UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K/A10-K
(Mark One)
þ
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

or

o
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________________
Commission file number: 001-32442
For the transition period from __________________ to __________________________
Commission file number: 001-32442

INUVO, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 87-0450450
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

111 Main Street,
500 President Clinton Ave., Suite 201, Conway,300, Little Rock, AR 7203272201
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)code (501) 205-8508
 
Securities registered under Section 12(b)12(b) of the Act:

Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common StockNYSE MKT

Securities registered under Section 12(g)12(g) of the Act:

None
(Title of class)

(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. oo Yes þNo

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. oo Yes þNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þþ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Corporatecorporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þþ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. oþ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company:

Large accelerated fileroAccelerated filero
Non-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) oo Yes þNo

The aggregate market value of the outstanding common stock, other than shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price for the registrant’s common stock on June 28, 201330, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), as reported on the NYSE MKT, was approximately $18.6$28.9 million.

As of February 28, 2014,10, 2017, there were 23,509,03628,443,577 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding.



EXPLANATORY NOTEDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/APortions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to the Annual Report on Form 10-Kbe filed within 120 days of Inuvo, Inc. the year ended December 31, 2013, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2013 (the "2013 10-K") is being filed solely for the purpose of including the information required2016, are hereby incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We no longer anticipate filing its definitive proxy statement within 120 days of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Therefore, such information will not be incorporated by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Accordingly, Part III, Items 10 through 14, of the 2013 10-K are hereby amended and restated in their entirety.


As required by Rule 12b-15, in connection with this Form 10-K/A, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reissued applicable portions of their Rule 13a-14(a) certifications. Accordingly, Part IV, Item 15 has been amended to reflect the filing of such certifications herewith.TABLE OF CONTENTS

Except as described above, this Form 10-K/A does not modify or update disclosure in, or exhibits to, the 2013 10-K. Furthermore, this Form 10-K/A does not change any previously reported financial results, nor does it reflect events occurring after the date of the 2013 10-K. Information not affected by this Form 10-K/A remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time the 2013 10-K was filed.
Page No.
Part I
Item 1.Business.
Item 1A.Risk Factors.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
Item 2.Properties.
Item 3.Legal Proceedings.
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures.
Part II
Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Item 6.Selected Financial Data.
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Item 9.Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Item 9B.Other Information.
Part III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Item 11.Executive Compensation.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Part IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.


2


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “will,” “should,” “intend,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. This report includes, among others, statements regarding our:

history of losses;
material dependence on our relationships with Yahoo! and Google;
dependence on our financing arrangements with Bridge Bank, N.A. which are collateralized by our assets;
covenants and restrictions in our grant agreement with the state of Arkansas;
possible need to raise additional capital;
dependence of our Partner Network segment on relationships with distribution partners;
introduction of new products and services, which require significant investment;
dependence of our Owned and Operated Network segment on our ability to maintain and grow our customer base and the estimates and assumptions we use in that segment;
ability to acquire traffic through other search engines;
lack of control over content and functionality of advertisements we display from third-party networks;
ability to effectively compete;
need to keep pace with technology changes;
fluctuations in our quarterly earnings and the trading price of our common stock;
possible interruptions of services;
dependence on third-party providers;
liability associated with retrieved or transmitted information, failure to adequately protect personal information; security breaches and computer viruses, and other risks experienced by companies in our industry;
dependence on key personnel;
regulatory and legal uncertainties;
ability to defend our company against lawsuits;
failure to protect our intellectual property;
risks from publishers who could fabricate clicks;
continued listing on the NYSE MKT; and
outstanding restricted stock grants warrants and options and potential dilutive impact to our stockholders.
material dependence on our relationships with Yahoo! and Google;
dependence of our Partner Network segment on relationships with distribution partners, and on the introduction of new products and services, which require significant investment;
dependence of our Owned and Operated Network segment on our ability to effectively market and attract traffic;
need to keep pace with technology changes;
fluctuations of quarterly financial results and the trading price of our common stock;
vulnerability to interruptions of services;
dependence on key personnel;
vulnerability to regulatory and legal uncertainties and our ability to comply with applicable laws and regulations;
need to protect our intellectual property;
vulnerability to publishers who could fabricate clicks;
vulnerability to a downturn and to uncertainty in global economic conditions;
integration of our recent NetSeer asset acquisition.
dependence on our financing arrangements with Western Alliance Bank, which is collateralized by our assets;
requirement to adhere to the covenants and restrictions in our grant agreement with the state of Arkansas;
the dilutive impact to our stockholders from outstanding restricted stock grants, warrants and options; and
the seasonality of our business.

These forward-looking statements were based on various factors and were derived utilizing numerous assumptions and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Most of these factors are difficult to predict accurately and are generally beyond our control. You should consider the areas of risk described in connection with any forward-looking statements that may be made herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and readers should carefully review this report in its entirety, including the risks described in Item 1A - Risk Factors appearing in our 2013 10-K.this report.

Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this report the terms "Inuvo," the “Company,” "we," "us," "our" and similar terms refer to Inuvo, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries including Vertro, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Vertro”).subsidiaries. When used in this report, “2012”“2015” means the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, "2013"2015, "2016" means the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013,2016, and “2014”“2017” means the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.2017. The information which appears on our corporate web site at www.inuvo.com is not part of this report.



3PART I


ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Company Overview

Inuvo, Inc. is an internet advertising technology and digital publishing company incorporated in the state of Nevada. Our corporate office is located in Little Rock, Arkansas. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “INUV.”

We develop technology that delivers content and advertisements over the internet. We develop direct to consumer marketing technology to acquire consumers for our content. We develop analytics and optimization technologies to align advertisements with consumers. We generate revenue when an end user clicks on or views the advertisements we delivered. We manage our business as two segments, the Partner Network (advertising technology) and the Owned and Operated Network (digital publishing). In 2016 and 2015, the Partner Network represented 36% and 43% of total revenue and the Owned and Operated Network 64% and 57%, respectively.

Within the Partner Network, we recruit online publishers and provide them an advertising delivery service, the primary brands for which are ValidClick and SearchLinks©. This service allows publishers the ability to place Inuvo ad-technology in various locations and configurations within their website or app for either a desktop or mobile implementation. We generate revenue in this segment when an advertisement that is delivered is subsequently clicked on by a consumer. Advertisements can be served by either Inuvo or a third party depending on the needs of the publisher. Typically, we collect revenue from advertisers when an advertisement is clicked and then share a portion of the revenue with the publisher. We deliver well in excess of a billion such advertisements annually.

The Owned and Operated Network designs, builds and markets consumer websites and applications. This segment consists of our main online property marketed under the ALOT brand and a number of other websites targeted at specific demographics like EARNSPENDLIVE and sites designed specifically for generating leads in a specific market vertical like ASKTHIS for automotive. The majority of revenue generated by this segment is derived from advertisements that have been delivered on web pages that include both ALOT content and advertisements. Our ALOT branded websites and applications have a broad appeal focusing on popular topics such as health, finance, careers, local search, travel, living, education and auto.

We have a number of highly differentiated and proprietary strengths that include long standing advertising relationships with Yahoo and Google from whom we source advertising inventory which we distribute through our own online properties or through those of third party publishers;
the ability to serve hundreds of millions of advertisements to any device or browser in milliseconds;
the power to both self-market and self-monetize our own publishing business;
the capability to test advertising technology within our own publishing business;
the power to target advertisements based on website content, past behavior or to redirect users back to Inuvo content when the economics and alignment are optimized;
the capacity to expand to other geographies where appropriate;
the capability to develop and publish content just-in-time to meet demand from advertisers; and
a low cost operation in central Arkansas with access to numerous universities, and a proprietary technology infrastructure developed by, and in some cases patented by Inuvo.

We plan to continue growing our website and mobile application business by expanding the ALOT brand and acquiring new websites where appropriate. We plan to continue to distribute SearchLinks broadly throughout the Internet by growing our network of publishers. Financially, we are focused on growth while maintaining a positive cash flow. We expect to continue to make strategic investments principally in these areas: marketing technology associated with direct to consumer acquisition; the SearchLinks platform, and advertising targeting analytics.


Products and Services

SearchLinks: A proprietary platform to deliver ads to digital publisher webpages and apps using natural language technology to identify a site’s content, subject matter and context. It serves advertisements with text, images or video with a high relevancy to the identified content. The technology decides whether to serve the contextual advertisement or a behavioral advertisement based upon the greater monetization. The platform allows publishers to visualize the performance of advertising on their pages and manages the remuneration associated with that advertising.



ValidClick: A legacy software as a service and delivery platform that is being replaced by the SearchLinks platform. It offers a pay-per-click solution where advertisements are targeted to consumers based on content and behaviors.

MYAP: A proprietary online affiliate management solution that provides advertisers with the ability to sign up, manage and track the activities of publishers through a privately-branded platform with full data transparency. Typically, each MYAP customer is supported by a customized software implementation.

ALOT: Branded web properties with content developed, edited and published by ALOT in categories like health, finance, travel, entertainment, careers, education and automotive.

Key Relationships

We maintain long-standing relationships with Yahoo! and Google that provide access to hundreds of thousands of advertisers from which the revenue we generate originates. When an advertisement within either our Partner Network or Owned and Operated Network is clicked, we effectively sell that click to these partners who then sell it to the advertisers. We maintain multi-year service contracts with both companies. We have extended the Google agreement through February 2017 and the Yahoo! agreement, through May 31, 2018. In 2016, these two customers accounted for 98.3% of our total revenue.

In addition to our key customer relationships, in the Partner Network we maintain important distribution relationships with owners and publishers of websites and mobile applications. Through our relationship with Yahoo! we provide these partners with advertisements through which they monetize their websites and mobile applications. We continuously monitor our partners' traffic with a variety of proprietary and patent protected software tools that can determine the quality of the traffic that is viewing and clicking on served advertisements.

Strategy

We believe we have a competitive advantage due to possessing three essential components of the end-to-end digital advertising ecosystem. Content: Virtually all the content we display on our sites is owned and developed by us. Our in-house team of writers and marketers develop material that attracts traffic to our internet properties. Marketing: The marketing of web properties and apps is a sophisticated, data-driven, statistical endeavor that requires expert analysts and statisticians as well as experienced marketing professionals. We believe our team and our marketing partners are among the best in the industry. Technology: We have state-of-the-art ad serving technology developed over the past ten years by our expert team of IT professionals. The technology assures instant ad serving of targeted ads which we believe yields high returns on investment, or ROIs, for publishers and more sales for advertisers. Owning these three assets gives us better control over our business and higher margins as we do not have the expense of outsourcing.

Our strategy has been to build an audience for our content so we can use our digital publishing business as a factory for sophisticated ad-technology development. By owning our own websites, we can adapt our ad-technology to any configuration while optimizing ad-targeting algorithms. Once we are satisfied that this ad-technology works well in our environment, we then commercialize it, selling it to other website publishers like us. This approach to ad-technology development reduces the time to market and improves the odds of success in-market.

Our ad-technology strategy has been to 1) develop technology that can target ads based on the content of a page; 2) develop technology that can target ads based on a past behavior, and 3) develop technology capable of redirecting ads to our branded digital content.

Sales and Marketing

We drive general awareness of our brands through various marketing channels including our websites, social media, blogs, public relations, trade shows, conferences and similar means. Marketing for our products differs by segment.

The Partner Network employs sales professionals that build and maintain relationships with advertisers and partners. Owners and publishers of websites and mobile applications are recruited into our network, serving as a delivery vehicle for the advertisements within this segment.

The Owned and Operated Network uses various marketing and optimization techniques to drive traffic and build awareness for the sites, engaging with various direct and indirect advertisers whose offers are placed on the sites and within the apps.







Competition

We face significant competition in our industry. Competitors are increasing their suite of offerings across marketing channels as a means to better compete for total advertising dollars.

A significant number of our competitors in both segments have greater name recognition and are better capitalized than we are. Our ability to remain competitive in our market segment depends upon our ability to be innovative and to efficiently provide unique solutions to our customers and vendors. There are no assurances we will be able to remain competitive in our markets in the future.

Partner Network

Success in the Partner Network is dependent on recruiting and retaining owners and publishers of websites and mobile applications who display our advertisements. We believe our proprietary software platform, the ability to quickly implement and provide new services, and the access to thousands of advertisements are significant advantages for us in building our partner base. Our competitors include companies with direct access to advertisers, such as Yahoo! and Google, Criteo SA, Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC, Taboola, Inc., Outbrain Inc. and a number of companies like ours with access to advertisers. Our partners face few barriers to switching advertising technology providers, so to compete effectively we must offer a better service than our competitors with a competitive rate of return for our partners.

Owned and Operated Network

Consumers have many choices in online content, and we believe that our success in the Owned and Operated Network is directly tied to our ability to provide easy access to valuable content and market it effectively. Our experience in search engine marketing, social media advertising and the creation of proprietary content helps us compete in this segment. We have many direct competitors, including Google, Yahoo!, WebMD LLC, Internet Brands, Inc., Leaf Group Ltd. and others, all of which offer online media or entertainment through websites, mobile apps or software products.

Technology Platforms

Our proprietary applications are constructed from established, readily available technologies. Some of the basic elements our products are built on components from leading software and hardware providers such as Oracle, Microsoft, Sun, Dell, EMC, and Cisco, while some components are constructed from leading Open Source software projects such as Apache Web Server, MySQL, Java, Perl, and Linux. By seeking to strike the proper balance between using commercially available software and Open Source software, our technology expenditures are directed toward maintaining our technology platforms while minimizing third-party technology supplier costs.

We strive to build high-performance, availability and reliability into our product offerings. We safeguard against the potential for service interruptions at our third-party technology vendors by engineering controls into our critical components. We deliver our hosted solutions from facilities, geographically disbursed throughout the United States. Our applications are monitored 24 hours a day, 365 days a year by specialized monitoring systems that aggregate alarms to a human-staffed network operations center. If a problem occurs, appropriate engineers are notified and corrective action is taken.

Intellectual Property Rights

We currently rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. Our success depends on the protection of the proprietary aspects of our technology as well as our ability to operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. We also enter into proprietary information and confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and commercial partners and control access to, and distribution of, our software documentation and other proprietary information. We have registered a number of trademarks including ValidClick®, ValidClick AdExchange®, MyAP®, Second Bite®, Kowa!Bunga®, Inuvo®, Zubican™, LocalXML™, Yellowise™, SearchLinks™ and trade and service registrations related to our products or services, including U.S. Federal Registration for ALOT® in the United States.

As of the date of this report we own two patents issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and have applied for a provisional patent to protect the technology that drives the SearchLinks process and algorithms:



"System and Method for Enabling Information Associations" which was issued on April 1, 2008, and the expiration date of which as determined based on patent term adjustment as calculated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") is September 11, 2021.
"Method for Preventing Real Time Click Fraud Detection, Prevention and Reporting for Online Advertising" which was issued on November 27, 2012, and the expiration date of which is January 22, 2030, as determined based on patent term adjustment as calculated by the USPTO.
The applied for SearchLinks provisional patent relates to pairing relevant advertisements with established web page content and more particularly to processing page content and retrieving relevant advertisements based on optimal comparisons and scoring criteria.

Although patents are only one component of the protection of intellectual property rights, if our patent applications are challenged, it may result in increased competition and the development of products substantially similar to our own. In addition, it is difficult to monitor unauthorized use of technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States, and our competitors may independently develop technology similar to our own. We will continue to assess appropriate occasions for seeking patent and other intellectual property protections for those aspects of our technology that we believe constitute innovations providing significant competitive advantages.

In addition to www.inuvo.com, we own multiple domain names that we may or may not operate in the future. However, as with phone numbers, we do not have and cannot acquire any property rights in an Internet address. The regulation of domain names in the United States and in other countries is also subject to change. Regulatory bodies could establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars or modify the requirements for holding domain names. As a result, we might not be able to maintain our domain names or obtain comparable domain names, which could harm our business.

Employees

As of January 31, 2017, we had 61 full-time employees, none of which are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Seasonality

Our future results of operations may be subject to fluctuation as a result of seasonality. Historically, in the later part of the fourth quarter and the earlier part of the first quarter we experience lower Revenue Per Click (“RPC”) due to a decline in demand for inventory on websites and apps and the recalibrating of advertiser’s marketing budgets after the holiday selling season. If we are not able to appropriately adjust to seasonal or other factors, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

History

We were incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in October 1987 and operated within the oil and gas industry. This endeavor was not profitable, and from 1993 to 1997 we had essentially no operations. In 1997 we reorganized and through 2006 we acquired a number of companies involved in advertising and internet marketing. In 2009, following the weakness in the economy, a new team was called in to assess the array of businesses that had been acquired in the preceding years and as a result between 2009 and 2011, we sold or retired eleven businesses.

In March 2012, as part of a long-term strategy, we acquired Vertro, Inc. ("Vertro"), which owns and operates the ALOT product portfolio. This acquisition included the ALOT brand, as well as a long-standing relationship with Google. In 2013, with a grant funded by the State of Arkansas, we moved the headquarters to Arkansas where we have remained.

More Information

Our web site address is www.inuvo.com. We file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, as well as various other information. This information can be found on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, we make available free of charge through the Investor Relations page of our web site our annual reports, quarterly reports, and current reports, and all amendments to any of those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after providing such reports to the SEC.



ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

An investment in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk. You should not invest in our common stock unless you can afford to lose your entire investment. You should consider carefully the following risk factors and other information in this report before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected and you could lose your entire investment in our company.

We rely on two customers for a significant portion of our revenues. We are reliant upon Yahoo! and Google for most of our revenue. During 2016 they accounted for 68.6% and 29.7% of our revenues, respectively, and during 2015 they accounted for 64.8% and 33.2%, respectively. The amount of revenue we receive from these customers is dependent on a number of factors outside of our control, including the amount they charge for advertisements, the depth of advertisements available from them, and their ability to display relevant ads in response to our end-user queries.

We would likely experience a significant decline in revenue and our business operations could be significantly harmed if these customers do not approve our new websites and applications, or if we violate their guidelines or they change their guidelines. In addition, if any of these preceding circumstances were to occur, we may not be able to find a suitable alternate paid search results provider or otherwise replace the lost revenues. The loss of either of these customers or a material change in the revenue or gross profit they generate would have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition in future periods.

We are dependent upon relationships with and the success of our distribution partners. Our distribution partners are very important to the success of the Partner Network segment. We must recruit and maintain partners who are able to drive traffic successfully to their websites and mobile applications, resulting in clicks on advertisements we have delivered. These partners may experience difficulty in attracting and maintaining users for a number of reasons, including competition, rapidly changing markets and technology, industry consolidation and changing consumer preferences. Further, we may not be able to further develop and maintain relationships with distribution partners. They may be able to make their own deals directly with advertisers, may view us as competitors or may find our competitors offerings more desirable. Any of these potential events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

The success of our Owned and Operated Network business is dependent on our ability to acquire traffic in a profitable manner. The Owned and Operated Network operates our ALOT-branded websites. This segment is dependent on our ability to attract traffic to our sites in a profitable manner. We use a predictive model to calculate the rate of return for marketing campaigns, which includes estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and assumptions are not accurate, we may not be able to effectively manage our marketing decisions and could acquire traffic in an unprofitable manner. In addition, we may not be able to maintain and grow our traffic for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, acceptance of our websites by consumers, the availability of advertising to promote our websites, competition, and sufficiency of capital to purchase advertising. We advertise on search engine websites to drive traffic to our owned and operated websites. Our keyword advertising is done primarily with Google, but also with Yahoo! and Bing. If we are unable to maintain and grow traffic to our sites in a profitable manner, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business must keep pace with rapid technological change to remain competitive. Our business operates in a market characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product and service announcements, enhancements, and changing customer demands. We must adapt to rapidly changing technologies and industry standards and continually improve the speed, performance, features, ease of use and reliability of our services. This includes making our products and services compatible and maintaining compatibility with multiple operating systems, desktop and mobile devices, and evolving network infrastructure. If we fail to do this, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected.

Our quarterly operating results can be difficult to predict and can fluctuate substantially, which could result in volatility in the price of our common stock. Our quarterly revenues and other operating results have varied in the past and are likely to continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. Our agreements with distribution partners and key customers do not require minimum levels of usage or payments, and our revenues therefore fluctuate based on the actual usage of our service each quarter by existing and new distribution partners. Quarterly fluctuations in our operating results also might be due to numerous other factors, including:
 
our ability to attract new distribution partners, including the length of our sales cycles, or to sell increased usage of our service to existing distribution partners;


technical difficulties or interruptions in our services;
changes in privacy protection and other governmental regulations applicable to our industry;
changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors;
the financial condition and business success of our distribution partners;
purchasing and budgeting cycles of our distribution partners;
acquisitions of businesses and products by us or our competitors;
competition, including entry into the market by new competitors or new offerings by existing competitors;
discounts offered to advertisers by upstream advertising networks;
our history of litigation;
our ability to hire, train and retain sufficient sales, client management and other personnel;
timing of development, introduction and market acceptance of new services or service enhancements by us or our competitors;
concentration of marketing expenses for activities such as trade shows and advertising campaigns;
expenses related to any new or expanded data centers; and
general economic and financial market conditions.

Our services may be interrupted if we experience problems with our network infrastructure. The performance of our network infrastructure is critical to our business and reputation. Because our services are delivered solely through the internet, our network infrastructure could be disrupted by a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

unexpected increases in usage of our services;
computer viruses and other security issues;
interruption or other loss of connectivity provided by third-party internet service providers;
natural disasters or other catastrophic events; and
server failures or other hardware problems.

While we have data centers in multiple, geographically dispersed locations and active back-up and disaster recovery plans, we cannot assure you that serious interruptions will not occur in the future. If our services were to be interrupted, it could cause loss of users, customers and business partners, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

We depend on key personnel, the loss of whom could harm our business. Our success depends in part on the retention of personnel critical to our business operations. Loss of key personnel may result in disruption of operations, loss of key business relationships or expertise, additional recruiting and training costs, and diminished anticipated benefits of acquisitions. Our future success is substantially dependent on the continued service of our key senior management. We have experienced difficulty from time to time in attracting or retaining the personnel necessary to support the growth of our business, and we may experience similar difficulties in the future.

Regulatory and legal uncertainties could harm our business. While there are currently relatively few laws or regulations directly applicable to internet-based commerce or commercial search activity, there is increasing awareness of such activity and interest from state and federal lawmakers in regulating these services. New regulation of activities in which we are involved or the extension of existing laws and regulations to internet-based services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial position.

Failure to comply with federal, state and international privacy laws and regulations, or the expansion of current or the enactment of new privacy laws or regulations, could adversely affect our business. A variety of federal, state and international laws and regulations govern the collection, use, retention, sharing and security of consumer data. The existing privacy-related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations. In addition, various federal, state and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws regarding privacy matters. For example, recently there have been Congressional hearings and increased attention to the capture and use of location-based information relating to users of smartphones and other mobile devices. We have posted privacy policies and practices concerning the collection, use and disclosure of subscriber data on our websites and applications. Several Internet companies have incurred penalties for failing to abide by the representations made in their privacy policies and practices. In addition, several states have adopted legislation that requires businesses to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect sensitive personal information and to provide notice to consumers in the event of a security breach. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or with any data-related consent orders, FTC requirements or orders or other federal, state or international privacy or consumer protection-related laws, regulations or industry self-regulatory principles could result in claims, proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others or other liabilities, which could adversely affect our business.



We may face third party intellectual property infringement claims that could be costly to defend and result in the loss of significant rights. From time to time third parties have asserted infringement claims against us including copyright, trademark and patent infringement, among other things. While we believe that we have defenses to these types of claims under appropriate trademark laws, we may not prevail in our defenses to any intellectual property infringement claims. In addition, we may not be adequately insured for any judgments awarded in connection with any litigation. Any such claims and resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages or result in the invalidation of our proprietary rights, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Even if we were to prevail, these claims could be time-consuming, expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of management's time and attention.

We are subject to risks from publishers who could fabricate clicks either manually or technologically. Our business involves the establishment of relationships with website owners and publishers. In exchange for their consumer traffic, we provide an advertising placement service and share a portion of the revenue we collect with that website publisher. Although we have click fraud detection software in place, we cannot guarantee that we will identify all fraudulent clicks or be able to recover funds distributed for fabricated clicks. This risk could materially impact our ability to borrow, our cash flow and the stability of our business.

Our business is seasonal and our financial results may vary significantly from period to period. Our future results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year because of numerous factors, including seasonality. Historically, in the later part of the fourth quarter and the earlier part of the first quarter we experience lower Revenue Per Click (“RPC”) due to a decline in demand for inventory on website and app space and the recalibrating of advertiser’s marketing budgets after the holiday selling season. If we are not able to appropriately adjust to seasonal or other factors, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

A downturn or uncertainty in global economic conditions may have a significant negative effect on our access to credit and our ability to raise capital and may impact our business, operating results or financial condition. A future downturn or uncertainty in global economic conditions, may result in significant reductions in, and heightened credit quality standards for, available capital and liquidity from banks and other providers of credit and substantial reductions and/or fluctuations in equity and currency values worldwide, which may make it difficult for us to raise additional capital or obtain additional credit, when needed, on acceptable terms or at all. Moreover, deteriorated economic conditions, or the threat of a prolonged recessionary period, may cause disruptions and volatility in global financial markets, increased rates of default and bankruptcy and have a negative impact on the levels of consumer spending. These macroeconomic developments could negatively affect our business, operating results or financial condition in a number of ways. For example, current or potential customers, such as advertisers, may delay or decrease spending with us or may not pay us or may delay paying us for previously performed services. In addition, if consumer spending decreases, this may result in fewer clicks on our advertisers’ ads displayed on our Owned and Operated Network websites or our Partner Network websites.
We must successfully integrate the business of NetSeer.
We have recently purchased substantially all the assets of Silicon Valley based NetSeer, Inc., a provider of visual monetization solutions for advertisers and publishers. The integration of the NetSeer businesses may be difficult, time consuming and costly. The integration may divert our management’s time and resources from the operation of our core businesses. Our integration efforts may not be completed as planned, may take longer to complete or may be more costly than anticipated, or the acquired business may not achieve its expected results, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Additionally, if the acquired business is unable to achieve its expected results, there is risk of an impairment of the assets acquired, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions in our credit facility could impact our ability to access capital as needed. We have a credit facility with Western Alliance Bank ("Western Alliance Bank"), the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A. our original lender, under which we had zero in debt outstanding as of December 31, 2016. The credit facility contains a number of covenants that requires us and certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

pay fees to the lender associated with the credit facility;
meet prescribed financial covenants;
maintain our corporate existence in good standing;
grant the lender a security interest in our assets;
provide financial information to the lender; and
refrain from any transfer of any of our business or property, subject to customary exceptions.


We have historically had difficulties meeting the financial covenants set forth in our credit agreement. Our lender has given us waivers in the past and reset our financial covenants several times. In the event of a breach of our covenants we cannot provide any assurance that our lender would provide a waiver or reset our covenants. A breach in our covenants could result in a default under the credit facility, and in such event Western Alliance Bank could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding, if any, to be due and payable. If this occurs and we have outstanding obligations and are not able to repay, Western Alliance Bank could require us to apply all of our available cash to repay the debt amounts and could then proceed against the underlying collateral. Should this occur, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay our debt in full, we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance the debt, or that we would be able to obtain a waiver to cure any such default. In such an event, our ability to conduct our business as it is currently conducted would be in jeopardy.

Failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions in our grant agreement with the State of Arkansas could result in the repayment of a portion of the grant, which we may not be able to repay or finance on favorable terms. In January 2013, we entered into an agreement with the State of Arkansas whereby we were granted $1,750,000 for the relocation of the Company to Arkansas and for the purchase of equipment. The grant was contingent upon us having at least 50 full-time equivalent permanent positions within four years, maintaining at least 50 full-time equivalent permanent positions for the following six years and paying those positions an average total compensation of $90,000 per year. As of December 31, 2016, the grant required we have 50 employees located in Arkansas and on December 31, 2016 we had 52 employees located in Arkansas.
If we fail to meet the requirements of the grant after the initial four-year period, we may be required to repay a portion of the grant, up to but not to exceed the full amount of the grant. Should this occur, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay our grant in full, we would be able to borrow sufficient funds to refinance the grant, or that we would be able to obtain a waiver to cure any such default. In such an event, our ability to conduct our business as it is currently conducted would be in jeopardy.

Significant dilution will occur if outstanding warrants and options are exercised or restricted stock unit grants vest. As of December 31, 2016, we had warrants and stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 315,970 shares with exercise prices ranging from $0.56 to $3.70 per share, with a weighted average exercise price of $2.52. We also had 755,507 restricted stock units outstanding. If outstanding warrants and stock options are exercised or restricted stock units vest, dilution will occur to our stockholders, which may be significant. See Note 2 to the financial statements for more details.

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES.
Our corporate headquarters are located in Little Rock, Arkansas. We entered into a five-year agreement to lease office space on October 1, 2015. The lease is for 12,245 square feet.

In addition to our office space, we maintain data center operations in third-party collocation facilities in Little Rock, AR and San Jose, CA.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

None

ITEM 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKT under the symbol "INUV."  The following table sets forth the reported high and low prices for our common stock for the following periods.


 High Low
Year Ended December 31, 2016: 
  
First Quarter$2.77
 $1.67
Second Quarter$2.13
 $1.33
Third Quarter$1.78
 $1.05
Fourth Quarter$2.31
 $1.00
Year Ended December 31, 2015 
  
First Quarter$2.14
 $1.04
Second Quarter$3.57
 $1.81
Third Quarter$3.29
 $2.19
Fourth Quarter$3.25
 $2.55

As of February 10, 2017, the last reported sale price of the common stock on NYSE MKT was $1.60 and there were approximately 403 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock since our inception. Under Nevada law, we are prohibited from paying dividends if the distribution would result in our company not being able to pay its debts as they become due in the normal course of business if our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to pay the dividends, or if we were to be dissolved at the time of distribution to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, the frequency, and the amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. While our board of directors will make any future decisions regarding dividends, as circumstances surrounding us change, it currently does not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers(1)

The following tabular summary reflects the Company’s share repurchase activity during the year ended December 31, 2016:

Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
Maximum number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2)
December 9 - December 31 15,883
 $1.42
 15,883
 $477,498
Total 15,883
 
 15,883
 477,498
(1)All shares were purchased under the Company’s current share repurchase program, which was announced on December 9, 2016 and authorizes the repurchase of the Company’s common stock totaling $500,000. Under the authorization, the Company may purchase shares from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. However, the timing and amount of such purchases, if any, would be at the discretion of management and would depend upon market conditions and other considerations.

(2) This amount reflects the dollar value of shares remaining available to repurchase under the previously announced plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.



ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Company Overview
Inuvo, Inc. is an internet advertising technology and digital publishing company.

We develop technology that delivers content and advertisements over the internet. We develop direct to consumer marketing technology to acquire consumers for our content. We develop analytics and optimization technologies to align advertisements with consumers. We generate revenue when an end user clicks on the advertisements we delivered. We manage our business as two segments, the Partner Network (advertising technology) and the Owned and Operated Network (digital publishing).
Within the Partner Network, we recruit online publishers and provide them an advertising delivery service, the primary brand for which is SearchLinks©. This service allows publishers the ability to place Inuvo ad-technology in various locations and configurations within their website or app for either a desktop or mobile implementation. We generate revenue in this segment when an advertisement that is delivered is subsequently clicked on by a consumer. Advertisements can be served by either Inuvo or a third party depending on the needs of the publisher. Typically, we collect revenue from advertisers when an advertisement is clicked and then share a portion of the revenue with the publisher. We deliver well in excess of a billion such advertisements annually.

The Owned and Operated Network designs, builds and markets consumer websites and applications. This segment consists of our main online property marketed under the ALOT brand and a number of other websites targeted at specific demographics like EARNSPENDLIVE and sites designed specifically for generating leads in a specific market vertical like ASKTHIS for automotive. The majority of revenue generated by this segment is derived from advertisements that have been delivered on web pages that include both Inuvo content and advertisements. Our ALOT branded websites and applications have a broad appeal focusing on popular topics such as health, finance, careers, local search, travel, living, education and auto.

We have a number of highly differentiated and proprietary strengths that include; long standing advertising relationships with Yahoo and Google from whom we source advertising inventory which we distribute through our own online properties or through those of third party publishers; the ability to serve hundreds of millions of advertisements to any device or browser in milliseconds; the ability to both self-market and self-monetize our own publishing business; the ability to test advertising technology within our own publishing business; the ability to target advertisements based on website content, past behavior or to redirect users back to Inuvo content when the economics and alignment are optimized; the ability to expand to other geographies where appropriate; the ability to develop and publish content just-in-time to meet demand from advertisers; a low cost operation in central Arkansas with access to numerous universities, and a proprietary technology infrastructure developed by, and in some cases patented by Inuvo.

We plan to continue growing our website and mobile application business by expanding the ALOT brand and acquiring new websites where appropriate. We will continue to distribute SearchLinks broadly throughout the Internet by growing our network of publishers. Financially, we are focused on growth while maintaining a positive cash flow. We expect to continue to make strategic investments principally in these areas; marketing technology associated with direct to consumer acquisition; the SearchLinks platform, and advertising targeting analytics.

2016 Overview

After a year of very significant growth in 2015, 42% over the prior year, we experienced a soft second quarter in 2016. Changes in advertiser demand increased in the third quarter and we reported a 12% sequential growth rate in both our third and fourth quarters. During 2016, we:




expanded the technology in our native advertising solution, SearchLinks, by including a behavioral target decision matrix;
launched the performance marketing management platform for merchants, MYAP10;
expanded the ALOT.com brand introducing an auto site; and
renewed our Yahoo agreement.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. The more critical accounting estimates include estimates related to revenue recognition and accounts receivable allowances. We also have other key accounting policies, which involve the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that are significant to understanding our results, which are described in Note 2 to our audited financial statements for 2016 and 2015 appearing elsewhere in this report.

Results of Operations

Net Revenue
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 Change % Change
Partner Network$26,011,543
 $30,298,532
 $(4,286,989) (14.1%)
Owned and Operated Network45,518,559
 40,139,584
 5,378,975
 13.4%
Total net revenue$71,530,102
 $70,438,116
 $1,091,986
 1.6%

Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $71.5 million compared to $70.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Partner Network decreased 14% to $26.0 million and the Owned and Operated Network increased 13.4% to $45.5 million.

The Partner Network, which represents 36% of our total net revenue, delivers advertisements to our partners' websites and applications. Revenue in this segment is both a function of the total number of transactions processed through the ValidClick platform and the revenue we receive per transaction. At the end of the first quarter, we experienced fluctuations in demand from advertisers, which translated into a reduction in revenue received for ads we delivered. The result was both a lower number of transactions and a lower average RPC ("Revenue Per Click"). This fluctuation persisted into the third quarter 2016 and by the middle of the third quarter, both volume of transactions and RPCs improved. Despite this fluctuation, the Partner Network grew 58% in the fourth quarter over the same quarter last year; and grew sequentially 59% in the fourth quarter over the third quarter of the same year.
The Owned and Operated Network generates revenue through our consumer-facing ALOT branded websites and applications and through acquired websites. Our ALOT web properties include ALOT Health, ALOT Finance, ALOT Careers, ALOT Local, ALOT Travel, ALOT Living, ALOT Education, and ALOT Auto. These websites are content-rich and optimized for mobile and desktop devices, and are designed to capitalize on a growing consumer demand for content, delivered both on the desktop and on mobile devices. The increased revenue in this segment is from additional advertisements served to a growing user base of our owned and operated web properties. The revenue in this segment increased 13% in 2016 over 2015. The increased revenue is due to additional advertisements served to a growing user base of our owned and operated web properties. The increase in advertisements served and users engaged was due in part to increased marketing activity associated with our web properties where we are continuously expanding content. The lower revenue in the fourth quarter 2016 compared to the same quarter in the prior year was due in part to a reduction in advertiser demand we experienced in the ALOT sites. We intend to continue to expand our Owned and Operated Network by enhancing our current websites and mobile applications, launching additional mobile applications under the ALOT brand, expanding the content of the ALOT sites and acquiring additional web properties.

During the first quarter of 2016, the accrued sales allowance was adjusted as a result of not having an advertiser chargeback over the course of the previous year. The adjustment increased net revenue in the first quarter of 2016 by $250,000.

Cost of Revenue


 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 Change % Change
Partner Network$21,277,303
 $23,652,942
 $(2,375,639) (10.0%)
Owned and Operated Network87,492
 69,054
 18,438
 26.7%
Cost of revenue$21,364,795
 $23,721,996
 $(2,357,201) (9.9%)

Cost of revenue in the Partner Network is generated by payments to website and application publishers who host our advertisements. The decrease in cost of revenue in 2016 compared to 2015 is directly associated with the lower revenue reported in the Partner Network.

Owned and Operated Network cost of revenue consists of charges for web searches and content acquisition.

Operating Expenses
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 Change % Change
Marketing costs$39,195,653
 $34,324,646
 $4,871,007
 14.2%
Compensation6,830,338
 5,598,804
 1,231,534
 22.0%
Selling, general and administrative4,996,482
 4,645,697
 350,785
 7.6%
Operating expenses$51,022,473
 $44,569,147
 $6,453,326
 14.5%

Operating expenses increased in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period of the prior year. All operating expense categories reported higher expense.

Marketing costs include those expenses required to attract traffic to our owned and operated websites. Marketing costs increased in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 as a result of the growth within the owned and operated website and application business. We expect marketing costs to continue to increase proportionally as we expand the ALOT branded websites and mobile applications and acquired sites.

Compensation expense increased 22.0 % in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 to $6.8 million as compared to the same period of 2015 due primarily to an increase in the number of employees. Our total employment, both full-time and part-time was 72 at December 31, 2016 compared to 63 at December 31, 2015. We expect compensation expense to increase in 2017 as we hire additional developers and sales personnel to support the SearchLinks product.

Selling, general and administrative costs were $5.0 million, an increase of 7.6% over 2015. The primary reasons for the higher cost in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period last year are approximately $402,000 higher amortization and depreciation expense; $70,000 higher facilities cost; $53,000 higher travel and entertainment costs; partially offset by $172,000 lower professional fees. We expect selling, general and administrative costs to remain relatively flat in 2017.

Interest Expense, net
Interest expense, net was $99,965 and $141,311 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This is interest expense on the bank credit facility where average outstanding loan balances were significantly lower in 2016 compared to 2015.

Income tax benefit

In 2016, we recognized an income tax benefit of $29,260.

In 2015, we recognized a tax benefit of approximately $300,000 due to settling a disputed income tax claim with the State of New Jersey. The claim related to the 2007-2009 tax years and was settled for $100,000. As a result, the remaining long-term taxes payable liability was adjusted and resulted in a one-time $406,000 income tax benefit. The tax benefit in 2015 is partially offset by expense of approximately $106,000 for state income tax.



Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations

Certain of our subsidiaries previously operated in the European Union ("EU"). Though operations ceased in 2009, statutory requirements required a continued presence in the EU for varying terms until November 2015. Profits and losses generated from the remaining assets and liabilities are accounted for as discontinued operations.

In the third quarter of 2016, our petition with the UK (United Kingdom) Companies House to strike off and dissolve the remaining subsidiary in the EU was approved. As a result, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $155,287 and $33,969, respectively, due primarily to the adjustment of certain accrued liabilities originating in 2009 and earlier.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
On September 27, 2016, we renewed our Business Financing Agreement with Western Alliance Bank, the parent company of Bridge Bank, our original lender (see Note 6, "Notes Payable"). The renewal provided continued access to the revolving line of credit up to $10 million through September 2018. As of December 31, 2016, the balance of the revolving line of credit was zero and had approximately $6.0 million in availability.

In May 2015, we acquired websites from a publisher that had previously been a client on our ValidClick network. The purchase was structured as an earn-out payable in up to 500,000 shares of our common stock over a three-year period dependent upon achieving certain minimum levels of volume. The fair value of the transaction was determined to be $715,874. The transaction was recorded as an intangible asset on our balance sheet offset by a contingent liability of the same amount. On May 8, 2016, the seller achieved the specific performance target for the first year and as a result, we distributed 166,667 shares of our common stock. The accrued contingent liability and the related intangible asset, domain websites were adjusted by approximately $46 thousand to reflect the lower price paid as compared to the contingent liability recorded as a result of the change in the price of Inuvo stock from the date of acquisition to the first contingent release of shares.

During the first quarter of 2014, we filed an S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to replace the existing, expiring S-3 "shelf" registration statement, which permits us to offer and sell up to $15 million of our securities from time to time in one or more offerings. To date, we have not taken down any sales from this shelf registration statement. Though we believe the revolving line of credit and cash generated by operations will provide sufficient cash for operations over the next twelve months, we may still elect to sell securities to the public or to selected investors, or borrow under the current or any replacement line of credit or other debt instruments in order to fund the development of our technologies, make acquisitions, pursue new business opportunities or grow existing businesses.

During December 2016, 15,833 shares of our common stock were repurchased at an average price of $1.42 per shares under the Company’s current share repurchase program, which was announced on December 9, 2016 and authorizes the repurchase of the Company’s common stock totaling $500,000. Under the authorization, the Company may purchase shares from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.

Cash Flows - Operating

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,053,019 during 2016. We reported a net loss of $772,584, which included the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization of $2,209,738 and stock-based compensation of $1,264,266. The change in operating assets and liabilities was a net use of cash of $1,441,713 primarily due to a decrease in the accounts payable balance by $623,000 and an increase to the accounts receivable balance by $583,000. Our terms are such that we generally collect receivables prior to paying trade payables. The increase in the accounts receivable balance was due to greater revenue in 2016 over 2015. The decrease in the accounts payable balance in 2016 over 2015 was due to lower traffic acquisition costs in the fourth quarter of 2016.

During 2015, we generated cash from operating activities of $6,106,272 and a net income of $2,339,774, which included the non-cash expenses of depreciation and amortization of $1,807,350 and stock-based compensation expenses of $707,544, partially offset by a reduction of an accrued state income tax liability of $406,453. The change in operating assets and liabilities was a net provision of $1,470,560.

Cash Flows - Investing

Net cash used in investing activities was $1,116,371 and $1,525,888 for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Cash used in investing activities in both years has primarily consisted of capitalized internal development costs.


Cash Flows - Financing

Net cash used in financing activities was $247,048 during 2016.

During 2015, we used $4,037,705 to pay off the outstanding balance of the bank term loan and pay down the revolving credit facility to zero.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2016, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term "off-balance sheet arrangement" generally means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with us is a party, under which we have any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest or a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Our consolidated financial statements begin on page F-1 at the end of this annual report.

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.
ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls will prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the control. The design of any systems of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2016, the end of the period covered by this report, our management concluded their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. As of the evaluation date, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that we


maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC rules and regulations, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f).  Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.  In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 2013 Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based upon this assessment, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2016 our internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION.
Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Executive Officers

On February 15, 2017, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, adopted the 2017 Management Incentive Program. The program established a cash incentive pool which may be awarded to executive officers and our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer Richard K. Howe. Up to $700,000 of the cash incentive pool is based our achieving certain revenue and adjusted EBITDA levels as determined by our 2017 financial results and up to an additional $150,000 may be added to the pool at the discretion of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. The program provides that the total incentive pool which may be available for distribution will be divided between our executive officers (75% in the aggregate) and other employees (25% in the aggregate), subject to their continued employment with our company. The percentage of pool participation by each of our individual executive officers is fixed by the program and the amount of individual awards to our employees, other than our executive officers, will be determined by Mr. Howe.
PART III
 
ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Executive Officers and Directors

NameAgePositions
Richard K. Howe51Class I Director, Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Wallace D. Ruiz62Chief Financial Officer
John B. Pisaris, Esq.48General Counsel
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett III49Chief Operating Officer
Charles D. Morgan71Class III Director
Charles L. Pope62Class II Director
Joseph P. Durrett68Class I Director
Pat Terrell59Class III Director

Richard K. Howe. Mr. Howe has been a member of our Board of Directors since November 2008, and has served as Executive Chairman of the Board since March 2012 and as our Chief Executive Officer since December 2012. Previously, he served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2008 until March 2012. Prior to joining Inuvo, Mr. Howe served as Chief Marketing, Strategy and M&A Officer at billion dollar multi-channel marketing services leader the Acxiom Corporation (NasdaqGS: ACXM) where, since 2004, he lead the company's transition to online marketing services, the expansion into China and the development of the big data consulting services group. From 2001 to 2004, he served as general manager of Global Marketing Services (GMS) at Fair Isaac & Company (NYSE: FICO), a leading provider of analytics products and services where he drove the company's online initiatives. Between 1999 and 2001, Mr. Howe started, grew and sold private Internet search initiatives, ieWild. Mr. Howe has over his career led the acquisition, merger or divestiture of a dozen companies on 3 continents. Mr. Howe earned a bachelor’s degree with distinction in engineering from Concordia University, Canada, and he earned his master’s degree in engineering from McGill University, Canada.

Wallace D. Ruiz. Mr. Ruiz has served as our Chief Financial Officer since June 2010. From 2005 until April 2009, Mr. Ruiz was Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of SRI Surgical Express, Inc. (NasdaqGM: STRC), a Tampa, Florida provider of central processing and supply chain management services. From 1995 until 2004 he was Chief Financial Officer of Novadigm, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed developer and worldwide marketer of enterprise infrastructure and software services that was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company in 2004. Mr. Ruiz received a B.S. in Computer Science from St. John’s University and a M.B.A. in Accounting and Finance from Columbia University. Mr. Ruiz is a Certified Public Accountant.

John B. Pisaris. Mr. Pisaris has served as our General Counsel since March 2012 following our acquisition of Vertro. He served as general counsel of Vertro from October 2004 until March 2012. From February 2004 to September 2004, Mr. Pisaris served as vice president of legal of Vertro, and prior to that was a partner at Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, LLP, a law firm, from January 2002 to January 2004.
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett, III.Mr. Barrett joined Inuvo in February 2010 as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy and Business Development, and was promoted to Chief Operating Officer in February 2013. Prior to joining Inuvo, Mr. Barnett served as Acxiom Corporation's Director of Interactive Media Products overseeing the innovation and development of the Relevance-X product line. With over 25 years of data-driven direct marketing experience, he has been involved in several successful business start-ups in the direct and interactive marketing industries. Mr. Barnett earned a bachelor’s degrees in Marketing and Economics from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville.

Charles D. Morgan. Mr. Morgan has been a member of our Board of Directors since June 2009. He is the Executive Chairman of First Orion Corp., a private company that developed and markets PrivacyStar, an application that helps protect the mobile phone users' privacy. He is an equity owner of Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC, for which he also serves as Chairman of its Advisory Board and co-manager of investments. Mr. Morgan is also on the Board of Directors of Entrust, Inc., a private company that provides solutions to protect digital identities and information for security conscious enterprises and governments. He also serves as a member and is the past Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Hendrix College. Mr. Morgan is also Chairman of the Board of Querencia, a private real estate development and golf course in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. Mr. Morgan has extensive experience managing and investing in both private and public companies including Acxiom Corporation (NasdaqGS: ACXM), an information services company he helped grow from an early stage company to $1.4 billion in revenues during his tenure as Chief Executive Officer from 1975 to 2008. Mr. Morgan has served on the board and in various leadership roles with the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) throughout his career, serving in 2001 as chairman of the DMA board. Mr. Morgan was employed by IBM as a systems engineer for six years prior to joining Acxiom, and he holds a mechanical engineering degree from the University of Arkansas.
4

Charles L. Pope. Mr. Pope has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 2008. He has served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Palm Bank, a community bank in Tampa, Florida, since June 2009. From 2007 through 2009, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer of and a consultant to Aerosonic Corporation, a manufacturer of aircraft instruments and displays. From February 2005 through April 2007, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer for Reptron Manufacturing, a manufacturer of electronic services and engineering services. From April 2002 until February 2005, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer for SRI/Surgical, a provider to hospitals of reusable and disposable products used in surgical procedures. Previously, Mr. Pope served as Chief Financial Officer for UTEK Corporation, a business development company that acquires and funds the development of new university technologies. Since February 2010, Mr. Pope has been a member of the Board of Directors of Innovaro Inc. (OTCQB: INNI) and is Chairman of its Audit Committee and since June 2010, he has been a member of the Board of Directors of Oragenics, Inc. (OTCBB: OGEN) and is Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Pope was with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and left as a partner. Mr. Pope holds a B.S. in economics and accounting from Auburn University, and he is a Certified Public Accountant in Florida.

Joseph P. Durrett. Mr. Durrett has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 2012 following the closing of our acquisition of Vertro. From August 2006 until March 2012 he was a director of Vertro. Mr. Durrett was chairman of PromoWorks, a marketing corporation, from November 2008 until December 2013, and president of Jocabos Brands, a marketing corporation, since January 2008. Mr. Durrett has been a partner of PrimeGenesis, a management consulting organization, since April 2008. Mr. Durrett was a consultant to TA Associates Private Equity Firm from March 2008 to December 2008 and was senior advisor and investor for Madden Communications, a marketing organization, from August 2004 to August 2006. Prior to that, Mr. Durrett was presiding rights agent for Information Resources, Inc. Contingent Value Rights Trust, an independent trust, from December 2003 to August 2006, and chairman, president, and chief executive officer of Information Resources, Inc., a technology corporation, from May 1999 to January 2004.
Pat Terrell. Mr. Terrell has been a member of our Board of Directors since January 2013. Mr. Terrell is currently the managing member of both Terrell Group Management and PatRick Investments, LLC, private equity and real estate investment companies. He also serves on the boards of RS Medical, Routeware Inc., Skagit Garden and Aequitas Capital. Mr. Terrell served as founder and CEO of Leading Technology, a $300 million per year manufacturer of personal computers. Additionally, he founded Byte Shops Northwest, which serviced personal computers, and grew to $50 million in annual revenues.

There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers and directors.

Director Qualification

The following is a discussion for each director of the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to recommend to the Board, and for the Board to conclude that the individual should be serving as a director of Inuvo.

Class I Directors

Richard K. Howe – Mr. Howe’s track record as a successful high-technology operating and marketing executive in data, analytics, and marketing services as a result of building and/or running over a dozen businesses in five countries were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee viewed favorably his position at companies that include Inuvo as president and CEO; Acxiom Corporation as chief marketing, business strategy and M&A officer, Fair Isaac & Company where he served as general manager, and ieWild, Inc. as co-founder and chairman and CEO; his service as a board member for the non-profit organization Business for Diplomatic Action; and his academic achievements at Concordia University and McGill University in making their recommendation.

Joseph P. Durrett – Mr. Durrett's track record as a seasoned operating and marketing executive were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee viewed favorably Mr. Durrett's service as a director to Vertro, his work as chairman of PromoWorks, a marketing corporation, his involvement as president of Jocabos Brands, a marketing corporation, his involvement with PrimeGenesis, a management consulting organization, his service as a consultant to TA Associates Private Equity Firm, and his position as senior advisor and investor for Madden Communications, a marketing organization in making their recommendation.

Class II Directors

Charles L. Pope – Mr. Pope’s track record as a successful Tampa-based Chief Financial Officer and board member with decades of experience in public company accounting and finance were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee viewed favorably his positions as CFO at companies that include Aerosonic Corporation, Reptron Manufacturing and UTEK Corporation; his experience at PricewaterhouseCoopers where he served as partner during his 20 years with the firm; his certification as a Certified Public Accountant; and his academic achievements from Auburn University in making their recommendation.
5

Class III Directors

Charles D. Morgan – Mr. Morgan’s successful track record as a high-technology executive in data, analytics, outsourcing and marketing services with a network of relationships worldwide as a result of building a billion dollar annual revenue enterprise as chairman and chief executive officer were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee viewed favorably his experience at companies such as Acxiom Corporation as Chairman and CEO and IBM as a systems engineer; his role as an equity owner of Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC and a significant investor in its funds; his service as Chairman of the Advisory Board and co-manager of investments for Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC; his leadership on the board and in various leadership roles with the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) including his service as chairman of the DMA in 2001; his service as a member and past chairman of the board of trustees of Hendrix College; and his academic achievements at the University of Arkansas in making their recommendation.

Pat Terrell – Mr. Terrell’s track record as a successful operating executive and investor were factors considered by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board. Specifically, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Board viewed favorably Mr. Terrell’s services as founder and CEO of Leading Technology, a manufacturer of personal computers, his founding of Byte Shops Northwest, and his services as managing member of Terrell Group Management and PatRick Investments, LLC in making their recommendation.

In addition to the each of the individual skills and background described above, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and our Board also concluded that each of these individuals will continue to provide knowledgeable advice to our other directors and to senior management on numerous issues facing our company and on the development and execution of our strategy.

Compensation of Directors

Each independent member of our Board of Directors received the following fees:
$2,000 fee for substantive Board meetings;
$1,000 fee for substantive committee meetings;
$2,000 for each day spent on general company business, not to exceed five (5) days; and
$10,000 annual retainer, paid quarterly.
Additionally, during 2013 each of our independent members of our Board of Directors received a restricted stock unit for 20,000 shares of our common stockwhich vested on December 31, 2013.

As he was our Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer during 2013, Mr. Howe did not receive any compensation for his services as a member of our Board of Directors in 2013.  The following table provides information concerning the compensation paid to our independent directors for their services as members of our Board of Directors for 2013. The information in the following table excludes any reimbursement of out-of-pocket travel and lodging expenses which we may have paid.
  Director Compensation 
Name 
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash ($)
  
Stock
awards
($)
  
Option
awards
($)1
  
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
($)
  
Nonqualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)
  
All other
compensation
($)
  
Total
($)
 
Charles D. Morgan  26,000   35,560   -   -   -   -   61,560 
Charles L. Pope  34,000   35,560   -   -   -   -   69,560 
Joseph P. Durrett  34,000   15,400   -   -   -   -   49,400 
Pat Terrell  22,000   15,400   -   -   -   -   37,400 

1The amounts included in the “Option Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to directors during 2013, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in the valuations of the option awards are included in Note 10 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 appearingrequired by this Item will be contained in our 2013 10-K.

6

Summary of Corporate Governance Framework

We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of honest and ethical conduct in running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders interests and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. To further this commitment, we have adopted our Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics, which applies to all our directors, officers and employees. To assist in its governance, our Board has formed two standing committees composed entirely of independent directors, Audit and Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation, and a third standing committee, Strategy and Risk, comprised of a majority of independent directors. A discussion of each committee’s function is set forth below. Additionally, we have adopted and published to all employees our Whistleblower Notice establishing procedures by which any employee may bring to the attention of our Audit Committee any disclosure regarding accounting, internal control or other auditing issues affecting our company or any improper activities of any officer or employee. Disclosure may be made anonymously.

            Our by-laws, the charters of each Board committee, the independent status of a majority of our Board of Directors, our Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics and our Whistleblower Notice provide the framework for our corporate governance. Copies of our by-laws, committee charters, Code of Conduct and Business Code of Ethics and Whistleblower Notice may be found on our website at www.inuvo.com. Copies of these materials also are available without charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary.
Board of Directors
The Board of Directors oversees our business affairs and monitors the performance of management. In accordance with our corporate governance principles, the Board of Directors does not involve itself in day-to-day operations. The directors keep themselves informed through discussions with the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer and by reading the reports and other materials that we send them and by participating in Board of Directors and committee meetings. Commencing with our 2008 annual meeting, our directors were divided into three classes and designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Directors may be assigned to each class in accordance with a resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors. Directors are elected for a full term of three years. Our directors hold office until their successors have been elected and duly qualified unless the director resigns or by reason of death or other cause is unable to serve in the capacity of director. If any director resigns, dies or is otherwise unable to serve out his or her term, or if the Board increases the number of directors, the Board may fill any vacancy by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum exists. A director elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the unexpired term of his or her predecessor. Vacancies occurring by reason of the removal of directors without cause may only be filled by vote of the stockholders.
Board Leadership Structure and Board’s Role in Risk Oversight
Prior to the departure of our former Chief Executive Officer in December 2012 the offices of Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer were separated. Commencing in December 2012 Mr. Richard K. Howe, our then Executive Chairman, resumed the position of Chief Executive Officer which he had previously held from November 2008 until March 2012. In February 2013, Mr. Charles D. Morgan, an independent director, assumed the role of Lead Independent Director. Our Board believes our current structure provides independence and oversight and facilitates the communication between senior management and the full Board of Directors regarding risk oversight, which the Board believes strengthens its risk oversight activities. Moreover, the addition of a Lead Independent Director will allow the Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to better focus on his responsibilities of running the company, enhancing stockholder value and expanding and strengthening our business while allowing the Lead Independent Director to lead the Board in its fundamental role of providing independent oversight of management.
Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the risks we face, while the Board, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. In its risk oversight role, the Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. To do this, the Strategy and Risk Committee meets regularly with management to review Inuvo's risks. Additionally, the Chairman of the Audit Committee and other members of our Board of Directors meet regularly with management to discuss strategy and risks we face. Our Chief Financial Officer attends many of the Board meetings and is available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board on risk management and any other matters. The independent members of the Board work together to provide strong, independent oversight of our management and affairs through its standing committees and, when necessary, special meetings of independent directors.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that a majority of our current directors have no relationship which, in the opinion of the Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and is an “independent director” as defined in the NYSE MKT Company Guide. In determining the independence of our directors, the Board of Directors has adopted independence standards specified by applicable laws and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE MKT. In making the determination of the independence of our directors, the Board of Directors considered all known transactions in which Inuvo and any director had any interest, including any discussed under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below.
7

Our independent directors may meet at any time in their sole discretion without any other directors or representatives of management present. Each independent director has access to the members of our management team or other employees as well as full access to our books and records. We have no policy limiting, and exert no control over, meetings of our independent directors.
Board Committees

The Board of Directors has standing Audit, Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation, and Strategy and Risk committees. Each committee has a written charter. The charters are available on our website at www.inuvo.com. Except as set forth below, all committee members are independent directors. Information concerning the current membership and function of each committee is as follows:
DirectorAudit Committee MemberNominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee MemberStrategy and Risk Committee Member
Charles D. Morganüü
Charles L. Pope
ü1
ü
Joseph P. Durrettü
ü1
Pat Terrellü
Richard K. Howe 2
ü
1           Denotes Chairperson.
2           Mr. Howe is not an independent director and is not a member of any committee of the Board.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to:

the integrity of our financial statements;
our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and
the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accountants.
The Audit Committee is composed of two directors, both of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent as defined by the NYSE MKT Company Guide. The Board has determined that Mr. Pope, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.
Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee is responsible for:
overseeing our compensation programs and practices, including our executive compensation plans and incentive compensation plans,
recommending the slate of director nominees for election to our Board of Directors;
identifying and recommending candidates to fill vacancies occurring between annual stockholder meetings;
reviewing the composition of Board committees; and
monitoring compliance with, reviews, and recommends changes to our various corporate governance policies and guidelines.
The Chief Executive Officer provides input to the committee with respect to the individual performance and compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. Although the committee’s charter authorizes the committee to retain an independent consultant, no third party compensation consultant was engaged for 2013. The committee also prepares and supervises the Board’s annual review of director independence and the Board’s annual self-evaluation.
A majority of the persons serving on our Board of Directors must be independent. Thus, the committee has considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and us or our affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below. The committee also reviewed transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management or their affiliates. As a result of this review, the committee affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Pope, Morgan, Terrell and Durrett are independent as defined by the NYSE MKT Company Guide.
8

The committee considers all qualified candidates for our Board of Directors identified by members of the committee, by other members of the Board of Directors, by senior management and by our stockholders. The committee reviews each candidate including each candidate’s independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of factors, including the person’s experience or background in management, finance, regulatory matters and corporate governance. Further, when identifying nominees to serve as director, while we do not have a policy regarding the consideration of diversity in selecting directors, the committee seeks to create a Board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. In addition, prior to nominating an existing director for re-election to the Board of Directors, the committee will consider and review an existing director’s Board and committee attendance and performance, length of Board service, experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to the Board, equity ownership in Inuvo and independence.
            The committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by stockholders, members of the Board of Directors and members of senior management. Based on its assessment of each candidate, the committee recommends candidates to the Board. However, there is no assurance that there will be any vacancy on the Board at the time of any submission or that the committee will recommend any candidate for the Board.
During 2013 the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee was composed of three directors, all of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent as defined by the NYSE MKT Company Guide.
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”)
Dodd-Frank requires public companies to provide stockholders with an advisory vote on compensation of the most highly compensated executives, which are sometimes referred to as “say on pay” as well as an advisory vote on how often the company will present say on pay votes to its stockholders. At our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders approved a non-binding proposal that the frequency of an advisory vote on our executive compensation would be held every three years together with a non-binding resolution approving our executive compensation as described in that proxy statement. As such, the proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting2017 Annual Meeting of stockholders will contain a non-binding sayShareholders to be filed on pay proposal foror prior to April 30, 2017 (the “Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by this reference or is included in Part I under “Executive Officers of the approval of our then current executive compensation structure.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has also approved new NYSE listing standards relating to compensation committees of listed companies, including companies on the NYSE MKT. The listing requirements were added pursuant to Dodd-Frank and address:
enhanced independence requirement for compensation committee members,
compensation committee authority relating to compensation consultants, counsel and other advisers, and
the responsibility of the compensation committee to consider potential conflicts of interests when choosing consultants, counsel and other advisers.
Company.”

Listed companies have until the earlier of the first annual meeting after January 15, 2014, or October 31, 2014 to comply with the new compensation committee independence. Listed companies, however, are required to comply with other new standards, including those relating to the authority of the compensation committee, beginning on July 1, 2013. A smaller reporting company such as Inuvo is not subject to the requirements of these new compensation committee rules, except that a smaller reporting company must have, and certify that it has and will continue to have, a compensation committee of at least two members, each of whom must be an independent director as defined under the current NYSE MKT independence rules. Our Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee meets this requirements. In addition, while a smaller reporting company must certify that it has adopted a formal written compensation committee charter or board resolution that specifies certain of the content discussed above, it will not need to incorporate into its charter or board resolutions provisions regarding authority to retain and fund compensation consultants, counsel, and advisers and responsibility to consider the independence of compensation consultants, counsel, and advisers. Although we are exempted from those portions of this rule, we expect to adopt an amendment to the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee charter to company with the new requirements, including:
reflecting the rights and responsibilities of the compensation committee under the Dodd-Frank compensation committee rules,
granting the committee the authority to retain consultants, counsel and advisers, and
reflecting the committee’s responsibility to consider conflicts of interest before selecting consultants, counsel or advisers.
Strategy and Risk Committee. The Strategy and Risk Committee supports the Board of Directors in the oversight of Inuvo's growth strategies, technology investments, risk assessments, and in the review and approval of corporate strategy. The Strategy and Risk Committee has three members, two of whom are independent as defined by the NYSE MKT Company Guide.
9

Among other things, the Strategy and Risk Committee is responsible for:
providing oversight of Inuvo’s strategic planning process and of our implementation of our strategic decisions, with emphasis on both technology investment and business partnering required to meet product development and marketing expectations;
meeting with management periodically to review and evaluate our progress in implementing the strategic plan and suggest appropriate modifications to reflect changes in market or business conditions;
reporting to the Board on findings about technology and development plans, in order to leverage and grow the business in existing markets, and defend the company’s technology leadership and market position;
working with Inuvo’s management to identify and evaluate major risk exposures, including operational, legal, regulatory, business, strategic, credit, liquidity, and reputational risks; and
overseeing management’s monitoring and evaluation of identified risks and mitigation of identified risks.
During 2013 the Strategy and Risk Committee was composed of three directors, two of whom have been determined by the Board of Directors to be independent as defined by the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

Stockholder nominations

Stockholders who would like to propose a candidate may do so by submitting the candidate’s name, resume and biographical information to the attention of our Corporate Secretary. All proposals for nomination received by the Corporate Secretary will be presented to the committee for appropriate consideration. It is the policy of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to consider director candidates recommended by stockholders who appear to be qualified to serve on our Board of Directors. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may choose not to consider an unsolicited recommendation if no vacancy exists on the Board of Directors and the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee does not perceive a need to increase the size of the Board of Directors. In order to avoid the unnecessary use of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee’s resources, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee will consider only those director candidates recommended in accordance with the procedures set forth below. To submit a recommendation of a director candidate to the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee, a stockholder should submit the following information in writing, addressed to the Corporate Secretary of Inuvo at our main office:
the name and address of the person recommended as a director candidate;
all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
the written consent of the person being recommended as a director candidate to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected;
as to the person making the recommendation, the name and address, as they appear on our books, of such person, and number of shares of our common stock owned by such person; provided, however, that if the person is not a registered holder of our common stock, the person should submit his or her name and address along with a current written statement from the record holder of the shares that reflects the recommending person’s beneficial ownership of our common stock; and
a statement disclosing whether the person making the recommendation is acting with or on behalf of any other person and, if applicable, the identity of such person.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the year ended December 31, 2013 and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as any written representation from a reporting person that no Form 5 is required, we are not aware that any officer, director or 10% or greater stockholder failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the aforementioned Forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the year ended December 31, 2013 other than each of Messrs. Howe, Ruiz, Pisaris and Barnett each failed to timely file one Form 4 reporting one transaction. 

ITEM 11.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Compensation Philosophy
The fundamental objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers, motivate these executive officers to materially contribute to our long-term business success, and align the interests of our executive officers and stockholders by rewarding our executives for individual and corporate performance based on targets established by the Compensation Committee which is now part of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.
10

We believe that achievement of these compensation program objectives enhances long-term stockholder value. When designing compensation packages to reflect these objectives, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has adopted the following four principles as a guide:

Alignment with stockholder interests: Compensation should be tied, in part, to our stock performance through the granting of equity awards to align the interests of executive officers with those of our stockholders,

Recognition for business performance: Compensation should correlate in large part with our overall financial performance,

Accountability for individual performance: Compensation should partially depend on the individual executive’s performance, in order to motivate and acknowledge the key contributors to our success, and

Competition: Compensation should generally reflect the competitive marketplace and be consistent with that of other well-managed companies in our peer group. In implementing this compensation philosophy, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee takes into account the compensation amounts from the previous years for each of the named executive officers, and internal compensation equity between the named executive officers and other employees.

2013 Compensation Determination Process
In 2013, the compensation program for our executive officers consisted of the following components:
base salary;
2005 Plan and 2010 Plan awards; and
other fringe benefits and perquisites.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation package consists of elements of compensation that are typically used to incentivize and reward executive management at other companies of our size, in our geographic area or in our industry. Each of these components is designed to meet the program's objectives of providing a combination of fixed and variable, performance-based compensation linked to individual and corporate performance. In the course of setting the initial compensation level for new hires or adjusting the compensation of existing employees, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee considered the advice and input of our management. Our Chief Executive Officer typically makes recommendations to the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee for any proposed changes in salary, as well as performance-based awards and stock option grants, for the other named executive officers. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee decides any salary change, as well as performance-based awards and stock option grants, for the Chief Executive Officer
Base Salary
Base salary is an important component of executive compensation because it provides executives with an assured-level of income, assists us in attracting executives and recognizes different levels of responsibility and authority among executives. The determination of base salaries is based upon the executive’s qualifications and experience, scope of responsibility and potential to achieve the goals and objectives established for the executive. Additionally, contractual provisions in executive employment agreements, past performance, internal pay equity and comparison to competitive salary practices are also considered.
In general, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee considers two types of potential base salary increases including “merit increases” based upon the executives’ individual performance and/or “market adjustments” based upon the peer group salary range for similar executives.
Plan Awards
The objective of our long-term incentive program is to provide a long-term retention incentive for the named executive officers and others and to align their interests directly with those of our stockholders by way of stock ownership. Under both our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and our 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”), the Board of Directors or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine whether equity awards will be granted to named executive officers and if so, the number of shares subject to each award. Both plans allow the Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to grant options and restricted stock and other stock-based awards with respect to up to shares of our common stock, valued in whole or in part by reference to the fair market value of the stock. In most instances, these long-term grants vest over a multi-year basis.
The Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee determines the recipients of long-term incentive awards based upon such factors as performance, the length of continuous employment, managerial level, any prior awards, and recruiting and retention demands, expectations and needs. All our employees are eligible for awards. The Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee grants such awards by formal action, which awards are not final until a stock option agreement is delivered by us and executed by both the company and the employee. There is no set schedule for the Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee to consider and grant awards. The Board and the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee have the discretion to make grants whenever it deems it appropriate in our best interests. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has discretion to grant equity awards at any time.
11

We do not have any program, plan or practice in place to time option or other award grants with the release of material, non-public information and does not release such information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. The exercise price of stock subject to options awarded under the our plans is the fair market value of the stock on the date the grant is approved by the Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. Under the terms of each plan, the fair market value of the stock is the closing sales price of the stock on the date the grant is approved by the Board or the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee as reported by the NYSE MKT.
Other Compensation and Benefits
We have historically provided perquisites and other types of non-cash benefits on a very limited basis in an effort to avoid an entitlement mentality, reinforce a pay-for-performance orientation and minimize expense. Such benefits, when provided, can include additional health care benefits and additional life insurance.
Retirement and Other Post-Termination Benefits
Other than our 401(k) plan, employment agreements with our named executive officers and certain other employment agreements which provide for severance for termination without cause, we have not entered into any employment agreements that provide for a continuation of post-employment benefits. Our benefits plans are generally the same for all employees, and so as of the date of this proxy statement, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee does not believe that any such plans in their present forms would continue post-employment, except as required by law (including with respect to COBRA), or otherwise set forth in this proxy statement. We do not currently maintain any other retirement or post-termination benefits plans.
Change in Control Severance Policy
We do not currently maintain any change in control severance plans or severance policies, except as provided in the executive employment agreements and the 2005 Plan, both of which are discussed later in this section. Therefore, none of our named executive officers will receive any cash severance payments in the event we undergo a change in control, unless their employment agreement otherwise provides.
Insurance
All full-time employees, including the named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our standard medical, dental, long-term and short-term disability and life insurance plans. The terms of such benefits for the named executive officers are generally the same as those for all other company employees, with the exception of the level of life insurance coverage. We pay approximately 95% of the annual health insurance premium with employees paying the balance through payroll deductions. Until the merger with Vertro on March 2, 2012, the company paid the entire premium for a basic long term care insurance plan for division manager and above. In addition, division directors and above received company-paid basic term life insurance and accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance in an amount of $500,000. Our executive officers receive up to $1,000,000 insurance amount of basic life insurance and AD&D insurance paid by us. All other full-time employees can elect basic life insurance and AD&D insurance coverage equal to their annual salary, up to $150,000, paid by us. We paid a portion of the elected short-term and long-term disability insurance opted by our employees. Other than the portion of the annual health insurance premium and all of the executive life insurance premiums, benefits paid by the company ceased on March 1, 2012.
401(k)
We sponsor a 401(k) plan, which is a qualified defined contribution retirement plan. Participants are provided the opportunity to make salary reduction contributions to the plan on a pre-tax basis. We have the ability to make discretionary matching contributions and discretionary profit sharing contributions to such plan. Our practice since 2010 was to not to make matching contribution. Since the merger with Vertro on March 1, 2012, we implemented the Vertro practice of matching 25% of the participant’s contributions, up to an aggregate of 5% of each participant’s earnings. Previously, the company match, if any vested over a three year period, subject to continued employment. Presently, the company match is fully vested  when made.
12

Other Benefits
We seek to maintain an open and inclusive culture in our facilities and operations among executives and other company employees. Thus, we do not provide executives with separate dining or other facilities, nor do we have programs for providing personal-benefit perquisites to executives, such as defraying the cost of personal entertainment or family travel. Our basic health care and other insurance programs are generally the same for all eligible employees, including the named executive officers. During  2012 Mr. Howe received reimbursement for certain relocation expenses and during 2012 and 2013 Mr. Ruiz received reimbursement for certain relocation expenses.

Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in each of the last two completed fiscal years for:
all individuals serving as our principal executive officer or acting in a similar capacity during the year ended December 31, 2013,
our two most highly compensated named executive officers at December 31, 2012 whose annual compensation exceeded $100,000, and
up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been made in this table but for the fact that the individual was not serving as a named executive officer of our company at December 31, 2013.
The value attributable to any option awards is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in the valuations of the option awards are included in Note 10 of the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 appearing in our 2013 10-K.
Name and principal position Year 
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)
  
Option
Awards
($)
  Nonequity incentive plan compen-sation ($)  Non-qualified deferred compen-sation earnings ($)  
All
other compen-sation
($)
  
Total
($)
 
                           
Richard K. Howe, 2013 370,889  0  432,300  0  0  0  0  803,189 
Chairman and Chief 2012  395,000   75,000   0   0   0    0  10,661   480,661 
Executive Officer1                                  
                                   
Wallace D. Ruiz, 2013  269,271   0   93,750   0   0   0   11,388   374,409 
Chief Financial Officer 2
 2012  265,000   50,000   0   0   0   0   25,140   340,140 
                                   
John B. Pisaris 2013  306,271   0   15,900   0   0   0   0   322,171 
General Counsel 2012  335,000   0   0   0   0   0   0   335,000 

1All other compensation for Mr. Howe in 2012 included $10,661 for relocation expenses.

2All other compensation for Mr. Ruiz included $25,140 in 2012 and $11,388 in 2013 in relocation expenses.
Executive Employment Agreements

On March 1, 2012, we entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Howe, Ruiz, and Pisaris. The employment agreements entered into by Messrs. Howe, Ruiz, and Pisaris, each referred to as an executive, have an initial term of one year, after which each executive’s employment agreement automatically renews for additional one-year periods on the same terms and conditions, unless either party to the agreement exercises the respective termination rights available to such party in the agreement. The employment agreements provide for a minimum annual base salary of $395,000 for Mr. Howe, $335,000 for Mr. Pisaris, and $275,000 for Mr. Ruiz. The employment agreements require our company to compensate the executives and provide them with certain benefits if their employment is terminated. The compensation and benefits the executives are entitled to receive upon termination of employment vary depending on whether their employment is terminated:
by us for cause (as defined in the employment agreements);
by us without cause, or by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment agreements);
due to death or disability; or
by the executive without good reason.
13

In the event of a termination by our company without cause or a termination by the executive for good reason, the executive would be entitled to receive the following:
his earned but unpaid basic salary through the termination date, plus a portion of the executive’s bonus based upon the bonus he would have earned in the year in which his employment was terminated, pro-rated for the amount of time employed by us during such year and paid on the original date such bonus would have been payable;
an amount payable over the 12-month period following termination equal to one times the sum of his basic salary at the time of termination, plus a termination bonus equal to the bonus paid to the executive during the four fiscal quarters prior to the date of termination (except that if a target bonus has been established for Mr. Howe, each such person’s termination bonus is equal to his target bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, increased or decreased pursuant to actual performance versus targeted performance in the then current plan measured as of the end of the calendar month preceding the termination date), or in the event of a change of control (as defined below), the greater of the relevant calculation above or the bonus paid to the executive during the four fiscal quarters prior to the change of control;
any other amounts or benefits owing to the executive under our then-applicable employee benefit, long-term incentive, or equity plans and programs, within the terms of such plans, payable over the 12-month period following termination; and
benefits (including health, life, and disability) as if the executive was still an employee during the 12-month period following termination.
Finally, in the event of a termination without cause by our company, with good reason by the executive, or following a change of control (as defined in the employment agreements), any equity award held by the executive will immediately and fully vest and become exercisable throughout the full term of such award as if the executive were still employed by us. In the event of a termination by us with cause, Messrs. Pisaris, Ruiz and Howe would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination.
In the event of a termination by us of Messrs. Pisaris or Ruiz upon the death or permanent disability of such executive, the executive would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, the earned but unpaid portion of any vested incentive compensation under and consistent with plans adopted by us prior to the date of termination, and over the 12 months following the date of termination an amount equal to 20% base salary at the time of termination for each year of employment with us or Vertro, capped at 100% of the base salary.
In the event of a termination by us of Mr. Howe upon the death or permanent disability of such executive, the executive would be entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, any other amounts or benefits owing to the executive under any of our then-applicable employee benefit, long-term incentive or equity plans and programs, and over the 12 months following the date of termination an amount equal to 20% base salary at the time of termination for each year of employment with us, capped at 100% of the base salary.
In the event of a termination by Messrs. Pisaris or Ruiz without good reason, each such executive is entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of such executive’s base salary through the date of termination, and the earned but unpaid portion of any vested incentive compensation under and consistent with our plans adopted by us prior to the date of termination. In the event of a termination by Mr. Howe without good reason, each such executive is entitled to receive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination date and any other amounts and benefits owing to the executive under our then applicable employee benefit, long term incentive or equity plans and programs.

The executive may terminate employment for any reason (other than good reason) upon giving 30 days’ advance written notice to us. As to a terminationinformation required by Messrs. Pisaris or Ruiz for any reason other than a good reason, wethis item will pay the executive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination datebe contained in our Proxy Statement and any earned but unpaid vested incentive compensation under and consistent with plans adoptedis incorporated herein by us prior to the date of termination. As to a termination by Mr. Howe for any reason other than a good reason, we will pay the executive the earned but unpaid portion of his base salary through the termination date and any other amounts and benefits owing to the executive under our then applicable employee benefit, long term incentive or equity plans and programs.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of December 31, 2013.this reference.
 
14

OPTION AWARDS  STOCK AWARDS 
Name 
Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#) exercisable
  
Number of securities underlying unexercised options
(#) unexercisable
  
Equity incentive plan awards: Number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options
(#)
  
Option exercise price
($)
  Option expiration date  Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)  Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)  Equity incentive plan awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#)  Equity incentive plan awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested (#) 
Richard K. Howe 1
  110,000   10,000   -   2.93  3/14/2021   320,000   432,300   -   - 
                                     
Wallace D. Ruiz 2
  39,416   3,584   -   2.93   3/14/2021   75,000   93,750   -   - 
                                     
John B. Pisaris  -   -   -   -   -   15,000   15,900   -   - 
1 Mr. Howe voluntarily surrendered an aggregate of 521,031 options with an exercise price of $2.50 per share in Q1 2013.
2 Mr. Ruiz voluntarily surrendered an aggregate of 95,339 options with exercise prices ranging from $1.70 to $2.50 per share in Q1 2013.
Our Equity Compensation Plans

Our equity compensation plans include our 2005 Plan and our 2010 Plan, both of which have been approved by our stockholders. The purpose of each of these plans is to advance the interests of our company by providing an incentive to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and competent persons who are important to us and upon whose efforts and judgment the success of our company is largely dependent. Grants to be made under either of the plans may be made to our employees, our executive officers and members of our Board of Directors.

The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has full authority to administer both of the plans, including determining recipients of awards and the amount and type of awards. The recipient of any grant under either the 2005 Plan or the 2010 Plan, and the amount and terms of a specific grant, are determined by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee determines the terms of each option at the time of the grant. Generally, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has discretion to provide for an exercise term of up to 10 years or, with respect to an incentive stock option, five years in the case of a participant who on the date of grant owns more than 10% of our outstanding voting stock. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may specify at or after the date of grant the time or times at which, and in what proportions, an option becomes vested and exercisable. Generally, under either plan options may be exercised commencing on or after the date of grant and ending on the expiration or termination of the option. Vesting may be based on the continued service of the participant for specified time periods or on the company attaining specified performance goals or both.

Awards of stock options granted under either the 2005 Plan or the 2010 Plan will automatically qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) pursuant to their expected terms. Under Section 162(m), the terms of the award must state an objective formula or standard, the method of computing the amount of compensation payable under the award, and must preclude discretion to increase the amount of compensation payable under the award although the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee has the discretion to decrease the amount of compensation payable.

The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee also has the discretionary authority to interpret either plan, to amend, waive or extend any provision or unit of any award, to approve the forms of agreement for use under the plan and to otherwise supervise the administration of the plan. Information on each of these plans is set forth below.

2005 Plan

The Board has reserved a maximum of 1,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 2005 Plan. In the event of a recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, combination, exchange, dividend or other distributions payable in capital stock, or other change in our corporate structure, we will adjust the number, kind and, with respect to options, the exercise price of, shares available for grant. A participant may receive multiple awards under the 2005 Plan. Shares delivered under the 2005 Plan will be authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. To the extent that any award payable in shares is forfeited or an award otherwise terminates or expires without the issuance of shares or vesting of restricted stock units, the shares covered thereby may again be made subject to awards under the 2005 Plan unless the participant who had been awarded those shares had already received dividends or other benefits of ownership with respect to those shares, but will be counted against that calendar year’s limit with respect to a given participant.
15

The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may grant the following types of awards under the 2005 Plan.

Stock Options. Options to purchase shares of our common stock may be granted alone or in connection with other awards under the 2005 Plan. Options granted under the 2005 Plan may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Code. The exercise price of any stock option granted under the 2005 Plan may not be less than the fair market value of the shares of common stock at the date of grant. Further, in the event that an employee would otherwise be ineligible to receive an incentive stock option by reason of Code Sections 422(b)(6) or 424(d), the price of the shares intended to be incentive stock options may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the shares of common stock at the date of grant. We will only grant incentive stock options under either plan to our employees including employees of any of our indirect or direct subsidiaries.
Restricted Stock. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may also grant awards of common stock subject to restrictions. Awards of common stock granted under the 2005 Plan may be granted alone or in connection with other awards under the 2005 Plan. Restricted stock represents shares of common stock that are issued subject to restrictions on transfer and vesting requirements. Vesting requirements may be based on the continued service of the participant for specified time periods or on the company or the person, or both, attaining specified performance goals. Dividends or other distributions may be paid on shares of restricted stock. Recipients of restricted stock may have the same rights as our stockholders, including all voting and dividend rights.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may grant other awards valued by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of our common stock or on the fair market value thereof and subject to any terms and conditions determined by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. The awards may be granted alone or in tandem with other awards under the 2005 Plan.
If the participant is not vested as to his or her entire option at the time the participant terminates employment or is terminated as an employee, the unvested portion of the option will revert to the plan. If, after termination, the participant does not exercise his or her option within the time specified in the relevant agreement governing the option, the option will terminate and the shares will revert to the particular plan under which the grant was made.
Awards under the 2005 Plan are generally subject to special provisions upon the occurrence of a “change in control” transaction, as defined in the 2005 Plan. Under the 2005 Plan, in the event a participant is terminated “without cause” (as that term is defined in the agreement governing the award to the participant) during the one year period following a “change in control,” then:
any and all options granted thereunder which would vest with the passage of time were the participant to continue as an employee for the applicable period and the “current year’s percentage” (as defined below) of any options which are tied to performance standards that could possibly be achieved during the calendar year in which the participant’s employment has been terminated, will be deemed to vest in full and become immediately exercisable, and will remain exercisable throughout their entire term;
any restrictions imposed on restricted shares of common stock will lapse with respect to restricted shares which would vest with the passage of time were the participant to continue as an employee for the applicable period and the “current year’s percentage” of any restricted shares which are tied to performance standards that could possibly be achieved during the calendar year in which the participant’s employment has been terminated will be deemed earned; and

the maximum payout opportunities attainable under all other stock-based awards which would vest with the passage of time were the participant to continue as an employee for the applicable period will be deemed to be vested in full and the “current year’s percentage” will be deemed to have been fully earned for the calendar year in which the participant’s employment has been terminated.
Any of the awards vesting or exercised by virtue of a change in control will be paid in cash or in the sole discretion of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee in shares to the participant within 30 days following the effective date of the termination of employment. Any shares issued in respect of these awards shall be valued at the fair market value as of the effective date of the termination of employment without cause.
The “current year’s percentage” means that percentage of the performance-based award that would have been satisfied for the calendar year in question based upon the product of (i) the percentage of calendar quarters completed for the year in which the employee is terminated without cause, multiplied by (ii) the performance-based award that the employee would have earned had the entire four calendar quarters of our performance and the employee’s performance for the year equaled the average quarterly performance for all calendar quarters completed prior to termination of the employee’s employment for the year in question.
The Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may, from time to time, amend or terminate the 2005 Plan. No amendment or modification of the 2005 Plan will adversely affect any outstanding award previously granted. Under its terms the 2005 Plan will terminate in March 2016.
16

2010 Plan
The 2010 Plan initially reserved 7,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance pursuant to the terms of the plan upon the grant of restricted stock awards, deferred stock grants, stock appreciation rights and/or the exercise of options granted under the 2010 Plan. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2010 Plan was reduced to 700,000 shares in December 2010 following the reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock on the same ratio. In March 2012, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2010 Plan which added an additional 2,500,000 shares of our common stock to the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan provides that, in the event of any dividend (other than a cash dividend) payable on shares of our common stock, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or exchange of shares, or other similar event occurring after the grant of an award which results in a change in the shares of our common stock as a whole, (i) the number of shares issuable in connection with any such award and the purchase price thereof, if any, will be proportionately adjusted to reflect the occurrence of any such event and (ii) the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee will determine whether such change requires an adjustment in the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2010 Plan or to retain the number of shares reserved and available under the plan in their sole discretion. Any adjustment, however, does not change the total purchase price payable for the shares subject to outstanding options. In the event of our proposed dissolution or liquidation, a proposed sale of all or substantially all of our assets, a merger or tender offer for our shares of common stock, the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee may declare that each option granted under the plan shall terminate as of a date to be fixed by the committee; provided that not less than 30 days written notice of the date so fixed shall be given to each participant holding an option, and each such participant shall have the right, during the period of 30 days preceding such termination, to exercise the participant’s option, in whole or in part, including as to options not otherwise exercisable.
The 2010 Plan also contains an “evergreen formula” pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2010 Plan will automatically increase on the first trading day of January each calendar year during the term of the 2010 Plan, beginning with calendar year 2011, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day in December of the immediately preceding calendar year, up to a maximum annual increase of 250,000 shares of common stock. As a result of the application of this evergreen formula and the amendment, the number of shares of our common stock currently reserved for issuance under grants to be made under the 2010 Plan is 1,850,660 shares.
The 2010 Plan provides for the grant of restricted stock awards, deferred stock grants, stock appreciation rights, incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options. In addition, the 2010 Plan allows for the inclusion of a reload option provision, which permits an eligible person to pay the exercise price of the option with shares of common stock owned by the eligible person and receive a new option to purchase shares of common stock equal in number to the tendered shares. Furthermore, restricted stock grants may also be made, as well as deferred stock grants and stock appreciation rights. Subject to the limitation on the aggregate number of shares issuable under the plan, there is no maximum or minimum number of shares as to which a stock grant or plan option may be granted to any person. Shares used for stock grants and plan options may be authorized and unissued shares or shares reacquired by us, including shares purchased in the open market.
All plan options are nonassignable and nontransferable, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and during the lifetime of the optionee, may be exercised only by such optionee, except as provided by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee. If an optionee shall die while our employee or within three months after termination of employment by us because of disability, retirement or otherwise, such options may be exercised, to the extent that the optionee shall have been entitled to do so on the date of death or termination of employment, by the person or persons to whom the optionee’s right under the option pass by will or applicable law, or if no such person has such right, by his executors or administrators. Options are also subject to termination by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee under certain conditions.
In the event of termination of employment because of death while an employee, or because of disability, the optionee’s options may be exercised not later than the expiration date specified in the option or one year after the optionee’s death, whichever date is earlier, or in the event of termination of employment because of retirement or otherwise, not later than the expiration date specified in the option or one year after the optionee’s death, whichever date is earlier. If an optionee’s employment by us terminates because of disability and such optionee does not die within the following three months after termination, the options may be exercised, to the extent that the optionee shall have been entitled to do so at the date of the termination of employment, at any time, or from time to time, but not later than the expiration date specified in the option or one year after termination of employment, whichever date is earlier. If an optionee’s employment terminates for any reason other than death or disability, the optionee may exercise the options to the same extent that the options were exercisable on the date of termination, for up to three months following such termination, or on or before the expiration date of the options, whichever occurs first. In the event that the optionee was not entitled to exercise the options at the date of termination or if the optionee does not exercise such options (which were then exercisable) within the time specified herein, the options shall terminate. If an optionee’s employment terminates for any reason other than death, disability or retirement, all rights to exercise the option will terminate not later than 90 days following the date of such termination of employment, except as otherwise provided under the plan. Non-qualified options are not subject to the foregoing restrictions unless specified by the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee.
17

The Board of Directors may amend, suspend or terminate the 2010 Plan at any time, except that no amendment shall be made which:
increases the total number of shares subject to the plan in excess of the evergreen formula or changes the minimum purchase price therefore (except in either case in the event of adjustments due to changes in our capitalization),
affects outstanding options or any exercise right thereunder,
extends the term of any option beyond 10 years, or
extends the termination date of the plan.
Unless the 2010 Plan is suspended or terminated by the Board of Directors, the 2010 Plan will terminate in June 2020. Any termination of the 2010 Plan will not affect the validity of any options previously granted thereunder.

ITEM 12.  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The information required by this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.

At March 31, 2014, we had 23,505,731 of common stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth information known to us as of March 31, 2014 relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by:

each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
each director and nominee;
each named executive officer; and
all named executive officers and directors as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner in the table set forth below is care of Inuvo, Inc., 1111 Main Street, Suite 201, Conway, Arkansas 72032. We believe that all persons, unless otherwise noted, named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as being owned by them. Under securities laws, a person is considered to be the beneficial owner of securities owned by him (or certain persons whose ownership is attributed to him) and that can be acquired by him within 60 days from the that date, including upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. We determine a beneficial owner’s percentage ownership by assuming that options, warrants or convertible securities that are held by him, but not those held by any other person, and which are exercisable within 60 days of the that date, have been exercised or converted.
Name of Beneficial Owner No. of Shares Beneficially Owned  % of Class 
       
Charles Morgan 1
  2,067,315   8.5%
Pat Terrell 2
  525,000   2.2%
Richard K. Howe 3
  751,750   3.1 
John B. Pisaris 4
  276,621   1.1%
Wallace D. Ruiz 5
  225,519   * 
Joe Durrett  107,612   * 
Don Walker “Trey” Barrett III 6
  198,888   * 
Charles L. Pope 7
  107,631   * 
All named executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group (eight persons)  4,260,336   17.5%
William Blair & Company, L.L.C. 8
222 West Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60606
  2,157,990   8.9%
———————
*   represents less than 1%
1    Includes 1,228,315 shares of common stock held in a separate account (the "Separately Managed Account") managed by Bridgehampton Capital Management LLC ("BCM") for Charles D. Morgan. BCM is the sole manager of Bridgehampton Multi-Strategy Fund LLC (f/k/a Bridgehampton Arbitrage LLC, "Multi-Strategy Fund") and Bridgehampton Monument Fund LLC ("Monument Fund", and together with the Multi-Strategy Fund, the "Funds") and the manager of the Separately Managed Account. The Multi-Strategy Fund directly owns 350,000 shares of common stock and the Monument Fund directly owns 315,000 shares of common stock. Kenneth E. Lee is the managing member of BCM. Mr. Morgan, a member of BCM, has joint trading authority with respect to the shares of the issuer held by the Funds and in the Separately Managed Account. Therefore, each of BCM and Mr. Lee may be deemed to share beneficial ownership (but only partial pecuniary interest) of the shares beneficially owned by the Funds and the Separately Managed Account. Includes 174,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options, restricted stock grants and warrants exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
2    Includes 35,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
3    Includes 390,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock grants exercisable within 60 days ofMarch 31, 2014.
4    Includes 186 shares and 1,985 shares, respectively, held by Mr. Pisaris' minor children and 5,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of restricted stock grants within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
5    Includes 93,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock grants exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
6    Includes 88,334 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock grants exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
7    Includes 24,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and restricted stock grants exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2014.
8    Based on Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2014.
18

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders as well as any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders as of December 31, 2013.
Plan category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights(a)  Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a) 
             
Plans approved by our stockholders:            
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan  656,946  $0.12   14,343 
2010 Equity Compensation Plan  364,370  $1.96   2,260,752 
Plans not approved by stockholders  982,551  $9.62   0 

ITEM 13.  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS,
In January 2013, we entered into a Sublease with First Orion Corp., an affiliate of one of our principal stockholders and director, Charles D. Morgan. Under the terms of the Sublease, which expires in February 2015, we lease approximately 5,834 square feet of office space in Conway, Arkansas for a monthly rental of $8,400. In April 2013, we entered into a Services Agreement with First Orion Corp. whereby we provide each other with office and technical support services on a cost plus 30% basis. The fees under the Services Agreement fluctuate depending on usage, however, we do not expect them to be material. Other than these transactions, there have been no transactions since January 1, 2012 nor are there any currently proposed transactions in which we were or are to be participant in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Director IndependenceThe information required by this item will be contained in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.

Messrs. Morgan, Pope, Durrett and Terrell are considered independent directors under the definition included in the NYSE Amex Company Guide.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided for the years indicated.

  2013  2012 
       
Audit Fees $327,769  $309,372 
Audit-Related Fees  -   63,945 
Tax Fees  108,082   146,540 
All Other Fees  -   - 
Total $435,851  $519,857 

Audit Fees — This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements includedinformation required by this item will be contained in our quarterly reportsProxy Statement and services that are normally providedis incorporated herein by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those years.  This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.this reference.

Audit-Related Fees — This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.”  The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the SEC and other accounting consulting.

Tax Fees — This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice.  The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

Policy on Pre-Approval of Fees

The Audit Committee charter includes the procedures for pre-approval of all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm.  Under the procedure, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The audit and tax fees paid to the auditors with respect to 2013 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

19

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
 
1.  Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements and Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm are listed in the “Index to Financial Statements and Schedules” beginning on page F-1 and included on pages F-2 through F-25.F-19.

2.  Financial Statement Schedules
 
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are either not required under the related instructions, are not applicable (and therefore have been omitted), or the required disclosures are contained in the consolidated financial statements herein.

3.   Exhibits (including those incorporated by reference).

Exhibit No. Description of Exhibit
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated June 5, 2009 between Inuvo, Inc. and Kowabunga! Inc. (Incorporated by reference and filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2009.)
2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 16, 2011 between Inuvo, Inc., Anhinga Merger Subsidiary, Inc. and Vertro, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as fled on October 17, 2011.)
3(i).1 Articles of Incorporation, as amended)Incorporated by reference and filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2004.)
3(i).2 Amended to Articles of Incorporation filed March 14, 2005 (Incorporated by reference and filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2006.)
3(i).3 Articles of Merger between Inuvo, Inc. and Kowabunga! Inc. (Incorporated by reference and filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2009.)
3(i).4 Certificate of Change Filed Pursuant to NRS 78.209 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on September 30, 2010.)
3(i).5 Certificate of Merger as filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada on February 29, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
3(i).6 Articles of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation as filed on February 29, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
3(ii).1 Amended and Restated By-Laws (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2010.)
3(ii).2 Bylaw amendment adopted February 29, 2012 (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
4.1 Form of warrant to purchase shares of Registrant for 2009 consultants (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
4.2Form of warrant to purchase shares of Registrant for 2011 offering.  (Incorporated by reference and filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 22, 2011.)
4.34.2 Form of warrant to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock issued to Alliance Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
4.44.3 Form of warrant to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock issued to Alliance Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
4.54.4 Form of warrant to purchase 51,724 shares pursuant to the Second Business Financing Modification Agreement with Bridge Bank, National Association, dated October 11, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012.)
10.1 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on December 10, 2010.)
10.2 Lease Agreement, dated August 10, 2007, by and between Lightwave Drive, LLC and Think Partnership, Inc., as amended2015 Long Term Equity Incentive Program (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's AnnualRegistrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q as filed on MarchJuly 29, 2012.2015.)


10.3 Lease dated February 29, 2000 by and between Alot, Inc. (formerly Comet Systems, Inc.) and The Rector, Church-Wardens and Vestrymen of Trinity Church in New York, a religious corporation in the State of New York, including the previous amendment dated August 8, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
10.4 Lease Modification and Extension Agreement by and between Alot, Inc.(formerly known as MIVA Direct, Inc.) and The Rector, Church-Wardens and Vestrymen of Trinity Church in New York, dated February 23, 2006. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
10.5 Consent to Sublease with Trinity Church effective April 12, 2013 regarding the Company's New York office. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on May 9, 2013).
10.6 Third Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated March 29, 2013, effective May 1, 2013, with Bridge Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on May 9, 2013).
10.7 Lease with First Orion Corp. effective March 1, 2013 regarding the Company's Conway, AR office. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on May 9, 2013).
10.8 Amendment No. 8 to Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract effective as of September 1, 2013, executed and delivered October 10, 2013. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant’sRegistrant's Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on January 17, 2014).**
10.9 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A as filed on April 30, 2010.)
10.110.10 Amendment to Lease Agreement, dated as of July 25, 2012, between Capital Growth of Clearwater, LLC, and Inuvo,April 8, 2015, with Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2012.April 29, 2015.)
20

10.11 First Business Financing Modification Agreement with Bridge Bank, National Association, dated June 29, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2012.)
10.12 Agreement dated June 15, 2011, executed October 20, 2011, between Inuvo, Inc. and Alliance Advisors, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed on March 29, 2012.)
10.13Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2012 between Inuvo, Inc. and Richard K. Howe (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.1410.13 Second Business Financing Modification Agreement with Bridge Bank, National Association, dated October 11, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2012.)
10.1510.14 Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2012 between Inuvo, Inc. and Wallace D. Ruiz (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.1610.15 Employment Agreement dated March 1, 2012 between Inuvo, Inc. and John B. Pisaris (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.1710.16 Amendment dated February 29, 2012 to 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.1810.17 Business Financing Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, with Bridge Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.18Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, between Inuvo, Inc. and Bridge Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.19 Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, between Inuvo, Inc.subsidiaries and Bridge Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.2Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated March 1, 2012, between subsidiaries and Bridge Bank, National Association (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on March 6, 2012.)
10.2110.20 Release Agreement dated December 19, 2012 by and between Peter A. Corrao and Inuvo, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 19, 2012.)
10.2210.21 Quick Action Closing Fund Grant Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, with the Arkansas Economic Development Commission. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013).
10.2310.22 Grant Reimbursement Agreement, dated January 25, 2013, with the Arkansas Economic Development Commission. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013).
10.2410.23 
Google Services Agreement, as ofeffective February 1, 2013, between2015, with Google, Inc. and Vertro, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 tothe Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 21, 2013). **April 29, 2015.)

10.2510.24 Lease Termination Agreement, dated
Amendment #11 to Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract, effective January 29, 2013, between Inuvo, Inc.15, 2016, executed and Capital Growth of Clearwater, LLC. (Incorporateddelivered January 26, 2015.(Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed withfor the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013)year ended December 31, 2015).




10.26
10.25 Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract, dated April 4, 2009, as amended. (Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 28, 2012).**
10.2710.26 Fourth Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated March 6th,6, 2014, with Bridge Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
10.27Fifth Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated September 29, 2014 with Bridge Bank N.A. (Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014).
10.28Bridge Bank BFA Modification, dated October 9, 2014 (Incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2014).
10.29Amendment #12 to Yahoo! Publisher Network Contract, effective March 2, 2016. (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016).
10.30Sixth Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated September 27, 2016 with Bridge Bank N.A. (Incorporated by reference to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016).
10.31Seventh Business Financing Modification Agreement, dated December 9, 2016 with Bridge Bank N.A.***
10.32Google Services Agreement, dated February 28, 2017.*
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant***Registrant (Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2013).*
23.1 Consent of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.****
31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificationcertification of Chief Executive Officer ****
31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certificationcertification of Chief Financial Officer ****
 Section 1350 Certificationcertification of Chief Executive Officer *
 Section 1350 Certificationcertification of Chief Financial Officer *
101.INS XBRL Instance Document ***/****
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document ***/****
1010.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document ***/****
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document ***/****
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ***/****
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ***/****
 
* filed herewith
 
**           Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission under Rule 24b-2 The omitted confidential material has been filed separately with the Commission. The location of the omitted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit with asterisks (***).


***           In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 to this report shall be deemed furnished and not filed.

****           Previously filed.
21

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 Inuvo, Inc. 
    
April 3, 2014February 16, 2017By:/s/ Wallace D. Ruiz 
  Chief Financial Officer 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Richard K. HoweChairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, and principal executive officerFebruary 16, 2017
Richard K. Howe
/s/ Wallace D. RuizChief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officerFebruary 16, 2017
Wallace D. Ruiz
/s/ G. Kent BurnettDirectorFebruary 16, 2017
G. Kent Burnett
/s/ Gordon J. CameronDirectorFebruary 16, 2017
Gordon J. Cameron
/s/ Charles D. MorganDirectorFebruary 16, 2017
Charles D. Morgan
/s/ Charles L. PopeDirectorFebruary 16, 2017
Charles L. Pope
/s/ Patrick TerrellDirectorFebruary 16, 2017
Patrick Terrell


INUVO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Inuvo, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Inuvo, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016.  The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on the test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Inuvo, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
 
/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.

Clearwater, Florida

February 16, 2017

Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
For the Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Assets   
Current assets   
Cash$3,946,804
 $4,257,204
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $23,000 and $17,200, respectively7,586,129
 7,001,337
Unbilled revenue8,644
 16,154
Prepaid expenses and other current assets284,469
 345,752
Total current assets11,826,046
 11,620,447
Property and equipment, net1,615,223
 1,805,561
Other assets   
Goodwill5,760,808
 5,760,808
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization8,343,876
 9,320,951
Other assets15,186
 224,759
Total other assets14,119,870
 15,306,518
Total assets$27,561,139
 $28,732,526
    
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity   
Current liabilities   
Accounts payable$9,280,779
 $10,080,315
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities2,689,640
 3,169,445
Total current liabilities11,970,419
 13,249,760
    
Long-term liabilities   
Deferred tax liability3,738,500
 3,799,600
Other long-term liabilities326,428
 722,722
Total long-term liabilities4,064,928
 4,522,322
    
Stockholders’ equity   
Preferred stock, $.001 par value:   
Authorized shares 500,000, none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $.001 par value:

 

Authorized shares 40,000,000; issued shares 25,300,189 and 24,752,408 respectively; outstanding shares 24,923,662 and 24,375,881, respectively25,300
 24,752
Additional paid-in capital130,418,413
 129,081,029
Accumulated deficit(117,521,362) (116,748,778)
Treasury stock, at cost - 376,527 shares(1,396,559) (1,396,559)
Total stockholders' equity11,525,792
 10,960,444
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$27,561,139
 $28,732,526
 
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.


Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements Operations
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Net revenue$71,530,102
 $70,438,116
Cost of revenue21,364,795
 23,721,996
Gross profit50,165,307
 46,716,120
Operating expenses   
Marketing costs39,195,653
 34,324,646
Compensation6,830,338
 5,598,804
Selling, general and administrative4,996,482
 4,645,697
Total operating expenses51,022,473
 44,569,147
Operating (loss) income(857,166) 2,146,973
Interest expense, net(99,965) (141,311)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes(957,131) 2,005,662
Income tax benefit29,260
 300,143
Net (loss) income from continuing operations(927,871) 2,305,805
Net income from discontinued operations155,287
 33,969
Net (loss) income$(772,584) $2,339,774
    
Per common share data   
Basic and diluted   
Net (loss) income from continuing operations$(0.04) $0.10
Net income from discontinued operations0.01
 
Net (loss) income$(0.03) $0.10
    
Weighted average shares   
Basic24,660,995
 24,249,852
Diluted24,660,995
 24,539,555
 
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.

22

Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
 Common Stock 
 Additional Paid in Capital
 Accumulated Deficit Treasury Stock Total
 Shares Stock    
Balances as of December 31, 201423,711,100
 $24,087
 $128,734,759
 $(119,088,552) $(1,396,559) $8,273,735
Net income
 
 
 2,339,774
 
 2,339,774
Stock-based compensation
 
 707,544
 
 
 707,544
Stock issued for vested restricted stock awards664,781
 665
 (110,192) 
 
 (109,527)
Taxes withheld on vested restricted stock
 
 (251,082) 
 
 (251,082)
Balances as of December 31, 201524,375,881
 $24,752
 $129,081,029
 $(116,748,778) $(1,396,559)
$10,960,444
Net (loss)
 
 
 (772,584) 
 (772,584)
Stock-based compensation
 
 1,264,266
 
 
 1,264,266
Stock issued for vested restricted stock awards396,997
 397
 (397) 
 
 
Taxes withheld on vested restricted stock
 
 (203,836) 
 
 (203,836)
Contingent stock issuance166,667
 167
 299,834
 
 
 300,001
Treasury Stock Repurchase(15,883) (16) (22,483) 
 
 (22,499)
Balances as of December 31, 201624,923,662
 $25,300
 $130,418,413
 $(117,521,362) $(1,396,559) $11,525,792

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.




Inuvo, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
 2016 2015
Operating activities:   
Net (loss) income$(772,584) $2,339,774
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization2,209,738
 1,807,350
Stock based compensation1,264,266
 707,544
Provision (Recovery) for doubtful accounts5,800
 (6,036)
Adjustment of European liabilities related to discontinued operations(176,988) (59,751)
Deferred income taxes(61,100) 233,480
Amortization of financing fees25,600
 19,804
Settlement of tax liability
 (406,453)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:   
Prepaid expenses and other assets219,656
 (19,370)
Accounts payable(622,548) 4,545,906
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue(583,082) (2,001,613)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(420,875) (1,054,363)
Other(34,864) 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,053,019
 6,106,272
    
Investing activities:   
Purchases of equipment and capitalized development costs(1,116,371) (1,525,888)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,116,371) (1,525,888)
    
Financing activities:   
Proceeds from revolving line of credit7,950,000
 4,000,000
Prepaid financing fees25,600
 25,600
Payments on revolving line of credit(7,950,000) (5,793,275)
Net taxes paid on RSU grants exercised(203,836) (360,608)
Payments on term note payable and capital leases(46,313) (1,909,422)
Treasury Stock Repurchase(22,499) 
Net cash used in financing activities(247,048) (4,037,705)
    
Net change – cash(310,400) 542,679
Cash, beginning of year4,257,204
 3,714,525
Cash, end of year$3,946,804
 $4,257,204
    
Supplemental information:   
Interest paid$72,751
 $122,136
Income taxes paid, net of refund$26,000
 $280,453
Cash received from construction allowance$
 200,000
Non-cash investing and financing activities:   
Purchase of property and equipment under capital lease$
 $103,609
Purchase of intangible assets through a contingent liability$
 $715,874
Stock issuance for partial settlement of contingent liability$300,001
 $
Write-down of domain names due to partial settlement of contingent liability$46,367
 $
 
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm and notes to the consolidated financial statements.


Inuvo, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Note 1 – Organization and Business
Company Overview
Inuvo, Inc. is an internet advertising technology and digital publishing company.

We develop technology that delivers content and advertisements over the internet. We develop direct to consumer marketing technology to acquire consumers for our content. We develop analytics and optimization technologies to align advertisements with consumers. We generate revenue when an end user clicks on the advertisements we delivered. We manage our business as two segments, the Partner Network (advertising technology) and the Owned and Operated Network (digital publishing).
Within the Partner Network, we recruit online publishers and provide them an advertising delivery service, the primary brand for which is SearchLinks©. This service allows publishers the ability to place Inuvo ad-technology in various locations and configurations within their website or app for either a desktop or mobile implementation. We generate revenue in this segment when an advertisement that is delivered is subsequently clicked on by a consumer. Advertisements can be served by either Inuvo or a third party depending on the needs of the publisher. Typically, we collect revenue from advertisers when an advertisement is clicked and then share a portion of the revenue with the publisher. We deliver well in excess of a billion such advertisements annually.

The Owned and Operated Network designs, builds and markets consumer websites and applications. This segment consists of our main online property marketed under the ALOT brand and a number of other websites targeted at specific demographics like EARNSPENDLIVE and sites designed specifically for generating leads in a specific market vertical like ASKTHIS for automotive. The majority of revenue generated by this segment is derived from advertisements that have been delivered on web pages that include both Inuvo content and advertisements. Our ALOT branded websites and applications have a broad appeal focusing on popular topics such as health, finance, careers, local search, travel, living, education and auto.

We have a number of highly differentiated and proprietary strengths that include; long standing advertising relationships with Yahoo and Google from whom we source advertising inventory which we distribute through our own online properties or through those of third party publishers; the ability to serve hundreds of millions of advertisements to any device or browser in milliseconds; the ability to both self-market and self-monetize our own publishing business; the ability to test advertising technology within our own publishing business; the ability to target advertisements based on website content, past behavior or to redirect users back to Inuvo content when the economics and alignment are optimized; the ability to expand to other geographies where appropriate; the ability to develop and publish content just-in-time to meet demand from advertisers; a low cost operation in central Arkansas with access to numerous universities, and a proprietary technology infrastructure developed by, and in some cases patented by Inuvo.

We plan to continue growing our website and mobile application business by expanding the ALOT brand and acquiring new websites where appropriate. We will continue to distribute SearchLinks broadly throughout the Internet by growing our network of publishers. Financially, we are focused on growth while maintaining a positive cash flow. We expect to continue to make strategic investments principally in these areas; marketing technology associated with direct to consumer acquisition; the SearchLinks platform, and advertising targeting analytics.

Liquidity

On September 27, 2016, we renewed our Business Financing Agreement with Western Alliance Bank ("Western Alliance Bank"), the parent company of Bridge Bank, N.A., our original lender (see Note 6, "Notes Payable"). The renewal provided continued access to the revolving line of credit up to $10 million through September 2018. As of December 31, 2016, the balance of the revolving line of credit was zero. The revolving line of credit had approximately $6.0 million in availability at December 31, 2016. During the first quarter of 2014, we filed an S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to replace the existing, expiring S-3 "shelf" registration statement. Though we believe the revolving line of credit and cash generated by operations will provide sufficient cash for operations over the next twelve months, we may still elect to sell stock to the public or to selected investors, or borrow under the current or any replacement line of credit or other debt instruments in order to fund the development of our technologies, make acquisitions, pursue new business opportunities or grow existing businesses.



Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation - The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and cash equivalents - Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Revenue recognition - We recognize revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) ASC 605-10 Revenue Recognition-General when the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fees are fixed and determinable, no significant obligations remain and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.
Most of our revenue is generated through clicks on advertisements presented on our properties or those of our partners. We recognize revenue from clicks in the period in which the click occurs. Payments to partners who display advertisements on our behalf are recognized as cost of revenue. Revenue from data sales and commissions is recognized in the period in which the transaction occurs and the other revenue recognition criteria are met.

Accounts receivable - Accounts receivable consists of trade receivables from customers. We record accounts receivable at its net realizable value, recognizing an allowance for doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of probable credit losses on our existing accounts receivable. Balances are written off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the possibility of recovery is considered remote.
Marketing costs - Marketing costs include the purchase of sponsored listings from search engines and is our primary method of attracting consumers to our owned and operated applications and websites. We expense these costs as incurred and present them as a separate line item in operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

Property and equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized while maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of assets sold or retired and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from accounts and the net gain or loss is reflected as an operating expense in the statements of operations.
Property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over three years for equipment, five to seven years for furniture and fixtures and two to three years for software. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. Depreciation expense was $1,279,030 and $882,105, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Capitalized Software Costs - We capitalize certain costs related to internally developed software and amortize these costs using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the software, generally two years. We do not sell internally developed software. Certain development costs not meeting the criteria for capitalization, in accordance with ASC 350-40 Internal-Use Software, are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill - Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. In accordance with ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“ASC 350”), we test goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level (operating segment or one level below an operating segment) on an annual basis or more frequently if we believe indicators of impairment exist. The performance of the test involves a two-step process. The first step of the impairment test involves comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with their aggregate carrying value, including goodwill.

We generally determine the fair value of our reporting units using the income approach methodology of valuation that includes the undiscounted cash flow method as well as other generally accepted valuation methodologies. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, we perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to determine the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the implied fair value of the affected reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill (See Note 5).

During 2016 and 2015, we elected to proceed directly to the two-step testing process. We determined there was no impairment of goodwill during 2016 and 2015.

See Note 5, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, for more information.



Intangible Assets - We allocate a portion of the purchase price of acquisitions to identifiable intangible assets and we amortize definite-lived assets over their estimated useful lives. We consider our indefinite-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

We amortize our identifiable intangible assets, which result from acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Trade names are not amortized as they are believed to have an indefinite life. Trade names are reviewed annually for impairment under ASC 350.

As a result of our acquisition of Vertro, Inc. ("Vertro") in March 2012, we recognized an asset for the customer relationship with Google of $8,820,000 and assigned it a useful life of 20 years. A primary reason for acquiring Vertro was its relationship with Google. Up to the time of the acquisition, we principally had access to the Yahoo! inventory of advertisements. Among the many valuable assets acquired in the Vertro transaction was this Google relationship and the access it provided to an enormous inventory of advertisements. In addition, we acquired the ALOT brand, whose products are monetized through Google and has historically produced a better margin than monetization through Yahoo!. In determining the useful life of this asset, we considered the strategic importance of Vertro's strong relationship with Google. Vertro and its predecessor company had contracts and successful renewals with Google that date back to 2006. The Google contract has been extended through February 28, 2017. We expect the relationship with Google to continue through the 20-year amortization period and beyond.

At the time of the Vertro acquisition, we engaged a third party valuation service to determine the fair value of the acquired assets. At the close of the 2016 and 2015 fiscal years, we again engaged a third party valuation service to reassess the fair value of the acquired assets.

From time to time, both search marketplaces, Google and Yahoo!, may implement policy or marketplace changes. In January 2013 Google requested changes to our agreement that impacted marketing programs for one of our ALOT products, the Appbar, the result of which was a decline in the number of product installs. Since acquiring the ALOT brand in the Vertro acquisition, we have materially expanded the brand into a number of additional owned and operated websites and applications. We expect products within the brand to ebb and flow as customer preferences change and Google adjusts its marketplace policies. At the close of 2013, we considered the Google change and decided to transition out of the Appbar product and replace it with web properties that we develop. At the close of 2014, we determined that the asset continued to be recoverable despite the impact to the Appbar product and our decision to transition away from it. We made this determination in part because during 2014 we completely replaced the revenue and margin from the Appbar product with other ALOT-branded and Google monetized products. Between websites and applications, we have launched more than 20 new ALOT-branded products beginning in 2013 and we expect to continue aggressively building out our Owned and Operated Network segment into the future.

In May 2015, we purchased two domain websites and recorded the purchase at $715,874.

We recorded no impairment of intangible assets during 2016 or 2015. 

See Note 5, Intangible Assets and Goodwill, for more information.

Income taxes - We utilize the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under the liability method, deferred taxes are determined based on the temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, we must project future levels of taxable income, which requires significant judgment. We examine evidence related to the history of taxable losses or income, the economic conditions in which we operate, organizational characteristics, our forecasts and projections, as well as factors affecting liquidity. We believe it is more likely than not that essentially none of our deferred tax assets will be realized, and we have recorded a full valuation for the net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

We have adopted certain provisions of ASC 740. This statement clarifies the criteria that an individual tax position must satisfy for some or all of the benefits of that position to be recognized in a company’s financial statements.  ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold of more likely than not, and a measurement attribute for all tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, in order to be recognized in the financial statements.



Impairment of long-lived assets - In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the asset is measured by comparison of the carrying amount to future undiscounted cash flows the asset is expected to generate. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value.  

Stock-based compensation - We value stock compensation based on the fair value recognition provisions ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, which establishes accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services and requires companies to expense the estimated grant date fair value of stock awards over the requisite employee service period.

The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of the grant. To value stock option awards, we use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. This model involves assumptions including the expected life of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield and exercise price. We recognize compensation expense in earnings over the requisite service period, applying a forfeiture rate to account for expected forfeitures of awards.

See Note 10, Stock-Based Compensation, for further details on our stock awards.

Government Grant- During the first quarter of 2013, we received a grant from the state of Arkansas to relocate our corporate headquarters to Conway, AR. We recognize the grant funds into income as a reduction of the related expense in the period in which those expenses are recognized. We defer grant funds related to capitalized costs and classify them as current or long-term liabilities on the balance sheet according to the classification of the associated asset. Grant funds received are presented on the consolidated statements of cash flows as operating or investing cash flows depending on the classification of the underlying spend.

Treasury Stock - The cost method was used in recording the purchase of the treasury stock.  Treasury stock changes as a result of common stock we acquire in the market.

Earnings per share - During the periods presented, we had securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  We reported a net loss for 2016 and therefore, shares associated with stock options, warrants and restricted stock are not included because they are anti-dilutive.  Basic and diluted net loss per share is the same for all periods presented.   

For the year ended December 31, 2015, options to purchase 312,331 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $4.51 per share and warrants to purchase 656,112 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $2.45 per share were excluded from the diluted shares calculation for 2015 because their exercise price was higher than the average stock price for the period. In addition, restricted stock units totaling 971,055 shares with a weighted average grant date price of $3.41 were also excluded because the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Operating segments - ASC 280, Segment Reporting, requires disclosures of certain information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas in which we operate, and their major customers. We have evaluated the effect of this standard and have determined that we currently operate in two segments, the Partner Network and the Owned and Operated Network. See Note 16 for additional segment information.

Concentration of credit risk - We are exposed to concentrations of risk primarily in cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, which are generally not collateralized. Our policy is to place our cash and cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions in order to limit the amount of credit exposure. We do not require collateral from our customers, but our credit extension and collection policies include monitoring payments and aggressively pursuing delinquent accounts. We maintain allowances for potential credit losses. At times, deposits may exceed FDIC limits.

Customer concentrations - At December 31, 2016, we had two individual customers with accounts receivable balances greater than 10% of the gross accounts receivable from continuing operations. These customers combined owed approximately 98.6% of our gross accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The same two customers accounted for 98.3% and 98.0% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Use of estimates - The preparation of financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"), requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of


assets, liabilities, net revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The estimates and assumptions used in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are based upon management’s regular evaluation of the relevant facts and circumstances as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. We regularly evaluate estimates and assumptions related to allowances for returns and redemptions, allowances for doubtful accounts, goodwill and purchased intangible asset valuations, lives of intangible assets, deferred income tax asset valuation allowances, contingent liabilities, including the Arkansas grant contingency, and stock compensation. Actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and such differences could be material.
Litigation and settlement costs - From time to time, we are involved in disputes, litigation and other legal actions. In accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies, we record a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency when both of the following conditions are met: (i) information available prior to issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and (ii) the range of loss can be reasonably estimated. See Note 15 for additional information.

Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which defers by one year the effective date of ASU 2014-09. Accordingly, this guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company plans to adopt this guidance on January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effects, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard will require all leases with durations greater than twelve months to be recognized on the balance sheet and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, although early adoption is permitted. We believe adoption of this standard will have an impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Although we have not completed our assessment, we do not expect the adoption to change the recognition, measurement or presentation of lease expenses within the results of operations. 

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This Update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 3 – Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 2016 2015
Balance at the beginning of the year$17,200
 $86,722
Provision for bad debts6,557
 (6,036)
Charge-offs(874) (67,126)
Recoveries117
 3,640
Balance at the end of the year$23,000
 $17,200



Note 4– Property and Equipment
The net carrying value of property and equipment at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 2016 2015
Furniture and fixtures$241,876
 $230,637
Equipment811,948
 2,815,748
Software6,132,626
 9,856,947
Leasehold improvements441,382
 436,311
Subtotal$7,627,832
 $13,339,643
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(6,012,609) (11,534,082)
Total$1,615,223
 $1,805,561

Note 5 – Intangible Assets and Goodwill
During 2016 and 2015, we evaluated our intangible assets and goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. We elected to omit the qualitative assessment of impairment factors and proceed directly to impairment testing with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. No indication of impairment was noted.

The following is a schedule of intangible assets and goodwill from continuing operations as of December 31, 2016:
 Term 
Carrying
Value
 Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Value 
2016
Amortization
          
Customer list, Google20 years $8,820,000
 $(2,131,500) $6,688,500
 $441,000
Customer list, all other10 years 1,610,000
 (778,186) 831,814
 161,004
Exclusivity agreement1 year 120,000
 (120,000) 
 
Trade names, ALOT (1)5 years 960,000
 (928,000) 32,000
 192,000
Domain websites (2)5 years 669,507
 (267,945) 401,562
 136,704
Trade names, web properties (1)- 390,000
 
 390,000
 
Intangible assets classified as long-term  $12,569,507
 $(4,225,631) $8,343,876
 $930,708
          
Goodwill, Partner Network  $1,776,544
 $
 $1,776,544
 $
Goodwill, Owned and Operated Network  3,984,264
 
 3,984,264
 
Goodwill, total  $5,760,808
 $
 $5,760,808
 $





The following is a schedule of intangible assets and goodwill from continuing operations as of December 31, 2015: 


 Term 
Carrying
Value
 Accumulated Amortization Net Carrying Value 
2015
Amortization
Names database9 months $17,417,397
 $(17,417,397) $
 $
Bundled downloads4.5 months 2,447,075
 (2,447,075) 
 
  Intangible assets classified as current  19,864,472
 (19,864,472) 
 
          
Customer list, Google20 years $8,820,000
 $(1,690,500) $7,129,500
 $441,000
Customer list, all other10 years 1,610,000
 (617,182) 992,818
 161,004
Exclusivity agreement1 year 120,000
 (120,000) 
 
Trade names, ALOT (1)5 years 960,000
 (736,000) 224,000
 192,000
Domain websites (2)5 years 715,874
 (131,241) 584,633
 131,241
Tradenames, web properties (1)- 390,000
 
 390,000
 
Intangible assets classified as long-term  $12,615,874
 $(3,294,923) $9,320,951
 $925,245
          
Goodwill, Partner Network  $1,776,544
 $
 $1,776,544
 $
Goodwill, Owned and Operated Network  3,984,264
 
 3,984,264
 
Goodwill, total  $5,760,808
 $
 $5,760,808
 $
___________

(1)
We have determined ALOT trade name should be amortized over five years and the trade names related to our web properties have an indefinite life and as such are not amortized.

(2)
On May 8, 2015, we purchased two domain websites with a fair value of $715,874. We determined they should be amortized over 5 years (see Note 8). On May 8, 2016, the carrying value was adjusted by approximately $46,000 to reflect the lower price paid as compared to the contingent liability recorded as a result of the change in the price of Inuvo stock from the date of acquisition to the first contingent release of shares.

Our amortization expense over the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
2017$764,240
2018732,240
2019732,240
2020612,858
2021602,004
Thereafter$4,510,294
Total$7,953,876

Note 6 - Notes Payable
On March 1, 2012 we entered into a Business Financing Agreement with Bridge Bank, which is now owned by Western Alliance Bank. The agreement provided us with a $5 million term loan and access to a revolving credit line of up to $10 million which we use to help satisfy our working capital needs. We have provided Western Alliance with a first priority perfected security interest in all of our accounts and personal property as collateral for the credit facility. Available funds under the revolving credit line are 80% of eligible accounts receivable balances plus $1 million up to a limit of $10 million. Eligible accounts receivable is generally defined as those from United States based customers that are not more than 90 days from the date of the invoice. We had approximately $6.0 million available under the credit line as of December 31, 2016. The term loan was paid in full at September 2015.

In September 27, 2016, the Company entered into the Sixth Business Financing Modification Agreement with Western Alliance Bank, the parent company of Bridge Bank, our original lender, that renewed the existing Agreement and modified some terms. The modified terms require a monthly quick ratio of not less than .75 to 1.00; quarterly consolidated revenue shall not negatively deviate more than 20% from projections; and quarterly consolidated Adjusted EBITDA shall not negatively deviate


more than $500,000 from projections. The renewed agreement extended the revolving line of credit to September 2018. While we periodically utilize our line of credit for operating needs, as of December 31, 2016, the balance of the revolving line of credit was zero. We were in compliance with all bank covenants as of December 31, 2016.

Note 7 – Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

The accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 2016 2015
Accrued marketing costs$1,622,737
 $1,404,488
Accrued expenses and other289,435
 294,629
Accrued payroll and commission liabilities250,000
 643,908
Accrued sales allowance250,000
 500,000
Contingent stock due for acquired domains, current portion222,477
 238,625
Capital leases, current portion31,210
 46,313
Deferred Arkansas grant, current portion and accrued reserve13,468
 27,679
Accrued taxes10,313
 13,803
Total$2,689,640
 $3,169,445


Note 8 – Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 2016 2015
Deferred rent$163,165
 $198,323
Contingent stock due for acquired domains, less current portion147,029
 477,249
Accrued taxes, less current portion13,763
 
Deferred Arkansas grant, less current portion2,471
 15,940
Capital leases, less current portion
 31,210
Total$326,428
 $722,722

On May 8, 2015, we purchased two domain websites with a fair value of $715,874 (see Note 5). The purchase consideration is our common stock and is contingent upon the seller attaining specific performance targets over three years. On May 8, 2016, the seller achieved the specific performance target for the first year and as a result, we issued 166,667 shares of common stock. The accrued contingent liability and the related intangible asset, domain websites, were adjusted by approximately $46 thousand to reflect the lower price paid as compared to the contingent liability recorded as a result of the change in the price of Inuvo stock from the date of acquisition to the first contingent release of shares.

Note 9 – Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
 2016 2015
Current tax provision$5,180
 $4,081
Deferred tax benefit(34,440) (304,224)
Total tax benefit$(29,260) $(300,143)










A reconciliation of the expected Federal statutory rate to our actual rate as reported for each of the periods presented is as follows:
 2016 2015
Federal statutory rate34% 34%
State income tax rate, net of federal benefit(1%) %
Permanent differences(2%) 1%
Temporary differences(5%) 4%
New Jersey tax settlement and other% 11%
Change in valuation allowance(22%) (65%)
 4% (15%)

Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are the result of temporary differences between book and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, timing of income and expense recognition of certain items and net operating loss carry-forwards.
We assess temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate the realizability of our deferred tax assets on a regular basis, an exercise that requires significant judgment. In the course of this evaluation we considered our recent history of tax losses, the economic conditions in which we operate, recent organizational changes and our forecasts and projections. We believe it is more likely than not that essentially none of our deferred tax assets will be realized, and we have recorded a valuation allowance for the net deferred tax assets that may not be realized as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

The following is a schedule of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016 and 2015:
 2016 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Net operating loss carry forward$27,202,348
 $34,164,267
Intangible assets2,239,700
 3,909,300
Stock based expenses1,484,900
 1,201,800
Accrued expense311,000
 552,500
Deferred rent69,300
 2,200
Other14,200
 15,000
Allowance for doubtful accounts9,800
 6,900
Subtotal31,331,248
 39,851,967
Less valuation allowance(31,331,248) (39,838,347)
Total
 13,620
Deferred tax liabilities: 
  
Intangibles and Property and Equipment3,702,300
 3,435,700
Other36,200
 363,900
Total3,738,500
 3,799,600
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities)$(3,738,500) $(3,785,980)
The net operating losses amounted to approximately $78,678,000 and expire beginning 2021 through 2036. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Code Section 382, the use of certain of the Company’s net operating loss carry forwards are limited due to a cumulative change in ownership.
We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2013 through 2015. Our state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the same periods.



We recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. We have incurred no penalties and interest for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Note 10 - Stock-Based Compensation
We maintain a stock-based compensation program intended to attract, retain and provide incentives for talented employees and directors and align stockholder and employee interests. Currently, we grant options and restricted stock units ("RSUs") from the 2010 Equity Compensation Plan (“2010 ECP”). Option and restricted stock unit vesting periods are generally up to three years.

Compensation Expense

We recorded stock-based compensation expense for all equity incentive plans of approximately $1,264,266 and $707,544 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total compensation cost not yet recognized at December 31, 2016 was $1,616,631 to be recognized over a weighted-average recognition period of 1.2 years.

Significant Grants and Cancellations

2016
On April 1, 2016, we granted members of our board of directors a total of 63,160 RSUs with a weighted average fair value of $1.90 a share which fully vest on March 31, 2017.

On November 1, 2016 we granted two new members of our board of directors a total of 22,936 RSUs with a weighted average fair value of $1.02 a share which fully vest on March 31, 2017.

2015
On April 20, 2015, we granted members of our board of directors a total of 51,948 RSUs with a weighted average fair value of $2.31 a share which fully vested on March 31, 2016.

On July 27, 2015 and August 4, 2015, we granted certain employees service and performance RSUs totaling 965,500 shares with a weighted average fair value $3.03 per share. The service RSUs vest annually over a three-year period, commencing in July 2016, at the rate of 25% of the grant in year one and year two and the remaining 50% of the grant vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date. The awarding of the performance RSUs in contingent upon achieving certain revenue and profit targets and vest annually, one-third upon each anniversary of the grant date. On July 27, 2016, August 4, 2016, and August 5, 2016, the first measurement period targets were achieved and the number of shares issued totaled 297,690 with a weighted average fair value of $1.32.

Award Information and Activity

The following table summarizes the stock grants outstanding under our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan ("2005 LTIP") and 2010 ECP plans as of December 31, 2016:
 Options Outstanding RSUs Outstanding Options and RSUs Exercised Available Shares Total
2010 ECP250,498
 755,507
 2,365,373
 614,567
 3,985,945
2005 LTIP (*)13,748
 
 950,085
 
 963,833
Total264,246
 755,507
 3,315,458
 614,567
 4,949,778
(*) Expired June 2015

The fair value of restricted stock units is determined using market value of the common stock on the date of the grant.  The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model.  The use of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense and include the expected life of the option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, exercise price, and forfeiture rate. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period.  The forfeiture rate, which is estimated at a weighted average of 0% of unvested options outstanding, is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate. 



At December 31, 2016, the 2005 LTIP and 2010 ECP plans had outstanding options of 264,246 options and all were exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of $0, a weighted average exercise price of $2.84 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 4.2 years.

The following table summarizes our stock option activity under the 2005 LTIP and 2010 ECP plans during 2016:
 Options Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year284,246
 $2.78
Granted
 $
Forfeited, expired or cancelled(20,000) $2.05
Exercised
 $
Outstanding, end of year264,246
 $2.84
Exercisable, end of year264,246
 $2.84

We also have a separate plan which we acquired from Vertro. This plan is not authorized to issue any additional shares. During 2016, the remaining options in the amount of 38,650 shares with a weighted average exercise price of $16.01 expired.

No options were granted during 2016 or 2015.

Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the period commensurate with or longer than the expected life of the options. The expected life of the options is based on the vesting schedule of the option in relation to the overall term of the option. The risk free interest rate is based on the market yield of the U.S. Treasury Bill with a term equal to the expected term of the option awarded. We do not anticipate paying any dividends so the dividend yield in the model is zero.

The following table summarizes our restricted stock activity for 2016:
 Restricted Stock Weighted Average Fair Value
Outstanding, beginning of year1,229,769
 $1.02
Granted96,096
 $1.71
Exercised(539,612) $2.34
Forfeited(30,746) $2.10
Outstanding, end of year755,507
 $2.84

Note 11 – Stockholders Equity

As of December 31, 2016, we have an outstanding warrant for the potential issuance of 51,724 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.87. This warrant was issued in connection with debt issuance. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the warrant outstanding at December 31, 2016 is less than 1.0 year.

Authorized Preferred Stock and Authorized Common Stock

On March 1, 2012, the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada approved an amendment to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation allowing the Company to increase the number of shares of common stock outstanding from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000.

Treasury Stock

On December 9, 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which we may repurchase up to $500,000 of our outstanding common stock. The stock repurchase program will expire on November 30, 2017. During December, we purchased 15,883 shares of treasury stock with a weighted average exercise price of $1.42.





Note 12 – Discontinued Operations

Certain of our subsidiaries previously operated in the European Union ("EU"). Though operations ceased in 2009, statutory requirements require a continued presence in the EU for varying terms until November 2015. Profits and losses generated from the remaining assets and liabilities are accounted for as discontinued operations.

In the third quarter of 2016, our petition with the UK (United Kingdom) Companies House to strike off and dissolve the remaining subsidiary in the EU was approved. As a result, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we recognized income from discontinued operations of $155,287 and $33,969, respectively, due primarily to the adjustment of certain accrued liabilities originating in 2009 and earlier.

Note 13 – Retirement Plan Costs
We provide a 401(k) plan to help our employees prepare for retirement. We match each employee's contributions to the plan up to the first four percent of the employee's annual salary. The matching contribution for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $146,033 and $109,029, respectively.


Note 14 - Leases

We lease certain office space and equipment. As leases expire, it can be expected that they will be renewed or replaced in the normal course of business. Rent expense from continuing operations was approximately $175,469 and $105,446 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2016 are:
 Lease Payments
2017$182,456
2018183,858
2019184,852
2020140,749
Total$691,915

In 2013, we entered into an agreement to lease office space in Conway, Arkansas for two years in the total amount of $193,200 which was prepaid. The lease terminated in February 2015 and continued on a month to month basis through November 2015. First Orion Corp., the lessor of this space, is partially owned by a director and shareholder of Inuvo.

In April 2015, we entered into a five-year agreement to lease office space in Little Rock, Arkansas commencing October 1, 2015, to serve as our headquarters. The new lease is for 12,245 square feet and will cost approximately $171,000 during its first year. Thereafter, the lease payment will increase by 2%. We vacated the Conway, Arkansas premises November 30, 2015.

Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time we may become subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we are currently involved in the following litigation which is not incidental to its business:

Oltean, et al. v. Think Partnership, Inc.; Edmonton, Alberta CA. On March 6, 2008, Kelly Oltean, Mike Baldock and Terry Schultz, former employees, filed a breach of employment claim against Inuvo in The Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Judicial District of Edmonton, Canada, claiming damages for wrongful dismissal in the amount of $200,000 for each of Kelly Oltean and Terry Schultz and $187,500 for Mike Baldock. On March 6, 2008, the same three plaintiffs filed a similar statement of claim against Vintacom Acquisition Company, ULC, a subsidiary of Inuvo, again for wrongful dismissal and claiming the same damages. In October 2009, the two actions were consolidated.  On August 18, 2016, the case was dismissed by a Consent Order whereby the case was dismissed without costs to the Company.








Note 16 - Segments
We operate our business as two segments, Partner Network and Owned and Operated Network, which are described in Note 1.

Listed below is a presentation of net revenue and gross profit for all reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. We currently only track certain assets at the segment level and therefore assets by segment are not presented below.
Revenue by Segment
 2016 2015
 $ % of Revenue $ % of Revenue
Partner Network26,011,543
 36.4% 30,298,532
 43.0%
Owned and Operated Network45,518,559
 63.6% 40,139,584
 57.0%
Total net revenue71,530,102
 100.0% 70,438,116
 100.0%
Gross Profit by Segment
 2016 2015
 $ Gross Profit % $ Gross Profit %
Partner Network4,734,240
 18.2% 6,645,590
 21.9%
Owned and Operated Network45,431,067
 99.8% 40,070,530
 99.8%
Total gross profit50,165,307
 70.1% 46,716,120
 66.3%

Note 17 - Related Party Transactions

In 2016 and 2015, the Company received a total of $101,884 and $107,196, respectively from First Orion Corp., which is partially owned by a director and shareholder of Inuvo, for providing IT services.

Note 18 - Subsequent Events

Google Extension

Inuvo, Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary Vertro, Inc., and Google Inc. entered into Amendment Number One to Google Services Agreement (the “Amendment”) effective as of February 1, 2017. The Amendment extends the term of the underlying Google Services Agreement through February 28, 2017.

NetSeer Acquisition

On February 6, 2017 we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") by and among the Company, NetSeer Acquisition, Inc., a Nevada corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and NetSeer, as seller. NetSeer provides visual monetization solutions for advertisers and publishers. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, we acquired substantially all of the assets of NetSeer in exchange for 3,529,000 shares of our common stock and assumption of outstanding liabilities of approximately $4.2 million related to the acquired business. The total consideration was approximately $9.8 million. Under the terms of an Escrow Agreement (the "Escrow Agreement") 529,350 shares of our common stock issued in the transaction were deposited into escrow pending possible post-closing adjustments to the purchase price related to working capital and audited financial statement adjustments, as well as in connection with possible indemnification claims post-closing. As of the year ending December 31, 2016, NetSeer reported revenue of approximately $20.9 million (unaudited) and assets of $4.5 million (unaudited).


F-19