- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
----------------------
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,June 30, 1999
---------------------------
Commission File Number 1-3880
-----------------------------
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey 13-1086010
---------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
10 Lafayette Square
Buffalo, New York 14203
----------------- -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(716) 857-6980
--------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
----------------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. YES X NO
----- -----
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Common stock, $1 par value, outstanding at April 30,July 31, 1999:
38,700,95838,798,310 shares.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Company or Group of Companies for which Report is Filed:
- --------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY (Company or Registrant)
SUBSIDIARIES: National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation (Distribution
Corporation)
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation (Supply Corporation)
Seneca Resources Corporation (Seneca)
Highland Land & Minerals, Inc. (Highland)
Leidy Hub, Inc. (Leidy Hub)
Data-Track Account Services, Inc. (Data-Track)
National Fuel Resources, Inc. (NFR)
Horizon Energy Development, Inc. (Horizon)
Upstate Energy, Inc. (Upstate)
Niagara Independence Marketing Company (NIM)
Seneca Independence Pipeline Company (SIP)
Utility Constructors, Inc. (UCI)
NFR Power, Inc.
INDEX
Part I. Financial Information Page
----------------------------- ----
Item 1. Financial Statements
a. Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business - Three Months and
SixNine Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998 4 - 5
b. Consolidated Balance Sheets - March 31,June 30, 1999 and
September 30, 1998 6 - 7
c. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - SixNine
Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998 8
d. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income - Three Months and SixNine Months
Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998 9
e. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 10 - 16
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations 17 - 3940
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 3940
Part II. Other Information
--------------------------
Item 1. Legal Proceedings *
Item 2. Changes in Securities 3940
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities *
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 39 - 40*
Item 5. Other Information *40 - 41
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 4041
Signature 4142
* The Company has nothing to report under this item.
Reference to "the Company" in this report means the Registrant or the Registrant
and its subsidiaries collectively, as appropriate in the context of the
disclosure. All references to a certain year in this report are to the Company's
fiscal year ended September 30 of that year, unless otherwise noted.
This Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" as defined by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements should be
read with the cautionary statements included in this Form 10-Q at Item 2
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" (MD&A), under the heading "Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking
Statements." Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements
of historical fact, including, without limitation, those statements that are
designated with a "1" following the statement, as well as those statements that
are identified by the use of the words "anticipates," "estimates," "expects,"
"intends," "plans," "predicts," "projects," and similar expressions.
Part I. - Financial Information
- -------------------------------
Item 1. Financial Statements
--------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
----------------------------------------------
Reinvested in the Business
--------------------------
(Unaudited)
-----------
Three Months Ended
March 31,
-------------------June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per
Common Share Amounts)
INCOME
Operating Revenues $483,404 $456,441$248,658 $243,130
-------- --------
Operating Expenses
Purchased Gas 201,818 188,87464,449 65,088
Fuel Used in Heat and Electric Generation 17,807 14,1769,530 11,650
Operation 77,151 86,32376,163 62,614
Maintenance 6,064 6,5615,753 6,440
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes 30,683 30,68020,817 20,716
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization 31,726 26,798
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties - 128,99632,880 31,019
Income Taxes - Net 34,680 (9,739)7,747 11,877
-------- --------
399,929 472,669217,339 209,404
-------- --------
Operating Income (Loss) 83,475 (16,228)31,319 33,726
Other Income 1,575 25,5941,584 5,651
-------- --------
Income Before Interest Charges and
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries 85,050 9,36632,903 39,377
-------- --------
Interest Charges
Interest on Long-Term Debt 16,083 11,11516,180 14,636
Other Interest 6,198 17,1115,231 5,427
-------- --------
22,281 28,22621,411 20,063
-------- --------
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries (1,624) (2,402)348 (207)
-------- --------
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock 61,145 (21,262)11,840 19,107
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS
Balance at JanuaryApril 1 448,433 484,431492,233 446,565
-------- --------
509,578 463,169504,073 465,672
Dividends on Common Stock
(1999 - $.45;$.465; 1998 - $.435) 17,345 16,604$.45) 17,974 17,224
-------- --------
Balance at March 31 $492,233 $446,565June 30 $486,099 $448,448
======== ========
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share:
Basic $ 1.58 $(0.56)0.31 $ 0.50
====== ======
Diluted $ 1.57 N/A0.30 $ 0.49
====== ======
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Used in Basic Calculation 38,609,655 38,263,63238,662,728 38,358,065
========== ==========
Used In Diluted Calculation 38,876,685 N/A39,000,553 38,719,074
========== ==========
N/A - Not applicable due to antidilution
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
----------------------------------------------
Reinvested in the Business
--------------------------
(Unaudited)
-----------
SixNine Months Ended
March 31,June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per
Common Share Amounts)
INCOME
Operating Revenues $823,826 $827,462
-------- --------$1,072,484 $1,070,592
---------- ----------
Operating Expenses
Purchased Gas 312,824 353,141377,273 418,228
Fuel Used in Heat and Electric Generation 37,781 18,51047,311 30,160
Operation 152,422 151,837228,586 214,454
Maintenance 11,647 12,90717,400 19,347
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes 52,688 54,89173,504 75,607
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization 63,575 57,91896,455 88,936
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties - 128,996
Income Taxes - Net 52,580 13,210
-------- --------
683,517 791,410
-------- --------60,327 25,085
---------- ----------
900,856 1,000,813
---------- ----------
Operating Income 140,309 36,052171,628 69,779
Other Income 6,317 26,762
-------- --------7,901 32,413
---------- ----------
Income Before Interest Charges and
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries 146,626 62,814
-------- --------179,529 102,192
---------- ----------
Interest Charges
Interest on Long-Term Debt 33,450 22,56249,630 37,517
Other Interest 11,525 21,151
-------- --------
44,975 43,713
-------- --------16,755 26,260
---------- ----------
66,385 63,777
---------- ----------
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries (2,888) (2,829)
-------- --------(2,540) (3,036)
---------- ----------
Income Before Cumulative Effect 98,763 16,272110,604 35,379
Cumulative Effect of Change in
Accounting for Depletion - (9,116)
-------- ------------------ ----------
Net Income Available for Common Stock 98,763 7,156110,604 26,263
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS
Balance at October 1 428,112 472,595
-------- --------
526,875 479,751---------- ----------
538,716 498,858
Dividends on Common Stock
(1999 - $.90;$1.365; 1998 - $.87) 34,642 33,186
-------- --------$1.32) 52,617 50,410
---------- ----------
Balance at March 31 $492,233 $446,565
======== ========June 30 $ 486,099 $ 448,448
========== ==========
Basic Earnings Per Common Share:
Income Before Cumulative Effect $2.56$2.86 $ 0.430.93
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting for Depletion - (0.24)
----- ------
Net Income Available for Common Stock $2.56$2.86 $ 0.190.69
===== ======
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:
Income Before Cumulative Effect $2.54$2.84 $ 0.420.92
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting for Depletion - (0.24)
----- ------
Net Income Available for Common Stock $2.54$2.84 $ 0.180.68
===== ======
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Used in Basic Calculation 38,568,349 38,230,33138,619,120 38,272,907
========== ==========
Used in Diluted Calculation 38,911,856 38,673,31238,969,822 38,688,564
========== ==========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Balance Sheets
---------------------------
March 31,June 30,
1999 September 30,
(Unaudited) 1998
----------- -------------------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
ASSETS
Property, Plant and Equipment $3,244,599$3,330,839 $3,186,853
Less - Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion
and Amortization 976,0521,003,818 938,716
---------- ----------
2,268,5472,327,021 2,248,137
---------- ----------
Current Assets
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments 34,57235,848 30,437
Receivables - Net 205,393139,303 82,336
Unbilled Utility Revenue 38,36613,023 15,403
Gas Stored Underground 9,56720,737 31,661
Materials and Supplies - at average cost 22,15323,069 24,609
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs - 6,316
Prepayments 31,27926,026 19,755
---------- ----------
341,330258,006 210,517
---------- ----------
Other Assets
Recoverable Future Taxes 88,30388,302 88,303
Unamortized Debt Expense 22,32621,771 22,295
Other Regulatory Assets 41,76040,915 41,735
Deferred Charges 8,95713,736 8,619
Other 77,14077,413 64,853
---------- ----------
238,486242,137 225,805
---------- ----------
$2,848,363$2,827,164 $2,684,459
========== ==========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31,---------------------------
June 30,
1999 September 30,
(Unaudited) 1998
----------- -------------
(Thousands of Dollars)
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:
Common Stock Equity
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
Authorized - 200,000,000 Shares; Issued
and Outstanding - 38,640,51538,750,428 Shares and
38,468,795 Shares, Respectively $ 38,64138,751 $ 38,469
Paid in Capital 424,240428,273 416,239
Earnings Reinvested in the Business 492,233486,099 428,112
Cumulative Translation Adjustment (11,780)(9,454) 7,265
---------- ----------
Total Common Stock Equity 943,334943,669 890,085
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Portion 724,920 692,669726,272 693,021
---------- ----------
Total Capitalization 1,668,254 1,582,7541,669,941 1,583,106
---------- ----------
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries 23,62224,346 25,479
---------- ----------
Current and Accrued Liabilities
Notes Payable to Banks and
Commercial paper 362,100Paper 351,000 326,300
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 160,111159,696 216,929
Accounts Payable 47,21344,966 59,933
Amounts Payable to Customers 8,21621,484 5,781
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities 163,267125,666 80,480
---------- ----------
740,907702,812 689,423
---------- ----------
Deferred Credits
Accumulated Deferred Income Taxes 273,030269,855 258,222
Taxes Refundable to Customers 18,404 18,404
Unamortized Investment Tax Credit 11,94811,782 11,372
Other Deferred Credits 112,198 98,805130,024 98,453
---------- ----------
415,580 386,803430,065 386,451
---------- ----------
Commitments and Contingencies - -
---------- ----------
$2,848,363$2,827,164 $2,684,459
========== ==========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
-------------------------------------
(Unaudited)
-----------
SixNine Months Ended
March 31,June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income Available for Common Stock $110,604 $ 98,763 $ 7,15626,263
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
for Depletion - 9,116
Impairment of Oil and Gas Producing Properties - 128,996
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization 63,575 57,91896,455 88,936
Deferred Income Taxes 18,754 (48,890)12,912 (44,829)
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries 2,888 2,8292,540 3,036
Other 2,254 (1,074)5,597 (215)
Change in:
Receivables and Unbilled Utility Revenue (149,227) (100,862)(56,195) (6,357)
Gas Stored Underground and Materials and
Supplies 23,778 23,51811,659 14,422
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs 6,316 (340)-
Prepayments (11,539) (19,134)(6,284) (8,930)
Accounts Payable (11,436) (18,249)(13,234) (14,237)
Amounts Payable to Customers 2,435 (6,812)15,703 5,003
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities 82,734 84,60346,637 40,088
Other Assets (7,762) (2,798)(12,203) (11,470)
Other Liabilities 13,531 6,68031,576 12,802
-------- --------
Net Cash Provided by
Operating Activities 135,064 122,657252,083 242,624
-------- --------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital Expenditures (116,350) (220,889)(209,918) (315,223)
Investment in Subsidiaries, Net of Cash
Acquired - (75,963)(111,179)
Other (3,543) 353(114) 2,065
-------- --------
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (119,893) (296,499)(210,032) (424,337)
-------- --------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial
Paper 35,800 281,59324,700 105,187
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Debt 98,736 -198,750
Reduction of Long-Term Debt (114,334) (52,323)(115,365) (53,048)
Dividends Paid on Common Stock (34,559) (33,131)(51,904) (49,734)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock 4,761 2,3877,921 5,429
-------- --------
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
Financing Activities (9,596) 198,526(35,912) 206,584
--------- --------
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash (1,440)(728) -
--------- --------
Net Increase in Cash and
Temporary Cash Investments 4,135 24,6845,411 24,871
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at October 1 30,437 14,039
-------- --------
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at March 31June 30 $ 34,57235,848 $ 38,72338,910
======== ========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
-----------------------------------------------
(Unaudited)
-----------
Three Months Ended
March 31,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars)
Net Income (Loss) Available for Common Stock $ 61,145 $(21,262)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Cumulative Translation Adjustment (19,175) 3,213
-------- --------
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Available for
Common Stock $ 41,970 $(18,049)
======== ========
Six Months Ended
March 31,June 30,
------------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars)
Net Income Available for Common Stock $ 98,76311,840 $ 7,15619,107
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:
Cumulative Translation Adjustment 2,326 116
-------- --------
Comprehensive Income Available for
Common Stock $ 14,166 $ 19,223
======== ========
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
-----------------
1999 1998
---- ----
(Thousands of Dollars)
Net Income Available for Common Stock $110,604 $ 26,263
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax:
Cumulative Translation Adjustment (19,045) 910(16,719) 1,026
-------- --------
Comprehensive Income Available for
Common Stock $ 79,71893,885 $ 8,06627,289
======== ========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
National Fuel Gas Company
-------------------------
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
------------------------------------------
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. The equity method
is used to account for the Company's investment in minority owned entities. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated where
appropriate.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, andas well as the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Quarterly Earnings. The Company, in its opinion, has included all adjustments
that are necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the
reported periods. The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto,
included herein, should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
notes for the years ended September 30, 1998, 1997 and 1996, that are included
in the Company's combined Annual Report to Shareholders/Form 10-K for 1998. The
fiscal 1999 consolidated financial statements will be examined by the Company's
independent accountants after the end of the fiscal year.
The earnings for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 should not be
taken as a prediction of earnings for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 1999.
Most of the Company's business is seasonal in nature and is influenced by
weather conditions. Because of the seasonal nature of the Company's heating
business, earnings during the winter months normally represent a substantial
part of earnings for the entire fiscal year. The impact of abnormal weather on earnings
during the heating season is partially reduced by the operation of a weather
normalization clause included in Distribution Corporation's New York tariff. The
weather normalization clause is effective for October through May billings.
Distribution Corporation's tariff for its Pennsylvania jurisdiction does not
haveinclude a weather normalization clause. In addition, Supply Corporation's
straight fixed-variable rate design, which allows for recovery of substantially
all fixed costs in the demand or reservation charge, reduces the earnings impact
of weather fluctuations.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting. Effective October 1, 1997, Seneca
changed its method of depletion for oil and gas properties from the gross
revenue method to the units of production method. The units of production method
was applied retroactively to prior years to determine the cumulative effect
through October 1, 1997. This cumulative effect reduced earnings for 1998 by
$9.1 million, net of income tax.
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Costs. Oil and gas property acquisition,
exploration and development costs are capitalized under the full-cost method of
accounting as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Due to
significant declines in oil prices in 1998, Seneca's capitalized costs under the
full-cost method of accounting exceeded the full-cost ceiling at March 31, 1998.
Accordingly, Seneca was required to recognize an impairment of its oil and gas
producing properties in the quarter ended March 31, 1998. This charge amounted
to $129.0 million (pretax) and reduced net income for the quarter and sixnine months ended March 31,June
30, 1998 by $79.1 million ($2.07 per common share, basic; $2.05$2.04 per common
share, for the six months ended March 31, 1998, on a diluted basis)diluted).
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. For purposes of the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with a maturity of generally three months or less to be
cash equivalents. Cash interest payments during the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30,
1999 and 1998, amounted to $45.5$64.1 million and $30.5$38.0 million, respectively. Income
taxes paid during the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998 amounted to $18.6$30.4
million and $40.4$55.4 million, respectively. During the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30,
1999, the Company received a $1.0 million refund of taxes and interest from the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stemming from the final settlement of the audits
of years 1977-1994. During the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998, the Company
received a $6.2$22.4 million refund of taxes and interest from the IRS stemming from
the aforementioned settlement.
Reclassification. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform
with current year presentation.
Earnings per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by
dividing income available for common stock by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
Such additional shares are added to the denominator of the basic earnings per
common share calculation in order to calculate diluted earnings per common
share. The only potentially dilutive securities the Company has outstanding are
stock options. The diluted weighted average shares outstanding shown on the
Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the potential dilution as a result of
these stock options. Such dilution was determined using the Treasury Stock
Method as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
"Earnings per Share."
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
Note 2 - Income Taxes
The components of federal and state income taxes included in the
Consolidated Statement of Income are as follows (in thousands):
SixNine Months Ended
March 31,
----------------June 30,
-----------------
1999 1998
---- ----
Operating Expenses:
Current Income Taxes -
Federal $26,213 $52,235$35,940 $59,208
State 4,513 5,2426,050 6,814
Deferred Income Taxes -
Federal 16,861 (43,750)13,585 (41,132)
State 1,700 (5,140)1,706 (3,697)
Foreign Income Taxes 3,293 4,6233,046 3,892
------- -------
52,580 13,21060,327 25,085
Other Income:
Deferred Investment Tax Credit (332) (305)(499) (457)
Minority Interest in Foreign Subsidiaries (832) (1,457)(705) (1,576)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting - (5,736)(5,737)
------- -------
Total Income Taxes $51,416 $ 5,712$59,123 $17,315
======= =======
Total income taxes as reported differ from the amounts that were
computed by applying the federal income tax rate to income before income taxes.
The following is a reconciliation of this difference (in thousands):
SixNine Months Ended
March 31,
----------------June 30,
-----------------
1999 1998
---- ----
Net income available for common stock $110,604 $ 98,763 $ 7,15626,263
Total income taxes 51,416 5,71259,123 17,315
-------- --------
Income before income taxes $150,179$169,727 $ 12,86843,578
======== ========
Income tax expense, computed at federal
statutory rate of 35% $ 52,56359,404 $ 4,50415,252
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:
State income taxes 4,038 665,045 1,488
Depreciation 1,037 1,2251,492 1,738
Prior years tax adjustment (1,309) 3,200(1,329) 3,021
Foreign tax in excess of (less than)
federal statutory rate (2,898) (107)(2,620) 10
Miscellaneous (2,015) (3,176)
--------(2,869) (4,194)
--------- --------
Total Income Taxes $ 51,41659,123 $ 5,71217,315
======== ========
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
Significant components of the Company's deferred tax liabilities
(assets) were as follows (in thousands):
At March 31,June 30, 1999 At September 30, 1998
--------------------------------- ---------------------
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Abandonments $ 18,79718,951 $ 15,545
Excess of tax over book
depreciation 138,948140,051 132,138
Exploration and
intangible well
drilling costs 160,749163,302 147,795
Other 40,16841,855 42,109
-------- --------
Total Deferred Tax
Liabilities 358,662364,159 337,587
-------- --------
Deferred Tax Assets:
Overheads capitalized
for tax purposes (23,999)(24,793) (22,484)
Other (61,633)(69,511) (56,881)
-------- --------
Total Deferred Tax
Assets (85,632)(94,304) (79,365)
-------- --------
Total Net Deferred
Income Taxes $273,030$269,855 $258,222
======== ========
The primary issues related to Internal Revenue Service audits of the
Company for the years 1977 - 1994 were settled during March 1998 with the
settlement of remaining issues related to these same audits occurring in
December 1998. Net income for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998 were
increased by approximately $3.9 and $5.0 million, respectively, as a result of
interest, net of tax and other adjustments, related to these settlements.
Note 3 - Capitalization
Common Stock. During the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, the Company issued
61,71094,255 shares of common stock under the Company's section 401(k) Plans, 56,56088,446
shares to participants in the Company's Dividend Reinvestment Plan and 17,56826,399
shares to participants in the Company's Customer Stock Purchase Plan.
Additionally, 35,88272,533 shares of common stock were issued under the Company's
stock option and award plans, including 6,580 shares of restricted stock.
On December 10, 1998, 615,500 stock options were granted at an
exercise price of $46.0625 per share.
Shareholder Rights Plan. The Company's shareholder rights plan (the "Plan") was
adopted in 1996, and is described in the Company's combined Annual Report to
Shareholders/Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 at Note D
(Capitalization) to the financial statements which are found in Item 8. The Plan
has since beenwas amended effective April 30, 1999, and is now embodied in an Amended and
Restated Rights Agreement, which iswas included in thisas Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's
Form 10-Q as Exhibit 10-2. The amendment offor the Plan was prompted in part by recent legal developments which called into
question special voting rights, particularly in connection with the redemption
of rights issued under shareholder rights plans, reserved for certain directors
(often called "Continuing Directors" or, under the Plan, "Independent
Directors").period ended March 31, 1999.
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
In September 1998, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the
amendment of the Plan in several respects. First, all provisions conferring
special voting rights on Independent Directors for any decisions would be
replaced by a requirement that such decisions be made only upon the affirmative
vote of three-fourths of the entire Board. Second, certain obligations of the
Company under the Plan which may require prior regulatory approval would be so
qualified. Third, the original ten-year term of the Plan would be extended for
an additional two years. The Board also authorized the officers to make various
other amendments to the Plan.
These plan amendments were implemented effective April 30, 1999, by
the execution of the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement.
Long-Term Debt. In February 1999, the Company issued $100.0 million of 6.0%
medium-term notes due to mature in March 2009. After deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions, the net proceeds to the Company amounted to $98.7
million. The proceeds of this debt issuance were used to redeem $100.0 million
of 5.58% medium-term notes which matured in March 1999.
In July 1999, the Company issued $100.0 million of 6.82% medium-term
notes due to mature in August 2004. After deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions, the net proceeds to the Company amounted to $99.5 million. The
proceeds of this debt issuance were used to redeem $50 million of 7.25%
medium-term notes which matured in July 1999 and to complete the redemption of
HarCor's 14.875% Senior Secured Notes, which is discussed below.
In March 1999, the Company redeemed $10.3 million of HarCor Energy,
Inc.'s (HarCor) 14.875% Senior Secured Notes through an open market purchase.
HarCor is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Seneca. The total cost of this redemption
was $11.9 million, which included a redemption price of 110% and accrued
interest. In July 1999, the Company redeemed the remaining $43.5 million of
HarCor's 14.875% Senior Secured Notes. The total cost of this redemption was
$51.0 million, which included a redemption price of 110% and accrued interest.
As noted above, this redemption was financed primarily by proceeds from the
Company's July 1999 issuance of 6.82% medium-term notes. The redemption premiums
were accrued on the opening balance sheet when HarCor was acquired in 1998.
Note 4 - Derivative Financial Instruments
Seneca has entered into certain price swap agreements and call options to
manage a portion of the market risk associated with fluctuations in the price of
natural gas and crude oil, thereby providingin an effort to provide more stability to its
operating results. These agreements and options are not held for trading
purposes.
The price swap agreements call for Seneca to receive monthly payments
from (or make payment to) other parties based upon the difference between a
fixed and a variable price as specified by the agreement. The variable price is
either a crude oil price quoted on the New York Mercantile Exchange or a quoted
natural gas price in "Inside FERC." These variable prices are highly correlated
with the market prices received by Seneca for its natural gas and crude oil
production. At March 31,June 30, 1999, Seneca had natural gas price swap agreements
covering a notional amount of 15.417.9 Bcf extending through fiscal 20002002 at a weighted
average fixed rate of $2.30$2.45 per Mcf. Seneca also had crude oil price swap
agreements covering a notional amount of 1,282,0001,550,000 bbls extending through calendar 20002001
at a fixed rate of $18.00$17.76 per bbl. On the crude oilGains or losses from these price swap
agreements any payments received by Seneca would be subject to a floor priceare accrued in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statement of
$12.50 per bbl. For calendar 1999, any payments made by Seneca underIncome at the crude
oil price swap agreements would be calculated as the price differential above
$18.00 multiplied by two times the notional quantity. For calendar 2000, any
payments made by Seneca would revert to the price differential above $18.00
multiplied by the notional quantity.
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
At March 31, 1999, Seneca had natural gas call options (sale
position) covering a notional amount of 21.7 Bcf extending through fiscal 2001
at a weighted average strike price of $2.65 per Mcf. Seneca had crude oil call
options (sale position) covering a notional amount of 732,000 bbls for calendar
2000 at a strike price of $18.00 per bbl. Seneca also had crude oil call options
(purchase position) covering a notional amount of 1,832,000 bbls extending
through fiscal 2000 at a strike price of $20.00 per bbl.
Seneca had unrecognized gains of approximately $1.1 million related
to its derivative financial instruments.contract settlement dates. Seneca recognized gains of $4.4$0.3 million
and $5.9$6.2 million related to its price swap agreements during the quarter and
sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31,June 30,
1998, Seneca recognized net
gains of $0.5$0.9 million related to its price swap
agreements. For the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998, Seneca recognized net losses of
$7.8$6.9 million related to its price swap agreements. Gains or losses fromThe unrealized net loss on
these natural gas and crude oil price swap agreements was $2.4 million at June
30, 1999.
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
At June 30, 1999, Seneca had the following options outstanding:
Weighted Average
Type of Option Notional Amount Strike Price
- -------------- --------------- ----------------
Written Call Options* 13.9 Bcf or $2.62/Mcf or
732,000 bbls $18.00/bbl
Written Call Option 19.1 Bcf $2.65/Mcf
Written Put Option 1,100,000 bbls $12.50/bbl
Purchased Call Option 1,832,000 bbls $20.00/bbl
*The counterparty has a choice between a natural gas call option and a crude oil
call option, depending on whichever option has a greater value to the
counterparty.
Seneca's call and put options are accruedbeing marked-to-market on a
quarterly basis with gains or losses recorded in operating revenuesOperating Revenues on the
Consolidated Statement of IncomeIncome. The mark-to-market adjustment for the quarter
and nine months ended June 30, 1999 was a loss of $1.1 million, which was
recorded in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The fair
value of the call and put options at June 30, 1999 was a net liability of $3.4
million. None of the contract settlement dates.options were exercised during the quarter ended June 30,
1999. For the nine months ended June 30, 1999, a portion of the written put
options were exercised, resulting in a minimal payment of $28,000 to the
counterparty.
The Company is exposed to credit risk on the price swap agreements
that Seneca has entered into as well as on the call options that Seneca has
purchased. Credit risk relates to the risk of loss that the Company would incur
as a result of nonperformance by Seneca's counterparties of their contractual
obligations pursuant to the price swap agreements. To mitigate such credit risk,
before entering into a price swap agreement with a new counterparty, management
performs a credit check and prepares a report indicating the results of the
credit investigation. This report must be approved by Seneca's board of
directors after which a Master Swap Agreement is executed between Seneca and the
counterparty. On an ongoing basis, periodic reports are prepared by management
to monitor counterparty credit exposure. In the case of the call options that
Seneca purchased, the counterparty selected was one in which Seneca currently
has a Master Swap Agreement, meaning that a credit investigation had been
completed and continues to be monitored. Considering the procedures in place,
the Company does not anticipate any material impact to its financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows as a result of nonperformance by
counterparties.
NFR utilizes exchange-traded futures and options to manage a portion
of the market risk associated with fluctuations in the price of natural gas.
Such futures and options are not held for trading purposes. At March 31,June 30, 1999,
NFR had natural gas futures contracts related to gas purchase and sale
commitments covering 11.87.2 Bcf of gas on a net basis extending through fiscal 2000 at a
weighted average contract price of $2.22$2.40 per Mcf. NFR also had sold natural gas
options related to gas purchase and sale commitments covering 0.33.3 Bcf of gas on
a net basis extending through fiscal 2000 at a weighted average strike price of $2.14$2.68
per Mcf.
Gains or losses from natural gas futures are recorded in Other
Deferred Credits on the Consolidated Balance Sheet until the hedged commodity
transaction occurs, at which point they are reflected in operating revenues in
the Consolidated Statement of Income. At March 31,June 30, 1999, NFR had deferred lossesgains
of $1.4$3.0 million related to these futures contracts and options. NFR recognized
net losses of $4.4$1.1 million related to futures contracts and options
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 1999. For the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 1998, NFR
recognized a loss of $25,000.minimal gain. NFR recognized net losses of $5.4$6.5 million related to
futures contracts and options for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999. For the
sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998, NFR recognized net
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
----------------------------
gains of $1.4$1.3 million. Since
these futures contracts and options qualify and have been designated as hedges
these net losses and gains were substantially offset by the related commodity
transaction.
Note 5 - Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters. The Company is subject to various federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The
Company has established procedures for the ongoing evaluation of its operations
in order to identify potential environmental exposures and assure compliance
with regulatory policies and procedures.
It is the Company's policy to accrue estimated environmental clean-up
costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such
costs. Distribution Corporation has estimated its clean-up costs related to
former manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites will be
in the range of $10.0$9.1 million to $11.0$10.1 million. At March 31,June 30, 1999, Distribution
Corporation has recorded the minimum liability of $10.0$9.1 million. The Company is
currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, adverse changes in environmental regulations or other
factors could impact the Company.
In New York and Pennsylvania, Distribution Corporation is recovering
site investigation and remediation costs in rates. Accordingly, the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at March 31,June 30, 1999 includes related regulatory assets in the amount
of approximately $12.0$11.7 million.
The Company, in its international operations in the Czech Republic,
is in the process of constructing new fluidized-bed boilers at the district
heating and power generation plant of Prvni severozapadni teplarenska, a.s.
(PSZT) in order to comply with certain clean air standards mandated by the Czech
Republic government. Capital expenditures related to this construction incurred
by PSZT for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 were approximately $13.3$20.4
million. An additional $19.7$12.6 million is budgeted for this construction for the
remainder of
fiscal 1999.
For further discussion, refer to Note H - Commitments and
Contingencies under the heading "Environmental Matters" in Item 8 of the
Company's 1998 Form 10-K.
Other. The Company is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of
business. The Company is involved in regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business that involve rate base, cost of service and purchased gas
cost issues. While the resolution of such litigation or regulatory matters could
have a material effect on earnings and cash flows, none of this litigation, and
none of these regulatory matters, is expected to have a material adverse effect
on the financial condition of the Company at this time.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations
---------------------
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings. The Company's earnings were $61.1$11.8 million, or $1.58$0.31 per common share
($1.570.30 per common share on a diluted basis), for the third quarter ended June
30, 1999. This compares with earnings of $19.1 million, or $0.50 per common
share ($0.49 per common share on a diluted basis), for the quarter ended March 31,
1999. This compares with a loss of $21.3 million, or $0.56 per common share, for
the quarter ended March 31,June
30, 1998. This loss includes a non-cash impairment of
Seneca's oil and gas assets in the amount of $79.1 million (after-tax). Without
this item, the earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, would have been
$57.8 million, or $1.51 per common share ($1.49 per common share on a diluted
basis).
The Company's earnings were $98.8$110.6 million, or $2.56$2.86 per common share
($2.542.84 per common share on a diluted basis), for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30,
1999. This compares with earnings of $7.2$26.3 million, or $0.19$0.69 per common share
($0.180.68 per common share on a diluted basis), for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30,
1998. Earnings for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998 include theincluded a non-cash
impairment of Seneca'sthe Exploration and Production segment's oil and gas assets noted above, as well asand a
non-cash cumulative effect of a change in accounting. Without these two non-cash items,
earnings for the six months ended March 31, 1998 would have been $95.4 million
or $2.50 per common share ($2.47 per common share on a diluted basis). TheLast year's accounting
change, which was a change in depletion methods for Seneca'sthe Exploration and
Production segment's oil and gas assets, which had a negative $9.1 million
(after-tax), or $0.24 per common share, non-cash cumulative effect through October 1, 1997.1997,
which was recorded in the first quarter of 1998. Excluding these two non-cash
special items, earnings for the nine months ended June 30, 1998 would have been
$114.5 million, or $3.00 per common share ($2.96 per common share on a diluted
basis).
Discussion of Quarter Earnings.
Excluding the non-cash impairment noted above, the increase in earningsResults. Except for the current year'sOther Nonregulated segment, which
showed higher earnings in its timber and natural gas marketing operations,
earnings decreased in all other segments for the quarter as compared with the
prior year's quarter. The rebound in the market price of the Company's stock
during the quarter ended June 30, 1999 (the price increased from $39.25 per
common share on March 31, 1999 to $48.50 per common share on June 30, 1999),
while benefiting shareholders, carried with it the required recognition of $5.9
million of expense for stock appreciation rights (SARs). This expense is spread
across all segments. In the prior year's quarter, the Company's stock price
decreased from $47.00 per common share on March 31, 1998 to $43.56 per common
share at June 30, 1998. This resulted in the reduction of the SAR liability and
related expense by $3.2 million in the quarter ended June 30, 1998.
For the nine months ended June 30, 1999, the expense related to SARs
of $1.5 million was not as significant as in the resultquarter since it reflects the
stock price increase from September 30, 1998 ($47.00 per common share) to the
price at June 30, 1999 ($48.50 per common share). For the nine months ended June
30, 1998, there was a minimal reduction of higherthe SAR liability and related expense
since the stock price at September 30, 1997 ($44.00 per common share) was close
to the price at June 30, 1998 ($43.56 per common share).
In the Pipeline and Storage and Utility segments, earnings were down
because of the SARs expense, as discussed above, and because of $1.6 million of
expense associated with an early retirement offer effective in May 1999. In
addition, a buyout of a firm transportation agreement by a customer in the
amount of $2.5 million made a positive contribution to the Pipeline and Storage
segment's earnings in all segments, except the Explorationthird quarter of last year.
Had it not been for the early retirement charge and Production
segment.
Thethe SARs, the
Utility segment'ssegment would have shown an increase in earnings are higher mainly due to weather, which
was on average 18% colder than the prior year, and lower operating and
maintenance (O&M) expense. Despitein spite of a rate
reduction in New York that became effective October 1, 1998 as well asand a reduction in
revenues due to the setting up of a special reserve to be applied against
incremental costs resulting from the State of New York Public Service Commission's (PSC)
gas restructuring efforts, the New York Division maintained
earnings about the same asefforts. Weather that was colder than the prior year. Last year's Utility segment results
included the negative impact of interest expense in connection with the
settlementquarter
and lower operation and maintenance (O&M) expenses (exclusive of the primary issues of IRS audits of years 1977-1994.
InSARs and
early retirement) benefited the Pipeline and Storage segment, earnings are up because of lower
O&M expense and higher revenue from unbundled pipeline sales and open access
transportation. The decrease in O&M expense relates mainly to reserves
established in the second quarter of fiscal 1998 for preliminary costs incurred
on proposed pipeline projects, to a storage loss recorded in the second quarter
of fiscal 1998 and to lower benefits expense in the current quarter. The
settlement of the primary issues of the above noted IRS audits made a positive
contribution to this segment's earnings in the second quarter of last year.Utility's earnings.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
The International segment's increaseddecreased earnings came from Horizon's
investment in Prvni severozapadni teplarenska, a.s. (PSZT), a company with
district heatingreflect its Czech
Republic operations where warmer weather and power generation operations located in the Czech Republic.
Horizon initially invested in PSZT in February 1998, thus the second quarter of
fiscal 1998 reflected only two months of activity.
The Other Nonregulated segment's earnings are up because of higher
earnings in the timber operations.lower margins on heat and electric
sales negatively impacted earnings. In addition, this segment's natural gas
marketing operations experienced higher margins asthe prior year's quarter
included a resultgain of increased
volumes.approximately $1.2 million associated with U.S. dollar
denominated debt.
In the Exploration and Production segment, (excludingearnings were down
slightly. Higher interest expense associated with the non-cash
impairmentacquisitions made in the
prior year's quarter) earnings are down primarily because of
this segment's portion of interest income, recognized in last year's second
quarter, related to the previously mentioned settlement of the primary issues of
the IRS audits. In addition,year impacted earnings this quarter were hurt again because of
lowquarter. Partly offsetting this was an
increase in oil and gas prices, which, after hedging, which were below the prices forhigher than the prior year's
quarter by $5.15 per$2.80 barrel (a 32% decline)25% increase) and $0.12 per thousand
cubic feet (Mcf) (a 5% decline), respectively.an increase in both oil and gas
production.
Discussion of Six Month Earnings.Nine-Months Results. Excluding both the non-cash impairment and
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting from the prior year's period,
the increasedecrease in earnings for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 as compared
with the prior year's period was also the result of higherlower earnings in all segments, except the Exploration
and Production segment. Althoughand Pipeline and Storage segments offset in part by higher
earnings were up in the Utility, International and Other Nonregulated segments.
In the Exploration and Production segment, the
main reason wasearnings are down
primarily because of this segment's portion of interest income recognized last
year related to the settlement of the primary issues of IRS audits of years
1977-19941977-1994. In addition, earnings year-to-date reflect low oil and gas prices
experienced through most of the first part of this year and higher interest, as
discussed above.
In the Pipeline and Storage segment, lower earnings resulted from the
expense associated with early retirement offers effective in December 1998 and
May 1999, the previously mentioned buyout of a firm transportation agreement by
a customer in the prior year, and the impact of the above noted settlement of
IRS audits, which had a greater positive effect on earnings of this segment in
the prior year-to-date period. Partly offsetting these items, the prior year's
results reflect recognition of several reserves related to proposed pipeline
projects and a storage loss that did not recur this year.
In the Utility segment, earnings were up because the settlement of
the primary issues of IRS audits had a negative impact on earnings in the prior
year while adjustments made relating to the final settlement of these audits had
a positive impact to earnings in the current year. Absent the IRS audit items,
operating results of the Utility segment are actually down from the prior year
as slightly colder weather (which mainly benefits the Pennsylvania jurisdiction)
and lower O&M expense were not enough to offset the effects of the New York rate
decrease, the special gas restructuring reserve and the expense associated with
an early retirement offeroffers effective in December 1998. In the Pipeline1998 and Storage
segment, lower O&M expense, even after the early retirement charge, was the main
reason for higher earnings.May 1999.
The International segment's higher earnings reflect sixnine months of
results from one of its investmentinvestments in PSZT,the Czech Republic, while the prior
year's period only includes twofive months. Similar to the discussion for the quarter, earningsEarnings in the Other Nonregulated
segment are highercontinue to benefit from timber and the earnings of the Exploration
and Production segment are down for the year.natural gas marketing operations. A
more detailed discussion of current period results can be found in the business
segment information that follows.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
OPERATING REVENUES
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
1999 1998 % Change 1999 1998 % Change
---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
Utility
Retail Revenues:
Residential $255,452 $243,398 5.0 $420,533 $453,134 (7.2)$100,924 $100,816 0.1 $ 521,457 $ 553,950 (5.9)
Commercial 49,051 51,480 (4.7) 78,231 96,681 (19.1)15,214 17,831 (14.7) 93,444 114,512 (18.4)
Industrial 5,965 5,247 13.7 9,370 11,659 (19.6)2,618 3,478 (24.7) 11,988 15,137 (20.8)
-------- -------- ---------- ----------
118,756 122,125 (2.8) 626,889 683,599 (8.3)
Off-System Sales 5,401 9,201 (41.3) 22,897 39,972 (42.7)
Transportation 19,331 15,196 27.2 65,996 52,710 25.2
Other (292) (618) 52.8 (4,932) 2,834 (274.0)
-------- -------- 310,468 300,125 3.4 508,134 561,474 (9.5)
Off-System Sales 10,647 16,021 (33.5) 17,496 30,771 (43.1)
Transportation 27,713 22,337 24.1 46,665 37,514 24.4
Other (3,324) 3,887 (185.5) (4,641) 3,452 (234.4)---------- ----------
143,196 145,904 (1.9) 710,850 779,115 (8.8)
-------- -------- -------- --------
345,504 342,370 0.9 567,654 633,211 (10.4)
-------- -------- -------- ------------------ ----------
Pipeline and Storage
Storage Service 15,839 15,984 (0.9) 31,625 32,469 (2.6)15,663 15,315 2.3 47,289 47,785 (1.0)
Transportation 24,443 24,695 (1.0) 47,893 48,463 (1.2)22,054 22,756 (3.1) 69,946 71,218 (1.8)
Other 3,830 1,653 131.7 6,688 7,257 (7.8)2,752 3,252 (15.4) 9,441 10,509 (10.2)
-------- -------- -------- --------
44,112 42,332 4.2 86,206 88,189---------- ----------
40,469 41,323 (2.1) 126,676 129,512 (2.2)
-------- -------- -------- ------------------ ----------
Exploration and
Production 33,660 24,819 35.6 65,288 49,528 31.840,162 36,802 9.1 105,450 86,330 22.1
-------- -------- ---------- ----------
International 16,089 19,322 (16.7) 97,166 67,262 44.5
-------- -------- International 40,812 36,351 12.3 81,077 47,940 69.1---------- ----------
Other Nonregulated 32,410 24,054 34.7 107,899 85,380 26.4
-------- -------- ---------- ----------
Less-Intersegment
Revenues 23,668 24,275 (2.5) 75,557 77,007 (1.9)
-------- -------- Other Nonregulated 46,274 37,149 24.6 75,766 61,326 23.5
-------- -------- -------- --------
Less-Intersegment
Revenues 26,958 26,580 1.4 52,165 52,732 (1.1)
-------- -------- -------- --------
$483,404 $456,441 5.9 $823,826 $827,462 (0.4)---------- ----------
$248,658 $243,130 2.3 $1,072,484 $1,070,592 0.2
======== ======== ======== ================== ==========
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
INCOME TAXES
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
------------------------- -------------------------
1999 1998 % Change 1999 1998 % Change
---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
Utility $ 71,86012,640 $ 72,378 (0.7) $108,483 $119,854 (9.5)12,956 (2.4) $121,123 $132,810 (8.8)
Pipeline and Storage 20,549 14,166 45.1 39,377 37,016 6.414,256 19,960 (28.6) 53,633 56,976 (5.9)
Exploration and
Production* 8,917 (119,815) 107.4 17,156 (116,368) 114.712,640 11,859 6.6 29,796 (104,507) 128.5
International 11,919 6,024 97.9 20,616 6,909 198.4(1,941) 794 NM 18,675 7,704 142.4
Other Nonregulated 5,300 1,870 183.4 8,062 2,943 173.92,419 124 NM 10,481 3,063 242.2
Corporate (390) (590) 33.9 (805) (1,092) 26.3(948) (90) NM (1,753) (1,182) (48.3)
-------- -------- -------- --------
$118,155 $(25,967) 555.0 $192,889 $ 49,262 291.639,066 $ 45,603 (14.3) $231,955 $ 94,864 144.5
======== ======== ======== ========
*1998*The nine months ended June 30, 1998 includes a non-cash impairment charge of
$128,996,000.
NM = Not meaningful
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
SYSTEM NATURAL GAS VOLUMES
(millions of cubic feet-MMcf)
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
------------------------ -------------------------
1999 1998 % Change 1999 1998 % Change
---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
Utility Gas Sales
Retail Sales:
Residential 34,762 31,221 11.3 54,977 56,010 (1.8)11,222 10,739 4.5 66,199 66,749 (0.8)
Commercial 7,191 7,273 (1.1) 11,130 13,187 (15.6)1,926 2,219 (13.2) 13,055 15,406 (15.3)
Industrial 1,385 1,227 12.9 2,231 2,469 (9.6)
Off-System 5,195 6,470 (19.7) 7,971 10,948 (27.2)747 884 (15.5) 2,978 3,353 (11.2)
------- ------- ------- -------
48,533 46,191 5.1 76,309 82,614 (7.6)13,895 13,842 0.4 82,232 85,508 (3.8)
Off-System 2,223 3,484 (36.2) 10,195 14,432 (29.4)
------- ------- ------- -------
16,118 17,326 (7.0) 92,427 99,940 (7.5)
------- ------- ------- -------
Non-Utility Gas Sales
Production(in
equivalent MMcf) 14,622 9,563 52.9 28,849 20,453 41.116,759 15,840 5.8 45,607 36,293 25.7
------- ------- ------- -------
Total Gas Sales 63,155 55,754 13.3 105,158 103,067 2.032,877 33,166 (0.9) 138,034 136,233 1.3
------- ------- ------- -------
Transportation
Utility 23,061 20,682 11.5 38,030 35,332 7.615,608 14,690 6.2 53,638 50,022 7.2
Pipeline and Storage 108,567 101,490 7.0 190,106 195,893 (3.0)54,388 59,281 (8.3) 244,494 255,174 (4.2)
Nonregulated 67 - NM 321 276 16.316 262 (93.9) 337 538 (37.4)
------- ------- ------- -------
131,695 122,172 7.8 228,457 231,501 (1.3)70,012 74,233 (5.7) 298,469 305,734 (2.4)
------- ------- ------- -------
Marketing Volumes 12,938 9,339 38.5 20,338 14,520 40.18,875 6,176 43.7 29,214 20,696 41.2
------- ------- ------- -------
Less-Inter and
Intrasegment Volumes:
Transportation 66,878 58,351 14.6 109,651 102,743 6.723,649 22,796 3.7 133,301 125,539 6.2
Production 877 1,064 (17.6) 1,860 2,058 (9.6)578 1,001 (42.3) 2,438 3,059 (20.3)
------- ------- ------- -------
67,755 59,415 14.0 111,511 104,801 6.424,227 23,797 1.8 135,739 128,598 5.6
------- ------- ------- -------
Total System Natural Gas
Volumes 140,033 127,850 9.5 242,442 244,287 (0.8)87,537 89,778 (2.5) 329,978 334,065 (1.2)
======= ======= ======= =======
NM = Not meaningful.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Utility.
Operating revenues for the Utility segment increased $3.1decreased $2.7 million for
the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 1999, as compared with the same period a year ago.
This increase reflects the fact that this quarter combinedresulted from a reduction in retail and off-system gas sales revenue of
$3.3 million and transportation revenues increased $10.3$3.8 million, while other operating revenues
decreased $7.2 million.
The increase in gas sales and transportation revenues for the quarter
is primarily the result of colder weather in the current year quarter as
compared to the prior year quarter,respectively, offset in part by aan increase in
transportation revenue of $4.1 million. In addition, other operating revenue
increased $0.3 million.
The decrease in retail gas revenue was caused primarily by the
general base rate decrease in the New York jurisdiction effective October 1,
1998. IncreasedRetail gas revenues reflectssales volumes have increased slightly from the recovery of higher gas costs, which resulted fromprior year's
quarter, although higher volumes sold (a 2.3 billion cubic feet (Bcf) increase for the quarter ended
March 31, 1999)due to colder weather have been partly
offset by a decreasereduction in the average cost of purchased gas
($3.35 per Mcf and $3.77 per Mcf during the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and
1998, respectively). While gas sales have increased from the prior year,
primarilyvolumes due to colder weather, volumes sold have been lowered by the migration of certain retail
customers to transportation service in both the New York and Pennsylvania
jurisdictions, as ajurisdictions. This is the result of new aggregator services. See further
discussion of restructuringcustomers turning to marketers for their
gas supplies while using Distribution Corporation for gas transportation
service. (Restructuring in the Utility segment's service territory is further
discussed in the "Rate Matters" section that follows.
Other operating) Transportation revenues
and volumes are up as a result of the migration from retail service and because
of colder weather. Off-system revenues are down due to lower volumes sold. The
margins resulting from off-system sales are minimal.
Operating revenues for the Utility segment decreased $7.2$68.3 million
for the quarternine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, as compared with the same period a year
ago. This resulted from a reduction in retail and off-system gas sales revenue
of $56.7 million and $17.1 million, respectively, and a reduction in other
operating revenue of $7.8 million. These decreases were partly offset by an
increase in transportation revenue of $13.3 million.
The decrease in retail gas revenue was caused by the recovery of
lower gas costs and the general base rate decrease in the New York jurisdiction
effective October 1, 1998. The recovery of lower gas costs resulted from both
lower retail volumes sold of 3.3 billion cubic feet (Bcf) and a lower average
cost of purchased gas (the average cost of purchased gas was $3.64 per Mcf and
$4.03 per Mcf, for the nine months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively).
Despite weather that was colder than the prior year, retail volumes sold
decreased, mainly due to the prior year's quarter,migration from retail to transportation service
noted above. Transportation revenues increased and volumes are up 3.6 Bcf as a
result of this migration and because of colder weather. Off-system revenues are
down due to lower volumes sold.
The decrease in other operating revenue of $7.8 million is due
primarily to a $3.2$6.5 million gas restructuring reserve reducing revenue in the
quarter ended March 31, 1999 andcurrent nine month period, $6.0 million of revenue relatedrecorded in 1998 as a result
of the settlement of IRS audits and $0.5 million of a revenue reduction in the
current year due to ana final IRS audit settlement in the prior year's
quarter,settlement. These items are offset in part
by a $2.0$4.9 million refund provision also recorded in the prior year's quarters.nine month
period. The gas restructuring reserve is to be applied against incremental costs
resulting from the PSC's gas restructuring efforts (the PSC's gas restructuring
efforts are further discussed in the "Rate Matters" section that follows). The
$6.0 million of revenue related to the IRS audits represents the rate recovery of interest
expense as allowed by the New York rate settlement of July 1996. The refund
provision recorded in the prior year's quarterperiod was for a 50% sharing with
customers of earnings over a predetermined amount in
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
accordance with the New York rate settlement of July 1996. These threeAll of these items
are included in the "Other" category in the Utility section of the Operating
Revenues table above.
Operating revenuesincome before income taxes for the Utility segment
decreased $65.6$0.3 million for the six monthsquarter ended March 31,June 30, 1999, as compared with the
same period a year ago. This decrease is made up of combinedreflects higher O&M ($4.0 million) and
higher other operating expenses ($0.3 million) which were only partially offset
by higher margin on gas sales and transportation revenue,
which are down $57.5sales of approximately $4.0 million
and other operating revenue, which decreased $8.1
million.
The decrease in(i.e., lower revenues, as noted above, more than offset by lower purchased gas
revenues primarily reflects the recovery of lowercosts). An item that increased margin by lowering gas costs which resulted from a decrease inwas an adjustment
for lost and unaccounted-for (LAUF) gas sales (a 6.3 Bcf decrease for
the six months ended March 31, 1999) and a decrease in the average cost of
purchased gas ($3.55 per Mcf and $4.11 per Mcf during the six months ended March
31, 1999 and 1998, respectively), as well as the general base rate decrease in the New York jurisdiction effective October 1,related to
1998. The decreaseSince Distribution Corporation's earnings in gas sales
also reflects,1998 were above the
predetermined amount in part, the migration of certain retail customers to
transportation service in bothaccordance with the New York rate settlement of July
1996, 50% of the LAUF adjustment will be shared with customers and Pennsylvania jurisdictions,50% (or $1.6
million) was recognized as a result of new aggregator services. See further discussion of restructuringreduction in the Utility segment's service territorygas cost in the "Rate Matters" section that
follows.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Other operating revenues decreased $8.1 millionJune 1999. Higher O&M for
the six months
ended March 31,quarter includes higher SARs expense of $3.8 million and the expense related
to the early retirement offer effective in May 1999 compared with the six months ended March 31, 1998 due toof $1.0 million. Partly
offsetting these two major items was a
$4.9 million gas restructuring reserve reducing revenue in the current six month
period, $6.0 million of revenue recorded in 1998 as a result of the settlement
of IRS audits and $0.5 million of a revenue reduction in the current year due to
a final IRS audit settlement, offset in part by a $3.1other O&M expense of $0.8
million, refund provision
recorded in the prior year's six-month period.including labor savings.
Operating income before income taxes for the Utility segment
decreased $0.5$11.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 compared to the same period a
year ago. Excluding the $6.0 million of rate recovery of interest expense
related to the IRS audits for the 1998 quarter, as noted above (this rate
recovery is offset 100% by interest expense, included below the operating income
line), the Utility segment's pretax operating income increased $5.5 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 1999. This increase for the quarter resulted
primarily from the revenue increases, as discussed above, and a reduction in O&M
expense. The positive impact of the colder weather was greatest in the
Pennsylvania jurisdiction since Pennsylvania does not have a weather
normalization clause (WNC). The decrease in O&M expense relates primarily to
benefit and labor expense reduction.
Operating income before income taxes for the Utility segment decreased
$11.4 million for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, as compared
towith the same period a year ago. Excluding the $6.0 million of rate recovery of
interest expense related to the IRS audits in 1998, as well as $0.5 million of a
revenue reduction in 1999 due to a final IRS audit settlement, as noted in the
revenue discussion above (this rate recovery is offset 100% by interest expense,
included below the operating income line), the Utility segment's pretax
operating income decreased $4.9 million for
the six months ended March 31, 1999.$5.2 million. This decrease in pretax operating income
resulted primarily from the revenue reductionreflects a lower margin
on gas and transportation sales of approximately $3.1 million (i.e., lower
revenues, as discussednoted above, partly offset by lower purchased gas costs) and higher
O&M ($2.4 million) offset in part by lower other operating expenses ($0.3
million). Although the LAUF gain is included in the margin for the nine months
ended June 30, 1999, the lower margin reflects the previously mentioned rate
reduction and gas restructuring reserve in New York. Higher O&M expense. The lowerfor the nine
month period includes higher expense related to the early retirement offers
effective in December 1998 and May 1999 of $5.6 million. Partly offsetting this
major item was a reduction in other O&M expense is primarily due to lower benefit
andof $3.2 million, including labor
costs, despite the costs associated with an early retirement in
December 1998.
Degree Days
Three Months Ended March 31:
----------------------------
Percent (Warmer) Colder
in 1999 Than
Normal 1999 1998 Normal 1998
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Buffalo 3,405 3,277 2,785 (3.8) 17.7
Erie 3,198 3,026 2,547 (5.4) 18.8
Six Months Ended March 31:
--------------------------
Buffalo 5,665 5,248 5,079 (7.4) 3.3
Erie 5,243 4,758 4,643 (9.3) 2.5
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------savings.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Degree Days
Three Months Ended June 30:
---------------------------
Percent (Warmer) Colder
in 1999 Than
Normal 1999 1998 Normal 1998
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Buffalo 982 816 738 (16.9) 10.6
Erie 880 755 695 (14.2) 8.6
Nine Months Ended June 30:
--------------------------
Buffalo 6,647 6,065 5,817 (8.8) 4.3
Erie 6,123 5,513 5,338 (10.0) 3.3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pipeline and Storage.
Operating income before income taxes for the Pipeline and Storage
segment increased $6.4decreased $5.7 million and $2.4$3.3 million for the quarter and sixnine months
ended March 31,June 30, 1999, respectively, as compared with the same periods a year ago.
For the quarter, the increasedecrease is primarily attributable to higher SARs expense
of $4.0 million, expense related to the early retirement offer effective May 1,
1999 of $0.6 million and an accrual for a gas imbalance payable of $1.0 million.
The decrease in operating income before income taxes for the nine
months ended June 30, 1999, is primarily attributable to lower O&M costsrevenue from
interruptible transportation and higherstorage service, lower revenues from unbundled
pipeline sales and open access transportation.transportation and the accrual for the gas
imbalance payable, noted above. These items account for the majority of the $2.8
million revenue decrease of this segment. This combined with increased
depreciation and other taxes offset in part by lower O&M expense reduced pretax
operating income by $3.3 million. The reduction in O&M is partially attributable
to certain reserves and base gas loss recorded in 1998. In the previous year's quarter,year,
reserves were established for preliminary survey and investigation costs
associated with the Niagara Expansion and Green Canyon projects. In addition,
in the quarter ended March 31, 1998,
Supply Corporation recognizedlast year's period includes a base gas loss at itsthe Zoar storage field. In total,
these three items amounted to $3.7 million, pretax. O&M expense is also
down due to lower benefit costs in the current quarter.
The increase in operating income before income taxes for the six months
ended March 31, 1999, is primarily attributable to lower O&M expense, offset in
part by lower revenues from unbundled pipeline sales and open access
transportation. The reduction in O&M is attributable to the reserves and base
gas loss recorded in 1998, as discussed above, and lower benefit costs (even
after the charge for the early retirement in December 1998).million. Partly offsetting these reductions
in O&M was the reversal of a reserve for a storage project in the first quarter
of 1998.
While transportation1998 in the amount of $1.0 million and expense related to the early
retirement offers in December 1998 and May 1999 of $1.4 million.
Transportation volumes in this segment increased 7.1decreased 4.9 Bcf and decreased 5.810.7
Bcf, respectively, for the quarter and sixnine months ended March 31,
1999,June 30, 1999. For the
quarter, the majority of the volume decrease relates to firm contracted volumes
and thus the change in volumes did not have a significant impact on earnings as
a result of Supply Corporation's straight fixed-variable (SFV) rate design. Early Retirement Offer.
On March 26, 1999,For
the Company made an early retirement offernine month period, 9.5 Bcf of the 10.7 Bcf volume decrease relates to its
Pennsylvania operating employees' union in both Distribution Corporationlower
interruptible transportation. This decrease reduced Supply Corporation's
revenues by $0.5 million.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Supply Corporation. Of the 61 people eligible, 30 accepted. The early retirement
offer will result in a charge to earningsAnalysis of approximately $1.0 to $1.5 million
in the third quarterFinancial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of fiscal 1999.Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Exploration and Production.
Operating income before income taxes from the Company's Exploration
and Production segment increased $128.7$0.8 million for the quarter ended March 31,June 30,
1999, compared with the same period a year ago. Excluding the prior year's $129
million non-cash impairment of this segment's oil and gas assets, as discussed
previously, operating income before income taxes decreased $0.3 million as
compared with the prior year's quarter. This decreaseincrease resulted primarily
from higher oil prices and production and lower oil and gaslease operating costs. Oil
prices which after hedging were belowhigher than the prices for the prior year's quarter by
$5.15$2.80 per bbl and $0.12 per Mcf, respectively. Despite
lower prices, oil and gas revenues, after hedging, were up because of increased
production. Thisbbl. The production increase came mainly from the properties acquired
in the HarCor Energy, Inc. (HarCor), Whittier Trust Company (Whittier) and
Bakersfield Energy Resources (BER) acquisitions in the prior year. There was
also increased production in the Gulf Coast, primarily new production at
Vermilion 309 Galveston 239 and West Cameron 540, combined with increased
production at High Island 194. However, the increased revenuesVermilion 253. Lease operating costs decreased as a result of
management's effort to reduce costs. The increases to operating income before
income taxes noted above were more thanpartly offset by lower gas revenues, a
mark-to-market adjustment for written options (see further discussion in Note 4
- - Derivative Financial Instruments), higher depletion expense and lease operatinghigher general
and administrative costs. Lease operatingGas revenues are down primarily due to lower gas
prices, offset slightly by higher production. The weighted average gas price
after hedging decreased $0.08 per Mcf, while production increased 209 MMcf.
General and administrative costs increasedare up primarily indue to the West Coast Division as a result of the
additional leases acquired from HarCor, BER and Whittier in the prior year.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------SARs expense.
For the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, operating income before
income taxes for the Exploration and Production segment increased $133.5$134.3
million, compared with the same period a year ago. Excluding the prior year's
$129 million non-cash impairment of this segment's oil and gas assets, as
discussed previously, operating income before income taxes for the sixnine months
ended March 31,June 30, 1999, increased $4.5$5.3 million as compared with the prior year's
same period. This increase on a year-to-date basis, was mainly caused by higher
oil and gas production, due to the acquisitions on the West Coast in 1998, and
new production on certain Gulf Coast properties. However, lower weighted average
oil and gas prices, even after hedging, and higher lease operating costs, a
mark-to-market adjustment for written options (see further discussion in Note 4
- - Derivative Financial Instruments) and higher depletion expense, partly offset by
the positive impacts of this higher production.
PRODUCTION VOLUMES
Exploration and Production.
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
----------------------- -----------------------
1999 1998 % Change 1999 1998 % Change
---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
Gas Production - (MMcf)
Gulf Coast 6,507 5,860 11.0 12,941 12,701 1.98,532 8,552 (0.2) 21,473 21,253 1.0
West Coast 985 157 527.4 1,789 412 334.21,050 697 50.6 2,839 1,109 156.0
Appalachia 1,154 1,276 (9.6) 2,311 2,484 (7.0)1,069 1,193 (10.4) 3,381 3,677 (8.1)
------ ------ ------ ------
8,646 7,293 18.6 17,041 15,597 9.310,651 10,442 2.0 27,693 26,039 6.4
====== ====== ====== ======
Oil Production - (Thousands of Barrels)
Gulf Coast 337 296 13.9 670 610 9.8352 312 12.8 1,022 921 11.0
West Coast 657 80 721.3 1,293 194 566.5664 586 13.3 1,957 780 150.9
Appalachia 2 2 - 5 5 -
---7 8 (12.5)
----- --- ----- -----
996 378 163.5 1,968 809 143.3
===1,018 900 13.1 2,986 1,709 74.7
===== === ===== =====
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
AVERAGE PRICES
Exploration and Production.
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
----------------------- -----------------------
1999 1998 % Change 1999 1998 % Change
---- ---- -------- ---- ---- --------
Average Gas Price/Mcf
Gulf Coast $1.73 $2.27 (23.8) $1.86 $2.68 (30.6)$2.19 $2.29 (4.4) $1.99 $2.52 (21.0)
West Coast $1.85 $1.69 9.5 $2.09 $2.13 (1.9)$2.30 $2.19 5.0 $2.17 $2.17 -
Appalachia $2.53 $3.10 (18.4) $2.47 $3.06 (19.3)$2.31 $2.72 (15.1) $2.42 $2.95 (18.0)
Weighted Average $1.85 $2.40 (22.9) $1.97 $2.73 (27.8)$2.22 $2.33 (4.7) $2.06 $2.57 (19.8)
Weighted Average After
Hedging $2.26 $2.38 (5.0) $2.21 $2.21 -$2.24 $2.32 (3.4) $2.22 $2.25 (1.3)
Average Oil Price/bbl
Gulf Coast $11.67 $14.83 (21.3) $11.76 $16.98 (30.7)$16.54 $12.70 30.2 $13.41 $15.54 (13.7)
West Coast $12.60 $ 9.09 $11.81 (23.0) $ 8.96 $14.20 (36.9)8.75 44.0 $10.19 $10.10 0.9
Appalachia $11.45 $15.80 (27.5) $12.31 $17.93 (31.3)$14.95 $14.85 0.7 $13.19 $17.00 (22.4)
Weighted Average $ 9.97 $14.19 (29.7) $ 9.92 $16.32 (39.2)$13.97 $10.13 37.9 $11.30 $13.06 (13.5)
Weighted Average After
Hedging $10.83 $15.98 (32.2) $10.83 $16.62 (34.8)
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------$14.02 $11.22 25.0 $11.92 $13.78 (13.5)
Seneca has entered into certain price swap agreements and options to
manage a portion of the market risk associated with fluctuations in the price of
natural gas and crude oil, thereby providingin an effort to provide more stability to its
operating results (refer to the "Market Risk Sensitive Instruments" section of
this Item and to Note 4 - Derivative Financial Instruments for further
discussion). The following summarizes Seneca's settlements under suchits price swap
agreements:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
March 31, March 31,
------------------ ----------------
(thousands of dollars) 1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
Natural Gas Price Swap Agreements:
Notional Quantities -
Equivalent Bcf 5.5 5.7 11.3 13.1
Gain (Loss) $3,512 ($136) $4,130 ($8,085)
Crude Oil Price Swap Agreements:
Notional Quantities -
Equivalent bbls 180,000 219,000 315,000 453,000
Gain (Loss) $855 $677 $1,791 $239
Internationalagreements and options.
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
------------------ -----------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
Natural Gas Price Swap Agreements:
Notional Quantities -
Equivalent Bcf 6.6 6.0 17.9 19.1
Gain (Loss)
(thousands of dollars) $227,000 $(82,000) $4,357,000 $(8,167,000)
Crude Oil Price Swap Agreements:
Notional Quantities -
Equivalent bbls 232,000 219,000 547,000 672,000
Gain (thousands of dollars) $52,000 $982,000 $1,871,000 $ 1,221,000
Written Put Option on Crude Oil:
Notional Quantities -
Equivalent bbls - - 118,000 -
Gain (Loss)
(thousands of dollars) - - $(28) -
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
International.
Operating income before income taxes for the International segment
increased $5.9 million and $13.7decreased $2.7 million for the quarter and the six-months
ended March 31,June 30, 1999, respectively, compared with the
same periodsperiod a year ago. These increases,This decrease resulted from warmer weather and lower
margins on heat and electric sales combined with higher O&M expense.
Operating income before income taxes for the nine months ended June
30, 1999, increased $11.0 million for this segment. This increase, as well as
the revenue increasesincrease shown in the "Operating Revenue"Revenues" table above and the "Heat
and Electric Revenues" table below, resulted primarily from the operations of
PSZT,Prvni severozapadni teplarenska, a.s. (PSZT), a district heating and power
generation plant located in the northern part of the Czech Republic. Horizon
first acquired 75.3% of the outstanding shares of PSZT in February 1998 and
currently owns 86.2%. The quarter and sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998 reflected only twofive
months of operating revenues and income for PSZT.
The following table summarizes the heating and electricity sales of
the International segment for the quarter and sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999
and 1998, respectively:
Heating and Electric Volumes
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
------------------ -----------------
1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
Heating (Gigajoules) 4,464,875 3,830,849 8,443,772 4,861,0301,266,928 1,385,875 9,502,414 6,246,905
Electricity (Megawatt hours) 311,588 230,479 617,869 243,355279,987 277,280 897,829 520,635
Heating and Electric Revenues
Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended
March 31, March 31,June 30, June 30,
------------------ -----------------
(in thousands) 1999 1998 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ----
Heating $31,256 $25,832 $60,297 $33,706$ 8,225 $ 9,516 $68,522 $43,222
Electricity $ 9,7657,853 $ 5,696 $19,678 $ 6,080
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------9,827 $27,531 $15,907
Other Nonregulated.
Operating income before income taxes associated with this segment
increased $3.4$2.3 million and $5.1$7.4 million, respectively, for the quarter and six-monthsnine
months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, compared with the same periods a year ago. The
increases can be attributed primarily to improved performance in the Company's
timber operations and principal energy marketing subsidiary. The increased
performance in the timber operations resulted from the 1998 purchase of timber
property and two lumber mills.mills during 1998. The increased performance of NFR, the
Company's principal energy marketing subsidiary, was the result of increased
volumes and margins.margins, offset in part by higher operating and maintenance expense.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Income Taxes.
Income taxes increased $44.4decreased $4.1 million and $39.4 million, respectively, for the quarter and sixended June 30,
1999, primarily as a result of a decrease in pretax income. For the nine months
ended March 31,June 30, 1999, income taxes increased $35.2 million, primarily as a result
of an increase in pretax income (pretax income before cumulative effect, for the
sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998). For further discussion of income taxes, refer
to "Note 2 - Income Taxes" in Part I, Item 1 of this report.
Other Income.
Other income decreased $24.0$4.1 million and $20.4$24.5 million, respectively,
for the quarter and sixnine months ended March 31, 1999, mainly due to $18.5 million
of interest income resulting from the previously mentioned settlement of IRS
audits in March 1998.June 30, 1999. For the six months ended March 31, 1999,quarter, this
decrease was
partly offsetis primarily the result of a buyout of a firm transportation agreement
by $3.1a Pipeline and Storage segment customer in the prior year's quarter in the
amount of interest income in December 1998 related to the final
settlement of the IRS audits. In addition, Other Income for the quarter and six
month period ended March 31, 1998 included$2.5 million combined with a gain of approximately $2.3$1.2 million associated withthat was also
recorded in the prior year for U.S. dollar denominated debt carried on the
balance sheet of PSZT until(until December 1998, at which time it was converted to a
Czech koruna denominated loan.loan). The decrease for the nine months is due to the
same reasons noted in the quarter (the gain on U.S. dollar denominated debt was
$3.4 million for the nine month period) combined with $18.5 million of interest
income, which resulted from the settlement of IRS audits in March 1998. As an
offset to these decreases, $3.1 million of interest income was recorded in
December 1998 related to a final settlement of these audits.
Interest Charges.
Interest on long-term debt increased $5.0$1.5 million and $10.9$12.1 million
for the quarter and sixnine months ending March 31,June 30, 1999, respectively, mainly
because of a higher average amount of long-term debt outstanding compared to the
same periods a year ago. Long-term balances have grown significantly as a result
of last year's acquisitions of Severoceske teplarny, a.s. (SCT), PSZT, HarCor, Whittier and BER.BER, as well as last
year's additional investment in Severoceske teplarny, a.s. (SCT).
Other interest decreased $10.9$0.2 million and $9.6$9.5 million for the
quarter and six-monthnine-month period respectively,ended June 30, 1999. The decrease in the quarter
was the result of lower interest rates, partly offset by higher short-term debt
balances. The decrease in the nine-month period as compared to the prior year
was mainly as athe result of interest expense related to the previously mentioned
settlement of IRS audits. The quarter and
sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998 included $11.7
million of interest expense related to these IRS audits. The sixnine months ended
March 31,June 30, 1999 includes a reduction of interest expense of $2.6$1.3 million related
to the final settlement of these audits. HigherPartly offsetting these decreases in
the nine months was higher interest on short-term borrowings as the result of
higher short-term debt during the quarter and
six-month periods,balances, offset in part by lower interest rates.
Short-term debt balances are at a higher level due mainly to higher average outstanding balances, partly
offset the decreases related to the IRS audits.aforementioned
acquisitions in 1998, combined with the retirement of long-term debt in 1998.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Company's primary sources of cash during the six-monthnine month period
ended March 31,June 30, 1999, consisted of cash provided by operating activities,
long-term debt and short-term bank loans and commercial paper. These sources
were supplemented by issuances of common stock under the Company's stock and
benefit plans.
Operating Cash Flow.
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net
income available for common stock, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash
income and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash items include
depreciation, depletion and amortization, deferred income taxes, minority
interest in foreign subsidiaries and allowance for funds used during
construction. For the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1998, non-cash items also
included the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for depletion and the
impairment of oil and gas producing properties.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Utility and the Pipeline
and Storage segments may vary substantially from period to period because of the
impact of rate cases. In the Utility segment, pipeline company refunds, over- or
under-recovered purchased gas costs and weather also significantly impact cash
flow. The Company considers pipeline company refunds and over-recovered
purchased gas costs as a substitute for short-term borrowings. The impact of
weather on cash flow is tempered in the Utility segment's New York rate
jurisdiction by its WNCweather normalization clause and in the Pipeline and Storage
segment by Supply Corporation's SFV rate design.
BecauseHistorically, because of the seasonal nature of the Company's heating
business, revenues arehave been relatively high during the sixnine months ended March 31June
30 and receivables have increased between September and unbilled utility revenue historically increase from September to
MarchJune because of winter
weather.
The storage gas inventory normally declines during the first and
second quarters of the fiscal year and is replenished during the third and fourth
quarters. For storage gas inventory accounted for under the last-in, first-out
(LIFO) method, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage is
recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Income and a reserve for gas
replacement is recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and is included under
the caption "Other Accruals and Current Liabilities." Such reserve is reduced as
the inventory is replenished.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $135.1$252.1 million for
the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999, an increase of $12.4$9.5 million compared with
$122.7the $242.6 million provided by operating activities for the sixnine months ended
March
31,June 30, 1998. This slight increase is attributed primarily to the Utility
segment's contribution offset partly by a decrease to cash provided by
operations in the Exploration and Production segment. The increase in the
Utility segment accounted for the majority of this increase ascan be attributed to lower cash paymentsdisbursements for gas purchases,
taxes and operation and maintenance expensesinterest, all of which more than offset lower cash receipts from gas
sales and transportation service. Partly offsetting the increase experienced by the Utility segment was aThe decrease to cash provided by operating activitiesoperations in
the Exploration and Production segment. The Exploration and Production segment experienced a decrease to cash
provided by operating activitiesis primarily because of an increase in
interest payments combined with higher operating costs. These decreases tostemming from the acquisitions made in 1998. An increase in
cash were
partlyreceived from hedging transactions offset by the positivedecrease in cash flow associated withreceipts
from the Exploration and Production segment's hedging transactions.sale of natural gas and crude oil
production.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Investing Cash Flow.
Capital Expenditures and Other Investing Activities
- ---------------------------------------------------
Capital expenditures represent the Company's additions to property,
plant and equipment and are exclusive of investments in corporations (stock
acquisitions) and/or partnerships. Such investments are treated separately in
the Statements of Cash Flows and further discussed in the segment discussion
below.
The Company's capital expenditures and other investments totaled
$116.4$213.5 million during the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999. The following table
summarizes the Company's capital expenditures and other investments by business
segment:
(in millions)
- -------------
Other Total
Capital Investments Capital
Expenditures through Expenditures and
through 3/31/6/30/99 3/31/6/30/99 Other Investments
--------------- ------------------ -----------------
Utility $ 19.230.6 $ - $ 19.230.6
Pipeline and Storage 12.619.4 3.6 16.223.0
Exploration and Production 64.580.5 - 64.580.5
International 16.023.6 - 16.023.6
Other Nonregulated 4.155.8 - 4.155.8
------ ----- ------
$116.4$209.9 $ 3.6 $120.0$213.5
====== ===== ======
Utility
- -------
The majority of the Utility capital expenditures were made primarily for replacement
of mains and main extensions, as well as for the replacement of service lines.
Pipeline and Storage
- --------------------
The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures were made primarily for
additions, improvements, and replacements to this segment's transmission and
storage systems.
During the sixnine month period, SIP made a $3.6 million investment in
Independence Pipeline Company, a Delaware general partnership, bringing its
total investment through March 31,June 30, 1999 to $9.1 million. This investment
represents a one-third partnership interest. The investment has been financed
with short-term borrowings. Independence Pipeline Company intends to build a 370
mile natural gas pipeline (Independence Pipeline Project) from Defiance, Ohio to
Leidy, Pennsylvania at an estimated cost of $675 million.1 If the Independence
Pipeline Project is not constructed, SIP's share of the development costs
(including SIP's investment in Independence Pipeline Company) is estimated not
to exceed $9.0 to $13.0 million.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Exploration and Production
- --------------------------
The Exploration and Production segment's capital expenditures for the
sixnine months ended March 31,June 30, 1999 includedcontained approximately $40.8$46.7 million for
Seneca's offshore program in the Gulf of Mexico, including offshore drilling
expenditures, offshore construction, lease acquisition costs and geological and
geophysical expenditures. Offshore drilling was concentrated on Vermilion
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
309, Galveston 239, Vermilion 253, Brazos 414S, Brazos 375, Brazos 376 and
Brazos 376.Eugene Island Block 29. Offshore construction occurred primarily at Vermilion 309Eugene
Island 47 and West Delta 78.Galveston 239. Lease acquisition costs resulted from successful
bidding on six state of Texas tracts and five federal lease blocks in the Gulf
of Mexico. Offshore geological and geophysical expenditures were made for
purchases of 3-D seismic data.
The remaining $23.7$33.8 million of capital expenditures includedreflects, among
other things, onshore drilling, construction and recompletion costs for wells
located in Louisiana, Texas, Alabama and California as well as onshore
geological and geophysical costs, including the purchase of certain 3-D seismic
data and fixed asset purchases. The onshore capital expenditures were
concentrated on the California properties acquired through the Whittier and BER
asset purchases, as well as the HarCor stock purchase, all of which occurred in
1998. Another area of emphasis included the Thomas Ranch #1-H Well in Grimes
County, Texas.
Currently,During the quarter ended June 30, 1999, Seneca sold its 50% working
interest in the Jurassic Park prospect in Escambia and Monroe Counties, Alabama,
which included two producing wells and approximately 3,300 gross acres. Proceeds
from this sale, as well as other sales of assets within the Company, intends to spend an additional $30.0 million
beyondare
included in other investing activities in the original 1999 capital expenditure budgetStatement of $92.0 million for the
Exploration and Production segment.1 The additional $30.0 million will be
primarily for development drilling and facilities construction, with particular
emphasis being the remaining development of Vermilion 309.1Cash Flows.
International
- -------------
The majority of the International segment capital expenditures were made primarily by
PSZT for the construction of new fluidized-bed boilers at its district heating
and power generation plant in order to comply with stricter clean air standards.
Short-term borrowings and cash from operations were used to finance these
capital expenditures.
Other Nonregulated
- ------------------
Other Nonregulated capital expenditures consisted primarily of 36,300
acres of land and timber purchased from PennzEnergy Company by Seneca and
Highland. The purchase price was approximately $47 million and was funded by
short-term borrowings. The remaining capital expenditures consisted of smaller
land and timber purchases for Seneca's timber operations, as well as the
installation of new equipment for Highland's sawmill and kiln operations.
The capital expenditure programs of the Company's subsidiaries are
under continuous review. The amounts are subject to modification for
opportunities in the natural gas industry such as the acquisition of attractive
oil and gas properties or storage facilities and the expansion of transmission
line capacities. While the majority of capital expenditures in the Utility
segment are necessitated by the continued need for replacement and upgrading of
mains and service lines, the magnitude of future capital expenditures in the
Company's other business segments depends, to a large degree, upon market
conditions.1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Financing Cash Flow.
Consolidated short-term debt increased by $35.8$24.7 million during the
first sixnine months of fiscal 1999. The Company continues to consider short-term bank
loans and commercial paper important sources of cash for temporarily financing
capital expenditures and investments in corporations and/or partnerships,
gas-in-storage inventory, unrecovered purchased gas costs, exploration and
development expenditures and other working capital needs. In addition, the
Company considers pipeline company refunds and over-recovered purchased gas
costs as a substitute for short-term debt. Fluctuations in these items can have
a significant impact on the amount and timing of short-term debt.
In February 1999, the Company issued $100.0 million of 6.0%
medium-term notes due to mature in March 2009. After deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions, the net proceeds to the Company amounted to $98.7
million. The proceeds of this debt issuance were used to redeem $100.0 million
of 5.58% medium-term notes which matured in March 1999.
In July 1999, the Company issued $100.0 million of 6.82% medium-term
notes due to mature in August 2004. After deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions, the net proceeds to the Company amounted to $99.5 million. The
proceeds of this debt issuance were used to redeem $50 million of 7.25%
medium-term notes which matured in July 1999 and to complete the redemption of
HarCor's 14.875% Senior Secured Notes, which is discussed below.
In March 1999, the Company redeemed $10.3 million of HarCor's 14.875%
Senior Secured Notes through an open market purchase. The total cost of this
redemption was $11.9 million, which included a redemption price of 110% and
accrued interest. The Company used short-term debt to finance this redemption.
At March 31,In July 1999, the Company had $100.0redeemed the remaining $43.5 million of debentures
and/orHarCor's
14.875% Senior Secured Notes. The total cost of this redemption was $51.0
million, which included a redemption price of 110% and accrued interest. As
noted above, this redemption was financed primarily by proceeds from the
Company's July 1999 issuance of 6.82% medium-term notes remaining unissued and registered withnotes. The redemption premiums
were accrued on the SEC under a
shelf registration filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933.opening balance sheet when HarCor was acquired in 1998.
In March 1998, the Company obtained authorization from the SEC, under
the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, to issue, in the aggregate,
long-term debt securities and equity securities amounting to $2.0 billion during
the order's authorization period, which extends to December 31, 2002. TheIn July
1999, the Company anticipates issuingfiled a registration statement pursuant to the Securities Act
of 1933 to register up to $250$625 million of medium-term
notes during the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 1999.1 The intention of
these issuances is to repay certain outstanding short-termeither debt to retire
certain outstanding medium-term notes and to redeem the remaining amount of
HarCor's Senior Secured Notes.1or equity securities.
The Company's present liquidity position is believed to be adequate
to satisfy known demands.1 Under the Company's covenants contained in its
indenture covering long-term debt, at March 31,June 30, 1999, the Company would have been
permitted to issue up to a maximum of $506.0$499.0 million in additional long-term
unsecured indebtedness at projected market interest rates. In addition, at March 31,June
30, 1999, the Company had regulatory authorizations and unused short-term credit
lines that would have permitted it to borrow an additional $387.9$399.0 million of
short-term debt.
The amounts and timing of the issuance and sale of debt and/or equity
securities will depend on market conditions, regulatory authorizations, and the
requirements of the Company.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
The Company is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of
business. The Company is involved in regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business that involve rate base, cost of service and purchased gas
cost issues, among other things. While the resolution of such litigation or
regulatory matters could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows in
the year of resolution, none of this litigation and none of these regulatory
matters are expected to change materially the Company's present liquidity
position, nor have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the
Company at this time.1
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments.
For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer
to "Market Risk Sensitive Instruments" in Item 7 and Item 2 of the Company's 1998 Form 10-K
and Item 2 of the Company's December 31, 1998 Form 10-Q respectively.(see also "Note 4 -
Derivative Financial Instruments in this Form 10-Q). There have been no
subsequent material changes to the Company's exposure to market risk sensitive
instruments.
RATE MATTERS
Utility Operation.
New York Jurisdiction
On October 21, 1998, the PSC approved a rate plan for Distribution
Corporation for the period beginning October 1, 1998 and ending September 30,
2000. The plan is the result of a settlement agreement entered into by
Distribution Corporation, Staff for the PSC (Staff), Multiple Intervenors (an
advocate for large industrial customers) and the State Consumer Protection
Board. Under the plan, Distribution Corporation's rates are reduced by $7.2
million, or 1.1%. In addition, customers will receive up to $6.0 million in bill
credits, disbursed volumetrically over the two year term, reflecting a
predetermined share of excess earnings under a 1996 settlement. An allowed
return on equity of 12%, above which 50% of additional earnings are shared with
the customers, is maintained from the 1996 settlement. Finally, the rate plan
also provides that $7.2 million of 1999 revenues will be set aside in a special
reserve to be applied against Distribution Corporation's incremental costs
resulting from the PSC's gas restructuring effort further described below.
On November 3, 1998, the PSC issued its Policy Statement Concerning
-----------------------------
the
------------------------------- Future of the Natural Gas Industry in New York State and Order Terminating
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capacity Assignment (Policy Statement). The Policy Statement sets forth the
- --------------------
PSC's "vision" on "how best to ensure a competitive market for natural gas in
New York." That vision includes the following goals:
(1) Effective competition in the gas supply market for retail
customers;
(2) Downward pressure on customer gas prices;
(3) Increased customer choice of gas suppliers and service options;
(4) A provider of last resort (not necessarily the utility);
(5) Continuation of reliable service and maintenance of operations
procedures that treat all participants fairly;
(6) Sufficient and accurate information for customers to use in making
informed decisions;
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
(7) The availability of information that permits adequate oversight of
the market to ensure fair competition; and
(8) Coordination of Federal and State policies affecting gas supply
and distribution in New York State.
The Policy Statement provides that the most effective way to
establish a competitive market in gas supply is "for local distribution
companies to cease selling gas." The PSC hopes to accomplish that objective over
a three-to-seven year transition period, taking into account "statutory
requirements" and the individual needs of each local distribution company
(LDC).1 The Policy Statement directs Staff to schedule "discussions" with each
LDC on an "individualized plan that would effectuate our vision." In preparation
for negotiations, LDCs will be required to address issues such as a strategy to
hold new capacity contracts to a minimum, a long-term rate plan with a goal of
reducing or freezing rates, and a plan for further unbundling. In addition,
Staff was instructed to hold collaborative sessions with multiple parties to
discuss generic issues including reliability and market power regulation.
As of February 1, 1999, Staff hashad convened a multitude of
collaboratives, proceedings and discussions on various issues relating to
restructuring, including reliability of service, billing and allocation of
stranded costs. Distribution Corporation is participating in all facets of
Staff's effort.
The PSC's Order Terminating Capacity Assignment, included with the
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Policy Statement, directed the state's LDCs to file proposed tariffs, by no
later than February 1, 1999, revising the current requirement that marketers
take assignment of an allocation of upstream capacity for each customer that
elects to purchase gas from a marketer other than the LDC. Although the order
states that the so-called "mandatory assignment" feature of aggregation service
iswas terminated effective April 1, 1999, LDCs are permitted to show that their
individual circumstances may warrant continuation of the requirement. The order
also recognizes that LDCs with intermediate pipelines, like Distribution
Corporation, could present "unique cost and reliability issues which require
further consideration." The order provides that to the extent all or part of an
LDC's mandatory assignment authority is indeed terminated, there will be a
reasonable opportunity to recover stranded costs.
On February 1, 1999, Distribution Corporation filed revised tariff
sheets in compliance with the Order Terminating Capacity Assignment.
-------------------------------------------
Distribution Corporation's compliance filing is designed to comply with the
PSC's directives and operate in the same manner as the company's "System Wide
Energy Select" program approved for the Pennsylvania Division (described below).
In an order issued on March 24, 1999, the PSC rejected portions of the February
1, 1999 compliance filing without prejudice, and directed Distribution
Corporation to submit revised tariff sheets, effective April 1, 1999, to adopt a
new capacity option for retail marketers. The new capacity option eliminates
long line capacity upstream of Supply Corporation from the "mandatory capacity"
requirement described above. This change, effective April 1, 1999, allows
marketers to choose alternate capacity paths, if available, from the production
area to Supply Corporation's city gate. Marketers will continue to be obligated
to take release of Distribution Corporation's storage and transmission capacity
on Supply Corporation.
To the extent any stranded pipeline costs are generated by the above
proposal, they would be recoverable from firm service customers through a
"transition surcharge" mechanism.1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
To the extent any stranded pipeline costs are generated by the above
proposal, they would be recovered in their entirety from firm service customers
through a "transition surcharge" mechanism.1
The effective date for the compliance filing was April 1, 1999.
On March 17, 1999, the PSC issued an order in Case 98-G-0122
directing the state's LDCs to file a uniform, basic
gas-for-electric-generation-service tariff to replace tariffs filed pursuant to
the PSC's 1991 Bypass Policy Statement. Distribution Corporation serves a number
of generation customers under tariffs designed pursuant to the 1991 Bypass
Policy Statement. Although existing contracts for service would not be disturbed
by the March 17, 1999 order, future contracts would be negotiated under the
terms of the new, uniform tariff. In its filing to comply with the March 17
order, Distribution Corporation proposed to implement the PSC's uniform tariff
while retaining flexibility for individual customer negotiations. The PSC has
not ruled on Distribution Corporation's filing and the outcome cannot be
ascertained at this time. To preserve its legal rights, however, Distribution
Corporation filed for rehearing of the PSC'sMarch 17, 1999 order arguing
that (1)challenging several
features of the uniform tariff. That action remains pending.
On June 7, 1999, the PSC erredissued a notice requesting comments on a
proposal for a "single retailer" billing environment. The proposal recommends
that electric and gas utilities exit the billing function at an undetermined
future date. The retail billing function would then be performed solely by
not exempting upstate utilities in highly competitive
territories from the requirement to file a uniform tariff; (2) rate componentsunregulated marketers. Included in the uniform tariff were not properly designed or adopted; and (3)billing proposal is a prohibition against negotiating rates with affiliated generators should be
reconsideredrecommendation that
utilities design a "back-out" credit equal to prevent bypass.the long run costs avoided by each
utility when billing is provided by another party. Distribution Corporation
cannot ascertain an
outcome at this time.filed comments opposing much of the proposal, but supporting a suggested interim
regime where multiple billing arrangements, including utility billing, would be
permitted. This proceeding remains pending.
Pennsylvania Jurisdiction
Distribution Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file
with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PaPUC). Management will
continue to monitor its financial position in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction to
determine the necessity of filing a rate case in the future.
Effective October 1, 1997, Distribution Corporation commenced a PaPUC
approved customer choice pilot program called Energy Select. Energy Select,
which lasted until April 1, 1999, allowed approximately 19,000 small commercial
and residential customers of Distribution Corporation in the greater Sharon,
Pennsylvania area to purchase gas supplies from qualified, participating
non-utility suppliers (or marketers) of gas. Distribution Corporation was not a
supplier of gas in this pilot. Under Energy Select, Distribution Corporation
delivered the gas to the customer's home or business and remained responsible
for reading customer meters, the safety and maintenance of its pipeline system
and responding to gas emergencies. NFR was a participating supplier in Energy
Select.
OnEffective February 11, 1999, Distribution Corporation's System Wide
Energy Select tariff was approved by the PaPUC for an effective date of February 12,
1999.PaPUC. This program is intended to
expand the Energy Select pilot program described above to apply across
Distribution Corporation's entire Pennsylvania service territory. The plan
borrows many features of the Energy Select pilot, but several important changes
were adopted. Most significantly, the new program includes Distribution
Corporation as a choice for retail consumers, in furtherance of Distribution
Corporation's objective to remain a merchant. Also departing
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
from the pilot scheme, Distribution Corporation resumes its role as provider of
last resort, and maintains customer contact by providing a billing service on
its own behalf and, as an option, for participating marketers. Finally, the
System Wide Energy Select program addresses upstream capacity requirements in a
manner substantially similar to the method proposed for Distribution
Corporation's New York compliance filing, described above.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
AIn Pennsylvania, a natural gas restructuring bill (Senate Bill No. 943) was introduced insigned into law
on June 22, 1999. Entitled the Natural Gas Choice and Competition Act ("Act"),
the new law requires all Pennsylvania General Assembly in 1997 proposingLDCs to amend the Public Utility Codefile tariffs designed to allow allprovide
retail customers including residential, the abilitywith direct access to choose
their owncompetitive gas supplier. Senate Bill No. 943markets. Distribution
Corporation has not yet been enacted into law.
However, in December 1997, the Chairman ofscheduled by the PaPUC convened a collaborative of
gas industry interests to develop a consensus bill using Senate Bill No. 943 as
the starting point. As a member of the utility interest group,submit its compliance filing on
October 1, 1999, for an effective date on or about April 1, 2000. Distribution
Corporation is currently reviewing the filing requirements and preparing its
case. It is anticipated that the October 1 filing will continue to be an active participantlargely mirror the Energy
Select program currently in effect, which substantially complies with the collaborative.1 Distribution Corporation is not able to predict the outcome of
the bill.Act's
requirements.
Base rate adjustments in both the New York and Pennsylvania
jurisdictions do not reflect the recovery of purchased gas costs. Such costs are
recovered through operation of the purchased gas adjustment clauses of the
appropriate regulatory authorities.
Pipeline and Storage.
Supply Corporation currently does not have a rate case on file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Its last case was settled with the FERC in
February 1996. As part of that settlement, Supply Corporation agreed not to seek
recovery of revenues related to certain terminated service from storage
customers until April 1, 2000, as long as the terminations were not greater than
approximately 30% of the terminable service. Supply Corporation has been
successful in marketing and obtaining executed contracts for such terminated
storage service (at discounted rates) and expects to continue obtaining executed
contracts for additional terminated storage service as it arises.1
OTHER MATTERS
Environmental Matters.
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company has
established procedures for the ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify
potential environmental exposures and assure compliance with regulatory policies
and procedures.procedures.1
It is the Company's policy to accrue estimated environmental clean-up
costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such
costs. Distribution Corporation has estimated its clean-up costs related to
former manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites will be
in the range of $10.0$9.1 million to $11.0$10.1 million.1 At March 31,June 30, 1999, Distribution
Corporation has recorded the minimum liability of $10.0$9.1 million. The Company is
currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, adverse changes in environmental regulations or other
factors could impact the Company.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
In New York and Pennsylvania, Distribution Corporation is recovering
site investigation and remediation costs in rates. Accordingly, the Consolidated
Balance Sheet at March 31, 1990June 30, 1999 includes related regulatory assets in the amount
of approximately $12.0$11.7 million.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
The Company, in its international operations in the Czech Republic,
is in the process of constructing new fluidized-bed boilers at the district
heating and power generation plant of PSZT in order to comply with certain clean
air standards mandated by the Czech Republic government. Capital expenditures
related to this construction incurred by PSZT for the sixnine months ended March 31,June 30,
1999 were approximately $13.3$20.4 million. An additional $19.7$12.6 million is budgeted
for this construction for the rest of fiscal 1999.
For further discussion, refer to Note H - Commitments and
Contingencies under the heading "Environmental Matters" in Item 8 of the
Company's 1998 Form 10-K.
Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure.
Numerous media reports have heightened concern that information
technology computer systems, software programs and semiconductors may not be
capable of recognizing dates after the Year 2000 because such systems use only
two digits to refer to a particular year. Such systems may read dates in the
Year 2000 and thereafter as if those dates represent the year 1900 or thereafter
and, in certain instances, such systems may fail to function properly.
State of ReadinessReadiness.
The Company reportsbelieves that the majority ofall necessary work has been completed in
order to make its systems areinternal computer system Year 2000 ready, and that the few remaining systems (i.e. primarily those for which
implementation was deferred until after the 1998-1999 heating season) are
expected to be Year 2000 ready by June 30, 1999.1ready.1 Following the
completion of an early-impact analysis study, a formal project manager at the
Company was designated to spearhead the Year 2000 remediation effort. The
methodology adopted by the Company to address the Year 2000 issue is a
combination of methods recommended by respected industry consultants and efforts
tailored to meet the Company's specific needs. The Company's Year 2000 plan
addresses five primary areas.
A. Mainframe Corporate Business Applications Developed and Maintained by the
Company: A detailed plan and impact analysis was conducted in 1996-1997 to
determine the extent of Year 2000 implications on the Company's mainframe-based
computer systems. The remediation and testing in this area have been completed.completed.1
B. Personal Computer Business Applications Software Developed and Supported by
the Company: The Company has retained a consulting firm to perform a detailed
impact analysis of the personal computer business application systems supported
by the Company's Information Services Department. The firm has corrected Year
2000 problems identified by its analysis. Certain applications identified by the
consulting firm as potentially problematic have been retired and replaced with
Year 2000 compliant applications. The required changes and testing for these
applications are complete.complete.1
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
C. Vendor-Supplied Software, Hardware, and Services for Corporate Business
Applications Supported by the Company: This category includes all mainframe
infrastructure products as well as all PC client / server software and hardware.
The Company has sent letters to its vendors asking if their products and
services will continue to perform as expected after January 1, 2000. These
vendors are responsible for approximately 200 products and services associated
with corporate computer applications. The Company has
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
received responses from
all vendors which the Company believes supply critical hardware, software,
date-sensitive embedded chips and related computer services. The Company expects to completehas
completed testing and implementation of the vendor-supplied Year 2000 compliant
products and services by July 31, 1999.1services.1
D. Vendor-Supplied Products and Services Used on a Corporate Wide Basis: This
category includes the critical products and services that are used by multiple
departments within the Company including all products containing embedded chips
which might be date sensitive. The Company has sent letters to the primary
vendors who provide these products and services to the Company, requesting Year
2000 compliance plans. The Company is monitoring their responses and
incorporating them into the Company's overall Year 2000 project and contingency
plans. The Company expects to completehas completed testing and implementation of the products and
services of these vendors by May 31, 1999 (reference is made to the "Risks" section below).1
E. User-Department Maintained Business Applications: The Company uses certain
business software applications that were either built in-house or
vendor-supplied and subsequently maintained by individual departments of the
Company. The scope of such applications includes, but is not limited to,
spreadsheets, databases, vendor provided products and services and embedded
process controls. A corporate wide Year 2000 task force is in place and has
established a process to identify and resolve Year 2000 problems in this area.
This task force meets on a monthly basis to coordinate ongoing activities and
report on the project status. Providers of critical products and services have
been identified and the Company has sent letters requesting their Year 2000
compliance plans. Responses are being monitored and incorporated into the Year
2000 planning of the various departments. AllBased on responses received to date
along with internal testing, the Company anticipates that all applications and
services under this category arewill be Year 2000 ready.
Costready.1
Cost.
The cost of upgrading both vendor supplied and internally developed
systems and services is being expensed as incurred. Management estimates that
such cost will totalincurred and has amounted to approximately
$2.3$2.1 million of which approximately $1.8
million has been incurredin total. Minimal additional expenses related to date and $0.5 million remainsYear 2000
administration are expected to be spent.1
Risksincurred.1
Risks.
The Company's main concern is to ensure the safe and reliable
production and delivery of natural gas and Company-provided services to its
customers. Based on the efforts discussed above, the Company expects to be able
to operate its own facilities without interruption and continue normal operation
in Year 2000 and beyond.1 However, the Company has no control over the systems
and services used by third parties with whom it interfaces. While the Company
has placed its major third parties on notice that the Company expects their
products and services to perform as expected after January 1, 2000, the Company
cannot predict with accuracy the actual adverse consequences to the Company that
could result if such third parties are not Year 2000 compliant.1 The widespread
failure of electric, telecommunication, and
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
upstream gas supply could potentially affect gas service to utility customers,
and the Company is pursuing contingency plans to avoid such disruptions.
The majority of the devices which control the Company's physical
delivery system are not susceptible to Year 2000 problems because they do not
contain micro-processors. The Company has conducted an extensive review of its
existing micro-processors (embedded technology) and has replaced non-Year 2000
compliant hardware.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
Distribution Corporation is subject to regulatory review by both the
PSC and the PaPUC. Both of these regulatory bodies have issued orders concerning
the Year 2000 issue, and both have established dates in 1999 by which
jurisdictional utilities must have taken the necessary steps to ensure that its
critical systems are Year 2000 ready. In the event Distribution Corporation
fails to meet the requirements of those orders, it may be subject to the
imposition of fines or formal enforcement actions by the regulatory bodies.
Contingency PlanningPlanning.
The Company formed its Corporate Year 2000 task force in mid-1997.
The primary function of this group is to: (1) raise awareness of the Year 2000
issue within the Company, (2) facilitate identification and remediation of Year
2000 potential problems within the Company, and (3) facilitate and develop
corporate contingency plans. The group is comprised of middle to senior level
managers and Company executives. The Company's main thrust at present in
contingency planning is identification and prioritization of the potential risks
posed byCompany has developed Year 2000 failures outside of the Company's control. All departments
and subsidiariesstrategic
contingency plans which have submitted lists of potential risks, which are now beingbeen prioritized in relation to the overall
corporation in the order of human safety, reliability/delivery of Company
services and administrative services. The Company will be adding the operational
specifics between now and mid-September. The pertinent portions of these plans
have been filed with the New York State Public Service Commission whose review
is ongoing. The Company is currently working with other utilities in its service
areas and regional Emergency Management Services to establish communication
channels and procedures in the low probability event of a serious Year 2000
disruption. The Company has existing disaster/contingency plans to deal with
operational gas supply or delivery problems, loss of the corporate data center,
and loss of the corporate customer telephone centers. These plans are being
reviewed to address failures resulting from Year 2000 problems created or
occurring outside of the Company (i.e. loss of electricity, telephone service,
etc.). The Company expects to have its Year 2000 contingency plans completed by
mid-Septembermid- September 1999.1 The Company has selected this date as opposed to one in
early 1999 so that the contingency plans are current and operational and that
the Company will be able to use them immediately, if required.1
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking StatementsStatements.
The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this
Form 10-Q to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking
statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Forward-looking statements
include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future
events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are
other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may
publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature.
All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral and
whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are also expressly qualified by
these cautionary statements. Certain statements contained herein, including
without limitation those which are designated with a "1",
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
are forward-looking statements and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties
which could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those
expressed in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements
contained herein are based on various assumptions, many of which are based, in
turn, upon further assumptions. The Company's expectations, beliefs and
projections are expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have
a reasonable basis, including, without limitation, management's examination of
historical operating trends, data contained in the Company's records and other
data available from third parties, but there can be no assurance that
management's expectations, beliefs or projections will result
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
----------------------------- or be achieved or
accomplished. In addition to other factors and matters discussed elsewhere
herein, the following are important factors that, in the view of the Company,
could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements:
1. Changes in economic conditions, demographic patterns and weather
conditions
2. Changes in the availability and/or price of natural gas and oil
3. Inability to obtain new customers or retain existing ones
4. Significant changes in competitive factors affecting the Company
5. Governmental/regulatory actions and initiatives, including those
affecting financings, allowed rates of return, industry and rate
structure, franchise renewal, and environmental/safety requirements
6. Unanticipated impacts of restructuring initiatives in the natural gas and
electric industries
7. Significant changes from expectations in actual capital expenditures and
operating expenses and unanticipated project delays
8. Occurrences affecting the Company's ability to obtain funds from
operations, debt or equity to finance needed capital expenditures and
other investments
9. Ability to successfully identify and finance oil and gas property
acquisitions and ability to operate existing and any subsequently
acquired properties
10. Ability to successfully identify, drill for and produce economically
viable natural gas and oil reserves
11. Changes in the availability and/or price of derivative financial
instruments
12. Inability of the various counterparties to meet their obligations with
respect to the Company's financial instruments
13. Regarding foreign operations - changes in foreign trade and monetary
policies, laws and regulations related to foreign operations, political
and governmental changes, inflation and exchange rates, taxes and
operating conditions
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
14. Significant changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation or
interest
15. Significant changes in the Company's relationship with its employees and
the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to
occur
16. Changes in accounting principles and/or the application of such
principles to the Company
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
---------------------------------------------------------------
Results of Operations (Cont.)
-----------------------------
17. Unanticipated problems related to the Company's internal Year 2000
initiative as well as potential adverse consequences related to third
party Year 2000 compliance.
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
----------------------------------------------------------
Refer to the "Market Rate Sensitive Instruments" section in Item 2 -
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Part II. Other Information
- -------- --------------------------------------------
Item 2. Changes in Securities
---------------------
On January 4,April 1, 1999, the Company issued 700 unregistered shares of
Company common stock to the seven non-employee directors of the Company. These
shares were issued as partial consideration for the directors' service as
directors during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 1999, pursuant to the Company's
Retainer Policy for Non-Employee Directors.
These transactions were exempt from registration by Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as transactions not involving any public
offering.
Item 4. Submission5. Other Information
-----------------
The Company's By-Laws were amended by the Board on June 17, 1999. The
amended By-Laws are included in this Form 10-Q as Exhibit 3(ii). Specifically,
the By-Laws were amended at Article I ("Meetings of MattersStockholders") to insert new
Sections 7 and 8. These amendments relate to both those matters which may
properly come before meetings of stockholders and the conduct of such meetings.
Among other things, as permitted by SEC Rule 14a-4(c) [17 CFR Section
240.14a-4(c)] the amendments incorporated into the By-Laws an "advance notice
provision" describing when a Votestockholder's notice of Security Holders
---------------------------------------------------
The Annual Meetingbusiness or nominations to
be considered at a meeting of Shareholdersstockholders will be considered timely. Under most
circumstances, this provision requires that a stockholder provide such a notice
at least 110 days prior to the anniversary of National Fuel Gasthe date on which the Company
was
heldmailed its proxy materials for the prior year's annual meeting of stockholders.
For example, since the Company mailed its proxy materials for the February 1999
annual meeting on December 31, 1998, a stockholder's notice of business or
nominations for the February 18,2000 annual meeting will be due on September 13,
1999. At that meeting, the shareholders elected directors,
appointed independent accountants and rejected a shareholder proposal.
The total votes were as follows:
Against Broker
For or Withheld Abstain Non-Votes
---------- ----------- ------- ---------
(i) Election of directors
to serve for a three-
year term:
- Robert T. Brady 32,995,578 883,944 - -
- William J. Hill 32,913,298 966,224 - -
- Bernard J. Kennedy 32,921,850 957,672 - -
Directors whose term of office continued after the meeting:
Term expiring in 2000: Eugene T. Mann, George L. Mazanec and George H.
Schofield.
Term expiring in 2001: Philip C. Ackerman, James V. Glynn and Bernard
S. Lee.
Item 4. Submission5. Other Information (Cont.)
-------------------------
This requirement is separate and apart from the requirements of MattersSEC
Rule 14 a-8 (17 CFR Section 240.14 a-8)that a stockholder must meet in order to
have a Vote of Security Holders (Cont.)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Against Broker
For or Withheld Abstain Non-Votes
---------- ----------- ------- ---------
(ii) Appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as independent
accountants 33,297,456 346,998 235,068 -
(iii) A shareholder
proposed resolution
regardingstockholder proposal included in the Company's Stock Plans 4,461,906 22,748,220 1,279,029 5,390,367proxy statement and form
of proxy.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
--------------------------------
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
Number Description of Exhibit
------ ----------------------
(3)(ii) By-Laws, as amended on June 17, 1999
(10) Material Contracts
10.1 Amendment to the National Fuel Gas Company
Deferred Compensation Plan, dated February
18, 1999.
10.2 AmendedForm of Employment Continuation and
Restated RightsNoncompetition Agreement, dated as of
April 30, 1999, between National Fuel
Gas CompanyDecember 11, 1998, with Philip C. Ackerman,
Walter E. DeForest, Joseph P. Pawlowski,
Dennis J. Seeley, David F. Smith and HSBC Bank USA.Gerald
T. Wehrlin.
10.2 Form of Employment Continuation and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of
December 11, 1998, with Bruce H. Hale and
Richard Hare.
10.3 Form of Employment Continuation and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of
December 11, 1998, with James A. Beck.
(12) Statements regarding Computation of Ratios:
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the
Twelve Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and the
Fiscal
Years Ended September 30, 1994 through 1998.
(27) Financial Data Schedules
27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the SixNine Months
Ended March 31,June 30, 1999.
27.2 Amended Financial Data Schedule for the SixNine
Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1998.
(99) National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated
Statement of Income for the Twelve Months
Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None
SIGNATURE
---------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
-------------------------
(Registrant)
/s/Joseph P. Pawlowski
----------------------------------------------------------
Joseph P. Pawlowski
Treasurer and
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: May 14,August 13, 1999
---------------------------
EXHIBIT INDEX
(Form 10Q)
Exhibit 10.1 Amendment to the National Fuel Gas Company
Deferred Compensation Plan, dated February 18,3(ii) By-Laws, as amended on June 17, 1999.
Exhibit 10.2 Amended10.1 Form of Employment Continuation and
Restated RightsNoncompetition Agreement, dated as of April 30, 1999, between National Fuel Gas CompanyDecember 11,
1998, with Philip C. Ackerman, Walter E. DeForest,
Joseph P. Pawlowski, Dennis J. Seeley David F. Smith
and HSBC Bank USA.Gerald T. Wehrlin.
Exhibit 10.2 Form of Employment Continuation and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of December 11,
1998, with Bruce H. Hale and Richard Hare.
Exhibit 10.3 Form of Employment Continuation and
Noncompetition Agreement, dated as of December 11,
1998, with James A. Beck.
Exhibit 12 Statements regarding Computation of Ratios:
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve
Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and the Fiscal Years Ended
September 30, 1994 through 1998.
Exhibit 27.1 Financial Data Schedule for the SixNine Months
Ended March 31,June 30, 1999.
Exhibit 27.2 Amended Financial Data Schedule for the SixNine Months
Ended March 31,June 30, 1998.
Exhibit 99 National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated Statement
of Income for the Twelve Months Ended March 31,June 30, 1999
and 1998.