UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2)1
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007,2009,
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32601
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-3247759 | |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9348 Civic Center Drive
Beverly Hills, CA 90210California
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(310) 867-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class | Name of Each Exchange on which Registered | |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value per Share; Preferred Stock Purchase Rights | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. xAct of 1933. Yes ¨þ No¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ YesNo xþ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. xYes ¨þ No¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period thanthat the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨Yes ¨ No¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large | Accelerated filer | |
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ YesNo xþ No
OnAs of June 30, 2007,2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Stockcommon stock beneficially held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.2 billion.$341.8 million. (For purposes hereof, directors, executive officers and 10% or greater shareholdersstockholders have been deemed affiliates).
On February 22, 2008,19, 2010, there were 74,938,143171,676,593 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01$.01 par value per share.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portionsshare, including 3,026,724 shares of our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2008 Annual Meeting, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end, are incorporated by reference into Part III.unvested restricted stock awards and excluding 1,979,053 shares held in treasury.
Explanatory Note
On February 29, 2008,References to “Live Nation,” “we,” “our,” “us” or the “company” refer to Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (“, which was formerly known as Live Nation” orNation, Inc., references to “Ticketmaster” refer to Ticketmaster Entertainment LLC, which was formerly known as Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., and references to the “Company”“merger” refer to the merger of Ticketmaster with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Live Nation.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Live Nation is filing this Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K/A”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”(the “SEC”) its Annual Report on February 25, 2010 (the “Original Form 10-K”), to add information required in Part III of the Original Form 10-K. There are no changes to the disclosure in the Original Form 10-K. This Form 10-K/A does not reflect any events that occurred after the date of the Original Form 10-K. No attempt has been made in this Form 10-K/A to modify or update our previously reported financial results or other disclosure as presented in the Original Form 10-K, except for Parts III and IV thereof, as referenced herein.
The information in Part III referred to above was to be incorporated into the Original Form 10-K by reference to our 2010 Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. Our Proxy Statement will not, however, be filed with the SEC within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. The Company then filed an Amendment No. 1 to2009, and we are therefore filing this Form 10-K for10-K/A so that such information is incorporated within the year ended December 31, 2007 (“Amendment No. 1”) with the SEC on March 31, 2008, solely to amendrequired time period.
Additionally, we are revising Part IV, Item 15 to incorporate by reference the exhibits we filed with the Original Form 10-K and to include Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, the separatecertifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial statements of Broadway in Chicago, L.L.C. (“BIC”)officer, which, as required underby Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X. The audit12b-15 of the financial statementsSecurities Exchange Act of BIC, whose fiscal year ends December 31, was not completed at the time the Company originally1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are filed its Annual Report onas exhibits to this Form 10-K. The audited financial statements were included under Item 15(a)(2) of Amendment No. 1.10-K/A.
This Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (“Amendment No. 2”) of Live Nation is being filed solely to amend Item 15 to include the separate financial statements of BIC pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X which requires inclusion of audited balance sheets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and income statements for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and related notes. The income statement for the year ended December 31, 2005, was not included under Item 15(a)(2) of Amendment No. 1. The audited financial statements for that period are now included under Item 15(a)(2) of this Amendment No. 2.
LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-K/A
|
SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
PART IV
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 45 |
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Our Directors
The following sets forth information as to persons who currently serve as our directors.
Our bylaws provide that our business will be managed by, or under the direction of our board of directors. The directors are apportioned into three classes, with each serving a three-year term. We currently have five Class I directors, five Class II directors and four Class III directors. Set forth below is biographical information for our directors:
Name | Age | Position | Class |
(a)1. Financial Statements.Irving L. Azoff
The following consolidatedExecutive Chairman and combined financial statements are included in Item 8Director
Mark Carleton
Director
Barry Diller
Chairman of the Company’sBoard
Jonathan Dolgen
Director
Ariel Emanuel
Director
Robert Ted Enloe, III
Director
Jeffrey T. Hinson
Director
James S. Kahan
Director
Victor Kaufman
Director
John C. Malone
Director
Randall T. Mays
Director
Jonathan F. Miller
Director
Michael Rapino
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Mark S. Shapiro
Director
Irving L. Azoff is our Executive Chairman along with serving on our board of directors and has served in these capacities since January 2010. From October 2008 to January 2010, Mr. Azoff was Chief Executive Officer of Ticketmaster. He also served as a member of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from January 2009 until the merger. Mr. Azoff has served as Chief Executive Officer of Front Line Management Group, Inc., or Front Line, since its inception in January 2005.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Azoff should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his leadership skills acquired while building Front Line Management and serving as Chief Executive Officer of Ticketmaster, his extensive knowledge and understanding of and reputation in the music industry and his understanding of Ticketmaster’s business, operations, products and services.
Mark Carleton has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2010 and served as a member of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from August 2008 until the merger. He currently serves as a Senior Vice President of Liberty Media Corporation. Prior to that, he was employed by KPMG LLP from July 1982 to November 2003, most recently as a Partner and National Industry Director—Communications Segment and also served on KPMG’s Board. Mr. Carleton was a practicing CPA during his time at KPMG. Mr. Carleton currently serves as a director of Mobile Streams, Air Methods Corp. and a number of private companies and formerly served as a director of DIRECTV.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Carleton should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his current and previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public and private company boards and his specialized expertise in public company accounting.
Barry Diller has served as Chairman of our board of directors since January 2010 and served as Chairman of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from August 2008 until the merger. He has been a Director and the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IAC/InterActiveCorp, or IAC (and its predecessors), since August 1995. Mr. Diller also serves as the Chairman of Expedia, Inc., which position he has held since August 2005. Prior to joining IAC, Mr. Diller was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of QVC, Inc. from December 1992 through December 1994. From 1984 to 1992, Mr. Diller served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Fox, Inc. Prior to joining Fox, Inc. Mr. Diller served for 10 years as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Pictures Corporation. Mr. Diller is currently a member of the board of directors of The Washington Post Company and The Coca-Cola Company. He also serves on the Board of Conservation International and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In addition, Mr. Diller is a member of the Board of Councilors for the University of Southern California’s School of Cinema-Television, the New York University Board of Trustees and the Executive Board for the Medical Sciences of University of California, Los Angeles.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Diller should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his current and previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public and private company boards, his extensive experience with entertainment and media companies and his background and experience in internet media.
Jonathan Dolgen has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2010 and served as a member of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from August 2008 until the merger. From July 2004 through April 2010, Mr. Dolgen had also been a Senior Advisor to Viacom, Inc., which is referred to as Old Viacom, a worldwide entertainment and media company, where he provided advisory services to the Chief Executive Officer of Old Viacom, or others designated by him, on an as-requested basis. Effective December 31, 2005, Old Viacom was separated into two publicly traded companies, Viacom Inc., which is referred to as New Viacom, and CBS Corporation. Since the separation of Old Viacom, Mr. Dolgen had provided advisory services to the Chief Executive Officer of New Viacom, or others designated by him, on an as-requested basis. Since July 2004, Mr. Dolgen has been a private investor, and since September 2004, Mr. Dolgen has been a principal of Wood River Ventures, LLC, or Wood River, a private start-up entity that seeks investment and other opportunities and provides consulting services primarily in the media sector. Since April 2005, Mr. Dolgen, through Wood River, has had an arrangement with Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC to seek investment opportunities, and to consult, primarily in the media sector. From October 2006 through March 2008, Mr. Dolgen served as Senior Consultant for ArtistDirect, Inc. From April 1994 to July 2004, Mr. Dolgen served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Viacom Entertainment Group, a unit of Old Viacom, where he oversaw various operations of Old Viacom’s businesses, which during 2003 and 2004 primarily included the operations engaged in motion picture production and distribution, television production and distribution, regional theme parks, theatrical exhibition and publishing. As a result of the separation of Old Viacom, Old Viacom’s motion picture production and distribution and theatrical exhibition business became part of New Viacom’s businesses, and substantially all of the remaining businesses of Old Viacom overseen by Mr. Dolgen remained with CBS Corporation. Mr. Dolgen began his career in the entertainment industry in 1976 and, until joining the Viacom Entertainment Group, served in executive positions at Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox and Fox, Inc. and Sony Pictures Entertainment. Since August 2005, Mr. Dolgen has been a Director of Expedia, Inc. and from October 2004 until September 2008, Mr. Dolgen was a Director of Charter Communications, Inc.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Dolgen should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public company boards, his extensive experience with companies in the media sector and expertise in both traditional and new media.
Ariel Emanuel has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2007. Mr. Emanuel was a founding partner of Endeavor, a leading talent agency that merged with the William Morris Agency in 2009, creating WME Entertainment. Mr. Emanuel was an integral part of Endeavor’s success and provided its vision. Mr. Emanuel is now Co-CEO of WME Entertainment. Mr. Emanuel is also a member of the Board of Trustees of the American Film Institute.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Emanuel should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his leadership skills acquired while building Endeavor and serving as Co-CEO of WME Entertainment, his extensive knowledge and understanding of and reputation in the entertainment industry and his expertise in artist representation.
Robert Ted Enloe, IIIhas served as a member of our board of directors since December 2006. Mr. Enloe has been Managing General Partner of Balquita Partners, Ltd., a family securities and real estate investment partnership, since 1996, and he currently serves as a director of Leggett & Platt Inc., Silicon Laboratories Inc. and Aptuit, Inc. Mr. Enloe’s former positions include Vice Chairman of the Board and member of the Office of the Chief Executive for Compaq Computer Corporation and president of Lomas Financial Corporation and Liberte Investors.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Enloe should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public and private company boards, his extensive experience with technology companies and his financial expertise.
Jeffrey T. Hinsonhas served as a member of our board of directors since December 2005. Mr. Hinson has been President of YouPlus Media, LLC since June 2009. Previously, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Border Media Partners, LLC from July 2007 to July 2009, was a private financial consultant from July 2005 to June 2007 and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Univision Communications Inc. from March 2004 to June 2005. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Univision Radio, the radio division of Univision, from September 2003 to March 2004. From 1997 to 2003, Mr. Hinson served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation, which was acquired by Univision in 2003 and became the radio division of Univision. Mr. Hinson also serves as a director of TiVo Inc. and Windstream Corporation.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Hinson should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public company boards, his extensive experience with companies in the media sector and his financial expertise.
James S. Kahan has served as a member of our board of directors since September 2007. Mr. Kahan is a former executive of AT&T where he spent nearly 38 years. During his tenure at AT&T and its predecessors, he oversaw approximately $300 billion of acquisitions and divestitures, including the acquisitions of Pacific Telesis (1997), Southern New England Telecommunications (1998), Ameritech (1999) and the former AT&T Corp. (2005), as well as Cingular Wireless’ acquisition of AT&T Wireless (2004). He was also responsible for AT&T’s acquisition of BellSouth Corp. in 2006. Mr. Kahan serves as a director of Amdocs Ltd., which provides software products and services to the communications industry worldwide.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Kahan should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public and private company boards and his financial and mergers and acquisitions expertise.
Victor Kaufman has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2010 and served as a member of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from August 2008 until the merger. He has been a Director of IAC (and its predecessors) since December 1996 and has been Vice Chairman of IAC since October 1999. Mr. Kaufman also serves as Vice Chairman of the Board of Expedia, Inc., which position he has held since August 2005. Previously, Mr. Kaufman served in the Office of the Chairman from January 1997 to November 1997 and as Chief Financial Officer of IAC from November 1997 to October 1999. Prior to his tenure with IAC, Mr. Kaufman served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Savoy Pictures Entertainment, Inc. from March 1992 and as a director of Savoy from February 1992. Mr. Kaufman was the founding Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-Star Pictures, Inc. and served in such capacities from 1983 until 1987, at which time he became President and Chief Executive Officer of Tri-Star’s successor company, Columbia Pictures Entertainment, Inc. He resigned from these positions at the end of 1989 following the acquisition of Columbia by Sony USA, Inc. Mr. Kaufman joined Columbia in 1974 and served in a variety of senior positions at Columbia and its affiliates prior to the founding of Tri-Star.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Kaufman should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public company boards, his extensive experience with companies in the media sector and expertise in both traditional and new media.
John C. Malone has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2010. He is Chairman of Liberty Media Corporation, a position he has held since 1990. Dr. Malone is also the Chairman of the Board of Liberty Global, Inc., a position he has held since June 2005. From 1996 to 1999, when Tele-Communications, Inc., or TCI, merged with AT&T Corp., he was also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of TCI. Previous to that, from 1973 to 1996, Dr. Malone served as President and CEO of TCI. He currently serves on the board of directors for Ascent Media Corporation, CATO Institute, DIRECTV, Expedia, Inc., Discovery Communications, Inc., SIRIUS XM and IAC. Additionally, Dr. Malone is Chairman Emeritus of the Board for Cable Television Laboratories, Inc., as well as Director or similar capacity for various family businesses, trusts and foundations.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Dr. Malone should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his leadership and reputation in the media and communications sectors, previously held senior-executive level positions and his service on other public and private company boards.
Randall T. Mays has served as a member of our board of directors since our formation. He serves as the Vice Chairman of Clear Channel Communications, Inc., or Clear Channel. Previously, he served as President and Chief Financial Officer of Clear Channel. Mr. Mays has served on the board of directors of Clear Channel since April 1999 and has served on the board of directors of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. since 1997.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Mays should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public and private company boards and his financial, media and advertising expertise.
Jonathan F. Miller has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2010 and served as a member of Ticketmaster’s board of directors from August 2008 until the merger. Mr. Miller is the Chairman and Chief Executive of News Corp.’s digital media group, a position which he has held since April 2009. He was a founding partner of Velocity Interactive Group, an investment firm focusing on the Internet and digital media, from its inception in February 2007 until April 2009. Prior to founding Velocity, Mr. Miller served as Chief Executive Officer of America Online Inc., or AOL. Mr. Miller began his career at AOL in late 2002. Prior to joining AOL, Mr. Miller was employed at IAC as Chief Executive Officer and President of USA Information and Services. Mr. Miller is on the Board of American Film Institute, Idearc Media and a trustee of Emerson College and WNCY Public Radio in New York.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Miller should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public company boards, his extensive experience with companies in the media sector and expertise in both traditional and new media.
Michael Rapino is our President and Chief Executive Officer and has served in this capacity since August 2005. He has also served on our board of directors since December 2005. From August 2004 to August 2005, Mr. Rapino was Chief Executive Officer and President of our predecessor’s Global Music division.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Rapino should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, his leadership skills acquired prior to and while serving as Chief Executive Officer of Live Nation, his extensive knowledge and understanding of and reputation in the music industry and his understanding of Live Nation’s business, operations, products and services.
Mark S. Shapiro has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2008. Mr. Shapiro is President and Chief Executive Officer of Six Flags, Inc., the world’s largest regional theme park company. Prior to joining Six Flags in 2005, Mr. Shapiro spent 12 years at ESPN, Inc. where he served as Executive Vice President, Programming and Production and in various other capacities. During his tenure, he garnered 16 Emmy Awards and the first two Peabody Awards won by ESPN. Six Flags filed a voluntary petition to restructure its debt obligations under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on June 13, 2009. Mr. Shapiro is also a director of The Tribune Company and Equity Residential. The Tribune Company filed a voluntary petition to restructure its debt obligations under Chapter 11 on December 8, 2008.
The following experience, qualifications, attributes and/or skills led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Shapiro should serve as a director: his professional background and experience, previously held senior-executive level positions, his service on other public company boards and his extensive experience with companies in the entertainment sector.
Our Executive Officers and Key Employees
The following sets forth information regarding our executive officers and other key employees:
Name | Age | Position | ||
Michael Rapino | 44 | President and Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Irving L. Azoff | 62 | Executive Chairman and Director | ||
Brian Capo | 43 | Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Arthur Fogel | 56 | Chief Executive Officer—Global Touring and Chairman—Global Music | ||
Jason Garner | 37 | Chief Executive Officer—Global Music | ||
John Hopmans | 51 | Executive Vice President—Mergers and Acquisitions and Strategic Finance | ||
Nathan Hubbard | 34 | Chief Executive Officer—Ticketing | ||
Thomas Johansson | 61 | Chairman—International Music | ||
Alan Ridgeway | 43 | Chief Executive Officer—International Music | ||
Michael Rowles | 44 | General Counsel and Secretary | ||
Kathy Willard | 43 | Chief Financial Officer |
Michael Rapino is our President and Chief Executive Officer and has served in this capacity since August 2005. He has also served on our board of directors since December 2005. From August 2004 to August 2005, Mr. Rapino was Chief Executive Officer and President of our predecessor’s Global Music division.
Irving L. Azoff is our Executive Chairman along with serving on our board of directors and has served in these capacities since January 2010. From October 2008 to January 2010, Mr. Azoff was Chief Executive Officer of Ticketmaster. He also served on Ticketmaster’s board of directors since January 2009. Mr. Azoff has served as Chief Executive Officer of Front Line since its inception in January 2005.
Brian Capo is our Chief Accounting Officer and has served in this capacity since December 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Capo served as a Senior Finance Director at BMC Software, Inc. from November 2005 to November 2007. From August 2004 to October 2005, he served as a Finance Director at Waste Management, Inc.
Arthur Fogelis the Chief Executive Officer of our Global Touring division and Chairman of our Global Music group and has served in these capacities since 2005. Previously, Mr. Fogel served as President of our Music Touring division since 1999.
Jason Garneris the Chief Executive Officer of our Global Music group and has served in this capacity since September 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Garner held various positions within our North American Music division including President and Chief Executive Officer.
John Hopmansis our Executive Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions and Strategic Finance and has served in this capacity since April 2008. Previously, Mr. Hopmans served in several capacities at Scotia Capital including Managing Director, Industry Head, Private Equity Sponsor Coverage and as Managing Director, Industry Head, Diversified Industries since joining them in 1991.
Nathan Hubbardis the Chief Executive Officer of our Ticketing division and has served in this capacity since June 2008. From January 2008 to May 2008, Mr. Hubbard served as President of the Ticketing division. Prior to that, Mr. Hubbard was Chief Executive Officer of Musictoday.
Thomas Johanssonis the Chairman of our International Music division and has served in this capacity since September 2004. Previously, Mr. Johansson served as the Chief Executive Officer of our subsidiary EMA Telstar Group, a company he founded in April 1969 and which our predecessor acquired in 1999.
Alan Ridgewayis the Chief Executive Officer of our International Music division and has served in this capacity since September 2007. From September 2005 to August 2007, Mr. Ridgeway was our Chief Financial Officer. Prior to that, Mr. Ridgeway served as President of our European Music division.
Michael Rowlesis our General Counsel and has served in this capacity since March 2006 and as our Secretary since May 2007. Previously, Mr. Rowles served as General Counsel and Secretary of Entravision Communications Corporation since September 2000.
Kathy Willardis our Chief Financial Officer and has served in this capacity since September 2007. From September 2005 to August 2007, Ms. Willard was our Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to that, Ms. Willard served as Chief Financial Officer of our predecessor from December 2004 to September 2005.
Board and Committees
Board Meetings
Our board of directors met ten times during 2009. All incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of the board of directors and of board committees on which they served during the time they were serving as a director or committee member, as applicable. We have adopted a formal policy on director attendance at annual meetings of stockholders, which states that each director is strongly encouraged to attend such meetings, unless attendance is precluded by health or other significant personal matters. Six of our then-current directors attended our 2009 annual meeting of stockholders.
The board of directors has appointed Mr. Diller to preside over executive sessions of the non-management directors.
Board Committees
The board of directors has three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee, each of which is described below. Each committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors. All of the committee charters are publicly available on our website atwww.livenation.com/investors or may be obtained upon written request to our General Counsel at our principal executive offices.
Committee members are elected by the board of directors, upon the Nominating and Governance Committee’s recommendations, and serve until their successors are elected or their earlier resignation or removal. The current composition of the board committees is as follows:
Audit Committee | Nominating and Governance Committee | Compensation Committee | |||||||||||||||
Mark Carleton | ü | ||||||||||||||||
Jonathan Dolgen | ü | ü | ü | (Chair | ) | ||||||||||||
Ariel Emanuel | ü | ||||||||||||||||
Robert Ted Enloe, III | ü | ||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey T. Hinson | ü | (Chair | ) | ||||||||||||||
James S. Kahan | ü | ||||||||||||||||
Victor Kaufman | ü | ||||||||||||||||
Randall T. Mays | ü | (Chair) | |||||||||||||||
Mark S. Shapiro | ü |
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Dolgen, Hinson and Kahan. The board of directors has determined that all three members of the Audit Committee are independent, as defined by the NYSE corporate governance standards, Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and our independence standards. The board of directors has also determined that each Audit Committee member is financially literate and that both Messrs. Hinson and Kahan have the attributes of an audit committee financial expert as defined in the applicable SEC regulations. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Audit Committee met five times.
As set forth in more detail in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee’s purpose is to assist the board of directors in its general oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The specific responsibilities of the Audit Committee include:
appointing, compensating, overseeing and terminating the independent registered public accounting firm;
approving all audit and non-audit services (other than those non-audit services prohibited by law) to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm;
reviewing and discussing the annual and quarterly financial statements and related notes and the specific disclosures under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”;
reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm any audit problems or difficulties and management’s responses thereto;
discussing earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies, if any;
reporting regularly to the full board of directors regarding, among other things, the quality and integrity of our financial statements, compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, the performance and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and the performance of the internal audit function;
maintaining free and open communications with, and periodically meeting with, management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm;
discussing guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management;
overseeing our Policy on Related-Person Transactions, as amended and supplemented from time to time;
preparing the Report of the Audit Committee for inclusion in our annual proxy statements; and
complying with all other responsibilities and duties set forth in the Audit Committee Charter.
At the beginning of 2009, the Audit Committee consisted of Messrs. Hinson, Kahan and Enloe. In January 2010, Mr. Enloe stepped down from the Audit Committee and Mr. Dolgen was appointed to the Audit Committee.
For additional information concerning the Audit Committee, see “Report of the Audit Committee” included in this Proxy Statement.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee currently consists of Messrs. Dolgen, Emanuel, Kaufman and Mays.
The board of directors has determined that all four members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent, as defined by the NYSE corporate governance standards and our independence standards. The Nominating and Governance Committee met once during the 2009 fiscal year.
The specific responsibilities of the Nominating and Governance Committee include:
identifying, screening and recruiting qualified individuals to become Board members;
proposing nominations for the board of directors and board committee membership;
assessing the composition of the board of directors and board committees;
overseeing the performance of the board of directors and management; and
complying with all other responsibilities and duties set forth in the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter.
At the beginning of 2009, the Nominating and Governance Committee consisted of Mr. Kahan and Connie McCombs McNab. In January 2010, Ms. McNab resigned from the board of directors, Mr. Kahan stepped down from the Nominating and Governance Committee and Messrs. Dolgen, Emanuel, Kaufman and Mays were appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Carleton, Dolgen, Enloe and Shapiro.
The board of directors has determined that all four members of the Compensation Committee are independent, as defined by the NYSE corporate governance standards and our independence standards. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee met three times.
The specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include:
establishing the base salary, incentive compensation and all other compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management;
overseeing the administration of our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans;
preparing the Report of the Compensation Committee for inclusion in our proxy statements;
overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for inclusion in our proxy statements; and
complying with all other responsibilities and duties set forth in the Compensation Committee Charter.
Compensation Committee meetings are regularly attended by the Chief Executive Officer.
At the beginning of 2009, the Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Enloe, Emanuel and Shapiro. In January 2010, Mr. Emanuel stepped down from the Compensation Committee and Messrs. Carleton and Dolgen were appointed to the Compensation Committee.
Board Structure
The Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into in connection with the merger, or the Merger Agreement, provided that upon completion of the merger, subject to the fiduciary duties of the board of directors, the board of directors would initially be made up of 14 directors, with seven individuals designated by Live Nation and seven individuals designated by Ticketmaster, including up to two directors designated by Liberty Media Corporation and certain of its affiliates, which are collectively referred to as Liberty. The Merger Agreement also provided that each Board committee would consist of four directors, with two individuals designated by Live Nation and two individuals by Ticketmaster, including one director designated by Liberty to serve on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee (the Audit Committee currently has one vacancy as Ticketmaster had declined to appoint one of its two designees). The Liberty Stockholder Agreement entered into in connection with the merger, or the Liberty Stockholder Agreement, provides that Liberty is entitled to nominate up to two directors for election to the board of directors and that a director nominated by Liberty will serve on the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee so long as certain stock ownership levels are met. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and the Liberty Stockholder Agreement, and with respect to Mr. Azoff, his existing employment agreement, upon completion of the merger, Messrs. Azoff, Diller, Dolgen, Kaufman and Miller were appointed to the board of directors by Ticketmaster and Messrs. Carleton and Malone were appointed to the board of directors by Ticketmaster at the behest of Liberty.
Corporate Governance
We are committed to maintaining high standards of business conduct and corporate governance, which we believe are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders well and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers and employees and Board of Directors Governance Guidelines, which, in conjunction with our certificate of incorporation, bylaws and board committee charters, form our framework for governance. All of these documents are publicly available on our website atwww.livenation.com/investors or may be obtained upon written request to:
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
9348 Civic Center Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Attention: General Counsel
Board Composition and Director Qualifications
Our Nominating and Governance Committee periodically assesses the appropriate size and composition of the board of directors, taking into account our specific needs. The committee utilizes various methods for identifying and evaluating candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the committee through recommendations of directors, management, stockholders and professional search firms. Generally, the committee seeks members with diverse backgrounds and viewpoints which contribute to the board of directors’ broad spectrum of experience and expertise, and who have a reputation of integrity. While the Nominating and Governance Committee carefully considers diversity when considering director candidates, it has not established a formal policy regarding diversity.
At a minimum, directors should:
have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility;
demonstrate strong leadership skills;
have the time, energy, interest and willingness to serve as a director; and
contribute to the mix of skills, core competencies and qualifications of the board of directors and management.
In addition to recommendations from directors, management and professional search firms, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider director candidates properly submitted by stockholders. Stockholder recommendations should be sent to the General Counsel at our principal executive offices. The Nominating and Governance Committee will review all potential director nominees in the same manner, regardless of the source of the recommendation, in accordance with its charter.
Board Leadership Structure
The board of directors believes that separate individuals should hold the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and our board of directors is currently led by a non-employee Chairman. Under our bylaws and Board of Directors Governance Guidelines, the Chairman of the Board is responsible for coordinating the board of directors’ activities, including the scheduling of meetings and the determination of relevant agenda items. The board of directors believes this leadership structure has enhanced the board of directors’ oversight of and independence from our management, the ability of the board of directors to carry out its roles and responsibilities on behalf of our stockholders and our overall corporate governance.
Risk Oversight and Compensation Risk Assessment
The Audit Committee reviews our policies and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including discussing with management our major risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Audit Committee reports the results of its review to the board of directors.
Matters of risk management are brought to the attention of the Audit Committee by our Chief Financial Officer, our General Counsel, our Chief Accounting Officer and our Director of Internal Audit, who regularly reviews and assesses internal processes and controls for ongoing compliance with internal policies, as well as for potential weaknesses that could result in a failure of an internal control process. Management reviews and reports on potential areas of risk at the request of the Audit Committee or other members of the board of directors.
We believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended significant risk to the company as a whole. We also believe that our incentive compensation arrangements provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the company’s ability to effectively identify and manage significant risks, are compatible with effective internal controls and our risk management practices and are supported by the oversight and administration of the Compensation Committee with regard to executive compensation programs.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, which is a “code of ethics” as defined by applicable SEC rules. The purpose and role of this code is to, among other things, focus our directors, officers and employees on areas of ethical risk, provide guidance to help them recognize and deal with ethical issues, provide mechanisms to report unethical or unlawful conduct and to help enhance and formalize our culture of integrity, honesty and accountability. If we make any amendments to this code, other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from any provision of this code that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller, or persons performing similar functions, and that relates to an element of the SEC’s “code of ethics” definition, then we will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website atwww.livenation.com/investors.
Officer and Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
It is the board of directors’ policy that all directors and executive officers, consistent with their responsibilities to our stockholders as a whole, hold a significant equity interest in our company. Toward this end, the board of directors expects all directors and executive officers to own, or acquire within three years of first becoming a director or executive officer, shares of our common stock having a market value of at least $100,000.
The board of directors recognizes that exceptions to this policy may be necessary or appropriate in individual cases and may approve such exceptions from time to time as it deems appropriate in the interest of our stockholders.
Stockholder Communications
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the board of directors, any committee thereof, the independent or non-management directors as a group or any individual director in writing. All such written communications must identify the recipient and be forwarded by mail to:
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
9348 Civic Center Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210
Attention: General Counsel
The General Counsel will act as agent for the directors in facilitating such communications. In that capacity, the General Counsel may review, sort and summarize the communications.
Complaints about accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters may be made by calling our toll-free Business Integrity Hotline at (866) 458-6475, or via e-mail addressed toBusinessIntegrity@LiveNation.com.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. These reporting persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of the Section 16(a) forms received by us, or written representations from reporting persons that no such forms were required to be filed, as applicable, we believe that the reporting persons complied with all of the Section 16(a) filing requirements during the 2009 fiscal year.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis may contain statements regarding historical and/or future individual and company performance measures, targets and other goals. These goals are disclosed in the limited context of our executive compensation program and should not be understood to be statements of management’s or the board of directors’ expectations or estimates of results or other guidance. We specifically caution investors not to apply these statements to other contexts.
Roles and Responsibilities
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program as it relates to the following “named executive officers” for fiscal 2009:
Michael Rapino | President and Chief Executive Officer | |
Jason Garner | Chief Executive Officer—Global Music | |
Alan Ridgeway | Chief Executive Officer—International Music | |
Michael Rowles | General Counsel | |
Kathy Willard | Chief Financial Officer |
The Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for establishing the compensation of our named executive officers. The Compensation Committee is appointed by the board of directors, and consists entirely of directors who are “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and “non-employee” directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Carlton, Dolgen, Enloe and Shapiro, but during 2009, the period primarily discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, consisted of Messrs. Enloe, Emanuel and Shapiro. The Compensation Committee is responsible for (i) administering and overseeing our executive compensation program, including matters related to salary, bonus plans and stock compensation plans, and (ii) approving all grants of equity awards (although subsequent to its acquisition as part of the merger, compensation paid by Front Line, and equity awards with respect to Front Line common stock, must also be approved by the board of directors of Front Line). Mr. Dolgen is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain talented individuals who are essential to our continued success. In determining the form and amount of compensation payable to our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee is guided by the following objectives and principles:
Compensation should tie to performance. We aim to foster a pay-for-performance culture, with a substantial amount of executive compensation “at risk.” Accordingly, a significant portion of total compensation is tied to and varies with our financial, operational and strategic performance, as well as individual performance.
Compensation should encourage and reward the achievement of specific corporate and departmental goals and initiatives. From time to time, we set specific corporate and/or departmental goals and initiatives pertaining to, among other things, growth, productivity and people. Currently, we are primarily emphasizing, and the executive compensation program is designed primarily to reward, (i) growth in operating income before certain unusual and/or non-cash charges, acquisition transaction expenses, depreciation and amortization (including impairments), loss or gain on sale of operating assets and non-cash compensation expense, and including any pro forma adjustments in respect of acquisitions or divestitures and evaluated on a constant currency basis, which is referred to as “Adjusted Operating Income” and (ii) the achievement of various personal performance objectives.
Compensation should establish common goals for executives and their key reports. We endeavor to set consistent performance targets for multiple layers of executives. By establishing common goals, we encourage a coordinated approach to managing the company that we believe will be most likely to increase stockholder value in the long term.
Compensation should align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Equity-based compensation encourages executives to focus on our long-term growth and prospects and to manage the company from the perspective of our stockholders.
Within this framework, we strive to maintain executive compensation levels that are fair, reasonable and competitive.
Compensation Setting Process
Compensation determinations made during 2009 affecting our named executive officers were based primarily on the Compensation Committee’s assessments of the appropriate levels of compensation required to recruit and retain top-level executive talent, based on industry standards and input from our Chief Executive Officer with respect to our other named executive officers, as well as the Compensation Committee’s review of what we had paid executives in such roles historically. The Compensation Committee did not work with any compensation consultants during 2009.
The Compensation Committee approves all material compensation decisions for the named executive officers, including the grant of all equity awards. Michael Rapino, our President and Chief Executive Officer, annually reviews the named executive officers’ performance, other than his own performance, which is reviewed by the Compensation Committee. The results of these evaluations, including recommendations on any salary adjustments, cash bonus amounts, performance targets and/or equity awards, are presented by Mr. Rapino to the Compensation Committee for consideration and approval. Mr. Rapino regularly attends meetings of the Compensation Committee and, upon the committee’s request, provides various compensation and performance information to the committee. The Compensation Committee also meets in executive session without Mr. Rapino to discuss compensation matters pertaining to Mr. Rapino. On occasion, other named executive officers and members of management meet with the Compensation Committee to provide performance and other relevant data to the committee.
The Compensation Committee recognizes that, in certain circumstances, it is appropriate to enter into written compensatory agreements with key executives to provide greater stability and certainty that permits the executives to remain focused on their duties and responsibilities and better promote the interests of our stockholders. We have entered into an employment agreement with each of our named executive officers. The employment agreements generally set forth information regarding base salary, cash performance awards, equity incentive awards, severance benefits and change-in-control vesting, as well as other employee benefits.
Certain named executive officers are entitled to accelerated vesting of their equity awards upon the occurrence of a change of control, which is referred to as a single trigger, to ensure that these executives receive the full benefit of their long-term compensation in a manner consistent with benefits realized by our stockholders. None of our named executive officers other than Mr. Rapino is eligible to receive severance or comparable cash payments upon the occurrence of a change of control, absent a qualifying termination, which is referred to as a double trigger, because the severance benefits contained in the employment agreements are intended to provide protection in connection with the loss of employment (including a loss of employment related to a corporate transaction) rather than merely incentivize the closing of a transaction. In April 2009, we entered into an amendment to Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement that provided Mr. Rapino with a cash payment upon the closing of the merger with Ticketmaster in order to separately reward Mr. Rapino for his extraordinary efforts in connection with this transaction. In October 2009, we entered into an employment agreement that became effective upon the closing of the merger, superseding his existing employment. For further discussion of the employment agreements of our named executive officers, see “Employment Agreements” below.
Compensation Program Components
Our executive compensation program consists of the following components:
base salary;
cash performance bonuses;
long-term equity incentive awards; and
employee benefits and other perquisites.
The Compensation Committee believes that these components function together to provide a strong compensation program that enables us to attract and retain top talent while simultaneously aligning the interests of our officers with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee has not adopted a formal policy or practice for the allocation of (i) base salary versus incentive compensation, (ii) cash bonuses versus equity compensation or (iii) equity grants amongst various award types. Rather, the committee seeks to flexibly tailor each executive’s total compensation package to include these various components in a manner designed to motivate and retain most effectively that particular executive, while still aligning the executive’s interests with those of our stockholders. For these reasons, the Compensation Committee has not relied on formal benchmarking or peer group analysis in determining our compensation programs, though industry standards and informal reviews of compensation paid to executives of our competitors are taken into consideration in this process.
Base Salary
The Compensation Committee believes that competitive levels of cash compensation, together with equity and other long-term incentive programs, are necessary for the motivation and retention of executive officers. Base salaries provide executives with a predictable level of monthly income and help achieve the compensation program’s objectives by attracting and retaining strong talent. The employment agreements set the base salaries of the named executive officers, with annual adjustments, if any, being made by the Compensation Committee in its discretion (unless such annual adjustments are provided generally to all employees in accordance with company policy). In some cases, the agreements provide for minimum annual increases in an executive’s base salary to provide additional retention incentive to these executives.
Base salaries for executive officers are typically established at the time the employment agreements are entered into or amended and are based on negotiations with the executives and on the Compensation Committee’s assessments of the salaries necessary and appropriate to recruit and/or retain the individual executives for their particular positions. These assessments include informal reviews of compensation paid to executives of comparable companies and competitors of ours. In establishing the base salaries of our executive officers, the members of the Compensation Committee also bring to bear their own judgment of appropriate compensation based on their individual professional experiences.
For further discussion of the base salaries of the named executive officers, see “Employment Agreements” below.
Cash Performance Bonuses
Annual cash bonus eligibility is provided to each of the named executive officers to reward the achievement of corporate, departmental and/or individual accomplishments and to tie compensation to performance, each in keeping with our compensation philosophy. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee reviewed the named executive officers’ performance during 2009 and awarded cash performance bonuses to each of the named executive officers based primarily on the achievement of Adjusted Operating Income (both corporate and, where applicable, divisional). In general, annual cash bonus eligibility for the named executive officers’ key reports was also based on Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis in order to encourage a coordinated approach to managing the company in keeping with our compensation philosophy.
We believe that Adjusted Operating Income is the primary metric on which the company’s performance is evaluated by financial analysts and the investment community generally. Internally, we review Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis to evaluate the performance of our operating segments, and believe that this metric assists investors by allowing them to evaluate changes in the operating results of our businesses separate from non-operational factors that affect net income, thus providing insights into both operations and the other factors that affect reported results.
In January 2010, each named executive officer was awarded a cash performance bonus in respect of performance in 2009 as follows:
Michael Rapino.Mr. Rapino’s cash bonus eligibility for 2009 was based primarily on the achievement of company Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a target cash performance bonus of $1,500,000 for Mr. Rapino, based on the achievement of $190 million of company Adjusted Operating Income for the year. Also in March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a target cash exceptional performance bonus of a further $1,500,000 for Mr. Rapino based on the achievement of the following performance targets: 50% based on the achievement of exceptional company Adjusted Operating Income results for the year, with each $1 million of Adjusted Operating Income above $190 million representing 5% of the target up to a maximum of 50%; 25% based on the achievement of $120 million of company sponsorship Adjusted Operating Income; and 25% based on the generation of at least $75 million of additional liquidity for the company during the year.
In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis, the company had achieved 109% of its company Adjusted Operating Income performance target. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Rapino his full targeted cash performance bonus of $1,500,000. It also determined that, on a pro forma basis: company Adjusted Operating Income was more than $10 million more than the target, resulting in payment of 50% of his target exceptional performance bonus ($750,000); the company had missed the sponsorship Adjusted Operating Income target; and the company had generated more than $75 million in additional liquidity, primarily through the sale of its U.K. theater business, resulting in payment of a further 25% of the target exceptional performance bonus ($375,000). As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Rapino cash performance bonuses totaling $2,625,000 for 2009.
Jason Garner. Mr. Garner’s cash bonus eligibility for 2009 was based on the achievement of Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis, for the company as a whole, as well as for the company’s North American Music, International Music and sponsorship businesses. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a target bonus of $1,700,000 for Mr. Garner, based on the achievement of the following performance targets: 16.67% (one-sixth) based on the achievement of $190 million
of company Adjusted Operating Income for the year; 16.67% based on the achievement of $104 million of North American Music Adjusted Operating Income; 16.67% based on the achievement of $102 million of International Music Adjusted Operating Income; 25% based on the achievement of exceptional Global Music (North American Music and International Music combined) Adjusted Operating Income results for the year, with each $1 million of Adjusted Operating Income above $206 million representing 2.5% of the target bonus up to a maximum of 25%; and 25% based on the achievement of $120 million of company sponsorship Adjusted Operating Income.
In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis: the company had achieved 109% of the company Adjusted Operating Income target, resulting in payment of 16.67% of the target bonus ($283,333); the company had achieved 101% of the North American Music Adjusted Operating Income target and 114% of the International Music Adjusted Operating income target for the year, with the combined Global Music results representing more than $10 million in excess of the target, resulting in payment of a further 58.33% of the target bonus ($991,667); and the company had missed the sponsorship Adjusted Operating Income target. As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Garner a total cash performance bonus of $1,275,000 for 2009. Of that amount, $1,000,000 was offset against the retention bonus granted to Mr. Garner upon the execution of an amendment to his employment agreement in April 2009, and the remaining $275,000 was paid in cash.
Alan Ridgeway. Mr. Ridgeway’s cash bonus eligibility for 2009 was based on the achievement of International Music Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a target bonus for Mr. Ridgeway of $399,238 (converted from British Pound Sterling), based on the achievement of $103 million of International Music Adjusted Operating Income for the year, exclusive of certain allocations for Global Music operations. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis, the International Music division had achieved 113% of its performance target. As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Ridgeway his full targeted cash performance bonus of $399,238 for 2009, all of which was offset against the remainder of the $1,000,000 retention bonus granted to Mr. Ridgeway upon the execution of an amendment to his then-current employment agreement in August 2006.
Michael Rowles. Mr. Rowles’ cash bonus eligibility for 2009 was based on the achievement of company Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a performance target for Mr. Rowles of $190 million of company Adjusted Operating Income for the year and a target bonus of $550,000. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis, the company had achieved 109% of its performance target. As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Rowles his full targeted cash performance bonus of $550,000 for 2009.
Kathy Willard. Ms. Willard’s cash bonus eligibility for 2009 was based on the achievement of company Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis. In March 2009, the Compensation Committee set a performance target for Ms. Willard of $190 million of company Adjusted Operating Income for the year and a target bonus of $600,000. In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis, the company had achieved 109% of its performance target. As a result, the Compensation Committee awarded Ms. Willard her full targeted cash performance bonus of $600,000 for 2009.
For further discussion of the named executive officers’ cash performance bonuses, see “—2009 Summary Compensation Table” and “—Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.”
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards
From time to time, we grant long-term equity incentive awards to the named executive officers in an effort to reward long-term performance, to promote retention, to allow them to participate in our long-term growth and profitability and to align their interests with those of our stockholders, each in keeping with our compensation philosophy. All long-term equity awards to named executive officers have been granted under our Stock Incentive Plan and approved by either the Compensation Committee or the board of directors.
The Compensation Committee and the board of directors administer the Stock Incentive Plan, including selecting award recipients, setting the exercise price, if any, of awards, fixing all other terms and conditions of awards and interpreting the provisions of the Stock Incentive Plan. The following equity awards, among others, may be granted under the Stock Incentive Plan:
stock options;
restricted stock;
deferred stock;
stock appreciation rights; and
performance-based cash and equity awards.
Two named executive officers received long-term equity awards during 2009, as follows:
Michael Rapino. On March 17, 2009, Mr. Rapino was granted 2,000,000 stock options with an exercise price of $2.75, in connection with the anticipated amendment to Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement. On March 17, 2009, the Compensation Committee also granted to Mr. Rapino a restricted stock award of an aggregate of 150,000 shares. That award was made pursuant to Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement and was comprised of two separate grants:
100,000 restricted shares, which were to vest 50% on March 31, 2010 upon the achievement of $190 million of company Adjusted Operating Income on a pro forma basis for 2009 and, if such target was achieved, the remaining 50% on March 31, 2011, subject to Mr. Rapino’s continued employment. If the financial performance target was missed, a percentage of the shares (up to 100%) were to have been forfeited in accordance with a sliding scale based on actual company Adjusted Operating Income achievement.
In January 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that, on a pro forma basis, the Adjusted Operating Income target had been achieved. In connection with the closing of the merger later in January 2010, these restricted shares accelerated and the restrictions lapsed, in accordance with the terms of Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement.
50,000 restricted shares, which were to vest in connection with the closing of the merger. If the merger had failed to close, the shares were to have been forfeited in their entirety. In connection with the closing of the merger in January 2010, these restricted shares accelerated and the restrictions lapsed, in accordance with the terms of Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement.
Jason Garner. On March 17, 2009, Mr. Garner was granted 300,000 stock options with an exercise price of $2.75, in connection with the anticipated amendment to Mr. Garner’s employment agreement. The number of stock options granted was determined based on the recommendation of Mr. Rapino.
Timing of Equity Grants
In March 2007, the Compensation Committee adopted guidelines regarding the timing of equity award grants to help ensure compliance with applicable securities regulations and facilitate the administration of our stock incentive plan. Under those guidelines, the Compensation Committee generally (i) grants annual long-term equity awards to our employees, including our named executive officers, in approximately the first quarter of each calendar year, usually in connection with the first meeting of the board of directors in such year, and (ii) grants additional awards, if any, to new hires or other key employees as appropriate on a quarterly basis, generally during the two weeks following the release of our financial results for the prior fiscal quarter. The Compensation Committee may nevertheless elect to make equity awards at other times as it deems necessary or appropriate, and did so once during 2009. In the event that material non-public information becomes known to the Compensation Committee prior to granting an equity award, the Compensation Committee will take the existence of such information under advisement and make an assessment in its business judgment whether to delay the grant of the equity award in order to avoid any impropriety. For a discussion of share ownership guidelines applicable to our named executive officers, see “Officer and Director Stock Ownership Guidelines” above.
Employee Benefits and Other Perquisites
The named executive officers are eligible to participate in our Group Benefits Plan, which is generally available to all full-time employees and which includes medical, vision, dental, company-paid life and accidental death or dismemberment, supplemental life and accidental death or dismemberment and short- and long-term disability insurance, flexible spending accounts (health and dependent care) and an employee assistance program. Additionally, our employees are entitled to paid vacation, sick leave and other paid holidays. The Compensation Committee believes that our commitment to provide the above benefits recognizes that the health and well-being of our employees contribute directly to a productive and successful work life that enhances results for us and our stockholders.
In addition to the employee benefits discussed above, the named executive officers receive certain perquisites, as appropriate to their particular circumstances, which are not generally available to all our employees. In 2009:
Mr. Rapino received an automobile allowance and a reimbursement for the tax expense associated with that allowance, both pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, a medical physical exam and a reimbursement for the tax expense associated with the exam as well as a complimentary membership to the House of Blues Foundation Room.
Mr. Ridgeway received a company contribution towards a United Kingdom retirement plan and a complimentary membership to the House of Blues Foundation Room.
Messrs. Garner and Rowles and Ms. Willard did not receive perquisites aggregating to more than $10,000 during 2009.
We are a live entertainment company, and from time to time our directors and certain employees, including the named executive officers, receive complimentary tickets to live events that are produced and/or promoted by us. Regular attendance at our events is integrally and directly related to the performance of the named executive officers’ duties, and we therefore do not consider their receipt of these tickets, or reimbursement for associated travel or other related expenses, to constitute a perquisite. To the extent the named executive officers are accompanied to such events by family or friends, however, the incremental costs to us associated with those guests’ attendance are deemed to be perquisites.
From time to time, the Compensation Committee reviews its perquisite program to determine if any adjustments are appropriate. For further discussion of the above perquisites, see “—2009 Summary Compensation Table.”
Stock Bonus Plan
Our named executive officers, employees, consultants and non-employee directors are eligible to participate in the Live Nation Stock Bonus Plan, which was adopted by the Compensation Committee in March 2008, amended by the Compensation Committee in February 2009 and amended and restated by the Compensation Committee in January 2010. The Stock Bonus Plan authorizes us to issue shares of our common stock in lieu of payment of a cash bonus and/or director fees, as applicable, which a participant is entitled to receive under any bonus or compensation plan or agreement maintained by us or any of our subsidiaries if the participant so elects. The Compensation Committee has the exclusive authority to administer the Stock Bonus Plan, including the power to select to whom an election to receive shares of our common stock in payment of a cash bonus is to be extended and to determine the terms and conditions of such issuance. The number of shares of our common stock to be issued in payment of any cash bonus under the Stock Bonus Plan is equal to the amount of the cash bonus divided by the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date that the cash bonus would otherwise be payable in cash. We believe that making the Stock Bonus Plan available to certain officers and other employees encourages them to make more significant investments in our stock and further align their interests with those of our stockholders, in keeping with our compensation philosophy. None of our named executive officers or non-employee directors participated in the Stock Bonus Plan in 2009.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
We maintain a nonqualified deferred compensation plan under which named executive officers, directors and other designated management employees were able to defer a portion of their annual compensation, including, as applicable, salary, director fees, commissions and bonuses. By participating in this plan, named executive officers were able to delay taxes on both deferred amounts and earnings on those amounts, and were also eligible to receive matching contributions on deferrals from the company. The plan was frozen to additional participation beginning January 2010. For a description of the terms of our nonqualified deferred compensation plan, see “—2009 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below.
401(k) Savings Plan
We maintain a 401(k) Savings Plan for all U.S.-based employees, including the named executive officers, as a source of retirement income. Generally, our full-time employees that are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the plan immediately upon hire, and our part-time, seasonal and temporary employees that are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the plan upon completing one year of service and a minimum of 1,000 hours of service. Fidelity Investments is the independent plan trustee. As of December 31, 2009, participants had the ability to direct contributions into specified mutual funds within the Fidelity family of funds, as well as other outside investment vehicles. Currently, our common stock is not an investment option under the plan. Although we are not currently making matching contributions under the 401(k) Savings Plan, we have made matching contributions in the past and may make matching contributions in the future. Matching contributions, if any, vest 50% after the employee’s second full year of service and 100% after the third full year of service, after which all matching contributions are fully vested at the time they are made. We believe that offering our named executive officers this additional vehicle for saving and generating earnings on their savings in a tax-deferred manner provides a valuable benefit that helps us to retain top talent.
For further discussion of the named executive officers’ participation in the 401(k) Savings Plan, see “—2009 Summary Compensation Table.”
Tax and Accounting Considerations
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, places a limit of $1 million on the amount of compensation we may deduct for federal income tax purposes in any one year with respect to our Chief Executive Officer and the next three most highly compensated officers, other than our Chief Financial Officer, which are referred to as the Covered Persons. However, performance-based compensation that meets certain requirements may be excluded from this $1 million limitation.
In reviewing the effectiveness of our executive compensation program and determining whether to structure our compensation to avoid the imposition of this $1 million deduction limitation, the Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to us and to the Covered Persons of various payments and benefits. However, the deductibility of certain compensation payments depends, in part, upon the timing of an executive’s exercise of previously granted awards, as well as other factors that may be beyond the Compensation Committee’s control. While the tax impact of any compensation arrangement is one factor to be considered in determining appropriate compensation, such impact is evaluated in light of the Compensation Committee’s overall compensation philosophy and objectives. For these and other reasons, including preservation of flexibility in compensating the named executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the Compensation Committee did not, during 2009, limit executive compensation to that which is deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be structured in this manner.
The Compensation Committee does consider various alternatives designed to preserve the deductibility of compensation and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable and to the extent consistent with our other compensation objectives, including the objective of retaining the discretion it deems necessary to compensate officers in a manner commensurate with performance and the competitive environment for executive talent. Going forward, we may establish annual performance criteria under our Amended and Restated 2006 Annual Incentive Plan and/or our Stock Incentive Plan in an effort to ensure deductibility of certain of our named executive officers’ incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee may, however, continue to award compensation which may not be fully deductible if it determines that such compensation is consistent with our philosophy and is in our and our stockholders’ best interests.
The Compensation Committee also endeavors to structure executive officers’ compensation in a manner that is either compliant with, or exempt from the application of, Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, which provisions may impose significant additional taxes on non-conforming, nonqualified deferred compensation (including certain equity awards, severance, incentive compensation, traditional deferred compensation and other payments). Again, the tax impact of any compensation arrangement is one factor to be considered in determining appropriate compensation, and such impact is evaluated in light of the Compensation Committee’s overall compensation philosophy and objectives.
Accounting Considerations
The Compensation Committee regularly considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to equity compensation awards. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives, but will consider any changes in light of our overall compensation philosophy.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of the named executive officers. Among other things, these agreements provide for certain payments upon a change in control or termination of employment. The principal elements of these employment agreements are summarized below:
Michael Rapino
In October 2007, we entered into, and in December 2008 and April 2009, we amended, an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Rapino, or the 2007 Rapino Agreement, under which Mr. Rapino served as our President and Chief Executive Officer. The amended term of the 2007 Rapino Agreement began effective as of January 1, 2009 and ended upon completion of the merger. In October 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Rapino that became effective upon completion of the merger under which Mr. Rapino serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors for as long as he remains an officer of the company. The term of the agreement ends on May 31, 2014. During 2009, Mr. Rapino received compensation and benefits in the tables below pursuant to the 2007 Rapino Agreement. This summary describes the terms of Mr. Rapino’s employment agreement as it is currently in effect following completion of the merger. The annual bonus and termination provisions in Mr. Rapino’s existing employment agreement are substantially similar to those in the 2007 Rapino Agreement.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rapino receives a base salary of $2.0 million per year beginning on January 25, 2010, the closing date of the merger, and is entitled to receive minimum increases in base salary of $100,000 per year on each anniversary of this date. Following transition from bonus commitments under the 2007 Rapino Agreement, Mr. Rapino will be eligible to receive (a) an annual cash performance bonus with a target amount equal to 100% of his highest base salary paid during the calendar year in which the bonus was earned, (b) an annual cash exceptional performance bonus with a target amount equal to an additional 100% of his highest base salary paid during the calendar year in which the bonus was earned (each subject to increases or decreases based on actual performance, determined by reference to the achievement of
performance targets established by the Compensation Committee) and (c) annual grants of 150,000 shares of restricted stock, vesting upon the attainment of specified financial and individual performance criteria set by the Compensation Committee in equal installments on March 31st of the first two calendar years following the applicable date of grant, subject to Mr. Rapino’s continued employment with Live Nation.
Upon completion of the merger, Mr. Rapino received (a) a $3.0 million cash bonus and (b) a grant of 350,000 shares of restricted stock, or the Rapino Restricted Stock Grant, vesting (i) in equal installments on each of the first four anniversaries of the closing date of the merger or (ii) with respect to each installment, if later than the applicable vesting anniversary, the first date on which the average closing trading price of our common stock over any consecutive 12-month period exceeds $20 per share. Upon completion of the merger, all unvested Live Nation equity awards then held by Mr. Rapino, other than an option granted to Mr. Rapino in March 2009 to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock, or the Rapino Option Grant, vested in full.
Under the employment agreement, upon the occurrence of a “change in control” of Live Nation, all unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Rapino, including the Rapino Restricted Stock Grant and the Rapino Option Grant, will vest and become immediately exercisable (if applicable). In addition, in the event that an excise tax is imposed as a result of any payments made to Mr. Rapino in connection with a change in control of Live Nation, we will pay to or on behalf of Mr. Rapino an amount equal to such excise taxes plus any taxes resulting from such payment. Mr. Rapino is also entitled to receive an annual car allowance, grossed up for applicable taxes.
The employment agreement (i) will terminate upon Mr. Rapino’s death, (ii) may be terminated by us upon Mr. Rapino’s disability, (iii) may be terminated by us at any time (a) without “cause” (as defined below) or (b) for “cause,” subject to Mr. Rapino’s right in some cases to cure and provided that at least a majority of the board of directors must first determine that “cause” exists and (iv) may be terminated by Mr. Rapino at any time (a) without “good reason” (as defined below) or (b) with “good reason,” subject in some cases to our right to cure.
If Mr. Rapino’s employment is terminated by us for “cause,” by Mr. Rapino without “good reason” or due to Mr. Rapino’s death or disability, he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid;
accrued and unused vacation pay; and
unreimbursed expenses.
If Mr. Rapino’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by Mr. Rapino for “good reason,” he is entitled to:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses; and
subject to Mr. Rapino signing a general release of claims,
a cash payment equal to (i) the sum of Mr. Rapino’s base salary, the performance bonus paid to Mr. Rapino for the year prior to the year in which the termination occurs and the exceptional performance bonus paid to Mr. Rapino for the year prior to the year in which the termination occurs, multiplied by (ii) the greater of the remainder of the employment term or three years;
up to $16,667 per year for up to three years of continued medical insurance coverage for Mr. Rapino and his dependents; and
immediate acceleration of the vesting of all unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Rapino.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “cause” means: (i) Mr. Rapino’s willful and continued failure to perform his material duties; (ii) the willful or intentional engaging by Mr. Rapino in material misconduct that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise, to us; (iii) Mr. Rapino’s conviction of, or a plea of nolo contendere to, a crime constituting (a) a felony under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or (b) a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude that
causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise, to us; (iv) Mr. Rapino’s committing or engaging in any act of fraud, embezzlement, theft or other act of dishonesty against us that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise to us; or (v) Mr. Rapino’s breach of the restrictive covenants included in the employment agreement that causes material and demonstrable injury, monetarily or otherwise, to us.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as: (i) reduction in Mr. Rapino’s base salary or annual incentive compensation opportunity, or the failure by us to grant the restricted shares required to be granted to Mr. Rapino under the employment agreement; (ii) a breach by us of a material provision of the employment agreement; (iii) failure to re-nominate Mr. Rapino to our board of directors; (iv) us requiring Mr. Rapino to report to anyone other than the board of directors; (v) a substantial diminution in Mr. Rapino’s duties or responsibilities or a change in his title; (vi) a transfer of Mr. Rapino’s primary workplace away from Los Angeles; or (vii) a change in control, except that Mr. Rapino may not invoke a “good reason” termination solely as a result of a change of control until 180 days after the change in control.
The employment agreement also contains non-disclosure, non-solicitation and indemnification provisions.
Jason Garner
In March 2008, we entered into, and in December 2008 and April 2009, we amended, an employment agreement with Mr. Garner under which Mr. Garner serves as Chief Executive Officer, Global Music. Prior to the April 2009 amendment, Mr. Garner served as Chief Executive Officer of our North American Music division. As amended, the term of the employment agreement began effective as of March 1, 2009 and ends on February 28, 2013. This summary describes the terms of Mr. Garner’s employment agreement as it is currently in effect based on the April 2009 amendment.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Garner receives a base salary of $850,000 per year beginning on March 1, 2009, and is entitled to receive minimum increases in base salary of $50,000 per year on March 1 of each of 2010-2012. Beginning in 2009, Mr. Garner is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus of up to 200% of his then-current base salary, based upon the achievement of performance targets established annually by us.
Upon signing the employment agreement as amended in April 2009, Mr. Garner received $250,000 as a signing bonus and received $1.0 million as a retention bonus, which will be offset against any performance bonuses subsequently earned by Mr. Garner under the employment agreement. If Mr. Garner remains employed with us as of February 28, 2013, any remaining retention bonus that has not been so offset will be deemed earned by Mr. Garner. If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated earlier, any remaining unearned portion of the retention bonus will be (i) repayable to us if Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” (as defined below) or by Mr. Garner without “good reason” (as defined below) or (ii) deemed earned by Mr. Garner if his employment is terminated by us without cause, by Mr. Garner with “good reason” or due to Mr. Garner’s death or disability.
The employment agreement (i) will terminate upon Mr. Garner’s death, (ii) may be terminated by us upon Mr. Garner’s disability, (iii) may be terminated by us at any time (a) without “cause” or (b) for “cause,” subject to Mr. Garner’s right in some cases to cure, and (iv) may be terminated by Mr. Garner at any time (a) without “good reason” or (b) with “good reason,” subject to our right to cure.
If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated due to Mr. Garner’s death or disability or due to the expiration of the term of the employment agreement, he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, if any;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses; and
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan.
If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated by us for “cause,” he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses; and
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan.
If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by Mr. Garner for “good reason,” he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, if any;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan; and
subject to Mr. Garner signing a general release of claims, a lump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of his then-current base salary, as well as the immediate acceleration of vesting of all equity awards granted to Mr. Garner prior to the date of termination.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “cause” means: (i) Mr. Garner’s continued non-performance of his duties under the employment agreement; (ii) Mr. Garner’s refusal or failure to follow lawful directives; (iii) a criminal or civil conviction of Mr. Garner, a plea of nolo contendere by Mr. Garner or other conduct by Mr. Garner that has resulted in, or would reasonably be expected to result in, material injury to our reputation, including conviction of fraud, theft, embezzlement or a crime involving moral turpitude; (iv) a breach by Mr. Garner of any provision of the employment agreement; (v) conduct by Mr. Garner constituting a material act of misconduct in connection with the performance of his duties, including violation of our policy on sexual harassment or misappropriation of our funds or property; or (vi) a violation by Mr. Garner of our employment policies, including those set forth in our Employee Handbook or our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as: (i) a repeated failure by us to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; (ii) a substantial and unusual increase in Mr. Garner’s duties and responsibilities without an offer of additional reasonable compensation; or (iii) a substantial and unusual reduction in Mr. Garner’s duties and responsibilities.
The employment agreement also contains non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition provisions.
Alan Ridgeway
In September 2007, we entered into a new employment agreement with Alan Ridgeway to serve as Chief Executive Officer of our International Music division. Mr. Ridgeway previously served as our Chief Financial Officer. The initial term of the employment agreement ends on December 31, 2010. After that date, the agreement will renew automatically day-to-day such that the term of the agreement will always remain at exactly one year, unless earlier terminated.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Ridgeway receives a base salary of £300,000 per year and will be entitled to annual increases of five percent during each year of the term beginning on January 1, 2009. In March 2009, in connection with a realignment of salaries within the company’s International Music division, Mr. Ridgeway’s base salary was increased from £315,000 to £375,000 effective February 1, 2009. Mr. Ridgeway is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus of (i) $300,000 for 2007 and (ii) 65% of his annual base salary for each year beginning in 2008, in each case to be paid in a combination of cash, stock options and/or restricted stock, on terms and conditions to be set and determined in writing by us for each calendar year. We also agreed to reimburse Mr. Ridgeway for all reasonable expenses related to his relocation from Los Angeles to the United Kingdom.
In August 2006, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to Mr. Ridgeway’s then-current employment agreement which remains in effect under his current employment agreement. Pursuant to that amendment, we paid Mr. Ridgeway a retention bonus of $1 million, which will be offset against any future performance bonuses earned by Mr. Ridgeway. If Mr. Ridgeway is still employed by us as of December 31, 2010, the remaining amount of the retention bonus, if any, will be deemed earned by Mr. Ridgeway. Prior to that date, if Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” (as defined below) or by Mr. Ridgeway without “good reason” (as defined below), Mr. Ridgeway must repay any unearned portion of the retention bonus. If Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated by us without “cause,” or by death or disability, or by Mr. Ridgeway for “good reason” prior to December 31, 2010, the remaining amount of the retention bonus, if any, will be deemed earned by Mr. Ridgeway.
The employment agreement (i) will terminate upon Mr. Ridgeway’s death, (ii) may be terminated by us upon Mr. Ridgeway’s disability, (iii) may be terminated by us at any time (a) without “cause” or (b) for “cause,” subject to Mr. Ridgeway’s right in some cases to cure, and (iv) may be terminated by Mr. Ridgeway at any time (a) without “good reason” or (b) with “good reason,” subject to our right to cure.
If Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated due to Mr. Ridgeway’s death or disability, he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, if any;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses; and
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan.
If Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated by us for “cause,” he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses; and
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan.
If Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” or by Mr. Ridgeway for “good reason,” he is entitled to receive (in a lump-sum payment):
accrued and unpaid base salary;
a prorated performance bonus, if any;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan; and
subject to Mr. Ridgeway signing a general release of claims, an amount equal to Mr. Ridgeway’s monthly base salary for the greater of 12 months or the remainder of the term of the employment agreement.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “cause” means: (i) Mr. Ridgeway’s continued non-performance of his duties under the employment agreement; (ii) Mr. Ridgeway’s refusal or failure to follow lawful directives; (iii) a criminal or civil conviction of Mr. Ridgeway, a plea of nolo contendere by Mr. Ridgeway or other conduct by Mr. Ridgeway that has resulted in, or would reasonably be expected to result in, material injury to our reputation, including conviction of fraud, theft, embezzlement or a crime involving moral turpitude; (iv) a breach by Mr. Ridgeway of any provision of the employment agreement; (v) conduct by Mr. Ridgeway constituting a material act of misconduct in connection with the performance of his duties, including violation of our policy on sexual harassment or misappropriation of our funds or property; or (vi) a violation by Mr. Ridgeway of our employment policies, including those set forth in our Employee Handbook or our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as: (i) a repeated failure by us to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; (ii) a substantial and unusual increase in Mr. Ridgeway’s duties and responsibilities without an offer of additional reasonable compensation; or (iii) a substantial and unusual reduction in Mr. Ridgeway’s duties and responsibilities.
The employment agreement also contains non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition provisions.
Michael Rowles
In March 2006, we entered into, and in March 2007 and December 2008, we amended, an employment agreement with Michael Rowles to serve as our General Counsel. In October 2009, we entered into an amended and restated agreement with Mr. Rowles to serve as our General Counsel, which superseded Mr. Rowles’ existing employment agreement. As amended and restated, the term of the employment agreement began effective September 1, 2009 and ends on December 31, 2013. After that date, the agreement will renew automatically day-to-day such that the term of the agreement will always remain at exactly one year, unless earlier terminated. This summary describes the terms of Mr. Rowles’ employment agreement as it is currently in effect based on the October 2009 amendment and restatement.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rowles receives a base salary of $550,000 per year, subject to minimum increases of five percent per year. Mr. Rowles is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus with a target equal to 100% of his base salary based on the achievement of performance targets established by the Compensation Committee, subject
to increase or decrease based on actual performance. In connection with the October 2009 amendment, Live Nation agreed to recommend to the Compensation Committee that it grant Mr. Rowles an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock and 200,000 restricted shares within 90 days of the date that our stockholders approve an amendment to our Stock Incentive Plan adding sufficient additional shares to such plan (in lieu of the proposed grants, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Rowles 300,000 restricted shares in January 2010). Under the employment agreement, upon the occurrence of a “change of control” of Live Nation, all unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Rowles will vest.
The employment agreement (i) will terminate upon Mr. Rowles’ death, (ii) may be terminated by us upon Mr. Rowles’ disability, (iii) may be terminated by us at any time without “cause” (as defined below) and for “cause,” subject to Mr. Rowles’ general right to cure, and (iv) may be terminated by Mr. Rowles at any time by providing 30 days prior written notice or (b) for “good reason” (as defined below), subject in some cases to our right to cure.
If Mr. Rowles’ employment is terminated by reason of death or disability or by us for “cause,” he is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan; and
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid.
If Mr. Rowles’ employment is terminated by us without “cause,” or by Mr. Rowles for “good reason,” he is entitled to:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which he may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan;
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid; and
subject to Mr. Rowles signing a general release of claims, a cash payment equal to Mr. Rowles’ base salary multiplied by the greater of the remainder of the employment term or two years and immediate acceleration of the vesting of all unvested equity awards then held by Mr. Rowles.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “cause” means: (i) conduct by Mr. Rowles constituting a material act of willful misconduct in connection with the performance of his duties, including violation of our policy on sexual harassment or misappropriation of our funds or property; (ii) continued, willful and deliberate non-performance by Mr. Rowles of a material duty under the employment agreement; (iii) Mr. Rowles’ refusal or failure to follow lawful directives consistent with his title and position and the terms of the employment agreement; (iv) a criminal or civil conviction of Mr. Rowles, a plea of nolo contendere by Mr. Rowles or other conduct by Mr. Rowles that, as determined in the reasonable discretion of the board of directors, has resulted in, or would result in, material injury to our reputation, including, without limitation, conviction of fraud, theft, embezzlement or a crime involving moral turpitude; (v) a repeated failure by Mr. Rowles to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; or (vi) a material violation by Mr. Rowles of our employment policies.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as: (i) a repeated failure by us to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; (ii) a material reduction in Mr. Rowles’ duties, responsibilities, authority or compensation; (iii) a material geographic relocation of Mr. Rowles’ principal work location outside Los Angeles; or (iv) a “change in control” of Live Nation in which Mr. Rowles is not offered continued employment as Live Nation’s General Counsel or General Counsel of the surviving entity.
The employment agreement also contains non-disclosure, non-solicitation, non-competition and indemnification provisions.
Kathy Willard
In September 2007, we entered into, and in December 2008, we amended, an employment agreement with Kathy Willard to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. In October 2009, we entered into an amended and restated agreement with Ms. Willard to serve as our Chief Financial Officer, which superseded Ms. Willard’s existing employment agreement. As amended and restated, the term of the employment agreement began effective September 1, 2009 and ends on December 31, 2013. After that date, the agreement will renew automatically day-to-day such that the term of the agreement will always remain at exactly one year, unless earlier terminated. This summary describes the terms of Ms. Willard’s employment agreement as it is currently in effect based on the October 2009 amendment and restatement.
Under the employment agreement, Ms. Willard receives a base salary of $600,000 per year, subject to minimum increases of five percent per year. Ms. Willard is eligible to receive an annual cash performance bonus with a target equal to 100% of her base salary based on the achievement of performance targets established by the Compensation Committee, subject to increase or decrease based on actual performance. In connection with the October 2009 amendment, Live Nation agreed to recommend to the Compensation Committee that it grant Ms. Willard an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock and 200,000 restricted shares within 90 days of the date that our stockholders approve an amendment to our Stock Incentive Plan adding sufficient additional shares to such plan (in lieu of the proposed grants, the Compensation Committee granted Ms. Willard 300,000 restricted shares in January 2010). Under the employment agreement, upon the occurrence of a “change of control” of Live Nation, all unvested equity awards then held by Ms. Willard will vest.
The employment agreement (i) will terminate upon Ms. Willard’s death, (ii) may be terminated by us upon Ms. Willard’s disability, (iii) may be terminated by us at any time without “cause” (as defined below) and for “cause,” subject to Ms. Willard’s general right to cure, and (iv) may be terminated by Ms. Willard at any time by providing 30 days prior written notice or (b) for “good reason” (as defined below), subject in some cases to our right to cure.
If Ms. Willard’s employment is terminated by reason of death or disability or by us for “cause,” she is entitled to receive:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which she may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan; and
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid.
If Ms. Willard’s employment is terminated by us without “cause,” or by Ms. Willard for “good reason,” she is entitled to:
accrued and unpaid base salary;
accrued and unused vacation pay;
unreimbursed expenses;
any payments to which she may be entitled under any applicable employee benefit plan;
a prorated performance bonus, including any performance bonus that may have been earned for the prior year but not yet paid; and
subject to Ms. Willard signing a general release of claims, a cash payment equal to Ms. Willard’s base salary multiplied by the greater of the remainder of the employment term or two years and immediate acceleration of the vesting of all unvested equity awards then held by Ms. Willard.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “cause” means: (i) conduct by Ms. Willard constituting a material act of willful misconduct in connection with the performance of her duties, including violation of our policy on sexual harassment or misappropriation of our funds or property; (ii) continued, willful and deliberate non-performance by Ms. Willard of a material duty under the employment agreement; (iii) Ms. Willard’s refusal or failure to follow lawful directives consistent with her title and position and the terms of the employment agreement; (iv) a criminal or civil conviction of Ms. Willard, a plea of nolo contendere by Ms. Willard or other conduct by Ms. Willard that, as determined in the reasonable discretion of the board of directors, has resulted in, or would result in, material injury to our reputation, including, without limitation, conviction of fraud, theft, embezzlement or a crime involving moral turpitude; (v) a repeated failure by Ms. Willard to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; or (vi) a material violation by Ms. Willard of our employment policies.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “good reason” is defined as: (i) a repeated failure by us to comply with a material term of the employment agreement; (ii) a material reduction in Ms. Willard’s duties, responsibilities, authority or compensation; or (iii) a material geographic relocation of Ms. Willard’s principal work location outside Los Angeles.
The employment agreement also contains non-disclosure, non-solicitation, non-competition and indemnification provisions.
2009 Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation for each of our named executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($) (1) | Option Awards ($) (1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (2) | All Other Compensation ($) (7) | Total ($) | |||||||||
Michael Rapino, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 2009 | 1,501,140 | — | 412,500 | 2,086,221 | 2,625,000 | 51,362 | 6,676,223 | |||||||||
2008 | 1,001,140 | — | 1,849,500 | — | 1,950,000 | 42,885 | 4,843,525 | ||||||||||
2007 | 950,700 | 1,000,000 | 10,125,000 | 5,725,485 | — | 38,106 | 17,839,291 | ||||||||||
Jason Garner, Chief Executive Officer— Global Music (3) | 2009 | 826,026 | 1,250,000 | — | 307,048 | 275,000 | — | 2,658,074 | |||||||||
2008 | 720,561 | 650,000 | — | — | 200,000 | — | 1,570,561 | ||||||||||
2007 | 468,403 | 1,000,000 | 562,500 | 1,043,663 | — | — | 3,074,566 | ||||||||||
Alan Ridgeway, Chief Executive Officer— International Music (4) | 2009 | 579,165 | — | — | — | — | 57,187 | 636,352 | |||||||||
2008 | 556,554 | — | — | — | — | 58,105 | 614,659 | ||||||||||
2007 | 510,061 | — | 311,875 | 427,275 | — | 49,752 | 1,298,963 | ||||||||||
Michael Rowles, General Counsel (5) | 2009 | 517,475 | — | — | — | 550,000 | — | 1,067,475 | |||||||||
2008 | 500,706 | — | (344,500 | ) | — | 425,000 | — | 581,206 | |||||||||
2007 | 425,454 | 300,000 | 623,750 | 427,275 | — | — | 1,776,479 | ||||||||||
Kathy Willard, Chief Financial Officer (6) | 2009 | 533,330 | — | — | — | 600,000 | — | 1,133,330 | |||||||||
2008 | 475,793 | — | — | — | 575,000 | 65,666 | 1,116,459 | ||||||||||
2007 | 368,325 | 300,000 | 1,350,000 | 279,473 | — | 76,177 | 2,373,975 |
(1) | The amounts listed are equal to the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC topic 718,Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASC 718. Additional information related to the calculation of the compensation cost is set forth in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our Annual Report on Form 10-K |
(2) | For Ms. Willard and Messrs. Rapino, Garner and Rowles, the amounts set forth in this column for 2009 reflect a cash performance bonus that was paid in 2010 but was earned based upon obtaining 2009 financial performance goals. For further discussion of these bonus payments, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this amended report. |
(3) | Mr. Garner’s bonus for 2009 represents a $250,000 cash signing bonus and a $1,000,000 cash retention bonus paid in April 2009. The cash retention bonus is offset against any subsequent performance bonuses earned by Mr. Garner. For 2009, Mr. Garner was awarded a cash performance bonus of $1,275,000 which was offset against this cash retention bonus. Mr. Garner’s non-equity incentive plan compensation for 2009 represents the portion of the performance bonus noted above that exceeded the amount required to be offset against the retention bonus. For further discussion of this retention bonus and Mr. Garner’s cash performance bonus for 2009, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this amended report and “Employment Agreements” above. |
(4) | Mr. Ridgeway served as our Chief Financial Officer through August 2007, and was named Chief Executive Officer—International Music in September 2007. Mr. Ridgeway received a cash retention bonus in 2006 that is offset against any subsequent performance bonuses earned by Mr. Ridgeway. For 2007, 2008 and 2009, Mr. Ridgeway was awarded performance bonuses of $300,000, $97,500 and $399,238, respectively, which were offset against this cash retention bonus. For further discussion of this retention bonus and Mr. Ridgeway’s cash performance bonus for 2009, see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this amended report and “Employment Agreements” above. Future performance bonuses totaling up to $203,262 may be subject to offset against Mr. Ridgeway’s 2006 cash retention bonus. Mr. Ridgeway is paid in British Pound Sterling, but all amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using an average exchange rate for the year. |
(5) | Mr. Rowles’ 2008 salary amount includes a retroactive increase to January 1, 2008 of $75,000, which was approved and paid in 2009. In March 2008, the Compensation Committee determined that we did not achieve certain financial performance goals applicable to Mr. Rowles’ 25,000-share restricted stock grant; however, the Committee determined in its discretion to vest 25% of this restricted stock grant on that date, with the remainder to vest over the following three years in accordance with its original vesting schedule. ASC 718 requires this type of modification to be treated as a |
forfeiture of the original award and an issuance of a new award. The amount disclosed for 2008 represents the incremental fair value adjustment of the modified award calculated as of the modification date. |
(6) | Ms. Willard served as our Chief Accounting Officer through August 2007 and was named Chief Financial Officer in September 2007. |
(7) | The amounts represent (i) for Mr. Rapino, an automobile allowance of $29,904, a tax gross-up payment of $6,976 relating to such automobile allowance, a medical physical exam, a tax gross-up payment of $4,970 relating to such medical physical exam and a membership to theHouse of Blues Foundation Room and (ii) for Mr. Ridgeway, a company contribution of $56,155 under a United Kingdom retirement plan and a membership to theHouse of Blues Foundation Room. Messrs. Garner and Rowles and Ms. Willard did not receive perquisites and personal benefits aggregating more than $10,000 during 2009. |
2009 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to grants of plan-based awards for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 to the named executive officers.
Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-equity Incentive Plan Awards (1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (2) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Award ($) (3) | |||||||||||||||||
Name | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | |||||||||||||||
Michael Rapino | 3/17/09 | — | — | — | — | 100,000 | (4) | — | — | 275,000 | |||||||||||
3/17/09 | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | (4) | — | — | 137,500 | ||||||||||||
3/17/09 | — | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 3,000,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
3/17/09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,000,000 | 2,086,221 | |||||||||||||
Jason Garner | 3/17/09 | — | $ | 850,000 | $ | 1,700,000 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
3/17/09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 300,000 | 307,048 | |||||||||||||
Alan Ridgeway | 3/17/09 | — | $ | 399,238 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Michael Rowles | 3/17/09 | — | $ | 550,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Kathy Willard | 3/17/09 | — | $ | 600,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | No threshold amounts were applicable to non-equity incentive plan awards. |
(2) | The amounts reflect the number of stock options or shares of restricted stock granted under our Stock Incentive Plan. |
(3) | The dollar values of stock option and restricted stock awards disclosed in this column are equal to the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with ASC 718, except that no assumptions for forfeitures were included for restricted stock awards. A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the grant date fair value is set forth in Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated |
(4) | Mr. Rapino’s 100,000-share and 50,000-share restricted stock awards each vested 100% on January 25, 2010, in connection with the closing of the merger with Ticketmaster. |
2009 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2009 granted to each of our named executive officers.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) (2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (3) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (1) | ||||||||||
Name | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||||||||
Michael Rapino (4) | 167,500 | 167,500 | — | 10.60 | 12/2012 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 41,875 | 356,356 | — | — | ||||||||||
335,000 | 335,000 | — | 24.95 | 2/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 75,000 | 638,250 | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | 425,500 | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 25,000 | 212,750 | — | — | ||||||||||
— | 2,000,000 | — | 2.75 | 3/2019 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100,000 | 851,000 | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | 425,500 | ||||||||||
Jason Garner | — | — | — | — | — | 7,500 | 63,825 | — | — | |||||||||
50,000 | 50,000 | — | 24.95 | 2/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
12,500 | 12,500 | — | 22.50 | 10/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 12,500 | 106,375 | — | — | ||||||||||
— | 300,000 | — | 2.75 | 3/2019 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Alan Ridgeway | — | — | — | — | — | 31,250 | 265,938 | — | — | |||||||||
25,000 | 25,000 | — | 24.95 | 2/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Michael Rowles (5) | — | — | — | — | — | 3,750 | 31,913 | — | — | |||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 19,688 | 167,545 | — | — | ||||||||||
25,000 | 25,000 | — | 24.95 | 2/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 12,500 | 106,375 | — | — | ||||||||||
Kathy Willard (5) | 12,500 | 12,500 | — | 10.60 | 12/2012 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
7,500 | 7,500 | — | 24.95 | 2/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
10,000 | 10,000 | — | 22.50 | 10/2017 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 30,000 | 255,300 | — | — |
(1) | Market value of restricted stock grants is determined by using the closing price of $8.51 per share for our common stock on December 31, 2009, the last business day of the 2009 fiscal year. The amounts indicated are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that may be realized by our named executive officers if and when these awards vest, due to potential fluctuations in the value of our common stock. |
(2) | The following table provides information with respect to our named executive officers’ unvested stock options as of the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Vesting Date | Michael Rapino | Jason Garner | Alan Ridgeway | Michael Rowles | Kathy Willard | |||||
February 2010 | 167,500 | 25,000 | 12,500 | 12,500 | 3,750 | |||||
March 2010 | 400,000 | 75,000 | — | — | — | |||||
October 2010 | — | 6,250 | — | — | 5,000 | |||||
December 2010 | 167,500 | — | — | — | 12,500 | |||||
February 2011 | 167,500 | 25,000 | 12,500 | 12,500 | 3,750 | |||||
March 2011 | 400,000 | 75,000 | — | — | — | |||||
October 2011 | — | 6,250 | — | — | 5,000 | |||||
March 2012 | 400,000 | 75,000 | — | — | — | |||||
March 2013 | 400,000 | 75,000 | — | — | — | |||||
March 2014 | 400,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total | 2,502,500 | 362,500 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 30,000 | |||||
(3) | The following table provides information with respect to our named executive officers’ earned but unvested restricted stock awards as of the year ended December 31, 2009. |
Vesting Date | Michael Rapino | Jason Garner | Alan Ridgeway | Michael Rowles | Kathy Willard | |||||
February 2010 | — | — | — | 6,250 | — | |||||
March 2010 | 75,000 | — | — | — | — | |||||
April 2010 | — | — | — | 1,250 | — | |||||
May 2010 | — | 2,500 | — | 6,563 | — | |||||
October 2010 | — | 6,250 | — | — | 15,000 | |||||
December 2010 | 116,875 | — | 31,250 | — | — | |||||
February 2011 | — | — | — | 6,250 | — | |||||
April 2011 | — | — | — | 2,500 | — | |||||
May 2011 | — | 5,000 | — | 13,125 | — | |||||
October 2011 | — | 6,250 | — | — | 15,000 | |||||
Total | 191,875 | 20,000 | 31,250 | 35,938 | 30,000 | |||||
(4) | Mr. Rapino’s unearned 100,000-share restricted stock award was to have vested in equal installments in each of March 2010 and 2011 upon our having achieved certain applicable financial performance goals. Mr. Rapino’s unearned 50,000-share restricted stock award was to have vested in equal installments in each of March 2010 and 2011 if certain operational objectives specified by the Compensation Committee were satisfied by March 31, 2010. On January 25, 2010, in connection with the closing of the merger with Ticketmaster, all of Mr. Rapino’s unvested and unearned restricted stock awards immediately accelerated and were vested and, with the exception of the 2,000,000 stock option award, all of Mr. Rapino’s unexercisable stock options immediately accelerated and were vested. |
(5) | On January 25, 2010, in connection with the closing of the merger with Ticketmaster, all of Ms. Willard’s and Mr. Rowles’ unexercisable stock options and unvested restricted stock awards were vested 100%. |
2009 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($) | ||||
Michael Rapino (1) | — | — | 245,938 | 1,228,148 | ||||
Jason Garner (2) | — | — | 8,750 | 66,913 | ||||
Alan Ridgeway (3) | — | — | 15,625 | 134,063 | ||||
Michael Rowles (4) | — | — | 14,062 | 65,750 | ||||
Kathy Willard (5) | — | — | 15,000 | 124,050 |
(1) | Upon the vesting of Mr. Rapino’s restricted stock awards, 50,564 shares of our common stock with an aggregate value on vesting of $488,692 were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. |
(2) | Upon the vesting of Mr. Garner’s restricted stock award, 3,129 shares of our common stock with an aggregate value on vesting of $23,928 were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. |
(3) | Upon the vesting of Mr. Ridgeway’s restricted stock award, 2,063 shares of our common stock with an aggregate value on vesting of $17,701 were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. |
(4) | Upon the vesting of Mr. Rowles’ restricted stock award, 5,028 shares of our common stock with an aggregate value on vesting of $23,509 were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. |
(5) | Upon the vesting of Ms. Willard’s restricted stock award, 5,363 shares of our common stock with an aggregate value on vesting of $44,352 were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations. |
2009 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Name | Executive Aggregate Contributions in 2009 ($)(1) | Registrant Aggregate Contributions in 2009 ($) | Aggregate Earnings in 2009 ($) | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | Aggregate Balance at December 31, 2009 ($) | |||||
Michael Rapino | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Jason Garner | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Alan Ridgeway | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Michael Rowles | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
Kathy Willard | — | — | 676 | — | 25,875 |
(1) | Amounts disclosed in this table have not been reported in the Summary Compensation Table in any year. |
Deferred Compensation Plan
Our named executive officers, directors and other designated management employees were able to defer a portion of their annual compensation, including, as applicable, salary, director fees, commissions and bonuses, into the Live Nation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. However, the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan was frozen to additional participation beginning January 2010. Specifically, participants were able to defer under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan:
not less than 1% nor more than 50% of base salary and commissions;
not less than 1% nor more than 80% of bonus; and
not less than 1% but up to 100% of director compensation paid in cash.
Notwithstanding the deferral limits set forth above, the Compensation Committee may increase or decrease the above percentages in its discretion.
The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may make matching contributions to each participant’s account. Generally, we have made matching contributions under our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan equal to the matching contribution that would have been made under the 401(k) Savings Plan for a contribution by a participant of up to five percent of the participant’s eligible compensation as defined under the 401(k) Savings Plan (disregarding limits imposed by the Code), less the amount of any actual matching contribution made to the 401(k) Savings Plan. We did not make matching contributions under our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan during 2009.
Participants are 100% vested in any amounts they deferred under the plan, while matching contributions, if any, vest 50% after the participant’s second full year of service and 100% after the third full year of service, after which all matching contributions are fully vested at the time they are made. However, upon a participant’s retirement, disability or death, any matching contributions become fully vested. Participants were entitled to invest their deferral accounts into one or more hypothetical investment vehicles which did not include our common stock. Those hypothetical investment vehicles were selected in the sole discretion of a board-appointed benefits committee, consisting of members of senior management representing our finance, human resources and legal departments, as well as representatives from various of our other business units. All dividends, interest, earnings and losses from such investment vehicles are credited or charged to the participant’s deferral account, as appropriate.
Deferrals are made for a minimum of three years prior to any in-service distributions. Generally, account balances are paid upon the participant’s termination, retirement or death, and assuming the minimum three-year deferral period is met and the deferral amount is otherwise vested, a participant may request in-service withdrawals of his or her account in lump-sum or annual installment payments. All distributions and withdrawals under the plan are in cash. Participants may also make withdrawals under the plan in the event of an unforeseen emergency. The Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan is unfunded and subject to the claims of our creditors in the event of bankruptcy.
As of December 31, 2009, one of our named executive officers was participating in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (although the named executive officer did not make any new deferrals during 2009).
2009 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Name | Benefit (1) | Termination w/o Cause ($) | Termination w/Good Reason ($) | Voluntary Termination ($) | Death ($) | Disability ($) (9) | Closing of Merger ($) | Change in Control ($) | |||||||||
Michael Rapino | Severance (2) | 14,000,000 | 14,000,000 | — | — | — | — | 14,000,000 | |||||||||
Equity Awards (2) (3) | 14,429,356 | 14,429,356 | — | 14,429,356 | — | 2,909,356 | 14,429,356 | ||||||||||
Tax Gross-up (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,887,612 | ||||||||||
Total | 28,429,356 | 28,429,356 | — | 14,429,356 | — | 2,909,356 | 38,316,968 | ||||||||||
Jason Garner | Severance (5) | 2,550,000 | 2,550,000 | — | — | — | — | 2,550,000 | |||||||||
Equity Awards (3) | 1,898,200 | 1,898,200 | — | 1,898,200 | — | — | 1,898,200 | ||||||||||
Total | 4,448,200 | 4,448,200 | — | 1,898,200 | — | — | 4,448,200 | ||||||||||
Alan Ridgeway | Severance (6) | 782,427 | 782,427 | (602,500 | ) | 203,262 | 203,262 | — | 782,427 | ||||||||
Equity Awards (3) (6) | 159,563 | 159,563 | — | 265,938 | — | — | 265,938 | ||||||||||
Total | 941,990 | 941,990 | (602,500 | ) | 469,200 | 203,262 | — | 1,048,365 | |||||||||
Michael Rowles | Severance (7) | 2,200,000 | 2,200,000 | — | — | — | — | 2,200,000 | |||||||||
Equity Awards (3) | 305,832 | 305,832 | — | 305,832 | — | 305,832 | 305,832 | ||||||||||
Total | 2,505,832 | 2,505,832 | — | 305,832 | — | 305,832 | 2,505,832 | ||||||||||
Kathy Willard | Severance (8) | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | — | — | — | — | 2,400,000 | |||||||||
Equity Awards (3) | 255,300 | 255,300 | — | 255,300 | — | 255,300 | 255,300 | ||||||||||
Total | 2,655,300 | 2,655,300 | — | 255,300 | — | 255,300 | 2,655,300 | ||||||||||
(1) | All benefits are calculated as if these events were to occur on December 31, 2009, the last business day of the 2009 fiscal year, as required under the applicable rules. Each named executive officer is entitled to receive his or her accrued and unpaid base salary and prorated performance bonus upon termination, including a termination in connection with a “change in control,” except that no pro-rated bonus will be paid in connection with a termination for “cause.” If a named executive officer is terminated for “cause,” he or she generally is entitled to receive only his or her accrued and unpaid base salary (including accrued paid-time-off), except that Mr. Rapino would also be entitled to receive any accrued and unpaid cash performance bonus. Consequently, this table reflects only the additional compensation the named executive officers would receive upon termination, including a termination in connection with a “change in control.” Benefits reflected in the table are estimates; the actual benefit payable is determined upon termination. For definitions of “cause” and “good reason” applicable to the named executive officers, a description of the payment schedules applicable to the payments summarized in this table, and the applicability of restrictive covenants, see “Employment Agreements” above. |
(2) | If Mr. Rapino’s employment is terminated by him for “good reason” or he is terminated by us without “cause,” provided he signs a general release of claims, he will receive consideration of (i) $14,000,000 and (ii) the acceleration of all stock option and restricted stock awards. Upon the closing of the merger, Mr. Rapino was entitled to accelerated vesting of all of his unvested equity awards, except that an option grant covering 2,000,000 shares of our common stock that was made to Mr. Rapino on March 17, 2009 did not vest upon the closing of the merger (but will vest upon a subsequent “change in control”). Assuming the merger had closed on December 31, 2009, we would have accelerated no stock options and 341,875 shares of restricted stock, the value of which is $2,909,356 based upon the closing sale price of our common stock on December 31, 2009 of $8.51. The values of accelerated stock options and restricted shares exclude stock options where the exercise price exceeds the closing sale price of our common stock on December 31, 2009. The severance amount listed for Mr. Rapino in the “Change in Control” column only becomes payable if Mr. Rapino experiences a qualifying termination in connection with a “change in control.” The gross-up payment amount assumes that Mr. Rapino is terminated and becomes entitled to severance in connection with the change in control. |
(3) | In the event of either a “change in control” or the death of an officer, the officer’s outstanding unvested stock options and shares of restricted stock would immediately vest in their entirety pursuant to the terms of the applicable grant agreements; however, the merger did not constitute a “change in control” for purposes of these agreements. The values of accelerated stock options and restricted shares are based upon the closing sale price of our common stock on December 31, 2009 of $8.51 but exclude stock options where the exercise price exceeds the closing sale price of our common stock on December 31, 2009. |
(4) | This amount represents the tax gross-up payment to which Mr. Rapino would have been entitled if he had experienced a qualifying termination on December 31, 2009 in connection with a change in control of the company. In October 2009, Mr. Rapino entered into a new employment agreement which became effective upon closing of the merger in January |
2010. The new employment agreement provides for modified severance, equity awards and other terms and conditions which may impact the amount of the gross-up payment if it becomes payable in the future. |
(5) | If Mr. Garner’s employment is terminated by him for “good reason” or by us without “cause,” provided he signs a general release of claims, he will receive consideration of (i) $2,550,000 and (ii) the acceleration of all stock option and restricted stock awards. The severance amount listed for Mr. Garner in the “Change in Control” column only becomes payable if Mr. Garner experiences a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control. |
(6) | If Mr. Ridgeway’s employment is terminated by him for “good reason” or by us without “cause,” provided he signs a general release of claims, he will receive consideration of (i) $579,165, (ii) the acceleration of 20% of all stock option and restricted stock awards for each year elapsed from the date of their grant through such termination and (iii) the obligation to repay the $203,262 unearned portion of his retention bonus would be forgiven. Because the original retention bonus was paid in U.S. Dollars and some of the bonuses earned by Mr. Ridgeway have been in British Pound Sterling, the actual unearned amount may fluctuate from the above depending on the actual exchange rate changes. Assuming such termination occurred on December 31, 2009, we would have accelerated 18,750 shares of restricted stock, the value of which is $159,563 based upon the closing sale price of our common stock on December 31, 2009 of $8.51. If Mr. Ridgeway terminates his employment voluntarily (other than for “good reason”), or he is terminated by us for “cause,” he would be obligated to repay us for any unearned portion of his retention bonus, which as of December 31,
|
(7) | If Mr. Rowles’ employment is terminated by him for “good reason” or by us without “cause,” provided he signs a general release of claims, he will receive consideration of (i) $2,200,000 and |
(8) | If Ms. Willard’s employment is terminated by her for “good reason” or by us without “cause,” provided she signs a general release of claims, she will receive consideration of (i) $2,400,000 and
|
(9) | Upon disability, generally, each named executive officer’s stock options will continue to vest, and the restrictions on any restricted stock awards will continue to lapse, in accordance with their terms. |
Change in Control Provisions
For a more detailed description of the “change in control” provisions applicable to our named executive officers under their employment agreements, see “Employment Agreements” above.
Director Compensation
During 2009, we paid each of our non-employee directors an annual cash retainer of $60,000. In addition, in 2010 we made a grant of $125,000 in shares of restricted stock based on the average closing stock price of our stock during the 20 trading days prior to the date of the grant to each non-employee director for their service in 2009. Additionally, we pay (i) each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000, $6,000 and $4,500, respectively; (ii) the Chairpersons of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee a further annual cash retainer of $11,000, $6,500 and $5,500, respectively, and (iii) a per-meeting fee of $1,500 to directors and committee members for attendance at meetings in excess of eight board or directors meetings, eight Audit Committee meetings, eight Compensation Committee meetings and/or five Nominating and Governance Committee meetings per year, as applicable. We may also grant additional discretionary stock-based awards to our non-employee directors, and these directors may elect to receive their cash fees in the form of shares of our common stock. In addition, in March 2009, each of Messrs. Enloe, Emanuel and Shapiro received a cash payment of $25,000 for their extraordinary efforts made in connection with the merger process while serving on the Compensation Committee.
Generally, only non-employee directors are eligible to receive compensation for their services as a director. Accordingly, Mr. Rapino, our President and Chief Executive Officer, did not receive any separate director compensation during 2009, and, going forward, Mr. Azoff, who became our Executive Chairman in 2010, will not receive any separate director compensation.
2009 Director Compensation Table
The following table shows compensation of the non-employee members of our board for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. As discussed above, any board member who is also an employee of the company does not receive separate compensation for service on the board.
Name (1) | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) (2) (3) | Stock Option Awards ($) (2) | Total ($) | ||||
Irving L. Azoff | — | — | — | — | ||||
Mark Carleton | — | — | — | — | ||||
Barry Diller | — | — | — | — | ||||
Jonathan Dolgen | — | — | — | — | ||||
Ariel Emanuel | 91,000 | 130,452 | — | 221,452 | ||||
Robert Ted Enloe, III | 107,500 | 130,452 | — | 237,952 | ||||
Jeffrey T. Hinson | 81,000 | 130,452 | — | 211,452 | ||||
James S. Kahan | 80,000 | 130,452 | — | 210,452 | ||||
Victor Kaufman | — | — | — | — | ||||
John C. Malone | — | — | — | — | ||||
L. Lowry Mays | 60,000 | 130,452 | — | 190,452 | ||||
Randall T. Mays | 60,000 | 130,452 | — | 190,452 | ||||
Connie McCombs McNab | 64,500 | 130,452 | — | 194,952 | ||||
Jonathan F. Miller | — | — | — | — | ||||
Michael Rapino | — | — | — | — | ||||
Mark S. Shapiro | 91,000 | 130,452 | — | 221,452 | ||||
Harvey Weinstein | 15,000 | — | — | 15,000 |
(1) | Mr. Weinstein resigned from our board of |