UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 20042005

Commission file number 1-11749

Lennar Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

700 Northwest 107th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33172

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (305) 559-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  YES  þ  NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  YES  ¨  NO  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  þ  NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, (as definedor a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES  þ    NO  ¨Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YesYES  ¨   NoNO  þ

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A and Class B common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (121,320,336(118,606,859 Class A shares and 11,122,34111,248,552 Class B shares) as of May 31, 2004,2005, based on the closing sale price per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was $6,044,862,064.$7,484,881,075.

As of January 31, 2005,2006, the registrant had outstanding 122,475,545125,989,769 shares of Class A common stock and 32,674,96232,823,187 shares of Class B common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Explanatory ParagraphPART I

This Form 10-K/A is being filedItem 1.    Business.

Overview of Lennar Corporation

We are one of the nation’s largest homebuilders and a provider of financial services. Our homebuilding operations include the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached homes, as well as the purchase, development and sale of residential land directly and through unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. Our financial services operations provide mortgage financing, title insurance, closing services and insurance agency services for both buyers of our homes and others. We sell substantially all of the purposeloans that we originate in the secondary mortgage market. Through our financial services operations, we also provide high-speed Internet and cable television services to residents of restatingcommunities we develop and to others. For financial information about both our homebuilding and financial services operating segments, you should review our consolidated financial statements and the notes to our consolidated financial statements, which are included in Item 8 of cash flows forthis document.

A Brief History of Our Growth

1

Homebuilding Operations

Overview

We primarily sell single-family attached and detached homes, and to a lesser extent, condominiums, in communities targeted to first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. The average sales price of a Lennar home was $311,000 in fiscal 2005. We operate primarily under the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003Lennar and 2002 to reclassify $128.5 million, $137.7 millionU.S. Home brand names, which incorporate our Everything’s Included^® and $77.9 million, respectively, from “cash flows from investing activities” to “cash flows from operating activities” as such amounts relate to distributions of earnings received fromDesign Studio^SM programs.

Through our own efforts and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments, we are involved in all phases of planning and building in our residential communities including land acquisition, site planning, preparation and improvement of land and design, construction and marketing of homes. We view unconsolidated entities as a means to both expand our market opportunities and manage our risks. For additional information about our unconsolidated entities, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7.

Management and Operating Structure

We balance a local operating structure with centralized corporate level management. Our local managers, who generally have significant experience in the homebuilding industry and, in most instances, in their particular markets, are responsible for operating decisions regarding land identification, joint ventures, community development, home design, construction and marketing. Decisions related to our overall strategy, acquisitions of land and businesses, risk management, financing, cash management and information systems are centralized at the corporate level.

Diversified Program of Property Acquisition

In our homebuilding operations, we generally acquire land for development and for the construction of homes that we sell to homebuyers. Land is subject to strict underwriting criteria and is acquired through our diversified program of property acquisition consisting of the following:

2

The table below indicates the number of homesites owned and homesites to which we had access through option contracts with third parties (“optioned”) or unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have investments (“JVs”) (i.e., controlled homesites) for each of our market regions at November 30, 2005 and 2004:

At November 30, 2005, our market regions consisted of homebuilding divisions located in the following states:East: Florida, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and South Carolina.Central: Texas, Illinois and Minnesota.West: California, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada.

Construction and Development

We generally supervise and control the development of land and the design and building of our residential communities. We hire subcontractors for site improvements and virtually all of the work involved in the construction of homes. Generally, arrangements with our subcontractors provide that our subcontractors will complete specified work in accordance with price schedules and applicable building codes and laws. The price schedules may be subject to change to meet changes in labor and material costs or for other reasons. We believe that the sources and availability of raw materials to our subcontractors are adequate for our current and planned levels of operation. We generally do not own heavy construction equipment, and we have a relatively small labor force used to supervise land development and construction of homes and perform routine maintenance and minor amounts of other work. We finance construction and land development activities primarily with cash generated from operations and public debt issuances, as well as cash borrowed under our revolving credit facility.

Marketing

We offer a diversified line of homes for first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. With homes priced from under $100,000 to above $1,000,000 and available in a variety of environments ranging from urban infill communities to golf course communities, we are focused on providing homes for a wide spectrum of buyers. Our Everything’s Included^® and Design Studio^SM programs provide customers with the flexibility to choose how they would like to purchase their new home. In our Everything’s Included^® program, we make the homebuying experience simple by including desirable, top-of-the-line features as standard items. In our Design Studio^SM program, we provide an individualized homebuying experience and personalized design consultation in our design studios, offering market targeted upgrades and options for a new home. We sell our homes primarily from models that we have designed and constructed.

We employ sales associates who are paid salaries, commissions or both to complete on-site sales of homes. We also sell homes through independent brokers. We advertise our communities in newspapers and other local and regional publications, on billboards and through our website, www.lennar.com. Our website allows homebuyers to search for homes with specific design criteria in their price range and desired location. In addition, we advertise our active adult communities in areas where prospective active adult homebuyers live.

We have participated in charitable down-payment assistance programs for a small percentage of our homebuyers. Through these programs, we make a donation to a non-profit organization that provides financial assistance to a homebuyer, who would not otherwise have sufficient funds for a down payment.

Quality Service

We strive to continually improve customer satisfaction for each homeowner throughout the pre-sale, sale, construction, closing and post-closing periods. Through the participation of sales associates, on-site construction

3

supervisors and customer care associates, all working in a team effort, we strive to create a quality homebuilding experience for our customers, which we believe leads to enhanced customer retention and referrals.

The quality of our homes is substantially affected by the efforts of on-site management and others engaged in the construction process, by the materials we use in particular homes or by other similar factors. Currently, most management team members’ bonus plans are, in part, contingent upon achieving certain customer satisfaction standards.

We have a “Heightened Awareness” program, which is a focused initiative designed to objectively evaluate and measure the quality of construction in our communities. The purpose of this program is to ensure that the homes delivered to our customers meet our high standards of quality and value. Our communities are inspected and reviewed on a periodic basis by our trained associates. This program is an example of our commitment to provide quality homes to our customers. In addition to our “Heightened Awareness” program, we have a quality assurance program in certain markets where we employ third-party consultants to inspect our homes during the construction process. These inspectors provide us with documentation of all inspection reports and follow-up verification. We also obtain independent surveys of selected customers through a third-party consultant and use the survey results to further improve our standard of quality and customer satisfaction.

We warrant our new homes against defective material and workmanship for a minimum period of one year after the date of closing. Although we subcontract virtually all segments of construction to others and our contracts call for the subcontractors to repair or replace any deficient items related to their trade, we are primarily responsible to correct any deficiencies.

Deliveries

The table below indicates the number of deliveries for each of our market regions during our last three fiscal years:

Of the total home deliveries listed above, 1,477, 1,015 and 768, respectively, represent deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Backlog

Backlog represents the number of homes under sales contracts. Substantially all of the homes currently in backlog are expected to be delivered during fiscal 2006. Homes are sold using sales contracts, which are generally accompanied by sales deposits. In some instances, purchasers are permitted to cancel sales contracts if they are unable to close on the sale of their existing home, fail to qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. We experienced a cancellation rate of 17% in 2005, compared to 16% and 20%, respectively, in 2004 and 2003. Although cancellations can delay the sales of our homes, they have not had a material impact on sales, operations or liquidity because we closely monitor our prospective buyers’ ability to obtain financing and use that information to adjust construction start plans to match anticipated deliveries of homes. We do not recognize revenue on homes under sales contracts until the sales are closed and title passes to the new homeowners, except for our mid-to-high-rise condominiums under construction for which revenue is recognized under percentage-of-completion accounting.

The table below indicates the backlog dollar value for each of our market regions as of the end of our last three fiscal years:

Of the dollar value of homes in backlog listed above, $590,129, $644,839 and $367,855, respectively, represent the backlog dollar value from unconsolidated entities at November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the backlog dollar value was $6.7 billion and $5.1 billion, respectively, of which $0.5 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, represent the backlog dollar value from unconsolidated entities.

4

Financial Services Operations

Mortgage Financing

We provide a full spectrum of conventional, FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed, first and second lien residential mortgage loan products to our homebuyers and others through our financial services subsidiaries, Universal American Mortgage Company, LLC and Eagle Home Mortgage, Inc., located in the same states as our homebuilding divisions, as well as other states. In 2005, our financial services subsidiaries provided loans to approximately 66% of our homebuyers who obtained mortgage financing in areas where we offered services. Because of the availability of mortgage loans from our financial services subsidiaries, as well as independent mortgage lenders, we believe access to financing has not been, and is not, a significant obstacle for most purchasers of our homes.

During 2005, we originated approximately 42,300 mortgage loans totaling $9.5 billion. Substantially all of the loans we originate are sold in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis; however, we remain liable for customary representations and warranties related to loan sales.

We have a corporate risk management policy under which we hedge our interest rate risk on rate-locked loan commitments and loans held-for-sale to mitigate exposure to interest rate fluctuations. We finance our mortgage loan activities with borrowings under our financial services subsidiaries’ warehouse lines of credit or from our general corporate funds.

Title Insurance, Closing Services and Insurance Agency Services

We provide title insurance and title and closing services to our homebuyers and others. We provided title and closing services for approximately 187,700 real estate transactions and issued approximately 193,900 title insurance policies during 2005 through subsidiaries of North American Title Group, Inc. Title and closing services are provided by agency subsidiaries in Arizona, California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. Title insurance underwriting is provided by North American Title Insurance Corporation in the District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Texas and Virginia and North American Title Insurance Company in Arizona, California, Colorado and Nevada.

We provide our homebuyers and others with personal lines, property and casualty insurance products through our insurance agency subsidiary, Universal American Insurance Agency, Inc., which operates in the same states as our homebuilding divisions, as well as other states. During 2005, we issued, as agent, approximately 14,200 new homeowner policies and renewed approximately 18,500 homeowner policies.

Communication Services

Lennar Communications Ventures oversees our interests and activities in relationships with providers of advanced communication services, and through its subsidiaries provides cable television and high-speed Internet services to residents of our communities and others. At December 31, 2005, we had approximately 12,400 subscribers across Texas, California and Florida.

Seasonality

We have historically experienced variability in our results of operations from quarter-to-quarter due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding business. We typically experience the highest rate of orders for new homes in the first half of the calendar year, although the rate of orders for our new homes is highly dependent on the number of active communities and the timing of new community openings. We typically have a greater percentage of new home deliveries in the second half of our fiscal year compared to the first half because new home deliveries trail orders for new homes by several months. As a result, our revenues and operating earnings from sales of homes are generally higher in the second half of our fiscal year.

Competition

The residential homebuilding industry is highly competitive. We compete for homebuyers in each of the market regions where we operate with numerous national, regional and local homebuilders, as well as with resales of existing homes and with the rental housing market. We compete for homebuyers on the basis of a number of interrelated factors including location, price, reputation, amenities, design, quality and financing. In addition to competition for homebuyers, we also compete with other homebuilders for desirable properties, raw materials and reliable, skilled labor. We compete for land buyers with third parties in our efforts to sell land to

5

homebuilders and others. We believe we are competitive in the market regions where we operate primarily due to our:

Our financial services operations compete with other mortgage lenders, including national, regional and local mortgage bankers and brokers, savings and loan associations and other financial institutions, in the origination and sale of mortgage loans. Principal competitive factors include interest rates and other features of mortgage loan products available to the consumer. We compete with other insurance agencies, including national, regional and local insurance agencies, in the sale of homeowner insurance and related insurance services. Principal competitive factors include cost and other features of insurance products available to the consumer. We compete with other escrow companies and other title insurance agencies for closing services and title insurance. Principal competitive factors include service and price. We compete with other communication service providers in the sale of high-speed Internet and cable television services. Principal competitive factors include price, quality, service and availability.

Regulation

Homes and residential communities that we build must comply with state and local laws and regulations relating to, among other things, zoning, construction permits or entitlements, construction material requirements, density requirements, building design and property elevation, building codes and handling of waste. These include laws requiring the use of construction materials that reduce the need for energy-consuming heating and cooling systems. These laws and regulations are subject to frequent change and often increase construction costs. In some instances, we must comply with laws that require commitments from us to provide roads and other offsite infrastructure to be in place prior to the commencement of new construction. These laws and regulations are usually administered by counties and municipalities and may result in fees and assessments or building moratoriums. In addition, certain new development projects are subject to assessments for schools, parks, streets and highways and other public improvements, the costs of which can be substantial.

The residential homebuilding industry is also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. These environmental laws include such areas as storm water and surface water management, soil, groundwater and wetlands protection, subsurface conditions and air quality protection and enhancement. Environmental laws and existing conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs and may prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas.

In recent years, several cities and counties in which we have developments have submitted to voters “slow growth” initiatives and other ballot measures that could impact the affordability and availability of land suitable for residential development within those localities. Although many of these initiatives have been defeated, we believe that if similar initiatives were approved, residential construction by us and others within certain cities or counties could be seriously impacted.

In order to make it possible for some of our homebuyers to obtain FHA-insured or VA-guaranteed mortgages, we must construct those homes in compliance with regulations promulgated by those agencies.

Various states have statutory disclosure requirements relating to the marketing and sale of new homes. These disclosure requirements vary widely from state-to-state. In addition, some states require that each new home be registered with the state at or before the time title is transferred to buyers (e.g., the Texas Residential Construction Commission Act).

In some states, we are required to be registered as a licensed contractor and comply with applicable rules and regulations. In various states our new home consultants are required to be registered as licensed real estate agents and adhere to the laws governing the practices of real estate agents.

6

Our personal lines insurance and title subsidiaries must comply with applicable insurance laws and regulations. Our mortgage financing subsidiaries and title agencies must comply with applicable real estate lending laws and regulations.

Our mortgage banking and insurance subsidiaries are licensed in the states in which they do business and must comply with laws and regulations in those states regarding mortgage banking and applicable types of insurance companies. These laws and regulations include provisions regarding capitalization, operating procedures, investments, lending and privacy disclosures, forms of policies and premiums.

Our cable subsidiary is generally required to both secure a franchise agreement with each locality in which it operates and to satisfy requirements of the Federal Communications Commission in the ordinary conduct of its business.

A subsidiary of The Newhall Land and Farming Company, of which we indirectly own 50%, provides water to a portion of Los Angeles County, California. This subsidiary is subject to extensive regulation by the California Public Utilities Commission.

Employees

At December 31, 2005, we employed 13,687 individuals of whom 9,765 were involved in our homebuilding operations and 3,922 were involved in our financial services operations. We believe our relations with our employees are good. We do not have collective bargaining agreements relating to any of our employees. We subcontract many phases of our homebuilding operations and some of the subcontractors we use have employees who are represented by labor unions.

Relationship with LNR Property Corporation

In 1997, we transferred our commercial real estate investment and management business to LNR Property Corporation (“LNR”), and spun-off LNR to our stockholders. As a result, LNR became a publicly-traded company, and the family of Stuart A. Miller, our President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director, which had voting control of us, became the controlling shareholder of LNR.

At the time of the spin-off, we entered into an agreement which, among other things, prevented us, in some circumstances, from engaging through December 2002 in any of the businesses in which LNR was engaged, or anticipated becoming engaged, at the time of the spin-off, and prohibited LNR from engaging, at least through December 2002, in any of the businesses in which we were engaged, or anticipated becoming engaged, at the time of the spin-off (except in limited instances in which our then activities or anticipated activities overlapped with LNR). This agreement was extended through November 30, 2005 and expired on that date.

Since the spin-off, we have entered into a number of joint ventures and other transactions with LNR. Many of the joint ventures were formed to acquire and develop land, part of which was subsequently sold to us or other homebuilders for residential building and part of which was subsequently sold to LNR for commercial development. Because LNR was controlled by Mr. Miller and his family, all significant transactions we or our subsidiaries engaged in with LNR or entities in which it had an interest were reviewed and approved by the Independent Directors Committee of our Board of Directors.

In January 2004, a company of which we and LNR each own 50% acquired The Newhall Land and Farming Company (“Newhall”) for approximately $1 billion. The purchase price was paid with (1) approximately $200 million we contributed to the jointly-owned company, (2) approximately $200 million LNR contributed to the jointly-owned company, (3) a $400 million term loan borrowed under $600 million of bank financing obtained by the jointly-owned company and another company of which we and LNR each owned 50% and (4) approximately $217 million from the proceeds of a sale by Newhall of income-producing properties to LNR. Newhall owns approximately 48,000 acres in California, including approximately 34,000 acres in north Los Angeles County that includes two master-planned communities. In connection with the acquisition, we agreed to purchase 687 homesites and received options to purchase an additional 623 homesites from Newhall.

On November 30, 2004, we and LNR each transferred our interests in most of our joint ventures to the jointly-owned company that had acquired Newhall, and that company was renamed LandSource Communities Development LLC.

7

In February 2005, LNR was acquired by a privately-owned entity. Although Mr. Miller’s family acquired a 20.4% interest in that privately-owned entity, neither Mr. Miller nor anybody else in his family is an officer or director, or otherwise is involved in the management of LNR or its parent. Nonetheless, because the Miller family has a 20.4% interest in LNR’s parent, significant transactions with LNR or entities in which it has an interest are still reviewed and approved by the Independent Directors Committee of our Board of Directors.

NYSE Certifications

We submitted our 2004 Annual CEO Certification to the New York Stock Exchange on April 21, 2005. The certification was not qualified in any respect. Additionally, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as exhibits to our Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A for the year ended November 30, 2004, the CEO and CFO certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Available Information

Our corporate website is www.lennar.com. We make available on our website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file these documents with, or furnish them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information on our website is not part of this document.

Our website also includes our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors. Each of these documents is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy by addressing a request to:

Lennar Corporation

Attention: Office of the General Counsel

700 Northwest 107^th Avenue

Miami, Florida 33172

Item 1A.    Risk Factors.

Risk Factors Relating to Our Business

If any of the following risks develop into actual events, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects could be materially adversely affected:

Downward changes in economic conditions generally or in the market regions where we operate could decrease demand and pricing for new homes in these areas.

The residential homebuilding industry is sensitive to changes in economic conditions such as the level of employment, consumer confidence, consumer income, availability of financing and interest rate levels. Adverse changes in any of these conditions generally, or in the market regions where we operate, could decrease demand and pricing for new homes in these areas or result in customer cancellations of pending contracts, which could adversely affect the number of home deliveries we make or reduce the prices we can charge for homes, either of which could result in a decrease in our revenues and earnings.

The homebuilding industry has not experienced an economic down cycle in a number of years, which may have resulted in an overvaluation of land and new homes.

Although the homebuilding business historically has been cyclical, it has not undergone an economic down cycle in a number of years. Further, during 2005, land and home prices rose significantly in many of our markets. This has led some people to assert that the prices of land, new homes and the stock prices of homebuilding companies may be inflated and may decline if the demand for land and new homes weakens. A decline in the prices for land and new homes could adversely affect both our revenues and margins. A decline in our stock price could make raising capital through stock issuances more difficult and expensive.

Federal laws and regulations that adversely affect liquidity in the secondary mortgage market could hurt our business.

Recent federal laws and regulations could have the effect of curtailing the activities of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). These

8

organizations provide significant liquidity to the secondary mortgage market. Any curtailment of their activities could increase mortgage interest rates and increase the effective cost of our homes, which could reduce demand for our homes and adversely affect our results of operations.

The federal financial institution agencies recently issued proposed Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Products (“Guidance”). If adopted, the Guidance will apply to credit unions, to banks and savings associations and their subsidiaries, and to bank and savings association holding companies and their subsidiaries. Although the Guidance will not apply to independent mortgage companies, it likely will affect the origination operations of many mortgage companies that broker or sell nontraditional mortgage loan products to such entities. If the Guidance is adopted, it could reduce the number of potential customers who could qualify for loans to purchase homes from us and others.

Customers may be unwilling or unable to purchase our homes at times when mortgage-financing costs are high or as credit quality declines.

The majority of our homebuyers finance their purchases through our financial services operations or third-party lenders. In general, housing demand is adversely affected by increases in interest rates and by decreases in the availability of mortgage financing as a result of declining customer credit quality or other issues. If mortgage interest rates increase and the ability or willingness of prospective buyers to finance home purchases is adversely affected, our operating results may be adversely affected.

Competition for homebuyers could reduce our deliveries or decrease our profitability.

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for skilled labor, materials and suitable land, as well as homebuyers. We compete in each of our markets with numerous national, regional and local homebuilders. This competition with other homebuilders could reduce the number of homes we deliver, or cause us to accept reduced margins in order to maintain sales volume.

We also compete with resales of existing used or foreclosed homes, housing speculators and available rental housing. Increased competitive conditions in the residential resale or rental market in the regions where we operate could decrease demand for new homes and increase cancellations of sales contracts in backlog.

Government entities in regions where we operate have adopted or may adopt, slow or no growth initiatives, which could adversely affect our ability to build or timely build in these areas.

Some municipalities where we operate have approved, and others where we operate may approve, various slow growth or no growth homebuilding initiatives and other ballot measures that could negatively impact the availability of land and building opportunities within those localities. Approval of slow growth, no growth or similar initiatives (including the effect of these initiatives on existing entitlements and zoning) could adversely affect our ability to build or timely build and sell homes in the affected markets and or create additional administrative and regulatory requirements and costs, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our future revenues and earnings.

Natural disasters and severe weather conditions could delay deliveries, increase costs and decrease demand for new homes in affected areas.

Our homebuilding operations are located in many areas that are accountedsubject to natural disasters and severe weather. The occurrence of natural disasters or severe weather conditions can delay new home deliveries, increase costs by damaging inventories and negatively impact the demand for new homes in affected areas. Furthermore, if our insurance does not fully cover business interruptions or losses resulting from these events, our earnings, liquidity or capital resources could be adversely affected.

Supply shortages and other risks related to the demand for skilled labor and building materials could increase costs and delay deliveries.

Increased costs or shortages of skilled labor and/or lumber, framing, concrete, steel and other building materials could cause increases in construction costs and construction delays. We generally are unable to pass on increases in construction costs to those customers who have already entered into sales contracts, as those sales contracts generally fix the price of the home at the time the contract is signed, which may be well in advance of the construction of the home. Sustained increases in construction costs may, over time, erode our margins, and pricing competition for materials and labor may restrict our ability to pass on any additional costs, thereby decreasing our margins.

9

We may not be able to acquire land suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices, which could increase our costs and reduce our revenues, earnings and margins.

Our long-term ability to build homes depends upon our acquiring land suitable for residential building at reasonable prices in locations where we want to build. Over the past few years, we have experienced an increase in competition for suitable land as a result of land constraints in many of our markets. As competition for suitable land increases, and as available land is developed, the cost of acquiring suitable remaining land could rise, and the availability of suitable land at acceptable prices may decline. Any land shortages or any decrease in the supply of suitable land at reasonable prices could limit our ability to develop new communities or result in increased land costs. We may not be able to pass through to our customers any increased land costs, which could adversely impact our revenues, earnings and margins.

Compliance with federal, state and local regulations related to our business could have substantial costs both in time and money, and some regulations could prohibit or restrict some homebuilding ventures.

We are subject to extensive and complex laws and regulations that affect the land development and homebuilding process, including laws and regulations related to zoning, permitted land uses, levels of density, building design, elevation of properties, water and waste disposal and use of open spaces. In addition, we are subject to laws and regulations related to workers’ health and safety. We also are subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. In some of the markets where we operate, we are required to pay environmental impact fees, use energy-saving construction materials and give commitments to municipalities to provide certain infrastructure such as roads and sewage systems. We generally are required to obtain permits, entitlements and approvals from local authorities to commence and complete residential development or home construction. Such permits, entitlements and approvals may, from time-to-time, be opposed or challenged by local governments, neighboring property owners or other interested parties, adding delays, costs and risks of non-approval to the process. Our obligation to comply with the laws and regulations under which we operate, and our obligation to ensure that our employees, subcontractors and other agents comply with these laws and regulations, could result in delays in construction and land development, cause us to incur substantial costs and prohibit or restrict land development and homebuilding activity in certain areas in which we operate.

Changing market conditions may adversely affect our ability to sell our land and home inventories at expected prices, which could reduce our margins.

The lag time between when we acquire land for development and when we can bring communities to market can vary significantly. The market value of home inventories, undeveloped land and developed homesites can fluctuate significantly during this time period because of changing market conditions. Recently we have been able to sell homes at higher prices than we anticipated when we acquired the land on which they were built, which has helped us to achieve unusually high profit margins. However, in the future, we may need to sell homes or other property at prices that generate lower margins than we anticipate when we purchase land. We may also be required to record material write-downs to our land or home inventories if their market values decline.

Inflation may result in increased costs that we may not be able to recoup if demand declines.

Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing costs of land, materials and labor may require us to increase the sales price of homes in order to maintain satisfactory margins. However, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which can have a negative impact on housing demand, in which case we may not be able to raise home prices sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation and our margins could decrease.

Tax law changes could make home ownership more expensive or less attractive.

Significant expenses of owning a home, including mortgage interest expense and real estate taxes, generally are deductible expenses for an individual’s federal, and in some cases state, income taxes, subject to various limitations under current tax law and policy. If the federal government or a state government changes income tax laws, as has been discussed recently, to eliminate or substantially modify these income tax deductions, then the after-tax cost of owning a new home would increase substantially. This could adversely impact demand for, and/or sales prices of, new homes.

10

We may be unable to obtain suitable financing and bonding for the development of our communities.

Our business depends substantially on our ability to obtain financing for the development of our residential communities and to provide bonds to ensure the completion of our projects. If we are unable to finance the development of our communities through our credit facility or other debt, or if we are unable to provide required surety bonds for our projects, our business operations and revenues could be adversely affected.

We may be unable to renew or extend our significant outstanding debt instruments when they mature.

Our senior unsecured credit facility consists of a $1.7 billion revolving credit facility maturing in June 2010 and includes access to an additional $500 million via an accordion feature, under which the facility may be increased to $2.2 billion, subject to additional commitments. In January 2006, we increased the commitment under the credit facility to $2.2 billion via access of the accordion feature. Also, our Financial Services Division has warehouse lines of credit totaling $1.3 billion, with borrowings under these lines of credit totaling $1.2 billion at November 30, 2005. These warehouse lines of credit mature in 2006 and 2007. We cannot assure that we will be able to extend or renew these debt arrangements on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to renew or extend these debt arrangements, it could adversely affect our liquidity and capital resources.

We may not be able to identify or integrate suitable acquisition targets, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our growth strategy.

Our ability to execute our growth strategy depends in part on our ability to identify and purchase suitable acquisition candidates, as well as our ability to successfully integrate acquired operations into our business. The integration of operations of acquired companies with our operations, including the consolidation of systems, procedures, personnel and facilities, the relocation of staff, and the achievement of anticipated cost savings, economies of scale and other business efficiencies, presents significant challenges to our management, particularly if several acquisitions occur at the same time.

Additional factors may adversely impact our acquisition growth strategy. Our acquisition strategy may require spending significant amounts of capital. If we are unable to obtain sufficient debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, or at all, we may need to reduce the scope of our acquisition growth strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects. The competition from our competitors or others pursuing the same acquisition candidates may increase purchase prices of businesses and/or prevent us from acquiring certain acquisition candidates. If any of the aforementioned factors cause us to alter our growth strategy, our results of operations and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

We could be hurt by the loss of key management personnel.

Our future success depends, to a significant degree, on the efforts of our senior management. Our operations could be adversely affected if key members of senior management cease to be active in our company.

We have a stockholder who exercises significant influence over matters that are brought to a vote of our stockholders.

Stuart A. Miller, our President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director, has voting control, through personal holdings and family-owned entities, of Class A and Class B common stock that enables Mr. Miller to cast approximately 47% of the votes that may be cast by the holders of our outstanding Class A and Class B common stock combined. That gives significant influence to Mr. Miller in electing our directors and approving most matters that are presented to our stockholders. Mr. Miller’s voting power might discourage someone from acquiring us or from making a significant equity method. investment in us, even if we needed the investment to meet our obligations and to operate our business. Also, because of his voting power, Mr. Miller may be able to authorize actions in matters that are contrary to our other stockholders’ desired actions or interests.

Not applicable.

11

Executive Officers of Lennar Corporation

The restatement doesfollowing individuals are our executive officers as of February 7, 2006:

Mr. Strudler was the Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors and Chief Operating Officer from May 2000 through November 2004. Effective December 1, 2004, Mr. Strudler resigned as Chief Operating Officer and was elected as the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Prior to May 2000, Mr. Strudler was the Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Home Corporation.

Mr. Miller has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since 1997 and is one of our Directors. Before 1997, Mr. Miller held various executive positions with us.

Mr. Jaffe has been a Vice President since 1994 and has served as our Chief Operating Officer since December 1, 2004. Prior to that time, Mr. Jaffe served as a Regional President in our Homebuilding Division. Additionally, prior to his appointment as Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Jaffe was one of our Directors from 1997 through June 2004.

Mr. Gross has been a Vice President and our Chief Financial Officer since 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Gross was Senior Vice President, Controller and Treasurer of Pacific Greystone Corporation.

Mr. Ames has been a Vice President since 1982 and has been responsible for Investor Relations since 2000.

Ms. Bessette joined us in 1995, has been our Controller since 1997 and became a Vice President in 2000.

Mr. McCain joined us in 1998 as a Vice President and as our General Counsel and Secretary. In 2003, Mr. McCain was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Lennar Financial Services, LLC.

Mr. Sustana joined us in 2005 as our Secretary and General Counsel. Before joining Lennar, Mr. Sustana held various legal positions at GenTek, Inc., a manufacturer of communication products, industrial components and performance chemicals.

Item 2.    Properties.

We lease and maintain our executive offices in an office complex in Miami, Florida. Our homebuilding and financial services offices are located in the markets where we conduct business, primarily in leased space. We believe that our existing facilities are adequate for our current and planned levels of operation.

Because of the nature of our homebuilding operations, significant amounts of property are held as inventory in the ordinary course of our homebuilding business. We discuss these properties in the discussion of our homebuilding operations in Item 1 of this document.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings.

We are party to various claims and lawsuits which arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the specific allegations in the lawsuits differ, most of them involve claims that we failed to construct buildings in particular communities in accordance with plans and specifications or applicable construction codes and seek reimbursement for sums allegedly needed to remedy the alleged deficiencies, assert contract issues or relate to personal injuries. Lawsuits of these types are common within the homebuilding industry. We do not affectbelieve that the net changeultimate resolution of these claims or lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

12

PART II

Item 5.    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our Class A and Class B common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols “LEN” and “LEN.B,” respectively. The following table shows the high and low sales prices for our Class A and Class B common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by the NYSE, and cash dividends declared per share adjusted for our January 2004 two-for-one stock split:

As of January 31, 2006, the last reported sale price of our Class A common stock was $62.56 and the last reported sale price of our Class B common stock was $57.79. As of January 31, 2006, there were approximately 1,200 and 800 holders of record, respectively, of our Class A and Class B common stock.

On January 12, 2006, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.16 per share for both our Class A and Class B common stock, which is payable on February 17, 2006 to holders of record at the close of business on February 7, 2006. We regularly pay quarterly dividends as set forth in the table above. We currently expect that comparable cash dividends will continue to be paid in the future although we have no commitment to do that.

In June 2001, our Board of Directors authorized our stock repurchase program to permit future purchases of up to 20 million shares (adjusted for anythe January 2004 two-for-one stock split) of our outstanding common stock. During the three months ended November 30, 2005, we repurchased the following shares of our Class A common stock (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K is provided under Item 12 of this document.

13

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data.

The following table sets forth our selected financial and operating information as of or for each of the years ended November 30, 2004, 20032001 through 2005. The information presented below is based upon Lennar’s historical financial statements, except for the results of operations of a subsidiary of the Financial Services Division’s title company that was sold in May 2005 and 2002have been classified as discontinued operations. Share and has no impact on our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of earnings and related earnings per share amounts or consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity. Conforming changes have been maderetroactively adjusted to reflect the consolidating statementseffect of cash flows included in Note 17our April 2003 10% Class B common stock distribution and management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in this Form 10-K/A. See Note 19 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information relating to the restatement. This Form 10-K/A has not been updated for events or information subsequent to the date of filing of the original Form 10-K, except in connection with the foregoing.our January 2004 two-for-one stock split.

PART II

14

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data,” included in our original Form 10-K,Data” and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this document.

Restatement of Financial Statements

The discussion of cash flows in the Financial Condition and Capital Resources section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 reflects a restatement of $128.5 million, $137.7 million and $77.9 million in our consolidated statements of cash flows, respectively, to reclassify these amounts from “cash flows from investing activities” to “cash flows from operating activities” as they relate to distributions of earnings received from unconsolidated entities in which we have investments that are accounted for by the equity method. The restatement does not affect the net change in cash for any of the years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and has no impact on our consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of earnings and related earnings per share amounts or consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A,10-K, are “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, strategies and prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those described under the caption “Risk Factors Relating to Our Business” in Item 11A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.this document. We do not undertake any obligation or duty to update forward-looking statements to reflect either the occurrence or non-occurrence of any of the risk factors, or to reflect any other future event or circumstance.statements.

Outlook

OurFiscal 2005 proved to be a very strong year for Lennar and other large national homebuilders, as the pace of price appreciation on new homes drove record level profit margins in various markets. During fiscal 2005, we accumulated a record level backlog dollar value of sales contractsnew home orders, which at November 30, 20042005 was 30%36% higher than it was at November 30, 2003. This gives us good visibilitythe end of fiscal 2004. With communities in place to meet our delivery goals and a backlog of $6.7 billion as of December 31, 2005, we believe that we are well positioned for fiscal 2006.

As we enter fiscal 2005. In2006, there have been early indications of a slower sales pace in certain markets in which we operate. While these indicators point to the likelihood that price appreciation in these markets will not continue at the level experienced in fiscal 2005, we anticipate demandbelieve that in most of these markets, with interest rates reasonably low, employment trends remaining positive and inventory levels only moderately up, our focus on inventory management and excellent land positions should support another record year for our homes to remaincompany.

Our strong due to continued strength in the homebuilding market,balance sheet and ample liquidity position us well for opportunities, as we also anticipate growth in the volume offocus primarily on growing our mid-to-high-rise residential business. In addition,company organically. However, we remain a growth-focused company, and we expect to continue to employ a diversified growth strategy to enhance future opportunities for our company. This will entail increasing sales organically and by acquiringopportunistic towards the acquisition of small and possibly large homebuilders. We expect this combination of organic growth and strategic acquisitionsIn addition to result in, among other things, cost savings and growth of ancillary services.

While we may be negatively impacted by higher interest rates, higher building costs and shortages of certain building materials in the long-term, we believe we will be able to leverage our size to offset these market factors, and we will attempt to manage these challenges through process improvement and cost reduction. Also, ourmaintaining a strong balance sheet and cash position afford us the opportunity to continue to buildgrowing bottom-line profitability, we remain focused on an alreadyachieving strong market share position while we continue to look for opportunities to grow into new markets.returns on capital by managing our land portfolio and controlling additional homesites through options and strategic joint ventures.

Results of Operations

Overview

We achieved record revenues, profits and earnings per share from continuing operations in 2004.2005. Our net earnings from continuing operations in 20042005 were $945.6$1.3 billion, or $8.17 per share diluted ($8.65 per share basic), compared to $944.6 million, or $5.70 per share diluted ($6.09 per share basic), compared to $751.4 million, or $4.65 per share diluted ($5.106.08 per share basic), in 2003.2004. The increase in net earnings from continuing operations was attributable to strength in our Homebuilding Division’s operations. In particular, both our deliveries and average sales price on homes delivered increased due to strong demand resulting fromand supply constraints demographic trends,in strategic markets, low interest rates and improvingfavorable economic and demographic trends.

Earnings per share amounts for all years have been adjusted to reflect the effect of our April 2003 10% Class B common stock distribution and our January 2004 two-for-one stock split.

Homebuilding

Our Homebuilding Division sells and constructs homes primarily for first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. We use a dual marketing strategy in which we sell homes under both our Everything’s Included^® and Design Studio^SMprograms. Our land operations include the purchase, development and sale of land for our homebuilding activities, as well as the sale

15

of land to third parties. In certain circumstances, we diversify our operations through strategic alliances and minimize our risks by investing with third parties in unconsolidated entities with third parties.entities. The following tables set forth selected financial and operational information for the years indicated. The results of operations of the homebuilders we acquired during these years are included in the tables since the respective dates of the acquisitions.

Homebuilding Division’s Selected Financial and Operational Data

Summary of Home and Backlog Data By Region

At November 30, 2004,2005, our market regions consisted of homebuilding divisions located in the following states:East:Florida, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina and South Carolina.Central: Texas, Illinois and Minnesota.West: California, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada.

Of the total home deliveries listed above, 1,477, 1,015 768 and 568,768, respectively, represent deliveries from unconsolidated entities for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

Of the new orders listed above, 1,254, 1,700 1,553 and 733,1,553, respectively, represent new orders from unconsolidated entities for the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

16

Of the homes in backlog listed above, 1,359, 1,585 1,226 and 441,1,226, respectively, represent homes in backlog from unconsolidated entities at November 30, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

Of the dollar value of homes in backlog listed above, $590,129, $644,839 $367,855 and $132,401,$367,855, respectively, represent the backlog dollar value from unconsolidated entities at November 30, 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002.2003.

Backlog represents the number of homes subjectunder sales contracts. Substantially all of the homes currently in backlog are expected to pending sales contracts.be delivered in fiscal 2006. Homes are sold using sales contracts, which are generally accompanied by sales deposits. In some instances, purchasers are permitted to cancel sales contracts if they are unable to close on the sale of their existing home, fail to qualify for financing or under certain other circumstances. We experienced a cancellation rate of 17% in 2005, compared to 16% and 20% in 2004 compared to 20% and 21% in 2003, and 2002, respectively. Although cancellations can delay the sales of our homes, they have not had a material impact on sales, operations or liquidity because we closely monitor our prospective buyers’ ability to obtain financing and use that information to adjust construction start plans to match anticipated deliveries of homes. We do

not recognize revenue on homes covered by pendingunder sales contracts until the sales are closed and title passes to the new homeowners.homeowners, except for our mid-to-high-rise condominiums under construction for which revenue is recognized under percentage-of-completion accounting.

During 2005, we entered metropolitan New York City and the Boston and Reno, Nevada markets and we expanded our presence in our East and West regions through homebuilding acquisitions. During 2004, we expanded our presence through homebuilding acquisitions in all of our regions.regions through homebuilding acquisitions. During 2003, we expanded our operations in California and South Carolina through homebuilding acquisitions. The results of operations of the homebuilders we acquiredacquisitions are included in our results of operations since their respective acquisition dates.

2005 versus 2004

Revenues from home sales increased 33% in 2005 to $12.7 billion from $9.6 billion in 2004. Revenues were higher primarily due to a 16% increase in the number of home deliveries and a 15% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered in 2005. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, increased to 40,882 homes in the year ended November 30, 2005 from 35,189 homes last year. In 2005, new home deliveries were higher in each of our regions, compared to 2004. The average sales price of homes delivered increased to $311,000 in the year ended November 30, 2005 from $272,000 in 2004.

Gross margins on home sales were $3.3 billion, or 26.0%, in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $2.3 billion, or 23.9%, in 2004. Gross margin percentage on home sales increased 210 basis points primarily due to a product mix favoring our higher margin states, as well as a significant gross margin percentage improvement in Arizona, California and Florida.

Homebuilding interest expense (primarily included in cost of homes sold and cost of land sold) was $187.2 million in 2005, compared to $134.2 million in 2004. The increase in interest expense was due to higher interest costs resulting from higher debt, as well as increased deliveries during 2005, compared to 2004, due to the growth in our homebuilding operations. Our homebuilding debt to total capital ratio as of November 30, 2005 was 33.1%, compared to 33.3% as of November 30, 2004.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues from home sales were 10.8% in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to 10.9% in the year ended November 30, 2004.

Gross profit on land sales totaled $200.8 million in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $159.4 million in 2004. Some of these land sales were from consolidated joint ventures, which resulted in minority

17

interest expense. Minority interest expense, net from these land sales and other activities of the consolidated joint ventures was $45.0 million and $10.8 million, respectively, in the years ended November 30, 2005 and 2004. Management fees and other income, net, totaled $61.5 million in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $69.3 million in 2004. Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities was $133.8 million in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $90.7 million last year. Sales of land, minority interest expense, net, management fees and other income, net and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

At November 30, 2005, we owned approximately 102,700 homesites and had access to an additional 222,100 homesites through either option contracts or unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2005, 14% of the homesites we owned were subject to home purchase contracts. Our backlog of sales contracts was 18,565 homes ($6.9 billion) at November 30, 2005, compared to 15,546 homes ($5.1 billion) at November 30, 2004. The higher backlog was primarily attributable to our growth and strong demand for our homes, which resulted in higher new orders in 2005, compared to 2004. As a result of acquisitions combined with our organic growth, inventories, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased 54% during 2005, while revenues from sales of homes increased 33% for the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to prior year.

2004 versus 2003

Revenues from home sales increased 19% in 2004 to $9.6 billion from $8.0 billion in 2003. Revenues were higher primarily due to a 12% increase in the number of home deliveries and a 6% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered in 2004. New home deliveries, excluding unconsolidated entities, increased to 35,189 homes in the year ended November 30, 2004 from 31,412 homes last year.in 2003. In 2004, new home deliveries were higher in each of our regions, compared to 2003. The average sales price of homes delivered increased to $272,000 in the year ended November 30, 2004 from $256,000 in 2003.

Gross margins on home sales were $2.3 billion, or 23.9%, in 2004, compared to $1.9 billion, or 23.1%, in 2003. Margins were positively impacted by an improvement in our East and West regions. This improvement was primarily attributable to favorable pricing power,conditions, particularly in our land-constrained markets, as well as a change in product mix. This improvement was partially offset by warranty expense related to the resolution of a dispute.

Homebuilding interest expense (primarily included in cost of homes sold and cost of land sold) was $134.2 million in 2004, compared to $141.3 million in 2003. The decrease in interest expense was due to lower interest costs resulting from a lower debt leverage ratio while we continued to grow.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues from home sales were 10.9% in both 2004 and 2003.

Revenues and gross marginsGross profit on land sales totaled $440.8$159.4 million in the year ended November 30, 2004, compared to $73.3 million in 2003. Some of these land sales were from consolidated joint ventures, which resulted in minority interest expense. Minority interest expense, net from these land sales and other activities of the consolidated joint ventures was $10.8 million and $159.4$5.0 million, or 36.2%, respectively, in the years ended November 30, 2004 and 2003. Management fees and other income, net, totaled $69.3 million in 2004, compared to $308.2$26.8 million and $73.3 million, or 23.8%, respectively, in 2003. Margins were positively impacted by each of our regions, with a strong contribution from our East and West regions. Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities was $90.7 million in 2004, compared to $81.9 million last year.in 2003. This improvement resulted from an increase in homes delivered by our unconsolidated homebuilding joint ventures. ManagementSales of land, minority interest expense, net, management fees and other income, net totaled $58.5 million in 2004, compared to $21.9 million in 2003. Sales of land,and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities and management fees and other income, net, may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

At November 30, 2004, we owned approximately 88,00087,700 homesites and had access to an additional 168,000168,300 homesites through either option contracts or unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2004, 13% of the homesites we owned were subject to home purchase contracts. Our backlog of sales contracts was 15,546 homes ($5.1 billion) at November 30, 2004, compared to 13,905 homes ($3.9 billion) at November 30, 2003. The higher backlog was primarily attributable to our growth and strong demand for our homes, which resulted in higher new orders in 2004, compared to 2003. As a result of acquisitions combined with our organic growth, inventories, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased 35% during 2004, while revenues from sales of homes increased 19% for the year ended November 30, 2004, compared to prior year.

2003 versus 2002

Revenues from sales of homes increased 22% in 2003, compared to 2002, as a result of a 17% increase in the number of home deliveries and a 4% increase in the average sales price of homes delivered in 2003. New home deliveries were higher in most of our markets, primarily in California, Florida, Texas and Illinois. The average sales price of homes delivered increased in 2003 primarily due to an increase in the average sales price in most of our existing markets, combined with changes in our product and geographic mix.

Gross margins on home sales were $1.9 billion or 23.1%, in 2003, compared to $1.5 billion, or 22.2% in 2002. The increase in 2003 was due to a greater contribution from a strong California market, combined with lower interest costs due to a lower debt leverage ratio while we continued to grow.

Homebuilding interest expense (primarily included in cost of homes sold and cost of land sold) was $141.3 million in 2003, compared to $145.6 million in 2002. The decrease in interest expense was due to lower interest costs resulting from a lower debt leverage ratio while we continued to grow.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues from home sales increased to 10.9% in 2003, compared to 10.7% in 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to higher personnel-related expenses, compared to 2002.

Revenues and gross margins on land sales totaled $308.2 million and $73.3 million, or 23.8%, respectively, in 2003, compared to $169.6 million and $2.0 million, or 1.2%, respectively, in 2002. Margins in 2003 were positively impacted by each of our regions, with strong contributions from our East and West regions. Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities was $81.9 million in 2003, compared to $42.7 million in 2002. Management fees and other income, net, totaled $21.9 million in 2003, compared to $33.3 million in 2002. Sales of land, equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities and management fees and other income, net may vary significantly from period to period depending on the timing of land sales and other transactions entered into by us and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments.

At November 30, 2003, we owned approximately 74,000 homesites and had access to an additional 135,000 homesites through either option contracts or unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2003, 13% of the homesites we owned were subject to home purchase contracts. Our backlog of sales contracts was 13,905 homes ($3.9 billion) at November 30, 2003, compared to 12,108 homes ($3.2 billion) at November 30, 2002. The higher backlog was primarily attributable to our homebuilding acquisitions and growth in the number of active communities, which resulted in higher new orders in 2003, compared to 2002. As a result of these acquisitions combined with our organic growth, inventories, excluding consolidated inventory not owned, increased 11% during 2003, while revenues from sales of homes increased 22% for the year ended November 30, 2003, compared to 2002.

Financial Services

Our Financial Services Division provides mortgage financing, title insurance, title and closing services and insurance agency services for both buyers of our homes and others. The Division sells substantially all of the loans it

18

originates in the secondary mortgage market.market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis; however, we remain liable for customary representations and warranties related to loan sales. The Division also provides high-speed Internet and cable television services to residents of our communities and others. The following table sets forth selected financial and operational information relating to our Financial Services Division. The results of operations of companies we acquired during these years are included in the table since the respective dates of the acquisitions.

Financial Services Division’s Selected Financial and Operational Data

2005 versus 2004

Operating earnings from continuing operations for the Financial Services Division were $104.8 million in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to $110.7 million last year. The decrease was primarily due to reduced profitability from the Division’s mortgage operations as a result of a more competitive mortgage environment in 2005, as well as a $6.5 million pretax gain generated from monetizing a majority of the Division’s alarm monitoring contracts in 2004. This decrease was partially offset by improved profitability from the Division’s title operations in 2005. The Division’s mortgage capture rate (i.e., the percentage of our homebuyers, excluding cash settlements, who obtained mortgage financing from us in areas where we offered services) was 66% in the year ended November 30, 2005, compared to 71% 2004. The decrease in the capture rate was a result of a more competitive mortgage environment. During 2005, we sold North American Exchange Company (“NAEC”), a subsidiary of the Financial Services Division’s title company, which generated a $15.8 million pretax gain.

2004 versus 2003

Operating earnings from continuing operations from our Financial Services Division decreased to $112.3$110.7 million in 2004, compared to $154.5$153.7 million in 2003. The decrease in operating earnings from continuing operations in 2004 was primarily due to a more competitive mortgage environment and a slowdown in refinance activity, which resulted in reduced profitability from our mortgage and title operations. The decline in operating earnings from continuing operations was partially offset by a $6.5 million gain generated by monetizing the majority of our alarm monitoring contracts in 2004. The Division’s mortgage capture rate (i.e., the percentage of our homebuyers, excluding cash settlements, who obtained mortgage financing from us in areas where we offered services) was relatively consistent in the year ended November 30, 2004, compared to 2003. The decline in operating earnings was partially offset by a $6.5 million gain generated by monetizing the majority of our alarm monitoring contracts.

2003 versus 2002

Operating earnings from our Financial Services Division increased to $154.5 million in 2003, compared to $127.6 million in 2002. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to improved results from our mortgage and title operations, which benefited from low interest rates and a strong refinance and housing environment. The Division’s mortgage capture rate (i.e., the percentage of our homebuyers, excluding cash settlements, who obtained mortgage financing from us in areas where we offered services) decreased in the year ended November 30, 2003 due to the transitioning of the mortgage business related to the homebuilders we have acquired since the beginning of fiscal 2002, as well as a result of increased competitiveness in the mortgage market.

Corporate General and Administrative

Corporate general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 1.4% in the year ended November 30, 2005 and 1.3% in both the years ended November 30, 2004 and 2003 and 1.2% in 2002.2003.

Financial Condition and Capital Resources

At November 30, 2004,2005, we had cash related to our homebuilding and financial services operations of $1.4$1.1 billion, compared to $1.3$1.4 billion at the end of fiscal 2003.November 30, 2004. The increasedecrease in cash was primarily due to an increase in inventories, contributions to unconsolidated entities, repurchases of common stock and acquisitions partially offset by our net earnings, distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and proceeds from debt issuances partially offset by an increase in operating assets and contributions to unconsolidated entities as we position ourselves for future growth.

We finance our land acquisition and development activities, construction activities, financial services activities and general operating needs primarily with cash generated from our operations and public debt issuances, as well as cash borrowed under our revolving credit facilitiesfacility and warehouse lines of credit.

19

Operating Cash Flow Activities

During 20042005 and 2003,2004, cash flows provided by operating activities amounted to $401.3$323.0 million and $718.5$420.2 million, respectively. During 2005, cash flows provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net earnings, an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities and distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities partially offset by an increase in inventories due to an increase in construction in progress to support a significantly higher backlog and land purchases to facilitate future growth, an increase in receivables resulting primarily from land sales and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities.

During 2004, cash flows provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net earnings, distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities, a decrease in mortgagefinancial services loans held-for-sale and an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities offset in part by an increase in inventories to support a significantly higher backlog and an increase in receivables resulting primarily from land sales. In particular, inventories increased by $870.2 million during 2004 due to an increased number of home starts to support a significantly higher backlog combined with the accelerated takedown of homesites that had been under option.

During 2003, cash flows provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net earnings, distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities and a decrease in mortgage loans held-for-sale offset in part by an increase in inventories to support a significantly higher backlog and a higher number of active communities. In particular, inventories increased by $267.2 million during 2003 due to an increase in backlog and the expansion of operations in our market areas.

Investing Cash Flow Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $566.7 million$1.0 billion during 2004,2005, compared to $255.9$534.1 million in 2003.2004. In 2005, we used $416.0 million of cash for acquisitions, $919.8 million of cash was contributed to unconsolidated entities and we had an increase in financial services loans held-for-investment of $117.4 million. This usage of cash was partially offset by $466.8 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities. In 2004, we used $105.7 million of cash for acquisitions and $751.2 million of cash was contributed to unconsolidated entities. In particular, we contributed approximately $200 million to an unconsolidated entity to fund the entity’s purchase of Newhall. This usage of cash was partially offset by $330.6 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities. In 2003, we used $159.4 million of cash for acquisitions, contributed $235.7 million of cash to unconsolidated entities and used $18.8 million for net additions to operating properties and equipment. This usage of cash was partially offset by $170.1 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities.

During 2004,2005, we entered metropolitan New York City and the Boston and Reno, Nevada markets and we expanded our presence in our East and West regions through homebuilding acquisitions in all of our regions, expanded our mortgage operations in Oregon and Washington and expanded our title and closing business into Minnesota.acquisitions. The results of operations of the companies acquiredthese acquisitions are included in our results of operations since their respective acquisition dates. We are always looking at the possibility of acquiring homebuilders and other companies. However, at November 30, 2004,2005, we had no agreements or understandings regarding any significant transactions.

Financing Cash Flow Activities

Homebuilding debt to total capital is a financial measure commonly used in the homebuilding industry and is presented to assist in understanding the leverage of our homebuilding operations. By providing a measure of leverage of our homebuilding operations, management believes that this measure enables readers of our financial statements to better understand our financial position and performance. Homebuilding debt to total capital as of November 30, 20042005 and 20032004 is calculated as follows:

The increaseratio at November 30, 2005 was consistent with the ratio in the ratio primarily resulted from our use of cash and increased borrowings to fund inventory purchases and contributions to unconsolidated entities to support future growth.prior year. In addition to the use of capital in our homebuilding and financial services operations, we actively evaluate various other uses of capital, which fit into our homebuilding and financial services strategies and appear to meet our profitability and return on capital goals. This may include acquisitions of, or investments in, other entities, the payment of dividends or repurchases of our outstanding common stock or debt. These activities may be funded through any combination of our credit facilities, cash generated from operations, sales of assets or the issuance of public debt, common stock or preferred stock.

20

The following table summarizes our homebuilding senior notes and other debts payable:

Our average debt outstanding was $3.0 billion in 2005, compared to $2.0 billion in 2004, compared to $1.6 billion in 2003.2004. The average rates for interest incurred were 5.7% in 2005, compared to 6.4% in 2004,2004. Interest incurred for the year ended November 30, 2005 was $172.9 million, compared to 7.7%$137.9 million in 2003.2004. The majority of our short-term financing needs, including financings for land acquisition and development activities and general operating needs, are met with cash generated from operations and funds available under our new unsecured credit facility (the “New Facility”), which replaced our senior unsecured credit facilities (the “Credit Facilities”). In May 2004, we amended and restated our Credit Facilities to provide us with up to $1.2 in June 2005. The New Facility consists of a $1.7 billion of financing.revolving credit facility maturing in June 2010. The Credit FacilitiesNew Facility also includeincludes access to an additional $190$500 million via an accordion feature, under which the Credit FacilitiesNew Facility may be increased to $1.4$2.2 billion, subject to additional commitments. TheWe repaid the outstanding balance under the Credit Facilities including $115with borrowings under the New Facility. As of November 30, 2005, the commitment under the New Facility’s revolving credit facility was increased by $40 million committed in October 2004via access of the accordion feature, reducing the access to additional commitments under the accordion feature consistto $460 million as of a $927.9 million revolving credit facility maturing in May 2009 and a $397.6 million 364-day revolving credit facility maturing in MayNovember 30, 2005. Subsequent to November 30, 2004,2005, we received the remaining additional commitments of $70$460 million under the accordion feature. Priorfeature increasing the New Facility to the amendment, in March 2004, we repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the term loan B portion of the Credit Facilities. We may elect to convert borrowings under the 364-day revolving credit facility to a term loan, which would mature in May 2009.$2.2 billion. The Credit Facilities areNew Facility is guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of our subsidiaries other than finance company subsidiaries (which include mortgage and title insurance subsidiaries). Interest rates on outstanding borrowings are LIBOR-based, and thewith margins are set by a pricing grid with thresholds that adjustdetermined based on changes in our leverage ratio and the Credit Facilities’ credit ratings.ratings, or an alternate base rate. At November 30, 2004,2005, no amounts were outstanding under the Credit Facilities.

AtNew Facility. During the year ended November 30, 2004, we had letters of credit outstanding in2005, the amount of $787.4 million. The majority of these letters of credit is posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities or is posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts. Of our total letters of credit outstanding, $251.4 million were collateralized against certainaverage daily borrowings available under the Credit Facilities.Facilities and the New Facility were $685.4 million.

In September 2004, we entered intoWe have a structured letter of credit facility (the “LC Facility”) with a financial institution. The purpose of the LC Facility is to facilitate the issuance of up to $200 million of letters of credit on a senior unsecured basis. In connection with the transaction,LC Facility, the financial institution issued $200 million of theirits senior notes, which wereare linked to our performance on the LC Facility. If there is an event of default under the LC Facility, including our failure to reimburse a draw against an issued letter of credit, the financial institution would assign its claim against us, to the extent of the amount due and payable by us under the LC Facility, to its noteholders in lieu of payingtheir principal repayment on their performance linkedperformance-linked notes.

In June 2005, we entered into a letter of credit facility with a financial institution. The purpose of the letter of credit facility is to facilitate the issuance of up to $150 million of letters of credit on a senior unsecured basis through the facility’s expiration date of June 2008.

At November 30, 2004,2005, we had letters of credit outstanding in the amount of $196.4$1.2 billion, which includes $194.3 million outstanding under the LC Facility and $148.2 million outstanding under the letter of credit facility entered into in June 2005. The majority of these letters of credit are posted with regulatory bodies to guarantee our performance of certain development and construction activities or are posted in lieu of cash deposits on option contracts. Of our total letters of credit outstanding, $244.6 million were collateralized against certain borrowings available under the New Facility.

In April 2005, we sold $300 million of 5.60% senior notes due 2015 (the “Senior Notes”) at a price of 99.771%. Substitute registered notes were subsequently issued. Proceeds from the offering, after initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $297.5 million. We added the proceeds to our working capital to be used for general corporate purposes. Interest on the Senior Notes is due semi-annually. The Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. Substantially all of our subsidiaries other than finance company subsidiaries guaranteed the Senior Notes.

21

In May 2005, we redeemed all of our outstanding 9.95% senior notes due 2010 (the “Notes”). The redemption price was $337.7 million, or 104.975% of the principal amount of the Notes outstanding, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption date. The redemption of the Notes resulted in a $34.9 million pretax loss.

In July 2005, we sold an additional $200 million of Senior Notes at a price of 101.407%. The Senior Notes were the same issue as the Senior Notes we sold in April 2005. Proceeds from the offering, after initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $203.9 million. We added the proceeds to our working capital to be used for general corporate purposes. Interest on the Senior Notes is due semi-annually. The Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. Substantially all of our subsidiaries other than finance company subsidiaries guaranteed the Senior Notes. At November 30, 2005, the carrying value of the Senior Notes sold in April and July 2005 was $502.1 million.

In September 2005, we sold $300 million of 5.125% senior notes due 2010 (the “New Senior Notes”) at a price of 99.905% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $298.2 million. We added the proceeds to our working capital to be used for general corporate purposes. Interest on the New Senior Notes is due semi-annually. The New Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. Substantially all of our subsidiaries other than finance company subsidiaries guaranteed the New Senior Notes. We have agreed to exchange the New Senior Notes for registered notes. The registered notes will have substantially identical terms as the New Senior Notes, except that the registered notes will not include transfer restrictions that are applicable to the New Senior Notes. At November 30, 2005, the carrying value of the New Senior Notes was $299.7 million.

In March and April 2004, we issued a total of $300 million of senior floating-rate notes due 2009 (the “Initial“Floating Rate Notes”), in a registered offering, which are callable at par beginning in March 2006. Proceeds from the offerings, after underwriting discount and expenses, were $298.5 million. We used the proceeds to partially prepay the term loan B portion of the Credit Facilities and added the remainder to our working capital to be used for general corporate purposes. We repaid the remaining outstanding balance of the term loan B with cash from our working capital. Interest on the InitialFloating Rate Notes is three-month LIBOR plus 0.75% (3.16%(5.17% as of November 30, 2004)2005) and is payable quarterly, compared to the term loan B interest of three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The InitialFloating Rate Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. At November 30, 2004,2005, the carrying value of the InitialFloating Rate Notes was $300.0 million.

Substantially all of our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries, and subsidiaries formed or acquired after October 9, 2001,have guaranteed the Initial Notes. The guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% directly and indirectly owned by Lennar Corporation. The principal reason our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries and subsidiaries formed or acquired after October 9, 2001, guaranteed the Initial Notes is so holders of the Initial Notes will have rights at least as great with regard to our subsidiaries as any other holders of a material amount of our unsecured debt. Therefore, the guarantees of the Initial Notes will remain in effect while the guarantor subsidiaries guarantee a material amount of the debt of Lennar Corporation, as a separate entity, to others. At any time, however, when a guarantor subsidiary is no longer guaranteeing at least $75 million of Lennar Corporation’s debt other than the Initial Notes and other notes with similar termination provisions, either directly or by guaranteeing other subsidiaries’ obligations as guarantors of Lennar Corporation’s debt, guarantor subsidiaries guarantee of the Initial Notes will be suspended. Currently, the guarantor subsidiaries are guaranteeing Lennar Corporation’s principal revolving bank credit lines, $350 million principal amount of senior notes due 2013, $322 million principal amount of 9.95% senior notes due 2010, $282 million principal amount of 7 ⁵/8% senior notes due 2009, $250 million principal amount of 5.50% senior notes due

2014 and $200 million principal amount of senior floating-rate notes due 2007. However, the guarantor subsidiaries’ guarantees of the senior notes due 2013, the senior notes due 2014 and the senior floating-rate notes due 2007 also will be suspended with regard to any guarantor subsidiary while it is not guaranteeing at least $75 million of Lennar Corporation’s debt and the guarantor subsidiaries’ guarantees of the senior notes due 2010 will be suspended with regard to any guarantor subsidiary that no longer is guaranteeing any of Lennar Corporation’s debt. Therefore, if, while the Initial Notes are outstanding, the guarantor subsidiaries cease guaranteeing Lennar Corporation’s obligations under the principal revolving bank credit lines and are not guarantors of any new debt, the guarantor subsidiaries’ guarantees of the Initial Notes will be suspended until such time, if any, as they again are guaranteeing at least $75 million of Lennar Corporation’s debt other than the Initial Notes.

If the guarantor subsidiaries are guaranteeing revolving credit lines totaling at least $75 million, we will treat the guarantees of the Initial Notes as remaining in effect even during periods when Lennar Corporation’s borrowings under the revolving credit lines are less than $75 million. Because it is possible that our banks will permit some or all of the guarantor subsidiaries to stop guaranteeing the revolving credit lines, it is possible that, at some time or times in the future, the Initial Notes will no longer be guaranteed by the guarantor subsidiaries.

In the Supplemental Indenture relating to the Initial Notes, we agreed to file by March 31, 2004 a registration statement relating to the guarantees by subsidiaries formed or acquired after October 9, 2001, but we did not do so because of questions regarding what information was required in that registration statement. Instead of filing a registration statement relating solely to the additional guarantees, on June 29, 2004, we filed a registration statement relating to an offer to exchange fully guaranteed senior floating-rate notes due 2009, series B (the “New Notes”) for the Initial Notes. The New Notes would be substantially identical with the Initial Notes, except that the New Notes would be guaranteed by all of our wholly-owned subsidiaries (other than finance company subsidiaries), including subsidiaries formed or acquired by us after October 9, 2001. In December 2004, the registration statement became effective. In January 2005, we exchanged all of the Initial Notes for the NewFloating Rate Notes.

In August 2004, we sold $250 million of 5.50% senior notes due 2014 at a price of 98.842% in a private placement. Proceeds from the offering, after initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $245.5 million. We used the proceeds to repay borrowings under our Credit Facilities. Interest on the senior notes is due semi-annually. The senior notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. Substantially all of our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries, guaranteed the senior notes. At November 30, 2004,2005, the carrying value of the senior notes was $247.1$247.3 million.

In August 2004, we We also sold $200 million of senior floating-rate notes due 2007 in a private placement. The senior floating-rate notes are callable at par beginning in February 2006. Proceeds from the offering, after initial purchaser’s discount and expenses, were $199.3 million. We used the proceeds to repay borrowings under our Credit Facilities. Interest on the senior floating-rate notes is three-month LIBOR plus 0.50% (2.91%(4.92% as of November 30, 2004)2005) and is payable quarterly. The senior floating-rate notes are unsecured and unsubordinated. Substantially all of our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries, guaranteed the senior floating-rate notes. At November 30, 2004,2005, the carrying value of the senior floating-rate notes was $200.0 million.

Substantially all of our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries, have guaranteed all our Senior Notes and Floating Rate Notes (the “Guaranteed Notes”). The guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% directly and indirectly owned by Lennar Corporation. The principal reason our subsidiaries, other than finance company subsidiaries, guaranteed the Guaranteed Notes is so holders of the Guaranteed Notes will have rights at least as great with regard to our subsidiaries as any other holders of a material amount of our unsecured debt. Therefore, the guarantees of the Guaranteed Notes will remain in effect while the guarantor subsidiaries guarantee a material amount of the debt of Lennar Corporation, as a separate entity, to others. At any time, however, when a guarantor subsidiary is no longer guaranteeing at least $75 million of Lennar Corporation’s debt other than the Guaranteed Notes, either directly or by guaranteeing other subsidiaries’ obligations as guarantors of Lennar Corporation’s debt, guarantor subsidiaries guarantee of the Guaranteed Notes will be suspended. Currently, the only debt the guarantor subsidiaries are guaranteeing other than the Guaranteed Notes is Lennar Corporation’s principal revolving bank credit line. Therefore, if, the guarantor subsidiaries cease guaranteeing Lennar Corporation’s obligations under the principal revolving bank

22

credit line and are not guarantors of any new debt, the guarantor subsidiaries’ guarantees of the Guaranteed Notes will be suspended until such time, if any, as they again are guaranteeing at least $75 million of Lennar Corporation’s debt other than the Guaranteed Notes.

If the guarantor subsidiaries are guaranteeing the revolving credit line totaling at least $75 million, we will treat the guarantees of the Guaranteed Notes as remaining in effect even during periods when Lennar Corporation’s borrowings under the revolving credit line is less than $75 million. Because it is possible that our banks will permit some or all of the guarantor subsidiaries to stop guaranteeing the revolving credit line, it is possible that, at some time or times in the future, the Guaranteed Notes will no longer be guaranteed by the guarantor subsidiaries.

At November 30, 2004,2005, our Financial Services Division had warehouse lines of credit totaling $950 million, which included a $275 million temporary increase that expired in December 2004,$1.3 billion to fund our mortgage loan activities. Borrowings under the facilities were $872.8 million$1.2 billion at November 30, 20042005 and were collateralized by mortgage loans and receivables on loans sold but not yet funded by the investor with outstanding principal balances of $894.7 million.$1.3 billion. There are several interest rate pricingrate-pricing options, which fluctuate with market rates. The effective interest rate on the facilities at November 30, 20042005 was 2.9%5.1%. The warehouse lines of credit mature during 2005in August 2006 ($700 million) and in April 2007 ($600 million), at which time we expect the facilities to be renewed. At November 30, 2004,2005, we had advances under a conduit funding agreement with a major financial institution amounting to $5.2$10.7 million. Borrowings under this agreement are collateralized by mortgage loans and had an effective interest rate of 3.2%5.0% at November 30, 2004.2005. We also had a $20$25 million revolving line of credit with a bank that matures in July 2005,August 2006, at which time the Division expects the line of credit to be renewed. The line of credit is collateralized by certain assets of the Division and stock of certain title subsidiaries. Borrowings under the line of credit were $18.9$23.6 million and had an effective interest rate of 3.1%4.9% at November 30, 2004.

We have various interest rate swap agreements, which effectively convert variable interest rates to fixed interest rates on $300$200 million of outstanding debt related to our homebuilding operations. The interest rate swaps mature at various dates through fiscal 2008 and fix the LIBOR index (to which certain of our debt interest rates are tied) at an average interest rate of 6.8% at November 30, 2004.2005. The net effect on our operating results is that interest on the variable-rate debt being hedged is recorded based on fixed interest rates. Counterparties to these agreements are major financial institutions. At November 30, 2004,2005, the fair market value of the interest rate swaps net of tax, was a $14.2$6.7 million liability. Our Financial Services Division, in the normal course of business, uses derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The Division enters into forward commitments and, to a lesser extent, option contracts to protect the value of loans held-for-sale from increases in market interest rates. We do not anticipate that we will suffer credit losses from counterparty non-performance.

We have met all of our quantifiable debt covenants. There have been no significant changes in liquidity from the balance sheet date to the date of issuance of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as noted above related to the remaining additional commitments of $460 million received under the accordion feature increasing the New Facility to $2.2 billion.

Changes in Capital Structure

In December 2003, our Board of Directors approvedJanuary 2004, we effected a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100% stock dividend of Class A and Class B common stock payable to stockholders of record on January 6, 2004. The additional shares were distributed on January 20, 2004.stock. All share and per share amounts (except authorized shares, treasury shares and par value) have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the split. There was no net effect on total stockholders’ equity as a result of the stock split.

In June 2001, our Board of Directors increasedauthorized our previously authorized stock repurchase program to permit future purchases of up to 20 million shares (adjusted for the January 2004 two-for-one stock split) of our outstanding Class A common stock. In December 2003, we granted approximately 2.4 million stock options (adjusted for our January 2004 two-for-one stock split) to employees under our 2003 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, and in January 2004 we repurchased a similar number of shares of our outstanding Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $109.6 million, or $45.64 per share (adjusted for our January 2004 two-for-one stock split). As of November 30, 2004, 17.6 million Class A common shares can be repurchased in the future under the program. During December 2004 and January 2005, we repurchased a total of 1.95.1 million shares of our outstanding Class A common stock under our stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of $105.3$274.9 million, or $54.39$53.38 per share. As of November 30, 2005, 12.4 million shares of our common stock can be repurchased in the future under the program.

Additionally, duringIn addition to the year ended November 30, 2004,Class A common shares purchased under our stock repurchase program, we repurchased approximately 91,000229,000 Class A common shares related to the vesting of restricted stock and distributions of common stock from our deferred compensation plan.plan during the year ended November 30, 2005.

In September 2004,2005, our Board of Directors voted to increase the annual dividend rate with regard to our Class A and Class B common stock to $0.55$0.64 per share per year (payable quarterly) from $0.50$0.55 per share per year (payable quarterly). Dividend rates reflect our January 2004 two-for-one stock split.

23

In recent years, we have sold convertible and non-convertible debt into public markets, and at year-end, we had a shelf registration statementsstatement effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, under which we could sell to the public up to $320 million$1.0 billion of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock or other securities andsecurities. At November 30, 2005, we had another shelf registration statement effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, under which we could issue up to $400 million of equity or debt securities in connection with acquisitions of companies or interests in companies, businesses or assets.

Based on our current financial condition and credit relationships, we believe that our operations and borrowing resources will provide for our current and long-term capital requirements at our anticipated levels of growth.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We strategically invest in unconsolidated entities that acquire and develop land (1) for our homebuilding operations or for sale to third parties.parties or (2) for the construction of homes for sale to third-party homebuyers. Through these entities, we reduce and share our risk by limiting the amount of our capital invested in land, while increasing access to potential future homesites. The use of these entities also, in some instances, enables us to acquire land to which we could not otherwise obtain access, or could not obtain access on as favorable terms, without the participation of a strategic partner. Our partners in these entities generally are unrelated homebuilders, land sellers and financial or other real estate entities. While we view the use of these entities as beneficial to our homebuilding activities, we do not view them as essential to those activities.

Most of the entities in which we invest are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. At November 30, 2004, we had ownership interests2005, our recorded investment in unconsolidated entities was $1.3 billion and our estimated maximum exposure to loss with regard to unconsolidated entities was our recorded investments in these unconsolidated entities that did not exceed 50%. During 2004, the unconsolidated entities in which we had investments generated $1.6 billion of revenues and incurred $1.2 billion of expenses, resulting in net earnings of $441.8 million. Our share of those net earnings was $90.7 million.addition to the exposure under the guarantees discussed below. In many instances, we are appointed as the day-to-day manager of these entities and receive fees for performing this function. During 2005, 2004 2003 and 2002,2003, we received management fees and reimbursement of expenses totaling $58.6 million, $40.6 million $39.0 million and $29.2$39.0 million, respectively, from unconsolidated entities in which we had investments. We and/or our partners sometimes obtain options or enter into other arrangements under which we can purchase portions of the land held by the unconsolidated entities. Option prices are generally negotiated prices that approximate fair market value when we receive the options. During 2005, 2004 and 2003, and 2002,$431.2 million, $547.6 million $460.5 million and $419.3$460.5 million, respectively, of the unconsolidated entities’ revenues were from land sales to our homebuilding divisions. We do not include in our equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities our pro rata share of unconsolidated entities’ earnings resulting from land sales to our homebuilding divisions. Instead, we account for those earnings as a reduction of our cost of purchasing the land from the unconsolidated entities. This in effect defers recognition of our share of the unconsolidated entities’ earnings related to these sales until we deliver a home is delivered and title passes to a homebuyer.

Summarized operating results for unconsolidated entities in which we had investments were as follows:

At November 30, 2004,2005, the unconsolidated entities in which we had investments had total assets of $4.2$8.8 billion and total liabilities of $2.4$5.5 billion, which included $1.9$4.5 billion of notes and mortgages payable. In some instances, we and/or our partners have provided guarantees onof debt of certain unconsolidated entities on a pro rata basis. At November 30, 2004,2005, we had repayment guarantees of $161.3$324.3 million and limited maintenance guarantees of $319.3$761.1 million related to unconsolidated entity debt. The fair market value of the unconsolidated entity debt ($200.0 million of the limited maintenancerepayment guarantees related to the unconsolidated entity that acquired Newhall).is insignificant. When we and/or our partners provide guarantees, the unconsolidated entity generally receives more favorable terms from its lenders than would otherwise be available to it. The limited maintenance guarantees only apply if an unconsolidated entity defaults on its loan arrangements and the value of the collateral (generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the loan balance. If we are required to make a payment under a limited maintenance guarantee to bring the value of the collateral above the specified

24

percentage of the loan balance, the payment would constitute a capital contribution or loan to the unconsolidated entity and increase our share of any funds it distributes. At November 30, 2005, there were no assets held as collateral that, upon the occurrence of any triggering event or condition under a guarantee, we could obtain and liquidate to recover all or a portion of the amounts to be paid under a guarantee.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at November 30, 2004:2005:

We are subject to the usual obligations associated with entering into contracts (including option contracts) for the purchase, development and sale of real estate in the routine conduct of our business. Option contracts for the purchase of land generally enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties and unconsolidated entities until we are ready to build homes on them. This reduces our financial risksrisk associated with long-term land holdings. At November 30, 2004,2005, we had access to acquire approximately 168,000222,100 homesites through option contracts and unconsolidated entities in which we have investments. At November 30, 2004,2005, we had $222.4$741.6 million of non-refundable option deposits and advanced costs related to certain of these homesites.

We are committed, under various letters of credit, to perform certain development and construction activities and provide certain guarantees in the normal course of business. Outstanding letters of credit under these arrangements totaled $787.4 million$1.2 billion at November 30, 2004.2005. Additionally, we had outstanding performance and surety bonds related to site improvements at various projects with estimated costs to complete of $1.3$1.8 billion. We do not believe thatthere will be any draws upon these bonds, but if there were any, willthey would not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Our Financial Services Division had a pipeline of loans in process totaling approximately $3.1$3.7 billion at November 30, 2004.2005. To minimize credit risk, we use the same credit policies in the approval of our commitments as are applied to our lending activities. Loans in process for which interest rates were committed to the borrowers totaled approximately $519.9$511.7 million as of November 30, 2004.2005. Substantially all of these commitments were for periods of 60 days or less. Since a portion of these commitments is expected to expire without being exercised by the borrowers, the total commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Our Financial Services Division uses mandatory mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) forward commitments and MBS option contracts to hedge its interest rate exposure during the period from when it extends an interest rate lock to a loan applicant until the time at which the loan is sold to an investor. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is managed by entering into MBS forward commitments and MBS option contracts only with investment banks with primary dealer status and loan sales transactions with permanent investors meeting our credit standards. Our risk, in the event of default by the purchaser, is the difference between the contract price and fair market value. At November 30, 2004,2005, we had open commitments amounting to $273.6$321.0 million to sell MBS with varying settlement dates through February 2005.2006.

Economic Conditions

During 2004,2005, the homebuilding environment remained strong due to a positive supply/demand relationship, as well as low interest rates. As a result of this favorable environment and growth in the number of our active communities, our new orders increased by 12%15% in 2004.2005. Although the homebuilding business historically has

25

been cyclical, it has not undergone an economic down cycle in a number of years. Further, during 2005, home prices rose significantly in many of our markets. This has led some people to assert that the prices of land, new homes and the stock prices of homebuilding companies may be inflated and may decline if the demand for new homes weakens. A decline in the prices for new homes could adversely affect both our revenues and gross margins. A decline in our stock price could make raising capital through stock issuances more difficult and expensive.

Market and Financing Risk

We finance our contributions to joint ventures, land acquisition and development activities, construction activities, financial services activities and general operating needs primarily with cash generated from operations and public debt issuances, as well as cash borrowed under our revolving credit facilitiesfacility and warehouse lines of credit. We also purchase land under option agreements, which enables us to acquire homesites when we are ready to build homes on them. The financial risks of adverse market conditions associated with land holdings are managed by prudent underwriting of land purchases in areas we view as desirable growth markets, careful management of the land development process and limitation of risks by using partners to share the costs of purchasing and developing land, as well as obtaining access to land through option contracts.

Seasonality

We have historically experienced variability in our results of operations from quarter-to-quarter due to the seasonal nature of the homebuilding business. We typically experience the highest rate of orders for new homes in the first half of the calendar year, although the rate of orders for new homes is highly dependent on the number of active communities and the timing of new community openings. We typically have a greater percentage of new home deliveries in the second half of our fiscal year compared to the first half because new home deliveries trail orders for new homes by several months. As a result, our revenues and operating earnings from sales of homes are generally higher in the second half of our fiscal year.

Interest Rates and Changing Prices

Inflation can have a long-term impact on us because increasing costs of land, materials and labor result in a need to increase the sales prices of homes. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which can have a negative impact on housing demand and the costs of financing land development activities and housing construction. Rising interest rates, as well as increased materials and labor costs, may reduce gross margins. In recent years, the increases in these costs have followed the general rate of inflation and hence have not had a significant adverse impact on us. In addition, deflation can impact the value of real estate and make it difficult for us to recover our land costs. Therefore, either inflation or deflation could adversely impact our future results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission released SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 105,Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. SAB No. 105 provides the SEC staff position regarding the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to loan commitments that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for resale. SAB No. 105 contains specific guidance on the inputs to a valuation-recognition model to measure loan commitments accounted for at fair market value. Previous accounting guidance required the commitment to be recognized on the balance sheet at fair market value from its inception through its expiration or funding. SAB No. 105 requires that fair-value measurement include only differences between the guaranteed interest rate in the loan commitment and a market interest rate, excluding any expected future cash flows related to the customer relationship or loan servicing. In addition, SAB No. 105 requires the disclosure of both the accounting policy for loan commitments, including the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair market value of loan commitments, and any associated hedging strategies. SAB No. 105 is effective for all loan commitments accounted for as derivatives and entered into subsequent to March 31, 2004. The implementation of SAB No. 105 did not have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Staff Position 109-1,Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004(“FSP 109-1”). The American Jobs Creation Act, which was signed into law in October 2004, provides a tax deduction on qualified domestic production activities. When fully phased-in, the deduction will be up to 9% of the lesser of “qualified production activities income” or taxable income. Based on the guidance provided by FSP 109-1, this deduction should be accounted for as a special deduction under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R)109,Accounting for Income Taxes, and will reduce tax expense in the period or periods that the amounts are deductible on the tax return. FSP 109-1 was effective December 21, 2004 and the tax benefit resulting from the new deduction will be effective beginning in our first quarter of fiscal year 2006, which begins December 1, 2005. We are evaluating the impact of this law on our future financial statements and currently estimate the future reduction in our federal income tax rate to be approximately 75 basis points.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). SFAS No. 123(R) establishes accounting standards for transactions in which a company exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. In particular, this Statement wouldthe statement will require companies to record compensation expense for all share-based payments, such as employee stock options, at fair market value. This Statement’sThe statement’s effective date is the first quarterinterim or annual reporting period of the first fiscal year that begins on or after June 15, 2005 (our first quarter of fiscal quarter beginningyear 2006 which begins December 1, 2005). We are currently reviewingestimate that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will result in a charge to net earnings of approximately $0.09 per share diluted for the year ending November 30, 2006.

26

In March 2005, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107,Share-Based Payment(“SAB No. 107”). SAB No. 107 provides the SEC staff position regarding the application of SFAS No. 123(R). SAB No. 107 contains interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. SAB No. 107 also highlights the importance of disclosures made related to the accounting for share-based payment transactions.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154,Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (“SFAS No. 154”). SFAS No. 154, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20,Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in an accounting principle. The statement requires retrospective application of changes in an accounting principle to prior periods’ financial statements unless it is impracticable to determine the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of this Statementthe change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005 (our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2006). The adoption of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.position, results of operations or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements.statements included in Item 8 of this document. As discussed in Note 1, the preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to our consolidated financial statements. Listed below are those policies and estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of significant judgment in their application.

Homebuilding Operations

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from sales of homes are recognized when sales are closed and title passes to the new homeowners. Revenues from sales of land are recognized when a significant down payment is received, the earnings process is

complete, title passes and collectibility of the receivable is reasonably assured. We believe that the accounting policy related to revenue recognition is a critical accounting policy because of the significance of revenue recognition.

Effective December 1, 2004, as a result of the determination that we met all applicable requirements under SFAS No. 66,Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, we began to apply the percentage-of-completion method to our mid-to-high-rise condominiums under construction. In accordance with SFAS No. 66, we record a portion of the value of condominium home contracts as revenue when (1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage, (2) the buyer is committed to the extent of being unable to require a full refund except for non-delivery of the home, (3) sufficient homes have already been sold to assure the entire property will not revert to rental property, (4) sales prices are collectible and (5) aggregate sales proceeds and costs can be reasonably estimated. Revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method is calculated based upon the percentage of total costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs to complete, and is adjusted for estimated cancellations due to potential customer defaults. The change to the percentage-of-completion method did not have a material impact on our financial condition as of November 30, 2005, or our results of operations or cash flows for the year ended November 30, 2005. Actual revenues and costs to complete construction in the future could differ from our current estimates. If our estimates of revenues and development costs change, then our revenues, cost of sales and related cumulative profits will be revised in the period that estimates change.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at cost, unless the inventory within a community is determined to be impaired, in which case the impaired inventory would be written down to fair market value. Inventory costs include land, land development and home construction costs, real estate taxes, deposits on land purchase contracts and interest related to development and construction. Land, land development, amenities and other costs are accumulated by specific area and allocated to homes within the respective areas.

27

We evaluate our inventory for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. Accounting standards require that if the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from an asset is less than the reported value of the asset, an asset impairment must be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The amount of impairment to recognize is calculated by subtracting the fair market value of the asset from the carrying value of the asset.

We believe that the accounting estimate related to inventory valuation and impairment is a critical accounting estimate because: (1) it is highly susceptible to change due to the assumptions about future sales and cost of sales and (2) the impact of recognizing impairments on the assets reported in our consolidated balance sheets, as well as our net earnings, could be material. Our assumptions about future home sales prices and volumes require significant judgment because historically the residential homebuilding industry ishas been cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. Although the homebuilding business historically has been cyclical, it has not undergone a down cycle in a number of years.

No material impairment charges were recorded during the years ended November 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003. While no material impairment existed as of November 30, 2004,2005, there can be no assurances that future economic or financial developments, including general interest rate increases or a slowdown in the economy, might not lead to an impairment of inventory.

Warranty Costs

Although we subcontract virtually all segments of construction to others and our contracts call for the subcontractors to repair or replace any deficient items related to their trade, we are primarily responsible to correct any deficiencies. Additionally, in some instances, we may be held responsible for the actions of or losses incurred by subcontractors. Warranty reserves are established at an amount estimated to be adequate to cover potential costs for materials and labor with regard to warranty-type claims expected to be incurred subsequent to the delivery of a home. Reserves are determined based upon historical data and trends with respect to similar product types and geographical areas. We believe the accounting estimate related to the reserve for warranty costs is a critical accounting estimate because the estimate requires a large degree of judgment.

At November 30, 2004,2005, the reserve for warranty costs was $116.8$144.9 million. While we believe that the reserve for warranty costs is adequate, there can be no assurances that historical data and trends will accurately predict our actual warranty costs. Additionally, there can be no assurances that future economic or financial developments might not lead to a significant change in the reserve.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

We frequently invest in entities that acquire and develop land for sale to us in connection with our homebuilding operations or for sale to third parties. Our partners generally are unrelated homebuilders, land sellers and financial or other real estate entities.strategic partners.

Most of the unconsolidated entities through which we acquire and develop land are accounted for by the equity method of accounting because we are not the primary beneficiary, as defined under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“FIN 46(R)”),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and we have a significant, but less than controlling, interest in the entities. We record our investments in these entities in our consolidated balance sheets as

“Investments “Investments in Unconsolidated Entities” and our pro rata share of the entities’ earnings or losses in our consolidated statements of earnings as “Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities,” as described in Note 56 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Advances to these entities are included in the investment balance.

Management uses its judgment when determining if we are the primary beneficiary of, or have a controlling interest in, an unconsolidated entity. Factors considered in determining whether we have significant influence or we have control include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of the other partners, voting rights, involvement in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and continuing involvement. The accounting policy relating to the use of the equity method of accounting is a critical accounting policy due to the judgment required in determining whether we are the primary beneficiary or have control or significant influence.

As of November 30, 2004,2005, we believe that the equity method of accounting is appropriate for our investments in unconsolidated entities where we are not the primary beneficiary and we do not have a controlling interest, but rather share control with our partners. At November 30, 2004,2005, the unconsolidated entities in which we had investments had total assets of $4.2$8.8 billion and total liabilities of $2.4$5.5 billion.

28

Financial Services Operations

Revenue Recognition

Loan origination revenues, net of direct origination costs, are recognized when the related loans are sold. Gains and losses from the sale of loans and loan servicing rights are recognized when the loans are sold and shipped to an investor. Premiums from title insurance policies are recognized as revenue on the effective dates of the policies. Escrow fees are recognized at the time the related real estate transactions are completed, usually upon the close of escrow. Interest income on mortgage loans held-for-sale is recognized as earned over the terms of the mortgage loans based on the contractual interest rates. In all circumstances, we do not recognize revenue until the earnings process is complete and collectibility of the receivable is reasonably assured. We believe that the accounting policy related to revenue recognition is a critical accounting policy because of the significance of revenue recognition.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We provide an allowance for loan losses when and if we determine that loans or portions of them are not likely to be collected. In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we consider various factors such as past loan loss experience, regulatory examinations, present economic conditions and other factors considered relevant by management. Anticipated changes in economic conditions, which may influence the level of the allowance, are considered in the evaluation by management when the likelihood of the changes can be reasonably determined. This analysis is based on judgments and estimates and may change in response to economic developments or other conditions that may influence borrowers’ financial conditions or prospects. At November 30, 2004,2005, the allowance for loan losses was $1.4$1.2 million. While we believe that the 20042005 year-end allowance was adequate, particularly in view of the fact that we usually sell the loans in the secondary mortgage market on a non-recourse basis within 4560 days after we originate them, there can be no assurances that future economic or financial developments, including general interest rate increases or a slowdown in the economy, might not lead to increased provisions to the allowance or a higher occurenceoccurrence of loan charge-offs. This allowance requires management’s judgment and estimate. For these reasons, we believe that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting estimate.

Homebuilding and Financial Services Operations

Goodwill Valuation

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair market value of net assets acquired. The process of determining goodwill requires judgment. Evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the determination of the fair market value of our reporting units. Inherent in such fair market value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations, and our strategic plans with regard to our operations. To the extent additional information arises or our strategies change, it

is possible that our conclusion regarding goodwill impairment could change, which could have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations. For those reasons, we believe that the accounting estimate related to goodwill impairment is a critical accounting estimate.

We review goodwill annually (or more frequently under certain conditions) for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.We performed our annual impairment test of goodwill as of September 30, 20042005 and determined that goodwill was not impaired.

At November 30, 2004,2005, goodwill was $239.4 million (net of accumulated amortization of $18.0 million).$253.1 million. While we believe that no impairment existed as of November 30, 2004,2005, there can be no assurances that future economic or financial developments, including general interest rate increases or a slowdown in the economy, might not lead to an impairment of goodwill.

Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets

We record income taxes under the asset and liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and attributable to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the changes are enacted.

29

We believe that the accounting estimate for the valuation of deferred tax assets is a critical accounting estimate because judgment is required in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. We base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates and, in certain cases, business plans and other expectations about future outcomes. Changes in existing tax laws or rates could affect actual tax results and future business results may affect the amount of deferred tax liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time. Our accounting for deferred tax consequences represents our best estimate of future events. Although it is possible there will be changes that are not anticipated in our current estimates, we believe it is unlikely such changes would have a material period-to-period impact on our financial position or results of operations.

At November 30, 2004,2005, our net deferred tax asset was $126.8$111.1 million. Based on our assessment, it appears more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be realized through future taxable earnings.

Stock-Based Compensation

With the approval of a committee consisting of members of our Board of Directors, from time-to-time we occasionally issue to employees options to purchase our common stock. The committee approves grants only from amounts remaining available for grant that were formally authorized by our common stockholders. We grant approved options with an exercise price not less than the market price of the common stock on the date of the option grant. We account for options under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and, accordingly, recognize no compensation expense for the grants. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Compensation—Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, require us to disclose the effects on net earnings and basic and diluted earnings per share had we recorded compensation expense in accordance with SFAS No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) establishes accounting standards for transactions in which a company exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. In particular, this Statement wouldthe statement will require companies to record compensation expense for all share-based payments, such as employee stock options, at fair market value. This Statement’sThe statement’s effective date is the first quarterinterim or annual reporting period of the first fiscal year that begins on or after June 15, 2005 (our first quarter of fiscal quarteryear 2006 beginning December 1, 2005). We are currently reviewingestimate that the effectadoption of SFAS No. 123(R) on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2005, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107,Share-Based Payment(“SAB No. 107”). SAB No. 107 provides the SEC staff position regarding the application of SFAS No. 123(R). SAB No. 107 contains interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, as well as provides the staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. SAB No. 107 also highlights the importance of disclosures made related to the accounting for share-based payment transactions.

We believe that the accounting estimate for the valuation of share-based payment is a critical accounting estimate because judgment is required in determining the valuation of the stock options granted to employees.

30

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our investments, debt obligations, mortgage loans held-for-sale and mortgage loans held-for-sale.held-for-investment. We utilize derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, in conjunction with our overall strategy to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. We also utilize forward commitments and option contracts to mitigate the risks associated with our mortgage loan portfolio.

The tablestable on the following pages providepage provides information at November 30, 2004 and 20032005 about our significant derivative financial instruments and other financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For investments available-for-sale, mortgage loans held-for-sale, mortgage loans held-for-investment and investments held-to-maturity, investments, senior notes and other debts payable and notes and other debts payable, the tables present principal cash flows and related weighted average effective interest rates by expected maturity dates and estimated fair market values at November 30, 2004 and 2003.2005. Weighted average variable interest rates are based on the variable interest rates at November 30, 2004 and 2003.2005. For interest rate swaps, the tables presenttable presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates and estimated fair market values at November 30, 2004 and 2003.2005. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual cash flows to be exchanged under the contracts. Our limited-purpose finance subsidiaries have placed mortgages and other receivables as collateral for various long-term financings. These limited-purpose finance subsidiaries pay the principal of, and interest on, these financings almost entirely from the cash flows generated by the related pledged collateral and are excluded from the following tables.table. Our trading investments do not have interest rate sensitivity, and therefore, are also excluded from the following tables.

See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 and Notes 1 and 1416 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 for a further discussion of these items and our strategy of mitigating our interest rate risk.

Information Regarding Interest Rate Sensitivity31

Principal (Notional) Amount by

Expected Maturity and Average Interest Rate

November 30, 2004