Index

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q
(mark one)

þ     Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended February 25,September 2, 2017

OR

¨     Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number:  000-04892

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 64-0500378
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

3320 Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi  39209
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(601) 948-6813
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ      No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    
Large Accelerated filer þ
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
   
Non – Accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨    No þ

There were 43,776,55143,772,428 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, and 4,800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of March 24,September 29, 2017.


Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 25,SEPTEMBER 2, 2017
     Page Number
Part I.    
      
 Item 1.   
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 3.  
      
 Item 4.  
      
Part II.    
      
 Item 1.  
      
 Item 1A.  
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 6.  
      
    



Index

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
 February 25, 2017 May 28, 2016 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
 (unaudited)   (unaudited)  
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $31,905
 $29,046
 $18,943
 $17,564
Investment securities available-for-sale 157,670
 360,499
 107,028
 138,462
Trade and other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of  
  
  
  
$368 and $727 at February 25, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively) 79,179
 67,448
$435 and $386 at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively) 75,626
 64,509
Income tax receivable 49,919
 11,830
 55,970
 52,691
Inventories 163,818
 154,799
 159,226
 160,692
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,310
 2,661
 3,753
 2,288
Total current assets 484,801
 626,283
 420,546
 436,206
Property, plant and equipment, net 461,378
 392,274
 452,099
 458,184
Other investments 69,435
 69,296
Goodwill 35,432
 29,196
 35,525
 35,525
Other investments 68,832
 53,975
Other intangible assets, net 29,920
 4,958
 28,590
 29,149
Other assets 4,912
 5,079
 4,833
 4,734
TOTAL ASSETS $1,085,275
 $1,111,765
 $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $77,128
 $67,131
 $58,386
 $59,853
Current maturities of long-term debt 15,449
 16,320
 4,683
 4,826
Total current liabilities 92,577
 83,451
 63,069
 64,679
Long-term debt, less current maturities 7,302
 9,250
 5,048
 6,113
Other noncurrent liabilities 6,834
 6,321
 7,565
 7,527
Deferred income taxes 110,200
 95,382
 105,881
 110,282
Total liabilities 216,913
 194,404
 181,563
 188,601
  
  
  
  
Commitments and Contingencies - see Note 5 

 

Commitments and Contingencies - see Note 4 

 

        
Stockholders’ equity:  
  
  
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 120,000 and 70,261 shares authorized and issued  
  
  
  
at February 25, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively, and 43,777 and 43,737  
  
shares outstanding at February 25, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively 703
 703
at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively, and 43,773 and 43,777  
  
shares outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively 703
 703
Class A convertible common stock, $.01 par value, 4,800 shares authorized, issued  
  
  
  
and outstanding at February 25, 2017 and May 28, 2016, respectively  48
 48
and outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively  48
 48
Paid-in capital 48,985
 46,404
 50,792
 49,932
Retained earnings 840,517
 890,440
 800,053
 816,046
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 76
 (48)
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,484 and 26,524 shares at February 25, 2017  
  
and May 28, 2016, respectively (23,913) (22,272)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (96) (128)
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,488 and 26,484 shares at September 3, 2017  
  
and June 3, 2017, respectively (23,936) (23,914)
Total Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. stockholders’ equity 866,416
 915,275
 827,564
 842,687
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities 1,946
 2,086
 1,901
 1,806
Total stockholders’ equity 868,362
 917,361
 829,465
 844,493
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,085,275
 $1,111,765
 $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net sales $306,540
 $449,760
 $799,929
 $1,605,630
 $262,845
 $239,845
Cost of sales 267,375
 317,034
 766,385
 998,236
 245,509
 249,414
Gross profit 39,165
 132,726
 33,544
 607,394
Gross profit (loss) 17,336
 (9,569)
Selling, general, and administrative expense 43,738
 46,955
 125,985
 135,356
 41,710
 40,256
Operating income (loss) (4,573) 85,771
 (92,441) 472,038
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 4
 525
Operating loss (24,378) (50,350)
Other income (expense):      
  
  
  
Interest income, net 411
 1,377
 2,283
 2,020
 474
 1,091
Royalty income 381
 362
 1,111
 1,266
 278
 406
Patronage income 7,608
 6,879
 7,608
 6,879
Equity in income of affiliates 1,018
 1,542
 1,854
 3,574
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (353) 191
Other, net (680) 1,584
 (1,558) 404
 (538) 122
Total other income 8,738
 11,744
 11,298
 14,143
Total other income (loss) (139) 1,810
            
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 4,165
 97,515
 (81,143) 486,181
Income tax expense (benefit) 34
 33,173
 (31,327) 167,839
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest 4,131
 64,342
 (49,816) 318,342
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (8) 178
 (9) 1,925
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $4,139
 $64,164
 $(49,807) $316,417
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (24,517) (48,540)
Income tax benefit 8,340
 17,560
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (16,177) (30,980)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936)
            
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:      
  
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
Basic $0.09
 $1.33
 $(1.03) $6.57
 $(0.33) $(0.64)
Diluted $0.09
 $1.33
 $(1.03) $6.54
 $(0.33) $(0.64)
Dividends per common share $
 $0.441
 $
 $2.175
Weighted average shares outstanding:      
  
  
  
Basic 48,286
 48,204
 48,285
 48,177
 48,330
 48,249
Diluted 48,417
 48,367
 48,285
 48,359
 48,330
 48,249

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016
Net income (loss), including noncontrolling interests $4,131
 $64,342
 $(49,816) $318,342
      
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:      
  
      
  
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments 233
 (897) 199
 (1,355)
      
  
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (89) 341
 (75) 521
      
  
Other comprehensive gain (loss), net of  tax 144
 (556) 124
 (834)
      
  
Comprehensive income (loss) 4,275
 63,786
 (49,692) 317,508
      
  
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest (8) 178
 (9) 1,925
      
  
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $4,283
 $63,608
 $(49,683) $315,583
  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net loss, including noncontrolling interests $(16,177) $(30,980)
   
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:  
  
   
  
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments 51
 502
   
  
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (19) (191)
   
  
Other comprehensive gain, net of  tax 32
 311
   
  
Comprehensive loss (16,145) (30,669)
   
  
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
   
  
Comprehensive loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,961) $(30,625)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Operating activities:        
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest $(49,816) $318,342
Net loss including noncontrolling interest $(16,177) $(30,980)
Depreciation and amortization 35,724
 33,185
 13,137
 11,159
Other adjustments, net (43,125) (18,807) (18,447) (25,626)
Net cash provided by (used in) operations (57,217) 332,720
Net cash used in operations (21,487) (45,447)
  
  
  
  
Investing activities:  
  
  
  
Purchase of investments (25,872) (352,315) (2,653) (9,008)
Sales of investments 228,327
 221,879
 34,104
 92,833
Acquisition of business (68,643) 
Investment in joint ventures (17,700) (29,209) (1,200) (5,500)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (54,862) (55,119) (6,517) (23,895)
Payments received on notes receivable and from affiliates 5,236
 4,677
 8
 1,250
Net proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 76
 2,724
 74
 10
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 66,562
 (207,363)
Net cash provided by investing activities 23,816
 55,690
  
  
  
  
Financing activities:   
  
  
  
Purchase of common stock by treasury (1,715) (1,831) (21) (40)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests (73) (903)
Contributions from (distributions to) noncontrolling interests 279
 (73)
Principal payments on long-term debt (4,698) (23,620) (1,208) (1,530)
Payments of dividends 
 (99,531)
Net cash used in financing activities (6,486) (125,885) (950) (1,643)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 2,859
 (528) 1,379
 8,600
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 29,046
 8,667
 17,564
 29,046
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $31,905
 $8,139
 $18,943
 $37,646

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
February 25,September 2, 2017
(unaudited)
1.   Presentation of Interim Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affected reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.  Operating results for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 3, 2017.2, 2018.  

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.  It does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.��

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

2.   Acquisitions

Foodonics Acquisition

On October 16, 2016, the Company acquired substantially all of the egg production assets and assumed certain liabilities of Foodonics International, Inc. and its related entities doing business as Dixie Egg Company (collectively, "Foodonics") for $68.6 million of cash and $3.0 million of deferred purchase price. The acquired assets include commercial egg production and processing facilities with capacity for 1.6 million laying hens, contract grower arrangements for an additional 1.5 million laying hens, and related feed production, milling and distribution facilities in Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. The Company also acquired Foodonics' interest in American Egg Products, LLC ("AEP") and the Eggland's Best franchise with licensing rights for certain markets in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia as well as Puerto Rico, Bahamas and Cuba. The Company now owns 100% of AEP. The acquired operations of Foodonics are included in the accompanying financial statements as of October 16, 2016.

Pending the finalization of the Company's valuation, the following table presents the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
Inventory $7,669
Property, plant and equipment 38,683
Intangible assets 24,000
Liabilities assumed (2,005)
Total identifiable net assets 68,347
Goodwill 3,296
Purchase price 71,643
Deferred purchase price (3,000)
Cash consideration paid $68,643


Happy Hen Acquisition

On February 19, 2017, the Company assumed operational control of substantially all of the egg production, processing and distribution assets of Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Happy Hen"). The assets include commercial egg production and processing facilities with current capacity for 350,000 laying hens and related distribution facilities located near Harwood and Wharton, Texas. The site is designed for capacity of up to 1.2 million laying hens. The operations of Happy Hen are included in the accompanying financial statements as of February 19, 2017. The purchase price is recorded in "Accounts payable and other accrued expenses" on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 25, 2017. The Company closed this acquisition on March 3, 2017.

Pending the finalization of the Company's valuation, the following table presents the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired (in thousands):

Inventory $609
Property, plant and equipment 11,259
Intangible assets 2,400
Total identifiable net assets 14,268
Goodwill 2,940
Purchase price $17,208

These fair value measurements were primarily based on significant inputs that are not observable in the markets.  The cost approach, which estimates value by determining the current cost of replacing an asset with another of equivalent economic utility, was utilized for certain property, plant and equipment.  The cost to replace given assets reflects the estimated reproduction or replacement cost of the asset, less an allowance for loss in value due to depreciation.  The market approach, which indicates value for a subject asset based on available market pricing for comparable assets, was utilized for inventory and the Eggland's Best franchise of Foodonics. The cost of the Eggland's Best franchise will be amortized over a period of 15 years. Customer relationships and trademarks will be amortized over a period of 8 years. Non-compete agreements will be amortized over a period of 10 years. Goodwill on business combination recognizes the difference in the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, net of the acquisition price. Goodwill associated with the acquisition is tax deductible over 15 years.

Pro-forma information, which is usually presented for information purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would have been achieved had the acquisition been completed as of an earlier time, was not material to the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3.   Stock Based Compensation

Total stock based compensation expense for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016 was $2.5 million$859,000 and $2.2 million,$848,000, respectively. 

Unrecognized compensation expense as a result of non-vested shares of the 2012 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan at February 25,September 2, 2017 was $6.9$4.9 million and will be recorded over a weighted average period of 2.31.9 years.  Refer to Note 1110 of our May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our stock compensation plans.

At February 25,September 2, 2017, there were 247,735243,150 restricted shares outstanding, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $42.76 per share. A summary of theThe Company’s restricted share activity for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 follows:

 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding, May 28, 2016 288,900
 $35.97
Outstanding, June 3, 2017 247,735
 $42.76
Granted 86,215
 43.00
 
 
Vested (121,148) 26.90
 (1,750) 42.10
Forfeited (6,232) 39.66
 (2,835) 42.94
Outstanding, February 25, 2017 247,735
 $42.76
Outstanding, September 2, 2017 243,150
 $42.76

4.3.   Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
 February 25, 2017 May 28, 2016
Flocks $98,822
 $94,312
Eggs and egg products 16,297
 11,519
Feed and supplies 48,699
 48,968
 $163,818
 $154,799

  September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
Flocks $97,108
 $98,059
Eggs and egg products 14,697
 14,911
Feed and supplies 47,421
 47,722
  $159,226
 $160,692

We grow and maintain flocks of layers (mature female chickens), pullets (young female(female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), and breeders (male and female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks). Our total flock at February 25,September 2, 2017, consisted of approximately 8.59.1 million pullets and breeders and 38.136.7 million layers.

5.4.   Contingencies

Financial Instruments
The Company maintained standby letters of credit (“LOC”) totaling $3.7$4.2 million at February 25,September 2, 2017.  The LOCs are collateralized with cash which is included in the line item “Other assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.    The outstanding LOCs are for the benefit of certain insurance companies, and are not recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets.

Legal Contingencies
The Company is a defendant in certain legal actions, and intends to vigorously defend its position in these actions.  If the Company’s assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, the estimated liability is accrued in the Company’s financial statements.    If the assessment indicates a potential material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or probable but cannot be reasonably estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss will be disclosed, or a statement will be made that such an estimate cannot be made.

These legal actions are discussed in detail at Part II, Item 1, of this report.


6.5.   Net Income (Loss)Loss per Common Share  

Basic net income (loss)loss per share was calculated by dividing net income (loss)loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income (loss)loss per share was calculated by dividing net income (loss)loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of options and restricted stock.  Due to the net loss in the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and August 27, 2016, restricted shares in the amount of 145,044112,353 and 140,551, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earningsnet loss per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.  The computations of basic and diluted net income (loss)loss per share attributable to the Company are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $4,139
 $64,164
 $(49,807) $316,417
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936)
      
  
  
  
Basic weighted-average common shares 48,286
 48,204
 48,285
 48,177
 48,330
 48,249
Effect of dilutive securities:      
  
  
  
Restricted shares 131
 163
 
 182
 
 
Dilutive potential common shares 48,417
 48,367
 48,285
 48,359
 48,330
 48,249
      
  
  
  
Net income (loss) per common share      
  
attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:      
  
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
Basic $0.09
 $1.33
 $(1.03) $6.57
 $(0.33) $(0.64)
Diluted $0.09
 $1.33
 $(1.03) $6.54
 $(0.33) $(0.64)

7.6.   Accrued Dividends Payable and Dividends per Common Share

We make an accrual of dividends payable at the end of each quarter according to the Company’s dividend policy adopted by its Board of Directors. The Company pays a dividend to shareholders of its Common Stock and Class A Common Stock on a quarterly basis for each quarter for which the Company reports net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of such quarterly income. Dividends are paid to shareholders of record as of the 60th day following the last day of such quarter, except for the fourth fiscal quarter.  For the fourth quarter, the Company pays dividends to shareholders of record on the 65th day after the quarter end. Dividends are payable on the 15th day following the record date. Following a quarter for which the Company does not report net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., the Company will not pay a dividend for a subsequent profitable quarter until the Company is profitable on a cumulative basis computed from the date of the last quarter for which a dividend was paid. Therefore, the Company did not pay a dividend with respect to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, or the first and second quartersany quarter of fiscal 2017, and will not pay a dividend for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2017.2018. At February 25,September 2, 2017, cumulative losses that must be recovered prior to paying a dividend were $50.2$90.6 million.    When applicable, the amount of the accrual appears on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Accrued dividends payable.”


On our condensed consolidated statement of operations, we determine dividends per common share in accordance with the computation in the following table (in thousands, except per share data):
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $4,139
 $64,164
 $(49,807) $316,417
  
  
    
1/3 of net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. available for dividend 
 21,388
 
 105,472
  
  
    
Common stock outstanding (shares) 43,777
 43,738
    
Class A common stock outstanding (shares) 4,800
 4,800
    
Total common stock outstanding (shares) 48,577
 48,538
    
  
  
    
Dividends per common share* $
 $0.441
 $
 $2.175

*Dividends per common share =1/3of Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. available for dividend÷ Total common stock outstanding (shares). At February 25, 2017 , cumulative losses that must be recovered prior to paying a dividend were $50.2 million.


8.7.   Fair Value Measurements

The Company is required to categorize both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy.  The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable, and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

The disclosuredisclosures of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at cost are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt: The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is at its stated value.  We have not elected to carry our long-term debt at fair value.  Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, which are level 2 inputs. Estimated fair values are management’s estimate, which is a level 3 input; however, when there is no readily available market data, the estimated fair values may not represent the amounts that could be realized in a current transaction, and the fair values could change significantly. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s borrowings under its long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):
 February 25, 2017 May 28, 2016
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
5.4% – 6.4% Notes payable $20,980
 $21,028
 $25,570
 $25,824
4.9% – 5.97% Capital leases payable 1,771
 1,589
 
 
 $22,751
 $22,617
 $25,570
 $25,824

  September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
  Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
5.4% – 6.2% Notes payable $8,125
 $8,161
 $9,250
 $9,295
Long-term leases 1,606
 1,445
 1,689
 1,520
  $9,731
 $9,606
 $10,939
 $10,815

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of February 25,September 2, 2017 and May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
໿
       Total       Total
February 25, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
September 2, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations 
 $17,062
 
 $17,062
 
 $20,872
 
 $20,872
Municipal bonds 
 47,011
 
 47,011
 
 29,100
 
 29,100
Corporate bonds 
 85,752
 
 85,752
 
 53,976
 
 53,976
Foreign government obligations 
 2,008
 
 2,008
Asset backed securities 
 5,837
 
 5,837
 
 3,080
 
 3,080
Mutual funds 2,487
 
 
 2,487
 2,509
 
 
 2,509
Total assets measured at fair value $2,487
 $157,670
 
 $160,157
 $2,509
 $107,028
 
 $109,537
໿
       Total       Total
May 28, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
June 3, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations $
 $18,814
 $
 $18,814
 $
 $20,216
 $
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 
 79,643
 
 79,643
 
 36,873
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 
 240,537
 
 240,537
 
 75,790
 
 75,790
Foreign government obligations 
 2,046
 
 2,046
Asset backed securities 
 15,893
 
 15,893
 
 5,583
 
 5,583
Mutual funds 5,503
 
 
 5,503
 2,459
 
 
 2,459
Total assets measured at fair value $5,503
 $356,933
 $
 $362,436
 $2,459
 $138,462
 $
 $140,921

Investment securities – available-for-sale, classified as level 2, consist of U.S. government and agency obligations, taxable and tax exempt municipal bonds, zero coupon municipal bonds, foreign government obligations, asset backed securities and corporate bonds with maturities of three months or longer when purchased. We classify these securities as current, because amounts invested are available for current operations. Observable inputs for these securities are yields, credit risks, default rates, and volatility.

໿
໿
9.8.   Investment Securities

The following represents the Company’s investment securities as of February 25,September 2, 2017 and May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
February 25, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $17,089
 $
 $27
 $17,062
Municipal bonds 46,981
 30
 
 47,011
Corporate bonds 85,703
 49
 
 85,752
Foreign government obligations 2,009
 
 1
 2,008
Asset backed securities 5,837
 
 
 5,837
Total current investment securities $157,619
 $79
 $28
 $157,670
  
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,751
 $736
 $
 $2,487
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,751
 $736
 $
 $2,487

May 28, 2016 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
September 2, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $18,809
 $5
 $
 $18,814
 $20,906
 $
 $34
 $20,872
Municipal bonds 79,481
 162
 
 79,643
 29,069
 31
 
 29,100
Corporate bonds 240,593
 
 56
 240,537
 53,948
 28
 
 53,976
Foreign government obligations 2,044
 2
 
 2,046
Asset backed securities 15,908
 
 15
 15,893
 3,081
 
 1
 3,080
Mutual funds 3,565
 1
 
 3,566
Total current investment securities $360,400
 $170
 $71
 $360,499
 $107,004
 $59
 $35
 $107,028
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,448
 $489
 $
 $1,937
 $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,448
 $489
 $
 $1,937
 $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
June 3, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $20,259
 $
 $43
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 36,839
 34
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 75,769
 21
 
 75,790
Asset backed securities 5,583
 
 
 5,583
Total current investment securities $138,450
 $55
 $43
 $138,462
   
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities were $228.3$34.1 million and $221.9$92.8 million during the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016, respectively. Gross realized gains during the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016 were $231,000$16,000 and $100,000,$231,000, respectively.  Gross realized losses during the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016 were $6,000zero and $102,000,$6,000, respectively. For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Unrealized holding gains and (losses), net of taxes, for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Current investments $(30) $(740) $8
 $271
Noncurrent investments 154
 (94) 24
 40
Total unrealized holding gains (losses) $124
 $(834)
Total unrealized holding gains $32
 $311

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.  Contractual maturities at February 25,September 2, 2017, are as follows (in thousands):
 Estimated Fair Value Estimated Fair Value
Within one year  $84,966
 $73,204
1-5 years 72,704
 33,824
Total $157,670
 $107,028

໿

10.9.   Equity

The following reflects the equity activity, including our noncontrolling interest, for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 (in thousands):
໿
 Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders    
 Common Stock        
  
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling  
 Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Income Earnings Interest Total
Balance at May 28, 2016 $703
 $48
 $(22,272) $46,404
 $(48) $890,440
 $2,086
 $917,361
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 
 
 
 
 124
 
 
 124
Grant of restricted stock 
 
 78
 (78) 
 
 
 
Forfeiture of restricted stock 
 
 (4) 4
 
 
 
 
Buyback of 39,913 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (1,715) 
 
 
 
 (1,715)
Distribution to noncontrolling interest partners 
 
 
 
 
 
 (73) (73)
Restricted stock compensation 
 
 
 2,481
 
 
 
 2,481
Reclass of equity portion of American Egg Products in connection with acquisition, see Note 2 
 
 
 
 
 58
 (58) 
Cumulative adjustment to restricted stock compensation from the adoption of ASU 2016-09 
 
 
 174
 
 (174) 
 
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 (49,807) (9) (49,816)
Balance at February 25, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,913) $48,985
 $76
 $840,517
 $1,946
 $868,362

11. Subsequent Event

Subsequent to February 25, 2017, the Company received payment of claims related to the Deepwater Horizon Economic and Property Damages Settlement Program (the "Settlement Program"). Our recovery, net of applicable fees, was $5.5 million and will be recorded in our fourth quarter results.

  Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders    
  Common Stock        
   
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling  
  Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Income Earnings Interest Total
Balance at June 3, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,914) $49,932
 $(128) $816,046
 $1,806
 $844,493
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 
 
 
 
 32
 
 
 32
Forfeiture of restricted stock 
 
 (1) 1
 
 
 
 
Buyback of 519 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (21) 
 
 
 
 (21)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest partners 
 
 
 
 
 
 279
 279
Restricted stock compensation 
 
 
 859
 
 
 
 859
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (15,993) (184) (16,177)
Balance at September 2, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,936) $50,792
 $(96) $800,053
 $1,901
 $829,465

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) relating to our shell egg business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules, projected construction costs, and other operating data, including anticipated results of operations and financial condition.  Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plans,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” or similar words.  Actual production, operating schedules, capital costs, results of operations, and other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements are based on management’s current intent, belief, expectations, estimates, and projections regarding the Company and its industry.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control.  The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, among others, (i) the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016,June 3, 2017, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the shell egg business (including disease, pests, weather conditions, and potential for product recall), (iii) changes in the demand for and market prices of shell eggs and feed costs, (iv) our ability to predict and meet demand for cage-free and other specialty eggs, (v) risks, changes, or obligations that could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses and risks or changes that may cause conditions to completing a pending acquisition not to be met, and (vi) adverse results in pending litigation matters.  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because, while we believe the assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate.  Further, forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the respective dates thereof, or if no date is stated, as of the date hereof.  Except as otherwise required by law, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise.

OVERVIEW

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the production, grading, packaging, marketing, and distribution of fresh shell eggs.  Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
 

Our operations are fully integrated.  At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male and female birds used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks), manufacture feed, and produce, process, and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in the United States (U.S.("U.S.").  We market the majority of our shell eggs in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western, and mid-Atlantic regions of the U.S.  We market shell eggs through an extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice distributors, and egg product consumers.    

The Company has one operating segment, which is the production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of shell eggs.  The majority of our customers rely on us to provide most of their shell egg needs, including specialty and non-specialty eggs. Specialty eggs represent a broad range of products.  We classify nutritionally enhanced, cage free, organic and brown eggs as specialty products for accounting and reporting purposes. We classify all other shell eggs as non-specialty products.  While we report separate sales information for these types of eggs, we note there are a number of cost factors which are not specifically available for non-specialty or specialty eggs due to the nature of egg production. We manage our operations and allocate resources to these types of eggs on a consolidated basis based on the demands of our customers.
 

Our operating results are directly tied to egg prices, which are highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, and are outside of our control. For example, the annual average Urner-Barry Southeastern Regional Large Egg Market Price per dozen eggs, for our fiscal years 2005-20162005-2017 ranged from a low of $0.72 in fiscal year 2005 to a high of $2.97 in fiscal year 2016.  The shell egg industry has traditionally been subject to periods of high profitability followed by periods of significant loss. In the past, during periods of high profitability, shell egg producers tended to increase the number of layers in production with a resulting increase in the supply of shell eggs, which generally caused a drop in shell egg prices until supply and demand returned to balance.  As a result, our financial results from year to year may vary significantly.   Shorter term, retail sales of shell eggs historically have been greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months.  Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal factors and a natural increase in shell egg production in the spring and early summer.  Shell egg prices tend to increase with the start of the school year and are highest prior to holiday periods, particularly Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter.  Consequently, we generally experience lower sales and net income in our first and fourth fiscal quarters ending in August and May, respectively. Because of the seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, comparisons of our sales and operating results between different quarters within a single fiscal year are not necessarily meaningful comparisons.  

From April through JuneIn 2015, our industry experienced a significant avian influenza (“AI”) outbreak, primarily in the upper Midwestern U.S.  There were no positive tests for AI at any of our locations. Based on several published industry estimates, we believe approximately 12% of the national flock of laying hens was affected.  TheDuring April through June 2015, the affected laying hens were either destroyed by the disease or euthanized.  During April through June 2015, theThe USDA data showed the supply of laying hens decreased substantially, and thensubstantially. Since that time, hen numbers began to recover and approacheventually exceed pre-AI levels.

levels by late 2016. In February 2017, the USDA issued revised data that showed the size of the laying hen flock for calendar years 2015 and 2016 was meaningfully higher in both years than previously reported. At March 1, 2017, the national laying hen flock according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture was approximately 3.1% higher than the AI reduced flock on March 1, 2016.  

Egg prices increased significantly during the summer and fall of 2015. The average Urner-Barry Thursday price for the large market (i.e. conventional shell eggs) in the southeastern region for the months of June through November 2015 was $2.32 per dozen, with a peak of $2.97 in August.  Subsequent to November 2015, shell egg prices declined.  The Urner Barry price index ("UB index") hit a decade-low level in both our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter and fiscal 2017 second quarter. During our fiscal 2018 first quarter, the UB index averaged $0.94 per dozen, a 25.3% increase over the prior year period average of fiscal 2017 it increased slightly, but$0.75 per dozen. In spite of this increase, the index remained at significantly lower levels thanbelow historical levels. Subsequent to the corresponding periodend of last year.  During our fiscal 2017 second2018 first quarter it returnedhas continued to and dropped below the low levels seen during the fiscal 2016 fourth quarter. Early in our fiscal 2017 third quarter we saw a significant increase but prices dropped again after Christmas.increase.

According to Nielsen data, retail customer demand for shell eggs has remained strong. The USDA reports that egg export demand has improved since the beginning of fiscal 2017,2017; however, it has still not fully recovered fromto levels prior to the AI outbreak. Additionally, we havethe industry experienced reduced demand for egg products, as many of our commercial customers reformulated their products to use fewer eggs when prices spiked and have been slow to resume previous egg usage. Together with the increased supply of hens, these factors have created an oversupply of eggs, with continued pressure on

market prices. However, recentRecently, increasing exports have returned to historical levels, although they remain below the peaks seen just prior to the AI outbreak, and USDA reports show the chick hatch has been trending down, suggesting there may be a moderation in the size of the laying hen flock as the year progresses.  We expect the egg markets to remain under pressure and we do not expect to see any meaningful improvement until there is a better balance of supply and demand.over time. Accordingly, our net average selling pricesprice for shell eggs for the thirdfirst quarter and year to date periods of fiscal 2017 were $1.130 and $1.0202018 was $1.017 compared with $1.568 and $1.919$0.952 for the corresponding periodsperiod of fiscal 2016, respectively.

Over the past month, there have been reported outbreaks of AI2017. While overall market conditions are more favorable than a year ago, we do not expect any sustained improvement in certain poultry operations located in southeastern states. None of these outbreaks have affected the commercial laying hen flock, and there have been no positive tests for AI at any of our locations. Since the spring 2015 AI outbreaks,pricing until we have significantly enhanced biosecurity measures at all of our locations,a more stable supply and our flocks are being monitored and tested according to state and federal guidelines. We continue to work closely with state and federal agencies and other interested parties to monitor developments and seek to prevent the occurrence of the disease at our facilities.

demand balance.

We are one of the largest producers and marketers of value-added specialty shell eggs in the U.S. They have been a significant and growing portion of the market in recent years. During our fiscal 2016 a number of large restaurant chains, food service companies and grocery chains, including our largest customers, announced goals to transition to a cage-free egg supply chain by specified future dates. We are working with our customers to achieve smooth progress in meeting their goals. Our focus for future expansion at our farms will be environments that are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be converted to cage-free, based on a timeline to meet our customer’s needs.

For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, we produced approximately 84%86% of the total number of shell eggs we sold.  This comparessold compared to 77%82% in the comparable prior year period.  We produced 7.4% more dozens during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017 than in the corresponding period of last year. For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, approximately 7%9% of such production was provided by contract producers who utilize their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned by us compared to 4%5% for the same period of last year. This increase represents contract production acquired with our fiscal 2017 acquisitions. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements.

Our cost of production is materially affected by feed costs.  Feed costs averaged approximately 58%55% of our total farm egg production cost for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared to 60% for the same period of fiscal 2017. Changes in market prices for corn and soybean meal, the primary ingredients in the feed we use, result in changes in our cost of goods sold.   The cost of our feed ingredients, which are commodities, are subject to factors over which we have little or no control such as volatile price changes caused by weather, size of harvest, transportation and storage costs, demand, and the agricultural and energy policies of the U.S. and foreign governments.  Increased U.S. acreage and large per acre yields for bothWe anticipate significant corn and soybeanssoybean crops in 2017, which combined with the large 2016 crops should provide an adequate domestic supplies for bothsupply of our primary feed ingredients.ingredients in fiscal 2018. 

DuringWhile the secondrecent hurricanes that hit the United States following the end of our first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the egg production assets of Foodonics International, Inc. and its related entities doing business as Dixie Egg Company ("Foodonics") for $68.6 million of cash and $3.0 million of deferred purchase price. The acquired assets include commercial egg production and processing facilities with capacity for 1.6 million laying hens, contract grower arrangements for an additional 1.5 million laying hens, and related feed production, milling and distribution facilities2018 caused disruptions to our operations in Georgia, Alabama, and Florida. The Company also acquired Foodonics' interest in American Egg Products, LLC ("AEP") and the Eggland's Best franchise with licensing rights for portions of certain markets in Alabama,Texas, Florida and Georgia, as well as Puerto Rico, Bahamas and Cuba. The Company now owns 100%we did not sustain any material loss of AEP. The acquired operations of Foodonics are included in the accompanying financial statements as of October 16, 2016, the effective date of the transaction.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company assumed operational control of substantially all of the egg production, processing and distribution assets of Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, "Happy Hen"). The assets include commercial egg production and processing facilities with current capacity for 350,000 laying hens and related distribution facilities located near Harwood and Wharton, Texas. The site is designed for capacity of up to 1.2 million laying hens. The operations of Happy Hen are included in the accompanying financial statements as of February 19, 2017. The purchase price is recorded in "Accounts payable and other accrued expenses" on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 25, 2017. The Company closed this acquisition on March 3, 2017.production.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.

  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 93.4 % 104.0 %
Gross profit (loss) 6.6 % (4.0)%
Selling, general, and administrative expense 15.9 % 16.8 %
Operating loss (9.3)% (20.8)%
Other income (expense), net (0.1)% 0.8 %
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (9.4)% (20.0)%
Income tax benefit 3.2 % 7.3 %
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (12.6)% (27.3)%
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (0.1)%  %
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (12.5)% (27.3)%

 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0% 100.0 % 100.0%
Cost of sales 87.2 % 70.5% 95.8 % 62.2%
Gross profit 12.8 % 29.5% 4.2 % 37.8%
Selling, general, and administrative expense 14.3 % 10.4% 15.7 % 8.4%
Operating income (loss) (1.5)% 19.1% (11.5)% 29.4%
Other income (expense), net 2.9 % 2.6% 1.4 % 0.9%
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 1.4 % 21.7% (10.1)% 30.3%
Income tax expense (benefit)  % 7.4% (3.9)% 10.5%
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest 1.4 % 14.3% (6.2)% 19.8%
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  % %  % 0.1%
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 1.4 % 14.3% (6.2)% 19.7%

NET SALES

Shell eggs and egg products made up approximately 98% and 2% of net sales, respectively, for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017.  Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 were $306.5$262.8 million, a decreasean increase of $143.3$23.0 million, or 31.8%9.6%, compared to net sales of $449.8$239.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended FebruaryAugust 27, 2016,2016. The increase was primarily due to the decreasean increase in egg selling prices. Totalprices and dozens sold.

Shell egg sales made up approximately 98% of shell eggs sold also decreasednet sales for the current thirteen-week period compared to the same period in fiscal 2016.thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017.  Dozens sold for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal year 20172018 were 263.6249.4 million, a decrease of 14.02.9% increase from 242.3 million or 5.0%, compared to 277.6 milliondozen for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2016 resulting in2017. The volume increase accounted for a decrease$6.8 million increase in net sales of $15.8 million.sales. 

Net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.017 for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, was $1.130, compared to $1.568$0.952 for the thirteen weeks ended FebruaryAugust 27, 2016,2016. The 6.8% increase in average selling price accounted for a decrease of 27.9%, resulting in a corresponding decrease$15.7 million increase in net shell egg sales of $121.6 million.sales.  Net average selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell eggs, including non-graded shell egg sales, breaking stock, and undergrades.    

Egg products and other revenues decreased $5.9accounted for 2% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017. These revenues were $6.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared to the same period of last year.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, approximately 98% of net sales were shell eggs and approximately 2% were egg products. Net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 were $799.9 million a decrease of $805.7 million, or 50.2%, compared to $1,605.6$5.6 million for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended FebruaryAugust 27, 2016, primarily due to the decrease in egg selling prices. Total dozens of shell eggs sold also decreased for the current thirty-nine week period compared to the same period in fiscal 2016. Dozens sold for the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 25, 2017 were 758.1 million, a decrease of 42.4 million, or 5.3%, compared to 800.5 million for the same period of fiscal 2016 resulting in a decrease in net sales of $43.3 million.

For the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 25, 2017, our net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.020 compared to $1.919 for the same period of fiscal 2016, a decrease of 46.8%, resulting in a corresponding decrease in net shell egg sales of $719.7 million.

Egg products and other revenues decreased $43.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 25, 2017 compared to the same period of fiscal 2016.

The table below represents an analysis of our non-specialty and specialty shell egg sales (in thousands, except percentage data).  Following the table is a discussion of the information presented in the table.

 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Total net sales $306,540
   $449,760
   $799,929
   $1,605,630
   $262,845
   $239,845
  
                        
Non-specialty shell egg $166,893
 55.6% $286,725
 65.6% $403,404
 51.6% $1,079,495
 69.9% $146,048
 56.9% $113,504
 48.4%
Specialty shell egg 122,337
 40.8% 135,654
 31.0% 344,873
 44.1% 416,398
 27.0% 101,697
 39.6% 109,312
 46.7%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 8,522
 2.8% 12,017
 2.7% 25,492
 3.3% 40,262
 2.6% 6,080
 2.4% 8,455
 3.6%
Other 2,346
 0.8% 2,987
 0.7% 7,828
 1.0% 7,288
 0.5% 2,884
 1.1% 2,997
 1.3%
Net shell egg sales $300,098
 100.0% $437,383
 100.0% $781,597
 100.0% $1,543,443
 100.0% $256,709
 100.0% $234,268
 100.0%
                        
Net shell egg sales as a percent of total net sales 98%   97%   98%   96%   98%   98%  
                        
Dozens sold:                        
Non-specialty shell egg 196,998
 74.7% 206,670
 74.4% 571,111
 75.3% 601,208
 75.1% 192,168
 77.0% 182,730
 75.4%
Specialty shell egg 62,265
 23.6% 65,443
 23.6% 174,204
 23.0% 182,747
 22.8% 54,138
 21.7% 55,399
 22.9%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 4,350
 1.7% 5,461
 2.0% 12,799
 1.7% 16,565
 2.1% 3,158
 1.3% 4,196
 1.7%
Total dozens sold 263,613
 100.0% 277,574
 100.0% 758,114
 100% 800,520
 100.0% 249,464
 100.0% 242,325
 100.0%
                        
Net average selling price $1.130
   $1.568
   $1.020
  
$1.919
  
Net average selling price per dozen:        
Non-specialty shell eggs $0.760
   $0.621
  
Specialty shell eggs $1.878
   $1.973
  
All shell eggs $1.017
   $0.952
  

Non-specialty shell eggs include all shell egg sales not specifically identified as specialty or co-pack specialty shell egg sales.   The non-specialty shell eggThis market is characterized generally by an inelasticity of demand. Small increases or decreases in production or demand can have a large positive or adverse effect on selling prices.  For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold decreasedincreased approximately 4.7%5.2%, and the average selling price decreased 38.7%increased 22.4% to $0.859$0.760 from $1.402 for the same period of the prior year. For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold decreased approximately 5.0%, and the average selling price decreased 60.2% to $0.720 from $1.808$0.621 for the same period of fiscal 2016.2017.


Specialty shell eggs, which include nutritionally enhanced, cage-free, organic, and brown eggs continue to make up a large portion of our total shell egg revenue and dozens sold.  Specialty egg retail prices are less cyclical than non-specialty shell egg prices and are generally higher due to consumer willingness to pay for the perceived benefits from these products.  This was particularly evident in recent quarters prior to our first quarter of fiscal 2018 as non-specialty egg prices declined more than specialty egg prices.  However, as non-specialty egg prices declined, we experienced some margin and volume pressures on specialty egg sales.  For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, specialty shell egg dozens sold decreased approximately 4.9%2.3%, and the average selling price decreased 5.2%4.8% to $1.965$1.878 from $2.073 for the same period of the prior year. For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, specialty shell egg dozens sold decreased 4.7%, and the average selling price decreased 13.1% to $1.980 from $2.279$1.973 for the same period of fiscal 2016.2017.

Co-pack specialty shell eggs are sold primarily through co-pack arrangements, a common practice in the industry whereby production and processing of certain products is outsourced to another producer.  Shell egg sales in this category represented 4.4 million1.3% and 5.5 million1.7% dozen for the quarters ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016, respectively,  primarily reflecting the loss of a portion of a major customer’s co-pack business.2016.  Co-pack specialty shell eggs sold during the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 and FebruaryAugust 27, 2016, were 12.83.2 million and 16.64.2 million, respectively.

The shell egg sales classified as “Other” represent sales of hard cooked eggs, hatching eggs, and other miscellaneous products, which are included with our shell egg operations. 

Egg products are shell eggs that are broken and sold in liquid, frozen, or dried form.  Our egg products are sold through our consolidated subsidiaries American Egg Products, LLC (“AEP”) and Texas Egg Products, LLC (“TEP”). For the third quarter of fiscal thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, egg product sales were $6.4$6.1 million, a decreasean increase of $5.9$559,000, or 10.0%, compared to $5.6 million for the same period of 2017. Pounds sold for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017 were 15.5 million, an increase of 1.1 million, or 47.9%7.9%, compared to

$12.4 14.4 million for the same period of fiscal 2016. Pounds sold for the third quarter of fiscal year 2017 were 16.7 million pounds, an increase of 1.6 million pounds, or 10.5%, compared to 15.1 million pounds for the same quarter of fiscal 2016.  For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, egg product sales were $18.3 million, a decrease of $43.9 million, or 70.5%, compared to $62.2 million for the same period of 2016. Pounds sold for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 were 47.6 million, an increase of 3.7 million, or 8.3%, compared to 44.0 million for the same period of fiscal 2016. Selling prices for liquid and frozen egg products were down 72.5% for the year to date period of fiscal 2017 compared with the same period of last year.2017.

COST OF SALES

Cost of sales consists of costs directly related to production, processing and packing of shell eggs, purchases of shell eggs from outside producers, processing and packing of liquid and frozen egg products, and other non-egg costs.  Farm production costs are those costs incurred at the egg production facility, including feed, facility, hen amortization, and other related farm production costs.


The following table presents the key variables affecting cost of sales (in thousands, except cost per dozen data).
໿
໿
໿
໿
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 Percent Change February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 Percent Change September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 Percent Change
Cost of Sales:                  
Farm production $151,478
 $147,482
 2.7 % 438,929
 427,334
 2.7 % 144,289
 142,871
 1.0 %
Processing, packaging, and warehouse 53,038
 48,447
 9.5 % 147,329
 139,497
 5.6 % 51,111
 46,302
 10.4 %
Egg purchases and other (including change in inventory) 57,806
 111,848
 (48.3)% 165,833
 388,697
 (57.3)% 43,780
 55,593
 (21.2)%
Total shell eggs 262,322
 307,777
 (14.8)% 752,091
 955,528
 (21.3)% 239,180
 244,766
 (2.3)%
Egg products 4,959
 9,157
 (45.8)% 13,691
 42,111
 (67.5)% 6,044
 4,299
 40.6 %
Other 94
 100
 (6.0)% 603
 597
 1.0 % 285
 349
 (18.3)%
Total $267,375
 $317,034
 (15.7)% $766,385
 $998,236
 (23.2)% $245,509
 $249,414
 (1.6)%
                  
                  
Farm production cost (per dozen produced)                  
Feed $0.396
 $0.414
 (4.3)% $0.406
 $0.420
 (3.3)% $0.375
 $0.431
 (13.0)%
Other 0.290
 0.281
 3.2 % $0.293
 $0.275
 6.5 % $0.306
 $0.294
 4.1 %
Total $0.686
 $0.695
 (1.3)% $0.699
 $0.695
 0.6 % $0.681
 $0.725
 (6.1)%
                  
Egg purchases (average cost per dozen) $1.10
 $1.51
 (27.2)% $1.04
 $1.90
 (45.3)%
Outside egg purchases (average cost per dozen) $0.98
 $1.03
 (4.9)%
                  
Dozen produced 222,492
 213,285
 4.3 % 633,246
 620,356
 2.1 % 213,570
 198,782
 7.4 %
Dozen sold 263,613
 277,574
 (5.0)% 758,114
 800,520
 (5.3)% 249,464
 242,325
 2.9 %

Cost of sales for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018 was $267.4$245.5 million, a decrease of $49.7$3.9 million, or 15.7%1.6%, compared to cost of sales of $317.0from $249.4 million for the same quarterperiod of fiscal 2016.2017. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in the volume and cost of egg purchases during the quarter, including eggs purchasedperiod. Dozens produced increased 7.4% resulting in higher farm production, processing, and packaging costs. These increases were offset by our egg products divisions.a lower feed cost per dozen produced. Feed cost per dozen for the fiscal 2017 third quarter was $0.396, compared to $0.414 per dozen for the comparable fiscal 2016 quarter, a decrease of 4.3% resulting in a decrease in cost of sales of $4.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared with the same period of fiscal 2016.  Other farm production cost increased 3.2% to $0.290 for the third quarter of 2017,was $0.375, compared to $0.281 for the same period of last year primarily due to increased layer hen amortization expense and facility costs related to capital improvement and conversion projects.


For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, total cost of sales was $766.4 million, a decrease of $231.9 million, or 23.2%, from $998.2 million for the same period of fiscal 2016. Similar to the thirteen week period, the decrease was driven by a decrease in the cost of egg purchases during the period, including eggs purchased by our egg products divisions. Feed cost per dozen for thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, was $0.406, compared to $0.420$0.431 per dozen for the comparable period of fiscal 2016,2017, a decrease of 3.3%13.0%, resulting in a decrease in cost of sales of $8.9$12.0 million for the comparable periods.period. Other farm production cost increased 6.5%4.1% to $0.293$0.306 for the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared to $0.275$0.294 for the same period of last year primarily due to increased layer hen amortization expense and facility costs related to capital improvement and conversion projects.

Gross margin decreased from 29.5% for the third quarter of fiscal 2016profit increased to 12.8%$17.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared to a loss of $9.6 million  for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 primarily due to the decreasedincreased average customer selling prices and decreased sales volumes. For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, gross profit was 4.2% compared to 37.8% for the same period of fiscal 2016, primarily due to the decreased average customer selling prices.

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general, and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting, and corporate overhead.  The following table presents an analysis of our selling, general, and administrative expenses (in thousands). 
 13 Weeks Ended

 13 Weeks Ended Actual 
Less: Acquisitions*
 Net      
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 $ Change % Change September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $15,329
 $17,458
 $(2,129) (12.2)% $11,734
 $337
 $11,397
 $13,057
 $(1,660) (12.7)%
Delivery expense 13,875
 12,781
 1,094
 8.6 % 13,124
 1,016
 12,108
 12,560
 (452) (3.6)%
Payroll and overhead 6,783
 10,016
 (3,233) (32.3)% 9,496
 724
 8,772
 8,438
 334
 4.0 %
Stock compensation expense 823
 732
 91
 12.4 % 859
 
 859
 848
 11
 1.3 %
Other expenses 6,928
 5,968
 960
 16.1 % 6,497
 1,273
 5,224
 5,353
 (129) (2.4)%
Total $43,738
 $46,955
 $(3,217) (6.9)% $41,710
 $3,350
 $38,360
 $40,256
 $(1,896) (4.7)%
            
*Represents amounts in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 related to our fiscal 2017 acquisitions, Foodonics International, Inc, and Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc., which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017.

*Represents amounts in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 related to our fiscal 2017 acquisitions, Foodonics International, Inc, and Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc., which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017.



໿
For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, selling, general, and administrative expenseexpenses was $43.7$41.7 million, a decreasean increase of 6.9%$1.4 million, or 3.5%, compared to $47.0$40.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended FebruaryAugust 27, 2016. SpecialtyThe impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions, which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017, was a $3.4 million increase to SG&A in the first quarter of 2018.

Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, specialty egg expense decreased $2.1$1.7 million, or 12.7%, compared to the same period of last year, a decrease of 12.2%.year. Specialty egg expense typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which decreased 4.9%2.3% for the current quarterthirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017 compared to the same period of last year. Franchise fees,Advertising expense, which is a component of specialty egg expense, for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017 decreased 14.0%19.5% from the same period of fiscal 2017. Payroll and overhead increased $334,000, or 4.0%, compared to higher than normal amountsthe same period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to 2017 bonus accruals being adjusted to actual payments which were made in the first quarter of fiscal 2016. Payroll and overhead2018. Delivery expense decreased $3.2 million,$452,000 or 32.3%3.6%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to reduced bonus accrualsa decrease in the current period.  As a percentage of net sales, payroll and overhead was 2.2% for the third quarter of fiscal 2017 compared to 2.2% for the same period of last year. Delivery expense increased $1.1 million, or 8.6%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to an increase in delivery personnel and fuel costs.contract trucking cost.

 39 Weeks Ended
 February 25, 2017 February 27, 2016 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $42,158
 $47,527
 $(5,369) (11.3)%
Delivery expense 39,570
 37,684
 1,886
 5.0 %
Payroll and overhead 23,945
 29,698
 (5,753) (19.4)%
Stock compensation expense 2,480
 2,176
 304
 14.0 %
Other expenses 17,832
 18,271
 (439) (2.4)%
Total $125,985
 $135,356
 $(9,371) (6.9)%
LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF FIXED ASSETS

໿
For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 , selling, general, and administrative expenses was $126.0 million, a decrease of 6.9%, compared to $135.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 27, 2016. Specialty egg expense decreased $5.4 million compared to the same period of last year, a decrease of 11.3%. Specialty egg expense

typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which decreased 4.7% for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 compared the same period of last year. Franchise fee, which is a component of specialty egg expense decreased 12.4% compared to higher than normal amounts in fiscal 2016. Payroll and overhead decreased $5.8 million, or 19.4%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to reduced bonus accruals in the current period and reduced expense related to the vesting of liability awards incurred inIn the first quarter of fiscal 2016. As2017 we recorded a percentage$525,000 loss on disposal of net sales, payroll and overhead was 3.0% for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 compared to 1.8% for the same period of last year. Delivery expense increased $1.9 million, or 5.0%, compared to the same period of last year primarilyfixed assets due to an increase in delivery personnel and fuel costs.a roof replacement at one of our Texas locations.

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

As a result of the above, operating loss was $4.6$24.4 million for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2017,2018, compared to operating income of $85.8$50.4 million for the fiscal 2016 third2017 first quarter. 

For the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 25, 2017, operating loss was $92.4 million compared to operating income of $472.0 million for the same period of last year.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)    

Total other income (expense) consists of items not directly charged to, or related to, operations such as interest income and expense, royalty income, equity in income or loss of affiliates, and patronage income, among other items.  

Total other income for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017 was $8.7 million, a decrease of of $3.0 million, compared to $11.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 27, 2016.  As a percent of net sales, other income was 2.9% for the thirteen weeks ended February 25, 2017 and 2.6% for the same period of fiscal 2016.

For the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2017,2018, we recorded $587,000$504,000 of interest income compared with $1.4to $1.1 million for the same period of last year.   ThisThe decrease resulted from lower average invested balances partially offset by higher average interest rates earned on investments.balances. The Company recorded interest expense of $386,000$146,000 and $435,000,$387,000, of which $210,000$116,000 and $365,000$379,000 was capitalized, in the thirdfirst quarters of fiscal 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.  These changes resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt and increasing capitalizedcapitalizing less interest relateddue to a reduction in major expansion and renovation projects.


Equity in income (loss) of affiliates for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20172018 was $1.0 milliona loss of $353,000 compared to $1.5 millionincome of $191,000 for the same period of last year.  The decrease of $524,000$544,000 is primarily due to losses at our Red River joint venture.

Other, net for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, was a loss of $680,000$538,000 compared with income of $1.6 million$122,000 for the same period of last year, a decrease of $2.3 million,$660,000, primarily driven by a $1.8 million gain on the sale of propertyreduction in Albuquerque, New Mexico recognized in the prior year.

Total othermiscellaneous income for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, was $11.3 million, a decrease of $2.8 million, compared to $14.1 million for the same period of last year. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in equity income from affiliates and a decrease in other, net. These declines were partially offset by an increase in interest incomeuninsured losses in the current year. As a percentage of net sales, other income was 1.4% for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 compared to 0.9% for the same period of last year.

The Company recorded interest income of $2.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, compared to $3.0 million for the same period of last year. We recorded interest expense of $1.1 million and $1.8 million, of which $959,000 and $819,000 was capitalized in the year to date period of fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. These changes resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt and increasing capitalized interest related to major expansion and renovation projects.


Equity in income of affiliates for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, was $1.9 million, a decrease of $1.7 million, from $3.6 million for the same period of fiscal 2016. This decrease is primarily due to losses at our Red River joint venture.

Other, net for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, was a loss of $1.6 million compared to income of $404,000 for the same period of last year, a decrease of $2.0 million, primarily driven by a $1.8 million gain on the sale of property in Albuquerque, New Mexico recognized in the prior year.period.

INCOME TAXES

Pre-tax income,loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $4.2$24.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, compared to pre-tax incomeloss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $97.3$48.5 million for last year’s comparable period.  For the current thirteen-week period, an income tax benefit of $34,000$8.3 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 0.8%34.3%, compared to an income tax expensebenefit of $33.2$17.6 million, with an effective rate of 34.1%36.2%, for last year’s comparable period.  The effective rate decrease for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 was primarily related to provision to return adjustments on the fiscal 2016 tax return.

Forprojected carryback of net operating losses, as the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest was $81.1 million compared to netcarryback reduced prior year taxable income of $484.3 million. For the current thirty-nine week period we recognized income tax benefit of $31.3 million, with an effective tax rate of 38.6%, compared to income tax expense of $167.8 million, with an effective tax rate of 34.7% for the same period of last year.

Included in prior period income tax expense isand the benefit of domestic manufacturers deductions, a portion of which was therefore reversed in the domestic production activity deduction.current period.

At February 25,September 2, 2017, the Company had recorded an income tax receivable of $49.9$56.0 million, an increase of $38.1$3.3 million, compared to $11.8$52.7 million at May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017. This increase is due to income tax benefit recorded on net losses for the current fiscal year 2017, which exceeds the overpayment position the Company was in related to fiscal year 2016 income taxes at May 28, 2016.2018.

Our effective rate differs from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes and certain items included in income for financial reporting purposes that are not included in taxable income for income tax purposes, including tax exempt interest income, domestic production activity deduction, and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.

NET INCOME (LOSS)LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

For the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest was $8,000$184,000 compared to net income of $178,000$44,000 for the same period of fiscal 2016.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, net loss2017. This is attributable to noncontrolling interest was $9,000 compared to net income of $1.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2016, a decrease attributable to the reduction in net incomelosses from the Company's consolidated joint ventures.

NET INCOME (LOSS)LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.

Net incomeloss for the thirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017 was $4.1$16.0 million, or $0.09$0.33 per basic and diluted share, compared $64.2$30.9 million, or $1.33$0.64 per basic and diluted share for the same period last year.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017, net loss was $49.8 million, or $1.03 per basic and diluted share, compared to net income of $316.4 million, or $6.57 per basic and $6.54 per diluted share for the same period of last year.


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Our working capital at February 25,September 2, 2017 was $392.2$357.5 million, compared to $542.8$371.5 million at May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017. The calculation of working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities. Our current ratio was 5.246.67 at February 25,September 2, 2017, compared with 7.506.74 at May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017. The decrease was due primarily to net losses in recent periods, along with the use of cash for capital expenditures and acquisitions.expenditures. We have $3.7$4.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit, which are collateralized by cash for the benefit of certain insurance companies. Our long-term debt at February 25,September 2, 2017, including current maturities, amounted to $22.8$9.7 million, compared to $25.6$10.9 million at May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017. Refer to Note 9 of our May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our long-term debt.
  
For the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, $57.2$21.5 million in net cash was used in operating activities, a decrease of $389.9$24.0 million, compared to net cash provided byused in operations of $332.7$45.4 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2016.   Decreased2017.   Improved gross profit margins primarily resulting from lowerhigher sales volumes and egg selling prices contributed greatly to our decreaseincrease in cash flow from operations.


For the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended February 25,September 2, 2017, approximately $228.3$34.1 million was provided from the sale of short-term investments and $25.9we used $2.7 million was used to purchasefor purchases of short-term investments, compared to $221.9$92.8 million in sales and $352.3$9.0 million in purchases in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2016.  We used $68.6 million for the previously discussed acquisition of the assets of Foodonics.2017.  We invested an additional $17.7$1.2 million in our previously disclosed Red River Valley Egg Farm, LLC joint venture (“Red River”River JV”). compared to $5.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017.  Approximately $54.9$6.5 million was used to purchase property, plant and equipment, including construction projects discussed in detail below, compared to $55.1$23.9 million in the thirty-ninethirteen weeks ended FebruaryAugust 27, 2016.  We paid dividendsThis decrease represents the completion of $99.5 million in thirty-nine weeks ended February 27, 2016 and none in fiscal 2017.several major expansion projects over the past twelve months. As of February 25,September 2, 2017, cash increased approximately $2.9$1.4 million since May 28, 2016June 3, 2017 compared to an increase of $528,000$8.6 million during the same period of fiscal 2016.2017.

To accommodate the previously discussed increase in customers committing to cage-free eggs over time, we expect that future expansions at our farms will be with environments that are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be converted to cage-free, based on a timeline that meets our customer’s needs.  The following table represents material construction projects approved as of March 24,September 28, 2017 (in thousands):

໿
Project Location Projected Completion Projected Cost Spent as of
February 25, 2017
 Remaining Projected Cost Location Projected Completion Projected Cost Incurred as of September 2, 2017 Remaining Projected Cost
Cage-Free Layer Houses South Texas March 2017 $4,033
 $3,969
 $64
 Lake City, FL September 2017 $8,669
 $8,614
 $55
California Compliant/Cage Free Layer House Expansions Delta, UT April 2017 12,162
 11,671
 491
Refurbish Layer Houses Cage Free Shady Dale, GA May 2017 4,864
 4,118
 746
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer House with Pullets South Texas September 2017 11,641
 11,626
 15
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses Green Forest, AR May 2017 8,146
 7,156
 990
 Green Forest, AR October 2017 8,991
 8,753
 238
Cage-Free Layer Houses South Texas June 2017 4,063
 2,745
 1,318
 South Texas November 2017 4,063
 3,904
 159
Cage-Free Layer Houses Lake City, FL June 2017 9,287
 7,504
 1,783
Layer Complex Improvements Bethune, SC October 2017 1,029
 
 1,029
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer House with Pullets South Texas October 2017 13,237
 10,787
 2,450
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses with Pullets Guthrie, KY January 2018 13,252
 7,332
 5,920
 Guthrie, KY January 2018 13,252
 12,194
 1,058
     $70,073
 $55,282
 $14,791
     $46,616
 $45,091
 $1,525

In addition to these projects, the Company expects to continue to fund its 50% share of the previously discussed Red River JV.  As of March 24,September 28, 2017, we have contributed $51.8$55.6 million to the joint venture to fund our share of construction,

startup costs, and operating losses. We estimate we will make additional contributions of approximately $10$7 million to fund our share of the remaining construction costs.

Certain property,Property, plant, and equipment at certain of our locations is pledged as collateral on our notes payable and senior secured notes.  Unless otherwise approved by our lenders, we are required by provisions of our loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum levels of working capital (current ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth, plus 45% of cumulative net income since the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005); (2) limit dividends paid in any given quarter to not exceed an amount equal to one third of the previous quarter’s consolidated net income (allowed if no events of default); (3) maintain minimum total funded debt to total capitalization (not to exceed 55%); and (4) maintain various cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At February 25,September 2, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenant requirements of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in control, as defined in the applicable loan agreement. Our debt agreements require Fred R. Adams, Jr., our Founder and Chairman Emeritus, or his family, to maintain ownership of Company shares representing not less than 50% of the outstanding voting power of the Company.    

We believe our current cash balances, investments, borrowings, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our current and projected capital needs for at least the next twelve months.


IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09). The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services.  In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 until annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. TheTo date the Company’s assessments efforts include evaluation of certain revenue contracts with customers and the method of retrospective application, either full or modified.  We currently expect to utilize the full retrospective transition on date of adoption.  Based on the findings to date, the Company does notexpectASU 2014-09to have a material impacton the consolidatedresults of operations or financial statement presentation.position; however, the Company’s assessment is not complete.  The Company plans to complete its review and method of adoption in fiscal 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases.  The purpose of the standard is to improve transparency and comparability related to the accounting and reporting of leasing arrangements.  The guidance will require balance sheet recognition for assets and liabilities associated with rights and obligations created by leases with terms greater than twelve months.  ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early adoption is permitted.  TheBased on the findings to date, the Company does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on the consolidatedresults of operations or financial statement presentation.position; however, the Company's assessment is not complete.

In March 2016,January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,2017-04, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Compensation AccountingSimplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2016-09 requires that excess tax benefits are recorded on, which removes step 2 from the income statement as opposed to additional paid-in-capital,goodwill impairment test. As a result, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and treated asshould recognize an operating activity onimpairment charge for the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 also allows companies to make an accounting policy election to either estimateamount by which the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. ASU 2016-09carrying amount exceeds the reporting units' fair value. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periodsor interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 with early2019, our fiscal 2021. Early adoption permitted.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the third quarter of fiscalis permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017, and it didthe prospective transition method should be applied. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on theour consolidated financial statement presentation.statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES    

We suggest our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016,June 3, 2017, be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 28, 2016.

June 3, 2017.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017.


ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of February 25,September 2, 2017 at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended February 25,September 2, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II.OTHERII. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGPROCEEDINGS
           
Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periods ended November 26, 2016 and August 27, 2016, under Part II Item 1: Legal Proceedings, and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 28, 2016,June 3, 2017, under Part I, Item 3:  Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13:12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following:
Litigation

Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2017, under Part I, Item 3:  Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following: 

Egg Antitrust Litigation

Since September 25, 2008, the Company has been named as one of several defendants in numerous antitrust cases involving the United States shell egg industry.  In some of these cases, the named plaintiffs allege that they purchased eggs or egg products directly from a defendant and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claim to be similarly situated.  In other cases, the named plaintiffs allege that they purchased shell eggs and egg products directly from one or more of the defendants but sue only for their own alleged damages and not on behalf of a putative class.  In the remaining cases, the named plaintiffs are individuals or companies who allege that they purchased shell eggs indirectly from one or more of the defendants - that is, they purchased from retailers that had previously purchased from defendants or other parties - and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claim to be similarly situated.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all of the putative class actions (as well as certain other cases in which the Company was not a named defendant) for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania court has organized the putative class actions around two groups (direct purchasers and indirect purchasers) and has named interim lead counsel for the named plaintiffs in each group.


The Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action. The direct purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As previously reported, in November 2014, the Court approved the Company’s settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class and entered final judgment dismissing with prejudice the class members’ claims against the Company.

The Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action.Action.  The indirect purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  On April 20-21, 2015, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On September 18, 2015, the Court denied the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification of 21 separate classes seeking damages under the laws of 21 states, holding that the plaintiffs were not able to prove that their purported method for ascertaining class membership was reliable or administratively feasible, that common questions would predominate, or that their proposed class approach would be manageable in a single trial.  In addition to barring any right to pursue a class monetary remedy under state law, the Court also denied indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ request for certification of an injunctive-relief class under federal law. However, the court allowed the indirect purchaser plaintiffs to renew their motion for class certification seeking a federal injunction. The plaintiffs filed their renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class on October 23, 2015. The Company joined the other defendants in opposing that motion on November 20.  The plaintiffs filed their reply memorandum on December 11, 2015, and on March 7, 2017, the Court heard arguments on the renewed motion for injunctive class certification. TheOn June 27, 2017, the Court has not ruled on this motion.denied plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. The plaintiffs also filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, asking the court to hear an immediate appeal of the trial court’s denial of the motion to certify 21 state-law damages classes. On December 3, 2015, the Third Circuit entered an order staying its consideration of the plaintiffs’ request for an immediate appeal of the damages-class ruling pending the trial court’s resolution of the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class.


On July 2, 2015,11, 2017 the plaintiffs filed a petition with the Third Circuit asking the court to hear an immediate appeal of the June 27 order denying plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. On July 21, 2017, the Company joined other defendants in a response filed and joined several motions for summary judgment that soughtwith the Third Circuit opposing the plaintiffs' latest petition. The Third Circuit has not yet ruled on either dismissal of the entire case or, in the alternative, dismissal of portions of the case.  On July 2, 2015, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed motions for summary judgment seeking dismissal of certain affirmative defenses based on statutory immunities from federal and state antitrust laws. The Court heard oral argument on the motions for summary judgment on February 22 and 23, 2016. On September 9, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on liability, dismissing as a matter of law the plaintiffs’ allegations of a side agreement to cease construction of new facilities and ruling that the plaintiffs’ allegations against the United Egg Producers (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines must be evaluated at trial under the rule of reason. On September 13, 2016, the Court granted in part the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to the applicability of the Capper-Volstead defense, ruling that United States Egg Marketers (an industry cooperative of which the Company is a member) may invoke the defense at trial but that UEP (another industry cooperative of which the Company is a member) cannot. The Capper-Volstead defense is a defense pursuant to the Capper-Volstead Act (the Co-operative Marketing Associations Act), enacted by Congress in 1922, which gives certain associations of farmers certain exemptions from antitrust laws.petition.

The Non-Class Cases.Cases. Six of the cases in which plaintiffs do not seek to certify a class have been consolidated with the putative class actions into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court granted with prejudice the defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss the non-class plaintiffs’ claims for damages arising before September 24, 2004. On July 2, 2015, the Company filed and joined several motions for summary judgment that sought either dismissal of all of the claims in all of these cases or, in the alternative, dismissal of portions of these cases. On July 2, 2015, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of certain affirmative defenses based on statutory immunities from federal antitrust law. The Court heard oral argument on the motions for summary judgment on February 22 and 23, 2016. On September 6, 2016, the Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs’ claims arising from their purchases of egg products, dismissing those claims with prejudice. On September 9, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on liability, dismissing as a matter of law the plaintiffs’ allegations of a side agreement to cease construction of new facilities and ruling that the plaintiffs’ allegations against the UEPUnited Egg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines must be evaluated at trial under the rule of reason. On September 12, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on damages, ruling that plaintiffs cannot recover damages onarising from purchases of eggs from non-defendants and cannot recover any relief onarising from eggs and egg products produced or sold in Arizona after October 1, 2009, the date that Arizona mandated that all eggs sold or produced in that state must be produced in compliance with the 2008 version of the UEP animal-welfare guidelines. On September 13, 2016, the Court granted in part the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment as to the applicability of the Capper-Volstead defense, ruling that United States Egg Marketers (an industry cooperative of which the Company is a member) may invoke the defense at trial but that UEP (another industry cooperative of which the Company is a member) cannot. The Capper-Volstead defense is a defense pursuant to the Capper-Volstead Act (the Co-operative Marketing Associations Act), enacted by Congress in 1922, which gives certain associations of farmers certain exemptions from antitrust laws. On October 4, 2016, certain direct action plaintiffs (Kraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) filed an appeal to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from the District Court’s Order dated September 6, 2016, granting Defendants’defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice all claims based on the purchase of egg products. These plaintiffs filed their Opening Briefopening brief on March 7, 2017, and the defendants’2017. The defendants filed their response is duebrief on April 20, 2017.20. These plaintiffs filed their reply brief on May 18. The court of appeals heard oral argument on July 11, 2017, but has not issued a ruling. On November 22, 2016, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Court to hold a status conference and asking the court to set the non-class cases for trial in June of 2017. The parties in all of the remaining class and non-class cases submitted several different proposed trial schedules to the court, and a status conference was held on February 9, 2017. A trial dateOn August 11, 2017, the Company and certain other defendants filed a motion to exclude damage calculations by direct action plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Baye. The direct action plaintiffs filed a motion to strike on August 25, 2017, and then filed a memorandum in support thereof on August 28, 2017. On September 8, the Company and the other moving defendants filed a response to the plaintiffs’ motion to strike. The court has not yet been set.scheduled a hearing on these latest motions for October 25, 2017.

Allegations in Each Case.Case. In all of the cases described above, the plaintiffs allege that the Company and certain other large domestic egg producers conspired to reduce the domestic supply of eggs in a concerted effort to raise the price of eggs to artificially high levels. In each case, plaintiffs allege that all defendants agreed to reduce the domestic supply of eggs by: (a) agreeing to limit production; (b) manipulating egg exports; and (c) implementing industry-wide animal welfare guidelines that reduced the number of hens and eggs.

The named plaintiffs in the remaining indirect purchaser putative class action seek treble damages under the statutes and common-law of various states and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act on behalf of themselves and all other putative class members in the United States. Although plaintiffs allege a class period starting in October, 2006 and running “through the present,” the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify classes seeking damages under the

laws of 21 states and denied without prejudice the plaintiffs’ motion to certify an injunctive-relief class, although the plaintiffs have filed a renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class, as discussed above.

Five of the original six non-class cases remain pending against the Company. The principal plaintiffs in these cases are: The Kroger Co.; Publix Super Markets, Inc.; SUPERVALU, Inc.; Safeway, Inc.; Albertsons LLC; H.E. Butt Grocery Co.; The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Hy-Vee, Inc.; and Giant Eagle, Inc. In four of these remaining non-class cases, the plaintiffs seek treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act.  In one of those four cases, the plaintiffs purchased only egg products, and as noted above, the Court dismissed with prejudice all claims arising from the purchase of egg products. On October 4, 2016, the four plaintiffs in that case (Kraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In the fifth remaining non-class case, the plaintiff seeks treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act and the Ohio antitrust act (known as the Valentine Act).

The Pennsylvania court has entered a series of orders related to case management, discovery, class certification, summary judgment, and scheduling.  The Court has also denied all four motions that the plaintiffs filed to exclude testimony from certain expert witnesses retained by the defendants. The Pennsylvania court has notcourt’s latest Case Management Order (No. 23) was filed on September 20, 2017, and indicated that the non-class plaintiffs’ cases would be set afor trial date for any of the Company’s remaining consolidated cases (non-class and indirect purchaser cases). As noted above, the court held a hearing on the parties’ proposed trial schedules but has not yet set a trial date.later in calendar year 2018.

The Company intends to continue to defend the remaining cases as vigorously as possible based on defenses which the Company believes are meritorious and provable.  While management believes that the likelihood of a material adverse outcome in the overall egg antitrust litigation has been significantly reduced as a result of the settlements and rulings described above, there is still a reasonable possibility of a material adverse outcome in the remaining egg antitrust litigation. At the present time, however, it is not possible to estimate the amount of monetary exposure, if any, to the Company because of these cases. Accordingly, adjustments, if any, which might result from the resolution of these remaining legal matters, have not been reflected in the financial statements.

Other Matters

In addition to the above, the Company is involved in various other claims and litigation incidental to its business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined with certainty, management, upon the advice of counsel,

is of the opinion that the final outcome should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

At this time, it is not possible for us to predict the ultimate outcome of the matters set forth above.
 
 
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
                     
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on  Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2016.June 3, 2017.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table is a summary of our thirdfirst quarter 20172018 share repurchases:
      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
11/27/16 to 12/24/16 
 $
 
 
12/25/16 to 01/21/17 38,160
 43.00
 
 
01/22/17 to 02/25/17 327
 41.15
 
 
  38,487
 $42.98
 
 

      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
06/04/17 to 07/01/17 519
 $39.60
 
 
07/02/17 to 07/29/17 
 
 
 
07/30/17 to 09/02/17 
 
 
 
  519
 $39.60
 
 

(1) As permitted under our 2012 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan, these shares were withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations for employees in connection with the vesting of common stock.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits
Exhibits


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Registrant)

Date: March 27,October 2, 2017/s/ Timothy A. Dawson
 Timothy A. Dawson
 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
໿
Date: March 27,October 2, 2017/s/ Michael D. Castleberry
 Michael D. Castleberry
 
Vice President, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
໿


3025