UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K /A


10-K/A

(Mark One)


xAnnual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021

oTransition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Transition Period from __________ to _______

Commission File Number: 000-52942

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada20-5543728
For the Transition Period from _______________ to _______________
Commission File Number: 000-52942
BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Nevada20-5543728

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. employer

identification number)

1350 Independence St.
Lakewood,

5765 Logan Street

Denver, CO

80215

80216

(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number: (800) 844-5576

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Issuer’s telephone number: (800) 844-5576
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
None
NoneNone
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of class)
(Title of class)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes oNox


��
1

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes oNox


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesx No o


Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yesx No o


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:


Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
xEmerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by checkmark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)Yes oNox


The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 20152021 was approximately $5,000,000.


$11,001,000.

As of April 30, 20161, 2022 the registrant had 125,348,026 8,485,144 outstanding shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

 

2

Explanatory Note
The amended 10-K is being filed:

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The purpose of this amendment is to amend Item 12 in the 10-K report originally filed by the Company.

since the Company’s auditors, Malone Bailey, LLP, had not consented to the release of their audit opinion as of May 4, 2016; and

to revise Note 13 to the financial statements included as part of the 10-K report.


3

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the year ended December 31, 2015


2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS

Page
PART I
4
8
9
9
9
Item 4Mine Safety Disclosures10
PART II
10
10
10
12
12
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
19
19

22
2


4


FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements about our business, financial condition and prospects that reflect our management’s assumptions and beliefs based on information currently available. We can give no assurance that the expectations indicated by such forward-looking statements will be realized. If any of our assumptions should prove incorrect, or if any of the risks and uncertainties underlying such expectations should materialize, our actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements.


The key factors that are not within our control and that may have a direct bearing on operating results include, but are not limited to, acceptance of our services, our ability to expand our customer base, managements’ ability to raise capital in the future, the retention of key employees and changes in the regulation of our industry.


There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict. When used in this report, words such as, "believes,"  "expects," "intends,"  "plans,"  "anticipates,"  "estimates" ” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify and qualify forward-looking statements, although there may be certain forward-looking statements not accompanied by such expressions.

3

PART

PART I


ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

ITEM 1.DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We were originally incorporated in Nevada on September 11, 2006, under the name The Engraving Masters, Inc. (the “Company”).

On May 2, 2014, we changed our name to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

On May 6, 2014,February 8, 2021, our directors approved a 14-for-1 forward stock split.  In connection with the100-for-1 reverse split of our common stock. The reverse stock split our authorized capital increased to 1,400,000,000 shares of common stock.  All references to share and per share amountsbecame effective in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

public market in July 2021.

We provide armed protection and transportation, banking, compliance and training services for businesses engaged in the legal cannabis industry. During the year ended December 31, 20152021 approximately 88%38% of our revenue was derived from armed protection and transportation services. The remaining 12%62% of our revenue was derived from currency processing services (60%) and compliance (9%), and other services (3%(2%).


In March 2015, our wholly-owned Nevada subsidiary, BLPG, Inc., was granted licenses to provide our services  in Nevada.

Our base of operations isare in the Denver, Colorado and Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area.areas. Our corporate headquarters isare located at 1350 Independence St., Lakewood, CO 80215.  We also own a building at 5765 Logan St.,Street, Denver, Colorado.


CO 80216.

Principal Services


Cultivation facilities are the producers of legal cannabis that eventually make its way to consumers. Growers’ operations typically span a large geographic footprint, making them susceptible to theft, as are shipments from the growers to testing laboratories or to retail dispensaries. Additionally, due to current federal marijuana legislation and banking environment, growers are finding it increasingly difficult to secure their cash, purchase equipment and obtain financing for expansion.


Dispensaries are the retail face of the legal cannabis industry. All legal sales of cannabis products are transacted through dispensaries that are state-licensed. To maintain their licenses, dispensaries must comply with a variety of state-mandated reporting requirements, including reporting every gram of cannabis passing in and out of the store. Dispensaries also face financing and banking challenges similar to those that growers encounter.

5



We do not grow, test or sell cannabis.


Our services cover the following:


Protection and Transportation


Fundamental to the legal cannabis industry is the protection of product and cash throughout the distribution channel. Growers ship product from their cultivation facilities to independent laboratories where it is tested for compliance with state-mandated parameters. From the labs, the product is then delivered to the retail dispensaries, where it is sold to the public.


Due to the current banking and regulatory environments, payments between each step in the distribution network are made in cash: from the customer back to the grower. Therefore, these businesses are forced into having to transport bags of money between growers and dispensaries and their own vaults or storage facilities.


The risk of theft of cash and product is present at every stage, even when they are not in transit. Accordingly, all cannabis businesses require security measures to prevent theft, mitigate risk to employees and maintain regulatory compliance.


We began our security and protection operations in the State of Colorado in February 2014. In less than six months,Since that time, we have become the largest legal cannabis protection services company in the state. We offer a fully integrated approach to managing the movement of cannabis and cash from growers through dispensaries via armed and armored transport, money processing, vaulting and related credit. Money processing services generally include counting, sorting and wrapping currency.

4

We currently supply guards,asset protection and armed andvia armored transportation to approximately 60% of all the licensees in Colorado. We are focused on encompassing all compliance needs on behalf of our clients, as mandated by the State and Federal authorities for the protection, transport and sale of cannabis.


We also offer security monitoring, asset vaulting, and VIP and dignitary protection.

Banking


The banking system in the U.S. is, in most states, federally regulated. Possession or distribution of marijuana violates federal law, and banks that provide support for those activities face the risk of prosecution and assorted sanctions. Currently, almost all payments for the sales of cannabis are made in cash, due the inability of sellers to obtain merchant processing accounts. As a result, processing money from marijuana sales puts federally insured banks at risk of drug racketeering charges, so they'vethey’ve refused to open accounts for marijuana-related businesses. 



Marijuana businesses that can'tcan’t use banks may have too much cash they can'tcan’t safely put away, leaving them vulnerable to criminals. Jurisdictions that allow cannabis sales want a channel to receive taxes.


In February 2014, Thethe Obama administration gave banks a road map for conducting transactions with cannabis sellers operating within state regulations so these companies can stash away savings,deposit cash, make payroll and pay taxes like a traditional place of business. The move was designed to let financial institutions serve such businesses while ensuring that they know their customers'customers’ legitimacy and remain obligated to report possible criminal activity.  However, there remains nothing expressly protecting banks that work with state-legal, state-licensed marijuana businesses from prosecution.  We are unaware of any bank, in any state, allowing bank accounts for cannabis-related businesses for fear of prosecution and losing their FDIC status and insurance.


We have created a means for the banks to validate compliance with the Federal Mandate.federal mandate mentioned above. Currently only a security company could match the compliance requirements as only we can vertically integrate the source of funds through the Federally required 12 steps, summarized as from grow, to sale, (to those of approved age or license), to purchaser, to funds received, to where the funds were held, to vault, to third party validation, to tax, to profits, to access to the banking system etc. We are uniquely positioned, through a number of partnership and cooperation agreements, to provide banking solutions to our clients.


Compliance


Laws concerning business procedures and practices are changing across the nation. It’s hard to keep up with all the changes, and business owners have to balance their day-to-day operations with remaining compliant with and responsive to regulatory agencies. Blue Line Protection Group provides daily on-site compliance verification to ensure that local business owners are operating lawful and inspection-ready establishments. Our security experts, trained in crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) techniques, can provide crucial advice about enhancing the interior and exterior security of your establishment.


We communicate regularly with local and national government representatives to ensure that we remain the top-tier security and protection group in the nation. Retail establishments aren’t the only ones who have to remain compliant with the pertinent laws - we do, as well.


We have agreed a joint venture with one of the largest PEO HR companies in America out of Phoenix Arizona.  They will handle all payments to employees of the companies we serve.  They will also handle background checks on all employees. We will receive a percentage of every contract.

With the addition of our compliance module clients can be confident they will not lose their license for some small or large error by their staff that might put their cannabis license in jeopardy. Their license being, in most instances, their most valuable asset. We are relieving them of several burdens they are ill suited to comply with. (Most licensees were formally acting outside the law prior to the recent legislation and have little to no compliance experience).

5

Training


Over 90%

Many of our security personnel have established military or police background.backgrounds. We ensure our employees are prepared to offer clients, their staff and customers a safe and secure environment. All members of the Company'sour armored transportation team and security operators are required to undertake our mandatory, rigorous 40-hour introductory compliance and training curriculum created and supervised by both:


1.The former Chief of Police for the City of Aurora, the second largest city in Colorado and

2.A 26 years veteran of the Jefferson County, Colorado Sheriff's Office with 17 years on its SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) unit, seven of which were as team leader.

veteran law enforcement officers.

In addition to internal training, we also offer other businesses, houses of worship and the general public a wide variety of safety, security and personal defense courses and firearms training.


Accounting and Bookkeeping

During March 2015 we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Blue Line Advisory Services, Inc., to provide a complete accounting solution for the legal marijuana industry.  In September 2005 we terminated this segment of our business.

Growth Strategy


1.  1.Expand into new markets to establish first-mover advantages.
2.  
2.Market ourselves through strategic alliances and affiliations.
3.  
3.Acquire or joint venture with guard and alarm businesses throughout the USA if they represent good value and a good fit with our expansion plans. Organic growth will not suffice for the rapid growth of this industry and our ability to provide service immediately requires variations of this strategy.
4.  
4.Increase our client base to the various labs in state. Offering our superior chain of control compliance and software.
5.  
5.Develop and offer value-added, complementary or supplementary services.

The development of the legal markets for cannabis is a function of state legislation. As a result, while specific markets may not be currently available, we actively monitor the progress of legislation and know with some degree of certainty when new geographic markets will be coming on line. This allows us to target our limited sales and marketing resources to those new markets. In this way, we believe the current legislative environment works in our favor - if the whole country were currently a potential market our limited resources would result in an inability to effectively cover all potential market territories. With limited markets open we can better cover those available territories.


Marketing


Virtually all of our sales, to date, have been generated without using paid media. Our security personnelarmed operators conduct the majority of our marketing and advertising efforts. Nearly allSeveral of our guardsoperators are former police officers or military personnel and are the face of our company. They interact with business owners, employees, and customers on a daily basis. As such, they generate significant brand awareness and word-of-mouth goodwill. Complementary to this, our sales team and our management actively engagesengage with business owners directly to generate awareness of our company and the services we provide, as well as to identify the potential for sales or referrals.


In addition to a direct sales approach and word-of-mouth advertising, we have been featured in news articles and video documentaries by outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Fortune and CNBC, which have served to increase brand awareness nationwide. We have also attended a variety of industry trade shows and have been granted membership in industry groups.


Industry Background


The total market for marijuana, legal or otherwise, is estimated to exceed the economic value of corn and wheat combined. Marijuana is widely considered the largest cash crop in the United States. Businesses have been positioning themselves for years, each trying to establish a leadership position in the legal marijuanacannabis industry, that management expectsprojected to be worth over $50reach as high as $37 billion in retail sales by the year 2020.  Marijuana sales reportedly averaged about $1,000,000 per day in the first five days of legalization in Colorado, and fiscal-year 2014 sales exceeded $700,000,000.  California and Colorado each expect to collect tax revenue of approximately $100,000,000 during their 2015 fiscal years.  2024.

6

Competition


We believe the primary factors in attracting and retaining customers are expertise, service quality, and price. Our competitive advantages include:


Brand name recognition;

Reputation;

Reputation;
Expertise in regulatory and banking compliance;

Operational excellence;

Cash processing, transportation and storage capabilities;

Security and logistics infrastructure;

Services beyond guardstransportation and transportation,banking services, where we become intimate to the businesses continuance and success through mandatory standards of compliance; and

Economies of scale as we increase the amount and number of items we securely transport.

Our cost structure is generally competitive, although certain competitors may have lower costs due to a variety of factors, including lower wages, lower initial and ongoing training requirements, less costly employee benefits, or less stringent security and service standards. We anticipate facing competitive pricing pressure in many markets; however, we plan to resist competing on price alone. We believe our high levels of service and security, as well as value-added solutions, differentiates us from competitors.


We compete with companies of all sizes in a variety of geographies that offer solutions that compete with single elements of our platform, such as regulatory compliance, armed security, armored transportation services and moneycash processing. The security services industry is a large and competitive market. More specifically, however, the market for security and storage solutions as it pertains to medical marijuana companies is a nascent market, resulting in a highly fragmented and fractured marketplace. Some of the companies we compete with are much larger than us, and such companies have significantly greater resources than us. None of the large security companies, such as Brinks, Argyle, Tyco or Torment, are currently competing in this market segment, although there can be no guarantee this trend will continue.


Significantly all of our current and potential traditional competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer or user bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Our competitors may be able to secure experienced employees, accommodate customers more efficiently and adopt more aggressive pricing policies than we can. Many of these current and potential competitors can devote substantially more resources to advertising, marketing and attracting experienced talent than we can. In addition, larger, more well-established and financed entities may acquire, invest in or form joint ventures with our competitors.


Government Regulation


In most jurisdictions we are required to obtain government approval to provide security and/or investigative services. We expect to make every effort to comply with all existing and pending regulatory conditions and licensing requirements in each state we currently or potentially operate in.


Continued development of the marijuana industry is dependent upon continued legislative authorization of marijuana at the state level. Any number of factors could slow or halt progress in this area. Further, progress, while encouraging, is not assured. While there may be ample public support for legislative action, numerous factors impact the legislative process. Any one of these factors could slow or halt use of marijuana, which would negatively impact our proposed business.

7

Marijuana is a Schedule-I controlled substance and is illegal under federal law. Even in those states in which the use of marijuana has been legalized, its use remains a violation of federal laws. There are currently 2337 states and the District of Columbia allowing its citizens to use Medical Marijuana. Additionally, Alaska, Colorado, Oregon,18 states and Washington State, as well as Washington D.C., have voted to legalizelegalized cannabis for adult recreational use. The state laws are in conflict with the federal Controlled Substances Act, which makes marijuana use and possession illegal on a national level. The former Obama administration has effectively stated that it is not an efficient use of resources to direct law federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those lawfully abiding by state-designated laws allowing the use and distribution of medical marijuana. However, there is no guarantee that the administration will not change its stated policy regarding the low-priority enforcement of federal laws.  Additionally, any new Trump administration that follows could change this policy and decide to enforce the federal laws strongly. Active enforcement of the current federal regulatory position on cannabis may thus indirectly and adversely affect our revenues and profits. Any such change in the federal government’s enforcement of current federal laws could cause significant financial damage to us. While we do not intend to harvest, distribute or sell cannabis, we may be irreparably harmed by a change in enforcement by the Federal or state governments.


Intellectual Property


We are developing a proprietary streamlined government-certified software capable of tracking all movements of cannabis products through to cash to taxes paid to deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. The technology behind our software is being engineered and developed by subcontractors, and we consider it proprietary and confidential, and protected under trade secret laws. We have not sought to patent our aspect of this technology; however, we have not yet determined if we will seek to patent any aspect of the software in the future.


We plan to protect our proprietary and confidential information through a series of non-compete and non-disclosure contracts with our employees, contractors and other interested parties. The law of protection of confidential information effectively allows a perpetual monopoly in secret information, and it does not expire as would a patent. The lack of formal protection, however, means that a third party is not prevented from independently duplicating and using the secret information once it is discovered.


Number of total employees and number of full time employees


As of AprilMarch 31, 2022, we had approximately 30 2016, we have approximately 84 full-full and part-time employees, 95%some of whomwhich are former military or law enforcement professionals.


Properties


We lease office space at 1350 Independence St., Lakewood, CO 80215 atour offices in Denver, Colorado pursuant to a rate of $1,442 per month. There are currently no proposed programs forlease which expires on October 26, 2026. We have the renovation, improvement or developmentoption to extend the term of the facilities we use.


On July 15, 2014, we purchasedlease for two additional five-year periods. The lease requires rental payments of approximately $10,612.00 per month which increases 2% annually.

We lease our offices in Phoenix, Arizona pursuant to a commercial buildinglease which expires on May 31st, 2023. We have the option to extend the term of the lease for a total purchase pricetwo additional five-year periods. The lease requires rental payments of $750,000, forapproximately $4,113.56 per month which we paid a down payment of $75,000 and financed the remaining $675,000 in the form of a promissory note.  The note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum on the unpaid principal balance and is due in full on July 31, 2016.  Interest is paid monthly, in arrears, in the amount of $2,813 beginning August 31, 2014.  We expect to place this property into service in May, 2016


ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

increases approximately 3% annually.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

We have a limited operating history and may not succeed.

We have a limited operating history and may not succeed. We are subject to all risks inherent in a developing business enterprise. Our likelihood of continued success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with manufacturing specialty products and the competitive and regulatory environment in which we operate. You should consider, among other factors, our prospects for success in light of the risks and uncertainties encountered by companies that, like us, are in their early stages. For example, unanticipated expenses, problems, and technical difficulties may occur and they may result in material delays in the operation of our business, in particular with respect to our new products. We may not successfully address these risks and uncertainties or successfully implement our operating strategies. If we fail to do so, it could materially harm our business to the point of having to cease operations and could impair the value of our common stock to the point investors may lose their entire investment.

8

We may not be able to attain profitability without additional funding, which may be unavailable.


We have limited capital resources. To date, we have not earned a profit or generated cash from our operations. Unless we begin to generate sufficient revenues from our proposed business to finance operations as a going concern, we may experience liquidity and solvency problems. Such liquidity and solvency problems may force us to go out of business if additional financing is not available. We have no intention of liquidating. In the event our cash resources are insufficient to continue operations, we intend to raise additional capital through offerings and sales of equity or debt securities. In the event we are unable to raise sufficient funds, we will be forced to go out of business and will be forced to liquidate. A possibility of such outcome presents a risk of complete loss of investment in our common stock.


ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

The occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations depending on the severity and longevity of the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is currently impacting countries, communities, supply chains and markets as well as the global financial markets. A pandemic typically results in social distancing, travel bans and quarantine, and this may limit access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors. These factors, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for services but our overall ability to react timely to mitigate the impact of this event. Also, it may hamper our efforts to comply with our filing obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, our business, customers, and shareholders may experience a significant negative impact.

ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

See Item 1. Business.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

9

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.
PART

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND MARKET INFORMATION FOR COMMON STOCK

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND MARKET INFORMATION FOR COMMON STOCK

The high and low closing prices of our common stock for the periods indicated are set forth below. These closing prices do not reflect retail mark-up, markdown or commissions.


Year ended December 31, 2014 High  Low 
       
First Quarter  N/A   N/A 
Second Quarter $0.80  $0.70 
Third Quarter $0.81  $0.31 
Fourth Quarter $0.50  $0.19 

Year ended December 31, 2015 High  Low 
       
First Quarter $0.24  $0.21 
Second Quarter $0.05  $0.05 
Third Quarter $0.04  $0.04 
Fourth Quarter $0.03  $0.03 

Prices for 2021 reflect a 100-for-1 reverse stock split which became effective in the public market in July 2021.

Year ended December 31, 2021 High  Low 
       
First Quarter $2.30  $0.13 
Second Quarter $2.15  $0.76 
Third Quarter $1.98  $0.54 
Fourth Quarter $2.95  $0.78 

Year ended December 31, 2020 High  Low 
       
First Quarter $0.0012  $0.0002 
Second Quarter $0.0005  $0.0002 
Third Quarter $0.0013  $0.0003 
Fourth Quarter $0.0010  $0.0009 

As of April 30, 2016,March 31, 2022 we had 8,485,144 outstanding shares of common stock held by approximately 280215 shareholders of record. Our transfer agent is:is Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 4045 South Spencer Street, Suite 403, Las Vegas, NV 89119, phone (702) 361-3033.


ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.


ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” preceding Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional factors relating to such statements.


You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Report.


Results of Operations

Material changes in line items in our Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 20152021 as compared to the same period last year, are discussed below:

Increase (I) or
ItemDecrease (D)Reason
RevenueIMore security for special events, private partiesIncreased revenues from processing and transport of cashtransportation.
Gross profit, as a % of revenueDIncrease in personnel and salaries
Advertising expensesInterest expenseDCost reduction measuresDecrease in borrowings.
General and Administrative expensesDDecrease
Gain on derivate securitiesIChange in stock based compensation and cost reduction measuresderivative value

10

Capital Resources and Liquidity


Our material sources and <uses> of cash during the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 were:

  2015  2014 
       
Cash used by operations $(682,630) $(443,425)
Loan payments  (192,117)  (147,333)
Loan proceeds  603,575   560,604 
Sale of investments  --   200,000 
Construction in progress  (14,825)    
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (6,166)  (1,285,163)
Sale of common stock  50,000   1,362,992 
Other  --   7,854 

General

Our material capital commitments over

  2021  2020 
  $  $ 
Cash provided by <used in> operations ��903,374   462,254 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  <66,002>   (39,470)
Loan payments  <419,954>   (248,147)
Loan proceeds  -   24,000 

As of December 31, 2019 the next five year areCompany had closed its Service-Guards segment.

General

See Notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements included as follows:

Description 2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  Total 
                   
Remodeling building we purchased in 2014 $400,000   -   -   -   -  $400,000 
part of this report for information concerning our notes payable.

Other than as disclosed above, we do not anticipate any material capital requirements for the twelve months ending DecemberMarch 31, 2016.


2023.

Other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Item 7,report, we do not know of any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in, or that are reasonable likely to result in, our liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

Other than as disclosed in this Item 7, we do not know of any significant changes in our expected sources and uses of cash.


We do not have any commitments or arrangements from any person to provide us with any equity capital.


During the next 12 months, we anticipate that we will incur approximately $1,600,000$2,000,000 of general and administrative expenses in order to execute our current business plan. We also plan to incur significant sales, marketing, research and development expenses during the next 12 months. We must obtain additional financing to continue our operations. We may not be able to obtain additional funding on terms that are favorable to us or at all. We may not be able to obtain sufficient funding to continue our operations, or if we do receive funding, to generate adequate revenues in the future or to operate profitably in the future. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.


Critical Accounting Policies


Management considers the following policies critical because they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating results, and they require management to make judgments and estimates about inherently uncertain matters.

Accounts receivable. Accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect from outstanding balances and do not bear interest. We provide for probable uncollectible amounts through an allowance for doubtful accounts, if an allowance is deemed necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable; however, changes in circumstances relating to accounts receivable may result in a requirement for additional allowances in the future. On a periodic basis, management evaluates its accounts receivable and determines the requirement for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current and collectible status of individual accounts with past due balances over 90 days. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

11

Revenue recognition. As all of our Revenue is generated from services offerings, Revenue recognition is the same for each of our revenue streams. We recognize revenue when all of the following conditions are satisfied: (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been provided to the customer; (3) the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) the collection of its fees is reasonably assured.


Stock-based compensation. The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 505 and 718, which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of our employee stock option awards. This eliminates accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value and requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. We recognize the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718-10 and the conclusions reached by the FASB ASC 505-50. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measureable.measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services as defined by FASB ASC 505-50.


Significant Accounting Policies


See Note 2 to the financial statements included as part of this report for a description of our significant accounting policies.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


From time to time, the FASB or other standards setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB ASCs are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”). Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.


To understand the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted, please review the information provided in Note 2 -Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8as part of this Report.


ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.


ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

See the Financial Statements attached to

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements are contained later in this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS

None

12

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS

On July 17, 2015 Seale & Beers, CPAs resigned as our independent registered accounting firm.

On July 29, 2015 we engaged Malone Bailey, LLP as our independent  registered public accounting  firm.

See our 8-K reports dated July 17, 2015 and July 29, 2015 for further information.
ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 9ACONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. As a result of this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2021 for the same reasons that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.


effective:

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:


1.Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

2.  
2.Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

3.  
3.Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of December 31, 2015,2021, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control--IntegratedControl-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO")(2013) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective due to the following material weakness identified:

Lack of controls over related party transactions. The Company did not establish a formal written policy for the approval, identification, and authorization of related party transactions.
Lack of appropriate segregation of duties,

13

Lack of control procedures that include multiple levels of supervision and review, and
There is an overreliance upon independent financial reporting consultants for review of critical accounting areas and disclosures and material, nonstandard transactions.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only the management'smanagement’s report in this annual report.

Implemented or Planned Remedial Actions in response to the Material Weaknesses


We will continue to strive to correct the above noted weakness in internal control once we have adequate funds to do so. We believe appointing a director who qualifies as a financial expert will improve the overall performance of our control over our financial reporting.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 20152021 that materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that its disclosure controls or internal controls will prevent all errors or all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.

14

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

None.


PART

PART III


ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our directors are elected by the stockholders to a term of one year and serve until their successors are elected and qualified. The officers are appointed by our Board of Directors to a term of one year and serve until his/her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he/she is removed from office.


The names and ages of our directors and executive officers and their positions are as follows:


NameAgePosition
Daniel AllenEvan DeVoe6434Chief Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer and a Director
Ricky G. BennettChristopher Galvin5852Vice President of Operations and ComplianceDirector
Michael JeromeDaniel Allen4567Vice President of Media and Public RelationsDirector
Scott Jackson59Director
Doyle Knudson6466Director

Evan DeVoe was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer and a Director on March 13, 2020. Mr. DeVoe, prior to March 13, 2020, was the Company’s Chief Operating Officer (August 2019 – March 2020) and the Company’s Vice President of Systems Development (January 2018 to August 2019). Prior to that time Mr. DeVoe was the controller (May 2016 - June 2017) and an accounting associate (October 2015 - May 2016) for the Weisser Companies, a firm engaged in commercial real estate and retail operations. Between March 2014 and October 2015 Mr. DeVoe was a client service associate for Millennium Portfolio Advisors.

Christopher Galvin has been a director since January 30, 2018. Mr. Galvin founded and served as Chief Executive Officer and chairman of several public and private companies. He began his career in investment banking – focusing on mergers and acquisitions and structured finance – and has deep experience in corporate finance, hedge fund and private equity strategies. Mr. Galvin is the founder and chief executive officer of Hypur Inc., an Arizona-based company providing banking and payment technology designed specifically to enable financial institutions to safely and profitably serve cash-intensive and high-risk businesses. Mr. Galvin is also co-founder and president of Hypur Ventures, a venture capital fund dedicated to investing in businesses that operate in the cannabis industry.

Daniel Allen was elected an officer and director July 28, 2015. Mr. Allen has been President, CEO and a Director of Sibannac, Inc. since August 25, 2014.resigned as an Officer on March 13, 2020. Mr. Allen provided us with a consultantingconsulting services in the areas of banking and financing for four months in 2014. Between April 2013 and March 2014 Mr. Allen served as the Regional Vice President of Sunflower Bank in Longmont, Colorado. Between June 2001 and April 2013, Mr. Allen was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mile High Banks in Longmont, Colorado. Mr. Allen holds a Bachelor of Science in Management and Finance from the University of Utah.


Ricky G. Bennett was appointed On March 13th, 2020, Daniel Allen resigned from his position as CEO. Dan remains an officer on March 24, 2014.  Mr. Bennett was, between October 2013 and March 2014, an independent consultant to Convercent, Inc., a Denver, Colorado-based corporation which develops and markets computer software which firms use to comply with human resource regulations and conduct employee training.  Between 2011 and October 2013 Mr. Bennett was Vice President of Professional Services and Director of Training for Convercent.  Between 2008 and 2010 Mr. Bennett was an Interstate Compact and Youth Offender Officer for the Colorado Department of Corrections.  In this position, Mr. Bennett used a variety of strategies and services to instill pro-social behaviors in offenders transitioning into the community.  Mr. Bennett joined the Aurora, Colorado Police Department in 1980, served as the Aurora Chief of Police between 2002 and 2005, and retired as a commander in 2007.

Michael Jerome has been our Vice President of Media and Public Relations since February 2015.  Between May 2014 and February 2015 Mr. Jerome served as our Director of Media and Public Relations.  Between January 2002 and May 2014 Mr. Jerome was a Deputy Sheriff in Jefferson County Colorado.  Between October 2005 and December 2006 Mr. Jerome was the Public Relations and Communications Manager for the Mizel Museum in Denver, Colorado.  (He held this job when he was also a sheriff?) Between December 1997 and May 2001 Mr. Jerome was a Senior Producer for KHQ-TV in Spokane, Washington.  Mr. Jerome graduated from the University of Colorado and holds a degree in Journalism and Mass Communication.

Scott Jackson was elected as oneactive member of our directors on July 28, 2015.  Mr. Jackson is the founder of Colorado National Bank and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since 2009.  As the Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Jackson is responsible for strategic planning, capital formation development of new market initiatives, loan production and regulatory relationships.  Mr. Jackson has over three decades of experience in finance and banking with expertise in mergers and acquisitions, turnarounds, and start-ups. Mr. Jackson started at Merrill Lynch in 1980, executing financing and M&A transactions for many of the largest national and regional banks west of the Mississippi. From there he joined Republic Bank Texas to develop its Capital Markets Group, before founding and co-managing the Financial Institutions Restructuring Group at Goldman Sachs. At Goldman, he oversaw the restructuring of multiple troubled banks and thrifts and facilitated a number of 1988 Southwest Plan thrift transactions.

Board.

Doyle Knudson was elected as one of our directors on July 28, 2015. Between 1975 and 2002 Mr. Knudson held various positions with C.H. Robinson Company, a large multimodal transportation service provider. In 1975 he started in the corporate marketing center responsible for information services for carrier capacity, carrier insurance verification and research at the ICC in Washington, DC for common carrier authority. In 1976 Mr. Knudson was transferred to Ross Truck, a division of C.H. Robinson – customer support for publication logistics for Target stores and RR Donnelly. In 1978 Mr. Knudson was transferred to Lake Wales, FL as a Transportation Salesman responsible for customer development with agri business customers. In 1982 Mr. Knudson was promoted and transferred as Transportation Manager when he opened a new branch office in Houston, TX. In 1987 Mr. Knudson was promoted to General Manager at a new branch office in El Paso, TX, developing and providing logistics services for Coca Cola; Phelps, Dodge, Dell Computers and Phillips Electronics.


Management Changes
The following shows the changes in our management during the two years ended December 31, 2015:

Elected (E)
Appointed (A)
Resigned (R)
NameTerminated (T)PositionDate
David UddmanRPresident and a Director2-19-14
Jolene UddmanRTreasurer and a Director2-19-14
Ted DanielsADirector2-19-14
Ted DanielsRDirector3-13-14
Dan SullivanADirector2-19-14
Dan SullivanRDirector3-13-14
Sean CampbellADirector3-13-14
Sean CampbellAChief Executive Officer3-14-14
Ted DanielsAVice President of Marketing3-14-14
Dan SullivanAVice President of Sales3-14-14
Ricky BennettAVice President of Operations3-24-14
Patrick DepariniAChief Financial and Accounting Officer8-01-14
Ted DanielsTVice President of Marketing12-12-14
Dan SullivanTVice President of Sales2-14-15
Daniel AllenAExecutive Vice President of Business7-08-15
Development
Sean CampbellRChief Executive Officer and a Director7-28-15
Daniel AllenEDirector7-28-15
Scott JacksonEDirector7-28-15
Doyle KnudsonEDirector7-28-15
Daniel AllenAChief Executive Officer7-28-15
Patrick DepariniRChief Financial and Accounting Officer12-28-1515


Audit Committee, Independent Directors and Financial Expert


We do not have an Audit Committee; our board of directors currently acts as our Audit Committee. Scott Jackson and Doyle Knudson areis an independent directors,director, as that term is defined in the rules of the NYSE MKT.American. None of our directors is considered a “Financial Expert”.


Code of Ethics


We have not adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions since one person, Dan Allen,Evan DeVoe, serves in all the above capacities.


ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview of Compensation Program


Our Board of Directors acts as our Compensation Committee and has responsibility for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence to our compensation philosophy. The Board of Directors ensures that the total compensation paid to our executives is fair, reasonable and competitive.


Compensation Philosophy and Objectives


The Board of Directors believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals by the Company and that aligns executives’ interests with those of the stockholders by rewarding performance above established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. As a result of the size of the Company and only having two executive officers, the Board evaluates both performance and compensation on an informal basis. Upon hiring additional executives, the Board intends to evaluate the necessity of establishing a Compensation Committee to evaluate both performance and compensation to ensure that the Company maintains its ability to attract and retain superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly-situated executives of peer companies. To that end, the Board believes executive compensation packages provided by the Company to its executives, including the named executive officers, should include both cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance as measured against established goals.


Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions


Our Directors make all compensation decisions for, and approvesapprove recommendations regarding, equity awards to the our Directors and employees.

16

Summary Compensation Table


The following table sets forth for the last completed fiscal years ended December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 the cash compensation paid by the Company as well as certain other compensation paid with respect to those years to ourits officers:


Summary Compensation Table (in $) 
Name and
Principal Position
 Year 
Salary
(1)
  
Stock Awards
(2)
  
Option Awards
(3)
  
All Other
Compensation
(4)
  Total 
Daniel Allen 2015 $69,785   --   214,555   --  $284,340 
CEO 2014  --   --   --   --   -- 
                       
Ricky G. Bennett 2015  88,500  $320,000  $87,747   --  $496,247 
VP of Operations 2014 $59,469   --  $203,941   --  $263,410 
Michael Jerome 2015 $73,538   --  $25,416   --  $100,954 
VP of Media and Public Relations                      
                       
Patrick Deparini 2015 $77,000   --   --   --  $77,000 
CFO 2014  --   --  $466,564   --  $466,564 
                       
Sean Campbell 2015  --   --  $178,459   --  $178,459 
Former CEO 2014 $46,154   --  $423,090   --  $469,244 
                       
Dan Sullivan 2015 $13,462   --   --   --  $13,462 
VP of Marketing 2014 $45,231   --  $1,749,620  $37,194  $1,821,485 
                       
Ted Daniels 2015                    
VP of Sales 2014 $23,077   --   --  $12,520  $35,597 
                       
David Uddman                      
Former President 2014  --   --   --   --   -- 
                       
Jolene Uddman                      
Former Treasurer 2014  --   --   --   --   -- 

Summary Compensation Table (in $)
Name and
Principal Position
 Year  Salary (1)  Stock
Awards (2)
  Option
Awards (3)
  All Other
Compensation (4)
  Total 
Evan DeVoe,  2021  $

188,462

  $            -  $            -                          -  $

188,462

 
Chief Executive Officer(5)  2020  $134,000   -   -   -  $134,000 
                         
Daniel Allen,  2020  $-  $-  $-   -  $- 
Chief Executive Officer (5)                        

(1)The dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned during the year.
(2)
(2)The fair value of the shares of common stock issued during the periods covered by the table calculated on the grant date in accordance with ASC 718-10-30-3.
(3)
(3)The fair value of all stock options granted during the periods covered by the table calculated on the grant date in accordance with ACS 718-10-30-3.
(4)
(4)All other compensation received that we could not properly report in any other column of the table including the dollar value of any insurance premiums we paid for life insurance for the benefit of the named executive officer.
(5)Mr. Allen resigned as our Chief Financial and Accounting Officer on March 13, 2020. On March 13, 2020 Evan DeVoe became our new Chief Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer.
See Item 10 of this report for information  concerning the changes in our management during the two years ended December 31, 2015.

Equity Compensation Plan


Up to 15,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under our 2014-2015 Stock Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) that was adopted on November 12, 2014.  


.

The purposes of the Plan are to enhance our ability to attract and retain the services of qualified employees, officers and directors, contractors and other service providers upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the successful conduct and development of our business largely depends, and to provide additional incentives to such persons or entities to devote their utmost effort and skill to our advancement and betterment by providing them an opportunity to participate in the ownership of our common stock and thereby have an interest in our success.


Shares that are eligible for grant under the Plan include Incentive Stock Options, Non-Qualified Stock Options and Restricted Stock. “Incentive Options” are any options designated and qualified as an “incentive stock option” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. “Non-Qualified Options” are any options that are not an Incentive Option. To the extent that any option designated as an Incentive Option fails in whole or in part to qualify as an Incentive Option, it will constitute a Non-Qualified Option. “Restricted Stock” are shares of common stock issued pursuant to any restrictions and conditions as established by the Plan.


Only our employees (including our officers and Directors if they are employees) are eligible to receive Incentive Options under the Plan.

Our employees, officers and Directors (whether or not employed by us), and service providers are eligible to receive Non-Qualified Options or acquire Restricted Stock under the Plan.

17

The following tables list the options granted, cancelled and exercised during the fiscal yearyears ended December 31, 20152021 and 2020 to our current and former officers and directors pursuant to the Plan:

Options Granted
          
    Options  Exercise Expiration
Name Grant Date Granted  Price Date
          
Dan Allen 7/28/2015  6,328,764  $0.034 7/28/21
Michael Jerome 2/15/2015  150,000  $0.170 2/14/20
Options Cancelled 
          
     Weighted  Weighted Average 
     Average  Remaining Contractual 
Employee Total Options  Exercise Price  Term (Years) 
          
Sean Campbell  4,001,402  $0.23   4.25 
Patrick Deparini  1,200,000  $0.23   4.25 
Dan Sullivan  3,000,000  $0.39   3.58 

Options Granted

NameGrant DateOptions ExercisedGrantedExercise PriceExpiration Date
None----

Options Cancelled

EmployeeTotal OptionsWeighted Average
Exercise Price
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Term
(Years)
None---

Options Exercised

NameDate of ExerciseShares Acquired on ExerciseValue Realized
NameNoneExercise-On Exercise-Realized
-
None
The following lists the options held by our current and former officers and directors:
    Shares underlying unexercised Options which are:     
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable  Exercise Price Expiration Date
              
Dan Allen  3,639,279   2,599,485  $0.03 7/28/2021
Ricky Bennett  2,750,000   1,750,000  $0.04 10/31/2020
Ricky Bennett  200,000   100,000  $1.00 3/31/2019
Michael Jerome  100,000   50,000  $0.17 2/14/2020
Sean Campbell  805,498   --  $0.23 2/28/2019
Dan Sullivan  1,500,000   --  $0.39 7/31/2019

The following shows certain information as of December 31, 20152021 concerning the stock options and stock bonuses granted pursuant to the Plan. Each option represents the right to purchase one share of common stock.

Name of Plan 
Total Shares Reserved Under Plan
  
Shares Reserved for Outstanding Options
  Shares Issued  
Remaining Options/Shares Under Plan
 
             
2014-2015 Stock Incentive Plan  15,000,000   900,000   --   14,100,000 
The following table shows the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options granted pursuant to the Plan as of December 31, 2015. The Plan has not been approved by our shareholders.

Plan Name Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options (a)  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options  Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans, Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a) 
          
2014-2015 Stock Incentive Plan  900,000  $0.25   14,100,000 
Directors'

Plan Name Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options (a)
  Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available For
Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans, Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a)
 
          
2014-2015 Stock Incentive Plan  7,700,000  $0.05   7,300,000 

Directors’ Compensation


Our directors are not entitled to receive compensation for services rendered to us, or for each meeting attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. We have no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate our director for services she provides as a director of our company.


ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 20152021 by (i) each person whom the Company knows beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock; (ii) each of the Company’s officers and directors; and (iii) all the officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each owner has sole voting and investment powers over his shares of common stock.

18
Title Of
Class
Name, Title and Address of
Beneficial Owner of Shares
 Amount of Beneficial Ownership  Percent of Class 
        
CommonDaniel Allen, Chief Executive Officer  668,000   0.5%
CommonRicky G. Bennett, VP of Operations and Compliance  42,000   0.0%
CommonMichael Jerome, VP of Media and Public Relations        
CommonScott Jackson, Director        
CommonDoyle Knudson, Director        
 All Directors and Officers as a group (5 persons)  15,482,688   12.5%
CommonNSG Group, Inc.  6,280,390   5.1%
Common
Dan Sullivan, Former VP of Marketing (1)
  26,754,755   21.7%


Name and Address of OwnerShares OwnedPercent of Class
Evan DeVoe-                     *
Christopher Galvin38,246(1)*
Daniel Allen8,366*
Doyle Knudson35,586(2)*
All Directors and Officers as a group (4 persons)82,198*

(1)Includes 50% of the shares owned by CGDK, LLC, a company in which Mr. Galvin owns a 50% interest, and 2,660 shares owned directly by Mr. Galvin.
(2)Represents 50% of the shares owned by CGDK, LLC a company in which Mr. Knudson owns a 50% interest.
*less than 1%.

Note: As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or share investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of a security).


(1)ITEM 13.Includes 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock held by Arapahoe Foundation, 10,904,455 shares held by Emerald Enterprises and 11,850,300 held in the name of Daniel Sullivan.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

On July 31, 2014, we borrowed $98,150 from an entity controlled by one of our officers and

See Note 7 to the Financial Statements included as a shareholder.  The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest.  As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the principal balance owed on this loan was $98,150.

As of December 31, 2014, a related party had loaned us $10,000, in the form of cash and expenses paid on our behalf.  The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest.  During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company borrowed an additional $20,000 from this person and the principal balancepart of this loan was $30,000 as of December 31, 2015.

As of December 31, 2014, areport for information regarding notes payable to related party had loaned us $180,122, in the form of cash and expenses paid on our behalf.  The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest.  The Company repaid $125,500 towards this loan during 2015 and as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $180,122 and $54,622, respectively.

During 2015, the Company borrowed $20,000 from an entity controlled by one of our shareholders.  The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest.  During 2015, we repaid this loan.

During 2015, we borrowed $43,575 from our former Chief Financial Officer. As of December 31, 2015 $43,000 of the loan had been repaid and the principal amount owed was $575. The loan is non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

During October 2015, we borrowed $30,000 from an entity controlled by one of our officers. The loan is due and payable on demand and is non-interest bearing. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $30,000.

In July 2015, we entered into an arrangement with a related party whereby we could borrow up to $500,000 in Convertible Notes. Through December 31, 2015, we borrowed a total of $415,000 which is evidenced by one Convertible Note.  The Convertible Note bears interest at 5% per year, payable quarterly in arrears, matures twelve months from the date of issuance and is convertible into shares of our common stock at a per share conversion price of $0.025. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance owed on this Convertible Note was $415,000.
ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
parties.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth fees billed to us by our independent auditors for the years ended 20152021 and 20142020 for (i) services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, (ii) services rendered that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported as Audit Fees, and (iii) services rendered in connection with tax preparation, compliance, advice and assistance.


SERVICES 2015  2014 
       
Audit fees $40,000  $20,814 
Audit-related fees      - 
Tax fees      - 
All other fees      - 
         
Total fees $40,000  $20,814 

SERVICES 2021  2020 
       
Audit- M&K CPA $53,450  $43,500 
Tax fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 

Audit fees and audit related fees represent amounts billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our interim financial statements. Before our independent accountants were engaged by to render these services, their engagement was approved by our Directors.

PART IV
ITEM 15.  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit
Number
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Exhibit NumberName and/or Identification of Exhibit
3Articles of Incorporation & By-Laws
(b) By-Laws (1)
(b) By-Laws (1)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
101
Interactive Data Files (2)
(INS) Inline XBRL Instance Document
(SCH) Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
(CAL) Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
(DEF) Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
(LAB) Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
(PRE) Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB, previously filed with the SEC on November 28, 2007.

(2)XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

19

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID : 2738)F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Fiscal Years Ended December  31, 2021 and 2020F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Fiscal Years Ended December  31, 2021 and 2020F-5
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit, Fiscal Years Ended December  31, 2021 and 2020F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7

F-1




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders

of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.
Lakewood, Colorado

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”)(the Company) as of December 31, 2015,2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit),deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibilityeach of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility isyears in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whetheras the financial statements are free of material misstatements.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

statements). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. and its subsidiariesthe Company as of December 31, 2015,2021 and 2020, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the year thenyears in the two-year period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficit and recurring net losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty


/s/ MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
Houston, Texas
May 4, 2016
PCAOB Registered Auditors – www.sealebeers.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014. Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2014.

As discussed in Note 2 of the accompanying financial statements, the 2014 consolidated financial statements have been restated to correct an error.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurringsuffered net losses and recurring negative cash flow from operating activities, andoperations, has an accumulated deficit and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning theseregarding those matters are also describeddiscussed in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



/s/ Seale

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and Beers, CPAs


Sealeare required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and Beers, CPAs
Las Vegas, Nevada
April 10, 2015, exceptthe applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for Note 2,the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Derivative Liabilities

As discussed in Note 8, the dateCompany borrows funds through the use of convertible notes payable that contain a conversion price that may be fixed or fluctuates with the stock price.

Auditing management’s estimates of the fair value of the derivative liability involves significant judgements and estimates given the embedded conversion features of the notes.

To evaluate the appropriateness of the fluctuation of the conversion price, the embedded conversion feature requires bifurcation from the host contract and is recorded as a liability subject to market adjustments as of each reporting period. Significant judgment is exercised by the Company in determining derivative liability values for these convertible note agreements, including the use of a specialist engaged by management.

We evaluated management’s conclusions regarding their derivative liability and reviewed support for the significant inputs used in the valuation model, as well as assessing the model for reasonableness.

M&K CPAS, PLLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.

Houston, TX

April 15, 2016.1, 2022

F-2

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS 
       
  December 31,  December 31, 
  2015  2014 
     (Restated) 
       
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and equivalents $16,211  $211,922 
Accounts receivable, net  51,251   62,101 
Accrued receivables  73,995   54,790 
Notes receivable  -   46,451 
Prepaid expenses and deposits  20,669   2,500 
Total current assets  162,126   377,764 
Fixed assets:        
Machinery and equipment, net  150,910   189,438 
Construction in progress  1,147,139   1,098,553 
Net assets from discontinued operations  2,782   - 
Total fixed assets  1,300,831   1,287,991 
         
Total assets  1,462,957  $1,665,755 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $332,169  $295,863 
Notes payable  75,000   2,000 
Notes payable - related parties  213,347   288,271 
Convertible notes payable - related parties, net of unamortized discounts  283,385   - 
Current portion of long-term debt  679,062   3,735 
Net liabilities from discontinued operations  1,335   - 
Total current liabilities  1,584,298   589,869 
         
Long-term liabilities:        
Long-term debt  12,836   691,780 
Total Long-term liabilities  12,836   691,780 
         
Total liabilities  1,597,134   1,281,649 
         
Stockholders' equity (deficit):        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,        
no shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and        
December 31, 2014, respectively  -   - 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 1,400,000,000 shares authorized,        
125,348,026 and 122,845,282 issued and outstanding as of        
December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively  125,348   122,845 
Common Stock, owed but not issued, 12,923 shares and 749,000 shares        
as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively  13   749 
Additional paid-in capital  4,276,291   3,480,934 
Accumulated (deficit)  (4,535,829)  (3,220,422)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)  (134,177)  384,106 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) $1,462,957  $1,665,755 

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
Assets        
Current assets:        
Cash and equivalents $662,177  $244,750 
Accounts receivable  328,042   322,598 
Prepaid expenses and deposits  34,378   32,216 
Total current assets  1,024,597   599,564 
         
Fixed assets:        
Right to use assets  529,711   636,968 
Machinery and equipment net of accumulated depreciation of $586,130 and $451,759, respectively  284,776   296,410 
Security Deposit  28,958   32,158 
Fixed assets of discontinued operations  2,782   2,782 
Total fixed assets  846,227   968,318 
         
Total assets  1,870,824   1,567,882 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $738,221  $1,160,962 
Financed lease liabilities  29,301   65,985 
Notes payable  -   85,000 
Notes payable - related parties  541,272   696,272 
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized discount  -   169,218 
Convertible notes payable - related parties, net of unamortized discount  575,000   1,830,217 
Current portion of operating lease obligation  125,266   107,242 
Derivative liabilities  712,784   2,247,645 
Total current liabilities  2,721,844   6,362,541 
         
Long-term liabilities:        
Financed lease liabilities - long term  16,402   1,820 
Notes payable - related parties  1,313,817   - 
Operating lease liability-long term  440,366   565,632 
Total long-term liabilities  1,770,585   567,452 
         
Total liabilities  4,492,429   6,929,993 
         
Stockholders’ deficit:        
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively  20,000   20,000 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 14,000,000 shares authorized, 8,485,144 and 8,223,574 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively  8,486   8,224 
Common Stock, owed but not issued, 129 shares and 129 shares as of December 31,  2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively  13   13 
Additional paid-in capital  9,021,126   8,031,471 
Accumulated deficit  (11,671,230)  (13,421,819)
Total stockholders’ deficit  (2,621,605)  (5,362,111)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit $1,870,824  $1,567,882 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-3

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


  For the years ended December 31, 
  2015  2014 
       (Restated)  
         
Revenue $2,618,849  $1,032,168 
Cost of revenue  (2,227,176)  (778,777)
Gross profit  391,673   253,391 
    ��    
Expenses:        
Advertising  30,502   189,536 
Depreciation  41,912   27,172 
General and administrative expenses  1,500,382   3,353,998 
Total expenses  1,572,796   3,570,706 
         
Operating loss  (1,181,123)  (3,317,315)
         
Other expenses:        
Interest expense  (84,484)  (11,308)
Interest income  3,106   10,682 
Gain on sale of securities  -   200,000 
Gain on forgiveness of debt  2,000   - 
Total other expenses  (79,378)  199,374 
         
Net loss from continuing operations  (1,260,501)  (3,117,941)
Net loss from discontinued operations  (54,906)  - 
Net loss $(1,315,407) $(3,117,941)
         
Net loss per share - basic:        
Continuing operations $(0.01) $(0.03)
Discontinued operations  (0.00)  (0.00)
Net loss per share $(0.01) $(0.03)
         
Net loss per share - diluted:        
Continuing operations $(0.01) $(0.03)
Discontinued operations  (0.00)  (0.00)
Net loss per share $(0.01) $(0.03)
         
Weighted average number of        
common shares outstanding - basic  124,545,378   116,942,037 
Weighted average number of        
common shares outstanding - diluted  124,545,378   122,184,808 


  2021  2020 
  For the years ended 
  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
       
Revenue $4,659,393  $4,131,650 
Cost of revenue  (1,284,876)  (1,202,199)
Gross profit  3,374,517   2,929,451 
         
Operating expenses:        
General and administrative expenses  2,118,601   2,136,056 
Total expenses  2,118,601   2,136,056 
         
Operating Income  1,255,916   793,395 
         
Other income (expenses):        
Gain on lease termination  -   8,800 
Gain on settlement of accounts payable  533   4,500 
Interest expense  (583,149)  (745,360)
Income /  (Loss) on derivative  1,077,289   (995,912)
Total other income / (expenses)  494,673   (1,727,972)
         
Net Income / (loss) $1,750,589  $(934,577)
         
Net Income / (loss) per common share: Basic $0.21  $(0.12)
Net Income / (loss) per common share: Diluted $0.14  $(0.12)
         
Weighted average number of        
common shares outstanding- Basic  8,457,364   8,016,204 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding- Basic  8,457,364   8,016,204 
common shares outstanding- Diluted  12,314,864   8,016,204 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding- Diluted  12,314,864   8,016,204 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-4

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) 
                         
              Additional        Stockholders' 
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Stock  Accumulated  Equity 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Payable  (Deficit)  (Deficit) 
                         
Balance, December 31, 2013  -  $-   106,820,000  $106,820  $(5,795) $-  $(102,481) $(1,456)
                                 
Donated capital  -   -   -   -   127,106   -   -   127,106 
                                 
Issued for cash  $0.09 per share  -   -   13,068,050   13,068   1,200,393   -   -   1,213,461 
                               - 
Issued for fixed assets  $0.09 per share  -   -   323,078   323   29,677   -   -   30,000 
                                 
Issued to retire notes payable  $0.09 per share  -   -   1,346,154   1,346   123,654   -   -   125,000 
                                 
Stock owed for services $0.67 per share  -   -   -   -   187,320   280   -   187,600 
                                 
Issued for cash  $0.32 per share  -   -   -   -   149,531   469   -   150,000 
                                 
Issuance of nonqualified stock options  -   -   -   -   13,160   -   -   13,160 
                                 
Issued for services  $0.38 per share  -   -   1,250,000   1,250   473,750   -   -   475,000 
                                 
Issued to employees for services  $0.25 per share  -   -   38,000   38   9,462   -   -   9,500 
           .                     
Amortization of  employee stock options  -   -   -   -   1,172,676   -   -   1,172,676 
                                 
Net loss for the year ended  December 31, 2014 (Restated)  -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,117,941)  (3,117,941)
                                 
Balance, December 31, 2014  -   -   122,845,282   122,845   3,480,934   749   (3,220,422)  384,106 
                                 
Common stock issued for cash  -   -   400,000   400   49,600   -   -   50,000 
                                 
Common stock issued for services  -   -   3,266,667   3,267   521,900   -   -   525,167 
                                 
Common stock issued for stock payable  -   -   736,077   736   -   (736)  -   - 
                                 
Common stock issued with note  -   -   100,000   100   14,286   -   -   14,386 
                                 
Beneficial conversion feature on convertible note  -   -   -   -   187,800   -   -   187,800 
                                 
Common stock issued for exchange of stock options  -   -   (2,000,000)  (2,000)  2,000   -   -   - 
                                 
Amortization of  employee stock options  -   -   -   -   19,771   -   -   19,771 
                                 
Net loss for the year ended  December 31, 2015  -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,315,407)  (1,315,407)
                                 
Balance, December 31, 2015  -  $-   125,348,026  $125,348  $4,276,291   13  $(4,535,829) $(134,177)

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020

  2021  2020 
  For the years ended 
  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Operating activities        
Net loss $1,750,589  $(934,577)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  134,371   126,474 
Amortization of discounts on notes payable  -   116,280 
Amortization of right to use  107,257   104,710 
Loan fees  -   10,665 
Gain on lease termination  -   (8,800)
Gain on settlement of accounts payable  -   (4,500)
Noncash operating lease expense        
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (1,077,289)  915,054 
Excess derivative  -   80,858 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) in accounts receivable  (5,444)  14,242 
(Increase) / decrease  in deposits and prepaid expenses  1,038   (20,236)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  100,094   175,687 
Increase (decrease) in lease obligations  (107,242)  (112,603)
Net cash provided by operating activities  903,374   463,254 
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchase of fixed assets  (66,002)  (39,470)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities  (66,002)  (39,470)
         
Financing activities        
Proceeds from notes payable  -   24,000 
Repayments on convertible notes payable - related party  (175,097)    
Repayments on convertible notes payable  (146,011)  - 
Repayments from notes payable - related party  (20,000)  (227,240)
Payments on notes payable  (78,837)  (20,907)
Net cash used in financing activities  (419,945)  (224,147)
         
Net increase in cash  417,427   199,637 
Cash - beginning  244,750   45,113 
Cash - ending $662,177  $244,750 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $400,256  $- 
Income taxes paid $-  $- 
         
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Debt discount due to derivative liability $-  $96,000 
Capitalized leased fixed assets $56,735  $- 
Common stock issued for conversion of debt and interest $10,010  $3,480 
Derivative resolution $457,572  $14,327 
Termination or lease $-  $106,178 
Accounts payable converted to notes payable - related party $-  $62,000 
Gain on the forgiveness of accrued interest - related party $522,334  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-5

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC. 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
  For the years ended 
  December 31, 
  2015  2014 
     (Restated) 
       
Operating activities      
Net loss $(1,315,407) $(3,117,941)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to        
net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  41,912   27,172 
Gain on sale of investments  -   (200,000)
Stock-based compensation expense  544,938   1,182,176 
Shares issued for services  -   662,600 
Shares issued for prepaid expenses  -   133,161 
Amortization of discounts on note payable  70,571   - 
Gain on forgiveness of notes payable  (2,000)  - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease (Increase) in accounts receivable  (8,355)  (116,892)
Decrease (Increase) in deposits and prepaid expenses  (18,169)  (2,500)
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  2,545   297,018 
Increase in  liabilities from discontinued operations  1,335   - 
(Decrease) Increase in long-term liabilities  -   691,781 
Net cash (used) by operating activities  (682,630)  (443,425)
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Issuance of notes receivable  -   (155,000)
Receipt of payments from notes receivable  46,451   108,549 
Sale of investments held to maturity  -   200,000 
Purchase of fixed assets  (3,384)  (186,610)
Purchase of fixed assets from discontinued operations  (2,782)  - 
Construction in progress  (14,824)  - 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  -   (1,098,553)
Net cash provided by investing activities  25,461   (1,131,614)
         
Financing activities        
Donated capital  -   7,106 
Repayment of notes payable  (3,617)  (41,008)
Proceeds from notes payable  75,000   166,008 
Repayment of notes payable - related party  (188,500)  (106,325)
Proceeds from notes payable - related party  113,575   394,596 
Proceeds from convertible notes payable - related party  415,000   - 
Common stock payable  -   748 
Issuances of common stock  50,000   1,362,992 
Net cash provided by financing activities  461,458   1,784,117 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (195,711)  209,078 
Cash - beginning  211,922   2,844 
Cash - ending $16,211  $211,922 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Interest paid $-  $- 
Income taxes paid $-  $- 
         
Non-cash transactions:        
Common stock issued for fixed assets $-  $30,000 
Common stock issued for stock payable $736  $- 
Discount due to common stock issued with note $14,386  $- 
Debt discount due to beneficial conversion feature $187,800  $- 
Common stock exchanged for options $2,000  $- 
Interest capitalized as construction in progress $33,762  $- 


BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2021 AND 2020

                         
      Additional      
  Preferred Stock Common Stock Paid-in Stock Accumulated Stockholders’
  Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Payable Deficit Deficit
                 
Balance, December 31, 2019  20,000,000  $20,000   7,933,574  $7,934  $8,013,954   13  $(12,487,242) $(4,445,341)
                                 
Common stock issued for conversion of debt and accrued interest        290,000   290   3,190         3,480 
                                 
Derivative resolution              14,327         14,327 
                                 
Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2020                    (934,577)  (934,577)
Balance, December 31 , 2020  20,000,000  $20,000   8,223,574  $8,224  $8,031,471   13  $(13,421,819) $(5,362,111)
                                 
Balance, December 31, 2020  20,000,000  $20,000   8,223,574  $8,224  $8,031,471   13  $(13,421,819) $(5,362,111)
                                 
Common stock issued for conversion of debt and fees        260,000   260   9,750         10,010 
                                 
Odd lot rounding from reverse stock split        1,570   2            2 
                                 
Derivative resolution              457,572         457,572 
                                 
Gain on the forgiveness of accrued interest - related party              522,333          522,333 
                                 
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021                    1,750,589   1,750,589 
Net income (loss)                    1,750,589   1,750,589 
Balance, December 31 , 2021  20,000,000  $20,000   8,485,144  $8,486  $9,021,126   13  $(11,671,230) $(2,621,605)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statementsstatements.

F-6

Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – History and organization of the company


The Company was originally organized on September 11, 2006 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as The Engraving Masters, Inc. The Company was authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of its common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each with a par value of $0.001$0.001 per share.


On March 14, 2014, the Company acquired Blue Line Protection Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation formed in February 2014 (“Blue Line Colorado”), as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Blue Line Colorado provides protection, compliance, and financial services to the lawful cannabis industry.


On March 15, 2014, the Company agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding membership interests in Blue Line Protection Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (“Blue Line LLC”).  The closing of the acquisition is to take place once the Company is provided with financial statements, audited as necessary and in proper form, which would be satisfactory for filing in an 8-K report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  If the acquisition of Blue Line LLC does not occur by July 31, 2014, the agreement pertaining to the acquisition of Blue Line LLC will terminate.  As of July 31, 2014, the terms and conditions of the agreement were not satisfied and was resultantly been terminated.

On May 2, 2014, the Company changed its name from The Engraving Masters, Inc. to Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. (“BLPG”)


On May 6, 2014, the Company effected a forward stock split and a pro-rata increase in its authorized common stock on a basis of 14-to-1, whereby each shareholder received 14 newly issued shares of common stock for each 1 share held.held. Additionally, the authorized number capital of the Company concurrently increased to 1,400,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.


Blue Line Protection Group, Inc.

On July 6, 2021, the Company effected a reverse stock split and a pro-rata decrease in its authorized common stock on a basis of 1-for-100, the authorized capital of the Company concurrently decreased to 14,000,000 shares of common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

The Company provides armed protection, financial solutions, logistics, and compliance services for businesses engaged in the legal cannabis industry. The Company offers asset logistic services, such as armored transportation service; security services, including shipment protection, money escorts, security monitoring, asset vaulting, VIP and dignitary protection, and others; financial services, such as handling transportation and storage of currency; training; and compliance services.


Note 2 – Accounting policies and procedures


Principles of consolidation


For the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 2014,2020, the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Blue Line Protection Group, Inc. (formerly The Engraving Masters, Inc.), Blue Line Advisory Services, Inc. (a Nevada corporation; “BLAS”), Blue Line Capital, Inc. (a Colorado corporation; “Blue Line Capital”), Blue Line Protection Group (California), Inc. (a California corporation; “Blue Line California”), Blue Line Colorado, Blue Line Protection Group Illinois, Inc. (an Illinois corporation; “Blue Line Illinois”), BLPG, Inc. (a Nevada corporation; “Blue Line Nevada”), Blue Line Protection Group (Washington), Inc. (a Washington corporation; “Blue Line Washington”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. BLPG and its subsidiaries are collectively referred herein to as the “Company.”


Basis of presentation


The financial statements present the balance sheets, statements of operations, stockholder’s equity (deficit) and cash flows of the Company. The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.


The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.

F-7


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Cash and cash equivalents


The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no0 cash equivalents as of December 31, 20152021 and 2014.


December 31, 2020.

Accounts receivable


Accounts receivable are stated at the amount the Company expects to collect from outstanding balances and do not bear interest. The Company provides for probable uncollectible amounts through an allowance for doubtful accounts, if an allowance is deemed necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable; however, changes in circumstances relating to accounts receivable may result in a requirement for additional allowances in the future. On a periodic basis, management evaluates its accounts receivable and determines the requirement for an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the current and collectible status of individual accounts with past due balances over 90 days. Account balances are charged against the allowance after all collection efforts have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.


Allowance for uncollectible accounts


The Company estimates losses on receivables based on known troubled accounts, if any, and historical experience of losses incurred. TheThere was 0 allowance for doubtful customer and vendor receivables was $0 and $18,864 at December 31, 20152021 and 2014, respectively.


Notes receivable

Notes receivable are measured at historical cost and reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans.  Interest income on notes receivable is recognized using the interest method.  Interest income on impaired loans is recognized as cash is collected or on a cost-recovery basis.

December 31, 2020.

Property and equipment


Property and equipment is recorded at cost and capitalized from the initial date of service. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. The Company uses other depreciation methods (generally accelerated) for tax purposes where appropriate. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment categories are as follows:

Schedule of Estimated useful Lives of Property and Equipment

Automotive Vehicles5 years 
Furniture and Equipment7 years 
Buildings and Improvements1510 years 

The Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors. Based on this assessment there was no0 impairment as December 31, 20152021 and 2014.December 31, 2020. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 2014 totaled $41,912December 31, 2020 were $134,371 and $27,172,$126,474 respectively.

F-8


Impairment of long-lived assets


The Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360-10-05, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” ASC Topic 360-10-05 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost or carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of an asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and its fair value or disposable value. As of December 31, 20152021 and 2014,December 31, 2020, the Company determined that none of its long-termlong-lived assets were impaired.


Concentration of business and credit risk


The Company has no significant off-balance sheet riskrisks such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentration of credit risks consist primarily of cash. The Company maintains its cash in bank accounts, which may at times, exceed federally insured limits.


The Company had fourone major customer which generated 22% of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2021 and one customer comprised 35% of the account receivable balance at December 31, 2021.

The Company had two major customers which generated approximately 49% (15%30%, 12%, 12%(17% and 10%13%) of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2015.


2020 and two customers (23% and 12%) comprised 35% of the account receivable balance at December 31, 2021.

Related party transactions

FASB ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures” requires companies to include in their financial statements disclosures of material related party transactions. The Company had two major customers which generated approximately 26% (15%,discloses all material related party transactions. Related parties are defined to include any principal owner, director or executive officer of the Company and 11%, )any immediate family members of total revenue in the year ended December 31, 2014.


a principal owner, director or executive officer.

Fair value of financial instruments


The carrying amounts reflected in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable and related party payables approximate the respective fair values due to the short maturities of these items. The Company does not hold any investments that are available-for-sale.


As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.


The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:


Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3:

Level 1:Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2:Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3:Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

F-9

The following table presents the derivative financial instruments, the Company’s only financial liabilities, measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value measurementhierarchy as of December 31, 2021 and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity)December 31, 2020:

December 31, 2021

Schedule of Fair Value of Liabilities Measured on Recurring Basis

  Amount  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Embedded conversion derivative liability $712,784  $-  $-  $712,784 
Warrant derivative liabilities $-  $      -  $        -  $- 
Total $712,784  $-  $-  $712,784 

December 31, 2020

  Amount  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Embedded conversion derivative liability $2,246,080  $       -  $        -  $2,246,080 
Warrant derivative liabilities $1,565  $-  $-  $1,565 
Total $2,247,645  $-  $-  $2,247,645 

The embedded conversion feature in the convertible debt instruments that the Company issued that became convertible qualified them as derivative instruments since the number of shares issuable under the notes are indeterminate based on guidance in FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. These convertible notes tainted all other equity linked instruments including outstanding warrants and fixed rate convertible debt on the date that the instrument became convertible. The valuation of the derivative liability of the warrants was determined through the use of Black Scholes option-pricing model (See Note 8).


Revenue recognition


Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when alldelivery of the promised goods or services is transferred to its customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We determine revenue recognition through the following conditions are satisfied: (1) therefive steps:

Identify the contract with the customer;
Identify the performance obligations in the contract;
Determine the transaction price;
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and
Recognize revenue when, or as, the performance obligations are satisfied.

We generate substantially all our revenue from providing services to customers. The Company records revenue when the 5 steps above have been completed.

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Accounting Standards Codification. The updated guidance states that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also provides for additional disclosures with respect to revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company adopted the standard using the modified retrospective approach effective January 1, 2018. The adoption of these standards did not have an impact on the Company’s Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.

In general, the Company’s business segmentation is persuasive evidence of an arrangement; (2) the service has been providedaligned according to the customer; (3)nature and economic characteristics. Revenue is characterized by several lines of services and typically the amountpricing is fixed.

F-10

Schedule of fees to be paidRevenue by Major Customers by Reporting Segments

Year ended December 31,
Revenue Breakdown by Streams 2021  2020 
Service: Transportation $1,775,594  $1,928,289 
Service: Currency Processing $2,800,377  $2,111,966 
Service: Compliance $83,422  $91,395 
Total $4,659,393  $4,131,650 

Gain on settlement of accounts payable

Represents a $533 and $4,500 gain on settlement of payables with vendors during the customer is fixed or determinable;years ended December 31, 2021 and (4) the collection of its fees is reasonably assured.


2020, respectively.

Advertising costs


The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. There were $30,502 and $189,536 in advertising costsAdvertising expense for the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 2014,December 31, 2020 amounted to $4,298 and $3,075, respectively.


General and administrative expenses


The significant components of general and administrative expenses consist mainly of legalrent and professional feescompensation.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation expense is recorded as a result of stock options granted in return for services rendered. Previously, the share-based payment arrangements with employees were accounted for under ASC 718, while nonemployee share-based payments issued for goods and compensation.


Stock-based compensation

services are accounted for under ASC 505-50. ASC 505-50 differs significantly from ASC 718. On June 20, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services. Under the ASU, most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees would be aligned with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. The Company records stock-basedhas adopted the new standard and has made some adjustment with regard to the share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” FASB ASC Topic 718 requires companies to measure compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation at fair value atcosts. Under the ASU 2018-07, the measurement of equity-classified nonemployee share-based payments is generally fixed on the grant date and recognize the expense overoptions are no longer revalued on each reporting date. The expenses related to the employee’s requisite service period.share-based compensation are recognized on each reporting date. The Company recognizes in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees and non-employees. The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of ASC 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”, which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date, with the measurement of such compensation being subject to periodic adjustmentamount is calculated as the underlying equity instruments vest.

difference between total expenses incurred and the total expenses already recognized.

Cost of Revenue


The Company’s cost of revenue primarily consists of labor, fuel costs and items purchased by the Company specifically purposed for the benefit of the Company’s client.clients.

F-11

Basic and Diluted Earnings per share


Net loss per share is provided in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10, “Earnings per Share”. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive loss per share excludes all potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.


For the periods presented all common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) calculations for the year ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

Schedule of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

  

Year ended

December 31, 2021

  

Year ended

December 31, 2020

 
        
Numerator:        
Net income / (loss) $1,750,589  $(934,577)
         
Denominator:        
Weighted-average shares of common stock  8,457,364   

8,016,204

 
Dilutive effect of warrants  -   - 
Dilutive effect of convertible instruments  3,875,500   - 
Diluted weighted-average of common stock  12,314,864   

8,016,204

 
         
Net income per common share from:        
Basic $0.21  $

(0.12

)
Diluted $0.14  $(0.12)

Dividends


The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid or declared since inception.


Income Taxes


The Company follows FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (ASC 740-10-25) for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.


Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

F-12

Restatement

On April 8,

Recent Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which will amend current lease accounting to require lessees to recognize (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. This standard was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company determined thatelected the practical expedient under ASU 2018-11 “Leases: Targeted Improvements” which allows the Company to apply the transition provision for Topic 842 at the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 should no longer be relied upon since the expense for the fair value of the stock options vested upon grant was incorrectly amortizedadoption date instead of being expensed duringat the year.

The effects of the restatement on the Company’s financial statements as of, and for the year ended December 31, 2014, are following:

Balance Sheet
  As Previously  Effect of  As 
  Reported  Restatement  Restated 
Additional paid-in capital $2,788,934  $692,000  $3,480,934 
Accumulated (Deficit) $(2,528,422)  $(692,000)  $(3,220,422) 

Consolidated Statement of Operations         
  As Previously  Effect of  As 
  Reported  Restatement  Restated 
Stock based compensation $480,675  $692,000  $1,172,675 
Net loss $(2,425,941) $(692,000) $(3,117,941)
Net loss per share – basic $(0.02) $(0.01) $(0.03)
Net loss per share – fully diluted $(0.02) $(0.01) $(0.03)
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity         
  As Previously  Effect of  As 
  Reported  Restatement  Restated 
Additional paid-in capital $2,788,934  $692,000  $3,480,934 
Accumulated (Deficit) $(2,528,422) $(692,000) $(3,220,422)
             
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows            
  As Previously  Effect of  As 
  Reported  Restatement  Restated 
Operating activities            
Net loss $(2,425,941  $(692,000) $(3,117,941)
Stock based compensation expense $490,176  $692,000  $1,182,176 
Contingencies

On December 28, 2015 the Company’s former CFO resigned. Mr. Deparini purports his resignation was made pursuant to a termination clause for other than cause if he is required to undertake other responsibilities other then set forth in his employment agreement. Mr., Deparini claims through the date of his resignation he is owed a total of $154,000 in accrued compensation, $575 in accrued authorized expenses and the remaining balance of his base salary as definedearliest comparative period presented in the employment agreement in the amount of $179,000. As of December 31, 2015financial statements. Therefore, the Company has accrued a totalrecognized and measured leases existing at January 1, 2019 but without retrospective application. Therefore, there was no impact recorded to beginning retained earnings or the statement of $125,575. If litigation is commenced the Company will attempt a reasonable out-of-court settlement and if such efforts are not successful, will vigorously defend the litigation.

On November 6, 2015 Daniel Sullivan sent a wage claim demand. Mr. Sullivan purports to have had an Independent Contractor Agreement with the Company which provides he is entitled to certain compensation and to be reimbursed for Company expenses. The demand claims unpaid compensation in the amount of $8,055 and unreimbursed expenses in the amount of $154,409. The Company denies the agreement was ever signed. As of December 31, 2015 the Company accrued a total of $88,968. If litigation is commenced the Company will attempt a reasonable out-of-court settlement and if such efforts are not successful, will vigorously defend the litigation.

Mile High Real Estate Group, an entity owned by Mr. Sullivan, sent correspondence stating the Mr. Sullivan and/or Mile High Real Estate loaned the Company either directly or directly to contractors, material suppliers or utilities for operating and building remodeling in the amount of $98,150. Counsel for Mr. Sullivan stated that he was still compiling information. The Company is investigating whether Mr. Sullivan and/or Mile High Real Estate Group ever made the alleged loans. If the alleged loan was actually made the Company will seek an out-of-court settlement. As of December 31, 2015 the Company accrued a total of $98,150.

Leases
On February 15, 2014 the company entered into a sublease agreement for approximately 2,000 square feet of office space on a month to month basis contingent on the lessor’s master lease for the premises.  The lease amount adjusts yearly and the current lease is $1,613.56 per month.
On July 30, 2015 the company entered into a month to month lease for approximately 1,500 square feet to be used for training.
Recent pronouncements

operations

The Company evaluated all other recent accounting pronouncements issued and determined that the adoption of these pronouncements would not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


Note 3 - Going concern


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,315,407 for the year ended December 31, 2015accumulated deficit and had a working capital deficit of $1,422,172 as of December 31, 2015.2021. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern.


In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. The Company is significantly dependent upon its ability, and will continue to attempt, to secure additional equity and/or debt financing. The Company is currently conducting a private placement of its common stock to raise proceeds to finance its plan of operation.  There are no assurances that the Company will be successful and without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

Note 4 – Deposits Commitments and notes receivable


contingencies

Contingencies

On May 20, 2014,November 6, 2015, Daniel Sullivan sent a wage claim demand to the Company. Mr. Sullivan purports to have had an Independent Contractor Agreement with the Company which provides he is entitled to certain compensation and to be reimbursed for Company expenses. The demand claims unpaid compensation in the amount of $8,055 and unreimbursed expenses in the amount of $154,409. The Company denies the agreement was ever signed. If litigation is commenced the Company will defend any claims by Mr. Sullivan.

Mile High Real Estate Group, an entity owned by Mr. Sullivan, sent correspondence to the Company stating the Mr. Sullivan and/or Mile High Real Estate loaned the Company either directly or directly to contractors, material suppliers or utilities for operating and building remodeling in the amount of $98,150. Counsel for Mr. Sullivan stated that he was still compiling information. The Company is investigating whether Mr. Sullivan and/or Mile High Real Estate Group ever made the alleged loans. The Company will defend any claims of Mile High Real Estate Group.

On April 14, 2016, the Company entered into a Security Deposit Agreementan agreement with a third-party fuel credit provider, wherebyan unrelated third party to provide the Company was obligatedwith investor relations services. Upon signing the agreement, the Company paid the investor relations consultant $75,000 and agreed to issue the consultant 1,500,000 shares of its restricted common stock. The agreement required the Company to pay the consultant an initial security deposit inadditional $75,000 prior to June 14, 2016. The Company cancelled the amount of $2,500.  The balanceagreement and is of the Deposit, asopinion that the shares are not owed to the consultant. As of December 31, 20152021 and 2014December 31, 2020 there was $2,500.0 payable recorded.

F-13

The Company provides short-term, secured financing to clients, represented as notes receivable.

During the year ended December 31, 2014,2020 the Company loanedrecorded a totalgain of $105,000$4,500 for settlement of a vendor payable.

Finance leases

On July 25, 2017, the Company recorded a finance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $29,390. The Company agreed to make 48 monthly payment of $621.23 including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a non-affiliated entityfinance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying asset. As of December 31, 2021 the lease had been fully paid.

On April 25, 2018, the Company recorded a revolving basisfinance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $38,388. The Company made a down payment of $7,500 and agreed to make 36 monthly payment of $976.71 including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a finance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying asset. As of December 31, 2021 the lease had been fully paid.

On August 16, 2018, the Company recorded a finance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $58,476. The Company made a down payment of $20,000 and an additional $10,000 for delivery fees, taxes and its first month payment and agreed to make 36 monthly payments of $1,165.10, including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a finance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying asset. As of December 31, 2021 the lease had been fully paid.

On August 16, 2018, the Company recorded a finance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $58,476. The Company made a down payment of $20,000 and an additional $10,000 for delivery fees, taxes and its first month payment and agreed to make 36 monthly payments of $1,165.10, including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a finance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying asset. As of December 31, 2021 the lease had been fully paid.

On March 1, 2019, the Company recorded finance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $64,354. The Company made a down payment of $30,000 which included delivery fees, taxes and its first month payment and agreed to make 36 monthly payments of $1,129.76, including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a finance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying assets.

On June 2, 2021, the Company recorded finance lease obligation for a leased a vehicle for $56,733. The Company made a down payment of $3,510 which included delivery fees, taxes and its first month payment and agreed to make 24 monthly payments of $2,765.19, including sales tax. The Company recognized this arrangement as a finance lease based on the determination that the lease exceeded 75% of the economic life of the underlying assets

Schedule of Future Minimum Leases Payments

Future minimum lease payments as December 31, 2021   
    
2022 $29,301 
Thereafter  16,402 
Total minimum lease payments $45,703 

Operating Leases

On October 27, 2016 the Company sold its building located at a rate5765 Logan Street Denver, Colorado to an unrelated third party for $1,400,000. The Company repaid the mortgage on the building in the amount of 18% per annum and due within one year$677,681. After the sale, the Company leased the building from the datepurchaser of issuance.the property. The borrower repaidlease is for an initial term of ten years, with the entire $105,000 balanceCompany having the option to extend the term of the lease for two additional five-year periods. The lease requires rental payments of $10,000 per month which will increase 2% annually. The Company paid a $30,000 deposit at the inception of the lease

F-14

On May 29, 2018 the Company leased a building located at 4328 E. Magnolia Street, Phoenix, Arizona. The lease is for an initial term of one year, with the Company having the option to extend the term of the lease for additional four year periods. The lease requires rental payments of $3,880 per month which will increase 2% annually. The Company paid a $4,369 deposit at the inception of the lease.

On January 22, 2019 the Company leased a building located at 7490 Bridgewater Road, Huber Heights, Ohio. The lease is for an initial term of 63 months. The lease requires rental payments of $3,200 per month and interest accrued thereupon duringwill increase to $3,400 between months 28 through 63. The Company paid a $3,200 deposit at the inception of the lease. During the year ended December 31, 2014. As2020 the Company terminated the lease agreement. The Company paid a $35,760 cancellation fee included in rent expense and recorded a gain of $8,800 on the termination of the lease.

The Company adopted ASC 842 and recorded right of use asset and operating lease liability of $1,082,241 The Company used 12% as incremental borrowing rate as is the average interest rate of the Company’s outstanding third party note. The lease agreement gives the Company the option to renew it for two additional 5 year terms but the Company did not consider it likely to exercise that option. Therefore, the Company did not include such amounts in its computations of the present value of remaining lease payment on the adoption date.

Supplemental balance sheet information related to leases is as follows:

Schedule of Operating Leases

December 31, 2021

Operating Leases Classification December 31, 2021 
Right-of-use assets Operating right of use assets $529,711 
Total   $529,711 
Current lease liabilities Current operating lease liabilities $125,266 
Non-current lease liabilities Long-term operating lease liabilities $440,366 
Total   $565,632 

Lease term and discount rate were as follows:

Summary of Operating Lease Liabilities

December 31, 2021
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)3.50
Weighted average discount rate12%

The following summarizes lease expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021:

Summary of Lease Expenses

Finance lease expenses:

Depreciation/amortization expense $107,257 
Interest on lease liabilities  77,121 
Finance lease expense $184,378 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information related to leases were as follows:

Schedule of Cash Flow Information Related to Lease

  December 31, 2021 
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities $107,242 
Operating right of use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities $0 

F-15

Maturities of lease liabilities were as follows as of December 31, 20142021:

Schedule of Maturities of Lease Liabilities

  Operating Leases 
    
2022 $186,453 
2023 $158,298 
2024 $138,532 
2025 $141,302 
2026 $107,558 
2027   
Total $732,143 
Less: Imputed interest $(166,511)
Present value of lease liabilities $565,632 

December 31, 2020

Operating Leases Classification December 31, 2020 
Right-of-use assets Operating right of use assets $636,968 
Total   $636,968 
Current lease liabilities Current operating lease liabilities $107,242 
Non-current lease liabilities Long-term operating lease liabilities $565,632 
Total   $672,874 

Lease term and discount rate were as follows:

December 31, 2020
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)4.50
Weighted average discount rate12%

The following summarizes lease expenses for the principal balanceyear ended December 31, 2020:

Finance lease expenses:

Depreciation/amortization expense $118,291 
Interest on lease liabilities $101,934 
Finance lease expense $220,225 

Supplemental disclosures of the loan is $0 and interest income recognized was $121.


On May 15, 2014, the Company loaned $50,000cash flow information related to a non-affiliated entity on a revolving basis at a rateleases were as follows:

  December 31, 2020 
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities $216,587 
Operating right of use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities $0 

Maturities of 18% per annum and due within one year from the date of issuance. Aslease liabilities were as follows as of December 31, 2014, the principal balance of the loan is $46,451 and accrued interest thereupon was $834. The outstanding balance was collected during 2015.2020:

  Operating Leases 
    
2021 $182,267 
2022 $186,453 
2023 $158,298 
2024 $138,532 
2025 $141,302 
2026 $107,558 
 Total $914,410 
 Less: Imputed interest $(241,536)
Present value of lease liabilities $672,874 

F-16


Note 5 – Fixed assets

Machinery and construction in progress


Fixed assetsequipment consisted of the following at:
  December 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
       
Automotive vehicles $173,926  $173,926 
Furniture and equipment  46,068   44,204 
Fixed assets, total  219,994   218,130 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (69,084)  (28,692)
Fixed assets, net $150,910  $189,438 

Schedule of Machinery and Equipment

  December 31, 2021  December 31, 2020 
       
Automotive vehicles $485,701  $398,614 
Furniture and equipment $108,265  $85,435 
Machinery and Equipment $135,706  $135,706 
Leasehold improvements $141,234  $128,414 
Fixed assets, total $870,906  $748,169 
Total: accumulated depreciation $(586,130) $(451,759)
Fixed assets, net $284,776  $296,410 

Depreciation expensesexpense for the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 2014 were $41,912 and $27,172, respectively.


On July 15, 2014, the Company purchased a commercial building for a total purchase price of $750,000, for which the Company paid a down payment of $75,000 and financed the remaining $675,000 in the form of a promissory note.  The note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum on the unpaid principal balance and is due in full on July 31, 2016.  Interest is paid monthly, in arrears, in the amount of $2,813 beginning August 31, 2014.  Through December 31, 2015, approximately $363,377 in capital improvements2020 were $134,371 and $33,762 of capitalized expenses have been made to the property.  As of December 31, 2015, the Company has not yet completed the construction on the property and it was not available and ready for use, accordingly, no depreciation expense has been recorded. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the balance of construction in progress was $1,147,139 and $1,098,553,$126,474 respectively.

Note 6 – Discontinued Operations

Effective September 30, 2015,Notes payable

Notes payable to non-related parties

On January 5, 2016, the Company ceased operations of Blue Line Advisory Services, Inc. 


The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations and the lossborrowed $10,000 from discontinued operations:
  December 31, 2015  December 31. 2014 
       
Assets of discontinued operations:        
Fixed assets 2,782   
Total assets held for disposal  2,782    
         
Liabilities of discontinued operations:        
Accounts payable  1,335    
Total liabilities held for disposal $1,335  $ 
Income and Expenses of Discontinued Operations
    For the Period from 
  For the Year April 22, 2014 
  Ended (Inception) to 
  December 31, 2015 June 30, 2014 
      
Revenue $67,920  __ 
Costs of revenue $52,222  __ 
General and administrative expenses $70,604  $ 
Loss from discontinued operations $(54,906) $ 
Note 7 – Notes payable

Through December 31, 2014, a non-affiliated third-party loaned the Company an aggregate of $2,000 in cash. The note bears no interest and is due upon demand. During 2015, the note was forgiven resulting in a gain on the forgiveness of debt of $2,000.

On February 21, 2014, the Company issued a Promissory Note to one non-affiliated person in the amount of $100,000.non-related party. The loan was due and payable on demandJanuary 5, 2017 and bore no interest. In April 2014,interest at 5% per annum and has a 5% per month penalty upon default. The due date was extended to January 1, 2022. During the lender agreed to convert the entire principal balance of $100,000, into 1,076,923 shares of common stock. As ofyear ended December 31, 2014 and 2015,2021 the Company repaid $10,000. The principal balance owed on this loan is $0.

at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $0 and $10,000, respectively.

On February 21, 2014,May 15, 2019 the Company issuedentered in a Promissory Note to one non-affiliated entity in12% promissory loan with Helix Funding, LLC for the principle amount of $25,000.$100,000. The note matures on November 1, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company repaid $100,000 of principle. As of December 31, 2020 the remaining balance on the note is $0.

Convertible notes payable to non-related parties

On October 18, 2017, the Company borrowed $150,000 from an unrelated third party. The Company paid $15,250 of fees associated with the loan, which was recorded as discount and to be amortized over the term of the debt and was fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The loan was duebears interest at a rate of 10% (default interest 24%) and payable on demand and bore no interest. In April 2014,has a maturity date of July 16, 2018. The Holder has the lender agreedoption to convert the entireoutstanding principal and accrued interest into common stock of the Company. The conversion price is the lesser of (1) lowest trading price during the previous 25 days prior to the note agreement or (2) 50% lowest trading price during the 25 days prior to conversion. Covenants: The Borrower shall not, without the Holder’s consent, sell, lease or dispose of any significant portion of its assets outside the ordinary course of business. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company paid $150,000 to extend the maturity date until May 11, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid $75,000 in extension fees. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 8 for details) and the discount of $134,750 is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method which was fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019 the holder converted $39,478 of accrued interest into 2,178,825 shares of common stock resulting in a loss of $61,624. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 the balance outstanding on the loan is $0 and $150,000, respectively. On May 28, 2021 the Company entered into a settlement and release agreement with the borrower and agreed to pay them discuss additional amount bounded to interest expense for the settlement $400,000. The First payment of $25,000,$200,000 was due upon signing and Company agreed to make additional $100,000 payments on the 30th and 60th day after signing. The additional $250,000 settlement was record as interest during the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021 accrued interest and the note balance had been repaid.

F-17

On March 21, 2018, the Company borrowed $45,000 from an unrelated third party. The Company paid $4,500 of fees associated with the loan and had amortized $3,514 of the costs as of December 31, 2018. The note bears an interest rate: 12% (default interest lesser of 15% or maximum permitted by law) and matures on March 21, 2019. The conversion Feature Convertible immediately after the issuance, the Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into 269,231 common stock of the Company. The Conversion price is 55% of the lowest trading price during the 25 Trading Day periods prior to the Conversion. Covenants: The Borrower shall not, without the Holder’s consent, sell, lease or dispose of any significant portion of its assets outside the ordinary course of business. The note was discounted for a derivative (see note 8 for details) and the discount of $40,500 is being amortized over the life of the note using the effective interest method resulting in $31,623 of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2019 $23,223 of principle and interest were converted into 841,602 shares of common stock resulting in a loss of $32,858. During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company recorded amortization expense of $9,863. On September 18, 2020 Crown Bridge Partners, LLC converted notes payable in the principal amount of $2,980 and $500 of fees into 29,000,000 shares of common stock. No gain or loss was recorded and conversions were made per the terms of agreement. On February 28, 2021 Crown Bridge Partners, LLC converted notes payable in the principal amount of $9,510 and $500 of fees into 26,000,000 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company repaid the remaining principle balance of $9,708. As of December 31, 20142021 and 2015,December 31, 2020 there was a balance remaining on the principal balance owed on this loan is $0.


On March 26, 2014,of $0 and $19,218, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company issued a Promissory recognized amortization expense of $0 and $8,710 of discount from derivative liabilities.

Note to one non-affiliated person in the amount of $25,000 for cash paid to purchase a vehicle on behalf of the Company. The loan was due and payable on demand and bore no interest. The loan was repaid in full. As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $0.


During April 2014, the Company borrowed $16,008 from a non-affiliated person. The loan was due and payable on demand and bore no interest. The loan was repaid in full. As of December 31, 2014 and 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $0.

During February 2015, the Company borrowed $50,000 from a non-affiliated person.  The loan was due and payable on demand with interest at 10% per annum. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $50,000.

During April 2015, the Company borrowed $25,000 from a non-affiliated person.  The loan was due and payable on demand and bore interest at 6% and has a 5% penalty upon default. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan was $25,000.

Note 87Notes payable – related party

parties

On July 31, 2014, the Company borrowed $98,150 $98,150 from an entity materially controlled by ana former officer and shareholder of the Company. The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest. As of December 31, 20152021 and 2014,December 31, 2020, the principal balance owed on this loan is $98,150.


$98,150 and $98,150, respectively.

As of December 31, 2014, a related party loaned the Company an aggregate of $10,000,$10,000, in the form of cash and expenses paid on behalf of the Company. The loan is due and payable on demandJanuary 1, 2022 and bears no interest. During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company borrowed an additional $20,000 and as$20,000. During the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company repaid $30,000 of principle. As of December 31, 20152021 and 2014,December 31, 2020, the principal balance owed on this loan was $30,000$0 and $10,000,$30,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2014, a related party loaned the Company an aggregate of $180,122,$180,121, in the form of cash and expenses paid on behalf of the Company. The loan is due and payable on demand and bears no interest. The Company repaid $125,500$125,500 towards this note during 2015 and as of December 31, 20152021 and 2014,December 31, 2020; the principal balance owed on this loan was $54,622$54,621 and $180,122,$54,621, respectively.

As of December 31, 2021 the Company owed Hypur Inc. $688,500 plus accrued interest. The amounts owed to Hypur were represented by eight Promissory Notes dated between September 20, 2016 and September 3, 2019. By an agreement effective January 31, 2022 the Company and Hypur agreed to the following:

On March 3, 2022 the Company paid Hypur $137,500, which was applied to principal of the notes.
On or before each date shown below, the Company will pay Hypur $12,500, which will apply to principal of the notes.

Schedule of Related Parties Debt Maturity

Date Amount 
    
March 31, 2022 $12,500 
     
April 30, 2022 $12,500 
     
May 31, 2022 $12,500 
     
June 30, 2022 $12,500 

F-18

On or before July 31, 2022 the Company will pay Hypur $137,500, which will apply to principal of the notes.
All principal amounts owed to Hypur under the Promissory Notes will bear interest at 7.5% per year between January 31, 2022 and July 31, 2022 as long as the Company is not in default under the terms of its agreement with Hypur.
If by July 31, 2022 all payments required by the Company’s agreement with Hypur have been made in a timely fashion, Hypur will forgive $250,000 of accrued interest owed by the Company under the Promissory Notes.
After July 31, 2022 future payment plans will be negotiated, provided however that any principal amounts owed to Hypur under the Promissory Notes after July 31, 2022 will not bear interest in excess of 7.5% per year with a default rate of 12% per year.
Hypur will waive any default rights between January 31, 2022 and August 31, 2022 on a month-to-month basis so long as all payments required by the Company’s agreement with Hypur have been made.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company repaid Patrick Deparini $575.

Convertible notes payable to related parties

On November 13, 2015, the Company borrowed $20,000$25,000 from an entity materially controlled byHypur Inc., which is a shareholder of the Company.related party. The loan is due and payable on demandNovember 12, 2015 and bears no interest.interest at 18% per annum. If an Event of Default remains uncured after 30 days Holder has the option to convert the outstanding principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest, into unrestricted $0.001 par value common stock of the Borrower. Upon default the note bears a default rate of interest of 24% per annum as part of the default terms of this note. During 2015,the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company repaid the amount owed of $20,000.


During 2015, the company borrowed $43,575 from the former CFO. As of December 31, 2015 $43,000 of the loan had been repaid. As of December 31, 2015 the principal amount owed is $575.$25,000. The note is non-interest bearing, due on demand and outstanding as of December 31, 2015.

During October 2015, the Company borrowed $30,000 from an entity materially controlled by an officer of the Company. The loan was due and payable on demand and is non-interest bearing. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $30,000.

Convertible notes payable to related party
$0 and $25,000, respectively.

In JulyNovember 2015, the Company entered into an arrangement with a related party, whereby the Company could borrow up to $500,000borrowed $25,000 in Convertible Notes. The Convertible Note bears interest at a rate of 5%5% per annum and payable quarterly in arrears and matures twelve months from the date of issuance, and is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a per share conversion price equal $25K repayment is for OMB to $0.025. Through$0.025. The note was due on November 4, 2016. In December 2015 the lender loaned the Company an additional $20,000 with same terms except that it is payable upon demand. The holder of the note has agreed to extend the default date of the note to January 1, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2015,2021 the Company borrowed a totalrepaid $45,000 of $415,000.principal and $6,767 of accrued interest. As of December 31, 2015,2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company owed a total of $0 and $45,000, respectively.

On September 1, 2016, the Company entered into, an convertible promissory note with Hypur Ventures, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Hypur Ventures”) which is a related party pursuant to which the Company to borrow $75,000. The loan was due 180 days from the date of issuance and bears interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The note is mandatory redeemable into common stock if the price per share is over $.50 per share during a 10 day period. The principal balance owed on this Convertibleloan at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $75,000 and $75,000, respectively. Upon default, the note bears a default rate of interest of 15% per annum, and if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Hyper has waived the default provision until January 1, 2022.

F-19

On October 14, 2016, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note with Hypur Ventures, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Hypur Ventures”) and a related party, pursuant to which the Company borrowed $100,000. The loan was due 180 days from the date of issuance and bears interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The note is mandatory redeemable into common stock if the price per share is over $.50 per share during a 10 day period. The principal balance owed on this loan at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $100,000 and $100,000, respectively. Upon default, the note bears a default rate of interest of 15% per annum, and if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Hyper has waived the default provision until January 1, 2022.

On March 7, 2017, the Company borrowed $100,000 from Hypur Ventures, L.P., a related party. The loan is due 180 days from March 7, 2017 and bears interest at 10% per annum. The loan is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $.05 per share. The loan will automatically convert into shares of the Company’s common stock if the price of the Company’s common stock is over $.50 per share during any ten-day period. The principal balance owed on this loan December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was $100,000 and $100,000 respectively. Upon default, the note bears a default rate of interest of 15% per annum, and if the default has not been remedied within 30 days, the redemption price would be 150% of the principal amount. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, Hyper has waived the default provision until January 1, 2022.

As of December 31, 2021 the Company owed CGDK, LLC $1,185,217, plus accrued interest of $452,246. The amount owed to CGDK was represented by seven Promissory Notes dated between July 9, 2015 and August 6, 2018. CGDK agreed to (i) consolidate the Promissory Notes into a new note in the principal amount of $1,185,217 and (ii) forgive the accrued interest of $452,246. The new Promissory Note is $415,000.

due and payable on December 31, 2026 and bears an interest (from January 1, 2022 to the date of payment) of 5% per year.

As of December 31, 2021 the Company owed MKM Capital Advisors and two related entities $128,600 plus accrued interest of $70,088.08. The amount owed to the MKM entities was represented by three Promissory Notes dated between February 6, 2015 and July 7, 2016. MKM entities agreed to (i) consolidate the Promissory Notes into a new note in the principal amount of $128,600 and (ii) forgive the accrued interest of $457,572. The new Promissory Note is due and payable on December 27, 2026 and bears an interest (from December 27, 2021 to the date of payment) of 5% per year.

The Company evaluatedre-measured the convertible notefair value of derivative liabilities on December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020. See Note 8.

Note 8 – Derivative Liability

The Company analyzed the conversion options for possible embedded derivativesderivative accounting consideration under ASC 815, Derivatives and concludedHedging, and determined that none exist. However, the Company concluded a portion of the notean instrument should be allocated to additional paid-in capitalclassified as a beneficialliability when a conversion feature atoption becomes effective.

The derivative liability in connection with the issuance date, since the conversion price on that date was lower than the fair market value of the underlying stock. Resultantly, a discount of $187,800 was attributed to the beneficial conversion feature of the note, which amountconvertible debt is being amortized throughmeasured using level 3 inputs.

F-20

The change in the maturity datefair value of derivative liabilities is as follows:

Schedule of Derivative Liabilities at Fair Value

Balance - December 31, 2019 $1,170,060 
Settlement of derivatives upon conversion $(14,327)
Debt discount from derivative liability $176,858 
Loss on change in fair value of the derivative $915,054 
Balance - December 31, 2020 $2,247,645 
Settlement of derivatives upon conversion $(457,572)
Gain on change in fair value of the derivative $(1,077,289)
Balance – December 31, 2021 $712,784 

The table below shows the note. AsBlack-Scholes option-pricing model inputs used by the Company to value the derivative liability at each measurement date:

Schedule of December 31, 2015, a total of $56,185 has been amortized and recorded as interest expense, leaving a balance of $131,615 in discounts related to the beneficial conversion feature of this note. The carrying amount of the convertible note, net of the unamortized debt discount, was $283,385 and $0 as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.


Derivative Instruments, Black-Scholes Option-pricing Model Inputs Used

   Year ended
December 31, 2021
   Year ended
December 31, 2020
 
Expected term  0.251.09 years   0.081.01 years 
Expected average volatility  138.34% – 162.05%  291.56% – 378.27%
Expected dividend yield  0   0 
Risk-free interest rate  0.06 % – 0.39%  0.08% – 0.15%

Note 9 – Long term notes payable


On July 15, 2014, the Company purchased a commercial building for a total purchase price of $750,000, for which the Company paid a down payment of $75,000 and financed the remaining $675,000 in the form of a promissory note.  The note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum on the unpaid principal balance and is due in full on July 31, 2016.  Interest is paid monthly, in arrears, in the amount of $2,813 beginning August 31, 2014.  As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance is $675,000 and a total of $49,292 in interest payments have been made.

On November 21, 2014, the Company purchased a vehicle for a purchase price of $20,827, net of discounts.  The Company financed the entire amount of $20,827 at an interest rate of 2.42% for five years, with a maturity date of December 5, 2019.  As of December 31, 2015, the total principal balance of the note is $16,898, of which $12,836 is considered a long-term liability and the current portion of $4,062 is considered a current liability.

Note 10 - Stockholders’ equity

deficit

The Company was originally authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock and 100,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. On May 6, 2014, the Company effected a forward stock split and a pro-rata increase in its authorized common stock on a basis of 14-to-1, whereby each shareholder received 14 newly issued shares of common stock for each 1 share held. Additionally, the number of authorized shares increased to 1,400,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the condensedconsolidated financial statements and these notes thereto have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

On July 6, 2021, the Company effected a reverse stock split and a pro-rata decrease in its authorized common stock on a basis of 1-for-100, the authorized capital of the Company concurrently decreased to 14,000,000 shares of common stock. All references to share and per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto have been retroactively restated to reflect the forward stock split.

From March 24 through March 27, 2014, the Company sold an aggregate of 13,068,050 shares of its common stock for gross cash proceeds of $1,213,501.

On March 27, 2014, the Company purchased a vehicle from a non-affiliated entity with 323,078 shares of its common stock in lieu of cash. The value of this transaction was $30,000.

On April 8, 2014, the Company issued a total of 1,076,9231,570 shares of common stock fordue to rounding on the conversion of a promissory notereverse stock split.

Common stock

On February 28, 2021, Crown Bridge Partners, LLC converted notes payable in the totalprincipal amount of $100,000.


On April 8, 2014, the Company issued a total $9,510 and $500 of 269,231 fees into 260,000 shares of common stock.

Preferred stock for the conversion of a promissory note in the total amount of $25,000.


On June 11, 2014,May 3, 2016, the Company entered into, an investment banking agreement forwith Hypur Ventures, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Hypur Ventures”) which it was obligatedis a related party pursuant to issue 280,000which the Company sold to Hypur Ventures, in a private placement, 10,000,000 shares of itsthe Company’s preferred stock and 5,000,000 common stock warrants with a fair market valuefive year term and an exercise price of $187,600.$0.10, at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for gross proceeds of $500,000. The stock was subscribed for; however, the certificates representing the shares were not issued as of December 31, 2014 and, resultantly, are considered owed as a common stock payable of $280.

On September 15, 2014, the Company received a subscription for 468,750 shares of its commonpreferred stock for $150,000. The stock was subscribed for; however, the certificates representing the shares were not issued as of December 31, 2014 and, resultantly, are considered owed as a common stock payable of $469.

On October 22, 2014, the Company enteredconvertible into an investment banking agreement, for which it issued 1,250,000 shares of itsthe Company’s common stock. The preferred stock shall have such other rights, preferences and privileges to be set forth in a certificate of designation to be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ASC 470-20-30 and determined it contained a fair market value of $475,000.

On December 24, 2014, the Company issued 38,000 shares of its common stock to various employees under its employee stock incentive program.beneficial conversion feature. The fairintrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was determined to be $114,229. The beneficial conversion feature was fully amortized and recorded as a deemed dividend.

F-21

Between July and August of 2016 Hypur Ventures purchased an additional 10,000,000shares onof the dateCompany’s preferred stock and 5,000,000 common stock warrants with a five year term and an exercise price of issuance$0.10, at a purchase price of $0.05 per share for net proceeds of $445,000, net of legal fees of $55,000. The shares of preferred stock are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The preferred stock shall have such other rights, preferences and privileges to be set forth in a certificate of designation to be filed with the Nevada Secretary of State. The Company evaluated the convertible preferred stock under FASB ASC 470-20-30 and determined it does not contain a beneficial conversion feature. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was $9,500.


Duringdetermined to be $0. The preferred stock is convertible at any time at the year ended December 31, 2015election of Hypur Ventures. The preferred stock shall automatically convert to common stock if the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $.50 per share over any consecutive twenty day trading period. The preferred stock terms include a one-time purchase price preference. No preferential dividends apply to the preferred stock. The preferred stock attributes include weighted average anti-dilution protection, rights to appoint one director, pre-emptive rights to purchase future offerings of securities by the Company, solddemand and piggy-back registration rights.

The preferred stock is convertible at any time at the election of Hypur Ventures. The preferred stock shall automatically convert to common stock if the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $.50 per share over any consecutive twenty day trading period. The preferred stock terms include a totalone-time purchase price preference. No preferential dividends apply to the preferred stock. The preferred stock attributes include weighted average anti-dilution protection, rights to appoint one director, pre-emptive rights to purchase future offerings of 400,000securities by the Company, demand and piggy-back registration rights.

The Company has reserved thirty million shares of common stock for cash in the amount of $50,000 ($.125 per share).


During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company issued a total of 3,226,667 shares of common stock to various employees and consultant valued at $526,167 as compensation ($.161 per share)

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company issued a total of 100,000 shares of common stock as additional consideration on a note payable valued at $14,386 ($.144 per share). The $14,386 was recognized as a discount to the note which was fully amortized to interest expense during 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company exchanged 2, 000,000 shares of common stock for stock options.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 736,077 shares of our common stock for shares committed tothat may be issued during 2014. This amount had previously been recorded as a common stock payable.

Restricted Stock Units
The Company measures all employee share-based payment awards using a fair-value method. The Company has a policy of issuing new shares to satisfy stock option exercises and issuance of stock awards. A summaryupon the conversion and/or exercise of the Company’s Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) activitypreferred stock and related information for 2015 and 2014 is as follow:
  
 
Number
Of RSUs
  
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value Per Share
 
         
Balance at December 31, 2014  0  $0.00 
Granted  9,050,000  $0.16 
Vested  3,266,667  $0.16 
Cancelled  (5,783,333) $0.16 
Balance at December 31, 2015  --  $0.16 
On April 24, 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its commonwarrants. The preferred stock as Restricted Stock Unitssold to a director of a subsidiary company as compensation. During 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with this subsidiary director, whereby,Hypur Ventures will be subject to the terms and conditions of the settlement, the parties mutually rescinded all prior existing agreements between them,Certificate of Designation, as well as all compensatory arrangements set forth therein and the director returned 750,000 sharesfurther documentation to the Company for cancellation. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $42,500of share-based compensation expense related to the shares vested under the original director agreement.
On May 1, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,050,000 shares of its common stock as Restricted Stock Units to employees as incentive compensation. During 2015, the Company entered into Settlement Agreementsbe drafted in accordance with certain of these employees, whereby, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements, the parties mutually rescinded all prior existing agreementsagreed upon between them, as well as all compensatory arrangements set forth therein and returned 1,033,333 shares to the Company for cancellation. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $162.667 of share-based compensation expense related to the shares vested under the original employment agreements.
On May 1, 2015, the Company issued Restricted Stock Units to an employee pursuant to the satisfaction of performance conditions of his employment agreement. The employee is eligible to earn up to an aggregate of 6,000,000 restricted stock units in accordance with the following schedule: (a) 2,000,000 shares upon the Company realizing consolidated revenue of $1,000,000 and (b) an additional 2,000,000 shares for each additional $1,000,000 of consolidated revenue up to a maximum of an additional 4,000,000 shares. As of May 1, 2015, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of its common stock to this employee. The fair market value of the common stock on the date of issuance was $0.16 per share. The Company recognized compensation expense in the amount of $320,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015. This award was modified during November 2015Hypur Ventures.

Note 10 – Options and the 2,000,000 previously issued common shares were exchanged for 4,500,000 common stock options.

Total stock-based compensation expense in connection with restricted stock units granted to employees recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $525,167and $0, respectively.

Note 11 – Warrants and options

warrants

Options

All stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated using a Black-ScholesBlack-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. The Company has not paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Company uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model. Volatility is an estimate based on the calculated historical volatility of similar entities in industry, in size and in financial leverage, whose share prices are publicly available. The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. The Company has no historical experience with which to establish a basis for determining an expected life of these awards. Therefore, the Company only gave consideration to the contractual terms and did not consider the vesting schedules, exercise patterns and pre-vesting and post-vesting forfeitures significant to the expected life of the option award. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award. In 2014,

All of the options granted by the Company used a volatility ranging from 256.35% to 264.57%, risk free rate ranging from 1.52% to 1.80%, an expected term of 5 years and zero expected dividends. In 2015, the Company used a volatility ranging from 260% to 265%, risk free rate ranging from 1.37% to 1.62%, an expected term of 5 years and zero expected dividends. 


Asexpired as of December 31, 2013, there were no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock.

On March 1, 2014, the Company issued stock options to an officer of the Company to purchase 4,806,900 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.  The options vest in three annual installments, with the first portion immediately vested.  The options carry a life of five years.

On April 1, 2014, the Company issued stock options to an employee of the Company to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share.  The options vest in three annual installments, with the first portion immediately vested.  The options carry a life of five years.
On June 3, 2014, the Company issued stock options to an employee of the Company to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 per share.  The options vest over three years. The options carry a life of five years.

On August 1, 2014, the Company issued stock options to an officer of the Company to purchase 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.39 per share.  The options vest in three annual installments, with the first portion immediately vested.  The options carry a life of five years.

On August 1, 2014, the Company issued stock options to an officer of the Company to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.39 per share.  The options vest in three annual installments, with the first portion immediately vested.  The options carry a life of five years.

On July 9, 2014, the Company issued non-employee stock options to a third-party consultant purchase up to 30,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The options have a fair market value of $13,160, all of which was recognized as professional fees during the year ended December 31, 2014.

On December 10, 2014, the Company issued stock options to its employees under an incentive plan. The employees were granted options to purchase up to an aggregate of 900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share and carry a life of five years.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company granted a total of 1,410,000 stock options at prices ranging from $.05 -$.23 to various employees. The options vest over three years and carry a life of five years.
On July 28, 2015, the Company issued stock options to an officer of the Company to purchase 6,328,764 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.034 per share.  The options vest over three years, with the first third immediately vested.  The options carry a life of five years.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company granted a total of 5,336,238 additional stock options as a result of the modification of previously granted options and restricted stock unit awards.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 a total of 7,705,164 stock options were forfeited by various employees of the Company.

2020.

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:2020:

Summary of Stock Option Activity

  Number Of
Options
  

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price

 
       
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  240,117  $1.10 
Granted  -  $- 
Expired  (240,117) $1.10 
Cancelled  -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  -  $- 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2020  -  $           - 

F-22

  
Number
Of Shares
  
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
  
      
Outstanding at December 31, 2013  -  $0.00 
Granted  11,886,900  $0.29 
Exercised  -  $0.00 
Cancelled   -  $0.00 
Outstanding at December 31, 2014  11,886,900  $0.29 
Granted  7,738,764  $0.06 
Granted  as a result of modified awards  5,336,238  $0.06 
Exercised  -  $0.00 
Cancelled  (7,705,164) $0.29 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  17,256,738  $0.14 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2014  2,204,417  $0.58 
Options exercisable at December 31, 2015  8,150,896  $0.19 

NaN stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2021.

The following tables summarize information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 20152021 and 2014:


  OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2015
 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Options
Outstanding 
  
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
  
Number Exercisable
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
$ 0.035 – 1.00 17,256,738 4.47 $ 0.14 8,150,896 $ 0.19
  17,256,738 4.47 $ 0.14 8,150,896 $ 0.19
  OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2014
 
Range of
Exercise Prices
 
Number of
Options
Outstanding 
  
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
  
Number Exercisable
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
 
$ 0.035 - 0.71 11,886,900 2.39 $ 0.29 2,204,417 $ 0.58 
  11,886,900 2.39 $ 0.29 2,204,417 $ 0.58 

Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable Exercise Price Range

OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2020
Range of
Exercise Prices
Number of
Options
Outstanding
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
Number
Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
$---$--$-

Total stock-based compensation expense in connection with options and modified awards recognized in the consolidated statement of operations for the years ended December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 was $19,771and $1,172,676,$0 and $0 respectively.


Note 12 – Income taxes

For

Warrants

The following is a summary of the yearsCompany’s warrant activity for the year ended December 31, 20152021:

Summary of Warrants Activity

  Number Of
Warrants
  

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price

 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  100,000  $1.00 
Granted  -  $- 
Expired  (100,000) $1.00 
Cancelled  -  $- 
Outstanding at December 31, 2021  -  $1.00 
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2020  100,000  $1.00 
Warrants exercisable at December 31, 2021  -  $- 

The following tables summarize information about warrants outstanding and 2014,exercisable at December 31, 2020:

Schedule of Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable Exercise Price Range

WARRANTS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2020 
Range of
Exercise
Prices
  

Number of

Warrants

Outstanding

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual Life

in Years

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

  

Number

Exercisable

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise Price

 
$1.00   100,000   .52  $1.00   100,000  $1.00 

F-23

Note 11 – Income taxes

On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”) that significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). The TCJA, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including reduction of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, effective as of January 1, 2018; limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense; limitation of the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of current year taxable income and elimination of net operating loss carry backs, in each case, for losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 (though any such tax losses may be carried forward indefinitely); modifying or repealing many business deductions and credits, including reducing the business tax credit for certain clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions generally referred to as “orphan drugs”; and repeal of the federal Alternative Minimum Tax (“AMT”).

The staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 to address the application of GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA. In connection with the initial analysis of the impact of the TCJA, the Company incurredremeasured its deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21%. The remeasurement of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities was offset by a change in the valuation allowance.

For the year ended December 31, 2021 the company had an operating profit but had a net operating lossesloss as of December 31, 2020 that exceeded the profit and accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 20152021 and 2014,2020, the Company had approximately $3,224,320 $7,144,066 and $2,528,422 $7,817,366 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2027.2029. The provision for income taxes consisted of the following components for the years ended December 31:


Components of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at December 31:

  December 31 
  2015  2014 
       
Deferred tax assets:      
Net operating loss carry forwards $1,128,512  $884,948 
Valuation allowance  (1,128,512)  (884,948)
Total deferred tax assets $-  $- 

Schedule of Components of Deferred Tax Assets

  2020  2019 
  December 31 
  2021  2020 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carry forwards $1,500,524  $1,641,647 
Valuation allowance $(1,500,524)  (1,641,647)
Total deferred tax assets $-  $- 

FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if, based on the weight of the evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has determined that a full valuation allowance of $1,500,524 and $1,641,647 against its net deferred taxes is necessary as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The change in valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 is $(141,393) and $15,096 respectively.

At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, the Company had $7,144,066 and $7,817,366, respectively, of U.S. net operating loss carryforwards remaining.

As a result of certain ownership changes, the Company may be subject to an annual limitation on the utilization of its U.S. net operating loss carryforwards pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. A study to determine the effect, if any, of this change, has not been undertaken.

Tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017 are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

A reconciliation of the Company’s income taxes to amounts calculated at the federal statutory rate is as follows for the years ended December 31:

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation

  2021  2020 
       
Federal statutory taxes  (21.00)%  (21.00)%
Change in tax rate estimate      
Change in valuation allowance  21.00%  21.00%
   %  %

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 20152021 and 20142020 was $1,128,512 $1,500,524 and $884,948, $1,641,647respectively. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 20152021 and 201420 and recorded a full valuation allowance.

Reconciliation between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate is as follows at December 31:

       
  2021  2020 
Federal statutory tax Reconciliation rate  (21.0)%  (21.0)%
Permanent difference and other  21.0%  21.0%

Note 12 – Subsequent events

The Company has evaluated all other subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined there are no additional events required to be disclosed.

2015 & 2014    
Federal statutory tax rate (35.0) %
Permanent difference and other 35.0%F-24

Note 13 – Subsequent Events
In January 2016 the Company borrowed $58,000 from an unrelated third party.
The loan has a maturity date of November 1, 2016 and bears interest at the rate of 8% per year.  If the loan is not paid when due, any unpaid loan amount will bear interest at 22% per year.  The Lender is entitled, at its option, at any time after July 26, 2016 to convert all or any part of the outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share equal to 58% of the average of the three lowest trading prices for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the conversion date.

The Company may prepay this note according to the following schedule:
Payment date   
on or before 
Payment Amount
 
    
May 27, 2016 $69,600 
June 26, 2016 $75,400 
July 26, 2016 $78,300 

After July 26, 2016, the Company may not prepay the note.

On April 1, 2016 the Company borrowed $144,000 from an unrelated third party.  The loan bears interest at a rate of 24.25% per year and is due and payable on April 1, 2017.
On April 14, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated third party to provide the Company with investor relations services.  Upon signing the agreement, the Company paid the investor relations consultant $75,000 and issued the consultant 1,500,000 shares of its restricted common stock.  The agreement requires the Company to pay the consultant an additional $75,000 prior to June 14, 2016.
On April 18, 2016 and May 1, 2016, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer collectively loaned the Company $40,000.  The loan is unsecured, due on demand and does not bear interest.

SIGNATURES


In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

BLUE LINE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.
(Registrant)
April 18, 2022By:/s/ Evan DeVoe
May 5 , 2016
By:/s/ Daniel Allen
Daniel Allen, ChiefEvan DeVoe, Principal Executive Officer

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Annual Report was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated:


SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Daniel AllenEvan DeVoeChiefPrincipal Executive, Financial andApril 18, 2022
Evan DeVoeAccounting Officer and a DirectorMay 5 , 2016
Daniel Allen
DirectorApril 18, 2022
Christopher Galvin
/s/ Daniel AllenDirectorApril 18, 2022
Daniel Allen
/s/ Doyle KnudsonDirectorApril 18, 2022
Doyle Knudson

20

/s/ Scott JacksonDirectorMay 5 , 2016
Scott Jackson

Director
Doyle Knudson











44