UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     
Commission file number: 001-34249
FARMER BROS. CO.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware95-0725980
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)Incorporation of Organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1912 Farmer Brothers Drive, Northlake, Texas 76262
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)
888-998-2468682-549-6600
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 per shareFARMNasdaq Global Select Market
None
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  ýYes      NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    YES  ýYes      NO  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 
Large accelerated filer¨

Accelerated filerý
Non-accelerated filer¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    
YES ¨ NO  ý
As of February 6, 2018,April 28, 2022, the registrant had 16,899,66718,448,058 shares outstanding of its common stock, par value $1.00 per share, which is the registrant’s only class of common stock.




TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page








PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Item 1. Financial Statements
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
ASSETS   ASSETS
Current assets:   Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$5,414
 $6,241
Cash and cash equivalents$10,378 $10,263 
Short-term investments
 368
Accounts receivable, net62,275
 46,446
Restricted cashRestricted cash175 175 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $369 and $325, respectivelyAccounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $369 and $325, respectively47,443 40,321 
Inventories73,284
 56,251
Inventories100,645 76,791 
Income tax receivable206
 318
Short-term derivative assetsShort-term derivative assets6,088 4,351 
Prepaid expenses9,176
 7,540
Prepaid expenses4,834 5,594 
Assets held for saleAssets held for sale— 1,591 
Total current assets150,355
 117,164
Total current assets169,563 139,086 
Property, plant and equipment, net178,148
 176,066
Property, plant and equipment, net141,614 150,091 
Goodwill21,861
 10,996
Intangible assets, net51,036
 18,618
Intangible assets, net16,456 18,252 
Right-of-use operating lease assetsRight-of-use operating lease assets28,011 26,254 
Other assets7,263
 6,837
Other assets3,145 4,323 
Deferred income taxes45,593
 63,055
Total assets$454,256
 $392,736
Total assets$358,789 $338,006 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:   Current liabilities:
Accounts payable51,218
 39,784
Accounts payable63,059 45,703 
Accrued payroll expenses17,286
 17,345
Accrued payroll expenses13,662 15,345 
Short-term borrowings under revolving credit facility84,430
 27,621
Short-term obligations under capital leases488
 958
Operating lease liabilities - currentOperating lease liabilities - current7,311 6,262 
Term loan - currentTerm loan - current3,800 950 
Short-term derivative liabilities1,649
 1,857
Short-term derivative liabilities1,691 1,555 
Other current liabilities10,991
 9,702
Other current liabilities7,834 6,425 
Total current liabilities166,062
 97,267
Total current liabilities97,357 76,240 
Long-term borrowings under revolving credit facilityLong-term borrowings under revolving credit facility54,500 43,500 
Term loan - noncurrentTerm loan - noncurrent40,894 44,328 
Accrued pension liabilities50,505
 51,281
Accrued pension liabilities37,947 39,229 
Accrued postretirement benefits19,112
 19,788
Accrued postretirement benefits1,007 960 
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities6,365
 7,548
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities3,381 3,649 
Other long-term liabilities-capital leases116
 237
Operating lease liabilities - noncurrentOperating lease liabilities - noncurrent21,175 20,049 
Other long-term liabilities2,156
 1,480
Other long-term liabilities1,822 5,092 
Total liabilities$244,316
 $177,601
Total liabilities$258,083 $233,047 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
 
Commitments and contingenciesCommitments and contingencies00
Stockholders’ equity:   Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized; Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, 21,000 shares authorized; 14,700 and zero shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively; liquidation preference of $38.32 at December 31, 201715
 
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 16,899,667 and 16,846,002 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively16,900
 16,846
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized; Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, 21,000 shares authorized; 14,700 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021; liquidation preference of $17,196 and $16,752 as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectivelyPreferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500,000 shares authorized; Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, 21,000 shares authorized; 14,700 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021; liquidation preference of $17,196 and $16,752 as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively15 15 
Common stock, $1.00 par value, 50,000,000 and 25,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively; 18,300,855 and 17,852,793 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectivelyCommon stock, $1.00 par value, 50,000,000 and 25,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively; 18,300,855 and 17,852,793 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively18,302 17,853 
Additional paid-in capital53,322
 41,495
Additional paid-in capital70,187 66,109 
Retained earnings203,289
 221,182
Retained earnings53,983 66,311 
Unearned ESOP shares(2,145) (4,289)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(61,441) (60,099)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(41,781)(45,329)
Total stockholders’ equity$209,940
 $215,135
Total stockholders’ equity$100,706 $104,959 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$454,256
 $392,736
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$358,789 $338,006 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1



FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
 Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net sales$167,366
 $139,025
 $299,079
 $269,513
Cost of goods sold101,847
 83,929
 184,553
 163,219
Gross profit65,519
 55,096
 114,526
 106,294
Selling expenses49,328
 39,097
 88,243
 77,535
General and administrative expenses13,914
 13,793
 25,241
 22,729
Restructuring and other transition expenses139
 3,965
 259
 6,995
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility
 (37,449) 
 (37,449)
Net gains from sale of spice assets(395) (334) (545) (492)
Net losses (gains) from sales of other assets91
 114
 144
 (1,439)
Operating expenses63,077
 19,186
 113,342
 67,879
Income from operations2,442
 35,910
 1,184
 38,415
Other (expense) income:       
Dividend income6
 270
 11
 535
Interest income1
 159
 2
 288
Interest expense(861) (524) (1,384) (913)
Other, net554
 (2,323) 641
 (2,132)
Total other expense(300) (2,418) (730) (2,222)
Income before taxes2,142
 33,492
 454
 36,193
Income tax expense20,910
 13,416
 20,200
 14,499
Net (loss) income$(18,768) $20,076
 $(19,746) $21,694
Less: Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid129
 
 129
 
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders$(18,897) $20,076
 $(19,875) $21,694
Net (loss) income per common share available to common stockholders—basic$(1.13) $1.21
 $(1.19) $1.31
Net (loss) income per common share available to common stockholders—diluted$(1.13) $1.20
 $(1.19) $1.30
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic16,723,498
 16,584,106
 16,711,660
 16,573,545
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted16,723,498
 16,707,003
 16,711,660
 16,695,687
 Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
 2022202120222021
Net sales$119,398 $93,152 $346,205 $294,993 
Cost of goods sold83,838 69,274 244,197 222,447 
Gross profit35,560 23,878 102,008 72,546 
Selling expenses27,477 22,767 81,505 71,035 
General and administrative expenses11,595 11,018 34,796 32,334 
Net losses (gains) from sales of assets426 488 (4,003)(62)
Impairment of fixed assets— — — 1,243 
Operating expenses39,498 34,273 112,298 104,550 
Loss from operations(3,938)(10,395)(10,290)(32,004)
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense(1,591)(2,993)(7,106)(9,174)
Other, net1,579 (356)5,790 17,283 
Total other (expense) income(12)(3,349)(1,316)8,109 
Loss before taxes(3,950)(13,744)(11,606)(23,895)
Income tax expense (benefit)90 (60)278 13,785 
Net loss$(4,040)$(13,684)$(11,884)$(37,680)
Less: Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid149 144 444 428 
Net loss available to common stockholders$(4,189)$(13,828)$(12,328)$(38,108)
Net loss available to common stockholders per common share—basic$(0.23)$(0.78)$(0.68)$(2.17)
Net loss available to common stockholders per common share—diluted$(0.23)$(0.78)$(0.68)$(2.17)
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic18,289,815 17,756,619 18,118,469 17,569,026 
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted18,289,815 17,756,619 18,118,469 17,569,026 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.




2


FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOMELOSS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
2022202120222021
Net loss$(4,040)$(13,684)$(11,884)$(37,680)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges383 (1,315)11,374 6,012 
Gains on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold(3,110)(973)(8,742)(1,233)
Losses on derivative instruments undesignated as cash flow hedges reclassified to interest expense, net of tax294 301 916 960 
Change in pension and retiree benefit obligations— — — (1,105)
Total comprehensive loss, net of tax$(6,473)$(15,671)$(8,336)$(33,046)
 
Three Months Ended
 December 31,
 
Six Months Ended
 December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net (loss) income$(18,768) $20,076
 $(19,746) $21,694
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:       
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, net of tax(1,279) (1,800) (1,711) (1,356)
Losses (gains) on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold, net of tax365
 (132) 369
 153
Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax$(19,682) $18,144
 $(21,088) $20,491


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.








3
FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
 Six Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net (loss) income$(19,746) $21,694
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization15,330
 10,086
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts129
 (44)
Interest on sale-leaseback financing obligation
 681
Restructuring and other transition expenses, net of payments(958) 1,082
Deferred income taxes19,375
 13,640
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility
 (37,449)
Net gains from sales of spice assets and other assets(401) (1,931)
ESOP and share-based compensation expense1,844
 2,094
Net losses on derivative instruments and investments1,033
 2,583
Change in operating assets and liabilities:   
Purchases of trading securities
 (2,959)
Proceeds from sales of trading securities375
 1,268
Accounts receivable(8,102) (4,545)
Inventories(7,682) (10,071)
Income tax receivable112
 (27)
Derivative assets (liabilities), net(3,000) 4,329
Prepaid expenses and other assets352
 33
Accounts payable1,264
 18,356
Accrued payroll expenses and other current liabilities1,178
 (5,210)
Accrued postretirement benefits(676) (447)
Other long-term liabilities(1,960) (1,849)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(1,533) $11,314
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired$(39,608) $(11,183)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(14,672) (26,864)
Purchases of assets for construction of New Facility(1,577) (21,783)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment85
 3,332
Net cash used in investing activities$(55,772) $(56,498)
(continued on next page)



FARMER BROS. CO.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
 Six Months Ended December 31,
 2017 2016
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Proceeds from revolving credit facility$69,758
 $34,323
Repayments on revolving credit facility(12,949) (15,900)
Proceeds from sale-leaseback financing obligation
 42,455
Proceeds from New Facility lease financing obligation
 7,662
Repayments of New Facility lease financing obligation
 (35,772)
Payments of capital lease obligations(591) (641)
Payment of financing costs(365) 
Proceeds from stock option exercises625
 405
Net cash provided by financing activities$56,478
 $32,532
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(827) $(12,652)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period6,241
 21,095
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$5,414
 $8,443
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:   
        Net change in derivative assets and liabilities
           included in other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
$(1,342) $(1,203)
    Non-cash additions to property, plant and equipment$557
 $11,253
    Non-cash portion of earnout receivable recognized—spice assets sale$545
 $492
    Non-cash portion of earnout payable recognized—China Mist acquisition$
 $500
    Non-cash receivable from West Coast Coffee—post-closing final working capital adjustment$218
 $
    Non-cash consideration given—Issuance of Series A Preferred Stock$11,756
 $
    Non-cash Multiemployer Plan Holdback payable recognized—Boyd Coffee acquisition$1,056
 $
    Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid$129
 $




FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 
Preferred SharesPreferred Stock AmountCommon
Shares
Common Stock
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at June 30, 202114,700 $15 17,852,793 $17,853 $66,109 $66,311 $(45,329)$104,959 
Net loss— — — — — (2,424)— (2,424)
Net reclassification of gain (loss) on cash flow hedges— — — — — — 4,253 4,253 
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 51,597 52 619 — — 671 
Share-based compensation— — — — 721 — — 721 
Issuance of common stock and Stock option exercises— — 94,407 94 (94)— — — 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (147)— (147)
Balance at September 30, 202114,700 15 17,998,797 17,999 67,355 63,740 (41,076)108,033 
Net loss— — — — — (5,420)— (5,420)
Net reclassification of gain (loss) on cash flow hedges— — — — — — 1,728 1,728 
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 82,437 84 664 — — 748 
Share-based compensation— — — — 858 — — 858 
Issuance of common stock and stock option exercises, net of shares withheld for taxes— — 129,292 129 (618)— — (489)
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (148)— (148)
Balance at December 31, 202114,700 15 18,210,526 18,212 68,259 58,172 (39,348)105,310 
Net loss— — — — — (4,040)— (4,040)
Net reclassification of (loss) gain on cash flow hedges— — — — — — (2,433)(2,433)
ESOP and 401 (k) compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 90,329 90 1,099 — — 1,189 
Share-based compensation— — — — 829 — — 829 
Issuance of common stock and stock option exercises— — — — — — — — 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (149)— (149)
Balance at March 31, 202214,700 $15 18,300,855 $18,302 $70,187 $53,983 $(41,781)$100,706 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.





















4


FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
(In thousands, except share and per share data) 
Preferred SharesPreferred Stock AmountCommon
Shares
Common Stock
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Balance at June 30, 202014,700 $15 17,347,774 $17,348 $62,043 $108,536 $(76,029)$111,913 
Net loss— — — — — (6,270)— (6,270)
Net reclassification of gain (loss) on cash flow hedges— — — — — — 4,271 4,271 
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of taxes— — — — — — (7,289)(7,289)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 76,671 77 323 — — 400 
Share-based compensation— — — — 745 — — 745 
Issuance of common stock and Stock option exercises— — 7,370 (7)— — — 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (142)— (142)
Balance at September 30, 202014,700 15 17,431,815 17,432 63,104 102,124 (79,047)103,628 
Net loss— — — — — (17,725)— (17,725)
Net reclassification of gain (loss) on cash flow hedges— — — — — — 3,455 3,455 
Change in the funded status of retiree benefit obligations, net of taxes— — — — — — 6,184 6,184 
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 108,426 108 287 — — 395 
Share-based compensation— — — — 399 — — 399 
Issuance of common stock and Stock option exercises— — 50,843 51 (51)— — — 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (143)— (143)
Balance at December 31, 202014,700 15 17,591,084 17,591 63,739 84,256 (69,408)96,193 
Net loss— — — — — (13,684)— (13,684)
Net reclassification of (loss) gain on cash flow hedges— — — — — — (1,987)(1,987)
ESOP compensation expense, including reclassifications— — 162,259 162 769 — — 931 
Share-based compensation— — — — 680 — — 680 
Issuance of common stock and stock option exercises— — 17,898 18 (18)— — — 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid— — — — — (144)— (144)
Balance at March 31, 202114,700 $15 17,771,241 $17,771 $65,170 $70,428 $(71,395)$81,989 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5


FARMER BROS. CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
 Nine Months Ended March 31,
20222021
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss$(11,884)$(37,680)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization18,119 21,231 
Impairment of fixed assets— 1,243 
Postretirement Medical benefits gains— (14,577)
Deferred income taxes— 13,472 
Net gains from sales of assets(4,003)(62)
Net gains on derivatives instruments(12,798)(2,875)
Other adjustments4,963 3,124 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable(7,559)4,210 
Inventories(25,610)(7,744)
Derivative assets, net13,223 3,309 
Other assets1,989 3,184 
Accounts payable16,921 6,496 
Accrued expenses and other(2,988)3,181 
Net cash used in operating activities(9,627)(3,488)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment(8,896)(12,796)
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment9,062 2,009 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities166 (10,787)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from Credit Facilities15,000 27,150 
Repayments on Credit Facilities(4,950)(61,150)
Payments of finance lease obligations(144)(57)
Payment of financing costs(330)(3,207)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities9,576 (37,264)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash115 (51,539)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period10,438 60,013 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$10,553 $8,474 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non cash additions to property, plant and equipment$435 $297 
Non-cash issuance of 401-K common stock224 347 
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid444 428 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6



FARMER BROS. CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Note 1. Introduction and Basis of Presentation
Farmer Bros. Co., a Delaware corporation (including its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company”), is a nationalleading coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea, and culinary products.other allied products manufactured under our owned brands, as well as under private labels on behalf of certain customers.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals, unless otherwise indicated) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial data have been included. Operating results for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018.2022. Events occurring subsequent to DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017.2022.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on September 28, 201710, 2021 (the “2017“2021 Form 10-K”).
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries FBC Finance Company, a California corporation, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation and, the parent company of Coffee Bean International, Inc., an Oregon corporation, (“CBI”), CBI, China Mist Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Boyd Assets Co., a Delaware corporation. All inter-companyintercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company reviews its estimates on an ongoing basis using currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from those estimates.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
For a detailed discussion about the Company’s significant accounting policies, see Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements in the 2017Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2021 Form 10-K.
During the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017, other than as set forth below and the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities” (“ASU 2017-12”), ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”), and ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015-11”),2022, there were no significant updates made to the Company’s significant accounting policies.
Coffee Brewing EquipmentConcentration of Credit Risk
At March 31, 2022 and ServiceJune 30, 2021, the financial instruments which potentially expose the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash in financial institutions (in excess of federally insured limits), derivative instruments and trade receivables.
The Company classifies certain expensesdoes not have any credit-risk related contingent features that would require it to coffee brewing equipment provided to customers as costpost additional collateral in support of goods sold. These costs include the costits net derivative asset positions. At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, none of the equipment as well ascash in the costCompany’s coffee-related derivative margin accounts was restricted. Further changes in commodity prices and the number of servicing that equipment (including servicecoffee-related derivative instruments held could have a significant impact on cash deposit requirements under certain of the Company's broker and counterparty agreements.
Approximately 50% and 31% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable balance was with five customers at March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively. The Company estimates its maximum credit risk for accounts receivable at

7

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










the amount recorded on the balance sheet. The trade accounts receivables are generally short-term and all estimated credit losses have been appropriately considered in establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts.
employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and the cost of supplies and parts) and are considered directly attributable to the generation of revenues from its customers. Accordingly, such costs included in cost of goods sold in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $7.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Coffee brewing equipment costs included in cost of goods sold in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $13.5 million and $12.3 million, respectively.Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company capitalizes coffee brewing equipmentconsiders the applicability and depreciates it over five yearsimpact of all Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and reportseither determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal impact on its consolidated financial statements.
The following table provides a brief description of the depreciation expense in cost of goods sold. Such depreciation expense relatedrecent ASUs applicable to capitalized coffee brewing equipment reported in cost of goods sold in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $2.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and $4.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively, in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Company:
StandardDescriptionEffective DateEffect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Facilitation of the Effect of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting” (“ASU 2020-04”)
The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) is being discontinued between December 2021 and June 2023. The Company has not entered into any new contracts after December 31, 2021. With the overnight, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month USD LIBOR rates being published through June 30, 2023, we will continue to leverage these for the existing contracts.
ASU 2020-04 provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by the transition from LIBOR to alternative reference rate.
Issuance date of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.The Company does not anticipate any material impacts on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Leases
The Company capitalized coffee brewing equipment (included in machineryhas entered into leases for building facilities, vehicles and equipment) inother equipment. The Company’s leases have remaining contractual terms through September 30, 2028, some of which have options to extend the amountslease for up to 10 years. For purposes of $4.8 million and $5.9 million incalculating operating lease liabilities, lease terms are deemed not to include options to extend the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share
Net (loss) income per share (“EPS”) represents net (loss) income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period, excluding unallocated shares held by the Company's Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). Dividends on the Company’s outstanding Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock”),lease renewal until it is reasonably certain that the Company has paidwill exercise that option. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or intendsmaterial restrictive covenants.
Supplemental unaudited consolidated balance sheet information related to pay are deducted from net (loss) income in computing net (loss) income available to common stockholders.leases is as follows:
Under the two-class method, net (loss) income available to nonvested restricted stockholders and holders of Series A Preferred Stock is excluded from net (loss) income available to common stockholders for purposes of calculating basic and diluted EPS.
Diluted EPS represents net income available to holders of common stock divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive impact of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares include potentially dilutive shares from share-based compensation including stock options, unvested restricted stock, performance-based restricted stock units, and shares of Series A Preferred Stock, as converted, because they are deemed participating securities. In the absence of contrary information, the Company assumes 100% of the target shares are issuable under performance-based restricted stock units.
The dilutive effect of Series A Preferred Stock is reflected in diluted EPS by application of the if-converted method. In applying the if-converted method, conversion will not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted EPS if the effect would be anti-dilutive. The Series A Preferred Stock is anti-dilutive whenever the amount of the dividend declared or accumulated in the current period per common share obtainable upon conversion exceeds basic EPS. See Note 19.
Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets

Historically, the Company performed its annual assessment of impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of June 30.  During the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Company voluntarily changed its annual impairment assessment date from June 30 to January 31.  The Company believes this change in assessment date, which represents a change in the method of applying an accounting principle, is preferred under the circumstances.  Due to recent acquisitions, the Company’s goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset balances have increased. The Company believes the change in measurement date will provide additional time to complete the annual assessment of impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in advance of year-end reporting.

Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs incurred through outside carriers are recorded as a component of the Company’s selling expenses and were $6.9 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and $12.1 million and $11.2 million, respectively, in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Share-based Compensation
(In thousands)ClassificationMarch 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Operating lease assetsRight-of-use operating lease assets$28,011 $26,254 
Finance lease assetsProperty, plant and equipment, net615 739 
Total lease assets$28,626 $26,993 
 
Operating lease liabilities - currentOperating lease liabilities - current7,311 6,262 
Finance lease liabilities - currentOther current liabilities193 192 
Operating lease liabilities - noncurrentOperating lease liabilities - noncurrent21,175 20,049 
Finance lease liabilities -noncurrentOther long-term liabilities446 563 
Total lease liabilities$29,125 $27,066 
The Company measures all share-based compensation cost at the grant date, based on the fair valuescomponents of the awards thatlease expense are ultimately expected to vest, and recognizes that cost as an expense on a straight line-basis in its consolidated statements of operations over the requisite service period. Fair value of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units isfollows:
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)Classification2022202120222021
Operating lease expenseGeneral and administrative expenses and cost of goods sold$1,887 $1,838 $5,557 $5,415 
Finance lease expense:
Amortization of finance lease assetsGeneral and administrative expenses41 54 123 63 
Interest on finance lease liabilitiesInterest expense11 13 34 13 
Total lease expense$1,939 $1,905 $5,714 $5,491 

8

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:
the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company estimates the fair value of option awards using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which requires management to make certain assumptions for estimating the fair value of stock options at the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the Company’s stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates, in management’s opinion, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of the Company’s stock options. Although the fair value of stock options is determined using an option valuation model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
March 31, 2022
(In thousands)Operating LeasesFinance Leases
2022$1,839 $47 
20237,264 193 
20246,985 193 
20255,727 193 
20264,525 96 
Thereafter6,707 — 
Total lease payments33,047 722 
Less: interest(4,561)(83)
Total lease obligations$28,486 $639 
In addition, the Company estimates the expected impact of forfeited awards and recognizes share-based compensation cost only for those awards ultimately expected to vest. If actual forfeiture rates differ materially from the Company’s estimates, share-based compensation expense could differ significantly from the amounts the Company has recorded in the current period. The Company periodically reviews actual forfeiture experience and will revise its estimates, as necessary. The Company will recognize as compensation cost the cumulative effect of the change in estimated forfeiture rates on current and prior periods in earnings of the period of revision. As a result, if the Company revises its assumptions and estimates, the Company’s share-based compensation expense could change materially in the future.
The Company’s outstanding share-based awards include performance-based non-qualified stock options (“PNQs”) and performance-based restricted stock units (“PBRSUs”) that have performance-based vesting conditions in addition to time-based vesting. Awards with performance-based vesting conditions require the achievement of certain financial and other performance criteria as a condition to the vesting. The Company recognizes the estimated fair value of performance-based awards, net of estimated forfeitures, as share-based compensation expense over the service period based upon the Company’s determination of whether it is probable that the performance targets will be achieved. At each reporting period, the Company reassesses the probability of achieving the performance criteria and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance criteria will be achieved involves judgment, and the estimate of share-based compensation expense may be revised periodically based on changes in the probability of achieving the performance criteria. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If performance goals are not met, no share-based compensation expense is recognized for the cancelled PNQs or PBRSUs, and, to the extent share-based compensation expense was previously recognized for those cancelled PNQs or PBRSUs, such share-based compensation expense is reversed. If performance goals are exceeded and the payout is more than 100% of the target shares, additional compensation expense is recorded in the period when that determination is certified by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. See Note 16.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2017-12. ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting model in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements and enhance the transparency and understandability of hedge results. ASU 2017-12 expands an entity’s ability to hedge non-financial and financial risk components and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. The guidance eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The guidance also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The guidance in ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal year before the effective date. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, entities will apply the new guidance using a modified retrospective approach (i.e., with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the initial application date). The guidance provides transition relief to make it easier for entities to apply certain amendments to existing hedges (including fair value hedges) where the hedge documentation needs to be modified. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-12 as of September 30, 2017 for its cash flow hedges related to coffee commodity purchases. Adoption of ASU 2017-12 resulted in a cumulative adjustment of $0.3 million to the opening balance of retained earnings. Adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have any other material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09. ASU 2016-09 was issued as part of the FASB’s Simplification Initiative. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 requires that the tax impact related to the difference between share-based compensation for book and tax purposes be recognized as income tax benefit or expense in the reporting period in which such awards vest. ASU 2016-09 also required a modified retrospective adoption for previously unrecognized excess tax benefits. The guidance in ASU 2016-09 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after  December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 beginning July 1, 2017 on a modified retrospective basis, recognizing all excess tax benefits previously unrecognized, as a cumulative-effect adjustment increasing deferred tax assets by $1.6 million and increasing retained earnings by the same amount as of July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have any other material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11. ASU 2015-11 simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Entities will continue to apply their existing impairment models to inventories that are accounted for using last-in first-out or LIFO and the retail inventory method or RIM. Under current guidance, net realizable value is one of several calculations an entity needs to make to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market. ASU 2015-11 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the guidance must be applied prospectively after the date of adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2015-11 beginning July 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2015-11 did not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost” (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 amends the requirements in GAAP related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. ASU 2017-07 changes the income statement presentation of defined benefit plan expense by requiring separation between operating expense (service cost component) and non-operating expense (all other components, including interest cost, amortization of prior service cost, curtailments and settlements, etc.). The operating expense component is reported with similar compensation costs while the non-operating expense components are reported in other income and expense. In addition, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization as part of an asset such as inventory or property, plant and equipment. The guidance in ASU 2017-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Because the expected operating expense component and non-operating expense components of net periodic benefit cost are not material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, adoption of ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). The amendments in ASU 2017-04 address concerns regarding the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, and remove the second step of the test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 does not amend the optional qualitative assessment of goodwill impairment. The guidance in ASU 2017-04 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2020. Adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business” (“ASU 2017-01”). The amendments in ASU 2017-01 clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses and provide a screen to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace the missing elements. The guidance in ASU 2017-01 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2017-01 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). The amendments require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The guidance in ASU 2016-18 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 addresses certain issues where diversity in practice was identified in classifying certain cash receipts and cash payments based on the guidance in ASC 230. ASC 230 is principles based and often requires judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flows as operating, investing or financing activities. The application of judgment has resulted in diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are classified. Certain cash receipts and cash payments may have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 clarifies that an entity will first apply any relevant guidance in ASC 230 and in other applicable topics. If there is no guidance that addresses those cash receipts and cash payments, an entity will determine each separately identifiable source or use and classify the receipt or payment based on the nature of the cash flow. If a receipt or payment has aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated, classification will depend on the predominant source or use. The guidance in ASU 2016-15 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in certain circumstances. ASU 2016-15 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”), which introduces a new lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the balance sheet. Under the new guidance, lessees are required to recognize a lease liability, which represents the discounted obligation to make future minimum lease payments and a related right-of-use asset. For public business entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early application is permitted. ASU 2016-02 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements and expects the adoption will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position resulting from the increase in assets and liabilities.
In May 2014, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers under ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year allowing early adoption as of the original effective date of January 1, 2017. The deferral results in the new accounting standard being effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2018. The Company is in the process of evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-09 and assessing its impact on the Company’s financial statements, information systems, business processes, and financial statement disclosures. The Company has analyzed its revenue streams and is in the process of performing detailed contract reviews for each stream, and evaluating the impact ASU 2014-09 may have on revenue recognition. The Company primarily recognizes revenue at point of sale or delivery and does not expect that this will change under the new standard. Based on its preliminary reviews, the Company does not expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements; however, the Company’s assessment of contracts related to recent acquisitions is still in process. At a minimum, the Company anticipates expanded disclosures related to revenue in order to comply with ASU 2014-09. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. Preliminary assessments made by the Company are subject to change. The Company has not yet concluded which transition method it will elect but will determine the transition method in the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Note 3. Acquisitions
China Mist Brands, Inc.
On October 11, 2016, the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas. As part of the transaction, the Company assumed the lease on China Mist’s existing 17,400 square foot distribution and warehouse facility in Scottsdale, Arizona which is terminable upon twelve months’ notice.
The Company acquired China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of $12.2 million, consisting of $11.2 million in cash paid at closing including estimated working capital adjustments of $0.4 million, post-closing final working capital adjustments of $0.6 million, and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. This contingent earnout liability is estimated to have a fair value of $0.5 million as of the closing date and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid in calendar 2019.
The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final.
The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands)Fair Value 
Estimated
Useful Life
(years)
    
Cash paid, net of cash acquired$11,183
  
Post-closing final working capital adjustments553
  
Contingent consideration500
  
Total consideration$12,236
  
    
Accounts receivable$811
  
Inventory544
  
Prepaid assets48
  
Property, plant and equipment189
  
Goodwill2,927
  
Intangible assets:   
  Recipes930
 7
  Non-compete agreement100
 5
  Customer relationships2,000
 10
  Trade name/Trademark—indefinite-lived5,070
  
Accounts payable(383)  
  Total consideration, net of cash acquired$12,236
  

In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $2.9 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $3.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included recipes, a non-compete agreement and customer relationships and $5.1 million in indefinite-lived trade name/trademark. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 8.9 years. See Note 13.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.
The fair value assigned to the recipes was determined utilizing the replacement cost method, which captures the direct cost of the development effort plus lost profits over the time to re-create the recipes.
The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreement in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreement in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of China Mist’s non-compete agreement.
The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management’s estimate of the retention rate utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships.
The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.
West Coast Coffee Company, Inc.
On February 7, 2017, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. (“West Coast Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on the convenience store, grocery and foodservice channels. As part of the transaction, the Company entered into a three-year lease on West Coast Coffee’s existing 20,400 square foot production, distribution and warehouse facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, which expires January 31, 2020, and assumed leases on six branch warehouses consisting of an aggregate of 24,150 square feet in Oregon, California and Nevada, expiring on various dates through November 2020. The Company acquired West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.5 million, which included $14.7 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million, post-closing final working capital adjustments of $(0.2) million, and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. This contingent earnout liability is estimated to have a fair value of $0.6 million as of the closing date and is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017. The earnout is estimated to be paid within twenty-four months following the closing.
The financial effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.
The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is final.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


The following table summarizes the final allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands)Fair Value Estimated Useful Life (years)
    
Cash paid, net of cash acquired$14,671
  
Post-closing final working capital adjustments(218)  
Fair value of contingent consideration600
  
Total consideration$15,053
  
    
Accounts receivable$956
  
Inventory910
  
Prepaid assets16
  
Property, plant and equipment1,546
  
Goodwill7,630
  
Intangible assets:   
  Non-compete agreements100
 5
  Customer relationships4,400
 10
  Trade name—finite-lived260
 7
  Brand name—finite-lived250
 1.7
Accounts payable(833)  
Other liabilities(182)  
  Total consideration, net of cash acquired$15,053
  

In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $7.6 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $5.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included non-compete agreements, customer relationships, a trade name and a brand name. The weighted average amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 9.3 years. See Note 13.
The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.
The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreements was determined utilizing the with and without method. Under the with and without method, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated based on the difference in projected earnings with the agreements in place versus projected earnings based on starting with no agreements in place. Revenue and earnings projections were significant inputs into estimating the value of West Coast Coffee’s non-compete agreements.
The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.
The fair values assigned to the trade name and the brand name were determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. The relief from royalty method is based on the premise that the intangible asset owner would be willing to pay a royalty rate to license the subject asset. The analysis involves forecasting revenue over the life of the asset, applying a royalty rate and a tax rate, and then discounting the savings back to present value at an appropriate discount rate.

Boyd Coffee Company
On October 2, 2017 (“Closing Date”), the Company, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of Boyd Coffee Company (“Boyd Coffee” or “Seller”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on restaurants, hotels, and convenience stores on the West Coast of the United States. The acquired business of Boyd Coffee (the “Boyd Business”) is expected to add to the Company’s product portfolio, improve growth potential, increase the density and penetration of the Company’s distribution footprint, and increase capacity utilization at

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


the Company’s production facilities.

At closing, as consideration for the purchase, the Company paid the Seller $38.9 million in cash from borrowings under its senior secured revolving credit facility (see Note 15), and issued to Boyd Coffee 14,700 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, with a fair value of $11.8 million as of the Closing Date. Additionally, the Company held back $3.2 million in cash (“Holdback Cash Amount”) and 6,300 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Holdback Stock”) with a fair value of $4.8 million as of the Closing Date, for the satisfaction of any post-closing working capital adjustment and to secure the Seller’s (and the other seller parties’) indemnification obligations under the purchase agreement. Any Holdback Cash Amount and Holdback Stock not used to satisfy indemnification claims (including pending claims) will be released to the Seller on the 18-month anniversary of the Closing Date.

In addition to the Holdback Cash, as part of the consideration for the purchase, at closing the Company held back $1.1 million in cash (the “Multiemployer Plan Holdback”) to pay, on behalf of the Seller, any assessment of withdrawal liability made against the Seller following the Closing Date in respect of the Seller’s multiemployer plans. As the Company has not made this payment as of December 31, 2017 and expects settling the pension liability will take greater than twelve months, the Multiemployer Plan Holdback is recorded in other long-term liabilities on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017. See Note 17.

The parties are in the process of determining the final net working capital under the purchase agreement. At December 31, 2017, the Company estimated a net working capital adjustment of $(8.1) million, which is reflected in the preliminary purchase price allocation set forth below.  

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of consideration transferred as of the acquisition date:
(In thousands)Fair Value 
Estimated
Useful Life
(years)
    
Cash paid$38,871

 
Holdback Cash Amount3,150
  
Multiemployer Plan Holdback1,056
  
Fair value of Series A Preferred Stock (14,700 shares)(1)11,756
  
Fair value of Holdback Stock (6,300 shares)(1)4,825
  
Preliminary estimated post-closing working capital adjustment(8,059)  
Total consideration$51,599
  
    
Accounts receivable$7,166
  
Inventory9,415
  
Prepaid expense and other assets1,951
  
Property, plant and equipment4,936
  
Goodwill11,032
  
Intangible assets:   
  Customer relationships31,000
 10
  Trade name/trademark—indefinite-lived2,800
  
Accounts payable(15,080)  
Other liabilities(1,621)  
  Total consideration$51,599
  
______________
(1) Fair value of Series A Preferred Stock and Holdback Stock as of the Closing Date, estimated as the sum of (a) the present value of the dividends payable thereon and (b) the stated value of the Series A Preferred Stock or Holdback Stock, as the case may be, adjusted for both the conversion premium and the discount for lack of marketability arising from conversion restrictions.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. The fair value of consideration transferred was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated amount recorded as goodwill. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as the Company is in the process of finalizing the valuation inputs including growth assumptions, cost projectionsLease term and discount rates which are used in the fair value calculation of certain assets as well as the determination of the final post-closing net working capital adjustment. The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change and such change could be material based on numerous factors, including the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the amount of the final post-closing net working capital adjustment.rate:

March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Weighted-average remaining lease terms (in years):
Operating lease6.57.3
Finance lease3.84.5
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating lease5.69 %5.23 %
Finance lease6.50 %6.50 %
In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $11.0 million, which is deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recorded $31.0 million in finite-lived intangible assets that included customer relationships and $2.8 million in indefinite-lived intangible assets that included a trade name/trademark. The amortization period for the finite-lived intangible assets is 10.0 years. See Note 13.Other Information:

Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)20222021
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$5,138 $5,807 
Operating cash flows from finance leases34 13 
Financing cash flows from finance leases144 44 
The determination of the fair value of intangible assets acquired was primarily based on significant inputs not observable in an active market and thus represent Level 3 fair value measurements as defined under GAAP.

The fair value assigned to the customer relationships was determined based on management's estimate of the retention rate utilizing certain benchmarks. Revenue and earnings projections were also significant inputs into estimating the value of customer relationships.

The fair value assigned to the trade name/trademark was determined utilizing a multi-period excess earnings approach. Under the multi-period excess earnings approach, the fair value of the intangible asset is estimated to be the present value of future earnings attributable to the asset and this method utilizes revenue and cost projections including an assumed contributory asset charge.

The following table presents the net sales and income before taxes from the Boyd Business operations that are included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 (unaudited):
 Closing Date through December 31, 2017
(In thousands) 
Net sales$26,290
Income before taxes$511

The Company has not presented pro forma results of operations for the acquisition because it is not significant to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. However, the Company considers the acquisition to be material to the Company’s financial statements and has provided certain pro forma disclosures pursuant to ASC 805, “Business Combinations.”

The following table sets forth certain unaudited pro forma financial results for the Company for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, as if the acquisition of the Boyd Business was consummated on the same terms as of the first day of the applicable fiscal period.
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands)        
Net sales $167,366
 $166,107
 $321,061
 $319,411
Income before taxes $2,142
 $34,171
 $779
 $36,414

At closing, the parties entered into a transition services agreement where the Seller agreed to provide certain accounting, marketing, sales and distribution support during a transition period of up to 12 months. The Company also entered into a co-manufacturing agreement with the Seller for a transition period of up to 12 months as the Company

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


transitions production into its plants. Amounts paid by the Company to the Seller for these services totaled $9.2 million in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017.

The Company incurred transaction costs related to the Boyd Business acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and consulting expenses of $1.0 million and $3.4 million during the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Note 4. Restructuring Plans
Corporate Relocation Plan
On February 5, 2015, the Company announced a plan (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”) to close its Torrance, California facility (the “Torrance Facility”) and relocate its corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California to a new facility in Northlake, Texas (“New Facility”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a result of the Torrance Facility closure. The Company’s decision resulted from a comprehensive review of alternatives designed to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities.
In the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, no expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan were incurred. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $0.1 million in unpaid expenses related to employee-related costs, which is expected to be paid by the end of fiscal 2018.
The Company estimated that it would incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan through December 31, 2017, the Company has recognized a total of $31.5 million in aggregate cash costs including $17.1 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $7.0 million in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company’s headquarters, relocation of the Company’s Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and $7.4 million in other related costs. The Company also recognized from inception through December 31, 2017 non-cash depreciation expense of $2.3 million associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. The Company may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan.


Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”) Restructuring Plan
On February 21, 2017, the Company announced a restructuring plan to reorganize its DSD operations in an effort to realign functions into a channel-based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results (the “DSD Restructuring Plan”). The strategic decision to undertake the DSD Restructuring Plan resulted from an ongoing operational review of various initiatives within the DSD selling organization. The Company has revised its estimated time of completion of the DSD Restructuring Plan from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 to the end of fiscal 2018.
The Company estimates that it will recognize approximately $3.7 million to $4.9 million of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately $1.9 million to $2.7 million in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and $1.8 million to $2.2 million in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. The Company may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or associated with, the DSD Restructuring Plan.
Expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 consisted of $0 and $24,000, respectively, in employee-related costs and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in other related costs. Since the adoption of the DSD Restructuring Plan through December 31, 2017, the Company has recognized and paid a total of $2.7 million in aggregate cash costs including $1.1 million in employee-related costs, and $1.6 million in other related

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


costs. The remaining estimated costs of $1.0 million to $2.2 million are expected to be incurred in the remainder of fiscal 2018.
Note 5. New Facility
Lease Agreement and Purchase Option Exercise
On June 15, 2016, the Company exercised the purchase option to purchase the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement dated as of July 17, 2015, as amended (the “Lease Agreement”). On September 15, 2016 (“Purchase Option Closing Date”), the Company closed the purchase option and acquired the land and the partially constructed New Facility located thereon for an aggregate purchase price of $42.5 million (the “Purchase Price”), consisting of the purchase option price of $42.0 million based on actual construction costs incurred as of the Purchase Option Closing Date plus the option exercise fee, plus amounts paid in respect of real estate commissions, title insurance, and recording fees. Upon closing of the purchase option, the Company recorded the aggregate purchase price of the New Facility in “Property, plant and equipment, net” on its consolidated balance sheet. The asset related to the New Facility lease obligation included in “Property, plant and equipment, net,” the offsetting liability for the lease obligation included in “Other long-term liabilities” and the rent expense related to the land were reversed. Concurrent with the purchase option closing, on September 15, 2016, the Company terminated the Lease Agreement. The Company did not pay any early termination penalties in connection with the termination of the Lease Agreement.
Development Management Agreement
In conjunction with the Lease Agreement, the Company also entered into a Development Management Agreement with an affiliate of Stream Realty Partners (the “DMA”) to manage, coordinate, represent, assist and advise the Company on matters from the pre-development through construction of the New Facility. Services under the DMA have concluded. The Company incurred and paid $4.0 million under this agreement which is included in “Buildings and Facilities” (see Note 12).
Amended Building Contract
On September 17, 2016, the Company and The Haskell Company (“Builder”) entered into a Change Order, which, among other things, amended the building contract previously entered into between the Company and Builder to provide a guaranteed maximum price and the basis for the price and the scope of Builder’s services in connection with the construction of the New Facility (the “Amended Building Contract”).
Pursuant to the Amended Building Contract, Builder provided pre-construction and construction services, including specialized industrial design and construction work in connection with Builder’s construction of certain production equipment installed in portions of the New Facility (the “Project”). In April 2017, the Company and Builder entered into a change order to change the scope of work which added $0.6 million to the Amended Building Contract. Builder's work on the Project has been completed. The Company incurred and paid $22.5 million for Builder’s services in connection with the Project which amount is included in “Machinery and equipment” (see Note 12).
New Facility Costs
The Company estimated that the total construction costs including the cost of land for the New Facility would be approximately $60 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company has incurred an aggregate of $60.8 million in construction costs. In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, the Company estimated that it would incur approximately $35 million to $39 million for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures in connection with construction of the New Facility of which the Company has incurred an aggregate of $33.2 million as of December 31, 2017, including $22.5 million under the Amended Building Contract. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures in connection with the initial construction of the New Facility were incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. The Company commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. The Company began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
At December 31, 2017, the Company had committed to purchase additional equipment for the New Facility totaling $6.3 million.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



Note 6. Sales of Assets
Sale of Torrance Facility
On July 15, 2016, the Company completed the sale of the Torrance Facility, consisting of approximately 665,000 square feet of buildings located on approximately 20.3 acres of land, for an aggregate cash sale price of $43.0 million, which sale price was subject to customary adjustments for closing costs and documentary transfer taxes. Cash proceeds from the sale of the Torrance Facility were $42.5 million.
Following the closing of the sale, the Company leased back the Torrance Facility on a triple net basis through October 31, 2016 at zero base rent, and exercised two one-month extensions at a base rent of $100,000 per month. In accordance with ASC 840, “Leases,” due to the Company’s continuing involvement with the property, the Company accounted for the transaction as a financing transaction, deferred the gain on sale of the Torrance Facility and recorded the net sale proceeds of $42.5 million and accrued non-cash interest expense on the financing transaction in “Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2016. The Company vacated the Torrance Facility in December 2016 and concluded the leaseback transaction. As a result, at December 31, 2016, the financing transaction qualified for sales recognition under ASC 840. Accordingly, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized the net gain from sale of the Torrance Facility in the amount of $37.4 million, including non-cash interest expense of $0.7 million and non-cash rent expense of $1.4 million, representing the rent for the zero base rent period previously recorded in “Other current liabilities” and removed the amounts recorded in “Assets held for sale” and the “Sale-leaseback financing obligation” on its consolidated balance sheet.
Sale of Northern California Branch Property
On September 30, 2016, the Company completed the sale of its branch property in Northern California for a sale price of $2.2 million and leased it back through March 31, 2017, at a base rent of $10,000 per month. The Company recognized a net gain on sale of the Northern California property in the six months ended December 31, 2016 in the amount of $2.0 million.

Note 7.4. Derivative Instruments
Derivative Instruments Held
Coffee-Related Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to commodity price risk associated with its price to be fixed green coffee purchase contracts, which are described further in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” in the Notes to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in the 20172021 Form 10-K. The Company utilizes forward and option contracts to manage exposure to the variability in expected future cash flows from forecasted purchases of green coffee attributable to commodity price risk. Certain of these coffee-related derivative instruments utilized for risk management purposes have been designated as cash flow hedges, while other coffee-related derivative instruments have not been designated as cash flow hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting despite hedging the Company’s future cash flows on an economic basis.
The following table summarizes the notional volumes for the coffee-related derivative instruments held by the Company at DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and June 30, 2017:2021:
(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
  Long coffee pounds10,838 14,625 
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:
  Long coffee pounds2,735 6,886 
      Total13,573 21,511 
9

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








(In thousands) December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:    
  Long coffee pounds 31,763
 33,038
Derivative instruments not designated as cash flow hedges:    
  Long coffee pounds 1,612
 2,121
      Total 33,375
 35,159

Coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges outstanding as of DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 will expire within 1912 months. At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021 approximately 80% and 68%, respectively, of the Company's outstanding coffee-related derivative instruments were designated as cash flow hedges.

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Instruments
Farmer Bros. Co.Pursuant to an International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) Master Agreement which was effective March 20, 2019, the Company on March 27, 2019, entered into an interest rate swap transaction utilizing a notional amount of $80.0 million, with an effective date of April 11, 2019 and a maturity date of October 11, 2023 (the “Rate Swap”). In December 2019, the Company amended the notional amount to $65.0 million. The Rate Swap is intended to manage the Company’s interest rate risk on its floating-rate indebtedness under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Under the terms of the Rate Swap, the Company receives 1-month LIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, and makes payments based on a fixed rate of 2.1975%.
NotesThe Company had designated the Rate Swap derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge; however, during the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company de-designated the Rate Swap derivative instrument. As a result, the balance in accumulated other comprehensive income, or “AOCI” was frozen at the time of de-designation. The Company recognized $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, out of AOCI and into interest expense for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2022. The remaining balance of $1.7 million frozen in AOCI will be amortized over the life of the Rate Swap through October 11, 2023.
In connection with a new revolver credit facility agreement in April 2021 (see Note 11 for details), the Company also executed a new ISDA agreement (the “Amended Rate Swap”) to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)transfer its interest swap to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”). Under the terms of the Amended Rate Swap, the Company receives 1-month LIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, and makes payments based on a fixed rate of 2.4725%, an increase of 0.275% from its original Rate Swap fixed rate of 2.1975%. The Amended Rate Swap utilizes the same notional amount of $65.0 million and maturity date of October 11, 2023 as the original interest rate swap.



The Company did not designate the Amended Rate Swap as a cash flow hedge. The Company’s obligations under the Amended Rate Swap are secured by the collateral which secures the loans under the new Revolver Credit Facility (see Note 11 for details) on a pari passu and pro rata basis with the principal of such loans.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Financial Statements
Balance Sheets
Fair values of derivative instruments on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
consolidated balance sheets:
 
Derivative Instruments
Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
 Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017Derivative Instruments
Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Derivative Instruments Not Designated as Accounting Hedges
(In thousands)        (In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Financial Statement Location:        Financial Statement Location:
Short-term derivative assets(1):        
Short-term derivative assets:Short-term derivative assets:
Coffee-related derivative instruments $233
 $66
 $40
 $
Coffee-related derivative instruments$5,561 $3,823 $526 $528 
Long-term derivative assets(2):        
Long-term derivative assets:Long-term derivative assets:
Coffee-related derivative instruments (1) Coffee-related derivative instruments (1)— 292 — — 
Interest rate swap derivative instruments (1)Interest rate swap derivative instruments (1)— — 162 — 
Short-term derivative liabilities:Short-term derivative liabilities:
Coffee-related derivative instruments $99
 $66
 $
 $
Coffee-related derivative instruments24 20 1,123 
Short-term derivative liabilities(1):        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $1,665
 $1,733
 $258
 $190
Long-term derivative liabilities(2):        
Coffee-related derivative instruments $
 $446
 $
 $
Interest rate swap derivative instrumentsInterest rate swap derivative instruments— — 544 1,532 
Long-term derivative liabilities:Long-term derivative liabilities:
Coffee-related derivative instruments (2)Coffee-related derivative instruments (2)— — — — 
Interest rate swap derivative instruments (2)Interest rate swap derivative instruments (2)— — — 1,653 
________________
(1) Included in “Short-term derivative liabilities”“Other assets” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.Company's consolidated balance sheets.
(2) Included in "Other assets" and “Other long-term liabilities” on the Company’s CondensedCompany's consolidated balance sheets.
10

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively.Financial Statements (continued)








Statements of Operations
The following table presents pretax net gains and losses for the Company’s coffee-relatedCompany's derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, as recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) “AOCI,” “Cost of goods sold” and “Other, net”:
.
  
Three Months Ended
December 31,
 
Six Months Ended
December 31,
 Financial Statement Classification
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016 
Net losses recognized in AOCI $(2,094) $(2,943) $(2,459) $(2,217) AOCI
Net (losses) gains recognized in earnings $(597) $215
 $(604) $(250) Costs of goods sold
Net (losses) gains recognized in earnings (ineffective portion)(1) $
 $(41) $48
 $(28) Other, net
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,Financial Statement Classification
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Net losses recognized in AOCI - Interest rate swap$— $— $— $(304)AOCI
Net (losses) gains recognized from AOCI to earnings - Interest rate swap(1)(6)(354)Interest Expense
Net losses reclassified from AOCI to earnings for de-designated Interest rate swap(293)(320)(910)(960)Interest Expense
Net gains (losses) recognized in AOCI - Coffee-related383 (1,315)11,374 6,051 AOCI
Net gains recognized in earnings - Coffee - related3,110 983 8,742 1,587 Cost of goods sold
________________
(1) Amount included in six months ended December 31, 2017 relates to trades terminated prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-12. See Note 2.

For the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, there were no gains gains or losses recognized in earnings as a result of excluding amounts from the assessment of hedge effectiveness or as a result of reclassifications to earnings following the discontinuance of any cash flow hedges.effectiveness.
Net (gains) losses on derivative instruments and investments in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Cash Flowscash flows also include net (gains) losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges reclassified to cost of goods sold from AOCI in the sixthree and nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. Gains and losses on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges are included in “Other, net” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Operationsoperations and in “NetNet (gains) losses on derivative instruments and investments” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Cash Flows.cash flows.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Net gains and losses recorded in “Other, net” are as follows:
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments $(190) $(1,204) $(93) $(1,240)
Net gains (losses) on investments 16
 (1,320) 7
 (1,092)
     Net losses on derivative instruments and investments(1) (174) (2,524) (86) (2,332)
     Other gains, net 728
 201
 727
 200
             Other, net $554
 $(2,323) $641
 $(2,132)
 Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Net gains (losses) on coffee-related derivative instruments (1)$665 $(832)$3,087 $1,002 
Non-operating pension and other postretirement benefits896 455 2,685 15,943 
Other gains (losses), net18 21 18 338 
             Other, net$1,579 $(356)$5,790 $17,283 
___________
(1) Excludes net gains and losses on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges recorded in cost of goods sold in the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


Offsetting of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
The Company has agreements in place that allow for the financial right of offset for derivative assets and liabilities at settlement or in the event of default under the agreements. Additionally, under certain coffee derivative agreements, the Company maintains accounts with its brokerscounterparties to facilitate financial derivative transactions in support of its risk management activities. Based on the value of the Company’s positions in these accounts and the associated margin requirements, the Company may be required to deposit cash into these broker accounts.
The following table presents the Company’s net exposure from its offsetting derivative asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral on deposit with its counterparties as of the reporting dates indicated:
(In thousands)   Gross Amount Reported on Balance Sheet Netting Adjustments Cash Collateral Posted Net Exposure
December 31, 2017 Derivative Assets $372
 $(372) $
 $
  Derivative Liabilities $1,923
 $(372) $
 $1,551
June 30, 2017 Derivative Assets $132
 $(132) $
 $
  Derivative Liabilities $2,369
 $(132) $
 $2,237
(In thousands)Gross Amount Reported on Balance SheetNetting AdjustmentsCash Collateral PostedNet Exposure
March 31, 2022Derivative Assets$6,250 $(1,147)$— $5,103 
Derivative Liabilities1,691 (1,147)— 544 
June 30, 2021Derivative Assets4,643 (23)— 4,620 
Derivative Liabilities3,208 (23)— 3,185 
Cash Flow Hedges
Changes in the fair value of the Company’s coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to the extent effective, are deferred in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the same period or periods in which the hedged forecasted purchases affect earnings, or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. Based on recorded values at DecemberMarch 31, 2017, $(4.1)2022, $9.4 million of net lossesgains on coffee-relatedcoffee-
11

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








related derivative instruments designated as a cash flow hedgeshedge are expected to be reclassified into cost of goods sold within the next twelve months. These recorded values are based on market prices of the commodities as of DecemberMarch 31, 2017. Due2022.
The Company had designated the Rate Swap derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge; however, during the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company de-designated the Rate Swap derivative instrument. The frozen AOCI is subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings or when it is probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period. As of March 31, 2022, $1.1 million of net losses on the Rate Swap de-designated as a cash flow hedge are expected to the volatile nature of commodity prices, actual gains or losses realizedbe reclassified into interest expense within the next twelve months will likely differ from these values.

months.
Note 8. Investments
The following table shows gains and losses on trading securities: 
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Total gains (losses) recognized from trading securities $16
 $(1,350) $7
 $(1,091)
Less: Realized (losses) gains from sales of trading securities 
 (2) 7
 (2)
Unrealized gains (losses) from trading securities $16
 $(1,348) $
 $(1,089)

Note 9.5. Fair Value Measurements
Assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
(In thousands)(In thousands)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
March 31, 2022March 31, 2022
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets (1)Coffee-related derivative assets (1)$5,561 $— $5,561 $— 
Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)24 — 24 — 
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(1)Coffee-related derivative assets(1)526 — 526 — 
Interest rate swap derivative assets (1)Interest rate swap derivative assets (1)162 — 162 — 
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1)Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1)1,123 — 1,123 — 
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities (2)Interest rate swap derivative liabilities (2)544 — 544 — 
TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
(In thousands) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
December 31, 2017        
Preferred stock $
 $
 $
 $
June 30, 2021June 30, 2021
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:        Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(1) $332
 $
 $332
 $
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1) $1,665
 $
 $1,665
 $
Coffee-related derivative assets (1)Coffee-related derivative assets (1)$4,115 $— $4,115 $— 
Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)20 — 20 — 
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:        Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:
Coffee-related derivative assets(1) $40
 $
 $40
 $
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1) $258
 $
 $258
 $
        
 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
June 30, 2017        
Preferred stock(2) $368
 $
 $368
 $
Derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative assets(1) $132
 $
 $132

$
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1) $2,179
 $
 $2,179
 $
Derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges:        
Coffee-related derivative liabilities(1) $190
 $
 $190
 $
Coffee-related derivative assets (1)Coffee-related derivative assets (1)528 — 528 — 
Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)Coffee-related derivative liabilities (1)— — 
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities (2)Interest rate swap derivative liabilities (2)3,185 — 3,185 — 
____________________ 
(1)The Company’s coffee-related derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2.
(2)Included in “Short-term investments” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(1)The Company's coffee-related derivative instruments are traded over-the-counter and, therefore, classified as Level 2.
(2)The Company's interest rate swap derivative instrument are model-derived valuations with directly or indirectly observable significant inputs such as interest rate and, therefore, classified as Level 2.
Note 10.6. Accounts Receivable, Net
(In thousands) December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Trade receivables $58,727
 $44,531
Trade receivables$45,943 $37,208 
Other receivables(1) 4,320
 2,636
Other receivables(1)1,869 3,438 
Allowance for doubtful accounts (772) (721)Allowance for doubtful accounts(369)(325)
Accounts receivable, net $62,275
 $46,446
Accounts receivable, net$47,443 $40,321 
__________
(1) At DecemberIncludes vendor rebates and other non-trade receivables.
There was no material change in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the nine months ended March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively, the Company had recorded $1.0 million and $0.4 million, in “Other receivables” included in “Accounts receivable, net” on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets representing earnout receivable from Harris Spice Company.2022.





12


Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










Note 7. Inventories
Note 11. Inventories
(In thousands) December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Coffee    Coffee
Processed $14,514
 $14,085
Processed$27,058 $20,917 
Unprocessed 27,436
 17,083
Unprocessed53,473 34,762 
Total $41,950
 $31,168
Total$80,531 $55,679 
Tea and culinary products    Tea and culinary products
Processed $23,432
 $20,741
Processed$13,003 $15,228 
Unprocessed 999
 74
Unprocessed72 60 
Total $24,431
 $20,815
Total$13,075 $15,288 
Coffee brewing equipment parts $6,903
 $4,268
Coffee brewing equipment parts$7,039 $5,824 
Total inventories $73,284
 $56,251
Total inventories$100,645 $76,791 
In addition to product cost, inventory costs include expenditures such as direct labor and certain supply, freight, warehousing, overhead variances, purchase price variance and overheadother expenses incurred in bringing the inventory to its existing condition and location. The “Unprocessed” inventory values as stated in the above table represent the value of raw materials and the “Processed” inventory values represent all other products consisting primarily of finished goods.
The Company does not expect inventory levels at June 30, 2018 to decrease from the levels at June 30, 2017 and, therefore, recorded no expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017. The Company recorded $0.8 million and $1.7 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Interim LIFO calculations must necessarily be based on management’s estimates of expected fiscal year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these estimates are subject to many forces beyond management’s control, interim results are subject to the final fiscal year-end LIFO inventory valuation.

Note 12.8. Property, Plant and Equipment
(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Buildings and facilities$95,049 $94,846 
Machinery, vehicles and equipment219,893 223,579 
Capitalized software25,238 24,218 
Office furniture and equipment14,240 13,834 
$354,420 $356,477 
Accumulated depreciation(224,761)(218,341)
Land11,955 11,955 
Property, plant and equipment, net$141,614 $150,091 
(In thousands) December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
Buildings and facilities $108,999
 $108,682
Machinery and equipment 212,180
 201,236
Equipment under capital leases 7,516
 7,540
Capitalized software 23,063
 21,794
Office furniture and equipment 12,612
 12,758
  364,370
 352,010
Accumulated depreciation (202,558) (192,280)
Land 16,336
 16,336
Property, plant and equipment, net $178,148
 $176,066
Coffee Brewing Equipment (“CBE”) and Service

Capitalized CBE included in machinery and equipment above are:

(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Coffee Brewing Equipment$94,917 $97,105 
Accumulated depreciation(70,039)(70,705)
  Coffee Brewing Equipment, net$24,878 $26,400 
Depreciation expense related to capitalized CBE and other CBE related expenses provided to customers and reported in cost of goods sold were as follows:
Note 13. Goodwill
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Depreciation expense in COGS$1,829 $2,263 $5,698 $6,957 
CBE Costs excl. depreciation exp6,479 5,499 18,242 17,035 
Other expenses related to CBE provided to customers, such as the cost of servicing that equipment (including service employees’ salaries, cost of transportation and Intangible Assets
The carrying valuethe cost of goodwill in the six months ended December 31, 2017 increased by $10.9 million. This was duesupplies and parts), are considered directly attributable to the acquisitiongeneration of revenues from the Boyd Business adding $11.0 millioncustomers. Therefore, these costs are included in cost of goodwill as well as the final working capital adjustment made to the West Coast Coffee purchase price allocation which reduced goodwill by $0.1 million. The carrying value of goodwill at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 was $21.9 million and $11.0 million, respectively.goods sold.

13

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










Note 9. Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of the Company’s amortized and unamortized intangible assets other than goodwill:
March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
(In thousands)Weighted Average Amortization Period as of March 31, 2022Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
NetGross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amortized intangible assets:
Customer relationships5.0$33,003 $(21,342)$11,661 $33,003 $(19,692)$13,311 
Non-compete agreements0.0220 (220)— 220 (202)18 
Recipes1.6930 (719)211 930 (619)311 
Trade name/brand name1.7510 (448)62 510 (420)90 
Total amortized intangible assets$34,663 $(22,729)$11,934 $34,663 $(20,933)$13,730 
Unamortized intangible assets:
Trademarks, trade names and brand name with indefinite lives$4,522 $— $4,522 $4,522 $— $4,522 
Total unamortized intangible assets$4,522 $— $4,522 $4,522 $— $4,522 
 Total intangible assets$39,185 $(22,729)$16,456 $39,185 $(20,933)$18,252 
  December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
(In thousands) 
Gross Carrying
Amount(1)
 
Accumulated
Amortization(1)
 
Gross Carrying
Amount(1)
 
Accumulated
Amortization(1)
Amortized intangible assets:        
Customer relationships $48,353
 $(12,074) $17,353
 $(10,883)
Non-compete agreements 220
 (61) 220
 (38)
Recipes 930
 (155) 930
 (88)
Trade name/brand name 510
 (185) 510
 (84)
Total amortized intangible assets $50,013
 $(12,475) $19,013
 $(11,093)
Unamortized intangible assets:        
Trade names with indefinite lives $3,640
 $
 $3,640
 $
Trademarks and brand name with indefinite lives 9,858
 
 7,058
 
Total unamortized intangible assets $13,498
 $
 $10,698
 $
     Total intangible assets $63,511
 $(12,475) $29,711
 $(11,093)
___________
(1) Reflects the preliminary purchase price allocation for the acquisition of the Boyd Business. Subject to change based on numerous factors, including the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed and the amount of the final post-closing net working capital adjustment. Adjustments in the purchase price allocation may require a recasting of the amounts allocated to goodwill and intangible assets.

Aggregate amortization expense for the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 20162021 was $1.1$0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. in each period. Aggregate amortization expense for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 20162021 was $1.4$1.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively.in each period.

Note 14.10. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company provides benefit plans for most full-time employees, including 401(k), health and other welfare benefit plans and, in certain circumstances, pension benefits. Generally, the plans provide benefits based on years of service and/or a combination of years of service and earnings. In addition, the Company contributes to two multiemployer defined benefit pension plans, one multiemployer defined contribution pension plan and ten multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. In addition, the Company sponsors a postretirement defined benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees and provides retiree medical coverage and, depending on the age of the retiree, dental and vision coverage. The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit to certain of its employees and retirees.
The Company is required to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company is also required to recognize in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) certain gains and losses that arise during the period but are deferred under pension accounting rules.
Single Employer Pension Plans
TheAs of March 31, 2022, the Company has a defined benefit pension plan, the Farmer Bros. Co. Pension Plan for Salaried Employees (the “Farmer Bros. Plan”), for Company employees hired prior to January 1, 2010, who are not covered under a collective bargaining agreement. The Company amended the Farmer Bros. Plan, freezing the benefit for all participants effective June 30, 2011. After the plan freeze, participants do not accrue any benefits under the Farmer Bros. Plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the Farmer Bros. Plan. As all plan participants became inactive following this pension curtailment, net (gain) loss is now amortized based on the remaining life expectancy of these participants instead of the remaining service period of these participants.
The Company also has two defined benefit pension plans for certain hourly employees, covered under collective bargaining agreements (the “Brewmatic Plan”the "Farmer Bros. Plan" and the “Hourly Employees’Employees' Plan”). Effective October 1, 2016, theThe Company

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


froze benefit accruals and participation in the Hourly Employees’ Plan.these plans effective June 30, 2011 and October 1, 2016, respectively. After the plan freeze,freezes, participants do not accrue any benefits under the plan, and new hires are not eligible to participate in the plan. After the freeze, the participants in the plan are eligible to receive the Company’s matching contributions to their 401(k).
The net periodic benefit (credit) cost for the defined benefit pension plans is as follows:
 Three Months Ended
December 31,
 Six Months Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016 Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)    (In thousands)2022202120222021
Service cost $
 $124
 $
 $248
Service cost$— $— $— $— 
Interest cost 1,432
 1,397
 2,864
 2,794
Interest cost848 859 2,544 2,578 
Expected return on plan assets (1,456) (1,607) (2,912) (3,214)Expected return on plan assets(1,237)(1,038)(3,711)(3,113)
Amortization of net loss(1)
 418
 508
 836
 1,016
Net periodic benefit cost $394
 $422
 $788
 $844
Amortization of net loss(1)Amortization of net loss(1)339 502 1,017 1,507 
Net periodic benefit (credit) costNet periodic benefit (credit) cost$(50)$323 $(150)$972 
___________
(1) These amounts represent the estimated portion of the net loss in AOCI that is expected to be recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the current fiscal year. 
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Fiscal
2018 2017 March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Discount rate3.80% 3.55%Discount rate2.60%2.55%
Expected long-term return on plan assets6.75% 7.75%Expected long-term return on plan assets6.25%6.25%
Basis Used to Determine Expected Long-Term Return on Plan Assets
The expected long-term return on plan assets assumption was developed as a weighted average rate based on the target asset allocation of the plan and the Long-Term Capital Market Assumptions (CMA) 2014. The capital market assumptions were developed with a primary focus on forward-looking valuation models and market indicators. The key fundamental economic inputs for these models are future inflation, economic growth, and interest rate environment. Due to the long-term nature of the pension obligations, the investment horizon for the CMA 2014 is 20 to 30 years. In addition to forward-looking models, historical analysis of market data and trends was reflected, as well as the outlook of recognized economists, organizations and consensus CMA from other credible studies.
Multiemployer Pension Plans
The Company participates in twoone multiemployer defined benefit pension plan that is union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, called the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan ("WCTPP"). The Company makes contributions to this plan generally based on the number of hours
14

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








worked by the participants in accordance with the provisions of negotiated labor contracts. The company also contributes to two defined contribution pension plans (All Other Plans) that are union sponsored and collectively bargained for the benefit of certain employees subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan (“WCTPP”) is individually significant. The Company makes contributions to these plans generally based on the number of hours workedagreements.

Contributions made by the participants in accordance withCompany to the provisions of negotiated labor contracts.
The risks of participating in multiemployer pension plans are different from single-employer plans in that: (i) assets contributed to a multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers; (ii) if a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers; and (iii) if the Company stops participating in the multiemployer plan, the Company may be required to pay the plan an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred towere as a withdrawal liability.follows:
On October 30, 2017, counsel to the Company received written confirmation that the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust (the “WCT Pension Trust”) will be retracting its claim, stated in its letter to the Company dated July 10, 2017 (the “WCT Pension Trust Letter”), that certain of the Company’s employment actions in 2015 resulting from the Corporate Relocation Plan constituted a partial withdrawal from the WCTPP.  The written confirmation stated that the WCT Pension Trust has determined that a partial withdrawal did not occur in 2015 and further stated that the withdrawal liability assessment has been rescinded.  This rescinding of withdrawal liability assessment applies to Company employment actions in 2015 with respect to the bargaining units that were specified in the WCT Pension Trust Letter.  As of

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


December 31, 2017, the Company is not able to predict whether the WCT Pension Trust may make a claim, or estimate the extent of potential withdrawal liability, related to the Corporate Relocation Plan for actions or bargaining units other than those specified in the WCT Pension Trust Letter.
In fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the Local 807 Labor-Management Pension Fund (“Pension Fund”) and recorded a charge of $4.3 million associated with withdrawal from this plan, representing the present value of the estimated withdrawal liability expected to be paid in quarterly installments of $0.1 million over 80 quarters. On November 18, 2014, the Pension Fund sent the Company a notice of assessment of withdrawal liability in the amount of $4.4 million, which the Pension Fund adjusted to $4.9 million on January 5, 2015. The Company is in the process of negotiating a reduced liability amount. The Company has commenced quarterly installment payments to the Pension Fund of $91,000 pending the final settlement of the liability. The total estimated withdrawal liability is $4.0 million and its present value are reflected in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 as short-term with the expectation of paying off the liability in fiscal 2018.
Future collective bargaining negotiations may result in the Company withdrawing from the remaining multiemployer pension plans in which it participates and, if successful, the Company may incur a withdrawal liability, the amount of which could be material to the Company’s results of operations and cash flows.
 Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Contributions to WCTPP$275 $260 $679 $783 
Contributions to All Other Plans12 19 26 
Multiemployer Plans Other Than Pension Plans
The Company participates in ten9 multiemployer defined contribution plans other than pension plans that provide medical, vision, dental and disability benefits for active, union-represented employees subject to collective bargaining agreements. The plans are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, and provide that participating employers make monthly contributions to the plans in an amount as specified in the collective bargaining agreements. Also, the plans provide that participants make self-payments to the plans, the amounts of which are negotiated through the collective bargaining process. The Company’s participation in these plans is governed by collective bargaining agreements which expire on or before JulyJanuary 31, 2020.2025.
401(k) Plan
The Company’sFarmer Bros. Co. 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) is available to all eligible employees. The 401(k) Plan match portion is available to all eligible employees who have worked more than 1,000 hours during a calendar year and were employed at the end of the calendar year. Participants in the 401(k) Plan may choose to contribute a percentage of their annual pay subject to the maximum contribution allowed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company’sCompany's matching contribution is discretionary, based on approval by the Company’sCompany's Board of Directors. For
In March 2020, due to the calendar years 2018impact the COVID-19 pandemic had on our business and 2017,financial results, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Company elected to suspend the 401(k) Plan matching contribution offor non-union employees.
Beginning in July 2021, the Company re-instated a 401(k) Plan matching program (the “401(k) Match”) for non-union employees, by matching 50% of an employee’sany non-union employee's annual contribution to the 401(k) Plan, up to 6% of the employee’ssuch employee's eligible income. The matching contributions (and any earnings thereon) vest at the rate of 20% for each of the participant’s first 5 years of vesting service, so that a participantincome, which is fully vested in his or her matching contribution account after 5 years of vesting service, subject to accelerated vesting under certain circumstances in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan duesubstantially similar to the closureprogram prior to its suspension in March 2020.
Beginning in January 2022, the Company amended the 401(k) Match, whereby the Company on a quarterly basis, will contribute, instead of cash, shares of the Company’s Torrance Facility,common stock., par value $1.00 per share (the “Common Stock”) with a reduction-in-force at another Company facility designated byvalue equal to 50% of any non-union employee's annual contribution to the Administrative Committee401(k) Plan, up to 6% of such employee's eligible income . The terms of the Farmer Bros. Co. Qualified Employee Retirement Plans, or in connection with certain reductions-in-force that occurred during 2017. A participant is automatically vested inmatch are substantially the event of death, disability or attainment of age 65 while employed bysame as the Company. Employees are 100% vested in their contributions. For employees subject to a collective bargaining agreement, the match is only available if so provided in the labor agreement.
safe-harbor non-elective contribution. The Company recorded matching contributions of $0.5$0.5 million and $0.3$1.6 million in operating expenses in the three and nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022.
Additionally, the Company makes an annual safe harbor non-elective contribution of Common Stock equal to 4% of each eligible participant’s annual plan compensation. During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2016, respectively,2021, the Company contributed a total of 90,329 and $1.0162,259 of shares Common Stock with a value of $0.6 million and $0.8 million, in operating expensesrespectively, to eligible participants’ annual plan compensation.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company contributed a total of 224,363 and 347,356 shares of Common Stock with a value of $1.8 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to eligible participants’ annual plan compensation.
Effective January 1, 2022, the Company amended the 401(k) Plan to, among other things, increase the number of shares of Common Stock, available for issuance under the 401(k) Plan by 2,000,000 additional shares of Common Stock and permit participants in the six months ended December 31, 2017401(k) Plan to invest a portion of their 401(k) Plan accounts into Common Stock.
Effective January 1, 2022, the Company merged the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) into the 401(k) Plan and 2016, respectively.transferred all of the assets and shares in the ESOP to the 401(k) Plan.
15

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








Postretirement Benefits
TheRetiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit
On March 23, 2020, the Company sponsorsannounced a plan to amend and terminate the postretirement definedmedical benefit plan that covers qualified non-union retirees and certain qualified union retirees (“Retiree Medical Plan”). effective January 1, 2021. As a result, the re-measurement generated a prior service credit. This credit, along with actuarial gains, were amortized over the remaining months of the plan through January 1, 2021. The plan provides medical, dental and vision coverage for retirees under age 65 and medical coverage only for retirees age 65 and above. Under this postretirement plan, the Company’s contributions toward premiums for retiree medical, dental and vision coverage for participants and dependents are scaled based on length of service, with greater Company contributions for retirees with greater length of service, subject to a maximum monthly Company contribution.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Retiree Medical Plan is now terminated.
The Company also provides a postretirement death benefit (“Death(the “Death Benefit”) Plan) to certain of its employees and retirees, subject, in the case of current employees, to continued employment with the Company until retirement and certain other conditions related to the manner of employment termination and manner of death. TheIn June 2021, the Company recordsamended the actuarially determined liability for the present valueDeath Benefit Plan effective immediately, which triggered re-measurement of the postretirement death benefit. The Company has purchased life insurance policies to fundplan. In conjunction with the postretirement death benefit whereinamendment, the Company ownscreated a new Executive Death Benefit Plan (the “Executive Death Benefit Plan”) for a small group of participants in the policy butDeath Benefit Plan. Under the postretirement death benefit is paid toExecutive Death Benefit Plan, the employee’s or retiree’s beneficiary. The Company records an asset forparticipants receive the fair value ofsame benefits they would have received under the life insurance policies which equates to the cash surrender value of the policies. 
Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit Plan.
The following table shows the components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost (credit) for the Retiree Medical Plan and Death Benefit Plan for the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016. Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 was based on employee census information and asset information as of June 30, 2017.2021.
 Three Months Ended
December 31,
 Six Months Ended
December 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)        (In thousands)2022202120222021
Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (Credit):Components of Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (Credit):
Service cost $152
 $190
 $304
 $380
Service cost$— $$— $14 
Interest cost 209
 207
 418
 414
Interest cost73 20 220 
Amortization of net gain (210) (157) (420) (314)Amortization of net gain80 (5,376)
Amortization of prior service credit (439) (439) (878) (878)Amortization of prior service credit— — — (8,961)
Net periodic postretirement benefit credit $(288) $(199) $(576) $(398)
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (credit)Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (credit)$$158 $28 $(14,103)
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost 
 Fiscal year
 20222021
Retiree Medical Plan discount rateN/A0.06%
Death Benefit Plan discount rate2.72%2.87%
 Fiscal
 2018 2017
Retiree Medical Plan discount rate4.13% 3.73%
Death Benefit discount rate4.12% 3.79%

Note 15. Bank Loan11. Debt Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company’s debt obligations:
March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
(In thousands)Debt Origination DateMaturityPrincipal Borrowing AmountCarrying ValueWeighted Average Interest Rate (1)Carrying ValueWeighted Average Interest Rate
RevolverVarious4/25/2025N/A$54,500 2.75 %$43,500 6.21 %
Term Loan4/26/20214/25/2025$47,50044,694 7.50 %45,278 7.50 %
     Total$99,194 $88,778 
__________
(1) The weighted average interest rate excludes the fixed rate on the de-designated Amended Rate Swap
On April 26, 2021, the Company maintainsentered into a $125.0 millionnew senior secured revolving credit facility composed of (a) a Credit Agreement, (the “Revolving Facility”“Revolver Credit Facility Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.by and SunTrust Bankamong the Company, Boyd Assets Co., FBC Finance Company, Coffee Bean Holding Co., Inc., Coffee Bean International, Inc. and China Mist Brands, Inc., as borrowers (collectively, the “Lenders”“Borrowers”), withWells Fargo, as administrative agent and lender, and the other lenders party thereto, and various loan documents relating thereto including the Guaranty and Security Agreement, (the “Revolver Security Agreement”), by and among the Borrowers, as grantors, and Wells Fargo, as administrative agent, and (b) a Credit Agreement, (the “Term Credit Facility Agreement”) by and among the Borrowers, MGG Investment Group LP. (“MGG”), as administrative agent, and the lenders party thereto, and various loan documents relating thereto including the Guaranty and Security Agreement, (the “Term Security Agreement”), by and among the Borrowers, as grantors, and MGG, as administrative agent.
16

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








The following is a summary description of the Revolver Credit Facility Agreement and the Revolver Security Agreement key items. Please refer to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 for the full text of the agreements.
The Revolver Credit Facility Agreement, among other things includes:
1.A commitment of up to $80.0 million (“Revolver”);
2.sublimit on letters of credit of $10.0 million;
3.maturity date of April 25, 2025, and swingline loanshas no scheduled payback required on the principal prior to the maturity date;
4.full collateralization by all existing and future capital stock of $30.0the Borrowers (other than the Company) and all of the Borrowers' personal and real property;
5.Revolver calculated as the lesser of (a) $80.0 million and $15.0 million respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby(b) the Company may increaseamount derived pursuant to a borrowing base composed of the Revolving Commitment by up to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on the Company’ssum of (i) 85% of eligible accounts receivable (less a dilution reserve), plus (ii) the lesser of: (a) 80% of eligible raw material inventory, eligible in-transit inventory and eligible finished goods inventory (collectively, “Eligible Inventory”), and (b) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves. The commitment fee is a flat fee of 0.25%Eligible Inventory, minus (c) applicable reserve;
6.interest under the Revolver equal to either LIBOR + 2.25% per annum, irrespective of average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of the Company’s assets, excluding certain real property not includedwith LIBOR floor 0.50%, or base rate + 1.25% per annum; and
7.Financial covenants, in the borrowing base and machinery and equipment (other than inventory). Borrowingsevent that Borrowers' availability to borrow under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25%Revolver falls below $10.0 million requiring the Company to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. The Company is subject to a variety of affirmative and negative covenants of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance ofhave a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances,of at least 1.00:1.00 at all such times.
The Revolver Credit Facility Agreement and the rightRevolver Security Agreement contain customary affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions typical for a financing of this type that, among other things, require the Company to satisfy certain financial covenants and restrict the Company's and its subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends and make distributions, make certain investments and acquisitions, repurchase its stock and prepay certain indebtedness, create liens, enter into agreements with affiliates, modify the nature of its business, transfer and sell material assets and merge or consolidate. Non-compliance with one or more of the Lenderscovenants and restrictions could result in the full or partial principal balance of the Revolver Credit Facility Agreement becoming immediately due and payable and termination of the commitments.
The following is a summary description of the Term Credit Facility Agreement and the Term Security Agreement key items. Please refer to establish reserveExhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2021 for the full text of the agreements.
The Term Credit Facility Agreement, among other things includes:
1.total commitment of $47.5 million in the form of a term loan (“Term Loan”);
2.maturity date of April 25, 2025;
3.full collateralization by all existing and future capital stock of the Borrowers (other than the Company) and all of the Borrowers' personal and real property;
4.interest under the Term Loan is either (a) LIBOR + 6.5% per annum, with LIBOR Floor 1.0%, or (b) base rate + 5.50% per annum, with a 3% floor on base rate; and
5.financial covenants include;
(i) commencing on the fiscal quarter ending on March 31, 2022, quarterly minimum EBITDA and fixed charge coverage ratio requirements which may reducespecified therein.
The Term Credit Facility Agreement and the Term Security Agreement contain customary affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions typical for a financing of this type that, among other things, require the Company to satisfy certain financial covenants and restrict the Company's and its subsidiaries' ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends and make distributions, make certain investments and acquisitions, repurchase its stock and prepay certain indebtedness, create liens, enter into agreements with affiliates, modify the nature of its business, transfer and sell material assets and merge or consolidate. Non-compliance with one or more of the covenants and restrictions could result in the full or partial principal balance of the Term Credit Facility Agreement becoming immediately due and payable and termination of the commitments.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2022, the Company commenced quarterly principal payments due on the Term Loan debt obligation in the amount of credit otherwise available to$950 thousand. At March 31, 2022, the Company. The Company is allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default exists or has occurred and is continuing as of the date of any such payment and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility matures on August 25, 2022.
At December 31, 2017, the Company was eligible to borrow up to a total of $110.0 million under the Revolving Facility and had outstanding borrowings on the Revolver Credit Facility of $84.4$54.5 million and had utilized $1.1$4.1 million of the letters of credit sublimit, andsublimit. At March 31, 2022, we had excess availability under the Revolving Facility$22.3 million available on our Revolver Credit Facility.
17

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








As of $24.5 million. At DecemberMarch 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate
on the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 3.62% and2022, the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictivefinancial covenants under the Revolving Facility.Revolver Credit Facility Agreement and the Term Credit Facility Agreement (collectively, the “Credit Facilities”). Furthermore, the Company believes it will be in compliance with the related financial covenants under these agreements for the next twelve months.

In connection with the Credit Facilities, the Company executed the Amended Rate Swap. Under the terms of the Amended Rate Swap, the Company receives 1-month LIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, and makes payments based on a fixed rate of 2.4725%, an increase of 0.275% from its original interest rate swap fixed rate of 2.1975%. The Amended Rate Swap utilizes the same notional amount of $65.0 million and maturity date of October 11, 2023 as the original interest rate swap.
Note 12. Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) was established in 2000. As of December 31, 2018, the Company froze the ESOP such that (i) no employees of the Company may commence participation in the ESOP on or after December 31, 2018; (ii) no Company contributions will be made to the ESOP with respect to services performed or compensation received after December 31, 2018; and (iii) the ESOP accounts of all individuals who are actively employed by the Company and participating in the ESOP on December 31, 2018 will be fully vested as of such date. Additionally, the Administrative Committee, with the consent of the Board of Directors, designated certain employees who were terminated in connection with certain reductions-in-force in 2018 to be fully vested in their ESOP accounts as of their severance dates.
Effective January 1, 2022, the Company merged the ESOP plan into the 401(k) Plan and transferred all of the assets and shares in the ESOP to the 401(k) Plan. As of March 31, 2022, there are no shares left in the ESOP plan.
Note 16.13. Share-based Compensation
Farmer Bros. Co. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan
On June 20, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), the Company’s stockholders approved the Farmer Bros. Co.Amended and Restated 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”). The 2017 Plan succeeded the Company’s prior long-term incentive plans, the Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Amended Equity Plan”) and the Farmer Bros. Co. 2007 Omnibus Plan (collectively, the “Prior Plans”). On the Effective Date, the Company ceased granting awards under the Prior Plans; however, awards outstanding under the Prior Plans will remain subject to the terms of the applicable Prior Plan. The 2017 Plan provides for the grant of stock options (including incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options), stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents, performance shares and other stock- or cash-based awards to eligible participants. The 2017 Plan also authorizes the grant of awards that are intended to qualify as “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Non-employee directors of the Company and employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards under the 2017 Plan.
The 2017 Plan authorizes the issuance of (i) 900,000 shares of common stock plus (ii) the number of shares of common stock subject to awards under the Company’s Prior Plans that are outstanding as of the Effective Date and that expire or are forfeited, cancelled or similarly lapse following the Effective Date. Subject to certain limitations, shares of common stock covered by awards granted under the 2017 Plan that are forfeited, expire or lapse, or are repurchased for or paid in cash, may be used again for new grants under the 2017 Plan. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, there were 950,9141,616,697 shares available under the 2017 Plan including shares that were forfeited under the Prior Plans. Shares of common stock granted underprior plans for future issuance.
On December 15, 2021, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment (the “Plan Amendment”) to the 2017 Plan, may be authorized but unissued shares, shares purchased onwhich (i) increased the open market or treasury shares. In no event will more than 900,000number of shares of common stock be issuable pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock optionsCommon Stock available for grant under the 2017 Plan.Plan by 1,500,000 additional shares of Common Stock and (ii) allows the Company to utilize awards to attract and incentivize non-employee consultants.
The 2017Farmer Bros. Co. 2020 Inducement Incentive Award Plan contains a minimum vesting requirement, subject to limited exceptions, that awards made(the “2020 Inducement Plan”)
As of March 31, 2022, there were 138,520 shares available under the 2017 Plan may not vest earlier than the date that is one year following the grant date of the award. The 2017 Plan also contains provisions with respect to payment of exercise or purchase prices, vesting and expiration of awards, adjustments and treatment of awards upon certain corporate transactions, including stock splits, recapitalizations and mergers, transferability of awards and tax withholding requirements.
The 2017 Plan may be amended or terminated by the Board at any time, subject to certain limitations requiring stockholder consent or the consent of the applicable participant. In addition, the Administrator of the 2017 Plan may not, without the approval of the Company’s stockholders, authorize certain re-pricings of any outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights granted under the 20172020 Inducement Plan. The 2017 Plan will expire on June 20, 2027.
Non-qualified stock options with time-based vesting (“NQOs”)
In the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 124,278 shares issuable upon the exercise of NQOs to eligible employees under the 2017 Plan. These NQOs have an exercise price of $31.70 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant. One-third of the total number of shares subject to each such stock option vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, contingent on continued employment, and subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances. There were no NQOs granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2022.
The following table summarizes NQO activity for nine months ended March 31, 2022:
Outstanding NQOs:Number
of NQOs
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2021513,325 13.065.17$706 
Granted— — 
Exercised— — 
Forfeited(19,173)16.24— 
Expired(27,028)20.67— 
Outstanding at March 31, 2022467,124 12.524.50$35 
Exercisable at March 31, 2022277,762 13.604.33$12 
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the closing price of Common Stock of $7.12 at March 31, 2022 and $12.69 at June 30, 2021, representing the last trading day of the respective periods, which would have been received by NQO holders had all award holders exercised their NQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.

18

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Following are the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation model for NQOs granted during the six months ended December 31, 2017.
Six Months Ended 
December 31, 2017
Weighted average fair value of NQOs$31.70
Risk-free interest rate2.0%
Dividend yield—%
Average expected term4.6 years
Expected stock price volatility35.4%









There were no options exercised during nine months ended March 31, 2022 and 2020.
At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, respectively, there was $0.4 million and $0.9 million of unrecognized NQO compensation cost. The unrecognized NQO compensation cost at March 31, 2022 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of eight months. Total compensation expense for NQOs was $95.3 thousand and $167.7 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively and $432.9 thousand and $586.8 thousand for the nine months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting (PNQs”)
The following table summarizes NQOPNQ activity for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017:
2022:
Outstanding NQOs: 
Number
of NQOs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2017 133,464
 13.05 5.99 2.6 2,299
Granted 124,278
 31.70 10.41 6.9 
Exercised (37,266) 12.09 5.57  752
Cancelled/Forfeited (4,194) 24.41 10.60  
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 216,282
 23.71 8.51 4.8 1,825
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2017 89,055
 12.33 5.74 2.0 1,765
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017 205,308
 23.28 8.41 4.7 1,820
Outstanding PNQs:Number
of
PNQs
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in 
thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 202111,750 29.760.71$— 
Granted— — 
Exercised— — 
Forfeited— — 
Expired(9,538)29.51— 
Outstanding at March 31, 20222,212 30.911.07$— 
Exercisable at March 31, 20222,211 30.911.07$— 
The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $32.15$7.12 at December 29, 2017March 31, 2022 and $30.25$12.69 at June 30, 2017, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods, which would have been received by NQO holders had all award holders exercised their NQOs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of NQO exercises in the six months ended December 31, 2017 represents the difference between the exercise price and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. NQOs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.
During the six months ended December 31, 2017, 945 NQOs vested and 37,266 NQOs were exercised. Total fair value of NQOs vested during the six months ended December 31, 2017 was $12,000. The Company received $0.5 million and $0.4 million in proceeds from exercises of vested NQOs in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
At December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively, there was $1.3 million and $80,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to NQOs at December 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.8 years. Total compensation expense for NQOs in the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $62,000 and $47,000, respectively. Total compensation expense for NQOs in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $64,000 and $89,000, respectively.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


Non-qualified stock options with performance-based and time-based vesting (PNQs”)
In the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted no shares issuable upon the exercise of PNQs. The following table summarizes PNQ activity for the six months ended December 31, 2017:
Outstanding PNQs: 
Number
of
PNQs
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value ($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in 
thousands)
Outstanding at June 30, 2017 358,786
 27.75 10.96 5.2 1,181
Granted 
    
Exercised (6,679) 26.10 10.87  45
Cancelled/Forfeited (43,330) 32.10 11.43  
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 308,777
 27.1710.93
10.90 4.6 1,590
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2017 200,904
 25.87 10.80 4.2 1,278
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2017 303,990
 27.10 10.89 4.5 1,585

The aggregate intrinsic values outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $32.15 at December 29, 2017 and $30.25 at June 30, 20172021, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods, which would have been received by PNQ holders had all award holders exercised their PNQs that were in-the-money as of those dates. The aggregate intrinsic value of PNQ exercises in the six
There were no options exercised during nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 represents the difference between the exercise price2022 and the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of exercise. PNQs outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.2021.
During the six months ended DecemberAt March 31, 2017, 56,822 PNQs vested and 6,679 PNQs were exercised. Total fair value of PNQs vested during the six months ended December 31, 2017 was $0.6 million. The Company received $0.2 million and $0.1 million in proceeds from exercises of vested PNQs in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, the Company met the performance targets for the fiscal 2016 PNQ awards and the fiscal 2015 PNQ awards.
In the six months ended December 31, 2017, based on the Company’s failure to achieve certain financial objectives over the applicable performance period, a total of 33,738 shares subject to fiscal 2017 PNQ awards were forfeited, representing 20% of the shares subject to each such award. Subject to certain continued employment conditions and subject to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances, one half of the remaining PNQs subject to the fiscal 2017 PNQ awards are scheduled to vest on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
At December 31, 20172022 and June 30, 2017,2021, there was $0.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of no unrecognized PNQ compensation cost related to PNQs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PNQs at December 31, 2017 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.2 years. Total cost. There was no compensation expense related to PNQs in the three and nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016 was $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Total compensation expense related to PNQs in the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.2021.
Restricted Stock
During the six months ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 13,110 shares of restricted stock under the 2017 Plan, including 11,406 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors with a grant date fair value of $34.20 per share and 1,704 shares of restricted stock to eligible employees with a grant date fair value of $31.70 per share. The fiscal 2018 restricted stock awards cliff vest on the earlier of the one year anniversary of the grant date or the date of the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders immediately following the grant date, in the case of non-employee directors, and the third anniversary of the grant date, in the case of eligible employees, in each case subject to continued service to the Company through the vesting date and the acceleration provisions of the 2017 Plan and restricted stock agreement. During the six months ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 5,106 shares of restricted stock to non-employee directors.
During the six months ended December 31, 2017, 7,934 shares of restricted stock vested.

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)



The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017:
2022:
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards: 
Shares
Awarded
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding and Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards:Shares
Awarded
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value ($)
Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2017 15,445
 29.79
 0.9 467
Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2021Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2021681,570 $10.47 
Granted 13,110
 33.88
 1.7 444
Granted423,408 7.61 
Vested/Released (7,934) 32.77
  272
Vested/Released(260,011)5.02 
Cancelled/Forfeited (3,390) 25.57
  
Cancelled/Forfeited(105,072)7.00 
Outstanding and nonvested at December 31, 2017 17,231
 32.35
 1.6 554
Expected to vest at December 31, 2017 16,411
 32.32
 1.5 528
Outstanding and nonvested at March 31, 2022Outstanding and nonvested at March 31, 2022739,895 $6.78 

The total grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was $3.5 million.
The aggregate intrinsic values of shares outstanding at the end of each fiscal period in the table above represent the total pretax intrinsic values, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $32.15 at December 29, 2017 and $30.25 at June 30, 2017, representing the last trading day of the respective fiscal periods. Restricted stock that is expected to vest is net of estimated forfeitures.
At DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and June 30, 2017,2021, there was $0.5$4.0 million and $0.3$2.8 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock. The unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock at DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 1.1 years. 1.4 years. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.1$0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in each of the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. Total compensation expense for restricted stock was $0.1$1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in each of the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.
19

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (“PBRSUs”)
DuringThe following table summarizes PBRSU activity for the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022:
Outstanding and Nonvested PBRSUs:PBRSUs
Awarded(1)
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value ($)
Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2021354,466 $6.06 
Granted(1)158,659 8.91 
Vested/Released(381)25.04 
Cancelled/Forfeited(17,671)3.11 
Outstanding and nonvested at March 31, 2022495,073 $5.14 
_____________
(1) The target number of PBRSUs is presented in the table. Under the terms of the awards, the recipient may earn between 0% and 200% of the target number of PBRSUs depending on the extent to which the Company meets or exceeds the achievement of the applicable financial performance goals.
The total grant-date fair value of PBRSUs granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was $1.4 million.
At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, there was $1.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively, of unrecognized PBRSU compensation cost. The unrecognized PBRSU compensation cost at March 31, 2022 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.2 years. Total compensation expense for PBRSUs was $173.3 thousand and $192.5 thousand, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Total compensation expense for PBRSUs was $0.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2022. For the nine months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reversed the previously recognized nonvested compensation expense of $295.8 thousand for awards granted prior to fiscal 2021 since it was deemed not probable that the Company will achieve the target performance conditions.
Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units (“CSRSUs”)
CSRSUs vest in equal installments over a three-year period from the grant date, and are cash-settled upon vesting based on the closing share price of Common Stock on the vesting date.
The CSRSUs are accounted for as liability awards, and compensation expense is measured at fair value on the date of grant and recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period net of forfeitures. Compensation expense is remeasured at each reporting date with a cumulative adjustment to compensation cost during the period based on changes in the closing share price of Common Stock.
The following table summarizes CSRSU activity for the nine months ended March 31, 2022:
Outstanding and Nonvested CSRSUs:CSRSUs
Awarded
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value ($)
Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2021185,602 $4.31 
Granted85,851 8.91 
Vested/Released(52,583)4.31 
Cancelled/Forfeited(59,211)5.52 
Outstanding and nonvested at March 31, 2022159,659 $6.34 
The total grant-date fair value of CSRSUs granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was $0.8 million.
At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, there was $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation cost related to CSRSU. The unrecognized compensation cost related to CSRSU at March 31, 2022 is expected to be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.0 years. Total compensation expense for CSRSUs was $25.0 thousand and $142.0 thousand, respectively for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2022. Total compensation expense for CSRSUs was $192.5 thousand and $213.1 thousand in the three and nine months ended March 31, 2021.
Performance Cash Awards (“PCAs”)
In November 2019, the Company granted 37,414 PBRSUsPCAs under the 2017 Plan to eligible employees with a grant date fair value of $31.70 per unit.certain employees. The fiscal 2018 PBRSU awardsPCAs cliff vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant based on the Company’s achievement of certain financial performance goals for the performance period July 1, 20172019 through June 30, 2020,2022, subject to certain continued employment conditions and subject to acceleration provisions of the 2017 Plan and restricted stock unit agreement.Plan. At the end of the three-year performance period, the numberamount of PBRSUsPCAs that actually vest will be 0% to 150%200% of the target amount, depending on the extent to which the Company meets or exceeds the achievement of those financial performance goals measured over the full three-year performance period. No PBRSUs were granted during the six months ended December 31, 2016.
The following table summarizes PBRSU activity for the six months ended December 31, 2017:
Outstanding and Nonvested PBRSUs: 
PBRSUs
Awarded
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life
(Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($ in thousands)
Outstanding and nonvested at June 30, 2017 
 
 
 
Granted(1) 37,414
 31.70
 
 1,186
Vested/Released 
 
 
 
Cancelled/Forfeited 
 
 
 
Outstanding and nonvested at December 31, 2017 37,414
 31.70
 2.9
 1,203
Expected to vest at December 31, 2017 32,495
 31.70
 2.9
 1,045
_____________
(1) The target number of PBRSUs is presented in the table. Under the terms of the awards, the recipient may earn between 0% and 150% of the target number of PBRSUs depending on the extent to which the Company meets or exceeds the achievement of the applicable financial performance goals.

The aggregate intrinsic value of PBRSUs outstanding at December 31, 2017 represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $32.15 at December 29, 2017, representing the last trading day of the fiscal period. PBRSUs that are expected to vest are net of estimated forfeitures.

20

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)











At December 31, 2017The PCAs are measured initially based on a fixed amount of the awards at the date of grant and June 30, 2017, there was $1.1 million and $0, respectively,are required to be re-measured based on the probability of unrecognized compensation cost related to PBRSUs. The unrecognized compensation cost related to PBRSUsachieving the performance conditions at December 31, 2017each reporting date until settlement. Compensation expense for PCAs is expected to be recognized over the weighted average periodapplicable performance periods. The Company records a liability equal to the cost of 2.9 years. TotalPCAs for which achievement of the performance condition is deemed probable. As of March 31, 2022 and 2021, there was no liability and no unrecognized PCA compensation expense for PBRSUscost since it was $48,000deemed not probable that the Company will achieve the target performance conditions.
Note 14. Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid$2,496 $2,051 
Accrued workers’ compensation liabilities989 1,016 
Finance lease liabilities193 192 
Other (1)4,156 3,166 
Other current liabilities$7,834 $6,425 
_________
(1) Includes accrued property taxes, sales and $0 for the three months ended December 31, 2017use taxes and 2016, respectively. Total compensation expense for PBRSUs was $48,000 and $0 for the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.insurance liabilities other than workers compensation.
Note 17.15. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities include the following:
(In thousands) December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017(In thousands)March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
Earnout payable(1) $1,100
 $1,100
Derivative liabilities—noncurrent 
 380
Derivative liabilities—noncurrent$— $1,653 
Multiemployer Plan Holdback—Boyd Coffee 1,056
 
Deferred compensation (1)Deferred compensation (1)215 1,716 
Finance lease liabilitiesFinance lease liabilities447 563 
Deferred income taxes and other liabilitiesDeferred income taxes and other liabilities1,160 1,160 
Other long-term liabilities $2,156
 $1,480
Other long-term liabilities$1,822 $5,092 
___________
(1) Includes $0.5 millionpayroll taxes and $0.6 million in earnout payable in connection with the Company’s acquisition of substantially all of the assets of China Mist completed on October 11, 2016 and the Company’s acquisition of West Coast Coffee completed on February 7, 2017, respectively. See Note 3.cash-settled restricted stock units liabilities.

Note 18.16. Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017,The income tax expense and the President of the United States signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”). related effective tax rates are as follows (in thousands, except effective tax rate):
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
2022202120222021
Income tax expense (benefit)$90 $(60)$278 $13,785 
Effective tax rate(2.3)%0.4 %(2.4)%(57.7)%
The SEC subsequently issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for theCompany’s interim tax effects of the Tax Act. Under SAB 118, companies are able to record a reasonable estimate of the impacts of the Tax Act if oneprovision is able to be determined and report it as a provisional amount during the measurement period. The measurement period is not to extend beyond one year from the enactment date. Impacts of the Tax Act that a company is not able to make a reasonable estimate for should not be recorded until a reasonable estimate can be made during the measurement period. 

In the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Company revised itsusing an estimated annual effective tax rate to reflect a changeand adjusted for discrete taxable events that may occur during the quarter. The Company recognizes the effects of tax legislation in the federal statutory rate from 35.0%period in which the law is enacted. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are remeasured using enacted tax rates expected to 28.1%. The changeapply to taxable income in statutory rate was made as a result of the Tax Act. The rate change is administratively effective as of the enactment date andyears the Company is using a blended rate of 28.1% for its fiscal year ending on June 30, 2018, as prescribed. In addition, inestimates the three months ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized tax expense related temporary differences to adjusting its deferred tax balances to reflect the new corporate tax rate. Deferred tax amounts are calculated based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. The Company is analyzing certain aspects of the Tax Act and refining its calculations which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred tax balance was $(20.3) million at December 31, 2017.

The Company’s effective tax rates for the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were 976.2% and 40.1%, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates for the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were 4,449.3% and 40.1%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were higher than the U.S. statutory rates of 28.1% and 35.0%, respectively, primarily due to income tax expense of $(20.3) million resulting from the adjustment of deferred tax amounts due to enactment of the Tax Act.

reverse. The Company evaluates its deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if a valuation allowance is required. In making such assessment, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified, such as recent operating results, and less consideration is given to less objective indicators such as future income projections. After considerationThe difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate in each period presented primarily results from state tax expenses and changes in the Company’s valuation allowance. The effective tax rates for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2021 were also affected by tax expense of positive and negative evidence, including$13.5 million related to previously deferred non-cash tax expense in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with gains on the recent historypostretirement medical plan in prior years.
Tax expense in the three months ended March 31, 2022 was $89.5 thousand compared to income tax benefit of $60.0 thousand in the three months ended March 31, 2021. Tax expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was $278.0 thousand compared to $13.8 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2021, which primarily relates to $13.5 million of previously deferred non-cash tax expense in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with gains on the postretirement medical plan in prior years.
The Company files its tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. In the normal course of business, the Company concluded that it is more likely than not thatsubject to examination by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities. With limited exceptions, as of March 31, 2022, the Company will generate futureis no longer subject to income sufficient to realize the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets.audits by taxing authorities for any years
As of December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017 the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits.
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 beginning July 1, 2017 and upon adoption recognized the excess tax benefits of $1.6 million as an increase to deferred tax assets and a corresponding increase to retained earnings.

21

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










prior to 2019. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company does not believe the outcome of any future audit will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 19.17. Net (Loss) IncomeLoss Per Common Share

ComputationBasic net (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to the Company by the weighted average number of EPS forcommon shares outstanding during the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 excludesperiods presented. Diluted net (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing diluted net loss attributable to the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding adjusted to include the effect, if dilutive, effect of 525,059 shares issuable underthe exercise of in-the-money stock options, 37,414 PBRSUsunvested performance-based restricted stock units, and 383,611 shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of the outstanding Company’s Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share (“Series A Preferred Stock becauseStock”), as converted, during the Company incurred net losses inperiods presented. The calculation of dilutive shares outstanding excludes out-of-the-money stock options (i.e., such option’s exercise prices were greater than the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 so their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Computationaverage market price of EPSour common shares for the threeperiod) and six months ended December 31, 2016 includes the dilutive effect of 122,897 shares and 122,142 shares, respectively, issuable underunvested performance-based restricted stock options with exercise prices below the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the applicable period, but excludes the dilutive effect of 29,032 and 24,804 shares, respectively, issuable under stock options with exercise prices above the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the applicable periodunits because their inclusion would behave been anti-dilutive.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted net earnings loss per common share:
  
Three Months Ended
December 31,
 
Six Months Ended
December 31,
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Undistributed net (loss) income available to common stockholders $(18,887) $20,052
 $(19,865) $21,669
Undistributed net (loss) income available to nonvested restricted stockholders (10) 24
 (10) 25
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders—basic $(18,897) $20,076
 $(19,875) $21,694
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic 16,723,498
 16,584,106
 16,711,660
 16,573,545
Effect of dilutive securities:        
Shares issuable under stock options 
 122,897
 
 122,142
Shares issuable PBRSUs 
 
 
 
Shares issuable under convertible preferred stock 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted 16,723,498
 16,707,003
 16,711,660
 16,695,687
Net (loss) income per common share available to common stockholders—basic $(1.13) $1.21
 $(1.19) $1.31
Net (loss) income per common share available to common stockholders—diluted $(1.13) $1.20
 $(1.19) $1.30
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)2022202120222021
Undistributed net loss available to common stockholders$(3,993)$(13,234)$(11,854)$(36,601)
Undistributed net loss available to nonvested restricted stockholders and holders of convertible preferred stock(196)(594)(474)(1,507)
Net loss available to common stockholders - basic$(4,189)$(13,828)$(12,328)$(38,108)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic18,289,815 17,756,619 18,118,469 17,569,026 
Effect of dilutive securities:
Shares issuable under stock options— — — — 
Shares issuable under PBSRUs— — — — 
Shares issuable under convertible preferred stock— — — — 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted18,289,815 17,756,619 18,118,469 17,569,026 
Net loss available to common stockholders per common share—basic$(0.23)$(0.78)$(0.68)$(2.17)
Net loss available to common stockholders per common share—diluted$(0.23)$(0.78)$(0.68)$(2.17)

The following table summarizes anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
2022202120222021
Shares issuable under stock options467,124 421,167 471,380 421,167 
Shares issuable under convertible preferred stock448,741 433,373 448,741 433,373 
Shares issuable under PBRSUs495,073 185,236 454,110 104,271 
Note 20.18. Preferred Stock
The Company is authorized to issue 500,000 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $1.00, including 21,000 authorized shares of Series A Preferred Stock.
Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock
On October 2, 2017, the Company issued 14,700 shares of Series A Preferred Stock in connection with the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the Boyd Coffee acquisition. TheCompany. At March 31, 2022, Series A Preferred Stock pays an annual dividend, when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, of 3.5%consisted of the stated value per share payable in four quarterly installments in arrears,following:
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Shares AuthorizedShares Issued and OutstandingStated Value per ShareCarrying ValueCumulative Preferred Dividends, Undeclared and UnpaidLiquidation Preference
21,000 14,700 $1,170 $17,196 $2,496 $17,196 
Note 19. Revenue Recognition
The Company’s primary sources of revenue are sales of coffee, tea and has an initial stated value of $1,000 per share, adjustable up or down by the amount of undeclared and unpaid dividends or subsequent payment of accumulated dividends thereon, respectively, and a conversion premium of 22.5%. Dividends may be paid in cash. At December 31, 2017, theculinary products. The Company had undeclared and unpaid preferred dividends of $128,625 on 14,700 issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. Series A Preferred Stock is a participating security because it has rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to common stockholders. On an as converted basis, holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holdersrecognizes revenue when control of the Company’s common stock and are entitled to share in the dividends on common stock, when declared. Each share of Series A Preferred Stockpromised good or service is convertible into 26 shares of the Company’s common stock (rounded downtransferred to the nearest whole sharecustomer and subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designations filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware). Series A Preferred Stock is a perpetual stock and, therefore, not redeemable. Based on its characteristics,amounts that the Company classified Series A Preferred Stock as permanent equity.

22

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)










expects to collect. The timing of revenue recognition takes into consideration the various shipping terms applicable to the Company’s sales.
Series A Preferred StockThe Company delivers products to customers through Direct-store-delivery (“DSD”) to the Company’s customers at their place of business and Direct ship from the Company’s warehouse to the customer’s warehouse, facility or address. Each delivery or shipment made to a third party customer is carriedto satisfy a performance obligation. Performance obligations generally occur at a point in time and are satisfied when control of the goods passes to the customer. The Company is entitled to collection of the sales price under normal credit terms in the regions in which it operates.
The Company disaggregates net sales from contracts with customers based on the characteristics of the products sold:
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
2022202120222021
(In thousands)$% of total$% of total$% of total$% of total
Net Sales by Product Category:
Coffee (Roasted)$77,503 64.9 %$60,771 65.2 %$223,607 64.6 %$196,352 66.6 %
Tea & Other Beverages (1)21,033 17.6 %17,146 18.4 %62,961 18.2 %51,790 17.5 %
Culinary13,855 11.6 %10,551 11.3 %40,843 11.8 %32,471 11.0 %
Spices5,747 4.8 %4,414 4.8 %16,005 4.6 %13,424 4.6 %
Net sales by product category118,138 98.9 %92,882 99.7 %343,416 99.2 %294,037 99.7 %
Delivery Surcharge1,260 1.1 %270 0.3 %2,789 0.8 %956 0.3 %
     Net sales$119,398 100.0 %$93,152 100.0 %$346,205 100.0 %$294,993 100.0 %
____________
(1)Includes all beverages other than roasted coffee, including frozen liquid coffee, and iced and hot tea, including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and concentrated and ready-to drink cold brew and iced coffee.
The Company does not have any material contract assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2022. Receivables from contracts with customers are included in “Accounts receivable, net” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at the amount recorded at inception until converted. The Company may mandatorily convert all but not a portion of the Series A Preferred Stock one yearsheets. At March 31, 2022 and June 30, 2021, “Accounts receivable, net” included, $45.9 million and $37.2 million, respectively, in receivables from the date of issue. The holder may convert 20%, 30% and 50%, of the Series A Preferred Stock at the end of the first, second and third year, respectively, from the date of issue. Series A Preferred Stock cannot be sold or transferred by the holder for a period of three years from the date of issue,contracts with the exception of transfer by holder, not for value, or to the holder’s shareholder.customers.

Note 21.20. Commitments and Contingencies
For a detailed discussion about the Company’s commitments and contingencies, see Note 23, “Commitments20, “Commitments and Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statementsContingencies” in the 2017Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2021 Form 10-K. During the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, other than the following, or as otherwise disclosed herein, there were no material changes in the Company’s commitments and contingencies.
New Facility Construction and Equipment Contracts
At December 31, 2017, the Company had committed to purchase additional equipment for the New Facility totaling $6.3 million.
Borrowings Under Revolving Credit Facility
At December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $84.4 million under its Revolving Facility, as compared to outstanding borrowings of $27.6 million at June 30, 2017. The increase in outstanding borrowings in the six months ended December 31, 2017 included $39.5 million to fund the cash paid at closing for the purchase of the Boyd Business and the initial Company obligations under the post-closing transition services agreement.
Non-cancelable Purchase OrdersCommitments
As of DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, the Company had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling $55.3$87.0 million under fixed-price contracts, and $19.4 million in inventory and other purchases totaling $12.9 million under non-cancelable purchase orders.
Legal Proceedings
Council for Education and Research on Toxics (“CERT”) v. Brad Berry Company Ltd., et al., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles
On August 31, 2012, CERT filed an amendment to a private enforcement action adding a number of companies as defendants, including CBI,the Company’s subsidiary, Coffee Bean International, Inc., which sellsells coffee in California.California under the State of California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (“Prop 65”). The suit alleges that the defendants have failed to issue clear and reasonable warnings in accordance with PropositionProp 65 that the coffee they produce, distribute, and sell contains acrylamide. This lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”). CERT has demandedalleges that the alleged violators remove acrylamide fromCompany and the other defendants failed to provide warnings for their coffee or provide Proposition 65products of exposure to the chemical acrylamide as required under Prop 65. Plaintiff seeks equitable relief, including providing warnings on theirto consumers of coffee products, and payas well as civil penalties in the amount of the statutory maximum of $2,500 per day for each and every violation while they are inper violation of PropositionProp 65. The Plaintiff asserts that every consumed cup of coffee, absent a compliant warning, is equivalent to a violation under Prop 65.
The Company, as part of a joint defense group (“JDG”) organized to defend against the lawsuit, disputes the claims of CERT. Acrylamide is not added to coffee but is present in all coffee in small amounts (parts per billion) as a byproduct of the coffee bean roasting process. Acrylamide is produced naturally in connection with the heating of many foods, especially starchy foods, and is believed to be caused by the Maillard reaction, though it has also been found in unheated foods such as olives. With respect to coffee, acrylamide is produced when coffee beans are heated during the roasting process-it is the roasting itself that produces the acrylamide. While there has been a significant amount of research concerning proposals for
23

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)








treatments and other processes aimed at reducing acrylamide content of different types of foods, to our knowledge there is currently no known strategy for reducing acrylamide in coffee without negatively impacting the sensorial properties of the product.
The Company has joined a Joint Defense Group, or JDG, and, along with the other co-defendants, has answered the complaint, denying, generally, the allegationsasserted multiple affirmative defenses. Trial of the complaint, including the claimed violation of Proposition 65 and further denying CERT’s right to any relief or damages, including the right to require a warning on products. The Joint Defense Group contends that based on proper scientific analysis and proper applicationfirst phase of the standards set forth in Proposition 65, exposures to acrylamide from the coffee products pose no significant risk of cancer and, thus, these exposures are exempt from Proposition 65’s warning requirement.
To date, the pleadings stage of the case has been completed. The Court has phased trial so that the “no significant risk level” defense, the First Amendment defense, and the preemption defense will be tried first. Fact discovery and expert

Farmer Bros. Co.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)


discovery on these “Phase 1” defenses have been completed, and the parties filed trial briefs. Trial commenced on September 8, 2014, and testimony completed on November 4, 2014, for thewas limited to three Phase 1 defenses.
Following final trial briefing, the Court heard, on April 9, 2015, final arguments on the Phase 1 issues.affirmative defenses shared by all defendants. On September 1, 2015, the Court ruled againsttrial court issued a final ruling adverse to defendants on all Phase 1 defenses. Trial of the JDGsecond phase of the case commenced in the fall of 2017. On May 7, 2018, the trial court issued a ruling adverse to defendants on the Phase 1 affirmative defenses.2 defense, the Company's last remaining defense to liability. On June 22, 2018, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) proposed a new regulation clarifying that cancer warnings are not required for coffee under Proposition 65. The JDG received permissioncase was set to file an interlocutory appeal, which was filed by writ petitionproceed to a third phase trial on damages, remedies and attorneys' fees on October 14, 2015. 15, 2018. However, on October 12, 2018, the California Court of Appeal granted the “defendants” request for a stay of the Phase 3 trial.
On January 14, 2016,June 3, 2019, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) approved the coffee exemption regulation. The regulation became effective on October 1, 2019. On June 24, 2019, the Court of Appeals deniedAppeal lifted the stay of the litigation. A status conference was held on July 11, 2019. The Court granted the JDG’s writ petition thereby denying the interlocutory appeal so that the case stays with the trial court.
On February 16, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a motion for summary adjudication arguing that based upon facts that had been stipulated byleave to amend its answers to add the JDG, the Plaintiff had proven its prima facie case and all that remains iscoffee exemption regulation as a determination of whether any affirmative defenses are available to Defendants. On March 16, 2016,defense. Concurrently, the Court reinstateddenied CERT’s motion to add OEHHA as a party but granted CERT’s motions to complete the stay onadministrative record with respect to the exemption and to undertake certain third party discovery. A status conference was held November 12, 2019 to discuss discovery for all parties exceptissues and dispositive motions. Plaintiff’s motion to compel OEHHA to add documents to the rulemaking file for the four largest defendants. Followingnew coffee exemption regulation was denied. CERT continued to pursue third-party discovery with plans to file motions to compel appearances of proposed deponents. These motions, along with CERT’s eight summary judgment motions, were heard at a January 21, 2020 hearing on April 20, 2016,where the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication on its prima facie case. Plaintiff fileddenied several of CERT’s discovery requests. The JDG’s reply in support of its motion for summary adjudication of affirmatives defenses on May 16, 2016. At the August 19, 2016 hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication (and the JDG’s opposition),judgment was due to the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, thus maintainingon the ability ofMarch 16, 2020 however, on March 17, 2020, notice was given that the JDGCourt was rescheduling the hearings set for March 23, 2020. Due to defend the issues at trial. On October 7, 2016,COVID 19 restrictions, the Court continued the Plaintiff’shearing on the nine motions until July 16, 2020. At the hearing, the Court denied three of CERT’s motions for summary adjudication that challenged the OEHHA rulemaking, and rescheduled the balance of the pending motions for August 10, 2020. Subsequent to the hearing on January 21, 2020, Plaintiff made broad discovery requests against each of the defendants in hopes of opening up a third round of discovery. The discovery focuses on “additives to” and “flavorings” in coffee. The JDG has responded to the discovery requests but Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel further answers to discovery and production of documents.
At the August 10, 2020 hearing, the Court denied multiple motions by the Plaintiffs for summary adjudication. The hearing on the remaining motions was scheduled for August 25, 2020 and at that hearing, the Court denied CERT’s motion for preliminary injunction untilsummary judgment and granted the trialJDG’s motion for Phase 2.summary judgment, noting that the discovery and claims regarding additives were outside the scope of this case. Notice of Judgment in favor of defendants was entered on October 6, 2020.
InOn November 2016,20, 2020, CERT filed an appeal with the parties pursued mediation, but were not ableSuperior Court of California. On January 29, 2021, CERT filed another appeal with the Superior Court of California. On April 9, 2021, CERT filed it’s opening brief on the first appeal. The Company filed its responsive brief on August 27, 2021. CERT’s response was filed on November 15, 2021. With respect to resolveCERT’s second appeal, the dispute.
In December 2016, discovery resumed for all defendants. Depositions of “person most knowledgeable” witnesses for each defendantCompany’s Respondent Brief was filed on November 18, 2021. CERT’s reply in the JDG commenced in late December and proceeded through early 2017, followed by new interrogatories served uponsecond appeal was filed February 4, 2022. The Company believes that the defendants. The Court set a fact and discovery cutoff of May 31, 2017 and an expert discovery cutoff of August 4, 2017. Depositions of expert witnesses were completed by the end of July. On July 6, 2017, the Court held hearings on a number of discovery motions and denied Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions as to all the defendants.
At a final case management conference on August 21, 2017 the Court set August 31, 2017 as the new trial date for Phase 2, though later changed the starting date for trial to September 5, 2017. The Court elected to break up trial for Phase 2 into two segments, the first focused on liability and the second on remedies. After 14 days at trial, both sides rested on the liability segment, and the Court set a date of November 21, 2017 for the hearing for all evidentiary issues related to this liability segment. The Court also set deadlines for evidentiary motions, issues for oral argument, and oppositions to motions. This hearing date was subsequently moved to January 19, 2018. The Court has indicatedlikelihood that following the January 19, 2018 hearing it will schedule another hearing to announce its decision on the liability phase of the trial. Based upon the Court’s decision on the liability phase, if there is a remedies phase, then the remedies phase would commence later in 2018.
At this time, the Company will ultimately incur a material loss in connection with this litigation is not able to predict the probability of the outcome or estimate of loss, if any, related to this matter. less than reasonably possible.
The Company is a party to various other pending legal and administrative proceedings. It is management’s opinion that the outcome of such proceedings will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 22. Subsequent Event21. Sales of Assets
On February 6, 2018,Sale of Branch Property
During the nine months ended March 31, 2022, the Company entered into an amendment tocompleted the lease for its Portland, Oregon production and distribution facility. Pursuant to the lease amendment, the termsale of the lease is extended for 10 years, commencing on October 1, 2018 and expiring on September 30, 2028, with options to renew up to an additional 10 years. The aggregatefollowing branch properties, none of the future minimum operating lease payments over the 10-year lease term is $8.7 million.which were leased back:

(In thousands)
Name of Branch PropertyDate SoldSales PriceNet ProceedsGain on Sale
Santa Ana, California7/2/2021$4,299 $4,072 $3,571 
Santa Fe Springs, California7/7/20212,650 2,507 1,509 
San Antonio, Texas11/2/2021898 820 729 




24


Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Certain statements contained in thisThis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are not based on historical fact and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws and regulations. These statements are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and observations of future events and include any statements that do not directly relate to any historical or current fact; actual results may differ materially due in part to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 filedother documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”(“SEC”) contain forward-looking statements that are based on September 28, 2017.current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about us, our future performance, our financial condition, our products, our business strategy, our beliefs and our management’s assumptions. In addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking statements in press releases or written statements, or in our communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, webcasts, phone calls and conference calls. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words like “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “expects,” “plans,” “believes,” “intends,” “will,” “could,” “may,” “assumes” and other words of similar meaning. OwingThese statements are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions, estimates and observations of future events based on information available to our management at the time the statements are made and include any statements that do not relate to any historical or current fact. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and they involve certain risks, uncertainties inherent in forward-looking statements, actualand assumptions that are difficult to predict. Actual outcomes and results couldmay differ materially from thosewhat is expressed, implied or forecast by our forward-looking statements due in part to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions set forth in forward-looking statements. We intend these forward-looking statements to speak only atPart I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the timefiscal year ended June 30, 2021 filed with the SEC on September 10, 2021 (the “2021 Form 10-K”) and Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this report and do not undertakeother factors described from time to update or revise these statements as more information becomes available except as required under federal securities laws andtime in our filings with the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the duration and magnitude of the disruption to our business and customers from the COVID-19 pandemic (including the effects of emerging and novel variants of the virus and any virus containment measures such as stay-at-home orders or government mandates) and severe winter weather, levels of consumer confidence in national and local economic business conditions, the duration and magnitude of the pandemic’s impact on labor conditions, the success of our strategy to recover from the Corporate Relocation Plan,effects of the timing andpandemic, the success of implementationour turnaround strategy, the execution of our five strategic initiatives, the DSD Restructuring Plan, the Company’s success in consummating acquisitions and integrating acquired businesses,impact of capital improvement projects, the adequacy and availability of capital resources to fund the Company’sour existing and planned business operations and the Company’sour capital expenditure requirements, the relative effectiveness of compensation-based employee incentives in causing improvements in Companyour performance, the capacity to meet the demands of our large national account customers, the extent of execution of plans for the growth of Companyour business and achievement of financial metrics related to those plans, theour success of the Companyin retaining and/or attracting qualified employees, our success in adapting to retain and/or attract qualified employees,technology and new commerce channels, the effect of the capital markets as well as other external factors on stockholder value, fluctuations in availability and cost of green coffee, competition, organizational changes, the effectiveness of our hedging strategies in reducing price and interest rate risk, changes in consumer preferences, our ability to provide sustainability in ways that do not materially impair profitability, changes in the strength of the economy, including any effects from inflation, business conditions in the coffee industry and food industry in general, our continued success in attracting new customers, variances from budgeted sales mix and growth rates, weather and special or unusual events, as well as other risks described in this reportQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other factors described from time to time in our filings with the SEC. The results
Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of operations for the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicativeactual results. Any or all of the results thatforward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and any other public statement made by us, including by our management, may turn out to be expectedincorrect. We are including this cautionary note to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future period.events, changes in assumptions or otherwise, except as required under federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the SEC.

OverviewOur Business
We are a nationalleading coffee roaster, wholesaler and distributor of coffee, tea and culinaryother allied products manufactured under supply agreements, under our owned brands, as well as under private labels on behalf of certain customers. We were founded in 1912, incorporated in California in 1923, and reincorporated in Delaware in 2004. Our principal office is located in Northlake, Texas. We operate in one business segment.
We serve a wide variety of customers, from small independent restaurants and foodservice operators to large institutional buyers like restaurants, department and convenience store chains,retailers, hotels, casinos, healthcare facilities, and gourmet coffee houses, as well as grocery chains with private brand and consumer brandedconsumer-branded coffee and tea products.products, and foodservice distributors. Through our sustainability, stewardship, environmental efforts, and leadership we are not only committed to serving the finest products available, considering the cost needs of the customer, but also insist on their sustainable cultivation, manufacture and distribution whenever possible.
25


Our product categories consist of a robust line of roast and ground coffee, including organic, Direct Trade, DirectProject D.I.R.E.C.T., Fair Trade Verified Sustainable (“DTVS”)Certified™ ® and other sustainably-produced offerings; frozen liquid coffee; flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas;teas, including organic and Rainforest Alliance Certified™; culinary products including gelatinspremium spices, pancake and puddings, soup bases, dressings,biscuit mixes, gravy and sauce mixes, pancakesoup bases, dressings, syrups and biscuit mixes, jellies and preserves,sauces, and coffee-related products such as coffee filters, cups, sugar and creamers; spices; and other beverages including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and other blender-based beverages and concentrated and ready-to-drink cold brew and iced coffee. We offer a comprehensive approach to our customers by providing not only a breadth of high-quality products, but also value-addedvalue added services such as market insight, beverage planning, and equipment placement and service.
We operate production facilities in Northlake, Texas (the “New Facility”); Houston, Texas; Portland, Oregon; and Hillsboro, Oregon. Distribution takes place out of the New Facility,We distribute our products from our Northlake, Texas, Portland, Oregon and Hillsboro, Oregon production facilities, as well as separate distribution centers in Portland, Oregon; Northlake, Illinois; Moonachie, New Jersey; and Scottsdale, Arizona. We commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. We began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
Rialto, California. Our products reach our customers primarily in two ways: through our nationwide Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”)DSD network of 449238 delivery routes and 11190 branch warehouses as of DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, or direct-shipped via common carriers


or third-party distributors. DSD sales are primarily made “off-truck” to our customers at their places of business. We operate a large fleet of trucks and other vehicles to distribute and deliver our products through our DSD network, and we rely on third-party logistics3PL service providers for our long-haul distribution.
Corporate Relocation
In an effort to make the Company more competitive and better positioned to capitalize on growth opportunities, in fiscal 2015 we began the process of relocating our corporate headquarters, product development lab, and manufacturing and distribution operations from Torrance, California (the “Torrance Facility”) to the New Facility (the “Corporate Relocation Plan”). Approximately 350 positions were impacted as a resultImpact of the Torrance Facility closure. We completedCOVID-19 Pandemic on Our Business
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity as the Corporate Relocation Plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.

Recent Developments
Acquisitions
On October 2, 2017, we acquired substantially alleffects of the assetspandemic and certain specified liabilitiesresulting governmental actions have decreased the demand for our products, most notably throughout our DSD network, which consist of Boyd Coffee Company (“Boyd Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus onsmall independent restaurants, hotels, and convenience stores on the West Coast of the United States, in consideration of cash and preferred stock. The acquired business of Boyd Coffee (the “Boyd Business”) is expected to add to our product portfolio, improve growth potential, increase the density and penetration of our distribution footprint, and increase capacity utilization at our production facilities.

In fiscal 2017, we completed two acquisitions. On October 11, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of China Mist Brands, Inc. dba China Mist Tea Company (“China Mist”), a provider of flavored and unflavored iced and hot teas, and on February 7, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee Company, Inc. (“West Coast Coffee”), a coffee roaster and distributor with a focus on thefoodservice operators, large institutional buyers, convenience store grocerychains, hotels, casinos, healthcare facilities, and foodservice channels.distributors. The China Mist acquisition is expectedCOVID-19 pandemic continues to extend our tea product offerings and give ushave a greater presence in the high-growth premium tea industry, while the acquisition of West Coast Coffee is expected to broaden our reach in the Northwestern United States.
See Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition below for further details of thematerial impact of these acquisitions on our financial condition and liquidity, and Note 3, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
DSD Restructuring Plan
As a result of an ongoing operational review of various initiatives within our DSD selling organization, in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we commenced a plan to reorganize our DSD operations in an effort to realign functions into a channel based selling organization, streamline operations, acquire certain channel specific expertise, and improve selling effectiveness and financial results (the “DSD Restructuring Plan”). See Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition—Liquidity—DSD Restructuring Plan, below, and Note 4, Restructuring Plans—Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”) Restructuring Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.

Results of Operations
Financial Highlights
Volume of green coffee pounds processed and sold increased 18.7% and 9.4%, respectively, inrevenues during the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 as2022.
As local and state governments across the country have eased COVID-19 restrictions, and vaccines have become generally available, we have continued to see improved average weekly sales trends. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, our average weekly sales were down 16% compared to the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.
Gross profit increased $10.4 million to $65.5 million inpre-COVID levels, which represents continued improvement from the three months ended December 31, 2017 from $55.1 million2021 and March 31, 2021 when sales were down 17% and 36%, respectively. Although we experienced improvement in several markets this quarter as COVID further recedes, the recovery is slower in certain regions caused by general COVID-19 restrictions across the country.
Although our Direct Ship sales channel was also affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact was significantly less due to the types of customers we serve through this channel. These customers include our retail business and products sold by key grocery stores under their private labels, as well as third party e-commerce platforms, which have been impacted less by the pandemic. For the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. Gross profit2022, our Direct Ship revenues have improved which is mainly driven by recently optimized customer base and recovery of several larger accounts.
Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our revenues, we instituted several initiatives during fiscal 2020 and 2021 to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures to help mitigate the significant negative impact of our revenue decline. In addition to the costs saving initiatives, in fiscal 2021 we repaid our existing senior secured revolving credit facility, and entered into a new senior secured facility composed of a Revolver Credit Facility Agreement and a Term Credit Facility Agreement (the “Credit Facilities”). We believe that the Credit Facilities provide us with increased $8.2 millionflexibility to $114.5 millionproactively manage our working capital and execute our long term strategy, maintain compliance with our financial covenants, lower our cost of borrowing, and preserve financial liquidity to mitigate the impact of the uncertain business environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, while continuing to execute on our strategic initiatives.
The duration and magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the extent of the weaker demand for our products, our financial position, results of operations and liquidity, which could be material, remains uncertain. The ultimate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business will depend on future developments, including the availability and cost of labor, global supply chain disruptions, variants of the virus, and the availability and use of vaccines, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. While we anticipate that our revenue will continue to recover slowly as local, state and national governments ease COVID-19 related restrictions, and vaccines become more widely accepted, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in returning to the sixpre-COVID-19 pandemic levels of revenue or profitability for our fiscal year ending June 30, 2022 (“fiscal 2022”).
For other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10‑K, which is accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. 
26


Summary Overview of Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 Results of Operations
During the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, revenues from $106.3 millionboth our DSD and Direct ship sales channels continued to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our largest DSD revenue declines were in our restaurant, healthcare, hotel and casino channels, while the sixC-store channel was impacted less. However, due to the significant recovery in these channels throughout fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2022, our average weekly DSD sales compared to pre COVID levels improved from down 36% during the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016.2021 to down 16% during the three months ended March 31, 2022.


Our Direct ship channel sales improved 23.7% during the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the prior year period. This was due to the recently optimized customer base and recovery from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by some of our larger Direct ship customers.
Gross margin decreasedimproved 4.2% from 25.6% during the prior year period to 39.1%29.8% during the three months ended March 31, 2022. This improvement was mostly due to the effect of the continued recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic on our DSD channel sales since our DSD channel has higher margins. The increase was also attributable to a decline in our unfavorable production variances and 38.3%, respectively,inventory scrap write-downs due to the closure of our aged Houston, Texas plant during fiscal 2021. These improvements were partially offset by higher freight costs due to global supply chain challenges. The price increases and delivery surcharges implemented across our DSD network beginning in the threesecond quarter of fiscal 2022 helped mitigate the impact of higher supply chain and sixproduct costs.
Operating expenses increased $5.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the prior year period due to a $4.7 million increase in selling expenses and a $0.6 million increase in general and administrative expenses. The increase in selling expenses was primarily due to variable costs, including payroll, associated with the higher sales volumes, as well as operating costs associated with our new distribution center in Rialto, California.
Our capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2022 were $3.0 million, a decrease of $0.1 million compared to the prior year period. This was due to lower investment spending of $1.1 million for several strategic initiatives completed during fiscal 2021, partially offset by higher maintenance capital spend of $0.9 million compared to the prior year period. Our capital expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2022 were $8.9 million, a decline of $3.9 million compared to the prior year period. This was due to lower investment capital of $6.0 million for several strategic initiatives completed during fiscal 2021, partially offset by higher maintenance capital spend of $2.1 million compared to the prior year period. The higher maintenance capital was mainly due to the purchase of coffee brewing equipment for our DSD customers as volumes have improved, as well as small Northlake, Texas plant and IT projects. Several key initiatives in fiscal 2021, including a focus on refurbished coffee brewing equipment to drive cost savings, helped reduce our purchases as DSD sales volumes return.
As of March 31, 2022, the outstanding principal on our Revolver and Term Loan Credit Facilities was $101.1 million, an increase of $10.1 million from December 31, 2017,2021. Our cash balance increased by $6.8 million, from 39.6% and 39.4%, respectively, in the three and six months ended$3.6 million as of December 31, 2016.2021, to $10.4 million as of March 31, 2022.
IncomeAs of March 31, 2022, the outstanding principal on our Credit Facilities was $101.1 million, an increase of $10.1 million from operations was $2.4June 30, 2021. Our cash balance increased by $0.1 million, from $10.3 million as of June 30, 2021, to $10.4 million as of March 31, 2022. These changes were primarily due to higher inventory costs, and $1.2 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to income from operationspayment of $35.9 million and $38.4 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016. Income from operations in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016 included a $37.4 million net gainour fiscal 2021 employee incentive program. These uses of cash were partially offset by cash proceeds from the sale of three branch properties during the Torrance Facility.
Net loss was $(18.8) million, or $(1.13) per common share available to common stockholders, in the threenine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017, compared to net income of $20.1 million, or $1.202022 and realized hedging gains.
27


Financial Data Highlights (in thousands, except per common share available to common stockholders—diluted, in the three months ended December 31, 2016. Net loss was $(19.7) million, or $(1.19) per common share available to common stockholders, in the six months ended December 31, 2017, compared to net income of $21.7 million, or $1.30 per common share available to common stockholders—diluted, in the six months ended December 31, 2016. Net loss in the threedata and six months ended December 31, 2017 included income tax expense of $20.9 million and $20.2 million, respectively, as compared to income tax expense of $13.4 million and $14.5 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.percentages)
 Three Months Ended March 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)Nine Months Ended March 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
20222021Change% Change20222021Change% Change
Income Statement Data:
Net sales$119,398 $93,152 $26,24628.2%$346,205 $294,993 $51,21217.4%
Gross margin29.8 %25.6 %4.2%NM29.5 %24.6 %4.9%NM
Operating expenses as a % of sales33.1 %36.8 %3.7%NM32.4 %35.4 %3.0%NM
Loss from operations$(3,938)$(10,395)$6,45762.1%$(10,290)$(32,004)$21,71467.8%
Net loss$(4,040)$(13,684)$9,64470.5%$(11,884)$(37,680)$25,79668.5%
Operating Data:
Coffee pounds18,797 18,026 7714.3%58,466 60,366 (1,900)(3.1)%
EBITDA(1)$2,577 $(4,800)$7,377153.7%$11,055 $3,391 $7,664226.0%
EBITDA Margin(1)2.2 %(5.2)%7.4%NM3.2 %1.1 %2.1%NM
Adjusted EBITDA(1)$5,021 $(759)$5,780761.5%$13,009 $13,207 $(198)(1.5)%
Adjusted EBITDA Margin(1)4.2 %(0.8)%5.0%NM3.8 %4.5 %(0.7)%NM
Percentage of Total Net Sales By Product Category 
Coffee (Roasted)64.9 %65.2 %(0.3)%(0.5)%64.6 %66.6 %(2.0)%(3.0)%
Tea & Other Beverages (2)17.6 %18.4 %(0.8)%(4.3)%18.2 %17.5 %0.7%4.0%
Culinary11.6 %11.3 %0.3%2.7%11.8 %11.0 %0.8%7.3%
Spices4.8 %4.8 %—%—%4.6 %4.6 %—%—%
Net sales by product category98.9 %99.7 %(0.8)%NM99.2 %99.7 %(0.5)%NM
Delivery Surcharge1.1 %0.3 %0.8%NM0.8 %0.3 %0.5%NM
     Net sales100.0 %100.0 %—%—%100.0 %100.0 %—%—%
Other data:
Capital expenditures related to maintenance$2,985 $2,042 $(943)(46.2)%$7,893 $5,783 $(2,110)(36.5)%
Total capital expenditures3,009 3,133 124 4.0 %8,896 12,769 3,873 30.3 %
Depreciation and amortization expense5,791 6,883 1,092 15.9 %18,119 21,231 3,112 14.7 %
________________
NM - Not Meaningful

(1) EBITDA, decreased (71.7)% to $11.1 million and EBITDA Margin, was 6.6% in the three months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to EBITDA of $39.1 million and EBITDA Margin of 28.1% in the three months ended December 31, 2016. EBITDA decreased (63.6)% to $17.2 million and EBITDA Margin was 5.7% in the six months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to EBITDA of $47.2 million and EBITDA Margin of 17.5% in the six months ended December 31, 2016.*
Adjusted EBITDA increased 15.7% to $12.9 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 7.7% inare non-GAAP financial measures. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measures.
(2) Includes all beverages other than roasted coffee, frozen liquid coffee, and iced and hot tea, including cappuccino, cocoa, granitas, and concentrated and ready-to-drink cold brew and iced coffee.
28


Results of Operations
The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017, as compared2022 and 2021 (in thousands, except percentages):
 Three Months Ended March 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)Nine Months Ended March 31,Favorable (Unfavorable)
20222021Change% Change20222021Change% Change
Net sales$119,398 $93,152 $26,24628.2%$346,205 $294,993 $51,21217.4%
Cost of goods sold83,838 69,274 (14,564)(21.0)%244,197 222,447 (21,750)(9.8)%
Gross profit35,560 23,878 11,68248.9%102,008 72,546 29,46240.6%
Selling expenses27,477 22,767 (4,710)(20.7)%81,505 71,035 (10,470)(14.7)%
General and administrative expenses11,595 11,018 (577)(5.2)%34,796 32,334 (2,462)(7.6)%
Net losses (gains) from sales of assets426 488 62NM(4,003)(62)3,941NM
Impairment of fixed assets— — —%— 1,243 1,243100.0%
Operating expenses39,498 34,273 (5,225)(15.2)%112,298 104,550 (7,748)(7.4)%
Loss from operations(3,938)(10,395)6,45762.1%(10,290)(32,004)21,71467.8%
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense(1,591)(2,993)1,40246.8%(7,106)(9,174)2,06822.5%
Other, net1,579 (356)1,935NM5,790 17,283 (11,493)NM
Total other (expense) income(12)(3,349)3,337NM(1,316)8,109 (9,425)NM
Loss before taxes(3,950)(13,744)9,79471.3%(11,606)(23,895)12,28951.4%
Income tax expense (benefit)90 (60)(150)NM278 13,785 13,507NM
Net loss$(4,040)$(13,684)9,64470.5%$(11,884)$(37,680)25,79668.5%
Less: Cumulative preferred dividends, undeclared and unpaid149 144 (5)(3.5)%444 428 (16)(3.7)%
Net loss available to common stockholders$(4,189)$(13,828)9,63969.7%$(12,328)$(38,108)25,78067.6%
___________
NM - Not Meaningful
Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2022 Compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $11.2 millionThree and Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 8.0% in the three months ended DecemberNine Months Ended March 31, 2016. Adjusted EBITDA increased 0.3% to $22.2 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin was 7.4% in the six months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $22.2 million and Adjusted EBITDA Margin of 8.2% in the six months ended December 31, 2016.*2021
(* EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are non-GAAP financial measures. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Part I, Item 2 of this report for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measures.)
Net Sales
Net sales in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 increased $28.4$26.2 million, or 20.4%28.2%, to $167.4$119.4 million from $139.0$93.2 million in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 due2021. Net sales in the nine months ended March 31, 2022 increased $51.2 million, or 17.4%, to a $17.6$346.2 million from $295.0 million in the nine months ended March 31, 2021. The increase in net sales for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2022 was due to the continued recovery from the impact of roastthe COVID-19 pandemic on both our DSD and groundDirect Ship network, along with price increases and delivery surcharges.
On our DSD network, the increase was driven by improved volume of green coffee a $5.5 million increase in net salesprocessed and sold, along with improved volume of other beverages, a $3.7 million increase in net sales of culinary, products, a $0.8 million increase in net sales of frozen liquid coffee, a $0.4 million increase in net sales ofspice and tea products and a $0.4 millionsold as we continue to experience higher weekly sales volumes compared to prior periods.
On the Direct ship network, increase in net sales of spice products. These changes were primarilywas due to the addition of the Boyd Business which added a total of $26.3 million to net sales as well as the benefit of higher prices to our cost plus customers. Net sales in the three months ended December 31, 2017 included $(0.4) million involumes on Direct ship customers and price decreaseschanges to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer. This was also due to the recently optimized customer base and recovery from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by some of our larger Direct ship customers.
Our Direct ship net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2022 included $8.7 million in price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements. Our direct ship net sales in the three months ended March 31, 2021 included no material price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements.
Our Direct ship net sales in the nine months ended March 31, 2022 included $15.1 million in price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, as compared to $(2.3)$1.6 million in price decreases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the threenine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016.2021.
Net sales in
29


The following table presents the six months ended December 31, 2017 increased $29.6 million, or 11.0%, to $299.1 million from $269.5 million in the six months ended December 31, 2016 due to a $19.2 million increase in net saleseffect of roast and ground coffee, a $4.2 million increase in net sales of other beverages, a $3.6 million increase in net sales of culinary products, a $1.7 million increase in net sales of tea products, a $0.8 million increase in net sales of frozen liquid coffee, and a $0.3 million increase in net sales of spice products. These changes were primarily due to the addition of the Boyd Business which added a total of $26.3 million to net sales as well as the benefit of higher prices to our cost plus customers. Net sales in the six months ended December 31, 2017 included the benefit of $0.5 million in price increases to customers utilizing commodity-based pricing arrangements, where the changes in the green coffee commodity costs are passed on to the customer, as compared to $(6.6) million in price decreases to customers utilizing such arrangements in the six months ended December 31, 2016.


The changes in netunit sales, and unit pricing and product mix in the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 compared to the same periodsperiod in the prior fiscal year were due to the following:
(in millions):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2022 vs. 2021
% of Total Mix ChangeNine Months Ended
March 31,
2022 vs. 2021
% of Total Mix Change
(In millions)
Three Months Ended
December 31, 2017 vs. 2016
 
Six Months Ended
December 31,
2017 vs. 2016
Effect of change in unit sales$29.7
 $18.9
Effect of change in unit sales$5.8 22.1 %$(5.6)(10.9)%
Effect of pricing and product mix changes(1.3) 10.7
Effect of pricing and product mix changes20.4 77.9 %56.8 110.9 %
Total increase in net sales$28.4
 $29.6
Total increase in net sales$26.2 100.0 %$51.2 100.0 %
Unit sales increased 21.6%5.1% and average unit price increased by 21.9% in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, while average unit price decreased by (1.0)% resulting in an increase in our net sales of 20.4%28.2%. The increase in unitUnit sales was primarily due to a 76.9% increase in unit sales of other beverages, which accounted for approximately 13% of total net sales, a 53.2% increase in unit sales of frozen liquid coffee products, which accounted for approximately 6% of total net sales, a 24.8% increase in unit sales of culinary products, which accounted for approximately 10% of total net sales,decreased 1.6% and a 18.7% increase in unit sales of roast and ground coffee products, which accounted for approximately 62% of total net sales. Averageaverage unit price decreased (1.0)% primarily due toincreased by 19.3% in the addition of the Boyd Business. In the threenine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017, we processed and sold approximately 29.1 million pounds of green coffee as compared to approximately 24.5 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the three months ended December 31, 2016. There were no new product category introductions in the three months ended December 31, 2017 or 2016 which had a material impact on our net sales.
Unit sales increased 6.7% in the six months ended December 31, 20172022 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, and average unit price increased by 3.9% resulting in an increase in our net sales of 11.0%17.4%. The increase in unit sales was primarily due to a 41.9% increase in unit sales of other beverages, which accounted for approximately 11% of total net sales, a 26.0% increase in unit sales of frozen liquid coffee products, which accounted for approximately 6% of total net sales, and a 9.4% increase in unit sales of roast and ground coffee which accounted for approximately 63% of total net sales, offset by a (22.8)% decrease in unit sales of culinary products, which accounted for approximately 10% of total net sales, and a (21.6)% decrease in unit sales of spice products, which accounted for approximately 4% of total net sales. Average unit price increased primarilyduring three and nine months ended March 31, 2022 due to price increases on substantially alla higher mix of product sold via our products with the exception of coffee (frozen liquid). In the six months ended December 31, 2017, we processed and sold approximately 52.3 million pounds of green coffeeDSD network versus Direct ship, as compared to approximately 47.8 million pounds of green coffee processed and sold in the six months ended December 31, 2016.Direct ship has a lower average unit price. There were no new product category introductions in the six months ended December 31, 2017 or 2016 which had a material impact on our net sales.
The following tables present net sales aggregated by product category for the respective periods indicated:
  Three Months Ended December 31,
  2017 2016
(In thousands) $ % of total $ % of total
Net Sales by Product Category:        
Coffee (Roast & Ground) $104,457
 62% $86,838
 62%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid) 9,326
 6% 8,484
 6%
Tea (Iced & Hot) 7,751
 5% 7,341
 5%
Culinary 17,376
 10% 13,689
 10%
Spice 6,333
 4% 5,966
 4%
Other beverages(1) 21,429
 13% 15,976
 12%
     Net sales by product category 166,672
 100% 138,294
 99%
Fuel surcharge 694
 % 731
 1%
     Net sales $167,366
 100% $139,025
 100%
____________
(1) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.



  Six Months Ended December 31,
  2017 2016
(In thousands) $ % of total $ % of total
Net Sales by Product Category:        
Coffee (Roast & Ground) $187,340
 63% $168,180
 62%
Coffee (Frozen Liquid) 17,150
 6% 16,395
 6%
Tea (Iced & Hot) 15,423
 5% 13,709
 5%
Culinary 31,139
 10% 27,499
 10%
Spice 12,607
 4% 12,355
 5%
Other beverages(1) 34,035
 11% 29,884
 11%
     Net sales by product category 297,694
 99% 268,022
 99%
Fuel surcharge 1,385
 1% 1,491
 1%
     Net sales $299,079
 100% $269,513
 100%
____________
(1) Includes all beverages other than coffee and tea.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold in the three months ended December 31, 2017 increased $17.9 million, or 21.3%, to $101.8 million, or 60.9% of net sales, from $83.9 million, or 60.4% of net sales in the three and nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily due to the addition of the Boyd Business making up $16.2 million of the increase. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in the three months ended December 31, 2017 increased primarily due to higher manufacturing costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility, higher cost of green coffee, and the absence of the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the three months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. In the three months ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $0.8 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold which increased income before taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2016 by $0.8 million. In the three months ended December 31, 2017, we recorded no expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold.
Cost of goods sold in the six months ended December 31, 2017 increased $21.3 million,2022 or 13.1%, to $184.6 million, or 61.7% of net sales, from $163.2 million, or 60.6% of net sales, in the six months ended December 31, 2016. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily due to the addition of the Boyd Business making up $16.2 million of the increase. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales in the six months ended December 31, 2017 increased primarily due to higher manufacturing costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility, higher cost of green coffee, and the absence of the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the six months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. In the six months ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $1.7 million in expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold which increased income before taxes for the six months ended December 31, 2016 by $1.7 million. In the six months ended December 31, 2017, we recorded no expected beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in cost of goods sold.


2021.
Gross Profit
Gross profit in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 increased $10.4$11.7 million, or 18.9%48.9%, to $65.5$35.6 million from $55.1$23.9 million in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and gross2021. Gross margin decreasedincreased to 39.1%29.8% in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 from 39.6%25.6% in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. This increase in gross profit was primarily due to the addition of the Boyd Business, while the decrease in gross margin was primarily due to the addition of the Boyd Business carrying a slightly lower gross margin, higher manufacturing costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility, and the absence of the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the three months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.2021.
Gross profit in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 increased $8.2$29.5 million, or 7.7%40.6%, to $114.5$102.0 million from $106.3$72.5 million in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016 and gross2021. Gross margin decreasedincreased to 38.3%29.5% in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 from 39.4%24.6% in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. This2021.
The increase in gross profit in the current year was primarily driven by higher net sales on both the DSD and Direct ship network, partially offset by higher freight costs due to global supply chain challenges. Gross margin improved due to the additioneffect of the Boyd Business, while the decreasecontinued recovery from COVID-19 on our DSD channel sales since our DSD channel has higher margins. The increase was also attributable to a decline in gross margin was primarilyour unfavorable production variances and inventory scrap write-downs due to the additionclosure of our aged Houston, Texas plant during fiscal 2021. The price increases and delivery surcharges implemented across our DSD network during the Boyd Business carrying a slightly lower gross margin,second quarter of fiscal 2022 helped mitigate the impact of higher manufacturing costs associated with the production operations in the New Facility,supply chain and the absence of the beneficial effect of the liquidation of LIFO inventory quantities in the six months ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.product costs.
Operating Expenses
In the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, operating expenses increased $43.9$5.2 million to $39.5 million, or 228.8%, to $63.1 million, or 37.7%33.1% of net sales, from $19.2$34.3 million, or 13.8%36.8% of net sales in the three months ended December 31, 2016, primarilyprior year period. This increase was due to the effect of the recognition of $37.4 million in net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility in the three months ended December 31, 2016, a $10.2$4.7 million increase in selling expenses and a $0.1$0.6 million increase in general and administrative expenses. The increase in operating expenses was partially offset by a $(3.8) million decrease in restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan. Restructuring and other transition expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2017 included expenses associated with the DSD Restructuring Plan.
Selling expenses increased $10.2 million in the three months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily due to $5.9 million and $0.8 million in selling expenses from the addition of the Boyd Business and West Coast Coffee, respectively, exclusive of their related depreciation and amortization expense, and $1.4 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to $2.6 million and $0.2 million in general and administrative expenses from the addition of the Boyd Business and West Coast Coffee, exclusive of their related depreciation and amortization expense, $1.0 million in acquisition and integration costs and $0.3 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by the absence of $3.7 million in non-recurring 2016 proxy contest expenses incurred in the three months ended December 31, 2016.
Restructuring and other transition expenses in the three months ended December 31, 2017 decreased $(3.8) million, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to the absence of expenses related to our Corporate Relocation Plan, partially offset by $0.1 million in costs incurred in connection with the DSD Restructuring Plan in the three months ended December 31, 2017.
In the threenine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 and 2016 net gains from sale of spice assets included $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, in earnout.
In the six months ended December 31, 2017,2022, operating expenses increased $45.5$7.7 million to $112.3 million, or 67.0%, to $113.3 million or 37.9%32.4% of net sales, from $67.9$104.6 million, or 25.2%35.4% of net sales in the six months ended December 31, 2016, primarilyprior year period. This increase was due to the effect of the recognition of $37.4 million in net gain from the sale of the Torrance Facility in the six months ended December 31, 2016, a $10.7$10.5 million increase in selling expenses and a $2.5 million increase in general and administrative expenses, partially offset by a $1.2 million lower fixed assets impairment and a $1.6$3.9 million reductionincrease in net gains from the sales of other assets.assets due to the sale of three branch properties during the nine months ended March 31, 2022. The increase in operatingselling expenses during the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was partially offset by a $(6.7) million decrease in restructuring and other transition expensesprimarily due to variable costs, including payroll, associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan. Restructuringhigher sales volumes, as well as operating costs associated with our new distribution center in Rialto, California. The increase in general and other transitionadministrative expenses induring the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 also included expenses associated with the DSD Restructuring Plan.
Selling expenses increased $10.7 million in the six months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year,2022 was primarily due to $5.9 millionpayroll and $1.5 million in selling expenses from the addition of the Boyd


Business and West Coast Coffee, respectively, exclusive of theirthird party costs related depreciation and amortization expense and $2.1 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense.
General and administrative expenses increased $2.5 million in the six months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to $3.4 million in acquisition and integration costs, $2.6 million in expenses from the addition of the Boyd Business, and $1.1 million in higher depreciation and amortization expense,several supply chain optimization initiatives, partially offset by the absence of $5.0 million in non-recurring 2016 proxy contest expenses incurred in the six months ended December 31, 2016.
Restructuring and other transition expenses in the six months ended December 31, 2017 decreased $(6.7) million, as compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year primarily due to the absence of expenses related to our Corporate Relocation Plan, partially offset by $0.3 million inone-time severance costs incurred in connection with the DSD Restructuring Plan in the six months ended December 31, 2017.
In each of the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 net gains from sale of spice assets included $0.5 million in earnout.
Income from Operations
Income from operations in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 was $2.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, as compared to $35.9 million and $38.4 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.
Income from operations in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year was primarily driven by lower net gains from sales of assets, including $37.4 million in net gains from the sale of the Torrance Facility recognized in the prior year periods,period. The increase in payroll in both and higher selling expenses and higher general and administrative expenses primarilyare predominately due to the additionexpiration of the Boyd Business, acquisitiontemporary 15% reduction in base salaries and integration costs, and higher depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by higher gross profit and lower restructuring and other transition expenses associated with the Corporate Relocation Plan.expiration of the 401(k) cash match suspension under the Farmer Bros. Co. 401(k) Plan, which were both cost saving actions implemented in fiscal 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Total Other (Expense) Income
Total other (expense) income in the three months ended March 31, 2022 decreased $3.3 million or 99.6% to $12.0 thousand of expense compared to $3.3 million of expense in the three and six months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172021. This change was $(0.3) million and $(0.7) million, respectively, compared to $(2.4) million and $(2.2) million in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016. The changes in total other expense in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 were primarily a result of liquidating substantially all of our investment in preferred securities in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 to fund expenditures associated with our New Facility, and lower mark-to-market losses on coffee-related derivative instruments, offset by higher interest expense as compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year.
Netand higher gains on investments in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 were $16,000 and $7,000, respectively, as compared to net losses on investments of $(1.3) million and $(1.1) million in the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year. Net losses on coffee-related derivative instruments in the three and sixcurrent year period.
Total other (expense) income in the nine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 were $(0.2)2022 increased $9.4 million and $(0.1)or 116.2% to $1.3 million respectively,of expense compared to $(1.2)$8.1 million of income in the nine months ended March 31, 2021. This change was
30


primarily a result of the absence of the gains due to the postretirement benefit curtailment in the prior year, partially offset by lower interest expense and higher gains on coffee-related derivative instruments in the current year.
Interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2022 decreased $1.4 million to $1.6 million from $3.0 million in each of the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year period. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the lower interest rate on our Credit Facilities, and favorable interest rate swap activity.
Interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2022 decreased $2.1 million to $7.1 million from $9.2 million in the prior year period. The decrease in interest expense was principally due to the lower interest rate on our Credit Facilities, and lower losses on our interest rate swap.
Other, net in the three months ended March 31, 2022 increased by $1.9 million to income of $1.6 million compared to expense of $0.3 million in the prior year period. Other, net in the nine months ended March 31, 2022 decreased by $11.5 million to income of $5.8 million compared to income of $17.3 million in the prior year period. The decrease was primarily a result of lower amortized gains on our terminated postretirement medical benefit plan, partially offset by higher mark-to-market net lossesgains on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges.
Interest expense in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017, was $(0.9) million and $(1.4) million, respectively, as compared to $(0.5) million and $(0.9) million, respectively, in the comparable periods of the prior fiscal year. The higher interest expense in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to higher outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility.
Income Taxes
In the three and six months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022 and March 31, 2021 , we recorded income tax expense of $20.9$0.1 million and $20.2income tax benefit of $0.1 million, respectively, compared to $13.4respectively. In the nine months ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, we recorded income tax expense of $0.3 million and $14.5$13.8 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended December 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2017, our net deferred tax assets totaled $63.1 million.  In the six months ended December 31, 2017, our net deferred tax assets decreased by $17.5 million to $45.6 million. These changes are primarily the result of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 effective December 22, 2017.respectively. See Note 1816, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Net Loss
As a result of the foregoing factors, net loss was $(18.8) million, or $(1.13) per common share available to common stockholders, in the three months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to net income of $20.1 million, or $1.20 per common share available to common stockholders—diluted, in the three months ended December 31, 2016. Net loss was $(19.7) million, or $(1.19) per common share available to common stockholders, in the six months ended December 31, 2017 as compared to net income of $21.7 million, or $1.30 per common share available to common stockholders—diluted, in the six months ended December 31, 2016.


Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to net (loss) incomeloss determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use the following non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our operating performance:
Non-GAAP net (loss) income” EBITDA” is defined as net (loss) incomeloss excluding the impact of:
restructuring and other transition expenses;
net gains and losses from sales of assets;
non-cash income tax expense (benefit), including the release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets;expense;
non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses;
non-cash interest expense accrued on the Torrance Facility sale-leaseback financing obligation;
acquisition and integration costs;
and including the impact of:
income taxes on non-GAAP adjustments.
“Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share” is defined as Non-GAAP net (loss) income divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, inclusive of the dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
“EBITDA” is defined as net (loss) income excluding the impact of:
income taxes;
interest expense; and
depreciation and amortization expense.
“EBITDA Margin” is defined as EBITDA expressed as a percentage of net sales.
“Adjusted EBITDA” is defined as net (loss) income excluding the impact of:
income taxes;tax expense;
interest expense;
(loss) income from short-term investments;
depreciation and amortization expense;
ESOP and share-based compensation expense;
non-cash impairment losses;
non-cash pension withdrawal expense;
other similar non-cash expenses;
restructuring and other transition expenses;
strategic initiatives;
impairment of fixed assets;
non-recurring costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and 2021 severe winter weather;
net gains and losses from sales of assets; and
non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses; andseverance costs.
acquisition and integration costs.
“Adjusted EBITDA Margin” is defined as Adjusted EBITDA expressed as a percentage of net sales.
RestructuringFor purposes of calculating EBITDA and other transition expenses are expenses that are directly attributable to (i) the Corporate Relocation Plan, consisting primarily of employee retentionEBITDA Margin and separation benefits, facility-related costs and other related costs such as travel, legal, consulting and other professional services; and (ii) beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the DSD Restructuring Plan, consisting primarily of severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we modified the calculation of Non-GAAP net (loss) income and Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share (i) to exclude non-recurring expenses for legal and other professional services incurred in connection with the 2016 proxy contest that were in excess of the level of expenses normally incurred for an annual meeting of stockholders (“2016 proxy contest-related expenses”) and non-cash interest expense accrued on the


Torrance Facility sale-leaseback financing obligation which has been included in the computation of the gain on sale upon conclusion of the leaseback arrangement, and (ii) to include income tax expense (benefit) on the non-GAAP adjustments based on the Company’s applicable marginal tax rate. We also modified Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, to exclude 2016 proxy contest-related expenses. These modifications towe have not adjusted for the impact of interest expense on our pension and postretirement benefit plans.
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures were made because such expenses are not reflectiveprovide a useful measure of ourthe Company’s operating results, a meaningful comparison with historical results and with the results of other companies, and insight into the Company’s ongoing operating resultsperformance. Further, management utilizes these measures, in addition to GAAP measures, when evaluating and adjusting for them will help investors with comparability of our results.comparing the Company’s operating performance against internal financial forecasts and budgets.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017 and for all periods presented, we include EBITDA in our non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons from period to period by isolating the effects of certain items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. These potential differences may be caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses)
31


and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense). We also present EBITDA and EBITDA Margin because (i) we believe that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry, (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness, and (iii) we use these measures internally as benchmarks to compare our performance to that of our competitors.
Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2017, we modified the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to exclude (loss) income from our short-term investments because we believe excluding (loss) income generated from our investment portfolio is a measure more reflective of our operating results. The historical presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin was recast to be comparable to the current period presentation.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we modified the calculation of Non-GAAP net (loss) income, Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin to exclude acquisition and integration costs. Acquisition and integration costs include legal expenses, consulting expenses and internal costs associated with acquisitions and integration of those acquisitions. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 acquisition and integration costs were significant and, we believe, excluding them will help investors to better understand our operating results and more accurately compare them across periods. We have not adjusted the historical presentation of Non-GAAP net (loss) income, Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin because acquisition and integration costs in prior periods were not material to the Company’s results of operations.
We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide a useful measure of the Company’s operating results, a meaningful comparison with historical results and with the results of other companies, and insight into the Company’s ongoing operating performance. Further, management utilizes these measures, in addition to GAAP measures, when evaluating and comparing the Company’s operating performance against internal financial forecasts and budgets.
Non-GAAP net (loss) income, Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share, EBITDA, EBITDA Margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We do not intend for non-GAAP financial measures to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for other measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net loss to EBITDA (unaudited): 

Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Net loss, as reported$(4,040)$(13,684)$(11,884)$(37,680)
Income tax expense (benefit)90 (60)278 13,785 
Interest expense (1)736 2,061 4,542 6,055 
Depreciation and amortization expense5,791 6,883 18,119 21,231 
EBITDA$2,577 $(4,800)$11,055 $3,391 
EBITDA Margin2.2 %(5.2)%3.2 %1.1 %
____________
(1) Excludes interest expense related to pension plans and postretirement benefit plans.
Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net (loss) income to Non-GAAP net (loss) income and reported net (loss) income per common share-diluted to Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share (unaudited):
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net (loss) income, as reported $(18,768) $20,076
 $(19,746) $21,694
Restructuring and other transition expenses 139
 3,965
 259
 6,995
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility 
 (37,449) 
 (37,449)
Net gains from sale of spice assets (395) (334) (545) (492)
Net losses (gains) from sales of other assets 91
 114
 144
 (1,439)
Non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses 
 3,719
 
 4,990
Interest expense on sale-leaseback financing obligation 
 371
 
 681
Acquisition and integration costs 972
 
 3,382
 
Income tax (benefit) expense on non-GAAP adjustments (258) 11,549
 (1,037) 10,418
Non-GAAP net (loss) income $(18,219) $2,011
 $(17,543) $5,398
         
Net (loss) income per common share—diluted, as reported $(1.12) $1.20
 $(1.18) $1.30
Impact of restructuring and other transition expenses $0.01
 $0.24
 $0.02
 $0.42
Impact of net gain from sale of Torrance Facility $
 $(2.24) $
 $(2.24)
Impact of net gains from sale of spice assets $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.03) $(0.03)
Impact of net losses (gains) from sales of other assets $0.01
 $0.01
 $0.01
 $(0.09)
Impact of non-recurring 2016 proxy contest-related expenses $
 $0.22
 $
 $0.30
Impact of interest expense on sale-leaseback financing obligation $
 $0.02
 $
 $0.04
Impact of acquisition and integration costs $0.06
 $
 $0.20
 $
Impact of income tax (benefit) expense on non-GAAP adjustments $(0.02) $0.69
 $(0.06) $0.62
Non-GAAP net (loss) income per diluted common share $(1.09) $0.12
 $(1.05) $0.32

Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net (loss) income to EBITDA (unaudited): 
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net (loss) income, as reported $(18,768) $20,076
 $(19,746) $21,694
Income tax expense 20,910
 13,416
 20,200
 14,499
Interest expense 861
 524
 1,384
 913
Depreciation and amortization expense 8,077
 5,075
 15,330
 10,086
EBITDA $11,080
 $39,091
 $17,168
 $47,192
EBITDA Margin 6.6% 28.1% 5.7% 17.5%


Set forth below is a reconciliation of reported net (loss) incomeloss to Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited):
Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Net loss, as reported$(4,040)$(13,684)$(11,884)$(37,680)
Income tax expense (benefit)90 (60)278 13,785 
Interest expense (1)736 2,061 4,542 6,055 
Depreciation and amortization expense5,791 6,883 18,119 21,231 
ESOP and share-based compensation expense2,018 1,611 5,015 3,561 
Strategic initiatives (2)— 1,593 — 3,268 
Net losses (gains) from sale of assets426 488 (4,003)(62)
Severance— 200 942 1,397 
Weather-related event - 2021 severe winter weather— 109 — 109 
Non-recurring costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic— 40 — 300 
Impairment of fixed assets— — — 1,243 
Adjusted EBITDA (3)$5,021 $(759)$13,009 $13,207 
Adjusted EBITDA Margin4.2 %(0.8)%3.8 %4.5 %
  Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net (loss) income, as reported $(18,768) $20,076
 $(19,746) $21,694
Income tax expense 20,910
 13,416
 20,200
 14,499
Interest expense 861
 524
 1,384
 913
(Income) loss from short-term investments (21) 895
 (19) 274
Depreciation and amortization expense 8,077
 5,075
 15,330
 10,086
ESOP and share-based compensation expense 1,038
 1,152
 1,844
 2,094
Restructuring and other transition expenses 139
 3,965
 259
 6,995
Net gain from sale of Torrance Facility 
 (37,449) 
 (37,449)
Net gains from sale of spice assets (395) (334) (545) (492)
Net losses (gains) from sales of other assets 91
 114
 144
 (1,439)
Non-recurring proxy contest-related expenses 
 3,719
 
 4,990
Acquisition and integration costs 972
 
 3,382
 
Adjusted EBITDA $12,904
 $11,153
 $22,233
 $22,165
Adjusted EBITDA Margin 7.7% 8.0% 7.4% 8.2%
____________

(1) Excludes interest expense related to pension plans and postretirement benefit plans.
(2) Includes initiatives related to the Houston facility exit and opening of the Rialto distribution center.
(3) Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended March 31, 2021 includes $14.4 million of higher amortized gains resulting from the curtailment of the postretirement medical plan in March 2020, which is further described in our consolidated financial statements in the 2021 Form 10-K.
Liquidity, Capital Resources and Financial Condition
The following table summarizes our debt obligations:
March 31, 2022June 30, 2021
(In thousands)Debt Origination DateMaturityPrincipal Borrowing AmountCarrying ValueWeighted Average Interest Rate (1)Carrying ValueWeighted Average Interest Rate
RevolverVarious4/25/2025N/A$54,500 2.75 %$43,500 6.21 %
Term Loan4/26/20214/25/2025$47,50044,694 7.50 %45,278 7.50 %
     Total$99,194 $88,778 
__________
(1) The weighted average interest rate excludes the fixed rate on the de-designated Amended Rate Swap
On April 26, 2021, the Company entered into the Credit FacilityFacilities as described in more detail in Note 11, Debt
We maintain
32


Obligations, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.
The revolver under the Credit Facilities has a $125.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and SunTrust Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), with a sublimit on letterscommitment of credit and swingline loans of $30.0up to $80.0 million and $15.0a maturity date of April 25, 2025. Availability under the revolver is calculated as the lesser of (a) $80.0 million respectively. The Revolving Facility includes an accordion feature whereby we may increaseand (b) the Revolving Commitment by upamount derived from pursuant to an additional $50.0 million, subject to certain conditions. Advances are based on oura borrowing base composed of the sum of (i) 85% of eligible accounts receivable (less a dilution reserve), plus (ii) the lesser of: (a) 80% of eligible raw material inventory, eligible in-transit inventory and eligible finished goods inventory (collectively, “Eligible Inventory”), and (b) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of certain real property and trademarks, less required reserves.Eligible Inventory, minus (c) applicable reserve. The commitment fee is a flat fee of 0.25% per annum irrespective of average revolver usage. Outstanding obligations are collateralized by all of our assets, excluding certain real property not included in the borrowing base, and machinery and equipment (other than inventory). Borrowingsterm loan under the Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels withCredit Facilities has a rangeprincipal amount of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%. We are subject to$47.5 million and a varietymaturity date of April 25, 2025.
The Credit Facilities contain customary affirmative and negative covenants and restrictions typical for a financing of types customary in an asset-based lending facility, including financial covenants relating to the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio in certain circumstances, and the rightthis type. Non-compliance with one or more of the Lenders to establish reserve requirements, which may reducecovenants and restrictions could result in the amount of credit otherwise available to us. We are allowed to pay dividends, provided, among other things, certain excess availability requirements are met, and no event of default existsfull or has occurred and is continuing aspartial principal balance of the date of any such paymentCredit Facilities becoming immediately due and after giving effect thereto. The Revolving Facility matures on August 25, 2022.
At December 31, 2017, we were eligible to borrow up to a total of $110.0 million under the Revolving Facilitypayable and had outstanding borrowings of $84.4 million, utilized $1.1 milliontermination of the letterscommitments. As of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of $24.5 million. At Decemberthrough March 31, 2017, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 3.62%. At December 31, 2017,2022, we were in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants under the Revolving Facility.Credit Facilities. Furthermore, the Company believes it will be in compliance with the related financial covenants under these agreements for the next twelve months.
The Credit Facilities provide us with increased flexibility to proactively manage our liquidity and working capital, while maintaining compliance with our debt financial covenants, and preserving financial liquidity to mitigate the impact of the uncertain business environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to execute on key strategic initiatives.
At JanuaryMarch 31, 2018, we2022, the Company had estimated outstanding borrowings on the Revolver Credit Facility of $80.2$54.5 million and had utilized $1.1$4.1 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availability under the Revolving Facility of $28.7 million. At January 31, 2018, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Facility was 3.59%.


sublimit.
Liquidity
We generally finance our operations through cash flows from operations and borrowings under our Revolving FacilityCredit Facilities described above. At December 31, 2017, we had $5.4 million in cash and cash equivalents. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we liquidated substantially alllight of our preferred stock portfolio, netfinancial position, operating performance and current economic conditions, including the state of purchases,the global capital markets, there can be no assurance as to fund expenditures associated with our New Facility in Northlake, Texas. In the second quarter ended December 31, 2017,whether or when we liquidated the remaining security in our preferred stock portfolio and at December 31, 2017 the preferred stock portfolio was closed.
will be able to raise capital by issuing securities. We believe our Revolving Facility,that the Credit Facilities, to the extent available, in addition to our cash flows from operations, and other liquid assets, collectively, will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the next 12 months. We expect to 18 months.fund our long-term liquidity needs, including contractual obligations, anticipated capital expenditures, principal payments on our Term Loan Credit Facility, as well as working capital requirements, from our operating cash flows and our Credit facilities to the extent available.
ChangesAt March 31, 2022, we had $10.4 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $22.3 million available on our Revolver Credit Facility.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on our Liquidity
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted our financial position, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity as the effects of the pandemic and resulting governmental actions have decreased the demand for our products, most notably throughout our DSD network, which consists of small independent restaurants, foodservice operators, large institutional buyers, and convenience store chains, hotels, casinos, healthcare facilities, and foodservice distributors. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have material impact on our revenues during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2022.
In response to the pandemic's impact on our business, we instituted several initiatives during fiscal 2020 and 2021 to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures to help mitigate the significant negative impact of our revenue decline. In addition to the costs saving initiatives, in fiscal 2021 we repaid our existing senior secured revolving credit facility, and entered into our new Credit Facilities. We believe that the Credit Facilities provide us with increased flexibility to proactively manage our working capital and execute our long term strategy, maintain compliance with our debt financial covenants, lower our cost of borrowing, and preserve financial liquidity to mitigate the impact of the uncertain business environment resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, while continuing to execute on our strategic initiatives.
The duration and magnitude of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the extent of the weaker demand for our products, our financial position, results of operations and liquidity, which could be material, remains uncertain. The ultimate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business will depend on future developments, including the availability and cost of labor, global supply chain disruptions, variants of the virus, and the availability and use of vaccines, which is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. While we anticipate that our revenue will continue to recover as local, state and national governments continue to ease COVID-19 related restrictions, and vaccines become more widely accepted, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in returning to the pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels of revenue or profitability for fiscal 2022.
33


Cash Flows
We generateThe significant captions and amounts from our consolidated statements of cash from operating activities primarily from cash collections related to the sale of our products.flows are summarized below:
Nine Months Ended March 31,
 20222021
Consolidated Statements of cash flows data (in thousands)
Net cash used in operating activities$(9,627)$(3,488)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities166 (10,787)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities9,576 (37,264)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash$115 $(51,539)
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $(1.5) million induring the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 was $9.6 million as compared to net cash provided by operating activitiesused of $11.3$3.5 million in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. Net2021. The $6.1 million change in net cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to changes in working capital primarily related to inventory and accounts receivables, as well as bonus payments for our fiscal 2021 employee incentive program. We did not pay bonuses as part of the employee incentive program in fiscal 2020 due to the impact COVID-19 had on our business. These outflows were partially offset by realized gains from our coffee-related derivative instruments for the nine months ended March 31, 2022.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities during the nine months ended March 31, 2022 was $0.2 million as compared to net cash used of $10.8 million in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172021. The increase in cash provided was primarily due to a higher levelnet cash proceeds of cash outflows$9.1 million from operating activities primarily due to an increase in inventory balances and paymentthe sale of accounts payable balances, and lower cash inflows from operations due to an increase in accounts receivable balances. The increase in cash outflows was primarily related tothree branch assets during the addition of the Boyd Business as well as softer than expected sales resulting in higher inventories. Net cash provided by operating activities in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20162022. Also, less cash was primarily due to higher net income and a higher level of cash inflows from operating activities resulting primarily from the increase in deferred income taxes and accounts payable balances, partially offset by cash outflows from increases in inventory, payment of previously accrued bonus and restructuring and other transition expenses related to the Torrance Facility closure, purchases of short-term investments, a decrease in derivative assets and lower cash inflows from higher accounts receivable balances.
Net cash used in investing activities in the six months ended December 31, 2017 was $55.8 million asfor expansion capital expenditures compared to $56.5 million inprior year period when we increased the six months ended December 31, 2016. In the six months ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in investing activities included $39.6 million in cash, primarily used to acquire the Boyd Business, $14.7 million in cash used for purchasescapacity of property, plant and equipment, and $1.6 million in purchases of assets in connection with construction of the New Facility, partially offset by $0.1 million in proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, primarily equipment. In the six months ended December 31, 2016, net cash used in investing activities included $26.9 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment, $21.8 million in purchases of assets in connection with construction of the New Facility, and $11.1 million net of cash acquired, in connection with the China Mist acquisition, offset by $3.3 million in proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, primarily real estate.our Northlake, Texas plant.
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities induring the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 was $56.5$9.6 million as compared to $32.5net cash used of $37.3 million in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2016. Net cash provided by financing activities2021. The change of $46.8 million was primarily due to net repayments of $34.0 million under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 23, 2020 (the "Amended Revolving Facility"), which was fully repaid in prior year period. The Company also had net proceeds from revolver draw down of $11.0 million during the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017 included $56.8 million in net borrowings under our Revolving Facility, and $0.6 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $0.6 million used to pay capital lease obligations and $0.4 million in financing costs associated with the amendment of the Revolving Facility. Net cash provided by financing activities in the six months ended December 31, 2016 included $42.5 million in proceeds from sale-leaseback financing associated with the sale of the Torrance Facility, $7.7 million in proceeds from lease financing in connection with the purchase of the partially constructed New Facility, $18.4 million in net borrowings under our Revolving Facility, and $0.4 million in proceeds from stock option exercises, partially offset by $35.8 million in repayments on lease financing to acquire the partially constructed New Facility upon purchase option closing, and $0.6 million used to pay capital lease obligations.2022.
AcquisitionsCapital Expenditures
On October 2, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of Boyd Coffee. At closing, for consideration of the purchase, we paid Boyd Coffee $38.9 million in cash from borrowings under our Revolving Facility and issued to Boyd Coffee 14,700 shares of Series A Convertible Participating Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”), with a fair value of $11.8 million as of the closing date. Additionally, we held back $3.2 million in cash and 6,300 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, with a fair value of $4.8 million as of the closing date, for the satisfaction of any post-closing working capital adjustments and to secure Boyd Coffee’s (and the other seller parties’) indemnification obligations under the purchase agreement.


In addition to the $3.2 million cash holdback, as part of the consideration for the purchase, at closing we held back $1.1 million in cash to pay, on behalf of Boyd Coffee, any assessment of withdrawal liability made against Boyd Coffee following the closing date in respect of Boyd Coffee’s multiemployer plans. The parties are in the process of determining the final net working capital under the purchase agreement. At December 31, 2017, we estimated a net working capital adjustment of $(8.1) million, which is reflected in the preliminary purchase price allocation. The purchase price allocation is preliminary as we are in the process of finalizing the valuation inputs including growth assumptions, cost projections and discount rates which are used in the fair value calculation of certain assets as well as the determination of the final post-closing net working capital adjustment. The preliminary purchase price allocation is subject to change and such change could be material based on numerous factors, including the final estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the amount of the final post-closing net working capital adjustment.
At closing, the parties entered into a transition services agreement where Boyd Coffee agreed to provide certain accounting, marketing, sales and distribution support during a transition period of up to 12 months. We also entered into a co-manufacturing agreement with Boyd Coffee for a transition period of up to 12 months as we transition production into our plants. Amounts paid by the Company to Boyd Coffee for these services totaled $9.2 million inFor the three and sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2017.

On October 11, 2016, we acquired substantially all of the assets2022 and certain specified liabilities of China Mist for aggregate purchase consideration of $12.2 million, consisting of $11.2 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $0.4 million, post-closing final working capital adjustments of $0.6 million, and up to $0.5 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the calendar years of 2017 or 2018. On February 7, 2017, we acquired substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of West Coast Coffee for aggregate purchase consideration of $15.5 million, which included $14.7 million in cash paid at closing including working capital adjustments of $1.2 million, post-closing working capital adjustment of $(0.2) million and up to $1.0 million in contingent consideration to be paid as earnout if certain sales levels are achieved in the twenty-four months following the closing. We funded the purchase price for these acquisitions with proceeds under our Revolving Facility and cash flows from operations. See Note 3, Acquisitions, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
DSD Restructuring Plan
On February 21, 2017, we announced the DSD Restructuring Plan. We have revised our estimated time of completion of the DSD Restructuring Plan from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 to the end of fiscal 2018. We estimate that we will recognize approximately $3.7 million to $4.9 million of pre-tax restructuring charges by the end of fiscal 2018 consisting of approximately $1.9 million to $2.7 million in employee-related costs, including severance, prorated bonuses for bonus eligible employees, contractual termination payments and outplacement services, and $1.8 million to $2.2 million in other related costs, including legal, recruiting, consulting, other professional services, and travel. Expenses related to the DSD Restructuring Plan in the three and six months ended December 31, 2017 consisted of $0 and $24,000, respectively, in employee-related costs and $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in other related costs. Since the adoption of the DSD Restructuring Plan through December 31, 2017, we have recognized and paid a total of $2.7 million in aggregate cash costs including $1.1 million in employee-related costs, and $1.6 million in other related costs. The remaining estimated costs of $1.0 million to $2.2 million are expected to be incurred in the remainder of fiscal 2018. We may also incur other charges not currently contemplated due to events that may occur as a result of, or associated with, the DSD Restructuring Plan. See Note 4, Restructuring Plans-Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”) Restructuring Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
Corporate Relocation Plan
We estimated that we would incur approximately $31 million in cash costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan consisting of $18 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $5 million in facility-related costs and $8 million in other related costs. Since the adoption of the Corporate Relocation Plan in fiscal 2015 through December 31, 2017, we have recognized a total of $31.5 million in aggregate cash costs, including $17.1 million in employee retention and separation benefits, $7.0 million in facility-related costs related to the temporary office space, costs associated with the move of the Company’s headquarters, relocation of our Torrance operations and certain distribution operations and $7.4 million in other related costs recorded in “Restructuring and other transition expenses” in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We completed the Corporate Relocation Plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 and have $0.1 million in unpaid expenses related to employee-related costs, which is expected to be paid by the end of fiscal 2018. Additionally, from inception through December 31, 2017, we recognized non-cash depreciation expense


of $2.3 million associated with the Torrance production facility resulting from the consolidation of coffee production operations with the Houston and Portland production facilities and $1.4 million in non-cash rent expense recognized in the sale-leaseback of the Torrance Facility. We may incur certain pension-related costs in connection with the Corporate Relocation Plan which are not included in the estimated $31 million in aggregate cash costs. See Note 4, Restructuring Plans—Corporate Relocation Plan, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
New Facility Costs
We estimated that the total construction costs including the cost of the land for the New Facility would be approximately $60 million. As of December 31, 2017, we have incurred an aggregate of $60.8 million in construction costs. In addition to the costs to complete the construction of the New Facility, we estimated that we would incur approximately $35 million to $39 million for machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and related expenditures in connection with construction of the New Facility of which we have incurred an aggregate of $33.2 million as of December 31, 2017, including $22.5 million under the amended building contract for the New Facility. See Note 5, New Facility of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this report. The majority of the capital expenditures associated with machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures and related expenditures in connection with the initial construction of the New Facility were incurred in the first three quarters of fiscal 2017. We commenced distribution activities at the New Facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2017 and initial production activities late in the third quarter of fiscal 2017. We began roasting coffee in the New Facility in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017.
The following table summarizes the expenditures incurred for construction of the New Facility as of December 31, 2017 as compared to the final budget:
  Expenditures Incurred Budget
(In thousands) Six Months Ended December 31, 2017 Through Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2017 Total Lower bound Upper bound
Building and facilities, including land $
 $60,770
 $60,770
 $55,000
 $60,000
Machinery and equipment; furniture and fixtures 
 33,241
 $33,241
 35,000
 39,000
  Total $
 $94,011
 $94,011
 $90,000
 $99,000
Capital Expenditures
For the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, our capital expenditures paid were as follows:
  Six Months Ended December 31,
(In thousands) 2017 2016
Coffee brewing equipment $4,816
 $5,885
Building and facilities 265
 
Vehicles, machinery and equipment 5,051
 5,735
Software, office furniture and equipment 1,625
 1,739
Capital expenditures excluding New Facility $11,757
 $13,359
New Facility:    
Building and facilities, including land(1) $1,577
 $21,783
Machinery and equipment 2,489
 10,554
Software, office furniture and equipment 426
 2,951
Capital expenditures, New Facility $4,492
 $35,288
Total capital expenditures $16,249
 $48,647
___________
(1) Includes $21.8 million in purchase of assets for New Facility construction in the six months ended December 31, 2016.



Three Months Ended March 31,Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)2022202120222021
Maintenance:
Coffee brewing equipment$2,002 $1,578 $5,625 $4,430 
Building and facilities60 — 92 45 
Vehicles, machinery and equipment180 150 679 378 
IT, software, office furniture and equipment743 314 1,497 930 
Capital expenditures related to maintenance2,985 2,042 7,893 5,783 
Expansion Project:
Machinery and equipment24 481 992 5,251 
IT equipment— 50 — 755 
Capital expenditures, Expansion Project24 531 992 6,006 
New Facility Costs
Building and facilities— 560 11 980 
Capital expenditures, New Facility— 560 11 980 
Total capital expenditures$3,009 $3,133 $8,896 $12,769 
In the six months ended December 31, 2017, we paid $4.5 million in capital expenditures for the New Facility. In fiscal 20182022, we anticipate paying between $8$11.0 million to $11$14.0 million in maintenance capital expenditures to support investments in the business and to expand our customer base of which $2.7 million has been paid in the six months ended December 31, 2017. Additionally, in fiscal 2018 weexpenditures. We expect to pay approximately $20 million to $22 million infinance these expenditures to replace normal wearthrough cash flows from operations and tear of coffee brewing equipment, vehicles, machinery and equipment and mobile sales solution hardware of which $9.1 million has been paid in the six months ended December 31, 2017.borrowings under our Credit Facilities.
34


Depreciation and amortization expense was $8.1expenses were $5.8 million and $5.1$6.9 million in the three months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $15.3expenses were $18.1 million and $10.1$21.2 million in the sixnine months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. We anticipate our depreciation and amortization expense will be approximately $8.0$5.5 million to $8.5$7.0 million per quarter in the remainder of fiscal 20182022 based on our existing fixed asset commitments and the useful lives of our intangible assets.
Working Capital
At December 31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, our working capital was composed of the following: 
  December 31, 2017 June 30, 2017
(In thousands)    
Current assets $150,355
 $117,164
Current liabilities 166,062
 97,267
Working capital $(15,707) $19,897

Contractual Obligations
During the three months ended December 31, 2017, other than the following, there were no material changes in our contractual obligations.
At December 31, 2017, we had committed to purchase additional equipment for the New Facility totaling $6.3 million.
At December 31, 2017, we had outstanding borrowings of $84.4 million under our Revolving Facility, as compared to outstanding borrowings of $27.6 million at June 30, 2017. The increase in outstanding borrowings in the six months ended December 31, 2017 included $39.5 million to fund the purchase price for the Boyd Business and initial Company obligations under the post-closing transition services agreement.
In connection with the Boyd Coffee acquisition, as part of the consideration for the purchase, at closing we held back $1.1 million in cash to pay, on behalf of Boyd Coffee, any assessment of withdrawal liability made against Boyd Coffee following the closing date in respect of Boyd Coffee’s multiemployer plans. As we have not made this payment as of December 31, 2017 and we expect settling the pension liability will take greater than twelve months, the multiemployer plan holdback is recorded in other long-term liabilities on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017.Purchase Commitments
As of DecemberMarch 31, 2017, we2022, the Company had committed to purchase green coffee inventory totaling $55.3$87.0 million under fixed-price contracts, and $19.4 million in inventory and other purchases totaling $12.9 million under non-cancelable purchase orders.
Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2022, the Company had operating and finance lease payment commitments totaling $29.1 million. Under our Term Loan Credit Agreement, the Company is required to make quarterly principal repayments of $950 thousand, beginning in fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2022 and has commenced these payments as of March 31, 2022.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In applying many of these accounting principles, we need to make assumptions, estimates or judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. These assumptions, estimates or judgments, however, are both subjective and subject to change, and actual results may differ from our assumptions and estimates. If actual amounts are ultimately different from our estimates, the revisions are included in our results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known. For a summary of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of our 2021 Form 10-K. For a summary of our critical accounting estimates, please see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" in our 2021 Form 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of our 2021 Form 10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements. 
As of March 31, 2022, the Company had utilized $4.1 million of the letters of credit sublimit.
35


Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market value risk arising from changes in interest rates on our securities portfolio. Our portfolio of preferred securities has sometimes included investments in derivative instruments that provide a natural economic hedge of interest rate risk. We review the interest rate sensitivity of these securities and may enter into “short positions” in futures contracts on U.S. Treasury securities or hold put options on such futures contracts to reduce the impact of certain interest rate changes. Specifically, we attempt to manage the risk arising from changes in the general level of interest rates. We do
not transact in futures contracts or put options for speculative purposes. The number and type of futures and options contracts entered into depends on, among other items, the specific maturity and issuer redemption provisions for each preferred stock held, the slope of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, the expected volatility of U.S. Treasury yields, and the costs of using futures and/or options.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, we liquidated substantially all of our preferred stock portfolio, net of purchases, to fund expenditures associated with our New Facility in Northlake, Texas. In the second quarter ended DecemberAt March 31, 2017, we liquidated the remaining security in our preferred stock portfolio and at December 31, 2017 the preferred stock portfolio was closed.
Borrowings under our Revolving Facility bear interest based on average historical excess availability levels with a range of PRIME - 0.25% to PRIME + 0.50% or Adjusted LIBO Rate + 1.25% to Adjusted LIBO Rate + 2.00%.
At December 31, 2017,2022, we had outstanding borrowings on our Revolver Credit Facility of $84.4$54.5 million and had utilized $1.1$4.1 million of the letters of credit sublimit, and had excess availabilityas well as $46.6 million of debt outstanding under the Revolving Facility of $24.5 million.our Term Loan Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the RevolvingRevolver Credit Facility at December 31, 2017 was 3.62%2.75% with a LIBOR Floor of 0.50%. The weighted average interest rate on our Term Loan Credit Facility was 7.50% with a LIBOR Floor of 1.0%.
The following table demonstrates the impact of interest rate changes on our annual interest expense on outstanding borrowings subject to interest rate variability under the Revolving Facility, excluding interest on letters of credit,these Credit Facilities based on the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings as of DecemberMarch 31, 2017:2022:
(In thousands) PrincipalInterest RateAnnual Interest Expense
 –150 basis points$101,0504.94 %$4,992
 –100 basis points$101,0504.94 %$4,992
 Unchanged$101,0504.94 %$4,992
 +100 basis points$101,0505.66 %$5,719
 +150 basis points$101,0506.16 %$6,225
($ in thousands)  Principal Interest Rate Annual Interest Expense
 –150 basis points $84,430 2.13% $1,798
 –100 basis points $84,430 2.63% $2,221
 Unchanged $84,430 3.63% $3,065
 +100 basis points $84,430 4.63% $3,909
 +150 basis points $84,430 5.13% $4,331

In addition to the Credit Facilities above, the Company executed an ISDA agreement with Wells Fargo (“Amended Rate Swap”). Under the terms of the Amended Rate Swap, the Company receives 1-month LIBOR, subject to a 0% floor, and makes payments based on a fixed rate of 2.4725%, The Amended Rate Swap utilizes the same notional amount of $65.0 million and maturity date of October 11, 2023 as the original interest rate swap. See Note 4, Derivative Instruments, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the fiscal 2021 Annual Report on Form 10‑K for further discussions of our derivative instruments.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risk arising from changes in the market price of green coffee. We value green coffee inventory on the LIFOFIFO basis. In the normal course of business we hold a large green coffee inventory and enter into forward commodity purchase agreements with suppliers. We are subject to price risk resulting from the volatility of green coffee prices. Due to competition and market conditions, volatile price increases cannot always be passed on to our customers.
We purchase over-the-counter coffee-related derivative instruments to enable us to lock in the price of green coffee commodity purchases. These derivative instruments also may be entered into at the direction See Note 4, Derivative Instruments, of the customer under commodity-based pricing arrangementsNotes to effectively lock in the purchase price of green coffee under such customer arrangements, in certain cases up to 18 months or longer in the future. We accountUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for certain coffee-related derivative instruments as accounting hedges in order to minimize the volatility created in our quarterly results from utilizing these derivative contracts and to improve comparability between reporting periods.
When we designate coffee-related derivative instruments as cash flow hedges, we formally document the hedging instruments and hedged items, and measure at each balance sheet date the effectivenessfurther discussions of our hedges. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is reported in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into cost of goods sold in the period or periods when the hedged transaction affects earnings. For the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, we reclassified $(0.6) million in net losses and $0.2 million in net gains on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, excluding tax, respectively, into cost of goods sold from AOCI. Any ineffective portion of the derivative’s change in fair value is recognized currently in “Other, net.” For the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, we reclassified $(0.6) million and $(0.3) million in net losses on derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, excluding tax, respectively, into cost of goods sold from AOCI. Gains or losses deferred in AOCI associated with terminated derivative instruments, derivative instruments that cease to be highly effective hedges, derivative instruments for which the forecasted transaction is reasonably possible but no longer probable of occurring, and cash flow hedges that have been otherwise discontinued remain in AOCI until the hedged item affects earnings. If it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction designated as the hedged item in a cash flow hedge will not occur, we recognize any gain or loss


deferred in AOCI in “Other, net” at that time. For the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized in “Other, net” $0 and $(41,000) in net losses, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness. For the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recognized in “Other, net” $48,000 in net gains and $(28,000) in net losses, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness.
For derivative instruments that are not designated in a hedging relationship, and for which the normal purchases and normal sales exception has not been elected, the changes in fair value are reported in “Other, net.” In the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded in “Other, net” net losses of $(0.2) million and $(1.2) million, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges. In the six months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded in “Other, net” net losses of $(93,000) and $(1.2) million, respectively, on coffee-related derivative instruments not designated as accounting hedges.instruments.
The following table summarizes the potential impact as of DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 to net incomeloss and AOCI from a hypothetical 10% change in coffee commodity prices. The information provided below relates only to the coffee-related derivative instruments and does not include, when applicable, the corresponding changes in the underlying hedged items:
 Increase (Decrease) to Net Income Increase (Decrease) to AOCIIncrease (Decrease) to Net LossIncrease (Decrease) to AOCI
 10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate 10% Increase in Underlying Rate 10% Decrease in Underlying Rate10% Increase in Underlying Rate10% Decrease in Underlying Rate10% Increase in Underlying Rate10% Decrease in Underlying Rate
(In thousands) (In thousands)
Coffee-related derivative instruments(1)
 $211
 $(211) $4,202
 $(4,202)
Coffee-related derivative instruments(1)Coffee-related derivative instruments(1)$568 $(568)$1,883 $(1,883)
__________
(1) The Company’s purchase contracts that qualify as normal purchases include green coffee purchase commitments for which the price has been locked in as of DecemberMarch 31, 2017.2022. These contracts are not included in the sensitivity analysis above as the underlying price has been fixed.


36


Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As of DecemberMarch 31, 2017,2022, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management has determined that there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) during our fiscal quarter ended DecemberMarch 31, 20172022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On October 2, 2017, we completed the acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain specified liabilities of Boyd Coffee Company. We are currently integrating processes, employees, technologies and operations. Management will continue to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting as we complete the integration.


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.Legal Proceedings
The information set forth in Note 21, 20, Commitments and Contingencies, of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.Risk Factors
For a discussion of our other potential risks and uncertainties, see the information under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10‑K. During the nine months ended March 31, 2022, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our 2021 Form 10‑K.
Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5.  Other Information
None
37


Item 6.Exhibits
Exhibit No.Description
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
31.1*
31.2*
32.1**
32.2**
101.INS*Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022, formatted in Inline XBRL (included in Exhibit 101).
________________
Item 6.Exhibits
*Filed herewith
**Furnished, not filed, herewith
38
See Exhibit Index.





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
FARMER BROS. CO.
By:/s/ Michael H. Keown
Michael H. Keown
President and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
February 7, 2018
By:/s/ David G. Robson
David G. Robson
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
February 7, 2018






EXHIBIT INDEX
2.1By:/s/ Deverl Maserang
2.2
2.3
3.1
3.2


3.3
3.4

3.5
4.1
4.2
4.3

10.1

10.2



Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14


5, 2022
10.15
By:/s/ Scott R. Drake
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22

10.23
10.24
10.25
10.26
10.27


R. Drake
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
Farmer Bros. Co. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as approved by the stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 5, 2013) (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 11, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).**

10.32
10.33
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37
10.38
10.39
10.40
10.41
2022






39
10.42
10.43
10.44
10.45
10.46
10.47
10.48
10.49
10.50
10.51
10.52

10.53
10.54


10.55
10.56
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (furnished herewith).
________________
*Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules and/or exhibits to this agreement have been omitted. The Registrant undertakes to supplementally furnish copies of the omitted schedules and/or exhibits to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
**Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.


59