UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2017~~2018


¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM to .

Commission File No. 1-13179

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



New York		31-0267900
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

5215 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite 2300, Irving, Texas		75039
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)



	(972) 443-6500
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). þ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨ ~~(do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~
Smaller reporting company ¨	Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ ~~Yes~~No þ No

As of ~~October 23, 2017~~November 1, 2018 there were ~~130,635,017~~130,856,957 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	Page
	No.
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (unaudited)	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (unaudited)	2
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 (unaudited)	4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operations.~~Operations	2431
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market ~~Risk.~~Risk	3747
Item 4. Controls and ~~Procedures.~~Procedures	3847

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal ~~Proceedings.~~Proceedings	3948
Item 1A. Risk ~~Factors.~~Factors	3948
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ~~Proceeds.~~Proceeds	3948
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	49
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	49
Item 5. Other information	49
Item 6. ~~Exhibits.~~Exhibits	4049
SIGNATURES	4150
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Financial Statements.

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)


(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Sales	$	883,380		$	945,939		$	952,716		$	883,380
Cost of sales	(615,848		)	(667,960		)	(644,215		)	(615,368		)
Gross profit	267,532			277,979			308,501			268,012
Selling, general and administrative expense	(206,295		)	(281,261		)	(241,878		)	(206,001		)
Gain on sale of businesses	9,864			—
(Loss) gain on sale of businesses							(7,727		)	9,864
Net earnings from affiliates	2,918			3,394			3,295			2,918
Operating income	74,019			112			62,191			74,793
Interest expense	(15,043		)	(15,141		)	(13,826		)	(15,043		)
Interest income	1,108			924			1,269			1,108
Other income, net	8,285			1,899
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	68,369			(12,206		)
Other (expense) income, net							(5,283		)	7,511
Earnings before income taxes							44,351			68,369
Provision for income taxes	(19,628		)	(2,827		)	(14,912		)	(19,628		)
Net earnings (loss), including noncontrolling interests	48,741			(15,033		)
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests							29,439			48,741
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	(1,136		)	(808		)	(1,234		)	(1,136		)
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	47,605		$	(15,841	)
Net earnings attributable to Flowserve Corporation							$	28,205		$	47,605
Net earnings per share attributable to Flowserve Corporation common shareholders:
Basic	$	0.36		$	(0.12	)	$	0.22		$	0.36
Diluted	0.36			(0.12		)	0.21			0.36
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.19		$	0.19		$	0.19		$	0.19

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands) Three Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016
Net earnings (loss), including noncontrolling interests $ 48,741
$ (15,033 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(10,501) and $9,285 respectively 17,674
(15,587 )
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of taxes of $(333) and $(925), respectively (444 ) 3,719
Cash flow hedging activity, net of taxes of $(200) in 2016 12
560
Other comprehensive income (loss) 17,242
(11,308 )
Comprehensive income, including noncontrolling interests 65,983
(26,341 )
Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (1,090 ) (807 )
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Flowserve Corporation $ 64,893
$ (27,148 )



(Amounts in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	$	29,439		$	48,741
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $3,246 and $(5,209), respectively	(19,669		)	17,674
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of taxes of $(311) and $(557), respectively	2,599			(444		)
Cash flow hedging activity	52			12
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(17,018		)	17,242
Comprehensive income, including noncontrolling interests	12,421			65,983
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(1,578		)	(1,090		)
Comprehensive income attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	10,843		$	64,893

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)



(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Sales	$	2,626,762		$	2,919,553		$	2,845,798		$	2,626,762
Cost of sales	(1,845,796		)	(2,015,755		)	(1,979,807		)	(1,844,303		)
Gross profit	780,966			903,798			865,991			782,459
Selling, general and administrative expense	(681,181		)	(747,513		)	(711,845		)	(680,305		)
Gain on sale of businesses	141,158			—
(Loss) gain on sale of businesses							(7,727		)	141,158
Net earnings from affiliates	9,027			8,522			7,908			9,027
Operating income	249,970			164,807			154,327			252,339
Interest expense	(44,689		)	(44,982		)	(43,645		)	(44,689		)
Interest income	2,373			2,243			4,237			2,373
Other (expense) income, net	(11,602		)	1,070
Other expense, net							(17,206		)	(13,971		)
Earnings before income taxes	196,052			123,138			97,713			196,052
Provision for income taxes	(85,836		)	(49,518		)	(37,028		)	(85,836		)
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	110,216			73,620			60,685			110,216
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	(1,682		)	(1,222		)	(4,117		)	(1,682		)
Net earnings attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	108,534		$	72,398		$	56,568		$	108,534
Net earnings per share attributable to Flowserve Corporation common shareholders:
Basic	$	0.83		$	0.56		$	0.43		$	0.83
Diluted	0.83			0.55			0.43			0.83
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.57		$	0.57		$	0.57		$	0.57

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)



(Amounts in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	$	110,216		$	73,620		$	60,685		$	110,216
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $(50,964) and $7,492, respectively	85,777			(12,577		)
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of taxes of $(996) and $(3,545), respectively	(1,102		)	9,655
Cash flow hedging activity, net of taxes of $(34) and $(620), respectively	96			1,763
Other comprehensive income (loss)	84,771			(1,159		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes of $8,034 and $(17,380), respectively							(61,217		)	85,777
Pension and other postretirement effects, net of taxes of $(898) and $(1,669), respectively							8,106			(1,102		)
Cash flow hedging activity, net of taxes of $(34) in 2017							177			96
Other comprehensive (loss) income							(52,934		)	84,771
Comprehensive income, including noncontrolling interests	194,987			72,461			7,751			194,987
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(2,169		)	(1,983		)	(5,270		)	(2,169		)
Comprehensive income attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	192,818		$	70,478		$	2,481		$	192,818

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


(Amounts in thousands, except par value)	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	502,143		$	367,162		$	529,942		$	703,445
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $65,106 and $51,920, respectively	851,246			882,638
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $54,481 and $59,113, respectively							780,408			856,711
Contract assets, net							261,417			—
Inventories, net	951,598			897,690			655,652			884,273
Prepaid expenses and other	134,023			150,199			97,248			114,316
Total current assets	2,439,010			2,297,689			2,324,667			2,558,745
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $967,458 and $882,151, respectively	673,555			724,805
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $952,293 and $968,033, respectively							608,739			671,796
Goodwill	1,211,544			1,205,054			1,203,768			1,218,188
Deferred taxes	93,638			83,722			61,153			51,974
Other intangible assets, net	212,425			214,527			195,864			210,049
Other assets, net	203,968			183,126			210,873			199,722
Total assets	$	4,834,140		$	4,708,923		$	4,605,064		$	4,910,474

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	360,844		$	412,087		$	400,281		$	443,113
Accrued liabilities	706,838			680,986			398,285			724,196
Contract liabilities							174,245			—
Debt due within one year	80,635			85,365			67,269			75,599
Total current liabilities	1,148,317			1,178,438			1,040,080			1,242,908
Long-term debt due after one year	1,506,057			1,485,258			1,436,746			1,499,658
Retirement obligations and other liabilities	412,137			407,839			497,511			496,954
Shareholders’ equity:
Common shares, $1.25 par value	220,991			220,991			220,991			220,991
Shares authorized – 305,000
Shares issued – 176,793
Capital in excess of par value	488,249			491,848			489,066			488,326
Retained earnings	3,634,750			3,598,396			3,505,051			3,503,947
Treasury shares, at cost – 46,503 and 46,980 shares, respectively	(2,061,054		)	(2,078,527		)
Treasury shares, at cost – 46,240 and 46,471 shares, respectively							(2,049,535		)	(2,059,558		)
Deferred compensation obligation	6,256			8,507			7,025			6,354
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(540,504		)	(624,788		)	(559,559		)	(505,473		)
Total Flowserve Corporation shareholders’ equity	1,748,688			1,616,427			1,613,039			1,654,587
Noncontrolling interests	18,941			20,961			17,688			16,367
Total equity	1,767,629			1,637,388			1,630,727			1,670,954
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,834,140		$	4,708,923		$	4,605,064		$	4,910,474

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


(Amounts in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Cash flows – Operating activities:
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	$	110,216		$	73,620		$	60,685		$	110,216
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation	75,177			74,875			72,668			75,177
Amortization of intangible and other assets	12,767			12,424			12,548			12,767
(Gain) loss on dispositions of businesses	(141,158		)	7,664
Loss (gain) on disposition of businesses							7,727			(141,158		)
Stock-based compensation	20,291			29,966			14,130			20,291
Latin America accounts receivable reserve	—			73,451
Foreign currency, asset impairment and other non-cash adjustments	24,696			(1,037		)
Foreign currency, asset impairments and other non-cash adjustments							31,678			24,696
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net	63,835			69,818			(9,481		)	63,835
Inventories, net	(20,355		)	(31,462		)	(46,699		)	(20,355		)
Prepaid expenses and other	43,546			(58,743		)
Other assets, net	(21,090		)	(19,512		)
Contract assets, net							(54,822		)	—
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net							(16,340		)	22,456
Accounts payable	(68,012		)	(98,782		)	(29,963		)	(68,012		)
Contract liabilities							3,410			—
Accrued liabilities and income taxes payable	(6,702		)	(82,318		)	(13,690		)	(6,702		)
Retirement obligations and other	(18,720		)	7,821			(1,480		)	(18,720		)
Net deferred taxes	(2,131		)	13,155			(4,033		)	(2,131		)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	72,360			70,940			26,338			72,360
Cash flows – Investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(40,620		)	(64,475		)	(49,976		)	(40,620		)
Proceeds from disposal of assets	2,977			632
Proceeds from (payments for) dispositions of businesses	208,775			(5,064		)
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities	171,132			(68,907		)
Proceeds from disposal of assets and other							4,062			2,977
(Payments) proceeds from disposition of businesses							(3,663		)	208,775
Net cash flows (used) provided by investing activities							(49,577		)	171,132
Cash flows – Financing activities:
Payments on long-term debt	(45,000		)	(45,000		)	(45,000		)	(45,000		)
Proceeds under other financing arrangements	6,234			24,701			2,720			6,234
Payments under other financing arrangements	(12,560		)	(12,060		)	(9,093		)	(12,560		)
Payments related to tax withholding for stock-based compensation	(6,287		)	(10,267		)	(2,972		)	(6,287		)
Payments of dividends	(74,412		)	(72,960		)	(74,548		)	(74,412		)
Other	(4,189		)	1,325			(4,333		)	(4,189		)
Net cash flows used by financing activities	(136,214		)	(114,261		)	(133,226		)	(136,214		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	27,703			6,654			(17,038		)	27,703
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	134,981			(105,574		)	(173,503		)	134,981
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	367,162			366,444			703,445			367,162
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	502,143		$	260,870		$	529,942		$	502,143

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

(Unaudited)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.	Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, ~~2017~~2018, the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017 of Flowserve Corporation are unaudited. In management’s opinion, all adjustments comprising normal recurring adjustments necessary for fair statement of such condensed consolidated financial statements have been made. Where applicable, prior period information has been updated to conform to current year presentation.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 ("Quarterly Report") are presented as permitted by Regulation S-X and do not contain certain information included in our annual financial statements and notes thereto. Accordingly, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements presented in our Annual Report on Form ~~10-K/A~~10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 ("~~2016~~2017 Annual Report").

~~Revision to Previously Reported Financial Information~~Argentina Highly Inflationary - –As previously disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017, we identified accounting errors focused mainly at two of our non-U.S. sites in the inventory, accounts receivable, cost of salesEffective July 1, 2018, Argentina was designated as hyperinflationary, and selling, general and administrative balances for prior periods through the first quarter of 2017. We assessed these errors, individually and in the aggregate, and concluded that they were not material to any prior annual or interim period. However, to facilitate comparisons among periods we revised our previously issued audited consolidated financial information which is included in our 2016 Annual Report and unaudited condensed consolidated financial information for the interim periods included in our Form 10-Q/A and Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively. We also corrected the timing of immaterial previously recorded out-of-period adjustments and reflected them in the revised prior period financial statements, where applicable. See Note 2 for more information.

~~Brazil Long-Lived Asset Impairment~~ –In the second quarter of 2017, due to continued capital spending declines in the Brazilian oil and gas market and economic and political circumstances, including the indictment of the former president, the decision was made to scale back certain of our operations in Brazil. Asas a result, we began using the U.S. dollar as our functional currency in the second quarter of 2017, we tested our related long-lived assets, which primarily consist of property, plant and equipment, for recoverability and recorded a $26.0 million impairment charge to selling, general and administrative expense ("SG&A") within our Engineered Product Division ("EPD") segment.

~~Venezuela~~ –Argentina. Our ~~operations in Venezuela primarily consist of a service center that performs service and repair activities. Our Venezuelan~~Argentinian subsidiary's sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 represented less than 0.5% of consolidated sales~~2018 and ~~its~~total assets at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 represented less than 0.5% of total consolidated assets. Assets primarily consisted of United States ("U.S.") dollar-denominated monetary assets and bolivar-denominated non-monetary assets at September 30, 2017. In addition, certainapproximately 1% of our ~~operations in other countries sell equipment~~consolidated sales and parts that are typically denominated in U.S. dollars directly to Venezuelan customers. In the third quarter of 2016 we recorded a charge of $73.5 million to SG&A to fully reserve for those potentially uncollectible accounts receivable (classified as other assets, net on the condensed consolidated balance sheet) and a charge to cost of sales ("COS") of $1.9 million to reserve for related net inventory exposures. We continue to pursue payments from our Venezuelan customer.total assets.

~~Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets~~ ~~– As discussed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report, the value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible~~

~~assets is tested for impairment as of December 31 each year or whenever events or circumstances indicate such assets may be impaired.~~

We did not record an impairment of goodwill in 2016, 2015 or 2014; however at December 31, 2016 the estimated fair value of our Engineered Product Operations ("EPO") and Industrial Product Division ("IPD") reporting units reduced significantly due to broad-based capital spending declines and heightened pricing pressure experienced in the oil and gas markets which are anticipated to continue in the near to mid-term. Although we concluded that there is no impairment on the goodwill associated with our EPO and IPD reporting units as of December 31, 2016, we will continue to closely monitor their performance and related market conditions for future indicators of potential impairment and reassess accordingly.

~~Accounting Policies~~

~~Significant accounting policies, for which no significant changes have occurred in the~~ ~~nine~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017, are detailed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Accounting Developments

Pronouncements ~~Implemented~~

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory." The ASU updates represent changes to simplify the subsequent measurement of inventory. Previous to the issuance of this ASU, ASC 330 required that an entity measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. The amendments of ASU 2015-11 updates that “market” requirement to “net realizable value,” which is defined by the ASU as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Our adoption of ASU No. 2015-11 effective January 1, 2017 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting." The ASU affects the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions as it relates to accounting for income taxes, accounting for forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements. We adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption resulted in the recognition of approximately $1 million of tax expense in our provision of income taxes and an approximately $3 million one-time, cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings related to the change in our accounting policy for estimated forfeitures and share cancellations. In addition, in our statements of cash flows we reclassified cash outflows for employee taxes paid from operating to financing and elected to reclassify cash impacts due to excess tax deficiencies and benefits from financing to operating, which resulted in a net reclassification of approximately $10 million of cash flows used from operating to financing for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

~~Pronouncements Not Yet~~ Implemented

In May 2014, the FASB issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" (the "New Revenue Standard" or "ASC 606"), which supersedes most of the revenue recognition requirements in "Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)." The standard is principle-based and provides a five-step model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue when (or as) it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Companies are permitted to adopt the new standard using one of two transition methods. Under the full retrospective method, the requirements of the new standard are applied to contracts for each prior reporting period presented and the cumulative effect of applying the standard is recognized in the earliest period presented. Under the modified retrospective method, the requirements of the new standard are applied to contracts that are open as of("Topic 605"). On January 1, 2018, we adopted the required date of adoption, and the cumulative effect of applying the standard is recognized as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in that same year. The standard also includes significantly expanded disclosure requirements for revenue. Since 2014, the FASB has issued several updates to Topic 606.

We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2014-09 and all related ASU's on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. We plan to adopt the new revenue guidance effective January 1, 2018New Revenue Standard using the modified retrospective method for transition, applying the guidance to those contracts which were not completed as of that date. ~~In 2015,~~According to our method of transition we ~~established a cross-functional implementation team consisting of representatives from across all of our reportable segments to begin~~adjusted for the ~~process of analyzing the impact~~cumulative effect of the ~~new standard on~~changes made to our ~~contracts~~.condensed consolidated balance sheet and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to increase retained earnings by approximately $20 million, mostly associated with the increase in percentage of completion ("POC") method revenue, as a result of initially applying the standard. We have ~~determined the applicability of the key factors of the five step model and developed a framework of~~modified our accounting policies and practices, to meet the requirements of the of the new standard. The results of our evaluation indicate that one of the changes upon adoption may be potentially increased "over-time" ("percentage of completion") revenue recognition. Historically, revenue recognized under the percentage of completion method has been less than 5% to 7% of our consolidated sales. The adoption of the new standard could substantially increase this range depending on the terms and conditions of the contracts in our backlog at January 1, 2018 and future contracts. We also anticipate changes to the consolidated balance sheet related to accounts receivable, inventory, contract assets and contract liabilities. We expect to further our assessment on the financial impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and to align our business processes, systems and controls to support compliance with the standard ~~during~~requirements. Revenue recognition and related financial information for this Quarterly Report are based on the ~~remainder~~requirements of ~~2017. We will continue~~ASC 606. Accordingly, periods prior to January 1, 2018 are presented in accordance with Topic 605. Refer to Note 2 of this Quarterly Report for a discussion on our ~~evaluation of ASU 2014-09 as well as new or emerging interpretations~~adoption of the ~~standard through the date of adoption.~~New Revenue Standard.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The ASU requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The ASU also requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments. The requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet has been eliminated by this ASU. ~~This~~In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact~~No. 2018-03, "Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10)" to clarify certain aspects of ASU No. 2016-01. Our adoption of ASU No. 2016-01 and ASU No. 2018-03 effective January 1, 2018 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments - A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” The update was issued with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230 and other topics. Our adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

Table of Contents

to be deferred until the inventory has been sold to a third party. Our adoption of ASU No. 2016-16 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash." The amendments in this ASU require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Our adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): "Clarifying the Definition of a Business." The ASU clarifies the definition of a business and provides guidance on evaluating as to whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition clarification as outlined in this ASU affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. Our adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, "Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets." The FASB issued this ASU to clarify the scope of subtopic 610-20, which the FASB had failed to define in its issuance of ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." We adopted ASU No. 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018, concurrently with ASU No. 2014-09. Our adoption of ASU No. 2017-05 effective January 1, 2018 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost." The ASU requires entities to disaggregate the current service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and present it with other current compensation costs for related employees in the income statement and present the other components of net benefit cost elsewhere in the income statement and outside of operating income. Entities are required to retrospectively apply the requirement for a separate presentation in the income statement of service costs and other components of net benefit cost. We adopted the income statement presentation aspects of this new guidance on a retrospective basis. The following is a reconciliation of the effect of the reclassification of the net post-retirement benefit cost from cost of sales ("COS") and selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") to other expense, net in our condensed consolidated statement of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017:



(Amounts in thousands)	As Previously Reported			Adjustments(1)			As Reported
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Cost of sales	$	(615,848	)	$	480		$	(615,368	)
Gross profit	267,532			480			268,012
Selling, general and administrative expense	(206,295		)	294			(206,001		)
Operating income	74,019			774			74,793
Other income, net	8,285			(774		)	7,511

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Cost of sales	$	(1,845,796	)	$	1,493		$	(1,844,303	)
Gross profit	780,966			1,493			782,459
Selling, general and administrative expense	(681,181		)	876			(680,305		)
Operating income	249,970			2,369			252,339
Other expense, net	(11,602		)	(2,369		)	(13,971		)

(1) We elected the practical expedient that allows us to use the amounts disclosed in prior comparative periods’ pension and postretirement plan footnotes as the basis for the retrospective application of the new income statement presentation requirements. See Note 11 of this Quarterly Report for additional information on the components of the net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits plans.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting." The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards, to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting. The ASU is applied prospectively to awards modified on or

Table of Contents

after the effective date. Our adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 effective January 1, 2018 did not have an impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The ASU requires that organizations that lease assets recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The ASU will affect the presentation of lease related expenses on the income statement and statement of cash flows and will increase the required disclosures related to leases. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-02 and all related ASU's on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. ~~Although we~~We have formed a project team and are ~~continuing~~in the process of assessing critical components of this new guidance and the potential impact that the guidance will have on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. This evaluation process includes a review of our leasing contracts and a completeness assessment over our lease population. We are implementing a software tool and are concurrently identifying changes to ~~evaluate, upon~~our business processes, systems and controls to support adoption of the new standard. Based on the preliminary work completed and our initial qualitative evaluation, we believe a key change upon adoption of the standard will be the balance sheet recognition of leased assets and liabilities. ~~Based~~Also, based on ~~our~~the same qualitative evaluation, ~~to date,~~ we believe that any changes in income statement recognition will not be material.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments." The ~~amendments~~ASU requires, among other things, the use of a new current expected credit loss ("CECL") model in ~~this ASU replace~~order to determine our allowances for doubtful accounts with respect to accounts receivable and contract assets. The CECL model requires that we estimate our lifetime expected credit loss with respect to our receivables and contract assets and record allowances that, when deducted from the ~~current incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology~~balance of the receivables, represent the net amounts expected to be collected. We will also be required to disclose information about how we developed the allowances, including changes in the factors that ~~reflects~~influenced our estimate of expected credit losses and ~~requires consideration~~the reasons for those changes. The amendments of ~~a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. This~~the ASU isare effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-13 ~~on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.~~

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments - A consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.” The update was issued with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230 and other topics. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740) Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory." The ASU guidance requires the recognition of the income tax consequences of an intercompany asset transfer, other than transfers of inventory, when the transfer occurs. For intercompany transfers of inventory, the income tax effects will continue to be deferred until the inventory has been sold to a third party. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2016-16 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash." The amendments in this ASU require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods with those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-18 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): "Clarifying the Definition of a Business." The ASU clarifies the definition of a business and provides guidance on evaluating as to whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The definition clarification as outlined in this ASU affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. The amendments of the ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU No. 2017-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment." The amendments in this ASU allow companies to apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The amendments of the ASU are effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017-04 ~~on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.~~

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, "Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets." The FASB issued this ASU to clarify the scope of subtopic 610-20, which the FASB had failed to define in its issuance of ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." ASU No. 2017-05 will be effective concurrently with ASU No. 2014-09. Similarly to ASU 2014-09, we are continuing our evaluation of ASU No. 2017-05 to determine the impact on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost." The amendments of this ASU provide additional guidance intended to improve the presentation of net benefit costs, pension costs and net periodic postretirement costs.

~~Table of Contents~~

The amendments in this ASU must be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and to interim periods in 2018. Early adoption of the standard is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017- 07 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

On May 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting." The amendments in this ASU provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The amendments of the ASU must be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption of the standard is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017-09 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

On July 13, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatory Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatory Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.” The ASU amends guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 260, Earnings Per Share, FASB ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The amendments in Part I of this ASU change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. The amendments in Part II of the ASU re-characterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the codification, to a scope exception. The amendments in this ASU must be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017-11 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted improvements of Accounting ~~For~~for Hedging Activities." The purpose of this ASU is to better align a company’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships. Additionally, the ASU simplifies the hedge accounting requirements and improve the disclosures of hedging arrangements. The ~~effective date~~amendments in this ASU must be applied to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is ~~fiscal year 2020, with early adoption~~ permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017-12 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”)." The ASU and its amendments were issued as a result of the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The amendments of this ASU address the available options to reclassify stranded tax effects within AOCI to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change (or portion thereof) is recorded. Additionally, the ASU outlines the disclosure requirements for releasing income tax effects from

Table of Contents

AOCI. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2018-02 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Non-employee Share-based Payment Accounting." The amendments of this ASU apply to all share-based payment transactions to non-employees, in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations, accounted under ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Under the amendments of ASU 2018-07, most of the guidance on compensation to nonemployees would be aligned with the requirements for shared based payments granted to employees, Topic 718. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2018-07 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement." The amendments of the ASU modify the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements by removing, modifying, or adding certain disclosure information requirements for assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the statement of financial position or disclosed in the notes to financial statements. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for the removed disclosures and delayed adoption until fiscal year 2020 permitted for the new disclosures. The removed and modified disclosures will be adopted on a retrospective basis and the new disclosures will be adopted on a prospective basis. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2018-13 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans." The ASU amends the disclosure requirements by adding, clarifying, or removing certain disclosures for sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The amendments are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and the amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2018-14 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract." The ASU addresses how entities should account for costs associated with implementing a cloud computing arrangement that is considered a service contract. Per the amendments of the ASU, implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract should be accounted for in the same manner as implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain software for internal use as prescribed by guidance in ASC350-40. The ASU requires that implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement be capitalized rather than expensed. Further, the ASU specifies the method for the amortization of costs incurred during implementation, and the manner in which the unamortized portion of these capitalized implementation costs should be evaluated for impairment. The ASU also provides guidance on how to present such implementation costs in the financial statements and also creates additional disclosure requirements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods. Early adoption of the ASU requirements is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The amendments in this ASU should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2018-15 on our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.


2.	~~Revision to Previously Reported Financial Information~~Revenue Recognition

~~As described~~We enter into contracts with customers typically having multiple commitments of goods and services including any combination of designing, developing, manufacturing, modifying, installing and commissioning of flow management equipment and providing services and parts related to the performance of such products. We evaluate the commitments in ~~Note 1, we revised~~our contracts with customers to determine if the ~~annual~~commitments are both capable of being distinct and ~~quarterly periods prior to June 30, 2017. The following table presents~~distinct in the ~~effect~~context of the ~~prior period revisions on~~contract in order to identify performance obligations.

We recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation by transferring control of the ~~affected line items~~performance obligation to a customer. Control of ~~our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016:~~

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
As Reported Adjustments As Revised
Sales $ 943,334
$ 2,605
$ 945,939
Cost of sales (1) (677,891 ) 9,931
(667,960 )
Gross profit 265,443
12,536
277,979
Selling, general and administrative expense (2) (271,643 ) (9,618 ) (281,261 )
Operating (loss) income (2,806 ) 2,918
112
Loss before income taxes (15,124 ) 2,918
(12,206 )
Provision for income taxes (3) (4,996 ) 2,169
(2,827 )
Net loss, including noncontrolling interests (20,120 ) 5,087
(15,033 )
Net loss attributable to Flowserve Corporation $ (20,928 ) $ 5,087
$ (15,841 )
Net loss per share attributable to Flowserve Corporation common shareholders:
Basic $ (0.16 ) $ 0.04
$ (0.12 )
Diluted (0.16 ) 0.04
(0.12 )

(1) The cost of sales adjustments primarily relate to corrections of previously recorded out of period including an aggregate $8.7 million associated with our EPD reporting segment to write down inventory in Brazil.

(2) The selling, general and administrative expense adjustments primarily relate to receivables from our primary Venezuelan customer at one non-U.S. manufacturing site in our EPD segment of $(10.3) million. These receivables should have been included in the charge that we recorded in the third quarter of 2016 to fully reserve all the potentially uncollectible receivables.

~~(3) The provision for income taxes adjustment primarily relates~~a performance obligation may transfer to the ~~tax effect~~customer either over time or at a point in time depending on an evaluation of the ~~adjustment described in footnote (2) above.~~specific facts and circumstances for each contract, including the terms and conditions of the contract as agreed with the customer, as well as the nature of the products or services to be provided. Our larger contracts are typically completed within a one to three-year period, while many other contracts, such as “short cycle” contracts, have a shorter timeframe for revenue recognition.

Table of Contents

Control transfers over time when the customer is able to direct the use of and obtain substantially all of the benefits of our work as we perform. This typically occurs when products have no alternative use and we have a right to payment for performance completed to date, including a reasonable profit margin. Our contracts often include cancellation provisions that require the customer to reimburse us for costs incurred up to the date of cancellation, and some contracts also provide for reimbursement of profit upon cancellation in addition to costs incurred to date.

Our primary method for recognizing revenue over time is the POC method. We measure progress towards completion by applying an input measure based on costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion (i.e., the cost-to-cost method). This method provides a reasonable depiction of the transfer of control of products and services to customers as it ensures our efforts towards satisfying a performance obligation, as reflected by costs incurred, are included in the measure of progress used for recognition of revenue. Costs generally include direct labor, direct material and manufacturing overhead. Costs that do not contribute towards control transfer are generally immaterial, but are excluded from the measure of progress in the event they are significant.

Historically, revenue recognized under the POC method has been 5% to 10% of our consolidated sales. Under the New Revenue Standard, we have experienced an increase in the amount of revenue recognized over time. This increase is primarily due to the application of the new “transfer of control” model for revenue recognition. Under this model, revenue for performance obligations subject to contractual transfer of control during the manufacturing process are recognized over time. This includes contracts with cancellation provisions that require reimbursement for costs incurred plus a reasonable margin and for which the performance obligation has no alternative use. Revenue from products and services transferred to customers over time accounted for approximately 21% and 5% of total revenue for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 22% and 4% of total revenue for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

If control does not transfer over time, then control transfers at a point in time. We recognize revenue at a point in time at the level of each performance obligation based on the evaluation of certain indicators of control transfer, such as title transfer, risk of loss transfer, customer acceptance and physical possession. Revenue from products and services transferred to customers at a point in time accounted for approximately 79% and 95% of total revenue for the three month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and 78% and 96% of total revenue for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

A contract modification, or “change order,” occurs when the existing enforceable rights and obligations of a contract change, such as a change in the scope, price or terms and conditions. We account for a change order as a new accounting contract when the change order is limited to adding new, distinct products and services that are priced in an amount consistent with standalone selling price. Other change orders are accounted for as a modification of the existing accounting contract. When a change order occurs for a contract having in-process over time performance obligations, the effect of the change order on the transaction price and the measure of progress for the performance obligations to which it relates is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis.

Freight charges billed to customers are included in sales and the related shipping costs are included in cost of sales in our consolidated statements of income. If shipping activities are performed after a customer obtains control of a product, we apply a policy election to account for shipping as an activity to fulfill the promise to transfer the product to the customer.

We apply a policy election to exclude transaction taxes collected from customers from sales when the tax is both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction.

In certain instances, we provide guaranteed completion dates under the terms of our contracts. Failure to meet contractual delivery dates can result in late delivery penalties or liquidated damages. In the event that the transaction price of such a contract is probable of experiencing a significant reversal due to a penalty, we constrain a portion of the transaction price. This reduction to the transaction price could potentially cause estimated total contract costs to exceed the transaction price, in which case we record a provision for the estimated loss in the period the loss is first projected. In circumstances where the transaction price still exceeds total projected costs, the estimated penalty generally reduces profitability of the contract at the time of subsequent revenue recognition.

Our incremental costs to obtain a contract are limited to sales commissions. We apply the practical expedient to expense commissions as incurred for contracts having a duration of one year or less. Sales commissions related to contracts with a duration of greater than one year are immaterial to our financial statements and are also expensed as incurred.

We have not identified any material costs to fulfill a contract that qualify for capitalization under ASC 340-40.

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account for recognition of revenue. Many of our contracts have multiple performance obligations as the promise to transfer the individual goods or services, or certain groups of goods and services, is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract.

Table of Contents

We allocate the transaction price of each contract to the performance obligations on the basis of standalone selling price and recognize revenue when, or as, control of each performance obligation transfers to the customer. For standard products, we identify the standalone selling price based on directly observable information. For customized or unique products and services, we apply the cost plus margin approach to estimate the standalone selling price. Under this method, we forecast our expected costs of satisfying a performance obligation and then add an appropriate standalone market margin for that distinct good or service.

We have elected to use the practical expedient to not adjust the transaction price of a contract for the effects of a significant financing component if, at the inception of the contract, we expect that the period between when we transfer a promised good or service to a customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will be one year or less.

A material product warranty exists when a customer has specifically requested or negotiated a warranty period that is significantly longer than our standard warranty period (i.e., a “service-type warranty”) and where the warranty obligation is material in the context of the contract. It is not common for our contracts to contain material product warranties. However, when such a warranty exists, we account for it as a separate performance obligation. We estimate the standalone selling price of the warranty obligation utilizing a cost plus margin approach and allocate a portion of the transaction price to the warranty performance obligation on the basis of estimated standalone selling price. We recognize revenue for warranty performance obligations over time on a straight line basis over the extended warranty period.

A material right option is a benefit provided to a customer in a current contract, such as an option to receive future products or services for free or at a significant discount, that is incremental to benefits widely available to similar customers that do not enter into a specific contract. It is not common for our contracts to contain material right options. However, when a material right option exists, it is accounted for as a separate performance obligation and a portion of the transaction price is allocated to the performance obligation based on the estimated standalone selling price of the option. Revenue is recognized when (or as) the customer exercises the right to acquire future products and/or services.

On September 30, 2018, the aggregate transaction price allocated to unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations was approximately $1,354 million. We estimate recognition of approximately $658 million of this amount as revenue in the remainder of 2018 and an additional $696 million in 2019 and thereafter.

Revenue recognized for performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in prior periods for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 was not material.

Table of Contents

ASC 606 Adoption Impact

We applied ASC 606 only to contracts that were not substantially complete as of January 1, 2018 and reflected the aggregate impact of all contract modifications (“change orders”) that occurred before the beginning of the earliest period presented when accounting for modified contracts at transition. The following table presents the cumulative effect of the changes made to our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2018 related to the adoption of the New Revenue Standard:



	December 31, 2017	Adjustments due to adoption of New Revenue Standard		January 1, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	December 31, 2017	Adjustments due to adoption of New Revenue Standard		January 1, 2018
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts(1)	856,711	(49,247	)	807,464
Contract assets, net(2)	—	219,361		219,361
Inventories, net(3)	884,273	(238,573	)	645,700
Prepaid expenses and other	114,316	(4,457	)	109,859
Total current assets	2,558,745	(72,916	)	2,485,829
Deferred taxes	51,974	(2,706	)	49,268
Other assets, net	199,722	2,004		201,726
Total assets	4,910,474	(73,618	)	4,836,856
Accounts payable	443,113	11,784		454,897
Accrued liabilities(4)	724,196	(290,445	)	433,751
Contract liabilities(5)	—	178,515		178,515
Total current liabilities	1,242,908	(100,146	)	1,142,762
Retirement obligations and other liabilities	496,954	6,568		503,522
Retained earnings	3,503,947	19,642		3,523,589
Total equity	1,670,954	19,960		1,690,914
Total liabilities and equity	4,910,474	(73,618	)	4,836,856

(1) Adjusted for contract assets accounted for under delivery based methods, previously reported in receivables, net.

(2) Represents our right of payment in advance of our contractual right to bill the customer.

(3) Adjusted for contract assets accounted under the over time method, previously reported in inventories, net.

(4) Adjusted for deferred revenue previously reported in accrued liabilities and reclassified to contract assets and contract liabilities.

(5) Represents contractual billings in excess of revenue recognized at the contract level, previously reported in accrued liabilities.

Table of Contents

The modified retrospective approach requires a dual reporting presentation to be disclosed in the year of adoption. The dual reporting requirement outlines the impact amount by which a financial statement line is affected in the current reporting period by the adoption of the New Revenue Standard as compared with the previous standard in effect before the adoption.

The following tables present the dual reporting requirements:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)	Balances without Adoption of New Revenue Standard			Effect of Change			As Reported
Sales	$	929,037		$	23,679		$	952,716
Cost of sales	(635,505		)	(8,710		)	(644,215		)
Gross profit	293,532			14,969			308,501
Gross profit margin	31.6		%				32.4		%
Selling, general and administrative expense	(241,877		)	(1		)	(241,878		)
Loss on sale of business	(7,727		)	—			(7,727		)
Net earnings from affiliates	3,295			—			3,295
Operating income	47,223			14,968			62,191
Operating income as a percent of sales	5.1		%				6.5		%
Interest expense	(13,826		)	—			(13,826		)
Interest income	1,269			—			1,269
Other expense, net	(5,494		)	211			(5,283		)
Earnings before income taxes	29,172			15,179			44,351
Provision for income taxes	(8,081		)	(6,831		)	(14,912		)
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	21,091			8,348			29,439
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	(1,234		)	—			(1,234		)
Net earnings attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	19,857		$	8,348		$	28,205


(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
	As Reported			Adjustments			As Revised			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)										Balances without Adoption of New Revenue Standard			Effect of Change			As Reported
Sales	$	2,916,814		$	2,739		$	2,919,553		$	2,740,895		$	104,903		$	2,845,798
Cost of sales ~~(1)~~	(2,018,646		)	2,891			(2,015,755		)	(1,904,728		)	(75,079		)	(1,979,807		)
Gross profit	898,168			5,630			903,798			836,167			29,824			865,991
Selling, general and administrative expense (2)	(737,083		)	(10,430		)	(747,513		)
Gross profit margin										30.5		%				30.4		%
Selling, general and administrative expense										(711,845		)	—			(711,845		)
Loss on sale of business										(7,727		)	—			(7,727		)
Net earnings from affiliates										7,908			—			7,908
Operating income	169,607			(4,800		)	164,807			124,503			29,824			154,327
Other income (expense), net	2,091			(1,021		)	1,070
Operating income as a percent of sales										4.5		%				5.4		%
Interest expense										(43,645		)	—			(43,645		)
Interest income										4,237			—			4,237
Other expense, net										(17,116		)	(90		)	(17,206		)
Earnings before income taxes	128,959			(5,821		)	123,138			67,979			29,734			97,713
Provision for income taxes (3)	(47,809		)	(1,709		)	(49,518		)
Provision for income taxes										(29,039		)	(7,989		)	(37,028		)
Net earnings, including noncontrolling interests	81,150			(7,530		)	73,620			38,940			21,745			60,685
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests										(4,117		)	—			(4,117		)
Net earnings attributable to Flowserve Corporation	$	79,928		$	(7,530	)	$	72,398		$	34,823		$	21,745		$	56,568
Net earnings per share attributable to Flowserve Corporation common shareholders:
Basic	$	0.61		$	(0.05	)	$	0.56
Diluted	0.61			(0.06		)	0.55

Table of Contents



	September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	Balances without Adoption of New Revenue Standard	Effect of Change		As Reported
Accounts receivable, net	840,975	(60,567	)	780,408
Contract assets, net	—	261,417		261,417
Inventories, net	969,941	(314,289	)	655,652
Prepaid expenses and other	111,753	(14,505	)	97,248
Total current assets	2,452,611	(127,944	)	2,324,667
Deferred taxes	63,859	(2,706	)	61,153
Other assets, net	209,536	1,337		210,873
Total assets	4,734,377	(129,313	)	4,605,064
Accounts payable	385,209	15,072		400,281
Accrued liabilities	764,575	(366,290	)	398,285
Contract liabilities	—	174,245		174,245
Total current liabilities	1,217,053	(176,973	)	1,040,080
Retirement obligations and other liabilities	494,002	3,509		497,511
Retained earnings	3,460,482	44,569		3,505,051
Total equity	1,586,576	44,151		1,630,727
Total liabilities and equity	4,734,377	(129,313	)	4,605,064

Disaggregated Revenue

We conduct our operations through three business segments based on the type of product and how we manage the business:

Engineered Product Division ("EPD") for long lead time, custom and other highly-engineered pumps and pump systems, mechanical seals, auxiliary systems and replacement parts and related services;

Industrial Product Division ("IPD") for engineered and pre-configured industrial pumps and pump systems and related products and services; and

Flow Control Division ("FCD") for engineered and industrial valves, control valves, actuators and controls and related services.

Our revenue sources are derived from our original equipment manufacturing and our aftermarket sales and services. Our original equipment revenues are generally related to originally designed, manufactured, distributed and installed equipment that can range from pre-configured, short-cycle products to more customized, highly-engineered equipment ("Original Equipment"). Our aftermarket sales and services are derived from sales of replacement equipment, as well as maintenance, advanced diagnostic, repair and retrofitting services ("Aftermarket"). Each of our three business segments generate Original Equipment and Aftermarket revenues.

Table of Contents

The following table presents our customer revenues disaggregated by revenue source:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
Original Equipment	$	137,177	$	118,523	$	239,864	$	495,564
Aftermarket	319,656		71,942		65,554		457,152
	$	456,833	$	190,465	$	305,418	$	952,716

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017(1)
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
Original Equipment	$	116,723	$	112,332	$	214,355	$	443,410
Aftermarket	299,308		68,015		72,647		439,970
	$	416,031	$	180,347	$	287,002	$	883,380



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
Original Equipment	$	407,761	$	348,483	$	689,331	$	1,445,575
Aftermarket	977,038		225,524		197,661		1,400,223
	$	1,384,799	$	574,007	$	886,992	$	2,845,798

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017(1)
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
Original Equipment	$	365,383	$	331,887	$	646,746	$	1,344,016
Aftermarket	887,158		201,415		194,173		1,282,746
	$	1,252,541	$	533,302	$	840,919	$	2,626,762

(1) ~~The cost of sales adjustments primarily relate to corrections of previously recorded out of period including an aggregate $4.6 million associated~~Prior periods are presented in accordance with ~~our EPD reporting segment to write down inventory in Brazil.~~

~~(2) The selling, general and administrative expense adjustments primarily relate to the matter described in footnote (2) above.~~

(3) The provision for income taxes adjustments include the impact of recording a valuation allowance of $(5.0) million related to deferred tax assets that subsequently were determined to not be realizable, partially offset by the tax effect of the matter described in footnote (2) above.Topic 605.

Our customer sales are diversified geographically. The ~~effect of the prior period revisions~~following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geography, based on the ~~condensed consolidated statement~~shipping addresses of ~~cash flows~~our customers:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
North America(1)	$	169,378	$	82,102	$	140,898	$	392,378
Latin America(1)	69,121		7,090		4,461		80,672
Middle East and Africa	51,800		10,058		33,908		95,766
Asia Pacific	96,021		23,271		65,858		185,150
Europe	70,513		67,944		60,293		198,750
	$	456,833	$	190,465	$	305,418	$	952,716

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017(2)
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
North America(1)	$	160,661	$	70,259	$	112,483	$	343,403
Latin America(1)	36,790		7,752		5,976		50,518
Middle East and Africa	56,846		10,796		43,964		111,606
Asia Pacific	90,510		19,820		59,002		169,332
Europe	71,224		71,720		65,577		208,521
	$	416,031	$	180,347	$	287,002	$	883,380

Table of Contents



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
North America (1)	$	536,936	$	237,659	$	398,872	$	1,173,467
Latin America(1)	139,968		21,392		15,454		176,814
Middle East and Africa	175,980		37,559		99,954		313,493
Asia Pacific	316,392		69,590		198,437		584,419
Europe	215,523		207,807		174,275		597,605
	$	1,384,799	$	574,007	$	886,992	$	2,845,798

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017(2)
	EPD		IPD		FCD		Total
North America (1)	$	485,973	$	215,593	$	345,591	$	1,047,157
Latin America(1)	99,905		21,813		25,273		146,991
Middle East and Africa	175,968		37,191		101,346		314,505
Asia Pacific	270,726		66,278		160,632		497,636
Europe	219,969		192,427		208,077		620,473
	$	1,252,541	$	533,302	$	840,919	$	2,626,762

(1) North America represents United States and Canada; Latin America includes Mexico.

(2) Prior periods are presented in accordance with Topic 605.

Contract Balances

We receive payment from customers based on a contractual billing schedule and specific performance requirements as established in our contracts. We record billings as accounts receivable when an unconditional right to consideration exists. A contract asset represents revenue recognized in advance of our right to receive payment under the terms of a contract. A contract liability represents our right to receive payment in advance of revenue recognized for a contract.

The following table presents opening and closing balances of contract assets and contract liabilities, current and long-term, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 related to net earnings, including noncontrolling interests, for the change~~2018:



( Amounts in thousands)	Contract Assets, net (Current)			Long-term Contract Assets, net(1)			Contract Liabilities (Current)			Long-term Contract Liabilities(2)
Beginning balance, January 1, 2018	$	219,361		3,990			$	178,515		$	3,925
Revenue recognized that was included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period	—			—			(125,046		)	(1,154		)
Increase due to revenue recognized in the period in excess of billings	591,725			1,335			—			—
Increase due to billings arising during the period in excess of revenue recognized	—			—			134,583			(30		)
Amounts transferred from contract assets to receivables	(531,944		)	(2,488		)	—			—
Currency effects and other, net	(17,725		)	(175		)	(13,807		)	(858		)
Ending balance, September 30, 2018	$	261,417		$	2,662		$	174,245		$	1,883

(1) Included in ~~net earnings~~other assets, net.

(2) Included in ~~the table above, offset primarily by impacts to changes in assets~~retirement obligations and other liabilities. The revisions to individual line items were below $3 million except for the classification change within operating activity cash flows of $15.9 million from Latin America inventory write downs to inventories, net and an increase of $10.3 million to Latin America accounts receivables reserve. Additionally, we adopted ASU 2016-09 on January 1, 2017, see Note 1 for further discussion of the impact of that adoption on our statements of cash flows.

~~The impacts of the revisions have been reflected throughout the financial statements, including the applicable footnotes, as appropriate.~~


3.	Dispositions

IPD Business Divestiture

On June 29, 2018, pursuant to a plan of sale approved by management, we executed an agreement to divest two IPD locations and associated product lines, including the related assets and liabilities. This transaction did not meet the criteria for

Table of Contents

classification of assets held for sale as of June 30, 2018 due to a contingency that could have potentially impacted the final terms and/or timing of the divestiture. The sale transaction was completed on August 9, 2018. In the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $25.1 million, including a pre-tax charge of $17.4 million in the second quarter of 2018 and a loss on sale of the business of $7.7 million in the third quarter of 2018. The second quarter of 2018 pre-tax charge related to write-downs of inventory and long-lived assets to their estimated fair value, of which $7.7 million was recorded in COS and $9.7 million was recorded in SG&A. The third quarter of 2018 pre-tax charge primarily related to working capital changes since the second quarter of 2018 and net cash transferred at the closing date of $3.7 million. The sale included a manufacturing facility in Germany and a related assembly facility in France. In 2017, net sales related to the business totaled approximately $42 million, although the business produced an operating loss in each of the last two fiscal years.

Vogt

Effective July 6, 2017, we sold our ~~Flow Control Division's ("FCD")~~FCD's Vogt product line and related assets and liabilities to a privately held company for $28.0 million of cash received at closing. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of ~~$10.9~~$11.1 million recorded in gain on sale of business in the condensed consolidated statements of ~~income.~~income in the third quarter of 2017. In 2016, net sales related to the Vogt business totaled approximately $17 million, with earnings before interest and taxes of approximately $4 million.

Gestra AG

Effective May 2, 2017, we sold our FCD's Gestra AG ("Gestra") business to a leading provider of steam system solutions for $203.6 million (€178.3 million), which included $180.8 million (€158.3 million) of cash received ~~at closing~~ (net of divested cash and subsequent working capital adjustments). Additionally, we expect to receive $23.6 million (€20.0 million) of cash currently held in escrow before the end of 2017, which we have classified as an other current asset in prepaid expenses and other. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $130.2 million ($79.4 million after-tax) recorded in gain on sale of business in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated statements of ~~income.~~income in 2017. The sale included Gestra’s manufacturing facility in Germany as well as related operations in the U.S., the United Kingdom ("U.K."), Spain, Poland, Italy, Singapore and Portugal. In 2016, Gestra recorded revenues of approximately $101 million (€92 million) with earnings before interest and taxes of approximately $17 million (€15 million).

~~Table of Contents~~


4.	Stock-Based Compensation Plans

We maintain the Flowserve Corporation Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the "2010 Plan"), which is a shareholder-approved plan authorizing the issuance of up to 8,700,000 shares of our common stock in the form of restricted shares, restricted share units and performance-based units (collectively referred to as "Restricted Shares"), incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights and bonus stock. Of the 8,700,000 shares of common stock authorized under the 2010 Plan, ~~2,634,908~~2,061,105 were available for issuance as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. In 2016 the long-term incentive program was amended to allow Restricted Shares granted after January 1, 2016 to employees who retire and have achieved at least 55 years of age and 10 years of service to continue to vest over the original vesting period ("55/10 Provision"). ~~Until the second quarter~~As of ~~2017, no previous stock options were outstanding. On May 4, 2017,~~September 30, 2018, 114,943 stock options were ~~granted~~outstanding, with a grant date fair value of $2.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately ~~three~~two years. No stock options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to 114,943 stock options granted for the same period in 2017. No stock options vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

Restricted Shares – Awards of Restricted Shares are valued at the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant. The unearned compensation is amortized to compensation expense over the vesting period of the restricted shares, except for awards related to the 55/10 Provision which are expensed in the period granted. We had unearned compensation of ~~$20.6~~$30.7 million and ~~$15.2~~$16.7 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately one ~~years.~~year. These amounts will be recognized into net earnings in prospective periods as the awards vest. The total fair value of Restricted Shares vested ~~during~~was $0.2 million for both the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016 was $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively.~~2017. The total fair value of Restricted Shares vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 ~~and 2016~~ was ~~$28.1~~$14.0 million and ~~$38.7~~$28.1 million, respectively.

We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $4.4 million ($5.7 million pre-tax) and $3.0 million ($4.6 ~~million pre-tax) and $3.9 million ($6.0~~ million pre-tax) for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. We recorded stock-based compensation expense of $10.9 million ($14.1 million pre-tax) and $13.4 million ($20.3 ~~million pre-tax) and $19.6 million ($30.0~~ million pre-tax) for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Performance-based shares granted in 2015 did not vest due to unachievement of performance targets resulting in 100,033 forfeited shares and ~~2016, respectively.~~a $5.4 million reduction of stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information regarding Restricted Shares:


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
	Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Number of unvested shares:
Outstanding - January 1, 2017	1,259,275		$	50.77
Outstanding - January 1, 2018					1,203,852		$	47.10
Granted	697,832		49.81		918,782		44.14
Vested	(473,426	)	59.38		(302,065	)	46.45
Canceled	(207,618	)	48.00
Outstanding as of September 30, 2017	1,276,063		$	47.50
Forfeited					(265,591	)	49.55
Outstanding as of September 30, 2018					1,554,978		$	45.06

Unvested Restricted Shares outstanding as of September 30, ~~2017, includes~~2018 included approximately ~~888,000~~766,000 units with performance-based vesting provisions. Performance-based units are issuable in common stock and vest upon the achievement of pre-defined performance targets. Performance-based units granted prior to 2017 have performance targets based on our average annual return on net assets over a three-year period as compared with the same measure for a defined peer group for the same period. Performance-based units granted in 2017 and 2018 have performance targets based on our average return on invested capital and our total shareholder return ("TSR") over a three-year ~~period as compared with the same measures for a defined peer group for the same~~ period. Most units were granted in three annual grants since January 1, ~~2015~~2016 and have a vesting percentage between 0% and 200% depending on the achievement of the specific performance targets. Except for shares granted under the 55/10 Provision, compensation expense is recognized ratably over a cliff-vesting period of 36 months, based on the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant, as adjusted for actual forfeitures. During the performance period, earned and unearned compensation expense is adjusted based on changes in the expected achievement of the performance targets for all performance-based units granted except for the TSR-based units. Vesting provisions range from 0 to approximately ~~1,701,000~~1,531,000 shares based on performance targets. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we estimate vesting of approximately ~~663,000~~ 613,000shares based on expected achievement of performance targets.

~~Table of Contents~~


5.	Derivative Instruments and Hedges

Our risk management and foreign currency derivatives and hedging policy specifies the conditions under which we may enter into derivative contracts. See Notes 1 and 67 to our consolidated financial statements included in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report and Note 7 of this Quarterly Report for additional information on our derivatives. We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge our cash flow risks associated with transactions denominated in currencies other than the local currency of the operation engaging in the transaction.

During the second quarter of 2017, we discontinued our program to designate forward exchange contracts. The discontinuance of this program had no impact on our financial position as of September 30, 2017. Foreign exchange contracts with third parties ~~not designated as hedging instruments~~ had a notional value of ~~$237.6~~$266.6 million and ~~$393.2~~$235.6 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the length of foreign exchange contracts currently in place ranged from ~~2 days~~one day to 2024 months.

We are exposed to risk from credit-related losses resulting from nonperformance by counterparties to our financial instruments. We perform credit evaluations of our counterparties under foreign exchange contracts agreements and expect all counterparties to meet their obligations. We have not experienced credit losses from our counterparties.

The fair values of foreign exchange contracts are summarized below:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Current derivative assets	$	2,526	$	682	$	778	$	2,489
Noncurrent derivative assets	173		—		13		177
Current derivative liabilities	1,172		6,878		2,271		284
Noncurrent derivative liabilities	42		355		68		56

Current and noncurrent derivative assets are reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other and other assets, net, respectively. Current and noncurrent derivative liabilities are reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets in accrued liabilities and retirement obligations and other liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

The impact of net changes in the fair values of foreign exchange contracts are summarized below:


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in thousands)	2017		2016			2017		2016		2018			2017		2018			2017
Gain (loss) recognized in income	$	548	$	(774	)	$	219	$	5,587
(Loss) gain recognized in income										$	(1,157	)	$	548	$	(2,384	)	$	219

Gains and losses recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of income for foreign exchange contracts are classified as other ~~(expense) income,~~expense, net.

In March 2015, we designated €255.7 million of our €500.0 million Euro senior notes discussed in Note 6 as a net investment hedge of our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency. We used the spot method to measure the effectiveness of our net investment hedge. Under this method, for each reporting period, the change in the carrying value of the Euro senior notes due to remeasurement of the effective portion is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and the remaining change in the carrying value of the ineffective portion, if any, is recognized in other expense, net in our condensed consolidated statement of income. We evaluate the effectiveness of our net investment hedge on a prospective basis at the beginning of each quarter. We did not record any ineffectiveness for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

~~Table of Contents~~


6.	Debt

Debt, including capital lease obligations, consisted of:


	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages)	2017		2016		2018		2017
1.25% EUR Senior Notes due March 17, 2022, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $5,558 and $5,748	$	585,042	$	519,902
4.00% USD Senior Notes due November 15, 2023, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $2,687 and $2,972	297,313		297,028
3.50% USD Senior Notes due September 15, 2022, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $3,386 and $3,848	496,614		496,152
Term Loan Facility, interest rate of 2.58% at September 30, 2017 and 2.25% at December 31, 2016, net of debt issuance costs of $694 and $745	179,306		224,255
1.25% EUR Senior Notes due March 17, 2022, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $4,265 and $5,335					$	576,135	$	594,465
4.00% USD Senior Notes due November 15, 2023, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $2,293 and $2,590					297,707		297,410
3.50% USD Senior Notes due September 15, 2022, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $2,751 and $3,230					497,249		496,770
Term Loan Facility, interest rate of 3.89% at September 30, 2018 and 3.19% at December 31, 2017, net of debt issuance costs of $321 and $585					119,679		164,415
Capital lease obligations and other borrowings	28,417		33,286		13,245		22,197
Debt and capital lease obligations	1,586,692		1,570,623		1,504,015		1,575,257
Less amounts due within one year	80,635		85,365		67,269		75,599
Total debt due after one year	$	1,506,057	$	1,485,258	$	1,436,746	$	1,499,658

Senior Credit Facility

As discussed in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report, our credit agreement provides for an initial $400.0 million term loan (“Term Loan Facility”) and a ~~$1.0 billion~~$800.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility” and, together with the Term Loan Facility, the “Senior Credit Facility”) with a maturity date of October 14, 2020. On June 30, 2017, we amended our existing Senior Credit Facility. The amendment, among other changes, includes the following: (i) a decrease of the Revolving Credit Facility commitment from $1.0 billion to $800 million, (ii) an increase of the leverage ratio from 3.50 to 4.00 times debt to total Consolidated EBITDA, through June 30, 2019, with a step-down to 3.75 for any fiscal quarter ending after July 1, 2019, (iii) the addition of a new pricing level on our senior unsecured long-term debt ratings for Ba2/BB, with an increase in interest rate margin for LIBOR loans to 2.00% and for base rate loans to 1.00% and (iv) a revision to the restrictions on the ability to incur debt by decreasing the maximum principal amount of priority debt allowed from 15% to 7.5% of the consolidated tangible assets and a decrease on the maximum amount of receivables that could be securitized from $200 million to $100 million. All other material terms and conditions of the Senior Credit Facility remained unchanged as discussed in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report.

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, we had no amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility. We had outstanding letters of credit of ~~$91.8~~$74.8 million and ~~$102.6~~$94.8 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, which ~~reduced~~together with financial covenant limitations based on the terms of our Senior Credit Facility, contributed to the reduction of our borrowing capacity to ~~$708.2~~$416.5 million and ~~$553.5~~$644.8 million, respectively. Our compliance with applicable financial covenants under the Senior Credit Facility is tested quarterly, and we complied with all applicable covenants as of September 30, ~~2017.~~

2018.

We may prepay loans under our Senior Credit Facility in whole or in part, without premium or penalty, at any time. A commitment fee, which is payable quarterly on the daily unused portions of the Senior Credit Facility, was ~~0.150%~~0.20% (per annum) during the period ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we made scheduled repayments of $45.0 million under our Term Loan Facility. We have scheduled repayments of $15.0 million due in each of the next four quarters on our Term Loan Facility.

Table of Contents


7.	Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models may be applied. Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized by hierarchical levels based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Recurring fair value measurements are limited to investments in derivative instruments. The fair value measurements of our derivative instruments are determined using models that maximize the use of the observable market inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies, and are classified as Level II under the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of our derivatives are included in Note 5.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our financial instruments are presented at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, with the exception of our long-term debt. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt, excluding the Senior Notes, approximates the carrying value and is classified as Level II under the fair value hierarchy. The carrying value of our debt is included in Note 6. The estimated fair value of our Senior Notes at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$1,400.1~~$1,364.1 million compared to the carrying value of ~~$1,379.0~~$1,371.1 million. The estimated fair value of the Senior Notes is based on Level I quoted market rates. The carrying amounts of our other financial instruments (e.g., cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net, accounts payable and short-term debt) approximated fair value due to their short-term nature at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.


8.	Inventories

Inventories, net consisted of the following:


	September 30,			December 31,			September 30,			December 31,
(Amounts in thousands)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Raw materials	$	374,154		$	348,012		$	326,408		$	358,827
Work in process	682,522			629,766			220,789			548,250
Finished goods	208,465			206,086			182,668			215,849
Less: Progress billings	(233,040		)	(216,783		)	—			(160,044		)
Less: Excess and obsolete reserve	(80,503		)	(69,391		)	(74,213		)	(78,609		)
Inventories, net	$	951,598		$	897,690		$	655,652		$	884,273

During the second quarter of ~~2017~~2018, we recorded a ~~$16.9~~$7.7 million inventory charge ~~for costs incurred~~ related to ~~a contract to supply oil~~the divestiture of two IPD locations and ~~gas platform equipment to an end user in Latin America. This charge was primarily~~ related ~~to our IPD reporting segment~~product lines, and resulted in a decrease to finished goods. Refer to Note 3 of this Quarterly Report for further discussion.

As a result of our adoption of the New Revenue Standard as of January 1, 2018, progress billings and work in process amounts associated with contracts accounted under the over time method were either recognized as COS or reclassified into contract assets, net or contract liabilities. Refer to Note 2 of this Quarterly Report for a discussion on our adoption of the New Revenue Standard.

1319

Table of Contents


9.	Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation of net earnings of Flowserve Corporation and weighted average shares for calculating net earnings per common share. Earnings per weighted average common share outstanding was calculated as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	2017		2016			2018		2017
Net earnings (loss) of Flowserve Corporation	$	47,605	$	(15,841	)
Net earnings of Flowserve Corporation						$	28,205	$	47,605
Dividends on restricted shares not expected to vest	—		—			—		—
Earnings (loss) attributable to common and participating shareholders	$	47,605	$	(15,841	)
Earnings attributable to common and participating shareholders						$	28,205	$	47,605
Weighted average shares:
Common stock	130,681		130,299			130,823		130,681
Participating securities	79		—			20		79
Denominator for basic earnings per common share	130,760		130,299			130,843		130,760
Effect of potentially dilutive securities	636		—			507		636
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share	131,396		130,299			131,350		131,396
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.36	$	(0.12	)	$	0.22	$	0.36
Diluted	0.36		(0.12		)	0.21		0.36


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Net earnings of Flowserve Corporation	$	108,534	$	72,398	$	56,568	$	108,534
Dividends on restricted shares not expected to vest	—		5		—		—
Earnings attributable to common and participating shareholders	$	108,534	$	72,403	$	56,568	$	108,534
Weighted average shares:
Common stock	130,574		130,087		130,784		130,574
Participating securities	111		298		32		111
Denominator for basic earnings per common share	130,685		130,385		130,816		130,685
Effect of potentially dilutive securities	653		522		408		653
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share	131,338		130,907		131,224		131,338
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.83	$	0.56	$	0.43	$	0.83
Diluted	0.83		0.55		0.43		0.83

Diluted earnings per share above is based upon the weighted average number of shares as determined for basic earnings per share plus shares potentially issuable in conjunction with stock options and Restricted Shares. ~~As a result of the net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016, we excluded 803,251 of unvested Restricted Shares from the calculation of diluted EPS due to their anti-dilutive effect.~~


10.	Legal Matters and Contingencies

Asbestos-Related Claims

We are a defendant in a substantial number of lawsuits that seek to recover damages for personal injury allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or distributed by our heritage companies in the past. While the overall number of asbestos-related claims has generally declined in recent years, there can be no assurance that this trend will continue, or that the average cost per claim will not further increase. Asbestos-containing materials incorporated into any such products were encapsulated and used as internal components of process equipment, and we do not believe that any significant emission of asbestos fibers occurred during the use of this equipment.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our practice is to vigorously contest and resolve these claims, and we have been successful in resolving a majority of claims with little or no payment. Historically, a high percentage of resolved claims have been covered by applicable insurance or indemnities from other companies, and we believe that a substantial majority of existing claims should continue to be covered by insurance or indemnities. Accordingly, we have recorded a liability for our estimate of the most likely settlement of asserted claims and a related receivable from insurers or other companies for our estimated recovery, to the extent we believe that the

Table of Contents

amounts of recovery are probable and not otherwise in dispute. While unfavorable rulings, judgments or settlement terms regarding these claims could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, we currently believe the likelihood is remote.

Additionally, we have claims pending against certain insurers that, if resolved more favorably than reflected in the recorded receivables, would result in discrete gains in the applicable quarter. We are currently unable to estimate the impact, if any, of unasserted asbestos-related claims, although future claims would also be subject to then existing indemnities and insurance coverage.

United Nations Oil-for-Food Program

In mid-2006, the French authorities began an investigation of over 170 French companies, of which one of our French subsidiaries was included, concerning suspected inappropriate activities conducted in connection with the United Nations Oil for Food Program. As previously disclosed, the French investigation of our French subsidiary was formally opened in the first quarter of 2010, and our French subsidiary filed a formal response with the French court. In July 2012, the French court ruled against our procedural motions to challenge the constitutionality of the charges and quash the indictment. Hearings occurred on April 1-2, 2015, and the Company presented its defense and closing arguments. On June 18, 2015, the French court issued its ruling dismissing the case against the Company and the other defendants. However, on July 1, 2015, the French prosecutor lodged an appeal and we anticipate that the hearing for the appeal will be held in 2018. We currently do not expect to incur additional case resolution costs of a material amount in this matter. However, if the French authorities ultimately take enforcement action against our French subsidiary regarding its investigation, we may be subject to monetary and non-monetary penalties, which we currently do not believe will have a material adverse financial impact on our company.

Other

We are currently involved as a potentially responsible party at five former public waste disposal sites in various stages of evaluation or remediation. The projected cost of remediation at these sites, as well as our alleged "fair share" allocation, will remain uncertain until all studies have been completed and the parties have either negotiated an amicable resolution or the matter has been judicially resolved. At each site, there are many other parties who have similarly been identified. Many of the other parties identified are financially strong and solvent companies that appear able to pay their share of the remediation costs. Based on our information about the waste disposal practices at these sites and the environmental regulatory process in general, we believe that it is likely that ultimate remediation liability costs for each site will be apportioned among all liable parties, including site owners and waste transporters, according to the volumes and/or toxicity of the wastes shown to have been disposed of at the sites. We believe that our financial exposure for existing disposal sites will not be materially in excess of accrued reserves.

As previously disclosed in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report, we terminated an employee of an overseas subsidiary after uncovering actions that violated our Code of Business Conduct and may have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We completed our internal investigation into the matter, self-reported the potential violation to the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and the SEC, and continue to cooperate with the DOJ and SEC. We previously received a subpoena from the SEC requesting additional information and documentation related to the matter and have completed our response to the subpoena. We currently believe that this matter will not have a material adverse financial impact on the Company, but there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subjected to monetary penalties and additional costs.

We are also a defendant in a number of other lawsuits, including product liability claims, that are insured, subject to the applicable deductibles, arising in the ordinary course of business, and we are also involved in other uninsured routine litigation incidental to our business. We currently believe none of such litigation, either individually or in the aggregate, is material to our business, operations or overall financial condition. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and resolutions or dispositions of claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise could have an adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the reporting period in which any such resolution or disposition occurs.

Although none of the aforementioned potential liabilities can be quantified with absolute certainty except as otherwise indicated above, we have established reserves covering exposures relating to contingencies, to the extent believed to be reasonably estimable and probable based on past experience and available facts. While additional exposures beyond these reserves could exist, they currently cannot be estimated. We will continue to evaluate and update the reserves as necessary and appropriate.

Table of Contents


11.	Retirement and Postretirement Benefits

Components of the net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 were as follows:


	U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Postretirement Medical Benefits						U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Postretirement Medical Benefits
(Amounts in millions)	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Service cost	$	5.6		$	5.6		$	1.7		$	1.8		$	—		$	—		$	5.5		$	5.6		$	1.7		$	1.7		$	—		$	—
Interest cost	4.3			4.8			2.2			2.9			0.3			0.3			3.9			4.3			2.2			2.2			0.2			0.3
Expected return on plan assets	(6.2		)	(6.0		)	(2.1		)	(2.7		)	—			—			(6.4		)	(6.2		)	(2.1		)	(2.1		)	—			—
Amortization of prior service cost	—			0.2			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Amortization of unrecognized net loss (gain)	1.5			1.2			0.9			1.3			(0.1		)	(0.1		)	1.3			1.5			0.9			0.9			(0.2		)	(0.1		)
Net periodic cost recognized	$	5.2		$	5.8		$	2.7		$	3.3		$	0.2		$	0.2		$	4.3		$	5.2		$	2.7		$	2.7		$	—		$	0.2

Components of the net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits for the nine months ~~months~~ ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 were as follows:


	U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Postretirement Medical Benefits						U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Non-U.S. Defined Benefit Plans						Postretirement Medical Benefits
(Amounts in millions)	2017			2016			2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Service cost	$	16.7		$	16.9		$	5.1		$	5.3		$	—		$	—		$	16.6		$	16.7		$	5.3		$	5.1		$	—		$	—
Interest cost	12.7			14.3			6.6			8.8			0.7			0.9			11.8			12.7			6.6			6.6			0.6			0.7
Expected return on plan assets	(18.4		)	(18.0		)	(6.3		)	(8.0		)	—			—			(19.3		)	(18.4		)	(6.4		)	(6.3		)	—			—
Amortization of prior service cost	0.1			0.4			—			—			0.1			0.1			0.1			0.1			—			—			0.1			0.1
Amortization of unrecognized net loss (gain)	4.5			3.7			2.6			3.7			(0.2		)	(0.3		)	4.1			4.5			2.7			2.6			(0.6		)	(0.2		)
Net periodic cost recognized	$	15.6		$	17.3		$	8.0		$	9.8		$	0.6		$	0.7		$	13.3		$	15.6		$	8.2		$	8.0		$	0.1		$	0.6

Effective January 1, 2018 we adopted ASU No. 2017-07, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost." Refer to Note 1 included in this Quarterly Report for a discussion on the adoption of the standard.

The components of net periodic cost for retirement and postretirement benefits other than service costs are included in other expense, net in our condensed consolidated statement of income.


12.	Shareholders’ Equity

Dividends – Generally, our dividend date-of-record is in the last month of the quarter, and the dividend is paid the following month. Any subsequent dividends will be reviewed by our Board of Directors and declared in its discretion dependent on its assessment of our financial situation and business outlook at the applicable time. Dividends paid per share were $0.19 for the three months ending September 30, 2018 and 2017 and $0.57 for the nine months ending September 30, 2018 and 2017. Dividends paid for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 were $24.9 million and $24.8 million, respectively, and $74.5 million and $74.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Share Repurchase Program – On November 13, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a $500.0 million share repurchase authorization. Our share repurchase program does not have an expiration date, and we reserve the right to limit or terminate the repurchase program at ~~anytime~~any time without notice. We had no repurchases of shares of our outstanding common stock for both of the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018, we had $160.7 million of remaining capacity under our current share repurchase program.

Table of Contents


13.	Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Act”), which significantly changed U.S. tax law. The Act, among other things, lowered the Company’s U.S. statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, while imposing a deemed repatriation tax on deferred foreign income and implementing a modified territorial tax system. While the Act provides for a territorial tax system, beginning in 2018, it provides for two new anti-base erosion provisions, the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provision and the base-erosion and anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”) provision which effectively creates a new minimum tax on certain future foreign earnings.

The Company included reasonable estimates of the income tax effects in applying the provisions of the Act in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC Topic 740) and following the guidance in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”). As a result, the impacts from the Act may differ, primarily related to deemed repatriated earnings and associated withholding taxes, from these provisional amounts, possibly materially, due to, among other things, additional analysis, changes from interpretations enacted and assumptions the Company has made, additional regulatory guidance that may be issued, and actions the Company may take as a result of the Act. Due to the timing of the Act and the substantial changes it brings, SAB 118 provides registrants a measurement period to report the impact of the new U.S. tax law. The financial reporting impact of the Act is expected to be completed no later than the fourth quarter of 2018. The impacts of these changes were reflected in the 2017 provisional tax expense, as discussed in Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2017 Annual Report. The Company has elected to account for the GILTI provision in the period in which it is incurred.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018, we earned $44.4 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $14.9 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 33.6%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we earned $97.7 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $37.0 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 37.9%. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, including losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was provided.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, we earned $68.4 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $19.6 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 28.7%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we earned $196.1 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $85.8 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 43.8%. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was provided and taxes related to the sale of the Gestra and Vogt businesses.

~~For the three months ended September 30, 2016,~~ ~~we incurred a pre-tax loss of~~ ~~$12.2 million~~ ~~and provided for income taxes of~~ ~~$2.8 million~~ ~~resulting in an effective tax rate of negative~~ 23.2%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we earned $123.1 million before taxes and provided for income taxes of $49.5 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 40.2%. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, tax impacts from our Realignment Programs and losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was provided.

~~Table of Contents~~

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$3.1~~$3.2 million from December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. With limited exception, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits for years through ~~2015,~~2016, state and local income tax audits for years through ~~2011~~2012 or non-U.S. income tax audits for years through ~~2010.~~2011. We are currently under examination for various years in Austria, Canada, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, the U.S. and Venezuela.

It is reasonably possible that within the next 12 months the effective tax rate will be impacted by the resolution of some or all of the matters audited by various taxing authorities. It is also reasonably possible that we will have the statute of limitations close in various taxing jurisdictions within the next 12 months. As such, we estimate we could record a reduction in our tax expense of approximately $8$14 million within the next 12 months.

Table of Contents


14.	Segment Information

The following is a summary of the financial information of the reportable segments reconciled to the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements:


Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018																Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division			Industrial Product Division			Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers	$	416,031		$	180,347		$	287,002	$	883,380	$	—		$	883,380	$	456,833	$	190,465		$	305,418	$	952,716	$	—		$	952,716
Intersegment sales	8,157			9,388			686		18,231		(18,231		)	—		9,377		8,673			761		18,811		(18,811		)	—
Segment operating income (loss)	51,782			(3,551		)	48,497		96,728		(22,709		)	74,019		57,416		(2,460		)	56,430		111,386		(49,195		)	62,191

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017(1)																Three Months Ended September 30, 2017(1)
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division			Industrial Product Division			Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers	$	451,354		$	196,172		$	298,413	$	945,939	$	—		$	945,939	$	416,031	$	180,347		$	287,002	$	883,380	$	—		$	883,380
Intersegment sales	7,098			7,126			937		15,161		(15,161		)	—		8,157		9,388			686		18,231		(18,231		)	—
Segment operating (loss) income (1)	(21,982		)	(17,062		)	53,717		14,673		(14,561		)	112
Segment operating income (loss)																52,078		(3,500		)	48,827		97,405		(22,612		)	74,793

(1) Prior period is presented in accordance with Topic 605.



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers	$	1,384,799	$	574,007		$	886,992	$	2,845,798	$	—		$	2,845,798
Intersegment sales	29,773		28,977			2,890		61,640		(61,640		)	—
Segment operating income (loss)	147,830		(25,181		)	136,741		259,390		(105,063		)	154,327

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017(1)
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers	$	1,252,541	$	533,302		$	840,919	$	2,626,762	$	—		$	2,626,762
Intersegment sales	24,022		26,640			2,608		53,270		(53,270		)	—
Segment operating income (loss)	107,780		(45,760		)	255,086		317,106		(64,767		)	252,339

(1) Prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the correction of certain immaterial errors. See Note 2 for more information. Of the $2.9 million adjustment to consolidated operating (loss) income, $3.2 million related to the EPD segment, $(1.4) million related to the IPD segment, $0.9 million related to the FCD segment and $0.2 million related to Eliminations and All Other.is presented in accordance with Topic 605.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands) Engineered Product Division Industrial Product Division Flow Control Division Subtotal–Reportable Segments Eliminations and All Other Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers $ 1,252,541
$ 533,302
$ 840,919
$ 2,626,762
$ —
$ 2,626,762
Intersegment sales 24,022
26,640
2,608
53,270
(53,270 ) —
Segment operating income (loss) 106,902
(46,016 ) 254,120
315,006
(65,036 ) 249,970

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands) Engineered Product Division Industrial Product Division Flow Control Division Subtotal–Reportable Segments Eliminations and All Other Consolidated Total
Sales to external customers $ 1,418,434
$ 591,008
$ 910,111
$ 2,919,553
$ —
$ 2,919,553
Intersegment sales 25,763
24,772
5,410
55,945
(55,945 ) —
Segment operating income (loss)(1) 97,402
(10,434 ) 140,541
227,509
(62,702 ) 164,807

1724

Table of Contents

(1) Prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the correction of certain immaterial errors. See Note 2 for more information. Of the $(4.8) million adjustment to consolidated operating income (loss), $(1.1) million related to the EPD segment, $(4.3) million related to the IPD segment, $0.4 million related to the FCD segment and $0.2 million related to Eliminations and All Other.


15.	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL"), net of tax for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


	2017												2016												2018												2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)
Balance - July 1	$	(415,506	)	$	(137,188	)	$	(1,154	)	$	(553,848	)	$	(408,605	)	$	(114,525	)	$	(2,255	)	$	(525,385	)	$	(426,327	)	$	(110,248	)	$	(965	)	$	(537,540	)	$	(415,506	)	$	(137,188	)	$	(1,154	)	$	(553,848	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	17,674			(2,004		)	12			15,682			(15,587		)	1,952			39			(13,596		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications																									(19,669		)	771			52			(18,846		)	17,674			(2,004		)	12			15,682
Amounts reclassified from AOCL	—			1,560			—			1,560			—			1,767			521			2,288			—			1,828			—			1,828			—			1,560			—			1,560
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	17,674			(444		)	12			17,242			(15,587		)	3,719			560			(11,308		)
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income																									(19,669		)	2,599			52			(17,018		)	17,674			(444		)	12			17,242
Balance - September 30	$	(397,832	)	$	(137,632	)	$	(1,142	)	$	(536,606	)	$	(424,192	)	$	(110,806	)	$	(1,695	)	$	(536,693	)	$	(445,996	)	$	(107,649	)	$	(913	)	$	(554,558	)	$	(397,832	)	$	(137,632	)	$	(1,142	)	$	(536,606	)

(1) Includes foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests of ~~$3.9~~$4.7 million ~~and $3.5 million at July 1, 2017 and 2016, respectively,~~ and $3.9 million for July 1, 2018 and ~~$3.5~~2017, respectively, and $5.0 million ~~for~~and $3.9 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Includes net investment hedge gains of $1.5 million and losses of $6.3 ~~million and $2.2~~ million, net of deferred taxes, for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

The following table presents the reclassifications out of AOCL:


		Three Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in thousands)	Affected line item in the statement of income	2017(1)			2016 (1)			Affected line item in the statement of income	2018(1)			2017(1)

Cash flow hedging activity
Foreign exchange contracts
	Sales	$	—		$	(717	)
	Tax benefit	—			196
	Net of tax	$	—		$	(521	)

Pension and other postretirement effects
Amortization of actuarial losses(2)		$	(2,284	)	$	(2,395	)	Other (expense) income, net	$	(2,061	)	$	(2,284	)
Prior service costs(2)		(57		)	(153		)	Other (expense) income, net	(78		)	(57		)
	Tax benefit	781			781			Tax benefit	311			781
	Net of tax	$	(1,560	)	$	(1,767	)	Net of tax	$	(1,828	)	$	(1,560	)

(1) Amounts in parentheses indicate decreases to income. None of the reclass amounts have a noncontrolling interest component.

(2) These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 11 for additional details.

1825

Table of Contents

The following table presents the changes in AOCL, net of tax for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


	2017												2016												2018												2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)			Foreign currency translation items(1)			Pension and other post-retirement effects			Cash flow hedging activity			Total(1)
Balance - January 1	$	(483,609	)	$	(136,530	)	$	(1,238	)	$	(621,377	)	$	(411,615	)	$	(120,461	)	$	(3,458	)	$	(535,534	)	$	(384,779	)	$	(115,755	)	$	(1,090	)	$	(501,624	)	$	(483,609	)	$	(136,530	)	$	(1,238	)	$	(621,377	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	85,225			(5,818		)	73			79,480			(12,577		)	4,330			633			(7,614		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications																									(61,217		)	2,536			177			(58,504		)	85,225			(5,818		)	73			79,480
Amounts reclassified from AOCL	552			4,716			23			5,291			—			5,325			1,130			6,455			—			5,570			—			5,570			552			4,716			23			5,291
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	85,777			(1,102		)	96			84,771			(12,577		)	9,655			1,763			(1,159		)
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income																									(61,217		)	8,106			177			(52,934		)	85,777			(1,102		)	96			84,771
Balance - September 30	$	(397,832	)	$	(137,632	)	$	(1,142	)	$	(536,606	)	$	(424,192	)	$	(110,806	)	$	(1,695	)	$	(536,693	)	$	(445,996	)	$	(107,649	)	$	(913	)	$	(554,558	)	$	(397,832	)	$	(137,632	)	$	(1,142	)	$	(536,606	)

(1) Includes foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests of ~~$3.4~~$3.8 million and ~~$2.7~~$3.4 million at January 1, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and ~~2016~~$5.0 million and $3.9 million ~~and $3.5 million for~~at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Includes net investment hedge losses of ~~$19.6~~$19.8 million and ~~$10.3~~$19.6 million,⁽²⁾ net of deferred taxes, for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.

~~(2) Previously disclosed as a loss of $6.1 million in 2016. No incremental impact on our consolidated financial condition or result of operations.~~

The following table presents the reclassifications out of AOCL:


		Nine Months Ended September 30,							Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in thousands)	Affected line item in the statement of income	2017(1)			2016 (1)			Affected line item in the statement of income	2018(1)			2017(1)
Foreign currency translation items
Release of cumulative translation adjustments due to sale of business(2)	Gain on sale of business	$	(552	)	$	—
	Tax benefit	—			—
	Net of tax	$	(552	)	$	—

Cash flow hedging activity
Foreign exchange contracts
	Sales	$	(30	)	$	(1,531	)
Release of cumulative translation adjustments due to sale of business								Gain on sale of business	$	—		$	(552	)
	Tax benefit	7			401			Tax benefit	—			—
	Net of tax	$	(23	)	$	(1,130	)	Net of tax	$	—		$	(552	)

Pension and other postretirement effects
Amortization of actuarial losses(2)		$	(6,885	)	$	(7,184	)	Other expense, net	$	(6,231	)	$	(6,885	)
Prior service costs(2)		(172		)	(458		)	Other expense, net	(237		)	(172		)
	Tax benefit	2,341			2,317			Tax benefit	898			2,341
	Net of tax	$	(4,716	)	$	(5,325	)	Net of tax	$	(5,570	)	$	(4,716	)

(1) Amounts in parentheses indicate decreases to income. None of the reclass amounts have a noncontrolling interest component.

(2) These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 11 for additional details.

~~Table of Contents~~


16.	Realignment and Transformation Programs

~~In the first quarter of 2015, we initiated a realignment program ("R1 Realignment Program") to reduce and optimize certain non-strategic QRCs and manufacturing facilities.~~ In the second quarter of 2018, we launched and committed resources to our Flowserve 2.0 Transformation ("Flowserve 2.0 Transformation"), a program designed to transform our business model to drive operational excellence, reduce complexity, accelerate growth, improve organizational health and better leverage our existing global platform. We anticipate that the Flowserve 2.0 Transformation will result in restructuring charges, non-restructuring charges and other related transformation expenses (primarily professional services, project management and related travel expenses). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, we incurred Flowserve 2.0 Transformation related expenses of $24.0 million and $27.4 million, respectively, primarily consisting of professional services and project management costs recorded in SG&A. We are currently evaluating the total investment in the various initiatives associated with this program.

In 2015 we initiated ~~a second~~ realignment ~~program ("~~programs consisting of R1 Realignment Program related to the SIHI acquisition and R2 Realignment ~~Program")~~Program to better align costs and improve long-term efficiency, including ~~further~~ manufacturing optimization through the consolidation of facilities, a reduction in our workforce ~~the transfer of activities from high-cost regions to lower-cost facilities~~ and ~~the~~ divestiture of certain non-strategic ~~assets.~~assets (the “Realignment Programs”).

Table of Contents

These Realignment Programs have been substantially completed, with the final projects targeted to complete in late 2018. We estimate total investment in these programs of approximately $360 million and anticipate we will incur most of the remaining charges by the end of 2018. The R1 Realignment ~~Program and the R2 Realignment Program (collectively the "Realignment Programs")~~Programs consist of both restructuring and non-restructuring charges. Restructuring charges represent costs associated with the relocation or reorganization of certain business activities and facility closures and include related severance costs. Non-restructuring charges are primarily employee severance associated with workforce reductions to reduce redundancies. Expenses are primarily reported in COS or SG&A, as applicable, in our condensed consolidated statements of income. We anticipate a total investment in these programs of approximately $360 million, including projects in process or under final evaluation. We anticipate to incur the remaining charges throughout the remainder of 2017 and into 2018.

Generally, the aforementioned charges will be paid in cash, except for asset write-downs, which are non-cash charges. The following is a summary of total charges, net of adjustments, related to the Realignment ~~Programs:~~Programs and Flowserve 2.0 Transformation charges:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017																Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division			Industrial Product Division			Flow Control Division			Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total		EPD			IPD			FCD			Subtotal–Reportable Segments			Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Realignment Charges
Restructuring Charges
COS	$	5,252		$	19		$	5,396		$	10,667	$	—		$	10,667	$	3,115		$	372		$	918		$	4,405		$	—	$	4,405
SG&A	831			28			364			1,223		(8		)	1,215		143			(348		)	1			(204		)	9		(195		)
Income tax expense	1,000			—			—			1,000		—			1,000
	$	7,083		$	47		$	5,760		$	12,890	$	(8	)	$	12,882	$	3,258		$	24		$	919		$	4,201		$	9	$	4,210
Non-Restructuring Charges
COS	$	1,793		$	2,002		$	(242	)	$	3,553	$	—		$	3,553	$	4,055		$	378		$	(630	)	$	3,803		$	—	$	3,803
SG&A	(113		)	(407		)	658			138		1,218			1,356		(801		)	(17		)	225			(593		)	3,707		3,114
	$	1,680		$	1,595		$	416		$	3,691	$	1,218		$	4,909	$	3,254		$	361		$	(405	)	$	3,210		$	3,707	$	6,917
Total Realignment Charges
COS	$	7,045		$	2,021		$	5,154		$	14,220	$	—		$	14,220	$	7,170		$	750		$	288		$	8,208		$	—	$	8,208
SG&A	718			(379		)	1,022			1,361		1,210			$	2,571	(658		)	(365		)	226			(797		)	3,716		$	2,919
Income tax expense	1,000			—			—			1,000		—			$	1,000
Total	$	8,763		$	1,642		$	6,176		$	16,581	$	1,210		$	17,791	$	6,512		$	385		$	514		$	7,411		$	3,716	$	11,127

Transformation Charges
SG&A																	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	23,986	$	23,986
																	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	23,986	$	23,986

Total Realignment and Transformation Charges
COS																	$	7,170		$	750		$	288		$	8,208		$	—	$	8,208
SG&A																	(658		)	(365		)	226			(797		)	27,702		26,905
Total																	$	6,512		$	385		$	514		$	7,411		$	27,702	$	35,113

2027

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016															Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division		Industrial Product Division			Flow Control Division			Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total		EPD			IPD			FCD			Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Restructuring Charges
COS	$	5,711	$	15,599		$	796		$	22,106	$	—		$	22,106	$	5,252		$	19		$	5,396		$	10,667	$	—		$	10,667
SG&A	393		3,928			20			4,341		(32		)	4,309		831			28			364			1,223		(8		)	1,215
Income tax expense	2,000		2,800			600			5,400		—			5,400		1,000			—			—			1,000		—			1,000
	$	8,104	$	22,327		$	1,416		$	31,847	$	(32	)	$	31,815	$	7,083		$	47		$	5,760		$	12,890	$	(8	)	$	12,882
Non-Restructuring Charges
COS	$	2,707	$	445		$	(749	)	$	2,403	$	(6	)	$	2,397	$	1,793		$	2,002		$	(242	)	$	3,553	$	—		$	3,553
SG&A	1,010		(344		)	623			1,289		1,385			2,674		(113		)	(407		)	658			138		1,218			1,356
	$	3,717	$	101		$	(126	)	$	3,692	$	1,379		$	5,071	$	1,680		$	1,595		$	416		$	3,691	$	1,218		$	4,909
Total Realignment Charges
COS	$	8,418	$	16,044		$	47		$	24,509	$	(6	)	$	24,503	$	7,045		$	2,021		$	5,154		$	14,220	$	—		$	14,220
SG&A	1,403		3,584			643			5,630		1,353			$	6,983	718			(379		)	1,022			1,361		1,210			$	2,571
Income tax expense	2,000		2,800			600			5,400		—			$	5,400	1,000			—			—			1,000		—			$	1,000
Total	$	11,821	$	22,428		$	1,290		$	35,539	$	1,347		$	36,886	$	8,763		$	1,642		$	6,176		$	16,581	$	1,210		$	17,791



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD			Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Realignment Charges
Restructuring Charges
COS	$	8,552	$	1,980	$	3,370		$	13,902	$	—	$	13,902
SG&A	562		355		345			1,262		37		1,299
	$	9,114	$	2,335	$	3,715		$	15,164	$	37	$	15,201
Non-Restructuring Charges
COS	$	15,190	$	2,548	$	(47	)	$	17,691	$	—	$	17,691
SG&A	2,690		1,088		947			4,725		5,723		10,448
	$	17,880	$	3,636	$	900		$	22,416	$	5,723	$	28,139
Total Realignment Charges
COS	$	23,742	$	4,528	$	3,323		$	31,593	$	—	$	31,593
SG&A	3,252		1,443		1,292			5,987		5,760		11,747
Total	$	26,994	$	5,971	$	4,615		$	37,580	$	5,760	$	43,340

Transformation Charges
SG&A	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	27,352	$	27,352
	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	27,352	$	27,352

Total Realignment and Transformation Charges
COS	$	23,742	$	4,528	$	3,323		$	31,593	$	—	$	31,593
SG&A	3,252		1,443		1,292			5,987		33,112		39,099
Total	$	26,994	$	5,971	$	4,615		$	37,580	$	33,112	$	70,692

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands) Engineered Product Division Industrial Product Division Flow Control Division Subtotal–Reportable Segments Eliminations and All Other Consolidated Total
Restructuring Charges
     COS $ 5,444
$ 6,111
$ 6,575
$ 18,130
$ —
$ 18,130
     SG&A 637
213
(289 ) 561
67
628
     Income tax expense 1,000
—
—
1,000
—
1,000
$ 7,081
$ 6,324
$ 6,286
$ 19,691
$ 67
$ 19,758
Non-Restructuring Charges

     COS $ 6,965
$ 5,818
$ 2,459
$ 15,242
$ —
$ 15,242
     SG&A 7,311
9,968
3,957
21,236
3,772
25,008
$ 14,276
$ 15,786
$ 6,416
$ 36,478
$ 3,772
$ 40,250
Total Realignment Charges
     COS $ 12,409
$ 11,929
$ 9,034
$ 33,372
$ —
$ 33,372
     SG&A 7,948
10,181
3,668
21,797
3,839
25,636
     Income tax expense 1,000
—
—
1,000
—
1,000
Total $ 21,357
$ 22,110
$ 12,702
$ 56,169
$ 3,839
$ 60,008

2128

Table of Contents


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016												Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division		Industrial Product Division		Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD		FCD			Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Restructuring Charges
COS	$	10,566	$	17,709	$	3,083	$	31,358	$	—	$	31,358	$	5,444	$	6,111	$	6,575		$	18,130	$	—	$	18,130
SG&A	9,211		5,717		356		15,284		—		15,284		637		213		(289		)	561		67		628
Income tax expense	2,000		2,800		600		5,400		—		5,400		1,000		—		—			1,000		—		1,000
	$	21,777	$	26,226	$	4,039	$	52,042	$	—	$	52,042	$	7,081	$	6,324	$	6,286		$	19,691	$	67	$	19,758
Non-Restructuring Charges
COS	$	3,844	$	4,729	$	2,970	$	11,543	$	8	$	11,551	$	6,965	$	5,818	$	2,459		$	15,242	$	—	$	15,242
SG&A	1,989		56		2,212		4,257		2,644		6,901		7,311		9,968		3,957			21,236		3,772		25,008
	$	5,833	$	4,785	$	5,182	$	15,800	$	2,652	$	18,452	$	14,276	$	15,786	$	6,416		$	36,478	$	3,772	$	40,250
Total Realignment Charges
COS	$	14,410	$	22,438	$	6,053	$	42,901	$	8	$	42,909	$	12,409	$	11,929	$	9,034		$	33,372	$	—	$	33,372
SG&A	11,200		5,773		2,568		19,541		2,644		22,185		7,948		10,181		3,668			21,797		3,839		25,636
Income tax expense	2,000		2,800		600		5,400		—		5,400		1,000		—		—			1,000		—		1,000
Total	$	27,610	$	31,011	$	9,221	$	67,842	$	2,652	$	70,494	$	21,357	$	22,110	$	12,702		$	56,169	$	3,839	$	60,008

The following is a summary of total inception to date charges, net of adjustments, related to the Realignment Programs:


	Inception to Date												Inception to Date
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division		Industrial Product Division (1)		Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD		FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total
Realignment Charges
Restructuring Charges
COS	$	40,155	$	46,759	$	20,564	$	107,478	$	—	$	107,478	$	51,364	$	49,805	$	26,025	$	127,194	$	—		$	127,194
SG&A	18,454		15,811		9,262		43,527		85		43,612		18,902		17,072		9,442		45,416		316			45,732
Income tax expense(2)	10,400		9,300		1,800		21,500		—		21,500
Income tax expense(1)													10,400		9,300		1,800		21,500		—			21,500
	$	69,009	$	71,870	$	31,626	$	172,505	$	85	$	172,590	$	80,666	$	76,177	$	37,267	$	194,110	$	316		$	194,426
Non-Restructuring Charges
COS	$	23,125	$	20,000	$	14,392	$	57,517	$	8	$	57,525	$	41,613	$	23,537	$	14,820	$	79,970	$	8		$	79,978
SG&A	17,304		18,177		8,796		44,277		8,205		52,482		19,536		19,489		9,111		48,136		15,645			63,781
	$	40,429	$	38,177	$	23,188	$	101,794	$	8,213	$	110,007	$	61,149	$	43,026	$	23,931	$	128,106	$	15,653		$	143,759
Total Realignment Charges
COS	$	63,280	$	66,759	$	34,956	$	164,995	$	8	$	165,003	$	92,977	$	73,342	$	40,845	$	207,164	$	8		$	207,172
SG&A	35,758		33,988		18,058		87,804		8,290		96,094		38,438		36,561		18,553		93,552		15,961			109,513
Income tax expense(2)	10,400		9,300		1,800		21,500		—		21,500
Income tax expense(1)													10,400		9,300		1,800		21,500		—			21,500
Total	$	109,438	$	110,047	$	54,814	$	274,299	$	8,298	$	282,597	$	141,815	$	119,203	$	61,198	$	322,216	$	15,969	��	$	338,185

____________________________

(1) ~~Includes $48.2 million of restructuring charges, primarily COS, related to the R1 Realignment Program.~~

~~(2)~~ Income tax expense includes exit taxes as well as non-deductible costs.

Restructuring charges represent costs associated with the relocation or reorganization of certain business activities and facility closures and include costs related to employee severance at closed facilities, contract termination costs, asset write-downs and other costs. Severance costs primarily include costs associated with involuntary termination benefits. Contract termination costs include costs related to termination of operating leases or other contract termination costs. Asset write-downs include accelerated depreciation of fixed assets, accelerated amortization of intangible assets, divestiture of certain non-strategic assets and inventory write-downs. Other costs generally include costs related to employee relocation, asset relocation, vacant facility costs (i.e., taxes and insurance) and other charges.

2229

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of restructuring charges, net of adjustments, for the Realignment Programs:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	Severance			Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other			Total
COS	$	(590	)	$	3	$	449	$	4,543		$	4,405
SG&A	(46		)	—		10		(159		)	(195		)
Total	$	(636	)	$	3	$	459	$	4,384		$	4,210



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Severance		Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total
COS	$	9,197	$	—	$	59	$	1,411	$	10,667
SG&A	440		—		52		723		1,215
Income tax expense	—		—		—		1,000		1,000
Total	$	9,637	$	—	$	111	$	3,134	$	12,882


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016										Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	Severance		Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total		Severance		Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total
COS	$	19,674	$	—	$	1,309	$	1,123	$	22,106	$	2,764	$	3	$	3,898	$	7,237	$	13,902
SG&A	2,948		—		66		1,295		4,309		1,246		—		10		43		1,299
Income tax expense	—		—		—		5,400		5,400
Total	$	22,622	$	—	$	1,375	$	7,818	$	31,815	$	4,010	$	3	$	3,908	$	7,280	$	15,201



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Severance			Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total
COS	$	4,978		$	226	$	5,210	$	7,716	$	18,130
SG&A	(1,377		)	—		242		1,763		628
Income tax expense	—			—		—		1,000		1,000
Total	$	3,601		$	226	$	5,452	$	10,479	$	19,758

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands) Severance Contract Termination Asset Write-Downs Other Total
     COS $ 22,975
$ —
$ 3,853
$ 4,530
$ 31,358
     SG&A 5,036
—
103
10,145
15,284
     Income tax expense —
—
—
5,400
5,400
Total $ 28,011
$ —
$ 3,956
$ 20,075
$ 52,042

The following is a summary of total inception to date restructuring charges, net of adjustments, related to the Realignment Programs:


	Inception to Date										Inception to Date
(Amounts in thousands)	Severance		Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total (1)		Severance		Contract Termination		Asset Write-Downs		Other		Total
COS~~(1)~~	$	76,922	$	834	$	14,127	$	15,595	$	107,478	$	84,949	$	905	$	19,215	$	22,125	$	127,194
SG&A	29,390		43		1,671		12,508		43,612		31,116		43		1,687		12,886		45,732
Income tax expense~~(2)~~(1)	—		—		—		21,500		21,500		—		—		—		21,500		21,500
Total	$	106,312	$	877	$	15,798	$	49,603	$	172,590	$	116,065	$	948	$	20,902	$	56,511	$	194,426

(1) ~~Includes $48.2 million of restructuring charges, primarily COS, related to the R1 Realignment Program.~~

~~(2)~~ Income tax expense includes exit taxes as well as non-deductible costs.

2330

Table of Contents

The following represents the activity, primarily severance, related to the restructuring reserve for the Realignment Programs for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


	2017									2016
(Amounts in thousands)	R1 Realignment Program			R2 Realignment Program			Total			R1 Realignment Program			R2 Realignment Program			Total			2018			2017
Balance at December 31	$	12,594		$	47,733		$	60,327		$	25,156		$	33,147		$	58,303		$	39,230		$	60,327		(2)
Charges, net of adjustments	(3,425		)	16,501			13,076			7,919			28,316			36,235			11,314			13,076
Cash expenditures	(10,542		)	(15,946		)	(26,488		)	(5,131		)	(22,886		)	(28,017		)	(15,935		)	(26,488		)
Other non-cash adjustments, including currency	3,378			(7,940		)	(4,562		)	(7,695		)	(864		)	(8,559		)
Other non-cash adjustments, including currency(1)																			(15,196		)	(4,562		)
Balance at September 30	$	2,005		$	40,348		$	42,353		$	20,249		$	37,713		$	57,962		$	19,413		$	42,353

(1) Includes a reduction of severance accruals associated with the the divestiture of two IPD locations and associated product lines. Refer to Note 3 of this Quarterly Report for further discussion.

(2) The reserve for the R1 Realignment Program was $12.6 million, which was substantially paid during the period.


Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, and the other financial data included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, and "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" ("MD&A") included in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Our Company

We believe that we are a world-leading manufacturer and aftermarket service provider of comprehensive flow control systems. We develop and manufacture precision-engineered flow control equipment integral to the movement, control and protection of the flow of materials in our customers’ critical processes. Our product portfolio of pumps, valves, seals, automation and aftermarket services supports global infrastructure industries, including oil and gas, chemical, power generation and water management, as well as general industrial markets where our products and services add value. Through our manufacturing platform and global network of Quick Response Centers ("QRCs"), we offer a broad array of aftermarket equipment services, such as installation, advanced diagnostics, repair and retrofitting. We currently employ approximately 17,000 employees in more than 50 countries.

Our business model is significantly influenced by the capital spending of global infrastructure industries for the placement of new products into service and aftermarket services for existing operations. The worldwide installed base of our products is an important source of aftermarket revenue, where products are expected to ensure the maximum operating time of many key industrial processes. Over the past several years, we have significantly invested in our aftermarket strategy to provide local support to drive customer investments in our offerings and use of our services to replace or repair installed products. The aftermarket portion of our business also helps provide business stability during various economic periods. The aftermarket business, which is primarily served by our network of ~~177~~174 QRCs located around the globe, provides a variety of service offerings for our customers including spare parts, service solutions, product life cycle solutions and other value-added services. It is generally a higher margin business compared to our original equipment business and a key component of our ~~profitable growth~~business strategy.

Our operations are conducted through three business segments that are referenced throughout this MD&A:

EPD for long ~~lead-time,~~lead time, custom and other highly-engineered pumps and pump systems, mechanical seals, auxiliary systems and replacement parts and related services;

IPD for engineered and pre-configured industrial pumps and pump systems and related products and services; and

FCD for engineered and industrial valves, control valves, actuators and controls and related services.

Our business segments share a focus on industrial flow control technology and have a high number of common customers. These segments also have complementary product offerings and technologies that are often combined in applications that provide us a net competitive advantage. Our segments also benefit from our global footprint and our economies of scale in reducing administrative and overhead costs to serve customers more cost effectively. For example, our segments share leadership for operational support functions, such as research and development, marketing and supply chain.

2431

Table of Contents

The reputation of our product portfolio is built on more than 50 well-respected brand names such as Worthington, IDP, Valtek, Limitorque, Durco, Edward, Anchor/Darling, SIHI, Halberg and Durametallic, which we believe to be one of the most comprehensive in the industry. Our products and services are sold either directly or through designated channels to more than 10,000 companies, including some of the world’s leading engineering, procurement and construction ("EPC") firms, original equipment manufacturers, distributors and end users.

We continue to leverage our QRC network to be positioned as near to customers as possible for service and support in order to capture valuable aftermarket business. Along with ensuring that we have the local capability to sell, install and service our equipment in remote regions, it is equally imperative to continuously improve our global operations. We continue to expand our global supply chain capability to meet global customer demands and ensure the quality and timely delivery of our products. Additionally, we continue to devote resources to improving the supply chain processes across our business segments to find areas of synergy and cost reduction and to improve our supply chain management capability to ensure it can meet global customer demands. We also remain focused on improving on-time delivery and quality, while managing warranty costs as a percentage of sales across our global operations, through the assistance of a focused Continuous Improvement Process ("CIP") initiative. The goal of the CIP initiative, which includes lean manufacturing, six sigma business management strategy and value engineering, is to maximize service fulfillment to customers through on-time delivery, reduced cycle time and quality at the highest internal productivity.

~~During~~Over the ~~first nine months~~past several quarters we have experienced a stabilization in business conditions and are beginning to gain traction and momentum in certain of ~~2017,~~ our ~~financial results~~key markets. With continued ~~to be challenged by capital spending declines, primarily in the oil and gas industry and pricing pressures. Although there has been~~ stability in oil prices, ~~over recent quarters,~~at improved levels beginning in the second half of 2017, our large-project business is showing initial signs of recovery and we anticipate that ~~the current environment~~customers will ~~persist throughout 2017.~~continue to increase maintenance and short cycle investment during 2018.

To better align costs and improve long-term efficiency, we initiated Realignment Programs to accelerate both short- and long-term strategic plans, including targeted manufacturing optimization through the consolidation of facilities, SG&A efficiency initiatives, transfer of activities from high-cost regions to lower-cost facilities and the divestiture of certain non-strategic assets. At the completion of the programs, we expect an approximately 20% reduction in our global workforce, relative to early 2015 workforce levels. With an expected near-term investment of approximately $360 million, including projects in process or under final evaluation, we expect the results of our Realignment Programs will deliver annualized run-rate savings of approximately $230 million. In addition, we are focusing on our ongoing low-cost sourcing, including greater use of third-party suppliers and increasing our lower-cost, emerging market capabilities.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" and ~~2016~~all related ASUs ("New Revenue Standard"), using the modified retrospective method for transition. For a discussion related to our adoption of the New Revenue Standard requirements refer to Notes 1 and 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Throughout this discussion of our results of operations, we discuss the impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have calculated currency effects on operations by translating current year results on a monthly basis at prior year exchange rates for the same periods.

~~As previously disclosed in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for~~In the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017, we identified accounting errors focused mainly at two of our non-U.S. sites in the inventory, accounts receivable, cost of sales and selling, general and administrative balances for prior periods through the firstsecond quarter of ~~2017. We assessed these errors, individually~~2018, we launched and ~~in the aggregate,~~committed resources to our Flowserve 2.0 Transformation ("Flowserve 2.0 Transformation"), a program designed to transform our business model to drive operational excellence, reduce complexity, accelerate growth, improve organizational health and ~~concluded that they were not material to any prior annual or interim period. However, to facilitate comparisons among periods we revised~~better leverage our ~~previously issued audited consolidated financial information~~existing global platform, which is ~~included~~further discussed in our 2016 Annual Report and unaudited condensed consolidated financial information for the interim periods included in our Form 10-Q/A and Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively. We also corrected the timing of immaterial previously recorded out-of-period adjustments and reflected them in the revised prior period financial statements, where applicable. Refer to Note 216 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly ~~Report for more information.~~

~~As discussed~~Report. We anticipate that the Flowserve 2.0 Transformation will result in ~~Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report, effective July 6, 2017, we sold our Flow Control Division's ("FCD") Vogt product line~~restructuring charges, non-restructuring charges and other related transformation expenses (e.g., professional services, project management and related ~~assets~~travel and ~~liabilities to a privately held company. In 2016, net sales~~expense). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, we incurred Flowserve 2.0 Transformation related toexpenses of $24.0 million and $27.4 million, respectively, primarily consisting of professional services and project management costs recorded in SG&A. We are currently evaluating the ~~Vogt business totaled approximately $17 million,~~total investment in and financial benefits of the various initiatives associated with ~~earnings before interest and taxes of approximately $4 million.~~

~~As discussed in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in~~ this Quarterly Report, effective May 2, 2017 we sold our FCD Gestra AG business to a leading provider of steam system solutions. In 2016, Gestra recorded revenues of approximately $101 million (€92 million) with earnings before interest and taxes of approximately $17 million (€15 million).program.

In 2015, we initiated Realignment Programs that consist of both restructuring and non-restructuring charges that are further discussed in Note 16 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. The Realignment Programs will continue throughout ~~2017~~2018 and the total charges for Realignment Programs by segment are detailed below for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD			IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments			Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
COS	$	7,170		$	750		$	288	$	8,208		$	—	$	8,208
SG&A	(658		)	(365		)	226		(797		)	3,716		2,919
Total	$	6,512		$	385		$	514	$	7,411		$	3,716	$	11,127

2532

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands) Engineered Product Division Industrial Product Division Flow Control Division Subtotal–Reportable Segments Eliminations and All Other Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
     COS $ 7,045
$ 2,021
$ 5,154
$ 14,220
$ —
$ 14,220
     SG&A 718
(379 ) 1,022
1,361
1,210
2,571
     Income tax expense 1,000
—
—
1,000
—
1,000
Total $ 8,763
$ 1,642
$ 6,176
$ 16,581
$ 1,210
$ 17,791


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016													Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division		Industrial Product Division		Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other			Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD			FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
COS	$	8,418	$	16,044	$	47	$	24,509	$	(6	)	$	24,503	$	7,045	$	2,021		$	5,154	$	14,220	$	—	$	14,220
SG&A	1,403		3,584		643		5,630		1,353			6,983		718		(379		)	1,022		1,361		1,210		2,571
Income tax expense	2,000		2,800		600		5,400		—			5,400		1,000		—			—		1,000		—		1,000
Total	$	11,821	$	22,428	$	1,290	$	35,539	$	1,347		$	36,886	$	8,763	$	1,642		$	6,176	$	16,581	$	1,210	$	17,791

The total charges for Realignment Programs by segment are detailed below for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(Amounts in thousands)	EPD		IPD		FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
COS	$	23,742	$	4,528	$	3,323	$	31,593	$	—	$	31,593
SG&A	3,252		1,443		1,292		5,987		5,760		11,747
Total	$	26,994	$	5,971	$	4,615	$	37,580	$	5,760	$	43,340


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017												Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
(Amounts in thousands)	Engineered Product Division		Industrial Product Division		Flow Control Division		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total		EPD		IPD		FCD		Subtotal–Reportable Segments		Eliminations and All Other		Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
COS	$	12,409	$	11,929	$	9,034	$	33,372	$	—	$	33,372	$	12,409	$	11,929	$	9,034	$	33,372	$	—	$	33,372
SG&A	7,948		10,181		3,668		21,797		3,839		25,636		7,948		10,181		3,668		21,797		3,839		25,636
Income tax expense	1,000		—		—		1,000		—		1,000		1,000		—		—		1,000		—		1,000
Total	$	21,357	$	22,110	$	12,702	$	56,169	$	3,839	$	60,008	$	21,357	$	22,110	$	12,702	$	56,169	$	3,839	$	60,008

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(Amounts in thousands) Engineered Product Division Industrial Product Division Flow Control Division Subtotal–Reportable Segments Eliminations and All Other Consolidated Total
Total Realignment Program Charges
     COS $ 14,410
$ 22,438
$ 6,053
$ 42,901
$ 8
$ 42,909
     SG&A 11,200
5,773
2,568
19,541
2,644
22,185
     Income tax expense 2,000
2,800
600
5,400
—
5,400
Total $ 27,610
$ 31,011
$ 9,221
$ 67,842
$ 2,652
$ 70,494

We anticipate a total investment in these Realignment Programs of approximately $360 ~~million, including projects in process or under final evaluation.~~million. Since inception of the Realignment Programs in 2015, we have incurred charges of ~~$282.6~~$338.2 million and we expect to incur ~~the~~most remaining charges ~~throughout~~by the ~~remainder~~end of ~~2017 and into~~ 2018.

~~Table of Contents~~

Based on actions under our Realignment Programs, we estimate that we have achieved cost savings of approximately ~~$150~~$192 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared with ~~$80~~$150 million in the same period of ~~2016.~~2017. Approximately ~~$95~~$124 million of those savings in 2018 are in COS with the remainder in SG&A. Upon completion of the Realignment Programs, we expect run-rate cost savings of approximately $230 million, of which ~~approximately $214 million would~~the vast majority is anticipated to be achieved in ~~2017.~~2018. Actual savings could vary from expected savings, which represent management’s ~~best~~ estimate to date.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Results

Bookings, Sales and Backlog


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Bookings	$	892.9	$	959.5	$	1,010.4	$	892.9
Sales	883.4		945.9		952.7		883.4


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Bookings	$	2,820.1	$	2,855.0	$	2,974.5	$	2,820.1
Sales	2,626.8		2,919.6		2,845.8		2,626.8

We define a booking as the receipt of a customer order that contractually engages us to perform activities on behalf of our customer with regard to manufacturing, service or support. Bookings recorded and subsequently canceled within the year-to-date period are excluded from year-to-date bookings. Bookings for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$66.6~~$117.5 million, or ~~6.9%~~13.2%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately ~~$16~~$9 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was driven by ~~decreases~~increases in the oil and gas, chemical ~~general~~ and water management industries, partially offset by decreased bookings in the power generation ~~industries.~~industry. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~due to~~more heavily-weighted towards customer original equipment bookings. The three months ended September 30, 2017 included bookings of approximately $2 million related to the FCD business that was divested in the third quarter of 2017.

Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$34.9~~$154.4 million, or ~~1.2%~~5.5%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016 and~~2017, which included 2017 bookings for an order ~~for~~of approximately $80 million to provide pumps and related equipment for the Hengli Integrated Refining Complex Project in ~~China.~~China which did not recur. The ~~decrease~~increase included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $7$57 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by the general, ~~power generation~~oil and gas and chemical industries, partially offset by ~~an increase~~decreased bookings in the ~~oil and gas~~power generation industry. The ~~decrease~~increase was more ~~heavily weighted~~heavily-weighted towards customer ~~original equipment~~aftermarket bookings. The nine months ended September 30, 2017 included bookings of approximately $41 million related to FCD's businesses that were divested in the second and third quarter of 2017.

Sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$62.5~~$69.3 million, or ~~6.6%~~7.8%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately ~~$15~~$8 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~due~~more heavily-weighted to ~~decreased~~ original equipment sales, with increased sales into North America, Latin America and Africa, partially offset by decreased sales ~~into every region except for~~in the Middle East. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales by approximately $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The three months ended September 30, 2017 included sales of approximately $5 million related to the FCD's business that was divested in the third quarter of 2017. Net sales to international customers, including export sales from the U.S., were approximately ~~66%~~63% and ~~62%~~66% of total sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$292.8~~$219.0 million, or ~~10.0%~~8.3%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $5$58 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily due~~more heavily-weighted to ~~decreased original equipment~~aftermarket sales, with increased sales into North America, Asia Pacific and Africa, partially offset by decreased sales ~~into every region.~~in the Middle East and Europe. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales by approximately $105 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The nine months ended September 30, 2017 included sales of approximately $42 million related to FCD's businesses that were divested in the second and third quarter of 2017. Net sales to international customers, including export sales from the U.S., were approximately ~~64%~~63% and ~~63%~~64% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, ~~and 2016.~~respectively.

Backlog represents the aggregate value of booked but uncompleted customer orders and is influenced primarily by bookings, sales, cancellations, and currency effects. Backlog of ~~$2,135.2~~$1,854.5 million at September 30, ~~2017~~ ~~increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$237.5~~$178.9 million, or ~~12.5%~~8.8%, as compared with December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Currency effects provided ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$106~~$44 million. The impact of the initial adoption of the New Revenue Standard reduced backlog by approximately $237 million at January 1, 2018. Approximately ~~31%~~35% of the backlog at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was related to aftermarket orders. Backlog includes our unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) performance obligations of approximately $1,354 million and approximately $501 million of customer orders that are generally subject to the possibility of customer cancellation for convenience without penalty (“Cancellable Backlog”). We have historically experienced very low cancellation rates such that any potential subsequent reversals of Cancellable Backlog are not expected to be material. The remaining portion of our total backlog is not cancellable without a substantive penalty and therefore represents remaining performance obligations as discussed in Note 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Table of Contents

Gross Profit and Gross Profit Margin

Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) 2017 2016
Gross profit $ 267.5
$ 278.0
Gross profit margin 30.3 % 29.4 %

~~Table of Contents~~



	Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2018			2017
Gross profit	$	308.5		$	268.0
Gross profit margin	32.4		%	30.3		%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Gross profit	$	781.0		$	903.8		$	866.0		$	782.5
Gross profit margin	29.7		%	31.0		%	30.4		%	29.8		%

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$10.5~~$40.5 million, or ~~3.8%~~15.1%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~30.3%~~32.4% increased from ~~29.4%~~30.3% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had a favorable impact on gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2018 of approximately 80 basis points. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributed to the favorable impact of increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, revenue recognized on higher margin projects and lower charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs. Aftermarket sales represented approximately 48% of total sales, as compared with approximately 50% of total sales for the same period in 2017.

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $83.5 million, or 10.7%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 of 30.4% increased from 29.8% for the same period in 2017. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had an unfavorable impact on gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 of approximately 10 basis points. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributed to a $6.3 million charge to write down inventory in Brazil in the third quarter of 2016 that did not recur, lower charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs and a mix shift to higher margin aftermarket sales, partially offset by the negative impact of decreased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, increased accrued broad-based annual incentive compensation and lower margin projects that shipped from backlog. Aftermarket sales increased to approximately 50% of total sales, as compared with approximately 44% of total sales for the same period in 2016.

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased by $122.8 million, or 13.6%, as compared with the same period in 2016. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of 29.7% decreased from 31.0% for the same period in 2016. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily attributed to the negative impact of decreased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, lower margin projects that shipped from backlog and a $16.9 million charge for costs ~~incurred~~ related to a contract to supply oil and gas platform equipment to an end user in Latin America ~~partially offset by $10.9 million~~in the second quarter of ~~charges to write down inventory in Brazil in 2016~~2017 that did not recur, ~~a mix shift to~~revenue recognized on higher margin ~~aftermarket~~projects, favorable impact of increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and ~~lower~~decreased charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs, ~~compared~~partially offset by a $7.7 million charge for cost incurred related to the ~~same period~~write-down of inventory associated with the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines in ~~2016.~~the second quarter of 2018. Aftermarket sales ~~increased to~~represented approximately 49% of total sales ~~as compared with approximately 44% of total sales for the same period~~ in ~~2016.~~

both 2018 and 2017.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
SG&A	$	206.3		$	281.3		$	241.9		$	206.0
SG&A as a percentage of sales	23.4		%	29.7		%	25.4		%	23.3		%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
SG&A	$	681.2		$	747.5		$	711.8		$	680.3
SG&A as a percentage of sales	25.9		%	25.6		%	25.0		%	25.9		%

SG&A for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$75.0~~$35.9 million, or ~~26.7%~~17.4%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Currency effects yielded ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately $3$2 million. SG&A as a percentage of sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased 630~~2018 increased 210 basis points as compared with the same period in ~~2016~~2017 primarily due to ~~the $73.5 million reserve established for our primary Venezuelan customer in the third quarter of 2016 that did not recur and increased savings~~charges related to our ~~Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2016, partially offset by~~Flowserve 2.0 Transformation program and increased ~~accrued~~ broad-based annual incentive compensation ~~and lower sales leverage.~~expense.

Table of Contents

SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$66.3~~$31.5 million, or ~~8.9%~~4.6%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Currency effects yielded ~~a decrease~~an increase of approximately $1$11 million. SG&A as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased 30~~2018 decreased 90 basis points as compared with the same period in ~~2016~~2017 primarily due to a $26.0 million impairment charge related to our manufacturing facility in Brazil ~~and lower sales leverage, substantially offset by the $73.5 million reserve established for our primary Venezuelan customer~~ in the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2016~~2017 that did not recur, lower stock-based compensation expense and lower charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs, ~~compared~~partially offset by charges related to the ~~same period~~Flowserve 2.0 Transformation program, implementation costs associated with our adoption of the New Revenue Standard, increased broad-based annual incentive compensation expense and an impairment charge of $9.7 million related to the long-lived assets associated with the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines in ~~2016.~~the second quarter of 2018.

(Loss) Gain on Sale of Businesses



	Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
(Loss) gain on sale of businesses	$	(7.7	)	$	9.9



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
(Loss) gain on sale of businesses	$	(7.7	)	$	141.2

The loss on sale of businesses for the three months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $17.6 million from a gain of $9.9 million in 2017 due to the loss of $7.7 million from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines in the third quarter of 2018 and the $9.9 million gain on the sale of FCD's Vogt business in the third quarter of 2017 that did not recur. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for additional information on these transactions.

~~Table~~The loss on sale of ~~Contents~~

businesses for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $148.9 million from a gain of $141.2 million in 2017 due to the loss of $7.7 million from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines in the third quarter of 2018 and the $141.2 million gain on the sale of FCD's Vogt and Gestra businesses in 2017 and that did not recur. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for additional information on these transactions.

Net Earnings from Affiliates


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Net earnings from affiliates	$	2.9	$	3.4	$	3.3	$	2.9


	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017		2016		2018		2017
Net earnings from affiliates	$	9.0	$	8.5	$	7.9	$	9.0

Net earnings from affiliates for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $0.5~~2018 increased $0.4 million, or ~~14.7%~~13.8%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase was primarily a result of increased earnings of our EPD joint venture in India.

Net earnings from affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased $0.5~~2018 decreased $1.1 million, or ~~5.9%~~12.2%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The decrease was primarily a result of decreased earnings of our EPD joint venture in South Korea.

Table of Contents

Operating Income and Operating Margin


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Operating income	$	74.0		$	0.1		$	62.2		$	74.8
Operating income as a percentage of sales	8.4		%	—		%	6.5		%	8.5		%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Operating income	$	250.0		$	164.8		$	154.3		$	252.3
Operating income as a percentage of sales	9.5		%	5.6		%	5.4		%	9.6		%

Operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$73.9~~$12.6 million, or 16.8%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $1$4 million. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily a result of the ~~$75.0~~$35.9 million ~~decrease~~increase in SG&A, ~~and~~ the ~~$10.9~~$9.9 million ~~pre-tax~~ gain onfrom the sale of the Vogt business in the third quarter of 2017 that did not recur and the loss of $7.7 million from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines, partially offset by the ~~$10.5~~$40.5 million ~~decrease~~increase in gross profit.

Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$85.2~~$98.0 million, or ~~51.7%~~38.8%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $6$2 million. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily a result of athe $141.2 million ~~pre-tax~~ gain from the sale of the Gestra and Vogt businesses in 2017 that did not recur, the $31.5 million increase in SG&A and the ~~$66.3~~loss of $7.7 million ~~decrease in SG&A,~~from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines, partially offset by the ~~$122.8~~$83.5 million ~~decrease~~increase in gross profit.

Interest Expense and Interest Income


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Interest expense	$	(15.0	)	$	(15.1	)	$	(13.8	)	$	(15.0	)
Interest income	1.1			0.9			1.3			1.1


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Interest expense	$	(44.7	)	$	(45.0	)	$	(43.6	)	$	(44.7	)
Interest income	2.4			2.2			4.2			2.4

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 decreased ~~$0.1~~$1.2 million and ~~$0.3~~$1.1 million, respectively, as compared with the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2016.~~2017. The decreases for the three and nine month periods were primarily attributable to decreased commitments and borrowings under Revolving Credit Facility in ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to the same periods in ~~2016.~~2017.

Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased $0.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, as compared with the same period in 2017. The increase in interest income for the three and nine month periods was primarily attributable to higher average cash balances compared with the same period in 2017.

Other (Expense) Income, Net



	Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
Other (expense) income, net	$	(5.3	)	$	7.5



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
Other expense, net	$	(17.2	)	$	(14.0	)

2937

Table of Contents

~~Other Income (Expense), Net~~

Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions) 2017 2016
Other income, net $ 8.3
$ 1.9

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions) 2017 2016
Other (expense) income, net $ (11.6 ) $ 1.1

Other ~~income,~~expense, net for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased ~~$6.4~~$12.8 million from income of $7.5 million in 2017, due primarily to a $1.3 million increase in gains arising from transactions on foreign exchange contracts and a $5.8 million increase in gains from transactions in currencies other than our sites' functional currencies. The net change was primarily due to the foreign currency exchange rate movements in the Euro, Mexican peso, British pound and Brazilian real in relation to the U.S. dollar during the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared with the same period in 2016.

~~Other expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $12.7 million from an income of $1.1 million in 2016, due primarily to a $6.8~~$11.1 million increase in losses from transactions in currencies other than our sites' functional currencies and a ~~$5.4~~$1.7 million increase in losses arising from transactions on foreign exchange contracts. The net change was primarily due to the foreign currency exchange rate movements in the Euro, Argentinian peso, Mexican peso ~~Brazilian real,~~and Indian rupee in relation to the U.S. dollar during the three months ended September 30, 2018, as compared with the same period in 2017.

Other expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased $3.2 million, as compared with the same period in 2017, due primarily to a $4.1 million increase in losses from transactions in currencies other than our sites' functional currencies and a $2.6 million increase in losses arising from transactions on foreign exchange contracts. The net change was primarily due to the foreign currency exchange rate movements in the Argentinian peso, Euro, Indian rupee and ~~British pound~~Mexican peso in relation to the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For a discussion related to hyperinflation in Argentina, refer to Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Tax Expense and Tax Rate


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Provision for income taxes	$	19.6		$	2.8		$	14.9		$	19.6
Effective tax rate	28.7		%	(23.2		)%	33.6		%	28.7		%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Provision for income taxes	$	85.8		$	49.5		$	37.0		$	85.8
Effective tax rate	43.8		%	40.2		%	37.9		%	43.8		%

The effective tax rate of ~~28.7%~~33.6% for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased from ~~(23.2)%~~28.7% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, including losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was ~~provided and~~provided. For further information concerning our taxes, ~~related to the sale~~including our evaluation of the ~~Vogt business.~~impact of the Act, please see Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

The effective tax rate of ~~43.8%~~37.9% for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased from ~~40.2%~~43.8% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory rate for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to the net impact of foreign operations, including losses in certain foreign jurisdictions for which no tax benefit was ~~provided and~~provided. For further information concerning our taxes, ~~related to~~including our evaluation on the ~~sale~~impact of the ~~Gestra and Vogt businesses.~~

~~Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~

Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions) 2017 2016
Other comprehensive income (loss) $ 17.2
$ (11.3 )

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions) 2017 2016
Other comprehensive income (loss) $ 84.8
$ (1.2 )
Act, please see Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

3038

Table of Contents

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income



	Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
Other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(17.0	)	$	17.2



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2018			2017
Other comprehensive (loss) income	$	(52.9	)	$	84.8

Other comprehensive ~~income~~loss for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased ~~$28.6~~$34.2 million ~~from a loss~~compared to income of ~~$11.3~~$17.2 million in ~~2016.~~2017. The increased loss was primarily due to foreign currency translation adjustments resulting primarily from exchange rate movements of the Indian rupee, Euro, Chinese yuan and Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar during the three months ended September 30, 2018, as compared with the same period in 2017.

Other comprehensive loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased $137.7 million compared to income of $84.8 million in 2017. The increased loss was primarily due to foreign currency translation adjustments resulting primarily from exchange rate movements of the Euro, Argentinian peso, Indian rupee and British pound ~~and Argentine peso versus the U.S. dollar during the three months ended September 30, 2017, as compared with the same period in 2016.~~

Other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $85.9 million from a loss of $1.2 million in 2016. The increased income was primarily due to foreign currency translation adjustments resulting primarily from exchange rate movements of the Euro, British pound and Mexican peso versus the U.S. dollar during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. For a discussion related to hyperinflation in Argentina, refer to Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Business Segments

We conduct our operations through three business segments based on the type of product and how we manage the business. We evaluate segment performance and allocate resources based on each segment’s operating income. The key operating results for our three business segments, EPD, IPD and FCD, are discussed below.

Engineered Product Division Segment Results

Our largest business segment is EPD, through which we design, manufacture, distribute and service custom and other highly-engineered pumps and pump systems, mechanical seals, auxiliary systems and spare parts (collectively referred to as "original equipment"). EPD includes longer lead-time, highly-engineered pump products and shorter cycle engineered pumps and mechanical seals that are generally manufactured more quickly. EPD also manufactures replacement parts and related equipment and provides a full array of replacement parts, repair and support services (collectively referred to as "aftermarket"). EPD primarily operates in the oil and gas, power generation, chemical and general industries. EPD operates in 47 countries with 3028 manufacturing facilities worldwide, ~~nine~~eight of which are located in Europe, nine in North America, ~~seven~~six in Asia and five in Latin America, and it operates ~~123~~120 QRCs, including those co-located in manufacturing facilities and/or shared with FCD.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Bookings	$	432.5		$	497.5		$	519.8		$	432.5
Sales	424.2			458.5			466.2			424.2
Gross profit	136.5			140.2			151.3			136.7
Gross profit margin	32.2		%	30.6		%	32.5		%	32.2		%
Segment operating income (loss)	51.8			(22.0		)
Segment operating income (loss) as a percentage of sales	12.2		%	(4.8		)%
SG&A							97.0			87.3
Segment operating income							57.4			52.1
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales							12.3		%	12.3		%

Table of Contents


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Bookings	$	1,357.2		$	1,387.5		$	1,450.3		$	1,357.2
Sales	1,276.6			1,444.2			1,414.6			1,276.6
Gross profit	403.8			459.5			439.4			404.4
Gross profit margin	31.6		%	31.8		%	31.1		%	31.7		%
SG&A							299.9			305.3
Segment operating income	106.9			97.4			147.8			107.8
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales	8.4		%	6.7		%	10.4		%	8.4		%

Bookings for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$65.0~~$87.3 million, or ~~13.1%~~20.2%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $7$3 million. The ~~decrease~~increase in customer bookings was ~~primarily~~ driven by the oil and gas and water management industries, partially offset by decreased bookings in the power generation and general ~~and chemical~~ industries. ~~Decreased~~Increased customer bookings of ~~$31.2~~$37.7 million into Europe, ~~$24.8~~$34.3 million into the Middle East, ~~$23.1~~$29.7 million into ~~Latin America~~Asia Pacific and ~~$16.6~~$15.4 million into North America were partially offset by ~~increased~~decreased customer bookings of ~~$29.9~~$30.4 million into Africa. The ~~decrease~~increase was more ~~heavily weighted~~heavily-weighted towards ~~customer original equipment bookings. Interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above) were flat when compared to the same period in 2016.~~

Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased by $30.3 million or 2.2%, as compared with the same period in 2016 and included an order for approximately $80 million to provide pumps and related equipment for the Hengli Integrated Refining Complex Project in China. The decrease included negative currency effects of approximately $4 million. The decrease in customer bookings was primarily driven by the power generation and general industries, partially offset by an increase

~~Table of Contents~~

in the oil and gas and chemical industries. Decreased customer bookings of $62.0 million into Europe, $61.0 million into the Middle East, $32.5 million into North America and $26.0 million into Latin America, were partially offset by increased customer bookings of $89.3 million into Asia Pacific and $43.7 million into Africa. The decrease was driven by customer aftermarket bookings. Interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above) remained relatively flat compared to the same period in 2017.

Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased ~~$5.0~~by $93.1 million, or 6.9%, as compared with the same period in 2017, which included 2017 bookings for an order of approximately $80 million to provide pumps and related equipment for the Hengli Integrated Refining Complex Project in China which did not recur. The increase included currency benefits of approximately $21 million. The increase in customer bookings was primarily driven by the water management, general, oil and gas and chemical industries. Increased customer bookings of $94.6 million into Europe, $41.1 million into the Middle East and $24.4 million into North America were partially offset by decreased customer bookings of $37.9 million into Asia Pacific and $33.0 million into Africa. The increase was driven by increased customer aftermarket bookings. Interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above) decreased by $1.1 million compared to the same period in 2017.

Sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $34.3~~2018 increased $42.0 million, or ~~7.5%~~9.9%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $5$2 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was driven by ~~customer~~aftermarket and original equipment ~~sales, resulting~~sales. The increase resulted from ~~decreased~~increased sales of ~~$32.5~~$32.4 million into Latin America, $17.3 million into Africa, $8.4 million into North America and ~~$4.4~~$5.3 million into ~~Latin America,~~Asia Pacific, partially offset by ~~increased~~decreased sales of ~~$5.2~~$22.5 million into the Middle East. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales by approximately $18 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above) increased ~~$1.1 million.~~by $1.2 million when compared to the same period in 2017.

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $167.6~~2018 increased $138.0 million, or ~~11.6%~~10.8%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $5$27 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was more ~~heavily weighted~~heavily-weighted towards ~~customer original equipment sales, resulting~~aftermarket sales. The increase resulted from ~~decreased~~increased sales of ~~$108.3~~$52.8 million into North America, ~~$37.5~~$46.8 million into Asia Pacific and $40.6 million into Latin America, ~~$14.8 million into Europe, $14.1 million into the Middle East and $11.5 million into Africa,~~ partially offset by decreased sales of $4.3 million into Europe. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales ~~of $20.1~~by approximately $60 million ~~into Asia Pacific.~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above) ~~decreased $1.7 million.~~increased by $5.8 million when compared to the same period in 2017.

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$3.7~~$14.6 million, or ~~2.6%~~10.7%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~32.2%~~32.5% increased from ~~30.6%~~32.2% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to ~~increased savings related to our Realignment Programs, a mix shift to higher margin aftermarket sales and a $6.3 million charge to write down inventory in Brazil in~~ the ~~third quarter of 2016 that did not recur, partially offset by the negative~~favorable impact of ~~decreased~~increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and ~~lower~~increased savings related to our Realignment Programs. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had a favorable impact on gross profit margin ~~projects that shipped from backlog.~~for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$55.7~~$35.0 million, or ~~12.1%~~8.7%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~31.6%~~31.1% decreased from ~~31.8%~~31.7% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to increased charges related to our Realignment Programs and revenue recognized on lower margin projects, partially offset by the ~~negative~~favorable impact of ~~decreased~~increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing ~~costs~~costs. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had a favorable impact on gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Table of Contents

SG&A for the three months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $9.7 million, or 11.1%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $1 million. The increase in SG&A is primarily attributable to higher selling and ~~lower margin projects~~administrative-related expenses as compared to the same period in 2017.

SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $5.4 million, or 1.8%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Currency effects provided an increase of approximately $4 million. The decrease in SG&A is primarily attributable to a $26.0 million impairment charge related to our manufacturing facility in Brazil in the second quarter of 2017 that ~~shipped from backlog, substantially offset by increased savings~~did not recur and decreased charges related to our Realignment Programs, ~~a mix shift~~partially offset by higher selling and administrative-related expenses as compared to ~~higher margin aftermarket sales and $10.9 million of charges to write down inventory~~the same period in ~~Brazil in 2016 that did not recur.~~2017.

Operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$73.8~~$5.3 million, or ~~335.5%~~10.2%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $1$3 million. The increase was primarily due to ~~a $77.9~~the $14.6 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~SG&A (including a increase due to currency effects of approximately $1 million),~~gross profit, partially offset by the ~~$3.7~~$9.7 million ~~decrease~~increase in ~~gross profit. The decrease in~~ SG~~&A is primarily due to EPD's $71.2 million portion of the $73.5 million reserve established for our primary Venezuelan customer in the third quarter of 2016 that did not recur.~~&A.

Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$9.5~~$40 million, or ~~9.8%~~37.1%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $2$4 million. The increase was primarily due to ~~a $64.5~~the $35.0 million increase in gross profit and the $5.4 million decrease in SG&A (including a decrease due to currency effects of approximately $1 million), partially offset by the $55.7 million decrease in gross profit. The decrease in SG&A is primarily due to EPD's $71.2 million portion of the $73.5 million reserve established for our primary Venezuelan customer in the third quarter of 2016 that did not recur and decreased charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs, partially offset by a $26.0 million impairment charge in the second quarter of 2017 related to our manufacturing facility in Brazil.&A.

Backlog of ~~$1,079.7~~$870.7 million at September 30, ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$112.9~~$157 million, or ~~11.7%~~15.3%, as compared with December 31, ~~2016~~.2017. The impact of the initial adoption of the New Revenue Standard reduced backlog by approximately $181 million at January 1, 2018. Currency effects provided ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$54~~$19 million. Backlog at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 included ~~$19.7~~$13.6 million and ~~$11.7~~$16.0 million, respectively, of interdivision backlog (which is eliminated and not included in consolidated backlog as disclosed above).

Industrial Product Division Segment Results

Through IPD, we design, manufacture, distribute and service engineered, pre-configured industrial pumps and pump systems, ~~including submersible motors~~and specialty products (collectively referred to as "original equipment"). Additionally, IPD manufactures replacement parts and related equipment, and provides a full array of support services (collectively referred to as "aftermarket"). IPD primarily operates in the oil and gas, chemical, power generation and general industries. IPD operates 1716 manufacturing facilities, five of which are located in the U.S, ~~eight~~six in Europe, ~~and~~ four in Asia and one in Latin America, and it operates 3028 QRCs worldwide, including 1917 sites in Europe, ~~six~~five in the U.S., three in Asia and two in Latin America, including those co-located in manufacturing facilities.



	Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2018			2017
Bookings	$	199.8		$	196.9
Sales	199.1			189.7
Gross profit	47.0			39.3
Gross profit margin	23.6		%	20.7		%
SG&A	42.1			43.2
Loss on sale of business	(7.7		)	—
Segment operating loss	(2.5		)	(3.5		)
Segment operating loss as a percentage of sales	(1.3		)%	(1.8		)%



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2018			2017
Bookings	$	633.2		$	616.6
Sales	603.0			559.9
Gross profit	130.1			98.3
Gross profit margin	21.6		%	17.6		%
SG&A	148.0			144.5
Loss on sale of business	(7.7		)	—
Segment operating loss	(25.2		)	(45.7		)
Segment operating loss as a percentage of sales	(4.2		)%	(8.2		)%

3241

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) 2017 2016
Bookings $ 196.9
$ 189.6
Sales 189.7
203.3
Gross profit 39.3
30.5
Gross profit margin 20.7 % 15.0 %
Segment operating loss (3.6 ) (17.1 )
Segment operating loss as a percentage of sales (1.9 )% (8.4 )%

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages) 2017 2016
Bookings $ 616.6
$ 609.5
Sales 559.9
615.8
Gross profit 98.1
128.5
Gross profit margin 17.5 % 20.9 %
Segment operating loss (46.0 ) (10.4 )
Segment operating loss as a percentage of sales (8.2 )% (1.7 )%

Bookings for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$7.3~~$2.9 million, or ~~3.9%~~1.5%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $4$2 million. The increase in customer bookings was primarily driven by the ~~oil~~chemical and ~~gas and water~~general industries, partially offset by ~~a decrease~~decreases in the ~~general~~water management and power generation industries. Increased customer bookings of ~~$8.9~~$3.3 million into ~~Africa and $1.4~~Asia Pacific, $2.2 million into Latin America and $2.0 million into North America were partially offset by decreased customer bookings of ~~$3.3~~$5.4 million into ~~the Middle East and $1.1 million into Asia Pacific.~~Africa. The increase was ~~more heavily weighted towards~~driven by increased customer ~~original equipment~~aftermarket bookings. Interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above) increased ~~$1.5 million.~~by $2.5 million compared to the same period in 2017.

Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$7.1~~$16.6 million, or ~~1.2%~~2.7%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016 and~~2017. The increase included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $1$17 million. ~~Customer~~The increase in customer bookings ~~increases in~~was primarily driven by the ~~oil and gas~~power generation, chemical, and general industries, ~~were~~ partially offset by ~~decreases~~a decrease in the ~~chemical and~~ water ~~industries.~~management industry. Increased customer bookings of ~~$13.4 million into Europe, $7.6 million into Africa and $4.6~~$18.5 million into Latin America and $13.2 million into Europe were partially offset by decreased customer bookings of ~~$21.7~~$14.9 million into ~~the Middle East and $4.9 million into Asia Pacific.~~North America. The increase was ~~due to~~driven by increased customer ~~original equipment~~aftermarket bookings. Interdivision bookings (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated bookings as disclosed above) increased ~~$3.3 million.~~by $5 million compared to the same period in 2017.

Sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $13.6~~2018 increased $9.4 million, or ~~6.7%~~5.0%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency effects of approximately $2 million and was more heavily-weighted towards original equipment sales. The increase primarily resulted from increased sales of $8.8 million into North America. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales by approximately $18 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above) remained relatively flat when compared to the same period in 2017.

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased $43.1 million, or 7.7%, as compared with the same period in 2017. The increase included currency benefits of approximately $4$16 million and was ~~driven by decreased customer original equipment~~more heavily-weighted towards aftermarket sales. The ~~decrease~~increase primarily resulted from ~~decreased~~increased sales of ~~$13.0~~$19.0 million into ~~Asia Pacific, $8.7~~Europe, $18.7 million into North America and ~~$4.3~~$3.7 million into ~~Africa, partially offset by~~Africa. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales ~~of $5.9~~by approximately $32 million ~~into Europe.~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above) increased by $2.3 million when compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased $55.9 million, or 9.1%, as compared with the same period in 2016. The decrease included negative currency effects of approximately $1 million and was driven by decreased customer original equipment sales. The decrease resulted from decreased sales of $30.5 million into North America, $22.0 million into Asia Pacific and $7.3 million into Africa, partially offset by increased sales of $2.6 million into the Middle East. Interdivision sales (which are eliminated and are not included in consolidated sales as disclosed above) increased $1.9 million when compared to the same period in 2016.2017.

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$8.8~~$7.7 million, or ~~28.9%~~19.6%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~20.7%~~23.6% increased from ~~15.0%~~20.7% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to lower charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs, ~~partially offset by the negative~~revenue recognized on higher margin projects and favorable impact of ~~decreased~~increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had a favorable impact on gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$30.4~~$31.8 million, or ~~23.7%~~32.3%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~17.5% decreased~~21.6% increased from ~~20.9%~~17.6% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to a $16.9 million charge ~~in the second quarter of 2017~~ for costs ~~incurred~~ related to a contract to supply oil and gas platform equipment to an end user in Latin America ~~and~~in the

~~Table~~ second quarter of ~~Contents~~

~~negative impact of decreased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs, partially offset by~~2017 that did not recur, lower charges and increased savings related to our Realignment ~~Programs.~~Programs and revenue recognized on higher margin projects, partially offset by a $7.7 million charge for cost incurred related to the write-down of inventory associated with the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines.

SG&A for the three months ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $1.1 million, or 2.5%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Currency effects provided a decrease of less than $1 million. The decrease in SG&A is primarily due to increased savings associated with our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2017.

SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $3.5 million, or 2.4%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Currency effects provided an increase of approximately $4 million. The increase in SG&A is primarily due to an impairment charge on long-lived assets related to the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines of $9.7 million, partially offset by lower charges related our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2017.

Operating loss for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 decreased by ~~$13.5~~$1.0 million, or ~~78.9%~~28.6%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The decrease included currency benefits of less than $1 million. The decrease was primarily due to the $7.7 million increase in gross profit and a $1.1 million decrease in SG&A, partially offset by a $7.7 million loss from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines.

Operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $20.5 million, or 44.9%, as compared with the same period in 2017. The decrease included negative currency effects of approximately $1 million. The ~~decreased loss~~decrease was primarily due to the ~~$8.8~~$31.8 million increase in gross profit, partially offset by a $7.7 million loss from the divestiture of two IPD locations and related product lines and a $4.7 million decrease in SG&A (including a increase due to currency effects of approximately $1 million). The decrease in SG&A is primarily due to decreased charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs.

Operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $35.6 million, or 342.3%, as compared with the same period in 2016. The increase included negative currency effects of less than one million. The increased loss was primarily due to the $30.4 million decrease in gross profit and a $4.9$3.5 million increase in SG~~&A (including a decrease due to currency effects~~&A.

Table of ~~less than one million). The increase in SG&A is primarily due to increased charges related to our Realignment Programs which were partially offset by an increase in related savings.~~Contents

Backlog of ~~$437.0~~$390.2 million at September 30, ~~2017~~ ~~increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$63.5~~$34.1 million, or ~~17.0%~~8.0%, as compared with December 31, ~~2016~~.2017. The impact of the initial adoption of the New Revenue Standard reduced backlog by approximately $34 million at January 1, 2018. Currency effects provided ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$36~~$12 million. Backlog at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 included ~~$17.7~~$17.9 million and ~~$14.2~~$17.3 million, respectively, of interdivision backlog (which is eliminated and not included in consolidated backlog as disclosed above).

Flow Control Division Segment Results

Our second largest business segment is FCD, which designs, manufactures and distributes a broad portfolio of engineered-to-order and configured-to-order isolation valves, control valves, valve automation products, boiler controls and related services. FCD leverages its experience and application know-how by offering a complete menu of engineered services to complement its expansive product portfolio. FCD has a total of 5047 manufacturing facilities and QRCs in 2521 countries around the world, with five of its 2221 manufacturing operations located in the U.S., ~~nine~~ten located in Europe, ~~seven~~five located in Asia Pacific and one located in Latin America. Based on independent industry sources, we believe that FCD is the third largest industrial valve supplier on a global basis.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Bookings	$	285.9		$	291.9		$	314.2		$	285.9
Sales	287.7			299.3			306.2			287.7
Gross profit	91.7			108.0			109.4			91.9
Gross profit margin	31.9		%	36.1		%	35.7		%	31.9		%
SG&A							52.9			52.9
Gain on sale of business							—			9.9
Segment operating income	48.5			53.7			56.4			48.8
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales	16.9		%	17.9		%	18.4		%	17.0		%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions, except percentages)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Bookings	$	911.2		$	913.8		$	957.9		$	911.2
Sales	843.5			915.5			889.9			843.5
Gross profit	277.4			315.0			298.6			278.0
Gross profit margin	32.9		%	34.4		%	33.6		%	33.0		%
SG&A							161.1			163.8
Gain on sale of businesses							—			141.2
Segment operating income	254.1			140.5			136.7			255.1
Segment operating income as a percentage of sales	30.1		%	15.3		%	15.4		%	30.2		%

Bookings for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$6.0~~$28.3 million, or ~~2.1%~~9.9%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Bookings included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $5$4 million. ~~Decreased~~Increased customer bookings in the ~~chemical~~oil and ~~power generation~~gas and general industries were partially offset by ~~increases~~decreases in the ~~general and oil and gas industries. Decreased~~power generation industry. Increased customer bookings of ~~$19.6~~$11.9 million into Asia Pacific, $11.7 million into Europe and ~~$2.4~~$4.4 million into ~~Latin~~North America were partially offset by ~~increased customer~~decreased bookings of ~~$15.5~~$5.3 million into ~~North America.~~the Middle East. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by increased customer original equipment bookings. The three months ended September 30, 2017 included bookings of approximately $2 million related to the FCD business that was divested in the third quarter of 2017.

Bookings for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$2.6~~$46.7 million, or ~~0.3%~~5.1%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Bookings included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of approximately $2$18 million. ~~Decreased~~Increased customer bookings in the general and ~~chemical~~oil and gas industries were ~~substantially~~partially offset by ~~increases~~decreases in the power generation industry. Increased customer bookings of $68.8 million into North America were partially offset by decreased customer bookings of $18.9 million into the Middle East and ~~oil~~$9.1 million into Europe. The increase was more heavily-weighted towards customer original equipment bookings. The nine months ended September 30, 2017 included bookings of approximately $41 million related to FCD's businesses that were divested in the second and ~~gas industries. Decreased~~third quarter of 2017.

3443

Table of Contents

customer bookings of $58.2 million into Europe and $20.9 million into Latin America were substantially offset by increased customer bookings of $39.4 million into Asia Pacific, $13.3 million into the Middle East, $11.9 million into North America and $9.0 million into Africa. The decrease was driven by customer original equipment bookings.

Sales for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $11.6~~2018 increased $18.5 million, or ~~3.9%~~6.4%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $5$4 million and was driven by ~~decreased customer~~increased original equipment sales. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by ~~decreased~~increased customer sales of ~~$7.2 million into Europe, $6.8~~$26.2 million into North America and ~~$4.7 million into Latin America, partially offset by increased customer sales of $5.1~~$6.8 million into Asia Pacific, ~~and $4.1~~partially offset by decreased sales of $13.1 million into ~~Africa.~~the Middle East and $3.2 million into Europe. The adoption of the New Revenue Standard decreased sales by approximately $12 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The three months ended September 30, 2017 included sales of approximately $5 million related to the FCD business that was divested in the third quarter of 2017.

Sales for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased $72.0~~2018 increased $46.4 million, or ~~7.9%~~5.5%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included currency benefits of approximately $1$15 million and was ~~driven by decreased customer~~was more heavily-weighted towards original equipment sales. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by ~~decreased~~increased customer sales of ~~$26.8 million into the Middle East, $18.6 million into Europe, $11.2~~$53.5 million into North America and ~~$8.7~~$38.0 million into Asia Pacific, partially offset by ~~increased~~decreased customer sales of ~~$2.7~~$33.9 million into ~~Africa.~~Europe and $10.4 million into the Middle East. The adoption of the New Revenue Standard increased sales by approximately $13 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The nine months ended September 30, 2017 included sales of approximately $42 million related to FCD's businesses that were divested in the second and third quarter of 2017.

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$16.3~~$17.5 million, or ~~15.1%~~19.0%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 of ~~31.9% decreased~~35.7% increased from ~~36.1%~~31.9% for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to ~~increased charges related to our Realignment Programs and~~ the ~~negative~~favorable impact of ~~decreased~~increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs ~~partially offset~~and decreased charges and increased savings related to our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2017. The impact of the adoption of the New Revenue Standard had an favorable impact on gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 increased by $20.6 million, or 7.4%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 of 33.6% increased from 33.0% for the same period in 2017. The increase in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to the positive impact of increased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs and decreased charges and increased savings achieved related to our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~

~~Gross profit for~~2017. The impact of the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased by $37.6 million, or 11.9%, as compared with~~adoption of the ~~same period in 2016. Gross~~New Revenue Standard had an unfavorable impact on gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 of 32.9% decreased from 34.4%~~2018.

SG&A for the three months ended September 30, 2018 remained constant, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Currency effects provided a decrease of approximately $1 million.

SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 decreased by $2.7 million, or 1.6%, as compared with the same period in 2017. Currency effects provided an increase of approximately $3 million. The decrease in ~~gross profit margin was~~SG&A is primarily ~~attributable~~due to ~~the negative impact of decreased sales on our absorption of fixed manufacturing costs~~lower charges and ~~lower margin projects shipped from backlog, partially offset by~~ increased savings ~~achieved~~ related to our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017.

Operating income for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017 decreased~~2018 increased by ~~$5.2~~$7.6 million, or ~~9.7%~~15.6%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~decrease~~increase included negative currency ~~benefits~~effects of approximately $1 million. The ~~decrease~~increase was due to the ~~$16.3~~$17.5 million ~~decrease~~increase in gross profit, partially offset by the $9.9 million pre-tax gain from the sale of the Vogt business ~~and a decrease~~ in ~~SG&A~~the third quarter of $1.0 million (including a increase due to currency effects of approximately $1 million). The decrease in SG&A was primarily due to savings achieved related to our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2016.2017.

Operating income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased by ~~$113.6~~$118.4 million, or ~~80.9%~~46.3%, as compared with the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~increase~~decrease included ~~negative~~ currency ~~effects~~benefits of ~~approximately $3~~less than $1 million. The ~~increase~~decrease was ~~primarily attributable~~due to the $141.2 million of pre-tax gain from the sales of the Gestra and Vogt businesses in 2017, which was partially offset by the $20.6 million increase in gross profit and athe decrease in SG&A of $9.4 million (including a decrease due to currency effects of less than one million), partially offset by the $37.6 million decrease in gross profit. The decrease in SG&A was primarily due to savings achieved related to our Realignment Programs compared to the same period in 2016.$2.7 million.

Backlog of ~~$659.8~~$626.5 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 increased by ~~$75.3~~$9.1 million, or ~~12.9%~~1.5%, as compared with December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The impact of the initial adoption of the New Revenue Standard reduced backlog by approximately $35 million at January 1, 2018. Currency effects provided ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$16~~$13 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flow and Liquidity Analysis


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Amounts in millions)	2017			2016			2018			2017
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	72.4		$	70.9		$	26.3		$	72.4
Net cash flows provided (used) by investing activities	171.1			(68.9		)
Net cash flows (used) provided by investing activities							(49.6		)	171.1
Net cash flows used by financing activities	(136.2		)	(114.3		)	(133.2		)	(136.2		)

Table of Contents

Existing cash, cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our existing Revolving Credit Facility are our primary sources of short-term liquidity. We monitor the depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents on a regular basis, and we believe that we have placed our deposits with creditworthy financial institutions. Our sources of operating cash generally include the sale of our products and services and the conversion of our working capital, particularly accounts receivable and inventories. Our cash balance at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$502.1~~$529.9 million,, as compared with ~~$367.2~~$703.4 million at December 31, ~~2016~~.2017.

~~Table of Contents~~

Our cash balance ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$134.9~~$173.5 million to ~~$502.1~~$529.9 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2018, as compared with December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The cash ~~provided~~used during the first nine months of ~~2017~~2018 included ~~$208.8 million in net cash proceeds from the sale of our Gestra and Vogt businesses, partially offset by cash used of $74.4~~$74.5 million in dividend payments and $45.0 million of payments on long-term debt and $40.6 million in capital expenditures. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for more information on the sale of our Gestra and Vogt businesses.debt.

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~,2018, our cash provided by operating activities was ~~$72.4~~$26.3 million, as compared ~~with $70.9~~to $72.4 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. Cash flow used by working capital ~~decreased~~increased for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, due primarily to ~~decreased~~increased uses of cash related to ~~accrued liabilities and income taxes payable, inventory and~~contract assets, inventories, accounts payable ~~partially offset by a decreased source of cash related to accounts receivable as compared to the same period in 2016.~~and prepaid expenses and other assets, net.

~~Decreases~~Increases in accounts receivable ~~provided $63.8~~used $9.5 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared with ~~$69.8~~cash provided of $63.8 million for the same period in ~~2016.~~2017. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our days’ sales outstanding ("DSO") was 8774 days as compared with 8487 days as of September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The adoption of the New Revenue Standard as of January 1, 2018 had an estimated favorable impact of 7 days on DSO as of September 30, 2018.

~~Decreases~~Increases in ~~prepaid expenses and other provided $43.5~~contract assets used $54.8 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, as compared with a use of $58.7 million for the same period in 2016,~~2018, due primarily to ~~a decrease~~revenue recognized in ~~prepaid income taxes in 2017 compared to an increase in 2016.~~advance of customer invoices.

Increases in inventory used ~~$20.4~~$46.7 million and ~~$31.5 million of cash flow for the~~ ~~nine~~ ~~months ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016, respectively. Inventory turns were~~ ~~2.6~~ ~~times at both September 30, 2017 and 2016. Our calculation of inventory turns does not reflect the impact of advanced cash received from our customers. Decreases in accounts payable used $68.0~~$20.4 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, asrespectively. Inventory turns were 3.9 times at September 30, 2018, compared with ~~$98.8 million~~2.6 times for the same period in ~~2016~~. 2017. The adoption of the New Revenue Standard as of January 1, 2018 had an estimated favorable impact of approximately 1.3 times on our inventory turn calculation as of September 30, 2018.

Decreases in ~~accrued liabilities and income taxes~~accounts payable used ~~$6.7~~$30.0 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 as compared with ~~$82.3~~$68.0 million for the same period in ~~2016~~.

~~Cash flows provided by investing activities during~~2017. Decreases in accrued liabilities and income taxes payable used $13.7 million of cash flow for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017 were $171.1 million~~2018, as compared with ~~a use of $68.9~~$6.7 million for the same period in ~~2016~~,2017.

Cash flows used by investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were $49.6 million, as compared with cash provided of $171.1 million for the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily due to $208.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of our Gestra and Vogt ~~businesses.~~businesses in the second and third quarter of 2017 that did not recur. Capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$40.6~~$50.0 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$23.9~~$9.4 million as compared with the same period in ~~2016~~.2017. Our capital expenditures are generally focused on strategic initiatives to pursue new markets, geographic expansion, information technology infrastructure, ongoing scheduled replacements and upgrades, and cost reduction opportunities. In ~~2017,~~2018, total capital expenditures are expected to be between $70 million and $80 million.

Cash flows used by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 were ~~$136.2~~$133.2 million, as compared with ~~$114.3~~$136.2 million for the same period in ~~2016~~.2017. Cash outflows during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 resulted primarily from ~~$74.4~~$74.5 million of dividend payments and $45.0 million of payments on long-term debt.

Our Senior Credit Facility matures in October 2020. Approximately ~~8.3%~~13% of our outstanding Term Loan Facility is due to mature in the remainder of ~~2017~~2018 and approximately ~~33.3%~~50% in ~~2018.~~2019. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had an available capacity of ~~$708.2~~$416.5 million on our $800.0 million Revolving Credit Facility. Our borrowing capacity is subject to financial covenant limitations based on the terms of our Senior Credit Facility and is also reduced by outstanding letters of credit. Our Revolving Credit Facility is committed and held by a diversified group of financial institutions.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017, we contributed $20 million to our U.S. pension plan. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, our U.S. pension plan was fully funded as defined by applicable law. After consideration of our funded status, we do not anticipate making any additional contributions to our U.S. pension plan in ~~2017,~~2018, excluding direct benefits paid. We continue to maintain an asset allocation consistent with our strategy to maximize total return while reducing portfolio risks through asset class diversification.

At September 30, 2017, $489.4 million of our total cash balance of $502.1 million was held by foreign subsidiaries, $375.8 million of which we consider permanently reinvested outside the U.S. Based on the expected near-term liquidity needs of our various geographies and our currently available sources of domestic short-term liquidity, we currently do not anticipate the need to repatriate any permanently reinvested cash to fund domestic operations that would generate adverse tax results. However, in the event this cash is needed to fund domestic operations, we estimate the full $375.8 million could be repatriated resulting in a U.S. cash tax liability between $5.0 million and $15.0 million. Should we be required to repatriate this cash, it could limit our ability to assert permanent reinvestment of foreign earnings and invested capital in future periods.

Considering our current debt structure and cash needs, we currently believe cash flows generated from operating activities combined with availability under our Revolving Credit Facility and our existing cash balance will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for the next 12 months. Cash flows from operations could be adversely affected by economic, political and other risks associated with sales of our products, operational factors, competition, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and fluctuations in interest rates, among other factors. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" below.

3645

Table of Contents

On November 13, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a $500.0 million share repurchase authorization, of which as of September 30, ~~2017~~,2018, we have $160.7 million of remaining capacity. While we intend to continue to return cash through dividends and/or share repurchases for the foreseeable future, any future returns of cash through dividends and/or share repurchases will be reviewed individually, declared by our Board of Directors and implemented by management at its discretion, depending on our financial condition, business opportunities and market conditions at such time.

Financing

Credit Facilities

See Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report and Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for a discussion of our Senior Credit Facility and covenants related to our Senior Credit Facility. We complied with all covenants through September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

We had outstanding letters of credit of $74.8 million and $94.8 million at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, which together with financial covenant limitations based on the terms of our Senior Credit Facility, contributed to the reduction of our borrowing capacity to $416.5 million and $644.8 million, respectively. Our compliance with applicable financial covenants under the Senior Credit Facility is tested quarterly, and we complied with all applicable covenants as of September 30, 2018.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related footnotes contained within this Quarterly Report. ~~Our~~The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, our critical accounting policies and methodology used in determining estimates for revenue and related expenses changed. On January 1, 2018, we adopted the New Revenue Standard using the modified retrospective method for transition and modified our accounting policies and practices to support our accounting estimates of revenue and expenses in accordance with U.S. GAAP. For a discussion related to our adoption of the New Revenue Standard and the impacts on revenue and expenses, refer to Notes 1 and 2 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Critical policies for other significant estimates, for which no significant changes have occurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, include:

•Deferred Taxes, Tax Valuation Allowances and Tax Reserves;

•Reserves for Contingent Loss;

•Retirement and Postretirement Benefits; and

•Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.

For the other significant estimates referenced above, our critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements were discussed in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report. ~~These critical policies, for which no significant changes have occurred in the~~ ~~nine~~ ~~months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017, include:~~

~~Revenue Recognition;~~

~~Deferred Taxes, Tax Valuation Allowances and Tax Reserves;~~

~~Reserves for Contingent Loss;~~

~~Retirement and Postretirement Benefits; and~~

~~Valuation of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets.~~

The process of preparing condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The significant estimates are reviewed quarterly with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our condensed consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations. This is not to suggest that other general risk factors, such as changes in worldwide demand, changes in material costs, performance of acquired businesses and others, could not adversely impact our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future periods. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" below.

Table of Contents

ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

We have presented the information about pronouncements not yet implemented in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Words or phrases such as, "may," "should," "expects," "could," "intends," "plans," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes," "predicts" or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which include, without limitation, statements concerning our future financial performance, future debt and financing levels, investment objectives, implications of litigation and regulatory investigations and other management plans for future operations and performance.

The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report are based on our current expectations, projections, estimates and assumptions. These statements are only predictions, not guarantees. Such forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. These risks and uncertainties may cause actual results to differ materially from what is forecast in such forward-looking statements, and include, without limitation, the following:

a portion of our bookings may not lead to completed sales, and our ability to convert bookings into revenues at acceptable profit margins;

changes in the global financial markets and the availability of capital and the potential for unexpected cancellations or delays of customer orders in our reported backlog;

our dependence on our customers' ability to make required capital investment and maintenance expenditures;

risks associated with cost overruns on fixed fee projects and in accepting customer orders for large complex custom engineered products;

the substantial dependence of our sales on the success of the oil and gas, chemical, power generation and water management industries;

the adverse impact of volatile raw materials prices on our products and operating margins;

economic, political and other risks associated with our international operations, including military actions or trade embargoes that could affect customer markets, particularly North African, Russian and Middle Eastern markets and global oil and gas producers, and non-compliance with U.S. export/reexport control, foreign corrupt practice laws, economic sanctions and import laws and regulations;

increased aging and slower collection of receivables, particularly in Latin America and other emerging markets;

our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the Euro and British pound and in hyperinflationary countries such as ~~Venezuela;~~Venezuela and Argentina;

our furnishing of products and services to nuclear power plant facilities and other critical applications;

potential adverse consequences resulting from litigation to which we are a party, such as litigation involving asbestos-containing material claims;

a foreign government investigation regarding our participation in the United Nations Oil-For-Food Program;

expectations regarding acquisitions and the integration of acquired businesses;

our relative geographical profitability and its impact on our utilization of deferred tax assets, including foreign tax credits;

the potential adverse impact of an impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangible assets;

our dependence upon third-party suppliers whose failure to perform timely could adversely affect our business operations;

the highly competitive nature of the markets in which we operate;

environmental compliance costs and liabilities;

potential work stoppages and other labor matters;

access to public and private sources of debt financing;

our inability to protect our intellectual property in the U.S., as well as in foreign countries;

obligations under our defined benefit pension plans;

risks and potential liabilities associated with cyber security threats; ~~and~~

~~our inability to execute and realize the expected financial benefits of our strategic manufacturing optimization and other cost-saving initiatives.~~

our internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or ~~fraud.~~fraud;

the recording of increased deferred tax asset valuation allowances in the future or the impact of tax law changes on such deferred tax assets could affect our operating results;

if we are not able to successfully execute and realize the expected financial benefits from our strategic realignment and other cost-saving initiatives, our business could be adversely affected; and

ineffective internal controls could impact the accuracy and timely reporting of our business and financial results.

These and other risks and uncertainties are more fully discussed in the risk factors identified in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in Part I of our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report and Part II of this ~~10-Q,~~Quarterly Report, and may be identified in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and our other filings with the SEC and/or press releases from time to time. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.


Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

We have market risk exposure arising from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rate movements in foreign exchange contracts. We are exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to financial instruments, but we currently expect our counterparties will continue to meet their obligations given their current creditworthiness.

Interest Rate Risk

Our earnings are impacted by changes in short-term interest rates as a result of borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility, which bear interest based on floating rates. At September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had ~~$180.0~~$120.0 million of variable rate debt obligations outstanding under our Senior Credit Facility with a weighted average interest rate of ~~2.58%~~3.89%. A hypothetical change of 100 basis points in the interest rate for these borrowings, assuming constant variable rate debt levels, would have changed interest expense by ~~$1.4~~approximately $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

A substantial portion of our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries outside of the U.S. in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Almost all of our non-U.S. subsidiaries conduct their business primarily in their local currencies, which are also their functional currencies. Foreign currency exposures arise from translation of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars and from transactions, including firm commitments and anticipated transactions, denominated in a currency other than our or a non-U.S. subsidiary’s functional currency. In March 2015, we designated €255.7 million of our €500.0 million 2022 Euro Senior Notes as a net investment hedge of our investments in certain of our international subsidiaries that use the Euro as their functional currency. Generally, we view our investments in foreign subsidiaries from a long-term perspective and use capital structuring techniques to manage our investment in foreign subsidiaries as deemed necessary. We realized net (losses) gains ~~(losses)~~ associated with foreign currency translation of ~~$17.7~~$(19.7) million and ~~$(15.6)~~$17.7 million for the three months September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and ~~2016~~$(61.2) million and $85.8 ~~million and $(12.6)~~ million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~,2017, respectively, which are included in other comprehensive ~~income (loss).~~loss.

We employ a foreign currency risk management strategy to minimize potential changes in cash flows from unfavorable foreign currency exchange rate movements. Where available, the use of foreign exchange contracts allows us to mitigate transactional exposure to exchange rate fluctuations as the gains or losses incurred on the foreign exchange contracts will offset, in whole or in part, losses or gains on the underlying foreign currency exposure. Our policy allows foreign currency coverage only for identifiable foreign currency exposures and beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013 instruments that meet certain criteria are designated for hedge accounting. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we had a U.S. dollar equivalent of ~~$237.6~~$266.6 million in aggregate notional amount outstanding in foreign exchange contracts with third parties, as compared with ~~$393.8~~$235.6 million at December 31, ~~2016~~2017. Transactional currency gains and losses arising from transactions outside of our sites’ functional currencies and changes in fair value of non-designated foreign exchange contracts are included in our consolidated results of operations. We recognized foreign currency net (losses) gains ~~(losses)~~ of ~~$8.4~~$(4.3) million and ~~$1.4~~$8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, and ~~$(9.7)~~$(16.4) million and ~~$2.5~~$(9.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, which are included in other ~~(expense) income,~~expense, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

Based on a sensitivity analysis at September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, a 10% change in the foreign currency exchange rates for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 would not have materially impacted our net ~~earnings by approximately $11 million.~~earnings. This calculation assumes that all currencies change in the same direction and proportion relative to the U.S. dollar and that there are no indirect effects, such as changes in non-U.S. dollar sales volumes or prices. This calculation does not take into account the impact of the foreign currency exchange contracts discussed above.

~~Table of Contents~~


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that the information that we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2017. Our management, including~~2018. Based on this evaluation, our ~~current Principal Executive Officer~~principal executive officer and ~~Principal Financial Officer,~~principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective as of September 30, 2017 because of the previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described in Item 9A. Controls and Procedures in our Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Management has concluded that, notwithstanding the material weaknesses referred to above, the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q fairly state, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

~~Remediation Plan~~

In the second quarter of 2017, management became actively engaged in the planning for, and implementation of, remediation efforts to address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting identified above. Management has implemented the following steps in the third quarter of 2017:

~~enhanced the current business process review control procedures to include additional prior period comparisons and additional key ratios, metrics and risk based criteria as determined by management;~~

~~enhanced the detailed site and/or process reviews based on criteria determined by management’s risk assessment including manual journal entries;~~

~~conducted enhanced ethics, controls and policy training for employees at the one non-U.S. site where certain employees engaged in conduct that circumvented controls.~~

Management believes the measures described above and others that may be implemented will remediate the material weaknesses that we have identified. Management is in the process of testing the effectiveness of the revised controls. These material weaknesses cannot be considered fully remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.2018.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~Other than the remediation actions identified above, there were~~There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

3847

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.

We are party to the legal proceedings that are described in Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in "Item 1. Financial Statements" of this Quarterly Report, and such disclosure is incorporated by reference into this "Item 1. Legal Proceedings." In addition to the foregoing, we and our subsidiaries are named defendants in certain other ordinary routine lawsuits incidental to our business and are involved from time to time as parties to governmental proceedings, all arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the outcome of lawsuits or other proceedings involving us and our subsidiaries cannot be predicted with certainty, and the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to such lawsuits or other proceedings cannot be predicted accurately, management does not currently expect the amount of any liability that could arise with respect to these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


Item 1A.	Risk Factors.

There are numerous factors that affect our business and results of operations, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, careful consideration should be given to "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in Part I and "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II of our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report, which contain descriptions of significant factors that might cause the actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently expected or desired.

There have been no material changes in risk factors discussed in our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report and subsequent SEC filings. The risks described in this Quarterly Report, our ~~2016~~2017 Annual Report and in our other SEC filings or press releases from time to time are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties are currently deemed immaterial based on management's assessment of currently available information, which remains subject to change; however, new risks that are currently unknown to us may surface in the future that materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Note 12 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report includes a discussion of our share repurchase program and payment of quarterly dividends on our common stock.

During the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018, we had no repurchases of common shares. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we have $160.7 million of remaining capacity under our current share repurchase program. The following table sets forth the activity for each of the three months during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017:~~2018:


	Total Number of Shares Tendered		Average Price per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program		Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (in millions)			Total Number of Shares Tendered			Average Price per Share				Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program		Maximum Number of Shares (or Approximate Dollar Value) That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (in millions)
Period	Total Number of Shares Tendered		Average Price per Share							Total Number of Shares Tendered
July 1 - 31	320	(1)	$	46.17		—		$	160.7		482		Average Price per Share	(1)	$	40.59		—		$	160.7
August 1 - 31	2,899	(2)	38.35		—		160.7			1,968		(2)	50.14				—		160.7
September 1 - 30	—		—		—		160.7			273		(1)	55.44				—		160.7
Total	3,219		$	39.13	—					2,723			$	48.98			—


(1)	Shares tendered by employees to satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for Restricted Shares.

(2)

Represents ~~419~~135 shares that were tendered by employees to satisfy minimum tax withholding amounts for Restricted Shares at an average price per share of ~~$38.91,~~$49.53, and ~~2,480~~1,833 shares purchased at a price of ~~$38.25~~$50.18 per share by a rabbi trust that we established in connection with our director deferral plans, pursuant to which non-employee directors may elect to defer directors’ quarterly cash compensation to be paid at a later date in the form of common stock.

3948

Table of Contents


Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.


Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.


Item 5.	Other Information.

On November 2, 2018, the Company’s Organization and Compensation Committee approved an amended and restated Change-In-Control Severance Plan (the “CIC Plan”) which provides certain specified severance benefits to the Company’s Named Executive Officers in the event of the loss of their positions following a transaction that involves a change in the ownership or control of the Company. The amendment to the CIC Plan was made to revise eligibility and participation requirements (not affecting the Company’s executive officers), reduce the number of eligible key employees and provide for certain other administrative changes.


Item 6.	Exhibits.



Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Flowserve Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013).

3.2		Flowserve Corporation By-Laws, as amended and restated effective ~~May 18, 2017~~October 2, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated ~~May 24, 2017)~~October 4, 2018).

~~10.1~~10.1+*		~~Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated June 30, 2017, among~~ Flowserve Corporation ~~Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and other lenders referred therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 7, 2017).~~Change In Control Severance Plan, effective November 2, 2018.

31.1+		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2+		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1++		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2++		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

_______________________

+ Filed herewith.

++ Furnished herewith.

* Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this Quarterly Report or 10-Q.

4049

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		FLOWSERVE CORPORATION

Date:	November ~~1, 2017~~7, 2018	/s/ R. Scott Rowe
		R. Scott Rowe
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date:	November ~~1, 2017~~7, 2018	/s/ Lee S. Eckert
		Lee S. Eckert
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

4150