UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
FORM 10-Q
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Quarterly Period Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
ORor
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Transition Period from ____ to ____
CommissionRegistrants; States of Incorporation;I.R.S. Employer
File NumberAddress and Telephone NumberIdentification Nos.
1-3525AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. (A New York Corporation)13-4922640
333-217143AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC (A Delaware Limited Liability Company)46-1125168
1-3457APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY (A Virginia Corporation)54-0124790
1-3570INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY (An Indiana Corporation)35-0410455
1-6543OHIO POWER COMPANY (An Ohio Corporation)31-4271000
0-343PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA (An Oklahoma Corporation)73-0410895
1-3146SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY (A Delaware Corporation)72-0323455
1 Riverside Plaza, Columbus, Ohio 43215-2373
Telephone (614) 716-1000
CommissionRegistrants;I.R.S. Employer
File NumberAddress and Telephone Number States of IncorporationIdentification Nos.
1-3525AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC.New York13-4922640
333-221643AEP TEXAS INC.Delaware51-0007707
333-217143AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLCDelaware46-1125168
1-3457APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANYVirginia54-0124790
1-3570INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANYIndiana35-0410455
1-6543OHIO POWER COMPANYOhio31-4271000
0-343PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMAOklahoma73-0410895
1-3146SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANYDelaware72-0323455
1 Riverside Plaza,Columbus,Ohio43215-2373
Telephone(614)716-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
RegistrantTitle of each classTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
American Electric Power Company Inc.Common Stock, $6.50 par valueAEPThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
American Electric Power Company Inc.6.125% Corporate UnitsAEPPZThe NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YesxNo¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate websites, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).
YesxNo¨
Indicate by check mark whether the American Electric Power Company, Inc. is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated filer
xAccelerated filer¨Non-accelerated filer¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
Indicate by check mark whether AEP Texas Inc., AEP Transmission Company, LLC, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company are large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, non-accelerated filers, smaller reporting companies, or emerging growth companies.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated filer ¨             Accelerated filer ¨             Non-accelerated filer x   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨
Large Accelerated filerAccelerated filerNon-accelerated filerx
Smaller reporting companyEmerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are shell companies (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes¨Nox
AEP Texas Inc., AEP Transmission Company, LLC, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and are therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction H(2) to Form 10-Q.








Number of shares
of common stock
outstanding of the
Registrants as of
October 26, 2017
American Electric Power Company, Inc.491,883,887
($6.50 par value)
AEP Transmission Company, LLC (a)NA
Appalachian Power Company13,499,500
(no par value)
Indiana Michigan Power Company1,400,000
(no par value)
Ohio Power Company27,952,473
(no par value)
Public Service Company of Oklahoma9,013,000
($15 par value)
Southwestern Electric Power Company7,536,640
($18 par value)

(a)100% interest is held by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
NANot applicable.




Number of shares
of common stock
outstanding of the
Registrants as of
July 27, 2023
American Electric Power Company, Inc.515,176,044 
($6.50 par value)
AEP Texas Inc.100 
($0.01 par value)
AEP Transmission Company, LLC (a)NA
Appalachian Power Company13,499,500 
(no par value)
Indiana Michigan Power Company1,400,000 
(no par value)
Ohio Power Company27,952,473 
(no par value)
Public Service Company of Oklahoma9,013,000 
($15 par value)
Southwestern Electric Power Company3,680 
($18 par value)

(a)100% interest is held by AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc.
NA    Not applicable.



AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
INDEX OF QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-Q
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Page
Number
Glossary of Terms
Forward-Looking Information
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Items 1, 2, 3 and 4 - Financial Statements, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, and Controls and Procedures:
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
AEP Transmission Company, LLCTexas Inc. and Subsidiaries:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Appalachian PowerAEP Transmission Company, LLC and Subsidiaries:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Indiana MichiganAppalachian Power Company and Subsidiaries:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
OhioIndiana Michigan Power Company and Subsidiaries:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Public ServiceOhio Power Company of Oklahoma:and Subsidiaries:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Southwestern Electric PowerPublic Service Company Consolidated:of Oklahoma:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Financial Statements
Southwestern Electric Power Company Consolidated:
Management’s Narrative Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Index of Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants
Controls and Procedures






Part II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.  Risk Factors
Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.  Other Information
Item 6.  Exhibits:  Exhibits
Exhibit 12
SIGNATUREExhibit 31(a)
Exhibit 31(b)
Exhibit 32(a)
Exhibit 32(b)
Exhibit 95
Exhibit 101.INS
Exhibit 101.SCH
Exhibit 101.CAL
Exhibit 101.DEF
Exhibit 101.LAB
Exhibit 101.PRE
SIGNATURE
This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by American Electric Power Company, Inc., AEP Texas Inc., AEP Transmission Company, LLC, Appalachian Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company.  Information contained herein relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. EachExcept for American Electric Power Company, Inc., each registrant makes no representation as to information relating to the other registrants.






GLOSSARY OF TERMS


When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.
TermMeaning
   
AEGCo AEP Generating Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
AEP American Electric Power Company, Inc., an investor-owned electric public utility holding company which includes American Electric Power Company, Inc. (Parent) and majority owned consolidated subsidiaries and consolidated affiliates.
AEP Credit AEP Credit, Inc., a consolidated variable interest entityVIE of AEP which securitizes accounts receivable and accrued utility revenues for affiliated electric utility companies.
AEP EnergyAEP Energy Inc.,Supply LLCA nonregulated holding company for AEP’s competitive generation, wholesale and retail businesses, and a wholly-owned retail electric supplier for customers in Ohio, Illinois and other deregulated electricity markets throughout the United States.subsidiary of AEP.
AEP RenewablesA division of AEP Energy Supply LLC that develops and/or acquires large scale renewable projects that are backed with long-term contracts with creditworthy counter parties.
AEP System American Electric Power System, an electric system, owned and operated by AEP subsidiaries.
AEP TexasAEP Texas Inc., an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
AEP Transmission Holdco AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.
AEPRO
AEPEPAEP River Operations, LLC,Energy Partners, Inc., a subsidiary of AEP dedicated to wholesale marketing and trading, hedging activities, asset management and commercial barge operation soldand industrial sales in November 2015.deregulated markets.
AEPSC American Electric Power Service Corporation, an AEP service subsidiary providing management and professional services to AEP and its subsidiaries.
AEPTCoAEP Transmission Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP Transmission Holdco, andis an intermediate holding company that owns seven wholly-owned transmission companies.the State Transcos.
AEPTCo ParentAEP Transmission Company, LLC, the equity ownerholding company of the State Transcos within the AEPTCo consolidation.
AFUDCAllowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction.
AGRALJAEP Generation Resources Inc., a competitive AEP subsidiary in the Generation & Marketing segment.Administrative Law Judge.
AOCI Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
APCo Appalachian Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief FundingAppalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of APCo and a consolidated variable interest entityVIE formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to the under-recovered ENECExpanded Net Energy Cost deferral balance.
Apple BlossomApple Blossom Wind Holdings LLC, a consolidated VIE of AEP, and tax equity partnership.
APSCArkansas Public Service Commission.
ASUAccounting Standards Update.
AROAsset Retirement Obligations.
ATMAt-the-Market.
Black OakBlack Oak Getty Wind Holdings LLC, a consolidated VIE of AEP, and tax equity partnership.
CAAClean Air Act.
CAIRClean Air Interstate Rule.
CCRCoal Combustion Residual.
CO2
 Carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
CO2e
Carbon dioxide equivalent.
i


TermMeaning
Cook Plant Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, a two-unit, 2,2782,296 MW nuclear plant owned by I&M.
COVID-19Coronavirus 2019, a highly infectious respiratory disease. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a worldwide pandemic.
CSAPRCross-State Air Pollution Rule.
CWIP Construction Work in Progress.
DCC FuelDCC Fuel VI LLC,XIII, DCC Fuel VII,XIV, DCC Fuel VIII,XV, DCC Fuel IXXVI, DCC Fuel XVII and DCC Fuel X,XVIII, consolidated variable interest entitiesVIEs formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning and leasing nuclear fuel to I&M.
DHLC Dolet Hills Lignite Company, LLC, a wholly-owned lignite mining subsidiary of SWEPCo. DHLC is a non-consolidated VIE of SWEPCo.
DIRDry LakeDistribution Investment Rider.Dry Lake Solar Project, a consolidated VIE whose sole purpose is to own and operate a 100 MW solar generation facility in southern Nevada in which AEP owns a 75% interest.
EISEnergy Insurance Services, Inc., a nonaffiliated captive insurance company and consolidated variable interest entityVIE of AEP.
ELGEffluent Limitation Guidelines.
ENECExpanded Net Energy Cost.
Energy SupplyAEP Energy Supply LLC, a nonregulated holding company for AEP’s competitive generation, wholesale and retail businesses, and a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.
Equity UnitsAEP’s Equity Units issued in August 2020.
ERCOT Electric Reliability Council of Texas regional transmission organization.

i



TermMeaning
ESP Electric Security Plans, a PUCO requirement for electric utilities to adjust their rates by filing with the PUCO.
ETTElectric Transmission Texas, LLC, an equity interest joint venture between ParentAEP Transmission Holdco and Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company formed to own and operate electric transmission facilities in ERCOT.
Excess ADITExcess accumulated deferred income taxes.
FACFuel Adjustment Clause.
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Federal EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agency.
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
FGD Flue Gas Desulfurization or scrubbers.
FTRFIPFederal Implementation Plan.
FTRFinancial Transmission Right, a financial instrument that entitles the holder to receive compensation for certain congestion-related transmission charges that arise when the power grid is congested resulting in differences in locational prices.
GAAP Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States of America.
I&M Indiana Michigan Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
IRAOn August 16, 2022 President Biden signed into law legislation commonly referred to as the “Inflation Reduction Act” (IRA).
IRS Internal Revenue Service.
ITCInvestment Tax Credit.
IURCIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission.
KGPCoKingsport Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
KPCo Kentucky Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
KPSC
KPSCKentucky Public Service Commission.
ii


kVTermMeaning
 Kilovolt.
KTCoAEP Kentucky Transmission Company, Inc., an affiliate of KPCo and a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP.
KWhKilowatthour.Kilowatt-hour.
LPSC Louisiana Public Service Commission.
Market Based MechanismMATSAn order fromMercury and Air Toxic Standards.
MaverickMaverick, part of the LPSC established to evaluate proposals to construct or acquire generating capacity. The LPSC directs that the market based mechanism shall be a request for proposal competitive solicitation process.North Central Wind Energy Facilities, consists of 287 MWs of wind generation in Oklahoma.
MISO MidwestMidcontinent Independent Transmission System Operator.
Mitchell PlantA two unit, 1,560 MW coal-fired power plant located in Moundsville, West Virginia. The plant is jointly owned by KPCo and WPCo.
MMBtu Million British Thermal Units.
MPSCMichigan Public Service Commission.
MTM Mark-to-Market.
MW Megawatt.
MWh Megawatthour.Megawatt-hour.
NOx
NAAQS
Nitrogen oxide.National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
Nonutility Money Pool Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain nonutility subsidiaries.
NSRNCWFNew Source Review.North Central Wind Energy Facilities, a joint PSO and SWEPCo project, which includes three Oklahoma wind facilities totaling approximately 1,484 MWs of wind generation.
OATTOpen Access Transmission Tariff.
NOLCNet Operating Loss Carryforward.
NOx
Nitrogen oxide.
OCC Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma.
OHTCoAEP Ohio Phase-in-Recovery FundingOhio Phase-in-Recovery Funding LLC,Transmission Company, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OPCo and a consolidated variable interest entity formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to phase-in recovery property.AEPTCo transmission subsidiary.
OPCo Ohio Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
OPEB Other Postretirement Benefit Plans.Benefits.
OTC Over the counter.Over-the-counter.
OVEC Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, which is 43.47% owned by AEP.
ParentAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc., the equity owner of AEP subsidiaries within the AEP consolidation.
PJM Pennsylvania – New Jersey – Maryland regional transmission organization.
PM Particulate Matter.
PPAPurchase Power and Sale Agreement.
PSAPurchase and Sale Agreement.
PSO Public Service Company of Oklahoma, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
PTCProduction Tax Credit.
PUCO Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.
PUCT Public Utility Commission of Texas.

ii



TermMeaning
Registrant Subsidiaries AEP subsidiaries which are SEC registrants: AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo.
RegistrantsSEC registrants: AEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo.
iii


TermMeaning
Restoration FundingAEP Texas Restoration Funding LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP Texas and a consolidated VIE formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to storm restoration in Texas primarily caused by Hurricane Harvey.
Risk Management Contracts Trading and nontradingnon-trading derivatives, including those derivatives designated as cash flow and fair value hedges.
Rockport PlantA generation plant, jointly owned by AEGCo and I&M, consisting of two 1,310 MW coal-fired generating units near Rockport, Indiana.  AEGCo and I&M jointly-own Unit 1.  In 1989, AEGCo and I&M entered into a sale-and-leaseback transaction with Wilmington Trust Company, an unrelated, unconsolidated trustee for Rockport Plant, Unit 2.
RSRROERetail Stability Rider.Return on Equity.
RPMReliability Pricing Model.
RTO Regional Transmission Organization, responsible for moving electricity over large interstate areas.
Sabine Sabine Mining Company, a lignite mining company that is a consolidated variable interest entityVIE for AEP and SWEPCo.
SECSanta Rita EastSanta Rita East Wind Holdings, LLC, a consolidated VIE whose sole purpose is to own and operate a 302 MW wind generation facility in west Texas in which AEP owns an 85% interest.
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
SEETSIPSignificantly Excessive Earnings Test.State Implementation Plan.
SNF Spent Nuclear Fuel.
SO2
 Sulfur dioxide.
SPP Southwest Power Pool regional transmission organization.
SSOStandard service offer.
State TranscosAEPTCo’s seven wholly-owned, FERC-regulated, transmission-onlyFERC regulated, transmission only electric utilities, each of which isare geographically aligned with AEPAEP’s existing utility operating companies.
SundanceSundance, acquired in April 2021 as part of the North Central Wind Energy Facilities, consists of 199 MWs of wind generation in Oklahoma.
SWEPCo Southwestern Electric Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
TCCTax ReformFormerly AEP Texas Central Company, nowOn December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law legislation referred to as the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (the TCJA). The TCJA includes significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a division of AEP Texas.reduction in the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.
Texas Restructuring LegislationLegislation enacted in 1999 to restructure the electric utility industry in Texas.
TNCFormerly AEP Texas North Company, now a division of AEP Texas.
Transition Funding AEP Texas Central Transition Funding IIII LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AEP Texas Central Transition Funding II LLC and AEP Texas Central Transition Funding III LLC, wholly-owned subsidiaries of TCC and consolidated variable interest entitiesVIE formed for the purpose of issuing and servicing securitization bonds related to Texas Restructuring Legislation.
Transource EnergyTransource Energy, LLC, a consolidated variable interest entityVIE formed for the purpose of investing in utilities which develop, acquire, construct, own and operate transmission facilities in accordance with FERC-approved rates.
Transource MissouriTraverseA 100% wholly-owned subsidiaryTraverse, part of Transource Energy.the North Central Wind Energy Facilities, consists of 998 MWs of wind generation in Oklahoma.
Turk Plant John W. Turk, Jr. Plant, a 600650 MW coal-fired plant in Arkansas that is 73% owned by SWEPCo.
Utility Money Pool Centralized funding mechanism AEP uses to meet the short-term cash requirements of certain utility subsidiaries.
VIEVariable Interest Entity.
Virginia SCC Virginia State Corporation Commission.
Wind Catcher ProjectWind Catcher Energy Connection Project, a joint PSO and SWEPCo project which includes the acquisition of a wind generation facility, totaling approximately 2,000 MW of wind generation, and the construction of a generation interconnection tie-line totaling approximately 350 miles.
WPCo Wheeling Power Company, an AEP electric utility subsidiary.
WVPSCPublic Service Commission of West Virginia.
iv

iii




FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


This report made by the Registrants contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Many forward-looking statements appear in “Item 7“Part I Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of the 2016 Annual Report and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in AEPTCo’s 2016 Annual Report included within AEPTCo’s Registration Statement,this quarterly report, but there are others throughout this document which may be identified by words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “continue” and similar expressions, and include statements reflecting future results or guidance and statements of outlook.  These matters are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.  Forward-looking statements in this document are presented as of the date of this document.  Except to the extent required by applicable law, management undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.  Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are:
ŸEconomic growth or contraction within and changesChanges in economic conditions, electric market demand and demographic patterns in AEP service territories.
ŸThe impact of pandemics and any associated disruption of AEP’s business operations due to impacts on economic or market conditions, costs of compliance with potential government regulations, electricity usage, supply chain issues, customers, service providers, vendors and suppliers.
The economic impact of increased global trade tensions including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and the adoption or expansion of economic sanctions or trade restrictions.
Inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends.
ŸVolatility and disruptions in financial markets precipitated by any cause, including failure to make progress on federal budget or debt ceiling matters or instability in the financial markets,banking industry; particularly developments affecting the availability or cost of capital to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt.
ŸThe availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly (i) if expected sources of capital, such as proceeds from the sale of assets, subsidiaries or tax credits, do not materialize or do not materialize at the level anticipated, and (ii) during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material.
ŸElectric load and customer growth.Decreased demand for electricity.
ŸWeather conditions, including storms and drought conditions, and the ability to recover significant storm restoration costs.
ŸLimitations or restrictions on the amounts and types of insurance available to cover losses that might arise in connection with natural disasters or operations.
The cost of fuel and its transportation, the creditworthiness and performance of fuel suppliers and transporters and the cost of storing and disposing of used fuel, including coal ash and spent nuclear fuel.SNF.
ŸAvailabilityThe availability of fuel and necessary generation capacity and the performance of generation plants and the availability of fuel, including processed nuclear fuel, parts and service from reliable vendors.plants.
ŸThe ability to recover fuel and other energy costs through regulated or competitive electric rates.
ŸThe ability to transition from fossil generation and the ability to build or acquire renewable generation, transmission lines and facilities (including the ability to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals and permits) when needed at acceptable prices and terms, including favorable tax treatment, cost caps imposed by regulators and other operational commitments to regulatory commissions and customers for renewable generation projects, and to recover thoseall related costs.
ŸNew legislation, litigation andor government regulation, including changes to tax laws and regulations, oversight of nuclear generation, energy commodity trading and new or heightened requirements for reduced emissions of sulfur, nitrogen, mercury, carbon, soot or particulate matterPM and other substances that could impact the continued operation, cost recovery and/or profitability of generation plants and related assets.
ŸEvolving public perceptionThe impact of thefederal tax legislation on results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or credit ratings.
The risks associated with fuels used before, during and after the generation of electricity associated with the fuels used or the byproducts and wastes of such fuels, including nuclear fuel.coal ash and SNF.
ŸA reduction in the federal statutory tax rate could result in an accelerated return of deferred federal income taxes to customers.
ŸTiming and resolution of pending and future rate cases, negotiations and other regulatory decisions, including rate or other recovery of new investments in generation, distribution and transmission service and environmental compliance.
ŸResolution of litigation.litigation or regulatory proceedings or investigations.
ŸThe ability to constrain operation and maintenance costs.
v


ŸThe ability to develop and execute a strategy based on a view regarding prices of electricity and gas.
ŸPrices and demand for power generated and sold at wholesale.
ŸChanges in technology, particularly with respect to energy storage and new, developing, alternative or distributed sources of generation.
ŸThe ability to recover through rates any remaining unrecovered investment in generation units that may be retired before the end of their previously projected useful lives.
ŸVolatility and changes in markets for capacity and electricity, coal and other energy-related commodities, particularly changes in the price of natural gas.
ŸThe impact of changing expectations and demands of customers, regulators, investors and stakeholders, including heightened emphasis on environmental, social and governance concerns.
Changes in utility regulation and the allocation of costs within regional transmission organizations,RTOs including ERCOT, PJM and SPP.
ŸThe ability to successfully and profitably manage competitive generation assets, including the evaluation and execution of strategic alternatives for these assets as some of the alternatives could result in a loss.

iv



ŸChanges in the creditworthiness of the counterparties with contractual arrangements, including participants in the energy trading market.
ŸActions of rating agencies, including changes in the ratings of debt.
ŸThe impact of volatility in the capital markets on the value of the investments held by the pension, other postretirement benefit plans,OPEB, captive insurance entity and nuclear decommissioning trust and the impact of such volatility on future funding requirements.
ŸAccounting pronouncementsstandards periodically issued by accounting standard-setting bodies.
ŸOther risks and unforeseen events, including wars and military conflicts, the effects of terrorism (including increased security costs), embargoes, cyber securitynaturally occurring and human-caused fires, cyber-security threats and other catastrophic events.
The ability to attract and retain the requisite work force and key personnel.


The forward-looking statements of the Registrants speak only as of the date of this report or as of the date they are made.  The Registrants expressly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking information.information, except as required by law.  For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see “Risk Factors” in Part I of the 20162022 Annual Report and in Part II of this report. Additionally, see “Risk Factors” in the AEPTCo 2016 Annual Report included within AEPTCo’s Registration Statement.


Investors should note that the Registrants announce material financial information in SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. Based on guidance from the SEC, theThe Registrants may use the Investors section of AEP’s website (www.aep.com) to communicate with investors aboutas a distribution channel for material company information. Financial and other important information regarding the Registrants. ItRegistrants is possible that the financialroutinely posted on and accessible through AEP’s website at www.aep.com/investors/. In addition, you may automatically receive email alerts and other information posted there could be deemed to be material information. The informationabout the Registrants when you enroll your email address by visiting the “Email Alerts” section at www.aep.com/investors/.

Company Website and Availability of SEC Filings

Our principal corporate website address is www.aep.com. Information on AEP’sour website is not incorporated by reference herein and is not part of this report.

Form 10-Q. We make available free of charge through our website our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding AEP.
v
vi








AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW


AEP Consolidated Earnings Attributable to Common Shareholders

Second Quarter of 2023 Compared to Second Quarter of 2022

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders decreased from $525 million in 2022 to $521 million in 2023 primarily due to:

A decrease in weather-related sales volumes.
An increase in interest expense due to higher interest rates and debt balances.
Unfavorable mark-to-market economic hedge activity driven by a decrease in commodity prices.
A gain on the sale of mineral rights in 2022.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Favorable rate proceedings in AEP’s various jurisdictions.
Investment in transmission assets, which resulted in higher revenues and income.
A loss related to the expected sale of the Kentucky Operations in 2022. The expected sale was terminated in April 2023.
An impairment of AEP’s equity investment in Flat Ridge 2 in 2022.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders decreased from $1,239 million in 2022 to $918 million in 2023 primarily due to:

A decrease in weather-related sales volumes.
An increase in interest expense due to higher interest rates and debt balances.
Unfavorable mark-to-market economic hedge activity driven by a decrease in commodity prices.
A loss related to the expected sale of the competitive contracted renewable portfolio in 2023.
A gain on the sale of mineral rights in 2022.

These decreases were partially offset by:

Favorable rate proceedings in AEP’s various jurisdictions.
Investment in transmission assets, which resulted in higher revenues and income.
A loss related to the expected sale of the Kentucky Operations in 2022. The expected sale was terminated in April 2023.
An impairment of AEP’s equity investment in Flat Ridge 2 in 2022.

See “Results of Operations” section for additional information by operating segment.
1


Customer Demand


AEP’s weather-normalized retail sales volumes for the thirdsecond quarter of 2017 decreased2023 increased by 0.7% compared to1.5% from the thirdsecond quarter of 2016. AEP’s third quarter 2017 industrial sales increased by 1.7% compared to the third quarter of 2016. The growth in industrial sales was spread across many industries and most operating companies.2022. Weather-normalized residential sales decreased by 2.4% in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172023 from the second quarter of 2022. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in usage per customer due to the impacts of inflation, partially offset by an increase in customers. Weather-normalized commercial sales increased by 7.7% in the second quarter of 2023 compared to the thirdsecond quarter of 2016. Weather-normalized2022. The increase in commercial sales decreasedwas primarily due to new data center loads and economic development. AEP’s second quarter 2023 industrial sales volumes increased by 1.3% in0.1% from the thirdsecond quarter of 2017 compared to the third quarter of 2016.2022.


AEP’s weather-normalized retail sales volumes for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 decreased2023 increased by 0.4%2.4% compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. Weather-normalized residential sales decreased by 1.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in usage per customer due to the impacts of inflation, partially offset by an increase in customers. Weather-normalized commercial sales increased by 7.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2022. The increase in commercial sales was primarily due to new data center loads and economic development. AEP’s industrial sales volumes for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 increased 1.6%by 2.6% compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2022. The growthincrease in industrial sales was spread across many industriessectors.

Supply Chain Disruption and most operating companies. Weather-normalized residential and commercial sales decreased 1.5% and 1.4%, respectively, forInflation

The Registrants have experienced certain supply chain disruptions driven by several factors including the nine months ended September 30, 2017 comparedCOVID-19 pandemic, international tensions including the ramifications of regional conflict, increased demand due to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Merchant Generation Assets

In September 2016, AEP signed an agreement to sell Darby, Gavin, Lawrenceburg and Waterford Plants (“Disposition Plants”) totaling 5,329 MWs of competitive generation to a nonaffiliated party. The sale closed in January 2017 for approximately $2.2 billion. The net proceedseconomic recovery from the transaction were approximately $1.2 billionpandemic, inflation, labor shortages in cash after taxes, repayment of debt associated with these assetscertain trades and transaction fees, which resulted in an after tax gain of approximately $129 million. AEP primarily used these proceeds to reduce outstanding debt and invest in its regulated businesses including transmission, and contracted renewable projects.

The assets and liabilities includedshortages in the sale transactionavailability of certain raw materials. These supply chain disruptions have been recorded as Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Held for Sale, respectively, on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. See “Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale” section of Note 6 for additional information.

In February 2017, AEP signed an agreement to sell its 25.4% ownership share of Zimmer Plant to Dynegy Corporation. Simultaneously, AEP signed an agreement to purchase Dynegy Corporation’s 40% ownership share of Conesville Plant, Unit 4. The transactions closed in the second quarter of 2017 and did not havehad a material impact on the Registrants net income, cash flows orand financial condition, but have extended lead times for certain goods and services and have contributed to higher prices for fuel, materials, labor, equipment and other needed commodities. Management has implemented risk mitigation strategies in an attempt to mitigate the impacts of these supply chain disruptions.

AEP and its utilities finance its operations with commercial paper and other variable rate instruments. AEP generally uses short-term borrowings to fund working capital needs until long-term funding is arranged. Sources of long-term funding includes the issuance of long-term debt. These financing options to maintain adequate liquidity are subject to fluctuations in interest rates. The United States economy has experienced a significant level of inflation that has contributed to increased uncertainty in the outlook of near-term economic activity, including whether inflation will continue and at what rate. To the extent interest rates continue to increase, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


Management continues to evaluate potential alternatives for the remaining merchant generation assets. These potential alternatives may include, but are not limited to, transfer or sale of AEP’s ownership interests,A prolonged continuation or a wind downfurther increase in the severity of merchant coal-fired generation fleet operations. Management has not set a specific time frame for a decision on these assets. These alternativessupply chain and inflationary disruptions could result in additional lossesincreases in the cost of certain goods, services and cost of capital and further extend lead times which could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


Termination of Planned Disposition of KPCo and KTCo

In October 2021, AEP entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA) to sell KPCo and KTCo to Liberty Utilities Co., a subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (Liberty), for approximately a $2.85 billion enterprise value.The SPA was subsequently amended in September 2022 to reduce the purchase price to approximately $2.646 billion.The sale required approval from the KPSC and from the FERC under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act.The SPA contained certain termination rights if the closing of the sale did not occur by April 26, 2023.

In May 2022, the KPSC approved the sale of KPCo to Liberty subject to certain conditions contingent upon the closing of the sale.In December 2022, the FERC issued an order denying, without prejudice, authorization of the proposed sale stating the applicants failed to demonstrate the proposed transaction will not have an adverse effect on rates.In February 2023, a new filing for approval under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act was
2


submitted.In March 2023, the KPSC and other intervenors made filings recommending the FERC reject AEP and Liberty’s new Section 203 application seeking approval of the sale.

In April 2023, AEP, AEPTCo and Liberty entered into a Mutual Termination Agreement (Termination Agreement) terminating the SPA.The parties entered into the Termination Agreement as all of the conditions precedent to closing the sale could not be satisfied prior to April 26, 2023.

The impact of the Termination Agreement did not have a material impact on AEP’s statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023. Upon reverting to a held and used model in the first quarter of 2023, AEP was required to present its investment in the Kentucky Operations at the lower of fair value or historical carrying value which resulted in a $335 million reduction recorded in Property, Plant and Equipment. The reduced investment in KPCo’s assets is being amortized over the 30 year average useful life of the KPCo assets.

Planned Disposition of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio

In February 2022, AEP management announced the initiation of a process to sell all or a portion of AEP Renewables’ competitive contracted renewables portfolio within the Generation & Marketing segment. As of June 30, 2023, the competitive contracted renewable portfolio assets totaled 1.4 gigawatts of generation resources representing consolidated solar and wind assets, with a net book value of $1.2 billion, and a 50% interest in four joint venture wind farms, totaling $246 million, accounted for as equity method investments.

In late January 2023, AEP received final bids from interested parties. In February 2023, AEP’s Board of Directors approved management’s plan to sell the competitive contracted renewables portfolio and AEP signed an agreement to sell the competitive contracted renewables portfolio to a nonaffiliated party for $1.5 billion including the assumption of project debt. AEP recorded a pretax loss of $112 million ($88 million after-tax) in the first quarter of 2023 as a result of reaching Held for Sale status. Management concluded the impact of any other than temporary decline in the fair value of the four joint venture wind farms was not material.

AEP expects to close on the sale in the third quarter of 2023, pending approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. AEP expects to receive cash proceeds, net of taxes, transaction fees and other customary closing adjustments, of approximately $1.2 billion. See the "Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale" section of Note 6 for additional information.

Planned Sale of AEP Energy and AEP Onsite Partners

Management has continued a strategic evaluation of the business with a focus on core regulated utility operations, risk mitigation and simplification. As a result of these efforts, the following decisions have recently been made with respect to AEP Energy and AEP Onsite Partners.

AEP Energy

In October 2022, AEP initiated a strategic evaluation for its ownership in AEP Energy, a wholly-owned retail energy supplier that supplies electricity and/or natural gas on a price risk managed basis to residential, commercial and industrial customers. AEP Energy provides various energy solutions in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio and Washington, D.C. AEP Energy had approximately 844,000 customer accounts as of June 30, 2023. In April 2023, management completed the strategic evaluation of AEP Energy and initiated a sale process. The timing of the completion of the sales process is dependent upon a number of factors. AEP is currently targeting the sales process to be completed in the first half of 2024. Depending on the outcome of the sales process, it could reduce future net income and impact financial condition.

AEP Onsite Partners

In April 2023, AEP also made a decision to include AEP Onsite Partners in a sale process. AEP OnSite Partners targets opportunities in distributed solar, combined heat and power, energy storage, waste heat recovery, energy efficiency, peaking generation and other energy solutions. As of June 30, 2023, AEP OnSite Partners owned projects located in 22 states, including approximately 168 MWs of installed solar capacity, and approximately 27 MWs of solar projects under construction. As of June 30, 2023, the net book value of these assets was $354
3


million. The timing of the completion of the sales process is dependent upon a number of factors. AEP is currently targeting the sales process to be completed in the first half of 2024.

AEP Onsite Partners also owns a 50% interest in NM Renewable Development, LLC, (NMRD) totaling $106 million accounted for as an equity method investment. The NMRD portfolio consists of 8 operating solar projects totaling 135 MWs, one 50 MW project under construction and 6 projects totaling 440 MWs in development. Separate from the remainder of AEP Onsite Partners, AEP and the joint owner have agreed to initiate a joint sales process for their respective interests in NMRD. The timing of the completion of the sales process is dependent upon a number of factors. AEP is currently targeting the sales process to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2023.

If AEP is unable to recover the net book value or carrying value of these assets as part of the sale process, it could reduce future net income and impact financial condition.

Planned Sale and Strategic Evaluation of Certain Transmission Joint Ventures

In April 2023, AEP also initiated a strategic evaluation for its ownership in certain transmission joint ventures in the AEP Transmission HoldCo segment including Pioneer Transmission, LLC, Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC and Transource Energy. In July 2023, AEP made a decision to initiate a sales process for its investment in Pioneer Transmission, LLC and Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC. As of June 30, 2023, AEP’s investment in Pioneer Transmission, LLC, and Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC was $46 million and $19 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2023, the net book value of Transource Energy was $278 million inclusive of $38 million related to noncontrolling interest on AEP’s balance sheet. Potential alternatives may include continued ownership or a sale. Management has not made a decision regarding the potential alternatives, but expects to complete the strategic evaluation by the end of 2023.

Federal Tax Legislation

In August 2022, President Biden signed H.R. 5376 into law, commonly known as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 or IRA.

In June 2023, the IRS issued temporary regulations related to the transfer of tax credits. AEP and subsidiaries have qualifying tax credits that are eligible to be transferred and, depending on market conditions, will consider selling qualifying tax credits in the second half of 2023. See Note 11 - Income Taxes for additional information.

Regulatory Matters

AEP’s public utility subsidiaries are involved in rate and regulatory proceedings at the FERC and their state commissions.  Depending on the outcomes, these rate and regulatory proceedings can have a material impact on results of operations, cash flows and possibly financial condition. AEP is currently involved in the following key proceedings. See Note 4 - Rate Matters for additional information.

2012 Texas Base Rate Case - In 2012, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT to increase annual base rates primarily due to the completion of the Turk Plant. In 2013, the PUCT issued an order affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant but determined that the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap established in a previous Certificate of Convenience and Necessity case also limited SWEPCo’s recovery of AFUDC in addition to limits on its recovery of cash construction costs. Upon rehearing in 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap. In 2017, the Texas District Court upheld the PUCT’s 2014 order and intervenors filed appeals with the Texas Third Court of Appeals. In July 2018, the Texas Third Court of Appeals reversed the PUCT’s judgment affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant and remanded the issue back to the PUCT. In January 2019, SWEPCo and the PUCT filed petitions for review with the Texas Supreme Court.


4


In March 2021, the Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion reversing the July 2018 judgment of the Texas Third Court of Appeals and agreeing with the PUCT’s judgment affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant. In addition, the Texas Supreme Court remanded the AFUDC dispute back to the Texas Third Court of Appeals. No parties filed a motion for rehearing with the Texas Supreme Court. In August 2021, the Texas Third Court of Appeals reversed the Texas District Court judgment affirming the PUCT’s order on AFUDC, concluding that the language of the PUCT’s original 2008 order intended to include AFUDC in the Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap, and remanded the case to the PUCT for future proceedings. SWEPCo disagrees with the Court of Appeals decision. SWEPCo and the PUCT submitted Petitions for Review with the Texas Supreme Court in November 2021. In October 2022, the Texas Supreme Court denied the Petitions for Review submitted by SWEPCo and the PUCT. In December 2022, SWEPCo and the PUCT filed requests for rehearing with the Texas Supreme Court. In June 2023, the Texas Supreme Court denied SWEPCo’s request for rehearing and the case was remanded to the PUCT for future proceedings.

Management does not believe a disallowance of capitalized Turk Plant costs or a revenue refund is probable as of June 30, 2023. However, if SWEPCo is ultimately unable to recover AFUDC in excess of the Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap it would be expected to result in a pretax net disallowance ranging from $80 million to $90 million. In addition, if SWEPCo is ultimately unable to recover AFUDC in excess of the Texas jurisdictional cost cap, SWEPCo estimates it may be required to make customer refunds ranging from $0 to $195 million related to revenues collected from February 2013 through June 2023 and such determination may reduce SWEPCo’s future revenues by approximately $15 million on an annual basis.

In July 2019, Ohio House Bill 6 (HB 6), which offered incentives for power-generating facilities with zero or reduced carbon emissions, was signed into law by the Ohio Governor. HB 6 terminated energy efficiency programs as of December 31, 2020, including OPCo’s shared savings revenues of $26 million annually and phased out renewable mandates after 2026. HB 6 also provided for continued recovery of existing renewable energy contracts on a bypassable basis through 2032 and included a provision for continued recovery of OVEC costs through 2030 which is allocated to all electric distribution utility customers in Ohio on a non-bypassable basis. OPCo’s Inter-Company Power Agreement for OVEC terminates in June 2040. In July 2020, an investigation led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office resulted in a federal grand jury indictment of the Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives, Larry Householder, four other individuals, and Generation Now, an entity registered as a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, in connection with an alleged racketeering conspiracy involving the adoption of HB 6. Certain defendants in that case had previously plead guilty and, in March 2023, a federal jury convicted Larry Householder and another individual of participating in the racketeering conspiracy. In 2021, four AEP shareholders filed derivative actions purporting to assert claims on behalf of AEP against certain AEP officers and directors. See “Litigation Related to Ohio House Bill 6” section of Litigation below for additional information.

In March 2021, the Governor of Ohio signed legislation that, among other things, repealed the payments to the nonaffiliated owner of Ohio’s nuclear power plants that were previously authorized under HB 6. The new legislation, House Bill 128, went into effect in May 2021 and leaves unchanged other provisions of HB 6 regarding energy efficiency programs, recovery of renewable energy costs and recovery of OVEC costs. To the extent that the law changes or OPCo is unable to recover the costs of renewable energy contracts on a bypassable basis by the end of 2032, recover costs of OVEC after 2030 or incurs significant costs associated with the derivative actions, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

In March 2023 and May 2023, certain joint customers submitted a complaint and a formal challenge at the FERC related to the 2022 Annual Update of the 2021 Transmission Formula Rates of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries within PJM and SPP, respectively. These challenges primarily relate to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs in the transmission formula rates of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries. AEPSC, on behalf of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries within PJM and SPP, filed answers to the joint formal challenge and complaint with the FERC in the second quarter of 2023.
5


The Registrants transitioned to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs in its PJM and SPP transmission formula rates beginning with the 2022 projected transmission revenue requirements and 2021 true-up to actual transmission revenue requirements, and provided notice of this change in informational filings made with the FERC. Stand-alone treatment of NOLCs for transmission formula rates increased the annual revenue requirements for years 2023, 2022, and 2021 by $60 million, $69 million and $78 million, respectively. Through the second quarter of 2023, the Registrants’ financial statements reflect a provision for refund for certain NOLC revenues billed by PJM and SPP. Also, a certain portion of the impact of inclusion of NOLCs in the 2021 annual formula rate true-up not yet billed by PJM and SPP is not reflected in the Registrants’ revenues and expenses as the Registrants have not met the requirements of alternative revenue recognition in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations”. If the Registrants are required to make refunds as a result of these challenges, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

The Registrants are also transitioning to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs in retail jurisdiction base rate case filings. As a result of retail jurisdiction base rate cases in Arkansas, Indiana, Oklahoma and Texas, inclusion of NOLCs in rates in those jurisdictions is contingent upon a supportive private letter ruling from the IRS. If the Registrants are successful in transitioning to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs, it could have a material, favorable impact on future net income.

Securitization Legislation - In March 2023, Kentucky (Senate Bill 192) and West Virginia (House Bill 3308) both passed legislation that would allow the securitization of certain plant assets. Eligible costs to be securitized in Kentucky include certain retired generation costs with a minimum value of $200 million as well as certain other regulatory assets, including deferred extraordinary storm costs, as long as the cumulative total requested for securitization is at least $275 million. Eligible costs to be securitized in West Virginia include historical, and if deemed appropriate by the commission, projected costs relating to environmental control costs, expanded net energy costs, storm recovery costs and undepreciated generation utility plant balances.

In April 2023, APCo and WPCo submitted their 2023 annual ENEC filing with the WVPSC proposing two alternatives to increase ENEC rates effective September 1, 2023. One of the alternatives included an option to securitize approximately $1.9 billion of assets. In June 2023, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC requesting to finance, through the issuance of securitization bonds, approximately $471 million of regulatory assets. See Note 4 - Rate Matters for additional information.

In April 2023, the Virginia General Assembly approved the Governor’s proposed changes to House Bill 1777, modifying APCo’s earnings review and base rate process, with a biennial earnings review replacing APCo’s current triennial earnings review. APCo will submit its first biennial review filing in 2024 using only a 2023 test year. Also included in this approved legislation is the option for APCo to securitize deferred fuel costs.

Texas Legislation - In May 2023, legislation (Senate Bill 1016) was passed in Texas allowing certain financially based employee incentive compensation to be recovered. As a result of this law change, in the second quarter of 2023 AEP Texas and SWEPCo recognized a favorable impact to pretax income of approximately $27 million and $6 million, respectively.


6


Utility Rates and Rate Proceedings

The Registrants file rate cases with their regulatory commissions in order to establish fair and appropriate electric service rates to recover their costs and earn a fair return on their investments. The outcomes of these regulatory proceedings impact the Registrants’ current and future results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

The following tables show the Registrants’ completed and pending base rate case proceedings in 2023. See Note 4 - Rate Matters for additional information.

Completed Base Rate Case Proceedings

Approved RevenueApprovedNew Rates
CompanyJurisdictionRequirement IncreaseROEEffective
(in millions)
SWEPCoLouisiana$21.0 (a)9.5%February 2023

(a)See “2020 Louisiana Base Rate Case” section of Note 4 in the 2022 Annual Report for additional information.



Pending Base Rate Case Proceedings
Commission Staff/
FilingRequested RevenueRequestedIntervenor Range of
CompanyJurisdictionDateRequirement IncreaseROERecommended ROE
(in millions)
PSOOklahomaNovember 2022$173.0 (a)10.4%8.6%-9.5%
APCoVirginiaMarch 2023213.0 10.6%9.2%(b)
KPCoKentuckyJune 202394.0 9.9%(c)
(a)Requested revenue requirement increase, net of existing rider revenues and certain incremental renewable facility benefits expected to be provided to customers through riders.
(b)Represents intervenor testimony. Virginia staff testimony is due in the third quarter of 2023.
(c)Intervenor testimony due in the fourth quarter of 2023.


7


Deferred Fuel Costs

Increased fuel and purchased power prices in excess of amounts included in fuel-related revenues has led to an increase in the under collection of fuel costs from customers in most jurisdictions. The table below illustrates the increase (decrease) in the deferred fuel regulatory assets by company and jurisdiction, excluding the impacts of the February 2021 severe winter weather event. See the “February 2021 Severe Winter Weather Impacts in SPP” section in Note 4 for additional information. If any of these deferred fuel costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Traditional FACAs ofAs ofIncrease/
CompanyJurisdictionRecovery ResetJune 30, 2023December 31, 2022(Decrease)
(in millions)
APCoVirginia (a)Annually$333.5 $407.9 $(74.4)
APCoWest VirginiaAnnually308.5 288.5 20.0 
I&MIndianaBi-Annually5.4 38.1 (32.7)
I&MMichiganAnnually12.1 9.0 3.1 
PSOOklahoma (b)Annually285.1 431.5 (146.4)
SWEPCoArkansasAnnually36.8 65.8 (29.0)
SWEPCoTexas (c)Tri-Annually158.7 191.4 (32.7)
KPCoKentuckyMonthly4.0 23.2 (19.2)
WPCoWest VirginiaAnnually256.6 231.1 25.5 
Total$1,400.7 $1,686.5 $(285.8)

(a)Includes $56 million and $223 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, of noncurrent deferred fuel classified as a Regulatory Asset on APCo’s balance sheets.
(b)Includes $106 million and $253 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, of noncurrent deferred fuel classified as a Regulatory Asset on PSO’s balance sheets.
(c)Includes $76 million and $0 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, of noncurrent deferred fuel classified as a Regulatory Asset on SWEPCo’s balance sheets.

The AEP utility subsidiaries are working with various state commissions on the timing of recovering deferred fuel balances and have made the following recent filings:

In April 2022, APCo and WPCo (the Companies) submitted their 2022 annual ENEC filing with the WVPSC requesting a $297 million annual increase in ENEC revenues, effective September 1, 2022. In February 2023, the WVPSC issued an order stating that the commission will not grant additional rate increases for fuel costs until the WVPSC staff completes its prudency review. In April 2023, the Companies submitted their 2023 annual ENEC filing with the WVPSC, proposing two alternatives to increase ENEC rates effective September 1, 2023. The first alternative is a $293 million annual increase in ENEC rates comprised of a $89 million increase for current year ENEC expense and a $200 million annual increase for the recovery of the Companies’ February 28, 2023 ENEC under-recovery balances over three years, including debt and equity carrying costs. The second alternative is an $89 million annual increase in ENEC rates with the Companies securitizing approximately $1.9 billion of assets, including $553 million relating to ENEC under-recoveries as of February 28, 2023. Additionally, in April 2023, the Staff submitted the prudency review prepared by an independent consultant retained by the WVPSC staff regarding the Companies’ operation of the Amos, Mountaineer and Mitchell coal plants that Staff was directed to conduct by the WVPSC in May 2022 (Consultant’s Report). Adoption of the Consultant’s Report’s findings by the WVPSC could result in a disallowance of up to $285 million. The Companies disagree with the conclusions and recommendations contained in the Consultant’s Report and intend to dispute them in the appropriate proceedings before the WVPSC. See “ENEC Filings” section of Note 4 for additional information.
8


In September 2022, the Director of the Public Utility Division of the OCC approved a Fuel Cost Adjustment rate designed to collect a $402 million deferred fuel balance over a 27-month period, effective with the first billing cycle of October 2022. PSO’s fuel and purchased power expenses are subject to an annual prudency review by the OCC.

In October 2022, APCo submitted its annual Virginia fuel factor filing with interim FAC rates effective November 2022.  To help mitigate the impact of rising fuel costs on customer bills, APCo proposed recovery of its deferred fuel balance as of October 31, 2022 over two years.  In March 2023, the Virginia SCC issued an order approving APCo’s request to increase its annual fuel factor by approximately $279 million and APCo’s request to recover its October 31, 2022 deferred fuel balance over two years.  As ordered by the Virginia SCC, APCo’s historical period fuel and purchased power expenses for the years 2019 through 2022 are currently subject to a fuel audit/prudency review. Virginia staff will include the results of this audit in APCo’s next annual Virginia fuel factor filing that will be submitted in the fourth quarter of 2023.

In April 2023, the PUCT issued an order approving an interim fuel surcharge, effective February 2023, allowing SWEPCo to recover $83 million of non Sabine and Oxbow mine related fuel costs through June 2024. In June 2023, an unopposed settlement agreement was filed with the PUCT that would allow SWEPCo to recover $81 million of Sabine and Oxbow mine related fuel costs through 2035. A decision from the PUCT on the unopposed settlement agreement is expected in the fourth quarter of 2023. See “Dolet Hills Power Station and Related Fuel Operations” and “Pirkey Plant and Related Fuel Operations” sections in Note 4 for additional information related to the recovery of fuel costs in SWEPCo’s Arkansas and Louisiana jurisdictions.

Renewable Generation Portfolio


The growth of AEP’s regulated renewable generation portfolio reflects the company’s strategy to diversify generation resources to provide clean energy options to customers that meet both their energy and capacity needs.


ContractedApproved Renewable Generation FacilitiesFilings


AEP utilizes two subsidiaries within the Generation & Marketing segmentThe Registrants have received regulatory approvals from various state regulatory commissions to further develop its renewable portfolio.  AEP OnSite Partners, LLC works directly with wholesale and large retail customers to provide tailored solutions based upon market knowledge, technology innovations and deal structuring which may include distributed solar, wind, combined heat and power, energy storage, waste heat recovery, energy efficiency, peaking generation and other forms


of cost reducing energy technologies.  AEP OnSite Partners, LLC pursues projects where a suitable termed agreement is entered into with a creditworthy counterparty.  AEP Renewables, LLC develops and/or acquires large scale renewable generation projects that are backed with long-term contracts with creditworthy counterparties. As of September 30, 2017, these subsidiaries haveacquire approximately 1482,204 MWs of owned renewable generation projects in operation and $292 million of capital costs have been incurred related to these projects. In addition, as of September 30, 2017, these subsidiaries have approximately 42 MWs of renewable generation projects under construction and estimated capital costs of $54 million related to these projects. As of September 30, 2017, total estimated capital costs related to these renewable generation projects were approximately $346 million.

Regulated Renewable Generation Facilities

In July 2017, APCo submitted filings with the Virginia SCC and the WVPSC requesting regulatory approval to acquire two wind generation facilities, totaling approximately 225 MW$5.2 billion, in addition to 73 MWs of wind generation. The wind generating facilities are located in West Virginia and Ohio and, if approved, are anticipated to be in-servicerenewable purchase power agreements, as included in the second half of 2019. APCo will assume ownership offollowing table:

CompanyGeneration TypeExpected Commercial OperationOwned/PPAGenerating Capacity
(in MWs)
APCoSolarQ3 2023Owned
APCoWindQ3 2025Owned204 
PSOSolarQ2 2025 through Q4 2025Owned443 
PSOWindQ2 2025 through Q4 2025Owned553 
SWEPCo (a)SolarQ2 2025 through Q4 2025Owned/PPA273 
SWEPCo (a)WindQ4 2024 through Q4 2025Owned799 
Total Approved Renewable Projects2,277 

(a)Includes approvals by the facilities at or near the anticipated in-service date. APCo currently plans to sell the Renewable Energy Certificates associated with the generation from these facilities.

In July 2017, PSO and SWEPCo submitted filingswith the OCC, LPSC, APSC and PUCT requesting various regulatory approvals needed to fully proceed with the Wind Catcher Project. The Wind Catcher Project includes the acquisitionLPSC for 999 MWs of a wind generation facility, totaling approximately 2,000 MW of wind generation, and the construction of a generation interconnection tie-line totaling approximately 350 miles. Total investment for the project is estimated to be $4.5 billion and will serve both retail and FERC wholesale load. PSO and SWEPCo will have a 30% and 70% ownership share, respectively, in these assets. The wind generating facility is located in Oklahoma and, if approved by all state commissions, is anticipated to be in-service by the end of 2020. In July 2017,owned projects. Additionally, the LPSC approved SWEPCo’s request for an exemptionthe flex-up option, allowing SWEPCo to recover the Market Based Mechanism. In August 2017,portion of the Oklahoma Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss with the OCC. In August 2017, the motion to dismiss wasprojects denied by the OCC. Hearings atPUCT.


9


Renewable Generation Filings Pending Regulatory Approval

Recently, the APSC, LPSC, OCC and PUCT are scheduledRegistrants have made filings with various state regulatory commissions seeking approval to acquire 612 MWs of owned renewable generation facilities, in addition to 484 MWs of renewable purchased power agreements, as included in the first quarterfollowing table:

CompanyGeneration TypeExpected Commercial OperationOwned/PPAGenerating Capacity
(in MWs)
APCoSolarQ2 2024 through Q1 2026PPA204 
APCoWindQ4 2025Owned143 
I&MSolarQ4 2025 through Q2 2026Owned/PPA749 
Total Renewable Projects Pending Regulatory Approval1,096 

Significant Renewable Generation Requests for Proposal (RFP)

As part of 2018.AEP’s transition to diversify the company’s regulated generation resources and build its renewable generation portfolio, the Registrants issue RFPs to identify potential renewable projects. The table below includes RFPs recently issued for owned generation and purchased power generation. These projects would be subject to regulatory approval.


Hurricane Harvey
CompanyIssuance DateProjected
In-Service Dates
Generation TypeGenerating Capacity
(in MWs)
I&MMarch 2023Year End 2027Wind (a)800 
I&MMarch 2023Year End 2027Solar (a)(b)850 
APCoApril 2023Year End 2026Wind and/or Solar (c)(d)800 
Total Significant RFPs2,450 


In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey hit the coast(a)RFP is an all-source solicitation seeking proposals for both owned projects and PPAs from various types of Texas, causing power outages in the AEP Texas service territory. As restoration efforts are ongoing, AEP Texas’ total costs relatedgeneration including 315 MWs of storage and 540 MWs of natural gas. Includes an option for battery storage.
(b)Includes consideration for 300 MWs of solar paired with up to this storm are not yet known. AEP Texas’ current estimated cost is approximately $250 million60 MWs of battery storage.
(c)Includes RFP for up to $300 million, including capitalized expenditures. AEP Texas currently estimates that it will incur approximately $90 million200 MWs of operation and maintenance costs related to service restoration efforts. AEP Texas has a PUCT approved catastrophe reserve in base rates and can defer incremental storm expenses. AEP Texas currently recovers approximately $1 million of storm costs annually through base rates. As of September 30, 2017, the total balance of AEP Texas’ deferred storm costs is approximately $97 million including approximately $73 million of incremental storm expenses as a regulatory asset related to Hurricane Harvey. Management is currently in the early stages of analyzing the impact of potential insurance claims and recoveries and, at this time, cannot estimate this amount. Any future insurance recoveries received will be applied to and will offset the regulatory asset and property, plant and equipment, as applicable. AEP Texas is currently evaluating recovery optionsPPAs.
(d)Includes an option for the regulatory asset; however, management believes the asset is probable of recovery. The other named hurricanes did not have a material impact on AEP’s operations in the third quarter of 2017. If the ultimate costs of the incident are not recovered by insurance or through the regulatory process, it could have an adverse effect on future net income, cash flows and financial condition.battery storage.


Merchant Portion of Turk Plant


SWEPCo constructed the Turk Plant, a base load 600 MW (650 MW net maximum capacity) pulverized coal ultra-supercritical generating unit in Arkansas, which was placed into servicein-service in December 2012 and is included in the Vertically Integrated Utilities segment. SWEPCo owns 73% (440 MWs/477 MWs) of the Turk Plant and operates the facility.


The APSC granted approval for SWEPCo to build the Turk Plant by issuing a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need (CECPN) for the SWEPCo Arkansas jurisdictional share of the Turk Plant (approximatelyApproximately 20%).


Following an appeal by certain intervenors, the Arkansas Supreme Court issued a decision that reversed the APSC’s grant of the CECPN. In June 2010, in response to an Arkansas Supreme Court decision, the APSC issued an order which reversed and set aside the previously granted CECPN. This share of the Turk Plant output is currently not subject to cost-based rate recovery andin Arkansas. This portion of the plant’s output is being sold into the wholesale market. Approximately 80% of the Turk Plant investment is recovered under retail cost-based rate recovery in Texas, Louisiana (subject to prudence review) and through SWEPCo’s wholesale customers under FERC-basedFERC-approved rates. In November 2022, SWEPCo filed a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity with the APSC for approval to operate the Turk plant to serve Arkansas customers and recover the associated costs through a cost recovery rider. Cost-based recovery of the Turk Plant would aid SWEPCo’s near-term capacity needs and support compliance with SPP’s 2023 increased capacity planning reserve margin requirements. In April 2023, intervenors filed testimony recommending the APSC deny the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity on the basis that the Turk Plant is not the least cost alternative.
10


In June 2023, SWEPCo filed rebuttal testimony with the APSC. In July 2023, additional intervenor testimony was filed with the APSC by the Attorney General of Arkansas and the APSC staff with recommendations consistent with the previously filed April 2023 intervenor testimony. A hearing is scheduled for the third quarter of 2023. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the net book value of the Turk Plant was $1.5$1.4 billion, before cost of removal including materialsCWIP and supplies inventory and CWIP. In October 2017, the LPSC staff filed a prudence review of the Turk Plant. See “Louisiana Turk Plant Prudence Review” section of Note 4.

inventory. If SWEPCo cannot ultimately recover its investment and expenses related to the Arkansas retail portion of the Turk Plant, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

11
June 2015 - May 2018 ESP Including PPA Application and Proposed ESP Extension through 2024



In March 2016, a contested stipulation agreement related to the PPA rider application was modified and approved by the PUCO. The approved PPA rider is subject to audit and review by the PUCO. Consistent with the terms of a modified and approved stipulation agreement, and based upon a September 2016 PUCO order, in November 2016, OPCo refiled its amended ESP extension application and supporting testimony. The amended filing proposed to extend the ESP through May 2024 and included (a) an extension of the OVEC PPA rider, (b) a proposed 10.41% return on common equity on capital costs for certain riders, (c) the continuation of riders previously approved in the June 2015 - May 2018 ESP, (d) proposed increases in rate caps related to OPCo’s DIR and (e) the addition of various new riders, including a Renewable Resource Rider.

In August 2017, OPCo and various intervenors filed a stipulation agreement with the PUCO. The stipulation extends the term of the ESP through May 2024 and includes: (a) an extension of the OVEC PPA rider, (b) a proposed 10% return on common equity on capital costs for certain riders, (c) the continuation of riders previously approved in the June 2015 - May 2018 ESP, (d) rate caps related to OPCo’s DIR ranging from $215 million to $290 million for the periods 2018 through 2021, (e) the addition of various new riders, including a Smart City Rider and a Renewable Generation Rider, (f) a decrease in annual depreciation rates based on a depreciation study using data through December 2015 and (g) amortization of approximately $24 million annually beginning January 2018 of OPCo’s excess distribution accumulated depreciation reserve, which was $239 million as of December 31, 2015. Upon PUCO approval of the stipulation, effective January 2018, OPCo will cease recording $39 million in annual amortization previously approved to end in December 2018 in accordance with PUCO’s December 2011 OPCo distribution base rate case order. In the stipulation, OPCo and intervenors agree that OPCo can request in future proceedings a change in meter depreciation rates due to retired meters pursuant to the smart grid Phase 2 project. DIR rate caps will be reset in OPCo’s next distribution base rate case which must be filed by June 2020.

In October 2017, intervenor testimony opposing the stipulation agreement was filed recommending: (a) a return on common equity to not exceed 9.3% for riders earning a return on capital investments, (b) that OPCo should file a base distribution case concurrent with the conclusion of the current ESP in May 2018 and (c) denial of certain new riders proposed in OPCo’s ESP extension. The stipulation is subject to review by the PUCO. A hearing at the PUCO is scheduled for November 2017.

If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings” section of Note 4.

2016 SEET Filing

In December 2016, OPCo recorded a 2016 SEET provision of $58 million based upon projected earnings data for companies in the comparable utilities risk group. In determining OPCo’s return on equity in relation to the comparable utilities risk group, management excluded the following items resolved in OPCo’s Global Settlement: (a) gain on the deferral of RSR costs, (b) refunds to customers related to the SEET remands and (c) refunds to customers related to fuel adjustment clause proceedings. In May 2017, OPCo submitted its 2016 SEET filing with the PUCO in which


management indicated that OPCo did not have significantly excessive earnings in 2016 based upon actual earnings data for the comparable utilities risk group. Although management believes that OPCo’s adjusted 2016 earnings were not excessive, management did not adjust OPCo’s 2016 SEET provision due to risks that the PUCO could rule against OPCo’s SEET treatment of the Global Settlement issues described above or adopt a different 2016 SEET threshold. If the PUCO orders a refund of 2016 OPCo earnings, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “2016 SEET Filing” section of Note 4.

Rockport Plant, Unit 2 Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)

In October 2016, I&M filed an application with the IURC for approval of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) to install SCR technology at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 by December 2019. The equipment will allow I&M to reduce emissions of NOx from Rockport Plant, Unit 2 in order for I&M to continue to operate that unit under current environmental requirements. The estimated cost of the SCR project is $274 million, excluding AFUDC, to be shared equally between I&M and AEGCo.  As of September 30, 2017, total costs incurred related to this project, including AFUDC, were approximately $17 million.  The filing included a request for authorization for I&M to defer its Indiana jurisdictional ownership share of costs including investment carrying costs at a weighted average cost of capital (WACC), depreciation over a 10-year period as provided by statute and other related expenses. I&M proposed recovery of these costs using the existing Clean Coal Technology Rider in a future filing subsequent to approval of the SCR project. The AEGCo ownership share of the proposed SCR project will be billable under the Rockport Unit Power Agreement to I&M and KPCo and will be subject to future regulatory approval for recovery. In February 2017, the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and other parties filed testimony with the IURC. The OUCC recommended approval of the CPCN but also stated that any decision regarding recovery of any under-depreciated plant due to retirement should be fully investigated in a base rate case, not in a tracker or other abbreviated proceeding. The other parties recommended either denial of the CPCN or approval of the CPCN with conditions including a cap on the amount of SCR costs allowed to be recovered in the rider and limitations on other costs related to legal issues involving the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease. A hearing at the IURC was held in March 2017. An order from the IURC is pending. In July 2017, I&M filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to remove the requirement to install SCR technology at Rockport Plant, Unit 2. In August 2017, the district court delayed the deadline for installation of the SCR technology until March 2020.

2017 Indiana Base Rate Case

In July 2017, I&M filed a request with the IURC for a $263 million annual increase in Indiana rates based upon a proposed 10.6% return on common equity with the annual increase to be implemented after June 2018. Upon implementation, this proposed annual increase would be subject to a temporary offsetting $23 million annual reduction to customer bills through December 2018 for a credit adjustment rider related to the timing of estimated in-service dates of certain capital expenditures.  The proposed annual increase includes $78 million related to increased annual depreciation rates and an $11 million increase related to the amortization of certain Cook Plant and Rockport Plant regulatory assets. The increase in depreciation rates includes a change in the expected retirement date for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 from 2044 to 2028 combined with increased investment at the Cook Plant, including the Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project. A hearing at the IURC is scheduled for January 2018. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2017 Michigan Base Rate Case

In May 2017, I&M filed a request with the MPSC for a $52 million annual increase in Michigan base rates based upon a proposed 10.6% return on common equity with the increase to be implemented no later than April 2018. The proposed annual increase includes $23 million related to increased annual depreciation rates and a $4 million increase related to the amortization of certain Cook Plant regulatory assets. The increase in depreciation rates is primarily due to the proposed change in the expected retirement date for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 from 2044 to 2028 combined with increased investment at the Cook Plant related to the Life Cycle Management Project. Additionally, the total proposed increase includes incremental costs related to the Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Program and increased vegetation management expenses. In October 2017, the MPSC staff and intervenors filed testimony.  The MPSC staff recommended an annual net revenue increase of $49 million including proposed retirement dates of 2028 for both Rockport Plant, Units 1 (from 2044) and 2 (from 2022) and a return on common equity of 9.8%. The intervenors


proposed certain adjustments to I&M’s request including no change to the current 2044 retirement date of Rockport Plant, Unit 1, but did not propose an annual net revenue increase. Their recommended return on common equity ranged from 9.3% to 9.5%. A hearing at the MPSC is scheduled for November 2017. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Louisiana Turk Plant Prudence Review

Beginning January 2013, SWEPCo’s formula rates, including the Louisiana jurisdictional share (approximately 33%) of the Turk Plant, have been collected subject to refund pending the outcome of a prudence review of the Turk Plant investment, which was placed into service in December 2012. In October 2017, the LPSC staff filed testimony contending that SWEPCo failed to continue to evaluate the suspension or cancellation of the Turk Plant during its construction period. The testimony also identified five individual items totaling approximately $51 million for potential disallowance relating to Louisiana’s jurisdictional share of Turk Plant. As a result of SWEPCo’s alleged failure to meet its continuing prudence obligations, the LPSC staff recommends one of the following potential unfavorable scenarios: (a) 50/50 sharing of construction cost overruns between SWEPCo and ratepayers, (b) an imposition of a cost cap similar to Texas or (c) approximately a 1% reduction of the rate on common equity for the Turk Plant. As SWEPCo has included the full value of the Turk Plant in rate base since its in-service date, SWEPCo may be required to refund potential over-collections from January 2013 through the date new rates are implemented. As of September 30, 2017, if the LPSC adopts one of these potential scenarios, and disallows the five individual items, pretax write-offs could range from $50 million to $80 million and refund provisions, including interest, could range from $15 million to $27 million. Future annual revenue reductions could range from $3 million to $4 million. Management will continue to vigorously defend against these claims. If the LPSC orders in favor of one of these scenarios, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. A hearing at the LPSC is scheduled for December 2017.

2017 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In June 2017, PSO filed an application for a base rate review with the OCC that requested a net increase in annual revenues of $156 million based upon a proposed 10% return on common equity. The proposed base rate increase includes (a) environmental compliance investments, including recovery of previously deferred environmental compliance related costs currently recorded as regulatory assets, (b) Advanced Metering Infrastructure investments, (c) additional capital investments and costs to serve PSO’s customers, and (d) an annual $42 million depreciation rate increase due primarily to shorter service lives and lower net salvage estimates. As part of this filing, consistent with the OCC’s final order in its previous base rate case, PSO requested recovery through 2040 of Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, including the environmental control investment, and the net book value of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 that was retired in 2016. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 was $82 million.

In September 2017, various intervenors and the OCC staff filed testimony that included annual net revenue increase recommendations ranging from $28 million to $108 million. The recommended returns on common equity ranged from 8% to 9%. In addition, certain parties recommended investment disallowances that ranged from $27 million to $82 million related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 and $38 million associated with capitalized incentives. Also, a party recommended a potential refund of $43 million related to an SPP rider claiming that PSO did not adequately support the related SPP costs. The combined total impact could result in a write-off and refund of up to approximately $163 million. In addition, if similar plant recovery issues would apply to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, the net book value of plant, including regulatory assets, materials and supplies inventory and CWIP of $346 million as of September 30, 2017, could be adversely impacted. A hearing at the OCC is scheduled to begin in October 2017.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2017 Kentucky Base Rate Case

In June 2017, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC for a $66 million annual increase in Kentucky base rates based upon a proposed 10.31% return on common equity with the increase to be implemented no later than January 2018. The proposed increase includes: (a) lost load since KPCo last changed base rates in July 2015, (b) incremental costs


related to OATT charges from PJM not currently recovered from retail ratepayers, (c) increased depreciation expense including updated Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 depreciation rates using a proposed retirement date of 2031, (d) recovery of other Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 generation costs currently recovered through a retail rider and (e) incremental purchased power costs. Additionally, KPCo requested a $4 million annual increase in environmental surcharge revenues.

In August 2017, KPCo submitted a supplemental filing with the KPSC that decreased the proposed annual base rate revenue request to $60 million. The modification was due to a lower interest expense related to June 2017 debt refinancings. In October 2017, various intervenors filed testimony that included annual net revenue increase recommendations ranging from $13 million to $40 million. Intervenors recommended returns on common equity ranging from 8.6% to 8.85%. Intervenors also recommended significant delays in KPCo’s proposed recoveries of: (a) depreciation expense related to Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 (gas unit), proposing a 30-year depreciable life instead of KPCo’s proposed 15-year life and (b) lease expense on Rockport Plant, Unit 2 billed from AEGCo, proposing that the approximate $100 million of lease expense for the period 2018 through 2022 be deferred with a WACC carrying charge for recovery over 10 years beginning 2023. Testimony on behalf of the Attorney General also discussed that the KPSC could consider disallowing all or a portion of the costs currently being recovered over 25 years through the Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 retirement rider.  As of September 30, 2017, KPCo’s regulatory asset related to the retired Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 was $289 million. A hearing at the KPSC is scheduled for December 2017.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

2016 Texas Base Rate Case

In December 2016, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT for a net increase in Texas annual revenues of $69 million based upon a 10% return on common equity. In September 2017, the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) issued their proposal for decision including an annual net revenue increase of $50 million including recovery of Welsh Plant, Unit 2 environmental investments as of June 30, 2016. The ALJs proposed a return on common equity of 9.6% and recovery of but no return on Welsh Plant, Unit 2. The ALJs rejected SWEPCo’s proposed transmission cost recovery mechanism. The estimated potential write-off associated with the ALJs proposal is approximately $22 million which includes $9 millionassociated with the lack of a return on Welsh Plant, Unit 2.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, including environmental investments and retirement-related costs for Welsh Plant, Unit 2, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “2016 Texas Base Rate Case” section of Note 4.

FERC Transmission Complaint - AEP’s PJM Participants

In October 2016, several parties filed a joint complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by AEP’s eastern transmission subsidiaries in calculating formula transmission rates under the PJM OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.99% to 8.32%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Modifications to AEP’s PJM Transmission Rates

In November 2016, AEP’s eastern transmission subsidiaries filed an application at the FERC to modify the PJM OATT formula transmission rate calculation, including an adjustment to recover a tax-related regulatory asset and a shift from historical to projected expenses. In March 2017, the FERC accepted the proposed modifications effective January 1, 2017, subject to refund, and set this matter for hearing and settlement procedures. Effective January 1, 2017, the modified PJM OATT formula rates were implemented, subject to refund, based on projected 2017 calendar year financial activity and projected plant balances. If the FERC determines that any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


FERC Transmission Complaint - AEP’s SPP Participants

In June 2017, several parties filed a joint complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by AEP’s western transmission subsidiaries in calculating formula transmission rates under the SPP OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.7% to 8.36%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

FERC SWEPCo Power Supply Agreements Complaint - East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. (ETEC) and Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NTEC)

In September 2017, ETEC and NTEC filed a complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by SWEPCo in calculating their power supply formula rates is excessive and should be reduced from 11.1% to 8.41%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Welsh Plant - Environmental Impact

Management currently estimates that the investment necessary to meet proposed environmental regulations through 2025 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 could total approximately $850 million, excluding AFUDC. As of September 30, 2017, SWEPCo had incurred costs of $398 million, including AFUDC, related to these projects.  Management continues to evaluate the impact of environmental rules and related project cost estimates. As of September 30, 2017, the total net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $626 million, before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP. 

In 2016, as approved by the APSC, SWEPCo began recovering $79 million related to the Arkansas jurisdictional share of these environmental costs, subject to prudence review in the next Arkansas filed base rate proceeding. In December 2016, the LPSC approved deferral of certain expenses related to the Louisiana jurisdictional share of environmental controls installed at Welsh Plant. In April 2017, the LPSC approved SWEPCo’s recovery of these deferred costs effective May 2017. SWEPCo’s approved Louisiana jurisdictional share of Welsh Plant deferrals: (a) are $11 million, excluding $6 million of unrecognized equity as of September 30, 2017, (b) is subject to review by the LPSC, and (c) includes a WACC return on environmental investments and the related depreciation expense and taxes. Effective May 2017, SWEPCo began recovering $131 million in investments related to its Louisiana jurisdictional share of environmental costs. SWEPCo has sought recovery of its project costs from retail customers in its current Texas base rate case at the PUCT and is recovering these costs from wholesale customers through SWEPCo’s FERC-approved agreements.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See “Welsh Plant - Environmental Impact” section of Note 4.

Westinghouse Electric Company Bankruptcy Filing

In March 2017, Westinghouse filed a petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  It intends to reorganize, not cease business operations. However, it is in the early stages of the bankruptcy process and it is unclear whether the company can successfully reorganize.  Westinghouse and I&M have a number of significant ongoing contracts relating to reactor services, nuclear fuel fabrication, and ongoing engineering projects.  The most significant of these relate to Cook Plant fuel fabrication.  I&M is evaluating how this reorganization affects these contracts.  Westinghouse has stated that it intends to continue performance on I&M’s contracts, but given the importance of upcoming dates in the fuel fabrication process for Cook Plant, and their vital part in Cook Plant’s ongoing operations, I&M continues to work with Westinghouse in the bankruptcy proceedings to avoid any interruptions to that service. In the unlikely event Westinghouse rejects I&M’s contracts, or is unable to reorganize or sell its profitable businesses in the bankruptcy, Cook Plant’s operations would be significantly impacted and potentially shut down temporarily as I&M seeks other vendors for these services.


LITIGATION


In the ordinary course of business, AEP is involved in employment, commercial, environmental and regulatory litigation. Since it is difficult to predict the outcome of these proceedings, management cannot predict the eventual resolution, timing or amount of any loss, fine or penalty. Management assesses the probability of loss for each contingency and accrues a liability for cases that have a probable likelihood of loss if the loss can be estimated.  For details on the regulatory proceedings and pending litigation see Note 4 - Rate Matters, Note 6 - Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies and the “Litigation” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 2016 Annual Report. Additionally, see Note 4 - Rate Matters and Note 5 - Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies included herein. Adverse results in these proceedings have the potential to reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. See Note 4 – Rate Matters and Note 5 – Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies for additional information.


Rockport Plant Litigation Related to Ohio House Bill 6 (HB 6)


In 2019, Ohio adopted and implemented HB 6 which benefits OPCo by authorizing rate recovery for certain costs including renewable energy contracts and OVEC’s coal-fired generating units. OPCo engaged in lobbying efforts and provided testimony during the legislative process in connection with HB 6. In July 2013,2020, an investigation led by the Wilmington Trust CompanyU.S. Attorney’s Office resulted in a federal grand jury indictment of an Ohio legislator and associates in connection with an alleged racketeering conspiracy involving the adoption of HB 6. After AEP learned of the criminal allegations against the Ohio legislator and others relating to HB 6, AEP, with assistance from outside advisors, conducted a review of the circumstances surrounding the passage of the bill. Management does not believe that AEP was involved in any wrongful conduct in connection with the passage of HB 6.

In August 2020, an AEP shareholder filed a complaintputative class action lawsuit in U.S.the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOhio against AEGCoAEP and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened bycertain of its officers for alleged violations of securities laws. In December 2021, the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiffs further allege that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiffs.  The New York court granted a motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M.

In January 2015, thedistrict court issued an opinion and order grantingdismissing the motion in part and denyingsecurities litigation complaint with prejudice, determining that the motion in part.complaint failed to plead any actionable misrepresentations or omissions. The court dismissed certain ofplaintiffs did not appeal the plaintiffs’ claims, including the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiffs’ claims seeking compensatory damages. Several claims remained, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach ofruling.

In January 2021, an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In June 2015, AEGCo and I&MAEP shareholder filed a motion for partial judgment on the claims seeking dismissal of the breach of participation agreement claim as well as any claim for indemnification of costs associated with this case. The plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint to add another claim under the lease and also filed a motion for partial summary judgment. In November 2015, AEGCo and I&M filed a motion to strike the plaintiffs’ motion for partial judgment and filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim.

In March 2016, the court entered an opinion and orderderivative action in favor of AEGCo and I&M, dismissing certain of the plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and dismissing claims for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and further dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for indemnification of costs. By the same order, the court permitted plaintiffs to move forward with their claim that AEGCo and I&M failed to exercise prudent utility practices in the maintenance and operation of Rockport Plant, Unit 2. In April 2016, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of all remaining claims with prejudice and the court subsequently entered a final judgment. In May 2016, plaintiffs filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on whether AEGCo and I&M are in breach of certain contract provisions that plaintiffs allege operate to protect the plaintiffs’ residual interests in the unit and whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ claims that AEGCo and I&M breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

In April 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion reversing the district court’s decisions which had dismissed certain of plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and remanding the case to the district court to enter summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor consistent with that ruling. In April 2017, AEGCo and I&M filed a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which was granted. In June 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an amended opinion and judgment which reverses the district court’s dismissal of certain of the owners’ claims under the lease agreements, vacates the denial of the owners’ motion for partial summary judgment and remands the case to the district court for further proceedings.  The amended opinion and judgment also affirms the district court’s dismissal of the owners’ breach of good faith and fair dealing claim as duplicative of the breach of contract claims and removes the instruction to the district court in the original opinion to enter summary judgment in favor of the owners.


In July 2017, AEP filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio seekingpurporting to modifyassert claims on behalf of AEP against certain AEP officers and directors. In February 2021, a second AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the consent decreeCourt of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio. In April 2021, a third AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and a fourth AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Nassau County. These derivative complaints allege the officers and directors made misrepresentations and omissions similar to eliminatethose alleged in the obligation to install future controls at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 if AEP does not acquire ownershipputative securities class action lawsuit filed against AEP. The derivative complaints together assert claims for: (a) breach of that Unit,fiduciary duty, (b) waste of corporate assets, (c) unjust enrichment, (d) breach of duty for insider trading and to modify the consent decree in other respects to preserve the environmental benefits(e) contribution for violations of sections 10(b) and 21D of the consent decree. In October 2017,Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and seek monetary damages and changes to AEP’s corporate governance and internal policies among other forms of relief. The court entered a scheduling order in the ownersNew York state court derivative action staying the case other than with respect to briefing the motion to dismiss. AEP filed substantive and forum-based motions to dismiss on April 29, 2022. On September 13, 2022, the New York state court granted the forum-based motion to dismiss with prejudice and the plaintiff subsequently filed a notice of appeal with the New York appellate court. On January 20, 2023, the New York plaintiff filed a motion to stay their claimsintervene in the pending Ohio federal court action and withdrew his appeal in New York. The two derivative actions pending in federal district court in Ohio have been consolidated and the plaintiffs in the consolidated action filed an amended complaint. AEP filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint and subsequently filed a brief in opposition to the New York plaintiffs’ motion to intervene in the consolidated action in Ohio. On March 20, 2023, the federal district court issued an order granting the motion to dismiss with prejudice and denying the New York plaintiffs’ motion to intervene. On April 20, 2023, one of the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit of the Ohio federal district court order dismissing the consolidated action and denying the intervention. On June 15, 2022, the Ohio state court entered an order continuing the stays of that case until January 2018, to afford time forthe final resolution of AEP’s motion to modify the consent decree.

Managementconsolidated derivative actions pending in Ohio federal district court. The defendants will continue to defend against the claims. Given that the district court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims seeking compensatory relief as premature, and that plaintiffs have yet to present a methodology for determining or any analysis supporting any alleged damages, managementManagement is unable to determine a range of potential losses that areis reasonably possible of occurring.


12


In March 2021, AEP received a litigation demand letter from counsel representing a purported AEP shareholder. The litigation demand letter was directed to the Board of Directors of AEP (AEP Board) and contained factual allegations involving HB 6 that were generally consistent with those in the derivative litigation filed in state and federal court. The shareholder that sent the letter has since withdrawn the litigation demand, which is now terminated and of no further effect. In April 2023, AEP received a litigation demand from counsel representing the purported AEP shareholder who filed the dismissed derivative action in New York state court and unsuccessfully tried to intervene in the consolidated derivative actions in Ohio federal court. The litigation demand letter is directed to the AEP Board and contains factual allegations involving HB 6 that are generally consistent with those in the derivative litigation filed in state and federal court. The letter demands, among other things, that the AEP Board undertake an independent investigation into alleged legal violations by certain current and former directors and officers, and that AEP commence a civil action for breaches of fiduciary duty and related claims against any individuals who allegedly harmed AEP. The AEP Board will act in response to the letter as appropriate. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that is reasonably possible of occurring.

In May 2021, AEP received a subpoena from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement seeking various documents, including documents relating to the passage of HB 6 and documents relating to AEP’s policies and financial processes and controls. In August 2022, AEP received a second subpoena from the SEC seeking various additional documents relating to its ongoing investigation. AEP is cooperating fully with the SEC’s investigation, which has included taking testimony from certain individuals and inquiries regarding Empowering Ohio’s Economy, Inc., which is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, and related disclosures. Although the outcome of the SEC’s investigation cannot be predicted, management does not believe the results of this investigation will have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Claims for Indemnification Made by Owners of the Gavin Power Station

In November 2022, the Federal EPA issued a final decision denying Gavin Power LLC’s requested extension to allow a CCR surface impoundment at the Gavin Power Station to continue to receive CCR and non-CCR waste streams after April 11, 2021 until May 4, 2023 (the Gavin Denial). As part of the Gavin Denial, the Federal EPA made several determinations related to the CCR Rule (see “Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) Rule” section below for additional information), including a determination that the closure of the 300 acre unlined fly ash reservoir (FAR) is noncompliant with the CCR Rule in multiple respects. The Gavin Power Station was formerly owned and operated by AEP and was sold to Gavin Power LLC and Lightstone Generation LLC in 2017. Pursuant to the PSA, AEP maintained responsibility to complete closure of the FAR in accordance with the closure plan approved by the Ohio EPA which was completed in July 2021. The PSA contains indemnification provisions, pursuant to which the owners of the Gavin Power Station have notified AEP they believe they are entitled to indemnification for any damages that may result from these claims, including any future enforcement or litigation resulting from the Federal EPA’s determinations of noncompliance with various aspects of the CCR Rule as part of the Gavin Denial. The owners of the Gavin Power Station have also sought indemnification for landowner claims for property damage allegedly caused by modifications to the FAR. Management does not believe that the owners of the Gavin Power Station have any valid claim for indemnity or otherwise against AEP under the PSA. In addition, Gavin Power LLC, several AEP subsidiaries, and other parties have filed Petitions for Review of the Gavin Denial with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that is reasonably possible of occurring.

Claims for Damages Related to Sabine Lignite Mining Agreement

In May 2023, North American Coal Corporation (NACC) and Sabine, a subsidiary of NACC, filed suit against SWEPCo in Texas state court for breach of the Lignite Mining Agreement (LMA) between Sabine and SWEPCo. NACC and Sabine assert that the terms of the LMA require SWEPCo to continue operating the Pirkey Plant and obtaining coal from the Sabine mine through 2035 and that SWEPCo has breached the agreement by closing the plant. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief ordering SWEPCo to cease demolition and reclamation activities at the Pirkey Plant and the Sabine mine and damages, which Sabine has asserted are $85 million in lost fees. The parties have entered into a standstill agreement staying both the litigation and certain demolition and reclamation activities at the Pirkey Plant and the Sabine mine. SWEPCo will continue to defend against the claims. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that is reasonably possible of occurring.
13


ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES


AEP has a substantial capital investment program and is incurringincurs additional operational costs to comply with environmental control requirements.  Additional investments and operational changes will need to be made in response to existing and anticipated requirements such as new CAA requirements to reduce emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants,generation and in response to rules governing the beneficial use and disposal of coal combustion products,by-products, clean water rules and renewal permits for certain water discharges.


AEP is engaged in litigation about environmental issues, was notified of potential responsibility for the clean-up of contaminated sites and incurred costs for disposal of SNF and future decommissioning of the nuclear units.  AEP, along with various industry groups, affected states and other parties challenged some of the Federal EPA requirements in court.  Management is also engaged in the development of possible future requirements including the items discussed below.  Management believes that further analysis and better coordination of these environmental requirements would facilitate planning and lower overall compliance costs while achieving the same environmental goals.


See a complete discussion of these matters in the “Environmental Issues” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 2016 Annual Report. AEP will seek recovery of expenditures for pollution control technologies and associated costs from customers through rates in regulated jurisdictions.  Environmental rules could result in accelerated depreciation, impairment of assets or regulatory disallowances.  If AEP is unable tocannot recover the costs of environmental compliance, it would reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


Environmental Controls Impact on the Generating Fleet


The rules and proposed environmental controls discussed in the next several sectionsbelow will have a materialan impact on theAEP System generating units in the AEP System.units.  Management continues to evaluate the impact of these rules, project scope and technology available to achieve compliance.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the AEP System had a totalowned generating capacity of approximately 25,60024,700 MWs, of which approximately 13,50010,700 MWs arewere coal-fired.  Management continues to refine the cost estimates of complying with these rules and other impacts of the environmental proposals on the fossil generating facilities. Based upon management estimates, AEP’s investment to meet these existing and proposed requirements ranges from approximately $2.2 billion to $2.8 billion between 2017 and 2025.generation.


The cost estimates will change depending on the timing of implementation and whether the Federal EPA provides flexibility in finalizing proposed rules or reviewing and revising certain existing requirements.  The cost estimates will also change based on: (a) the states’ implementation of these regulatory programs, including the potential for state implementation plans (SIPs) or federal implementation plans (FIPs)rules that impose more stringent standards, (b) additional rulemaking activities in response to court decisions, (c) the actual performance of the pollution control technologies installed, on the units, (d) changes in costs for new pollution controls, (e) new generating technology developments, (f) total MWs of capacity retired and replaced, including the type and amount of such replacement capacity, (g) compliance with the Federal EPA’s revised coal combustion residual rules and (g)(h) other factors.  In addition, management is continuingcontinues to evaluate the economic feasibility of environmental investments on both regulated and competitive plants.




The table below represents the plants or units of plants retired in 2016 and 2015 with a remaining net book value. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value before cost of removal, including related materials and supplies inventory and CWIP balances, of the units listed below was approved for recovery, except for $338 million. Management is seeking or will seek recovery of the remaining net book value associated with these plants in future rate proceedings.
    Generating Amounts Pending
Company Plant Name and Unit Capacity Regulatory Approval
    (in MWs)  (in millions)
APCo Kanawha River Plant 400
 $42.3
APCo Clinch River Plant, Unit 3 235
 32.7
APCo (a) Clinch River Plant, Units 1 and 2 470
 31.8
APCo Sporn Plant 600
 17.2
APCo Glen Lyn Plant 335
 13.4
I&M (b) Tanners Creek Plant 995
 42.6
PSO (c) Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 470
 82.4
SWEPCo (d) Welsh Plant, Unit 2 528
 75.9
Total   4,033
 $338.3

(a)APCo obtained permits following the Virginia SCC’s and WVPSC’s approval to convert its 470 MW Clinch River Plant, Units 1 and 2 to natural gas. In 2015, APCo retired the coal-related assets of Clinch River Plant, Units 1 and 2. Clinch River Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2 began operations as natural gas units in February 2016 and April 2016, respectively.
(b)I&M requested recovery of the Indiana (approximately 65%) and Michigan (approximately 14%) jurisdictional shares of the remaining retirement costs of Tanners Creek Plant in the 2017 Indiana and Michigan base rate cases.
(c)
For Northeastern Plant, Unit 4, in November and December 2016, the OCC issued orders that provided no determination related to the return of and return on the post-retirement remaining net book value. In June 2017, PSO filed an application for a base rate review with the OCC. As part of this filing, PSO requested recovery of approximately $82 millionthrough 2040 related tothe net book value of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 that was retired in 2016. This regulatory asset is pending regulatory approval.
(d)SWEPCo requested recovery of the Texas jurisdictional share (approximately 33%) of the net book value of Welsh Plant, Unit 2 in the 2016 Texas Base Rate Case. This regulatory asset is pending regulatory approval.

In January 2017, Dayton Power and Light Company announced the future retirement of the 2,308 MW Stuart Plant, Units 1-4. The retirement is scheduled for June 2018. Stuart Plant, Units 1-4 are operated by Dayton Power and Light Company and are jointly owned by AGR and nonaffiliated entities. AGR owns 600 MWs of the Stuart Plant, Units 1-4. As of September 30, 2017, AGR’s net book value of the Stuart Plant, Units 1-4 was zero.

To the extent existing generation assets and the cost of new equipment and converted facilities are not recoverable, it could materially reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Proposed Modification of the New Source Review (NSR) Litigation Consent Decree

In 2007, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio approved a consent decree between the AEP subsidiaries in the eastern area of the AEP System and the Department of Justice, the Federal EPA, eight northeastern states and other interested parties to settle claims that the AEP subsidiaries violated the NSR provisions of the CAA when it undertook various equipment repair and replacement projects over a period of nearly 20 years.  The consent decree’s terms include installation of environmental control equipment on certain generating units, a declining cap on SO2 and NOx emissions from the AEP System and various mitigation projects.

In July 2017, AEP filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio seeking to modify the consent decree to eliminate an obligation to install future controls at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 if AEP does not acquire ownership of that unit, and to modify the consent decree in other respects to preserve the environmental benefits of the consent decree.  The district court granted AEP’s request to delay the deadline to install SCR technology at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 until March 2020, pending resolution of the motion.  AEP also proposes to retire Conesville Plant, Units 5 and 6 by December 31, 2022 and to retire one Rockport Plant unit by December 31, 2028.


AEP is seeking to modify the consent decree as a means to resolve or substantially narrow the issues in pending litigation with the owners of Rockport Plant, Unit 2. See “Rockport Plant Litigation” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 5 - Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies for additional information.

Clean Air Act Requirements


The CAA establishes a comprehensive program to protect and improve the nation’s air quality and control sources of air emissions. The states implement and administer many of these programs and could impose additional or more stringent requirements. The primary regulatory programs that continue to drive investments in AEP’s existing generating units include: (a) periodic revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)NAAQS and the development of SIPs to achieve any more stringent standards;standards, (b) implementation of the regional haze program by the states and the Federal EPA;EPA, (c) regulation of hazardous air pollutant emissions under the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule;MATS, (d) implementation and review of the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), a FIP designed to eliminate significant contributions from sources in upwind states to nonattainment or maintenance areas in downwind statesCSAPR and (e) the Federal EPA’s regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil-fueled electric generating unitsfossil generation under Section 111 of the CAA.

In March 2017, President Trump issued a series of executive orders designed to allow the Federal EPA to review and take appropriate action to revise or rescind regulatory requirements that place undue burdens on affected entities, including specific orders directing the Federal EPA to review rules that unnecessarily burden the production and use of energy. The Federal EPA published notice and an opportunity to comment on how to identify such requirements and what steps can be taken to reduce or eliminate such burdens. Future changes that result from this effort may affect AEP’s compliance plans.

Notable developments in significant CAA regulatory requirements affecting AEP’s operations are discussed in the following sections.


National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)


The Federal EPA issued new, more stringentperiodically reviews and revises the NAAQS for SO2criteria pollutants under the CAA. Revisions tend to increase the stringency of the standards, which in 2010, PMturn may require AEP to make investments in 2012pollution control equipment at existing generating units, or, since most units are already well controlled, to make changes in how units are dispatched and ozone in 2015. Implementation of these standards is underway. States are still in the process of evaluating the attainment status and need for additional control measures in order to attain and maintain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and may develop additional requirements for AEP’s facilities as a result of those evaluations.operated. In April 2017,January 2023, the Federal EPA requested a stay of proceedings inannounced its proposed decision to strengthen the U.S. Court of Appealsprimary (health-based) annual PM2.5 standard. The Biden administration has previously indicated that it is likely to revisit the NAAQS for the District of Columbia Circuit where challenges to the 2015 ozone, standard are pending, to allow reconsideration of that standardwhich were left unchanged by the new administration. The Federal EPA initially announced a one-year delay in the designation of ozone non-attainment areas, but withdrew that decision. Final designations were due October 1, 2017, but have not yet been announced.prior administration following its review. Management cannot currently predict the nature, stringencyif any changes to either standard are likely to be finalized or timing of additional requirements for AEP’s facilities based on the outcome of these activities.what such changes may be, but will continue to monitor this issue and any future rulemakings

14


Regional Haze


The Federal EPA issued a Clean Air Visibility Rule (CAVR), detailing how the CAA’s requirement that certain in 2005, which could require power plants and other facilities to install best available retrofit technology (BART) willto address regional haze in federal parks and other protected areas. BART requirements apply to facilities built between 1962 and 1977 that emit more than 250 tons per year of certain pollutants in specific industrial categories, including power plants.  CAVR will beis implemented by the states, through SIPs, or if SIPs are not adequate or are not developed on schedule,by the Federal EPA, through FIPs. In January 2017, the Federal EPA revised the rules governing submission of SIPs to implement the visibility programs, including a provision that postponespostponed the due date for the next comprehensive SIP revisions until 2021. Petitions for review of the final rule revisions have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.


The Federal EPA proposed disapproval ofArkansas has an approved regional haze SIPsSIP and all of SWEPCo's affected units are in a few states, including Arkansas and Texas.  In March 2012, the Federal EPA disapproved certain portions of the Arkansas regional haze SIP. In April 2015, the Federal EPA published a proposed FIP to replace the disapproved portions, including revised BART determinations for the Flint Creek Plant that were consistentcompliance with the environmental controls currently under construction. relevant requirements.

In September 2016, the Federal EPA published a final FIP that retains its BART determinations, but accelerates the schedule for


implementation of certain required controls. The final rule is being challenged in the courts. In March 2017, the Federal EPA filed a motion that was granted by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Court to hold the case in abeyance for 90 days to allow the parties to engage in settlement negotiations. Arkansas issued a proposed SIP revision to allow sources to participate in the CSAPR ozone season program in lieu of the source-specific NOx BART requirements in the FIP, and the Federal EPA has proposed to approve that SIP revision. Arkansas and the Federal EPA have asked the Eighth Circuit to continue to hold litigation in abeyance until October 31, 2017 to facilitate settlement discussions. Management cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.

In January 2016,Texas, the Federal EPA disapproved portions of the Texas regional haze SIP and promulgated a final FIP that did not include any BART determinations. That rule was challenged and stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Court. The parties engaged in a settlement discussion but were unable to reach an agreement. In March 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted partial remand of the final rule. In January 2017, the Federal EPA proposed source-specific BART requirements for SO2 from sources in Texas, including Welsh Plant, Unit 1. Management submitted comments on the proposal and is engaged in discussions with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regarding the development of an alternative to source-specific BART. In September 2017, the Federal EPA issued a final rule withdrawing Texas from the annual CSAPR budget programs. The Federal EPA then issued a separate rule finalizing the regional haze requirements for electric generating units in Texas and confirmed TCEQ’s determination that no new PM limitations are required for regional haze. The Federal EPA also finalized a FIP that allows participation in the CSAPR ozone season program to satisfy the NOx Xregional haze obligations for electric generating units.units in Texas. Additionally, the Federal EPA finalized an intrastate SO2 emissions trading program based on CSAPR allowance allocations as an alternativeallocations. Legal challenges to source-specific SO2 requirements. The proposed source-specific approach calledthese various rulemakings are pending in both the U.S. Court of Appeals for a wet FGD system to be installed on Welsh Plant, Unit 1. The opportunity to use emissions trading to satisfy the regional haze requirements for NOxFifth Circuit and SO2 at AEP’s affected generating units provides greater flexibility and lower cost compliance options than the original proposal.

In June 2012, the Federal EPA published revisions to the regional haze rules to allow states participating in the CSAPR trading programs to use those programs in place of source-specific BART for SO2 and NOx emissions based on its determination that CSAPR results in greater visibility improvements than source-specific BART in the CSAPR states.  This rule is being challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Management cannot predict the outcome of that litigation, although management supports the intrastate trading program as a compliance with CSAPR programs as satisfactionalternative to source-specific controls and has intervened in the litigation in support of the BART requirements.Federal EPA.


Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)


In 2011,CSAPR is a regional trading program that the Federal EPA issued CSAPR as a replacement for the CAIR, a regional trading programbegan implementing in 2015, which was designed to address interstate transport of emissions that contributedcontribute significantly to downwind nonattainmentnon-attainment and interfere with maintenance of the 1997 ozone NAAQS and the 1997 and 2006 PM NAAQS.  Certain revisions to the rule were finalizedNAAQS in 2012.downwind states.  CSAPR relies on newly-created SO2 and NOx Xallowances and individual state budgets to compel further emission reductions from electric utility generating units.  Interstate trading of allowances is allowed on a restricted sub-regional basis. The Federal EPA has revised, or updated, the CSAPR trading programs several times since they were established.


Numerous affected entities,In January 2021, the Federal EPA finalized a revised CSAPR, which substantially reduced the ozone season NOX budgets for several states, including states where AEP operates, beginning in ozone season 2021. Several utilities and other parties filed petitionsentities potentially subject to review the CSAPR in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The court stayed implementation of the rule.  Following extended proceedingsFederal EPA’s NOX regulations challenged that final rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and oral argument was held in September 2022. In March 2023, the court rejected the challenge and upheld the rule. Management believes it can meet the requirements of the rule in the near term, and is evaluating its compliance options for later years, when the budgets are further reduced. In addition, in February 2023, the Federal EPA Administrator finalized the disapproval of interstate transport SIPs submitted by 19 states addressing the 2015 Ozone NAAQS. Disapproval of the SIPs provides the Federal EPA with authority to impose a FIP for those states, replacing the SIPs that were disapproved. Various legal challenges have been brought by several states, utilities and other industry parties challenging the SIP disapproval. SWEPCo filed a petition for review of the disapproval of the Arkansas SIP in the U.S. Supreme Court but whileof Appeals for the litigation was stillEighth Circuit on April 14, 2023. In March 2023, the Federal EPA finalized a FIP that further revises the ozone season NOX budgets under the existing CSAPR program in states to which the FIP applies. The FIP will take effect August 4, 2023. In May 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stayed the Federal EPA’s disapproval of the Texas and Louisiana SIPs pending a decision on the merits of the appeal, calling into question the Federal EPA’s ability to enforce the FIP in those states. Since then, federal courts have stayed the denial of state SIPs in five other states. In addition, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an administrative stay of the Federal EPA’s disapproval of the Kentucky SIP pending the court’s disposition of Kentucky’s stay motion. In June 2023, the Federal EPA signed an interim final rule staying the applicability of the FIP in six states subject to judicial stays, including Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Texas, and adjusting certain compliance dates. Management is evaluating the impacts of the FIP and cannot predict the outcome of the litigation.
15


Climate Change, CO2 Regulation and Energy Policy

In 2019, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule established a framework for states to adopt standards of performance for utility boilers based on heat rate improvements for such boilers. However, in January 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit grantedvacated the ACE rule and remanded it to the Federal EPA’s motion to liftEPA. In October 2021, the stayUnited States Supreme Court granted certiorari and allow Phase Icombined four separate petitions seeking review of CSAPR to take effect on January 1, 2015 and Phase II to take effect on January 1, 2017. In July 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found thatCourt decisions. Oral arguments were held in February 2022 and on June 30, 2022, the Federal EPA over-controlled the SO2 and/or NOx budgets of 14 states. The U.S.United States Supreme Court of Appeals forreversed the District of Columbia Circuit Court’s decision and remanded the rule tofor further proceedings. In May 2023, the Federal EPA proposed greenhouse gas standards and guidelines for new and existing fossil-fuel fired sources. The proposal relies heavily on carbon capture and sequestration and natural gas co-firing as means to timely revise the rule consistent with the court’s opinion while CSAPR remains in place.

In October 2016, a final rule was issuedreduce CO2 emissions from coal fired plants and hydrogen co-firing and carbon capture and sequestration to address the remand and to incorporate additional changes necessary to address the 2008 ozone standard. The final rule significantly reduces ozone season budgets in many states and discounts the value of banked CSAPR ozone season allowances beginning with the 2017 ozone season. The rule has been challenged in the courts and petitions for administrative reconsideration have been filed. The rule remains in effect.reduce CO2 emissions from gas turbines. Management is complying withevaluating the more stringent ozone season budgets while these petitionsproposed rule.

While no federal regulatory requirements to reduce CO2 emissions are being considered.



Mercuryin place, AEP has taken action to reduce and Other Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) Regulation

In 2012, the Federal EPA issued a rule addressing a broad range of HAPs from coal and oil-fired power plants.  The rule establishes unit-specific emission rates for units burning coal on a 30-day rolling average basis for mercury, PM (as a surrogate for particles of nonmercury metals) and hydrogen chloride (as a surrogate for acid gases).  In addition, the rule proposes work practice standards, such as boiler tune-ups, for controlling emissions of organic HAPs and dioxin/furans.  Compliance was required within three years. Management obtained administrative extensions for up to one year at several units to facilitate the installation of controls or to avoid a serious reliability problem.

In April 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied all of the petitions for review of the April 2012 final rule. Industry trade groups and several states filed petitions for further review in the U.S. Supreme Court and the court granted those petitions in November 2014.

In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit remanded the MATS rule for further proceedings consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that the Federal EPA was unreasonable in refusing to consider costs in its determination whether to regulate emissions of HAPs from power plants. The Federal EPA issued notice of a supplemental finding concluding that it is appropriate and necessary to regulate HAPoffset CO2 emissions from its generating fleet. AEP expects CO2 emissions from its operations to continue to decline due to the retirement of some of its coal-fired generation units, and oil-fired units. Management submitted comments onactions taken to diversify the proposal. In April 2016, the Federal EPA affirmed its determination that regulation of HAPs from electric generating unitsgeneration fleet and increase energy efficiency where there is necessary and appropriate. Petitionsregulatory support for review of the Federal EPA’s April 2016 determination have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Oral argument was scheduled for May 2017, but in April 2017 the Federal EPA requested that oral argument be postponed to facilitate its review of the rule. The rule remains in effect.

Climate Change, CO2 Regulation and Energy Policy

such activities. The majority of the states where AEP has generating facilities passed legislation establishing renewable energy, alternative energy and/or energy efficiency requirements that can assist in reducing carbon emissions.  In April 2020, Virginia enacted clean energy legislation to allow the state to participate in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), require the retirement of all fossil-fueled generation by 2045 and require 100% renewable energy to be provided to Virginia customers by 2050. Management is taking steps to comply with these requirements, including increasing wind and solar installations, andpurchasing renewable power purchases and broadening the AEP System’s portfolio of energy efficiency programs.

In October 2015,early 2022, Virginia’s governor issued an executive order directing his administration to end Virginia’s participation in RGGI. In June 2023, the Federal EPA published the final standards for new, modified and reconstructed fossil fired steam generating units and combustion turbines, and final guidelines for the development of state plansVirginia Air Pollution Control Board approved a regulation to regulate CO2 emissionswithdraw Virginia from existing sources. The final standard for new combustion turbines is 1,000 pounds of CO2 per MWhRGGI and the final standard for new fossil steam units is 1,400 pounds of CO2 per MWh. Reconstructed turbines are subjectgovernor submitted the regulation to the same standard as new units andVirginia Register, meaning that the regulation will be effective at the end of August 2023, if there are no standard for modified combustion turbines was issued. Reconstructed fossil steam units are subject to a standard of 1,800 pounds of CO2 per MWh for larger units and 2,000 pounds of CO2 per MWh for smaller units. Modified fossil steam unitsother changes. The withdrawal will be effective on December 31, 2023 although it may be subject to a site specific standard no lower than the standards that would be applied if the units were reconstructed.legal challenge.


The final emissions guidelines for existing sources, known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP), areIn October 2022, AEP announced new intermediate and long-term CO2 emission reduction goals, based on the output of the company’s integrated resource plans, which take into account economics, customer demand, grid reliability and resiliency, regulations and the company’s current business strategy. AEP adjusted its near-term CO2 emission reduction target from a series of declining emission rates that are implemented beginning2000 baseline to a 2005 baseline, upgraded its 80% reduction by 2030 target to include full Scope 1 emissions and accelerated its net-zero goal by five years to 2045. AEP’s total Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2022 through 2029. The finalwere approximately 52.5 million metric tons CO2e, approximately a 65% reduction from AEP’s 2005 Scope 1 GHG emissions (inclusive of emission ratereductions that result from plants that have been sold). AEP has made significant progress in reducing CO2 emissions from its power generation fleet and expects its emissions to continue to decline. Technological advances, including energy storage, will determine how quickly AEP can achieve zero emissions while continuing to provide reliable, affordable power for customers.

Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations have led to the announcement of early plant closures and could force AEP to close additional coal-fired generation facilities earlier than their estimated useful life. If AEP is 771 poundsunable to recover the costs of CO2 per MWh for existing natural gas combined cycle unitsits investments, it would reduce future net income and 1,305 pounds of CO2 per MWh for existing fossil steam units in 2030cash flows and thereafter. The Federal EPA also developed a set of rate-basedimpact financial condition.

Mercury and mass-based state goals.Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule


The Federal EPA also published proposed “model” rules that can be adopted by the states that would allow sources within “trading ready” state programs to trade, bank or sell allowances or credits issued by the states. These rules would also be the basis for any federal plan issued by the Federal EPA in a state that fails to submit or receive approval for a state plan. In June 2016,April 2023, the Federal EPA issued a separate proposalproposed rule that would revise the MATS for power plants. The proposed rule includes a more stringent standard for emissions of filterable PM for coal-fired electric generating units, as well as a new mercury standard for lignite-fired electric generating units. The proposed rule also requires the Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP) that was included ininstallation and operation of continuous emissions monitors for PM. Management is evaluating the model rules.impacts of the rule as proposed and will continue to monitor the rulemaking.



16


Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) Rule

The final rules are being challenged inFederal EPA’s CCR rule regulates the courts. disposal and beneficial re-use of CCR, including fly ash and bottom ash created from coal-fired generating units and FGD gypsum generated at some coal-fired plants.  The rule applies to active and inactive CCR landfills and surface impoundments at facilities of active electric utility or independent power producers.

In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay on the final CPP, including all of the deadlines for submission of initial or final state plans. The stay will remain in effect until a final decision is issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court considers any petition for review. In April 2017,2020, the Federal EPA withdrew its previously issued proposalsrevised the CCR rule to include a requirement that unlined CCR storage ponds cease operations and initiate closure by April 11, 2021. The revised rule provides two options that allow facilities to extend the date by which they must cease receipt of coal ash and close the ponds.

The first option provides an extension to cease receipt of CCR no later than October 15, 2023 for model trading rulesmost units, and October 15, 2024 for a CEIP.narrow subset of units; however, the Federal EPA’s grant of such an extension will be based upon a satisfactory demonstration of the need for additional time to develop alternative ash disposal capacity and will be limited to the soonest timeframe technically feasible to cease receipt of CCR. Additionally, each request must undergo formal review, including public comments, and be approved by the Federal EPA. AEP filed applications for additional time to develop alternative disposal capacity at the following plants:



CompanyPlant NameGenerating
Capacity
Net Book Value (a)Projected
 Retirement Date
(in MWs)(in millions)
AEGCoRockport Plant1,310$302.5 2028
APCoAmos Plant2,9302,136.5 2040
APCoMountaineer Plant1,320970.1 2040
I&MRockport Plant1,310570.6 (b)2028
KPCoMitchell Plant780568.0 2040
SWEPCoFlint Creek Plant258258.6 2038
WPCoMitchell Plant780668.6 2040

(a)Net book value as of June 30, 2023, before cost of removal including CWIP and inventory.
(b)Amount includes a $135 million regulatory asset related to the retired Tanners Creek Plant. The IURC and MPSC authorized recovery of the Tanners Creek Plant regulatory asset over the useful life of Rockport Plant, Unit 1 in 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In March 2017,January 2022, the Federal EPA proposed to deny several extension requests filed by the other utilities based on allegations that those utilities are not in compliance with the CCR Rule (the January Actions). In November 2022, the Federal EPA finalized one of these denials. The Federal EPA’s allegations of noncompliance rely on new interpretations of the CCR Rule requirements. The January Actions of the Federal EPA have been challenged in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as unlawful rulemaking that revises the existing CCR Rule requirements without proper notice of: (a) an Executive Order fromand without opportunity for comment. Management is unable to predict the Presidentoutcome of the United States titled “Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth” directingthat litigation.

In July 2022, the Federal EPA to review the CPP and related rules; (b) the Federal EPA’s initiation of a reviewproposed conditional approval of the CPP and (c) a forthcoming rulemaking related topending extension request for the CPP consistentMountaineer Plant. The Federal EPA alleged that the Mountaineer Plant was not fully compliant with the Executive Order, ifCCR Rule. In December 2022, AEP withdrew the Federal EPA determines appropriate. In this same filing,pending extension request for the Federal EPA also presented a motionMountaineer Plant as work to holdconstruct new CCR disposal facilities was completed and the litigation in abeyance until 30 days after the conclusion of review and any resulting rulemaking. The District of Columbia Circuit granted the Federal EPA’s motion in part and has requested periodic status reports. In October 2017, the Federal EPA issued a proposed rule repealing the CPP and withdrawing the legal memoranda issued in connection with the rule.extension was no longer needed. The Federal EPA has re-examined its legal interpretation of the “best system of emission reduction” and found that basednot yet proposed any action on the statutory text, legislative history, use of similar terms elsewhere in the CAA and its own historic implementation of Section 111 that a narrower interpretation of the term limits it to those designs, processes, control technologies and other systems that can be applied directly to or at the source. Since the primary systems relied on in the CPP are not consistent with that interpretation,pending extension requests submitted by AEP. However, statements made by the Federal EPA proposes thatin the rule be withdrawn. Management does not expect a change in AEP’s overall strategy as a resultcontext of the proposed repeal.

Federal and state legislation or regulationsfinal decisions on extension requests issued to date indicate that mandate limits on the emission of CO2 could result in significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs, which in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs.  Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might force AEP to close some coal-fired facilities and could lead to possible impairment of assets.

Coal Combustion Residual Rule

In April 2015,there is a risk that the Federal EPA published a final rulemay conclude that AEP is not eligible for an extension of time to regulate the disposal and beneficial re-usecease use of coal combustion residuals (CCR), including fly ash and bottom ash generated at coal-fired electric generating units and also FGD gypsum generated at some coal-fired plants.  The final rule has been challengedthose CCR impoundments for which extension requests are pending and/or that one or more of AEP’s facilities is not in the courts.

The final rule became effective in October 2015. The Federal EPA regulates CCR as a non-hazardous solid waste by its issuance of new minimum federal solid waste management standards. The rule applies to new and existing active CCR landfills and CCR surface impoundments at operating electric utility or independent power production facilities. The rule imposes new and additional construction and operating obligations, including location restrictions, liner criteria, structural integrity requirements for impoundments, operating criteria and additional groundwater monitoring requirements to be implemented on a schedule spanning an approximate four year implementation period.

In December 2016, the U.S. Congress passed legislation authorizing states to submit programs to regulate CCR facilities, and the Federal EPA to approve such programs if they are no less stringent than the minimum federal standards. The Federal EPA may also enforce compliance with the minimum standardsCCR Rule. If that occurs, AEP may incur material additional costs to change its plans for complying with the CCR Rule, including the potential to have to temporarily cease operation of one or more facilities until a state program is approved or if states fail to adopt their own programs. In September 2017,an acceptable compliance alternative can be implemented. Such temporary cessation of operation could materially impact the cost of serving customers of the affected utility.


17


Closure and post-closure costs have been included in ARO in accordance with the requirements in the Federal EPA granted industry petitionsEPA’s final CCR rule. Additional ARO revisions will occur on a site-by-site basis if groundwater monitoring activities conclude that corrective actions are required to reconsidermitigate groundwater impacts. AEP may incur significant additional costs complying with the Federal EPA’s CCR rule and asked that litigation regarding the rule be held in abeyance. The court has ordered oral argument to proceed in November 2017 and that the motion for abeyance be addressed during oral argument.

Because AEP currently uses surface impoundments and landfills to manage CCR materials at generating facilities, significantRule, including costs will be incurred to upgrade or close and replace these existing facilities at some point in thesurface impoundments and landfills used to manage CCR and to conduct any required remedial actions including removal of coal ash. If additional costs are incurred and AEP is unable to obtain cost recovery, it would reduce future as the new rule is implemented. Management recorded a $95 million increase in asset retirement obligations in the second quarter of 2015 primarily due to the publication of the final rule.net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. Management will continue to evaluateparticipate in rulemaking activities and make adjustments based on new federal and state requirements affecting its ash disposal units.

Under the rule’ssecond option for obtaining an extension of the April 11, 2021 deadline to cease operation of unlined impoundments, a generating facility may continue operating its existing impoundments without developing alternative CCR disposal, provided the facility commits to cease combustion of coal by a date certain. Under this option, a generating facility would have until October 17, 2023 to cease coal-fired operations and to close CCR storage ponds 40 acres or less in size, or through October 17, 2028 for facilities with CCR storage ponds greater than 40 acres in size. Pursuant to this option, AEP informed the Federal EPA of its intent to retire the Pirkey Plant and cease using coal at the Welsh Plant. In March 2023, the Pirkey Plant was retired. The table below summarizes the net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 as of June 30, 2023.
CompanyPlant Name and UnitGenerating
Capacity
Net Investment (a)Accelerated Depreciation Regulatory AssetProjected
 Retirement Date
(in MWs)(in millions)
SWEPCoWelsh Plant, Units 1 and 31,053$384.3 $105.4 2028(b)(c)

(a)Net book value including CWIP excluding cost of removal and materials and supplies.
(b)In November 2020, management announced it will cease using coal at the Welsh Plant in 2028.
(c)Unit 1 is currently being recovered through 2027 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2037 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions. Unit 3 is currently being recovered through 2032 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2042 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions.

To date, the Federal EPA has not taken any action on these pending extension requests. Under the second option above, AEP may need to recover remaining depreciation and estimated closure costs associated with these plants over a shorter period. If AEP cannot ultimately recover the costs of environmental compliance and/or the remaining depreciation and estimated closure costs associated with these plants in a timely manner, it would reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

In May 2023, the Federal EPA proposed revisions to the CCR Rule to expand the scope of the rule to include inactive impoundments at inactive facilities (“legacy CCR surface impoundments”) as well as to establish requirements for currently exempt solid waste management units that involve the direct placement of CCR on operations.the land (“CCR management units”). Management is still evaluating the impacts the proposed rule would have, if finalized.


Clean Water Act (CWA) Regulations


In 2014, theThe Federal EPA issued a finalEPA’s ELG rule setting forth standards for existing power plants that is intended to reduce mortality of aquatic organisms pinned against a plant’s cooling water intake screen (impingement) or entrained in the cooling water.  Entrainment is when small fish, eggs or larvae are drawn into the cooling water system and affected by heat, chemicals or physical stress.  The final rule affects all plants withdrawing more than two million gallons of cooling water per day. The rule offers seven technology options to comply with the impingement standard and requires site-specific studies to determine appropriate entrainment compliance measures atgenerating facilities withdrawing more than


125 million gallons per day. Additional requirements may be imposed as a result of consultation with other federal agencies to protect threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Facilities with existing closed cycle recirculating cooling systems, as defined in the rule, are not expected to require any technology changes. Facilities subject to both the impingement standard and site-specific entrainment studies will typically be given at least three years to conduct and submit the results of those studies to the permit agency. Compliance timeframes will then be established by the permit agency through each facility’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for installation of any required technology changes, as those permits are renewed over the next five to eight years. Petitions for review of the final rule were filed by industry and environmental groups and are currently pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

In addition, the Federal EPA developed revised effluent limitation guidelines for electricity generating facilities.  A final rule was issued in November 2015. The final rule establishes limits onfor FGD wastewater, fly ash and bottom ash transport water and flue gas mercury control wastewater, as soon as possible after November 2018 and no later than December 2023. These new requirements willwhich are to be implemented through each facility’s wastewater discharge permit. TheA revision to the ELG rule, has been challengedpublished in the U.S. CourtOctober 2020, established additional options for reusing and discharging small volumes of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In March 2017, industry associations filed a petition for reconsideration of the rule with the Federal EPA. In April 2017, the Federal EPA granted reconsideration of the rule and issued a stay of the rule’s future compliance deadlines, which has now expired. In April 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a stay of the litigation for 120 days. In June 2017, the Federal EPA also issued a proposal to temporarily postpone certain compliance deadlines in the rule. A final rule revising the compliance deadlines for FGD wastewater and bottom ash transport water, provided an exception for retiring units and extended the compliance deadline to bea date as soon as possible beginning one year after the rule was published but no earlierlater than 2020 was issued in September 2017.December 2025. Management submitted comments supporting the proposed postponement. Management continues to assesshas assessed technology additions and retrofits to comply with the rule and the impacts of the Federal EPA’s recent actions on facilities’ wastewater discharge permitting.permitting for FGD wastewater and bottom ash transport water. For affected facilities that must install additional technologies to meet the ELG rule limits, permit modifications were filed in January 2021 that reflect the outcome of that assessment. AEP continues to work with state agencies to finalize permit terms and conditions. Other facilities opted to file Notices of Planned Participation (NOPP), pursuant to which the facilities are not required to install additional controls to meet ELG limits provided they make commitments to cease coal combustion by a date certain. In March

18


In June 2015,2023, the Federal EPA proposed further revisions to the ELG rule which, if finalized, would establish a zero discharge standard for FGD wastewater and bottom ash transport water, and more stringent discharge limits for combustion residual leachate. Management is evaluating the U.S. Army Corpsimpacts of Engineers jointly issued a finalthe proposed rule to clarify the scope of the regulatory definition of “waters of the United States” in light of recent U.S. Supreme Court cases. The CWA provides for federal jurisdiction over “navigable waters” defined as “the waters of the United States.” This jurisdictional definition applies to all CWA programs, potentially impacting generation, transmission and distribution permitting and compliance requirements. Among those programs are permits for wastewater and storm water discharges, permits for impacts to wetlands and water bodies and oil spill prevention planning. The final definition continues to recognize traditional navigable waters of the U.S. as jurisdictional as well as certain exclusions. The rule also contains a number of new specific definitions and criteria for determiningoperations. Management cannot predict whether certain other waters are jurisdictional because of a “significant nexus.” Management believes that clarity and efficiency in the permitting process is needed. Management remains concerned that the rule introduces new concepts and could subject more of AEP’s operations to CWA jurisdiction, thereby increasing the time and complexity of permitting. The final rule is being challenged in both courts of appeal and district courts. Challengers include industry associations of which AEP is a member. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted a nationwide stay of the rule pending jurisdictional determinations. In February 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a decision holding that it has exclusive jurisdiction to decide the challenges to the “waters of the United States” rule. Industry, state and related associations have filed petitions for a rehearing of the jurisdictional decision. In April 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied the petitions. In January 2017, the decision was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari to review the jurisdictional issue. The U.S. Supreme Court denied the Federal EPA’s motion to hold briefing in abeyance pending further Federal EPA actions on the rule and the appeal on the jurisdictional issue continues.

In March 2017, the Federal EPA published a notice of intentwill actually finalize further revisions, but will continue to review the rulemonitor this issue and provide an advanced notice of a proposedwill participate in further rulemaking consistent with the Executive Order of the President of the United States directingactivities as they arise.

In January 2023, the Federal EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review and rescind or revise the rule. In June 2017, the agencies signedfinalized a notice of proposednew rule to rescindrevising the definition of “waters of the United States” that was adoptedStates,” which became effective in June 2015, and to re-codifyMarch 2023. The new rule expands the scope of the definition, which means that permits may be necessary where none were previously required and issued permits may need to be reopened to impose additional obligations. A number of legal challenges in courts across the country have resulted in the rule being stayed in more than half of the states. Management is evaluating what impacts the revised rule will have on operations.

In May 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision that phrasesignificantly narrowed the scope of “waters of the United States,” specifically which wetlands can be regulated as it existed immediately priorwaters of the United States. In response, the Biden administration has announced plans to that action. This action would effectively retain the status quo untilexpeditiously issue a new rule defining “waters of the United States” consistent with the court decision. Management will monitor developments related to such rulemaking.

Impact of Environmental Regulation on Coal-Fired Generation

Compliance with extensive environmental regulations requires significant capital investment in environmental monitoring, installation of pollution control equipment, emission fees, disposal, remediation and permits. Management continuously evaluates cost estimates of complying with these regulations which may result in a decision to retire coal-fired generating facilities earlier than their currently estimated useful lives.

The table below summarizes the net book value, as of June 30, 2023, of generating facilities retired or planned for early retirement in advance of the retirement date currently authorized for ratemaking purposes:
CompanyPlantNet
Investment (a)
Accelerated Depreciation Regulatory AssetActual/Projected
Retirement
Date
Current Authorized
Recovery
Period
Annual Depreciation (b)
(in millions)(in millions)
PSONortheastern Plant, Unit 3$120.5 $154.9 2026(c)$14.9 
SWEPCoPirkey Plant— 111.8 (d)2023(e)— 
SWEPCoWelsh Plant, Units 1 and 3384.3 105.4 2028(f)(g)38.6 

(a)Net book value, including CWIP excluding cost of removal and materials and supplies.
(b)These amounts represent the amount of annual depreciation that has been collected from customers over the prior 12-month period.
(c)Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 is adopted bycurrently being recovered through 2040.
(d)Represents Arkansas and Texas jurisdictional share.
(e)As part of the agencies.2021 Arkansas Base Rate Case, the APSC granted SWEPCo regulatory asset treatment. SWEPCo will request recovery including a weighted average cost of capital carrying charge through a future proceeding. The Texas share of the Pirkey Plant will be addressed in SWEPCo’s next base rate case.

(f)In November 2020, management announced it will cease using coal at the Welsh Plant in 2028. Management is evaluating a potential conversion to natural gas after 2028 for both units.

(g)Welsh Plant, Unit 1 is being recovered through 2027 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2037 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions. Welsh Plant, Unit 3 is being recovered through 2032 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2042 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions.

Management is seeking or will seek regulatory recovery, as necessary, for any net book value remaining when the plants are retired. To the extent the net book value of these generation assets is not deemed recoverable, it could materially reduce future net income, cash flows and impact financial condition.
19


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


SEGMENTS


AEP’s primary business is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.  Within its Vertically Integrated Utilities segment, AEP centrally dispatches generation assets and manages its overall utility operations on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight.  Intersegment sales and transfers are generally based on underlying contractual arrangements and agreements.


AEP’s reportable segments and their related business activities are outlined below:


Vertically Integrated Utilities


Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.


Transmission and Distribution Utilities


Transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCoAEP Texas and AEP Texas.OPCo.
OPCo purchases energy and capacity at auction to serve SSOstandard service offer customers and provides transmission and distribution services for all connected load.
With the merger of TCC and TNC into AEP Utilities, Inc. to form AEP Texas, the Transmission and Distribution segment now includes certain activities related to the former AEP Utilities, Inc. that had been included in Corporate and Other.


AEP Transmission Holdco


Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in AEPTCo. These investments have FERC-approved returns on equity.ROEs.
Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in AEP’s transmission-only joint ventures. These investments have PUCT-approved or FERC-approved returns on equity.ROEs.


Generation & Marketing


Competitive generation in ERCOTContracted renewable energy investments and PJM.management services.
Marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, MISO, PJM SPP and MISO.SPP.
Contracted renewable energy investments and management services.Competitive generation in PJM.


The remainder of AEP’s activities isare presented as Corporate and Other. While not considered a reportable segment, Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries, Parent’s guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense, and other nonallocated costs.


The following discussion of AEP’s results of operations by operating segment includes an analysis of Gross Margin, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. Gross Margin includes Total Revenues less the costs of Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation, as well as Purchased Electricity for Resale, Generation Deferrals and Amortization of Generation Deferrals as presented in the RegistrantsRegistrants’ statements of income as applicable. Under the various state utility rate making processes, these expenses are generally reimbursable directly from and billed to customers. As a result, they do not typically impact Operating Income or Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders. Management believes that Gross Margin provides a useful measure for investors and other financial statement users to analyze AEP’s financial performance in that it excludes the effect on Total Revenues caused by volatility in these expenses. Operating income,Income, which is presented in accordance with GAAP in AEP’s statements of income, is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to the presentation of Gross Margin. AEP’s definition of Gross Margin may not be directly comparable to similarly titled financial measures used by other companies.


20



The following table presentstables present Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders by segment:
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities$278.1 $301.2 $539.1 $599.4 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities176.7 164.8 302.4 317.6 
AEP Transmission Holdco196.4 141.8 377.9 314.9 
Generation & Marketing(32.3)72.6 (190.0)186.8 
Corporate and Other(97.7)(155.9)(111.2)(179.5)
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$521.2 $524.5 $918.2 $1,239.2 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & Marketing
(in millions)
Revenues$2,674.5 $1,340.2 $458.6 $331.4 
Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other875.3 279.0 — 327.1 
Gross Margin1,799.2 1,061.2 458.6 4.3 
Other Operation and Maintenance819.1 439.7 33.9 56.2 
Depreciation and Amortization457.1 183.1 98.5 8.2 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes126.5 159.0 69.7 1.7 
Operating Income (Loss)396.5 279.4 256.5 (61.8)
Other Income7.1 0.8 3.0 11.7 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction9.7 8.2 23.1 — 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost31.5 14.0 1.5 6.5 
Interest Expense(195.1)(88.1)(52.9)(26.2)
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) and Equity Earnings (Loss)249.7 214.3 231.2 (69.8)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(28.3)37.6 55.3 (33.0)
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary0.4 — 21.4 (1.8)
Net Income (Loss)278.4 176.7 197.3 (38.6)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests0.3 — 0.9 (6.3)
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$278.1 $176.7 $196.4 $(32.3)

21


 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities$286.3
 $342.3
 $626.6
 $829.3
Transmission and Distribution Utilities144.0
 155.7
 374.3
 387.8
AEP Transmission Holdco75.5
 69.0
 275.7
 207.5
Generation & Marketing33.7
 (1,369.2) 246.3
 (1,248.8)
Corporate and Other5.2
 36.4
 (11.0) 61.7
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$544.7
 $(765.8) $1,511.9
 $237.5
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & Marketing
 (in millions)
Revenues$2,648.5 $1,301.6 $378.8 $659.6 
Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other837.8 252.7 — 519.8 
Gross Margin1,810.7 1,048.9 378.8 139.8 
Other Operation and Maintenance779.9 441.1 36.2 (6.0)
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights— — — (116.3)
Depreciation and Amortization504.4 187.6 87.9 22.4 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes128.6 163.8 70.1 3.1 
Operating Income397.8 256.4 184.6 236.6 
Other Income10.7 2.0 0.3 6.8 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction6.3 7.0 15.3 — 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost27.4 11.9 1.2 5.2 
Interest Expense(157.3)(82.0)(40.7)(9.0)
Income Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) and Equity Earnings (Loss)284.9 195.3 160.7 239.6 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(18.0)31.3 39.4 (13.5)
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary0.4 0.8 21.4 (187.2)
Net Income303.3 164.8 142.7 65.9 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests2.1 — 0.9 (6.7)
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$301.2 $164.8 $141.8 $72.6 


AEP CONSOLIDATED

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & Marketing
(in millions)
Revenues$5,532.3 $2,804.4 $914.1 $658.4 
Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other1,851.5 671.7 — 709.4 
Gross Margin3,680.8 2,132.7 914.1 (51.0)
Other Operation and Maintenance1,651.3 931.6 70.6 99.2 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio— — — 112.0 
Depreciation and Amortization930.6 369.3 196.0 26.4 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes258.9 337.8 146.5 4.5 
Operating Income (Loss)840.0 494.0 501.0 (293.1)
Other Income14.3 1.3 4.9 20.7 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction15.5 17.3 39.5 — 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost63.3 28.0 3.1 13.1 
Interest Expense(368.0)(176.2)(100.1)(50.5)
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) and Equity Earnings565.1 364.4 448.4 (309.8)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)25.2 62.0 107.6 (111.1)
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiary0.7 — 38.9 3.7 
Net Income (Loss)540.6 302.4 379.7 (195.0)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests1.5 — 1.8 (5.0)
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$539.1 $302.4 $377.9 $(190.0)
Third Quarter of 2017 Compared to Third Quarter of 2016

22


Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders increased from a loss of $766 million in 2016 to income of $545 million in 2017 primarily due to:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & Marketing
 (in millions)
Revenues$5,335.9 $2,548.4 $790.2 $1,278.9 
Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other1,703.9 485.3 — 967.9 
Gross Margin3,632.0 2,063.1 790.2 311.0 
Other Operation and Maintenance1,549.1 869.6 67.9 26.5 
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights— — — (116.3)
Depreciation and Amortization1,004.4 371.2 173.2 45.7 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes253.8 328.2 137.4 6.2 
Operating Income824.7 494.1 411.7 348.9 
Other Income15.9 2.3 0.4 8.9 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction14.4 14.3 30.9 — 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost55.0 23.8 2.5 10.3 
Interest Expense(308.3)(156.8)(79.8)(14.0)
Income Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) and Equity Earnings (Loss)601.7 377.7 365.7 354.1 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)(0.1)60.9 89.8 (20.2)
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary0.7 0.8 40.5 (192.4)
Net Income602.5 317.6 316.4 181.9 
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests3.1 — 1.5 (4.9)
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$599.4 $317.6 $314.9 $186.8 


An increase due to the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.
23
An increase in transmission investment primarily at AEP Transmission Holdco which resulted in higher revenues and income.



These increases were partially offset by:

A decrease in generation revenues associated with the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
A decrease in weather-related usage.
The prior year reversal of income tax expense for an unrealized capital loss valuation allowance. AEP effectively settled a 2011 audit issue with the IRS resulting in a change in the valuation allowance.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders increased from income of $238 million in 2016 to income of $1.5 billion in 2017 primarily due to:

An increase due to the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.
An increase due to the current year gain on the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
An increase in transmission investment primarily at AEP Transmission Holdco which resulted in higher revenues and income.
Favorable rate proceedings in AEP’s various jurisdictions.

These increases were partially offset by:

A decrease in generation revenues associated with the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
A decrease in weather-related usage.
A decrease in weather-normalized sales.
A decrease in FERC wholesale municipal and cooperative revenues.
The prior year reversal of income tax expense for an unrealized capital loss valuation allowance. AEP effectively settled a 2011 audit issue with the IRS resulting in a change in the valuation allowance.

AEP’s results of operations by operating segment are discussed below.


VERTICALLY INTEGRATED UTILITIES
  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Vertically Integrated Utilities 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Revenues $2,482.2
 $2,556.3
 $6,893.1
 $6,927.8
Fuel and Purchased Electricity 868.6
 858.3
 2,368.9
 2,299.8
Gross Margin 1,613.6
 1,698.0
 4,524.2
 4,628.0
Other Operation and Maintenance 659.1
 673.0
 2,024.5
 1,926.9
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 
 10.5
 
 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization 288.8
 277.7
 845.1
 815.5
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 105.7
 99.0
 306.2
 295.0
Operating Income 560.0
 637.8
 1,348.4
 1,580.1
Interest and Investment Income 1.3
 0.8
 5.4
 2.4
Carrying Costs Income 2.1
 0.8
 11.3
 8.1
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 7.5
 10.0
 20.0
 35.4
Interest Expense (134.9) (136.7) (406.5) (399.9)
Income Before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings (Loss) 436.0
 512.7
 978.6
 1,226.1
Income Tax Expense 139.1
 172.0
 334.9
 398.4
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries 0.4
 2.7
 (4.5) 4.9
Net Income 297.3
 343.4
 639.2
 832.6
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 11.0
 1.1
 12.6
 3.3
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders $286.3
 $342.3
 $626.6
 $829.3


Summary of KWh Energy Sales for Vertically Integrated Utilities
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential6,332 7,039 14,431 16,264 
Commercial5,723 5,911 11,095 11,429 
Industrial8,660 8,906 16,955 17,068 
Miscellaneous545 578 1,066 1,122 
Total Retail21,260 22,434 43,547 45,883 
Wholesale (a)3,484 3,660 6,744 8,134 
Total KWhs24,744 26,094 50,291 54,017 
 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential8,488
 9,575
 23,226
 25,373
Commercial6,701
 7,137
 18,386
 19,207
Industrial8,839
 8,655
 25,792
 25,576
Miscellaneous603
 634
 1,701
 1,740
Total Retail24,631
 26,001
 69,105
 71,896
        
Wholesale (a)6,837
 6,765
 19,262
 17,253
        
Total KWhs31,468
 32,766
 88,367
 89,149
(a)Includes off-system sales, municipalities and cooperatives, unit power and other wholesale customers.




(a)Includes Off-system Sales, municipalities and cooperatives, unit power and other wholesale customers.
Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.  In general, degree day changes in the eastern region have a larger effect on revenues than changes in the western region due to the relative size of the two regions and the number of customers within each region.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days for Vertically Integrated Utilities
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Eastern Region    
Actual Heating (a)
122 152 1,253 1,742 
Normal Heating (b)
139 140 1,747 1,744 
Actual Cooling (c)
214 393 219 395 
Normal Cooling (b)
340 333 344 337 
Western Region    
Actual Heating (a)
20 15 657 930 
Normal Heating (b)
35 35 916 906 
Actual Cooling (c)
744 885 802 905 
Normal Cooling (b)
704 693 732 721 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.

24


 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Eastern Region 
  
  
  
Actual  Heating (a)

 
 1,266
 1,684
Normal  Heating (b)
4
 5
 1,757
 1,775
        
Actual  Cooling (c)
698
 954
 1,034
 1,306
Normal  Cooling (b)
731
 726
 1,060
 1,058
        
Western Region 
  
  
  
Actual  Heating (a)

 
 539
 685
Normal  Heating (b)
1
 1
 926
 927
        
Actual  Cooling (c)
1,281
 1,519
 2,000
 2,262
Normal  Cooling (b)
1,404
 1,400
 2,124
 2,116
Vertically Integrated Utilities
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
(in millions)
 
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$301.2 $599.4 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins(20.0)16.5 
Margins from Off-system Sales20.6 47.1 
Transmission Revenues(10.6)(6.1)
Other Revenues(1.5)(8.7)
Total Change in Gross Margin(11.5)48.8 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance(39.2)(102.2)
Depreciation and Amortization47.3 73.8 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes2.1 (5.1)
Other Income(3.6)(1.6)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction3.4 1.1 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost4.1 8.3 
Interest Expense(37.8)(59.7)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(23.7)(85.4)
  
Income Tax Expense10.3 (25.3)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests1.8 1.6 
2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$278.1 $539.1 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.





ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Vertically Integrated Utilities
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $342.3
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (74.1)
Off-system Sales (0.8)
Transmission Revenues (7.6)
Other Revenues (1.9)
Total Change in Gross Margin (84.4)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 13.9
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization (11.1)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (6.7)
Interest and Investment Income 0.5
Carrying Costs Income 1.3
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (2.5)
Interest Expense 1.8
Total Change in Expenses and Other 7.7
   
Income Tax Expense 32.9
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary (2.3)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest (9.9)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $286.3


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $74$20 million primarily due to the following:
An $80A $55 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily in the easternresidential class.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $14 million increase at APCo due to a base rate increase in Virginia implemented in October 2022 following the Virginia Supreme Court remand. This increase was partially offset in Other Operation and western regions.Maintenance expenses below.
The effectA $14 million increase at SWEPCo due to base rate revenue increases in Arkansas and Louisiana and rider increases in all retail jurisdictions. These increases were partially offset in other expense items below.
A $12 million increase due to lower customer refunds related to Tax Reform. This increase was offset in Income Tax Expense below.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $21 million primarily due to Rockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations activity.
Transmission Revenues decreased $11 million primarily due to transmission formula rate true-up activity.


25


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Benefit changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $39 million primarily due to the following:
A $14 million increase at APCo due to gains from the sale of rate proceedingsland in AEP’s service territories which included:2022.
A $17$10 million increase in accounts receivable factoring expenses primarily due to increased interest rates.
A $9 million increase in generation expenses primarily due to plant outages and maintenance at I&M.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $47 millionprimarily due to a $55 million decrease for PSOat AEGCo and I&M primarily due to the expiration of the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease in December 2022, partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense due to the acquisition of Rockport Plant, Unit 2 at the end of the lease.
Interest Expense increased $38 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and interest rates implementedprimarily at APCo, I&M, KPCo, PSO and WPCo.
Income Tax Benefit increased $10 million primarily due to the following:
A $15 million increase in 2016 associated with interim rates.PTCs. This increase was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
A $6$7 million decrease primarilyincrease due to a decrease in rates in West Virginia and Virginia.
For the rate decreases described above, $4 million relate to riders/trackers which have corresponding decreases in expense items below.
These decreases were partially offset by:
The effect of rate proceedings in AEP’s service territories which included:
An $11 million increase from rate proceedings in the Indiana service territory.
An $11 million increase primarily due to rider revenue increases in Louisiana, partially offset in expense items below.
For the rate increases described above, $8 millionrelate to riders/trackers which have corresponding increases in expense items below.
An $11 million increase in weather-normalized margins.
A $4 million increase primarily due to reduced fuel and other variable production costs not recovered through fuel clauses or other trackers.



Transmission Revenues decreased $8 million primarily due to the following:
A $6 million decrease primarily due to I&M’s annual formula rate true-up and reduced net PJM Network Integration Transmission Service revenues resulting from increased affiliated transmission-related charges.
A $5 million decrease due to a net favorable accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgrades in third quarter 2016.

Expenses and Other, Income Tax Expense and Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $14 million primarily due to the following:
A $15 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
A $10 million decrease in PJM and SPP transmission services expense not recovered through riders/trackers.
A $6 million decrease in storm expenses, primarily in the APCo region.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $5 million increase due to the Wind Catcher Project for PSO and SWEPCo.
A $5 million increase in nuclear expenses at Cook Plant.
A $3 million increase in vegetation management expenses, primarily at PSO and SWEPCo.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $11 million due to the impairment of I&M’s Price River Coal reserves in 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $11 millionprimarily due to the following:
A $15 million increase primarily due to higher depreciable base.
A $6 million increase due to amortization of capitalized software costs.pretax book income.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $9An $8 million decrease primarily related to prior year higher estimated depreciation expense associated with interim rates at PSO.in amortization of Excess ADIT. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $7 million primarily due to higher property taxes.
Income TaxExpense decreased $33 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income and income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest increased $10 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This increase is offset by a decrease in Income Tax Expense.




NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Vertically Integrated Utilities
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $829.3
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (123.9)
Off-system Sales 7.4
Transmission Revenues 11.0
Other Revenues 1.7
Total Change in Gross Margin (103.8)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (97.6)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization (29.6)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (11.2)
Interest and Investment Income 3.0
Carrying Costs Income 3.2
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (15.4)
Interest Expense (6.6)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (143.7)
   
Income Tax Expense 63.5
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary (9.4)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest (9.3)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $626.6


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $124 increased $17 million primarily due to the following:
A $164$36 million decrease in weather-related usage in the eastern and western regions.
A $42 million decrease in FERC generation wholesale municipal and cooperative revenuesincrease at SWEPCo primarily due to an annual formulaa base rate true-uprevenue increase in Arkansas and adjustments at I&MLouisiana and SWEPCo.
The effect of rate proceedingsrider increases in AEP’s service territories which included:
A $14 million decrease primarily due to prior year recognition of deferred billing in West Virginia as approved by the WVPSC.
A $9 million net decrease for PSO primarily due to revenue decreases associated with interim base rates implemented in 2016.
For the rate decreases described above, $1 million relate to riders/trackers which have corresponding decreases in expense items below.
A $5 million decrease in weather-normalized margins.
all retail jurisdictions. These decreasesincreases were partially offset by:in other expense items below.
The effect of rate proceedings in AEP’s service territories which included:
A $42$34 million increase from rate proceedingsin weather-normalized retail margins primarily in the Indiana service territory.residential and commercial classes.
A $33$29 million increase at APCo due to rider revenue increasesa base rate increase in Louisiana, Texas and Arkansas, partially offsetVirginia implemented in expense items below.
A $6 million increase for KGPCo due to revenue increases from rate riders/trackers.
ForOctober 2022 following the rate increases described above, $37 million relate to riders/trackers which have corresponding increases in expense items below.


A $19 million increase primarily due to reduced fuel and other variable production costs not recovered through fuel clauses or other trackers.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $7 million primarily due to higher market prices.
Transmission Revenues increased $11 million primarily due the following:
A $35 million increase primarily due to increases in formula rates driven by continued investment in transmission assets.Virginia Supreme Court remand. This increase iswas partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
A $26 million increase due to lower customer refunds related to Tax Reform. This increase was offset in Income Tax Expense below.
A $21 million increase at I&M due to a reduction in provision for refund partially offset by lower wholesale true-ups.
An $18 million increase at PSO in base rate and rider revenues. This increase was partially offset in other expense items below.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $23$138 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily in the residential class.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $47 million primarily due to I&M’s annualRockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations activity and estimated PJM performance incentives for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations related to winter storm Elliott in December 2022.
Transmission Revenues decreased $6 million primarily due to transmission formula rate true-up and reduced net PJM Network Integration Transmission Service revenues resulting from increased affiliated transmission-related charges.activity.
A $5Other Revenues decreased $9 million net decreaseprimarily due to a net favorable accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgradesthe following:
A $4 million decrease at APCo primarily due to pole attachment revenue.
A $4 million decrease at I&M due to the sale of allowances. This decrease was partially offset in third quarter 2016.Retail Margins above.



26


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary and Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $98$102 million primarily due to the following:
A $103$27 million increase in recoverablegeneration expenses primarily PJM expensesdue to plant outages and energy efficiency expenses fully recovered in rate recovery riders/trackers within Gross Margin above.maintenance at I&M.
A $22$20 million increase in vegetation managementaccounts receivable factoring expenses primarily at PSO and I&M.due to increased interest rates.
A $6An $18 million increase in storm expenses primarily due to major storms at APCo and system restoration primarily at I&M and SWEPCo.
A $14 million increase at APCo due to gains from the sale of land in 2022.
A $14 million increase at APCo due to the amortization of the regulatory asset in accordance with the August 2022 Virginia Supreme Court opinion related to under-earnings during the 2017-2019 Triennial Review. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
An $11 million increase in distribution expenses.
A $9 million increase at I&M due to a favorable land saledecreased Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited distribution in 2016 in the APCo region.2023.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $27$29 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
Asset ImpairmentsDepreciation and Other Related ChargesAmortization expenses decreased $11$74 millionprimarily due to a $93 million decrease at AEGCo and I&M primarily due to the expiration of the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease in December 2022, partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense due to the acquisition of Rockport Plant, Unit 2 at the end of the lease.
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost decreased $8 million primarily due to additional loss amortization as the impairmentresult of I&M’s Price River Coal reserves in 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $30 millionprimarily due to the following:
A $46 million increase primarilyunfavorable asset returns during 2022, higher interest costs due to higher depreciable base.discount rates and the expiration of prior service credits from previous plan changes.
A $15 million increase due to amortization of capitalized software costs.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $24 million decrease primarily related to prior year higher estimated depreciation expense associated with interim rates at PSO.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $11 million primarily due to higher property taxes.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $15 millionprimarily due to completed environmental projects.
Interest Expense increased $7$60 million primarily due to the following:
A $7 million increase due to lower AFUDC borrowed funds resulting from completed environmental projects.
A $7 million increase primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and interest rates primarily at APCo, I&M.&M, KPCo, PSO and WPCo.
These increases wereIncome Tax Expense increased $25 million primarily due to the following:
A $35 million decrease in amortization of Excess ADIT. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $4$13 million decrease primarily due to the deferral of the debt component of carrying charges on environmental control costs at PSO.
Income TaxExpense decreased $64 million primarily due to a decreaseincrease in pretax book income and income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine,PTCs. This increase was partially offset by the recording of favorable state and federal income tax adjustments in 2016.Retail Margins above.

27

Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary decreased $9 million primarily due to a prior period income tax adjustment for DHLC, a SWEPCo unconsolidated subsidiary.

Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest increased $9 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This increase is offset by a decrease in Income Tax Expense.




TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES
  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Transmission and Distribution Utilities 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Revenues $1,173.3
 $1,275.6
 $3,313.2
 $3,468.5
Purchased Electricity 215.7
 253.6
 626.0
 662.2
Amortization of Generation Deferrals 58.7
 66.1
 172.9
 173.0
Gross Margin 898.9
 955.9
 2,514.3
 2,633.3
Other Operation and Maintenance 303.2
 358.2
 882.5
 1,009.5
Depreciation and Amortization 182.3
 181.4
 502.4
 505.0
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 133.6
 132.0
 387.1
 373.0
Operating Income 279.8
 284.3
 742.3
 745.8
Interest and Investment Income 1.2
 1.5
 5.6
 5.5
Carrying Costs Income 0.5
 0.9
 3.0
 4.0
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.9
 2.2
 6.3
 10.6
Interest Expense (61.0) (63.2) (182.5) (196.0)
Income Before Income Tax Expense 221.4
 225.7
 574.7
 569.9
Income Tax Expense 77.4
 70.0
 200.4
 182.1
Net Income 144.0
 155.7
 374.3
 387.8
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 
 
 
 
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders $144.0
 $155.7
 $374.3
 $387.8


Summary of KWh Energy Sales for Transmission and Distribution Utilities
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential5,910 6,589 12,176 13,566 
Commercial7,393 6,941 14,137 12,940 
Industrial6,673 6,647 13,199 12,577 
Miscellaneous177 197 345 368 
Total Retail (a)20,153 20,374 39,857 39,451 
Wholesale (b)428 565 881 1,136 
Total KWhs20,581 20,939 40,738 40,587 
 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential7,511
 8,325
 19,361
 20,575
Commercial6,941
 7,287
 19,184
 19,676
Industrial5,575
 5,518
 16,992
 16,522
Miscellaneous185
 187
 516
 528
Total Retail (a)20,212
 21,317
 56,053
 57,301
        
Wholesale (b)585
 654
 1,749
 1,389
        
Total KWhs20,797
 21,971
 57,802
 58,690


(a)Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.
(b)Primarily Ohio’s contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold into PJM.

(a)Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.

(b)Primarily Ohio’s contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold to PJM.


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.  In general, degree day changes in the eastern region have a larger effect on revenues than changes in the western region due to the relative size of the two regions and the number of customers within each region.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days for Transmission and Distribution Utilities
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Eastern Region    
Actual Heating (a)
177 206 1,521 2,070 
Normal Heating (b)
185 186 2,076 2,072 
Actual Cooling (c)
184 359 184 360 
Normal Cooling (b)
305 298 308 301 
Western Region    
Actual Heating (a)
— 143 278 
Normal Heating (b)
197 193 
Actual Cooling (d)
955 1,135 1,226 1,223 
Normal Cooling (b)
940 925 1,067 1,051 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
(d)Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 70 degree temperature base.
28


 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Eastern Region 
  
  
  
Actual  Heating (a)

 
 1,500
 1,929
Normal  Heating (b)
6
 7
 2,091
 2,110
        
Actual  Cooling (c)
642
 900
 957
 1,209
Normal  Cooling (b)
670
 664
 960
 956
        
Western Region 
  
  
  
Actual  Heating (a)

 
 103
 123
Normal  Heating (b)

 
 199
 198
        
Actual  Cooling (d)
1,393
 1,534
 2,640
 2,619
Normal  Cooling (b)
1,364
 1,358
 2,396
 2,384
Transmission and Distribution Utilities
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
(in millions)
  
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$164.8 $317.6 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins(23.2)(1.2)
Margins from Off-system Sales17.3 41.4 
Transmission Revenues21.4 33.7 
Other Revenues(3.2)(4.3)
Total Change in Gross Margin12.3 69.6 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance1.4 (62.0)
Depreciation and Amortization4.5 1.9 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes4.8 (9.6)
Other Income(1.2)(1.0)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction1.2 3.0 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost2.1 4.2 
Interest Expense(6.1)(19.4)
Total Change in Expenses and Other6.7 (82.9)
  
Income Tax Expense(6.3)(1.1)
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiary(0.8)(0.8)
  
2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$176.7 $302.4 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Eastern Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
(d)Western Region cooling degree days are calculated on a 70 degree temperature base.




ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission and Distribution Utilities
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $155.7
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (58.7)
Off-system Sales (11.6)
Transmission Revenues 7.6
Other Revenues 5.7
Total Change in Gross Margin (57.0)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 55.0
Depreciation and Amortization (0.9)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (1.6)
Interest and Investment Income (0.3)
Carrying Costs Income (0.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.3)
Interest Expense 2.2
Total Change in Expenses and Other 52.7
   
Income Tax Expense (7.4)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $144.0


The major components of the decreasechange in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $59$23 million primarily due to the following:
A $52 million decrease in Ohio revenues associated with the Universal Service Fund (USF) surcharge rate decrease. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operating and Maintenance expenses below.
An $18 million net decrease in recovery of equity carrying charges related to the Ohio Phase-In Recovery Rider (PIRR), net of associated amortizations.
An $8 million decrease in revenues associated with smart grid riders in Ohio. This decrease was offset in expense items below.
A $7$21 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 49% and 16% decrease in Texas.cooling degree days in Ohio and Texas, respectively.
A $5$19 million decrease in state excise taxesrevenue from rate riders primarily due to a decreasehistorical period over recovery in metered KWh in Ohio.Texas. This decrease was partially offset by a correspondingin Other Operations and Maintenance expenses below.
An $18 million decrease in Taxes Other Than Income Taxes below.weather-normalized revenues in all retail classes.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $19 million net increase in Basic Transmission Cost Rider revenues and recoverable PJM expenses in Ohio. This increase was partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
A $14 million increase due to various rider revenues in AEP Texas revenues associated with the Distribution Cost Recovery Factor revenue rider.Ohio. This increase was partially offset in Margins from Off-system Sales and other expense items below.
A $12Margins from Off-system Sales increased $17 million favorable impact in Ohioprimarily due to the recovery of losses from a power contract with OVEC. The PUCO approved a PPA rider beginningfollowing:
A $51 million increase in January 2017 to recover any net margin related to the deferraldeferrals of OVEC losses starting in June 2016.costs. This increase was offset by a corresponding decrease in Margins from Off-System Sales below.
Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $12 million due to current year losses from a power contract with OVEC which is deferred in Retail Margins above as a result of theabove.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $33 million decrease in off-system sales at OVEC PPA rider beginningdue to lower market prices and volume. This decrease was offset in January 2017.Retail Margins above.
29


Transmission Revenues increased $8$21 million primarily due to recovery ofthe following:
A $14 million increase due to increased load in Texas.
A $6 million increase in interim rates driven by increased transmission investmentinvestments in ERCOT.
Texas.
Other Revenues increased $6 million primarily due to an increase in Texas securitization revenue, offset in other expense items below.



Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $55$1 million primarily due to the following:
A $52$28 million decrease due to legislation passed in Texas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
An $18 million decrease in remitted USF surcharge paymentsERCOT transmission expenses. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
A $5 million decrease in employee-related expenses in Ohio.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $19 million increase related to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This decreaseincrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.
An $18 million increase in Ohio transmission expenses primarily due to:
A $5$15 million increase in transmission formula rate true-up activity.
A $12 million increase in recoverable PJM expense. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $6 million decrease in employee-related expenses.vegetation management expenses in Ohio.
A $3$6 million increase in recoverable distribution expenses primarily related to vegetation management in Ohio. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $5 million primarily due to the following:
A $13 million decrease in recoverable smart gridDistribution Investment Rider depreciable expenses in Ohio. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $6 million increase in storm expenses, primarily in the Texas region.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $1 million primarily due to the following:
An $11 million increase primarily due to securitization amortizations related to transition funding, offset in Other Revenues above.
A $2 million increase due to amortization of capitalized software costs.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $5 million decrease in recoverable DIR depreciation expense in Ohio.
A $4 million decrease in amortization expenses for the collection of carrying costs on Ohio deferred capacity charges beginning June 2015.
A $4 million decrease in recoverable smart grid rider depreciation expenses in Ohio. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $2 million primarily due to the following:
A $7 million increase in property taxes due to additional investments in transmission and distribution assets and higher tax rates.
This increasedecrease was partially offset by:
A $5An $8 million decreaseincrease in state excise taxesdepreciation expense primarily due to a decreasean increase in metered KWhdepreciable base in Ohio.
Interest Expense decreased $2 increased $6 million primarily due to a decreasehigher long-term debt balances and higher interest rates in the Texas securitization transition assets as a result of the final maturity of the first Texas securitization bond. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Revenues above.
Texas.
Income TaxExpense increased $7$6 million primarily due to the recording of favorable federalan increase in pretax book income tax adjustments in 2016 and other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis.
Texas.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Transmission and Distribution Utilities
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $387.8
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (123.0)
Off-system Sales (26.8)
Transmission Revenues 24.2
Other Revenues 6.6
Total Change in Gross Margin (119.0)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 127.0
Depreciation and Amortization 2.6
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (14.1)
Interest and Investment Income 0.1
Carrying Costs Income (1.0)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (4.3)
Interest Expense 13.5
Total Change in Expenses and Other 123.8
   
Income Tax Expense (18.3)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $374.3


The major components of the decreasechange in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $123$1 million primarily due to the following:
A $140$46 million decrease in Ohio revenues associated with the USF surcharge rate decrease. This decrease was offset byweather-related usage due to a corresponding26% and 49% decrease in Other Operatingheating degree days in Ohio and Maintenance expenses below.Texas, respectively, and a 49% decrease in cooling degree days in Ohio.
A $14$24 million decrease in weather-normalized margins, primarilyrevenues in the residential class.
A $21 million decrease due to a prior year reversal of a regulatory provision resulting from a favorable court decisionall retail classes in Ohio.
A $13 million decrease in revenues associated with smart grid riders in Ohio. This decrease was offset in expense items below.
A $9 million net decrease in recovery of equity carrying charges related to the PIRR, net of associated amortizations.
A $7 million decrease in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh in Ohio. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Taxes Other Than Income Taxes.Texas.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $46$43 million favorable impact in Ohioincrease due to the recovery of losses from a power contract with OVEC. The PUCO approved a PPAvarious rider beginningrevenues in January 2017 to recover any net margin related to the deferral of OVEC losses starting in June 2016.Ohio. This increase was partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Margins from Off-SystemOff-system Sales, Other Revenues and other expense items below.
A $40$34 million net increase in AEP TexasBasic Transmission Cost Rider revenues associated with the Distribution Cost Recovery Factor revenue rider.
A $6 million increase in rider revenues associated with the DIR.and recoverable PJM expenses. This increase iswas partially offset in other expense itemsOther Operation and Maintenance expenses below.


Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $27 increased $41 million primarily due to the following:
An $84 million increase in deferrals of OVEC costs. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $46$43 million decrease in Ohiooff-system sales at OVEC due to current year losses from a power contract with OVEC, which is deferredlower market prices and volume. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above as a result ofand Other Revenues below.
Transmission Revenues increased $34 million primarily due to the OVEC PPA rider beginning in January 2017.following:
This decrease was partially offset by:
An $18 million increase in Ohio primarilyinterim rates driven by increased transmission investments in Texas.
A $14 million increase due to the impact of prior year losses from a power contract with OVEC which was not includedincreased load in the OVEC PPA rider.Texas.
Transmission Revenues increased $24 million primarily due to recovery of increased transmission investment in ERCOT.
30

Other Revenues increased $7 million primarily due to an increase in Texas securitization revenue, offset in other expense items below.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $127increased $62 million primarily due to the following:
A $140$48 million decrease in remitted USF surcharge paymentsincrease related to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This decreaseincrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.
A $10$23 million increase in transmission expenses in Ohio primarily due to:
A $17 million increase in recoverable PJM expenses. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
A $16 million increase in transmission formula rate true-up activity.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $7 million decrease in vegetation management expenses in Ohio.
An $11 million increase in distribution-related expenses in Texas.
An $8 million increase in recoverable distribution expenses related to vegetation management in Ohio. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $28 million decrease due to legislation passed in Texas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
A $14 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
These decreases were partiallyA $4 million decrease in ERCOT transmission expenses in Texas. This increase was offset by:in Retail Revenues above.
A $12 million increase in PJM expenses related to the annual formula rate true-up that will be recovered in future periods.
A $6 million increase in storm expenses, primarily in the Texas region.
A $5 million increase in vegetation management expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $3$2 million primarily due to the following:
An $11 million decrease in amortization expenses for the collection of carrying costs on Ohio deferred capacity charges beginning June 2015.
An $8 million decrease due to recoveries of transmission cost rider carrying costs in Ohio. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
A $7$21 million decrease in recoverable DIR depreciation expense in Ohio.
A $5 million decrease in recoverable smart grid rider depreciationDistribution Investment Rider depreciable expenses in Ohio. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
These decreases wereThis decrease was partially offset by:
A $16 million increase due to securitization amortizations related to transition funding, offset in Other Revenues above.
A $9$13 million increase in depreciation expense primarily due to an increase in depreciable base of transmission and distribution assets.in Ohio.
A $6 million increase due to amortization of capitalized software costs.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $14$10 million primarily due to higher property taxes driven by increased distribution and transmission investment in Texas.
Interest Expense increased $19 million primarily due to the following:
A $20 million increase in property taxes due to additional investments in transmission and distribution assetshigher long-term debt balances and higher tax rates.
This increase were partially offset by:
A $7 million decreaseinterest rates in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh in Ohio.Texas.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $4 millionprimarily due to larger short-term debt balances.
31

Interest Expense decreased $14 million primarily due to the following:

A $9 million decrease due to the maturity of a senior unsecured note in June 2016 in Ohio.
A $7 million decrease in the Texas securitization transition assets due to the final maturity of the first Texas securitization bond. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Revenues above.
Income TaxExpense increased $18 million primarily due to the recording of favorable state and federal income tax adjustments in 2016 and other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis.


AEP TRANSMISSION HOLDCO
  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
AEP Transmission Holdco 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Transmission Revenues $178.5
 $132.4
 $581.9
 $382.7
Other Operation and Maintenance 23.1
 12.2
 54.5
 32.7
Depreciation and Amortization 26.1
 17.1
 74.7
 48.4
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 28.6
 22.7
 85.0
 65.7
Operating Income 100.7
 80.4
 367.7
 235.9
Interest and Investment Income 0.1
 
 0.5
 
Carrying Costs Expense 
 
 (0.1) (0.2)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 11.6
 13.5
 35.9
 39.8
Interest Expense (17.9) (12.2) (52.3) (35.4)
Income Before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings 94.5
 81.7
 351.7
 240.1
Income Tax Expense 38.6
 35.2
 142.1
 103.2
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries 20.6
 23.0
 68.7
 72.6
Net Income 76.5
 69.5
 278.3
 209.5
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 1.0
 0.5
 2.6
 2.0
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders $75.5
 $69.0
 $275.7
 $207.5

Summary of Investment in Transmission Assets for AEP Transmission Holdco
June 30,
20232022
(in millions)
Plant in Service$13,674.6 $12,234.0 
Construction Work in Progress2,049.0 1,794.6 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization1,189.3 933.1 
Total Transmission Property, Net$14,534.3 $13,095.5 
  September 30,
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
Plant in Service $5,001.4
 $3,330.5
CWIP 1,392.8
 1,565.8
Accumulated Depreciation 156.6
 88.1
Total Transmission Property, Net $6,237.6
 $4,808.2


AEP Transmission Holdco
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$141.8 $314.9 
Changes in Transmission Revenues:
Transmission Revenues79.8 123.9 
Total Change in Transmission Revenues79.8 123.9 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
Other Operation and Maintenance2.3 (2.7)
Depreciation and Amortization(10.6)(22.8)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes0.4 (9.1)
Interest and Investment Income2.7 4.5 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction7.8 8.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost0.3 0.6 
Interest Expense(12.2)(20.3)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(9.3)(41.2)
Income Tax Expense(15.9)(17.8)
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiary— (1.6)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests— (0.3)
2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$196.4 $377.9 


ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from AEP Transmission Holdco
(in millions)
Third Quarter of 2016 $69.0
   
Changes in Transmission Revenues:  
Transmission Revenues 46.1
Total Change in Transmission Revenues 46.1
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (10.9)
Depreciation and Amortization (9.0)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (5.9)
Interest and Investment Income 0.1
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.9)
Interest Expense (5.7)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (33.3)
   
Income Tax Expense (3.4)
Equity Earnings (2.4)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests (0.5)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $75.5


The major componentscomponent of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliates, werenonaffiliates, was as follows:


Transmission Revenuesincreased $46$80 million primarily due to anthe following:
A $41 million increase in formula rates driven bydue to continued investment in transmission assets.
A $33 million increase due to affiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expense across the other Registrant Subsidiaries.
A $6 million increase due to nonaffiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity.


32



Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other OperationDepreciation and MaintenanceAmortization expenses increased $11 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Constructionincreased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $9$8 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
AFUDC rates and CWIP.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $6 million primarily due to increased property taxes as a result of additional transmission investment.
Interest Expenseincreased $6$12 million primarily due to higher outstanding long-term debt balances.
balances and interest rates.
Income Tax Expenseincreased $3$16 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from AEP Transmission Holdco
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $207.5
   
Changes in Transmission Revenues:  
Transmission Revenues 199.2
Total Change in Transmission Revenues 199.2
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (21.8)
Depreciation and Amortization (26.3)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (19.3)
Interest and Investment Income 0.5
Carrying Costs Expense 0.1
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (3.9)
Interest Expense (16.9)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (87.6)
   
Income Tax Expense (38.9)
Equity Earnings (3.9)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests (0.6)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $275.7


The major componentscomponent of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliates, werenonaffiliates, was as follows:

Transmission Revenues increased $199$124 million primarily due to the current year favorable impact of the modification of the PJM OATT formula rates combined with anfollowing:
An $85 million increase driven bydue to continued investment in transmission assets.

A $33 million increase due to affiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expense across the other Registrant Subsidiaries.
A $6 million increase due to nonaffiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity.
Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings changed between years as follows:

Other OperationDepreciation and MaintenanceAmortization expenses increased $22$23 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxesincreased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $26$9 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $19 million primarily due to increased property taxes as a result of additionalincreased transmission investment.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $4 million primarily due to the FERC transmission complaint and an increase in the amount of short-term debt, offset by an increase in the CWIP balance.
Interest Expense increased $17$9 million primarily due to higher outstandingAFUDC rates and CWIP.
Interest Expense increased $20 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances.
balances and interest rates.
Income Tax Expenseincreased $39$18 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.


33

Equity Earnings decreased $4 million primarily due to lower earnings at ETT resulting from increased property taxes, depreciation expense, and decreased AFUDC, partially offset by increased revenues. The revenue increase is primarily due to interim rate increases in the third quarter of 2016 and higher loads, partially offset by an ETT rate reduction that went into effect in March 2017.




GENERATION & MARKETING

  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
Generation & Marketing 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Revenues $465.5
 $859.4
 $1,467.5
 $2,291.2
Fuel, Purchased Electricity and Other 354.6
 567.4
 1,062.7
 1,490.6
Gross Margin 110.9
 292.0
 404.8
 800.6
Other Operation and Maintenance 56.5
 95.8
 211.4
 290.2
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges (2.5) 2,254.4
 10.6
 2,254.4
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets 
 
 (226.4) 
Depreciation and Amortization 6.2
 50.5
 17.5
 149.8
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 3.2
 8.7
 8.9
 29.0
Operating Income (Loss) 47.5
 (2,117.4) 382.8
 (1,922.8)
Interest and Investment Income 2.7
 0.3
 7.9
 1.2
Interest Expense (4.0) (9.5) (14.7) (27.1)
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense 46.2
 (2,126.6) 376.0
 (1,948.7)
Income Tax Expense (Credit) 12.5
 (757.4) 129.7
 (699.9)
Net Income (Loss) 33.7
 (1,369.2) 246.3
 (1,248.8)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 
 
 
 
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders $33.7
 $(1,369.2) $246.3
 $(1,248.8)
Generation & Marketing
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders
(in millions)
  
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$72.6 $186.8 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Merchant Generation(4.6)(4.5)
Renewable Generation(6.8)(8.6)
Retail, Trading and Marketing(124.1)(348.9)
Total Change in Gross Margin(135.5)(362.0)
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance(62.2)(72.7)
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio— (112.0)
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights(116.3)(116.3)
Depreciation and Amortization14.2 19.3 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes1.4 1.7 
Interest and Investment Income4.9 11.8 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost1.3 2.8 
Interest Expense(17.2)(36.5)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(173.9)(301.9)
  
Income Tax Benefit19.5 90.9 
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries185.4 196.1 
Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(0.4)0.1 
  
2023 Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$(32.3)$(190.0)


Summary of MWhs Generated for Generation & Marketing
 Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of MWhs)
Fuel Type: 
  
  
  
Coal2
 8
 10
 19
Natural Gas
 4
 2
 11
Total MWhs2
 12
 12
 30



ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Generation & Marketing
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $(1,369.2)
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Generation (175.4)
Retail, Trading and Marketing (10.1)
Other 4.4
Total Change in Gross Margin (181.1)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 39.3
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 2,256.9
Depreciation and Amortization 44.3
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 5.5
Interest and Investment Income 2.4
Interest Expense 5.5
Total Change in Expenses and Other 2,353.9
   
Income Tax Expense (769.9)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $33.7


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, purchased electricity and certain cost of service for retail operations were as follows:


Renewable Generation decreased $7 million primarily due to lower production in 2023.
Retail, Trading and Marketing decreased $124 million primarily due to a $125 million unrealized loss on economic hedge activity in 2023 and a $46 million unrealized gain on economic hedge activity in 2022 driven by changes in commodity prices.


Generation
34


Expenses and Other, Income Tax Benefit and Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $62 million primarily due to a decrease in land sales and a prior year sale of renewable development projects.
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rightsdecreased $175$116 million due to the prior year sale of mineral rights.
Depreciation and Amortization decreased $14 million primarily due to the reductionceasing of revenues associated withdepreciation on the competitive contracted renewable portfolio assets as a result of held for sale of certain merchant generation assets.
classification in 2023.
Retail, Trading and Marketing decreased $10Interest Expense increased $17 million due to lower retail marginshigher interest rates in 2017 partially offset by favorable wholesale trading and marketing performance in 2017.
2023.
OtherIncome Tax Benefit increased $4$20 million primarily due to renewable projects placeda decrease in service.
pretax book income, partially offset by a decrease in PTCs.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $39Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries increased $185 million primarily due to decreased plant expenses as a result of the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $2.3 billion due to the asset impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $44 million primarily due to the sale andprior year impairment of certain merchant generation assets.
AEP’s investment in Flat Ridge 2 Wind LLC.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $6 million primarily due to the sale of certain merchant generation assets.

Interest Expense decreased $6 million primarily due to reduced debt as a result of the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Income Tax Expense increased $770 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income resulting primarily from the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.


NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Generation & Marketing
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $(1,248.8)
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Generation (376.2)
Retail, Trading and Marketing (33.6)
Other 14.0
Total Change in Gross Margin (395.8)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 78.8
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 2,243.8
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets 226.4
Depreciation and Amortization 132.3
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 20.1
Interest and Investment Income 6.7
Interest Expense 12.4
Total Change in Expenses and Other 2,720.5
   
Income Tax Expense (829.6)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $246.3


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, purchased electricity and certain cost of service for retail operations were as follows:


Renewable Generationdecreased $376$9 million primarily due to lower production in 2023.
Retail, Trading and Marketing decreased $349 million primarily due to a $269 million unrealized loss on economic hedge activity in 2023 and a $172 million unrealized gain on economic hedge activity in 2022 driven by changes in commodity prices.

Expenses and Other, Income Tax Benefit and Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $73 million primarily due to a decrease in land sales and a prior year sale of renewable development projects.
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio increased $112 million due to the pretax loss on the expected sale recorded in 2023.
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights decreased $116 million due to the prior year sale of mineral rights.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $19 million primarily due to the reductionceasing of revenues associated withdepreciation on the competitive contracted renewable portfolio assets as a result of held for sale of certain merchant generation assets.
classification in 2023.
Retail, TradingInterest and Marketing decreased $34Investment Income increased $12 million primarily due to lower marginshigher interest rates on advances to affiliates.
Interest Expense increased $37 million due to higher interest rates in 2017 combined with the impact of favorable wholesale trading and marketing performance in 2016.
2023.
OtherIncome Tax Benefit increased $14$91 million primarily due to renewable projects placeda decrease in service.
pretax book income partially offset by a decrease in PTCs.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $79 million primarily due to decreased plant expenses as a resultEquity Earnings (Loss) of the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $2.2 billion due to the asset impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets Unconsolidated Subsidiaries increased $226 million due to the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $132$196 million primarily due to the sale andprior year impairment of certain merchant generation assets.AEP’s investment in Flat Ridge 2 Wind LLC.
35

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $20 million primarily due to the sale of certain merchant generation assets.

Interest and Investment Income increased $7 million primarily due to increased cash invested as a result of the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Interest Expense decreased $12 million primarily due to reduced debt as a result of the sale of certain merchant generation assets.
Income Tax Expense increased $830 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income and state income taxes resulting primarily from the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in 2016.


CORPORATE AND OTHER


ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022


Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Corporate and Other decreasedincreased from $36a loss of $156 million in 20162022 to $5a loss of $98 million in 20172023 primarily due to:

A $69 million pretax loss in 2022 related to the termination of the sale of the Kentucky Operations.
A $34 million increase in interest income, primarily due to the prior year reversalhigher interest income from affiliates.
An $18 million decrease in Income Tax Expense primarily due to a $12 million increase in favorable consolidating tax adjustments in 2023 and unfavorable discrete adjustments of $7 million in 2022.
A $16 million decrease in corporate expenses.
A $14 million increase due to unrealized losses on AEP’s investment in ChargePoint in 2022. As of August 2022, AEP no longer has a capital loss valuation allowance related to the pending sale of certain merchant generation assets as well as tax return adjustments related to the prior year disposition of AEP’s commercial barging operations,direct investment in ChargePoint.

These items were partially offset by the gain recognized on the sale of a cost-based investmentby:

A $97 million increase in the third quarter of 2017.interest expense due to higher interest rates and an increase in short-term and long-term debt balances.


Nine
Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022


Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Corporate and Other decreasedincreased from incomea loss of $62$180 million in 20162022 to a loss of $11$111 million in 20172023 primarily due to:

A $78 million increase in interest income, primarily due to the prior year reversal of capitalhigher interest income from affiliates.
A $69 million pretax loss valuation allowances related to effectively settling a 2011 audit issue with the IRS and the impact of the pending sale of certain merchant generation assets as well as 2015 tax return adjustmentsin 2022 related to the dispositiontermination of AEP’s commercial barging operations, partially offset by the gain recognized on the sale of the Kentucky Operations.
A $51 million decrease in corporate expenses, primarily due to adjustments driven by the termination of the sale of Kentucky Operations.
A $28 million increase at EIS, primarily due to higher returns on investments.
A $21 million decrease in Income Tax Expense primarily due to a cost-basedfavorable discrete adjustment of $12 million related to Kentucky Operations outside basis in 2023, $6 million of unfavorable discrete adjustments in 2022 and a $5 million increase in favorable consolidating tax adjustments in 2023.
A $12 million increase due to unrealized losses on AEP’s investment in the third quarterChargePoint in 2022. As of 2017.August 2022, AEP no longer has a direct investment in ChargePoint.


These items were partially offset by:

A $187 million increase in interest expense due to higher interest rates on short-term debt and higher long-term debt balances.

AEP SYSTEM INCOME TAXES


ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022


Income Tax Expense increased $799decreased $25 million primarily due to:
A $21 million increase in PTCs.
A $7 million decrease due to an increasea decrease in pretax book income driven by the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in the third quarter of 2016. Theincome.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $7 million increase in Income Tax Expense is also due to the third quartera decrease in amortization of 2016 reversal of a $66 million capital loss valuation allowance related to the pending sale of certain merchant generation assets as well as prior year tax return adjustments related to the disposition of AEP’s commercial barging operations.Excess ADIT.


Nine
Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022


Income Tax Expense increased $932decreased $68 million primarily due to:
An $83 million decrease due to an increasea decrease in pretax book income driven by the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in the third quarter of 2016. The increase in Income Tax Expense is alsoincome.
A $12 million decrease due to the prior year reversal of a $56 million unrealized capital loss valuation allowance where AEP effectively settled a 2011 audit issue with the IRS, the prior year reversal of a $66 million capital loss valuation allowancediscrete adjustment related to the pending saleKentucky Operations outside basis in 2023.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $32 million increase due to a decrease in amortization of certain merchant generation assets as well as prior year tax return adjustments related to the disposition of AEP’s commercial barging operations.

Excess ADIT.

36


FINANCIAL CONDITION


AEP measures financial condition by the strength of its balance sheetsheets and the liquidity provided by its cash flows.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


Debt and Equity Capitalization
 June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
 (dollars in millions)
Long-term Debt, including amounts due within one year$40,142.3 58.9 %$36,801.0 56.6 %
Short-term Debt3,867.6 5.7 4,112.2 6.3 
Total Debt44,009.9 64.6 40,913.2 62.9 
AEP Common Equity23,901.4 35.1 23,893.4 36.7 
Noncontrolling Interests222.2 0.3 229.0 0.4 
Total Debt and Equity Capitalization$68,133.5 100.0 %$65,035.6 100.0 %
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
 (dollars in millions)
Long-term Debt, including amounts due within one year$20,721.7
 51.9% $20,391.2
(a)51.6%
Short-term Debt1,059.3
 2.7
 1,713.0
 4.3
Total Debt21,781.0
 54.6
 22,104.2
(a)55.9
AEP Common Equity18,069.1
 45.3
 17,397.0
 44.0
Noncontrolling Interests36.4
 0.1
 23.1
 0.1
Total Debt and Equity Capitalization$39,886.5
 100.0% $39,524.3
 100.0%

(a)Amounts include debt related to the Lawrenceburg Plant that has been classified as Liabilities Held for Sale on the balance sheet. See “Gavin, Waterford, Darby and Lawrenceburg Plants (Generation & Marketing Segment)” section of Note 6 for additional information.


AEP’s ratio of debt-to-total capital decreasedincreased from 55.9%62.9% as of December 31, 20162022 to 54.6%64.6% as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 primarily due to a decreasean increase in short-term debt due to the use of proceeds from the sale of Merchant Generation Assetssupport distribution, transmission and renewable investment growth in addition to pay down debt. See “Gavin, Waterford, Darby and Lawrenceburg Plants (Generation & Marketing Segment)” section of Note 6 for additional information.working capital needs.


Liquidity


Liquidity, or access to cash, is an important factor in determining AEP’s financial stability.  Management believes AEP has adequate liquidity under its existing credit facilities.liquidity.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, AEP had a $3$5 billion of revolving credit facility commitmentfacilities to support its operations. In May 2017, the $500 million revolving credit facility due in June 2018 was terminated.commercial paper program.  Additional liquidity is available from cash from operations and a receivables securitization agreement.  Management is committed to maintaining adequate liquidity.  AEP generally uses short-term borrowings to fund working capital needs, property acquisitions and construction until long-term funding is arranged.  Sources of long-term funding include issuance of long-term debt, sale-leaseback orlong-term asset securitizations, leasing agreements, hybrid securities or common stock. AEP and its utilities finance its operations with commercial paper and other variable rate instruments that are subject to fluctuations in interest rates. To the extent that the Federal Reserve continues to raise short-term interest rates, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. Market volatility and reduced liquidity in the financial markets could affect AEP’s ability to raise capital on reasonable terms to fund capital needs, including construction costs and refinancing maturing indebtedness. AEP is also monitoring the current bank environment and any impacts thereof. AEP was not materially impacted by these conditions during the six months ended June 30, 2023. AEP continues to address the cash flow implications of increased fuel and purchased power costs, see “Deferred Fuel Costs” section of Executive Overview for additional information. In February 2023, AEP entered into a $500 million term loan to address short-term liquidity needs.


Commercial Paper Credit FacilitiesNet Available Liquidity


AEP manages liquidity by maintaining adequate external financing commitments.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, available liquidity was approximately $3$3.1 billion as illustrated in the table below:
AmountMaturity
Commercial Paper Backup:(in millions)
Revolving Credit Facility$4,000.0 March 2027
Revolving Credit Facility1,000.0 March 2025
Cash and Cash Equivalents304.9 
Total Liquidity Sources5,304.9 
Less:AEP Commercial Paper Outstanding2,238.7 
Net Available Liquidity$3,066.2 
37

  Amount Maturity
  (in millions)  
Commercial Paper Backup: 
  
 Revolving Credit Facility$3,000.0
 June 2021
Total3,000.0
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents343.9
  
Total Liquidity Sources3,343.9
  
Less:AEP Commercial Paper Outstanding295.0
  
     
Net Available Liquidity$3,048.9
  


AEP has a $3 billion revolving credit facility to support its commercial paper program.


AEP uses its commercial paper program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of its subsidiaries.  The program is used to fund bothfunds a Utility Money Pool, which funds theAEP’s utility subsidiaries, andsubsidiaries; a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds certain AEP nonutility subsidiaries.  In addition, the program also funds, as direct borrowers,subsidiaries; and the short-term debt requirements of other subsidiaries that are not participantsparticipating in either money pool for regulatory or operational reasons.reasons, as direct borrowers.  The maximum amount of commercial paper outstanding during the first ninesix months of 20172023 was $1.6$3.2 billion.  The weighted-average interest rate for AEP’s commercial paper during 20172023 was 1.19%5.21%.


Other Credit Facilities


An uncommitted facility gives the issuer of the facility the right to accept or decline each request made under the facility. AEP issues letters of credit on behalf of subsidiaries under fivesix uncommitted facilities totaling $445$450 million. In August 2017, AEP executed a $75 million uncommitted letter of credit facility due in August 2018. As of September 30, 2017, theThe Registrants’ maximum future paymentpayments for letters of credit issued under the uncommitted facilities as of June 30, 2023 was $123$289 million with maturities ranging from October 2017July 2023 to September 2018.June 2024.


Securitized Accounts ReceivableReceivables


AEP’sAEP Credit’s receivables securitization agreement provides a commitment of $750 million from bank conduits to purchase receivables. The agreement expiresreceivables and includes a $125 million and a $625 million facility, both of which expire in September 2024. As of June 2019.30, 2023, the affiliated utility subsidiaries were in compliance with all requirements under the agreement.


Debt Covenants and Borrowing Limitations


AEP’s credit agreements contain certain covenants and require it to maintain a percentage of debt to totaldebt-to-total capitalization at a level that does not exceed 67.5%.  The method for calculating outstanding debt and capitalization is contractually definedcontractually-defined in AEP’s credit agreements.  Debt as defined in the revolving credit agreementsagreement excludes securitization bonds and debt of AEP Credit. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023,this contractually-defined percentage was 52.4%61.8%. NonperformanceNon-performance under these covenants could result in an event of default under these credit agreements.  In addition, the acceleration of AEP’s payment obligations, or the obligations of certain of AEP’s major subsidiaries, prior to maturity under any other agreement or instrument relating to debt outstanding in excess of $50 million, would cause an event of default under these credit agreements.  This condition also applies in a majority of AEP’s non-exchange tradednon-exchange-traded commodity contracts and would similarly allow lenders and counterparties to declare the outstanding amounts payable.  However, a default under AEP’s non-exchange tradednon-exchange-traded commodity contracts would not cause an event of default under its credit agreements.


The revolving credit facility doesfacilities do not permit the lenders to refuse a draw on theany facility if a material adverse change occurs.


Utility Money Pool borrowings and external borrowings may not exceed amounts authorized by regulatory orders and AEP manages its borrowings to stay within those authorized limits.


ATM Program

AEP participates in an ATM offering program that allows AEP to issue, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1 billion of its common stock, including shares of common stock that may be sold pursuant to an equity forward sales agreement. There were no issuances under the ATM program for the six months ended June 30, 2023. As of June 30, 2023, approximately $511 million of equity is available for issuance under the ATM offering program. See Note 12 - Financing Activities for additional information.

Equity Units

In August 2020, AEP issued 17 million Equity Units initially in the form of corporate units, at a stated amount of $50 per unit, for a total stated amount of $850 million. Net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $833 million. Each corporate unit represents a 1/20 undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of AEP’s 1.30% Junior Subordinated Notes due in 2025 and a forward equity purchase contract which settles after three years in August 2023. The proceeds were used to support AEP’s overall capital expenditure plans. In June
38


2023, AEP successfully remarketed the Junior Subordinated Notes on behalf of holders of the corporate units. AEP did not receive any proceeds from the remarketing which were used to purchase a portfolio of treasury securities maturing on August 14, 2023. On August 15, 2023, the proceeds from the maturing treasury portfolio, currently held by the collateral agent, will be used to settle the forward equity purchase contract entered into as part of the Equity Units transaction. The interest rate on the Junior Subordinated Notes was reset to 5.699% with the maturity remaining in 2025. See Note 12 - Financing Activities for additional information.

Dividend Policy and Restrictions


The Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.62$0.83 per share in October 2017.July 2023. Future dividends may vary depending upon AEP’s profit levels, operating cash flow levels and capital requirements, as well as financial and other business conditions existing at the time. Parent’s income primarily derives from common stock equity in the earnings of its utility subsidiaries. Various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements may impose certain restrictions on the ability of the subsidiaries to transfer funds to Parent in the form of dividends.

Management does not believe these restrictions related to AEP’s various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements will have any significant impact on its ability to access cash to meet the payment of dividends on its common stock. See “Dividend Restrictions” section of Note 12 for additional information.





Credit Ratings


AEP doesand its utility subsidiaries do not have any credit arrangements that would require material changes in payment schedules or terminations as a result of a credit downgrade, but its access to the commercial paper market may depend on theirits credit ratings.  In addition, downgrades in AEP’s credit ratings by one of the rating agencies could increase its borrowing costs.  Counterparty concerns about the credit quality of AEP or its utility subsidiaries could subject AEP to additional collateral demands under adequate assurance clauses under its derivative and non-derivative energy contracts.



39


CASH FLOW


AEP relies primarily on cash flows from operations, debt issuances and its existing cash and cash equivalents to fund its liquidity and investing activities. AEP’s investing and capital requirements are primarily capital expenditures, repaying of long-term debt and paying dividends to shareholders.
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period$210.5
 $176.4
Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities3,124.2
 3,421.0
Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Investing Activities(1,676.6) (3,428.7)
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Continuing Financing Activities(1,314.2) 46.0
Net Cash Flows Used for Discontinued Operations
 (2.5)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents133.4
 35.8
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$343.9
 $212.2

AEP uses short-term debt, including commercial paper, as a bridge to long-term debt financing. The levels of borrowing may vary significantly due to the timing of long-term debt financings and the impact of fluctuations in cash flows.

Six Months Ended 
June 30,
 20232022
 (in millions)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period$556.5 $451.4 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities1,881.6 2,990.7 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(4,265.5)(4,199.0)
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities2,178.1 1,378.1 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(205.8)169.8 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period$350.7 $621.2 

Operating Activities
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
20232022
(in millions)
Net Income$916.5 $1,238.9 
Non-Cash Adjustments to Net Income (a)1,692.6 1,694.8 
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts(124.7)431.4 
Property Taxes202.7 191.6 
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net342.5 (599.5)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets(375.5)(49.3)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(55.4)144.5 
Change in Certain Components of Working Capital(717.1)(61.7)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities$1,881.6 $2,990.7 
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Income from Continuing Operations$1,527.1
 $245.3
Depreciation and Amortization1,485.9
 1,550.2
Deferred Income Taxes740.9
 (47.0)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges10.6
 2,264.9
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets(226.4) 
Provision for Refund – Global Settlement, Net(93.3) 
Accrued Taxes, Net(310.1) (393.0)
Other(10.5) (199.4)
Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities$3,124.2
 $3,421.0


(a)Non-Cash Adjustments to Net Income includes Depreciation and Amortization, Deferred Income Taxes, Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio, Loss on the Expected Sale of the Kentucky Operations, Impairment of Equity Method Investment, AFUDC and Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights.

Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities were $3.1 decreased by $1.1 billion in 2017 consisting primarily of Income from Continuing Operations of $1.5 billion and $1.5 billion of noncash Depreciation and Amortization. In addition, AEP recorded a gain of $226 million on the sale of certain merchant generation assets. AEP also recorded asset impairments of $11 million. See Note 6 - Impairment, Disposition and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale for a complete discussion of this sale and these impairments. Deferred and Accrued Taxes changed primarily due to the income tax impacts associated withfollowing:
A $655 million decrease in cash from the saleChange in Certain Components of certain merchant generation assets and the receipt of a tax refund related to the U.K. Windfall Tax. AEP refunded $93 million to customers as part of the Ohio Global Settlement reached in 2016. Other changes represent items that had a current period cash flow impact, such as changes in working capital, as well as items that represent future rights or obligations to receive or pay cash, such as regulatory assets and liabilities.



Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities were $3.4 billion in 2016 consisting primarily of Income from Continuing Operations of $245 million and $1.6 billion of noncash Depreciation and Amortization. AEP also had asset impairments of $2.3 billion during the third quarter of 2016. See Note 6 - Impairment, Disposition and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale and Impairments for a complete discussion of asset impairments and other related charges. Accrued Taxes decreasedWorking Capital. The decrease is primarily due to the impactstiming of bonus depreciation relatedaccounts payable and property tax payments, increases in fuel, material and supplies driven by coal inventory on hand as a result of the mild current year weather and a decrease in margin deposits held due to unfavorable current year pricing variances. These decreases were partially offset by the Protecting Americanstiming of accounts receivable collections.
A $556 million decrease primarily due to a reduction in collateral held associated with risk management contracts driven by the reduction in commodity prices.
A $526 million decrease in cash from Tax Hikes ActChanges in Other Noncurrent Assets and Liabilities. This decrease is primarily due to changes in regulatory assets and liabilities driven by timing differences between collections from and refunds to customers under rate rider mechanisms.
A $325 million decrease in cash from Net Income, after non-cash adjustments. See Results of 2015. Deferred Income Taxes decreasedOperations for further detail.
40


These decreases in cash were partially offset by:
A $942 million increase in cash primarily due to the tax effecttiming of fuel and purchase power revenues and expenses. See the asset impairment partially offset by an increase in tax versus book temporary differences from operations, which includes provisions related to the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act“Deferred Fuel Costs” section of 2015. Other changes represent items that had a current period cash flow impact, such as changes in working capital, as well as items that represent future rights or obligations to receive or pay cash, such as regulatory assets and liabilities.Executive Overview for additional information.


Investing Activities
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
 20232022
 (in millions)
Construction Expenditures$(4,049.7)$(3,138.1)
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel(73.9)(67.7)
Acquisitions of Renewable Energy Facilities(145.7)(1,207.3)
Proceeds from Sale of Assets1.0 208.5 
Other2.8 5.6 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities$(4,265.5)$(4,199.0)
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Construction Expenditures$(3,778.2) $(3,387.0)
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel(73.2) (127.6)
Proceeds from Sale of Merchant Generation Assets2,159.6
 
Other15.2
 85.9
Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Investing Activities$(1,676.6) $(3,428.7)


Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Investing Activities were $1.7 billion in 2017 increased by $67 million primarily due to the following:
A $912 million increase in Construction Expenditures, for environmental, distribution and transmission investments, partially offset by the proceeds received from the sale of certain merchant generation assets. See Note 6 - Impairment, Disposition and Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale for a complete discussion of this sale.

Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Investing Activities were $3.4 billion in 2016 primarily due to Construction Expenditures for environmental, distributionincreases in Vertically Integrated Utilities of $414 million, Transmission and transmission investments.Distribution Utilities of $358 million and AEP Transmission Holdco of $157 million.

Financing Activities
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Issuance of Common Stock, Net$
 $34.2
Issuance/Retirement of Debt, Net(338.2) 930.3
Make Whole Premium on Extinguishment of Long-term Debt(46.1) 
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(875.0) (829.8)
Other(54.9) (88.7)
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Continuing Financing Activities$(1,314.2) $46.0

Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Financing ActivitiesA $208 million decrease in 2017 were $1.3 billion. AEP’s net debt retirements were $338 million. The net retirements include retirementsProceeds from Sale of $978 million of senior unsecured notes, $356 million of pollution control bonds, $258 million of securitization bonds, $835 million of other debt notes and repayments of $654 million of short term debt offset by issuances of $2.3 billion of senior unsecured notes, $242 million of pollution control bonds and $254 million of other debt notes. AEP also paid $46 million for a make whole premium on the early extinguishment of debt relatedAssets, primarily due to the sale of certain merchant generation assets.mineral rights in 2022. See “Dispositions” section of Note 6 - Impairment, Disposition and Assets and Liabilities Held for Saleadditional information.
These increases in cash used were partially offset by:
A $1.1 billion decrease due to the 2022 acquisition of Traverse, partially offset by the 2023 acquisition of the Rock Falls Wind Facility. See “Acquisitions” section of Note 6 for a complete discussion of this sale. AEP paid common stock dividends of $875 million. See Note 12 - additional information.

Financing Activities for a complete discussion of long-term debt issuances and retirements.

Six Months Ended 
June 30,
 20232022
 (in millions)
Issuance of Common Stock$77.6 $812.7 
Issuance/Retirement of Debt, Net3,072.5 1,572.7 
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(863.6)(803.5)
Other(108.4)(203.8)
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities$2,178.1 $1,378.1 



Net Cash Flows from Continuing Financing Activities in 2016 were $46 million. AEP’s net debt issuances were $930 million. The net issuances included an increased by $800 million primarily due to the following:
A $1.3 billion increase in short-term borrowing of $678 million, issuances of $950 million of senior unsecured notes, $191 million of pollution control bonds and $430 million of other debt notes offset by retirements of $507 million of senior unsecured notes, $289 million of securitization bonds, $251 million of pollution control bonds and $261 million of other debt notes. AEP paid common stock dividends of $830 million.long-term debt. See Note 12 - Financing Activities for a complete discussionadditional information.
A $239 million increase due to changes in short-term debt. See Note 12 - Financing Activities for additional information.
These increases in cash were partially offset by:
A $735 million decrease in issuances of long-termcommon stock primarily due to the prior year settlement of the 2019 equity units.

See the “Long-term Debt Subsequent Events” section of Note 12 for Long-term debt issuances and retirements.

In October 2017, I&Mother securities issued, retired $1 million of Notes Payable related to DCC Fuel.

In October 2017, AEP Texas retired $41 million of 5.625% Pollution Control Bonds due in 2017.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

AEP’s current guidelines restrictand principal payments made after June 30, 2023 through July 27, 2023, the use of off-balance sheet financing entities or structures to traditional operating lease arrangementsdate that AEP enters in the normal course of business.  The following identifies significant off-balance sheet arrangements:second quarter 10-Q was filed.
41


 September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 (in millions)
Rockport Plant, Unit 2 Future Minimum Lease Payments$812.4
 $886.2
Railcars Maximum Potential Loss from Lease Agreement16.9
 18.4
BUDGETED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES


Management forecasts approximately $6.8 billion of capital expenditures in 2023. For the four year period, 2024 through 2027, management forecasts capital expenditures of $32.9 billion. The expenditures are generally for transmission, generation, distribution, regulated renewables and required environmental investment to comply with the Federal EPA rules.  Estimated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and modification and may vary based on the ongoing effects of regulatory constraints, environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, supply chain issues, weather, legal reviews, inflation and the ability to access capital.  Management expects to fund these capital expenditures through cash flows from operations, proceeds from the sale of competitive contracted renewables and financing activities.  Generally, the Registrant Subsidiaries use cash or short-term borrowings under the money pool to fund these expenditures until long-term funding is arranged. For complete information on each of these off-balance sheet arrangements,forecasted capital expenditures, see the “Off-balance Sheet Arrangements”“Budgeted Capital Expenditures” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 20162022 Annual Report.


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION INFORMATIONSIGNIFICANT CASH REQUIREMENTS


A summary of contractual obligationssignificant cash requirements is included in the 20162022 Annual Report and has not changed significantly from year-end other than the debt issuances and retirements discussed in the “Cash Flow” section above.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES AND ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTSSTANDARDS


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES


See the “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 20162022 Annual Report for a discussion of the estimates and judgments required for regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, derivative instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets, the accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits and the impact of new accounting pronouncements.standards.


ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTSSTANDARDS


See Note 2 - New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted During 2017

The FASB issued ASU 2015-11 “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” simplifying the guidance on the subsequent measurement of inventory, excluding inventory measured using last-in, first-out or the retail inventory method. Under theStandards for information related to accounting standards. There are no new standard, inventory should be at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 with early adoption permitted. Management adopted ASU 2015-11 prospectively, effective January 1, 2017. There was no impact on results of operations, financial position or cash flows at adoption.

The FASB issued ASU 2016-09 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” simplifying the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities


and classification on the statements of cash flows. Under the new standard, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit on the statements of income. Under current GAAP, excess tax benefits are recognized in additional paid-in capital while tax deficiencies are recognized either as an offsetstandards expected to accumulated excess tax benefits, if any, or on the statements of income.  Management adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. As a result of the adoption of this guidance, management made an accounting policy election to recognize the effect of forfeitures in compensation cost when they occur. There was an immaterial impact on results of operations and financial position and no impact on cash flows at adoption.

Pronouncements Effective in the Future

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, determine the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts. The FASB deferred implementation of ASU 2014-09 under the terms in ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic: 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.” The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. Management continues to analyze the impact of the new revenue standard and related ASUs.

During 2016 and 2017, revenue contract assessments were completed. Material revenue streams were identified within the AEP System and representative contract/transaction types were sampled. Performance obligations identified within each material revenue stream were evaluated to determine whether the obligations were satisfied at a point in time or over time. Contracts determined to be satisfied over time generally qualified for the invoicing practical expedient since the invoiced amounts reasonably represented the value to customers of performance obligations fulfilled to date. Based upon the completed assessments, management does not expecthave a material impact to the timing of revenue recognized or net income and plans to elect the modified retrospective transition approach upon adoption.

The evaluation of revenue streams, new contracts and the new revenue standard’s disclosure requirements continues during the fourth quarter of 2017, in particular with respect to various ongoing industry implementation issues. Management will continue to analyze the related impacts to revenue recognition and monitor any new industry implementation issues that arise. Further, given industry conclusions related to implementation issues, including contributions in aid of construction and collectability, management does not anticipate changes to current accounting systems. Management plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018.

The FASB issued ASU 2016-01 “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” enhancing the reporting model for financial instruments. Under the new standard, equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are required to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The new standard also amends disclosure requirements and requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheets or the accompanying notes to theRegistrants’ financial statements. The amendments also clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The amendments will be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018.

The FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Accounting for Leases” increasing the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheets and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new standard, an entity must recognize an asset and liability for operating leases on the balance sheets. Additionally, a capital lease will be known as a finance lease going forward. Leases with lease terms of 12 months or longer will be subject to the new requirements. Fundamentally, the criteria used to determine


lease classification will remain the same, but will be more subjective under the new standard. The new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The guidance will be applied by means of a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach will require lessees and lessors to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented. Management continues to analyze the impact of the new lease standard. During 2016 and 2017, lease contract assessments were completed. The AEP System lease population was identified and representative lease contracts were sampled. Based upon the completed assessments, management prepared a system gap analysis to outline new disclosure compliance requirements compared to current system capabilities. Multiple lease system options were also evaluated. Management plans to elect certain of the following practical expedients upon adoption:
42
Practical ExpedientDescription
Overall Expedients (for leases commenced prior to adoption date and must be adopted as a package)Do not need to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases, do not need to reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and do not need to reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
Lease and Non-lease Components (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead account for each lease and associated non-lease component as a single lease component.
Short-term Lease (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases.
Lease termElect to use hindsight to determine the lease term.



Evaluation of new lease contracts continues and the process of implementing a compliant lease system solution began in the third quarter of 2017. Management expects the new standard to impact financial position, but not results of operations or cash flows. Management also continues to monitor unresolved industry implementation issues, including items related to pole attachments, easements and right-of-ways, and will analyze the related impacts to lease accounting. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019.

The FASB issued ASU 2016-13 “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” requiring an allowance to be recorded for all expected credit losses for financial assets. The allowance for credit losses is based on historical information, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The new standard also makes revisions to the other than temporary impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. Disclosures of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables are further disaggregated by year of origination. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2020.

The FASB issued ASU 2016-18 “Restricted Cash” clarifying the treatment of restricted cash on the statements of cash flows. Under the new standard, amounts considered restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts on the statements of cash flows. The new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The guidance will be applied by means of a retrospective approach. Management is analyzing the impact of the new standard. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-18 effective for the 2017 Annual Report.

The FASB issued ASU 2017-07 “Compensation - Retirement Benefits” requiring that an employer report the service cost component of pension and postretirement benefits in the same line item or items as other compensation costs. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside of a subtotal of income from operations. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization as applicable following labor. For 2016, AEP’s actual non-service cost components were a credit of $66 million, of which approximately 37% was capitalized. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. Management plans to adopt ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018.


The FASB issued ASU 2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging” amending the recognition and presentation requirements for hedge accounting activities. The objectives are to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and reduce the complexity of applying hedge accounting. Under the new standard, the concept of recognizing hedge ineffectiveness within the statements of income for cash flow hedges, which has historically been immaterial to AEP, will be eliminated. In addition, certain required tabular disclosures relating to fair value and cash flow hedges will be modified. The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted for any interim or annual period after August 2017. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard, including the possibility of early adoption, and at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income.

Future Accounting Changes

The FASB’s standard-setting process is ongoing and until new standards have been finalized and issued, management cannot determine the impact on the reporting of operations and financial position that may result from any such future changes.  Future pronouncements issued by the FASB could have an impact on future net income and financial position.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Market Risks


The Vertically Integrated Utilities segment is exposed to certain market risks as a major power producer and through transactions in power, coal, natural gas and marketing contracts. These risks include commodity price risks which may be subject to capacity risk, credit risk as well as interest rate risk. In addition, this segment is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk from occasionally procuring various services and materials used in its energy business from foreign suppliers. These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact this segment due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.


The Transmission and Distribution Utilities segment is exposed to energy procurement risk and interest rate risk.


The Generation & Marketing segment conducts marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, PJM, SPP and MISO. This segment is exposed to certain market risks as a marketer of wholesale and retail electricity. These risks include commodity price risks which may be subject to capacity risk, credit risk as well as interest rate risk. These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact this segment due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates. In addition, the Generation & Marketing segment is also exposed to certain market risks as a power producer and through transactions in wholesale electricity, natural gas and marketing contracts.


Management employs risk management contracts including physical forward and financial forward purchase-and-sale contracts.  Management engages in risk management of power, capacity, coal, natural gas and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other commodity contracts to manage the risk associated with the energy business.  As a result, AEP is subject to price risk.  The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations, Energy Supply and Finance groups in accordance with established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors.  AEPSC’s market risk oversight staff independently monitors risk policies, procedures and risk levels and provides members of the Commercial OperationsRegulated Risk Committee (Regulated Risk Committee) and the Energy Supply Risk Committee (Competitive Risk Committee) various reports regarding compliance with policies, limits and procedures.  The Regulated Risk Committee consists of AEPSC’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Commercial Officer, Executive Vice President of Generation,Utilities, Senior Vice President of Regulated Commercial Operations, Senior Vice President of Treasury and Risk and Chief Risk Officer.  The Competitive Risk Committee consists of AEPSC’s Chief Financial Officer, Chief Commercial Officer, Senior Vice President of Treasury and Risk, Senior Vice President of Competitive Commercial Operations and Chief Risk Officer in addition to Energy Supply’s President and Vice President.Officer.  When commercial activities exceed predetermined limits, positions are modified to reduce the risk to be within the limits unless specifically approved by the respective committee.

43




The following table summarizes the reasons for changes in total MTM value as compared to December 31, 2016:2022:
MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically
Integrated
Utilities
Transmission
and
Distribution
Utilities
Generation
&
Marketing
Total
 (in millions)
Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) as of December 31, 2022$134.7 $(40.0)$360.5 $455.2 
(Gain)/Loss from Contracts Realized/Settled During the Period and Entered in a Prior Period(145.5)0.5 (112.4)(257.4)
Fair Value of New Contracts at Inception When Entered During the Period (a)— — 1.5 1.5 
Changes in Fair Value Due to Market Fluctuations During the Period (b)11.7 — (198.2)(186.5)
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (c)140.6 (15.4)— 125.2 
Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) as of June 30, 2023$141.5 $(54.9)$51.4 138.0 
Commodity Cash Flow Hedge Contracts
 119.0 
Fair Value Hedge Contracts  (124.7)
Collateral Deposits  (37.5)
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets as of June 30, 2023  $94.8 
MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
        
 
Vertically
Integrated
Utilities
 
Transmission
and
Distribution
Utilities
 
Generation
&
Marketing
 Total
 (in millions)
Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) as of December 31, 2016$5.2
 $(118.2) $164.2
 $51.2
(Gain) Loss from Contracts Realized/Settled During the Period and Entered in a Prior Period(7.0) 3.4
 (32.8) (36.4)
Fair Value of New Contracts at Inception When Entered During the Period (a)
 
 26.7
 26.7
Changes in Fair Value Due to Market Fluctuations During the Period (b)
 
 10.5
 10.5
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (c)64.9
 (23.2) 
 41.7
Total MTM Risk Management Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) as of September 30, 2017$63.1
 $(138.0) $168.6
 93.7
Commodity Cash Flow Hedge Contracts
   
  
 (75.6)
Interest Rate and Foreign Currency Cash Flow Hedge Contracts
   
  
 4.2
Fair Value Hedge Contracts   
  
 (1.4)
Collateral Deposits   
  
 13.5
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets as of September 30, 2017   
  
 $34.4


(a)Reflects fair value on primarily long-term structured contracts which are typically with customers that seek fixed pricing to limit their risk against fluctuating energy prices. The contract prices are valued against market curves associated with the delivery location and delivery term. A significant portion of the total volumetric position has been economically hedged.
(a)Reflects fair value on primarily long-term structured contracts which are typically with customers that seek fixed pricing to limit their risk against fluctuating energy prices.  The contract prices are valued against market curves associated with the delivery location and delivery term.  A significant portion of the total volumetric position has been economically hedged.
(b)Market fluctuations are attributable to various factors such as supply/demand, weather, etc.
(c)Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory liabilities/assets or accounts payable.

(b)Market fluctuations are attributable to various factors such as supply/demand, weather, etc.
(c)Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory liabilities/assets or accounts payable on the balance sheet.

See Note 9 – Derivatives and Hedging and Note 10 – Fair Value Measurements for additional information related to risk management contracts.  The following tables and discussion provide information on credit risk and market volatility risk.



44


Credit Risk


Credit risk is mitigated in wholesale marketing and trading activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis. Management uses Moody’s Investors Service Inc., S&P Global Inc.credit agency ratings and current market-based qualitative and quantitative data as well as financial statements to assess the financial health of counterparties on an ongoing basis.




AEP has risk management contracts (includes non-derivative contracts) with numerous counterparties. Since open risk management contracts are valued based on changes in market prices of the related commodities, exposures change daily. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, credit exposure net of collateral to sub investment grade counterparties was approximately 7.9%0.4%, expressed in terms of net MTM assets, net receivables and the net open positions for contracts not subject to MTM (representing economic risk even though there may not be risk of accounting loss).

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the following table approximates AEP’s counterparty credit quality and exposure based on netting across commodities, instruments and legal entities where applicable:
Counterparty Credit QualityExposure
Before
Credit
Collateral
Credit
Collateral
Net
Exposure
Number of
Counterparties
>10% of
Net Exposure
Net Exposure
of
Counterparties
>10%
 (in millions, except number of counterparties)
Investment Grade$396.9 $72.5 $324.4 $142.2 
Split Rating32.7 — 32.7 32.7 
No External Ratings:    
Internal Investment Grade40.4 — 40.4 25.1 
Internal Noninvestment Grade2.3 0.7 1.6 1.6 
Total as of June 30, 2023$472.3 $73.2 $399.1 
Counterparty Credit Quality 
Exposure
Before
Credit
Collateral
 
Credit
Collateral
 
Net
Exposure
 Number of
Counterparties
>10% of
Net Exposure
 
Net Exposure
of
Counterparties
>10%
  (in millions, except number of counterparties)
Investment Grade $619.6
 $2.2
 $617.4
 3
 $352.2
Split Rating 5.6
 
 5.6
 2
 5.6
Noninvestment Grade 
 
 
 
 
No External Ratings:  
  
 

  
  
Internal Investment Grade 119.2
 
 119.2
 3
 78.7
Internal Noninvestment Grade 75.4
 11.5
 63.9
 3
 40.5
Total as of September 30, 2017 $819.8
 $13.7
 $806.1
 

 



All exposure in the table above relates to AEPSC and AEPEP as AEPSC is agent for and transacts on behalf of certain AEP subsidiaries, including the Registrant Subsidiaries and AEPEP is agent for and transacts on behalf of other AEP subsidiaries.

In addition, AEP is exposed to credit risk related to participation in RTOs. For each of the RTOs in which AEP participates, this risk is generally determined based on the proportionate share of member gross activity over a specified period of time.


Value at Risk (VaR) Associated with Risk Management Contracts


Management uses a risk measurement model, which calculates VaR, to measure AEP’s commodity price risk in the risk management portfolio. The VaR is based on the variance-covariance method using historical prices to estimate volatilities and correlations and assumes a 95% confidence level and a one-day holding period. Based on this VaR analysis, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, a near term typical change in commodity prices is not expected to materially impact net income, cash flows or financial condition.


Management calculates the VaR for both a trading and non-trading portfolio. The trading portfolio consists primarily of contracts related to energy trading and marketing activities. The non-trading portfolio consists primarily of economic hedges of generation and retail supply activities.
45


The following tables show the end, high, average and low market risk as measured by VaR for the periods indicated:


VaR Model
Trading Portfolio
Six Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
EndHighAverageLowEndHighAverageLow
(in millions)(in millions)
$0.2 $0.9 $0.3 $0.1 $0.5 $4.5 $0.7 $0.1 
Nine Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
End High Average Low End High Average Low
(in millions) (in millions)
$0.2
 $0.4
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $0.2
 $1.1
 $0.2
 $0.1


VaR Model
Non-Trading Portfolio
Six Months EndedTwelve Months Ended
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
EndHighAverageLowEndHighAverageLow
(in millions)(in millions)
$25.0 $32.7 $15.2 $6.1 $17.7 $76.9 $24.7 $6.7 
Nine Months Ended Twelve Months Ended
September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
End High Average Low End High Average Low
(in millions) (in millions)
$0.7
 $6.5
 $0.9
 $0.3
 $5.6
 $8.4
 $1.5
 $0.4



Management back-tests VaR results against performance due to actual price movements. Based on the assumed 95% confidence interval, the performance due to actual price movements would be expected to exceed the VaR at least once every 20 trading days.


As the VaR calculation captures recent price movements, management also performs regular stress testing of the trading portfolio to understand AEP’s exposure to extreme price movements. A historical-based method is employed whereby the current trading portfolio is subjected to actual, observed price movements from the last several years in order to ascertain which historical price movements translated into the largest potential MTM loss. Management then researches the underlying positions, price movements and market events that created the most significant exposure and reports the findings to the Risk Executive Committee, Regulated Risk Committee or Competitive Risk Committee as appropriate.


Interest Rate Risk


Management utilizes an Earnings at Risk (EaR) modelAEP is exposed to measure interest rate market fluctuations in the normal course of business operations. Prior to 2022, interest rates remained at low levels and the Federal Reserve maintained the federal funds target range at 0.0% to 0.25% for much of 2021. However, during 2022, the Federal Reserve approved several rate increases for a cumulative total of a 4.25% increase. In the first six months of 2023, the Federal Reserve approved another three rate increases for a cumulative total of a 0.75% rate increase and further increases in interest rates may be authorized during 2023. AEP has outstanding short and long-term debt which is subject to variable rates. AEP manages interest rate risk exposure. EaR statistically quantifiesby limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt, by entering into interest rate derivative instruments and by monitoring the extent to whicheffects of market changes in interest rates. For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, a 100 basis point change in the benchmark rate on AEP’s variable rate debt would impact pretax interest expense could vary over the next twelve months and gives a probabilistic estimate of different levels of interest expense. The resulting EaR is interpreted as the dollar amountannually by which actual interest expense for the next twelve months could exceed expected interest expense with a one-in-twenty chance of occurrence. The primary drivers of EaR are from the existing floating rate debt (including short-term debt) as well as long-term debt issuances in the next twelve months. As calculated on debt outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the estimated EaR on AEP’s debt portfolio for the following twelve months was $30$53 million and $29$38 million, respectively.

46





AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSINCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions, except per-share and share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
REVENUES
Vertically Integrated Utilities$2,629.0 $2,595.0 $5,445.3 $5,241.8 
Transmission and Distribution Utilities1,330.8 1,296.8 2,786.1 2,539.0 
Generation & Marketing318.2 654.4 645.1 1,263.9 
Other Revenues94.5 93.5 186.9 187.6 
TOTAL REVENUES4,372.5 4,639.7 9,063.4 9,232.3 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation1,424.6 1,564.4 3,131.0 3,065.1 
Other Operation631.2 619.8 1,311.2 1,282.0 
Maintenance340.0 326.5 657.3 611.5 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Kentucky Operations— 68.8 — 68.8 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio— — 112.0 — 
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights— (116.3)— (116.3)
Depreciation and Amortization741.6 802.6 1,517.1 1,595.0 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes360.4 369.5 755.3 733.7 
TOTAL EXPENSES3,497.8 3,635.3 7,483.9 7,239.8 
OPERATING INCOME874.7 1,004.4 1,579.5 1,992.5 
Other Income (Expense):    
Other Income (Expense)14.4 (12.7)29.1 (10.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction41.0 28.6 72.3 59.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost55.2 47.1 110.7 94.3 
Interest Expense(460.0)(327.6)(875.7)(641.0)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY EARNINGS (LOSS)525.3 739.8 915.9 1,495.0 
Income Tax Expense28.6 54.0 39.0 106.8 
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries19.4 (165.0)39.6 (149.3)
NET INCOME516.1 520.8 916.5 1,238.9 
Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(5.1)(3.7)(1.7)(0.3)
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$521.2 $524.5 $918.2 $1,239.2 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING514,879,144 513,623,431 514,529,837 509,857,710 
TOTAL BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$1.01 $1.02 $1.78 $2.43 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF DILUTED AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING516,242,919 515,162,210 515,922,446 511,391,735 
TOTAL DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$1.01 $1.02 $1.78 $2.42 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
47
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Vertically Integrated Utilities $2,453.8
 $2,538.3
 $6,819.3
 $6,864.6
Transmission and Distribution Utilities 1,149.7
 1,245.4
 3,242.7
 3,398.9
Generation & Marketing 441.5
 823.3
 1,386.8
 2,192.5
Other Revenues 59.7
 45.2
 165.7
 134.0
TOTAL REVENUES 4,104.7
 4,652.2
 11,614.5
 12,590.0
         
EXPENSES  
  
  
  
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation 707.4
 880.1
 1,865.3
 2,236.1
Purchased Electricity for Resale 718.1
 774.0
 2,156.9
 2,134.6
Other Operation 636.1
 771.1
 1,842.5
 2,150.7
Maintenance 268.0
 286.3
 859.4
 854.4
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges (2.5) 2,264.9
 10.6
 2,264.9
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets 
 
 (226.4) 
Depreciation and Amortization 518.5
 539.3
 1,485.9
 1,550.2
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 272.6
 264.4
 792.0
 767.9
TOTAL EXPENSES 3,118.2
 5,780.1
 8,786.2
 11,958.8
         
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 986.5
 (1,127.9) 2,828.3
 631.2
         
Other Income (Expense):  
  
  
  
Interest and Investment Income 2.4
 2.0
 12.7
 6.5
Carrying Costs Income 2.6
 1.7
 14.2
 11.9
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 20.0
 25.6
 62.2
 86.1
Gain on Sale of Equity Investment 12.4
 
 12.4
 
Interest Expense (223.3) (225.3) (668.0) (667.2)
         
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (CREDIT) AND EQUITY EARNINGS 800.6
 (1,323.9) 2,261.8
 68.5
         
Income Tax Expense (Credit) 264.0
 (534.5) 797.8
 (134.0)
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries 20.1
 25.2
 63.1
 42.8
         
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS 556.7
 (764.2) 1,527.1
 245.3
         
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX 
 
 
 (2.5)
         
NET INCOME (LOSS) 556.7
 (764.2) 1,527.1
 242.8
         
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 12.0
 1.6
 15.2
 5.3
         
EARNINGS (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $544.7
 $(765.8) $1,511.9
 $237.5
         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 491,840,722
 491,697,809
 491,781,643
 491,422,921
         
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS $1.11
 $(1.56) $3.07
 $0.49
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 
 
 
 (0.01)
TOTAL BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $1.11
 $(1.56) $3.07
 $0.48
         
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF DILUTED AEP COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 492,986,307
 491,813,858
 492,428,586
 491,596,861
         
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS $1.10
 $(1.56) $3.07
 $0.49
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 
 
 
 (0.01)
TOTAL DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $1.10
 $(1.56) $3.07
 $0.48
         
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE $0.59
 $0.56
 $1.77
 $1.68


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
Net Income$516.1 $520.8 $916.5 $1,238.9 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES    
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $9.3 and $35.2 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(31.2) and $101.1 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively34.8 132.4 (117.6)380.4 
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.8) and $(3.1) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(5.1) and $(3.7) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(3.1)(11.6)(19.2)(13.8)
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets, Net of Tax of $0 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $4.4 and $0 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively— — 16.7 — 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)31.7 120.8 (120.1)366.6 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME547.8 641.6 796.4 1,605.5 
Total Comprehensive Loss Attributable To Noncontrolling Interests(5.1)(3.7)(1.7)(0.3)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS$552.9 $645.3 $798.1 $1,605.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
48
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income (Loss) $556.7
 $(764.2) $1,527.1
 $242.8
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES  
  
  
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $(8.1) and $(15.4) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(12.2) and $(11.2) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively (15.0) (28.6) (22.6) (20.8)
Securities Available for Sale, Net of Tax of $0.5 and $0.3 for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $1.5 and $1 for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively 0.9
 0.5
 2.7
 1.7
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $0.1 and $0.1 for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $0.4 and $0.2 for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively 0.3
 0.2
 0.8
 0.4
         
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (13.8) (27.9) (19.1) (18.7)
         
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) 542.9
 (792.1) 1,508.0
 224.1
         
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 12.0
 1.6
 15.2
 5.3
         
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS $530.9
 $(793.7) $1,492.8
 $218.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
AEP Common Shareholders
Common StockAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
SharesAmountPaid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021524.4 $3,408.7 $7,172.6 $11,667.1 $184.8 $247.0 $22,680.2 
Issuance of Common Stock0.4 2.4 807.1  809.5 
Common Stock Dividends(395.2)(a)(3.6)(398.8)
Other Changes in Equity(15.2)(1.5)(16.7)
Net Income   714.7 3.4 718.1 
Other Comprehensive Income    245.8 245.8 
TOTAL EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2022524.8 3,411.1 7,964.5 11,985.1 430.6 246.8 24,038.1 
Issuance of Common Stock0.1 0.9 2.3    3.2 
Common Stock Dividends   (402.6)(a) (2.1)(404.7)
Other Changes in Equity  17.2 1.6  18.8 
Net Income (Loss)   524.5  (3.7)520.8 
Other Comprehensive Income    120.8  120.8 
TOTAL EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022524.9 $3,412.0 $7,984.0 $12,108.6 $551.4 $241.0 $24,297.0 
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022525.1 $3,413.1 $8,051.0 $12,345.6 $83.7 $229.0 $24,122.4 
Issuance of Common Stock0.8 5.1 36.0 41.1 
Common Stock Dividends(428.8)(b)(3.0)(431.8)
Other Changes in Equity(12.7)0.2 (12.5)
Net Income397.0 3.4 400.4 
Other Comprehensive Loss(151.8)(151.8)
TOTAL EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2023525.9 3,418.2 8,074.3 12,313.8 (68.1)229.6 23,967.8 
Issuance of Common Stock0.5 3.3 33.2 36.5 
Common Stock Dividends(429.5)(b)(2.3)(431.8)
Other Changes in Equity3.3 3.3 
Net Income (Loss)521.2 (5.1)516.1 
Other Comprehensive Income31.7 31.7 
TOTAL EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023526.4 $3,421.5 $8,110.8 $12,405.5 $(36.4)$222.2 $24,123.6 
 AEP Common Shareholders    
 Common Stock     
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    
 Shares Amount 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
  
Noncontrolling
Interests
 Total
TOTAL EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015511.4
 $3,324.0
 $6,296.5
 $8,398.3
 $(127.1) $13.2
 $17,904.9
              
Issuance of Common Stock0.6
 4.3
 29.9
  
  
  
 34.2
Common Stock Dividends 
  
  
 (826.4)  
 (3.4) (829.8)
Other Changes in Equity 
  
 3.6
    
 6.0
 9.6
Net Income      237.5
  
 5.3
 242.8
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
  
 (18.7)  
 (18.7)
TOTAL EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016512.0
 $3,328.3
 $6,330.0
 $7,809.4
 $(145.8) $21.1
 $17,343.0
              
TOTAL EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016512.0
 $3,328.3
 $6,332.6
 $7,892.4
 $(156.3) $23.1
 $17,420.1
              
Common Stock Dividends 
  
  
 (872.3)  
 (2.7) (875.0)
Other Changes in Equity 
  
 51.6
    
 0.8
 52.4
Net Income      1,511.9
  
 15.2
 1,527.1
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
  
 (19.1)  
 (19.1)
TOTAL EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017512.0
 $3,328.3
 $6,384.2
 $8,532.0
 $(175.4) $36.4
 $18,105.5

(a)    Cash dividends declared per AEP common share were $0.78.
(b)    Cash dividends declared per AEP common share were $0.83.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118115.

49



AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$304.9 $509.4 
Restricted Cash
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $45.8 and $47.1, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, Restoration Funding and Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding)
45.8 47.1 
Other Temporary Investments
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $190.9 and $182.9, Respectively, Related to EIS and Transource Energy)
202.5 187.6 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers990.8 1,145.1 
Accrued Unbilled Revenues179.2 322.9 
Pledged Accounts Receivable – AEP Credit1,226.6 1,207.4 
Miscellaneous47.9 49.7 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts(58.6)(57.1)
Total Accounts Receivable2,385.9 2,668.0 
Fuel705.9 435.1 
Materials and Supplies975.9 915.1 
Risk Management Assets279.5 348.8 
Accrued Tax Benefits191.8 99.4 
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs1,256.4 1,310.0 
Assets Held for Sale1,382.8 — 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets309.9 255.0 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS8,041.3 6,775.5 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Generation24,113.5 25,834.2 
Transmission34,145.5 33,266.9 
Distribution28,033.8 27,138.8 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Coal Mining and Nuclear Fuel)6,187.6 5,971.8 
Construction Work in Progress5,935.4 4,809.7 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment98,415.8 97,021.4 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization23,734.4 23,682.3 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET74,681.4 73,339.1 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets4,672.8 4,762.0 
Securitized Assets394.3 446.0 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts3,648.8 3,341.2 
Goodwill52.5 52.5 
Long-term Risk Management Assets266.8 284.1 
Operating Lease Assets634.1 645.5 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets3,610.1 3,757.4 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS13,279.4 13,288.7 
TOTAL ASSETS$96,002.1 $93,403.3 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
50
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents $343.9
 $210.5
Other Temporary Investments
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $300.5 and $322.5, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding, EIS, Transource Energy and Sabine)
 310.7
 331.7
Accounts Receivable:  
  
Customers 522.7
 705.1
Accrued Unbilled Revenues 187.3
 158.7
Pledged Accounts Receivable – AEP Credit 967.6
 972.7
Miscellaneous 99.9
 118.1
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (36.6) (37.9)
Total Accounts Receivable 1,740.9
 1,916.7
Fuel 354.2
 423.8
Materials and Supplies 562.3
 543.5
Risk Management Assets 146.1
 94.5
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs 153.5
 156.6
Margin Deposits 105.7
 79.9
Assets Held for Sale 
 1,951.2
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 350.5
 325.5
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 4,067.8
 6,033.9
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
  
Electric:  
  
Generation 20,739.3
 19,848.9
Transmission 17,785.4
 16,658.7
Distribution 19,589.4
 18,900.8
Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Coal Mining and Nuclear Fuel) 3,614.1
 3,444.3
Construction Work in Progress 3,710.0
 3,183.9
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 65,438.2
 62,036.6
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 17,121.7
 16,397.3
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET 48,316.5
 45,639.3
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
  
Regulatory Assets 5,640.0
 5,625.5
Securitized Assets 1,287.8
 1,486.1
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts 2,433.0
 2,256.2
Goodwill 52.5
 52.5
Long-term Risk Management Assets 310.4
 289.1
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 1,856.9
 2,085.1
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 11,580.6
 11,794.5
     
TOTAL ASSETS $63,964.9
 $63,467.7


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(dollars in millions)millions, except per-share and share amounts)
(Unaudited)
       September 30, December 31,
       2017 2016
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Accounts Payable      $1,537.0
 $1,688.5
Short-term Debt:         
Securitized Debt for Receivables – AEP Credit      750.0
 673.0
Other Short-term Debt      309.3
 1,040.0
Total Short-term Debt      1,059.3
 1,713.0
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $393.7 and $427.5, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, DCC Fuel, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding and Sabine)
  2,359.3
 2,878.0
Risk Management Liabilities      69.4
 53.4
Customer Deposits      346.6
 343.2
Accrued Taxes      716.5
 1,048.0
Accrued Interest      260.3
 227.2
Regulatory Liability for Over-Recovered Fuel Costs    19.7
 8.0
Liabilities Held for Sale      
 235.9
Other Current Liabilities      953.9
 1,302.8
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES      7,322.0
 9,498.0
        
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $1421.5 and $1,737.5, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding, DCC Fuel, Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding, Transource Energy, and Sabine)
  18,362.4
 17,378.4
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities      352.7
 316.2
Deferred Income Taxes      12,628.2
 11,884.4
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits  3,959.6
 3,751.3
Asset Retirement Obligations      1,919.3
 1,830.6
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations      468.9
 614.1
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities  837.0
 774.6
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES      38,528.1
 36,549.6
          
TOTAL LIABILITIES      45,850.1
 46,047.6
          
Rate Matters (Note 4)      
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)      
 
          
MEZZANINE EQUITY    
Contingently Redeemable Performance Share Awards      9.3
 
          
EQUITY    
Common Stock – Par Value – $6.50 Per Share:         
  2017 2016     
Shares Authorized 600,000,000 600,000,000     
Shares Issued 512,048,663 512,048,520     
(20,206,368 and 20,336,592 Shares were Held in Treasury as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Respectively)  3,328.3
 3,328.3
Paid-in Capital      6,384.2
 6,332.6
Retained Earnings      8,532.0
 7,892.4
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  (175.4) (156.3)
TOTAL AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  18,069.1
 17,397.0
          
Noncontrolling Interests      36.4
 23.1
          
TOTAL EQUITY      18,105.5
 17,420.1
          
TOTAL LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND TOTAL EQUITY $63,964.9
 $63,467.7
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.
   June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Accounts Payable$2,433.9 $2,670.8 
Short-term Debt:  
Securitized Debt for Receivables – AEP Credit750.0 750.0 
Other Short-term Debt3,117.6 3,362.2 
Total Short-term Debt3,867.6 4,112.2 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $196.2 and $218.2, Respectively, Related to Sabine, DCC Fuel, Transition Funding, Restoration Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding and Transource Energy)
3,380.3 2,486.4 
Risk Management Liabilities176.2 145.2 
Customer Deposits382.2 408.8 
Accrued Taxes1,366.5 1,714.6 
Accrued Interest402.9 336.5 
Obligations Under Operating Leases116.6 113.6 
Liabilities Held for Sale64.8 — 
Other Current Liabilities1,076.1 1,278.2 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES13,267.1 13,266.3 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $591.3 and $755.3, Respectively, Related to Sabine, DCC Fuel, Transition Funding, Restoration Funding, Appalachian Consumer Rate Relief Funding and Transource Energy)
36,762.0 34,314.6 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities275.3 345.2 
Deferred Income Taxes9,157.7 8,896.9 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits8,121.1 8,115.6 
Asset Retirement Obligations2,879.9 2,879.3 
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations248.9 257.3 
Obligations Under Operating Leases533.6 552.5 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities568.2 607.3 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES58,546.7 55,968.7 
TOTAL LIABILITIES71,813.8 69,235.0 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
MEZZANINE EQUITY
Contingently Redeemable Performance Share Awards64.7 45.9 
TOTAL MEZZANINE EQUITY64.7 45.9 
EQUITY  
Common Stock – Par Value – $6.50 Per Share:  
20232022  
Shares Authorized600,000,000600,000,000  
Shares Issued526,387,081525,099,321  
(11,233,240 Shares were Held in Treasury as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, Respectively)3,421.5 3,413.1 
Paid-in Capital8,110.8 8,051.0 
Retained Earnings12,405.5 12,345.6 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(36.4)83.7 
TOTAL AEP COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY23,901.4 23,893.4 
Noncontrolling Interests222.2 229.0 
TOTAL EQUITY24,123.6 24,122.4 
TOTAL LIABILITIES, MEZZANINE EQUITY AND TOTAL EQUITY$96,002.1 $93,403.3 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
51




AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$916.5 $1,238.9 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Depreciation and Amortization1,517.1 1,595.0 
Deferred Income Taxes135.8 21.4 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewable Portfolio112.0 — 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Kentucky Operations— 68.8 
Impairment of Equity Method Investment— 185.5 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(72.3)(59.6)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts(124.7)431.4 
Property Taxes202.7 191.6 
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net342.5 (599.5)
Gain on Sale of Mineral Rights— (116.3)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets(375.5)(49.3)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(55.4)144.5 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net277.8 (445.8)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies(315.1)(110.5)
Accounts Payable62.6 484.8 
Accrued Taxes, Net(433.7)(218.2)
Other Current Assets(76.6)69.9 
Other Current Liabilities(232.1)158.1 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities1,881.6 2,990.7 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(4,049.7)(3,138.1)
Purchases of Investment Securities(1,235.6)(1,254.8)
Sales of Investment Securities1,206.3 1,244.9 
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel(73.9)(67.7)
Acquisitions of Renewable Energy Facilities(145.7)(1,207.3)
Proceeds from Sales of Assets1.0 208.5 
Other Investing Activities32.1 15.5 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(4,265.5)(4,199.0)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Issuance of Common Stock77.6 812.7 
Issuance of Long-term Debt3,958.8 2,639.1 
Issuance of Short-term Debt with Original Maturities greater than 90 Days597.4 271.0 
Change in Short-term Debt with Original Maturities less than 90 Days, Net(688.2)(268.9)
Retirement of Long-term Debt(641.7)(582.4)
Redemption of Short-term Debt with Original Maturities Greater than 90 Days(153.8)(486.1)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(40.6)(106.2)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(863.6)(803.5)
Other Financing Activities(67.8)(97.6)
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities2,178.1 1,378.1 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(205.8)169.8 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period556.5 451.4 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period$350.7 $621.2 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$773.5 $591.2 
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes9.9 95.5 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases25.6 13.7 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,966.6 849.1 
Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,(36.0)— 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
52
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $1,527.1
 $242.8
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax 
 (2.5)
Income from Continuing Operations 1,527.1
 245.3
Adjustments to Reconcile Income from Continuing Operations to Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities:    
Depreciation and Amortization 1,485.9
 1,550.2
Deferred Income Taxes 740.9
 (47.0)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 10.6
 2,264.9
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (62.2) (86.1)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts (56.2) 56.6
Amortization of Nuclear Fuel 104.8
 109.7
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust (93.3) (84.8)
Property Taxes 291.4
 288.3
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net 81.0
 (28.5)
Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets (226.4) 
Gain on Sale of Equity Investment (12.4) 
Recovery of Ohio Capacity Costs 65.6
 108.8
Provision for Refund  Global Settlement, Net

 (93.3) 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (345.2) (243.4)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 205.7
 41.3
Changes in Certain Components of Continuing Working Capital:    
Accounts Receivable, Net 201.3
 (240.8)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies 58.5
 11.6
Accounts Payable (91.0) 47.8
Accrued Taxes, Net (310.1) (393.0)
Other Current Assets (98.2) 31.5
Other Current Liabilities (260.3) (211.4)
Net Cash Flows from Continuing Operating Activities 3,124.2
 3,421.0
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction Expenditures (3,778.2) (3,387.0)
Change in Other Temporary Investments, Net 34.5
 109.2
Purchases of Investment Securities (1,855.8) (2,454.5)
Sales of Investment Securities 1,808.6
 2,427.0
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel (73.2) (127.6)
Proceeds from Sale of Merchant Generation Assets 2,159.6
 
Other Investing Activities 27.9
 4.2
Net Cash Flows Used for Continuing Investing Activities (1,676.6) (3,428.7)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Issuance of Common Stock 
 34.2
Issuance of Long-term Debt 2,742.7
 1,559.6
Change in Short-term Debt, Net (653.7) 678.3
Retirement of Long-term Debt (2,427.2) (1,307.6)
Make Whole Premium on Extinguishment of Long-term Debt (46.1) 
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (50.5) (81.9)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (875.0) (829.8)
Other Financing Activities (4.4) (6.8)
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Continuing Financing Activities (1,314.2) 46.0
     
Net Cash Flows Used for Discontinued Operating Activities 
 (2.5)
Net Cash Flows from Discontinued Investing Activities 
 
Net Cash Flows from Discontinued Financing Activities 
 
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 133.4
 35.8
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 210.5
 176.4
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $343.9
 $212.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.




AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLCTEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days

Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:  
Residential3,082 3,531 5,614 6,374 
Commercial3,443 3,091 6,187 5,239 
Industrial3,171 3,023 6,279 5,450 
Miscellaneous153 173 291 314 
Total Retail9,849 9,818 18,371 17,377 

Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.

Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)— 143 278 
Normal – Heating (b)197 193 
Actual – Cooling (c)955 1,135 1,226 1,223 
Normal – Cooling (b)940 925 1,067 1,051 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 70 degree temperature base.













53


AEP Texas Inc. and Subsidiaries
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$90.0 $159.6 
  
Changes in Revenues:
Retail Revenues(37.1)(35.5)
Transmission Revenues20.1 32.5 
Other Revenues(0.6)(1.8)
Total Change in Revenues(17.6)(4.8)
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance46.6 23.7 
Depreciation and Amortization1.3 (0.9)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes(1.8)(8.0)
Interest Income(0.7)(0.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction1.6 3.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost0.7 1.3 
Interest Expense(4.0)(15.4)
Total Change in Expenses and Other43.7 3.9 
  
Income Tax Expense(7.0)(2.0)
  
2023 Net Income$109.1 $156.7 

Second Quarter of 2023 Compared to Second Quarter of 2022

The major components of the decrease in revenues were as follows:

Retail Revenues decreased $37 million primarily due to the following:
A $19 million decrease in revenue from rate riders primarily due to a historical period over recovery. This decrease is partially offset in Other Operations and Maintenance expenses below.
An $11 million decrease in weather-normalized revenues in all retail classes.
An $8 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 16% decrease in cooling degree days.
Transmission Revenues increased $20 million primarily due to the following:
A $14 million increase due to increased load.
A $6 million increase in interim rates driven by increased transmission investments.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $47 million primarily due to the following:
A $28 million decrease due to legislation passed in Texas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
An $18 million decrease in ERCOT transmission expenses. This increase was offset in Retail Revenues above.
Interest Expense increased $4 million due to higher long term debt balances and higher interest rates.
Income Tax Expense increased $7 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.

54


Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
The major components of the decrease in revenues were as follows:

Retail Revenues decreased $36 million primarily due to the following:
A $24 million decrease in weather-normalized revenues in all retail classes.
An $8 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 49% decrease in heating degree days.
Transmission Revenues increased $33 million primarily due to the following:
An $18 million increase in interim rates driven by increased transmission investment.
A $14 million increase due to increased load.

Expenses and Other changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $24 million primarily due to the following:
A $28 million decrease due to legislation passed in Texas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
A $5 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
A $4 million decrease in ERCOT transmission expenses. This increase was offset in Retail Revenues above.
These decreases were partially offset by:
An $11 million increase in distribution-related expenses.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $8 million primarily due to higher property taxes driven by increased distribution and transmission investment.
Interest Expense increased $15 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and higher interest rates.

55



AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
  2023 202220232022
REVENUES    
Electric Transmission and Distribution $459.4 $476.9 $887.1 $891.6 
Sales to AEP Affiliates 1.3 0.8 2.5 1.7 
Other Revenues 0.5 1.1 1.1 2.2 
TOTAL REVENUES 461.2 478.8 890.7 895.5 
 
EXPENSES     
Other Operation 93.9 142.0 240.8 267.8 
Maintenance 26.3 24.8 50.7 47.4 
Depreciation and Amortization 114.9 116.2 225.9 225.0 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 44.8 43.0 88.3 80.3 
TOTAL EXPENSES 279.9 326.0 605.7 620.5 
 
OPERATING INCOME 181.3 152.8 285.0 275.0 
 
Other Income (Expense):     
Interest Income 0.6 1.3 1.0 1.4 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction5.3 3.7 11.6 8.0 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost4.8 4.1 9.6 8.3 
Interest Expense (56.3)(52.3)(113.2)(97.8)
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 135.7 109.6 194.0 194.9 
 
Income Tax Expense 26.6 19.6 37.3 35.3 
NET INCOME $109.1 $90.0 $156.7 $159.6 
The common stock of AEP Texas is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
56


AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
Net Income$109.1 $90.0 $156.7 $159.6 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0.8 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $0.8 and $0.1 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively3.2 0.2 3.2 0.5 
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $0 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.1) and $0 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively— — (0.6)— 
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME3.2 0.2 2.6 0.5 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$112.3 $90.2 $159.3 $160.1 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.

57


AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021$1,553.9 $2,046.8 $(6.5)$3,594.2 
Net Income69.6 69.6 
Other Comprehensive Income0.3 0.3 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20221,553.9 2,116.4 (6.2)3,664.1 
Capital Contribution from Parent1.3  1.3 
Net Income 90.0  90.0 
Other Comprehensive Income  0.2 0.2 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022$1,555.2 $2,206.4 $(6.0)$3,755.6 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022$1,558.2 $2,354.7 $(8.6)$3,904.3 
Capital Contribution from Parent100.0 100.0 
Net Income47.6 47.6 
Other Comprehensive Loss(0.6)(0.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20231,658.2 2,402.3 (9.2)4,051.3 
Capital Contribution from Parent175.3 175.3 
Return of Capital to Parent(4.3)(4.3)
Net Income 109.1 109.1 
Other Comprehensive Income 3.2 3.2 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023$1,829.2 $2,511.4 $(6.0)$4,334.6 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.

58


AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  June 30,December 31,
  2023 2022
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents$0.1 $0.1 
Restricted Cash
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $30.7 and $32.7, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding and Restoration Funding)
30.7 32.7 
Advances to Affiliates6.9 6.9 
Accounts Receivable:   
Customers 173.2 150.9 
Affiliated Companies 22.9 11.9 
Accrued Unbilled Revenues91.6 91.4 
Miscellaneous 0.5 0.2 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts(4.9)(4.2)
Total Accounts Receivable 283.3 250.2 
Materials and Supplies 157.3 138.8 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 8.9 18.2 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 487.2 446.9 
 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT   
Electric:   
Transmission 6,487.9 6,301.5 
Distribution 5,572.7 5,312.8 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 1,098.3 1,022.8 
Construction Work in Progress 984.9 805.2 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 14,143.8 13,442.3 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 1,829.1 1,760.7 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET 12,314.7 11,681.6 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS   
Regulatory Assets 326.5 298.3 
Securitized Assets
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $247.8 and $286.4, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding and Restoration Funding)
247.8 286.4 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 238.2 179.0 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 812.5 763.7 
 
TOTAL ASSETS $13,614.4 $12,892.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
59


AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  June 30,December 31,
  2023 2022
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
Advances from Affiliates $135.9 $96.5 
Accounts Payable: 
General 247.2 331.0 
Affiliated Companies 34.3 34.7 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $94.7 and $93.5, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding and Restoration Funding)
154.7 278.5 
Accrued Taxes 138.7 95.5 
Accrued Interest
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $2.1 and $2.2, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding and Restoration Funding)
50.5 48.3 
Obligations Under Operating Leases29.8 28.6 
Other Current Liabilities 132.6 130.7 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 923.7 1,043.8 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES   
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $177 and $221, Respectively, Related to Transition Funding and Restoration Funding)
5,782.8 5,379.3 
Deferred Income Taxes 1,180.3 1,144.2 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 1,250.6 1,259.6 
Obligations Under Operating Leases59.2 67.8 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 83.2 93.2 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 8,356.1 7,944.1 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 9,279.8 8,987.9 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY   
Paid-in Capital 1,829.2 1,558.2 
Retained Earnings 2,511.4 2,354.7 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(6.0)(8.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 4,334.6 3,904.3 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY $13,614.4 $12,892.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
60


AEP TEXAS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Six Months Ended June 30,
  2023 2022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net Income $156.7 $159.6 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:   
Depreciation and Amortization 225.9 225.0 
Deferred Income Taxes 28.5 24.6 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(11.6)(8.0)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts 0.4 (0.2)
Property Taxes(60.0)(54.8)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (89.7)(25.9)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 7.8 32.1 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net (33.1)(70.3)
Materials and Supplies (18.5)(24.1)
Accounts Payable 1.9 17.9 
Accrued Taxes, Net50.2 34.0 
Other Current Assets 2.9 (0.8)
Other Current Liabilities (34.4)31.9 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 227.0 341.0 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Construction Expenditures (834.2)(647.6)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net— (634.0)
Other Investing Activities20.2 22.3 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (814.0)(1,259.3)
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
Capital Contribution from Parent275.3 1.3 
Return of Capital to Parent(4.3)— 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated445.9 1,188.6 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net 39.4 (26.9)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated (168.2)(242.0)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations (3.7)(3.4)
Other Financing Activities0.6 — 
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 585.0 917.6 
Net Decrease in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash (2.0)(0.7)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at Beginning of Period 32.8 30.5 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period $30.8 $29.8 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION   
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $108.3 $88.8 
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes 0.7 5.9 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases 2.6 3.0 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30, 147.2 135.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
61


AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary of Investment in Transmission Assets for AEPTCo
As of June 30,
20232022
(in millions)
Plant In Service$13,269.6 $11,829.5 
Construction Work in Progress1,918.9 1,687.6 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization1,150.8 901.0 
Total Transmission Property, Net$14,037.7 $12,616.1 
  As of September 30,
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
Plant In Service $4,684.4
 $3,260.7
CWIP 1,383.1
 1,328.6
Accumulated Depreciation 151.5
 86.6
Total Transmission Property, Net $5,916.0
 $4,502.7


AEP Transmission Company, LLC and Subsidiaries
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$118.5 $273.9 
Changes in Transmission Revenues:
Transmission Revenues80.5 121.7 
Total Change in Transmission Revenues80.5 121.7 
Changes in Expenses and Other:
Other Operation and Maintenance2.7 (2.4)
Depreciation and Amortization(10.7)(22.8)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes0.7 (8.5)
Interest Income2.4 3.8 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction7.8 8.6 
Interest Expense(11.4)(18.9)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(8.5)(40.2)
Income Tax Expense(14.8)(17.0)
2023 Net Income$175.7 $338.4 
Third
Second Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022

The major component of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and nonaffiliates was as follows:

Transmission Revenues increased $80 million primarily due to the following:
A $41 million increase due to continued investment in transmission assets.
A $33 million increase due to affiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expense across the other Registrant Subsidiaries.
A $6 million increase due to nonaffiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity.
62


Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $52.4
   
Changes in Transmission Revenues:  
Transmission Revenues 42.0
Total Change in Transmission Revenues 42.0
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (10.4)
Depreciation and Amortization (8.0)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (4.9)
Interest Income 0.1
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.6)
Interest Expense (5.9)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (30.7)
   
Income Tax Expense (3.8)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $59.9
Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $11 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction increased $8 million primarily due to higher AFUDC equity rates and CWIP.
Interest Expense increased $11 million due to higher long-term debt balances and interest rates.
Income Tax Expense increased $15 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022

The major components of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliatesnonaffiliates were as follows:


Transmission Revenues increased $42$122 million primarily due to a $40the following:
An $83 million increase in formula rates driven bydue to continued investment in transmission assets.

A $33 million increase due to affiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expense across the other Registrant Subsidiaries.
A $6 million increase due to nonaffiliated transmission formula rate true-up activity.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other OperationDepreciation and MaintenanceAmortization expenses increased $10$23 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxesincreased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $8$9 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $5 million primarily due to increased property taxes as a result of additionalincreased transmission investment.
Interest ExpenseAllowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction increased $6$9 million primarily due to higher outstandingAFUDC equity rates and CWIP.
Interest Expense increased $19 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances.
balances and interest rates.
Income Tax Expense increased $4$17 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.


63


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016


Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $153.0
   
Changes in Transmission Revenues:  
Transmission Revenues 191.4
Total Change in Transmission Revenues 191.4
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (19.8)
Depreciation and Amortization (23.4)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (16.6)
Interest Income 0.3
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (3.7)
Interest Expense (16.3)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (79.5)
   
Income Tax Expense (40.6)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $224.3


The major components of the increase in transmission revenues, which consists of wholesale sales to affiliates and non-affiliates were as follows:

Transmission Revenues increased $191 million primarily due to the current year favorable impact of the modification of the PJM OATT formula rates combined with an increase driven by continued investment in transmission assets.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $20 million primarily due to increased transmission investment.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $23 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $17 million primarily due to increased property taxes as a result of additional transmission investment.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $4 millionprimarily due to the FERC transmission complaint and an increase in the amount of short term debt, offset by an increase in the CWIP balance.
Interest Expense increased $16 million primarily due to higher outstanding long-term debt balances.
Income Tax Expense increased $41 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.





AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023 2022 2023 2022
REVENUES
Transmission Revenues$90.2 $85.6 $180.2 $172.6 
Sales to AEP Affiliates365.8 333.9 723.2 658.9 
Provision for Refund – Affiliated(8.3)(46.8)(13.1)(56.4)
Provision for Refund – Nonaffiliated(2.8)(8.3)(3.8)(10.3)
TOTAL REVENUES444.9 364.4 886.5 764.8 
EXPENSES    
Other Operation26.4 29.6 55.4 55.1 
Maintenance4.3 3.8 9.2 7.1 
Depreciation and Amortization96.4 85.7 191.6 168.8 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes68.0 68.7 142.8 134.3 
TOTAL EXPENSES195.1 187.8 399.0 365.3 
OPERATING INCOME249.8 176.6 487.5 399.5 
Other Income (Expense):    
Interest Income - Affiliated2.6 0.2 4.1 0.3 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction23.1 15.3 39.5 30.9 
Interest Expense(50.7)(39.3)(95.9)(77.0)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE224.8 152.8 435.2 353.7 
Income Tax Expense49.1 34.3 96.8 79.8 
NET INCOME$175.7 $118.5 $338.4 $273.9 
AEPTCo is wholly-owned by AEP Transmission Holdco.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
64
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Transmission Revenues $35.9
 $33.5
 $99.2
 $89.6
Sales to AEP Affiliates 131.4
 91.8
 450.2
 268.4
TOTAL REVENUES 167.3
 125.3
 549.4
 358.0
         
EXPENSES  
    
  
Other Operation 18.4
 7.5
 38.8
 21.0
Maintenance 1.4
 1.9
 6.8
 4.8
Depreciation and Amortization 24.8
 16.8
 70.9
 47.5
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 27.6
 22.7
 82.0
 65.4
TOTAL EXPENSES 72.2
 48.9
 198.5
 138.7
         
OPERATING INCOME 95.1
 76.4
 350.9
 219.3
         
Other Income (Expense):  
    
  
Interest Income 0.2
 0.1
 0.5
 0.2
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 11.7
 13.3
 36.0
 39.7
Interest Expense (16.9) (11.0) (48.6) (32.3)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 90.1
 78.8
 338.8
 226.9
         
Income Tax Expense 30.2
 26.4
 114.5
 73.9
         
NET INCOME $59.9
 $52.4
 $224.3
 $153.0


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 118.


AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN MEMBER’S EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021 $2,949.6 $2,426.5 $5,376.1 
  
Dividends Paid to Member(40.0)(40.0)
Net Income 155.4 155.4 
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20222,949.6 2,541.9 5,491.5 
Capital Contribution from Member2.8 2.8 
Dividends Paid to Member(50.0)(50.0)
Net Income118.5 118.5 
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022$2,952.4 $2,610.4 $5,562.8 
  
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022 $3,022.3 $2,850.7 $5,873.0 
Capital Contribution from Member25.0 25.0 
Dividends Paid to Member(55.0)(55.0)
Net Income162.7 162.7 
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20233,047.3 2,958.4 6,005.7 
  
Return of Capital to Member(8.6)(8.6)
Dividends Paid to Member(30.0)(30.0)
Net Income175.7 175.7 
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023$3,038.7 $3,104.1 $6,142.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
65
  Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Total Member’s Equity
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2015 $1,243.0
 $309.9
 $1,552.9
       
Capital Contributions from Member 116.0
   116.0
Net Income  
 153.0
 153.0
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 $1,359.0
 $462.9
 $1,821.9
       
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2016 $1,455.0
 $502.6
 $1,957.6
       
Capital Contributions from Member 185.5
   185.5
Net Income  
 224.3
 224.3
TOTAL MEMBER'S EQUITY – SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 $1,640.5
 $726.9
 $2,367.4


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 118.


AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  June 30, December 31,
  2023 2022
CURRENT ASSETS    
Advances to Affiliates $79.4 $4.4 
Accounts Receivable: 
Customers 91.1 46.9 
Affiliated Companies 179.4 119.5 
Total Accounts Receivable 270.5 166.4 
Materials and Supplies 15.5 10.7 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 1.8 7.2 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 367.2 188.7 
 
TRANSMISSION PROPERTY   
Transmission Property 12,780.0 12,335.4 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 489.6 476.8 
Construction Work in Progress 1,918.9 1,554.7 
Total Transmission Property 15,188.5 14,366.9 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 1,150.8 1,027.0 
TOTAL TRANSMISSION PROPERTY – NET 14,037.7 13,339.9 
 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS   
Regulatory Assets 5.8 7.2 
Deferred Property Taxes 155.9 266.6 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 9.9 11.8 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 171.6 285.6 
 
TOTAL ASSETS $14,576.5 $13,814.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
66
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Advances to Affiliates $290.9
 $67.1
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 19.5
 11.3
Affiliated Companies 102.8
 66.6
Total Accounts Receivable 122.3
 77.9
Materials and Supplies 16.0
 5.0
Accrued Tax Benefits 12.7
 26.0
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 8.1
 2.8
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 450.0
 178.8
     
TRANSMISSION PROPERTY    
Transmission Property 4,570.9
 3,973.5
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 113.5
 99.4
Construction Work in Progress 1,383.1
 981.3
Total Transmission Property 6,067.5
 5,054.2
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 151.5
 99.6
TOTAL TRANSMISSION PROPERTY  NET
 5,916.0
 4,954.6
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Accounts Receivable - Affiliated Companies 13.8
 
Regulatory Assets 138.0
 112.3
Deferred Property Taxes 29.8
 102.2
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 1.3
 1.9
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 182.9
 216.4
     
TOTAL ASSETS $6,548.9
 $5,349.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 118.


AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
  June 30, December 31,
  2023 2022
(in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $74.4 $229.3 
Accounts Payable:  
General 387.4 427.8 
Affiliated Companies 104.9 82.7 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated60.0 60.0 
Accrued Taxes 392.4 529.8 
Accrued Interest 40.1 28.8 
Obligations Under Operating Leases1.4 1.3 
Other Current Liabilities 12.3 8.3 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,072.9 1,368.0 
 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES   
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 5,413.0 4,722.8 
Deferred Income Taxes 1,107.3 1,056.5 
Regulatory Liabilities 768.9 723.3 
Obligations Under Operating Leases1.8 1.5 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 69.8 69.1 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 7,360.8 6,573.2 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 8,433.7 7,941.2 
 
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
MEMBER’S EQUITY   
Paid-in Capital3,038.7 3,022.3 
Retained Earnings 3,104.1 2,850.7 
TOTAL MEMBER’S EQUITY 6,142.8 5,873.0 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY $14,576.5 $13,814.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
67
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $32.8
 $4.1
Accounts Payable:    
General 233.2
 289.7
Affiliated Companies 50.0
 43.1
Accrued Taxes 112.5
 191.8
Accrued Interest 28.9
 10.5
Other Current Liabilities 10.4
 10.9
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 467.8
 550.1
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 2,550.0
 1,932.0
Deferred Income Taxes 1,073.1
 862.1
Regulatory Liabilities 60.5
 44.0
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 30.1
 4.0
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 3,713.7
 2,842.1
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,181.5
 3,392.2
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
MEMBER’S EQUITY    
Paid-in Capital 1,640.5
 1,455.0
Retained Earnings 726.9
 502.6
TOTAL MEMBER’S EQUITY 2,367.4
 1,957.6
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S EQUITY $6,548.9
 $5,349.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 118.


AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Six Months Ended June 30,
  20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
Net Income $338.4 $273.9 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities: 
Depreciation and Amortization 191.6 168.8 
Deferred Income Taxes 42.7 37.3 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (39.5)(30.9)
Property Taxes 110.7 101.4 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets 3.4 1.8 
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 1.7 44.3 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net (104.1)(36.7)
Materials and Supplies(4.8)(2.2)
Accounts Payable 64.6 13.1 
Accrued Taxes, Net (133.3)(107.6)
Other Current Assets 1.3 0.9 
Other Current Liabilities 10.2 (0.9)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 482.9 463.2 
 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Construction Expenditures (876.1)(730.9)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net (75.0)(109.8)
Other Investing Activities 2.6 (8.0)
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (948.5)(848.7)
 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Member 25.0 2.8 
Return of Capital to Member(8.6)— 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated689.1 540.9 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net (154.9)(68.2)
Dividends Paid to Member(85.0)(90.0)
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 465.6 385.5 
 
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents — — 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period — — 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $— $— 
 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION   
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $82.8 $74.0 
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes 32.0 39.7 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30, 238.4 228.7 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
68
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES    
Net Income $224.3
 $153.0
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:    
Depreciation and Amortization 70.9
 47.5
Deferred Income Taxes 193.0
 161.2
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (36.0) (39.7)
Property Taxes 72.4
 63.5
Long-term Accounts Receivable - Affiliated (13.8) 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets 7.6
 (6.4)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 25.7
 0.6
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:    
Accounts Receivable, Net (44.4) (43.3)
Materials and Supplies (11.0) (1.5)
Accounts Payable 8.6
 (1.7)
Accrued Taxes, Net (66.0) 61.2
Accrued Interest 18.4
 11.3
Other Current Assets (5.3) (0.1)
Other Current Liabilities 0.5
 0.1
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 444.9
 405.7
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
Construction Expenditures (1,050.7) (799.8)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net (223.8) 83.7
Other Investing Activities (2.9) (4.6)
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (1,277.4) (720.7)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Capital Contributions from Member 185.5
 116.0
Issuance of Long-term Debt - Nonaffiliated 618.3
 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net 28.7
 199.0
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 832.5
 315.0
     
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $
 $
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $28.6
 $20.0
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes (93.4) (209.8)
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 239.0
 204.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 118.




APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days


Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential1,987 2,223 5,046 5,755 
Commercial1,346 1,460 2,749 2,979 
Industrial2,135 2,225 4,244 4,444 
Miscellaneous190 205 390 418 
Total Retail5,658 6,113 12,429 13,596 
Wholesale514 262 1,003 625 
Total KWhs6,172 6,375 13,432 14,221 
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential2,488
 2,845
 7,829
 8,743
Commercial1,673
 1,823
 4,805
 5,125
Industrial2,431
 2,391
 7,106
 7,022
Miscellaneous202
 217
 613
 637
Total Retail6,794
 7,276
 20,353
 21,527
        
Wholesale994
 1,029
 2,684
 2,413
        
Total KWhs7,788
 8,305
 23,037
 23,940


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)69 94 928 1,368 
Normal – Heating (b)87 89 1,408 1,408 
Actual – Cooling (c)225 421 233 423 
Normal – Cooling (b)379 372 385 378 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.

69


 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Actual - Heating (a)
 
 1,000
 1,433
Normal - Heating (b)2
 2
 1,420
 1,437
        
Actual - Cooling (c)805
 1,049
 1,180
 1,437
Normal - Cooling (b)812
 808
 1,179
 1,177
Appalachian Power Company and Subsidiaries
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$90.2 $210.4 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins20.2 33.2 
Margins from Off-system Sales0.4 2.6 
Transmission Revenues2.4 2.6 
Other Revenues(2.3)(6.5)
Total Change in Gross Margin20.7 31.9 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance(46.7)(52.6)
Depreciation and Amortization4.8 7.0 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes(1.9)(3.5)
Interest Income0.5 1.0 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction0.1 0.5 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost1.0 1.8 
Interest Expense(11.8)(22.8)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(54.0)(68.6)
  
Income Tax Expense(14.0)(18.3)
  
2023 Net Income$42.9 $155.4 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.




ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
 
Third Quarter of 2016 $104.1
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (40.6)
Off-system Sales (1.0)
Transmission Revenues 1.8
Other Revenues 0.5
Total Change in Gross Margin (39.3)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 12.9
Depreciation and Amortization (4.7)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (0.3)
Carrying Costs Income 0.4
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.8)
Interest Expense (0.8)
Total Change in Expenses and Other 5.7
   
Income Tax Expense 15.5
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $86.0


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $41 increased $20 million primarily due to the following:
A $25$14 million increase due to a base rate increase in Virginia implemented in October 2022 following the Virginia Supreme Court remand. This increase was partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
A $9 million increase in deferred fuel primarily related to the timing of recoverable PJM expenses. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
An $8 million increase due to lower customer refunds related to Tax Reform. This increase was offset in Income Tax Expense below.
A $6 million increase due to rider revenues in Virginia and West Virginia. This increase was partially offset in other expense items below.
These increases were partially offset by:
An $18 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily driven by a 23%28% decrease in heating degree days and a 46% decrease in cooling degree days.
An $8 million decrease in weather-normalized margin occurring across all retail classes.
A $6 million decrease primarily due to a decrease in rates in West Virginia and Virginia. This decrease is partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.

70


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $13increased $47 million primarily due to the following:
A $14 million increase due to gains from the sale of land in 2022.
An $11 million increase in distribution expenses primarily due to storm restoration costs.
A $7 million decreaseincrease due to the amortization of the regulatory asset in storm-related expenses.accordance with the August 2022 Virginia Supreme Court opinion related to under-earnings during the 2017-2019 Triennial Review. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
A $4$6 million decreaseincrease in generation plant maintenance expenses.transmission expenses primarily due to formula rate true-up activity.
Depreciation and Amortization expensesInterest Expense increased $5$12 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
debt balances and interest rates.
Income Tax Expensedecreased $16 increased $14 million primarily due to the following:
A $14 million decrease in amortization of Excess ADIT. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
A $5 million increase in unfavorable discrete adjustments in 2023.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $7 million decrease due to a decrease in pretax book income and the recording of federal income tax adjustments.
income.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $303.8
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (93.7)
Off-system Sales (0.1)
Transmission Revenues 25.9
Other Revenues 3.2
Total Change in Gross Margin (64.7)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (8.3)
Depreciation and Amortization (14.1)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 0.6
Interest Income 0.3
Carrying Costs Income 0.8
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (2.9)
Interest Expense (2.8)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (26.4)
   
Income Tax Expense 36.0
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $248.7


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $94 increased $33 million primarily due to the following:
A $72$29 million increase due to a base rate increase in Virginia implemented in October 2022 following the Virginia Supreme Court remand. This increase was partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
A $17 million increase due to lower customer refunds related to Tax Reform. This increase was offset in Income Tax Expense below.
A $12 million increase in deferred fuel primarily related to the timing of recoverable PJM expenses. This increase was offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
An $11 million increase in weather-normalized margins primarily driven by increases in the residential class.
A $9 million increase due to rider revenues in Virginia and West Virginia. This increase was partially offset in other expense items below.
An $8 million increase due to lower amortization expenses related to the Virginia CCR. This increase was offset in other expense items below.
A $4 million increase driven by sales of renewable energy credits in Virginia.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $62 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily driven by a 30%32% decrease in heating degree days and an 18%a 45% decrease in cooling degree days.
A $14 million decrease primarily due to prior year recognition of deferred billing in West Virginia as approved by the WVPSC.
A $3 million decrease in weather-normalized margin primarily driven by the commercial class.
TransmissionOther Revenues increased $26 decreased $7 million primarily due to increase in formula rates driven by continued investment in transmission assets. This increase is partially offset in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
pole attachment revenue.


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $8$53 million primarily due to the following:
A $13$15 million increase in recoverable PJM transmission expenses.distribution expenses primarily due to storm restoration costs.
A $14 million increase due to the amortization of the regulatory asset in accordance with the August 2022 Virginia Supreme Court opinion related to under-earnings during the 2017-2019 Triennial Review. This increase was offset in expense is offset within Gross MarginRetail Margins above.
A $14 million increase due to gains from the sale of land in 2022.
A $6 million gain onincrease in accounts receivable factoring expenses as a result of increased interest rates.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $7 million primarily due to adjustments related to various retail riders. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
Interest Expense increased $23 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and interest rates.
71


Income Tax Expense increased $18 million primarily due to the salefollowing:
A $15 million decrease in amortization of propertyExcess ADIT. This decrease was partially offset in 2016.Retail Margins above.
A $10 million increase in unfavorable discrete adjustments in 2023.
These increases were partially offset by:
An $8 million decrease in storm-related expenses.
A $5 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $14 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Income Tax Expense decreased $36 million primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income and the recording of federal income tax adjustments.income.






72






APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
REVENUES    
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution$762.5 $704.9 $1,677.0 $1,552.0 
Sales to AEP Affiliates61.1 63.1 130.7 120.0 
Other Revenues2.9 5.6 6.5 8.9 
TOTAL REVENUES826.5 773.6 1,814.2 1,680.9 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation277.9 245.7 617.6 516.2 
Other Operation189.9 147.1 381.7 332.0 
Maintenance75.1 71.2 148.2 145.3 
Depreciation and Amortization138.1 142.9 281.1 288.1 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes41.2 39.3 83.0 79.5 
TOTAL EXPENSES722.2 646.2 1,511.6 1,361.1 
OPERATING INCOME104.3 127.4 302.6 319.8 
Other Income (Expense):    
Interest Income0.8 0.3 1.4 0.4 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction2.7 2.6 5.1 4.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost8.2 7.2 16.3 14.5 
Interest Expense(66.9)(55.1)(132.2)(109.4)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)49.1 82.4 193.2 229.9 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)6.2 (7.8)37.8 19.5 
NET INCOME$42.9 $90.2 $155.4 $210.4 
The common stock of APCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
73
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution $674.4
 $739.0
 $2,045.0
 $2,153.3
Sales to AEP Affiliates 41.9
 36.4
 130.6
 109.0
Other Revenues 3.0
 2.8
 11.8
 9.4
TOTAL REVENUES 719.3
 778.2
 2,187.4
 2,271.7
         
EXPENSES  
    
  
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation 178.6
 190.1
 498.3
 494.1
Purchased Electricity for Resale 61.1
 69.2
 217.1
 240.9
Other Operation 115.7
 117.6
 366.2
 349.4
Maintenance 55.8
 66.8
 187.8
 196.3
Depreciation and Amortization 102.8
 98.1
 304.1
 290.0
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 32.3
 32.0
 93.3
 93.9
TOTAL EXPENSES 546.3
 573.8
 1,666.8
 1,664.6
         
OPERATING INCOME 173.0
 204.4
 520.6
 607.1
         
Other Income (Expense):  
    
  
Interest Income 0.3
 0.3
 1.1
 0.8
Carrying Costs Income 0.4
 
 1.0
 0.2
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 2.7
 4.5
 6.2
 9.1
Interest Expense (47.2) (46.4) (143.5) (140.7)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 129.2
 162.8
 385.4
 476.5
         
Income Tax Expense 43.2
 58.7
 136.7
 172.7
         
NET INCOME $86.0
 $104.1
 $248.7
 $303.8


The common stock of APCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2023202220232022
Net Income$42.9 $90.2 $155.4 $210.4 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(0.2)(0.2)(0.4)(0.4)
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.2) and $(0.3) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.4) and $(0.6) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(0.8)(1.0)(1.6)(2.1)
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(1.0)(1.2)(2.0)(2.5)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$41.9 $89.0 $153.4 $207.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
74
  
  Three Months Ended
 Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income $86.0
 $104.1
 $248.7
 $303.8
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES    
  
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(0.3) and $(0.3) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively (0.1) (0.2) (0.5) (0.6)
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(0.4) and $(0.5) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively (0.3) (0.3) (0.9) (1.0)
         
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (0.4) (0.5) (1.4) (1.6)
         
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $85.6
 $103.6
 $247.3
 $302.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2021$260.4 $1,828.7 $2,534.4 $24.4 $4,647.9 
Common Stock Dividends(18.8)(18.8)
Net Income120.2 120.2 
Other Comprehensive Loss(1.3)(1.3)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - MARCH 31, 2022260.4 1,828.7 2,635.8 23.1 4,748.0 
Capital Contribution from Parent2.8 2.8 
Common Stock Dividends (18.7) (18.7)
Net Income  90.2  90.2 
Other Comprehensive Loss   (1.2)(1.2)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - JUNE 30, 2022$260.4 $1,831.5 $2,707.3 $21.9 $4,821.1 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2022$260.4 $1,828.7 $2,891.1 $(4.8)$4,975.4 
Net Income112.5 112.5 
Other Comprehensive Loss(1.0)(1.0)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - MARCH 31, 2023260.4 1,828.7 3,003.6 (5.8)5,086.9 
Capital Contribution from Parent4.34.3 
Net Income42.9 42.9 
Other Comprehensive Loss(1.0)(1.0)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - JUNE 30, 2023$260.4 $1,833.0 $3,046.5 $(6.8)$5,133.1 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.

75
  
Common
Stock
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015 $260.4
 $1,828.7
 $1,388.7
 $(2.8) $3,475.0
           
Common Stock Dividends  
  
 (225.0)  
 (225.0)
Net Income  
  
 303.8
  
 303.8
Other Comprehensive Loss  
  
  
 (1.6) (1.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 $260.4
 $1,828.7
 $1,467.5
 $(4.4) $3,552.2
           
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016 $260.4
 $1,828.7
 $1,502.8
 $(8.4) $3,583.5
           
Common Stock Dividends  
  
 (90.0)  
 (90.0)
Net Income  
  
 248.7
  
 248.7
Other Comprehensive Loss  
  
  
 (1.4) (1.4)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 $260.4
 $1,828.7
 $1,661.5
 $(9.8) $3,740.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
June 30,December 31,
20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$6.8 $7.5 
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding15.1 14.4 
Advances to Affiliates18.9 19.8 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers138.1 168.9 
Affiliated Companies121.5 94.0 
Accrued Unbilled Revenues35.6 91.3 
Miscellaneous0.5 0.3 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts(1.6)(1.7)
Total Accounts Receivable294.1 352.8 
Fuel267.1 158.9 
Materials and Supplies136.5 130.6 
Risk Management Assets39.2 69.1 
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs586.0 473.1 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets28.9 33.4 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS1,392.6 1,259.6 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Generation6,903.0 6,776.8 
Transmission4,536.9 4,482.8 
Distribution5,067.5 4,933.0 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment922.7 883.3 
Construction Work in Progress790.9 705.3 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment18,221.0 17,781.2 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization5,547.0 5,402.0 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET12,674.0 12,379.2 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets891.7 1,058.6 
Securitized Assets146.5 159.6 
Employee Benefits and Pension Assets161.9 152.9 
Operating Lease Assets67.9 73.6 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets123.4 138.7 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS1,391.4 1,583.4 
TOTAL ASSETS$15,458.0 $15,222.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
76
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents $2.9
 $2.7
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding 8.3
 15.8
Advances to Affiliates 23.6
 24.1
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 96.8
 131.4
Affiliated Companies 59.5
 54.4
Accrued Unbilled Revenues 41.1
 52.7
Miscellaneous 1.3
 0.9
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (2.7) (3.5)
Total Accounts Receivable 196.0
 235.9
Fuel 96.3
 112.0
Materials and Supplies 100.8
 98.8
Risk Management Assets 30.3
 2.6
Accrued Tax Benefits 0.4
 4.2
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs 63.5
 68.4
Margin Deposits 11.8
 17.5
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 18.2
 9.7
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 552.1
 591.7
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric:    
Generation 6,393.7
 6,332.8
Transmission 2,904.4
 2,796.9
Distribution 3,703.5
 3,569.1
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 409.8
 373.5
Construction Work in Progress 493.5
 390.3
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 13,904.9
 13,462.6
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 3,836.7
 3,636.8
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET
 10,068.2
 9,825.8
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Regulatory Assets 1,100.1
 1,121.1
Securitized Assets 288.0
 305.3
Long-term Risk Management Assets 0.6
 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 113.6
 133.3
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 1,502.3
 1,559.7
     
TOTAL ASSETS $12,122.6
 $11,977.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
 (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Advances from Affiliates$266.1 $182.2 
Accounts Payable:  
General324.3 451.2 
Affiliated Companies114.2 142.7 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated538.3 251.8 
Risk Management Liabilities1.1 3.6 
Customer Deposits75.3 75.1 
Accrued Taxes101.8 101.0 
Accrued Interest60.0 57.9 
Obligations Under Operating Leases14.3 15.0 
Other Current Liabilities108.6 109.7 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES1,604.0 1,390.2 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated5,061.4 5,158.7 
Deferred Income Taxes2,007.9 1,992.2 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits1,094.5 1,143.6 
Asset Retirement Obligations419.7 419.2 
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations33.7 34.2 
Obligations Under Operating Leases54.0 59.1 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities49.7 49.6 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES8,720.9 8,856.6 
TOTAL LIABILITIES10,324.9 10,246.8 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY  
Common Stock – No Par Value:  
Authorized – 30,000,000 Shares  
 Outstanding – 13,499,500 Shares260.4 260.4 
Paid-in Capital1,833.0 1,828.7 
Retained Earnings3,046.5 2,891.1 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(6.8)(4.8)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY5,133.1 4,975.4 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY$15,458.0 $15,222.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
77
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $69.5
 $79.6
Accounts Payable:  
  
General 235.4
 253.7
Affiliated Companies 75.5
 82.6
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year - Nonaffiliated 149.2
 503.1
Risk Management Liabilities 0.9
 0.3
Customer Deposits 84.0
 83.1
Accrued Taxes 64.0
 107.6
Accrued Interest 71.4
 40.6
Other Current Liabilities 99.2
 129.5
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 849.1
 1,280.1
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt - Nonaffiliated 3,830.1
 3,530.8
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 0.3
 0.9
Deferred Income Taxes 2,796.7
 2,672.3
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 634.4
 627.8
Asset Retirement Obligations 101.2
 108.8
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations 92.2
 108.5
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 77.8
 64.5
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 7,532.7
 7,113.6
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 8,381.8
 8,393.7
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY    
Common Stock – No Par Value:    
Authorized – 30,000,000 Shares  
  
Outstanding – 13,499,500 Shares 260.4
 260.4
Paid-in Capital 1,828.7
 1,828.7
Retained Earnings 1,661.5
 1,502.8
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (9.8) (8.4)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 3,740.8
 3,583.5
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY $12,122.6
 $11,977.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$155.4 $210.4 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Depreciation and Amortization281.1 288.1 
Deferred Income Taxes(2.8)17.1 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(5.1)(4.6)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts27.4 (38.5)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net54.2 (312.1)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets7.7 (42.3)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(39.3)(0.2)
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net60.4 65.4 
Fuel, Materials and Supplies(113.4)(75.4)
Margin Deposits(11.7)64.5 
Accounts Payable(128.7)162.8 
Accrued Taxes, Net13.4 (5.7)
Other Current Assets5.1 0.7 
Other Current Liabilities(20.8)(0.7)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities282.9 329.5 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(558.2)(450.8)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net0.9 1.4 
Other Investing Activities2.7 23.3 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(554.6)(426.1)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Parent4.3 2.8 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated200.0 103.3 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net83.9 149.9 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated(13.0)(117.1)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(4.1)(4.0)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock— (37.5)
Other Financing Activities0.6 0.2 
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities271.7 97.6 
Net Increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding— 1.0 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding at Beginning of Period21.9 20.1 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding at End of Period$21.9 $21.1 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$125.9 $104.9 
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes23.4 1.0 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases1.7 0.5 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,139.6 121.2 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
78
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $248.7
 $303.8
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
  
Depreciation and Amortization 304.1
 290.0
Deferred Income Taxes 121.7
 100.9
Carrying Costs Income (1.0) (0.2)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (6.2) (9.1)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts (28.3) 18.4
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust (10.2) (8.8)
Property Taxes 29.8
 29.2
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net 4.9
 19.0
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets 8.3
 (5.1)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 7.9
 (23.0)
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
  
Accounts Receivable, Net 39.9
 (20.5)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies 14.0
 (1.2)
Accounts Payable 6.2
 4.9
Accrued Taxes, Net (44.2) (13.9)
Other Current Assets (2.5) (0.2)
Other Current Liabilities 9.1
 (4.1)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 702.2
 680.1
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
Construction Expenditures (560.0) (472.7)
Change in Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding 7.5
 7.0
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net 0.5
 1.2
Other Investing Activities 11.8
 10.6
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (540.2) (453.9)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
Issuance of Long-term Debt - Nonaffiliated 320.9
 314.1
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net (10.1) (96.9)
Retirement of Long-term Debt - Nonaffiliated (377.9) (213.6)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (5.2) (4.7)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (90.0) (225.0)
Other Financing Activities 0.5
 0.4
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities (161.8) (225.7)
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 0.2
 0.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 2.7
 2.8
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $2.9
 $3.3
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $107.1
 $113.2
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes 24.4
 55.8
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 2.9
 2.1
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 107.2
 66.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.




INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days


Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential1,114 1,249 2,577 2,788 
Commercial1,207 1,165 2,396 2,284 
Industrial1,821 1,922 3,625 3,712 
Miscellaneous11 11 27 27 
Total Retail4,153 4,347 8,625 8,811 
Wholesale1,547 1,228 2,964 3,185 
Total KWhs5,700 5,575 11,589 11,996 
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential1,404
 1,619
 4,015
 4,344
Commercial1,313
 1,405
 3,640
 3,780
Industrial1,978
 1,996
 5,793
 5,876
Miscellaneous16
 15
 50
 50
Total Retail4,711
 5,035
 13,498
 14,050
        
Wholesale2,807
 2,613
 8,567
 7,038
        
Total KWhs7,518
 7,648
 22,065
 21,088


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)227 268 1,914 2,508 
Normal – Heating (b)241 242 2,423 2,413 
Actual – Cooling (c)206 344 206 344 
Normal – Cooling (b)268 261 269 262 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
79


 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Actual - Heating (a)
 
 1,816
 2,196
Normal - Heating (b)11
 10
 2,430
 2,449
        
Actual - Cooling (c)504
 741
 764
 1,011
Normal - Cooling (b)574
 571
 835
 835
Indiana Michigan Power Company and Subsidiaries
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$67.2 $156.7 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins9.9 50.2 
Margins from Off-system Sales8.9 23.6 
Transmission Revenues(8.9)(12.6)
Other Revenues(2.2)2.8 
Total Change in Gross Margin7.7 64.0 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance(17.2)(55.2)
Depreciation and Amortization22.7 32.4 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes8.0 13.7 
Other Income0.6 (1.4)
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost1.5 3.2 
Interest Expense(4.8)(7.7)
Total Change in Expenses and Other10.8 (15.0)
  
Income Tax Expense(10.9)(28.1)
  
2023 Net Income$74.8 $177.6 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.



ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $75.4
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (4.4)
Transmission Revenues (6.2)
Other Revenues (1.5)
Total Change in Gross Margin (12.1)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (7.4)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization (5.9)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (1.4)
Other Income 0.1
Interest Expense (0.8)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (4.9)
   
Income Tax Expense 6.5
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $64.9

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $4 increased $10 million primarily due to the following:
An $18A $13 million increase in deferred fuel primarily due to recoverable PJM expenses that are offset below.
A $10 million increase due to a reduction in provision for refund offset by lower wholesale true-ups.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $14 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 32%40% decrease in cooling degree days.
A $6 million decrease in weather-normalized margins.
A $5 million decrease in FERC generation wholesale municipal and cooperative revenues primarily due to formula rate adjustments.
A $2 million decrease due toMargins from Off-system Sales increased costs for power acquired under the Unit Power Agreement between AEGCo and I&M.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $13 million increase from rate proceedings in the I&M service territory. The increase in retail margins relating to riders has corresponding increases in other items below.
A $9 million increase related to over/under recovery of riders.
A $2 million decrease in PJM related expenses primarily due to reduced FTRs.
Transmission Revenues decreased $6 million primarily due to an annualRockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations activity.
Transmission Revenues decreased $9 million primarily due to transmission formula rate true-up and reduced net PJM Network Integration Transmission Service revenues resulting from increased affiliated transmission-related charges.
activity.




Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $7$17 million primarily due to the following:
A $9$7 million increase in Transmission Expenses primarily due to transmission formula rate true-up activity.
A $7 million increase in Demand Side Management Rider expenses primarily due to an increase in recoverable PJM expenses.revenues collected from customers. This increase in expense iswas partially offset withinin Retail Margins above.
A $3Depreciation and Amortizationexpensesdecreased $23 million increase in nuclear expenses primarily due to the expiration of the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease in December 2022, partially offset by an increase in refueling outage amortization and refueling outage expenses not deferred, partially offset by a decrease in employee-related expenses.depreciation expense due to the acquisition of Rockport Plant, Unit 2 at the end of the lease.
These increases were partially offset by:
80


A $3Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $8 million decrease in distribution expenses primarily due to decreased vegetation management.the repeal of the Indiana Utility Receipts Tax in July 2022. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $11 million due to the impairment of I&M’s Price River coal reserves in 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization expensesInterest Expenseincreased $6$5 million primarily due to higher depreciable base.
long-term debt balances and higher interest rates.
Income Tax Expense decreased $7increased $11 million primarily due to athe following:
A $6 million decrease in amortization of Excess ADIT.
A $4 million increase due to higher pretax book income and the regulatory accounting treatment of state income taxes.
income.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $201.4
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (11.2)
Off-system Sales 0.5
Transmission Revenues (23.0)
Other Revenues (2.1)
Total Change in Gross Margin (35.8)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (39.3)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization (11.6)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 3.2
Other Income (0.4)
Interest Expense (6.7)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (44.3)
   
Income Tax Expense 22.5
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $143.8

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $11 increased $50 million primarily due to the following:
A $33$25 million increase in weather-normalized margins primarily in the residential and commercial classes, offset by a decrease in FERC generationthe wholesale municipalclass.
A $21 million increase due to a reduction in provision for refund partially offset by lower wholesale true-ups.
A $17 million increase due to a base rate revenue increase in Indiana and cooperative revenuesrider increases. This increase is partially offset in other expense items below.
A $13 million increase in deferred fuel primarily due to an annual formula rate true-up and other rate adjustments.recoverable PJM expenses that are offset below.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $29$32 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 24% decrease in coolingheating degree days and a 17%40% decrease in heatingcooling degree days.
An $11 million decrease in weather-normalized margins.
A $5 million decrease due toMargins from Off-system Sales increased costs for power acquired under the Unit Power Agreement between AEGCo and I&M.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $47 million increase from rate proceedings in the I&M service territory. The increase in retail margins relating to riders has corresponding increases in other items below.
A $19 million increase related to over/under recovery of riders.
A $2 million decrease in PJM related expenses primarily due to reduced FTRs.
Transmission Revenues decreased $23$24 million primarily due to an annualRockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations activity and estimated PJM performance incentives for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 merchant operations related to winter storm Elliott in December 2022.
Transmission Revenues decreased $13 million primarily due to transmission formula rate true-up and reduced net PJM Network Integration Transmission Service revenues resulting from increased affiliated transmission-related charges.
activity.



Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $39$55 million primarily due to the following:
A $38$16 million increase in Demand Side Management Rider expenses primarily due to an increase in revenues collected from customers. This increase was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
A $10 million increase in nuclear expenses at Cook Plant primarily due to refueling outage expenses.
A $9 million increase due to a decreased Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited distribution in 2023.
An $8 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to an increase in recoverable PJM expenses. This increase in expense was offset within Retail Margins above.transmission formula rate true-up activity.
A $7 million increase in nuclear expenses primarily due to an increase in refueling outage amortization, partially offset by refueling outage expenses not deferred, a decrease in employee-related expenses and material write-off.
A $3 million increase in distribution expenses primarily due to increased vegetation management.
These increases were partially offset by:
An $8 million decrease primarily due to employee-related expenses.
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges decreased $11 million due to the impairment of I&M’s Price River coal reserves in 2016.
Depreciation and Amortization expensesincreased $12decreased $32 million primarily due to higherthe expiration of the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease in December 2022, partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense due to the acquisition of Rockport Plant, Unit 2 at the end of the lease and an increase in depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxesdecreased $3$14 million primarily due to property taxes.
the repeal of the Indiana Utility Receipts Tax in July 2022. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
Interest Expenseincreased $7$8 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances.
balances and higher interest rates.
Income Tax Expense decreased $23 increased $28 million primarily due to athe following:
A $12 million decrease in amortization of Excess ADIT.
A $10 million increase due to higher pretax book income, partially offset by the recording of favorable federal income tax adjustmentsincome.
A $4 million increase in 2016.state taxes.
81






INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
REVENUES    
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution$580.4 $604.4 $1,223.2 $1,216.4 
Sales to AEP Affiliates1.9 7.1 3.1 9.1 
Other Revenues – Affiliated14.5 16.7 30.4 25.1 
Other Revenues – Nonaffiliated2.4 2.8 5.5 5.6 
TOTAL REVENUES599.2 631.0 1,262.2 1,256.2 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation93.9 110.9 193.1 216.6 
Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates37.1 59.6 82.2 116.7 
Other Operation170.1 149.2 339.8 288.5 
Maintenance57.1 60.8 115.7 111.8 
Depreciation and Amortization111.0 133.7 236.2 268.6 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes20.6 28.6 40.1 53.8 
TOTAL EXPENSES489.8 542.8 1,007.1 1,056.0 
OPERATING INCOME109.4 88.2 255.1 200.2 
Other Income (Expense):    
Other Income3.0 2.4 3.6 5.0 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost7.7 6.2 15.7 12.5 
Interest Expense(35.8)(31.0)(69.0)(61.3)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)84.3 65.8 205.4 156.4 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)9.5 (1.4)27.8 (0.3)
NET INCOME$74.8 $67.2 $177.6 $156.7 
The common stock of I&M is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
82
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution $537.0
 $574.7
 $1,527.4
 $1,570.8
Other Revenues – Affiliated 17.1
 19.5
 48.2
 68.7
Other Revenues – Nonaffiliated 3.6
 3.4
 9.9
 13.2
TOTAL REVENUES 557.7
 597.6
 1,585.5
 1,652.7
         
EXPENSES  
    
  
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation 76.4
 91.3
 238.2
 236.8
Purchased Electricity for Resale 32.9
 43.7
 101.2
 134.3
Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates 62.4
 64.5
 166.2
 165.9
Other Operation 140.5
 138.9
 434.2
 413.9
Maintenance 51.5
 45.7
 153.6
 134.6
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 
 10.5
 
 10.5
Depreciation and Amortization 55.0
 49.1
 154.8
 143.2
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 23.9
 22.5
 68.3
 71.5
TOTAL EXPENSES 442.6
 466.2
 1,316.5
 1,310.7
         
OPERATING INCOME 115.1
 131.4
 269.0
 342.0
         
Other Income (Expense):  
    
  
Interest Income 2.4
 1.7
 11.5
 9.1
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 3.5
 4.1
 8.1
 10.9
Interest Expense (27.5) (26.7) (83.0) (76.3)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 93.5
 110.5
 205.6
 285.7
         
Income Tax Expense 28.6
 35.1
 61.8
 84.3
         
NET INCOME $64.9
 $75.4
 $143.8
 $201.4


The common stock of I&M is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
Net Income$74.8 $67.2 $177.6 $156.7 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES   
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0 and $0.1 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.2) and $0.2 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively0.1 0.4 (0.6)0.8 
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.6) and $0 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(0.3)(0.1)(2.2)(0.2)
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)(0.2)0.3 (2.8)0.6 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$74.6 $67.5 $174.8 $157.3 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
83
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income $64.9
 $75.4
 $143.8
 $201.4
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME, NET OF TAXES  
    
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0.1 and $0.1 for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $0.5 and $0.5 for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively 0.3
 0.3
 1.0
 1.0
         
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $65.2
 $75.7
 $144.8
 $202.4


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2021$56.6 $980.9 $1,748.5 $(1.3)$2,784.7 
Common Stock Dividends  (25.0) (25.0)
Net Income  89.5  89.5 
Other Comprehensive Income   0.3 0.3 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY -MARCH 31, 202256.6 980.9 1,813.0 (1.0)2,849.5 
Capital Contribution from Parent1.3 1.3 
Common Stock Dividends(25.0)(25.0)
Net Income67.2 67.2 
Other Comprehensive Income0.3 0.3 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - JUNE 30, 2022$56.6 $982.2 $1,855.2 $(0.7)$2,893.3 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2022$56.6 $988.8 $1,963.2 $(0.3)$3,008.3 
Common Stock Dividends(31.2)(31.2)
Net Income102.8 102.8 
Other Comprehensive Loss(2.6)(2.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - MARCH 31, 202356.6 988.8 2,034.8 (2.9)3,077.3 
Capital Contribution from Parent0.1 0.1 
Common Stock Dividends  (31.3) (31.3)
Net Income  74.8  74.8 
Other Comprehensive Loss   (0.2)(0.2)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY - JUNE 30, 2023$56.6 $988.9 $2,078.3 $(3.1)$3,120.7 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
84
 Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015$56.6
 $980.9
 $1,015.6
 $(16.7) $2,036.4
          
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (93.8)  
 (93.8)
Net Income 
  
 201.4
  
 201.4
Other Comprehensive Income 
  
  
 1.0
 1.0
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016$56.6
 $980.9
 $1,123.2
 $(15.7) $2,145.0
  
  
  
  
  
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016$56.6
 $980.9
 $1,130.5
 $(16.2) $2,151.8
          
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (93.7)  
 (93.7)
Net Income 
  
 143.8
  
 143.8
Other Comprehensive Income 
  
  
 1.0
 1.0
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017$56.6
 $980.9
 $1,180.6
 $(15.2) $2,202.9


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$3.8 $4.2 
Advances to Affiliates40.5 23.0 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers48.9 96.6 
Affiliated Companies113.3 104.0 
Accrued Unbilled Revenues0.8 0.6 
Miscellaneous6.6 4.7 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts(0.1)(0.1)
Total Accounts Receivable169.5 205.8 
Fuel85.6 46.5 
Materials and Supplies201.7 188.1 
Risk Management Assets21.4 15.2 
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs17.5 47.1 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets44.1 41.9 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS584.1 571.8 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Generation5,598.9 5,585.1 
Transmission1,871.5 1,842.2 
Distribution3,131.7 3,024.7 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Coal Mining and Nuclear Fuel)831.6 839.3 
Construction Work in Progress292.0 253.0 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment11,725.7 11,544.3 
Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization4,243.0 4,132.8 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET7,482.7 7,411.5 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets392.1 459.6 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts3,648.8 3,341.2 
Operating Lease Assets59.3 64.3 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets273.2 270.5 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS4,373.4 4,135.6 
TOTAL ASSETS$12,440.2 $12,118.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
85
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents $1.3
 $1.2
Advances to Affiliates 12.6
 12.5
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 42.1
 60.2
Affiliated Companies 42.8
 51.0
Accrued Unbilled Revenues 8.4
 1.5
Miscellaneous 1.1
 0.7
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (0.3) 
Total Accounts Receivable 94.1
 113.4
Fuel 32.3
 32.3
Materials and Supplies 156.5
 150.8
Risk Management Assets 11.6
 3.5
Accrued Tax Benefits 34.5
 37.7
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs 12.3
 26.1
Accrued Reimbursement of Spent Nuclear Fuel Costs 11.0
 22.1
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 26.9
 19.9
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 393.1
 419.5
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric:    
Generation 4,399.9
 4,056.1
Transmission 1,491.4
 1,472.8
Distribution 2,000.1
 1,899.3
Other Property, Plant and Equipment (Including Coal Mining and Nuclear Fuel) 555.9
 550.2
Construction Work in Progress 478.9
 654.2
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 8,926.2
 8,632.6
Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization 3,022.5
 3,005.1
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET
 5,903.7
 5,627.5
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Regulatory Assets 941.0
 916.6
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts 2,433.0
 2,256.2
Long-term Risk Management Assets 0.5
 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 95.9
 121.5
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 3,470.4
 3,294.3
     
TOTAL ASSETS $9,767.2
 $9,341.3


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Advances from Affiliates$— $249.9 
Accounts Payable:  
General220.8 173.4 
Affiliated Companies89.3 121.5 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
   (June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $72.1 and $89.6,
   Respectively, Related to DCC Fuel)
74.3 341.8 
Customer Deposits50.4 48.6 
Accrued Taxes100.2 103.2 
Accrued Interest42.1 36.9 
Obligations Under Operating Leases16.5 16.0 
Other Current Liabilities84.6 105.8 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES678.2 1,197.1 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated3,389.8 2,919.0 
Deferred Income Taxes1,182.6 1,157.0 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits1,909.5 1,702.2 
Asset Retirement Obligations2,064.9 2,027.6 
Obligations Under Operating Leases43.5 48.9 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities51.0 58.8 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES8,641.3 7,913.5 
TOTAL LIABILITIES9,319.5 9,110.6 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY  
Common Stock – No Par Value:  
Authorized – 2,500,000 Shares  
Outstanding – 1,400,000 Shares56.6 56.6 
Paid-in Capital988.9 988.8 
Retained Earnings2,078.3 1,963.2 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(3.1)(0.3)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY3,120.7 3,008.3 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY$12,440.2 $12,118.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
86
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $177.5
 $215.2
Accounts Payable:    
General 168.6
 179.0
Affiliated Companies 72.2
 75.6
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $83.7 and $130.9, Respectively, Related to DCC Fuel)
 462.1
 209.3
Risk Management Liabilities 2.0
 0.3
Customer Deposits 37.3
 34.3
Accrued Taxes 43.8
 77.2
Accrued Interest 14.3
 31.7
Obligations Under Capital Leases 7.3
 9.4
Other Current Liabilities 114.3
 123.4
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,099.4
 955.4
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 2,196.4
 2,262.1
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 0.2
 0.8
Deferred Income Taxes 1,681.8
 1,527.4
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 1,169.6
 1,065.5
Asset Retirement Obligations 1,307.4
 1,257.9
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 109.5
 120.4
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 6,464.9
 6,234.1
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 7,564.3
 7,189.5
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY    
Common Stock – No Par Value:    
Authorized – 2,500,000 Shares    
Outstanding – 1,400,000 Shares 56.6
 56.6
Paid-in Capital 980.9
 980.9
Retained Earnings 1,180.6
 1,130.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (15.2) (16.2)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 2,202.9
 2,151.8
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY $9,767.2
 $9,341.3


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$177.6 $156.7 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities: 
Depreciation and Amortization236.2 268.6 
Deferred Income Taxes(1.9)0.3 
Amortization (Deferral) of Incremental Nuclear Refueling Outage Expenses, Net36.7 (38.3)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(2.8)(5.4)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts(13.7)(11.6)
Amortization of Nuclear Fuel50.2 39.0 
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net29.6 (17.5)
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets(7.0)3.3 
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(4.6)22.2 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net37.3 24.0 
Fuel, Materials and Supplies(52.7)4.5 
Accounts Payable46.8 13.6 
Accrued Taxes, Net(3.0)(2.4)
Other Current Assets(3.6)15.2 
Other Current Liabilities(23.4)(20.1)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities501.7 452.1 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(267.1)(262.5)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net(17.5)(1.0)
Purchases of Investment Securities(1,233.3)(1,253.2)
Sales of Investment Securities1,206.3 1,229.9 
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel(73.9)(67.7)
Other Investing Activities3.3 3.0 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(382.2)(351.5)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Parent0.1 1.3 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated494.9 72.8 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net(249.9)(42.8)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated(299.2)(40.7)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(3.8)(40.1)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(62.5)(50.0)
Other Financing Activities0.5 0.4 
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities(119.9)(99.1)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(0.4)1.5 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period4.2 1.3 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$3.8 $2.8 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$62.1 $59.2 
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes13.8 (4.9)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases3.2 0.4 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,78.1 68.2 
Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,(36.0)— 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
87
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $143.8
 $201.4
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
  
Depreciation and Amortization 154.8
 143.2
Deferred Income Taxes 132.2
 116.2
Amortization (Deferral) of Incremental Nuclear Refueling Outage Expenses, Net 15.5
 (17.4)
Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges 
 10.5
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (8.1) (10.9)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts (7.5) 0.5
Amortization of Nuclear Fuel 104.8
 109.7
Pension Contribution to Qualified Plan Trust (13.0) (12.7)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net 22.0
 6.1
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (42.1) 
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 40.9
 30.0
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
  
Accounts Receivable, Net 19.3
 17.0
Fuel, Materials and Supplies (4.1) (1.1)
Accounts Payable 16.6
 (17.9)
Accrued Taxes, Net (30.2) (16.5)
Other Current Assets 8.0
 6.7
Other Current Liabilities (28.6) (27.8)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 524.3
 537.0
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
Construction Expenditures (469.2) (405.1)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net (0.1) (0.7)
Purchases of Investment Securities (1,842.2) (2,452.9)
Sales of Investment Securities 1,808.6
 2,427.0
Acquisitions of Nuclear Fuel (73.2) (127.6)
Other Investing Activities 7.3
 7.8
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (568.8) (551.5)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 411.1
 482.7
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net (37.7) (268.0)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated (227.1) (76.8)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (8.7) (29.8)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (93.7) (93.8)
Other Financing Activities 0.7
 0.7
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities 44.6
 15.0
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 0.1
 0.5
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 1.2
 1.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $1.3
 $1.6
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $92.0
 $85.6
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes (69.6) (36.0)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 5.9
 16.8
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 74.5
 83.4
Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 0.6
 0.3
Expected Reimbursement for Capital Cost of Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Cask Storage 2.8
 0.1


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.




OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES




OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days


Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential2,828 3,058 6,562 7,192 
Commercial3,950 3,850 7,950 7,701 
Industrial3,502 3,624 6,920 7,127 
Miscellaneous24 24 54 54 
Total Retail (a)10,304 10,556 21,486 22,074 
Wholesale (b)428 565 881 1,136 
Total KWhs10,732 11,121 22,367 23,210 
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential3,644
 4,380
 10,198
 11,209
Commercial3,806
 4,114
 10,789
 11,158
Industrial3,708
 3,610
 10,967
 10,671
Miscellaneous28
 27
 87
 89
Total Retail (a)11,186
 12,131
 32,041
 33,127
        
Wholesale (b)585
 654
 1,749
 1,389
        
Total KWhs11,771
 12,785
 33,790
 34,516


(a)Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.
(a)Represents energy delivered to distribution customers.
(b)Primarily Ohio’s contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold into PJM.

(b)Primarily Ohio’s contractually obligated purchases of OVEC power sold to PJM.

Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)177 206 1,521 2,070 
Normal – Heating (b)185 186 2,076 2,072 
Actual – Cooling (c)184 359 184 360 
Normal – Cooling (b)305 298 308 301 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
88


  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in degree days)
Actual - Heating (a) 
 
 1,500
 1,929
Normal - Heating (b) 6
 7
 2,091
 2,110
         
Actual - Cooling (c) 642
 900
 957
 1,209
Normal - Cooling (b) 670
 664
 960
 956
Ohio Power Company and Subsidiaries
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$74.8 $158.0 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins13.7 34.2 
Margins from Off-system Sales17.3 41.4 
Transmission Revenues2.0 1.1 
Other Revenues(3.3)(2.4)
Total Change in Gross Margin29.7 74.3 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance(44.8)(84.9)
Depreciation and Amortization3.1 2.8 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes6.8 (1.5)
Other Income(0.4)(0.5)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(0.5)(0.7)
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost1.0 2.0 
Interest Expense(2.1)(4.0)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(36.9)(86.8)
  
Income Tax Expense0.9 1.0 
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries(0.8)(0.8)
  
2023 Net Income$67.7 $145.7 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.



ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $99.9
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (74.1)
Off-system Sales (12.0)
Transmission Revenues (1.8)
Other Revenues (2.1)
Total Change in Gross Margin (90.0)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 59.3
Depreciation and Amortization 12.1
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 1.5
Carrying Costs Income (0.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.6
Interest Expense 1.5
Total Change in Expenses and Other 74.6
   
Income Tax Expense (1.9)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $82.6


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $74 increased $14 million primarily due to the following:
A $52$19 million decreasenet increase in Basic Transmission Cost Rider revenues associated with the Universal Service Fund (USF) surcharge rate decrease.and recoverable PJM expenses. This decreaseincrease was partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
An $18A $14 million net decreaseincrease due to various rider revenues. This increase was partially offset in recovery of equity carrying charges related to the Phase-In Recovery Rider (PIRR), net of associated amortizations.Margins from Off-system Sales and other expense items below.
An $8These increases were partially offset by:
A $13 million decrease in revenues associated with smart grid riders.weather-related usage due to a 49% decrease in cooling degree days.
A $7 million decrease in weather-normalized margins primarily in the residential and commercial classes.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $17 million primarily due to the following:
A $51 million increase in deferrals of OVEC costs. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $33 million decrease in off-system sales at OVEC due to lower market prices and volume. This decrease was offset in various expenses below.
A $5 million decrease in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Taxes Other Than Income Taxes below.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $12 million favorable impact due to the recovery of losses from a power contract with OVEC. The PUCO approved a PPA rider beginning in January 2017 to recover any net expense related to the deferral of OVEC losses starting in June 2016. This increase was offset by a corresponding decrease in Margins from Off-System Sales below.
Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $12 million due to current year losses from a power contract with OVEC which was offset in Retail Margins above as a result of the OVEC PPA rider beginning in January 2017.above.
89





Expenses and Other changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $59increased $45 million primarily due to the following:
A $52$19 million decrease in remitted USF surcharge paymentsincrease related to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This decreaseincrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.
An $18 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to:
A $15 million increase in transmission formula rate true-up activity.
A $12 million increase in recoverable PJM expense. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $6 million decrease in vegetation management expenses.
A $6 million increase in distribution expenses primarily related to vegetation management. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $5 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $3 million primarily due to the following:
A $13 million decrease in recoverable smart gridDistribution Investment Rider depreciable expenses. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
Depreciation and Amortization expensesdecreased $12 million primarily due to the following:
A $5 million decrease in recoverable DIR depreciation expense in Ohio.
A $4 million decrease in amortization expenses for the collection of carrying costs on deferred capacity charges beginning June 2015.
A $4 million decrease in recoverable smart grid depreciation expenses. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $2 million primarily due to the following:
A $5 million decrease in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $3An $8 million increase in property taxes due to additional investments in transmission and distribution assets anda higher depreciable base.
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes decreased $7 million due to favorable property tax rates.true-up activity.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $244.7
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (153.8)
Off-system Sales (27.9)
Transmission Revenues (2.9)
Other Revenues (0.3)
Total Change in Gross Margin (184.9)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 144.3
Depreciation and Amortization 23.3
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (2.1)
Interest Income 1.0
Carrying Costs Income (1.0)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.4
Interest Expense 10.9
Total Change in Expenses and Other 176.8
   
Income Tax Expense (5.5)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $231.1


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of purchased electricity and amortization of generation deferrals were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $154 increased $34 million primarily due to the following:
A $140$43 million decreaseincrease due to various rider revenues. This increase was partially offset in Margins from Off-system Sales and other expense items below.
A $34 million net increase in Basic Transmission Cost Rider revenues associated with the USF surcharge rate decrease.and recoverable PJM expenses. This decreaseincrease was partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $21$38 million decrease in weather-related usage due to a prior year reversal27% decrease in heating degree days and a 49% decrease in cooling degree days.
Margins from Off-system Sales increased $41 million due to the following:
An $84 million increase in deferrals of a regulatory provision resulting from a favorable court decision.OVEC costs. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $13$43 million decrease in revenues associated with smart grid riders.off-system sales at OVEC due to lower market prices and volume. This decrease was offset in variousRetail Margins above.

Expenses and Other changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
A $9 million net decrease in recovery of equity carrying charges related to the PIRR, net of associated amortizations.
A $7 million decrease in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Taxes Other Than Income Taxes below.
A $3 million decrease in transmission cost recovery rider revenues. This decrease was offset in Depreciation and Amortization below.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $46 million favorable impact due to the recovery of losses from a power contract with OVEC. The PUCO approved a PPA rider beginning in January 2017 to recover any net expense related to the deferral of OVEC losses starting in June 2016. This increase was offset by a corresponding decrease in Margins from Off-System Sales below.
A $6 million increase in rider revenues associated with the DIR. This increase was partially offset in various expenses below.
Margins from Off-system Sales decreased $28increased $85 million primarily due to the following:
A $46 million decrease due to current year losses from a power contract with OVEC which was offset in Retail Margins above as a result of the OVEC PPA rider beginning in January 2017.


This decrease was partially offset by:
An $18$48 million increase primarily duerelated to the impact of prior year losses from a power contract with OVEC which was not included in the OVEC PPA rider.

Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $144 million primarily due to the following:
A $140 million decrease in remitted USF surcharge payments to the Ohio Department of Development to fund an energy assistance program for qualified Ohio customers. This decreaseincrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.
A $23 million increase in transmission expenses primarily due to:
A $17 million increase in recoverable PJM expenses. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
A $16 million increase in transmission formula rate true-up activity.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $7 million decrease in vegetation management expenses.
90


An $8 million increase in distribution expenses related to vegetation management. This increase was offset in Retail Margins above.
These increases were partially offset by:
A $9 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $3 million primarily due to the following:
A $21 million decrease in recoverable smart gridDistribution Investment Rider depreciable expenses. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
A $7 million decrease in securitized customer accounts receivable expenses.
A $3 million decrease in employee-related expenses.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $12 million increase in PJM expenses related to the annual formula rate true-up that will be recovered in future periods.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $23 million primarily due to the following:
An $11 million decrease in amortization expenses for the collection of carrying costs on deferred capacity charges beginning June 2015.
An $8 million decrease in recoveries of transmission cost rider carrying costs. This decrease was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
A $7 million decrease in recoverable DIR depreciation expense in Ohio.
A $5 million decrease in recoverable smart grid depreciation expenses. This decrease was offset in Retail Margins above.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $5 million increase in depreciation expense due to an increase in depreciable base of transmission and distribution assets.
A $3$13 million increase due to amortization of capitalized software costs.a higher depreciable base.


Taxes Other Than Income Taxes increased $2 million primarily due to the following:
91
A $9 million increase in property taxes due to additional investments in transmission and distribution assets and higher tax rates.
This increase was partially offset by:
A $7 million decrease in state excise taxes due to a decrease in metered KWh. This decrease was offset by a corresponding decrease in Retail Margins above.

InterestExpense decreased $11 million primarily due to the maturity of a senior unsecured note in June 2016.
Income Tax Expense increased $6 million primarily due to other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis and the recording of federal income tax adjustments, partially offset by a decrease in pretax book income.




OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
REVENUES    
Electricity, Transmission and Distribution$868.8 $817.2 $1,890.6 $1,641.4 
Sales to AEP Affiliates8.2 3.9 15.8 7.6 
Other Revenues2.1 1.8 7.3 3.9 
TOTAL REVENUES879.1 822.9 1,913.7 1,652.9 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity for Resale267.6 249.2 660.2 475.5 
Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates11.6 3.5 11.6 9.8 
Other Operation265.4 223.3 539.2 460.9 
Maintenance51.2 48.5 95.5 88.9 
Depreciation and Amortization68.2 71.3 143.4 146.2 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes114.2 121.0 249.5 248.0 
TOTAL EXPENSES778.2 716.8 1,699.4 1,429.3 
OPERATING INCOME100.9 106.1 214.3 223.6 
Other Income (Expense):    
Other Income0.2 0.6 0.3 0.8 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction2.9 3.4 5.7 6.4 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost6.5 5.5 13.0 11.0 
Interest Expense(31.9)(29.8)(63.0)(59.0)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY EARNINGS78.6 85.8 170.3 182.8 
Income Tax Expense10.9 11.8 24.6 25.6 
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries— 0.8 — 0.8 
NET INCOME$67.7 $74.8 $145.7 $158.0 
The common stock of OPCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
92
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Electricity, Transmission and Distribution $736.0
 $864.4
 $2,127.8
 $2,349.2
Sales to AEP Affiliates 4.6
 5.5
 19.4
 11.7
Other Revenues 1.4
 1.4
 4.8
 4.8
TOTAL REVENUES 742.0
 871.3
 2,152.0
 2,365.7
         
EXPENSES  
  
  
  
Purchased Electricity for Resale 180.7
 203.4
 525.4
 516.1
Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates 26.7
 35.9
 83.4
 121.4
Amortization of Generation Deferrals 58.7
 66.1
 172.9
 173.0
Other Operation 125.8
 184.2
 377.6
 525.9
Maintenance 37.9
 38.8
 108.4
 104.4
Depreciation and Amortization 57.3
 69.4
 165.7
 189.0
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 100.4
 101.9
 293.8
 291.7
TOTAL EXPENSES 587.5
 699.7
 1,727.2
 1,921.5
         
OPERATING INCOME 154.5
 171.6
 424.8
 444.2
         
Other Income (Expense):  
  
  
  
Interest Income 0.7
 0.7
 4.0
 3.0
Carrying Costs Income 0.5
 0.9
 3.0
 4.0
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.9
 0.3
 4.1
 3.7
Interest Expense (25.7) (27.2) (76.8) (87.7)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 130.9
 146.3
 359.1
 367.2
         
Income Tax Expense 48.3
 46.4
 128.0
 122.5
         
NET INCOME $82.6
 $99.9
 $231.1
 $244.7


The common stock of OPCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income $82.6
 $99.9
 $231.1
 $244.7
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES  
  
  
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(0.4) and $(0.5) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively (0.3) (0.2) (0.8) (1.0)
         
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $82.3
 $99.7
 $230.3
 $243.7
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021$321.2 $838.8 $1,686.3 $2,846.3 
Common Stock Dividends(15.0)(15.0)
Net Income83.2 83.2 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2022321.2 838.8 1,754.5 2,914.5 
Capital Contribution from Parent0.7 0.7 
Common Stock Dividends  (15.0)(15.0)
Net Income  74.8 74.8 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022$321.2 $839.5 $1,814.3 $2,975.0 
    
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022$321.2 $837.8 $1,929.1 $3,088.1 
Capital Contribution from Parent50.050.0
Net Income78.0 78.0 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2023321.2 887.8 2,007.1 3,216.1 
Capital Contribution from Parent125.0 125.0 
Net Income  67.7 67.7 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023$321.2 $1,012.8 $2,074.8 $3,408.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
93
 Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015$321.2
 $838.8
 $822.3
 $4.3
 $1,986.6
          
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (150.0)  
 (150.0)
Net Income 
  
 244.7
  
 244.7
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
 (1.0) (1.0)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016$321.2
 $838.8
 $917.0
 $3.3
 $2,080.3
  
  
  
  
  
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016$321.2
 $838.8
 $954.5
 $3.0
 $2,117.5
          
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (130.0)  
 (130.0)
Net Income 
  
 231.1
  
 231.1
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
 (0.8) (0.8)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017$321.2
 $838.8
 $1,055.6
 $2.2
 $2,217.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$9.7 $9.6 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers106.0 119.9 
Affiliated Companies126.5 100.9 
Accrued Unbilled Revenues— 17.8 
Miscellaneous0.4 0.1 
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts— (0.1)
Total Accounts Receivable232.9 238.6 
Materials and Supplies139.3 109.5 
Renewable Energy Credits28.9 35.0 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets15.8 21.7 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS426.6 414.4 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Transmission3,274.0 3,198.6 
Distribution6,633.3 6,450.3 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment1,071.3 1,051.4 
Construction Work in Progress651.3 474.3 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment11,629.9 11,174.6 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization2,627.0 2,565.3 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET9,002.9 8,609.3 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets406.9 327.3 
Operating Lease Assets71.0 73.8 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets363.3 578.3 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS841.2 979.4 
TOTAL ASSETS$10,270.7 $10,003.1 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
94
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents $3.1
 $3.1
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding 15.6
 27.2
Advances to Affiliates 
 24.2
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 27.1
 51.1
Affiliated Companies 72.0
 66.3
Accrued Unbilled Revenues 24.2
 21.0
Miscellaneous 1.1
 0.9
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (0.4) (0.4)
Total Accounts Receivable 124.0
 138.9
Materials and Supplies 42.8
 45.9
Emission Allowances 23.6
 20.4
Risk Management Assets 0.2
 0.2
Accrued Tax Benefits 15.4
 0.1
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 28.1
 10.9
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 252.8
 270.9
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric:    
Transmission 2,349.5
 2,319.2
Distribution 4,575.0
 4,457.2
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 487.9
 443.7
Construction Work in Progress 350.7
 221.5
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 7,763.1
 7,441.6
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 2,182.8
 2,116.0
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET
 5,580.3
 5,325.6
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Notes Receivable – Affiliated 32.3
 32.3
Regulatory Assets 1,014.7
 1,107.5
Securitized Assets 43.7
 62.1
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 131.2
 295.5
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 1,221.9
 1,497.4
     
TOTAL ASSETS $7,055.0
 $7,093.9


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016
(dollars in millions)2022
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
(in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Advances from Affiliates$72.3 $172.9 
Accounts Payable:  
General322.6 337.3 
Affiliated Companies153.5 126.1 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated— 0.1 
Risk Management Liabilities6.3 1.8 
Customer Deposits59.5 96.5 
Accrued Taxes441.8 733.1 
Obligations Under Operating Leases13.5 13.5 
Other Current Liabilities158.5 154.2 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES1,228.0 1,635.5 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated3,365.6 2,970.2 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities47.7 37.9 
Deferred Income Taxes1,123.4 1,101.1 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits992.6 1,044.0 
Obligations Under Operating Leases57.8 60.3 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities46.8 66.0 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES5,633.9 5,279.5 
TOTAL LIABILITIES6,861.9 6,915.0 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY  
Common Stock –No Par Value:  
Authorized – 40,000,000 Shares  
Outstanding – 27,952,473 Shares321.2 321.2 
Paid-in Capital1,012.8 837.8 
Retained Earnings2,074.8 1,929.1 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY3,408.8 3,088.1 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY$10,270.7 $10,003.1 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
95
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $167.6
 $
Accounts Payable:  
  
General 157.8
 175.4
Affiliated Companies 95.3
 95.6
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $47 and $46.3, Respectively, Related to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding)
 397.0
 46.4
Risk Management Liabilities 7.6
 5.9
Customer Deposits 62.9
 71.0
Accrued Taxes 251.3
 520.3
Accrued Interest 38.3
 31.2
Other Current Liabilities 166.3
 236.0
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,344.1
 1,181.8
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $47.5 and $93.9, Respectively, Related to Ohio Phase-in-Recovery Funding)
 1,321.9
 1,717.5
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 130.9
 113.1
Deferred Income Taxes 1,460.7
 1,346.1
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 519.3
 506.2
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations 19.3
 27.8
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 41.0
 83.9
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 3,493.1
 3,794.6
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,837.2
 4,976.4
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY    
Common Stock – No Par Value:    
Authorized – 40,000,000 Shares  
  
Outstanding – 27,952,473 Shares 321.2
 321.2
Paid-in Capital 838.8
 838.8
Retained Earnings 1,055.6
 954.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 2.2
 3.0
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 2,217.8
 2,117.5
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY $7,055.0
 $7,093.9


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


OHIO POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$145.7 $158.0 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Depreciation and Amortization143.4 146.2 
Deferred Income Taxes7.1 13.8 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(5.7)(6.4)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts14.3 (44.3)
Property Taxes193.9 178.6 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets(88.0)(53.1)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(37.7)44.3 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net8.2 (35.8)
Materials and Supplies(2.5)(10.1)
Accounts Payable30.8 78.2 
Customer Deposits(37.0)142.5 
Accrued Taxes, Net(289.9)(246.8)
Other Current Assets2.3 12.2 
Other Current Liabilities(15.3)35.6 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities69.6 412.9 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(547.7)(376.4)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net— (14.0)
Other Investing Activities11.1 12.6 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(536.6)(377.8)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Parent175.0 0.7 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated395.1 — 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net(100.6)— 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated(0.6)(0.1)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(2.4)(2.4)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock— (30.0)
Other Financing Activities0.6 0.6 
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities467.1 (31.2)
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents0.1 3.9 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period9.6 3.0 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$9.7 $6.9 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$57.6 $56.8 
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes9.2 21.4 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases2.1 1.2 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,87.4 92.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
96
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $231.1
 $244.7
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
  
Depreciation and Amortization 165.7
 189.0
Amortization of Generation Deferrals 172.9
 173.0
Deferred Income Taxes 117.5
 28.6
Carrying Costs Income (3.0) (4.0)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (4.1) (3.7)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts 19.5
 124.7
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust (8.2) (7.1)
Property Taxes 175.9
 169.1
Provision for Refund – Global Settlement, Net (93.3) 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (126.7) (124.9)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities 43.4
 17.2
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
  
Accounts Receivable, Net 14.9
 8.8
Materials and Supplies (7.1) 0.5
Accounts Payable (31.2) 2.0
Accrued Taxes, Net (284.3) (291.1)
Other Current Assets (17.3) (5.7)
Other Current Liabilities (34.8) (46.8)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 330.9
 474.3
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
Construction Expenditures (362.5) (276.4)
Change in Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding 11.6
 11.6
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net 24.2
 330.9
Other Investing Activities 6.9
 9.0
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Investing Activities (319.8) 75.1
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net 167.6
 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated (46.4) (395.9)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (3.1) (3.1)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (130.0) (150.0)
Other Financing Activities 0.8
 0.5
Net Cash Flows Used for Financing Activities (11.1) (548.5)
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 
 0.9
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 3.1
 3.1
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $3.1
 $4.0
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $68.1
 $78.2
Net Cash Paid for Income Taxes 69.6
 178.0
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 3.6
 2.4
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 56.8
 30.0


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.




PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA



PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days


Summary of KWh Energy Sales
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential1,358 1,469 2,746 3,027 
Commercial1,291 1,309 2,395 2,429 
Industrial1,507 1,565 2,946 2,951 
Miscellaneous317 333 592 616 
Total Retail4,473 4,676 8,679 9,023 
Wholesale46 262 73 605 
Total KWhs4,519 4,938 8,752 9,628 
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential1,992
 2,184
 4,662
 4,925
Commercial1,488
 1,529
 3,926
 4,001
Industrial1,472
 1,494
 4,249
 4,162
Miscellaneous353
 369
 942
 955
Total Retail5,305
 5,576
 13,779
 14,043
        
Wholesale82
 113
 309
 226
        
Total KWhs5,387
 5,689
 14,088
 14,269


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)28 19 899 1,153 
Normal – Heating (b)45 45 1,100 1,085 
Actual – Cooling (c)638 786 648 797 
Normal – Cooling (b)660 650 677 667 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.
97


 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Actual - Heating (a)
 
 682
 782
Normal - Heating (b)1
 1
 1,104
 1,105
        
Actual - Cooling (c)1,313
 1,535
 2,001
 2,247
Normal - Cooling (b)1,395
 1,390
 2,064
 2,055
Public Service Company of Oklahoma
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023 Net Income
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Net Income$43.0 $48.8 
Changes in Gross Margin:
Retail Margins (a)0.8 16.1 
Transmission Revenues0.3 1.9 
Other Revenues(0.5)0.6 
Total Change in Gross Margin0.6 18.6 
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance11.2 4.5 
Depreciation and Amortization(4.4)(12.8)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes(1.2)(4.3)
Interest Income(2.4)(3.1)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction1.2 1.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost0.3 0.8 
Interest Expense(5.5)(11.8)
Total Change in Expenses and Other(0.8)(25.1)
  
Income Tax Benefit8.2 6.4 
  
2023 Net Income$51.0 $48.7 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.



(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.
Third
Second Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $52.8
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (15.6)
Off-system Sales (0.7)
Transmission Revenues 4.1
Other Revenues (2.0)
Total Change in Gross Margin (14.2)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (2.2)
Depreciation and Amortization 5.5
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (0.7)
Interest Income (0.2)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.1)
Interest Expense 1.7
Total Change in Expenses and Other 3.0
   
Income Tax Expense 4.6
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $46.2

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $16 increased $1 million primarily due to the following:
A $17$9 million decrease primarilyincrease in base rate and rider revenues. This increase was partially offset in other expense items below.
A $4 million increase in fuel revenue due to higher rates implementedincreased carrying charges on fuel under-recovered balances.
A $3 million increase in 2016 associated with interim rates.weather-normalized margins primarily in the residential and commercial classes.
These increases were partially offset by:
An $11$8 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 14%19% decrease in cooling degree days.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $14$7 million increase due to weather-normalized margins.
Transmission Revenues increased $4 milliondecrease in deferred fuel primarily due to an accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgradesincrease in third quarter 2016.PTCs. This decrease was offset in Income Tax Benefit below.


98


Expenses and Other and Income Tax ExpenseBenefit changed between years as follows:


DepreciationOther Operation and AmortizationMaintenance expenses decreased $6$11 million primarily due to the following:
A $9$5 million decrease primarily relateddue to prior year higher estimated depreciation expense associated with interim rates.the capitalization of previously expensed renewable generation pre-construction charges.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $4 million increase primarily related to new depreciation rates implementeddecrease in 2017 and a higher depreciable base.
Income Tax Expense decreased $5 milliontransmission expenses primarily due to a decrease in pretax book income.
recoverable SPP transmission expense. The recoverable SPP transmission expense was offset in Retail Margins above.

Interest Expense increased $6 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and higher interest rates.

Income Tax Benefit increased $8 million primarily due to an increase in PTCs. The increase in PTCs was partially offset in Retail Margins above.

Nine
Six Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Net Income
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $97.4
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (17.6)
Off-system Sales (0.9)
Transmission Revenues 4.8
Other Revenues (4.6)
Total Change in Gross Margin (18.3)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance (31.1)
Depreciation and Amortization 12.1
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (2.2)
Interest Income (0.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (4.5)
Interest Expense 4.4
Total Change in Expenses and Other (21.7)
   
Income Tax Expense 14.0
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $71.4

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $18 increased $16 million primarily due to the following:
An $18 million increase in base rate and rider revenues. This increase was partially offset in other expense items below.
An $8 million increase in fuel revenue due to increased carrying charges on fuel under-recovered balances.
A $15$5 million increase in weather-normalized margins primarily in the residential and commercial classes.
These increases were partially offset by:
An $11 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to an 11%a 19% decrease in cooling degree days and a 13%22% decrease in heating degree days.
A $14$4 million decrease primarily due to higher rates implemented in 2016 associated with interim rates.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $9 million increase primarily due to higher weather-normalized margins.
A $5 million increase related to new base rates implemented in January 2017.
Transmission Revenues increased $5 milliondeferred fuel primarily due to an accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgradesincrease in third quarter 2016PTCs. This decrease was offset in Income Tax Benefit below.

Expenses and additional transmission investments in SPP.
Other and Income Tax Benefit changed between years as follows:

Other RevenuesOperation and Maintenance expenses decreased $5 million primarily due to the elimination of connection charges for certain customers with advanced metering, effective with the implementation of new base rates in January 2017.
following:


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses increased $31A $5 million primarilydecrease due to the following:
capitalization of previously expensed renewable generation pre-construction charges.
A $16$5 million increasedecrease in vegetation management expenses.  This increase istransmission expenses due to a $15 million decrease in recoverable SPP transmission expense partially offset by a corresponding$10 million increase due to a change in rider recovery. The recoverable SPP transmission expense was offset in Retail Margins as vegetation management expenses recovered in the prior year under the System Reliability Rider are now recovered as a component of base rates in the current year.above.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $15$3 million increase in transmissiongeneration maintenance expenses primarily due to increased SPP transmission services.at various plants.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses decreased $12 million primarily due the following:
A $24 million decrease primarily related to prior year higher estimated depreciation expense associated with interim rates.
This decrease was partially offset by:
A $12 million increase primarily related to new depreciation rates implemented in 2017 and a higher depreciable base.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $5 million primarily due to the completion of environmental projects.
Interest Expense decreased $4 million primarily due to the deferral of the debt component of carrying charges on environmental control costs for projects at Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 and the Comanche Plant.
Income Tax Expense decreased $14increased $13 million primarily due to a decreasehigher depreciable base, implementation of new rates and the timing of refunds to customers under rate rider mechanisms.
Interest Expense increased $12 million primarily due to higher long-term debt balances and higher interest rates.
Income Tax Benefit increased $6 million primarily due to an increase in pretax book income.PTCs. The increase in PTCs was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
99






PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
REVENUES    
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution$472.4 $440.0 $887.2 $826.4 
Sales to AEP Affiliates0.1 0.8 0.8 1.4 
Other Revenues2.2 2.1 3.7 2.7 
TOTAL REVENUES474.7 442.9 891.7 830.5 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation223.1 191.9 423.2 380.6 
Other Operation87.5 95.9 179.6 184.7 
Maintenance28.5 31.3 57.3 56.7 
Depreciation and Amortization64.9 60.5 126.0 113.2 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes15.0 13.8 32.3 28.0 
TOTAL EXPENSES419.0 393.4 818.4 763.2 
OPERATING INCOME55.7 49.5 73.3 67.3 
Other Income (Expense):    
Interest Income0.1 2.5 1.1 4.2 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction1.4 0.2 2.9 1.3 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost3.5 3.2 7.1 6.3 
Interest Expense(26.8)(21.3)(52.0)(40.2)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT33.9 34.1 32.4 38.9 
Income Tax Benefit(17.1)(8.9)(16.3)(9.9)
NET INCOME$51.0 $43.0 $48.7 $48.8 
The common stock of PSO is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
100
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution $440.6
 $400.9
 $1,085.1
 $971.3
Sales to AEP Affiliates 1.1
 0.1
 3.2
 2.0
Other Revenues 1.1
 0.7
 3.3
 2.9
TOTAL REVENUES 442.8
 401.7
 1,091.6
 976.2
         
EXPENSES  
  
  
  
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation 77.9
 16.4
 115.8
 43.0
Purchased Electricity for Resale 127.8
 130.8
 379.8
 315.3
Purchased Electricity from AEP Affiliates 
 3.2
 
 3.6
Other Operation 83.6
 81.0
 226.3
 211.8
Maintenance 25.2
 25.6
 88.2
 71.6
Depreciation and Amortization 31.7
 37.2
 97.8
 109.9
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 9.8
 9.1
 30.0
 27.8
TOTAL EXPENSES 356.0
 303.3
 937.9
 783.0
         
OPERATING INCOME 86.8
 98.4
 153.7
 193.2
         
Other Income (Expense):  
  
  
  
Interest Income 
 0.2
 0.1
 0.5
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 
 1.1
 0.4
 4.9
Interest Expense (13.2) (14.9) (40.2) (44.6)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 73.6
 84.8
 114.0
 154.0
         
Income Tax Expense 27.4
 32.0
 42.6
 56.6
         
NET INCOME $46.2
 $52.8
 $71.4
 $97.4


The common stock of PSO is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2023202220232022
Net Income$51.0 $43.0 $48.7 $48.8 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES    
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.4) and $0 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively— — (1.5)— 
    
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME$51.0 $43.0 $47.2 $48.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
101
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income $46.2
 $52.8
 $71.4
 $97.4
         
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS, NET OF TAXES  
    
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(0.3) and $(0.3) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively (0.2) (0.2) (0.6) (0.6)
   
    
  
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME $46.0
 $52.6

$70.8
 $96.8


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021$157.2 $1,039.0 $1,095.4 $— $2,291.6 
Net Income5.8 5.8 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2022157.2 1,039.0 1,101.2 — 2,297.4 
Capital Contribution from Parent2.22.2 
Net Income  43.0  43.0 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022$157.2 $1,041.2 $1,144.2 $— $2,342.6 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022$157.2 $1,042.6 $1,218.0 $1.3 $2,419.1 
Common Stock Dividends(17.5)(17.5)
Net Loss(2.3)(2.3)
Other Comprehensive Loss(1.5)(1.5)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – MARCH 31, 2023157.2 1,042.6 1,198.2 (0.2)2,397.8 
Return of Capital to Parent(2.5)(2.5)
Net Income  51.0  51.0 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023$157.2 $1,040.1 $1,249.2 $(0.2)$2,446.3 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.

102
 Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 Total
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015$157.2
 $364.0
 $594.5
 $4.2
 $1,119.9
          
Net Income 
  
 97.4
  
 97.4
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
 (0.6) (0.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016$157.2
 $364.0
 $691.9
 $3.6
 $1,216.7
  
  
  
  
  
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016$157.2
 $364.0
 $689.5
 $3.4
 $1,214.1
          
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (52.5)  
 (52.5)
Net Income 
  
 71.4
  
 71.4
Other Comprehensive Loss 
  
  
 (0.6) (0.6)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017$157.2
 $364.0
 $708.4
 $2.8
 $1,232.4


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents$4.6 $4.0 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers80.5 70.1 
Affiliated Companies67.1 52.2 
Miscellaneous0.5 0.8 
Total Accounts Receivable148.1 123.1 
Fuel20.6 11.6 
Materials and Supplies105.8 111.1 
Risk Management Assets44.8 25.3 
Accrued Tax Benefits39.0 16.1 
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs178.7 178.7 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets22.8 21.6 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS564.4 491.5 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Generation2,675.7 2,394.8 
Transmission1,182.7 1,164.4 
Distribution3,309.0 3,216.4 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment492.7 469.3 
Construction Work in Progress295.2 219.3 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment7,955.3 7,464.2 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization2,011.0 1,837.7 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET5,944.3 5,626.5 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets570.0 653.7 
Employee Benefits and Pension Assets70.0 67.3 
Operating Lease Assets114.9 106.1 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets50.4 20.8 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS805.3 847.9 
TOTAL ASSETS$7,314.0 $6,965.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
103
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents $2.1
 $1.5
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 17.8
 27.5
Affiliated Companies 31.8
 26.8
Miscellaneous 3.2
 4.4
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (0.1) (0.2)
Total Accounts Receivable 52.7
 58.5
Fuel 11.9
 22.9
Materials and Supplies 42.1
 44.6
Risk Management Assets 4.7
 0.8
Accrued Tax Benefits 27.0
 27.3
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs 36.9
 33.8
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 14.4
 6.0
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 191.8
 195.4
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric:    
Generation 1,573.8
 1,559.3
Transmission 852.5
 832.8
Distribution 2,414.1
 2,322.4
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 286.3
 233.2
Construction Work in Progress 114.0
 148.2
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 5,240.7
 5,095.9
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 1,382.8
 1,272.7
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET
 3,857.9
 3,823.2
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Regulatory Assets 393.6
 340.2
Employee Benefits and Pension Assets 16.0
 10.4
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 19.2
 10.0
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 428.8
 360.6
     
TOTAL ASSETS $4,478.5
 $4,379.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
 (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Advances from Affiliates$68.1 $364.2 
Accounts Payable:  
General284.2 202.9 
Affiliated Companies85.4 76.7 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated0.6 0.5 
Customer Deposits60.0 59.0 
Accrued Taxes60.5 28.7 
Obligations Under Operating Leases9.5 8.9 
Other Current Liabilities95.5 101.8 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES663.8 842.7 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated2,383.3 1,912.3 
Deferred Income Taxes815.7 788.6 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits797.1 809.1 
Asset Retirement Obligations81.4 73.5 
Obligations Under Operating Leases108.4 99.3 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities18.0 21.3 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES4,203.9 3,704.1 
TOTAL LIABILITIES4,867.7 4,546.8 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY  
Common Stock – Par Value – $15 Per Share:  
Authorized – 11,000,000 Shares  
Issued – 10,482,000 Shares  
Outstanding – 9,013,000 Shares157.2 157.2 
Paid-in Capital1,040.1 1,042.6 
Retained Earnings1,249.2 1,218.0 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(0.2)1.3 
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY2,446.3 2,419.1 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY$7,314.0 $6,965.9 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
104
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $118.0
 $52.0
Accounts Payable:  
  
General 93.8
 116.3
Affiliated Companies 43.0
 56.2
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated 0.5
 0.5
Customer Deposits 53.1
 49.7
Accrued Taxes 40.8
 21.0
Accrued Interest 19.5
 13.9
Provision for Refund 4.1
 46.1
Other Current Liabilities 38.5
 47.8
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 411.3
 403.5
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 1,285.9
 1,285.5
Deferred Income Taxes 1,152.5
 1,058.8
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 320.9
 339.7
Asset Retirement Obligations 54.5
 52.8
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 21.0
 24.8
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 2,834.8
 2,761.6
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 3,246.1
 3,165.1
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY    
Common Stock – Par Value – $15 Per Share:    
Authorized – 11,000,000 Shares  
  
Issued – 10,482,000 Shares  
  
Outstanding – 9,013,000 Shares 157.2
 157.2
Paid-in Capital 364.0
 364.0
Retained Earnings 708.4
 689.5
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 2.8
 3.4
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 1,232.4
 1,214.1
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY $4,478.5
 $4,379.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$48.7 $48.8 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Depreciation and Amortization126.0 113.2 
Deferred Income Taxes13.1 (20.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(2.9)(1.3)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts(19.3)(56.2)
Property Taxes(27.9)(24.4)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net146.3 (124.2)
Change in Other Regulatory Assets(57.3)4.8 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets(22.7)(12.2)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(0.6)10.4 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net(25.0)(30.6)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies(2.6)(10.8)
Accounts Payable75.2 123.7 
Accrued Taxes, Net8.9 23.9 
Other Current Assets5.3 (16.8)
Other Current Liabilities(8.4)9.9 
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities256.8 37.8 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(263.6)(200.2)
Acquisitions of Renewable Energy Facilities(145.7)(549.3)
Other Investing Activities1.1 2.3 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(408.2)(747.2)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Parent— 2.2 
Return of Capital to Parent(2.5)— 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated469.8 500.0 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net(296.1)211.1 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated(0.3)(0.3)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(1.7)(1.6)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(17.5)— 
Other Financing Activities0.3 0.3 
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities152.0 711.7 
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents0.6 2.3 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period4.0 1.3 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$4.6 $3.6 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$37.6 $38.1 
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes(6.1)12.2 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases1.2 1.1 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,83.6 41.6 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.

105
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $71.4
 $97.4
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
  
Depreciation and Amortization 97.8
 109.9
Deferred Income Taxes 93.7
 79.5
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (0.4) (4.9)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts (3.9) (0.7)
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust (5.3) (5.6)
Property Taxes (9.4) (8.0)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net (5.6) (80.2)
Provision for Refund, Net (39.4) 13.8
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (19.8) (18.8)
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities (1.4) (3.7)
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
  
Accounts Receivable, Net 5.8
 4.4
Fuel, Materials and Supplies 13.5
 (2.4)
Accounts Payable (18.5) 23.1
Accrued Taxes, Net 20.1
 45.4
Other Current Assets (8.2) (2.2)
Other Current Liabilities 1.5
 (14.9)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 191.9
 232.1
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
  
Construction Expenditures (203.1) (266.8)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net 
 29.5
Other Investing Activities 1.5
 8.7
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (201.6) (228.6)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
  
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 
 150.0
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net 66.0
 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated (0.3) (150.3)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (3.2) (3.0)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (52.5) 
Other Financing Activities 0.3
 0.4
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities 10.3
 (2.9)
     
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 0.6
 0.6
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 1.5
 1.4
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $2.1
 $2.0
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $40.9
 $45.0
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes (46.6) (50.3)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 1.0
 2.2
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 15.1
 20.2


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.




SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED




SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
MANAGEMENT’S NARRATIVE DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


KWh Sales/Degree Days


Summary of KWh Energy Sales
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail:    
Residential1,371 1,502 2,722 3,138 
Commercial1,412 1,488 2,580 2,754 
Industrial1,360 1,394 2,563 2,509 
Miscellaneous19 20 36 38 
Total Retail4,162 4,404 7,901 8,439 
Wholesale1,288 1,809 2,558 3,568 
Total KWhs5,450 6,213 10,459 12,007 
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions of KWhs)
Retail: 
  
  
  
Residential1,887
 2,105
 4,547
 4,879
Commercial1,677
 1,793
 4,466
 4,652
Industrial1,339
 1,254
 3,895
 3,830
Miscellaneous19
 20
 60
 61
Total Retail4,922
 5,172
 12,968
 13,422
        
Wholesale2,105
 2,326
 6,286
 6,056
        
Total KWhs7,027
 7,498
 19,254
 19,478


Heating degree days and cooling degree days are metrics commonly used in the utility industry as a measure of the impact of weather on revenues.


Summary of Heating and Cooling Degree Days
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in degree days)
Actual – Heating (a)12 10 413 704 
Normal – Heating (b)25 26 730 726 
Actual – Cooling (c)851 985 958 1,015 
Normal – Cooling (b)748 735 788 775 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.


106


 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in degree days)
Actual - Heating (a)
 
 394
 586
Normal - Heating (b)1
 1
 747
 747
        
Actual - Cooling (c)1,248
 1,502
 1,999
 2,277
Normal - Cooling (b)1,414
 1,410
 2,185
 2,177
Reconciliation of 2022 to 2023
Earnings Attributable to SWEPCo Common Shareholder
(in millions)
Three Months Ended 
June 30,
Six Months Ended 
June 30,
2022 Earnings Attributable to Common Shareholder$76.7 $120.8 
  
Changes in Gross Margin: 
Retail Margins (a)(7.8)(3.4)
Margins from Off-system Sales(0.7)(2.3)
Transmission Revenues(2.2)5.1 
Other Revenues2.0 1.9 
Total Change in Gross Margin(8.7)1.3 
  
Changes in Expenses and Other: 
Other Operation and Maintenance17.7 2.4 
Depreciation and Amortization(7.6)(10.2)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes(1.2)(7.5)
Interest Income(2.3)(0.5)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction1.7 0.6 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost0.3 0.6 
Interest Expense(6.4)1.7 
Total Change in Expenses and Other2.2 (12.9)
  
Income Tax Benefit9.0 10.8 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest1.8 1.6 
  
2023 Earnings Attributable to Common Shareholder$81.0 $121.6 

(a)Heating degree days are calculated on a 55 degree temperature base.
(b)Normal Heating/Cooling represents the thirty-year average of degree days.
(c)Cooling degree days are calculated on a 65 degree temperature base.



(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.

ThirdSecond Quarter of 20172023 Compared to ThirdSecond Quarter of 20162022
Reconciliation of Third Quarter of 2016 to Third Quarter of 2017
Earnings Attributable to SWEPCo Common Shareholder
(in millions)
   
Third Quarter of 2016 $83.3
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (6.9)
Off-system Sales 0.1
Transmission Revenues (8.0)
Other Revenues (0.1)
Total Change in Gross Margin (14.9)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 10.1
Depreciation and Amortization (4.0)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (1.6)
Interest Income 0.7
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.3
Interest Expense 0.7
Total Change in Expenses and Other 6.2
   
Income Tax Expense 10.7
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary (2.3)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest (9.9)
   
Third Quarter of 2017 $73.1

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $7$8 million primarily due to the following:
An $18$11 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 17%14% decrease in cooling degree days.
An $8 million decrease in fuel revenues due to an increase in Arkansas PTCs. This decrease was offset in Income Tax Benefit below.
A $3 million decrease in weather-normalized margins primarily in the industrial and commercial classes.
These decreases were partially offset by:
An $11A $14 million increase due to riderbase rate revenue increases in Arkansas and Louisiana and rider increases in all retail jurisdictions. These increases were partially offset in other expense items below.


Transmission Revenues
107


Expenses and Other and Income Tax Benefit changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $18 million primarily due to the following:
An $11 million decrease due to the capitalization of previously expensed renewable generation pre-construction charges.
A $6 million decrease due to legislation passed in Texas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
Depreciation and Amortization increased $8 million primarily due to an accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgradesincrease in third quarter 2016.amortization of regulatory assets, a higher depreciable base and the NCWF rider. This decrease isincrease was partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.
Retail Margins above.

Expenses and Other, Income TaxInterest Expense and Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest changed between years as follows:

Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $10 increased $6 million primarily due to a $12settlement agreement in Louisiana which provided for $4 million accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgrades in third quarter 2016. This decrease is partially offset by a corresponding decrease in Transmission Revenues above.
of carrying charges on storm-related regulatory assets.
Depreciation and Amortization expensesIncome Tax Benefit increased $4$9 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
Income Tax Expense decreased $11 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This decrease is offset by an increase in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest below.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest increased $10 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This increase is offset byPTCs and a decrease in Income Tax Expensestate taxes. The increase in PTCs was partially offset in Retail Margins above.



NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 Compared to NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162022
Reconciliation of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Earnings Attributable to SWEPCo Common Shareholder
(in millions)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 $149.9
   
Changes in Gross Margin:  
Retail Margins (a) (8.4)
Off-system Sales 3.8
Transmission Revenues (5.5)
Other Revenues 0.3
Total Change in Gross Margin (9.8)
   
Changes in Expenses and Other:  
Other Operation and Maintenance 6.6
Depreciation and Amortization (10.0)
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes (5.8)
Interest Income 2.0
Allowance For Equity Funds Used During Construction (8.3)
Interest Expense (0.7)
Total Change in Expenses and Other (16.2)
   
Income Tax Expense 8.7
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary (9.4)
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest (9.3)
   
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 $113.9

(a)Includes firm wholesale sales to municipals and cooperatives.


The major components of the decreaseincrease in Gross Margin, defined as revenues less the related direct cost of fuel, including consumption of chemicals and emissions allowances, and purchased electricity were as follows:


Retail Margins decreased $8$3 million primarily due to the following:
A $29$19 million decrease in weather-related usage primarily due to a 33%41% decrease in heating degree days and a 12%6% decrease in cooling degree days.
A $9$17 million decrease in FERC generationweather-normalized margins primarily in the residential and wholesale municipal and cooperativeclasses.
A $3 million decrease in fuel revenues due to an annual formula rate true-up.
A $3 million decrease primarily due to lowerincrease in Arkansas PTCs, partially offset by an increase in carrying charges on under-recovered fuel cost recovery.balances.
These decreases were partially offset by:
A $33$36 million increase primarily due to riderbase rate revenue increases in Arkansas and Louisiana Texas and Arkansas,rider increases in all retail jurisdictions. These increases were partially offset in various expensesother expense items below.
Margins from Off-System Sales Transmission Revenues increased $4$5 million primarily due to higher sales prices.
the reversal of a prior period provision for refund.
Transmission Revenues decreased $6 million primarily due to an accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgrades in third quarter 2016. This decrease is offset by a corresponding decrease in Other Operation and Maintenance expenses below.




Expenses and Other and Income Tax Expense, Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary and Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling InterestBenefit changed between years as follows:


Other Operation and Maintenance expenses decreased $7$2 million primarily due to an accrual for SPP sponsor-funded transmission upgradesthe following:
A $9 million decrease due to the capitalization of previously expensed renewable generation pre-construction charges.
A $6 million decrease due to legislation passed in third quarter 2016. This decrease isTexas in May 2023 allowing employee financially based incentives to be recovered.
These decreases were partially offset by a corresponding decreaseby:
A $6 million increase in Transmission Revenues above.
generation-related expenses.
A $6 million increase in accounts receivable factoring expenses primarily due to increased interest rates.
Depreciation and Amortization expenses increased $10 million primarily due to a higher depreciable base.
an increase in amortization of regulatory assets. This increase was partially offset in Retail Margins above.
Taxes Other thanThan Income Taxesincreased $6$8 million primarily due to increased property taxes driven by the investment in the NCWF.
Income Tax Benefit increased $11 million primarily due to an increase in property taxes.
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction decreased $8 million primarily due to the completion of environmental projects.
Income Tax Expense decreased $9 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This decrease is offset by an increase in Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest below.
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary decreased $9 million primarily due to a prior period income tax adjustment for DHLC.
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest increased $9 million primarily due to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine. This increase is offset byPTCs and a decrease in Income Tax Expensestate tax expense. The increase in PTCs was partially offset in Retail Margins above.


108






SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  September 30, September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
REVENUES        
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution $509.5
 $530.5
 $1,321.8
 $1,324.1
Sales to AEP Affiliates 7.7
 8.6
 20.4
 20.0
Other Revenues 0.4
 0.6
 1.4
 1.6
TOTAL REVENUES 517.6
 539.7
 1,343.6
 1,345.7
         
EXPENSES  
  
  
  
Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation 147.5
 158.8
 389.8
 403.3
Purchased Electricity for Resale 40.0
 35.9
 118.7
 97.5
Other Operation 80.3
 89.2
 232.2
 243.3
Maintenance 32.6
 33.8
 106.5
 102.0
Depreciation and Amortization 55.2
 51.2
 158.1
 148.1
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes 25.0
 23.4
 72.6
 66.8
TOTAL EXPENSES 380.6
 392.3
 1,077.9
 1,061.0
         
OPERATING INCOME 137.0
 147.4
 265.7
 284.7
         
Other Income (Expense):  
  
  
  
Interest Income 0.7
 
 2.0
 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction 0.4
 0.1
 1.2
 9.5
Interest Expense (31.9) (32.6) (92.7) (92.0)
         
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE AND EQUITY EARNINGS (LOSS) 106.2
 114.9
 176.2
 202.2
         
Income Tax Expense 22.5
 33.2
 45.2
 53.9
Equity Earnings (Loss) of Unconsolidated Subsidiary 0.4
 2.7
 (4.5) 4.9
         
NET INCOME 84.1
 84.4
 126.5
 153.2
         
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest 11.0
 1.1
 12.6
 3.3
         
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER $73.1
 $83.3
 $113.9
 $149.9
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
REVENUES    
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution$522.5 $520.7 $1,026.2 $1,004.9 
Sales to AEP Affiliates14.5 15.5 26.2 25.5 
Other Revenues0.8 0.4 1.3 1.0 
TOTAL REVENUES537.8 536.6 1,053.7 1,031.4 
EXPENSES    
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation189.9 180.0 399.2 378.2 
Other Operation85.2 103.1 184.4 194.6 
Maintenance45.0 44.8 82.7 74.9 
Depreciation and Amortization85.8 78.2 166.2 156.0 
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes32.1 30.9 68.2 60.7 
TOTAL EXPENSES438.0 437.0 900.7 864.4 
OPERATING INCOME99.8 99.6 153.0 167.0 
Other Income (Expense):   
Interest Income5.3 7.6 10.7 11.2 
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction2.5 0.8 3.0 2.4 
Non-Service Cost Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost3.4 3.1 6.8 6.2 
Interest Expense(40.1)(33.7)(65.1)(66.8)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT AND EQUITY EARNINGS70.9 77.4 108.4 120.0 
Income Tax Benefit(10.0)(1.0)(14.0)(3.2)
Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiary0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 
NET INCOME81.3 78.8 123.1 123.9 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest0.3 2.1 1.5 3.1 
EARNINGS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER$81.0 $76.7 $121.6 $120.8 
The common stock of SWEPCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
The common stock of SWEPCo is wholly-owned by Parent.
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.
109




SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Three and NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
 June 30,June 30,
 2023202220232022
Net Income$81.3 $78.8 $123.1 $123.9 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES    
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0 and $0 for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $0.1 and $0 for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(0.1)(0.1)0.3 — 
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively, and $(0.2) and $(0.2) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, Respectively(0.3)(0.4)(0.6)(0.8)
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(0.4)(0.5)(0.3)(0.8)
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME80.9 78.3 122.8 123.1 
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest0.3 2.1 1.5 3.1 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER$80.6 $76.2 $121.3 $120.0 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
110
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net Income$84.1
 $84.4
 $126.5
 $153.2
        
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAXES 
    
  
Cash Flow Hedges, Net of Tax of $0.2 and $0.2 for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $0.6 and $0.7 for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively0.4
 0.4
 1.1
 1.3
Amortization of Pension and OPEB Deferred Costs, Net of Tax of $(0.1) and $(0.1) for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively, and $(0.3) and $(0.3) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, Respectively(0.2) (0.1) (0.5) (0.5)
        
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME0.2
 0.3
 0.6
 0.8
        
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME84.3
 84.7
 127.1
 154.0
        
Total Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest11.0
 1.1
 12.6
 3.3
        
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SWEPCo COMMON SHAREHOLDER$73.3
 $83.6
 $114.5
 $150.7


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
   SWEPCo Common Shareholder    
 Common
Stock
 Paid-in
Capital
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
 Total
TOTAL EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2015$135.7
 $676.6
 $1,366.3
 $(9.4) $0.5
 $2,169.7
            
Common Stock Dividends    (90.0)     (90.0)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated 
  
  
  
 (3.5) (3.5)
Net Income 
  
 149.9
  
 3.3
 153.2
Other Comprehensive Income 
  
  
 0.8
  
 0.8
TOTAL EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2016$135.7
 $676.6
 $1,426.2
 $(8.6) $0.3
 $2,230.2
            
TOTAL EQUITY - DECEMBER 31, 2016$135.7
 $676.6
 $1,411.9
 $(9.4) $0.4
 $2,215.2
            
Common Stock Dividends 
  
 (82.5)  
  
 (82.5)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated 
  
  
  
 (2.7) (2.7)
Net Income 
  
 113.9
  
 12.6
 126.5
Other Comprehensive Income 
  
  
 0.6
  
 0.6
TOTAL EQUITY - SEPTEMBER 30, 2017$135.7
 $676.6
 $1,443.3
 $(8.8) $10.3
 $2,257.1
SWEPCo Common Shareholder  
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling
Interest
Total
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2021$0.1 $1,092.2 $2,050.9 $6.7 $(0.1)$3,149.8 
Capital Contribution from Parent350.0350.0 
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated(0.8)(0.8)
Net Income44.1 1.0 45.1 
Other Comprehensive Loss(0.3)(0.3)
TOTAL EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20220.1 1,442.2 2,095.0 6.4 0.1 3,543.8 
Capital Contribution from Parent2.22.2 
Common Stock Dividends(12.5)(12.5)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated    (0.7)(0.7)
Net Income  76.7  2.1 78.8 
Other Comprehensive Loss   (0.5) (0.5)
TOTAL EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2022$0.1 $1,444.4 $2,159.2 $5.9 $1.5 $3,611.1 
TOTAL EQUITY – DECEMBER 31, 2022$0.1 $1,442.2 $2,236.0 $(4.2)$0.7 $3,674.8 
Capital Contribution from Parent50.0 50.0 
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated(1.5)(1.5)
Net Income40.6 1.2 41.8 
Other Comprehensive Income0.1 0.1 
TOTAL EQUITY – MARCH 31, 20230.1 1,492.2 2,276.6 (4.1)0.4 3,765.2 
Common Stock Dividends  (50.0)  (50.0)
Common Stock Dividends – Nonaffiliated    (0.6)(0.6)
Net Income  81.0  0.3 81.3 
Other Comprehensive Loss   (0.4) (0.4)
TOTAL EQUITY – JUNE 30, 2023$0.1 $1,492.2 $2,307.6 $(4.5)$0.1 $3,795.5 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118115.

111



SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
CURRENT ASSETS  
Cash and Cash Equivalents
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $0.2 and $84.2, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
$4.6 $88.4 
Advances to Affiliates2.2 2.1 
Accounts Receivable:  
Customers38.6 38.8 
Affiliated Companies63.6 65.4 
Miscellaneous16.7 10.4 
Total Accounts Receivable118.9 114.6 
Fuel
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $0 and $14.2, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
96.7 81.3 
Materials and Supplies
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $4.2 and $4.2, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
86.3 92.1 
Risk Management Assets28.0 16.4 
Accrued Tax Benefits43.8 16.5 
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs213.6 353.0 
Prepayments and Other Current Assets18.0 47.8 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS612.1 812.2 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT  
Electric:  
Generation4,887.9 5,476.2 
Transmission2,536.4 2,479.8 
Distribution2,739.4 2,659.6 
Other Property, Plant and Equipment
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $187.8 and $219.8, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
800.0 804.4 
Construction Work in Progress516.9 369.5 
Total Property, Plant and Equipment11,480.6 11,789.5 
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
(June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 Amounts Include $187.8 and $212.5, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
3,007.7 3,527.3 
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET8,472.9 8,262.2 
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS  
Regulatory Assets1,147.2 1,042.4 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets313.9 262.0 
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS1,461.1 1,304.4 
TOTAL ASSETS$10,546.1 $10,378.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
112
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
CURRENT ASSETS    
Cash and Cash Equivalents
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $0 and $8.7, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 $2.2
 $10.3
Advances to Affiliates 2.0
 169.8
Accounts Receivable:    
Customers 23.5
 48.5
Affiliated Companies 37.6
 29.3
Miscellaneous 20.8
 17.5
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (1.5) (1.2)
Total Accounts Receivable 80.4
 94.1
Fuel
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $43.2 and $34.3, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 93.1
 107.1
Materials and Supplies 68.8
 68.4
Risk Management Assets 12.5
 0.9
Accrued Tax Benefits 14.5
 51.5
Regulatory Asset for Under-Recovered Fuel Costs 13.6
 8.4
Prepayments and Other Current Assets 35.5
 35.5
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 322.6
 546.0
     
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT    
Electric:    
Generation 4,632.9
 4,607.6
Transmission 1,656.4
 1,584.2
Distribution 2,084.2
 2,020.6
Other Property, Plant and Equipment
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $266.6 and $267.5, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 701.6
 670.4
Construction Work in Progress 145.2
 113.8
Total Property, Plant and Equipment 9,220.3
 8,996.6
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
(September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 Amounts Include $162.8 and $155.6, Respectively, Related to Sabine)
 2,670.5
 2,567.1
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT – NET
 6,549.8
 6,429.5
     
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS    
Regulatory Assets 566.4
 551.2
Long-term Risk Management Assets 0.7
 
Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets 116.4
 99.9
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS 683.5
 651.1
     
TOTAL ASSETS $7,555.9
 $7,626.6


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022
(Unaudited)
 June 30,December 31,
 20232022
 (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES  
Advances from Affiliates$32.6 $310.7 
Accounts Payable:  
General260.2 213.1 
Affiliated Companies96.7 81.7 
Short-term Debt – Nonaffiliated3.9 — 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated— 6.2 
Customer Deposits71.0 65.4 
Accrued Taxes118.4 52.8 
Accrued Interest38.9 36.0 
Obligations Under Operating Leases9.2 8.4 
Asset Retirement Obligations43.7 43.7 
Other Current Liabilities110.1 129.7 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES784.7 947.7 
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES  
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated3,645.6 3,385.4 
Deferred Income Taxes1,131.9 1,089.7 
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits766.8 825.7 
Asset Retirement Obligations225.5 237.2 
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations29.8 29.7 
Obligations Under Operating Leases125.0 120.2 
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities41.3 68.4 
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES5,965.9 5,756.3 
TOTAL LIABILITIES6,750.6 6,704.0 
Rate Matters (Note 4)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5)
EQUITY  
Common Stock – Par Value – $18 Per Share:  
Authorized – 3,680 Shares  
Outstanding – 3,680 Shares0.1 0.1 
Paid-in Capital1,492.2 1,442.2 
Retained Earnings2,307.6 2,236.0 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(4.5)(4.2)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY3,795.4 3,674.1 
Noncontrolling Interest0.1 0.7 
TOTAL EQUITY3,795.5 3,674.8 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$10,546.1 $10,378.8 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
113
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
  (in millions)
CURRENT LIABILITIES    
Advances from Affiliates $48.3
 $
Accounts Payable:    
General 120.9
 117.5
Affiliated Companies 38.5
 68.5
Short-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 14.3
 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year – Nonaffiliated 385.4
 353.7
Risk Management Liabilities 0.1
 0.3
Customer Deposits 61.6
 62.1
Accrued Taxes 73.0
 40.9
Accrued Interest 25.1
 45.1
Obligations Under Capital Leases 11.4
 11.8
Other Current Liabilities 77.5
 83.9
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 856.1
 783.8
     
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES    
Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 2,056.1
 2,325.4
Deferred Income Taxes 1,694.5
 1,606.9
Regulatory Liabilities and Deferred Investment Tax Credits 441.3
 438.9
Asset Retirement Obligations 159.0
 147.1
Employee Benefits and Pension Obligations 19.9
 34.1
Obligations Under Capital Leases 60.2
 65.5
Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities 11.7
 9.7
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 4,442.7
 4,627.6
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES 5,298.8
 5,411.4
     
Rate Matters (Note 4) 
 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 5) 
 
     
EQUITY    
Common Stock – Par Value – $18 Per Share:    
Authorized – 7,600,000 Shares    
Outstanding – 7,536,640 Shares 135.7
 135.7
Paid-in Capital 676.6
 676.6
Retained Earnings 1,443.3
 1,411.9
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (8.8) (9.4)
TOTAL COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY 2,246.8
 2,214.8
     
Noncontrolling Interest 10.3
 0.4
     
TOTAL EQUITY 2,257.1
 2,215.2
     
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $7,555.9
 $7,626.6


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022
(in millions)
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 20232022
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
Net Income$123.1 $123.9 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:  
Depreciation and Amortization166.2 156.0 
Deferred Income Taxes28.0 (1.4)
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction(3.0)(2.4)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts(11.1)(36.6)
Property Taxes(49.3)(44.0)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net103.6 (53.6)
Change in Regulatory Assets(43.8)0.3 
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets5.0 45.1 
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities(22.4)10.4 
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:  
Accounts Receivable, Net(4.3)(34.7)
Fuel, Materials and Supplies(12.2)8.7 
Accounts Payable81.2 46.2 
Accrued Taxes, Net39.7 41.3 
Other Current Assets20.5 (7.7)
Other Current Liabilities(36.5)(34.0)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities384.7 217.5 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES  
Construction Expenditures(429.6)(247.0)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net(0.1)153.8 
Acquisition of the North Central Wind Energy Facilities— (658.0)
Other Investing Activities0.8 3.2 
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities(428.9)(748.0)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES  
Capital Contribution from Parent50.0 352.2 
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated346.8 — 
Change in Short-term Debt – Nonaffiliated3.9 — 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net(278.1)213.2 
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated(94.1)(3.1)
Principal Payments for Finance Lease Obligations(16.2)(5.4)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock(50.0)(12.5)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock – Nonaffiliated(2.1)(1.5)
Other Financing Activities0.2 0.1 
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities(39.6)543.0 
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents(83.8)12.5 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period88.4 51.2 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period$4.6 $63.7 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION  
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts$48.7 $63.6 
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes(17.1)20.1 
Noncash Acquisitions Under Finance Leases2.6 2.8 
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of June 30,85.7 63.3 
See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 115.
114
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES  
  
Net Income $126.5
 $153.2
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities:    
Depreciation and Amortization 158.1
 148.1
Deferred Income Taxes 79.8
 141.9
Allowance for Equity Funds Used During Construction (1.2) (9.5)
Mark-to-Market of Risk Management Contracts (12.5) (5.8)
Pension Contributions to Qualified Plan Trust (8.9) (8.3)
Property Taxes (15.4) (13.7)
Deferred Fuel Over/Under-Recovery, Net 2.4
 1.2
Change in Other Noncurrent Assets (2.9) 18.4
Change in Other Noncurrent Liabilities (5.2) (25.8)
Changes in Certain Components of Working Capital:    
Accounts Receivable, Net 12.1
 12.2
Fuel, Materials and Supplies 13.6
 33.4
Accounts Payable (25.7) (17.2)
Accrued Taxes, Net 69.1
 14.1
Accrued Interest (20.0) (20.0)
Other Current Assets 0.7
 (2.4)
Other Current Liabilities (14.6) (24.8)
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities 355.9
 395.0
     
INVESTING ACTIVITIES    
Construction Expenditures (265.3) (315.3)
Change in Advances to Affiliates, Net 167.8
 (297.4)
Other Investing Activities 3.1
 (1.9)
Net Cash Flows Used for Investing Activities (94.4) (614.6)
     
FINANCING ACTIVITIES    
Issuance of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 114.6
 402.2
Change in Short-term Debt – Nonaffiliated 14.3
 
Change in Advances from Affiliates, Net 48.3
 (58.3)
Retirement of Long-term Debt – Nonaffiliated (353.6) (3.3)
Principal Payments for Capital Lease Obligations (8.4) (18.6)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (82.5) (90.0)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock – Nonaffiliated (2.7) (3.5)
Other Financing Activities 0.4
 1.1
Net Cash Flows from (Used for) Financing Activities (269.6) 229.6
     
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (8.1) 10.0
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 10.3
 5.2
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period $2.2
 $15.2
     
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION    
Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $109.4
 $107.6
Net Cash Paid (Received) for Income Taxes (70.5) (66.6)
Noncash Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 2.8
 5.5
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 40.7
 54.3


See Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements of Registrants beginning on page 118.


INDEX OF CONDENSED NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGISTRANTS


The condensed notes to condensed financial statements are a combined presentation for the Registrants. The following list indicates Registrants to which the notes apply. Specific disclosures within each note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise:
NoteRegistrantPage
Number
NoteRegistrant
Page
Number
Significant Accounting MattersAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
New Accounting PronouncementsStandardsAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Comprehensive IncomeAEP APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Rate MattersAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Commitments, Guarantees and ContingenciesAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Impairment, Disposition, andAcquisitions, Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale, Dispositions and ImpairmentsAEP, I&MAEPTCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Benefit PlansAEP, AEP Texas, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Business SegmentsAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Derivatives and HedgingAEP, AEP Texas, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Fair Value MeasurementsAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Income TaxesAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Financing ActivitiesAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo
Variable Interest EntitiesAEP
Revenue from Contracts with CustomersAEP, AEP Texas, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO, SWEPCo

115



1.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING MATTERS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


General


The unaudited condensed financial statements and footnotes were prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete annual financial statements.


In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed interim financial statements reflect all normal and recurring accruals and adjustments necessary for a fair presentationstatement of the net income, financial position and cash flows for the interim periods for each Registrant.  Net income for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 is not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.2023.  The condensed financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the audited 20162022 financial statements and notes thereto, which are included in the Registrants (except AEPTCo)Registrants’ Annual Reports on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on February 27, 2017. AEPTCo should be read in conjunction with the audited 2016 financial statements and notes thereto, which are included on Form S-4 as filed with the SEC on April 5, 2017.23, 2023.


Earnings Per Share (EPS) (Applies to AEP)


Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted averageweighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted averageweighted-average outstanding common shares, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive stock options and awards.


The following tables presenttable presents AEP’s basic and diluted EPS calculations included on the statements of income:
Three Months Ended June 30,
20232022
(in millions, except per share data)
 $/share$/share
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$521.2  $524.5  
Weighted-Average Number of Basic AEP Common Shares Outstanding514.9 $1.01 513.6 $1.02 
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect of Stock-Based Awards1.3 — 1.6 — 
Weighted-Average Number of Diluted AEP Common Shares Outstanding516.2 $1.01 515.2 $1.02 
Six Months Ended June 30,
20232022
(in millions, except per share data)
 $/share$/share
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders$918.2  $1,239.2  
Weighted-Average Number of Basic AEP Common Shares Outstanding514.5 $1.78 509.9 $2.43 
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect of Stock-Based Awards1.4 — 1.5 (0.01)
Weighted-Average Number of Diluted AEP Common Shares Outstanding515.9 $1.78 511.4 $2.42 

116


 Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions, except per share data)
  
 $/share   $/share
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations$556.7
   $(764.2)  
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests12.0
   1.6
  
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Continuing Operations$544.7
  
 $(765.8)  
        
Weighted Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding491.8
 $1.11
 491.7
 $(1.56)
Weighted Average Dilutive Effect of Stock-Based Awards1.2
 (0.01) 0.1
 
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares Outstanding493.0
 $1.10
 491.8
 $(1.56)
Equity Units are potentially dilutive securities and were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, as the dilutive stock price threshold was not met. See Note 12 - Financing Activities for more information related to Equity Units.
 Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions, except per share data)
  
 $/share   $/share
Income from Continuing Operations$1,527.1
   $245.3
  
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests15.2
   5.3
  
Earnings Attributable to AEP Common Shareholders from Continuing Operations$1,511.9
   $240.0
  
        
Weighted Average Number of Basic Shares Outstanding491.8
 $3.07
 491.4
 $0.49
Weighted Average Dilutive Effect of Stock-Based Awards0.6
 
 0.2
 
Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares Outstanding492.4
 $3.07
 491.6
 $0.49


There were no antidilutive shares outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016.2022, respectively.



Nonconsolidated Variable Interest EntityRestricted Cash (Applies to AEP, AEP Texas and SWEPCo)APCo)


SWEPCo recorded prior year income tax adjustments inRestricted Cash primarily includes funds held by trustees for the second quarterpayment of 2017 relatedsecuritization bonds.

Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following tables provide a reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash reported within the balance sheets that sum to DHLC that impacted Equity Earnings (Loss)the total of Unconsolidated Subsidiary in the amountsame amounts shown on the statements of $6 million.cash flows:

June 30, 2023
AEPAEP TexasAPCo
(in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents$304.9 $0.1 $6.8 
Restricted Cash45.8 30.7 15.1 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$350.7 $30.8 $21.9 
Supplementary Cash Flow Information (Applies to AEP)
December 31, 2022
AEPAEP TexasAPCo
(in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents$509.4 $0.1 $7.5 
Restricted Cash47.1 32.7 14.4 
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$556.5 $32.8 $21.9 


117
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
Cash Flow Information 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Cash Paid (Received) for:    
Interest, Net of Capitalized Amounts $613.8
 $637.0
Income Taxes, Net (6.8) 32.2
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:    
Acquisitions Under Capital Leases 44.5
 65.8
Construction Expenditures Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 791.6
 604.8
Construction Expenditures Included in Noncurrent Liabilities as of September 30, 71.8
 
Acquisition of Nuclear Fuel Included in Current Liabilities as of September 30, 0.6
 0.3
Expected Reimbursement for Spent Nuclear Fuel Dry Cask Storage 2.8
 




2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTSSTANDARDS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


UponDuring the FASB’s standard-setting process and upon issuance of final pronouncements,standards, management reviews the new accounting literature to determine its relevance, if any, to the Registrants’ business. The following final pronouncements willThere are no new standards expected to have a material impact on the Registrants’ financial statements.

ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09)

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 clarifying the method used to determine the timing and requirements for revenue recognition on the statements of income. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, determine the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. The amendments in this update also require disclosure of sufficient information to allow users to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flow arising from contracts.

The FASB deferred implementation of ASU 2014-09 under the terms in ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic: 606): Deferral of the Effective Date.” The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted.

Management continues to analyze the impact of the new revenue standard and related ASUs. During 2016 and 2017, revenue contract assessments were completed. Material revenue streams were identified within the AEP System and representative contract/transaction types were sampled. Performance obligations identified within each material revenue stream were evaluated to determine whether the obligations were satisfied at a point in time or over time. Contracts determined to be satisfied over time generally qualified for the invoicing practical expedient since the invoiced amounts reasonably represented the value to customers of performance obligations fulfilled to date. Based upon the completed assessments, management does not expect a material impact to the timing of revenue recognized or net income and plans to elect the modified retrospective transition approach upon adoption.

The evaluation of revenue streams, new contracts and the new revenue standard’s disclosure requirements continues during the fourth quarter of 2017, in particular with respect to various ongoing industry implementation issues. Management will continue to analyze the related impacts to revenue recognition and monitor any new industry implementation issues that arise. Further, given industry conclusions related to implementation issues, including contributions in aid of construction and collectability, management does not anticipate changes to current accounting systems. Management plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018.

ASU 2016-01 “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (ASU 2016-01)

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 enhancing the reporting model for financial instruments. Under the new standard, equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are required to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The new standard also amends disclosure requirements and requires separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheets or the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The amendments also clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The amendments will be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018.



ASU 2016-02 “Accounting for Leases” (ASU 2016-02)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 increasing the transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheets and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. Under the new standard, an entity must recognize an asset and liability for operating leases on the balance sheets. Additionally, a capital lease will be known as a finance lease going forward. Leases with lease terms of 12 months or longer will be subject to the new requirements. Fundamentally, the criteria used to determine lease classification will remain the same, but will be more subjective under the new standard.

The new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The guidance will be applied by means of a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach will require lessees and lessors to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Management continues to analyze the impact of the new lease standard. During 2016 and 2017, lease contract assessments were completed. The AEP System lease population was identified and representative lease contracts were sampled. Based upon the completed assessments, management prepared a system gap analysis to outline new disclosure compliance requirements compared to current system capabilities. Multiple lease system options were also evaluated. Management plans to elect certain of the following practical expedients upon adoption:
118
Practical ExpedientDescription
Overall Expedients (for leases commenced prior to adoption date and must be adopted as a package)Do not need to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases, do not need to reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and do not need to reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
Lease and Non-lease Components (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead account for each lease and associated non-lease component as a single lease component.
Short-term Lease (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases.
Lease termElect to use hindsight to determine the lease term.



Evaluation of new lease contracts continues and the process of implementing a compliant lease system solution began in the third quarter of 2017. Management expects the new standard to impact financial position, but not results of operations or cash flows. Management also continues to monitor unresolved industry implementation issues, including items related to pole attachments, easements and right-of-ways, and will analyze the related impacts to lease accounting. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019.

ASU 2016-09 “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (ASU 2016-09)

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 simplifying the accounting for share-based payment transactions including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statements of cash flows. Under the new standard, all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit on the statements of income. Under current GAAP, excess tax benefits are recognized in additional paid-in capital while tax deficiencies are recognized either as an offset to accumulated excess tax benefits, if any, or on the statements of income.

Management adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017. As a result of the adoption of this guidance, management made an accounting policy election to recognize the effect of forfeitures in compensation cost when they occur. There was an immaterial impact on results of operations and financial position and no impact on cash flows at adoption.



ASU 2016-13 “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13)

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 requiring an allowance to be recorded for all expected credit losses for financial assets. The allowance for credit losses is based on historical information, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The new standard also makes revisions to the other than temporary impairment model for available-for-sale debt securities. Disclosures of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables are further disaggregated by year of origination.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard and, at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-13 effective January 1, 2020.

ASU 2016-18 “Restricted Cash” (ASU 2016-18)

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 clarifying the treatment of restricted cash on the statements of cash flows. Under the new standard, amounts considered restricted cash will be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts on the statements of cash flows.

The new accounting guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. The guidance will be applied by means of a retrospective approach. Management is analyzing the impact of the new standard. Management plans to adopt ASU 2016-18 effective for the 2017 Annual Report.

ASU 2017-07 “Compensation - Retirement Benefits” (ASU 2017-07)

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07 requiring that an employer report the service cost component of pension and postretirement benefits in the same line item or items as other compensation costs. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statements of income separately from the service cost component and outside of a subtotal of income from operations. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization as applicable following labor. For 2016, AEP’s actual non-service cost components were a credit of $66 million, of which approximately 37% was capitalized.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance. Management plans to adopt ASU 2017-07 effective January 1, 2018.

ASU 2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging” (ASU 2017-12)

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12 amending the recognition and presentation requirements for hedge accounting activities. The objectives are to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and reduce the complexity of applying hedge accounting. Under the new standard, the concept of recognizing hedge ineffectiveness within the statements of income for cash flow hedges, which has historically been immaterial to AEP, will be eliminated. In addition, certain required tabular disclosures relating to fair value and cash flow hedges will be modified.

The new accounting guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted for any interim or annual period after August 2017. Management is analyzing the impact of this new standard, including the possibility of early adoption, and at this time, cannot estimate the impact of adoption on net income.


3.  COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants except for AEPTCo. AEPTCo doesAEP only. The impact of AOCI is not have any componentsmaterial to the financial statements of other comprehensive income for any period presented in the condensed financial statements.Registrant Subsidiaries.


Presentation of Comprehensive Income


The following tables provide theAEP’s components of changes in AOCI and details of reclassifications from AOCI for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.AOCI.  The amortization of pension and OPEB AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and OPEB costs. See Note 7 - Benefit Plans for additional details.information.


AEP
 Cash Flow HedgesPension 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023CommodityInterest Rateand OPEBTotal
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of March 31, 2023$65.3 $6.1 $(139.5)$(68.1)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI, Net of Tax5.9 7.0 — 12.9 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation (a)28.3 — — 28.3 
Interest Expense (a)— (0.5)— (0.5)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)— — (5.3)(5.3)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains) Losses— — 1.4 1.4 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Benefit28.3 (0.5)(3.9)23.9 
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit6.0 (0.1)(0.8)5.1 
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit22.3 (0.4)(3.1)18.8 
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)28.2 6.6 (3.1)31.7 
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2023$93.5 $12.7 $(142.6)$(36.4)


Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
 Cash Flow HedgesPension 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022CommodityInterest Rateand OPEBTotal
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of March 31, 2022$404.0 $(13.6)$40.2 $430.6 
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI, Net of Tax257.3 2.0 — 259.3 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI
Generation & Marketing Revenues (a)0.1 — — 0.1 
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation (a)(161.8)— — (161.8)
Interest Expense (a)— 1.1 — 1.1 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)— — (5.4)(5.4)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains) Losses— — 2.1 2.1 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(161.7)1.1 (3.3)(163.9)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(34.0)0.3 (0.7)(34.4)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(127.7)0.8 (2.6)(129.5)
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets to AOCI— — (11.4)(11.4)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — (2.4)(2.4)
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets to AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — (9.0)(9.0)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)129.6 2.8 (11.6)120.8 
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2022$533.6 $(10.8)$28.6 $551.4 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
119


 Cash Flow Hedges      
 Commodity Interest Rate Securities
Available for Sale
 Pension
and OPEB
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017$(36.0) $(10.4) $10.2
 $(125.4) $(161.6)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI(15.8) (2.0) 0.9
 
 (16.9)
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI         
Generation & Marketing Revenues(0.9) 
 
 
 (0.9)
Purchased Electricity for Resale4.9
 
 
 
 4.9
Interest Expense
 0.4
 
 
 0.4
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
 
 (5.0) (5.0)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
 
 5.4
 5.4
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit4.0
 0.4
 
 0.4
 4.8
Income Tax (Expense) Credit1.4
 0.2
 
 0.1
 1.7
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit2.6
 0.2
 
 0.3
 3.1
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(13.2) (1.8) 0.9
 0.3
 (13.8)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017$(49.2) $(12.2) $11.1
 $(125.1) $(175.4)
 Cash Flow HedgesPension 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023CommodityInterest Rateand OPEBTotal
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2022$223.5 $0.3 $(140.1)$83.7 
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI, Net of Tax(189.4)12.2 (12.9)(190.1)
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation (a)75.3 — — 75.3 
Interest Expense (a)— 0.2 — 0.2 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)— — (10.6)(10.6)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains) Losses— — 2.6 2.6 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Benefit75.3 0.2 (8.0)67.5 
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit15.9 — (1.7)14.2 
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit59.4 0.2 (6.3)53.3 
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets from AOCI— — 21.1 21.1 
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — 4.4 4.4 
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — 16.7 16.7 
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(130.0)12.4 (2.5)(120.1)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2023$93.5 $12.7 $(142.6)$(36.4)

AEP
 Cash Flow HedgesPension 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022CommodityInterest Rateand OPEBTotal
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2021$163.7 $(21.3)$42.4 $184.8 
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI, Net of Tax535.5 8.8 — 544.3 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation (a)(209.7)— — (209.7)
Interest Expense (a)— 2.2 — 2.2 
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)— — (10.3)(10.3)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains) Losses— — 4.2 4.2 
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(209.7)2.2 (6.1)(213.6)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(44.1)0.5 (1.3)(44.9)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit(165.6)1.7 (4.8)(168.7)
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets to AOCI— — (11.4)(11.4)
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — (2.4)(2.4)
Reclassifications of KPCo Pension and OPEB Regulatory Assets to AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Benefit— — (9.0)(9.0)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)369.9 10.5 (13.8)366.6 
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2022$533.6 $(10.8)$28.6 $551.4 


Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component(a)Amounts reclassified to the referenced line item on the statements of income.
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
120
 Cash Flow Hedges      
 Commodity Interest Rate 
Securities
Available for Sale
 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016$1.9
 $(16.5) $8.3
 $(111.6) $(117.9)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI(26.7) 
 0.5
 
 (26.2)
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI         
Generation & Marketing Revenues(5.4) 
 
 
 (5.4)
Purchased Electricity for Resale1.8
 
 
 
 1.8
Interest Expense
 0.6
 
 
 0.6
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
 
 (4.8) (4.8)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
 
 5.0
 5.0
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit(3.6) 0.6
 
 0.2
 (2.8)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit(1.3) 0.2
 
 
 (1.1)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit(2.3) 0.4
 
 0.2
 (1.7)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(29.0) 0.4
 0.5
 0.2
 (27.9)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016$(27.1) $(16.1) $8.8
 $(111.4) $(145.8)



AEP

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017


 Cash Flow Hedges      
 Commodity Interest Rate 
Securities
Available for Sale
 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016$(23.1) $(15.7) $8.4
 $(125.9) $(156.3)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI(39.4) 2.7
 2.7
 
 (34.0)
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI         
Generation & Marketing Revenues(5.6) 
 
 
 (5.6)
Purchased Electricity for Resale26.0
 
 
 
 26.0
Interest Expense
 1.2
 
 
 1.2
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
 
 (14.8) (14.8)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
 
 16.0
 16.0
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit20.4
 1.2
 
 1.2
 22.8
Income Tax (Expense) Credit7.1
 0.4
 
 0.4
 7.9
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit13.3
 0.8
 
 0.8
 14.9
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(26.1) 3.5
 2.7
 0.8
 (19.1)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017$(49.2) $(12.2) $11.1
 $(125.1) $(175.4)

AEP

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Cash Flow Hedges      
 Commodity Interest Rate 
Securities
Available for Sale
 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
 (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015$(5.2) $(17.2) $7.1
 $(111.8) $(127.1)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI(17.7) 
 1.7
 
 (16.0)
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI         
Generation & Marketing Revenues(20.7) 
 
 
 (20.7)
Purchased Electricity for Resale14.2
 
 
 
 14.2
Interest Expense
 1.7
 
 
 1.7
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 
 
 (14.6) (14.6)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses
 
 
 15.2
 15.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit(6.5) 1.7
 
 0.6
 (4.2)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit(2.3) 0.6
 
 0.2
 (1.5)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit(4.2) 1.1
 
 0.4
 (2.7)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)(21.9) 1.1
 1.7
 0.4
 (18.7)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016$(27.1) $(16.1) $8.8
 $(111.4) $(145.8)



APCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 $2.5
 $(11.9) $(9.4)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense (0.2) 
 (0.2)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (1.4) (1.4)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.9
 0.9
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2) (0.5) (0.7)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.1) (0.2) (0.3)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.1) (0.3) (0.4)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.1) (0.3) (0.4)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.4
 $(12.2) $(9.8)

APCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016 $3.2
 $(7.1) $(3.9)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense (0.2) 
 (0.2)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (1.2) (1.2)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.7
 0.7
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2) (0.5) (0.7)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 
 (0.2) (0.2)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2) (0.3) (0.5)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.2) (0.3) (0.5)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.0
 $(7.4) $(4.4)




APCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016 $2.9
 $(11.3) $(8.4)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense (0.8) 
 (0.8)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (4.0) (4.0)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 2.6
 2.6
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.8) (1.4) (2.2)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.3) (0.5) (0.8)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.5) (0.9) (1.4)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.5) (0.9) (1.4)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.4
 $(12.2) $(9.8)

APCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015 $3.6
 $(6.4) $(2.8)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense (0.8) 
 (0.8)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (3.8) (3.8)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 2.2
 2.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.8) (1.6) (2.4)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2) (0.6) (0.8)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.6) (1.0) (1.6)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.6) (1.0) (1.6)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.0
 $(7.4) $(4.4)



I&M

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 $(11.3) $(4.2) $(15.5)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 0.5
 
 0.5
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.3) (0.3)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.3
 0.3
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.5
 
 0.5
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.2
 
 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.3
 
 0.3
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income 0.3
 
 0.3
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $(11.0) $(4.2) $(15.2)

I&M

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016 $(12.6) $(3.4) $(16.0)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 0.5
 
 0.5
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.2) (0.2)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.2
 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.5
 
 0.5
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.2
 
 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.3
 
 0.3
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income 0.3
 
 0.3
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $(12.3) $(3.4) $(15.7)



I&M

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016 $(12.0) $(4.2) $(16.2)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 1.5
 
 1.5
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.7) (0.7)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.7
 0.7
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.5
 
 1.5
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.5
 
 0.5
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.0
 
 1.0
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income 1.0
 
 1.0
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $(11.0) $(4.2) $(15.2)

I&M

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015 $(13.3) $(3.4) $(16.7)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 1.5
 
 1.5
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.6) (0.6)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.6
 0.6
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.5
 
 1.5
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.5
 
 0.5
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.0
 
 1.0
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income 1.0
 
 1.0
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $(12.3) $(3.4) $(15.7)



OPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 $2.5
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (0.5)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.5)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.3)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.3)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.2

OPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016 $3.5
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (0.3)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.3)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.1)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.2)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.3



OPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016 $3.0
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (1.3)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (1.3)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.5)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.8)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.8)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.2

OPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015 $4.3
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (1.4)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (1.4)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.4)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (1.0)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (1.0)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.3



PSO

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 $3.0
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (0.4)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.4)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.2)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.8
PSO

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016 $3.8
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (0.3)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.3)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.1)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.2)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.2)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.6



PSO

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016 $3.4
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (1.0)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (1.0)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.4)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.6)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.6)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $2.8

PSO

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges
  Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015 $4.2
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI  
Interest Expense (0.9)
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.9)
Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.3)
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit (0.6)
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Loss (0.6)
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $3.6



SWEPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2017 $(6.7) $(2.3) $(9.0)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 0.6
 
 0.6
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.5) (0.5)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.2
 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.6
 (0.3) 0.3
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.2
 (0.1) 0.1
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.4
 (0.2) 0.2
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 0.4
 (0.2) 0.2
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $(6.3) $(2.5) $(8.8)

SWEPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of June 30, 2016 $(8.2) $(0.7) $(8.9)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 0.7
 
 0.7
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (0.4) (0.4)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.2
 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.7
 (0.2) 0.5
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.3
 (0.1) 0.2
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.4
 (0.1) 0.3
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 0.4
 (0.1) 0.3
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $(7.8) $(0.8) $(8.6)



SWEPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2016 $(7.4) $(2.0) $(9.4)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 1.7
 
 1.7
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (1.5) (1.5)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.7
 0.7
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.7
 (0.8) 0.9
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.6
 (0.3) 0.3
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.1
 (0.5) 0.6
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 1.1
 (0.5) 0.6
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2017 $(6.3) $(2.5) $(8.8)

SWEPCo

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
  Cash Flow Hedges    
  Interest Rate 
Pension
and OPEB
 Total
  (in millions)
Balance in AOCI as of December 31, 2015 $(9.1) $(0.3) $(9.4)
Change in Fair Value Recognized in AOCI 
 
 
Amount of (Gain) Loss Reclassified from AOCI      
Interest Expense 2.0
 
 2.0
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit) 
 (1.4) (1.4)
Amortization of Actuarial (Gains)/Losses 
 0.6
 0.6
Reclassifications from AOCI, before Income Tax (Expense) Credit 2.0
 (0.8) 1.2
Income Tax (Expense) Credit 0.7
 (0.3) 0.4
Reclassifications from AOCI, Net of Income Tax (Expense) Credit 1.3
 (0.5) 0.8
Net Current Period Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) 1.3
 (0.5) 0.8
Balance in AOCI as of September 30, 2016 $(7.8) $(0.8) $(8.6)


4.  RATE MATTERS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


As discussed in AEP’s and AEPTCo’s 2016the 2022 Annual Reports,Report, the Registrants are involved in rate and regulatory proceedings at the FERC and their state commissions. The Rate Matters note within AEP’s and AEPTCo’s 2016the 2022 Annual ReportsReport should be read in conjunction with this report to gain a complete understanding of material rate matters still pending that could impact net income, cash flows and possibly financial condition. The following discusses ratemaking developments in 20172023 and updates AEP’sthe 2022 Annual Report.

Coal-Fired Generation Plants (Applies to AEP, PSO and AEPTCo’s 2016 Annual Reports.SWEPCo)


Compliance with extensive environmental regulations requires significant capital investment in environmental monitoring, installation of pollution control equipment, emission fees, disposal costs and permits. Management continuously evaluates cost estimates of complying with these regulations which has resulted in, and in the future may result in, a decision to retire coal-fired generating facilities earlier than their currently estimated useful lives.

Management is seeking or will seek regulatory recovery, as necessary, for any net book value remaining when the plants are retired. To the extent the net book value of these generation assets is not deemed recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Regulated Generating Units that have been Retired

SWEPCo

In December 2021, the Dolet Hills Power Station was retired. As part of the 2020 Texas Base Rate Case, the PUCT authorized recovery of SWEPCo’s Texas jurisdictional share of the Dolet Hills Power Station through 2046, but denied SWEPCo the ability to earn a return on this investment resulting in a disallowance of $12 million in 2021. As part of the 2021 Arkansas Base Rate Case, the APSC authorized recovery of SWEPCo’s Arkansas jurisdictional share of the Dolet Hills Power Station through 2027, but denied SWEPCo the ability to earn a return on this investment resulting in a disallowance of $2 million in the second quarter of 2022. Also, the APSC did not rule on the prudency of the early retirement of the Dolet Hills Power Station, which will be addressed in a future proceeding. As part of the 2020 Louisiana Base Rate Case, the LPSC authorized the recovery of SWEPCo’s Louisiana share of the Dolet Hills Power Station, through a separate rider, through 2032, but did not rule on the prudency of the early retirement of the plant, which is being addressed in a separate proceeding. See “2020 Texas Base Rate Case” and “2020 Louisiana Base Rate Case” sections below for additional information.

In March 2023, the Pirkey Plant was retired. As part of the 2020 Louisiana Base Rate Case, the LPSC authorized the recovery of SWEPCo’s Louisiana jurisdictional share of the Pirkey Plant, through a separate rider, through 2032. As part of the 2021 Arkansas Base Rate Case, the APSC granted SWEPCo regulatory asset treatment. SWEPCo will request recovery including a weighted average cost of capital carrying charge through a future proceeding. The Texas jurisdictional share of the Pirkey Plant will be addressed in SWEPCo’s next base rate case.

Regulated Generating Units to be Retired

PSO

In 2014, PSO received final approval from the Federal EPA to close Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, in 2026. The plant was originally scheduled to close in 2040. As a result of the early retirement date, PSO revised the useful life of Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, to the projected retirement date of 2026 and the incremental depreciation is being deferred as a regulatory asset. As part of the 2021 Oklahoma Base Rate Case, PSO will continue to recover Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 through 2040.


121


SWEPCo

In November 2020, management announced that it will cease using coal at the Welsh Plant in 2028. As a result of the announcement, SWEPCo began recording a regulatory asset for accelerated depreciation.

The table below summarizes the net book value including CWIP, before cost of removal and materials and supplies, as of June 30, 2023, of generating facilities planned for early retirement:
PlantNet Book ValueAccelerated Depreciation Regulatory AssetCost of Removal
Regulatory Liability
Projected
Retirement Date
Current Authorized
Recovery Period
Annual
Depreciation (a)
(dollars in millions)
Northeastern Plant, Unit 3$120.5 $154.9 $20.4 (b)2026(c)$14.9 
Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3384.3 105.4 58.2 (d)2028(e)(f)38.6 

(a)Represents the amount of annual depreciation that has been collected from customers over the prior 12-month period.
(b)Includes Northeastern Plant, Unit 4, which was retired in 2016. Removal of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4, will be performed with the removal of Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, after retirement.
(c)Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 is currently being recovered through 2040.
(d)Includes Welsh Plant, Unit 2, which was retired in 2016. Removal of Welsh Plant, Unit 2, will be performed with the removal of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3, after retirement.
(e)Represents projected retirement date of coal assets, units are being evaluated for conversion to natural gas after 2028.
(f)Unit 1 is being recovered through 2027 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2037 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions. Unit 3 is being recovered through 2032 in the Louisiana jurisdiction and through 2042 in the Arkansas and Texas jurisdictions.

Dolet Hills Power Station and Related Fuel Operations (Applies to AEP and SWEPCo)

In December 2021, the Dolet Hills Power Station was retired. While in operation, DHLC provided 100% of the fuel supply to Dolet Hills Power Station.

The remaining book value of Dolet Hills Power Station non-fuel related assets are recoverable by SWEPCo through rate riders. As of June 30, 2023, SWEPCo’s share of the net investment in the Dolet Hills Power Station was $108 million, including materials and supplies, net of cost of removal collected in rates.

Fuel costs incurred by the Dolet Hills Power Station are recoverable by SWEPCo through active fuel clauses and are subject to prudency determinations by the various commissions. After closure of the DHLC mining operations and the Dolet Hills Power Station, additional reclamation and other land-related costs incurred by DHLC and Oxbow will continue to be billed to SWEPCo and included in existing fuel clauses. As of June 30, 2023, SWEPCo had a net under-recovered fuel balance of $120 million, inclusive of costs related to the Dolet Hills Power Station billed by DHLC, but excluding impacts of the February 2021 severe winter weather event.

In March 2021, the LPSC issued an order allowing SWEPCo to recover up to $20 million of fuel costs in 2021 and defer approximately $34 million of additional costs with a recovery period to be determined at a later date. In August 2022, the LPSC staff filed testimony recommending fuel disallowances of $72 million, including denial of recovery of the $34 million deferral, with refunds to customers over five years. In September 2022, SWEPCo filed rebuttal testimony addressing the LPSC staff recommendations and a hearing was held in May 2023.

In March 2021, the APSC approved fuel rates that provide recovery of $20 million for the Arkansas share of the 2021 Dolet Hills Power Station fuel costs over five years through the existing fuel clause.

In June 2023, an unopposed settlement agreement was filed with the PUCT that would provide recovery of $48 million of Oxbow mine related costs through 2035. A decision from the PUCT on the unopposed settlement agreement is expected in the fourth quarter of 2023.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

122


Pirkey Plant and Related Fuel Operations (Applies to AEP and SWEPCo)

In March 2023, the Pirkey Plant was retired. SWEPCo is recovering, or will seek recovery of, the remaining net book value of Pirkey Plant non-fuel costs. As of June 30, 2023, SWEPCo’s share of the net investment in the Pirkey Plant was $177 million, including materials and supplies, net of cost of removal. See the “Regulated Generating Units that have been Retired” section above for additional information.Fuel costs are recovered through active fuel clauses and are subject to prudency determinations by the various commissions. As of March 31, 2023, SWEPCo fuel deliveries, including billings of all fixed costs, from Sabine ceased. Additionally, as of June 30, 2023, SWEPCo had a net under-recovered fuel balance of $120 million, inclusive of costs related to the Pirkey Plant billed by Sabine, but excluding impacts of the February 2021 severe winter weather event. Remaining operational, reclamation and other land-related costs incurred by Sabine will be billed to SWEPCo and included in existing fuel clauses.

In June 2023, an unopposed settlement agreement was filed with the PUCT that would provide recovery of $33 million of Sabine related fuel costs through 2035. In July 2023, Texas ALJs issued a proposal for decision that concluded the decision to retire the Pirkey Plant was prudent. A decision from the PUCT on the unopposed settlement agreement and the Texas ALJ proposal for decision is expected in the second half of 2023.

Additionally in July 2023, the LPSC ordered that a separate proceeding be established to review the prudence of the decision to retire the Pirkey Plant, including the costs included in fuel for years starting in 2019 and after.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval (Applies to all Registrants except AEPTCo)
AEP
June 30,December 31,
20232022
 Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
  
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return  
Pirkey Plant Accelerated Depreciation$111.8 $116.5 
Unrecovered Winter Storm Fuel Costs (a)109.5 121.7 
Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 Accelerated Depreciation105.4 85.6 
Dolet Hills Power Station Fuel Costs - Louisiana33.9 32.0 
Texas Mobile Generation Costs29.4 17.6 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval21.4 19.3 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs (b)(c)(d)395.4 407.2 
2020-2022 Virginia Triennial Under-Earnings35.0 37.9 
Plant Retirement Costs – Asset Retirement Obligation Costs25.9 25.9 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval49.3 55.6 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$917.0 $919.3 
(a)Includes $37 million and $37 million of unrecovered winter storm fuel costs recorded as a current regulatory asset as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. See the “February 2021 Severe Winter Weather Impacts in SPP” section below for additional information.
(b)In April 2023, OPCo filed a request with the PUCO for recovery of $34 million in Ohio storm-related costs.
(c)In April 2023, the LPSC issued an order approving the prudence and future recovery of the Louisiana storm-related regulatory assets. See “2021 Louisiana Storm Cost Filing” section below for additional information.
(d)In June 2023, storms in the Oklahoma, Louisiana and Texas service territories caused power outages and extensive damage resulting in the deferral of $52 million, $28 million and $20 million, respectively. Recovery of these storm costs will be addressed in a future request.
123


  AEP
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
 Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return    
Plant Retirement Costs - Unrecovered Plant (a) $209.1
 $159.9
Storm-Related Costs 97.4
 25.1
Plant Retirement Costs - Materials and Supplies 9.1
 9.1
Ohio Capacity Deferral 
 96.7
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 1.1
 1.3
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
  
Storm-Related Costs 42.6
 25.9
Plant Retirement Costs - Asset Retirement Obligation Costs 37.2
 29.6
Cook Plant Uprate Project 36.3
 36.3
Environmental Control Projects 24.3
 24.1
Cook Plant Turbine 15.1
 12.8
Deferred Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project Costs - Michigan 13.0
 8.1
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 25.6
 21.2
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval (b) $510.8
 $450.1


(a)In March 2017, $41 million was reclassified from accumulated depreciation to regulatory assets related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3. As of September 30, 2017, the unrecovered plant balance related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 was $52 million. 
(b)In 2015, APCo recorded a $91 million reduction to accumulated depreciation related to the remaining net book value of plants retired in 2015, primarily in its Virginia jurisdiction.  These plants were normal retirements at the end of their depreciable lives under the group composite method of depreciation. Recovery of the remaining Virginia net book value for the retired plants will be considered in APCo’s next depreciation study. The Virginia SCC staff has requested that the company prepare a depreciation study as of December 31, 2017 and submit that study to the Virginia SCC staff in 2018.

AEP Texas
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
Texas Mobile Generation Costs$29.4 $17.6 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs34.9 26.7 
Vegetation Management Program5.2 5.2 
Texas Retail Electric Provider Bad Debt Expense4.1 4.1 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval13.6 13.4 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$87.2 $67.0 


APCo
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
COVID-19 – Virginia$7.2 $7.0 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs - West Virginia72.0 72.6 
2020-2022 Virginia Triennial Under-Earnings35.0 37.9 
Plant Retirement Costs – Asset Retirement Obligation Costs25.9 25.9 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval5.5 1.1 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$145.6 $144.5 

 I&M
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
  
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$0.1 $0.1 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs - Indiana23.9 21.6 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval2.7 2.0 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$26.7 $23.7 
124


  APCo
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return    
Plant Retirement Costs - Materials and Supplies $9.1
 $9.1
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return    
Plant Retirement Costs - Asset Retirement Obligation Costs 37.2
 29.6
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 0.6
 0.6
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval (a) $46.9
 $39.3
 OPCo
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
  
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs (a)$52.7 $33.8 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval0.1 — 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$52.8 $33.8 

(a)In 2015, APCo recorded a $91 million reduction to accumulated depreciation related to the remaining net book value of plants retired in 2015, primarily in its Virginia jurisdiction.  These plants were normal retirements at the end of their depreciable lives under the group composite method of depreciation. Recovery of the remaining Virginia net book value for the retired plants will be considered in APCo’s next depreciation study. The Virginia SCC staff has requested that the company prepare a depreciation study as of December 31, 2017 and submit that study to the Virginia SCC staff in 2018.
(a)In April 2023, OPCo filed a request with the PUCO for recovery of $34 million in storm costs.
  I&M
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return    
Cook Plant Uprate Project $36.3
 $36.3
Cook Plant Turbine 15.1
 12.8
Deferred Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project Costs - Michigan 13.0
 8.1
Rockport Dry Sorbent Injection System - Indiana 9.4
 6.6
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 1.5
 0.9
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval $75.3
 $64.7

 PSO
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
  
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs (a)$84.6 $25.5 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval0.2 0.1 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$84.8 $25.6 
  OPCo
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return    
Capacity Deferral $
 $96.7
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
  
Smart Grid Costs 
 4.1
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval $
 $100.8
(a)In June 2023, storms caused power outages and extensive damage to the Oklahoma service territory, resulting in the deferral of $52 million. Recovery for these storm costs will be included in a future request.



SWEPCo
June 30,December 31,
20232022
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets(in millions)
  
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return  
Pirkey Plant Accelerated Depreciation$111.8 $116.5 
Unrecovered Winter Storm Fuel Costs (a)109.5 121.7 
Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 Accelerated Depreciation105.4 85.6 
Dolet Hills Power Station Fuel Costs - Louisiana33.9 32.0 
Dolet Hills Power Station12.1 9.7 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval1.9 2.5 
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
Storm-Related Costs (b)(c)48.0 151.5 
Asset Retirement Obligation - Louisiana— 11.8 
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval15.9 16.0 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval$438.5 $547.3 
(a)Includes $37 million and $37 million of unrecovered winter storm fuel costs recorded as a current regulatory asset as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. See the “February 2021 Severe Winter Weather Impacts in SPP” section below for additional information.
  PSO
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return    
Plant Retirement Costs - Unrecovered Plant (a) $133.7
 $84.5
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 0.5
 0.5
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return  
  
Storm-Related Costs 36.7
 20.0
Environmental Control Projects 24.3
 13.1
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 0.4
 
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval $195.6
 $118.1
(b)In April 2023, the LPSC issued an order approving the prudence and future recovery of the Louisiana storm-related regulatory assets. See “2021 Louisiana Storm Cost Filing” section below for additional information.

(a)In March 2017, $41 million was reclassified from accumulated depreciation to regulatory assets related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3. As of September 30, 2017, the unrecovered plant balance related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 was $52 million. 
(c)In June 2023, additional storms in the Louisiana and Texas service territories caused power outages and extensive damage resulting in the deferral of $28 million and $20 million, respectively. Recovery of these storm costs will be addressed in a future request.
  SWEPCo
  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016
Noncurrent Regulatory Assets (in millions)
     
Regulatory Assets Currently Earning a Return    
Plant Retirement Costs - Unrecovered Plant $75.4
 $75.4
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 0.5
 0.8
Regulatory Assets Currently Not Earning a Return    
Rate Case Expense - Texas 4.1
 1.0
Asset Retirement Obligation - Arkansas, Louisiana 3.6
 2.7
Shipe Road Transmission Project - FERC 3.3
 3.1
Environmental Control Projects 
 11.0
Other Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval 2.4
 1.9
Total Regulatory Assets Pending Final Regulatory Approval $89.3
 $95.9


If these costs are ultimately determined not to be recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

125


AEP Texas Rate Matters (Applies to AEP)AEP and AEP Texas)


AEP Texas Interim Transmission and Distribution Rates


As of SeptemberThrough June 30, 2017,2023, AEP Texas’ cumulative revenues from interim base rate increases from 2008 through 2017,that are subject to review are estimated to be $697is approximately $791 million. A base rate review could produceresult in a refund to customers if AEP Texas incurs a disallowance of the transmission or distribution investment on which an interim increase was based. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses, if any, that are reasonably possible of occurring. A revenue decrease, including a refund of interim transmission and distribution rates, could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Hurricane Harvey

In August 2017, Hurricane Harvey hit the coast of Texas, causing power outages in the AEP Texas service territory. AEP Texas has a PUCT approved catastrophe reserve in base rates and can defer incremental storm expenses. AEP Texas currently recovers approximately $1 million of storm costs annually through base rates. As of September 30, 2017, the total balance of AEP Texas’ deferred storm costs is approximately $97 million including approximately $73


million of incremental storm expenses as a regulatory asset related to Hurricane Harvey. Management is currently in the early stages of analyzing the impact of potential insurance claims and recoveries and, at this time, cannot estimate this amount. Any future insurance recoveries received will be applied to and will offset the regulatory asset and property, plant and equipment, as applicable. AEP Texas is currently evaluatingrequired to file for a comprehensive rate review no later than April 5, 2024.

APCo and WPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and APCo)

2020-2022 Virginia Triennial Review

In March 2023, APCo submitted its 2020-2022 Virginia triennial review filing and base rate case with the Virginia SCC as required by state law. APCo requested a $213 million annual increase in Virginia base rates based upon a proposed 10.6% return on common equity. The requested annual increase includes $47 million related to vegetation management and a $35 million increase in depreciation expense. The requested increase in depreciation expense reflects, among other things, the impacts of incremental investments made since APCo’s last depreciation study using property balances as of December 31, 2022. Effective January 1, 2023 and in accordance with past Virginia SCC directives, APCo implemented updated Virginia depreciation rates. APCo’s proposed revenue requirement also includes the recovery optionsof certain costs incurred that partially contributed to APCo’s calculated earnings shortfall for the regulatory asset; however,2020-2022 triennial period. For triennial review periods in which a Virginia utility earns below its authorized ROE band, the utility may file to recover expenses incurred, up to the bottom of the authorized ROE band, related to certain categories of costs, including major storm costs for severe weather events. As of June 30, 2023, APCo deferred approximately $35 million related to previously incurred major storm costs as a result of APCo’s calculation of Virginia earnings below the bottom of its authorized ROE band during the 2020-2022 Triennial Review period.

In July 2023, intervening parties submitted testimony recommending a $69 million annual Virginia base rate increase based on the following significant adjustments: (a) a 9.2% ROE, (b) a $36 million decrease in depreciation expense using a 2040 estimated Amos Plant retirement date for Virginia ratemaking purposes rather than the 2032/2033 retirement date requested by APCo, (c) the removal of $40 million of APCo’s requested increase in vegetation management believesexpense, (d) the assetremoval of $23 million in major storm expenses incurred during the 2020-2022 triennial period, and (e) the removal of $15 million of forecasted spending related to boiler maintenance and generation consumables expense. Virginia staff testimony is probable of recovery. The other named hurricanes did not have a material impact on AEP’s operationsdue in the third quarter of 2017. If2023 and a Virginia SCC order will be issued in the ultimatefourth quarter of 2023.

Any APCo Virginia jurisdictional costs of the incidentthat are not recoveredrecoverable or any refunds of revenues collected from customers during the triennial review period that are ordered by insurance or through the regulatory process, it would have an adverse effect onVirginia SCC for the 2020-2022 Triennial Review period could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


APCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and APCo)ENEC (Expanded Net Energy Cost) Filings

Virginia Legislation Affecting Biennial Reviews


In 2015, amendments to Virginia law governing the regulationApril 2021, APCo and WPCo (the Companies) requested a combined $73 million annual increase in ENEC rates based on a cumulative $55 million ENEC under-recovery as of investor-owned electric utilities were enacted. Under the amended Virginia law, APCo’s existing generationFebruary 28, 2021 and distribution base rates are frozen until after the Virginia SCC rules on APCo’s next biennial review, which APCo will filean $18 million increase in March 2020projected ENEC costs for the 2018 and 2019 test years. These amendments also precludeperiod September 2021 through August 2022. In September 2021, the Virginia SCC from performing biennial reviews of APCo’s earnings for the years 2014 through 2017. APCo’s financial statements adequately address the impact of these amendments. The amendments provide that APCo will absorb its Virginia jurisdictional share of incremental generation and distribution costs incurred from 2014 through 2017 that are associated with severe weather events and/or natural disasters and costs associated with potential asset impairments related to new carbon emission guidelines issued by the Federal EPA.

In 2016, the Virginia SCCWVPSC issued an order that denied the petition of certain APCo industrial customers that requested the issuance ofapproving a declaratory order that would find the amendments to Virginia law suspending biennial reviews unconstitutional and, accordingly, direct APCo to make biennial review filings beginning$7 million overall increase in 2016. In July 2016, the industrial customers filedENEC rates, including an appealapproval for recovery of the Companies’ cumulative $55 million ENEC under-recovery balance and a $48 million reduction in projected costs for the period September 2021 through August 2022. Subsequently, the Companies submitted a request for reconsideration of this order, identifying flaws in the WVPSC’s calculation of forecasted future year fuel expense and purchased power costs.

126


In March 2022, the WVPSC issued an order granting the Companies’ request for reconsideration, in part, and approving $31 million in projected costs for the period September 2021 through August 2022. The order also reopened the 2021 ENEC case to require the Companies to explain the significant growth in the reported under-recovery of ENEC costs and to provide various other information including revised projected costs for the period March 2022 through August 2022. Also, in March 2022, the Companies filed testimony providing the information requested in the WVPSC’s order and requested a $155 million annual increase in ENEC rates effective May 1, 2022. In May 2022, the WVPSC issued an order approving a $93 million overall increase to ENEC rates to recover projected annual ENEC costs. However, the WVPSC stated that actual and projected ENEC costs are still subject to a prudency review.

In April 2022, the Companies submitted their 2022 annual ENEC filing with the Supreme CourtWVPSC requesting a $297 million annual increase in ENEC revenues, inclusive of Virginia. the previously requested $155 million increase, effective September 1, 2022.

In September 2017,2022, following an agreed upon delay in the Supreme Courtproceedings of the Companies’ 2022 ENEC case, certain intervenors submitted testimony recommending disallowances of at least $83 million to the Companies’ historical period ENEC under-recovery balance along with proposals to either securitize the Companies’ remaining ENEC balance or defer recovery of this balance beyond the traditional one-year period. West Virginia affirmedstaff recommended a $13 million increase in ENEC rates pending the outcome of the ENEC prudency review. In February 2023, the WVPSC issued an order stating that the commission will not grant additional rate increases for fuel costs until the WVPSC staff completes its prudency review.

In April 2023, the Companies submitted their 2023 annual ENEC filing with the WVPSC, proposing two alternatives to increase ENEC rates effective September 1, 2023. The first alternative is a $293 million annual increase in ENEC rates comprised of an $89 million increase for current year ENEC expense and a $200 million annual increase for the recovery of the Companies’ February 28, 2023 ENEC under-recovery balances over three years, including debt and equity carrying costs. The second alternative is an $89 million annual increase in ENEC rates with the Companies securitizing approximately $1.9 billion of assets, including: (a) $553 million relating to ENEC under-recoveries as of February 28, 2023, (b) $88 million relating to major storm expense deferrals and (c) $1.2 billion relating to APCo’s West Virginia SCC’s 2016 order.jurisdictional book values of the Amos and Mountaineer Plants and forecasted CCR and ELG investments at these generating facilities. The Companies continue to reflect ENEC under-recovery balances as current on their balance sheets since management cannot assert whether the WVPSC will approve recovery of ENEC under-recovery balances over a time frame different from the traditional one-year period.


Additionally, in April 2023, the Staff submitted the prudency review prepared by an independent consultant retained by the WVPSC staff of the Companies’ operation of the Amos, Mountaineer and Mitchell coal plants that Staff was directed to conduct by the WVPSC in May 2022 (Consultant’s Report). The Consultant’s Report states the opinion of the consultant that the Companies acted imprudently by not taking steps to achieve a 69% capacity factor at their coal-fired plants and recommends applying a disallowance factor of 52.9% to the Companies’ cumulative, September 30, 2022 ENEC under-recovery balance of approximately $430 million. The Consultant’s Report further states the consultant’s opinion that this disallowance factor could also be utilized in future ENEC filings. Adoption of the Consultant’s Report’s findings by the WVPSC could result in a disallowance of up to $285 million. The Companies disagree with the conclusions and recommendations contained in the Consultant’s Report and intend to dispute them in the appropriate proceedings before the WVPSC. In May 2023, the WVPSC established a procedural schedule for the 2021, 2022 and 2023 ENEC cases to begin in the third quarter of 2023, including APCo’s response to the independent consultant’s prudency review.

If any deferred ENEC costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


127


ETT Rate Matters (Applies to AEP)


ETT Interim Transmission Rates


ParentAEP has a 50% equity ownership interest in ETT. Predominantly all of ETT’s revenues are based on interim rate changes that can be filed twice annually and are subject to review and possible true-up in the next filed base rate proceeding. Through SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, AEP’s share of ETT’s cumulative revenues that are subject to review is estimated to be $709 million.approximately $1.6 billion.A base rate review could produce a refund if ETT incurs a disallowance of the transmission investment on which an interim increase was based. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses, if any, that are reasonably possible of occurring. A revenue decrease, including a refund of interim transmission rates, could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses, if any, that are reasonably possible of occurring. ETT is required to file for a comprehensive rate review no later than February 1, 2025, during which the $1.6 billion of cumulative revenues above will be subject to review.


I&M Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and I&M)


2017 IndianaMichigan Power Supply Cost Recovery (PSCR)

In April 2023, I&M received intervenor testimony in I&M’s 2021 PSCR Reconciliation for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2021 recommending disallowances of purchased power costs of $18 million associated with the OVEC Inter-Company Power Agreement (ICPA) and the AEGCo Unit Power Agreement (UPA) that were alleged to be above market in applying the MPSC’s Code of Conduct rules. Michigan staff submitted testimony in I&M’s 2021 PSCR Reconciliation with no recommended disallowances for PSCR costs incurred, including those associated with the OVEC ICPA and the AEGCo UPA. Michigan staff also recommended several options to address I&M’s shortfall in achieving Michigan’s annual one percent energy waste reduction savings level, resulting in potential future disallowed costs of up to approximately $14 million. In June 2023, Michigan staff submitted rebuttal testimony to update their calculation of the 2021 market proxy price resulting in a recommended disallowance of approximately $1 million related to the OVEC ICPA. An MPSC order on I&M’s 2021 PSCR Reconciliation is expected in the fourth quarter of 2023. If any PSCR costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

KPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP)

Fuel Adjustment Clause (FAC) Purchased Power Limitation

In May 2023, KPCo filed an application seeking authority to defer, for future recovery, approximately $12 million of December 2022 purchased power costs not recoverable through its FAC. This requested deferral accounting authority would have enabled KPCo to pursue securitization of these costs. In June 2023, the KPSC denied KPCo’s request for deferral accounting authority.

Also in June 2023, following its order denying KPCo’s request for deferral accounting authority, the KPSC issued an order directing KPCo to show cause why it should not be subject to Kentucky statutory remedies, including fines and penalties, for failure to provide adequate service in its service territory. The KPSC’s show cause order did not make any determination regarding the adequacy of KPCo’s service. In July 2023, KPCo filed a response to the show cause order demonstrating that it has provided adequate service.

KPCo is requesting a prudency determination and recovery mechanism for these costs in its 2023 base rate. Unless and until KPCo is granted a recovery mechanism for these purchased power costs from the KPSC it will impact cash flows and financial condition. Additionally, if any fines or penalties are levied against KPCo relating to the show cause order, it will reduce net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


128


2023 Kentucky Base Rate and Securitization Case


In July 2017, I&MJune 2023, KPCo filed a request with the IURCKPSC for a $263$94 million net annual increase in Indianabase rates based upon a proposed 10.6% return on common equity9.9% ROE with the annual increase to be implemented after June 2018. Upon implementation, this proposed annual increase would be subject to a temporary offsetting $23 million annual reduction to customer bills through December 2018 for a credit adjustment rider related to the timing of estimated in-service dates of certain capital expenditures.no earlier than January 2024. The proposed annual increase includes $78 million related to increased annualfiling proposes no changes in depreciation rates and an $11annual level of storm restoration expense in base rates of approximately $1 million. KPCo also proposed to discontinue tracking of PJM transmission costs through a rider, and to instead collect an annual level of costs through base rates. In addition, KPCo has proposed a rider to recover certain distribution reliability investments and related incremental operation and maintenance expenses. KPCo also requested a prudency determination and recovery mechanism for approximately $16 million increaseof purchased power costs not recoverable through its FAC since its last base case.

In conjunction with its June 2023 filing, KPCo further requested to finance, through the issuance of securitization bonds, approximately $471 million of regulatory assets recorded as of June 2023 including: (a) $289 million of plant retirement costs, (b) $79 million of deferred storm costs related to 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 major storms, (c) $52 million of deferred purchased power expenses and (d) $51 million of under-recovered purchased power rider costs. Plant retirement costs and deferred purchased power expenses have been deemed prudent in prior KPSC decisions. KPCo has requested a prudency determination for the amortizationdeferred storm costs and under-recovered purchase power rider costs since the last base case in this proceeding. Consistent with Kentucky statutory requirements, the present value of certain Cook Plantthe return on accumulated deferred income tax benefits related to plant retirement costs and Rockport Plant regulatory assets. The increase in depreciation rates includes a changedeferred purchase power expenses were proposed to reduce the amount authorized to be financed through securitization.

Intervenor testimony is due in the third quarter of 2023 and an order from the KPSC is expected retirement date for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 from 2044 to 2028 combined with increased investment at the Cook Plant, including the Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Project. A hearing at the IURC is scheduled forin January 2018.2024. If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.



OPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and OPCo)
2017 Michigan Base Rate Case

OVEC Cost Recovery Audits

In May 2017, I&M filed a request withDecember 2021, as part of OVEC cost recovery audits pending before the MPSC for a $52 million annual increase in Michigan base rates based upon a proposed 10.6% return on common equity with the increase to be implemented no later than April 2018. The proposed annual increase includes $23 million related to increased annual depreciation rates and a $4 million increase related to the amortization of certain Cook Plant regulatory assets. The increase in depreciation rates is primarily due to the proposed change in the expected retirement date for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 from 2044 to 2028 combined with increased investment at the Cook Plant related to the Life Cycle Management Project. Additionally, the total proposed increase includes incremental costs related to the Cook Plant Life Cycle Management Program and increased vegetation management expenses. In October 2017, the MPSC staff andPUCO, intervenors filed testimony.  The MPSC staff recommended an annual net revenue increasepositions claiming that costs incurred by OPCo during the 2018-2019 audit period were imprudent and should be disallowed. In May 2022, intervenors filed for rehearing on the 2016-2017 OVEC cost recovery audit period claiming the PUCO’s April 2022 order to adopt the findings of $49 millionthe audit report were unjust, unlawful and unreasonable for multiple reasons, including proposed retirement datesthe position that OPCo recovered imprudently incurred costs. In June 2022, the PUCO granted rehearing on the 2016-2017 audit period for purposes of 2028 for both Rockport Plant, Units 1 (from 2044)further consideration. Management disagrees with these claims and 2 (from 2022) and a return on common equity of 9.8%. The intervenors proposed certain adjustmentsis unable to I&M’s request including no change topredict the current 2044 retirement date of Rockport Plant, Unit 1, but did not propose an annual net revenue increase. Their recommended return on common equity ranged from 9.3% to 9.5%. A hearing at the MPSC is scheduled for November 2017. If anyimpact of these disputes, however, if any costs are not recoverable,disallowed or refunds are ordered it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Rockport Plant, Unit 2 Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)

In October 2016, I&M filed an application with the IURC for approval See "OVEC" section of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (CPCN) to install SCR technology at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 by December 2019. The equipment will allow I&M to reduce emissions of NOx from Rockport Plant, Unit 2 in order for I&M to continue to operate that unit under current environmental requirements. The estimated cost of the SCR project is $274 million, excluding AFUDC, to be shared equally between I&M and AEGCo.  As of September 30, 2017, total costs incurred related to this project, including AFUDC, were approximately $17 million.  The filing included a request for authorization for I&M to defer its Indiana jurisdictional ownership share of costs including investment carrying costs at a weighted average cost of capital (WACC), depreciation over a 10-year period as provided by statute and other related expenses. I&M proposed recovery of these costs using the existing Clean Coal Technology Rider in a future filing subsequent to approval of the SCR project. The AEGCo ownership share of the proposed SCR project will be billable under the Rockport Unit Power Agreement to I&M and KPCo and will be subject to future regulatory approval for recovery. In February 2017, the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and other parties filed testimony with the IURC. The OUCC recommended approval of the CPCN but also stated that any decision regarding recovery of any under-depreciated plant due to retirement should be fully investigated in a base rate case, not in a tracker or other abbreviated proceeding. The other parties recommended either denial of the CPCN or approval of the CPCN with conditions including a cap on the amount of SCR costs allowed to be recoveredNote 17 in the rider2022 Annual Report for additional information on AEP and limitations on other costs related to legal issues involving the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease. A hearing at the IURC was heldOPCo’s investment in March 2017. An order from the IURC is pending. In July 2017, I&M filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of OVEC.

Ohio to remove the requirement to install SCR technology at Rockport Plant, Unit 2. In August 2017, the district court delayed the deadline for installation of the SCR technology until March 2020.ESP Filings

KPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP)

2017 Kentucky Base Rate Case


In June 2017, KPCo filed a request with the KPSC for a $66 million annual increase in Kentucky base rates based upon a proposed 10.31% return on common equity with the increase to be implemented no later than January 2018. The proposed increase includes: (a) lost load since KPCo last changed base rates in July 2015, (b) incremental costs related to OATT charges from PJM not currently recovered from retail ratepayers, (c) increased depreciation expense including updated Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 depreciation rates using a proposed retirement date of 2031, (d) recovery of other Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 generation costs currently recovered through a retail rider and (e) incremental purchased power costs. Additionally, KPCo requested a $4 million annual increase in environmental surcharge revenues.



In August 2017, KPCo submitted a supplemental filing with the KPSC that decreased the proposed annual base rate revenue request to $60 million. The modification was due to a lower interest expense related to June 2017 debt refinancings. In October 2017, various intervenors filed testimony that included annual net revenue increase recommendations ranging from $13 million to $40 million. Intervenors recommended returns on common equity ranging from 8.6% to 8.85%. Intervenors also recommended significant delays in KPCo’s proposed recoveries of: (a) depreciation expense related to Big Sandy Plant, Unit 1 (gas unit), proposing a 30-year depreciable life instead of KPCo’s proposed 15-year life and (b) lease expense on Rockport Plant, Unit 2 billed from AEGCo, proposing that the approximate $100 million of lease expense for the period 2018 through 2022 be deferred with a WACC carrying charge for recovery over 10 years beginning 2023. Testimony on behalf of the Attorney General also discussed that the KPSC could consider disallowing all or a portion of the costs currently being recovered over 25 years through the Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 retirement rider.  As of September 30, 2017, KPCo’s regulatory asset related to the retired Big Sandy Plant, Unit 2 was $289 million. A hearing at the KPSC is scheduled for December 2017.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

OPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and OPCo)

Ohio Electric Security Plan Filings

June 2015 - May 2018 ESP Including PPA Application and Proposed ESP Extension through 2024

In 2013,2023, OPCo filed an application with the PUCO to approve an ESP that included proposed rate adjustments, proposed new riders and the continuation and modification of certain existing riders, including the DIR,Distribution Investment Rider, effective June 20152024 through May 2018.2030. The proposal also involved a PPA rider that would include OPCo’s OVEC contractual entitlement (OVEC PPA) and would allow retail customers to receive a rate stabilizing charge or credit by hedging market-based prices with a cost-based PPA.

In 2015, the PUCO issued orders that approved OPCo’s ESP application, subject to certain modifications, withincludes a return on common equity of 10.2%10.65% on capital costs for certain riders. The orders included: (a) approval of the DIR, with modified rate caps established by the PUCO, (b) authorization to establish a zero rate rider for OPCo’s proposed OVEC PPA and (c) the option for OPCo to reapply in a future proceeding with a more detailed PPA proposal. Also in 2015, OPCo subsequently filed an amended OVEC PPA application that, among other things, addressed certain PPA requirements set forth in a 2015 PUCO order. In 2016, the PUCO issued an additional order on rehearing that approved the DIR caps with additional amendments.

In 2016, the PUCO issued orders that approved a contested stipulation agreement related to the PPA rider application. Additionally, as part of these orders, the PUCO approved (a) recovery of OVEC-related net margin incurred beginning June 2016, (b) potential additional contingent customer credits of up to $15 million to be included in the PPA rider over the final four years of the PPA rider and (c) the limitation that OPCo will not flow through any capacity performance penalties or bonuses through the PPA rider. Additionally, subject to cost recovery and PUCO approval, OPCo agreed to develop and implement, by 2021, a solar energy project(s) of at least 400 MWs and a wind energy project(s) of at least 500 MWs, with 100% of all output to be received by OPCo. AEP affiliates could own up to 50% of these solar and wind projects. In December 2016, in accordance with the stipulation agreement, OPCo filed a carbon reduction plan that focused on fuel diversification and carbon emission reductions. In April 2017, the PUCO rejected all pending rehearing requests and the orders are all now final. In June 2017,2023, intervenors filed appeals to the Supreme Court of Ohio stating that the PUCO’s approval of the OVEC PPA was unlawful and does not provide customers with rate stability.

In November 2016, OPCo refiled its amended ESP extension application and supporting testimony consistent with the terms of the modified and approved stipulation agreement and based upon a 2016 PUCO order. The amended filing proposed to extend the ESP through May 2024 and included (a) an extension of the OVEC PPA rider, (b) a proposed 10.41% return on common equity on capital costsopposing OPCo’s plan for certain riders, (c) the continuation of riders previously approved in the June 2015 - May 2018 ESP, (d) proposed increases in rate caps related to OPCo’s DIR and (e) the addition of various new riders and modifications to existing riders, including the DIR. Staff testimony and a Renewable Resource Rider.


In August 2017, OPCo and various intervenors filed a stipulation agreement with the PUCO. The stipulation extends the term of the ESP through May 2024 and includes: (a) an extension of the OVEC PPA rider, (b) a proposed 10% return on common equity on capital costs for certain riders, (c) the continuation of riders previously approvedhearing is expected in the June 2015 - May 2018 ESP, (d) rate caps related to OPCo’s DIR ranging from $215 million to $290 million for the periods 2018 through 2021 and (e) the additionthird quarter of various new riders, including a Smart City Rider and a Renewable Generation Rider. DIR rate caps will be reset in OPCo’s next distribution base rate case which must be filed by June 2020. In October 2017, intervenor testimony opposing the stipulation agreement was filed recommending: (a) a return on common equity to not exceed 9.3% for riders earning a return on capital investments, (b) that OPCo should file a base distribution case concurrent with the conclusion of the current ESP in May 2018 and (c) denial of certain new riders proposed in OPCo’s ESP extension. The stipulation is subject to review by the PUCO. A hearing at the PUCO is scheduled for November 2017.

2023. If OPCo is ultimately not permitted to fully collect all components of its ESP rates it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


2016 SEET Filing

129


Ohio law providesPSO Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and PSO)

2022 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In November 2022, PSO filed a request with the OCC for the returna $173 million annual increase in rates based upon a 10.4% ROE with a capital structure of significantly excessive earnings to ratepayers upon PUCO review. Significantly excessive earnings are measured by whether the earned return on45.4% debt and 54.6% common equity, net of existing rider revenues and certain incremental renewable facility benefits expected to be provided to customers through riders. The requested annual revenue increase includes a $47 million annual depreciation expense increase related to the accelerated depreciation recovery of the electric utility is significantly in excessNortheastern Plant, Unit 3 through 2026, and a $16 million annual amortization expense increase to recover intangible plant over a 5-year useful life instead of a 10-year useful life. PSO’s request also includes recovery of the return154 MW Rock Falls Wind Facility through base rates to aid PSO’s near-term capacity needs and support compliance with SPP’s 2023 increased capacity planning reserve margin requirements. In November 2022, PSO entered into an agreement to acquire the Rock Falls Wind Facility. In February 2023, the FERC approved PSO’s acquisition of the Rock Falls Wind Facility under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. PSO closed on common equity that was earned during the same period by publicly traded companies, including utilities, that face comparable businessacquisition and financial risk.placed the Rock Falls Wind Facility in-service on March 31, 2023. In addition, PSO requested an annual formula based rate tariff, with an initial one-year pilot term. In the event the requested formula based rate tariff is denied, PSO has requested an expanded rider to recover certain distribution investments and related expenses as well as an expanded transmission cost recovery rider.


In December 2016, OPCo recordedMarch 2023, OCC staff and various intervenors filed testimony supporting net annual revenue changes ranging from a 2016 SEET provision$42 million net decrease to a $49 million net increase based upon ROEs ranging from 8.6% to 9.5%. The difference between PSO’s request and OCC staff and intervenor testimony is primarily due to: (a) rejection of $58PSO’s request to accelerate the recovery of Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 from its original retirement date of 2040 to its projected retirement date of 2026, (b) rejection of PSO’s request to recover intangible plant over a 5-year useful life instead of a 10-year useful life, (c) recommended disallowance of approximately $9 million in certain distribution plant investments, (d) opposition to inclusion of the Rock Falls Wind Facility revenue requirement in customer rates before PSO’s next base rate case, (e) opposition to PSO’s inclusion of its deferred tax asset associated with net operating loss on a stand-alone tax basis in rate base and (f) lower recommended ROEs and recommendations to use certain hypothetical capital structures. Parties also recommended that the OCC reject PSO’s requested formula based rate, and alternate requests for expanded distribution investment and transmission cost recovery riders.

In May 2023, PSO, OCC staff and certain intervenors filed a contested joint stipulation and settlement agreement with the OCC that includes an annual revenue increase of $50 million, based upon projected earnings dataa 9.5% ROE with a capital structure of 45.4% debt and 54.6% common equity, net of existing rider revenues and certain incremental renewable facility benefits expected to be provided to customers through riders. The net annual increase includes recovery of the 154 MW Rock Falls Wind Facility through base rates. Northeastern Plant, Unit 3 will continue to be recovered through 2040 and intangible plant will continue to be recovered over a 10-year useful life. The agreement also provides for companiescertain rider-related items, including: (a) revision to PSO’s Fuel Clause Adjustment Rider to reflect factor updates to occur on a semi-annual basis, (b) approval to defer a weighted average cost of capital carrying charge on PSO’s deferred tax asset associated with net operating loss on a stand-alone tax basis to a regulatory asset and, contingent upon receipt of a supportive private letter ruling from the IRS, approval to collect the deferral through a rider over a 20-month period, and (c) approval to implement an expanded rider to recover certain distribution investments for a three-year term, up to a $6 million annual revenue requirement.

In May 2023, a hearing on the merits of the contested joint stipulation and settlement agreement was held at the OCC and PSO implemented an interim annual base rate increase, subject to refund, based upon the contested joint stipulation and settlement agreement. Through June 30, 2023, PSO’s cumulative revenue from the interim annual base rate increase, subject to refund, is approximately $16 million. In July 2023, an ALJ report was filed and included recommendations generally consistent with the intervenor testimony. The ALJ report is not binding on the OCC. A final order is expected in the comparable utilities risk group. In determining OPCo’s return on equity in relationthird quarter of 2023. If PSO is required to the comparable utilities risk group, management excluded the following items resolved in OPCo’s Global Settlement: (a) gain on the deferral of RSR costs, (b) refunds to customers related to the SEET remands and (c) refunds to customers related to fuel adjustment clause proceedings. In May 2017, OPCo submitted its 2016 SEET filing with the PUCO in which management indicated that OPCo did not have significantly excessive earnings in 2016 based upon actual earnings data for the comparable utilities risk group. Although management believes that OPCo’s adjusted 2016 earnings were not excessive, management did not adjust OPCo’s 2016 SEET provision due to risks that the PUCO could rule against OPCo’s SEET treatmentrefund any of the Global Settlement issues described above$16 million of revenue recorded subject to refund or adopt a different 2016 SEET threshold. If the PUCO orders a refund of 2016 OPCo earnings,any costs are not recoverable, it couldwould reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


PSO
130


SWEPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and PSO)SWEPCo)

2017 Oklahoma Base Rate Case

In June 2017, PSO filed an application for a base rate review with the OCC that requested a net increase in annual revenues of $156 million based upon a proposed 10% return on common equity. The proposed base rate increase includes (a) environmental compliance investments, including recovery of previously deferred environmental compliance related costs currently recorded as regulatory assets, (b) Advanced Metering Infrastructure investments, (c) additional capital investments and costs to serve PSO’s customers, and (d) an annual $42 million depreciation rate increase due primarily to shorter service lives and lower net salvage estimates. As part of this filing, consistent with the OCC’s final order in its previous base rate case, PSO requested recovery through 2040 of Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, including the environmental control investment, and the net book value of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 that was retired in 2016. As of September 30, 2017, the net book value of Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 was $82 million.

In September 2017, various intervenors and the OCC staff filed testimony that included annual net revenue increase recommendations ranging from $28 million to $108 million. The recommended returns on common equity ranged from 8% to 9%. In addition, certain parties recommended investment disallowances that ranged from $27 million to $82 million related to Northeastern Plant, Unit 4 and $38 million associated with capitalized incentives. Also, a party recommended a potential refund of $43 million related to an SPP rider claiming that PSO did not adequately support


the related SPP costs. The combined total impact could result in a write-off and refund of up to approximately $163 million. In addition, if similar plant recovery issues would apply to Northeastern Plant, Unit 3, the net book value of plant, including regulatory assets, materials and supplies inventory and CWIP of $346 million as of September 30, 2017, could be adversely impacted. A hearing at the OCC is scheduled to begin in October 2017.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

SWEPCo Rate Matters (Applies to AEP and SWEPCo)


2012 Texas Base Rate Case


In 2012, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT to increase annual base rates primarily due to the completion of the Turk Plant. In 2013, the PUCT issued an order affirming the prudence of the Turk Plant but determined that the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap established in a previous Certificate of Convenience and Necessity case also limited SWEPCo’s recovery of AFUDC in addition to limits on its recovery of cash construction costs. Additionally, the PUCT deferred consideration of the requested increase in depreciation expense related to the change in the 2016 retirement date of the Welsh Plant, Unit 2.


Upon rehearing in 2014, the PUCT reversed its initial ruling and determined that AFUDC was excluded from the Turk Plant’s Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap. As a result, in the fourth quarter of 2013, SWEPCo reversed $114 million of a previously recorded regulatory disallowances. The resulting annual base rate increase was approximately $52 million.disallowance in 2013. In June 2017, the Texas District Court upheld the PUCT’s 2014 order. In July 2017,order and intervenors filed appeals with the Texas Third Court of Appeals.


If certain partsIn August 2021, the Texas Third Court of Appeals reversed the Texas District Court judgment affirming the PUCT’s order on AFUDC, concluding that the language of the PUCT’s original 2008 order intended to include AFUDC in the Texas jurisdictional capital cost cap, and remanded the case to the PUCT order are overturnedfor future proceedings. SWEPCo and the PUCT submitted Petitions for Review with the Texas Supreme Court in November 2021. In October 2022, the Texas Supreme Court denied the Petitions for Review submitted by SWEPCo and the PUCT. In December 2022, SWEPCo and the PUCT filed requests for rehearing with the Texas Supreme Court. In June 2023, the Texas Supreme Court denied SWEPCo’s request for rehearing and the case was remanded to the PUCT for future proceedings.

Management does not believe a disallowance of capitalized Turk Plant costs or a revenue refund is probable as of June 30, 2023. However, if SWEPCo cannotis ultimately unable to recover itsAFUDC in excess of the Texas jurisdictional sharecapital cost cap, it would be expected to result in a pretax net disallowance ranging from $80 million to $90 million. In addition, if SWEPCo is ultimately unable to recover AFUDC in excess of the Turk Plant investment, including AFUDC,Texas jurisdictional cost cap, SWEPCo estimates it couldmay be required to make customer refunds ranging from $0 to $195 million related to revenues collected from February 2013 through June 2023 and such determination may reduce SWEPCo’s future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.revenues by approximately $15 million on an annual basis.


2016 Texas Base Rate Case


In December 2016, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT for a net increase in Texas annual revenues of $69 million based upon a 10% return on common equity.ROE. In January 2018, the PUCT issued a final order approving a net increase in Texas annual revenues of $50 million based upon a ROE of 9.6%, effective May 2017. The annual increase includes approximately:final order also included: (a) $34 million relatedapproval to additional environmental controls, including those installed at the Welsh Plant, to comply with Federal EPA mandates, (b) $25 million for additional generation, transmission and distribution investments and increased operating costs, (c) $8 million related to transmission cost recovery within SWEPCo’s regional transmission organization and (d) $2 million in additional vegetation management. As part of this filing, SWEPCo requested recovery ofrecover the Texas jurisdictional share (approximately 33%)of environmental investments placed in-service, as of June 30, 2016, at various plants, including Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3, (b) approval of recovery of, but no return on, the Texas jurisdictional share of the net book value of Welsh Plant, Unit 2, through 2042,(c) approval of $2 million in additional vegetation management expenses and (d) the remaining life of Welsh Plant, Unit 3.

In April and May 2017, various intervenors and the PUCT staff filed testimony that included annual net revenue increase recommendations ranging from $36 million to $47 million. The recommended returns on common equity ranged from 9.2% to 9.35%. In addition, no parties recommended approvalrejection of SWEPCo’s proposed transmission cost recovery mechanism.

As a result of the final order, in 2017 SWEPCo: (a) recorded an impairment charge of $19 million, which included $7 million associated with the lack of return on Welsh Plant, Unit 2 and certain parties recommended investment disallowances that could result in write-offs of up to approximately $89 million, including approximately $40$12 million related to environmentalother disallowed plant investments, (b) recognized $32 million of additional revenues, for the period of May 2017 through December 2017, that was surcharged to customers in 2018and $25(c) recognized an additional $7 million of expenses consisting primarily of depreciation expense and vegetation management expense, offset by the deferral of rate case expense. SWEPCo implemented new rates in February 2018 billings. The $32 million of additional 2017 revenues was collected during 2018. In March 2018, the PUCT clarified and corrected portions of the final order, without changing the overall decision or amounts of the rate change. The order has been appealed by various intervenors related to limiting SWEPCo’s recovery of AFUDC on Turk Plant and recovery of Welsh Plant, Unit 2. A hearing atThe appeal will move forward following the conclusion of the 2012 Texas Base Rate Case. If certain parts of the PUCT was heldorder are overturned, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

131


2020 Texas Base Rate Case

In October 2020, SWEPCo filed a request with the PUCT for a $105 million annual increase in June 2017.Texas base rates based upon a proposed 10.35% ROE. The request would move transmission and distribution interim revenues recovered through riders into base rates. Eliminating these riders would result in a net annual requested base rate increase of $90 million primarily due to increased investments. SWEPCo subsequently filed a request with the PUCT lowering the requested annual increase in Texas base rates to $100 million which would result in an $85 million net annual base rate increase after moving the proposed riders to rate base.


In September 2017,January 2022, the Administrative Law Judges (ALJs)PUCT issued their proposal for decision includinga final order approving an annual net revenue increase of $50$39 million includingbased upon a 9.25% ROE. The order also includes: (a) rates implemented retroactively back to March 18, 2021, (b) $5 million of the proposed increase related to vegetation management, (c) $2 million annually to establish a storm catastrophe reserve and (d) the creation of a rider to recover the Dolet Hills Power Station as if it were in rate base until its retirement at the end of 2021 and starting in 2022 the remaining net book value to be recovered as a regulatory asset through 2046. As a result of the final order, SWEPCo recorded a disallowance of $12 million in 2021 associated with the lack of return on the Dolet Hills Power Station. In February 2022, SWEPCo filed a motion for rehearing with the PUCT challenging several errors in the order, which include challenges of the approved ROE, the denial of a reasonable return or carrying costs on the Dolet Hills Power Station and the calculation of the Texas jurisdictional share of the storm catastrophe reserve. In April 2022, the PUCT denied the motion for rehearing. In May 2022, SWEPCo filed a petition for review with the Texas District Court seeking a judicial review of the several errors challenged in the PUCT’s final order.

2020 Louisiana Base Rate Case

In December 2020, SWEPCo filed a request with the LPSC for a $134 million annual increase in Louisiana base rates based upon a proposed 10.35% ROE. SWEPCo’s requested annual increase includes accelerated depreciation related to the Dolet Hills Power Station, Pirkey Power Plant and Welsh Plant, all of which were or are expected to be retired early. SWEPCo also included recovery of Welsh Plant, Unit 2 environmental investments asover the blended useful life of June 30, 2016.Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3. SWEPCo subsequently revised the requested annual increase to $95 million to reflect removing hurricane storm restoration costs from the base case filing, to modify the proposed recovery of the Dolet Hills Power Station and revisions to various proposed amortizations. The ALJs proposedhurricane costs have been requested in a separate storm filing. See “2021 Louisiana Storm Cost Filing” below for more information.

In January 2023, the LPSC approved a settlement which provides for an annual revenue increase of $27 million based upon a 9.5% ROE and includes: (a) a $21 million increase in base rates effective February 2023, (b) a $14 million rider to recover costs of the Dolet Hills Power Station and Pirkey Plant including a return, on common equity(c) an $8 million reduction in fuel rates, (d) an adoption of 9.6%a 3-year formula rate term subject to an earnings band and (e) the recovery of but nocertain incremental SPP charges net of associated revenue and the Louisiana jurisdictional share of the return on Welshand of projected transmission capital investment outside of the earnings band. The settlement agreement did not rule on the prudency of the early retirement of the Dolet Hills Power Station, which is being addressed in a separate proceeding.

The primary differences between SWEPCo’s requested annual rate increase and the agreed upon settlement increase are primarily due to: (a) a reduction in the requested ROE, (b) recovery of the Dolet Hills Power Station and Pirkey Plant Unit 2. The ALJs rejected SWEPCo’s proposed transmission cost recovery mechanism. The estimated potential write-off associatedover ten years in a separate rider mechanism as opposed to base rates with the ALJs proposal is approximately $22 million which includes $9 millionassociated with the lack of a return on Welsh Plant, Unit 2.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, including environmental investments and retirement-related costsaccelerated depreciation rates, (c) maintaining existing depreciation rates for Welsh Plant, Unit 2,Units 1 and 3 and (d) the severing of SWEPCo’s proposed adjustment to include a stand-alone NOLC deferred tax asset in rate base. In January 2023, a hearing was held related to the inclusion of a stand-alone NOLC deferred tax asset in rate base and an order from the LPSC is expected in 2023.


132


2021 Louisiana Storm Cost Filing

In 2020, Hurricanes Laura and Delta caused power outages and extensive damage to the SWEPCo service territories, primarily impacting the Louisiana jurisdiction. Following both hurricanes, the LPSC issued orders allowing Louisiana utilities, including SWEPCo, to establish regulatory assets to track and defer expenses associated with these storms. In February 2021, severe winter weather impacted the Louisiana jurisdiction and in March 2021, the LPSC approved the deferral of incremental storm restoration expenses related to the winter storm. In March 2023, SWEPCo and the LPSC staff filed a joint stipulation and settlement agreement with the LPSC which confirmed the prudency of $150 million of deferred incremental storm restoration expenses. The agreement also authorized an interim carrying charge at a rate of 3.125% until the recovery mechanism is determined in phase two of this proceeding. SWEPCo will submit additional information in phase two of this proceeding to determine whether securitization of the costs is more cost effective than recovery through typical ratemaking. In April 2023, the LPSC issued an order approving the stipulation and settlement agreement.

February 2021 Severe Winter Weather Impacts in SPP

In February 2021, severe winter weather had a significant impact in SPP, resulting in significantly increased market prices for natural gas power plants to meet reliability needs for the SPP electric system. For the time period of February 9, 2021, to February 20, 2021, SWEPCo’s natural gas expenses and purchases of electricity still to be recovered from customers are shown in the table below:
JurisdictionJune 30, 2023December 31, 2022Approved Recovery PeriodApproved Carrying Charge
(in millions)
Arkansas$66.4 $74.9 6 years(a)
Louisiana109.5 121.7(b)(b)
Texas117.8 132.45 years1.65%
Total$293.7 $329.0 

(a)SWEPCo is permitted to record carrying costs on the unrecovered balance of fuel costs at a weighted-cost of capital approved by the APSC.
(b)In March 2021, the LPSC approved a special order granting a temporary modification to the FAC and shortly after SWEPCo began recovery of its Louisiana jurisdictional share of these fuel costs based on a five-year recovery period inclusive of an interim carrying charge equal to the prime rate. The special order states the fuel and purchased power costs incurred will be subject to a future LPSC audit.

If SWEPCo is unable to recover any of the costs relating to the extraordinary fuel and purchases of electricity, or obtain authorization of a reasonable carrying charge on these costs, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.



FERC Rate Matters
Louisiana Turk Plant Prudence Review

FERC 2019 SPP Transmission Formula Rate Challenge (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, PSO and SWEPCo)
Beginning January 2013, SWEPCo’s formula rates, including
In May 2021, certain joint customers submitted a formal challenge at the Louisiana jurisdictional share (approximately 33%)FERC related to the 2020 Annual Update of the Turk Plant, have been collected2019 SPP Transmission Formula Rates of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries within SPP. In March 2022, the FERC issued an order on the formal challenge which ruled in favor of the joint customers on several issues. Management has determined that the result of the order had an immaterial impact to the financial statements of AEP, AEPTCo, PSO and SWEPCo. In November 2022, certain joint customers appealed the FERC decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.


133


Independence Energy Connection Project (Applies to AEP)

In 2016, PJM approved the Independence Energy Connection Project (IEC) and included it in its Regional Transmission Expansion Plan to alleviate congestion. Transource Energy has an ownership interest in the IEC, which is located in Maryland and Pennsylvania. In June 2020, the Maryland Public Service Commission approved a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to construct the portion of the IEC in Maryland. In May 2021, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PAPUC) denied the IEC certificate for siting and construction of the portion in Pennsylvania. Transource Energy appealed the PAPUC ruling in Pennsylvania state court and challenged the ruling before the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. In May 2022, the Pennsylvania state court issued an order affirming the PAPUC decision. The PAPUC decision remains subject to refund pending the outcome of a prudencejurisdiction and review of the Turk Plant investment,United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, which had stayed review of the PAPUC decision until the Pennsylvania state court had ordered. The procedural schedule for this case states that a decision by the United States District Court for the Middle of Pennsylvania will not be reached until the second half of 2023.

In September 2021, PJM notified Transource Energy that the IEC was placed into servicesuspended to allow for the regulatory and related appeals process to proceed in December 2012. In October 2017,an orderly manner without breaching milestone dates in the LPSC staff filed testimony contendingproject agreement. At that SWEPCo failedtime, PJM stated that the IEC has not been cancelled and remains necessary to continuealleviate congestion. PJM continues to evaluate reliability and market efficiency in the suspension or cancellationarea. As of the Turk Plant during its construction period. The testimony also identified five individual items totaling approximately $51 million for potential disallowance relating to Louisiana’s jurisdictionalJune 30, 2023, AEP’s share of Turk Plant. As a result of SWEPCo’s alleged failure to meet its continuing prudence obligations, the LPSC staff recommends one of the following potential unfavorable scenarios: (a) Even sharing of construction cost overruns between SWEPCoIEC capital expenditures was approximately $90 million, located in Total Property, Plant and ratepayers, (b) an imposition of a cost cap similar to Texas or (c) approximately a 1% reduction of the rateEquipment - Net on common equityAEP’s balance sheets. The FERC has previously granted abandonment benefits for the Turk Plant. As SWEPCo has includedthis project, allowing the full valuerecovery of the Turk Plant in rate base since its in-service date, SWEPCo may be required to refund potential over-collections from January 2013 through the date new rates are implemented. As of September 30, 2017,prudently incurred costs if the LPSC adopts oneproject is cancelled for reasons outside the control of these potential scenarios, and disallows the five individual items, pretax write-offs could range from $50 million to $80 million and refund provisions, including interest, could range from $15 million to $27 million. Future annual revenue reductions could range from $3 million to $4 million. Management will continue to vigorously defend against these claims. If the LPSC orders in favor of one of these scenarios, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition. A hearing at the LPSC is scheduled for December 2017.

2015 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing

In April 2015, SWEPCo filed its formula rate plan for test year 2014 with the LPSC.  The filing included a $14 million annual increase, which was effective August 2015.  This increase is subject to LPSC staff review and is subject to refund.Transource Energy. If any of thesethe IEC costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


2017 LouisianaFERC RTO Incentive Complaint (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo and OPCo)

In February 2022, the OCC filed a complaint against AEPSC, American Transmission Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Ohio, alleging the 50 basis point RTO incentive included in Ohio Transmission Owners’ respective transmission formula rates is not just and reasonable and therefore should be eliminated on the basis that RTO participation is not voluntary, but rather is required by Ohio law. In March 2022, AEPSC filed a motion to dismiss the OCC’s February 2022 complaint with the FERC on the basis of certain deficiencies, including that the complaint fails to request relief that can be granted under FERC regulations because AEPSC is not a public utility nor does it have a transmission rate on file with the FERC. In December 2022, the FERC issued an order removing the 50 basis point RTO incentive from OPCo and OHTCo transmission formula rates effective the date of the February 2022 complaint filing and directed OPCo and OHTCo to provide refunds, with interest, within sixty days of the date of its order. In January 2023, both AEPSC and the OCC filed requests for rehearing with the FERC. In February 2023, in compliance with the FERC’s December 2022 order, AEPSC submitted a filing to the FERC to update OPCo and OHTCo 2023 transmission formula rates to exclude the 50 basis point RTO incentive and provide refunds with interest. In April 2023, the FERC approved the updated transmission formula rates for OPCo and OHTCo and issued an Order on Rehearing affirming its February 2022 decision. This decision has been appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Management expects the December 2022 FERC order to reduce AEP’s pretax income by approximately $20 million on an annual basis.

Request to Update AEGCo Depreciation Rates (Applies to AEP and I&M)

In October 2022, AEP, on behalf of AEGCo, submitted proposed revisions to AEGCo’s depreciation rates for its 50% ownership interest in Rockport Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2, reflected in AEGCo’s unit power agreement with I&M. The proposed depreciation rates for these assets reflect an estimated 2028 retirement date for the Rockport Plant. AEGCo’s previous FERC-approved depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 1 were based upon a December 31, 2028 estimated retirement date while AEGCo’s previous FERC-approved depreciation rates for Rockport Plant, Unit 2 leasehold improvements were based upon a December 31, 2022 estimated retirement date in conjunction with the termination of the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease.


134


In December 2022, the FERC issued an order approving the proposed AEGCo Rockport depreciation rates effective January 1, 2023, subject to further review and a potential refund. The FERC established a separate proceeding to review: (a) AEGCo’s acquisition value for the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 base generating asset (original cost and accumulated depreciation), (b) the appropriateness of including future capital additions as stated components in proposed depreciation rates, in light of the Unit Power Agreement’s formula rate mechanism, (c) the appropriateness of applying two different depreciation rates to a single asset common to both units and (d) the accounting and regulatory treatment of Rockport Plant, Unit 2 costs of removal and related AROs. It is expected that the FERC will issue an order on this review in the second half of 2023. This FERC review and subsequent order on these issues could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

FERC 2021 PJM and SPP Transmission Formula Rate FilingChallenge (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo)


In April 2017,March 2023 and May 2023, certain joint customers submitted a complaint and a formal challenge at the LPSC approved an uncontested stipulation agreement that SWEPCoFERC related to the 2022 Annual Update of the 2021 Transmission Formula Rates of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries within PJM and SPP, respectively. These challenges primarily relate to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs in the transmission formula rates of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries. AEPSC, on behalf of the AEP transmission owning subsidiaries within PJM and SPP, filed answers to the joint formal challenge and complaint with the FERC in the second quarter of 2023.

The Registrants transitioned to stand-alone treatment of NOLCs in its PJM and SPP transmission formula rates beginning with the 2022 projected transmission revenue requirements and 2021 true-up to actual transmission revenue requirements, and provided notice of this change in informational filings made with the FERC. Stand-alone treatment of the NOLCs for itstransmission formula rates increased the annual revenue requirements for years 2023, 2022, and 2021 by $60 million, $69 million and $78 million, respectively. Through the second quarter of 2023, the Registrants’ financial statements reflect a provision for refund for certain NOLC revenues billed by PJM and SPP. Also, a certain portion of the impact including NOLCs in the 2021 annual formula rate plantrue-up not yet billed by PJM and SPP is not reflected in the Registrants’ revenues and expenses as the Registrants have not met the requirements of alternative revenue recognition in accordance with the accounting guidance for test year 2015.  The filing included“Regulated Operations”. If the Registrants are required to make refunds as a net annual increase not to exceed $31 million, which was effective May 2017 and includes SWEPCo’s Louisiana jurisdictional share of Welsh Plant and Flint Creek Plant environmental controls which were placed in service in 2016. These environmental costs are subject to prudence review. The net annual increase is subject to refund. In October 2017, SWEPCo filed testimony in Louisiana supporting the prudence of its environmental control investment for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 and Flint Creek power plants. A hearing at the LPSC is scheduled for May 2018. If anyresult of these costs are not recoverable,challenges, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

135
Welsh Plant - Environmental Impact



Management currently estimates that the investment necessary to meet proposed environmental regulations through 2025 for Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 could total approximately $850 million, excluding AFUDC. As of September 30, 2017, SWEPCo had incurred costs of $398 million, including AFUDC, related to these projects.  Management continues to evaluate the impact of environmental rules and related project cost estimates. As of September 30, 2017, the total net book value of Welsh Plant, Units 1 and 3 was $626 million, before cost of removal, including materials and supplies inventory and CWIP. 

In 2016, as approved by the APSC, SWEPCo began recovering $79 million related to the Arkansas jurisdictional share of these environmental costs, subject to prudence review in the next Arkansas filed base rate proceeding. In December 2016, the LPSC approved deferral of certain expenses related to the Louisiana jurisdictional share of environmental controls installed at Welsh Plant. In April 2017, the LPSC approved SWEPCo’s recovery of these deferred costs effective May 2017. SWEPCo’s approved Louisiana jurisdictional share of Welsh Plant deferrals: (a) are $11 million, excluding $6 million of unrecognized equity as of September 30, 2017, (b) is subject to review by the LPSC, and (c) includes a WACC return on environmental investments and the related depreciation expense and taxes. Effective May


2017, SWEPCo began recovering $131 million in investments related to its Louisiana jurisdictional share of environmental costs. SWEPCo has sought recovery of its project costs from retail customers in its current Texas base rate case at the PUCT and is recovering these costs from wholesale customers through SWEPCo’s FERC-approved agreements. See “2016 Texas Base Rate Case” and “2017 Louisiana Formula Rate Filing” disclosures above.

If any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

FERC Rate Matters

PJM Transmission Rates (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M and OPCo)

In June 2016, PJM transmission owners, including AEP’s eastern transmission subsidiaries and various state commissions filed a settlement agreement at the FERC to resolve outstanding issues related to cost responsibility for charges to transmission customers for certain transmission facilities that operate at or above 500 kV. In July 2016, certain parties filed comments at the FERC contesting the settlement agreement. Upon final FERC approval, PJM would implement a transmission enhancement charge adjustment through the PJM OATT, billable through 2025. Management expects that any refunds received would generally be returned to retail customers through existing state rider mechanisms.

FERC Transmission Complaint - AEP’s PJM Participants (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M and OPCo)

In October 2016, several parties filed a joint complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by AEP’s eastern transmission subsidiaries in calculating formula transmission rates under the PJM OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.99% to 8.32%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

Modifications to AEP’s PJM Transmission Rates (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, APCo, I&M and OPCo)

In November 2016, AEP’s eastern transmission subsidiaries filed an application with at the FERC to modify the PJM OATT formula transmission rate calculation, including an adjustment to recover a tax-related regulatory asset and a shift from historical to projected expenses. In March 2017, the FERC accepted the proposed modifications effective January 1, 2017, subject to refund, and set this matter for hearing and settlement procedures. Effective January 1, 2017, the modified PJM OATT formula rates were implemented, subject to refund, based on projected 2017 calendar year financial activity and projected plant balances. If the FERC determines that any of these costs are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

FERC Transmission Complaint - AEP’s SPP Participants (Applies to AEP, AEPTCo, PSO and SWEPCo)

In June 2017, several parties filed a joint complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by AEP’s western transmission subsidiaries in calculating formula transmission rates under the SPP OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.7% to 8.36%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.

FERC SWEPCo Power Supply Agreements Complaint - East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. (ETEC) and Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. (NTEC)

In September 2017, ETEC and NTEC filed a complaint at the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by SWEPCo in calculating their power supply formula rates is excessive and should be reduced from 11.1% to 8.41%, effective upon the date of the complaint. Management believes its financial statements adequately address the impact of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a result of the complaint, including refunds from the date of the complaint filing, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


5.  COMMITMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTINGENCIES


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


The Registrants are subject to certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.  In addition, the RegistrantsRegistrants’ business activities are subject to extensive governmental regulation related to public health and the environment.  The ultimate outcome of such pending or potential litigation against the Registrants cannot be predicted.  Management accrues contingent liabilities only when management concludes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. When management determines that it is not probable, but rather reasonably possible that a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements, management discloses such contingencies and the possible loss or range of loss if such estimate can be made. Any estimated range is based on currently available information and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. Any estimated range of possible loss may not represent the maximum possible loss exposure. Circumstances change over time and actual results may vary significantly from estimates.


For current proceedings not specifically discussed below, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such proceedings would have a material effect on the financial statements. The Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies note within AEP’s and AEPTCo’s 2016the 2022 Annual ReportsReport should be read in conjunction with this report.


GUARANTEES


Liabilities for guarantees are recorded in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Guarantees.”  There is no collateral held in relation to any guarantees.  In the event any guarantee is drawn, there is no recourse to third partiesthird-parties unless specified below.


Letters of Credit (Applies to AEP and OPCo)AEP Texas)


Standby letters of credit are entered into with third parties.third-parties.  These letters of credit are issued in the ordinary course of business and cover items such as natural gas and electricity risk management contracts, construction contracts, insurance programs, security deposits and debt service reserves.


AEP has a $3$4 billion and $1 billion revolving credit facilityfacilities due in June 2021,March 2027 and 2025, respectively, under which up to $1.2 billion may be issued as letters of credit on behalf of subsidiaries. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, no letters of credit were issued under the $3 billion revolving credit facility. In May 2017, the $500 million revolving credit facility due in June 2018 was terminated.


An uncommitted facility gives the issuer of the facility the right to accept or decline each request made under the facility.  AEP also issues letters of credit on behalf of subsidiaries under fivesix uncommitted facilities totaling $445$450 million. In August 2017, AEP executed a $75 million uncommitted letter of credit facility due in August 2018. As of September 30, 2017, theThe Registrants’ maximum future payments for letters of credit issued under the uncommitted facilities as of June 30, 2023 were as follows:
CompanyAmountMaturity
(in millions)
AEP$288.8 July 2023 to June 2024
AEP Texas1.8 July 2023


136

Company Amount Maturity
  (in millions)  
AEP $123.2
 October 2017 to September 2018
OPCo 0.6
 September 2018


AEP has $45 million of variable rate Pollution Control Bonds supported by $46 million of bilateral letters of credit maturing in July 2019.



Guarantees of Third-Party Obligations (Applies to AEP and SWEPCo)

As part of the process to receive a renewal of a Texas Railroad Commission permit for lignite mining, SWEPCo provides guarantees of mine reclamation of $115 million, which increased to $140 million in October 2017.  Since SWEPCo uses self-bonding, the guarantee provides for SWEPCo to commit to use its resources to complete the reclamation in the event the work is not completed by Sabine.  This guarantee ends upon depletion of reserves and completion of final reclamation.  It is estimated the reserves will be depleted in 2036 with final reclamation completed by 2046 at an estimated cost of $76 million.  Actual reclamation costs could vary due to period inflation and any changes to actual mine reclamation.  As of September 30, 2017, SWEPCo has collected $71 million through a rider for final mine closure and reclamation costs, of which $76 million is recorded in Asset Retirement Obligations, offset by $5 million that is recorded in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets on SWEPCo’s balance sheet.

Sabine charges SWEPCo, its only customer, all of its costs.  SWEPCo passes these costs to customers through its fuel clause.

Guarantees of Equity Method Investees (Applies to AEP)


AEPParent has issued aguarantees over the performance guarantee forof certain non-consolidated joint ventures included within the competitive contracted renewables portfolio and NM Renewable Development, LLC. If a 50% owned joint venture which is accounted for as an equity method investment. If the joint venture were to default on payments or performance, AEPParent would be required to make payments on behalf of the joint venture. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the maximum potential amount of future payments associated with thisthe remaining guarantees was $78 million, with the last guarantee was $75 million, which expiresexpiring in December 2019.2045. The non-contingent liability recorded associated with these guarantees was $5 million, with an additional $1 million expected credit loss liability for the contingent portion of the guarantees. In accordance with the accounting guidance for guarantees, the initial recognition of the non-contingent liabilities increased AEP’s carrying values of the respective equity method investees. Management considered historical losses, economic conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts in the calculation of the expected credit loss. As the joint ventures generate cash flows through PPAs, the measurement of the contingent portion of the guarantee liability is based upon assessments of the credit quality and default probabilities of the respective PPA counterparties.


Indemnifications and Other Guarantees


Contracts


The Registrants enter into certain types of contracts which require indemnifications.  Typically these contracts include, but are not limited to, sale agreements, lease agreements, purchase agreements and financing agreements.  Generally, these agreements may include, but are not limited to, indemnifications around certain tax, contractual and environmental matters.  With respect to sale agreements, exposure generally does not exceed the sale price.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, there were no material liabilities recorded for any indemnifications.


AEPSC conducts power purchase-and-sale activity on behalf of APCo, I&M, KPCo and OPCoWPCo, who are jointly and severally liable for activity conducted byon their behalf.  AEPSC also conducts power purchase-and-sale activity on behalf of AEP companies related to power purchase and sale activity.  PSO and SWEPCo, who are jointly and severally liable for activity conducted by AEPSC on behalf of PSO and SWEPCo related to power purchase and sale activity.their behalf.


Master Lease Agreements (Applies to all Registrants except AEPTCo)


The Registrants lease certain equipment under master lease agreements.  Under the lease agreements, the lessor is guaranteed a residual value up to a stated percentage of either the unamortized balance or the equipment cost at the end of the lease term. If the actual fair value of the leased equipment is below the guaranteed residual value at the end of the lease term, the Registrants are committed to pay the difference between the actual fair value and the residual value guarantee.  Historically, at the end of the lease term the fair value has been in excess of the unamortized balance.amount guaranteed.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, the maximum potential loss by the Registrants for these lease agreements assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the lease term iswas as follows:
CompanyMaximum
Potential Loss
(in millions)
AEP$45.0 
AEP Texas10.9 
APCo5.6 
I&M4.2 
OPCo7.0 
PSO4.7 
SWEPCo5.4 


137


Company 
Maximum
Potential Loss
  (in millions)
AEP $42.1
APCo 8.8
I&M 3.4
OPCo 6.0
PSO 3.3
SWEPCo 3.7


Railcar LeaseENVIRONMENTAL CONTINGENCIES (Applies to AEP, I&M and SWEPCo)all Registrants except AEPTCo)

In June 2003, AEP Transportation LLC (AEP Transportation), a subsidiary of AEP, entered into an agreement with BTM Capital Corporation, as lessor, to lease 875 coal-transporting aluminum railcars.  The lease is accounted for as an operating lease.  In January 2008, AEP Transportation assigned the remaining 848 railcars under the original lease agreement to I&M (390 railcars) and SWEPCo (458 railcars).  The assignments are accounted for as operating leases for I&M and SWEPCo.  The initial lease term was five years with three consecutive five-year renewal periods for a maximum lease term of twenty years.  I&M and SWEPCo intend to renew these leases for the full lease term of twenty years via the renewal options.  The future minimum lease obligations are $8 million and $9 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, for the remaining railcars as of September 30, 2017.

Under the lease agreement, the lessor is guaranteed that the sale proceeds under a return-and-sale option will equal at least a lessee obligation amount specified in the lease, which declines from 83% of the projected fair value of the equipment under the current five-year lease term to 77% at the end of the 20-year term.  I&M and SWEPCo have assumed the guarantee under the return-and-sale option.  The maximum potential losses related to the guarantee are $8 million and $10 million for I&M and SWEPCo, respectively, as of September 30, 2017, assuming the fair value of the equipment is zero at the end of the current five-year lease term.  However, management believes that the fair value would produce a sufficient sales price to avoid any loss.

AEPRO Boat and Barge Leases (Applies to AEP)

In October 2015, AEP signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell its commercial barge transportation subsidiary, AEPRO, to a nonaffiliated party. The sale closed in November 2015. Certain of the boat and barge leases acquired by the nonaffiliated party are subject to an AEP guarantee in favor of the lessor, ensuring future payments under such leases with maturities up to 2027. As of September 30, 2017, the maximum potential amount of future payments required under the guaranteed leases was $52 million. In certain instances, AEP has no recourse against the nonaffiliated party if required to pay a lessor under a guarantee, but AEP would have access to sell the leased assets in order to recover payments made by AEP under the guarantee to the extent of the sale proceeds. As of September 30, 2017, AEP’s boat and barge lease guarantee liability was $7 million, of which $1 million was recorded in Other Current Liabilities and $6 million was recorded in Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on AEP’s balance sheet.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTINGENCIES


The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (Superfund) and State Remediation


By-products from the generation of electricity include materials such as ash, slag, sludge, low-level radioactive waste and SNF.  Coal combustion by-products, which constitute the overwhelming percentage of these materials, are typically treated and deposited in captive disposal facilities or are beneficially utilized.  In addition, the generation plants and transmission and distribution facilities have used asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls and other hazardous and nonhazardousnon-hazardous materials.  The Registrants currently incur costs to dispose of these substances safely. For remediation processes not specifically discussed, management does not anticipate that the liabilities, if any, arising from such remediation processes would have a material effect on the financial statements.

In 2008, I&M received a letter from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) concerning conditions at a site under state law and requesting I&M take voluntary action necessary to prevent and/or mitigate public harm.  I&M started remediation work in accordance with a plan approved by MDEQ. In 2014, I&M recorded an accrual for remediation at certain additional sites in Michigan. As a result of receiving approval of completed remediation work from the MDEQ in March 2015, I&M’s accrual was reduced. As of September 30, 2017, I&M’s accrual for all of these sites is $3 million.  As the remediation work is completed, I&M’s cost may change as new information becomes available concerning either the level of contamination at the sites or changes in the scope of remediation.  Management cannot predict the amount of additional cost, if any.




NUCLEAR CONTINGENCIES (APPLIES TO(Applies to AEP ANDand I&M)


I&M owns and operates the two-unit 2,278 MW Cook Plant under licenses granted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).Commission.  I&M has a significant future financial commitment to dispose of SNF and to safely decommission and decontaminate the plant.  The licenses to operate the two nuclear units at the Cook Plant expire in 2034 and 2037.  The operation of a nuclear facility also involves special risks, potential liabilities and specific regulatory and safety requirements.  By agreement, I&M is partially liable, together with all other electric utility companies that own nuclear generation units, for a nuclear power plant incident at any nuclear plant in the U.S. Should a nuclear incident occur at any nuclear power plant in the U.S., the resultant liability could be substantial.


Westinghouse Electric Company Bankruptcy Filing (Applies to AEP and I&M)

In March 2017, Westinghouse filed a petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  It intends to reorganize, not cease business operations. However, it is in the early stages of the bankruptcy process and it is unclear whether the company can successfully reorganize.  Westinghouse and I&M have a number of significant ongoing contracts relating to reactor services, nuclear fuel fabrication, and ongoing engineering projects.  The most significant of these relate to Cook Plant fuel fabrication.  I&M is evaluating how this reorganization affects these contracts.  Westinghouse has stated that it intends to continue performance on I&M’s contracts, but given the importance of upcoming dates in the fuel fabrication process for Cook Plant, and their vital part in Cook Plant’s ongoing operations, I&M continues to work with Westinghouse in the bankruptcy proceedings to avoid any interruptions to that service. In the unlikely event Westinghouse rejects I&M’s contracts, or is unable to reorganize or sell its profitable businesses in the bankruptcy, Cook Plant’s operations would be significantly impacted and potentially shut down temporarily as I&M seeks other vendors for these services.

OPERATIONAL CONTINGENCIES


Rockport Plant Litigation (AppliesRelated to AEP and I&M)Ohio House Bill 6 (HB 6)


In 2019, Ohio adopted and implemented HB 6 which benefits OPCo by authorizing rate recovery for certain costs including renewable energy contracts and OVEC’s coal-fired generating units. OPCo engaged in lobbying efforts and provided testimony during the legislative process in connection with HB 6. In July 2013,2020, an investigation led by the Wilmington Trust CompanyU.S. Attorney’s Office resulted in a federal grand jury indictment of an Ohio legislator and associates in connection with an alleged racketeering conspiracy involving the adoption of HB 6. After AEP learned of the criminal allegations against the Ohio legislator and others relating to HB 6, AEP, with assistance from outside advisors, conducted a review of the circumstances surrounding the passage of the bill. Management does not believe that AEP was involved in any wrongful conduct in connection with the passage of HB 6.

In August 2020, an AEP shareholder filed a complaintputative class action lawsuit in U.S.the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOhio against AEGCoAEP and I&M alleging that it will be unlawfully burdened bycertain of its officers for alleged violations of securities laws. In December 2021, the terms of the modified NSR consent decree after the Rockport Plant, Unit 2 lease expiration in December 2022.  The terms of the consent decree allow the installation of environmental emission control equipment, repowering or retirement of the unit.  The plaintiffs further allege that the defendants’ actions constitute breach of the lease and participation agreement.  The plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that the defendants breached the lease, must satisfy obligations related to installation of emission control equipment and indemnify the plaintiffs.  The New York court granted a motion to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  In October 2013, a motion to dismiss the case was filed on behalf of AEGCo and I&M.

In January 2015, thedistrict court issued an opinion and order grantingdismissing the motion in part and denyingsecurities litigation complaint with prejudice, determining that the motion in part.complaint failed to plead any actionable misrepresentations or omissions. The court dismissed certain ofplaintiffs did not appeal the plaintiffs’ claims, including the dismissal without prejudice of plaintiffs’ claims seeking compensatory damages. Several claims remained, including the claim for breach of the participation agreement and a claim alleging breach ofruling.

In January 2021, an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In June 2015, AEGCo and I&MAEP shareholder filed a motion for partial judgment on the claims seeking dismissal of the breach of participation agreement claim as well as any claim for indemnification of costs associated with this case. The plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint to add another claim under the lease and also filed a motion for partial summary judgment. In November 2015, AEGCo and I&M filed a motion to strike the plaintiffs’ motion for partial judgment and filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim.



In March 2016, the court entered an opinion and orderderivative action in favor of AEGCo and I&M, dismissing certain of the plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and dismissing claims for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and further dismissing plaintiffs’ claim for indemnification of costs. By the same order, the court permitted plaintiffs to move forward with their claim that AEGCo and I&M failed to exercise prudent utility practices in the maintenance and operation of Rockport Plant, Unit 2. In April 2016, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of all remaining claims with prejudice and the court subsequently entered a final judgment. In May 2016, plaintiffs filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on whether AEGCo and I&M are in breach of certain contract provisions that plaintiffs allege operate to protect the plaintiffs’ residual interests in the unit and whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiffs’ claims that AEGCo and I&M breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

In April 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an opinion reversing the district court’s decisions which had dismissed certain of plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract and remanding the case to the district court to enter summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor consistent with that ruling. In April 2017, AEGCo and I&M filed a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which was granted. In June 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued an amended opinion and judgment which reverses the district court’s dismissal of certain of the owners’ claims under the lease agreements, vacates the denial of the owners’ motion for partial summary judgment and remands the case to the district court for further proceedings.  The amended opinion and judgment also affirms the district court’s dismissal of the owners’ breach of good faith and fair dealing claim as duplicative of the breach of contract claims and removes the instruction to the district court in the original opinion to enter summary judgment in favor of the owners.

In July 2017, AEP filed a motion with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio seekingpurporting to modifyassert claims on behalf of AEP against certain AEP officers and directors. In February 2021, a second AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the consent decreeCourt of Common Pleas of Franklin County, Ohio. In April 2021, a third AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and a fourth AEP shareholder filed a similar derivative action in the Supreme Court for the State of New York, Nassau County. These derivative complaints allege the officers and directors made misrepresentations and omissions similar to eliminatethose alleged in the obligation to install future controls at Rockport Plant, Unit 2 if AEP does not acquire ownershipputative securities class action lawsuit filed against AEP. The derivative complaints together assert claims for: (a) breach of that Unit,fiduciary duty, (b) waste of corporate assets, (c) unjust enrichment, (d) breach of duty for insider trading and to modify the consent decree in other respects to preserve the environmental benefits(e) contribution for violations of sections 10(b) and 21D of the consent decree. In October 2017,Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and seek monetary damages and changes to AEP’s corporate governance and internal policies among other forms of relief. The court entered a scheduling order in the ownersNew York state court derivative action staying the case other than with respect to briefing the motion to dismiss. AEP filed substantive and forum-based motions to dismiss on April 29, 2022. On September 13, 2022, the New York state
138


court granted the forum-based motion to dismiss with prejudice and the plaintiff subsequently filed a notice of appeal with the New York appellate court. On January 20, 2023, the New York plaintiff filed a motion to stay their claimsintervene in the pending Ohio federal court action and withdrew his appeal in New York. The two derivative actions pending in federal district court in Ohio have been consolidated and the plaintiffs in the consolidated action filed an amended complaint. AEP filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint and subsequently filed a brief in opposition to the New York plaintiffs’ motion to intervene in the consolidated action in Ohio. On March 20, 2023, the federal district court issued an order granting the motion to dismiss with prejudice and denying the New York plaintiffs’ motion to intervene. On April 20, 2023, one of the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit of the Ohio federal district court order dismissing the consolidated action and denying the intervention. On June 15, 2022, the Ohio state court entered an order continuing the stays of that case until January 2018, to afford time forthe final resolution of AEP’s motion to modify the consent decree.

Managementconsolidated derivative actions pending in Ohio federal district court. The defendants will continue to defend against the claims. Given that the district court dismissed plaintiffs’ claims seeking compensatory relief as premature, and that plaintiffs have yet to present a methodology for determining or any analysis supporting any alleged damages, managementManagement is unable to determine a range of potential losses that areis reasonably possible of occurring.

Natural Gas Markets Lawsuits (Applies to AEP)


In 2002,March 2021, AEP received a lawsuitlitigation demand letter from counsel representing a purported AEP shareholder. The litigation demand letter was commenceddirected to the Board of Directors of AEP (AEP Board) and contained factual allegations involving HB 6 that were generally consistent with those in Los Angeles County California Superior Court against numerous energy companies, including AEP, alleging violations of California law through alleged fraudulent reporting of false natural gas price and volume information with an intent to affect the market price of natural gas and electricity.  AEP was dismissed from the case.  A number of similar cases were alsoderivative litigation filed in state and federal courtscourt. The shareholder that sent the letter has since withdrawn the litigation demand, which is now terminated and of no further effect. In April 2023, AEP received a litigation demand from counsel representing the purported AEP shareholder who filed the dismissed derivative action in several states making essentiallyNew York state court and unsuccessfully tried to intervene in the same allegations underconsolidated derivative actions in Ohio federal or state laws against the same companies.  AEPcourt. The litigation demand letter is among the companies named as defendants in some of these cases.  AEP settled, received summary judgment or was dismissed from all of these cases.  The plaintiffs appealed the Nevada federal district court’s dismissal of several cases involving AEP companiesdirected to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  In April 2013, the appellate court reversed in part,AEP Board and affirmed in part, the district court’s orders in these cases.  The United States Supreme Court affirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion.  The cases were remanded to the district court for further proceedings. AEP had four pending cases, of which three were class actions and one was a single plaintiff case. In February 2017, a settlement was reachedcontains factual allegations involving HB 6 that are generally consistent with those in the single plaintiff case. A settlement was also reached in the three class actions and the district court issued final approval of the settlement in June 2017.



Gavin Landfill Litigation (Applies to AEP and OPCo)

In August 2014, a complaint wasderivative litigation filed in state and federal court. The letter demands, among other things, that the Mason County, West Virginia Circuit Court against AEP AEPSC, OPCo andBoard undertake an individual supervisor alleging wrongful death and personal injury/illness claims arising out of purported exposure to coal combustion by-product waste at the Gavin Plant landfill.  As a result of OPCo transferring its generation assets to AGR, the outcome of this complaint will be the responsibility of AGR. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of 77 plaintiffs, consisting of 39independent investigation into alleged legal violations by certain current and former contractorsdirectors and officers, and that AEP commence a civil action for breaches of the landfillfiduciary duty and 38 family members of those contractors.  Twelve of the family members are pursuing personal injury/illnessrelated claims (non-working direct claims) and the remainder are pursuing loss of consortium claims.against any individuals who allegedly harmed AEP. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, as well as medical monitoring.  In September 2014, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, contending the case should be filedAEP Board will act in Ohio. In August 2015, the court denied the motion. Defendants appealed that decisionresponse to the West Virginia Supreme Court. In February 2016, a decision was issued by the court denying the appeal and remanding the case to the West Virginia Mass Litigation Panel (WVMLP), rather than back to the Mason County, West Virginia Circuit Court. Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the twelve non-working direct claims under Ohio law. The WVMLP denied the motion and defendants again appealed to the West Virginia Supreme Court. The West Virginia Supreme Court granted the appeal of the twelve non-working direct claims and heard oral argument in March 2017. In June 2017, the West Virginia Supreme Court reversed the WVMLP decision and dismissed the claims of the twelve non-working direct claim plaintiffs. Management will continue to defend against the remaining claims and believes the provision recorded is adequate.letter as appropriate. Management is unable to determine a range of potential additional losses that areis reasonably possible of occurring.



In May 2021, AEP received a subpoena from the SEC’s Division of Enforcement seeking various documents, including documents relating to the passage of HB 6 and documents relating to AEP’s policies and financial processes and controls. In August 2022, AEP received a second subpoena from the SEC seeking various additional documents relating to its ongoing investigation. AEP is cooperating fully with the SEC’s investigation, which has included taking testimony from certain individuals and inquiries regarding Empowering Ohio’s Economy, Inc., which is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization, and related disclosures. Although the outcome of the SEC’s investigation cannot be predicted, management does not believe the results of this investigation will have a material impact on financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


Claims for Indemnification Made by Owners of the Gavin Power Station

In November 2022, the Federal EPA issued a final decision denying Gavin Power LLC’s requested extension to allow a CCR surface impoundment at the Gavin Power Station to continue to receive CCR and non-CCR waste streams after April 11, 2021 until May 4, 2023 (the Gavin Denial). As part of the Gavin Denial, the Federal EPA made several determinations related to the CCR Rule (see “Environmental Issues - Coal Combustion Residual (CCR) Rule” section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information), including a determination that the closure of the 300 acre unlined fly ash reservoir (FAR) is noncompliant with the CCR Rule in multiple respects. The Gavin Power Station was formerly owned and operated by AEP and was sold to Gavin Power LLC and Lightstone Generation LLC in 2017. Pursuant to the PSA, AEP maintained responsibility to complete closure of the FAR in accordance with the closure plan approved by the Ohio EPA which was completed in July 2021. The PSA contains indemnification provisions, pursuant to which the owners of the Gavin Power Station have notified AEP they believe they are entitled to indemnification for any damages that may result from these claims, including any future enforcement or litigation resulting from the Federal EPA’s determinations of noncompliance with various aspects of the CCR Rule as part of the Gavin Denial. The owners of the Gavin Power Station have also sought indemnification for landowner claims for property damage allegedly caused by modifications to the FAR. Management does not believe that the owners of the Gavin Power Station have any valid claim for indemnity or otherwise against AEP under the PSA. In addition, Gavin Power
139


LLC, several AEP subsidiaries, and other parties have filed Petitions for Review of the Gavin Denial with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that is reasonably possible of occurring.


Claims for Damages Related to Sabine Lignite Mining Agreement

In May 2023, North American Coal Corporation (NACC) and Sabine, a subsidiary of NACC, filed suit against SWEPCo in Texas state court for breach of the Lignite Mining Agreement (LMA) between Sabine and SWEPCo. NACC and Sabine assert that the terms of the LMA require SWEPCo to continue operating the Pirkey Plant and obtaining coal from the Sabine mine through 2035 and that SWEPCo has breached the agreement by closing the plant. The complaint seeks both injunctive relief ordering SWEPCo to cease demolition and reclamation activities at the Pirkey Plant and the Sabine mine and damages, which Sabine has asserted are $85 million in lost fees. The parties have entered into a standstill agreement staying both the litigation and certain demolition and reclamation activities at the Pirkey Plant and the Sabine mine. SWEPCo will continue to defend against the claims. Management is unable to determine a range of potential losses that is reasonably possible of occurring.




140


6. IMPAIRMENT, DISPOSITION, ANDACQUISITIONS, ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE, DISPOSITIONS AND IMPAIRMENTS


The disclosures in this note apply to AEP only unless indicated otherwise.


IMPAIRMENTACQUISITIONS


Merchant Generating Assets (Generation & MarketingNorth Central Wind Energy Facilities (Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment) (Applies to AEP, PSO and SWEPCo)


In September 2016, due2020, PSO and SWEPCo received regulatory approvals to AEP’s ongoing evaluationacquire the NCWF, comprised of strategic alternatives for its merchant generation assets, declining forecaststhree Oklahoma wind facilities totaling 1,484 MWs, on a fixed cost turn-key basis. PSO and SWEPCo own undivided interests of future energy45.5% and capacity prices,54.5% of the NCWF, respectively. In total, the three wind facilities cost approximately $2 billion and consist of Traverse (998 MW), Maverick (287 MW) and Sundance (199 MW). Output from the NCWF serves retail load in PSO’s Oklahoma service territory and both retail and FERC wholesale load in SWEPCo’s service territories in Arkansas and Louisiana. The Oklahoma and Louisiana portions of the NCWF revenue requirement, net of PTC benefit, are recoverable through authorized riders until the amounts are reflected in base rates. Recovery of the Arkansas portion of the NCWF revenue requirement through base rates was approved by the APSC in May 2022. The NCWF are subject to various regulatory performance requirements. If these performance requirements are not met, PSO and SWEPCo would recognize a decreasing likelihood of cost recovery through regulatory proceedings or legislationliability to refund retail customers.

In March 2022, PSO and SWEPCo acquired respective undivided ownership interests in the stateentity that owned Traverse during its development and construction for $1.2 billion, the third of Ohio providing for the recovery of AEP’s existing Ohio merchant generation assets, AEP performed an impairment analysis atthree NCWF acquisitions. Immediately following the unit level onacquisition, PSO and SWEPCo liquidated the remaining merchant generationentity and simultaneously distributed the Traverse assets in accordance withproportion to their undivided ownership interests. Traverse was placed in-service in March 2022. PSO and SWEPCo apply the joint plant accounting guidancemodel to account for impairments of long-lived assets. Based on the impairment analysis performedtheir respective undivided interests in the third quarterassets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of 2016, AEP recorded a pretax impairment of $2.3 billion in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on the statement of operations.NCWF projects.


Through the third quarter of 2017, AEP recorded an additional pretax impairment of $4 million in Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on AEP’s statements of income related to the Merchant Coal-fired Generation Assets. In addition, AEP recorded a $7 million pretax impairment as Asset Impairments and Other Related Charges on AEP’s statements of income related to the sale of Zimmer Plant. The sale is further discussed in the “Disposition” section of this note.

DISPOSITION

Zimmer Plant (Generation & Marketing Segment)

In February 2017, AEP signed an agreement to sell its 25.4% ownership share of Zimmer Plant to a nonaffiliated party.  The transaction closed in the second quarter of 2017 and did not have a material impact on net income, cash flows or financial condition.  The Income before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings of Zimmer Plant was immaterial for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Tanners Creek PlantRock Falls Wind Facility (Vertically Integrated Utilities Segment) (Applies to AEP and I&M)PSO)


In October 2016, I&M sold its retired Tanners Creek plant site including its associated asset retirement obligations (AROs)November 2022, PSO entered into an agreement to a nonaffiliated party.  I&M paid $92 million andacquire the nonaffiliated party took ownershipRock Falls Wind Facility. In February 2023, the FERC approved PSO’s acquisition of the Tanners Creek plant site assetsRock Falls Wind Facility under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act. In March 2023, PSO acquired an ownership interest in the entity that owned Rock Falls during its development and assumed responsibilityconstruction for environmental liabilities$146 million. In accordance with the guidance for “Business Combinations,” management determined that the acquisition of the Rock Falls Wind Facility represents an asset acquisition. The current and AROs, including ash pond closure, asbestos abatement and decommissioning and demolition.  I&M did not record a gain or lossnoncurrent Obligations Under Operating Leases related to this sale and will address recoveryRock Falls were not material as of Tanner’s Creek deferred costs in future rate proceedings. If anyJune 30, 2023. See the “2022 Oklahoma Base Rate Case” section of the costs associated with Tanner’s Creek are not recoverable, it could reduce future net income and impact financial condition.Note 4 for additional information.


Gavin, Waterford, Darby and Lawrenceburg Plants (Generation & Marketing Segment)
In September 2016, AEP signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement to sell AGR’s Gavin, Waterford and Darby Plants as well as AEGCo’s Lawrenceburg Plant totaling 5,329 MWs of competitive generation assets to a nonaffiliated party. The sale closed in January 2017 for $2.2 billion, which was recorded in Investing Activities on the statement of cash flows. The net proceeds from the transaction were $1.2 billion in cash after taxes, repayment of debt associated with these assets including a make whole payment related to the debt, payment of a coal contract associated with one of the plants and transaction fees. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $226 million that was recorded in Gain on Sale of Merchant Generation Assets on AEP’s statement of income.



ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE


Gavin, Waterford, DarbyTermination of Planned Disposition of KPCo and Lawrenceburg PlantsKTCo (Vertically Integrated Utilities and AEP Transmission Holdco Segments) (Applies to AEP and AEPTCo)

In October 2021, AEP entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA) to sell KPCo and KTCo to Liberty Utilities Co., a subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (Liberty), for approximately a $2.85 billion enterprise value.The SPA was subsequently amended in September 2022 to reduce the purchase price to approximately $2.646 billion.The sale required approval from the KPSC and from the FERC under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act.The SPA contained certain termination rights if the closing of the sale did not occur by April 26, 2023.

In May 2022, the KPSC approved the sale of KPCo to Liberty subject to certain conditions contingent upon the closing of the sale.In December 2022, the FERC issued an order denying, without prejudice, authorization of the proposed sale stating the applicants failed to demonstrate the proposed transaction will not have an adverse effect on rates.In February 2023, a new filing for approval under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act was submitted.In March 2023, the KPSC and other intervenors made filings recommending the FERC reject AEP and Liberty’s new Section 203 application seeking approval of the sale.

141


In April 2023, AEP, AEPTCo and Liberty entered into a Mutual Termination Agreement (Termination Agreement) terminating the SPA.The parties entered into the Termination Agreement as all of the conditions precedent to closing the sale could not be satisfied prior to April 26, 2023.

The impact of the Termination Agreement did not have a material impact on AEP’s statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023. Upon reverting to a held and used model in the first quarter of 2023, AEP was required to present its investment in the Kentucky Operations at the lower of fair value or historical carrying value which resulted in a $335 million reduction recorded in Property, Plant and Equipment. The reduced investment in KPCo’s assets is being amortized over the 30 year average useful life of the KPCo assets.

Planned Disposition of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio (Generation & Marketing Segment)

(Applies to AEP)

In February 2022, AEP management announced the initiation of a process to sell all or a portion of AEP Renewables’ competitive contracted renewables portfolio within the Generation & Marketing segment. As of June 30, 2023, the competitive contracted renewable portfolio assets totaled 1.4 gigawatts of generation resources representing consolidated solar and wind assets, with a net book value of $1.2 billion, and a 50% interest in four joint venture wind farms, totaling $246 million, accounted for as equity method investments. In late January 2023, AEP received final bids from interested parties. In February 2023, AEP’s Board of Directors approved management’s plan to sell the competitive contracted renewables portfolio and AEP signed an agreement to sell the competitive contracted renewables portfolio to a nonaffiliated party for $1.5 billion including the assumption of project debt.

AEP expects to close on the sale in the third quarter of 2016, management determined Gavin, Waterford, Darby2023, pending approval from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. AEP expects to receive cash proceeds, net of taxes, transaction fees and Lawrenceburg Plantsother customary closing adjustments, of approximately $1.2 billion.

Management concluded the consolidated assets within the competitive contracted renewables portfolio met the classificationaccounting requirements to be presented as Held for Sale in the first quarter of held2023 based on the receipt of final bids, Board of Director approval to consummate a sale transaction and the signing of the sale agreement. AEP recorded a pretax loss of $112 million ($88 million after-tax) in the first quarter of 2023 as a result of reaching Held for sale. Accordingly,Sale status. Management concluded the impact of any other than temporary decline in the fair value of the four plants’joint venture wind farms was not material. Any changes to the book value or carrying value of these assets, or the anticipated sale price, could further reduce future net income and impact financial condition.

The Income Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit) of the competitive contracted renewables portfolio was not material to AEP for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.


142


In March 2023, AEP ceased recognition of depreciation on the competitive contracted renewable portfolio assets due to their classification as Held for Sale on the balance sheets. The major classes of the assets and liabilities have been recorded aspresented in Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Held for Sale on AEP’sthe balance sheet assheets of December 31, 2016 and asAEP are shown in the table below. following table:
June 30, 2023
(in millions)
ASSETS
Accounts Receivable and Accrued Unbilled Revenues$10.0 
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net1,394.0 
Other Classes of Assets that are not Major67.3 
Total Major Classes of Assets Held for Sale1,471.3 
Loss on the Expected Sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio (net of $23.5 million of Income Taxes)(88.5)
Assets Held for Sale$1,382.8 
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable$4.6 
Asset Retirement Obligations31.0 
Obligations Under Operating Leases21.6 
Other Classes of Liabilities that are not Major7.6 
Liabilities Held for Sale$64.8 

The Income before Income Tax Expensefour joint venture wind farms totaling $246 million as of June 30, 2023, which are included in the plan of sale, continue to be classified as Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets and $183 million attributable to noncontrolling interests continues to be classified as Noncontrolling Interests on AEP’s consolidated balance sheets.

DISPOSITIONS

Disposition of Mineral Rights (Generation & Marketing Segment) (Applies to AEP)

In June 2022, AEP closed on the sale of certain mineral rights to a nonaffiliated third-party and received $120 million of proceeds. The sale resulted in a pretax gain of $116 million in the second quarter of 2022.

IMPAIRMENTS

Flat Ridge 2 Wind LLC (Generation & Marketing Segment) (Applies to AEP)

In June 2022, as a result of Flat Ridge 2’s deteriorating financial performance, sale negotiations and AEP’s ongoing evaluation and ultimate decision to exit the investment in the near term, AEP determined a decline in the fair value of AEP’s investment in Flat Ridge 2 was other than temporary. In accordance with the accounting guidance for “Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures”, in the second quarter of 2022 AEP recorded a pretax other than temporary impairment charge of $186 million which is presented in Equity Earnings (Losses) of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries on AEP’s Statement of Income. AEP’s determination of fair value utilized the four plantsaccounting guidance for Fair Value Measurement market approach to valuation and was approximately $116 millionbased on negotiations to sell the investment to a non-affiliate. In September 2022, AEP signed a Purchase and Sale Agreement with a nonaffiliate for AEP’s interest in Flat Ridge 2. The transaction closed in the three months ended September 30, 2016fourth quarter of 2022 and $42 million (excludinghad an immaterial impact on the $226 million pretax gain) and $312 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.financial statements at closing.
143
  December 31,
  2016
Assets:  
Fuel $145.5
Materials and Supplies 49.4
Property, Plant and Equipment - Net 1,756.2
Other Class of Assets That Are Not Major 0.1
Total Assets Classified as Held for Sale on the Balance Sheets $1,951.2
   
Liabilities:  
Long-term Debt $134.8
Waterford Plant Upgrade Liability 52.2
Asset Retirement Obligations 36.7
Other Classes of Liabilities That Are Not Major 12.2
Total Liabilities Classified as Held for Sale on the Balance Sheets $235.9




7.  BENEFIT PLANS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants except AEPTCo unless indicated otherwise.AEPTCo.


AEP sponsors a qualified pension plan and two unfunded nonqualified pension plans.  Substantially all AEP employees are covered by the qualified plan or both the qualified and a nonqualified pension plan.  AEP also sponsors OPEB plans to provide health and life insurance benefits for retired employees.


Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)


The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) by Registrant for the plans:Pension Plans


AEP
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$23.6 $2.1 $2.2 $3.0 $2.1 $1.4 $1.9 
Interest Cost54.8 4.6 6.6 6.2 5.0 2.7 3.5 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(84.8)(7.0)(11.1)(11.1)(8.5)(4.6)(4.9)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss0.4 — — — — — — 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$(6.0)$(0.3)$(2.3)$(1.9)$(1.4)$(0.5)$0.5 

Three Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$30.8 $2.8 $2.8 $4.1 $2.9 $1.8 $2.7 
Interest Cost37.1 3.0 4.4 4.2 3.2 1.7 2.3 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(63.3)(5.2)(8.1)(8.1)(6.2)(3.4)(3.6)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss15.7 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.4 0.8 0.9 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost$20.3 $1.9 $0.9 $1.9 $1.3 $0.9 $2.3 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$47.2 $4.1 $4.5 $6.0 $4.2 $2.8 $3.8 
Interest Cost109.6 9.2 13.2 12.4 9.9 5.4 7.0 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(169.6)(14.0)(22.3)(22.1)(17.0)(9.2)(9.7)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss0.7 — — — — — — 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$(12.1)$(0.7)$(4.6)$(3.7)$(2.9)$(1.0)$1.1 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$61.6 $5.6 $5.7 $8.1 $5.6 $3.7 $5.3 
Interest Cost74.1 6.0 8.8 8.4 6.6 3.5 4.6 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(126.7)(10.5)(16.2)(16.1)(12.4)(6.8)(7.3)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss31.5 2.6 3.6 3.5 2.8 1.5 1.9 
Net Periodic Benefit Cost$40.5 $3.7 $1.9 $3.9 $2.6 $1.9 $4.5 

 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$24.1
 $21.4
 $2.8
 $2.6
Interest Cost50.7
 52.9
 14.8
 15.3
Expected Return on Plan Assets(71.1) (70.1) (25.3) (26.8)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)0.3
 0.6
 (17.3) (17.3)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss20.7
 21.0
 9.2
 7.8
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$24.7
 $25.8
 $(15.8) $(18.4)
144

 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$72.3
 $64.3
 $8.4
 $7.7
Interest Cost152.3
 158.7
 44.5
 45.7
Expected Return on Plan Assets(213.5) (210.2) (76.0) (80.3)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)0.8
 1.7
 (51.8) (51.8)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss62.1
 62.9
 27.5
 23.5
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$74.0
 $77.4
 $(47.4) $(55.2)


OPEB


APCo
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$1.2 $0.1 $0.2 $0.2 $0.1 $— $0.1 
Interest Cost11.5 0.9 1.9 1.4 1.1 0.6 0.7 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(27.4)(2.2)(4.0)(3.4)(3.0)(1.4)(1.8)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(15.7)(1.4)(2.3)(2.1)(1.5)(1.0)(1.2)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss3.7 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 
Net Periodic Benefit Credit$(26.7)$(2.3)$(3.7)$(3.5)$(2.9)$(1.6)$(1.9)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$1.9 $0.1 $0.2 $0.3 $0.1 $0.1 $0.2 
Interest Cost7.3 0.5 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.4 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(27.5)(2.2)(4.0)(3.5)(2.9)(1.5)(1.8)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(17.9)(1.5)(2.6)(2.5)(1.8)(1.1)(1.3)
Net Periodic Benefit Credit$(36.2)$(3.1)$(5.3)$(4.8)$(3.8)$(2.2)$(2.5)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$2.3 $0.2 $0.3 $0.4 $0.2 $0.1 $0.2 
Interest Cost23.1 1.8 3.7 2.7 2.3 1.2 1.4 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(54.8)(4.5)(8.0)(6.8)(5.9)(2.9)(3.6)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(31.5)(2.7)(4.6)(4.3)(3.1)(2.0)(2.4)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss7.4 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.5 
Net Periodic Benefit Credit$(53.5)$(4.6)$(7.5)$(7.1)$(5.7)$(3.2)$(3.9)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Service Cost$3.7 $0.2 $0.4 $0.5 $0.3 $0.2 $0.3 
Interest Cost14.6 1.1 2.3 1.7 1.5 0.7 0.9 
Expected Return on Plan Assets(55.0)(4.5)(8.1)(6.9)(5.9)(3.0)(3.7)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit(35.7)(3.0)(5.2)(4.9)(3.6)(2.2)(2.6)
Net Periodic Benefit Credit$(72.4)$(6.2)$(10.6)$(9.6)$(7.7)$(4.3)$(5.1)





145
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017
2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$2.3
 $2.1
 $0.3
 $0.2
Interest Cost6.5
 6.8
 2.6
 2.7
Expected Return on Plan Assets(8.9) (8.8) (4.1) (4.3)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
 (2.5) (2.5)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss2.6
 2.6
 1.6
 1.4
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$2.5
 $2.7
 $(2.1) $(2.5)


 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$7.0
 $6.1
 $0.8
 $0.7
Interest Cost19.3
 20.4
 7.9
 8.1
Expected Return on Plan Assets(26.8) (26.5) (12.3) (13.0)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)0.1
 0.1
 (7.5) (7.5)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss7.8
 8.0
 4.7
 4.1
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$7.4
 $8.1
 $(6.4) $(7.6)

I&M
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$3.5
 $3.1
 $0.4
 $0.4
Interest Cost6.1
 6.3
 1.7
 1.7
Expected Return on Plan Assets(8.6) (8.4) (3.1) (3.2)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
 (2.3) (2.4)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss2.4
 2.5
 1.1
 0.9
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$3.4
 $3.5
 $(2.2) $(2.6)
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$10.5
 $9.2
 $1.2
 $1.1
Interest Cost18.2
 19.0
 5.2
 5.2
Expected Return on Plan Assets(25.9) (25.2) (9.2) (9.6)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)0.1
 0.1
 (7.0) (7.1)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss7.3
 7.4
 3.3
 2.8
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$10.2
 $10.5
 $(6.5) $(7.6)


OPCo
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$1.8
 $1.6
 $0.3
 $0.2
Interest Cost4.8
 5.1
 1.6
 1.8
Expected Return on Plan Assets(6.9) (6.9) (3.0) (3.3)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
 (1.7) (1.7)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss2.0
 2.1
 1.1
 0.9
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$1.7
 $1.9
 $(1.7) $(2.1)
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$5.6
 $4.9
 $0.7
 $0.6
Interest Cost14.5
 15.4
 5.0
 5.3
Expected Return on Plan Assets(20.9) (20.8) (9.0) (9.7)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)0.1
 0.1
 (5.2) (5.2)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss5.9
 6.1
 3.3
 2.8
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$5.2
 $5.7
 $(5.2) $(6.2)

PSO
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$1.7
 $1.5
 $0.2
 $0.2
Interest Cost2.6
 2.8
 0.8
 0.8
Expected Return on Plan Assets(3.9) (3.9) (1.4) (1.5)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 0.1
 (1.1) (1.1)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss1.1
 1.1
 0.5
 0.4
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$1.5
 $1.6
 $(1.0) $(1.2)
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$4.9
 $4.6
 $0.5
 $0.5
Interest Cost8.0
 8.4
 2.4
 2.4
Expected Return on Plan Assets(11.8) (11.6) (4.2) (4.5)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 0.2
 (3.2) (3.2)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss3.3
 3.3
 1.5
 1.3
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$4.4
 $4.9
 $(3.0) $(3.5)



SWEPCo
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Three Months Ended September 30, Three Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$2.1
 $2.0
 $0.2
 $0.2
Interest Cost3.1
 3.1
 0.9
 0.9
Expected Return on Plan Assets(4.2) (4.0) (1.5) (1.7)
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
 
 (1.3) (1.3)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss1.3
 1.2
 0.5
 0.5
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$2.3
 $2.3
 $(1.2) $(1.4)
 Pension Plans 
Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
 Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Service Cost$6.5
 $6.1
 $0.6
 $0.6
Interest Cost9.2
 9.3
 2.7
 2.7
Expected Return on Plan Assets(12.6) (12.3) (4.7) (5.0)
Amortization of Prior Service Cost (Credit)
 0.2
 (3.9) (3.9)
Amortization of Net Actuarial Loss3.7
 3.6
 1.7
 1.5
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Credit)$6.8
 $6.9
 $(3.6) $(4.1)


8.  BUSINESS SEGMENTS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


AEP’s Reportable Segments


AEP’s primary business is the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.  Within its Vertically Integrated Utilities segment, AEP centrally dispatches generation assets and manages its overall utility operations on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight.  Intersegment sales and transfers are generally based on underlying contractual arrangements and agreements.


AEP’s reportable segments and their related business activities are outlined below:


Vertically Integrated Utilities


Generation, transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by AEGCo, APCo, I&M, KGPCo, KPCo, PSO, SWEPCo and WPCo.


Transmission and Distribution Utilities


Transmission and distribution of electricity for sale to retail and wholesale customers through assets owned and operated by OPCoAEP Texas and AEP Texas.OPCo.
OPCo purchases energy and capacity to serve SSOstandard service offer customers and provides transmission and distribution services for all connected load.
With the merger of TCC and TNC into AEP Utilities, Inc. to form AEP Texas, the Transmission and Distribution segment now includes certain activities related to the former AEP Utilities, Inc. that had been included in Corporate and Other.


AEP Transmission Holdco


Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in AEPTCo. These investments have FERC-approved returns on equity.ROEs.
Development, construction and operation of transmission facilities through investments in AEP’s transmission-only joint ventures. These investments have PUCT-approved or FERC-approved returns on equity.ROEs.


Generation & Marketing


Competitive generation in ERCOTContracted renewable energy investments and PJM.management services.
Marketing, risk management and retail activities in ERCOT, MISO, PJM SPP and MISO.SPP.
Contracted renewable energy investments and management services.Competitive generation in PJM.


The remainder of AEP’s activities is presentedactivities are presented as Corporate and Other. While not considered a reportable segment, Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries, Parent’s guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense, and other nonallocated costs.

146



The tables below presentrepresent AEP’s reportable segment income statement information for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022 and reportable segment balance sheet information as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016. These amounts2022.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling AdjustmentsConsolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:      
External Customers$2,629.0 $1,330.8 $88.3 $318.2 $6.2 $— $4,372.5 
Other Operating Segments45.5 9.4 370.3 13.2 25.8 (464.2)— 
Total Revenues$2,674.5 $1,340.2 $458.6 $331.4 $32.0 $(464.2)$4,372.5 
Net Income (Loss)$278.4 $176.7 $197.3 $(38.6)$(97.7)$— $516.1 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
 Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling AdjustmentsConsolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:      
External Customers$2,595.0 $1,296.8 $79.1 $654.4 $14.4 $— $4,639.7 
Other Operating Segments53.5 4.8 299.7 5.2 10.1 (373.3)— 
Total Revenues$2,648.5 $1,301.6 $378.8 $659.6 $24.5 $(373.3)$4,639.7 
Net Income (Loss)$303.3 $164.8 $142.7 $65.9 $(155.9)$— $520.8 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling AdjustmentsConsolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:      
External Customers$5,445.3 $2,786.1 $178.4 $645.1 $8.5 $— $9,063.4 
Other Operating Segments87.0 18.3 735.7 13.3 53.6 (907.9)— 
Total Revenues$5,532.3 $2,804.4 $914.1 $658.4 $62.1 $(907.9)$9,063.4 
Net Income (Loss)$540.6 $302.4 $379.7 $(195.0)$(111.2)$— $916.5 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
 Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling AdjustmentsConsolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:      
External Customers$5,241.8 $2,539.0 $162.5 $1,263.9 $25.1 $— $9,232.3 
Other Operating Segments94.1 9.4 627.7 15.0 19.3 (765.5)— 
Total Revenues$5,335.9 $2,548.4 $790.2 $1,278.9 $44.4 $(765.5)$9,232.3 
Net Income (Loss)$602.5 $317.6 $316.4 $181.9 $(179.5)$— $1,238.9 




147



June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling
Adjustments
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Total Assets (d)$51,047.3 $23,900.0 $16,023.5 $4,457.9 $6,451.4 (b)$(5,878.0)(c)$96,002.1 
December 31, 2022
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration
&
Marketing
Corporate and Other (a)Reconciling
Adjustments
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Total Assets$49,761.8 $22,920.2 $15,215.8 $4,520.1 $6,768.4 (b)$(5,783.0)(c)$93,403.3 

(a)Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries. This segment also includes Parent’s guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income, interest expense and other nonallocated costs.
(b)Includes elimination of AEP Parent’s investments in wholly-owned subsidiary companies.
(c)Reconciling Adjustments for Total Assets primarily include certain estimateselimination of intercompany advances to affiliates and allocations where necessary.intercompany accounts receivable.
(d)Amount includes Assets Held for Sale on the balance sheet. See “Planned Disposition of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio” section of Note 6 for additional information.


148
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling Adjustments Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from: 
  
  
  
  
    
External Customers$2,453.8
 $1,149.7
 $45.1
 $441.5
 $14.6
 $
 $4,104.7
Other Operating Segments28.4
 23.6
 133.4
 24.0
 16.7
 (226.1) 
Total Revenues$2,482.2
 $1,173.3
 $178.5
 $465.5
 $31.3
 $(226.1) $4,104.7
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations$297.3
 $144.0
 $76.5
 $33.7
 $5.2
 $
 $556.7
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss)$297.3
 $144.0
 $76.5
 $33.7
 $5.2
 $
 $556.7
              
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling Adjustments Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from: 
  
  
  
  
    
External Customers$2,538.3
 $1,245.4
 $39.5
 $823.3
 $5.7
 $
 $4,652.2
Other Operating Segments18.0
 30.2
 92.9
 36.1
 19.1
 (196.3) 
Total Revenues$2,556.3
 $1,275.6
 $132.4
 $859.4
 $24.8
 $(196.3) $4,652.2
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations$343.4
 $155.7
 $69.5
 $(1,369.2) $36.4
 $
 $(764.2)
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss)$343.4
 $155.7
 $69.5
 $(1,369.2) $36.4
 $
 $(764.2)





 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling Adjustments Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from: 
  
  
  
  
    
External Customers$6,819.3
 $3,242.7
 $125.8
 $1,386.8
 $39.9
 $
 $11,614.5
Other Operating Segments73.8
 70.5
 456.1
 80.7
 46.8
 (727.9) 
Total Revenues$6,893.1
 $3,313.2
 $581.9
 $1,467.5
 $86.7
 $(727.9) $11,614.5
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations$639.2
 $374.3
 $278.3
 $246.3
 $(11.0) $
 $1,527.1
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income (Loss)$639.2
 $374.3
 $278.3
 $246.3
 $(11.0) $
 $1,527.1
              
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling Adjustments Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from: 
  
  
  
  
    
External Customers$6,864.6
 $3,398.9
 $110.1
 $2,192.5
 $23.9
 $
 $12,590.0
Other Operating Segments63.2
 69.6
 272.6
 98.7
 55.2
 (559.3) 
Total Revenues$6,927.8
 $3,468.5
 $382.7
 $2,291.2
 $79.1
 $(559.3) $12,590.0
              
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations$832.6
 $387.8
 $209.5
 $(1,248.8) $64.2
 $
 $245.3
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
 
 
 (2.5) 
 (2.5)
Net Income (Loss)$832.6
 $387.8
 $209.5
 $(1,248.8) $61.7
 $
 $242.8


  September 30, 2017
  Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling
Adjustments
 Consolidated
  (in millions)
Total Property, Plant and Equipment $42,722.9
 $15,695.2
 $6,394.2
 $632.9
 $359.5
 $(366.5)(b)$65,438.2
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 13,042.9
 3,766.2
 156.6
 161.7
 180.8
 (186.5)(b)17,121.7
Total Property Plant and Equipment - Net $29,680.0
 $11,929.0
 $6,237.6
 $471.2
 $178.7
 $(180.0)(b)$48,316.5
               
Total Assets $38,136.4
 $15,765.0
 $7,631.2
 $1,904.4
 $22,339.9
 $(21,812.0)(b) (c)$63,964.9
               
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year:              
Non-Affiliated $1,107.2
 $703.4
 $
 $0.1
 $548.6
 $
 $2,359.3
               
Long-term Debt:              
Affiliated 50.0
 
 
 32.2
 
 (82.2) 
Non-Affiliated 10,644.2
 4,738.0
 2,682.1
 (0.3) 298.4
 
 18,362.4
               
Total Long-term Debt $11,801.4
 $5,441.4
 $2,682.1
 $32.0
 $847.0
 $(82.2) $20,721.7
               
  December 31, 2016
  Vertically Integrated Utilities Transmission and Distribution Utilities AEP Transmission Holdco Generation
&
Marketing
 Corporate and Other (a) Reconciling
Adjustments
 Consolidated
  (in millions)
Total Property, Plant and Equipment $41,552.6
 $14,762.2
 $5,354.0
 $364.7
 $356.6
 $(353.5)(b)$62,036.6
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization 12,596.7
 3,655.0
 101.4
 42.2
 186.0
 (184.0)(b)16,397.3
Total Property Plant and Equipment - Net $28,955.9
 $11,107.2
 $5,252.6
 $322.5
 $170.6
 $(169.5)(b)$45,639.3
               
Assets Held for Sale $
 $
 $
 $1,951.2
 $
 $
 $1,951.2
               
Total Assets $37,428.3
 $14,802.4
 $6,384.8
 $3,386.1
 $20,354.8
 $(18,888.7)(b) (c)$63,467.7
               
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year:              
Non-Affiliated $1,519.9
 $309.4
 $
 $500.1
 $548.6
 $
 $2,878.0
               
Long-term Debt:              
Affiliated 20.0
 
 
 32.2
 
 (52.2) 
Non-Affiliated 10,353.3
 4,672.2
 2,055.7
 
 297.2
 
 17,378.4
               
Total Long-term Debt $11,893.2
 $4,981.6
 $2,055.7
 $532.3
 $845.8
 $(52.2) $20,256.4
               
Liabilities Held for Sale $
 $
 $
 $235.9
 $
 $
 $235.9

(a)Corporate and Other primarily includes the purchasing of receivables from certain AEP utility subsidiaries, Parent’s guarantee revenue received from affiliates, investment income, interest income and interest expense and other nonallocated costs.
(b)Includes eliminations due to an intercompany capital lease.
(c)Reconciling Adjustments for Total Assets primarily include the elimination of intercompany advances to affiliates and intercompany accounts receivable along with the elimination of AEP’s investments in subsidiary companies.


Registrant Subsidiaries’ Reportable Segments (Applies to APCo, I&M, OPCo, PSO and SWEPCo)all Registrant Subsidiaries except AEPTCo)


The Registrant Subsidiaries besides AEPTCo, each have one reportable segment, an integrated electricity generation, transmission and distribution business for APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo, and an integrated electricity transmission and distribution business for AEP Texas and OPCo.  Other activities are insignificant.  OperationsThe Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations are managed on an integrated basis because of the substantial impact of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures and operating results.


AEPTCo’s Reportable Segments


AEPTCo Parent is the holding company of seven FERC-regulated transmission-only electric utilities (State Transcos).utilities. The seven State Transcos have been identified as operating segments of AEPTCo under the accounting guidance for “Segment Reporting.” The State Transcos business consists of developing, constructing and operating transmission facilities at the request of the RTO’sRTOs in which they operate and in replacing and upgrading facilities, assets and components of the existing AEP transmission system as needed to maintain reliability standards and provide service to AEP’s wholesale and retail customers. The State Transcos are regulated for rate-making purposes exclusively by the FERC and earn revenues through tariff rates charged for the use of their electric transmission systems.


AEPTCo’s Chief Operating Decision Maker makes operating decisions, allocates resources to and assesses performance based on these operating segments. The seven State TranscoTranscos operating segments all have similar economic characteristics and meet all of the criteria under the accounting guidance for “Segment Reporting” to be aggregated into one operating segment. As a result, AEPTCo has one reportable segment. The remainder of AEPTCo’s activity is presented in AEPTCo Parent. While not considered a reportable segment, AEPTCo Parent represents the activity of the holding company which primarily relates to debt financing activity and general corporate activities.


The tables below present AEPTCo’s reportable segment income statement information for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 20162022 and reportable segment balance sheet information as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016. These amounts include certain estimates and allocations where necessary.2022.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Revenues from:
External Customers$87.4 $— $— $87.4 
Sales to AEP Affiliates357.5 — — 357.5 
Total Revenues$444.9 $— $— $444.9 
Net Income$174.2 $1.5 (a)$— $175.7 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Revenues from:
External Customers$77.3 $— $— $77.3 
Sales to AEP Affiliates287.1 — — 287.1 
Total Revenues$364.4 $— $— $364.4 
Net Income$118.4 $0.1 (a)$— $118.5 

149


Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo Consolidated
(in millions)
Revenues from:Revenues from:
External CustomersExternal Customers$176.4 $— $— $176.4 
Sales to AEP AffiliatesSales to AEP Affiliates710.1 — — 710.1 
Total RevenuesTotal Revenues$886.5 $— $— $886.5 
Net IncomeNet Income$335.8 $2.6 (a)$— $338.4 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments 
AEPTCo
Consolidated
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo Consolidated
(in millions)(in millions)
Revenues from:       Revenues from:
External Customers$35.9
 $
 $
 $35.9
External Customers$162.3 $— $— $162.3 
Sales to AEP Affiliates131.3
 
 0.1
 131.4
Sales to AEP Affiliates602.5 — — 602.5 
Total Revenues$167.2
 $
 $0.1
 $167.3
Total Revenues$764.8 $— $— $764.8 
       
Interest Income$
 $19.5
 $(19.3)(a)$0.2
Interest Expense16.9
 19.3
 (19.3)(a)16.9
Income Tax Expense30.2
 
 
 30.2
Equity Earnings in State Transcos
 59.8
 (59.8)(b)
       
Net Income$59.8
 $59.9
 $(59.8)(b)$59.9
Net Income$273.8 $0.1 (a)$— $273.9 
June 30, 2023
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Total Assets$14,626.3 $5,542.1 (b)$(5,591.9)(c)$14,576.5 
December 31, 2022
State TranscosAEPTCo ParentReconciling AdjustmentsAEPTCo
Consolidated
(in millions)
Total Assets$13,875.6 $4,817.4 (b)$(4,878.8)(c)$13,814.2 

(a)Includes the elimination of AEPTCo Parent’s equity earnings in the State Transcos.
(b)Primarily relates to Notes Receivable from the State Transcos.
(c)Primarily relates to the elimination of Notes Receivable from the State Transcos.


150
 Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments 
AEPTCo
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:       
External Customers$33.5
 $
 $
 $33.5
Sales to AEP Affiliates91.8
 
 
 91.8
Total Revenues$125.3
 $
 $
 $125.3
        
Interest Income$
 $14.0
 $(13.9)(a)$0.1
Interest Expense11.0
 13.9
 (13.9)(a)11.0
Income Tax Expense26.4
 
 
 26.4
Equity Earnings in State Transcos
 52.3
 (52.3)(b)
        
Net Income$52.3
 $52.4
 $(52.3)(b)$52.4




 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments 
AEPTCo
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:       
External Customers$99.2
 $
 $
 $99.2
Sales to AEP Affiliates450.2
 
 
 450.2
Total Revenues$549.4
 $
 $
 $549.4
        
Interest Income$0.1
 $58.0
 $(57.6)(a)$0.5
Interest Expense48.6
 57.6
 (57.6)(a)48.6
Income Tax Expense114.3
 0.2
 
 114.5
Equity Earnings in State Transcos
 224.0
 (224.0)(b)
        
Net Income$224.0
 $224.3
 $(224.0)(b)$224.3
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments 
AEPTCo
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Revenues from:       
External Customers$89.6
 $
 $
 $89.6
Sales to AEP Affiliates268.4
 
 
 268.4
Total Revenues$358.0
 $
 $
 $358.0
        
Interest Income$
 $41.8
 $(41.6)(a)$0.2
Interest Expense32.3
 41.6
 (41.6)(a)32.3
Income Tax Expense73.9
 
 
 73.9
Equity Earnings in State Transcos
 153.0
 (153.0)(b)
        
Net Income$153.0
 $153.0
 $(153.0)(b)$153.0
 September 30, 2017
 State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments AEPTCo
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Total Transmission Property$6,067.5
 $
 $
 $6,067.5
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization151.5
 
 
 151.5
Total Transmission Property – Net$5,916.0
 $
 $
 $5,916.0
        
Notes Receivable - Affiliated$
 $2,500.0
 $(2,500.0)(c)$
        
Total Assets$6,455.2
 $5,010.8
 $(4,917.1)(d)$6,548.9
        
Total Long-term Debt$2,475.6
 $2,574.4
 $(2,500.0)(c)$2,550.0
 December 31, 2016
 State Transcos AEPTCo Parent Reconciling Adjustments AEPTCo
Consolidated
 (in millions)
Total Transmission Property$5,054.2
 $
 $
 $5,054.2
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization99.6
 
 
 99.6
Total Transmission Property – Net$4,954.6
 $
 $
 $4,954.6
        
Notes Receivable - Affiliated$
 $1,950.0
 $(1,950.0)(c)$
        
Total Assets$5,337.5
 $3,947.8
 $(3,935.5)(d)$5,349.8
        
Total Long-term Debt$1,932.0
 $1,950.0
 $(1,950.0)(c)$1,932.0

(a)Elimination of intercompany interest income/interest expense on affiliated debt arrangement.
(b)Elimination of AEPTCo Parent’s equity earnings in the State Transcos.
(c)Elimination of intercompany debt.
(d)Primarily relates to the elimination of AEPTCo Parent’s investment in the State Transcos and Note Receivable from the State Transcos.



9.  DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise. For the periods presented, AEPTCo did not have any Derivativederivative and Hedginghedging activity.


OBJECTIVES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS


AEPSC is agent for and transacts on behalf of certain AEP subsidiaries, including the Registrant Subsidiaries. AEP Energy Partners, LLCAEPEP is agent for and transacts on behalf of other AEP subsidiaries.


The Registrants are exposed to certain market risks as major power producers and participants in the electricity, capacity, natural gas, coal and emission allowance markets.  These risks include commodity price risks which may be subject to capacity risk, interest rate risk credit risk and foreign currency exchangecredit risk.  These risks represent the risk of loss that may impact the Registrants due to changes in the underlying market prices or rates.  Management utilizes derivative instruments to manage these risks.


STRATEGIES FOR UTILIZATION OF DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS TO ACHIEVE OBJECTIVES


Risk Management Strategies


The strategy surrounding the use of derivative instruments primarily focuses on managing risk exposures, future cash flows and creating value utilizing both economic and formal hedging strategies. The risk management strategies also include the use of derivative instruments for trading purposes which focus on seizing market opportunities to create value driven by expected changes in the market prices of the commodities. To accomplish these objectives, the Registrants primarily employ risk management contracts including physical and financial forward purchase-and-sale contracts and, to a lesser extent, OTC swaps and options. Not all risk management contracts meet the definition of a derivative under the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.” Derivative risk management contracts elected normal under the normal purchases and normal sales scope exception are not subject to the requirements of this accounting guidance.


The Registrants utilize power, capacity, coal, natural gas, interest rate and, to a lesser extent, heating oil, gasoline and other commodity contracts to manage the risk associated with the energy business. The Registrants utilize interest rate derivative contracts in order to manage the interest rate exposure associated with the commodity portfolio. For disclosure purposes, such risks are grouped as “Commodity,” as these risks are related to energy risk management activities. The Registrants also utilize derivative contracts to manage interest rate risk associated with debt financing. For disclosure purposes, these risks are grouped as “Interest Rate.” The amount of risk taken is determined by the Commercial Operations, Energy Supply and Finance groups in accordance with established risk management policies as approved by the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors.



151



The following tables represent the gross notional volume of the Registrants’ outstanding derivative contracts:


Notional Volume of Derivative Instruments
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Primary Risk
Exposure
Unit of
Measure
AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Commodity:      
PowerMWhs269.9 — 29.1 9.2 2.3 8.7 6.9 
Natural GasMMBtus136.8 — 5.2 — — 28.3 7.3 
Heating Oil and GasolineGallons6.7 1.8 1.0 0.6 1.4 0.9 0.9 
Interest RateUSD$91.4 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Interest Rate on Long-term DebtUSD$950.0 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Primary Risk
Exposure
 
Unit of
Measure
 AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
    (in millions)
Commodity:        
  
  
  
Power MWhs 406.0
 73.7
 45.8
 10.6
 13.7
 34.5
Coal Tons 0.5
 
 0.2
 
 
 0.3
Natural Gas MMBtus 48.1
 2.0
 1.2
 
 
 18.3
Heating Oil and Gasoline Gallons 7.9
 1.5
 0.7
 1.8
 0.8
 0.9
Interest Rate USD $53.2
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
               
Interest Rate USD $1,000.0
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $

Notional Volume of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 20162022
Primary Risk
Exposure
Unit of
Measure
AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Commodity:      
PowerMWhs226.8 — 17.9 4.2 2.5 2.9 2.2 
Natural GasMMBtus77.1 — 1.9 — — 1.9 2.1 
Heating Oil and GasolineGallons6.9 1.9 1.0 0.7 1.4 0.9 1.0 
Interest RateUSD$99.9 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Interest Rate on Long-term DebtUSD$1,650.0 $— $— $— $— $200.0 $— 
Primary Risk
Exposure
 
Unit of
Measure
 AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
    (in millions)
Commodity:        
  
  
  
Power MWhs 348.0
 51.9
 19.9
 11.2
 11.9
 14.2
Coal Tons 1.5
 
 0.5
 
 
 1.0
Natural Gas MMBtus 32.8
 
 
 
 
 
Heating Oil and Gasoline Gallons 7.4
 1.4
 0.7
 1.6
 0.8
 0.9
Interest Rate USD $75.2
 $0.1
 $0.1
 $
 $
 $
               
Interest Rate USD $500.0
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $


Fair Value Hedging Strategies (Applies to AEP)


Parent enters into interest rate derivative transactions as part of an overall strategy to manage the mix of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt. Certain interest rate derivative transactions effectively modify exposure to interest rate risk by converting a portion of fixed-rate debt to a floating rate.floating-rate. Provided specific criteria are met, these interest rate derivatives may be designated as fair value hedges.


Cash Flow Hedging Strategies


The Registrants utilize cash flow hedges on certain derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of power (“Commodity”) in order to manage the variable price risk related to forecasted purchases and sales. Management monitors the potential impacts of commodity price changes and, where appropriate, enters into derivative transactions to protect profit margins for a portion of future electricity sales and purchases. The Registrants do not hedge all commodity price risk.


The Registrants utilize a variety of interest rate derivative transactions in order to manage interest rate risk exposure. The Registrants also utilize interest rate derivative contracts to manage interest rate exposure related to future borrowings of fixed-rate debt. The Registrants do not hedge all interest rate exposure.

152

At times, the Registrants are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks primarily when some fixed assets are purchased from foreign suppliers. In accordance with AEP’s risk management policy, the Registrants may utilize foreign currency derivative transactions to protect against the risk of increased cash outflows resulting from a foreign currency’s appreciation against the dollar. The Registrants do not hedge all foreign currency exposure.



ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND THE IMPACT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging” requires recognition of all qualifying derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheets at fair value. The fair values of derivative instruments accounted for using MTM accounting or hedge accounting are based on exchange prices and broker quotes. If a quoted market price is not available, the estimate of fair value is based on the best information available including valuation models that estimate future energy prices based on existing market and broker quotes supply and demand market data andother assumptions. In order to determine the relevant fair values of the derivative instruments, the Registrants apply valuation adjustments for discounting, liquidity and credit quality.


Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will fail to perform on the contract or fail to pay amounts due. Liquidity risk represents the risk that imperfections in the market will cause the price to vary from estimated fair value based upon prevailing market supply and demand conditions. Since energy markets are imperfect and volatile, there are inherent risks related to the underlying assumptions in models used to fair value risk management contracts. Unforeseen events may cause reasonable price curves to differ from actual price curves throughout a contract’s term and at the time a contract settles. Consequently, there could be significant adverse or favorable effects on future net income and cash flows if market prices are not consistent with management’s estimates of current market consensus for forward prices in the current period. This is particularly true for longer term contracts. Cash flows may vary based on market conditions, margin requirements and the timing of settlement of risk management contracts.


According to the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging,” the Registrants reflect the fair values of derivative instruments subject to netting agreements with the same counterparty net of related cash collateral. For certain risk management contracts, the Registrants are required to post or receive cash collateral based on third partythird-party contractual agreements and risk profiles. The RegistrantsAEP netted cash collateral received from third partiesthird-parties against short-term and long-term risk management assets in the amounts of $73 million and $481 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. AEP netted cash collateral paid to third partiesthird-parties against short-term and long-term risk management liabilities in the amounts of $35 million and $2 million as follows:of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. There was no cash collateral received from third-parties netted against short-term and long-term risk management assets for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The amount of cash collateral paid to third-parties netted against short-term and long-term risk management liabilities was immaterial for the Registrant Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
153

  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Cash Collateral Cash Collateral Cash Collateral Cash Collateral
  Received Paid Received Paid
  Netted Against Netted Against Netted Against Netted Against
  Risk Management Risk Management Risk Management Risk Management
Company Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
  (in millions)
AEP $3.5
 $17.0
 $7.9
 $7.6
APCo 0.4
 0.3
 0.5
 0.7
I&M 0.3
 0.1
 0.3
 0.4
OPCo 0.1
 
 0.2
 
PSO 
 
 0.1
 
SWEPCo 
 
 0.1
 



The following tables represent the gross fair value of the Registrants’ derivative activity on the balance sheets:sheets. Unless shown as a separate line on the balance sheets due to materiality, Current Risk Management Assets are included in Prepayments and Other Current Assets, Long-term Risk Management Assets are included in Deferred Charges and Other Noncurrent Assets, Current Risk Management Liabilities are included in Other Current Liabilities and Long-term Risk Management Liabilities are included in Deferred Credits and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the balance sheets.


AEP

June 30, 2023
Risk
Management
Contracts
Hedging ContractsGross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Commodity (a)Interest Rate (a)
 (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$721.6 $43.4 $— $765.0 $(485.5)$279.5 
Long-term Risk Management Assets466.4 95.1 — 561.5 (294.7)266.8 
Total Assets1,188.0 138.5 — 1,326.5 (780.2)546.3 
Current Risk Management Liabilities631.5 12.8 42.6 686.9 (510.7)176.2 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities418.5 6.7 82.1 507.3 (232.0)275.3 
Total Liabilities1,050.0 19.5 124.7 1,194.2 (742.7)451.5 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)$138.0 $119.0 $(124.7)$132.3 $(37.5)$94.8 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2022
Risk
Management
Contracts
Hedging ContractsGross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Commodity (a)Interest Rate (a)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$965.4 $212.2 $1.8 $1,179.4 $(830.6)$348.8 
Long-term Risk Management Assets565.6 148.9 14.3 728.8 (444.7)284.1 
Total Assets1,531.0 361.1 16.1 1,908.2 (1,275.3)632.9 
Current Risk Management Liabilities663.8 60.4 41.4 765.6 (620.4)145.2 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities412.0 17.4 91.1 520.5 (175.3)345.2 
Total Liabilities1,075.8 77.8 132.5 1,286.1 (795.7)490.4 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)$455.2 $283.3 $(116.4)$622.1 $(479.6)$142.5 

154


  
Risk
Management
Contracts
 Hedging Contracts 
Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 
Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 
Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Commodity (a) Interest Rate (a)   
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $277.4
 $8.1
 $4.2
 $289.7
 $(143.6) $146.1
Long-term Risk Management Assets 348.1
 3.8
 
 351.9
 (41.5) 310.4
Total Assets 625.5
 11.9
 4.2
 641.6
 (185.1) 456.5
             
Current Risk Management Liabilities 202.2
 13.5
 1.4
 217.1
 (147.7) 69.4
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 329.6
 74.0
 
 403.6
 (50.9) 352.7
Total Liabilities 531.8
 87.5
 1.4
 620.7
 (198.6) 422.1
             
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $93.7
 $(75.6) $2.8
 $20.9
 $13.5
 $34.4
             
             
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
             
  
Risk
Management
Contracts
 Hedging Contracts Gross Amounts
of Risk
Management
Assets/
Liabilities
Recognized
 Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (b)
 Net Amounts of
Assets/Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position (c)
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Commodity (a) Interest Rate (a)   
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $264.4
 $13.2
 $
 $277.6
 $(183.1) $94.5
Long-term Risk Management Assets 315.0
 7.7
 
 322.7
 (33.6) 289.1
Total Assets 579.4
 20.9
 
 600.3
 (216.7) 383.6
             
Current Risk Management Liabilities 227.2
 6.3
 
 233.5
 (180.1) 53.4
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 301.0
 50.1
 1.4
 352.5
 (36.3) 316.2
Total Liabilities 528.2
 56.4
 1.4
 586.0
 (216.4) 369.6
             
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $51.2
 $(35.5) $(1.4) $14.3
 $(0.3) $14.0
AEP Texas

June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$— $— $— 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets— — — 
Current Risk Management Liabilities0.4 (0.4)— 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities0.1 (0.1)— 
Total Liabilities0.5 (0.5)— 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)$(0.5)$0.5 $— 



APCo
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $50.4
 $(20.1) $30.3
Long-term Risk Management Assets 4.9
 (4.3) 0.6
Total Assets 55.3
 (24.4) 30.9
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 20.7
 (19.8) 0.9
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 4.8
 (4.5) 0.3
Total Liabilities 25.5
 (24.3) 1.2
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $29.8
 $(0.1) $29.7

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $22.7
 $(20.1) $2.6
Long-term Risk Management Assets 1.9
 (1.9) 
Total Assets 24.6
 (22.0) 2.6
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 20.6
 (20.3) 0.3
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 2.8
 (1.9) 0.9
Total Liabilities 23.4
 (22.2) 1.2
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets $1.2
 $0.2
 $1.4

I&M
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $27.4
 $(15.8) $11.6
Long-term Risk Management Assets 3.3
 (2.8) 0.5
Total Assets 30.7
 (18.6) 12.1
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 17.6
 (15.6) 2.0
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 3.0
 (2.8) 0.2
Total Liabilities 20.6
 (18.4) 2.2
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $10.1
 $(0.2) $9.9

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $14.9
 $(11.4) $3.5
Long-term Risk Management Assets 1.1
 (1.1) 
Total Assets 16.0
 (12.5) 3.5
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 11.8
 (11.5) 0.3
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 1.9
 (1.1) 0.8
Total Liabilities 13.7
 (12.6) 1.1
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets $2.3
 $0.1
 $2.4



OPCo
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $0.3
 $(0.1) $0.2
Long-term Risk Management Assets 
 
 
Total Assets 0.3
 (0.1) 0.2
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 7.6
 
 7.6
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 130.9
 
 130.9
Total Liabilities 138.5
 
 138.5
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Liabilities $(138.2) $(0.1) $(138.3)

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $0.4
 $(0.2) $0.2
Long-term Risk Management Assets 
 
 
Total Assets 0.4
 (0.2) 0.2
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 5.9
 
 5.9
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 113.1
 
 113.1
Total Liabilities 119.0
 
 119.0
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Liabilities $(118.6) $(0.2) $(118.8)

PSO
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $4.7
 $
 $4.7
Long-term Risk Management Assets 
 
 
Total Assets 4.7
 
 4.7
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Total Liabilities 
 
 
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets $4.7
 $
 $4.7

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $0.9
 $(0.1) $0.8
Long-term Risk Management Assets 
 
 
Total Assets 0.9
 (0.1) 0.8
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Total Liabilities 
 
 
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $0.9
 $(0.1) $0.8



SWEPCo
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
September 30, 2017
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $12.7
 $(0.2) $12.5
Long-term Risk Management Assets 0.7
 
 0.7
Total Assets 13.4
 (0.2) 13.2
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 0.3
 (0.2) 0.1
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Total Liabilities 0.3
 (0.2) 0.1
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets $13.1
 $
 $13.1

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
December 31, 2016
  Risk Management Gross Amounts Offset Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
  Contracts - in the Statement of Presented in the Statement
Balance Sheet Location Commodity (a) Financial Position (b) of Financial Position (c)
  (in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets $1.1
 $(0.2) $0.9
Long-term Risk Management Assets 
 
 
Total Assets 1.1
 (0.2) 0.9
       
Current Risk Management Liabilities 0.4
 (0.1) 0.3
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities 
 
 
Total Liabilities 0.4
 (0.1) 0.3
       
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities) $0.7
 $(0.1) $0.6

(a)Derivative instruments within these categories are reported gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented onDecember 31, 2022
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the balance sheets on a net basisStatement ofPresented in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$— $— $— 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets— — — 
(b)Current Risk Management LiabilitiesAmounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”— — — 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities— — — 
Total Liabilities— — — 
(c)Total MTM Derivative Contract Net AssetsThere are no derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement which are not offset in the statement of financial position.$— $— $— 




155


APCo
June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$42.5 $(3.3)$39.2 
Long-term Risk Management Assets0.6 (0.4)0.2 
Total Assets43.1 (3.7)39.4 
Current Risk Management Liabilities5.1 (4.0)1.1 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities0.4 (0.4)— 
Total Liabilities5.5 (4.4)1.1 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$37.6 $0.7 $38.3 

December 31, 2022
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$69.3 $(0.2)$69.1 
Long-term Risk Management Assets0.7 (0.7)— 
Total Assets70.0 (0.9)69.1 
Current Risk Management Liabilities4.1 (0.5)3.6 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities0.7 (0.6)0.1 
Total Liabilities4.8 (1.1)3.7 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$65.2 $0.2 $65.4 
156


I&M
June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$22.3 $(0.9)$21.4 
Long-term Risk Management Assets11.8 (2.7)9.1 
Total Assets34.1 (3.6)30.5 
Current Risk Management Liabilities2.8 (1.4)1.4 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities2.7 (2.7)— 
Total Liabilities5.5 (4.1)1.4 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$28.6 $0.5 $29.1 

December 31, 2022
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$16.0 $(0.8)$15.2 
Long-term Risk Management Assets0.5 (0.3)0.2 
Total Assets16.5 (1.1)15.4 
Current Risk Management Liabilities0.9 (0.9)— 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities0.3 (0.3)— 
Total Liabilities1.2 (1.2)— 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$15.3 $0.1 $15.4 


157


OPCo
June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$— $— $— 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets— — — 
Current Risk Management Liabilities6.6 (0.3)6.3 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities47.8 (0.1)47.7 
Total Liabilities54.4 (0.4)54.0 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)$(54.4)$0.4 $(54.0)

December 31, 2022
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$— $— $— 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets— — — 
Current Risk Management Liabilities2.1 (0.3)1.8 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities37.9 — 37.9 
Total Liabilities40.0 (0.3)39.7 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets (Liabilities)$(40.0)$0.3 $(39.7)
158


PSO
June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$47.4 $(2.6)$44.8 
Long-term Risk Management Assets0.2 (0.2)— 
Total Assets47.6 (2.8)44.8 
Current Risk Management Liabilities5.4 (2.8)2.6 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities1.0 (0.2)0.8 
Total Liabilities6.4 (3.0)3.4 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$41.2 $0.2 $41.4 

December 31, 2022
Risk Management Contracts –Hedging ContractsGross Amounts of Risk Management Assets/Liabilities RecognizedGross Amounts Offset in the Statement of Financial Position (b)Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position (c)
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Interest Rate (a)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$24.1 $1.6 $25.7 $(0.4)$25.3 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — — — 
Total Assets24.1 1.6 25.7 (0.4)25.3 
Current Risk Management Liabilities2.1 — 2.1 (0.5)1.6 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities— — — — — 
Total Liabilities2.1 — 2.1 (0.5)1.6 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$22.0 $1.6 $23.6 $0.1 $23.7 


159


SWEPCo
June 30, 2023
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$28.5 $(0.5)$28.0 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets28.5 (0.5)28.0 
Current Risk Management Liabilities2.4 (0.8)1.6 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities0.2 — 0.2 
Total Liabilities2.6 (0.8)1.8 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$25.9 $0.3 $26.2 

December 31, 2022
Risk ManagementGross Amounts OffsetNet Amounts of Assets/Liabilities
Contracts –in the Statement ofPresented in the Statement of
Balance Sheet LocationCommodity (a)Financial Position (b)Financial Position (c)
(in millions)
Current Risk Management Assets$16.8 $(0.4)$16.4 
Long-term Risk Management Assets— — — 
Total Assets16.8 (0.4)16.4 
Current Risk Management Liabilities2.0 (0.6)1.4 
Long-term Risk Management Liabilities— — — 
Total Liabilities2.0 (0.6)1.4 
Total MTM Derivative Contract Net Assets$14.8 $0.2 $15.0 

(a)Derivative instruments within these categories are disclosed as gross.  These instruments are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the balance sheets on a net basis in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”
(b)Amounts include counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.”
(c)All derivative contracts subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement are offset in the statement of financial position.
160


The tables below present the Registrants’ activityamount of derivativegain (loss) recognized on risk management contracts:


Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
For
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
Location of Gain (Loss)AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues$17.0 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Generation & Marketing Revenues(141.8)— — — — — — 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues— — — 17.0 — — — 
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation1.3 — 1.3 0.1 — — — 
Other Operation(0.1)— — — — — — 
Maintenance(0.3)(0.1)— — — — — 
Regulatory Assets (a)(12.4)(0.1)5.9 (1.6)(12.8)(2.3)(0.9)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)102.0 — 17.4 3.6 — 42.4 33.6 
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts$(34.3)$(0.2)$24.6 $19.1 $(12.8)$40.1 $32.7 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
Location of Gain (Loss)AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues$0.1 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Generation & Marketing Revenues121.0 — — — — — — 
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation0.9 — 0.7 — — 0.1 — 
Other Operation1.7 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 
Maintenance2.4 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 
Regulatory Assets (a)21.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 21.0 — (0.1)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)110.4 — 21.6 1.5 1.6 39.0 36.9 
Total Gain on Risk Management Contracts$257.9 $1.3 $23.0 $2.2 $23.3 $39.6 $37.5 

161


Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
Location of Gain (Loss)AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues$11.7 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Generation & Marketing Revenues(289.2)— — — — — — 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues— — — 11.7 — — — 
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation2.0 — 1.9 0.1 — — — 
Other Operation(0.1)— — — — — — 
Maintenance(0.2)(0.1)— — — — — 
Regulatory Assets (a)(37.2)(0.5)(1.2)(2.1)(25.1)(3.5)(2.4)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)100.5 — (8.8)4.8 — 60.4 45.5 
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts$(212.5)$(0.6)$(8.1)$14.5 $(25.1)$56.9 $43.1 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
Location of Gain (Loss)AEPAEP TexasAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues$0.1 $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Generation & Marketing Revenues273.3 — — — — — — 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues— — 0.1 (0.1)— — — 
Purchased Electricity, Fuel and Other Consumables Used for Electric Generation2.4 — 2.1 — — 0.1 — 
Other Operation2.3 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 
Maintenance3.2 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 
Regulatory Assets (a)45.0 0.1 — (1.3)44.9 3.6 (2.2)
Regulatory Liabilities (a)146.9 0.9 20.2 3.2 1.6 51.7 57.8 
Total Gain on Risk Management Contracts$473.2 $2.6 $23.1 $2.4 $47.4 $56.1 $56.5 
(a)Represents realized and unrealized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017balance sheets.
Location of Gain (Loss) AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues $0.9
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Generation & Marketing Revenues 17.7
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues 
 0.3
 0.6
 
 
 (0.1)
Purchased Electricity for Resale 1.0
 0.3
 0.2
 
 
 
Other Operation 0.1
 
 
 0.1
 
 
Maintenance 0.1
 0.1
 
 0.1
 
 
Regulatory Assets (a) (8.8) 0.1
 (0.8) (8.7) 
 0.3
Regulatory Liabilities (a) 15.6
 3.7
 2.1
 
 2.6
 7.0
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts $26.6
 $4.5
 $2.1
 $(8.5) $2.6
 $7.2

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Location of Gain (Loss) AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues $2.4
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Transmission and Distribution Utilities Revenues 0.1
 
 
 
 
 
Generation & Marketing Revenues 9.2
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues 
 1.0
 1.2
 0.1
 
 (0.1)
Purchased Electricity for Resale 1.5
 0.8
 0.1
 
 
 
Other Operation (0.4) 
 
 (0.1) 
 
Maintenance (0.4) (0.1) 
 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)
Regulatory Assets (a) (22.5) 5.2
 1.6
 (95.4) 0.1
 2.8
Regulatory Liabilities (a) 28.6
 16.9
 5.5
 
 0.8
 3.7
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts $18.5
 $23.8
 $8.4
 $(95.5) $0.8
 $6.3



Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Location of Gain (Loss) AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues $7.0
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Generation & Marketing Revenues 38.5
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues 
 0.6
 6.3
 
 
 
Purchased Electricity for Resale 4.9
 1.6
 0.5
 
 
 
Other Operation 0.5
 
 
 0.1
 
 
Maintenance 0.4
 0.1
 
 0.1
 
 
Regulatory Assets (a) (26.8) 
 (1.0) (25.9) 
 0.1
Regulatory Liabilities (a) 81.8
 28.2
 15.3
 
 13.7
 22.0
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts $106.3
 $30.5
 $21.1
 $(25.7) $13.7
 $22.1

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on
Risk Management Contracts
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Location of Gain (Loss) AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Vertically Integrated Utilities Revenues $3.1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Transmission and Distribution Utilities Revenues 0.1
 
 
 
 
 
Generation & Marketing Revenues 50.1
 
 
 
 
 
Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution Revenues 
 (0.8) 3.7
 0.1
 
 (0.1)
Sales to AEP Affiliates 
 2.1
 5.8
 
 
 
Purchased Electricity for Resale 4.9
 2.7
 0.2
 
 
 
Other Operation (1.3) (0.1) (0.1) (0.3) (0.1) (0.2)
Maintenance (1.6) (0.3) (0.1) (0.3) (0.2) (0.2)
Regulatory Assets (a) (51.0) (7.2) 3.0
 (115.9) 0.4
 5.5
Regulatory Liabilities (a) 58.0
 39.2
 11.2
 (15.2) 3.2
 14.7
Total Gain (Loss) on Risk Management Contracts $62.3
 $35.6
 $23.7
 $(131.6) $3.3
 $19.7

(a)Represents realized and unrealized gains and losses subject to regulatory accounting treatment recorded as either current or noncurrent on the balance sheets.


Certain qualifying derivative instruments have been designated as normal purchase or normal sale contracts, as provided in the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.” Derivative contracts that have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales under that accounting guidance are not subject to MTM accounting treatment and are recognized on the statements of income on an accrual basis.


The accounting for the changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it qualifies for and has been designated as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. Depending on the exposure, management designates a hedging instrument as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge.


For contracts that have not been designated as part of a hedging relationship, the accounting for changes in fair value depends on whether the derivative instrument is held for trading purposes. Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments held for trading purposes are included in revenues on a net basis on the statements of income. Unrealized and realized gains and losses on derivative instruments not held for trading purposes are included in revenues or expenses on the statements of income depending on the relevant facts and circumstances. Certain derivatives that economically hedge future commodity risk are recorded in the same expense line item on the statements of income as that of the associated risk.risk being hedged. However, unrealized and some realized gains and losses in regulated jurisdictions for both trading and non-trading derivative instruments are recorded as regulatory assets (for losses) or regulatory liabilities (for gains) in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Regulated Operations.”




162


Accounting for Fair Value Hedging Strategies (Applies to AEP)


For fair value hedges (i.e. hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or an identified portion thereof attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item associated with the hedged risk impacts Net Incomenet income during the period of change.


AEP records realized and unrealized gains or losses on interest rate swaps that are designated and qualify for fair value hedge accounting treatment and any offsetting changes in the fair value of the debt being hedged in Interest Expense on the statements of income.

The following table shows the resultsimpacts recognized on the balance sheets related to the hedged items in fair value hedging relationships:
Carrying Amount of the Hedged LiabilitiesCumulative Amount of Fair Value Hedging Adjustment Included in the Carrying Amount of the Hedged Liabilities
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
(in millions)
Long-term Debt (a) (b)$(855.1)$(855.5)$90.8 $89.7 

(a)Amounts included on the Balance Sheet within Noncurrent Liabilities line item Long-term Debt.
(b)Amounts include $(34) million and $(38) million as of hedging gains (losses):June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, for the fair value hedge adjustment of hedged debt obligations for which hedge accounting has been discontinued.

 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Gain (Loss) on Fair Value Hedging Instruments$0.1
 $(1.1) $(0.1) $3.0
Gain (Loss) on Fair Value Portion of Long-term Debt(0.1) 1.1
 0.1
 (3.0)
The pretax effects of fair value hedge accounting on income were as follows:


During
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2023202220232022
(in millions)
Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Contracts:
Fair Value Hedging Instruments (a)$(4.2)$(17.6)$2.7 $(62.4)
Fair Value Portion of Long-term Debt (a)4.2 17.6 (2.7)62.4 

(a)Gain (Loss) is included in Interest Expense on the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial.statements of income.


Accounting for Cash Flow Hedging Strategies (Applies to AEP, AEP Texas, APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo)


For cash flow hedges (i.e. hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the Registrants initially report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument as a component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets until the period the hedged item affects Net Income. The Registrants recognize any hedge ineffectiveness in Net Income immediately during the period of change, except in regulated jurisdictions where hedge ineffectiveness would be recorded as a regulatory asset (for losses) or a regulatory liability (for gains) if applicable.net income.


Realized gains and losses on derivative contracts for the purchase and sale of power designated as cash flow hedges are included in Total Revenues or Purchased Electricity for Resale on the statements of income or in Regulatory Assets or Regulatory Liabilities on the balance sheets, depending on the specific nature of the risk being hedged. During the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and 2016,2022, AEP applied cash flow hedging to outstanding power derivatives. During the threederivatives and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Registrant Subsidiaries did not apply cash flow hedging to outstanding power derivatives.not.


The Registrants reclassify gains and losses on interest rate derivative hedges related to debt financings from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Interest Expense on the statements of income in those periods in which hedged interest payments occur. During the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023, AEP and 2016,AEP Texas applied cash flow hedging to outstanding interest rate derivatives and the other Registrant Subsidiaries did not. During the six months ended June 30, 2023, AEP, AEP Texas, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo applied cash flow hedging to outstanding interest rate derivatives and the other Registrant Subsidiaries did not. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, AEP applied cash flow hedging to outstanding interest rate derivatives. During the threederivatives and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Registrant Subsidiaries did not apply cash flow hedging to outstanding interest rate derivatives.not.

163

The accumulated gains or losses related to foreign currency hedges are reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets into Depreciation and Amortization expense on the statements of income over the depreciable lives of the fixed assets designated as the hedged items in qualifying foreign currency hedging relationships. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Registrants did not apply cash flow hedging to any outstanding foreign currency derivatives.


During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, hedge ineffectiveness was immaterial or nonexistent for all of the hedge strategies disclosed above.

For details on effective cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets and the reasons for changes in cash flow hedges, see Note 3.3 - Comprehensive Income.




Cash flow hedges included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) on the balance sheets were:


Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on AEP’s Balance Sheets
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
CommodityInterest RateCommodityInterest Rate
(in millions)
AOCI Gain Net of Tax$93.5 $12.7 $223.5 $0.3 
Portion Expected to be Reclassed to Net Income During the Next Twelve Months24.1 4.3 119.9 0.3 
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Commodity Interest Rate Commodity Interest Rate
  (in millions)
Hedging Assets (a) $4.3
 $4.2
 $11.2
 $
Hedging Liabilities (a) 79.9
 
 46.7
 
AOCI Gain (Loss) Net of Tax (49.2) (12.2) (23.1) (15.7)
Portion Expected to be Reclassified to Net Income During the Next Twelve Months (3.6) (0.7) 4.3
 (1.0)

(a)Hedging Assets and Hedging Liabilities are included in Risk Management Assets and Liabilities on the balance sheets.


As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 the maximum length of time that AEP is hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows related to forecasted transactions is 123 months.93 months and 90 months for commodity and interest rate hedges, respectively.


Impact of Cash Flow Hedges on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ Balance Sheets
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
Interest Rate
Expected to beExpected to be
Reclassified toReclassified to
Net Income DuringNet Income During
AOCI Gain (Loss)the NextAOCI Gain (Loss)the Next
CompanyNet of TaxTwelve MonthsNet of TaxTwelve Months
(in millions)
AEP Texas$2.9 $0.3 $(0.3)$(0.2)
APCo6.3 0.8 6.7 0.8 
I&M(5.7)(0.4)(5.1)(0.6)
PSO(0.2)— 1.3 0.1 
SWEPCo1.4 0.3 1.1 0.2 
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  Interest Rate
    Expected to be   Expected to be
    Reclassified to   Reclassified to
    Net Income During   Net Income During
  AOCI Gain (Loss) the Next AOCI Gain (Loss) the Next
Company Net of Tax Twelve Months Net of Tax Twelve Months
  (in millions)
APCo $2.4
 $0.7
 $2.9
 $0.7
I&M (11.0) (1.3) (12.0) (1.3)
OPCo 2.2
 1.1
 3.0
 1.1
PSO 2.8
 0.8
 3.4
 0.8
SWEPCo (6.3) (1.4) (7.4) (1.4)


The actual amounts reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) to Net Income can differ from the estimate above due to market price changes.


Credit Risk


Management mitigates credit risk in wholesale marketing and trading activities by assessing the creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing to evaluate their creditworthiness on an ongoing basis. Management uses Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s,credit agency ratings and current market-based qualitative and quantitative data as well as financial statements to assess the financial health of counterparties on an ongoing basis.


Master agreements are typically used to facilitate the netting of cash flows associated with a single counterparty and may include collateral requirements. Collateral requirements in the form of cash, letters of credit and parental/affiliate guarantees may be obtained as security from counterparties in order to mitigate credit risk. Some master agreements include margining, which requires a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit in the event exposure exceeds the established threshold. A counterparty is required to post cash or letters of credit in the event exposure exceeds the established threshold. The threshold represents an unsecured credit limit which may be supported by a parental/affiliate guaranty, as determined in accordance with AEP’s credit policy. In addition, master agreements allow for termination and liquidation of all positions in the event of a default including a failure or inability to post collateral when required.





164


Collateral Triggering EventsCredit-Risk-Related Contingent Features


Credit Downgrade Triggers (Applies to AEP, APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCo)


A limited number of derivative contracts include collateral triggering events, which include a requirement to maintain certain credit ratings.  On an ongoing basis, AEP’s risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these collateral triggering events in contracts.  AEP, APCo, I&M, PSO and SWEPCoThe Registrants have not experienced a downgrade below a specified credit rating threshold that would require the posting of additional collateral.  AEP had derivative contracts with collateral triggering events in a net liability position with a total exposure of $0 and $2 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. The RegistrantsRegistrant Subsidiaries had immaterialno derivative contracts with collateral triggering events in a net liability position as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016.2022.


Cross-Acceleration Triggers

Certain interest rate derivative contracts contain cross-acceleration provisions that, if triggered, would permit the counterparty to declare a default and require settlement of the outstanding payable. These cross-acceleration provisions could be triggered if there was a non-performance event by the Registrants under any of their outstanding debt of at least $50 million and the lender on that debt has accelerated the entire repayment obligation. On an ongoing basis, AEP’s risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these cross-acceleration provisions in contracts. AEP had derivative contracts with cross-acceleration provisions in a net liability position of $125 million and $127 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. There was no cash collateral posted as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. If a cross-acceleration provision would have been triggered, settlement at fair value would have been required. The Registrant Subsidiaries had no derivative contracts with cross-acceleration provisions outstanding as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Cross-Default Triggers (Applies to AEP, APCo, I&M, PSO and I&M)SWEPCo)


In addition, a majority of non-exchange traded commodity contracts contain cross-default provisions that, if triggered, would permit the counterparty to declare a default and require settlement of the outstanding payable. These cross-default provisions could be triggered if there was a non-performance event by Parent or the obligor under outstanding debt or a third partythird-party obligation that is $50 million or greater.  On an ongoing basis, AEP’s risk management organization assesses the appropriateness of these cross-default provisions in the contracts. The following tables represent: (a) the fair value of theseAEP had derivative liabilities subject to cross-default provisions prior to considerationin a net liability position of $178 million and $217 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, after considering contractual netting arrangements, (b) the amount that the exposure has been reduced byarrangements. There was no cash collateral posted as of June 30, 2023 and (c) ifDecember 31, 2022. If a cross-default provision would have been triggered, the settlement amount thatat fair value would be required after considering contractual netting arrangements:have been required. The Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative contracts with cross-default provisions outstanding as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were not material.
165
  September 30, 2017
  Liabilities for   Additional
  Contracts with Cross   Settlement
  Default Provisions   Liability if Cross
  Prior to Contractual Amount of Cash Default Provision
Company Netting Arrangements Collateral Posted is Triggered
  (in millions)
AEP $285.9
 $2.5
 $274.4
APCo 
 
 
I&M 
 
 


  December 31, 2016
  Liabilities for   Additional
  Contracts with Cross   Settlement
  Default Provisions   Liability if Cross
  Prior to Contractual Amount of Cash Default Provision
Company Netting Arrangements Collateral Posted is Triggered
  (in millions)
AEP $259.6
 $0.4
 $235.8
APCo 0.1
 
 
I&M 0.1
 
 


10.  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants except AEPTCo unless indicated otherwise.


Fair Value Hierarchy and Valuation Techniques


The accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).  Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized in Level 2.  When quoted market prices are not available, pricing may be completed using comparable securities, dealer values, operating data and general market conditions to determine fair value.  Valuation models utilize various inputs such as commodity, interest rate and, to a lesser degree, volatility and credit that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, market corroborated inputs (i.e. inputs derived principally from, or correlated to, observable market data) and other observable inputs for the asset or liability.


For commercial activities, exchange tradedexchange-traded derivatives, namely futures contracts, are generally fair valued based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1.  Level 2 inputs primarily consist of OTC broker quotes in moderately active or less active markets, as well as exchange traded contractsexchange-traded derivatives where there is insufficient market liquidity to warrant inclusion in Level 1.  Management verifies price curves using these broker quotes and classifies these fair values within Level 2 when substantially all of the fair value can be corroborated.  Management typically obtains multiple broker quotes, which are nonbinding in nature but are based on recent trades in the marketplace.  When multiple broker quotes are obtained, the quoted bid and ask prices are averaged.  In certain circumstances, a broker quote may be discarded if it is a clear outlier.  Management uses a historical correlation analysis between the broker quoted location and the illiquid locations.  If the points are highly correlated, these locations are included within Level 2 as well.  Certain OTC and bilaterally executed derivative instruments are executed in less active markets with a lower availability of pricing information.  Illiquid transactions, complex structured transactions, FTRs and counterparty credit risk may require nonmarket basednonmarket-based inputs.  Some of these inputs may be internally developed or extrapolated and utilized to estimate fair value.  When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized as Level 3.  The main driver of contracts being classified as Level 3 is the inability to substantiate energy price curves in the market.  A portion of the Level 3 instruments have been economically hedged which limits potential earnings volatility.


AEP utilizes its trustee’s external pricing service to estimate the fair value of the underlying investments held in the nuclear trusts.  AEP’s investment managers review and validate the prices utilized by the trustee to determine fair value.  AEP’s management performs its own valuation testing to verify the fair values of the securities.  AEP receives audit reports of the trustee’s operating controls and valuation processes.  The trustee uses multiple pricing vendors for the assets held in the trusts.


Assets in the nuclear trusts, cash and cash equivalents, other temporary investments and restricted cash for securitized funding are classified using the following methods.  Equities are classified as Level 1 holdings if they are actively traded on exchanges.  Items classified as Level 1 are investments in money market funds, fixed income and equity mutual funds and domestic equity securities.  They are valued based on observable inputs, primarily unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.  Items classified as Level 2 are primarily investments in individual fixed income securities and cash equivalent funds.securities.  Fixed income securities generally do not trade on exchanges and do not have an official closing price but their valuation inputs are based on observable market data.  Pricing vendors calculate bond valuations using financial models and matrices.  The models use observable inputs including yields on benchmark securities, quotes by securities brokers, rating agency actions, discounts or premiums on securities compared to par prices, changes in yields for U.S. Treasury securities, corporate actions by bond issuers, prepayment schedules and histories, economic events and, for certain securities, adjustments to yields to reflect changes in the rate of inflation.  Other securities with model-derived valuation inputs that are observable are also classified as Level 2 investments.  Investments with unobservable valuation inputs are classified as Level 3 investments.

166



Fair Value Measurements of Long-term Debt (Applies to all Registrants)


The fair values of Long-term Debt are based on quoted market prices, without credit enhancements, for the same or similar issues and the current interest rates offered for instruments with similar maturities classified as Level 2 measurement inputs.  These instruments are not marked-to-market.  The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The fair value of AEP’s Equity Units (Level 1) are valued based on publicly traded securities issued by AEP.


The book values and fair values of Long-term Debt are summarized in the following table:
June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
CompanyBook ValueFair ValueBook ValueFair Value
(in millions)
AEP (a)$40,142.3 $36,351.3 $36,801.0 $32,915.9 
AEP Texas5,937.5 5,295.5 5,657.8 5,045.8 
AEPTCo5,473.0 4,719.2 4,782.8 3,940.5 
APCo5,599.7 5,298.4 5,410.5 5,079.2 
I&M3,464.1 3,174.2 3,260.8 2,929.0 
OPCo3,365.6 2,878.8 2,970.3 2,516.6 
PSO2,383.9 2,106.1 1,912.8 1,635.8 
SWEPCo3,645.6 3,135.3 3,391.6 2,870.9 
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
Company Book Value Fair Value Book Value  Fair Value 
  (in millions) 
AEP $20,721.7
 $22,988.8
 $20,391.2
(a) $22,211.9
(a)
AEPTCo 2,550.0
 2,720.8
 1,932.0
  1,984.3
 
APCo 3,979.3
 4,721.3
 4,033.9
  4,613.2
 
I&M 2,658.5
 2,898.7
 2,471.4
  2,661.6
 
OPCo 1,718.9
 2,068.9
 1,763.9
  2,092.5
 
PSO 1,286.4
 1,448.0
 1,286.0
  1,419.0
 
SWEPCo 2,441.5
 2,620.7
 2,679.1
  2,814.3
 


(a)The fair value amounts include debt related to AEP’s Equity Units and had a fair value of $844 million and $877 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. See “Equity Units” section of Note 12 for additional information.
(a)Amounts include debt related to the Lawrenceburg Plant that has been classified as Liabilities Held for Sale on the balance sheet and has a fair value of $172 million. See the Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale section of Note 6 for additional information.


Fair Value Measurements of Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash (Applies to AEP)


Other Temporary Investments include funds held by trustees primarily for the payment of securitization bonds and securities available for sale, including marketable securities that management intends to hold for less than one year and investments by AEP’s protected cell of EIS.


The following is a summary of Other Temporary Investments:Investments and Restricted Cash:
June 30, 2023
GrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedFair
Other Temporary Investments and Restricted CashCostGainsLossesValue
(in millions)
Restricted Cash (a)$45.8 $— $— $45.8 
Other Cash Deposits15.9 — — 15.9 
Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds (b)155.7 — (8.9)146.8 
Equity Securities – Mutual Funds15.4 24.4 — 39.8 
Total Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash$232.8 $24.4 $(8.9)$248.3 
167


December 31, 2022
 September 30, 2017GrossGross
   Gross Gross  UnrealizedUnrealizedFair
   Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Other Temporary Investments Cost Gains Losses Value
Other Temporary Investments and Restricted CashOther Temporary Investments and Restricted CashCostGainsLossesValue
 (in millions)(in millions)
Restricted Cash (a) $172.9
 $
 $
 $172.9
Restricted Cash (a)$47.1 $— $— $47.1 
Other Cash DepositsOther Cash Deposits9.0 — — 9.0 
Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds (b) 103.9
 
 (0.7) 103.2
Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds (b)152.4 — (8.3)144.1 
Equity Securities Mutual Funds
 16.8
 17.8
 
 34.6
Equity Securities – Mutual Funds15.1 19.4 — 34.5 
Total Other Temporary Investments $293.6
 $17.8
 $(0.7) $310.7
Total Other Temporary Investments and Restricted CashTotal Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash$223.6 $19.4 $(8.3)$234.7 

  December 31, 2016
    Gross Gross  
    Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Other Temporary Investments Cost Gains Losses Value
  (in millions)
Restricted Cash (a) $211.7
 $
 $
 $211.7
Fixed Income Securities  Mutual Funds (b)
 92.7
 
 (1.0) 91.7
Equity Securities  Mutual Funds
 14.4
 13.9
 
 28.3
Total Other Temporary Investments $318.8
 $13.9
 $(1.0) $331.7
(a)Primarily represents amounts held for the repayment of debt.

(a)Primarily represents amounts held for the repayment of debt.
(b)Primarily short and intermediate maturities which may be sold and do not contain maturity dates.

(b)Primarily short and intermediate maturities which may be sold and do not contain maturity dates.



The following table provides the activity for fixed income and equity securities within Other Temporary Investments:
 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
 2023202220232022
(in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales$— $11.1 $— $15.0 
Purchases of Investments1.3 0.8 2.3 1.6 
Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales— 3.3 — 3.6 
Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales— 0.4 — 0.5 
 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales$
 $
 $
 $
Purchases of Investments12.6
 0.6
 13.6
 1.6
Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales
 
 
 
Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales
 
 
 

For details of the reasons for changes in Securities Available for Sale included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, see Note 3.


Fair Value Measurements of Trust Assets for Decommissioning and SNF Disposal (Applies to AEP and I&M)


Nuclear decommissioning and spent nuclear fuelSNF trust funds represent funds that regulatory commissions allow I&M to collect through rates to fund future decommissioning and spent nuclear fuelSNF disposal liabilities.  By rules or orders, the IURC, the MPSC and the FERC established investment limitations and general risk management guidelines.  In general, limitations include:


Acceptable investments (rated investment grade or above when purchased).
Maximum percentage invested in a specific type of investment.
Prohibition of investment in obligations of AEP, I&M or their affiliates.
Withdrawals permitted only for payment of decommissioning costs and trust expenses.


I&M maintains trust funds for each regulatory jurisdiction.  Regulatory approval is required to withdraw decommissioning funds.  These funds are managed by an external investment managers whomanager that must comply with the guidelines and rules of the applicable regulatory authorities. The trust assets are invested to optimize the net of tax earnings of the trust giving consideration to liquidity, risk, diversification and other prudent investment objectives.


I&M records securities held in these trust funds in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on its balance sheets.  I&M records these securities at fair value.  I&M classifies debt securities in the trust funds as available-for-sale due to their long-term purpose.

Other-than-temporary impairments for investments in both debt and equity securities are considered realized losses as a result of securities being managed by an external investment management firm.  The external investment management firm makes specific investment decisions regarding the debt and equity investments held in these trusts and generally intends to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position as part of a tax optimization strategy.  Impairments
168


reduce the cost basis of the securities which will affect any future unrealized gain or realized gain or loss due to the adjusted cost of investment.  I&M records unrealized gains, unrealized losses and other-than-temporary impairments from securities in these trust funds as adjustments to the regulatory liability account for the nuclear decommissioning trust funds and to regulatory assets or liabilities for the SNF disposal trust funds in accordance with their treatment in rates.  Consequently, changes in fair value of trust assets do not affect earnings or AOCI.


The following is a summary of nuclear trust fund investments:
 June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
GrossGrossOther-Than-GrossGrossOther-Than-
FairUnrealizedUnrealizedTemporaryFairUnrealizedUnrealizedTemporary
ValueGainsLossesImpairmentsValueGainsLossesImpairments
(in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents$24.2 $— $— $— $21.2 $— $— $— 
Fixed Income Securities:
United States Government1,191.9 9.9 (13.8)(25.6)1,123.8 11.8 (14.9)(18.8)
Corporate Debt68.8 0.8 (6.6)(1.7)61.6 0.7 (7.7)(9.6)
State and Local Government3.3 — — — 3.3 0.1 — (0.1)
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities1,264.0 10.7 (20.4)(27.3)1,188.7 12.6 (22.6)(28.5)
Equity Securities - Domestic2,360.6 1,725.7 (4.6)— 2,131.3 1,483.7 (6.4)— 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts$3,648.8 $1,736.4 $(25.0)$(27.3)$3,341.2 $1,496.3 $(29.0)$(28.5)
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
   Gross Other-Than-   Gross Other-Than-
 Fair Unrealized Temporary Fair Unrealized Temporary
 Value Gains Impairments Value Gains Impairments
 (in millions)
Cash and Cash Equivalents$20.5
 $
 $
 $18.7
 $
 $
Fixed Income Securities: 
  
  
  
  
  
United States Government974.3
 32.6
 (1.9) 785.4
 27.1
 (5.5)
Corporate Debt60.0
 3.5
 (1.2) 60.9
 2.3
 (1.4)
State and Local Government9.0
 1.0
 (0.2) 121.1
 0.4
 (0.7)
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities1,043.3
 37.1
 (3.3) 967.4
 29.8
 (7.6)
Equity Securities - Domestic1,369.2
 783.1
 (75.4) 1,270.1
 677.9
 (79.6)
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts$2,433.0
 $820.2
 $(78.7) $2,256.2
 $707.7
 $(87.2)



The following table provides the securities activity within the decommissioning and SNF trusts:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
 2023202220232022
 (in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales$688.7 $736.4 $1,206.3 $1,229.9 
Purchases of Investments697.0 745.5 1,233.3 1,253.2 
Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales6.4 10.9 54.8 16.7 
Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales3.7 17.9 12.3 25.1 
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
Proceeds from Investment Sales $519.5
 $650.0
 $1,808.6
 $2,427.0
Purchases of Investments 525.0
 656.5
 1,842.2
 2,452.9
Gross Realized Gains on Investment Sales 9.8
 13.9
 198.1
 41.9
Gross Realized Losses on Investment Sales 5.2
 6.5
 145.4
 22.2


The base cost of fixed income securities was $1$1.3 billion and $938 million$1.2 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, respectively.  The base cost of equity securities was $586$640 million and $592$654 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016,2022, respectively.


The fair value of fixed income securities held in the nuclear trust funds, summarized by contractual maturities, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 was as follows:
Fair Value of Fixed
Income Securities
(in millions)
Within 1 year$325.0 
After 1 year through 5 years496.9 
After 5 years through 10 years219.2 
After 10 years222.9 
Total$1,264.0 
169

 Fair Value of Fixed Income Securities
 (in millions)
Within 1 year$403.6
After 1 year through 5 years287.9
After 5 years through 10 years184.2
After 10 years167.6
Total$1,043.3



Fair Value Measurements of Financial Assets and Liabilities


The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrants’ financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.  As required by the accounting guidance for “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Management’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.  There have not been any significant changes in management’s valuation techniques.


AEP


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash$45.8 $— $— $— $45.8 
Other Cash Deposits (a)— — — 15.9 15.9 
Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds146.8 — — — 146.8 
Equity Securities – Mutual Funds (b)39.8 — — — 39.8 
Total Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash232.4 — — 15.9 248.3 
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d)12.5 893.6 276.5 (756.9)425.7 
Cash Flow Hedges:
Commodity Hedges (c)— 118.4 19.4 (17.2)120.6 
Total Risk Management Assets12.5 1,012.0 295.9 (774.1)546.3 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e)13.3 — — 10.9 24.2 
Fixed Income Securities:
United States Government— 1,191.9 — — 1,191.9 
Corporate Debt— 68.8 — — 68.8 
State and Local Government— 3.3 — — 3.3 
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities— 1,264.0 — — 1,264.0 
Equity Securities – Domestic (b)2,360.6 — — — 2,360.6 
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts2,373.9 1,264.0 — 10.9 3,648.8 
Total Assets$2,618.8 $2,276.0 $295.9 $(747.3)$4,443.4 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d)$26.5 $848.3 $169.8 $(719.4)$325.2 
Cash Flow Hedges:
Commodity Hedges (c)— 18.8 — (17.2)1.6 
Fair Value Hedges— 124.7 — — 124.7 
Total Risk Management Liabilities$26.5 $991.8 $169.8 $(736.6)$451.5 
170

  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a) $
 $
 $
 $343.9
 $343.9
           
Other Temporary Investments          
Restricted Cash (a) 158.6
 1.4
 
 12.9
 172.9
Fixed Income Securities  Mutual Funds
 103.2
 
 
 
 103.2
Equity Securities  Mutual Funds (b)
 34.6
 
 
 
 34.6
Total Other Temporary Investments
 296.4
 1.4
 
 12.9
 310.7
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d) 1.2
 307.9
 300.3
 (161.4) 448.0
Cash Flow Hedges:  
  
  
  
  
Commodity Hedges (c) 
 9.1
 1.3
 (6.1) 4.3
Interest Rate/Foreign Currency Hedges 
 4.2
 
 
 4.2
Total Risk Management Assets 1.2
 321.2
 301.6
 (167.5) 456.5
           
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts  
  
  
  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e) 14.0
 
 
 6.5
 20.5
Fixed Income Securities:  
  
  
  
  
United States Government 
 974.3
 
 
 974.3
Corporate Debt 
 60.0
 
 
 60.0
State and Local Government 
 9.0
 
 
 9.0
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities 
 1,043.3
 
 
 1,043.3
Equity Securities  Domestic (b)
 1,369.2
 
 
 
 1,369.2
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 1,383.2
 1,043.3
 
 6.5
 2,433.0
           
Total Assets $1,680.8
 $1,365.9
 $301.6
 $195.8
 $3,544.1
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (d) $3.2
 $306.6
 $205.9
 $(174.9) $340.8
Cash Flow Hedges:  
  
  
  
  
Commodity Hedges (c) 
 35.3
 50.7
 (6.1) 79.9
Fair Value Hedges 
 1.4
 
 
 1.4
Total Risk Management Liabilities $3.2
 $343.3
 $256.6
 $(181.0) $422.1




AEP


Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 20162022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash
Restricted Cash$47.1 $— $— $— $47.1 
Other Cash Deposits (a)— — — 9.0 9.0 
Fixed Income Securities – Mutual Funds144.1 — — — 144.1 
Equity Securities – Mutual Funds (b)34.5 — — — 34.5 
Total Other Temporary Investments and Restricted Cash225.7 — — 9.0 234.7 
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (f)15.0 1,197.5 314.4 (1,211.5)315.4 
Cash Flow Hedges:
Commodity Hedges (c)— 332.6 26.7 (52.8)306.5 
Interest Rate Hedges— 11.0 — — 11.0 
Total Risk Management Assets15.0 1,541.1 341.1 (1,264.3)632.9 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e)11.3 — — 9.9 21.2 
Fixed Income Securities:
United States Government— 1,123.8 — — 1,123.8 
Corporate Debt— 61.6 — — 61.6 
State and Local Government— 3.3 — — 3.3 
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities— 1,188.7 — — 1,188.7 
Equity Securities – Domestic (b)2,131.3 — — — 2,131.3 
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts2,142.6 1,188.7 — 9.9 3,341.2 
Total Assets$2,383.3 $2,729.8 $341.1 $(1,245.4)$4,208.8 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (f)$21.8 $870.9 $179.0 $(731.9)$339.8 
Cash Flow Hedges:
Commodity Hedges (c)— 74.3 1.7 (52.8)23.2 
Fair Value Hedges— 127.4 — — 127.4 
Total Risk Management Liabilities$21.8 $1,072.6 $180.7 $(784.7)$490.4 

171


  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a) $8.7
 $
 $
 $201.8
 $210.5
           
Other Temporary Investments          
Restricted Cash (a) 173.8
 5.1
 
 32.8
 211.7
Fixed Income Securities  Mutual Funds
 91.7
 
 
 
 91.7
Equity Securities  Mutual Funds (b)
 28.3
 
 
 
 28.3
Total Other Temporary Investments
 293.8
 5.1
 
 32.8
 331.7
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (f) 6.0
 379.9
 192.2
 (205.7) 372.4
Cash Flow Hedges:  
  
  
  
  
Commodity Hedges (c) 
 16.8
 1.7
 (7.3) 11.2
Total Risk Management Assets 6.0
 396.7
 193.9
 (213.0) 383.6
           
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts  
  
  
  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e) 7.3
 
 
 11.4
 18.7
Fixed Income Securities:  
  
  
  
  
United States Government 
 785.4
 
 
 785.4
Corporate Debt 
 60.9
 
 
 60.9
State and Local Government 
 121.1
 
 
 121.1
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities 
 967.4
 
 
 967.4
Equity Securities  Domestic (b)
 1,270.1
 
 
 
 1,270.1
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 1,277.4
 967.4
 
 11.4
 2,256.2
           
Total Assets $1,585.9
 $1,369.2
 $193.9
 $33.0
 $3,182.0
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (f) $8.2
 $352.0
 $166.7
 $(205.4) $321.5
Cash Flow Hedges:  
  
  
  
  
Commodity Hedges (c) 
 29.3
 24.7
 (7.3) 46.7
Fair Value Hedges 
 1.4
 
 
 1.4
Total Risk Management Liabilities $8.2
 $382.7
 $191.4
 $(212.7) $369.6



APCo

AEP Texas
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding$30.7 $— $— $— $30.7 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c)$— $0.5 $— $(0.5)$— 
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a) $8.3
 $
 $
 $0.1
 $8.4
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 22.2
 30.0
 (21.3) 30.9
           
Total Assets $8.3
 $22.2
 $30.0
 $(21.2) $39.3
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $21.8
 $0.6
 $(21.2) $1.2


December 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding$32.7 $— $— $— $32.7 

APCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
June 30, 2023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding$15.1 $— $— $— $15.1 
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)— 1.6 41.1 (3.3)39.4 
Total Assets$15.1 $1.6 $41.1 $(3.3)$54.5 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $3.4 $1.7 $(4.0)$1.1 

December 31, 20162022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding$14.4 $— $— $— $14.4 
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)— 0.7 69.4 (1.0)69.1 
Total Assets$14.4 $0.7 $69.4 $(1.0)$83.5 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $4.6 $0.3 $(1.4)$3.5 

172

  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a) $15.8
 $
 $
 $0.1
 $15.9
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 20.5
 3.9
 (21.8) 2.6
           
Total Assets $15.8
 $20.5
 $3.9
 $(21.7) $18.5
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $20.7
 $2.5
 $(22.0) $1.2



I&M

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $25.6 $8.2 $(3.3)$30.5 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e)13.3 — — 10.9 24.2 
Fixed Income Securities:
United States Government— 1,191.9 — — 1,191.9 
Corporate Debt— 68.8 — — 68.8 
State and Local Government— 3.3 — — 3.3 
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities— 1,264.0 — — 1,264.0 
Equity Securities - Domestic (b)2,360.6 — — — 2,360.6 
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts2,373.9 1,264.0 — 10.9 3,648.8 
Total Assets$2,373.9 $1,289.6 $8.2 $7.6 $3,679.3 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $3.8 $1.4 $(3.8)$1.4 

December 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $11.3 $5.3 $(1.2)$15.4 
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e)11.3 — — 9.9 21.2 
Fixed Income Securities:
United States Government— 1,123.8 — — 1,123.8 
Corporate Debt— 61.6 — — 61.6 
State and Local Government— 3.3 — — 3.3 
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities— 1,188.7 — — 1,188.7 
Equity Securities - Domestic (b)2,131.3 — — — 2,131.3 
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts2,142.6 1,188.7 — 9.9 3,341.2 
Total Assets$2,142.6 $1,200.0 $5.3 $8.7 $3,356.6 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $0.6 $0.7 $(1.3)$— 
173


  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $16.3
 $12.4
 $(16.6) $12.1
           
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts  
  
  
  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e) 14.0
 
 
 6.5
 20.5
Fixed Income Securities:  
  
  
  
  
United States Government 
 974.3
 
 
 974.3
Corporate Debt 
 60.0
 
 
 60.0
State and Local Government 
 9.0
 
 
 9.0
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities 
 1,043.3
 
 
 1,043.3
Equity Securities - Domestic (b) 1,369.2
 
 
 
 1,369.2
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 1,383.2
 1,043.3
 
 6.5
 2,433.0
           
Total Assets $1,383.2
 $1,059.6
 $12.4
 $(10.1) $2,445.1
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $16.4
 $2.2
 $(16.4) $2.2

I&M

OPCo
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
June 30, 2023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Liabilities:(in millions)
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $0.4 $54.0 $(0.4)$54.0 

December 31, 20162022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Liabilities:(in millions)
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $— $40.0 $(0.3)$39.7 
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $12.8
 $3.0
 $(12.3) $3.5
           
Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts  
  
  
  
  
Cash and Cash Equivalents (e) 7.3
 
 
 11.4
 18.7
Fixed Income Securities:  
  
  
  
 

United States Government 
 785.4
 
 
 785.4
Corporate Debt 
 60.9
 
 
 60.9
State and Local Government 
 121.1
 
 
 121.1
Subtotal Fixed Income Securities 
 967.4
 
 
 967.4
Equity Securities - Domestic (b) 1,270.1
 
 
 
 1,270.1
Total Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts
 1,277.4
 967.4
 
 11.4
 2,256.2
           
Total Assets $1,277.4
 $980.2
 $3.0
 $(0.9) $2,259.7
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $13.3
 $0.2
 $(12.4) $1.1



OPCo

PSO
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $2.9 $44.7 $(2.8)$44.8 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $4.8 $1.6 $(3.0)$3.4 

December 31, 2022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $— $24.0 $1.3 $25.3 
Cash Flow Hedges:
Interest Rate Hedges— 1.6 — (1.6)— 
Total Assets$— $1.6 $24.0 $(0.3)$25.3 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $1.7 $0.3 $(0.4)$1.6 
174


  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a) $15.6
 $
 $
 $
 $15.6
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 0.3
 
 (0.1) 0.2
           
Total Assets $15.6
 $0.3
 $
 $(0.1) $15.8
           
Liabilities:          
           
Risk Management Liabilities          
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $
 $138.5
 $
 $138.5

OPCo

SWEPCo
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
June 30, 2023
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $0.4 $28.1 $(0.5)$28.0 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $0.5 $2.1 $(0.8)$1.8 

December 31, 20162022
Level 1Level 2Level 3OtherTotal
Assets:(in millions)
Risk Management Assets
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $2.2 $14.6 $(0.4)$16.4 
Liabilities:
Risk Management Liabilities
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g)$— $1.6 $0.4 $(0.6)$1.4 
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Restricted Cash for Securitized Funding (a) $
 $
 $
 $27.2
 $27.2
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 0.4
 
 (0.2) 0.2
           
Total Assets $
 $0.4
 $
 $27.0
 $27.4
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $
 $119.0
 $
 $119.0




PSO

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
September 30, 2017
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $
 $4.8
 $(0.1) $4.7
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $
 $0.1
 $(0.1) $

PSO

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2016
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $0.2
 $0.7
 $(0.1) $0.8



SWEPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
September 30, 2017
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a) $
 $
 $
 $2.2
 $2.2
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 0.1
 13.3
 (0.2) 13.2
           
Total Assets $
 $0.1
 $13.3
 $2.0
 $15.4
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $0.1
 $0.2
 $(0.2) $0.1

SWEPCo

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2016
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Other Total
Assets: (in millions)
           
Cash and Cash Equivalents (a) $8.7
 $
 $
 $1.6
 $10.3
           
Risk Management Assets  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) 
 0.3
 0.8
 (0.2) 0.9
           
Total Assets $8.7
 $0.3
 $0.8
 $1.4
 $11.2
           
Liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
           
Risk Management Liabilities  
  
  
  
  
Risk Management Commodity Contracts (c) (g) $
 $0.3
 $0.1
 $(0.1) $0.3

(a)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent cash deposits in bank accounts with financial institutions or with third parties.  Level 1 and Level 2 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(b)Amounts represent publicly traded equity securities and equity-based mutual funds.
(c)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral under the accounting guidance for “Derivatives and Hedging.’’
(d)The September 30, 2017 maturity of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), is as follows:  Level 1 matures $(2) million in periods 2018-2020;  Level 2 matures $(1) million in 2017 and $3 million in periods 2018-2020 and $(1) million in periods 2021-2022;  Level 3 matures $23 million in 2017, $77 million in periods 2018-2020, $16 million in periods 2021-2022 and $(21) million in periods 2023-2032.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.
(e)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent accrued interest receivables from financial institutions.  Level 1 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(f)The December 31, 2016 maturity of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), is as follows:  Level 1 matures $(2) million in periods 2018-2020; Level 2 matures $20 million in 2017, $4 million in periods 2018-2020, $3 million in periods 2021-2022 and $1 million in periods 2023-2032; Level 3 matures $17 million in 2017, $28 million in periods 2018-2020, $11 million in periods 2021-2022 and $(31) million in periods 2023-2032.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.
(g)Substantially comprised of power contracts for the Registrant Subsidiaries.

There were no transfers between(a)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent cash deposits in bank accounts with financial institutions or third-parties.  Level 1 and Level 2 duringamounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.
(b)Amounts represent publicly traded equity securities and equity-based mutual funds.
(c)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent counterparty netting of risk management and hedging contracts and associated cash collateral under the threeaccounting guidance for “Derivatives and nine months ended SeptemberHedging.’’
(d)The June 30, 20172023 maturities of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), were as follows: Level 1 matures $(6) million in 2023 and 2016.$(8) million in periods 2024-2026; Level 2 matures $(27) million in 2023, $59 million in periods 2024-2026, $12 million in periods 2027-2028 and $2 million in periods 2029-2033; Level 3 matures $63 million in 2023, $56 million in periods 2024-2026, $1 million in periods 2027-2028 and $(14) million in periods 2029-2033.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.

(e)Amounts in “Other’’ column primarily represent accrued interest receivables from financial institutions.  Level 1 amounts primarily represent investments in money market funds.

(f)The December 31, 2022 maturities of the net fair value of risk management contracts prior to cash collateral, assets/(liabilities), were as follows: Level 1 matures $(7) million in 2023; Level 2 matures $182 million in 2023, $134 million in periods 2024-2026, $10 million in periods 2027-2028 and $1 million in periods 2029-2033; Level 3 matures $128 million in 2023, $6 million in periods 2024-2026, $6 million in periods 2027-2028 and $(5) million in periods 2029-2033.  Risk management commodity contracts are substantially comprised of power contracts.
(g)Substantially comprised of power contracts for the Registrant Subsidiaries.
175


The following tables set forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of net trading derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
 (in millions)
Balance as of March 31, 2023$45.1 $5.7 $1.1 $(46.9)$9.3 $5.8 
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)(86.8)(11.9)(3.2)(1.4)(42.1)(32.8)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)(15.8)— — — — — 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (c)4.7 — — — — — 
Settlements62.3 6.2 2.0 1.3 32.8 27.0 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e)(3.1)— — — — — 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f)119.7 39.4 6.9 (7.0)43.1 26.0 
Balance as of June 30, 2023$126.1 $39.4 $6.8 $(54.0)$43.1 $26.0 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
 (in millions)
Balance as of March 31, 2022$82.8 $6.6 $1.0 $(68.5)$6.5 $15.7 
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)38.6 5.7 (0.3)0.9 11.9 19.9 
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)(16.8)— — — — — 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (c)5.7 — — — — — 
Settlements(69.3)(12.4)(0.7)— (18.4)(27.9)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)2.4 — — — — — 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e)5.8 — — — — — 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f)234.7 79.7 9.8 19.2 64.5 37.7 
Balance as of June 30, 2022$283.9 $79.6 $9.8 $(48.4)$64.5 $45.4 
176


Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Balance as of June 30, 2017 $87.3
 $41.3
 $15.5
 $(130.5) $9.5
 $12.4
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (b) (c) 19.8
 6.2
 3.8
 (0.1) 4.0
 3.8
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (b) 14.8
 
 
 
 
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (24.3) 
 
 
 
 
Settlements (49.2) (16.2) (8.4) 1.2
 (6.9) (7.6)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e) 5.7
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e) 0.2
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f) (9.3) (1.9) (0.7) (9.1) (1.9) 4.5
Balance as of September 30, 2017 $45.0
 $29.4
 $10.2
 $(138.5) $4.7
 $13.1
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023AEPAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
 (in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2022$160.4 $69.1 $4.6 $(40.0)$23.7 $14.2 
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)(97.5)(47.9)(2.3)(1.7)(25.5)(20.3)
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)(3.0)— — — — — 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (c)(15.0)— — — — — 
Settlements(23.0)(21.1)(2.2)2.4 1.8 6.1 
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)(6.1)— — — — — 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e)(1.3)— — — — — 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f)111.6 39.3 6.7 (14.7)43.1 26.0 
Balance as of June 30, 2023$126.1 $39.4 $6.8 $(54.0)$43.1 $26.0 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022AEPAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
 (in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$103.1 $41.7 $(0.7)$(92.5)$12.1 $10.9 
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (a) (b)68.1 3.0 3.7 2.4 24.2 32.5 
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (a)(35.7)— — — — — 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (c)22.5 — — — — — 
Settlements(149.0)(44.7)(3.0)1.4 (36.3)(41.0)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e)4.4 — — — — — 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e)9.6 — — — — — 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f)260.9 79.6 9.8 40.3 64.5 43.0 
Balance as of June 30, 2022$283.9 $79.6 $9.8 $(48.4)$64.5 $45.4 

(a)Included in revenues on the statements of income.
(b)Represents the change in fair value between the beginning of the reporting period and the settlement of the risk management commodity contract.
(c)Included in cash flow hedges on the statements of comprehensive income.
(d)Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 2.
(e)Transfers are recognized based on their value at the beginning of the reporting period that the transfer occurred.
(f)Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These changes in fair value are recorded as regulatory liabilities for net gains and as regulatory assets for net losses or accounts payable.

177
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 AEP APCo (a) I&M (a) OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Balance as of June 30, 2016 $149.3
 $(12.9) $3.5
 $(14.6) $1.1
 $1.4
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (b) (c) 34.2
 22.7
 3.8
 (0.1) 0.4
 4.0
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (b) 12.3
 
 
 
 
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (34.4) 
 
 
 
 
Settlements (37.1) (17.9) (5.0) 0.9
 (0.7) (4.4)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e) 13.1
 0.1
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (10.0) 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f) (29.0) 0.9
 2.2
 (95.3) 0.3
 0.3
Balance as of September 30, 2016 $98.4
 $(7.1) $4.5
 $(109.1) $1.1
 $1.3


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 AEP APCo I&M OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 $2.5
 $1.4
 $2.8
 $(119.0) $0.7
 $0.7
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (b) (c) 37.4
 17.2
 4.0
 (1.0) 3.1
 6.0
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (b) 37.2
 
 
 
 
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (29.5) 
 
 
 
 
Settlements (49.7) (18.9) (7.1) 5.1
 (3.8) (6.8)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e) 16.1
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e) (9.1) 
 
 
 
 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f) 40.1
 29.7
 10.5
 (23.6) 4.7
 13.2
Balance as of September 30, 2017 $45.0
 $29.4
 $10.2
 $(138.5) $4.7
 $13.1


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 AEP APCo (a) I&M (a) OPCo PSO SWEPCo
  (in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2015 $146.9
 $11.7
 $4.3
 $15.9
 $0.6
 $0.8
Realized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) (b) (c) 42.1
 25.5
 7.0
 (1.8) (1.0) 7.7
Unrealized Gain (Loss) Included in Net Income (or Changes in Net Assets) Relating to Assets Still Held at the Reporting Date (b) 45.5
 
 
 
 
 
Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses) Included in Other Comprehensive Income (16.7) 
 
 
 
 
Settlements (67.1) (36.2) (10.3) 4.0
 0.4
 (8.4)
Transfers into Level 3 (d) (e) 11.2
 
 
 
 
 
Transfers out of Level 3 (e) 1.1
 0.1
 0.1
 
 
 
Changes in Fair Value Allocated to Regulated Jurisdictions (f) (64.6) (8.2) 3.4
 (127.2) 1.1
 1.2
Balance as of September 30, 2016 $98.4
 $(7.1) $4.5
 $(109.1) $1.1
 $1.3

(a)Includes both affiliated and nonaffiliated transactions.
(b)Included in revenues on the statements of income.
(c)Represents the change in fair value between the beginning of the reporting period and the settlement of the risk management commodity contract.
(d)Represents existing assets or liabilities that were previously categorized as Level 2.
(e)Transfers are recognized based on their value at the beginning of the reporting period that the transfer occurred.
(f)Relates to the net gains (losses) of those contracts that are not reflected on the statements of income.  These net gains (losses) are recorded as regulatory liabilities/assets or accounts payable.



The following tables quantify the significant unobservable inputs used in developing the fair value of Level 3 positions:


Significant Unobservable Inputs
SeptemberJune 30, 20172023
AEP
SignificantInput/Range
Type ofFair ValueValuationUnobservableWeighted
CompanyInputAssetsLiabilitiesTechniqueInputLowHighAverage (c)
(in millions)
AEPEnergy Contracts$158.4 $158.1 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)$1.89 $90.40 $44.95 
AEPNatural Gas Contracts0.2 0.2 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (b)2.14 4.21 3.21 
AEPFTRs137.3 11.5 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)(17.92)11.35 (0.20)
APCoNatural Gas Contracts0.2 — Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (b)2.91 4.19 3.35 
APCoFTRs40.9 1.7 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)(3.60)9.53 1.37 
I&MFTRs8.2 1.4 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)(6.02)9.11 1.07 
OPCoEnergy Contracts— 54.0 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)16.97 71.80 41.40 
PSOFTRs44.7 1.6 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)(17.92)0.87 (4.44)
SWEPCoNatural Gas Contracts— 0.2 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (b)2.91 4.19 3.35 
SWEPCoFTRs28.1 1.9 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price (a)(17.92)0.87 (4.44)
     Significant Input/Range
 Fair ValueValuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$233.8
 $252.6
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a)  $(0.05) $92.77
 $35.82
       Counterparty Credit Risk (b)  10
 539
 204
Natural Gas Contracts0.9
 
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (c)  2.47
 3.03
 2.68
FTRs66.9
 4.0
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a)  (9.80) 9.37
 0.32
Total$301.6
 $256.6
      
  
  

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 20162022
AEP
SignificantInput/Range
Type ofFair ValueValuationUnobservableWeighted
CompanyInputAssetsLiabilitiesTechniqueInput (a)LowHighAverage (c)
(in millions)
AEPEnergy Contracts$204.0 $167.4 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price$2.91 $187.34 $49.14 
AEPFTRs137.1 13.3 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price(36.45)20.72 1.18 
APCoFTRs69.4 0.3 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price(2.82)18.88 3.89 
I&MFTRs5.3 0.7 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price0.16 18.79 1.23 
OPCoEnergy Contracts— 40.0 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price2.91 187.34 48.76 
PSOFTRs24.0 0.3 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price(36.45)3.40 (7.55)
SWEPCoFTRs14.6 0.4 Discounted Cash FlowForward Market Price(36.45)3.40 (7.55)

(a)Represents market prices in dollars per MWh.
(b)Represents market prices in dollars per MMBtu.
(c)The weighted average is the product of the forward market price of the underlying commodity and volume weighted by term.

178
     Significant Input/Range
 Fair ValueValuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$183.8
 $187.1
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a)  $6.51
 $86.59
 $39.40
       Counterparty Credit Risk (b)  35
 824
 391
FTRs10.1
 4.3
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a)  (7.99) 8.91
 0.86
Total$193.9
 $191.4
      
  
  



Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017
APCo


     Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$1.0
 $0.4
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $14.85
 $45.72
 $33.99
FTRs29.0
 0.2
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  0.08
 6.36
 1.20
Total$30.0
 $0.6
      
  
  

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016
APCo
     Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$0.4
 $0.4
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $19.68
 $48.55
 $36.34
FTRs3.5
 2.1
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  (0.23) 8.91
 2.37
Total$3.9
 $2.5
      
  
  

Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017
I&M
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$0.6
 $0.3
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $14.85
 $45.72
 $33.99
FTRs11.8
 1.9
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  (0.02) 6.36
 0.71
Total$12.4
 $2.2
      
  
  

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016
I&M
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$0.3
 $0.2
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $19.68
 $48.55
 $36.34
FTRs2.7
 
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  (7.90) 8.91
 1.32
Total$3.0
 $0.2
      
  
  



Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017
OPCo
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$
 $138.5
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a) $22.89
 $61.48
 $41.21
       Counterparty Credit Risk (b) 10
 210
 150
Total$
 $138.5
          

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016
OPCo
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Energy Contracts$
 $119.0
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a) $30.14
 $71.85
 $47.45
 

 

   Counterparty Credit Risk (b) 47
 340
 272
Total$
 $119.0
          

Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017
PSO
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
FTRs$4.8
 $0.1
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $(9.80) $1.03
 $(0.69)

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016
PSO
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
FTRs$0.7
 $
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $(7.99) $1.03
 $(0.36)


Significant Unobservable Inputs
September 30, 2017
SWEPCo
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input Low High Average
 (in millions)          
Natural Gas Contracts$0.9
 $
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (c) $2.47
 $3.03
 $2.68
FTRs12.4
 0.2
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price (a) (9.80) 1.03
 (0.69)
 $13.3
 $0.2
          

Significant Unobservable Inputs
December 31, 2016
SWEPCo
       Significant Input/Range
 Fair Value Valuation Unobservable     Weighted
 Assets Liabilities Technique Input (a) Low High Average
 (in millions)          
FTRs$0.8
 $0.1
 Discounted Cash Flow  Forward Market Price  $(7.99) $1.03
 $(0.36)

(a)Represents market prices in dollars per MWh.
(b)Represents prices of credit default swaps used to calculate counterparty credit risk, reported in basis points.
(c)Represents market prices in dollars per MMBtu.

The following table provides sensitivitythe measurement uncertainty of fair value measurements to increases (decreases) in significant unobservable inputs related to Energy Contracts Natural Gas Contracts and FTRs for the Registrants as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 2016:

Sensitivity of Fair Value Measurements
2022:
Significant Unobservable InputPositionChange in InputImpact on Fair Value
Measurement
Forward Market PriceBuyIncrease (Decrease)Higher (Lower)
Forward Market PriceSellIncrease (Decrease)Lower (Higher)
Significant Unobservable InputPositionChange in Input
Impact on Fair Value
Measurement
Forward Market PriceBuyIncrease (Decrease)Higher (Lower)
Forward Market PriceSellIncrease (Decrease)Lower (Higher)
Counterparty Credit RiskLossIncrease (Decrease)Higher (Lower)
Counterparty Credit RiskGainIncrease (Decrease)Lower (Higher)

179



11.  INCOME TAXES


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants unless indicated otherwise.


Effective Tax Rates (ETR)


The Registrants’ interim ETR for AEP’s operating companies reflect the estimated annual ETR for 20172023 and 2016,2022, adjusted for tax expense associated with certain discrete items.

The Registrants include the amortization of Excess ADIT not subject to normalization requirements in the annual estimated ETR when regulatory proceedings instruct the Registrants to provide the benefits of Tax Reform to customers over multiple interim periods.  Certain regulatory proceedings instruct the Registrants to provide the benefits of Tax Reform to customers in a single period (e.g. by applying the Excess ADIT not subject to normalization requirements against an existing regulatory asset balance) and in these circumstances, the Registrants recognize the tax benefit discretely in the period recorded. The annual amount of Excess ADIT approved by the Registrant’s regulatory commissions may not impact the ETR differs from the federal statutory tax rate of 35% primarilyratably during each interim period due to tax adjustments, statethe variability of pretax book income taxesbetween interim periods and other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis.the application of an annual estimated ETR.


The ETR from continuing operations for each of the Registrants are included in the following table. Significant variances in the ETR are described below.tables:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
AEPAEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
U.S. Federal Statutory Rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:
State Income Tax, net of Federal Benefit2.1 %0.6 %2.6 %3.2 %0.7 %0.8 %2.0 %(1.6)%
Tax Reform Excess ADIT Reversal(6.2)%(1.3)%0.1 %(4.5)%(6.1)%(8.5)%(17.2)%(4.2)%
Production and Investment Tax Credits(9.9)%(0.2)%— %(0.1)%0.1 %— %(55.1)%(29.2)%
Flow Through(1.0)%0.1 %0.2 %(5.1)%(4.4)%1.2 %0.3 %(0.8)%
AFUDC Equity(1.2)%(0.9)%(2.1)%(1.5)%(0.1)%(0.7)%(1.4)%— %
Other0.4 %0.3 %— %(0.4)%0.1 %0.1 %— %0.7 %
Effective Income Tax Rate5.2 %19.6 %21.8 %12.6 %11.3 %13.9 %(50.4)%(14.1)%
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
AEPAEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
U.S. Federal Statutory Rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:
State Income Tax, net of Federal Benefit1.3 %0.7 %2.9 %(1.0)%(1.3)%1.0 %3.9 %2.5 %
Tax Reform Excess ADIT Reversal(7.1)%(2.1)%0.3 %(20.4)%(17.2)%(7.8)%(19.2)%(5.2)%
Production and Investment Tax Credits(6.1)%(0.6)%— %— %(3.4)%— %(32.2)%(19.8)%
Flow Through(0.1)%0.2 %0.4 %(1.4)%(1.2)%0.2 %0.3 %— %
AFUDC Equity(1.1)%(1.4)%(2.3)%(1.5)%(1.3)%(0.7)%(0.4)%(0.5)%
Discrete Tax Adjustments0.3 %— %— %(6.0)%— %— %— %0.8 %
Other1.1 %0.1 %0.1 %(0.2)%1.3 %0.1 %0.5 %(0.1)%
Effective Income Tax Rate9.3 %17.9 %22.4 %(9.5)%(2.1)%13.8 %(26.1)%(1.3)%
180


  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Company 2017 2016 2017 2016
AEP 33.0% 40.4% 35.3% (195.6)%
AEPTCo 33.5% 33.5% 33.8% 32.6 %
APCo 33.4% 36.1% 35.5% 36.2 %
I&M 30.6% 31.8% 30.1% 29.5 %
OPCo 36.9% 31.7% 35.6% 33.4 %
PSO 37.2% 37.7% 37.4% 36.8 %
SWEPCo 21.2% 28.9% 25.7% 26.7 %
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
AEPAEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
U.S. Federal Statutory Rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:
State Income Tax, net of Federal Benefit2.0 %0.5 %2.6 %2.6 %2.4 %0.9 %2.0 %(1.2)%
Tax Reform Excess ADIT Reversal(6.2)%(1.4)%0.2 %(4.5)%(7.2)%(7.6)%(17.1)%(4.0)%
Production and Investment Tax Credits(9.8)%(0.2)%— %(0.1)%(0.6)%— %(55.2)%(28.2)%
Flow Through(0.5)%0.2 %0.2 %(0.8)%(2.9)%0.8 %0.3 %(0.3)%
AFUDC Equity(1.3)%(1.1)%(1.8)%(0.9)%(0.3)%(0.8)%(1.4)%(0.3)%
Discrete Tax Adjustments(1.4)%— %— %2.4 %1.0 %— %— %— %
Other0.3 %0.2 %— %(0.1)%0.1 %0.1 %0.1 %0.1 %
Effective Income Tax Rate4.1 %19.2 %22.2 %19.6 %13.5 %14.4 %(50.3)%(12.9)%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
AEPAEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
U.S. Federal Statutory Rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increase (decrease) due to:
State Income Tax, net of Federal Benefit1.4 %0.5 %2.7 %1.5 %0.4 %0.9 %3.5 %2.4 %
Tax Reform Excess ADIT Reversal(6.8)%(2.0)%0.3 %(11.0)%(17.2)%(7.8)%(18.6)%(5.1)%
Production and Investment Tax Credits(7.1)%(0.4)%— %— %(2.3)%— %(31.4)%(20.8)%
Flow Through0.1 %0.2 %0.3 %0.6 %(1.6)%0.6 %0.3 %(0.2)%
AFUDC Equity(1.0)%(1.1)%(1.9)%(1.0)%(0.9)%(0.6)%(0.5)%(0.5)%
Discrete Tax Adjustments(0.2)%— %— %(2.6)%— %— %— %0.5 %
Other0.5 %(0.1)%0.2 %— %0.4 %(0.1)%0.3 %— %
Effective Income Tax Rate7.9 %18.1 %22.6 %8.5 %(0.2)%14.0 %(25.4)%(2.7)%
AEP

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

The decrease in the ETR is due to the prior year reversal of a $66 million capital loss valuation allowance related to the pending sale of certain merchant generation assets and prior year tax return adjustments related to the disposition of AEP’s commercial barging operations.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

The increase in the ETR is primarily due to the increase in pretax book income driven by the impairment of certain merchant generation assets in the third quarter of 2016. The increase in the ETR is also due to the prior year reversal of a $56 million unrealized capital loss valuation allowance where AEP effectively settled a 2011 audit issue with the IRS, the prior year reversal of a $66 million capital loss valuation allowance related to the pending sale of certain merchant generation assets and prior year tax return adjustments related to the disposition of AEP’s commercial barging operations.

APCo

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

The decrease in the ETR is primarily due to the recording of favorable federal income tax adjustments and a decrease in pretax book income.



OPCo

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

The increase in the ETR is primarily due to changes in other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis and the recording of federal income tax adjustments.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

The increase in the ETR is primarily due to changes in other book/tax differences which are accounted for on a flow-through basis, the recording of federal income tax adjustments and an increase in pretax book income.

SWEPCo

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

The decrease in the ETR is primarily due to a $10 million decrease in Income Tax Expense related to income tax benefits attributable to SWEPCo’s noncontrolling interest in Sabine.

Federal and State Income Tax Audit Status


The statute of limitations for the IRS to examine AEP and subsidiaries are no longer subjectoriginally filed federal return has expired for tax years 2016 and earlier. AEP has agreed to U.S. federal examinationextend the statute of limitations on the 2017-2019 tax returns to October 31, 2024, to allow time for years before 2011.the current IRS audit to be completed including a refund claim approval by the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. The statute of limitations for the 2020 return is set to naturally expire in October 2024 as well.

The current IRS examination of years 2011, 2012audit and 2013 startedassociated refund claim evolved from a net operating loss carryback to 2015 that originated in April 2014.the 2017 return. AEP has received and subsidiaries received a Revenue Agents Report in April 2016, completingagreed to two IRS proposed adjustments on the 2011 through 2013 audit cycle indicating an agreed upon audit.2017 tax return, which were immaterial. The 2011 through 2013 audit was submittedexam is nearly complete, and AEP is currently working with the IRS to submit the refund claim to the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation for approval. The Joint Committee referred the audit back to the IRS exam team for further consideration. Although the outcome of tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion, adequate provisions for federal income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such matters.  In addition, the Registrants accrue interest on these uncertain tax positions.  Management is not aware of any issues for open tax years that uponresolution and final resolution are expected to materially impact net income.approval.


AEP and subsidiaries file income tax returns in various state and local or foreign jurisdictions. These taxing authorities routinely examine the tax returns.returns, and AEP and subsidiaries are currently under examination in several state and local jurisdictions. However, itGenerally, the statutes of limitations have expired for tax years prior to 2017. In addition, management is possible that previously filedmonitoring and continues to evaluate the potential impact of federal legislation and corresponding state conformity.


181


Federal Legislation

In August 2022, President Biden signed H.R. 5376 into law, commonly known as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 or IRA. Most notably this budget reconciliation legislation creates a 15% minimum tax returns have positions that may be challenged by theseon adjusted financial statement income (Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax or CAMT), extends and increases the value of PTCs and ITCs, adds a nuclear and clean hydrogen PTC, an energy storage ITC and allows the sale or transfer of tax authorities.  Management believes that adequatecredits to third parties for cash. As further significant guidance from Treasury and the IRS is expected on the tax provisions for income taxes have been made for potential liabilities resulting from such challenges and that the ultimate resolution of these audits will not materially impact net income.  The Registrants are no longer subject to state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2009.

State Tax Legislation (Applies to AEP, APCo, I&M and OPCo)

Legislation was enacted in the state of Illinois in July 2017 increasingIRA, AEP will continue to monitor any issued guidance and evaluate the corporate income tax rate from 5.25% to 7% effective July 1, 2017, with the increased rate applied to the portion of the tax year fallingimpact on or after that date. With the inclusion of the 2.5% Illinois Replacement Tax, the total Illinois corporate income tax rate increased from 7.75% to 9.5%, effective July 1, 2017. The legislation is not expected to materially impactfuture net income, cash flows orand financial condition.



In December 2022, the IRS released Notice 2023-7 addressing time sensitive issues related to the CAMT. The notice provided initial guidance that AEP can begin to rely on in 2023 and also stated that additional guidance is expected, of which AEP will continue to monitor and assess. Notably, the interim guidance in Notice 2023-7 confirmed the CAMT depreciation adjustment includes tax depreciation that is capitalized to inventory under §263A and recovered as part of cost of goods sold, providing significant relief to AEP’s potential CAMT exposure.

AEP and subsidiaries expect to be applicable corporations for purposes of the CAMT beginning in 2023. CAMT cash taxes are expected to be partially offset by regulatory recovery, the utilization of tax credits and additionally the cash inflow generated by the sale of tax credits. The sale of tax credits will be presented in the operating section of the statements of cash flows consistent with the presentation of cash taxes paid. AEP will present the gain or loss on sale of tax credits through income tax expense.

In June 2023, the IRS issued temporary regulations related to the transfer of tax credits. AEP and subsidiaries have qualifying tax credits that are eligible to be transferred and, depending on market conditions, will consider selling qualifying tax credits in the second half of 2023.


182


12.  FINANCING ACTIVITIES


The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants, unless indicated otherwise.


Common Stock (Applies to AEP)

At-the-Market (ATM) Program

In 2020, AEP filed a prospectus supplement and executed an Equity Distribution Agreement, pursuant to which AEP may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $1 billion of its common stock through an ATM offering program, including an equity forward sales component. The compensation paid to the selling agents by AEP may be up to 2% of the gross offering proceeds of the shares. There were no issuances under the ATM program for the six months ended June 30, 2023.

Long-term Debt Outstanding (Applies to AEP)


The following table details long-term debt outstanding:outstanding, net of issuance costs and premiums or discounts:
Type of DebtJune 30, 2023December 31, 2022
 (in millions)
Senior Unsecured Notes$33,491.5 $30,174.8 
Pollution Control Bonds1,770.9 1,770.2 
Notes Payable165.8 269.7 
Securitization Bonds432.1 487.8 
Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation (a)292.3 285.6 
Junior Subordinated Notes (b)2,385.0 2,381.3 
Other Long-term Debt1,604.7 1,431.6 
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding40,142.3 36,801.0 
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year3,380.3 2,486.4 
Long-term Debt$36,762.0 $34,314.6 

(a)Pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, I&M, a nuclear licensee, has an obligation to the United States Department of Energy for SNF disposal. The obligation includes a one-time fee for nuclear fuel consumed prior to April 7, 1983. Trust fund assets related to this obligation were $341 million and $330 million as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, and are included in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on the balance sheets.
(b)See “Equity Units” section below for additional information.

183

Type of Debt September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 
  (in millions) 
Senior Unsecured Notes $16,038.6
 $14,761.0
(b)
Pollution Control Bonds 1,612.4
 1,725.1
 
Notes Payable 224.5
 326.9
 
Securitization Bonds 1,449.4
 1,705.0
 
Spent Nuclear Fuel Obligation (a) 267.9
 266.3
 
Other Long-term Debt 1,128.9
 1,606.9
 
Total Long-term Debt Outstanding 20,721.7
 20,391.2
(b)
Long-term Debt Due Within One Year 2,359.3
 3,013.4
(b)
Long-term Debt $18,362.4
 $17,377.8
(b)


(a)Pursuant to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, I&M, a nuclear licensee, has an obligation to the United States Department of Energy for spent nuclear fuel disposal.  The obligation includes a one-time fee for nuclear fuel consumed prior to April 7, 1983.  Trust fund assets related to this obligation were $311 million and $311 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and are included in Spent Nuclear Fuel and Decommissioning Trusts on the balance sheets.
(b)Amounts include debt related to the Lawrenceburg Plant that has been classified as Liabilities Held for Sale on the balance sheet. See “Gavin, Waterford, Darby and Lawrenceburg Plants (Generation & Marketing Segment)” section of Note 6 for additional information.


Long-term Debt Activity


Long-term debt and other securities issued, retired and principal payments made during the first ninesix months of 20172023 are shown in the tables below:following tables:
PrincipalInterest
CompanyType of DebtAmount (a)RateDue Date
Issuances: (in millions)(%)
AEPSenior Unsecured Notes$850.0 5.632033
AEPTCoSenior Unsecured Notes700.0 5.402053
AEP TexasSenior Unsecured Notes450.0 5.402033
APCoOther Long-term Debt200.0 Variable2024
I&MSenior Unsecured Notes500.0 5.632053
OPCoSenior Unsecured Notes400.0 5.002033
PSOSenior Unsecured Notes475.0 5.252033
SWEPCoSenior Unsecured Notes350.0 5.302033
Non-Registrant:
KPCoPollution Control Bonds65.0 4.702026
Transource EnergyOther Long-term Debt13.0 Variable2025
Total Issuances$4,003.0 

(a)Amounts indicated on the statements of cash flows are net of issuance costs and premium or discount and will not tie to the issuance amounts.

PrincipalInterest
CompanyType of DebtAmount PaidRateDue Date
Retirements and Principal Payments:(in millions)(%)
AEP TexasSenior Unsecured Notes$125.0 3.092023
AEP TexasSecuritization Bonds31.5 2.852024
AEP TexasSecuritization Bonds11.7 2.062025
APCoSecuritization Bonds9.7 2.012023
APCoSecuritization Bonds3.3 3.772028
I&MSenior Unsecured Notes250.0 3.202023
I&MNotes Payable1.2 Variable2023
I&MNotes Payable2.4 Variable2024
I&MNotes Payable9.2 Variable2025
I&MNotes Payable7.9 0.932025
I&MNotes Payable13.7 3.442026
I&MNotes Payable13.6 5.932027
I&MOther Long-term Debt1.2 6.002025
OPCoOther Long-term Debt0.6 1.152028
PSOOther Long-term Debt0.3 3.002027
SWEPCoNotes Payable25.0 6.372024
SWEPCoNotes Payable30.9 4.582032
SWEPCoOther Long-term Debt38.2 4.682028
Non-Registrant:
KPCoPollution Control Bonds65.0 2.352023
Transource EnergySenior Unsecured Notes1.3 2.752050
Total Retirements and Principal Payments$641.7 


184


Company Type of Debt Principal Amount (a) Interest Rate Due Date
Issuances:   (in millions) (%)  
AEPTCo Senior Unsecured Notes $125.0
 3.10 2026
AEPTCo Senior Unsecured Notes 500.0
 3.75 2047
APCo Senior Unsecured Notes 325.0
 3.30 2027
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 25.0
 Variable 2019
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 40.0
 2.05 2021
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 52.0
 Variable 2021
I&M Senior Unsecured Notes 300.0
 3.75 2047
SWEPCo Other Long-term Debt 115.0
 Variable 2020
    

 
 
Non-Registrant:   

 
 
AEP Texas Pollution Control Bonds 60.0
 1.75 2020
AEP Texas Senior Unsecured Notes 400.0
 2.40 2022
AEP Texas Senior Unsecured Notes 300.0
 3.80 2047
KPCo Pollution Control Bonds 65.0
 2.00 2020
KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 65.0
 3.13 2024
KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 40.0
 3.35 2027
KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 165.0
 3.45 2029
KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 55.0
 4.12 2047
Transource Missouri Other Long-term Debt 7.0
 Variable 2018
Transource Energy Other Long-term Debt 132.1
 Variable 2020
Total Issuances   $2,771.1
 
 
Long-term Debt Subsequent Event

(a)Amounts indicated on the statements of cash flows are net of issuance costs and premium or discount and will not tie to the issuance amounts.


Company Type of Debt  Principal Amount Paid Interest Rate Due Date
Retirements and Principal Payments:   (in millions) (%)  
APCo Senior Unsecured Notes $250.0
 5.00 2017
APCo Securitization Bonds 23.5
 2.008 2024
APCo Pollution Control Bonds 104.4
 Variable 2017
I&M��Notes Payable 4.9
 Variable 2017
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 25.0
 Variable 2017
I&M Notes Payable 22.3
 Variable 2019
I&M Notes Payable 23.6
 Variable 2019
I&M Notes Payable 23.9
 Variable 2020
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 52.0
 Variable 2017
I&M Notes Payable 24.3
 Variable 2021
I&M Other Long-term Debt 1.1
 6.00 2025
I&M Pollution Control Bonds 50.0
 Variable 2025
OPCo Securitization Bonds 16.2
 0.958 2017
OPCo Securitization Bonds 22.5
 0.958 2018
OPCo Securitization Bonds 7.6
 2.049 2019
OPCo Other Long-term Debt 0.1
 1.149 2028
PSO Other Long-term Debt 0.3
 3.00 2027
SWEPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 250.0
 5.55 2017
SWEPCo Other Long-term Debt 100.0
 Variable 2017
SWEPCo Other Long-term Debt 0.2
 3.50 2023
SWEPCo Other Long-term Debt 0.1
 4.28 2023
SWEPCo Notes Payable 3.3
 4.58 2032
         
Non-Registrant:        
AEGCo Senior Unsecured Notes 152.7
 6.33 2037
AGR Other Long-term Debt 500.0
 Variable 2017
KPCo Pollution Control Bonds 65.0
 Variable 2017
KPCo Senior Unsecured Notes 325.0
 6.00 2017
TCC Securitization Bonds 27.2
 0.88 2017
TCC Securitization Bonds 161.2
 5.17 2018
TCC Pollution Control Bonds 60.0
 5.20 2030
Transource Missouri Other Long-term Debt 130.8
 Variable 2018
Total Retirements and Principal Payments   $2,427.2
    


In October 2017,July 2023, I&M retired $1$8 million of Notes Payable related to DCC Fuel.


Equity Units (Applies to AEP)

2020 Equity Units

In October 2017,August 2020, AEP Texas retired $41issued 17 million Equity Units initially in the form of 5.625% Pollution Control Bondscorporate units, at a stated amount of $50 per unit, for a total stated amount of $850 million. Net proceeds from the issuance were approximately $833 million. The proceeds were used to support AEP’s overall capital expenditure plans.

Each corporate unit represents a 1/20 undivided beneficial ownership interest in $1,000 principal amount of AEP’s 1.30% Junior Subordinated Notes due in 2017.

As of September 30, 2017, trustees held,2025 and a forward equity purchase contract which settles after three years in August 2023. In June 2023, AEP successfully remarketed the Junior Subordinated Notes on behalf of holders of the corporate units. AEP $728did not receive any proceeds from the remarketing which were used to purchase a portfolio of treasury securities maturing on August 14, 2023. On August 15, 2023, the proceeds from the maturing treasury portfolio, currently held by the collateral agent, will be used to settle the forward equity purchase contract entered into as part of the Equity Units transaction. The interest rate on the Junior Subordinated Notes was reset to 5.699% with the maturity remaining in 2025.

Each forward equity purchase contract obligates the holder to purchase, and AEP to sell, for $50 a number of shares in common stock in accordance with the conversion ratios set forth below (subject to an anti-dilution adjustment):

If the AEP common stock market price is equal to or greater than $99.95: 0.5003 shares per contract.
If the AEP common stock market price is less than $99.95 but greater than $83.29: a number of shares per contract equal to $50 divided by the applicable market price. The holder receives a variable number of shares at $50.
If the AEP common stock market price is less than or equal to $83.29: 0.6003 shares per contract.

At the time of issuance, the $850 million of their reacquired Pollution Control Bonds. Of this total, $104notes were recorded within Long-term Debt on the balance sheets. The present value of the purchase contract payments of $121 million $50 millionwere recorded in Deferred Credits and $345 million relatedOther Noncurrent Liabilitieswith a current portion in Other Current Liabilities at the time of issuance, representing the obligation to APCo, I&Mmake forward equity contract payments, with an offsetting reduction to Paid-in Capital. The difference between the face value and OPCo, respectively.present value of the purchase contract payments will be accreted to Interest Expense on the statements of income over the three year period ending in 2023. The liability recorded for the contract payments is considered non-cash and excluded from the statements of cash flows. Until settlement of the forward equity purchase contract, earnings per share dilution resulting from the equity unit issuance will be determined under the treasury stock method. The maximum amount of shares AEP will be required to issue to settle the purchase contract is 10,205,100 shares (subject to an anti-dilution adjustment).



Debt Covenants (Applies to AEP and AEPTCo)


Covenants in AEPTCo’s note purchase agreements and indenture also limit the amount of contractually-defined priority debt (which includes a further sub-limit of $50 million of secured debt) to 10% of consolidated tangible net assets. AEPTCo’s contractually-defined priority debt was 0.6% of consolidated tangible net assets as of June 30, 2023. The method for calculating the consolidated tangible net assets is contractually definedcontractually-defined in the note purchase agreements.



185


Dividend Restrictions


Utility Subsidiaries’ Restrictions


Parent depends on its utility subsidiaries to pay dividends to shareholders. AEP utility subsidiaries pay dividends to Parent provided funds are legally available. Various financing arrangements and regulatory requirements may impose certain restrictions on the ability of the subsidiaries to transfer funds to Parent in the form of dividends.


All of the dividends declared by AEP’s utility subsidiaries that provide transmission or local distribution services are subject to a Federal Power Act restrictionrequirement that prohibits the payment of dividends out of capital accounts without regulatory approval;in certain circumstances; payment of dividends is generally allowed out of retained earnings only. Additionally, theearnings. The Federal Power Act also creates a reserve on earnings attributable to hydroelectric generation plants. Because of their ownership of such plants, this reserve applies to AGR, APCo and I&M.


Certain AEP subsidiaries have credit agreements that contain a covenantcovenants that limitslimit their debt to capitalization ratio to 67.5%. As of September 30, 2017, no subsidiaries have exceeded their debt to capitalization limit. The payment of cash dividends indirectly results in an increase in the percentage of debt to total capitalization of the AEP subsidiary distributing the dividend. The method for calculating outstanding debt and capitalization is contractually definedcontractually-defined in the credit agreements.


As of September 30, 2017, theThe Federal Power Act restriction does not limit the ability of the AEP subsidiaries to pay dividends out of retained earnings.


Parent Restrictions (Applies to AEP)


The holders of AEP’s common stock are entitled to receive the dividends declared by the Board of Directors provided funds are legally available for such dividends. Parent’s income primarily derives from common stock equity in the earnings of its utility subsidiaries.


Pursuant to the leverage restrictions in credit agreements, AEP must maintain a percentage of debt to total capitalization at a level that does not exceed 67.5%. As of September 30, 2017, AEP has not exceeded its debt to capitalization limit.  The payment of cash dividends indirectly results in an increase in the percentage of debt to total capitalization of the company distributing the dividend.  The method for calculating outstanding debt and capitalization is contractually definedcontractually-defined in the credit agreements.




186


Corporate Borrowing Program - AEP System (Applies to all Registrant Subsidiaries)


The AEP System uses a corporate borrowing program to meet the short-term borrowing needs of AEP’s subsidiaries. The corporate borrowing program includes a Utility Money Pool, which funds AEP’s utility subsidiaries, andsubsidiaries; a Nonutility Money Pool, which funds certain AEP nonutility subsidiaries.subsidiaries; and direct borrowing from AEP. The AEP System Utility Money Pool operates in accordance with the terms and conditions of the AEP System Utility Money Poolits agreement filed with the FERC. The amounts of outstanding loans to (borrowings from) the Utility Money Pool as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are included in Advances to Affiliates and Advances from Affiliates, respectively, on each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets. The Utility Money Pool participants’ money pool activity and their corresponding authorized borrowing limits for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 are described in the following table:
MaximumAverageNet Loans to
BorrowingsMaximumBorrowingsAverage(Borrowings from)Authorized
from theLoans to thefrom theLoans to thethe Utility MoneyShort-term
UtilityUtilityUtilityUtilityPool as ofBorrowing
CompanyMoney PoolMoney PoolMoney PoolMoney PoolJune 30, 2023Limit
 (in millions)
AEP Texas$477.5 $— $279.9 $— $(135.9)$500.0 
AEPTCo471.3 309.4 153.1 85.9 26.9 820.0 (a)
APCo388.6 19.8 295.0 18.9 (247.2)500.0 
I&M475.3 100.3 174.0 43.0 40.5 500.0 
OPCo485.7 64.7 266.4 40.2 (72.3)500.0 
PSO375.0 121.5 127.5 74.8 (68.1)400.0 
SWEPCo401.6 (b)— 220.6 — (32.6)400.0 
  Maximum   Average   Net Loans to   
  Borrowings Maximum Borrowings Average (Borrowings from) Authorized 
  from the Loans to the from the Loans to the the Utility Money Short-term 
  Utility Utility Utility Utility Pool as of Borrowing 
Company Money Pool Money Pool Money Pool Money Pool September 30, 2017 Limit 
  (in millions) 
AEPTCo $467.2
 $194.8
 $235.7
 $19.3
 $162.9
 $795.0
(a)
APCo 231.5
 160.7
 152.2
 32.2
 (45.9) 600.0
 
I&M 367.4
 12.6
 205.7
 12.6
 (164.9) 500.0
 
OPCo 280.6
 56.2
 141.0
 27.9
 (167.6) 400.0
 
PSO 185.2
 
 121.3
 
 (118.0) 300.0
 
SWEPCo 187.5
 178.6
 109.6
 169.5
 (48.3) 350.0
 


(a)    Amount represents the combined authorized short-term borrowing limit the State Transcos have from FERC or state regulatory commissions.
(a)Amount represents the combined authorized short-term borrowing limit the State Transcos have from FERC or state regulatory commissions.

(b)    SWEPCo’s maximum borrowings from the Utility Money Pool exceeded the authorized short-term borrowing limit by $1.6 million on March 15, 2023. On March 16, 2023, SWEPCo’s borrowings from the Utility Money Pool were reduced below the $400 million authorized limit and borrowings have continued to remain below the authorized limit.

The activity in the above table does not include short-term lending activity of certain AEP nonutility subsidiaries. AEP Texas’ wholly-owned subsidiary, AEP Texas North Generation Company, LLC and SWEPCo’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Mutual Energy SWEPCo, LP, which is a participantLLC participate in the Nonutility Money Pool. The amounts of outstanding loans to the Nonutility Money Pool as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are included in Advances to Affiliates on SWEPCo’sthe subsidiaries’ balance sheets. ForThe Nonutility Money Pool participants’ activity for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, Mutual Energy SWEPCo, LP had2023 is described in the following activity in the Nonutility Money Pool:table:
Maximum Loans Average Loans Loans to the Nonutility
to the Nonutility to the Nonutility Money Pool as of
CompanyMoney PoolMoney PoolJune 30, 2023
(in millions)
AEP Texas$6.9 $6.8 $6.9 
SWEPCo2.2 2.1 2.2 



187

Maximum Average Loans
Loans Loans to the Nonutility
to the Nonutility to the Nonutility Money Pool as of
Money Pool Money Pool September 30, 2017
(in millions)
$2.0
 $2.0
 $2.0


AEP has a direct financing relationship with AEPTCo to meet its short-term borrowing needs. The amounts of outstanding loans to (borrowings from)and borrowings from AEP as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172023 and December 31, 20162022 are included in Advances to Affiliates and Advances from Affiliates, respectively, on AEPTCo’s balance sheets. AEPTCo’s direct borrowing and lending activity with AEP and corresponding authorized borrowing limit for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 is2023 are described in the following table:
Maximum Maximum Average Average Borrowings from Loans toAuthorized
Borrowings Loans Borrowings Loans AEP as of AEP as ofShort-term
from AEP to AEP from AEP to AEP June 30, 2023June 30, 2023Borrowing Limit
(in millions)
$29.4 $158.1 $2.9 $70.2 $21.9 $— $50.0 (a)
Maximum Maximum Average Average Borrowings from Loans to Authorized 
Borrowings Loans Borrowings Loans AEP as of AEP as of Short-term 
from AEP to AEP from AEP to AEP September 30, 2017 September 30, 2017 Borrowing Limit 
(in millions) 
$1.1
 $151.9
 $1.1
 $38.9
 $0.9
 $96.1
 $75.0
(a)


(a)(a)    Amount represents the combined authorized short-term borrowing limit the State Transcos have from FERC or state regulatory commissions.




The maximum and minimum interest rates for funds either borrowed from or loaned to the Utility Money Pool were as follows:are summarized in the following table:
 Six Months Ended June 30,
20232022
Maximum Interest Rate5.69 %2.11 %
Minimum Interest Rate4.66 %0.10 %
  Nine Months Ended September 30,
  2017 2016
Maximum Interest Rate 1.49% 0.91%
Minimum Interest Rate 0.92% 0.69%


The average interest rates for funds borrowed from and loaned to the Utility Money Pool are summarized for all Registrant Subsidiaries in the following table:
Average Interest Rate for FundsAverage Interest Rate for Funds
Borrowed from the Utility Money PoolLoaned to the Utility Money Pool
for Six Months Ended June 30,for Six Months Ended June 30,
Company2023202220232022
AEP Texas5.35 %0.90 %— %1.48 %
AEPTCo5.16 %0.93 %5.46 %1.49 %
APCo5.36 %1.08 %5.35 %0.95 %
I&M5.13 %0.92 %5.42 %0.96 %
OPCo5.30 %0.83 %5.60 %1.20 %
PSO5.47 %1.17 %5.11 %0.65 %
SWEPCo5.22 %1.25 %— %0.55 %
  Average Interest Rate Average Interest Rate
  for Funds Borrowed for Funds Loaned
  from the Utility Money Pool for to the Utility Money Pool for
  Nine Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Company 2017 2016 2017 2016
AEPTCo 1.36% 0.82% 1.04% 0.74%
APCo 1.24% 0.78% 1.28% 0.79%
I&M 1.24% 0.73% 1.27% 0.78%
OPCo 1.40% 0.85% 0.98% 0.74%
PSO 1.30% 0.76% % 0.81%
SWEPCo 1.26% 0.79% 0.98% 0.91%


Maximum, minimum and average interest rates for funds loaned to the Nonutility Money Pool are summarized for Mutual Energy SWEPCo, LP in the following table:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
  Maximum Minimum AverageMaximum Minimum Average
  Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest RateInterest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate
  for Funds for Funds for Fundsfor Funds for Funds for Funds
 Loaned to Loaned to Loaned toLoaned to Loaned to Loaned to
 the Nonutility the Nonutility the Nonutilitythe Nonutility the Nonutility the Nonutility
Company Money Pool Money Pool Money PoolMoney Pool Money Pool Money Pool
AEP Texas 5.69 %4.66 %5.35 %2.11 %0.46 %0.98 %
SWEPCo 5.69 %4.66 %5.35 %2.11 %0.46 %0.98 %


188

  Maximum Minimum Average
  Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate
Nine Months for Funds Loaned for Funds Loaned for Funds Loaned
Ended to the Nonutility  to the Nonutility to the Nonutility
September 30,Money Pool Money Pool Money Pool
2017 1.49% % 1.27%
2016 0.91% 0.69% 0.79%


AEPTCo’s maximum, minimum and average interest rates for funds either borrowed from or loaned to AEP are summarized in the following table:

  Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Average Average
  Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate Interest Rate
Nine Months for Funds for Funds for Funds for Funds for Funds for Funds
Ended Borrowed Borrowed Loaned Loaned Borrowed Loaned
September 30, from AEP from AEPto AEP to AEP from AEP to AEP
2017 1.49% 0.92% 1.49% 0.92% 1.27% 1.31%
2016 0.91% 0.69% 0.91% 0.69% 0.80% 0.81%
 MaximumMinimumMaximumMinimumAverageAverage
 Interest RateInterest RateInterest RateInterest RateInterest RateInterest Rate
Six Months for Fundsfor Fundsfor Fundsfor Fundsfor Fundsfor Funds
Ended BorrowedBorrowedLoanedLoanedBorrowedLoaned
June 30, from AEP from AEPto AEP to AEP from AEP to AEP
2023 5.69 %4.53 %5.69 %4.53 %5.27 %5.35 %
2022 2.11 %0.46 %2.11 %0.46 %1.02 %0.89 %




Short-term Debt (Applies to AEP and SWEPCo)


Outstanding short-term debt was as follows:
 June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
OutstandingInterestOutstandingInterest
CompanyType of DebtAmountRate (a)AmountRate (a)
 (dollars in millions)
AEPSecuritized Debt for Receivables (b)$750.0 5.45 %$750.0 4.67 %
AEPCommercial Paper2,238.7 5.50 %2,862.2 4.80 %
AEPTerm Loan500.0 6.08 %— — %
AEPTerm Loan150.0 5.94 %150.0 5.17 %
AEPTerm Loan125.0 5.94 %125.0 5.17 %
AEPTerm Loan100.0 5.94 %100.0 5.23 %
AEPTerm Loan— — %125.0 4.87 %
SWEPCoNotes Payable3.9 7.53 %— — %
AEPTotal Short-term Debt$3,867.6  $4,112.2  
    September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Company Type of Debt 
Outstanding
Amount
 
Interest
Rate (a)
 Outstanding
Amount
 Interest
Rate (a)
    (in millions)   (in millions)  
AEP Securitized Debt for Receivables (b) $750.0
 1.17% $673.0
 0.70%
AEP Commercial Paper 295.0
 1.39% 1,040.0
 1.02%
SWEPCo Notes Payable 14.3
 2.88% 
 %
  Total Short-term Debt $1,059.3
  
 $1,713.0
  


(a)Weighted-average rate as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.
(a)Weighted average rate.
(b)Amount of securitized debt for receivables as accounted for under the “Transfers and Servicing” accounting guidance.

(b)Amount of securitized debt for receivables as accounted for under the “Transfers and Servicing” accounting guidance.

Credit Facilities


For a discussion of credit facilities, see “Letters of Credit” section of Note 5.


Securitized Accounts Receivables – AEP Credit (Applies to AEP)


AEP Credit has a receivables securitization agreement with bank conduits. Under the securitization agreement, AEP Credit receives financing from the bank conduits for the interest in the receivables AEP Credit acquires from affiliated utility subsidiaries. These securitized transactions allow AEP Credit to repay its outstanding debt obligations, continue to purchase the operating companies’ receivables and accelerate AEP Credit’s cash collections.


AEP Credit’s receivables securitization agreement provides a commitment of $750 million from bank conduits to purchase receivables and expiresincludes a $125 million and a $625 million facility, both of which expire in September 2024. As of June 2019.30, 2023, the affiliated utility subsidiaries were in compliance with all requirements under the agreement.



189


Accounts receivable information for AEP Credit iswas as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2023202220232022
(dollars in millions)
Effective Interest Rates on Securitization of Accounts Receivable5.25 %0.91 %5.06 %0.61 %
Net Uncollectible Accounts Receivable Written-Off$7.3 $6.2 $14.1 $13.6 
  Three Months Ended 
 September 30,
 Nine Months Ended 
 September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (dollars in millions)
Effective Interest Rates on Securitization of Accounts Receivable 1.33% 0.73% 1.17% 0.65%
Net Uncollectible Accounts Receivable Written Off $7.0
 $7.7
 $18.2
 $17.5

June 30, 2023December 31, 2022
(in millions)
Accounts Receivable Retained Interest and Pledged as Collateral Less Uncollectible Accounts$1,184.9 $1,167.7 
Short-term – Securitized Debt of Receivables750.0 750.0 
Delinquent Securitized Accounts Receivable49.4 44.2 
Bad Debt Reserves Related to Securitization41.7 39.7 
Unbilled Receivables Related to Securitization392.4 360.9 
  September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  (in millions)
Accounts Receivable Retained Interest and Pledged as Collateral Less Uncollectible Accounts $939.8
 $945.0
Short-term – Securitized Debt of Receivables 750.0
 673.0
Delinquent Securitized Accounts Receivable 44.3
 42.7
Bad Debt Reserves Related to Securitization 27.8
 27.7
Unbilled Receivables Related to Securitization 264.2
 322.1


AEP Credit’s delinquent customer accounts receivable represent accounts greater than 30 days past due.




Securitized Accounts Receivables – AEP Credit (Applies to all Registrant Subsidiaries except AEP Texas and AEPTCo)


Under this sale of receivables arrangement, the Registrant Subsidiaries sell, without recourse, certain of their customer accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenue balances to AEP Credit and are charged a fee based on AEP Credit’s financing costs, administrative costs and uncollectible accounts experience for each Registrant Subsidiary’s receivables. APCo does not have regulatory authority to sell its West Virginia accounts receivable. KPCo ceased selling accounts receivable to AEP Credit in the first quarter of 2022, based on the expected sale to Liberty. As a result, in the first quarter of 2022, KPCo recorded an allowance for uncollectible accounts on its balance sheet for those receivables no longer sold to AEP Credit. The costs of customer accounts receivable sold are reported in Other Operation expense on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ statements of income. The Registrant Subsidiaries manage and service their customer accounts receivable, which are sold to AEP Credit. AEP Credit securitizes the eligible receivables for the operating companies and retains the remainder.


The amount of accounts receivable and accrued unbilled revenues under the sale of receivables agreement for each Registrant Subsidiary was as follows:agreements were:
CompanyJune 30, 2023December 31, 2022
 (in millions)
APCo$181.9 $194.4 
I&M177.3 166.9 
OPCo477.4 478.6 
PSO177.8 155.5 
SWEPCo191.6 194.0 
Company September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
  (in millions)
APCo $116.9
 $142.0
I&M 132.7
 136.7
OPCo 356.3
 388.3
PSO 143.4
 110.4
SWEPCo 167.1
 130.9


The fees paid by the Registrant Subsidiaries to AEP Credit for customer accounts receivable sold were:
 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
Company2023202220232022
 (in millions)
APCo$4.3 $1.5 $9.2 $2.8 
I&M3.9 2.0 7.8 3.7 
OPCo7.6 7.5 14.9 14.9 
PSO3.5 1.3 6.7 2.2 
SWEPCo4.4 1.5 8.7 2.8 


190


  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Company 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
APCo $1.5
 $1.6
 $4.2
 $5.4
I&M 1.8
 2.0
 4.9
 5.6
OPCo 6.1
 8.1
 16.5
 23.4
PSO 2.0
 1.8
 5.2
 4.7
SWEPCo 2.0
 2.1
 5.4
 5.3

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ proceeds on the sale of receivables to AEP Credit were:
 Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
Company2023202220232022
(in millions)
APCo$414.9 $339.0 $921.1 $754.5 
I&M497.2 502.4 1,022.6 1,015.8 
OPCo783.9 693.3 1,668.3 1,409.9 
PSO460.2 428.5 876.5 791.9 
SWEPCo460.5 437.2 898.1 831.7 
191
  Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Company 2017 2016 2017 2016
  (in millions)
APCo $335.5
 $361.7
 $1,029.4
 $1,071.6
I&M 409.9
 448.0
 1,218.9
 1,220.2
OPCo 616.3
 750.9
 1,741.7
 2,011.2
PSO 407.0
 390.6
 1,022.6
 971.9
SWEPCo 455.0
 460.4
 1,200.8
 1,183.9




13. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The disclosures in this note apply to AEP unless indicated otherwise.

The accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities” is a consolidation model that considers if a company has a variable interest in a VIE.  A VIE is a legal entity that possesses any of the following conditions: the entity’s equity at risk is not sufficient to permit the legal entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, equity owners are unable to direct the activities that most significantly impact the legal entity’s economic performance (or they possess disproportionate voting rights in relation to the economic interest in the legal entity), or the equity owners lack the obligation to absorb the legal entity’s expected losses or the right to receive the legal entity’s expected residual returns. Entities are required to consolidate a VIE when it is determined that they have a controlling financial interest in a VIE and therefore, are the primary beneficiary of that VIE, as defined by the accounting guidance for “Variable Interest Entities.” In determining whether AEP is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, management considers whether AEP has the power to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and is obligated to absorb losses or receive the expected residual returns that are significant to the VIE.

AEP holds ownership interests in businesses with varying ownership structures. AEP has not provided material financial or other support that was not previously contractually required to any of its consolidated VIEs. If an entity is determined not to be a VIE, or if the entity is determined to be a VIE and AEP is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary, the entity is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

Consolidated Variable Interests Entities

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes a detailed discussion of the Registrants’ consolidated VIEs. There were no reconsideration events with respect to those VIEs in the second quarter of 2023.

The balances below represent the assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs. These balances include intercompany transactions that are eliminated upon consolidation.

American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Variable Interest Entities
June 30, 2023
Registrant Subsidiaries
SWEPCo
Sabine
I&M
DCC Fuel
AEP Texas Transition FundingAEP Texas Restoration FundingAPCo
Appalachian
Consumer
Rate
Relief Funding
(in millions)
ASSETS
Current Assets$5.8 $72.5 $26.9 $25.4 $13.3 
Net Property, Plant and Equipment— 129.3— — — 
Other Noncurrent Assets129.763.6109.5(a)157.2 (b)151.8(c)
Total Assets$135.5 $265.4 $136.4 $182.6 $165.1 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities$19.8 $72.4 $74.5 $36.7 $29.6 
Noncurrent Liabilities115.6193.057.5144.7133.6
Equity0.1— 4.41.21.9
Total Liabilities and Equity$135.5 $265.4 $136.4 $182.6 $165.1 

(a)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $12 million.
(b)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $7 million.
(c)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $2 million.
192


American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Variable Interest Entities
June 30, 2023
Other Consolidated VIEs
AEP CreditProtected
Cell
of EIS
Transource Energy
(in millions)
ASSETS
Current Assets$1,186.0 $195.1 $29.3 
Net Property, Plant and Equipment— — 496.6
Other Noncurrent Assets9.4 — 5.3
Total Assets$1,195.4 $195.1 $531.2 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities$1,132.8 $39.7 $21.1 
Noncurrent Liabilities0.981.9 232.0
Equity61.7 73.5 278.1
Total Liabilities and Equity$1,195.4 $195.1 $531.2 

Apple Blossom, Black Oak, Santa Rita East and Dry Lake are consolidated VIEs included in the plan of sale of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio. See the “Planned Disposition of the Competitive Contracted Renewables Portfolio” section of Note 6 for the assets and liabilities classified Held for Sale as of June 30, 2023 inclusive of the assets and liabilities of the aforementioned consolidated VIEs.

American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Variable Interest Entities
December 31, 2022
Registrant Subsidiaries
SWEPCo
Sabine
I&M
DCC Fuel
AEP Texas Transition FundingAEP Texas Restoration FundingAPCo
Appalachian
Consumer
Rate
Relief Funding
(in millions)
ASSETS
Current Assets$108.3 $90.2 $27.0 $21.1 $13.5 
Net Property, Plant and Equipment7.2 179.1 — — — 
Other Noncurrent Assets130.0 94.0 140.9 (a)168.8 (b)164.6 (c)
Total Assets$245.5 $363.3 $167.9 $189.9 $178.1 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities$25.4 $90.0 $73.2 $31.3 $29.3 
Noncurrent Liabilities219.4 273.3 90.4 157.4 146.9 
Equity0.7 — 4.3 1.2 1.9 
Total Liabilities and Equity$245.5 $363.3 $167.9 $189.9 $178.1 

(a)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $16 million.
(b)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $7 million.
(c)Includes an intercompany item eliminated in consolidation of $2 million.




193


American Electric Power Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Variable Interest Entities
December 31, 2022
Other Consolidated VIEs
AEP CreditProtected
Cell
of EIS
Transource EnergyApple Blossom and Black OakSanta Rita EastDry Lake
(in millions)
ASSETS
Current Assets$1,181.0 $194.5 $23.5 $8.3 $21.3 $4.0 
Net Property, Plant and Equipment— — 482.3 216.5 421.6 142.6 
Other Noncurrent Assets9.0 0.3 2.7 13.6 0.1 0.3 
Total Assets$1,190.0 $194.8 $508.5 $238.4 $443.0 $146.9 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities$1,087.8 $46.4 $22.8 $4.5 $9.6 $1.0 
Noncurrent Liabilities0.9 79.1 218.6 5.4 7.3 0.7 
Equity101.3 69.3 267.1 228.5 426.1 145.2 
Total Liabilities and Equity$1,190.0 $194.8 $508.5 $238.4 $443.0 $146.9 

Significant Variable Interests in Non-Consolidated VIEs and Significant Equity Method Investments

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 includes a detailed discussion of significant variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and other significant equity method investments. There were no reconsideration events or material changes in carrying values as of June 30, 2023.


194


14. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The disclosures in this note apply to all Registrants, unless indicated otherwise.

Disaggregated Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The tables below represent AEP’s reportable segment revenues from contracts with customers, net of respective provisions for refund, by type of revenue:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & MarketingCorporate and OtherReconciling AdjustmentsAEP Consolidated
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$962.0 $574.1 $— $— $— $— $1,536.1 
Commercial Revenues642.7 358.3 — — — — 1,001.0 
Industrial Revenues698.9 152.1 — — — (0.1)850.9 
Other Retail Revenues58.9 12.3 — — — — 71.2 
Total Retail Revenues2,362.5 1,096.8 — — — (0.1)3,459.2 
Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues:
Generation Revenues141.4 — — 19.6 — 0.1 161.1 
Transmission Revenues (a)113.5 184.1 455.8 — — (402.8)350.6 
Renewable Generation Revenues (b)— — — 33.1 — (3.1)30.0 
Retail, Trading and Marketing Revenues (b)— — — 407.7 1.2 (10.1)398.8 
Total Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues254.9 184.1 455.8 460.4 1.2 (415.9)940.5 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (c)61.9 56.1 4.3 6.2 28.6 (39.9)117.2 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers2,679.3 1,337.0 460.1 466.6 29.8 (455.9)4,516.9 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (b) (d)(4.9)(2.9)(1.5)— — (6.3)(15.6)
Other Revenues (b) (e)0.1 6.1 — (135.2)2.2 (2.0)(128.8)
Total Other Revenues(4.8)3.2 (1.5)(135.2)2.2 (8.3)(144.4)
Total Revenues$2,674.5 $1,340.2 $458.6 $331.4 $32.0 $(464.2)$4,372.5 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEP Transmission Holdco was $360 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Corporate and Other was $26 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(e)Generation & Marketing includes economic hedge activity.
195


Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & MarketingCorporate and OtherReconciling AdjustmentsAEP Consolidated
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$979.3 $561.6 $— $— $— $— $1,540.9 
Commercial Revenues624.8 331.7 — — — — 956.5 
Industrial Revenues641.8 162.5 — — — — 804.3 
Other Retail Revenues52.9 12.8 — — — — 65.7 
Total Retail Revenues2,298.8 1,068.6 — — — — 3,367.4 
Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues:
Generation Revenues188.3 — — 83.0 — 0.1 271.4 
Transmission Revenues (a)108.8 164.9 421.6 — — (332.0)363.3 
Renewable Generation Revenues (b)— — — 38.2 — (2.9)35.3 
Retail, Trading and Marketing Revenues (b)— — — 408.3 1.3 (2.3)407.3 
Total Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues297.1 164.9 421.6 529.5 1.3 (337.1)1,077.3 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (c)49.2 65.9 0.2 1.6 20.9 (21.1)116.7 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers2,645.1 1,299.4 421.8 531.1 22.2 (358.2)4,561.4 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (b) (d)3.3 (4.6)(43.0)— — (13.1)(57.4)
Other Revenues (b) (e)0.1 6.8 — 128.5 2.3 (2.0)135.7 
Total Other Revenues3.4 2.2 (43.0)128.5 2.3 (15.1)78.3 
Total Revenues$2,648.5 $1,301.6 $378.8 $659.6 $24.5 $(373.3)$4,639.7 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEP Transmission Holdco was $334 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Vertically Integrated Utilities was $5 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(e)Generation & Marketing includes economic hedge activity.

196


Three Months Ended June 30, 2023
AEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$144.9 $— $324.8 $185.2 $429.3 $186.5 $185.1 
Commercial Revenues100.6 — 163.6 141.4 257.8 131.7 153.8 
Industrial Revenues35.2 — 192.5 155.9 116.8 107.8 110.6 
Other Retail Revenues8.7 — 25.2 1.2 3.6 28.3 2.6 
Total Retail Revenues289.4 — 706.1 483.7 807.5 454.3 452.1 
Wholesale Revenues:
Generation Revenues (a)— — 64.2 63.5 — 4.3 43.9 
Transmission Revenues (b)163.1 444.7 43.9 9.6 21.0 9.9 38.3 
Total Wholesale Revenues163.1 444.7 108.1 73.1 21.0 14.2 82.2 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (c)10.7 4.1 11.8 45.0 45.5 7.2 7.0 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers463.2 448.8 826.0 601.8 874.0 475.7 541.3 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (d) (e)(2.0)(3.9)0.5 (2.6)(0.9)(1.0)(3.5)
Other Revenues (e)— — — — 6.0 — — 
Total Other Revenues(2.0)(3.9)0.5 (2.6)5.1 (1.0)(3.5)
Total Revenues$461.2 $444.9 $826.5 $599.2 $879.1 $474.7 $537.8 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for APCo was $38 million primarily related to the PPA with KGPCo.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEPTCo was $357 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for I&M was $17 million primarily related to barging, urea transloading and other transportation services. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(e)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
197


Three Months Ended June 30, 2022
AEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$174.9 $— $313.2 $195.2 $386.7 $185.2 $188.6 
Commercial Revenues110.6 — 152.6 138.6 221.1 121.2 146.0 
Industrial Revenues36.6 — 161.9 160.0 126.0 92.5 97.1 
Other Retail Revenues9.5 — 20.2 1.2 3.4 25.8 4.4 
Total Retail Revenues331.6 — 647.9 495.0 737.2 424.7 436.1 
Wholesale Revenues:
Generation Revenues (a)— — 63.5 94.2 — 0.3 57.4 
Transmission Revenues (b)143.8 406.1 40.8 8.7 21.1 9.1 39.3 
Total Wholesale Revenues143.8 406.1 104.3 102.9 21.1 9.4 96.7 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (c)5.6 0.2 20.6 25.8 60.2 9.6 6.0 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers481.0 406.3 772.8 623.7 818.5 443.7 538.8 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (d) (e)(2.2)(41.9)0.8 7.3 (2.4)(0.8)(2.2)
Other Revenues (e)— — — — 6.8 — — 
Total Other Revenues(2.2)(41.9)0.8 7.3 4.4 (0.8)(2.2)
Total Revenues$478.8 $364.4 $773.6 $631.0 $822.9 $442.9 $536.6 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for APCo was $42 million primarily related to the PPA with KGPCo.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEPTCo was $330 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for I&M was $19 million primarily related to barging, urea transloading and other transportation services. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(e)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.


198


Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & MarketingCorporate and OtherReconciling AdjustmentsAEP Consolidated
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$2,132.4 $1,230.9 $— $— $— $— $3,363.3 
Commercial Revenues1,276.1 734.2 — — — — 2,010.3 
Industrial Revenues (a)1,369.2 365.0 — — — (0.3)1,733.9 
Other Retail Revenues115.7 24.4 — — — — 140.1 
Total Retail Revenues4,893.4 2,354.5 — — — (0.3)7,247.6 
Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues:
Generation Revenues324.2 — — 52.0 — 0.1 376.3 
Transmission Revenues (b)228.2 348.3 905.9 — — (804.6)677.8 
Renewable Generation Revenues (a)— — — 54.4 — (3.2)51.2 
Retail, Trading and Marketing Revenues (c)— — — 821.4 0.9 (10.0)812.3 
Total Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues552.4 348.3 905.9 927.8 0.9 (817.7)1,917.6 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (d)94.5 98.9 7.9 6.8 58.0 (83.6)182.5 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers5,540.3 2,801.7 913.8 934.6 58.9 (901.6)9,347.7 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (a) (e)(8.0)(14.5)0.3 — — (3.4)(25.6)
Other Revenues (a) (f)— 17.2 — (276.2)3.2 (2.9)(258.7)
Total Other Revenues(8.0)2.7 0.3 (276.2)3.2 (6.3)(284.3)
Total Revenues$5,532.3 $2,804.4 $914.1 $658.4 $62.1 $(907.9)$9,063.4 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEP Transmission Holdco was $712 million. The affiliated revenue for Vertically Integrated Utilities was $80 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Generation & Marketing was $10 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Corporate and Other was $55 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(e)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(f)Generation & Marketing includes economic hedge activity.


199


Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
Vertically Integrated UtilitiesTransmission and Distribution UtilitiesAEP Transmission HoldcoGeneration & MarketingCorporate and OtherReconciling AdjustmentsAEP Consolidated
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$2,130.1 $1,162.2 $— $— $— $— $3,292.3 
Commercial Revenues1,197.7 621.4 — — — — 1,819.1 
Industrial Revenues1,204.8 295.8 — — — (0.4)1,500.2 
Other Retail Revenues100.3 24.4 — — — — 124.7 
Total Retail Revenues4,632.9 2,103.8 — — — (0.4)6,736.3 
Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues:
Generation Revenues375.5 — — 123.3 — 0.1 498.9 
Transmission Revenues (a)214.1 319.8 836.1 — — (693.8)676.2 
Renewable Generation Revenues (b)— — — 60.6 — (3.7)56.9 
Retail, Trading and Marketing Revenues (c)— — — 797.1 4.5 (11.3)790.3 
Total Wholesale and Competitive Retail Revenues589.6 319.8 836.1 981.0 4.5 (708.7)2,022.3 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (d)110.8 119.7 — 10.2 34.8 (39.7)235.8 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers5,333.3 2,543.3 836.1 991.2 39.3 (748.8)8,994.4 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Programs (b) (e)2.5 (8.0)(45.9)— — (11.8)(63.2)
Other Revenues (b) (f)0.1 13.1 — 287.7 5.1 (4.9)301.1 
Total Other Revenues2.6 5.1 (45.9)287.7 5.1 (16.7)237.9 
Total Revenues$5,335.9 $2,548.4 $790.2 $1,278.9 $44.4 $(765.5)$9,232.3 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEP Transmission Holdco was $661 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Generation & Marketing was $11 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for Corporate and Other was $19 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(e)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(f)Generation & Marketing includes economic hedge activity.

200


Six Months Ended June 30, 2023
AEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$275.6 $— $795.3 $424.8 $955.3 $357.4 $361.0 
Commercial Revenues197.9 — 334.9 280.3 536.3 240.8 297.3 
Industrial Revenues (a)74.5 — 378.3 308.5 290.4 206.1 214.8 
Other Retail Revenues17.0 — 51.4 2.5 7.4 52.5 5.2 
Total Retail Revenues565.0 — 1,559.9 1,016.1 1,789.4 856.8 878.3 
Wholesale Revenues:
Generation Revenues (b)— — 144.4 167.5 — 5.2 83.5 
Transmission Revenues (c)309.4 883.4 85.3 17.7 38.9 21.2 81.2 
Total Wholesale Revenues309.4 883.4 229.7 185.2 38.9 26.4 164.7 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (d)20.4 7.8 24.8 66.4 78.7 9.5 14.9 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers894.8 891.2 1,814.4 1,267.7 1,907.0 892.7 1,057.9 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Program (a) (e)(4.1)(4.7)(0.2)(5.5)(10.4)(1.0)(4.2)
Other Revenues (a)— — — — 17.1 — — 
Total Other Revenues(4.1)(4.7)(0.2)(5.5)6.7 (1.0)(4.2)
Total Revenues$890.7 $886.5 $1,814.2 $1,262.2 $1,913.7 $891.7 $1,053.7 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for APCo was $85 million primarily relating to the PPA with KGPCo. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEPTCo was $706 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for I&M was $35 million primarily relating to barging, urea transloading and other transportation services. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(e)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
201


Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
AEP TexasAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
(in millions)
Retail Revenues:
Residential Revenues$316.8 $— $771.2 $427.0 $845.4 $351.1 $364.5 
Commercial Revenues205.5 — 306.5 265.2 415.8 218.7 276.5 
Industrial Revenues67.2 — 315.7 296.5 228.7 171.1 181.8 
Other Retail Revenues17.7 — 40.8 2.5 6.7 47.0 6.8 
Total Retail Revenues607.2 — 1,434.2 991.2 1,496.6 787.9 829.6 
Wholesale Revenues:
Generation Revenues (a)— — 119.7 184.6 — 9.8 118.6 
Transmission Revenues (b)276.9 806.4 81.9 17.5 42.9 18.7 74.5 
Total Wholesale Revenues276.9 806.4 201.6 202.1 42.9 28.5 193.1 
Other Revenues from Contracts with Customers (c)14.9 (0.1)44.9 55.7 104.8 15.0 11.3 
Total Revenues from Contracts with Customers899.0 806.3 1,680.7 1,249.0 1,644.3 831.4 1,034.0 
Other Revenues:
Alternative Revenue Program (d) (e)(3.5)(41.5)0.1 7.3 (4.5)(0.9)(2.6)
Other Revenues (e)— — 0.1 (0.1)13.1 — — 
Total Other Revenues(3.5)(41.5)0.2 7.2 8.6 (0.9)(2.6)
Total Revenues$895.5 $764.8 $1,680.9 $1,256.2 $1,652.9 $830.5 $1,031.4 

(a)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for APCo was $78 million primarily relating to the PPA with KGPCo.
(b)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for AEPTCo was $653 million. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(c)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues. The affiliated revenue for I&M was $29 million primarily relating to barging, urea transloading and other transportation services. The remaining affiliated amounts were immaterial.
(d)Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over/under collection of related revenues.
(e)Amounts include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.

Fixed Performance Obligations (Applies to AEP, APCo and I&M)

The following table represents the Registrants’ remaining fixed performance obligations satisfied over time as of June 30, 2023. Fixed performance obligations primarily include electricity sales for fixed amounts of energy and stand ready services into PJM’s RPM market. The Registrants elected to apply the exemption to not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected term of one year or less. Due to the annual establishment of revenue requirements, transmission revenues are excluded from the table below. The Registrant Subsidiaries amounts shown in the table below include affiliated and nonaffiliated revenues.
Company20232024-20252026-2027After 2027Total
(in millions)
AEP$43.6 $161.4 $137.1 $60.9 $403.0 
APCo8.1 32.2 25.4 11.6 77.3 
I&M2.2 8.8 8.8 4.5 24.3 


202


Contract Assets and Liabilities

Contract assets are recognized when the Registrants have a right to consideration that is conditional upon the occurrence of an event other than the passage of time, such as future performance under a contract. The Registrants did not have material contract assets as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

When the Registrants receive consideration, or such consideration is unconditionally due from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of a sales contract, they recognize a contract liability on the balance sheets in the amount of that consideration. Revenue for such consideration is subsequently recognized in the period or periods in which the remaining performance obligations in the contract are satisfied. The Registrants’ contract liabilities typically arise from services provided under joint use agreements for utility poles. The Registrants did not have material contract liabilities as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

Accounts Receivable from Contracts with Customers

Accounts receivable from contracts with customers are presented on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets within the Accounts Receivable - Customers line item. The Registrant Subsidiaries’ balances for receivables from contracts that are not recognized in accordance with the accounting guidance for “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” included in Accounts Receivable - Customers were not material as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. See “Securitized Accounts Receivable - AEP Credit” section of Note 12 for additional information.

The following table represents the amount of affiliated accounts receivable from contracts with customers included in Accounts Receivable - Affiliated Companies on the Registrant Subsidiaries’ balance sheets:
CompanyJune 30, 2023December 31, 2022
(in millions)
AEP Texas$— $0.1 
AEPTCo123.1 113.8 
APCo68.1 64.5 
I&M47.3 75.3 
OPCo68.6 49.9 
PSO30.6 18.8 
SWEPCo42.4 19.1 

203


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


During the thirdsecond quarter of 2017,2023, management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of each of the Registrants, evaluated the Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as controls and other procedures of the Registrants that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrants in the reports that they file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrants in the reports that they file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Registrants’ management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2023, these officers concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures in place are effective and provide reasonable assurance that the disclosure controls and procedures accomplished their objectives.


There was no change in the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the thirdsecond quarter of 20172023 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants’ internal control over financial reporting.

204





PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.  Legal Proceedings


For a discussion of material legal proceedings, see “Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies,” of Note 5incorporated herein by reference.


Item 1A.  Risk Factors


The AEP 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K andfor the AEPTCo 2016 Annual Report included within AEPTCo’s Registration Statementyear ended December 31, 2022 includes a detailed discussion of risk factors. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, there have been no material changes to2023, the risk factors previously disclosed in AEPTCo’s Registration Statement. As of September 30, 2017, the risk factor appearing in AEP’s 20162022 Annual Report under the heading set forth below isare supplemented and updated as follows:


AEP is exposed to nuclear generation risk.Our financial position may be adversely impacted if announced dispositions do not occur as planned or if assets under strategic evaluation lose value. (Applies to AEP)

In February 2022, AEP and I&M)

Through I&M, AEP ownsannounced the Cook Plant.  It consistsinitiation of two nuclear generating units for a rated capacity of 2,278 MWs,process to sell all or about 7% of the generating capacity in the AEP System.  AEP and I&M are, therefore, subject to the risks of nuclear generation, which include the following:

The potential harmful effects on the environment and human health due to an adverse incident/event resulting from the operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling and disposal of radioactive materials such as spent nuclear fuel.
Limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with nuclear operations.
Uncertainties with respect to contingencies and assessment amounts triggered by a loss event (federal law requires owners of nuclear units to purchase the maximum available amount of nuclear liability insurance and potentially contribute to the coverage for losses of others).
Uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives.
Uncertainties related to reliance on a vendor for manufacturing nuclear fuel and for providing specialized engineering services and parts.

There can be no assurance that I&M’s preparations or risk mitigation measures will be adequate if these risks are triggered.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities.  In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines or shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved.  Revised safety requirements promulgated by the NRC could necessitate substantial capital expenditures at nuclear plants.  In addition, although management has no reason to anticipate a serious nuclear incident at the Cook Plant, if an incident did occur, it could harm results of operations or financial condition.  A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to limit or prohibit the operation or licensing of any domestic nuclear unit.  Moreover, a major incident at any nuclear facility in the U.S. could require AEP or I&M to make material contributory payments.

Costs associated with the operation (including fuel), maintenance and retirement of nuclear plants continue to be more significant and less predictable than costs associated with other sources of generation, in large part due to changing regulatory requirements and safety standards, availability of nuclear waste disposal facilities and experience gained in the operation of nuclear facilities.  Costs also may include replacement power, any unamortized investment at the end of the useful life of the Cook Plant (whether scheduled or premature), the carrying costs of that investment and retirement costs.  The ability to obtain adequate and timely recovery of costs associated with the Cook Plant is not assured.


Westinghouse and I&M have a number of significant ongoing contracts relating to reactor services, nuclear fuel fabrication, and ongoing engineering projects. The most significant of these relate to Cook Plant fuel fabrication. In March 2017, Westinghouse filed a petition to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. It intends to reorganize, not cease business operations. However, it is in the early stages of the bankruptcy process and it is unclear whether the company can successfully reorganize. In the event Westinghouse rejects I&M’s contracts, or is unable to reorganize or sell its profitable businesses in the bankruptcy, Cook Plant’s operations would be significantly impacted and potentially shut down temporarily as I&M seeks other vendors for these services.

AEP’s transmission investment strategy and execution bears certain risks associated with these activities. (Applies to all Registrants)

Management expects that a growing portion of AEP Renewables’ competitive contracted renewables portfolio within the Generation & Marketing segment. In February 2023, AEP’s earnings inBoard of Directors approved management’s plan to sell the future will be derived from transmission investmentscompetitive contracted renewables portfolio and activities.  FERC policy currently favorsAEP signed an agreement to sell the expansion and updatingcompetitive contracted renewables portfolio to a nonaffiliated party for $1.5 billion including the assumption of the transmission infrastructure within its jurisdiction.  If the FERC were to adopt a different policy, if states were to limit or restrict such policies, or if transmission needs do not continue or develop as projected, AEP’s strategy of investing in transmission could be impacted.  Management believes AEP’s experience with transmission facilities construction and operation gives AEP an advantage over other competitors in securing authorization to install, construct and operate new transmission lines and facilities.  However, there can be no assurance that PJM, SPP or other RTOs will authorize new transmission projects or will award such projects to AEP.project debt.


In October 2016, several parties filed2022, AEP initiated a strategic evaluation for its ownership in AEP Energy. In April 2023, management completed the strategic evaluation of AEP Energy and initiated a sale process. In April 2023, AEP also made a decision to include AEP Onsite Partners in the sale process. AEP Onsite Partners also owns a 50% interest in NM Renewable Development, LLC, (NMRD). Separate from the remainder of AEP Onsite Partners, AEP and the joint owner have agreed to initiate a joint complaint withsales process for their respective interests in NMRD.

In July 2023, AEP made a decision to initiate a sales process for its investment in Pioneer Transmission, LLC and Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC.

Any planned sale of assets and investments, including subsidiaries, may not occur for any number of reasons beyond our control, including regulatory approval on terms that are acceptable. Depending on the FERC claiming that the base return on common equity used by eastern AEP affiliates in calculating formula transmission rates under the PJM OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.99% to 8.32%, effective upon the date of the complaint. In June 2017, several parties filed a joint complaint with the FERC that states the base return on common equity used by western AEP affiliates, including the State Transcos that operate in SPP, in calculating formula transmission rates under the SPP OATT is excessive and should be reduced from 10.7% to 8.36%, effective upon the date of the complaint. If the FERC orders revenue reductions as a resultoutcome of these complaints, including refunds from the date each complaint was filed,potential sales, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and impact financial condition.


If the FERC were to lower the rate of return it has authorized for AEP’s transmission investments and facilities, or if one or more states were to successfully limit FERC jurisdiction on recovery of costs on transmission investment and its return, it could reduce future net income and cash flows and negatively impact financial condition.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


None


Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities


None


Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures


The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act) imposes stringent health and safety standards on various mining operations. The Mine Act and its related regulations affect numerous aspects of mining operations, including training of mine personnel, mining procedures, equipment used in mine emergency procedures, mine plans and other matters. SWEPCo, through its ownership of DHLC, a wholly-owned lignite mining subsidiary of SWEPCo, is subject to the provisions of the Mine Act.


The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) requires companies that operate mines to include in their periodic reports filed with the SEC, certain mine safety information covered by the Mine Act. Exhibit 95 “Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit” contains the notices of violation and proposed assessments received by DHLC under the Mine Act for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2023.




205


Item 5.  Other Information


NoneDuring the three months ended June 30, 2023, none of the Company’s directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) adopted, terminated or modified a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933).


206


Item 6.  Exhibits


The documents designated with an (*) below have previously been filed on behalf of the Registrants shown and are incorporated herein by reference to the documents indicated and made a part hereof.
ExhibitDescriptionPreviously Filed as Exhibit to:
AEP‡ File No. 1-3525
4(c)Supplemental Indenture No. 5 between AEP and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Trustee dated June 2, 2023 establishing terms of the Remarketed Junior Subordinated Debentures due 2025.
AEP TEXAS‡  File No. 333-221643
4(b)Company Order and Officer’s Certificate between AEP Texas Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Trustee dated May 24, 2023 establishing terms of the 5.40% Senior Notes, Series M, due 2033.
OPCo‡ File No. 1-6543
4(a)Company Order and Officer’s Certificate between Ohio Power Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as Trustee dated May 10, 2023 establishing terms of the 5.00% Senior Notes, Series S, due 2033.
The exhibits designated with an (X) in the table below are being filed on behalf of the Registrants.
ExhibitDescriptionAEPAEPTCoAEP
Texas
APCoAEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
1210ComputationMutual Termination Agreement dated and effective April 17, 2023 among AEP, AEP Transmission Company and Liberty Utilities Co. terminating the Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 26, 2021 the First Amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of Consolidated RatioSeptember 29, 2022, and the Second Amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of Earnings to Fixed ChargesJanuary 16, 2023.
31(a)Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31(b)Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32(a)Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
32(b)Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
95Mine Safety Disclosures
101.INSXBRL Instance DocumentXXXXXXXThe instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension SchemaXXXXXXXX
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation LinkbaseXXXXXXXX
207


101.DEFExhibitDescriptionAEPAEP
Texas
AEPTCoAPCoI&MOPCoPSOSWEPCo
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseXXXXXXXX
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label LinkbaseXXXXXXXX
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation LinkbaseXXXXXXXX
104Cover Page Interactive Data FileFormatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.

208



SIGNATURE




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  The signature for each undersigned company shall be deemed to relate only to matters having reference to such company and any subsidiaries thereof.




AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.






By: /s/ Joseph M. BuonaiutoKate Sturgess
Joseph M. BuonaiutoKate Sturgess
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer






AEP TEXAS INC.
AEP TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
OHIO POWER COMPANY
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY






By: /s/ Joseph M. BuonaiutoKate Sturgess
Joseph M. BuonaiutoKate Sturgess
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer






Date:  October 26, 2017

July 27, 2023
207
209