CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME												CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005													FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(in thousands except per share data)	(in thousands except per share data)												(in thousands except per share data)
(unaudited)	(unaudited)												(unaudited)
	Three months ended						Six months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30						June 30						September 30						September 30
	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
REVENUES
Customer services	$	232,222		$	214,326		$	426,408		$	398,241		$	227,816		$	209,346		$	654,225		$	607,587
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of services provided		119,035			114,294			226,049			214,544			119,206			110,083			345,255			324,626
Depreciation and amortization		6,945			6,045			13,738			12,008			6,662			5,800			20,400			17,808
Sales, general and administrative		74,368			67,594			136,868			126,265			74,472			68,574			211,340			194,839
Pension curtailment gain		-			(4,176	)		-			(4,176	)		-			-			-			(4,176	)
(Gain)/loss on sales of assets		2			(546	)		1			(544	)
Gain on sales of assets														(17	)		(1	)		(15	)		(544	)
Interest income		(344	)		(354	)		(636	)		(816	)		(332	)		(489	)		(968	)		(1,305	)
		200,006			182,857			376,020			347,281			199,991			183,967			576,012			531,248
INCOME BEFORE TAXES		32,216			31,469			50,388			50,960			27,825			25,379			78,213			76,339

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
Current		11,079			14,144			16,945			19,725			8,854			9,108			25,799			28,833
Deferred		1,807			(1,399	)		3,210			914			1,934			1,171			5,144			2,085
		12,886			12,745			20,155			20,639			10,788			10,279			30,943			30,918
NET INCOME	$	19,330		$	18,724		$	30,233		$	30,321		$	17,037		$	15,100		$	47,270		$	45,421

NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC	$	0.29		$	0.28		$	0.45		$	0.45		$	0.25		$	0.22		$	0.70		$	0.67
NET INCOME PER SHARE - DILUTED	$	0.28		$	0.27		$	0.44		$	0.43		$	0.25		$	0.22		$	0.69		$	0.65

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		67,556			67,937			67,243			67,940			67,068			68,117			67,184			67,999
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		69,243			70,029			69,040			70,046			68,700			70,042			68,926			70,046
DIVIDENDS PAID PER SHARE	$	0.0625		$	0.0500		$	0.1250		$	0.1000		$	0.0625		$	0.0500		$	0.1875		$	0.1500


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.												The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS						CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005							FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
(in thousands)	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
(unaudited)	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
	Six months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	$	30,233		$	30,321		$	47,270		$	45,421
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		13,738			12,008			20,400			17,808
Pension curtailment gain		-			(4,176	)		-			(4,176	)
Provision for deferred income taxes		3,210			914			5,144			2,085
(Gain)/loss on sales of assets		1			(544	)
Gain on sales of assets								(15	)		(544	)
Other, net		(770	)		205			3			(1,309	)
(Increase)/decrease in assets:
Trade receivables		(9,605	)		(3,801	)		(9,747	)		(3,186	)
Materials and supplies		537			761			685			1,536
Other current assets		(910	)		(3,594	)		138			(2,059	)
Other non-current assets		747			297			735			233
Increase/(decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		130			5,951			3,461			9,212
Unearned revenue		4,388			5,142			8,955			8,885
Accrued insurance		1,768			(1,967	)		1,398			(2,484	)
Accrual for termite contracts		1,000			599			(3,900	)		(1,263	)
Accrued pension		(5,000	)		-			(5,000	)		-
Long-term accrued liabilities		(5,146	)		(1,717	)		(6,666	)		380
Net cash provided by operating activities		34,321			40,399			62,861			70,539
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of equipment and property		(11,351	)		(14,203	)		(15,657	)		(16,999	)
Acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired		(5,020	)		(1,606	)		(5,050	)		(3,022	)
Cash from sales of franchises		401			295			550			340
Marketable securities, net		-			(629	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		-			749			20			752
Net cash used in investing activities		(15,970	)		(15,394	)		(20,137	)		(18,929	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid		(8,556	)		(6,858	)		(12,790	)		(10,304	)
Common stock purchased		(16,987	)		(11,105	)		(19,452	)		(21,313	)
Common stock options exercised		381			2,889			435			3,229
Principal payments on capital leases		(393	)		-			(566	)		-
Other		451			(646	)		(236	)		(1,215	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(25,104	)		(15,720	)		(32,609	)		(29,603	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		909			(843	)		607			745
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(5,884	)		8,442
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								10,722			22,752
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		43,065			56,737			43,065			56,737
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	37,221		$	65,179		$	53,787		$	79,489

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	90		$	20		$	43		$	130
Cash paid for income taxes	$	14,064		$	12,228		$	21,338		$	21,025

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.						The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY																															CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
																				Accumulated																															Accumulated
														Treasury			Comprehensive			Other																									Treasury			Comprehensive			Other
	Common stock				Treasury Stock						Paid						Income/			Comprehensive			Unearned			Retained						Common stock				Treasury Stock						Paid						Income/			Comprehensive			Unearned			Retained
	Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			In-capital						(Loss)			Income/(Loss)			Compensation			Earnings			Total			Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			In-capital						(Loss)			Income/(Loss)			Compensation			Earnings			Total
Balance at December 31, 2003		68,356	$	68,356		(621	)	$	(621	)	$	2,321		$	2,087		$	-		$	(314	)	$	(107	)	$	67,052		$	138,774
Balance at December 31, 2004																																	69,060	$	69,060		(556	)	$	(556	)	$	7,419		$	3,240		$	-		$	(16,066	)	$	(3,475	)	$	107,927			167,549
Net Income																		52,055									52,055			52,055																			52,773									52,773			52,773
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment																		(18,355	)											(18,355	)																		(8,181	)											(8,181	)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments ~~(1)~~																		2,408												2,408																			1,114												1,114
NSO Stock Options																		131												131
Realized Loss on Investments																		64												64
Other Comprehensive Income																		(15,752	)		(15,752	)
Comprehensive Income																	$	36,303
Cash Dividends																											(10,924	)		(10,924	)
Common Stock Purchased						(38	)		(38	)					(899	)											-			(937	)
Issuance of 401(k) Company Match						83			83						2,052												-			2,135
Three-for-Two Stock Split – 2005		234		234		22			22																		(256	)		-
Unearned Compensation		152		152								3,701												(3,368	)		-			485
Other		318		318		(2	)		(2	)		1,397												-			-			1,713
Balance at December 31, 2004		69,060	$	69,060		(556	)	$	(556	)	$	7,419		$	3,240		$	-		$	(16,066	)	$	(3,475	)	$	107,927			167,549
Net Income																		52,773									52,773			52,773
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment																		(8,181	)											(8,181	)
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments																		1,114												1,114
NSO Stock Options																		(131	)											(131	)																		(131	)											(131	)
Other Comprehensive Income																		(7,198	)		(7,198	)																											(7,198	)		(7,198	)
Comprehensive Income																	$	45,575																														$	45,575
Cash Dividends																											(13,714	)		(13,714	)																											(13,714	)		(13,714	)
Common Stock Purchased (2)						(1,438	)		(1,438	)					(5,349	)											(23,446	)		(30,233	)						(1,438	)		(1,438	)					(5,349	)											(23,446	)		(30,233	)
Issuance of 401(k) Company Match						90			90						2,109												-			2,199							90			90						2,109												-			2,199
Three-for-Two Stock Split – 2005		68		68		(164	)		(164	)		10															86			-			68		68		(164	)		(164	)		10															86			-
Unearned Compensation		146		146								3,490												(2,406	)		(5	)		1,225			146		146								3,490												(2,406	)		(5	)		1,225
Common Stock Options Exercised		805		805								2,523															-			3,328			805		805								2,523															-			3,328
Non-Qualified Stock Options												1,022												-			-			1,022													1,022												-			-			1,022
Balance at December 31, 2005		70,079	$	70,079		(2,068	)	$	(2,068	)	$	14,464		$	-		$	-		$	(23,264	)	$	(5,881	)	$	123,621			176,951			70,079	$	70,079		(2,068	)	$	(2,068	)	$	14,464		$	-		$	-		$	(23,264	)	$	(5,881	)	$	123,621			176,951
Net Income																		30,233									30,233			30,233																			47,270									47,270			47,270
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments																		909												909																			607												607
Other Comprehensive Income																		909			909																												607			607
Comprehensive Income																	$	31,142																														$	47,877
Cash Dividends																											(8,556	)		(8,556	)																											(12,790	)		(12,790	)
Common Stock Purchased (2)						(879	)		(879	)					(3,655	)											(12,452	)		(16,986	)						(1,007	)		(1,007	)					(3,655	)											(14,790	)		(19,452	)
Issuance of 401(k) Company Match						176			176						3,655															3,831							177			177						3,655															3,832
FAS 123R adoption												(5,881	)											5,881						-													(5,881	)											5,881						-
Stock Compensation		293		293								1,213															25			1,531			286		286								1,973															25			2,284
Common Stock Options Exercised		273		273								(195	)																	78			316		316								(189	)																	127
Non-Qualified Stock Options												50																		50													50																		50
Balance at June 30, 2006		70,645	$	70,645		(2,771	)	$	(2,771	)	$	9,651		$	-		$	-		$	(22,355	)	$	-		$	132,871			188,041
Balance at September 30, 2006																																	70,681	$	70,681		(2,898	)	$	(2,898	)	$	10,417		$	-		$	-		$	(22,657	)	$	-		$	143,336			198,879

(1) Includes translation adjustment (net of tax) of $1,683,000 relating to non-current assets as of December 31, 2003.	(1) Includes translation adjustment (net of tax) of $1,683,000 relating to non-current assets as of December 31, 2003.																															(1) Includes translation adjustment (net of tax) of $1,683,000 relating to non-current assets as of December 31, 2003.
(2) Amounts charged to Retained Earnings are from purchases of the Company’s Common Stock.	(2) Amounts charged to Retained Earnings are from purchases of the Company’s Common Stock.																															(2) Amounts charged to Retained Earnings are from purchases of the Company’s Common Stock.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.	The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.																															The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Basis of Preparation - The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Rollins, Inc. (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reporting on Form 10-Q. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 94, “Consolidation of All Majority-Owned ~~Subsidiaries~~Subsidiaries” (“SFAS 94”) and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X. In accordance with SFAS 94 and Rule 3A-02(a) of Regulation S-X, the Company’s policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries and investees where it has voting control. The Company does not have any subsidiaries or investees where it has less than a 100% equity interest or less than 100% voting control, nor does it have any interest in other investees, joint ventures, or other variable interest entities that require consolidation under FASB interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest ~~Entities~~Entities” (FIN ~~46)~~46R).

Footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements included herein contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the results of its operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005 and cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.

The Company has only one reportable segment, its pest and termite control business. The Company’s results of operations and its financial condition are not reliant upon any single customer or a few customers or the Company’s foreign operations.

Estimates Used in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements—The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying notes and financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company considers all investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments, all of which are cash equivalents, are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value.

~~Marketable Securities—~~From time to time, the Company maintains investments held by several large, well-capitalized financial institutions. The Company’s investment policy does not allow investment in any securities rated less than “investment grade” by national rating services.

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and re-evaluates such designations as of each balance sheet date. Debt securities are classified as available-for-sale because the Company does not have the intent to hold the securities to maturity. Available-for-sale securities are stated at their fair values, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on securities classified as available-for-sale are included in interest income. The Company’s marketable securities generally consist of United States government, corporate and municipal debt securities.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible ~~Assets~~Assets”, the Company classifies intangible assets into three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization; (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization; and (3) goodwill. The Company does not amortize intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate the assets might be impaired. Such conditions may include an economic downturn or a change in the assessment of future operations. The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at the company level. Such impairment tests for goodwill include comparing the fair value of the appropriate reporting unit (the Company) with its carrying value. The Company performs impairment tests for indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset unit to its carrying value. The Company recognizes an impairment charge if the asset’s carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company completed its annual impairment analyses as of September 30, ~~2005.~~2006. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its goodwill or other intangible assets was indicated.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - In accordance with SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived ~~Assets~~Assets”, the Company’s long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets with definite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Based upon the results of these analyses, the Company has concluded that no impairment of its long-lived assets was indicated.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)—Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) results from foreign currency translations, unrealized gain/losses on marketable securities and changes in the minimum pension liability.

Franchising Program– - Orkin ~~began its franchising program in 1994 and~~ had 5657 franchises as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, including international franchises in Mexico, established in 2000, Panama, established in 2003, and ~~a new franchise in~~ Costa Rica, established in ~~June~~ 2006. Transactions with franchises involve sales of customer contracts to establish new franchises, initial franchise fees and royalties. The customer contracts and initial franchise fees are typically sold for a combination of cash and notes due over periods ranging up to ~~five~~5 years. Notes receivable from franchises aggregated ~~$5.5~~$5.1 million, $5.5 million, and ~~$5.6~~$5.9 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005, and ~~June~~September 30, 2005, respectively. The Company recognizes gains from the sale of customer contracts at the time they are sold to ~~franchises~~franchisees and collection on the notes is reasonably assured. ~~The Company had~~Such amounts are included as a ~~net gain~~component of approximately $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2006, compared to a $0.1 million net loss in the second quarter of 2005, and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, and included as revenues in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. The Company incurred losses from sale of pest control customers of approximately $32,000 in the third quarter of 2006, compared to a $0.5 million gain in the third quarter of 2005, and a $0.7 million gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to a $1.6 million gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Initial franchise fees are deferred for the duration of the initial contract period and are included as unearned revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Deferred franchise fees amounted to $2.0 million, $1.9 million, and ~~$1.8~~$1.9 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005, and ~~June~~September 30, 2005, respectively. Royalties from franchises are accrued and recognized as revenues as earned on a monthly basis. Revenues from royalties were ~~$0.6 million~~$572,000 in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 compared to ~~$0.6 million~~$549,000 in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 and were ~~$1.1~~$1.7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 compared to ~~$1.0~~$1.5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss relating to the franchises notes aggregated ~~$3.5~~$3.1 million, $3.5 million, and ~~$3.8~~$4.0 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2006, December 31, 2005 and ~~June~~September 30, 2005, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, short-term investments, marketable securities, trade and notes receivables, accounts payable and other short-term liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate their fair values.

Seasonality— The business of the Company is affected by the seasonal nature of the Company’s pest and termite control services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as well as the metamorphosis of termites in the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the revenue of the Company’s pest and termite control operations during such periods as evidenced by the following chart. ~~In addition, revenues were favorably impacted in 2004 after the acquisition of Western Pest Services on April 30, 2004.~~

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per ~~Share~~Share” (“EPS”), the Company presents basic EPS and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed on the basis of weighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed on the basis of weighted-average shares outstanding plus common stock options outstanding and unvested restricted stock awards during the period which, if exercised or vested, would have a dilutive effect on EPS. Basic and diluted EPS have been restated for the March 10, 2005, three-for-two stock split for all periods ~~presented (See Note 1).~~presented. A reconciliation of the number of weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted EPS is as follows:

	Three months ended				Six months ended				Three months ended				Nine months ended
	June 30,				June 30,				September 30,				September 30,
(in thousands except per share data)	2006		2005		2006		2005		2006		2005		2006		2005
Basic and diluted earnings available to stockholders (numerator):	$	19,330	$	18,724	$	30,233	$	30,321	$	17,037	$	15,100	$	47,270	$	45,421
Shares (denominator):
Weighted-average shares outstanding - Basic		67,556		67,937		67,243		67,940		67,068		68,117		67,184		68,000
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options and restricted shares		1,687		2,092		1,797		2,106		1,632		1,925		1,742		2,046

Weighted-average shares outstanding – Diluted		69,243		70,029		69,040		70,046		68,700		70,042		68,926		70,046

Per share amounts:
Basic income per common share	$	0.29	$	0.28	$	0.45	$	0.45	$	0.25	$	0.22	$	0.70	$	0.67
Diluted income per common shares	$	0.28	$	0.27	$	0.44	$	0.43	$	0.25	$	0.22	$	0.69	$	0.65

~~The Company bought back 667,908 shares of~~In the ~~Company’s common stock in the second~~third quarter of 2006, ~~under its authorized repurchase program.~~the Company announced that it repurchased 127,306 shares of common stock with a total of 1,006,680 shares repurchased year to date. Rollins has had a buyback program in place for a number of years and has routinely purchased shares when it felt the opportunity was desirable. The Board authorized the purchase of 4 million additional shares of the Company’s common stock at its quarterly meeting on ~~April~~October 26, 2005. ~~A total of 2,385,950~~Approximately 2.3 million shares remain authorized for purchase. The stock buy-back program has no expiration date.

In ~~July~~June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, ~~“Accounting~~“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income ~~Taxes—~~Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently ~~evaluating~~assessing the ~~effects~~impact of FIN ~~48. The potential impact~~48 on ~~the~~its consolidated financial ~~condition~~statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This Statement clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the disclosures of fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or ~~results~~underfunded status of ~~operations has not been determined.~~

a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 158 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of effects of the prior year misstatement in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The SEC staff believes registrants must quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a material misstatement, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered. SAB 108 is effective for the first annual period ending after November 15, 2006 with early application encouraged. The Company plans to adopt SAB 108 at its fiscal year-end December 31, 2006. The Company does not believe the adoption of SAB 108 will have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Orkin, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, is a named defendant in Mark and Christine Butland et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al. pending in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida. The plaintiffs filed suit in March of 1999 and are seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Court ruled in early April 2002, certifying the class action lawsuit against Orkin. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to the trial court for further findings. In December 2004 the Court issued a new ruling certifying the class action. Orkin appealed this new ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals. In June 2006, the Florida Second District Court of Appeals issued a ruling denying certification of the class. The Plaintiffs have moved for a rehearing from the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which Orkin has opposed. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Additionally, in the normal course of business, Orkin is a defendant in a number of lawsuits, which allege that plaintiffs have been damaged as a result of the rendering of services by Orkin. Orkin is actively contesting these actions. Some lawsuits or arbitrations have been filed (Ernest W. Warren and Dolores G. Warren, et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al.; and Francis D. Petsch, et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al.) in which the plaintiffs are seeking certification of a class. The cases originate in Georgia and Florida. In ~~Cynthia Garrett v.~~Warren, the Superior Court of Cobb County, Marietta, Georgia, ruled in August 2006, certifying the class action against Orkin. Orkin ~~Inc., an arbitration originating in Florida in which~~is appealing this ruling to the ~~plaintiff was seeking certification~~Georgia Court of ~~a class,~~ ~~the arbitrators, in July 2006, issued a ruling denying certification of the class.~~

~~The Company~~Appeals. Orkin believes these ~~matters~~cases to be without merit and intends to ~~vigorously contest certification and~~ defend itself vigorously through trial, ~~or arbitration,~~ if necessary. InAt this time, the final outcome of the litigation cannot be determined. However, in the opinion of management, the ~~outcome~~ultimate resolution of these ~~actions~~matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Orkin is involved in certain environmental matters primarily arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company’s liability under any of these matters would not materially affect its financial condition or results of operations. Consistent with the Company’s responsibilities under these regulations, the Company undertakes environmental assessments and remediation of hazardous substances from time to time as the Company determines its responsibilities for these purposes. As these situations arise, the Company accrues management’s best estimate of future costs for these activities. Based on management’s current estimates of these costs, management does not believe these costs are material to the Company’s financial condition or operating results or liquidity.

During the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the Company repurchased ~~667,908~~127,306 shares for ~~$12.9~~$2.5 million under its stock repurchase program. Also, during the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~and June 30, 2005,~~ approximately ~~0.2~~0.1 million shares ~~and 0.4 millions shares, respectively,~~ of common stock were issued upon exercise of stock options by employees. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005, the Company issued approximately 0.1 million shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options by employees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, ~~and six~~the Company has purchased over 1.0 millions shares of common shares at a weighted average price of $19.32 per share. Also, the nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, the Company has issued approximately 0.5 million shares ~~and 0.9~~of common stock upon exercise of stock options by employees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company issued approximately 1.1 million shares ~~respectively,~~ of common stock upon exercise of stock options by employees.

Stock options and time lapse restricted shares ~~(TLRSs)~~(TLRS’s) have been issued to officers and other management employees under the Company’s Employee Stock Incentive Plans. The stock options generally vest over a five-year period and expire ten years from the issuance date.

~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s provide for the issuance of a share of the Company’s Common Stock at no cost to the holder and generally vest after a certain stipulated number of years from the grant date, depending on the terms of the issue. The Company issued ~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s that vest over ten years prior to 2004. ~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s issued 2004 and later vest in 20 percent increments starting with the second anniversary of the grant, over six years from the date of grant. During these years, grantees receive all dividends declared and retain voting rights for the granted shares. The agreements under which the restricted stock is issued provide that shares awarded may not be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions established under the plans have lapsed.

The Company issues new shares from its authorized but unissued share pool. At ~~June~~September 30, 2006, approximately 4.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved for issuance.

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), which requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for all equity awards granted including stock options and ~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant date. SFAS 123R supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, ~~“Accounting~~“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, ~~“Accounting~~“Accounting for Stock Issued to ~~Employees”~~Employees” (“APB 25”). The Company has adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method of adoption which requires the Company to record compensation cost related to unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2005 by recognizing the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the remaining service periods of those awards with no change in historical reported earnings. Awards granted after December 31, 2005 are valued at fair value in accordance with provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a straight line basis over the service periods of each award. The Company estimated forfeiture rates for the third quarter of 2006 based on its historical experience.

Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with APB 25 using the intrinsic value method, which did not require that compensation cost be recognized for the Company’s stock options provided the option exercise price was established at 100% of the common stock fair market value on the date of grant. Under APB 25, the Company was required to record expense over the vesting period for the fair value of ~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s granted. Prior to 2006, the Company provided pro forma disclosure, as if the fair value method defined by SFAS No. 123 had been applied to its stock-based compensation. The Company’s net income and net income per share for the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005 would have been reduced if compensation cost related to stock options had been recorded in the financial statements based on fair value at the grant dates.

The following pro forma net income and earnings per share (or “EPS”) were determined as if the Company had accounted for employee stock options and stock issued under its employee stock plans using the fair value method prescribed by SFAS 123.

In order to estimate the fair value of stock options, the Company used the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which was developed for use in estimating the fair value of publicly traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions and these assumptions can vary over time.

The only options outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2006 for SFAS 123R purposes are the grants issued during the first quarters of 2002 and 2003. The Company did not grant any stock options in any years following the 2003 ~~grant;~~grant, therefore no Black-Scholes calculation was necessary.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, the impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Net Income for the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 was ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million (net of ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million tax benefit) ~~and $0.3 million (net of $0.2 million tax benefit)~~ lower, ~~respectively,~~ than if the Company had continued to account for stock – based compensation under APB 25. There was no impact to both basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006. Pro forma net income ~~for 2005~~ as if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards is as follows:

	Three months ended					Six months ended					Three months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,					June 30,					September 30,						June 30,
(in thousands except per share data)	2006		2005 Pro forma			2006		2005 Pro forma			2006			2005 Pro forma			2006			2005 Pro forma
Net income as reported	$	19,330	$	18,724		$	30,233	$	30,321		$	17,037		$	15,100		$	47,270		$	45,421

Pro forma adjustments:
Add: Stock-based compensation programs recorded as expense, net of tax		-		186			-		373			461			185			1,361			555
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense, net of tax		-		(332	)		-		(665	)		(461	)		(332	)		(1,361	)		(1,008	)
Pro forma net income	$	19,330	$	18,578		$	30,233	$	30,029		$	17,037		$	14,953		$	47,270		$	44,968

Earnings per share:
Basic income per common share	$	0.29	$	0.28		$	0.45	$	0.45		$	0.25		$	0.22		$	0.70		$	0.67
Diluted income per common shares	$	0.28	$	0.27		$	0.44	$	0.43		$	0.25		$	0.22		$	0.69		$	0.65

Pro forma basic income per common share	$	0.29	$	0.27		$	0.45	$	0.44		$	0.25		$	0.22		$	0.70		$	0.66
Pro forma diluted income per common shares	$	0.28	$	0.27		$	0.44	$	0.43		$	0.25		$	0.21		$	0.69		$	0.64

The following table summarizes the components of the Company’s stock-based compensation programs recorded as expense ($ in thousands):

	Three months ended						Six months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Time Lapse Restricted Stock:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	522		$	310		$	1,044		$	621		$	525		$	311		$	1,569		$	932
Tax benefit		(211	)		(124	)		(423	)		(248	)		(204	)		(126	)		(621	)		(377	)
Restricted stock expense, net of tax	$	311		$	186		$	621		$	373		$	321		$	185		$	948		$	555

Stock options:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	304		$	-		$	456		$	-		$	228		$	-		$	684		$	-
Tax benefit		(123	)		-			(185	)		-			(88	)		-			(271	)		-
Stock option expense, net of tax	$	181		$	-		$	271		$	-		$	140		$	-		$	413		$	-

Total Share-Based Compensation:
Pre-tax compensation expense	$	826		$	310		$	1,500		$	621		$	753		$	311		$	2,253		$	932
Tax benefit		(334	)		(124	)		(608	)		(248	)		(292	)		(126	)		(892	)		(377	)
Total share-based compensation expense, net of tax	$	492		$	186		$	892		$	373		$	461		$	185		$	1,361		$	555

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, ~~$11.0~~$10.4 million and ~~$0.8~~$0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to time lapse restricted shares and stock options, respectively, is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately ~~4.9~~4.6 years for ~~TLRSs~~TLRS’s and ~~1.5~~1.3 years for stock options.

~~Option~~Options activity outstanding under the Company’s stock option plan as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and changes during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 were as follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2005		2,539		$	9.24		3.98				2,539		$	9.24		3.98
Granted		-			N/A		N/A				-			N/A		N/A
Exercised		(484	)		8.80		N/A				(547	)		8.88		N/A
Forfeited		(20	)		9.84		N/A				(58	)		8.84		N/A
Outstanding at June 30, 2006		2,035		$	9.34		3.43	$	20,951
Exercisable at June 30, 2006		1,649		$	8.99		2.79	$	17,569
Outstanding at September 30, 2006											1,934			9.36		3.09		22,721
Exercisable at September 30, 2006											1,552			8.99		2.38		18,815

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on ~~June~~September 30, 2006. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarters ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and ~~June~~September 30, 2005 was ~~$2.0~~$0.7 million and ~~$5.1~~$1.7 million, respectively. Exercise of options during the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 and 2005 resulted in cash receipts of ~~$0.8 million~~$37 thousand and ~~$1.7~~$0.7 million, respectively. The Company recognized a tax benefit of approximately $0.3 million in the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 related to the exercise of employee stock options, which has been recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

The following table summarizes information on unvested restricted stock units outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006:

	Number of Shares (in thousands)		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Number of Shares (in thousands)		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Unvested Restricted Stock Units
Unvested as of December 31, 2005	477		$	16.10	477			16.10
Forfeited	(3	)		13.48	(9	)		15.91
Vested	(55	)		15.51	(55	)		15.51
Granted	296			21.17	296			21.17
Unvested at end of quarter	715		$	18.25	709			18.26

In accordance with SFAS 5, ~~“Accounting~~“Accounting for Contingencies,” the Company maintains an accrual for termite contracts representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repair claims and associated labor, chemicals, and other costs relative to termite control services performed prior to the balance sheet date.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the accrual for termite contracts is as follows:

	Six months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						September 30,
(in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Beginning balance	$	23,200		$	25,311		$	23,200		$	25,311
Current year provision		8,292			9,527			14,906			11,089
Settlements, claims and expenditures		(7,292	)		(8,928	)		(18,806	)		(12,352	)
Ending balance	$	24,200		$	25,910		$	19,300		$	24,048

The following represents the net periodic pension benefit costs and related components in accordance with SFAS 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement ~~Benefits:~~Benefits”:

Components of Net Pension Benefit Cost	Components of Net Pension Benefit Cost												Components of Net Pension Benefit Cost
	Three months ended						Six months ended						Three months ended						Nine months ended
	June 30,						June 30,						September 30,						September 30,
(in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005
Service Cost	$	-		$	1,397		$	-		$	2,794		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	2,794
Interest Cost		2,035			2,208			4,069			4,416			2,035			1,975			6,104			6,392
Expected return on plan assets		(2,684	)		(2,464	)		(5,368	)		(4,928	)		(2,684	)		(2,468	)		(8,052	)		(7,396	)
Amortization of prior service benefit		-			(217	)		-			(434	)		-			-			-			(434	)
Unrecognized Net Loss		890			1,164			1,782			2,328			890			1,112			2,672			3,440
Net periodic benefit cost		241			2,088			483			4,177			241			619			724			4,796
SFAS 88 Curtailment Gain		-			(4,176	)		-			(4,176	)		-						-			(4,176	)
Total	$	241		$	(2,088	)	$	483		$	1		$	241		$	619		$	724		$	620

In June 2005, the Company recorded a $4.2 million non-cash curtailment gain in accordance with SFAS No. 88, ~~“Employer’s~~“Employer’s Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination ~~Benefits”~~Benefits”, (“SFAS No. 88”) in connection with freezing the defined benefit pension plan, and using actuarial assumptions consistent with those used at December 31, 2004. SFAS No. 88 requires curtailment accounting if an event eliminates, for a significant number of employees, the accrual of defined benefits for some or all of their future services. In the event of a curtailment, an adjustment must be recognized for the unrecognized prior service cost associated with years of service no longer expected to be rendered.

The Company determines its periodic income tax expense based upon the current period income and the annual estimated tax rate for the Company, adjusted for any change to prior year estimates. The estimated tax rate is revised, if necessary, as of the end of each successive interim period during the fiscal year to the Company’s current annual estimated tax rate.

The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax years 2002 and 2003. The IRS has issued Notices of Proposed Adjustment with respect to various issues. The Company is currently reviewing its position regarding the adjustments and plans to defend against those adjustments that are without merit. The Company does not expect the resolution of these issues, taken individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

The Company experienced revenue growth of ~~8.4%~~8.8% for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 as compared to the ~~second~~third quarter 2005. Revenues in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 were ~~$232.2~~$227.8 million compared to ~~$214.3~~$209.3 million for the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005. Excluding the ~~$7.6~~$8.8 million revenue contribution of the Industrial Fumigant Company (IFC) for ~~second~~third quarter of 2006, the Company’s organic revenues grew ~~4.8%~~4.6%. IFC contributed revenue of $8.8 million, up from $7.6 million ~~up substantially from last quarter.~~in the second quarter of 2006. The Company’s investment in sales and marketing are the driving force behind this growth. This past quarter’s organic sales growth was the Company’s best in a number of years.

The Company experienced increased revenues in ~~all~~the three primary areas of business with the principal contributor being Commercial Pest ~~Control~~Control.. The primary reason for the increase in revenue ~~was~~is the ~~result~~commitment of our employees to implementing the initiatives that we have put in place over the past few years. As our increase in revenues indicate these initiatives are taking root. The Company’s newly hired sales and management team continues to share in increasing the growth of the ~~investment made in sales and marketing.~~Company’s revenues. The Company has ~~added~~also continued to emphasize technician sales which are up 16% in 2006 and are on track to have technicians add over ~~100 new sales~~50,000 customers and ~~sales management employees this year. These individuals along with more attention given to sales management in general are driving results.~~over $20 million of related revenue for the year ended December 31, 2006.

~~Rollins recorded net income~~Commercial business, which represented almost 43% of ~~$19.3 million, or $0.28 per diluted share for~~ the ~~second quarter ended June 30, 2006, compared to $18.7 million, or $0.27 per diluted share for the second quarter ended June 30, 2005. Included~~Company’s overall business in the ~~second~~third quarter, ~~of last year’s results was a $2.5 million gain, net of taxes, or $0.04 per diluted share, as the Company curtailed Rollins, Inc.’s pension plan effective June 30, 2005. Excluding~~grew 17.1% including the impact of the ~~pension curtailment gain in 2005, the Company’s net income increased 19.0% or $.05 per diluted share compared to the same period last year.~~

~~The Company’s commercial business represented just under 41% of our overall business in the second quarter~~IFC acquisition and grew ~~16.5% including~~5.5% excluding the contribution of IFC, ~~commercial revenues and 7.2% excluding IFC revenues~~ as compared to the Company’s ~~commercial revenues in~~third quarter 2005. Residential Pest Control which represents almost 39% of the business, showed the greatest growth, increasing 6.1%, up from the second quarter ~~2005. The~~when it grew 4.7%. Pest control gross contract revenue (GCR) is the Company’s ~~other service lines, residential pest control (which represents almost 36%~~monthly recurring revenue. Going into the fourth quarter the Company doesn’t expect to net add new customers, so the amount of GCR carry into this slow period is important. With the growth of the ~~overall business) increased 4.7% over~~last three quarters the ~~prior~~Company will carry a 5.2% GCR advantage into the fourth quarter versus 1.2% a year ~~quarter and 3.3% over~~ago. One of the ~~immediately proceeding quarter while termite (which~~strengths of our Company is the amount of recurring revenue it enjoys. Termite revenue which contributed around ~~22%~~18% of the ~~overall business) increased less than 1% over the Company’s termite revenue in the second quarter 2005.~~business was basically flat.

Gross margin for the quarter improved to ~~48.7% versus 46.7%~~47.7% in the ~~second~~third quarter ~~2005.~~of 2006 versus 47.4% last year. The increase in margins is due to ~~more~~ favorable ~~claim experience,~~group medical costs, reduced material and supply ~~cost,~~costs, and ~~personnel related costs~~reduced service salaries. This was partially offset ~~partially~~ by increased ~~service salaries~~fleet, claim experience and the addition of IFC.

Rollins recorded net income of $17.0 million, or $0.25 per diluted share for the ~~Industrial Fumigant Company.~~third quarter ended September 30, 2006, compared to $15.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted share for the third quarter ended September 30, 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 the Company recorded net income of $47.3 million with diluted earnings per share of $0.69 compare to net income $45.4 million with diluted earnings per share of $0.65 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Excluding the impact of the non-cash pension curtailment gain in 2005, the Company’s earnings per share increased $0.08, or 13.1% compared to the prior nine month period.

SG&A expense ~~increased~~decreased to ~~32.0%~~32.7% of revenues in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 from ~~31.5%~~32.8% of revenues in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2005 ~~due to~~as the lower SG&A of IFC as well as favorable group medical costs, reduced cost of our summer sales program and lower bad debt expense more than offset the higher salary expense related to approximately 100 plus associates the Company added to its sales ~~force and an increase in bad debt expense over last year.~~force.

Depreciation and amortization totaled ~~$6.9~~$6.7 million for the ~~second~~third quarter ended September 30, 2006 with amortization of intangibles at $3.5 million and depreciation at ~~$3.4~~$3.2 million. The amortization of intangibles (primarily customer contracts valued at time of the acquisition) represents a significant non-cash charge to the ~~Consolidated Statement of Income.~~income statement. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company writes off the value assigned to customer contracts acquired in acquisitions over their economic life while fully expensing all costs in acquiring new customers internally. In 2006 total amortization of intangibles expense should be approximately $14.0 ~~million, versus $12.8 million in 2005.~~million. Based upon our fully diluted shares outstanding, it will represent a non cash after tax charge of $0.12 to GAAP earnings per share this year.

The tax provision for the ~~second~~third quarter was ~~40.0%~~38.8% down from 40.5% for the ~~second~~third quarter 2005.

The Company’s balance sheet remains strong. Cash and cash equivalents are ~~down this quarter to $37.2~~$53.8 million with practically no debt. Cash flow remains very strong. Net cash provided by operating activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 totaled ~~$34.3~~$62.9 million, decreasing ~~$6.1~~$7.7 million over the same period last year. The decrease was due primarily to two factors. One factor was an increase in accounts receivable of ~~$5.8~~$6.6 million. This was primarily due to the increase in revenues and a system conversion for the Company’s Canadian operations which delayed billing and collections. The Company is working to bring that back in ~~line in the next quarter.~~line. The other factor was a decision made to fund the Company’s frozen pension plan earlier this year. The Company added a full contribution of $5.0 million in the second quarter this year, while the 2005 contribution was made in the fourth quarter.

The Company’s Pest Control customer retention is tracking to achieve the best year ever. The Company has improvement in termite customer retention as well, primarily as a result of our new “term contract” sales program. Thousands of Orkin ~~was recognized~~termite customers have guarantees that are expiring, and Orkin has a great opportunity to renew their protection and keep them as a customer. In support of increasing the Company’s termite control growth rate, Rollins has formed a Termite Advisory Counsel involving some of our best field and home office employees to develop additional ways to increase termite revenue and ensure excellence in ~~July 2006 by PCT magazine, one~~new related products and services. At the same time, our worker retention continues to improve as it has for the past 5 years or more.

The Company recognizes that an important piece of customer service is adapting to our customers’ needs, lifestyles and desires. The first steps in this regard are to make it easy for them to find Orkin, to provide easy access to the services they want, and to be the first company they think of when they are considering any type of pest control service. To that end, many customers are finding Orkin on the internet, and as a result, the Company is receiving an ever increasing number of inquiries concerning its programs and services. Currently, the Company is projecting its web site will generate a seventy percent increase in leads over the Company’s 2005 web leads. Additionally this year two-thirds of the ~~industry’s leading trade magazines,~~Company’s pest control leads will come from divisional call centers and ~~Syngenta (a leading pesticide manufacturer) with their annual Best-in-Class~~branches, while the remaining one-third will come via 1-800 phone numbers and web inquires handled by our National Orkin Customer Service ~~Award. An independent panel~~Center. Today a growing amount, though still less than half, of our termite control leads will also come to us through the Orkin Customer Service Center as well.

The Company is using the internet to market to commercial customers as well. Recently the Company launched email campaigns to current customers and prospective customers to further demonstrate our expertise in targeted industry ~~consultants~~service lines. Rollins is learning, as other companies, that the internet provides numerous opportunities to attain and ~~pest control operators’ selected Orkin as the winner~~retain customers. One of the ~~“large company” category consisting~~Company’s national accounts with a large franchise network has created a web site so their franchisees can purchase Orkin services directly through their company’s internal intranet site. An important way for Orkin to create faster growth is by doing a better job of ~~companies with over $6 million in annual revenue. This is a very meaningful award because there are over 70 excellent pest control companies with revenues over $6 million.~~

converting phone and web leads to customers through quicker response, more effective communication, and customized service offerings.

IFC’s integration into the organization is going well. IFC made a meaningful revenue contribution during the quarter. IFC was also accretive in the quarter and is an important link to the Company’s strategy to grow the high end food manufacturer and processor line of our business. PCO of Canada and Western Pest Control, other previously acquired businesses, are also performing very well.

~~In early April 2002, the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County certified the class action status of~~ ~~Butland et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. et al.~~ Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to the trial court for further findings. In December 2004 the Court issued a new ruling certifying the class action. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which in June 2006 denied certification of the class. In ~~Cynthia Garrett v. Orkin, Inc., an arbitration originating in Florida in which the plaintiff was seeking certification of a class, the arbitrators in July 2006, issued a ruling denying certification of the class.~~

The Company is dedicating more time and effort to select and hire good people, and our award winning training is helping us keep them. In addition to helping the Company retain employees, our training initiatives are a key component to improving customer service and customer tenure. The Company continues to ~~work~~expand and improve its training programs, whose centerpiece is the launch of “Orkin TV”, our interactive satellite television communications. This company-wide network links 8,000 employees through a live, and “video on demand” broadcast technology. In recognition of this tremendous training investment, Orkin’s Vice President of Learning was recognized with ~~various universities and organizations~~the Learning Practice “Silver Award” in the ~~development of safer and more effective products and improving methods of pest treatments. Recently, Orkin was recognized~~Learning Innovation category. The Learning Practice award competition is sponsored by the University of Florida this quarter for exceptional support of educational programs in Urban Entomology. Additionally, some of Orkin’s employees recently had an opportunity to further safeguard the health and properties for the citizens of New Orleans. Almost one year after the devastating effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the city of New Orleans, Louisiana, many of the former residents are under pressure to either occupy or demolish their homes. In an effort to help some of these individuals begin to reclaim and rebuild their severely damaged homes and lives, Orkin partnered with the National Center for Healthy Housing, Catholic Charities and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) to treat homes for mold and mildew.

Mold is a key problem for New Orleans residents. During a week in June, the Orkin Ready Response Team, a group of 13 volunteer employees with extensive knowledge, training and years of experience in the pest control industry, treated over 75 severely damaged homes for mold contamination. The low toxicity products they applied to arrest mold also had a secondary benefit of discouraging termite activity.

The Company is pleased to have been a part of this effort and especially appreciate the dedication of Orkin’s volunteers involved in this and other New Orleans projects for the giving of their time to assist the homeowners of this area who are desperately in need of assistance.

Franchises continue to play an important role in the Company’s growth and the expansion of the Orkin brand. In June Orkin established its third international franchise. The new franchise is located in Costa Rica, which increases the number of Orkin franchises to 56, three of which are international. The Company will continue to strategically add franchises both internationally and in the secondary U.S. markets as the Company expands its business and brand.

The Company’s routing and scheduling initiatives have proven to be, like many technology endeavors, more complex than initially anticipated. The Company had anticipated beginning a “conference room pilot” with live data in July 2006. In setting up the pilot earlier this month a software problem was uncovered. The Company’s software developers are working to resolve this problem. The Company hopes to begin the pilot program in the very near future. While this delay is disappointing, the Company is most enthusiastic concerning the opportunity and benefits this initiative will provide once fully implemented.Chief Learning Officer magazine.

During the ~~second~~third quarter Rollins ~~Inc.~~ purchased an additional ~~667,908~~127,306 shares of common shares at a weighted average price of ~~$19.26~~$19.36 per share. In total, ~~2.4~~2.3 million additional shares may be purchased under programs previously approved by the Board of Directors. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company has purchased over 1.0 millions shares of common shares at a weighted average price of $19.32 per share.

Revenues for the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 increased to ~~$232.2~~$227.8 million, an increase of ~~$17.9~~$18.5 million or ~~8.4%~~8.8%. For the ~~second~~third quarter of 2006 the primary revenue drivers were the addition of the IFC, which was purchased on October 1, 2005 and contributed ~~$7.6~~$8.8 million in revenue, as well as an increase in Orkin revenues of $6.8 million. The Company’s foreign operations accounted for less than 8% of total revenues during the ~~second~~third quarter 2006 compared to less than 7%8% of the total during the ~~second~~third quarter 2005.

Year to Date revenues have increased 7.7% to $654.2 million, an increase of $46.6 million, of this the IFC acquisition contributed $19.8 million. Excluding revenues resulting from the IFC acquisition, revenues grew 4.4%.

The revenues of the Company are affected by the seasonal nature of the Company’s pest and termite control ~~services~~services. The increase in pest pressure and activity, as ~~described~~well as the metamorphosis of termites in ~~Note 1 to~~the spring and summer (the occurrence of which is determined by the timing of the change in seasons), has historically resulted in an increase in the revenue of the Company’s ~~financial statements above. The Company’s revenues as a historical matter tend to peak~~pest and termite control operations during ~~the second and third quarters,~~such periods as evidenced by the following chart.

Consolidated Net Revenues	Consolidated Net Revenues							Consolidated Net Revenues
(in thousands)	(in thousands)							(in thousands)
	Net Revenues							Net Revenues
		2006		2005		2004			2006		2005		2004
First Quarter	$	194,186	$	183,915	$	160,416	*	$	194,187	$	183,915	$	160,416	*
Second Quarter		232,222		214,326		202,725	*		232,222		214,326		202,725	*
Third Quarter		N/A		209,346		203,925	*		227,816		209,346		203,925	*
Fourth Quarter		N/A		194,830		183,818			N/A		194,830		183,818
Year ended December 31,	$	426,408	$	802,417	$	750,884		$	654,225	$	802,417	$	750,884

* Restated for change in accounting principle.	* Restated for change in accounting principle.							* Restated for change in accounting principle.

Cost of Services Provided for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 increased ~~$4.7~~$9.1 million or ~~4.1%~~8.3%, compared to the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2005, and expense expressed as a percentage of revenues decreased by 2.0 percentage points, representing 51.3% of revenues~~2005. Gross margin for the ~~second~~quarter improved to 47.7% for the third quarter 2006 ~~compared to 53.3% of revenues~~versus 47.4% in ~~the prior year’s second quarter. Cost of Services Provided as a percentage of revenues decreased~~last year. The increase in margins is due to ~~more~~ favorable ~~claim experience, improved productivity, and~~group medical costs, reduced ~~personnel related costs offset partially by increased~~ material and supply costs, and reduced service salaries. This was partially offset by increased claim experience and the addition of IFC related expenses.

Year to date Cost of Service Provided increased $20.6 million or 6.4%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005. Gross margin for the quarter improved to 47.2% for the first nine months of 2006 versus 46.6% in last year. The increase in margins is due to favorable insurance and claim experience, group medical costs and reduced materials and supplies costs. This was partially offset by higher fleet cost due to higher gasoline costs and the addition of ~~the~~ IFC ~~and fleet cost.~~related expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization expenses for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 increased by $0.9 million or 14.9% to ~~$6.9~~$6.7 million versus the prior year quarter. The increase for the quarter and year was due ~~in part~~primarily to the addition of the IFC.

Sales, General and Administrative Expenses for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 increased ~~$6.8~~$5.9 million or ~~10.0% compared~~8.6% to ~~the quarter ended June 30, 2005, and expense expressed as a percentage~~32.7% of revenues ~~increased by 0.5 percentage points, representing 32.0%~~from 32.8% of revenues for the ~~second~~third quarter ended September 30, 2005 as the lower sales, general and administrative costs of ~~2006~~IFC as well as favorable group medical costs, reduced cost of our summer sales program and lower bad debt expense more than offset the higher salary expense related to approximately 100 plus associates the Company added to its sales force

Year to date Sales, General and Administrative increased $16.5 million or 8.5%, compared to ~~31.5%~~the nine months ended September 30, 2005 representing 32.3% of revenues ~~in the prior year’s second quarter.~~compared to 32.1%. Sales, General and Administrative expenses as a percentage orof revenues increased due to higher sales and administrative salaries due to the expansion of ~~our~~the sales force and an increase in ~~bad debt expense over last year.~~

~~Pension Curtailment Gain~~ ~~for~~fleet cost. This was partially offset by the ~~second quarter ended June 30, 2006 was zero. During the second quarter~~lower sales, general and administrative costs of ~~2005, the Company recorded a $4.2 million non-cash pension curtailment gain.~~

~~ROLLINS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~IFC as well as favorable group medical costs, and reduced cost of our summer sales program.

Income Taxes for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 increased to ~~$12.9~~$10.8 million or ~~1.1%~~5.0% for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and reflects increased pre-tax income over the prior year period and a slight decrease in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate was ~~40.0%~~38.8% for the ~~second~~third quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 ~~and~~bringing our year to date effective rate to 39.6% versus 40.5% for the ~~second~~third quarter and year to date ended ~~June~~September 30, 2005.

The Company views its critical accounting policies to be those policies that are very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and that require management’s most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. The circumstances that make these judgments difficult or complex relate to the need for management to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company believes its critical accounting policies to be as follows:

Accrual for Termite Contracts— The Company maintains an accrual for termite claims representing the estimated costs of reapplications, repairs and associated labor and chemicals, settlements, awards and other costs relative to termite control services. Factors that may impact future cost include chemical life expectancy and government regulation. It is significant that the actual number of claims has decreased in recent years due to changes in the Company’s business practices. However, it is not possible to precisely predict future significant claims. Positive changes to our business practices include revisions made to our contracts, more effective treatment methods that include a directed-liquid and baiting program, more effective termiticides, and expanding training.

Accrued Insurance— The Company self-insures, up to specified limits, certain risks related to general liability, workers’ compensation and vehicle liability. The estimated costs of existing and future claims under the self-insurance program are accrued based upon historical trends as incidents occur, whether reported or unreported (although actual settlement of the claims may not be made until future periods) and may be subsequently revised based on developments relating to such claims. The Company contracts an independent third party actuary on an annual basis to provide the Company an estimated liability based upon historical claims information. The actuarial study is a major consideration, along with management’s knowledge of changes in business practices and existing claims compared to current balances. The reserve is established based on all these factors. Due to the uncertainty associated with the estimation of future loss and expense payments and inherent limitations of the data, actual developments may vary from the Company’s projections. This is particularly true since critical assumptions regarding the parameters used to develop reserve estimates are largely based upon judgment. Management’s judgment is inherently subjective and a number of factors are outside management’s knowledge and control. Therefore, changes in estimates may be material. Additionally, historical information is not always an accurate indication of future events. It should be noted that the number of claims has been decreasing due to the Company’s proactive risk management to develop and maintain ongoing programs. Initiatives that have been implemented include pre-employment screening and an annual motor vehicle report required on all its drivers, utilization of a Global Positioning System that has been fully deployed to our Company vehicles, post-offer physicals for new employees, and pre-hire, random and post-accident drug testing. The Company has improved the time required to report a claim by utilizing a “Red Alert” program that provides serious accident assessment twenty four hours a day and seven days a week and has instituted a modified duty program that enables employees to go back to work on a limited-duty basis.

Revenue Recognition— The Company’s revenue recognition policies are designed to recognize revenues at the time services are performed. For certain revenue types, because of the timing of billing and the receipt of cash versus the timing of performing services, certain accounting estimates are utilized. Residential and commercial pest control services are primarily recurring in nature on a monthly or bi-monthly basis, while certain types of commercial customers may receive multiple treatments within a given month. In general, pest control customers sign an initial one-year contract, and revenues are recognized at the time services are performed. For pest control customers, the Company offers a discount for those customers who prepay for a full year of services. The Company defers recognition of these advance payments and recognizes the revenue as the services are rendered. The Company classifies the discounts related to the advance payments as a reduction in revenues. Termite baiting revenues are recognized based on the delivery of the individual units of accounting. At the inception of a new baiting services contract upon quality control review of the installation, the Company recognizes revenue for the delivery of the monitoring stations, initial directed liquid termiticide treatment and installation of the monitoring services. The amount deferred is the fair value of monitoring services to be rendered after the initial service. The amount deferred for the undelivered monitoring element is then recognized as income on a straight-line basis over the remaining contract term, which results in recognition of revenue in a pattern that approximates the timing of performing monitoring visits. Baiting renewal revenue is deferred and recognized over the annual contract period on a straight-line basis that approximates the timing of performing the required monitoring visits.

Contingency Accruals— The Company is a party to legal proceedings with respect to matters in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for ~~Contingencies,~~Contingencies”, the Company estimates and accrues for its liability and costs associated with the litigation. Estimates and accruals are determined in consultation with outside counsel. It is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate result of the litigation. However, in the opinion of management, the outcome of the litigation will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Federal Income Tax Audit – The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax years 2002 and 2003. The IRS has issued Notices of Proposed Adjustment with respect to various issues. The Company is currently reviewing its position regarding the adjustments and plans to defend against those adjustments that are without merit. The Company does not expect the resolution of these issues, taken individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Cash and Cash Flow
	Six months ended June 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands)	2006			2005			2006			2005
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	34,321		$	40,399		$	62,861		$	70,539
Net cash used in investing activities		(15,970	)		(15,394	)		(20,137	)		(18,929	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(25,104	)		(15,720	)		(32,609	)		(29,603	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		909			(843	)		607			745
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(5,844	)		8,442
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents								10,722			22,752
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	37,221		$	65,179		$	53,787		$	79,489

The Company believes its current cash and cash equivalents balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings under its $70.0 million credit facilities will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund planned investments for expansion of the business for the foreseeable future. The Company’s operating activities generated net cash of ~~$34.3~~$62.9 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, compared with cash provided by operating activities of ~~$40.4~~$70.5 million for the same period in 2005.

At the April 26, 2005 meeting of the Board of Directors, as part of the Company’s active management of equity capital, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 4 million additional shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company plans to repurchase shares at times and prices considered appropriate by the Company. There is no expiration date for the share repurchase program. The Company repurchased ~~879,374~~1.0 million shares of Common Stock in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and there remain approximately ~~2.4~~2.3 million shares authorized to be repurchased.

The Company invested approximately ~~$11.4~~$15.7 million in capital expenditures during the ~~first six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, compared to ~~$14.2~~$17.0 million during the same period in 2005, and expects to invest between ~~$9.0~~$5.0 million and ~~$12.0~~$7.0 million for the remainder of 2006. Capital expenditures for the ~~first six~~nine months consisted primarily of building purchases and the purchase of equipment replacements. During the ~~first six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the Company made expenditures for acquisitions totaling ~~$5.0~~$5.1 million, compared to ~~$1.6~~$3.0 million during the same period in 2005. Expenditures for acquisitions for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 were funded by cash on hand. A total of ~~$8.6~~12.8 million was paid in cash dividends ($~~0.125~~0.1875 per share) during the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006, compared to ~~$6.9~~$10.3 million or ~~$0.10~~$0.15 per share during the same period in 2005. The capital expenditures and cash dividends were funded entirely through existing cash balances and operating activities. The Company received cash from the sale of franchises of ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million for the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 compared to $0.3 million in 2005. The Company maintains $70.0 million of credit facilities with commercial banks, of which no borrowings were outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 or ~~July~~October 15, 2006. The Company maintains approximately $41.2 million in letters of credit, which reduced its borrowing capacity under the credit facilities. These letters of credit are required by the Company’s fronting insurance companies and/or certain states, due to the Company’s self-insured status, to secure various workers’ compensation and casualty insurance contracts. These letters of credit are established by the bank for the Company’s fronting insurance companies as collateral, although the Company believes that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate such claims.

The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for tax years 2002 and 2003. The IRS has issued notices of proposed adjustment with respect to various issues. The Company is currently reviewing its position regarding the adjustments and plans to defend against those adjustments that are without merit. The Company does not expect the resolution of these issues, taken individually or in the aggregate, to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position

Orkin, one of the Company’s subsidiaries, is aggressively defending a class action lawsuit filed in Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida. In early April 2002, the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County certified the class action status of Butland et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. et al. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which remanded the case back to the trial court for further findings. In December 2004 the Court issued a new ruling certifying the class action. Orkin appealed this ruling to the Florida Second District Court of Appeals, which in June 2006 denied certification of the class. The Plaintiffs have moved for a rehearing from the Florida Second District Court of Appeals. Other lawsuits against Orkin, and in some instances the Company, are also being vigorously defended, including the Ernest W. Warren and Dolores G. Warren, et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al. and Francis D. Petsch, et al. v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc., et al. cases. In Warren, the ~~Cynthia Garrett v.~~Superior Court of Cobb County, Marietta, Georgia, ruled in August 2006 certifying the class action against Orkin. Orkin ~~Inc. arbitration~~is appealing this ruling to the ~~Plaintiff was seeking class certification, but~~Georgia Court of Appeals. Orkin believes these cases to be without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously through trial, if necessary. At this time, the ~~arbitrators denied certification~~final outcome of the ~~class~~litigation cannot be determined. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. For further discussion, see the Contingencies section in ~~July 2006.~~the notes to the Company financial statements set forth under Item 1 of Part I, above.

In ~~July~~June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, ~~“Accounting~~“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. ~~109”~~109” (“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently ~~evaluating~~assessing the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).” SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur. SFAS No. 158 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 158 on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued SAB No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB 108 provides guidance on the consideration of effects of ~~FIN 48.~~the prior year misstatement in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The ~~potential~~SEC staff believes registrants must quantify errors using both a balance sheet and income statement approach and evaluate whether either approach results in a material misstatement, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered. SAB 108 is effective for the first annual period ending after November 15, 2006 with early application encouraged. The Company plans to adopt SAB 108 at its fiscal year-end December 31, 2006. The Company does not believe the adoption of SAB 108 will have a material impact on ~~the consolidated financial condition or results of operations has not been determined.~~its Consolidated Financial Statements.

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding management’s expectation regarding the effect of the ultimate resolution of pending legal actions on the Company’s financial position, results of operation and liquidity; management’s belief that future costs of the Company for environmental matters will not be material to the Company’s financial condition, operating results, and liquidity; management’s expectation regarding the Company’s expense for amortization of intangibles during 2006; the Company’s plan to strategically add franchises both internationally and in the secondary U.S. markets as the Company expands its business and brand; the Company’s plan to begin the pilot program for its routing and scheduling project in the very near future; the Company’s belief that its current cash and cash equivalent balances, future cash flows expected to be generated from operating activities and available borrowings will be sufficient to finance its current operations and obligations, and fund planned investments for expansion of the business for the foreseeable future; ~~expected investments for the remainder of 2006;~~ the Company’s belief that it has adequate liquid assets, funding sources and insurance accruals to accommodate various workers compensation and casualty insurance contracts; and the Company’s expectation that adjustments resulting from an audit by the IRS for tax years 2002 and 2003 will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. The actual results of the Company could differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements because of various risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, the possibility of an adverse ruling against the Company in pending litigation; general economic conditions; market risk; changes in industry practices or technologies; the degree of success of the Company’s termite process reforms and pest control selling and treatment methods; the Company’s ability to identify and integrate potential acquisitions; climate and weather conditions; competitive factors and pricing practices; potential increases in labor costs; and changes in various government laws and regulations, including environmental regulations. All of the foregoing risks and uncertainties are beyond the ability of the Company to control, and in many cases the Company cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. A more detailed discussion of potential risks facing the Company can be found in the Company’s Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company does not undertake to update its forward looking statements.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, the Company maintained an investment portfolio (included in cash and cash equivalents) subject to short-term interest rate risk exposure. The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure through borrowings on its $70.0 million credit facilities. Due to the absence of such borrowings as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, this risk was not significant in the first ~~six~~nine months of 2006 and is not expected to have a material effect upon the Company’s results of operations or financial position going forward. The Company is also exposed to market risks arising from changes in foreign exchange rates. The Company believes that this foreign exchange rate risk will not have a material effect upon the Company’s results of operations going forward. There have been no material changes to the Company’s market risk exposure since the end of fiscal year 2005.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level such that the material information relating to Rollins, Inc., including our consolidated subsidiaries, and required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and was made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared.

In addition, management’s quarterly evaluation identified no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the ~~second~~third quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2006, we did not identify any material weaknesses in our internal controls, and therefore no corrective actions were taken.

Delaware	51-0068479
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Table of Contents

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page No.

	ITEM 1.	Financial Statements	3

		Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	3

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months ~~Months~~ Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005.	4

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2006 and 2005	5

		Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	6

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	7

	ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	15

	ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	2021

	ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures.	21

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION		2122

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	2122

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2122

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	2122

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	22

	Item 6.	Exhibits.	2223

Signatures			2324