UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K/A10-K

(Amendment No. 1)

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 20092010

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period                      from to                     

Commission File No. 000-22754

 

 

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

 

Pennsylvania 23-2003332

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

5000 South Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19112-1495
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 454-5500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Shares, $.0001 par value The NASDAQ Global Select Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website,website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceedingpreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”“accelerated “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filerx x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Smaller reporting company

¨

Indicate by a checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $4,219,837,641.$3,087,566,534.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock on March 26, 20092010 was 167,729,688.168,888,271.

 

 


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

We are filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) to reviseCertain information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 is incorporated by reference into Part III hereof from portions of the disclosures identified below, which were included in our proxy statement (the “2009 Proxy Statement”)Statement for ourthe registrant’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held Tuesday, May 19, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 1, 2009, and incorporated into Part III, Item 11 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 (the “Original Annual Report”), filed with the SEC on April 1, 2009. Pursuant to Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Amendment contains the complete text of the information incorporated into Item 11, as amended.Shareholders.

In response to a comment letter we received from the SEC, we are amending and restating Item 11 of our Original Annual Report solely to revise the disclosure in the third sentence of the fourth paragraph under the caption “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses,” which disclosure was originally included in our 2009 Proxy Statement. There were no changes made to the Executive Incentive Plan or the bonus criteria under that plan, which determine bonuses to our named executive officers.

Except as described above, we have not modified or updated other disclosures presented in the 2009 Proxy Statement or the Original Annual Report. This Amendment does not amend, update or change the financial statements or any other disclosures in the Original Annual Report and does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Original Annual Report. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with our filings with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Annual Report.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART IIII

Item 11.1.

  

Executive CompensationBusiness

  1

Item 1A.

  

PART IVRisk Factors

  11

Item 15.1B.

  

Unresolved Staff Comments

16

Item 2.

Properties

16

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

19

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

19
PART II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

20

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

22

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

23

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

36

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

37

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

37

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

38

Item 9B.

Other Information

41
PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

41

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

43

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

43

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

44

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

44
PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  1845
  

Signatures

  2047

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1


This filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is being made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain matters contained in this filing may constitute forward-looking statements. When used in this Form 10-K, the words “project,” “believe,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Any one, or all, of the following factors could cause actual financial results to differ materially from those financial results mentioned in the forward-looking statements: the difficulty in predicting and responding to shifts in fashion trends, changes in the level of competitive pricing and promotional activity and other industry factors, overall economic and market conditions and the resultant impact on consumer spending patterns, lowered levels of consumer confidence and higher levels of unemployment, and continuation of lowered levels of consumer spending resulting from the recent worldwide economic downturn, any effects of terrorist acts or war, availability of suitable retail space for expansion, timing of store openings, seasonal fluctuations in gross sales, the departure of one or more key senior managers, import risks, including potential disruptions and changes in duties, tariffs and quotas, the closing of any of our distribution centers, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, risks associated with internet sales, response to new store concepts, potential difficulty liquidating certain marketable security investments and other risks identified in our filings with the SEC, including those set forth in item 1A of this Form 10-K. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that actual results may differ materially from any projected results expressed or implied therein.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “Urban Outfitters,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “our company” refer to Urban Outfitters, Inc., together with its subsidiaries.

PART I

PART IIIItem 1. Business

Item 11.Executive Compensation

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORSGeneral

FISCAL 2009We are a leading lifestyle specialty retail company that operates under the Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain brands. We also operate a wholesale segment under the Free People and Leifsdottir brands. We have over 39 years of experience creating and managing retail stores that offer highly differentiated collections of fashion apparel, accessories and home goods in inviting and dynamic store settings. Our core strategy is to provide unified store environments that establish emotional bonds with the customer. In addition to our retail stores, we offer our products and market our brands directly to the consumer through our e-commerce web sites,www.urbanoutfitters.com,www.anthropologie.com, www.freepeople.com,www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk, andwww.shopterrain.comand also through our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People catalogs. We have achieved compounded annual sales growth of approximately 19% over the past five years, with sales of approximately $1.9 billion in fiscal 2010.

We opened our first store in 1970 near the University of Pennsylvania campus in Philadelphia. We were incorporated in Pennsylvania in 1976, and opened our second store in Harvard Square, Cambridge, Massachusetts in 1980. The first Anthropologie store opened in a suburb of Philadelphia in October 1992. We started doing business in Europe in 1998, with our first European store located in London. We opened our first Free People store in the Garden State Plaza Mall in Paramus, New Jersey in November 2002. We opened our first Terrain garden center in Glen Mills, Pennsylvania in April 2008. We opened our first European Anthropologie in London in October 2009.

Name

  Fees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All
Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)

Scott A. Belair

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Harry S. Cherken, Jr.

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Joel S. Lawson III

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

Robert H. Strouse

  100,000 —    232,620†**  —    —    —    332,620

In 1984 we established the Free People wholesale division to develop, in conjunction with Urban Outfitters, private label apparel lines of young women’s casual wear that could be effectively sold at attractive prices in Urban Outfitters stores. In 2009, we launched Leifsdottir, a sophisticated wholesale brand.

*Represents amounts paid in cash
The FAS 123(R) value of the options granted on May 20, 2008, was $10.78 per share. The Company used a Lattice Binomial Model in Fiscal 2009. The May 20, 2008 total option value is $215,600 (20,000 shares x $10.78 per share). Fiscal 2009 option expense is $148,770 relating to the May 20, 2008 grant and $83,850 relating to the May 22, 2007 grant. The Options granted on May 22, 2007 had a FAS 123(R) value of $13.73; during fiscal year 2008 the Company used the Black Scholes Valuation Model. For a discussion of the assumptions utilized in the Lattice Binomial Model and Black Scholes Model, please see note 9 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2009.
**At the end of Fiscal 2009, all 20,000 options from the May 20, 2008 grant were not vested.

Each director who is not also an employeeOur fiscal year ends on January 31. All references in this discussion to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, our fiscal 2010 ended on January 31, 2010.

Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Company (“Outside Directors”) is paid two cash installments consistingSecurities Exchange Act of (i) a $50,000 payment following election1934, as a Director at the applicable annual meetingamended, are available free of shareholders, and (ii) a $50,000 payment in February following completion of the fiscal year.

During Fiscal 2009, the Company granted, on a discretionary basis, each Outside Director the option to purchase 20,000 Common Shares under the Company’s 2004 Stock Option Plan. The exercise price of the non-qualified stock options granted under the Plan was $30.495.

All directors and their immediate families are eligible to receive discountscharge on our merchandise through use of discount cards issued to them and in accordanceinvestor relations web site,www.urbanoutfittersinc.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, our employee merchandise discount policy.

The Board of Directors believes it is good corporate practice to periodically review and reevaluate the total compensation paidor furnish such material to, the Company’s Outside Directors for their service on the BoardSEC. We will voluntarily provide electronic or paper copies (other than exhibits) of Directors, including the cash and equity componentsour filings free of that compensation. The Board of Directors intends to review the compensation paidcharge upon written request. You may also obtain any materials we file with, or furnish to, the Outside Directors following the Annual Meeting and will make any adjustments it deems appropriate.

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERSSEC on its web site atwww.sec.gov.

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisRetail Segment

Company ObjectivesUrban Outfitters. Urban Outfitters targets young adults aged 18 to 30 through its unique merchandise mix and compelling store environment. We have established a reputation with these young adults, who are culturally sophisticated, self-expressive and concerned with acceptance by their peer group. The product offering includes women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, as well as an eclectic mix of apartment wares and gifts. Apartment wares range from rugs, pillows and shower curtains to books, candles and novelties. Stores average approximately 9,000 square feet of selling space, and typically carry an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 stock keeping units (“SKUs”). Our stores are located in large metropolitan areas, select university communities, specialty centers and enclosed malls. Our stores accommodate our customers’ propensity not only to shop, but also to congregate with their peers. As of January 31, 2010, we operated 155 Urban Outfitters stores in North America and Europe, as well as thewww.urbanoutfitters.comandwww.urbanoutfitters.co.uk web sites and the Urban Outfitters catalog. We plan to open approximately 19 Urban Outfitters stores in fiscal 2011. Urban Outfitters’ North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 33.7% and 5.5% of consolidated net sales, respectively, for fiscal 2010.

Anthropologie. Anthropologie tailors its merchandise and inviting store environment to sophisticated and contemporary women aged 30 to 45. Anthropologie’s unique and eclectic product assortment includes women’s casual apparel and accessories, home furnishings and a diverse array of gifts and decorative items. The Company’s compensation programhome furnishings range from furniture, rugs, lighting and antiques to table top items, bedding and gifts. Stores average approximately 7,400 square feet of selling space, typically carry an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 SKUs and are located in specialty retail centers, upscale street locations and enclosed malls. As of January 31, 2010, we operated 137 Anthropologie stores in North America and Europe, as well as thewww.anthropologie.com web site and the Anthropologie catalog. We plan to open approximately 17 Anthropologie stores in fiscal 2011. Anthropologie’s North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 36.1% and 0.3% of consolidated net sales, respectively, for fiscal 2010.

Free People. Our Free People retail stores primarily offer Free People branded merchandise targeted to young contemporary women aged 25 to 30. Free People offers a unique merchandise mix of casual women’s apparel, accessories and gifts. Free People retail stores average approximately 1,400 square feet of selling space, carry up to 5,000 SKUs and are located in enclosed malls, upscale street locations and specialty retail centers. The retail channels of Free People expose both our wholesale accounts and retail customers to the full Free People product assortment and store environment. As of January 31, 2010, we operated 34 Free People stores in the United States, as well as thewww.freepeople.com web site and the Free People catalog. We plan to open approximately 9 new Free People stores in fiscal 2011. Free People retail store sales accounted for approximately 2.0% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

Terrain. Terrain is designed to attract, retain,appeal to men and motivate executivewomen interested in a creative, sophisticated outdoor living and key employee talentgardening experience. Terrain creates a compelling shopping environment through its large and free standing site, inspired by the ‘greenhouse’. Merchandise includes lifestyle home and garden products combined with antiques, live plants, flowers, wellness products and accessories. Our Terrain garden center operates approximately 20,000 square feet of enclosed selling space as well as approximately two acres of outdoor seasonal selling space used for live plants, accessories and outdoor furniture. Terrain also offers a variety of landscape and design service solutions. Terrain also operates a web site,www.shopterrain.com. Terrain retail sales accounted for less than 1% of our consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010. We will continue to evaluate locations for future Terrain garden centers in fiscal 2011.

Catalogs and Websites

Anthropologie offers a direct-to-consumer catalog that markets select merchandise, most of which is also available in our Anthropologie stores. We believe the catalog has been instrumental in helping to build the Anthropologie brand identity with our target customers. We believe our catalog expands our distribution channels and increases brand awareness. During fiscal 2010, we circulated approximately 17.4 million catalogs and plan to increase circulation to approximately 18.4 million catalogs in fiscal 2011.

Anthropologie operates a web site,www.anthropologie.com,which accepts orders directly from customers. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar array of apparel, accessories and household and gift merchandise as found in the stores. As with our catalog, we believe that the web site increases Anthropologie’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of its primary objectiveAnthropologie’s store operations.

Urban Outfitters offers a direct-to-consumer catalog offering select merchandise, most of building compelling brandswhich is also available in our Urban Outfitters stores. We believe the catalog has been instrumental in helping to build the Urban Outfitters brand identity with our target customers. We believe our catalog expands our distribution channels and increases brand awareness. During fiscal 2010, we circulated approximately 12.1 million Urban Outfitters catalogs and plan to increase our circulation to approximately 13.2 million catalogs in fiscal 2011.

Urban Outfitters operates a web site,www.urbanoutfitters.com, that connectaccepts orders directly from customers. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. As with the customerUrban Outfitters catalog, we believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its target customers, as well as helps to support the traffic of Urban Outfitters’ store operations.

Urban Outfitters also operates a web site targeting our European customers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk, captures the spirit of our European stores by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. Fulfillment is provided from a third-party distribution center located in the United Kingdom. We believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its European target customers as well as helps to support our Urban Outfitters’ European store operations.

Free People offers a direct-to-consumer catalog offering select merchandise most of which is also available in our Free People stores. We believe the catalog has been instrumental in helping to build the Free People brand identity with our target customers. We believe our catalog expands our distribution channels and increases brand awareness. During fiscal 2010, we circulated approximately 7.4 million catalogs and plan to expand circulation to approximately 8.2 million catalogs in fiscal 2011.

Free People operates a web site,www.freepeople.com,that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site exposes consumers to the product assortment found at Free People retail stores as well as all of the Free People wholesale offerings. As with the Free People catalog, we believe that the web site increases Free People’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of Free People’s store operations.

Terrain operates a web site that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site,www.shopterrain.com, was launched in September 2009. The web site exposes consumers to a portion of the product assortment found at the Terrain retail store. We believe that the web site increases Terrain’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of the Terrain’s store operations.

Increases in our catalog circulation are driven by our evaluation of the response rate to each individual catalog. Based upon that evaluation, we adjust the frequency and circulation of our catalog portfolio as needed. In addition, we evaluate the buying pattern of our direct-to-consumer customers to determine which customers who respond to our catalog mailings. We also utilize the services of list rental companies to identify potential customers that will receive future catalogs.

We plan on increasing our spending on investments in web marketing for Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain in fiscal 2011. These increases will be based on our daily evaluation of the customers response rate to our marketing investments.

Direct-to-consumer sales for all brands combined were approximately 16.7% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

Wholesale Segment

The Free People wholesale division was established in 1984 to develop, in conjunction with Urban Outfitters, private label apparel lines of young women’s casual wear that could be effectively sold at attractive prices in Urban Outfitters stores. In order to achieve minimum production lots, Free People wholesale began selling to other retailers throughout the United States. During fiscal 2010, Free People’s range of tops, bottoms, sweaters and dresses were sold worldwide through approximately 1,400 better department and specialty stores, including Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, Belk, Urban Outfitters and its own Free People stores. Free People currently sells its merchandise under ourFree Peopleand other labels. We also distribute our Free People products in certain department stores using a shop-within-shop sales model. We believe that the shop-within-shop model allows for a more complete merchandising of our Free People products and will give us greater freedom in differentiating the presentation of our products and further strengthening of our brand image. We monitor the styles and products that are popular with our wholesale customers to give us insight into current fashion trends, which helps us better serve our retail customers. Free People presently maintains wholesale sales and showroom facilities in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago. Free People wholesale sales accounted for approximately 4.9% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

In addition to selling its merchandise to specialty retailers, Free People wholesale also shares production sourcing with our retail segment. Free People employs its own senior and creative management staff, but shares business support services with the retail segment.

The Leifsdottir wholesale division was established in fiscal 2009. Leifsdottir designs, develops and markets sophisticated women’s contemporary apparel including dresses, tops and bottoms. Leifsdottir is sold through luxury department stores including Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, select specialty stores and our own Anthropologie stores. We also distribute our Leifsdottir products in certain department stores using a shop-within-shop sales model. We believe that the shop-within-shop model allows for a more complete merchandising of our Leifsdottir products and will give us greater freedom in differentiating the presentation of our products and further strengthening our brand image. Leifsdottir presently maintains a wholesale sales and showroom facility in New York City. Leifsdottir wholesale sales accounted for less than 1% of total consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

Store Environment

We create a unified environment in our stores that establishes an emotional level. The Company believes that delivering valuebond with the customer. Every element of the environment is tailored to the aesthetic preferences of our target customers. Through creative design, much of the existing retail space is modified to incorporate a mosaic of fixtures, finishes and revealed architectural details. In our stores, merchandise is integrated into a variety of creative vignettes and displays designed to offer our customers an entire look at a distinct lifestyle. This dynamic visual merchandising and display technique provides the connection among the store design, the merchandise and the customer. Essential components of the ambience of each store may include playing music that appeals to our target customers, using unique signage and employing a staff that understands and identifies with the target customer.

Anthropologie considers it important to create an individualized and tailored store shopping experience for each customer. By providing an inviting and pleasant shopping atmosphere and an attentive sales staff, including, in many stores, in-store customer care managers, we strive to create a

sense of community in our Anthropologie stores that encourages our target customers to linger and spend time exploring our stores and product offerings. Anthropologie stores are often placed in unique and non-traditional retail locations. A majority of our Anthropologie stores opened during fiscal 2010 were located in specialty retail centers, upscale street locations and enclosed shopping malls. We plan to implement an Anthropologie location expansion strategy in fiscal 2011 similar to our strategy in fiscal 2010.

Our Urban Outfitters stores are often located in unconventional retail spaces, including a former movie theater, a bank and a stock exchange. A majority of our Urban Outfitters stores that opened in fiscal 2010 were located in upscale street locations, specialty retail centers and enclosed shopping malls. We plan to implement an Urban Outfitters location expansion strategy in fiscal 2011 similar to our strategy in fiscal 2010.

Our Free People retail stores opened to date are primarily located in enclosed shopping malls, specialty retail centers and upscale street locations. We plan to implement a Free People location expansion strategy in fiscal 2011 similar to our strategy in fiscal 2010.

Our Terrain garden center is a free-standing location on ten acres of land with street-front view and access. We plan to evaluate a future Terrain location utilizing a similar venue in fiscal 2011.

Buying Operations

Maintaining a constant flow of fashionable merchandise for our retail segment is critically important to the ongoing performance of our stores and direct-to-consumer operations. We maintain our own buying groups that select and develop products to satisfy our target customers and provide us with the appropriate amount and timing of products. Merchandise managers may supervise several buyers and assistant buyers. Our buyers stay in touch with the evolving tastes of their target customers by excellingshopping at ‘experiential retailing’ is the foundationmajor trade markets, attending national and regional trade shows and staying current with mass media influences, including internet music, video, film, magazines and pop culture.

Merchandise

Our Urban Outfitters stores, web sites and catalogs offer a wide array of eclectic merchandise, including women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, and apartment wares and gifts. Product offerings in our Anthropologie stores, web site and catalogs include women’s casual apparel and accessories, as well as home furnishings and an eclectic array of gifts and decorative accessories for the long-term maximizationhome, garden, bed and bath. Our Free People retail stores, web site and catalog offer a showcase for casual apparel, accessories and gifts, primarily developed and designed by our Free People wholesale division. Our Terrain garden center offers lifestyle home and garden products combined with antiques, live plants, flowers, wellness products and accessories. Our merchandise is continuously updated to appeal to our target customers’ changing tastes and is supplied by a large number of shareholder value.domestic and foreign vendors, with new shipments of merchandise arriving at our stores almost daily. The wide breadth of merchandise offered by our retail segment includes national third-party brands, as well as exclusive merchandise developed and designed internally by our brands. This selection allows us to offer fashionable merchandise and to differentiate our product mix from that of traditional department stores, as well as that of other specialty and direct-to-consumer retailers. Merchandise designed and developed by our brands generally yields higher gross profit margins than third-party branded merchandise, and helps to keep our product offerings current and unique.

Design

The ever-changing mix of Compensation Program

General

In furtheranceproducts available to our customers allows us to adapt our merchandise to prevailing fashion trends, and, together with the inviting atmosphere of our primary objective,stores, encourages our compensation programcore customers to visit our stores frequently.

We seek to select price points for our merchandise that are consistent with the spending patterns of our target customers. As such, our stores carry merchandise at a wide range of price points that may vary considerably within product categories.

Store Operations

We have organized our retail store operations by brand into geographic areas or districts, each with a district manager. District managers are responsible for several stores and monitor and supervise individual store managers. Each store manager is responsible for overseeing the daily operations of one of our stores. In addition to a store manager, the staff of a typical Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Terrain store includes a visual manager, several department managers and a full and part-time sales and visual staff. The staff of a typical Anthropologie store may also include a customer care manager who helps tailor the shopping experience to the needs of Anthropologie’s target customers. Our Free People retail stores include a store manager, a visual coordinator and full and part-time sales staff. A Terrain garden center may also include merchandise care and maintenance staff.

An essential requirement for the success of our stores is our ability to attract, train and retain talented, highly motivated store managers, visual managers and other key employees. In addition to management training programs for both newly hired and existing employees, we have a number of retention programs that offer qualitative and quantitative performance-based incentives to district-level managers, store-level managers and full-time sales associates.

Marketing and Promotion

We believe we have highly effective marketing tools in our catalogs and websites. We refresh this media as frequently as daily to reflect the most cutting edge changes in fashion and culture. We also believe that highly visible store locations, creative store design, broad merchandise selection and visual presentation are key enticements for customers to enter and explore our stores and buy merchandise. Consequently, we rely on these factors, as well as the brand recognition created by our direct marketing activities, to draw customers into our stores, rather than on traditional forms of advertising such as print, radio and television media. Marketing activities for each of our retail store concepts include special event promotions and a variety of public relations activities designed to motivate executives to maximize shareholder valuecreate community awareness of our stores and grow our brands, bothproducts. We also are increasingly active in the short-termburgeoning arena of social media and blogs. We believe that the long-term,traditional method of a one-way communication to customers is no longer enough. We believe that by rewarding executivesstarting a conversation and interacting directly with our customers, most notably via Facebook and Twitter, we are more effective at understanding and serving their fashion needs. We also believe that our blogs continue this conversation. Not only do we communicate what inspires us; it allows our customers to tell us what inspires them. This fosters our relationships with our customers and encourages them to continue shopping with us.

Suppliers

To serve our target customers and to recognize changes in fashion trends and seasonality, we purchase merchandise from numerous foreign and domestic vendors. To the extent that our vendors are located overseas or rely on overseas sources for doing so. These long standing compensation policies were designed and approved by management,a large portion of their merchandise, any event

causing a disruption of imports, such as the Compensation Committeeimposition of import restrictions, financial or political instability in any of the Board of Directors as appropriate. We have identified the first stepcountries in attaining these objectives as having superior executives in place, and as such, our compensation program’s initial purpose is to attract new candidates and retain the oneswhich goods we have. This requires our compensation to be competitivepurchase are manufactured, or trade restrictions in the marketplace. The other step in attainingform of tariffs or quotas, or both, could adversely affect our objectives is to reward these executives through annual performance-based compensation based on the achievementbusiness. During fiscal 2010, we did business with approximately 2,900 vendors. No single vendor accounted for more than 10.0% of specific operating goalsmerchandise purchased during that have been determined by the Compensation Committee based on recommendations by the Chairman of the Board (the “Chairman”) and Chief Executive Officer. Moreover, through equity-based compensation, we attempt to align the compensationtime. While certain of our executives with the interests of the shareholdersvendors have limited financial resources and motivate our executives to achieve the Company’s longer-term goals.

Long-Term versus Currently Paid Out Compensation

Current compensation paid to executive officers includes base salaries, which are paid periodically throughout the fiscal year, and performance bonuses, which are awarded at the end of the year. The Company’s long-term compensation has been comprised of stock options, a single restricted stock award made in fiscal year 2005, and two performance stock unit awards based on specific operating performance criteria made in fiscal year 2009. The Company has long believed that the characteristics of equity-based compensation, particularly the extended vesting periods, leverage and the deferral of taxation until exercise or vesting, are closely aligned with maximizing shareholder value and supporting its long-term growth strategies, and were favorable to the Company from both a cash flow and, prior to the adoption of FAS 123(R), an earnings statement perspective. The Company believes that the performance stock unit awards made in fiscal year 2009 share these characteristics and offer the potential for meaningful compensation for superior performance measured over an extended period of time.

The Company does not have deferred compensation plans or programs or executive retirement plans because it doesproduction capabilities, we do not believe that such plans are the best way to support its goalloss of maximizing shareholder value. Furthermore, the any one vendor would have a material effect on our business.

Company believes that there are regulatory and administrative costs involved with the administration of these plans that are not warranted by the benefits they provide. As a matter of practice and philosophy, the Company has significantly limited the scope and value of perquisites provided to executive officers.Operations

The Company’s compensation structure attempts to balance the ongoing cash requirements of the named executive officers for current income with the Company’s desire to create long-term incentives that are directly tied to growth in shareholder value. There is no pre-determined allocation between current and long-term compensation; the Compensation Committee maintains flexibility in this regard. Historically, however, equity compensation has provided the majority of income that named executives have derived from their employment with the Company. In recognition of this, the Compensation Committee takes the performance of the Company’s Common Shares (and therefore the perceived value of them to the executive) into consideration when making compensation decisions for each executive. Different positions may yield a different balance between cash and equity compensation in light of what the Compensation Committee decides will best further the Company’s objectives. For example, the brand divisional Presidents have maximum bonus potential that exceeds

base salary. This reflects the Company’s emphasis on the specific brand-related performance goals tied to the bonus for these particular executives. The Chief Executive Officer’s maximum bonus potential also exceeds base salary and is tied to overall sales and profitability metrics, while his performance stock unit grants are tied to overall profitability. For the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel, base salary exceeds the maximum bonus potential.Distribution. A significant portion of merchandise purchased by our retail businesses is shipped directly to our distribution center in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, which we own. In fiscal 2010 we completed construction on an additional 100,000 square feet of distribution space at this facility, bringing it to 291,000 square feet in size. This facility has an advanced computerized materials handling system and is approximately 65 miles from our home offices in Philadelphia.

In March 2005, we executed a long-term operating lease to utilize an additional 459,000 square foot fulfillment center located in Trenton, South Carolina. Currently, this facility houses the majority of merchandise distributed by our wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels. This building significantly expanded our fulfillment capacity and provides us with future opportunities for additional growth as it becomes necessary. This facility also utilizes a state-of-the-art and fully functional tilt tray sorter. The property currently accommodates all direct-to-consumer fulfillment related functions, including inventory warehousing, receiving, customer contact operations and customer shipping. We believe this space and equipment allows us to maximize our fulfillment efficiency. We can expand this space as needed to support the additional growth requirements of both officers’ bonus plansour retail and wholesale businesses.

In fiscal 2008 we executed a long-term lease to utilize a distribution center in Reno, Nevada, effectively relocating, expanding and bringing our west coast distribution service in-house. In March 2009 we executed an amendment to our long-term lease for an additional 39,000 square feet at this distribution center bringing it to 214,500 square feet in size. This facility services our stores in the western United States at a favorable freight cost per unit, and provides faster turnaround from selected vendors.

In addition, we have a distribution center in Essex, England, which is operated by a third party, to service our current and near-term needs for stores and direct-to-consumer operations in Europe.

Information Systems. Very early in our growth, we recognized the need for high-quality information in order to manage merchandise planning/buying, inventory management and control functions. We invested in a retail software package that met our processing and reporting requirements. We utilize point-of-sale register systems connected by a digital subscriber line (DSL) network to our home offices. These systems provide for register efficiencies, timely customer checkout and instant back office access to register information, as well as for daily updates of sales, inventory data and price changes. Our direct-to-consumer operations, which include the Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters catalogs and the Anthropologie, Free People, Urban Outfitters and Terrain retail web sites, maintain separate software systems that manage the merchandise and customer information for our in-house customer contact center and fulfillment functions. We launched a new, more functional web platform during fiscal 2008 that has expanded capacity for additional traffic and sales through the web. The Free People and Leifsdottir divisions within our wholesale segment use a

separate software system for customer service, order entry and allocations, production planning and inventory management. During fiscal 2007, we successfully completed installation of a wholesale customer service system that provides significantly improved functionality and flexibility to help serve our customers. This system has the capability to handle additional workload related to increased order volume and will better suit us over the long term to meet the wholesale segment’s growth needs. We have contracted with a nationally recognized company to provide disaster-recovery services with respect to our key systems.

During fiscal 2007, we also completed an upgrade of our existing point of sale platform at our North American locations. This upgrade included the replacement of our existing register software, replacement of registers and related hardware and the addition of radio frequency equipment to be utilized in the store receiving and operations areas. We believe this upgrade has allowed us to process customer transactions more quickly and efficiently. We believe this initiative has also resulted in advanced flexibility and customer service in the areas of locating inventory and accessing the direct-to-consumer channel within our retail stores. This new platform establishes better long-term technology resources and provides the infrastructure that enabled Anthropologie to implement a customer relationship management system during fiscal 2008.

During fiscal 2009, we successfully completed a warehousing software system implementation for our wholesale segment at our Trenton, South Carolina fulfillment center. The new software provides significantly improved scalability and functionality aligning with our business growth needs. We believe this upgrade will support our growth needs for the long-term. During fiscal 2011, we expect to complete phase one of our supply chain software project. This project will increase visibility for us and our vendors’ to merchandise within the supply chain process as well as provide for several other volume-based efficiencies.

During fiscal 2010, we began a warehousing software system implementation for our retail segment at our Lancaster County distribution center. The new software provides significantly improved reliability and functionality aligning with our business growth needs.

During fiscal 2010, we began work on an Order Management System that will significantly improve our ability to serve both our store and online customer and will provide for substantial improvements in our back office administration as it relates to supply chain, fulfillment and inventory control. Furthermore, it will integrate inventory visibility regardless of the channel in which it was received or sold. We expect phase one of this project to be complete in fiscal 2011. Phase I includes benefits such as a single consistent view of all purchase orders to our vendors regardless of business segment. Additionally, it provides for a standardized commercial invoicing that will be automatically matched to the purchase order.

Competition

The specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and the wholesale apparel businesses are tiedeach highly competitive. Our retail stores compete on the basis of, among other things, the location of our stores, the breadth, quality, style, and availability of merchandise, the level of customer service offered and merchandise price. Although we feel the eclectic mix of products offered in our retail stores helps differentiate us, it also means that our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain stores compete against a wide variety of smaller, independent specialty stores, as well as department stores and national specialty chains. Many of our competitors have substantially greater name recognition as well as financial, marketing and other resources. Our Anthropologie and Free People stores also face

competition from small boutiques that offer an individualized shopping experience similar to overall Companythe one we strive to provide to our target customers. In addition, some of our suppliers offer products directly to consumers and certain of our competitors.

Along with certain retail segment factors noted above, other key competitive factors for our direct-to-consumer operations include the success or effectiveness of customer mailing lists, response rates, catalog presentation, merchandise delivery and web site design and availability. Our direct-to-consumer operations compete against numerous catalogs and web sites, which may have a greater volume of circulation and web traffic.

Our Free People and Leifsdottir wholesale businesses compete with numerous wholesale companies based on the quality, fashion and price of our wholesale product offerings. Many of our wholesale business competitors’ products have a wider distribution network. In addition, certain of our wholesale competitors have greater name recognition and financial and other resources.

Trademarks and Service Marks

We are the registered owner in the United States of certain service marks and trademarks, including, but not limited to “Urban Outfitters”, “Anthropologie”, “Free People”, “Leifsdottir”, “Terrain”, “BDG Guaranteed Tough”, “Co-Operative”, “Deletta”, “Ecote”, “Eloise”, “Idra”, “Intimately Free People”, “Odille”, “Urban Renewal” and “Urbn.com”. Each mark is renewable indefinitely, contingent upon continued use at the time of renewal. In addition, we currently have pending registration applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office covering certain other marks. We also own marks that have been registered in foreign countries, and have applications for marks pending in additional foreign countries as well. We regard our marks as important to our business due to their name recognition with our customers. We are not aware of any valid claims of infringement or challenges to our right to use any of our marks in the United States.

Employees

As of January 31, 2010, we employed approximately 14,000 people, approximately 41.0% of whom were full-time employees. The number of part-time employees fluctuates depending on seasonal needs. Of our total employees, 2% work in the wholesale segment and the remaining 98% work in our retail segment. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe that our relations with our employees are excellent.

Financial Information about Operations

We aggregate our operations into two reportable segments, the retail segment and the wholesale segment. See Note 13, “Segment Reporting,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Financial Information about Geographical Areas

See Note 13, “Segment Reporting,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for information regarding net sales from domestic and foreign operations and long-lived assets.

Seasonality

Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. See Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Seasonality and Quarterly Results for additional information.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business segments are sensitive to economic conditions, consumer spending, shifts in fashion and industry and demographic conditions.

We are subject to seasonal variations and face numerous business risk factors. Consumer purchases of discretionary retail items and specialty retail products, including our products, may decline during recessionary periods and also may decline at other times when disposable income is lower. A prolonged economic downturn could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. There is a risk that consumer sentiment may decline due to economic and/or geo-political factors, which could negatively impact our financial position and results of operations.

Our performance is subject to worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of consumer spending remain uncertain and may remain depressed for the foreseeable future. Some of the factors impacting discretionary consumer spending include general economic conditions, wages and employment, consumer debt, reductions in net worth based on severe market declines, residential real estate and mortgage markets, taxation, fuel and energy prices, interest rates, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors. Consumer purchases of discretionary items, including our merchandise, generally decline during recessionary periods and other periods where disposable income is adversely affected. The recent downturn in the economy may continue to affect consumer purchases of our merchandise and adversely impact our results of operations and continued growth. The economic conditions may also affect the number of specialty retail businesses and their ability to purchase merchandise from our wholesale segment. It is difficult to predict how long the current uncertain economic, capital and credit market conditions will continue and what impact they will have on our business.

We rely heavily on our ability to identify changes in fashion.

Customer tastes and fashion trends are volatile and can change rapidly. Our success depends in part on our ability to effectively predict and respond to changing fashion tastes and consumer demands, and to translate market trends into appropriate, saleable product offerings. Our inability to effectively determine these changes may lead to higher seasonal inventory levels and a future need to increase markdowns to liquidate our inventory. Compared to our retail segment, our wholesale segment is more sensitive to changes in fashion trends because of longer lead times in the manufacture and sale of its apparel. Our fashion decisions constitute a material risk and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be successful in expanding our business and opening new retail stores.

Our growth strategy depends on our ability to open and operate new retail stores on a profitable basis. Our operating complexity will increase as our store base grows, and we may face challenges in managing our future growth. Such growth will require that we continue to expand and improve our operating capabilities, and expand, train and manage our employee base. We may be unable to hire and train a sufficient number of qualified personnel or successfully manage our growth. Our expansion prospects also depend on a number of other factors, many of which are beyond our control, including, among other things, competition, the availability of financing for capital expenditures and working capital requirements, the availability of suitable sites for new store locations on acceptable lease terms,

and the availability of inventory. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve our store expansion goals, nor can there be any assurance that our newly opened stores will achieve revenue or profitability levels comparable to those of our existing stores in the time periods estimated by us, or at all. If our stores fail to achieve, or are unable to sustain, acceptable revenue and profitability levels, we may incur significant costs associated with closing those stores.

Existing and increased competition in the specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and wholesale apparel businesses may reduce our net revenues, profits and market share.

The specialty retail, direct-to-consumer and the wholesale apparel businesses are each highly competitive. Our retail stores compete on the basis of, among other things, the location of our stores, the breadth, quality, style, and availability of merchandise, the level of customer service offered and merchandise price. Our Anthropologie and Free People stores also face competition from small boutiques that offer an individualized shopping experience similar to the one we strive to provide to our target customers. In addition, some of our suppliers offer products directly to consumers and certain of our competitors. Our Free People and Leifsdottir wholesale businesses compete with numerous wholesale companies based on the quality, fashion and price of our wholesale product offerings, many of whose products have wider distribution than ours. Many of our competitors have substantially greater name recognition as well as financial, marketing and other resources. We cannot assure you that we will continue to be able to compete successfully against existing or future competitors. Due to difficult economic conditions our competitors may force a markdown or promotional sales environment which could hurt our ability to achieve our historical profit margins. Our expansion into markets served by our competitors and entry of new competitors or expansion of existing competitors into our markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain or replace these employees or recruit additional qualified personnel, which would harm our business.

We believe that we have benefited substantially from the leadership and experience of our senior executives, including our Chairman, President and co-founder, Richard A. Hayne, and our Chief Executive Officer, Glen T. Senk. The loss of the services of any of our senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects, as we may not be able to find suitable management personnel to replace departing executives on a timely basis. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Hayne, Mr. Senk or any of our other key personnel. In addition, as our business expands, we believe that our future success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. There is a high level of competition for personnel in the retail industry. Our inability to meet our staffing requirements in the future could impair our ability to increase revenue and could otherwise harm our business.

We could be materially and adversely affected if any of our distribution centers are closed.

We operate four distribution facilities worldwide to support our retail and wholesale business segments in the United States, Western Europe and Canada, and for fulfillment of catalog and web site orders. The merchandise purchased for our United States and Canadian retail operation is shipped directly to our distribution centers in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and Reno, Nevada while merchandise purchased for our direct-to-consumer and wholesale operations is shipped directly to our

fulfillment center in Trenton, South Carolina. The merchandise purchased for our Western Europe retail and direct-to-consumer operations is shipped to Essex, England. If any of our distribution centers were to close for any reason, the other distribution centers may not be able to support the resulting additional distribution demands. As a result, we could incur significantly higher costs and longer lead times associated with distributing our products to our stores during the time it takes for us to re-open or replace the center.

We rely significantly on foreign sources of production.

We receive a substantial portion of our apparel and other merchandise from foreign sources, both purchased directly in foreign markets and indirectly through domestic vendors with foreign sources. To the extent that our vendors are located overseas or rely on overseas sources for a large portion of their products, any event causing a disruption of imports, including the imposition of import restrictions, war, acts of terrorism and natural disasters could adversely affect our business. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be adversely affected. The flow of merchandise from our vendors could also be adversely affected by financial or political instability in any of the countries in which the goods we purchase are manufactured, if the instability affects the production or export of merchandise from those countries. Trade restrictions in the form of tariffs or quotas, or both, applicable to the products we sell could also affect the importation of those products and could increase the cost and reduce the supply of products available to us. In addition, decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could increase the cost of products we purchase from overseas vendors.

Our operating results fluctuate from period to period.

Our business experiences seasonal fluctuations in net sales and operating income, with a more significant portion of operating income typically realized during the five-month period from August 1 to December 31 of each year (the back-to-school and holiday periods). Any decrease in sales or margins during this period, or in the availability of working capital needed in the months preceding this period, could have a more material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations than in other periods. Seasonal fluctuations also affect our inventory levels, as we usually order merchandise in advance of peak selling periods and sometimes before new fashion trends are confirmed by customer purchases. We must carry a significant amount of inventory, especially before the back-to-school and holiday selling periods. If we are not successful in selling our inventory during this period, we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of the inventory or we may not be able to sell the inventory at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be unable to protect our trademarks and other intellectual property rights.

We believe that our trademarks and service marks are important to our success and our competitive position due to their name recognition with our customers. We devote substantial resources to the establishment and protection of our trademarks and service marks on a worldwide basis. We are not aware of any valid claims of infringement or challenges to our right to use any of our trademarks and service marks in the United States. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the actions we have taken to establish and protect our trademarks and service marks will be adequate to

prevent imitation of our products by others or to prevent others from seeking to block sales of our products as a violation of the trademarks, service marks and intellectual property of others. Also, others may assert rights in, or ownership of, trademarks and other intellectual property of ours and we may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries may not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

War, acts of terrorism, or the threat of either may negatively impact availability of merchandise and/or otherwise adversely impact our business.

In the event of war or acts of terrorism, or if either are threatened, our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale in our stores may be negatively impacted. A substantial portion of our merchandise is imported from other countries, see “We rely significantly on foreign sources of production”on page 13. If commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and stores, as well as fulfilling catalog and web site orders. In the event of war or acts of terrorism, or the threat of either, we may be required to suspend operations in some or all of our stores, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be successful in introducing additional store concepts.

We may, from time to time, seek to develop and introduce new concepts or brands in addition to our existing Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People, Leifsdottir and Terrain brands. Our ability to succeed in these new concepts could require significant capital expenditures and management attention. Additionally, any new concept is subject to certain risks, including customer acceptance, competition, product differentiation, challenges relating to economies of scale in merchandise sourcing and the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, including management and designers. There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop and grow these or any other new concepts to a point where they will become profitable, or generate positive cash flow. If we cannot successfully develop and grow these new concepts, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted.

We may develop new store concepts through acquisitions and we may not be successful in integrating those acquisitions.

Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the diversion of our management’s attention from other business concerns, the possibility that current operating and financial systems and controls may be inadequate to deal with our growth and the potential loss of key employees.

We also may encounter difficulties in integrating any businesses we may acquire with our existing operations. The success of these transactions depends on our ability to:

successfully merge corporate cultures and operational and financial systems;

realize cost reduction synergies; and

as necessary, retain key management members and technical personnel of acquired companies.

In addition, there may be liabilities that we fail, or are unable, to discover in the course of performing due diligence investigations on any company that we may acquire, or have recently

acquired. Also, there may be additional costs relating to acquisitions including, but not limited to, possible purchase price adjustments. Any of our rights to indemnification from sellers to us, even if obtained, may not be enforceable, collectible or sufficient in amount, scope or duration to fully offset the possible liabilities associated with the business or property acquired. Any such liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Our internet sales are subject to operational risk.

We sell merchandise over the Internet through our web sites. Our Internet operations are subject to numerous risks, including reliance on third party computer hardware/software, rapid technological change, diversion of sales from our stores, liability for online content, violations of state or federal laws, including those relating to online privacy, credit card fraud, risks related to the failure of the computer systems that operate our websites and their related support systems, including computer viruses, telecommunications failures and electronic break-ins and similar disruptions. If our websites were disrupted for any material length of time for the reasons described above or any other reasons, our sales and profitability metrics rather than those of specific brands because their responsibilities are generally more company-wide than brand-based. The different elements of compensation are discussed more fully below in “Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elementsmay suffer. There is no assurance that our Internet operations will continue to Primary Compensation Objectives.”

In the beginning of fiscal year 2009, citing his ownership of a substantial number of Common Shares of the Companyachieve sales and his confidence in the Company’s future performance, the Chairman requested that his base salary be set at $1.00 per year, and the Compensation Committee honored his request. This change in base salary reduced his overall compensation and, as a result, he is not considered a named executive officer for fiscal year 2009. The Chairman remained eligible to receive a performance bonus in fiscal year 2009, and he received $300,000 of his maximum bonus potential of $600,000.profitability growth.

Operation and ProcessManufacturer compliance with our social compliance program requirements.

Compensation Committee

The Company’s Compensation Committee, acting pursuant to its charter, sets the amount of each element of compensation for each named executive officer. The Compensation Committee generally holds meetings at least four timesWe have a year, and compensation amounts for executive officers for the new fiscal year are generally set in the Company’s first fiscal quarter. In fiscal year 2009 there were five meetings of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committeecompliance program that is comprised of three members, Scott A. Belair (who is the committee’s chairman), Joel S. Lawson III, and Robert H. Strouse. All members are “independent” directors, as defined by the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Compensation Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website (www.urbanoutfittersinc.com), under “Financial Overview—Corporate Governance.” The charter is reviewed by the Compensation Committeemonitored on an annual basis by our buying offices. Our production facilities are either certified as in compliance with our program, or areas of improvement are identified and revised as warranted.

Compensation Committee Consultant

The Compensation Committee directly engages PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as a compensation consultantcorrective follow-up action is taken. All manufacturing facilities are required to provide advice on executive compensation matters, and it has performed such duties in Fiscal 2009. The committee and the Board of Directors have discretion to hire and fire the consultant, as described in the Compensation Committee’s Charter. The committee determines the scope of the consultant’s review. In fiscal year 2009, the committee asked the consultant to review the elements of the Chief Executive Officer’s and other named executive officers’ compensation programs,follow applicable national labor laws, as well as international compliance standards regarding workplace safety, such as standards that require clean and safe working environments, clearly marked exits and paid overtime. We believe in protecting the safety and working rights of the people who produce the goods sold in our stores and through our wholesale business, while recognizing and respecting cultural and legal differences found throughout the world. We require our outside vendors to meetregister through an online website and agree that they and their suppliers will abide by certain standards and conditions of employment.

Our investments in auction rate securities are subject to risks which may affect the liquidity of these investments and could cause an impairment charge.

Approximately 4.5% of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested in “A” or better rated Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) that represent interests in municipal and student loan related collateralized debt obligations, all of which are guaranteed by either government agencies and/or insured by private insurance agencies up to 97% or greater of par value. Historically, investments in ARS have been highly liquid, however, if an auction for the securities we own fails, the investments may not be readily convertible. Liquidity for ARS is typically provided by an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually 7, 28, 35 or 90 days. The principal associated with failed auctions will not be available until either a successful auction occurs, the bond is called by the issuer, a buyer is found from outside the auction process or the debt obligation reaches its maturity. Our ARS had a par value of $37.6 million and a fair value of $33.5 million as of January 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2010 all of our ARS have failed to liquidate at auction due to lack of market demand. Based on review of credit quality, collateralization, final stated maturity, estimates of the probability of being called or becoming liquid prior to final maturity,

redemptions of similar ARS, previous market activity for same investment security, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and valuation models, we have recorded a $4.1 million temporary impairment on our ARS as of January 31, 2010. To date, we have collected all interest receivable on outstanding ARS when due and have not been informed by the issuers that accrued interest payments are currently at risk. We do not have the intent to sell the underlying securities prior to their recovery and we believe it is not likely that we will be required to sell the underlying securities prior to their anticipated recovery of full amortized cost. We cannot assure that further impairment to our ARS will not occur.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

We have no outstanding comments with the Compensation Committeestaff of the SEC.

Item 2. Properties

Since 2006, our home office has been located in several buildings on July 28, 2008. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP sends its invoices for consulting services directly to the Compensation Committee, which reviews the invoices and then forwards them to the Company for payment.

Role of Executive Officers in Establishing Compensation

The Compensation Committee is solely responsible for compensation determinations and compensation policies applicable to executive officers and as otherwise providedone campus in the Compensation Committee Charter. Nonehistoric core of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman or any other executive officer makes any such determinations or set any such policies.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Navy Yard. The Compensation Committee does consult withconsolidated offices at the ChairmanNavy yard allow for an efficient operation of our Philadelphia-based offices and will help to support our growth needs for the Chief Executive Officer in determining compensation levelsforeseeable future. We currently occupy approximately 282,000 square feet at the Navy Yard and hold options on several adjacent buildings that are available for each named executive officer,at least the next ten years to allow for additional expansion if necessary. The expenditures to improve our Navy Yard facilities were capitalized and are being depreciated based on the committee takes their assessmentuseful life of the performanceimprovements and fixtures. In fiscal 2010, we have begun a 54,000 square foot expansion of our home office. We expect this expansion to be complete in fiscal 2011.

Our customer contact center is located in Trenton, South Carolina as part of our 459,000 square foot distribution center, and occupies approximately 16,000 square feet. We occupy two offices in Europe including approximately 6,900 square feet of space at 24 Market Place in London and approximately 3,500 square feet of space at 24-26 West Street in London. Our home offices and customer contact facilities are leased properties with varying lease term expirations through 2016. We own a 291,000 square foot distribution center in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. During fiscal 2008 we entered into an operating lease for a warehouse facility in Reno, Nevada and amended this lease for additional space in 2009. The facility is approximately 214,500 square feet and is primarily used to support our western United States stores. During fiscal 2008 we invested approximately $6 million in equipment and other improvements for this location. The term of this lease is set to expire in 2017 with Company options to renew for up to an additional ten years. Our distribution centers support our retail segment, with our Trenton, South Carolina facility also supporting the majority of our merchandise distributed by our wholesale segment.

Improvements in recent years, including those in fiscal 2010 described in Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis-Liquidity and Capital Resources, were necessary to adequately support our growth. We believe we may need to further expand the square footage of our home office and distribution facilities to support our growth over the next several years. For more information on our distribution center properties, see Item 1: Business—Company Operations—Distribution. We believe that our facilities are well maintained and in good operating condition.

All of our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain stores are leased, well maintained and in good operating condition. Our retail stores are typically leased for a term of ten years with renewal options for an additional five to ten years. Total estimated selling square feet for stores open, under lease at January 31, 2010, by Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain was approximately 1,234,000, 1,000,000, 47,000 and 20,000, respectively. Terrain also utilizes two acres of outdoor space to sell seasonal, live plants, accessories and outdoor furniture. The average store selling square feet is approximately 9,000 for Urban Outfitters, 7,400 for Anthropologie and 1,400 for Free People. Selling square feet can sometimes change due to floor moves, use of staircases, cash register configuration and other factors. The following table shows the location of each of the executive officers into consideration when weighing the factors and setting compensation. The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer, and Chief Talent Officer may attend portionsour existing retail stores, as of certain meetings of the committee as needed.

The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer have the primary role in making recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding the assessment and design of programs, plans and awards. They are assisted by the General Counsel, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Administrative Officer, the Chief Talent Officer, and the Executive Director of Finance, who provide them with information and input on these items.

Elements of Compensation

The Company’s compensation program is comprised of three main elements: (1) base salary, (2) performance bonus and (3) equity-based incentives, including stock options and performance stock units.January 31, 2010:

Selection of Elements

The Compensation Committee has chosen to utilize base salary, performance bonus and equity-based incentives because it believes such a compensation package, taken as a whole, is both competitive in the marketplace and reflects directly on the Company’s primary objective of maximizing shareholder value and growing its brands. The rationale for the selection of each particular element is discussed in detail below.

Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives

The Compensation Committee reviews the amounts payable to each executive under each individual element of compensation, as well as the aggregate amount of compensation to such executive, in making compensation decisions.

Base Salaries

Base salary is determined by position, experience and competitive market factors for comparable talent. Inasmuch as the main objective of the compensation plan is maximizing shareholder value, the Company generally seeks to set base salaries at or near prevailing market rates for comparable levels of responsibility in specialty retail so as to reduce the levels of committed compensation expense on the Company’s financial statements as well as the cash cost to the Company. The Company believes that it needs to offer competitive base salaries in order to retain and attract superior personnel, which is a key step in achieving its primary objectives. For fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee decided to maintain executive officer salaries at fiscal year 2009 levels, primarily due to the current economic downturn and resulting market conditions.

Performance Bonuses

The Company’s executive officers are eligible to receive cash incentive bonuses under the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan based on the achievement of specific performance targets established in advance. In determining performance objectives, the Compensation Committee sets forth specific targets that are consistent with its primary objectives. We believe that this plan presents the executive with clear objectives that, if achieved, will maximize shareholder value and further the growth of our brands, while providing commensurate rewards to the executive.

Eligibility

The Compensation Committee determines executive officer eligibility for performance bonuses during the Company’s first fiscal quarter based on the Company’s financial budgets and operating plans and the roles that the executives have in achieving those objectives.

Setting Performance Criteria and Targets

The Compensation Committee sets the performance criteria for each participant during the Company’s first fiscal quarter. The criteria may be based on the performance of the participant, a division, the Company as a whole or a subsidiary of the Company, at the committee’s discretion. Performance criteria may include, depending on the particular participant: sales, profit, return on sales, net operating profit after taxes, investment turnover, customer service indices, funds from operations, income from operations, return on assets, return on net assets, asset turnover, return on equity, return on capital, market price appreciation of shares, economic value added, total shareholder return, net income, pre-tax income, earnings per share, operating profit margin, net income margin, sales margin, cash flow, market share, inventory turnover, sales growth, net revenue growth, capacity utilization, new stores opened, customer penetration, increase in customer base, net income growth, expense control and hiring of personnel. The Compensation Committee determines performance criteria that are appropriate for each participant. The committee may also take into account the opinion of the named executive officer as to which criteria

he or she feels is the best indicator of his or her performance. The Compensation Committee, in connection with its assessment of performance criteria for fiscal year 2009, concluded that the criteria or targets do not encourage or promote inappropriate risk-taking by the participants.

Specifically, the Compensation Committee sets criteria based on whether the executive officer has merchant responsibility. The primary criteria for the Chief Executive Officer may include sales, operating profit, stores opened, return on capital, management of inventory levels, hiring goals or other goals determined by the committee. Typically, the primary criteria of the performance bonus plans for executives with merchant responsibilities, such as President of Urban Outfitters Brand or President of Free People Brand, would be sales and operating profits, number of new stores opened, customer penetration, management of inventory levels or other goals determined by the committee. For executive officers who do not have merchant responsibilities, such as the Chief Financial Officer and the General Counsel, the criteria generally include sales and operating profits goals, meeting or exceeding functional area budgets, functional area performance ratings, the number and timing of store openings or other goals determined by the committee.

Each performance criterion is then assigned a performance target. For example, for the criterion of “number of new stores opened,” the target would be the Company’s goal for a specified number of stores opened, consistent with the operating budget and with the brand growth strategies. Or, for the criterion of “sales and operating profits,” the target would be meeting or exceeding the Company’s financial “budget” for the fiscal year, or by meeting or exceeding “stretch” goals for the fiscal year. The thresholds for the functional area budgets are determined by the operating budget and its goal of leveraging selling, general and administrative expenses as top line revenue grows, and those for functional area performance ratings are driven by the brands’ or the Chief Executive Officer’s assessments of the functional areas.

Finally, the Compensation Committee establishes a schedule or matrix for each participant showing the maximum performance bonus (expressed as a percentage of base salary) payable for the achievement of the specified performance target. The specific amounts for each performance target are determined by assessing the profit contribution attained by meeting various targets, and measuring the compensation outcomes achieved by meeting those targets, while taking into account total compensation from base salary, bonus and stock options. The performance targets and the percentage of performance bonus subject to each performance objective for the Company’s named executive officers in fiscal year 2009 are described below in “—Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses.

Role of Named Executive Officers in Determining Performance FactorsStores

With respect to the performance bonus factors of all named executive officers, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Administrative Officer make recommendations to the Compensation Committee, which it considers when setting the performance bonus plans. None of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer, or the Chief Administrative Officer has the authority to call Compensation Committee meetings or set meeting agendas themselves nor do they meet with the compensation consultant on an individual basis without the consent of the Compensation Committee or its Chairman.

Measuring Achievement; Payment of Bonuses

At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee determines the extent of achievement of the pre-established performance targets for each criterion. The level of achievement attained is applied to the schedule to determine the individual’s adjusted performance bonus percentage, which is then multiplied by the individual’s award. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to award that amount or reduce the award payable if it believes such action would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. At the end of a year, the Compensation Committee also has the ability to grant cash bonuses to non-named executive officers.

In Fiscal 2009, the Company met its goal of growing sales by more than 20% and profit by more than 25%, and its goal of meeting or exceeding its sales plan, but did not meet its goal of meeting or exceeding its profit plan. The Company did achieve its objectives for the number and timing of store openings. Overall, named executive officers realized 48.6% of their maximum achievable performance bonuses, with a range of 28% to 70% of maximum achievable bonus.

Set forth in the table below are the performance targets and the percentage of performance bonus subject to each performance objective for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the President of Urban Outfitters Brand, the President of Free People Brand and the General Counsel.

For fiscal year 2009, a portion of each named executive officer’s bonus is tied to two different measures of Company-wide sales and profit targets. The first measure is based on whether net sales for specified stores were increased from the prior year by at least 20% (the “Sales Percentage Target”) and whether profit (i.e. income from operations) was increased from the prior year by at least 25% for specified stores (the “Profit Percentage Target”). The second measure is based on whether the Company’s net sales for specified stores meet or exceed the specified dollar of approximately $1.8 billion (the “Sales Plan Target”) and whether the Company’s profit for specified stores meets or exceeds the specified dollar amount of approximately $318.5 million (the “Profit Plan Target”). Each named executive officer also has his or her own additional performance criteria, selected by the Compensation Committee based on the methodology described above in “—Setting Performance Criteria and Targets.”

Glen T. Senk – Chief Executive Officer

Bonus Criteria

Percent of Total Bonus
Potential

Company meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target(1)

50

Company meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

25

Company exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and Profit Plan Target by more than 5%(2)

25
100

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet or exceed the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.

John E. Kyees – Chief Financial Officer

Bonus Criteria

Percent of Total Bonus
Potential

Company meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target(1)

20

Company meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

30

Individual Goals(3)

50
100

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.

(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.
(3)These four individual goals include (i) meeting or exceeding a target percentage for reducing “shrink” (i.e. the amount of inventory lost as a result of theft or damage); (ii) planning and executing the expansion of a distribution center; (iii) managing all operational areas of responsibility, which is further broken down to include (A) for the call center, the achievement of specified service levels and functioning at or below the call center budget, (B) for the distribution and fulfillment function, the achievement of specified service levels and meeting budget requirements, (C) for the finance function, the successful completion of financial reports on time and accurately, as well as meeting its budget requirements, and (D) for the loss prevention function, the achievement of specified target levels for loss prevention/merchandise control and operating within budget; and (iv) achieving a tax rate of 36% or better. Mr. Kyees attained each of these individual goals. The Compensation Committee expected that these individual goals would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

Tedford G. Marlow – President, Urban Outfitters Brand

Bonus Criteria(1)

Maximum Percent of Total
Bonus Potential

Company meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target and Urban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(2)(3)

20 

Company exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and Urban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(4)

20 %(3)

Company exceeds Profit Plan Target by more than 5% and Urban Outfitters Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(5)

40 

Individual Goals(6)

20 
100 

(1)The executive’s bonus criteria are broken down into both “budget” and “stretch” goals. This table includes the “stretch” goals and the maximum bonus potential if each “stretch” goal is met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, the Company’s actual net sales increased by more than 20% and the Company’s actual profit increased by more than 25%. Actual Urban Outfitters Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by more than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by more than 5%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.
(3)In setting the fiscal year 2009 objectives, the Compensation Committee believed that exceeding the Urban Outfitters Brand sales plan target by more than 2% and profit plan target by more than 5% would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance. This difficulty was magnified by the adverse impact of economic conditions in the fourth fiscal quarter.
(4)By achieving actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion, the Company did not exceed its Sales Plan Target by more than 2%. Therefore, Mr. Marlow did not satisfy the “stretch” goal indicated in this row. However, the Company did exceed its Sales Plan Target by less than 2% which allowed him to meet his applicable “budget” goal. Accordingly he received a payment equal to 10% of his maximum potential bonus for this performance objective.

(5)By achieving actual profit of approximately $309.8 million, the Company did not meet or exceed its Profit Plan Target. Therefore, Mr. Marlow was not able to meet his “stretch” or “budget” goal for this performance objective and he did not receive the applicable bonus.
(6)These three individual goals are related to the Urban Outfitters Brand and include (i) improving the average dollar inventory turn by a minimum period of time versus the previous year; (ii) increasing the penetration of Urban Outfitters own brand apparel to a specified demographic market; and (iii) increasing profitability in a specified geographic market. Mr. Marlow was able to achieve goals (i) and (ii), and therefore he received a payment equal to 13.4% of his maximum bonus potential for this goal. The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Marlow’s individual goals to be challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

Margaret Hayne – President, Free People Brand

Bonus Criteria(1)

 

Maximum Percent of Total
Bonus Potential

Company meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage Target and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(2)(3)LOCATION

  20

Company exceeds Sales Plan Target by more than 2% and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(4)LOCATION

  20

Company exceeds Profit Plan Target by more than 5% and Free People Brand exceeds its sales plan target by more than 2% and/or its profit plan target by more than 5%(3)(5)LOCATION

  40

LOCATION

Individual GoalsAlabama

Birmingham

(6)Arizona

Tempe

Tucson

Scottsdale

California

Berkeley

Burbank

Costa Mesa

Fresno

Glendale

Irvine

Los Angeles

Melrose Ave.

Cahuenga Blvd

Newport Beach

Pasadena

Rancho Cucamonga

Roseville

Sacramento

Santa Cruz

San Diego

Fifth Avenue

Hillcrest

San Francisco

Powell St.

Fillmore St.

San José

San Luis Obispo

Santa Barbara

Santa Monica

Simi Valley

Studio City

Thousand Oaks

Torrance

Ventura

Walnut Creek

Westwood

Colorado

Boulder

Denver

Lone Tree

Connecticut

New Haven

Florida

Jacksonville

Miami

Miami Beach

Orlando

Palm Beach Gardens

South Miami

Tampa

Georgia

Atlanta

Peachtree Rd.

Ponce DeLeon Ave

Savannah

  20

Idaho

Boise

Illinois

Champaign

Chicago

Clark St.

North Rush St.

South State St.

Milwaukee Ave.

Evanston

Oak Brook

Schaumburg

Indiana

Bloomington

Kansas

Lawrence

Louisiana

Baton Rouge

New Orleans

Maryland

Baltimore

Massachusetts

Allston

Boston

Newbury St.

Faneuil Hall

Cambridge

Dedham

Northampton

Michigan

Ann Arbor

East Lansing

Troy

Minnesota

Bloomington

Minneapolis

Missouri

Kansas City

St. Louis

Nebraska

Omaha

Nevada

Las Vegas

Desert Passage

Mandalay Bay

New Jersey

Cherry Hill

Edison

Montclair

Paramus

Red Bank

  

100New Mexico

Albuquerque

 

(1)

New York

Cheektowaga

Garden City

Ithaca

New York

Chelsea

The East Side

Midtown

SoHo

Queens

The West Side

The Upper West Side

Brooklyn

North Carolina

Asheville

Charlotte

Durham

Ohio

Cincinnati

Columbus

Westlake

Oregon

Portland

Tigard

Pennsylvania

Ardmore

King of Prussia

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

University City

Rhode Island

Providence

South Carolina

Charleston

Tenessee

Nashville

Texas

Austin

Dallas

Northpark Center

East Mockingbird Lane

Houston

University Blvd.

The Galleria

San Antonio

Spring

Utah

Salt Lake City

Vermont

Burlington

The executive’s bonus criteria are broken down into both “budget” and “stretch” goals. This table includes the “stretch” goals and the maximum bonus potential if each “stretch” goal is met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, the Company’s actual net sales increased by more than 20% and the Company’s actual profit increased by more than 25%. Actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by less than 5%. Accordingly, the performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective, which she did.
(3)In setting the fiscal year 2009 objectives, the Compensation Committee believed that exceeding the Free People Brand sales plan target by more than 2% and profit plan target by more than 5% would be very challenging and achievable only through outstanding performance. This difficulty was magnified by the adverse impact of economic conditions in the fourth fiscal quarter.
(4)By achieving actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion, the Company exceeded its Sales Plan Target but did not exceed it by more than 2%. In addition, actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan by less than 5%. Due to these results, Ms. Hayne’s performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne received half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective.
(5)Actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan by less than 5%. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective. However, by achieving actual profit of approximately $309.8 million, the Company did not exceed its Profit Plan Target, and therefore, she did not receive a bonus for this performance objective.

Virginia

Charlottesville

McLean

Richmond

Washington

Seattle

Broadway East

Fifth Ave

University Way

Lynnwood

Washington D.C.

Chinatown

Georgetown

Wisconsin

Madison

Milwaukee

Canada

Kingston

Montréal

Catherine St.

St. Denis St.

Toronto

Yonge St.

Queen St.

Vancouver

West Edmonton

England

Birmingham

Bristol

Leeds

Liverpool

London

Kent

Kensington High St.

Oxford St.

Covent Garden

Manchester

Ireland

Dublin

Cecilia St.

Dundrum

Belfast

Scotland

Edinburgh

Glasgow

Denmark

Copenhagen

Sweden

Stockholm

Belgium

Antwerp

Germany

Hamburg

(6)These four individual goals are related to the Free People Brand and include (i) launching a specific line under the Free People Brand and achieving a specific annual sales goal for that new line; (ii) launching another specific line under the Free People Brand and achieving a specific annual sales goal for that new line; (iii) successfully launching a website relating to the Free People Brand; and (iv) achieving an international sales goal for the Free People Brand. For the performance objective listed in this row, amounts payable to Ms. Hayne are dependent on actual Free People Brand net sales and profit and individual goals. Due to the fact that actual Free People Brand net sales exceeded the applicable sales plan target by less than 2% and actual profit exceeded the applicable profit plan target by less than 5%, the performance objective for the “stretch” goal was not met, but the performance objective for the “budget” goal was met. Therefore, Ms. Hayne was eligible to receive half of her maximum potential bonus for this performance objective. With respect to individual goals, she achieved goals (i), (ii) and (iii). As a result, she received a payment equal to 7.5% of her maximum bonus potential. The Compensation Committee believed Ms. Hayne’s individual goals were very challenging and achievable only through outstanding performance.

Glen Bodzy – Secretary and General Counsel

Bonus CriteriaAnthropologie Stores

 

LOCATION

LOCATION

LOCATION

LOCATION

Alabama

Birmingham

Huntsville

Arizona

Mesa

Scottsdale

Fashion Square

Kierland Commons

Tucson

California

Berkeley

Beverly Hills

Burlingame

Carlsbad

Carmel

Chula Vista

Corona

Corte Madera

Danville

El Segundo

Fresno

Glendale

Irvine

Los Angeles

Newport Beach

Pasadena

Palo Alto

Rancho Cucamonga

Roseville

San Diego

La Jolla Village

Fashion Valley

San Francisco

San José

Santa Barbara

Santa Monica

Simi Valley

Thousand Oaks

Torrance

Colorado

Boulder

Denver

Cherry Creek

Lone Tree

Connecticut

Westport

Greenwich

South Windsor

Florida

Boca Raton

Coral Gables

Jacksonville

Miami

Miami Beach

Naples

Orlando

Palm Beach Gardens

Tampa

West Palm Beach

Georgia

Atlanta

Dunwoody

Idaho

Boise

Illinois

Chicago

108 N. State St.

1120 N. State St.

Southport Ave.

Geneva

Highland Park

Oak Brook

Schaumburg

Skokie

Indiana

Indianapolis

Louisiana

Baton Rouge

Maryland

Annapolis

Rockville

Towson

Massachusetts

Boston

Burlington

Chestnut Hill

Dedham

Natick

Michigan

Birmingham

Troy

Minnesota

Maple Grove

Minneapolis

St. Louis Park

Mississippi

Ridgeland

Missouri

Kansas City

St. Louis

Nebraska

Omaha

Nevada

Henderson

Las Vegas

New Jersey

Edgewater

Marlton

Montclair

North Brunswick

Princeton

Short Hills

Shrewsbury

Woodcliff Lake

New Mexico

Albuquerque

New York

Garden City

Greenvale

New York

Union Square

SoHo

Rockefeller Center

Victor

White Plains

North Carolina

Charlotte

Northlake Mall

SouthPark Mall

Durham

Greensboro

Ohio

Cincinnati

Columbus

Woodmere

Oregon

Portland

Tigard

Pennsylvania

Glen Mills

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

Wayne

South Carolina

Myrtle Beach

Tennessee

Nashville

Texas

Austin

Dallas

Highland Park Village

NorthPark Center

Houston

CityCentre

Westheimer Rd.

Plano

San Antonio

Southlake

Spring

Utah

Salt Lake City

Virginia

Charlottesville

McLean

Reston

Richmond

Washington

Bellevue

Seattle

Fifth Ave.

University Village

Washington D.C.

Georgetown

Wisconsin

Madison

Milwaukee

Canada

Edmonton

Toronto

Don Mills

Yorkville Ave

England

London

Free People Stores

LOCATION

LOCATION

LOCATION

California

Cahuenga

Carlsbad

Canoga Park

Glendale

Los Angeles

Manhattan Beach

Palo Alto

San Antonio

Santa Monica

Torrance

Walnut Creek

Connecticut

Greenwich

Illinois

Chicago

1464 N Milwaukee Ave.

1401 N Milwaukee Ave.

Highland Park

New Jersey

Paramus

Short Hills

New York

Brooklyn

Garden City

New York

Fifth Ave.

Third Ave.

Spring St.

Oregon

Portland

Pennsylvania

Ardmore

King of Prussia

Massachusetts

Boston

Burlington

Dedham

Texas

Austin

Dallas

Virginia

Arlington

McLean

Washington

Bellevue

Seattle

Terrain Garden Center

LOCATION

   Percent of Total Bonus
Potential
 

Company meets Sales Percentage Target and Profit Percentage TargetPennsylvania(1)

Glen Mills

  20 

Company meets Sales Plan Target and Profit Plan Target(2)

  30 

Individual Goals(3)

50 
100 

(1)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales increased by more than 20% and actual profit increased by more than 25%. Accordingly, this performance objective was met.
(2)In fiscal year 2009, actual net sales of approximately $1.83 billion exceeded the Sales Plan Target, but actual profit of approximately $309.8 million did not meet the Profit Plan Target. Accordingly, this performance objective was not met.
(3)These three individual goals include (i) opening at least 45 stores in fiscal year 2009; (ii) opening a specific number of those stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009; and (iii) entering fiscal year 2010 with a targeted number of signed leases. Mr. Bodzy was able to attain all of these individual goals. The Compensation Committee considered the target for maximum fourth quarter store openings and overall lease signings to be very challenging and achievable only through superior performance.

The Company did not modify any performance targets during Fiscal 2009In addition to reflect changes in the financial budgets or goals upon which the performance targets and awards were based. If the Company were to change such financial budgets in the future, however, the Compensation Committee would have discretion to adjust bonus awards accordingly where it believes it is warranted in light of the objectives of the compensation program.

The Compensation Committee is currently in the process of determining performance targets and awards for Fiscal 2010 for the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and other executive officers.

The Compensation Committee takes historicalstores listed above, Free People also operates wholesale sales and operating profit performanceshowroom facilities in New York City, Los Angeles and Chicago that are leased through 2017, 2014 and 2019, respectively. Leifsdottir operates a wholesale sales and showroom facility in New York City that is leased through the current business environment into account in the development of the performance targets upon which performance bonuses are based.

year 2014.

Equity-Based IncentivesItem 3. Legal Proceedings

The Compensation CommitteeWe are party to various legal proceedings arising from normal business activities. Management believes that stock ownership by management and equity-based performance compensation arrangements are useful tools to align the interestsultimate resolution of management with those of the Company’s shareholders. Where executives are shareholders themselves, the executives will realize a direct benefit by achieving the objective of maximizing shareholder value. In addition, as shareholders, executives would stand to benefit from successful growth of the Company’s brands to the extent that this would increase the value of their shareholdings. Accordingly, the Company’s executives are eligible to receive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and/or restricted stock units and performance stock units under the Company’s stock incentive plans, which have all been approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Company has in place three stock option plans, including the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Plans”).

Stock Options

The committee believes that including stock options in the compensation program serves the Company’s longer-term goals. Whereas base salary and performance bonuses compensate for achievement of shorter-term goals, it is anticipated that stock options motivate the executive to focus on the Company’s long-term success because the value of the options generally cannot be realized for several years. To date, the committee has granted only time-based stock options.

The exercise price of stock options is equal to or greater than Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares on the date of the grant, as defined in the Plans. Awards granted pursuant to the Plans may be subject to performance-based vesting conditions; although to date, all stock options have been time-based.

The Compensation Committee determines whether to grant stock options and the size of the grant to each executive officer based upon its subjective assessment. The committee evaluates the executive officer’s performance after taking into consideration prior years’ grants, the organizational impact of the executive officer and the need to respond to competitive conditions in order retain executive officers and attract new candidates. The Committee did not grant any stock options to named executive officers in fiscal year 2009.

The anti-dilution provisions of the Company’s 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan were amended on November 14, 2006 by the Board of Directors for the purpose of removing any ambiguity regarding the mandatory nature of those anti-dilution provisions, and to clarify that the Compensation Committee has discretion only with respect to the manner of the adjustment to ensure that equitable and proportionate adjustments are made.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock awards are one of several equity-based incentives available to the committee under the Plans. The Compensation Committee has not made restricted stock awards to named executive officers except for a one-time grant in fiscal year 2005, however, the committee believes that restricted stock awards generally share the same beneficial characteristics of stock options and fit into the Company’s overall compensation philosophy in the same manner.

Performance Stock Units

Performance stock unit awards are another one of several equity-based incentives available to the Compensation Committee under the Plans. Fiscal year 2009 is the first year that the committee has elected to award performance stock units.

On April 28, 2008, the Compensation Committee made two performance stock unit awards to the Chief Executive Officer. Performance stock units are convertible on a one-for-one basis into Common Shares when vested. Vesting is both time-based and performance based; the awardsthese matters will not vest until the date specified in the award agreement and are forfeited entirely if the established performance criteria are not achieved. The committee considers the awards granted to be an integral component of the Chief Executive Officer’s overall compensation.

The first award entitles the Chief Executive Officer to receive Common Shares at the end of fiscal year 2010, provided that (i) the average of the Company’s Operating Profit (defined as income from operations divided by net sales, excluding certain

types of acquisitions, as these terms as used in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income) in fiscal year 2009 and fiscal year 2010 meets or exceeds the established target and (ii) the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plans) of the Company’s Common Shares at the end of fiscal 2010 meets or exceeds the established threshold. The second award entitles the executive to receive Common Shares at the end of fiscal year 2011, provided that (i) the average of the Company’s Operating Profit in fiscal years 2009 through 2011 meets or exceeds the established target and (ii) the Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares at the end of fiscal 2011 meets or exceeds the established threshold. All performance stock units are forfeited if the performance criteria are not met or in the event of the executive’s Termination of Service (as defined in the Plans) prior to the vesting date. At the time of the award, the Compensation Committee expected that the performance criteria would be challenging and achievable only through superior performance, however, if current economic conditions persist, they may have a material adverse effect on his ability to achieve these performance objectives.

The Compensation Committee believes that the performance stock units awarded in fiscal year 2009 promote the overall profitabilityour financial position, results of the Company and its shareholders by linking the financial interests of the executive to the achievement of long term growth in shareholder value. Furthermore, these awards are intended to provide the executive with incentive to continue his employment with the Company. In establishing the criteria and vesting periods for these awards, the Compensation Committee selected average Operating Profit of the Company and Fair Market Value of the Company’s Common Shares. The committee believes these criteria support its compensation objective of creating long-term incentives (by providing for delayed vesting of the performance stock unit until goals spanning a twooperations or three periods are met) and tying those incentives directly to shareholder value (by basing the criteria on future Operating Profit and share price).

Under each award, the executive is entitled to receive 30,184 Common Shares (valued on the award date at approximately $1 million) upon satisfaction of the applicable goals. The number of shares issuable under each award will be reduced to the extent that the Fair Market Value of the shares on the date of issuance has a value exceeding $1.3 million.cash flows.

Timing

The Company generally considers once-a-year grants to a broad group of executivesItem 4. (Removed and managers, including named executive officers, typically around the time of its Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and at other times for business purposes related to employee promotions, or retention, or new hires. The Company, as mentioned, made two performance stock unit awards to the Chief Executive Officer in fiscal year 2009. The Company makes grants which are effective on or after the date when the Stock Option Plan Administrator, the Compensation Committee, or, for grants that relate to 40,000 or fewer shares, the Chairman approves the grant. The Company does not time grants with respect to the release of positive or negative material non-public information.

Potential Payments Upon Changes in Control; Certain Corporate TransactionsReserved)

All of the Plans provide that in the event of a “change in control” of the Company, all remaining unvested options and restricted stock awards will immediately vest and become exercisable, as applicable. “Change in control” is defined to include an event in which any person or group acquires majority beneficial ownership of the Company, other than Richard A. Hayne or benefit plans sponsored by either the Company or its subsidiaries. The basis for the change in control provisions is that they are consistent with previous Company plans, customary in industry practice and competitive in the marketplace. Assuming a change in control of the Company occurred on January 31, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer, Glen T. Senk, would have received full vesting of restricted stock units in an amount equal to $6,232,000. Performance stock units under Mr. Senk’s two performance stock unit awards do not vest automatically upon a change in control.

In the event of certain corporate transactions (such as a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, separation, reorganization, or liquidation), the Compensation Committee has discretion to terminate all or a portion of outstanding options and stock appreciation rights, effective as of the closing of the corporate transaction, if it determines that such termination is in the best interests of the Company. If the committee decides to terminate, the holder will have the right to exercise outstanding options and stock appreciation rights on at least seven days’ notice. The basis for selecting these corporate transactions as a triggering event for potential termination by the Compensation Committee is that it is customary in industry practice.

Additional Types of Compensation

In addition to the three main elements, the Company provides additional compensation to its executive officers in the form of: (i) a 401(k) matching contribution which is available to all employees who have completed six months of service, which is $0.25 on every $1.00 of employee deferral up to 6% of salary match, with a vesting schedule of 20% a year for five years, and with the deferral limited by applicable law; (ii) a Christmas bonus, capped at $5,000; and (iii) employee awards made to all staff with fixed dollar amounts for terms of service, in five-year service increments, ranging from $1,000 for 10 years of service to $15,000 for 30 years of service.

Benchmarking

The Compensation Committee does not engage in formal benchmarking when setting compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, although the committee has in the past and would expect in the future to consider information regarding compensation of executive officers of other specialty apparel retailers in developing the compensation plan.

The Compensation Committee takes the Company’s own historical data into consideration to ensure that compensation increases are consistent with the growth in responsibility and operating profit of its executives. Each year the committee reviews a summary of all of the Company’s named executive officer and key management personnel compensation for the previous fiscal year as well as prior fiscal years. All historical data is viewed with the operating results and responsibilities of management personnel and specific performance.

Compensation Committee Discretion

The factors related to increasing the compensation and potential compensation from bonuses of named executive officers from year-to-year takes into account increased sales and profitability, performance and measurably increased responsibilities, with a focus on both performance and the leveraging of selling, general and administrative expenses. Historically, the Company has not decreased base salaries or the bonus potential of named executive officers. This is because its history of growth has led to larger responsibilities for its named executive officers and because as a matter of philosophy, it does not generally reduce these compensation elements for existing employees. As more fully described above, however, at the Chairman’s request, the Compensation Committee set the Chairman’s base salary at $1.00 in fiscal year 2009 and that salary remains in effect for fiscal year 2010.

As stated above, the Compensation Committee has discretion in the granting of Performance Bonus Awards and can grant such awards to named executive officers, at its discretion, even if specified performance goals are not achieved. The requirements for Performance Bonus Awards were not waived in Fiscal 2009, but could be waived in the future to reward specific performance achievements in an instance where the actual criteria for a performance bonus were not met or for purposes of retention.

Pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has discretion to accelerate the date on which options or stock appreciation rights may be exercised, and may accelerate the date of termination of the restrictions applicable to restricted stock and restrict stock units if it determines that to do either would be in the best interests of the Company and the plan participants.

The Company at present has no employment agreements or contracts with its named executive officers and has no policies for post termination compensation arrangements. In the future, however, the Company may, in its sole discretion, decide to provide some form of severance in the event that a named executive officer’s employment ceases. No named executive officers separated from the Company in Fiscal 2009 and no such payments were made.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Historically, the Company has believed that the tax and accounting treatments of stock options were a favorable factor in its granting of them. The advent of FAS 123(R) and the change in accounting treatment accorded the granting of stock options has changed that assessment.

The applicability of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may affect the tax deductibility of certain portions of named executive officers’ compensation. Wherever possible, the Company structures compensation for its executive officers in a way that preserves tax deductibility under Section 162(m).

The Company does not usually consider the tax consequences to named executive officers of cash compensation or of equity based compensation, though it considers the tax treatment to the Company for non-qualified options and the non-qualifying disposition of qualified options to be favorable.

Security Ownership Guidelines

The Company has no policy that requires or that sets guidelines for the ownership of Common Shares of the Company; nor does it have any policy on the hedging of economic risk of such ownership or of vested stock options, other than requiring full compliance with all applicable laws.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
 Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)
($)
  Option
Awards(2)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)
 All Other
Compensation(3)
($)
  Total
($)

Glen T. Senk,

 2009 1,003,846 5,000 1,156,359(4) —   1,000,000 —   4,534(5) 3,166,580

Chief Executive Officer

 2008 750,000 250,000 1,153,200  —   300,000 —   7,683  2,460,883

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 577,218 5,000 1,153,200  —   50,000 —   3,438  1,788,856

(Principal Executive Officer)

         

John E. Kyees,

 2009 439,615 5,000 —    —   184,800 —   4,150(6) 633,565

Chief Financial Officer

 2008 424,500 5,000 —    87,408 50,000 —   4,461  571,369

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 411,585 5,000 —    159,502 —   —   4,175  580,262

(Principal Financial Officer)

         

Tedford A. Marlow,

 2009 469,731 5,000 —    —   244,438 —   278(7) 719,447

President,

 2008 453,904 5,000 —    —   50,000 —   268  509,172

Urban Outfitters Brand

 2007 436,676 5,000 —    —   50,000 —   205  491,881

Margaret Hayne,

 2009 337,500 5,000 —    —   115,500 —   4,011(8) 462,011

President,

         

Free People Brand

         

Glen A. Bodzy,

 2009 299,769 5,000 —    —   105,000 —   4,068(9) 413,837

Secretary and General Counsel

 2008 289,692 6,314 —    40,180 35,000 —   4,451  375,637

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

 2007 281,085 5,000 —    78,869 30,000 —   3,329  398,283

(1)Stock award represents 400,000 shares of restricted Common Shares with a grant date weighted average fair value of $14.42 per share, resulting in a grant date fair value of $5,768,000, which has a term of five years .
(2)Compensation expense recorded for option awards are calculated under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment.” The estimated fair value of the options for Fiscal 2009 were calculated using the Lattice Binomial Option Pricing Model and all other years presented were calculated using the Black Sholes option pricing Model. For a further description of the assumptions and accounting for stock options, see footnote 9 in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009.
(3)Includes matching cash contributions in Fiscal 2009 by the Company under the Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan of $4,370 for Mr. Senk, $3,723 for Mr. Kyees, $3,863 for Ms. Hayne and $3,790 for Mr. Bodzy.
(4)In accordance with FAS123(R), the Company did not record compensation expense during Fiscal 2009 with respect to two performance stock unit awards granted on April 28, 2008. These performance stock unit awards vest only upon satisfaction of certain performance conditions. The awards were valued using a Lattice Binomial model. In accordance with FAS123(R), the compensation expense amount of $442,102 was not recognized for financial statement reporting purposes because vesting was deemed highly improbable. For a further description of the assumptions and accounting for performance stock units, see footnote 9 in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2009. Whether Mr. Senk will receive any shares in respect of the performance stock units is contingent on whether the Company achieves certain performance objectives. For a description of these performance objectives, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.
(5)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Senk in the amount of $164.
(6)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Kyees in the amount of $427.
(7)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Marlow in the amount of $278.
(8)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Ms. Hayne in the amount of $148.
(9)Includes life insurance premiums paid by the Company for Mr. Bodzy in the amount of $278.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

      Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
  Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of

Shares
of Stock

or Units
(#)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Grant Date
Fair

Value of
Stock
and Option
Awards

($)
 

Name

  Grant
Date
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
        

Glen T. Senk

  —    2,000,000  2,000,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    
  4/28/2008      60,368  60,368  —    —    —    2,000,000(2) 

John E. Kyees

  —    264,000  264,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  —    282,000  564,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Margaret Hayne

  —    210,000  420,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

Glen A. Bodzy

  —    150,000  150,000  —    —    —    —    —    —    

(1)The threshold column has been omitted because the Company’s bonus plan for Fiscal 2009 did not provide for the threshold concept. The target and the maximum potential award for achieving all of the initial bonus goals are the same, except for Tedford A. Marlow and Margaret Hayne. The amounts shown in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table (on page 23) reflect that some goals were achieved and some were not met. For a further discussion on how the Compensation Committee determines the criteria for the Company’s executive officers’ performance bonuses, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Performance Bonuses” above. For a description of each named executive officer’s performance objectives, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Determination of Amount of Element; Relation of Elements to Primary Compensation Objectives—Performance Bonuses—Performance Targets” above.
(2)Based on the closing price on April 28, 2008, the date the performance stock unit awards were made. Whether Mr. Senk will receive any shares in respect of the performance stock units is contingent on whether the Company achieves certain performance objectives. For a description of these performance objectives, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.”

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2009 FISCAL YEAR-END

   Option Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
  Market
Value
of

Shares
or

Units
of

Stock
That
Have

Not
Vested

($)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units, or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)
 

Glen T. Senk

  1,600,000   0  0  14.35  6/20/2014  —    —    —     —    
  100,000(1)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    
  —     —    —    —    —    —    —    400,000(2)  6,232,000(3) 
               60,368(4)  940,533(5) 

John E. Kyees

  200,000     0  9.22  11/23/2011  —    —    —     —    
  300,000   0  0  14.35  6/20/2014  —    —    —     —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  600,000   0  0  1.47  7/23/2011  —    —    —     —    
  100,000(6)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    

Margaret Hayne

  —     —    —    —    —    —    —    —     —    

Glen A. Bodzy

  8,000   0  0  3.37  5/18/2009  —    —    —     —    
  48,000   0  0  1.08  8/31/2010  —    —    —     —    
  128,000   0  0  1.43  8/8/2011  —    —    —     —    
  160,000     0  5.91  9/5/2013  —    —    —     —    
  80,000(7)  0  0  31.11  11/17/2015  —    —    —     —    

(1)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Senk until November 18, 2010.
(2)Restricted Common Shares vest on June 21, 2009.
(3)Calculated by multiplying our closing market price on January 30, 2009 by the number of restricted Common Shares that have not vested.
(4)If all performance objectives are achieved, 30,184 performance stock units will convert into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis upon vesting on January 31, 2010. If all performance objectives are achieved, 30,184 performance stock units will convert into Common Shares on a one-for-one basis upon vesting on January 31, 2011. If performance objectives under the respective award are not achieved, all performance stock units under that award are forfeited. For a further description of these performance stock unit awards, see “Compensation of Executive Officers—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Related Incentives—Performance Stock Units.”
(5)Calculated by multiplying our closing market price on January 30, 2009 by the number of performance stock units that have not vested.
(6)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Marlow until November 18, 2010.
(7)Options vested in their entirety on January 18, 2006. All Common Shares acquired upon exercise of these options are required to be held by Mr. Bodzy until November 18, 2010.

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING FISCAL 2009

   Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
(#)
  Value
Realized

on
Exercise
($)
  Number
of Shares
Acquired
on
Vesting
(#)
  Value
Realized
on
Vesting
($)

Glen T. Senk

  —      —    —  

John E. Kyees

  300,000  4,750,903  —    

Tedford A. Marlow

  300,000  8,610,843  —    —  

Margaret Hayne

  —    —    —    —  

Glen A. Bodzy

  —    —    —    —  

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (collectively, the “Committee”) has submitted the following report for inclusion in this Proxy Statement:

Our Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on our Committee’s review of and the discussions with management with respect to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2009 for filing with the SEC.

The foregoing report is provided by the following Directors, who constitute the Compensation Committee:

Scott A. Belair,Chairman of the Compensation Committee

Joel S. Lawson III

Robert H. Strouse

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Belair, Mr. Lawson and Mr. Strouse. No member of the Compensation Committee is or was during Fiscal 2009 an employee, or is or ever has been an officer, of the Company or its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the Company served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another company, one of whose executive officers serves as a member of the Company’s Board or Compensation Committee. Please see “Certain Business Relationships” below with respect to Mr. Belair.

PART IVII

 

Item 15.5.ExhibitsMarket for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Financial Statement SchedulesIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “URBN.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated below, the reported high and low closing sale prices for our common shares as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Market Information

   High  Low

Fiscal 2010

    

Quarter ended April 30, 2009

  $ 19.49  $ 14.13

Quarter ended July 31, 2009

  $24.04  $18.76

Quarter ended October 31, 2009

  $33.86  $24.43

Quarter ended January 31, 2010

  $35.64  $30.52

Fiscal 2009

    

Quarter ended April 30, 2008

  $34.64  $26.67

Quarter ended July 31, 2008

  $34.30  $28.82

Quarter ended October 31, 2008

  $37.20  $18.61

Quarter ended January 31, 2009

  $22.31  $12.82

Holders of Record

On March 26, 2010 there were 108 holders of record of our common shares.

Dividend Policy

Our current credit facility includes certain limitations on the payment of cash dividends on our common shares. We have not paid any cash dividends since our initial public offering and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common shares in the foreseeable future.

Stock Performance

The following tables and graph compare the cumulative total shareholder return on our common shares with the cumulative total return on the Standard and Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Index and the Standard and Poor’s 500 Apparel Retail Index for the period beginning January 31, 2005 and ending January 31, 2010, assuming the reinvestment of any dividends and assuming an initial investment of $100 in each. The comparisons in this table are required by the SEC and are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of the common shares or the referenced indices.

*$100 invested on 1/31/05 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal years ending January 31.

Company / Index

  Base
Period
Jan-05
  INDEXED RETURNS
Years Ended
    Jan-06  Jan-07  Jan-08  Jan-09  Jan-10

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

  $100  $129.83  $116.00  $137.87  $74.07  $150.08

S&P 500

  $100  $110.38  $126.40  $123.48  $75.78  $100.89

S&P 500 Apparel Retail

  $100  $94.80  $109.07  $104.31  $53.21  $105.21

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table shows the status of securities under the Company’s stock incentive plans as of January 31, 2010:

   EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
   Number of
Securities to
be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options, Restricted
Shares,

Warrants and
Rights
  Weighted-
Average Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options, Restricted
Shares,

Warrants and
Rights
  No. of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plan (Excluding Securities
Referenced in Column (A))

Plan Category

  (A)  (B)  (C)

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders (1):

     

Securities

  11,751,699  $21.01(2)  10,783,550

Equity Compensation Plans not Approved by Security Holders:

  —     —     —  
          

Total

  11,751,699  $21.01   10,783,550
          

(1)Amounts are subject to adjustment to reflect any stock dividend, stock split, share consideration or similar change in our capitalization.
(2)Weighted average exercise price does not take into account performance stock unit awards.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth selected consolidated income statement and balance sheet data for the periods indicated. The selected consolidated income statement and balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal years presented below is derived from our consolidated financial statements. The data presented below should be read in conjunction with Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the related notes thereto, which appear elsewhere in this report. The results of operations for past accounting periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future accounting period.

  Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
  2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
  (in thousands, except share amounts and per share data)

Income Statement Data:

     

Net sales

 $1,937,815 $1,834,618 $1,507,724 $1,224,717 $1,092,107

Gross profit

  786,145  713,478  576,772  451,921  448,606

Income from operations

  338,984  299,435  224,945  163,989  207,699

Net income

  219,893  199,364  160,231  116,206  130,796

Net income per common share—basic

 $1.31 $1.20 $0.97 $0.71 $0.80

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

  168,053,502  166,793,062  165,305,207  164,679,786  163,717,726

Net income per common share—diluted

 $1.28 $1.17 $0.94 $0.69 $0.77

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

  171,230,245  170,860,605  169,640,585  168,652,005  169,936,041

Balance Sheet Data:

     

Working capital

 $617,664 $483,252 $266,232 $231,087 $251,675

Total assets

  1,636,093  1,329,009  1,142,791  899,251  769,205

Total liabilities

  339,318  275,234  289,360  223,968  208,325

Total shareholders’ equity

 $1,296,775 $1,053,775 $853,431 $675,283 $560,880

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We operate two business segments; a leading lifestyle merchandising retailing segment and a wholesale apparel segment. Our retailing segment consists of our Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie, Free People and Terrain brands, whose merchandise is sold directly to our customers through our stores, catalogs, call centers and web sites. Our wholesale apparel segment consists of our Free People wholesale division and our Leifsdottir division. Free People wholesale designs, develops and markets young women’s contemporary casual apparel. Leifsdottir designs, develops and markets sophisticated women’s contemporary apparel.

A store is included in comparable store net sales data, as presented in this discussion, if it has been open at least one full fiscal year prior to fiscal 2010, unless it was materially expanded or remodeled within that year or was not otherwise operating at its full capacity within that year. Sales from stores that do not fall within the definition of a comparable store are considered non-comparable. Furthermore, non-store sales, such as catalog and website related sales and foreign currency translation adjustments are also considered non-comparable.

Although we have no precise empirical data as it relates to customer traffic or customer conversion rates in our stores, we believe that, based only on our observations, changes in transaction volume, as discussed in our results of operations, may correlate to changes in customer traffic. Transaction volume changes may be caused by a response to our brands’ fashion offerings, our web advertising, circulation of our catalogs and an overall growth in brand recognition as we expand our store base.

Our fiscal year ends on January 31. All references in this discussion to our fiscal years refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, our fiscal 2010 ended on January 31, 2010.

Our historical and long-term goal is to achieve a net sales compounded annual growth rate of 20% or better through a combination of opening new stores, growing comparable store sales, continuing the growth of our direct-to-consumer and wholesale operations and introducing new concepts.

Retail Store

As of January 31, 2010, we operated 155 Urban Outfitters stores of which 130 are located in the United States, 7 are located in Canada and 18 are located in Europe. During fiscal 2010, we opened 13 new Urban Outfitters stores, 12 of which are located within the United States and 1 which is located in Europe. Urban Outfitters targets young adults aged 18 to 30 through a unique merchandise mix and compelling store environment. Our product offering includes women’s and men’s fashion apparel, footwear and accessories, as well as an eclectic mix of apartment wares and gifts. We plan to open additional stores over the next several years, some of which may be outside the United States. Urban’s North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 33.7% and 5.5% of consolidated net sales, respectively, for fiscal 2010.

We operated 137 Anthropologie stores as of January 31, 2010, of which 133 are located in the United States, 3 are located in Canada and 1 is located in Europe. During fiscal 2010 we opened 16 new Anthropologie stores, of which 12 are located within the United States, 3 are located in Canada,

and 1 is located in Europe. Anthropologie tailors its merchandise to sophisticated and contemporary women aged 30 to 45. Our product assortment includes women’s casual apparel and accessories, home furnishings and a diverse array of gifts and decorative items. We plan to open additional stores over the next several years, including opening additional Anthropologie stores in Europe. Anthropologie’s North American and European store sales accounted for approximately 36.1% and 0.3% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

We operated 34 Free People stores as of January 31, 2010, all of which are located in the United States. During fiscal 2010 we opened 4 new Free People stores. Free People primarily offers private label branded merchandise targeted to young contemporary women aged 25 to 30. Free People provides a unique merchandise mix of casual women’s apparel, accessories and gifts. We plan to open additional stores over the next several years. Free People’s retail store sales accounted for approximately 2.0% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

We operated one Terrain garden center as of January 31, 2010, which is located in Glen Mills, Pennsylvania. Terrain is our newest store concept designed to appeal to customers interested in a creative, sophisticated outdoor living and gardening experience. Terrain seeks to create a compelling shopping environment through its large and freestanding site, inspired by the ‘greenhouse.’ Merchandise includes lifestyle home and garden products combined with antiques, live plants, flowers, wellness products and accessories. Terrain also offers a variety of landscape and design services. Terrain store sales accounted for less than 1.0% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

For all brands combined, we plan to open approximately 45 new stores during fiscal 2011, including approximately 9 new Free People stores. The remaining new stores will be divided approximately evenly between Urban Outfitters and Anthropologie.

Direct -to-Consumer

Anthropologie offers a direct-to-consumer catalog that markets select merchandise, most of which is also available in our Anthropologie stores. During fiscal 2010, we circulated approximately 17.4 million catalogs and believe that our catalogs have been instrumental in helping to build the Anthropologie brand identity with our target customers. We plan to increase circulation to approximately 18.4 million catalogs during fiscal 2011.

Anthropologie operates a web site,www.anthropologie.com,that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar array of apparel, accessories, household and gift merchandise as found in the stores. As with our catalog, we believe that the web site increases Anthropologie’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the strength of Anthropologie’s store operations.

Urban Outfitters offers a direct-to-consumer catalog offering selected merchandise, much of which is also available in our Urban Outfitters stores. During fiscal 2010, we circulated approximately 12.1 million Urban Outfitters catalogs. We believe this catalog has expanded our distribution channels and increased brand awareness. We plan to increase circulation to approximately 13.2 million catalogs during fiscal 2011.

Urban Outfitters operates a web site,www.urbanoutfitters.com, that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site captures the spirit of the store by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in the stores. As with the Urban Outfitters catalog, we believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with its target customers, as well as helps to support the strength of Urban Outfitters’ store operations.

Urban Outfitters also operates a web site targeting our European customers. The web site,www.urbanoutfitters.co.uk, captures the spirit of our European stores by offering a similar selection of merchandise as found in our stores. Fulfillment is provided from a third-party distribution center located in the United Kingdom. We believe the web site increases the reputation and recognition of the brand with our European customers as well as helps to support our Urban Outfitters’ European store operations.

Free People offers a direct-to-consumer catalog offering select merchandise most of which is also available in our Free People stores. During fiscal 2010, Free People circulated approximately 7.4 million catalogs. We believe this catalog has expanded our distribution channels and increased brand awareness. We plan to expand catalog circulation to approximately 8.2 million catalogs during fiscal 2011.

Free People operates a web site,www.freepeople.com,that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site exposes consumers to the product assortment found at Free People retail stores as well as all of the Free People wholesale offerings. As with our catalog, we believe that the web site increases Free People’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of Free People’s store operations.

Terrain operates a web site that accepts orders directly from customers. The web site,www.shopterrain.com, was launched in September 2009. The web site exposes consumers to a portion of the product assortment found at the Terrain retail store. We believe that the web site increases Terrain’s reputation and brand recognition with its target customers and helps support the traffic of Terrain’s store operations.

Increases in our catalog circulation are driven by our evaluation of the response rate to each individual catalog. Based upon that evaluation, we adjust the frequency and circulation of our catalog portfolio as needed. In addition, we evaluate the buying pattern of our direct-to-consumer customers to determine which customers who respond to our catalog mailings. We also utilize the services of list rental companies to identify potential customers that will receive future catalogs.

We plan on increasing our spending on investments in web marketing for Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People in fiscal 2011. These increases will be based on our ongoing daily evaluation of the customer’s response rate to our marketing investments.

Direct-to-consumer sales for all brands combined were approximately 16.7% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

Wholesale Operations

The Free People wholesale division designs, develops and markets young women’s contemporary casual apparel. During fiscal 2010, Free People’s range of tops, bottoms, sweaters and dresses were sold worldwide through approximately 1,400 better department and specialty stores, including

Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Lord & Taylor, Belk, Urban Outfitters and our own Free People stores. Free People wholesale sales accounted for approximately 4.9% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

The Leifsdottir wholesale division was established in fiscal 2009. Leifsdottir designs, develops and markets sophisticated women’s contemporary apparel including dresses, tops and bottoms. Leifsdottir is sold through luxury department stores including Bloomingdale’s, Nordstrom, Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, select specialty stores and our own Anthropologie stores. Leifsdottir wholesale sales accounted for less than 1% of total consolidated net sales for fiscal 2010.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These generally accepted accounting principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period.

Our senior management has reviewed the critical accounting policies and estimates with our audit committee. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. If actual results were to differ significantly from estimates made, the reported results could be materially affected. We are not currently aware of any reasonably likely events or circumstances that would cause our actual results to be materially different from our estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale for retail store sales or when merchandise is shipped to customers for wholesale and direct-to-consumer sales, net of estimated customer returns. Revenue is recognized at the completion of a job or service for landscape sales. Revenue is presented on a net basis and does not include any tax assessed by a governmental or municipal authority. Payment for merchandise at our stores and through our direct-to-consumer business is by cash, check, credit card, debit card or gift card. Therefore, our need to collect outstanding accounts receivable for our retail and direct-to-consumer business is negligible and mainly results from returned checks or unauthorized credit card transactions. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for our wholesale and landscape service accounts receivable, which management reviews on a regular basis and believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses and billing adjustments. Deposits for custom orders are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. These custom orders, typically for upholstered furniture, are not material. Deposits for landscape services are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon completion of service. Landscape services and related deposits are not material.

We account for a gift card transaction by recording a liability at the time the gift card is issued to the customer in exchange for consideration from the customer. A liability is established and remains on our books until the card is redeemed by the customer at which time we record the redemption of the

card for merchandise as a sale or when we determine the likelihood of redemption is remote. We determine the probability of the gift cards being redeemed to be remote based on historical redemption patterns. Revenues attributable to gift card liabilities relieved after the likelihood of redemption becomes remote are included in sales and are not material. Our gift cards do not expire.

Sales Return Reserve

We record a reserve for estimated product returns where the sale has occurred during the period reported, but the return is likely to occur subsequent to the period reported and may otherwise be considered in-transit. The reserve for estimated in-transit product returns is based on our most recent historical return trends. If the actual return rate or experience is materially higher than our estimate, additional sales returns would be recorded in the future. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, reserves for estimated sales returns in-transit totaled $9.9 million and $7.5 million, representing 2.9% and 2.7% of total liabilities, respectively.

Marketable Securities

Our marketable securities may be classified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities represent those securities that we have both the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Interest on these securities, as well as amortization of discounts and premiums, is included in interest income. Available-for-sale securities represent debt securities that do not meet the classification of held-to-maturity, are not actively traded and are carried at fair value, which approximates amortized cost. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. Other than temporary impairment losses related to credit losses, as defined by ASC 320Investments—Debt and Equity Securities, are considered to be realized losses. When available-for-sale securities are sold, the cost of the securities is specifically identified and is used to determine the realized gain or loss. Securities classified as current have maturity dates of less than one year from the balance sheet date. Securities classified as long-term have maturity dates greater than one year from the balance sheet date. Available for sale securities such as ARS that fail at auction and do not liquidate under normal course are classified as long term assets. Successful auctions would be classified as current assets. Marketable securities as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 were classified as available-for-sale.

Inventories

We value our inventories, which consist primarily of general consumer merchandise held for sale, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method and includes the cost of merchandise and import related costs, including freight, import taxes and agent commissions. A periodic review of inventory quantities on hand is performed in order to determine if inventory is properly stated at the lower of cost or market. Factors related to current inventories such as future consumer demand and fashion trends, current aging, current and anticipated retail markdowns or wholesale discounts, and class or type of inventory are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable value. Criteria utilized by the Company to quantify aging trends includes factors such as average selling cycle and seasonality of merchandise, the historical rate at which merchandise has sold below cost during the average selling cycle, and the value and nature of merchandise currently priced below original cost. A provision is recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to the estimated net realizable

values, if required. The majority of inventory at January 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of finished goods. Unfinished goods and work-in-process were not material to the overall net inventory value. Net inventories as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 totaled $186.1 million and $169.7 million, representing 11.4% and 12.8% of total assets, respectively. Any significant unanticipated changes in the risk factors noted within this report could have a significant impact on the value of our inventories and our reported operating results.

Adjustments to reserves related to the net realizable value of our inventories are primarily based on the market value of our physical inventories, cycle counts and recent historical trends. Our physical inventories for fiscal 2010 were performed as of June 2009 and January 2010. Our estimates generally have been accurate and our reserve methods have been applied on a consistent basis. We expect the amount of our reserves to increase over time as we expand our store base and accordingly, related inventories.

Long-Lived Assets

Our long-lived assets consist principally of store leasehold improvements, buildings and furniture and fixtures, and are included in the “Property and equipment, net” line item in our consolidated balance sheets included in this report. Store leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the lesser of the applicable store lease term, including lease renewals which are reasonably assured, or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvements. The typical initial lease term for our stores is ten years. Buildings are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over 39 years. Furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over their useful life, which is typically five years. Net property and equipment as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 totaled $540.0 million and $505.4 million, respectively, representing 33.0% and 38.0% of total assets, respectively.

In assessing potential impairment of our store related assets, we periodically evaluate historical and forecasted operating results and cash flows on a store-by-store basis. Newly opened stores may take time to generate positive operating and cash flow results. Factors such as store type (e.g., mall versus free-standing), store location (e.g., urban area versus college campus or suburb), current marketplace awareness of our brands, local customer demographic data and current fashion trends are all considered in determining the time frame required for a store to achieve positive financial results, which, in general, is assumed to be measurable within three years from the date a store location has opened. If economic conditions are substantially different from our expectations, the carrying value of certain of our long-lived assets may become impaired. For fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, write-downs of long-lived assets were not material.

We have not historically encountered material early retirement charges related to our long-lived assets. The cost of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the accounts with any resulting gain or loss included in net income. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expense as incurred. Major renovations or improvements that extend the service lives of our assets are capitalized over the extension period or life of the improvement, whichever is less. In January of fiscal 2010 we converted one Free People store location in Chicago to a Free People Wholesale Showroom.

As of the date of this report, all of our stores are expected to generate positive annual cash flow before allocation of corporate overhead.

Accounting for Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax obligations together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of certain items for tax and accounting purposes, such as depreciation of property and equipment and valuation of inventories. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. Actual results could differ from this assessment if adequate taxable income is not generated in future periods. Net deferred tax assets as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 totaled $43.6 million and $46.3 million, respectively, representing 2.7% and 3.5% of total assets, respectively. To the extent we believe that recovery of an asset is at risk, we establish valuation allowances. To the extent we establish valuation allowances or increase the allowances in a period, we include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of income.

We increased valuation allowances to $2.2 million as of January 31, 2010 from $1.4 million as of January 31, 2009. This increase is based on evidence of our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain state and foreign jurisdictions. In the future, if enough evidence of our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income in these jurisdictions becomes apparent, we would be required to reduce our valuation allowances, resulting in a reduction in income tax expense in the consolidated statement of income. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the likelihood that we will realize the deferred tax assets and adjusts the valuation allowances, if appropriate.

Accounting for Contingencies

From time to time, we are named as a defendant in legal actions arising from our normal business activities. We account for contingencies such as these in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. We are required to record an estimated loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of our consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accounting for contingencies arising from contractual or legal proceedings requires management to use its best judgment when estimating an accrual related to such contingencies. As additional information becomes known, our accrual for a loss contingency could fluctuate, thereby creating variability in our results of operations from period to period. Likewise, an actual loss arising from a loss contingency which significantly exceeds the amount accrued in our consolidated financial statements could have a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period in which such actual loss becomes known.

Results of Operations

As a Percentage of Net Sales

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of our net sales represented by certain income statement data and the change in certain income statement data from period to period. This table should be read in conjunction with the discussion that follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended
January 31,
 
  2010  2009  2008 

Net sales

  100.0 100.0 100.0

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs

  59.4   61.1   61.7  
          

Gross profit

  40.6   38.9   38.3  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

  23.1   22.6   23.3  
          

Income from operations

  17.5   16.3   15.0  

Interest income

  0.3   0.6   0.6  

Other income

  —     —     —    

Other expenses

  —     —     —    
          

Income before income taxes

  17.8   16.9   15.6  

Income tax expense

  6.4   6.0   4.9  
          

Net income

  11.4 10.9 10.7
          

Period over Period Change:

    

Net sales

  5.6 21.7 23.1

Gross profit

  10.2 23.7 27.6

Income from operations

  13.2 33.1 37.2

Net income

  10.3 24.4 37.9

Fiscal 2010 Compared to Fiscal 2009

Net sales in fiscal 2010 increased by 5.6% to $1.94 billion, from $1.83 billion in the prior fiscal year. The $103 million increase was attributable to a $109 million or 6.3% increase, in retail segment net sales that was partially offset by a $6 million or 5.4% decline in our wholesale segment net sales. The growth in our retail segment net sales during fiscal 2010 was driven by an increase of $115 million in non-comparable and new store net sales, and an increase in direct-to-consumer net sales of $53 million or 19.5%. These increases were partially offset by a decline of $35 million or 2.6% in comparable store net sales and $24 million of foreign currency translation adjustments. The decrease in comparable store net sales was comprised of 0.6%, 11.0% and 4.0% decreases at Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters, respectively. The decline in our wholesale segment net sales was due to a $11 million or 10.6% decline at Free People wholesale that was partially offset by an increase of $5 million or 185% at Leifsdottir.

The increase in net sales attributable to non-comparable and new stores was primarily the result of opening 33 new stores in fiscal 2010 and 49 new stores in fiscal 2009 that were considered non-comparable during fiscal 2010. Comparable store net sales decreases were primarily the result of decreases in the number of units sold per transaction, that were partially offset by slight increases in average unit sales prices and transactions. Thus far during fiscal 2011 total Company net sales are favorable versus the same period in the prior year and our comparable retail segment sales trend has improved significantly from our most recently completed quarter. Direct-to-consumer net sales in fiscal year 2010 increased over the prior year primarily due to increased traffic to our web sites, which more than offset decreases in conversion rate and average order value. Catalog circulation across all brands decreased by 3 million or 8.2%. The decrease in Free People wholesale net sales was driven by decreases in transactions and average unit sale prices. Leifsdottir wholesale net sales increase was a result of increased transactions that more than offset a decline in average unit sale prices.

Gross profit rates in fiscal 2010 increased to 40.6% of net sales or $786 million from 38.9% of net sales or $713 million in fiscal 2009. This improvement is primarily due to improvements in our initial merchandise margins which were partially offset by a higher rate of store occupancy expense driven by the decrease in comparable store sales. Total inventories at January 31, 2010 increased by $16 million or 9.7% to $186 million from $170 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of inventory to stock new and non-comparable stores. Comparable store inventory at cost decreased by 3%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2010 increased to 23.1% of net sales or $447 million versus 22.6% of net sales or $414 million for fiscal 2009. The rate increase is primarily due to an increase in incentive based compensation that relates to meeting targeted operating performance goals in fiscal 2010. The dollar increase versus the prior year is primarily related to the operating expenses of new and non-comparable stores.

Income from operations increased to 17.5% of net sales or $339 million for fiscal 2010 compared to 16.3% of net sales or $299 million for fiscal 2009.

Our annual effective income tax rate increased to 36.2% of income for fiscal 2010 compared to 35.6% of income for fiscal 2009. The increase in fiscal 2010’s tax rate is primarily due to a lower proportion of tax free interest income due to a strategic shift to a mix of lower risk securities versus the prior year’s holdings. See Note 8 “Income Taxes” in our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report, for a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate. We expect the tax rate for fiscal 2011 to be favorable to fiscal 2010 due in part to an anticipated increase in income generated from foreign operations.

Fiscal 2009 Compared to Fiscal 2008

Net sales in fiscal 2009 increased by 21.7% to $1.83 billion, from $1.51 billion in the prior fiscal year. The $327 million increase was primarily attributable to a $311 million or 22.0% increase, in retail segment sales. Our wholesale segment contributed $16 million to this increase for fiscal year 2009 as Free People wholesale net sales increased $13 million or 13.4%, excluding sales to our retail segment, and Leifsdottir contributed $3 million. The growth in our retail segment sales during fiscal 2009 was driven by an increase of $156 million in non-comparable and new store net sales, an increase

in direct-to-consumer net sales of $67 million or 32.4%, an increase to comparable store net sales of $88 million or 7.8%. The increase in comparable store net sales was comprised of 3.4%, 4.1% and 11.9% increases at Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters, respectively.

The increase in net sales attributable to non-comparable and new stores was primarily the result of opening 49 new stores in fiscal 2009 and 38 new stores in fiscal 2008 that were considered non-comparable during fiscal 2009. Comparable store net sales increases were primarily the result of increases in average unit sales prices and increases in transactions resulting from an increased response to our merchandise offerings. These increases more than offset a slight decrease in the number of units sold per transaction. Direct-to-consumer net sales in fiscal year 2009 increased over the prior year primarily due to increased traffic to our web sites, that more than offset minor decreases in conversion rate and average order value. Circulation modestly increased by 688,000 catalogs or 1.7%. The increase in Free People wholesale net sales was driven by increased average unit sale prices and increased transactions.

Gross profit rates in fiscal 2009 increased to 38.9% of net sales or $713 million from 38.3% of net sales or $577 million in fiscal 2008. This improvement is primarily due to leveraging of our store occupancy expenses and improvements in our initial merchandise margins which are partially offset by adjustments to record anticipated markdowns during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Total inventories at January 31, 2009 decreased by 1.3% to $170 million from $172 million in the prior fiscal year. The decrease is primarily due to a 13% decrease in comparable store inventory which more than offset additions to inventories for new and non-comparable stores.

Selling, general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2009 decreased to 22.6% of net sales versus 23.3% of net sales for fiscal 2008. The rate reduction is primarily due to controlling selling and store support related expenses in addition to lower corporate expenses resulting from non-recurring legal fees incurred in the prior year. Selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2009 increased to $414 million from $352 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase primarily related to the operating expenses of new and non-comparable stores.

Income from operations increased to 16.3% of net sales or $299 million for fiscal 2009 compared to 15.0% of net sales or $225 million for fiscal 2008.

Our annual effective income tax rate increased to 35.6% of income for fiscal 2009 compared to 31.6% of income for fiscal 2008. The increase in this year’s tax rate is due to the prior year’s annual effective tax rate being favorably impacted by the receipt of one-time federal tax incentives for work performed on the development of our new home offices. See Note 8 “Income Taxes” in our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this report, for a reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to our effective tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $745 million as of January 31, 2010 as compared to $521 million as of January 31, 2009 and $374 million as of January 31, 2008. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities during fiscal 2010 was primarily a result of $325 million from cash provided by operating activities as compared to $252 million in fiscal 2009, that primarily consists of net income and the add back of the non-cash items, depreciation and

amortization expense. Cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2010 was $495 million of which $109 million was used primarily for the construction of new stores and $386 million was the net activity used for purchases and sales of marketable securities. Cash from financing activities in fiscal 2010 of $10 million was related to exercises of stock options and related tax benefits on stock option exercises. Our working capital for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $618 million, $483 million and $266 million, respectively. The changes in working capital primarily relate to changes to the volume of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and inventories relative to inventory-related payables and store-related accruals.

During the last three years, we have satisfied our cash requirements through our cash flow from operations. Our primary uses of cash have been to open new stores and purchase inventories. We have also continued to invest in our direct-to-consumer efforts, wholesale businesses and in our European subsidiaries. Cash paid for property and equipment, net of tenant improvement allowances included in deferred rent for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $109 million, $109 million and $92 million respectively, and were primarily used to expand and support our store base. During fiscal 2011, we plan to construct and open approximately 45 new stores, renovate certain existing stores, complete an expansion of our home office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, modestly increase our catalog circulation by approximately 3 million catalogs to approximately 40 million catalogs, and purchase inventory for our stores, direct-to-consumer and wholesale businesses at levels appropriate to maintain our planned sales growth. We plan to increase the level of capital expenditures during fiscal 2011 to approximately $130 million. We believe that our new store, catalog and inventory investments have the ability to generate positive cash flow within a year. We believe improvements to our home office and distribution facilities are necessary to adequately support our growth.

During fiscal 2011, we plan to complete a 54,000 square foot expansion of our home office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We anticipate the project will cost approximately $25 million. We believe this expansion will help support our growth for the near term.

During fiscal 2010, we completed a 100,000 square foot addition to our Lancaster, Pennsylvania distribution facility. This facility primarily serves our midwest and east coast stores. We believe this expansion will help support our growth for the near term.

During fiscal 2008, we entered into an operating lease for a warehouse facility in Reno, Nevada to support our western United States stores. The facility is approximately 214,500 square feet and the term of the lease is set to expire in 2017 with our option to renew for up to an additional 10 years. During fiscal 2008, we invested approximately $6.3 million in equipment and other improvements for this location. In March 2009, we executed a lease for an additional 39,000 square feet of warehouse space at our Reno, Nevada facility that is included in the total noted above. We believe this expansion will help support our growth for the next several years.

During fiscal 2011, we may enter into one or more acquisitions or transactions related to the expansion of our brands. We do not anticipate that these acquisitions or transactions individually or in the aggregate will be material to our financial statements as a whole.

On February 28, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program. The program authorizes us to repurchase up to 8,000,000 common shares from time-to-time, based upon prevailing market conditions. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, we repurchased and subsequently retired 1,220,000 shares at a cost of approximately $21 million. No shares have been repurchased since fiscal 2007.

On September 21, 2009, we amended our renewed and amended line of credit facility with Wachovia Bank, National Association (the “Line”). This amendment adds additional subsidiary borrowers and adds certain additional subsidiary guarantors. The Line is a three-year revolving credit facility with an accordion feature allowing an increase in available credit up to $100.0 million at our discretion, subject to a seven day request period. As of January 31, 2010, the credit limit under the Line was $60.0 million. The Line contains a sub-limit for borrowings by our European subsidiaries that are guaranteed by us. Cash advances bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.60% based on our achievement of prescribed adjusted debt ratios. The Line subjects us to various restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants such as fixed charge coverage and adjusted debt. The covenants also include limitations on our capital expenditures, ability to repurchase shares and the payment of cash dividends. As of January 31, 2010 we were in compliance with all covenants under the Line. As of January 31, 2010, there were no borrowings under the Line. Outstanding letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit under the Line totaled approximately $36.3 million as of January 31, 2010. The available credit, including the accordion feature under the Line was $63.7 million as of January 31, 2010. We believe the renewed Line will satisfy our letter of credit needs through fiscal 2011. We plan to renew the line during fiscal 2011 and expect the renewal will satisfy our credit needs through fiscal 2011 and the foreseeable future. Wachovia Bank, National Association was acquired by Wells Fargo, effective January 1, 2009. The Wells Fargo acquisition did not affect the original line agreement.

We have entered into agreements that create contractual obligations and commercial commitments. These obligations and commitments will have an impact on future liquidity and the availability of capital resources. Accumulated cash and future cash from operations, as well as available credit under our line of credit facility, are expected to fund such obligations and commitments. The tables noted below present a summary of these obligations and commitments as of January 31, 2010:

Contractual Obligations

      Payments Due by Period (in thousands)

Description

  Total
Obligations
  Less Than
One

Year
  One to
Three
Years
  Three to
Five

Years
  More Than
Five

Years

Operating leases (1)

  $1,155,843  $139,562  $421,370  $242,101  $352,810

Purchase orders (2)

   221,985   221,985   —     —     —  

Construction contracts (3)

   2,893   2,893   —     —     —  

Tax Contingencies (4)

   710   710   —     —     —  
                    

Total contractual obligations

  $1,381,431  $365,150  $421,370  $242,101  $352,810
                    

(1)Includes store operating leases, which generally provide for payment of direct operating costs in addition to rent. The obligation amounts shown above only reflect our future minimum lease payments as the direct operating costs fluctuate over the term of the lease. Additionally, there are 22 locations where a percentage of sales are paid in lieu of a fixed minimum rent that are not reflected in the above table. Total rent expense related to these 22 locations was approximately $3.3 million for fiscal 2010. It is common for the lease agreements for our European locations to adjust the minimum rental due to the current market rate multiple times during the term. The table above includes our best estimate of the future payments for these locations. Amounts noted above include commitments for 22 executed leases for stores not opened as of January 31, 2010.

(2)Our merchandise commitments are cancellable with no or limited recourse available to the vendor until merchandise shipping date.
(3)Includes construction contracts with contractors that are fully liquidated upon the completion of construction, which is typically within 12 months.
(4)Tax contingencies include $0.7 million that are classified as a current liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2010. Tax contingencies in the table above do not show an existing liability of $10.0 million because we cannot reasonably estimate in which future periods these amounts will ultimately be settled. The $10.0 is classified as a long term liability in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2010.

Commercial Commitments

Description

  Total
Amounts
Committed
  Amount of Commitment Per Period
(in thousands)
    Less
Than
One

Year
  One
to
Three
Years
  Three
to
Five
Years
  More
Than
Five

Years

Line of credit (1)

  $32,349  $32,349  $—    $—    $—  

Standby letters of credit

   3,932   3,932   —     —     —  
                    

Total commercial commitments

  $36,281  $36,281  $—    $—    $—  
                    

(1)Consists primarily of outstanding letter of credit commitments in connection with import inventory purchases.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of and for the three years ended January 31, 2010, except for operating leases entered into in the normal course of business, we were not party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Other Matters

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) which was codified into The Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 810. This standard responds to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46(R), including those regarding the transparency of the involvement with variable interest entities. Specifically, ASC Topic 810 requires a qualitative approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and requires ongoing assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In addition, the standard requires additional disclosures about the involvement with a VIE and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The provisions of ASC Topic 810 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We plan to adopt these provisions in fiscal 2011 and anticipate the adoption to have no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Seasonality and Quarterly Results

The following tables set forth our net sales, gross profit, net income and net income per common share (basic and diluted) for each quarter during the last two fiscal years and the amount of such net sales and net income, respectively, as a percentage of annual net sales and annual net income. The unaudited financial information has been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

   Fiscal 2010 Quarter Ended 
  April 30,
2009
  July 31,
2009
  Oct. 31,
2009
  Jan. 31,
2010
 
  (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Net sales

  $384,796   $458,626   $505,900   $588,493  

Gross profit

   143,305    187,091    210,088    245,661  

Net income

   30,805    49,021    62,392    77,675  

Net income per common share—basic

   0.18    0.29    0.37    0.46  

Net income per common share—diluted

   0.18    0.29    0.36    0.45  

As a Percentage of Fiscal Year:

     

Net sales

   20  24  26  30

Net income

   14  22  29  35
   Fiscal 2009 Quarter Ended 
   April 30,
2008
  July 31,
2008
  Oct. 31,
2008
  Jan. 31,
2009
 
   (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Net sales

  $394,292   $454,295   $477,953   $508,078  

Gross profit

   158,680    186,510    195,396    172,892  

Net income

   42,557    56,988    59,274    40,545  

Net income per common share—basic

   0.26    0.34    0.35    0.24  

Net income per common share—diluted

   0.25    0.33    0.35    0.24  

As a Percentage of Fiscal Year:

     

Net sales

   21  25  26  28

Net income

   21  29  30  20

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to the following types of market risks—fluctuations in the purchase price of merchandise, as well as other goods and services; the value of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar; and changes in interest rates. Due to the Company’s inventory turnover rate and its historical ability to pass through the impact of any generalized changes in its cost of goods to its customers through pricing adjustments, commodity and other product risks are not expected to be material. The Company purchases the majority of its merchandise in U.S. dollars, including a portion of the goods for its stores located in Canada and Europe.

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. As of January 31, 2010 the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities consisted primarily of funds invested in money market accounts,

Federal Government Agencies, FDIC insured corporate bonds, pre-refunded tax-exempt municipal bonds rated “A” or better, tax-exempt municipal bonds rated A or better, and auction rate securities rated A or better, which bear interest at a variable rate. Due to the average maturity and conservative nature of the Company’s investment portfolio, we believe a 100 basis point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. As the interest rates on a material portion of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are variable, a change in interest rates earned on the cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities would impact interest income along with cash flows, but would normally not impact the fair market value of the related underlying instruments.

Approximately 4.5% of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested in “A” or better rated ARS that represent interests in municipal and student loan related collateralized debt obligations, all of which are guaranteed by either government agencies and/or insured by private insurance agencies up to 97% or greater of par value. The Company’s ARS had a par value of $37.6 million and a fair value of $33.5 million as of January 31, 2010. As of January 31, 2010, all of the ARS held by the Company failed to liquidate at auction due to lack of market demand. As of January 31, 2009, the Company had $44.0 million of par and 38.7 million of fair value ARS. Liquidity for these ARS is typically provided by an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually 7, 28, 35 or 90 days. The principal associated with these failed auctions will not be available until either a successful auction occurs, the bond is called by the issuer, a buyer is found from outside the auction process, or the debt obligation reaches its maturity. Based on review of credit quality, collateralization, final stated maturity, estimates of the probability of being called or becoming liquid prior to final maturity, redemptions of similar ARS, previous market activity for the same investment security, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and valuation models, we have recorded $4.1 million and $5.3 million of temporary impairment charges on our ARS as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. To date, we have collected all interest receivable on outstanding ARS when due and expect to continue to do so in the future. We do not have the intent to sell the underlying securities prior to their recovery and we believe it is not likely to sell the underlying securities prior to their anticipated recovery of full amortized cost. As a result of the current illiquidity, the Company has classified all ARS as long term assets under marketable securities. The Company continues to monitor the market for ARS and consider the impact, if any, on the fair value of its investments.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations and from pages F-1 through F-30.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this review, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, 2010.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our system of internal control is designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the design and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on theInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 31, 2010.

The effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010 was audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report that is included on page 39 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of January 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended and our report dated March 31, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 31, 2010

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers and directors:

Name

Age

Position

Richard A. Hayne

62Chairman of the Board of Directors and President

Glen T. Senk

53Director and Chief Executive Officer

Eric Artz

42Chief Financial Officer

Glen A. Bodzy

57General Counsel and Secretary

Tedford G. Marlow

58President, Urban Outfitters Brand

Wendy B. McDevitt

45Co-President, Anthropologie Brand

Wendy Wurtzburger

52Co-President, Anthropologie Brand

Freeman M. Zausner

62Chief Administrative Officer

Margaret Hayne

52President, Free People

Frank J. Conforti

34Controller

Scott A. Belair (2)(3)

62Director

Harry S. Cherken, Jr. (1)

60Director

Joel S. Lawson III (2)(3)

62Director

Robert H. Strouse (1)(2)(3)

61Director

(1)Member of the Nominating Committee.
(2)Member of the Audit Committee.
(3)Member of the Compensation Committee.

Mr. Hayne co-founded Urban Outfitters in 1970 and has been Chairman of the Board of Directors and President since the Company’s incorporation in 1976. Margaret Hayne, President of Free People, is Mr. Hayne’s spouse.

Mr. Senk, a director since 2004, has served as Chief Executive Officer since May 2007, and prior to that, as President of Anthropologie, Inc. since April 1994. Mr. Senk was named Executive Vice President of Urban Outfitters, Inc. in May 2002, and assumed responsibility for the Company’s Free People division in May 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Senk was Senior Vice President and General Merchandise Manager of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Chief Executive of the Habitat International Merchandise and Marketing Group in London, England. Mr. Senk began his retail career at Bloomingdale’s, where he served in a variety of roles including Managing Director of Bloomingdale’s By Mail. Mr. Senk serves as a member of the Board of Directors for Tory Burch, Inc and previously served as a member of the Board of Directors for Bare Escentuals, Inc.

Mr. Artz joined Urban Outfitters as its Chief Financial Officer in February, 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Artz held various positions at VF Corporation from 1992 through 2009 including Chief Financial Officer of VF Contemporary Brands, Chief Operation Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Seven for All Mankind and Vice President of Operations for VF Outdoor. Mr. Artz, a Certified Public Accountant, began his career with Ernst and Young in their audit department.

Mr. Bodzy joined Urban Outfitters as its General Counsel in December 1997 and was appointed Secretary in February 1999. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bodzy was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Service Merchandise Company, Inc. where he was responsible for legal affairs, the store development program and various other corporate areas.

Mr. Marlow has served as President, Urban Outfitters Brand since July 2001. Prior to joining the Company, for the period from September 2000 to July 2001, Mr. Marlow served as Executive Vice President of Merchandising, Product Development, Production and Marketing at Chicos FAS, Inc., a clothing retailer. Previously, he was Senior Vice President at Saks Fifth Avenue from November 1998 to September 2000, where he was responsible for all Saks Fifth Avenue private brand product development. From January 1995 to November 1998, Mr. Marlow served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Henri Bendel, a division of The Limited Brands, Inc. Mr. Marlow will retire from his position as President, Urban Outfitters Brand, effective April 12, 2010. Mr. Marlow is expected to remain with the Company in the role of Executive Director of Business Development focusing on international expansion and special projects.

Ms. McDevitt, Co-President of the Anthropologie brand, joined Urban Outfitters in November 1992 and has served within all of the URBN brands including Director of Administration for URBN, Director of Operations/Stores for Urban Outfitters Europe, Executive Director of Stores and Operations for Anthropologie and Chief Operating Officer for Anthropologie. Prior to joining the Company, Mrs. McDevitt worked with Liz Claiborne.

Ms. Wurtzburger, Co-President of the Anthropologie brand, joined Urban Outfitters in 1998 and has served in a senior merchandising role at the Anthropologie brand, including as the Chief Merchandise Officer. Prior to joining the company, Ms. Wurtzburger held buying and merchandising roles with a variety of department and specialty stores including Abraham & Straus, Macy’s West and Mimi Maternity.

Mr. Zausner rejoined the Company in February 2003 as a consultant and in July 2003 became its Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Zausner originally joined the Company in 1980 and became its Director of Inventory Management in 1988 and its Secretary in 1990. Mr. Zausner retired from the Company in 1996.

Ms. Hayne joined Urban Outfitters in August 1982. She is a 34-year veteran of the retail and wholesale industry and has served as President of Free People since March 2007. Mr. Hayne, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President, is Mrs. Hayne’s husband.

Mr. Conforti joined Urban Outfitters in March 2007 as Director of Finance and SEC Reporting and has been Controller since February 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Conforti, a Certified Public Accountant, worked for AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC for five years serving as Controller for three years. Mr. Conforti began his career at KPMG in 1998 where he held various audit roles.

Mr. Belair co-founded Urban Outfitters in 1970 and has been a director since its incorporation in 1976. He has served as Principal of The ZAC Group, a financial advisory firm, during the last eighteen years. Previously, he was a managing director of Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated. Mr. Belair is also a director of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (HCBK), and Hudson City Savings Bank, the nation’s largest S&L institution by market capitalization.

Mr. Cherken, a director since 1989, has been a partner in the law firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania since 1984, is a former managing partner of that firm and until January 2007 served as Co-Chair of its Real Estate Group.

Mr. Lawson, a director since 1985, is an independent consultant and private investor. From November 2001 until November 2003, he also served as Executive Director of M&A International Inc., a global organization of merger and acquisition advisory firms. From 1980 until November 2001, Mr. Lawson was Chief Executive Officer of Howard, Lawson & Co., an investment banking and corporate finance firm. Howard, Lawson & Co. became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of FleetBoston Financial Corporation in March 2001.

Mr. Strouse, a director since 2002, serves as President of Wind River Holdings, L.P. Wind River oversees a diversified group of privately owned industrial and service businesses.

Code of Conduct and Ethics

We have had a written code of conduct for a number of years. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics applies to our Directors and employees, including our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The Code includes guidelines relating to compliance with laws, the ethical handling of actual or potential conflicts of interest, the use of corporate opportunities, protection and use of our confidential information, accepting gifts and business courtesies, accurate financial reporting, and procedures for promoting compliance with, and reporting violations of, the Code. The Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.urbanoutfittersinc.com. We intend to post any amendments to our Code of Conduct and Ethics on our website and also to disclose any waivers (to the extent applicable to the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Principal Accounting Officer) on a Form 8-K within the prescribed time period.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Other Information

Other information required by Item 10 relating to the Company’s directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements

Consolidated Financial Statements filed herewith are listed in the accompanying index on page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule

None

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The Exhibits listed below are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report. The file number for each exhibit incorporated by reference is 000-22754 unless otherwise provided.

 

Exhibit

Number

  

Description

  3.1**

  3.1
  Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 9, 2004.

  3.2**

  3.2
  Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on September 9, 2004.

  3.3**

  3.3
  Amended and Restated Bylaws are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2009.

10.1**

10.1
  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on December 10, 2004.

10.2**

10.2
  First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2007.

10.3**

10.3
  Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008.

10.4+**

Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 24, 2009.
10.5+  Urban Outfitters 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixBof the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 26, 2004 and Amendment No. 1 to the Urban Outfitters 2004 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 25, 2005.

10.5+**Exhibit

Number

Description

10.6+  1997 Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January 31, 1997.

10.6+**

10.7+
  Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-84333) filed on August 3, 1999.

10.7+**

  10.8+
  2000 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 17, 2000.

10.8+**

  10.9+
  2008 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to AppendixA of the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 28, 2008.2008

10.9+**

10.10+
  Urban Outfitters Executive Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective February 1, 2010, is incorporated by reference to AppendixBAof the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 25, 2005.1, 2010.

21.1**

10.11+
  ListForm of Subsidiaries2004 Plan—Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s AnnualCurrent Report on Form 10-K8-K filed on April 1,June 18, 2009.

10.12+

Form of 2004 Plan—Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2009.
10.13+Form of 2004 Plan—Incentive Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2009.
10.14+Form of 2008 Plan—Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2009.
10.15+Form of 2008 Plan—Non-Employee Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2009.
10.16+Form of 2008 Plan—Incentive Stock Option Agreement is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2009.
21.1*List of Subsidiaries.
23.1**

  Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.LLP.

31.1*

  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer.

31.2*

  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer.

32.1***

  Section 1350 Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.Officer.

32.2***

  Section 1350 Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 2009.Officer.

 

*Filed herewith
**Previously filed and incorporated by reference.
***Previously furnished and incorporated by reference.Furnished herewith
+Compensatory plan

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.
June 19, 2009By:

/s/ RICHARD A. HAYNE

Richard A. Hayne
President
April 1, 2010 By: 

/s/    GLEN T. SENK

  Glen T. Senk
  

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/s/    RICHARD A. HAYNE        

Richard A. Hayne

  By:

Chairman of the Board, President and Director

 April 1, 2010

/s/    GLEN T. SENK        

Glen T. Senk

(Principal Executive Officer)

Chief Executive Officer and Director

April 1, 2010

/s/    ERIC ARTZ        

Eric Artz

(Principal Financial Officer)

Chief Financial Officer

April 1, 2010

/s/    FRANK J. CONFORTI        

Frank J. Conforti

(Principal Accounting Officer)

Controller

April 1, 2010

/s/    SCOTT A. BELAIR        

Scott A. Belair

Director

April 1, 2010

/s/    HARRY S. CHERKEN, JR.        

Harry S. Cherken, Jr.

Director

April 1, 2010

/s/    JOHNOEL E. KS. LYEESAWSON III        

Joel S. Lawson III

Director

April 1, 2010

/s/    ROBERT H. STROUSE        

Robert H. Strouse

Director

April 1, 2010

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  John E. KyeesPage

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009

  F-3

(PrincipalConsolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended January  31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Officer)Statements

F-7

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 31, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 31, 2010

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   January 31, 
  2010  2009 
ASSETS   

Current assets:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  $159,024   $316,035  

Marketable securities

   342,512    49,948  

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,284 and $1,229, respectively

   38,405    36,390  

Inventories

   186,130    169,698  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   67,865    46,412  

Deferred taxes

   12,277    5,919  
         

Total current assets

   806,213    624,402  
         

Property and equipment, net

   539,961    505,407  

Marketable securities

   243,445    155,226  

Deferred income taxes and other assets

   46,474    43,974  
         

Total Assets

  $1,636,093   $1,329,009  
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   

Current liabilities:

   

Accounts payable

  $78,041   $62,955  

Accrued compensation

   21,913    11,975  

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

   88,595    66,220  
         

Total current liabilities

   188,549    141,150  

Deferred rent and other liabilities

   150,769    134,084  
         

Total Liabilities

   339,318    275,234  
         

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 11)

   

Shareholders’ equity:

   

Preferred shares; $.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

   —      —    

Common shares; $.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized, 168,558,371 and 167,712,088 issued and outstanding, respectively

   17    17  

Additional paid-in capital

   184,620    170,166  

Retained earnings

   1,121,232    901,339  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   (9,094  (17,747
         

Total Shareholders’ Equity

   1,296,775    1,053,775  
         

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $1,636,093   $1,329,009  
         

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 

Net sales

  $1,937,815   $1,834,618   $1,507,724  

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs

   1,151,670    1,121,140    930,952  
             

Gross profit

   786,145    713,478    576,772  

Selling, general and administrative expenses

   447,161    414,043    351,827  
             

Income from operations

   338,984    299,435    224,945  

Interest income

   6,290    11,504    9,390  

Other income

   463    694    575  

Other expenses

   (1,331  (2,143  (515
             

Income before income taxes

   344,406    309,490    234,395  

Income tax expense

   124,513    110,126    74,164  
             

Net income

  $219,893   $199,364   $160,231  
             

Net income per common share:

    

Basic

  $1.31   $1.20   $0.97  
             

Diluted

  $1.28   $1.17   $0.94  
             

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   168,053,502    166,793,062    165,305,207  
             

Diluted

   171,230,245    170,860,605    169,640,585  
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

(in thousands, except share data)

  Compre-
hensive
Income
  Common Shares Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income
(Loss)
  Total 
  Number of
Shares
 Par
Value
    

Balances as of February 1, 2007

  164,987,463 $17 $128,586 $542,396   $4,284   $675,283  

Net income

 $160,231   —    —    —    160,231    —      160,231  

Foreign currency translation

  703   —    —    —    —      703    703  

Tax uncertainties

  —     —    —    —    (652  —      (652

Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of tax

  2,248   —    —    —    —      2,248    2,248  
          

Comprehensive income

 $163,182        
          

Share-based compensation

  —    —    3,277  —      —      3,277  

Exercise of stock options

  1,117,152  —    5,000  —      —      5,000  

Tax effect of share exercises

  —    —    7,341  —      —      7,341  
                     

Balances as of January 31, 2008

  166,104,615  17  144,204  701,975    7,235    853,431  

Net income

 $199,364   —    —    —    199,364    —      199,364  

Foreign currency translation

  (19,866 —    —    —    —      (19,866  (19,866

Unrealized losses on marketable securities, net of tax

  (5,116 —    —    —    —      (5,116  (5,116
          

Comprehensive income

 $174,382   —    —     —      —     
          

Share-based compensation

  —    —    3,637  —      —      3,637  

Exercise of stock options

  1,607,473  —    8,891  —      —      8,891  

Tax effect of share exercises

  —    —    13,434  —      —      13,434  
                     

Balances as of January 31, 2009

  167,712,088  17  170,166  901,339    (17,747  1,053,775  

Net income

 $219,893   —    —    —    219,893    —      219,893  

Foreign currency translation

  7,173   —    —    —    —      7,173    7,173  

Unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of tax

  1,480   —    —    —    —      1,480    1,480  
          

Comprehensive income

 $228,546        
          

Share-based compensation

  —    —    4,766  —      —      4,766  

Exercise of stock options

  846,283  —    3,250  —      —      3,250  

Tax effect of share exercises

  —    —    6,438  —      —      6,438  
                     

Balances as of January 31, 2010

  168,558,371 $17 $184,620 $1,121,232   $(9,094 $1,296,775  
                     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

  Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 

Cash flows from operating activities:

   

Net income

 $219,893   $199,364   $160,231  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

   

Depreciation and amortization

  92,350    81,949    70,017  

Provision for deferred income taxes

  2,161    (9,351  (2,782

Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation

  (6,438  (13,434  (7,341

Share-based compensation expense

  4,766    3,637    3,277  

Loss on disposition of property and equipment, net

  339    61    317  

Changes in assets and liabilities:

   

Receivables

  (1,825  (10,726  (5,462

Inventories

  (15,544  (272  (17,430

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  (25,619  9,210    (22,441

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  55,311    (8,868  75,967  
            

Net cash provided by operating activities

  325,394    251,570    254,353  
            

Cash flows from investing activities:

   

Cash paid for property and equipment

  (109,260  (112,553  (115,370

Cash paid for marketable securities

  (806,546  (809,039  (293,633

Sales and maturities of marketable securities

  421,040    864,685    220,101  
            

Net cash used in investing activities

  (494,766  (56,907  (188,902
            

Cash flows from financing activities:

   

Exercise of stock options

  3,250    8,891    5,000  

Excess tax benefit from stock option exercises

  6,438    13,434    7,341  
            

Net cash provided by financing activities

  9,688    22,325    12,341  
            

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  2,673    (6,224  212  
            

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (157,011  210,764    78,004  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

  316,035    105,271    27,267  
            

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $159,024   $316,035   $105,271  
            

Supplemental cash flow information:

   

Cash paid during the year for:

   

Income taxes

 $137,490   $115,040   $70,765  
            

Non-cash investing activities—Accrued capital expenditures

 $12,960   $6,561   $6,645  
            

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Nature of Business

Urban Outfitters, Inc. (the “Company” or “Urban Outfitters”), which was founded in 1970 and originally operated by a predecessor partnership, was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1976. The principal business activity of the Company is the operation of a general consumer product retail and wholesale business selling to customers through various channels including retail stores, three catalogs and five web sites. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company operated 327 and 294 stores, respectively. Stores located in the United States totaled 298 as of January 31, 2010 and 270 as of January 31, 2009. Operations in Europe and Canada included 19 stores and 10 stores as of January 31, 2010, respectively and 17 stores and 7 stores as of January 31, 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company’s wholesale segment sold and distributed apparel to approximately 1,400 better department and specialty retailers worldwide.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Fiscal Year-End

The Company operates on a fiscal year ending January 31 of each year. All references to fiscal years of the Company refer to the fiscal years ended on January 31 in those years. For example, the Company’s fiscal 2010 ended on January 31, 2010.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Urban Outfitters, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of less than three months at the time of purchase. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, cash and cash equivalents included cash on hand, cash in banks and money market accounts.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Marketable Securities

The Company’s marketable securities may be classified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities represent those securities that the Company has both the intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Interest on these securities, as well as amortization of discounts and premiums, is included in interest income. Available-for-sale securities represent debt securities that do not meet the classification of held-to-maturity, are not actively traded and are carried at fair value, which approximates amortized cost. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized. When available-for-sale securities are sold, the cost of the securities is specifically identified and is used to determine the realized gain or loss. Securities classified as current have maturity dates of less than one year from the balance sheet date. Securities classified as long-term have maturity dates greater than one year from the balance sheet date. Available for sale securities such as Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) that fail at auction and do not liquidate under normal course are classified as long term assets, any successful auctions would be classified as current assets. Marketable securities as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 were classified as available-for-sale.

Approximately 4.5% of the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested in “A” or better rated ARS that represent interests in municipal and student loan related collateralized debt obligations, all of which are guaranteed by either government agencies and/or insured by private insurance agencies at 97% or greater of par value. The Company’s ARS had a fair value of $33.5 million as of January 31, 2010 and $38.7 million as of January 31, 2009. As of and subsequent to the end of the current fiscal year, all of the ARS held by the Company failed to liquidate at auction due to a lack of market demand. Liquidity for these ARS was historically provided by an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, usually 7, 28, 35 or 90 days. The principal associated with these failed auctions will not be available until a successful auction occurs, the bond is called by the issuer, a buyer is found from outside the auction process, or the debt obligation reaches its maturity. Based on review of credit quality, collateralization, final stated maturity, estimates of the probability of being called or becoming illiquid prior to final maturity, redemptions of similar ARS, previous market activity for same investment security, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and valuation models, the Company has recorded $4.1 million and 5.3 million of temporary impairment on its ARS as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. To date the Company has collected all interest receivable on outstanding ARS when due and has not been informed by the issuers that accrued interest payments are currently at risk. The Company does not have the intent to sell the underlying securities prior to their recovery and the Company believes it is not likely that it will be required to sell the underlying securities prior to their anticipated recovery of full amortized cost. As a result of the current illiquidity, the Company has classified all ARS as long term assets under marketable securities. The Company continues to monitor the market for ARS and consider the impact, if any, on the fair value of its investments.

The Company also includes disclosure about its investments that are in an unrealized loss position for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable primarily consists of amounts due from our wholesale customers as well as credit card receivables. The activity of the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

   Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Deductions  Balance at
end of
year

Year ended January 31, 2010

  $1,229  $1,791  $(1,736 $1,284

Year ended January 31, 2009

  $966  $4,375  $(4,112 $1,229

Year ended January 31, 2008

  $849  $2,628  $(2,511 $966

Inventories

Inventories, which consist primarily of general consumer merchandise held for sale, are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in, first-out method and includes the cost of merchandise and import related costs, including freight, import taxes and agent commissions. A periodic review of inventory quantities on hand is performed in order to determine if inventory is properly stated at the lower of cost or market. Factors related to current inventories such as future consumer demand and fashion trends, current aging, current and anticipated retail markdowns or wholesale discounts, and class or type of inventory are analyzed to determine estimated net realizable value. Criteria utilized by the Company to quantify aging trends include factors such as average selling cycle and seasonality of merchandise, the historical rate at which merchandise has sold below cost during the average selling cycle, and the value and nature of merchandise currently priced below original cost. A provision is recorded to reduce the cost of inventories to the estimated net realizable values, if appropriate. The majority of inventory at January 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of finished goods. Unfinished goods and work-in-process were not material to the overall net inventory value.

Adjustments to reserves related to the net realizable value of inventories are primarily based on the market value of the Company’s physical inventories, cycle counts and recent historical trends. The Company’s physical inventories for fiscal 2010 were performed as of June 2009 and January 2010. The Company’s estimates generally have been accurate and their reserve methods have been applied on a consistent basis. The Company expects the amount of their reserves to increase over time as they expand their store base and accordingly, related inventories.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and primarily consist of store related leasehold improvements, buildings and furniture and fixtures. Depreciation is typically computed using the straight-line method over five years for furniture and fixtures, the lesser of the lease term or useful life for leasehold improvements, three to ten years for other operating equipment and 39 years for buildings. Major renovations or improvements that extend the service lives of our assets are capitalized over the extension period or life of the improvement, whichever is less.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company reviews long-lived assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. This determination includes evaluation of factors such as future asset utilization and future net undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets. Management believes there has been no impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets as of January 31, 2010.

Deferred Rent

Rent expense from leases is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease period. The net excess of rent expense over the actual cash paid is recorded as deferred rent. In addition, certain store leases provide for contingent rentals when sales exceed specified break-point levels that are weighted based upon historical cyclicality. For leases where achievement of these levels is considered probable based on cumulative lease year revenue versus the established breakpoint at any given point in time, contingent rent is accrued. This is expensed in addition to minimum rent which is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease period.

Operating Leases

The Company leases its retail stores under operating leases. Many of the lease agreements contain rent holidays, rent escalation clauses and contingent rent provisions or some combination of these items. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the accounting lease term.

The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period commencing on the date that the premise is available from the landlord. The lease period includes the construction period to make the leased space suitable for operating during which time the Company is not permitted to occupy the space. For purposes of calculating straight-line rent expense, the commencement date of the lease term reflects the date the Company takes possession of the building for initial construction and setup.

The Company classifies tenant improvement allowances on its consolidated financial statements within deferred rent that will be amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the straight-line period. Tenant improvement allowance activity is presented as part of cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale for retail store sales or when merchandise is shipped to customers for wholesale and direct-to-consumer sales, net of estimated customer returns. Revenue is recognized at the completion of a job or service for landscape sales. Revenue is presented on a net basis and does not include any tax assessed by a governmental or municipal authority. Payment for merchandise at stores and through the Company’s direct-to-consumer business is tendered by cash, check, credit card, debit card or gift card. Therefore, the Company’s need to collect outstanding accounts receivable for its retail and direct-to-consumer business is negligible and mainly results from returned checks or unauthorized credit card transactions. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for its wholesale and landscape service accounts receivable, which management

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

reviews on a regular basis and believes is sufficient to cover potential credit losses and billing adjustments. Deposits for custom orders are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon delivery of the merchandise to the customer. These custom orders, typically for upholstered furniture, are not material. Deposits for landscape services are recorded as a liability and recognized as a sale upon completion of service. Landscape services and related deposits are not material.

The Company accounts for a gift card transaction by recording a liability at the time the gift card is issued to the customer in exchange for consideration from the customer. A liability is established and remains on the Company’s books until the card is redeemed by the customer, at which time the Company records the redemption of the card for merchandise as a sale or when it is determined the likelihood of redemption is remote. The Company determines the probability of the gift cards being redeemed to be remote based on historical redemption patterns. Revenues attributable to gift card liabilities relieved after the likelihood of redemption becomes remote are included in sales and are not material. The Company’s gift cards do not expire.

Sales Return Reserve

The Company records a reserve for estimated product returns where the sale has occurred during the period reported, but the return is likely to occur subsequent to the period reported and may otherwise be considered in-transit. The reserve for estimated in-transit product returns is based on the Company’s most recent historical return trends. If the actual return rate or experience is materially higher than the Company’s estimate, additional sales returns would be recorded in the future. The activity of the sales returns reserve for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:

   Balance at
beginning of
year
  Additions  Deductions  Balance at
end of
year

Year ended January 31, 2010

  $7,547  $33,889  $(31,524 $9,912

Year ended January 31, 2009

  $6,776  $28,408  $(27,637 $7,547

Year ended January 31, 2008

  $8,916  $35,952  $(38,092 $6,776

Cost of Sales, Including Certain Buying, Distribution and Occupancy Costs

Cost of sales, including certain buying, distribution and occupancy costs includes the following: the cost of merchandise; merchandise markdowns; obsolescence and shrink; store occupancy costs including rent and depreciation; customer shipping expense for direct-to-consumer orders; in-bound and outbound freight; U.S. Customs related taxes and duties; inventory acquisition and purchasing costs; warehousing and handling costs and other inventory acquisition related costs.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses includes expenses such as (i) direct selling and selling supervisory expenses; (ii) various corporate expenses such as information systems, finance, loss prevention, talent acquisition, and executive management expenses; and (iii) other associated general expenses.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

The Company includes shipping and handling revenues in net sales and shipping and handling costs in cost of sales. The Company’s shipping and handling revenues consist of amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling merchandise. Shipping and handling costs include shipping supplies, related labor costs and third-party shipping costs.

Advertising

The Company expenses the costs of advertising when the advertising occurs, except for direct-to-consumer advertising, which is capitalized and amortized over its expected period of future benefit. Advertising costs primarily relate to our direct-to-consumer marketing expenses which are composed of catalog printing, paper, postage and other costs related to production of photographic images used in our catalogs and on our web sites. These costs are amortized over the period in which the customer responds to the marketing material determined based on historical customer response trends to a similar season’s advertisement. Amortization rates are reviewed on a regular basis during the fiscal year and may be adjusted if the predicted customer response appears materially different than the historical response rate. The Company has the ability to measure the response rate to direct marketing early in the course of the advertisement based on its customers’ reference to a specific catalog or by product placed and sold. The average amortization period for a catalog and related items are typically three months. If there is no expected future benefit, the cost of advertising is expensed when incurred. Advertising costs reported as prepaid expenses were $3,238 and $2,585 as of January 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Advertising expenses were $46,827, $45,561 and $40,828 for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Start-up Costs

The Company expenses all start-up and organization costs as incurred, including travel, training, recruiting, salaries and other operating costs.

Web Site Development Costs

The Company capitalizes applicable costs incurred during the application and infrastructure development stage and expenses costs incurred during the planning and operating stage. During fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not capitalize any internal-use software development costs because substantially all costs were incurred during the planning stage, and costs incurred during the application and infrastructure development stage were not material.

Income Taxes

The Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which principally utilizes a balance sheet approach to provide for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company files a consolidated United States federal income tax return (see Note 8 for a further discussion of income taxes).

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Net Income Per Common Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, after giving effect to the potential dilution from the exercise of securities, such as stock options and non-vested shares, into shares of common stock as if those securities were exercised (see Note 10).

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of two subsets—net income and other comprehensive income. Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income relate to foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains or losses on marketable securities. The foreign currency translation adjustments are not adjusted for income taxes because these adjustments relate to indefinite investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries. Accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of foreign currency translation losses of $7,323 and $14,496 as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. Other comprehensive income included an unrealized loss, net of tax, on marketable securities of $1,771 and 3,251 as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. Gross realized gains are included in other income and were not material to the Company’s financial statements for all three years presented.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements of the Company’s foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates while income and expense accounts are translated at the average rates in effect during the year. Translation adjustments are not included in determining net income, but are included in accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. As of January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in losses of $7,323, $14,496 and gains of $5,370, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts receivable. The Company manages the credit risk associated with cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities by investing high-quality securities held with reputable trustees and, by policy, limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one issue. The Company’s investment policy requires that the majority of its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are invested in federally insured or guaranteed investment vehicles such as federal government agencies, FDIC insured corporate bonds, irrevocable pre-refunded municipal bonds and United States treasury bills. Receivables from third-party credit cards are processed by financial institutions, which are monitored for financial stability. The Company periodically evaluates the financial condition of its wholesale segment customers. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts reflects current market conditions and management’s assessment

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

regarding the collectability of its accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses from maintaining cash accounts in excess of such limits. Management believes that it is not exposed to any significant risks related to its cash accounts.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), which was codified into ASC Topic 810. This standard responds to concerns about the application of certain key provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) 46(R), including those regarding the transparency of the involvement with variable interest entities. Specifically, ASC Topic 810 requires a qualitative approach to identifying a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and requires ongoing assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and whether an interest in a VIE makes the holder the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In addition, the standard requires additional disclosures about the involvement with a VIE and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The provisions of ASC Topic 810 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt these provisions in fiscal 2011 and anticipates the adoption to have no effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

3. Marketable Securities

During all periods shown, marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair values of available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

   Amortized
Cost
  Unrealized
Gains
  Unrealized
(Losses)
  Fair
Value

As of January 31, 2010

       

Short-term Investments:

       

Municipal bonds

  $120,778  $357  $(5 $121,130

Federal government agencies

   154,470   229   (24  154,675

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   22,219   186   —      22,405

Treasury bills

   42,758   43   —      42,801

Equities

   1,800   —     (299  1,501
             ��  
   342,025   815   (328  342,512
                

Long-term Investments:

       

Municipal bonds

   35,699   302   (29  35,972

Federal government agencies

   116,625   394   (111  116,908

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   32,652   263   —      32,915

Treasury bills

   24,055   90   —      24,145

Auction rate securities

   37,625   —     (4,120  33,505
                
   246,656   1,049   (4,260  243,445
                
  $588,681  $1,864  $(4,588 $585,957
                

As of January 31, 2009

       

Short-term Investments:

       

Municipal bonds

  $15,814  $123  $—     $15,937

Federal government agencies

   24,975   —     —      24,975

Mutual funds

   5,046   —     —      5,046

Demand notes and equities

   4,840   2   (852  3,990
                
   50,675   125   (852  49,948
                

Long-term Investments:

       

Municipal bonds

   76,517   1,239   (10  77,746

Federal government agencies

   25,640   —     (141  25,499

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   13,318   —     (79  13,239

Auction rate securities

   44,025   —     (5,283  38,742
                
   159,500   1,239   (5,513  155,226
                
  $210,175  $1,364  $(6,365 $205,174
                

Proceeds from the sale and maturities of available-for-sale securities were $421,040, $864,685 and $220,101 in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company included in other income, a net realized gain of $1,075 during fiscal 2010, a net realized loss of $896 during fiscal 2009 and a net realized gain of $1 during fiscal 2008. Amortization of discounts and premiums, net, resulted in charges of $6,204, $2,444 and $1,734 for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s marketable securities with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired aggregated by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively.

   January 31, 2010 
   Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 

Description of Securities

  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
 

Municipal bonds

  25,468  (34 —    —     25,468  (34

Federal government agencies

  55,988  (135 —    —     55,988  (135

Equities

  —    —     1,501  (299 1,501  (299

Auction rate securities

  —    —     37,625  (4,120 37,625  (4,120
                   

Total

  81,456  (169 39,126  (4,419 120,582  (4,588
                   
   January 31, 2009 
   Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Greater  Total 

Description of Securities

  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Unrealized
Losses
 

Municipal bonds

  15,152  (10 —    —     15,152  (10

Federal government agencies

  25,499  (141 —    —     25,499  (141

FDIC insured corporate bonds

  13,239  (79 —    —     13,239  (79

Demand notes and equities

  988  (852 —    —     988  (852

Auction rate securities

  44,025  (5,283 —    —     44,025  (5,283
                   

Total

  98,903  (6,365 —    —     98,903  (6,365
                   

As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, there were a total of 53 and 50 issued securities with unrealized loss positions within the Company’s portfolio, respectively. The total unrealized loss position due to write-downs of ARS held by the Company that have experienced auction failures as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 was $4,120 and $5,283, respectively. The Company deemed all of these securities as temporarily impaired. The unrealized loss positions were primarily due to auction failures of the ARS held and fluctuations in the market interest rates for remaining securities. The Company believes it has the ability to realize the full value of all of these investments upon maturity or redemption.

As of January 31, 2010, the par value of our ARS was $37,625 and the estimated fair value was $33,505. Our ARS portfolio consists of “A” or better rated ARS that represent interests in municipal and student loan related collateralized debt obligations, all of which are guaranteed by either government agencies and/or insured by private insurance agencies at 97% or greater of par value. To date, we have collected all interest payable on outstanding ARS when due and have not been informed by the issuers that accrued interest payments are currently at risk. The Company does not have the intent to sell the underlying securities prior to their recovery and the Company believes it is not likely that it will be required to sell the underlying securities prior to their anticipated recovery of full amortized cost.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

4. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

In accordance with ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” the Company utilizes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach that relate to its financial assets and financial liabilities). The levels of the hierarchy are described as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; these include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of financial assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s financial assets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis are presented in the table below:

   Marketable Securities Fair Value as of
January 31, 2010
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total

Assets:

        

Municipal bonds

  $—    $157,102  $—    $157,102

Federal government agencies

   271,583   —     —     271,583

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   55,320   —     —     55,320

Treasury bills

   66,946   —     —     66,946

Auction rate securities

   —     —     33,505   33,505

Equities

   1,501   —     —     1,501
                
  $395,350  $157,102  $33,505  $585,957
                
   Marketable Securities Fair Value as of
January 31, 2009
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total

Assets:

        

Municipal bonds

  $—    $93,683  $—    $93,683

Mutual funds

   5,046   —     —     5,046

Auction rate securities

   —     —     38,742   38,742

Federal government agencies

   50,474   —     —     50,474

FDIC insured corporate bonds

   13,239   —     —     13,239

Demand notes and equities

   988   3,002   —     3,990
                
  $69,747  $96,685  $38,742  $205,174
                

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Level 1 assets consist of financial instruments whose value has been based on quoted market prices for identical financial instruments in an active market.

Level 2 assets consist of financial instruments whose value has been based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets as well as quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3 consists of financial instruments where there was no active market as of January 31, 2010 and 2009. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009 all of the Company’s level 3 financial instruments consisted of failed ARS of which there was insufficient observable market information to determine fair value. The Company estimated the fair values for these securities by incorporating assumptions that market participants would use in their estimates of fair value. Some of these assumptions included credit quality, collateralization, final stated maturity, estimates of the probability of being called or becoming liquid prior to final maturity, redemptions of similar ARS, previous market activity for the same investment security, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and valuation models. As a result of this review, the Company determined its ARS to have a temporary impairment of $4,120 and $5,283 as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The estimated fair values could change significantly based on future market conditions. The Company will continue to assess the fair value of its ARS for substantive changes in relevant market conditions, changes in its financial condition or other changes that may alter its estimates described above. Failed ARS represented approximately 4.5% and 7.4% of the Company’s total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively.

Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending ARS securities balances that the Company valued using a Level 3 valuation for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009.

   Fiscal Year Ended
January 31, 2010
  Fiscal Year Ended
January 31, 2009
 

Balance at beginning of period

  $38,742   $61,375  

Total gains (losses) realized/unrealized:

   

Included in earnings

   —      (2,880

Included in other comprehensive income

   1,163    (5,283

Purchases, issuances and settlements

   (6,400  (17,350

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   —      2,880  
         

Balance at end of period

  $33,505   $38,742  
         

Total losses for the period included in other comprehensive income attributable to the change in unrealized losses related to assets still held at reporting date

  $(4,120 $(5,283

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

5. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is summarized as follows:

   January 31, 
   2010  2009 

Land

  $2,387   $543  

Buildings

   96,617    96,205  

Furniture and fixtures

   242,123    214,178  

Leasehold improvements

   552,095    486,959  

Other operating equipment

   63,605    48,021  

Construction-in-progress

   19,869    15,458  
         
   976,696    861,364  

Accumulated depreciation

   (436,735  (355,957
         

Total

  $539,961   $505,407  
         

Depreciation expense for property and equipment for fiscal years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $86,146, $79,505 and $68,282, respectively.

6. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

   January 31,
  2010  2009

Accrued rents and estimated property taxes

  $10,598  $10,074

Gift certificates and merchandise credits

   25,161   22,307

Accrued construction

   13,046   6,261

Accrued income taxes

   5,216   301

Accrued sales taxes

   5,373   5,174

Accrued payroll taxes

   5,901   1,243

Sales return reserve

   9,912   7,547

Other current liabilities

   13,388   13,313
        

Total

  $88,595  $66,220
        

7. Line of Credit Facility

On September 21, 2009, the Company amended its renewed and amended line of credit facility with Wachovia Bank, National Association (the “Line”). This amendment adds additional subsidiary borrowers and adds certain additional subsidiary guarantors. The Line is a three-year revolving credit facility with an accordion feature allowing an increase in available credit up to $100 million at the Company’s discretion. As of January 31, 2010, the credit limit under the Line was $60 million. The Line contains a sub-limit for borrowings by the Company’s European subsidiaries that are guaranteed

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

by the Company. Cash advances bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.50% to 1.60% based on the Company’s achievement of prescribed adjusted debt ratios. The Line subjects the Company to various restrictive covenants, including maintenance of certain financial ratios and covenants such as fixed charge coverage and adjusted debt. The covenants also include limitations on the Company’s capital expenditures, ability to repurchase shares and the payment of cash dividends. As of January 31, 2010, there were no borrowings under the Line. Outstanding letters of credit and stand-by letters of credit under the Line totaled approximately $36,281 and $35,139 as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The available credit, including the accordion feature under the Line was $63,719 and $64,861 as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009, respectively. The Company believes the renewed Line will satisfy its letter of credit needs through fiscal 2011. The Company plans to renew the Line during fiscal 2011 and expects the renewal will satisfy their credit needs through fiscal 2011 and the foreseeable future. Wachovia Bank, National Association was acquired by Wells Fargo, effective January 1, 2009. The Wells Fargo acquisition did not affect the original line agreement.

8. Income Taxes

The components of income before income taxes are as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
  2010  2009  2008

Domestic

  $333,824  $297,747  $229,600

Foreign

   10,582   11,743   4,795
            
  $344,406  $309,490  $234,395
            

The components of the provision for income tax expense are as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 

Current:

    

Federal

  $107,350   $103,907   $66,000  

State

   13,216    15,037    9,936  

Foreign

   1,786    533    1,010  
             
   122,352    119,477    76,946  
             

Deferred:

    

Federal

   2,960    (7,917  (2,189

State

   (365  (462  (2,499

Foreign

   (434  (972  1,906  
             
   2,161    (9,351  (2,782
             
  $124,513   $110,126   $74,164  
             

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The Company’s effective tax rate was different than the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate for the following reasons:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 
      2010          2009          2008     

Expected provision at statutory U.S. federal tax rate

  35.0 35.0 35.0

State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit

  2.3   2.6   2.1  

Foreign taxes

  (0.6 (1.5 0.5  

Federal rehabilitation tax credits

  —     —     (5.0

Other

  (0.5 (0.5 (1.0
          

Effective tax rate

  36.2 35.6 31.6
          

The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of January 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

   January 31, 
   2010  2009 

Deferred tax liabilities:

   

Prepaid expenses

  $(815 $(1,407

Depreciation

   (32,181  (17,762
         

Gross deferred tax liabilities

   (32,996  (19,169
         

Deferred tax assets:

   

Deferred rent

   54,563    47,945  

Inventories

   5,575    5,582  

Accounts receivable

   772    626  

Net operating loss carryforwards

   4,795    2,760  

Tax uncertainties

   4,594    4,368  

Accrued salaries and benefits, and other

   8,549    5,586  
         

Gross deferred tax assets, before valuation allowances

   78,848    66,867  
         

Valuation allowances

   (2,196  (1,402
         

Net deferred tax assets

  $43,656   $46,296  
         

Net deferred tax assets are attributed to the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, $29,655 and $32,923 were attributable to U.S. federal, $11,632 and $11,392 were attributed to state jurisdictions and $2,369 and $1,981 were attributed to foreign jurisdictions.

As of January 31, 2010, certain non-U.S. subsidiaries of the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $6,282 that do not expire and certain U.S. subsidiaries of the Company had state net operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $12,518 that expire from 2015 through 2030. At January 31, 2010, the Company had a full valuation allowance for certain foreign net operating loss carryforwards where it was uncertain the

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

carryforwards would be utilized. The Company had no valuation allowance for certain other foreign net operating loss carryforwards where management believes it is more likely than not the tax benefit of these carryforwards will be realized. As of January 31, 2010 and 2009, the non-current portion of net deferred tax assets aggregated $31,379 and $40,378, respectively.

The cumulative amount of the Company’s share of undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries for which no deferred taxes have been provided was $35,986 as of January 31, 2010. These earnings are deemed to be permanently re-invested to finance growth programs.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

   January 31, 
  2010  2009  2008 

Balance at the beginning of the period

  $7,509   $7,805   $8,717  

Increases in tax positions for prior years

   948    24    227  

Decreases in tax positions for prior years

   (116  (380  (1,414

Increases in tax positions for current year

   1,894    838    917  

Settlements

   (924  (554  (345

Lapse in statute of limitations

   (1,779  (224  (297
             

Balance at the end of the period

  $7,532   $7,509   $7,805  
             

The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate were $6,039 and $6,389 at January 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The Company accrues interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income, which is consistent with the recognition of these items in prior reporting periods. During the years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized a benefit of $427 and $985 in interest and penalties. The Company had $3,182 and $3,609 for the payment of interest and penalties accrued at January 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In January 2010, the Company received an examination report from the IRS setting forth proposed adjustments to the Company’s U.S. income tax returns for the periods ended January 31, 2005 through 2008. The Company has submitted an appeal with respect to certain of the proposed adjustments. The timing for resolving such appeal to the IRS is uncertain. The Company is not subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years before fiscal 2004. State jurisdictions that remain subject to examination range from fiscal 2001 to 2009, with few exceptions. It is possible that these state examinations may be resolved within twelve months. Due to the potential for resolution of Federal appeals and state examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitation, it is possible that the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may change within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $3,195.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9. Share-Based Compensation

The Company’s 2008, 2004 and 2000 Stock Incentive Plans each authorize up to 10,000,000 common shares, which can be granted as restricted shares, unrestricted shares, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, performance shares or as stock appreciation rights. Grants under these plans generally expire seven or ten years from the date of grant, thirty days after termination, or six months after the date of death or termination due to disability. Stock options generally vest over a period of three or five years, with options becoming exercisable in installments determined by the administrator over the vesting period. However, options granted to non-employee directors generally vest over a period of one year. The Company’s 1997 Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”), which replaced the previous 1987, 1992 and 1993 Stock Option Plans (the “Superseded Plans”), expired during the year ended January 31, 2004. Individual grants outstanding under the 1997 Plan and certain of the Superseded Plans have expiration dates, which extend into fiscal year 2011. Grants under the 1997 Plan and the Superseded Plans generally expire ten years from the date of grant, thirty days after termination, or six months after the date of death or termination due to disability. As of January 31, 2010 there were 9,628,500, 1,035,150 and 119,900 common shares available for grant under the 2008, 2004 and 2000 Stock Incentive Plans, respectively.

The Company recorded $2,975, $2,481 and $2,124 of stock compensation expense related to stock option awards as well as related tax benefits of $1,034, $851 and $644 in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively or less than $0.01 for both basic and diluted earnings per share. During fiscal 2010, the Company granted 826,000 stock options. The estimated fair value of stock option grants was calculated using a Lattice Binomial option pricing model for the options granted during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009. For stock options granted during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2008, the fair value of these grants was calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model. Both the Lattice Binomial and Black Scholes option pricing models incorporate certain economic assumptions to value these share-based awards. The prevailing difference between the two models is the Lattice Binomial model’s ability to enhance the simple assumptions that underlie the Black Scholes model. The Lattice Binomial model allows for assumptions such as the risk-free rate of interest, volatility and exercise rate to vary over time reflecting a more realistic pattern of economic and behavioral occurrences. The Company uses historical data on exercise timing to determine the expected life assumption. The decrease in the expected life in fiscal year 2009 and forward is due to the fact that the majority of the grants issued in fiscal 2009 and 2010 expire in seven years. The risk-free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on U.S. Government Securities Treasury Constant Maturities over the expected term of the equity instrument. In fiscal years that utilize the Lattice Binomial option pricing model, the expected volatility is based on a weighted average of the implied volatility and the Company’s most recent historical volatility. In those fiscal years that utilized the Black Scholes option pricing model, the expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The table below outlines the weighted average assumptions for these grants:

   Fiscal
2010
  Fiscal
2009
  Fiscal
2008
 

Expected life, in years

  4.2   4.3   6.2  

Risk-free interest rate

  2.0 2.5 4.5

Volatility

  51.4 41.4 49.8

Dividend rate

  —     —     —    

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Based on the Company’s historical experience, the Company has assumed an annualized forfeiture rate of 5% for its unvested options granted during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010. For those options granted in previous years that remain unvested, an annualized forfeiture rate of 2% has been assumed. The Company will record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than it estimated, and will record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture is higher than estimated.

Total compensation cost of stock options granted but not yet vested, as of January 31, 2010, was $12,714, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.41 years.

The following tables summarize activity under all stock option plans for the respective periods:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
        2010              2009              2008      
  (In thousands, except per share data)

Weighted-average fair value of options granted per share

  $8.35  $10.56  $12.76

Intrinsic value of options exercised

  $16,613  $41,622  $23,610

Cash received from option exercises

  $3,250  $8,891  $5,000

Actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option exercises

  $6,390  $13,434  $7,341

Information regarding options under these plans is as follows:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2010
   Shares  Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

(1)

Options outstanding at beginning of year

   11,054,250   $19.64    

Options granted

   826,000    26.85    

Options exercised

   (846,283  3.84    

Options forfeited

   (256,010  34.24    

Options expired

   (135,190  30.51    
          

Options outstanding at end of year

   10,642,767    21.01  4.8  $118,204

Options outstanding expected to vest

   10,408,626    21.01  4.8  $115,604
          

Options exercisable at end of year

   8,958,867    19.12  4.5  $112,649
          

Weighted average fair value of options granted per share

  $8.35       
          

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The following table summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options as of January 31, 2010:

   Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable

Range of Exercise Prices

  Amount
Outstanding
  Wtd. Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  Wtd.
Avg.
Exercise
Price
  Amount
Exercisable
  Wtd.
Avg.
Exercise
Price

$  0.00 - $  3.75

  799,000  1.3  $1.63  799,000  $1.63

$  3.76 - $  7.50

  1,199,050  3.2   4.50  1,199,050   4.50

$  7.51 - $11.25

  204,000  1.9   9.21  204,000   9.21

$11.26 - $15.00

  2,500,800  4.4   14.26  2,500,800   14.26

$15.01 - $18.76

  422,500  5.4   17.03  160,000   15.38

$18.77 - $22.51

  245,667  6.5   20.70  90,000   19.69

$22.52 - $26.26

  361,000  5.8   24.21  311,667   24.20

$26.27 - $30.01

  308,000  5.5   28.15  298,000   28.11

$30.02 - $33.76 (1)

  3,588,500  5.9   31.16  3,196,500   31.09

$33.77 - $37.51

  1,014,250  5.6   37.31  199,850   37.31
            
  10,642,767  4.8   21.01  8,958,867   19.12
            

(1)Options included in this range contain certain restrictions on the sale of the stock which expire in November 2010.

Non-vested Shares

20The Company may make non-vested share awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. A non-vested share award is an award of common shares that is subject to certain restrictions during a specified period, such as an employee’s continued employment combined with the Company achieving certain financial goals. The Company holds the common shares during the restriction period, and the grantee cannot transfer the shares before the termination of that period. The grantee is, however, generally entitled to vote the common shares and receive any dividends declared and paid on the Company’s common shares during the restriction period.

Restricted Shares

During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, the Company granted 400,000 shares of restricted common stock with a grant date fair value of $5,766 or $14.42 per share. Share-based compensation expense of $442, $1,156 and $1,153 is included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income for each fiscal year ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of January 31, 2010, this grant was fully vested with no further expense to be recognized.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Performance Shares

In April 2008, the Company granted two separate awards of 30,184 Performance Stock Units (“PSU’s”) each. These PSU’s are subject to a vesting period of two years for the first grant (“Grant A”), and three years for the second grant (“Grant B”). Each PSU grant is subject to various company performance targets and an external market condition. If any of these criteria are not met, the grants are forfeited. Each PSU is equal to one share of common stock with a total award value not to exceed 30% appreciation. Grant A had a grant date fair value of $21.55 per share and Grant B had a grant date fair value of $19.47 per share, with both grants having a total grant date fair value of $1,238. The grant date fair value was calculated using a Lattice Binomial Model. The Company has not recognized compensation expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income related to these PSU awards during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010 and 2009 due to the high improbability of vesting based on the unlikely achievement of the performance criteria governing the grant. Grant A has been forfeited due to the performance criteria not being met as of January 31, 2010. The performance criteria achievement for Grant B will be re-measured at each reporting period, and if it is deemed likely that the performance targets will be achieved, any unrecognized compensation expense will be recognized prospectively.

In April 2009, the Company granted two separate awards of 54,466 PSU’s each. These PSU’s are subject to a vesting period of two years for the first grant (“Grant C”), and three years for the second grant (“Grant D”). Each PSU grant is subject to various company performance targets and an external market condition. If any of these targets are not met, the grants are forfeited. Each PSU is equal to one share of common stock with a total award value not to exceed 30% appreciation. Grant C had a grant date fair value of $12.22 per share and Grant D had a grant date fair value of $12.89 per share, with both grants having a total grant date fair value of $1,368. The grant date fair value was calculated using a Lattice Binomial Model. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 the Company has recognized related share-based compensation expense of $479 which is included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Total unrecognized compensation cost for these non-vested PSU’s granted as of January 31, 2010 was $889, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.3 years.

In November 2009, the Company granted an award of 1,000,000 PSU’s (“Grant E”). These PSU’s are subject to a performance period of seven years and are subject to various company performance targets and external market conditions. If any of these targets are not met, the grants are forfeited. Each PSU is equal to one share of common stock with the maximum award value of 1,000,000 shares subject to adjustment based on achievement of the performance criteria. Grant E had a grant date fair value of $25.56 per share and a total grant date fair value of $25,564. The grant date fair value was calculated using a Lattice Binomial Model. For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2010 the Company has recognized related share-based compensation expense of $870 which is included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Total unrecognized compensation cost for these non-vested PSU’s granted as of January 31, 2010 was $24,700 which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 6.0 years.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

10. Net Income Per Common Share

The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used for the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
  2010  2009  2008

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

  168,053,502  166,793,062  165,305,207

Effect of dilutive options and restricted stock

  3,176,743  4,067,543  4,335,378
         

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

  171,230,245  170,860,605  169,640,585
         

For the fiscal years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, options to purchase 4,331,650 shares ranging in price from $16.58 to $37.51, options to purchase 3,351,338 shares ranging in price from $16.58 to $37.51 and options to purchase 4,063,875 shares ranging in price from $22.11 to $31.11, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per common share for the respective fiscal years because the effect was anti-dilutive.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases its stores under non-cancelable operating leases. The following is a schedule by year of the future minimum lease payments for operating leases with original terms in excess of one year:

Fiscal Year

   

2011

  $139,562

2012

   142,791

2013

   143,549

2014

   135,030

2015

   126,629

Thereafter

   468,282
    

Total minimum lease payments

  $1,155,843
    

Amounts noted above include commitments for 22 executed leases for stores not opened as of January 31, 2010. The majority of our leases allow for renewal options between five and ten years upon expiration of the initial lease term. The store leases generally provide for payment of direct operating costs including real estate taxes. Certain store leases provide for contingent rentals when sales exceed specified levels. Additionally, the Company has entered into store leases that require a percentage of total sales to be paid to landlords in lieu of minimum rent.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Rent expense consisted of the following:

   Fiscal Year Ended January 31,
  2010  2009  2008

Minimum and percentage rentals

  $125,651  $112,907  $100,020

Contingent rentals

   3,327   1,993   3,282
            

Total

  $128,978  $114,900  $103,302
            

The Company also has commitments for un-fulfilled purchase orders for merchandise ordered from our vendors in the normal course of business, which are liquidated within 12 months, of $221,985. The majority of the Company’s merchandise commitments are cancellable with no or limited recourse available to the vendor until merchandise shipping date. The Company also has commitments related to contracts with construction contractors, fully liquidated upon the completion of construction, which is typically within 12 months, of $2,893.

Benefit Plan

Full and part-time U.S. based employees who are at least 18 years of age are eligible after six months of employment to participate in the Urban Outfitters 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). Under the Plan, employees can defer 1% to 25% of compensation as defined. The Company makes matching contributions in cash of $0.25 per employee contribution dollar on the first 6% of the employee contribution. The employees’ contribution is 100% vested while the Company’s matching contribution vests at 20% per year of employee service. The Company’s contributions were $1,171, $1,090 and $969 for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Contingencies

The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising from normal business activities. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

12. Related Party Transactions

Drinker Biddle & Reath, LLP (“DBR”), a law firm, provided general legal services to the Company. Fees paid to DBR during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $1,732, $2,670 and $3,662, respectively. Harry S. Cherken, Jr., a director of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of DBR. Fees due to DBR as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009 for services rendered were approximately $251 and $442, respectively.

The McDevitt Company, a real estate company, acted as a broker in substantially all of the Company’s new real estate transactions during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Company has not paid any compensation to The McDevitt Company, but the Company has been advised that The McDevitt Company has received commissions from other parties to such transactions. Wade L. McDevitt is the

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

president and the sole shareholder of The McDevitt Company and brother-in-law of Scott Belair, one of the Company’s directors. There were no amounts due to The McDevitt Company as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009. Mr. McDevitt’s wife, Wendy B. McDevitt, is an executive officer of the Company, serving as Co-President of Anthropologie.

The Addis Group (“Addis”), an insurance brokerage company, acted as the Company’s commercial insurance broker for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Company has not paid any compensation to Addis for such services, but has been advised that Addis has received commissions from other parties to such transactions, to serve as risk manager under one line of coverage. Scott Addis is the President of The Addis Group and the brother-in-law of Richard A. Hayne, Chairman of the Board and President of the Company. There were no amounts due to or from Addis as of January 31, 2010 and January 31, 2009.

13. Segment Reporting

The Company is a global retailer of lifestyle-oriented general merchandise with two reporting segments—“Retail” and “Wholesale”. The Company’s Retail segment consists of the aggregation of its four brands operating through 327 stores under the retail names “Urban Outfitters,” “Anthropologie,” “Free People” and “Terrain” and includes their direct marketing campaigns which consist of three catalogs and five web sites as of January 31, 2010. Our Retail stores and their direct marketing campaigns are considered operating segments. Net sales from the Retail segment accounted for more than 94% of total consolidated net sales for the years ended January 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The remainder is derived from the Company’s Wholesale segment that manufactures and distributes apparel to the retail segment and to approximately 1,400 better department and specialty retailers worldwide.

The Company has aggregated its retail stores and associated direct marketing campaigns into a Retail segment based upon their shared management, customer base and economic characteristics. Reporting in this format provides management with the financial information necessary to evaluate the success of the segments and the overall business. The Company evaluates the performance of the segments based on the net sales and pre-tax income from operations (excluding inter-company charges) of the segment. Corporate expenses include expenses incurred and directed by the corporate office that are not allocated to segments. The principal identifiable assets for each operating segment are inventories and property and equipment. Other assets are comprised primarily of general corporate assets, which principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other assets, and which are typically not allocated to the Company’s segments. The Company accounts for inter-segment sales and transfers as if the sales and transfers were made to third parties making similar volume purchases.

URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the policies described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” Both the retail and wholesale segments are highly diversified. No customer comprises more than 10% of sales. A summary of the information about the Company’s operations by segment is as follows:

   Fiscal Year 
   2010  2009  2008 

Net sales

    

Retail operations

  $1,833,733   $1,724,558   $1,413,251  

Wholesale operations

   109,269    120,364    102,479  

Intersegment elimination

   (5,187  (10,304  (8,006
             

Total net sales

  $1,937,815   $1,834,618   $1,507,724  
             

Income from operations

    

Retail operations

  $338,114   $297,572   $219,248  

Wholesale operations

   22,164    28,170    21,438  

Intersegment elimination

   (202  (11,209  (1,325
             

Total segment operating income

   360,076    314,533    239,361  

General corporate expenses

   (21,092  (15,098  (14,416
             

Total income from operations

  $338,984   $299,435   $224,945  
             

Depreciation expense for property and equipment

    

Retail operations

  $85,077   $78,892   $68,123  

Wholesale operations

   1,069    613    615  
             

Total depreciation expense for property and equipment

  $86,146   $79,505   $68,738  
             

Inventories

    

Retail operations

  $178,567   $157,030   

Wholesale operations

   7,563    12,668   
          

Total inventories

  $186,130   $169,698   
          

Property and equipment, net

    

Retail operations

  $535,248   $500,650   

Wholesale operations

   4,713    4,757   
          

Total property and equipment, net

  $539,961   $505,407   
          

Cash paid for property and equipment

    

Retail operations

  $107,941   $111,658   $113,914  

Wholesale operations

   1,319    895    1,456  
             

Total cash paid for property and equipment

  $109,260   $112,553   $115,370  
             

The Company has foreign operations in Europe and Canada. Revenues and long-lived assets, based upon our domestic and foreign operations, are as follows:

   Fiscal Year
   2010  2009  2008

Net sales

      

Domestic operations

  $1,752,787  $1,663,616  $1,373,162

Foreign operations

   185,028   171,002   134,562
            

Total net sales

  $1,937,815  $1,834,618  $1,507,724
            

Property and equipment, net

      

Domestic operations

  $470,401  $460,551  

Foreign operations

   69,560   44,856  
          

Total property and equipment, net

  $539,961  $505,407  
          

F-30