United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File No. 001-00123

Brown-Forman Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)



Delaware	61-0143150
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

850 Dixie Highway
Louisville, Kentucky	40210
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(502) 585-1100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	þ		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨
			Emerging growth company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: July 31, ~~2017~~2018



Class A Common Stock ($.15 par value, voting)	~~169,061,063~~169,055,397
Class B Common Stock ($.15 par value, nonvoting)	~~215,209,950~~312,104,114



BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
Index to Quarterly Report Form 10-Q

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1620

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	2634

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2635

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		2736

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2736

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2736

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2736

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	2736

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	2736

Item 5.	Other Information	2736

Item 6.	Exhibits	2837

SIGNATURES		2938

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	July 31,						July 31,
	2016			2017			2017			2018
Sales	$	856		$	929		$	929		$	987
Excise taxes	195			206			206			221
Net sales	661			723			723			766
Cost of sales	208			230			230			243
Gross profit	453			493			493			523
Advertising expenses	82			89			87			98
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	163			161			161			168
Other expense (income), net	(5		)	(1		)	(1		)	(7		)
Operating income	213			244			246			264
Non-operating postretirement expense							2			2
Interest income	1			1			(1		)	(2		)
Interest expense	13			16			16			22
Income before income taxes	201			229			229			242
Income taxes	57			51			51			42
Net income	$	144		$	178		$	178		$	200
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.37		$	0.46		$	0.37		$	0.42
Diluted	$	0.36		$	0.46		$	0.37		$	0.41
Cash dividends per common share:
Declared	$	0.3400		$	0.3650		$	0.292		$	0.316
Paid	$	0.1700		$	0.1825		$	0.146		$	0.158

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	July 31,						July 31,
	2016			2017			2017			2018
Net income	$	144		$	178		$	178		$	200
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Currency translation adjustments	(67		)	34			34			(12		)
Cash flow hedge adjustments	12			(23		)	(23		)	23
Postretirement benefits adjustments	3			3			3			3
Net other comprehensive income (loss)	(52		)	14			14			14
Comprehensive income	$	92		$	192		$	192		$	214

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)


	April 30, 2017			July 31, 2017			April 30, 2018			July 31, 2018
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	182		$	238		$	239		$	211
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 at April 30 and July 31	557			576			639			658
Inventories:
Barreled whiskey	873			895			947			945
Finished goods	186			217			225			270
Work in process	119			117			117			137
Raw materials and supplies	92			108			90			97
Total inventories	1,270			1,337			1,379			1,449
Other current assets	342			352			298			305
Total current assets	2,351			2,503			2,555			2,623
Property, plant and equipment, net	713			719			780			778
Goodwill	753			755			763			755
Other intangible assets	641			661			670			658
Deferred tax assets	16			17			16			16
Other assets	151			147			192			195
Total assets	$	4,625		$	4,802		$	4,976		$	5,025
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	501		$	454		$	581		$	564
Dividends payable	—			70			—			76
Accrued income taxes	9			57			25			52
Short-term borrowings	211			258			215			176
Current portion of long-term debt	249			250
Total current liabilities	970			1,089			821			868
Long-term debt	1,689			1,720			2,341			2,310
Deferred tax liabilities	152			135			85			119
Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits	314			298			191			192
Other liabilities	130			140			222			168
Total liabilities	3,255			3,382			3,660			3,657
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock:
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized; 170,000,000 shares issued at April 30 and July 31)	25			25
Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized; 284,627,000 shares and 217,627,000 shares issued at April 30 and July 31, respectively)	43			33
Class A, voting, $0.15 par value (170,000,000 shares authorized; 170,000,000 shares issued)							25			25
Class B, nonvoting, $0.15 par value (400,000,000 shares authorized; 314,532,000 shares issued)							47			47
Additional paid-in capital	65			47			4			2
Retained earnings	4,470			1,824			1,730			1,767
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	(390		)	(376		)	(378		)	(364		)
Treasury stock, at cost (70,540,000 and 3,356,000 shares at April 30 and July 31, respectively)	(2,843		)	(133		)
Treasury stock, at cost (3,531,000 and 3,372,000 shares at April 30 and July 31, respectively)							(112		)	(109		)
Total stockholders’ equity	1,370			1,420			1,316			1,368
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,625		$	4,802		$	4,976		$	5,025

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in millions)


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	July 31,						July 31,
	2016			2017			2017			2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	144		$	178		$	178		$	200
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization	15			15			15			18
Stock-based compensation expense	4			4			4			5
Deferred income taxes	(11		)	(3		)	(3		)	20
Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding the effects of acquisition of business	(24		)	(92		)
Changes in assets and liabilities							(89		)	(117		)
Cash provided by operating activities	128			102			105			126
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired	(307		)	—
Additions to property, plant, and equipment	(16		)	(28		)	(28		)	(23		)
Computer software expenditures	(1		)	—
Payments for corporate-owned life insurance							(3		)	(2		)
Cash used for investing activities	(324		)	(28		)	(31		)	(25		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net change in short-term borrowings	(43		)	45			45			(41		)
Proceeds from long-term debt	717			—
Debt issuance costs	(5		)	—
Net payments related to exercise of stock-based awards	(3		)	(5		)	(5		)	(4		)
Acquisition of treasury stock	(201		)	(1		)	(1		)	(1		)
Dividends paid	(67		)	(70		)	(70		)	(76		)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities	398			(31		)
Cash used for financing activities							(31		)	(122		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(6		)	13			13			(7		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	196			56
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							56			(28		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	263			182			182			239
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	459		$	238		$	238		$	211

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

In these notes, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Brown-Forman,” and ~~“our”~~the “Company” refer to Brown-Forman ~~Corporation.~~Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, collectively.

1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

We prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim financial information. In accordance with those rules and regulations, we condensed or omitted certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). We suggest that you read these condensed financial statements together with the financial statements and footnotes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2017 (2017 Form 10-K). We prepared the accompanying financial statements on a basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our 2017 Form 10-K.

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments (unless otherwise indicated), necessary for a fair statement of our financial results for the periods covered by this report. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of future or annual results.

~~The BenRiach acquisition occurred during~~We suggest that you read these condensed financial statements together with the ~~first~~financial statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal ~~quarter of 2017 and~~year ended April 30, 2018 (2018 Annual Report). Except for adopting the ~~purchase price allocation was finalized as of June 1, 2017. There have been no material changes to~~new accounting standards discussed below, we prepared the ~~purchase price allocation.~~accompanying financial statements on a basis that is substantially consistent with the accounting principles applied in our 2018 Annual Report.

~~New~~Recently adopted accounting ~~pronouncements to be adopted.~~standards. InAs of May ~~2014,~~1, 2018, we adopted the following Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ~~issued a new revenue recognition standard that,~~:

ASU 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This update, codified along with various amendments ~~issued in 2015 and 2016, will replace substantially all existing~~as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (ASC 606), replaces previous revenue recognition ~~guidance in U.S. GAAP.~~guidance. The core principle of ~~the standard~~ASC 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. ~~The new standard~~ASC 606 also requires ~~significantly~~ more financial statement disclosures than ~~existing~~were required by previous revenue ~~standards do.~~

~~The~~recognition standards. We applied this new ~~standard can be adopted using either of two transition options: a full retrospective transition method or~~guidance on a modified retrospective method. Under the full retrospective method, the guidance would be applied to each prior reporting period presented. Under the modified retrospective method, the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance would be recorded as anbasis through a cumulative-effect adjustment ~~to the opening balance of~~that reduced retained earnings ~~for the annual reporting period that includes the date~~as of ~~initial application.~~

~~We are continuing to assess the potential impact~~May 1, 2018, by $25 million (net of ~~the new guidance on our financial statements. Based on our assessment to date, we currently expect our accounting~~tax). See Note 2 for ~~certain customer incentives to be the area most likely affected by the new recognition requirements. We also expect to disclose~~ additional information about our revenues ~~under~~and the ~~new standard. As we progress in our assessment, we are also identifying~~impact of adopting ASC 606.

ASU 2016-15: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and preparing to make any changes to our accounting policies and practices, systems, processes, and controls that may be required to implement the new standard. We currently expect to choose the modified retrospective method in transitioning to the new standard, which we will adopt effective May 1, 2018.

~~We are also currently evaluating the potential impact on our financial statements of the additional new accounting pronouncements described below:~~

In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard on accounting for leases. Under the new standard, a lessee should recognize on its balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The standard permits an entity to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. The standard, which also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements, will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2020. It is to be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the adoption-period financial statements.

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued~~Cash Payments. This new guidance onaddresses eight specific issues related to the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The impact of adopting the new guidance was limited to a change in our classification of cash payments for premiums on corporate-owned life insurance policies, which ~~addresses eight specific~~we previously reflected in operating activities. Under the new guidance, we classify those payments as investing activities. We retrospectively adjusted prior period cash flow ~~classification issues, is intended~~statements to ~~reduce diversity in practice. It will become effective~~conform to the new classification. As a result, we reclassified payments of $3 million from operating activities to investing activities for ~~us beginning fiscal 2019 and is to be applied retrospectively.~~the three months ended July 31, 2017.

~~In October 2016, the FASB issued~~

ASU 2016-16: Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. This revised guidance ~~that~~ requires the recognition of the income tax consequences (expense or benefit) of an intercompany transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. It maintains

the existing requirement to defer the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intercompany transfer of inventory until the inventory is sold to an outside party. ~~The~~We applied the guidance ~~will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2019 and is to be applied~~ on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment ~~directly to~~that increased retained earnings as of May 1, 2018, by $20 million.

ASU 2017-04: Simplifying the ~~beginning of the period of adoption.~~

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued~~Test for Goodwill Impairment. This updated guidance ~~that~~ eliminates the second step of the ~~existing~~previous two-step quantitative test of goodwill for impairment. Under the new guidance, the quantitative test ~~will consist~~consists of a single step in which the carrying amount of the reporting unit ~~will be~~is compared to its fair value. An impairment charge would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the amount of the impairment would be limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The guidance does not affect the existing option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. ~~It will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2021~~The prospective adoption of the new standard had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-07: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and ~~is to be applied prospectively.~~

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued~~Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This new guidance ~~for~~addresses the presentation of the net periodic cost (NPC) associated with pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The guidance requires the service cost component of the NPC to be reported in the

income statement in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of the NPC are to be presented separately from the service cost and outside of income from operations. In addition, the guidance allows only the service cost component of NPC to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. ~~The~~We applied the guidance ~~will become effective for us beginning fiscal 2019. It is to be applied~~ retrospectively for the presentation in the income statement and prospectively ~~on and after the effective date,~~ for the capitalization of service cost. The retrospective application increased previously-reported operating income by $2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2017. As the retrospective application merely reclassified amounts from operating income to non-operating expense, there was no effect on previously-reported net income or earnings per share.

~~Early application~~New accounting standards to be adopted. The FASB has issued the ASUs described below that we are not required to adopt until May 1, 2019 (although early adoption is permitted). We are currently evaluating their potential impact on our financial statements.

ASU 2016-02: Leases. This update, codified along with various amendments as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842 (ASC 842), replaces existing lease accounting guidance. Under ASC 842, a lessee should recognize on its balance sheet a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. ASC 842 permits an entity to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with a term of ~~any~~12 months or less. It also requires additional quantitative and qualitative disclosures about leasing arrangements. We will adopt ASC 842 as of May 1, 2019, using a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at that date.

ASU 2017-12: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This new guidance is intended to better align hedge accounting with an entity’s risk management activities and improve disclosures about hedges. The guidance expands hedge accounting for financial and nonfinancial risk components, eliminates the ~~new accounting pronouncements described above~~requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness, simplifies the way assessments of hedge effectiveness may be performed, and amends some presentation and disclosure requirements for hedges. It is ~~permitted. Although we~~to be applied using a modified retrospective transition approach for cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. We have not yet determined our plans for adoption, ~~we do not currently expect to apply any~~but are considering the possibility of ~~the~~adopting this new guidance before ~~their effective dates.~~the required adoption date.

ASU 2018-02: Reclassification of Certain Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This new guidance would allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted by the U.S. government in December 2017. It is to be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. We have not yet determined our plans for adoption, but are considering the possibility of adopting this new guidance before the required adoption date.

There are no other new accounting standards to be adopted that we currently believe might have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications. We have reclassified some previously reported expense amounts related to certain marketing research and promotional agency costs to conform to the current year classification. These immaterial reclassifications between advertising expenses and selling, general, and administrative expenses had no impact on net income.

2. ~~Inventories~~Net Sales

Effective May 1, 2018, we updated our policy for recognizing revenue (“net sales”) to reflect the adoption of ASC 606. We describe the updated policy below. Also, we show how the adoption impacted our financial statements and we present disaggregated net sales information in accordance with the new standard.

~~Inventories~~Revenue recognition policy. Our net sales predominantly reflect global sales of beverage alcohol consumer products. We sell these products under contracts with different types of customers, depending on the market. The customer is most often a distributor, wholesaler, or retailer.

Each contract typically includes a single performance obligation to transfer control of the products to the customer. Depending on the contract, control is transferred when the products are ~~valued~~either shipped or delivered to the customer, at which point we recognize the ~~lower~~transaction price for those products as net sales. The transaction price recognized at that point reflects our estimate of the consideration to be received in exchange for the products. The actual amount may ultimately differ due to the effect of various customer incentives and trade promotion activities. In making our estimates, we consider our historical

experience and current expectations, as applicable. Adjustments recognized during the three months ended July 31, 2018, for changes in estimated transaction prices of products sold in prior periods were not material.

Net sales exclude taxes we collect from customers that are imposed by the government on our sales, and are reduced by payments to customers unless made in exchange for distinct goods or services with fair values approximating the payments.

Net sales include any amounts we bill customers for shipping and handling activities related to the products. We recognize the cost of those activities in cost of sales during the same period in which we recognize the related net sales.

Sales returns, which are permitted only in limited situations, are not material.

Customer payment terms generally range from 30 to 90 days. There are no significant amounts of contract assets or ~~market. Some~~liabilities.

Impact of adoption. We adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method. As a result, we recorded an adjustment that decreased retained earnings as of May 1, 2018, by $25 million (net of tax). The adjustment reflects the cumulative effect on that date of applying our updated revenue recognition policy, under which we recognize the cost of certain customer incentives earlier than we did before adopting ASC 606. Although we do not expect this change in timing to have a significant impact on a full-year basis, we do anticipate some change in the pattern of recognition among fiscal quarters. Additionally, some payments to customers that we classified as expenses before adopting the new standard are classified as reductions of net sales under our new policy.

The following table shows how the adoption of ASC 606 impacted our consolidated ~~inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which we use~~statement of operations for the ~~majority~~three months ended July 31, 2018:



	Three Months Ended July 31, 2018
	Under Prior			As Reported Under			Effect of
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	Guidance			ASC 606			Adoption
Sales	$	997		$	987		$	(10	)
Excise taxes	221			221			—
Net sales	776			766			(10		)
Cost of sales	243			243			—
Gross profit	533			523			(10		)
Advertising expenses	101			98			(3		)
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	169			168			(1		)
Other expense (income), net	(7		)	(7		)	—
Operating income	270			264			(6		)
Non-operating postretirement expense	2			2			—
Interest income	(2		)	(2		)	—
Interest expense	22			22			—
Income before income taxes	248			242			(6		)
Income taxes	44			42			(2		)
Net income	$	204		$	200		$	(4	)
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.43		$	0.42		$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	0.42		$	0.41		$	(0.01	)

The following table shows how the adoption of ASC 606 impacted our ~~U.S. inventories. If the LIFO method had not been used, inventories at current cost would have been~~ ~~$272 million~~ ~~higher than reported~~consolidated balance sheet as of ~~April 30, 2017, and $278 million higher than reported as of~~ July 31, ~~2017~~2018:



	As of July 31, 2018
	Under Prior		As Reported Under		Effect of
(Dollars in millions)	Guidance		ASC 606		Adoption
Assets
Other current assets	$	307	$	305	$	(2	)
Deferred tax assets	15		16		1
Total assets	5,026		5,025		(1		)

Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	527	$	564	$	37
Accrued income taxes	53		52		(1		)
Deferred tax liabilities	127		119		(8		)
Total liabilities	3,629		3,657		28

Stockholders’ Equity
Retained earnings	$	1,796	$	1,767	$	(29	)
Total stockholders’ equity	1,397		1,368		(29		)

Disaggregated revenues.

The following table shows our net sales by geography:



	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2017		2018
United States	$	355	$	357
Developed International¹	193		215
Emerging²	123		131
Travel Retail³	30		38
Non-branded and bulk⁴	22		25
Total	$	723	$	766

¹~~. Changes~~Represents sales of branded products to “advanced economies” as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), excluding the United States. Our largest developed international markets are the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany.

²Represents sales of branded products to “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest emerging markets are Mexico and Poland.

³Represents sales of branded products to global duty-free customers, travel retail customers, and the U.S. military regardless of customer location.

⁴Includes sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.

The following table shows our net sales by product category:



	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2017		2018
Whiskey¹	$	557	$	602
Tequila²	58		62
Vodka³	31		26
Wine⁴	42		40
Rest of portfolio	13		11
Non-branded and bulk⁵	22		25
Total	$	723	$	766

¹Includes all whiskey spirits and whiskey-based flavored liqueurs, ready-to-drink, and ready-to-pour products. The brands included in this category are the ~~LIFO valuation reserve for interim periods are based on a proportionate allocation~~Jack Daniel's family of ~~the estimated change for the entire fiscal year.~~brands, Woodford Reserve, Canadian Mist, GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, Old Forester, Early Times, Slane Irish Whiskey, and Coopers' Craft.

²Includes el Jimador, Herradura, New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.

³Includes Finlandia.

⁴Includes Korbel Champagne and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.

⁵Includes sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.

3. Income Taxes

Our consolidated interim effective tax rate is based upon our expected annual operating income, statutory tax rates, and income tax laws in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant or unusual items, including adjustments to accruals for tax uncertainties, are recognized in the quarter in which the related event or a change in judgment occurs. The effective tax rate of ~~22.1%~~17.4% for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, is lower than the expected tax rate of ~~29.0%~~21.1% on ordinary income for the full fiscal year, primarily due to (a) ~~a reduction in~~the impact of the current year adjustment to the provisional repatriation U.S. tax ~~for certain prior years on foreign exchange gains in non-U.S. entities due to a change in method of accounting for U.S. tax purposes,~~charge that was made during fiscal 2018 (discussed below) and (b) the excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation. Our expected tax rate includes current fiscal year additions for existing tax contingency items.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act). The Tax Act significantly revised the future ongoing U.S. corporate income tax by, among other things, lowering U.S. corporate income tax rates and implementing a territorial tax system. As we have an April 30 fiscal year-end, the lower corporate income tax rate was phased in, resulting in a U.S. statutory federal rate of 30.4% for our fiscal year ended April 30, 2018, and 21% for our current and subsequent fiscal years. For the quarter ended July 31, 2018, the impact of the lower tax rate resulted in a tax benefit of approximately $27 million. With the enactment of the Tax Act, we continue to evaluate our global working capital requirements and may change our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.

There are also certain transitional impacts of the Tax Act. As part of the transition to the new territorial tax system, the Tax Act imposed a one-time repatriation tax on deemed repatriation of historical earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the reduction of the U.S. corporate tax rate caused us to adjust our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities to the lower federal base rate of 21%. These transitional impacts resulted in a provisional net charge of $43 million for the year ended April 30, 2018, comprised of a provisional repatriation U.S. tax charge of $91 million and a provisional net deferred tax benefit of $48 million. In the quarter ended July 31, 2018, we recorded a provisional benefit of $6 million as an adjustment to the provisional repatriation charge.

The Tax Act also established new tax laws that impact our financial statements beginning in the current fiscal year. These new laws include, but are not limited to (a) Global Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI), a new provision for tax on low-tax foreign earnings; (b) Base Erosion Anti-abuse Tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (c) Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), a new provision for deductions related to foreign-derived intangibles; (d) repeal of the domestic production activity deduction; and (e) limitations on certain executive compensation. For the quarter ended July 31, 2018, the net impact of these provisions was approximately $2 million of additional tax.

As noted, certain income earned by foreign subsidiaries must be included in U.S. taxable income under the GILTI provisions. The FASB allows an accounting policy election of either recognizing deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or recognizing such taxes as a current period expense when incurred. We have elected to recognize these taxes as a current period expense when incurred.

The changes included in the Tax Act are broad and complex. The final transition impacts of the Tax Act may differ from the current estimates, due to, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act, or any updates or changes to estimates we have used to calculate the transition impacts, including impacts from changes to current year earnings estimates and foreign currency exchange rates. The SEC has issued rules that allow for a measurement period of up to one year after the enactment date of the Tax Act to finalize the recording of the related tax impacts. As of July 31, 2018, the amounts recorded for the Tax Act remain provisional for the one-time repatriation tax and the adjustment to our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities. We will finalize and record any additional adjustments within the allowed measurement period.

4. Earnings Per Share

We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share further includes the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation awards. We calculate that dilutive effect using the “treasury stock method” (as defined by GAAP).

The following table presents information concerning basic and diluted earnings per share:


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	July 31,				July 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2016		2017		2017		2018
Net income available to common stockholders	$	144	$	178	$	178	$	200

Share data (in thousands):
Basic average common shares outstanding	393,018		384,038		480,048		480,964
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards	2,991		2,349		2,936		3,477
Diluted average common shares outstanding	396,009		386,387		482,984		484,441

Basic earnings per share	$	0.37	$	0.46	$	0.37	$	0.42
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.36	$	0.46	$	0.37	$	0.41

We excluded common stock-based awards for approximately ~~1,173,000~~1,719,000 shares and ~~1,375,000~~100,000 shares from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended July 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. We excluded those awards because they were not dilutive for those periods under the treasury stock method.

5.Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Some of our consolidated inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which we use for the majority of our U.S. inventories. If the LIFO method had not been used, inventories at current cost would have been $290 million higher than reported as of April 30, 2018, and $295 million higher than reported as of July 31, 2018. Changes in the LIFO valuation reserve for interim periods are based on a proportionate allocation of the estimated change for the entire fiscal year.

6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table shows the changes in goodwill (which includes no accumulated impairment losses) and other intangible assets during the three months ended July 31, 2018:



(Dollars in millions)	Goodwill			Other Intangible Assets
Balance at April 30, 2018	$	763		$	670
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(8		)	(12		)
Balance at July 31, 2018	$	755		$	658

Our other intangible assets consist of trademarks and brand names, all with indefinite useful lives.

7. Commitments and Contingencies

We operate in a litigious environment, and we are sued in the normal course of business. Sometimes plaintiffs seek substantial damages. Significant judgment is required in predicting the outcome of these suits and claims, many of which take years to adjudicate. We accrue estimated costs for a contingency when we believe that a loss is probable and we can make a reasonable estimate of the loss, and then adjust the accrual as appropriate to reflect changes in facts and circumstances. We do not believe it is reasonably possible that these existing loss contingencies, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. No material accrued loss contingencies are recorded as of July 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

We have guaranteed the repayment by a third-party importer of its obligation under a bank credit facility that it uses in connection with its importation of our products in Russia. If the importer were to default on that obligation, which we believe is unlikely, our maximum possible exposure under the existing terms of the guaranty would be approximately ~~$11~~$10 million (subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates). Both the fair value and carrying amount of the guaranty are insignificant.

As of July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our actual exposure under the guaranty of the importer’s obligation is approximately $5$4 million. We also have accounts receivable from that importer of approximately $4$6 million at July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, which we expect to collect in full.

Based on the financial support we provide to the importer, we believe it meets the definition of a variable interest entity. However, because we do not control this entity, it is not included in our consolidated financial statements.

6.8. Debt

Our long-term debt (net of unamortized discount and issuance costs) consists of:

(Principal and carrying amounts in millions) April 30,
2017 July 31,
2017
1.00% notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2018 $ 249
$ 250
2.25% notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023 248
248
1.20% notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026 324
350
2.60% notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028 383
388
3.75% notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043 248
248
4.50% notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045 486
486
1,938
1,970
Less current portion 249
250
$ 1,689
$ 1,720



(Principal and carrying amounts in millions)	April 30, 2018		July 31, 2018
2.25% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2023	$	248	$	248
3.50% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2025	296		296
1.20% senior notes, €300 principal amount, due July 7, 2026	361		349
2.60% senior notes, £300 principal amount, due July 7, 2028	408		389
4.00% senior notes, $300 principal amount, due April 15, 2038	293		293
3.75% senior notes, $250 principal amount, due January 15, 2043	248		248
4.50% senior notes, $500 principal amount, due July 15, 2045	487		487
	$	2,341	$	2,310

As of April 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our short-term borrowings consisted of ~~$211 million included $208~~$215 million of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of ~~1.04%~~2.04%, and aan average remaining maturity of 2223 days. As of July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our short-term borrowings of ~~$258~~$176 million included ~~$253~~$161 million of commercial paper, with an average interest rate of ~~1.29%~~2.17%, and aan average remaining maturity of 1720 days.

7.9. ~~Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits~~Fair Value Measurements

The following table ~~shows~~summarizes the ~~components of the pension~~assets and ~~other postretirement benefit cost recognized for our U.S. benefit plans. Information about similar international plans is not presented due to immateriality.~~liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:

Three Months Ended
July 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2016 2017
Pension Benefits:

Service cost $ 6
$ 6
Interest cost 9
8
Expected return on plan assets (10 ) (10 )
Amortization of net actuarial loss 6
5
Net cost $ 11
$ 9

Other Postretirement Benefits:

Interest cost $ 1
$ 1
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) (1 ) (1 )
Net cost $ —
$ —



	April 30, 2018				July 31, 2018
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(Dollars in millions)	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	239	$	239	$	211	$	211
Currency derivatives	1		1		5		5
Liabilities
Currency derivatives	39		39		7		7
Short-term borrowings	215		215		176		176
Long-term debt	2,341		2,386		2,310		2,347

8. ~~Fair Value Measurements~~

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We categorize the fair values of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to determine those values. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in inactive markets; or other inputs that are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs ~~that are~~ supported by little or no market activity.

~~The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:~~

(Dollars in millions) Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
April 30, 2017:
Assets:
Currency derivatives $ —
$ 25
$ —
$ 25
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives —
10
—
10
Short-term borrowings —
211
—
211
Current portion of long-term debt —
249
—
249
Long-term debt —
1,752
—
1,752
July 31, 2017:
Assets:
Currency derivatives —
9
—
9
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives —
28
—
28
Short-term borrowings —
258
—
258
Current portion of long-term debt —
250
—
250
Long-term debt —
1,792
—
1,792

We determine the fair values of our currency derivatives (forward contracts) using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models, which are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, include the applicable spot rates, forward rates, and discount rates. The discount rates are based on the historical U.S. Treasury rates. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

~~The fair value of short-term borrowings approximates their carrying amount.~~ We determine the fair value of long-term debt primarily based on the prices at which similar debt has recently traded in the market and also considering the overall market conditions on the date of valuation. These fair value measurements are categorized as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.

The fair values of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments.

We measure some assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. That is, we do not measure them at fair value on an ongoing basis, but we do adjust them to fair value in some circumstances (for example, when we determine that an asset is impaired). No material nonrecurring fair value measurements were required during the periods presented in these financial statements.

9. ~~Fair Value of Financial Instruments~~

The fair value of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term borrowings approximate the carrying amounts due to the short maturities of these instruments. We determine the fair value of currency derivatives and long-term debt as discussed in Note 8.

~~Below is a comparison of the fair values and carrying amounts of these instruments:~~

April 30, 2017 July 31, 2017
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
(Dollars in millions) Amount Value Amount Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 182
$ 182
$ 238
$ 238
Currency derivatives 25
25
9
9
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives 10
10
28
28
Short-term borrowings 211
211
258
258
Current portion of long-term debt 249
249
250
250
Long-term debt 1,689
1,752
1,720
1,792

10. Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Our multinational business exposes us to global market risks, including the effect of fluctuations in currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. We use derivatives to help manage financial exposures that occur in the normal course of business. We formally document the purpose of each derivative contract, which includes linking the contract to the financial exposure it is designed to mitigate. We do not hold or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

We use currency derivative contracts to limit our exposure to the currency exchange risk that we cannot mitigate internally by using netting strategies. We designate most of these contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions (expected to occur within three years). We record all changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges (except any ineffective portion) in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the underlying hedged transaction occurs, at which time we reclassify that amount into earnings. We assess the effectiveness of these hedges based on changes in forward exchange rates. The ineffective portion

of the changes in fair value of our hedges (recognized immediately in earnings) during the periods presented in this report was not material.

We had outstanding currency derivatives, related primarily to our euro, British pound, and Australian dollar exposures, with notional amounts totaling ~~$1,188~~$1,098 million at April 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$1,225~~$1,203 million at July 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

~~During fiscal 2017, we used some currency derivative forward contracts and~~We also use foreign currency-denominated ~~long-term~~ debt to help manage our currency exchange risk. As of July 31, 2018, $606 million of our foreign currency-denominated debt instruments were designated as ~~after-tax~~net investment hedges. These net investment hedges ~~of our~~are intended to mitigate foreign exchange exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries. Any change in value of the designated portion of the hedging instruments is recorded in AOCI, offsetting the foreign currency translation adjustment of the related net investments that is also recorded in AOCI. As of July 31, 2017, $526 million of our foreign currency-denominated debt was designated as a net investment hedge. Our net investment hedges are intended to mitigate foreign exchange exposure related to non-U.S. dollar net investments in certain foreign subsidiaries against changes in foreign exchange rates. There was no ineffectiveness related to our net investment ~~hedges.~~hedges in any of the periods presented.

We do not designate some of our currency derivatives and foreign currency-denominated debt as hedges because we use them to at least partially offset the immediate earnings impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on existing assets or liabilities. We immediately recognize the change in fair value of these instruments in earnings.

We use forward purchase contracts with suppliers to protect against corn price volatility. We expect to physically take delivery of the corn underlying each contract and use it for production over a reasonable period of time. Accordingly, we account for these contracts as normal purchases rather than as derivative instruments.

The following tables present the pre-tax impact that changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments and non-derivative hedging instruments had on AOCI and earnings:


		Three Months Ended							Three Months Ended
		July 31,							July 31,
(Dollars in millions)	Classification	2016			2017			Classification	2017			2018
Derivative Instruments
Currency derivatives designated as cash flow hedges:
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI	n/a	$	29		$	(36	)	n/a	$	(36	)	$	27
Net gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings	Net sales	10			2			Sales	2			(2		)
Currency derivatives designated as net investment hedge:
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI	n/a	8			—
Currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings	Net sales	1			(3		)	Sales	(3		)	3
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings	Other income	(5		)	9			Other income	9			3
Non-Derivative Hedging Instruments
Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as net investment hedge:
Net gain (loss) recognized in AOCI	n/a	(10		)	(16		)	n/a	(16		)	28
Foreign currency-denominated debt not designated as hedging instrument:
Net gain (loss) recognized in earnings	Other income	(1		)	(16		)	Other income	(16		)	4

We expect to reclassify ~~$10~~$2 million of deferred net losses on cash flow hedges recorded in AOCI as of July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, to earnings during the next 12 months. This reclassification would offset the anticipated earnings impact of the underlying hedged exposures. The actual amounts that we ultimately reclassify to earnings will depend on the exchange rates in effect when the underlying hedged transactions occur. As of July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the maximum term of our outstanding derivative contracts was 36 months.

The following table presents the fair values of our derivative instruments:


(Dollars in millions)	Classification	Fair value of derivatives in a gain position		Fair value of derivatives in a loss position			Classification	Fair value of derivatives in a gain position		Fair value of derivatives in a loss position
April 30, 2017:
April 30, 2018
Designated as cash flow hedges:
Currency derivatives	Other current assets	$	21	$	(2	)	Other current assets	$	2	$	(2	)
Currency derivatives	Other assets	9		(4		)	Other assets	1		—
Currency derivatives	Accrued expenses	2		(8		)	Accrued expenses	4		(23		)
Currency derivatives	Other liabilities	1		(4		)	Other liabilities	2		(18		)
Not designated as hedges:
Currency derivatives	Other current assets	2		(1		)	Other current assets	—		—
Currency derivatives	Accrued expenses	—		(1		)	Accrued expenses	1		(5		)
July 31, 2017:
July 31, 2018
Designated as cash flow hedges:
Currency derivatives	Other current assets	8		(7		)	Other current assets	5		(3		)
Currency derivatives	Other assets	2		(1		)	Other assets	7		(5		)
Currency derivatives	Accrued expenses	5		(17		)	Accrued expenses	4		(9		)
Currency derivatives	Other liabilities	3		(22		)	Other liabilities	1		(2		)
Not designated as hedges:
Currency derivatives	Other current assets	7		—			Other current assets	1		—
Currency derivatives	Accrued expenses	4		(1		)	Accrued expenses	—		(1		)

The fair values reflected in the above table are presented on a gross basis. However, as discussed further below, the fair values of those instruments ~~that are~~ subject to net settlement agreements are presented on a net basis in our balance ~~sheets on a net basis.~~sheets.

In our statement of cash flows, we classify cash flows related to cash flow hedges in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged items.

Credit risk. We are exposed to credit-related losses if the counterparties to our derivative contracts default. This credit risk is limited to the fair value of the contracts. To manage this risk, we contract only with major financial institutions that have earned investment-grade credit ratings and with whom we have standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements that allow for net settlement of the derivative contracts. Also, we have established counterparty credit guidelines that are regularly monitored, and we monetize contracts when we believe it is warranted. Because of these safeguards, we believe we have no derivative positions that warrant credit valuation adjustments.

Some of our derivative instruments require us to maintain a specific level of creditworthiness, which we have maintained. If our creditworthiness were to fall below that level, then the counterparties to our derivative instruments could request immediate payment or collateralization for derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with creditworthiness requirements that were in a net liability position was $9$38 million at April 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$26~~$6 million at July 31, ~~2017~~2018.

Offsetting. As noted above, our derivative contracts are governed by ISDA agreements that allow for net settlement of derivative contracts with the same counterparty. It is our policy to present the fair values of current derivatives (i.e., those with a remaining term of 12 months or less) with the same counterparty on a net basis in the balance sheet. Similarly, we present the

fair values of noncurrent derivatives with the same counterparty on a net basis. Current derivatives are not netted with noncurrent derivatives in the balance sheet.

The following table summarizes the gross and net amounts of our derivative contracts:


(Dollars in millions)	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)			Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts			Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets (Liabilities)			Gross Amounts Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts Presented in Balance Sheet			Gross Amounts Not Offset in Balance Sheet			Net Amounts
April 30, 2017:
April 30, 2018
Derivative assets	$	35		$	(10	)	$	25		$	(1	)	$	24		$	10		$	(9	)	$	1		$	(1	)	$	—
Derivative liabilities	(20		)	10			(10		)	1			(9		)	(48		)	9			(39		)	1			(38		)
July 31, 2017:
July 31, 2018
Derivative assets	29			(20		)	9			(2		)	7			18			(13		)	5			(1		)	4
Derivative liabilities	(48		)	20			(28		)	2			(26		)	(20		)	13			(7		)	1			(6		)

No cash collateral was received or pledged related to our derivative contracts as of April 30, ~~2017~~2018 or July 31, ~~2017~~2018.

11. ~~Goodwill~~Pension and Other ~~Intangible Assets~~Postretirement Benefits

The following table ~~summarizes~~shows the ~~changes in goodwill~~components of the net cost of pension and other ~~intangible assets during the three months ended July 31, 2017:~~postretirement benefits recognized for our U.S. benefit plans. Information about similar international plans is not presented due to immateriality.

(Dollars in millions) Goodwill
Other Intangible Assets
Balance at April 30, 2017 $ 753
$ 641
Foreign currency translation adjustment 2
20
Balance at July 31, 2017 $ 755
$ 661



	Three Months Ended
	July 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2017			2018
Pension Benefits:
Service cost	$	6		$	6
Interest cost	7			9
Expected return on plan assets	(10		)	(12		)
Amortization of net actuarial loss	5			5
Net cost	$	8		$	8

Other Postretirement Benefits:
Interest cost	$	1		$	1
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)	(1		)	(1		)
Net cost	$	—		$	—

~~Our other intangible assets consist of trademarks and brand names, all with indefinite useful lives.~~

12. Stockholders’ Equity

The following table ~~summarizes~~shows the changes in stockholders’ equity during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

(Dollars in millions)
Class A Common Stock

Class B Common Stock

Additional Paid-in Capital

Retained Earnings
AOCI
Treasury Stock
Total
Balance at April 30, 2017 $ 25
$ 43
$ 65
$ 4,470
$ (390 ) $ (2,843 ) $ 1,370
Retirement of treasury stock (10 ) (8 ) (2,684 ) 2,702
—
Net income 178
178
Net other comprehensive income (loss) 14
14
Cash dividends (140 ) (140 )
Acquisition of treasury stock (1 ) (1 )
Stock-based compensation expense 4
4
Stock issued under compensation plans 9
9
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans (14 )
(14 )
Balance at July 31, 2017 $ 25
$ 33
$ 47
$ 1,824
$ (376 ) $ (133 ) $ 1,420

~~Retirement of Treasury Stock.~~ On May 24, 2017, we retired 67,000,000 shares of Class B common stock previously held as treasury shares. This retirement reduced the number of issued shares of Class B common stock by that same amount.



(Dollars in millions)	Class A Common Stock		Class B Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			AOCI			Treasury Stock			Total
Balance at April 30, 2018	$	25	$	47	$	4		$	1,730		$	(378	)	$	(112	)	$	1,316
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting standards (Note 1)								(5		)							(5		)
Net income								200									200
Net other comprehensive income (loss)											14						14
Cash dividends								(152		)							(152		)
Acquisition of treasury stock														(6		)	(6		)
Stock-based compensation expense					5												5
Stock issued under compensation plans														9			9
Loss on issuance of treasury stock issued under compensation plans					(7		)	(6		)							(13		)
Balance at July 31, 2018	$	25	$	47	$	2		$	1,767		$	(364	)	$	(109	)	$	1,368

Dividends. The following table ~~summarizes~~shows the cash dividends declared per share on our Class A and Class B common stock during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017:~~2018:



Declaration Date	Record Date	Payable Date	Amount per Share
May 24, ~~2017~~2018	June ~~5, 2017~~6, 2018	July 3, ~~2017~~2018	$~~0.1825~~0.158
July ~~27, 2017~~26, 2018	September ~~7, 2017~~6, 2018	October ~~2, 2017~~1, 2018	$~~0.1825~~0.158

Accumulated ~~Other Comprehensive Income.~~other comprehensive income. The following table ~~summarizes~~shows the ~~changes~~change in each component of AOCI, net of tax, during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017:~~2018:


(Dollars in millions)	Currency Translation Adjustments			Cash Flow Hedge Adjustments			Postretirement Benefits Adjustments			Total AOCI			Currency Translation Adjustments			Cash Flow Hedge Adjustments			Postretirement Benefits Adjustments			Total AOCI
Balance at April 30, 2017	$	(204	)	$	11		$	(197	)	$	(390	)
Balance at April 30, 2018													$	(180	)	$	(17	)	$	(181	)	$	(378	)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)	34			(23		)	3			14			(12		)	23			3			14
Balance at July 31, 2017	$	(170	)	$	(12	)	$	(194	)	$	(376	)
Balance at July 31, 2018													$	(192	)	$	6		$	(178	)	$	(364	)

13. Other Comprehensive Income

The following ~~tables present~~table shows the components of net other comprehensive income (loss):


	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	July 31, 2016									July 31, 2017									July 31, 2017									July 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)	Pre-Tax			Tax			Net			Pre-Tax			Tax			Net			Pre-Tax			Tax			Net			Pre-Tax			Tax			Net
Currency translation adjustments:
Net gain (loss) on currency translation	$	(68	)	$	1		$	(67	)	$	28		$	6		$	34		$	28		$	6		$	34		$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(12	)
Reclassification to earnings	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net	(68		)	1			(67		)	28			6			34			28			6			34			(5		)	(7		)	(12		)
Cash flow hedge adjustments:
Net gain (loss) on hedging instruments	29			(11		)	18			(36		)	14			(22		)	(36		)	14			(22		)	27			(6		)	21
Reclassification to earnings¹	(10		)	4			(6		)	(2		)	1			(1		)	(2		)	1			(1		)	2			—			2
Other comprehensive income (loss), net	19			(7		)	12			(38		)	15			(23		)	(38		)	15			(23		)	29			(6		)	23
Postretirement benefits adjustments:
Net actuarial gain (loss) and prior service cost	—			—			—			1			—			1			1			—			1			—			—			—
Reclassification to earnings²	5			(2		)	3			4			(2		)	2			4			(2		)	2			4			(1		)	3
Other comprehensive income (loss), net	5			(2		)	3			5			(2		)	3			5			(2		)	3			4			(1		)	3

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net	$	(44	)	$	(8	)	$	(52	)	$	(5	)	$	19		$	14		$	(5	)	$	19		$	14		$	28		$	(14	)	$	14

¹Pre-tax amount is classified as ~~net~~ sales in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

²Pre-tax amount is ~~a component~~classified as non-operating postretirement expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of ~~pension and other postretirement benefit expense (as shown in Note 7, except for amounts related to non-U.S. benefit plans, about which no information is presented in Note 7 due to immateriality).~~operations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with both our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K. Note that the results of operations for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 do not necessarily indicate what our operating results for the full fiscal year will be. In this Item, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Brown-Forman,” and ~~“our”~~the “Company” refer to Brown-Forman ~~Corporation.~~Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, collectively.

Presentation Basis

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use certain financial measures in this report that are not measures of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). These non-GAAP measures, defined below, should be viewed as supplements to (not substitutes for) our results of operations and other measures reported under GAAP. Other companies may not define or calculate these non-GAAP measures in the same way.

“Underlying change” in income statement measures.We present changes in certain income statement measures, or line items, that are adjusted to an “underlying” basis. We use “underlying change” for the following income statement measures: (a) underlying net sales, (b) underlying cost of sales, (c) underlying gross profit, (d) underlying advertising expenses, (e) underlying selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses, (f) underlying other expense (income), (g) underlying operating expenses¹, and (h) underlying operating income. To calculate these measures, we adjust, as applicable, for (a) new accounting standard, (b) foreign exchange, and (c) estimated net changes in distributor inventories. We explain these adjustments below.

“New accounting standard.” Under ASC 606 (Revenue from Contracts with Customers), we recognize the cost of certain customer incentives earlier than we did before adopting ASC 606. Although we do not expect this change in timing to have a significant impact on a full-year basis, we do anticipate some change in the pattern of recognition among fiscal quarters. Additionally, some payments to customers that we classified as expenses before adopting the new standard are classified as reductions of net sales under our new policy. See Note 2 to the accompanying financial statements for additional information. This adjustment allows us to look at underlying change on a comparable basis.

“Foreign exchange.” We calculate the percentage change in our income statement line items in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjusting for foreign exchange allows us to understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current-year results at prior-year rates and remove foreign exchange gains and losses from current- and prior-year periods.

“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.” This adjustment refers to the estimated net effect of changes in distributor inventories on changes in our income statement line items. For each period compared, we use volume information from our distributors to estimate the effect of distributor inventory changes on our income statement line items. We believe that this adjustment reduces the effect of varying levels of distributor inventories on changes in our measures and allows us to understand better our underlying results and trends.

We use the non-GAAP measures “underlying change” for the following reasons: (a) to understand our performance from period to period on a consistent basis; (b) to compare our performance to that of our competitors; (c) in connection with management incentive compensation calculations; (d) in our planning and forecasting processes; and (e) in communications concerning our financial performance with the board of directors, stockholders, and investment analysts. We provide reconciliations of the “underlying changes in income statement measures” to their nearest GAAP measures in the tables below under “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Period Comparisons.” We have consistently applied the adjustments within our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure.

~~Volume~~

¹Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and ~~Depletions~~other expense (income), net.

~~When discussing volume, unless otherwise specified,~~

Definitions

Aggregations.

From time to time, to explain our results of operations or to highlight trends and uncertainties affecting our business, we ~~refer~~aggregate markets according to ~~“depletions,~~stage of economic development as defined by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and we aggregate brands by spirits category. Below, we define aggregations used in this report.

Geographic Aggregations.

In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2019 Year-to-Date Highlights”, we provide supplemental information for our largest markets ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2018 net sales. In addition to markets that are listed by country name, we include the following aggregations:

“Developed International” markets are “advanced economies” as defined by the IMF, excluding the United States. Our largest developed international markets are the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany. This aggregation represents our sales of branded products to these markets.

“Emerging” markets are “emerging and developing economies” as defined by the IMF. Our largest emerging markets are Mexico and Poland. This aggregation represents our sales of branded products to these markets.

“Travel Retail” represents our sales of branded products to global duty-free customers, travel retail customers, and the U.S. military regardless of customer location.

“Non-branded and bulk” includes our sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.

Brand Aggregations.

In “Results of Operations - Fiscal 2019 Year-to-Date Highlights”, we provide supplemental information for our largest brands ranked by percentage of total fiscal 2018 net sales. In addition to brands that are listed by name, we include the following aggregations:

“Whiskey” products include all whiskey spirits and whiskey-based flavored liqueurs, ready-to-drink, and ready-to-pour products. The brands included in this category are the Jack Daniel's family of brands, Woodford Reserve, Canadian Mist, GlenDronach, BenRiach, Glenglassaugh, Old Forester, Early Times, Slane Irish Whiskey, and Coopers' Craft.

“American whiskey” products include the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, premium bourbons, and Early Times.

“Jack Daniel’s family of brands” includes Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP products (JD RTDs/RTP), Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey (JDTH), Gentleman Jack, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF), Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Rye Whiskey (JDTR), Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey, and Jack Daniel’s Bottled-in-Bond.

“Jack Daniel’s RTD and RTP” products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Cider (JD Cider), Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade (JD Lynchburg Lemonade), and the seasonal Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.


◦	“Premium bourbon” products include Woodford Reserve, Old Forester, and Coopers’ Craft.

“Tequila” products include el Jimador, Herradura, New Mix, Pepe Lopez, and Antiguo.

“Vodka” products include Finlandia.

“Wine” products include Korbel Champagne and Sonoma-Cutrer wines.

“Non-branded and bulk” includes our sales of used barrels, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling regardless of customer location.

Other Metrics.

“Depletions.”We generally record revenues when we ship our products to our customers. Depending on our route-to-consumer (RTC), we ship products to either (a) retail or wholesale customers in owned distribution markets or (b) our distributor customers in other markets. “Depletions” is a term commonly used in the beverage alcohol ~~industry.~~industry to describe volume. Depending on the context, “depletions” means either (a) our shipments directly to ~~retailers~~retail or ~~wholesalers,~~wholesale customers for owned distribution markets or (b) shipments from our distributor customers to retailers and ~~wholesalers. We generally record revenues when we ship our products to our customers, so our reported sales for a period do not necessarily reflect actual consumer purchases during that period.~~wholesalers in other markets. We believe that ~~our~~ depletions measure volume in a way that more closely reflects consumer demand than our shipments to distributor customers do. In this document, unless otherwise specified, we refer to “depletions” when discussing volume.

“Drinks-equivalent.”Volume is discussed on a nine-liter equivalent unit basis (nine-liter cases) unless otherwise specified. At times, we use a “drinks-equivalent” measure for volume when comparing single-serve ready-to-drink (RTD) or ready-to-pour (RTP) brands to a parent spirits brand. “Drinks-equivalent” depletions are RTD and RTP nine-liter cases converted to nine-liter cases of a parent brand on the basis of the number of drinks in one nine-liter case of the parent brand. To convert RTD volumes from a nine-liter case basis to a drinks-equivalent nine-liter case basis, RTD nine-liter case volumes are divided by 10, while RTP nine-liter case volumes are divided by 5.

~~Non-GAAP Financial Measures~~

We use certain financial measures in this report that are not measures of financial performance under GAAP. These non-GAAP measures, defined below, should be viewed as supplements to (not substitutes for) our results of operations and other measures reported under GAAP. The non-GAAP measures we use in this report may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner.

~~“Underlying change” in income statement measures.~~We present changes in certain income statement measures, or line items, that are adjusted to an “underlying” basis. We use “underlying change” for the following income statement measures: (a) underlying net sales, (b) underlying cost of sales, (c) underlying gross profit, (d) underlying advertising expenses, (e) underlying selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses, (f) underlying other expense (income), (g) underlying operating expenses, and (h) underlying operating income. To calculate these measures, we adjust, as applicable, for (a) acquisitions and divestitures, (b) foreign exchange, and (c) estimated net changes in distributor inventories. We explain these adjustments below.

~~“Acquisitions and divestitures.”~~ In fiscal 2016, we sold our Southern Comfort and Tuaca brands and related assets to Sazerac Company, Inc. and entered into a related transition services agreement (TSA). During fiscal 2017, we completed our obligations under the TSA. This adjustment removes the net sales and operating expenses recognized in fiscal 2017 pursuant to the TSA related to (a) contract bottling services and (b) distribution services in certain markets. On June 1, 2017, we acquired The BenRiach Distillery Company Limited (BenRiach). This adjustment removes (a) transaction and integration costs related to the acquisition and (b) operating activity for the acquisition for the non-comparable period. For both fiscal 2017 and 2018, the non-comparable period is the month of May.

“~~Foreign exchange.~~Consumer takeaway.” ~~We calculate~~When discussing trends in the ~~percentage change~~market, we refer to “consumer takeaway,” a term commonly used in ~~our income statement line items in accordance with GAAP and adjust to exclude~~ the cost or benefit of currency fluctuations. Adjusting for foreign exchange allows us to understand our business on a constant-dollar basis, as fluctuations in exchange rates can distort the underlying trend both positively and negatively. (In this report, “dollar” always means the U.S. dollar unless stated otherwise.) To eliminate the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations when comparing across periods, we translate current year results at prior-year rates.

~~“Estimated net change in distributor inventories.”~~ ~~This adjustment~~beverage alcohol industry. “Consumer takeaway” refers to the ~~estimated net effect~~purchase of product by the consumer from a retail outlet as measured by volume or retail sales value. This information is provided by third parties, such as Nielsen and the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (NABCA). Our estimates of market share or changes in ~~distributor inventories on changes in our income statement line items. For each period compared, we use depletion information provided by our distributors to estimate~~market share are derived from consumer takeaway data using the ~~effect of distributor inventory changes on our income statement line items.~~retail sales value metric.

~~We use the non-GAAP measures “underlying change” for the following reasons: (a) to understand~~

Reclassifications

As discussed in Note 1, we retrospectively adjusted our ~~performance from period to period on a consistent basis and to compare our performance to that of our competitors; (b)~~prior year income statements in connection with ~~management incentive compensation calculations; (c) in our planning~~the adoption of ASU 2017-07 and ~~forecasting processes;~~the reclassification of some previously reported expense amounts related to certain marketing research and ~~(d) in communications concerning our~~promotional agency costs. The impact of these reclassifications, which had no effect on net income, was not material.

The following table reconciles the previously reported income statement amounts to the currently reported amounts for the three months ended July 31, 2017.



	Three Months Ended July 31, 2017
	Previously			Adoption of						Currently
(Dollars in millions)	Reported			ASU 2017-07			Reclassifications			Reported
Net sales	$	723								$	723
Cost of sales	230									230
Gross profit	493			—			—			493
Advertising expenses	89						(2		)	87
Selling, general, and administrative expenses	161			(2		)	2			161
Other expense (income), net	(1		)							(1		)
Operating income	244			2			—			246
Non-operating postretirement expense	—			2						2
Interest income	(1		)							(1		)
Interest expense	16									16
Income before income taxes	229			—			—			229
Income taxes	51									51
Net income	$	178		$	—		$	—		$	178

financial performance with the board of directors, stockholders, and investment analysts. We provide reconciliations of the “underlying changes in income statement measures” to their nearest GAAP measures in the tables below under “Results of Operations - Year-Over-Year Period Comparisons.” We have consistently applied the adjustments within our reconciliations in arriving at each non-GAAP measure.

Important Information on Forward-Looking Statements:

This report contains statements, estimates, and projections that are “forward-looking statements” as defined under U.S. federal securities laws. Words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “envision,” “estimate,” “expect,” “expectation,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “pursue,” “see,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar words ~~identify~~indicate forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date we make them. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors (many beyond our control) that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical experience or from our current expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors of our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including:

Unfavorable global or regional economic conditions and related low consumer confidence, high unemployment, weak credit or capital markets, budget deficits, burdensome government debt, austerity measures, higher interest rates, higher taxes, political instability, higher inflation, deflation, lower returns on pension assets, or lower discount rates for pension obligations

Risks associated with being a U.S.-based company with global operations, including commercial, political, and financial risks; local labor policies and conditions; protectionist trade policies, or economic or trade ~~sanctions;~~sanctions, including potential retaliatory tariffs on American spirits and the effectiveness of our actions to mitigate the potential negative impact on our sales and distributors; compliance with local trade practices and other regulations, including anti-corruption laws; terrorism; and health pandemics

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly a stronger U.S. dollar

Changes in laws, regulations, or policies – especially those that affect the production, importation, marketing, labeling, pricing, distribution, sale, or consumption of our beverage alcohol products

Tax rate changes (including excise, sales, VAT, tariffs, duties, corporate, individual income, dividends, or capital gains) or changes in related reserves, changes in tax rules ~~(for example, LIFO, foreign income deferral, U.S. manufacturing, and other deductions)~~ or accounting standards, and the unpredictability and suddenness with which they can occur

The impact of the recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation, including as a result of future regulations and guidance interpreting the statute

Dependence upon the continued growth of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands

Changes in consumer preferences, consumption, or purchase patterns – particularly away from larger producers in favor of ~~smaller~~small distilleries or local producers, or away from brown spirits, our premium products, or spirits generally, and our ability to anticipate or react to them; legalization of marijuana use on a more widespread basis; shifts in consumer purchase practices from traditional to e-commerce retailers; bar, restaurant, travel, or other on-premise declines; shifts in demographic or health and wellness trends; or unfavorable consumer reaction to new products, line extensions, package changes, product reformulations, or other product innovation

Decline in the social acceptability of beverage alcohol ~~products~~ in significant markets

Production facility, aging warehouse, or supply chain disruption

Imprecision in supply/demand forecasting

Higher costs, lower quality, or unavailability of energy, water, raw materials, product ingredients, labor, or finished goods

Route-to-consumer changes that affect the timing of our sales, temporarily disrupt the marketing or sale of our products, or result in higher ~~implementation-related or~~ fixed costs

Inventory fluctuations in our products by distributors, wholesalers, or retailers

Competitors’ and retailers’ consolidation or other competitive activities, such as pricing actions (including price reductions, promotions, discounting, couponing, or free goods), marketing, category expansion, product introductions, or entry or expansion in our geographic markets or distribution networks

Risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions, business partnerships or investments – such as acquisition integration, or termination difficulties or costs, or impairment in recorded value

Inadequate protection of our intellectual property rights

Product recalls or other product liability ~~claims;~~claims, product counterfeiting, tampering, contamination, or ~~product~~ quality issues

Significant legal disputes and ~~proceedings;~~proceedings, or government investigations ~~(particularly of industry or company business, trade or marketing practices)~~

Failure or breach of key information technology systems

Negative publicity related to our company, brands, marketing, personnel, operations, business performance, or prospects

Failure to attract or retain key executive or employee talent

Our status as a family “controlled company” under New York Stock Exchange rules, and our dual class share structure

Overview

Tariffs

In response to new U.S. tariffs on certain foreign goods, the European Union, Mexico, Canada, Turkey, and China imposed retaliatory tariffs on a number of U.S. goods, including American whiskey. The effective dates of the retaliatory tariffs and the import duty rates before and after the retaliation are summarized below.

Summary of Retaliatory Tariffs

		Rate
Geographic Area	Effective Date	Before		After
European Union	June 22, 2018	—	%	25	%
Mexico	June 5, 2018	—	%	25	%
Canada	July 1, 2018	—	%	10	%
Turkey	June 21, 2018	—	%	140	%	¹
China	July 6, 2018	5	%	30	%
¹ Initially announced as 70%; subsequently revised to 140% on August 15, 2018.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, our net sales in major European Union countries were higher than normal as many retail and wholesale customers increased purchases to build inventory ahead of anticipated price increases related to tariffs (hereafter referred to as “tariff-related buy-ins”). We discuss the estimated effect of the tariffs on our results and outlook where relevant below.

Fiscal ~~2018~~2019 Year-to-Date Highlights

Key highlights of our operating results for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 include:

We delivered net sales of ~~$723~~$766 million,, an increase of 9%6% compared to the same period last year. Excluding (a) the ~~impact of acquisitions and divestitures, the positive~~negative effect of foreign exchange driven by the weakening of the Turkish lira, British pound, euro, and Mexican peso, (b) the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, we grew underlying net sales 6%9%. We estimate that the tariff-related buy-ins contributed approximately two to three percentage points to our underlying net sales growth.


◦	From a brand perspective, our underlying net sales growth was driven by the Jack Daniel's family of brands and our premium bourbon brands.


◦	From a geographic perspective, developed international markets led the growth in underlying net sales, partially due to tariff-related buy-ins. Emerging markets and the United States both contributed meaningfully. Travel Retail accelerated the rate of underlying net sales growth compared to the same period last year partially due to favorable timing of customer orders in the current year.

We delivered operating income of ~~$244~~$264 million, an increase of ~~14%~~7% compared to the same period last year. Excluding (a) the ~~impact~~adoption of ~~acquisitions and divestitures,~~the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and ~~the~~(c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, we grew underlying operating income ~~12%~~10%.

We delivered diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.46~~,$0.41, an increase of ~~27%~~12% compared to the same period last year due to anthe increase in reported operating income and the benefit of a lower effective tax rate, ~~and a reduction in shares outstanding.~~

partially offset by higher interest expense.

Our underlying operating results were driven by the Jack Daniel's family of brands, our tequila brands, and Woodford Reserve. From a geographic perspective, emerging markets and the United States led the growth, Travel Retail net sales accelerated compared to the same period last year, while developed markets grew less than 1%. In addition, our underlying operating results benefited from a reduction in underlying SG&A expenses.

While foreign exchange had a positive effect on net sales, our operating income was negatively affected, driven by the absence of prior year foreign exchange gains in other expense (income). An estimated net increase in distributor inventories due primarily to the United States and Russia positively affected our reported results.

Summary of Operating Performance
	Three months ended July 31,										Three months ended July 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2016			2017			Reported Change		Underlying Change¹		2017			2018			Reported Change		Underlying Change¹
Net sales	$	661		$	723		9	%	6	%	$	723		$	766		6	%	9	%
Cost of sales	208			230			11	%	6	%	230			243			6	%	8	%
Gross profit	453			493			9	%	6	%	493			523			6	%	9	%
Advertising	82			89			8	%	6	%	87			98			14	%	17	%
SG&A	163			161			(1	%)	(1	%)	161			168			4	%	5	%
Other expense (income), net	(5		)	(1		)	(85	%)	1	%
Operating income	$	213		$	244		14	%	12	%	$	246		$	264		7	%	10	%

As a percentage of net sales
Total operating expenses²											$	247		$	259		5	%	9	%

As a percentage of net sales³
Gross profit	68.5		%	68.1		%	(0.4	)pp			68.1		%	68.2		%	0.1	pp
Operating expenses²	36.2		%	34.5		%	(1.7	)pp
Operating income	32.2		%	33.7		%	1.5	pp			34.0		%	34.5		%	0.5	pp
Interest expense, net	$	12		15			19	%			$	15		20			36	%
Effective tax rate	28.2		%	22.1		%	(6.1	)pp			22.1		%	17.4		%	(4.7	)pp
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.36		$	0.46		27	%			$	0.37		$	0.41		12	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding	Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

¹See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying changes,” including how these measures are calculated and the reasons why we ~~think~~believe this information is useful to readers.

²~~Operating~~See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for definitions of operating expenses ~~include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.~~presented here.

³Year-over-year changes in percentages are reported in percentage points (pp).

Fiscal 2019 Outlook

Below we discuss our outlook for the remainder of fiscal 2019, reflecting the trends, developments, and uncertainties that we expect to affect our business. This updated outlook revises certain aspects of the 2019 outlook included in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our 2018 Form 10-K. When we provide guidance for underlying change for the following income statement measures we do not provide guidance for the corresponding GAAP change because the GAAP measure will include items that are difficult to quantify or predict with reasonable certainty, including the estimated net change in distributor inventories and foreign exchange, each of which could have a significant impact to our GAAP income statement measures.

Tariffs. In response to the U.S. tariffs on certain foreign goods, the European Union, Mexico, Canada, Turkey, and China have imposed retaliatory tariffs on a number of U.S. goods, including American whiskey. Our American whiskeys are made in the United States and exported around the world. Our first quarter results benefited from tariff-related buy-ins. Our full year outlook, which is discussed below, has been adjusted to reflect the anticipated negative effect of tariffs, net of mitigation plans, over the remainder of our fiscal year. The effect of tariffs will largely result in higher cost of sales.

Net sales. We expect underlying net sales growth in the remainder of fiscal 2019 to be lower than the growth in the three months ended July 31, 2018, which benefited from tariff-related buy-ins. However, we continue to expect the fiscal 2019 underlying net sales growth rate to be similar to our fiscal 2018 growth rate.

Cost of sales. We expect total cost of sales to grow at a significantly higher rate than net sales in the remainder of fiscal 2019, as we expect to absorb costs related to tariffs as well as input cost increases in the mid-single digits. These costs are expected to result in lower gross margins for the remainder of the fiscal year compared to the three months ended July 31, 2018.

Operating expenses. We expect total operating expenses to grow at a lower rate in the remainder of the fiscal year compared to the growth rate experienced in the three months ended July 31, 2018.

Operating income. We expect slower growth rates for operating income in the remainder of fiscal 2019 compared to growth rates experienced in the three months ended July 31, 2018.

Foreign exchange. For the three months ended July 31, 2018, net sales and operating income were negatively affected by foreign exchange, and we expect that negative trend to continue for the remainder of the fiscal year.

New accounting standard. Our reported net sales and operating income were negatively affected by timing differences related to the implementation of the revenue recognition accounting standard during the three months ended July 31, 2018. We expect that negative trend to moderate in the remainder of the fiscal year.

Estimated net change in distributor inventories. Our reported net sales and operating income benefited from an estimated net increase in distributor inventories during the three months ended July 31, 2018. We expect that benefit to moderate in the remainder of the fiscal year.

Effective tax rate. We expect our full year tax rate on ordinary income to be 21.1%.

Results of Operations – Fiscal ~~2018~~2019 Year-to-Date Highlights

Market Highlights

The following table provides supplemental information for our largest markets for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the same period last year. We discuss results for the markets most affecting our performance below the table. Unless otherwise indicated, all related commentary is for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the same period last year.

Top 10 Markets¹- Fiscal 2018 Net Sales Growth by Geographic Area
Top 10 Markets¹- Fiscal 2019 Net Sales Growth by Geographic Area											Top 10 Markets¹- Fiscal 2019 Net Sales Growth by Geographic Area

	Percentage change versus prior year period										Percentage change versus prior year period
Three months ended July 31, 2017	Net Sales
Geographic area	Reported		Acquisitions & Divestitures		Foreign Exchange		Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories		Underlying²
Three months ended July 31, 2018											Net Sales
Geographic area²											Reported		New Accounting Standard		Foreign Exchange		Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories		Underlying³
United States	10	%	—	%	—	%	(5	%)	5	%	—	%	1	%	—	%	1	%	2	%
Europe	13	%	—	%	(5	%)	(3	%)	4	%
Developed International											12	%	2	%	6	%	(3	%)	16	%
United Kingdom	6	%	(1	%)	(11	%)	—	%	(6	%)	19	%	—	%	14	%	—	%	33	%
Australia											2	%	—	%	4	%	—	%	6	%
Germany	6	%	(1	%)	(5	%)	—	%	(1	%)	28	%	—	%	10	%	—	%	38	%
France	8	%	—	%	(4	%)	—	%	4	%	(1	%)	—	%	5	%	—	%	3	%
Canada											(2	%)	4	%	2	%	(4	%)	—	%
Rest of Developed International											13	%	7	%	1	%	(12	%)	9	%
Emerging											7	%	3	%	7	%	(4	%)	11	%
Mexico											(6	%)	2	%	9	%	—	%	5	%
Poland	29	%	—	%	(9	%)	—	%	20	%	8	%	—	%	(4	%)	—	%	4	%
Russia	NM		—	%	28	%	NM		38	%	57	%	—	%	(14	%)	(55	%)	(12	%)
Rest of Europe	3	%	—	%	(2	%)	3	%	4	%
Australia	12	%	5	%	(1	%)	—	%	17	%
Other geographies	5	%	(1	%)	1	%	4	%	10	%
Mexico	11	%	—	%	1	%	1	%	13	%
Japan	(25	%)	—	%	2	%	9	%	(14	%)
Canada	—	%	—	%	6	%	(3	%)	2	%
Remaining geographies³	11	%	(1	%)	(1	%)	6	%	15	%
Travel Retail⁴	4	%	—	%	3	%	5	%	12	%
Other non-branded⁵	(8	%)	23	%	1	%	—	%	16	%
Brazil											20	%	2	%	20	%	(11	%)	30	%
Rest of Emerging											7	%	4	%	9	%	1	%	20	%
Travel Retail											24	%	—	%	(2	%)	—	%	22	%
Non-branded and bulk											19	%	—	%	(1	%)	—	%	18	%
Total	9	%	1	%	(1	%)	(3	%)	6	%	6	%	1	%	2	%	(1	%)	9	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

¹“Top 10 markets” are ranked based on percentage of total ~~Fiscal 2017 Net Sales.~~fiscal 2018 net sales. See ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K “Results of Operations - Fiscal ~~2017~~2018 Market Highlights” and “Note ~~15.~~14. Supplemental Information.”

²See “Definitions” above for definitions of market aggregations presented here.

³See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how this measure is calculated and the reasons why we ~~think~~believe this information is useful to readers.

³~~“Remaining geographies” represents over 110 countries, with the largest being Brazil, China, and Argentina.~~

⁴~~“Travel Retail” represents our sales to global duty free customers, travel retail customers, and the U.S. military.~~

⁵~~“Other non-branded” includes used barrel, bulk whiskey and wine, and contract bottling sales.~~

United States. Reported net sales ~~grew 10%~~were flat, while underlying net sales increased 2% after adjusting for the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales gains were driven by the growth of Woodford Reserve, el Jimador, JD RTDs, Herradura, Old Forester, and JDTR. These gains were partially offset by declines of JDTW and Korbel Champagne, the former of which was largely due to timing and comparisons against a strong start to last fiscal year, although takeaway trends remain stable.

Developed International. Reported net sales increased 12%, while underlying net sales ~~increased 5%~~grew 16% after adjusting for (a) the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar against the British pound and euro, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales gains were ~~driven primarily by the growth of our American whiskey portfolio,~~ led by ~~the Jack Daniel’s family of brands and Woodford Reserve, and our tequila brands, led by el Jimador and Herradura. This growth was partially offset by declines in Canadian Mist.~~

~~Europe.~~ Reported net sales increased 13%, while underlying net sales increased 4% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange driven by the broad weakening of the dollar and an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in Russia. Underlying net sales gains in Poland, Russia, Turkey, and France were partially offset by declinesmarkets in the ~~United Kingdom.~~European Union reflecting tariff-related buy-ins.


◦	In ~~Poland,~~the United Kingdom, underlying net sales growth was ~~led~~driven by ~~volume gains~~higher volumes and favorable channel mix of ~~Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey (JDTW), which has experienced strong consumer takeaway trends.~~JDTW along with higher volumes of JDTH, with both brands benefiting significantly from tariff-related buy-ins.


◦	In ~~Russia,~~Australia, underlying net sales growth was driven by ~~favorable price/mix~~higher volumes and higher pricing of JDTW partly due to a buy-in ahead of August 1, 2018 price increase. This growth was partially offset by lower volume of JD RTDs compared to the same period last year when there was a buy-in ahead of price increases.


◦	In Germany, underlying net sales growth was driven by volumetric growth of JDTW and ~~Finlandia. The market remained stable through the first quarter of fiscal 2018, building on growth in the second half of fiscal 2017.~~JD RTDs partly due to customer buying patterns, with both brands benefiting significantly from tariff-related buy-ins.


◦	In France, underlying net sales growth was ~~fueled~~led by ~~Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire (JDTF)~~higher volumes of JDTH and JDTW, ~~driven~~the latter of which was partially offset by ~~increasing consumer demand despite recent declines in the total whiskey category.~~timing of current year promotional activity.


◦	In ~~the United Kingdom,~~Canada, underlying net sales were flat as volume declines ~~were driven by lower volumes of~~in the Jack Daniel’s ~~Tennessee Honey (JDTH) and JDTF and unfavorable price/mix on JDTW, partially~~family of brands were essentially offset by ~~the launch of JD Cider.~~


◦	~~In Germany, underlying net sales declines were primarily due to volume declines of JDTW, reflecting the timing of customer purchases. This reduction was nearly offset by solid~~ growth of ~~JD RTDs, including the launch of JD Lynchburg Lemonade.~~Woodford Reserve.

◦

The increase in underlying net sales in the Rest of ~~Europe~~Developed International was ~~primarily~~ led by ~~improved trends~~Spain and Czechia. In Spain, JDTW grew volumes along with favorable price/mix, where our new owned-distribution organization has led to an acceleration in ~~Turkey, where~~performance over the past 12 months. In Czechia, growth was ~~driven~~led by the Jack ~~Daniel's family. Our results in the same period last year were affected by political and economic instability.~~Daniels family of brands.

~~Australia.~~Emerging. Reported net sales increased ~~12%~~7%, while underlying net sales grew 11% after adjusting for (a) the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar primarily against the Turkish lira and Mexican peso, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by Brazil, Turkey, Mexico, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and China, partially offset by declines in Russia.


◦	In Mexico, underlying net sales growth was led by higher pricing of New Mix along with higher pricing and volume growth of JD RTDs.


◦	In Poland, underlying net sales growth was led by increased volumes of JDTW partly due to tariff-related buy-ins. Lower pricing and volume declines of Finlandia mostly offset the growth due to customer buying patterns and disruption related to packaging changes.


◦	In Russia, the underlying net sales decline was driven by Finlandia and JDTW, which was mostly due to changes in distributor and related buying patterns.


◦	In Brazil, underlying net sales growth was fueled by volumetric growth and higher pricing of JDTW.


◦	The increase in underlying net sales in the Rest of Emerging was led by Turkey, CIS, China, and Romania. All of these geographic areas benefited from higher volumes of JDTW including Turkey, which was partly due to a buy-in ahead of price increases.

Travel Retail. Reported net sales increased 24%, while underlying net sales increased ~~17%~~22% after adjusting for the ~~net~~positive effect of ~~acquisitions and the loss of~~foreign exchange. Underlying net sales ~~related~~growth was led by higher volumes of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, including the launch of JDTR and Jack Daniel’s Bottled-in-Bond, along with higher volumes of Woodford Reserve. Growth was due to ~~our transition services~~favorable timing of customer orders in the current year, strong consumer demand, and increased travel.

Non-branded and bulk. Reported net sales increased 19%, while underlying net sales increased 18% after adjusting for ~~divested brands and~~ the positive effect of foreign exchange. Underlying net sales growth was driven by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands, led by (a) Jack Daniel’s & Cola, which benefited from a buy-in ahead of August 1, 2017 price increase, (b) recently launched JD RTD line extensions, and (c) JDTW volume growth.

~~Other geographies.~~ Reported net sales for our other markets increased 5%, while underlying net sales collectively increased 10% after adjusting for (a) the positive effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) the estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by Mexico, Brazil (which benefited from a buy-in ahead of August 1, 2017 price increase), China, and Latin America. These gains were partially offset by volume declines in Japan due to buy-in ahead of price increases in the same period last year.

~~Travel Retail.~~ Reported net sales increased 4% and underlying net sales increased 12% after adjusting reported results for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. Underlying net sales growth was led by higher ~~volumes of JDTW, Finlandia, and JDTH.~~

~~Other non-branded.~~ Reported net sales decreased 8%, while underlying net sales increased 16% after adjusting for the net effect of acquisitions and the loss of net sales related to our transition services for divested brands. The underlying net sales growth was driven by higher net salespricing of used barrels ~~reflecting an easy comparison to very weak net sales~~along with growth in ~~prior-year period, as well as timing of shipments in the current year.~~contract bottling.

Brand Highlights

The following table ~~highlights the worldwide results of~~provides supplemental information for our largest brands for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the same period last year. We discuss results of the brands most affecting our performance below the table. Unless otherwise indicated, all related commentary is for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the same period last year.

Major Brands Worldwide Results
Percentage change versus prior year period
Three months ended July 31, 2017 Volumes Net Sales
Brand family / brand 9L Depletions Reported Foreign Exchange Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories
Underlying¹
Jack Daniel’s Family 10 % 10 % (1 %) (3 %) 6 %
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Whiskey 4 % 9 % (1 %) (4 %) 4 %
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey 5 % 3 % (1 %) 1 % 3 %
Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP²
17 % 24 % — % (2 %) 22 %
Gentleman Jack 8 % 7 % — % 1 % 8 %
Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Fire 19 % 21 % (1 %) (6 %) 14 %
Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands³
(6 %) (3 %) (1 %) 2 % (2 %)
Woodford Reserve 16 % 10 % — % 6 % 16 %
Finlandia 6 % 17 % — % (10 %) 6 %
el Jimador 11 % 19 % 1 % (7 %) 13 %
Herradura 13 % 11 % — % 7 % 18 %
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

Major Brands Worldwide Results

	Percentage change versus prior year period
Three months ended July 31, 2018	Volumes		Net Sales
Product category / brand family / brand¹	9L Depletions¹		Reported		New Accounting Standard		Foreign Exchange		Net Chg in Est. Distributor Inventories		Underlying²
Whiskey	7	%	8	%	1	%	2	%	(1	%)	11	%
Jack Daniel's Family	8	%	7	%	1	%	3	%	(2	%)	10	%
JDTW	9	%	5	%	2	%	2	%	(1	%)	8	%
Jack Daniel's RTD/RTP	5	%	6	%	—	%	5	%	—	%	10	%
JD Tennessee Honey	10	%	21	%	2	%	2	%	(12	%)	12	%
Gentleman Jack	6	%	4	%	1	%	1	%	—	%	7	%
JD Tennessee Fire	11	%	10	%	1	%	1	%	1	%	13	%
Other Jack Daniel's whiskey brands	77	%	43	%	1	%	2	%	1	%	47	%
Woodford Reserve	26	%	30	%	2	%	1	%	(4	%)	29	%
Tequila	—	%	7	%	3	%	4	%	(5	%)	9	%
el Jimador	4	%	10	%	5	%	3	%	(6	%)	11	%
Herradura	6	%	11	%	4	%	3	%	(8	%)	10	%
Vodka (Finlandia)	(6	%)	(18	%)	1	%	6	%	—	%	(10	%)
Wine	(3	%)	(6	%)	1	%	—	%	2	%	(3	%)
Rest of Portfolio	(3	%)	(11	%)	—	%	5	%	1	%	(4	%)
Non-branded	NM		19	%	—	%	(1	%)	—	%	18	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

¹See “Definitions” above for definitions of brand aggregations and volume measures presented here.

²See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” above for details on our use of “underlying change” in net sales, including how this measure is calculated and the reasons why we ~~think~~believe this information is useful to ~~readers; see “Volume~~readers.

Whiskey brands grew reported net sales 8%, while underlying net sales grew 11% after adjusting for (a) the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar against the Turkish lira, British pound, and ~~Depletions” above for definitions of volume measures presented here.~~

²~~Jack Daniel’s RTD~~euro, and RTP products include all RTD line extensions of Jack Daniel’s, such as Jack Daniel’s & Cola, Jack Daniel’s & Diet Cola, Jack & Ginger, Jack Daniel’s Country Cocktails, Gentleman Jack & Cola, Jack Daniel’s Double Jack, Jack Daniel’s American Serve, Jack Daniel’s Tennessee Honey RTD, Jack Daniel’s Cider, Jack Daniel’s Lynchburg Lemonade, and the seasonal Jack Daniel’s Winter Jack RTP.

³~~In addition to the brands separately listed here,~~(c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. Growth was led by the Jack Daniel’s family of brands ~~includes Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection, Jack Daniel’s Sinatra Select, Jack Daniel’s No. 27 Gold Tennessee Whiskey,~~ and ~~Jack Daniel’s 1907 Tennessee Whiskey.~~

~~Jack Daniel’s family of brands~~ ~~grew reported net sales 10% (underlying 6%),~~premium bourbons, including Woodford Reserve and was the most significant contributor to our overall underlying net sales growth. Reported net sales were helped by the estimated net increase in distributor inventories, and foreign exchange due to the weakening of the dollar against the euro, Polish zloty, Mexican peso, Turkish lira, and the Australian dollar. The following are details about the underlying performance of the Jack Daniel’s family of brands:Old Forester.


◦	Jack Daniel’s family of brands underlying net sales growth was led by JDTW in markets outside of the United States along with broad-based geographic growth of JD RTDs and JDTH.

▪

JDTW grew underlying net sales in ~~several~~the majority of its markets including the United ~~States, Brazil, Poland,~~Kingdom, Germany, Travel Retail, Turkey, ~~China,~~Brazil, Spain, Poland, and ~~Russia. These increases were~~Australia, partially offset by volume declines in ~~various markets, including Germany and~~ the United ~~Kingdom.~~States, which is considered timing related. Growth in many European markets was aided by tariff-related buy-ins.


◦	~~JDTH~~ ~~grew underlying net sales in the United States, its largest market, Latin America, Brazil, Travel Retail, and Russia. These gains were partially offset by declines in the United Kingdom.~~


◦▪	The increase in underlying net sales growth for Jack Daniel’s RTDs/RTP was driven by ~~buy-ins ahead of price increases~~continued momentum in Germany and the United States.


▪	JDTH grew underlying net sales led by volume gains in the United Kingdom and its largest market, the United States.


▪	Gentleman Jack grew underlying net sales with broad-based international growth led by Australia and ~~growth~~the United Kingdom.


▪	Growth of underlying net sales of JDTF was driven by higher volumes in ~~Germany,~~ the United States and the United ~~Kingdom, with all markets also benefiting from new RTD line extensions.~~Kingdom.


▪	Underlying net sales growth for Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands was led by JDTR, which launched in September 2017, and the return to growth of Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel in the United States.


◦	~~Gentleman Jack~~Woodford Reserve ~~grew underlying~~led the growth of our premium bourbons. Underlying net sales ~~through volumetric~~ growth inwas driven by the United States, ~~its largest market.~~


◦	~~JDTF~~ ~~grew underlying net sales due~~where strong consumer takeaway trends led to ~~volume growth~~volumetric gains, and higher volumes in ~~the United States and France and the launch of the brand in Brazil. These increases were partially offset by volume declines in the United Kingdom.~~


◦	~~Our~~ ~~Other Jack Daniel’s whiskey brands’~~ ~~decreased underlying net sales were due primarily to Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Collection declines in the United Kingdom and the United States.~~Travel Retail.

~~Woodford Reserve~~Tequila ~~led the growth of our super- and ultra-premium American whiskeys with~~brands grew reported net sales increasing 10% and underlying net sales growing 16%. This growth was driven by the United States, where the brand continued to grow volumetrically with strong consumer takeaway trends. Reported net sales were hurt by an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories.

~~Reported net sales for~~ ~~Finlandia~~7% grew 17% and underlying net sales increased 6% led by favorable price/mix and higher volumes in Russia and volumetric growth in Travel Retail. Reported net sales were helped by an estimated net increase in distributor inventories, primarily in Russia.

~~Reported net sales for~~ ~~el Jimador~~ ~~increased 19%~~, while underlying net sales ~~increased 13% driven by volume gains in~~grew 9% after adjusting for (a) the ~~United States due to accelerating consumer takeaway trends. Reported net sales were helped by~~adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar against the Mexican peso, and (c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories in the United States.


◦	el Jimador grew underlying net sales driven by higher pricing and volume gains due to a buy-in ahead of price increases in the United States.


◦	Herradura grew underlying net sales driven by volumetric growth and higher pricing in the United States.

Reported net sales for Finlandia declined 18%, while underlying net sales decreased 10% after adjusting for the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard and the negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar against the Russian ruble. Volume declines in Poland (due to customer buying patterns and disruption related to packaging changes), Travel Retail, and Russia drove the decrease in underlying net sales.

Wine brands reported net sales ~~11% and~~declined 6%, while underlying net sales ~~increased 18% driven primarily by increased volumes in~~decreased 3% after adjusting for the ~~brand’s largest markets,~~adoption of the ~~United States~~revenue recognition accounting standard and ~~Mexico, the latter of which also benefited from favorable price/mix due to consumer-led volumetric growth of Herradura Ultra. Reported net sales were hurt by~~ an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories in the United States. Volume declines of Korbel Champagne were partially offset by modest growth of Sonoma-Cutrer.

Rest of portfolio reported net sales declined 11%, while underlying net sales decreased 4% after adjusting for the negative effect of foreign exchange and an estimated net decrease in distributor inventories. The decline was due to discontinued agency brands, partially offset by growth of Chambord.

Non-branded and bulk. Reported net sales increased 19%, while underlying net sales increased 18% after adjusting for the positive effect of foreign exchange. Underlying net sales growth was driven by higher pricing of used barrels along with growth in contract bottling.

Year-over-Year Period Comparisons

Net Sales

Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31			3 Months
Change in reported net sales		96	%
~~Acquisitions and divestitures~~	New accounting standard	1	%
Foreign exchange		(12	%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories		(31	%)
Change in underlying net sales		69	%

Change in underlying net sales attributed to:
Volume		45	%
Net price/mix		24	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

For the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, net sales were ~~$723~~$766 million, an increase of ~~$62~~$43 million, or 9%6%, compared to the same period last year. ~~After~~Underlying net sales grew 9% after adjusting reported results for (a) the ~~net effect~~adoption of ~~acquisitions and loss of net sales related to our transition services for divested brands,~~the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the ~~positive~~negative effect of foreign exchange reflecting the strengthening of the dollar against the Turkish lira, British pound, euro, and Mexican peso, and (c) ~~the~~an estimated net increase in distributor ~~inventories, underlying net sales grew 6%.~~inventories. The change in underlying net sales was driven by 4%5% volume growth and 2%4% of price/mix. Volume growth was led by the Jack Daniel's family of brands, premium bourbons, and ~~the tequilas. Improved price/~~tequilas, partially offset by declines in Finlandia. Price/mix was driven by ~~a shift in sales to higher priced~~(a) favorable portfolio mix of fast growing higher-priced brands, most notably, ~~the Jack Daniel's family~~Woodford Reserve, and (b) higher average pricing on the Jack Daniel’s family of brands and tequilas.

The primary factors contributing to the growth in underlying net sales for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 were:

volumetric growth of JDTW in markets outside of the United States, most notably, the United Kingdom, Germany, Travel Retail, Turkey, Brazil, Spain, Poland, and Australia, with many of the European markets aided by tariff-related buy-ins;

growth of our ~~American whiskey portfolio~~premium bourbons in the United States and Travel Retail, led by Woodford Reserve and Old Forester;

higher volume of JD RTDs, led by continued momentum in Germany and the United States;

broad-based growth of JDTH and JDTF, most notably, the United Kingdom and the United States;

volumetric growth and higher pricing of our tequila brands in the United States, led by ~~the Jack Daniel’s family, Woodford Reserve,~~Herradura and ~~Old Forester;~~

~~JDTW in several international markets, most notably, Brazil, Poland, Travel Retail, Turkey, China, and Russia;~~

~~volume of JD RTDs, driven by~~el Jimador, which benefited from a buy-in ahead of price ~~increases in Australia~~increases;

higher pricing of used barrel and growth ~~in Germany, the United States,~~of contract bottling; and ~~the United Kingdom, with all markets benefiting from new RTD line extensions;~~

~~our tequila brands, led by (a) volume gains and higher prices of New Mix in Mexico; (b) volume gains of el Jimador~~JDTR in the United States, ~~and (c) higher volume and price of Herradura~~which launched in ~~the United States and Mexico; and~~

~~volume of used barrels, which is partially due to the timing of orders.~~September 2017.

These gains in underlying net sales were partially offset byby:

volume declines ~~in volume~~ of JDTW and Korbel Champagne in ~~Germany,~~the United States, the former of which is considered timing related;

declines of Finlandia in Poland due to ~~be timing related.~~customer buying patterns and disruption related to packaging changes; and

discontinued agency brand sales in Turkey.

Cost of Sales

Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31		3 Months
Change in reported cost of sales	116	%
~~Acquisitions and divestitures~~New accounting standard	3—	%
Foreign exchange	(53	%)
Estimated net change in distributor inventories	(31	%)
Change in underlying cost of sales	68	%

Change in underlying cost of sales attributed to:
Volume	45	%
Cost/mix	23	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

Cost of sales for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 increased ~~$22~~$13 million, or ~~11%~~6%, to ~~$230~~$243 million when compared to the same period last year. Underlying cost of sales increased 6%8% after adjusting reported costs for ~~(a)~~ the ~~net effect of acquisitions and divestitures, (b) the negative~~positive effect of foreign exchange and ~~(c) the~~an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying cost of sales for the three months ended July 31, 2018 was driven by higher volumes, ~~a shift in product mix to higher-cost brands, incremental~~

~~value-added packaging,~~higher bulk whiskey and contract bottling sales, and higher ~~wood costs.~~input costs including wood. Looking ahead to the remainder of fiscal 2019, we expect ~~that~~(a) input costs ~~will continue~~ to increase in the ~~low single digits.~~mid-single digits largely due to higher cost of agave and wood, and (b) higher costs related to tariffs.

Gross Profit

Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31		3 Months
Change in reported gross profit	96	%
~~Acquisitions and divestitures~~New accounting standard	—2	%
Foreign exchange	12	%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories	(31	%)
Change in underlying gross profit	69	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

Gross Margin

For the period ended July 31	3 months
Prior year gross margin	~~68.5~~68.1	%
Price/mix	~~0.1~~	%
~~Volume~~	—0.5	%
Cost	(0.1	%)
~~Acquisitions and divestitures~~New accounting standard	~~0.6~~(0.4	%)
Foreign exchange	~~(1.0~~0.1	%)
Change in gross margin	~~(0.4~~0.1	%)
Current year gross margin	~~68.1~~68.2	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

Gross profit of ~~$493~~$523 million increased ~~$40~~$30 million, or 9%6%, for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Underlying gross profit grew 6%9% after adjusting reported results for (a) the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and ~~the~~(c) an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The increase in underlying gross profit resulted from the same factors that contributed to the increase in underlying net sales and the increase in underlying cost of sales.

For the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, gross margin ~~decreased~~increased approximately ~~40 basis~~0.1 percentage points to ~~68.1%,~~68.2% from ~~68.5%~~68.1% in the same period last year driven ~~primarily~~ by ~~the negative effect of foreign exchange, partially~~favorable price/mix, mostly offset by the ~~net effect~~adoption of ~~acquisitions and divestitures.~~the revenue recognition accounting standard.

Operating Expenses
Three months ended July 31, 2017	Percentage change versus prior year period
	Reported		Acquisitions & Divestitures		Foreign Exchange		Underlying
Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31									Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31
3 Months									Reported		New Accounting Standard		Foreign Exchange		Underlying
Advertising	8	%	—	%	(1	%)	6	%	14	%	4	%	—	%	17	%
SG&A	(1	%)	—	%	—	%	(1	%)	4	%	—	%	—	%	5	%
Other expense (income), net	(85	%)	(3	%)	90	%	1	%
Total	4	%	—	%	(3	%)	1	%
Total operating expenses									5	%	2	%	2	%	9	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding
¹Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.									¹Operating expenses include advertising expense, SG&A expense, and other expense (income), net.

Operating expenses totaled ~~$249~~$259 million and increased $9$12 million, or 4%5%, for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating expenses grew 1%9% after adjusting for reclassifications related to the ~~net~~adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard and the positive effect of foreign ~~exchange driven by the absence of prior year foreign exchange gains in other expense (income).~~exchange.

Reported advertising expenses grew ~~8%, while underlying advertising expenses grew 6% after adjusting~~14% for ~~the negative effect of foreign exchange, as we continued to invest in our American whiskey portfolio, including the Jack Daniel's family and Woodford Reserve.~~

~~Reported and underlying~~ ~~SG&A expenses~~ ~~dropped 1% due to lower pension expense and continued tight management of discretionary spending, partially offset by personnel costs driven by investments in our new Spain distribution operation.~~

~~For~~ the three months ended July 31, ~~2017, operating~~2018, while underlying advertising expenses grew 17% after adjusting for reclassifications related to the adoption of the revenue recognition accounting standard. Underlying advertising expense increased as ~~a percentage of net sales declined 170 basis points to 34.5%, from 36.2% in the same period last year. The decline~~we invested in our ~~operating~~American whiskey brands, including the first year of our Woodford Reserve Kentucky Derby sponsorship.

Reported SG&A expenses ~~as a percentage~~ increased 4% for the three months ended July 31, 2018, while underlying SG&A expenses grew 5% after adjusting for reclassifications related to the adoption of ~~net sales~~the revenue recognition accounting standard. The increase in underlying SG&A expenses was driven by ~~the reduction in underlying SG&A spend, partially offset by the negative effect of foreign exchange.~~higher personnel costs.

Operating Income

Percentage change versus the prior year period ended July 31		3 Months
Change in reported operating income	147	%
~~Acquisitions and divestitures~~New accounting standard	(12	%)
Foreign exchange	52	%
Estimated net change in distributor inventories	(62	%)
Change in underlying operating income	1210	%
Note: Totals may differ due to rounding

Operating income of ~~$244~~$264 million increased ~~$31~~$18 million, or ~~14%~~7%, for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 compared to the same period last year. Underlying operating income grew ~~12%~~10% after adjusting for (a) the ~~net effect~~adoption of ~~acquisitions and divestitures,~~the revenue recognition accounting standard, (b) the negative effect of foreign exchange, and (c) ~~the~~an estimated net increase in distributor inventories. The same factors that contributed to the growth in underlying gross profit also contributed to the growth in underlying operating income, ~~partially offset by~~while an increase in total underlying operating ~~expenses.~~expenses partially offset these gains.

~~For~~Operating margin increased 0.5 percentage points to 34.5% for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017, operating margin increased 150 basis points to 33.7%,~~2018 from ~~32.2%~~34.0% in the same period last year. The increase in our operating margin was driven by ~~the reduction~~a slight increase in gross margin and operating expense leverage as underlying SG&A spend grew at a slower rate than underlying net sales, partially offset by ~~the negative effect of foreign exchange.~~underlying advertising expenses, which grew at a faster rate than underlying net sales.

The effective tax rate in the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~22.1%~~17.4% compared to ~~28.2%~~22.1% for the same period last year. The decrease in our effective tax rate was primarily driven by ~~(a) a~~the net impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (including the current year reduction into the provisional repatriation U.S. tax ~~for current and certain prior years on foreign exchange gains~~charge made in ~~non-U.S. entities due to a change in method of accounting for U.S. tax purposes, and (b)~~fiscal 2018), partially offset by an increase in ~~the beneficial impact of the excess~~ tax ~~benefits from stock-based awards. We expect our full year effective tax rate~~expense related to ~~be approximately 28% based on the tax rate of 29.0% on ordinary income for the full fiscal year as adjusted for known~~ discrete items.

Diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.46~~$0.41 in the three months ended July 31, ~~2017~~2018 increased ~~27%~~12% from the ~~$0.36~~$0.37 reported for the same period last year. The increase in diluted earnings per share for the three months ended July 31, 2018 resulted from an increase in reported operating income and the benefit of a lower effective tax rate, ~~and~~partially offset by higher interest expense reflecting a ~~reduction~~new bond issuance in ~~shares outstanding.~~April 2018.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

Cash flows. Cash and cash equivalents ~~increased $56~~decreased $28 million during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to an increase of ~~$196~~$56 million during the same period last year. Cash provided by operations of ~~$102~~$126 million was ~~down $26~~up $21 million from

the same period last year, largely reflecting an $18 million reduction in discretionary contributions to our qualified pension plans (which became fully funded as a ~~higher seasonal increase in working capital offset partially by higher earnings.~~ result of contributions made during the fourth quarter of last year).

Cash used for investing activities was ~~$28~~$25 million during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$324~~$31 million for the same ~~prior-year period.~~period last year. The ~~$296~~$6 million ~~decrease~~decline was largely ~~reflects $307 million in cash paid~~attributable to ~~acquire BenRiach in June 2016, partially offset by a $12 million increase in~~the timing of payments related to ongoing capital ~~spending during the current period.~~projects.

Cash used for financing activities was ~~$31~~$122 million during the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$398~~$31 million ~~in cash provided by financing activities during~~for the same ~~prior-year period.~~period last year. The ~~$429~~$91 million ~~change~~increase largely reflects ~~a $717 million decrease in proceeds from long-term debt, partially offset by a $200 million decline in share repurchases and~~ an ~~$88~~$86 million increase in net ~~proceeds from~~repayments of short-term ~~borrowings.~~

borrowings and a $6 million increase in dividend payments.

The impact on cash and cash equivalents as a result of exchange rate changes was ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$13~~$7 million for the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~a decline~~an increase of $6$13 million for the same period last year.

Liquidity. We continue to manage liquidity conservatively to meet current obligations, fund capital expenditures, ~~maintain~~sustain and grow our regular dividends, and ~~repurchase shares~~return cash to our shareholders from time to time through share repurchases and special dividends while reserving adequate debt capacity for acquisition opportunities.

In addition to our cash and cash equivalent balances, we have access to several liquidity sources to supplement our cash flow from operations. One of those sources is our $800 million commercial paper program that we regularly use to fund our short-term credit ~~needs and to maintain our access to the capital markets.~~needs. During the three months ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, our

commercial paper borrowings averaged ~~$486~~$463 million, with an average maturity of 2931 days and an average interest rate of ~~1.15%~~2.09%. Commercial paper outstanding was ~~$208~~$215 million at April 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~$253~~$161 million at July 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Our commercial paper program is supported by available commitments under our currently undrawn $800 million bank credit facility that ~~matures~~expires on November ~~20, 2018. Further, we believe that the markets for investment-grade bonds and private placements are accessible sources of long-term financing that could meet any additional liquidity needs.~~10, 2022. Although unlikely, under extreme market conditions, one or more participating banks may not be able to fully fund its commitments under our credit facility.

We believe the debt capital markets for bonds and private placements are accessible sources of long-term financing that could meet any additional liquidity needs. We believe our current liquidity position is sufficient to meet all of our future financial commitments. We have high credit standards when initiating transactions with counterparties, and we closely monitor our counterparty risks with respect to our cash balances and derivative contracts. If a counterparty’s credit quality were to deteriorate below our credit standards, we would expect either to liquidate exposures or require the counterparty to post appropriate collateral.

As of July 31, ~~2017, we had total~~2018, approximately 87% of our cash and cash equivalents ~~of $238 million. Of this amount, $180 million was~~were held by our foreign subsidiaries whose earnings we expect to reinvest indefinitely outside of the United States. ~~We do not expect to need~~With the ~~cash generated by those foreign subsidiaries to fund~~enactment of the Tax Act, we are evaluating our ~~domestic operations. In the unforeseen event that we were to repatriate cash from those foreign subsidiaries, we would be required to provide for~~global working capital requirements and ~~pay U.S. taxes on permanently repatriated earnings.~~may change our current permanent reinvestment assertion in future periods.

As announced on July ~~27, 2017,~~13, 2018, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock from July 13, 2018, through July 12, 2019, subject to market and other conditions. Under this program, we may repurchase shares from time to time for cash in open market purchases, block transactions, and privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. We can modify, suspend, or terminate this repurchase program at any time without prior notice. No shares were repurchased in the period from July 13, 2018 to July 31, 2018.

As announced on July 26, 2018, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of ~~$0.1825~~$0.158 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock. Stockholders of record on September ~~7, 2017,~~6, 2018 will receive the quarterly cash dividend on October ~~2, 2017.~~

We believe our current liquidity position is strong and sufficient to meet all of our future financial commitments. A quantitative covenant of our $800 million bank credit facility requires the ratio of consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement) to consolidated interest expense to be at least 3 to 1. As of July 31, 2017, with a ratio of 17 to 1, ~~we were well within the covenant’s parameters.~~2018.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks arising from adverse changes in (a) foreign exchange rates, (b) commodity prices affecting the cost of our raw materials and energy, and (c) interest rates. We try to manage risk through a variety of strategies, including production initiatives and hedging strategies. Our foreign currency hedging contracts are subject to ~~changes in~~foreign exchange ~~rates,~~rate changes, our commodity forward purchase contracts are subject to ~~changes in~~ commodity ~~prices,~~price changes, and some of our debt obligations are subject to ~~changes in~~ interest ~~rates.~~rate changes. Established procedures and internal processes govern the management of these market risks. Since April 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there have been no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) (our principal executive and principal financial officers), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures: (a) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (b) include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including the CEO and the CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We operate in a litigious environment and we are sued in the normal course of business. We do not anticipate that any ~~currently~~ pending suits will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or future results. There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our ~~2017~~2018 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that we acquired during the quarter ended July 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
May 1, 2017 – May 31, 2017 23,904
$ 48.06
—
$ —
June 1, 2017 – June 30, 2017 —
$ —
—
$ —
July 1, 2017 – July 31, 2017 1,054
$ 49.38
—
$ —
Total 24,958
$ 48.12
—



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased under the Plans or Programs
May 1, 2018 – May 31, 2018	17,116	$	53.90	—	$	—
June 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018	92,658	$	53.63	—	$	—
July 1, 2018 – July 31, 2018	—	$	—	—	$	200,000,000
Total	109,774	$	53.67	—

The shares presented in the above table were acquired from employees to satisfy income tax withholdings triggered by the vesting of restricted shares.

As announced on July 13, 2018, our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock from July 13, 2018, through July 12, 2019, subject to market and other conditions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following documents are filed with this Report:



31.1		CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32		CEO and CFO Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (not considered to be filed).
101		The following materials from Brown-Forman Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (a) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (c) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (e) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION
		(Registrant)

Date:	August ~~30, 2017~~29, 2018	By:	/s/ Jane C. Morreau
			Jane C. Morreau
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(On behalf of the Registrant and as Principal Financial Officer)

2938



(Dollars in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
April 30, 2017:
Assets:
Currency derivatives	$	—	$	25	$	—	$	25
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives	—		10		—		10
Short-term borrowings	—		211		—		211
Current portion of long-term debt	—		249		—		249
Long-term debt	—		1,752		—		1,752
July 31, 2017:
Assets:
Currency derivatives	—		9		—		9
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives	—		28		—		28
Short-term borrowings	—		258		—		258
Current portion of long-term debt	—		250		—		250
Long-term debt	—		1,792		—		1,792



	April 30, 2017				July 31, 2017
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
(Dollars in millions)	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	182	$	182	$	238	$	238
Currency derivatives	25		25		9		9
Liabilities:
Currency derivatives	10		10		28		28
Short-term borrowings	211		211		258		258
Current portion of long-term debt	249		249		250		250
Long-term debt	1,689		1,752		1,720		1,792