UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-34249

FARMER BROS. CO.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)




Delaware		95-0725980
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1912 Farmer Brothers Drive, Northlake, Texas 76262
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)

888-998-2468
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

13601 North Freeway, Suite 200, Fort Worth, Texas 76177
(Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report

~~13601 North Freeway, Suite 200, Fort Worth, Texas 76177~~

~~(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)~~

~~888-998-2468~~

~~(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ý NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting ~~company”~~company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~



Large accelerated filer	¨	¨	Accelerated filer	ý
Non-accelerated filer	¨	¨ ~~(Do~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨
			Emerging growth company	¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act.	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO ý

As of ~~November 8, 2016,~~May 9, 2017, the registrant had ~~16,793,561~~16,844,216 shares outstanding of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Item 1. Financial Statements	1

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016	1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~	2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~ for the Three and Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~	3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~Nine Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~	4

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2632

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3748

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	4051

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

41Item 1. Legal Proceedings	52

Item 1A. Risk Factors	4152

Item 6. Exhibits	4152

SIGNATURES	4253

EXHIBIT INDEX	4354

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Item 1. Financial Statements

FARMER BROS. CO.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	September 30, 2016			June 30, 2016			March 31, 2017			June 30, 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,502		$	21,095		$	5,727		$	21,095
Short-term investments	26,017			25,591			26,541			25,591
Accounts and notes receivable, net	46,914			44,364			50,426			44,364
Inventories	51,102			46,378			60,712			46,378
Income tax receivable	254			247			293			247
Short-term derivative assets	3,688			3,954			—			3,954
Prepaid expenses	4,210			4,557			4,789			4,557
Assets held for sale	7,083			7,179			—			7,179
Total current assets	155,770			153,365			148,488			153,365
Property, plant and equipment, net	140,674			118,416			171,977			118,416
Goodwill and intangible assets, net	6,441			6,491
Goodwill							9,940			272
Intangible assets, net							19,172			6,219
Other assets	7,781			9,933			7,311			9,933
Deferred income taxes	79,299			80,786			66,046			80,786
Total assets	$	389,965		$	368,991		$	422,934		$	368,991
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	34,837			23,919			45,216			23,919
Accrued payroll expenses	16,499			24,540			18,168			24,540
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility	200			109			44,175			109
Short-term obligations under capital leases	1,261			1,323			1,131			1,323
Sale-leaseback financing obligation	42,765			—
Short-term derivative liabilities							339			—
Other current liabilities	8,042			6,946			7,074			6,946
Total current liabilities	103,604			56,837			116,103			56,837
Accrued pension liabilities	67,522			68,047			67,331			68,047
Accrued postretirement benefits	20,615			20,808			20,183			20,808
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities	11,459			11,459			10,248			11,459
Other long-term liabilities-capital leases	699			1,036			389			1,036
Other long-term liabilities	100			28,210			600			28,210
Total liabilities	$	203,999		$	186,397		$	214,854		$	186,397
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized and none issued	—			—			—			—
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,793,561 and 16,781,561 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively	16,794			16,782
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,841,650 and 16,781,561 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively							16,842			16,782
Additional paid-in capital	40,109			39,096			40,704			39,096
Retained earnings	198,400			196,782			220,070			196,782
Unearned ESOP shares	(6,434		)	(6,434		)	(4,289		)	(6,434		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(62,903		)	(63,632		)	(65,247		)	(63,632		)
Total stockholders’ equity	$	185,966		$	182,594		$	208,080		$	182,594
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	389,965		$	368,991		$	422,934		$	368,991

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FARMER BROS. CO.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net sales	$	130,488		$	133,445		$	138,187		$	134,468		$	407,700		$	410,220
Cost of goods sold	79,290			82,866			84,367			81,908			247,586			254,173
Gross profit	51,198			50,579			53,820			52,560			160,114			156,047
Selling expenses	38,438			36,441			40,377			38,447			117,912			112,741
General and administrative expenses	8,936			9,465			9,196			10,977			31,925			29,951
Restructuring and other transition expenses	3,030			5,450			2,547			3,169			9,542			13,855
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility							—			—			(37,449		)	—
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets	(158		)	—			(272		)	(335		)	(764		)	(5,441		)
Net gains from sales of assets	(1,553		)	(214		)
Net gains from sales of other assets							(86		)	(4		)	(1,525		)	(163		)
Operating expenses	48,693			51,142			51,762			52,254			119,641			150,943
Income (loss) from operations	2,505			(563		)
Income from operations							2,058			306			40,473			5,104
Other income (expense):
Dividend income	265			293			273			288			808			840
Interest income	129			104			147			139			435			359
Interest expense	(389		)	(121		)	(517		)	(111		)	(1,430		)	(341		)
Other, net	191			(875		)	1,044			613			(1,088		)	35
Total other income (expense)	196			(599		)	947			929			(1,275		)	893
Income (loss) before taxes	2,701			(1,162		)
Income tax expense (benefit)	1,083			(88		)
Net income (loss)	$	1,618		$	(1,074	)
Net income (loss) per common share—basic	$	0.10		$	(0.07	)
Net income (loss) per common share—diluted	$	0.10		$	(0.07	)
Income before taxes							3,005			1,235			39,198			5,997
Income tax expense							1,411			43			15,910			318
Net income							$	1,594		$	1,192		$	23,288		$	5,679
Net income per common share—basic							$	0.10		$	0.07		$	1.40		$	0.34
Net income per common share—diluted							$	0.10		$	0.07		$	1.39		$	0.34
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic	16,562,984			16,269,368			16,605,754			16,539,479			16,584,125			16,486,469
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted	16,684,319			16,269,368			16,721,774			16,647,415			16,704,200			16,614,275

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FARMER BROS. CO.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~ (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

Three Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015
Net income (loss) $ 1,618
$ (1,074 )
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges 444
(4,640 )
Losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold 285
4,968
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax $ 2,347
$ (746 )



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	1,594		$	1,192		$	23,288		$	5,679
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges	104			(1,245		)	(1,249		)	(5,575		)
(Gains) losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold	(516		)	2,677			(366		)	11,504
Total comprehensive income, net of tax	$	1,182		$	2,624		$	21,673		$	11,608

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

													FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)							CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	1,618		$	(1,074	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income							$	23,288		$	5,679
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:							Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	5,008			5,295			16,613			15,721
Provision for doubtful accounts	507			44
(Recovery of) provision for doubtful accounts							(44		)	432
Interest on sale-leaseback financing obligation	310			—			681			—
Restructuring and other transition expenses, net of payments	869			2,889			2,191			(1,939		)
Deferred income taxes	1,488			(19		)	15,766			72
Net gains from sales of assets	(1,711		)	(214		)
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility							(37,449		)	—
Net gains from sales of Spice Assets and other assets							(2,289		)	(5,604		)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense	942			1,229			2,996			3,488
Net losses on derivative instruments and investments	282			5,839			793			11,839
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	—			(272		)	—			1,002
Purchases of trading securities held for investment	(1,466		)	(518		)	(4,216		)	(5,938		)
Proceeds from sales of trading securities held for investment	1,259			1,202			2,911			4,909
Accounts and notes receivable	(3,100		)	(1,805		)	(3,994		)	(6,503		)
Inventories	(4,724		)	(6,446		)	(13,242		)	(4,452		)
Income tax receivable	(7		)	(262		)	(46		)	(70		)
Derivative assets (liabilities), net	2,783			(5,094		)	3,845			(11,580		)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	195			966			(203		)	865
Accounts payable	7,343			11,493			11,293			(997		)
Accrued payroll expenses and other current liabilities	(7,057		)	(1,514		)	(5,712		)	3,209
Accrued postretirement benefits	(192		)	34			(624		)	(384		)
Other long-term liabilities	(525		)	(365		)	(2,028		)	(337		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,822		$	11,408		$	10,530		$	9,412
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired							$	(25,853	)	$	—
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(10,196		)	(3,781		)	(35,497		)	(16,193		)
Purchases of construction-in-progress assets for New Facility	(14,354		)	—			(26,653		)	(13,492		)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment	2,014			538			3,984			5,990
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(22,536	)	$	(3,243	)	$	(84,019	)	$	(23,695	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility	$	91		$	—
Repayments on revolving credit facility	—			(28		)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing obligation	42,455			—
Proceeds from New Facility lease financing	7,662			—
Repayments of New Facility lease financing	(35,772		)	—
Payments of capital lease obligations	(399		)	(865		)
Payment of financing costs	—			(8		)
Proceeds from stock option exercises	84			341
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	14,121		$	(560	)
(continued on next page)	(continued on next page)						(continued on next page)

												FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)						CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015		2017			2016
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(4,593	)	$	7,605
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolving credit facility						$	67,583		$	314
Repayments on revolving credit facility						(23,517		)	(86		)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing obligation						42,455			—
Proceeds from New Facility lease financing						7,662			13,492
Repayments of New Facility lease financing						(35,772		)	—
Payments of capital lease obligations						(1,107		)	(2,710		)
Payment of financing costs						—			(8		)
Proceeds from stock option exercises						823			1,610
Tax withholding payment - net share settlement of equity awards						(6		)	(159		)
Net cash provided by financing activities						$	58,121		$	12,453
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents						$	(15,368	)	$	(1,830	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	21,095			15,160		21,095			15,160
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	16,502		$	22,765	$	5,727		$	13,330

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
    Equipment acquired under capital leases $ —
$ 9
        Net change in derivative assets and liabilities
           included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
$ 729
$ 328
Construction-in-progress assets under New Facility lease $ —
$ 1,982
New Facility lease obligation $ —
$ 2,768
    Non-cash additions to equipment $ 4,149
$ 150
    Non-cash portion of earnout recognized $ 158
$ —



Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Equipment acquired under capital leases	$	353		$	190
Net change in derivative assets and liabilities included in other comprehensive income, net of tax	$	(1,615	)	$	5,929
Construction-in-progress assets under New Facility lease	$	—		$	5,662
New Facility lease obligation	$	—		$	5,662
Non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment	$	8,515		$	1,576
Non-cash portion of earnout receivable recognized-Spice Assets sale	$	229		$	335
Non-cash portion of earnout payable recognized-China Mist acquisition	$	500		$	—
Non-cash portion of earnout payable recognized-West Coast Coffee acquisition	$	600		$	—
Option costs paid with exercised shares	$	174		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

FARMER BROS. CO.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Presentation

Overview

Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” or “Farmer Bros.”), is a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products. The Company serves a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurant and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand coffee and ~~consumer-branded~~consumer-facing branded coffee and tea products. The Company’s product categories consist of roast and ground coffee; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. The Company was founded in 1912, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. The Company operates in one business segment.

The Company operates production facilities in Northlake, Texas (the "New Facility"); Houston, Texas; Portland, ~~Oregon~~Oregon; Hillsboro, Oregon; and ~~Houston, Texas.~~Scottsdale, Arizona. Distribution takes place out of the New Facility, the Portland, ~~facility~~Hillsboro and Scottsdale facilities, as well as separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; ~~Oklahoma City, Oklahoma;~~ and Moonachie, New Jersey. On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of certain property, including the Company’s former headquarters in Torrance, California (the “Torrance Facility”) and leased it back. ~~As of September 30, 2016,~~The Company vacated the Torrance Facility ~~continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of~~after transitioning the Company’s remaining Torrance operations to its other ~~facilities.~~facilities and concluded the leaseback arrangement as of December 31, 2016. The Company commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

The Company’s products reach its customers primarily in two ways: through the Company’s nationwide direct-store-delivery, or DSD, network of ~~450~~646 delivery routes and ~~107~~114 branch warehouses as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. The Company operates a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver its products, and relies on third-party logistic (“3PL”) service providers for its long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” by the Company to its customers at their places of business.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation ~~S‑X.~~S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise indicated) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial data have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017. Events occurring subsequent to ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 14, 2016 (the "2016 Form 10-K").

Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries FBC Finance Company, a California corporation, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation, the parent company of Coffee Bean International, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“CBI”), CBI and ~~CBI.~~China Mist Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from those estimates.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

For a detailed discussion about the Company's significant accounting policies, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K.

During the ~~current~~ three ~~month period,~~months ended March 31, 2017, other than the following, there were no significant updates made to the Company's significant accounting policies.

~~Property, Plant~~Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting. The purchase price of each business acquired is allocated to the tangible and ~~Equipment~~

~~Effective July 1, 2016, with~~intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on information regarding their respective fair values on the date of acquisition. Any excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the separately identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill. Management determines the fair values used in purchase price allocations for intangible assets based on historical data, estimated discounted future cash flows, and expected ~~completion~~royalty rates for trademarks and ~~move~~trade names, as well as certain other information. The valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires a number of judgments and is subject to ~~a newly constructed corporate headquarters along with new manufacturing~~revision as additional information about the fair value of assets and ~~distribution facilities,~~liabilities becomes available. Additional information, which existed as of the acquisition date but unknown to the Company ~~updated~~at that time, may become known during the ~~useful lives~~remainder of the measurement period, a period not to exceed twelve months from the acquisition date. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. If such an adjustment is required, the Company will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines the amount of the adjustment, including the effect on earnings of any amounts it would have recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Transaction costs, including legal and accounting expenses, are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations. Contingent consideration, such as earnout, is deferred as a short-term or long-term liability based on an estimate of the timing of the future payment. These contingent consideration liabilities are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date and are re-measured quarterly based on the then assessed fair value and adjusted if necessary. The results of operations of businesses acquired are included in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements from their dates of acquisition. See Note 3.

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets

The Company accounts for its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”). Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but instead are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change which indicate that an asset might be impaired. Pursuant to ASC 350, the Company performs a qualitative assessment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on its consolidated balance sheets, to determine if there is a more likely than not indication that its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired as of June 30. If the indicators of impairment are present, the Company performs a quantitative assessment to determine the impairment of these assets as of the measurement date.

Testing for impairment of goodwill is a two-step process. The first step requires the Company to compare the fair value of its ~~assets~~reporting units to ~~reflect industry standard useful lives. The following useful lives are used prospectively for property, plant and equipment added after June 30, 2016:~~



~~Buildings and facilities~~	~~10 to 30 years~~
~~Machinery and equipment~~	~~3 to 10 years~~
~~Equipment under capital leases~~	~~Term of lease~~
~~Office furniture and equipment~~	~~5 to 7 years~~
~~Capitalized software~~	~~3 to 5 years~~

~~Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over~~ the ~~lesser~~carrying value of the ~~estimated useful life~~reporting units, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, goodwill of the ~~asset or the remaining lease term. When assets are sold or retired, the asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective account balances and any gain or loss on disposal~~reporting unit is ~~included in operations. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and betterments are capitalized.~~

Assets to be disposed of by sale are recorded as held for sale at the lower of carrying value or estimated net realizable value. The Company considers properties to be assets held for sale when (1) management commits to a plan to sell the property; (2) it is unlikely that the disposal plan will be significantly modified or discontinued; (3) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition; (4) actions required to complete the sale of the property have been initiated; (5) sale of the property is probablepotentially impaired and the Company ~~expects~~then completes step two to measure the ~~completed sale will occur within one year;~~impairment loss, if any. The second step requires the calculation of the implied fair value of goodwill, which is the residual fair value remaining after deducting the fair value of all tangible and ~~(6)~~intangible net assets of the ~~property~~reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit. If the implied fair value of goodwill is ~~actively being marketed~~less than the carrying amount of goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for ~~sale at a price that~~impairment by comparing their fair values to their carrying values. An impairment charge is ~~reasonable given~~recorded if the ~~Company's estimate of current market value. Upon designation of a property as an asset held for sale, the Company records the property’s value at the lower of its carrying value or its~~ estimated fair value of such assets has decreased below their carrying values. There were no indefinite-lived intangible asset or goodwill impairment charges recorded in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Other Intangible Assets

Other intangible assets consist of finite-lived intangible assets including acquired recipes, non-compete agreements, customer relationships, trade names and trademarks. These assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment by grouping them with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated ~~costs to sell and ceases depreciation. See~~ ~~Note 6~~.fair value in the period in which the determination is made. The Company reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. There were no other intangible asset impairment charges recorded in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016.

Leases

Leases are categorized as either operating or capital leases at inception. Operating lease costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. An asset and a corresponding liability for the capital lease obligation are established for the cost of a capital lease. Capital lease obligations are amortized over the life of the lease.

For build-to-suit leases, the Company establishes an asset and liability for the estimated construction costs incurred to the extent that it is involved in the construction of structural improvements or takes construction risk prior to the commencement of the lease. A portion of the lease arrangement is allocated to the land for which the Company accrues rent expense during the construction period. The amount of rent expense to be accrued is determined using the fair value of the leased land at construction commencement and the Company’s incremental borrowing rate, and recognized on a straight-line basis. Upon exercise of the purchase option on a build-to-suit lease, the Company records an asset equal to the value of the option price that includes the value of the land and reverses the rent expense and the asset and liability established to record the construction costs incurred through the date of option exercise.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

See Note 5.

Coffee Brewing Equipment and Service

The Company classifies certain expenses related to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as cost of goods sold. These costs include the cost of the equipment as well as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of revenues from its customers. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $7.0 million. Coffee brewing equipment costs included in cost of goods sold in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $19.9 million and $20.4 million, respectively.

The Company capitalizes coffee brewing equipment and depreciates it over an estimated three or five year period, depending on the assessment of the useful life and reports the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in each of the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $6.5 million. In addition,Such depreciation expense related to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2.3 million and ~~2015 was~~ $2.4 million, respectively, and ~~$2.5~~$6.9 million ~~respectively.~~and $7.5 million, respectively, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machinery and equipment) in the amounts of ~~$3.2~~$8.3 million and ~~$1.6~~$5.7 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively.

Net Income ~~(Loss)~~ Per Common Share

Computation of net income per share ("EPS") for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 includes the dilutive effect of ~~121,335~~116,020 and 107,936 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the ~~three months ended September 30, 2016,~~applicable period, but excludes the dilutive effect of ~~19,800~~30,401 and 59,854 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company's common stock on the last trading day of the ~~three months ended September 30, 2016~~applicable period because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Computation of EPS for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015 excludes a total~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 includes the dilutive effect of ~~512,842~~120,075 and 127,806 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes 25,508 and 35,253 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period because ~~the Company incurred a net loss and including them~~their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. See Note 1719.

~~Dividends~~

~~The Company’s Board of Directors has omitted the payment of a quarterly dividend since the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The amount, if any, of dividends~~Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to be paid in the future will depend upon the Company’s then available cash, anticipated cash needs, overall financial condition, credit agreement restrictions, future prospects for earnings and cash flows, as well as other relevant factors.Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs incurred through outside carriers are recorded as a component of the Company's selling expenses and were ~~$4.8~~$6.0 million and ~~$2.2~~$3.0 million, respectively, in the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, and ~~2015. Shipping~~$17.2 million and $7.9 million, respectively, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. With the Company’s move to 3PL for its long-haul distribution in the third quarter of fiscal 2016, payroll, benefits, vehicle costs and other costs associated with the Company’s internal operation of its long-haul distribution previously included elsewhere in selling expenses are now represented in outsourced shipping and handling costs in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017. The amount associated with outside carriers for the Company's long-haul distribution recorded in shipping and handling costs in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 include costs related to~~March 31, 2017 was approximately the same in the three months ended March 31, 2016. The amount associated with outside carriers for the Company's ~~move to 3PL for its~~ long-haul ~~operations.~~distribution recorded in shipping and handling costs in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 was less than the comparable aggregate operating costs associated with internally managing the Company’s long-haul distribution in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

No new accounting standards were adopted by the Company in the three months ended March 31, 2017.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~September 2015,~~March 2017, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB")~~FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015-16, “Business Combinations~~2017-07, "Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic ~~805)~~715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost" ("ASU 2017-07"). ASU 2017-07 amends the requirements in GAAP related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The guidance in ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption will not have a significant impact on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the ~~Accounting~~Test for ~~Measurement-Period Adjustments” (“~~Goodwill Impairment" ("ASU ~~2015-16”~~2017-04"). The amendments in ASU ~~2015-16 eliminates~~2017-04 address concerns regarding the ~~requirement that an acquirer in~~cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, and remove the second step of the test. An entity will apply a ~~business combination account for measurement-period adjustments retrospectively. Instead, an acquirer will recognize a measurement-period adjustment during the period in which it determines~~one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the ~~adjustment, including~~excess of a reporting unit's carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the ~~effect on earnings~~total amount of ~~any amounts it would have recorded~~goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. The new guidance does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. The guidance in ~~previous periods if~~ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and is effective for the ~~accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. The~~ Company ~~adopted ASU 2015-16~~ beginning July 1, ~~2016.~~2020. Adoption of ASU ~~2015-16 did~~2017-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In ~~July 2015,~~January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015-12, “Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans~~2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965), (Part I) Fully Benefit-Responsive Investment Contracts, (Part II) Plan Investment Disclosures, (Part III) Measurement Date Practical Expedient”805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business" ("ASU ~~2015-12”~~2017-01"). The amendments in ASU ~~2015-12 eliminates requirements that employee benefit plans measure~~2017-01 clarify the ~~fair value~~definition of ~~fully benefit-responsive investment contracts ("FBRICs")~~a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses and provide a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is not a business. If the ~~related fair value disclosures. As~~screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a ~~result, FBRICs are measured, presented~~business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and ~~disclosed only at contract value. Also, plans will be required~~a substantive process that together significantly contribute to ~~disaggregate their investments measured using fair value by general type, either on~~ the ~~face~~ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace the financial statements or in the notes, and self-directed brokerage accounts are one general type. Plans no longer have to disclose the net appreciation/depreciation in fair value of investments by general type or individual investments equal to or greater than 5% of net assets available for benefits. In addition, a plan with a fiscal year end that does not coincide with the end of a calendar month is allowed to measure its

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

investments and investment-related accounts using the month end closest to its fiscal year end. The new guidance for FBRICs and plan investment disclosures should be applied retrospectively. The measurement date practical expedient should be applied prospectively.missing elements. The guidance in ASU 2017-01 is effective for ~~fiscal years~~public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2015, with early adoption permitted. The~~2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2017-01 is effective for the Company ~~adopted ASU 2015-12~~ beginning July 1, ~~2016.~~2018. Adoption of ASU ~~2015-12 did~~2017-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In ~~May 2015,~~November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015-07, “Fair Value Measurement~~2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic ~~820)~~230): ~~Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)” (“~~Restricted Cash" ("ASU ~~2015-07”~~2016-18"). The amendments require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2015-07 removes the requirement to categorize investments for which the fair values are measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient within the fair value hierarchy. It also limits certain disclosures to investments for which the entity has elected to measure the fair value using the practical expedient. ASU 2015-072016-18 is effective for ~~fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,~~the Company beginning ~~after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-07 beginning~~

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

July 1, ~~2016.~~2018. Adoption of ASU ~~2015-07 did~~2016-18 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

~~New Accounting Pronouncements~~

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"). ASU 2016-09 is being issued as part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)" ("ASU 2016-02"), which introduces a new lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the balance sheet. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize a lease liability, which represents the discounted obligation to make future minimum lease payments and a related right-of-use asset. For public business entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. ~~We are~~The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on ~~our~~its consolidated financial statements and ~~expect~~expects the adoption will have a ~~material~~significant impact on the Company's financial position resulting from the increase in assets and liabilities.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Under ASU 2016-01, entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale equity securities in other comprehensive income, and they will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. The guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories (that is trading or available for sale) is no longer required. ASU 2016-01 eliminates certain disclosure requirements related to financial instruments measured at amortized cost and adds disclosures related to the measurement categories of financial assets and financial liabilities. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU ~~2016-01. The adoption of this guidance~~2016-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities will continue to apply their existing impairment models to inventories that are accounted for using last-in first-out or LIFO and the retail inventory method or RIM. Under current guidance, net realizable value is one of several calculations an entity needs to make to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. ASU 2015-11 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2015-11 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers under ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” ("ASU 2014-09"). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. On July 9, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date," which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year allowing early adoption as of the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The deferral results in the new accounting standard being effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2014-09 along with the related amendments and interpretations issued under ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU ~~2016-12~~2016-20 on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern" ("ASU 2014-15"). ASU 2014-15 amended ASC 205-40-Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern and requires management to evaluate

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are available to be issued and provide related disclosures of such conditions and events. The amendments in ASU 2014-15 apply to all entities and are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. Adoption of ASU 2014-15 will not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Note 3. Acquisitions

China Mist Brands, Inc.

On October 11, 2016, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas. The acquisition of China Mist is expected to extend the Company's tea product offerings and give the Company a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. As part of the transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing 17,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. The Company acquired China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of $11.7 million, which included $11.2 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $0.4 million and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. This contingent earnout liability is currently estimated to have a fair value of $0.5 million and is recorded in other current liabilities on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid within the next twelve months.

In the nine months ended March 31, 2017, the Company incurred $0.2 million in transaction costs related to the China Mist acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company's consolidated results of operations.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:



(In thousands)	Fair Value			Estimated Useful Life (years)

Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	11,183
Contingent consideration	500
Total consideration	$	11,683

Accounts receivable	$	811
Inventory	544
Prepaid assets	48
Property, plant and equipment	212
Goodwill	1,871
Intangible assets:
Recipes	930			7
Non-compete agreement	100			5
Customer relationships	450			10
Trade name/Trademark—finite-lived	7,100			10
Accounts payable	(383		)
Total consideration, net of cash acquired	$	11,683

In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $1.9 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $8.6 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included recipes, a non-compete agreement, customer relationships and a trade name/trademark. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 9.6 years.

The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.

The fair value assigned to the recipes was determined utilizing the replacement cost method, which captures the direct cost of the development effort plus lost profits over the time to re-create the recipes.

The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreement in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreement in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of China Mist's non-compete agreement.

The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate and utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships.

The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.

West Coast Coffee Company, Inc.

On February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. (“West Coast Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels. The acquisition of West Coast Coffee is expected to broaden the Company's reach in the Northwestern United States. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing 20,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of 24,150 square feet in Oregon, California

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. The Company acquired West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.7 million, which included $14.7 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. This contingent earnout liability is currently estimated to have a fair value of $0.6 million and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid within the next twenty-four months.

In the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017, the Company incurred $0.3 million in transaction costs related to the West Coast Coffee acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and accounting expenses, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:



(In thousands)	Fair Value			Estimated Useful Life (years)

Cash paid, net of cash acquired	$	14,671
Contingent consideration	600
Total consideration	$	15,271

Accounts receivable	$	955
Inventory	939
Prepaid assets	20
Property, plant and equipment	1,546
Goodwill	7,797
Intangible assets:
Non-compete agreements	100			5
Customer relationships	4,400			10
Trade name—finite-lived	260			7
Brand name—finite-lived	250			1.7
Accounts payable	(814		)
Other liabilities	(182		)
Total consideration, net of cash acquired	$	15,271

The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change based on numerous factors, including the final adjusted purchase price and the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $7.8 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $5.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included non-compete agreements, customer relationships, a trade name and a brand name. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 9.3 years.

The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreements was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

with the agreements in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreements in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of West Coast Coffee's non-compete agreements.

The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.

The fair values assigned to the trade name and the brand name were determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method is based on the premise that the intangible asset owner would be willing to pay a royalty rate to license the subject asset. The analysis involves forecasting revenue over the life of the asset, applying a royalty rate and a tax rate, and then discounting the savings back to present value at an appropriate discount rate.

Note 4. Restructuring Plans

Corporate Relocation Plan

On February 5, 2015, the Company announced a plan (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”) to close ~~its~~the Torrance ~~California facility~~Facility and relocate its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to ~~a new facility~~the New Facility housing these operations ~~currently under construction~~ in Northlake, ~~Texas (the “New Facility”).~~Texas. Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance Facility closure. The Company’s decision resulted from a comprehensive review of alternatives designed to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities.

Based on current assumptions and subject to continued implementation of the Corporate Relocation Plan, the Company estimates that it will incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the exit of the Torrance Facility consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 consisted of $0.4 million in employee retention and separation benefits, ~~$2.2~~$0.6 million in facility-related costs including costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters and the relocation of certain distribution operations and $0.3 million in other related costs including travel, legal, consulting and other professional services. Facility-related costs in the three months ended March 31, 2017 also included $22,000 in non-cash depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities.

Expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 consisted of $1.1 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5.9 million in facility-related costs including lease of temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters and the relocation of certain distribution operations and ~~$0.4~~$1.3 million in other related costs including travel, legal, consulting and other professional services. Facility-related costs in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 also included ~~$0.8~~$2.5 million in non-cash ~~depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities.~~

~~The following table sets forth the activity~~charges, including $1.1 million in ~~liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2016:~~

(In thousands)
Balances,
June 30, 2016
Additions Payments Non-Cash Settled Adjustments
Balances,
September 30, 2016
Employee-related costs(1) $ 2,342
$ 400
$ 1,146
$ —
$ —
$ 1,596
Facility-related costs(2) —
2,194
579
757
—
858
Other(3) 200
436
636
—
—
—
Total(2) $ 2,542
$ 3,030
$ 2,361
$ 757
$ —
$ 2,454
Current portion $ 2,542
$ 2,454
Non-current portion $ —
$ —
Total $ 2,542
$ 2,454

~~_______________~~

~~(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.~~

~~(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent~~ depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.

The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan for the nine months ended March 31, 2017:



(In thousands)	Balances, June 30, 2016		Additions		Payments		Non-Cash Settled		Adjustments		Balances, March 31, 2017
Employee-related costs(1)	$	2,342	$	1,109	$	2,616	$	—	$	—	$	835
Facility-related costs(2)	—		5,850		3,375		2,475		—		—
Other(3)	200		1,294		1,494		—		—		—
Total(2)	$	2,542	$	8,253	$	7,485	$	2,475	$	—	$	835
Current portion	$	2,542									$	835
Non-current portion	$	—									$	—
Total	$	2,542									$	835

_______________

(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

included in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance ~~sheets.~~sheets and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.

(3) Included in “Accounts payable” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company estimated that it would incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company has recognized a total of ~~$28.0 million of the estimated $31~~$31.5 million in aggregate cash costs including ~~$16.6~~$17.4 million in employee retention and separation benefits, ~~$4.5~~$6.7 million in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters, relocation of the Company’s Torrance operations and certain distribution operations

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

and ~~$6.8~~$7.4 million in other related costs. The ~~remainder is expected~~Company expects to ~~be recognized~~complete the Corporate Relocation Plan and recognize an additional $0.1 million in other-related costs in the ~~second and third quarters~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company also recognized from inception through ~~September 30, 2016 $2.0 million in~~March 31, 2017 non-cash depreciation expense of $2.3 million associated with the Torrance production ~~facility.~~facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. The Company may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.

The following table sets forth the activity in liabilities associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan from the time of adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016:~~March 31, 2017:


(In thousands)	Balances, June 30, 2014		Additions		Payments		Non-Cash Settled		Adjustments		Balances, September 30, 2016		Balances, June 30, 2014		Additions		Payments		Non-Cash Settled		Adjustments		Balances, March 31, 2017
Employee-related costs(1)	$	—	$	16,643	$	15,047	$	—	$	—	$	1,596	$	—	$	17,352	$	16,517	$	—	$	—	$	835
Facility-related costs(2)	—		6,535		3,664		2,013		—		858		—		10,442		6,711		3,731		—		—
Other~~(3)~~	—		6,817		6,817		—		—		—		—		7,424		7,424		—		—		—
Total(2)	$	—	$	29,995	$	25,528	$	2,013	$	—	$	2,454	$	—	$	35,218	$	30,652	$	3,731	$	—	$	835

_______________

(1) Included in “Accrued payroll expenses” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

(2) Non-cash settled facility-related costs represent (a) depreciation expense associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and included in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance ~~sheets.~~sheets and (b) non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility.

~~(3) Included~~

DSD Restructuring Plan

On February 21, 2017, the Company announced a restructuring plan to reorganize its DSD operations in ~~“Accounts payable”~~an effort to realign functions into a channel based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results (the “DSD Restructuring Plan”). The strategic decision to undertake the DSD Restructuring Plan resulted from an ongoing operational review of various initiatives within the DSD selling organization. The Company expects to complete the DSD Restructuring Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018.

The Company estimates that it will recognize approximately $3.7 million to $4.9 million of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately $1.9 million to $2.7 million in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and $1.8 million to $2.2 million in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. The Company may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or associated with, the DSD Restructuring Plan.

Expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 consisted of $0.9 million in employee-related costs and $0.4 million in other related costs. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had paid a total of $0.1 million of these costs and had a balance of $1.2 million in DSD Restructuring Plan-related liabilities on the Company's condensed consolidated balance ~~sheets.~~sheet.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 4.5. New Facility

Lease Agreement and Purchase Option Exercise

On June 15, 2016, the Company exercised the purchase option to purchase the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, as amended (the "Lease Agreement"). On September 15, 2016 ("Purchase Option Closing Date"), the Company closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred as of the Purchase Option Closing Date plus the option exercise fee, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. Upon closing of the purchase option, the Company recorded the aggregate purchase price of the New Facility in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on its consolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in "Property, plant and equipment, net," the offsetting liability for the lease obligation included in "Other long-term liabilities" and the rent expense related to the land were reversed. Concurrent with the purchase option closing, on September 15, 2016, the Company terminated the Lease Agreement. The Company did not pay any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Lease Agreement.

Based on the final budget, the Company estimates that the total construction costs including the cost of land for the New Facility will be approximately $55 million to $60 million, of which the Company has spent $42.5 million as of September 30, 2016. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility are expected to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

Development Management Agreement

In conjunction with the Lease Agreement, the Company also entered into a Development Management Agreement with an affiliate of Stream Realty Partners (the ~~‘DMA”~~"DMA") to manage, coordinate, represent, assist and advise the Company on matters from the pre-development through construction of the New Facility. Pursuant to the DMA, the Company will pay the developer a development fee, an oversight fee and a development services fee the amounts of which are included in the construction costs incurred-to-date. ~~An incentive fee, the amount of which will be determined by the developer and the Company, will also be payable if final completion occurs prior to the scheduled completion date.~~

~~New Facility Construction~~Amended Building Contract

On September 17, 2016, the Company and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between the Company and Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the "Amended Building Contract").

Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, Builder will provide pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility (the “Project”). The Company has engaged other designers and builders to provide traditional construction work on the Project site, including for the foundation, building envelope and roof of the New Facility.

Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, the Company will pay Builder up to ~~$21.4~~$21.9 million for Builder’s services in connection with the Project. This amount is a guaranteed maximum price and is ~~subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Building Contract. The Company has paid $7.0 million towards these services as of September 30, 2016 (see~~ ~~Note 18), The date for substantial completion of Builder’s work on the Project is February 9, 2017, which is also~~ subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Amended Building Contract. The Amended Building Contract includes an “IDB Work Contract Schedule,” which sets forth interim milestones, durations and material dates in relation to the performance and timing of Builder’s work. The Amended Building Contract includes remedies for the Company in the event agreed milestone dates relating to Builder’s services are not met. The Amended Building Contract is subject to customary undertakings, covenants, obligations, rights and conditions. The Builder’s work on the Project was substantially completed as of March 31, 2017.

~~Machinery~~New Facility Costs

Based on the current forecast, the Company estimates that the total construction costs including the cost of land for the New Facility will be approximately $60 million of which the Company has paid an aggregate of $54.7 million as of March 31, 2017 and ~~Equipment, Furniture and Fixtures~~

has outstanding contractual obligations of $5.5 million as of March 31, 2017 (see Note 20). In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, the Company estimates that it will incur approximately $35 million to $39 million for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related ~~expenditures. As~~expenditures of ~~September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016,~~which the Company ~~had spent $12.7~~has paid an aggregate of $20.2 million as of March 31, 2017, including $15.7 million under the Amended Building Contract, and ~~$5.9~~has outstanding contractual obligations of $6.2 million ~~respectively, toward the purchase~~as of ~~machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures for the New Facility.~~March 31, 2017 (see Note 20). The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures for the New Facility ~~are expected~~

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to beUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

were incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility were substantially completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

Note 5.6. Sales of Assets

Sale of Spice Assets

In order to focus on its core products, on December 8, 2015, the Company completed the sale of the Spice Assets to Harris Spice Company ("Harris"). Harris acquired substantially all of the Company’s personal property used exclusively in connection with the manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products (collectively, the "Spice Assets"), including certain equipment; trademarks, tradenames and other intellectual property assets; contract rights under sales and purchase orders and certain other agreements; and a list of certain customers, other than the Company’s DSD customers, and assumed certain liabilities relating to the Spice Assets. The Company received $6.0 million in cash at closing, and is eligible to receive an earnout amount of up to $5.0 million over a ~~three year~~three-year period based upon a percentage of certain institutional spice sales by Harris following the closing. The Company recognized ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million and $0.8 million in earnout during the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, respectively, a portion of which is included in "Net gains from sale of Spice Assets" in the Company's condensed consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations. The sale of the Spice Assets does not represent a strategic shift for the Company and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's results

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

of operations because the Company will continue to sell a complete portfolio of spice and other culinary products purchased from Harris under a supply agreement to its DSD customers.

Sale of Torrance Facility

On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the previously-announced sale of the Torrance Facility, consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million.

Following the closing of the sale, the Company leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, ~~subject to~~and exercised two one-month extensions ~~at the Company’s option,~~ at a base rent of $100,000 per ~~month (see~~ ~~Note 19). If~~month. In accordance with ASC 840, “Leases,” due to the Company’s continuing involvement with the property, the Company ~~is not able to vacate~~accounted for the ~~property by~~transaction as a financing transaction, deferred the ~~end~~gain on sale of the ~~second extended period,~~Torrance Facility and recorded the ~~month-to-month base rent will increase to $200,000.~~net sale proceeds of $42.5 million and accrued non-cash interest expense on the financing transaction in "Sale-leaseback financing obligation" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016. The Company vacated the Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. See Note 67. As a result, at December 31, 2016, the financing transaction qualified for sales recognition under ASC 840. Accordingly, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized the net gain from sale of the Torrance Facility in the amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.7 million and non-cash rent expense of $1.4 million, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in "Other current liabilities" and removed the amounts recorded in "Assets held for sale" and the "Sale-leaseback financing obligation" on its consolidated balance sheet.

Sale of Northern California Branch Property

On September 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its branch property in Northern California for a sale price of $2.2 million and leased it back through March 31, 2017, at a base rent of $10,000 per month. The Company recognized a net gain on sale of the Northern California property ~~as of September 30, 2016~~in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 in the amount of $2.0 million.

Note 6.7. Assets Held for Sale

The Company had designated its Torrance Facility and one of its branch properties in Northern California as assets held for sale and recorded the carrying values of these properties in the aggregate amount of $7.2 million in "Assets held for sale" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2016.

~~On July 15, 2016, the Company~~ As of March 31, 2017, these assets were sold ~~the Torrance Facility and entered into a monthly leaseback pending the transition of its remaining Torrance operations to its other facilities~~ (see Note 56). In accordance with ASC 840, “Leases,” due to the Company’s continuing involvement with the property, the Company accounted for the transaction as a financing transaction. Accordingly, the Company has deferred the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility and recorded the net sale proceeds of $42.5 million and accrued non- cash interest expense on the financing transaction of $0.3 million in "Sale-leaseback financing obligation" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016. The non-cash accrued interest will be included in the computation of the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility upon conclusion of the leaseback arrangement. The non-cash rent expense on the property representing the rent for the zero base rent period, recorded in "Other current liabilities" on the Company's balance sheet at September 30, 2016, will also be included in the computation of the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility upon conclusion of the leaseback arrangement. The net book value of the Torrance Facility in the amount of $7.1 million is included as "Assets held for sale" on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2016.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

Note 7.8. Derivative Instruments

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Derivative Instruments Held

Coffee-Related Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with its price to be fixed green coffee purchase contracts, which are described further in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K. The Company utilizes forward and option contracts to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted purchases of green coffee attributable to commodity price risk. Certain of these coffee-related derivative instruments utilized for risk management purposes have been designated as cash flow hedges, while other coffee-related derivative instruments have not been designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting despite hedging the Company's future cash flows on an economic basis.

The following table summarizes the notional volumes for the coffee-related derivative instruments held by the Company at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016:


(In thousands)	September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Long coffee pounds	14,288		32,550		11,663		32,550
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:
Long coffee pounds	1,537		1,618		873		1,618
Less: Short coffee pounds	(375	)	(188	)	(713	)	(188	)
Total	15,450		33,980		11,823		33,980

Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 will expire within 1512 months.

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Financial Statements

Balance Sheets

Fair values of derivative instruments on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets:


	Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges				Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges				Derivative Instruments Designated as Cash Flow Hedges				Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
	September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Financial Statement Location:
Short-term derivative assets:
Coffee-related derivative instruments	$	3,565	$	3,771	$	123	$	183	$	522	$	3,771	$	1	$	183
Long-term derivative assets(1):
Coffee-related derivative instruments	$	343	$	2,575	$	—	$	57	$	—	$	2,575	$	—	$	57
Short-term derivative liabilities:
Coffee-related derivative instruments									$	326	$	—	$	536	$	—

________________

(1) Included in "Other assets" on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Statements of Operations

The following table presents pretax net gains and losses for the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) “AOCI,” “Cost of goods sold” and “Other, net”:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Financial Statement Classification	Three Months Ended March 31,					Nine Months Ended March 31,						Financial Statement Classification
(In thousands)	2016			2015			Financial Statement Classification	2017		2016			2017			2016			Financial Statement Classification
Net gains (losses) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion)	$	726		$	(4,640	)	AOCI
Net losses recognized in earnings (effective portion)	$	(466	)	$	(4,968	)	Costs of goods sold
Net gains (losses) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (effective portion)								$	188	$	(1,245	)	$	(2,029	)	$	(5,575	)	AOCI
Net gains (losses) recognized in earnings (effective portion)								$	865	$	(2,677	)	$	614		$	(11,504	)	Costs of goods sold
Net gains (losses) recognized in earnings (ineffective portion)	$	13		$	(356	)	Other, net	$	90	$	(84	)	$	63		$	(568	)	Other, net

For the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ there were no gains or losses recognized in earnings as a result of excluding amounts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or as a result of reclassifications to earnings following the discontinuance of any cash flow hedges.

Gains and losses on derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are included in “Other, net” in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and in “Net losses ~~(gains)~~ on derivative instruments and investments” in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Net gains and losses recorded in “Other, net” are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,				Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2017		2016		2017			2016
Net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments	$	(35	)	$	(727	)
Net gains (losses) on coffee-related derivative instruments							$	188	$	239	$	(1,052	)	$	(455	)
Net gains (losses) on investments	227			(147		)	738		2		(354		)	120
Net gains (losses) on derivative instruments and investments(1)	192			(874		)	926		241		(1,406		)	(335		)
Other losses, net	(1		)	(1		)
Other gains (losses), net							118		372		318			370
Other, net	$	191		$	(875	)	$	1,044	$	613	$	(1,088	)	$	35

___________

(1) Excludes net losses and net gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recorded in cost of goods sold in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and ~~2015.~~2016.

Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities

The Company has agreements in place that allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and liabilities at settlement or in the event of default under the agreements. Additionally, the Company maintains accounts with its brokers to facilitate financial derivative transactions in support of its risk management activities. Based on the value of the Company’s positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to deposit cash into these broker accounts.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

The following table presents the Company’s net exposure from its offsetting derivative asset and liability ~~positions[, as well as cash collateral on deposit with its counterparty]~~positions as of the reporting dates indicated:

(In thousands) Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet Netting Adjustments Cash Collateral Posted Net Exposure
September 30, 2016 Derivative Assets $ 4,031
$ —
$ —
$ 4,031
June 30, 2016 Derivative Assets $ 6,586
$ —
$ —
$ 6,586

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~



(In thousands)		Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet		Netting Adjustments			Cash Collateral Posted		Net Exposure
March 31, 2017	Derivative Assets	$	523	$	(523	)	$	—	$	—
	Derivative Liabilities	$	862	$	(523	)	$	—	$	339
June 30, 2016	Derivative Assets	$	6,586	$	—		$	—	$	6,586

Cash Flow Hedges

Changes in the fair value of the Company's coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent effective, are deferred in AOCI and reclassified into cost of goods sold in the same period or periods in which the hedged forecasted purchases affect earnings, or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Based on recorded values at ~~September 30, 2016, $5.3~~March 31, 2017, $1.9 million of net gains on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are expected to be reclassified into cost of goods sold within the next twelve months. These recorded values are based on market prices of the commodities as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Due to the volatile nature of commodity prices, actual gains or losses realized within the next twelve months will likely differ from these values.

Note 8.9. Investments

The following table shows gains and losses on trading securities held for investment by the Company:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,					Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2017		2016			2017			2016
Total gains (losses) recognized from trading securities held for investment	$	227		$	(147	)	$	738	$	2		$	(354	)	$	120
Less: Realized losses from sales of trading securities held for investment	(2		)	(1		)
Less: Realized gains (losses) from sales of trading securities held for investment							7		17			5			(10		)
Unrealized gains (losses) from trading securities held for investment	$	229		$	(146	)	$	731	$	(15	)	$	(359	)	$	130

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 9.10. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:


(In thousands)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
September 30, 2016
March 31, 2017
Preferred stock(1)	$	26,017	$	23,114	$	2,903	$	—	$	26,541	$	23,606	$	2,935	$	—
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)	$	3,908	$	—	$	3,908	$	—	$	522	$	—	$	522	$	—
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2)									$	326	$	—	$	326	$	—
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)	$	123	$	—	$	123	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	1	$	—
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(2)									$	536	$	—	$	536	$	—

	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2016
Preferred stock(1)	$	25,591	$	21,976	$	3,615	$	—	$	25,591	$	21,976	$	3,615	$	—
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)	$	6,346	$	—	$	6,346	$	—	$	6,346	$	—	$	6,346	$	—
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(2)	$	240	$	—	$	240	$	—	$	240	$	—	$	240	$	—

____________________


(1)	Included in “Short-term investments” on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(2)	The Company's ~~coffee~~coffee-related derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2.

During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, there were no transfers of preferred stock from Level 1 to Level 2.

Note 11. Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net



	March 31, 2017			June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Trade receivables	$	47,891		$	43,113
Other receivables(1)	3,190			1,965
Allowance for doubtful accounts	(655		)	(714		)
Accounts and notes receivable, net	$	50,426		$	44,364

__________

(1) At March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, the Company had recorded $0.3 million and $0.5 million, in "Other receivables" included in "Accounts and notes receivable, net" on its condensed consolidated balance sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note ~~10. Accounts and Notes Receivable, Net~~

September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Trade receivables $ 43,738
$ 43,113
Other receivables(1) 4,396
1,965
Allowance for doubtful accounts (1,220 ) (714 )
Accounts and notes receivable, net $ 46,914
$ 44,364

~~__________~~

(1) At September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, respectively, the Company had recorded $0.7 million and $0.5 million, in "Other receivables" included in "Accounts and notes receivable, net" on its consolidated balance sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris.

~~Note 11.~~12. Inventories


(In thousands)	September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016
Coffee
Processed	$	11,739	$	12,362	$	11,125	$	12,362
Unprocessed	20,409		13,534		24,290		13,534
Total	$	32,148	$	25,896	$	35,415	$	25,896
Tea and culinary products
Processed	$	14,493	$	15,384	$	21,011	$	15,384
Unprocessed	52		377		77		377
Total	$	14,545	$	15,761	$	21,088	$	15,761
Coffee brewing equipment parts	$	4,409	$	4,721	$	4,209	$	4,721
Total inventories	$	51,102	$	46,378	$	60,712	$	46,378

In addition to product cost, inventory costs include expenditures such as direct labor and certain supply and overhead expenses incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. The “Unprocessed” inventory values as stated in the above table represent the value of raw materials and the “Processed” inventory values represent all other products consisting primarily of finished goods.

Because the ~~Company anticipates that its~~expected reduction in spice inventory levels at June 30, 2017 ~~will decrease~~ from June 30, 2016 levels ~~primarily from~~is expected to generate a ~~reduction in spice products inventories,~~beneficial effect, the Company recorded $0.8 million and $2.5 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, respectively, which increased ~~net~~ income before taxes for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 by $0.8 ~~million. No such~~million and $2.5 million, respectively. The Company recorded $0.8 million and $1.1 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities ~~was recorded~~in cost of goods sold in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016, respectively, which increased income before taxes for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 by $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be based on management's estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates are subject to many forces beyond management's control, interim results are subject to the final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory valuation.

Note 13. Property, Plant and Equipment



(In thousands)	March 31, 2017			June 30, 2016
Buildings and facilities	$	54,364		$	54,768
Machinery and equipment	177,916			177,784
Buildings and facilities—New Facility	52,491			28,110
Machinery and equipment—New Facility	19,646			4,443
Office furniture and equipment—New Facility	3,990			—
Equipment under capital leases	7,552			11,982
Capitalized software	21,218			21,545
Office furniture and equipment	8,220			16,077
	345,397			314,709
Accumulated depreciation	(189,756		)	(206,162		)
Land	16,336			9,869
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	171,977		$	118,416

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note ~~12.~~14. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company provides benefit plans for most full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally, the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a combination of years of service and earnings. In addition, the Company contributes to two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

retiree, dental and vision coverage. The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit to certain of its employees and retirees.

The Company is required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company is also required to recognize in other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ (“OCI”) certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.

Single Employer Pension Plans

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for Company employees hired prior to January 1, 2010, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The Company amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June 30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants.

The Company also has two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan” and the “Hourly Employees' Plan”). ~~See~~ ~~Note 19~~Effective October 1, 2016, the Company froze benefit accruals and participation in the Hourly Employees' Plan, a defined benefit pension plan for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. After the freeze the participants in the plan are eligible to receive the Company's matching contributions to their 401(k).

The net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit pension plans is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
(In thousands)
Service cost	$	124		$	97		$	124		$	97		$	372		$	291
Interest cost	1,397			1,546			1,397			1,546			4,191			4,638
Expected return on plan assets	(1,607		)	(1,710		)	(1,607		)	(1,710		)	(4,821		)	(5,130		)
Amortization of net loss(1)	508			370			508			370			1,524			1,110
Net periodic benefit cost	$	422		$	303		$	422		$	303		$	1,266		$	909

___________

(1) These amounts represent the estimated portion of the net loss ~~remaining~~ in AOCI that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the current fiscal year.

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost



	Fiscal
	2017	2016
Discount rate	3.55%	4.40%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	7.75%	7.50%

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Basis Used to Determine Expected Long-Term Return on Plan Assets

The expected long-term return on plan assets assumption was developed as a weighted average rate based on the target asset allocation of the plan and the Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (CMA) 2014. The capital market assumptions were developed with a primary focus on forward-looking valuation models and market indicators. The key fundamental economic inputs for these models are future inflation, economic growth, and interest rate environment. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the investment horizon for the CMA 2014 is 20 to 30 years. In addition to forward-looking models, historical analysis of market data and trends was reflected, as well as the outlook of recognized economists, organizations and consensus CMA from other credible studies.

Multiemployer Pension Plans

The Company participates in two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans that are union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (“WCTPP”) is individually significant. The Company makes contributions to these plans generally based on the number of hours worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if the Company stops participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability.

In fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) and recorded a charge of $4.3 million associated with withdrawal from this plan, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of $0.1 million over 80 quarters. On November 18, 2014, the Pension Fund sent the Company a notice of assessment of withdrawal liability in the amount of $4.4 million, which the Pension Fund adjusted to $4.9 million on January 5, 2015. The Company is in the process of negotiating a reduced liability amount. The Company has commenced quarterly installment payments to the Pension Fund of $91,000 pending the final settlement of the liability. The ~~total~~remaining estimated withdrawal liability of ~~$3.7~~$3.6 million and $3.8 million ~~respectively,~~ is reflected in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, with the short-term and long-term portions reflected in current and long-term liabilities, respectively.

The Company may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan. Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, if successful, the Company may incur a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to the Company's results of operations and cash flows.

Multiemployer Plans Other Than Pension Plans

The Company participates in ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. The plans are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and provide that participating employers make monthly contributions to the plans in an amount as specified in the collective bargaining agreements. Also, the plans provide that participants make self-payments to the plans, the amounts of which are negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The Company's participation in these plans is governed by collective bargaining agreements which expire on or before January 31, 2020.

401(k) Plan

The Company's 401(k) Plan is available to all eligible employees who have worked more than 1,000 hours during a calendar year and were employed at the end of the calendar year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may choose to contribute a percentage of their annual pay subject to the maximum contribution allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company's matching contribution is discretionary, based on approval by the Company's Board of Directors. For the calendar years ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, the Company's Board of Directors approved a Company matching contribution of 50% of an employee's annual contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to 6% of the employee's eligible income. The matching contributions (and any earnings thereon) vest at the rate of 20% for each of the participant's first 5 years of vesting service, so that a participant is fully vested in his or her matching contribution account after 5 years of vesting service, subject to accelerated vesting under certain

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

circumstances in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan due to the closure of the Company’s Torrance Facility or a reduction-in-force at another Company facility designated by the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans. A participant is automatically vested in the event of death, disability or attainment of age 65 while employed by the Company. Employees are 100% vested in their contributions. For employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the match is only available if so provided in the labor agreement.

The Company recorded matching contributions of ~~$0.5 million and~~ $0.4 million in operating expenses ~~for~~in each of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, and ~~2015, respectively.~~$1.2 million in operating expenses in each of the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Postretirement Benefits

The Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees (“Retiree Medical Plan”). The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, the Company’s contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service,

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution.

The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit (“Death Benefit”) to certain of its employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. The Company records the actuarially determined liability for the present value of the postretirement death benefit. The Company has purchased life insurance policies to fund the postretirement death benefit wherein the Company owns the policy but the postretirement death benefit is paid to the employee's or retiree's beneficiary. The Company records an asset for the fair value of the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies.

Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit

The following table shows the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was based on employee census information and asset information as of July 1, 2016.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
(In thousands)
Service cost	$	190		$	347		$	190		$	347		$	570		$	1,041
Interest cost	207			299			207			299			621			897
Amortization of net gain	(157		)	(49		)	(157		)	(49		)	(471		)	(147		)
Amortization of net prior service credit	(439		)	(439		)	(439		)	(439		)	(1,317		)	(1,317		)
Net periodic postretirement benefit (credit) cost	$	(199	)	$	158		$	(199	)	$	158		$	(597	)	$	474

Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost



	Fiscal
	2017	2016
Retiree Medical Plan discount rate	3.73%	4.69%
Death Benefit discount rate	3.79%	4.74%

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note ~~13.~~15. Bank Loan

The Company maintains a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with a sublimit on letters of credit and swingline loans of $30.0 million and $15.0 ~~million.~~million, respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby the Company may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on the Company’s eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory, and the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee ranges from 0.25% to 0.375% per annum based on average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of the Company’s assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and the Company's preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. The Company is subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the right of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to the Company. The Company is allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility expires on March 2, 2020.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company was eligible to borrow up to a total of ~~$57.5~~$61.7 million under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of ~~$0.2~~$44.2 million, utilized ~~$11.9~~$4.4 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of ~~$45.4~~$13.1 million. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on the Company's outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was ~~1.66%~~2.52% and the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.

Note ~~14.~~16. Share-based Compensation

Non-qualified stock options with time-based vesting (“NQOs”)

In the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company granted no shares issuable upon the exercise of NQOs.

The following table summarizes NQO activity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016:~~March 31, 2017:


Outstanding NQOs:	Number of NQOs		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)	Number of NQOs		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2016	219,629		13.87	6.28	3.7	3,995	219,629		13.87	6.28	3.7	3,995
Granted	—		—	—	—	—	—		—	—	—	—
Exercised	(12,000	)	6.96	3.44	—	318	(58,324	)	10.72	4.88	—	1,306
Cancelled/Forfeited	(3,278	)	14.60	6.02	—	—	(18,156	)	25.12	10.89	—	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2016	204,351		14.26	6.45	3.5	4,350
Vested and exercisable, September 30, 2016	166,147		11.33	5.25	3.0	4,025
Vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2016	202,333		14.13	6.39	3.5	4,333
Outstanding at March 31, 2017							143,149		13.72	6.26	2.7	3,096
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2017							129,866		12.40	5.75	2.4	2,981
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2017							142,626		13.67	6.24	2.7	3,092

The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$35.55~~$35.35 at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016, representing the last trading day of the fiscal periods, which would have been received by NQO holders had all award holders exercised their NQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of NQO exercises in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, 10,570 NQO shares vested and 58,324 NQO shares were exercised. Total fair value of NQOs vested during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~$6,000. No NQOs vested during the three months ended September 30, 2015.~~$0.1 million. The Company received ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million and ~~$0.3~~$1.3 million in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively.

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, respectively, there was ~~$0.3~~$0.1 million and $0.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of ~~1.9~~1.5 years. Total compensation expense for NQOs ~~was $42,000 and $34,000~~ in the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $14,000 and ~~2015,~~$45,000, respectively. Total compensation expense for NQOs in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting (“PNQs”)

In the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company granted no149,223 shares issuable upon the exercise of ~~PNQs.~~

PNQs to eligible employees under the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), with 20% of each such grant subject to forfeiture if a target modified net income goal for fiscal 2017 is not attained. For this purpose, “Modified Net Income” is defined as net income (GAAP) before taxes and excluding any gains or losses from sales of assets, and excluding the effect of restructuring and other transition expenses related to the relocation of the Company’s corporate headquarters to Northlake, Texas. These PNQs have an exercise price of $32.85, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on Nasdaq on the date of grant. One-third of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on continued employment, and subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances.

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~Following are the weighted average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for PNQs granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2017.



	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2017
Weighted average fair value of PNQs	$11.42
Risk-free interest rate	1.53%
Dividend yield	—%
Average expected term	4.9 years
Expected stock price volatility	37.7%

The following table summarizes PNQ activity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016:~~March 31, 2017:


Outstanding PNQs:	Number of PNQs	Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)	Number of PNQs		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2016	288,599	25.83	10.82	5.7	1,798	288,599		25.83	10.82	5.7	1,798
Granted	—	—	—	—	—	149,223		32.85	11.42	4.8	—
Exercised	—	—	—	—	—	(8,132	)	24.35	10.67	—	73
Cancelled/Forfeited	—	—	—	—	—	(62,262	)	31.43	11.38	—	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2016	288,599	25.83	10.82	5.5	2,805
Vested and exercisable, September 30, 2016	48,132	22.52	10.31	4.9	627
Vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2016	277,923	25.76	10.81	5.5	2,722
Outstanding at March 31, 2017						367,428		27.77	10.97	5.3	2,787
Vested and exercisable at March 31, 2017						149,777		24.01	10.62	4.3	1,698
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2017						353,920		27.64	10.96	5.3	2,729

The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$35.55~~$35.35 at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016 representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods, which would have been received by PNQ holders had all award holders exercised their PNQs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of PNQ exercises in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. PNQs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, 109,777 PNQ shares vested and 8,132 PNQ shares were exercised. Total fair value of PNQs vested ~~or were exercised~~ during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 was $1.2 million. The Company received $0.2 million and $0.3 million in proceeds from exercises of vested PNQs in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015.~~respectively.

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company met the performance target for the ~~first year~~second and final tranche of the fiscal 2014 awards and the first tranche of the fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 awards and expects that it will achieve the performance targets set forth in the PNQ agreements for the remainder of the fiscal ~~2014~~2015 and ~~fiscal 2015~~2016 awards, and the fiscal ~~2016~~2017 awards.

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, there was ~~$1.7~~$2.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of ~~1.3~~1.5 years. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in each of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ was $0.2 million. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.8 million and ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock

~~The~~During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, the Company granted no5,106 shares orof restricted stock to non-employee directors under the LTIP with a grant date fair value of $35.25 per share. Unlike prior-year awards to non-employee directors, which vest ratably over a period of three years, the fiscal 2017 restricted stock awards cliff vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued service to the Company through the vesting date and the acceleration provisions of the LTIP and restricted stock agreement. No shares of restricted stock were granted to employees during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, 7,458 shares of restricted stock vested.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016:~~March 31, 2017:


Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards:	Shares Awarded	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)	Shares Awarded		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2016	23,792	26.00	1.8	763	23,792		26.00	1.8	763
Granted	—	—	—	—	5,106		35.25	0.7	180
Exercised/Released	—	—	—	—	(7,458	)	24.16	—	253
Cancelled/Forfeited	—	—	—	—	(5,995	)	—	—	—
Outstanding at September 30, 2016	23,792	26.00	1.6	846
Expected to vest, September 30, 2016	22,485	25.92	1.6	799
Outstanding at March 31, 2017					15,445		29.79	1.1	546
Expected to vest at March 31, 2017					14,843		29.78	1.1	525

The aggregate intrinsic value of shares outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$35.55~~$35.35 at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and $32.06 at June 30, 2016, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods. Restricted stock that is expected to vest is net of estimated forfeitures.

~~Farmer Bros. Co.~~

~~Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, there was ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock. The unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of ~~1.8~~1.1 years. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was ~~$60,000~~$15,000 and ~~$45,000~~$66,000 for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.2 million and ~~2015, respectively.~~$0.1 million, respectively, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note ~~15.~~17. Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities include the following:


	September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
New Facility lease obligation(1)	$	—	$	28,110	$	—	$	28,110
Earnout payable—RLC acquisition(2)	100		100		—		100
Earnout payable—West Coast Coffee acquisition(3)					600		—
Other long-term liabilities	$	100	$	28,210	$	600	$	28,210

___________

(1) Lease obligation associated with construction of the New Facility. The lease obligation was reversed upon termination of the Lease Agreement concurrent with the closing of the purchase option on September 15, 2016 (see Note 45).

(2) Earnout payable in connection with the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Rae' Launo Corporation completed on January 12, 2015.

(3) Earnout payable in connection with the Company's acquisition of substantially all of the assets of West Coast Coffee on February 7, 2017.

Note ~~16.~~18. Income Taxes

The Company’ effective tax rates for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 were 44.4% and ~~September 30, 2015~~3.5%, respectively. The Company’ effective tax rates for the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were ~~39.9%~~40.4% and ~~7.6%~~5.3%, respectively. The effective tax ~~rate~~rates for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016 is~~March 31, 2017 are higher than the ~~U.S.statutory~~U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to state income tax expense. The effective tax ~~rate~~rates for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015 is~~March 31, 2016 are lower than the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% primarily due to a valuation allowance recorded against the ~~income~~Company's deferred tax ~~benefit for net operating losses generated during the period.~~assets.

The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company considered whether a valuation allowance should be recorded against deferred tax assets based on the likelihood that the benefits of the deferred tax assets would or would not ultimately be realized in future periods. In making such assessment, significant weight was given to evidence that could be objectively verified such as recent operating results and less consideration was given to less objective indicators such as future income projections. After consideration of positive and negative evidence, including the recent history of income, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not that the Company will generate future income sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016. Accordingly, the Company recorded a reduction in its valuation allowance in fiscal 2016 in the amount of $83.2 million.

As of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016 the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of the Company’s tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014 and accepted the returns as filed for each of those years.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note ~~17.~~19. Net Income ~~(Loss)~~ Per Common Share


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended March 31,				Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)	2016		2015			2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders—basic	$	1,615	$	(1,071	)
Net income (loss) attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders	3		(3		)
Net income (loss)	$	1,618	$	(1,074	)
Net income attributable to common stockholders—basic						$	1,592	$	1,190	$	23,253	$	5,673
Net income attributable to nonvested restricted stockholders						2		2		35		6
Net income						$	1,594	$	1,192	$	23,288	$	5,679

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic	16,562,984		16,269,368			16,605,754		16,539,479		16,584,125		16,486,469
Effect of dilutive securities:
Shares issuable under stock options	121,335		—			116,020		107,936		120,075		127,806
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted	16,684,319		16,269,368			16,721,774		16,647,415		16,704,200		16,614,275
Net income (loss) per common share—basic	$	0.10	$	(0.07	)
Net income (loss) per common share—diluted	$	0.10	$	(0.07	)
Net income per common share—basic						$	0.10	$	0.07	$	1.40	$	0.34
Net income per common share—diluted						$	0.10	$	0.07	$	1.39	$	0.34

Note ~~18.~~20. Commitments and Contingencies:

For a detailed discussion about the Company's commitments and contingencies, see Note 22, "Commitments and Contingencies" to the consolidated financial statements in the 2016 Form 10-K. During the nine months ended March 31, 2017, other than the following, there were no material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies.

~~Contractual obligations for future fiscal periods are as follows:~~

Contractual Obligations
(In thousands)
Capital Lease
Obligations

Operating
Lease
Obligations
New Facility Construction Contract (1)
Pension Plan
Obligations

Postretirement
Benefits Other
Than Pension Plans
Revolving Credit Facility Purchase Commitments (2)
Nine months ending June 30,
2017
$ 988
$ 3,052
$ 14,435
$ 6,056
$ 810
$ 200
$ 78,385
Year Ending June 30,
2018 $ 881
$ 3,620
$ —
$ 8,304
$ 1,102
$ —
$ 496
2019 $ 126
$ 2,817
$ —
$ 8,554
$ 1,143
$ —
$ —
2020 $ 51
$ 1,360
$ —
$ 8,844
$ 1,176
$ —
$ —
2021 $ 4
$ 441
$ —
$ 9,074
$ 1,210
$ —
$ —
Thereafter $ —
$ 61
$ —
$ 47,099
$ 6,246
$ —
$ —
$ 11,351
$ 14,435
$ 87,931
$ 11,687
$ 200
$ 78,881
Total minimum lease payments $ 2,050

Less: imputed interest
(0.82% to 10.7%)
$ (90 )
Present value of future minimum lease payments $ 1,960

Less: current portion $ 1,261

Long-term capital lease obligations $ 699

~~___________~~Leases

~~(1)~~As part of the China Mist transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing 17,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. As part of the West Coast Coffee transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing 20,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of 24,150 square feet in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. See Note 43.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Contractual obligations for future fiscal periods are as follows:



	Contractual Obligations
(In thousands)	Capital Lease Obligations			Operating Lease Obligations		New Facility Construction and Equipment Contracts (1)		Pension Plan Obligations		Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pension Plans		Revolving Credit Facility		Purchase Commitments (2)
Three months ending June 30, 2017	$	341		$	1,233	$	11,698	$	1,973	$	270	$	44,175	$	41,919
Year Ending June 30,
2018	$	990		$	4,684	$	—	$	8,304	$	1,102	$	—	$	37,584
2019	$	186		$	3,798	$	—	$	8,554	$	1,143	$	—	$	—
2020	$	51		$	2,133	$	—	$	8,844	$	1,176	$	—	$	—
2021	$	4		$	798	$	—	$	9,074	$	1,210	$	—	$	—
Thereafter	$	—		$	186	$	—	$	47,262	$	6,246	$	—	$	—
				$	12,832	$	11,698	$	84,011	$	11,147	$	44,175	$	79,503
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,572
Less: imputed interest (0.82% to 10.7%)	$	(52	)
Present value of future minimum lease payments	$	1,520
Less: current portion	$	1,131
Long-term capital lease obligations	$	389

___________

(1) Includes $5.5 million in outstanding contractual obligations for construction of the New Facility and $6.2 million in outstanding contractual obligations under the Amended Building Contract as of March 31, 2017. See Note 5.

(2) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company considers to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not include amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Self-Insurance

At June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a $7.4 million letter of credit as a security deposit with the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Self-Insurance Plans for participation in the alternative security program for California self-insurers for workers’ compensation liability in California. The State of California notified the Company on December 13, 2016 that it had released and authorized the cancellation of the letter of credit. At March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, the Company had posted a $4.4 million and $4.3 million letter of credit, respectively, as a security deposit for self-insuring workers’ compensation, general liability and auto insurance coverages outside of California.

Non-cancelable Purchase Orders

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling ~~$65.0~~$68.9 million under fixed-price contracts, equipment for the New Facility totaling ~~$1.2~~$0.5 million and other ~~inventory~~purchases totaling ~~$12.7~~$10.1 million under non-cancelable purchase orders.

Farmer Bros. Co.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Legal Proceedings

Steve Hernandez vs. Farmer Bros. Co., Superior Court of State of California, County of Los Angeles

On July 24, 2015, former Company employee Hernandez filed a putative class action complaint for damages alleging a single cause of action for unfair competition under the California Business & Professions Code. The claim purports to seek disgorgement of profits for alleged violations of various provisions of the California Labor Code relating to: failing to pay overtime, failing to provide meal breaks, failing to pay minimum wage, failing to pay wages timely during employment and upon termination, failing to provide accurate and complete wage statements, and failing to reimburse business-related expenses. Hernandez’s complaint seeks restitution in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief, in addition to attorneys’ fees and expenses. Hernandez alleges that the putative class is all “current and former hourly-paid or non-exempt individuals” for the four (4) years preceding the filing of the complaint through final judgment, and Hernandez also purports to reserve the right to establish sub-classes as appropriate. On November 12, 2015, a separate putative class representative, Monica Zuno, filed claim under the same class action; the Court has related this case to the Hernandez case. On November 17, 2015, the unified case was assigned to a judge, and this judge ordered the stay on discovery to remain intact until after a decision on the Company’s demurrer action. The plaintiff filed an Opposition to the Demurrer and, in response, on January 5, 2016, the Company filed a reply to this Opposition to the Demurrer. On February 2, 2016, the Court held a hearing on the demurrer and found in the Company’s favor, sustaining the demurrer in its entirety without leave to amend as to the plaintiff Hernandez, and so dismissing Hernandez’s claims and the related putative class. Claims on behalf of the plaintiff Zuno remain at this time. The Company provided responses to discovery following a lift by the Court of the stay on discovery. Responses to plaintiff’s first set of written and document discovery were filed on October 31, 2016. Following an October 31, 2016 hearing on a motion to compel and for sanctions against plaintiff and counsel for failing to appear for deposition, the Court granted the Company’s motion, ruling that all of plaintiff’s objections to the deposition notice were waived and ordered payment to the Company of $2,828 in sanctions. Depositions and written discovery proceeded from December 2016 through the first calendar quarter of 2017. A case management conference occurred on January 26, 2017, and a further case management conference has been scheduled for June 7, 2017 to determine whether Zuno intends to move forward as a purported class action or on an individual basis only. At this time, the Company is not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to this matter.

~~Note 19. Subsequent Events~~

~~Completion of Asset Acquisition~~

On October 11, 2016, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas, for an aggregate purchase price of $11.3 million, with $10.8 million paid in cash at closing and $0.5 million to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are reached in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018.

~~Hourly Employees' Plan Freeze~~

Effective October 1, 2016, the Company froze benefit accruals and participation in the Hourly Employees' Plan, a defined benefit pension plan for certain hourly employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. After the freeze the participants in the plan are eligible to receive the Company's matching contributions to their 401(k).

~~Extension of Torrance Facility Lease~~

Subsequent to the quarter ended September 30, 2016, pursuant to the sale-leaseback agreement with the buyer of the Torrance Facility, the Company exercised its option to extend the Torrance Facility lease through December 31, 2016, at a base rent of $100,000 per month.



Item 7.2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Certain statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not based on historical fact and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws and regulations. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and observations of future events and include any statements that do not directly relate to any historical or current fact; actual results may differ materially due in part to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on September 14, 2016 ~~(the "2016 10-K")~~ and Part II, Item 1A of this report. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words like “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “intends,” “will,” “could,” “assumes” and other words of similar meaning. Owing to the uncertainties inherent in forward-looking statements, actual results could differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only at the time of this report and do not undertake to update or revise these statements as more information becomes available except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the timing and success of ~~implementation of the Company’s Corporate Relocation Plan,~~ completion of construction of the New Facility, ~~and~~ the availability of capital resources to fund the construction costs and capital expenditures for the New Facility, the ~~diversion~~timing and success of ~~management time on~~implementation of the ~~Corporate Relocation~~DSD Restructuring Plan, ~~and other transaction-related issues,~~ the timing and success of the Company in realizing estimated savings from ~~third party~~third-party logistics ("3PL") and vendor managed inventory, the realization of the Company’s cost savings estimates, the timing and success of the Company realizing the benefits of its acquisitions, the relative effectiveness of compensation-based employee incentives in causing improvements in Company performance, the capacity to meet the demands of our large national account customers, the extent of execution of plans for the growth of Company business and achievement of financial metrics related to those plans, the ~~success of the Company to retain and/or attract qualified employees, the~~ effect of the capital markets as well as other external factors on stockholder value, fluctuations in availability and cost of green coffee, competition, organizational changes, our ability to retain employees with specialized knowledge, the effectiveness of our hedging strategies in reducing price risk, changes in consumer preferences, our ability to provide sustainability in ways that do not materially impair profitability, changes in the strength of the economy, business conditions in the coffee industry and food industry in general, our continued success in

attracting new customers, variances from budgeted sales mix and growth rates, weather and special or unusual events, changes in the quality or dividend stream of third parties’ securities and other investment vehicles in which we have invested our assets, as well as other risks described in this report and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the SEC. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period.

Overview

We are a national coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinary products manufactured under supply agreements, under our owned brands, as well as under private labels on behalf of certain customers. We were founded in 1912, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. We operate in one business segment.

We serve a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurants and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, hospitals, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand coffee and ~~consumer-branded~~consumer-facing branded coffee and tea products. Through our sustainability, stewardship, environmental efforts, and leadership we are not only committed to serving the finest products available, considering the cost needs of the customer, but also insist on their sustainable cultivation, manufacture and distribution whenever possible. Our product categories consist of a robust line of roast and ground coffee, including organic, Direct Trade, Direct Trade Verified Sustainable ("DTVS") and sustainably-produced offerings; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas; culinary products including gelatins and puddings, soup bases, dressings, gravy and sauce mixes, pancake and biscuit mixes, jellies and preserves, and coffee-related products such as coffee filters, sugar and creamers; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and ready-to-drink iced coffee. We offer a comprehensive approach to our customers by providing not only a breadth of high-quality products, but also value-added services such as market insight, beverage planning, and equipment placement and service.

We operate production facilities in Northlake, Texas (the "New Facility"); Houston, Texas; Portland, ~~Oregon~~Oregon; Hillsboro, Oregon; and ~~Houston, Texas.~~Scottsdale, Arizona. Distribution takes place out of ~~our~~the New Facility, the Portland, ~~facility~~Hillsboro and Scottsdale facilities, as well as ~~three~~ separate distribution centers in Northlake, Illinois; ~~Oklahoma City, Oklahoma;~~ and Moonachie, New Jersey. On July 15, 2016 we completed the sale of certain property, including our former headquarters in Torrance,

California (the “Torrance Facility”) and leased it back. ~~As of September 30, 2016,~~We vacated the Torrance Facility ~~continued to house certain administrative functions and serve as a distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition of the~~after transitioning our remaining Torrance operations to our other ~~facilities. Upon completion,~~facilities and concluded the leaseback arrangement as of December 31, 2016. We commenced distribution activities at the New Facility ~~will serve as a~~during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production ~~facility and distribution center for our products.~~activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.

Our products reach our customers primarily in two ways: through our nationwide DSD network of ~~450~~646 delivery routes and ~~107~~114 branch warehouses ~~at September 30, 2016,~~as of March 31, 2017, or direct-shipped via common carriers or third-party distributors. We operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver our products, and we rely on 3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution. DSD sales are made “off-truck” to our customers at their places of business.

Corporate Relocation

In an effort to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities, in fiscal 2015 we began the process of relocating our corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to ~~a new facility (the "New Facility")~~the New Facility housing these operations ~~currently under construction~~ in Northlake, Texas (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance Facility closure.

The significant milestones associated with our Corporate Relocation Plan are as follows:



Event		Date
Announced Corporate Relocation Plan		Q3 fiscal 2015
Transitioned coffee processing and packaging from Torrance production facility and consolidated them with Houston and Portland production facilities		Q4 fiscal 2015
Moved Houston distribution operations to Oklahoma City distribution center		Q4 fiscal 2015
Entered into the lease agreement and development management agreement for New Facility		Q1 fiscal 2016
Commenced construction of New Facility		Q1 fiscal 2016
Transitioned primary administrative offices from Torrance to temporary leased offices in Fort Worth, Texas		Q1-Q2 fiscal 2016
Sold Spice Assets to Harris		Q2 fiscal 2016
Principal design work completed on New Facility		Q3 fiscal 2016
Completed transition services to Harris and ceased spice processing and packaging at Torrance Facility		Q4 fiscal 2016
Entered into purchase and sale agreement to sell Torrance Facility		Q4 fiscal 2016
Exercised purchase option on New Facility		Q4 fiscal 2016
Closed sale of Torrance Facility		Q1 fiscal 2017
Closed purchase option for New Facility		Q1 fiscal 2017
Entered into amended building contract with The Haskell Company		Q1 fiscal 2017
~~Exit~~Exited from Torrance Facility		~~Estimated~~ Q2 fiscal 2017
~~Completion~~Substantial completion of construction and relocation to New Facility		~~Estimated~~ Q3 fiscal 2017
Transitioned Oklahoma City distribution operations to New Facility		Q3 fiscal 2017

See Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition below for further details of the impact of these activities on our financial condition and liquidity.

Recent Developments

On ~~July 15, 2016,~~February 21, 2017, we ~~completed~~announced a restructuring plan to reorganize our DSD operations in an effort to realign functions into a channel based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results (the “DSD Restructuring Plan”). The strategic decision to undertake the ~~previously-announced sale~~DSD Restructuring Plan resulted from an ongoing operational review of various initiatives within the DSD selling organization. We expect to complete the DSD Restructuring Plan by the end of the ~~Torrance Facility~~second quarter of fiscal 2018.

We estimate that we will recognize approximately $3.7 to $4.9 million of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately ~~665,000 square feet~~$1.9 million to $2.7 million in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and $1.8 million to $2.2 million in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. We may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds fromor associated with, the ~~sale of Torrance Facility were $42.5 million.~~DSD Restructuring Plan. See Note 54, ~~Sales of Assets—Sale of Torrance Facility, and~~ ~~Note 6~~, ~~Assets Held for Sale~~Restructuring Plans—DSD Restructuring Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

On ~~September 9, 2016,~~February 7, 2017, we ~~entered into an asset purchase agreement to acquire~~acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. (“West Coast Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.7 million, which included $14.7 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. The acquisition of West Coast Coffee is expected to broaden our reach in the Northwestern United States. See Note 3, Acquisitions—West Coast Coffee

Company, Inc., of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

On October 11, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored iced teas and iced green teas, for an aggregate purchase ~~price~~consideration of ~~$11.3~~$11.7 million, ~~with $10.8~~which included $11.2 million ~~to be paid~~ in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $0.4 million and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 ~~and~~or 2018. ~~The transaction closed on October 11, 2016.~~ We anticipate that the acquisition of China Mist will extend our tea product offerings and give us a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry. See Note 193, ~~Subsequent Events—Completion of Asset Acquisition,~~Acquisitions-China Mist Brands, Inc., of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

On September 17, 2016, we and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between us and Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the "Amended Building Contract"). Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, we will pay Builder up to $21.9 million for Builder’s services in connection with the pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility. See Note 5, New Facility, and Note 20, Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

On September 15, 2016 (the "Purchase Option Closing Date"), we closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred for the partially constructed New Facility as of the Purchase Option Closing Date, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. The Purchase Price was paid in cash from proceeds received from the sale of the Torrance Facility. See Note 45, New Facility, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

On ~~September 17,~~July 15, 2016, we completed the sale of the Torrance Facility consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.33 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and ~~The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into~~documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million. Following the closing of the sale, we leased back the Torrance Facility on a ~~Change Order, which, among other things, amended~~triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, and exercised two one-month extensions at a base rent of $100,000 per month. We vacated the ~~building contract~~Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. Accordingly, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, we recognized a net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility in the amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.7 million and non-cash rent expense of $1.4 million, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously ~~entered into between us~~recorded in “Other current liabilities” and ~~Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price~~removed the amounts recorded in “Assets Held for Sale” and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the "Amended Building Contract"). Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, we will pay Builder up to $21.4 million for Builder’s services in connection with the pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility.“Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on our consolidated balance sheet. See Note 46, ~~New~~Sales of Assets—Sale of Torrance Facility, and Note 187, ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~Assets Held for Sale, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this ~~report).~~report.

Results of Operations

Financial Highlights

Volume of green coffee pounds processed and sold increased 6.9% in each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Gross profit increased ~~1.2%~~2.4% to ~~$51.2~~$53.8 million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 from ~~$50.6~~$52.6 million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Gross profit increased 2.6% to $160.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 from $156.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Gross margin ~~increased~~decreased to ~~39.2%~~38.9% in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017, from ~~37.9%~~39.1% in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Gross margin increased to 39.3% in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, from 38.0% in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Income from operations was ~~$2.5~~$2.1 million and $40.5 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 as compared to ~~a loss from operations of $(0.6)~~$0.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively, in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Income from operations included a $37.4 million net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and net gains of $5.4 million from the sale of Spice Assets in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Net income was $1.6 million, or $0.10 per diluted common share, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, compared to ~~a net loss of $(1.1)~~$1.2 million, or ~~$(0.07)~~$0.07 per diluted common share, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Net income was $23.3 million, or $1.39 per diluted common share, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $5.7 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share, in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

EBITDA increased 52.7% to $10.0 million and EBITDA Margin was 7.3% in the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to EBITDA of $6.6 million and EBITDA Margin of 4.9% in the three months ended March 31, 2016. EBITDA increased 159.5% to $57.2 million and EBITDA Margin was 14.0% in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to EBITDA of $22.1 million and EBITDA Margin of 5.4% in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Adjusted EBITDA increased 24.0% to $12.2 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 8.8% in the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $9.8 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 7.3% in the three months ended March 31, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased 5.7% to $34.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 8.4% in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $32.5 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 7.9% in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Net Sales

Net sales in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 decreased $3.0~~March 31, 2017 increased $3.7 million, or ~~2.2%~~2.8%, to ~~$130.5~~$138.2 million from ~~$133.4~~$134.5 million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 primarily due to a ~~$(2.3)~~$5.3 million increase in net sales of roast and ground coffee and a $1.5 million increase in net sales of tea products, primarily from the addition of China Mist, partially offset by a $(2.4) million decrease in net sales of spice products resulting from the sale of our institutional spice assets ~~partially offset by increases~~and a $(0.7) million decrease in net sales of ~~tea, culinary and other beverages.~~coffee (frozen liquid) products resulting from the loss of a large casino customer. Net sales in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 included ~~$(4.2)~~$1.2 million in price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to $(3.8) million in price decreases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Net sales in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 decreased $(2.5) million, or (0.6)%, to $407.7 million from $410.2 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2016. A $4.0 million increase in net sales from roast and ground coffee, a $3.0 million increase in net sales from tea products primarily from the addition of China Mist net sales from the date of its acquisition and a $1.2 million increase in net sales from culinary products were offset by a $(7.1) million decrease in net sales of spice products resulting from the sale of our institutional spice assets, a $(2.5) million decrease in net sales of coffee (frozen liquid) products and a $(0.7) million decrease in net sales of other beverages. Net sales in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 included $(5.4) million in price decreases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to ~~$1.3~~$(3.2) million in price ~~increases~~decreases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~

March 31, 2016.

The change in net sales in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year was due to the following:


(In millions)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 vs. 2015			Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 vs. 2016		Nine Months Ended March 31, 2017 vs. 2016
Effect of change in unit sales	$	1.7		$	0.8	$	9.5
Effect of pricing and product mix changes	(4.7		)	2.9		(12.0		)
Total decrease in net sales	$	(3.0	)
Total increase (decrease) in net sales				$	3.7	$	(2.5	)

Unit sales increased ~~7.4%~~0.6% in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal ~~2015, but~~year, and average unit price ~~decreased~~increased by ~~8.9%~~2.1% resulting in ~~a decrease~~an increase in net sales of ~~2.2%~~2.8%. ~~The increase in unit sales was primarily due to an 8.1% increase in~~In the three months ended

March 31, 2017, unit sales of roast and ground coffee products, which accounted for approximately ~~62%~~64% of total net sales, increased 6.9%, offset by a (80.6)% decrease in unit sales of spice products, which accounted for approximately 4% of net sales, due to the sale of our institutional spice assets, while the average unit price increased primarily due to the higher average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of higher green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In the three months ended March 31, 2017, we processed and sold approximately 24.4 million pounds of green coffee as compared to approximately 22.8 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the three months ended March 31, 2016. There were no new product category introductions in the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016 which had a material impact on our net sales.

Unit sales increased 2.4% in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, but average unit price decreased by (2.9)% resulting in a decrease in net sales of (0.6)%. In the nine months ended March 31, 2017, unit sales of our roast and ground coffee products which accounted for approximately 63% of our total net sales increased 6.9%, while the ~~decrease in~~ average unit price ~~was~~decreased primarily due to the lower average unit price of roast and ground coffee products primarily driven by the pass-through of lower green coffee commodity purchase costs to our customers. In the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we processed and sold approximately ~~23.3~~72.2 million pounds of green coffee as compared to ~~21.6~~approximately 67.6 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. There were no new product category introductions in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 or 2016 ~~or 2015~~ which had a material impact on our net sales.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present net sales aggregated by product category for the respective periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016				2015				2017				2016
(In thousands)	$		% of total		$		% of total		$		% of total		$		% of total
Net Sales by Product Category:
Coffee (Roast & Ground)	$	81,342	62	%	$	82,029	62	%	$	87,833	64	%	$	82,568	61	%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid)	7,911		6	%	8,679		6	%	8,228		6	%	8,907		7	%
Tea (Iced & Hot)	6,368		5	%	6,231		5	%	7,662		5	%	6,159		4	%
Culinary	13,810		11	%	13,277		10	%	13,855		10	%	13,220		10	%
Spice	6,389		5	%	8,702		6	%	5,948		4	%	8,381		6	%
Other beverages(1)	13,908		11	%	13,657		10	%	13,947		10	%	14,430		11	%
Net sales by product category	129,728		99	%	132,575		99	%	137,473		99	%	133,665		99	%
Fuel surcharge	760		1	%	870		1	%	714		1	%	803		1	%
Net sales	$	130,488	100	%	$	133,445	100	%	$	138,187	100	%	$	134,468	100	%

____________

(1) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.



	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2017				2016
(In thousands)	$		% of total		$		% of total
Net Sales by Product Category:
Coffee (Roast & Ground)	$	256,013	63	%	$	252,020	61	%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid)	24,623		6	%	27,145		7	%
Tea (Iced & Hot)	21,371		5	%	18,420		4	%
Culinary	41,354		10	%	40,198		10	%
Spice	18,303		4	%	25,428		6	%
Other beverages(1)	43,831		11	%	44,488		11	%
Net sales by product category	405,495		99	%	407,699		99	%
Fuel surcharge	2,205		1	%	2,521		1	%
Net sales	$	407,700	100	%	$	410,220	100	%

____________

(1) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 decreased $3.6~~March 31, 2017 increased $2.5 million, or ~~4.3%~~3.0%, to ~~$79.3~~$84.4 million, or ~~60.8%~~61.1% of net sales, from ~~$82.9~~$81.9 million, or ~~62.1%~~60.9% of net sales, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2017 increased due to startup costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility.

Cost of goods sold in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 decreased $(6.6) million, or (2.6)%, to $247.6 million, or 60.7% of net sales, from $254.2 million, or 62.0% of net sales, in the nine months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was primarily due to lower conversion costs from supply chain improvements and lower hedged cost of green coffee.

Because ~~we anticipate that our~~the expected reduction in spice inventory levels at June 30, 2017 ~~will decrease~~ from June 30, 2016 levels ~~primarily from~~is expected to generate a ~~reduction in spice product inventories,~~beneficial effect, we recorded $0.8 million and $2.5 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017, respectively, which increased ~~net~~ income before taxes in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 by $0.8 ~~million.~~million and $2.5 million, respectively. In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, we recorded no$0.8 million and $1.1 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory ~~liquidation~~quantities in cost of goods ~~sold.~~

sold which increased income before taxes for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 by $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively.

Gross Profit

Gross profit in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 increased ~~$0.6~~$1.2 million, or ~~1.2%~~2.4%, to ~~$51.2~~$53.8 million from ~~$50.6~~$52.6 million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and gross margin decreased to 38.9% in the three months ended March 31, 2017 from 39.1% in the three months ended March 31, 2016. Gross margin was impacted by the startup costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility, partially offset by favorable pricing. Gross profit in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 increased $4.1 million, or 2.6%, to $160.1 million from $156.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2016 and gross margin increased to ~~39.2%~~39.3% in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 from ~~37.9%~~38.0% in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015. The~~March 31, 2016. This increase in gross profit was primarily due to lower conversion costs and lower hedged cost of green coffee partially offset by the decrease in net ~~sales.~~sales and the startup costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility. Gross profit in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 included $0.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, in beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities. Gross profit in each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016 included the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the amount of $0.8 million ~~primarily from a reduction in spice product inventories.~~and $1.1 million, respectively.

Operating Expenses

In the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, operating expenses decreased ~~$(2.4)~~$(0.5) million, or ~~(4.8)~~(0.9)%, to ~~$48.7~~$51.8 million or ~~37.3%~~37.5% of net sales, from ~~$51.1~~$52.3 million, or ~~38.3%~~38.9% of net sales, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, primarily due to ~~lower~~a $(1.8) million decrease in general and administrative expenses and a $(0.6) million decrease in restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan, ~~an increase in net gains from sales of assets and earnout from the sale of Spice Assets, and lower general and administrative expenses,~~ partially offset by ana $1.9 million increase in selling expenses. Restructuring and other transition expenses in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 also include expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan.

General and administrative expenses decreased ~~$(2.4)~~$(1.8) million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to $1.9 million in lower employee and retiree medical costs, partially offset by $0.3 million in acquisition-related consulting expenses and $0.2 million in non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred $0.2 million in expenses incurred in connection with successfully defending against a proxy contest (the "2016 proxy contest"), including non-recurring legal fees, financial advisory fees, proxy solicitor fees, mailing and printing costs of proxy solicitation materials and other costs that were in excess of the level of expenses normally incurred for an annual meeting of stockholders.

Restructuring and other transition expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased $(0.6) million, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year because ~~a majority~~most of the planned expenses related to our Corporate Relocation Plan have already been recognized in prior ~~periods. Net gains from sales of assets, primarily from real estate, were $1.5~~periods, partially offset by $1.3 million in costs incurred in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 as compared to net gains from sales of assets, primarily vehicles, of $0.2~~March 31, 2017 associated with the DSD Restructuring Plan.

Selling expenses increased $1.9 million induring the three months ended September 30, 2015. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we also recognized $0.2 million in earnout from the sale of Spice Assets. General and administrative expenses decreased $(0.5) million in the three months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to ~~lower accruals for~~$1.3 million from the consolidation of China Mist and West Coast Coffee and $0.5 million in operations-related consulting expenses, partially offset by a $0.5 million reduction in incentive compensation expense and $0.5 million in lower workers' compensation expense.

In each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 net gains from sale of Spice Assets included $0.3 million in earnout.

In the nine months ended March 31, 2017, operating expenses decreased $(31.3) million, or (20.7)%, to ~~eligible employees,~~$119.6 million or 29.3% of net sales, from $150.9 million, or 36.8% of net sales, in the nine months ended March 31, 2016, primarily due to the recognition of $37.4 million in net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility and lower ~~employee medical~~restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan, partially offset by the absence of net gain from the sale of Spice Assets, and an increase in general and administrative expenses and selling expenses.

Restructuring and other transition expenses decreased $(4.3) million in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year because most of the planned expenses related to our Corporate Relocation Plan have already been recognized in prior periods, partially offset by $1.3 million in costs incurred in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 associated with the DSD Restructuring Plan.

Selling expenses increased $5.2 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to operations-related consulting expenses, higher depreciation expense, sales training expenses and the consolidation of China Mist and West Coast Coffee, partially offset by lower workers' compensation expense, savings from utilizing 3PL for our long-haul distribution and the absence of expenses related to the institutional spice assets.

General and administrative expenses increased $2.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to non-recurring 2016 proxy contest expenses, partially offset by lower expenses associated with the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”)resulting from the payoff of one of the two ESOP loans, and the reversal of rent expense related to the New Facility under the Lease Agreement upon closing of the purchase option, partially offset by non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses, higher consulting expenses related to acquisition activity, and higher salaries and related expenses.loans. During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we incurred ~~$1.3~~$5.2 million, or $0.31 per share, in expenses ~~stemming from~~successfully defending against the 2016 proxy contest including non-recurring legal fees, financial advisory fees, proxy solicitor fees, mailing and printing ~~cost~~costs of proxy solicitation materials and other costs. ~~For information about~~

During the ~~2016 proxy contest, refer to Part II,~~ ~~Item 1A~~, ~~Risk Factors, of this report. Selling expenses increased $2.0 million during the three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017, net gains from the sale of Spice Assets included $0.8 million in earnout, as compared to $5.4 million in net gains from the sale of Spice Assets in the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year,~~year. Net gains from sales of other assets, primarily ~~due~~from the sale of our Northern California branch property, were $1.5 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to ~~higher vehicle depreciation, bad debt expense, acquisition-related consulting expense and sales training expense, partially offset by lower expenses related to~~$0.2 million, primarily from sale of equipment, in the ~~institutional spice assets and savings from utilizing third-party logistics for our long haul distribution.~~nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Income from Operations

Income from operations in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~$2.5~~$2.1 million as compared to ~~loss from operations of $(0.6)~~$0.3 million in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016. Income from operations in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 was $40.5 million as compared to $5.1 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

The higher income from operations in the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the comparable prior fiscal year period was primarily due to higher gross profit, ~~net gains from sales of assets including the earnout from the sale of Spice Assets,~~lower general and administrative expenses, lower restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan, and ~~lower general and administrative expenses,~~higher net gains from sales of other assets, partially offset by higher selling ~~expenses.~~expenses and lower net gains from the sale of Spice Assets.

The higher income from operations in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the comparable prior fiscal year period was primarily due to net gains from the sales of the Torrance Facility and other real estate, lower restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan and higher gross profit, partially offset by higher selling expenses, higher general and administrative expenses and lower net gains from the sale of Spice Assets.

Total Other Income (Expense)

Total other income and other expense in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017 was $0.9 million and $(1.3) million, respectively, compared to total other income of $0.9 million in each of the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016. Total other income in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~$0.2 million compared to total other expense of $(0.6) million during the comparable period in the prior fiscal year,~~ primarily due to net gains on investments and derivative instruments ~~and investments of $0.2 million,~~ partially offset by higher interest expense as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net gains and net losses on ~~derivative instruments and~~ investments ~~of $(0.9) million~~resulting from mark-to-market in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015. The~~March 31, 2017 were $0.7 million and $(0.4) million, respectively, as compared to net gains on investments of $2,000 and $0.1 million, respectively, in the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year. Net gains and net losses on derivative instruments ~~and investments~~ in all the ~~three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively,~~reported periods were ~~primarily~~ due to mark-to-market net gains and net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. Net gains and net losses on such coffee-related derivative instruments in each of the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 were ~~$(35,000)~~$0.2 million and $(1.1) million, respectively, compared to ~~$(0.7)~~net gains of $0.2 million and net losses of $(0.5) million, respectively, in the comparable ~~period~~periods of the prior fiscal year. In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively,~~March 31, 2017, we recognized ~~$13,000~~$90,000 and $63,000, respectively, in net gains ~~and $(0.4) million in net losses~~ on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ~~ineffectiveness.~~ ineffectiveness, as compared to net losses of $(84,000) and $(0.6) million in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2016, respectively.

Interest expense in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2017, was $(0.5) million and $(1.4) million, respectively, as compared to $(0.1) million and $(0.3) million, respectively, in the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year. The higher interest expense in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 included $0.3 million~~March 31, 2017 was primarily due to higher loan balance. The higher interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 was primarily due to higher loan balance and non-recurring and non-cash interest expense onrelated to the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility ~~sale-leaseback financing obligation which~~

~~will be included~~ in the ~~computation~~amount of ~~the gain on sale of theTorrance Facility upon conclusion of the leaseback arrangement.~~$(0.7) million.

Income Taxes

In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we recorded income tax expense of ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million and $15.9 million, respectively, compared to ~~income tax benefit of $0.1~~$43,000 and $0.3 million in the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016, respectively. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, we released the majority of our valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. As of June 30, 2016, our net deferred tax assets totaled $80.8 million. In the three and nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 our deferred tax assets decreased by ~~$1.5~~$1.1 million and $14.7 million, respectively, primarily as a result of ~~applying net operating losses to offset current income tax payable.~~deferring the gain on the sale of the Torrance Facility.

The Internal Revenue Service completed its examination of our tax years ended June 30, 2013 and 2014 and accepted the returns as filed for those years.

Net Income

As a result of the foregoing factors, net income was $1.6 million, or $0.10 per diluted common share, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 as compared to ~~a net loss of $(1.1)~~$1.2 million, or ~~$(0.07)~~$0.07 per diluted common share, in the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Net income was $23.3 million, or $1.39 per diluted common share, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $5.7 million, or $0.34 per diluted common share, in the nine months ended March 31, 2016.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to net income determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our operating performance:

“Non-GAAP net income” is defined as net income ~~(loss)~~ excluding the impact of:

restructuring and other transition expenses;

net gains and losses from sales of assets;

non-cash income tax ~~benefit,~~expense (benefit), including the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets;

non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses; and

non-cash interest expense accrued on the Torrance Facility sale-leaseback financing obligation;

and including the impact of:

income taxes on non-GAAP adjustments.

“Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share” is defined as Non-GAAP net income divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.

“~~Adjusted~~ EBITDA”is defined as net income ~~(loss)~~ excluding the impact of:

income taxes;

interest expense; and

depreciation and amortization expense.

“EBITDA Margin” is defined as EBITDA expressed as a percentage of net sales.

“Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as net income excluding the impact of:

income taxes;

interest expense;

income from short-term investments;

depreciation and amortization expense;

ESOP and share-based compensation expense;

non-cash impairment losses;

non-cash pension withdrawal expense;

other similar non-cash expenses;

restructuring and other transition expenses;

net gains and losses from sales of assets; and

non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses.

“Adjusted EBITDA Margin” is defined as Adjusted EBITDA expressed as a percentage of net sales.

Restructuring and other transition expenses are expenses that are directly attributable to (i) the Corporate Relocation Plan, consisting primarily of employee retention and separation benefits, facility-related costs and other related costs such as travel, legal, consulting and other professional ~~services.~~services; and (ii) beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the DSD Restructuring Plan, consisting primarily of severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we modified the calculation of Non-GAAP net income and Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share (i) to exclude non-recurring expenses for legal and other professional services incurred in connection with the 2016 proxy contest that were in excess of the level of expenses normally incurred for an annual meeting of stockholders ("2016 proxy contest-related expenses") and non-cash interest expense accrued on the Torrance Facility sale-leaseback financing obligation which ~~will be~~has been included in the computation of the gain on sale upon conclusion of the leaseback arrangement, and (ii) to include income tax expense (benefit) on the non-GAAP adjustments based on the Company’s marginal tax rate of 39.0%. There was no similar adjustment for non-cash income tax expense in the ~~first quarter~~comparable period of the prior fiscal ~~2016~~year due to the valuation allowance recorded against the Company’s deferred tax ~~assets at September 30, 2015.~~assets. We also modified Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to exclude 2016 proxy contest-related expenses. These modifications to our non-GAAP financial measures were made because such expenses are not reflective of our ongoing operating results and adjusting for them will help investors with comparability of our results. The historical presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures was not affected by these modifications.

Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 and for all periods presented, we include EBITDA in our non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period by isolating the effects of certain items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. These potential differences may be caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net

operating losses) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense). We also present EBITDA and EBITDA Margin because (i) we believe that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry, (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness, and (iii) we use these measures internally as benchmarks to compare our performance to that of our competitors.

In the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we also modified the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA to exclude income from our short-term investments because we believe excluding income generated from our investment portfolio is a measure more reflective of our operating results. The historical presentation of Adjusted EBITDA was recast to be comparable to the current period presentation.

We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide a useful measure of the Company’s operating results, a meaningful comparison with historical results and with the results of other companies, and insight into the Company's ongoing operating performance. Further, management utilizes these measures, in addition to GAAP measures, when evaluating and comparing the Company's operating performance against internal financial forecasts and budgets.

Non-GAAP net income, Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share, EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We do not intend for non-GAAP financial measures to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net income ~~(loss)~~ to Non-GAAP net income and reported net income ~~(loss)~~ per common share-diluted to Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share (unaudited):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income (loss), as reported	$	1,618		$	(1,074	)
Net income, as reported							$	1,594		$	1,192		$	23,288		$	5,679
Restructuring and other transition expenses	3,030			5,450			2,547			3,169			9,542			13,855
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility							—			—			(37,449		)	—
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets	(158		)	—			(272		)	(335		)	(764		)	(5,441		)
Net gains from sales of assets	(1,553		)	(214		)
Non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses	1,270			—
Net gains from sales of other assets							(86		)	(4		)	(1,525		)	(163		)
Non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses							196			—			5,186			—
Interest expense on sale-leaseback financing obligation	310			—			—			—			681			—
Income tax expense on non-GAAP adjustments	(1,131		)	—
Income tax expense (benefit) on non-GAAP adjustments							(930		)	—			9,488			—
Non-GAAP net income	$	3,386		$	4,162		$	3,049		$	4,022		$	8,447		$	13,930

Net income (loss) per common share—diluted, as reported	$	0.10		$	(0.07	)
Net income per common share—diluted, as reported							$	0.10		$	0.07		$	1.39		$	0.34
Impact of restructuring and other transition expenses	$	0.18		$	0.33		$	0.15		$	0.19		$	0.57		$	0.83
Impact of net gain from sale of Torrance Facility							$	—		$	—		$	(2.24	)	$	—
Impact of net gains from sale of Spice Assets	$	(0.01	)	$	—		$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.33	)
Impact of net gains from sales of assets	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.01	)
Impact of non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses	$	0.08		$	—
Impact of net gains from sales of other assets							$	(0.01	)	$	—		$	(0.09	)	$	(0.01	)
Impact of non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses							$	0.01		$	—		$	0.31		$	—
Impact of interest expense on sale-leaseback financing obligation	$	0.02		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.04		$	—
Impact of income tax expense on non-GAAP adjustments	$	(0.07	)	$	—
Impact of income tax expense (benefit) on non-GAAP adjustments							$	(0.06	)	$	—		$	0.57		$	—
Non-GAAP net income per diluted common share	$	0.21		$	0.25		$	0.17		$	0.24		$	0.50		$	0.83

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net income ~~(loss)~~to EBITDA (unaudited):



	Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income, as reported	$	1,594		$	1,192		$	23,288		$	5,679
Income tax expense	1,411			43			15,910			318
Interest expense	517			111			1,430			341
Depreciation and amortization expense	6,527			5,234			16,613			15,721
EBITDA	$	10,049		$	6,580		$	57,241		$	22,059
EBITDA Margin	7.3		%	4.9		%	14.0		%	5.4		%

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net income to Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income (loss), as reported	$	1,618		$	(1,074	)
Income tax expense (benefit)	1,083			(88		)
Net income, as reported							$	1,594		$	1,192		$	23,288		$	5,679
Income tax expense							1,411			43			15,910			318
Interest expense	389			121			517			111			1,430			341
Income from short-term investments							(1,156		)	(427		)	(882		)	(1,312		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	5,008			5,295			6,527			5,234			16,613			15,721
ESOP and share-based compensation expense	942			1,229			902			837			2,996			3,488
Restructuring and other transition expenses	3,030			5,450			2,547			3,169			9,542			13,855
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility							—			—			(37,449		)	—
Net gains from sale of Spice Assets	(158		)	—			(272		)	(335		)	(764		)	(5,441		)
Net gains from sales of assets	(1,553		)	(214		)
Non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses	1,270			—
Net gains from sales of other assets							(86		)	(4		)	(1,525		)	(163		)
Non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses							196			—			5,186			—
Adjusted EBITDA	$	11,629		$	10,719		$	12,180		$	9,820		$	34,345		$	32,486
Adjusted EBITDA Margin	8.9		%	8.0		%	8.8		%	7.3		%	8.4		%	7.9		%

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition

Credit Facility

We maintain a $75.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with a sublimit on letters of credit and swingline loans of $30.0 million and $15.0 million respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby we may increase the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on our eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory, and the value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee ranges from 0.25% to 0.375% per annum based on average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of our assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, machinery and equipment (other than inventory), and our preferred stock portfolio. Borrowings under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. We are subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the right of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reduce the amount of credit otherwise available to us. We are allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility expires on March 2, 2020.

At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we were eligible to borrow up to a total of ~~$57.5~~$61.7 million under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings of ~~$0.2~~$44.2 million, utilized ~~$11.9~~$4.4 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of ~~$45.4~~$13.1 million. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was ~~1.66%~~2.52%. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.

At ~~October 31, 2016,~~April 30, 2017, we had estimated outstanding borrowings of ~~$0.2~~$44.2 million, utilized ~~$11.9~~$4.4 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of ~~$46.5~~$13.1 million. At ~~October 31, 2016,~~April 30, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was ~~1.65%~~2.66%.

Liquidity

We generally finance our operations through cash flows from operations and borrowings under our Revolving Facility described above. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had ~~$16.5~~$5.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and ~~$26.0~~$26.5 million in short-term investments. We believe our Revolving Facility, to the extent available, in addition to our cash flows from operations and other liquid assets, collectively, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 to 18 months including ~~the expected capital expenditures associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan,~~ additional construction costs to complete the New Facility and anticipated capital expenditures for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related ~~expenditures.~~expenditures and the expected expenditures associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan and DSD Restructuring Plan.

Changes in Cash Flows

We generate cash from operating activities primarily from cash collections related to the sale of our products.

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$3.8~~$10.5 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 compared to ~~$11.4~~$9.4 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. The ~~lower~~higher level of net cash provided by operating activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 compared to the ~~comparable~~same period of the prior fiscal year was primarily due to a higher ~~level of cash outflows from operating activities from payments of payroll expenses including accrued bonuses to eligible employees, increase in inventories~~net income and accounts receivable balances and purchase of trading securities held for investment, partially offset by cash inflows from decreases in derivative assets and increases in accounts payable balances. In the three months ended September 30, 2015, the higher level of net cash provided by operating activities was due to a higher level of cash inflows from ~~increases~~operating activities primarily from the increase in deferred income taxes and accounts payable balances, ~~including the expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan,~~ partially offset by cash outflows from increases in inventory and accounts receivable balances, payment of previously accrued bonus and restructuring and other transition expenses related to the Corporate Relocation Plan, cash outflows from purchases of short-term investments and a decrease in derivative assets. Net cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended March 31, 2016 was due to cash inflows from operating activities resulting primarily from an increase in ~~inventories,~~ derivative assets and proceeds from sales of short-term investments partially offset by cash outflows from purchases of short-term investments, increases in accounts receivable and inventory balances, and payments of accounts payable balances and accrued payroll ~~expenses.~~and other liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities in the nine months ended March 31, 2016 included the release of restriction on $1.0 million in cash held in coffee-related derivative margin accounts, as we had a net gain position in such accounts.

Net cash used in investing activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~$22.5~~$84.0 million as compared to ~~$3.2~~$23.7 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. In the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities included ~~$2.0 million in proceeds from sale of assets, primarily real estate, partially offset by $10.2~~$35.5 million in cash used for purchases of property, plant and equipment, ~~and $14.4~~$26.7 million in purchases of construction-in-progress assets in connection with the construction of the New ~~Facility.~~Facility and $25.9 million net of cash acquired in connection with the China Mist and West Coast Coffee acquisitions, partially offset by $4.0 million in proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, primarily real estate. In the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, net cash used in investing activities included ~~$3.8~~$16.2 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment and $13.5 million in purchases of construction-in-progress assets in connection with construction of the New Facility, partially offset by proceeds from sales of assets ~~primarily vehicles,~~ of ~~$0.5 million.~~$6.0 million, including $5.3 million in proceeds from the sale of Spice Assets.

Net cash provided by financing activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~$14.1~~$58.1 million as compared to ~~net cash used in financing activities of $0.6~~$12.5 million in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 included $42.5 million in proceeds from ~~sale-leaseback financing associated with~~ the sale of the Torrance Facility, $44.1 million in net borrowings under our Revolving Facility primarily to pay for the China Mist and West Coast Coffee acquisitions and for expenditures related to the Corporate Relocation Plan, $7.7 million in proceeds from lease financing in connection with the purchase of the partially constructed New Facility, ~~$0.1 million in borrowings under our Revolving Facility~~ and ~~$0.1~~$0.8 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $35.8 million in repayments on lease financing to acquire the partially constructed New Facility upon purchase option closing, and ~~$0.4~~$1.1 million used to pay capital lease obligations. Net cash ~~used in~~provided by financing activities in the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 included ~~$28,000 used for repayments on~~$13.5 million in proceeds from lease financing in connection with the construction of the New Facility,

$0.2 million in net borrowings under our Revolving Facility, ~~$0.9~~and $1.6 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $2.7 million to pay capital lease obligations, ~~and~~ $8,000 in deferred financing costs for the Revolving Facility, ~~partially offset by $0.3~~and $0.2 million in ~~proceeds from stock option exercises.~~tax withholding payments associated with net share settlement of equity awards.

Sale of Spice Assets

In order to focus on our core product offerings, in the second quarter of fiscal 2016, we completed the sale of certain assets associated with our manufacture, processing and distribution of raw, processed and blended spices and certain other culinary products to Harris. See Note 56, Sales of Assets—Sale of Spice Assets, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Sale of Torrance Facility

On July 15, 2016, we completed the ~~previously announced~~ sale of the Torrance Facility for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million. Following the closing of the sale, we leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, ~~subject to~~and exercised two one-month extensions ~~at our option~~ at a base rent of $100,000 per month. ~~If we are not able to vacate the property by the end of the~~

~~second extended period, the month-to-month base rent will increase to $200,000. As of September 30, 2016,~~We vacated the Torrance Facility ~~continued to house certain administrative functions~~in December 2016 and ~~serve as~~concluded the leaseback transaction. Accordingly, in the nine months ended March 31, 2017, we recognized a ~~distribution facility and branch warehouse pending transition~~net gain from the sale of the ~~remaining~~ Torrance ~~operations to~~Facility in the amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.7 million and non-cash rent expense of $1.4 million, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in “Other current liabilities” on our ~~other facilities.~~consolidated balance sheet. See Note 56, Sale of Assets—Sale of Torrance Facility and Note 67, Assets Held for Sale, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item ~~1of~~1 of this report.

~~Torrance Facility Exit Costs~~Acquisitions

~~Based on current assumptions and subject to continued implementation~~On October 11, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the ~~Corporate Relocation~~assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of $11.7 million, which included $11.2 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $0.4 million and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. On February 7, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.7 million including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. We funded the purchase price for these acquisitions with proceeds under our Revolving Facility and cash flows from operations. See Note 3, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

DSD Restructuring Plan

On February 21, 2017, we announced the DSD Restructuring Plan. We estimate that we will recognize approximately $3.7 million to $4.9 million of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately $1.9 million to $2.7 million in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and $1.8 million to $2.2 million in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. Expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 consisted of $0.9 million in employee-related costs and $0.4 million in other related costs. As of March 31, 2017, we had paid a total of $0.1 million of these costs and had a balance of $1.2 million in DSD Restructuring Plan-related liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or associated with, the DSD Restructuring Plan. We expect to complete the DSD Restructuring Plan by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018. See Note 4, Restructuring Plans-DSD Restructuring Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Corporate Relocation Plan

We estimated that we would incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the ~~exit of the Torrance Facility~~Corporate Relocation Plan consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan in fiscal 2015 through ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we have recognized a total of ~~$28.0 million of the estimated $31~~$31.5 million in aggregate cash costs, including ~~$16.6~~$17.4 million in employee retention and

separation benefits, ~~$4.5~~$6.7 million in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company's headquarters, relocation of our Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and ~~$6.8~~$7.4 million in other related costs recorded in “Restructuring and other transition expenses” in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. ~~The remainder is expected~~We expect to ~~be recognized~~complete the Corporate Relocation Plan and recognize an additional $0.1 million in other related costs in the ~~second and third quarters~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. Additionally, ~~we recognized~~ from inception through ~~fiscal 2016 $2.0 million in~~March 31, 2017, we recognized non-cash depreciation expense of $2.3 million associated with the Torrance production ~~facility.~~facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. We may incur certain ~~other~~ pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation ~~Plan.~~Plan which are not included in the estimated $31 million in aggregate cash costs. See Note 34, Restructuring Plans—Corporate Relocation Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Purchase Option Exercise

On September 15, 2016, we closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million, consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred for the partially constructed New Facility as of the Purchase Option Closing Date, plus the option exercise fee, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. The Purchase Price was paid in cash from proceeds received from the sale of the Torrance Facility. Upon closing of the purchase option, we recorded the aggregate purchase price of the New Facility in "Property, plant and equipment, net" on our consolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in "Property, plant and equipment, net," the offsetting liability for the lease obligation included in "Other long-term liabilities" and the rent expense related to the land were reversed. See Note 45, New Facility—Lease Agreement and Purchase Option Exercise, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

New Facility Costs

On September 17, 2016, we entered into the Amended Building Contract pursuant to which we will pay Builder up to a maximum of $21.4 million for Builder’s pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment that will be installed in portions of the New Facility. See ~~Note 4~~, ~~New Facility—New Facility Construction Contract, and~~ ~~Note 18~~, ~~Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.~~

Based on the ~~final budget,~~current forecast, we estimate that the total construction costs including the cost of the land for the New Facility will be approximately ~~$55~~$60 million ~~to $60 million;~~ of which we have ~~spent $42.5~~paid an aggregate of $54.7 million as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017 and have outstanding contractual obligations of $5.5 million as of March 31, 2017. In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, we expect to incur approximately $35 million to $39 million ~~in anticipated capital expenditures~~ for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related ~~expenditures. As~~expenditures of ~~September 30, 2016,~~which we have ~~spent $12.7~~paid an aggregate of $20.2 million ~~towards~~as of March 31, 2017, including $15.7 million under the ~~purchase~~Amended Building Contract, and have outstanding contractual obligations of ~~machinery~~$6.2 million as of March 31, 2017. See Note 5, New Facility, and ~~equipment, furniture~~Note 20,Commitments and ~~fixtures, and related expenditures for~~Contingencies, of the ~~New Facility.~~Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures for the New Facility ~~are expected to be~~were incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. Construction of and relocation to the New Facility ~~are expected to be~~were substantially completed in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. ~~See~~ ~~Note 4~~, ~~New Facility, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.~~

The following table summarizes the expenditures ~~incurred~~paid for the New Facility as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 as compared to the final budget:


	Expenditures incurred						Budget				Expenditures paid						Budget
(In thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016		Through Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016		Total		Lower bound		Upper bound		Nine Months Ended March 31, 2017		Through Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016		Total		Lower bound		Upper bound
Building and facilities, including land	$	14,429	$	28,110	$	42,539	$	55,000	$	60,000	$	26,606	$	28,110	$	54,716	$	55,000	$	60,000
Machinery and equipment; furniture and fixtures	6,886		5,853		12,739		35,000		39,000		15,764		4,443		20,207		35,000		39,000
Total	$	21,315	$	33,963	$	55,278	$	90,000	$	99,000	$	42,370	$	32,553	$	74,923	$	90,000	$	99,000

Capital Expenditures

For the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ our capital expenditures were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2016		2015		2017		2016
Coffee brewing equipment	$	3,157	$	1,603	$	8,280	$	5,679
Building and facilities	—		883		230		200
Vehicles, machinery and equipment	49		795		9,439		7,060
Software, office furniture and equipment	29		500		1,831		1,320
Total Capital Expenditures Excluding New Facility	$	3,235	$	3,781
Total capital expenditures excluding New Facility					$	19,780	$	14,259
New Facility:
Building and facilities, including land	$	14,429	$	—	$	26,606	$	13,492
Vehicles, machinery and equipment	4,910		—
Machinery and equipment					11,774		1,934
Software, office furniture and equipment	1,976		—		3,990		—
Total capital expenditures	$	24,550	$	3,781	$	62,150	$	29,685

As we complete the first phase of capital spending on our New Facility, we anticipate spending between $16 million to $18 million in capital expenditures in the remainder of fiscal 2017. Our expected capital expenditures for fiscal 2017 unrelated to the New Facility include expenditures to replace normal wear and tear of coffee brewing equipment, vehicles, machinery and equipment and mobile sales solution hardware, and are expected to be ~~consistent with the average capital expenditures~~$2.5 million to $3.5 million for the ~~past~~remainder of fiscal 2017 and approximately $20 million to $22 million, annually.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $6.5 million and $5.2 million, in the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $16.6 million and $15.7 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We anticipate depreciation and amortization expense to increase to $7.0 million to $7.5 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~years.~~2017. We also anticipate our depreciation and amortization expense will be approximately $8.0 million to $8.5 million per quarter in fiscal 2018 based on our existing fixed asset commitments and the useful lives of our intangible assets.

Working Capital

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2016, our working capital was composed of the following:

September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Current assets $ 155,770
$ 153,365
Current liabilities(1) 103,604
56,837
Working capital $ 52,166
$ 96,528

~~__________~~

~~(1) Includes, as of September 30, 2016, $42.8 million in sale-leaseback financing obligation.~~



	March 31, 2017		June 30, 2016
(In thousands)
Current assets	$	148,488	$	153,365
Current liabilities	116,103		56,837
Working capital	$	32,385	$	96,528

Contractual Obligations

As part of the China Mist transaction, we assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing 17,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice. As part of the West Coast Coffee transaction, we entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing 20,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of 24,150 square feet in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020.

The following table contains information regarding total contractual obligations as of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, including capital leases:


	Payment due by period										Payment due by period
(In thousands)	Total		Less Than One Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years		Total		Less Than One Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Contractual obligations:
Operating lease obligations	$	11,351	$	3,052	$	6,437	$	1,801	$	61	$	12,832	$	1,233	$	8,482	$	2,931	$	186
Building construction contract(1)	14,800		14,800		—		—		—
New Facility construction and equipment contracts(1)											11,698		11,698		—		—		—
Capital lease obligations(2)	2,050		988		1,007		55		—		1,572		341		1,176		55		—
Pension plan obligations	87,931		6,056		16,858		17,918		47,099		84,011		1,973		16,858		17,918		47,262
Postretirement benefits other than pension plans	11,687		810		2,245		2,386		6,246		11,147		270		2,245		2,386		6,246
Revolving credit facility	200		200		—		—		—		44,175		44,175		—		—		—
Purchase commitments(3)	78,881		78,385		496		—		—		79,503		41,919		37,584		—		—
Total contractual obligations	$	206,900	$	104,291	$	27,043	$	22,160	$	53,406	$	244,938	$	101,609	$	66,345	$	23,290	$	53,694

______________

(1) Includes $5.5 million in outstanding contractual obligations for construction of the New Facility and $6.2 million outstanding contractual obligations under the Amended Building Contract as of March 31, 2017. See Note 45, New Facility, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

(2) Includes imputed interest of $0.1 million.

(3) Purchase commitments include commitments under coffee purchase contracts for which all delivery terms have been finalized but the related coffee has not been received as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Amounts shown in the table above: (a) include all coffee purchase contracts that the Company considers to be from normal purchases; and (b) do not include amounts related to derivative instruments that are recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling ~~$65.0~~$68.9 million under fixed-price contracts, ~~$1.2 million in~~ equipment for the New Facility totaling $0.5 million and ~~$12.7~~other purchases totaling $10.1 million ~~in other inventory~~ under non-cancelable purchase orders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.



Item ~~7A.~~3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market value risk arising from changes in interest rates on our securities portfolio. Our portfolio of preferred securities has sometimes included investments in derivative instruments that provide a natural economic hedge of interest rate risk. We review the interest rate sensitivity of these securities and may enter into “short positions” in futures contracts on U.S. Treasury securities or hold put options on such futures contracts to reduce the impact of certain interest rate changes. Specifically, we attempt to manage the risk arising from changes in the general level of interest rates. We do not transact in futures contracts or put options for speculative purposes. The number and type of futures and options contracts entered into depends on, among other items, the specific maturity and issuer redemption provisions for each preferred stock held, the slope of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, the expected volatility of U.S. Treasury yields, and the costs of using futures and/or options.

The following table demonstrates the impact of varying interest rate changes based on our preferred securities holdings and market yield and price relationships at ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. This table is predicated on an “instantaneous” change

in the general level of interest rates and assumes predictable relationships between the prices of our preferred securities holdings and the yields on U.S. Treasury securities. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had no futures contracts or put

options with respect to our preferred securities portfolio designated as interest rate risk hedges.


($ in thousands)	Market Value of Preferred Securities at September 30, 2016		Change in Market Value			Market Value of Preferred Securities at March 31, 2017		Change in Market Value
Interest Rate Changes
–150 basis points	$	27,064	$	1,047		$	27,940	$	1,399
–100 basis points	$	26,843	$	826		$	27,561	$	1,020
Unchanged	$	26,017	$	—		$	26,541	$	—
+100 basis points	$	25,022	$	(995	)	$	25,477	$	(1,064	)
+150 basis points	$	24,540	$	(1,477	)	$	24,952	$	(1,589	)

Borrowings under our Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%.

At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings of ~~$0.2~~$44.2 million, utilized ~~$11.9~~$4.4 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of ~~$45.4~~$13.1 million. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 was ~~1.66%~~2.52%.

The following table demonstrates the impact of interest rate changes on our annual interest expense on outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility, excluding interest on letters of credit, based on the weighted average interest rate on the loan as of March 31, 2017:



($ in thousands)	Principal	Interest Rate		Annual Interest Expense
–150 basis points	$44,175	1.11	%	$	490,343
–100 basis points	$44,175	1.61	%	$	711,218
Unchanged	$44,175	2.61	%	$	1,152,968
+100 basis points	$44,175	3.61	%	$	1,594,718
+150 basis points	$44,175	4.11	%	$	1,815,593

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to commodity price risk arising from changes in the market price of green coffee. We value green coffee inventory on the LIFO basis. In the normal course of business we hold a large green coffee inventory and enter into forward commodity purchase agreements with suppliers. We are subject to price risk resulting from the volatility of green coffee prices. Due to competition and market conditions, volatile price increases cannot always be passed on to our customers.

We purchase over-the-counter ~~coffee~~coffee-related derivative instruments to enable us to lock in the price of green coffee commodity purchases. These derivative instruments also may be entered into at the direction of the customer under commodity-based pricing arrangements to effectively lock in the purchase price of green coffee under such customer arrangements, in certain cases up to 18 months or longer in the future. We account for certain coffee-related derivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in our quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods.

When we designate coffee-related derivative instruments as cash flow hedges, we formally document the hedging instruments and hedged items, and measure at each balance sheet date the effectiveness of our hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~respectively, we reclassified ~~$(0.5)~~$0.9 million in net gains and ~~$(5.0)~~$(2.7) million in net losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, excluding tax, respectively, into cost of goods sold from AOCI. For the nine months ended March 31,

2017 and 2016, we reclassified $0.6 million in net gains and $(11.5) million in net losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, excluding tax, respectively, into cost of goods sold from AOCI. Any ineffective portion of the derivative's change in fair value is recognized currently in “Other, net.” Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, we recognize any gain or loss deferred in AOCI in “Other, net” at that time. For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ we recognized in “Other, net” ~~$13,000~~$90,000 in net gains and ~~$(0.4)~~$(0.1) million in net losses, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness. For the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized in “Other, net” $63,000 in net gains and $(0.6) million in net losses, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.

For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.”

~~For~~ In each of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded in “Other, net” net gains of $0.2 million on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. For the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, we recorded in “Other, net” net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges in the amounts of ~~$(35,000)~~$(1.1) million and ~~$(0.7)~~$(0.5) million, respectively.

The following table summarizes the potential impact as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 to net income and AOCI from a hypothetical 10% change in coffee commodity prices. The information provided below relates only to the coffee-related derivative instruments and does not include, when applicable, the corresponding changes in the underlying hedged items:


	Increase (Decrease) to Net Income					Increase (Decrease) to AOCI					Increase (Decrease) to Net Income					Increase (Decrease) to AOCI
	10% Increase in Underlying Rate		10% Decrease in Underlying Rate			10% Increase in Underlying Rate		10% Decrease in Underlying Rate			10% Increase in Underlying Rate		10% Decrease in Underlying Rate			10% Increase in Underlying Rate		10% Decrease in Underlying Rate
(In thousands)
Coffee-related derivative instruments(1)	$	110	$	(110	)	$	2,256	$	(2,256	)	$	18	$	(18	)	$	1,702	$	(1,702	)

__________

(1) The Company's purchase contracts that qualify as normal purchases include green coffee purchase commitments for which the price has been locked in as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. These contracts are not included in the sensitivity analysis above as the underlying price has been fixed.



Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our ~~Chief Executive Officer~~principal executive and ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management has determined that there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) during our fiscal quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION



Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

The information set forth in Note 20, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.



Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Our DSD Restructuring Plan may be unsuccessful or less successful than we presently anticipate, which may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

On February 21, 2017, we announced the DSD Restructuring Plan in an effort to realign functions into a channel based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in implementing the DSD Restructuring Plan in a timely manner or at all, or that such efforts will not interfere with our ability to achieve our business objectives. The DSD Restructuring Plan costs may be greater than anticipated which could cause us to incur indebtedness in amounts in excess of expectations. We may be ~~negatively affected as a result~~unable to realize the contemplated benefits in connection with the reduction in workforce and other potential restructuring activities, which may have an adverse impact on our performance. Moreover, reductions in force can be difficult to manage, may cause concerns from current and potential customers, suppliers and other third parties with whom we do business which may cause them to delay or curtail doing business with us, may increase the likelihood of ~~actions~~key employees leaving the Company or may make it more difficult to recruit new employees, and may have an adverse impact on our business. If we fail to achieve our objectives of ~~Carol Farmer Waite, which actions could adversely impact~~ the ~~trading value~~DSD Restructuring Plan, further restructuring may be necessary. Management continues to analyze the Company’s DSD organization and evaluate other potential restructuring opportunities in light of the Company’s ~~common stock.~~

Carol Farmer Waite, together with those individuals who have filed a Schedule 13D with Ms. Waite (the “Waite Group”), have notified the Company that they intend to nominate a slate of three nominees for election as directors in opposition to the nominees recommended by the Company’s Board of Directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). The Waite Group has filed a definitive proxy statement with the SEC in connection with its solicitation of proxies from our stockholders to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date for the Annual Meeting, the Waite Group owned collectively 4,184,618 shares of our common stock representing approximately 24.9% of our outstanding common stock, including 2,477,728 shares held in trusts forstrategic priorities which one or more co-trustees are not participants in the Waite Group solicitation. Responding to actions by stockholders like the Waite Group can be costly and time-consuming, disruptive to operations and divert the attention of management and employees. Specifically, a proxy contest for the slate of three directors at the Annual Meeting will require us to incur significant proxy solicitation expenses and legal and other advisory expenses and require significant time and attention by management and our Board of Directors. In proxy contests, the range of potential outcomes may include a negotiated settlement prior to the vote of stockholders. The outcomes from any such negotiated settlement prior to the stockholder vote can involve a range of alternatives, both monetary and non-monetary, and an assessment of the potential impact from any such settlement is not determinable at this time. The Waite Group has disclosed in its definitive proxy statement that it intends to seek reimbursement from the Company of all expenses it incurs in connection with its solicitation. As a result, if the Waite Group is successful, we may also bear the costs of the Waite Group’s proxy solicitation expenses. In addition, the election of the Waite Group’s three nominees, combined with Farmer family representatives already on the Board (as well as the potential resignation of one current board member if the Waite Group nominees are elected), would effectively change control of the Company’s Board of Directors. The result of such a change of control of the Board of Directors could ~~potentially~~ result in additional restructuring charges the ~~replacement~~amount of ~~senior management as well as changes concerning, among other things, our operations, strategy, capital allocation, business or other matters. We cannot predict, and no assurances can~~which could be ~~given, as to the outcome or timing of any matters relating to the foregoing.~~material.



Item 6.	Exhibits

See Exhibit Index.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




	FARMER BROS. CO.

	By:		/s/Michael H. Keown
			Michael H. Keown President and Chief Executive Officer (chief executive officer)
			~~November 9, 2016~~May 10, 2017

	By:		/s/~~Isaac N. Johnston, Jr.~~ David G. Robson
			~~Isaac N. Johnston, Jr.~~ David G. Robson Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
			~~November 9, 2016~~May 10, 2017

EXHIBIT INDEX



2.1		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Harris Spice Company Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).*

2.2		Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 9, 2016, among Tea Leaf Acquisition Corp., China Mist Brands, Inc., certain stockholders of China Mist Brands, Inc., for certain limited purposes, Daniel W. Schweiker and John S. Martinson, and Daniel W. Schweiker, in his capacity as the sellers’ representative (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).*

3.1		Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 filed with the SEC on September 16, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.3		Certificate of Elimination (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on September 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1		Specimen Stock Certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the SEC on September 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference) .

4.2		Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 16, 2016, among Farmer Bros. Co. and the Investors identified on the signature pages thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 21, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Credit Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2015, by and among Farmer Bros. Co., Coffee Bean International, Inc., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K ~~for~~filed with the ~~period ended~~SEC on March 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2		Joinder Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2016, by and among China Mist Brands, Inc., Farmer Bros. Co., as the Borrower’s Representative, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, under that certain Credit Agreement dated as of March 2, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3		Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of March 2, 2015, by and among Farmer Bros. Co., Coffee Bean International, Inc., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K ~~for~~filed with the ~~period ended~~SEC on March 6, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.3~~10.4		Joinder to Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of October 11, 2016, by and among Farmer Bros. Co., Coffee Bean International, Inc., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., China Mist Brands, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5		Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on November 5, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.4~~10.6		Amendment No. 1 to Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan effective June 30, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).**




~~10.5~~10.7		Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Retirement Plan, effective as of December 6, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.6~~10.8		Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on February 10, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**



~~10.7~~10.9		Amendment to Farmer Bros. Co. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 10, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.8~~10.10		Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as adopted by the Board of Directors on December 9, 2010 and effective as of January 1, 2010 (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.9~~10.11		Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on September 7, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.10~~10.12		Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.11~~10.13		Action of the Administrative Committee of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans amending the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan, effective as of January 1, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.12~~10.14		Amendment dated October 6, 2016 to Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.13~~10.15		ESOP Loan Agreement including ESOP Pledge Agreement and Promissory Note, dated March 28, 2000, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.14~~10.16		Amendment No. 1 to ESOP Loan Agreement, dated June 30, 2003, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.15~~10.17		ESOP Loan Agreement No. 2 including ESOP Pledge Agreement and Promissory Note, dated July 21, 2003 between Farmer Bros. Co. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee for the Farmer Bros Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.16~~10.18		Employment Agreement, dated March 9, 2012, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Michael H. Keown (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 13, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.17~~		Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2013, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.18~~		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2014, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference)herewith).**



10.19		Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015, between Farmer Bros. Co. and Mark J. Nelson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 30, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.20~~		Employment Agreement, dated as of December 2, 2014, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Barry C. Fischetto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 5, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.21~~		Employment Agreement, effective as of May 27, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Scott W. Bixby (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 20, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.22~~10.20		Employment Agreement, effective as of August 6, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Thomas J. Mattei, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.21		Employment Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Isaac N. Johnston, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.22		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2017, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and David G. Robson (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.23		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2017, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Ellen D. Iobst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.24		Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2017, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Scott A. Siers (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.25		Form of First Amendment to Employment Agreement entered into between Farmer Bros. Co. and each of Michael H. Keown, David G. Robson, Ellen D. Iobst, Scott W. Bixby, Scott A. Siers and Thomas J. Mattei, Jr. (filed herewith).**

10.26		Confidential General Release and Separation Agreement by and between Barry C. Fischetto and Farmer Bros. Co. dated February 17, 2017 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 17, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.27		Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan, as amended (as approved by the stockholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 6, 2012) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 12, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.24~~10.28		Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as approved by the stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 5, 2013) (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 11, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.25~~10.29		Addendum to Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on February 9, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.26~~10.30		Form of Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.27~~10.31		Form of Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan Stock Option Grant Notice and Stock Option Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.28~~10.32		Form of Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 4, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.29~~10.33		Form of Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**




~~10.30~~10.34		Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executive Officers (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).**

~~10.31~~10.35		Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers of the Company (with schedule of executive officers attached) (filed ~~as Exhibit 10.3~~herewith).**

10.36		Form of First Amendment to ~~the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2015~~Change in Control Severance Agreement entered into between Farmer Bros. Co. and ~~incorporated herein by reference)~~each of Michael H. Keown, David G. Robson, Ellen D. Iobst, Scott W. Bixby, Scott A. Siers and Thomas J. Mattei, Jr. (filed herewith).**

~~10.32~~10.37		Form of Indemnification Agreement for Directors and Officers of the Company, as adopted on December 5, 2013 (with schedule of indemnitees attached) (filed as Exhibit ~~10.2~~10.4 to the ~~Company's~~Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on ~~September 29, 2015~~February 23, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).**



~~10.33~~10.38		Lease Agreement, dated as of July 17, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.34~~10.39		First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of December 29, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.35~~10.40		Amendment No. 2 to Lease Agreement dated as of March 10, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.36~~10.41		Termination of Lease Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Tenant, and WF-FB NLTX, LLC as Landlord (filed ~~herewith)~~as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016).

~~10.37~~10.42		Development Management Agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 23, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.38~~10.43		First Amendment to Development Management Agreement dated as of January 1, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.39~~10.44		Second Amendment to Development Management Agreement dated as of March 25, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co., as Tenant and Stream Realty Partners-DFW, L.P., as Developer (filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.40~~10.45		AIA Document A141 - 2014, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Design-Builder, dated as of September 22, 2015, between Farmer Bros. Co. and The Haskell Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 22, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.41~~10.46		Change Order No. 12, dated as of September 17, 2016, between Farmer Bros. Co. and The Haskell Company (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 22, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.42~~

10.47		Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of April 11, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. as Seller, and Bridge Acquisition, LLC as Buyer (filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.43~~10.48		First Amendment to Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated as of June 1, 2016, by and between Farmer Bros. Co. and Bridge Acquisition, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on September 14, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1		Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2		Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1		Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).




32.2		Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).

101		The following financial statements from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, ~~(Loss),~~ (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (furnished herewith).

________________



*	Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules and/or exhibits to this agreement have been omitted. The Registrant undertakes to supplementally furnish copies of the omitted schedules and/or exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**	Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

4758