services

We will also offer customers a diversified suite of services throughout the life of the power plant, beginning approximately eight years prior to a plant’s commercial operation date. Pre- and post-operation date service offerings provide customers with critical services related to the licensing, design, development, constructing, operation and maintenance of the VOYGR power plant. As a first mover and developer of the power plant’s nuclear technology, we believe we are well positioned to be a trusted service provider. As such, we anticipate our services will have high penetration rates and will provide consistent, recurring revenues that could become significant once a large number of VOYGR plants are in operation.
Our services include:
regulatory licensing support, including in the United States preparation and prosecution support for the customer’s desired regulatory approval regimes under either 10 CFR, Part 50 or Part 52 pursuant to U.S. NRC regulations;
start-up testing and commissioning support;
training to support initial and ongoing power plant operations;
management of all aspects of the U.S. NRC required inspections, tests, analysis and acceptance criteria process;
NPM mechanical handling;
initial and ongoing fuel bundle loading and movement;
design engineering management during commercial operation;
operations and maintenance program management, including regulatory compliance reporting support;
procurement and spare parts management;
nuclear fuel management including reload analysis;
outage planning and execution support; and
system verification and validation for safety and non-safety systems.
Competitive Strengths
Only Viable Carbon-free Baseload Power. Nuclear is the only viable carbon-free baseload power available to address the global need for carbon-free generation and to meet decarbonization targets year-round. Traditional baseload technologies, such as gas and coal, are carbon intensive; traditional nuclear is costly, complex and frequently subject to cost-overruns; and hydroelectric power is dependent on geography, rainfall, curtailment and other factors. Renewables such as wind and solar are intermittent and weather dependent, and batteries have not been scaled to make these viable baseload power sources. SMRs such as NuScale’s VOYGR power plants provide highly reliable, cost-effective, carbon-free baseload power to electric grids – no other existing baseload technology can claim the same benefits on the scale needed to address the world’s growing needs.
Innovative Technology Platform and Intellectual Property Portfolio. We have 469 patents issued and an additional 186 patents pending. These 655 patents protect key aspects of our technology, and we continue to grow our intellectual property portfolio. In addition, we have a highly educated workforce of 556 employees, of whom 248 have master’s degrees in engineering and science and 29 have Ph.Ds. We believe our intellectual property rights, as well as our highly skilled personnel are important assets necessary to maintain our competitive advantage in the market and expand on our technology platform.
First to Receive an SDA from the NRC. Although China and Russia have currently operating SMRs, ours is the first and only SMR to receive a Standard Design Approval (SDA) from the NRC. This is an important regulatory milestone that provides customers with certainty – knowing that the NRC approves of the plant design – before committing significant capital to develop a nuclear facility. The SDA process took NuScale 41 months to complete – including preparation, application and receipt of approval. This was the fastest any nuclear reactor company has ever received approval from the NRC. To date, no SMR or advanced reactor company other than NuScale has even applied to the NRC for SMR design approval. We believe that this, and the fact that our design approval timeline was based on well-established light water nuclear technology, provides NuScale with a solid competitive advantage over other SMR competitors.
Unparalleled Safety Case. NuScale’s innovative, fully passive safety system design addresses the historical concerns of traditional large-scale nuclear power plants. In the event of a total loss of power to the facility, a VOYGR power plant does
8


not require any operator or computer actions, grid connection or emergency backup power or additional water to cool the reactors and can remain safe indefinitely. All large-scale nuclear reactors require one or all three of these within a period of days. The rigorously tested safety case results in an array of applications and commercial opportunities for NuScale that traditional nuclear power plants cannot support, and VOYGR power plants can be located closer to end-users and population centers.
Global Network of Strategic Investors and Supply Chain Partners with DOE SupportWe have developed a global network of blue-chip supply chain partners, many of which are investors in NuScale. We believe these partners will play a critical role in the successful procurement and fabrication of components, manufacture of our NPMs and fuel supply. In addition, we have also received significant financial and regulatory support from the DOE since the inception of NuScale. No other SMR or advanced nuclear technology has received the level of awards or grants (combined, among us and our customers) that the NuScale design has, and we maintain a strong relationship with the DOE.
Cost-Competitive. We are cost-competitive in the United States, where the prevailing wholesale cost of baseload electricity is relatively low, and we are even more competitive globally where the baseload cost of electricity is typically higher. However, when customers decide on a generation technology, headline cost is not the only consideration. Our technology’s reliability, resiliency and flexibility are key attributes both customers and regulators value that are not captured in LCOE. We believe our competitive cost coupled with our differentiated capabilities gives us an advantage to other technologies.
Visionary Management Team. We have an experienced and passionate team of leaders and innovators who have developed the technology over the years and run the operations of the business today. Our management team has an average of over 8 years at NuScale (founded 16 years ago) and 35 years of commercial and energy industry experience. Our executives have extensive prior management experience in nuclear and engineering organizations, such as the NRC, United States Navy, DOE, General Electric Company, Exelon Corporation, Framatome, Babcock & Wilcox Company, LLC and others. Among key members of NuScale’s executive leadership team is Dr. José N. Reyes, Ph.D., co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of the Company. Dr. Reyes is co-designer of the NuScale SMR and is an internationally recognized expert on passive safety system design, testing and operations for nuclear power plants. Dr. Reyes has served as a technical expert at the International Atomic Energy Agency and as an engineer with the Reactor Safety Division of the NRC. He is Professor Emeritus in the School of Nuclear Science and Engineering at Oregon State University, was inducted into the National Academy of Engineering in 2018 and holds over 150 patents granted or pending in 20 countries.
Competition
Our competitors are other power generation technologies, including traditional baseload, renewables, long duration storage and other nuclear reactors, including SMRs. We believe our competitive strengths differentiate us from our competition globally, in part because NuScale’s SMR technology is currently the only NRC-approved SMR technology capable of meeting the growing demand for carbon-free baseload generation.
Traditional Baseload. According to BloombergNEF, approximately 62% of global generation capacity in 2020 was natural gas, coal, oil and large-scale nuclear. These technologies are highly reliable, cost-effective, dispatchable and land use efficient. However, with the exception of traditional large-scale nuclear, these resources are carbon-intensive and we expect them to largely be replaced with carbon-free generation over time. Traditional large-scale nuclear power plants, while carbon-free, require significant upfront capital expenditures, have a history of extensive construction times, complex safety systems and do not have business cases apart from utility-scale generation. We believe our carbon-free SMR technology contains all of the positive attributes of traditional baseload and addresses many of the flaws of traditional nuclear power plants.
Renewables. According to BloombergNEF, approximately 38% of global generation capacity in 2020 was wind, solar, hydroelectric and other renewable power generation sources. Although these sources generate carbon-free power, wind and solar are highly intermittent and non-dispatchable, and hydroelectric is seasonal and subject to curtailment. Additionally, since renewables are weather-dependent, they are too unreliable to support certain end-use cases, including mission-critical applications or industrial applications that require extensive on-site, always-available power. Due to their innovative design NuScale VOYGR plants can operate as baseload generation, load-follow renewables and/or support key industrial applications.
Other Advanced Nuclear Reactors. There are several reactor technologies that are in various stages of development, such as high temperature gas-cooled reactors, fast reactors, molten salt reactors, fusion technologies and others, and commercial SMRs are currently operating in China and Russia. These technologies, like ours, are designed to be clean, safe and highly
9


reliable. However, these technologies have not received regulatory approval in the United States, and many of the technologies have not been demonstrated and do not have fuel supply infrastructure in existence. Currently, we have the only SMR that has received a Standard Design Approval from the NRC, and no other SMR company or customer has even applied for approval. Achieving Standard Design Approval is a regulatory process that took us over $500 million to prepare and 41 months and over $200 million to complete.
Customers
NuScale’s potential customers include governments, political subdivisions, state-owned enterprises, investor-owned utilities and other commercial and industrial companies, both in domestic and international markets. Our end-markets can be broken down into two general subsets: baseload generation and industrial applications. Baseload generation includes repurposing coal-fired facilities to nuclear or new clean baseload capacity. Many industrial customers require significant energy needs such as chemical plants, direct air capture facilities, hydrogen production facilities, oil refineries, metal smelters and water desalination plants. Our technology can provide the necessary reliable electricity and heat energy to these facilities in an environmentally efficient manner.

Today we have a pipeline of over 120 customer opportunities globally which range from customer leads to a contracted customer. We currently have two contracts in place with UAMPS and RoPower that have stated commercial operation dates in 2029-2030. We also currently have 17 MOUs in place with both utility and industrial customers across North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. MOUs are an important step toward advancing to a definitive contracted customer and we believe many of these MOUs will convert into signed contracts over time. In December 2022, we completed our Standard Plant Design (“SPD”), which provides potential customers with a generic VOYGR power plant design that will serve as a starting point for deploying site-specific designs, including supporting client licensing and deployment activities. Prospective customers in the United States are gaining an understanding of the potential benefits from the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which provides production tax credits for existing nuclear power plants but, more importantly, for new nuclear power plants and specifically for advanced reactors and small modular reactors. International customers seeking to decarbonize and meet climate change goals are increasingly looking at NuScale Plants as their means to meet energy needs and carbon-reduction goals.
UAMPS. UAMPS is our first customer. UAMPS is a political subdivision of the State of Utah that provides energy services to public power systems in six western states. UAMPS plans to deploy a NuScale VOYGR-6 power plant for its CFPP located at the Idaho National Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho. The DOE issued a Site Use Permit to UAMPS for the CFPP in February 2016, and the final site was selected in July 2019. In October 2020, the DOE approved a $1.4 billion multi-year cost share award to UAMPS' wholly owned subsidiary, CFPP LLC, to fund the development and construction of the CFPP. In 2020, UAMPS started site characterization activities necessary for licensing and construction for the CFPP site. The anticipated commercial operation date for the plant, based on UAMPS schedule, is 2029. We are currently under contract to provide various services to CFPP including support of license applications, startup and testing, initial training and initial fuel services. Additional details regarding, and risks associated with, our arrangements with UAMPS is described in “Risk Factors—Commercialization Risk Factors—We may be derivedunable to charge UAMPS, our first customer, for some costs we have incurred and we may be required to reimburse UAMPS if we fail to achieve specified performance measures.”
RoPower/SNN. On November 4, 2021, NuScale and Nuclearelectrica, a national energy company in Romania that produces electricity, heat and nuclear fuel, signed a teaming agreement to advance the delivery of NuScale’s SMR technology, then expected to be as early as 2027. NuScale and RoPower Nuclear S.A. (RoPower), owned in equal shares by S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. and Nova Power & Gas S.A., announced on January 4, 2023, that a contract for Front-End Engineering and Design (FEED) work was signed between parties on December 28, 2022, marking a significant step toward the deployment of a NuScale VOYGR small modular reactor (SMR) power plant in Romania by 2029.
Other Potential Customers. We have signed non-binding MOUs with 17 potential customers around the world, including in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Potential customers with which we have publicly announced MOUs include Bruce Power, CEZ Group, Grant County PUD, Shearwater Energy, Prodigy Clean Energy Ltd., Energoatom, Kazakhstan Nuclear Power Plant and Kozloduy NPP – New Build Plc.

Growth Strategy
We intend to grow our business by leveraging our competitive advantages in scalability, safety, reliability and cost. We have a number of avenues to achieve our growth objectives:
10


Traditional and New Applications. We believe the market for NuScale VOYGR power plants is wherever non-intermittent, reliable, carbon-free power is needed. Initially, we are focused on replacing carbon intensive coal-fired power plants and as an alternative to new-build gas-fired generation. Additionally, we are focused on marketing VOYGR power plants to industrial and micro-grid customers in sectors that include direct air capture, water desalinization, hydrogen production and mission critical facilities.
International Customer Development. We continue to develop our international customer base as we foresee a majority of our customer demand over the long-term to be outside of the United States. Our team puts significant effort into developing dialogue with foreign governments and corporations in order to educate and market our technology. The 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference and other global climate events have generated significant inbound interest from potential global customers. We will continue to strengthen relations with these parties to accelerate sales globally. In our sales pipeline we have identified more than 45 potential customers with interest in exploring nuclear power for their baseload needs.
Technology Advancements. Using our innovative technology platform and robust intellectual property portfolio, NuScale is well-positioned to continue making technology advancements over time. These improvements include increasing power output, simplifying operations, reducing construction time and reducing production cost. Just as we increased power to 77 MWe per module without increasing module size or construction costs, our R&D team is continuously researching and developing ways to improve our technology and meet our customers’ energy needs – creating top line growth opportunities and potential for additional margin capture by NuScale over time.
Development of New Products. We continue to explore the development of innovative new products based on our core NPM technology. For example, we are developing a micro-reactor for niche end-markets. Our micro-reactor design is a 0.01 MWe to 10 MWe module intended to supply power to remote, off-grid and small communities. Use applications could include mining, universities, space power, military installations and disaster relief. These micro-reactors are expected to be small, compact, highly reliable, fully automated and rapidly deployable.
Supply Chain
We have an established global supply chain ecosystem for all NPM components and for the construction of VOYGR power plants. We also have strategic and commercial partnerships in place globally that allow us to outsource the manufacturing of key NPM components, including the upper and lower reactor pressure vessels (riser and core internals), the steam generator and the upper and lower containment vessels.
We are working with suppliers, such as Doosan Enerbility; Precision Custom Components; Sarens; Curtiss-Wright Corporation; and IHI, among others, who we expect to build components of NPMs to our specifications. Other key suppliers include Framatome, SA (fuel assemblies), Honeywell International Inc. (control systems), Paragon Energy Solutions (protection systems), Sensia LLC (sensors and instrumentation) and PaR Systems, Inc. (reactor building crane).
Partnerships

Fluor. Fluor, a leading global EPC firm, is the majority stockholder in NuScale and collaborates with NuScale on plant design and is a provider of engineering, project management, procurement and construction services. A number of the strategic investors including Fluor have business collaboration agreements with NuScale, under which the strategic investors have rights to perform engineering, procurement, construction and other specified services for NuScale.
DOE. The U.S. Department of Energy has granted NuScale four separate cost-share awards totaling more than $656.0 million to develop, certify and commercialize our SMR technology. DOE-funded research in 2003 helped accelerate the development of NuScale’s SMR prior to forming NuScale in 2007. In addition to the DOE awards made to NuScale, UAMPS, our first customer, has received a $1.4 billion DOE cost-share award to support deployment of a NuScale VOYGR-6 power plant.
Strategic Investors. NuScale has a global network of strategic investors and supply chain partners that we expect to play an integral role in bringing our technology to market around the world. In addition to Fluor, existing strategic investors and supply chain partners include Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction, Sargent & Lundy, Sarens, JGC Holdings, IHI, GS Energy and Samsung C&T.
11


Collaboration with Academic Institutions. NuScale has benefited from independent research, peer-reviewed studies and testing conducted by and with academic institutions, including Oregon State University, Boise State, Colorado School of Mines, University of Houston, University of Idaho, Kansas State, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, POLIMI (Italy), University of Sheffield (U.K.), University of Tennessee, Texas A&M, Utah State University, University of Utah, University of Wisconsin and University of Wyoming.
Other Collaboration. NuScale has been working with the International Atomic Energy Agency and regulators in Canada, Japan, the U.K. and Ukraine, and will be or are supporting our customers’ engagement with regulators in other international jurisdictions. We expect that our strategic relationships with governmental agencies will help facilitate the licensing our SMR in the United States and abroad, and that our relationships with experienced private companies, which have offices and projects in countries with potential NuScale customers, will allow us to reach customers globally.
Intellectual Property
As of December 31, 2022, NuScale had been issued 469 patents globally, and had 186 pending patents. These 655 patents, filed across 22 jurisdictions including in the U.S., protect key aspects of our technology and continue to grow our intellectual property portfolio. We believe our intellectual property rights are important assets for our success and we aggressively protect these rights to maintain our competitive advantage in the market.

We own all necessary rights to the intellectual property associated with our technology to allow any capable manufacturer the ability to fabricate or build to print all components of the NPM. We also commissioned and own the rights to a NuScale standard plant design, giving customers significant cost savings in designing and engineering the balance of plant needed for electricity generation. Approximately one-third of our patent portfolio relates to our safety system, one-third relates to power production and the remaining third to other categories such country.as software and to the reactor module, operability, modularity and inspection. NuScale’s proprietary module protection system was developed in-house and has been approved by the NRC. We manage our patent portfolio to maximize the lifecycle of protecting our intellectual property, and various components and aspects of our system are protected by patents that will expire at staggered times.
Research & Development
The NuScale team has spent 16 years on R&D and testing and invested over $1.4 billion (including non-dilutive DOE grants) to date to develop its technology. Prior to forming our company in 2007, the DOE funded research from 2000 to 2003 to develop the fundamental concept for our SMR. Our current R&D efforts are centered on innovative plant operations and services, introducing new product innovations, improving plant quality and lowering the lifecycle cost of our NPMs and VOYGR plants. The R&D team is also involved in developing new innovative technologies that will represent future product offerings of NuScale, including advanced micro-reactor technologies.
Human Capital
As of December 31, 2022, we had 556 full-time employees with an aggregate of 248 advanced degrees, including 168 master’s degrees in engineering and science and 29 Ph.Ds. Twelve percent of our engineers are veterans. Our workforce is concentrated in the Portland and Corvallis, Oregon areas, but we have employees working in 39 states and the District of Columbia. We have a seasoned leadership team with over 250 years of cumulative experience in the nuclear industry. Our management team places significant focus and attention on matters concerning our human capital assets, particularly our diversity, capability development and succession planning. Accordingly, we regularly review employee development and succession plans for each of our functions to identify and develop our pipeline of talent.
Approximately 27% of our full-time employees are women and 16% belong to historically underrepresented groups. Two of our executive officers are women, and one executive officer belongs to a historically underrepresented group in the science and technology sectors. NuScale is a signatory to the International Energy Agency Clean Energy Ministerial’s “Equal by 30 Campaign”, a public commitment to increase the number of women in the clean energy sector by 2030.

Information about our current Executive Officers and other Significant Employees
Name(1)
AgePosition
John L. Hopkins69Chief Executive Officer, Director
José N. Reyes67Chief Technical Officer
Chris Colbert58Chief Financial Officer
12


Robert Temple66General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Thomas Mundy62President VOYGR Services & Delivery
Clayton Scott61Executive Vice President, Business Development
Scott Bailey61Vice President, Supply Chain
Carl Britsch59Vice President, Human Resources
Robert Gamble60Vice President, Engineering
Diane Hughes47Vice President, Marketing & Communications
Karin Feldman45Vice President, Program Management
Thomas Bergman60Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
(1) Dale Atkinson, the Company’s former Chief Operating Officer, retired effective January 5, 2023. Information about Mr. Atkinson may be found in the Company’s SEC Form S-1, declared effective June 30, 2022. Karin Feldman is serving as interim Chief Operating Officer and Chief Nuclear Officer while a search for Mr. Atkinson’s replacement is under way.

John L. Hopkins has served as NuScale’s chief executive officer and on its board of directors since December 2012, and he served as its executive chairman from December 2012 to December 2021. Before that, Mr. Hopkins was with Fluor Corporation, one of the world’s largest publicly traded engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction and maintenance companies. Mr. Hopkins started his career at Fluor Corporation in 1989, held numerous leadership positions in both global operations and business development, and served as a corporate officer from 1999 until 2012. Mr. Hopkins is active in a variety of professional and business organizations, and currently serves on the Executive Committee, Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of the United States Chamber of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; he was formerly the Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the Executive Committee. Mr. Hopkins served with the DOE’s Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee from 2019 to 2020, and is currently a member of the Nuclear Energy Institute Executive Committee and Energy Task Force Member, Atlantic Council and the Group of Vienna. He was a senior energy policy advisor of I Squared Capital, New York. He has also served as the senior executive member of both the Fluor Netherlands and Fluor United Kingdom board of directors; chairman of the board for Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC; and as a director of the Business Council for International Understanding. Mr. Hopkins is qualified to serve as a director based on his knowledge of NuScale and its operations, his strategic relationships with NuScale partners, and his extensive experience in management and with the nuclear industry and with engineering and construction.

José N. Reyes, Ph.D., co-founded NuScale LLC and co-designed the NuScale passively-cooled small nuclear reactor. Dr. Reyes has served as our chief technology officer since 2007. Dr. Reyes is an internationally recognized expert on passive safety system design, testing and operations for nuclear power plants. He has served as a United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency technical expert on passive safety systems. He is a co-inventor on over 110 patents granted or pending in 20 countries. He has received several national awards including the 2013 Nuclear Energy Advocate Award, the 2014 American Nuclear Society Thermal Hydraulic Division Technical Achievement Award, the 2017 Nuclear Infrastructure Council Trailblazer Award, and the 2021 American Nuclear Society Walter H. Zinn Medal. He is a fellow of the American Nuclear Society and a member of the National Academy of Engineering. Dr. Reyes served as head of the OSU Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Health Physics from 2006-2009. He directed the Advanced Thermal Hydraulic Research Laboratory and was the co-director of the Battelle Energy Alliance Academic Center of Excellence for Thermal Fluids and Reactor Safety in support of the Idaho National Laboratory mission from 1994-2009. Additionally, Dr. Reyes was the OSU principal investigator for the AP600 and AP1000 design certification test programs sponsored by the NRC, the DOE and Westinghouse from 1990-2005. He currently serves as a Professor Emeritus in the School of Nuclear Science and Engineering. He holds Ph.D. and Master of Science degrees in nuclear engineering from the University of Maryland, and a Bachelor of Science degree in nuclear engineering from the University of Florida. He is the author of numerous journal articles and technical reports, including a book chapter on SMRs for an ASME B&PV Codes and Standards handbook. He has given lectures and keynote addresses to professional nuclear organizations in the United States, Europe and Asia.

Chris Colbert has served as our chief financial officer since February 2021. Prior to this, he served as our chief strategy officer from 2014 and our chief operating officer from 2011. Mr. Colbert joined NuScale from UniStar Nuclear Energy, LLC, where he was senior vice president for Projects and Services from 2007 to 2011. While at UniStar, Mr. Colbert was responsible for the deployment of the United States EPR at UniStar’s existing nuclear power plant sites and the provision of licensing and other project development services to other United States EPR projects. Before joining UniStar, Mr. Colbert worked for a number of companies over nearly 15 years developing and financing over 6500 MW of fossil-fueled power projects. Mr. Colbert began his career at GE Aircraft Engines as an engineer and later transferred to the General
13


Electric Company Corporate Audit Staff. Mr. Colbert holds a B.S. in electrical engineering and a minor in computer science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an M.B.A. from the Walter A. Haas School of Business in Berkeley, CA. He is also a chartered financial analyst.

Robert (Bob) Temple has served as general counsel and secretary of NuScale since 2016. Before NuScale, Mr. Temple served as general counsel and corporate secretary for Toshiba America Energy Systems Corporation (“TAES”) from 2015 to 2016, and as general counsel and corporate secretary for Toshiba America Nuclear Energy Corporation. Before joining TAES, Mr. Temple was assistant general counsel for The Babcock & Wilcox Company from 2010-2015, where he served as the chief legal advisor for Babcock & Wilcox Nuclear Energy, Inc. and Babcock & Wilcox mPower, Inc., as well as the general counsel and secretary for Generation mPower LLC. Mr. Temple joined Babcock & Wilcox in 2011 from the Washington, D.C. office of Haynes and Boone, LLP. During his career in private law practice, Mr. Temple worked as an associate, of counsel, or partner in the Chicago and Washington, D.C. offices of the law firms of Winston & Strawn, Hopkins & Sutter and McGuireWoods. Mr. Temple was Deputy General Counsel, vice president and secretary at CPS Energy from 2004 to 2009 and served as an in-house attorney with Commonwealth Edison (now Exelon) from 1995 to 1997. Before becoming an attorney, Mr. Temple was a licensed senior reactor operator at LaSalle County Station and served in the United States Navy aboard nuclear submarines. Mr. Temple received his J.D. from Illinois Institute of Technology’s Chicago-Kent College of Law (1995) and received his Bachelor of Science degree from Southern Illinois University (1988).

Thomas (Tom) Mundy has served as NuScale’s chief commercial officer since 2017. Mr. Mundy oversees commercial global business activities, including all marketing, communications, business development and sales, and services functions for the United States and abroad. Prior to this position, Mr. Mundy served as Managing Director for the United Kingdom and Europe from 2015 to 2017, where he was responsible for establishing NuScale’s business presence. Mr. Mundy initially joined NuScale in 2012 as the vice president of Program Management and was responsible for the timeliness and budget performance of major internal projects. Before NuScale, Mr. Mundy served as founding chief executive officer and president of Exelon Nuclear Partners, LLC, a subsidiary of Exelon Generation Company, LLC from 2009 to 2012 and as Vice President of Nuclear Development from 2007 to 2009. In addition to the various positions Mr. Mundy has held in Exelon’s energy delivery, nuclear, and fossil generation organizations, he has also held positions with GPU Nuclear Corporation and the Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company from 1986 to 1988 and 1982 to 1986, respectively. He was certified as a boiling-water reactor (“BWR”) Shift Technical Advisor and is a licensed attorney in Pennsylvania and New Jersey where he has practiced for several years. Mr. Mundy holds a B.S. in marine engineering from the United States Merchant Marine Academy, a Master of Engineering Administration degree from George Washington University, and a J.D. (with honors) from Temple University Beasley School of Law. Mundy is also a registered patent attorney.

Clayton Scott joined NuScale on January 10, 2022 as Executive Vice President, Business Development. He is responsible for the global sales, marketing and communications for NuScale. Mr. Scott brings more than 40 years of diverse global experiences allowing him the ability to open markets and raise brand awareness, in addition to having closed over $2.5B USD in sales globally. Prior to NuScale, from February 2018 to December 2021 he was a Senior Vice President — Global Sales, Deputy Director I&C Business Unit for Framatome, responsible for the global I&C sales, P&L within the group and a global footprint of more than 2000 staff. Driving new business at the Ministry levels in Russia, China, Uzbekistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and others. Prior to Framatome, from January 2014 to February 2018 Mr. Scott served as the Chief Nuclear Officer for Schneider Electric, responsible for the company’s global nuclear organization, with offices and facilities in North America, Europe/MENA, and Asia. Before accepting this position, Scott served as the Chief Nuclear Officer of Invensys’s global nuclear business. He was appointed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to chair a taskforce on harmonizing digital licensing issues globally. He is a frequent lecturer on various topics within the energy sector. He is a member of the University of Tennessee Advisory Board, and member of the Xiamen University Advisory Board in China. Formally, Chairman of Board for the newly created Framatome Company in South Korea. Scott carries dual citizenship between the US and Canada, in which he has a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from the University of California, Irvine, Leading with Finance from the Harvard Business School online, and began his career as an instrumentation technologist for Ontario Hydro, where he was involved in commissioning and startup of four CANDU units at the Pickering Nuclear Power Station in Ontario, Canada.

Scott Bailey has served as our vice president of Supply Chain since January 2011 and leads all aspects of NuScale’s supply chain function including internal procurement operations and supply chain development and manufacturing. Before joining NuScale, Mr. Bailey was the director of supply chain, nuclear generation, development and construction for the Tennessee Valley Authority (2009-2010). Mr. Bailey previously held senior supply chain management and consulting positions for NRG Energy (2007-2009), Sequoia Consulting Group (2004-2007), Pantellos (2001-2004) and Maine Yankee Atomic
14


Power Company (1986-2001). Mr. Bailey holds a master’s degree in business from Husson University (1991) and a B.S. in marine engineering from Maine Maritime Academy (1983).

Carl Britsch has served as NuScale’s vice president of Human Resources since 2015. Before NuScale, Mr. Britsch worked in human resources for a wide variety of industries including automotive, logistics, oilfield services and energy. Early in his career, Mr. Britsch spent nearly 10 years with Ford Motor Company including roles in two Ford Assembly plants and a role in the United Kingdom. Mr. Britsch has led the human resources functions for Loomis Armored, a global cash logistics company and two Houston-based oilfield services companies. Mr. Britsch has a master’s degree in government administration from the University of Pennsylvania and a J.D. from Brigham Young University.

Robert Gamble, Ph.D., has served as NuScale’s vice president of Engineering since 2016, and is responsible for design of the NuScale Structures, Systems and Components, Nuclear Safety Analysis, Fuels, Testing and Code Development, and Engineering Support Programs. Dr. Gamble led major portions of the international technology program and NRC pre-application review for GE’s Economic Simplified BWR Gen 3 light water reactor. Subsequently, he led design finalization and the DCA to the NRC. Before that, he worked on design and licensing activities on the GE Advance BWR and Simplified BWR light water reactors. Prior to working on light-water reactors, Dr. Gamble worked on the development of the sodium cooled advanced liquid metal reactor and super power reactor innovative small module fast reactors as well as the Lithium cooled SP-100 space reactor, developing key aspects of the thermal hydraulic systems and technology development infrastructure. As vice president of Mechanical Design and Analysis Group, Dr. Gamble and his staff were responsible for the design and analysis of reactor pressure vessels, internals and piping, structural and vibrations analysis, seismic and dynamic analysis, fracture mechanics, and emergent outage work including diagnoses, evaluation, repair and replacement of all vessel hardware of the global operating fleet of GE BWRs. Before NuScale LLC, Dr. Gamble served as the vice president of Engineering and general manager for North American Operations for Areva Solar from 2012 to 2016. Dr. Gamble received his PhD, M.S. and B.S. in mechanical engineering from UC Berkeley and is a graduate of the Harvard Business School Executive Management Training Program.

Diane Hughes has served as NuScale’s vice president of Marketing and Communications since August 2017, leads all aspects of NuScale’s marketing and communication functions, including brand, marketing, external communication (public relations, media relations and public affairs), digital experience (web, social media and digital channels) and internal communication. Before joining NuScale, Ms. Hughes served as director of social media and digital experience/marketing at NextEra Energy, Inc./Florida Power & Light Company from 2013 to 2017. Ms. Hughes previously held positions at Baltimore Gas and Electric Company from 2010 to 2013, the Greater Baltimore Committee from 2005 to 2010, Hermann Advertising Design/Communications from 2003 to 2004 and contracted by MaCS GmbH to support Hewlett-Packard’s public relations division in Germany from 2000 to 2002. Ms. Hughes received a Bachelor of Arts in International Business and Management and a Master of Science in Management Technology: E-Business from the University of Maryland.

Karin Feldman has served as NuScale’s vice president, Program Management Office since January 2019. She is responsible for leading NuScale’s project and program management and establishing and maintaining project management, project controls, cost estimating, and risk management standards. Before assuming this role, Ms. Feldman served as NuScale’s director of planning and integration (2016-2018) and the program management office risk manager (2012-2016). Before joining NuScale, from 2008 to 2012 Ms. Feldman was the chief executive officer of Zero Point Frontiers Corp. a small business start-up that provided technical and programmatic support to United States government and commercial space programs. Ms. Feldman started her career at The Aerospace Corporation (2000-2008), a federally-funded research and development center, where provided risk planning and assessment support for United States Air Force and NASA programs. Ms. Feldman holds a B.S. in nuclear engineering and radiological sciences from the University of Michigan and a master’s degree in nuclear engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Thomas Bergman has served as our vice president of Regulatory Affairs since 2014, and is responsible for all licenses, certifications, relationships, and activities related to regulation of nuclear safety and security, environmental protection, and emergency management domestically and internationally. Mr. Bergman previously worked at the NRC where his most recently held positions were in the Office of New Reactors as the deputy director for licensing operations (2006-2009) and the director of the Division of Engineering (2009-2014). Other positions at the NRC included in the Office of the Executive Director for Operations (2000-2006), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (1990-2006, 2013), Region III (2005), Region IV (2013) and the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (2006). Before working at the NRC, Mr. Bergman worked for ARINC Research Corporation (1989-1990) and the Naval Nuclear propulsion Directorate. Mr. Bergman holds an M.B.A. from the University of Maryland and a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Michigan.
15


Mr. Bergman is currently enrolled in the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School and graduated in February 2022.

Nuclear Safety Regulation
The commercial nuclear industry is heavily regulated in all countries, and regulatory approval is required for the design, construction and operation of every nuclear plant. Generally, nuclear safety regulators consider (1) design safety and robustness against internal hazards (e.g., component failures and fires) and external hazards (e.g., earthquakes and weather loads such as snow, rain and wind), and (2) environmental impacts of construction and operations (e.g., water use and preservation of historical sites and animal and plant species). Regulation must be addressed on a country-by-country basis, although regulators often collaborate when a design is deployed in multiple countries.
Our licensing strategy has two goals: (1) obtain approval in the shortest possible time by engaging the regulator early and developing high quality applications; and (2) maintain a common design of the NPM in as many markets as possible by leveraging the highly regarded NRC Standard Design Approval during each regulatory approval process.
Nuclear Safety Regulatory Approval in the United States
We submitted a Design Certification Application (“DCA”) in December 2016 to the NRC, comprising 12,000 pages, with approximately 2,000,000 pages of additional documentation and 100 gigabytes of test data. Development of the DCA required approximately $500 million in testing and engineering. Approval by the NRC included over 250,000 review hours at a cost of approximately $70 million. In addition to paying the NRC review fees, we incurred approximately $130 million in costs responding to numerous NRC requests for additional information, analyses and audits. Despite the intensity of the review, the NRC approved the NuScale design in 42 months—the fastest approval ever completed by the agency. We received the SDA for our 50 MWe NPM and VOYGR-12 plant design in August 2020, and our SMR design is currently the only SMR with such an approval. The NRC subsequently certified the design as Appendix G to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 52. No other SMR or non-light water nuclear vendor has applied to the NRC for a nuclear power reactor SDA.
We expect to obtain additional NRC approval of plant configurations desired by customers. For example, we have seen strong customer interest in the VOYGR-6. We completed an SDA application for this configuration at the end of 2022. The SDA application is currently under an acceptance review by NRC and we expect that the acceptance review should be complete by mid-March 2023. The NRC review will focus its review of the SDA application on differences from the NRC-certified design. We expect NRC review time for the SDA reflecting the new configuration will be 24 months.

Customers that use our design incorporate an SDA into their license applications. The license application review can begin before the SDA application is approved. The NRC does not re-review the design in the SDA during the license application review; the review is limited to site specific design features (e.g., physical security systems, water intake structures), operational programs (e.g., maintenance, emergency preparedness) and environmental impacts. The ability to incorporate an SDA and provide only site specific information to file a license application is an improved licensing process developed by the NRC and industry, and has been used by all new reactor designs and license applications since the early 1990s. This process, known as Part 52, substantially reduced regulatory and financial risk for license applicants compared to the older process, known as Part 50. As the only vendor using Part 52 to date, NuScale has a competitive advantage and makes our SMR attractive to potential customers.
Nuclear Safety Regulatory Approval Internationally
Generally speaking, most countries limit license applications to the proposed owner and/or operator of nuclear power plants. Where appropriate in support of a customer or at the request of the regulator, we intend to engage early with regulators in each country of interest, consistent with our approach in the U.S.
The NRC has bilateral relationships with many other countries and participates in several international support organizations, including the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”), the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Nuclear Regulators Association. We expect NRC approval will benefit our ability to obtain regulatory approvals internationally and will give foreign regulators confidence that the NuScale design is safe. We also expect to benefit from the NRC’s regulatory assistance program, through which the NRC collaborates with other countries’ regulators to understand the basis for the NRC approval of our design.
16


NuScale is also engaging directly with the IAEA to facilitate regulatory approval abroad. The IAEA, while not a regulator, is important because many countries’ regulatory frameworks were developed from IAEA standards, which are somewhat different from the NRC framework. We plan to initiate in 2023 a Technical Safety Review of Design Safety (TSR-D5) with the IAEA. The purpose of a TSR-DS is to review the design safety of a nuclear power plant against the IAEA safety standards. The TSR-DS will evaluate the NuScale VOYGR-6 design information along with three supplemental reports against the IAEA safety requirements. The purpose of the review is to identify strengths and potential weaknesses of the safety case to expedite licensing in countries that employ IAEA safety guidelines.
In addition, we have had significant interaction with safety regulators and energy ministries in many of the countries where there is significant customer interest. For example: we have worked through material parts of the Vendor Design Review process with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission; we have completed a technology assessment conducted by the Office of Nuclear Regulation in the U.K.; we are working through a licensing gap analysis (comparing select local, IAEA and Western European Nuclear Regulators’ Association requirements against the NuScale design) with the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate in Ukraine; and we have performed analysis of NuScale plant safety, economy and maneuverability under a study funded by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Other Regulation
In addition to nuclear safety regulation, NuScale is subject to other nuclear regulatory controls such as export control, nuclear material safeguards and non-proliferation restrictions and liability insurance regimes (e.g., Price-Andersen Act, the 1960 Paris Convention, the 1963 Vienna Convention, and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Compensation). NuScale plans to sell its plants only in jurisdictions where nuclear liability is exclusively channeled to the plant operator.
Customers purchasing NuScale plants also must obtain required permits, licenses and insurance for the jurisdiction where the facility will be located. In the U.S., a NuScale plant developer must obtain an NRC construction permit and an NRC operating license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50 or a combined license issued pursuant to 10 CFR Part 52. Other U.S. federal permits or licenses for a NuScale plant may include a Section 404 Dredge & Fill Permit issued by the Army Corp. of Engineers; a Federal Aviation Administration § 77.15 Permit; a Certificate of Registration issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation; and a Spills Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plan mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. State or local regulators may also require permits or licenses for a NuScale plant, including a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Construction Activities and to Construct a Sanitary Wastewater, Wastewater Treatment facility; Section 401 Water Quality Certification; Well Permits; Solid Waste Handling Permit; and appropriate building permits.
Export Controls
NuScale’s business is subject to, and complies with, stringent U.S. import and export control laws, including the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) from the Bureau of Industry and Security which is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and regulations issued by the DOE. The regulations exist to advance the national security and foreign policy interests of the U.S. and to further its nonproliferation policies. Nuclear technology, also known as technical data, is controlled by 10 CFR Part 810, under the regulations of the DOE. Nuclear hardware and codes specifically designed or modified for use in a nuclear reactor are controlled by the NRC under 10 CFR Part 110.
The U.S. government agencies responsible for administering the EAR and other export control regulations have a degree of discretion interpreting and enforcing these regulations. These agencies also have significant discretion in approving, denying or instituting specific conditions regarding authorizations to engage in controlled activities. Such decisions are influenced by the U.S. government’s commitments to multilateral export control regimes, particularly the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a group of nuclear supplier countries that seek to prevent nuclear proliferation by controlling the export of materials, equipment and technology that can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons.
Many different types of internal controls and measures are required to ensure compliance with such export control regulations. For example, 10 CFR Part 810, Appendix A provides a list of countries that are considered Generally Authorized meaning they are considered to be non-sensitive. Countries not on this list are required to be specifically authorized prior to sharing any nuclear technology. Under Part 110, the NRC regulates the export or import of nuclear hardware, material and code, following the same sensitive countries vs. non sensitive countries regulatory structure embedded in 10 CFR Part 810.

17


Available Information

Our website address is www.nuscalepower.com. You may obtain free electronic copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports on the “Investor” portion of our website, under the heading “SEC Filings” filed under “Financials.” These reports are available on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the SEC. These reports, and any amendments to them, are also available at the Internet website of the SEC, http://www.sec.gov. We also maintain various documents related to our corporate governance including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board Committee Charters and our Code of Business Ethics Program filed under “Governance.” The information found on the website is not part of, or incorporated by reference into, this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.



18


Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have identified the following risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation. The risks described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material may also significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or reputation. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. In assessing these risks, you should also refer to the financial statements and prospectsrelated notes contained in this report.

We may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business or financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of NuScale and notes to the financial statements included in this report.

Risks Related to Our Structure and Governance

NuScale Corp is a holding company and its only material asset is its interest in NuScale LLC, and it is accordingly dependent upon distributions made by its subsidiaries to pay taxes, make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends and fees associated with being a public company such as director retainers, NYSE and other regulatory filings.

NuScale Corp is a holding company with no material assets other than its ownership of the NuScale LLC units. As a result, NuScale Corp has no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. NuScale Corp’s ability to pay taxes, cause NuScale LLC to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and pay dividends depends on the financial results and cash flows of NuScale LLC and the distributions it receives (directly or indirectly) from NuScale LLC. Deterioration in the financial condition, earnings or cash flow of NuScale LLC for any reason could limit or impair its ability to pay such distributions. Additionally, to the extent that NuScale Corp needs funds and NuScale LLC is restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of any financing arrangements, or NuScale LLC is otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect NuScale Corp’s liquidity and financial condition.

NuScale LLC is treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes and, as such, generally will not be subject to any entity-level United States federal income tax. Instead, taxable income will be allocated to holders of NuScale LLC units. Accordingly, NuScale Corp will be required to pay income taxes on its allocable share of any net taxable income from NuScale LLC. Under the terms of the Sixth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of NuScale LLC (the “A&R NuScale LLC Agreement”), NuScale LLC is obligated to make tax distributions to holders of NuScale LLC units calculated at certain assumed tax rates. In addition to income taxes, NuScale Corp is also expected to incur expenses related to its operations, including payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be significant, and some of which will be reimbursed by NuScale LLC (excluding payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement). NuScale Corp intends to cause NuScale LLC to make ordinary distributions and tax distributions to holders of NuScale LLC units on a significantpro rata basis in amounts sufficient to cover all applicable taxes, relevant operating expenses, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement and dividends, if any, declared by NuScale Corp. However, as discussed above, NuScale LLC’s ability to make such distributions may be subject to various limitations and restrictions, including, but not limited to, retention of amounts necessary to satisfy the obligations of NuScale LLC and restrictions on distributions that would violate any applicable restrictions contained in NuScale LLC’s debt agreements, if any, or any applicable law or that would have the effect of rendering NuScale LLC insolvent. To the extent that NuScale Corp is unable to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, such payments will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid; provided, however, that nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement and therefore accelerate payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which could be substantial.

Additionally, although NuScale LLC generally will not be subject to any entity-level United States federal income tax, it may be liable under recent United States federal tax legislation for adjustments to prior year tax returns, absent an election to the economic, politicalcontrary. In the event NuScale LLC’s calculations of taxable income are incorrect, NuScale LLC and social conditionsits members, including NuScale Corp, in later years may be subject to material liabilities pursuant to this legislation and government policies, developmentsits related guidance.
19


If NuScale LLC were treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax or state tax purposes, then the amount available for distribution by NuScale LLC could be substantially reduced and conditionsthe value of NuScale Corp shares could be adversely affected.

An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes (such as NuScale LLC) may nonetheless be treated as, and taxable as, a corporation if it is a “publicly traded partnership” unless an exception to such treatment applies. An entity that would otherwise be classified as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes will be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” if interests in such entity are traded on an established securities market or interests in such entity are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. If NuScale LLC is determined to be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” (and taxable as a corporation) for United States federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable on its income at the United States federal income tax rates applicable to corporations and distributions by NuScale LLC to its partners (including NuScale Corp) could be taxable as dividends to such partners to the extent of the earnings and profits of NuScale LLC. In addition, we would no longer have the benefit of increases in the country in which we operate.

Because we are incorporated undertax basis of NuScale LLC’s assets as a result of exchanges of NuScale LLC Class B units. Pursuant to the lawsA&R NuScale LLC Agreement, certain Legacy NuScale Equityholders may, from time to time, subject to the terms of the Cayman Islands, youA&R NuScale LLC Agreement, exchange their interests in NuScale LLC and have such interests redeemed by NuScale LLC for cash or shares of Class A common stock. While such exchanges could be treated as trading in the interests of NuScale LLC for purposes of testing “publicly traded partnership” status, the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement contains restrictions on redemptions and exchanges of interests in NuScale LLC that are intended to prevent NuScale LLC entities from being treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for United States federal income tax purposes. Such restrictions are designed to comply with certain safe harbors provided for under applicable United States federal income tax law. NuScale Corp may face difficultiesalso impose additional restrictions on exchanges that it determines to be necessary or advisable so that NuScale LLC is not treated as a “publicly traded partnership” for United States federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, while such position is not free from doubt, NuScale LLC is expected to be operated such that it is not treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes and we intend to take the position that NuScale LLC is so treated as a result of exchanges of its interests (i.e., LLC common units exchanged to Class B units and Class B shares) pursuant to the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement.

Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, NuScale Corp will be required to pay to certain Legacy NuScale Equityholders 85% of certain tax benefits, if any, that it realizes (or in protecting your interests,certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of any increases in tax basis and your ability to protect your rights throughrelated tax benefits resulting from any exchange of NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A common stock or cash in the U.S. federal courtsfuture, and those payments may be limited.substantial.


ProvisionsThe Legacy NuScale Equityholders may in our amendedthe future exchange their NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A common stock (or, upon the election of NuScale Corp, cash in an amount equal to the net proceeds raised by selling such shares of Class A common stock in a contemporaneous underwritten offering), subject to certain restrictions. Such transactions are expected to result in increases in NuScale Corp’s share of the tax basis of the tangible and restated memorandumintangible assets of NuScale LLC. These increases in tax basis may result in increased tax depreciation and articlesamortization deductions and therefore reduce the amount of association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors mightincome or franchise tax that NuScale Corp would otherwise be willingrequired to pay in the future had such sales and exchanges never occurred.

NuScale Corp is party to the Tax Receivable Agreement with NuScale LLC, each of the TRA Holders (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement) party thereto and Fluor, in its capacity as TRA Representative (as defined in the Tax Receivable Agreement). Pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement, NuScale Corp will be required to pay 85% of the net cash tax savings from certain tax benefits, if any, that it realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of any increases in tax basis and other tax benefits resulting from any exchange by the TRA Holders of NuScale LLC Class B units for ourshares of Class A ordinary shares and could entrench management.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
General
We are a blank check company incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company forcommon stock or cash in the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities, which we referfuture. Any such payments to as our initial business combination. To date, our effortsTRA Holders will reduce the cash provided by the tax savings generated from future exchanges that would otherwise have been limitedavailable to organizational activities relatedNuScale Corp for other uses, including reinvestment or dividends to our Initial Public OfferingClass A stockholders. Cash tax savings from the remaining 15% of the tax benefits will be retained by NuScale Corp. NuScale Corp’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement accelerate upon a change in control and certain other termination events, as defined therein. These payments are the obligation of NuScale Corp and not of NuScale LLC. The actual increase in NuScale Corp’s allocable share of NuScale LLC’s tax basis in its assets, as well as the search for a prospective business combination.
Weamount and timing of any payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, will seek to capitalize on the significant experience and vast network of our Team to complete our initial business combination. Although we may pursue our initial business combination in any business, industry or geographic location, we currently intend to focus on opportunities that capitalize on the expertise and ability of our Team, particularly our executive officers, to identify, acquire and operate a business in the broadly-defined sustainability industry. This industry includes, but is not limited to, the Sustainability industry in the United States and other developed countries. We believe our Team’s collective background and the favorable macroeconomic and social trends disrupting the Sustainability industry will provide an opportunity to execute a potentially transformational business combination.
We believe that there are significant attractive investment opportunities focused on improving the planet that are centered around a core sustainability theme. Growth in the Sustainability industry is driven by a series of macroeconomic and social trends. Macroeconomic trends contributing to growth in the Sustainability industry include urbanization, population growth, increased government spending, and increased regulatory requirements at the federal, state and local level. In addition, various social trends, such as the increased focus on ESG practices and business models as well as ESG increasingly becoming a core mandate for fund managers, are leading to an increased global focus on sustainability. As a result, we believe the Sustainability industry has the potential to undergo profound changes similar to other industries in the past, such as the transportation industry with airline deregulation in the 1970s and telecom industry following the emergence of wireless technology in the 1990s.
We believe that we are well-positioned to identify attractive businesses in the Sustainability industry that would benefit from access to the public markets and the diverse skill set of our management team. We intend to focus on evaluating established companies with leading competitive positions, experienced management teams, attractive financial profiles and robust long-term potential for growth and profitability. We believe many businesses in the Sustainability industry could benefit from access to the public markets but have been unable to do so due tovary depending upon a number of factors, including the time it takes to conduct a traditional initial public offering,timing of exchanges, the market volatility and pricing uncertainty. Our objective is to consummate our initial business combination with such a business and enhance stakeholder value by identifying and recruiting management, pursuing additional acquisitions, implementing operational improvements and expanding its product offerings and geographic footprint. We intend to utilize our Team’s experience, reputation and contacts across the industry to achieve this objective.
Recent Developments
On March 25, 2021 we entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the company, Spring Valley Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiaryprice of the company (“Merger Sub”), and Dream Holdings, Inc., a Delaware public benefit corporation (“Dream Holdings”), relating to a proposed business combination with AeroFarms. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, among other things, Dream Holdings will merge with and into Merger Sub (the “Merger,” together with the other transactions related thereto, the “Proposed Transactions”), with Dream Holdings surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiaryshares of the company.
For additional information regarding the Proposed Transactions and the Merger Agreement and related agreements, see the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on March 26, 2021.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our Team
We are supported by Pearl Energy Investments (“Pearl”), a Dallas, Texas-based investment firm with $1.2 billion of committed capital under management as of June 30, 2020. Pearl was founded by William Quinn in 2015 and focuses on partnering with best-in-class management teams to invest in the North American energy industry, typically targeting opportunities requiring $25 million to $100 million of equity capital. Over the course of their careers, the principals at Pearl have executed on billions of dollars of aggregate transaction value through direct investment, financing and acquisitions, with experience spanning venture to late stage buyout and across all parts of the business cycle.
We are further supported by our team of advisors from leading global companies with experience in a wide range of subsectors and functional areas. This support is intended to provide us with access to their expertise and extensive industry networks from which we plan to source and evaluate targets as well as devise plans to optimize any business that we acquire.
Business Strategy
Our acquisition and value creation strategy is to identify and complete our initial business combination with a Sustainability-focused company that builds upon the vast industry experience and expertise of our Team.
We expect to develop our pipeline of opportunities for a potential business combination through our management team’s 175 cumulative years of experience, deep relationships and extensive network of corporate executives, board members, venture capital and private equity firms, family offices, investment bankers, lawyers, investors and other service providers to the Sustainability industry. We have an extensive history of launching successful investment platforms through proactive and highly selective sourcing of potential targets by analyzing the entire value chain to determine the best balance of risk and reward segment. Utilizing this approach, we have helped build large public and private platforms in the global sustainability and energy markets.
Our selection process will leverage our Team’s broad and deep relationship network, unique industry experiences and extensive deal-sourcing capabilities to access a broad spectrum of differentiated opportunities. We expect to develop this network through our Team’s broad experience, with demonstrated success in both investing in and operating businesses across a variety of industries and at numerous stages of these companies’ life cycles. We have developed a distinctive combination of capabilities, which includes:

an established record of building industry-leading companies and strong ability to deliver shareholder value over an extended time period;

experience using acquisitions to grow companies during periods of both economic growth and decline by using extensive deal-sourcing and differentiated transaction execution/structuring capabilities;

experience deploying value creation strategies, including recruiting talented personnel, implementing system upgrades with the back-office systems, and delivering operating efficiency by implementing an analytical based approached to business metrics; and

extensive capital markets experience across various business cycles, including financing businesses and assisting companies with transition to public ownership.
We intend to focus our efforts on opportunities where our Team’s strategic vision, operating expertise, deep relationships, and capital markets experience can be catalysts to enhance the growth, competitive position and financial upside in an initial business combination. We intend to identify and execute an initial business combination within the Sustainability industry in the United States or other developed countries, although we may pursue targets in any business, industry, sector, or geographical location. Our Team has an established history in identifying and capitalizing on key trends that have shaped the global sustainability and energy markets and has helped build leading platforms to scale within the marketplace.
Our Competitive Strengths
Our intent is to identify and complete our initial business combination with a company that complements the experience of our Team and can benefit from our unique combination of skills in investing, financing,

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

advising and operating. Our Team has a substantial deal-making skillset developed throughout their collective careers and has created significant shareholder value across several high- profile transactions, including:

As lead investor in 2006, Mr. Sorrells brought together a combination of strategic and financial partners to lead investment in Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: REGI), one of the largest global biodiesel/renewable diesel companies. At the time, this investment was noted as one of the largest investments in biodiesel in North America and helped transform an emerging industry into a growing and vibrant sector. Renewable Energy Group, Inc.’s revenues have grown from approximately $85 million in 2008 to approximately $2.6 billion in 2019 via organic growth and an aggressive acquisition strategy. In addition, theClass A common stock price for Renewable Energy Group, Inc. has appreciated significantly since going public in January 2012.

As an investor in 2002, Mr. Quinn, made an investment in Energy Transfer in connection with the creation of a new private company to acquire a $265 million package of midstream assets from Aquila, Inc. (now Black Hills Energy). Through a combination with Heritage Propane Partners, several major acquisitions and numerous organic growth projects, as well as an initial public offering in 2006, Energy Transfer grew from a small private company into one of the largest publicly traded midstream corporations.

From 2008 to 2012, as Chief Executive Officer and director, Mr. Thompson successfully led Power-One, Inc. through restructuring, and helped the company increase its revenue from approximately $537.5 million in 2008 to approximately $1 billion in 2012 and become one of the largest renewable energy inverter suppliers worldwide. In July 2013, Mr. Thompson successfully completed the sale of Power-One, Inc. to ABB (NYSE: ABB) for over $1 billion in equity value. In 2007, as Chief Financial Officer of American Power Conversion Corporation (Nasdaq: APCC), Mr. Thompson helped negotiate the sale of the company to Schneider Electric SA (Paris: SU.PA) for approximately $6 billion in enterprise value.

As former Global Executive Director of Ecomagination at General Electric Company, Ms. Frodl repositioned the company’s sustainable technology strategy into a multi-faceted platform for innovation and global growth. During Ms. Frodl’s tenure from 2012 to 2017, GE Ecomagination’s revenues exceeded $125 billion. In 2017, the Ecomagination portfolio was comprised of 74 Ecomagination qualified products and solutions, including onshore and offshore wind, gas engines, gas turbines, hybrid gas turbine, GEnx and LEAP engines, LEDs, Hydropower, solar, solar inverters, EV charging infrastructure, Tier 4 locomotives and battery storage.

As one of the key architects of the nation’s competitive power markets, Mr. Wood has been on the forefront of the transformation of the power sector. His regulatory leadership at the Public Utility Commission of Texas and at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission during the transition to a cleaner, more flexible power system created an attractive investment climate for innovative companies and technologies across the United States. As chairman of IPP Dynegy, Mr. Wood led the board of a small company emerging from bankruptcy in 2012 through four significant mergers (including two simultaneous ones with Energy Capital Partners and Duke Energy). Dynegy’s fifth merger, in 2018 with Vistra Energy (NYSE: VST), created the nation’s largest IPP with an equity value of $10 billion at the time of closing.the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable and the amount and timing of the recognition of NuScale Corp’s income. While many of the factors that will determine the amount of payments that NuScale Corp will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement are outside of its control, NuScale Corp expects that the payments it will make under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on NuScale Corp’s
20


Among these transactions, wefinancial condition. Any payments made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have helped pioneer business models/technologiesotherwise been available to NuScale Corp. To the extent that NuScale Corp is unable to make timely payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and have deployed assetswill accrue interest until paid; however, nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a material breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement and therefore accelerate payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement. Furthermore, NuScale Corp’s future obligation to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could make it a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that have changedcannot use some or all of the way we produce or transport energy and power while contributing to the significant growth in clean energy and power. We expect to draw upon this vast set of experiences with a goal of affecting a business combination and build a market-leading business.
With respect to the above, past performance of our Team is not a guarantee of either (i) success with respect to a business combinationtax benefits that may be consummated or (ii)deemed realized under the ability to successfully identify and execute a transaction. You should not relyTax Receivable Agreement.
In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may exceed the actual tax benefits NuScale Corp realizes.

Payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the historical recordtax reporting positions that NuScale Corp determines, and the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or another taxing authority may challenge all or any part of the tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that NuScale Corp takes, and a court may sustain such a challenge. In the event that any tax benefits initially claimed by NuScale Corp are disallowed, the Legacy NuScale Equityholders will not be required to reimburse NuScale Corp for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, for example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities. Rather, excess payments made to such holders will be netted against any future cash payments otherwise required to be made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement, if any, after the determination of such excess. However, a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by NuScale Corp may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that NuScale Corp might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments against which to net. As a result, in certain circumstances NuScale Corp could make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of NuScale Corp’s actual income tax savings, which could materially impair NuScale Corp’s financial condition.

Moreover, the Tax Receivable Agreement provides that, in certain events, including a change of control, breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement, or NuScale Corp exercise of early termination rights, NuScale Corp obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will accelerate and NuScale Corp will be required to make a lump-sum cash payment to the Legacy NuScale Equityholders party to the Tax Receivable Agreement equal to the present value of all forecasted future payments that would have otherwise been made under the Tax Receivable Agreement, which lump-sum payment would be based on certain assumptions, including those relating to NuScale Corp future taxable income. The lump-sum payment could be substantial and could exceed the actual tax benefits that NuScale Corp realizes subsequent to such payment because such payment would be calculated assuming, among other things, that NuScale Corp would have certain tax benefits available to it and that NuScale Corp would be able to use the potential tax benefits in future years.

There may be a material negative effect on NuScale Corp’s liquidity if the payments required to be made by NuScale Corp under the Tax Receivable Agreement exceed the actual income or franchise tax savings that NuScale Corp realizes. Furthermore, NuScale Corp’s obligations to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control.

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE rules and, as a result, qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements, and our stockholders do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Fluor owns a majority of the voting power of our Teamcommon stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” under the NYSE rules. As a controlled company, we are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements, including those that would otherwise require our board of directors to have a majority of independent directors and require that we either establish compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, each comprised entirely of independent directors, or their respective affiliates as indicative of future performance. See “Risk Factors — Past performance by our Team, including investments and transactions in which they have participated and businesses with which they have been associated, may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us, and we may be unable to

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

provide positive returns to shareholders.” For a listotherwise ensure that the compensation of our executive officers and entities for which a conflictnominees of interest maydirectors are determined or does exist between such officers and the company, please refer to “Management — Conflicts of Interest.”
Industry Opportunity
We believe our Team’s extensive and diversified experience in Sustainability will help us to effectively evaluate targets across the Sustainability industry. We believe Sustainability is attractive for a number of reasons:
Large Target Market.   According to estimates from the International Renewable Energy Agency, between 2016 and 2050, global cumulative investments in renewables could total approximately $13 trillion, while cumulative investments in energy efficiency could total approximately $29 trillion. We believe this growth is driven by continued innovation that has reduced capital costs versus incumbent processes as well as a global acceleration in electrification. For instance, in the clean energy industry, the cost of large-scale and residential photovoltaic solar power has decreased 82% and between 47% to 80% (depending on the region), respectively, since 2010, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency. This cost reduction in large-scale photovoltaic installations makes it less expensive to build and operate a solar installation than a coal fired power plant in many parts of the world. In addition, according to industry sources, the trend towards electrification in mobility has pushed passenger electric vehicle sales from 450,000 cars in 2015 to 2.1 million in 2019 and is expected to account for 54 million cars, or approximately 58%, of new car sales by 2040.
Favorable Trends.   The Sustainability industry is defined by significant growth in a set of dynamic and changing industries. We believe the significant growth in Sustainability is driven by a series of macroeconomic and social trends. Macroeconomic trends contributing to growth in the Sustainability industry include urbanization, population growth, increased government spending and increased regulatory requirements at the federal, state and local level. In addition, various social trends, such as the increased focus on ESG practices and business models as well as ESG increasingly becoming a core mandate for fund managers, are leading to an increased global focus on Sustainability, climate change and a reduced carbon footprint. We believe an ESG focus is becoming engrained in the fabric of socially conscious corporations, and that ESG standards are becoming an increasingly common benchmarking criteria for prospective employees.
Broad Universe of Targets.   We intend to focus our investment effort across the broad Sustainability industry. We believe the anticipated growth in the industry and the related sectors will present a substantial number of actionable opportunities with the required scale that fit our acquisition criteria. According to industry source Pitchbook, there were over 14,600 companies operating in the Sustainability industry as of August 2020.
High Barriers to Entry.   Success in Sustainability is driven by a myriad of global regulations, government spending and technological breakthroughs. We believe our Team’s experience in the Sustainability industry over the past 25 years provides a significant amount of proprietary domain expertise and know-how in evaluating investment opportunities in a difficult-to-navigate industry. Further, our Team has spent considerable time navigating the complex regulatory environment inherent in the Sustainability industry, and its familiarity with the nuances of the regulatory aspect of the industry provides a differentiated competitive advantage.
Investment Approach
Our Team has commenced an extensive outreach program to its network and industry relationships to articulate the parameters for our search for a target company and a potential business combination and begin the process of pursuing and reviewing potential opportunities. We intend to capitalize on the following competitive advantages in our pursuit of a target company:
Proactive and Proprietary Transaction Sourcing.   We believe that our management team’s 175 cumulative years of deal experience, history of building leading platforms, proactive approach to sourcing transactions, and extensive network of relationships will provide the potential to access numerous investment opportunities. We believe our Team’s deep industry expertise across Sustainability industries and throughout

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the capital structure makes a business combination with us an attractive option for Sustainability companies seeking capital solutions.
Data Driven Analysis of Potential Opportunities.   We believe that our Team has an established record of generating investment opportunities. Within targeted subsectors, we expect to employ an initial review of the entire value chain to determine the best risk / reward profiles of the subsector. In addition, we expect to analyze current trends, develop investment theses and create strategies for originating and evaluating investment opportunities. This research-oriented, data-intensive process would allow us to proactively identify trends, find opportunities and execute transactions ahead of potential competitors.
Execution and Structuring Capability.   We believe that our Team’s transaction experience and reputation allow it to source and complete transactions requiring complex problem-solving skills and insight. Our Team has helped create several multi-billion dollar public and private companies that required these skills and deep industry insights. These types of transactions are typically complex and require creativity, industry knowledge and expertise, rigorous due diligence and extensive negotiation and documentation. Our Team has experience investing in many Sustainability-focused industries and has developed operational expertise at companies at varying stages of their life cycles. We plan to utilize this experience to help us generate investment opportunities with attractive risk/reward profiles based on their valuations, structural characteristics and relatively low levels of financial leverage.
Significant Value-Add Capability.   We believe the industry expertise and broad network of relationships of our Team will allow it to add significant value and therefore be a key selling point to attract high caliber acquisition targets. We plan to market our Team to potential target companies in a number of capacities, including: (i) assisting in setting strategic direction and priorities; (ii) designing specific performance-improvement projects; (iii) helping to identify and recruit managers; (iv) advising on acquisition and financing transactions; (v) contributing market information; (vi) positioning the company products and services with customers and various stakeholders; and (vii) developing a targeted investor relations program. Furthermore, our Team is also experienced in navigating complex regulatory issues that impact many companies that are part of certain subsectors within the Sustainability industry. Our Team believes that its ability to identify and implement value creation initiatives has been an essential driver of past performance and will remain centralrecommended to our acquisition strategy.
Broad and Extensive Experience in Both Public and Private Markets.   Our Team has decadesboard of combined operating, investing and financing experience across both public and private markets. We have created some of the leading Sustainability companies both in the public and private sector with significant revenue growth in target industries. We believe that this versatility of experience and complementary skills will help us to identify companies that could make successful public market candidates and prepare them to make the transition to robust publicly traded companies.
Business Combination Criteria
Consistent with our strategy, we have identified the following general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses and, in evaluating a prospective target business, we expect to conduct a thorough due diligence review that will encompass, among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews and inspection of facilities, as applicable, as well as a review of financial and other information that will be made available to us.

Sustainability Focus.   We intend to focus on sustainable businesses positioned to benefit from macroeconomic and social trends impacting the economy.

Established Businesses and Recognized Market Leaders.   We expect to target businesses that are market leaders in their respective subsectors within the Sustainability industry, and may be better positioned to endure economic downturns, changes in the industry landscape and evolving customer, supplier and competitor preferences.

Benefit from Being a Public Company.   We intend to acquire one or more businesses that will benefit from being publicly traded and can effectively utilize the broader access to capital and the public profile that are associated with being a publicly traded company.

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Experienced Management Team.   We will seek to partner with an experienced target team that can benefit from the unique investment, advisory, operational experience, and contacts of our Team in the Sustainability industry.

Attractive Financial Profile.   We will seek to acquire a business that has strong recurring revenues, a margin profile with high steady-state margins or high incremental margins, and / or compelling long-term growth prospects.

Leader in Technology Driven Transformation.   We will seek to acquire a business or entity with a technological advantage that provides a high barrier to entry for new entrants, a defensible position in intellectual property and presents a low or manageable risk of technological obsolescence.

Middle Market Businesses.   We believe targeting businesses or entities in the middle market will provide the greatest number of opportunities for investment and will maximize the network, contacts and experience of our Team. It may also provide the optimal platform for further consolidation.

Strong Free Cash Flow Generation or Near-Term Potential.   We will seek to acquire a business or entity that already generates, or has the potential to generate, consistent and stable free cash flow.
We plan to utilize our Team’s extensive network of contacts, which provides access to differentiated deal flow and significant deal-sourcing capabilities, and use these criteria and guidelines to evaluate acquisition opportunities. However, we may decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target business that does not meet these criteria and guidelines.
These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular initial business combination may be based, to the extent relevant, on these general guidelines as well as other considerations, factors and criteria that from time to time our management may deem relevant. In the event that we decide to enter into our initial business combination with a target business that does not meet the above criteria, we will disclose that the target business does not meet the above criteria in our shareholder communications related to our initial business combination, which, as discussed in this Report, would be in the form of proxy solicitation or tender offer materials that we would file with the SEC.
Our Acquisition Process
In evaluating a prospective target business, we expect to conduct an extensive due diligence review which may encompass, as applicable and among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of facilities and a review of financial and other information about the target and its industry. We will also utilize our management team’s operational and capital planning experience.
Each of our directors and officers, directly or indirectly, own founder shares and/or private placement warrants and, accordingly, may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to effectuate our initial business combination. Further, such officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors was included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination.
Certain of our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity subject to his or her fiduciary duties. As a result, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, then, subject to such officer’s and director’s fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law, he or she will need to honor such fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity, before we can pursue such opportunity. If these other entities decide to pursue any such opportunity, we may be precluded from pursuing the same. However, we do not expect these duties to materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that we renounce our interest in any business combination opportunity offered to any

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the company and it is an opportunity that we are able to complete on a reasonable basis.
Initial Business Combination
We will initially have up to 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering to consummate an initial business combination. However, if we anticipate that we may not be able to consummate our initial business combination within 18 months, we may, by resolutionindependent members of our board of directors if requested by our sponsor, extend the initial period of time to consummate an initial business combination one time, by an additional 6 months, subject to the sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees purchasing additional private placement warrants as set out below. Our shareholders will not be entitled to vote or redeem their public shares in connection with any such extension. Our sponsor has the right to extend the term we have to consummate our initial business combination up to 24 months, without providing our stockholders with redemption rights. Pursuant to the terms of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, in order to extend the initial period of time to consummate an initial business combination for such six-month period, our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees, upon no less than five days’ advance notice to us prior to expiration of the initial 18-month deadline, must purchase an additional 2,300,000 private placement warrants at $1.00 per warrant and deposit the $2,300,000 in proceeds into the trust account on or prior to the date of the expiration of the initial 18-month deadline. In the event that we receive such notice from our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees five days prior to the initial 18-month deadline of a request for us to effect an extension, we intend to issue a press release announcing such extension at least three days prior to the initial 18-month deadline. In addition, we intend to issue a press release the day after the initial 18-month deadline announcing whether or not the funds had been timely deposited. Our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees are not obligated to purchase additional private placement warrants to extend the time for us to complete our initial business combination.
If we have not consummated an initial business combination within such applicable time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.
So long as our securities are then listed on the Nasdaq, our initial business combination must occur with one or more target businesses that together have an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the value of the assets held in the trust account (excluding any deferred underwriting commissions and taxes payable on the income earned on the trust account) at the time of the agreement to enter into our initial business combination. We refer to this as the 80% of net assets test. If our board of directors is not able to independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses, we will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. While we consider it unlikely that our board will not be able to make an independent determination of the fair market value of a target business or businesses, it may be unable to do so if the board is less familiar or experienced with the target company’s business, there is a significant amount of uncertainty as to the value of the company’s assets or prospects, including if such company is at an early stage of development, operations or growth, or if the anticipated transaction involves a complex financial analysis or other specialized skills and the board determines that outside expertise would be helpful or necessary in conducting such analysis. Since any opinion, if obtained, would merely state that the fair market value of the target business meets the 80% of net assets threshold, unless such opinion includes material information regarding the valuation of a target business or the consideration to be provided, it is not anticipated that copies of such opinion would be distributed to our shareholders. However, if required under applicable law, any proxy statement that we deliver to shareholders and file with

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the SEC in connection with a proposed transaction will include such opinion. If our securities are not then listed on the Nasdaq for whatever reason, we would no longer be required to meet the foregoing 80% of net assets test.
We anticipate structuring our initial business combination so that the post-business combination company in which our public shareholders own shares will own or acquire 100% of the equity interests or assets of the target business or businesses. We may, however, structure our initial business combination such that the post-business combination company owns or acquires less than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business in order to meet certain objectives of the target management team or shareholders or for other reasons, but we will only complete such business combination if the post- business combination company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Even if the post-business combination company owns or acquires 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our shareholders prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-business combination company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial number of new shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% controlling interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new shares, our shareholders immediately prior to our initial business combination could own less than a majority of our outstanding shares subsequent to our initial business combination. If less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a target business or businesses are owned or acquired by the post-business combination company, the portion of such business or businesses that is owned or acquired is what will be valued for purposes of the 80% of net assets test. If the business combination involves more than one target business, the 80% of net assets test will be based on the aggregate value of all of the target businesses. In addition, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement regarding an initial business combination without the prior consent of our sponsor.
directors. To the extent we effect our initial business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in such company or business. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risk factors.
The time required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination, and the costs associated with this process, are not currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of a prospective target business with which our initial business combination is not ultimately completed will result in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination.
Other Considerations
We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor or any of our officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that such initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context.
We currently do not have any specific business combination under consideration. Our officers and directors have neither individually selected nor considered a target business nor have they had any substantive discussions regarding possible target businesses among themselves or with our underwriters or other advisors. Our management team is regularly made aware of potential business opportunities,rely on one or more of which we may desirethese exemptions, our stockholders will not have the same protections afforded to pursue for a business combination, but we have not (nor has anyone on our behalf) contacted any prospective target business or had any substantive discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to a business combination transaction with our company. Additionally, we have not, nor has anyone on our behalf, taken any substantive measure, directly or indirectly, to identify or locate any suitable

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

acquisition candidate for us, nor have we engaged or retained any agent or other representative to identify or locate any such acquisition candidate.
In addition, certainstockholders of our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary and contractual duties to other entities. As a result, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, then,companies that are subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law, he or she will need to honor such fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity, before we can pursue such opportunity. If these other entities decide to pursue any such opportunity, we may be precluded from pursuing the same. However, we do not expect these duties to materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that we renounce our interest in any business combination opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officerall of the company and it is an opportunity that we are able to complete on a reasonable basis.NYSE corporate governance requirements.
Our sponsor, officers and directors may sponsor, form or participate in other blank check companies similar to ours during the period in which we are seeking an initial business combination. Any such companies may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an acquisition target, particularly in the event there is overlap among investment mandates. However, we do not currently expect that any such other blank check company would materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination. In addition, our sponsor, officers and directors, are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs, and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating management time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence.
Status as a Public Company
We believe our structure makes us an attractive business combination partner to target businesses. As an existing public company, we offer a target business an alternative to the traditional initial public offering through a merger or other business combination with us. In a business combination transaction with us, the owners of the target business may, for example, exchange their shares of stock in the target business for our Class A ordinary shares (or shares of a new holding company) or for a combination of our Class A ordinary shares and cash, allowing us to tailor the consideration to the specific needs of the sellers. We believe target businesses will find this method a more expeditious and cost effective method to becoming a public company than the typical initial public offering. The typical initial public offering process takes a significantly longer period of time than the typical business combination transaction process, and there are significant expenses in the initial public offering process, including underwriting discounts and commissions, that may not be present to the same extent in connection with a business combination with us.
Furthermore, once a proposed business combination is completed, the target business will have effectively become public, whereas an initial public offering is always subject to the underwriters’ ability to complete the offering, as well as general market conditions, which could delay or prevent the offering from occurring or have negative valuation consequences. Once public, we believe the target business would then have greater access to capital, an additional means of providing management incentives consistent with shareholders’ interests and the ability to use its shares as currency for acquisitions. Being a public company can offer further benefits by augmenting a company’s profile among potential new customers and vendors and aid in attracting talented employees.
While we believe that our structure and our management team’s backgrounds will make us an attractive business partner, some potential target businesses may view our status as a blank check company, such as our lack of an operating history and our ability to seek shareholder approval of any proposed initial business combination, negatively.
We are an emerging growth company (“EGC”) within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a)companies”, this could make our
21


securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.

We are an EGC within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such,Act, and we are eligible tomay take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the prices of our securities may be more volatile.
In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.
We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our Initial Public Offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuant to SEC rules from time to time), or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our Class A ordinary shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates does not equal or exceed $250.0 million as of the prior June 30th, and (2) our annual revenues did not equaled or exceed $100.0 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates equals or exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of any reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison or our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Financial Position
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $232,300,000 held in the trust account, and as of December 31, 2020, no deferred underwriting fees had been paid. With these funds available for a business combination, we offer a target business a variety of options such as creating a liquidity event for its owners, providing capital for the potential growth and expansion of its operations or strengthening its balance sheet by reducing its debt ratio. Because we are able to complete our initial business combination using our cash, debt or equity securities, or a combination of the foregoing, we have the flexibility to use the most efficient combination that will allow us to tailor the consideration to be paid to the target business to fit its needs and desires. However, we have not taken any steps to secure third-party financing and there can be no assurance it will be available to us.
Effectuating Our Initial Business Combination
General
We are not presently engaged in, and we will not engage in, any operations for an indefinite period of time following our Initial Public Offering. We intend to effectuate our initial business combination using cash from the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants, the proceeds of the sale of our shares in connection with our initial business combination (pursuant to forward purchase agreements or backstop agreements we may enter into following the consummation of our Initial Public Offering or otherwise), shares issued to the owners of the target, debt issued to bank or other lenders or the owners of the target, or a combination of the foregoing or other sources. We may seek to complete our initial business combination with a company or business that may be financially unstable or in its early stages of development or growth, which would subject us to the numerous risks inherent in such companies and businesses.
If our initial business combination is paid for using equity or debt, or not all of the funds released from the trust account are used for payment of the consideration in connection with our initial business combination

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

or used for redemptions of our Class A ordinary shares, we may apply the balance of the cash released to us from the trust account for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations of the post-business combination company, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our initial business combination, to fund the purchase of other companies or for working capital.
We may need to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination, either because the transaction requires more cash than is available from the proceeds held in our trust account, or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of our public shares upon completion of the business combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such business combination. There are no prohibitions on our ability to issue securities or incur debt in connection with our initial business combination. Other than the potential availability of the backstop arrangement with our sponsor, we are not currently a party to any arrangement or understanding with any third party with respect to raising any additional funds through the sale of securities, the incurrence of debt or otherwise.
Although our management will assess the risks inherent in a particular target business with which we may combine, we cannot assure you that this assessment will result in our identifying all risks that a target business may encounter. Furthermore, some of those risks may be outside of our control, meaning that we can do nothing to control or reduce the changes that those risks will adversely affect a target business.
Sources of Target Businesses
We anticipate that target business candidates will be brought to our attention from various unaffiliated sources, including investment market participants, private equity groups, investment banking firms, consultants, accounting firms and large business enterprises. Target businesses may be brought to our attention by such unaffiliated sources as a result of being solicited by us through calls or mailings. These sources may also introduce us to target businesses in which they think we may be interested on an unsolicited basis, since some of these sources will have read this Report and know what types of businesses we are targeting. Our officers and directors, as well as their affiliates, may also bring to our attention target business candidates that they become aware of through their business contacts as a result of formal or informal inquiries or discussions they may have, as well as attending trade shows or conventions. In addition, we expect to receive a number of proprietary deal flow opportunities that would not otherwise necessarily be available to us as a result of the business relationships of our officers and directors. While we do not presently anticipate engaging the services of professional firms or other individuals that specialize in business acquisitions on any formal basis, we may engage these firms or other individuals in the future, in which event we may pay a finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation to be determined in an arm’s length negotiation based on the terms of the transaction. We will engage a finder only to the extent our management determines that the use of a finder may bring opportunities to us that may not otherwise be available to us or if finders approach us on an unsolicited basis with a potential transaction that our management determines is in our best interest to pursue. Payment of finder’s fees is customarily tied to completion of a transaction, in which case any such fee will be paid out of the funds held in the trust account. In no event, however, will our sponsor or any of our existing officers or directors, or their respective affiliates paid by us any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the completion of our initial business combination (regardless of the type of transaction that it is). We have agreed to pay an affiliate of our sponsor a total of $10,000 per month for office space, secretarial and administrative support and to reimburse our sponsor for any out-of-pocket expenses related to identifying, investigating and completing an initial business combination. Some of our officers and directors may enter into employment or consulting agreements with the post-business combination company following our initial business combination. The presence or absence of any such fees or arrangements will not be used as a criterion in our selection process of an acquisition candidate.
We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor or any of our officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that such initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context.
Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future may have, additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities, including entities that are affiliates of our sponsor, pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity. Accordingly, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity.
Evaluation of a Target Business and Structuring of Our Initial Business Combination
In evaluating a prospective target business, we expect to conduct an extensive due diligence review which may encompass, as applicable and among other things, meetings with incumbent management and employees, document reviews, interviews of customers and suppliers, inspection of facilities and a review of financial and other information about the target and its industry. We will also utilize our management team’s operational and capital planning experience. If we determine to move forward with a particular target, we will proceed to structure and negotiate the terms of the business combination transaction.
The time required to select and evaluate a target business and to structure and complete our initial business combination, and the costs associated with this process, are not currently ascertainable with any degree of certainty. Any costs incurred with respect to the identification and evaluation of, and negotiation with, a prospective target business with which our initial business combination is not ultimately completed will result in our incurring losses and will reduce the funds we can use to complete another business combination. The company will not pay any consulting fees to members of our management team, or their respective affiliates, for services rendered to or in connection with our initial business combination. In addition, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement regarding an initial business combination without the prior consent of our sponsor.
Lack of Business Diversification
For an indefinite period of time after the completion of our initial business combination, the prospects for our success may depend entirely on the future performance of a single business. Unlike other entities that have the resources to complete business combinations with multiple entities in one or several industries, it is probable that we will not have the resources to diversify our operations and mitigate the risks of being in a single line of business. By completing our initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may:

subject us to negative economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact on the particular industry in which we operate after our initial business combination; and

cause us to depend on the marketing and sale of a single product or limited number of products or services.
Limited Ability to Evaluate the Target’s Management Team
Although we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective target business when evaluating the desirability of effecting our initial business combination with that business, our assessment of the target business’s management may not prove to be correct. In addition, the future management may not have the necessary skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company. Furthermore, the future role of members of our management team, if any, in the target business cannot presently be stated with any certainty. The determination as to whether any of the members of our management team will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination. While it is possible that one or more of our directors will remain associated in some capacity with us following our initial business combination, it is unlikely that any of them will devote their full efforts to our affairs subsequent

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to our initial business combination. Moreover, we cannot assure you that members of our management team will have significant experience or knowledge relating to the operations of the particular target business.
We cannot assure you that any of our key personnel will remain in senior management or advisory positions with the combined company. The determination as to whether any of our key personnel will remain with the combined company will be made at the time of our initial business combination.
Following a business combination, we may seek to recruit additional managers to supplement the incumbent management of the target business. We cannot assure you that we will have the ability to recruit additional managers, or that additional managers will have the requisite skills, knowledge or experience necessary to enhance the incumbent management.
Shareholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve Our Initial Business Combination
We may conduct redemptions without a shareholder vote pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC subject to the provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. However, we will seek shareholder approval if it is required by applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement, or we may decide to seek shareholder approval for business or other reasons.
Under the Nasdaq’s listing rules, shareholder approval would typically be required for our initial business combination if, for example:

We issue ordinary shares that will be equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of our ordinary shares then-outstanding (other than in a public offering for cash);

Any of our directors, officers or substantial security holder (as defined by the Nasdaq rules) has a 5% or greater interest (or such persons collectively have a 10% or greater interest), directly or indirectly, in the target business or assets to be acquired or in the consideration to be paid in the transaction and the present or potential issuance of ordinary shares, or securities convertible into or exercisable for ordinary shares, could result in an increase in issued and outstanding ordinary shares or voting power of 5% or more; or

The issuance or potential issuance of ordinary shares will result in our undergoing a change of control.
The decision as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed business combination in those instances in which shareholder approval is not required by law will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on business and reasons, which include a variety of factors, including, but not limited to:

the timing of the transaction, including in the event we determine shareholder approval would require additional time and there is either not enough time to seek shareholder approval or doing so would place the company at a disadvantage in the transaction or result in other additional burdens on the company;

the expected cost of holding a shareholder vote;

the risk that the shareholders would fail to approve the proposed business combination;

other time and budget constraints of the company; and

additional legal complexities of a proposed business combination that would be time-consuming and burdensome to present to shareholders.
Permitted Purchases and Other Transactions with Respect to Our Securities
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase public shares or warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business combination. Additionally, at any time at or prior to our initial business combination, subject to applicable securities laws (including with respect to material nonpublic information), our sponsor, directors, executive

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

officers, advisors or their affiliates may enter into transactions with investors and others to provide them with incentives to acquire public shares, vote their public shares in favor of our initial business combination or not redeem their public shares. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase public shares or warrants in such transactions. If they engage in such transactions, they will be restricted from making any such purchases when they are in possession of any material non-public information not disclosed to the seller or if such purchases are prohibited by Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
In the event that our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights or submitted a proxy to vote against our initial business combination, such selling shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares and any proxy to vote against our initial business combination. We do not currently anticipate that such purchases, if any, would constitute a tender offer subject to the tender offer rules under the Exchange Act or a going-private transaction subject to the going-private rules under the Exchange Act; however, if the purchasers determine at the time of any such purchases that the purchases are subject to such rules, the purchasers will be required to comply with such rules.
The purpose of any such transaction could be to (i) vote in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the business combination, (ii) reduce the number of public warrants outstanding or vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial business combination or (iii) satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our initial business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our initial business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.
In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or public warrants may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange.
Our sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates may identify the shareholders with whom our sponsor, officers, directors or their affiliates may pursue privately negotiated transactions by either the shareholders contacting us directly or by our receipt of redemption requests submitted by shareholders (in the case of Class A ordinary shares) following our mailing of tender offer or proxy materials in connection with our initial business combination. To the extent that our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates enter into a private transaction, they would identify and contact only potential selling or redeeming shareholders who have expressed their election to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account or vote against our initial business combination, whether or not such shareholder has already submitted a proxy with respect to our initial business combination but only if such shares have not already been voted at the general meeting related to our initial business combination. Our sponsor, executive officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates will select which shareholders to purchase shares from based on the negotiated price and number of shares and any other factors that they may deem relevant, and will be restricted from purchasing shares if such purchases do not comply with Regulation M under the Exchange Act and the other federal securities laws.
Our sponsor, officers, directors and/or their affiliates will be restricted from making purchases of shares if the purchases would violate Section 9(a)(2) or Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act. We expect any such purchases would be reported by such person pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements.
Redemption Rights for Public Shareholders upon Completion of Our Initial Business Combination
We will provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Class A ordinary shares upon the completion of our initial business combination at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account calculated as of two business days prior

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to the consummation of the initial business combination, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any, divided by the number of then-outstanding public shares, subject to the limitations described herein. The amount in the trust account is initially anticipated to be $10.10 per public share and such amount will be increased by $0.10 for the six-month extension of our time to consummate a business combination, as described herein. The per-share amount we will distribute to investors who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commission we will pay to the underwriters. The redemption rights will include the requirement that a beneficial holder must identify itself in order to validly redeem its shares. There will be no redemption rights upon the completion of our initial business combination with respect to our warrants. Further, subject to the provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (as further described under Business — Effectuating Our Initial Business Combination — Redemption of Public Shares and Liquidation If No Initial Business Combination”), we will not proceed with redeeming our public shares, even if a public shareholder has properly elected to redeem its shares, if a business combination does not close. Our sponsor and each member of our management team have entered into an agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares and public shares held by them in connection with (i) the completion of our initial business combination and (ii) a shareholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares.
Limitations on Redemptions
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). However, the proposed business combination may require: (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash to be transferred to the target for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions in accordance with the terms of the proposed business combination. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all Class A ordinary shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, and all Class A ordinary shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof.
Manner of Conducting Redemptions
We will provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their Class A ordinary shares upon the completion of our initial business combination either (i) in connection with a general meeting called to approve the business combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed business combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would require us to seek shareholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement or whether we were deemed to be a foreign private issuer (which would require a tender offer rather than seeking shareholder approval under SEC rules). Asset acquisitions and share purchases would not typically require shareholder approval while direct mergers with our company where we do not survive and any transactions where we issue more than 20% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares or seek to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association would typically require shareholder approval. We currently intend to conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote unless shareholder approval is not required by applicable law or stock exchange listing requirement or we choose to conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC for business or other reasons. So long as we obtain and maintain a listing for our securities on the Nasdaq, we will be required to comply with the Nasdaq rules.

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we held a shareholder vote to approve our initial business combination, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association:

conduct the redemptions in conjunction with a proxy solicitation pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies, and not pursuant to the tender offer rules; and

file proxy materials with the SEC.
In the event that we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, we will distribute proxy materials and, in connection therewith, provide our public shareholders with the redemption rights described above upon completion of the initial business combination.
If we seek shareholder approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if we obtain the approval of an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company. In such case, our sponsor and each member of our management team have agreed to vote their founder shares and public shares in favor of our initial business combination. As a result, in addition to our initial purchaser’s founder shares, we would need 8,625,001, or 37.5%, of the 23,000,000 public shares sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of an initial business combination in order to have our initial business combination approved. In the event that each of our anchor investors continues to hold the 1,980,000 units purchased in our Initial Public Offering and votes in favor of an initial business combination, we would not need any additional public shares sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of our initial business combination to have our initial business combination approved. We intend to give approximately 30 days (but not less than 10 days nor more than 60 days) prior written notice of any such meeting, if required, at which a vote shall be taken to approve our initial business combination. These quorum and voting thresholds, and the voting agreements of our initial stockholders, may make it more likely that we will consummate our initial business combination. Each public shareholder may elect to redeem their public shares irrespective of whether they vote for or against the proposed transaction or vote at all. In addition, our sponsor and each member of our management team have entered into an agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares and public shares held by them in connection with (i) the completion of a business combination and (ii) a shareholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares.
If we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the SEC, we will, pursuant to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association:

conduct the redemptions pursuant to Rule 13e-4 and Regulation 14E of the Exchange Act, which regulate issuer tender offers; and

file tender offer documents with the SEC prior to completing our initial business combination which contain substantially the same financial and other information about the initial business combination and the redemption rights as is required under Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, which regulates the solicitation of proxies.
Upon the public announcement of our initial business combination, if we elect to conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, we and our sponsor will terminate any plan established in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 to purchase Class A ordinary shares in the open market, in order to comply with Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act.
In the event we conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, our offer to redeem will remain open for at least 20 business days, in accordance with Rule 14e-1(a) under the Exchange Act, and we will not be permitted to complete our initial business combination until the expiration of the tender offer period. In addition, the tender offer will be conditioned on public shareholders not tendering more than the

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

number of public shares we are permitted to redeem. If public shareholders tender more shares than we have offered to purchase, we will withdraw the tender offer and not complete such initial business combination.
Limitation on Redemption upon Completion of Our Initial Business Combination If We Seek Shareholder Approval
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that a public shareholder, together with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in our Initial Public Offering, which we refer to as “Excess Shares,” without our prior consent. We believe this restriction will discourage shareholders from accumulating large blocks of shares, and subsequent attempts by such holders to use their ability to exercise their redemption rights against a proposed business combination as a means to force us or our management to purchase their shares at a significant premium to the then- current market price or on other undesirable terms. Absent this provision, a public shareholder holding more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in our Initial Public Offering could threaten to exercise its redemption rights if such holder’s shares are not purchased by us, our sponsor or our management at a premium to the then-current market price or on other undesirable terms. By limiting our shareholders’ ability to redeem no more than 15% of the shares sold in our Initial Public Offering without our prior consent, we believe we will limit the ability of a small group of shareholders to unreasonably attempt to block our ability to complete our initial business combination, particularly in connection with a business combination with a target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash.
However, we would not be restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against our initial business combination.
Tendering Share Certificates in Connection with a Tender Offer or Redemption Rights
Public shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in “street name,” will be required to either tender their certificates (if any) to our transfer agent prior to the date set forth in the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, mailed to such holders, or to deliver their shares to the transfer agent electronically using The Depository Trust Company’s DWAC (Deposit/ Withdrawal At Custodian) System, at the holder’s option, in each case up to two business days prior to the initially scheduled vote to approve the business combination. The proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will indicate the applicable delivery requirements, which will include the requirement that a beneficial holder must identify itself in order to validly redeem its shares. Accordingly, a public shareholder would have from the time we send out our tender offer materials until the close of the tender offer period, or up to two business days prior to the initially scheduled vote on the proposal to approve the business combination if we distribute proxy materials, as applicable, to tender its shares if it wishes to seek to exercise its redemption rights. Given the relatively short period in which to exercise redemption rights, it is advisable for shareholders to use electronic delivery of their public shares.
There is a nominal cost associated with the above-referenced tendering process and the act of certificating the shares or delivering them through the DWAC System. The transfer agent will typically charge the tendering broker a fee of approximately $80.00 and it would be up to the broker whether or not to pass this cost on to the redeeming holder. However, this fee would be incurred regardless of whether or not we require holders seeking to exercise redemption rights to tender their shares. The need to deliver shares is a requirement of exercising redemption rights regardless of the timing of when such delivery must be effectuated.
The foregoing is different from the procedures used by many blank check companies. In order to perfect redemption rights in connection with their business combinations, many blank check companies would distribute proxy materials for the shareholders’ vote on an initial business combination, and a holder could simply vote against a proposed business combination and check a box on the proxy card indicating such holder was seeking to exercise his or her redemption rights. After the business combination was approved, the company would contact such shareholder to arrange for him or her to deliver his or her certificate to

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

verify ownership. As a result, the shareholder then had an “option window” after the completion of the business combination during which he or she could monitor the price of the company’s shares in the market. If the price rose above the redemption price, he or she could sell his or her shares in the open market before actually delivering his or her shares to the company for cancellation. As a result, the redemption rights, to which shareholders were aware they needed to commit before the general meeting, would become “option” rights surviving past the completion of the business combination until the redeeming holder delivered its certificate. The requirement for physical or electronic delivery prior to the meeting ensures that a redeeming shareholder’s election to redeem is irrevocable once the business combination is approved.
Any request to redeem such shares, once made, may be withdrawn at any time up to two business days prior to the initially scheduled vote on the proposal to approve the business combination, unless otherwise agreed to by us. Furthermore, if a holder of a public share delivered its certificate in connection with an election of redemption rights and subsequently decides prior to the applicable date not to elect to exercise such rights, such holder may simply request that the transfer agent return the certificate (physically or electronically). It is anticipated that the funds to be distributed to holders of our public shares electing to redeem their shares will be distributed promptly after the completion of our initial business combination.
If our initial business combination is not approved or completed for any reason, then our public shareholders who elected to exercise their redemption rights would not be entitled to redeem their shares for the applicable pro rata share of the trust account. In such case, we will promptly return any certificates delivered by public holders who elected to redeem their shares.
If our initial proposed business combination is not completed, we may continue to try to complete a business combination with a different target until 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period.
Redemption of Public Shares and Liquidation If No Initial Business Combination
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that we have only 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, until the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period to consummate an initial business combination. If we have not consummated an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per- share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses) divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii) to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to our warrants, which will expire worthless if we fail to consummate an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering and our sponsor does not exercise its option to extend the time period. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that, if we wind up for any other reason prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, we will follow the foregoing procedures with respect to the liquidation of the trust account as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, subject to applicable Cayman Islands law.
Our sponsor and each member of our management team have entered into an agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their rights to liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to any founder shares they hold if we fail to consummate an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, (although they will be entitled to liquidating

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

distributions from the trust account with respect to any public shares they hold if we fail to complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame).
Our sponsor, executive officers, and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, unless we provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any, divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares. However, we may not redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). If this optional redemption right is exercised with respect to an excessive number of public shares such that we cannot satisfy the net tangible asset requirement, we would not proceed with the amendment or the related redemption of our public shares at such time. This redemption right shall apply in the event of the approval of any such amendment, whether proposed by our sponsor, any executive officer, directors, or any other person.
We expect that all costs and expenses associated with implementing our plan of dissolution, as well as payments to any creditors, will be funded from amounts remaining out of the $1,906,348 held outside the trust account (as of December 31, 2020) plus up to $100,000 of funds from the trust account available to us to pay dissolution expenses, although we cannot assure you that there will be sufficient funds for such purpose.
If we were to expend all of the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants, other than the proceeds deposited in the trust account, and without taking into account interest, if any, earned on the trust account, the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders upon our dissolution would be $10.10. The proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to the claims of our creditors which would have higher priority than the claims of our public shareholders. We cannot assure you that the actual per-share redemption amount received by shareholders will not be less than $10.10. While we intend to pay such amounts, if any, we cannot assure you that we will have funds sufficient to pay or provide for all creditors’ claims.
Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public shareholders, there is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements or even if they execute such agreements that they would be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account including, but not limited, to fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain an advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any third-party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third-party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third-party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative.
Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third-party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Cowen and Company, LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC will not execute an agreement with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account. In order to

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

protect the amounts held in the trust account, our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third-party for services rendered or products sold to us (other than our independent registered public accounting firm), or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amounts in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.10 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest that may be withdrawn to pay our income tax obligations, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third-party or prospective target business that executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the trust account nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. In the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third-party, our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. However, we have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations.
None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.
In the event that the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.10 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the amount of interest which may be withdrawn to pay our income tax obligations, and our sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its indemnification obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment may choose not to do so in any particular instance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that due to claims of creditors the actual value of the per-share redemption price will not be less than $10.10 per public share.
We will seek to reduce the possibility that our sponsor will have to indemnify the trust account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses or other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the trust account. Our sponsor will also not be liable as to any claims under our indemnity of the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. We will have access to up to $1,906,348 of proceeds held outside the trust account (as of December 31, 2020) with which to pay any such potential claims (including costs and expenses incurred in connection with our liquidation, currently estimated to be no more than approximately $100,000). In the event that we liquidate and it is subsequently determined that the reserve for claims and liabilities is insufficient, shareholders who received funds from our trust account could be liable for claims made by creditors, however such liability will not be greater than the amount of funds from our trust account received by any such shareholder.
If we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, we cannot assure you we will be able to return $10.10 per public share to our public shareholders. Additionally, if we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, and thereby exposing itself and our

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

company to claims of punitive damages, by paying public shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons.
Our public shareholders are entitled to receive funds from the trust account only (i) in the event of the redemption of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, (ii) in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, or (iii) if they redeem their respective shares for cash upon the completion of the initial business combination. Public shareholders who redeem their Class A ordinary shares in connection with a shareholder vote described in clause (ii) in the preceding sentence shall not be entitled to funds from the trust account upon the subsequent completion of an initial business combination or liquidation if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, with respect to such Class A ordinary shares so redeemed. In no other circumstances will a shareholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust account. In the event we seek shareholder approval in connection with our initial business combination, a shareholder’s voting in connection with the business combination alone will not result in a shareholder’s redeeming its shares to us for an applicable pro rata share of the trust account. Such shareholder must have also exercised its redemption rights described above. These provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, like all provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, may be amended with a shareholder vote.
Competition
In identifying, evaluating and selecting a target business for our initial business combination, we may encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including other blank check companies, private equity groups and leveraged buyout funds, public companies, and operating businesses seeking strategic acquisitions. Many of these entities are well established and have extensive experience identifying and effecting business combinations directly or through affiliates.
Moreover, many of these competitors possess greater financial, technical, human and other resources than us. Our ability to acquire larger target businesses will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of a target business.
Furthermore, our obligation to pay cash in connection with our public shareholders who exercise their redemption rights may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination and our outstanding warrants, and the future dilution they potentially represent, may not be viewed favorably by certain target businesses. Either of these factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating an initial business combination.
Indemnity
Our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third-party (other than our independent auditors) for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amounts in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.10 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest that may be withdrawn to pay our income tax obligations, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third-party or prospective target business that executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the trust account nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Initial Public Offering against

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, in the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third-party, our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. However, we have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company.
Facilities
We currently maintain our executive offices at 2100 McKinney Ave, Suite 1675, Dallas, TX 75201.
The cost for our use of this space is included in the $10,000 per month fee we will pay to an affiliate of our sponsor for office space, administrative and support services. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
Employees
We currently have two executive officers. These individuals are not obligated to devote any specific number of hours to our matters but they intend to devote as much of their time as they deem necessary to our affairs until we have completed our initial business combination. The amount of time they will devote in any time period will vary based on whether a target business has been selected for our initial business combination and the stage of the business combination process we are in. We do not intend to have any full time employees prior to the completion of our initial business combination.
Periodic Reporting and Financial Information
We registered our units, Class A ordinary shares and warrants under the Exchange Act and have reporting obligations, including the requirement that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, our annual reports contain financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accountants.
We will provide shareholders with audited financial statements of the prospective target business as part of the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, sent to shareholders. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or reconciled to, GAAP, or IFRS, depending on the circumstances, and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame. We cannot assure you that any particular target business identified by us as a potential acquisition candidate will have financial statements prepared in accordance with the requirements outlined above, or that the potential target business will be able to prepare its financial statements in accordance with the requirements outlined above. To the extent that these requirements cannot be met, we may not be able to acquire the proposed target business. While this may limit the pool of potential acquisition candidates, we do not believe that this limitation will be material.
We will be required to evaluate our internal control procedures for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. A target business may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of their internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.
Prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, we will file a Registration Statement on Form 8-A with the SEC to voluntarily register our securities under Section 12 of the Exchange Act. As a result, we will be subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act. We have no current intention of filing a Form 15 to suspend our reporting or other obligations under the Exchange Act prior or subsequent to the consummation of our initial business combination.

24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We are a Cayman Islands exempted company. Exempted companies are Cayman Islands companies conducting business mainly outside the Cayman Islands and, as such, are exempted from complying with certain provisions of the Companies Act. As an exempted company, we applied for and expect to receive, after the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, a tax exemption undertaking from the Cayman Islands government that, in accordance with Section 6 of the Tax Concessions Act (as amended) of the Cayman Islands, for a period of 30 years from the date of the undertaking, no law which is enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any tax to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciations will apply to us or our operations and, in addition, that no tax to be levied on profits, income, gains or appreciations or which is in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax will be payable (i) on or in respect of our shares, debentures or other obligations or (ii) by way of the withholding in whole or in part of a payment of dividend or other distribution of income or capital by us to our shareholders or a payment of principal or interest or other sums due under a debenture or other obligation of us.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies”EGCs including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non- bindingnonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our stockholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an EGC until December 31, 2025, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000,000 as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an EGC as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
In addition,
Further, Section 107102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act alsoexempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company”a company can take advantageelect to opt out of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) ofand comply with the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwiserequirements that apply to private companies.non-EGCs but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.

Risks Related to NuScale’s Business and Industry

Commercialization Risk Factors

We have not yet commercialized or sold NPMs, and a number of factors could prevent, delay or hinder commercialization.

We have not yet entered into a binding contract with a customer to deliver NPMs, and there is no guarantee that we will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completionbe able to do so.

The planned initial deployment of our Initial Public Offering, (b) inNPM is subject to NuScale reaching a binding agreement for its scope of supply with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems (“UAMPS”) and UAMPS reaching a binding engineering, procurement, and construction (“EPC”) contract with Fluor. If NuScale and Fluor do not enter into binding agreements with UAMPS, deployment of our NPM, power plants, and ongoing services could be significantly delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Memoranda of understanding we have total annual gross revenueentered into with other potential purchasers are contingent and may not result in binding agreements for the purchase of at least $1.07 billion (as adjusted for inflation pursuantour products or services.

Competitors in China and Russia currently operate commercial SMRs and may have advantages in marketing their SMRs to SEC rules from timepotential customers.

Competitors in Russia and China, such as Rosatom and China National Nuclear Corporation, currently operate commercial SMRs in those countries. Although their SMR designs have not been approved by the NRC or in any jurisdiction outside of their native countries, those competitors may have a competitive advantage if they are able to time)obtain approval comparable to Standard Design Approval (“SDA”), or (c)if they can otherwise demonstrate to potential customers the value and benefits of their SMRs, particularly in jurisdictions that have less stringent regulatory requirements. In addition, these competitors may have access to greater government or other funding to develop and commercialize their SMRs than we do.

We may be required to reimburse UAMPS, our first customer, if we fail to achieve specified performance measures and subscription targets or if we terminate the relationship, and we must hold $26.5 million in restricted cash to secure our reimbursement obligations through December 31, 2022, and may have to hold up to $81 million to meet these reimbursement obligations through the end of 2023.

In conjunction with certain agreements awarded to Fluor related to the CFPP, pursuant to which we are deemeddeveloping the NRC license application for the CFPP and performing other site licensing and development activities, we entered into a Development Cost Reimbursement Agreement with CFPP LLC (the “DCRA”).
22



Under the DCRA, and subject to amendments set forth in Amendment 3 of the DCRA and the Long Lead Material Reimbursement Agreement described later in this risk factor, we may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs up to a specified cap, which varies based on the stage of project development, if (1) at specified times in the development of the CFPP, the estimated cost of electricity (based on increasingly accurate project cost estimates at various stages of development) exceeds an agreed target cost of $58.00/megawatt-hour (subject to adjustment as specified in the DCRA), or if Fluor does not timely provide a required comparison (which we refer to as an economic competitive test, or “ECT”), (2) the NRC does not issue SDA for the NuScale 6-module, 77MWe NPM design within one year after the NRC’s published date for such approval after acceptance of the SDA application, or (3) NuScale LLC materially breaches the DCRA and the DCRA is terminated for cause. The reimbursement obligation is also triggered if NuScale exercises its right to terminate the DCRA for convenience. The reimbursement percentage and cap is 100% and $57 million (subject to the discussion later in this risk factor about Amendment 3 of the DCRA and the Long Lead Material Reimbursement Agreement) until UAMPS or CFPP LLC submit a combined construction and operating license for approval to the NRC (“COLA”). After the COLA is submitted, the reimbursement percentage is 20% and (a) the cap for an ECT failure before final notice to proceed with NuScale plant construction is $60 million and (b) the cap for termination of the DCRA for cause is $120 million through delivery of a “Class 2” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -15% to +20%) and thereafter $180 million through the final notice to proceed, which requires a “Class 1” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -10% to +15%).

Under the DCRA, we are required to have credit support to fund the amount of our potential reimbursement of these net development costs. This letter of credit is updated quarterly based on an agreed upon forecasted estimate of net development costs. A stipulation of attaining the letter of credit is that we segregate funds from the operating bank accounts as collateral for the letter of credit. This account is identified as restricted cash in the amount of $26.5 million on our consolidated balance sheet and acts as collateral for the $26.0 million letter of credit outstanding at December 31, 2022. Because the cash is restricted, we may not use it for other expenditures, including research and development and commercialization expenses. Unless we find another means to collateralize this obligation, since NuScale’s customer will increase its spending on CFPP, the amount of cash the Company must treat as restricted cash will increase until the Company is relieved of its obligations under the DCRA.

As finalized on March 7, 2023, we entered into Amendment 3 of the DCRA and the Long Lead Material Reimbursement Agreement with CFPP LLC (the “LLM Agreement”), both effective as of February 28, 2023. The LLM Agreement relates to the long-lead materials that are incorporated into the NPMs (the “LLM”). The amended DCRA changed the Company’s potential refund obligations to UAMPS described above, if at specified times in the development of the CFPP, the estimated cost of electricity (based on increasingly accurate project cost estimates at various stages of development) exceeds an agreed target cost of $89.00/megawatt-hour (subject to adjustment as specified in the DCRA). In addition, the Company may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs if CFPP does not secure a total of 370 MWe of committed subscription obligation (the committed level of subscription as of February 28, 2023 was 120 MWe). Through the end of 2023, the Company may have to retain up to $81.0 million in restricted cash on our consolidated balance sheet to act as collateral for a letter of credit of similar value by December 31, 2023. Pursuant to the Amendment, the reimbursement obligations are now divided between the DCRA and the LLM Agreement such that (a) the aggregate cap for failure of an economic competitive test before final notice to proceed with NuScale plant construction is the amounts paid under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to an estimated $66 million plus $60 million under the DCRA; and (b) the cap for termination of the DCRA for cause is $120 million under the DCRA and the amounts paid under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to $50 million through delivery of a “Class 2” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -15% to +20%) and thereafter $180 million plus the amounts paid under the LLM Agreement, which may amount to an estimated $66 million through the final notice to proceed, which requires a “Class 1” project cost estimate (an estimate that is accurate within -10% to +15%). Should the Company be compelled to make the refund described above, the Company will have rights to the LLM free of any liens by UAMPS or CFPP. The Company is in discussions with DOE and CFPP LLC regarding the rights the Company may have to use the LLM for a project at the CFPP site or for another customer. The Company may have to pay costs to DOE (in addition to the refund to CFPP, LLC) to obtain the LLM free of liens from DOE to use the LLM for a project at the CFPP site or for another customer.

Any delays in the development and manufacture of NPMs and related technology may adversely impact our business and financial condition.

We have previously experienced, and may experience in the future, delays or other complications in the design, manufacture, production and delivery of NPMs and related technology that could prevent us from delivering NPMs in 2028 or beyond. If delays like this recur, if our remediation measures and process changes do not continue to be successful, if we fail to find a large accelerated filer, which means the market valuesatisfactory manufacturer or if we experience issues with planned manufacturing activities or design and safety, we could experience issues or delays in sustaining or further increasing production and sales of NPMs.
23



If we encounter difficulties in scaling our production and delivery capabilities, if we fail to develop and successfully commercialize our NPMs and related technologies, if we fail to develop such technologies before our competitors or if such technologies fail to perform as expected, are inferior to those of our Class A ordinary shares thatcompetitors or are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 millionperceived as of the prior June 30th, and (2) the date on which we have issued moreless safe than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the prior three-year period.
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market valuethose of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates equals or exceeds $250.0 million as of the prior June 30th,competitors, our business and (2)financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.

We have not yet delivered NPMs to customers, and any setbacks we may experience during our annual revenues equaled or exceed $100.0 million during such completed fiscal year or the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates equals or exceeds $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of any reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison or our financial statements withfirst commercial delivery and other public companies difficult or impossible.
Legal Proceedings
There is nodemonstration and commercial missions could have a material litigation, arbitration or governmental proceeding currently pending against us or any members of our management team in their capacity as such.

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below, together with the other information contained in this Report and the final prospectus associated with our Initial Public Offering, before making a decision to invest in our securities. If any of the following events occur,adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected. In that event, the trading priceof operation, and could harm our reputation.

The success of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to our Search for, and Consummation of our Inability to Consummate, a Business Combination
We have no operating history and no revenues, and you have no basisbusiness will depend on which to evaluate our ability to achievesuccessfully deliver NPMs to customers on-time and on-budget at guaranteed performance levels, which would tend to establish greater confidence in our subsequent customers. This means manufacturing all components to specification (satisfying quality inspection criteria) and delivering those components to the CFPP site on schedule and without delay or incident. There is no guarantee that our planned NPM deployments will be successful. There can be no assurance that we will not experience operational or process failures and other problems during our first commercial deployment or any planned deployment thereafter. Any failures or setbacks, particularly on our first commercial deployments, could harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business objective.and financial condition.
We are an exempted company formed on September 25, 2020 under the laws of the Cayman Islands and have no operating results. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of completing our initial business combination with one
Any actual or more target businesses. We have no plans, arrangementsperceived safety or understandings with any prospective target business concerning a business combination andreliability issues may be unable to complete our business combination. If we fail to complete our business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
Our expectations regarding changesresult in the Sustainability industry may not materialize to the extent we expect, or at all.
We expect favorable changes and growth in the Sustainability industry based on certain macroeconomic and social trends as well as certain assumptions. These macroeconomic and social trends and assumptions relate to, among other things, population growth, increased government spending in the Sustainability industry, increased regulatory requirements at the federal, state and local level and increased focus on ESG practices and business models. No assurance can be given that these trends and assumptions, or that our expectations surrounding the Sustainability industry, will be accurate. Further, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur and change the outlook surrounding the Sustainability industry in material ways. Accordingly, our expectations of growth in the Sustainability industry may occur to a different extent or at a different time, or may not occur at all. If our expectations surrounding certain favorable changes in the Sustainability industry do not occur to the degree that we expect, or at all, our ability to find a suitable initial business combination target and consummate an initial business combination may be hindered or delayed.
Our shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed initial business combination, which means we may complete our initial business combination even though a majority of our shareholders do not support such a combination.
We may choose not to hold a shareholder vote before we complete our initial business combination if the business combination would not require shareholder approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements. For instance, if we were seeking to acquire a target business where the consideration we were paying in the transaction was all cash, we would typically not be required to seek shareholder approval to complete such a transaction. Except as required by applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements, the decision as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed business combination or will allow shareholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek shareholder approval. Accordingly, we may complete our initial business combination even if holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares do not approve of the business combination we complete.
Your only opportunity to affect the investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.
At the time of your investment in us, you will not be provided with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of any target businesses. If our board of directors determines to complete a business combination without seeking shareholder approval, your only opportunity to affect the investment decision

26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

regarding a potential business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailedsignificant reputational harm to our public shareholders in which we describe our initial business combination.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and members of our management team have agreed to vote in favor of such initial business combination, regardless of how our public shareholders vote.
Our sponsor beneficially owns, on an as-converted basis, approximately 19.5% of our outstanding ordinary shares. Our sponsor and members of our management team also may from time to time purchase ordinary shares prior to our initial business combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that, if we seek shareholder approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if we obtain the approval of an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company. As a result,businesses, in addition to our initial shareholders’ founder shares, we would need 8,625,001,tort liability and other costs that may arise. Such issues could result in delaying or 37.5%cancelling planned deployments of the 23,000,000 public shares sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of an initial business combination in order to have our initial business combination approved. Accordingly, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, the agreement by our sponsor and each member of our management team to vote in favor of our initial business combination will increase the likelihood that we will receive the requisite shareholder approval for such initial business combination.
You will not have any rightsNPMs, increased regulation, or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares, potentially at a loss.
other systemic consequences. Our public shareholders are entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earlier to occur of (i) our completion of an initial business combination, and then only in connection with those Class A ordinary shares that such shareholders properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations described herein, (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly tendered in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, and (iii) the redemption of our public shares if we have not consummated an initial business within 24 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, subject to applicable law and as further described herein. Public shareholders who redeem their Class A ordinary shares in connection with a shareholder vote described in clause (ii) in the preceding sentence shall not be entitled to funds from the trust account upon the subsequent completion of an initial business combination or liquidation if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering with respect to such Class A ordinary shares so redeemed. In no other circumstances will a shareholder have any right or interest of any kind to or in the trust account. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares, potentially at a loss.
The ability of our public shareholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.
We may seek to enter into a business combination transaction agreement with a prospective target that requires as a closing condition that we have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. If too many public shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be ableinability to meet such closing condition and,our safety standards or adverse publicity affecting our reputation as a result would not be able to proceed with the business combination. Furthermore, in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). Consequently, if accepting all properly submitted redemption requests would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001of accidents or such greater amount necessary to satisfymechanical failures could have a closing condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemption and the related business combination and may instead search for an alternate business

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

combination. Prospective targets will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a business combination transaction with us.
The ability of our public shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure.
At the time we enter into an agreement for our initial business combination, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore will need to structure the transaction basedmaterial adverse effect on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If a large number of shares are submitted for redemption, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the trust account or arrange for additional third-party financing. Raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable business combination available to us or optimize our capital structure. The amount of the deferred underwriting commission payable to the underwriters will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial business combination. The per-share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commission and after such redemptions, the amount held in trust will continue to reflect our obligation to pay the entire deferred underwriting commissions.financial condition.
The ability of our public shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your shares.
If our initial business combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful is increased. If our initial business combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account until we liquidate the trust account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your shares in the open market; however, at such time our shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the trust account. In either situation, you may suffer a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with our redemption until we liquidate or you are able to sell your shares in the open market.
The requirement that we consummate an initial business combination within 18 months after the closing of our Initial Public Offering, or prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a business combination and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets, in particular as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our initial business combination on terms that would produce value for our shareholders.
Any potential target business with which we enter into negotiations concerning a business combination will be aware that we must consummate an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, or prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business combination, knowing that if we do not complete our initial business combination with that particular target business, we may be unable to complete our initial business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to the time frame described above. In addition, we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our initial business combination on terms that we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation.
Our sponsor has the right to extend the term we have to consummate our initial business combination up to 24 months, without providing our stockholders with redemption rights.
We have until 18 months fromincurred significant losses since inception, we expect to incur losses in the closing of our Initial Public Offering to consummate our initial business combination. However, if we anticipate thatfuture, and we may not be able to consummateachieve or maintain profitability.

We have incurred significant losses since our initial business combination within 18 months, we may, by resolution of our board if requested by our sponsor, extend

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

inception well beyond the initial period of time to consummate an initial business combination one time, by an additional six months (for a total of up to 24 months to complete an initial business combination), subject to the sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees purchasing additional private placement warrants and depositing the proceeds into the trust account as set out below. Our shareholders will not be entitled to vote or redeem their public shares in connection with any such extension. In order to extend the initial period of time to consummate an initial business combination, our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees, upon no less than five days’ advance notice to us prior to expiration of the initial 18-month deadline, must purchase an additional 2,300,000 private placement warrants at $1.00 per warrant and deposit the $2,300,000 in proceeds into the trust account on or prior to the date of on or prior to the date of the expiration of the initial 18-month deadline, for such six-month extension.
This feature is different than the traditional special purpose acquisition company structure, in which any extension of the company’s period to complete a business combination requires a vote of the company’s shareholders and shareholders have the right to redeem their public shares in connection with such vote.
Our sponsor may decide not to extend the termsupport we have to consummate our initial business combination, in which case we would cease all operations except forreceived through cost-sharing awards from the purpose of winding up and we would redeem our public shares and liquidate, and the rights and warrants will be worthless.
Our sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees are not obligated to purchase private placement warrants to extend the initial time period for us to complete our initial business combination. If we are unable to consummate our initial business combination within the applicable time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law.
Our search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the status of debt and equity markets.
The COVID-19 outbreak has resulted in, and a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases could result in, a widespread health crisis that has, and in the future could, adversely affected the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be unable to complete a business combination if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 continues to restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential investors, limit the ability to conduct due diligence, or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers are unavailable to negotiate and consummate a transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of and perceptions to COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue, our ability to consummate a business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected.
In addition, our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing which may be impacted by COVID-19 and other events, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity in third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all.

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Finally, the outbreak of COVID-19 or other infectious diseases may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, such as those related to the market for our securities.
DOE. We may not be able to consummate an initial business combination within 18 months after the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, in which case we would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and we would redeem our public shares and liquidate, in which case our public shareholders may receive only $10.10 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may not be able to find a suitable target business and consummate an initial business combination within 18 months after the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period. Our ability to complete our initial business combination may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other risks described herein, including as a result of terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of infectious diseases. For example, the outbreak of COVID-19 continues both in the U.S. and globally and, while the extent of the impact of the outbreak on us will depend on future developments, it could limit our ability to complete our initial business combination, including as a result of increased market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all. Additionally, the outbreak of COVID-19 and other events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of other infectious diseases) may negatively impact businesses we may seek to acquire.
If we have not consummated an initial business combination within such applicable time period, we will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equalyet delivered NPMs or our flagship plants, named VOYGR, to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any); and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that, if we wind up for any other reason prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, we will follow the foregoing procedures with respect to the liquidation of the trust account as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, subject to applicable Cayman Islands law. In either such case, our public shareholders may receive only $10.10 per public share, or less than $10.10 per public share, on the redemption of their shares, and our warrants will expire worthless. See “— If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.10 per public share” and other risk factors herein.
Our search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially adversely affected by the recent coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak.
In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China, which has and is continuing to spread throughout China and other parts of the world, including the United States. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” On January 31, 2020, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex M. Azar II declared a public health emergency for the United States to aid the U.S. healthcare community in responding to COVID-19, and on March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization characterized the outbreak as a “pandemic.” A significant outbreak of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases could result in a widespread health crisis that could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential target business with which we consummate a business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may be

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

unable to complete a business combination if continued concerns relating to COVID-19 restrict travel, limit the ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers are unavailable to negotiate and consummate a transaction in a timely manner. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our search for a business combination will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. If the disruptions posed by COVID-19 or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate a business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be adversely affected in a material way.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase public shares or warrants, which may influence a vote on a proposed business combination and reduce the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or public warrants.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase public shares or warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business combination, although they are under no obligation to do so. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase public shares or warrants in such transactions.
In the event that our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from public shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of any such transaction could be to (1) vote in favor of the business combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the business combination, (2) reduce the number of public warrants outstanding or vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial business combination or (3) satisfy a closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our initial business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. Any such purchases of our securities may result in the completion of our initial business combination that may not otherwise have been possible. In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or public warrants may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a national securities exchange. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements. See “Item 1. Business — Permitted Purchases and Other Transactions with Respect to Our Securities” for a description of how our sponsor, directors, executive officers, advisors or their affiliates will select which shareholders to purchase securities from in any private transaction.
If a shareholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our initial business combination, or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with the proxy rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our initial business combination. Despite our compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to receive our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, such shareholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will describe the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly redeem or tender public shares. In the event that a shareholder fails to comply with these procedures, its shares may not be redeemed.
As the number of special purpose acquisition companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer and there may be more competition for attractive targets. This could increase the cost

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of our initial business combination and could even result in our inability to find a target or to consummate an initial business combination.
In recent years, the number of special purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially. Many potential targets for special purpose acquisition companies have already entered into an initial business combination, and there are still many such companies currently in registration. As a result, at times, fewer attractive targets may be available,customers, and it may require more time, more effort, and more resources to identify a suitable target and to consummate an initial business combination. In addition, because there are more special purpose acquisition companies seeking to enter into an initial business combination with available targets, the competition for available targets with attractive fundamentals or business models may increase, which could cause target companies to demand improved financial terms. Attractive deals could also become scarcer for other reasons, such as economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical tensions or increases in the cost of additional capital needed to close business combinations or operate targets post-business combination. This could increase the cost of delay or otherwise complicate or frustrate our ability to find and consummate an initial business combination and may result in our inability to consummate an initial business combination on terms favorable to our investors altogether.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be moreis difficult for us to completepredict our initial business combination. If we have not consummatedfuture operating results. As a result, our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per public share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (whichlosses may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources or more local industry knowledgelarger than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire with the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of our public shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our initial business combination in conjunction with a shareholder vote or via a tender offer. Target companies will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for our initial business combination. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per public share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless. See “— If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.10 per public share” and other risk factors herein.
If the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants not being held in the trust account are insufficient to allow us to operate for 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, until the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, it could limit the amount available to fund our search for a target business or businesses and our ability to complete our initial business combination,anticipated, and we will depend on loans from our sponsor, its affiliates or members of our management team to fund our search and to complete our initial business combination.
As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $1,906,348 available to us outside the trust account to fund our working capital requirements. We believe that the funds available to us outside of the trust account, together with funds available from loans from our sponsor, its affiliates or members of our management team will be sufficient to allow us to operate for 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, until the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period;

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

however, we cannot assure you that our estimate is accurate, and our sponsor, its affiliates or members of our management team are under no obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Of the funds available to us, we may use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies or investors on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination, although we do not have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business.
If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our sponsor, its affiliates, members of our management team or other third parties to operate or may be forced to liquidate. Neither our sponsor, members of our management team nor their affiliates is under any obligation to us in such circumstances. Any such advances may be repaid only from funds held outside the trust account or from funds released to us upon completion of our initial business combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants of the post-business combination entity at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the private placement warrants. Prior to the completion of our initial business combination, we do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our sponsor, its affiliates or members of our management team as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease operations and liquidate the trust account. Consequently, our public shareholders may only receive an estimated $10.10 per public share, or possibly less, on our redemption of our public shares, and our warrants will expire worthless. See “—If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.10 per public share” and other risk factors herein.
We may seek business combination opportunities with a high degree of complexity that require significant operational improvements, which could delay or prevent us from achieving our desired results.
We may seek business combination opportunities with large, highly complex companies that we believe would benefit from operational improvements. While we intend to implement such improvements, to the extent that our efforts are delayed or we are unable to achieve the desired improvements, the business combination may not be as successful asachieve profitability when expected or at all; even if we anticipate.
To the extent we complete our initial business combination with a large complex business or entity with a complex operating structure, we may also be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine, which could delay or prevent us from implementing our strategy. Although our management team will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business and its operations,do, we may not be able to properly ascertainmaintain or assess allincrease profitability.

We expect our operating expenses to increase over the next several years as we commence deployment of NPMs, continue to refine and streamline our design and manufacturing processes for our NPMs, make technical improvements, hire additional employees and continue research and development efforts relating to new products and technologies. These efforts may be more costly than we expect and may not result in increased revenue, profits or growth in our business. Any failure to increase our revenue sufficiently to keep pace with our expenses could prevent us from achieving or maintaining profitability or positive cash flow. Furthermore, if our future growth and operating performance fail to meet investor or analyst expectations, or if we have future negative cash flow or losses resulting from our investment in acquiring customers or expanding our operations, this could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The cost of electricity generated from nuclear sources or our NPMs may not be cost competitive with other electricity generation sources in some markets, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

Some electricity markets experience very low power prices due to a combination of subsidized renewables and low-cost fuel sources, and NuScale may not be able to compete in these markets unless the benefits of the significantcarbon-free, reliable and/or resilient energy generation provided by our NPMs are sufficiently valued in the market. Given the relatively lower electricity prices in the United States when compared to many international markets, the risk factors untilmay be greater with respect to business in the United States. Inflation may also increase the cost of our NPMs to a point where the LCOE of electricity generated from a NuScale Plant is not competitive with the alternatives.

The market for SMRs generating nuclear power is not yet established and may not achieve the growth potential we completeexpect or may grow more slowly than expected.

The market for SMRs has not yet been established. Our estimates for the total addressable market are based on a number of internal and third-party estimates, including our potential contracted revenue, the number of potential customers who have expressed interest in our NPMs, assumed prices and production costs for our NPMs, our ability to leverage our current logistical and operational processes, and general market conditions. However, our assumptions and the data underlying our
24


estimates may not be correct and the conditions supporting our assumptions or estimates may change at any time, thereby reducing the predictive accuracy of these underlying factors. As a result, our estimates of the annual total addressable market for our services, as well as the expected growth rate for the total addressable market for our services, may prove to be incorrect.

Our commercialization strategy relies heavily on our relationship with Fluor and other strategic investors and partners, who may have interests that diverge from ours and who may not be easily replaced if our relationships terminate.

We rely heavily upon our relationship with Fluor, our majority owner, and our relationships with other of our investors and strategic partners to commercialize our NPM and our other products and services. We granted Fluor certain rights to provide engineering, procurement and construction services in connection with NuScale’s general plant design, project-specific designs and services typically performed by Fluor or its direct competitors. Similarly, we have entered into certain agreements with Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction Company, Ltd., IHI Corporation, and Sarens Nuclear & Industrial Services, LLC for certain planning, engineering, manufacturing and support activities, and JGC Holdings Corporation, an affiliate of Japan NuScale Innovation, LLC, related to the EPC and commissioning of the first NuScale plant in the United States and in other specific geographic areas, and with Samsung C&T Corporation related to certain EPC activities.

Our strategic partners may have interests that diverge from our interests, and which may hinder our ability to negotiate sales to customers. If we lose our agreements with strategic partners, we may need to find new contractors who may have less experience designing and building nuclear plants. This could substantially hinder our ability to expand our production capacity and installation of VOYGR plants and could affect our business combination.and our prospects.

We may be unable to manage our future growth effectively, which could make it difficult to execute our business strategy.

If our operations grow as planned, we may need to expand our sales and marketing, research and development, supply and manufacturing functions, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to scale the business and the manufacture of NPMs as planned, as there is no guarantee that we will be able to find suitable locations or partners for the expanded manufacture and operation of our NPMs or to broaden our internal capabilities.
Any failure to effectively incorporate updates to the design, construction and operations of NuScale plants to ensure cost competitiveness could reduce the marketability of the NuScale design and has the potential to impact deployment schedules.

Updating the design, construction, and operations of NuScale plants will be necessary to their competitiveness and attractiveness in the market, particularly in the United States where the price of power is generally lower than in other countries. If we are not able to achieve and maintain cost-competitiveness in the United States or elsewhere, our desired operational improvements, business could be materially and adversely affected.

If manufacturing and construction issues are not identified prior to design finalization, long-lead procurement, and/or the improvements take longermodule fabrication, then those issues will be realized during production, fabrication, or construction and may impact plant deployment cost and schedule.

Our NPM design will be actively managed through design reviews, prototyping, involvement of external partners and application of industry lessons, but we could still fail to implement than anticipated, we may not achieve the gains that we anticipate. Furthermore, some of these risksidentify latent manufacturing and complexities may be outsideconstruction issues early enough to avoid negative effects on production, fabrication, construction or ultimate performance of our controlNPMs or plants. Where these issues arise at such later stages of deployment, plant deployment could be subject to greater costs or be significantly delayed, which could materially and leave usadversely affect our business.

We and our customers operate in a politically sensitive environment, and the public perception of nuclear energy can affect our customers and us.

The risks associated with no ability to control or reduceradioactive materials and the chances thatpublic perception of those risks and complexities will adversely impact a targetcan affect our business. Such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a smaller, less complex organization.
Our shareholders may be held liable for claimsOpposition by third parties against uscan delay or prevent the construction of new nuclear power plants and can limit the operation of nuclear reactors. Adverse public reaction to developments in the use of nuclear power could directly affect our customers and indirectly affect our business. In the past, adverse public reaction, increased regulatory scrutiny and litigation have contributed to extended construction periods for new nuclear reactors, sometimes delaying construction schedules by
25


decades or more or even shutting down operations. In addition, anti-nuclear groups in Germany successfully lobbied for the adoption of the Nuclear Exit Law in 2002, which requires the shutdown of all German nuclear power plants by the end of April 2023. Adverse public reaction could also lead to increased regulation or limitations on the activities of our customers, more onerous operating requirements or other conditions that could have a material adverse impact on our customers and our business.

Accidents involving nuclear power facilities, including but not limited to events similar to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
If we are forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholdersThree Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accidents, or terrorist acts or other high-profile events involving radioactive materials could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that immediately followingmaterially and adversely affect our customers and the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall duemarkets in the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore,

33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves and our company to claims, by paying public shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors. Claims may be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized or permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share premium account while we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable for a fine of $18,292.68 and imprisonment for five years in the Cayman Islands.
We may not hold an annual general meeting until after the consummation of our initial business combination.
In accordance with Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual meeting until no later than one year after our first fiscal year end following our listing on Nasdaq. As an exempted company, there is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or general meetings to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, public shareholders may not be afforded the opportunity to appoint directors and to discuss company affairs with management. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being appointed in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual general meeting) serving a three-year term.
Although we have identified general criteria that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria, and as a result, the target business with which we enter intooperate and increase regulatory requirements and costs that could materially and adversely affect our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria.business.
Although we have identified general criteria
Our future prospects are dependent upon a certain level of public support for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possiblenuclear power. Nuclear power faces strong opposition from certain competitive energy sources, individuals and organizations. The accident that occurred at the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan in 2011 increased public opposition to nuclear power in some countries, resulting in a target business with which we enter into our initial business combination will not haveslowdown in, or, in some cases, a complete halt to new construction of nuclear power plants, an early shut down of existing power plants or a dampening of the favorable regulatory climate needed to introduce new nuclear technologies, all of these positive attributes. If we completewhich could negatively impact our initial business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these criteria, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet our general criteria, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by applicable law or stock exchange rule, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our initial business combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria. If we do not complete our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only approximately $10.00 per public share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account.
We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting or investment banking firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our initial business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that the price we are paying is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We may issue additional Class A ordinary shares or preference shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares upon the conversion of the founder shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination asprospects. As a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated memorandum and articlesFukushima accident, some countries that were considering launching new domestic nuclear power programs delayed or cancelled the preparatory activities they were planning to undertake as part of association. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our initial shareholders may receive additional Class A ordinary shares if we issue shares to consummate an initial business combination.
The founder shares will automatically convert into Class A ordinary shares on the first business day following the consummation of our initial business combination at a ratio such that the number of Class A ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of all founder shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum of (i) the total number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding (excluding the private placement shares) upon completion of our Initial Public Offering, plus (ii) the sum of the total number of Class A ordinary shares issued or deemed issued or issuable upon conversion or exercise of any equity-linked securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the Company in connection with or in relationprograms. If accidents similar to the consummation of the initialFukushima disaster or other events, such as terrorist attacks involving nuclear facilities, occur, public opposition to nuclear power may increase, regulatory requirements and costs could become more onerous and customer demand for our NPMs could suffer, which could materially and adversely affect our business combination, excluding any Class A ordinary shares or equity-linked securities exercisable for or convertible into Class A ordinary shares issued, deemed issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the initial business combination and any private placement shares issued to our sponsor, members of our management team or any of their affiliates upon conversion of working capital loans. In no event will the Class B ordinary shares convert into Class A ordinary shares at a rate of less than one to one.operations.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete our initial business combination with which a substantial majority of our shareholders do not agree.
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association do not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). As a result, we may be able to complete our initial business combination even though a substantial majority of our public shareholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all Class A ordinary shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, all Class A ordinary shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate business combination.
In order to effectuate an initial business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing instruments. We may seek to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and governing instruments. For example, blank check companies have amended the definition of business combination, increased redemption thresholds, and extended the time to consummate a business combination. Amending our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association require at least a special resolution of our shareholders as a matter of Cayman Islands law, meaning the approval of holders of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company. In addition, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association require us to provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 24 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally change the nature of the securities offered through our Initial Public Offering, we would register, or seek an exemption from registration for, the affected securities.
Our initial shareholders control a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Our initial shareholders own, on an as-converted basis, 20% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares (excluding the private placement shares). Accordingly, they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. If our initial shareholders purchase any additional Class A ordinary shares in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase their control. Neither our sponsor nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities, other than as disclosed in this Report. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration of the current trading price of our Class A ordinary shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were elected by our sponsor, is divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being appointed in each year. We may not hold an annual general meeting to appoint new directors prior to the completion of our initial business combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the business combination. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for election and our sponsor, because of its ownership position, will control the outcome, as only holders of our Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of directors and to remove directors prior to our initial business combination. Accordingly, our sponsor will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our initial business combination. In addition, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive agreement regarding an initial business combination without the prior consent of our sponsor.
After our initial business combination, it is possible that a majority of our directors and officers will live outside the United States and all of our assets will be located outside the United States; therefore investorssupply base may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or their other legal rights.scale to the production levels necessary to meet sales projections.
It is possible that after
NuScale does not have manufacturing assets and relies on third party manufacturers to build our initial business combination, a majority ofNPMs and associated equipment. Moreover, we are dependent on future supplier capability to meet production demands attendant to our directors and officers will reside outsideforecasts. If our supply chain cannot meet the schedule demands of the United Statesmarket, our projected sales revenues could be materially impacted.

Lack of availability and allcost of component raw materials may affect the manufacturing processes for plant equipment and increase our assets will be located outsidecosts.

Recent global supply chain disruptions have increasingly affected both the availability and cost of the United States. As araw materials, component manufacturing and deliveries. These disruptions may result it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for investorsdelays in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon all ofequipment deliveries and cost escalations that could adversely affect our directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penaltiesbusiness.

We are highly dependent on our directorssenior management team and officers under United States laws.
In particular, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or any other applicable jurisdictions would recognizehighly skilled personnel, and enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States or entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands or any other applicable jurisdiction’s courts against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.
You will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of many other blank check companies.
Since the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement shares are intended to be used to complete an initial business combination with a target business that has not been selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank check” company under the United States securities laws. However, because we have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,001 upon the completion of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement shares and have filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact,if we are exempt from rules promulgated by the SEC to

36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

protect investorsnot successful in blank check companies, such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefitsattracting or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means that since our shares were immediately tradable and we have a longer period of time to complete our initial business combination than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if our Initial Public Offering were subject to Rule 419, that rule would have prohibited the release of any interest earned on funds held in the trust account to us unless and until the funds in the trust account were released to us in connection with our completion of an initial business combination.
Subsequent to our completion of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will identify all material issues with a particular target business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming preexisting debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining post-combination debt financing. Accordingly, any holders who choose to retain their securities following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
If third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than $10.10 per public share.
Our placing of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers (other than our independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public shareholders, such parties may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements, they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds held in the trust account. If any third-party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account, our management will perform an analysis of the alternatives available to it and will only enter into an agreement with a third-party that has not executed a waiver if management believes that such third-party’s engagement would be significantly more beneficial to us than any alternative.
Examples of possible instances where we may engage a third-party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Upon redemption of our public shares, if we have not consummated an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period or upon the exercise of a redemption right in connection with our initial business combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived that may be brought against us within the ten years following redemption. Accordingly, due to claims of such creditors, the per-share

37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

redemption amount received by public shareholders could be less than the $10.10 per public share initially held in the trust account. Pursuant to a letter agreement, our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third-party (other than our independent auditors) for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amounts in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.10 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest that may be withdrawn to pay our income tax obligations, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third-party or prospective target business that executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the trust account nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters of our Initial Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. Moreover, in the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third-party, our sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims.
However, we have not asked our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made against the trust account, the funds available for our initial business combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.10 per public share. In such event,retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to completesuccessfully implement our initial business combination, and you would receive such lesser amount per sharestrategy.

Our success depends, in connection with any redemption of your public shares. Nonesignificant part, on the continued services of our officerssenior management team and on our ability to attract, motivate, develop and retain a sufficient number of other highly skilled personnel, including engineers, manufacturing and quality assurance, finance, marketing and sales personnel. Our senior management team has extensive experience in the energy and manufacturing industries, and we believe that their depth of experience is instrumental to our continued success. The loss of any one or directors will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.
Our directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligationsmore members of our sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public shareholders.
In the event that the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.10 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.10 per public share due to reductions in the value of the trust assets, in each case net of the interest that may be withdrawn to pay our income tax obligations, and our sponsor asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account available for distribution to our public shareholders may be reduced below $10.10 per public share.
We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and executive officers.
We have agreed to indemnify our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the trust account and to not seek recourse against the trust accountsenior management team, for any reason, whatsoever (exceptincluding resignation or retirement, could impair our ability to the extent they are entitled to funds from the trust account due to their ownership of public shares). Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) weexecute our business strategy and have sufficient funds outside of the trust account or (ii) we consummate an initiala material adverse effect on our business combination. Our obligation to indemnify our officers and directors may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.” As a result, a bankruptcy or insolvency court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages, by paying public shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.
If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our shareholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
If, before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
Holders of Class A ordinary shares will not be entitled to vote on any appointment of directors we hold prior to our initial business combination.
Prior to our initial business combination, only holders of our founder shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of directors. Holders of our public shares will not be entitled to vote on the appointment of directors during such time. In addition, prior to our initial business combination, holders of a majority of our founder shares may remove a member of the board of directors for any reason. Accordingly, you may not have any say in the management of our company prior to the consummation of an initial business combination.
We are not registering the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time, and such registration may not be in place when an investor desires to exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise its warrants except on a cashless basis and potentially causing such warrants to expire worthless.
We are not registering the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act or any state securities laws at this time. However, under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed that, as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 20 business days after the closing of our initial business combination, we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement covering the issuance of such shares, and we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60 business days after the closing of our initial business combination and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement and a current prospectus relating to those Class A ordinary shares until the warrants expire or are redeemed. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement or prospectus relating to our Initial Public Offering, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current, complete or correct or the SEC issues a stop order. If the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the above requirements, we will be required to permit holders

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to exercise their warrants on a cashless basis, in which case, the number of Class A ordinary shares that you will receive upon cashless exercise will be based on a formula subject to a maximum amount of shares equal to 0.361 Class A ordinary shares per warrant (subject to adjustment). However, no warrant will be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration is available. Notwithstanding the above, if our Class A ordinary shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, require holders of public warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but we will use our commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. Exercising the warrants on a cashless basis could have the effect of reducing the potential “upside” of the holder’s investment in our company because the warrant holder will hold a smaller number of Class A ordinary shares upon a cashless exercise of the warrants they hold. In no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities or other compensation in exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws and no exemption is available.
If the issuance of the shares upon exercise of the warrants is not so registered or qualified or exempt from registration or qualification, the holder of such warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such warrant and such warrant may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the Class A ordinary shares included in the units. There may be a circumstance where an exemption from registration exists for holders of our private placement warrants to exercise their warrants while a corresponding exemption does not exist for holders of the public warrants included as part of units sold in our Initial Public Offering. In such an instance, our sponsor and its permitted transferees (which may include our directors and executive officers) would be able to exercise their warrants and sell the ordinary shares underlying their warrants while holders of our public warrants would not be able to exercise their warrants and sell the underlying ordinary shares. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right evencondition if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying Class A ordinary shares for sale under all applicable state securities laws. As a result, we may redeem the warrants as set forth above even if the holders are otherwise unable to exercise their warrants.successfully attract and retain qualified and highly skilled replacement personnel.
The warrants may become exercisable and redeemable for a security other than the Class A ordinary shares, and you will not have any information regarding such other security at this time.
In certain situations, including if we are not the surviving entity in our initial business combination, the warrants may become exercisable for a security other than the Class A ordinary shares. As a result, if the surviving company redeems your warrants for securities pursuant to the warrant agreement, you may receive a security in a company of which you do not have information at this time. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, the surviving company will be required to use commercially reasonable efforts to register the issuance of the security underlying the warrants within 20 business days of the closing of an initial business combination.
Because we are neither limited to evaluating a target business in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any specific target businesses with which to pursue our initial business combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations.
We may pursue business combination opportunities in any sector, except that we are not, under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, be permitted to effectuate our initial business combination solely with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Becauserequire additional future funding.

To date, we have not yet selectedgenerated any specific target business with respect to a business combination, there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects. To the extent we complete our initial business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

record of sales or earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. Although our officers and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment, if such opportunity were available, in a business combination target. Accordingly, any holders who choose to retain their securities following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
We may seek acquisition opportunities in industries or sectors which may or may not be outside of our management’s area of expertise.
We will consider a business combination outside of our management’s area of expertise if a business combination target is presented to us and we determine that such candidate offers an attractive acquisition opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular business combination target, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our securities will not ultimately prove to be less favorable to investors in our Initial Public Offering than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a business combination target. In the event we elect to pursue an acquisition outside of the areas of our management’s expertise, our management’s expertise may not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in this Report regarding the areas of our management’s expertise would not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management may not be able to adequately ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors. Accordingly, any holders who choose to retain their securities following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
Althoughmaterial revenue, while we have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter into our initial business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination with a target that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our initial business combination if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only approximately $10.10 per public share, or less in certain circumstances, on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless.
We are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent accounting or investment banking firm, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our initial business combination with an affiliated entity, we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that the price we are paying is fair to our shareholders from a financial

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed in our proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.
We may issue additional Class A ordinary shares or preferred shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares upon the conversion of the founder shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association authorizes the issuance of up to 300,000,000 Class A ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, 30,000,000 Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 1,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share. There are 277,000,000 and 24,250,000 authorized but unissued Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, respectively, available for issuance which amount does not take into account shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants or shares issuable upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares, if any. The Class B ordinary shares are automatically convertible into Class A ordinary shares (which such Class A ordinary shares delivered upon conversion will not have any redemption rights or be entitled to liquidating distributions from the trust account if we fail to consummate an initial business combination) at the time of our initial business combination or earlier at the option of the holders thereof as described herein and in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. There are no preference shares issued and outstanding.
We may issue a substantial number of additional Class A ordinary shares or preference shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares or upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions as set forth herein. However, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide, among other things, that prior to or in connection with our initial business combination, we may not issue additional shares that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the trust account or (ii) vote on any initial business combination or on any other proposal presented to shareholders prior to or in connection with the completion of an initial business combination. These provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, like all provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional ordinary or preference shares:

may significantly dilute the equity interest of our investors, which dilution would increase if the anti-dilution provisions in the Class B ordinary shares resulted in the issuance of Class A ordinary shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares;

may subordinate the rights of holders of Class A ordinary shares if preference shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded our Class A ordinary shares;

could cause a change in control if a substantial number of Class A ordinary shares are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors;

may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of us by diluting the share ownership or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain control of us;

may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our units, Class A ordinary shares and/or warrants; and

may not result in adjustment to the exercise price of our warrants.
Unlike some other similarly structured blank check companies, our sponsor will receive additional Class A ordinary shares if we issue shares to consummate an initial business combination.
The founder shares will automatically convert into Class A ordinary shares (which such Class A ordinary shares delivered upon conversion will not have any redemption rights or be entitled to liquidating

42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

distributions from the trust account if we fail to consummate an initial business combination) at the time of our initial business combination or earlier at the option of the holders thereof at a ratio such that the number of Class A ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of all founder shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum of (i) the total number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding upon completion of our initial offering, plus (ii) the total number of Class A ordinary shares issued or deemed issued or issuable upon conversion or exercise of any equity-linked securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the company in connection with or in relation to the consummation of the initial business combination, excluding any Class A ordinary shares or equity-linked securities exercisable for or convertible into Class A ordinary shares issued, deemed issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the initial business combination and any private placement warrants issued to our sponsor, any of its affiliates or any members of our management team upon conversion of working capital loans. In no event will the Class B ordinary shares convert into Class A ordinary shares at a rate of less than one-to-one. This is different than some other similarly structured blank check companies in which the initial shareholders will only be issued an aggregate of 20% of the total number of shares to be outstanding prior to the initial business combination.
Resources could be wasted in researching acquisitions that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We anticipate that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to complete our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a beneficial owner of our units, Class A ordinary shares or warrants, beneficial owner of our units, Class A ordinary shares or warrants, the U.S. who or that is (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (ii) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income tax regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust, if (a) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons (as defined in the Code) have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (b) it has a valid election in effect under Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person (a “U.S. Holder”), such U.S. holder may be subject to certain adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent taxable years may depend on whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up exception. Depending on the particular circumstances, the application of the start-up exception may be subject to uncertainty, and there cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception. Accordingly, there can be no assurances with respect to our status as a PFIC for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. Our actual PFIC status for any taxable year, however, will not be determinable until after the end of such taxable year (and, in the case of the start-up exception, potentially not until after the two taxable years following our current taxable year). Moreover, if we determine we are a PFIC for any taxable year, upon written request by a U.S. Holder, we will endeavor to provide to a U.S. Holder such information as the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) may require, including a PFIC Annual Information Statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a “qualified electing fund”

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

election, but there can be no assurance that we will timely provide such required information, and such election would be unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to consult their tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction in connection with our initial business combination and such reincorporation may result in taxes imposed on shareholders or warrant holders.
We may, in connection with our initial business combination and subject to requisite shareholder approval under the Companies Act, reincorporate in the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located or in another jurisdiction. The transaction may require a shareholder or warrant holder to recognize taxable income, or otherwise subject it to adverse tax consequences, in the jurisdiction in which the shareholder or warrant holder is a tax resident or in which its members are resident if it is a tax transparent entity.overhead expenses. We do not intendexpect to make any cash distributionsgenerate meaningful revenue unless and until we are able to shareholders or warrant holders to pay such taxes. Shareholders or warrant holders may be subject to withholding taxes or other taxes, or other adverse tax consequences, with respect to their ownershipfinalize development of us after the reincorporation.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction in connection withand commercialize our initial business combination,SMR technology and the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreementsrelated services, and we may not be able to enforcedo so on our legal rights.
Inanticipated timetable, if at all. We expect our expenses and capital expenditures to increase in connection with our initial business combination,ongoing activities, including developing and advancing our SMR and other products and services, obtaining further NRC design certifications of and SDAs for our SMR and completing our manufacturing preparation and trials. We also incur additional costs associated with operating as
26


a public company. Certain costs are not reasonably estimable at this time and we may relocate the home jurisdictionrequire additional funding and our projections anticipate certain customer-sourced income that is not guaranteed.

We may seek to raise capital through private or public equity or debt financings or through other sources of our business from the Cayman Islands to another jurisdiction. If we determine to do this, the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreements. The system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdictionfinancing. Adequate additional funding may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business opportunities or capital.
After our initial business combination, it is possible that a majority of our directors and officers will live outside the United States and all of our assets will be located outside the United States; therefore investors may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or their other legal rights.
It is possible that after our initial business combination, a majority of our directors and officers will reside outside of the United States and all of our assets will be located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon all of our directors or officers or to enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties on our directors and officers under United States laws.
In particular, there is uncertainty as to whether the courts of the Cayman Islands or any other applicable jurisdictions would recognize and enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States or entertain original actions brought in the Cayman Islands or any other applicable jurisdiction’s courts against us or our directors or officers predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States.
Risks Relating to our Sponsor and Management Team
We are dependent upon our executive officers and directors and their loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our executive officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our initial business combination. In addition, our executive officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence. We do not have an employment

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or executive officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or executive officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our ability to successfully effect our initial business combination and to be successful thereafter will be totally dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may join us following our initial business combination. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
Our ability to successfully effect our initial business combination is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the target business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior management, director or advisory positions following our initial business combination, it is likely that some or all of the management of the target business will remain in place. While we closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our initial business combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct and such management may not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular business combination, and a particular business combination may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation following our initial business combination and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular business combination is the most advantageous.
Our key personnel may remain with our company after the completion of our initial business combination only if they are able to negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities for services they would renderavailable to us after the completion of the business combination. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s retentionon acceptable terms or resignation a conditionat all. Our failure to any such agreement. The personalraise capital as and financial interests of such individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business. In addition, pursuant to a registration and shareholder rights agreement, our sponsor, upon and following consummation of an initial business combination, will be entitled to nominate three individuals for appointment to our board of directors, as long as the sponsor holds any securities covered by the registration and shareholder rights agreement, which is described under the section of this Report entitled “Description of Securities — Registration and Shareholder Rights.”
The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The loss of a business combination target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place.
Our executive officers and directors will allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interestwhen needed could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial business combination.
Our executive officersfinancial condition and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their time between our operations and our search for a business combination and their other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the completion of our initial business combination. Each of our executive officers is engaged in

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

several other business endeavors for which he may be entitled to substantial compensation, and our executive officers are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs. Our independent directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities. If our executive officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to completepursue our initial business combination.
Our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the futurestrategies. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders will experience dilution. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may have, additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities, including another blank check company, and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Until we consummate our initial business combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses or entities. Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future may have, additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entity, subject to his or her fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential target business may be presented to another entity prior to its presentation to us, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law.
In addition, our sponsor, officers and directors may in the future become affiliated with other blank check companies that may have acquisition objectives that are similar to ours. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential target business may be presented to such other blank check companies prior to its presentation to us, subject to our officers’ and directors’ fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that we renounce our interest in any business combination opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company and it is an opportunity that we are able to complete on a reasonable basis.
Since our sponsor, executive officers, directors and other affiliates will lose their entire investment in us if our initial business combination is not completed (other than with respect to public shares they may have acquired during or may acquire after our Initial Public Offering), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular business combination target is appropriate for our initial business combination.
On August 21, 2020, our sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share, to cover certain expenses on our behalf in consideration of 7,187,500 Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001. In September 2020, our sponsor transferred 40,000 Class B ordinary shares to each of our directors. On October 22, 2020, our sponsor effected a surrender of 1,437,500 founder shares to the company for no consideration, resulting in a decrease in the number of Class B ordinary shares outstanding from 7,187,500 to 5,750,000, such that the total number of founder shares would represent 20% of the total number of ordinary shares outstanding upon completion of our Initial Public Offering. Our sponsor transferred all of the founder shares held by it to holdco prior to the consummation of our Initial Public Offering. Prior to the initial investment in the company of $25,000 by the sponsor, the company had no assets, tangible or intangible. The per share price of the founder shares was determined by dividing the amount contributed to the company by the number of founder shares issued. The founder shares will be worthless if we do not complete an initial business combination. In addition, our sponsor purchased an aggregate of 8,900,000 private placement warrants, each exercisable to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a price of $1.00 per warrant ($8,900,000 in the aggregate), in a private placement that closed simultaneously with the closing of our Initial Public Offering. If we do not consummate an initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, the private placement warrants will expire worthless. While we do not expect our board of directors to approve any amendment to or waiver of the letter agreement or registration and shareholder rights agreement prior to our initial business combination, it may be possible that our board of directors, in exercising its business judgment and subject to its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to or waivers of such agreements in connection with the consummation of our initial business combination. Any such amendments or

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

waivers would not require approval from our shareholders, may result in the completion of our initial business combination that may not otherwise have been possible, and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities. The personal and financial interests of our executive officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business combination, completing an initial business combination and influencing the operation of the business following the initial business combination. This risk may become more acute as the 18-month anniversary of the closing of our Initial Public Offering, the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or the end of any Extension Period nears, which is the deadline for our consummation of an initial business combination.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments as of the date of this Report to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt following our Initial Public Offering, we may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our initial business combination. We and our officers have agreed that we will not incur any indebtedness unless we have obtained from the lender a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to the monies held in the trust account. As such, no issuance of debt will affect the per-share amount available for redemption from the trust account. Nevertheless, the incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:

default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;

acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;

restrict our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt is payable on demand;

our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt is outstanding;

our inability to pay dividends on our Class A ordinary shares;

using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our Class A ordinary shares if declared, expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;

increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and

operations including limitations on our ability to borrowincur liens or additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt, service requirements, executionpay dividends, repurchase our securities, make certain investments, and engage in certain merger, consolidation or asset sale transactions. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms that are not favorable to us or our stockholders and members. If the needed financing is not available, or if the terms of financing are less desirable than we expect, we may be required to delay, scale back or terminate some or all of our strategyresearch and development programs.

Our funding plan relies on cost-shared funding provided through a cooperative agreement with the DOE. Significant funding has been received from the DOE under four separate cost-share awards granted since 2013. As of March 1, 2023, the DOE had obligated $248 million to the current award; of which $225 million was collected from the DOE through December 31, 2022. The overall DOE contribution to NuScale LLC commercialization funding is more than $548 million. The current DOE award is a $700 million award ($350 million in government funding to be matched by $350 million in private funding). We have proposed to revise the preceding to $657 million ($328.5 million in government funding to be matched by $328.5 million in private funding). Funding is subject to at least annual Congressional appropriations, which may not be forthcoming. President Biden’s 2024 fiscal year budget proposal to Congress for advanced SMR research and development has not been submitted. The federal budget process is complex—the budget justification and Presidential budget requests are often incomplete; Congress may appropriate different amounts than those requested; and the DOE has varying degrees of discretion to reprogram or transfer appropriated funds. Nonetheless, to the extent Presidential budget requests or DOE budget justifications result in a shift of Congressional appropriations away from SMR funding generally or projects we are developing specifically, those shifts could materially and adversely affect the amount of DOE funding available to us and our business.NuScale and CFPP are requesting a fiscal year 2024 appropriation of $418 million for advanced SMR research and development, however, the entirety of the appropriations requested for the 2023 fiscal year was not fulfilled.

If we are unable to continue as a going concern, we may be forced to liquidate our assets and the values we receive for our assets in liquidation or dissolution could be significantly lower than the values reflected in our financial statements.

As part of our arrangements with the DOE, we granted the DOE a worldwide, nonexclusive, paid-up license to our intellectual property and to manufacture our SMR technology, and the right to sublicense those rights if specified conditions arise, including if the DOE terminates the award due to material failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the award, or if we fail to meet our cost-sharing obligations or cease developing our SMR. As a result, if we are unable to continue as a going concern, the value of our intellectual property, including in liquidation, may be difficult to assess.

Our ability to protect our patents and other purposesproprietary rights may be challenged and is not guaranteed, exposing us to the possible loss of competitive advantage.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secret, and commercial agreements such as confidentiality agreements, assignment agreements and license agreements to protect the intellectual property associated with our NPMs and related technologies. These measures prevent third parties from using, practicing, selling, manufacturing, or otherwise commercially exploiting our NPMs and related technologies, which would erode our competitive position in our market. Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and enforce patent protection for our NPMs, as well as our ability to operate without infringing on or violating the proprietary rights of others. We own and have licensed rights to patents and pending patent applications and will continue to file patent applications claiming new technologies directed to NPMs in the United States and in other disadvantages comparedjurisdictions based on factors such as commercial viability.

As with all industries, the patent position of power modules and nuclear energy companies generally is uncertain and is not a guaranteed right. During the patent procurement process, a patent office may require us or our licensors to narrow the scope of the claims of our competitors who have less debt.or our licensors’ pending and future patent applications. This may limit the scope of patent protection and our or our licensors’ ability to claim patent infringement if the patent application is subsequently issued. In some cases, a patent application may not issue if we or our licensors are unable to overcome rejections from a patent office. If a patent application does not issue, we or our licensors may lose trade secrets that are disclosed and published in the
27


Wepatent application and third parties may only be able to completeexploit such published information in our patent application. Additionally, even if we obtain a patent registration in one business combination withjurisdiction (e.g., the proceedsUnited States), we cannot guarantee that we will obtain a patent registration for the same or related patent application in another jurisdiction (e.g., China) as patent laws differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Additionally, maintaining and enforcing patent rights can involve complex legal and factual questions and may be subject to litigation in some cases. For example, third parties may challenge the validity of our Initial Public Offeringor our licensors’ patents based on prior art at a tribunal such as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the saleUnited States Patent and Trademark Office and/or in a federal court. Because we cannot assure that all of the private placement warrants, which will cause uspotentially relevant prior art relating to be solely dependent onour patents and patent applications has been found, third parties may prevail in invalidating a single business whichpatent or preventing a patent application from being issued as a patent. If we or our licensors are able to maintain valid patents or prevail in patent challenges instituted by third parties, we or our licensors may have a limited numberstill bear the risk of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impactthird parties “designing around” our operations and profitability.technologies to avoid an intellectual property infringement claim.
The net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants initially provided us with $224,250,000 that we may use to complete our initial business combination (after taking into account the $8,050,000 of deferred underwriting commissions being held in the trust account and the non-reimbursed expenses of our Initial Public Offering).
We enjoy only limited geographical protection with respect to certain patents and may effectuatenot be able to protect our initial business combination with a single-target businessintellectual property rights throughout the world.

We do not have worldwide patent rights for our NPMs and related technologies because there is no such thing as worldwide or multiple-target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of time. However,“international patent rights.” Accordingly, we may not be able to effectuateprotect our

47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

initial business combination with more than one target business intellectual property rights in certain jurisdictions and their legal systems. Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our NPMs worldwide can pose several challenges. First, procuring patent rights in multiple jurisdictions would be cost prohibitive because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issuesindividual patent offices in different jurisdictions will have to examine each patent application separately. Therefore, costs such as examination fees, translation fees and the requirement thatattorney fees are considered. Once a patent is registered, we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By completingor our initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which maylicensors will also have the resourcescontinued obligation of paying maintenance fees periodically to complete several business combinationsavoid patents from becoming abandoned or lapsed. Second, the breadth of claims in different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our successpatents may be:

solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset; or

dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.
This lack of diversificationvary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For instance, certain patent offices may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industryrequire narrower claims, resulting in which we may operate subsequent to our initial business combination.
We may attempt to simultaneously complete business combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete our initial business combination and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to simultaneously acquire several businessespatent rights that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and delay our ability, to complete our initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence (if there are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact our profitability and results of operations.
We may attempt to complete our initial business combination with a private or early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of revenue or earnings about which little information is available, which may result in a business combination with a company that is notless extensive. Further, as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing our acquisition strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial business combination with a privately held company, an early stage company, a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of sales or earnings. As a result, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine. These risks include investing in a business without a proven business model and with limited historical financial data, volatile revenues or earnings, intense competition and difficulties in obtaining and retaining key personnel. Although our directors and officers will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business,noted above, we may not be able to properly ascertainobtain patents in some jurisdictions even if we obtain patents in other jurisdictions. Accordingly, our competitors may operate in countries where we do not have patent protection and can freely use our technologies and discoveries in such countries to the extent such technologies and discoveries are publicly known or assess alldisclosed in countries where we do have patent protection or pending patent applications.

In addition, many countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner may be compelled to grant licenses to third parties. Many countries also limit the enforceability of patents against government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, the patent owner may have limited remedies, which could materially diminish the value of such patent. If we or any of our licensors are forced to grant a license to third parties with respect to any patents relevant to our business, our competitive position may be impaired, and our business and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may not identify relevant third-party patents or may incorrectly interpret the relevance, scope or expiration of a third-party patent, which might adversely affect our ability to develop and market NPMs.

We cannot guarantee that any of our patent searches or analyses, including the identification of relevant patents, the scope of patent claims or the expiration of relevant patents, are complete or thorough because there may be hundreds of thousands of relevant patents worldwide. We also cannot be certain that we have identified each and every third-party patent and pending application in the United States and abroad that is relevant to or necessary for the commercialization of NPMs in any jurisdiction. The scope of a patent claim is generally determined by an interpretation of the significant risk factorslaw, the written disclosure in a patent, and we may not have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, somethe patent’s prosecution history. Our interpretation of these risksthe relevance or the scope of a patent or a pending application may be outsideincorrect or not accepted by a court of our controlcompetent jurisdiction. Our determination of the expiration date of any patent in the United States or abroad that we consider relevant may be incorrect or inaccurate. Our failure to identify and leave us with nocorrectly interpret relevant patents may negatively impact our ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impactdevelop and market NPMs.

In addition, there are several circumstances under which a target business with which we pursue a business combination. Additionally, very little public information generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
Our managementpatent application may not be ablepublished and accessible to maintain control of a target businessus or our licensors. For example, patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, but some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued. Publications in the scientific literature also often lag behind actual discoveries. Therefore, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications for technology covered by our initial business combination. Uponissued patents or our pending applications, or that we were the loss of control of a target business, new managementfirst to invent the technology. Our competitors may not possesshave filed, and may in the skills, qualificationsfuture file, patent applications covering NPMs or abilities necessarytechnology similar to profitably operateours without us knowing. Any such business.patent application may have priority over our patent applications or patents, which could require us to procure rights to issued patents covering such technologies in order to avoid infringement claims.
28



We may structurebe subject to claims of ownership and other rights to our initial business combination sopatents and other intellectual property by third parties.

Our confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and contractors generally provide that inventions conceived by the post-business combination company in which our public shareholders own shares will own less than 100% of the equity interests or assets of a

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

target business, but we will only complete such business combination if the post-business combination company owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interestparty in the target business sufficient forcourse of rendering services to us notwill be our exclusive intellectual property. While we require our employees, consultants, and contractors to be requiredassign such intellectual property to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any transaction that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post-business combination company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our shareholders prior to our initial business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-business combination company, depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the business combination. For example,event that the intellectual property is not automatically assigned (e.g., as work made for hire), those agreements may not be honored and obligations to assign intellectual property may be challenged or breached. Moreover, there may be some circumstances where we could pursueare unable to negotiate for such ownership rights and/or others misappropriate those rights in the process.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in our patents or other intellectual property as an owner, a transactionjoint owner, a licensee, an inventor or a co-inventor. In the latter two cases, the failure to name the proper inventors on a patent application can result in which we issue a substantial numberthe patents issuing thereon being unenforceable. Inventorship disputes may arise from conflicting views regarding the contributions of new Class A ordinary sharesdifferent individuals named as inventors, the effects of foreign laws where foreign nationals are involved in exchange for allthe development of the outstanding capital stock, sharessubject matter of the patent, conflicting obligations of third parties involved in developing our power modules or other equity interests of a target. In this case, we would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of questions regarding co-ownership of potential joint inventions. Litigation may be necessary to resolve these and other claims challenging inventorship and/or ownership. Alternatively, or additionally, we may enter into agreements to clarify the issuance of a substantial number of new Class A ordinary shares, our shareholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majorityscope of our outstanding Class A ordinary shares subsequentrights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to such transaction. In addition, other minority shareholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s shares than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that our management will not be able to maintain control of the target business.
We may seek business combination opportunities with a high degree of complexity that require significant operational improvements, which could delay or prevent us from achieving our desired results.
We may seek business combination opportunities with large, highly complex companies that we believe would benefit from operational improvements. While we intend to implement such improvements, to the extent that our efforts are delayed or we are unable to achieve the desired improvements, the business combination may not be as successful as we anticipate.
To the extent we complete our initial business combination with a large complex business or entity with a complex operating structure,paying monetary damages, we may also be affected by numerous risks inherent in the operationslose exclusive ownership of, the business with which we combine, which could delay or prevent us from implementing our strategy. Although our management team will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business and its operations, we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors until we complete our business combination. If we are not able to achieve our desired operational improvements, or the improvements take longer to implement than anticipated, we may not achieve the gains that we anticipate. Furthermore, some of these risks and complexities may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks and complexities will adversely impact a target business. Such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a smaller, less complex organization.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete our initial business combination with which a substantial majority of our shareholders do not agree.
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association does not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold, except that in no event will we redeem our public shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 (so that we do not then become subject to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules). As a result, we may be able to complete our initial business combination even though a substantial majority of our public shareholders do not agree with the transaction and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements to sell their shares to our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration we would be required to pay for all Class A ordinary shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, all Class A ordinary shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate business combination.
In order to effectuate an initial business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing instruments, including their warrant

49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial business combination that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a business combination, blank check companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, blank check companies have amended the definition of business combination, increased redemption thresholds, extended the time to consummate an initial business combination and, with respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. Amending our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association will require at least a special resolution of our shareholders as a matter of Cayman Islands law, meaning the approval of holders of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and amending our warrant agreement require a vote of holders of at least 65% of the public warrants and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the private placement warrants or any provision of the warrant agreement with respect to the private placement warrants, 65% of the number of the then outstanding private placement warrants. In addition, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association will require us to provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their public shares for cash if we propose an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combinationuse or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally change the nature of any of the securities offered through our Initial Public Offering, we would register, or seeklicense valuable intellectual property. Such an exemption from registration for, the affected securities.
The provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association that relate to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares (and corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of a special resolution which requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of some other blank check companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association to facilitate the completion of an initial business combination that some of our shareholders may not support.
Some other blank check companies have a provision in their charter which prohibits the amendment of certain of its provisions, including those which relate to the rights of a company’s shareholders, without approval by a certain percentage of the company’s public shareholders. In those companies, amendment of these provisions typically requires approval by between 90% and 100% of the company’s shareholders. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that any of its provisions related to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares (including the requirement to deposit proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of warrants into the trust account and not release such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to public shareholders as described herein) may be amended if approved by special resolution, meaning holders of at least two- thirds of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company, and corresponding provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by holders of at least 65% of our ordinary shares; provided that the provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association governing the appointment or removal of directors prior to our initial business combination may only be amended by a special resolution passed by not less than two-thirds of our ordinary shares who attend and vote at our general meeting which shall include the affirmative vote of a simple majority of our Class B ordinary shares. Our sponsor and its permitted transferees, if any, who collectively beneficially own, on an as-converted basis, 20% of our ordinary shares, will participate in any vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association which govern our pre-business combination behavior more easily than some other blank check companies, and

50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

this may increase our ability to complete a business combination with which you do not agree. Our shareholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association.
Our sponsor, executive officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to agreements with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our Initial Public Offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares, unless we provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A ordinary shares upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest and other income earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our income taxes, if any, divided by the number of the then-outstanding public shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our sponsor, executive officers and directors for any breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action, subject to applicable law.
We may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
Although we believe that the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants will be sufficient to allow us to complete our initial business combination, because we have not yet negotiated the acquisition of a target business we cannot ascertain the capital requirements for any particular transaction. If the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the private placement warrants prove to be insufficient, either because of the size of our initial business combination, the depletion of the available net proceeds in search of a target business, the obligation to redeem for cash a significant number of shares from shareholders who elect redemption in connection with our initial business combination or the terms of negotiated transactions to purchase shares in connection with our initial business combination, we may be required to seek additional financing or to abandon the proposed business combination. We cannot assure you that such financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. The current economic environment has made it especially difficult for companies to obtain acquisition financing. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed to complete our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. If we have not consummated our initial business combination within the required time period, our public shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our initial business combination, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financingoutcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
Regulatory Risk Factors

Our SDA applications may not be accepted for review or approved, and any rework necessary to address NRC concerns could significantly delay the continued development or growth of the target business. Nonecommercialization of our officers, directors or shareholders isproducts.

At the end of 2022, we submitted SDA applications to approve a VOYGR-6 plant design and to raise the licensed output of our NPM from 50 MWe to 77 MWe. The NRC has begun the acceptance review. If the NRC does not approve our applications, the rework required to provide any financing to us in connection with or afteraddress NRC concerns could substantially delay the commercialization of our initial business combination.products.
Our sponsor controls a substantial interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Our sponsor owns,design is only approved in the United States, and we must obtain approvals on an as-converteda country-by-country basis approximately 19.5%before we can sell our products abroad, which approvals may be delayed or denied or which may require modification to our design.

Our SMR design has not received regulatory approval in any country except the United States. Each country has its own safety approval that we must obtain before we can sell or install our NPMs abroad. Foreign approval processes may differ materially from the NRC process, and approvals may be denied or delayed in foreign countries, or some countries may require that we alter our design before obtaining approval. Denial or delay in approvals abroad could materially and adversely affect our business.

Our customers must obtain additional regulatory approvals before they construct power plants using our NPMs, and approvals may be denied or delayed.

The lead time to build a nuclear power facility is long and requires site licensing and approvals from applicable regulatory agencies before a plant can be constructed. The regulatory framework to obtain approvals is complex and varies from country to country. Any delays experienced by our customers in siting a power plant using our products and services could materially and adversely affect our business.

Our customers could incur substantial costs as a result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws.

The operations and properties of our issuedcustomers are subject to a variety of federal, state, local and outstanding ordinary shares. Accordingly,foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, management and disposal of hazardous, non-hazardous and radioactive materials and waste and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. Although NuScale’s business is to design and sell technology rather than to construct and own or operate power
29


plants, we must design our technology so it complies with such laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental requirements could require our customers to incur significant expenditures or result in significant restrictions on their operations, and the failure to comply with such laws and regulations, including failing to obtain any necessary permits, could result in substantial fines or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring our customers to conduct or fund remedial or corrective measures, install pollution control equipment or perform other actions. More vigorous enforcement by regulatory agencies, the future enactment of more stringent laws, regulations or permit requirements, including relating to climate change, or other unanticipated events may exertarise in the future and adversely impact the market for our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to stringent United States export and import control laws and regulations. Unfavorable changes in these laws and regulations or United States government licensing policies, our failure to secure timely United States government authorizations under these laws and regulations, or our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could have a substantial influencematerial adverse effect on actions requiringour business, financial condition and results of operations.

The inability to secure and maintain required export licenses or authorizations could negatively impact our ability to compete successfully or market our SMR technology for commercial applications outside the United States. For example, if we were unable to obtain or maintain our licenses to export certain nuclear hardware, we would be effectively prohibited from exporting our SMR technology in non-United States locations, which would limit the number of customers to those in the United States. In addition, if we were unable to obtain authorization to export our technology, hardware, code or technical assistance, we would experience a shareholder vote, potentially inlimited market for our technology, which would provide a manner that you do not support, including amendmentscompetitive edge to international suppliers of SMRs. In both cases, these restrictions could lead to an adverse impact on our ability to sell our commercial technology. Similarly, if we were unable to secure export authorization, we may need to implement design changes to our amendedNPM to address issues with our domestic supplier chain, which may increase costs or result in delays in delivery of new plants and restated memorandumsubsequent additional NPMs when ordered.

Failure to comply with export control laws and articlesregulations could expose us to civil or criminal penalties, fines, investigations, more onerous compliance requirements, loss of association. Ifexport privileges, debarment from government contracts or limitations on our sponsor purchasesability to enter into contracts with the United States government. In addition, any changes in export control regulations or United States government licensing policy, such as that necessary to implement United States government commitments to multilateral control regimes, may restrict our operations.

Our business is subject to a wide variety of extensive and evolving government laws and regulations. Changes in and/or failure to comply with such laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Regulatory risk factors associated with our business also include:
our ability to obtain additional applicable approvals, licenses or certifications from regulatory agencies, if required, and to maintain current approvals, licenses or certifications;
regulatory delays, delays imposed as a result of regulatory inspections, and changing regulatory requirements, may cause a delay in our ability to fulfill our existing or future orders, or cause planned plants to not be completed at all, many of which may be out of our securitiescontrol, including natural disasters, changes in governmental regulations or in the aftermarketstatus of our regulatory approvals or applications or other events that force us to cancel or reschedule plant construction, which could have an adverse impact on our business and financial condition; and
challenges as a result of regulatory processes or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase its control. NeitherNuScale’s ability to secure the necessary permissions to establish these plant sites could delay our sponsor nor,ability to achieve our
target build rate and could adversely affect our business.


51

General Risk Factors
TABLE OF CONTENTS

knowledge,COVID-19 and any future widespread public health crisis could negatively affect various aspects of our officers or directors, have any current intentionbusiness, make it more difficult for us to purchase additional securities, other than as disclosedmeet our obligations to our customers, and result in this Report. Factors that would be consideredreduced demand for our products and services.

In an effort to halt the outbreak of COVID-19, a number of countries, including the United States, previously placed significant restrictions on travel, many businesses announced extended closures, and many businesses and governmental agencies allowed employees to work remotely, which in making such additional purchases would include considerationsome cases may reduce the effectiveness of the current trading price of our Class A ordinary shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were elected by our sponsor, is divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term of three years with only one class of directors being elected in each year. We may not hold an annual meeting of shareholders to elect new directors prior to the completion of our initial business combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least the completion of the business combination.those employees. If there is an annual meeting, as a consequenceresurgence in COVID-19 cases, travel restrictions and business closures may in the future adversely affect our operations locally and worldwide, including our ability to obtain regulatory approvals and to manufacture, market, sell or distribute our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
30



Many of our “staggered” boardcustomers and suppliers worldwide were affected by COVID-19 and temporarily closed their facilities, which impacted the speed of directors, only a minorityour customer engagement and research and development. The impact of COVID-19 on NuScale’s operational and financial performance will depend on various future developments, including the duration and spread of the boardoutbreak and impact on regulatory agencies, customers, suppliers and employees, all of directorswhich remain uncertain at this time.

We are subject to cybersecurity risks.

Like other businesses, we face cybersecurity risks. Threat sources continue to seek to exploit potential vulnerabilities. These cyberattacks are becoming increasingly sophisticated and dynamic. We expect these cyberattacks to continue to occur in the future and we are constantly managing efforts to infiltrate and compromise our information technology systems and data.

A cybersecurity breach, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, malware, attacks by hackers, ransomware attacks, phishing attacks, supply chain attacks, breaches due to employee error or misconduct and other similar breaches, of our physical assets or information systems, or those of our vendors, business partners and interconnected entities or regulators could impact our operations or result in the theft or inappropriate release of certain types of information, including critical infrastructure information, sensitive customer, vendor and employee data, trading or other confidential data. The risk of these system-related events and cybersecurity breaches occurring continues to intensify, and while we have not directly experienced a material breach or disruption to our network or information systems or our operations to-date, such cyberattacks continue to increase in sophistication and frequency, and we may be unable to prevent all such cyberattacks in the future.

If a significant breach were to occur, our reputation could be negatively affected, customer confidence in us or others in the industry could be diminished, or we could be subject to legal claims, loss of revenues, increased costs or operations shutdown. Moreover, the amount and scope of insurance maintained against losses resulting from any such events or security breaches may not be sufficient to cover losses or otherwise adequately compensate for any disruptions to business that could result. Furthermore, in the future, such insurance may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

In addition, new or updated security regulations or unforeseen threat sources could require changes in current measures taken by us or our business operations and could adversely affect our consolidated financial statements.

Changes in tax laws or regulations may increase tax uncertainty and adversely affect results of our operations and our effective tax rate.

We will be considered for appointmentsubject to taxes in the United States and our sponsor, becausecertain foreign jurisdictions. Due to economic and political conditions, tax rates in and duties imposed by various jurisdictions, including the United States, may be subject to change. Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in the mix of its ownership position, will controlearnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in the outcome, as only holdersvaluation of our Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of directorsdeferred tax assets and to remove directors prior to our initial business combination. Accordingly, our sponsor will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our initial business combination.liabilities and changes in tax laws or their interpretation. In addition, we may be subject to income tax audits by various tax jurisdictions. An adverse resolution by one or more taxing authorities could have agreed nota material impact on our finances. Further, we may be unable to enter intoutilize any net operating losses in the event a definitive agreement regarding an initial business combination withoutchange in control is determined to have occurred.

We may become involved in litigation that may materially adversely affect us.

We are currently named in a purported class action lawsuit related to the prior consentTransaction (see “Legal Proceedings”) and
from time to time, we may become involved in various legal proceedings relating to matters incidental to the ordinary course of our sponsor.
We may amendbusiness, including intellectual property, commercial, product liability, employment, class action, whistleblower and other litigation and claims, and governmental and other regulatory investigations and proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert management’s attention and resources from the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then-outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the numberoperation of our Class A ordinary shares purchasable upon exercisebusiness and cause us to incur significant expenses or liability or require us to change our business practices. The existing class action lawsuit claims in part that NuScale LLC breached its prior LLC operating agreement or breached a duty of a warrant could be decreased, allgood faith and fair dealing in amending the LLC operating agreement in the Transaction without your approval.
Our warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended withoutobtaining the consent of any holder forformer common unit holders of NuScale LLC as a separate class. While we disagree with plaintiffs’ claims, the purposerisk of (i) curing any ambiguity or correct any mistake, includingloss if plaintiffs prevail could be material to conform the provisionsCompany. The existing class action lawsuit claims in part that the conversion of preferred units to common units, which occurred in conjunction with the merger, was inequitable to common unit holders. While we disagree with plaintiffs’ claims, the risk of loss if plaintiffs prevail would be material to the Company. Because of the warrant agreementpotential risks, expenses and uncertainties of litigation, we may, from time to time, settle disputes, even where we believe that we
31


have meritorious claims or defenses. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, we cannot assure you that the descriptionresults of any of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Shares of Class A Common Stock or Warrants

Our Organizational Documents designate the Court of Chancery of the termsState of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between NuScale Corp and its stockholders.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws (“Organizational Documents”) provide that the Court of Chancery of the warrantsState of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, another state or federal court located within the State of Delaware, shall be the exclusive forum for certain actions and the warrant agreement set forthclaims. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in this Report,a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with NuScale or defective provision (ii) amending the provisions relating to cash dividends on ordinary shares as contemplated by and in accordance with the warrant agreementany of its directors, officers or (iii) adding or changing any provisionsother employees, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to matterssuch claims. However, stockholders will not be deemed to have waived NuScale Corp’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder and this provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or questionsliability created by the Exchange Act, which provides for the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts with respect to all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, or the Securities Act. Further, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, the Organizational Documents provide that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the warrant agreementSecurities Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as the parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the rights of the registered holders of the warrants, provided that the approval by the holders of at least 65% of the then-outstanding public warrants is required to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the public warrants inwhether a manner adverse to a holder if holders of at least 65% of the then-outstanding public warrants approve ofcourt would enforce such amendment and, solelyprovision with respect to suits brought to enforce any amendmentduty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find the termschoice of forum provision contained in the private placement warrantsOrganizational Documents to be inapplicable or any provisionunenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of the warrant agreement with respect to the private placement warrants, 65% of the number of the then outstanding private placement warrants. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least 65% of the then-outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Class A ordinary shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.operations and financial condition.

Our warrant agreement will designatedesignates the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.

Our warrant agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the warrant agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of which is within the scope of the forum provisions of the warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.

This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our company, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our warrant agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.
We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at
The Warrants are accounted for as liabilities and the changes in value of the Warrants could have a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.material effect on our financial results.
We have the ability to redeem the outstanding public warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that the closing price of our Class A ordinary shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for adjustments to the number of shares issuable upon exercise or the exercise price of a warrant
32



The Warrants are currently classified as described under the heading “Description of Securities — Warrants — Public Shareholders’ Warrants — Anti-Dilution Adjustments”) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to proper notice of such redemption and provided that certain other conditions are met. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even ifliabilities. Under this accounting treatment, we are unablerequired to register or qualifymeasure the underlying securitiesfair value of the Warrants at the end of each reporting period and recognize changes in the fair value from the prior period in our operating results for sale under all applicable state securities laws.the current period. As a result we may redeem the warrants as set forth above even if the holders are otherwise unable to exercise the warrants. Redemption of the outstanding warrantsrecurring fair value measurement, our financial statements and results of operations may fluctuate quarterly based on factors which are outside our control. We expect that we will recognize non-cash gains or losses due to the quarterly fair valuation of the Warrants and that such gains or losses could force you to (i) exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) sell your warrants at the market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, we expect would be substantially less than the market value of your warrants.material.
In addition, we have the ability to redeem the outstanding public warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a
The price of $0.10 per warrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption provided that the closing price of our Class A ordinary shares equals or exceeds $10.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending on the third trading day prior to proper notice of such redemption and provided that certain other conditions are met, including that holders will be able to exercise their warrants prior to redemption for a number of Class A ordinarycommon stock and Warrants may be volatile.

The price of shares determined basedof Class A common stock and Warrants may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including:
changes in the industries in which we and our customers operate;
variations in its operating performance and the performance of our competitors in general;
material and adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic or other future pandemics on the redemption datemarkets and the fair market valuebroader global economy;
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results;
the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and its filings with the SEC;
our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;
additions and departures of key personnel;
changes in laws and regulations affecting its business;
commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
publication of research reports by securities analysts about us, our competitors or our industry;
sales of shares of Class A ordinary shares. The value received upon exercisecommon stock by our stockholders, including those who purchased shares of the warrants (1) may be less than the value the holders would have received if they had exercised their warrants at a later time where the underlying share price is higher and (2) may not compensate the holders for the value of the warrants, including because the number of ordinary shares received is capped at 0.361 Class A ordinary shares per warrant (subject to adjustment) irrespectivecommon stock in private placements in connection with the Merger; and
general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, foreign currency fluctuations, international tariffs, social, political and economic risks and acts of the remaining life of the warrants.war or terrorism.
None of the private placement warrants will be redeemable by us as (except as set forth under “Description of Securities — Warrants — Public Shareholders’ Warrants — Redemption of warrants when the price per Class A ordinary share equals or exceeds $10.00”) so long as they are held by our sponsor or its permitted transferees.
Our warrantsThese market and industry factors may have an adverse effect onmaterially reduce the market price of ourshares of Class A ordinary sharescommon stock and make it more difficult to effectuate our initial business combination.
We issued 11,500,000 warrants as part of the units offered by our Initial Public Offering and, simultaneously with the closingWarrants regardless of our Initial Public Offering, we issued in a private placement an aggregate
operating performance.


53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A significant portion of 8,900,000 private placement warrants, each exercisable to purchase oneour total outstanding shares may be sold into the market. This could cause the market price of shares of Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subjectcommon stock to adjustment. In addition,drop significantly, even if the sponsor, its affiliates or a member of our management team makes any working capital loans, it may convert up to $1,500,000 of such loans into up to an additional 1,000,000 private placement warrants, at the price of $1.00 per warrant. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares in connection with our redemption of our warrants.business is doing well.
To the extent we issue ordinary shares for any reason, including to effectuate a business combination, the potential for the issuance
Sales of a substantial number of additionalshares of Class A ordinarycommon stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of shares of Class A common stock.

As of February 28, 2023, there were (i) 69,878,067 shares of Class A common stock outstanding, (ii) 157,090,820 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exchange of NuScale LLC Class B units (together with cancellation of an equal number of shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock) pursuant to the procedures set forth in the A&R NuScale LLC Agreement, and (iii) 30,155,710 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options and Warrants.

We have registered on a Form S-1 the potential resale of 209,870,307 shares of Class A common stock that otherwise could be subject to resale restrictions. We also have registered on a Form S-8 an aggregate of 32,503,809 shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrantsoptions and other equity awards issued under the NuScale LLC Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan and the NuScale Corp 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The market price of shares of Class A common stock could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicledecline if the holders of shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to a target business. Such warrants, whensell them.

NuScale Warrants and Options will become exercisable for shares of Class A common stock, which, if exercised, willwould increase the number of issuedshares eligible for future resale in the public market and outstandingresult in dilution to our stockholders.

Outstanding Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 18,458,703 shares of Class A ordinary shares and reducecommon stock are exercisable in accordance with the valueterms of the Class A ordinary shares issued to complete the business transaction. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a business transaction or increase the cost of acquiring the target business.
Because each unit contains one-half of one redeemable warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other blank check companies.
Each unit contains one-half of one redeemable warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement no fractionalgoverning those securities. The exercise price of these warrants is $11.50 per share. In addition, outstanding options exercisable in exchange for an aggregate of 12,224,783 shares of Class A
33


common stock are or will become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of NuScale LLC. To the extent such warrants or options are exercised, additional shares of Class A common stock will be issued, upon separation of the units, and only whole unitswhich will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interestresult in a share, we will, upon exercise, round downdilution to the nearest whole number the numberholders of Class A ordinary shares to be issued to the warrant holder. This is different from other offerings similar to ours whose units include one ordinary sharecommon stock and one whole warrant to purchase one whole share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of a business combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-half ofincrease the number of shares compared to units that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one whole share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partnereligible for target businesses. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if a unit included a warrant to purchase one whole share.
A provision of our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.
Unlike many blank check companies, if (x) we issue additional Class A ordinary shares or equity- linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our initial business combination at an issue price or effective issue price of less than $9.20 per ordinary share (with such issue price or effective issue price to be determined in good faith by us and, (i)resale in the casepublic market. Sales of anysubstantial numbers of such issuance to our sponsorshares in the public market or its affiliates, without taking into account any founder shares held by our sponsor or such affiliates, as applicable, prior to such issuance, and (ii) to the extentfact that such issuance is made to Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. or its affiliates, without taking into account the transfer of founder shares or private placement warrants (including if such transfer is effectuated as a surrender to us and subsequent reissuance by us) by our sponsor in connection with such issuance) (the “Newly Issued Price”), (y) the aggregate gross proceeds from such issuances represent more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest thereon, available for the funding of our initial business combination on the date of the consummation of our initial business combination (net of redemptions), and (z) the volume weighted average trading price of our Class A ordinary shares during the 20 trading day period starting on the trading day prior to the day on which we consummate our initial business combination (such price, the “Market Value”) is below $9.20 per share, then the exercise price of the warrants willmay be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $18.00 per share redemption trigger prices described below under “Description of Securities — Warrants — Public Shareholders’ Warrants — Redemption of warrants when the price per Class A ordinary share equals or exceeds $18.00” and “Redemption of warrants when the price per Class A ordinary share equals or exceeds $10.00” will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $10.00 per share redemption trigger price described below under “Description of Securities — Warrants — Public Shareholders’ Warrants — Redemption of warrants when the price per Class A ordinary share equals or exceeds $10.00” will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price. This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination with a target business.

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weaknessexercised could continue to adversely affect our ability to report our resultsthe prevailing market prices of operations and financial condition accurately and in a timely manner.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our management is likewise required, on a quarterly basis, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and to disclose any changes and material weaknesses identified through such evaluation in those internal controls. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
As described elsewhere in this Report, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants we issued in connection with our initial public offering in November 2020. As a result of this material weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2020. This material weakness resulted in a material misstatement of our warrant liabilities, Class A common stock subject to possible redemption, change in fair value of warrant liabilities, additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit and related financial disclosures for the Affected Periods.stock.
To respond to this material weakness, we have devoted, and plan to continue to devote, significant effort and resources to the remediation and improvement of our internal control over financial reporting. While we have processes to identify and appropriately apply applicable accounting requirements, we plan to enhance these processes to better evaluate our research and understanding of the nuances of the complex accounting standards that apply to our financial statements. Our plans at this time include providing enhanced access to accounting literature, research materials and documents and increased communication among our personnel and third-party professionals with whom we consult regarding complex accounting applications. The elements of our remediation plan can only be accomplished over time, and we can offer no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects. For a discussion of management’s consideration of the material weakness identified related to our accounting for a significant and unusual transaction related to the warrants we issued in connection with the November 2020 Initial Public Offering, see “Note 2 — Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements” to the accompanying financial statements, as well as Part II, Item 9A: Controls and Procedures included in this Report.
Any failure to maintain such internal control could adversely impact ourInvestors’ ability to reportmake transactions in our financial positionsecurities could be limited and results from operationsif we cannot maintain our listing on a timely and accurate basis. If our financial statements are not accurate, investorsthe NYSE, we may not have a complete understanding of our operations. Likewise, if our financial statements are not filed on a timely basis, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities. In either case, there could result a material adverse effect on our business. Failure to timely file will cause us to be ineligible to utilize short form registration statements on Form S-3 or Form S-4, which may impair our ability to obtain capital in a timely fashion to execute our business strategies or issue shares to effect an acquisition. Ineffective internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on theadditional trading price of our stock.restrictions.
We can give no assurance that the measures we have taken and plan to take in the future will remediate the material weakness identified or that any additional material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our financial statements.
In accordance with updated guidance from the SEC on accounting treatment of the warrants, management determined that our warrants should be accounted for as liabilities rather than as equity and such requirement resulted in a restatement of our previously issued financial statements, which has resulted in unanticipated costs and diversion of management resources and may result in potential loss of investor confidence.
On April 12, 2021, the staff of the SEC issued a public statement entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies

55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(“SPACs”) (the “Statement”). In the Statement, the SEC staff expressed its view that certain terms and conditions common to SPAC warrants may require the warrants to be classified as liabilities on the SPAC’s balance sheet as opposed to equity. Since issuance, our warrants were accounted for as equity within our balance sheet, and after discussion and evaluation, including with our independent auditors, we have concluded that our warrants should be presented as liabilities with subsequent fair value remeasurement. Therefore we conducted a valuation of our warrants and restated our previously issued financial statements, which resulted in unanticipated costs and diversion of management resources and may result in potential loss of investor confidence. Although we have now completed the restatement, we cannot guarantee that we will have no further inquiries from the SEC or NYSE regarding our restated financial statements or matters relating thereto.
Any future inquiries from the SEC or NYSE as a result of the restatement of our historical financial statements will, regardless of the outcome, likely consume a significant amount of our resources in addition to those resources already consumed in connection with the restatement itself.
The restatement of our financial statements in May 2021 has subjected us to additional risks and uncertainties, including increased professional costs and the increased possibility of legal proceedings.
As a result of the restatement of our financial statements, we have become subject to additional risks and uncertainties, including, among others, increased professional fees and expenses and time commitment that may be required to address matters related to the restatements, and scrutiny of the SEC and other regulatory bodies which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and could subject us to civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation. We could face monetary judgments, penalties or other sanctions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause its stock price to decline.
Our warrants are accounted for as a warrant liability and are recorded at fair value upon issuance with changes in fair value each period reported in earnings, which may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock or may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.
Following the restatement of our historical financial statements, we account for 10,333,334 warrants issued in connection with our initial public offering (including the 6,666,667 warrants sold as part of the units in the initial public offering and the 3,666,667 private placement warrants) in accordance with the guidance contained in Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (ASC 815-40). Such guidance provides that because the warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment thereunder, each warrant must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, we classify each warrant as a liability at its fair value. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date. With each such remeasurement, the warrant liability will be adjusted to fair value, with the change in fair value recognized in our statement of operations and therefore our reported earnings. The impact of changes in fair value on earnings may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
A market for our securities may not develop, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.
The price of our securities may vary significantly due to one or more potential business combinations and general market or economic conditions, including as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak. Furthermore, anAn active trading market for our securities may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. YouIn addition, we may be unable to sell your securities unless a market can be established and sustained.
Because we must furnish our shareholders with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial business combination with some prospective target businesses.
The federal proxy rules require that a proxy statement with respect to a vote on a business combination meeting certain financial significance tests include historical and/or pro forma financial statement disclosure in periodic reports. We will include the same financial statements disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or be reconciled to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, or international financial reporting standards as issued by the

56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

International Accounting Standards Board, or IFRS, depending on the circumstances and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), or PCAOB. These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame.
We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to “emerging growth companies” or “smaller reporting companies,” this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our Class A ordinary shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of any fiscal year for so long as either (1) the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates does not equal or exceed $250.0 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues did not equal or exceed $100.0 million during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates did not equal or exceed $700.0 million as of the prior June 30th. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate a business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2021. Only in

57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a target business with which we seek to complete our initial business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition.
Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited.
We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors or officers.
Our corporate affairs and the rights of shareholders are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We are also subject to the federal securities laws of the United States. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative action in a Federal court of the United States.
We have been advised by Maples and Calder, our Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a United States company.
Provisions in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in the future for our Class A ordinary shares and could entrench management.
Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association will contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider to be in their best interests. These

58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

provisions will include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preference shares, and the fact that prior to the completion of our initial business combination only holders of our Class B ordinary shares, which have been issued to our sponsor, are entitled to vote on the appointment of directors, which may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
An investment in our equity securities may result in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences. For instance, because there are no authorities that directly address instruments similar to the units we issued in our Initial Public Offering, the allocation an investor makes with respect to the purchase price of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of warrants included in the units for federal income tax purposes. See the section titled “Taxation — Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” for a summary of the U.S. federal income tax considerations of an investment.
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences.
We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.
Since only holders of our founder shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of directors, uponmaintain the listing of our sharessecurities on the Nasdaq,NYSE in the Nasdaq may consider usfuture.

The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq rules and, as a result, we may qualify for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.
Only holders of“covered securities.” If our founder shares have the right to votesecurities were not listed on the appointment of directors. As a result, the Nasdaq may consider us to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq corporate governance standards. Under the Nasdaq corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the directors is held by an individual, groupNYSE or another company is a “controlled company”national securities exchange, such securities would not qualify as covered securities and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirements that:

we have a board that includes a majority of “independent directors,” as defined under the rules of the Nasdaq;

we have a compensation committee of our board that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities; and

we have a nominating and corporate governance committee of our board that is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.
We do not intend to utilize these exemptions and intend to comply with the corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq, subject to applicable phase-in rules. However, if we determine in the future to utilize some or all of these exemptions, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.
Risks Associated with Acquiring and Operating a Business in Foreign Countries
If we pursue a target company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we may face additional burdens in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing such initial business combination, and if we effect such initial business combination, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a target company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we would be subject to risks associated with cross-border business combinations,

59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

includingregulation in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our initial business combination, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments, regulators or agencies and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If we effect our initial business combination with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating in an international setting, including any of the following:
1.
costs and difficulties inherent in managing cross-border business operations;
2.
rules and regulations regarding currency redemption;
3.
complex withholding taxes on individuals;
4.
laws governing the manner in which future business combinations may be effected;
5.
exchange listing and/or delisting requirements;
6.
tariffs and trade barriers;
7.
regulations related to customs and import/export matters;
8.
local or regional economic policies and market conditions;
9.
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
10.
longer payment cycles;
11.
tax issues, such as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
12.
currency fluctuations and exchange controls;
13.
rates of inflation;
14.
challenges in collecting accounts receivable;
15.
cultural and language differences;
16.
employment regulations;
17.
underdeveloped or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
18.
corruption;
19.
protection of intellectual property;
20.
social unrest, crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
21.
regime changes and political upheaval;
22.
terrorist attacks, natural disasters and wars; and
23.
deterioration of political relations with the United States.
We may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such initial business combination, or, if we complete such combination, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our management following our initial business combination is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and resources becoming familiar with such laws, which could lead to various regulatory issues.
Following our initial business combination, our management may resign from their positions as officers or directors of the company and the management of the target business at the time of the business combination will remain in place. Management of the target business may not be familiar with United States

60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

securities laws. If new management is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and resources becoming familiar with such laws. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely affect our operations.
After our initial business combination, substantially all of our assets may be located in a foreign country and substantially all of our revenue may be derived from our operations in any such country. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects will be subject, to a significant extent, to the economic, political and social conditions and government policies, developments and conditions in the countryeach state in which we operate.offer our securities because states are not preempted from regulating the sale of securities that are not covered securities.
The economic, political
Reports published by analysts, including projections in those reports that differ from our actual results, could adversely affect the price and social conditions, as well as government policies,trading volume of our Class A common stock.

Securities research analysts may establish and publish their own periodic projections for NuScale. These projections may vary widely and may not accurately predict the results we actually achieve. Our share price may decline if our actual results do not match the projections of these securities research analysts. Similarly, if one or more of the country in whichanalysts who write reports on us downgrades our operations are locatedstock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our share price could affectdecline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, our business. Economic growthshare price or trading volume could be uneven, both geographicallydecline. Moreover, if no analysts commence coverage of us, the market price and among various sectors of the economy and such growth may not be sustained in the future. If in the future such country’s economy experiences a downturn or grows at a slower rate than expected, there may be less demandvolume for spending in certain industries. A decrease in demand for spending in certain industries could materially and adversely affect our ability to find an attractive target business with which to consummate our initial business combination and if we effect our initial business combination, the ability of that target business to become profitable.
Exchange rate fluctuations and currency policies may cause a target business’ ability to succeed in the international markets to be diminished.
In the event we acquire a non-U.S. target, all revenues and income would likely be received in a foreign currency, and the dollar equivalent of our net assets and distributions, if any,common shares could be adversely affected by reductions in the value of the local currency. The value of the currencies in our target regions fluctuate and are affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Any change in the relative value of such currency against our reporting currency may affect the attractiveness of any target business or, following consummation of our initial business combination, our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, if a currency appreciates in value against the dollar prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, the cost of a target business as measured in dollars will increase, which may make it less likely that we are able to consummate such transaction.affected.

We are subject to changing law and regulations regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased bothand will continue to increase our costs and the risk of non- compliance.non-compliance.

We are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including for example, the SEC, which are charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in, and are likely towill continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from seeking a business combination target.attention.

Moreover, because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.
ITEM
We may be subject to securities litigation, which is expensive and could divert management attention.

The market price of our Class A common stock may be volatile and, in the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our business.

Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
None.
ITEMItem 2.
Properties
PROPERTIES
34


Our executive offices are located at 2100 Mckinney Ave,6550 SW Redwood Ln, Suite 1675, Dallas, TX 75201,210, Portland, OR, 97224. In addition, we lease properties in the following locations:
Corvallis, OR. NuScale’s engineering and design center in Corvallis houses over 200 staff members, with capacity for 340, in approximately 60,000 square feet of office, computing, and storage space. Technical and related support activities such as engineering, design, operations, testing, code development, quality assurance, licensing and project management are performed at this facility. Our full-scale reactor control room simulator and computational computing cluster are also located at this facility. NuScale personnel use the computational cluster in a secure data center to perform structural, thermal hydraulic, fluid dynamics and neutronics calculations. We believe the location of our telephone number is (203) 856-1193.Corvallis facilities provides us with unique access to the technical expertise found in one of the largest nuclear engineering programs on the west coast.
Richland, WA. The costRichland office houses staff focused on operations, human factors, plant services and maintenance planning, with a functional limited-scale simulator that has communication capability with the Corvallis full-scale simulator.
Rockville, MD. The Rockville office has been a key enabler for our usethe NuScale strategy of early, frequent, and responsive interaction with the NRC.
These properties provide approximately 75,000 rentable square feet.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the regular course of business, we are involved in various legal proceedings and claims incidental to the normal course of business. Additionally, we are involved in various legal proceedings and claims relating to the Transaction. Management does not believe that resolution of any of these matters will materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On September 19, 2022, thirteen purported members of NuScale LLC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against NuScale LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Japan NuScale Innovation, Inc., and Sargent & Lundy Holdings, LLC. The plaintiffs purport to represent a class of individuals who held common units or options to purchase common units in NuScale LLC and seek declaratory relief and damages based on breach of contract and other common law claims. The claims are based on amendments to the operating agreement of NuScale LLC in connection with the Merger. Plaintiffs claim that such amendments required the consent of holders of common units in NuScale LLC voting as a separate class. NuScale LLC’s response to the complaint was filed on November 21, 2022. Plaintiffs’ reply was filed on January 17, 2023, and NuScale LLC filed reply to Plaintiffs’ response on February 14, 2023. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of this spacematter, we do not believe it is included in the $10,000 per month feeprobable that a loss will be incurred, and we will pay to an affiliatehave not recorded any liability as a result of our sponsorthese actions.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None
35


Part II
Item 5. Market for office space, utilities, secretarial supportRegistrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and administrative services. We consider our current office space adequate for our current operations.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
To the knowledge of our management, there is no litigation currently pending or contemplated against us, any of our officers or directors in their capacity as such or against any of our property.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.

62

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a)
Market Information

Our units, shares of Class A common stock and warrants are each tradedis listed on the NASDAQNYSE under the ticker symbol “SVSVU,” “SV” and “SVSVW” respectively. Our units commenced public trading on“SMR”.

As of March 1, 2023, we had 32,385 shareowners of record.

Performance Graph

The following graph shows changes over the period since the Transaction, May 2, 2022, through December 8, 2020. Our shares31, 2022, in the value of $100, invested in: (i) our Class A common stockshares; (ii) the Russell 3000 Index; (iii) the peer group, which consists of publicly-traded companies in the nuclear or energy transition industries comprised of Ballard Power Systems Inc., Bloom Energy Corporation, BWX Technologies, Inc., Cameco Corporation, Centrus Energy Corp., Enphase Energy, Inc., Enovix Corporation, FuelCell Energy, Inc., Plug Power Inc., SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. and warrants began separate trading on January 21, 2021.
(b)
Holders
On December 31, 2020, there was 1 holderVolta Inc.. The closing price of record for our units, 1 holder of record for our shares ofNuScale’s Class A common stock, 4 holdersshares as of recordDecember 30, 2022, the last trading day of our shares2022, was $10.26 on the NYSE.
smr-20221231_g3.jpg


Item 6. [Reserved]

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Class B common stockFinancial Condition and 2 holdersResults of record of our warrants.Operations
(c)
Dividends
We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock to date and do not intend to pay cash dividends prior to the completion of an initial business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial conditions subsequent to completion of an initial business combination. The payment of any cash dividends subsequent to an initial business combination will be within the discretion of our board of directors at such time. In addition, our board of directors is not currently contemplating and does not anticipate declaring any stock dividends in the foreseeable future. Further, if we incur any indebtedness, our ability to declare dividends may be limited by restrictive covenants we may agree to in connection therewith.
(d)
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
None.
(e)
Performance Graph
Not applicable.
(f)
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Offerings
Unregistered Sales and Use of Proceeds
On August 21, 2020, the sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share, to cover certain expenses on our behalf in consideration of 7,187,500 Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001. In September 2020, our sponsor transferred 40,000 Class B ordinary shares to each of our directors. Such securities were issued in connection with our organization pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. On October 22, 2020, our sponsor effected a surrender of 1,437,500 Class B ordinary shares to the company for no consideration, resulting in a decrease in the number of Class B ordinary shares outstanding from 7,187,500 to 5,750,000. The total number of Class B ordinary shares outstanding equals 20% of the total number of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares outstanding. The Class B ordinary shares will automatically convert into Class A ordinary shares concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our initial business combination, or earlier at the option of the holder thereof, on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment, as described in this Report.
Our sponsor is an accredited investor for purposes of Rule 501 of Regulation D. Each of the equity holders in our sponsor is an accredited investor under Rule 501 of Regulation D. The sole business of our sponsor is to act as the company’s sponsor in connection with our Initial Public Offering.
Our sponsor, pursuant to a written agreement, purchased an aggregate of 8,900,000 private placement warrants, each exercisable to purchase one ordinary share at $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment, at a price of  $1.00 per warrant ($8,900,000 in the aggregate), in a private placement that closed simultaneously

63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

with the closing of our Initial Public Offering. These issuances were made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid with respect to such sales.
(g)
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not applicable.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
References in this Report to “we,” “us” or the “Company” refer to Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. References to our “management” or our “management team” refer to our officers and directors, and references to the “Sponsor” refer to Spring Valley Acquisition Sponsor, LLC. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunctiontogether with theour financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 together with related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Report. Certain information contained in thethereto. This discussion and analysis set forth below includesmay contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
36


This Report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Exchange Act that are not historical facts, and involve risks and uncertainties that could causeOur actual results tomay differ materially from those expected and projected. All statements, other than statements of historical fact includedprojected in this Form 10-K/A including, without limitation, statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and the plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “seek” and variations and similar words and expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Suchthese forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance, but reflect management’s current beliefs, based on information currently available. A number of factors could cause actual events, performance or results to differ materially from the events, performance and results discussed in the forward-looking statements. For information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, please refer to the Risk Factors section of the Company’s final prospectus for its Initial Public Offering filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company’s securities filings can be accessed on the EDGAR section of the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Except as expressly required by applicable securities law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future eventsvarious factors. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this section to “NuScale,” “us,” “our” or otherwise.“we” refer to NuScale Power, LLC (“NuScale LLC”) prior to the Transaction, and to NuScale Power Corporation (“NuScale Corp”) following the consummation of the Transaction.
Overview
Our mission is to provide scalable advanced nuclear technology to produce electricity, heat and clean water to improve the quality of life for people around the world. We are changing the power that changes the world by creating an energy source that is smarter, cleaner, safer and cost competitive.
Our small modular reactor (“SMR”), known as NuScale Power Module (“NPM”), provides a scalable power plant solution incorporating enhanced safety, improved affordability and extended flexibility for diverse electrical and process heat applications. Our scalable design provides carbon-free energy at a reduced cost when compared with gigawatt-sized nuclear facilities.
Since our founding in 2007, we have made significant progress towards commercializing the first SMR in the United States. In 2017, we submitted our Design Certification Application (“DCA”) to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”). On August 28, 2020, the NRC issued its Final Safety Evaluation Report, representing the NRC’s completion of its technical review. On September 11, 2020 the NRC issued its Standard Design Approval (“SDA”) of our NPM and scalable plant design. With this Annual Reportphase of NuScale’s DCA now complete, customers may proceed with plans to develop NuScale power plants with the understanding that the NRC has approved the safety aspects of the NPM and plant design. We expect our operating losses and negative operating cash flow to grow until the commercialization of the NPM. On January 19, 2023, the NRC published in the Federal Register a final rule that certifies NuScale’s SMR design for use in the United States, which became effective 30 days after publication.
Merger Transaction
On December 13, 2021 we entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger (as amended, modified, supplemented or waived, the “Merger Agreement”), between Spring Valley Acquisition Corp., NuScale LLC and Spring Valley Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Spring Valley (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged into NuScale LLC (the “Merger”) with NuScale LLC surviving, Spring Valley Acquisition Corp was renamed NuScale Power Corporation, and NuScale LLC continued to be held as a wholly controlled subsidiary of NuScale Corp in an “Up-C” structure. On May 2, 2022, the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Merger (collectively the “Transaction”), was completed.

The Transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization as provided under GAAP. NuScale Corp is the acquired company, with NuScale LLC treated as the acquirer. This determination reflects that Legacy NuScale Equityholders held a majority of the voting power of NuScale Corp, that NuScale LLC’s pre-merger operations were the majority post-merger operations of NuScale Corp, and that NuScale LLC’s management team retaining similar roles at NuScale Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/AAccordingly, although NuScale Corp is the legal parent company, GAAP dictates that the financial statements of NuScale Corp represent a continuation of NuScale LLC’s operations, with the Transaction being treated as though NuScale LLC issued ownership interests for NuScale Corp, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of NuScale LLC are stated at historical cost, with no incremental goodwill or other intangible assets recorded for the fiscal year ended December 31,effects of the Merger with Spring Valley.

The following table provides the historical cost of the assets and liabilities assumed as a result of the Transaction:
Cash$341,462 
Warrant liabilities(47,532)
   Total net assets$293,930 
Key Factors Affecting Our Prospects and Future Results
We believe that our performance and future success depend on a number of factors that present significant opportunities for us but also pose risks and challenges, including competition from carbon-based and other non-carbon-based energy generators, the risk of perceived safety issues and their consequences for our reputation and the other factors discussed under the section titled “Risk Factors.” We believe the factors described below are key to our success.
37


Commencing and Expanding Commercial Launch Operations
In September 2020, we became the first and only company to receive NRC standard design approval for a small modular reactor. We believe our commercialization activities are restating periods beginningbeing completed at a pace that can support delivery of NPMs to a client site as early as 2028. We have an agreement in place with UAMPS to deploy a NuScale 6-module power plant at the DOE’s Idaho National Laboratory as part of UAMPS’ Carbon Free Power Project (“CFPP” or “the Project”). Commercial operation of the first NPM is slated for 2029. In December 2022, we signed a contract for Front-End Engineering and Design (“FEED”) work with RoPower Nuclear S.A, owned by S.N. Nuclearelectrica S.A. and Nova Power & Gas S.A., entities that operate under the authority of the Romanian Ministry of Energy, to advance the deployment of our NPMs to Romania. Under Phase 1 of the contract, we will define the major site and specific inputs for a VOYGR-6 SMR power plant to be deployed at the Doicesti Power Station site in Romania. We expect the site in Romania to use six modules and to be commercially operable as early as 2029.

We have over 120 potential target customers in addition to UAMPS and RoPower, as well as ten customers across seven countries that we consider highly interested customers who are considering an NPM power plant deployment in the late 2020s or early 2030s. We believe the long lead-time involved with siting an SMR, the number of customers in our pipeline and the work being performed by these potential customers involving a NuScale deployment project bode well for our potential future success. Further, in December 2022, we completed our Standard Plant Design (“SPD”), which provides potential customers with a generic VOYGR power plant design that will serve as a starting point for deploying site-specific designs, including supporting client licensing and deployment activities.
Regulatory Approvals

In December 2022, we applied to the NRC for an SDA for our latest power enhanced design that will be the heart of VOYGR-6 NuScale Plant. If approved, the licensed output of our NPM will be raised from 50 MWe to 77 MWe. A VOYGR-6 NuScale Plant referencing the SDA will be capable of generating 462 MWe (gross). Approval of the design, which could come in 2024, would increase the cost-competitiveness of our NPM, and we consider obtaining such approval a critical milestone.

Other factors that we believe are critical to our future success are country-level approvals of our NPM design. We also believe site-approvals by our customers to be key to facilitating broader adoption of our products and services. Obtaining these approvals before others is critical in maintaining our competitive advantage.
Successful Implementation of the First NPM Power Plant
A critical step in our success will be the successful construction and operation of the first power plant using our NPM. We expect that the first NPM for the UAMPS facility could be operational as early as 2029 with the periodremaining five modules achieving commercial operation in 2030.
Key Components of Results of Operations
We are an early-stage company and our historical results may not be indicative of our future results. Accordingly, the drivers of our future financial results, as well as the components of such results, may not be comparable to our historical or future results of operations.
Revenue
We have not generated any material revenue to date. All revenue that we have generated to date arises from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 throughengineering and licensing services provided to potential customers. As a result of those FEED services, we expect to generate a significant portion of our revenue from the year ended December 31, 2020 (collectively,sale of NPMs. We also expect to generate revenue by providing critical services, such as start-up and testing and nuclear fuel and refueling services, over the “Affected Periods”).life cycle of each power plant.
The restatement results from our prior accounting for our Public Warrants
38


Expenses
Research and Private Placement Warrants issuedDevelopment Expense
Our research and development (“R&D”) expenses consist primarily of internal and external expenses incurred in connection with our initial public offeringR&D activities. These expenses include labor directly performed on our projects and fees paid to third parties working on and testing specific aspects of our NPM design. R&D costs have been expensed as incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses
G&A expenses consist of compensation costs for personnel in November 2020 which hadexecutive, finance, accounting, human resources and other administrative functions. G&A expenses also include legal fees, professional fees paid for accounting, auditing, consulting services, insurance costs and facility costs.
Other Expense
Other operating expenses consist primarily of compensation costs (including indirect benefits and equity-based compensation expense) for operating personnel.
Department of Energy Cost Share
The DOE cost share amounts reflect our cost-sharing arrangement with the DOE. Generally, as our qualifying operating costs change, there is a corresponding change in the reimbursable amounts. The amount of any reimbursement is recognized in the period that we recognize the qualifying expenses.
Income Tax Effects
NuScale LLC was historically and remains a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes with each partner being separately taxed on its share of taxable income or loss. NuScale Corp is subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to its distributive share of any net taxable income or loss and any related tax credits of NuScale LLC.
Results of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)Twelve Months Ended December 31,
202220212020
Revenue11,804 $2,862 $600 
Cost of sales(7,317)(1,770)(355)
   Gross margin4,487 1,092 245 
Research and development expenses123,416 93,136 95,267 
General and administrative expenses63,057 45,226 37,176 
Other expenses48,009 37,030 26,645 
   Loss from operations(229,995)(174,300)(158,843)
Department of Energy cost share72,336 73,522 71,109 
Decrease (increase) in fair value of warrant liabilities12,148 — — 
Interest income and other cost share (interest expense)3,938 (1,715)(653)
   Loss before income taxes(141,573)$(102,493)$(88,387)
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021

Changes in Presentation

39


Prior year amounts totaling $1.5 million have been classifiedreclassified out of G&A expenses to other expenses to conform to the current year presentation on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenue

The increase in revenue was attributable to activities in support of the EPCDA for CFPP, as well as nuclear technologies consulting services.

R&D Expense
R&D expenses increased due to $25.9 million of professional fees associated with the standard plant design work and compensation costs of $3.8 million as a componentresult of equity on the premise that the instruments were indexedincreased headcount as we continue to expand our own stock and were eligible to be accounted for as equity instruments instead of classifying them as derivative liabilities.licensing efforts.
On April 12, 2021, the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC Staff”) issued a public statement entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”)” ​(the “Statement”). In the Statement, the SEC Staff expressed its view that certain terms and conditions common to SPAC warrants may require the warrants to be classified as liabilities on the SPAC’s financial statements as opposed to equity. Since issuance
G&A Expenses

64

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in November 2020, our warrants were accounted for as equity within our financial statements, and after discussion and evaluation, including with our independent auditors, we have concluded that our warrants should be presented as liabilities as of the IPO date reported at fair value with subsequent fair value remeasurement at each reporting period.
Therefore, the Company, in consultation with its Audit Committee, concluded that its previously issued Financial Statements for the periods beginning with the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 (collectively, the “Affected Periods”) should be restated because of a misapplication in the guidance around accounting for our outstanding warrants to purchase common stock (the “Warrants”) and should no longer be relied upon.
Historically, the Warrants were reflectedG&A expenses increased as a componentresult of equity$3.6 million in compensation costs due to an increase in headcount, $3.0 million in insurance costs, $3.4 million in equity-based compensation, higher software and hardware costs of $1.4 million and $5.7 million in marketing and advertising costs as opposedwe continue to liabilities onbuild brand recognition across the balance sheetsglobe.

Other Expense

Other expenses increased as a result of $6.3 million of higher compensation costs including a Transaction completion bonus, equity-based compensation of $2.4 million and higher travel expenses of $1.4 million.

Department of Energy cost share

While the statementscost share is similar to the prior year, it has decreased as a percentage of operations did not include the subsequent non-cash changestotal expenses due to more self-funded work associated with CFPP and higher G&A and Other expenses.

Increase (decrease) in estimated fair value of warrant liabilities

The price of the Warrants, based on our application of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging, Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815- 40). The views expressed inwhich is used to calculate their fair value, has dropped by approximately 32% since the Statement were not consistent with the Company’s historical interpretationTransaction.
Comparison of the specific provisions within its warrant agreementYears Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

R&D Expense

The decrease in R&D personnel costs was driven by the Company’s application of ASC 815-40 tofact that the warrant agreements. We reassessed our accounting for Warrants issued in November 2020, in lightNRC’s review of the SEC Staff’s published views. Based on this reassessment, we determined that the Warrants should be classified as liabilities measured at fair value upon issuance,NPM design application concluded in late 2020.

G&A Expenses

The increase in 2021 G&A expenses was primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits of $4.5 million, a contract settlement fee with subsequent changes in fair value reported in our Statementa former advisor of Operations each reporting period.$3.3 million and $2.2 million related to higher advertising costs, partially offset by lower equity-based compensation of $0.5 million.
Our accounting for the Warrants as components of equity instead of as derivative liabilities did not have any effect on our previously reported revenue,
Other Operating Expense

Other operating expenses operating income, cash flows from operations or cash.
In connection with the restatement, our management reassessed the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures for the periods affected by the restatement. Asincreased year over year as a result of that reassessment, we determined that its disclosure controlshigher compensation costs of $6.2 million, equity-based compensation of $3.2 million and procedures$0.5 million in various other expenses, partially offset by lower professional fees of $1.0 million.

40


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
We measure liquidity in terms of our ability to fund the cash requirements of our R&D activities and our near-term business operations, including our contractual obligations and other commitments. Our current liquidity needs primarily involve R&D activities for such periods were not effectivethe ongoing development of the NPM and associated plant design.
We had $217.7 million in cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020,2022, compared to $77.1 million as of December 31, 2021, as well as $50.0 million in short-term investments that will mature in the first quarter of 2023. We had no debt as of December 31, 2022, compared to $14.0 million as of December 31, 2021, (which was converted into equity in conjunction with respectthe Transaction). The Transaction resulted in NuScale receiving net cash in the amount of $341.5 million, consisting of $235.0 million in PIPE funding and $145.5 million in cash in trust, partially offset by transaction costs of $39.1 million.

Since NuScale’s inception, we have incurred significant operating losses; we have had negative operating cash flow during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 and 2021; and we have an accumulated deficit of $182.1 million as of December 31, 2022. Management expects that operating losses and negative cash flows may increase because of additional costs and expenses related to the classificationdevelopment of technology and the Company’s warrants as componentsdevelopment of equity instead of as derivative liabilities. For more information, see Item 9A included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.market and strategic relationships with other companies.
We
To date, we have not amended our previously filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods affected by the restatement. The financial information that has been previously filed or otherwise reported for these periods is superseded by the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such previously filed reports should no longer be relied upon.
The restatement is more fully described in Note 2 of the notes to the financial statements included herein.
Overview
We are a blank check company incorporated in the Cayman Islands on August 20, 2020 formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, amalgamation, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or other similar Business Combination with one or more businesses. We intend to effectuate our Business Combination using cash derived from the proceeds of the Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, our shares, debt or a combination of cash, shares and debt.
We expect to continue to incur significant costs in the pursuit of our acquisition plans. We cannot assure you that our plans to complete a Business Combination will be successful.
Results of Operations
We have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any operating revenues to date. Our only activities from the August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 were organizational activities and those necessary to prepare for the Initial Public Offering, described below.material revenue. We do not expect to generate any operating revenuesmeaningful revenue unless and until afterwe are able to commercialize our NPM and related services. We expect our costs to increase in connection with the advancement of our products and services toward commercialization. In addition, with the completion of our initial Business Combination. Wethe Transaction, we expect to generate non-operatingincur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. While we believe that the proceeds of the Transaction will be sufficient to reach commercialization of our NPM, certain costs are not reasonably estimable at this time, and we may require additional funding and our projections anticipate certain customer-sourced income that is not assured and DOE funds that are granted under the cooperative agreement secured by the Company are subject to Congressional appropriations.

We believe that based on our current level of operating expenses and currently available cash resources, we will have sufficient funds available to cover R&D activities and operating cash needs for the next twelve months. However, considering that we have not yet completed the development of a commercial product and have no meaningful revenue to date, we may require additional funds in future years. Our ability to raise funds through equity offerings may be limited by the significant number of shares that may be publicly sold, including the shares registered for resale under the registration statement on Form S-1 that was declared effective by the SEC on June 30, 2022. Such sales may negatively affect the market price of our shares of Class A common stock. In particular, a large sale by Fluor, our majority shareholder, could significantly affect our stock price. We believe the likelihood that Warrant holders will exercise their Warrants, and therefore the amount of cash proceeds that we would receive from such exercises, depends on the trading price of our shares of Class A common stock, which from time to time, has exceeded the $11.50 Warrant exercise price, before the Warrants expire. In certain circumstances, the Warrants can be exercised on a cashless basis. Our ability to fund R&D activities and our operating cash needs for multiple years does not depend on the proceeds we may receive as the result of exercises of Warrants.
Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and 2021
The following table sets forth the primary sources and uses of cash and cash equivalents for the periods presented below:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202220212020
Net cash used in operating activities$(148,609)$(99,162)(47,235)
Net cash used in investing activities(52,332)(1,952)(3,526)
Net cash provided by financing activities368,064 173,344 38,494 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$167,123 $72,230 $(12,267)
41


Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in our operating activities increased during 2022 due to a larger net loss, an increase in commercial work (which resulted in growth in receivables) and a larger prepaid asset associated with the D&O insurance required as a newly public company. In addition, the growth in payables and accruals slowed in 2022 due to less DOE cost-share work in the fourth quarter of the 2022 fiscal year. These changes were partially offset by the utilization of previously deferred DOE cost share during 2021.
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Investing cash flows generally reflect capital expenditures on computer equipment and software. However, in 2022, we invested $50.0 million in short-term investments.
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities
During 2022, the majority of the net cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the Transaction, with another $28.7 million received for the exercise of warrants and options. For the year ended December 31, 2021, our financing cash flows consisted of $192.5 million for the sale of convertible preferred units offset by the repayment of $20.0 million of debt to Fluor.
Comparison of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2021 and 2020

Cash Flows used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in our operating activities increased during 2021 due to a larger net loss, the utilization of $13 million of previously deferred DOE cost share and $20 million change in accounts receivable primarily related to a large $18 million DOE collection in 2020, partially offset by higher accruals associated with compensation and professional fees.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

In 2021, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of the sale of $192.5 million in convertible preferred units, partially offset by the repayment of $20 million in debt to Fluor.
In 2020, net cash provided by financing activities consisted of proceeds from the incurrence of debt of $20 million in the form of interest income on marketable securities held after the Initial

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Public Offering. We expect that we will incur increased expenses as a result of being a public company (for legal, financial reporting, accountingnote payable to Fluor and auditing compliance), as well as for due diligence expenses in connection with searching for, and completing, a Business Combination. Additionally, we recognize non-cash gains and losses within other income (expense) related to changes in recurring fair value measurement of our warrant liabilities at each reporting period.
For the periodproceeds from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, we had a net loss of $12,971,424, which consisted of formation and operating costs of $114,144, change in derivative of warrant liabilities of $12,110,000, including the loss on the sale of warrantsconvertible preferred units of $979,000,$18.5 million.
Commitments and offering costs of $749,253, partially offset by interest income on marketable securities held in the Trust Account of $1,973.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2020, we had $1,906,348 of cash held outside of the Trust Account, after payment of costs related to the Initial Public Offering, and available for working capital purposes. We intend to use the funds held outside the Trust Account primarily to identify and evaluate target businesses, perform business due diligence on prospective target businesses, travel to and from the offices, plants or similar locations of prospective target businesses or their representatives or owners, review corporate documents and material agreements of prospective target businesses, structure, negotiate and complete a Business Combination.
We intend to use substantially all of the funds held in the Trust Account, including any amounts representing interest earned on the Trust Account, which interest shall be net of taxes payable and excluding deferred underwriting commissions, to complete our Business Combination. We may withdraw interest from the Trust Account to pay taxes, if any. To the extent that our share capital or debt is used, in whole or in part, as consideration to complete a Business Combination, the remaining proceeds held in the Trust Account will be used as working capital to finance the operations of the target business or businesses, make other acquisitions and pursue our growth strategies.
Our liquidity needs have been satisfied prior to the completion of the Initial Public Offering through receipt of a $25,000 capital contribution from our Sponsor in exchange for the issuance of the Founder Shares to our Sponsor and the advancement of funds by our Sponsor to cover our expenses in connection with the Initial Public Offering. Subsequent to the consummation of the Initial Public Offering and Private Placement, our liquidity needs have been satisfied from the proceeds from the consummation of the Private Placement not held in the Trust Account. In order to fund working capital deficiencies or finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor or certain of our officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, loan us funds as may be required. If we complete a Business Combination, we may repay such loaned amounts out of the proceeds of the Trust Account released to us. In the event that a Business Combination does not close, we may use a portion of the working capital held outside the Trust Account to repay such loaned amounts, but no proceeds from our Trust Account would be used for such repayment. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants, at a price of $1.00 per warrant, at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants.
We do not believe we will need to raise additional funds in order to meet the expenditures required for operating our business. However, if our estimate of the costs of identifying a target business, undertaking in-depth due diligence and negotiating a Business Combination are less than the actual amount necessary to do so, we may have insufficient funds available to operate our business prior to our initial Business Combination. Moreover, we may need to obtain additional financing either to complete our Business Combination or because we become obligated to redeem a significant number of our public shares upon completion of our Business Combination, in which case we may issue additional securities or incur debt in connection with such Business Combination.
We continue to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and have concluded that the specific impact is not readily determinable as of the date of the balance sheet. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
We have no obligations, assets or liabilities, which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2020. We do not participate in transactions that create relationships with unconsolidated

66

TABLE OF CONTENTS

entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or purchased any non-financial assets.
Contractual Obligations
We do not have any long-term debt, capital lease obligations,material commitments and contractual obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In conjunction with DOE Office of Nuclear Energy Award DE-NE0008935 with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems’ (“UAMPS”) wholly owned subsidiary, Carbon Free Power Project, LLC (“CFPP LLC”), we entered into a Development Cost Reimbursement Agreement (“DCRA”), pursuant to which we are developing the NRC license application and performing other site licensing and development activities. Under the DCRA, we may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs up to a specified cap, which varies based on the stage of project development, if certain performance criteria are not met. As of March 7, 2023, when we entered into Amendment 3 of the DCRA and the Long Lead Material Reimbursement Agreement with CFPP LLC, the maximum reimbursement based on the current stage of project development is $81.0 million. As of December 31, 2022 the net development costs incurred by UAMPS totaled $17.8 million.

Under this agreement, the Company is required to have credit support to fund the amount of its potential reimbursement of these net development costs. This letter of credit is updated quarterly based on an agreed upon forecasted estimate of net development costs. A stipulation of attaining the letter of credit requires the Company segregate funds from the operating lease obligations or long-term liabilities, other thanbank accounts as collateral for said letter of credit. This account is identified as restricted cash in the amount of $26.5 million, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and acts as collateral for the $26.0 million letter of credit outstanding at December 31, 2022.

42


In December 2022, NuScale and Fluor provided CFPP LLC with a Class 3 Project Cost Estimate (“PCE”). As provided for in the DCRA (as amended), NuScale ran an agreementeconomic competitiveness test (“ECT”) comparing the PCE with a price target of $58.00/MWh for a target COD of the Project. The PCE exceeded the price target, meaning there was an ECT failure. As a result of the ECT failure UAMPS Members participating in the CFPP (“Project Participants”) were given the opportunity to exit the Project. CFPP LLC had until March 1, 2023 (unless extended by mutual agreement), to deliver notice that it intended to terminate its participation in the Project. If CFPP LLC had issued notice that it intended to terminate its participation in the Project by March 1, 2023, the Company would have been liable to pay an affiliateCFPP LLC approximately $17.8 million and would have had the option to take over the Project assets and continue to develop CFPP. However, on March 1, 2023, UAMPS notified NuScale that sufficient Project Participants have opted to continue with CFPP development notwithstanding the ECT failure. The next ECT is scheduled to be run in conjunction with the submission of the SponsorClass 2 PCE. For information regarding the consequences of an ECT failure, see Commercialization Risk Factors associated with the Company’s obligations to UAMPS.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparation of the financial statements requires our management to make a monthly feenumber of $10,000 for office space, utilitiesjudgments, estimates and secretarial and administrative support services providedassumptions relating to the Company.reported amount of expenses, assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We began incurringconsider an accounting judgment, estimate or assumption to be critical when (1) the estimate or assumption is complex in nature or requires a high degree of judgment and (2) the use of different judgments, estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 within our “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements”. Additional information about our critical accounting policies follows:
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable includes reimbursement requests outstanding from the DOE awards and are recognized as eligible costs are incurred. Such treatment creates symmetry with our incurrence of qualifying costs. In addition, we have commercial receivables associated with other federal projects that are billed as earned. We do assess the probability of collection from the DOE and our commercial customers in establishing the fair value of recorded amounts.
Revenue Recognition
In addition to advancing the commercialization of our SMR, we provide engineering services to customers.

We recognize fixed price contract revenue with multiple performance obligations as each obligation is completed. We allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. Revenue recognized on contracts that has not been billed to customers is classified as a current asset under accounts and other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. Amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized are classified as a current liability under deferred revenue on the consolidated balance sheet.

We recognize time and material contract revenue as incurred, while our cost plus fixed-fee contract revenue is recognized over time, matching continuous transfer of control to the customer. The Company accounts for these feescontracts as a single performance obligation and recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method, based primarily on November 23, 2020contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The percentage-of-completion method (an input method) is the most faithful depiction of the Company’s performance because it directly measures the value of the services transferred to the customer. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined as assessed at the contract level. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred unless they are expected to be recovered from the client.

Revenue recognition and profit is dependent upon a number of factors, including the accuracy of a variety of estimates made at the balance sheet date, such as engineering progress, material quantities, the achievement of milestones, penalty provisions, labor productivity and cost estimates. Variable consideration is included in the estimate of transaction price only to the extent that a significant reversal would not be probable. We continuously monitor factors that may affect the quality of our estimates, and material changes in estimates are disclosed accordingly.

We exclude all taxes assessed by governmental authorities from our measurement of transaction prices that are both
(i) imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and (ii) collected from customers. Accordingly, such tax amounts are not included as a component of revenue or cost of sales.
43



We generally provide limited warranties for work performed under our engineering contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of our work.

Because our SMR is designed to be sold on a modular basis, we are limited under GAAP in our ability to recognize revenue on a POC basis. Other companies with a less-standardized approach might be able to use POC, which would have the effect of accelerating their recognition of profit ahead of us, given our use of completed contract accounting.
Equity-Based Compensation
Equity-based compensation is measured using a fair value-based method for all equity-based awards. The cost of awarded equity instruments is recognized based on each instrument’s grant-date fair value over the period during which the grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The determination of fair value requires significant judgment and the use of estimates, particularly with regard to Black-Scholes assumptions such as stock price volatility and expected option lives to value equity-based compensation. Equity-based compensation is recorded as a G&A expense and other expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
We measure the fair value of each option grant at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. In this model we use the treasury yield curve rates for the risk-free interest rate for a period equal to the expected option life and the simplified method to calculate the expected option life (options qualified as ‘plain vanilla’ under the provisions of SAB 107). Volatility is determined by reference to the actual volatility of several publicly traded companies that are similar to NuScale in its industry sector. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. All equity-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards.

There is substantial judgment in selecting the assumptions which we use to determine the fair value of such equity awards and other companies could use similar market inputs and experience and arrive at different conclusions with respect to those used to calculate fair value. Using alternative assumptions could cause there to be differences in the resulting fair value. If the fair value were to increase, the amount of expense that would result would also increase. Conversely, if the fair value were to decrease, the amount of expense would decrease.
Emerging Growth Company Accounting Election
Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts EGCs from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect not to take advantage of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-EGCs, and any such election to not take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable. We expect to be an EGC at least through the end of 2023 and will continue to incur these fees monthly untilhave the earlierbenefit of the completionextended transition period. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 3 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for a Business Combinationsummary of recently adopted and recently issued accounting standards and their related effects or anticipated effects on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Inflation Risk

Inflation has materially impacted the overall global economy, including all energy projects and NuScale VOYGR™ projects, resulting in higher supply chain costs and operating expenses.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our Consolidated Financial Statements required by this Item are set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

44


None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Exchange Act, our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures should be designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on their evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2022.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the Company’s liquidation.
The underwriter is entitledpreparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with GAAP. Because of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to a deferred fee of $0.35 per Unit, or $8,050,000 in the aggregate. The deferred fee will become payable to the underwriter from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event that we complete a Business Combination,future periods are subject to the termsrisk that controls may become inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This annual report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm, regarding internal controls over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting was not subject to such attestation as we are an “emerging growth company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations of the underwriting agreement.Effectiveness of Control

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
Item 9B. Other Information

None
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions That Prevent Inspections

None
45


Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, except that: the information regarding our executive officers required by Item 401 of Regulation S-K is set forth herein at Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-K under the heading “Information about our Executive Officers.”

Code of Business Conduct

We have a code of business conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. A copy of the code of conduct is available on our website at www.nuscalepower.com. The code of business conduct is a “code of ethics,” as defined in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K. Our Internet website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. We will make any legally required disclosures regarding amendments to, or waivers of, provisions of its code of ethics on our website. Information contained on or accessible through our website is not a part of this proxy statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owner and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
46


Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1) Financial Statements: The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed on the index to financial statements on page F-1.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable, not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or the required information is otherwise included.
(a)(3) Exhibits: The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index are included or incorporated by reference in this report.

(a) Exhibits.

Exhibit NumberDescription
2.1†
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
10.1
10.2+
10.3
10.4
10.5
47


10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9+
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13+
10.14+
10.15+
10.16+
10.17†
10.18+
10.19+
10.20
10.21
48


10.22+
10.23+
10.24+
10.25
10.26
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL).


Schedules and exhibits to this Exhibit omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(2). The Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the SEC upon request.

+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary

None
49


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NuScale Power Corporation
DateBy:/s/ John Hopkins
March 15, 2023Name:John Hopkins
Title:Chief Executive Officer
DateBy:/s/ Chris Colbert
March 15, 2023Name:Chris Colbert
Title:Chief Financial Officer


































50



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAMEPOSITIONDATE
/s/ James T. HacketChairman and DirectorMarch 15, 2023
James T. Hackett
/s/ John Hopkins
Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
March 15, 2023
John Hopkins
/s/Chris Colbert
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
March 15, 2023
Chris Colbert
/s/Alan L. BoeckmannDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Alan L. Boeckmann
/s/ Alvin C. Collins, IIIDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Alvin C. Collins, III
/s/ Kent KresaDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Kent Kresa
/s/ Christopher J. PanichiDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Christopher J. Panichi
/s/ Christopher SorrellsDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Christopher Sorrells
/s/ Kimberly O. WarnicaDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Kimberly O. Warnica
/s/ Bum Jin ChungDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Bum Jin Chung
/s/ Shinji FujinoDirectorMarch 15, 2023
Shinji Fujino
51




F-1


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of NuScale Power corporation:

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NuScale Power Corporation (the Company) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a registrationpublic accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and shareholdersare required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.
Portland, Oregon
March 15, 2023
F-2


NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents$217,685 $77,094 
Short-term investments50,000 — 
Prepaid expenses5,531 4,147 
Accounts and other receivables11,199 4,833 
   Total current assets284,415 86,074 
Property, plant and equipment, net4,770 4,960 
In-process research and development16,900 16,900 
Intangible assets, net1,059 1,236 
Goodwill8,255 8,255 
Restricted cash26,532 — 
Other assets6,704 3,772 
   Total assets$348,635 $121,197 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$27,951 $22,375 
Accrued compensation9,038 10,552 
Convertible note payable— 14,041 
Other accrued liabilities1,568 1,440 
   Total current liabilities38,557 48,408 
Warrant liabilities29,349 — 
Noncurrent liabilities2,786 2,976 
Deferred revenue856 1,415 
   Total liabilities71,548 52,799 
   Mezzanine equity— 2,140 
Stockholders' Equity
Convertible preferred units— 819,694 
Common units— 28,184 
Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 332,000,000 shares authorized, 69,353,019 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2022— 
Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, 179,000,000 shares authorized, 157,090,820 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 202216 — 
Additional paid-in capital296,748 0
Accumulated deficit(182,092)(781,620)
   Total Stockholders' Equity Excluding Noncontrolling Interests114,679 66,258 
Noncontrolling interests162,408 — 
   Total Stockholders' Equity$277,087 $66,258 
   Total Liabilities, Mezzanine Equity and Stockholders' Equity$348,635 $121,197 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3


NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)202220212020
Revenue$11,804 $2,862 $600 
Cost of sales(7,317)(1,770)(355)
   Gross margin4,487 1,092 245 
Research and development expenses123,416 93,136 95,267 
General and administrative expenses63,057 45,226 37,176 
Other expenses48,009 37,030 26,645 
   Loss from operations(229,995)(174,300)(158,843)
Department of Energy cost share72,336 73,522 71,109 
Decrease (increase) in fair value of warrant liabilities12,148 — — 
Interest income and other cost share (interest expense)3,938 (1,715)(653)
   Loss before income taxes(141,573)(102,493)(88,387)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes— — — 
   Net loss(141,573)(102,493)(88,387)
Net loss attributable to legacy NuScale LLC holders prior to Transaction(31,155)— — 
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests(84,504)— — 
Net Loss Attributable to Class A Common Stockholders(25,914)(102,493)(88,387)
Loss Per Share of Class A Common Stock:
Basic and Diluted$(0.51)$— $— 
Weighted-Average Shares of Class A Common Stock Outstanding:
Basic and Diluted50,763,844 — — 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


F-4


NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)202220212020
OPERATING CASH FLOW
Net loss$(141,573)$(102,493)$(88,387)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to operating cash flow:
  Depreciation2,521 2,018 1,900 
  Amortization of intangibles177 177 178 
  Equity-based compensation expense9,331 6,441 3,718 
  Accrued interest on convertible note payable— 127 701 
  Change in fair value of warrant liabilities(12,148)— — 
  Net noncash change in right of use assets and lease liabilities2,385 1,501 1,486 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
  Prepaid expenses and other assets(2,243)(1,540)(462)
  Accounts receivable(6,366)(2,043)18,042 
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses2,987 5,886 6,493 
  Lease liability(1,504)(1,650)(1,594)
  Deferred DOE cost share(104)(13,254)13,358 
  Deferred revenue(559)1,148 224 
  Accrued compensation(1,513)4,520 (2,892)
Net cash used in operating activities(148,609)(99,162)(47,235)
INVESTING CASH FLOW
  Purchase of short-term investments(50,000)— — 
  Purchases of property, plant and equipment(2,332)(1,952)(3,526)
Net cash used in investing activities(52,332)(1,952)(3,526)
FINANCING CASH FLOW
  Proceeds from Transaction, net341,462 — — 
  Payments of Transaction costs(2,401)— — 
  Proceeds from debt issuance— — 23,000 
  Repayment of debt— (20,000)(3,000)
  Proceeds from short-term borrowings— 27,200 — 
  Repayment of short-term borrowings— (27,200)— 
  Proceeds from sale of convertible preferred units— 192,500 18,500 
  Proceeds from exercise of common unit options847 748 43 
  Repurchase of common units(566)(17)(49)
  Issuance of treasury units20 113 — 
  Proceeds from exercise of warrants and common share options28,702 — — 
Net cash provided by financing activities368,064 173,344 38,494 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash167,123 72,230 (12,267)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:
Beginning of period77,094 4,864 17,131 
End of period$244,217 $77,094 $4,864 
Summary of noncash investing and financing activities:
Assumption of Transaction warrant liabilities$47,532 $— $— 
Debt converted to equity14,181 — — 
Conversion of equity options to liability award50 — — 
Conversion of accounts payable to convertible preferred units— 65 378 
Warrants converted into equity6,268 — — 
Equity issuance fees— 1,960 1,960 
Capital expenditures in accounts payable— — 290 
Increase in lease liability— — 846
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest$— $1,478 $— 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5


NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

Members’ Equity
Mezzanine EquityConvertible
Preferred
Units
Common
Units
Accumulated
Deficit
Total
Member’s
Equity
UnitsAmountUnitsAmountUnitsAmount
Balances at December 31, 20196,000 $2,140 532,888 $610,211 5,442 $17,187 $(590,740)$36,658 
Sale of convertible preferred units— — 9,635 18,500 — — — 18,500 
Issuance of convertible preferred units— — 206 378 — — — 378 
Exercise of common unit options— — — — 105 43 — 43 
Repurchase of common units— — — — (55)(49)— (49)
Issuance of treasury units— — — — — — — — 
Equity-based compensation expense— — — — — 3,718 — 3,718 
Net loss— — — — — — (88,387)(88,387)
Balances at December 31, 20206,000 $2,140 542,729 $629,089 5,492 $20,899 $(679,127)$(29,139)
Sale of convertible preferred units— — 90,500 190,540 — — — 190,540 
Issuance of convertible preferred units— — 32 65 — — — 65 
Exercise of common unit options— — — — 3,483 748 — 748 
Repurchase of common units— — — — (15)(17)— (17)
Issuance of treasury units— — — — 114 113 — 113 
Equity-based compensation expense— — — — — 6,441 — 6,441 
Net loss— — — — — — (102,493)(102,493)
Balances at December 31, 20216,000 $2,140 633,261 $819,694 9,074 $28,184 $(781,620)$66,258 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.









F-6


NuScale Power Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(in thousands)Common Stock
Mezzanine EquityConvertible Preferred UnitsCommon UnitsClass AClass BAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated DeficitNoncontrolling InterestsTotal Stockholders' Equity
UnitsAmountUnitsAmountUnitsAmountSharesAmountSharesAmount
Balances at December 31, 20216,000 $2,140 633,261 $819,694 9,074 $28,184 — $— — $— $— $(781,620)$— $66,258 
Sale of convertible preferred units— — — — — — — — — — — — — — 
Issuance of convertible preferred units— — — — — — — — — — — — — — 
Exercise of common unit options— — — — 3,764 847 — — — — — — — 847 
Repurchase of common units— — — — (358)(566)— — — — — — — (566)
Issuance of treasury units— — — — 12 20 — — — — — — — 20 
Conversion of equity award to liability award— — — — — (50)— — — — — — — (50)
Equity-based compensation expense— — — — — 1,359 — — — 7,972 — — 9,331 
Reverse recapitalization, net(6,000)(2,140)(633,261)(819,694)(12,492)(29,794)41,971 178,397 18 220,606 656,597 280,113 307,850 
Exercise of common share options and warrants— — — — — — 4,432 — — 34,969 — — 34,970 
Issuance of earn-out shares upon triggering event— — — — — — 1,644 — — — — — — — 
Conversion of combined interest into Class A shares— — — — — — 21,306 (21,306)(2)— — — — 
Rebalancing of ownership percentage for conversion of combined interest into Class A shares— — — — — — — — — — 33,201 — (33,201)— 
Net loss attributable to legacy NuScale prior to Transaction— — — — — — — — — — — (31,155)— (31,155)
Net loss after the Transaction— — — — — — — — — — — (25,914)(84,504)(110,418)
Balances at December 31, 2022— $— — $— — $— 69,353 $157,091 $16 $296,748 $(182,092)$162,408 $277,087 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
1.The Company
Organization
NuScale Corp (“NuScale” or the “Company”) is incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware. The Company is the primary beneficiary of NuScale LLC, a variable interest entity, and all activity of NuScale LLC and the Company are consolidated herein. NuScale LLC is a limited liability company organized in the State of Oregon in 2011. The Company is majority owned by Fluor Enterprises, Inc., a subsidiary of Fluor.
Operations
The Company is commercializing a modular, scalable 77 megawatt (gross) electric Light Water Reactor nuclear power plant using exclusive rights agreementto a nuclear power plant design obtained from Oregon State University. The Company also uses the test facility at OSU through a technology transfer agreement. The following represents key milestones in the development of this technology:
December 2016: DCA completed
January 2017: DCA submitted to the NRC
March 2017: DCA accepted for review by the NRC
August 2020: NRC issued the Final Safety Evaluation Report ("FSER")
The FSER represents the NRC’s completion of its technical review and approval of the NuScale SMR design. With this final phase of NuScale’s DCA now complete, customers may proceed with plans to develop NuScale power plants with the understanding that the NRC has approved the safety aspects of the NuScale design.
All the Company’s operations and long-lived assets were attributable to operations in the United States as of and for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
U.S. Department of Energy Funding
Beginning in 2014, the U.S. DOE has provided critical funding to NuScale through a series of cooperative agreements which support ongoing commercialization activities. The agreements which were active during 2022, 2021 and 2020 are discussed below.
U.S. Department of Energy NuScale SMR FOAK Nuclear Demonstration Readiness Project Completion (Award 8928)
In February 2020, the Company was awarded up to $350,000 under “SMR FOAK Nuclear Demonstration Readiness Project Completion” (“Award 8928”). This program is expected to complete all remaining licensing activities, first-of-a-kind engineering, supply chain development, testing and other required activities to have the NuScale SMR ready to enable timely client project deployment. The award consisted of NuScale cost share of $350,000 (50%) and the government cost share of $350,000 (50%). NuScale was permitted to request reimbursement of 73% of its program costs from August 2019 through September 2020. Because the government’s cost share of total program funds must be no more than 50% over the duration of the 5 years award, 23% of the reimbursement requests made for the August 2019 through September 2020 costs were deferred and recognized as a liability in the accompanying balance sheet. At December 31, 2021, $10,237 of deferred DOE cost share is netted in related DOE accounts receivable due to a right of offset. No amounts were eligible to be offset at December 31, 2022. These deferred reimbursement costs were recognized as reimbursement requests were made at less than 50%. The DOE obligated a total of $233,000 to date, of which $225,000 was collected, through December 31, 2022.
U.S. Department of Energy Carbon Free Power Project Award (Award 8369)
In April 2015, the Company was awarded an Assistance Agreement, “Site Permitting and Licensing of the NuScale Small Modular Reactor”. Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems was identified as a sub-recipient under the Carbon Free Power Project (“CFPP”) award. UAMPS is considering developing, constructing and owning a 462 MWe (gross) nuclear powered energy center using NuScale’s SMR technology. The CFPP award consisted of DOE cost share of $16,617 (50%)
F-8


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
and NuScale and UAMPS cost share of $16,617 (50%) to facilitate site permitting and related licensing activities. In January 2019 the DOE renewed the award extending the period of performance through December 2023 and increasing the total amount of the award to $126,694. The cost sharing percentages remained at DOE cost share of 50% and NuScale and UAMPS cost share of 50% of the total award. This award was later amended to consist of DOE cost share of $8,250 (50%) and NuScale and UAMPS cost share of $8,250 (50%). Cumulative cash received through December 31, 2021 was $7,451, with an additional $70 obligated and included in accounts receivable. The remaining $729 was paid by the DOE to a third party, in accordance with the Award, for services provided. The period of performance under this award ended October 31, 2021 due to UAMPS applying as prime recipient for Award 8935. NuScale has no cost share under Award 8935.

Subsequently, an “Agreement for a Cost Sharing Option Associated with the Siting and Licensing of a Small Modular Reactor” and a “Subaward Agreement between the Company and UAMPS” were executed in December 2015. These agreements were subsequently amended various times. Under these amended agreements, NuScale will reimburse UAMPS 25% of the UAMPS project costs associated with the CFPP award up to a maximum of $4,100.

Under the amended agreements, when UAMPS submits the combined construction and operating license application, it will pay NuScale an amount equal to the sum of all CFPP project costs reimbursed by NuScale. Upon such payment, UAMPS will assume full ownership interest in all project assets free of any claim by NuScale.
As described more thoroughly in note 16, we entered into on November 23, 2020,a DCRA with Carbon Free Power Project, LLC (“CFPP LLC”). Under the holdersDCRA, we may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs. As of December 31, 2022 the net development costs incurred by UAMPS totaled $17,834. Further the DCRA requires we have credit support for these costs, resulting in NuScale obtaining a letter of credit in the amount of $26,000.
2.Merger Transaction
Merger with Spring Valley

In December 2021, NuScale LLC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (“Spring Valley”) and Spring Valley Merger Sub, LLC (“Merger Sub”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Spring Valley. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into NuScale LLC (the “Merger”), with NuScale LLC surviving the Merger, Spring Valley being renamed NuScale Corp, and NuScale LLC continuing to be held as a wholly controlled subsidiary of NuScale Power Corporation in an “Up-C” structure. On May 2, 2022, the Merger Agreement and Merger (collectively the “Transaction”) was completed.

The Transaction is shown as a reverse recapitalization under GAAP. Spring Valley is the acquired company, with NuScale LLC treated as the acquirer. This determination reflects Legacy NuScale Equityholders holding a majority of the Founder Shares,voting power of NuScale Corp, NuScale LLC’s pre-merger operations being the majority post-merger operations of NuScale Corp and NuScale LLC’s management team retaining similar roles at NuScale Corp. Accordingly, although Spring Valley is the legal parent company, GAAP dictates that the financial statements of NuScale Corp will represent a continuation of NuScale LLC’s operations, with the Transaction being treated as though NuScale LLC issued ownership interests for Spring Valley, accompanied by a recapitalization. The net assets of NuScale LLC are stated at historical cost, with no incremental goodwill or other intangible assets recorded for the effects of the Transaction with Spring Valley.

The following table provides the historical cost of the assets and liabilities assumed as a result of the Transaction:

Cash$341,462 
Warrant liabilities(47,532)
Total net assets$293,930 

In connection with the Transaction:
Each Convertible Preferred Unit of NuScale LLC was converted into common units using an exchange ratio, and each NuScale LLC common unit holder received a certain number of NuScale LLC Class B units and non-economic voting
F-9


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock based on an exchange ratio. Holders of NuScale LLC Class B units have the right to exchange each Class B unit, together with the cancellation for no consideration of one share of NuScale Corp Class B common stock, par value $0.0001, for one share of NuScale Corp Class A common stock, par value $0.0001, or cash, subject to certain restrictions.
Institutional and accredited investors purchased 23,700,002 shares of Class A common stock for an aggregate amount of $235,000.
The convertible loan held by Fluor, identified in the December 31, 2021 balance sheet as convertible note payable, was converted into 8,257,560 NuScale LLC Class B units in April 2022 (which then received NuScale LLC Class B units and non-economic voting shares of Class B common stock).

The Transaction resulted in NuScale LLC receiving cash in the amount of $341,462, consisting of $235,000 through the private sale of equity securities (“PIPE”) and $145,525 in cash in trust, partially offset by transaction costs of $39,063.

The following summarizes the common stock outstanding immediately following the Transaction, on May 3, 2022:

Shares%
Spring Valley Class A Shareholders14,400,3696.5 %
Spring Valley Founders (A)
3,871,0091.8 %
Total Spring Valley18,271,3788.3 %
Legacy NuScale Equityholders178,396,71181.0 %
PIPE Shares23,700,00210.8 %
Total Shares at Closing (excluding shares below)220,368,091100.0 %
Remaining NuScale Consideration Shares - upon Exercise of NuScale Corp Options14,742,933
Other - Earn Out Shares (B)
1,643,924
Total Shares236,754,948
(A) Includes an aggregate of 120,000 Spring Valley Class B ordinary shares that were issued to Spring Valley’s independent directors.
(B) Spring Valley Founders Shares includes “Earn Out Shares”. Fifty percent of the Earn Out Shares vest, pursuant to the sponsor letter agreement, dated as of December 31, 2021, between SV Acquisition Sponsor Sub, LLC, Spring Valley and NuScale LLC, if NuScale Corp trades at $12.00 per share or higher over any 20 trading days within a 30-day window during the 60 months following the closing and the dollar volume-weighted average price (“VWAP”) is greater than or equal to $12.00 per share. The remainder of the Earn Out Shares vest if NuScale Corp trades at $14.00 per share or higher over any 20 trading days within a 30-day window during the 60 months following the closing and the VWAP is greater than or equal to $14.00 per share. The Earn Out Shares associated with the merger became vested during 2022, as the VWAP of the Company’s share price exceeded $12.00 and then $14.00 for the required time period.
Warrants

The Private Placement Warrants and the Public Warrants (collectively the “Warrants”) are included on the balance sheet as Warrant liabilities. We are required to measure the fair value of the Warrants at the end of each reporting period. The rights of Warrant holders are described in note 5 and the valuation methodology for the Warrants is described in note 6.

Tax Receivable Agreement

Substantially all of the assets of the combined company are held by NuScale LLC, and NuScale Corp’s only assets are its equity interest in NuScale LLC and prepaid assets. NuScale Corp entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”) with NuScale LLC, each of the TRA Holders (as defined in the TRA), and Fluor, in its capacity as TRA Representative.
F-10


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
Pursuant to the TRA, NuScale Corp must pay 85% of the net cash tax savings from certain tax benefits, if any, warrants that may be issued upon conversionit realizes (or in certain cases is deemed to realize) as a result of Working Capital Loans (and any increases in tax basis and other tax benefits resulting from any exchange by the TRA holders of NuScale LLC Class B units for shares of Class A ordinary shares issuable uponcommon stock or cash in the exercisefuture.

NuScale Corp will benefit from the remaining 15% of cash tax savings, if any, realized as a result of such tax benefits. Cash tax savings will be computed by comparing NuScale Corp’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that NuScale Corp would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of its assets as a result of the Private PlacementTransaction or the exchanges and had NuScale Corp not entered into the TRA (calculated by making certain assumptions).

As of December 31, 2022, there have been 21,305,891 Class B units exchanged for shares of Class A common stock. Associated with these exchanged units we have calculated an implied TRA obligation of $54,651 as of December 31, 2022. However, NuScale Corp maintains a full valuation allowance and thus no liability related to projected obligations under the TRA has been recorded.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation

As part of the Transaction, NuScale Corp has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of NuScale Power, LLC (“NuScale LLC”), a variable interest entity (“VIE”). As the sole managing member of NuScale LLC, NuScale Corp has both the power to direct the activities, and direct ownership to share in the revenues and expenses of NuScale LLC. As such, all the activity of NuScale LLC has been consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. All assets and liabilities included in the balance sheet are that of NuScale LLC, other than the Warrants and warrants that may be issued$1,566 of prepaid assets. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated upon conversionconsolidation.

Changes in Presentation

Prior year amounts totaling $1,498 and $1,505 have been reclassified out of G&A expenses to other expenses for the Working Capital Loans) are entitledyears ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, to registration rights. The holdersconform to the current year presentation on the accompanying consolidated statements of the majorityoperations.

Use of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that we register such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to completion of a Business Combination. However, the registration and shareholder rights agreement provides that we will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lockup period. The registration and shareholder rights agreement does not contain liquidating damages or other cash settlement provisions resulting from delays in registering our securities. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.
Critical Accounting PoliciesEstimates
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. NuScale believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions thatmade when accounting for items and matters such as, but not limited to, depreciation, amortization, in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), asset valuations, equity-based compensation and contingencies are reasonable, based on information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities disclosureas of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expensesas well as amounts reported on the statements of operations during the period reported.periods presented. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents represent short-term, highly liquid investments, which are readily convertible to cash and have maturities of three months or less at time of purchase. Cash equivalents with an initial maturity of between three and twelve months at time of purchase are presented as short-term investments on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. Cash equivalents and short-term investments consist of certificates of deposit. These certificates of deposit are classified as held-to-maturity, and the estimated fair value of the investment approximates its amortized cost.

Cash in the amount of $26,532 is restricted as collateral for the letter of credit associated with the DCRA at December 31, 2022. There were no such restrictions at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The DCRA spans multiple years requiring the amount to be classified as a noncurrent asset, included in restricted cash in the consolidated balance sheet. The restricted
F-11


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
cash balance plus cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheet equals cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, as reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Accounts and Other Receivables
Accounts and other receivables include reimbursement requests outstanding from the DOE awards, interest receivable and commercial accounts receivable associated with other federal projects. The reimbursement requests outstanding from the DOE awards are recognized as eligible costs are incurred. Reimbursement under the awards are included in Department of Energy Cost Share in the consolidated statements of operations.

The majority of our receivables are either due from the U.S. federal government or have to do with a federal project. For these reasons, all receivables are deemed to be fully collectible and no allowance has been recorded.
In-process Research and Development
IPR&D represents incomplete research and development projects that had not reached technological feasibility as of their acquisition date in 2011. Due to the nature of IPR&D, the expected life is indefinite and it will be evaluated periodically for attainment of technological feasibility or impairment. Technological feasibility is established when an enterprise has completed all planning, designing, coding and testing activities that are necessary to establish that a product can be produced to meet its design specifications including functions, features and technical performance requirements. IPR&D was concluded to include both fundamental and defensive technologies comprised of OSU licensed and NuScale owned patented and unpatented technology and trade secrets. Such technologies are designed to work together in the operation of a nuclear power module.
The IPR&D is anticipated to begin generating cash flows in 2026 and is expected to contribute to all of the Company’s revenues for the foreseeable future after being placed in service.
IPR&D is amortized over its estimated useful life once technological feasibility is reached. As the Company has not yet completed all designing, coding and testing activities, management has determined that technological feasibility has not yet been reached. Management has not identified any critical accounting policies.indicators that would suggest any impairment of the IPR&D. If IPR&D is determined not to have technological feasibility or is abandoned, it will be impaired or written off at such time.
Derivative Warrant LiabilitiesRevenue Recognition
We doIn addition to advancing the commercialization of its SMR, the Company provides engineering services to customers.
The Company recognizes fixed price contract revenue with multiple performance obligations as each obligation is completed. The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation using an estimate of the stand-alone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. Revenue recognized on contracts that has not been billed to customers is classified as a current asset under accounts and other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet. Amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized are classified as a current liability under deferred revenue.
The Company recognizes time and material contract revenue as incurred, while our cost plus fixed-fee contract revenue is recognized over time, matching continuous transfer of control to the customer. The Company accounts for these contracts as a single performance obligation and recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method, based primarily on contract cost incurred to date compared to total estimated contract cost. The percentage-of-completion method (an input method) is the most faithful depiction of the Company’s performance because it directly measures the value of the services transferred to the customer. Changes to total estimated contract cost or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined as assessed at the contract level. Pre-contract costs are expensed as incurred unless they are expected to be recovered from the client.
The Company excludes from its measurement of transaction prices all taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are both (i) imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction and (ii) collected from customers. Accordingly, such tax amounts are not included as a component of revenue or cost of sales.
F-12


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
Customer payments on contracts are typically due within 30 days of billing, depending on the contract.
The Company generally provides limited warranties for work performed under its engineering contracts. The warranty periods typically extend for a limited duration following substantial completion of the Company’s work on a project. Historically, warranty claims have not resulted in material costs incurred, and for the periods presented, no warranty liability has been recorded.
Fair Value Measurement
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use derivativein pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the Company uses a three-level hierarchy, which prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach).
The levels of hierarchy are described below:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments;
Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to hedge exposuresthe fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to cash flow, market,the asset or foreign currency risks. We evaluate allliability. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the most stringent level of ourinput that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including issued stockprepaid expenses and deposits, accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible note payable approximates fair value due to their short maturities.
Property, Plant and Equipment
All additions, including betterments to existing facilities, are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the assets and the related accumulated depreciation is derecognized with any gain or loss recorded in the year of disposition.
Depreciation is based on the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over useful lives of seven years. Computer software is depreciated over useful lives of three to five years. Office and computer equipment is depreciated over useful lives of five years. Test equipment is depreciated over useful lives of five years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their estimated useful life or the remaining term of the associated lease.
Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets including primarily property and equipment and acquired IPR&D are reviewed for impairment annually and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If this review indicates that the carrying amount will not be recoverable, as determined based on comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows to the carrying amount, impairment is measured by comparing the carrying amount to fair value. No impairment charges were incurred for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
F-13


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase warrants,price paid over the fair value of the net assets of a business acquired in a purchase business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances arise during the year that indicate the carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value and an impairment loss is recognized.
Leases
The Company recognizes right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases with terms greater than 12 months. Leases are classified as either finance or operating leases. This classification dictates whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company has only operating leases.
The Company’s right-of-use assets relate to office facilities, some of which include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term up to 5 years. The exercise of the lease renewal is at the Company’s discretion. Renewal periods are included in the expected lease term if they are reasonably certain of being exercised by the Company. None of the Company’s lease agreements contain material residual value guarantees or material restrictions or covenants.
Long-term leases (leases with initial terms greater than 12 months) are capitalized at the present value of the minimum lease payments not yet paid. The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and ASC 815-15. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
We issued 11,500,000 warrants as partpresent value of the units offeredlease when the rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable.
Short-term leases (leases with an initial term of 12 months or less or leases that are cancelable by our Initial Public Offeringthe lessee and simultaneously withlessor without significant penalties) are not capitalized but are expensed on a straight-line basis over the closing of our Initial Public Offering, we issued in a private placement an aggregate of 8,900,000 private placement warrants. lease term. The Company’s short-term leases relate to office facilities or office equipment.

Warrant Liability

The Company accounts for the Warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7DAccounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, “Derivatives and 7FHedging”, under which the Warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as liabilities. Accordingly, the Company classifies the Warrants as liabilities at their fair value and adjusts the warrants to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company’s statementconsolidated statements of operations. The fair value of the Public and Private Placement Warrants has been estimated using the Public Warrants’ quoted market price. The Private Placement Warrants are valued using a Modified Black Scholes Option Pricing Model.

67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recent Accounting Standards
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on our financial statements.
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
AsSee note 5 for further discussion of December 31, 2020, we were not subject to any market or interest rate risk. Following the consummation of our Initial Public Offering, the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering, including amounts in the Trust Account, have been invested in certain U.S. government obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or in certain money market funds that invest solely in U.S. treasuries. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe there will be no associated material exposure to interest rate risk.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
This information appears following Item 16 of this Report and is included herein by reference.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2020. Based upon their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective as of December 31, 2020, due solely to the events that led to the Company’s restatement of its financial statements to reclassify the Company’s Warrants as described in the Explanatory Note to this Amendment, as of December 31, 2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2020, due solely to the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below in “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” In light of this material weakness, we performed additional analysis as deemed necessary to ensure that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A present fairly in all material respects our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the period presented.
We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors and all instances of fraud. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Further, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures can provide absolute assurance that we have detected all our control deficiencies and instances of fraud, if any. The design of disclosure controls and procedures also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of

68

TABLE OF CONTENTS

future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
Management’s Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
This Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by the rules of the SEC for newly public companies.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. In light of the restatement of our financial statements included in this Amendment, we plan to enhance our processes to identify and appropriately apply applicable accounting requirements to better evaluate and understand the nuances of the complex accounting standards that apply to our financial statements. Our plans at this time include providing enhanced access to accounting literature, research materials and documents and increased communication among our personnel and third-party professionals with whom we consult regarding complex accounting applications. The elements of our remediation plan can only be accomplished over time, and we can offer no assurance that these initiatives will ultimately have the intended effects.

69

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
As of the date of this Report, our directors and officers are as follows:
NameAgePosition
Christopher Sorrells52Chief Executive Officer and Director
Jeffrey Schramm50Chief Financial Officer
Robert Kaplan48Vice President of Business Development
William Quinn50Chairman and Director
Debora Frodl55Director
Richard Thompson72Director
Patrick Wood, III58Director
Christopher Sorrells serves as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board of directors. Mr. Sorrells is also the Chief Executive Officer and a director of SVII. Mr. Sorrells has been an investor, operator, advisor and board member in the Sustainability industry for over 20 years. Mr. Sorrells currently serves as Lead Director and Chairman of the Compensation Committee for Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: REGI), having previously served as Vice Chairman of its board. Previously, Mr. Sorrells served as a Managing Director and then as an Operating Partner of NGP ETP, an affiliate of NGP, a leading energy private equity fund with $20 billion of assets under management, which he helped grow into one of the most successful Sustainability-focused private equity funds. Mr. Sorrells and/or his former firms including NGP ETP have invested in a broad range of companies across the Sustainability industry, including Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: REGI), Power-One, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: PWER), Caminus Corporation (formerly Nasdaq: CAMZ), Waste Resource Management, Inc., TPI Composites, Inc. (Nasdaq: TPIC) and others. In addition to leading investments, Mr. Sorrells has held a number of board positions for numerous public and private firms, including groSolar (which was later sold to EDF Renewables Inc.), GSE Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: GVP) and Living Earth (which was later sold to Bain Capital Double Impact). As an operator, Mr. Sorrells has held a variety of senior executive leadership roles at Sustainability-focused companies including serving as Chief Operating Officer and Director of GSE Systems, Inc. Mr. Sorrells started his career in the energy, power and Sustainability industries as an investment banker at Salomon Smith Barney in 1996 and later at Banc of America Securities LLC where he created one of the first Sustainability-focused investment banking teams in 2000. Mr. Sorrells received his Master of Accounting from University of Southern California, an M.B.A. from The College of William and Mary and a B.A. from Washington and Lee University. We believe Mr. Sorrells’s significant experience in the Sustainability industry in both private and public companies as well as in various related investment roles makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
William Quinn serves as the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Mr. Quinn is also the Chairman of the board of directors of SVII and Victory. Mr. Quinn has over 25 years of private equity investment experience and has been involved in transactions totaling in the multi-billion dollars in aggregate value. Currently, Mr. Quinn is the Managing Partner of Pearl, an investment firm with $1.2 billion of committed capital under management that he founded in 2015. Prior to founding Pearl, Mr. Quinn served as a Co-Managing Partner of Natural Gas Partners. During his time at NGP, the firm raised funds totaling over $10 billion in cumulative committed capital, made multiple investments in the upstream, midstream and oilfield service and created a dedicated sustainable technology investment platform, NGP Energy Technology Partners. Mr. Quinn was a key contributor to the formation of NGP ETP in 2005 and served on its investment committee until 2013, during which time he oversaw their investments in the Sustainability, oil and gas, power, environmental, energy efficiency and clean energy subsectors, including Renewable Energy Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: REGI) and TPI Composites, Inc. (Nasdaq: TPIC), a global leader in wind blade manufacturing. Prior to joining NGP, Mr. Quinn worked at Rainwater, Inc. and Hicks, Muse, Tate and Furst, Inc. and worked as an analyst in the investment banking divisions of Bear Stearns & Co. and BT

70

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Securities Corporation. Mr. Quinn has served on the board of directors of numerous public and private companies, including Resolute Energy Corporation (NYSE: REN), which was taken public via Hicks Acquisition Company I in 2009 and subsequently sold to Cimarex Energy Co. (NYSE: XEC) in early 2019, and Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (Nasdaq: EROC). In addition to his investing activities, Mr. Quinn serves on the Board of Overseers of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and serves as a guest lecturer on private equity investing at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Quinn received a B.S.E. in Finance from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and an M.B.A. from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. We believe Mr. Quinn’s significant experience in the Sustainability industry in both private and public companies as well as in various related investment roles makes him well qualified to serve as Chairman of our board of directors.
Jeffrey Schramm serves as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Schramm is also the Chief Financial Officer of SVII and Victory, in which capacities he has served since 2021. Mr. Schramm has over 20 years of leadership, finance and operations experience in advanced materials and specialty chemical organizations with a deep understanding of the Sustainability industry having worked with some of the leading venture capital and private equity funds such as Kleiner Perkins, Index Ventures and NGP Energy Technology Partners. Previously, Mr. Schramm served as Chief Financial Officer at Lehigh from 2009 until 2019 where he was responsible for raising both debt and equity, as well as financial and administrative functions. Mr. Schramm was instrumental in Lehigh’s sale to a publicly traded company and largest tire manufacturer in Europe, Michelin, as the key part of its sustainability initiative. Prior to that, Mr. Schramm served as Vice President of Finance for Euramax International, Inc. (now OmniMax International, Inc.) in the Exterior Products & Fabral (fabrication) divisions from 2007 until 2009 where he managed a large multilocation team supporting revenues close to $1 billion annually. From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Schramm was with Kemira Chemicals, Inc. (formerly Vulcan Performance Chemicals) as head of Financial Planning & Analysis and North American CFO over the Pulp & Paper and Water Treatment specialty chemical businesses. During his time at Kemira Chemicals, Inc., he was a key member of the acquisition team acquiring the Pulp & Paper chemicals business from Lanxess (LXS.DE) and the Pulp & Paper business from FinnChem USA. In 1993 to 2000, Mr. Schramm began his career at Milliken & Company in various roles starting in Accounting, Controllership and later served as Financial Planning & Analysis Manager in Procurement. Mr. Schramm earned a B.S. in Corporate Finance and Investment Management from the University of Alabama, and an M.B.A from LaGrange College.
Robert Kaplan serves as our Vice President of Business Development. Mr. Kaplan has over 20 years of investment banking experience in the Sustainability industry. Mr. Kaplan has been involved in over 60 transactions totaling approximately $6 billion in transaction value. Mr. Kaplan was most recently Managing Director of Clean Technologies / Renewables at Stifel. In this role, Mr. Kaplan was responsible for the firm’s capital markets and advisory services in various sustainability subsectors, including, clean energy, biofuels, energy storage, energy efficiency, mobility and environmental technologies. He joined Stifel in 2010 in connection with Stifel’s acquisition of TWP in 2010. Mr. Kaplan joined TWP in 2007 as a Vice President in the Technology investment banking group with a focus on sustainable technologies. Prior to joining TWP, Mr. Kaplan started his investment banking career at First Albany where he was a founding member of one of the first Sustainability focused banking franchise on Wall Street. During his tenure at First Albany, he completed many of the industry’s first public offerings in various sustainability subsectors, such as solar, alternative fuels, mobility, fuel cells and the smart grid. Mr. Kaplan serves on the board of directors of TWO NIL, LLC. Mr. Kaplan received a B.S. in Finance from Lehigh University and an M.B.A. from the NYU Stern School of Business.
Debora Frodl serves as a board member. Ms. Frodl has over 30 years of international business experience with General Electric Company. From 2012 to 2017, Ms. Frodl served as the Global Executive Director of Ecomagination. Ms. Frodl repositioned this sustainable technology strategy into one of multi-faceted innovation and expansive global growth. During Ms. Frodl’s tenure from 2012 to 2017, GE Ecomagination’s revenues exceeded $125 billion. From 2010 to 2012, Ms. Frodl served as GE’s Chief Strategy Officer and Global Alternative Fuels Leader where she pioneered the business strategy to decarbonize the commercial fleet industry through alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure technologies. From 2005 to 2010, Ms. Frodl served as Chief Commercial Officer of GE Capital Fleet Services, from 2004 to 2005, as Chief Marketing Officer of GE Capital Commercial Equipment Finance and from 2002 to 2004, as Chief Executive Officer of

71

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GE Capital Dealer Finance. From 1999 to 2004, Ms. Frodl served as Chief Executive Officer of GE Capital Public Finance. Currently Ms. Frodl serves on the board of directors for Renewable Energy Group, Inc. and ITC Holdings Corp. and Chair of the board for XL Hybrids, a leader in smart vehicle electrification for commercial fleets. Ms. Frodl has been recognized by Green Building & Design as 2017 “Woman in Sustainability Leadership,” Women’s Council on Energy and the Environment as 2014 “Woman of the Year,” Connected World Magazine as 2013 “Top Women in M2M.” She holds an M.B.A. from the University of St. Thomas and BSBA from Minnesota State University. We believe Ms. Frodl’s significant experience in the Sustainability industry in several public company roles makes her well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Richard Thompson serves as a board member. Mr. Thompson has over 35 years of international business experience in renewable energy, power electronics and semiconductors, including several billion-dollar public exits in the Sustainability industry. Currently, Mr. Thompson is a strategic adviser to Sumeru Equity Partners, a technology-focused private equity firm. From 2014 to 2016, he was Executive Chairman of AVI-SPL, an approximately $580 million privately held, global leader in video communications. From 2008 to October 2013, Mr. Thompson was President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Power-One, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: PWER), a leading provider of renewable energy and power conversion solutions. During his tenure, he successfully led the company through restructuring to become one of the largest renewable energy inverter suppliers worldwide, generating over $1 billion in sales in 2012, along with its sale to ABB (NYSE: ABB) for over $1 billion in equity value. Prior to joining Power-One, Inc., Mr. Thompson was Chief Financial Officer of American Power Conversion Corporation (Nasdaq: APCC) from 2005 to 2007, which was acquired in March 2007 by a French competitor, Schneider Electric SA (Paris: SU.PA), in an auction for approximately $6 billion in enterprise value. From 1997 to 2005, Mr. Thompson was Chief Financial Officer of Artesyn Technologies (Nasdaq: ATSN) and was instrumental in creating one of the leading power component companies in the industry which was later sold to Emerson (NYSE: EMR) for $500 million. In addition to his role at Artesyn, he was also General Manager of Spider Software and led the company’s merger with Zytec Inc. that created a robust power component and computer board business. We believe Mr. Thompson’s significant experience in the Sustainability industry in both private and public companies makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Patrick Wood, III serves as a board member. Mr. Wood has over 25 years of experience in the development, financing, regulation, and the legal and policy issues of energy infrastructure. Currently, Mr. Wood serves as CEO of the Hunt Energy Network, a distributed energy platform company, since February 2019. Known for his role in setting up competitive energy markets in Texas and across the country, Mr. Wood served as Chairman of both the Public Utility Commission of Texas from 1995 to 2001 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission from 2001 to 2005. Since leaving public service, he has focused on developing energy infrastructure projects and companies. He currently serves as a director of SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWR) and of Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE: PWR), including his recent appointment to Luma Energy, overseeing the Quanta-ATCO joint venture to operate the Puerto Rico utility system. Mr. Wood served as board chairman of independent power producer Dynegy from its emergence from bankruptcy in 2012 through its merger with Vistra Energy in 2018 for $1.7 billion in an all-stock deal, creating a $10 billion publicly traded equity valued company upon closing. He was a strategic advisor to Natural Gas Partners from 2005 to 2014, when he became an independent director of Memorial Resources Development (Nasdaq: MRD) upon its IPO in 2014. MRD was subsequently sold to Range Resources in 2016 for $4.2 billion in enterprise value. Mr. Wood was also a past director of TPI Composites, Inc. (Nasdaq: TPIC) and has prior affiliations with InfraREIT (NYSE: HIFR), Airtricity, First Wind, Texas Genco, The Texas A&M Smart Grid Council, the American Council on Renewable Energy, and remains a member of the National Petroleum Council. We believe Mr. Wood’s significant experience in the Sustainability industry in both corporate and government positions makes him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
Number and Terms of Office of Officers and Directors
Our board of directors is divided into three classes, with only one class of directors being appointed in each year, and with each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual general meeting) serving a three-year term. In accordance with the Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual meeting until one year after our first fiscal year end following our listing on the Nasdaq. The term of office of the first class of directors, consisting of Mr. Thompson and Mr. Wood, will

72

TABLE OF CONTENTS

expire at our first annual meeting of shareholders. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of Ms. Frodl, will expire at our second annual meeting of shareholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting of Mr. Sorrells and Mr. Quinn, will expire at our third annual meeting of shareholders.
Pursuant to an agreement entered into prior to the closing of our initial public offering, our sponsor, upon and following consummation of an initial business combination, will be entitled to nominate three individuals for appointment to our board of directors, as long as the sponsor holds any securities covered by the registration and shareholder rights agreement.
Our officers are appointed by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board of directors, rather than for specific terms of office. Our board of directors is authorized to appoint persons to the offices set forth in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association as it deems appropriate. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that our officers may consist of one or more chairman of the board, chief executive officer, president, chief financial officer, vice presidents, secretary, treasurer and such other offices as may be determined by the board of directors.
Director Independence
Nasdaq listing standards require that a majority of our board of directors be independent. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our board of directors has determined that Ms. Frodl, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. Wood are “independent directors” as defined in the Nasdaq listing standards. Our independent directors will have regularly scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.
Executive Officer and Director Compensation
None of our executive officers or directors have received any cash compensation for services rendered to us. Commencing on the date that our securities are first listed on the Nasdaq through the earlier of consummation of our initial business combination and our liquidation, we will reimburse an affiliate of our sponsor for office space, secretarial and administrative services provided to us in the amount of $10,000 per month. In addition, our sponsor, executive officers and directors, or their respective affiliates will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee will review on a quarterly basis all payments that were made by us to our sponsor, executive officers or directors, or their affiliates. Any such payments prior to an initial business combination will be made using funds held outside the trust account. Other than quarterly audit committee review of such reimbursements, we do not expect to have any additional controls in place governing our reimbursement payments to our directors and executive officers for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with our activities on our behalf in connection with identifying and consummating an initial business combination. Other than these payments and reimbursements, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid by the company to our sponsor, executive officers and directors, or their respective affiliates, prior to completion of our initial business combination. In September 2020, our sponsor transferred 40,000 Class B ordinary shares to each of our directors.
After the completion of our initial business combination, directors or members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting or management fees from the combined company. All of these fees will be fully disclosed to shareholders, to the extent then known, in the proxy solicitation materials or tender offer materials furnished to our shareholders in connection with a proposed business combination. We have not established any limit on the amount of such fees that may be paid by the combined company to our directors or members of management. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of the proposed business combination, because the directors of the post-combination business will be responsible for determining executive officer and director compensation. Any compensation to be paid to our executive officers will be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by a compensation committee constituted solely by independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.

73

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We do not intend to take any action to ensure that members of our management team maintain their positions with us after the consummation of our initial business combination, although it is possible that some or all of our executive officers and directors may negotiate employment or consulting arrangements to remain with us after our initial business combination. The existence or terms of any such employment or consulting arrangements to retain their positions with us may influence our management’s motivation in identifying or selecting a target business but we do not believe that the ability of our management to remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination will be a determining factor in our decision to proceed with any potential business combination. We are not party to any agreements with our executive officers and directors that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, our board of directors will have three standing committees: an audit committee, a nominating committee and a compensation committee. Subject to phase-in rules and a limited exception, the rules of the Nasdaq and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act require that the audit committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors. Subject to phase-in rules and a limited exception, the rules of the Nasdaq require that the compensation committee and the nominating committee of a listed company be comprised solely of independent directors.
Audit Committee
Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, we will establish an audit committee of the board of directors. Ms. Frodl, Mr. Thompson and Mr. Wood will serve as members of our audit committee. Our board of directors has determined that each of Ms. Frodl, Mr. Thompson and Mr. Wood are independent under the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules. Mr. Thompson will serve as the Chairman of the audit committee. Under the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC rules, all the directors on the audit committee must be independent. Each member of the audit committee is financially literate and our board of directors has determined that Mr. Thompson qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules.
The audit committee is responsible for:

meeting with our independent registered public accounting firm regarding, among other issues, audits, and adequacy of our accounting and control systems;

monitoring the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm;

verifying the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit as required by law;

inquiring and discussing with management our compliance with applicable laws and regulations;

pre-approving all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm, including the fees and terms of the services to be performed;

appointing or replacing the independent registered public accounting firm;

determining the compensationWarrants and oversightnote 6 for further discussion of the workmethodology used to determine the value of the independent registered public accounting firm (including resolutionWarrants.

Equity-Based Compensation
Our long-term incentive plan provides for grants of disagreements between managementnonqualified or incentive stock options, restricted stock award units (“RSU”s) and performance-based award units.

Equity-based compensation is measured using a fair value-based method for all equity-based awards. The cost of awarded equity instruments is recognized based on each instrument’s grant-date fair value over the period during which the grantee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The determination of fair value for nonqualified or incentive stock options requires significant judgment and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purposeuse of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retentionestimates, particularly with regard to Black-Scholes assumptions such as stock price, volatility and treatmentexpected option lives to value equity-based compensation, while forfeitures are recognized as incurred. The grant date fair value of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or reports which raise material issues regarding our financial statements or accounting policies;

monitoring compliance on a quarterly basis with the terms of our initial public offering and, if any noncomplianceRSUs is identified, immediately taking all action necessary to rectify such noncompliance or otherwise causing compliance with the terms of our initial public offering; and

74

TABLE OF CONTENTS


reviewing and approving all payments made to our existing shareholders, executive officers or directors and their respective affiliates. Any payments made to members of our audit committee will be reviewed and approved by our board of directors, with the interested director or directors abstaining from such review and approval.
Nominating Committee
Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, we will establish a nominating committee of our board of directors. The members of our nominating committee will be Ms. Frodl, Mr. Thompson and Mr. Wood, and Ms. Frodl will serve as chairman of the nominating committee. Under the Nasdaq listing standards, we are required to have a nominating committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our board of directors has determined that each of Ms. Frodl, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. Wood are independent.
The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors. The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, shareholders, investment bankers and others.
Guidelines for Selecting Director
The guidelines for selecting nominees, which is specified in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, generally provide that persons to be nominated:
1.
should have demonstrated notable or significant achievements in business, education or public service;
2.
should possess the requisite intelligence, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the board of directors and bring a range of skills, diverse perspectives and backgrounds to its deliberations; and
3.
should have the highest ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and intense dedication to serving the interests of the shareholders.
The nominating committee will consider a number of qualifications relating to management and leadership experience, background and integrity and professionalism in evaluating a person’s candidacy for membershipbased on the board of directors. The nominating committee may require certain skills or attributes, such as financial or accounting experience, to meet specific board needs that arise from time to time and will also consider the overall experience and makeup of its members to obtain a broad and diverse mix of board members. The nominating committee does not distinguish among nominees recommended by shareholders and other persons.
Code of Ethics
Upon the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this Report forms a part, we will have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our directors, officers and employees. A copy of the Code of Ethics will be provided without charge upon request from us. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of certain provisions of our Code of Ethics in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Conflicts of Interest
Under Cayman Islands law, directors and officers owe the following fiduciary duties:

duty to act in good faith in what the director or officer believes to be in the best interests of the company as a whole;

duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which those powers were conferred and not for a collateral purpose;

directors should not improperly fetter the exercise of future discretion;

duty to exercise powers fairly as between different sections of shareholders;

75

TABLE OF CONTENTS


duty not to put themselves in a position in which there is a conflict between their duty to the company and their personal interests; and

duty to exercise independent judgment.
In addition to the above, directors also owe a duty of care which is not fiduciary in nature. This duty has been defined as a requirement to act as a reasonably diligent person having both the general knowledge, skill and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the same functions as are carried out by that director in relation to the company and the general knowledge skill and experience of that director.
As set out above, directors have a duty not to put themselves in a position of conflict and this includes a duty not to engage in self-dealing, or to otherwise benefit as a result of their position. However, in some instances what would otherwise be a breach of this duty can be forgiven and/or authorized in advance by the shareholders provided that there is full disclosure by the directors. This can be done by way of permission granted in the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association or alternatively by shareholder approval at general meetings.
Certain of our officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary and contractual duties to other entities. As a result, if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, then, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law, he or she will need to honor such fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination opportunity to such entity, before we can pursue such opportunity. If these other entities decide to pursue any such opportunity, we may be precluded from pursuing the same. However, we do not expect these duties to materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that we renounce our interest in any business combination opportunity offered to any director or officer unless such opportunity is expressly offered to such person solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of the company and it is an opportunity that we are able to complete on a reasonable basis.
Below is a table summarizing the entities to which our executive officers and directors currently have fiduciary duties, contractual obligations or other material management relationships:
IndividualEntityEntity’s BusinessAffiliation
Christopher SorrellsRenewable Energy Group, Inc.EnergyLead Director and Chairman of the Compensation Committee
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. IISpecial Purpose Acquisition CompanyChief Executive Officer and Director
Jeffrey SchrammFinstat LLCConsultingFounder
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. IISpecial Purpose Acquisition CompanyChief Financial Officer
Victory Acquisition Corp.Special Purpose Acquisition CompanyChief Financial Officer
Robert KaplanTwo Nil, LLCMarketingDirector
RK Management, Inc.Management /ConsultingFounder

76

TABLE OF CONTENTS

IndividualEntityEntity’s BusinessAffiliation
William QuinnPearl Energy Investment Management, LLC(1)Private EquityManaging Partner
Board of Overseers of the Wharton School of the University of PennsylvaniaEducationDirector
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. IISpecial Purpose Acquisition CompanyChairman of the Board
Victory Acquisition Corp.Special Purpose Acquisition CompanyChairman of the Board
Debora FrodlRenewable Energy Group, Inc.EnergyDirector
XL HybridsEnergy / AutomotiveChairman
ITC Holdings Corp.EnergyDirector
Richard ThompsonSumeru Equity PartnersPrivate EquityStrategic Advisor
Patrick Wood, IIIHunt Energy NetworkEnergyPresident
Wood3 ResourcesEnergyPrincipal
SunPower CorporationEnergyDirector
Quanta Services, Inc.EnergyDirector

Our sponsor subscribed for founder shares prior to the date of this Report and purchased private placement warrants in a transaction that closed simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering.

Our sponsor and each member of our management team have entered into an agreement with us, pursuant to which they have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to any founder shares and public shares held by them in connection with (i) the completion of our initial business combination and (ii) a shareholder vote to approve an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) that would modify the substance or timing of our obligation to provide holders of our Class A ordinary shares the right to have their shares redeemed in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within 18 months from the closing of our initial public offering, prior to the Contractual Redemption Date if extended at our sponsor’s option or during any Extension Period, or (B) with respect to any other provision relating to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares. Additionally, our sponsor has agreed to waive its rights to liquidating distributions from the trust account with respect to its founder shares if we fail to complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame. If we do not complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame, the private placement warrants will expire worthless. Except as described herein, our sponsor and our directors and executive officers have agreed, and certain of the anchor investors will agree, not to transfer, assign or sell any of their founder shares until the earliest of (A) one year after the completion of our initial business combination and (B) subsequent to our initial business combination, (x) if the closingmarket price of our Class A ordinarycommon stock on the grant date as stated on the NYSE.

The option valuation model used to calculate the Company’s options uses the treasury yield curve rates for the risk-free interest rate for a period equal to the expected option life and the simplified method to calculate the expected option life
F-14


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares equals or exceeds $12.00and per share (as adjusted for share subdivisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and other similar transactions) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least 150 days after our initial business combination, or (y) the date on which we complete a liquidation, merger, share exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of our public shareholders having the right to exchange their ordinary shares for cash, securities or other property. Exceptamounts)
(options qualified as described herein, the private placement warrants will not be transferable until 30 days following the completion of our initial business combination. Because each of our executive officers and directors own ordinary shares or warrants directly or indirectly, they may have a conflict of interest in determining whether a particular target business is an appropriate business with which to effectuate our initial business combination.

77

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Our officers and directors may have a conflict of interest with respect to evaluating a particular business combination if the retention or resignation of any such officers and directors is included by a target business as a condition to any agreement with respect to our initial business combination. In addition, our sponsor, officers and directors may sponsor, form or participate in other blank check companies similar to ours during the period in which we are seeking an initial business combination. Any such companies may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an acquisition target, particularly in the event there is overlap among investment mandates.
We cannot assure you that any of the above mentioned conflicts will be resolved in our favor.
We are not prohibited from pursuing an initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor, officers or directors. In the event we seek to complete our initial business combination with a company that is affiliated with our sponsor or any of our officers or directors, we, or a committee of independent directors, will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that such initial business combination is fair to our company from a financial point of view. We are not required to obtain such an opinion in any other context.
Furthermore, in no event will our sponsor or any of our existing officers or directors, or their respective affiliates, be paid by us any finder’s fee, consulting fee or other compensation prior to, or for any services they render in order to effectuate, the completion of our initial business combination. Further, commencing on the date our securities are first listed on the Nasdaq, we will also reimburse an affiliate of our sponsor for office space, secretarial and administrative services provided to us in the amount of $10,000 per month.
If we seek shareholder approval, we will complete our initial business combination only if we obtain the approval of an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the company. In such case, our sponsor and each member of our management team have agreed to vote their founder shares and public shares in favor of our initial business combination.
Limitation on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against willful default, willful neglect, civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide for indemnification of our officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by law, including for any liability incurred in their capacities as such, except through their own actual fraud, willful default or willful neglect. We will enter into agreements with our directors and officers to provide contractual indemnification in addition to the indemnification provided for in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. We expect to purchase a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our officers and directors against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances and insures us against our obligations to indemnify our officers and directors.
Our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the trust account, and have agreed to waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any services provided to us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason whatsoever (except to the extent they are entitled to funds from the trust account due to their ownership of public shares). Accordingly, any indemnification provided will only be able to be satisfied by us if (i) we have sufficient funds outside of the trust account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination.
Our indemnification obligations may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification provisions.

78

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We believe that these provisions, the insurance and the indemnity agreements are necessary to attract and retain talented and experienced officers and directors.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Officer and Director Compensation
The following disclosure concerns the compensation of our executive officers and directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (i.e., pre-business combination).
None of our executive officers or directors have received any cash compensation for services rendered to us. Commencing on the date that our securities are first listed on the Nasdaq through the earlier of consummation of our initial business combination and our liquidation, we will reimburse an affiliate of our sponsor for office space, secretarial and administrative services provided to us in the amount of $10,000 per month. In addition, our sponsor, executive officers and directors, or their respective affiliates will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee will review on a quarterly basis all payments that were made by us to our sponsor, executive officers or directors, or their affiliates. Any such payments prior to an initial business combination will be made using funds held outside the trust account. Other than quarterly audit committee review of such reimbursements, we do not expect to have any additional controls in place governing our reimbursement payments to our directors and executive officers for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with our activities on our behalf in connection with identifying and consummating an initial business combination. Other than these payments and reimbursements, no compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid by the company to our sponsor, executive officers and directors, or their respective affiliates, prior to completion of our initial business combination. In September 2020, our sponsor transferred 40,000 Class B ordinary shares to each of our directors.
After the completion of our initial business combination, directors or members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting or management fees from the combined company. All of these fees will be fully disclosed to shareholders, to the extent then known, in the proxy solicitation materials or tender offer materials furnished to our shareholders in connection with a proposed business combination. We have not established any limit on the amount of such fees that may be paid by the combined company to our directors or members of management. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of the proposed business combination, because the directors of the post-combination business will be responsible for determining executive officer and director compensation. Any compensation to be paid to our executive officers will be determined, or recommended to the board of directors for determination, either by a compensation committee constituted solely by independent directors or by a majority of the independent directors on our board of directors.
We do not intend to take any action to ensure that members of our management team maintain their positions with us after the consummation of our initial business combination, although it is possible that some or all of our executive officers and directors may negotiate employment or consulting arrangements to remain with us after our initial business combination. The existence or terms of any such employment or consulting arrangements to retain their positions with us may influence our management’s motivation in identifying or selecting a target business but we do not believe that the ability of our management to remain with us after the consummation of our initial business combination will be a determining factor in our decision to proceed with any potential business combination. We are not party to any agreements with our executive officers and directors that provide for benefits upon termination of employment.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares as of the date of this Report, based on information obtained from the persons below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Class A ordinary shares, by:

each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares;

79

TABLE OF CONTENTS


each of our executive officers and directors that beneficially own ordinary shares; and

all our executive officers and directors as a group.
In the table below, percentage ownership is based on 23,000,000 Class A ordinary shares (which includes Class A ordinary shares that are underlying the units) and 5,750,000 Class B ordinary shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of our ordinary shares beneficially owned by them. The following table does not reflect record or beneficial ownership of the private placement warrants as these warrants are not exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Report.
Class B common stockClass A common stock
Name of Beneficial Owners(1)
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Approximate
Percentage
of Class
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
Approximate
Percentage
of Class
SV Acquisition Sponsor Sub, LLC (holdco)5,630,00097.9%
Spring Valley Acquisition Sponsor, LLC (our sponsor)5,630,00097.9%
William Quinn(2)
5,630,00097.9%
Christopher Sorrells
Jeffrey Schramm
Robert Kaplan
Debora Frodl40,000*
Richard Thompson40,000*
Patrick Wood, III40,000*
All officers and directors as a group (seven individuals)5,750,000100%
Citadel Advisors LLC(3)
1,580,0006.9%
Adage Capital Partners, L.P.(4)
1,800,0007.83%
CVI Investments, Inc.(5)
1,980,0008.6%
Kepos Capital LP(6)
1,270,7015.5%
Polar Asset Management Partners Inc.(7)
1,980,0008.61%
*
Less than one percent.
(1)
Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of our stockholders is 2100 McKinney Ave, Suite 1675, Dallas, TX 75201.
(2)
This individual, as well as SVAC’s holdco, holds a direct or indirect interest in the Sponsor. Each such person disclaims any beneficial ownership of the reported shares other than to the extent of any pecuniary interest they may have therein, directly or indirectly.
(3)
Includes Class A ordinary shares beneficially held by Citadel Advisors Holdings LP, Citadel GP LLC, Citadel Securities LLC, CALC IV LP, Citadel Securities GP LLC, and Kenneth Griffin based on a Schedule 13G filed on December 4, 2020. The business address for Citadel Advisors Holdings LP, Citadel GP LLC, Citadel Securities LLC, CALC IV LP, Citadel Securities GP LLC, and Kenneth Griffin is 131 S. Dearborn Street, 32nd Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60603.
(4)
Includes Class A ordinary shares beneficially held by Adage Capital Partners, L.P., Adage Capital Partners GP, L.L.C., Adage Capital Advisors, L.L.C., Robert Atchinson, and Phillip Gross based on a Schedule 13G filed on December 07, 2020. The business address for Adage Capital Partners, L.P., Adage Capital Partners GP, L.L.C., Adage Capital Advisors, L.L.C., Robert Atchinson, and Phillip Gross is 200 Clarendon Street, 52nd Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02116.
(5)
Includes Class A ordinary shares beneficially held by CVI Investments, Inc. and Heights Capital Management, Inc. based on a Schedule 13G filed on December 14, 2020. The business address for CVI Investments, Inc. is Ugland House, South Church Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104,

80

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cayman Islands. The business address for Heights Capital Management, Inc. is 101 California Street, Suite 3250, San Francisco, California 94111.
(6)
Includes Class A ordinary shares beneficially held by Kepos Capital LP and Mark Carhart based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 04, 2021. The business address for Kepos Capital LP and Mark Carhart is 11 Times Square, 35th Floor, New York, New York 10036.
(7)
Includes Class A ordinary shares beneficially held by Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. based on a Schedule 13G filed on February 11, 2021. The business address for Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. is 401 Bay Street, Suite 1900, PO Box 19, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4, Canada.
Our sponsor, officers and directors are deemed to be our “promoter” as such term is defined‘plain vanilla’ under the federal securities laws.
Changes in Control
None.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Founder Shares
On August 21, 2020, our sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share, to cover certain expenses on our behalf in considerationprovisions of 7,187,500 Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001. In September 2020, our sponsor transferred 40,000 Class B ordinary shares to each of our directors. On October 22, 2020, our sponsor effected a surrender of 1,437,500 founder shares to the company for no consideration, resulting in a decrease in the number of Class B ordinary shares outstanding from 7,187,500 to 5,750,000, such that the total number of founder shares would represent 20% of the total number of ordinary shares outstanding upon completion of our initial public offering. Our sponsor transferred all of the founder shares held by it to holdco prior to the consummation of our initial public offering. The number of founder shares issued wasSAB 107). Volatility is determined based on the expectation that such founder shares would represent 20% of the issued and outstanding shares upon completion of our initial public offering. The founder shares (including the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise thereof) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by the holder.
Our sponsor, pursuant to a written agreement, purchased an aggregate of 8,900,000 private placement warrants for a purchase price of  $1.00 per whole warrant in a private placement that occurred simultaneously with the closing of our initial public offering. The private placement warrants (including the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise thereof) may not, subject to certain limited exceptions, be transferred, assigned or sold by the holder until 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination.
Holdco is controlled by our sponsor, which is controlled by Pearl Energy Investment II, L.P. NGP Pearl Holdings II, L.L.C., an affiliate of an investment fund managed by NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, has a passive minority interest in our sponsor.
The anchor investors purchased up to 1,980,000 units each in our initial public offering. Further, each of the anchor investors entered into a separate agreement with our sponsor pursuant to which each such investor purchased 142,187 founder shares or membership interests in holdco representing an indirect beneficial interest in 142,187 founder shares, in each case for $494.56, or approximately $0.003 per share. Neither the membership interests in holdco nor the founder shares to be directly or indirectly owned by such investors will be subject to forfeiture without their consent. The founder shares owned directly or indirectly by such investors will be subject to the additional restrictions agreed to by our sponsor in connection with our initial business combination See “Description of Securities — Founder Shares” for a description of such restrictions. The founder shares to be directly or indirectly owned by such investors will be otherwise identical to the founder shares beneficially owned by our sponsor.
Pursuant to certain subscription agreements with our sponsor, the anchor investors party thereto were not granted any material additional stockholder or other rights, and were only issued membership interests

81

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in holdco with no right to control holdco or vote or dispose of any founder shares (which will continue to be held by holdco until following our initial business combination). Further, the anchor investors are not required to: (i) other as described above, hold any units, Class A ordinary shares or warrants they may purchase in our initial public offering or thereafter for any amount time, (ii) vote any Class A ordinary shares they may own at the applicable time in favor of our initial business combination or (iii) refrain from exercising their right to redeem their public shares at the time of our initial business combination.
In the event that the anchor investors continue to hold the units purchased in our initial public offering and vote in favor of our initial business combination, a smaller portion of affirmative votes from other public shareholders would be required to approve our initial business combination.
As more fully discussed in the section of this Report entitled “Management — Conflicts of Interest,” if any of our officers or directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity that falls within the line of business of any entity to which he or she has then-current fiduciary or contractual obligations, he or she may be required to honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such opportunity to such entity. Our officers and directors currently have certain relevant fiduciary duties or contractual obligations that may take priority over their duties to us.
We currently maintain our executive offices at 2100 McKinney Ave, Suite 1675, Dallas, TX 75201. The cost for our use of this space is included in the $10,000 per month fee we will pay to an affiliate of our sponsor for office space, administrative and support services, commencing on the date that our securities are first listed on the Nasdaq. Upon completion of our initial business combination or our liquidation, we will cease paying these monthly fees.
No compensation of any kind, including finder’s and consulting fees, will be paid to our sponsor, officers and directors, or their respective affiliates, for services rendered prior to or in connection with the completion of an initial business combination. However, these individuals will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with activities on our behalf such as identifying potential target businesses and performing due diligence on suitable business combinations. Our audit committee will review on a quarterly basis all payments that were made by us to our sponsor, officers, directors or their affiliates and will determine which expenses and the amount of expenses that will be reimbursed. There is no cap or ceiling on the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by such persons in connection with activities on our behalf.
In addition, in order to finance transaction costs in connection with an intended initial business combination, our sponsor or an affiliate of our sponsor or certain of our officers and directors may, but are not obligated to, loan us funds as may be required. If we complete an initial business combination, we may repay such loaned amounts out of the proceeds of the trust account released to us. In the event that the initial business combination does not close, we may use a portion of the working capital held outside the trust account to repay such loaned amounts but no proceeds from our trust account would be used for such repayment. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant at the option of the lender. The warrants would be identical to the private placement warrants, including as to exercise price, exercisability and exercise period. The terms of such loans by our officers and directors, if any, have not been determined and no written agreements exist with respect to such loans. We do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our sponsor, its affiliates or our management team as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account.
After our initial business combination, members of our management team who remain with us may be paid consulting, management or other fees from the combined company with any and all amounts being fully disclosed to our shareholders, to the extent then known, in the tender offer or proxy solicitation materials, as applicable, furnished to our shareholders. It is unlikely the amount of such compensation will be known at the time of distribution of such tender offer materials or at the time of a general meeting held to consider our initial business combination, as applicable, as it will be up to the directors of the post-combination business to determine executive and director compensation.

82

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We entered into a registration and shareholder rights agreement pursuant to which our sponsor will is entitled to certain registration rights with respect to the private placement warrants, the warrants issuable upon conversion of working capital loans (if any) and the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the foregoing and upon conversion of the founder shares, and, upon consummation of our initial business combination, to nominate three individuals for appointment to our board of directors, as long as the sponsor holds any securities covered by the registration and shareholder rights agreement, which is described under the section of this Report entitled “Description of Securities — Registration and Shareholder Rights.”
Policy for Approval of Related Party Transactions
The audit committee of our board of directors will adopt a charter, providing for the review, approval and/or ratification of “related party transactions,” which are those transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the SEC, by the audit committee. At its meetings, the audit committee shall be provided with the details of each new, existing, or proposed related party transaction, including the terms of the transaction, any contractual restrictions that the company has already committed to, the business purpose of the transaction, and the benefits of the transaction to the company and to the relevant related party. Any member of the committee who has an interest in the related party transaction under review by the committee shall abstain from voting on the approval of the related party transaction, but may, if so requested by the chairman of the committee, participate in some or all of the committee’s discussions of the related party transaction. Upon completion of its review of the related party transaction, the committee may determine to permit or to prohibit the related party transaction.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The firm of WithumSmith+Brown, PC, or Withum, acts as our independent registered public accounting firm. The following is a summary of fees paid to Withum for services rendered.
Audit Fees.   During the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, fees for our independent registered public accounting firm were approximately $75,000 for the services Withum performed in connection with our Initial Public Offering and the audit of our December 31, 2020 financial statements included in this Report.
Audit-Related Fees.   During the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, our independent registered public accounting firm did not render assurance and related services related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements.
Tax Fees.   During the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, our independent registered public accounting firm did not render services to us for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
All Other Fees.   During the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, there were no fees billed for products and services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm other than those set forth above.

83

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV
ITEM 15.   EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES
(a)   The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K/A:
(1)
Financial Statements:
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules:
None.
(3)
Exhibits
We hereby file as part of this Report the exhibits listed in the attached Exhibit Index. Exhibits which are incorporated herein by reference can be inspected and copied on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
Exhibit
No.
Description
2.1Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 25, 2021, by and among the Company, Merger Sub and Dream Holdings.(2)
3.1Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.**
4.1Warrant Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Company.(1)
4.2
10.1Private Placement Warrants Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between the Company and the Sponsor.(1)
10.2Investment Management Trust Account Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and the Company.(1)
10.3Registration and Shareholder Rights Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between the Company and the Sponsor.(1)
10.4Letter Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between the Company, the Sponsor and each of the officers and directors of the Company.(1)
10.5Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2020, between the Company and the Sponsor.(1)
10.6Promissory Note, dated as August 21, 2020, between the Registrant and the Sponsor.(3)
10.7Securities Subscription Agreement, dated August 21, 2020, between the Registrant and the Sponsor.(3)
10.8
31.1
31.2
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350.*
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. 1350.*
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
*
Filed herewith.
**
Previously filed.

84

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(1)
Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Current Reportactual volatility of several publicly traded companies that are similar to NuScale in its industry sector. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the option valuation model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur. All equity-based payment awards are amortized on Form 8-K, filed witha straight-line basis over the SEC on November 30, 2020.
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2021.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on September 25, 2020.
ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.

85

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d)requisite service periods of the Securities Actawards.

Equity-based compensation is recorded as a general and administrative expense and other expense in the statements of 1934, the registrantoperations.
Segment Information
The Company has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed ondetermined that its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
May 7, 2021
SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.

/s/ Christopher Sorrells
Name:   Christopher Sorrells
Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NamePositionDate
/s/ Christopher Sorrells
Christopher Sorrells
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
May 7, 2021
/s/ Jeffrey Schramm
Jeffrey Schramm
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
May 7, 2021
/s/ William Quinn
William Quinn
Chairman and DirectorMay 7, 2021
/s/ Robert Kaplan
Robert Kaplan
Vice President of Business DevelopmentMay 7, 2021
/s/ Debora Frodl
Debora Frodl
DirectorMay 7, 2021
/s/ Richard Thompson
Richard Thompson
DirectorMay 7, 2021
/s/ Patrick Wood, III
Patrick Wood, III
DirectorMay 7, 2021

86

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Index to Financial Statements
Page
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7

F-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”(“CEO”), as of December 31, 2020, the related statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Restatement of Financial Statements
As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a public statement entitled Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition CompaniesChief Operating Officer (“SPACs”) (the “Public Statement”) on April 12, 2021, which discusses the accounting for certain warrants as liabilities. The Company previously accounted for its warrants as equity instruments. Management evaluated its warrants against the Public Statement, and determined that the warrants should be accounted for as liabilities. Accordingly, the 2020 financial statements have been restated to correct the accounting and related disclosure for the warrants.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”COO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether theits chief operating decision makers (“CODMs”). The CODMs review financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ WithumSmith+Brown, PC
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
New York, New York
May 7, 2021

F-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2020
(Restated)
ASSETS
Cash$1,906,348
Prepaid expenses237,088
Total current assets2,143,436
Investments held in trust account232,301,973
Total assets$234,445,409
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accrued offering costs$49,934
Total current liabilities49,934
Long term liabilities:
Warrant liability33,660,000
Deferred underwriting fee payable8,050,000
Total liabilities41,759,934
Commitments and Contingencies
Class A Common Shares Subject to Redemption, 18,582,720 shares at $10.10 per share187,685,474
Shareholders’ Equity:
Preference shares, $0.0001 par value; 1,000,000 stocks authorized; none issued and outstanding
Class A common share, $0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized;4,417,280 shares issued and outstanding (excluding 18,582,720 shares subject to possible redemption)442
Class B common share, $0.0001 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 5,750,000 shares issued and outstanding575
Additional Paid in Capital17,970,408
Accumulated Deficit(12,971,424)
Total shareholders’ equity5,000,001
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity$234,445,409
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 20, 2020 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2020
(Restated)
Formation and operating costs$114,144
Loss from operations(114,144)
Other income (expense):
Change in fair value of warrant liability(12,110,000)
Offering costs allocated to derivative warrant liabilities(749,253)
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account1,973
Net loss$(12,971,424)
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class A redeemable ordinary shares23,000,000
Basic and diluted net income per ordinary share, Class A$0.00
Weighted average shares outstanding of Class B non-redeemable ordinary shares5,194,656
Basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share, Class B$(2.50)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 20, 2020 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2020
(Restated)
Ordinary SharesSharesAmount
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Class AClass B
SharesAmount
Balance as of August 20, 2020$$$$$
Issuance of Class B ordinary shares to
Sponsor
5,750,00057524,42525,000
Sale of Units in initial public offering,
less fair value of public warrants
23,000,0002,300217,347,700217,350,000
Offering costs(11,718,101)(11,718,101)
Ordinary Shares Subject to possible Redemption(18,582,720)(1,858)(187,683,616)(187,685,474)
Net loss(12,971,424)(12,971,424)
Balance as of December 31,
2020
4,417,280$4425,750,000$575$17,970,408$(12,971,424)$5,000,001
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SPRING VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM AUGUST 20, 2020 (INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2020
(Restated)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Loss$(12,971,424)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liabilities12,110,000
Offering costs allocated to derivative warrant liabilities749,253
Payment of formation costs through issuance of Class B ordinary shares5,000
Interest earned on marketable securities held in Trust Account(1,973)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Prepaid expenses(237,088)
Net cash used in operating activities(346,232)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Investment of cash into Trust Account(232,300,000)
Net cash used in investing activities(232,300,000)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from sale of Units, net of underwriting discounts paid and reimbursements226,150,000
Proceeds from sale of Private Placement Warrants8,900,000
Repayment of promissory note – related party(124,826)
Payment of offering costs(372,594)
Net cash provided by financing activities234,552,580
Net increase in cash1,906,348
Cash – beginning of period
Cash – end of period$1,906,348
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Initial classification of Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption$200,645,178
Change in value of Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemption$(12,959,704)
Warrant liabilities in connection with initial public offering and private placement$22,529,000
Deferred underwriting fee payable$8,050,000
Accrued offering costs$49,934
Offering costs paid by Sponsor in exchange for Founder Shares$20,000
Offering costs paid directly through Note payable$124,826
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
Spring Valley Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) is a blank check company incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company on August 20, 2020. The Company was incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more businesses or entities (a “Business Combination”).
The Company is not limited to a particular industry or sectorinformation presented for purposes of consummating a Business Combination. The Company is an early stageassessing performance and emerging growth company and, as such, the Company is subjectmaking decisions on how to all of the risks associated with early stage and emerging growth companies.
As of December 31, 2020, the Company had not commenced any operations. All activity for the period from August 20, 2020 (inception) through December 31, 2020 relates to the Company’s formation and the initial public offering (“Initial Public Offering”), which is described below. The Company will not generate any operating revenues until after the completion of a Business Combination,allocate resources at the earliest. The Company will generate non-operating income in the form of interest income from the proceeds derived from the Initial Public Offering and will recognize changes in the fair value of warrant liability as other income (expense).overall company level. The Company has selecteddetermined that it currently operates as a single segment, though it will periodically revisit the information used by its CODMs to allocate resources and to manage the operations as it nears commercialization and deployment of its NPMs.
Research and Development
R&D expenses represent costs incurred for designing and engineering products, including the costs of developing design tools. All research and development costs related to product development are expensed as incurred.

Advertising

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are recognized as a component of general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of operations. Advertising costs expensed were approximately $7,340, $2,600 and $1,057 for the years ended December 31, as its fiscal year end.2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The registration statement
Income Taxes

NuScale Corp accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the Company’s Initial Public Offering was declared effective on November 23, 2020. On November 27, 2020,estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the Company consummated the Initial Public Offeringfinancial statement carrying amounts of 23,000,000 units (the “Units” and, with respect to the Class A ordinary shares included in the Units sold, the “Public Shares”) which includes the full exercise by the underwriters of its over-allotment option in the amount of 3,000,000 Units, at $10.00 per Unit, generating gross proceeds of $230,000,000 which is described in Note 3.
Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Company consummated the sale of 8,900,000 warrants (the “Private Placement Warrants”) at a price of $1.00 per Private Placement Warrant in a private placement to Spring Valley Acquisition Sponsor, LLC (the “Sponsor”), generating gross proceeds of $8,900,000, which is described in Note 4.
Offering costs consist of legal, accounting and other costs incurred through the balance sheet date that are directly related to the Initial Public Offering and were charged to shareholders’ equity upon the completion of the Initial Public Offering in November 2020.
Following the closing of the Initial Public Offering, an amount of $232,300,000 from the net proceeds of the sale of the Units in the Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants was placed in a trust account (the “Trust Account”), and invested in U.S. government securities, within the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), with a maturity of 185 days or less, or in any open-ended investment company that holds itself out as a money market fund investing solely in U.S. Treasuries and meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act, as determined by the Company, until the earliest of: (i) the completion of a Business Combination and (ii) the distribution of the funds in the Trust Account to the Company’s shareholders, as described below.
The Company’s management has broad discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the Proposed Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Warrants, although substantially all of the net proceeds are intended to be applied generally toward consummating a Business Combination. The stock exchange listing rules require that the Business Combination must be with one or more operating businesses or assets with a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the assets held in the Trust Account (as defined below) (excluding the amount of any deferred underwriting commission and taxes payable on the income earned on the Trust Account). The Company will only complete a Business Combination if the post-Business Combination company owns or acquires 50% or more of the issued and outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target business sufficient for it not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully effect a Business Combination.
The Company will provide the holders of the public shares (the “Public Shareholders”) with the opportunity to redeem all or a portion of their public shares upon the completion of the Business

F-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Combination, either (i) in connection with a general meeting called to approve the Business Combination or (ii) by means of a tender offer. The decision as to whether the Company will seek shareholder approval of a Business Combination or conduct a tender offer will be made by the Company, solely in its discretion. The Public Shareholders will be entitled to redeem their Public Shares, for an amount equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, including interest (which interest shall be net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then issued and outstanding public shares, subject to certain limitations as described in the prospectus. The per-share amount to be distributed to the Public Shareholders who properly redeem their shares will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions the Company will pay to the underwriters (as discussed in Note 6). There will be no redemption rights upon the completion of a Business Combination with respect to the Company’s warrants.
The Company will proceed with a Business Combination only if the Company has net tangible assets of at least $5,000,001 and, if the Company seeks shareholder approval, it receives an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law approving a Business Combination, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shareholders who attend and vote at a general meeting of the Company. If a shareholder vote is not required and the Company does not decide to hold a shareholder vote for business or other legal reasons, the Company will, pursuant to its Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, conduct the redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and file tender offer documents containing substantially the same information as would be included in a proxy statement with the SEC prior to completing a Business Combination. If the Company seeks shareholder approval in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor has agreed to vote its Founder Shares (as defined in Note 5) and any Public Shares purchased during or after the Proposed Public Offering in favor of approving a Business Combination. Additionally, each Public Shareholder may elect to redeem their Public Shares, without voting, and if they do vote, irrespective of whether they vote for or against a proposed Business Combination.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company seeks shareholder approval of the Business Combination and the Company does not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, a Public Shareholder, together with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group” ​(as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the Public Shares without the Company’s prior written consent.
The Sponsor has agreed (a) to waive its redemption rights with respect to any Founder Shares and Public Shares held by it in connection with the completion of a Business Combination and (b) not to propose an amendment to the Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (i) to modify the substance or timing of the Company’s obligation to allow redemption in connection with the Company’s initial Business Combination or to redeem 100% of the Public Shares if the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period (as defined below) or (ii) with respect to any other provision relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity, unless the Company provides the Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest and other income earned on the Trust account and not previously released to pay taxes, divided by the number of then issued and outstanding Public Shares.
The Company will initially have until May 27, 2022 to consummate a Business Combination. However, if the Company anticipates that it may not be able to consummate a Business Combination by May 27, 2022, it may, by resolution of the board of directors if requested by the Sponsor, extend the initial period of time to consummate a Business Combination one time, by an additional 6 months, subject to the Sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees purchasing additional Private Placement Warrants. The shareholders will not be entitled to vote or redeem their Public Shares in connection with any such extension. In order to extend the initial period of time to consummate a Business Combination for such six-month period, the Sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees, must purchase an additional 2,300,000 Private Placement Warrants at $1.00 per warrant and deposit the $2,300,000 in proceeds into the Trust Account on or prior to May 27, 2022. The Sponsor, its affiliates or permitted designees are not obligated to purchase additional Private Placement Warrants to extend the time for the Company to complete a Business Combination.

F-8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

However, if the Company has not completed a Business Combination within the Combination Period, the Company will (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem 100% of the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned and not previously released to the Company to pay its taxes, if any (less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then issued and outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish the rights of the Public Shareholders as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of the Company’s remaining Public Shareholders and its Board of Directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in each case to the Company’s obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. There will be no redemption rights or liquidating distributions with respect to the Company’s warrants, which will expire worthless if the Company fails to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period.
The Sponsor has agreed to waive its rights to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account with respect to the Founder Shares it will receive if the Company fails to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. However, if the Sponsor or any of its respective affiliates acquire Public Shares, such Public Shares will be entitled to liquidating distributions from the Trust Account if the Company fails to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period. The underwriters have agreed to waive their rights to their deferred underwriting commission (see Note 6) held in the Trust Account in the event the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period, and in such event, such amounts will be included with the other funds held in the Trust Account that will be available to fund the redemption of the Public Shares. In the event of such distribution, it is possible that the per share value of the assets remaining available for distribution will be less than the per share value deposited into the Trust Account.
In order to protect the amounts held in the Trust Account, the Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to the Company if and to the extent any claims by a third party (other than the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm) for services rendered or products sold to the Company, or a prospective target business with which the Company has discussed entering into a transaction agreement, reduce the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of  (1) $10.10 per Public Share and (2) the actual amount per Public Share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, if less than $10.10 per Public Share, due to reductions in the value of trust assets, in each case net of the interest that may be withdrawn to pay taxes. This liability will not apply to any claims by a third party who executed a waiver of any and all rights to seek access to the Trust Account and as to any claims under the Company’s indemnity of the underwriters of the Proposed Public Offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). In the event that an executed waiver is deemed to be unenforceable against a third party, the Sponsor will not be responsible to the extent of any liability for such third-party claims. The Company will seek to reduce the possibility that the Sponsor will have to indemnify the Trust Account due to claims of creditors by endeavoring to have all vendors, service providers (other than the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm), prospective target businesses or other entities with which the Company does business, execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to monies held in the Trust Account.
NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying audited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
Emerging Growth Company
The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage

F-9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of such extended transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, the Company, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard. This may make comparison of the Company’s financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging growth company, which has opted out of using the extended transition period, difficult or impossible because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts ofexisting assets and liabilities and disclosuretheir respective tax bases. In assessing the realizability of contingentdeferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statementsare calculated by applying existing tax laws and the reported amounts of expenses duringrates expected to apply to taxable income in the reporting period.
Making estimates requires managementyears in which those temporary differences are expected to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of thebe recovered or settled. The effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate, could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
Correction of an Error in Previously Issued Financial Statements
In April 2021, the Company concluded that, because of a misapplication of the accounting guidance related to its Publictax rates on deferred tax assets and Private Placement warrants the Company issued in November 2020, the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the Affected Periods should no longer be relied upon. As such, the Companyliabilities is restating its financial statements for the Affected Periods included in this Annual Report.
On April 12, 2021, the Staff of the SEC issued a statement entitled “Staff Statement on Accounting and Reporting Considerations for Warrants Issued by Special Purpose Acquisition Companies.” In the statement, the SEC Staff, among other things, highlighted potential accounting implications of certain terms that are ordinary in warrants issued in connection with the initial public offerings of special purpose acquisition companies such as the Company. As a result of the Staff statement and in light of evolving views as to certain provisions ordinarily included in warrants issued by special purpose acquisition companies, the Company’s management re-evaluated the accounting for our Warrants under ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging — Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, and concluded that they do not meet the criteria to be classified in shareholders’ equity. Since the Warrants meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40, the Company has restated the financial statements to classify the Warrants as liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value, with subsequent changes in their respective fair values recognized in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) at each reporting date.
The Company’s prior accounting treatment for the Warrants was equity classification rather than as derivative liabilities. Accounting for the Warrants as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815-40 requires that the Company re-measure the Warrants to their fair value each reporting period and record the changes in such

F-10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

value in the statement of operations. Accordingly, the Company has restated the value and classificationyear of the Warrants in our financial statements included herein (“Restatement”).enacted rate change.
The following summarizes the effect of the Restatement on each financial statement line item for each period presented herein and as of the date of the Company’s consummation of its IPO.
As of
December 31, 2020
As ReportedAs RestatedDifference
Balance Sheet
Derivative warrant liabilities$$33,660,000$33,660,000
Total Liabilities8,099,93441,759,93433,660,000
Class A ordinary shares subject to possible
redemption
221,345,469187,685,474(33,659,995)
Class A ordinary shares, $0.0001 par value108442334
Additional paid-in capital5,111,49417,970,40812,858,914
Accumulated deficit(112,171)(12,971,424)(12,859,253)
Total Shareholders’ Equity5,000,0015,000,001
For the Period from August 20, 2020
Through December 31, 2020
As ReportedAs RestatedDifference
Statements of Operations
Change in value of derivative warrant liabilities$$(12,110,000)$(12,110,000)
Offering costs allocated to derivative warrant liabilities(749,253)(749,253)
Net loss$(112,171)$(12,971,424)$(12,859,253)
Per Share Data:
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share, Class A$$$
Basic and diluted net less per share, Class B$(0.02)$(2.50)$(2.48)
In addition, the impact to the balance sheet dated November 27, 2020, filed on Form 8-K on December 3, 2020 related to the impact of accounting for public and private warrants as liabilities at fair value resulted in approximately a $22.5 million increase to the warrant liabilities line item at November 27, 2020 and offsetting decrease to the Class A common stock subject to redemption mezzanine equity line item. There is no change to total stockholders’ equity at any reported balance sheet date.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company had $1,659,434 in cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020.
Class A Ordinary Shares Subject to Possible Redemption
The Company accounts for its Class A ordinary shares subject to possible redemptionuncertainty in accordance with the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.” Ordinary shares subject to mandatory redemption is classified as a liability instrument and is measured at fair value. Conditionally redeemable ordinary shares (including ordinary shares that features redemption rights that is either within the control of the holder or subject to redemption upon the occurrence of uncertain events not solely within the Company’s control) is classified as temporary equity. At all other times, ordinary shares are classified as shareholders’ equity. The Company’s Class A ordinary shares feature certain redemption rights that are considered to be outside of the Company’s control and subject to occurrence of uncertain future events. Accordingly, at December 31, 2020, the 18,582,720 shares of Class A

F-11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ordinary shares subject to possible redemption are presented as temporary equity, outside of the shareholders’ equity section of the Company’s balance sheet.
Derivative Warrant Liabilities
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including issued stock purchase warrants, to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives, pursuant to ASC 480 and ASC 815-15. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period.
The Company issued 11,500,000 warrants as part of the units offered in its Initial Public Offering and, simultaneously with the closing of Initial Public Offering, the Company issued in a private placement an aggregate of 8,900,000 private placement warrants. The Company accounts for the Warrants in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815-40-15-7D and 7F under which the Warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as liabilities. Accordingly, the Company classifies the Warrants as liabilities at their fair value and adjusts the warrants to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is subject to re-measurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in the Company's statement of operations. The fair value of the Public Warrants has been estimated using the Public Warrants' quoted market price. The Private Placement Warrants are valued using a Modified Black Scholes Option Pricing Model.
Offering Costs
Offering costs consist of legal, accounting, underwriting fees and other costs incurred through the Initial Public Offering that are directly related to the Initial Public Offering. Upon the completion of the Initial Public Offering on November 27, 2020, the offering costs were allocated between shareholders' equity and statement of operations with $749,253 being expensed based on fair value of warrant liabilities relative to Initial Public Offering proceeds.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which prescribesusing a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement ofthreshold for tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefitsreturn, which are subject to be recognized, aexamination by federal and state taxing authorities. The tax benefit from an uncertain tax position must beis recognized when it is more likely than not tothat the position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities.authorities based on technical merits of the position. The Company’s management determined thatamount of the Cayman Islandstax benefit recognized is the Company’s majorlargest amount of the benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The effective tax jurisdiction. Therate and the tax basis of assets and liabilities reflect management’s estimates of the ultimate outcome of various tax uncertainties. Once identified, the Company recognizes accruedwill recognize penalties and interest and penalties related to unrecognizeduncertain tax benefitspositions within the provision (benefit) for income taxes line in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

NuScale LLC is a limited liability company treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax expense. As of December 31, 2020, there were no unrecognized tax benefits and no amounts accrued for interest and penalties. The Companypurposes that is currently not aware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals or material deviation from its position.
The Company is considered to be an exempted Cayman Islands company with no connection to any other taxable jurisdiction and is presently not subject to U.S. federal income taxestax. As such, its net taxable income or incomeloss and any related tax filing requirementscredits are allocated to its members.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

F-15


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
The Company considers the applicability and impact of all Accounting Standards Updates issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). There are no accounting pronouncements which have been issued but are not yet effective that would have a material impact on our current financial statements.
4. Equity and Loss Per Share
Noncontrolling Interests

Following the Transaction, holders of Class A common stock own direct controlling interest in the Cayman Islands orresults of the United States. As such,combined entity, while the Company’s tax provision was zeroLegacy NuScale Equityholders own an economic interest in NuScale LLC, shown as noncontrolling interests (“NCI”) in equity in NuScale Corp’s consolidated financial statements. The indirect economic interests are held by Legacy NuScale Equityholders in the form of NuScale LLC Class B units. The following table summarizes the economic interests of NuScale Corp between the holders of Class A common stock and indirect economic interests held by NuScale LLC Class B unitholders as of and for the period presented.from May 2, 2022 through December 31, 2022:
Net
F-16


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
As of and for the period from May 2, 2022 through
December 31, 2022
NuScale Corp Class A common stock
Beginning of period41,971,380 
Conversion of combined interests into Class A common stock21,305,891 
Exercise of options and warrants4,431,824 
Vesting of earn out shares1,643,924 
End of period69,353,019 
NuScale LLC Class B units (NCI)
Beginning of period178,396,711 
Conversion of combined interests into Class A common stock(21,305,891)
End of period157,090,820 
Total
Beginning of period220,368,091 
Conversion of combined interests into Class A common stock— 
Exercise of options and warrants4,431,824 
Vesting of earn out shares1,643,924 
End of period226,443,839 
Ownership Percentage
NuScale Corp Class A common stock
Beginning of period19.0 %
End of period30.6 %
NuScale LLC Class B units (NCI)
Beginning of period81.0 %
End of period69.4 %
The NCI may decrease according to the number of shares of Class B common stock and NuScale LLC Class B units that are exchanged for shares of Class A common stock or, in certain circumstances including at the election of NuScale Corp, cash in an amount equal to the fair value of Class A common stock received in a contemporaneous equity issuance. After each exchange, NuScale LLC equity attributable to NuScale Corp is rebalanced to reflect the change in ownership percentage, which is calculated above based on Class B units and Class A shares, as a percentage of combined interests.

The earn out shares associated with the merger became vested during 2022, as the VWAP of the Company’s share price exceeded $12.00 and then $14.00 for the required time period. These Class A shares are now outstanding and included in our weighted-average shares calculation.

Members’ Equity of NuScale LLC

F-17


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
Prior to the Transaction, NuScale LLC issued equity consisting of common units and convertible preferred units (“CPU”s). Each common unit was entitled to one vote, while holders of CPUs had voting rights equivalent to the number of CPUs held multiplied by a common equivalent ratio, as defined, which was set at 100% at the time of the Company’s recapitalization in 2011. The CPUs had a 10.0% cumulative preferred return per year compounded quarterly on the unreturned preferred capital, beginning on the date such CPU was issued. In addition, as discussed further in note 9, NuScale LLC had mezzanine equity.

As consideration for the reverse recapitalization, 178,396,711 shares of NuScale Corp’s Class B common stock were issued. Simultaneously, all NuScale LLC units and CPUs outstanding were reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in capital at carrying value, including NuScale LLC units previously presented as mezzanine equity. In addition, the accumulated preferred return was nullified upon conversion.

Loss Per Ordinary Share
Net
Prior to the Transaction, the membership structure of NuScale LLC included units that had profit interests. The Company analyzed the calculation of net loss per unit for periods prior to the Transaction and determined that it resulted in values that would not be meaningful to the readers of these financial statements. Therefore, net loss per unit information has not been presented for periods prior to May 2, 2022.

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss bybased on the weighted average number of ordinary shares issued andof Class A common stock outstanding during the period, excluding ordinary shares subject to forfeiture. The Company has not considered the effect of warrants sold in the Initial Public Offering and private placement to purchase Class A ordinary shares in the calculation of diluted income (loss)period. Diluted loss per share since the exercise of the warrants are contingent upon the occurrence of future events and the inclusion of such warrants would be anti-dilutive.
The Company’s statement of operations include a presentation of income (loss) per share for ordinary shares subject to possible redemption in a manner similar to the two-class method of income (loss) per share.

F-12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Net income per ordinary share, basic and diluted, for Class A redeemable ordinary shares is calculated by dividing the interest income earnedbased on the Trust Account, by the weighted average number of shares of Class A redeemable ordinary shares outstanding since original issuance. Net losscommon stock used for the basic earnings per ordinary share basic and diluted, for Class B non-redeemable ordinary shares is calculated by dividing the net loss,calculation, adjusted for incomethe dilutive effect of RSUs, Stock Options, Warrants and Earn Out Shares, if any, using the “treasury stock” method and for all other interests that convert into potential shares of Class A common stock, if any, using the “if converted” method. Net loss attributable to Class A redeemable ordinary shares,common stockholders for diluted loss per share is adjusted for the Company’s share of NuScale LLC’s net loss, net of applicable franchise and incomeNuScale Corp taxes, by the weighted average numberafter giving effect to all other interests that convert into potential shares of Class B non-redeemable ordinary shares outstandingA common stock, to the extent it is dilutive. In addition, net loss attributable to Class A common stockholders for diluted loss per share is adjusted for the period. Class B non-redeemable ordinary shares includesafter-tax impact of changes to the Founder Shares as these shares do not have any redemption features and do not participate infair value of warrant liabilities, to the income earned onextent the Trust Account.Company’s Warrants are dilutive.

The following table reflectssets forth the calculationcomputation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per ordinary share (in dollars, exceptloss per share of Class A common stock and represents the period from May 2, 2022 to December 31, 2022, the period where the Company had Class A and Class B common stock outstanding. Class B common stock represents a right to cast one vote per share at the NuScale Corp level, and carry no economic rights, including rights to dividends or distributions upon liquidation, and as a result, is not considered a participating security for basic and diluted loss per share. As such, basic and diluted loss per share of Class B common stock has not been presented.
May 2, 2022 Through December 31, 2022
Net loss attributable to Class A common stockholders$(25,914)
Weighted-average shares for basic and diluted loss per share50,763,844 
Basic and Diluted loss per share of Class A common stock$(0.51)
Anti-dilutive securities excluded from shares outstanding:
Class B common shares157,090,820 
Stock options12,224,783 
Warrants18,458,703 
Time-based RSUs2,140,651 
Total189,914,957 


5. Warrant Liabilities
F-18


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts):
FOR THE PERIOD FROM
AUGUST 20, 2020 (Inception)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31,
2020
Redemable Class A Ordinary Shares
Numerator: Earnings allocable to Redeemable Class A Ordinary Shares
Interest Income$1,973
Income and Franchise Tax-
Net Earnings$1,973
Denominator: Weighted Average Redeemable class A Ordinary Shares
Redeemable Class A Common Stock, Basic and Diluted23,000,000
Earnings/Basic and Diluted Redeemable Class A Ordinary Shares$0.00
Non-Redeemable Class B Ordinary Shares
Numerator: Net Loss minus Redeemable Net Earnings
Net Loss$(12,971,424)
Redeemable Net Earnings(1,973)
Non-Redeemable Net Loss$(12,973,397)
Denominator: Weighted Average Non-Redeemable Class B Ordinary Shares
Non-Redeemable Class B Ordinary Shares, Basic and Diluted5,194,656
Loss/Basic and Diluted Non-Redeemable Class B Ordinary Shares$(2.50)
Note: As of December 31, 2020, basic and diluted shares are the same as there are no non-redeemable securities that are dilutive to the Company’s stockholders
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject2022, the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist of a cash account in a financial institution, which, at times, may exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Coverage of $250,000. The Company has not experienced losses on this accounthad 9,558,703 Public Warrants and management believes the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such account.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities reflects management’s estimate of amounts that the Company would have received in connection with the sale of the assets or paid in connection with the transfer of the liabilities in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In connection with measuring the fair value of its assets and liabilities, the Company seeks to maximize the use of observable inputs (market data obtained from independent sources) and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (internal assumptions about how market participants would price assets and liabilities). The following fair value hierarchy is used to classify assets and liabilities based on the observable inputs and unobservable inputs used in order to value the assets and liabilities:

F-13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. An active market for an asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 inputs. Examples of Level 2 inputs include quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities and quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs based on our assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Recent Accounting Standards
Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
NOTE 3 — INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING
Pursuant to the Initial Public Offering, the Company sold 23,000,000 Units, which includes a full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option in the amount of 3,000,000 Units, at a purchase price of $10.00 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one Class A ordinary share and one-half of one redeemable warrant (“Public Warrant”). Each whole Public Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one Class A ordinary share at an exercise price of $11.50 per whole share (see Note 7).
NOTE 4 — PRIVATE PLACEMENT
Simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering, the Sponsor purchased an aggregate of 8,900,000 Private Placement Warrants at a price of $1.00 per Private Placement Warrant, for an aggregate purchase price of $8,900,000. Each Private Placement Warrant is exercisable to purchase one Class A ordinary share at a price of $11.50 per share, subject to adjustment (see Note 7). A portion ofoutstanding. For the proceedsperiod from the Private PlacementMay 2, 2022 through December 31, 2022, 1,941,297 Public Warrants were added to the proceeds from the Initial Public Offering held in the Trust Account. If the Company does not complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period, the proceeds from the sale of the Private Placement Warrants will be used to fund the redemption of the Public Shares (subject to the requirements of applicable law) and the Private Placement Warrants will expire worthless.
NOTE 5 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Founder Shares
On August 21, 2020, the Sponsor paid $25,000 to the Company in consideration for 7,187,500 Class B ordinary shares (the “Founder Shares”). In September 2020, the Sponsor transferred 40,000 Founder Shares to each of the Company’s directors (120,000 shares in total). On October 22, 2020, the Sponsor effected a surrender of 1,437,500 Founder Shares to the Company for no consideration, resulting in 5,750,000 Founder Shares outstanding. The Sponsor transferred all of the Founder Shares owned by the Sponsor to SV Acquisition Sponsor Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Sponsor (“Holdco”), prior to the closing of the Initial Public Offering. The Founder Shares included an aggregate of up to 750,000 shares that were subject to forfeiture depending on the extent to which the underwriters’ over-allotment option was exercised, so that the number of Founder Shares would equal, on an as-converted basis, approximately 20% of the Company’s issued and outstanding ordinary shares after the Initial Public Offering. As a result of the underwriters’ election to fully exercise their over-allotment option, a total of 750,000 Founder Shares are no longer subject to forfeiture.
The Sponsor has agreed, subject to limited exceptions, not to transfer, assign or sell any of the Founder Shares until the earliest of: (A) one year after the completion of a Business Combination and (B) subsequent to a Business Combination, (x) if the closing price of the Class A ordinary shares equals or exceeds $12.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share dividends, rights issuances, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period commencing at least

F-14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

150 days after a Business Combination, or (y) the date on which the Company completes a liquidation, merger, share exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of the Public Shareholders having the right to exchange their Class A ordinary sharesexchanged for cash securities or other property.of $22,325.
Administrative Support Agreement
Commencing on November 23, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to pay an affiliate of the Sponsor up to $10,000 per month for office space, secretarial and administrative services. Upon completion of a Business Combination or its liquidation, the Company will cease paying these monthly fees. As of December 31, 2020, no fees have been incurred related to the agreement.
Promissory Note — Related Party
On August 21, 2020, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) to the Sponsor, pursuant to which the Company could borrow up to an aggregate principal amount of $300,000. The Promissory Note was non-interest bearing and payable on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) the completion of the Initial Public Offering. The Company borrowed $124,826 through the IPO date and repaid the Note prior to December 31, 2020.
Related Party Loans
In order to finance transaction costs in connection with a Business Combination, the Sponsor or an affiliate of the Sponsor or certain of the Company’s directors and officers may, but are not obligated to, loan the Company funds as may be required (“Working Capital Loans”). If the Company completes a Business Combination, the Company would repay the Working Capital Loans out of the proceeds of the Trust Account released to the Company. Otherwise, the Working Capital Loans would be repaid only out of funds held outside the Trust Account. In the event that a Business Combination does not close, the Company may use a portion of proceeds held outside the Trust Account to repay the Working Capital Loans, but no proceeds held in the Trust Account would be used to repay the Working Capital Loans. Except for the foregoing, the terms of such Working Capital Loans, if any, have not been determined and no written agreements exist with respect to such loans. The Working Capital Loans would either be repaid upon consummation of a Business Combination, without interest, or, at the lender’s discretion, up to $1,500,000 of such Working Capital Loans may be convertible into warrants of the post-Business Combination entity at a price of $1.00 per warrant. The warrants would be identical to the Private Placement Warrants. As of December 31, 2020, there were no Working Capital Loans outstanding.
NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Risks and Uncertainties
Management continues to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 global pandemic on the industry and has concluded that while it is reasonably possible that the virus could have a negative effect on the Company’s financial position, its results of operations and/or search for a target company, the specific impact is not readily determinable as of the date of these financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Registration and Shareholders Rights
Pursuant to a registration and shareholders rights agreement entered into on November 23, 2020, the holders of the Founder Shares, Private Placement Warrants and any warrants that may be issued upon conversion of Working Capital Loans (and any Class A ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants and warrants that may be issued upon conversion of the Working Capital Loans) are entitled to registration rights. The holders of a majority of these securities are entitled to make up to three demands, excluding short form demands, that the Company register such securities. In addition, the holders have certain “piggy-back” registration rights with respect to registration statements filed subsequent to completion of a Business Combination. However, the registration and shareholder rights agreement provides that the Company will not permit any registration statement filed under the Securities Act to become effective until termination of the applicable lockup period. The registration and shareholder rights

F-15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

agreement does not contain liquidating damages or other cash settlement provisions resulting from delays in registering the Company’s securities. The Company will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the filing of any such registration statements.
Underwriting Agreement
The underwriter is entitled to a deferred fee of $0.35 per Unit, or $8,050,000 in the aggregate. The deferred fee will become payable to the underwriter from the amounts held in the Trust Account solely in the event that the Company completes a Business Combination, subject to the terms of the underwriting agreement. In addition, the underwriters reimbursed the Company an aggregate of $750,000 for costs incurred in connection with the Initial Public Offering.
Anchor Investments
Certain qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors not affiliated with any member of the Company’s management (the “anchor investors”) purchased 1,980,000 Units each in the Initial Public Offering and the Company directed the underwriters to sell to the anchor investors such number of Units. Further, each of the anchor investors entered into a separate agreement with the Sponsor pursuant to which each such investor purchased membership interests in Holdco representing an indirect beneficial interest in up to 142,187 Founder Shares upon the closing of the Initial Public Offering for up to $494.56.
NOTE 7 — SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preference Shares — The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 preference shares with a par value of $0.0001 per share, with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Company’s board of directors. At December 31, 2020, there were no preference shares issued or outstanding.
Class A Ordinary Shares — The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 Class A ordinary shares, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of Class A ordinary shares are entitled to one vote for each share. At December 31, 2020, there were 4,417,280 Class A ordinary shares issued or outstanding, excluding 18,582,720 of Class A ordinary shares subject to redemption.
Class B Ordinary Shares — The Company is authorized to issue 30,000,000 Class B ordinary shares, with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Holders of the Class B ordinary shares are entitled to one vote for each share. At December 31, 2020, there were 5,750,000 Class B ordinary shares issued and outstanding.
Holders of Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares will vote together as a single class on all other matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, except as required by law.
The Class B ordinary shares will automatically convert into Class A ordinary shares at the time of a Business Combination or earlier at the option of the holders thereof at a ratio such that the number of Class A ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of all Founder Shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted basis, 20% of the sum of  (i) the total number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding upon completion of the Proposed Public Offering, plus (ii) the total number of Class A ordinary shares issued or deemed issued or issuable upon conversion or exercise of any equity-linked securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the Company in connection with or in relation to the consummation of a Business Combination, excluding any Class A ordinary shares or equity-linked securities exercisable for or convertible into Class A ordinary shares issued, deemed issued, or to be issued, to any seller in a Business Combination and any Private
Placement Warrants issued to the Sponsor, its affiliates or any member of the Company’s management team upon conversion of Working Capital Loans. In no event will the Class B ordinary shares convert into Class A ordinary shares at a rate of less than one-to-one.
NOTE 8 — WARRANT LIABILITY
Public Warrants may only be exercised for a whole number of shares.shares at a price of $11.50. No fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the Public Warrants. The Public Warrants will becomeare currently exercisable on the later of 

F-16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(a) 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination and (b) one year from the closing of the Proposed Public Offering. The Public Warrants will expire five years from the completiondate of a Business Combinationthe Transaction or earlier upon redemption or liquidation.
The Company will not be obligated to deliver any Class A ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of a warrant and will have no obligation to settle such warrant exercise unless a registration statement under the Securities Act with respect to the Class A ordinary shares underlying the warrants is then effective and a prospectus relating thereto is current, subject to the Company satisfying its obligations with respect to registration, or a valid exemption from registration is available. No warrant will be exercisable and the Company will not be obligated to issue a Class A ordinary share upon exercise of a warrant unless the Class A ordinary share issuable upon such warrant exercise has been registered, qualified or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of the registered holder of the warrants.
The Company has agreed that as soon as practicable, but in no event later than 20 business days, after the closing of a Business Combination, it will use its commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement for the registration, under the Securities Act, of the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, and the Company will use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60 business days after the closing of a Business Combination, and to maintain the effectiveness of such registration statement and a current prospectus relating to those Class A ordinary shares until the warrants expire or are redeemed, as specified in the warrant agreement; provided that if the Class A ordinary shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of a “covered security” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, the Company may, at its option, require holders of Public Warrants who exercise their warrants to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act and, in the event the Company so elects, the Company will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration statement, but it will use its commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available. If a registration statement covering the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not effective by the 60th day after the closing of a Business Combination, warrant holders may, until such time as there is an effective registration statement and during any period when the Company will have failed to maintain an effective registration statement, exercise warrants on a “cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption, but the Company will use its commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares under applicable blue sky laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
Redemption of warrantsWarrants when the price per share of Class A ordinary sharecommon stock equals or exceeds $18.00.   Once the warrants become exercisable, the$18.00. The Company may redeem the outstanding warrantsWarrants (except as described with respect to the Private Placement Warrants):

in whole and not in part;

at a price of $0.01 per warrant;Warrant;

upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each warrantWarrant holder; and

if, and only if the closing price of the Class A ordinary sharescommon stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted) for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending three trading days before the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrantWarrant holders.

If and when the warrantsWarrants become redeemable by the Company, the Company may exercise its redemption right even if it is unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws.

Redemption of warrantsWarrants when the price per share of Class A ordinary sharecommon stock equals or exceeds $10.00. Once the warrants become exercisable, theThe Company may redeem the outstanding warrants:

in whole and not in part;

at $0.10 per warrantWarrant upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption provided that holders will be able to exercise their warrantsWarrants on a cashless basis prior to redemption and receive that number of shares determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of the Class A ordinary shares;common stock;

F-17

TABLE OF CONTENTS


if, and only if, the closing price of the Class A ordinary shares equalcommon stock equals or exceeds $10.00 per public share (as adjusted) for any 20 trading days within the 30-trading day period ending three trading days before the Company sendsends the notice of redemption to the warrantWarrant holders; and

if the closing price of the Class A ordinary sharescommon stock for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrantWarrant holders is less than $18.00 per share (as adjusted), the Private Placement Warrants must also be concurrently called for redemption on the same terms as the outstanding Public Warrants, as described above.Warrants.

If the Company calls the Public Warrants for redemption, as described above, its management will have the option to require any holder that wishes to exercise the Public Warrants to do so on a “cashless basis,” as described in the warrant agreement. The exercise price and number of ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the Public Warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a share dividend, extraordinary dividend or recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, except as described below, the Public Warrants will not be adjusted for issuances of ordinary shares at a price below its exercise price. Additionally, in no event will the Company be required to net cash settle the Public Warrants. If the Company is unable to complete a Business Combination within the Combination Period and the Company liquidates the funds held in the Trust Account, holders of Public Warrants will not receive any of such funds with respect to their Public Warrants, nor will they receive any distribution from the Company’s assets held outside of the Trust Account with respect to such Public Warrants. Accordingly, the Public Warrants may expire worthless.
In addition, if  (x) the Company issues additional Class A ordinary shares or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of a Business Combination at an issue price or effective issue price of less than $9.20 per Class A ordinary share (with such issue price or effective issue price to be determined in good faith by the Company’s board of directors and, in the case of any such issuance to the Sponsor or its affiliates, without taking into account any Founder Shares held by the Sponsor or such affiliates, as applicable, prior to such issuance) (the “Newly Issued Price”), (y) the aggregate gross proceeds from such issuances represent more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest thereon, available for the funding of a Business Combination
Beginning on the date of30th day following the consummation of a Business Combination (net of redemptions), and (z)Transaction, the volume weighted average trading price of its Class A ordinary shares during the 20 trading day period starting on the trading day prior to the day on which the Company consummates its Business Combination (such price, the “Market Value”) is below $9.20 per share, the exercise price of the warrants will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, the $18.00 per share redemption trigger price will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price, and the $10.00 per share redemption trigger price will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price.
The Private Placement Warrants will bebecame almost identical to the Public Warrants underlying the Units being sold in the ProposedSpring Valley Initial Public Offering, except that the Private Placement Warrants and the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of the Private Placement Warrants will not be transferable, assignable or salable until 30 days after the completion of a Business Combination, subject to certain limited exceptions.Offering. Additionally, the Private Placement Warrants will beare exercisable on a cashless basis and beare non-redeemable, except as described above, so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees. If the Private Placement Warrants are held by someone other than the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees, the Private Placement Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.
NOTE 9 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company classifies its U.S. Treasury and equivalent securities as held-to-maturity in accordance with ASC Topic 320 “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities.” Held-to-maturity securities are those securities which the Company has the ability and intent to hold until maturity. Held-to-maturity treasury securities are recorded at amortized cost on the accompanying balance sheet and adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts.
6.Fair Value Measurement

F-18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2020 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation inputs the Company utilized to determine such fair value:
AssetLevelFair Value
December 31, 2020U.S. Treasury Securities Money Market Fund1232,301,973
TheOur Warrants are accounted for as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815-40 and are measured at fair value as of each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of the Warrants are recorded in the statement of operations each period. Due to the similarity of the features of the Public and Private Warrants, management has concluded that the price of the Public Warrants would be used in the valuation of the Private Placement Warrants. However, since the two types of Warrants are not identical and the Private Warrants are not actively traded, we have classified the Private Placement Warrants as Level 2, while the Public Warrants are classified as Level 1.

F-19


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
The following table presents our fair value hierarchy forrepresents the Company’s financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2021:2022:
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Warrant liabilities:
Public Warrants$18,975,000$ —$$18,975,000
Private Placement Warrants14,685,00014,685,000
Total warrant liabilities$18,975,000$0$14,685,000$33,660,000

(in thousands)Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Warrant Liabilities:
Public Warrants$15,198 $— $— $15,198 
Private Placement Warrants— 14,151 — 14,151 
Total Warrant Liabilities as of December 31, 2022$15,198 $14,151 $— $29,349 
7.Accounts and Other Receivables
Accounts and other receivables include reimbursement requests outstanding from the DOE awards, interest receivable and commercial accounts receivable associated with other federal projects. The DOE reimbursement requests are recognized as eligible costs are incurred. At December 31, 2021, accounts receivable are presented net of $10,237 of related deferred DOE cost share liabilities that have the right of offset. As of December 31, 2022, there were no amounts required to be offset. Reimbursement under the awards is recognized as award funds are obligated, and are included in Department of Energy Cost Share in the consolidated statement of operations. Interest receivable of $1,021 was outstanding at December 31, 2022.

The Private Placement Warrants weremajority of our receivables are either due from the U.S. federal government or have to do with a federal project. For these reasons, all receivables are deemed to be fully collectible and no allowance has been recorded. Further, in January 2023, the DOE increased its funds obligation to us by $15,000.
8. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:
20222021
Furniture and fixtures$173 $173 
Office and computer equipment7,393 5,638 
Software13,864 15,227 
Test equipment347 347 
Leasehold improvements2,312 2,689 
24,089 24,074 
Less: Accumulated depreciation(19,431)(20,632)
Add: Assets under development112 1,518 
Net property, plant and equipment$4,770 $4,960 
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $2,521, $2,018 and $1,900, respectively. Depreciation in the amount of $770 and $1,751 is included in G&A expenses and Other expense, respectively, for the 2022 fiscal year, $876 and $1,142, respectively, for the 2021 fiscal year and $1,015 and $885, respectively, for the 2020 fiscal year.
9. Intangible Assets and Redeemable Common Units
In 2007, NuScale entered into a patent license agreement (the “Agreement”) with OSU, which granted the Company a worldwide, exclusive license under three patents. In 2015, NuScale entered into a “Purchase, Sale and License Agreement” (“PLA”) with OSU, whereby OSU sold and assigned to NuScale certain patent and intellectual property rights, including the patent intellectual property rights that OSU formerly exclusively and non-exclusively licensed to NuScale
F-20


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
under the Agreement; and granted NuScale a license to use, reproduce, prepare derivative works of, distribute, transmit, publicly perform and publicly display the testing data.
As consideration of this purchase, NuScale issued a cash payment of $1,000 upon execution of the agreement as well as on-going $25 quarterly cash payments continuing until the earlier of (i) such time as NuScale completes the sale of its first commercial-scale nuclear module (exclusive of modules designated to validate the operability of a NuScale module) to a commercial customer or (ii) expiration of the term of the last valid claim under the assigned patents to expire. Additionally, NuScale will make royalty payments to OSU on the sale of NuScale’s first and subsequent commercial-scale nuclear modules to a commercial customer as follows:
0.25% of the then current commercial price paid to NuScale for the first twenty-four (24) NuScale modules sold to commercial customers.
0.15% of the then current commercial price paid to NuScale for the next twelve (12) NuScale modules sold to commercial customers.
Under the initial PLA, the Company granted OSU 2,750,000 NuScale LLC common units valued usingat a Black Scholes Model,weighted average price per unit of $0.25 determined on their respective grant date. Additionally, under the updated agreement, NuScale granted OSU 3,250,000 NuScale LLC common units valued at $0.45 per unit on the grant date, resulting (in addition to the cash payment of $1,000) in a value assigned to the patents of $2,462 which is consideredbeing amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the patents which is estimated to be through 2034. The gross carrying amount of the patents, and the associated accumulated amortization was $2,462 and $1,403, respectively, at December 31, 2022 and $2,462 and $1,226, respectively, at December 31, 2021. Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding years is expected to be $177 per year.
Accordingly, as of December 31, 2021, the 6,000,000 NuScale LLC common units subject to possible redemption are presented as mezzanine equity, outside of Member’s Equity. Upon consummation of the Transaction, these 6,000,000 NuScale LLC common units were converted into NuScale Corp Class B common stock and are now included in Stockholders’ Equity.
Commencing on the effective date of the agreement and continuing until such time as NuScale completes the sale of its first commercial-scale nuclear module to a Level 3 faircommercial customer, OSU shall have the right, but not the obligation, to sell all of its then current common share holdings in NuScale Holdings and all of its then current common stock in NuScale Corp (collectively the “NuScale Shares”) to NuScale if, but only if, the NRC issues a written determination that : (a) OSU’s ownership of the NuScale Shares creates a conflict of interest for OSU; and (b) OSU must divest the entirety of such NuScale Shares in order to continue performing work on NuScale’s behalf for certification of the NuScale reactor design. In the event OSU exercises such option, the parties shall enter into a Share Purchase and Sale Agreement, in form and substance reasonably acceptable to each party, pursuant to which OSU would agree to sell and NuScale would agree to purchase all of the NuScale Shares for a price equal to the then current market value measurement.of the NuScale Shares.
At issuance
As of December 31,
2020
Exercise price$11.50$11.50
IPO price$10.00$10.00
Implied stock price range (or underlying asset price at December 31, 2020)$9.35 – $9.66$10.12
Volatility14% – 23%21%
Term5.755.70
Risk-free rate0.46%0.46%
Dividend yield0.0%0.0%
Payments made to OSU for research and testing were $959, $893 and $1,104 for years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amounts payable to OSU included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet were $150 and $186 at December 31, 2021 and 2020, while no amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
F-21


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
10. Leases
Balance SheetAs of December 31,
Lease Assets and LiabilitiesClassification20222021
Right-of-use Assets
Operating lease assetsOther assets$3,870 $1,268 
Total right-of-use assets3,870 1,268 
Lease Liabilities
Operating lease liabilities, currentOther accrued liabilities1,568 1,190 
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrentNoncurrent liabilities2,786 211 
Total lease liabilities$4,354 $1,401 

Supplemental information related to the Company’s leases follows:
As of December 31,
20222021
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating leases$— $— 
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases2.74 years1.05 years
Weighted average discount rate-operating leases4.92 %3.35 %
The following table presentsremaining lease payments under the changesCompany’s leases follows:

Year ended December 31,Operating Leases
2023$1,741 
20241,555 
20251,341 
202618 
Total lease payments$4,655 
Less: interest(301)
Present value of lease liabilities$4,354 

Lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $2,063, $1,695 and $1,874, respectively. Of these amounts $1,851, $1,505 and $1,578 consist of operating lease costs for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 while $212, $190 and $296 account for short-term lease costs for the same time period.
11. Notes Payable
Convertible Note Payable:
In September 2011, NuScale signed a convertible loan agreement with Fluor in the fair valueamount of warrant liabilities:$10,281 with a maturity date of September 30, 2013. The loan had been extended annually and was due on June 30, 2022. The debt was convertible at Fluor’s option at the original issue price per unit of the Company’s next round of financing securities amounting to no less than $16,000.
Private
Placement
Public
Warrant
Liabilities
Initial measurement on November 27, 2020$9,879,000$12,650,000$22,529,000
Change in valuation inputs or other assumptions(1)
4,806,0006,325,00011,131,000
Fair value as of December 31, 2020$14,685,000$18,975,000$33,660,000
At December 31, 2021, the convertible debt outstanding was $14,041, comprised of the original borrowing of $11,331 less the amortized premium of $1,050 plus accrued interest of $3,760.
F-22

(1)

DueNuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the useConsolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
In April 2022, Fluor elected to convert all of quoted pricesits outstanding debt, totaling $14,181, into 8,257,560 NuScale LLC units (which then converted into NuScale LLC Class B units and non-economic voting shares of NuScale Corp Class B common stock in the Merger) at a price per unit of $9.91, which is equivalent to the PIPE price per unit received in conjunction with the Transaction.
Other Notes Payable
In January 2021, NuScale signed a Line of Credit Promissory Note (“LOC”) with Fluor allowing the Company to borrow funds in a series of draws up to a total principal sum of $30,000. NuScale was required to pay all unpaid amounts of principal and interest on the earlier of August 31, 2021 or the date by which the Company raised an active market (Level 1)aggregate of $40,000 or greater from the sale of preferred equity to measureone or more investors. This agreement was later extended through December 31, 2021.

In April 2021, the Company used a portion of the proceeds received from a preferred units purchase agreement to pay all outstanding principal and interest and retire a promissory note entered into in 2020.

In June 2021, the Company used a portion of proceeds received from preferred units purchase agreements to repay the remaining unpaid interest and the principal balance of $27,200 associated with the LOC. The LOC expired at December 31, 2021.
12. Employee Benefits
401(k) Plan
The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) Plan with Company contributions to be made at the sole discretion of the management. Under the provisions of the 401(k) Plan, the Company matches the employees’ contributions for the first 3% of compensation and matches 50% of the employees’ contributions for the next 2% of compensation. The expense for the 401(k) Plan was $2,511, $1,878 and $1,813 for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
13. Equity-Based Compensation
The total compensation expense recognized for common share options, time-based RSU awards and common unit appreciation rights during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $10,821, $6,441 and $3,718, respectively. This includes G&A expenses of $5,197 and other expense of $5,624 in 2022, $3,257 of G&A expenses and $3,184 in other expense in 2021 and $3,718 of G&A expenses in 2020.

Options to purchase common units of NuScale LLC under the Fourth Amended and Restated 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of NuScale LLC (the “Legacy Plan”) were granted, before completion of the Transaction, at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the Public Warrants, subsequentNuScale LLC units at the date of grant. In connection with the Transaction, all outstanding options to purchase NuScale LLC units converted into options to purchase 14,742,933 shares of NuScale Corp Class A common stock with no change to the remaining vesting schedule. Shares underlying those options, and an additional 17,760,961 shares of Class A common stock issuable under the Company’s 2022 long-term incentive plan (“2022 LTIP”), were registered on a registration statement on Form S-8, filed with the SEC on July 5, 2022. Except with respect to equity awards outstanding as of the completion of the Transaction, the Legacy Plan terminated on May 2, 2022, and no further equity awards will be made, or have been made since, under the Legacy Plan.

Unit options granted became exercisable 25% after one year of service and on a monthly basis over three years of service thereafter. In February 2014, the Board of Managers of NuScale LLC approved amendments to NuScale LLC’s “Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan” and unit option agreements. The amendments generally allowed terminated and retiring employees with over five years of service to NuScale LLC an extended period of time, up to the expiration of the option, during which to exercise their fully vested options when employment ceases.

Under the Company’s 2022 LTIP there have been no options granted but there were two director RSU awards and an employee RSU award. The vesting schedule differed for each award and is explained further under Time-based RSUs
F-23


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
below. Further, in February 2023, the Board of Directors approved an additional 1,835,016 employee RSU awards that vest one-third annually starting in February 2024 for a period of three years.

Effective January 1, 2023, the share pool was automatically increased by 8,972,128, which is the number of shares of Class A common stock equal to four percent (4%) of the aggregate number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding on December 31, 2022, excluding any such outstanding shares of Class A common stock that were granted under the 2022 long-term incentive plan and remain unvested and subject to forfeiture as of December 31, 2022.

Stock Options

The following table summarizes the stock options activity relating to the Legacy Plan of NuScale LLC (historical NuScale LLC units and weighted average exercise price were adjusted using the exchange ratio) as of and for the period ended December 31, 2022:

Weighted AverageAggregate
Share OptionsNumber of SharesExercise PriceIntrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 202115,393,670 $3.64 $101,906 
Granted208,013 $9.53 $— 
Exercised(3,197,310)$2.24 $25,642 
Forfeited(63,012)$6.70 $— 
Expired(116,578)$2.40 $— 
Outstanding at December 31, 202212,224,783 $4.09 $75,427 
Exercisable at December 31, 202210,795,243 $3.73 $70,493 
Vested and Expected to Vest at December 31, 202212,224,783 $4.09 $75,427 

The total fair value of options that vested during 2022, 2021 and 2020 was $3,986, $6,291 and $3,673, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual term for all options outstanding at December 31, 2022 was 5.4 years and the remaining weighted average contractual term of options exercisable was 5.0 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted for the year ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $6.29 and $4.16, respectively. These awards were granted under the Legacy Plan and required their fair value be adjusted using the exchange ratio. Prior to the Transaction, the options had no intrinsic value. Cash received for the exercise of stock options for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 totaled $7,224 and $748, respectively. Total unrecognized stock option expense as of December 31, 2022 totaled $5,985 with a weighted-average period over which it is expected to be recognized of 1.8 years.

The following assumptions were used in determining the fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:
202220212020
Risk-free interest rate1.44%0.62%-1.31%0.37%-0.59%
Expected dividend yieldNANANA
Expected option life6.25 years6.25 years6.25 years
Expected price volatility73.98%64.60%-73.98%64.60%-69.21%
Time-based RSUs
In July 2022, under the Company’s 2022 long-term incentive plan, the Board approved 2,091,282 employee time-based RSU awards that vest one-third annually starting in May 2023 for a period of three years. In addition, 39,215 and 53,920 time-based RSU awards were approved for certain members of the Board of Directors that vest quarterly over one and
F-24


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
three years, respectively. The employee and Board time-based RSU awards had an aggregate fair value of $22,373 and $950, respectively. Total unrecognized RSU award expense as of December 31, 2022 totaled $18,656.

The February 2023 RSU award has an aggregate fair value of $18,992.

The following table summarizes the activity of our time-based RSUs as of and for the year ended, December 31, 2022:

Weighted Average
Time-based RSUsNumber of RSUsGrant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2021— $— 
Granted2,184,417 10.71 
Vested(28,595)10.20 
Forfeited/Expired(15,171)11.82 
Outstanding at December 31, 20222,140,651 $10.71 

Common Unit Appreciation Rights
In 2013, NuScale LLC granted its Chief Executive Officer 1,000 common unit appreciation rights (“UARs”). The UARs vested one-third each year on the anniversary of the grant date. Upon exercise of a UAR, the holder would receive common units equal to the excess of the fair value of the common units over the strike price of $0.11 at the grant date multiplied by the number of rights exercised and divided by the fair value of the common unit upon exercise.

In February 2022, the NuScale LLC Board of Managers approved a $1,540 cash payment (paid during the three months ended June 30, 2022) in lieu of equity issuance related to the UARs, which triggered recognition of $1,490 of equity-based compensation expense, included in G&A expenses.

14. Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2022, NuScale Corp holds 30.6% of the economic interest in NuScale Power, LLC, which is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a partnership, NuScale Power, LLC is itself generally not subject to U.S. federal income tax under current U.S. tax laws as its net taxable income (loss) and any related tax credits are passed through to its members and included in their tax returns, even though such net taxable income (loss) or tax credits may not have actually been distributed. NuScale Power Corp is subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to its distributive share of the net taxable income (loss) and any related tax credits of NuScale Power, LLC. For the days and periods prior to the Reverse Recapitalization, NuScale Power, LLC was a partnership. As such, its net taxable loss and any related tax credits were allocated to its members. The period as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 discussed below represents the period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending December 31, 2022.

The Company had no current or deferred income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2022.

A reconciliation of income tax expense with amounts computed at the federal statutory tax rate is as follows:
F-25


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Computed tax (21%)$(29,730)
Income attributable to legacy NuScale LLC holders$6,543 
Income tax benefit attributable to NCI$17,746 
Change in valuation allowance$9,227 
State income tax benefit, net of effect on federal tax$(1,235)
Other, net (none in excess of 5% of computed tax)$(2,551)
Income tax expense$— 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities) were as follows:
Deferred TaxesYear Ended December 31, 2022
Deferred Tax Assets:
 Investment in NuScale Power LLC$122,982 
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards$3,577 
Stock Compensation$95 
Total deferred tax assets$126,654 
Valuation allowance$(126,654)
Total$— 
Deferred Tax Liabilities (none noted)
Net deferred tax asset$— 

The Company has assessed the realizability of the net deferred tax assets, and in that analysis, has considered the relevant positive and negative evidence available to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considered all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies, and recent results of operations. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the cumulative loss incurred by NuScale Power, LLC over the three year period ended December 31, 2022. Such objective evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as projections for future growth. After consideration of all these factors, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets at NuScale Power Corp as of the Closing Date of the Transaction and as of December 31, 2022, which will be maintained until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. The initial measurement,recognition of the Company’s deferred tax assets and valuation allowance in connection with the Transaction was recorded to additional paid-in-capital on the consolidated balance sheet. As noted above, the valuation allowance completely offset the deferred tax assets of NuScale Power Corp, which resulted in a net zero impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of the Closing Date of the Transaction.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company had transfers outU.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) and credit carryforwards totaling $3,099, which do not expire, as well as state NOL carryforwards totaling $478, which have various expiration dates extending through 2041.

The Company recognizes the financial statement effects of Level 3 totaling $6,325,000 duringuncertain income tax positions when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. To the extent the Company’s
F-26


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
assessment of such tax positions changes, the change in estimate will be recorded in the period from November 27, 2020 throughin which the determination is made. As of December 31, 2020.
The non-cash loss on revaluation of2022, the Private Placement Warrants is included in recognized loss on change in fair value of warrant liabilitiesCompany has not recorded any uncertain tax positions, as well as any accrued interest and penalties on the statement of operations.

F-19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTE 10 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluated subsequent events and transactions that occurred afterconsolidated balance sheet. During the balance sheet date up to the date that the financial statements were issued. Except as described in the next paragraph and in these financial statements,year ended December 31, 2022, the Company did not identifyrecord any subsequent events that would have required adjustment or disclosureinterest and penalties in the financial statements.On March 25, 2021consolidated statements of operations.

The Company’s income tax filings will be subject to audit by various taxing jurisdictions. The Company will monitor the status of U.S. federal, state and local income tax returns that may be subject to audit in future periods. No U.S. federal, state, and local income tax returns are currently under examination by the respective taxing authorities.
15. Related Party Transactions
From time to time, the Company enteredenters into anstrategic agreements with Fluor, whereby Fluor or NuScale perform services for one another. For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, NuScale incurred expenses for services by Fluor of $31,289, $18,113 and $4,452, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, NuScale owes Fluor, as accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet, amounts totaling $7,694 and $3,731, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, NuScale earned revenue of $8,550 and $1,553, respectively, with no revenue earned in 2020. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 Fluor owes NuScale $1,508 and $612, respectively, amounts which are included in accounts and other receivables on the consolidated balance sheet.
For 2022, revenue earned from Fluor accounted for 72.4% of total revenue.

16. Commitments and Contingencies

In the regular course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings and claims incidental to the normal course of business. Additionally, we are involved in various legal proceedings and claims relating to the Transaction with Spring Valley. These legal proceedings relate to the level of disclosure of matters prior to the Transaction, which the Company believes were timely addressed well before the Transaction. We do not believe that any of the claims are material to the Company.Management does not believe that resolution of any of these matters will materially affect the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On September 19, 2022, thirteen purported members of NuScale LLC filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon against NuScale LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Japan NuScale Innovation, Inc., and Sargent & Lundy Holdings, LLC. The plaintiffs purport to represent a class of individuals who held common units or options to purchase common units in NuScale LLC and seek declaratory relief and damages based on breach of contract and other common law claims. The claims are based on amendments to the operating agreement and plan of merger (the “Merger Agreement”), byNuScale LLC in connection with the Merger between NuScale LLC and among the company, Spring Valley Merger Sub, Inc.,Acquisition Corp. Plaintiffs claim that such amendments required the consent of holders of common units in NuScale LLC voting as a Delaware corporationseparate class. NuScale LLC’s response to the complaint was filed on November 21, 2022. Plaintiffs’ reply was filed on January 17, 2023. While no assurance can be given as to the ultimate outcome of this matter, we do not believe it is probable that a loss will be incurred and we have not recorded any liability as a result of these actions.

In conjunction with DOE Office of Nuclear Energy Award DE-NE0008935 with Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems’ (“UAMPS”) wholly owned subsidiary, Carbon Free Power Project, LLC (“CFPP LLC”), we entered into a DCRA, pursuant to which we are developing the NRC license application and performing other site licensing and development activities. Under the DCRA, we may be obligated to refund to UAMPS a percentage of its net development costs up to a specified cap, which varies based on the stage of project development, if certain performance criteria are not met. As of March 7, 2023, when we entered into Amendment 3 of the company (“Merger Sub”),DCRA and Dream Holdings, Inc., a Delaware public benefit corporation (“Dream Holdings”), relatingthe Long Lead Material Reimbursement Agreement with CFPP LLC, the maximum reimbursement based on the current stage of project development is $81,000. As of December 31, 2022 the net development costs incurred by UAMPS totaled $17,834.

Under this agreement, the Company is required to a proposed business combination with AeroFarms. Pursuanthave credit support to fund the amount of its potential reimbursement of these net development costs. This letter of credit is updated quarterly based on an agreed upon forecasted estimate of net development costs. A stipulation of attaining the letter of credit is for the Company to segregate funds from the operating
F-27


NuScale Power Corporation
Notes to the Merger Agreement, among other things, Dream Holdings will merge withConsolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except shares and into Merger Sub (the “Merger,” togetherper share amounts)
bank accounts as collateral for the letter of credit. This account is identified as restricted cash in the amount of $26,532, on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and acts as collateral for the $26,000 letter of credit outstanding at December 31, 2022.

In December 2022, NuScale and Fluor provided CFPP LLC with the other transactions related thereto,results of an economic competitiveness test (“ECT”) comparing the “Proposed Transactions”),calculated LCOE for CFPP with Dream Holdings survivingtheprice target of $58.00/MWh as provided for under the Merger asamended DCRA. The LCOE exceeded the price target, meaning there was an ECT Failure. As a wholly owned subsidiaryresult of the company. For additional information regardingECT Failure UAMPS Members participating in the Proposed TransactionsCFPP were given the opportunity to exit the Project. CFPP LLC had until March 1, 2023 to deliver notice that it intended to terminate its participation in the Project. If CFPP LLC had issued notice that it intended to terminate its participation in the Project by March 1, 2023, the Company could have been liable to pay CFPP LLC approximately $17.8 million and the Merger AgreementCompany would then have had the option to take over the Project assets and related agreements, seecontinue to develop CFPP. However, on March 1, 2023, UAMPS notified NuScale confirming that sufficient Project Participants have opted to continue with CFPP development notwithstanding the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the CompanyECT failure. The next ECT is scheduled to be run in conjunction with the SEC on March 26, 2021.
submission of the Class 2 PCE.

F-28
F-20