Index

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549

FORM 10-Q
(mark one)

þ     Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018

OR

¨     Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number:  000-04892

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 64-0500378
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S Employer Identification No.)

3320 Woodrow Wilson Avenue, Jackson, Mississippi  39209
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(601) 948-6813
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes þ      No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
    
Large Accelerated filer þ
 
Accelerated filer  ¨
   
Non – Accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company ¨
  
Emerging growth company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨    No þ
There were 43,772,42843,832,291 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, and 4,800,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of SeptemberMarch 29, 2017.2018.


Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 2, 2017MARCH 3, 2018
     Page Number
Part I.    
      
 Item 1.   
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
    
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 3.  
      
 Item 4.  
      
Part II.    
      
 Item 1.  
      
 Item 1A.  
      
 Item 2.  
      
 Item 6.  
      
    



Index

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017
 (unaudited)   March 3, 2018 June 3, 2017
ASSETS     
 (unaudited)
  
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $18,943
 $17,564
 $106,178
 $17,564
Investment securities available-for-sale 107,028
 138,462
 177,270
 138,462
Trade and other receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of  
  
  
  
$435 and $386 at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively) 75,626
 64,509
$521 and $386 at March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017, respectively) 121,642
 64,509
Income tax receivable 55,970
 52,691
 
 52,691
Inventories 159,226
 160,692
 165,363
 160,692
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 3,753
 2,288
 2,074
 2,288
Total current assets 420,546
 436,206
 572,527
 436,206
Property, plant and equipment, net 452,099
 458,184
 433,482
 458,184
Other investments 69,435
 69,296
 70,417
 69,296
Goodwill 35,525
 35,525
 35,525
 35,525
Other intangible assets, net 28,590
 29,149
 27,018
 29,149
Other assets 4,833
 4,734
 4,714
 4,734
TOTAL ASSETS $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
 $1,143,683
 $1,033,094
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY  
  
  
  
Current liabilities:  
  
  
  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $58,386
 $59,853
 $96,071
 $59,853
Current maturities of long-term debt 4,683
 4,826
Accrued legal settlement expense - see Note 4 80,750
 
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital lease obligations 3,926
 4,826
Total current liabilities 63,069
 64,679
 180,747
 64,679
Long-term debt, less current maturities 5,048
 6,113
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current maturities 3,351
 6,113
Other noncurrent liabilities 7,565
 7,527
 8,038
 7,527
Deferred income taxes 105,881
 110,282
 51,888
 110,282
Total liabilities 181,563
 188,601
 244,024
 188,601
  
  
  
  
Commitments and Contingencies - see Note 4 

 

 

 

        
Stockholders’ equity:  
  
  
  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 120,000 and 70,261 shares authorized and issued  
  
  
  
at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively, and 43,773 and 43,777  
  
shares outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively 703
 703
at March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017, respectively, and 43,832 and 43,777  
  
shares outstanding at March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017, respectively 703
 703
Class A convertible common stock, $.01 par value, 4,800 shares authorized, issued  
  
  
  
and outstanding at September 2, 2017 and June 3, 2017, respectively  48
 48
and outstanding at March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017, respectively  48
 48
Paid-in capital 50,792
 49,932
 52,436
 49,932
Retained earnings 800,053
 816,046
 870,211
 816,046
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax (96) (128) (792) (128)
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,488 and 26,484 shares at September 3, 2017  
  
Common stock in treasury at cost – 26,431 and 26,484 shares at March 3, 2018  
  
and June 3, 2017, respectively (23,936) (23,914) (24,967) (23,914)
Total Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. stockholders’ equity 827,564
 842,687
 897,639
 842,687
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated entities 1,901
 1,806
 2,020
 1,806
Total stockholders’ equity 829,465
 844,493
 899,659
 844,493
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $1,011,028
 $1,033,094
 $1,143,683
 $1,033,094
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Net sales $262,845
 $239,845
 $435,820
 $306,540
 $1,059,837
 $799,929
Cost of sales 245,509
 249,414
 315,722
 267,375
 840,007
 766,385
Gross profit (loss) 17,336
 (9,569)
Gross profit 120,098
 39,165
 219,830
 33,544
Selling, general, and administrative expense 41,710
 40,256
 44,175
 43,738
 128,045
 125,985
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 4
 525
Operating loss (24,378) (50,350)
Legal settlement expense - see Note 4 
 
 80,750
 
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets (279) 622
 (325) 1,361
Operating income (loss) 76,202
 (5,195) 11,360
 (93,802)
Other income (expense):  
  
      
  
Interest income, net 474
 1,091
 992
 411
 2,044
 2,283
Royalty income 278
 406
 169
 381
 759
 1,111
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (353) 191
Patronage dividends 8,286
 7,608
 8,286
 7,608
Equity in income of affiliates 2,379
 1,018
 2,302
 1,854
Other, net (538) 122
 29
 (58) (1,304) (197)
Total other income (loss) (139) 1,810
Total other income 11,855
 9,360
 12,087
 12,659
            
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (24,517) (48,540)
Income tax benefit 8,340
 17,560
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (16,177) (30,980)
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936)
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 88,057
 4,165
 23,447
 (81,143)
Income tax (benefit) expense (8,301) 34
 (30,653) (31,327)
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest 96,358
 4,131
 54,100
 (49,816)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 64
 (8) (65) (9)
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $96,294
 $4,139
 $54,165
 $(49,807)
            
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:      
  
Basic $(0.33) $(0.64) $1.99
 $0.09
 $1.12
 $(1.03)
Diluted $(0.33) $(0.64) $1.99
 $0.09
 $1.12
 $(1.03)
Weighted average shares outstanding:  
  
      
  
Basic 48,330
 48,249
 48,361
 48,286
 48,340
 48,285
Diluted 48,330
 48,249
 48,476
 48,417
 48,460
 48,285

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVEINCOME(LOSS)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net loss, including noncontrolling interests $(16,177) $(30,980)
   
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:  
  
   
  
Unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments 51
 502
   
  
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (19) (191)
   
  
Other comprehensive gain, net of  tax 32
 311
   
  
Comprehensive loss (16,145) (30,669)
   
  
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest (184) (44)
   
  
Comprehensive loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,961) $(30,625)
  13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
  March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Net income (loss), including noncontrolling interests $96,358
 $4,131
 $54,100
 $(49,816)
       
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:      
  
       
  
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustments (547) 233
 (1,004) 199
       
  
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive loss 155
 (89) 340
 (75)
       
  
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of  tax (392) 144
 (664) 124
       
  
Comprehensive income (loss) 95,966
 4,275
 53,436
 (49,692)
       
  
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest 64
 (8) (65) (9)
       
  
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $95,902
 $4,283
 $53,501
 $(49,683)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Operating activities:        
Net loss including noncontrolling interest $(16,177) $(30,980)
Net income (loss) including noncontrolling interest $54,100
 $(49,816)
Depreciation and amortization 13,137
 11,159
 40,331
 35,724
Other adjustments, net (18,447) (25,626) 51,655
 (43,125)
Net cash used in operations (21,487) (45,447)
Net cash provided by (used in) operations 146,086
 (57,217)
  
  
  
  
Investing activities:  
  
  
  
Purchase of investments (2,653) (9,008) (136,921) (25,872)
Sales of investments 34,104
 92,833
 95,289
 228,327
Investment in joint ventures (1,200) (5,500)
Acquisition of business 
 (68,643)
Investment in joint venture (4,100) (17,700)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (6,517) (23,895) (13,639) (54,862)
Payments received on notes receivable and from affiliates 8
 1,250
Payments received from affiliates 5,831
 5,236
Net proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 74
 10
 579
 76
Net cash provided by investing activities 23,816
 55,690
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities (52,961) 66,562
  
  
  
  
Financing activities:   
  
  
  
Purchase of common stock by treasury (21) (40) (1,128) (1,715)
Contributions from (distributions to) noncontrolling interests 279
 (73) 279
 (73)
Principal payments on long-term debt (1,208) (1,530)
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations (3,662) (4,698)
Net cash used in financing activities (950) (1,643) (4,511) (6,486)
    
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 1,379
 8,600
 88,614
 2,859
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 17,564
 29,046
 17,564
 29,046
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $18,943
 $37,646
 $106,178
 $31,905

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 2, 2017March 3, 2018
(unaudited)
1.   Presentation of Interim Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affected reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions.  Operating results for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 2, 2018.  

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 3, 2017 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.  It does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.��

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.

2.   Stock Based Compensation

Total stock based compensation expense for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017 was $2.6 million and August 27, 2016 was $859,000 and $848,000,$2.5 million, respectively. 

Unrecognized compensation expense as a result of non-vested shares of the 2012 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan at September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 was $4.9$6.9 million and will be recorded over a weighted average period of 1.92.2 years.  Refer to Note 10 of our June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our stock compensation plans.

At September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, there were 243,150243,060 restricted shares outstanding, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $42.76$45.30 per share. The Company’s restricted share activity for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 follows:
 Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Number of Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding, June 3, 2017 247,735
 $42.76
 247,735
 $42.76
Granted 
 
 88,965
 43.81
Vested (1,750) 42.10
 (85,990) 36.76
Forfeited (2,835) 42.94
 (7,650) 41.75
Outstanding, September 2, 2017 243,150
 $42.76
Outstanding, March 3, 2018 243,060
 $45.30

Index

3.   Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Index

 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017 March 3, 2018 June 3, 2017
Flocks $97,108
 $98,059
 $92,763
 $98,059
Eggs and egg products 14,697
 14,911
 18,153
 14,911
Feed and supplies 47,421
 47,722
 54,447
 47,722
 $159,226
 $160,692
 $165,363
 $160,692

We grow and maintain flocks of layers (mature female chickens), pullets (female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), and breeders (male and female chickens used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks). Our total flock at September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, consisted of approximately 9.19.2 million pullets and breeders and 36.737.8 million layers.

4.   Contingencies

Financial Instruments
The Company maintained standby letters of credit (“LOC”) totaling $4.2 million at September 2, 2017.March 3, 2018.  The LOCs are collateralized with cash which is included in the line item “Other assets” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.    The outstanding LOCs are for the benefit of certain insurance companies, and are not recorded as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets.

Legal Contingencies
The Company is a defendant in certain legal actions, and intends to vigorously defend its position in these actions.  If the Company’s assessment of a contingency indicates it is probable a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, the estimated liability is accrued in the Company’s financial statements.    If the assessment indicates a potential material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or probable but cannot be reasonably estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss will be disclosed, or a statement will be made that such an estimate cannot be made.

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. The agreement was finalized and effective January 30, 2018. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company settled the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $54.8 million net of tax, or $1.13 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company paid the settlement on March 23, 2018, subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2018 third quarter.

These legal actions are discussed in detail at Part II, Item 1, of this report.

Index

5.   Net LossIncome (Loss) per Common Share  

Basic net lossincome (loss) per share was calculated by dividing net lossincome (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net lossincome (loss) per share was calculated by dividing net lossincome (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the dilutive effects of options and restricted stock.  Due to the net loss in the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,February 25, 2017, and August 27, 2016, restricted shares in the amount of 112,353 and 140,551, respectively, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.  The computations of basic and diluted net lossincome (loss) per share attributable to the Company are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $(15,993) $(30,936)
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. $96,294
 $4,139
 $54,165
 $(49,807)
  
  
      
  
Basic weighted-average common shares 48,330
 48,249
 48,361
 48,286
 48,340
 48,285
Effect of dilutive securities:  
  
Restricted shares 
 
Dilutive potential common shares 48,330
 48,249
 48,476
 48,417
 48,460
 48,285
  
  
        
Net loss per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:  
  
Antidilutive securities excluded from computation of earnings per share

 
 
 
 145
      
  
Net income (loss) per common share attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.:      
  
Basic $(0.33) $(0.64) $1.99
 $0.09
 $1.12
 $(1.03)
Diluted $(0.33) $(0.64) $1.99
 $0.09
 $1.12
 $(1.03)

6.   Accrued Dividends Payable and Dividends per Common Share

We make an accrual of dividends payable at the end of each quarter according to the Company’s dividend policy adopted by its Board of Directors. The Company pays a dividend to shareholders of its Common Stock and Class A Common Stock on a quarterly basis for each quarter for which the Company reports net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of such quarterly income. Dividends are paid to shareholders of record as of the 60th day following the last day of such quarter, except for the fourth fiscal quarter.  For the fourth quarter, the Company pays dividends to shareholders of record on the 65th day after the quarter end. Dividends are payable on the 15th day following the record date. Following a quarter for which the Company does not report net income attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc., the Company will not pay a dividend for a subsequent profitable quarter until the Company is profitable on a cumulative basis computed from the date of the last quarter for which a dividend was paid. Therefore, the Company did not pay a dividend with respect to the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, or any quarter of fiscal 2017, and will not pay a dividend for the first, quartersecond, or third quarters of fiscal 2018. At September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, the cumulative losses that must be recovered prior to paying a dividend were $90.6$20.5 million. When applicable, the amount of the accrual appears on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Accrued dividends payable.”

7.   Fair Value Measurements

The Company is required to categorize both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy.  The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable, and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor.

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Index

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
Index

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

The disclosures of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at cost are as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term debt: The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is at its stated value.  We have not elected to carry our long-term debt at fair value.  Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, which are level 2 inputs. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s borrowings under its long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):
 September 2, 2017 June 3, 2017 March 3, 2018 June 3, 2017
 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value
5.4% – 6.2% Notes payable $8,125
 $8,161
 $9,250
 $9,295
 $5,875
 $5,855
 $9,250
 $9,295
Long-term leases 1,606
 1,445
 1,689
 1,520
 1,402
 1,228
 1,689
 1,520
 $9,731
 $9,606
 $10,939
 $10,815
 $7,277
 $7,083
 $10,939
 $10,815

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
໿
       Total       Total
September 2, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
March 3, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations 
 $20,872
 
 $20,872
 
 $18,888
 
 $18,888
Municipal bonds 
 29,100
 
 29,100
 
 21,165
 
 21,165
Corporate bonds 
 53,976
 
 53,976
 
 133,701
 
 133,701
Certificates of deposits`
 1,504
 
 1,504
Asset backed securities 
 3,080
 
 3,080
 
 2,012
 
 2,012
Mutual funds 2,509
 
 
 2,509
 3,008
 
 
 3,008
Total assets measured at fair value $2,509
 $107,028
 
 $109,537
 $3,008
 $177,270
 
 $180,278
໿
        Total
June 3, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Balance
Assets  
  
  
  
US government and agency obligations $
 $20,216
 $
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 
 36,873
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 
 75,790
 
 75,790
Asset backed securities 
 5,583
 
 5,583
Mutual funds 2,459
 
 
 2,459
Total assets measured at fair value $2,459
 $138,462
 $
 $140,921

Investment securities – available-for-sale, classified as level 2, consist of U.S. government and agency obligations, taxable and tax exempt municipal bonds, zero coupon municipal bonds, foreign government obligations, asset backed securities and corporate bonds with maturities of three months or longer when purchased. We classify these securities as current, because amounts invested are available for current operations. Observable inputs for these securities are yields, credit risks, default rates, and volatility.

໿
໿
Index

8.   Investment Securities

The following represents the Company’s investment securities as of September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 and June 3, 2017 (in thousands):
Index

September 2, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
March 3, 2018 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $20,906
 $
 $34
 $20,872
 $19,071
 $
 $183
 $18,888
Municipal bonds 29,069
 31
 
 29,100
 21,188
 
 23
 21,165
Corporate bonds 53,948
 28
 
 53,976
 134,704
 
 1,003
 133,701
Certificates of deposits 1,504
 
 
 1,504
Asset backed securities 3,081
 
 1
 3,080
 2,027
 
 15
 2,012
Total current investment securities $107,004
 $59
 $35
 $107,028
 $178,494
 $
 $1,224
 $177,270
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
 $2,023
 $985
 $
 $3,008
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,717
 $792
 $
 $2,509
 $2,023
 $985
 $
 $3,008
June 3, 2017 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Estimated Fair Value
US government and agency obligations $20,259
 $
 $43
 $20,216
Municipal bonds 36,839
 34
 
 36,873
Corporate bonds 75,769
 21
 
 75,790
Asset backed securities 5,583
 
 
 5,583
Total current investment securities $138,450
 $55
 $43
 $138,462
   
  
  
  
Mutual funds $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459
Total noncurrent investment securities $1,706
 $753
 $
 $2,459

Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities were $34.1$95.3 million and $92.8$228.3 million during the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017, and August 27, 2016, respectively. Gross realized gains during the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016 were $16,000$25,000 and $231,000, respectively.  Gross realized losses during the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016 were zero$5,000 and $6,000, respectively. For purposes of determining gross realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Unrealized holding gains and (losses), net of taxes, for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016 were as follows (in thousands):
 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Current investments $8
 $271
 $(975) $(30)
Noncurrent investments 24
 40
 311
 154
Total unrealized holding gains $32
 $311
Total unrealized holding gains (losses) $(664) $124

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.  Contractual maturities at September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, are as follows (in thousands):
 Estimated Fair Value Estimated Fair Value
Within one year  $73,204
 $95,140
1-5 years 33,824
 82,130
Total $107,028
 $177,270

໿
Index

9.   Equity

The following reflects the equity activity, including our noncontrolling interest, for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 (in thousands)thousands, except share amounts):
໿
 Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders     Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. Stockholders    
 Common Stock         Common Stock        
  
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling    
 Class A Treasury Paid In Accum. Other Retained Noncontrolling  
 Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Income Earnings Interest Total Amount
 Amount Amount Capital Comp. Loss Earnings Interest Total
Balance at June 3, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,914) $49,932
 $(128) $816,046
 $1,806
 $844,493
 $703
 $48
 $(23,914) $49,932
 $(128) $816,046
 $1,806
 $844,493
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 
 
 
 
 32
 
 
 32
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax 
 
 
 
 (664) 
 
 (664)
Grant of restricted stock 
 
 81
 (81) 
 
 
 
Forfeiture of restricted stock 
 
 (1) 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (6) 6
 
 
 
 
Buyback of 519 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (21) 
 
 
 
 (21)
Buyback of 25,575 shares to satisfy withholding obligation in connection with the vesting of restricted stock 
 
 (1,128) 
 
 
 
 (1,128)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest partners 
 
 
 
 
 
 279
 279
 
 
 
 
 
 
 279
 279
Restricted stock compensation 
 
 
 859
 
 
 
 859
 
 
 
 2,579
 
 
 
 2,579
Net loss 
 
 
 
 
 (15,993) (184) (16,177)
Balance at September 2, 2017 $703
 $48
 $(23,936) $50,792
 $(96) $800,053
 $1,901
 $829,465
Net income 
 
 
 
 
 54,165
 (65) 54,100
Balance at March 3, 2018 $703
 $48
 $(24,967) $52,436
 $(792) $870,211
 $2,020
 $899,659

10. Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”). The new tax legislation reduces the United States corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018.

Following the enactment of the Act, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which provides the Company up to a one-year measurement period, beginning on the Act’s enactment date, in which to complete the required analysis and accounting for the effects of the Act. The guidance allows the Company to record provisional adjustments related to the impacts of the Act when the accounting for the effects of the Act is incomplete, but when reasonable estimates can be made regarding the effects of the Act. Our accounting for the Act is not complete, because it required the Company to estimate the timing of settlement of the temporary differences from which our deferred taxes arose; however, we were able to make reasonable estimates, and we recorded those estimates as provisional adjustments as described in the paragraph below. The Company will complete the required analysis during its fourth quarter. If any adjustments to the provisional amounts are required, those adjustments will be recorded in the Company’s fourth quarter.

Pre-tax income, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $88.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended March 3, 2018, compared to pre-tax income, less net income attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $4.2 million for last year’s comparable period.  For the current thirteen-week period, income tax benefit of $8.3 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 31.8%, excluding the impact of any discrete items, compared to income tax expense of $34,000, with an effective rate of 0.8%, for last year’s comparable period. Results for the current thirteen-week period were favorably impacted by a $35 million discrete tax benefit related to the Act.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, pre-tax income, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $23.4 million, compared to pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $81.1 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, income tax benefit of $30.7 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 24.0%, excluding the impact of any discrete items, compared to an income tax benefit of $31.3 million, with an effective rate of 38.6% for last year's comparable period. Discrete items for current thirty-nine week period primarily related to a $35.0 million tax benefit in connection with the Act.

Index

The effective rate increase for the thirteen weeks ended March 3, 2018 was primarily related to the provision to return adjustments on the fiscal 2016 tax return recorded in the prior period.  The effective rate decrease for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 was primarily related to the change in the federal statutory rate from 35% to 21%, resulting from legislation that was enacted on December 22, 2017. The rate change is administratively effective at the beginning of our fiscal year, using a blended rate for the annual period. As a result, the blended statutory tax rate for the year is 29.13%.

At March 3, 2018, accounts payable included an income tax payable of $20.7 million compared to an income tax receivable of $52.7 million at June 3, 2017. Not included in income taxes payable of $20.7 million is the tax benefit from deduction of the $80.8 million legal settlement expense, which was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2018, but is not deductible for income tax purposes until paid.  As noted above, the legal settlement expense was paid by the Company on March 23, 2018, subsequent to the end of our third quarter. The Company will receive a tax deduction for the legal settlement expense in the fourth quarter.  The remainder of the change is primarily due to the second quarter fiscal 2018 receipt of a $45.0 million federal tax refund related to the carryback of fiscal 2017 losses.

Our effective rate differs from the federal statutory income tax rate due to state income taxes and certain items included in income for financial reporting purposes that are not included in taxable income for income tax purposes, including tax exempt interest income, the domestic manufacturers deduction, and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.  The enacted rate change from 35% to 21% also caused the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week effective rate to be significantly different from the Company’s historical annual effective rate.  The Company’s effective tax rate for future fiscal years under current legislation is expected to be 21% plus a state tax effected rate of approximately 3%.

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This report contains numerous forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) relating to our shell egg business, including estimated production data, expected operating schedules, projected construction costs, and other operating data, including anticipated results of operations and financial condition.  Such forward-looking statements are identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “hopes,” “may,” “should,” “plans,” “projected,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” or similar words.  Actual production, operating schedules, capital costs, results of operations, and other projections and estimates could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements are based on management’s current intent, belief, expectations, estimates, and projections regarding the Company and its industry.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and other factors that are difficult to predict and may be beyond our control.  The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, among others, (i) the risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017,, as updated by our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, (ii) the risks and hazards inherent in the shell egg business (including disease, pests, weather conditions, and potential for product recall), (iii) changes in the demand for and market prices of shell eggs and feed costs, (iv) our ability to predict and meet demand for cage-free and other specialty eggs, (v) risks, changes, or obligations that could result from our future acquisition of new flocks or businesses and risks or changes that may cause conditions to completing a pending acquisition not to be met, and (vi) adverse results in pending litigation matters.  In addition, we continue to assess the impact of the recently enacted federal tax reform legislation on our business and consolidated financial statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because, while we believe the assumptions on which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, there can be no assurance that these forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate.  Further, forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the respective dates thereof, or if no date is stated, as of the date hereof.  Except as otherwise required by law, we disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly these forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Index

OVERVIEW

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is primarily engaged in the production, grading, packaging, marketing, and distribution of fresh shell eggs.  Our fiscal year end is the Saturday closest to May 31.
 
Index

Our operations are fully integrated.  At our facilities we hatch chicks, grow and maintain flocks of pullets (young female chickens, under 18 weeks of age), layers (mature female chickens) and breeders (male and female birds used to produce fertile eggs to hatch for egg production flocks), manufacture feed, and produce, process, and distribute shell eggs. We are the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in the United States ("U.S.").  We market the majority of our shell eggs in the southwestern, southeastern, mid-western, and mid-Atlantic regions of the U.S.  We market shell eggs through an extensive distribution network to a diverse group of customers, including national and regional grocery store chains, club stores, foodservice distributors, and egg product consumers.    

The Company has one operating segment, which is the production, grading, packaging, marketing and distribution of shell eggs.  The majority of our customers rely on us to provide most of their shell egg needs, including specialty and non-specialty eggs. Specialty eggs represent a broad range of products.  We classify nutritionally enhanced, cage free, organic and brown eggs as specialty products for accounting and reporting purposes. We classify all other shell eggs as non-specialty products.  While we report separate sales information for these types of eggs, there are a number of cost factors which are not specifically available for non-specialty or specialty eggs due to the nature of egg production. We manage our operations and allocate resources to these types of eggs on a consolidated basis based on the demands of our customers.
 
Our operating results are directly tied to egg prices, which are highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations, and are outside of our control. For example, the annual average per dozen eggs of the Urner-Barry Southeastern Regional Large Egg Market Price per dozen eggs,("UB southeastern large index"), for our last ten fiscal years 2005-2017 ranged from a low of $0.72$0.85 in fiscal year 20052017 to a high of $2.97$1.79 in fiscal year 2016.  The shell egg industry has traditionally been subject to periods of high profitability followed by periods of significant loss. In the past, during periods of high profitability, shell egg producers tended to increase the number of layers in production with a resulting increase in the supply of shell eggs, which generally caused a drop in shell egg prices until supply and demand returned to balance.  As a result, our financial results from year to year may vary significantly.   Shorter term, retail sales of shell eggs historically have been greatest during the fall and winter months and lowest during the summer months.  Prices for shell eggs fluctuate in response to seasonal factors and a natural increase in shell egg production in the spring and early summer.  Shell egg prices tend to increase with the start of the school year and are highest prior to holiday periods, particularly Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter.  Consequently, we generally experience lower sales and net income in our first and fourth fiscal quarters ending in August and May, respectively. Because of the seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, comparisons of our sales and operating results between different quarters within a single fiscal year are not necessarily meaningful comparisons.  

In 2015, our industry experienced a significant avian influenza (“AI”) outbreak, primarily in the upper Midwestern U.S.  There were no positive tests for AI at any of our locations. Based on several published industry estimates, we believe approximately 12% of the national flock of laying hens was affected.  During April through June 2015, the affected laying hens were either destroyed by the disease or euthanized.  The USDA data showed the supply of laying hens decreased substantially. Since that time, hen numbers began to recoverhave recovered and eventually exceed pre-AIeven exceeded pre–AI levels byin late 2016. In February 2017, the USDA issued revised data that showed the size of the laying hen flock for calendar years 2015 and 2016 was meaningfully higher in both years than previously reported.

Egg prices increased significantly during the summer and fall of 2015. The average Urner-Barryof Thursday priceprices for the UB southeastern large market (i.e. conventional shell eggs) in the southeastern regionindex for the months of June through November 2015 was $2.32 per dozen, with a peak of $2.97 in August.  Subsequent to November 2015, shell egg prices declined.  The Urner Barry priceUB southeastern large index ("UB index") hit a decade-low level in both our fiscal 2016 fourth quarter and fiscal 2017 second quarter. During our fiscal 2018, first quarter,shell egg prices have rebounded due to strong demand illustrating the volatility of our industry. During the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, the UB southeastern large index averaged $0.94$1.37 per dozen, a 25.3%59.5% increase over the comparable period of the prior year period average of $0.75which averaged $0.86 per dozen. In spite of this increase, the index remained below historical levels. Subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2018 first quarter it has continued to increase.

Index

According to Nielsen data, retail customer demand for shell eggscalendar year 2017 and early 2018 has remained strong.been strong and exceeded normal seasonal trends, supported by increased egg promotions in grocery stores. After a period of sluggish demand from institutional food customers, this sector has seen increasing egg usage in recent months. The USDA reports that shell egg exportexports expanded in calendar 2017 and have recovered from previous low levels following the 2015 avian influenza (AI) outbreak. Export demand has improved sincealso increased as a result of the beginning of fiscal 2017; however, it has not fully recovered to levels prior to the AI outbreak. Additionally, the industry experienced reducedreported Fipronil contaminations across Europe and Southeast Asia. Together, these demand for egg products, as many commercial customers reformulated their products to use fewer eggs when prices spiked andtrends have been slow to resume previous egg usage. Togetherresulted in a more favorable market environment compared with the increased supply of hens, these factors created an oversupply of eggs, with pressure on
Index

market prices. Recently, increasing exports have returned to historical levels, although they remain below the peaks seen just prior to the AI outbreak, and USDA reports show the chick hatch has been trending down, suggesting there may be a moderation in the size ofyear ago despite the laying hen flock size increasing slighly over time.prior-year levels. Accordingly, our net average selling price for shell eggs for the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2018 was $1.017$1.545 compared with $0.952$1.130 for the corresponding period of fiscal 2017. While overall market conditions are more favorable than a year ago, we do not expect any sustained improvementHowever, recent USDA reports show an increase in pricing until we have a more stable supply and demand balance.chicks hatched which could indicate future increases in supply.

We are one of the largest producers and marketers of value-added specialty shell eggs in the U.S. They have been a significant and growing portion of the market in recent years. During our fiscal 2016 a number of large restaurant chains, food service companies and grocery chains, including our largest customers, announced goals to transition to a cage-free egg supply chain by specified future dates. We are working with our customers to achieve smooth progress in meeting their goals. Our focus for future expansion at our farms will be environments that are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be converted to cage-free, based on a timeline to meet our customer’s needs.

For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, we produced approximately 86%81% of the total number of shell eggs we sold compared to 82%84% in the comparable prior year period.  We produced 7.4% more0.6% less dozens during the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 than in the corresponding period of last year. For the thirteen weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017, approximately 9% of such production was provided by contract producers who utilize their facilities in the production of shell eggs by layers owned by us compared to 5% for the same period of last year. This increase represents contract production acquired with our fiscal 2017 acquisitions.us. We own the shell eggs produced under these arrangements.

Our cost of production is materially affected by feed costs.  Feed costs averaged approximately 55%57% and 58% of our total farm egg production cost for the thirteen weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017, compared to 60% for the same period of fiscal 2017.respectively. Changes in market prices for corn and soybean meal, the primary ingredients in the feed we use, result in changes in our cost of goods sold.   The cost of feed ingredients, which are commodities, are subject to factors over which we have little or no control such as volatile price changes caused by weather, size of harvest, transportation and storage costs, demand, and the agricultural and energy policies of the U.S. and foreign governments.  We anticipate significantLarge U.S. corn and soybean crops were harvested in 2017, which combined with the large 2016 crops should provide an adequate supply of our primary feed ingredients induring the remainder of fiscal 2018. 

WhileOn December 22, 2017, the recent hurricanes that hitPresident of the United States followingsigned into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”). The new tax legislation reduces the United States corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. As a result, the Company recognized an income tax benefit for the period related to the remeasurement of the Company’s net deferred tax liability. The Company remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. The Company has not completed the accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the Act; however, the Company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on existing deferred balances. The provisional amount recorded related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax balance was $35 million, which is included as a component of income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations.

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. The agreement was finalized and effective January 30, 2018. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company settled the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $54.8 million net of tax, or $1.13 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, in the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company paid the settlement on March 23, 2018, subsequent to the end of our first fiscal quarter of 2018 caused disruptions to our operations in Texas, Florida and Georgia, we did not sustain any material loss of egg production.third quarter.

Index

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain items from our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations expressed as a percentage of net sales.

  13 Weeks Ended
  September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 93.4 % 104.0 %
Gross profit (loss) 6.6 % (4.0)%
Selling, general, and administrative expense 15.9 % 16.8 %
Operating loss (9.3)% (20.8)%
Other income (expense), net (0.1)% 0.8 %
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest (9.4)% (20.0)%
Income tax benefit 3.2 % 7.3 %
Net loss before noncontrolling interest (12.6)% (27.3)%
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest (0.1)%  %
Net loss attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (12.5)% (27.3)%
Index

  13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
  March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Net sales 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
Cost of sales 72.4 % 87.2 % 79.3 % 95.8 %
Gross profit 27.6 % 12.8 % 20.7 % 4.2 %
Selling, general, and administrative expense 10.1 % 14.3 % 12.1 % 15.7 %
Legal settlement expense  %  % 7.6 %  %
(Gain) Loss on disposal of fixed assets (0.1)% 0.2 %  % 0.2 %
Operating income (loss) 17.6 % (1.7)% 1.0 % (11.7)%
Other income, net 2.7 % 3.1 % 1.1 % 1.6 %
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest 20.3 % 1.4 % 2.1 % (10.1)%
Income tax (benefit) expense (1.9)%  % (2.9)% (3.9)%
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interest 22.2 % 1.4 % 5.0 % (6.2)%
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  %  %  %  %
Net income (loss) attributable to Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. 22.2 % 1.4 % 5.0 % (6.2)%

NET SALES

Net sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 were $262.8$435.8 million, an increase of $23.0$129.3 million, or 9.6%42.2%, compared to net sales of $239.8$306.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2016.February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in egg selling prices and, to a lesser extent, an increase in dozens sold.

Shell egg sales made up approximately 98%97.2% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017.March 3, 2018.  Dozens sold for the firstthird quarter of fiscal year 2018 were 249.4up 9.6 million to 273.2 million, a 2.9%3.6% increase from 242.3263.6 million dozen for the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2017. The volume increase accounted for a $6.8$10.8 million increase in net sales. 

Net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.017$1.545 for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, compared to $0.952$1.130 for the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2016.February 25, 2017. The 6.8%36.7% increase in average selling price accounted for a $15.7$113.4 million increase in net sales.  Net average selling price is the blended price for all sizes and grades of shell eggs, including non-graded shell egg sales, breaking stock, and undergrades.    

Egg products and other revenues accounted for 2%2.8% of net sales for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018. These revenues were $6.1$12.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, compared to $5.6$6.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2016.February 25, 2017.

Net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 were $1,059.8 million, an increase of $259.9 million, or 32.5%, compared to net sales of $799.9 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017. The increase was primarily due to an increase in egg selling prices and, to a lesser extent, an increase in dozens sold.

Shell egg sales made up approximately 97.3% of net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018.  Dozens sold for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 were 785.8 million, a 3.6% increase from 758.1 million dozen for the same period of fiscal 2017. The volume increase accounted for a $28.2 million increase in net sales. 

Net average selling price per dozen of shell eggs was $1.303 for the thirty-nine weeks endedMarch 3, 2018, compared to $1.020 for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017. The 27.7% increase in average selling price accounted for a $222.4 million increase in net sales.     

Index

Egg products accounted for 2.7% of net sales for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018. These revenues were $29.1 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, compared to $18.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017.

The table below represents an analysis of our non-specialty and specialty shell egg sales (in thousands, except percentage data).  Following the table is a discussion of the information presented in the table.
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017
Total net sales $262,845
   $239,845
   $435,820
   $306,540
   $1,059,837
   $799,929
  
                        
Non-specialty shell egg $146,048
 56.9% $113,504
 48.4% $286,994
 67.7% $166,893
 55.6% $662,017
 64.2% $403,404
 51.6%
Specialty shell egg 101,697
 39.6% 109,312
 46.7% 128,079
 30.2% 122,337
 40.8% 343,069
 33.3% 344,873
 44.1%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 6,080
 2.4% 8,455
 3.6% 6,956
 1.7% 8,522
 2.8% 18,875
 1.8% 25,492
 3.3%
Other 2,884
 1.1% 2,997
 1.3% 1,697
 0.4% 2,346
 0.8% 6,792
 0.7% 7,828
 1.0%
Net shell egg sales $256,709
 100.0% $234,268
 100.0% $423,726
 100.0% $300,098
 100.0% $1,030,753
 100.0% $781,597
 100.0%
                        
Net shell egg sales as a percent of total net sales 98%   98%   97.2%   97.9%   97.3%   97.7%  
                        
Dozens sold:                        
Non-specialty shell egg 192,168
 77.0% 182,730
 75.4% 203,444
 74.4% 196,998
 74.7% 596,061
 75.9% 571,111
 75.3%
Specialty shell egg 54,138
 21.7% 55,399
 22.9% 66,260
 24.3% 62,265
 23.6% 179,941
 22.9% 174,204
 23.0%
Co-pack specialty shell egg 3,158
 1.3% 4,196
 1.7% 3,505
 1.3% 4,350
 1.7% 9,756
 1.2% 12,799
 1.7%
Total dozens sold 249,464
 100.0% 242,325
 100.0% 273,209
 100.0% 263,613
 100.0% 785,758
 100.0% 758,114
 100.0%
                        
Net average selling price per dozen:                        
Non-specialty shell eggs $0.760
   $0.621
   $1.411
   $0.847
   $1.111
   $0.706
  
Specialty shell eggs $1.878
   $1.973
   $1.933
   $1.965
   $1.907
   $1.980
  
All shell eggs $1.017
   $0.952
   $1.545
   $1.130
   $1.303
   $1.020
  

Non-specialty shell eggs include all shell egg sales not specifically identified as specialty or co-pack specialty shell egg sales.   This market is characterized generally by an inelasticity of demand. Small increases or decreases in production or demand can have a large positive or adverse effect on selling prices.  For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold increased 3.3%, and the average selling price increased 66.6% to $1.411 from $0.847 for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, non-specialty shell egg dozens sold increased approximately 5.2%4.4%, and the average selling price increased 22.4%57.4% to $0.760$1.111 from $0.621$0.706 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

Index

Specialty shell eggs, which include nutritionally enhanced, cage-free, organic, and brown eggs continue to make up a large portion of our total shell egg revenue and dozens sold.  Specialty egg retail prices are less cyclical than non-specialty shell egg prices and are generally higher due to consumer willingness to pay for the perceived benefits from these products.  This was particularly evident in recent quarters prior to our first quarter of fiscal 2018 as non-specialty egg prices declined more than specialty egg prices.  However, asAs non-specialty egg prices declined, we experienced some margin and volume pressures on specialty egg sales.  For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, specialty shell egg dozens sold decreased 2.3%increased 6.4%, andbut the average selling price decreased 4.8%1.6% to $1.878$1.933 from $1.973$1.965 for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, specialty shell egg dozens sold increased 3.3%, but the average selling price decreased 3.7% to $1.907 from $1.980 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

Co-pack specialty shell eggs are sold primarily through co-pack arrangements, a common practice in the industry whereby production and processing of certain products is outsourced to another producer.  Shell egg sales in this category represented 1.3% and 1.7% dozen for the quarters ended September 2, 2017 and August 27, 2016.  Co-pack specialty shell eggs sold during the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2,March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017 and August 27, 2016, were 3.29.8 million and 4.212.8 million, which represented 1.2% and 1.7% of total dozens sold for those periods, respectively.
Index


The shell egg sales classified as “Other” represent sales of hard cooked eggs, hatching eggs, and other miscellaneous products, which are included with our shell egg operations. 

Egg products are shell eggs that are broken and sold in liquid, frozen, or dried form.  Our egg products are sold through our consolidated subsidiaries American Egg Products, LLC (“AEP”) and Texas Egg Products, LLC (“TEP”). 

For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, third quarter of fiscal 2018, egg product sales were $6.1$12.1 million, an increase of $559,000,$5.7 million, or 10.0%87.8%, compared to $5.6$6.4 million for the same period of 2017. Pounds sold for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017thirdquarter of fiscal2018 were 15.5 million, an increasea decrease of 1.1 million, or 7.9%6.9%, compared to 14.416.7 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The selling price per pound for the thirdquarter of fiscal2018 was $0.782 compared to $0.391 for the same period of fiscal 2017, a 99.4% increase.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, egg product sales were $29.1 million, an increase of $10.8 million, or 58.7%, compared to $18.3 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. Pounds sold for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 were 45.4 million, a decrease of 2.2 million, or 4.6%, compared to 47.6 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The selling price per pound for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 was $0.644 compared to $0.391 for the same period of fiscal 2017, a 64.1% increase.

COST OF SALES

Cost of sales consists of costs directly related to production, processing and packing of shell eggs, purchases of shell eggs from outside producers, processing and packing of liquid and frozen egg products, and other non-egg costs.  Farm production costs are those costs incurred at the egg production facility, including feed, facility, hen amortization, and other related farm production costs.

Index

The following table presents the key variables affecting cost of sales (in thousands, except cost per dozen data).
໿
໿
໿
໿
 13 Weeks Ended 13 Weeks Ended 39 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 Percent Change March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 Percent Change March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 Percent Change
Cost of Sales:                  
Farm production 144,289
 142,871
 1.0 % $152,242
 $151,478
 0.5 % $448,416
 $438,929
 2.2 %
Processing, packaging, and warehouse 51,111
 46,302
 10.4 % 55,525
 53,038
 4.7 % 160,344
 147,329
 8.8 %
Egg purchases and other (including change in inventory) 43,780
 55,593
 (21.2)% 97,778
 57,806
 69.1 % 205,849
 165,833
 24.1 %
Total shell eggs 239,180
 244,766
 (2.3)% 305,545
 262,322
 16.5 % 814,609
 752,091
 8.3 %
Egg products 6,044
 4,299
 40.6 % 10,041
 4,959
 102.5 % 24,808
 13,691
 81.2 %
Other 285
 349
 (18.3)% 136
 94
 44.7 % 590
 603
 (2.2)%
Total $245,509
 $249,414
 (1.6)% $315,722
 $267,375
 18.1 % $840,007
 $766,385
 9.6 %
                  
                  
Farm production cost (per dozen produced)                  
Feed $0.375
 $0.431
 (13.0)% $0.396
 $0.396
  % $0.387
 $0.406
 (4.7)%
Other $0.306
 $0.294
 4.1 % $0.297
 $0.290
 2.4 % $0.300
 $0.293
 2.4 %
Total $0.681
 $0.725
 (6.1)% $0.693
 $0.686
 1.0 % $0.687
 $0.699
 (1.7)%
                  
Outside egg purchases (average cost per dozen) $0.98
 $1.03
 (4.9)% $1.60
 $1.10
 45.5 % $1.35
 $1.04
 29.8 %
                  
Dozen produced 213,570
 198,782
 7.4 % 221,119
 222,492
 (0.6)% 657,577
 633,246
 3.8 %
Dozen sold 249,464
 242,325
 2.9 % 273,209
 263,613
 3.6 % 785,758
 758,114
 3.6 %

Index

Cost of sales for the firstthirdquarter of fiscal2018 was $315.7 million, an increase of $48.3 million, or 18.1%, from $267.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2017. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in the cost of eggs purchased for the quarter. Feed cost per dozen was$0.396 for the thirdquarter of both fiscal2018 and 2017. Other farm production cost increased 2.4% to $0.297 for the thirdquarter of fiscal2018 compared to $0.290 for the same period of last year.

Cost of sales for the thirty-nine weeks endedMarch 3, 2018 was $245.5$840.0 million, a decreasean increase of $3.9$73.6 million, or 1.6%9.6%, from $249.4$766.4 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The decreaseincrease was primarily driven by a decreasean increase in the volume and cost of egg purchaseseggs purchased in 2018, including the freight cost for delivery of those eggs, and, to a lesser extent, an increase in dozens produced during the period. Dozens produced increased 7.4%3.8% resulting in higher farm production, processing, and packaging costs. These increases were offset by a lower feed cost per dozen produced. Feed cost per dozen for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, was $0.375,$0.387, compared to $0.431$0.406 per dozen for the comparable period of fiscal 2017, a decrease of 13.0%4.7%, resulting in a decrease in cost of sales of approximately $12.0 million for the comparable period. Other farm production cost increased 4.1%2.4% to $0.306$0.300 for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, compared to $0.294$0.293 for the same period of last year primarily due to increased layer hen amortization expense and facility costs related to capital improvement and conversion projects.

Gross profit for the third quarter of fiscal 2018 was $120.1 million compared to $39.2 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2017. For the thirty-nine weeks ended ended March 3, 2018, gross profit increased to $17.3$219.8 million from $33.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017, compared to a loss of $9.6 million  for the first quartersame period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to the increased average customer selling prices and sales volumes. 
 

SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Selling, general, and administrative expenses include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting, and corporate overhead.  The following table presents an analysis of our selling, general, and administrative expenses (in thousands).

 13 Weeks Ended
 Actual 
Less: Acquisitions*
 Net       13 Weeks Ended
 September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 September 2, 2017 August 27, 2016 $ Change % Change March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $11,734
 $337
 $11,397
 $13,057
 $(1,660) (12.7)% $13,848
 $15,329
 $(1,481) (9.7)%
Delivery expense 13,124
 1,016
 12,108
 12,560
 (452) (3.6)% 13,443
 13,875
 (432) (3.1)%
Payroll and overhead 9,496
 724
 8,772
 8,438
 334
 4.0 % 9,425
 6,783
 2,642
 39.0 %
Stock compensation expense 859
 
 859
 848
 11
 1.3 % 841
 823
 18
 2.2 %
Other expenses 6,497
 1,273
 5,224
 5,353
 (129) (2.4)% 6,618
 6,928
 (310) (4.5)%
Total $41,710
 $3,350
 $38,360
 $40,256
 $(1,896) (4.7)% $44,175
 $43,738
 $437
 1.0 %
            
*Represents amounts in the first quarter of fiscal 2018 related to our fiscal 2017 acquisitions, Foodonics International, Inc, and Happy Hen Egg Farms, Inc., which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017.


໿
For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, selling, general, and administrative expenses was $41.7$44.2 million an increase of $1.4 million, or 3.5%, compared to $40.3$43.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended August 27, 2016. The impact of the fiscal 2017 acquisitions, which were completed after the first quarter of fiscal 2017, was a $3.4 million increase to SG&A in the first quarter of 2018.

Excluding the impact of these acquisitions, specialtyFebruary 25, 2017. Specialty egg expense decreased $1.7$1.5 million, or 12.7%9.7%, compared to the same period of last year. Specialty egg expense typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which decreased 2.3%increased 6.4% for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017 compared to the same period of last year. AdvertisingMarch 3, 2018; however, this was more than offset by reduced advertising expense, which is a component of specialty egg expense for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017and decreased 19.5% from75.9% compared to the same period of fiscal 2017.2017 due to increased reimbursements of promotional expenses and reduced current year promotions. Payroll and overhead increased $334,000,$2.6 million, or 4.0%39.0%, compared to the same period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to reduced prior year bonus accruals. Other expenses decreased 4.5% to $6.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended March 3, 2018 from $6.9 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2017 bonus accruals being adjustedprimarily due to actual payments which were madereduced legal expense partially offset by increased automobile liability claims in the first quartercurrent period.

Index

  39 Weeks Ended
  March 3, 2018 February 25, 2017 $ Change % Change
Specialty egg expense $37,422
 $42,158
 $(4,736) (11.2)%
Delivery expense 39,680
 39,570
 110
 0.3 %
Payroll and overhead 27,168
 23,945
 3,223
 13.5 %
Stock compensation expense 2,579
 2,480
 99
 4.0 %
Other expenses 21,196
 17,832
 3,364
 18.9 %
Total $128,045
 $125,985
 $2,049
 1.6 %

໿
For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, selling, general, and administrative expenses was $128.0 million, an increase of fiscal 2018. Delivery$2.0 million, or 1.6%, compared to $126.0 million for the thirty-nine weeks endedFebruary 25, 2017. Specialty egg expense decreased $452,000$4.7 million, or 3.6%11.2%, compared to the same period of last year. Specialty egg expense typically fluctuates with specialty egg dozens sold, which increased 3.3% for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018; however, this was more than offset by reduced advertising expense, which is a component of specialty egg expense and decreased 72.8% compared to the same period for fiscal 2017 due to refunded promotional allowances and reduced current year promotions. Payroll and overhead increased $3.2 million, or 13.5%, compared to the same period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to a decrease in contract trucking cost.reduced prior year bonus accruals. Other expenses increased 18.9% to $21.2 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 from $17.8 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2017 primarily due to increased insurance, amortization of intangible assets, bad debt, and professional fees.

LEGAL SETTLEMENT EXPENSE

On December 29, 2017, the Company reached an agreement on material terms of the settlement of several large direct action purchasers' antitrust claims against the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company settled the claims with a single $80.8 million payment, which is $54.8 million net of tax, or $1.13 per basic and diluted share. As a result, the Company has recorded the legal settlement expense and offsetting liability to operating expense and current liabilities, respectively, during the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018. The agreement was effective January 30, 2018. The Company paid the settlement on March 23, 2018, subsequent to the end of our fiscal 2018 third quarter.

(GAIN) LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF FIXED ASSETS

InDuring the first quarter of fiscalthirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017 we recorded a $525,000$1.4 million loss on disposal of fixed assets due to a roof replacement at one of our Texas locations.locations and the replacement of equipment at our Utah location to comply with California regulations.

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

As a result of the above, operating lossincome was $24.4$76.2 million for the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2018, compared to $50.4a loss of $5.2 million for the fiscal 2017 firstthird quarter. 

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, we recorded an operating income of $11.4 million compared to a loss of $93.8 million for the same period of fiscal 2017.

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)    

Total other income (expense) consists of items not directly charged to, or related to, operations such as interest income and expense, royalty income, equity in income or loss of affiliates, and patronage income, among other items.  

Index

For the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2018, we recorded $504,000$1.1 million of interest income compared to $1.1 million$587,000 for the same period of last year.   The decreaseincrease resulted primarily from lowerhigher average invested balances.balances and higher rates earned. The Company recorded interest expense of $146,000$112,000 and $387,000,$386,000, of which $116,000$8,000 and $379,000$210,000 was capitalized, in the firstthird quarters of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively.  These changesThe $274,000 reduction in interest expense resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt and capitalizing less interest due to a reduction in major expansion and renovation projects.

Index
debt.

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates for the firstthird quarter of fiscal 2018 was a lossincome of $353,000$2.4 million compared to income of $191,000$1.0 million for the same period of last year.  The decreaseincrease of $544,000$1.4 million is primarily due to lossesimproved results at our Red River joint venture.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, we recorded $2.2 million of interest income compared to $2.5 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The decrease resulted primarily from lower average invested balances partially offset by higher rates earned during the period. The Company recorded interest expense of $387,000 and $1.1 million, of which $214,000 and $959,000 was capitalized, for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 and February 25, 2017, respectively. The $755,000 reduction in interest expense resulted from the Company reducing outstanding debt.

Patronage dividends, which represent distributions from our membership in Eggland's Best, Inc., increased $678,000 from $7.6 million in fiscal 2017 to $8.3 million in fiscal 2018.

Equity in income (loss) of affiliates for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 was a income of $2.3 million compared to income of $1.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. The increase of $448,000 is primarily due to improved results at our Red River joint venture.

Other, net for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, was a loss of $538,000$1.3 million compared with income of $122,000to $156,000 for the same period of last year, a decrease of $660,000,fiscal 2017, primarily driven by a reduction in miscellaneous income and an increase in uninsured losses in the current period.income.

INCOME TAXES

As previously discussed in the Overview of MD&A, the Tax Cuts ands Jobs Act of 2017 favorably impacted our third quarter results. The new tax legislation reduces the United States corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

Following the enactment of the Act, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which provides the Company up to a one-year measurement period, beginning on the Act’s enactment date, in which to complete the required analysis and accounting for the effects of the Act. The guidance allows the Company to record provisional adjustments related to the impacts of the Act when the accounting for the effects of the Act is incomplete, but when reasonable estimates can be made regarding the effects of the Act. Our accounting for the Act is not complete, because it required the Company to estimate the timing of settlement of the temporary differences from which our deferred taxes arose; however, we were able to make reasonable estimates, and we recorded those estimates as provisional adjustments as described in the paragraph below. The Company will complete the required analysis during its fourth quarter. If any adjustments to the provisional amounts are required, those adjustments will be recorded in the Company’s fourth quarter.

Pre-tax loss,income, less net lossincome attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $24.3$88.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, compared to pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $48.5$4.2 million for last year’s comparable period.  For the current thirteen-week period, an income tax benefit of $8.3 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 34.3%31.8%, excluding the impact of any discrete items, compared to an income tax expense of $34,000, with an effective rate of 0.8%, for last year’s comparable period. Results for the current thirteen week period were favorably impacted by a $35 million discrete tax benefit related to the Act.

Index

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, pre-tax income, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, was $23.4 million, compared to pre-tax loss, less net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest, of $81.1 million for the same period of fiscal 2017. For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 income tax benefit of $30.7 million was recorded, with an effective tax rate of 24.0%, excluding the impact of any discrete items, compared to an income tax benefit of $17.6$31.3 million, with an effective rate of 36.2%,38.6% for last year’syear's comparable period. Discrete items for the current thirty-nine weeks ended week period primarily related to a $35 million tax benefit in connection with the Act.

The effective rate increase for the thirteen weeks ended March 3, 2018 was primarily related to the provision to return adjustments on the fiscal 2016 tax return recorded in the prior period.  The effective rate decrease for the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 was primarily related to the projected carryback of net operating losses, as the carryback reduced prior year taxable income and the benefit of domestic manufacturers deductions, a portion of which was therefore reversedchange in the currentfederal statutory rate from 35% to 21%, resulting from legislation that was enacted on December 22, 2017. The rate change is administratively effective at the beginning of our fiscal year, using a blended rate for the annual period. As a result, the blended statutory tax rate for the year is 29.13%.

At September 2, 2017, the Company had recordedMarch 3, 2018, accounts payable included an income tax payable of $20.7 million compared to an income tax receivable of $56.0 million, an increase of $3.3 million, compared to $52.7 million at June 3, 2017. This increaseNot included in income taxes payable of $20.7 million is the tax benefit from deduction of the $80.8 million legal settlement expense, which was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2018, but is not deductible for income tax purposes until paid.  As noted above, the legal settlement expense was paid by the Company on March 23, 2018, subsequent to the end of our third quarter. The Company will receive a tax deduction for the legal settlement expense in the fourth quarter.  The remainder of the change is primarily due to incomethe second quarter fiscal 2018 receipt of a $45.0 million federal tax benefit recorded on net losses forrefund related to the carryback of fiscal year 2018.2017 losses.

Our effective rate differs from the federal statutory income tax rate of 35% due to state income taxes and certain items included in income for financial reporting purposes that are not included in taxable income for income tax purposes, including tax exempt interest income, the domestic manufacturers deduction, and net income or loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.  The enacted rate change from 35% to 21% also caused the thirteen-week and thirty-nine week effective rate to be significantly different from the Company’s historical annual effective rate.  The Company’s effective tax rate for future fiscal years under current legislation is expected to be 21% plus a state tax effected rate of approximately 3%.

NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTEREST

For the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $64,000 compared to a loss of $8,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017.

For the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018, net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest was $184,000$65,000 compared to $44,000$9,000 for the same period of fiscal 2017. This is attributable to income and losses from the Company's consolidated joint ventures.

NET LOSSINCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.

Net lossincome for the thirteen weeks ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 was $16.0$96.3 million, or $0.33$1.99 per basic and diluted share, compared $30.9to $4.1 million, or $0.64$0.09 per basic and diluted share for the same period last year.

Net income for the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 was $54.2 million, or $1.12 per basic and diluted share, compared to a loss of $49.8 million, or $1.03 per basic and diluted share, for the same period of fiscal 2017.

Index

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Our working capital at September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 was $357.5$391.8 million, compared to $371.5 million at June 3, 2017. The calculation of working capital is defined as current assets less current liabilities. Our current ratio was 6.673.17 at September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, compared with 6.74 at June 3, 2017. The decrease was due primarily to net lossesthe accrual of the legal settlement expense and higher accounts payable balances at period end due to the increase in recent periods, along with the usecost of cash for capital expenditures.purchased eggs. We have $4.2 million in outstanding standby letters of credit, which are collateralized by cash for the benefit of certain insurance companies. Our long-term debt at September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, including current maturities, amounted to $9.7$7.3 million, compared to $10.9 million at June 3, 2017. Refer to Note 9 of our June 3, 2017 audited financial statements for further information on our long-term debt.
  
For the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017, $21.5March 3, 2018, $146.1 million in net cash was used inprovided by operating activities, a decreasean improvement of $24.0$203.3 million, compared to net cash used in operations of $45.4$57.2 million for the comparable period in fiscal 2017.   Improved gross profit margins primarily resulting from higher sales volumes and egg selling prices as well as increased accounts payable at March 3, 2018 contributed to our increase in cash flow from operations.

Index

For the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, approximately $34.1$95.3 million was provided from the sale of short-term investments compared to $228.3 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended February 25, 2017. We used $136.9 million and we used $2.7$25.9 million for purchases of short-term investments compared to $92.8 million in salesfor the thirty-nine weeks ended March 3, 2018 and $9.0 million in purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2017.  February 25, 2017, respectively.
We invested an additional $1.2$4.1 million in our Red River Valley Egg Farm, LLC joint venture (“Red River JV”) compared to $5.5$17.7 million for the first quarterthree quarters of fiscal 2017.  Approximately $6.5$13.6 million was used to purchase property, plant and equipment including construction projects discussed in detail below, compared to $23.9$54.9 million in the thirteenthirty-nine weeks ended August 27, 2016.February 25, 2017.  This decrease represents the completion of several major expansion projects over the past twelve months. In fiscal 2017 we used $68.6 million for the acquisition of Foodonics International, Inc.

As of September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, cash increased approximately $1.4$88.6 million since June 3, 2017 compared to an increase of $8.6$2.9 million during the same period of fiscal 2017.

To accommodateOver the previously discussed increasepast five fiscal years the Company has completed over $300 million in customers committingcapital expenditures. The Company continues to undertake expansion projects as needed to meet customer demand for cage-free eggs over time, we expect that future expansions at our farms will be with environments thateggs. At March 3, 2018, there are cage-free or with equipment that can easily be converted to cage-free, based on a timeline that meets our customer’s needs.  The following table representsnot any material construction projects approved as of September 28, 2017 (in thousands):underway.
໿

໿
Project Location Projected Completion Projected Cost Incurred as of September 2, 2017 Remaining Projected Cost
Cage-Free Layer Houses Lake City, FL September 2017 $8,669
 $8,614
 $55
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer House with Pullets South Texas September 2017 11,641
 11,626
 15
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses Green Forest, AR October 2017 8,991
 8,753
 238
Cage-Free Layer Houses South Texas November 2017 4,063
 3,904
 159
Convertible/Cage-Free Layer Houses with Pullets Guthrie, KY January 2018 13,252
 12,194
 1,058
      $46,616
 $45,091
 $1,525

In addition to these projects, theThe Company expects to continue to fund its 50% share of the Red River JV.  As of September 28, 2017,March 20, 2018, we have contributed $55.6$58.0 million to the joint venture to fund our share of construction, startup costs, and operating losses. At March 3, 2018, the farm is in full production. We estimate we will make additional contributions of approximately $7$2 million to fund our share of the remaining construction costs.costs, which are primarily related to the construction of a feed mill.

Property, plant, and equipment at certain of our locations is pledged as collateral on our notes payable and senior secured notes.  Unless otherwise approved by our lenders, we are required by provisions of our loan agreements to (1) maintain minimum levels of working capital (current ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1) and net worth (minimum of $90.0 million tangible net worth, plus 45% of cumulative net income since the fiscal year ended May 28, 2005); (2) limit dividends paid in any given quarter to not exceed an amount equal to one third of the previous quarter’s consolidated net income (allowed if no events of default); (3) maintain minimum total funded debt to total capitalization (not to exceed 55%); and (4) maintain various cash-flow coverage ratios (1.25 to 1), among other restrictions. At September 2, 2017,March 3, 2018, we were in compliance with the financial covenant requirements of all loan agreements. Under certain of the loan agreements, the lenders have the option to require the prepayment of any outstanding borrowings in the event we undergo a change in control, as defined in the applicable loan agreement. Our debt agreements require Fred R. Adams, Jr., our Founder and Chairman Emeritus, or his family, to maintain ownership of Company shares representing not less than 50% of the outstanding voting power of the Company.    

Index

We believe our current cash balances, investments, and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our current and projected capital needs for at least the next twelve months.

Index

IMPACT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2014-09). The standard provides companies with a single model for use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific revenue guidance. The core principle of the model is to recognize revenue when control of the goods or services transfers to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services.  In August 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 until annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The guidance permits companies to either apply the requirements retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or apply the requirements in the year of adoption, through a cumulative adjustment. To date the Company’s assessments efforts include evaluation of certain revenue contracts with customers and the method of retrospective application, either full or modified.  We currently expect to utilize the full retrospective transition on date of adoption.  Based on the findings to date, the Company does not  expect ASU 2014-09 to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position; however, the Company’s assessment is not complete.  The Company plans to complete its review and method of adoption in fiscal 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases.  The purpose of the standard is to improve transparency and comparability related to the accounting and reporting of leasing arrangements.  The guidance will require balance sheet recognition for assets and liabilities associated with rights and obligations created by leases with terms greater than twelve months.  ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods.  Early adoption is permitted.  Based on the findings to date, the Company does not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position; however, the Company's assessment is not complete.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which removes step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As a result, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units' fair value. The guidance is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, our fiscal 2021. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017, and the prospective transition method should be applied. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income, which allows for reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. ASU 2018-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. Based on the findings to date, the Company does not expect ASU 20186-02 to have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position; however, the Company's assessment is not complete.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES    

We suggest our Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017, be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. There have been no changes to critical accounting policies identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2017.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Index


There have been no material changes in the market risk reported in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017.


ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, together with other financial officers, such officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 2, 2017March 3, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
           
Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our AnnualQuarterly Report on Form 10-K10-Q for the yearperiods ended June 3,December 2, 2017 and September 2, 2017, under Part I,II, Item 3:1:  Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following: 
Litigation

Refer to the discussion of certain legal proceedings involving the Company and/or its subsidiaries in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2017, under Part I Item 3: Legal Proceedings, and Part II Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 12: Contingencies, which discussions are incorporated herein by reference, as well as the following: 

Egg Antitrust Litigation

SinceOn September 25, 2008, the Company has beenwas named as one of several defendants in numerous antitrust cases involving the United States shell egg industry. The cases were consolidated into In somere: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the “District Court”), in three (3) groups of cases - the “Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action”, the “Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action” and the “Non-Class Cases.”

The Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action. The named plaintiffs in these cases the named plaintiffs allegealleged that they purchased eggs or egg products directly from a defendant and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claimclaimed to be similarly situated.  In other cases,As previously reported, in November 2014, the District Court approved the Company’s settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class and entered final judgment dismissing with prejudice the class members’ claims against the Company.

The Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action.  The named plaintiffs allege that they purchased shell eggs and egg products directly from one or more of the defendants but sue only for their own alleged damages and not on behalf of a putative class.  In the remainingin these cases the named plaintiffs are individuals or companies who allege that they purchased shell eggs indirectly from one or more of the defendants - that is, they purchased from retailers that had previously purchased from defendants or other parties - and have sued on behalf of themselves and a putative class of others who claim to be similarly situated.

The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated all of the putative class actions (as well as certain other cases in which the Company was not a named defendant) for pretrial proceedings in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania court organized the putative class actions around two groups (direct purchasers and indirect purchasers) and named interim lead counsel for the named plaintiffs in each group.


The Direct Purchaser Putative Class Action. The direct purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. As previously reported, in November 2014, the Court approved the Company’s settlement with the direct purchaser plaintiff class and entered final judgment dismissing with prejudice the class members’ claims against the Company.

The Indirect Purchaser Putative Class Action.  The indirect purchaser putative class cases were consolidated into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  On April 20-21, 2015, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motionplaintiffs filed two (2) motions for class certification. On September 18, 2015, the Court denied the indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for classcertification, one of which sought certification of 21 separate classes seeking damages under the laws of 21 states holding that the plaintiffs were not able to prove that their purported method for ascertaining class membership was reliable or administratively feasible, that common questions would predominate, or that their proposed class approach would be manageable in a single trial.  In addition to barring any right to pursue a class monetary remedy under state law, the Court also denied indirect purchaser plaintiffs’ request forand another which sought certification of an injunctive-relief class under federal law. However,law, and the court allowedDistrict Court

denied both of these motions. After each ruling, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs to renew their motion for class certification seeking a federal injunction. The plaintiffs filed their renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class on October 23, 2015. The Company joined the other defendants in opposing that motion on November 20.  The plaintiffs filed their reply memorandum on December 11, 2015, and on March 7, 2017, the Court heard arguments on the renewed motion for injunctive class certification. On June 27, 2017, the Court denied plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. The plaintiffs also filed a petition with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, asking thethat court to hear an immediate appeal of the trial court’s denial of the motionDistrict Court’s refusal to certify 21 state-law damages classes. On December 3, 2015, the Third Circuit entered an order staying its consideration of the plaintiffs’ request for an immediate appeal of the damages-class ruling pending the trial court’s resolution of the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to certify an injunctive-reliefa class. On July 11, 2017 the plaintiffs filed a petition with the Third Circuit asking the court to hear an immediate appeal of the June 27 order denying plaintiffs’ renewed motion for injunctive class certification. On July 21, 2017, the Company joined other defendants in a response filed with the Third Circuit opposing the plaintiffs' latest petition. The Third Circuit denied both petitions. Therefore, there is no certified class in the indirect purchaser putative class action case, although the plaintiffs could appeal the denials of class certification after a trial on the merits. At this time, all that remains for trial are the claims of the individual named plaintiffs, who seek treble damages under the statutes and common law of various states and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act attacking certain features of the United Egg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines and program used by the Company and many other egg producers. Management believes that neither the aggregate treble damages nor the injunctive relief sought by the individual plaintiffs in these cases, even if awarded, would be material to the Company. The District Court has not yet ruled on either petition.set a trial date for the indirect purchaser case.

The Non-Class Cases. Six ofIn the remaining cases, in whichthe named plaintiffs do not seek to certify a class have been consolidated with the putative class actions into In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:08-md-02002-GP, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The court granted with prejudice the defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss the non-class plaintiffs’ claims for damages arising before September 24, 2004. On July 2, 2015, the Company filed and joined several motions for summary judgmentallege that sought either dismissal of all of the claims in all of these cases or, in the alternative, dismissal of portions of these cases. On July 2, 2015, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of certain affirmative defenses based on statutory immunities from federal antitrust law. The Court heard oral argument on the motions for summary judgment on February 22 and 23, 2016. On September 6, 2016, the Court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiffs’ claims arising from their purchases of egg products, dismissing those claims with prejudice. On September 9, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on liability, dismissing as a matter of law the plaintiffs’ allegations of a side agreement to cease construction of new facilities and ruling that the plaintiffs’ allegations against United Egg Producers’ (UEP) animal-welfare guidelines must be evaluated at trial under the rule of reason. On September 12, 2016, the Court granted in part the Company’s motion for summary judgment on damages, ruling that plaintiffs cannot recover damages arising from purchases of eggs from non-defendants and cannot recover any relief arising fromthey purchased shell eggs and egg products produceddirectly from one or sold in Arizona after October 1, 2009, the date that Arizona mandated that all eggs sold or produced in that state must be produced in compliance with the 2008 versionmore of the UEP animal-welfare guidelines. On September 13, 2016,defendants but sue only for their own alleged damages and not on behalf of a putative class.  Effective January 30, 2018, the Court granted in partCompany entered into a settlement agreement resolving all claims brought by the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment asfollowing non-class plaintiffs: The Kroger Co.; Publix Super Markets, Inc.; SUPERVALU, Inc.; Safeway, Inc.; Albertsons LLC; H.E. Butt Grocery Co.; The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Hy-Vee, Inc.; and Giant Eagle, Inc. Pursuant to the applicability of the Capper-Volstead defense, ruling that United States Egg Marketers (an industry cooperative of whichagreement, the Company is a member) may invokepaid the defense at trial butnon-class plaintiffs $80.8 million on March 23, 2018.

The only non-class plaintiffs that UEP (another industry cooperativeare not included in the settlement agreement are the following companies that sought substantial damages allegedly arising from the purchase of which the Company is a member) cannot. The Capper-Volstead defense is a defense pursuantegg products (as opposed to the Capper-Volstead Act (the Co-operative Marketing Associations Act)shell eggs): Conopco, Inc., enacted by Congress in 1922, which gives certain associations of farmers certain exemptions from antitrust laws. On October 4, 2016, certain direct action plaintiffs (KraftKraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) filed an appeal toCompany. The egg products plaintiffs sought treble damages and injunctive relief under the

United States Court Sherman Act attacking certain features of Appeals for the Third Circuit fromUEP animal-welfare guidelines and program used by the District Court’s Order datedCompany and many other egg producers. On September 6, 2016, grantingthe District Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissingdismissed with prejudice all claims based on the purchase of egg products. TheseThat ruling was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and on January 22, 2018, the Third Circuit reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgement and remanded the case to the District Court. Even though the appealing egg-products plaintiffs had asked the Third Circuit to remand the case for trial, the Third Circuit declined, instead remanding the case for further proceedings, including the suggestion that the District Court determine whether the egg-products plaintiffs had sufficient evidence of causation and damages to submit the case to a jury. On March 5, 2018, defendants filed their opening briefa motion in the District Court seeking leave to file a motion for summary judgment in light of the remand statements in the Third Circuit’s opinion. Plaintiffs opposed that motion, and on March 7, 2017. The26, 2018, the defendants filed their response brief on April 20. These plaintiffs filed theira reply brief on May 18.in support of the motion. The court of appeals heard oral argument on July 11, 2017, but has not issued a ruling. On November 22, 2016, the non-class plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Court to hold a status conference and asking the court to set the non-class cases for trial in June of 2017. The parties in all of the remaining class and non-class cases submitted several different proposed trial schedules to the court, and a status conference was held on February 9, 2017. On August 11, 2017, the Company and certain other defendants filed a motion to exclude damage calculations by direct action plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Baye. The direct action plaintiffs filed a motion to strike on August 25, 2017, and then filed a memorandum in support thereof on August 28, 2017. On September 8, the Company and the other moving defendants filed a response to the plaintiffs’ motion to strike. The court has scheduled a hearing on these latest motions for October 25, 2017.

Allegations in Each Case. In all of the cases described above, the plaintiffs allege that the Company and certain other large domestic egg producers conspired to reduce the domestic supply of eggs in a concerted effort to raise the price of eggs to artificially high levels. In each case, plaintiffs allege that all defendants agreed to reduce the domestic supply of eggs by: (a) agreeing to limit production; (b) manipulating egg exports; and (c) implementing industry-wide animal welfare guidelines that reduced the number of hens and eggs.

The named plaintiffs in the remaining indirect purchaser putative class action seek treble damages under the statutes and common-law of various states and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act on behalf of themselves and all other putative class members in the United States. Although plaintiffs allege a class period starting in October, 2006 and running “through the present,” the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to certify classes seeking damages under the laws of 21 states and denied the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to certify an injunctive-relief class, as discussed above.

Five of the original six non-class cases remain pending against the Company. The principal plaintiffs in these cases are: The Kroger Co.; Publix Super Markets, Inc.; SUPERVALU, Inc.; Safeway, Inc.; Albertsons LLC; H.E. Butt Grocery Co.; The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.; Walgreen Co.; Hy-Vee, Inc.; and Giant Eagle, Inc. In four of these remaining non-class cases, the plaintiffs seek treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act.  In one of those four cases, the plaintiffs purchased only egg products, and as noted above, the Court dismissed with prejudice all claims arising from the purchase of egg products. On October 4, 2016, the four plaintiffs in that case (Kraft Food Global, Inc., General Mills, Inc., Nestle USA, Inc., and The Kellogg Company) appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. In the fifth remaining non-class case, the plaintiff seeks treble damages and injunctive relief under the Sherman Act and the Ohio antitrust act (known as the Valentine Act).

The Pennsylvania court has entered a series of orders related to case management, discovery, class certification, summary judgment, and scheduling.  The Court has also denied all four motions that the plaintiffs filed to exclude testimony from certain expert witnesses retained by the defendants. The court’s latest Case Management Order (No. 23) was filed on September 20, 2017, and indicated that the non-class plaintiffs’ cases would be set for trial later in calendar year 2018.

The Company intends to continue to defend the remaining cases as vigorously as possible based on defenses which the Company believes are meritorious and provable.  While management believes that the likelihood of a material adverse outcome in the overall egg antitrust litigation has been significantly reduced as a result of the settlements and rulings described above, there is still a reasonable possibility of a material adverse outcome in the remaining egg antitrust litigation. At the present time, however, it is not possible to estimate the amount of monetary exposure, if any, to the Company because of these cases.  Accordingly, adjustments,Adjustments, if any, which might result from the resolution of these remaining legal matters, have not been reflected in the financial statements.

Other Matters

In addition to the above, the Company is involved in various other claims and litigation incidental to its business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined with certainty, management, upon the advice of counsel,

is of the opinion that the final outcome should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.


At this time, it is not possible for us to predict the ultimate outcome of the matters set forth above.

 
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS

In the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017, we discussed rules proposed by the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") Agricultural Marketing Service that, if adopted, would have increased our costs to produce organic eggs. During our third quarter of fiscal 2018, the USDA withdrew these rules.

There have been no other material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company's Annual Report on  Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2017.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table is a summary of our firstthird quarter 2018 share repurchases:
      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
06/04/17 to 07/01/17 519
 $39.60
 
 
07/02/17 to 07/29/17 
 
 
 
07/30/17 to 09/02/17 
 
 
 
  519
 $39.60
 
 
      Total Number of Maximum Number
      Shares Purchased of Shares that
  Total Number Average as Part of Publicly May Yet Be
  of Shares Price Paid Announced Plans Purchased Under the
Period Purchased (1) per Share Or Programs Plans or Programs
12/03/17 to 12/30/17 
 $
 
 
12/31/17 to 01/28/18 24,937
 44.20
 
 
01/29/18 to 03/03/18 
 
 
 
  24,937
 $44.20
 
 

(1) As permitted under our 2012 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan, these shares were withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations for employees in connection with the vesting of common stock.


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits
No. Description
3.1 
3.2 
10.1*
31.1* 
31.2* 
32** 
99.1 
101.INS*+ XBRL Instance Document Exhibit 
101.SCH*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document Exhibit 
101.CAL*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document Exhibit 
101.LAB*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document Exhibit 
101.PRE*+ XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
   
* Filed herewith as an Exhibit.
** Furnished herewith as an Exhibit.
+ Submitted electronically with this Quarterly Report.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC.
(Registrant)

Date:OctoberApril 2, 20172018/s/ Timothy A. Dawson
  Timothy A. Dawson
  
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
໿
Date:OctoberApril 2, 20172018/s/ Michael D. Castleberry
  Michael D. Castleberry
  
Vice President, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
໿


2528