Index

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q
(mark one)

þ     Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017

OR

¨     Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number:  000-04892

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 64-0500378
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

3320 Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi  39209
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(601) 948-6813
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ      No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    
Large Accelerated filer þ
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
   
Non – Accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
  
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨    No þ
There were 43,772,42843,774,928 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, and 4,800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of SeptemberDecember 29, 2017.


Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBERDECEMBER 2, 2017
     Page Number
Part I.    
      
 Item 1.   
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 3.  
      
 Item 4.  
      
Part II.    
      
 Item 1.  
      
 Item 1A.  
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 6.  
      
    



Index

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
 (unaudited)   December 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
ASSETS     
 (unaudited)
  
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $18,943
 $17,564
 $19,808
 $17,564
Investment securities available-for-sale 107,028
 138,462
 189,492
 138,462
Trade and other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of  
  
  
  
$435 and $386 at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively) 75,626
 64,509
$916 and $386 at December 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively) 111,290
 64,509
Income tax receivable 55,970
 52,691
 
 52,691
Inventories 159,226
 160,692
 163,041
 160,692
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,753
 2,288
 2,556
 2,288
Total current assets 420,546
 436,206
 486,187
 436,206
Property, plant and equipment, net 452,099
 458,184
 443,093
 458,184
Other investments 69,435
 69,296
 68,821
 69,296
Goodwill 35,525
 35,525
 35,525
 35,525
Other intangible assets, net 28,590
 29,149
 27,726
 29,149
Other assets 4,833
 4,734
 4,779
 4,734
TOTAL ASSETS $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
 $1,066,131
 $1,033,094
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $58,386
 $59,853
 $89,883
 $59,853
Current maturities of long-term debt 4,683
 4,826
Accrued legal settlement expense - see Notes 4 and 10 80,750
 
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 4,316
 4,826
Total current liabilities 63,069
 64,679
 174,949
 64,679
Long-term debt, less current maturities 5,048
 6,113
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current maturities 4,204
 6,113
Other noncurrent liabilities 7,565
 7,527
 7,689
 7,527
Deferred income taxes 105,881
 110,282
 75,335
 110,282
Total liabilities 181,563
 188,601
 262,177
 188,601
  
  
  
  
Commitments and Contingencies - see Note 4 

 

 

 

        
Stockholders’ equity:  
  
  
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 120,000 and 70,261 shares authorized and issued  
  
  
  
at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively, and 43,773 and 43,777  
  
shares outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively 703
 703
at December 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively, and 43,775 and 43,777  
  
shares outstanding at December 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively 703
 703
Class A convertible common stock, $.01 par value, 4,800 shares authorized, issued  
  
  
  
and outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively  48
 48
and outstanding at December 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively  48
 48
Paid-in capital 50,792
 49,932
 51,670
 49,932
Retained earnings 800,053
 816,046
 773,917
 816,046
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (96) (128) (400) (128)
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,488 and 26,484 shares at September 3, 2017  
  
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,486 and 26,484 shares at December 2, 2017  
  
and June 3, 2017, respectively (23,936) (23,914) (23,940) (23,914)
Total Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. stockholders’ equity 827,564
 842,687
 801,998
 842,687
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities 1,901
 1,806
 1,956
 1,806
Total stockholders’ equity 829,465
 844,493
 803,954
 844,493
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
 $1,066,131
 $1,033,094
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Net sales $262,845
 $239,845
 $361,172
 $253,544
 $624,017
 $493,389
Cost of sales 245,509
 249,414
 278,776
 249,596
 524,285
 499,010
Gross profit (loss) 17,336
 (9,569) 82,396
 3,948
 99,732
 (5,621)
Selling, general, and administrative expense 41,710
 40,256
 42,160
 41,991
 83,870
 82,247
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 4
 525
Legal settlement expense - see Notes 4 and 10 80,750
 
 80,750
 
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets (50) 215
 (46) 740
Operating loss (24,378) (50,350) (40,464) (38,258) (64,842) (88,608)
Other income (expense):  
  
      
  
Interest income, net 474
 1,091
 578
 781
 1,052
 1,872
Royalty income 278
 406
 312
 324
 590
 730
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (353) 191
 276
 645
 (77) 836
Other, net (538) 122
 (795) (260) (1,333) (138)
Total other income (loss) (139) 1,810
Total other income 371
 1,490
 232
 3,300
            
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (24,517) (48,540) (40,093) (36,768) (64,610) (85,308)
Income tax benefit 8,340
 17,560
 (14,012) (13,801) (22,352) (31,361)
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (16,177) (30,980) (26,081) (22,967) (42,258) (53,947)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 55
 43
 (129) (1)
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936) $(26,136) $(23,010) $(42,129) $(53,946)
            
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
      
  
Basic $(0.33) $(0.64) $(0.54) $(0.48) $(0.87) $(1.12)
Diluted $(0.33) $(0.64) $(0.54) $(0.48) $(0.87) $(1.12)
Weighted average shares outstanding:  
  
      
  
Basic 48,330
 48,249
 48,330
 48,250
 48,330
 48,249
Diluted 48,330
 48,249
 48,330
 48,250
 48,330
 48,249

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME(LOSS)LOSS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net loss, including noncontrolling interests $(16,177) $(30,980)
   
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:  
  
   
  
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments 51
 502
   
  
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (19) (191)
   
  
Other comprehensive gain, net of  tax 32
 311
   
  
Comprehensive loss (16,145) (30,669)
   
  
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
   
  
Comprehensive loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,961) $(30,625)
  13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
  December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Net loss, including noncontrolling interests $(26,081) $(22,967) $(42,258) $(53,947)
       
  
Other comprehensive loss, before tax:      
  
       
  
Unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments (508) (536) (457) (34)
       
  
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive loss 204
 204
 185
 13
       
  
Other comprehensive loss, net of  tax (304) (332) (272) (21)
       
  
Comprehensive loss (26,385) (23,299) (42,530) (53,968)
       
  
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest 55
 43
 (129) (1)
       
  
Comprehensive loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(26,440) $(23,342) $(42,401) $(53,967)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Operating activities:        
Net loss including noncontrolling interest $(16,177) $(30,980) $(42,258) $(53,947)
Depreciation and amortization 13,137
 11,159
 26,612
 22,975
Other adjustments, net (18,447) (25,626) 80,488
 (39,217)
Net cash used in operations (21,487) (45,447)
Net cash provided by (used in) operations 64,842
 (70,189)
  
  
  
  
Investing activities:  
  
  
  
Purchase of investments (2,653) (9,008) (112,804) (13,324)
Sales of investments 34,104
 92,833
 61,737
 193,280
Investment in joint ventures (1,200) (5,500)
Acquisition of business 
 (68,643)
Investment in joint venture (2,800) (10,750)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (6,517) (23,895) (10,171) (40,649)
Payments received on notes receivable and from affiliates 8
 1,250
 3,385
 1,750
Net proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 74
 10
 220
 163
Net cash provided by investing activities 23,816
 55,690
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (60,433) 61,827
  
  
  
  
Financing activities:   
  
  
  
Purchase of common stock by treasury (21) (40) (25) (60)
Contributions from (distributions to) noncontrolling interests 279
 (73) 279
 (73)
Principal payments on long-term debt (1,208) (1,530)
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations (2,419) (3,060)
Net cash used in financing activities (950) (1,643) (2,165) (3,193)
    
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 1,379
 8,600
 2,244
 (11,555)
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 17,564
 29,046
 17,564
 29,046
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $18,943
 $37,646
 $19,808
 $17,491

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
SeptemberDecember 2, 2017
(unaudited)
1.   Presentation of Interim Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affected reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.  Operating results for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 2, 2018.  

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 3, 2017 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.  It does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.��

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

2.   Stock Based Compensation

Total stock based compensation expense for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016 was $859,000$1.7 million and $848,000,$1.7 million, respectively. 

Unrecognized compensation expense as a result of non-vested shares of the 2012 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 was $4.9$4.1 million and will be recorded over a weighted average period of 1.91.7 years.  Refer to Note 10 of our June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our stock compensation plans.

At SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, there were 243,150244,640 restricted shares outstanding, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $42.76$42.71 per share. The Company’s restricted share activity for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 follows:
 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding, June 3, 2017 247,735
 $42.76
 247,735
 $42.76
Granted 
 
 2,500
 37.40
Vested (1,750) 42.10
 (2,110) 42.01
Forfeited (2,835) 42.94
 (3,485) 43.00
Outstanding, September 2, 2017 243,150
 $42.76
Outstanding, December 2, 2017 244,640
 $42.71

Index

3.   Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Index

 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017 December 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
Flocks $97,108
 $98,059
 $93,835
 $98,059
Eggs and egg products 14,697
 14,911
 18,604
 14,911
Feed and supplies 47,421
 47,722
 50,602
 47,722
 $159,226
 $160,692
 $163,041
 $160,692

We grow and maintain flocks of layers (mature female chickens), pullets (female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), and breeders (male and female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks). Our total flock at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, consisted of approximately 9.19.2 million pullets and breeders and 36.738.1 million layers.

4.   Contingencies

Financial Instruments
The Company maintained standby letters of credit (“LOC”) totaling $4.2 million at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017.  The LOCs are collateralized with cash which is included in the line item “Other assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.    The outstanding LOCs are for the benefit of certain insurance companies, and are not recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets.

Legal Contingencies
The Company is a defendant in certain legal actions, and intends to vigorously defend its position in these actions.  If the Company’s assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, the estimated liability is accrued in the Company’s financial statements.    If the assessment indicates a potential material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or probable but cannot be reasonably estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss will be disclosed, or a statement will be made that such an estimate cannot be made.

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will settle the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $52.8 million net of tax, or $1.09 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2018.

These legal actions are discussed in detail at Part II, Item 1, of this report.

Index

5.   Net Loss per Common Share  

Basic net loss per share was calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net loss per share was calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of options and restricted stock.  Due to the net loss in the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016, restricted shares in the amount of 112,353 and 140,551, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.  The computations of basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to the Company are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936) $(26,136) $(23,010) $(42,129) $(53,946)
  
  
      
  
Basic weighted-average common shares 48,330
 48,249
 48,330
 48,250
 48,330
 48,249
Effect of dilutive securities:  
  
Restricted shares 
 
Dilutive potential common shares 48,330
 48,249
 48,330
 48,250
 48,330
 48,249
        
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share

 138
 155
 127
 148
  
  
      
  
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
      
  
Basic $(0.33) $(0.64) $(0.54) $(0.48) $(0.87) $(1.12)
Diluted $(0.33) $(0.64) $(0.54) $(0.48) $(0.87) $(1.12)

6.   Accrued Dividends Payable and Dividends per Common Share

We make an accrual of dividends payable at the end of each quarter according to the Company’s dividend policy adopted by its Board of Directors. The Company pays a dividend to shareholders of its Common Stock and Class A Common Stock on a quarterly basis for each quarter for which the Company reports net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of such quarterly income. Dividends are paid to shareholders of record as of the 60th day following the last day of such quarter, except for the fourth fiscal quarter.  For the fourth quarter, the Company pays dividends to shareholders of record on the 65th day after the quarter end. Dividends are payable on the 15th day following the record date. Following a quarter for which the Company does not report net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., the Company will not pay a dividend for a subsequent profitable quarter until the Company is profitable on a cumulative basis computed from the date of the last quarter for which a dividend was paid. Therefore, the Company did not pay a dividend with respect to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, or any quarter of fiscal 2017, and will not pay a dividend for the first quarteror second quarters of fiscal 2018. At SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, the cumulative losses that must be recovered prior to paying a dividend were $90.6$116.8 million. When applicable, the amount of the accrual appears on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Accrued dividends payable.”

7.   Fair Value Measurements

The Company is required to categorize both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy.  The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable, and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
Index

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

The disclosures of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at cost are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt: The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is at its stated value.  We have not elected to carry our long-term debt at fair value.  Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, which are level 2 inputs. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s borrowings under its long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):
 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017 December 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
5.4% – 6.2% Notes payable $8,125
 $8,161
 $9,250
 $9,295
 $7,000
 $7,006
 $9,250
 $9,295
Long-term leases 1,606
 1,445
 1,689
 1,520
 1,520
 1,355
 1,689
 1,520
 $9,731
 $9,606
 $10,939
 $10,815
 $8,520
 $8,361
 $10,939
 $10,815

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
໿
       Total       Total
September 2, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
December 2, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations 
 $20,872
 
 $20,872
 
 $20,787
 
 $20,787
Municipal bonds 
 29,100
 
 29,100
 
 24,376
 
 24,376
Commercial paper 
 3,493
 
 3,493
Corporate bonds 
 53,976
 
 53,976
 
 138,807
 
 138,807
Asset backed securities 
 3,080
 
 3,080
 
 2,029
 
 2,029
Mutual funds 2,509
 
 
 2,509
 2,647
 
 
 2,647
Total assets measured at fair value $2,509
 $107,028
 
 $109,537
 $2,647
 $189,492
 
 $192,139
໿
        Total
June 3, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations $
 $20,216
 $
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 
 36,873
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 
 75,790
 
 75,790
Asset backed securities 
 5,583
 
 5,583
Mutual funds 2,459
 
 
 2,459
Total assets measured at fair value $2,459
 $138,462
 $
 $140,921

Investment securities – available-for-sale, classified as level 2, consist of U.S. government and agency obligations, taxable and tax exempt municipal bonds, zero coupon municipal bonds, foreign government obligations, asset backed securities and corporate bonds with maturities of three months or longer when purchased. We classify these securities as current, because amounts invested are available for current operations. Observable inputs for these securities are yields, credit risks, default rates, and volatility.

໿
໿
Index

8.   Investment Securities

The following represents the Company’s investment securities as of SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
Index

September 2, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
December 2, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $20,906
 $
 $34
 $20,872
 $20,907
 $
 $120
 $20,787
Municipal bonds 29,069
 31
 
 29,100
 24,412
 
 36
 24,376
Corporate bonds 53,948
 28
 
 53,976
 139,274
 
 467
 138,807
Commercial paper 3,494
 
 1
 3,493
Asset backed securities 3,081
 
 1
 3,080
 2,033
 
 4
 2,029
Total current investment securities $107,004
 $59
 $35
 $107,028
 $190,120
 $
 $628
 $189,492
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
 $1,711
 $936
 $
 $2,647
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
 $1,711
 $936
 $
 $2,647
June 3, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $20,259
 $
 $43
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 36,839
 34
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 75,769
 21
 
 75,790
Asset backed securities 5,583
 
 
 5,583
Total current investment securities $138,450
 $55
 $43
 $138,462
   
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities were $34.1$61.7 million and $92.8$193.3 million during the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016, respectively. Gross realized gains during the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016 were $16,000$22,000 and $231,000,$221,000, respectively.  Gross realized losses during the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016 were zero and $6,000, respectively. For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Unrealized holding gains and (losses), net of taxes, for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Current investments $8
 $271
 $(420) $(78)
Noncurrent investments 24
 40
 148
 57
Total unrealized holding gains $32
 $311
 $(272) $(21)

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.  Contractual maturities at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, are as follows (in thousands):
 Estimated Fair Value Estimated Fair Value
Within one year  $73,204
 $99,175
1-5 years 33,824
 90,317
Total $107,028
 $189,492

໿
Index

9.   Equity

The following reflects the equity activity, including our noncontrolling interest, for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 (in thousands)thousands, except share amounts):
໿
 Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders     Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders    
 Common Stock         Common Stock        
  
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling    
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling  
 Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Income Earnings Interest Total Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Loss Earnings Interest Total
Balance at June 3, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,914) $49,932
 $(128) $816,046
 $1,806
 $844,493
 $703
 $48
 $(23,914) $49,932
 $(128) $816,046
 $1,806
 $844,493
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 
 
 
 
 32
 
 
 32
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 
 
 
 
 (272) 
 
 (272)
Grant of restricted stock 
 
 2
 (2) 
 
 
 
Forfeiture of restricted stock 
 
 (1) 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (3) 3
 
 
 
 
Buyback of 519 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (21) 
 
 
 
 (21)
Buyback of 638 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (25) 
 
 
 
 (25)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest partners 
 
 
 
 
 
 279
 279
 
 
 
 
 
 
 279
 279
Restricted stock compensation 
 
 
 859
 
 
 
 859
 
 
 
 1,737
 
 
 
 1,737
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (15,993) (184) (16,177) 
 
 
 
 
 (42,129) (129) (42,258)
Balance at September 2, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,936) $50,792
 $(96) $800,053
 $1,901
 $829,465
Balance at December 2, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,940) $51,670
 $(400) $773,917
 $1,956
 $803,954

10. Subsequent Event

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company (See Note 4). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will settle the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $52.8 million net of tax, or $1.09 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company has recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) relating to our shell egg business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules, projected construction costs, and other operating data, including anticipated results of operations and financial condition.  Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plans,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” or similar words.  Actual production, operating schedules, capital costs, results of operations, and other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements are based on management’s current intent, belief, expectations, estimates, and projections regarding the Company and its industry.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control.  The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, among others, (i) the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017,, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the shell egg business (including disease, pests, weather conditions, and potential for product recall), (iii) changes in the demand for and market prices of shell eggs and feed costs, (iv) our ability to predict and meet demand for cage-free and other specialty eggs, (v) risks, changes, or obligations that could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses and risks or changes that may cause conditions to completing a pending acquisition not to be met, and (vi) adverse results in pending litigation matters.  In addition, we continue to assess the impact of the recently enacted federal tax reform legislation on our business and consolidated financial statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because, while we believe the assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these
Index

forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate.  Further, forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the respective dates thereof, or if no date is stated, as of the date hereof.  Except as otherwise required by law, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise.

OVERVIEW

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the production, grading, packaging, marketing, and distribution of fresh shell eggs.  Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
 
Index

Our operations are fully integrated.  At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male and female birds used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks), manufacture feed, and produce, process, and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in the United States ("U.S.").  We market the majority of our shell eggs in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western, and mid-Atlantic regions of the U.S.  We market shell eggs through an extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice distributors, and egg product consumers.    

The Company has one operating segment, which is the production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of shell eggs.  The majority of our customers rely on us to provide most of their shell egg needs, including specialty and non-specialty eggs. Specialty eggs represent a broad range of products.  We classify nutritionally enhanced, cage free, organic and brown eggs as specialty products for accounting and reporting purposes. We classify all other shell eggs as non-specialty products.  While we report separate sales information for these types of eggs, there are a number of cost factors which are not specifically available for non-specialty or specialty eggs due to the nature of egg production. We manage our operations and allocate resources to these types of eggs on a consolidated basis based on the demands of our customers.
 
Our operating results are directly tied to egg prices, which are highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, and are outside of our control. For example, the annual per dozen eggs average of the Urner-Barry Southeastern Regional Large Egg Market Price per dozen eggs,("UB southeastern large index"), for our last ten fiscal years 2005-2017 ranged from a low of $0.72$0.85 in fiscal year 20052017 to a high of $2.97$1.79 in fiscal year 2016.  The shell egg industry has traditionally been subject to periods of high profitability followed by periods of significant loss. In the past, during periods of high profitability, shell egg producers tended to increase the number of layers in production with a resulting increase in the supply of shell eggs, which generally caused a drop in shell egg prices until supply and demand returned to balance.  As a result, our financial results from year to year may vary significantly.   Shorter term, retail sales of shell eggs historically have been greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months.  Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal factors and a natural increase in shell egg production in the spring and early summer.  Shell egg prices tend to increase with the start of the school year and are highest prior to holiday periods, particularly Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter.  Consequently, we generally experience lower sales and net income in our first and fourth fiscal quarters ending in August and May, respectively. Because of the seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, comparisons of our sales and operating results between different quarters within a single fiscal year are not necessarily meaningful comparisons.  

In 2015, our industry experienced a significant avian influenza (“AI”) outbreak, primarily in the upper Midwestern U.S.  There were no positive tests for AI at any of our locations. Based on several published industry estimates, we believe approximately 12% of the national flock of laying hens was affected.  During April through June 2015, the affected laying hens were either destroyed by the disease or euthanized.  The USDA data showed the supply of laying hens decreased substantially. Since that time, hen numbers began to recoverhave recovered and eventually exceed pre-AIeven exceeded pre–AI levels byin late 2016. In February 2017, the USDA issued revised data that showed the size of the laying hen flock for calendar years 2015 and 2016 was meaningfully higher in both years than previously reported.

Egg prices increased significantly during the summer and fall of 2015. The average Urner-Barryof Thursday priceprices for the UB southeastern large market (i.e. conventional shell eggs) in the southeastern regionindex for the months of June through November 2015 was $2.32 per dozen, with a peak of $2.97 in August.  Subsequent to November 2015, shell egg prices declined.  The Urner Barry priceUB southeastern large index ("UB index") hit a decade-low level in both our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter and fiscal 2017 second quarter. During our fiscal 2018 first quarter,the twenty-six weeks ended
Index

December 2, 2017, the UB southeastern large index averaged $0.94$1.19 per dozen, a 25.3%53.8% increase over the comparable period of the prior year period average of $0.75which averaged $0.77 per dozen. In spite of this increase, the UB southeastern large index remained below historical levels. Subsequent to the endaverage of our$1.46 for fiscal 2018 first quarter it has continued to increase.2012-2016.

According to Nielsen data, retail customer demand for shell eggscalendar year 2017 has remained strong.been very good and in line with normal seasonal trends, supported by increased egg promotions in grocery stores. After a period of sluggish demand from institutional food customers, this sector has seen increasing egg usage in recent months. The USDA reports that shell egg exportexports have continued to expand in calendar 2017 and have recovered from previous low levels following the 2015 avian influenza (AI) outbreak. Export demand has improved sincealso increased as a result of the beginning of fiscal 2017; however, it has not fully recovered to levels prior to the AI outbreak. Additionally, the industry experienced reducedreported Fipronil contaminations across Europe and Southeast Asia. Together, these demand for egg products, as many commercial customers reformulated their products to use fewer eggs when prices spiked andtrends have been slow to resume previous egg usage. Togetherresulted in a more favorable market environment compared with the increased supply of hens, these factors created an oversupply of eggs, with pressure on
Index

market prices. Recently, increasing exports have returned to historical levels, although they remain below the peaks seen just prior to the AI outbreak, and USDA reports show the chick hatch has been trending down, suggesting there may be a moderation in the size of theyear ago. The laying hen flock over time.size has been consistent with prior-year levels as production has moderated, resulting in an improved balance of supply and demand. Accordingly, our net average selling price for shell eggs for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2018 was $1.017$1.321 compared with $0.952$0.971 for the corresponding period of fiscal 2017. While overall market conditions are more favorable than a year ago, we do not expect any sustained improvementRecent USDA reports, however, show an increase in pricing until we have a more stable supply and demand balance.chicks hatched which could indicate future increases in supply.

We are one of the largest producers and marketers of value-added specialty shell eggs in the U.S. They have been a significant and growing portion of the market in recent years. During our fiscal 2016 a number of large restaurant chains, food service companies and grocery chains, including our largest customers, announced goals to transition to a cage-free egg supply chain by specified future dates. We are working with our customers to achieve smooth progress in meeting their goals. Our focus for future expansion at our farms will be environments that are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be converted to cage-free, based on a timeline to meet our customer’s needs.

For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, we produced approximately 86%85% of the total number of shell eggs we sold compared to 82%84% in the comparable prior year period.  We produced 7.4%5.2% more dozens during the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 than in the corresponding period of last year. For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, approximately 9% of such production was provided by contract producers who utilize their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned by us compared to 5%7% for the same period of last year. This increase represents contract production acquired with our fiscal 2017 acquisitions. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements.

Our cost of production is materially affected by feed costs.  Feed costs averaged approximately 55%57% of our total farm egg production cost for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 compared to 60% for the same period of fiscal 2017.and November 26, 2016. Changes in market prices for corn and soybean meal, the primary ingredients in the feed we use, result in changes in our cost of goods sold.   The cost of feed ingredients, which are commodities, are subject to factors over which we have little or no control such as volatile price changes caused by weather, size of harvest, transportation and storage costs, demand, and the agricultural and energy policies of the U.S. and foreign governments.  We anticipate significantLarge U.S. corn and soybean crops have been harvested in 2017, which combined with the large 2016 crops should provide an adequate supply of our primary feed ingredients induring the remainder of fiscal 2018. 

While the recent hurricanes that hit the United States following the end ofU.S. during our first fiscal 2018 second quarter of 2018 caused disruptions to our operations in Texas, Florida and Georgia, we did not sustain any material loss of egg production.

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will settle the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $52.8 million net of tax, or $1.09 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company has recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2018.

Index

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.

  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 93.4 % 104.0 %
Gross profit (loss) 6.6 % (4.0)%
Selling, general, and administrative expense 15.9 % 16.8 %
Operating loss (9.3)% (20.8)%
Other income (expense), net (0.1)% 0.8 %
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (9.4)% (20.0)%
Income tax benefit 3.2 % 7.3 %
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (12.6)% (27.3)%
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (0.1)%  %
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (12.5)% (27.3)%
Index

  13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
  December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 77.2 % 98.4 % 84.0 % 101.1 %
Gross profit (loss) 22.8 % 1.6 % 16.0 % (1.1)%
Selling, general, and administrative expense 11.7 % 16.6 % 13.4 % 16.7 %
Legal settlement expense 22.3 %  % 13.0 %  %
Loss on disposal of fixed assets  % 0.1 %  % 0.1 %
Operating loss (11.2)% (15.1)% (10.4)% (17.9)%
Other income (expense), net 0.1 % 0.6 %  % 0.7 %
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (11.1)% (14.5)% (10.4)% (17.2)%
Income tax benefit (3.9)% (5.4)% (3.6)% (6.3)%
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (7.2)% (9.1)% (6.8)% (10.9)%
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  %  %  %  %
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (7.2)% (9.1)% (6.8)% (10.9)%

NET SALES

Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 were $262.8$361.2 million, an increase of $23.0$107.7 million, or 9.6%42.4%, compared to net sales of $239.8$253.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27,November 26, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in egg selling prices and, to a lesser extent, an increase in dozens sold.

Shell egg sales made up approximately 98%97.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017.  Dozens sold for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal year 2018 were 249.4263.1 million, a 2.9%4.3% increase from 242.3252.2 million dozen for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2017. The volume increase accounted for a $6.8$10.6 million increase in net sales. 

Net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.017$1.321 for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, compared to $0.952$0.971 for the thirteen weeks ended August 27,November 26, 2016. The 6.8%36.0% increase in average selling price accounted for a $15.7$92.1 million increase in net sales.  Net average selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell eggs, including non-graded shell egg sales, breaking stock, and undergrades.    

Egg products and other revenues accounted for 2%3.0% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017. These revenues were $6.1$10.8 million for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, compared to $5.6$6.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27,November 26, 2016.

Net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 were $624.0 million, an increase of $130.6 million, or 26.5%, compared to net sales of $493.4 million for the twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2016. The increase was primarily due to an increase in egg selling prices and, to a lesser extent, an increase in dozens sold.

Shell egg sales made up approximately 97.3% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017.  Dozens sold for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 were 512.5 million, a 3.6% increase from 494.5 million dozen for the same period of fiscal 2017. The volume increase accounted for a $17.4 million increase in net sales. 

Net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.173 for the twenty-six weeks endedDecember 2, 2017, compared to $0.962 for the twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2016. The 21.9% increase in average selling price accounted for a $108.1 million increase in net sales.     

Index

Egg products and other revenues accounted for 2.7% of net sales for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017. These revenues were $17.0 million for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, compared to $11.9 million for the twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2016.

The table below represents an analysis of our non-specialty and specialty shell egg sales (in thousands, except percentage data).  Following the table is a discussion of the information presented in the table.
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016
Total net sales $262,845
   $239,845
   $361,172
   $253,544
   $624,017
   $493,389
  
                        
Non-specialty shell egg $146,048
 56.9% $113,504
 48.4% $228,975
 65.4% $123,008
 49.8% $374,758
 61.7% $236,512
 49.2%
Specialty shell egg 101,697
 39.6% 109,312
 46.7% 113,293
 32.3% 113,224
 45.8% 214,990
 35.4% 222,536
 46.2%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 6,080
 2.4% 8,455
 3.6% 5,839
 1.7% 8,514
 3.4% 11,919
 2.0% 16,969
 3.5%
Other 2,884
 1.1% 2,997
 1.3% 2,211
 0.6% 2,485
 1.0% 5,360
 0.9% 5,482
 1.1%
Net shell egg sales $256,709
 100.0% $234,268
 100.0% $350,318
 100.0% $247,231
 100.0% $607,027
 100.0% $481,499
 100.0%
                        
Net shell egg sales as a percent of total net sales 98%   98%   97.0%   97.5%   97.3%   97.6%  
                        
Dozens sold:                        
Non-specialty shell egg 192,168
 77.0% 182,730
 75.4% 200,449
 76.2% 191,383
 75.9% 392,617
 76.6% 374,113
 75.7%
Specialty shell egg 54,138
 21.7% 55,399
 22.9% 59,544
 22.6% 56,540
 22.4% 113,681
 22.2% 111,939
 22.6%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 3,158
 1.3% 4,196
 1.7% 3,093
 1.2% 4,254
 1.7% 6,251
 1.2% 8,449
 1.7%
Total dozens sold 249,464
 100.0% 242,325
 100.0% 263,086
 100.0% 252,177
 100.0% 512,549
 100.0% 494,501
 100.0%
                        
Net average selling price per dozen:                        
Non-specialty shell eggs $0.760
   $0.621
   $1.142
   $0.643
   $0.955
   $0.632
  
Specialty shell eggs $1.878
   $1.973
   $1.903
   $2.003
   $1.891
   $1.988
  
All shell eggs $1.017
   $0.952
   $1.321
   $0.971
   $1.173
   $0.962
  

Non-specialty shell eggs include all shell egg sales not specifically identified as specialty or co-pack specialty shell egg sales.   This market is characterized generally by an inelasticity of demand. Small increases or decreases in production or demand can have a large positive or adverse effect on selling prices.  For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold increased 4.7%, and the average selling price increased 77.6% to $1.142 from $0.643 for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold increased approximately 5.2%4.9%, and the average selling price increased 22.4%51.1% to $0.760$0.955 from $0.621$0.632 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

Index

Specialty shell eggs, which include nutritionally enhanced, cage-free, organic, and brown eggs continue to make up a large portion of our total shell egg revenue and dozens sold.  Specialty egg retail prices are less cyclical than non-specialty shell egg prices and are generally higher due to consumer willingness to pay for the perceived benefits from these products.  This was particularly evident in recent quarters prior to our first quarter of fiscal 20182017 as non-specialty egg prices declined more than specialty egg prices.  However, as non-specialty egg prices declined, we experienced some margin and volume pressures on specialty egg sales.  For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, specialty shell egg dozens sold decreased 2.3%increased 5.3%, andbut the average selling price decreased 4.8%5.0% to $1.878$1.903 from $1.973$2.003 for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, specialty shell egg dozens sold increased 1.6%, but the average selling price decreased 4.9% to $1.891 from $1.988 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

Co-pack specialty shell eggs are sold primarily through co-pack arrangements, a common practice in the industry whereby production and processing of certain products is outsourced to another producer.  Shell egg sales in this category represented 1.3% and 1.7% dozen for the quarters ended September 2, 2017 and August 27, 2016.  Co-pack specialty shell
Index

eggs sold during the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 and August 27,November 26, 2016 were 3.26.3 million and 4.28.4 million, which represented 1.2% and 1.7% of total dozens sold for those periods, respectively.

The shell egg sales classified as “Other” represent sales of hard cooked eggs, hatching eggs, and other miscellaneous products, which are included with our shell egg operations. 

Egg products are shell eggs that are broken and sold in liquid, frozen, or dried form.  Our egg products are sold through our consolidated subsidiaries American Egg Products, LLC (“AEP”) and Texas Egg Products, LLC (“TEP”). 

For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, second quarter of fiscal 2018, egg product sales were $6.1$10.8 million, an increase of $559,000,$4.5 million , or 10.0%71.9%, compared to $5.6$6.3 million for the same period of 2017. Pounds sold for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017secondquarter of fiscal2018 were 15.514.3 million, an increasea decrease of 1.1 million, or 7.9%13.9%, compared to 14.416.6 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The selling price per pound for the secondquarter of fiscal2018 was $0.760 compared to $0.387 for the same period of fiscal 2017, a 96.4% increase.

For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, egg product sales were $17.0 million, an increase of $5.1 million, or 42.9%, compared to $11.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. Pounds sold for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 were 29.9 million, a decrease of 1.0 million, or 3.4%, compared to 30.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The selling price per pound for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 was $0.572 compared to $0.392 for the same period of fiscal 2017, a 46.1% increase.

COST OF SALES

Cost of sales consists of costs directly related to production, processing and packing of shell eggs, purchases of shell eggs from outside producers, processing and packing of liquid and frozen egg products, and other non-egg costs.  Farm production costs are those costs incurred at the egg production facility, including feed, facility, hen amortization, and other related farm production costs.

Index

The following table presents the key variables affecting cost of sales (in thousands, except cost per dozen data).
໿
໿
໿
໿
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 26 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 Percent Change December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 Percent Change December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 Percent Change
Cost of Sales:                  
Farm production 144,289
 142,871
 1.0 % 151,902
 144,581
 5.1 % 296,191
 287,452
 3.0 %
Processing, packaging, and warehouse 51,111
 46,302
 10.4 % 53,707
 47,988
 11.9 % 104,819
 94,291
 11.2 %
Egg purchases and other (including change in inventory) 43,780
 55,593
 (21.2)% 64,276
 52,433
 22.6 % 108,054
 108,026
  %
Total shell eggs 239,180
 244,766
 (2.3)% 269,885
 245,002
 10.2 % 509,064
 489,769
 3.9 %
Egg products 6,044
 4,299
 40.6 % 8,722
 4,434
 96.7 % 14,767
 8,732
 69.1 %
Other 285
 349
 (18.3)% 169
 160
 5.6 % 454
 509
 (10.8)%
Total $245,509
 $249,414
 (1.6)% $278,776
 $249,596
 11.7 % $524,285
 $499,010
 5.1 %
                  
                  
Farm production cost (per dozen produced)                  
Feed $0.375
 $0.431
 (13.0)% $0.388
 $0.394
 (1.5)% $0.382
 $0.412
 (7.3)%
Other $0.306
 $0.294
 4.1 % $0.298
 $0.294
 1.4 % $0.301
 $0.294
 2.4 %
Total $0.681
 $0.725
 (6.1)% $0.686
 $0.688
 (0.3)% $0.683
 $0.706
 (3.3)%
                  
Outside egg purchases (average cost per dozen) $0.98
 $1.03
 (4.9)% $1.39
 $0.98
 41.8 % $1.20
 $1.01
 18.8 %
                  
Dozen produced 213,570
 198,782
 7.4 % 222,889
 211,971
 5.2 % 436,459
 410,753
 6.3 %
Dozen sold 249,464
 242,325
 2.9 % 263,086
 252,177
 4.3 % 512,549
 494,501
 3.6 %

Cost of sales for the firstsecondquarter of fiscal2018 was $278.8 million, an increase of $29.2 million, or 11.7%, from $249.6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2017. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in the cost of eggs purchased and increased dozens produced for the quarter. Feed cost per dozen for the secondquarter of fiscal2018 was $245.5 million,$0.388, compared to $0.394 per dozen for the second quarter of fiscal 2017, a decrease of $3.91.5%, resulting in a decrease in cost of sales of approximately $1.3 million. Other farm production cost increased 1.4% to $0.298 for the secondquarter of fiscal2018 compared to $0.294 for the same period of last year.

Cost of sales for the twenty-six weeks endedDecember 2, 2017 was $524.3 million, an increase of $25.3 million, or 1.6%5.1%, from $249.4$499.0 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The decreaseincrease was primarily driven by an increase in dozens produced during the period and, to a decrease inlesser extent, the volume andincreased cost of egg purchases during the period.eggs purchased in fiscal 2018. Dozens produced increased 7.4%6.3% resulting in higher farm production, processing, and packaging costs. These increases were offset by a lower feed cost per dozen produced. Feed cost per dozen for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, was $0.375,$0.382, compared to $0.431$0.412 per dozen for the comparable period of fiscal 2017, a decrease of 13.0%7.3%, resulting in a decrease in cost of sales of $12.0approximately $12.3 million for the comparable period. Other farm production cost increased 4.1%2.4% to $0.306$0.301 for the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, compared to $0.294 for the same period of last year primarily due to increased layer hen amortization expense and facility costs related to capital improvement and conversion projects.

Gross profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 was $82.4 million compared to $3.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2017. For the twenty-six weeks ended ended December 2, 2017, gross profit increased to $17.3$99.7 million from a loss of $5.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, compared to a loss of $9.6 million  for the first quartersame period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to the increased average customer selling prices and sales volumes. 
 

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general, and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting, and corporate overhead.  The following table presents an analysis of our selling, general, and administrative expenses (in thousands).

 13 Weeks Ended
 Actual 
Less: Acquisitions*
 Net       13 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 $ Change % Change December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $11,734
 $337
 $11,397
 $13,057
 $(1,660) (12.7)% $11,840
 $13,773
 $(1,933) (14.0)%
Delivery expense 13,124
 1,016
 12,108
 12,560
 (452) (3.6)% 13,113
 13,136
 (23) (0.2)%
Payroll and overhead 9,496
 724
 8,772
 8,438
 334
 4.0 % 8,246
 8,723
 (477) (5.5)%
Stock compensation expense 859
 
 859
 848
 11
 1.3 % 879
 808
 71
 8.8 %
Other expenses 6,497
 1,273
 5,224
 5,353
 (129) (2.4)% 8,082
 5,551
 2,531
 45.6 %
Total $41,710
 $3,350
 $38,360
 $40,256
 $(1,896) (4.7)% $42,160
 $41,991
 $169
 0.4 %
            
*Represents amounts in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 related to our fiscal 2017 acquisitions, Foodonics International, Inc, and Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc., which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017.


໿
For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, selling, general, and administrative expenses was $41.7$42.2 million an increase of $1.4 million, or 3.5%, compared to $40.3$42.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27,November 26, 2016. The impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions, which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017, was a $3.4 million increase to SG&A in the first quarter of 2018.

Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, specialtySpecialty egg expense decreased $1.7$1.9 million, or 12.7%14.0%, compared to the same period of last year. Specialty egg expense typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which decreased 2.3%increased 5.3% for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 compared to the same period of last year. Advertising2017; however, this was more than offset by reduced advertising expense, which is a component of specialty egg expense for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017and decreased 19.5% from106.1% compared to the same period of fiscal 2017.2017 due to an increase in refunded promotional allowances. Payroll and overhead increased $334,000,decreased $477,000, or 4.0%5.5%, compared to the same period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to timing of bonus accruals. Other expenses increased 45.6% to $8.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended December 2, 2017 bonus accruals being adjustedfrom $5.6 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to actual payments which were madeincreased bad debt expense in the first quartercurrent period as well as amortization of intangible assets related to the impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions.

  26 Weeks Ended
  December 2, 2017 November 26, 2016 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $23,574
 $26,829
 $(3,255) (12.1)%
Delivery expense 26,237
 25,696
 541
 2.1 %
Payroll and overhead 17,743
 17,162
 581
 3.4 %
Stock compensation expense 1,738
 1,656
 82
 5.0 %
Other expenses 14,578
 10,904
 3,674
 33.7 %
Total $83,870
 $82,247
 $1,623
 2.0 %

໿
For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, selling, general, and administrative expenses was $83.9 million, an increase of $1.6 million, or 2.0%, compared to $82.2 million for the twenty-six weeks endedNovember 26, 2016. Specialty egg expense decreased $3.3 million, or 12.1%, compared to the same period of last year. Specialty egg expense typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which increased 1.6% for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, however this was more than offset by reduced advertising expense, which is a component of specialty egg expense and decreased 70.3% compared to the same period for fiscal 2017 due to an increase in refunded promotional allowances. Payroll and overhead increased $581,000, or 3.4%, compared to the same period of fiscal 2018.2017 primarily due to timing of bonus accruals. Delivery expense decreased $452,000increased $541,000 or 3.6%2.1%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to the impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions. Other expenses increased 33.7% to $14.6 million for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 from $10.9 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased amortization of intangible assets related to the impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions as well as increases in bad debt, legal, audit and professional expenses.

LEGAL SETTLEMENT EXPENSE

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company will settle the claims
Index

with a decrease in contract trucking cost.single $80.8 million payment, which is $52.8 million net of tax, or $1.09 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company has recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017.

LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF FIXED ASSETS

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017During twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2016 we recorded a $525,000$740,000 loss on disposal of fixed assets due to a roof replacement at one of our Texas locations.

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

As a result of the above, operating loss was $24.4$40.5 million for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2018, compared to $50.4$38.3 million for the fiscal 2017 firstsecond quarter. 

For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, we recorded an operating loss of $64.8 million compared to a loss of $88.6 million for the same period of fiscal 2017.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)    

Total other income (expense) consists of items not directly charged to, or related to, operations such as interest income and expense, royalty income, equity in income or loss of affiliates, and patronage income, among other items.  

For the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2018, we recorded $504,000$618,000 of interest income compared to $1.1 million$781,000 for the same period of last year.   The decrease resulted primarily from lower average invested balances. The Company recorded interest expense of $146,000$245,000 and $387,000,$370,000, of which $116,000$205,000 and $379,000$370,000 was capitalized, in the firstsecond quarters of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.  These changesThe $125,000 reduction in interest expense resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt and capitalizing less interest due to a reduction in major expansion and renovation projects.

Index
debt.

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2018 was a lossincome of $353,000$276,000 compared to income of $191,000$645,000 for the same period of last year.  The decrease of $544,000$369,000 is primarily due to losses at our Red River joint venture.

Other, net for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, was a loss of $538,000$795,000 compared with incomea loss of $122,000$260,000 for the same period of last year, a decrease of $660,000, primarily driven by a reduction in miscellaneous income and an increase in uninsured losses in the current period.

For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, we recorded $1.1 million of interest income compared to $1.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The decrease resulted primarily from lower average invested balances. The Company recorded interest expense of $160,000 and $757,000, of which $90,000 and $749,000 was capitalized, for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 and November 26, 2016, respectively. The $597,000 reduction in interest expense resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt.

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 was a loss of $77,000 compared to income of $836,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017. The decrease of $913,000 is primarily due to losses at our Red River joint venture.

Other, net for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, was a loss of $1.3 million compared to a loss of $138,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017, primarily driven by an increase in uninsured losses in the current period and a reduction in miscellaneous income.

Index

INCOME TAXES

Pre-tax loss, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $40.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended December 2, 2017, compared to pre-tax loss, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $36.8 million for last year’s comparable period.  For the current thirteen-week period, income tax benefit of $14.0 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 34.9%, compared to an income tax benefit of $13.8 million, with an effective rate of 37.5%, for last year’s comparable period.

For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $24.3$64.6 million, for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, compared to pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $48.5$85.3 million for last year’s comparable period.the same period of fiscal 2017. For the current thirteen-week period, antwenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 income tax benefit of $8.3$22.4 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 34.3%34.7%, compared to an income tax benefit of $17.6$31.4 million, with an effective rate of 36.2%,36.8% for last year’syear's comparable period.

The effective rate decrease for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 was primarily related to the projectedanticipated carryback of projected net operatingtaxable losses, as the carryback reducedreduces prior year taxable income and as a result reduces the benefit of domestic manufacturers deductions, a portion of which was therefore reversed in the current period.periods.

At SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, the Company had recorded an income tax receivablepayable of $56.0 million, an increase of $3.3$5.3 million compared to an income tax receivable of $52.7 million at June 3, 2017. This increaseThe change is primarily due to incomereceipt during the second quarter of fiscal 2018 of a $45.0 million federal tax benefit recorded on net losses forrefund related to the carryback of fiscal year 2018.2017 losses.

Our effective rate differs from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes and certain items included in income for financial reporting purposes that are not included in taxable income for income tax purposes, including tax exempt interest income, and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act tax reform legislation. While the Company continues to assess the impact of the tax reform legislation on its business and consolidated financial statements, the legislation does reduce the U.S. corporate tax rate from the current rate of 35% to 21%. At December 2, 2017, the Company had a deferred tax liability of approximately $75.3 million based on a U.S. federal tax rate of 35%. Since this legislation was enacted after the close of our second quarter of fiscal 2018, this liability will be revalued at a lower rate during our third quarter of fiscal 2018, which ends on March 3, 2018. This revaluation will result in a benefit to income tax expense in continuing operations and a corresponding reduction in the deferred tax liability. Consequently, the Company’s effective tax rate for the thirteen and twenty-six ended December 2, 2017 does not include the impact of any potential tax reform, as it was not enacted before December 2, 2017. The Company expects a reduction to its effective tax rate for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ending March 3, 2018.

NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

For the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $55,000 compared to $43,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

For the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest was $184,000$129,000 compared to $44,000$1,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017. This is attributable to income and losses from the Company's consolidated joint ventures.

NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.

Net loss for the thirteen weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 was $16.0$26.1 million, or $0.33$0.54 per basic and diluted share, compared $30.9to $23.0 million, or $0.64$0.48 per basic and diluted share for the same period last year.

Index

Net loss for the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 was $42.1 million, or $0.87 per basic and diluted share, compared to $53.9 million, or $1.12 per basic and diluted share, for the same period of fiscal 2017.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Our working capital at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 was $357.5$311.2 million, compared to $371.5 million at June 3, 2017. The calculation of working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities. Our current ratio was 6.672.78 at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, compared with 6.74 at June 3, 2017. The decrease was due primarily to net lossesthe accrual of the legal settlement expense and higher accounts payable balances at period end due to the increase in recent periods, along with the usecost of cash for capital expenditures.purchased eggs. We have $4.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit, which are collateralized by cash for the benefit of certain insurance companies. Our long-term debt at SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, including current maturities, amounted to $9.7$8.5 million, compared to $10.9 million at June 3, 2017. Refer to Note 9 of our June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our long-term debt.
  
For the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, $21.5$64.8 million in net cash was used inprovided by operating activities, a decreasean improvement of $24.0$135.0 million, compared to net cash used in operations of $45.4$70.2 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2017.   Improved gross profit margins primarily resulting from higher sales volumes and egg selling prices as well as increased accounts payable at December 2, 2017 contributed to our increase in cash flow from operations.

Index

For the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, approximately $34.1$61.7 million was provided from the sale of short-term investments compared to $193.3 million for the twenty-six weeks ended November 26, 2016. We used $112.8 million and we used $2.7$13.3 million for purchases of short-term investments compared to $92.8 million in salesfor the twenty-six weeks ended December 2, 2017 and $9.0 million in purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.  November 26, 2016, respectively.
We invested an additional $1.2$2.8 million in our Red River Valley Egg Farm, LLC joint venture (“Red River JV”) compared to $5.5$10.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2017.  Approximately $6.5$10.2 million was used to purchase property, plant and equipment including construction projects discussed in detail below, compared to $23.9$40.6 million in the thirteentwenty-six weeks ended August 27,November 26, 2016.  This decrease represents the completion of several major expansion projects over the past twelve months. In fiscal 2017 we used $68.6 million for the acquisition of Foodonics International, Inc.

As of SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, cash increased approximately $1.4$2.2 million since June 3, 2017 compared to an increase of $8.6$11.6 million during the same period of fiscal 2017.

To accommodateOver the past five fiscal years the Company has completed over $300 million in capital expenditures. The Company has completed the majority of previously discussed increase in customers committingreported expansion projects. We anticipate future cage-free expansion projects to cage-free eggs over time, we expect that future expansions at our farms will be with environments that are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be convertedarise as needed to cage-free, based on a timeline that meets our customer’s needs.  The following table represents material construction projects approved as of September 28, 2017 (in thousands):meet customer demand.
໿

໿
Project Location Projected Completion Projected Cost Incurred as of September 2, 2017 Remaining Projected Cost
Cage-Free Layer Houses Lake City, FL September 2017 $8,669
 $8,614
 $55
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer House with Pullets South Texas September 2017 11,641
 11,626
 15
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses Green Forest, AR October 2017 8,991
 8,753
 238
Cage-Free Layer Houses South Texas November 2017 4,063
 3,904
 159
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses with Pullets Guthrie, KY January 2018 13,252
 12,194
 1,058
      $46,616
 $45,091
 $1,525

In addition to these projects, theThe Company expects to continue to fund its 50% share of the Red River JV.  As of September 28,December 29, 2017, we have contributed $55.6$56.7 million to the joint venture to fund our share of construction, startup costs, and operating losses. We estimate we will make additional contributions of approximately $7$6 million to fund our share of the remaining construction costs.

Property, plant, and equipment at certain of our locations is pledged as collateral on our notes payable and senior secured notes.  Unless otherwise approved by our lenders, we are required by provisions of our loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum levels of working capital (current ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth, plus 45% of cumulative net income since the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005); (2) limit dividends paid in any given quarter to not exceed an amount equal to one third of the previous quarter’s consolidated net income (allowed if no events of default); (3) maintain minimum total funded debt to total capitalization (not to exceed 55%); and (4) maintain various cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At SeptemberDecember 2, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenant requirements of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in control, as defined in the applicable loan agreement. Our debt agreements require Fred R. Adams,
Index

Jr., our Founder and Chairman Emeritus, or his family, to maintain ownership of Company shares representing not less than 50% of the outstanding voting power of the Company.    

We believe our current cash balances, investments, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our current and projected capital needs for at least the next twelve months.

Index

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09). The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services.  In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 until annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. To date the Company’s assessments efforts include evaluation of certain revenue contracts with customers and the method of retrospective application, either full or modified.  We currently expect to utilize the full retrospective transition on date of adoption.  Based on the findings to date, the Company does not  expect ASU 2014-09 to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position; however, the Company’s assessment is not complete.  The Company plans to complete its review and method of adoption in fiscal 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases.  The purpose of the standard is to improve transparency and comparability related to the accounting and reporting of leasing arrangements.  The guidance will require balance sheet recognition for assets and liabilities associated with rights and obligations created by leases with terms greater than twelve months.  ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early adoption is permitted.  Based on the findings to date, the Company does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position; however, the Company's assessment is not complete.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As a result, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units' fair value. The guidance is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, our fiscal 2021. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017, and the prospective transition method should be applied. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES    

We suggest our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017, be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2017.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017.

Index

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended SeptemberDecember 2, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
           
Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearperiod ended June 3,September 2, 2017, under Part I,II, Item 3:1:  Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following: 
Litigation

Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2017, under Part I Item 3: Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following: 

Egg Antitrust Litigation

SinceOn September 25, 2008, the Company has beenwas named as one of several defendants in numerous antitrust cases involving the United States shell egg industry. The cases were consolidated into In somere: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “District Court”), in three (3) groups of cases - the “Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action”, the “Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action” and the “Non-Class Cases.”

The Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action. The named plaintiffs in these cases the named plaintiffs allegealleged that they purchased eggs or egg products directly from a defendant and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claimclaimed to be similarly situated.  In other cases,As previously reported, in November 2014, the District Court approved the Company’s settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class and entered final judgment dismissing with prejudice the class members’ claims against the Company.

The Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action.  The named plaintiffs allege that they purchased shell eggs and egg products directly from one or more of the defendants but sue only for their own alleged damages and not on behalf of a putative class.  In the remainingin these cases the named plaintiffs are individuals or companies who allege that they purchased shell eggs indirectly from one or more of the defendants - that is, they purchased from retailers that had previously purchased from defendants or other parties - and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claim to be similarly situated.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all of the putative class actions (as well as certain other cases in which the Company was not a named defendant) for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania court organized the putative class actions around two groups (direct purchasers and indirect purchasers) and named interim lead counsel for the named plaintiffs in each group.

Index

The Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action. The direct purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As previously reported, in November 2014, the Court approved the Company’s settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class and entered final judgment dismissing with prejudice the class members’ claims against the Company.

The Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action.  The indirect purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  On April 20-21, 2015, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motionplaintiffs have filed two (2) motions for class certification. On September 18, 2015, the Court denied the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for classcertification, one of which sought certification of 21 separate classes seeking damages under the laws of 21 states holding that the plaintiffs were not able to prove that their purported method for ascertaining class membership was reliable or administratively feasible, that common questions would predominate, or that their proposed class approach would be manageable in a single trial.  In addition to barring any right to pursue a class monetary remedy under state law, the Court also denied indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ request forand another which sought certification of an injunctive-relief class under federal law. However,law, and the court allowedDistrict Court has denied both of these motions. After each ruling, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs to renew their motion for class certification seeking a federal injunction. The plaintiffs filed their renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class on October 23, 2015. The Company joined the other defendants in opposing that motion on November 20.  The plaintiffs filed their reply memorandum on December 11, 2015, and on March 7, 2017, the Court heard arguments on the renewed motion for injunctive class certification. On June 27, 2017, the Court denied plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. The plaintiffs also filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, asking thethat court to hear an immediate appeal of the trial court’s denial of the motionDistrict Court’s refusal to certify 21 state-law damages classes. On December 3, 2015, the Third Circuit entered an order staying its consideration of the plaintiffs’ request for an immediate appeal of the damages-class ruling pending the trial court’s resolution of the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to certify an injunctive-reliefa class. On July 11, 2017 the plaintiffs filed a petition with the Third Circuit asking the court to hear an immediate appeal of the June 27 order denying plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. On July 21, 2017, the Company joined other defendants in a response filed with the Third Circuit opposing the plaintiffs' latest petition. The Third Circuit denied both petitions. Therefore, there is no certified class in the indirect purchaser putative class action case, although the plaintiffs could appeal the denials of class certification after a trial on the merits. At this
Index

time, all that remains for trial are the claims of the individual named plaintiffs, who seek treble damages under the statutes and common law of various states and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act attacking certain features of the United Egg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines and program used by the Company and many other egg producers. Management believes that neither the aggregate treble damages nor the injunctive relief sought by the individual plaintiffs in these cases, even if awarded, would be material to the Company. The District Court has not yet ruled on either petition.set a trial date for the indirect purchaser case.

The Non-Class Cases. Six ofIn the remaining cases, in whichthe named plaintiffs do not seek to certify a class have been consolidated with the putative class actions into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court granted with prejudice the defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss the non-class plaintiffs’ claims for damages arising before September 24, 2004. On July 2, 2015, the Company filed and joined several motions for summary judgmentallege that sought either dismissal of all of the claims in all of these cases or, in the alternative, dismissal of portions of these cases. On July 2, 2015, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of certain affirmative defenses based on statutory immunities from federal antitrust law. The Court heard oral argument on the motions for summary judgment on February 22 and 23, 2016. On September 6, 2016, the Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs’ claims arising from their purchases of egg products, dismissing those claims with prejudice. On September 9, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on liability, dismissing as a matter of law the plaintiffs’ allegations of a side agreement to cease construction of new facilities and ruling that the plaintiffs’ allegations against United Egg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines must be evaluated at trial under the rule of reason. On September 12, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on damages, ruling that plaintiffs cannot recover damages arising from purchases of eggs from non-defendants and cannot recover any relief arising fromthey purchased shell eggs and egg products produceddirectly from one or sold in Arizona after October 1, 2009, the date that Arizona mandated that all eggs sold or produced in that state must be produced in compliance with the 2008 versionmore of the UEP animal-welfare guidelines.defendants but sue only for their own alleged damages and not on behalf of a putative class.  On September 13, 2016,December 29, 2017, the Court granted in part the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgmentCompany entered into a Binding Agreement as to Material Terms to resolve all claims brought by the applicability offollowing non-class plaintiffs: The Kroger Co.; Publix Super Markets, Inc.; SUPERVALU, Inc.; Safeway, Inc.; Albertsons LLC; H.E. Butt Grocery Co.; The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Hy-Vee, Inc.; and Giant Eagle, Inc. Pursuant to the Capper-Volstead defense, ruling that United States Egg Marketers (an industry cooperative ofagreement, which the Company is a member) may invoke the defense at trial but that UEP (another industry cooperative of whichparties intend to be legally binding, the Company isagreed to pay the non-class plaintiffs $80.8 million within 45 days of all parties signing a member) cannot.formal settlement agreement, and the parties agreed to work in good faith to prepare and execute the formal settlement agreement no later than January 10, 2018. The Capper-Volstead defense is a defense pursuantparties agreed to resolve any disputes relating to the Capper-Volstead Act (the Co-operative Marketing Associations Act)agreement through binding arbitration.

The only non-class plaintiffs that are not included in the agreement are the following companies that sought substantial damages allegedly arising from the purchase of egg products (as opposed to shell eggs): Conopco, Inc., enacted by Congress in 1922, which gives certain associations of farmers certain exemptions from antitrust laws. On October 4, 2016, certain direct action plaintiffs (KraftKraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) filed an appeal toCompany. The egg products plaintiffs sought treble damages and injunctive relief under the
Index

Sherman Act attacking certain features of the United States Court of Appeals forEgg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines and program used by the Third Circuit from the District Court’s Order datedCompany and many other egg producers. On September 6, 2016, grantingthe District Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissingdismissed with prejudice all claims based on the purchase of egg products. These plaintiffs filed their opening brief on March 7, 2017. The defendants filed their response brief on April 20. These plaintiffs filed their reply brief on May 18. The courtThat ruling has been appealed to the United States Court of appealsAppeals for the Third Circuit, which heard oral argument on July 11, 2017, but has not issued a ruling. On November 22, 2016, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Court to hold a status conference and asking the court to set the non-class cases for trial in June of 2017. The parties in all of the remaining class and non-class cases submitted several different proposed trial schedules to the court, and a status conference was held on February 9, 2017. On August 11, 2017, the Company and certain other defendants filed a motion to exclude damage calculations by direct action plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Baye. The direct action plaintiffs filed a motion to strike on August 25, 2017, and then filed a memorandum in support thereof on August 28, 2017. On September 8, the Company and the other moving defendants filed a response to the plaintiffs’ motion to strike. The court has scheduled a hearing on these latest motions for October 25, 2017.

Allegations in Each Case. In all of the cases described above, the plaintiffs allege that the Company and certain other large domestic egg producers conspired to reduce the domestic supply of eggs in a concerted effort to raise the price of eggs to artificially high levels. In each case, plaintiffs allege that all defendants agreed to reduce the domestic supply of eggs by: (a) agreeing to limit production; (b) manipulating egg exports; and (c) implementing industry-wide animal welfare guidelines that reduced the number of hens and eggs.

The named plaintiffs in the remaining indirect purchaser putative class action seek treble damages under the statutes and common-law of various states and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act on behalf of themselves and all other putative class members in the United States. Although plaintiffs allege a class period starting in October, 2006 and running “through the present,” the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify classes seeking damages under the laws of 21 states and denied the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class, as discussed above.

Five of the original six non-class cases remain pending against the Company. The principal plaintiffs in these cases are: The Kroger Co.; Publix Super Markets, Inc.; SUPERVALU, Inc.; Safeway, Inc.; Albertsons LLC; H.E. Butt Grocery Co.; The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Hy-Vee, Inc.; and Giant Eagle, Inc. In four of these remaining non-class cases, the plaintiffs seek treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act.  In one of those four cases, the plaintiffs purchased only egg products, and as noted above, the Court dismissed with prejudice all claims arising from the purchase of egg products. On October 4, 2016, the four plaintiffs in that case (Kraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In the fifth remaining non-class case, the plaintiff seeks treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act and the Ohio antitrust act (known as the Valentine Act).

The Pennsylvania court has entered a series of orders related to case management, discovery, class certification, summary judgment, and scheduling.  The Court has also denied all four motions that the plaintiffs filed to exclude testimony from certain expert witnesses retained by the defendants. The court’s latest Case Management Order (No. 23) was filed on September 20, 2017, and indicated that the non-class plaintiffs’ cases would be set for trial later in calendar year 2018.

The Company intends to continue to defend the remaining cases as vigorously as possible based on defenses which the Company believes are meritorious and provable.  While management believes that the likelihood of a material adverse outcome in the overall egg antitrust litigation has been significantly reduced as a result of the settlements and rulings described above, there is still a reasonable possibility of a material adverse outcome in the remaining egg antitrust litigation. At the present time, however, it is not possible to estimate the amount of monetary exposure, if any, to the Company because of these cases. Accordingly, adjustments,Adjustments, if any, which might result from the resolution of these remaining legal matters, have not been reflected in the financial statements.

Other Matters

In addition to the above, the Company is involved in various other claims and litigation incidental to its business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined with certainty, management, upon the advice of counsel,
Index

is of the opinion that the final outcome should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

At this time, it is not possible for us to predict the ultimate outcome of the matters set forth above.
 
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
                     
In the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017, we discussed rules proposed by the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") Agricultural Marketing Service that, if adopted, would have increased our costs to produce organic eggs. As of December 2017, the USDA proposed withdrawal of these rules. If the withdrawal is finalized, existing organic poultry regulations would remain effective.

Index

There have been no other material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on  Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table is a summary of our firstsecond quarter 2018 share repurchases:
      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
06/04/17 to 07/01/17 519
 $39.60
 
 
07/02/17 to 07/29/17 
 
 
 
07/30/17 to 09/02/17 
 
 
 
  519
 $39.60
 
 
      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
09/03/17 to 09/30/17 119
 $40.95
 
 
10/01/17 to 10/28/17 
 
 
 
10/29/17 to 12/02/17 
 
 
 
  119
 $40.95
 
 

(1) As permitted under our 2012 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan, these shares were withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations for employees in connection with the vesting of common stock.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits
No. Description
3.1 
3.2 
31.1* 
31.2* 
32** 
99.1 
101.INS*+ XBRL Instance Document Exhibit 
101.SCH*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Exhibit 
101.CAL*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Exhibit 
101.LAB*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document Exhibit 
101.PRE*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
   
* Filed herewith as an Exhibit.
** Furnished herewith as an Exhibit.
+ Submitted electronically with this Quarterly Report.

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Registrant)

Date:October 2, 2017January 5, 2018/s/ Timothy A. Dawson
  Timothy A. Dawson
  
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
໿
Date:October 2, 2017January 5, 2018/s/ Michael D. Castleberry
  Michael D. Castleberry
  
Vice President, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
໿


2526