UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
|
| |
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018
|
| |
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-07511
STATE STREET CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
| Massachusetts | | 04-2456637 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
One Lincoln Street Boston, Massachusetts | | 02111 |
| (Address of principal executive office) | | (Zip Code) |
617-786-3000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer x | | Accelerated filer ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | | Smaller reporting company ¨ |
Emerging growth company ¨ | | | | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2017July 20, 2018 was 370,836,680.365,827,604.
STATE STREET CORPORATION
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
SeptemberJune 30, 20172018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| | |
| PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |
| |
| Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
| |
| |
| 2017 | |
| 2017 | |
| 2017 | |
| 2017 | |
| 2017 | |
| |
| |
| PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | |
| Risk Factors | |
| Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
State Street Corporation | 2
STATE STREET CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
We use acronyms and other defined terms for certain business terms and abbreviations, as defined on the acronyms list and glossary following the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
State Street Corporation | 3
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
State Street Corporation, referred to as the Parent Company, is a financial holding company organized in 1969 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Our executive offices are located at One Lincoln Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 (telephone (617) 786-3000). For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 (Form 10-Q), unless the context requires otherwise, references to “State"State Street,” “we,” “us,” “our”" "we," "us," "our" or similar terms mean State Street Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Parent Company is a source of financial and managerial strength to our subsidiaries. Through our subsidiaries, including our principal banking subsidiary, State Street Bank, we provide a broad range of financial products and services to institutional investors worldwide, with $32.11$33.87 trillion of AUCA and $2.67$2.72 trillion of AUM as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, we had consolidated total assets of $235.99$248.31 billion, consolidated total deposits of $179.26$186.66 billion, consolidated total shareholders' equity of $22.50$22.57 billion and 36,30338,113 employees. We operate in more than 100 geographic markets worldwide, including in the U.S., Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.
Our operations are organized into two lines of business, Investment Servicing and Investment Management, which are defined based on products and services provided.
Additional information about our lines of business is provided in Line of Business Information in this Management's Discussion and Analysis and Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
This Management's Discussion and Analysis is part of our Quarterly Report onthe Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, and updates the Management's Discussion and Analysis in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC.SEC (2017 Form 10-K). You should read the financial information contained in this Management's Discussion and Analysis and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q in conjunction with the financial and other information contained in our 20162017 Form 10-K. Certain previously reported amounts presented in this Form 10-Q have been reclassified to conform to current-period presentation.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in its application of certain accounting policies that materially affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses.
The significant accounting policies that require us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that are difficult, subjective or complex about matters that
are uncertain and may change in subsequent periods include:
accounting for fair value measurements;
other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities;
impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; and
contingencies.
These significant accounting policies require the most subjective or complex judgments, and underlying estimates and assumptions could be subject to revision as new information becomes available. For additional information about these significant accounting policies refer to pages 119 - 122, "Significant115 to 118, “Significant Accounting Estimates,"Estimates” included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K. We did not change these significant accounting policies in the first ninesix months of 2017.2018.
Certain financial information provided in this Form 10-Q, including in this Management's Discussion and Analysis, is prepared on both a U.S. GAAP, or reported basis, and a non-GAAP basis, including certain non-GAAP measures used in the calculation of identified regulatory ratios. We measure and compare certain financial information on a non-GAAP basis, including information (such as capital ratios calculated under regulatory standards then scheduled to be effective in the future) that management uses in evaluating our business and activities.
Non-GAAP financial information should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or superior to, financial information prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Any non-GAAP financial information presented in this Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, is reconciled to its most directly comparable then currently applicable regulatory ratio or U.S. GAAP-basis measure.
We further believe that our presentation of fully taxable-equivalent NII, a non-GAAP measure, which reports non-taxable revenue, such as interest income associated with tax-exempt investment securities, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, facilitates an investor's understanding and analysis of our underlying financial performance and trends.
We provide additional disclosures required by applicable bank regulatory standards, including supplemental qualitative and quantitative information with respect to regulatory capital (including market
State Street Corporation | 4
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
risk associated with our trading activities) and the liquidity coverage ratio, summary results of semi-annual State Street-run stress tests which we conduct under the Dodd-Frank Act, and resolution plan disclosures required under the Dodd-Frank Act. These additional disclosures are accessible on the “Investor Relations”
State Street Corporation | 4
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
section of our corporate website at www.statestreet.com.
We have included our website address in this report as an inactive textual reference only. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-Q.
We use acronyms and other defined terms for certain business terms and abbreviations, as defined in the acronyms list and glossary following the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q, as well as other reports and proxy materials submitted by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, registration statements filed by us under the Securities Act of 1933, our annual report to shareholders and other public statements we may make, may contain statements (including statements in the Management's Discussion and Analysis included in such reports, as applicable) that are considered “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of U.S. securities laws, including statements about our goals and expectations regarding our business, financial and capital condition, results of operations, strategies, financialcost savings and transformation initiatives, investment portfolio performance, dividend and stock purchase programs, outcomes of legal proceedings, market growth, acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures, cost savings and transformation initiatives, client growth and new technologies, services and opportunities, as well as industry, governmental, regulatory, economic and market trends, initiatives and developments, the business environment and other matters that do not relate strictly to historical facts.
Terminology such as “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “objective,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “believe,” “priority,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “seek,” “may,” “will,” “trend,” “target,” “strategy” and “goal,” or similar statements or variations of such terms, are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such terms.
Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, which change over time, are based on management's expectations and assumptions at the time the statements are made, and are not guarantees of future results. Management's expectations and assumptions, and the continued validity of the forward-looking statements, are subject to change due to a broad range of factors affecting the national and global economies, regulatory environment and the equity,
debt, currency and other financial markets, as well as factors specific to State Street and its subsidiaries, including State Street Bank. Factors that could cause changes in the expectations or assumptions on which forward-looking statements are based cannot be foreseen with certainty and include, but are not limited to:
the financial strength and continuing viability of the counterparties with which we or our clients do business and to which we have investment, credit or financial exposure,exposures or to which our clients have such exposures as a result of our acting as agent, including for example, the direct and indirect effects on counterparties of the sovereign-debt risks in the U.S., Europe and other regions;as an asset manager;
increases in the volatility of, or declines in the level of, our NII, changes in the composition or valuation of the assets recorded in our consolidated statement of condition (and our ability to measure the fair value of investment securities) and the possibility that we may changechanges in the manner in which we fund those assets;
the liquidity of the U.S. and international securities markets, particularly the markets for fixed-income securities and inter-bank credits,credits; the liquidity of the assets on our balance sheet and changes or volatility in the sources of such funding, particularly the deposits of our clients; and demands upon our liquidity, including the liquidity demands and requirements of our clients;
the level and volatility of interest rates, the valuation of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies in which we record revenue or accrue expenses and the performance and volatility of securities, credit, currency and other markets in the U.S. and internationally; and the impact of monetary and fiscal policy in the United StatesU.S. and internationally on prevailing rates of interest and currency exchange rates in the markets in which we provide services to our clients;
the credit quality, credit-agency ratings and fair values of the securities in our investment securities portfolio, a deterioration or downgrade of which could lead to other-than-temporary impairment of the respectivesuch securities and the recognition of an impairment loss in our consolidated statement of income;
our ability to attract deposits and other low-cost, short-term funding,funding; our ability to manage levelsthe level and pricing of such deposits and the relative portion of our deposits that are determined to be operational under regulatory guidelinesguidelines; and our ability to deploy deposits in a profitable manner consistent with our liquidity needs, regulatory requirements and risk profile;
the manner and timing with which the Federal Reserve and other U.S. and foreign regulators implement or reevaluate changes to the regulatory framework applicable to our operations (as well as changes to that framework), including implementation or modification of the Dodd-Frank Act and related stress testing and resolution planning requirements, implementation of international standards applicable to financial institutions, such as those proposed by the Basel Committee and
State Street Corporation | 5
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
modification of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Basel III final rule and European legislation (such as the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities DirectivesAIFMD, UCITS, the Money Market Funds Regulation and Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II)MiFID II/ MiFIR); among other consequences, these regulatory changes impact the levels of regulatory capital and liquidity we must maintain, acceptable levels of credit exposure to third parties, margin requirements applicable to derivatives, and restrictions on banking and financial activities.activities and the manner in which we structure and implement our global operations and servicing relationships. In addition, our regulatory posture and related expenses have been and will continue to be affected by changes in regulatory expectations for global systemically important financial institutions applicable to, among other things, risk management, liquidity and capital planning, resolution planning, compliance programs and changes in governmental enforcement approaches to perceived failures to comply with regulatory or legal obligations;
our resolution plan, submitted to the Federal Reserve and FDIC in June 2017, may not be considered to be sufficient by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, challenges we may experience in interpreting and addressing regulatory expectations, failure to implement remediation in a timely manner, the complexities of development of a comprehensive plan to resolve a global custodial bank and related costs and dependencies. If we fail to meet regulatory expectations to the satisfaction of the Federal Reserve and the FDIC in our resolution plan submission filed in June 2017 or any future submission, we could be subject to more stringent capital, leverage or liquidity requirements, or restrictions on our growth, activities or operations;
adverse changes in the regulatory ratios that we are, required or will be, required to meet, whether arising under the Dodd-Frank Act or implementation of international standards applicable to financial institutions, such as those proposed by the Basel III final rule,Committee, or due to changes in regulatory positions, practices or regulations in jurisdictions in which we engage in banking activities, including changes in internal or external data, formulae, models, assumptions or other advanced systems used in the calculation of our capital or liquidity ratios that cause changes in those ratios as they are measured from period to period;
requirements to obtain the prior approval or non-objection of the Federal Reserve or other U.S. and non-U.S. regulators for the use, allocation or distribution of our capital or other specific capital actions or corporate activities, including,
without limitation, acquisitions, investments in subsidiaries, dividends and stock purchases, without which our growth plans, distributions to shareholders, share repurchase programs or other capital or corporate initiatives may be restricted;
changes in law or regulation, or the enforcement of law or regulation, that may adversely affect our business activities or those of our clients or our counterparties, and the products or services that we sell, including additional or increased taxes or assessments thereon, capital adequacy requirements, margin requirements and changes that expose us to risks related to the adequacy of our controls or compliance programs;
economic or financial market disruptions in the U.S. or internationally, including those which may result from recessions or political instability; for
example, the U.K.'s decision to exit from the European Union may continue to disrupt financial markets or economic growth in Europe or similarly, financial markets may react sharply or abruptly to actions takenpotential changes in trade policy and bi-lateral and multi-lateral trade agreements proposed by the new administration in the United States;U.S.;
our ability to developcreate cost efficiencies through changes in our operational processes and execute State Street Beacon, our multi-year transformation program to further digitize our business, deliver significant valueprocesses and innovation forinterfaces with our clients, and lower expenses across the organization, any failure of which, in whole or in part, may among other things, reduce our competitive position, diminish the cost-effectiveness of our systems and processes or provide an insufficient return on our associated investment;
our ability to promote a strong culture of risk management, operating controls, compliance oversight, ethical behavior and governance that meets our expectations and those of our clients and our regulators, and the financial, regulatory, reputation and other consequences of our failure to meet such expectations;
the impact on our compliance and controls enhancement programs ofassociated with the appointment of a monitor under the deferred prosecution agreement with the DOJ and compliance consultant appointed under a settlement with the SEC, including the potential for such monitor and compliance consultant to require changes to our programs or to identify other issues that require substantial expenditures, changes in our operations, or payments to clients or reporting to U.S. authorities;
the results of our review of our billing practices, including additional findings or amounts we may be required to reimburse clients, as well as
State Street Corporation | 6
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
potential consequences of such review, including damage to our client relationships or our reputation and adverse actions by governmental authorities;
the results of, and costs associated with, governmental or regulatory inquiries and investigations, litigation and similar claims, disputes, or civil or criminal proceedings;
changes or potential changes in the amount of compensation we receive from clients for our services, and the mix of services provided by us that clients choose;
the large institutional clients on which we focus are often able to exert considerable market influence and have diverse investment activities, and this, combined with strong competitive market forces, subjects us to significant pressure to reduce the fees we charge, to potentially significant changes in our assets under custody and administrationAUCA or our assets under managementAUM in the event of the acquisition or loss of a client, in whole or in part, and to potentially significant changes in our fee revenue in the event a client re-balances or
State Street Corporation | 6
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
changes its investment approach or otherwise re-directs assets to lower- or higher-fee asset classes;
the potential for losses arising from our investments in sponsored investment funds;
the possibility that our clients will incur substantial losses in investment pools for which we act as agent, and the possibility of significant reductions in the liquidity or valuation of assets underlying those pools;pools and the potential that clients will seek to hold us liable for such losses; and the possibility that our clients or regulators will assert claims that our fees with respect to such investment products are not appropriate or consistent with our fiduciary responsibilities;
our ability to anticipate and manage the level and timing of redemptions and withdrawals from our collateral pools and other collective investment products;
the credit agency ratings of our debt and depositary obligations and investor and client perceptions of our financial strength;
adverse publicity, whether specific to State Street or regarding other industry participants or industry-wide factors, or other reputational harm;
our ability to control operational risks, data security breach risks and outsourcing risks, our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, the possibility of errors in the quantitative models we use to manage our business and the possibility that our controls will prove insufficient, fail or be circumvented;
our ability to expand our use of technology to enhance the efficiency, accuracy and reliability of our operations and our dependencies on information technology and our ability to control related risks, including cyber-crime and other threats to our information technology
infrastructure and systems (including those of our third-party service providers) and their effective operation both independently and with external systems, and complexities and costs of protecting the security of such systems and data;
our ability to grow revenue, manage expenses, attract and retain highly skilled people and raise the capital necessary to achieve our business goals and comply with regulatory requirements and expectations;
changes or potential changes to the competitive environment, including changes due to regulatory and technological changes, the effects of industry consolidation and perceptions of State Street as a suitable service provider or counterparty;
our ability to complete acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures, such as our proposed acquisition of Charles River Systems, Inc. (Charles River Development), including theour ability to obtain regulatory approvals, the ability to arrange financing as required and the ability to satisfy closing conditions;
the risks that our acquired businesses and joint ventures will not achieve their anticipated financial, operational and operationalproduct innovation benefits or will not be integrated successfully, or that the integration will take longer than anticipated,anticipated; that expected synergies will not be achieved or unexpected negative synergies or liabilities will be experienced,experienced; that client and deposit retention goals will not be met,met; that other regulatory or operational challenges will be experienced,experienced; and that disruptions from the transaction will harm our relationships with our clients, our employees or regulators;
our ability to integrate Charles River Development's front office software solutions with our middle and back office capabilities to develop a front-to-middle-to-back office platform that is competitive and meets our clients' requirements;
our ability to recognize evolving needs of our clients and to develop products that are responsive to such trends and profitable to us,us; the performance of and demand for the products and services we offer,offer; and the potential for new products and services to impose additional costs on us and expose us to increased operational risk;
our ability to grow revenue, manage expenses, attract and retain highly skilled people and raise the capital necessary to achieve our business goals and comply with regulatory requirements and expectations;
changes in accounting standards and practices; and
the impact of the U.S. tax legislation enacted in 2017, and changes in tax legislation and in the interpretation of existing tax laws by U.S. and non-U.S. tax authorities that affect the amount of taxes due.
Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed in our forward- lookingforward-looking statements and from our historical financial results due to the factors discussed in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or disclosed in our other SEC filings. Forward-looking statements in
State Street Corporation | 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
this Form 10-Q should not be relied on as representing our expectations or beliefsassumptions as of any time subsequent to the time this Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC. We undertake no obligation to revise our forward-looking statements after the time they are made. The factors discussed herein are not intended to be a complete statement of all risks and uncertainties that may affect our businesses. We cannot anticipate all developments that may adversely affect our business or operations or our consolidated results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Forward-looking statements should not be viewed as predictions, and should not be the primary
State Street Corporation | 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
basis on which investors evaluate State Street. Any investor in State Street should consider all risks and uncertainties disclosed in our SEC filings, including our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, in particular our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K, or registration statements filed under the Securities Act of 1933, all of which are accessible on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or on the “Investor Relations” section of our corporate website at www.statestreet.com.
State Street Corporation | 8
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
| | | TABLE 1: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS | TABLE 1: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS | | | TABLE 1: OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL RESULTS |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Total fee revenue | $ | 2,242 |
| | $ | 2,079 |
| | 8 | % | |
| Net interest income | 603 |
| | 537 |
| | 12 |
| |
Total fee revenue(1)(2) | | $ | 2,358 |
| | $ | 2,235 |
| | 6 | % |
Net interest income(2) | | 659 |
| | 575 |
| | 15 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | nm |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | nm |
|
| Total revenue | 2,846 |
| | 2,620 |
| | 9 |
| |
Total revenue(1) | | 3,026 |
| | 2,810 |
| | 8 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 2 |
| | 3 |
| | (33 | ) |
| Total expenses | 2,021 |
| | 1,984 |
| | 2 |
| |
Total expenses(1) | | 2,159 |
| | 2,031 |
| | 6 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | 822 |
| | 636 |
| | 29 |
| 865 |
| | 776 |
| | 11 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 137 |
| | 72 |
| | 90 |
| |
| Net Income (loss) from non-controlling interest | — |
| | (1 | ) | | nm |
| |
| Income tax expense | | 131 |
| | 156 |
| | (16 | ) |
| Net income | $ | 685 |
|
| $ | 563 |
| | 22 |
| $ | 734 |
|
| $ | 620 |
| | 18 |
|
| Adjustments to net income: | | | | |
| | | | |
|
Dividends on preferred stock(1) | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) | | — |
| |
Earnings allocated to participating securities(2) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | nm |
| |
Dividends on preferred stock(3) | | $ | (36 | ) | | $ | (36 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 629 |
| | $ | 507 |
| | 24 |
| $ | 698 |
| | $ | 584 |
| | 20 |
|
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Basic | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | 29 |
| $ | 1.91 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | 22 |
|
| Diluted | 1.66 |
| | 1.29 |
| | 29 |
| 1.88 |
| | 1.53 |
| | 23 |
|
| Average common shares outstanding (in thousands): | | | | | | Average common shares outstanding (in thousands): |
| Basic | 372,765 |
| | 388,358 |
| | | 365,619 |
| | 375,395 |
| | (3 | ) |
| Diluted | 378,518 |
| | 393,212 |
| | | 370,410 |
| | 380,915 |
| | (3 | ) |
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | .42 |
| | $ | .38 |
| | | $ | .42 |
| | $ | .38 |
| | 11 |
|
| Return on average common equity | 13.0 | % | | 10.6 | % | | | 14.7 | % | | 12.6 | % | | |
| Pre-tax margin | | 28.6 |
| | 27.6 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Total fee revenue | $ | 6,675 |
| | $ | 6,102 |
| | 9 | % | |
| Net interest income | 1,688 |
| | 1,570 |
| | 8 |
| |
Total fee revenue(2) | | $ | 4,736 |
| | $ | 4,433 |
| | 7 | % |
Net interest income(2) | | 1,302 |
| | 1,085 |
| | 20 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| | nm |
| 7 |
| | (40 | ) | | 118 |
|
| Total revenue | 8,324 |
| | 7,677 |
| | 8 |
| 6,045 |
| | 5,478 |
| | 10 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 4 |
| | 8 |
| | (50 | ) | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 100 |
|
| Total expenses | 6,138 |
| | 5,894 |
| | 4 |
| 4,415 |
| | 4,117 |
| | 7 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | 2,182 |
| | 1,775 |
|
| 23 |
| 1,628 |
| | 1,360 |
| | 20 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 375 |
| | 226 |
| | 66 |
| |
| Net income from non-controlling interest | — |
| | 1 |
| | nm |
| |
| Income tax expense | | 233 |
| | 238 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Net income | $ | 1,807 |
| | $ | 1,550 |
| | 17 |
| $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
| | 24 |
|
| Adjustments to net income: | | | | | | | | | |
|
Dividends on preferred stock(1) | $ | (146 | ) | | $ | (137 | ) | | 7 |
| |
Earnings allocated to participating securities(2) | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | | nm |
| |
Dividends on preferred stock(3) | | $ | (91 | ) | | $ | (91 | ) | | — |
|
Earnings allocated to participating securities(4) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 1,659 |
| | $ | 1,411 |
| | 18 |
| $ | 1,303 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
| | 27 |
|
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Basic | $ | 4.41 |
| | $ | 3.58 |
| | 23 |
| $ | 3.55 |
| | $ | 2.72 |
| | 31 |
|
| Diluted | 4.35 |
| | 3.54 |
| | 23 |
| 3.51 |
| | 2.69 |
| | 30 |
|
| Average common shares outstanding (in thousands): | | | | | | Average common shares outstanding (in thousands): |
| Basic | 376,430 |
| | 393,959 | | | 366,524 |
| | 378,293 |
| | (3 | ) |
| Diluted | 381,779 |
| | 398,413 | | | 371,415 |
| | 383,489 |
| | (3 | ) |
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | | $ | .84 |
| | $ | .76 |
| | 11 |
|
| Return on average common equity | 11.9 | % | | 9.9 | % | | | 13.7 | % | | 11.3 | % | | |
| Pre-tax Margin | | 26.9 |
| | 24.8 |
| | |
(1) The impact of adopting the new revenue recognition standard in 2018 was an increase in both total revenue and total expenses of approximately $70 million in the second quarter of 2018. Relative to the second quarter of 2017, the new revenue recognition standard contributed approximately 3% to both total revenue and total expense growth. Revenues increased approximately $45 million in management fees, $20 million in trading services and $5 million across other revenue lines, and expenses increased approximately $45 million in other expenses, $15 million in transaction processing and $10 million in information systems and communication as a result of the adoption of this new accounting standard.
(2) Approximately $15 million of swap costs in 1Q18 were reclassified from processing fees and other revenue within fee revenue to net interest income to conform to current presentation. No other prior periods were revised.
(3) Additional information about our preferred stock dividends is provided in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
(2)(4) Represents the portion of net income available to common equity allocated to participating securities, composed of unvested and fully vested SERP shares and fully vested deferred director stock awards, which are equity-based awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and are considered to participate with the common stock in undistributed earnings.
nm Not meaningful
State Street Corporation | 89
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following “Financial Results and Highlights” section provides information related to significant events, as well as highlights of our consolidated financial results for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 presented in Table 1: Overview of Financial Results. More detailed information about our consolidated financial results, including comparisons of our financial results for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 to those for the same periods in 2016,2017, is provided under “Consolidated Results of Operations,” "Line of Business Information" and "Capital" which follows these sections, as well as in our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. In this Management’s Discussion and Analysis, where we describe the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates, those effects are determined by applying applicable weighted average foreign exchange rates from the relevant 20162017 period to the relevant 20172018 period results.
Financial Results and Highlights
EPS of $1.66$1.88 in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172018 increased 29%23% compared to $1.29$1.53 in the thirdsecond quarter of 2016.
2017.ThirdSecond quarter 2017of 2018 ROE of 13.0%14.7% and pre-tax margin of 28.6% increased from 10.6% in the third quarter of 2016.
Pre-tax margin of 28.9% in the third quarter of 2017 increased from 24.3% in the third quarter of 2016.
Revenue
Total revenue12.6% and fee revenue increased 9% and 8%27.6%, respectively, in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172017.
Operating leverage was 1.4% for the second quarter of 2018. Operating leverage represents the difference in the percentage change in total revenue less the percentage change in total expenses, in each case relative to the prior year period.
Fee operating leverage was (0.8)% for the second quarter of 2018. Fee operating leverage represents the difference in the percentage change in total fee revenue less the percentage change in total expenses, in each case relative to the prior year period. The negative fee operating leverage was primarily due to lower securities finance revenue in the second quarter of 2018 as compared to the thirdsecond quarter of 2016, primarily driven by higher global equity markets, net new asset servicing business and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by lower trading services revenue.2017.
Revenue
| |
| • | Total revenue(1) and fee revenue(1) increased 8% and 6%, respectively, in the second quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, respectively, primarily driven by higher management fees and servicing fees and, in the case of total revenue, higher NII. |
Servicing fee revenue increased 4%3% in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172018 compared to the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, primarily due to higher global equity markets, netincreased client activity, new business and the weaker U.S. dollar.favorable impact of currency translation, partially offset by continued modest hedge fund outflows.
| |
| • | Management fee revenue increased 17% in the second quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to the adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting standard in 2018(1) and higher global equity markets. |
NII increased 14%15% in the thirdsecond quarter of 20172018 compared to the thirdsecond quarter of 2016, primarily due to higher global equity markets, new business and higher revenue-yielding ETF inflows.
NII increased 12% in the third quarter of 2017, compared to the third quarter of 2016, primarily due to higher U.S. market interest rates loan portfolio growth, lower wholesale CD costs and disciplined liability pricing, partially offset by lower average interest earning assets.
Expenses
Total expenses increased 2%a shift in the third quartercomposition of 2017 compared to the third quarterour investment portfolio. In 2018, we sold approximately $16 billion of 2016,non-HQLA assets, out of which $11 billion was reinvested primarily reflecting installationin HQLA assets.
Expenses
| |
| • | Total expenses(1) increased 6% in the second quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, primarily due to the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018, investments to support new business and higher salaries and benefits, partially offset by Beacon savings and lower performance-based incentive compensation. |
| |
| ◦ | In the first six months of 2018, we have achieved approximately $120 million of Beacon pre-tax year-over-year savings net of Beacon investments, and expect total pre-tax year-over-year savings of $200 million in 2018. |
| |
| ◦ | The second quarter of 2018 included a $77 million repositioning charge related to organizational changes and management streamlining, consisting of $61 million of compensation and employee benefits and $16 million of occupancy costs. The second quarter of 2017 included acquisition and restructuring charges of $71 million, primarily related to Beacon. |
State Street Corporation | 10
In the third quarter of 2017, we recorded restructuring charges of $33 million related to Beacon.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
AUCA/AUM
AUCA increased 10%9% in the thirdsecond quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, compared to the third quarter of 2016, primarily due to higher globalstrength in equity markets, new business and business activity. In the third quarter of 2017, we secured new asset servicing mandates of approximately $105 billion. Our AUCA pipeline of asset servicing mandates that have been won but not yet installed as of September 30, 2017 totaled approximately $390 billion.
AUM increased 9% in the third quarter of 2017 compared to the third quarter of 2016, primarily due to higher global equity markets and positive ETFclient flows, partially offset by continuingclient transitions. Newly announced asset servicing mandates totaled approximately $1.5 trillion year-to-date, of which $105 billion was newly announced in the second quarter of 2018. Servicing assets remaining to be installed in future periods totaled approximately $300 billion as of June 30, 2018.
AUM increased 5% in the second quarter of 2018 compared to the second quarter of 2017, primarily driven by strength in equity markets, partially offset by lower yielding institutional outflows. We experienced net outflows.outflows of approximately $14 billion during the second quarter of 2018.
Capital
We declared a quarterlyaggregate common stock dividenddividends of $0.42 per share, totaling approximately $156$153 million in the thirdsecond quarter of 2017,2018, compared to $0.38 per share, totaling $147$142 million in the thirdsecond quarter of 2016,2017, representing an increase of approximately 11% on a per share basis.
| |
| ◦ | On July 19, 2018, we declared a common stock dividend for the third quarter of 2018 in the amount of $0.47 per share, representing an increase of 12% from the common stock dividend of $0.42 per share declared in the second quarter of 2018. |
In the third quarter of 2017,six months ended June 30, 2018, we acquired approximately 3.73.3 million shares of common stock at an average per-share cost of $93.39$105.31 and an aggregate cost of approximately $350 million under the common stock purchase program approved by our Board in June 2017.2017 (the 2017 Program). In June 2018, the Federal Reserve issued a conditional non-objection to our capital plan submitted as part of the 2018 CCAR submission; and in connection with such capital plan our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $1.2 billion of our common stock through June 30, 2019 (the 2018 Program). In connection with our proposed acquisition of Charles River Development, we did not purchase any common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 under the 2017 Program and we do not intend to purchase any common stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2018 under the 2018 Program. We intend to resume our common stock purchases in the
first quarter of 2019 and may repurchase up to $600 million through June 30, 2019.
CET1 capital ratio under the Basel III standardized approach was 11.6%decreased to 11.3% as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018 compared to 11.9% as of December 31, 2017 primarily due to an increase in the FX derivative portfolio and overdrafts as of June 30, 2018.
Tier 1 leverage ratio increaseddecreased to 7.4%7.1% as of SeptemberJune 30, 2018, compared to 7.3% as of December 31, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in client deposits.
Recent Developments
On July 20, 2018, we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Charles River Development, a provider of investment management front office tools and solutions. Under the terms of the agreement, we will purchase Charles River Development in an all cash transaction for $2.6 billion. The acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018. The $2.6 billion purchase price is expected to be financed through the suspension of approximately $950 million of share repurchases in the second quarter of 2018 and during the remainder of 2018, and, subject to market conditions, the remainder of the purchase price through the issuance of equity, with approximately two-thirds of such equity expected to be in the form of common stock and one-third in preferred stock.
|
| | | | |
(1) The impact of adopting the new revenue recognition standard in 2018 was an increase in both total revenue and total expenses of approximately $70 million in the second quarter of 2018. Relative to the second quarter of 2017, the new revenue recognition standard contributed approximately 3% to both total revenue and total expense growth. Revenues increased approximately $45 million in management fees, $20 million in trading services and $5 million across other revenue lines, and expenses increased approximately $45 million in other expenses, $15 million in transaction processing and $10 million in information systems and communication as a result of the adoption of this new accounting standard. |
State Street Corporation | 911
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section discusses our consolidated results of operations for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 compared to the same periods in 2016,2017, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying condensed notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Total Revenue
| | | TABLE 2: TOTAL REVENUE | TABLE 2: TOTAL REVENUE | TABLE 2: TOTAL REVENUE | |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Fee revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Servicing fees | $ | 1,351 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| | 4 | % | $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | 1,339 |
| | 3 | % |
| Management fees | 419 |
| | 368 |
| | 14 |
| 465 |
| | 397 |
| | 17 |
|
| Trading services: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange trading | 150 |
| | 159 |
| | (6 | ) | 194 |
| | 178 |
| | 9 |
|
| Brokerage and other trading services | 109 |
| | 108 |
| | 1 |
| 121 |
| | 111 |
| | 9 |
|
| Total trading services | 259 |
| | 267 |
| | (3 | ) | 315 |
| | 289 |
| | 9 |
|
| Securities finance | 147 |
| | 136 |
| | 8 |
| 154 |
| | 179 |
| | (14 | ) |
| Processing fees and other | 66 |
| | 5 |
| | nm |
| 43 |
| | 31 |
| | 39 |
|
| Total fee revenue | 2,242 |
| | 2,079 |
| | 8 |
| 2,358 |
| | 2,235 |
| | 6 |
|
| Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | 761 |
| | 647 |
| | 18 |
| 907 |
| | 700 |
| | 30 |
|
| Interest expense | 158 |
| | 110 |
| | 44 |
| 248 |
| | 125 |
| | 98 |
|
| Net interest income | 603 |
| | 537 |
| | 12 |
| 659 |
| | 575 |
| | 15 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | nm |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | nm |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 2,846 |
| | $ | 2,620 |
| | 9 |
| $ | 3,026 |
| | $ | 2,810 |
| | 8 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Fee revenue: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Servicing fees | $ | 3,986 |
| | $ | 3,784 |
| | 5 | % | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 2,635 |
| | 6 | % |
| Management fees | 1,198 |
| | 931 |
| | 29 |
| 937 |
| | 779 |
| | 20 |
|
| Trading services: | | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
|
| Foreign exchange trading | 492 |
| | 472 |
| | 4 |
| 375 |
| | 342 |
| | 10 |
|
| Brokerage and other trading services | 331 |
| | 334 |
| | (1 | ) | 244 |
| | 222 |
| | 10 |
|
| Total trading services | 823 |
| | 806 |
| | 2 |
| 619 |
| | 564 |
| | 10 |
|
| Securities finance | 459 |
| | 426 |
| | 8 |
| 295 |
| | 312 |
| | (5 | ) |
| Processing fees and other | 209 |
| | 155 |
| | 35 |
| 83 |
| | 143 |
| | (42 | ) |
| Total fee revenue | 6,675 |
| | 6,102 |
| | 9 |
| 4,736 |
| | 4,433 |
| | 7 |
|
| Net interest income: | Net interest income: | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
|
| Interest income | 2,111 |
| | 1,896 |
| | 11 |
| 1,764 |
| | 1,350 |
| | 31 |
|
| Interest expense | 423 |
| | 326 |
| | 30 |
| 462 |
| | 265 |
| | 74 |
|
| Net interest income | 1,688 |
| | 1,570 |
| | 8 |
| 1,302 |
| | 1,085 |
| | 20 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| | nm |
| 7 |
| | (40 | ) | | 118 |
|
| Total revenue | $ | 8,324 |
| | $ | 7,677 |
| | 8 |
| $ | 6,045 |
| | $ | 5,478 |
| | 10 |
|
nmNot meaningful
Fee Revenue
Table 2: Total Revenue, provides the breakout of fee revenue for the quartersthree and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016.2018 compared to the same periods in 2017.
Servicing and management fees collectively made up approximately 79%78% and 78%79% of total fee revenue in the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to approximately 80%78% and 77% in the third quarter and first nine monthssame periods of 2016,2017, respectively. The level of these fees is influenced by several factors, including the mix and volume of our AUCA and our AUM, the value and type of securities positions held (with respect to assets under custody), the volume of portfolio transactions and the types of products and services used by our clients, and is generally affected by changes in worldwide equity and fixed-income security valuations and trends in market asset class preferences.
Generally, servicing fees are affected by changes in daily average valuations of AUCA. Additional factors, such as the relative mix of assets serviced, the level of transaction volumes, changes in service level, the nature of services provided, balance credits, client minimum balances, pricing concessions, the geographical location in which services are provided and other factors, may have a significant effect on our servicing fee revenue.
Management fees generally are affected by changes in month-end valuations of AUM. Management fees for certain components of managed assets, such as ETFs, are affected by daily average valuations of AUM. Management fee revenue is more sensitive to market valuations than servicing fee revenue, as a higher proportion of the underlying services provided, and the associated management fees earned, are dependent on equity and fixed-income security valuations. Additional factors, such as the relative mix of assets managed, may have a significant effect on our management fee revenue. While certain management fees are directly determined by the values of AUM and the investment strategies employed, management fees may reflect other factors, as well, including performance fee arrangements, as well as our relationship pricing for clients using multiple services.
Asset-based management fees for actively managed products are generally charged at a higher percentage of AUM than for passive products. Actively managed products may also include performance fee arrangements which are recorded when the performance periodfee is complete.earned, based on predetermined benchmarks associated with the applicable fund’s performance.
State Street Corporation | 1012
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In light of the above, we estimate, using relevant information as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and assuming that all other factors remain constant, that:
A 10% increase or decrease in worldwide equity valuations, on a weighted average basis, over the relevant periods for which our servicing and management fees are calculated, would result in a corresponding change in our total servicing and management fee revenues of approximately 3%; and
A 10% increase or decrease in worldwide fixed income markets,valuations, on a weighted average basis, over the relevant periods for which our servicing and management fees are calculated, would result in a corresponding change in our total servicing and management fee revenues of approximately 1%.
See Table 3: Daily, Month-End and Quarter-End Equity Indices and Table 4: Quarter-End Debt Indices, for selected indices. While the specific indices presented are indicative of general market trends, the asset types and classes relevant to individual client portfolios can and do differ, and the performance of associated relevant indices can therefore differ from the performance of the indices presented.
Daily averages, month-end averages and quarter-end indices demonstrate worldwide changes in equity and debt markets that affect our servicing and management fee revenue. Quarter-end indices affect the values of AUCA and AUM as of those dates.
Further discussion of fee revenue is provided under Line of Business Information in this Management's Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.
| | TABLE 3: DAILY, MONTH-END AND QUARTER-END EQUITY INDICES(1) | TABLE 3: DAILY, MONTH-END AND QUARTER-END EQUITY INDICES(1) | TABLE 3: DAILY, MONTH-END AND QUARTER-END EQUITY INDICES(1) |
| | Daily Averages of Indices | | Averages of Month-End Indices | | Quarter-End Indices | Daily Averages of Indices | | Averages of Month-End Indices | | Quarter-End Indices |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | Quarters Ended September 30, | | As of September 30, | Quarters Ended June 30, | | Quarters Ended June 30, | | As of June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
S&P 500® | 2,467 |
| | 2,162 |
| | 14 | % | | 2,487 |
| | 2,171 |
| | 15 | % | | 2,519 |
| | 2,168 |
| | 16 | % | 2,703 |
| | 2,398 |
| | 13 | % | | 2,691 |
| | 2,406 |
| | 12 | % | | 2,718 |
| | 2,423 |
| | 12 | % |
MSCI EAFE® | 1,934 |
| | 1,678 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,947 |
| | 1,692 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,974 |
| | 1,702 |
| | 16 |
| 2,018 |
| | 1,856 |
| | 9 |
| | 1,996 |
| | 1,869 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,959 |
| | 1,883 |
| | 4 |
|
MSCI® Emerging Markets | 1,068 |
| | 887 |
| | 20 |
| | 1,079 |
| | 890 |
| | 21 |
| | 1,082 |
| | 903 |
| | 20 |
| 1,138 |
| | 993 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,118 |
| | 998 |
| | 12 |
| | 1,070 |
| | 1,011 |
| | 6 |
|
HFRI Asset Weighted Composite® | NA |
| | NA |
| | NA |
| | 1,358 |
| | 1,274 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,361 |
| | 1,277 |
| | 7 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | NA |
| | 1,407 |
| | 1,339 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,409 |
| | 1,336 |
| | 5 |
|
| | | | Daily Averages of Indices | | Averages of Month-End Indices | Daily Averages of Indices | | Averages of Month-End Indices |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
S&P 500® | 2,397 |
| | 2,065 |
| | 16 | % | | 2,410 |
| | 2,078 |
| | 16 | % | 2,718 |
| | 2,362 |
| | 15 | % | | 2,708 |
| | 2,371 |
| | 14 | % |
MSCI EAFE® | 1,846 |
| | 1,640 |
| | 13 |
| | 1,859 |
| | 1,650 |
| | 13 |
| 2,045 |
| | 1,802 |
| | 13 |
| | 2,033 |
| | 1,814 |
| | 12 |
|
MSCI® Emerging Markets | 996 |
| | 821 |
| | 21 |
| | 1,004 |
| | 830 |
| | 21 |
| 1,171 |
| | 960 |
| | 22 |
| | 1,163 |
| | 966 |
| | 20 |
|
HFRI Asset Weighted Composite® | NA |
| | NA |
| | NA |
| | 1,340 |
| | 1,255 |
| | 7 |
| NA |
| | NA |
| | NA |
| | 1,408 |
| | 1,331 |
| | 6 |
|
(1) The index names listed in the table are service marks of their respective owners.
NA Not applicable
| | TABLE 4: QUARTER-END DEBT INDICES(1) | TABLE 4: QUARTER-END DEBT INDICES(1) | TABLE 4: QUARTER-END DEBT INDICES(1) |
| | Quarter-End Indices | As of June 30, |
| | As of September 30, | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | |
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index® | 2,038 |
| | 2,037 |
| | — | % | 2,013 |
| | 2,021 |
| | — | % |
Barclays Capital Global Aggregate Bond Index® | 480 |
| | 486 |
| | nm |
| 478 |
| | 471 |
| | 1 |
|
(1) The index names listed in the table are service marks of their respective owners.
State Street Corporation | 1113
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
See Table 2: Total Revenue, for the breakout of interest income and interest expense for the quartersthree and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 compared to the same periods in 2017. NII was $659 million and $1,302 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $575 million and $1,085 million for the same periods in 2017, and 2016.respectively.
NII is defined as interest income earned on interest-earning assets less interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-earning assets, which principally consist of investment securities, interest-bearing deposits with banks, repurchase resale
agreements, loans and leases and other liquid assets, are financed primarily by client deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term debt.
NIM represents the relationship between annualized fully taxable-equivalent NII and average total interest-earning assets for the period. It is calculated by dividing fully taxable-equivalent NII by average interest-earning assets. Revenue that is exempt from income taxes, mainly that earned from certain investment securities (state and political subdivisions), is adjusted to a fully taxable-equivalent basis using athe U.S. federal and state statutory income tax rate of 35%, adjusted for applicable state income taxes, net of the related federal tax benefit.rates.
State Street Corporation | 1214
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | TABLE 5: AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES - FULLY TAXABLE-EQUIVALENT BASIS | | | Quarters Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Dollars in millions; fully taxable-equivalent basis) | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate |
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | $ | 45,513 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | .40 | % | | $ | 57,580 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | .20 | % | $ | 55,180 |
| | $ | 90 |
| | .66 | % | | $ | 53,146 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | .31 | % |
Securities purchased under resale agreements(1)(2) | 2,167 |
| | 74 |
| | 13.53 |
| | 2,667 |
| | 40 |
| | 6.01 |
| 2,474 |
| | 81 |
| | 13.20 |
| | 2,352 |
| | 69 |
| | 11.77 |
|
| Trading account assets | 991 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 994 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 1,139 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 941 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Investment securities | 95,311 |
| | 474 |
| | 1.99 |
| | 100,449 |
| | 505 |
| | 2.01 |
| 86,360 |
| | 479 |
| | 2.21 |
| | 94,637 |
| | 466 |
| | 1.97 |
|
| Loans and leases | 22,843 |
| | 143 |
| | 2.49 |
| | 18,744 |
| | 97 |
| | 2.06 |
| 23,622 |
| | 172 |
| | 2.93 |
| | 21,070 |
| | 122 |
| | 2.31 |
|
| Other interest-earning assets | 23,091 |
| | 67 |
| | 1.18 |
| | 21,721 |
| | 18 |
| | .30 |
| 17,397 |
| | 103 |
| | 2.36 |
| | 23,141 |
| | 44 |
| | .76 |
|
| Average total interest-earning assets | $ | 189,916 |
| | $ | 803 |
| | 1.68 |
| | $ | 202,155 |
| | $ | 689 |
| | 1.35 |
| $ | 186,172 |
| | $ | 925 |
| | 1.99 |
| | $ | 195,287 |
| | $ | 742 |
| | 1.52 |
|
| Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 25,767 |
| | $ | 21 |
| | .32 | % | | $ | 33,668 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | .49 | % | $ | 50,276 |
| | $ | 46 |
| | .37 | % | | $ | 25,770 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | .38 | % |
Non-U.S.(2) | 96,189 |
| | 18 |
| | .07 |
| | 95,617 |
| | (22 | ) | | (.09 | ) | |
Securities sold under repurchase agreements(3) | 3,974 |
| | 1 |
| | .07 |
| | 3,976 |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
Non-U.S.(3) | | 76,307 |
| | 43 |
| | .23 |
| | 99,389 |
| | (10 | ) | | (.04 | ) |
Total interest-bearing deposits(3) | | 126,583 |
| | 89 |
| | .28 |
| | 125,159 |
| | 14 |
| | .05 |
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements(4) | | 2,641 |
| | 6 |
| | .92 |
| | 4,028 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Federal funds purchased | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 24 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | 1,277 |
| | 3 |
| | .81 |
| | 1,566 |
| | 2 |
| | .57 |
| 1,320 |
| | 4 |
| | 1.25 |
| | 1,322 |
| | 3 |
| | .80 |
|
| Long-term debt | 11,766 |
| | 78 |
| | 2.67 |
| | 11,885 |
| | 68 |
| | 2.27 |
| 10,649 |
| | 97 |
| | 3.66 |
| | 11,515 |
| | 75 |
| | 2.61 |
|
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 4,063 |
| | 37 |
| | 3.70 |
| | 5,647 |
| | 20 |
| | 1.41 |
| 4,994 |
| | 52 |
| | 4.17 |
| | 5,355 |
| | 33 |
| | 2.44 |
|
| Average total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 143,036 |
| | $ | 158 |
| | .44 |
| | $ | 152,383 |
| | $ | 110 |
| | .29 |
| $ | 146,187 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | .68 |
| | $ | 147,381 |
| | $ | 125 |
| | .34 |
|
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | 1.24 | % | | | | | | 1.06 | % | | | | | 1.31 | % | | | | | | 1.18 | % |
| Net interest income—fully taxable-equivalent basis | | | $ | 645 |
| | | | | | $ | 579 |
| | | | | $ | 677 |
| | | | | | $ | 617 |
| | |
| Net interest margin—fully taxable-equivalent basis | | | | | 1.35 | % | | | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | | 1.46 | % | | | | | | 1.27 | % |
| Tax-equivalent adjustment | | | (42 | ) | | | | | | (42 | ) | | | | | (18 | ) | | | | | | (42 | ) | | |
| Net interest income—GAAP basis | | | $ | 603 |
| | | | | | $ | 537 |
| | | | | $ | 659 |
| | | | | | $ | 575 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (Dollars in millions; fully taxable-equivalent basis) | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate | | Average Balance | | Interest Revenue/ Expense | | Rate |
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | $ | 49,171 |
| | $ | 121 |
| | .33 | % | | $ | 52,423 |
| | $ | 101 |
| | .26 | % | $ | 53,346 |
| | $ | 172 |
| | .65 | % | | $ | 51,031 |
| | $ | 76 |
| | .30 | % |
Securities purchased under resale agreements(1)
| 2,192 |
| | 189 |
| | 11.52 |
| | 2,610 |
| | 112 |
| | 5.73 |
| |
Securities purchased under resale agreements(2)
| | 2,672 |
| | 159 |
| | 11.97 |
| | 2,205 |
| | 115 |
| | 10.52 |
|
| Trading account assets | 949 |
| | (1 | ) | | (.14 | ) | | 908 |
| | 1 |
| | .09 |
| 1,138 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 928 |
| | (1 | ) | | (.13 | ) |
| Investment securities | 95,716 |
| | 1,410 |
| | 1.96 |
| | 101,243 |
| | 1,486 |
| | 1.96 |
| 90,836 |
| | 960 |
| | 2.12 |
| | 95,921 |
| | 936 |
| | 1.95 |
|
| Loans and leases | 21,360 |
| | 373 |
| | 2.33 |
| | 18,674 |
| | 281 |
| | 2.01 |
| 23,790 |
| | 331 |
| | 2.80 |
| | 20,607 |
| | 230 |
| | 2.25 |
|
| Other interest-earning assets | 22,952 |
| | 146 |
| | .85 |
| | 22,316 |
| | 39 |
| | .24 |
| 17,564 |
| | 180 |
| | 2.07 |
| | 22,882 |
| | 78 |
| | .69 |
|
| Average total interest-earning assets | $ | 192,340 |
| | $ | 2,238 |
| | 1.56 |
| | $ | 198,174 |
| | $ | 2,020 |
| | 1.36 |
| $ | 189,346 |
| | $ | 1,802 |
| | 1.92 |
| | $ | 193,574 |
| | $ | 1,434 |
| | 1.49 |
|
| Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 25,821 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | .40 | % | | $ | 30,388 |
| | $ | 99 |
| | .44 | % | $ | 49,461 |
| | $ | 80 |
| | .33 | % | | $ | 25,849 |
| | $ | 56 |
| | .44 | % |
Non-U.S.(2) | 96,860 |
| | 19 |
| | .03 |
| | 95,013 |
| | (26 | ) | | (.04 | ) | |
Non-U.S.(3) | | 77,438 |
| | 72 |
| | .19 |
| | 97,201 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
Total interest-bearing deposits(3) | | 126,899 |
| | 152 |
| | .24 |
| | 123,050 |
| | 57 |
| | .09 |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 3,965 |
| | 2 |
| | .05 |
| | 4,107 |
| | 1 |
| | .03 |
| 2,629 |
| | 7 |
| | .54 |
| | 3,961 |
| | 1 |
| | .04 |
|
| Federal funds purchased | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | — |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | 1,313 |
| | 7 |
| | .75 |
| | 1,727 |
| | 4 |
| | .34 |
| 1,287 |
| | 7 |
| | 1.17 |
| | 1,332 |
| | 5 |
| | .71 |
|
| Long-term debt | 11,569 |
| | 227 |
| | 2.61 |
| | 11,306 |
| | 191 |
| | 2.24 |
| 11,029 |
| | 194 |
| | 3.51 |
| | 11,469 |
| | 148 |
| | 2.58 |
|
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 4,881 |
| | 91 |
| | 2.50 |
| | 5,550 |
| | 57 |
| | 1.38 |
| 5,126 |
| | 102 |
| | 4.02 |
| | 5,298 |
| | 54 |
| | 2.04 |
|
| Average total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 144,410 |
| | $ | 423 |
| | .39 |
| | $ | 148,124 |
| | $ | 326 |
| | .29 |
| $ | 146,970 |
| | $ | 462 |
| | .63 |
| | $ | 145,111 |
| | $ | 265 |
| | .37 |
|
| Interest-rate spread | | | | | 1.17 | % | | | | | | 1.07 | % | | | | | 1.29 | % | | | | | | 1.12 | % |
| Net interest income—fully taxable-equivalent basis | | | $ | 1,815 |
| | | | | | $ | 1,694 |
| | | | | $ | 1,340 |
| | | | | | $ | 1,169 |
| | |
| Net interest margin—fully taxable-equivalent basis | | | | | 1.26 | % | | | | | | 1.14 | % | | | | | 1.43 | % | | | | | | 1.22 | % |
| Tax-equivalent adjustment | | | (127 | ) | | | | | | (124 | ) | | | | | (38 | ) | | | | | | (84 | ) | | |
| Net interest income—GAAP basis | | | $ | 1,688 |
| | | | | | $ | 1,570 |
| | | | | $ | 1,302 |
| | | | | | $ | 1,085 |
| | |
(1) Rates earned/paid on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities include the impact of hedge activities associated with our asset and liability management activities where applicable.
(2)Reflects the impact of balance sheet netting under enforceable netting agreements of approximately $30 billion and $31 billion for the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, and $30 billion and $32 billion for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2016,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $33 billion and $32 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively. Excluding the impact of netting, the average interest rates would be approximately 0.92%0.98% and 0.76%0.93% for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and 0.49%approximately 0.79% and 0.44%0.67% for the third quarter and first nine months of 2016,same periods in 2017, respectively.
(2)(3) Average rate includes the impact of FX swap expensecosts of approximately $39$42 million and $84$76 million for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $3$13 million and $24$45 million for the same periods in 2016,2017, respectively. The first six months of 2018 includes approximately $15 million of swap costs related to the first quarter of 2018 that were reclassified from Processing fees and other revenues to NII. Average rates for total interest-bearing deposits excluding the impact of FX swap costs were 0.15% and 0.12% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and 0.00% and 0.02% for the same periods in 2017, respectively.
(3)(4) Interest for the thirdsecond quarter of 20162017 was less than $1 million, representing an average interest rate of 0.02%0.04%.
State Street Corporation | 1315
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
See Table 5: Average Balances and Interest Rates - Fully Taxable-Equivalent Basis, for the breakout of NII on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis for the quartersthree and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017. NII on a fully taxable-equivalentFTE basis increased in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periodperiods in 2016, as benefits2017, primarily due to higher U.S. market interest rates loan portfolio growth and disciplined liability pricing, were partially offset by lower average interest earning assets and a smaller amount of discount accretion related to the asset-backed commercial paper conduits. Average balancesshift in the third quartercomposition of 2017 reflect management actions to reduce the usage of wholesale deposit funding on our balance sheet. Average deposits were approximately $12.06 billion lower in the third quarter of 2017 compared to the third quarter of 2016, primarily due to a $14.91 billion reduction in wholesale deposit funding and were partially offset by an increase in less expensive client deposits.investment portfolio.
We recorded aggregate discount accretion in interest income of approximately $4 million and $15$8 million for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months ofended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to approximately $6 million and $10 million for the same periods in 2017, respectively, related to the assets we consolidated onto our balance sheet in 2009 from our asset-backed commercial paper conduits. Assuming that we hold the former conduit securities remaining in our investment portfolio until they mature or are sold, we expect to generate aggregate discount accretion in future periods of approximately $126$103 million over their remaining terms.
The timing and ultimate recognition of any applicable discount accretion depends, in part, on factors that are outside of our control, including anticipated prepayment speeds and credit quality. The impact of these factors is uncertain and can be significantly influenced by general economic and financial market conditions. The timing and recognition of any applicable discount accretion can also be influenced by our ongoing management of the risks and other characteristics associated with our investment securities portfolio, including sales of securities which would otherwise generate interest revenue through accretion.
Changes in the components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are discussed in more detail below. Additional information about the components of interest income and interest expense is provided in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Average total interest-earning assets were $5.83$186.17 billion lowerand $189.35 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $195.29 billion and $193.57 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively. The decrease for both periods is largely driven by sales of investment securities of approximately $16 billion in the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a smaller investment portfolio.2018.
Interest-bearing deposits with banks averaged $45.51$55.18 billion and $49.17$53.35 billion for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $57.58$53.15 billion and $52.42$51.03 billion for the same periods in 2016.2017, respectively. These deposits primarily reflect our maintenance of cash balances at the Federal Reserve, the ECB and other non-U.S. central banks.
Investment securities
Securities purchased under resale agreements averaged $95.31$2.47 billion and $95.72$2.67 billion for the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $100.45$2.35 billion and $101.24$2.21 billion for the same periods in 2016.2017, respectively. This reflects the impact of balance sheet netting under enforceable netting agreements of approximately $31 billion and $32 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and approximately $33 billion and $32 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively. We maintain an agreement with a clearing organization that enables us to net all securities sold under repurchase agreements against those purchased under resale agreements with counterparties that are also members of the clearing organization.
Investment securities averaged $86.36 billion and $90.84 billion in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $94.64 billion and $95.92 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively. The decrease in average investment securities resulted from a reductionfor both periods was primarily driven by our investment repositioning strategy to prioritize capital efficient client lending while managing OCI sensitivity. We sold approximately $4 billion and $16 billion of our U.S. Treasury
non-HQLA securities in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, primarily asset-backed securities and our continued investmentmunicipal bonds. $11 billion of sale proceeds were reinvested back into loans and lease products.the securities portfolio focused mostly on HQLA assets. Additional portfolio reinvestment of the securities sales will occur over time with a portion likely to either be held in cash or cash equivalents or used to fund client lending activities.
Loans and leases averaged $22.84$23.62 billion and $21.36$23.79 billion forin the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $18.74$21.07 billion and $18.67$20.61 billion for the same periods in 2016.2017, respectively. The increase in average loans and leases resulted from growth in loans to municipalities,was primarily driven by higher levels of mutual fund lending, overdrafts and continued investment in senior secured bank loans.
|
| | | | | | | |
| TABLE 6: U.S. AND NON-U.S. SHORT-DURATION ADVANCES |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Average U.S. short-duration advances | $ | 2,233 |
| | $ | 2,114 |
|
| Average non-U.S. short-duration advances | 1,566 |
| | 1,299 |
|
| Average total short-duration advances | $ | 3,799 |
| | $ | 3,413 |
|
| Average short-duration advances to average loans and leases | 17 | % | | 18 | % |
| | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Average U.S. short-duration advances | $ | 2,193 |
| | $ | 2,163 |
|
| Average non-U.S. short-duration advances | 1,414 |
| | 1,345 |
|
| Average total short-duration advances | $ | 3,607 |
| | $ | 3,508 |
|
| Average short-duration advances to average loans and leases | 17 | % | | 19 | % |
Average loans Loans and leases also includes short-duration advances. The decline in the proportion of average short-duration advances to average loansU.S. and leases is primarily due to growth in the other segments of the loan and lease portfolio. Short-duration advancesnon-U.S. overdrafts, which provide liquidity to clients in support of their investment activities.
Average other interest-earning assets increased to $23.09 billion and $22.95 billion for the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, from $21.72 billion and $22.32 billion for the same periods in 2016. Our average other interest-earning assets, largely associated with our enhanced custody business, comprised approximately 12%decreased to $17.40 billion and $17.56 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, from $23.14 billion and $22.88 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively, largely driven by a reduction in the level of cash collateral posted by our average total interest-earning assets for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, compared to approximately 11% for both the third quarter and first nine months of 2016.enhanced custody business. The enhanced custody business is our securities financing business where we act as principal with respect to our custody clients and generate securities finance revenue.
Aggregate average U.S. and non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits decreased to $121.96 billion and $122.68 billion for The NII earned on these transactions is generally lower than the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, from $129.29 billion and $125.40 billion for the same periods in 2016. The lower levels in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the prior year period were a result of higher U.S. and non-U.S. interest bearing client deposit levels during the year, offset byearned on other alternative investments.
State Street Corporation | 1416
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
management's actionsAggregate average U.S. and non-U.S. interest-bearing deposits increased to reduce more expensive wholesale$126.58 billion and $126.90 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, from $125.16 billion and $123.05 billion for the same periods in 2017, respectively. The higher levels compared to the prior year periods were primarily a result of higher client deposit funding.levels. Future deposit levels will be influenced by the underlying asset servicing business, client deposit behavior as well asand market conditions, including the general levels of U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates.
Average other short-term borrowings, declinedlargely associated with our tax-exempt investment program, were flat for the three month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and decreased to $1.28 billion and $1.31$1.29 billion for the third quarter and first ninesix months of 2017, respectively,2018 from $1.57$1.33 billion for the same period in 2017.
Average other interest-bearing liabilities were $4.99 billion and $1.73$5.13 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $5.36 billion and $5.30 billion for the same periods in 2016, as bonds matured in the tax-exempt investment program.
Average long-term debt was $11.77 billion and $11.57 billion for the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, compared to $11.89 billion and $11.31 billion for the same periods in 2016. These amounts reflect issuances and maturities of senior debt during the respective periods.
Average other interest-bearing liabilities were $4.06 billion and $4.88 billion for the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, compared to $5.65 billion and $5.55 billion for the same periods in 2016.respectively. Other interest-bearing liabilities primarily reflect our level of cash collateral received from clients in connection with our enhanced custody business, which is presented on a net basis where we have enforceable netting agreements.
Several factors could affect future levels of NII and NIM, including the volume and mix of client liabilities;deposits and funding sources; actions of various central banks; changes in the level and slope of U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and the slope of various yield curves around the world;rates; revised or proposed regulatory capital or liquidity standards, or interpretations of those standards; the amount of discount accretion generated by the former conduit securities that remain in our investment securities portfolio; the yields earned on securities purchased compared to the yields earned on securities sold or matured;matured and changes in the type and amount of credit or other loans we extend; and changes in our enhanced custody business.extend.
Based on market conditions and other factors, including regulatory standards, we continue to reinvest the majority of the proceeds from pay-downs and maturities of investment securities in highly-rated U.S. and non-U.S. securities, such as U.S. Treasury and agency securities, municipalsovereign debt securities and federal agency MBS and U.S. and non-U.S. mortgage- and ABS.MBS. The pace at which we continue to reinvest and the types of investment securities purchased will depend on the impact of market conditions, the implementation of regulatory standards, including interpretation of those standards and other factors over time. We expect these factors and the levels of global interest rates to influence what effectimpact our reinvestment program will have onand future levels of our NII and NIM.
Expenses
Table 7:6: Expenses, provides the breakout of expenses for the quartersthree and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017.
| | | TABLE 7: EXPENSES | | | | | | |
| TABLE 6: EXPENSES | | TABLE 6: EXPENSES |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Compensation and employee benefits | $ | 1,090 |
| | $ | 1,013 |
| | 8 | % | $ | 1,125 |
| | $ | 1,071 |
| | 5 | % |
| Information systems and communications | 296 |
| | 285 |
| | 4 |
| 321 |
| | 283 |
| | 13 |
|
| Transaction processing services | 215 |
| | 200 |
| | 8 |
| 246 |
| | 207 |
| | 19 |
|
| Occupancy | 118 |
| | 107 |
| | 10 |
| 124 |
| | 116 |
| | 7 |
|
| Acquisition costs | — |
| | 33 |
| | (100 | ) | — |
| | 9 |
| | nm |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 33 |
| | 9 |
| | 267 |
| — |
| | 62 |
| | nm |
|
| Other: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Professional services | 71 |
| | 95 |
| | (25 | ) | 89 |
| | 97 |
| | (8 | ) |
| Amortization of other intangible assets | 54 |
| | 55 |
| | (2 | ) | 48 |
| | 54 |
| | (11 | ) |
| Securities processing costs | 4 |
| | 10 |
| | (60 | ) | |
| Regulatory fees and assessments | 24 |
| | 28 |
| | (14 | ) | 29 |
| | 18 |
| | 61 |
|
| Other | 116 |
| | 149 |
| | (22 | ) | 177 |
| | 114 |
| | 55 |
|
| Total other | 269 |
| | 337 |
| | (20 | ) | 343 |
| | 283 |
| | 21 |
|
| Total expenses | $ | 2,021 |
| | $ | 1,984 |
| | 2 |
| $ | 2,159 |
| | $ | 2,031 |
| | 6 |
|
| Number of employees at quarter-end | 36,303 |
| | 33,332 |
| | 9 |
| 38,113 |
| | 35,606 |
| | 7 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | % Change | 2018 | | 2017 | % Change |
| Compensation and employee benefits | $ | 3,327 |
| | $ | 3,109 |
| | 7 | % | $ | 2,374 |
| | $ | 2,237 |
| | 6 | % |
| Information systems and communications | 866 |
| | 827 |
| | 5 |
| 636 |
| | 570 |
| | 12 |
|
| Transaction processing services | 619 |
| | 601 |
| | 3 |
| 488 |
| | 404 |
| | 21 |
|
| Occupancy | 344 |
| | 331 |
| | 4 |
| 244 |
| | 226 |
| | 8 |
|
| Acquisition costs | 21 |
| | 47 |
| | (55 | ) | — |
| | 21 |
| | nm |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 112 |
| | 119 |
| | (6 | ) | — |
| | 79 |
| | nm |
|
| Other: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Professional services | 262 |
| | 270 |
| | (3 | ) | 168 |
| | 191 |
| | (12 | ) |
| Amortization of other intangible assets | 160 |
| | 153 |
| | 5 |
| 98 |
| | 106 |
| | (8 | ) |
| Securities processing costs | 20 |
| | 20 |
| | — |
| |
| Regulatory fees and assessments | 77 |
| | 65 |
| | 18 |
| 59 |
| | 45 |
| | 31 |
|
| Other | 330 |
| | 352 |
| | (6 | ) | 348 |
| | 238 |
| | 46 |
|
| Total other | 849 |
| | 860 |
| | (1 | ) | 673 |
| | 580 |
| | 16 |
|
| Total expenses | $ | 6,138 |
| | $ | 5,894 |
| | 4 |
| $ | 4,415 |
| | $ | 4,117 |
| | 7 |
|
nmNot meaningful
Compensation and employee benefits expenses increased 8%5% and 6% in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same period of 2016,periods in 2017, respectively, primarily due to increased costs to support new business, annual merit and performance based incentivea repositioning charge in the three months ended June 30, 2018, of which $61 million is included in compensation increases and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by Beacon savings.
Compensation and employee benefits, expenses increased 7% in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period of 2016, primarily due to higher annual merit and performance based incentive compensation increases, including higher seasonal deferred incentive compensation expense for retirement-eligible employees and payroll taxes in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016, increased costs to support new business and costs relatedannual merit increases, partially offset by Beacon savings and lower performance based incentive compensation.
Headcount increased 7% as of June 30, 2018 compared to the acquired GEAM operations.June 30, 2017. The growth in headcount was all within low cost locations and was driven by new business, as well as regulatory initiatives and contractor conversions to full-time employees, partially offset by reductions from Beacon. Headcount in high cost
State Street Corporation | 1517
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
These increases were partially offset by Beacon savings.
Headcount increased 9% in the third quarterlocations fell as of 2017June 30, 2018 compared to the same period of 2016. New business, including the impact of large client lift outs, as well as regulatory initiatives and contractor conversions to full-time employees contributed to this growth. The growth in headcount was primarily within low cost locations. These increases were partially offset by other reductions from Beacon initiatives.June 30, 2017.
Information systems and communications expenses increased 4%13% and 12% in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periodperiods in 2017, respectively. The increases were primarily a result of 2016Beacon-related investments and 5%costs to support new business.
Transaction processing services increased 19% and 21% in the first ninethree and six months of 2017ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same period of 2016. The increases wereperiods in 2017, respectively, primarily relateddue to technology infrastructure costs, new businesshigher client assets under custody, higher client volume and Beacon investments.trading activity and market growth.
Other expenses decreased 20%increased 21% and 16% in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same period of 2016,periods in 2017, respectively, primarily due to lower professional services fees.the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018.
As a systemically important financial institution, we are subject to enhanced supervision and prudential standards. Our status as a G-SIB has also resulted in heightened prudential and conduct expectations of our U.S. and international regulators with respect to our capital and liquidity management and our compliance and risk oversight programs. These heightened expectations have increased our regulatory compliance costs, including personnel and systems, as well as significant additional implementation and related costs to enhance our regulatory compliance programs. We anticipate that these evolving regulatory compliance requirements and expectations will continue to affect our expenses.
Restructuring Charges
In connection with Beacon, we expectannounced in 2016 that we expected:
(i) to incur aggregate pre-tax restructuring charges of approximately $300 million to $400 million beginning in 2016 through December 31, 2020. We estimate those charges will include2020, including approximately $250 million to $300 million in severance and benefits costs associated with targeted staff reductions (a substantial portion of which willwould result in future cash expenditures) and approximately $50 million to $100 million in information technology application rationalization and real estate actions. We expectactions; and
(ii) to achieve estimated annual pre-tax net run-rateyear-over-year expense savings of $550 million by the end of 2020, relative to 2015, all else equal, for full effect in 2021. Actual expenses may increase or decrease in the future due to other factors.
In both the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, we recorded no restructuring charges, of $33compared to $62 million and $112 million, respectively, compared to
$10 million and $120$79 million in the same periods of 2016, related to Beacon.
In the third quarter of 2017, we recognized approximately $35 million in year-over-year expense savingsrespectively, related to Beacon. In aggregate, we have recorded restructuring charges of approximately $386 million related to Beacon, including $299 million
in severance costs and $87 million in information technology application rationalization and real estate action.
In the first ninethree months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018, we achieved approximately $100$60 million of Beacon pre-tax year-over-year savings, net of Beacon investments, and expect total pre-tax year-over-year net savings of $200 million in expense2018 and our target Beacon expenses savings relativegoal of $550 million to our 2017 targetbe realized by early 2019, of $140 million.which $444 million has been realized as of June 30, 2018.
The following table presents aggregate restructuring activity for the periods indicated.
| | | TABLE 8: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES | |
| TABLE 7: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES | | TABLE 7: RESTRUCTURING CHARGES |
| (In millions) | Employee
Related Costs | | Real Estate
Actions | | Asset and Other Write-offs | | Total | Employee
Related Costs | | Real Estate
Actions | | Asset and Other Write-offs | | Total |
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 23 |
| |
| Accruals for Beacon | 86 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 97 |
| |
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (12 | ) | |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 108 |
| |
| Accruals for Beacon | (1 | ) | | 15 |
| | (1 | ) | | 13 |
| |
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (35 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (39 | ) | |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2016 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 82 |
| |
| Accruals for Beacon | 8 |
| | 3 |
| | (1 | ) | | 10 |
| |
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (14 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (18 | ) | |
| Accrual Balance at September 30, 2016 | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 74 |
| |
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 56 |
| $ | 37 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 56 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 16 |
| 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 16 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (13 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (18 | ) | (13 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 38 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 54 |
| 38 |
| | 14 |
| | 2 |
| | 54 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 60 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 62 |
| 60 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 62 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (11 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (16 | ) | (11 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2017 | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 100 |
| $ | 87 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 100 |
|
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2017 | | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 201 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 23 |
| | 9 |
| | 1 |
| | 33 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (10 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (16 | ) | (22 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (26 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at September 30, 2017 | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 117 |
| |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2018 | | 144 |
| | 28 |
| | 3 |
| | 175 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | | (31 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (34 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2018 | | $ | 113 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 141 |
|
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $137$131 million and $233 million in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $72 million in the third quarter of 2016. In the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, income tax expense was $375$156 million and $226$238 million for the same periods in 2017, respectively. Our effective tax rate forin the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017ended June 30, 2018 was 16.7%15.1%, and 17.2%14.3%, respectively, compared to 11.4%20.1% and 12.8%17.5% for the same periods in 2016.2017, respectively. The effective2018 tax rate forexpense included net benefits from the third quarterenactment of the Tax Cuts and first nine months of 2017 reflectJobs Act and an increase in excess deductions related to stock based compensation, partially offset by a decrease in alternative energy investments, partially offset by benefits from share-based compensationtax exempt income.
In the three months ended June 30, 2018, we continued to perform our analysis and evaluate interpretations and other guidance regarding the effects ofTax Cuts and Jobs Act, but did not record any adjustments to the disposition of BFDS.amounts recorded on a provisional basis in the year ended December 31, 2017 or deem any such amounts as complete.
State Street Corporation | 1618
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
LINE OF BUSINESS INFORMATION
Our operations are organized into two lines of business: Investment Servicing and Investment Management, which are defined based on products and services provided. The results of operations for these lines of business are not necessarily comparable with those of other companies, including companies in the financial services industry.
Investment Servicing provides services for institutional clients, including mutual funds, collective investment funds and other investment pools, corporate and public retirement plans, insurance companies, investment managers, foundations and endowments worldwide. Products include custody; product- and participant-level accounting; daily pricing and administration; master trust and master custody; record-keeping; cash management; foreign exchange, brokerage and other trading services; securities finance; our enhanced custody product, which integrates principal securities lending and custody; deposit and short-term investment facilities; loans and lease financing; investment manager and alternative investment manager operations outsourcing; and
outsourcing; and performance, risk and compliance analytics to support institutional investors.
Investment Management, through SSGA, provides a broad array of investment management, investment research and investment advisory services to corporations, public funds and other sophisticated investors. SSGA offers passive and active asset management strategies across equity, fixed-income, alternative, multi-asset solutions (including OCIO) and cash asset classes. Products are distributed directly and through intermediaries using a variety of investment vehicles, including ETFs, such as the SPDR ETF® ETF brand.
For information about our two lines of business, as well as the revenues, expenses and capital allocation methodologies associated with them, refer to pages 188179 to 189 provided181 in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K and Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Investment Servicing
| | | TABLE 9: INVESTMENT SERVICING LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 8: INVESTMENT SERVICING LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS | | TABLE 8: INVESTMENT SERVICING LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | |
| (Dollars in millions, except where otherwise noted) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Servicing fees | $ | 1,351 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| | 4 | % | | $ | 3,986 |
| | $ | 3,784 |
| | 5 | % | $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | 1,339 |
| | 3 | % | | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 2,635 |
| | 6 | % |
| Trading services | 239 |
| | 248 |
| | (4 | ) | | 768 |
| | 760 |
| | 1 |
| 282 |
| | 272 |
| | 4 |
| | 555 |
| | 529 |
| | 5 |
|
| Securities finance | 147 |
| | 136 |
| | 8 |
| | 459 |
| | 426 |
| | 8 |
| 154 |
| | 179 |
| | (14 | ) | | 295 |
| | 312 |
| | (5 | ) |
| Processing fees and other | 65 |
| | 12 |
| | 442 |
| | 203 |
| | 164 |
| | 24 |
| 41 |
| | 32 |
| | 28 |
| | 82 |
| | 138 |
| | (41 | ) |
| Total fee revenue | 1,802 |
| | 1,699 |
| | 6 |
| | 5,416 |
| | 5,134 |
| | 5 |
| 1,858 |
| | 1,822 |
| | 2 |
| | 3,734 |
| | 3,614 |
| | 3 |
|
| Net interest income | 606 |
| | 536 |
| | 13 |
| | 1,691 |
| | 1,567 |
| | 8 |
| 663 |
| | 576 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,311 |
| | 1,085 |
| | 21 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | nm |
| | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| | nm |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | nm |
| | 7 |
| | (40 | ) | | 118 |
|
| Total revenue | 2,409 |
| | 2,239 |
| | 8 |
| | 7,068 |
| | 6,706 |
| | 5 |
| 2,530 |
| | 2,398 |
| | 6 |
| | 5,052 |
| | 4,659 |
| | 8 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 3 |
| | — |
| | nm |
| | 4 |
| | 8 |
| | nm |
| 2 |
| | 3 |
| | (33 | ) | | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | nm |
|
| Total expenses | 1,673 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 2 |
| | 5,050 |
| | 4,920 |
| | 3 |
| 1,693 |
| | 1,649 |
| | 3 |
| | 3,551 |
| | 3,377 |
| | 5 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 605 |
| | 21 |
| | $ | 2,014 |
| | $ | 1,778 |
| | 13 |
| $ | 835 |
| | $ | 746 |
| | 12 |
| | $ | 1,499 |
| | $ | 1,281 |
| | 17 |
|
| Pre-tax margin | 30 | % | | 27 | % | | | | 28 | % | | 27 | % | | | 33 | % | | 31 | % | | | | 30 | % | | 27 | % | | |
nm Not meaningful
Servicing Fees
Servicing fees increased 4% in the third quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to higher global equity markets, net new business and the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by continued outflows and liquidations from hedge funds that we service.
Servicing fees increased 5% in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to higher global equity markets and net new business, partially offset by continued outflows and liquidations from hedge funds that we service. The first nine months of 2016 included a revenue reduction of $48 million related to
reimbursements to our clients related to the manner in which we invoiced certain expenses to our clients, as further described below.
Servicing fees generated outside the U.S. were approximately 47% and 45% of total servicing fees in both the third quarter and first nine months of 2017 compared to approximately 43% and 42% for the same periods in 2016, respectively.
In December 2015, we announced a review of the manner in which we invoiced certain expenses to certain of our Investment Servicing clients, primarily in the United States, during a period going back to 1998. We have substantially completed the reimbursement to our clients of an amount equal to
State Street Corporation | 1719
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Servicing Fees
Servicing fees increased 3% and 6% in the expenses we concluded were incorrectly invoiced to them, plus interest. Additional information about the invoicing matter is provided in Note 10three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the consolidated financial statements includedsame periods in this Form 10-Q.2017, respectively, primarily due to higher global equity markets, increased client activity, new business and the favorable impact of currency translation, partially offset by continued modest hedge fund outflows. Fees for investment servicing continue to experience pressure, though they are generally associated with client commitments to longer-term relationships.
Servicing fees generated outside the U.S. were approximately 46% of total servicing fees in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to approximately 44% for both of the same periods in 2017.
| | | TABLE 10: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY PRODUCT | |
| TABLE 9: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY PRODUCT | | TABLE 9: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY PRODUCT |
| (In billions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
| Mutual funds | $ | 7,394 |
| | $ | 6,841 |
| | $ | 6,906 |
| $ | 8,548 |
| | $ | 7,603 |
| | $ | 7,123 |
|
| Collective funds | 9,190 |
| | 7,501 |
| | 7,541 |
| 9,615 |
| | 9,707 |
| | 8,560 |
|
| Pension products | 6,571 |
| | 5,584 |
| | 5,671 |
| 6,808 |
| | 6,704 |
| | 5,937 |
|
| Insurance and other products | 8,955 |
| | 8,845 |
| | 9,060 |
| 8,896 |
| | 9,105 |
| | 9,417 |
|
| Total | $ | 32,110 |
| | $ | 28,771 |
| | $ | 29,178 |
| $ | 33,867 |
| | $ | 33,119 |
| | $ | 31,037 |
|
| | | TABLE 11: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY ASSET CLASS | |
| TABLE 10: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY ASSET CLASS | | TABLE 10: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY ASSET CLASS |
| (In billions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
| Equities | $ | 18,423 |
| | $ | 16,189 |
| | $ | 16,400 |
| $ | 19,475 |
| | $ | 19,214 |
| | $ | 17,304 |
|
| Fixed-income | 9,883 |
| | 9,231 |
| | 9,500 |
| 10,189 |
| | 10,070 |
| | 10,117 |
|
| Short-term and other investments | 3,804 |
| | 3,351 |
| | 3,278 |
| 4,203 |
| | 3,835 |
| | 3,616 |
|
| Total | $ | 32,110 |
| | $ | 28,771 |
| | $ | 29,178 |
| $ | 33,867 |
| | $ | 33,119 |
| | $ | 31,037 |
|
| | TABLE 12: GEOGRAPHIC MIX OF ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION(1) | |
TABLE 11: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY GEOGRAPHY(1) | | TABLE 11: ASSETS UNDER CUSTODY AND ADMINISTRATION BY GEOGRAPHY(1) |
| (In billions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
| North America | $ | 23,675 |
| | $ | 21,544 |
| | $ | 21,561 |
| $ | 24,989 |
| | $ | 24,418 |
| | $ | 23,020 |
|
| Europe/Middle East/Africa | 6,806 |
| | 5,734 |
| | 6,107 |
| 7,134 |
| | 7,028 |
| | 6,464 |
|
| Asia/Pacific | 1,629 |
| | 1,493 |
| | 1,510 |
| 1,744 |
| | 1,673 |
| | 1,553 |
|
| Total | $ | 32,110 |
| | $ | 28,771 |
| | $ | 29,178 |
| $ | 33,867 |
| | $ | 33,119 |
| | $ | 31,037 |
|
(1) Geographic mix is based on the location in which the assets are serviced.
The increaseAsset servicing mandates newly announced in total AUCAthe second quarter of 2018 totaled approximately $105 billion. Servicing assets remaining to be installed in future periods totaled approximately $300 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 primarily resulted from higher global equity markets. Asset levels as of September 30, 2017 do not reflect the approximately $390 billion of new business in assets to be serviced,2018, which was awarded to us in the first nine months of 2017 and prior periods but not installed prior to September 30, 2017, including approximately $105 billion of new asset servicing mandates awarded to us in the third quarter of 2017. This new business will be reflected in AUCA in future periods after installation and will generate servicing fee revenue in subsequent periods. The $390 billionfull revenue impact of new businesssuch mandates will be realized over several quarters as the assets are installed and additional services are added over that period.
New asset servicing mandates and servicing assets remaining to be serviced does not includeinstalled in future periods exclude certain new business which has been contracted, but for which the client has not yet provided
permission to publicly disclose and is not yet installed. Also not included is the loss of businessexpected installation date extends beyond one quarter. These excluded assets, which occurs from time to time may be significant, will be included in new asset servicing mandates and reflected in servicing assets remaining to be installed in the period in which the client provides its permission. Servicing mandates and servicing assets remaining to be installed in future periods are presented on a gross basis and therefore also do not include the impact of clients who have notified us during the period of their intent to terminate or changes in AUCA, usuallyreduce their relationship with us, which may from changes in market values of customer assets, subscriptions or redemptions from our customer investment products.time to time be significant.
With respect to these new assets,servicing mandates, once installed we willmay provide various services, including, accounting, bank loan servicing, compliance reporting and monitoring, custody, depository banking services, foreign exchange, fund administration, hedge fund servicing, middle-office outsourcing, performance and analytics, private equity administration, real estate administration, securities finance, transfer agency and wealth management services. Revenues associated with new servicing mandates may vary based on the breadth of services provided and the timing of installation, and the types of assets.
For additional information about the impact of worldwide equity and fixed income valuations on our fee revenue, including servicing fee revenue, refer to "Fee Revenue" in "Consolidated Results of Operations" included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.
As a result of a decision to diversify providers, one of our large clients willhas begun to move a portion of its assets, largely common trust funds, currently with State Street to another service provider. We expect to remain a significant service provider to this client. The transition, will principally occurwhich began in 2018 and is approximately fifty percent complete, represents approximately $1 trillion in assets with respect to which we will no longer derive revenue post-transition.
Trading Services
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 13: TRADING SERVICES REVENUE |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | |
| (Dollar in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change |
| Foreign exchange trading: | | | | | |
| Direct sales and trading | $ | 84 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | (11 | )% |
| Indirect foreign exchange trading | 66 |
| | 65 |
| | 2 |
|
| Total foreign exchange trading | 150 |
| | 159 |
| | (6 | ) |
| Brokerage and other trading services: | | | | | |
| Electronic foreign exchange services | 39 |
| | 41 |
| | (5 | ) |
| Other trading, transition management and brokerage | 50 |
| | 48 |
| | 4 |
|
| Total brokerage and other trading services | 89 |
| | 89 |
| | — |
|
| Total trading services revenue | $ | 239 |
| | $ | 248 |
| | (4 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change |
| Foreign exchange trading: | | | | | |
| Direct sales and trading | $ | 282 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | 4 | % |
| Indirect foreign exchange trading | 210 |
| | 201 |
| | 4 |
|
| Total foreign exchange trading | 492 |
| | 472 |
| | 4 |
|
| Brokerage and other trading services: | | | | | |
| Electronic foreign exchange services | 119 |
| | 128 |
| | (7 | ) |
| Other trading, transition management and brokerage | 157 |
| | 160 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Total brokerage and other trading services | 276 |
| | 288 |
| | (4 | ) |
| Total trading services revenue | $ | 768 |
| | $ | 760 |
| | 1 |
|
Trading services revenue, as presented in Table 8: Investment Servicing Line of Business Results, increased 4% and 5% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017, respectively, primarily due to higher client FX and electronic trading volumes. Trading services revenue is composed of revenue generated by FX trading, as well as revenue generated by brokerage and other trading services as noted in Table 13:2: Total Revenue.
Foreign Exchange Trading Services Revenue.Revenue
We primarily earn FX trading revenue by acting as a principal market-maker through both "direct sales and trading” and “indirect foreign exchange trading.”
State Street Corporation | 1820
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Foreign Exchange Trading RevenueDirect sales and trading: Represent FX transactions at negotiated rates with clients and investment managers that contact our trading desk directly. These principal market-making activities include transactions for funds serviced by third party custodians or prime brokers, as well as those funds under custody with us.
We primarily earnIndirect FX trading revenue by acting: Represent FX transactions with clients or their investment managers routed to our FX desk through our asset-servicing operation; in which all cases, we are the funds' custodian. We execute indirect FX trades as a principal market-maker. We offer a range of FX products, services and execution models. Most ofat rates disclosed to our FX products and execution services can be grouped into two broad categories, which are further explained below: “direct sales and trading” and “indirect foreign exchange trading.” Total FX trading revenue decreased 6% and increased 4% in the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2016. The decrease in the third quarter of 2017 was primarily due to lower foreign exchange volatility, partially offset by higher client-related volumes. The increase in the first nine months of 2017 was primarily due to higher client-related volumes.clients.
We also offer a range of brokerage and other trading products tailored specifically to meet the needs of the global pension community, including transition management and commission recapture. These products and services are generally offered by us as agent of the institutional investor. Revenue earned from these services is recorded in other trading, transition management and brokerage revenue within brokerage and other trading services revenue.
Our FX trading revenue is influenced by multiple factors, including: the volume and type of client FX transactions and related spreads; currency volatility, reflecting market conditions; and our management of exchange rate, interest rate and other market risks associated with our foreign exchange activities. The relative impact of these factors on our total FX trading revenues often differs from period to period. For example, assuming all other factors remain constant, increases or decreases in volumes or bid-offer spreads across product mix tend to result in increases or decreases, as the case may be, in client-related FX revenue. Revenue earned from direct sales and trading and indirect FX trading is recorded in FX trading revenue.
Total FX trading revenue is comprised of:
Direct sales and trading: We enter into FX transactions with clients and investment managers that contact our trading desk directly. These trades are all executed at negotiated rates. We refer to this activity, and our principal market-making activities, as “direct sales and trading” and it includes many transactions for funds serviced by third party custodians or prime brokers, as well as those funds under custody at State Street. Direct sales and trading revenue represents all of the FX trading revenue other than the revenue attributed to indirect FX trading. Direct sales and trading revenue represented
56% and 57% of total FX trading revenue in the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, compared to 59% and 57% for the same periods in 2016.
Indirect FX trading: Clients or their investment managers may elect to route FX transactions to our FX desk through our asset-servicing operation; we refer to this activity as “indirect FX trading” and, in all cases, we are the funds' custodian. We execute indirect FX trades as a principal at rates disclosed to our clients. Estimated indirect sales and trading revenue represented 44% and 43% of total FX trading revenue in the third quarter and first nine months of 2017, respectively, compared to 41% and 43% for the same periods in 2016. We calculate revenue for indirect FX trading using an attribution methodology. This methodology takes into consideration estimated mark-ups/downs and observed client volumes.
Our clients that utilize indirect FX trading can, in addition to executing their FX transactions through dealers not affiliated with us, transition from indirect FX trading to either direct sales and trading execution, including our “Street FX” service, or to one of our electronic trading platforms. Street FX, in which we continue to act as a principal market-maker, enables our clients to define their FX execution strategy and automate the FX trade execution process, both for funds under custody with us as well as those under custody at another bank.
We continue to expect that some clients may choose, over time, to reduce their level of indirect FX trading transactions in favor of other execution methods, including either direct salesBrokerage and trading transactions or electronic FX services which we provide. To the extent that clients shift to other execution methods that we provide, our FX trading revenue may decrease, even if volumes remain constant.Other Trading Services
Total brokerage and other trading services revenue was flat in the third quarterprimarily consists of 2017"electronic FX services" and decreased 4% in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016, primarily due to lower foreign exchange volatility compared to 2016, as well as the absence of revenue associated with the WM/ Reuters business, which we disposed of in the second quarter of 2016. Total"other trading, transition management and brokerage and other trading services revenue comprises:revenue."
Electronic FX services: Our clients may choose to execute FX transactions through one of our electronic trading platforms. These transactions generate revenue through a “click” fee.
State Street Corporation | 19
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Other trading, transition management and brokerage revenue: As our clients look to State Streetus to enhance and preserve portfolio values, they may choose to utilize our Transition or Currency Management capabilities or transact with our Equity Trade execution group. These transactions generate revenue via
commissions charged for trades transacted during the management of these portfolios.
In recent years, our transition management revenue was adversely affected by compliance issues in our U.K. business during 2010 and 2011, including settlements with the FCA in 2014 and the DOJ and SEC in 2017, the latter including a deferred prosecution agreement. The reputational and regulatory impact of those compliance issues continues and may adversely affect our results in future periods.
Securities Finance
Our securities finance business consists of three components:
(1) an agency lending program for SSGA-managed investment funds with a broad range of investment objectives, which we refer to as the SSGA lending funds;
(2) an agency lending program for third-party investment managers and asset owners, which we refer to as the agency lending funds; and
(3) security lending transactions which we enter into as principal, which we refer to as our enhanced custody business.
Securities finance revenue earned from our agency lending activities, which is composed of our split of both the spreads related to cash collateral and the fees related to non-cash collateral, is principally a function of the volume of securities on loan, the interest-rate spreads and fees earned on the underlying collateral and our share of the fee split.
As principal, our enhanced custody business borrows securities from the lending client or other market participants and then lends such securities to the subsequent borrower, either a State Streetour client or a broker/dealer. We act as principal when the lending client is unable to, or elects not to, transact directly with the market and execute the transaction and furnish the securities. In our role as principal, we provide support to the transaction through our credit rating. While we source a significant proportion of the securities furnished by us in our role as principal from third parties, we have the ability to source securities through our assets under custody and administration from clients who have designated State Street as an eligible borrower.
Securities finance revenue, as presented in Table 9:8: Investment Servicing Line of Business Results, increased 8%decreased 14% and 5% in both the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2016,2017, respectively, primarily theas a result of higher revenuelower lending activity in our enhanced custody business.
Market influences may continue to affect client demand for securities finance, and as a result our revenue from, and the profitability of, our securities lending activities in future periods. In addition, the
State Street Corporation | 21
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
constantly evolving regulatory environment, including revised or proposed capital and liquidity standards, and interpretations of those standards, and our own balance sheet management activities, may influence modifications to the way in which we deliver our agency lending or enhanced custody businesses, the volume of our securities lending activity and related revenue and profitability in future periods.
Processing Fees and Other
Processing fees and other revenue includes diverse types of fees and revenue, including fees from our structured products business, fees from software licensing and maintenance, equity income from our joint venture investments, gains and losses on sales of other assets derivative financial instruments to support our clients' needs and to manage our interest-rate and currency risk, and amortization of our tax-advantaged investments.
Processing fees and other revenue, presented in Table 9:8: Investment Servicing Line of Business Results, increased 442% and 24%28% in the third quarter and first ninethree months of 2017, respectively,ended June 30, 2018 compared to the same periodsperiod in 2016. The increase2017, largely
reflecting lower amortization related to tax-advantaged investments. Processing fees and other decreased 41% in the third quarter of 2017six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to the third quarter of 2016 issame period in 2017, primarily due to a pre-tax gainthe absence of approximately $26 million on the sale of an equity trading platform business in the third quarter of 2017. The increase in the first nine months of 2017 is primarily due to a pre-tax gain of $30 million on the dispositions of our joint venture interests in IFDS U.K. and BFDSgain in the first quarter of 2017 and the aforementioned sale of an equity trading platform business in the third quarter of 2017, partially offset by a pre-tax gain of approximately $53 million related tofrom the sale of WM/Reuters in 2016.a business.
State Street Corporation | 20
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Expenses
Total expenses for Investment Servicing increased 2%3% and 5% in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periodperiods in 2016, primarily reflecting installation of new business, annual merit and performance related incentive compensation expenses and the impact of the weaker U.S. dollar.
Total expenses increased 3% in the first nine months of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016,respectively. The increases are primarily due to higher annual merittechnology costs, costs to support new business and higher salaries and benefits, partially offset by lower performance based incentive compensation increases, including higher seasonal deferred incentive compensation expense for retirement
eligible employees and payroll taxes of approximately $28 million in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016, and increased costs to support new business.
The increases for both the three- and nine-month periods were partially offset by Beacon savings.
Additional information about expenses is provided under "Expenses"Expenses in Consolidated Results of Operations included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis inof this Form 10-Q.
Investment Management
| | | TABLE 14: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 12: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS | | TABLE 12: INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LINE OF BUSINESS RESULTS | | | | | | |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | % Change |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | | 2017 | | 2016 | | % Change | |
| (Dollars in millions, except where otherwise noted) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change | | 2018 | | 2017 | | % Change |
| Management fees | $ | 419 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | 14 | % | | $ | 1,198 |
| | $ | 931 |
| | 29 | % | $ | 465 |
| | $ | 397 |
| | 17 | % | | $ | 937 |
| | $ | 779 |
| |
Trading services(1) | 20 |
| | 19 |
| | 5 |
| | 55 |
| | 46 |
| | 20 |
| 33 |
| | 17 |
| | 94 |
| | 64 |
| | 35 |
| | 83 |
|
| Processing fees and other | 1 |
| | (7 | ) | | nm |
| | 6 |
| | (9 | ) | | nm |
| 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | nm |
| | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | (80 | ) |
| Total fee revenue | 440 |
| | 380 |
| | 16 |
| | 1,259 |
| | 968 |
| | 30 |
| 500 |
| | 413 |
| | 21 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 819 |
| | 22 |
|
| Net interest income | (3 | ) | | 1 |
| | nm |
| | (3 | ) | | 3 |
| | nm |
| (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | nm |
| | (9 | ) | | — |
| | nm |
|
| Total revenue | 437 |
| | 381 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,256 |
| | 971 |
| | 29 |
| 496 |
| | 412 |
| | 20 |
| | 993 |
| | 819 |
| | 21 |
|
| Total expenses | 314 |
| | 317 |
| | (1 | ) | | 954 |
| | 817 |
| | 17 |
| 389 |
| | 311 |
| | 25 |
| | 787 |
| | 640 |
| | 23 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 123 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | 92 |
| | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 154 |
| | 96 |
| $ | 107 |
| | $ | 101 |
| | 6 |
| | $ | 206 |
| | $ | 179 |
| | 15 |
|
| Pre-tax margin | 28 | % | | 17 | % | | | | 24 | % | | 16 | % | | | 22 | % | | 25 | % | | | | 21 | % | | 22 | % | | |
(1) Includes revenues associated with the SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF, for which we act as the marketing agent.
nm Not meaningful
Management Fees
Through SSGA, we provide a broad range of investment management strategies, specialized investment management advisory services, OCIO and other financial services for corporations, public funds and other sophisticated investors. SSGA offers an array of investment management strategies, including passive and active, such as enhanced indexing, using quantitative and fundamental methods for both U.S. and global equity and fixed income securities. SSGA also offers ETFs, such as the SPDR® ETF brand. While certain management fees are directly determined by the values of AUM and the investment strategies employed, management fees reflect other factors as well, including
our relationship pricing for clients who use multiple services and the benchmarks specified in the respective management agreements related to performance fees.
Management fees increased 14%17% and 20% in the third quarter of 2017three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periodperiods in 2016, primarily due to higher global equity markets, net new business and positive ETF flows, partially offset by institutional net outflows.
Management fees increased 29% in the first nine months of 2017, compared to the same period in 2016,respectively, primarily due to the acquired GEAM operations,adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018 and higher global equity markets and higher revenue yielding ETF inflows.markets.
Management fees generated outside the U.S. were approximately 28% of total management fees in both the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017, compared to 29%ended June 30, 2018 and 33% in the same periods in 2016, respectively. The percentage of management fees generated outside the U.S. for the first nine months of 2017 decreased from the same period in 2016 primarily due to the acquired GEAM operations.2017.
State Street Corporation | 2122
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | TABLE 15: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY ASSET CLASS AND INVESTMENT APPROACH | |
| TABLE 13: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY ASSET CLASS AND INVESTMENT APPROACH | | TABLE 13: ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY ASSET CLASS AND INVESTMENT APPROACH |
| (In billions) | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
| Equity: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Active | | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 70 |
| $ | 92 |
| | $ | 95 |
| | $ | 82 |
|
| Passive | | 1,545 |
| | 1,401 |
| | 1,340 |
| 1,575 |
| | 1,650 |
| | 1,512 |
|
| Total Equity | | 1,640 |
| | 1,474 |
| | 1,410 |
| 1,667 |
| | 1,745 |
| | 1,594 |
|
| Fixed-Income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Active | | 73 |
| | 70 |
| | 73 |
| 79 |
| | 77 |
| | 71 |
|
| Passive | | 326 |
| | 308 |
| | 318 |
| 358 |
| | 337 |
| | 327 |
|
| Total Fixed-Income | | 399 |
| | 378 |
| | 391 |
| 437 |
| | 414 |
| | 398 |
|
Cash(1) | | 347 |
| | 333 |
| | 351 |
| 333 |
| | 330 |
| | 334 |
|
| Multi-Asset-Class Solutions: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Active | | 18 |
| | 19 |
| | 19 |
| 18 |
| | 18 |
| | 18 |
|
| Passive | | 116 |
| | 107 |
| | 106 |
| 126 |
| | 129 |
| | 113 |
|
| Total Multi-Asset-Class Solutions | | 134 |
| | 126 |
| | 125 |
| 144 |
| | 147 |
| | 131 |
|
Alternative Investments(2): | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Active | | 24 |
| | 28 |
| | 29 |
| 22 |
| | 23 |
| | 27 |
|
| Passive | | 129 |
| | 129 |
| | 140 |
| 120 |
| | 123 |
| | 122 |
|
| Total Alternative Investments | | 153 |
| | 157 |
| | 169 |
| 142 |
| | 146 |
| | 149 |
|
| Total | | $ | 2,673 |
| | $ | 2,468 |
| | $ | 2,446 |
| $ | 2,723 |
| | $ | 2,782 |
| | $ | 2,606 |
|
(1) Includes both floating- and constant-net-asset-value portfolios held in commingled structures or separate accounts.
(2) Includes real estate investment trusts, currency and commodities, including SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF. State Street isWe are not the investment manager for the SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF, but acts as the marketing agent.
| | TABLE 16: EXCHANGE - TRADED FUNDS BY ASSET CLASS(1) | |
TABLE 14: EXCHANGE - TRADED FUNDS BY ASSET CLASS(1) | | TABLE 14: EXCHANGE - TRADED FUNDS BY ASSET CLASS(1) |
| (In billions) | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
Alternative Investments(2) | | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 46 |
|
| Cash | | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
| Equity | | 478 |
| | 426 |
| | 370 |
| | 524 |
| | 531 |
| | 460 |
|
| Fixed-income | | 61 |
| | 51 |
| | 52 |
| | 67 |
| | 63 |
| | 58 |
|
| Total Exchange-Traded Funds | | $ | 589 |
| | $ | 521 |
| | $ | 478 |
| | $ | 639 |
| | $ | 644 |
| | $ | 566 |
|
(1) ETFs are a component of AUM presented in the preceding table.
(2) Includes real estate investment trusts, currency and commodities, including SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF. State Street isWe are not the investment manager for the SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF, but acts as the marketing agent.
| | TABLE 17: GEOGRAPHIC MIX OF ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT(1) | |
TABLE 15: GEOGRAPHIC MIX OF ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT(1) | | TABLE 15: GEOGRAPHIC MIX OF ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT(1) |
| (In billions) | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | September 30, 2016 | | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | | June 30, 2017 |
| North America | | $ | 1,845 |
| | $ | 1,691 |
| | $ | 1,641 |
| | $ | 1,897 |
| | $ | 1,931 |
| | $ | 1,802 |
|
| Europe/Middle East/Africa | | 510 |
| | 482 |
| | 495 |
| | 495 |
| | 521 |
| | 496 |
|
| Asia/Pacific | | 318 |
| | 295 |
| | 310 |
| | 331 |
| | 330 |
| | 308 |
|
| Total | | $ | 2,673 |
| | $ | 2,468 |
| | $ | 2,446 |
| | $ | 2,723 |
| | $ | 2,782 |
| | $ | 2,606 |
|
(1) Geographic mix is based on client location or fund management location.
State Street Corporation | 2223
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | TABLE 18: ACTIVITY IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY PRODUCT CATEGORY | |
| TABLE 16: ACTIVITY IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY PRODUCT CATEGORY | | TABLE 16: ACTIVITY IN ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT BY PRODUCT CATEGORY |
| (In billions) | Equity | | Fixed-Income | | Cash(1) | | Multi-Asset-Class Solutions | | Alternative Investments(2) | | Total | Equity | | Fixed-Income | | Cash(1) | | Multi-Asset-Class Solutions | | Alternative Investments(2) | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 1,326 |
| | $ | 312 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | $ | 103 |
| | $ | 136 |
| | $ | 2,245 |
| |
Long-term institutional inflows(3) | 161 |
| | 62 |
| | — |
| | 34 |
| | 9 |
| | 266 |
| |
Long-term institutional outflows(3) | (206 | ) | | (71 | ) | | — |
| | (26 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (319 | ) | |
| Long-term institutional flows, net | (45 | ) | | (9 | ) | | — |
| | 8 |
| | (7 | ) | | (53 | ) | |
| ETF flows, net | (3 | ) | | 7 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | 13 |
| | 16 |
| |
| Cash fund flows, net | — |
| | | | (21 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (21 | ) | |
| Total flows, net | (48 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (22 | ) | | 8 |
| | 6 |
| | (58 | ) | |
| Market appreciation | 84 |
| | 19 |
| | 1 |
| | 11 |
| | 15 |
| | 130 |
| |
| Foreign exchange impact | 10 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 17 |
| |
| Total market/foreign exchange impact | 94 |
| | 25 |
| | 1 |
| | 11 |
| | 16 |
| | 147 |
| |
Acquisitions and transfers(4) | 38 |
| | 56 |
| | 4 |
| | 3 |
| | 11 |
| | 112 |
| |
| Balance as of September 30, 2016 | $ | 1,410 |
| | $ | 391 |
| | $ | 351 |
| | $ | 125 |
| | $ | 169 |
| | $ | 2,446 |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 1,474 |
| | $ | 378 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 126 |
| | $ | 157 |
| | $ | 2,468 |
| $ | 1,474 |
| | $ | 378 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 126 |
| | $ | 157 |
| | $ | 2,468 |
|
Long-term institutional inflows(3) | 182 |
| | 65 |
| | — |
| | 30 |
| | 16 |
| | 293 |
| 270 |
| | 94 |
| | — |
| | 56 |
| | 20 |
| | 440 |
|
Long-term institutional outflows(3) | (242 | ) | | (73 | ) | | — |
| | (33 | ) | | (32 | ) | | (380 | ) | (344 | ) | | (92 | ) | | — |
| | (52 | ) | | (41 | ) | | (529 | ) |
| Long-term institutional flows, net | (60 | ) | | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (3 | ) | | (16 | ) | | (87 | ) | (74 | ) | | 2 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | (21 | ) | | (89 | ) |
| ETF flows, net | (1 | ) | | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | 10 |
| 26 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 37 |
|
| Cash fund flows, net | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13 |
| — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Total flows, net | (61 | ) | | — |
| | 13 |
| | (3 | ) | | (13 | ) | | (64 | ) | (48 | ) | | 12 |
| | (8 | ) | | 4 |
| | (20 | ) | | (60 | ) |
| Market appreciation | 203 |
| | 12 |
| | (2 | ) | | 6 |
| | 4 |
| | 223 |
| 293 |
| | 15 |
| | 2 |
| | 12 |
| | 3 |
| | 325 |
|
| Foreign exchange impact | 24 |
| | 9 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | 46 |
| 26 |
| | 9 |
| | 3 |
| | 5 |
| | 6 |
| | 49 |
|
| Total market/foreign exchange impact | 227 |
| | 21 |
| | 1 |
| | 11 |
| | 9 |
| | 269 |
| 319 |
| | 24 |
| | 5 |
| | 17 |
| | 9 |
| | 374 |
|
| Balance as of September 30, 2017 | $ | 1,640 |
| | $ | 399 |
| | $ | 347 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 2,673 |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | 1,745 |
| | $ | 414 |
| | $ | 330 |
| | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 146 |
| | $ | 2,782 |
|
Long-term institutional inflows(3) | | 109 |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | 37 |
| | 9 |
| | 234 |
|
Long-term institutional outflows(3) | | (177 | ) | | (53 | ) | | — |
| | (37 | ) | | (8 | ) | | (275 | ) |
| Long-term institutional flows, net | | (68 | ) | | 26 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | (41 | ) |
| ETF flows, net | | (9 | ) | | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Cash fund flows, net | | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
|
| Total flows, net | | (77 | ) | | 30 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (42 | ) |
| Market appreciation | | 7 |
| | (5 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
| Foreign exchange impact | | (8 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (15 | ) |
| Total market/foreign exchange impact | | (1 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (4 | ) | | (17 | ) |
| Balance as of June 30, 2018 | | $ | 1,667 |
| | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 333 |
| | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 142 |
| | $ | 2,723 |
|
(1) Includes both floating- and constant-net-asset-value portfolios held in commingled structures or separate accounts. (2) Includes real estate investment trusts, currency and commodities, including SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF. State Street isWe are not the investment manager for the SPDR® Gold Shares ETF and SPDR® Long Dollar Gold Trust ETF, but acts as the marketing agent.
(3) Amounts represent long-term portfolios, excluding ETFs.
(4) Includes AUM acquired as part of the acquisition of GEAM on July 1, 2016.
The preceding table does not include approximately $29$19 billion of new asset management business which was awarded but not installed as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018. New business will be reflected in AUM in future periods after installation, and will generate management fee revenue in subsequent periods. Total AUM as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 included managed assets lost but not liquidated. Lost business occurs from time to time and it is difficult to predict the timing of client behavior in transitioning these assets. Thisassets as the timing can vary significantly.
Expenses
Total expenses for Investment Management increased 25% and 23% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2017, respectively. The increases are primarily due to the impact from the adoption of the new revenue recognition standard in 2018.
Additional information about expenses is provided under Expenses in Consolidated Results of Operations included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of this Form 10-Q.
State Street Corporation | 2324
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Expenses
Total expenses for Investment Management remained flat in the third quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Total expenses for Investment Management increased 17% in the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to higher annual merit and performance based incentive compensation increases, including higher seasonal deferred incentive compensation expense for retirement eligible employees and payroll taxes in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016 and increased costs to support new business. These increases were partially offset by Beacon savings.
Additional information about expenses is provided under "Expenses" in “Consolidated Results of Operations” in this Management's Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The structure of our consolidated statement of condition is primarily driven by the liabilities generated by our Investment Servicing and Investment Management lines of business. Our clients' needs and our operating objectives determine balance sheet volume, mix and currency denomination. As our clients execute their worldwide cash management and investment activities, they utilize deposits and short-term investments that constitute the majority of our liabilities. These liabilities are generally in the form of interest-bearing transaction account deposits, which are denominated in a variety of currencies; non-interest-bearing demand deposits; and repurchase agreements, which generally serve as short-term investment alternatives for our clients.
Deposits and other liabilities resulting from client initiated transactions are invested in assets that generally have contractual maturities significantly longer than our liabilities; however, we evaluate the operational nature of our deposits and seek to maintain appropriate short-term liquidity of those liabilities that are not operational in nature and maintain longer-termed assets for our operational deposits. Our assets consist primarily of securities held in our AFS or HTM portfolios and short-duration financial instruments, such as interest-bearing deposits with banks and securities purchased under resale agreements. The actual mix of assets is determined by the characteristics of the client liabilities and our desire to maintain a well-diversified portfolio of high-quality assets.
TABLE 19: AVERAGE STATEMENT OF CONDITION(1) | |
TABLE 17: AVERAGE STATEMENT OF CONDITION(1) | | TABLE 17: AVERAGE STATEMENT OF CONDITION(1) |
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In millions) | Average Balance | | Average Balance | Average Balance | | Average Balance |
| Assets: | | | | | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | $ | 49,171 |
| | $ | 52,423 |
| $ | 53,346 |
| | $ | 51,031 |
|
| Securities purchased under resale agreements | 2,192 |
| | 2,610 |
| 2,672 |
| | 2,205 |
|
| Trading account assets | 949 |
| | 908 |
| 1,138 |
| | 928 |
|
| Investment securities | 95,716 |
| | 101,243 |
| 90,836 |
| | 95,921 |
|
| Loans and leases | 21,360 |
| | 18,674 |
| 23,790 |
| | 20,607 |
|
| Other interest-earning assets | 22,952 |
| | 22,316 |
| 17,564 |
| | 22,882 |
|
| Average total interest-earning assets | 192,340 |
| | 198,174 |
| 189,346 |
| | 193,574 |
|
| Cash and due from banks | 3,181 |
| | 3,402 |
| 3,532 |
| | 3,224 |
|
| Other non-interest-earning assets | 24,973 |
| | 27,052 |
| 32,594 |
| | 24,779 |
|
| Average total assets | $ | 220,494 |
| | $ | 228,628 |
| $ | 225,472 |
| | $ | 221,577 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Liabilities and shareholders’ equity: | Liabilities and shareholders’ equity: | | | Liabilities and shareholders’ equity: | | |
| Interest-bearing deposits: | | | | | | |
| U.S. | $ | 25,821 |
| | $ | 30,388 |
| $ | 49,461 |
| | $ | 25,849 |
|
| Non-U.S. | 96,860 |
| | 95,013 |
| 77,438 |
| | 97,201 |
|
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 122,681 |
| | 125,401 |
| 126,899 |
| | 123,050 |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 3,965 |
| | 4,107 |
| 2,629 |
| | 3,961 |
|
| Federal funds purchased | 1 |
| | 33 |
| — |
| | 1 |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | 1,313 |
| | 1,727 |
| 1,287 |
| | 1,332 |
|
| Long-term debt | 11,569 |
| | 11,306 |
| 11,029 |
| | 11,469 |
|
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 4,881 |
| | 5,550 |
| 5,126 |
| | 5,298 |
|
| Average total interest-bearing liabilities | 144,410 |
| | 148,124 |
| 146,970 |
| | 145,111 |
|
| Non-interest-bearing deposits | 42,043 |
| | 43,806 |
| 36,997 |
| | 43,241 |
|
| Other non-interest-bearing liabilities | 12,130 |
| | 14,697 |
| 19,200 |
| | 11,539 |
|
| Preferred shareholders’ equity | 3,197 |
| | 3,015 |
| 3,197 |
| | 3,197 |
|
| Common shareholders’ equity | 18,714 |
| | 18,986 |
| 19,108 |
| | 18,489 |
|
| Average total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | $ | 220,494 |
| | $ | 228,628 |
| $ | 225,472 |
| | $ | 221,577 |
|
(1) Additional information about our average statement of condition, primarily our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, is provided in "Net Interest Income" in this Management's Discussion and Analysis included in this Form 10-Q.Analysis.
State Street Corporation | 2425
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Investment Securities | | | TABLE 20: CARRYING VALUES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES | |
| TABLE 18: CARRYING VALUES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES | | TABLE 18: CARRYING VALUES OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES |
| (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Available-for-sale: | U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | Direct obligations | $ | 620 |
| | $ | 4,263 |
| $ | 11 |
| | $ | 223 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 11,000 |
| | 13,257 |
| 15,893 |
| | 10,872 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 15,904 |
| | 11,095 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | |
Student loans(1) | 4,826 |
| | 5,596 |
| 1,567 |
| | 3,358 |
|
| Credit cards | 1,548 |
| | 1,351 |
| 617 |
| | 1,542 |
|
| Sub-prime | — |
| | 272 |
| |
| Other | 1,221 |
| | 905 |
| 851 |
| | 1,447 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 7,595 |
| | 8,124 |
| 3,035 |
| | 6,347 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 7,074 |
| | 6,535 |
| 2,615 |
| | 6,695 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 2,839 |
| | 2,516 |
| 1,657 |
| | 2,947 |
|
| Government securities | 6,658 |
| | 5,836 |
| 13,072 |
| | 10,721 |
|
| Other | 5,818 |
| | 5,613 |
| 4,452 |
| | 6,108 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 22,389 |
| | 20,500 |
| 21,796 |
| | 26,471 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | 9,738 |
| | 10,322 |
| 4,228 |
| | 9,151 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,528 |
| | 2,593 |
| 319 |
| | 1,054 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | 2,928 |
| | 2,469 |
| 2,066 |
| | 2,560 |
|
| U.S. equity securities | 46 |
| | 42 |
| — |
| | 46 |
|
| Non-U.S. equity securities | — |
| | 3 |
| |
| U.S. money-market mutual funds | 394 |
| | 409 |
| — |
| | 397 |
|
| Non-U.S. money-market mutual funds | — |
| | 16 |
| |
| Total | $ | 56,238 |
| | $ | 61,998 |
| $ | 47,348 |
| | $ | 57,121 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Held-to-maturity(2): | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | Direct obligations | $ | 17,456 |
| | $ | 17,527 |
| $ | 15,992 |
| | $ | 17,028 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 12,375 |
| | 10,334 |
| 17,443 |
| | 16,651 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 33,435 |
| | 33,679 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | |
Student loans(1) | 3,116 |
| | 2,883 |
| 2,892 |
| | 3,047 |
|
| Credit cards | 798 |
| | 897 |
| 710 |
| | 798 |
|
| Other | 1 |
| | 35 |
| 1 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 3,915 |
| | 3,815 |
| 3,603 |
| | 3,846 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 1,000 |
| | 1,150 |
| 727 |
| | 939 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 325 |
| | 531 |
| 231 |
| | 263 |
|
| Government securities | 483 |
| | 286 |
| 404 |
| | 474 |
|
| Other | 47 |
| | 113 |
| 47 |
| | 48 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 1,855 |
| | 2,080 |
| 1,409 |
| | 1,724 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,249 |
| | 1,413 |
| 1,147 |
| | 1,209 |
|
| Total | $ | 36,850 |
| | $ | 35,169 |
| $ | 39,594 |
| | $ | 40,458 |
|
(1) Primarily composed of securities guaranteed by the federal government with respect to at least 97% of defaulted principal and accrued interest on the underlying loans.
(2) Includes securities at amortized cost or fair value on the date of transfer from AFS.
Additional information about our investment securities portfolio is provided in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
We manage our investment securities portfolio to align with the interest-rate and duration characteristics of our client liabilities that we consider to be operational deposits and in the context of the overall structure of our consolidated statement of condition, in consideration of the global interest-rate environment. We consider a well-diversified, high-credit quality investment securities portfolio to be an important element in the management of our consolidated statement of condition.
InAverage duration of our investment securities portfolio increased to 3.2 years as of June 30, 2018, compared to 2.7 years as of December 31, 2017. The increase in securities duration reflects a shift towards a strategy where the first quarterinvestment portfolio will target less credit exposure, more HQLA interest rate risk, and higher balances of 2017, wecash or cash equivalents.
We sold $2.7approximately $16 billion of AFS,non-HQLA securities during the six months ended June 30, 2018, primarily Agency MBSasset-backed securities and U.S. Treasurymunicipal bonds. $11 billion of sale proceeds were reinvested back into the securities portfolio focused mostly on HQLA assets. Additional portfolio reinvestment of the securities sales will occur over time with a portion likely to either be held in our investment portfolio, in responsecash or cash equivalents or used to the current interest rate environment resulting in a pre-tax loss of $40 million.fund client lending activities.
Approximately 91%90% of the carrying value of the portfolio was rated “AAA” or “AA” as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017.
| | | TABLE 21: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY EXTERNAL CREDIT RATING | |
| TABLE 19: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY EXTERNAL CREDIT RATING | | TABLE 19: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY EXTERNAL CREDIT RATING |
| | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
AAA(1) | 76 | % | | 78 | % | 76 | % | | 74 | % |
| AA | 15 |
| | 13 |
| 14 |
| | 16 |
|
| A | 5 |
| | 5 |
| 6 |
| | 6 |
|
| BBB | 3 |
| | 3 |
| 4 |
| | 4 |
|
| Below BBB | 1 |
| | 1 |
| — |
| | — |
|
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
(1) Includes U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities that are split-rated, “AAA” by Moody’s Investors Service and “AA+” by Standard & Poor’s.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the investment portfolio of 10,703 securities was diversified with respect to asset class. Approximately 53%class composition. The following table presents the composition of the aggregate carrying value of the portfolio as of September 30, 2017 was composed of MBS and ABS, compared to 52% as of December 31, 2016. The ABS portfolio, of which approximately 96% and 93% of the carrying value as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, was floating-rate, consisted primarily of student loan-backed and credit card-backed securities. MBS were composed of securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC, as well as U.S. and non-U.S. large-issuer collateralized mortgage obligations.these asset classes.
|
| | | | | |
| TABLE 20: INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO BY ASSET CLASS |
| | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| US Treasuries | 18 | % | | 17 | % |
| US Agency MBS | 36 |
| | 26 |
|
| ABS | 14 |
| | 22 |
|
| Foreign Sovereign | 16 |
| | 12 |
|
| Other Credit | 16 |
| | 23 |
|
| | 100 | % | | 100 | % |
State Street Corporation | 2526
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Non-U.S. Debt Securities
Approximately 26%27% of the aggregate carrying value of our investment securities portfolio was non-U.S. debt securities as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, compared to approximately 23%29% as of December 31, 2016.2017.
| | | TABLE 22: NON-U.S. DEBT SECURITIES | |
| TABLE 21: NON-U.S. DEBT SECURITIES | | TABLE 21: NON-U.S. DEBT SECURITIES |
| (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Available-for-sale: | | | | | | |
| United Kingdom | $ | 5,320 |
| | $ | 5,093 |
| $ | 3,731 |
| | $ | 5,721 |
|
| Australia | 4,461 |
| | 4,272 |
| 3,075 |
| | 4,717 |
|
| Canada | 3,749 |
| | 2,989 |
| 2,457 |
| | 3,066 |
|
| France | 1,658 |
| | 1,013 |
| 2,201 |
| | 2,500 |
|
| Netherlands | 1,338 |
| | 1,283 |
| |
| Belgium | | 1,440 |
| | 1,193 |
|
| Japan | 1,020 |
| | 1,388 |
| 1,342 |
| | 1,319 |
|
| Italy | 999 |
| | 676 |
| 1,321 |
| | 1,645 |
|
| Belgium | 774 |
| | 360 |
| |
| Spain | | 1,116 |
| | 1,413 |
|
| Ireland | | 1,009 |
| | 787 |
|
| Netherlands | | 983 |
| | 1,175 |
|
| Austria | | 949 |
| | 234 |
|
| Finland | | 610 |
| | 299 |
|
| Germany | | 509 |
| | 529 |
|
| Hong Kong | 633 |
| | 664 |
| 407 |
| | 666 |
|
| Germany | 488 |
| | 713 |
| |
| Sweden | 479 |
| | 188 |
| 377 |
| | 538 |
|
| Spain | 424 |
| | 266 |
| |
| Norway | 419 |
| | 508 |
| 173 |
| | 514 |
|
| South Korea | 201 |
| | 634 |
| |
| Finland | 124 |
| | 223 |
| |
Other(1) | 302 |
| | 230 |
| 96 |
| | 155 |
|
| Total | $ | 22,389 |
| | $ | 20,500 |
| $ | 21,796 |
| | $ | 26,471 |
|
| Held-to-maturity: | | | | | | |
| United Kingdom | $ | 452 |
| | $ | 504 |
| $ | 381 |
| | $ | 410 |
|
| Singapore | | 287 |
| | 353 |
|
| Netherlands | 390 |
| | 473 |
| 231 |
| | 372 |
|
| Singapore | 364 |
| | 180 |
| |
| Australia | 250 |
| | 374 |
| 181 |
| | 235 |
|
| Germany | 171 |
| | 329 |
| 117 |
| | 127 |
|
| Spain | 104 |
| | 98 |
| 98 |
| | 104 |
|
Other(2) | 124 |
| | 122 |
| 114 |
| | 123 |
|
| Total | $ | 1,855 |
| | $ | 2,080 |
| $ | 1,409 |
| | $ | 1,724 |
|
(1) Included approximately $182 million and $164$37 million as of SeptemberDecember 31, 2017, related to Portugal, which was related to MBS and auto loans.
(2) Included approximately $67 million and $75 million as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, related to Ireland, AustriaItaly and Portugal, all of which were related to MBS and auto loans.
(2) Included approximately $76 millionApproximately 75% and $80 million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, related to Italy, Portugal and Norway all of which were related to MBS and auto loans.
Approximately 88%80% of the aggregate carrying value of these non-U.S. debt securities was rated “AAA” or “AA” as of both SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016.2017, respectively. The majority of these securities comprised senior positions within the security structures; these positions have a level of protection provided through subordination and other forms of credit protection. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, approximately 65%40% and 61%, respectively, of the aggregate carrying value of these non-U.S. debt securities was floating-rate and, accordingly,therefore, we consider these securities to have minimal interest-rate risk.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, our non-U.S. debt securities had an average market-to-book ratio of 100.6%100.3%, and an aggregate pre-tax net unrealized gain of approximately $146$73 million, composed of gross unrealized gains of $176$144 million and gross unrealized losses of $30$71 million. These unrealized amounts included included;
a pre-tax net unrealized gainloss of $66$6 million, composed of gross unrealized gains of $89$60 million and gross unrealized losses of $23$66 million, associated with non-U.S. debt securities available-for-sale.available-for-sale and;
a pre-tax net unrealized gain of $79 million, composed of gross unrealized gains of $84 million and gross unrealized losses of $5 million, associated with non-U.S. debt securities held-to-maturity.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the underlying collateral for non-U.S. MBS and ABS primarily included U.K., Australian, Dutch, Italian, and U.K. primeDutch mortgages and German auto loans.U.K. and Eurozone consumer ABS. The securities listed under “Canada” were composed of Canadian government securities and corporate debt and covered bonds. The securities listed under “France” were composed of auto loans, prime mortgages,sovereign bonds and corporate debt and covered bonds. The securities listed under “Japan” were substantially composed of Japanese government securities and corporate debt.securities.
Municipal Obligations
We carried approximately $9.744.23 billion of municipal securities classified as state and political subdivisions in our investment securities portfolio as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 as shown in Table 20:18: Carrying Values of Investment Securities, all of which were classified as AFS. As of the same date, we also provided approximately $9.52$9.23 billion of credit and liquidity facilities to municipal issuers.
| | TABLE 23: STATE AND MUNICIPAL OBLIGORS(1) | |
TABLE 22: STATE AND MUNICIPAL OBLIGORS(1) | | TABLE 22: STATE AND MUNICIPAL OBLIGORS(1) |
| (Dollars in millions) | Total Municipal Securities | | Credit and Liquidity Facilities(2) | | Total | | % of Total Municipal Exposure | Total Municipal Securities | | Credit and Liquidity Facilities(2) | | Total | | % of Total Municipal Exposure |
| As of September 30, 2017 | | | | | | | |
| As of June 30, 2018 | | As of June 30, 2018 | | | | | | |
| State of Issuer: | | State of Issuer: | | | | | | |
| California | | $ | 231 |
| | $ | 2,083 |
| | $ | 2,314 |
| | 17 | % |
| New York | | 496 |
| | 1,727 |
| | 2,223 |
| | 17 |
|
| Texas | | 511 |
| | 1,590 |
| | 2,101 |
| | 16 |
|
| Massachusetts | | 707 |
| | 991 |
| | 1,698 |
| | 13 |
|
| Washington | | 284 |
| | 365 |
| | 649 |
| | 5 |
|
| Total | | $ | 2,229 |
| | $ | 6,756 |
| | $ | 8,985 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2017 | | | | | | |
| State of Issuer: | State of Issuer: | | | | | | | State of Issuer: | | | | | | |
| Texas | $ | 1,774 |
| | $ | 1,764 |
| | $ | 3,538 |
| | 18 | % | $ | 1,713 |
| | $ | 1,622 |
| | $ | 3,335 |
| | 18 | % |
| California | 461 |
| | 2,266 |
| | 2,727 |
| | 14 |
| 415 |
| | 2,237 |
| | 2,652 |
| | 14 |
|
| New York | 743 |
| | 1,288 |
| | 2,031 |
| | 11 |
| 742 |
| | 1,288 |
| | 2,030 |
| | 11 |
|
| Massachusetts | 891 |
| | 992 |
| | 1,883 |
| | 10 |
| 859 |
| | 991 |
| | 1,850 |
| | 10 |
|
| Washington | 682 |
| | 327 |
| | 1,009 |
| | 5 |
| 623 |
| | 366 |
| | 989 |
| | 5 |
|
| Total | $ | 4,551 |
| | $ | 6,637 |
| | $ | 11,188 |
| | | $ | 4,352 |
| | $ | 6,504 |
| | $ | 10,856 |
| | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | |
| State of Issuer: | | | | | | | |
| Texas | $ | 1,781 |
| | $ | 1,685 |
| | $ | 3,466 |
| | 18 | % | |
| California | 523 |
| | 2,298 |
| | 2,821 |
| | 14 |
| |
| New York | 740 |
| | 1,293 |
| | 2,033 |
| | 10 |
| |
| Massachusetts | 916 |
| | 1,071 |
| | 1,987 |
| | 10 |
| |
| Washington | 708 |
| | 234 |
| | 942 |
| | 5 |
| |
| Maryland | 488 |
| | 411 |
| | 899 |
| | 5 |
| |
| Total | $ | 5,156 |
| | $ | 6,992 |
| | $ | 12,148 |
| | | |
$19.26$13.46 billion and $19.57$18.47 billion across our businesses as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.(2) Includes municipal loans which are also presented within Table 25.23: U.S. and Non-U.S. Loans and Leases.
State Street Corporation | 2627
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our aggregate municipal securities exposure presented in Table 23:22: State and Municipal Obligors, was concentrated primarily with highly-rated counterparties, with approximately 92%86% of the obligors rated “AAA” or “AA” as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018. As of that date, approximately 49%34% and 50%65% of our aggregate municipal securities exposure was associated with general obligation and revenue bonds, respectively. The portfolios are also diversified geographically, with the states that represent our largest exposures widely dispersed across the U.S.
Impairment
Impairment exists when the fair value of an individual security is below its amortized cost basis. Impairment of a security is further assessed to determine whether such impairment is other-than-temporary. When the impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary, we record the loss in our consolidated statement of income. In addition, forFor AFS and HTM debt securities, we record impairment in our consolidated statement of income when management intends to sell (or may be required to sell) the securities before they recover in value, or when management expects the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the securities to be less than the amortized cost of the impaired security (a credit loss).
The change in the net unrealized gain/(loss) position as of September 30, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016, presented in Table 24: Amortized Cost, Fair Value and Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) of Investment Securities, was primarily attributable to higher interest rates.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 24: AMORTIZED COST, FAIR VALUE AND NET UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES |
| | September 30, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Amortized Cost | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Fair Value |
Available-for-sale(1) | $ | 55,882 |
| | $ | 356 |
| | $ | 56,238 |
|
Held-to-maturity(2) | 36,850 |
| | (14 | ) | | 36,836 |
|
| Total investment securities | $ | 92,732 |
| | $ | 342 |
| | $ | 93,074 |
|
| Net after-tax unrealized gain (loss) | | | $ | 205 |
| | |
| | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2016 |
| (In millions) | Amortized Cost | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Fair Value |
Available-for-sale(1) | $ | 62,056 |
| | $ | (58 | ) | | $ | 61,998 |
|
Held-to-maturity(2) | 35,169 |
| | (175 | ) | | 34,994 |
|
| Total investment securities | $ | 97,225 |
| | $ | (233 | ) | | $ | 96,992 |
|
| Net after-tax unrealized gain (loss) | | | $ | (140 | ) | | |
(1) AFS securities are carried at fair value, with after-tax net unrealized gains and losses recorded in AOCI.
(2) HTM securities are carried at amortized cost, and unrealized gains and losses are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements, other than for those that have been impaired.
We conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether OTTI exists. Our assessment of OTTI involves an evaluation of economic and security-specific factors. Such factors are based on estimates, derived by management, which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance. To the extent that market conditions are worse than management's expectations or due to idiosyncratic bond performance, OTTI could increase, in particular the credit-related component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income.
We recorded less than $1 million of OTTI in the third quarter of 2017 and $2 million in the third quarter of 2016. Management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining investment securities and the resulting gross unrealized losses of $434 million as of September 30, 2017 to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities. Additional information with respect to OTTI, net impairment losses and gross unrealized losses is provided in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Our evaluation of potential OTTI of structured credit securities with collateral in the U.K. and Italycontinental Europe takes into account the outcome from the Brexit referendum and the Italian constitutional referendum,other geopolitical events, and assumes no disruption of payments on these securities.
State Street Corporation | 27
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Loans and Leases
| | | TABLE 25: U.S. AND NON- U.S. LOANS AND LEASES | |
| TABLE 23: U.S. AND NON- U.S. LOANS AND LEASES | | TABLE 23: U.S. AND NON- U.S. LOANS AND LEASES |
| (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Domestic: | | | | | | |
| Commercial and financial | $ | 18,273 |
| | $ | 16,412 |
| $ | 18,227 |
| | $ | 18,696 |
|
| Commercial real estate | — |
| | 27 |
| 285 |
| | 98 |
|
| Lease financing | 283 |
| | 338 |
| 78 |
| | 267 |
|
| Total domestic | 18,556 |
| | 16,777 |
| 18,590 |
| | 19,061 |
|
| Non-U.S.: | | | | | | |
| Commercial and financial | 4,652 |
| | 2,476 |
| 5,181 |
| | 3,837 |
|
| Lease financing | 430 |
| | 504 |
| 353 |
| | 396 |
|
| Total non-U.S. | 5,082 |
| | 2,980 |
| 5,534 |
| | 4,233 |
|
| Total loans and leases | $ | 23,638 |
| | $ | 19,757 |
| $ | 24,124 |
| | $ | 23,294 |
|
The increase in loans in the total domestic and non-U.S. loans in the commercial and financial segment as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 compared to December 31, 20162017 was primarily driven by higher levels of loans to investment fundsoverdrafts and loans to municipalities.senior secured bank loans.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, our investment in senior secured loans totaled approximately $3.9$3.7 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively. In addition, we had binding unfunded commitments as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 of $332$763 million and $76$279 million, respectively, to participate in such syndications.
These senior secured loans, which are primarily rated “speculative” under our internal risk-rating framework are externally rated “BBB,” “BB” or “B,” with approximately 90% of the loans rated “BB” or “B” as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Information about our internal risk-rating framework is provided in(refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.10-Q), are externally rated “BBB,” “BB” or “B,” with approximately 91% and 89% of the loans rated “BB” or “B” as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Our investment strategy involves generally limiting our investment to larger, more liquid credits underwritten by major global financial institutions, applying our internal credit analysis process to each potential investment and diversifying our exposure by counterparty and industry segment. However, these loans have significant exposure to credit losses relative to higher-rated loans.
Loans to municipalities included in the commercial and financial segment were $2.0$1.8 billion and $1.4$2.1 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, unearned income deducted from our investment in leveraged lease financing was $77 million and $94 million, respectively, for U.S. leases and $161 million and $192 million, respectively, for non-U.S. leases.
Additional information about all of our loan-and-leases segments, as well as underlying classes, is
provided in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
No loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
|
| | | | | | | |
| TABLE 26: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Allowance for loan and lease losses: | | | |
| Beginning balance | $ | 53 |
| | $ | 46 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses(1) | 4 |
| | 8 |
|
Charge-offs(2) | — |
| | (3 | ) |
| Ending balance | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 51 |
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 24: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Allowance for loan and lease losses: | | | | |
| Beginning balance | | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 53 |
|
Provision for loan and lease losses(1) | | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
Charge-offs(2) | | (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
(1) The provision for loan and lease losses is related to commercial and financial loans in the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.loans.
(2) The charge-offs are related to commercial and financial loans.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 approximately $49$47 million and $46 million, respectively, of our allowance for loan and lease losses were related to senior secured loans included in the commercial and financial segment. As this portfolio grows and matures, our allowance for loan and lease losses related to these loans may increase through additional provisions for credit losses. The remaining $9$8 million as of both June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, was related to other components of commercial and financial loans.
Cross-Border Outstandings
Cross-border outstandings are amounts payable to us by non-U.S. counterparties which are denominated in U.S. dollars or other non-local currency, as well as non-U.S. local currency claims not funded by local currency liabilities. Our cross-border outstandings consist primarily of deposits with banks; loans and lease financing, including short-duration advances; investment securities; amounts related to foreign exchange and interest-rate contracts; and securities finance. In addition to credit risk, cross-border outstandings have the risk that, as a result of political or economic conditions in a country, borrowers may be unable to meet their contractual repayment obligations of principal and/or interest when due because of the unavailability of, or restrictions on, foreign exchange needed by borrowers to repay their obligations.
As market and economic conditions change, the major independent credit rating agencies may downgrade U.S. and non-U.S. financial institutions and sovereign issuers which have been, and may in the future be, significant counterparties to us, or whose financial instruments serve as collateral on which we rely for credit risk mitigation purposes, and may do so again in the future. As a result, we may be
State Street Corporation | 28
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
exposed to increased counterparty risk, leading to negative ratings volatility.
The cross-border outstandings presented in Table 27:25: Cross-Border Outstandings, represented approximately 30%29% and 28%26% of our consolidated total assets as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
| | TABLE 27: CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS(1) | |
TABLE 25: CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS(1) | | TABLE 25: CROSS-BORDER OUTSTANDINGS(1) |
| (In millions) | Investment Securities and Other Assets | | Derivatives and Securities on Loan | | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Investment Securities and Other Assets | | Derivatives and Securities on Loan | | Total Cross-Border Outstandings |
| September 30, 2017 | |
| | | | | |
| United Kingdom | $ | 17,808 |
| | $ | 1,225 |
| | $ | 19,033 |
| |
| June 30, 2018 | | |
| | | | |
| Germany | 18,727 |
| | 267 |
| | 18,994 |
| $ | 25,239 |
| | $ | 802 |
| | $ | 26,041 |
|
| Japan | 15,607 |
| | 674 |
| | 16,281 |
| 13,943 |
| | 1,147 |
| | 15,090 |
|
| United Kingdom | | 12,659 |
| | 2,503 |
| | 15,162 |
|
| Australia | 5,344 |
| | 631 |
| | 5,975 |
| 3,914 |
| | 877 |
| | 4,791 |
|
| Canada | 4,334 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 5,394 |
| 3,189 |
| | 1,098 |
| | 4,287 |
|
| France | 2,273 |
| | 300 |
| | 2,573 |
| 2,919 |
| | 470 |
| | 3,389 |
|
| Switzerland | 2,023 |
| | 457 |
| | 2,480 |
| |
| December 31, 2016 | | | |
| | |
| |
| Ireland | | 1,645 |
| | 1,187 |
| | 2,832 |
|
| December 31, 2017 | | | | |
| | |
|
| Germany | | $ | 18,201 |
| | $ | 295 |
| | $ | 18,496 |
|
| Japan | | 15,250 |
| | 549 |
| | 15,799 |
|
| United Kingdom | $ | 18,712 |
| | $ | 1,761 |
| | $ | 20,473 |
| 12,051 |
| | 1,253 |
| | 13,304 |
|
| Japan | 17,922 |
| | 1,171 |
| | 19,093 |
| |
| Germany | 13,812 |
| | 484 |
| | 14,296 |
| |
| Australia | 5,122 |
| | 986 |
| | 6,108 |
| 5,278 |
| | 390 |
| | 5,668 |
|
| Luxembourg | 3,389 |
| | 762 |
| | 4,151 |
| |
| Canada | 3,179 |
| | 781 |
| | 3,960 |
| 4,215 |
| | 707 |
| | 4,922 |
|
| France | | 2,684 |
| | 344 |
| | 3,028 |
|
(1) Cross-border outstandings included countries in which we do business, and which amounted to at least 1% of our consolidated total assets as of the dates indicated.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, countries whose aggregate cross-border outstandings in countries which amounted to between 0.75% and 1% of our consolidated assets totaledwere Luxembourg and Switzerland at approximately $2.15$2.34 billion to Netherlands.and $2.12 billion, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,2017, there were no countries whose aggregate cross-border outstandings in countries which amounted to between 0.75% and 1% of our consolidated assets totaled approximately $1.84 billion and $2.38 billion to France and the Netherlands, respectively.assets.
Risk Management
In the normal course of our global business activities, we are exposed to a variety of risks, some inherent in the financial services industry, others more specific to our business activities. Our risk management framework focuses on material risks, which include the following:
credit and counterparty risk;
liquidity risk, funding and management;
operational risk;
information technology risk;
market risk associated with our trading activities;
market risk associated with our non-trading activities, which we refer to as asset-and-liability management, and which consists primarily of interest-rate risk;
model risk; and
reputational, fiduciary and business conduct risk.
State Street Corporation | 29
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Many of these risks, as well as certain of the factors underlying each of these risks that could affect our businesses and our consolidated financial statements, are discussed in detail included under Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
For additional information about our risk management, including our risk appetite framework and risk governance committee structure, refer to pages 8075 to 8580 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Credit Risk Management
We define credit risk as the risk of financial loss if a counterparty, borrower or obligor, collectively referred to as a counterparty, is either unable or unwilling to repay borrowings or settle a transaction in accordance with underlying contractual terms. We assume credit risk in our traditional non-trading lending activities, such as loans and contingent commitments, in our investment securities portfolio, where recourse to a counterparty exists, and in our direct and indirect trading activities, such as principal securities lending and foreign exchange and indemnified agency securities lending. We also assume credit risk in our day-to-day treasury and securities and other settlement operations, in the form of deposit placements and other cash balances, with central banks or private sector institutions.
For additional information about our credit risk management, including our core policies and principles, structure and organization, credit ratings, risk parameter estimates, credit risk mitigation, credit limits, reporting, monitoring, controls and reserve for credit losses, refer to pages 8580 to 9085 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Liquidity Risk Management
Our liquidity framework contemplates areas of potential risk based on our activities, size and other appropriate risk-related factors. In managing liquidity risk we employ limits, maintain established metrics and early warning indicators and perform routine stress testing to identify potential liquidity needs. This process involves the evaluation of a combination of internal and external scenarios which assist us in measuring our liquidity position and in identifying potential increases in cash needs or decreases in available sources of cash, as well as the potential impairment of our ability to access the global capital markets.
State Street Corporation | 29
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We manage our liquidity on a global, consolidated basis. We also manage liquidity on a stand-alone basis at the Parent Company, as well as at certain branches and subsidiaries of State Street Bank. State Street Bank generally has access to markets and funding sources limited to banks, such as the federal funds market and the Federal Reserve's discount window. OurThe Parent Company is managed to a more conservative liquidity profile, reflecting narrower market access. OurAdditionally, the Parent Company typically holds, or has direct access to, primarily through SSIF (a recently formed direct subsidiary of the Parent Company) and the support agreement, as discussed in the "Uses of Liquidity" section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis, enough cash to meet its current debt maturities and cash needs, as well as those projected over the next one-year period. As of September 30, 2017, the value of our Parent Company's net liquid assets decreased to $0.57 billion from $3.64 billion as of December 31, 2016. The decrease was due to the funding of SSIF in connection withReference our SPOE Strategy as discussed in the "Uses of Liquidity" section of this Management's Discussion and Analysis. Absent certain triggers reflecting financial distress at the Parent Company, the liquidityliquid assets transferred to SSIF continuescontinue to be available to the Parent Company. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, our2018, the Parent Company and State Street Bank had approximately $1 billion$402 million of senior notes and junior subordinated debentures outstanding that will mature in the next twelve months.
As a systemically important financial institution, our liquidity risk management activities are subject to heightened and evolving regulatory requirements, including interpretations of those requirements, under specific U.S. and international regulations and also resulting from published and unpublished guidance, supervisory activities, such as stress tests, resolution planning, examinations and other regulatory interactions. Satisfaction of these requirements could, in some cases, result in changes in the composition of our investment portfolio, reduced NII or NIM, a reduction in the level of certain business activities or modifications to the way in which we deliver our products and services. If we fail to meet regulatory requirements to the satisfaction of our regulators, we could receive negative regulatory stress test results, incur a resolution plan deficiency or determination of a non-credible resolution plan or otherwise receive an adverse regulatory finding. Our efforts to satisfy, or our failure to satisfy, these regulatory requirements could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
For additional information on our liquidity risk management, as well as liquidity risk metrics, refer to page 91pages 85 to 90 included under Item 7, Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, in our 20162017 Form 10-K. For additional information on our liquidity ratios, including LCR and NSFR, refer to pages 7 andto 8 included under Item 1, Business, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
State Street Corporation | 30
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Asset Liquidity
Central to the management of our liquidity is asset liquidity, which consists primarily of unencumbered highly liquid securities, cash and cash equivalents reported on our consolidated statement of condition. We restrict the eligibility of securities to be characterized as asset liquidity to U.S. Government and federal agency securities (including MBS), securities of selected non-U.S. GovernmentGovernments and supranational securitiesorganizations as well as certain other high-quality securities which generally are more liquid than other types of assets even in times of stress. In 2014,As a banking organization, we are subject to a minimum LCR under the LCR rule approved by U.S. banking regulators issued a final rule to implement the BCBS' LCR in the United States.regulators. The LCR is intended to promote the short-term resilience of internationally active banking organizations, like State Street, to improve the banking industry's ability to absorb shocks arising from market stress over a 30 calendar day period and improve the measurement and management of liquidity risk. The LCR measures an institution’s HQLA against its net cash outflows. HQLA primarily consists of unencumbered cash and certain high quality liquid securities that qualify for inclusion under the LCR rule. The LCR was fully implemented beginning on January 1, 2017. We report LCR to the Federal Reserve daily. In addition, in December 2016,For the Federal Reserve issued a final rule requiring large banking organizations, including us, to publicly disclose certain qualitative and quantitative information about their LCR. We were required to comply with the disclosure requirements beginning on April 1, 2017. As of Septemberquarters ended June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, our2017, daily average LCR for the Parent Company was in excess of 100%. With the release of the new disclosure requirements, we are now presenting average quarterly HQLA balances versus our historical presentation of the period end balances.108% and 112%, respectively. The average HQLA for ourthe Parent Company under the LCR final rule was $67.23$87.03 billion and $87.20$65.35 billion, post-prescribed haircuts, as of Septemberfor the quarters ended June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
| | | TABLE 28: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE HQLA BY TYPE OF ASSET | |
| TABLE 26: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE HQLA BY TYPE OF ASSET | | TABLE 26: COMPONENTS OF AVERAGE HQLA BY TYPE OF ASSET |
| | | Quarters Ended | | Quarters Ended |
| (In millions) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Excess central bank balances | | $ | 38,222 |
| | $ | 48,407 |
| | $ | 45,100 |
| | $ | 33,584 |
|
| U.S. Treasuries | | 10,804 |
| | 17,770 |
| | 10,775 |
| | 10,278 |
|
| Other investment securities | | 11,796 |
| | 15,442 |
| | 21,249 |
| | 13,422 |
|
| Foreign government | | 6,409 |
| | 5,585 |
| | 9,902 |
| | 8,064 |
|
| Total | | $ | 67,231 |
| | $ | 87,204 |
| | $ | 87,026 |
| | $ | 65,348 |
|
With respect to highly liquid short-term investments presented in the preceding table, we
State Street Corporation | 30
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
maintained average cash balances in excess of regulatory requirements governing deposits with the Federal Reserve of approximately $38.22$45.10 billion at the Federal Reserve, the ECB and other non-U.S. central banks for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared to $48.41$33.58 billion as offor the quarter ended December 31, 2016.2017. The lowerhigher levels of depositsaverage cash balances with central banks as ofquarter-endSeptember 30, 2017 compared to quarter-end December 31, 2016 was due to normal deposit volatility. The decreaseincrease in other investment securities as of Septemberaverage HQLA for the quarter ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2016,2017 presented in the table above was primarily associated with repositioning the investment portfolio in light a result
of the liquidity requirementssale of $16 billion in non-HQLA securities during the LCR.six months ended June 30, 2018.
Liquid securities carried in our asset liquidity include securities pledged without corresponding advances from the FRBB, the FHLB and other non-U.S. central banks. State Street Bank is a member of the FHLB. This membership allows for advances of liquidity in varying terms against high-quality collateral, which helps facilitate asset-and-liability management.
Access to primary, intra-day and contingent liquidity provided by these utilities is an important source of contingent liquidity with utilization subject to underlying conditions. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we had no outstanding primary credit borrowings from the FRBB discount window or any other central bank facility, and as of the same dates, no FHLB advances were outstanding.
In addition to the securities included in our asset liquidity, we have significant amounts of other unencumbered investment securities. The aggregate fair value of those securities was $38.05 billion as of September 30, 2017, compared to $54.40 billion as of December 31, 2016. These securities are available sources of liquidity, although not as rapidly deployed as those included in our asset liquidity.
The average fair value of total unencumbered securities was $64.59 billion for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared to $66.10 billion for the quarter December 31, 2017.
Uses of Liquidity
Significant uses of our liquidity could result from the following: withdrawals of client deposits; draw-downs by our custody clients of lines of credit; advances to clients to settle securities transactions; or other permitted purposes. Such circumstances would generally arise under stress conditions including deterioration in credit ratings. A recurring significant use of our liquidity involves our deployment of HQLA from our investment portfolio to post collateral to financial institutions serving as sources of securities under our enhanced custody program.
We had unfunded commitments to extend credit with gross contractual amounts totaling $27.01$26.65 billion and $26.99$26.49 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. These amounts do not reflect the value of any collateral. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, approximately 73%72% of our
unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year. Since many of our commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon, the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements.
Resolution Planning
State Street, like other bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, periodically submits a plan for rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure-commonlyfailure, commonly referred to as a resolution plan or a living will-towill, to the Federal Reserve and the FDIC under
State Street Corporation | 31
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Through resolution planning, we seek, in the event of theour insolvency, of State Street, to maintain State Street Bank’s role as a key infrastructure provider within the financial system, while minimizing risk to the financial system and maximizing value for the benefit of our stakeholders. We have and will continue to focus management attention and resources to meet regulatory expectations with respect to resolution planning.
We submitted our 2017 resolution plan describing our preferred resolution strategy to the Federal Reserve and FDIC on June 30, 2017. Subsequently, the Federal Reserve and FDIC extended the next resolution plan filing deadline for eight large domestic banks, including State Street,us, to July 1, 2019. The agencies'agencies completed their review of theour 2017 165(d) resolution plans is on-goingplan in December 2017 and found no deficiencies or shortcomings in the extension does not affect any actions the agencies may take concerning our resolution plan.
In the event of material financial distress or failure, our preferred resolution strategy is the SPOE Strategy. For additional information about the SPOE Strategy, refer to pages 1110 and 1211 included under Item 1, Business, in our 20162017 Form 10-K. The SPOE Strategy provides that prior to the bankruptcy of the Parent Company and pursuant to a support agreement among the Parent Company, SSIF, (a recently formed direct subsidiary of the Parent Company), State Street’sour Beneficiary Entities (as defined below) and certain other State Streetof our entities, SSIF is obligated, up to its available resources, to recapitalize and/or provide liquidity to State Street Bank and theour other State Street entities benefiting from such capital and/or liquidity (collectively with State Street Bank, “Beneficiary Entities”), in amounts designed to prevent the Beneficiary Entities from themselves entering into resolution proceedings. Following the recapitalization of, or provision of liquidity to the Beneficiary Entities, the Parent Company would enter into a bankruptcy proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Beneficiary Entities and other State Streetour subsidiaries would be transferred to a newly organized holding company
State Street Corporation | 31
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
held by a reorganization trust for the benefit of the Parent Company’s claimants.
Under the support agreement, the Parent Company has pre-funded SSIF by contributing certain of its assets (primarily its liquid assets, cash deposits, debt investments, investments in marketable securities and other cash and non-cash equivalent investments) to SSIF contemporaneous with entering into the support agreement and will continue to contribute such assets, to the extent available, on an on-going basis. In consideration for these contributions, SSIF has agreed in the support agreement to provide capital and liquidity support to the Parent Company and all of the Beneficiary Entities in accordance with the Parent Company’s capital and liquidity policies. Under the support agreement, the Parent Company is only permitted to retain certain amounts of cash needed to meet its upcoming obligations and to fund expenses during a potential bankruptcy proceeding. SSIF has
provided the Parent Company with a committed credit line and issued (and may issue) one or more promissory notes to the Parent Company (the "Parent Company Funding Notes") that together are intended to allow State Streetus to continue to meet its obligations throughout the period prior to the occurrence of a "Recapitalization Event" (as defined below). The support agreement does not contemplate that SSIF is obligated to maintain any specific level of resources and SSIF may not have sufficient resources to implement the SPOE Strategy.
In the event a Recapitalization Event occurs, the obligations outstanding under the Parent Company Funding Notes would automatically convert into or be exchanged for capital contributed to SSIF. The obligations of the Parent Company and SSIF under the support agreement are secured through a security agreement that grants a lien on the assets that the Parent Company and SSIF would use to fulfill their obligations under the support agreement to the Beneficiary Entities. SSIF is a distinct legal entity separate from the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s other affiliates.
In accordance with its policies, State Street iswe are required to monitor, on an ongoing basis, the capital and liquidity needs of State Street Bank and the other Beneficiary Entities. To support this process, State Street haswe have established a trigger framework that identifies key actions that would need to be taken or decisions that would need to be made if certain events tied to State Street’sour financial condition occur. In the event that State Street experienceswe experience material financial distress, the support agreement requires State Streetus to model and calculate certain capital and liquidity triggers on a regular basis to determine whether or not the Parent Company should
commence preparations for a bankruptcy filing and whether or not a Recapitalization Event has occurred.
Upon the occurrence of a Recapitalization Event: (1) SSIF would not be authorized to provide any further liquidity to the Parent Company; (2) the Parent Company would be required to contribute to SSIF any remaining assets it is required to contribute to SSIF under the support agreement; (3) the Parent Company would be expected to commence Chapter 11 proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code; and (4) SSIF would be required to provide capital and liquidity support to the Beneficiary Entities to support such entities’ continued operation.operation; and (4) the Parent Company would be expected to commence Chapter 11 proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. No person or entity, other than a party to the support agreement, should rely, including in evaluating any State Street entityof our entities from a creditor's perspective or determining whether to enter into a contractual relationship with any State Street entity,of our entities, on any State Street affiliateof our affiliates being or remaining a Beneficiary Entity or receiving capital or liquidity support pursuant to the support agreement.
A “Recapitalization Event” is defined under the support agreement as the earlier occurrence of one or
State Street Corporation | 32
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
more capital and liquidity thresholds being breached or the authorization by the Parent Company's Board of Directors for the Parent Company to commence bankruptcy proceedings. These thresholds are set at levels intended to provide for the availability of sufficient capital and liquidity to enable an orderly resolution without extraordinary government support. The SPOE Strategy and the obligations under the support agreement may result in the recapitalization of State Street Bank and the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings by the Parent Company at an earlier stage of financial stress than might otherwise occur without such mechanisms in place. An expected effect of the SPOE Strategy and applicable TLAC regulatory requirements is that State Street’s losses will be imposed on the Parent Company shareholders and the holders of long-term debt and other forms of TLAC securities currently outstanding or issued in the future by the Parent Company, as well as on any other Parent Company creditors, before any of its losses are imposed on the holders of the debt securities of the Parent Company's operating subsidiaries or any of their depositors or creditors, or before U.S. taxpayers are put at risk.
There can be no assurance that credit rating agencies, in response to our 2017 resolution plan or the support agreement, will not downgrade, place on negative watch or change their outlook on our debt credit ratings, generally or on specific debt securities. Any such downgrade, placement on negative watch or change in outlook could adversely affect our cost of borrowing, limit our access to the capital markets or result in restrictive covenants in future debt
State Street Corporation | 32
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
agreements and could also adversely impact the trading prices, or the liquidity, of our outstanding debt securities.
State Street Bank is also required to submit annually to the FDIC a plan for resolution in the event of its failure, referred to as an IDI plan. The FDIC has extended the date for the nextWe filed our most recent IDI plan submission to July 1, 2018. This IDI plan will satisfy the annual plan submission requirements under the IDI Rule for 2016, 2017 andon June 28, 2018.
Funding
Deposits
We provide products and services including custody, accounting, administration, daily pricing, foreign exchange services, cash management, financial asset management, securities finance and investment advisory services. As a provider of these products and services, we generate client deposits, which have generally provided a stable, low-cost source of funds. As a global custodian, clients place deposits with State Street entities in various currencies. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, approximately 60% of our average clienttotal deposit balances were denominated in U.S. dollars.dollars, approximately 20% in EUR, 10% in GBP and 10% in all other currencies.
For the past several years, we have frequently experienced higher client deposit inflows toward the end of each fiscal quarter or the end of the fiscal year. As a result, we believe average client deposit balances are more reflective of ongoing funding than period-end balances.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 29: TOTAL DEPOSITS |
| | | | Average Balance |
| | September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Client deposits | $ | 176,263 |
| | $ | 183,900 |
| | $ | 159,564 |
| | $ | 153,612 |
|
| Wholesale CDs | 3,000 |
| | 14,865 |
| | 5,160 |
| | 15,595 |
|
| Total deposits | $ | 179,263 |
| | $ | 198,765 |
| | $ | 164,724 |
| | $ | 169,207 |
|
Short-Term Funding
Our on-balance sheet liquid assets are also an integral component of our liquidity management strategy. These assets provide liquidity through maturities of the assets, but more importantly, they provide us with the ability to raise funds by pledging the securities as collateral for borrowings or through outright sales. In addition, our access to the global capital markets gives us the ability to source incremental funding at reasonable rates of interest from wholesale investors. As discussed earlier under “Asset Liquidity,” State Street Bank's membership in the FHLB allows for advances of liquidity with varying terms against high-quality collateral.
Short-term secured funding also comes in the form of securities lent or sold under agreements to repurchase. These transactions are short-term in nature, generally overnight and are collateralized by high-quality investment securities. These balances were $3.86$3.09 billion and $4.40$2.84 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
State Street Bank currently maintains a line of credit with a financial institution of CAD 1.40 billion, or approximately $1.12$1.06 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, to support its Canadian securities processing operations. The line of credit has no stated termination date and is cancelable by either party with prior notice. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, there was no balance outstanding on this line of credit.
Long-Term Funding
State Street Corporation maintains an effectiveWe have the ability to issue debt and equity securities under our current universal shelf registration statement that allows forto meet current commitments and business needs, including accommodating the public offeringtransaction and salecash management needs of debt securities, capital securities, common stock, depositary shares and preferred stock, and warrants to purchase such securities, including any shares into which the preferred stock and depositary shares may be convertible, or any combination thereof. We have issued in the past, and we may issue in the future, securities pursuant to our shelf registration statement. The issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions, funding needs and other factors.
As of September 30, 2017, State Street Bank had Board authority to issue unsecured senior debt securities from time to time, provided that the aggregate principal amount of such unsecured senior debt outstanding at any one time does not exceed $5 billion. As of September 30, 2017, $3.25 billion was available for issuance pursuant to this authority. As of September 30, 2017,clients. In addition, State Street Bank also had Board authorityhas authorization to issue up to $5 billion in unsecured senior debt and an additional $500 million of subordinated debt.
Agency Credit Ratings
Our ability to maintain consistent access to liquidity is fostered by the maintenance of high investment-grade ratings as measured by the major independent credit rating agencies. Factors essential to maintaining high credit ratings include:
diverse and stable core earnings;
relative market position;
strong risk management;
strong capital ratios;
diverse liquidity sources, including the global capital markets and client deposits;
strong liquidity monitoring procedures; and
preparedness for current or future regulatory developments.
State Street Corporation | 33
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
preparedness for current or future regulatory developments.
High ratings limit borrowing costs and enhance our liquidity by:
providing assurance for unsecured funding and depositors;
increasing the potential market for our debt and improving our ability to offer products;
serving markets; and
engaging in transactions in which clients value high credit ratings.
A downgrade or reduction of our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity by restricting our ability to access the capital markets, which could increase the related cost of funds. In turn, this could cause the sudden and large-scale withdrawal of unsecured deposits by our clients, which could lead to draw-downs of unfunded commitments to extend credit or trigger requirements under securities purchase commitments; or require additional collateral or force terminations of certain trading derivative contracts.
A majority of our derivative contracts have been entered into under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require us to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in our credit ratings. We assess the impact of these arrangements by determining the collateral that would be required assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies. The additional collateral or termination payments related to our net derivative liabilities under these arrangements that could have been called by counterparties in the event of a downgrade in our credit ratings below levels specified in the agreements is disclosed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. Other funding sources, such as secured financing transactions and other margin requirements, for which there are no explicit triggers, could also be adversely affected.
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk encompasses fiduciary risk and legal risk. Fiduciary risk is defined as the risk that State Street failswe fail to properly exercise itsour fiduciary duties in itsour provision of products or services to clients. Legal risk is the risk of loss resulting from failure to comply with laws and contractual obligations as well as prudent ethical standards in business practices in addition to exposure to litigation from all aspects of State Street’sour activities.
For additional information about our operational risk framework, refer to pages 9590 to 9893 included
under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Information Technology Risk Management
Technology risk is defined as the risk associated with the use, ownership, operation, involvement, influence and adoption of information technology. Technology risk includes risks potentially triggered by technology non-compliance with regulatory obligations, information security and privacy incidents, business disruption, technology internal control and process gaps, technology operational events and adoption of new business technologies.
For additional information about our informational technology risk management framework, refer to pages 93 to 94 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 2017 Form 10-K.
Market Risk Management
Market risk is defined by U.S. banking regulators as the risk of loss that could result from broad market movements, such as changes in the general level of interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates or commodity prices. We are exposed to market risk in both our trading and certain of our non-trading, or asset-and-liability management, activities.
Information about the market risk associated with our trading activities is provided below under “Trading Activities.” Information about the market risk associated with our non-trading activities, which consists primarily of interest-rate risk, is provided below under “Asset-and-Liability Management Activities.”
Trading Activities
In the conduct of our trading activities, we assume market risk, the level of which is a function of our overall risk appetite, business objectives and liquidity needs, our clients' requirements and market volatility, and our execution against those factors.
For additional information about the market risk associated with our trading activities, refer to pages 9894 to 9995 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
As part of our trading activities, we assume positions in the foreign exchange and interest-rate markets by buying and selling cash instruments and entering into derivative instruments, including foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign exchange and interest-rate options and interest-rate swaps, interest-rate forward contracts, and interest-rate futures. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the notional amount of these derivative contracts was $1.67$2.25 trillion, of which $1.65$2.23 trillion was composed of foreign exchange forward, swap and spot contracts. We seek to match positions closely with the objective of minimizing related currency and interest-rate risk. All foreign exchange contracts are valued daily at current market rates.
State Street Corporation | 34
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Value-at-Risk Stress Testing and Stressed VaR
We use a variety of risk measurement tools and methodologies, including VaR, which is an estimate of potential loss for a given period within a stated statistical confidence interval. We use a risk measurement methodology to measure trading-related VaR daily. We have adopted standards for measuring trading-relatedtrading related VaR, and we maintain regulatory capital for market risk associated with our trading activities in conformity with currently applicable bank regulatory market risk requirements.
State Street Corporation | 34
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For additional information about our VaR measurement tools and methodologies, refer to pages 101 to 104 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 2016 Form 10-K.
Stress Testing and Stressed VaR
We have a corporate-wide stress testing program in place that incorporates an array of techniques to Our regulatory VaR-based measure the potential loss we could suffer in a hypothetical scenario of adverse economic and financial conditions. We also monitor concentrations of risk such as concentration by branch, risk component, and currency pairs. We conduct stress testing on a daily basisis calculated based on selected historical stress events that are relevantvolatilities of market risk factors during a two-year observation period calibrated to our positions in order to estimate the potential impact to our current portfolio should similar market conditions recur,a one-tail, 99% confidence interval and we also perform stress testing as part of the Federal Reserve's CCAR process. Stress testing is conducted, analyzed and reported at the corporate, trading desk, division and risk-factor level (for example, exchange risk, interest-rate risk and volatility risk).a ten-business-day holding period.
We calculate a stressed VaR-based measure using the same model we use to calculate VaR, but with model inputs calibrated to historical data from a range of continuous twelve-month periods that reflect significant financial stress. The stressed VaR model identifies the second-worst outcome occurring in the worst continuous one-year rolling period since July 2007. This stressed VaR meets the regulatory requirement as the rolling ten-day period with an outcome that is worse than 99% of other outcomes during that twelve-month period of financial stress. For each portfolio, the stress period is determined algorithmically by seeking the one-year time horizon that produces the largest ten-business-day VaR from within the available historical data. This historical data set includes the financial crisis of 2008, the highly volatile period surrounding the Eurozone
sovereign debt crisis and the Standard & Poor's downgrade of U.S. Treasury debt in August 2011. As the historical data set used to determine the stress period expands over time, future market stress events will be automatically incorporated.
For additional information about our VaR measurement tools and methodologies, refer to pages 96 to 100 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 2017 Form 10-K.
Stress Testing
We have a corporate-wide stress testing program in place that incorporates an array of techniques to measure the potential loss we could suffer in a hypothetical scenario of adverse economic and financial conditions. We also monitor concentrations of risk such as concentration by branch, risk component, and currency pairs. We conduct stress testing on a daily basis based on selected historical stress events that are relevant to our positions in order to estimate the potential impact to our current portfolio should similar
market conditions recur, and we also perform stress testing as part of the Federal Reserve's CCAR process. Stress testing is conducted, analyzed and reported at the corporate, trading desk, division and risk-factor level (for example, exchange risk, interest-rate risk and volatility risk).
Stress testing results and limits are actively monitored on a daily basis by ERM and reported to the TMRC. Limit breaches are addressed by ERM risk managers in conjunction with the business units, escalated as appropriate, and reviewed by the TMRC if material. In addition, we have established several action triggers that prompt immediate review by management and the implementation of a remediation plan.
Validation and Back-Testing
We perform frequent back-testing to assess the accuracy of our VaR-based model in estimating loss at the stated confidence level. This back-testing involves the comparison of estimated VaR model outputs to daily, actual profit-and-loss outcomes, or P&L, observed from daily market movements. We back-test our VaR model using “clean” P&L, which excludes non-trading revenue such as fees, commissions and NII, as well as estimated revenue from intra-day trading.
Our VaR definition of trading losses excludes items that are not specific to the price movement of the trading assets and liabilities themselves, such as fees, commissions, changes to reserves and gains or losses from intra-day activity.
We had no back-testing exceptions in the quarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018, March, 31 2018 and June 30, 2017.
The following tables present VaR and stressed
VaR associated with our trading activities for covered positions held during the quarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018, March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, and as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018, March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, as measured by our VaR methodology: A covered position is generally defined by U.S banking regulators as an on-or off-balance sheet position associated with the organization's trading activities that is free of any restrictions on its tradability, but does not include intangible assets, certain credit derivatives recognized as guarantees and certain equity positions not publicly traded.
Diversification effect in the table below represents the difference between total VaR and the sum of the VaRs for each trading activity. This effect arises because the trading activities are not perfectly correlated.
| | | TABLE 30: TEN-DAY VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES FOR COVERED POSITIONS | |
| TABLE 27: TEN-DAY VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES FOR COVERED POSITIONS | | TABLE 27: TEN-DAY VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES FOR COVERED POSITIONS | | |
| | | Quarters Ended | | As of June 30, | | As of March 31, | | As of June 30, |
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2017 | | Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 | | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of June 30, 2017 | June 30, 2018 | | March 31, 2018 | | June 30, 2017 | | 2018 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Average | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Average | | Maximum | | Minimum | | VaR | | VaR | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | VaR | | VaR | | VaR |
| Global Markets | $ | 7,592 |
| | $ | 13,703 |
| | $ | 3,295 |
| | $ | 7,759 |
| | $ | 16,160 |
| | $ | 4,590 |
| | $ | 9,524 |
| | $ | 7,577 |
| $ | 6,396 |
| | $ | 12,946 |
| | $ | 3,607 |
| | $ | 6,496 |
| | $ | 11,390 |
| | $ | 2,967 |
| | $ | 7,759 |
| | $ | 16,160 |
| | $ | 4,590 |
| | $ | 3,851 |
| | $ | 4,233 |
| | $ | 7,577 |
|
| Global Treasury | 342 |
| | 790 |
| | 145 |
| | 433 |
| | 1,408 |
| | 89 |
| | 723 |
| | 528 |
| 656 |
| | 1,813 |
| | 179 |
| | 764 |
| | 1,940 |
| | 100 |
| | 433 |
| | 1,408 |
| | 89 |
| | 257 |
| | 1,187 |
| | 528 |
|
| Diversification | | (504 | ) | | (1,710 | ) | | (203 | ) | | (640 | ) | | (1,982 | ) | | 513 |
| | (452 | ) | | (1,449 | ) | | (81 | ) | | (414 | ) | | (1,309 | ) | | (624 | ) |
| Total VaR | $ | 7,546 |
| | $ | 13,652 |
| | $ | 3,337 |
| | $ | 7,740 |
| | $ | 16,119 |
| | $ | 4,598 |
| | $ | 9,463 |
| | $ | 7,481 |
| $ | 6,548 |
| | $ | 13,049 |
| | $ | 3,583 |
| | $ | 6,620 |
| | $ | 11,348 |
| | $ | 3,580 |
| | $ | 7,740 |
| | $ | 16,119 |
| | $ | 4,598 |
| | $ | 3,694 |
| | $ | 4,111 |
| | $ | 7,481 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 31: TEN-DAY STRESSED VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES FOR COVERED POSITIONS |
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2017 | | Quarter Ended June 30, 2017 | | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of June 30, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Average | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Average | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Stressed VaR | | Stressed VaR |
| Global Markets | $ | 23,981 |
| | $ | 45,399 |
| | $ | 13,363 |
| | $ | 26,691 |
| | $ | 44,875 |
| | $ | 14,301 |
| | $ | 24,755 |
| | $ | 15,192 |
|
| Global Treasury | 5,309 |
| | 10,549 |
| | 2,584 |
| | 4,814 |
| | 12,329 |
| | 1,321 |
| | 5,150 |
| | 6,223 |
|
| Total Stressed VaR | $ | 24,382 |
| | $ | 44,364 |
| | $ | 13,887 |
| | $ | 26,934 |
| | $ | 43,754 |
| | $ | 14,646 |
| | $ | 24,362 |
| | $ | 14,943 |
|
State Street Corporation | 35
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 28: TEN-DAY STRESSED VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES FOR COVERED POSITIONS | | |
| | Quarters Ended | | As of June 30, | | As of March 31, | | As of June 30, |
| | June 30, 2018 | | March 31, 2018 | | June 30, 2017 | | 2018 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | Avg. | | Max. | | Min. | | Stressed VaR | | Stressed VaR | | Stressed VaR |
| Global Markets | $ | 38,594 |
| | $ | 54,517 |
| | $ | 21,608 |
| | $ | 34,136 |
| | $ | 56,764 |
| | $ | 20,411 |
| | $ | 26,691 |
| | $ | 44,875 |
| | $ | 14,301 |
| | $ | 26,774 |
| | $ | 45,984 |
| | $ | 15,192 |
|
| Global Treasury | 3,927 |
| | 10,137 |
| | 1,534 |
| | 4,118 |
| | 10,177 |
| | 342 |
| | 4,814 |
| | 12,329 |
| | 1,321 |
| | 3,268 |
| | 7,024 |
| | 6,223 |
|
| Diversification | (4,820 | ) | | (10,682 | ) | | (2,239 | ) | | (4,194 | ) | | (10,644 | ) | | (275 | ) | | (4,571 | ) | | (13,450 | ) | | (976 | ) | | (4,046 | ) | | (8,019 | ) | | (6,472 | ) |
| Total VaR | $ | 37,701 |
| | $ | 53,972 |
| | $ | 20,903 |
| | $ | 34,060 |
| | $ | 56,297 |
| | $ | 20,478 |
| | $ | 26,934 |
| | $ | 43,754 |
| | $ | 14,646 |
| | $ | 25,996 |
| | $ | 44,989 |
| | $ | 14,943 |
|
The three month average of our stressed VaR-based measure was approximately $24$38 million for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, compared to an average of approximately $34 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 and $27 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.
The decreaseincrease in the total stressed VaR-based measures asVaR is primarily attributed to the resumption of September 30, 2017, comparedhistorical exposure to June 30, 2017, was mainly driven by lower interest rate basis risk in emerging market currencies as of September 30, 2017 as compared to June 30, 2017.markets.
The VaR-based measures presented in the preceding tables are primarily a reflection of the overall level of market volatility and our appetite for taking market risk in our trading activities. Overall
levels of volatility have been low both on an absolute basis and relative to the historical information observed at the beginning of the period used for the calculations. Both the ten-day VaR-based measures and the stressed VaR-based measures are based on historical changes observed during rolling ten-day periods for the portfolios as of the close of business each day over the past one-year period.
We may in the future modify and adjust our models and methodologies used to calculate VaR and stressed VaR, subject to regulatory review and approval, and these modifications and adjustments may result in changes in our VaR-based and stressed VaR-based measures.
The following tables present the VaR and stressed-VaR associated with our trading activities attributable to foreign exchange risk, interest-rate risk and volatility risk as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018, March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017. The totals ofDiversification effect in the VaR-based and stressed VaR-based measures fortable below represents the three attributes in total exceeded the relateddifference between total VaR and total stressed VaR presented in the foregoing tables assum of the VaRs for each period-end, primarily due torisk category. This effect arises because the benefits of diversification across risk types.categories are not perfectly correlated.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TABLE 32: TEN-DAY VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES BY RISK FACTOR(1) |
| | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of June 30, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk |
| By component: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Markets | $ | 7,876 |
| | $ | 2,930 |
| | $ | 201 |
| | $ | 6,167 |
| | $ | 3,042 |
| | $ | 506 |
|
| Global Treasury | 62 |
| | 736 |
| | — |
| | 59 |
| | 552 |
| | — |
|
| Total VaR | $ | 7,883 |
| | $ | 2,564 |
| | $ | 201 |
| | $ | 6,186 |
| | $ | 3,035 |
| | $ | 506 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TABLE 33: TEN-DAY STRESSED VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES BY RISK FACTOR(1) |
| | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of June 30, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk |
| By component: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Markets | $ | 16,864 |
| | $ | 20,608 |
| | $ | 214 |
| | $ | 10,514 |
| | $ | 13,782 |
| | $ | 520 |
|
| Global Treasury | 98 |
| | 5,273 |
| | — |
| | 104 |
| | 6,439 |
| | — |
|
| Total Stressed VaR | $ | 16,862 |
| | $ | 21,940 |
| | $ | 214 |
| | $ | 10,570 |
| | $ | 15,036 |
| | $ | 520 |
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TABLE 29: TEN-DAY VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES BY RISK FACTOR FOR COVERED POSITIONS(1) |
| | As of June 30, 2018 | | As of March 31, 2018 | | As of June 30, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate | | Volatility Risk |
| By component: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Markets | $ | 2,386 |
| | $ | 3,114 |
| | $ | 467 |
| | $ | 2,407 |
| | $ | 3,806 |
| | $ | 243 |
| | $ | 6,167 |
| | $ | 3,042 |
| | $ | 506 |
|
| Global Treasury | 36 |
| | 228 |
| | — |
| | 62 |
| | 1,148 |
| | — |
| | 59 |
| | 552 |
| | — |
|
| Diversification | (17 | ) | | (156 | ) | | — |
| | (54 | ) | | (1,575 | ) | | — |
| | (40 | ) | | (559 | ) | | — |
|
| Total VaR | $ | 2,405 |
| | $ | 3,186 |
| | $ | 467 |
| | $ | 2,415 |
| | $ | 3,379 |
| | $ | 243 |
| | $ | 6,186 |
| | $ | 3,035 |
| | $ | 506 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
TABLE 30: TEN-DAY STRESSED VaR ASSOCIATED WITH TRADING ACTIVITIES BY RISK FACTOR FOR COVERED POSITIONS(1) |
| | As of June 30, 2018 | | As of March 31, 2018 | | As of June 30, 2017 |
| (In thousands) | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate Risk | | Volatility Risk | | Foreign Exchange Risk | | Interest Rate | | Volatility Risk |
| By component: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Global Markets | $ | 9,457 |
| | $ | 36,770 |
| | $ | 520 |
| | $ | 10,520 |
| | $ | 44,416 |
| | $ | 273 |
| | $ | 10,514 |
| | $ | 13,782 |
| | $ | 520 |
|
| Global Treasury | 130 |
| | 3,391 |
| | — |
| | 126 |
| | 7,173 |
| | — |
| | 104 |
| | 6,439 |
| | — |
|
| Diversification | 2 |
| | (4,203 | ) | | — |
| | (225 | ) | | (8,218 | ) | | — |
| | (48 | ) | | (5,185 | ) | | — |
|
| Total VaR | $ | 9,589 |
| | $ | 35,958 |
| | $ | 520 |
| | $ | 10,421 |
| | $ | 43,371 |
| | $ | 273 |
| | $ | 10,570 |
| | $ | 15,036 |
| | $ | 520 |
|
State Street Corporation | 36
Asset-and-LiabilityMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Asset and Liability Management Activities
The primary objective of asset-and-liabilityasset and liability management is to provide sustainable NII under varying economic conditions, while protecting the economic value of the assets and liabilities carried in our consolidated statement of condition from the adverse effects of changes in interest rates. While many market factors affect the level of NII and the economic value of our assets and liabilities, one of the most significant factors is our exposure to movements in interest rates. Most of our NII is earned from the investment of client deposits generated by our businesses. We invest these client deposits in assets that conform generally to the characteristics of our balance sheet liabilities, including the currency composition of our significant non-U.S. dollar denominated client liabilities.
We quantify NII sensitivity using an earnings simulation model that includes our expectations for new business growth, changes in balance sheet mix and investment portfolio positioning. This measure compares our baseline view of NII over a twelve-month horizon, based on our internal forecast of interest rates, to a wide range of instantaneous and gradual rate shocks. Economic value of equity (EVE) sensitivity is a discounted cash flow model designed to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities under a series of interest rate shocks over a long-term horizon. Each approach is routinely monitored as market conditions change and within internally-approved risk limits and guidelines.
For additional information about our Asset-and-Liability Management Activities, refer to pages 104100 to 105101 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion
State Street Corporation | 36
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
In the table below, we report the expected change in NII over the next twelve months from +/-100 bps instantaneous and gradual parallel rate shocks. Each scenario assumes no management action is taken to mitigate the adverse effects of interest rate changes on our financial performance. While investment securities balances can fluctuate with the level of rates as prepayment assumptions change, our deposit balances remain consistent with the baseline.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 31: NII SENSITIVITY |
| (In millions) | | June 30,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| Rate change: | | Benefit (Exposure) |
| +100 bps shock | | $ | 430 |
| | $ | 435 |
|
| –100 bps shock | | (254 | ) | | (294 | ) |
| +100 bps ramp | | 194 |
| | 177 |
|
| –100 bps ramp | | (130 | ) | | (122 | ) |
As of June 30, 2018, NII sensitivity remains positioned to benefit from rising interest rates. Compared to December 31, 2017, our asset sensitive
positioning to an instantaneous rise in rates is relatively unchanged. While the impacts from investment portfolio activity, including the sale of $16 billion of non-HQLA assets in the first six months of 2018, have increased our benefit from higher rates, this has largely been offset by an increase in U.S. client deposit betas as a result of higher market rates.
We also routinely measure NII sensitivity to non-parallel rate shocks to isolate the impact of short-term or long-term market rates. In the up 100 bps instantaneous shock, approximately 80% of the expected benefit stems from the short-end of the yield curve. Additionally, we quantify how much of the change is a result of shifts in U.S. and non-U.S. rates. In the up 100 bps instantaneous shock, approximately 50%50-60% of the expected benefit is driven by U.S. rates.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 34: NII SENSITIVITY |
| (In millions) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Rate change: | | Benefit (Exposure) |
| +100 bps shock | | $ | 515 |
| | $ | 585 |
|
| –100 bps shock | | (352 | ) | | (265 | ) |
| +100 bps ramp | | 198 |
| | 284 |
|
| –100 bps ramp | | (119 | ) | | (161 | ) |
As of September 30, 2017, NII sensitivity remains positioned to benefit from rising interest rates. Compared to December 31, 2016, the decreased benefit to the up 100 bps instantaneous shock is driven by a mix shift in client deposits and the repricing characteristics of other wholesale liabilities, partially offset by investment portfolio activity. The increased exposure to the down 100 bps instantaneous shock is driven by higher observed short-term interest rates relative to year-end and investment portfolio activity, partially offset by a mix shift in client deposits. Gradual rate shocks have a similar asset sensitive positioning, but are less impactful due to the severity and timing of the rate shift.
The following table highlights our economic value of equityEVE sensitivity to a +/-200 bps instantaneous rate shock, relative to spot interest rates. Management compares the change in EVE sensitivity against State Street's aggregate tier 1 and tier 2 risk-based capital, calculated in conformity with current applicable regulatory requirements. Economic value of equityEVE sensitivity is dependent on the timing of interest and principal cash flows. Also, the measure only evaluates the spot balance sheet and does not include the impact of new business assumptions.
| | | TABLE 35: EVE SENSITIVITY | |
| TABLE 32: EVE SENSITIVITY | | TABLE 32: EVE SENSITIVITY |
| (In millions) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | | June 30,
2018 | | December 31,
2017 |
| Rate change: | | Benefit (Exposure) | | Benefit (Exposure) |
| +200 bps shock | | $ | (924 | ) | | $ | (1,092 | ) | | $ | (1,735 | ) | | $ | (1,507 | ) |
| –200 bps shock | | 118 |
| | 877 |
| | 1,246 |
| | 11 |
|
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, economic value of equity2018, EVE sensitivity remains exposed to upward shifts in interest rates. Compared to December 31, 2017, the change in the up 200 bps instantaneous shocks was driven by higher US interest rates. The change in each scenariothe down 200 bps instantaneous shock was primarily drivendue to a modeling enhancement for negative rate currencies. The modeling enhancement allows for interest rate shocks to go below zero for certain currencies, such as Euro, where central banks have allowed negative rates. The December 31, 2017 benefit, which does not reflect the modeling enhancement, in the down 200 bps shock would have increased by investment portfolio repositioningapproximately $1 billion under the new modeling approach.
This update aligns our modeling approaches for negative rates in both EVE and the mix of client deposits. The -200 bps scenario is also impacted by the low level of interest rates, which limits the size of the rate shock.NII sensitivity simulations.
Model Risk Management
The use of quantitative models is widespread throughout the financial services industry, with large and complex organizations relying on sophisticated models to support numerous aspects of their financial decision making. The models contemporaneously represent
State Street Corporation | 37
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
both a significant advancement in financial management and a new source of risk. In large banking organizations like State Street, model results influence business decisions, and model failure could have a harmful effect on our financial performance. As a result, the Model Risk Management Framework seeks to mitigate model risk at State Street.
For additional information about our model risk management, including our governance and model validation, refer to pages 105101 to 106102 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Strategic Risk Management
We define strategic risk as the current or prospective impact on earnings or capital arising from adverse business decisions, improper implementation of strategic initiatives, or lack of responsiveness to industry-wide changes. Strategic risks are influenced by changes in the competitive environment; decline in market performance or changes in our business activities; and the potential secondary impacts of reputational risks, not already captured as market, interest rate, credit, operational, model or liquidity risks. We incorporate strategic risk into our assessment of our business plans and risk and capital management processes. Active management of strategic risk is an integral component of all aspects of our business.
For additional information about our strategic risk management, refer to page 102 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 2017 Form 10-K.
Capital
Managing our capital involves evaluating whether our actual and projected levels of capital are commensurate with our risk profile, are in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements and are sufficient to provide us with the financial flexibility to undertake future strategic business initiatives. We assess capital adequacy based on relevant regulatory capital requirements, as well as our own internal capital goals, targets and other relevant metrics.
State Street Corporation | 37
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We have a hierarchical structure supporting appropriate committee review of relevant risk and capital information. The ongoing responsibility for capital management rests with our Treasurer. The Capital ManagementPlanning group within Global Treasury is responsible for the Capital Policy and guidelines, capital forecasting,Guidelines, development of the Capital Plan, the management of global capital, capital optimization and net investment hedging.business unit capital management. The Capital ManagementPlanning group is also responsible for enterprise stress testing, including stress revenue and expense modeling and information
technology related matters associated with stress testing models.
MRAC provides oversight of our capital management, our capital adequacy, our internal targets and the expectations of the major independent credit rating agencies. In addition, MRAC approves our balance sheet strategy and related activities. The Board’s RC assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the assessment and management of risk and capital. Our Capital Policy is reviewed and approved at least annually by the Board's RC.
For additional information about our capital, refer to pages 107102 to 117112 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
State Street Corporation | 38
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Global Systemically Important Bank
We are one among a group of 30 institutions worldwide that have been identified by the FSB and the BCBS as G-SIBs. Our designation as a G-SIB is based on a number of factors, as evaluated by banking regulators, and requires us to maintain an additional capital buffer above the minimum capital ratios set forth in the Basel III final rule minimum CET1 capital ratio of 4.5%, based on a number of factors, as evaluated by banking regulators.rule.
In addition to the U.S. Basel III final rule, the Dodd-Frank Act requireswe are subject to the Federal Reserve to establish more stringent capital requirements for large bank holding companies, including State Street. On August 14, 2015, the Federal Reserve published aReserve's final rule on the implementation of capital requirements that imposeimposing a capital surcharge on U.S. G-SIBs. The surcharge requirements within the final rule began to phase-in onin January 1, 2016 and will be fully effective on January 1, 2019. The eight U.S. banks deemed to be G-SIBs, including State Street, are required to calculate the G-SIB surcharge according to two methods, and be bound by the higher of the two:
Method 1: Assesses systemic importance based upon twelve indicators across:five equally-weighted components: size, interconnectedness, complexity, cross-jurisdictional activity and substitutability
Method 2: Alters the calculation from Method 1 by factoring in a wholesale funding score in place of substitutability and applying a coefficient2x multiplier to the nine systemic indicators across size, interconnectedness, complexity and cross jurisdictional activity
As partsum of the final rule, the Federal Reserve published estimated G-SIB surcharges for the eight U.S. G-SIBs based on relevant data from 2012 to 2014. five components
Method 2 is identified as the binding methodology for State Streetus and theour applicable surcharge on January 1, 2017 wasis presently calculated to be 1.5%. Assuming completion of the phase-in period for the capital conservation buffer, and a countercyclical buffer of 0%, the minimum capital ratios as of January 1, 2019, including a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%, and a G-SIB surcharge of 1.5% in 2019, the minimum fully phased-in capital ratios State Street would be required to have as of January 1, 2019 are: 8.5% for CET1 Capital,capital, 10.0% for tier 1 risk-based capital and 12.0% for total risk-based capital, in order for us to make capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments without limitation. Further, like all other U.S. G-SIBs, we are also subject to a 2% leverage buffer under the Basel III final rule. If we fail to exceed the 2% leverage buffer, it will be subject to increased restrictions
State Street Corporation | 38
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(depending upon the extent of the shortfall) regarding capital distributions and discretionary executive bonus payments.
Not all of our banking competitors have similarly been designated as systemically important nor are all of them subject to the same degree of regulation as a bank or financial holding company, and therefore some of our competitors may not be subject to the same additional capital and leverage requirements. In addition, not all our competitors are banking institutions and therefore are not subject to the same degree of regulation as is applicable to banking institutions, such as State Street, including the capital leverage requirements described above.
Total Loss AbsorbingLoss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC)
OnIn December 15, 2016, the Federal Reserve released its final rule on TLAC, LTD and clean holding company requirements for U.S. domiciled G-SIBs, such as State Street, that are intended to improve the resiliency and resolvability of certain U.S. banking organizations through new enhanced prudential standards. The TLAC final rule imposes: (1) TLAC requirements (i.e., combined eligible tier 1 regulatory capital and eligible LTD); (2) separate eligible LTD requirements; and (3) clean holding company requirements designed to make short-term unsecured debt (including deposits) and most other ineligible liabilities structurally senior to eligible LTD.
Among other things, the TLAC final rule requires State Streetus to comply with minimum requirements for external TLAC and external LTD plus an external TLAC buffer.effective January 1, 2019. Specifically, State Streetwe must hold (1) combined eligible tier 1 regulatory capital and eligible LTD in the amount equal to at least 21.5% of total risk-weighted assets (using an estimated G-SIB method 1 surcharge of 1%) and 9.5% (7.5% SLR plus eSLR buffer of 2%) of total leverage exposure, as defined by the SLR final rule, and (2) qualifying external LTD equal to the greater of 7.5% of risk-weighted assets (using an estimated G-SIB method 2 surcharge of 1.5%) and 4.5% of total leverage exposure, as defined by the SLR final rule.
In forecasting our compliance with these requirements, we presently include our junior subordinated debentures maturing in 2028 and 2047 as TLAC and LTD eligible debt. Based upon current estimates, assumptions and guidance, we project that compliance with TLAC and LTD will result in increasing our outstanding long-term debtLTD by approximately $2$1.5 billion at December 31, 2018 compared to the TLAC eligible debt outstanding at September 30,December 31, 2017.
On April 5, 2018, the Federal Reserve released a notice of proposed rulemaking which may impact the amount of TLAC and LTD State Street will be required to hold. In addition, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act may also impact our TLAC and LTD requirements as the definition of the supplementary leverage ratio has been modified for custodial banks. Our estimates are subject to updates based on the changing regulatory landscape and additional regulatory guidance and interpretation.
For additional information on our TLAC requirements, refer to page 7 under "Regulatory Capital Adequacy and Liquidity Standards" in "Total Loss-Absorbing Capacity (TLAC)" included under Item 1, Business, in our 20162017 Form 10-K10-K.
State Street must comply with the TLAC final rule starting on January 1, 2019.
State Street Corporation | 39
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Regulatory Capital
We and State Street Bank, as advanced approaches banking organizations, are subject to the current Basel III minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratio guidelines. The Basel III final rule incorporates several multi-year transition provisions for capital components and minimum ratio requirements for CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital. The transition period startedframework in January 2014 and will be completed by January 1, 2019, which is concurrent with the full implementationU.S. Provisions of the Basel III final rule that became effective under a transition timetable starting in January 2014, with full implementation required by January 1, 2019. We are also subject to the U.S.
Among other things, the Basel III final market risk capital rule introduced a minimum CET1 risk-based capital ratioissued by U.S. banking regulators effective as of 4.5% and raises the minimum tier 1 risk-based capital ratio from 4% to 6%. In addition, for advanced approaches banking organizations such as State Street, the Basel III final rule imposes a minimum supplementary tier 1 leverage ratio of 3%, the numerator of which is tier 1 capital and the denominator of which includes both on-balance sheet assets and certain off-balance sheet exposures.January 2013.
The Basel III final rule provides for two frameworks for monitoring capital adequacy: the “standardized” approach and the “advanced” approaches, applicable to advanced approaches banking organizations, like us. The standardized approach prescribes standardized calculations for RWA, including specified risk weights for certain on- and off-balance sheet exposures.
The advanced approaches consist of the AIRB approach used for the calculation of RWA related to credit risk, and the AMA approach used for the calculation of RWA related to operational risk. RWA related to market risk continues to be calculated in conformity with the final market risk capital rule described below.
The final market risk capital rule requires us to use internal models to calculate daily measures of Value-at-Risk, referred to as VaR, that reflect general market risk for certain of our trading positions defined by the rule as “covered positions,” as well as stressed-VaR measures to supplement the VaR measures. The rule also introducedrequires a public disclosure composed of qualitative and quantitative information about the market risk associated with our trading activities and our related VaR and stressed-VaR measures. The qualitative and quantitative information required by the rule is provided under "Market Risk" in this Form 10-Q.
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we and State Street Bank, as advanced approaches banking organizations, are subject to a permanent "capital floor," also referred to as the Collins Amendment, in the assessment of our regulatory capital adequacy, including the capital conservation buffer and a countercyclical capital buffer that add to the minimumbuffer. Our risk-based capital ratios.ratios for regulatory assessment purposes are the lower of each ratio calculated under the standardized approach and the advanced approaches.
The requirement for the capital conservation buffer is being phased in beginning on January 1, 2016, with full implementation by January 1, 2019. Specifically, the final rule limits a banking organization’s ability to make capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers if it fails to maintain a common equity tier 1CET1 capital
State Street Corporation | 39
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
conservation buffer of more than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets and, if deployed during periods of excessive credit growth, a common equity tier 1CET1 countercyclical capital buffer of up to 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets, above each of the minimum common equity tier 1, andCET1, tier 1, and total risk-based capital ratios. The countercyclical capital buffer is currently set at zero by U.S. banking regulators.
To maintain the status of ourthe Parent Company as a financial holding company, we and our insured depository institution subsidiaries are required to be “well-capitalized”
“well-capitalized” by maintaining capital ratios above the minimum requirements. Effective on January 1, 2015, the “well-capitalized” standard for our banking subsidiaries was revised to reflect the higher capital requirements in the Basel III final rule.
Under the Basel III final rule, certain new items are deducted from CET1 capital and certain regulatory capital deductions were modified as compared to the previously applicable capital regulations. Among other things, the final rule requires significant investments in the common stock of unconsolidated financial institutions, as defined, and certain deferred tax assets that exceed specified individual and aggregate thresholds to be deducted from common equity tier 1 capital. As an advanced approaches banking organization, after-tax unrealized
gains and losses on AFS investment securities flow through to and affect State Street’s and State Street Bank's CET1 capital, subject to a phase-in schedule.
We are required to use the advanced approaches framework as provided in the Basel III final rule to determine our risk-based capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act applies a "capital floor" to advanced approaches banking organizations, such asState Street and State Street Bank. We are subject to the more stringent of the risk-based capital ratios calculated under the standardized approach and those calculated under the advanced approaches in the assessment of our capital adequacy under the PCA framework.
State Street Corporation | 40
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth the transition to full implementation and the minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements under the Basel III final rule. This does not include the potential imposition of an additional countercyclical capital buffer.
| | TABLE 36: BASEL III FINAL RULES TRANSITION ARRANGEMENTS AND MINIMUM RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIOS(1) | |
TABLE 33: BASEL III FINAL RULES TRANSITION ARRANGEMENTS AND MINIMUM RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIOS(1) | | TABLE 33: BASEL III FINAL RULES TRANSITION ARRANGEMENTS AND MINIMUM RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIOS(1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 |
| Capital conservation buffer (CET1) | | — | % | | 0.625 | % | | 1.250 | % | | 1.875 | % | | 2.500 | % | | — | % | | 0.625 | % | | 1.250 | % | | 1.875 | % | | 2.500 | % |
G-SIB surcharge (CET1)(2) | | — |
| | 0.375 |
| | 0.750 |
| | 1.125 |
| | 1.500 |
| | — |
| | 0.375 |
| | 0.750 |
| | 1.125 |
| | 1.500 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minimum common equity tier 1(3) | | 4.500 |
| | 5.500 |
| | 6.500 |
| | 7.500 |
| | 8.500 |
| |
Minimum CET1(3) | | | 4.500 |
| | 5.500 |
| | 6.500 |
| | 7.500 |
| | 8.500 |
|
Minimum tier 1 capital(3) | | 6.000 |
| | 7.000 |
| | 8.000 |
| | 9.000 |
| | 10.000 |
| | 6.000 |
| | 7.000 |
| | 8.000 |
| | 9.000 |
| | 10.000 |
|
Minimum total capital(3) | | 8.000 |
| | 9.000 |
| | 10.000 |
| | 11.000 |
| | 12.000 |
| | 8.000 |
| | 9.000 |
| | 10.000 |
| | 11.000 |
| | 12.000 |
|
(1) Minimum ratios shown above do not reflect the countercyclical buffer, currently set at zero by U.S. banking regulators.
(2) As part of the G-SIB Surcharge final rule, the Federal Reserve published estimated G-SIB surcharges for the eight U.S. G-SIBs based on relevant data from 2012-2014 and the estimated resulting G-SIB surcharge for State Street is 1.5%. Including the 1.5% surcharge, State Street's minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements, as of January 1, 2019 would be 8.5% for CET1, 10.0% for tier 1 capital and 12.0% for total capital.
(3) Minimum CET1 capital, minimum tier 1 capital and minimum total capital presented include the transitional capital conservation buffer as well as the estimated transitional G-SIB surcharge being phased-in beginning January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2019 based on an estimated 1.5% surcharge in all periods.
The specific calculation of State Street's and State Street Bank's risk-based capital ratios will changehas changed as the provisions of the Basel III final rule related to the numerator (capital) and denominator (risk-weighted assets) arewere phased in, and as our risk-weighted assets calculated using the advanced approaches changechanged due to potential changes in methodology. These ongoing methodological changes will result in differences in our reported capital ratios from one reporting period to the next that are independent of applicable changes to our capital base, our asset composition, our off-balance sheet exposures or our risk profile.
The following table presents the regulatory capital structure and related regulatory capital ratios for State Street and State Street Bank as of the dates indicated. We are subject to the more stringent of the risk-based capital ratios calculated under the standardized approach and those calculated under the advanced approaches in the assessment of our capital adequacy under applicable bank regulatory standards.
As a result of changes in the methodologies used to calculate our regulatory capital ratios from period to period, as the provisions of the Basel III final rule are phased in, the ratios presented in the table for each period are not directly comparable. Refer to the footnotes following the table.
State Street Corporation | 4140
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | TABLE 37: REGULATORY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS | |
| TABLE 34: REGULATORY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS | | TABLE 34: REGULATORY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS |
| | | State Street | | State Street Bank | | State Street | | State Street Bank |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | Basel III Advanced Approaches September 30, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach September 30, 2017(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2016(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2016(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches September 30, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach September 30, 2017(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2016(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2016(2) | (In millions) | Basel III Advanced Approaches June 30, 2018(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach June 30, 2018(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2017(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches June 30, 2018(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach June 30, 2018(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2017(2) |
| Common shareholders' equity: | Common shareholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common shareholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock and related surplus | Common stock and related surplus | $ | 10,307 |
| | $ | 10,307 |
| | $ | 10,286 |
| | $ | 10,286 |
| | $ | 11,382 |
| | $ | 11,382 |
| | $ | 11,376 |
| | $ | 11,376 |
| Common stock and related surplus | $ | 10,324 |
| | $ | 10,324 |
| | $ | 10,302 |
| | $ | 10,302 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
|
| Retained earnings | Retained earnings | 18,675 |
| | 18,675 |
| | 17,459 |
| | 17,459 |
| | 12,286 |
| | 12,286 |
| | 12,285 |
| | 12,285 |
| Retained earnings | 19,856 |
| | 19,856 |
| | 18,856 |
| | 18,856 |
| | 13,189 |
| | 13,189 |
| | 12,312 |
| | 12,312 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (985 | ) | | (985 | ) | | (1,936 | ) | | (1,936 | ) | | (808 | ) | | (808 | ) | | (1,648 | ) | | (1,648 | ) | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1,446 | ) | | (1,446 | ) | | (972 | ) | | (972 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | | (809 | ) | | (809 | ) |
| Treasury stock, at cost | Treasury stock, at cost | (8,697 | ) | | (8,697 | ) | | (7,682 | ) | | (7,682 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Treasury stock, at cost | (9,317 | ) | | (9,317 | ) | | (9,029 | ) | | (9,029 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | Total | 19,300 |
| | 19,300 |
| | 18,127 |
| | 18,127 |
| | 22,860 |
| | 22,860 |
| | 22,013 |
| | 22,013 |
| Total | 19,417 |
| | 19,417 |
| | 19,157 |
| | 19,157 |
| | 23,550 |
| | 23,550 |
| | 23,115 |
| | 23,115 |
|
| Regulatory capital adjustments: | Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | (6,739 | ) | | (6,739 | ) | | (6,348 | ) | | (6,348 | ) | | (6,447 | ) | | (6,447 | ) | | (6,060 | ) | | (6,060 | ) | Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | (7,008 | ) | | (7,008 | ) | | (6,877 | ) | | (6,877 | ) | | (6,711 | ) | | (6,711 | ) | | (6,579 | ) | | (6,579 | ) |
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | (122 | ) | | (122 | ) | | (155 | ) | | (155 | ) | | (90 | ) | | (90 | ) | | (148 | ) | | (148 | ) | Other adjustments | (186 | ) | | (186 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (44 | ) | | (44 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 12,439 |
| | 12,439 |
| | 11,624 |
| | 11,624 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 15,805 |
| | 15,805 |
| |
| CET1 capital | | CET1 capital | 12,223 |
| | 12,223 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,531 |
| | 16,531 |
|
| Preferred stock | Preferred stock | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Preferred stock | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | (29 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (103 | ) | | (103 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tier 1 capital | Tier 1 capital | 15,606 |
| | 15,606 |
| | 14,717 |
| | 14,717 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 15,805 |
| | 15,805 |
| Tier 1 capital | 15,419 |
| | 15,419 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,531 |
| | 16,531 |
|
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | 1,072 |
| | 1,072 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,179 |
| | 1,179 |
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | 765 |
| | 765 |
| | 980 |
| | 980 |
| | 765 |
| | 765 |
| | 983 |
| | 983 |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| ALLL and other | ALLL and other | 5 |
| | 79 |
| | 19 |
| | 77 |
| | — |
| | 79 |
| | 15 |
| | 77 |
| ALLL and other | — |
| | 73 |
| | 4 |
| | 72 |
| | — |
| | 73 |
| | — |
| | 72 |
|
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other adjustments | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total capital | Total capital | $ | 16,684 |
| | $ | 16,758 |
| | $ | 15,909 |
| | $ | 15,967 |
| | $ | 17,399 |
| | $ | 17,478 |
| | $ | 16,999 |
| | $ | 17,061 |
| Total capital | $ | 16,184 |
| | $ | 16,257 |
| | $ | 16,367 |
| | $ | 16,435 |
| | $ | 17,560 |
| | $ | 17,633 |
| | $ | 17,514 |
| | $ | 17,586 |
|
| Risk-weighted assets: | Risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Credit risk | Credit risk | $ | 50,197 |
| | $ | 106,377 |
| | $ | 50,900 |
| | $ | 98,125 |
| | $ | 47,282 |
| | $ | 103,024 |
| | $ | 47,383 |
| | $ | 94,413 |
| Credit risk | $ | 48,308 |
| | $ | 106,063 |
| | $ | 49,976 |
| | $ | 101,349 |
| | $ | 45,689 |
| | $ | 103,156 |
| | $ | 47,448 |
| | $ | 98,433 |
|
Operational risk(4) | Operational risk(4) | 45,795 |
| | NA |
| | 44,579 |
| | NA |
| | 45,270 |
| | NA |
| | 44,043 |
| | NA |
| Operational risk(4) | 45,991 |
| | NA |
| | 45,822 |
| | NA |
| | 45,423 |
| | NA |
| | 45,295 |
| | NA |
|
Market risk(5) | Market risk(5) | 3,005 |
| | 1,203 |
| | 3,822 |
| | 1,751 |
| | 3,005 |
| | 1,203 |
| | 3,822 |
| | 1,751 |
| Market risk(5) | 4,203 |
| | 1,677 |
| | 3,358 |
| | 1,334 |
| | 4,205 |
| | 1,677 |
| | 3,375 |
| | 1,334 |
|
| Total risk-weighted assets | Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 98,997 |
| | $ | 107,580 |
| | $ | 99,301 |
| | $ | 99,876 |
| | $ | 95,557 |
| | $ | 104,227 |
| | $ | 95,248 |
| | $ | 96,164 |
| Total risk-weighted assets | $ | 98,502 |
| | $ | 107,740 |
| | $ | 99,156 |
| | $ | 102,683 |
| | $ | 95,317 |
| | $ | 104,833 |
| | $ | 96,118 |
| | $ | 99,767 |
|
| Adjusted quarterly average assets | Adjusted quarterly average assets | $ | 211,396 |
| | $ | 211,396 |
| | $ | 226,310 |
| | $ | 226,310 |
| | $ | 208,308 |
| | $ | 208,308 |
| | $ | 222,584 |
| | $ | 222,584 |
| Adjusted quarterly average assets | $ | 216,896 |
| | $ | 216,896 |
| | $ | 209,328 |
| | $ | 209,328 |
| | $ | 214,670 |
| | $ | 214,670 |
| | $ | 206,070 |
| | $ | 206,070 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital Ratios(1): | 2017 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(6) | 2016 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(6) | 2017 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 6.5 | % | 5.5 | % | 12.6 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 11.7 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 17.1 | % | | 15.7 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 16.4 | % | |
| CET1 capital | | 7.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 12.4 | % | | 11.3 | % | | 12.3 | % | | 11.9 | % | | 17.6 | % | | 16.0 | % | | 17.2 | % | | 16.6 | % |
| Tier 1 capital | 8.0 |
| 7.0 |
| 15.8 |
| | 14.5 |
| | 14.8 |
| | 14.7 |
| | 17.1 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 16.6 |
| | 16.4 |
| 9.0 |
| 8.0 |
| 15.7 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 15.5 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 16.6 |
|
| Total capital | 10.0 |
| 9.0 |
| 16.9 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 18.2 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 17.8 |
| | 17.7 |
| 11.0 |
| 10.0 |
| 16.4 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 18.4 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 18.2 |
| | 17.6 |
|
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.0 |
| 4.0 |
| 7.4 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 7.1 |
| 4.0 |
| 4.0 |
| 7.1 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 8.0 |
| | 8.0 |
|
(1) CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital ratios as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the advanced approaches provisions of the Basel III final rule. Tier 1 leverage ratio as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(2) CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital ratios as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the standardized approach provisions of the Basel III final rule. Tier 1 leverage ratio as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(3) Amounts for State Street and State Street Bank as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 consisted of goodwill, net of associated deferred tax liabilities, and 80%100% of other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities. Amounts for State Street and State Street Bank as of December 31, 20162017 consisted of goodwill, net of deferred tax liabilities and 60%80% of other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities. Intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities is phased in as a deduction from capital, in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(4) Under the current advanced approaches rules and regulatory guidance concerning operational risk models, RWA attributable to operational risk can vary substantially from period-to-period, without direct correlation to the effects of a particular loss event on our results of operations and financial condition and impacting dates and periods that may differ from the dates and periods as of and during which the loss event is reflected in our financial statements, with the timing and categorization dependent on the processes for model updates and, if applicable, model revalidation and regulatory review and related supervisory processes. An individual loss event can have a significant effect on the output of our operational risk RWA under the advanced approaches depending on the severity of the loss event and its categorization among the seven Basel-defined UOMs.
(5) Market risk risk-weighted assets reported in conformity with the Basel III advanced approaches included a CVA which reflected the risk of potential fair value adjustments for credit risk reflected in our valuation of over-the-counter derivative contracts. The CVA was not provided for in the final market risk capital rule; however, it was required by the advanced approaches provisions of the Basel III final rule. We used a simple CVA approach in conformity with the Basel III advanced approaches.
(6) Minimum requirements will be phased in up to full implementation beginning on January 1, 2019; minimum requirements listed are as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018. See Table 36:33: Basel III Final Rules Transition Arrangements and Minimum Risk BasedRisk-Based Capital Ratios.
(7) Minimum requirements will be phased in up to full implementation beginning on January 1, 2019; minimum requirements listed are as of December 31, 2016.2017. See Table 36:33: Basel III Final Rules Transition Arrangements and Minimum Risk BasedRisk-Based Capital Ratios.
NA Not applicable
State Street Corporation | 4241
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As of January 1, 2015, we used the standardized provisions of the Basel III final rule in addition to the advanced approaches provisions which were previously implemented in the second quarter of 2014, and the lower of our regulatory capital ratios calculated under the advanced approaches and those ratios calculated under the standardized approach are applied in the assessment of our capital adequacy for regulatory capital purposes. Beginning in the second quarter of 2014, until January 1, 2015, we used the advanced approaches provisions in the Basel III final rule, and transitional provisions of the Basel III final rule, and the lower of our regulatory capital ratios calculated under the advanced approaches and those ratios calculated under the transitional provisions were applied in the assessment of our capital adequacy for regulatory capital purposes.
Our CET1 capital increased $815$19 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 compared to December 31, 20162017 primarily due toby the net income of $1.81$1.4 billion and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $951 million. The increases in CET1 capital were partiallyfor the six months ended June 30, 2018, offset by capital distributions of $1.69 billion$748 million from common stock purchases and common and preferred stock dividends, and thea $297 million impact from the 20172018 phase-in of the deduction of intangibles (80%(100% in 20172018 compared to 60%80% in 2016). 2017) and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $474 million.
In the same comparative period, our tier 1 capital increased $889$37 million due to the increase in CET1 capital. Totaland total capital increased $775decreased $183 million under advanced approaches and increased $791decreased $178 million under standardized approach due to the changes to tier 1in the CET1 capital. State Street Bank's tier 1 capital increased $518 million, and total capital increased $400 million and $417 million under the advanced and standardized approaches, respectively, as of September 30, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016. The increase is a result of higher CET1.
The table below presents a roll-forward of CTE1CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 38: CAPITAL ROLL-FORWARD |
| | State Street |
| (In millions) | Basel III Advanced Approaches September 30, 2017 | Basel III Standardized Approach September 30, 2017 | Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2016 | Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2016 |
| Common equity tier 1 capital: | | | |
| Common equity tier 1 capital balance, beginning of period | $ | 11,624 |
| $ | 11,624 |
| $ | 12,433 |
| $ | 12,433 |
|
| Net income | 1,807 |
| 1,807 |
| 2,143 |
| 2,143 |
|
| Changes in treasury stock, at cost | (1,015 | ) | (1,015 | ) | (1,225 | ) | (1,225 | ) |
| Dividends declared | (588 | ) | (588 | ) | (732 | ) | (732 | ) |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities | (391 | ) | (391 | ) | (421 | ) | (421 | ) |
| Effect of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 951 |
| 951 |
| (514 | ) | (514 | ) |
| Other adjustments | 51 |
| 51 |
| (60 | ) | (60 | ) |
| Changes in common equity tier 1 capital | 815 |
| 815 |
| (809 | ) | (809 | ) |
| Common equity tier 1 capital balance, end of period | 12,439 |
| 12,439 |
| 11,624 |
| 11,624 |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital: | | | |
| Tier 1 capital balance, beginning of period | 14,717 |
| 14,717 |
| 15,264 |
| 15,264 |
|
| Change in common equity tier 1 capital | 815 |
| 815 |
| (809 | ) | (809 | ) |
| Net issuance of preferred stock | — |
| — |
| 493 |
| 493 |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | — |
| — |
| (237 | ) | (237 | ) |
| Other adjustments | 74 |
| 74 |
| 6 |
| 6 |
|
| Changes in tier 1 capital | 889 |
| 889 |
| (547 | ) | (547 | ) |
| Tier 1 capital balance, end of period | 15,606 |
| 15,606 |
| 14,717 |
| 14,717 |
|
| Tier 2 capital: | | | | |
| Tier 2 capital balance, beginning of period | 1,192 |
| 1,250 |
| 2,085 |
| 2,139 |
|
Net issuance and changes in long-term debt qualifying as tier 2 | (100 | ) | (100 | ) | (186 | ) | (186 | ) |
| Trust preferred capital securities phased into tier 2 capital | — |
| — |
| (713 | ) | (713 | ) |
| Changes in ALLL and other | (14 | ) | 2 |
| 7 |
| 11 |
|
| Change in other adjustments | — |
| — |
| (1 | ) | (1 | ) |
| Changes in tier 2 capital | (114 | ) | (98 | ) | (893 | ) | (889 | ) |
| Tier 2 capital balance, end of period | 1,078 |
| 1,152 |
| 1,192 |
| 1,250 |
|
| Total capital: | | | | |
| Total capital balance, beginning of period | 15,909 |
| 15,967 |
| 17,349 |
| 17,403 |
|
| Changes in tier 1 capital | 889 |
| 889 |
| (547 | ) | (547 | ) |
| Changes in tier 2 capital | (114 | ) | (98 | ) | (893 | ) | (889 | ) |
| Total capital balance, end of period | $ | 16,684 |
| $ | 16,758 |
| $ | 15,909 |
| $ | 15,967 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 35: CAPITAL ROLL-FORWARD |
| | | State Street |
| (In millions) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches June 30, 2018 | | Basel III Standardized Approach June 30, 2018 | | Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2017 | | Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2017 |
| CET1 capital: | | | | | | | | |
| CET1 capital balance, beginning of period | | $ | 12,204 |
| | $ | 12,204 |
| | $ | 11,624 |
| | $ | 11,624 |
|
| Net income | | 1,395 |
| | 1,395 |
| | 2,177 |
| | 2,177 |
|
| Changes in treasury stock, at cost | | (288 | ) | | (288 | ) | | (1,347 | ) | | (1,347 | ) |
| Dividends declared | | (398 | ) | | (398 | ) | | (778 | ) | | (778 | ) |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities | | (131 | ) | | (131 | ) | | (529 | ) | | (529 | ) |
| Effect of certain items in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | (474 | ) | | (474 | ) | | 964 |
| | 964 |
|
| Other adjustments | | (85 | ) | | (85 | ) | | 93 |
| | 93 |
|
| Changes in CET1 capital | | 19 |
| | 19 |
| | 580 |
| | 580 |
|
| CET1 capital balance, end of period | | 12,223 |
| | 12,223 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 12,204 |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital: | | | | | | | | |
| Tier 1 capital balance, beginning of period | | 15,382 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 14,717 |
| | 14,717 |
|
| Change in CET1 capital | | 19 |
| | 19 |
| | 580 |
| | 580 |
|
| Net issuance of preferred stock | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other adjustments | | 18 |
| | 18 |
| | 85 |
| | 85 |
|
| Changes in tier 1 capital | | 37 |
| | 37 |
| | 665 |
| | 665 |
|
| Tier 1 capital balance, end of period | | 15,419 |
| | 15,419 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 15,382 |
|
| Tier 2 capital: | | | | | | | | |
| Tier 2 capital balance, beginning of period | | 985 |
| | 1,053 |
| | 1,192 |
| | 1,250 |
|
| Net issuance and changes in long-term debt qualifying as tier 2 | | (215 | ) | | (215 | ) | | (192 | ) | | (192 | ) |
| Changes in ALLL and other | | (4 | ) | | 1 |
| | (15 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Change in other adjustments | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Changes in tier 2 capital | | (220 | ) | | (215 | ) | | (207 | ) | | (197 | ) |
| Tier 2 capital balance, end of period | | 765 |
| | 838 |
| | 985 |
| | 1,053 |
|
| Total capital: | | | | | | | | |
| Total capital balance, beginning of period | | 16,367 |
| | 16,435 |
| | 15,909 |
| | 15,967 |
|
| Changes in tier 1 capital | | 37 |
| | 37 |
| | 665 |
| | 665 |
|
| Changes in tier 2 capital | | (220 | ) | | (215 | ) | | (207 | ) | | (197 | ) |
| Total capital balance, end of period | | $ | 16,184 |
| | $ | 16,257 |
| | $ | 16,367 |
| | $ | 16,435 |
|
State Street Corporation | 4342
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents a roll-forward of the Basel III advanced approaches risk-weighted assets for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
| | | TABLE 39: ADVANCED APPROACHES RWA ROLL-FORWARD | |
| TABLE 36: ADVANCED APPROACHES RWA ROLL-FORWARD | | TABLE 36: ADVANCED APPROACHES RWA ROLL-FORWARD |
| | | State Street | | State Street |
| (In millions) | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Total risk-weighted assets, beginning of period | | $ | 99,301 |
| | $ | 99,552 |
| | $ | 99,156 |
| | $ | 99,301 |
|
| Changes in credit risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Net increase (decrease) in investment securities-wholesale | | 1,477 |
| | (1,027 | ) | | (453 | ) | | 2,914 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in loans and leases | | 1,432 |
| | 575 |
| | 245 |
| | 30 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in securitization exposures | | (250 | ) | | (3,246 | ) | | (2,787 | ) | | (683 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in repo-style transaction exposures | | 298 |
| | 606 |
| | (384 | ) | | 440 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in OTC derivatives exposures | | (2,194 | ) | | 1,812 |
| | 535 |
| | (1,082 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in all other(1) | | (1,466 | ) | | 447 |
| | 1,176 |
| | (2,543 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in credit risk-weighted assets | | (703 | ) | | (833 | ) | | (1,668 | ) | | (924 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in credit valuation adjustment | | (269 | ) | | 512 |
| | 502 |
| | (47 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in market risk-weighted assets | | (548 | ) | | (627 | ) | | 343 |
| | (417 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in operational risk-weighted assets | | 1,216 |
| | 697 |
| | 169 |
| | 1,243 |
|
| Total risk-weighted assets, end of period | | $ | 98,997 |
| | $ | 99,301 |
| | $ | 98,502 |
| | $ | 99,156 |
|
(1) Includes assets not in a definable category, cleared transactions, non-material portfolio, other wholesale, cash and due from, and interest-bearing deposits with banks, equity exposures, and 6% credit risk supervisory charge.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, total advanced approaches risk-weighted assets decreased $304$654 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly2017, primarily due to a decrease inlower credit risk and market risk, partially offset by an increaseincreases in the credit valuation adjustment, market risk and operational risk. The decrease in credit risk was mainlyprimarily due to lower volatilitythe sale of $16 billion of non-HQLA assets within the investment portfolio in ourthe first six months of 2018, partially offset by increases in other exposures and the FX derivative portfolio leading to a lower positive marked-to-market, offset by an increase in leveraged loans stemming from a new LGD model being introduced. Market risk reduction of $548 million resulted from a lower stressed VaR. The decrease in credit valuation adjustment was also driven by the lower marked-to-market in our FX derivative portfolios. Operational risk increased approximately $1.22 billion due to a recalibration of the Operational Risk Advanced Measurement Approach Capital model.
As of December 31, 2016, total advanced approaches risk-weighted assets decreased $251 million comparedhigher mark to December 31, 2015, mainly duemarket, volumes and counterparty mix shift from banks to a decrease in credit risk and market risk, partially offset by an increase in operational risk and credit valuation adjustment. The decrease in credit risk was mainly due to a decrease in securitization exposures
as a result of sell-offs and maturities as well as calls of agency debt securities within our wholesale investment portfolio, partially offset by an increase in derivatives exposure from marked-to-market FX contracts stemming from a stronger dollar and an increase in securities finance agency lending. The market risk decrease was a result of reduced end of day positions in FX and interest rate risk. Operational risk increased approximately $700 million mainly due to an increase in loss event frequency.corporates. The increase in credit valuation adjustment was driven by anprimarily due to strengthening of the US dollar resulting in a higher mark to market in our FX derivative portfolio and a counterparty mix shift from banks to corporates. The increase in market risk was primarily due to higher interest rate risk over the market valuation FX contracts.first six months of 2018, leading to higher average stressed VaR measures. Operational risk increased due to changes in the average five-year internal loss frequency.
The following table presents a roll-forward of the Basel III standardized approach risk-weighted assets for the quartersix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
| | | TABLE 40: STANDARDIZED APPROACH RWA ROLL-FORWARD | |
| TABLE 37: STANDARDIZED APPROACH RWA ROLL-FORWARD | | TABLE 37: STANDARDIZED APPROACH RWA ROLL-FORWARD |
| | State Street | State Street |
| (In millions) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Total estimated risk-weighted assets, beginning of period(1) | | $ | 99,876 |
| | $ | 95,893 |
| | $ | 102,683 |
| | $ | 99,876 |
|
| Changes in credit risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | |
| Net increase (decrease) in investment securities-wholesale | | 2,068 |
| | (1,471 | ) | | (1,986 | ) | | 1,729 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in loans and leases | | 3,523 |
| | 998 |
| | 1,460 |
| | 2,589 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in securitization exposures | | (216 | ) | | (3,144 | ) | | (2,787 | ) | | (690 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in repo-style transaction exposures | | 3,128 |
| | 4,994 |
| | 337 |
| | 2,058 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in OTC derivatives exposures | | (1,268 | ) | | 3,462 |
| | 5,420 |
| | (1,709 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in all other(2) | | 1,017 |
| | (229 | ) | | 2,270 |
| | (753 | ) |
| Net increase (decrease) in credit risk-weighted assets | | 8,252 |
| | 4,610 |
| | 4,714 |
| | 3,224 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in market risk-weighted assets | | (548 | ) | | (627 | ) | | 343 |
| | (417 | ) |
| Total risk-weighted assets, end of period | | $ | 107,580 |
| | $ | 99,876 |
| | $ | 107,740 |
| | $ | 102,683 |
|
(1) Standardized approach risk-weighted assets as of the periods noted above were calculated using State Street’s estimates, based on our then current interpretation of the Basel III final rule.
(2) Includes assets not in a definable category, cleared transactions, other wholesale, cash and due from, and interest-bearing deposits with banks and equity exposures.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, total standardized approach risk-weighted assets increased $7.70 billion compared to December 31, 2016,2017, primarily the result of an increase in credit risk partially offset by a decrease in market risk resulting from a lower stressed VaR.risk. The main drivers of the credit risk change are an increase in equities within the securities finance portfolio,were an increase in the investmentFX derivative portfolio due to purchases exceeding saleshigher mark to market, volumes and counterparty mix shift from banks to corporates which have a higher prescribed risk weight under the standardized approach, an increase in overdrafts and an increase in overdrafts due to an increase in U.S. short-duration advances to clients, offset by a decrease in FX contracts due to a shift to counterparties with a lower weighted-average risk-weight.
State Street Corporation | 44
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As of December 31, 2016, total standardized approach risk-weighted assets increased $3.98 billion compared to December 31, 2015, primarily the result of an increase in securities finance agency lending, an increase in market values of FX contracts,other exposures. These increases were partially offset by a decreasethe sale of $16 billion of non-HQLA assets within the investment portfolio in securitization exposures, wholesale investments and market risk. The decrease in securitization was due to sell-offs and maturities while the decrease in wholesale investments was due to callsfirst six months of agency debt securities. Market risk reduction resulted from a lower stressed VaR.2018.
The regulatory capital ratios as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, presented in Table 37:34: Regulatory Capital Structure and Related Regulatory Capital Ratios, are calculated under the standardized approach and advanced approaches in conformity with the Basel III final rule. The advanced approaches-based ratios (actual and estimated pro forma) reflect calculations and determinations with respect to our capital and related matters as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, based on State Street and external data, quantitative formulae, statistical models, historical correlations and assumptions, collectively referred to as “advanced systems,” in effect and used by State Streetus for those purposes as of the time we first reported such ratios in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q.10-Q or an annual
State Street Corporation | 43
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
report on Form 10-K. Significant components of these advanced systems involve the exercise of judgment by us and our regulators, and our advanced systems may not, individually or collectively, precisely represent or calculate the scenarios, circumstances, outputs or other results for which they are designed or intended.
Our advanced systems are subject to update and periodic revalidation in response to changes in our business activities and our historical experiences, forces and events experienced by the market broadly or by individual financial institutions, changes in regulations and regulatory interpretations and other factors, and are also subject to continuing regulatory review and approval. For example, a significant operational loss experienced by another financial institution, even if we do not experience a related loss, could result in a material change in the output of our advanced systems and a corresponding material change in our risk exposures, our total risk-weighted assets and our capital ratios compared to prior periods. An operational loss that we experience could also result in a material change in our capital requirements for operational risk under the advanced approaches, depending on the severity of the loss event, its characterization among the seven Basel-defined UOMs, and the stability of the distributional approach for a particular UOM, and without direct correlation to the effects of the loss event, or the timing of such effects, on our results of operations.
Due to the influence of changes in these advanced systems, whether resulting from changes in data inputs, regulation or regulatory supervision or interpretation, State Street-specific or market activities or experiences or other updates or factors, we expect that our advanced systems and our capital ratios calculated in conformity with the Basel III final rule will change and may be volatile over time, and that those latter changes or volatility could be material as calculated and measured from period to period. Models implemented under the Basel III final rule, particularly those implementing the advanced approaches, remain subject to regulatory review and approval. The full effects of the Basel III final rule on State Street and State Street Bank are therefore subject to further evaluation and also to further regulatory guidance, action or rule-making.
State Street Corporation | 45
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Estimated Basel III Fully Phased-in Capital Ratios
Table 41: Regulatory Capital Structure and Related Regulatory Capital Ratios - State Street, and Table 42: Regulatory Capital Structure and Related Regulatory Capital Ratios - State Street Bank, present our capital ratios for State Street and State Street Bank as of September 30, 2017, calculated in conformity with the advanced approaches provisions and standardized approach of the Basel III final rule on a pro forma basis under the fully phased-in provisions of the Basel III final rule.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 41: REGULATORY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS - STATE STREET |
September 30, 2017
(In millions) | | | | | Basel III Advanced Approaches | | Phase-In Provisions | | Basel III Advanced Approaches Fully Phased-In Pro-Forma Estimate | | Basel III Standardized Approach | | Phase-In Provisions | | Basel III Standardized Approach Fully Phased-In Pro-Forma Estimate |
| Total common shareholders' equity | | $ | 19,300 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 19,303 |
| | $ | 19,300 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 19,303 |
|
| Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities | | (6,739 | ) | | (270 | ) | | (7,009 | ) | | (6,739 | ) | | (270 | ) | | (7,009 | ) |
| Other adjustments | | (122 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (152 | ) | | (122 | ) | | (30 | ) | | (152 | ) |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | | 12,439 |
| | (297 | ) | | 12,142 |
| | 12,439 |
| | (297 | ) | | 12,142 |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock | | | | | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | 3,196 |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other adjustments | | | | | (29 | ) | | 29 |
| | — |
| | (29 | ) | | 29 |
| | — |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital | | | | | 3,167 |
| | 29 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,167 |
| | 29 |
| | 3,196 |
|
| Tier 1 capital | | | | | 15,606 |
| | (268 | ) | | 15,338 |
| | 15,606 |
| | (268 | ) | | 15,338 |
|
| Tier 2 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | | 1,072 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,073 |
| | 1,072 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,073 |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| ALLL and other | | | | | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | 6 |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Other | | | | | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Tier 2 capital | | | | | 1,078 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,079 |
| | 1,152 |
| | — |
| | 1,152 |
|
| Total capital | | | | | $ | 16,684 |
| | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | 16,417 |
| | $ | 16,758 |
| | $ | (268 | ) | | $ | 16,490 |
|
| Risk weighted assets | | | | | $ | 98,997 |
| | $ | (57 | ) | | $ | 98,940 |
| | $ | 107,580 |
| | $ | (54 | ) | | $ | 107,526 |
|
| Adjusted average assets | | | | | 211,396 |
| | (184 | ) | | 211,212 |
| | 211,396 |
| | (184 | ) | | 211,212 |
|
| Total assets for SLR | | | | | 240,636 |
| | (270 | ) | | 240,366 |
| | 240,636 |
| | (270 | ) | | 240,366 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital ratios(1): | Minimum Requirement | Minimum Requirement Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge 2017 | Minimum Requirement Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common equity tier 1 capital(2) | 4.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 8.5 | % | | 12.6 | % | | | | 12.3 | % | | 11.6 | % | |
| | 11.3 | % |
| Tier 1 capital | 6.0 |
| 8.0 |
| 10.0 |
| | 15.8 |
| | | | 15.5 |
| | 14.5 |
| |
| | 14.3 |
|
| Total capital | 8.0 |
| 10.0 |
| 12.0 |
| | 16.9 |
| | | | 16.6 |
| | 15.6 |
| |
| | 15.3 |
|
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 7.4 |
| | | | 7.3 |
| | 7.4 |
| |
| | 7.3 |
|
| Supplementary leverage | 5.0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 6.5 |
| | | | 6.4 |
| | 6.5 |
| |
| | 6.4 |
|
(1) CET1 ratio is calculated by dividing common equity tier 1 capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); tier 1 capital ratio is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); total capital ratio is calculated by dividing total capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); tier 1 leverage ratio is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by adjusted average assets (denominator); and supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by total assets for SLR (denominator).
(2) CET1 ratios were calculated in conformity with the provisions of the Basel III final rule; refer to Table 37: Regulatory Capital Structure and Related Regulatory Capital Ratios.
NA Not applicable
State Street Corporation | 46
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 42: REGULATORY CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND RELATED REGULATORY CAPITAL RATIOS - STATE STREET BANK |
September 30, 2017
(In millions) | | | | | Basel III Advanced Approaches | | Phase-In Provisions | | Basel III Advanced Approaches Fully Phased-In Pro-Forma Estimate | | Basel III Standardized Approach | | Phase-In Provisions | | Basel III Standardized Approach Fully Phased-In Pro-Forma Estimate |
| Total common shareholders' equity | | $ | 22,860 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 22,865 |
| | $ | 22,860 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 22,865 |
|
| Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities | | (6,447 | ) | | (260 | ) | | (6,707 | ) | | (6,447 | ) | | (260 | ) | | (6,707 | ) |
| Other adjustments | | (90 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (91 | ) | | (90 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (91 | ) |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | | 16,323 |
| | (256 | ) | | 16,067 |
| | 16,323 |
| | (256 | ) | | 16,067 |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Additional tier 1 capital | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tier 1 capital | | 16,323 |
| | (256 | ) | | 16,067 |
| | 16,323 |
| | (256 | ) | | 16,067 |
|
| Tier 2 capital: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | | 1,076 |
| | — |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,076 |
| | — |
| | 1,076 |
|
| ALLL and other | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 79 |
| | — |
| | 79 |
|
| Tier 2 capital | | 1,076 |
| | — |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,155 |
| | — |
| | 1,155 |
|
| Total capital | | $ | 17,399 |
| | $ | (256 | ) | | $ | 17,143 |
| | $ | 17,478 |
| | $ | (256 | ) | | $ | 17,222 |
|
| Risk weighted assets | | $ | 95,557 |
| | $ | (100 | ) | | $ | 95,457 |
| | $ | 104,227 |
| | $ | (95 | ) | | $ | 104,132 |
|
| Adjusted average assets | | 208,308 |
| | (176 | ) | | 208,132 |
| | 208,308 |
| | (176 | ) | | 208,132 |
|
| Total assets for SLR | | 237,579 |
| | (260 | ) | | 237,319 |
| | 237,579 |
| | (260 | ) | | 237,319 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital ratios(1): | Minimum Requirement | Minimum Requirement Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge 2017 | Minimum Requirement Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge 2019 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common equity tier 1 capital(2) | 4.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 8.5 | % | | 17.1 | % | |
| | 16.8 | % | | 15.7 | % | |
| | 15.4 | % |
| Tier 1 capital | 6.0 |
| 8.0 |
| 10.0 |
| | 17.1 |
| |
| | 16.8 |
| | 15.7 |
| |
| | 15.4 |
|
| Total capital | 8.0 |
| 10.0 |
| 12.0 |
| | 18.2 |
| |
| | 18.0 |
| | 16.8 |
| |
| | 16.5 |
|
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 7.8 |
| |
| | 7.7 |
| | 7.8 |
| |
| | 7.7 |
|
| Supplementary leverage | 6.0 |
| NA |
| NA |
| | 6.9 |
| |
| | 6.8 |
| | 6.9 |
| |
| | 6.8 |
|
(1) CET1 capital ratio is calculated by dividing common equity tier 1 capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); tier 1 capital ratio is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); total capital ratio is calculated by dividing total capital (numerator) by risk-weighted assets (denominator); tier 1 leverage ratio is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by adjusted average assets (denominator); and supplementary leverage ratio is calculated by dividing tier 1 capital (numerator) by total assets for SLR (denominator).
(2) CET1 ratios were calculated in conformity with the provisions of the Basel III final rule; refer to Table 37: Regulatory Capital Structure and Related Regulatory Capital Ratios.
NA Not applicable
Fully phased-in pro-forma estimates of common shareholders' equity include 100% of AOCI, including AOCI attributable to AFS securities, cash flow hedges and defined benefit pension plans. Fully phased-in pro-forma estimates of CET1 capital reflect 100% of applicable deductions, including but not limited to, intangible assets net of deferred tax liabilities. Fully phased-in tier 1 capital reflects the transition of trust preferred capital securities from tier 1 capital to tier 2 capital. For both Basel III advanced and standardized approaches, fully phased-in pro-forma estimates of risk-weighted assets reflect the exclusion of intangible assets, offset by additions related to non-significant equity exposures and deferred tax assets related to temporary differences.
The Volcker rule, including the required capital deduction for investments in a covered fund, became effective on July 21, 2015, for investments in and relationships with a covered fund made after December 31, 2013. For legacy covered funds, the Volcker rule capital deduction became effective on July 21, 2017. For additional information on the Volcker rule, refer to pages 9 to 10 included under Item 1, Business, in our 2016 Form 10-K.
State Street Corporation | 47
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Supplementary Leverage Ratio
In 2014, U.S. banking regulators issued final rules implementing an SLR, for certain bank holding companies, like State Street, and their insured depository institution subsidiaries, like State Street Bank, which we refer to as the SLR final rule. Upon implementation, theThe SLR final rule requires that, as of January 1, 2018, (i) State Street Bank maintain an SLR of at least 6% to be well capitalized under the U.S. banking regulators’ PCA framework and (ii) State Streetwe maintain an SLR of at least 5% to avoid
limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments. In addition to the SLR, State Street iswe are subject to a minimum tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%, which differs from the SLR primarily in that the denominator of the tier 1 leverage ratio is only a quarterly average of on-balance sheet assets and does not include any off-balance sheet exposures. Beginning with reporting for March 31, 2015,
|
| | | | |
| TABLE 38: SUPPLEMENTARY LEVERAGE RATIO |
| (In millions) | | June 30, 2018 |
| State Street: | | |
| Tier 1 capital | | $ | 15,419 |
|
| | | |
| On-and off-balance sheet leverage exposure | | 257,354 |
|
| Less: regulatory deductions | | (7,194 | ) |
| Total assets for SLR | | $ | 250,160 |
|
| Supplementary leverage ratio | | 6.2 | % |
| | | |
| State Street Bank: | | |
| Tier 1 capital | | $ | 16,795 |
|
| | | |
| On-and off-balance sheet leverage exposure | | 254,588 |
|
| Less: regulatory deductions | | (6,755 | ) |
| Total assets for SLR | | $ | 247,833 |
|
| Supplementary leverage ratio | | 6.8 | % |
State Street was required to include SLR disclosures, calculated on a transitional basis, with its other Basel disclosures.Corporation | 44
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 43: SUPPLEMENTARY LEVERAGE RATIO |
| September 30, 2017 | | Transitional SLR | | Phase-In Provisions | | Fully Phased-in Pro-Forma SLR Estimate |
| (Dollars in millions) | | | |
| State Street: | | | | | | |
| Tier 1 capital | | $ | 15,606 |
| | $ | (268 | ) | | $ | 15,338 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| On-and off-balance sheet leverage exposure | | 247,527 |
| | — |
| | 247,527 |
|
| Less: regulatory deductions | | (6,891 | ) | | (270 | ) | | (7,161 | ) |
| Total assets for SLR | | $ | 240,636 |
| | $ | (270 | ) | | $ | 240,366 |
|
| Supplementary leverage ratio | | 6.5 | % | | (0.1 | )% | | 6.4 | % |
| | | | | | | |
| State Street Bank: | | | | | | |
| Tier 1 capital | | $ | 16,323 |
| | $ | (256 | ) | | $ | 16,067 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| On-and off-balance sheet leverage exposure | | 244,114 |
| | — |
| | 244,114 |
|
| Less: regulatory deductions | | (6,535 | ) | | (260 | ) | | (6,795 | ) |
| Total assets for SLR | | $ | 237,579 |
| | $ | (260 | ) | | $ | 237,319 |
|
| Supplementary leverage ratio | | 6.9 | % | | (0.1 | )% | | 6.8 | % |
Capital Actions
Preferred Stock
The following table summarizes selected terms of each of the series of the preferred stock issued and outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017:2018:
| | | TABLE 44: PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING | |
| TABLE 39: PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING | | TABLE 39: PREFERRED STOCK ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING |
| | Issuance Date | | Depositary Shares Issued | | Ownership Interest Per Depositary Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Depositary Share | | Net Proceeds of Offering (In millions) | | Redemption Date(1) | Issuance Date | | Depositary Shares Issued | | Ownership Interest Per Depositary Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Depositary Share | | Net Proceeds of Offering (In millions) | | Redemption Date(1) |
Preferred Stock(2): | Preferred Stock(2): | | | | | | | | | | Preferred Stock(2): | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | August 2012 | | 20,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| $ | 100,000 |
|
| $ | 25 |
|
| $ | 488 |
|
| September 15, 2017 | August 2012 | | 20,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| $ | 100,000 |
|
| $ | 25 |
|
| $ | 488 |
|
| September 15, 2017 |
| Series D | February 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 742 |
|
| March 15, 2024 | February 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 742 |
|
| March 15, 2024 |
| Series E | November 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 728 |
|
| December 15, 2019 | November 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 728 |
|
| December 15, 2019 |
| Series F | May 2015 | | 750,000 |
|
| 1/100th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 1,000 |
|
| 742 |
|
| September 15, 2020 | May 2015 | | 750,000 |
|
| 1/100th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 1,000 |
|
| 742 |
|
| September 15, 2020 |
| Series G | April 2016 | | 20,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 493 |
|
| March 15, 2026 | April 2016 | | 20,000,000 |
|
| 1/4,000th |
| 100,000 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 493 |
|
| March 15, 2026 |
(1) On the redemption date, or any dividend declaration date thereafter, the preferred stock and corresponding depositary shares may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at the liquidation price per share and liquidation price per depositary share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. (2) The preferred stock and corresponding depositary shares may be redeemed at our option in whole, but not in part, prior to the redemption date upon the occurrence of a regulatory capital treatment event, as defined in the certificate of designation, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per share and liquidation price per depositary share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends.
State Street Corporation | 48
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present the dividends declared for each of the series of preferred stock issued and outstanding for the periods indicated:
| | | TABLE 45: PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS QUARTERS TO DATE | |
| TABLE 40: PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS | | TABLE 40: PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions)(1) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions)(1) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) |
| Preferred Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | $ | 1,313 |
|
| $ | 0.33 |
|
| $ | 6 |
|
| $ | 1,313 |
|
| $ | 0.33 |
|
| $ | 6 |
| $ | 1,313 |
|
| $ | 0.33 |
|
| $ | 7 |
|
| $ | 1,313 |
|
| $ | 0.33 |
|
| $ | 7 |
|
| Series D | 1,475 |
|
| 0.37 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 1,475 |
|
| 0.37 |
|
| 11 |
| 1,475 |
|
| 0.37 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 1,475 |
|
| 0.37 |
|
| 11 |
|
| Series E | 1,500 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 1,500 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 11 |
| 1,500 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 1,500 |
|
| 0.38 |
|
| 11 |
|
| Series F | 2,625 |
|
| 26.25 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 2,625 |
|
| 26.25 |
|
| 20 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| Series G | 1,338 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 1,338 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 7 |
| 1,338 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 1,338 |
|
| 0.33 |
|
| 7 |
|
| Total | | | | | $ | 55 |
| | | | | | $ | 55 |
| | | | | $ | 36 |
| | | | | | $ | 36 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) |
| Preferred Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | | $ | 2,626 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 2,626 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Series D | | 2,950 |
| | 0.74 |
| | 22 |
| | 2,950 |
| | 0.74 |
| | 22 |
|
| Series E | | 3,000 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 22 |
| | 3,000 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 22 |
|
| Series F | | 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
| | 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
|
| Series G | | 2,676 |
| | 0.66 |
| | 14 |
| | 2,676 |
| | 0.66 |
| | 14 |
|
| Total | | | | | | $ | 91 |
| | | | | | $ | 91 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 46: PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions) |
| Preferred Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 0.99 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 0.99 |
| | $ | 19 |
|
| Series D | 4,425 |
| | 1.11 |
| | 33 |
| | 4,425 |
| | 1.11 |
| | 33 |
|
| Series E | 4,500 |
| | 1.14 |
| | 33 |
| | 4,500 |
| | 1.14 |
| | 33 |
|
| Series F | 5,250 |
| | 52.50 |
| | 40 |
| | 5,250 |
| | 52.50 |
| | 40 |
|
| Series G | 4,014 |
| | 0.99 |
| | 21 |
| | 2,289 |
| | 0.57 |
| | 12 |
|
| Total | | | | | $ | 146 |
| | | | | | $ | 137 |
|
(1) Dividends were paid in September 2017.June 2018.
State Street Corporation | 45
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
In October 2017,July 2018, we declared dividends on our Series C, D, E, F and G preferred stock of approximately $1,313, $1,475, $1,500, $2,625 and $1,338,$1,388, respectively, per share, or approximately $0.33, $0.37, $0.38, $26.25 and $0.33, respectively, per depositary share. These dividends total approximately $6$7 million, $11 million, $11 million, $20 million and $7 million on our Series C, D, E, F and G preferred stock, respectively, which will be paid in December 2017. September 2018.
Common Stock
In June 2017, our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $1.4 billion of our common stock through June 30, 2018 (the 2017 Program).
In June 2016,2018, the Federal Reserve issued a conditional non-objection to our capital plan submitted as part of the 2018 CCAR submission; and in connection with such capital plan our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to$1.4 $1.2 billion of our common stock through June 30, 20172019 (the 20162018 Program). In connection with our proposed acquisition of Charles River Development, we did not purchase any common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 under the 2017 Program and we do not intend to purchase any common stock during the third and fourth quarters of 2018 under the 2018 Program. We intend to resume our common stock purchases in the first quarter of 2019 and may repurchase up to $600 million through June 30, 2019.
The table below presents the activity under both the 2017 Program and 2016 Program during the periodsperiod indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 47: SHARES REPURCHASED |
| | Quarter Ended September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |
| | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) | | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) |
2016 Program(1) | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 9.4 |
| | $ | 79.93 |
| | $ | 750 |
|
| 2017 Program | 3.7 |
| | 93.39 |
| | 350 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 93.39 |
| | 350 |
|
| Total | 3.7 |
| | $ | 93.39 |
| | $ | 350 |
| | 13.1 |
| | $ | 83.77 |
| | $ | 1,100 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| TABLE 41: SHARES REPURCHASED |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018(1) |
| | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) |
| 2017 Program | 3.3 |
| | $ | 105.31 |
| | $ | 350 |
|
(1) Includes $158 million relating toThere were no shares acquiredrepurchased in exchange for BFDS stock during the firstsecond quarter of 2017. Additional information about the exchange is provided in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.2018.
State Street Corporation | 49
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The table below presents the dividends declared on common stock for the periods indicated: | | | TABLE 48: COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS | |
| TABLE 42: COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS | | TABLE 42: COMMON STOCK DIVIDENDS |
| | Quarters Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Common Stock | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 156 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 442 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 414 |
| $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 142 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total
(In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total
(In millions) |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Common Stock | | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 0.76 |
| | $ | 286 |
|
On July 19, 2018, we declared a common stock dividend for the third quarter of 2018 in the amount of
$0.47 per share, representing an increase of 12% from the common stock dividend of $0.42 per share declared in the second quarter of 2018.
Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on dividends paid by subsidiary banks to the parent holding company. In addition, banking regulators have the authority to prohibit bank holding companies from paying dividends. For information concerning limitations on dividends from our subsidiary banks, refer to pages 48 and 49 to 50 included under Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities, and to Note 15 on pages 176169 to 178171 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K. Our common stock and preferred stock dividends, including the declaration, timing and amount thereof, are subject to consideration and approval by the Board at the relevant times. Stock purchases may be made using various types of mechanisms, including open market purchases, accelerated share repurchases or transactions off market and may be made under Rule 10b5-1 trading programs. The timing of stock purchases, types of transactions and number of shares purchased will depend on several factors, including, market conditions and State Street’s capital positions, its financial performance and investment opportunities. The common stock purchase program does not have specific price targets and may be suspended at any time.
State Street Corporation | 50
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
On behalf of clients enrolled in our securities lending program, we lend securities to banks, broker/dealers and other institutions. In most circumstances, we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities. Though these transactions are collateralized, the substantial volume of these activities necessitates detailed credit-based underwriting and monitoring processes. The aggregate amount of indemnified securities on loan totaled $379.46$396.80 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, compared to $360.45$381.82 billion as of December 31, 2016.2017. We require the borrower to provide collateral in an amount in excess of 100% of the fair market value of the securities borrowed. We hold the collateral received in connection with these securities lending services as agent, and the collateral is not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. We revalue the securities on loan and the collateral daily to determine if additional collateral is necessary or if excess collateral is required to be returned to the borrower. We held, as agent, cash and securities totaling $396.12$416.08 billion and $377.92$400.83 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
State Street Corporation | 46
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The cash collateral held by us as agent is invested on behalf of our clients. In certain cases, the cash collateral is invested in third-party repurchase agreements, for which we indemnify the client against loss of the principal invested. We require the counterparty to the indemnified repurchase agreement to provide collateral in an amount in excess of 100% of the amount of the repurchase agreement. In our role as agent, the indemnified repurchase agreements and the related collateral held by us are not recorded in our consolidated statement of condition. Of the collateral of $396.12$416.08 billion and $377.92$400.83 billion, referenced above, $68.24$59.39 billion and $60.00$61.27 billion was invested in indemnified repurchase agreements as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively. We or our agents held $73.16$63.02 billion and $63.96$65.27 billion as collateral for indemnified investments in repurchase agreements as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively.
Additional information about our securities finance activities and other off-balance sheet arrangements is provided in Notes 7 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Information with respect to recent accounting developments is provided in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
State Street Corporation | 5147
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information provided under Financial Condition - Market Risk Management in Management’s Discussion and Analysis, included in this Form 10-Q, is incorporated by reference herein. For more information on our market risk refer to pages 9894 to 105101 included under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
State Street hasWe have established and maintainsmaintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information related to State Streetus and itsour subsidiaries on a consolidated basis required to be disclosed in itsour reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to State Street'sour management, including itsour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. For the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, State Street's2018, our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of State Street'sour disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that State Street'sour disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018.
State Street has alsoWe have established and maintainsmaintain internal controlcontrols over financial reporting as a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in conformity with GAAP. In the ordinary course of business, State Streetwe routinely enhances itsenhance our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting by either upgrading itsour current systems or implementing new systems. Changes have been made and may be made to State Street'sour internal controls and procedures for financial reporting as a result of these efforts. During the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, no change occurred in State Street'sour internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, State Street'sour internal control over financial reporting.
State Street Corporation | 5248
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Fee revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Servicing fees | $ | 1,351 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| | $ | 3,986 |
| | $ | 3,784 |
| $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | 1,339 |
| | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 2,635 |
|
| Management fees | 419 |
| | 368 |
| | 1,198 |
| | 931 |
| 465 |
| | 397 |
| | 937 |
| | 779 |
|
| Trading services | 259 |
| | 267 |
| | 823 |
| | 806 |
| 315 |
| | 289 |
| | 619 |
| | 564 |
|
| Securities finance | 147 |
| | 136 |
| | 459 |
| | 426 |
| 154 |
| | 179 |
| | 295 |
| | 312 |
|
| Processing fees and other | 66 |
| | 5 |
| | 209 |
| | 155 |
| 43 |
| | 31 |
| | 83 |
| | 143 |
|
| Total fee revenue | 2,242 |
| | 2,079 |
| | 6,675 |
| | 6,102 |
| 2,358 |
| | 2,235 |
| | 4,736 |
| | 4,433 |
|
| Net interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | 761 |
| | 647 |
| | 2,111 |
| | 1,896 |
| 907 |
| | 700 |
| | 1,764 |
| | 1,350 |
|
| Interest expense | 158 |
| | 110 |
| | 423 |
| | 326 |
| 248 |
| | 125 |
| | 462 |
| | 265 |
|
| Net interest income | 603 |
| | 537 |
| | 1,688 |
| | 1,570 |
| 659 |
| | 575 |
| | 1,302 |
| | 1,085 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities, net | 1 |
| | 6 |
| | (39 | ) | | 7 |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | (40 | ) |
| Losses from other-than-temporary impairment | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | (40 | ) |
| Total revenue | 2,846 |
| | 2,620 |
| | 8,324 |
| | 7,677 |
| 3,026 |
| | 2,810 |
| | 6,045 |
| | 5,478 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 3 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | 8 |
| 2 |
| | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Compensation and employee benefits | 1,090 |
| | 1,013 |
| | 3,327 |
| | 3,109 |
| 1,125 |
| | 1,071 |
| | 2,374 |
| | 2,237 |
|
| Information systems and communications | 296 |
| | 285 |
| | 866 |
| | 827 |
| 321 |
| | 283 |
| | 636 |
| | 570 |
|
| Transaction processing services | 215 |
| | 200 |
| | 619 |
| | 601 |
| 246 |
| | 207 |
| | 488 |
| | 404 |
|
| Occupancy | 118 |
| | 107 |
| | 344 |
| | 331 |
| 124 |
| | 116 |
| | 244 |
| | 226 |
|
| Acquisition and restructuring costs | 33 |
| | 42 |
| | 133 |
| | 166 |
| — |
| | 71 |
| | — |
| | 100 |
|
| Professional services | 71 |
| | 95 |
| | 262 |
| | 270 |
| 89 |
| | 97 |
| | 168 |
| | 191 |
|
| Amortization of other intangible assets | 54 |
| | 55 |
| | 160 |
| | 153 |
| 48 |
| | 54 |
| | 98 |
| | 106 |
|
| Other | 144 |
| | 187 |
| | 427 |
| | 437 |
| 206 |
| | 132 |
| | 407 |
| | 283 |
|
| Total expenses | 2,021 |
| | 1,984 |
| | 6,138 |
| | 5,894 |
| 2,159 |
| | 2,031 |
| | 4,415 |
| | 4,117 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | 822 |
| | 636 |
| | 2,182 |
| | 1,775 |
| |
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | | 865 |
| | 776 |
| | 1,628 |
| | 1,360 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 137 |
| | 72 |
| | 375 |
| | 226 |
| 131 |
| | 156 |
| | 233 |
| | 238 |
|
| Net income from non-controlling interest | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | 1 |
| |
| Net income | $ | 685 |
| | $ | 563 |
| | $ | 1,807 |
| | $ | 1,550 |
| $ | 734 |
| | $ | 620 |
| | $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
|
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 629 |
| | $ | 507 |
| | $ | 1,659 |
| | $ | 1,411 |
| $ | 698 |
| | $ | 584 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
|
| Earnings per common share: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| | $ | 4.41 |
| | $ | 3.58 |
| $ | 1.91 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
| | $ | 3.55 |
| | $ | 2.72 |
|
| Diluted | 1.66 |
| | 1.29 |
| | 4.35 |
| | 3.54 |
| 1.88 |
| | 1.53 |
| | 3.51 |
| | 2.69 |
|
| Average common shares outstanding (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic | 372,765 |
| | 388,358 |
| | 376,430 |
| | 393,959 |
| 365,619 |
| | 375,395 |
| | 366,524 |
| | 378,293 |
|
| Diluted | 378,518 |
| | 393,212 |
| | 381,779 |
| | 398,413 |
| 370,410 |
| | 380,915 |
| | 371,415 |
| | 383,489 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | .42 |
| | $ | .38 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| $ | .42 |
| | $ | .38 |
| | $ | .84 |
| | $ | .76 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5349
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net income | $ | 685 |
| | $ | 563 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related taxes: | | | |
| Foreign currency translation, net of related taxes of ($7) and ($14), respectively | 259 |
| | 38 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and net of related taxes of $28 and ($11), respectively | 47 |
| | (13 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges, net of related taxes of $4 and $9, respectively | 4 |
| | 13 |
|
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit, net of related taxes of $1 and $1, respectively | 1 |
| | 2 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of related taxes of ($15) and ($27), respectively | (27 | ) | | (39 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans, net of related taxes of $0 and ($1), respectively | 2 |
| | 3 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 286 |
| | 4 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 971 |
| | $ | 567 |
|
| | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net income | $ | 1,807 |
| | $ | 1,550 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related taxes: | | | |
| Foreign currency translation, net of related taxes of $6 and ($24), respectively | 785 |
| | 132 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and net of related taxes of $336 and $347, respectively | 519 |
| | 533 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges, net of related taxes of $9 and ($6), respectively | 13 |
| | (9 | ) |
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit, net of related taxes of $2 and $3, respectively | 3 |
| | 5 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of related taxes of ($179) and ($144), respectively | (274 | ) | | (213 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans, net of related taxes of $2 and $2, respectively | 10 |
| | 1 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | 1,056 |
| | 449 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 2,863 |
| | $ | 1,999 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 734 |
| | $ | 620 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related taxes: | | | |
| Foreign currency translation, net of related taxes of ($114) and ($110), respectively | (338 | ) | | 435 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and net of related taxes of ($20) and $177, respectively | (122 | ) | | 271 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges, net of related taxes of $1 and zero, respectively | 5 |
| | 3 |
|
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit, net of related taxes of $1 and zero, respectively | (1 | ) | | 1 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of related taxes of $9 and ($113), respectively | 40 |
| | (177 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans, net of related taxes of zero and ($1), respectively | 2 |
| | 2 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (414 | ) | | 535 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 320 |
| | $ | 1,155 |
|
| | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of related taxes: | | | |
| Foreign currency translation, net of related taxes of ($62) and $13, respectively | (187 | ) | | 526 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of reclassification adjustment and net of related taxes of ($136) and $308, respectively | (257 | ) | | 472 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges, net of related taxes of $22 and $5, respectively | 9 |
| | 9 |
|
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit, net of related taxes of $3 and $1, respectively | (1 | ) | | 2 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of related taxes of ($10) and ($164), respectively | (57 | ) | | (247 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans, net of related taxes of $3 and $2, respectively | 14 |
| | 8 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (479 | ) | | 770 |
|
| Total comprehensive income | $ | 916 |
| | $ | 1,892 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5450
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CONDITION
(UNAUDITED)
| | | (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Assets: | (Unaudited) | | | (Unaudited) | | |
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 1,314 |
| $ | 3,886 |
| | $ | 2,107 |
|
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | 60,956 |
| | 70,935 |
| 76,366 |
| | 67,227 |
|
| Securities purchased under resale agreements | 3,465 |
| | 1,956 |
| 3,583 |
| | 3,241 |
|
| Trading account assets | 1,135 |
| | 1,024 |
| 1,160 |
| | 1,093 |
|
| Investment securities available-for-sale | 56,238 |
| | 61,998 |
| 47,348 |
| | 57,121 |
|
| Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $36,836 and $34,994) | 36,850 |
| | 35,169 |
| |
| Loans and leases (less allowance for losses of $57 and $53) | 23,581 |
| | 19,704 |
| |
| Premises and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $3,750 and $3,333) | 2,167 |
| | 2,062 |
| |
| Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $38,805 and $40,255) | | 39,594 |
| | 40,458 |
|
| Loans and leases (less allowance for losses of $55 and $54) | | 24,069 |
| | 23,240 |
|
| Premises and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $3,999 and $3,881) | | 2,189 |
| | 2,186 |
|
| Accrued interest and fees receivable | 3,043 |
| | 2,644 |
| 3,086 |
| | 3,099 |
|
| Goodwill | 5,997 |
| | 5,814 |
| 5,973 |
| | 6,022 |
|
| Other intangible assets | 1,658 |
| | 1,750 |
| 1,500 |
| | 1,613 |
|
| Other assets | 36,957 |
| | 38,328 |
| 39,554 |
| | 31,018 |
|
| Total assets | $ | 235,986 |
| | $ | 242,698 |
| $ | 248,308 |
| | $ | 238,425 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Deposits: | | | | | | |
| Non-interest-bearing | $ | 49,850 |
| | $ | 59,397 |
| $ | 52,316 |
| | $ | 47,175 |
|
| Interest-bearing—U.S. | 49,394 |
| | 30,911 |
| 57,407 |
| | 50,139 |
|
| Interest-bearing—non-U.S. | 80,019 |
| | 96,855 |
| 76,940 |
| | 87,582 |
|
| Total deposits | 179,263 |
| | 187,163 |
| 186,663 |
| | 184,896 |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 3,867 |
| | 4,400 |
| 3,088 |
| | 2,842 |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | 1,253 |
| | 1,585 |
| 1,103 |
| | 1,144 |
|
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 17,390 |
| | 16,901 |
| 24,496 |
| | 15,606 |
|
| Long-term debt | 11,716 |
| | 11,430 |
| 10,387 |
| | 11,620 |
|
| Total liabilities | 213,489 |
| | 221,479 |
| 225,737 |
| | 216,108 |
|
| Commitments, guarantees and contingencies (Notes 9 and 10) |
| |
|
| |
|
| Shareholders’ equity: | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock, no par, 3,500,000 shares authorized: | | | | | | |
| Series C, 5,000 shares issued and outstanding | 491 |
| | 491 |
| 491 |
| | 491 |
|
| Series D, 7,500 shares issued and outstanding | 742 |
| | 742 |
| 742 |
| | 742 |
|
| Series E, 7,500 shares issued and outstanding | 728 |
| | 728 |
| 728 |
| | 728 |
|
| Series F, 7,500 shares issued and outstanding | 742 |
| | 742 |
| 742 |
| | 742 |
|
| Series G, 5,000 shares issued and outstanding | 493 |
| | 493 |
| 493 |
| | 493 |
|
| Common stock, $1 par, 750,000,000 shares authorized: | | | | | | |
| 503,879,642 and 503,879,642 shares issued | 504 |
| | 504 |
| 504 |
| | 504 |
|
| Surplus | 9,803 |
| | 9,782 |
| 9,820 |
| | 9,799 |
|
| Retained earnings | 18,675 |
| | 17,459 |
| 19,856 |
| | 18,856 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (984 | ) | | (2,040 | ) | (1,488 | ) | | (1,009 | ) |
| Treasury stock, at cost (133,038,955 and 121,940,502 shares) | (8,697 | ) | | (7,682 | ) | |
| Treasury stock, at cost (138,052,038 and 136,229,784 shares) | | (9,317 | ) | | (9,029 | ) |
| Total shareholders’ equity | 22,497 |
| | 21,219 |
| 22,571 |
| | 22,317 |
|
| Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 235,986 |
| | $ | 242,698 |
| $ | 248,308 |
| | $ | 238,425 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5551
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
| | | (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts, shares in thousands) | PREFERRED STOCK | | COMMON STOCK | | Surplus | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | TREASURY STOCK | | Total | PREFERRED STOCK | | COMMON STOCK | | Surplus | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | TREASURY STOCK | | Total |
| Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | | Shares | | Amount | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 2,703 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,746 |
| | $ | 16,049 |
| | $ | (1,442 | ) | | 104,228 |
| | $ | (6,457 | ) | | $ | 21,103 |
| |
| Net income | | | | | | | | | 1,550 |
| | | | | | | | 1,550 |
| |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | 449 |
| | | | | | 449 |
| |
| Preferred stock issued | 493 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 493 |
| |
| Cash dividends declared: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock - $1.06 per share | | | | | | | | | (414 | ) | | | | | | | | (414 | ) | |
| Preferred stock | | | | | | | | | (137 | ) | | | | | | | | (137 | ) | |
| Common stock acquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,861 |
| | (1,040 | ) | | (1,040 | ) | |
| Common stock awards and options exercised, including income tax benefit of $6 | | | | | | | 32 |
| | | | | | (2,765 | ) | | 114 |
| | 146 |
| |
| Other | | | | | | |
|
| | (1 | ) | | | | (15 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| |
| Balance as of September 30, 2016 | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,778 |
| | $ | 17,047 |
| | $ | (993 | ) | | 118,309 |
| | $ | (7,382 | ) | | $ | 22,150 |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,782 |
| | $ | 17,459 |
| | $ | (2,040 | ) | | 121,941 |
| | $ | (7,682 | ) | | $ | 21,219 |
| $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,782 |
| | $ | 17,459 |
| | $ | (2,040 | ) | | 121,941 |
| | $ | (7,682 | ) | | $ | 21,219 |
|
| Net income | | | | | | | | | 1,807 |
| |
|
| | | | | | 1,807 |
| | | | | | | | | 1,122 |
| | | | | | | | 1,122 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | 1,056 |
| | | | | | 1,056 |
| | | | | | | | | | | 770 |
| | | | | | 770 |
|
| Cash dividends declared: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock - $1.18 per share | | | | | | | | | (442 | ) | | | | | | | | (442 | ) | |
| Common stock - $0.76 per share | | | | | | | | | | (286 | ) | | | | | | | | (286 | ) |
| Preferred stock | | | | | | | | | (146 | ) | | | | | | | | (146 | ) | | | | | | | | | (91 | ) | | | | | | | | (91 | ) |
| Common stock acquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,131 |
| | (1,100 | ) | | (1,100 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,383 |
| | (750 | ) | | (750 | ) |
| Common stock awards exercised | | | | | | | 21 |
| |
|
| | | | (2,033 | ) | | 85 |
| | 106 |
| |
| Common stock awards vested | | | | | | | | 21 |
| | | | | | (1,551 | ) | | 65 |
| | 86 |
|
| Other | | | | | | | | | (3 | ) | | | |
|
| |
|
| | (3 | ) | | | | | | | | | (2 | ) | | | |
|
| | | | (2 | ) |
| Balance as of September 30, 2017 | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,803 |
| | $ | 18,675 |
| | $ | (984 | ) | | 133,039 |
| | $ | (8,697 | ) | | $ | 22,497 |
| |
| Balance as of June 30, 2017 | | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,803 |
| | $ | 18,202 |
| | $ | (1,270 | ) | | 129,773 |
| | $ | (8,367 | ) | | $ | 22,068 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,799 |
| | $ | 18,856 |
| | $ | (1,009 | ) | | 136,230 |
| | $ | (9,029 | ) | | $ | 22,317 |
|
| Net income | | | | | | | | | | 1,395 |
| |
|
| | | | | | 1,395 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | | | | | | | | | | | | (479 | ) | | | | | | (479 | ) |
| Cash dividends declared: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Common stock - $0.84 per share | | | | | | | | | | (307 | ) | | | | | | | | (307 | ) |
| Preferred stock | | | | | | | | | | (91 | ) | | | | | | | | (91 | ) |
| Common stock acquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,324 |
| | (350 | ) | | (350 | ) |
| Common stock awards vested | | | | | | | | 21 |
| | | | | | (1,498 | ) | | 62 |
| | 83 |
|
| Other | | | | | | | |
|
| | 3 |
| | | | (4 | ) | |
|
| | 3 |
|
| Balance as of June 30, 2018 | | $ | 3,196 |
| | 503,880 |
| | $ | 504 |
| | $ | 9,820 |
| | $ | 19,856 |
| | $ | (1,488 | ) | | 138,052 |
| | $ | (9,317 | ) | | $ | 22,571 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5652
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Activities: | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 1,807 |
| | $ | 1,550 |
| $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | | | | | | |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) | (217 | ) | | 31 |
| (93 | ) | | (56 | ) |
| Amortization of other intangible assets | 160 |
| | 153 |
| 98 |
| | 106 |
|
| Other non-cash adjustments for depreciation, amortization and accretion, net | 636 |
| | 517 |
| 489 |
| | 415 |
|
| Losses (gains) related to investment securities, net | 39 |
| | (5 | ) | |
| (Gains) losses related to investment securities, net | | (7 | ) | | 40 |
|
| Change in trading account assets, net | (111 | ) | | (214 | ) | (67 | ) | | 128 |
|
| Change in accrued interest and fees receivable, net | (399 | ) | | (248 | ) | 13 |
| | (161 | ) |
| Change in collateral deposits, net | (1,232 | ) | | (615 | ) | 3,159 |
| | (1,047 | ) |
| Change in unrealized losses on foreign exchange derivatives, net | 1,136 |
| | 853 |
| (2,956 | ) | | 3,578 |
|
| Change in other assets, net | (2,063 | ) | | (457 | ) | (276 | ) | | (1,787 | ) |
| Change in accrued expenses and other liabilities, net | 1,733 |
| | 399 |
| 1,379 |
| | 1,354 |
|
| Other, net | 368 |
| | 312 |
| 268 |
| | 307 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,857 |
| | 2,276 |
| 3,402 |
| | 3,999 |
|
| Investing Activities: | | | | | | |
| Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits with banks | 9,979 |
| | (3,752 | ) | |
| Net (increase) decrease in securities purchased under resale agreements | (1,509 | ) | | 962 |
| |
| Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing deposits with banks | | (9,139 | ) | | 7,318 |
|
| Net (increase) in securities purchased under resale agreements | | (342 | ) | | (1,216 | ) |
| Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities | 7,122 |
| | 424 |
| 15,687 |
| | 4,354 |
|
| Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities | 21,619 |
| | 21,564 |
| 8,009 |
| | 15,178 |
|
| Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (20,891 | ) | | (22,625 | ) | (15,459 | ) | | (14,880 | ) |
| Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities | 2,647 |
| | 7,184 |
| 2,863 |
| | 1,621 |
|
| Purchases of held-to-maturity securities | (3,961 | ) | | (5,581 | ) | (2,102 | ) | | (2,636 | ) |
| Net (increase) in loans and leases | (3,859 | ) | | (2,678 | ) | (819 | ) | | (4,587 | ) |
| Business acquisitions | — |
| | (437 | ) | |
| Purchases of equity investments and other long-term assets | (32 | ) | | (265 | ) | (173 | ) | | (19 | ) |
| Purchases of premises and equipment, net | (485 | ) | | (477 | ) | (285 | ) | | (325 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of joint venture investment | 172 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 172 |
|
| Other, net | 77 |
| | 129 |
| 28 |
| | 36 |
|
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 10,879 |
| | (5,552 | ) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | | (1,732 | ) | | 5,016 |
|
| Financing Activities: | | | | | | |
| Net (decrease) increase in time deposits | (16,790 | ) | | 9,077 |
| |
| Net increase (decrease) in all other deposits | 8,890 |
| | (1,938 | ) | |
| Net (decrease) in other short-term borrowings | (865 | ) | | (476 | ) | |
| Net increase (decrease) in time deposits | | 2,727 |
| | (17,067 | ) |
| Net (decrease) increase in all other deposits | | (960 | ) | | 11,320 |
|
| Net increase (decrease) in other short-term borrowings | | 205 |
| | (664 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of issuance costs | 747 |
| | 1,492 |
| — |
| | 747 |
|
| Payments for long-term debt and obligations under capital leases | (482 | ) | | (1,430 | ) | (1,024 | ) | | (471 | ) |
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net | — |
| | 493 |
| |
| Purchases of common stock | (942 | ) | | (1,029 | ) | (350 | ) | | (592 | ) |
| Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation | — |
| | 6 |
| |
| Repurchases of common stock for employee tax withholding | (101 | ) | | (95 | ) | (90 | ) | | (76 | ) |
| Payments for cash dividends | (577 | ) | | (541 | ) | (399 | ) | | (379 | ) |
| Other, net | 9 |
| | — |
| — |
| | 9 |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (10,111 | ) | | 5,559 |
| |
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | 109 |
| | (7,173 | ) |
| Net increase | 2,625 |
| | 2,283 |
| 1,779 |
| | 1,842 |
|
| Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 1,314 |
| | 1,207 |
| 2,107 |
| | 1,314 |
|
| Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 3,490 |
| $ | 3,886 |
| | $ | 3,156 |
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5753
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| Note 14. Net Interest Income | |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
We use acronyms and other defined terms for certain business terms and abbreviations, as defined in the acronyms list and glossary accompanying these consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 5854
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accounting and financial reporting policies of State Street Corporation conform to U.S. GAAP. State Street Corporation, the Parent Company, is a financial holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Unless otherwise indicated or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in these notes to consolidated financial statements to “State Street,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar references mean State Street Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Our principal banking subsidiary is State Street Bank.
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the financial and risk factor information included in our 20162017 Form 10-K, which we previously filed with the SEC.
The consolidated financial statements accompanying these condensed notes are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated results of operations in these financial statements, have been made. Certain previously reported amounts presented in this Form 10-Q have been reclassified to
conform to current-period presentation. Events occurring subsequent to the date of our consolidated statement of condition were evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure in our
consolidated financial statements through the date we filed this Form 10-Q with the SEC.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions in the application of certain of our significant accounting policies that may materially affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue and expenses. As a result of unanticipated events or circumstances, actual results could differ from those estimates. These accounting estimates reflect the best judgment of management, but actual results could differ.
Our consolidated statement of condition as of December 31, 20162017 included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all notes required by U.S. GAAP for a complete set of consolidated financial statements.
Dispositions
In the first quarter of 2017, we completed the sale of our joint venture interest in IFDS U.K. for approximately $175 million in cash and the exchange of our joint venture interest in BFDS stock for $158 million in State Street's common stock. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $30 million, in the aggregate, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 on these dispositions.
State Street Corporation | 5955
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Recent Accounting Developments
|
| | | |
| Relevant standards that were issued but not yet adopted |
| | | |
| Standard | Description | Date of Adoption | Effects on the financial statements or other significant matters |
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) | The standard, and its related amendments, will replace existing revenue recognition standards and expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements with customers. Under the new standard, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective method). | January 1, 2018 | Based on our efforts to date, we expect both the timing and amount of our material revenue streams, including servicing fees, management fees, trading services, and securities finance, to remain substantially unchanged as these revenues likely will continue to be recognized over time. Specifically, under the new standard we expect to recognize revenue related to these activities ratably over the term of the related agreements with customers as the customer simultaneously benefits from the services as they are performed. Due to the complexity of certain of our agreements, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the standard will be dependent on contract-specific terms, and certain aspects may vary in some instances from recognition ratably over the contract term.
The standard does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities, or revenue recognized under other U.S. GAAP standards. Therefore NII, securities gains/ losses and revenue related to derivative instruments are not impacted by the standard.
Our implementation efforts include the scoping of material revenue streams into cohorts, analysis of underlying contracts for each cohort, business unit workshops to further assess specific contracts and products, and the development of updated disclosures.
We continue to monitor industry developments and focus our assessment on areas such as costs that may require capitalization under the new standard and the impact of changes to the principal and agent guidance. The new standard modified the principal and agent guidance which we expect to result in recognition of certain expenses on a gross basis, rather than offset against revenue. We are still assessing the completeness and materiality of these changes. We continue to assess the operational and disclosure impacts of each transition method and have not yet finalized the transition method to be applied.
|
ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities | The standard makes limited amendments to the guidance on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Under the new standard, all equity securities will be measured at fair value through earnings with certain exceptions, including investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting. In addition, the FASB clarified the guidance related to valuation allowance assessments when recognizing deferred tax assets on unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. This standard must be applied on a retrospective basis. | January 1, 2018 | Based on our assessment, we do not anticipate this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements due to the limited number of investments on our consolidated statement of condition that are within scope of the standard. |
| ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) | The standard represents a wholesale change to lease accounting and requires all leases, other than short-term leases, to be reported on balance sheet through recognition of a right-of-use asset and a corresponding liability for future lease obligations. The standard also requires extensive disclosures for assets, expenses, and cash flows associated with leases, as well as a maturity analysis of lease liabilities. | January 1, 2019 | We are currently assessing the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements, but we anticipate an increase in assets and liabilities due to the recognition of the required right-of-use asset and corresponding liability for all lease obligations that are currently classified as operating leases, primarily real estate leases for office space, as well as additional disclosure on all our lease obligations. |
State Street Corporation | 60
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | |
Relevant standards that were issued but not yet adopted |
Standard | Description | Date of Adoption | Effects on the financial statements or other significant matters |
| ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments | The standard replaces the existing incurred loss impairment guidance and requires immediate recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets carried at amortized cost, including trade and other receivables, loans and commitments, held-to-maturity debt securities and other financial assets, held at the reporting date to be measured based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable supportable forecasts. Credit losses onThe standard also amends existing impairment guidance for available-for-sale securities, and credit losses will be recorded as an allowance versus a write-down of the amortized cost basis of the security and will allow for a reversal of impairment loss when the credit of the issuer improves. The guidance requires a cumulative effect of initial application to be recognized in retained earnings at the date of initial application. | January 1, 2020, early adoption permitted | We are currently assessing the impact of the standard on our consolidated financial statements, and a significant implementation project is in place to ensure that expected credit losses are calculated in accordance with the standard. We have established a steering committee to provide cross-functional governance over the project plan and key decisions, and are currently developing key accounting policies, assessing existing credit loss models against the new guidance and processes and identifying a complete set of data requirements and sources. We have commenced the development ofcontinue to develop and test new orand modified credit loss models and based on our analysis to date, we expect the timing of the allowance for credit losses to accelerate under the new standard. We are continuing to assess the extent of the impact on the allowance for credit losses. |
ASU 2016-15, Statementlosses which will be impacted by the Company's portfolio and the macroeconomic factors on the date of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force) | The standard amends the statement of cash flow guidance to address specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. | January 1, 2018 | Based on our current presentation we do not anticipate a significant change to our presentation of the statement of cash flows. |
ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business | The standard incorporates gating criteria to determine when an integrated set of assets and activities is not a business. When substantially all the fair value of gross assets acquired (or group of similar identifiable assets) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset, it would not represent a business. | January 1, 2018, early adoption permitted | We will apply this standard prospectively to transactions occurring after January 1, 2018, as applicable.adoption. |
| ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment | The standard simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The ASU requires an entity to compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss. | January 1, 2020, early adoption permitted | We are evaluating the impacts of early adoption, and will apply this standard prospectively upon adoption. |
| ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities | The standard shortens the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date. | January 1, 2019, early adoption permitted | We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard and the early adoption provisions. |
| ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities | The standard amends the hedge accounting model to better portray the economics of risk management activities in the financial statements and enhances the presentation of hedge results. The amendments also make targeted changes to simplify the application of hedge accounting in certain situations. | January 1, 2019, early adoption permitted
| We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard and the early adoption provisions. |
ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
| This standard provides an election to reclassify the stranded tax effects resulting from the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings.
| January 1, 2019, early adoption permitted
| We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard and the early adoption provisions. |
We adopted ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, effective January 1, 2017. Starting in the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we reclassified excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation from financing activities to other operating activities. We continued to present repurchases of common stock for employee tax withholding in financing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows for all periods presented.
As required by the transition provisions of the standard, excess tax benefits previously recognized in surplus prior to January 1, 2017 remain in surplus, and excess tax benefits recognized after January 1, 2017 are included in income tax expense. In connection with this change, we recognized a tax benefit of $18.6 million in the first nine months of 2017. We elected to make no changes to our current policy of estimating forfeitures. Lastly, we did not make any changes to tax withholding rates.
State Street Corporation | 6156
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
We adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), on January 1, 2018. The standard provides companies with a single model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle requires a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. We used the modified retrospective method of transition, which requires the impact of applying the standard on prior periods to be reflected in opening retained earnings upon adoption. The adoption of the standard does not have a material impact on the timing of recognition of revenue in our consolidated statement of income, or our consolidated statement of position, and therefore no adjustment has been made to retained earnings. However, due to the updated principal and agent guidance in the standard, certain costs we pay to third parties on behalf of our clients previously reported in our consolidated statement of income on a net basis, primarily against the related management fee revenue, and trading services revenue are now reported on a gross basis as expenses.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, both revenues and expenses increased by approximately $135 million, primarily due to the updated principal and agent guidance. The revenue impact was approximately $90 million in management fees, $35 million in trading services, and $10 million across other revenue line items, and the expense impact was approximately $30 million in transaction processing, $90 million in other expenses, and $15 million in information systems and communication. Adoption of the standard had no impact on cash from or used in operating, financing, or investing activities on our consolidated statements of cash flows.
We adopted ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, effective January 1, 2018. Under the new standard, all equity securities will be measured at fair value through earnings with certain exceptions, including investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting or where the fair market value of an equity security is not readily available. Upon adoption
of the standard on January 1, 2018, we reclassified approximately $397 million of money market funds and $46 million of equity securities held at fair value through profit and loss in other assets. The cumulative-effect transition adjustment recognized in retained earnings on January 1, 2018, and the change in fair value recognized through profit and loss for the period ended June 30, 2018, were immaterial to the financial statements.
Note 2. Fair Value
Fair Value Measurements
We carry trading account assets and liabilities, AFS investmentdebt securities, certain equity securities and various types of derivative financial instruments, at fair value in our consolidated statement of condition on a recurring basis. Changes in the fair values of these financial assets and liabilities are recorded either as components of our consolidated statement of income or as components of AOCI within shareholders' equity in our consolidated statement of condition.
We measure fair value for the above-described financial assets and liabilities in conformity with U.S. GAAP that governs the measurement of the fair value of financial instruments. Management believes that its valuation techniques and underlying assumptions used to measure fair value conform to the provisions of U.S. GAAP. We categorize the financial assets and liabilities that we carry at fair value based on a
prescribed three-level valuation hierarchy. For information about our valuation techniques for financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value and the fair value hierarchy, refer to pages 135131 to 142138 in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
The following tables present information with respect to our financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value in our consolidated statement of condition on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, approximately2018, no assets or liabilities were transferred between levels 1 and 2. Approximately $9 million of assets were transferred between levels 1 and 2. No transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels 1 and 2 occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
State Street Corporation | 6257
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis | Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis |
| | as of September 30, 2017 | As of June 30, 2018 |
| (In millions) | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Impact of Netting(1) | | Total Net Carrying Value in Consolidated Statement of Condition | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Impact of Netting(1) | | Total Net Carrying Value in Consolidated Statement of Condition |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading account assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | $ | 39 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 39 |
| $ | 39 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 39 |
|
| Non-U.S. government securities | 387 |
| | 174 |
| | — |
| | | | 561 |
| 374 |
| | 135 |
| | — |
| | | | 509 |
|
| Other | 20 |
| | 515 |
| | — |
| | | | 535 |
| 79 |
| | 533 |
| | — |
| | | | 612 |
|
| Total trading account assets | 446 |
| | 689 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,135 |
| 492 |
| | 668 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,160 |
|
| AFS investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | 231 |
| | 389 |
| | — |
| | | | 620 |
| 11 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | | | 11 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | 10,975 |
| | 25 |
| | | | 11,000 |
| — |
| | 15,893 |
| | — |
| | | | 15,893 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 11 |
| | 15,893 |
| | — |
| | | | 15,904 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | — |
| | 4,626 |
| | 200 |
| | | | 4,826 |
| — |
| | 1,567 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,567 |
|
| Credit cards | — |
| | 1,548 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,548 |
| — |
| | 617 |
| | — |
| | | | 617 |
|
Other(2) | — |
| | 35 |
| | 1,186 |
| | | | 1,221 |
| |
| CLOs | | — |
| | — |
| | 851 |
| | | | 851 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | — |
| | 6,209 |
| | 1,386 |
| |
| | 7,595 |
| — |
| | 2,184 |
| | 851 |
| |
| | 3,035 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | 6,956 |
| | 118 |
| | | | 7,074 |
| — |
| | 2,615 |
| | — |
| | | | 2,615 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | — |
| | 2,742 |
| | 97 |
| | | | 2,839 |
| — |
| | 1,183 |
| | 474 |
| | | | 1,657 |
|
| Government securities | — |
| | 6,658 |
| | — |
| | | | 6,658 |
| — |
| | 13,072 |
| | — |
| | | | 13,072 |
|
Other(3) | — |
| | 5,617 |
| | 201 |
| | | | 5,818 |
| |
Other(2) | | — |
| | 4,283 |
| | 169 |
| | | | 4,452 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | — |
| | 21,973 |
| | 416 |
| | | | 22,389 |
| — |
| | 21,153 |
| | 643 |
| | | | 21,796 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | — |
| | 9,700 |
| | 38 |
| | | | 9,738 |
| — |
| | 4,228 |
| | — |
| | | | 4,228 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | — |
| | 1,528 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,528 |
| — |
| | 319 |
| | — |
| | | | 319 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | — |
| | 2,909 |
| | 19 |
| | | | 2,928 |
| — |
| | 2,066 |
| | — |
| | | | 2,066 |
|
| U.S. equity securities | — |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| | | | 46 |
| |
| U.S. money-market mutual funds | — |
| | 394 |
| | — |
| | | | 394 |
| |
| Total AFS investment securities | 231 |
| | 54,123 |
| | 1,884 |
| |
| | 56,238 |
| 11 |
| | 45,843 |
| | 1,494 |
| |
| | 47,348 |
|
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | 11,735 |
| | 2 |
| | $ | (7,026 | ) | | 4,711 |
| — |
| | 17,373 |
| | 7 |
| | (11,231 | ) | | 6,149 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 1 |
| |
| Other derivative contracts | | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | — |
| | 11,738 |
| | 2 |
| | (7,028 | ) | | 4,712 |
| 2 |
| | 17,373 |
| | 7 |
| | (11,231 | ) | | 6,151 |
|
| Other | 22 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22 |
| — |
| | 449 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 449 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 699 |
| | $ | 66,550 |
| | $ | 1,886 |
| | $ | (7,028 | ) | | $ | 62,107 |
| $ | 505 |
| | $ | 64,333 |
| | $ | 1,501 |
| | $ | (11,231 | ) | | $ | 55,108 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading account liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | $ | 19 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 19 |
| 70 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 70 |
|
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | 11,581 |
| | 2 |
| | (7,465 | ) | | 4,118 |
| — |
| | 17,552 |
| | 6 |
| | (12,608 | ) | | 4,950 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | 10 |
| | 97 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 106 |
| 4 |
| | 102 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 106 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | — |
| | 319 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 319 |
| 2 |
| | 268 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 270 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 10 |
| | 11,997 |
| | 2 |
| | (7,466 | ) | | 4,543 |
| 6 |
| | 17,922 |
| | 6 |
| | (12,608 | ) | | 5,326 |
|
| Other | 22 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 22 |
| |
| Total liabilities carried at fair value | $ | 51 |
| | $ | 11,997 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | (7,466 | ) | | $ | 4,584 |
| $ | 76 |
| | $ | 17,922 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (12,608 | ) | | $ | 5,396 |
|
(1) Represents counterparty netting against level 2 financial assets and liabilities where a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between State Street and the counterparty. Netting also reflects asset and liability reductions of $637$1,557 million and $1,074$2,934 million, respectively, for cash collateral received from and provided to derivative counterparties.
(2) As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, the fair value of other ABS was primarily composed of $1,221 million of CLOs.
(3) As of September 30, 2017,2018, the fair value of other non-U.S. debt securities was primarily composed of $3,600$1,959 million of covered bonds and $1,503$1,735 million of corporate bonds.
State Street Corporation | 6358
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis | Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis |
| | as of December 31, 2016 | As of December 31, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Impact of Netting(1) | | Total Net Carrying Value in Consolidated Statement of Condition | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Impact of Netting(1) | | Total Net Carrying Value in Consolidated Statement of Condition |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading account assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. government securities | $ | 30 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 30 |
| $ | 39 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 39 |
|
| Non-U.S. government securities | 495 |
| | 174 |
| | — |
| | | | 669 |
| 389 |
| | 93 |
| | — |
| | | | 482 |
|
| Other | — |
| | 325 |
| | — |
| | | | 325 |
| 44 |
| | 528 |
| | — |
| | | | 572 |
|
| Total trading account assets | 525 |
| | 499 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,024 |
| 472 |
| | 621 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,093 |
|
| AFS investment securities: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
| Direct obligations | 3,824 |
| | 439 |
| | — |
| | | | 4,263 |
| 11 |
|
| 212 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 223 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | 13,257 |
| | — |
| | | | 13,257 |
| — |
|
| 10,872 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 10,872 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 11 |
|
| 11,084 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 11,095 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
| Student loans | — |
| | 5,499 |
| | 97 |
| | | | 5,596 |
| — |
|
| 3,358 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 3,358 |
|
| Credit cards | — |
| | 1,351 |
| | — |
| | | | 1,351 |
| — |
|
| 1,542 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 1,542 |
|
| Sub-prime | — |
| | 272 |
| | — |
| | | | 272 |
| |
Other(2) | — |
| | — |
| | 905 |
| | | | 905 |
| |
| CLOs | | — |
|
| 89 |
|
| 1,358 |
| | |
| 1,447 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | — |
| | 7,122 |
| | 1,002 |
| | | | 8,124 |
| — |
|
| 4,989 |
|
| 1,358 |
| | |
| 6,347 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | |
|
|
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | 6,535 |
| | — |
| | | | 6,535 |
| — |
|
| 6,576 |
|
| 119 |
| | |
| 6,695 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | — |
| | 2,484 |
| | 32 |
| | | | 2,516 |
| — |
|
| 2,545 |
|
| 402 |
| | |
| 2,947 |
|
| Government securities | — |
| | 5,836 |
| | — |
| | | | 5,836 |
| — |
|
| 10,721 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 10,721 |
|
Other(3)(2) | — |
| | 5,365 |
| | 248 |
| | | | 5,613 |
| — |
|
| 5,904 |
|
| 204 |
| | |
| 6,108 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | — |
| | 20,220 |
| | 280 |
| | | | 20,500 |
| — |
|
| 25,746 |
|
| 725 |
| | |
| 26,471 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | — |
| | 10,283 |
| | 39 |
| | | | 10,322 |
| — |
|
| 9,108 |
|
| 43 |
| | |
| 9,151 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | — |
| | 2,577 |
| | 16 |
| | | | 2,593 |
| — |
|
| 1,054 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 1,054 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | — |
| | 2,469 |
| | — |
| | | | 2,469 |
| — |
|
| 2,560 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 2,560 |
|
| U.S. equity securities | — |
| | 42 |
| | — |
| | | | 42 |
| — |
|
| 46 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 46 |
|
| Non-U.S. equity securities | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | | | 3 |
| |
| U.S. money-market mutual funds | — |
| | 409 |
| | — |
| | | | 409 |
| — |
|
| 397 |
|
| — |
| | |
| 397 |
|
| Non-U.S. money-market mutual funds | — |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | | | 16 |
| |
| Total AFS investment securities | 3,824 |
| | 56,837 |
| | 1,337 |
| | | | 61,998 |
| 11 |
|
| 54,984 |
|
| 2,126 |
| | |
| 57,121 |
|
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| Derivatives instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | — |
| | 16,476 |
| | 8 |
| | $ | (9,163 | ) | | 7,321 |
| — |
|
| 11,596 |
|
| 1 |
| | (7,593 | ) | | 4,004 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | — |
| | 68 |
| | — |
| | (68 | ) | | — |
| 8 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | | 1 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | — |
| | 16,544 |
| | 8 |
| | (9,231 | ) | | 7,321 |
| 9 |
|
| 11,596 |
|
| 1 |
| | (7,593 | ) | | 4,013 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 4,349 |
| | $ | 73,880 |
| | $ | 1,345 |
| | $ | (9,231 | ) | | $ | 70,343 |
| $ | 492 |
|
| $ | 67,201 |
|
| $ | 2,127 |
| | $ | (7,593 | ) | | $ | 62,227 |
|
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
| Trading account liabilities: | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
| Other | | 39 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 39 |
|
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | — |
| | $ | 15,948 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (10,456 | ) | | $ | 5,500 |
| — |
|
| 11,467 |
|
| 1 |
| | (5,970 | ) | | 5,498 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | — |
| | 348 |
| | — |
| | (226 | ) | | 122 |
| — |
|
| 100 |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 100 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | — |
| | 380 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 380 |
| 1 |
|
| 283 |
|
| — |
| | — |
| | 284 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | — |
| | 16,676 |
| | 8 |
| | (10,682 | ) | | 6,002 |
| 1 |
|
| 11,850 |
|
| 1 |
| | (5,970 | ) | | 5,882 |
|
| Total liabilities carried at fair value | $ | — |
| | $ | 16,676 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | (10,682 | ) | | $ | 6,002 |
| $ | 40 |
|
| $ | 11,850 |
|
| $ | 1 |
| | $ | (5,970 | ) | | $ | 5,921 |
|
(1) Represents counterparty netting against level 2 financial assets and liabilities where a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists between State Street and the counterparty. Netting also reflects asset and liability reductions of $906$2,045 million and $2,356$422 million, respectively, for cash collateral received from and provided to derivative counterparties.
(2) As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of other ABS was primarily composed of $905 million of CLOs.
(3) As of December 31, 2016,2017, the fair value of other non-U.S. debt securities was primarily composed of $3,769$3,537 million of covered bonds and $988$1,885 million of corporate bonds.
State Street Corporation | 6459
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables present activity related to our level 3 financial assets during the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, including total realized and 2016, respectively.unrealized gains and losses. Transfers into and out of level 3 are reported as of the beginning of the period presented. During the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, transfers into level 3 were mainly related to certain ABS, and MBS, including non-U.S. debt securities, for which fair value was measured using information obtained from third-party sources, including non-binding broker or dealer quotes.securities. During the ninethree and six months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, transfers out of level 3 were mainly related to certain MBS and ABS, including non-U.S. debt securities, for which fair value was measured using prices for which observable market information became available. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 |
| | Fair Value as of June 30, 2017 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Transfers into Level 3 | | Fair Value as of
September 30, 2017(2) | | Change in
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)
Related to
Financial
Instruments
Held as of
September 30, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Recorded in Revenue(1) | | Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income(1) | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AFS Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | |
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 200 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 200 |
| | |
| Other | 951 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 60 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 175 |
| | 1,186 |
| | |
| Total asset-backed securities | 951 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 260 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 175 |
| | 1,386 |
| | |
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 118 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 118 |
| | |
| Asset-backed securities | 63 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
| | (10 | ) | | — |
| | 15 |
| | 97 |
| | |
| Other | 274 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (80 | ) | | 7 |
| | — |
| | 201 |
| | |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 337 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 147 |
|
| (90 | ) | | 7 |
| | 15 |
| | 416 |
| | |
| State and political subdivisions | 38 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 38 |
| | |
| Other U.S. debt securities | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | |
| Total AFS investment securities | 1,345 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 407 |
|
| (90 | ) |
| 5 |
|
| 215 |
|
| 1,884 |
| | |
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| | 2 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
| Total derivative instruments | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| | 2 |
| | (2 | ) |
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 1,350 |
|
| $ | 1 |
|
| $ | 1 |
|
| $ | 409 |
|
| $ | (90 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 215 |
|
| $ | 1,886 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
(2) There were no transfers of assets out of level 3 during the three months ended September 30, 2017.
State Street Corporation | 65
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | Fair Value as of
December 31,
2016 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Transfers into Level 3 | | Transfers out of Level 3 | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2017 | | Change in
Unrealized
Gains
(Losses)
Related to
Financial
Instruments
Held as of
September 30, 2017 | Fair Value
as of
March 31,
2018 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Fair Value as of June 30, 2018(1) | | Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of June 30,
2018 |
| (In millions) | Recorded in Revenue(1) | | Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income(1) | | Recorded in Revenue(1) | | Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income(1) | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AFS Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25 |
| | | |
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| Student loans | 97 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 200 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (98 | ) | | 200 |
| | | |
| Other | 905 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 415 |
| | — |
| | (412 | ) | | 276 |
| | — |
| | 1,186 |
| | | |
| CLOs | | $ | 826 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 26 |
| | $ | 851 |
| | |
| Total asset-backed securities | 1,002 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 615 |
| | — |
|
| (412 | ) |
| 276 |
|
| (98 | ) |
| 1,386 |
| | | 826 |
| | 1 |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 26 |
| | 851 |
| | |
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 118 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 118 |
| | | |
| Asset-backed securities | 32 |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | 60 |
| | (10 | ) | | (21 | ) | | 67 |
| | (31 | ) | | 97 |
| | | 272 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 269 |
| | — |
| | (67 | ) | | 474 |
| | |
| Other | 248 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | (80 | ) | | 28 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 201 |
| | | 178 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) | | 169 |
| | |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 280 |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| 183 |
| | (90 | ) |
| 7 |
|
| 67 |
|
| (31 | ) |
| 416 |
| | | 450 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 269 |
| | — |
| | (76 | ) | | 643 |
| | |
| State and political subdivisions | 39 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 38 |
| | | 37 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (37 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 16 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) | | — |
| | | |
| Other U.S. debt securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | | |
| Total AFS investment securities | 1,337 |
|
| 3 |
|
| — |
|
| 840 |
| | (90 | ) |
| (406 | ) |
| 368 |
|
| (168 | ) |
| 1,884 |
| | | 1,313 |
| | 1 |
| | (2 | ) | | 269 |
| | (37 | ) | | (50 | ) | | 1,494 |
| | |
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 8 |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | 7 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 8 |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | 3 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (3 | ) | | 7 |
| | 2 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 1,345 |
|
| $ | (3 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 844 |
| | $ | (90 | ) |
| $ | (410 | ) |
| $ | 368 |
|
| $ | (168 | ) |
| $ | 1,886 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1,316 |
|
| $ | 4 |
|
| $ | (2 | ) |
| $ | 273 |
|
| $ | (37 | ) |
| $ | (53 | ) |
| $ | 1,501 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
| | | | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | Fair Value as of
June 30, 2016 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Settlements | | Transfers
out of
Level 3 | | Fair Value as of September 30,
2016(2) | | Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of September 30,
2016 | Fair Value as of
December 31,
2017 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Sales | | Settlements | | Transfers into Level 3 | | Transfers out of Level 3 | | Fair Value as of June 30, 2018(1) | | Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of June 30, 2018 |
| (In millions) | Recorded in Revenue(1) | | Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income(1) | | | Recorded in Revenue(1) | | Recorded in Other Comprehensive Income(1) | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AFS Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies, mortgage-backed securities | $ | 25 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 50 |
| | | |
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | 190 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 192 |
| | | |
| Other | 1,710 |
| | 13 |
| | (8 | ) | | 118 |
| | (560 | ) | | — |
| | 1,273 |
| | | |
| CLOs | | $ | 1,358 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 318 |
| | $ | (636 | ) | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (209 | ) | | $ | 851 |
| | |
| Total asset-backed securities | 1,900 |
| | 13 |
| | (6 | ) | | 118 |
| | (560 | ) | | — |
| | 1,465 |
| | | 1,358 |
| | 2 |
| | (3 | ) | | 318 |
| | (636 | ) | | 21 |
| | — |
| | (209 | ) | | 851 |
| | |
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | | 119 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (119 | ) | | — |
| | |
| Asset-backed securities | 111 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | (9 | ) | | (54 | ) | | 138 |
| | | 402 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 380 |
| | (311 | ) | | (64 | ) | | 68 |
| | — |
| | 474 |
| | |
| Other | 261 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 194 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 458 |
| | | 204 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (35 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 169 |
| | |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 372 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 374 |
| | (6 | ) | | (54 | ) | | 686 |
| | | 725 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 380 |
| | (311 | ) | | (99 | ) | | 68 |
| | (119 | ) | | 643 |
| | |
| State and political subdivisions | 33 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40 |
| | | 43 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | (37 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5 | ) | | — |
| | |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 68 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 36 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
| | 102 |
| | | |
| Total AFS investment securities | 2,398 |
| | 13 |
| | 2 |
| | 553 |
| | (569 | ) | | (54 | ) | | 2,343 |
| | | 2,126 |
| | 2 |
| | (4 | ) | | 697 |
| | (984 | ) | | (78 | ) | | 68 |
| | (333 | ) | | 1,494 |
| | |
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | 2 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 2,398 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 553 |
| | $ | (569 | ) | | $ | (54 | ) | | $ | 2,343 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 2,127 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | 702 |
| | $ | (984 | ) | | $ | (78 | ) | | $ | 68 |
| | $ | (333 | ) | | $ | 1,501 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
(2) There were no transfers of assets into level 3 during the three months ended September 30, 2016.
State Street Corporation | 66
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |
| | Fair Value as of December 31, 2015 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Settlements | | Transfers
out of
Level 3 | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2016(2) | | Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of September 30,
2016 |
| (In millions) | Recorded
in
Revenue(1) | | Recorded
in Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AFS Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies, mortgage-backed securities | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 325 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (275 | ) | | $ | 50 |
| | |
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | 189 |
| | 1 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 192 |
| | |
| Other | 1,764 |
| | 29 |
| | (21 | ) | | 250 |
| | (749 | ) | | — |
| | 1,273 |
| | |
| Total asset-backed securities | 1,953 |
| | 30 |
| | (19 | ) | | 250 |
| | (749 | ) | | — |
| | 1,465 |
| | |
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 90 |
| | |
| Asset-backed securities | 174 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 196 |
| | (43 | ) | | (188 | ) | | 138 |
| | |
| Other | 255 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 223 |
| | 9 |
| | (29 | ) | | 458 |
| | |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 429 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 509 |
| | (34 | ) | | (217 | ) | | 686 |
| | |
| State and political subdivisions | 33 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | — |
| | 40 |
| | |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 39 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 86 |
| | (25 | ) | | — |
| | 102 |
| | |
| Other U.S. debt securities | 10 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | |
| Total AFS investment securities | 2,464 |
| | 30 |
| | (9 | ) | | 1,170 |
| | (820 | ) | | (492 | ) | | 2,343 |
| | |
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 5 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 5 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 2,469 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | 1,170 |
| | $ | (828 | ) | | $ | (492 | ) | | $ | 2,343 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |
| | Fair Value as of December 31, 2015 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized (Gains) Losses | | Settlements | | Fair Value as of September 30, 2016(3) | | Change in Unrealized
(Gains) Losses Related to
Financial Instruments Held as of September 30, 2016 |
| (In millions) | Recorded in Revenue | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities: | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 5 |
| | 5 |
| | (10 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total liabilities carried at fair value | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
(2) There were no transfers of assets into level 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
(3) There were no transfers of liabilities into or out of level 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
State Street Corporation | 6760
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
| | Fair Value as of March 31,
2017 |
| Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
| Purchases |
| Settlements |
| Transfers
into
Level 3 |
| Transfers
out of
Level 3 |
| Fair Value as of June 30,
2017 |
| Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of June 30, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Recorded
in
Revenue(1) |
| Recorded
in Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) |
|
| Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AFS Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Student loans | $ | 99 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | (99 | ) |
| $ | — |
|
|
|
| CLOs | 771 |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| 199 |
|
| (120 | ) |
| 101 |
|
| — |
|
| 951 |
|
|
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 870 |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| 199 |
|
| (120 | ) |
| 101 |
|
| (99 | ) |
| 951 |
|
|
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Asset-backed securities | 59 |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| — |
|
| (16 | ) |
| 51 |
|
| (31 | ) |
| 63 |
|
|
|
| Other | 256 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 18 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 274 |
|
|
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 315 |
|
| 1 |
|
| (1 | ) |
| — |
|
| 2 |
|
| 51 |
|
| (31 | ) |
| 337 |
|
|
|
| State and political subdivisions | 39 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (1 | ) |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 38 |
|
|
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 39 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| (39 | ) |
| — |
|
|
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 19 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
| Total AFS investment securities | 1,263 |
|
| 2 |
|
| (2 | ) |
| 218 |
|
| (119 | ) |
| 152 |
|
| (169 | ) |
| 1,345 |
|
|
|
| Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Derivative instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 5 |
|
| $ | 2 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 2 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 5 |
|
| 2 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 1,265 |
|
| $ | 3 |
|
| $ | (2 | ) |
| $ | 220 |
|
| $ | (119 | ) |
| $ | 152 |
|
| $ | (169 | ) |
| $ | 1,350 |
|
| $ | 2 |
|
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
| | Fair Value as of December 31, 2016 | | Total Realized and
Unrealized Gains (Losses) | | Purchases | | Settlements | | Transfers
into
Level 3 | | Transfers
out of
Level 3 | | Fair Value as of June 30,
2017 | | Change in Unrealized Gains (Losses) Related to Financial Instruments Held as of June 30, 2017 |
| (In millions) | | Recorded
in
Revenue(1) | | Recorded
in Other
Comprehensive
Income(1) | | | | | | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| AFS Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | $ | 97 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (99 | ) | | $ | — |
| | |
| CLOs | 905 |
| | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | 354 |
| | (410 | ) | | 101 |
| | — |
| | 951 |
| | |
| Total asset-backed securities | 1,002 |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | 354 |
| | (410 | ) | | 101 |
| | (99 | ) | | 951 |
| | |
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asset-backed securities | 32 |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | 31 |
| | (20 | ) | | 51 |
| | (31 | ) | | 63 |
| | |
| Other | 248 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | 21 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 274 |
| | |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 280 |
| | 1 |
| | (1 | ) | | 36 |
| | 1 |
| | 51 |
| | (31 | ) | | 337 |
| | |
| State and political subdivisions | 39 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 38 |
| | |
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 16 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) | | — |
| | |
| Other U.S. debt securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19 |
| | |
| Total AFS investment securities | 1,337 |
|
| 3 |
|
| — |
|
| 432 |
|
| (410 | ) |
| 152 |
|
| (169 | ) |
| 1,345 |
| | |
| Other assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | 8 |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 7 |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Total derivative instruments | 8 |
| | (6 | ) | | — |
| | 7 |
| | (4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | 2 |
|
| Total assets carried at fair value | $ | 1,345 |
| | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 439 |
| | $ | (414 | ) | | $ | 152 |
| | $ | (169 | ) | | $ | 1,350 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
(1) Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on AFS investment securities are included within gains (losses) related to investment securities, net. Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments are included within trading services.
State Street Corporation | 61
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents quantitative information, as of the dates indicated, about the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of our level 3 financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which we use internally-developed pricing models. The significant unobservable inputs for our level 3 financial assets and liabilities whose fair value is measured using pricing information from non-binding broker or dealer quotes are not included in the table, as the specific inputs applied are not provided by the broker/dealer.
| | | | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
| | Fair Value | | Weighted-Average | Fair Value | | Weighted-Average |
| (Dollars in millions) | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of December 31, 2016 | | Valuation Technique | | Significant
Unobservable Input(1) | | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of December 31, 2016 | As of June 30, 2018 | | As of December 31, 2017 | | Valuation Technique | | Significant
Unobservable Input(1) | | As of June 30, 2018 | | As of December 31, 2017 |
| Significant unobservable inputs readily available to State Street: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asset-backed securities, other | $ | — |
| | $ | 1 |
| | Discounted cash flows | | Credit spread | | — | % | | 0.3 | % | |
| State and political subdivisions | 38 |
| | 39 |
| | Discounted cash flows | | Credit spread | | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
| |
| Derivative instruments, foreign exchange contracts | 2 |
| | 8 |
| | Option model | | Volatility | | 8.3 |
| | 14.4 |
| $ | 7 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | Option model | | Volatility | | 8.4 | % | | 7.2 | % |
| Total | $ | 40 |
| | $ | 48 |
| | | | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivative instruments, foreign exchange contracts | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | Option model | | Volatility | | 8.3 |
| | 14.4 |
| $ | 6 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | Option model | | Volatility | | 8.3 | % | | 7.2 | % |
| Total | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | | | | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | | | |
Fair Value Estimates
Estimates of fair value for financial instruments not carried at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated statement of condition are generally subjective in nature, and are determined as of a specific point in time based on the characteristics of the financial instruments and relevant market information.
The following tables present the reported amounts and estimated fair values of the financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value on a recurring basis, as they would be categorized within the fair value hierarchy, as of the dates indicated.
| | | | | | | | | Fair Value Hierarchy | | | | | | Fair Value Hierarchy |
| (In millions) | | Reported Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Reported Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) |
| September 30, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2018 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and due from banks | | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,886 |
| | $ | 3,886 |
| | $ | 3,886 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | | 60,956 |
| | 60,956 |
| | — |
| | 60,956 |
| | — |
| | 76,366 |
| | 76,366 |
| | — |
| | 76,366 |
| | — |
|
| Securities purchased under resale agreements | | 3,465 |
| | 3,465 |
| | — |
| | 3,465 |
| | — |
| | 3,583 |
| | 3,583 |
| | — |
| | 3,583 |
| | — |
|
| Investment securities held-to-maturity | | 36,850 |
| | 36,836 |
| | 17,362 |
| | 19,351 |
| | 123 |
| | 39,594 |
| | 38,805 |
| | 15,639 |
| | 23,043 |
| | 123 |
|
Net loans (excluding leases) | | 22,868 |
| | 22,866 |
| | — |
| | 22,811 |
| | 55 |
| | 23,638 |
| | 23,613 |
| | — |
| | 23,571 |
| | 42 |
|
Other(2) | | | 7,000 |
| | 7,000 |
| | — |
| | 7,000 |
| | — |
|
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-interest-bearing | | $ | 49,850 |
| | $ | 49,850 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 49,850 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 52,316 |
| | $ | 52,316 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 52,316 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest-bearing - U.S. | | 49,394 |
| | 49,394 |
| | — |
| | 49,394 |
| | — |
| | 57,407 |
| | 57,407 |
| | — |
| | 57,407 |
| | — |
|
| Interest-bearing - non-U.S. | | 80,019 |
| | 80,019 |
| | — |
| | 80,019 |
| | — |
| | 76,940 |
| | 76,940 |
| | — |
| | 76,940 |
| | — |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | 3,867 |
| | 3,867 |
| | — |
| | 3,867 |
| | — |
| | 3,088 |
| | 3,088 |
| | — |
| | 3,088 |
| | — |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | | 1,253 |
| | 1,253 |
| | — |
| | 1,253 |
| | — |
| | 1,103 |
| | 1,103 |
| | — |
| | 1,103 |
| | — |
|
| Long-term debt | | 11,716 |
| | 12,022 |
| | — |
| | 11,725 |
| | 297 |
| | 10,387 |
| | 10,597 |
| | — |
| | 10,346 |
| | 251 |
|
Other(2) | | | 7,000 |
| | 7,000 |
| | — |
| | 7,000 |
| | — |
|
(1) Includes $22 million of loans classified as held-for-sale that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2018.
(2) Represents a portion of underlying client assets related to our enhanced custody business, which assets clients have allowed us to transfer and re-pledge.
State Street Corporation | 6862
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | | | | | Fair Value Hierarchy | | | | | | Fair Value Hierarchy |
| (In millions) | | Reported Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) | | Reported Amount | | Estimated Fair Value | | Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets (Level 1) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Observable Market Inputs (Level 2) | | Pricing Methods with Significant Unobservable Market Inputs (Level 3) |
| December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Financial Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and due from banks | | $ | 1,314 |
| | $ | 1,314 |
| | $ | 1,314 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,107 |
| | $ | 2,107 |
| | $ | 2,107 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest-bearing deposits with banks | | 70,935 |
| | 70,935 |
| | — |
| | 70,935 |
| | — |
| | 67,227 |
| | 67,227 |
| | — |
| | 67,227 |
| | — |
|
| Securities purchased under resale agreements | | 1,956 |
| | 1,956 |
| | — |
| | 1,956 |
| | — |
| | 3,241 |
| | 3,241 |
| | — |
| | 3,241 |
| | — |
|
| Investment securities held-to-maturity | | 35,169 |
| | 34,994 |
| | 17,400 |
| | 17,439 |
| | 155 |
| | 40,458 |
| | 40,255 |
| | 16,814 |
| | 23,318 |
| | 123 |
|
Net loans (excluding leases) | | 18,862 |
| | 18,877 |
| | — |
| | 18,781 |
| | 96 |
| | 22,577 |
| | 22,482 |
| | — |
| | 22,431 |
| | 51 |
|
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-interest-bearing | | $ | 59,397 |
| | $ | 59,397 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 59,397 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 47,175 |
| | $ | 47,175 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 47,175 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest-bearing - U.S. | | 30,911 |
| | 30,911 |
| | — |
| | 30,911 |
| | — |
| | 50,139 |
| | 50,139 |
| | — |
| | 50,139 |
| | — |
|
| Interest-bearing - non-U.S. | | 96,855 |
| | 96,855 |
| | — |
| | 96,855 |
| | — |
| | 87,582 |
| | 87,582 |
| | — |
| | 87,582 |
| | — |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | | 4,400 |
| | 4,400 |
| | — |
| | 4,400 |
| | — |
| | 2,842 |
| | 2,842 |
| | — |
| | 2,842 |
| | — |
|
| Other short-term borrowings | | 1,585 |
| | 1,585 |
| | — |
| | 1,585 |
| | — |
| | 1,144 |
| | 1,144 |
| | — |
| | 1,144 |
| | — |
|
| Long-term debt | | 11,430 |
| | 11,618 |
| | — |
| | 11,282 |
| | 336 |
| | 11,620 |
| | 11,919 |
| | — |
| | 11,639 |
| | 280 |
|
State Street Corporation | 69
(1) Includes $3 million of loans classified as held-for-sale that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2017.
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 3. Investment Securities
Investment securities held by us are classified as either trading account assets, AFS, HTM or HTMequity securities held at fair value at the time of purchase and reassessed periodically, based on management’s intent.
As described in Note 1, upon adoption of ASU 2016-01 we reclassified approximately $397 million of money market funds and $46 million of equity securities to other assets, where they are held at fair value with changes to fair value recorded through our consolidated statement of income.
Generally, trading assets are debt and equity securities purchased in connection with our trading activities and, as such, are expected to be sold in the near term. Our trading activities typically involve active and frequent buying and selling with the objective of generating profits on short-term movements. AFS investment securities are those securities that we intend to hold for an indefinite period of time. AFS investment
securities include securities utilized as part of our asset-and-liabilityasset and liability management activities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment risk, liquidity needs or other factors. HTM securities are debt securities that management has the intent and the ability to hold to maturity.
Trading assets are carried at fair value. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses on trading assets are recorded in trading services revenue in our consolidated statement of income. Debt and marketable equityAFS securities classified as AFS are carried at fair value, and after-tax net unrealized gains and losses are recorded in AOCI. Gains or losses realized on sales of AFS investment securities are computed using the specific identification method and are recorded in gains (losses) related to investment securities, net, in our consolidated statement of income. HTM investment securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts.
State Street Corporation | 7063
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the amortized cost, fair value and associated unrealized gains and losses of AFS and HTM investment securities as of the dates indicated:
| | | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized | | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized | | Fair Value | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized | | Fair Value |
| (In millions) | Gains | | Losses | | Gains | | Losses | | Gains | | Losses | | Gains | | Losses | |
| Available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 617 |
| | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 620 |
| | $ | 4,265 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 4,263 |
| $ | 11 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 11 |
| | $ | 222 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 223 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 11,044 |
| | 51 |
| | 95 |
| | 11,000 |
| | 13,340 |
| | 76 |
| | 159 |
| | 13,257 |
| 16,158 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 287 |
|
| 15,893 |
| | 10,975 |
| | 26 |
| | 129 |
| | 10,872 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 16,169 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 287 |
|
| 15,904 |
| | 11,197 |
| | 28 |
| | 130 |
| | 11,095 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Student loans(1) | 4,795 |
| | 39 |
| | 8 |
| | 4,826 |
| | 5,659 |
| | 12 |
| | 75 |
| | 5,596 |
| 1,546 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 1,567 |
| | 3,325 |
| | 37 |
| | 4 |
| | 3,358 |
|
| Credit cards | 1,567 |
| | 3 |
| | 22 |
| | 1,548 |
| | 1,377 |
| | — |
| | 26 |
| | 1,351 |
| 639 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 617 |
| | 1,565 |
| | 2 |
| | 25 |
| | 1,542 |
|
| Sub-prime | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 289 |
| | 1 |
| | 18 |
| | 272 |
| |
Other(2) | 1,213 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 1,221 |
| | 895 |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | 905 |
| |
| CLOs | | 848 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 851 |
| | 1,440 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | 1,447 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 7,575 |
| | 50 |
| | 30 |
| | 7,595 |
| | 8,220 |
| | 23 |
| | 119 |
| | 8,124 |
| 3,033 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 3,035 |
| | 6,330 |
| | 46 |
| | 29 |
| | 6,347 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 7,041 |
| | 36 |
| | 3 |
| | 7,074 |
| | 6,506 |
| | 35 |
| | 6 |
| | 6,535 |
| 2,609 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 2,615 |
| | 6,664 |
| | 36 |
| | 5 |
| | 6,695 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 2,833 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 2,839 |
| | 2,513 |
| | 4 |
| | 1 |
| | 2,516 |
| 1,655 |
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| 1,657 |
| | 2,942 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | 2,947 |
|
| Government securities | 6,666 |
| | 8 |
| | 16 |
| | 6,658 |
| | 5,834 |
| | 8 |
| | 6 |
| | 5,836 |
| 13,089 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 13,072 |
| | 10,754 |
| | 16 |
| | 49 |
| | 10,721 |
|
Other(3)(2) | 5,783 |
| | 39 |
| | 4 |
| | 5,818 |
| | 5,587 |
| | 31 |
| | 5 |
| | 5,613 |
| 4,449 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 4,452 |
| | 6,076 |
| | 38 |
| | 6 |
| | 6,108 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 22,323 |
| | 89 |
| | 23 |
| | 22,389 |
| | 20,440 |
| | 78 |
| | 18 |
| | 20,500 |
| 21,802 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 66 |
|
| 21,796 |
| | 26,436 |
| | 95 |
| | 60 |
| | 26,471 |
|
State and political subdivisions | 9,444 |
| | 322 |
| | 28 |
| | 9,738 |
| | 10,233 |
| | 201 |
| | 112 |
| | 10,322 |
| 4,127 |
|
| 114 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 4,228 |
| | 8,929 |
| | 245 |
| | 23 |
| | 9,151 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,522 |
| | 15 |
| | 9 |
| | 1,528 |
| | 2,610 |
| | 18 |
| | 35 |
| | 2,593 |
| 325 |
|
| — |
|
| 6 |
|
| 319 |
| | 1,060 |
| | 3 |
| | 9 |
| | 1,054 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | 2,923 |
| | 20 |
| | 15 |
| | 2,928 |
| | 2,481 |
| | 18 |
| | 30 |
| | 2,469 |
| 2,104 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 2,066 |
| | 2,563 |
| | 12 |
| | 15 |
| | 2,560 |
|
U.S. equity securities | 40 |
| | 8 |
| | 2 |
| | 46 |
| | 39 |
| | 6 |
| | 3 |
| | 42 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 40 |
| | 8 |
| | 2 |
| | 46 |
|
| Non-U.S. equity securities | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| |
| U.S. money-market mutual funds | 394 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 394 |
| | 409 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 409 |
| |
| Non-U.S. money-market mutual funds | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16 |
| |
U.S. money-market mutual funds(4) | | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 397 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 397 |
|
| Total | $ | 55,882 |
| | $ | 559 |
| | $ | 203 |
| | $ | 56,238 |
| | $ | 62,056 |
| | $ | 427 |
| | $ | 485 |
| | $ | 61,998 |
| $ | 47,560 |
|
| $ | 228 |
|
| $ | 440 |
|
| $ | 47,348 |
| | $ | 56,952 |
| | $ | 437 |
| | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 57,121 |
|
| Held-to-maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 17,456 |
| | $ | 20 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 17,439 |
| | $ | 17,527 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 58 |
| | $ | 17,486 |
| $ | 15,992 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 292 |
|
| $ | 15,700 |
| | $ | 17,028 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 143 |
| | $ | 16,885 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 12,375 |
| | 38 |
| | 169 |
| | 12,244 |
| | 10,334 |
| | 20 |
| | 221 |
| | 10,133 |
| 17,443 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 652 |
|
| 16,792 |
| | 16,651 |
| | 22 |
| | 225 |
| | 16,448 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 33,435 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 944 |
|
| 32,492 |
| | 33,679 |
| | 22 |
| | 368 |
| | 33,333 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Student loans(1) | 3,116 |
| | 25 |
| | 13 |
| | 3,128 |
| | 2,883 |
| | 5 |
| | 30 |
| | 2,858 |
| 2,892 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 2,928 |
| | 3,047 |
| | 32 |
| | 9 |
| | 3,070 |
|
| Credit cards | 798 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 801 |
| | 897 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 899 |
| 710 |
|
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| 711 |
| | 798 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 800 |
|
| Other | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35 |
| 1 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 3,915 |
| | 28 |
| | 13 |
| | 3,930 |
| | 3,815 |
| | 7 |
| | 30 |
| | 3,792 |
| 3,603 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 3,640 |
| | 3,846 |
| | 34 |
| | 9 |
| | 3,871 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 1,000 |
| | 84 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,077 |
| | 1,150 |
| | 70 |
| | 15 |
| | 1,205 |
| 727 |
|
| 82 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 804 |
| | 939 |
| | 82 |
| | 6 |
| | 1,015 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 325 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 326 |
| | 531 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 531 |
| 231 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 231 |
| | 263 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 264 |
|
| Government securities | 483 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 485 |
| | 286 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | 289 |
| 404 |
|
| 2 |
|
| — |
|
| 406 |
| | 474 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 476 |
|
| Other | 47 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47 |
| | 113 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 114 |
| 47 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 47 |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 48 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 1,855 |
| | 87 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,935 |
| | 2,080 |
| | 74 |
| | 15 |
| | 2,139 |
| 1,409 |
|
| 84 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 1,488 |
| | 1,724 |
| | 85 |
| | 6 |
| | 1,803 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,249 |
| | 44 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,288 |
| | 1,413 |
| | 42 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,444 |
| 1,147 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 1,185 |
| | 1,209 |
| | 45 |
| | 6 |
| | 1,248 |
|
| Total | $ | 36,850 |
| | $ | 217 |
| | $ | 231 |
| | $ | 36,836 |
| | $ | 35,169 |
| | $ | 160 |
| | $ | 335 |
| | $ | 34,994 |
| $ | 39,594 |
|
| $ | 175 |
|
| $ | 964 |
|
| $ | 38,805 |
| | $ | 40,458 |
| | $ | 186 |
| | $ | 389 |
| | $ | 40,255 |
|
(1) Primarily composed of securities guaranteed by the federal government with respect to at least 97% of defaulted principal and accrued interest on the underlying loans.
(2) As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of other ABS was primarily composed of $1,221 million and $905 million, respectively, of CLOs.
(3) As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, the fair value of other non-U.S. debt securities was primarily composed of $3,600$1,959 million and $3,769$3,537 million, respectively, of covered bonds and $1,503$1,735 million and $988$1,885 million, asrespectively, of Septembercorporate bonds.
(3) As of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, respectively,2017, the fair value of corporate bonds.State and Political subdivisions includes securities in trusts of $1,207 million and $1,247 million, respectively. Additional information about these trusts is provided in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
(4) During the first quarter of 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-01. For additional information see Note 1.
State Street Corporation | 7164
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Aggregate investment securities with carrying values of approximately $52$33 billion and $46$48 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, were designated as pledged for public and trust deposits, short-term borrowings and for other purposes as provided by law.
In the first quarter of 2017,six months ended June 30, 2018, we sold $2.7approximately $16 billion of AFS, primarily Agency MBSasset-backed securities, municipal bonds and U.S. Treasury securities in our investment portfolio, in response to the current interest rate environmentcovered bonds, resulting in a net pre-tax lossgain of $40approximately $8 million.
The following tables present the aggregate fair values of AFS and HTM investment securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months, and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer, as of the dates indicated:
| | | | Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total | Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total |
| September 30, 2017 | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
| June 30, 2018 | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
| (In millions) | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
| Available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 1 |
| |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 4,382 |
| | 51 |
| | 1,880 |
| | 44 |
| | 6,262 |
| | 95 |
| $ | 7,776 |
| | $ | 136 |
| | $ | 3,030 |
| | $ | 151 |
| | $ | 10,806 |
| | $ | 287 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 7,776 |
| | 136 |
| | 3,030 |
| | 151 |
| | 10,806 |
| | 287 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | — |
| | — |
| | 1,191 |
| | 8 |
| | 1,191 |
| | 8 |
| 309 |
| | 1 |
| | 192 |
| | — |
| | 501 |
| | 1 |
|
| Credit cards | 499 |
| | 22 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 499 |
| | 22 |
| 491 |
| | 23 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 491 |
| | 23 |
|
| CLOs | | 326 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 326 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 499 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 1,191 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 1,690 |
|
| 30 |
| 1,126 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 192 |
|
| — |
|
| 1,318 |
|
| 25 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 780 |
| | 2 |
| | 569 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,349 |
| | 3 |
| 756 |
| | 2 |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| | 819 |
| | 2 |
|
| Government securities | 4,965 |
| | 16 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,965 |
| | 16 |
| 6,216 |
| | 48 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,216 |
| | 48 |
|
| Other | 447 |
| | 3 |
| | 229 |
| | 1 |
| | 676 |
| | 4 |
| 1,254 |
| | 15 |
| | 56 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,310 |
| | 16 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 6,192 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 798 |
|
| 2 |
|
| 6,990 |
|
| 23 |
| 8,226 |
|
| 65 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 8,345 |
|
| 66 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | 1,052 |
| | 15 |
| | 525 |
| | 13 |
| | 1,577 |
| | 28 |
| 563 |
| | 7 |
| | 233 |
| | 6 |
| | 796 |
| | 13 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 550 |
| | 7 |
| | 56 |
| | 2 |
| | 606 |
| | 9 |
| 232 |
| | 4 |
| | 70 |
| | 2 |
| | 302 |
| | 6 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | 1,141 |
| | 14 |
| | 75 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,216 |
| | 15 |
| 1,382 |
| | 36 |
| | 113 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,495 |
| | 43 |
|
| U.S. equity securities | — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | 2 |
| | 6 |
| | 2 |
| |
| Total | $ | 13,816 |
| | $ | 130 |
| | $ | 4,684 |
| | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 18,500 |
| | $ | 203 |
| $ | 19,305 |
| | $ | 273 |
| | $ | 3,757 |
| | $ | 167 |
| | $ | 23,062 |
| | $ | 440 |
|
| Held-to-maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 9,660 |
| | $ | 36 |
| | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 9,737 |
| | $ | 37 |
| $ | 12,528 |
| | $ | 246 |
| | $ | 3,172 |
| | $ | 46 |
| | $ | 15,700 |
| | $ | 292 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 6,939 |
| | 152 |
| | 493 |
| | 17 |
| | 7,432 |
| | 169 |
| 11,090 |
| | 320 |
| | 5,606 |
| | 332 |
| | 16,696 |
| | 652 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 23,618 |
| | 566 |
| | 8,778 |
| | 378 |
| | 32,396 |
| | 944 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
| | | | | | | | |
|
| |
|
|
| Student loans | 544 |
| | 8 |
| | 389 |
| | 5 |
| | 933 |
| | 13 |
| 99 |
| | 1 |
| | 559 |
| | 7 |
| | 658 |
| | 8 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 544 |
| | 8 |
| | 389 |
| | 5 |
|
| 933 |
|
| 13 |
| 99 |
| | 1 |
| | 559 |
| | 7 |
|
| 658 |
|
| 8 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
| | — |
| | 259 |
| | 7 |
| | 259 |
| | 7 |
| 93 |
| | 1 |
| | 133 |
| | 4 |
| | 226 |
| | 5 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | — |
|
| — |
|
| 259 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 259 |
|
| 7 |
| 93 |
|
| 1 |
|
| 133 |
|
| 4 |
|
| 226 |
|
| 5 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 245 |
| | 2 |
| | 176 |
| | 3 |
| | 421 |
| | 5 |
| 2 |
| | — |
| | 238 |
| | 7 |
| | 240 |
| | 7 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,388 |
|
| $ | 198 |
|
| $ | 1,394 |
|
| $ | 33 |
|
| $ | 18,782 |
|
| $ | 231 |
| $ | 23,812 |
|
| $ | 568 |
|
| $ | 9,708 |
|
| $ | 396 |
|
| $ | 33,520 |
|
| $ | 964 |
|
State Street Corporation | 7265
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total | Less than 12 months | | 12 months or longer | | Total |
| December 31, 2016 | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
| December 31, 2017 | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
| (In millions) | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | |
| Available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 651 |
| | $ | 8 |
| | $ | 180 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 831 |
| | $ | 9 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 67 |
| | $ | 1 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 7,072 |
| | 131 |
| | 1,114 |
| | 28 |
| | 8,186 |
| | 159 |
| 5,161 |
| | 31 |
| | 3,341 |
| | 98 |
| | 8,502 |
| | 129 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 5,161 |
| | 31 |
| | 3,408 |
| | 99 |
| | 8,569 |
| | 130 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | 54 |
| | — |
| | 3,745 |
| | 75 |
| | 3,799 |
| | 75 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 769 |
| | 4 |
| | 769 |
| | 4 |
|
| Credit cards | 795 |
| | 1 |
| | 494 |
| | 25 |
| | 1,289 |
| | 26 |
| 1,289 |
| | 25 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,289 |
| | 25 |
|
| Sub-prime | 1 |
| | — |
| | 252 |
| | 18 |
| | 253 |
| | 18 |
| |
| Other | 75 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 75 |
| | — |
| |
| Total asset-backed securities | 925 |
| | 1 |
| | 4,491 |
| | 118 |
| | 5,416 |
| | 119 |
| 1,289 |
| | 25 |
| | 769 |
| | 4 |
| | 2,058 |
| | 29 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 442 |
| | 1 |
| | 893 |
| | 5 |
| | 1,335 |
| | 6 |
| 1,059 |
| | 4 |
| | 469 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,528 |
| | 5 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 253 |
| | — |
| | 276 |
| | 1 |
| | 529 |
| | 1 |
| |
| Government securities | 1,314 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,314 |
| | 6 |
| 7,629 |
| | 48 |
| | 68 |
| | 1 |
| | 7,697 |
| | 49 |
|
| Other | 670 |
| | 4 |
| | 218 |
| | 1 |
| | 888 |
| | 5 |
| 816 |
| | 4 |
| | 289 |
| | 2 |
| | 1,105 |
| | 6 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 2,679 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,387 |
| | 7 |
| | 4,066 |
| | 18 |
| 9,504 |
| | 56 |
| | 826 |
| | 4 |
| | 10,330 |
| | 60 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | 3,390 |
| | 102 |
| | 304 |
| | 10 |
| | 3,694 |
| | 112 |
| 734 |
| | 6 |
| | 901 |
| | 17 |
| | 1,635 |
| | 23 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 1,259 |
| | 31 |
| | 162 |
| | 4 |
| | 1,421 |
| | 35 |
| 399 |
| | 5 |
| | 136 |
| | 4 |
| | 535 |
| | 9 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | 944 |
| | 24 |
| | 157 |
| | 6 |
| | 1,101 |
| | 30 |
| 1,007 |
| | 8 |
| | 345 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,352 |
| | 15 |
|
| U.S. equity securities | 8 |
| | — |
| | 5 |
| | 3 |
| | 13 |
| | 3 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 6 |
| | 2 |
| | 6 |
| | 2 |
|
| Total | $ | 16,928 |
| | $ | 308 |
| | $ | 7,800 |
| | $ | 177 |
| | $ | 24,728 |
| | $ | 485 |
| $ | 18,094 |
| | $ | 131 |
| | $ | 6,391 |
| | $ | 137 |
| | $ | 24,485 |
| | $ | 268 |
|
| Held-to-maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 8,891 |
| | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 86 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | $ | 8,977 |
| | $ | 58 |
| $ | 14,439 |
| | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 2,447 |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | 16,886 |
| | $ | 143 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 6,838 |
| | 221 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,838 |
| | 221 |
| 6,785 |
| | 38 |
| | 5,988 |
| | 187 |
| | 12,773 |
| | 225 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 21,224 |
| | 147 |
| | 8,435 |
| | 221 |
| | 29,659 |
| | 368 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Student loans | 705 |
| | 9 |
| | 1,235 |
| | 21 |
| | 1,940 |
| | 30 |
| 440 |
| | 3 |
| | 423 |
| | 6 |
| | 863 |
| | 9 |
|
| Credit cards | 33 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| |
| Other | 18 |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | 27 |
| | — |
| |
| Total asset-backed securities | 756 |
| | 9 |
| | 1,244 |
| | 21 |
| | 2,000 |
| | 30 |
| 440 |
| | 3 |
| | 423 |
| | 6 |
| | 863 |
| | 9 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mortgage-backed securities | 54 |
| | 2 |
| | 330 |
| | 13 |
| | 384 |
| | 15 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 239 |
| | 6 |
| | 239 |
| | 6 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 28 |
| | — |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | 63 |
| | — |
| |
| Government securities | 180 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 180 |
| | — |
| |
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 262 |
| | 2 |
| | 365 |
| | 13 |
| | 627 |
| | 15 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 239 |
| | 6 |
| | 239 |
| | 6 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 537 |
| | 4 |
| | 204 |
| | 7 |
| | 741 |
| | 11 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 276 |
| | 6 |
| | 276 |
| | 6 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,284 |
| | $ | 293 |
| | $ | 1,899 |
| | $ | 42 |
| | $ | 19,183 |
| | $ | 335 |
| $ | 21,664 |
| | $ | 150 |
| | $ | 9,373 |
| | $ | 239 |
| | $ | 31,037 |
| | $ | 389 |
|
State Street Corporation | 7366
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents contractual maturities of debt investment securities by carrying amount as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018. The maturities of certain ABS, MBS, and collateralized mortgage obligationsCMOs are based on expected principal payments. Actual maturities may differ from these expected maturities since certain borrowers have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
| | | | Under 1 Year | | 1 to 5 Years | | 6 to 10 Years | | Over 10 Years | | Total | |
| June 30, 2018 | | Under 1 Year | | 1 to 5 Years | | 6 to 10 Years | | Over 10 Years | | Total |
| (In millions) | Under 1 Year | | 1 to 5 Years | | 6 to 10 Years | | Over 10 Years | | Total | |
| Available-for-sale: | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 326 |
| | $ | 620 |
| $ | 11 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 11 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 270 |
| | 1,311 |
| | 3,424 |
| | 5,995 |
| | 11,000 |
| 105 |
| | 621 |
| | 2,708 |
| | 12,459 |
| | 15,893 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 116 |
| | 621 |
| | 2,708 |
| | 12,459 |
| | 15,904 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Student loans | 408 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 1,159 |
| | 1,625 |
| | 4,826 |
| 56 |
| | 366 |
| | 457 |
| | 688 |
| | 1,567 |
|
| Credit cards | — |
| | 1,296 |
| | 252 |
| | — |
| | 1,548 |
| — |
| | 491 |
| | 126 |
| | — |
| | 617 |
|
| Other | — |
| | 120 |
| | 1,101 |
| | — |
| | 1,221 |
| |
| CLOs | | 100 |
| | 589 |
| | 142 |
| | 20 |
| | 851 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 408 |
| | 3,050 |
| | 2,512 |
| | 1,625 |
| | 7,595 |
| 156 |
| | 1,446 |
| | 725 |
| | 708 |
| | 3,035 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 837 |
|
| 4,128 |
|
| 1,046 |
|
| 1,063 |
| | 7,074 |
| 223 |
|
| 1,807 |
|
| 195 |
|
| 390 |
| | 2,615 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 395 |
|
| 2,182 |
|
| 262 |
|
| — |
| | 2,839 |
| 155 |
|
| 712 |
|
| 650 |
|
| 140 |
| | 1,657 |
|
| Government securities | 3,000 |
|
| 2,288 |
|
| 1,370 |
|
| — |
| | 6,658 |
| 2,279 |
|
| 4,422 |
|
| 6,103 |
|
| 268 |
| | 13,072 |
|
| Other | 1,485 |
|
| 3,607 |
|
| 726 |
|
| — |
| | 5,818 |
| 1,232 |
|
| 2,478 |
|
| 705 |
|
| 37 |
| | 4,452 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 5,717 |
| | 12,205 |
| | 3,404 |
| | 1,063 |
| | 22,389 |
| 3,889 |
| | 9,419 |
| | 7,653 |
| | 835 |
| | 21,796 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | 433 |
|
| 2,525 |
|
| 5,020 |
|
| 1,760 |
| | 9,738 |
| 406 |
|
| 1,284 |
|
| 1,786 |
|
| 752 |
| | 4,228 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 7 |
|
| 148 |
|
| 343 |
|
| 1,030 |
| | 1,528 |
| — |
|
| 16 |
|
| — |
|
| 303 |
| | 319 |
|
| Other U.S. debt securities | 404 |
|
| 1,052 |
|
| 1,472 |
|
| — |
| | 2,928 |
| 76 |
|
| 1,281 |
|
| 709 |
|
| — |
| | 2,066 |
|
| Total | $ | 7,471 |
| | $ | 20,298 |
| | $ | 16,230 |
| | $ | 11,799 |
| | $ | 55,798 |
| $ | 4,643 |
| | $ | 14,067 |
| | $ | 13,581 |
| | $ | 15,057 |
| | $ | 47,348 |
|
| Held-to-maturity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Direct obligations | $ | 1,827 |
|
| $ | 15,552 |
|
| $ | 14 |
|
| $ | 63 |
| | $ | 17,456 |
| $ | 3,205 |
|
| $ | 12,725 |
|
| $ | 13 |
|
| $ | 49 |
| | $ | 15,992 |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | — |
|
| 172 |
|
| 1,427 |
|
| 10,776 |
| | 12,375 |
| 10 |
|
| 185 |
|
| 1,467 |
|
| 15,781 |
| | 17,443 |
|
| Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | | 3,215 |
| | 12,910 |
| | 1,480 |
| | 15,830 |
| | 33,435 |
|
| Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Student loans | 87 |
|
| 240 |
|
| 298 |
|
| 2,491 |
| | 3,116 |
| 32 |
|
| 276 |
|
| 226 |
|
| 2,358 |
| | 2,892 |
|
| Credit cards | 178 |
|
| 620 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 798 |
| 173 |
|
| 537 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 710 |
|
| Other | — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | 1 |
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| 1 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total asset-backed securities | 265 |
| | 860 |
| | 298 |
| | 2,492 |
| | 3,915 |
| 205 |
| | 813 |
| | 226 |
| | 2,359 |
| | 3,603 |
|
| Non-U.S. debt securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Mortgage-backed securities | 173 |
|
| 221 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 557 |
| | 1,000 |
| 94 |
|
| 140 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 472 |
| | 727 |
|
| Asset-backed securities | 84 |
|
| 241 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 325 |
| — |
|
| 231 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 231 |
|
| Government securities | 364 |
|
| 119 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 483 |
| 287 |
|
| 117 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 404 |
|
| Other | — |
|
| 47 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 47 |
| 47 |
|
| — |
|
| — |
|
| — |
| | 47 |
|
| Total non-U.S. debt securities | 621 |
| | 628 |
| | 49 |
| | 557 |
| | 1,855 |
| 428 |
| | 488 |
| | 21 |
| | 472 |
| | 1,409 |
|
| Collateralized mortgage obligations | 9 |
|
| 117 |
|
| 373 |
|
| 750 |
| | 1,249 |
| 5 |
|
| 418 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 675 |
| | 1,147 |
|
| Total | $ | 2,722 |
| | $ | 17,329 |
| | $ | 2,161 |
| | $ | 14,638 |
| | $ | 36,850 |
| $ | 3,853 |
| | $ | 14,629 |
| | $ | 1,776 |
| | $ | 19,336 |
| | $ | 39,594 |
|
State Street Corporation | 7467
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents a roll-forward with respect to net impairment losses that have been recognized in income for the periods indicated. | | | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Balance, beginning of period | | $ | 66 |
| | $ | 92 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 66 |
|
| Additions: | | | | | | | | |
| Losses for which OTTI was previously recognized | | — |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
|
| Deductions: | | | | | | | | |
| Previously recognized losses related to securities sold or matured | | (2 | ) | | (26 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
| Balance, end of period | | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 65 |
| | $ | 64 |
|
Interest income related to debt securities is recognized in our consolidated statement of income using the effective interest method, or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the contractual or estimated life of the security. The level rate of return considers any non-refundable fees or costs, as well as purchase premiums or discounts, resulting in amortization or accretion, accordingly.
For debt securities acquired for which we consider it probable as of the date of acquisition that we will be unable to collect all contractually required principal, interest and other payments, the excess of our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows from these securities over their initial recorded investment is accreted into interest income on a level-yield basis over the securities’ estimated remaining terms. Subsequent decreases in these securities’ expected future cash flows are either recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the yields on the securities over their remaining terms, or are evaluated for other-than-temporary impairment. Increases in expected future cash flows are recognized prospectively over the securities’ estimated remaining terms through the recalculation of their yields.
For certain debt securities acquired which are considered to be beneficial interests in securitized financial assets, the excess of our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows from these securities over their initial recorded investment is accreted into interest income on a level-yield basis over the securities’ estimated remaining terms. Subsequent decreases in these securities’ expected future cash flows are either recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the yields on the securities over their remaining terms, or are evaluated for OTTI. Increases in expected future cash flows are recognized prospectively over the securities’ estimated remaining terms through the recalculation of their yields.
Impairment
We conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether OTTI exists. For additional information about the review of securities for impairment, refer to pages 149 to 152144 to146 in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
We recorded approximately $1 million of OTTI in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, and less than $1 million of OTTI in both of the nine months ended September 30,same periods in 2017, and $2 million of OTTI in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which resulted from adverse changes in the timing of expected future cash flows from the securities.
After a review of the investment portfolio, taking into consideration current economic conditions, adverse situations that might affect our ability to fully collect principal and interest, the timing of future payments, the credit quality and performance of the
collateral underlying MBS and ABS and other relevant factors, management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the investment securities portfolio and the resulting gross pre-tax unrealized losses of $434$1,404 million related to 1,1511,118 securities as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 to be temporary, and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities.
Note 4. Loans and Leases
We segregate our loans and leases into three segments: commercial and financial loans, commercial real estate loans and lease financing. We further classify commercial and financial loans as loans to investment funds, senior secured bank loans, loans to municipalities and other. These classifications reflect their risk characteristics, their initial measurement attributes and the methods we use to monitor and assess credit risk. For additional information on our loans and leases, including our internal risk-rating system used to assess our risk of credit loss for each loan or lease, refer to pages 152147 to 155149 in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
State Street Corporation | 75
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents our recorded investment in loans and leases, by segment, as of the dates indicated:
| | | (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Domestic: | | | | | | |
| Commercial and financial: | | | | | | |
| Loans to investment funds | $ | 12,886 |
| | $ | 11,734 |
| $ | 13,359 |
| | $ | 13,618 |
|
| Senior secured bank loans | 3,377 |
| | 3,256 |
| 3,053 |
| | 2,923 |
|
| Loans to municipalities | 1,955 |
| | 1,352 |
| 1,773 |
| | 2,105 |
|
| Other | 55 |
| | 70 |
| 42 |
| | 50 |
|
| Commercial real estate | — |
| | 27 |
| 285 |
| | 98 |
|
| Lease financing | 283 |
| | 338 |
| 78 |
| | 267 |
|
| Total domestic | 18,556 |
| | 16,777 |
| 18,590 |
| | 19,061 |
|
| Non-U.S.: | | | | | | |
| Commercial and financial: | | | | | | |
| Loans to investment funds | 4,138 |
| | 2,224 |
| 4,535 |
| | 3,213 |
|
| Senior secured bank loans | 514 |
| | 252 |
| 646 |
| | 624 |
|
| Lease financing | 430 |
| | 504 |
| 353 |
| | 396 |
|
| Total non-U.S. | 5,082 |
| | 2,980 |
| 5,534 |
| | 4,233 |
|
| Total loans and leases | 23,638 |
| | 19,757 |
| 24,124 |
| | 23,294 |
|
| Allowance for loan and lease losses | (57 | ) | | (53 | ) | (55 | ) | | (54 | ) |
| Loans and leases, net of allowance | $ | 23,581 |
| | $ | 19,704 |
| $ | 24,069 |
| | $ | 23,240 |
|
The commercial and financial segment is composed of primarily floating-rate loans to mutual fund clients, purchased senior secured bank loans and loans to municipalities. Investment fund lending is composed of short-duration revolving credit lines providing liquidity to fund clients in support of their transaction flows associated with securities' settlement activities.
State Street Corporation | 68
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Certain loans are pledged as collateral for access to the Federal Reserve's discount window. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the loans pledged as collateral totaled $1.7$5.2 billion and $1.5$1.9 billion, respectively.
The following tables present our recorded investment in each class of loans and leases by credit quality indicator as of the dates indicated:
| | | September 30, 2017 | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases | |
| June 30, 2018 | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases |
| (In millions) | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases |
Investment grade(1) | $ | 18,182 |
| | $ | 285 |
| | $ | 430 |
| | $ | 18,897 |
|
Speculative(2) | 4,655 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,655 |
| 5,227 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,227 |
|
Total | $ | 22,925 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 713 |
| | $ | 23,638 |
| $ | 23,409 |
| | $ | 285 |
| | $ | 430 |
| | $ | 24,124 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2016 | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases |
| (In millions) |
Investment grade(1) | $ | 14,889 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 842 |
| | $ | 15,758 |
|
Speculative(2) | 3,984 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,984 |
|
Substandard(3) | 15 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15 |
|
| Total | $ | 18,888 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 842 |
| | $ | 19,757 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2017 | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases |
| (In millions) |
Investment grade(1) | $ | 17,866 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | 663 |
| | $ | 18,627 |
|
Speculative(2) | 4,638 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,638 |
|
Special mention(3) | 29 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 29 |
|
Total(4) | $ | 22,533 |
| | $ | 98 |
| | $ | 663 |
| | $ | 23,294 |
|
(1)Investment-grade loans and leases consist of counterparties with strong credit quality and low expected credit risk and probability of default. Ratings apply to counterparties with a strong capacity to support the timely repayment of any financial commitment.
(2) Speculative loans and leases consist of counterparties that face ongoing uncertainties or exposure to business, financial, or economic downturns. However, these counterparties may have financial flexibility or access to financial alternatives, which allow for financial commitments to be met.
(3) SubstandardSpecial mention loans and leases consist of counterparties with well-definedpotential weakness that, jeopardizesif uncorrected, may result in deterioration of repayment with the possibility we will sustain some loss.prospects.
State Street Corporation | 76
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents our recorded investment in loans and leases, disaggregated based on our impairment methodology, as of the dates indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (In millions) | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases | | Commercial and Financial | | Commercial Real Estate | | Lease Financing | | Total Loans and Leases |
Loans and leases(1): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15 |
|
| Collectively evaluated for impairment | 22,925 |
| | — |
| | 713 |
| | 23,638 |
| | 18,873 |
| | 27 |
| | 842 |
| | 19,742 |
|
| Total | $ | 22,925 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 713 |
| | $ | 23,638 |
| | $ | 18,888 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 842 |
| | $ | 19,757 |
|
(1)(4) For those portfolios where there are a small number of loans each with a large balance, we review each loan annually for indicators of impairment. For those loans where no such indicators are identified, the loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017, no loans were individually evaluated for impairment. As of2018 and December 31, 2016, $0.2 million2017, there were no indicators of the allowance for loan and lease loss related to commercial and financial loans were individually evaluated for impairment.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had no impaired loans and leases. As of December 31, 2016, we identified one commercialleases, no loans or leases on non-accrual status and financial loan as impaired, with both a recorded investment and unpaid principal balance of $15 million. The impaired loan had zero related interest income and an associated allowance for loan losses of $0.2 million.no loans or leases 90 days or more contractually past due.
In certain circumstances, we restructure troubled loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Once restructured, the loans are generally considered impaired until their maturity, regardless of whether the borrowers perform under the modified terms of the loans. There were no loans modified in troubled debt restructurings during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and the year ended December 31, 2016.2017.
As of September 30, 2017, there were no loans or leases on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2016, there was one commercial and financial loan on non-accrual status and no CRE loans or leases were on non-accrual status. There were no loans and leases 90 days or more contractually past due as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Allowance for loan and lease losses
The following table presents activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the periods indicated:
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | Total Loans and Leases | | Total Loans and Leases | 2018 | | 2017 |
Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | | | Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | | |
| Beginning balance | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 51 |
| $ | 54 |
| | $ | 51 |
|
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 3 |
| | — |
| 2 |
| | 3 |
|
| Charge-offs | — |
| | — |
| (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 51 |
| $ | 55 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| (In millions) | Total Loans and Leases | | Total Loans and Leases | 2018 | | 2017 |
Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | | | Allowance for loan and lease losses(1): | | |
| Beginning balance | $ | 53 |
| | $ | 46 |
| $ | 54 |
| | $ | 53 |
|
| Provision for loan and lease losses | 4 |
| | 8 |
| 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Charge-offs | — |
| | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | | — |
|
| Ending balance | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 51 |
| $ | 55 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
(1) The provisions and charge-offs for loans and leases were attributable to exposure to senior secured loans to non-investment grade borrowers, purchased in connection with our participation in syndicated loans. Loans and leases are reviewed on a regular basis, and any provisions for loan and lease losses that are recorded reflect management's estimate of the amount necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level considered appropriate to absorb estimated incurred losses in the loan and lease portfolio.
State Street Corporation | 7769
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the periods indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| Goodwill: | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2016 | $ | 5,641 |
| | $ | 30 |
| | $ | 5,671 |
|
Acquisitions(1) | — |
| | 236 |
| | 236 |
|
| Divestitures and other reductions | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation | (80 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (82 | ) |
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | $ | 5,550 |
| | $ | 264 |
| | $ | 5,814 |
|
| Acquisitions | 17 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
|
| Divestitures and other reductions | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (9 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation | 170 |
| | 5 |
| | 175 |
|
| Ending balance September 30, 2017 | $ | 5,728 |
| | $ | 269 |
| | $ | 5,997 |
|
(1) Investment Management includes our acquisition of GEAM on July 1, 2016. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| Goodwill: | | | | | |
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | $ | 5,550 |
| | $ | 264 |
| | $ | 5,814 |
|
| Acquisitions | 17 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
|
| Divestitures and other reductions | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (9 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation | 194 |
| | 6 |
| | 200 |
|
| Ending balance December 31, 2017 | 5,752 |
| | 270 |
| | 6,022 |
|
| Foreign currency translation | (47 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (49 | ) |
| Ending balance June 30, 2018 | $ | 5,705 |
| | $ | 268 |
| | $ | 5,973 |
|
The following table presents changes in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during the periods indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| Other intangible assets: | | | | | |
| Beginning balance January 1, 2016 | $ | 1,753 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 1,768 |
|
Acquisitions(1) | — |
| | 217 |
| | 217 |
|
| Divestitures | (8 | ) | | — |
| | (8 | ) |
| Amortization | (186 | ) | | (21 | ) | | (207 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation and other, net | (20 | ) | | — |
| | (20 | ) |
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | $ | 1,539 |
| | $ | 211 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
|
| Acquisitions | 16 |
| | — |
| | 16 |
|
| Divestitures | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Amortization | (137 | ) | | (23 | ) | | (160 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation and other, net | 63 |
| | — |
| | 63 |
|
| Ending balance September 30, 2017 | $ | 1,470 |
| | $ | 188 |
| | $ | 1,658 |
|
(1) Investment Management includes our acquisition of GEAM on July 1, 2016. |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| Other intangible assets: | | | | | |
| Ending balance December 31, 2016 | $ | 1,539 |
| | $ | 211 |
| | $ | 1,750 |
|
| Acquisitions | 16 |
| | — |
| | 16 |
|
| Divestitures | (11 | ) | | — |
| | (11 | ) |
| Amortization | (183 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (214 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation and other, net | 71 |
| | 1 |
| | 72 |
|
| Ending balance December 31, 2017 | 1,432 |
| | 181 |
| | 1,613 |
|
| Amortization | (83 | ) | | (15 | ) | | (98 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation and other, net | (15 | ) | | — |
| | (15 | ) |
| Ending balance June 30, 2018 | $ | 1,334 |
| | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 1,500 |
|
The following table presents the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net carrying amount of other intangible assets by type as of the dates indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (In millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Other intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Client relationships | $ | 2,654 |
| | $ | (1,418 | ) | | $ | 1,236 |
| | $ | 2,620 |
| | $ | (1,306 | ) | | $ | 1,314 |
|
| Core deposits | 683 |
| | (311 | ) | | 372 |
| | 661 |
| | (277 | ) | | 384 |
|
| Other | 141 |
| | (91 | ) | | 50 |
| | 132 |
| | (80 | ) | | 52 |
|
| Total | $ | 3,478 |
| | $ | (1,820 | ) | | $ | 1,658 |
| | $ | 3,413 |
| | $ | (1,663 | ) | | $ | 1,750 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount | | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Other intangible assets: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Client relationships | $ | 2,633 |
| | $ | (1,521 | ) | | $ | 1,112 |
| | $ | 2,669 |
| | $ | (1,470 | ) | | $ | 1,199 |
|
| Core deposits | 681 |
| | (335 | ) | | 346 |
| | 686 |
| | (320 | ) | | 366 |
|
| Other | 136 |
| | (94 | ) | | 42 |
| | 142 |
| | (94 | ) | | 48 |
|
| Total | $ | 3,450 |
| | $ | (1,950 | ) | | $ | 1,500 |
| | $ | 3,497 |
| | $ | (1,884 | ) | | $ | 1,613 |
|
State Street Corporation | 7870
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 6. Other Assets
The following table presents the components of other assets as of the dates indicated: | | | (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
Receivable - securities lending(1) | $ | 23,628 |
| | $ | 21,204 |
| |
Securities borrowed(1) | | $ | 22,789 |
| | $ | 19,404 |
|
| Derivative instruments, net | 4,712 |
| | 7,321 |
| 6,151 |
| | 4,013 |
|
| Bank-owned life insurance | 3,219 |
| | 3,158 |
| 3,285 |
| | 3,242 |
|
Investments in joint ventures and other unconsolidated entities | 2,099 |
| | 2,363 |
| 2,791 |
| | 2,259 |
|
| Collateral, net | 902 |
| | 2,236 |
| 2,263 |
| | 473 |
|
| Receivable for securities settlement | | 813 |
| | 188 |
|
| Prepaid expenses | | 425 |
| | 364 |
|
| Accounts receivable | 393 |
| | 886 |
| 339 |
| | 348 |
|
| Prepaid expenses | 422 |
| | 333 |
| |
| Receivable for securities settlement | 441 |
| | 40 |
| |
| Deposits with clearing organizations | | 131 |
| | 120 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance(2)(3) | | 109 |
| | 113 |
|
| Income taxes receivable | 368 |
| | 106 |
| 44 |
| | 97 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance(2)(3) | 213 |
| | 210 |
| |
| Deposits with clearing organizations | 125 |
| | 132 |
| |
Other(3)(4) | 435 |
| | 339 |
| 414 |
| | 397 |
|
| Total | $ | 36,957 |
| | $ | 38,328 |
| $ | 39,554 |
| | $ | 31,018 |
|
(1) Refer to Note 8 for further information on the impact of collateral on our financial statement presentation of securities borrowing and securities lending transactions.
(2) Includes certain equity securities held at fair value through profit and loss that were transferred from AFS as part of our adoption of ASU 2016-01. Refer to Note 1 for further information on this new accounting standard.
(3) Deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded in our consolidated statement of condition are netted within the same tax jurisdiction.
(3)(4) Includes amounts held in escrow accounts at third parties related to the negotiated settlements in the transition management legal matter presented in Note 10.
Note 7. Derivative Financial Instruments
We use derivative financial instruments to support our clients' needs and to manage our interest-rate and currency risk. In undertaking these activities, we assume positions in both the foreign exchange and interest-rate markets by buying and selling cash instruments and using derivative financial instruments, including foreign exchange forward contracts, foreign exchange options and interest-rate contracts. For information on our derivative instruments, including the related accounting policies, refer to pages 160153 to 166159 in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Derivative financial instruments are also subject to credit and counterparty risk, which we manage by performing credit reviews, maintaining individual counterparty limits, entering into netting arrangements and requiring the receipt of collateral. Cash collateral received from and provided to counterparties in connection with derivative financial instruments is recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities and other assets, respectively, in our consolidated statement of condition. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we had recorded approximately $1.18$3.23 billion and $1.99$2.55 billion, respectively, of cash
collateral received from counterparties and approximately $1.85$5.06 billion and
$4.39 billion, $869 million, respectively, of cash collateral provided to counterparties in connection with derivative financial instruments in our consolidated statement of condition.
Certain of our derivative assets and liabilities as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 are subject to master netting agreements with our derivative counterparties. Certain of these agreements contain credit risk-related contingent features in which the counterparty has the right to declare us in default and accelerate cash settlement of our net derivative liabilities with the counterparty in the event that our credit rating falls below specified levels. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 totaled approximately $1.94$2.27 billion, against which we provided no$85 million in underlying collateral. If our credit rating were downgraded below levels specified in the agreements, the maximum additional amount of payments related to termination events that could have been required pursuant to these contingent features, assuming no change in fair value, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 was approximately $1.94$2.19 billion. Such accelerated settlement would be at fair value and therefore not affect our consolidated results of operations.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
In connection with our trading activities, we use derivative financial instruments in our role as a financial intermediary and as both a manager and servicer of financial assets, in order to accommodate our clients' investment and risk management needs. In addition, we use derivative financial instruments for risk management purposes as economic hedges, which are not formally designated as accounting hedges, in order to contribute to our overall corporate earnings and liquidity. These activities are designed to generate trading services revenue and to manage volatility in our NII. The level of market risk that we assume is a function of our overall objectives and liquidity needs, our clients' requirements and market volatility. For additional information on derivativederivatives not designated as hedging instruments, refer to pages 161154 to 162155 in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
In connection with our asset-and-liabilityasset and liability management activities, we use derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Interest rate risk, defined as the sensitivity of income or financial condition to variations in interest rates, is a significant non-trading market risk
State Street Corporation | 7971
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
variations in interest rates, is a significant non-trading market risk to which our assets and liabilities are exposed. We manage our interest rate risk by identifying, quantifying and hedging our exposures, using fixed-rate portfolio securities and a variety of derivative financial instruments, most frequently interest-rate swaps. Interest rate swap agreements alter the interest-rate characteristics of specific balance sheet assets or liabilities. We use foreign exchange forward and swap contracts to hedge foreign exchange exposure to various foreign currencies with respect to certain assets and liabilities. Our hedging relationships are formally designated, and qualify for hedge accounting, as fair value, cash flow or net investment hedges. For additional information on derivatives designated as hedging instruments, refer to pages 162155 to 166159 in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Fair Value Hedges
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to modify our interest income from certain AFS investment securities from a fixed rate to a floating rate. The hedged AFS investment securities included hedged trusts that had a weighted-average life of approximately 4.43.6 years as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, compared to 4.54.6 years as of December 31, 2016.2017.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements to modify our interest expense on eight senior notes and one subordinated note from fixed rates to floating rates. The senior and subordinated notes are hedged with interest rate swap contracts with notional amounts, maturities and fixed-rate coupon terms that effectively hedge the fixed-rate notes. The table below summarizes the maturities and the paid fixed interest rates paid for the hedged senior and subordinated notes:
|
| | | | |
| September 30, 2017 | | Maturity | | Paid Fixed Interest Rate |
| Senior Notes | | | | |
| | | 2020 | | 2.55% |
| | | 2021 | | 4.38 |
| | | 2021 | | 1.95 |
| | | 2022 | | 2.65 |
| | | 2023 | | 3.70 |
| | | 2024 | | 3.30 |
| | | 2025 | | 3.55 |
| | | 2026 | | 2.65 |
| | | | | |
| Subordinated Notes | | | | |
| | | 2023 | | 3.10 |
|
| | |
| June 30, 2018 |
| Maturity | | Fixed Interest Rate Paid |
| Senior Notes |
| 2020 | | 2.55% |
| 2021 | | 4.38 |
| 2021 | | 1.95 |
| 2022 | | 2.65 |
| 2023 | | 3.70 |
| 2024 | | 3.30 |
| 2025 | | 3.55 |
| 2026 | | 2.65 |
| Subordinated Notes |
| 2023 | | 3.10 |
As of January 1, 2018, we prospectively changed the presentation of gains (losses) on hedging instruments and hedge items designated as fair value hedges of interest rate risk, and any resulting hedge ineffectiveness, from processing fees and other revenue to NII. The change was made prospectively and prior periods have not been adjusted.
We have entered into foreign exchange swap contracts to hedge the change in fair value attributable to foreign exchange movements in our foreign currency denominated investment securities and deposits. These forward contracts convert the foreign currency risk to U.S. dollars, thereby mitigating our exposure to fluctuations in the fair value of the securities and deposits attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.
Cash Flow Hedges
We have entered into foreign exchange contracts to hedge the change in cash flows attributable to foreign exchange movements in foreign currency denominated investment securities. These foreign exchange contracts convert the foreign currency risk to U.S. dollars, thereby mitigating our exposure to fluctuations in the cash flows of the securities attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates.
We have entered into an interest rate swap agreementagreements to hedge the forecasted cash flows associated with LIBOR-indexed floating-rate loans. The interest rate swaps synthetically convert the loan interest receipts from a variable-rate to a fixed-rate, thereby mitigating the risk attributable to changes in the LIBOR benchmark rate. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the maximum maturity date of the underlying loans is approximately 5.04 years.
Net Investment Hedges
We have entered into foreign exchange contracts to protect the net investment in our foreign operations against adverse changes in exchange rates. These forward contracts convert the foreign currency risk to U.S. dollars, thereby mitigating our exposure to fluctuations in the fair value of our net investments in our foreign operations attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. The changes in fair value of the foreign exchange forward contracts are recorded, net of taxes, in the foreign currency translation component of other comprehensive income. Effectiveness of net investment hedges is based on the overall changes in the fair value of the forward contracts.
State Street Corporation | 8072
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table presents the aggregate contractual, or notional, amounts of derivative financial instruments entered into in connection with our trading and asset-and-liability management activities as of the dates indicated:
| | | (In millions) | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | June 30,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts: | | | | | | |
| Futures | $ | 14,262 |
| | $ | 13,455 |
| $ | 5,906 |
| | $ | 2,392 |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | |
| Forward, swap and spot | 1,618,670 |
| | 1,414,765 |
| 2,224,255 |
| | 1,679,976 |
|
| Options purchased | 455 |
| | 337 |
| 752 |
| | 350 |
|
| Options written | 262 |
| | 202 |
| 419 |
| | 302 |
|
| Futures | — |
| | — |
| 10 |
| | 50 |
|
| Commodity and equity contracts: | | Commodity and equity contracts: | | |
Commodity(1) | | 53 |
| | 16 |
|
Equity(1) | | 68 |
| | 50 |
|
| Other: | | | | | | |
| Stable value contracts | 25,351 |
| | 27,182 |
| 26,252 |
| | 26,653 |
|
Deferred value awards(1)(2) | 531 |
| | 409 |
| |
Deferred value awards(2) | | 558 |
| | 473 |
|
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts: | | | | | | |
| Swap agreements | 10,616 |
| | 10,169 |
| 11,316 |
| | 11,047 |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts: | | | | | | |
| Forward and swap | 27,429 |
| | 8,564 |
| 3,996 |
| | 28,913 |
|
(1) Primarily composed of positions held by a consolidated sponsored investment fund, more fully described in Note 11.
(2) Represents grants of deferred value awards to employees; refer to discussionrefer to pages 154 to 155 in this note under "Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments."
(2) Amount as of December 31, 2016 reflects $249 million relatedNote 10 to the acceleration of expense associated with certain cash settled deferred incentive compensation awards.consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 2017 Form 10-K
.
In connection with our asset-and-liabilityasset and liability management activities, we have entered into interest-rate contracts designated as fair value and cash flow hedges to manage our interest rate risk. The following tables present the aggregate notional amounts of these interest rate contracts and the related assets or liabilities being hedged as of the dates indicated:
| | | | September 30, 2017 | June 30, 2018 |
| (In millions) | Fair Value Hedges | | Cash
Flow
Hedges | | Total | Fair Value Hedges | | Cash
Flow
Hedges | | Total |
| Investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 1,323 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,323 |
| $ | 1,223 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,223 |
|
Long-term debt(1) | 8,493 |
| | — |
| | 8,493 |
| 8,493 |
| | — |
| | 8,493 |
|
| Floating-rate loans | — |
| | 800 |
| | 800 |
| — |
| | 1,600 |
| | 1,600 |
|
| Total | $ | 9,816 |
| | $ | 800 |
| | $ | 10,616 |
| $ | 9,716 |
| | $ | 1,600 |
| | $ | 11,316 |
|
| | | | December 31, 2016(2) | December 31, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Fair Value Hedges | Fair Value Hedges | | Cash
Flow
Hedges | | Total |
| Investment securities available-for-sale | $ | 1,444 |
| $ | 1,254 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,254 |
|
Long-term debt(1) | 8,725 |
| 8,493 |
| | — |
| | 8,493 |
|
| Floating rate loans | | — |
| | 1,300 |
| | 1,300 |
|
| Total | $ | 10,169 |
| $ | 9,747 |
| | $ | 1,300 |
| | $ | 11,047 |
|
SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, these fair value hedges decreased the carrying value of LTD presented in our consolidated statement of condition by $1$301 million. As of December 31, 2016,2017, these fair value hedges decreased the carrying value of long-term debt presented in our consolidated statement of condition by $15$87 million.(2) As of December 31, 2016, there were no interest-rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges.
The following table presents the contractual and weighted-averageweighted average interest rates for long-term debt, which include the effects of the fair value hedges presented in the table above, for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Contractual Rates | | Rate Including Impact of Hedges | | Contractual Rates | | Rate Including Impact of Hedges |
| Long-term debt | 3.52 | % | | 3.66 | % | | 3.34 | % | | 2.61 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Contractual
Rates | | Rate
Including
Impact of Hedges | | Contractual
Rates | | Rate
Including
Impact of Hedges |
| Long-term debt | 3.61 | % | | 3.51 | % | | 3.37 | % | | 2.58 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Contractual Rates | | Rate Including Impact of Hedges | | Contractual Rates | | Rate Including Impact of Hedges |
| Long-term debt | 3.30 | % | | 2.67 | % | | 3.37 | % | | 2.27 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Contractual
Rates | | Rate
Including
Impact of Hedges | | Contractual
Rates | | Rate
Including
Impact of Hedges |
| Long-term debt | 3.35 | % | | 2.61 | % | | 3.41 | % | | 2.24 | % |
State Street Corporation | 73
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables present the fair value of derivative financial instruments, excluding the impact of master netting agreements, recorded in our consolidated statement of condition as of the dates indicated. The impact of master netting agreements is provided in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Assets(1) |
| | Fair Value |
| (In millions) | June 30,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 17,332 |
| | $ | 11,477 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,334 |
| | $ | 11,478 |
|
| | | | |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 120 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Total | $ | 48 |
| | $ | 128 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Assets(1) |
| | Fair Value |
| (In millions) | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 11,667 |
| | $ | 15,982 |
|
| Total | $ | 11,667 |
| | $ | 15,982 |
|
| | | | |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 70 |
| | $ | 502 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | 3 |
| | 68 |
|
| Total | $ | 73 |
| | $ | 570 |
|
(1) Derivative assets are included within other assets in our consolidated statement of condition.
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Liabilities(1) |
| | Fair Value |
| (In millions) | June 30,
2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 17,470 |
| | $ | 11,361 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | 270 |
| | 284 |
|
| Total | $ | 17,740 |
| | $ | 11,645 |
|
| | | | |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 88 |
| | $ | 107 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | 106 |
| | 100 |
|
| Total | $ | 194 |
| | $ | 207 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Derivative Liabilities(1) |
| | Fair Value |
| (In millions) | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 11,506 |
| | $ | 15,881 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | 319 |
| | 380 |
|
| Total | $ | 11,825 |
| | $ | 16,261 |
|
| | | | |
| Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | 77 |
| | $ | 75 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | 107 |
| | 348 |
|
| Total | $ | 184 |
| | $ | 423 |
|
(1) Derivative liabilities are included within other liabilities in our consolidated statement of condition.
State Street Corporation | 81
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables present the impact of our use of derivative financial instruments on our consolidated statement of income for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Trading services revenue | | $ | 195 |
| | $ | 170 |
| | $ | 379 |
| | $ | 333 |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue(1) | | — |
| | (9 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Interest expense(1) | | — |
| | — |
| | (15 | ) | | — |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | Trading services revenue | | (2 | ) | | 8 |
| | (4 | ) | | 9 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | Trading services revenue | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other derivative contracts | Compensation and employee benefits | | (42 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (106 | ) | | (95 | ) |
| Total | | | $ | 150 |
| | $ | 140 |
| | $ | 254 |
| | $ | 245 |
|
(1) The first six months of 2018 includes approximately $15 million of swap costs related to the first quarter of 2018 that were reclassified from Processing fees and other revenues to NII. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts | | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | | 57 |
| | 14 |
| | Net interest income | | — |
| | — |
| | Net interest income | | 7 |
| | 7 |
|
| | | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 7 |
|
| Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | 71 |
| | (87 | ) | | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | — |
| | — |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | $ | 71 |
| | $ | (87 | ) | | Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Trading services revenue | | $ | 152 |
| | $ | 161 |
| | $ | 485 |
| | $ | 477 |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | (9 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (11 | ) | | (13 | ) |
| Interest-rate contracts | Trading services revenue | | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | 7 |
| | (6 | ) |
| Credit derivative contracts | Trading services revenue | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| Other derivative contracts | Trading services revenue | | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) |
| Other derivative contracts | Compensation and employee benefits | | (25 | ) | | 41 |
| | (120 | ) | | 168 |
|
| Total | | | $ | 116 |
| | $ | 199 |
| | $ | 361 |
| | $ | 624 |
|
State Street Corporation | 74
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Hedged Item in Fair Value Hedging Relationship | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Derivatives designated as fair value hedges: | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | | Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts | | | $ | (29 | ) | | $ | (1 | ) | | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | 1 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | 19 |
| | $ | 24 |
| | Investment securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | (19 | ) | | $ | (24 | ) | | (38 | ) | | (92 | ) | | Net interest income | | — |
| | — |
| | Net interest income | | 14 |
| | 13 |
|
| | | | $ | (67 | ) | | $ | (93 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: | | Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | 200 |
| | 1 |
| | FX deposit | | Processing fees and other revenue | | (200 | ) | | (1 | ) | | 35 |
| | (101 | ) | | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | — |
| | — |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | — |
| | — |
|
| Interest-rate contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | 9 |
| | 22 |
| | Available-for-sale securities | | Processing fees and other revenue(1) | | (9 | ) | | (22 | ) | |
| Interest-rate contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | (8 | ) | | (79 | ) | | Long-term debt | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | 5 |
| | 78 |
| |
| Total | | $ | 220 |
| | $ | (32 | ) | | $ | (223 | ) | | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 35 |
| | $ | (101 | ) | | Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Total | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain
(Loss) on Derivative
Recognized in
Consolidated
Statement of Income | | Hedged Item in Fair Value Hedging Relationship | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain
(Loss) on Hedged
Item Recognized in
Consolidated
Statement of Income | |
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| Derivatives designated as fair value hedges: | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | 21 |
| | $ | 43 |
| | Investment securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | (21 | ) | | $ | (43 | ) | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | 1,282 |
| | 247 |
| | FX deposit | | Processing fees and other revenue | | (1,282 | ) | | (247 | ) | |
| Interest-rate contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | 23 |
| | (15 | ) | | Available-for-sale securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue(2) | | (21 | ) | | 15 |
| |
| Interest-rate contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | 37 |
| | 297 |
| | Long-term debt | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | (39 | ) | | (282 | ) | |
| Total | | $ | 1,363 |
| | $ | 572 |
| | $ | (1,363 | ) | | $ | (557 | ) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Hedged Item in Fair Value Hedging Relationship | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | | | Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | | | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Derivatives designated as fair value hedges: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | (30 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | Investment securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | 30 |
| | $ | (4 | ) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | (601 | ) | | 102 |
| | FX deposit | | Processing fees and other revenue | | 601 |
| | (101 | ) |
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Net interest income | | 10 |
| | — |
| | Available-for-sale securities | | Net interest income(2) | | (9 | ) | | — |
|
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Net interest income | | (47 | ) | | — |
| | Long-term debt | | Net interest income | | 44 |
| | — |
|
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Processing fees and
other revenue | | — |
| | 3 |
| | Available-for-sale securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue(2) | | — |
| | (2 | ) |
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Processing fees and other revenue | | — |
| | 64 |
| | Long-term debt | | Processing fees and other revenue | | — |
| | (63 | ) |
| Total | | | $ | (668 | ) | | $ | 173 |
| | | | | | $ | 666 |
| | $ | (170 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain
(Loss) on Derivative
Recognized in
Consolidated
Statement of Income | | Hedged Item in Fair Value Hedging Relationship | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Hedged Item in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain
(Loss) on Hedged
Item Recognized in
Consolidated
Statement of Income |
| | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | | | 2018 | | 2017 | | | | | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Derivatives designated as fair value hedges: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | (43 | ) | | $ | 2 |
| | Investment securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue | | $ | 43 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
| Foreign exchange contracts | Processing fees and other revenue | | (353 | ) | | 1,081 |
| | FX deposit | | Processing fees and other revenue | | 353 |
| | (1,081 | ) |
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Net interest income | | 31 |
| | — |
| | Available-for-sale securities | | Net interest income(3) | | (30 | ) | | — |
|
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Net interest income | | (214 | ) | | — |
| | Long-term debt | | Net interest income | | 200 |
| | — |
|
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Processing fees and
other revenue | | — |
| | 15 |
| | Available-for-sale securities | | Processing fees and
other revenue(3) | | — |
| | (13 | ) |
Interest-rate contracts(1) | Processing fees and other revenue | | — |
| | 44 |
| | Long-term debt | | Processing fees and other revenue | | — |
| | (44 | ) |
| Total | | | $ | (579 | ) | | $ | 1,142 |
| | | | | | $ | 566 |
| | $ | (1,140 | ) |
(1) As of January 1, 2018, we prospectively changed the presentation of gains (losses) on hedging instruments and hedge items designated as fair value hedges of interest rate risk, and any resulting hedge ineffectiveness, from processing fees and other revenue to NII.
(2)In the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, $4$5 million and $13$3 million, respectively, of net unrealized (losses) gains on AFS investment securities designated in fair value hedges were recognized in OCI.
(2) (3)In both the nine monthssix month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, $13$9 million and $(9) million, respectively, of net unrealized (losses) gains on AFS investment securities designated in fair value hedges were recognized in OCI.
State Street Corporation | 82
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Differences between the gains (losses) on the derivativeforeign exchange contracts and the gains (losses) on the hedged item, excluding any amounts recorded in NII,accrued interest, represent hedge ineffectiveness.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | | | 2017 | | 2016 | | | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | (1 | ) | | (65 | ) | | Net interest income | | — |
| | — |
| | Net interest income | | 5 |
| | 6 |
|
| Total | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | (65 | ) | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | (47 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total | $ | (47 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income | | Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from OCI to Consolidated Statement of Income | | Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income | | Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivative Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
|
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
|
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest-rate contracts | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Net interest income | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Foreign exchange contracts | (93 | ) | | (293 | ) | | Net interest income | | — |
| | — |
| | Net interest income | | 18 |
| | 17 |
|
| Total | $ | (95 | ) | | $ | (293 | ) | | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | 18 |
| | $ | 17 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Derivatives designated as net investment hedges: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | $ | (148 | ) | | $ | 55 |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | Gains (Losses) related to investment securities, net | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Total | $ | (148 | ) | | $ | 55 |
| | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
State Street Corporation | 8375
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 8. Offsetting Arrangements
We manage credit and counterparty risk by entering into enforceable netting agreements and other collateral arrangements with counterparties to derivative contracts and secured financing transactions, including resale and repurchase agreements, and principal securities borrowing and lending agreements. These netting agreements mitigate our counterparty credit risk by providing for a single net settlement with a counterparty of all financial transactions covered by the agreement in an event of default as defined under such agreement. In limited cases, a netting agreement may also provide for the periodic netting of settlement payments with respect to multiple different transaction types in the
normal course of business. For additional information on offsetting arrangements, refer to pages 166160 to 170163 in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements included under
Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, the fair value of securities received as collateral from third parties where we are permitted to transfer or re-pledge the securities totaled $2.96$9.60 billion and $1.77$2.47 billion, respectively, and the fair value of the portion that had been transferred or re-pledged as of the same dates was $41.2$6.68 billion and $15 million, and $166 million, respectively.
The following tables present information about the offsetting of assets related to derivative contracts and secured financing transactions, as of the dates indicated:
| | | Assets: | | September 30, 2017 | | June 30, 2018 |
| | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition |
| (In millions) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Assets Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Received(4) | | Net Amount(5) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Assets Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Received(4) | | Net Amount(5) |
| Derivatives: | Derivatives: | | | | | | | Derivatives: | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 11,737 |
| | $ | (6,389 | ) | | $ | 5,348 |
| | | | $ | 5,348 |
| | $ | 17,380 |
| | $ | (9,674 | ) | | $ | 7,706 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,706 |
|
Interest-rate contracts | | 3 |
| | (2 | ) | | 1 |
| | | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other derivative contracts | | | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
| Cash collateral and securities netting | | NA |
| | (637 | ) | | (637 | ) | | $ | (106 | ) | | (743 | ) | | NA |
| | (1,557 | ) | | (1,557 | ) | | (100 | ) | | (1,657 | ) |
| Total derivatives | | 11,740 |
| | (7,028 | ) | | 4,712 |
| | (106 | ) | | 4,606 |
| | 17,382 |
| | (11,231 | ) | | 6,151 |
| | (100 | ) | | 6,051 |
|
| Other financial instruments: | Other financial instruments: | | | | | | | Other financial instruments: | | | | | | |
Resale agreements and securities borrowing(6) | | 63,821 |
| | (36,728 | ) | | 27,093 |
| | (27,093 | ) | | — |
| |
Resale agreements and securities borrowing(7) | | | 73,482 |
| | (47,108 | ) | | 26,372 |
| | (26,063 | ) | | 310 |
|
| Total derivatives and other financial instruments | | $ | 75,561 |
| | $ | (43,756 | ) | | $ | 31,805 |
| | $ | (27,199 | ) | | $ | 4,606 |
| | $ | 90,864 |
| | $ | (58,339 | ) | | $ | 32,523 |
| | $ | (26,163 | ) | | $ | 6,361 |
|
| | | Assets: | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition |
| (In millions) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Assets Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Received(4) | | Net Amount(5) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Assets Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Received(4) | | Net Amount(5) |
| Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 16,484 |
| | $ | (8,257 | ) | | $ | 8,227 |
| | | | $ | 8,227 |
| | $ | 11,597 |
| | $ | (5,548 | ) | | $ | 6,049 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,049 |
|
Interest-rate contracts | | 68 |
| | (68 | ) | | — |
| | | | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | 8 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | | | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
|
| Cash collateral and securities netting | | NA |
| | (906 | ) | | (906 | ) | | $ | (247 | ) | | (1,153 | ) | | NA |
| | (2,045 | ) | | (2,045 | ) | | (124 | ) | | (2,169 | ) |
| Total derivatives | | 16,552 |
| | (9,231 | ) | | 7,321 |
| | (247 | ) | | 7,074 |
| | 11,606 |
| | (7,593 | ) | | 4,013 |
| | (124 | ) | | 3,889 |
|
| Other financial instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Resale agreements and securities borrowing(6) | | 58,677 |
| | (35,517 | ) | | 23,160 |
| | (22,939 | ) | | 221 |
| |
Resale agreements and securities borrowing(7) | | | 70,079 |
| | (47,434 | ) | | 22,645 |
| | (22,645 | ) | | — |
|
| Total derivatives and other financial instruments | | $ | 75,229 |
| | $ | (44,748 | ) | | $ | 30,481 |
| | $ | (23,186 | ) | | $ | 7,295 |
| | $ | 81,685 |
| | $ | (55,027 | ) | | $ | 26,658 |
| | $ | (22,769 | ) | | $ | 3,889 |
|
(1) Amounts include all transactions regardless of whether or not they are subject to an enforceable netting arrangement.
(2) Derivative amounts are carried at fair value and securities financing amounts are carried at amortized cost, except for securities collateral which is also carried at fair value. For additional information about the measurement basis of these instruments, refer to pages 131127 to 142138 in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
(3) Amounts subject to netting arrangements which have been determined to be legally enforceable and eligible for netting in the consolidated statement of condition.
(4) Includes securities in connection with our securities borrowing transactions.
(5) Includes amounts secured by collateral not determined to be subject to enforceable netting arrangements.
(6) Variation margin payments presented as settlements rather than collateral.
(7) Included in the $27,093$26,372 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 were $3,465$3,583 million of resale agreements and $23,628$22,789 million of collateral provided related to securities borrowing. Included in the $23,160$22,645 million as of December 31, 20162017 were $1,956$3,241 million of resale agreements and $21,204$19,404 million of collateral provided related to securities borrowing. Resale agreements and collateral provided related to securities borrowing were recorded in securities purchased under resale agreements and other assets, respectively, in our consolidated statement of condition. AdditionalRefer to Note 9 for additional information aboutwith respect to principal securities finance transactions is provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.transactions.
NA Not applicable
State Street Corporation | 8476
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following tables present information about the offsetting of liabilities related to derivative contracts and secured financing transactions, as of the dates indicated:
| | | Liabilities: | | September 30, 2017 | | June 30, 2018 |
| | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition |
| (In millions) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Provided(4) | | Net Amount(5) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Provided(4) | | Net Amount(5) |
| Derivatives: | Derivatives: | | | | | | | Derivatives: | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 11,583 |
| | $ | (6,390 | ) | | $ | 5,193 |
| | | | $ | 5,193 |
| | $ | 17,558 |
| | $ | (9,674 | ) | | $ | 7,884 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 7,884 |
|
Interest-rate contracts(6) | | 107 |
| | (1 | ) | | 106 |
| | | | 106 |
| | 106 |
| | — |
| | 106 |
| | — |
| | 106 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | | 319 |
| | — |
| | 319 |
| | | | 319 |
| | 270 |
| | — |
| | 270 |
| | — |
| | 270 |
|
| Cash collateral and securities netting | | NA |
| | (1,074 | ) | | (1,074 | ) | | $ | (262 | ) | | (1,336 | ) | | NA |
| | (2,934 | ) | | (2,934 | ) | | (330 | ) | | (3,264 | ) |
| Total derivatives | | 12,009 |
| | (7,465 | ) | | 4,544 |
| | (262 | ) | | 4,282 |
| | 17,934 |
| | (12,608 | ) | | 5,326 |
| | (330 | ) | | 4,996 |
|
| Other financial instruments: | Other financial instruments: | | | | | |
|
| Other financial instruments: | | | | | | |
Repurchase agreements and securities lending(7) | | 45,864 |
| | (36,728 | ) | | 9,136 |
| | (6,564 | ) | | 2,572 |
| | 61,087 |
| | (47,108 | ) | | 13,979 |
| | (12,509 | ) | | 1,470 |
|
| Total derivatives and other financial instruments | | $ | 57,873 |
| | $ | (44,193 | ) | | $ | 13,680 |
| | $ | (6,826 | ) | | $ | 6,854 |
| | $ | 79,021 |
| | $ | (59,716 | ) | | $ | 19,305 |
| | $ | (12,839 | ) | | $ | 6,466 |
|
| | | Liabilities: | | December 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2017 |
| | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition | | | | | | | | Gross Amounts Not Offset in Statement of Condition |
| (In millions) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Provided(4) | | Net Amount(5) | | Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities(1)(2) | | Gross Amounts Offset in Statement of Condition(3) | | Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in Statement of Condition | | Cash and Securities Provided(4) | | Net Amount(5) |
| Derivatives: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign exchange contracts | | $ | 15,956 |
| | $ | (8,253 | ) | | $ | 7,703 |
| | | | $ | 7,703 |
| | $ | 11,467 |
| | $ | (5,548 | ) | | $ | 5,919 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,919 |
|
Interest-rate contracts | | 348 |
| | (73 | ) | | 275 |
| | | | 275 |
| | 100 |
| | — |
| | 100 |
| | — |
| | 100 |
|
| Other derivative contracts | | 380 |
| | — |
| | 380 |
| | | | 380 |
| | 285 |
| | — |
| | 285 |
| | — |
| | 285 |
|
| Cash collateral and securities netting | | NA |
| | (2,356 | ) | | (2,356 | ) | | $ | (180 | ) | | (2,536 | ) | | NA |
| | (422 | ) | | (422 | ) | | (450 | ) | | (872 | ) |
| Total derivatives | | 16,684 |
| | (10,682 | ) | | 6,002 |
| | (180 | ) | | 5,822 |
| | 11,852 |
| | (5,970 | ) | | 5,882 |
| | (450 | ) | | 5,432 |
|
| Other financial instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Resale agreements and securities lending(7) | | 44,933 |
| | (35,517 | ) | | 9,416 |
| | (7,059 | ) | | 2,357 |
| |
Repurchase agreements and securities lending(7) | | | 54,127 |
| | (47,434 | ) | | 6,693 |
| | (4,299 | ) | | 2,394 |
|
| Total derivatives and other financial instruments | | $ | 61,617 |
| | $ | (46,199 | ) | | $ | 15,418 |
| | $ | (7,239 | ) | | $ | 8,179 |
| | $ | 65,979 |
| | $ | (53,404 | ) | | $ | 12,575 |
| | $ | (4,749 | ) | | $ | 7,826 |
|
(1) Amounts include all transactions regardless of whether or not they are subject to an enforceable netting arrangement.
(2) Derivative amounts are carried at fair value and securities financing amounts are carried at amortized cost, except for securities collateral which is also carried at fair value. For additional information about the measurement basis of these instruments, refer to pages 131127 to 142138 in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
(3) Amounts subject to netting arrangements which have been determined to be legally enforceable and eligible for netting in the consolidated statement of condition.
(4) Includes securities provided in connection with our securities lending transactions.
(5) Includes amounts secured by collateral not determined to be subject to enforceable netting arrangements.
(6) Variation margin payments presented as settlements rather than collateral.
(7) Included in the $9,136$13,979 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 were $3,867$3,088 million of repurchase agreements and $5,269$10,891 million of collateral received related to securities lending.lending transactions. Included in the $9,416$6,693 million as of December 31, 20162017 were $4,400$2,842 million of repurchase agreements and $5,016$3,851 million of collateral received related to securities lending.lending transactions. Repurchase agreements and collateral received related to securities lending were recorded in securities sold under repurchase agreements and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in our consolidated statement of condition. AdditionalRefer to Note 9 for additional information aboutwith respect to principal securities finance transactions is provided in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.transactions.
NA Not applicable
State Street Corporation | 8577
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The securities transferred under resale and repurchase agreements typically are U.S. Treasury, agency and agency MBS. In our principal securities borrowing and lending arrangements, the securities transferred are predominantly equity securities and some corporate debt securities. The fair value of the securities transferred may increase in value to an amount greater than the amount received under our repurchase and securities lending arrangements, which exposes the Company with counterparty risk. We require the review of the price of the underlying
securities in relation to the carrying value of the
repurchase agreements and securities lending arrangements on a daily basis and when appropriate, adjust the cash or security to be obtained or returned to counterparties that is reflective of the required collateral levels.
The following tables summarizetable summarizes our enhanced custody repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions by category of collateral pledged and remaining maturity of these agreements as of the periods indicated:
| | | | | Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements | | Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements |
| | | As of September 30, 2017 | | As of June 30, 2018 | | As of December 31, 2017(1) |
| (In millions) | | Overnight and Continuous | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | | Total | | Overnight and Continuous | | Up to 30 Days | | Total | | Overnight and Continuous |
| Repurchase agreements: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and agency securities | | $ | 35,009 |
| |
| |
| | $ | 35,009 |
| | $ | 45,123 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 45,123 |
| | $ | 43,072 |
|
| Total | | 35,009 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35,009 |
| | 45,123 |
| | — |
| | 45,123 |
| | 43,072 |
|
| Securities lending transactions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| US Treasury and agency securities | | | 115 |
| | — |
| | 115 |
| | — |
|
| Corporate debt securities | | 103 |
| |
| |
| | 103 |
| | 88 |
| | — |
| | 88 |
| | 35 |
|
| Equity securities | | 10,433 |
| |
| | 297 |
| | 10,730 |
| | 8,596 |
| | 165 |
| | 8,761 |
| | 11,020 |
|
| Non-U.S. sovereign debt | | 22 |
| |
| |
| | 22 |
| |
Other(2) | | | 7,000 |
| | — |
| | 7,000 |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 10,558 |
| | — |
| | 297 |
| | 10,855 |
| | 15,799 |
| | 165 |
| | 15,964 |
| | 11,055 |
|
| Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements and securities lending | | $ | 45,567 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 297 |
| | $ | 45,864 |
| | $ | 60,922 |
| | $ | 165 |
| | $ | 61,087 |
| | $ | 54,127 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements |
| | | As of December 31, 2016 |
| (In millions) | | Overnight and Continuous | | Up to 30 days | | 30 – 90 days | | Total |
| Repurchase agreements: | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and agency securities | | $ | 35,509 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35,509 |
|
| Total | | 35,509 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35,509 |
|
| Securities lending transactions: | | | | | | | | |
| Corporate debt securities | | 53 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53 |
|
| Equity securities | | 8,337 |
| | — |
| | 1,034 |
| | 9,371 |
|
| Total | | 8,390 |
| | — |
| | 1,034 |
| | 9,424 |
|
| Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements and securities lending | | $ | 43,899 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,034 |
| | $ | 44,933 |
|
(2) Represents a portion of underlying client assets related to our enhanced custody business, which assets clients have allowed us to transfer and re-pledge.
State Street Corporation | 8678
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 9. Commitments and Guarantees
For additional information about our commitments and guarantees, refer to pages 171164 to 172165 in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
The following table presents the aggregate gross contractual amounts of our off-balance sheet commitments and off-balance sheet guarantees as of the dates indicated.
| | | (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Commitments: | | | | | | |
| Unfunded credit facilities | $ | 27,008 |
| | $ | 26,993 |
| $ | 26,654 |
| | $ | 26,488 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Guarantees(1): | | | | | | |
| Indemnified securities financing | $ | 379,459 |
| | $ | 360,452 |
| $ | 396,801 |
| | $ | 381,817 |
|
| Stable value protection | 25,351 |
| | 27,182 |
| 26,252 |
| | 26,653 |
|
| Standby letters of credit | 3,255 |
| | 3,459 |
| 2,955 |
| | 3,158 |
|
(1) The potential losses associated with these guarantees equal the gross contractual amounts and do not consider the value of any collateral or reflect any participations to independent third parties.
Unfunded Credit Facilities
Unfunded credit facilities consist of liquidity facilities for our fund and municipal lending clients and undrawn lines of credit related to senior secured bank loans.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, approximately 73%72% of our unfunded commitments to extend credit expire within one year. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire or renew without being drawn upon, the gross contractual amounts do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements.
Indemnified Securities Financing
On behalf of our clients, we lend their securities, as agent, to brokers and other institutions. In most circumstances, we indemnify our clients for the fair market value of those securities against a failure of the borrower to return such securities.
The following table summarizes the aggregate fair values of indemnified securities financing and related collateral, as well as collateral invested in indemnified repurchase agreements, as of the dates indicated:
| | | (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Fair value of indemnified securities financing | $ | 379,459 |
| | $ | 360,452 |
| $ | 396,801 |
| | $ | 381,817 |
|
| Fair value of cash and securities held by us, as agent, as collateral for indemnified securities financing | 396,123 |
| | 377,919 |
| 416,084 |
| | 400,828 |
|
| Fair value of collateral for indemnified securities financing invested in indemnified repurchase agreements | 68,243 |
| | 60,003 |
| 59,391 |
| | 61,270 |
|
| Fair value of cash and securities held by us or our agents as collateral for investments in indemnified repurchase agreements | 73,157 |
| | 63,959 |
| 63,016 |
| | 65,272 |
|
In certain cases, we participate in securities finance transactions as a principal. As a principal, we borrow securities from the lending client and then lend such securities to the subsequent borrower, either a State Streetour client or a broker/dealer. Our right to receive and obligation to return collateral in connection with our securities lending transactions are recorded in other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in our consolidated statement of condition. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we had approximately $23.63approximately$22.79 billion and $21.20$19.40 billion, respectively, of collateral provided and approximately $5.27$10.89 billion and $5.02$3.85 billion, respectively, of collateral received from clients in connection with our participation in principal securities finance transactions.
Stable Value Protection
In the normal course of our business, we offer products that provide book-value protection, primarily to plan participants in stable value funds managed by non-affiliated investment managers of post-retirement defined contribution benefit plans, particularly 401(k) plans. The book-value protection is provided on portfolios of intermediate investment grade fixed-income securities, and is intended to provide safety and stable growth of principal invested. The protection is intended to cover any shortfall in the event that a significant number of plan participants withdraw funds when book value exceeds market value and the liquidation of the assets is not sufficient to redeem the participants. The investment parameters of the underlying portfolios, combined with structural protections, are designed to provide cushion and guard against payments even under extreme stress scenarios.
State Street Corporation | 8779
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
These contingencies are individually accounted for as derivative financial instruments. The notional amounts of the stable value contracts are presented as “derivatives not designated as hedging instruments” in the table of aggregate notional amounts of derivative financial instruments provided in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q. We have not made a payment under these contingencies that we consider material to our consolidated financial condition, and management believes that the probability of payment under these contingencies in the future, that we would consider material to our consolidated financial condition, is remote.
Standby Letters of Credit
Standby letters of credit provide credit enhancement to our municipal clients to support the issuance of capital markets financing.
Note 10. Contingencies
Legal and Regulatory Matters
In the ordinary course of business, we and our subsidiaries are involved in disputes, litigation, and governmental or regulatory inquiries and investigations, both pending and threatened. These matters, if resolved adversely against us or settled, may result in monetary damages,awards or payments, fines and penalties or require changes in our business practices. The resolution or settlement of these matters is inherently difficult to predict. Based on our assessment of these pending matters, we do not believe that the amount of any judgment, settlement or other action arising from any pending matter is likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition. However, an adverse outcome in certain of the matters described below could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period in which such matter is resolved, or an accrual is determined to be required, on our consolidated financial condition, or on our reputation.
We evaluate our needs for accruals of loss contingencies related to legal and regulatory proceedings on a case-by-case basis. When we have a liability that we deem probable, and we deem the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated as of the date of our consolidated financial statements, we accrue for our estimate of the amount of loss. We also consider a loss probable and establish an accrual when we make, or intend to make, an offer of settlement. Once established, an accrual is subject to subsequent adjustment as a result of additional information. The resolution of legal and regulatory proceedings and the amount of reasonably estimable loss (or range thereof) are
inherently difficult to predict, especially in the early stages of proceedings. Even if a loss is probable, an
amount (or range) of loss might not be reasonably estimated until the later stages of the proceeding due to many factors (collectively, "factors influencing reasonable estimates"), such as the presence of complex or novel legal theories, the discretion of governmental authorities in seeking sanctions or negotiating resolutions in civil and criminal matters, the pace and timing of discovery and other assessments of facts and the procedural posture of the matter.matter (collectively, "factors influencing reasonable estimates").
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, our aggregate accruals for loss contingencies for legal and regulatory matters totaled approximately $15$14 million. To the extent that we have established accruals in our consolidated statement of condition for probable loss contingencies, such accruals may not be sufficient to cover our ultimate financial exposure associated with any settlements or judgments. Any such ultimate financial exposure, or proceedings to which we may become subject in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, on our future consolidated financial statements or on our reputation. Except where otherwise noted below, we have not established significant accruals with respect to the claims discussed and do not believe that potential exposure is probable and can be reasonably estimated.discussed.
We have identified certain matters for which loss is reasonably possible (but not probable) in future periods, whether in excess of an accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, and for which we are able to estimate a range of reasonably possible loss. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, our estimate of the range of reasonably possible loss for these matters is from zero to approximately $15$45 million in the aggregate. Our estimate with respect to the aggregate range of reasonably possible loss is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions and known and unknown uncertainties. The matters underlying the estimated range will change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate.
In certain other pending matters, , including claims that represent the Invoicing Matter,substantial majority of the potential exposure with respect to the invoicing matter, the Federal Reserve/Massachusetts Division of Banks Written Agreementwritten agreement and Shareholder Litigationthe shareholder derivative litigation matter discussed below, it is not currently feasible to reasonably estimate the amount or a range of reasonably possible loss (including reasonably possible loss in excess of amounts accrued), and such losses, which may be significant, are not included in the estimate of reasonably possible loss discussed above. This is due to, among other factors, the factors influencing reasonable estimates described above. These factors are particularly prevalent in governmental and regulatory inquiries and investigations. As a result,
State Street Corporation | 8880
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
among other factors, one or more considerations consistent with the factors influencing reasonable estimates described in the above discussion of probable loss accruals. These considerations are particularly prevalent in governmental and regulatory inquiries and investigations and, as a result, reasonably possible loss estimates often are not feasible until the later stages of the inquiry or investigation or of any related legal or regulatory proceeding. An adverse outcome in one or more of the matters for which we dohave not estimateestimated the amount or a range of reasonably possible loss, individually or in theaggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, on our future consolidated financial statements or on our reputation. Given that we cannot estimate reasonably possible loss for all legal and regulatory proceedings as to which we may be subject now or in the future, including matters that if adversely concluded may present material financial, regulatory and reputational risks, no conclusion as to the ultimate exposure from current pending or potential legal or regulatory proceedings should be drawn from the current estimate of reasonably possible loss.
The following discussion provides information with respect to significant legal, governmental and regulatory matters.
Transition Management
In January 2014, we entered into a settlement with the FCA, pursuant to which we paid a fine of £22.9 million (approximately $37.8 million), as a result of our having charged six clients of our U.K. transition management business during 2010 and 2011 amounts in excess of the contractual terms. The SEC and the DOJ opened separate investigations into this matter. The U.S. Attorney’s office in Boston has charged three former employees in our transition management business with criminal fraud in connection with their alleged role in this matter. Two of these individuals have pled guilty to one count of criminal conspiracy. Charges remain pending against the third individual. The SEC has also commenced a parallel civil enforcement proceeding against that individual.
On January 18, 2017, we announced that we had entered into a settlement agreement with the DOJ and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts to resolve their investigation. Under the terms of the agreement, we, among other things, paid a fine of $32.3 million and entered into a deferred prosecution agreement. Under the deferred prosecution agreement, we agreed to retain an independent compliance and ethics monitor for a term of three years (subject to extension) which will, among other things, review and monitor the
effectiveness of our compliance controls and business ethics and make related recommendations.
In September 2017, we entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a penalty of $32.3 million (equal to the fine paid to the DOJ). The SEC settlement also required us to retain an independent ethics and compliance consultant. The monitor appointed in connection with the previously announced DOJ settlement will fulfill that role.
Federal Reserve/Massachusetts Division of Banks Written Agreement
On June 1, 2015, we entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve and the Massachusetts Division of Banks relating to deficiencies identified in our compliance programs with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, AML regulations and U.S. economic sanctions regulations promulgated by OFAC. As part of this enforcement action, we are required to, among other things, implement improvements to our compliance programs and to retain an independent firm to conduct a review of account and transaction activity covering a prior three-month period to evaluate whether any suspicious activity not previously reported should have been identified and reported in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. To the extent deficiencies in our historical reporting are identified as a result of the transaction review or if we fail to comply with the terms of the written agreement, we may become subject to fines and other regulatory sanctions, which may have a material adverse effect on us.
Invoicing Matter
In December 2015, we announced a review of the manner in which we invoiced certain expenses to some of our Investment Servicing clients, primarily in the United States, during an 18-year period going back to 1998, and our determination that we had incorrectly invoiced clients for certain expenses. We informed our clients in December 2015 that we will paycontinue to them the amounts we concluded were incorrectly invoiced to them, plus interest. We currently expect the cumulative total of our payments to be at least $340 million (including interest), in connection with that review, which is ongoing. We are implementingimplement enhancements to our billing processes, and we are reviewing the conduct of our employees and have taken appropriate steps to address conduct inconsistent with our standards, including, in some cases, termination of employment. We are also evaluating otherIn connection with our enhancements to our billing processes, we continue to review historical billing practices relatingand may from time to time identify additional remediation. We currently expect the cumulative total of our Investment Servicing clients, including calculation of asset-based fees.payments to customers for these matters to be at least $360 million.
WeIn March 2017, a purported class action was commenced against us alleging that our invoicing practices violated duties owed to retirement plan customers under ERISA. In addition, we have received a purported class action
State Street Corporation | 89
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
demand letter alleging that our invoicing practices were unfair and deceptive under Massachusetts law. A class of customers, or particular customers, may assert that we have not paid to them all amounts incorrectly invoiced, and may seek double or treble damages under Massachusetts law. In addition, in March 2017, a purported class action was commenced against us alleging that our invoicing practices violated duties owed to retirement plan customers under ERISA.
We are also responding to requests for information from, and are cooperating with investigations by, governmental and regulatory authorities on these matters, including the civil and criminal divisions of the DOJ, the SEC, the DOL and the Massachusetts Attorney General, and the New Hampshire Bureau of Securities Regulation, which could result in significant fines or other sanctions, civil and criminal, against us. If these governmental or regulatory authorities were to conclude
that all or a portion of the billing errorerrors merited civil or criminal sanctions, any fine or other penalty could be a significant percentage, or a multiple of, the portion of the overcharging serving as the basis of such a claim or of the full amount of the overcharging.overcharged. The governmental and regulatory authorities have significant discretion in civil and criminal matters as to the fines and other penalties they may seek to impose. The severity of such fines or other penalties could take into account factors such as the amount and duration of our incorrect invoicing, the government’s or regulator's assessment of the conduct of our employees, as well as prior conduct such as that which resulted in our January 2017 deferred prosecution agreement in connection with transition management services and our recent settlement of civil claims regarding our indirect foreign exchange business. The SEC has recently requested that we commence settlement discussions to resolve claims the SEC may bring against us relating to our overcharges of registered investment companies. There can be no assurance that any settlement will be reached or, if so, the impact of any such settlement on other claims relating to these matters.
Any governmental or regulatory proceeding or sanction or theThe outcome of any litigationof these proceedings and, in particular, any criminal sanction could materially adversely affect our results of operations and could have significant collateral consequences for our business and reputation.
Federal Reserve/Massachusetts Division of Banks Written Agreement
On June 1, 2015, we entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve and the Massachusetts Division of Banks relating to deficiencies identified in our compliance programs with the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act, AML regulations and U.S. economic sanctions regulations promulgated by OFAC. As part of this enforcement action, we have been required to, among other things, implement improvements to our compliance programs and to retain an independent firm to conduct a review of account and transaction activity to evaluate whether any suspicious activity was not previously reported. If we fail to comply with the terms of the written agreement, we may become subject to fines and other regulatory sanctions, which may have a material adverse effect on our reputation or business, including the imposition of restrictions on the operation of our business or a reduction in client demand. Resolution of these matters could also have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations for the period or periods in which such matters are resolved or an accrual is determined to be required. No accrual, other than a reserve for client reimbursement, is reflected on our consolidated statement of condition as of September 30, 2017.us.
Shareholder Litigation
A State Street shareholder has filed a purported class action complaint against the Company alleging that the Company’s financial statements in its annual reports for the 2011-142011-2014 period were misleading due to
the inclusion of revenues associated with the Transition Managementinvoicing matter referenced above and Invoicing matters.the facts surrounding our 2017 settlements with the U.S. government relating to our transition management
State Street Corporation | 81
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
business. We have agreed in principle to settle this matter on a class basis for $4.9 million, subject to final approval by the Court. In addition, a State Street shareholder has filed a derivative complaint against the Company's past and present officers and directors to recover alleged losses incurred by the Company relating to the Invoicing Matterinvoicing matter and to our January 2016 settlement with the SEC concerning Ohio public retirement plans. plans matter.
Income Taxes
In determining our provision for income taxes, we make certain judgments and interpretations with respect to tax laws in jurisdictions in which we have business operations. Because of the complex nature of these laws, in the normal course of our business, we are subject to challenges from U.S. and non-U.S. income tax authorities regarding the amount of income taxes due. These challenges may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of taxable income among tax jurisdictions. We recognize a tax benefit when it is more likely than not that our position will result in a tax deduction or credit. Unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $63$83 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 decreased from $71$94 million as of December 31, 2016.2017.
We are presently under audit by a number of tax authorities, and the Internal Revenue Service is currently reviewing our U.S. income tax returns for the tax years 2014 and 2015. The earliest tax year open to examination in jurisdictions where we have material operations is 2010.2011. Management believes that we have sufficiently accrued liabilities as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 for tax exposures.
State Street Corporation | 90
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 11. Variable Interest Entities
For additional information on our VIEs, refer to pages 174167 to 175168 in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
Tax-ExemptTax Exempt Investment Program
In the normal course of our business, we structure and sell certificated interests in pools of tax-exempt investment-gradetax exempt investment grade assets, principally to our mutual fund clients. We structure these pools as partnership trusts, and the assets and liabilities of the trusts are recorded in our consolidated statement of condition as AFS investment securities and other short-termshort term borrowings. As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we carried AFS investment securities, composed of securities related to state and political subdivisions, with a fair value of $1.29$1.21 billion and $1.35$1.25 billion, respectively, and other short-termshort term borrowings of $1.10$1.06 billion and $1.16$1.08 billion, respectively, in our consolidated statement of condition in connection with these trusts. The interest income and interest expense generated by the investments and certificated interests, respectively, are
recorded as components of NII when earned or incurred.
The trusts had a weighted-averageweighted average life of approximately 4.43.61 years as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, compared to approximately 4.54.6 years as of December 31, 2016.
Under separate legal agreements, we provide liquidity facilities to these trusts and, with respect to certain securities, letters of credit. As of September 30, 2017, our commitments to the trusts under these liquidity facilities and letters of credit totaled $1.12 billion and $351 million, respectively, and none of the liquidity facilities were utilized.2017.
Interests in Investment Funds
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, the averageaggregate assets and liabilities of our consolidated sponsored investment funds totaled $119.82$188 million and $19.44$88 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had no2017, the aggregate assets and liabilities of our consolidated funds.sponsored investment funds totaled $149 million and $50 million, respectively.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, our potential maximum total exposure associated with the consolidated sponsored investment funds totaled $100 million and represented the value of our economic ownership interest in the funds.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, we managed certain funds, considered VIEs, in which we held a variable interest but for which we were not deemed to be the primary beneficiary. Our potential maximum loss exposure related to these unconsolidated funds totaled $79 million and $121
$72 million as of Septemberboth June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016, respectively,2017, and represented the carrying value of our investments, which are recorded in either AFS investment securities or other assets in our consolidated statement of condition. The amount of loss we may recognize during any period is limited to the carrying amount of our investments in the unconsolidated funds.
State Street Corporation | 9182
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 12. Shareholders' Equity
Preferred Stock
The following table summarizes selected terms of each of the series of the preferred stock issued and outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Issuance Date | | Depositary Shares Issued | | Ownership Interest Per Depositary Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Share | | Liquidation Preference Per Depositary Share | | Net Proceeds of Offering (In millions) | | Redemption Date(1) |
Preferred Stock(2): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | August 2012 | | 20,000,000 |
| | 1/4,000th | | $ | 100,000 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 488 |
| | September 15, 2017 |
| Series D | February 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
| | 1/4,000th | | 100,000 |
| | 25 |
| | 742 |
| | March 15, 2024 |
| Series E | November 2014 | | 30,000,000 |
| | 1/4,000th | | 100,000 |
| | 25 |
| | 728 |
| | December 15, 2019 |
| Series F | May 2015 | | 750,000 |
| | 1/100th | | 100,000 |
| | 1,000 |
| | 742 |
| | September 15, 2020 |
| Series G | April 2016 | | 20,000,000 |
| | 1/4,000th | | 100,000 |
| | 25 |
| | 493 |
| | March 15, 2026 |
(1) On the redemption date, or any dividend declaration date thereafter, the preferred stock and corresponding depositary shares may be redeemed by us, in whole or in part, at the liquidation price per share and liquidation price per depositary share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends.
(2) The preferred stock and corresponding depositary shares may be redeemed at our option in whole, but not in part, prior to the redemption date upon the occurrence of a regulatory capital treatment event, as defined in the certificate of designation, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per share and liquidation price per depositary share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends.
The following tables presenttable presents the dividends declared for each of the series of preferred stock issued and outstanding for the periods indicated:
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions)(1) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total
(In millions)(1) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) |
| Preferred Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 6 |
| $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 1,313 |
| | $ | 0.33 |
| | $ | 7 |
|
| Series D | 1,475 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,475 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 11 |
| 1,475 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,475 |
| | 0.37 |
| | 11 |
|
| Series E | 1,500 |
| | 0.38 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,500 |
| | 0.38 |
| | 11 |
| 1,500 |
| | 0.38 |
| | 11 |
| | 1,500 |
| | 0.38 |
| | 11 |
|
| Series F | 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
| | 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
| — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Series G | 1,338 |
| | 0.33 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,338 |
| | 0.33 |
| | 7 |
| 1,338 |
| | 0.33 |
| | 7 |
| | 1,338 |
| | 0.33 |
| | 7 |
|
| Total | | | | | $ | 55 |
| | | | | | $ | 55 |
| | | | | $ | 36 |
| | | | | | $ | 36 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Dividends Declared per Depositary Share | | Total (In millions) |
| Preferred Stock: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Series C | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 0.99 |
| | $ | 19 |
| | $ | 3,939 |
| | $ | 0.99 |
| | $ | 19 |
| $ | 2,626 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 13 |
| | $ | 2,626 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 13 |
|
| Series D | 4,425 |
| | 1.11 |
| | 33 |
| | 4,425 |
| | 1.11 |
| | 33 |
| 2,950 |
| | 0.74 |
| | 22 |
| | 2,950 |
| | 0.74 |
| | 22 |
|
| Series E | 4,500 |
| | 1.14 |
| | 33 |
| | 4,500 |
| | 1.14 |
| | 33 |
| 3,000 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 22 |
| | 3,000 |
| | 0.76 |
| | 22 |
|
| Series F | 5,250 |
| | 52.50 |
| | 40 |
| | 5,250 |
| | 52.50 |
| | 40 |
| 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
| | 2,625 |
| | 26.25 |
| | 20 |
|
| Series G | 4,014 |
| | 0.99 |
| | 21 |
| | 2,289 |
| | 0.57 |
| | 12 |
| 2,676 |
| | 0.66 |
| | 14 |
| | 2,676 |
| | 0.66 |
| | 14 |
|
| Total | | | | | $ | 146 |
| | | | | | $ | 137 |
| | | | | $ | 91 |
| | | | | | $ | 91 |
|
(1) Dividends were paid in September 2017.June 2018.
In October 2017,July 2018, we declared dividends on our Series C, D, E, F and G preferred stock of approximately $1,313, $1,475, $1,500, $2,625 and $1,338,$1,388, respectively, per share, or approximately $0.33, $0.37, $0.38, $26.25 and $0.33, respectively, per depositary share. These dividends total approximately $7 million, $11 million, $11 million, $20 million and $7 million on our Series C, D, E, F and G preferred stock, respectively, which will be paid in September 2018.
State Street Corporation | 9283
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
per depositary share. These dividends total approximately $6 million, $11 million, $11 million and $7 million on our Series C, D, E and G preferred stock, respectively, which will be paid in December 2017.
Common Stock
In June 2017, our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $1.4 billion of our common stock through June 30, 2018 (the 2017 Program).
We did not purchase any common stock under the 2017 Plan in the second quarter of 2018. In June 2016,2018 our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to$1.4 $1.2 billion of our common stock through June 30, 20172019 (the 20162018 Program). The table below presents the activity under both the 2017 Program and 2016 Program during the periodsperiod indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |
| | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) | | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) |
2016 Program(1) | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | 9.4 |
| | $ | 79.93 |
| | $ | 750 |
|
| 2017 Program | 3.7 |
| | 93.39 |
| | 350 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 93.39 |
| | 350 |
|
| Total | 3.7 |
| | $ | 93.39 |
| | $ | 350 |
| | 13.1 |
| | $ | 83.77 |
| | $ | 1,100 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018(1) |
| | Shares Acquired
(In millions) | | Average Cost per Share | | Total Acquired
(In millions) |
| 2017 Program | 3.3 |
| | $ | 105.31 |
| | $ | 350 |
|
(1) Includes $158 million relating toThere were no shares acquiredrepurchased in exchange for BFDS stock during the firstsecond quarter of 2017. Additional information about the exchange is provided in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.2018.
The table below presents the dividends declared on common stock for the periods indicated: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) |
| Common Stock | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 156 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 147 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 442 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | 414 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) | | Dividends Declared per Share | | Total (In millions) |
| Common Stock | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 153 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
| | $ | 142 |
| | $ | 0.84 |
| | $ | 307 |
| | $ | 0.76 |
| | $ | 286 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following table presents the after-tax components of AOCI as of the dates indicated:
| | | (In millions) | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | June 30, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 229 |
| $ | (113 | ) | | $ | (56 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities portfolio | 301 |
| | (225 | ) | (112 | ) | | 148 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) related to reclassified available-for-sale securities | 18 |
| | 25 |
| 22 |
| | 19 |
|
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities | 319 |
| | (200 | ) | (90 | ) | | 167 |
|
| Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges | (73 | ) | | (86 | ) | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities designated in fair value hedges | | (55 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on hedges of net investments in non-U.S. subsidiaries | (52 | ) | | 95 |
| (30 | ) | | (65 | ) |
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit | (6 | ) | | (9 | ) | (7 | ) | | (6 | ) |
| Net unrealized losses on retirement plans | (184 | ) | | (194 | ) | |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on retirement plans | | (156 | ) | | (170 | ) |
| Foreign currency translation | (943 | ) | | (1,875 | ) | (1,037 | ) | | (815 | ) |
| Total | $ | (984 | ) | | $ | (2,040 | ) | $ | (1,488 | ) | | $ | (1,009 | ) |
The following table presents changes in AOCI by component, net of related taxes, for the periods indicated:
| | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| (In millions) | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Hedges of Net Investments in Non-U.S. Subsidiaries | | Other-Than-Temporary Impairment on Held-to-Maturity Securities | | Net Unrealized Losses on Retirement Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Hedges of Net Investments in Non-U.S. Subsidiaries | | Other-Than-Temporary Impairment on Held-to-Maturity Securities | | Net Unrealized Losses on Retirement Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 229 |
| | $ | (286 | ) | | $ | 95 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (194 | ) | | $ | (1,875 | ) | | $ | (2,040 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | | $ | (56 | ) | | $ | 103 |
| | $ | (65 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (170 | ) | | $ | (815 | ) | | $ | (1,009 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (274 | ) | | 555 |
| | (147 | ) | | 3 |
| | — |
| | 932 |
| | 1,069 |
| (57 | ) | | (254 | ) | | 35 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | (222 | ) | | (496 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified into (out of) earnings | — |
| | (23 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 10 |
| | — |
| | (13 | ) | — |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | (2 | ) | | 13 |
| | — |
| | 17 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (274 | ) | | 532 |
| | (147 | ) | | 3 |
| | 10 |
| | 932 |
| | 1,056 |
| (57 | ) | | (248 | ) | | 35 |
| | (1 | ) | | 14 |
| | (222 | ) | | (479 | ) |
| Balance as of September 30, 2017 | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 246 |
| | $ | (52 | ) | | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (184 | ) | | $ | (943 | ) | | $ | (984 | ) | |
| Balance as of June 30, 2018 | | $ | (113 | ) | | $ | (145 | ) | | $ | (30 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (156 | ) | | $ | (1,037 | ) | | $ | (1,488 | ) |
State Street Corporation | 9384
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
| (In millions) | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities | | Net Unrealized Gain (Losses) on Hedges of Net Investments in Non-U.S. Subsidiaries | | Other-Than-Temporary Impairment on Held-to-Maturity Securities | | Net Unrealized Losses on Retirement Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available-for-Sale Securities | | Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Hedges of Net Investments in Non-U.S. Subsidiaries | | Other-Than-Temporary Impairment on Held-to-Maturity Securities | | Net Unrealized Losses on Retirement Plans | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2015 | $ | 293 |
| | $ | (128 | ) | | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | (16 | ) | | $ | (183 | ) | | $ | (1,394 | ) | | $ | (1,442 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | $ | 229 |
| | $ | (286 | ) | | $ | 95 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | $ | (194 | ) | | $ | (1,875 | ) | | $ | (2,040 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (213 | ) | | 520 |
| | 55 |
| | 6 |
| | — |
| | 77 |
| | 445 |
| (247 | ) | | 505 |
| | (101 | ) | | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | 627 |
| | 785 |
|
| Amounts reclassified into (out of) earnings | — |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| — |
| | (24 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | (15 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) | (213 | ) | | 524 |
| | 55 |
| | 5 |
| | 1 |
| | 77 |
| | 449 |
| (247 | ) | | 481 |
| | (101 | ) | | 2 |
| | 8 |
| | 627 |
| | 770 |
|
| Balance as of September 30, 2016 | $ | 80 |
| | $ | 396 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | (11 | ) | | $ | (182 | ) | | $ | (1,317 | ) | | $ | (993 | ) | |
| Balance as of June 30, 2017 | | $ | (18 | ) | | $ | 195 |
| | $ | (6 | ) | | $ | (7 | ) | | $ | (186 | ) | | $ | (1,248 | ) | | $ | (1,270 | ) |
The following table presents after-tax reclassifications into earnings for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | |
| (In millions) | Amounts Reclassified into (out of) Earnings | | Affected Line Item in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | |
| Net realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities, net of related taxes of ($1) and ($2), respectively | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | Net gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities |
| Retirement plans: | | | | | |
| Amortization of actuarial losses, net of related taxes of $0 and $1, respectively | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | Compensation and employee benefits expenses |
| Total reclassifications (out of) into AOCI | $ | 6 |
| | $ | 1 |
| | |
| | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | Three Months Ended June 30, | |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| (In millions) | Amounts Reclassified into (out of) Earnings | | Affected Line Item in Consolidated Statement of Income | Amounts Reclassified into
(out of) Earnings | | Affected Line Item in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities, net of related taxes of $15 and ($3), respectively | $ | (23 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | Net gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities | |
| Net realized gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities, net of related taxes of ($2) and zero, respectively | | $ | 7 |
| | $ | — |
| | Net gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | | | | |
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit, net of related taxes of $0 and $1, respectively | — |
| | (1 | ) | | Losses reclassified (from) to other comprehensive income | |
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | Losses reclassified (from) to other comprehensive income |
| Retirement plans: | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of actuarial losses, net of related taxes of ($2) and ($2), respectively | 10 |
| | 1 |
| | Compensation and employee benefits expenses | |
| Amortization of actuarial losses, net of related taxes of $24 and $1, respectively | | 26 |
| | 3 |
| | Compensation and employee benefits expenses |
| Total reclassifications (out of) into AOCI | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | 4 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 3 |
| |
| | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, | |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| (In millions) | | Amounts Reclassified into
(out of) Earnings | | Affected Line Item in Consolidated Statement of Income |
| Available-for-sale securities: | | | | | |
| Net realized gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities, net of related taxes of ($3) and $16, respectively | | $ | 6 |
| | $ | (24 | ) | | Net gains (losses) from sales of available-for-sale securities |
| Held-to-maturity securities: | | | | | |
| Other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities related to factors other than credit | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | Losses reclassified (from) to other comprehensive income |
| Retirement plans: | | | | | |
| Amortization of actuarial losses, net of related taxes of ($4) and ($2), respectively | | 13 |
| | 9 |
| | Compensation and employee benefits expenses |
| Total reclassifications (out of) into AOCI | | $ | 17 |
| | $ | (15 | ) | |
State Street Corporation | 9485
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 13. Regulatory Capital
We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our consolidated financial condition. Under current regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, we must meet specified capital requirements that involve quantitative measures of our consolidated assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet exposures calculated in conformity with regulatory accounting practices. Our capital components and their classifications are subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. For additional information on regulatory capital, and the requirements to which we are subject, refer to pages 179171 to 180172 in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, State Street and State Street Bank, as advanced approaches banking organizations, are subject to a permanent "capital floor" in the calculation and assessment of their regulatory capital adequacy by U.S. banking regulators. Beginning on January 1, 2015, we were required to calculate our risk-based capital ratios using both the advanced approaches and the standardized approach. As a result, from January 1, 2015 going forward, our risk-based capital ratios for regulatory assessment purposes are the lower of each ratio calculated under the standardized approach and the advanced approaches.
The methods for the calculation of our and State Street Bank's risk-based capital ratios will change as the provisions of the Basel III final rule related to the numerator (capital) and denominator (risk-weighted assets) are phased in, and as we begin calculating our risk-weighted assets using the advanced approaches. These ongoing methodological changes will result in differences in our reported capital ratios from one reporting period to the next that are independent of applicable changes to our capital base, our asset composition, our off-balance sheet exposures or our risk profile.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, State Street and State Street Bank exceeded all regulatory capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, State Street Bank was categorized as “well capitalized” under the applicable regulatory capital adequacy framework, and exceeded all “well capitalized” ratio guidelines to which it was subject. Management believes that no conditions or events have occurred since SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 that have changed the capital categorization of State Street Bank.
The following table presents the regulatory capital structure, total risk-weighted assets, related regulatory capital ratios and the minimum required regulatory capital ratios for State Street and State Street Bank as of the dates indicated. As a result of changes in the methodologies used to calculate our regulatory capital ratios from period to period as the provisions of the Basel III final rule are phased in, the ratios presented in the table for each period-end are not directly comparable. Refer to the footnotes following the table.
State Street Corporation | 9586
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
| | | | | State Street | | State Street Bank | | State Street | | State Street Bank |
| (In millions) | (In millions) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches September 30, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach September 30, 2017(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2016(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2016(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches September 30, 2017(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach September 30, 2017(2) |
| Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2016(1) |
| Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2016(2) | (In millions) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches June 30, 2018(1) | | Basel III Standardized Approach June 30, 2018(2) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2017(1) | | Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2017(2) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches June 30, 2018(1) | | Basel III Standardized Approach June 30, 2018(2) | | Basel III Advanced Approaches December 31, 2017(1) | | Basel III Standardized Approach December 31, 2017(2) |
| Common shareholders' equity: | Common shareholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Common shareholders' equity: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock and related surplus | Common stock and related surplus | $ | 10,307 |
| | $ | 10,307 |
| | $ | 10,286 |
| | $ | 10,286 |
| | $ | 11,382 |
| | $ | 11,382 |
| | $ | 11,376 |
| | $ | 11,376 |
| Common stock and related surplus | $ | 10,324 |
| | $ | 10,324 |
| | $ | 10,302 |
| | $ | 10,302 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
| | $ | 11,612 |
|
| Retained earnings | Retained earnings | | 18,675 |
| | 18,675 |
| | 17,459 |
| | 17,459 |
| | 12,286 |
| | 12,286 |
| | 12,285 |
| | 12,285 |
| Retained earnings | | 19,856 |
| | 19,856 |
| | 18,856 |
| | 18,856 |
| | 13,189 |
| | 13,189 |
| | 12,312 |
| | 12,312 |
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (985 | ) | | (985 | ) | | (1,936 | ) | | (1,936 | ) | | (808 | ) | | (808 | ) | | (1,648 | ) | | (1,648 | ) | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1,446 | ) | | (1,446 | ) | | (972 | ) | | (972 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | | (1,251 | ) | | (809 | ) | | (809 | ) |
| Treasury stock, at cost | Treasury stock, at cost | | (8,697 | ) | | (8,697 | ) | | (7,682 | ) | | (7,682 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Treasury stock, at cost | | (9,317 | ) | | (9,317 | ) | | (9,029 | ) | | (9,029 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 19,300 |
|
| 19,300 |
| | 18,127 |
| | 18,127 |
| | 22,860 |
| | 22,860 |
| | 22,013 |
| | 22,013 |
| | 19,417 |
|
| 19,417 |
| | 19,157 |
| | 19,157 |
| | 23,550 |
| | 23,550 |
| | 23,115 |
| | 23,115 |
|
| Regulatory capital adjustments: | Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Regulatory capital adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | (6,739 | ) | | (6,739 | ) | | (6,348 | ) | | (6,348 | ) | | (6,447 | ) | | (6,447 | ) | | (6,060 | ) | | (6,060 | ) | Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities(3) | (7,008 | ) | | (7,008 | ) | | (6,877 | ) | | (6,877 | ) | | (6,711 | ) | | (6,711 | ) | | (6,579 | ) | | (6,579 | ) |
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | | (122 | ) | | (122 | ) | | (155 | ) | | (155 | ) | | (90 | ) | | (90 | ) | | (148 | ) | | (148 | ) | Other adjustments | | (186 | ) | | (186 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (76 | ) | | (44 | ) | | (44 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | Common equity tier 1 capital | 12,439 |
|
| 12,439 |
| | 11,624 |
| | 11,624 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 15,805 |
| | 15,805 |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 12,223 |
|
| 12,223 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,531 |
| | 16,531 |
|
| Preferred stock | Preferred stock | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Preferred stock | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | 3,196 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Trust preferred capital securities subject to phase-out from tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | | (29 | ) | | (29 | ) | | (103 | ) | | (103 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Tier 1 capital | Tier 1 capital | 15,606 |
|
| 15,606 |
| | 14,717 |
| | 14,717 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 16,323 |
| | 15,805 |
| | 15,805 |
| Tier 1 capital | 15,419 |
|
| 15,419 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 15,382 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,795 |
| | 16,531 |
| | 16,531 |
|
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | 1,072 |
| | 1,072 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,076 |
| | 1,179 |
| | 1,179 |
| Qualifying subordinated long-term debt | 765 |
| | 765 |
| | 980 |
| | 980 |
| | 765 |
| | 765 |
| | 983 |
| | 983 |
|
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Trust preferred capital securities phased out of tier 1 capital | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| ALLL and other | ALLL and other | 5 |
| | 79 |
| | 19 |
| | 77 |
| | — |
| | 79 |
| | 15 |
| | 77 |
| ALLL and other | — |
| | 73 |
| | 4 |
| | 72 |
| | — |
| | 73 |
| | — |
| | 72 |
|
| Other adjustments | Other adjustments | | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| Other adjustments | | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total capital | Total capital | $ | 16,684 |
|
| $ | 16,758 |
| | $ | 15,909 |
| | $ | 15,967 |
| | $ | 17,399 |
| | $ | 17,478 |
| | $ | 16,999 |
| | $ | 17,061 |
| Total capital | $ | 16,184 |
|
| $ | 16,257 |
| | $ | 16,367 |
| | $ | 16,435 |
| | $ | 17,560 |
| | $ | 17,633 |
| | $ | 17,514 |
| | $ | 17,586 |
|
| Risk-weighted assets: | Risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk-weighted assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Credit risk | Credit risk | $ | 50,197 |
| | $ | 106,377 |
| | $ | 50,900 |
| | $ | 98,125 |
| | $ | 47,282 |
| | $ | 103,024 |
| | $ | 47,383 |
| | $ | 94,413 |
| Credit risk | $ | 48,308 |
| | $ | 106,063 |
| | $ | 49,976 |
| | $ | 101,349 |
| | $ | 45,689 |
| | $ | 103,156 |
| | $ | 47,448 |
| | $ | 98,433 |
|
Operational risk(4) | Operational risk(4) | 45,795 |
| | NA |
| | 44,579 |
| | NA |
| | 45,270 |
| | NA |
| | 44,043 |
| | NA |
| Operational risk(4) | 45,991 |
| | NA |
| | 45,822 |
| | NA |
| | 45,423 |
| | NA |
| | 45,295 |
| | NA |
|
Market risk(5) | Market risk(5) | 3,005 |
| | 1,203 |
| | 3,822 |
| | 1,751 |
| | 3,005 |
| | 1,203 |
| | 3,822 |
| | 1,751 |
| Market risk(5) | 4,203 |
| | 1,677 |
| | 3,358 |
| | 1,334 |
| | 4,205 |
| | 1,677 |
| | 3,375 |
| | 1,334 |
|
| Total risk-weighted assets | Total risk-weighted assets | | $ | 98,997 |
| | $ | 107,580 |
| | $ | 99,301 |
| | $ | 99,876 |
| | $ | 95,557 |
| | $ | 104,227 |
| | $ | 95,248 |
| | $ | 96,164 |
| Total risk-weighted assets | | $ | 98,502 |
| | $ | 107,740 |
| | $ | 99,156 |
| | $ | 102,683 |
| | $ | 95,317 |
| | $ | 104,833 |
| | $ | 96,118 |
| | $ | 99,767 |
|
| Adjusted quarterly average assets | Adjusted quarterly average assets | $ | 211,396 |
| | $ | 211,396 |
| | $ | 226,310 |
| | $ | 226,310 |
| | $ | 208,308 |
| | $ | 208,308 |
| | $ | 222,584 |
| | $ | 222,584 |
| Adjusted quarterly average assets | $ | 216,896 |
| | $ | 216,896 |
| | $ | 209,328 |
| | $ | 209,328 |
| | $ | 214,670 |
| | $ | 214,670 |
| | $ | 206,070 |
| | $ | 206,070 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Capital Ratios: | 2017 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(6) | 2016 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2018 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(6) | 2017 Minimum Requirements Including Capital Conservation Buffer and G-SIB Surcharge(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common equity tier 1 capital | 6.5 | % | 5.5 | % | 12.6 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 11.7 | % | | 11.6 | % | | 17.1 | % | | 15.7 | % | | 16.6 | % | | 16.4 | % | 7.5 | % | 6.5 | % | 12.4 | % | | 11.3 | % | | 12.3 | % | | 11.9 | % | | 17.6 | % | | 16.0 | % | | 17.2 | % | | 16.6 | % |
| Tier 1 capital | 8.0 |
| 7.0 |
| 15.8 |
| | 14.5 |
| | 14.8 |
| | 14.7 |
| | 17.1 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 16.6 |
| | 16.4 |
| 9.0 |
| 8.0 |
| 15.7 |
| | 14.3 |
| | 15.5 |
| | 15.0 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 16.6 |
|
| Total capital | 10.0 |
| 9.0 |
| 16.9 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 18.2 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 17.8 |
| | 17.7 |
| 11.0 |
| 10.0 |
| 16.4 |
| | 15.1 |
| | 16.5 |
| | 16.0 |
| | 18.4 |
| | 16.8 |
| | 18.2 |
| | 17.6 |
|
| Tier 1 leverage | 4.0 |
| 4.0 |
| 7.4 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 6.5 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 7.1 |
| 4.0 |
| 4.0 |
| 7.1 |
| | 7.1 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 7.8 |
| | 8.0 |
| | 8.0 |
|
(1) Common equity tier 1CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital ratios as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the advanced approaches provisions of the Basel III final rule. Tier 1 leverage ratio as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(2) Common equity tier 1CET1 capital, tier 1 capital and total capital ratios as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the standardized approach provisions of the Basel III final rule. Tier 1 leverage ratio as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were calculated in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(3) Amounts for State Street and State Street Bank as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 consisted of goodwill, net of associated deferred tax liabilities, and 80%100% of other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities. Amounts for State Street and State Street Bank as of December 31, 20162017 consisted of goodwill, net of deferred tax liabilities and 60%80% of other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities. Intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities is phased in as a deduction from capital, in conformity with the Basel III final rule.
(4) Under the current advanced approaches rules and regulatory guidance concerning operational risk models, RWA attributable to operational risk can vary substantially from period-to-period, without direct correlation to the effects of a particular loss event on our results of operations and financial condition and impacting dates and periods that may differ from the dates and periods as of and during which the loss event is reflected in our financial statements, with the timing and categorization dependent on the processes for model updates and, if applicable, model revalidation and regulatory review and related supervisory processes. An individual loss event can have a significant effect on the output of our operational risk RWA under the advanced approaches depending on the severity of the loss event and its categorization among the seven Basel-defined UOMs.
(5) Market risk risk-weighted assets reported in conformity with the Basel III advanced approaches included a CVA which reflected the risk of potential fair value adjustments for credit risk reflected in our valuation of over-the-counter derivative contracts. The CVA was not provided for in the final market risk capital rule; however, it was required by the advanced approaches provisions of the Basel III final rule. We used a simple CVA approach in conformity with the Basel III advanced approaches.
(6) Minimum requirements will be phased in up to full implementation beginning on January 1, 2019; minimum requirements listed are as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2018.
(7) Minimum requirements will be phased in up to full implementation beginning on January 1, 2019; minimum requirements listed are as of December 31, 2016.2017.
NA Not applicable
State Street Corporation | 9687
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 14. Net Interest Income
The following table presents the components of interest income and interest expense, and related NII, for the periods indicated:
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Interest income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits with banks | $ | 45 |
| | $ | 29 |
| | $ | 121 |
| | $ | 101 |
| $ | 90 |
| | $ | 41 |
| | $ | 172 |
| | $ | 76 |
|
| Investment securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | 207 |
| | 200 |
| | 627 |
| | 620 |
| 280 |
| | 208 |
| | 534 |
| | 420 |
|
| State and political subdivisions | 56 |
| | 55 |
| | 171 |
| | 162 |
| 44 |
| | 56 |
| | 96 |
| | 114 |
|
| Other investments | 173 |
| | 208 |
| | 495 |
| | 581 |
| 140 |
| | 164 |
| | 298 |
| | 323 |
|
| Securities purchased under resale agreements | 74 |
| | 40 |
| | 189 |
| | 112 |
| 81 |
| | 69 |
| | 159 |
| | 115 |
|
| Loans and leases | 139 |
| | 97 |
| | 362 |
| | 281 |
| 169 |
| | 118 |
| | 325 |
| | 224 |
|
| Other interest-earning assets | 67 |
| | 18 |
| | 146 |
| | 39 |
| 103 |
| | 44 |
| | 180 |
| | 78 |
|
| Total interest income | 761 |
| | 647 |
| | 2,111 |
| | 1,896 |
| 907 |
| | 700 |
| | 1,764 |
| | 1,350 |
|
| Interest expense: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deposits | 39 |
| | 20 |
| | 96 |
| | 73 |
| 89 |
| | 14 |
| | 152 |
| | 57 |
|
| Securities sold under repurchase agreements | 1 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
| 6 |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | 1 |
|
| Short-term borrowings | 3 |
| | 2 |
| | 7 |
| | 4 |
| 4 |
| | 3 |
| | 7 |
| | 5 |
|
| Long-term debt | 78 |
| | 68 |
| | 227 |
| | 191 |
| 97 |
| | 75 |
| | 194 |
| | 148 |
|
| Other interest-bearing liabilities | 37 |
| | 20 |
| | 91 |
| | 57 |
| 52 |
| | 33 |
| | 102 |
| | 54 |
|
| Total interest expense | 158 |
| | 110 |
| | 423 |
| | 326 |
| 248 |
| | 125 |
| | 462 |
| | 265 |
|
| Net interest income | $ | 603 |
| | $ | 537 |
| | $ | 1,688 |
| | $ | 1,570 |
| $ | 659 |
| | $ | 575 |
| | $ | 1,302 |
| | $ | 1,085 |
|
Note 15. Expenses
The following table presents the components of other expenses for the periods indicated: | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (In millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Insurance | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 31 |
| | $ | 84 |
| | $ | 74 |
| $ | 32 |
| | $ | 28 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | 58 |
|
| Regulatory fees and assessments | 24 |
| | 28 |
| | 77 |
| | 65 |
| 29 |
| | 18 |
| | 59 |
| | 45 |
|
| Securities processing | 4 |
| | 10 |
| | 20 |
| | 20 |
| |
| Sales advertising public relations | | 29 |
| | 15 |
| | 55 |
| | 28 |
|
| Bank operations | | 22 |
| | 19 |
| | 39 |
| | 34 |
|
| Litigation | 3 |
| | 47 |
| | (15 | ) | | 47 |
| 5 |
| | (17 | ) | | 7 |
| | (17 | ) |
| Other | 86 |
| | 71 |
| | 261 |
| | 231 |
| 89 |
| | 69 |
| | 183 |
| | 135 |
|
| Total other expenses | $ | 144 |
| | $ | 187 |
| | $ | 427 |
| | $ | 437 |
| $ | 206 |
| | $ | 132 |
| | $ | 407 |
| | $ | 283 |
|
Restructuring Charges
In the third quarterthree and first ninesix months of 2017,ended June 30, 2018 we recorded no restructuring charges of $33related to Beacon, compared to $62 million and $112 million, respectively, compared to $10 million and $120$79 million in the same periods of 2016. The charges were primarily related to Beacon.2017, respectively.
The following table presents aggregate restructuring activity for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Employee
Related Costs | | Real Estate
Actions | | Asset and Other Write-offs | | Total |
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 56 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 16 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (13 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2017 | 38 |
| | 14 |
| | 2 |
| | 54 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 60 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 62 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (11 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2017 | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 100 |
|
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2017 | $ | 166 |
| | $ | 32 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 201 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (22 | ) | | (4 | ) | | — |
| | (26 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2018 | 144 |
| | 28 |
| | 3 |
| | 175 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (31 | ) | | (3 | ) | | — |
| | (34 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2018 | $ | 113 |
| | $ | 25 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 141 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (In millions) | Employee
Related Costs | | Real Estate
Actions | | Asset and Other Write-offs | | Total |
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | 9 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 23 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 86 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | 97 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (7 | ) | | (12 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 91 |
| | $ | 10 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 108 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | (1 | ) | | 15 |
| | (1 | ) | | 13 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (35 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (39 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2016 | $ | 55 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 5 |
| | $ | 82 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 8 |
| | 3 |
| | (1 | ) | | 10 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (14 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at September 30, 2016 | $ | 49 |
| | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 74 |
|
| Accrual Balance at December 31, 2016 | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 56 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 14 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 16 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (13 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at March 31, 2017 | $ | 38 |
| | $ | 14 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 54 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 60 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 62 |
|
| Payments and other adjustments | (11 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at June 30, 2017 | $ | 87 |
| | $ | 11 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 100 |
|
| Accruals for Beacon | 23 |
| | 9 |
| | 1 |
| | 33 |
|
| Payments and Other Adjustments | (10 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (16 | ) |
| Accrual Balance at September 30, 2017 | $ | 100 |
| | $ | 15 |
| | $ | 2 |
| | $ | 117 |
|
State Street Corporation | 88
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 16. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic EPS is calculated pursuant to the “two-class” method, by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is calculated pursuant to the two-class method, by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the total weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the shares representing the dilutive effect of equity-based awards. The effect of equity-based awards is excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS in periods in which their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The two-class method requires the allocation of undistributed net income between common and participating shareholders. Net income available to common shareholders, presented separately in our consolidated statement of income, is the basis for the calculation of both basic and diluted EPS. Participating securities are composed of unvested and fully vested SERP shares and fully vested deferred director stock awards, which are equity-based awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to
State Street Corporation | 97
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
dividends, and are considered to participate with the common stock in undistributed earnings.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the periods indicated:
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 2017 |
| 2016 | 2018 |
| 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 685 |
| | $ | 563 |
| $ | 734 |
| | $ | 620 |
|
| Less: | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock dividends | (55 | ) | | (55 | ) | (36 | ) | | (36 | ) |
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(1) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 629 |
| | $ | 507 |
| $ | 698 |
| | $ | 584 |
|
| Average common shares outstanding (In thousands): | | | | | | |
| Basic average common shares | 372,765 |
| | 388,358 |
| 365,619 |
| | 375,395 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities: equity-based awards | 5,753 |
| | 4,854 |
| 4,791 |
| | 5,520 |
|
| Diluted average common shares | 378,518 |
| | 393,212 |
| 370,410 |
| | 380,915 |
|
Anti-dilutive securities(2) | — |
| | 2,166 |
| 1,206 |
| | 293 |
|
| Earnings per Common Share: | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 1.69 |
| | $ | 1.31 |
| $ | 1.91 |
| | $ | 1.56 |
|
Diluted(3) | 1.66 |
| | 1.29 |
| 1.88 |
| | 1.53 |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net income | $ | 1,807 |
| | $ | 1,550 |
| $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,122 |
|
| Less: | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock dividends | (146 | ) | | (137 | ) | (91 | ) | | (91 | ) |
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities(1) | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) |
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 1,659 |
| | $ | 1,411 |
| $ | 1,303 |
| | $ | 1,030 |
|
| Average common shares outstanding (In thousands): | | | | | | |
| Basic average common shares | 376,430 |
| | 393,959 |
| 366,524 |
| | 378,293 |
|
| Effect of dilutive securities: equity-based awards | 5,349 |
| | 4,454 |
| 4,891 |
| | 5,196 |
|
| Diluted average common shares | 381,779 |
| | 398,413 |
| 371,415 |
| | 383,489 |
|
Anti-dilutive securities(2) | 250 |
| | 3,027 |
| 2 |
| | 527 |
|
| Earnings per Common Share: | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 4.41 |
| | $ | 3.58 |
| $ | 3.55 |
| | $ | 2.72 |
|
Diluted(3) | 4.35 |
| | 3.54 |
| 3.51 |
| | 2.69 |
|
(1) Represents the portion of net income available to common equity allocated to participating securities, composed of unvested and fully vested SERP shares and fully vested deferred director stock awards, which are equity-based awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and are considered to participate with the common stock in undistributed earnings.
(2) Represents equity-based awards outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted average common shares, because their effect was anti-dilutive. AdditionalFor additional information about equity-based awards, is providedrefer to pages 173 to 175 in Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
(3) Calculations reflect allocation of earnings to participating securities using the two-class method, as this computation is more dilutive than the treasury stock method.
State Street Corporation | 9889
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 17. Line of Business Information
Our operations are organized into two lines of business: Investment Servicing and Investment Management, which are defined based on products and services provided. The results of operations for these lines of business are not necessarily comparable with those of other companies, including companies in the financial services industry. For information about our two lines of business, as well as revenues, expenses and capital allocation methodologies associated with them, refer to pages 188179 to 189181 in Note 24 to the consolidated financial statements included under Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in our 20162017 Form 10-K.
The following is a summary of our line-of-business results for the periods indicated. The "Other" column represents costs incurred that are not allocated to a specific line of business, including certain severance and restructuring costs, acquisition costs and certain provisions for legal contingencies.
| | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | Investment
Servicing | | Investment
Management | | Other | | Total | Investment
Servicing | | Investment
Management | | Other | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Servicing fees | $ | 1,351 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,351 |
| | $ | 1,303 |
| $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | 1,339 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | 1,339 |
|
| Management fees | — |
| | — |
| | 419 |
| | 368 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 419 |
| | 368 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | 397 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | 397 |
|
| Trading services | 239 |
| | 248 |
| | 20 |
| | 19 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 259 |
| | 267 |
| 282 |
| | 272 |
| | 33 |
| | 17 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 315 |
| | 289 |
|
| Securities finance | 147 |
| | 136 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 147 |
| | 136 |
| 154 |
| | 179 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 154 |
| | 179 |
|
| Processing fees and other | 65 |
| | 12 |
| | 1 |
| | (7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 66 |
| | 5 |
| 41 |
| | 32 |
| | 2 |
| | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 43 |
| | 31 |
|
| Total fee revenue | 1,802 |
| | 1,699 |
| | 440 |
| | 380 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,242 |
| | 2,079 |
| 1,858 |
| | 1,822 |
| | 500 |
| | 413 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,358 |
| | 2,235 |
|
| Net interest income | 606 |
| | 536 |
| | (3 | ) | | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 603 |
| | 537 |
| 663 |
| | 576 |
| | (4 | ) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 659 |
| | 575 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | 1 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 4 |
| 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
| | — |
|
| Total revenue | 2,409 |
| | 2,239 |
| | 437 |
| | 381 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,846 |
| | 2,620 |
| 2,530 |
| | 2,398 |
| | 496 |
| | 412 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,026 |
| | 2,810 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| 2 |
| | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 3 |
|
| Total expenses | 1,673 |
| | 1,634 |
| | 314 |
| | 317 |
| | 34 |
| | 33 |
| | 2,021 |
| | 1,984 |
| 1,693 |
| | 1,649 |
| | 389 |
| | 311 |
| | 77 |
| | 71 |
| | 2,159 |
| | 2,031 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 733 |
| | $ | 605 |
| | $ | 123 |
| | $ | 64 |
| | $ | (34 | ) | | $ | (33 | ) | | $ | 822 |
| | $ | 636 |
| $ | 835 |
| | $ | 746 |
| | $ | 107 |
| | $ | 101 |
| | $ | (77 | ) | | $ | (71 | ) | | $ | 865 |
| | $ | 776 |
|
| Pre-tax margin | 30 | % | | 27 | % | | 28 | % | | 17 | % | | | | | | 29 | % | | 24 | % | 33 | % | | 31 | % | | 22 | % | | 25 | % | | | | | | 29 | % | | 28 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | Investment
Servicing | | Investment
Management | | Other | | Total | Investment
Servicing | | Investment
Management | | Other | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Servicing fees | $ | 3,986 |
| | $ | 3,784 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 3,986 |
| | $ | 3,784 |
| $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 2,635 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | 2,635 |
|
| Management fees | — |
| | — |
| | 1,198 |
| | 931 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,198 |
| | 931 |
| — |
| | — |
| | 937 |
| | 779 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 937 |
| | 779 |
|
| Trading services | 768 |
| | 760 |
| | 55 |
| | 46 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 823 |
| | 806 |
| 555 |
| | 529 |
| | 64 |
| | 35 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 619 |
| | 564 |
|
| Securities finance | 459 |
| | 426 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 459 |
| | 426 |
| 295 |
| | 312 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 295 |
| | 312 |
|
| Processing fees and other | 203 |
| | 164 |
| | 6 |
| | (9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 209 |
| | 155 |
| 82 |
| | 138 |
| | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 83 |
| | 143 |
|
| Total fee revenue | 5,416 |
| | 5,134 |
| | 1,259 |
| | 968 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,675 |
| | 6,102 |
| 3,734 |
| | 3,614 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 819 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,736 |
| | 4,433 |
|
| Net interest income | 1,691 |
| | 1,567 |
| | (3 | ) | | 3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,688 |
| | 1,570 |
| 1,311 |
| | 1,085 |
| | (9 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,302 |
| | 1,085 |
|
| Gains (losses) related to investment securities, net | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (39 | ) | | 5 |
| 7 |
| | (40 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
| | (40 | ) |
| Total revenue | 7,068 |
|
| 6,706 |
|
| 1,256 |
|
| 971 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8,324 |
| | 7,677 |
| 5,052 |
|
| 4,659 |
|
| 993 |
|
| 819 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,045 |
| | 5,478 |
|
| Provision for loan losses | 4 |
| | 8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4 |
| | 8 |
| 2 |
| | 1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 1 |
|
| Total expenses | 5,050 |
| | 4,920 |
| | 954 |
| | 817 |
| | 134 |
| | 157 |
| | 6,138 |
| | 5,894 |
| 3,551 |
| | 3,377 |
| | 787 |
| | 640 |
| | 77 |
| | 100 |
| | 4,415 |
| | 4,117 |
|
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 2,014 |
| | $ | 1,778 |
| | $ | 302 |
| | $ | 154 |
| | $ | (134 | ) | | $ | (157 | ) | | $ | 2,182 |
| | $ | 1,775 |
| $ | 1,499 |
| | $ | 1,281 |
| | $ | 206 |
| | $ | 179 |
| | $ | (77 | ) | | $ | (100 | ) | | $ | 1,628 |
| | $ | 1,360 |
|
| Pre-tax margin | 28 | % | | 27 | % | | 24 | % | | 16 | % | | | | | | 26 | % | | 23 | % | 30 | % | | 27 | % | | 21 | % | | 22 | % | | | | | | 27 | % | | 25 | % |
State Street Corporation | 9990
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 18. Revenue from Contracts with Customers
We account for revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with Topic 606, which we adopted on January 1, 2018. See Note 1 for further discussion of our adoption, including the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The amount of revenue that we recognize is measured based on the consideration specified in contracts with our customers, and excludes taxes collected from customers subsequently remitted to governmental authorities. We recognize revenue when a performance obligation is satisfied over time as the services are performed or at a point in time depending on the nature of the services provided as further discussed below. Revenue recognition guidance related to contracts with customers excludes our NII, revenue earned on security lending transactions entered into as principal, realized gains/losses on securities, revenue earned on foreign exchange activity, loans and related fees, and gains/ losses on hedging and derivatives, to which we apply other applicable U.S. GAAP guidance.
For contracts with multiple performance obligations, or contracts that have been combined, we allocate the contracts' transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price. Our contractual fees are negotiated on a customer by customer basis and are representative of standalone selling price utilized for allocating revenue when there are multiple performance obligations.
Substantially all of our services are provided as a distinct series of daily performance obligations that the customer simultaneously benefits from as they are performed. Payments may be made to third party service providers and the expense is recognized gross when we control those services as we are deemed the principal.
Contract durations may vary from short to long term or may be open ended. Termination notice periods are in line with general market practice and typically do not include termination penalties. Therefore for substantially all of our revenues, the duration of the contract and the enforceable rights and obligations do not extend beyond the services that are performed daily or at the transaction level. In instances where we have substantive termination penalties, the duration of the contract may extend through the date of substantive termination penalties.
Investment Servicing
Revenue from contracts with customers related to servicing fees is recognized over time as our customers benefit from the custody, administration, accounting, transfer agency and other related asset services as they are performed. At contract inception no revenue is estimated as the fees are dependent on assets under custody and administration and/or actual transactions which are susceptible to market factors outside of our control. Therefore, revenue is recognized using a time-based output method as the customers benefit from the services over time and as the assets under custody or transactions are known or determinable during each reporting period based on contractual fee schedules. Payments made to third party service providers, such as sub-custodians, are generally recognized gross as State Street controls those services and is deemed to be a principal in such arrangements.
Trading services revenue includes revenue generated from providing access and use of electronic trading platforms and other trading, transition management and brokerage services. Electronic FX services are dependent on the volume of actual transactions initiated through our electronic exchange platforms. Revenue is recognized over time using a time-based measure as access to, and use of, the electronic exchange platforms is made available to the customer and the activity is determinable. Revenue related to other trading, transition management and brokerage services is recognized when the customer obtains the benefit of such services which may be over time or at a point in time upon trade execution.
Securities finance revenue is related to services for providing agency lending programs to SSGA-managed investment funds and third-party investment managers and asset owners. This securities finance revenue is recognized over time using a time-based measure as our customers benefit from these lending services over time.
State Street Corporation | 91
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Revenue from contracts with customers related to investment management, investment research and investment advisory services provided through SSGA is recognized over time as our customers benefit from the services as they are performed. Substantially all of our investment management fees are determined by the value of assets under management and the investment strategies employed. At contract inception, no revenue is estimated as the fees are dependent on assets under management which are susceptible to market factors outside of our control.
Therefore, substantially all of our Investment Management services revenue is recognized using a time-based output method as the customers benefit from the services over time and as the assets under management are known or determinable during each reporting period based on contractual fee schedules. Payments made to third party service providers, such as payments to others in unitary fee arrangements, are generally recognized on a gross basis when SSGA controls those services and is deemed to be a principal in such transactions.
Revenue by category
In the following table, revenue is disaggregated by our two lines of business and by revenue stream for which the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) | | Topic 606 revenue | | All other revenue | | Total | | Topic 606 revenue | | All other revenue | | Total | | 2018 |
| Servicing fees | | $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,381 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,381 |
|
| Management fees | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | — |
| | 465 |
| | 465 |
|
| Trading services | | 91 |
| | 191 |
| | 282 |
| | 33 |
| | — |
| | 33 |
| | 315 |
|
| Securities finance | | 90 |
| | 64 |
| | 154 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 154 |
|
| Processing fees and other | | 23 |
| | 18 |
| | 41 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 43 |
|
| Total fee revenue | | 1,585 |
| | 273 |
| | 1,858 |
| | 498 |
| | 2 |
| | 500 |
| | 2,358 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net interest income | | — |
| | 663 |
| | 663 |
| | — |
| | (4 | ) | | (4 | ) | | 659 |
|
| Securities gains/ (losses) | | — |
| | 9 |
| | 9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9 |
|
| Total revenue | | $ | 1,585 |
| | $ | 945 |
| | $ | 2,530 |
| | $ | 498 |
| | $ | (2 | ) | | $ | 496 |
| | $ | 3,026 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | Investment Servicing | | Investment Management | | Total |
| (Dollars in millions) | | Topic 606 revenue | | All other revenue | | Total | | Topic 606 revenue | | All other revenue | | Total | | 2018 |
| Servicing fees | | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,802 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,802 |
|
| Management fees | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 937 |
| | — |
| | 937 |
| | 937 |
|
| Trading services | | 186 |
| | 369 |
| | 555 |
| | 64 |
| | — |
| | 64 |
| | 619 |
|
| Securities finance | | 167 |
| | 128 |
| | 295 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 295 |
|
| Processing fees and other | | 43 |
| | 39 |
| | 82 |
| | — |
| | 1 |
| | 1 |
| | 83 |
|
| Total fee revenue | | 3,198 |
| | 536 |
| | 3,734 |
| | 1,001 |
| | 1 |
| | 1,002 |
| | 4,736 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net interest income | | — |
| | 1,311 |
| | 1,311 |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) | | (9 | ) | | 1,302 |
|
| Securities gains/ (losses) | | — |
| | 7 |
| | 7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7 |
|
| Total revenue | | $ | 3,198 |
| | $ | 1,854 |
| | $ | 5,052 |
| | $ | 1,001 |
| | $ | (8 | ) | | $ | 993 |
| | $ | 6,045 |
|
Contract balances and contract costs
As of both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, net receivables of $2.6 billion are included in Accrued interest and fees receivable, representing amounts billed or currently billable to or due from our customers related to revenue from contracts with customers. As performance obligations are satisfied, we have an unconditional right to payment following which billing is generally performed monthly and therefore does not give rise to significant contract assets or liabilities.
No adjustments are made to the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component as the period between when we transfer a promised service to a customer and when the customer pays for that service is expected to be one year or less.
State Street Corporation | 92
STATE STREET CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 19. Non-U.S. Activities
We define our non-U.S. activities as those revenue-producing business activities that arise from clients which are generally serviced or managed outside the U.S. Due to the integrated nature of our business, precise segregation of our U.S. and non-U.S. activities is not possible.
Subjective estimates, assumptions and other judgments are applied to quantify the financial results and assets related to our non-U.S. activities, including our application of funds transfer pricing, our asset-and-liabilityasset and liability management policies and our allocation of certain indirect corporate expenses. Management periodically reviews and updates its processes for quantifying the financial results and assets related to our non-U.S. activities.
The following table presents our U.S. and non-U.S. financial results for the periods indicated:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In millions) | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total |
| Total revenue | $ | 1,219 |
| | $ | 1,627 |
| | $ | 2,846 |
| | $ | 1,117 |
| | $ | 1,503 |
| | $ | 2,620 |
| $ | 1,322 |
| | $ | 1,704 |
| | $ | 3,026 |
| | $ | 1,172 |
| | $ | 1,638 |
| | $ | 2,810 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 342 |
| | 480 |
| | 822 |
| | 314 |
| | 322 |
| | 636 |
| 427 |
| | 438 |
| | 865 |
| | 324 |
| | 452 |
| | 776 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| (In millions) | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total | | Non-U.S. | | U.S. | | Total |
| Total revenue | $ | 3,494 |
| | $ | 4,830 |
| | $ | 8,324 |
| | $ | 3,278 |
| | $ | 4,399 |
| | $ | 7,677 |
| $ | 2,643 |
| | $ | 3,402 |
| | $ | 6,045 |
| | $ | 2,268 |
| | $ | 3,210 |
| | $ | 5,478 |
|
| Income before income taxes | 919 |
| | 1,263 |
| | 2,182 |
| | 835 |
| | 940 |
| | 1,775 |
| 846 |
| | 782 |
| | 1,628 |
| | 583 |
| | 777 |
| | 1,360 |
|
Non-U.S. assets were $81.5$84.9 billion and $86.7$73.2 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Note 20. Subsequent Events
On July 20, 2018 we announced that we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Charles River Development, a provider of investment management front office tools and 2016, respectively.solutions, in an all cash transaction for $2.6 billion. The acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2018. The $2.6 billion purchase price is expected to be financed through the suspension of approximately $950 million of share repurchases in the second quarter of 2018, and during the remainder of 2018, and, subject to market conditions, the remainder of the purchase price through the issuance of equity, with approximately two-third of such equity expected to be in the form of common stock and one-third in preferred stock.
State Street Corporation | 10093
REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Directors of
State Street Corporation
Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated statement of condition of State Street Corporation (the “Corporation”) as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2018, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-and-nine monththree- and six-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the nine-monthsix-month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018 and 2017, and 2016. Thesethe related condensed notes (collectively referred to as the "condensed consolidated interim financial statements"). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management.for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We conducted our reviewhave previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (“PCAOB”), the consolidated statement of condition of the Corporation as of December 31, 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 26, 2018, we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated statement of condition as of December 31, 2017, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of condition from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Corporation in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial informationstatements consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of condition of State Street Corporation as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated February 16, 2017. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated statement of condition of State Street Corporation as of December 31, 2016, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of condition from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 1, 2017July 25, 2018
State Street Corporation | 10194
|
| | | |
| ACRONYMS |
| | | | |
20162017 Form 10-K | State Street Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as amended2017 | GAAPOTC | Generally accepted accounting principlesOver-the-counter |
| ABS | Asset-backed securities | GEAMOTTI | General Electric Asset ManagementOther-than-temporary-impairment |
| AFS | Available-for-sale | G-SIBParent Company | Global systemically important bankState Street Corporation |
| AIFMD | Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive | PCA | Prompt corrective action |
AIRB(1) | Advanced Internal Ratings-Based Approach | P&L | Profit-and-loss |
| ALLL | Allowance for loan and lease losses | HQLA(1)
RC | High-quality liquid assetsRisk Committee |
| AMA | Advanced Measurement Approach | ROE | Return on average common equity |
| AML | Anti-money laundering | HTMRWA(1) | Held-to-maturityRisk-weighted assets |
| AOCI | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | IDISEC | Insured depository institutionSecurities and Exchange Commission |
| ASU | Accounting Standards Update | IFDS U.K.SERP | International Financial Data Services Limited U.K.Supplemental executive retirement plans |
| AUCA | Assets under custody and administration | LCRSLR(1)
| Liquidity coverageSupplementary leverage ratio |
| AUM | Assets under management | LGDSPOE Strategy | Loss given defaultSingle Point of Entry Strategy |
| BCBS | Basel Committee on Banking Supervision | LTDSSGA | Long term debt |
BFDS | Boston Financial Data Services, Inc. | MBS | Mortgage-backed securitiesState Street Global Advisors |
| Board | Board of Directors | MRACSSIF | Management Risk and Capital CommitteeState Street Intermediate Funding, LLC |
| bps | Basis points | NIIState Street Bank | Net interest income |
CAP | Capital adequacy process | NIM | Net interest marginState Street Bank and Trust Company |
| CCAR | Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review | NSFRTLAC(1)
| Net stable funding ratioTotal loss-absorbing capacity |
| CD | Certificates of deposit | OCITMRC | Other comprehensive income (loss)Trading and Markets Risk Committee |
CET1(1) | Common equity tier 1 | OCIOUCITS | Outsourced Chief Investment OfficerUndertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities |
| CLO | Collateralized loan obligations | OFACUOM | OfficeUnit of Foreign Assets Controlmeasure |
| CMO | Collateralized mortgage obligations | VaR | Value-at-Risk |
| CRE | Commercial real estate | OTCVIE | Over-the-counterVariable interest entity |
| CVA | Credit valuation adjustment | OTTI | Other-than-temporary-impairment |
| Dodd-Frank Act | Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act | Parent Company | State Street Corporation |
| DOJ | Department of Justice | PCA | Prompt corrective action |
| DOL | Department of Labor | P&L | Profit-and-loss |
| ECB | European Central Bank | RC | Risk Committee |
| EPS | Earnings per share | ROE | Return on average common equity |
| ERISA | Employee Retirement Income Security Act | RWA(1)
| Risk-weighted assets |
| ERM | Enterprise Risk Management | SEC | Securities and Exchange Commission |
| ETF | Exchange-Traded Fund | SERP | Supplemental executive retirement plans |
| EVE | Economic value of equity | SLR(1)
| Supplementary leverage ratio |
FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board | SPOE Strategy | Single Point of Entry Strategy |
| FCA | Financial Conduct Authority | SSGA | State Street Global Advisors |
| FDIC | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | SSIF | State Street Intermediate Funding, LLC |
| Federal Reserve | Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System | State Street Bank | State Street Bank and Trust Company |
| FHLB | Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston | TLAC(1)
| Total loss-absorbing capacity |
FHLMCForm 10-Q | Federal Home Loan MortgageState Street Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q | TMRC | Trading and Markets Risk Committee |
FNMA | Federal National Mortgage Association | UOM | Unit of measure |
| FRBB | Federal Reserve Bank of Boston | VaR | Value-at-Risk |
| FSB | Financial Stability Board | VIE | Variable interest entity |
| FX | Foreign exchange | | |
| GAAP | Generally accepted accounting principles | | |
| G-SIB | Global systemically important bank | | |
HQLA(1) | High-quality liquid assets | | |
| HTM | Held-to-maturity | | |
| IDI | Insured depository institution | | |
LCR(1) | Liquidity coverage ratio | | |
| LTD | Long term debt | | |
| MBS | Mortgage-backed securities | | |
| MiFID II | Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II | | |
| MiFIR | Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation | | |
| MRAC | Management Risk and Capital Committee | | |
| NII | Net interest income | | |
| NIM | Net interest margin | | |
NSFR(1) | Net stable funding ratio | | |
| OCI | Other comprehensive income (loss) | | |
| OCIO | Outsourced Chief Investment Officer | | |
| OFAC | Office of Foreign Assets Control | | |
| | | | |
State Street Corporation | 10295
|
| |
| GLOSSARY |
| | |
| | |
Asset-backed securities: A financial security backed by collateralized assets, other than real estate or mortgage backed securities.
Assets under custody and administration: Assets that we hold directly or indirectly on behalf of clients under a safekeeping or custody arrangement or for which we provide administrative services for clients. To the extent that we provide more than one AUCA service for a client’s assets, the value of the asset is only counted once in the total amount of AUCA.
Assets under management: The total market value of client assets for which we provide investment management strategy services, advisory services and/or distribution services generating management fees based on a percentage of the assets’ market values. These client assets are not included on our balance sheet.
Beacon: A multi-year program, announced in October 2015, to create cost efficiencies through changes in our operational processes and to further digitize our processes and interfaces with our clients.
Certificates of deposit: A savings certificate with a fixed maturity date, specified fixed interest rate and can be issued in any denomination aside from minimum investment requirements. A CD restricts access to the funds until the maturity date of the investment.
Collateralized loan obligations: A security backed by a pool of debt, primarily senior secured leveraged loans. CLOs are similar to collateralized mortgage obligations, except for the different type of underlying loan. With a CLO, the investor receives scheduled debt payments from the underlying loans, assuming most of the risk in the event borrowers default, but is offered greater diversity and the potential for higher-than-average returns.
Commercial real estate: Property intended to generate profit from capital gains or rental income. Our CRE loans are primarily composed of loans acquired in 2008 pursuant to indemnified repurchase agreements with an affiliate of Lehman Brothers.
Deposit beta: A measure of how much of an interest rate increase is expected to be passed on to client interest-bearing accounts, on average
Economic value of equity: Long-term interest rate risk measure designed to estimate the fair value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments based on a discounted cash flow model.
Exchange-Traded Fund: A type of exchange-traded investment product that offer investors a way to pool their money in a fund that makes investments in stocks, bonds, or other assets and, in return, to receive an interest in that investment pool. ETF shares are traded on a national stock exchange and at market prices that may or may not be the same as the net asset value.
Global systemically important bank: A financial institution whose distress or disorderly failure, because of its size, complexity and systemic interconnectedness, would cause significant disruption to the wider financial system and economic activity, which will be subject to additional capital requirements.
Held-to-maturity investment securities: We classify investments in debt securities as held-to-maturity only if we have the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Investments in debt securities classified as held-to-maturity are measured subsequently at amortized cost in the statement of financial position.
| High-quality liquid assets: Cash or assets that can be converted into cash at little or no loss of value in private markets and are considered unencumbered.
Investment-grade: Loans and leases that consist of counterparties with strong credit quality and low expected credit risk and probability of default. Ratings apply to counterparties with a strong capacity to support the timely repayment of any financial commitment.
Liquidity coverage ratio: A Basel III framework requirement for banks and bank holding companies to measure liquidity. It is designed to ensure that certain banking institutions, including us, maintain a minimum amount of unencumbered HQLA sufficient to withstand the net cash outflow under a hypothetical standardized acute liquidity stress scenario for a 30-day stress period. The ratio of our encumbered high-quality liquid assets divided by our total net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period.
Net asset value: The amount of net assets attributable to each share of capital stock (other than senior securities, such as, preferred stock) outstanding at the close of the period.
Net stable funding ratio: The ratio of the amount of available stable funding relative to the amount of required stable funding. This ratio should be equal to at least 100% on an ongoing basis.
Other-than-temporary-impairment: Impairment charge taken on a security whose fair value has fallen below its carrying value on balance sheet and its value is not expected to recover through the holding period of the security.
Qualified financial contracts:Probability of default: Securities contracts, commodity contracts, forward contracts, repurchase agreements, swap agreements and any other contract determined byAn internal risk rating that indicates the FDIC to belikelihood that a qualified financial contract.credit obligor will enter into default status.
Risk-weighted assets: A measurement used to quantify risk inherent in our on and off-balance sheet assets by adjusting the asset value for risk. RWA is used in the calculation of our risk-based capital ratios.
Special mention: Loans and leases that consist of counterparties with potential weaknesses that, if uncorrected, may result in deterioration of repayment prospects.
Speculative: Loans and leases that consist of counterparties that face ongoing uncertainties or exposure to business, financial, or economic downturns. However, these counterparties may have financial flexibility or access to financial alternatives, which allow for financial commitments to be met.
Supplementary leverage ratio: The ratio of our tier 1 capital to our total leverage exposure, which measures our capital adequacy relative to our on and off-balance sheet assets.
Total loss-absorbing capacity: The sum of our tier 1 regulatory capital plus eligible external long-term debt issued by us.
Value-at-Risk: Statistical model used to measure the potential loss in value of a portfolio that could occur in normal markets condition, over a defined holding period, within a certain confidence level.
Variable interest entity: An entity that: (1) lacks enough equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional financial support from other parties; (2) has equity owners that lack the right to make significant decisions affecting the entity’s operations; and/or (3) has equity owners that do not have an obligation to absorb or the right to receive the entity’s losses or return.
|
State Street Corporation | 10396
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In the normal course of our business activities, we are exposed to a variety of risks. The following description of risk factors consists of updates to the risk factors associated with our business previously disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A of the 2017 Form 10-K. Please refer to those previously disclosed risk factors, in addition to the below risk factors and our other disclosures in our SEC filings, when considering the risks and uncertainties associated with our business activities. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements and should be read in conjunction with Part 1, Financial Information of this Form 10-Q. These risk factors may be important to understanding other statements in this Form 10-Q.
Consummation of our planned acquisition of Charles River Development is subject to the satisfaction of closing conditions and regulatory approvals, the failure of which may prevent or delay the consummation of the acquisition.
On July 20, 2018, we announced that we had entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Charles River Development, a provider of investment management front office tools and solutions. The acquisition is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2018, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions and regulatory approvals. We cannot provide any assurance that all of the closing conditions will be satisfied or waived, nor can we provide any assurance that all necessary regulatory approvals will be obtained. The failure to satisfy some or all of the required conditions or the failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals could delay the completion of the acquisition for a significant period of time or prevent it from occurring.
We propose to finance the acquisition in part through the issuance of common stock and preferred stock; however, the closing of the acquisition is not conditioned upon such financing, and such financing may not be available on terms consistent with our expectations or at all. We bear the risk that such equity issuances are not successful, including without limitation, the financial risks and risks associated with our capital structure and regulatory compliance. In addition, if completed, the effects of such financing may be more dilutive to our existing shareholders than contemplated when we entered into the acquisition agreement.
Even if we successfully consummate our planned acquisition of Charles River Development, we may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction or the benefits may take longer to realize than expected
Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the planned acquisition will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to integrate Charles River Development into our business and realize anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies. The integration of Charles River Development into our business will be a complex, costly and time-consuming process, and our management may face significant challenges in implementing such integration, including, without limitation, challenges related to:
retaining Charles River Development’s current clients, some of which are our competitors;
integrating Charles River Development’s software solutions with our existing products and services and related operations and systems, including performance, risk and compliance analytics, investment manager operations outsourcing, accounting, administration and custody;
retaining key employees of Charles River Development;
implementing our plans to develop an integrated front-to-middle-to-back office platform that is competitive and meets our clients’ requirements; and
accelerating the development of enhancements to the features and functions of Charles River Development’s software solutions.
Any delay or failure in achieving any of the foregoing could adversely impact the expected benefits of the acquisition.
State Street Corporation | 97
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) In June 2017, our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $1.4 billion of our common stock through June 30, 2018 (the 2017 Program). In June 2018, our Board approved a common stock purchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $1.2 billion of our common stock through June 30, 2019 (the 2018 Program).
Stock purchases may be made using various types of mechanisms, including open market purchases, accelerated share repurchases or transactions off
market, and may be made under Rule 10b5-1 trading programs. The timing of stock purchases, types of transactions and number of
shares purchased will depend on several factors, including market conditions and State Street’s capital positions, financial performance and investment opportunities. Our common stock purchase programs do not have specific price targets and may be suspended at any time.
The following table presents purchases of our common stock under the 2017 Program and related information for each of the monthsNo shares were repurchased in the second quarter ended September 30, 2017.of 2018. In connection with our proposed acquisition of Charles River Development, we do not plan to repurchase shares for the remainder of 2018. We may employ third-party broker/dealers to acquire shares on the open market in connection with our common stock
purchase programs.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts, shares in thousands) | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid Per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under Publicly Announced Program |
| Period: | | | | | | | | |
| July 1 - July 31, 2017 | | 158 |
| | $ | 93.42 |
| | 158 |
| | $ | 1,385 |
|
| August 1 - August 31, 2017 | | 2,399 |
| | 93.38 |
| | 2,399 |
| | 1,161 |
|
| September 1 - September 30, 2017 | | 1,191 |
| | 93.41 |
| | 1,191 |
| | 1,050 |
|
| Total | | 3,748 |
| | $ | 93.39 |
| | 3,748 |
| | $ | 1,050 |
|
State Street Corporation | 10498
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
| | | |
| Exhibit No. | | Exhibit Description |
| | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| * | 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| | | | |
| * | 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| | | | |
| * | 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| * | 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| * | 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document |
| | | | |
| * | 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
| | |
| † | | Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
| * | | Submitted electronically herewith |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) consolidated statement of income for the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, (ii) consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, (iii) consolidated statement of condition as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, (iv) consolidated statement of changes in shareholders' equity for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, (v) consolidated statement of cash flows for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, and (vi) notes to consolidated financial statements.
State Street Corporation | 10599
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | STATE STREET CORPORATION |
| | | | | | (Registrant) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Date: | November 1, 2017July 25, 2018 | | By: | | /s/ ERIC W. ABOAF |
| | | | | | Eric W. Aboaf, |
| | | | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Date: | November 1, 2017July 25, 2018 | | By: | | /s/ EILIZABETHAN MW. SACHAEFERPPLEYARD |
| | | | | | Elizabeth M. Schaefer,Ian W. Appleyard, |
| | | | | | SeniorExecutive Vice President, DeputyGlobal Controller and Interim Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
| | | | | | |
State Street Corporation | 106100