THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
17. Subsequent Events
On July 26, 2007, the company entered into an agreement to acquire Qualigens Fine Chemicals, a division of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (GSK India) based in Mumbai for 2.4 billion Indian Rupees (approximately $60 million). The Laboratory Products and Services segment completed this acquisition on September 30, 2007. Qualigens is India’s largest laboratory chemical manufacturer and supplier, serving customers in a variety of industries, including pharmaceutical, petrochemical and food and beverage. Qualigens’ revenues totaled $24 million in 2006.
On October 3, 2007, the Laboratory Products and Services segment acquired Priority Solutions International, a leading third-party logistics provider to the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. The purchase price totaled $165 million in cash. Priority Solutions’ revenues totaled $96 million in 2006.
On October 9, 2007, the Analytical Technologies segment acquired NanoDrop Technologies, Inc., a supplier of UV-Vis spectrophotometry and fluorescence scientific instruments to the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries. The purchase price totaled approximately $146 million, net of cash acquired, plus up to $20 million of additional contingent consideration based upon the achievement of specified operating results in 2007 and 2008. NanoDrop’s revenues totaled $27 million in 2006.
Item 2 — Management’s2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are made throughout this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. While the company may elect to update forward-looking statements in the future, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so, even if the company’s estimates change, and readers should not rely on those forward-looking statements as representing the company’s views as of any date subsequent to the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report. There are a
A number of important factors that could cause the actual results of the company to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, including those detailed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this report on Form 10-Q.
Overview of Results of Operations and Liquidity
The company develops, manufactures and sells a broad range of products that are sold worldwide. The company expands the product lines and services it offers by developing and commercializing its own core technologies and by making strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses. Following the November 2006 merger with Fisher Scientific International Inc., theThe company’s continuing operations fall into two business segments: Analytical Technologies and Laboratory Products and Services. During the first quarter of 2008, the company transferred management responsibility and related financial reporting and monitoring for several small product lines between segments. The company has historically moved a product line between segments when a shift in strategic focus of either the product line or a segment more closely aligns the product line with a segment different than that in which it had previously been reported. Prior period segment information has been reclassified to reflect these transfers.
Revenues
| | Three Months Ended | | Nine Months Ended | |
(Dollars in millions) | | September 29, 2007 | | September 30, 2006 | | September 29, 2007 | | September 30, 2006 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 1,044.2 | | | 43.5% | | $ | 540.7 | | | 74.6% | | $ | 3,088.9 | | | 43.4% | | $ | 1,576.8 | | | 74.3% | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 1,446.5 | | | 60.2% | | | 184.2 | | | 25.4% | | | 4,296.7 | | | 60.3% | | | 545.9 | | | 25.7% | |
Eliminations | | | (89.5 | ) | | (3.7%) | | | — | | | 0.0% | | | (260.3 | ) | | (3.7%) | | | — | | | 0.0% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,401.2 | | | 100% | | $ | 724.9 | | | 100% | | $ | 7,125.3 | | | 100% | | $ | 2,122.7 | | | 100% | |
Revenues
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Overview of Results of Operations and Liquidity (continued) | | Three Months Ended | |
(Dollars in millions) | | March 29, 2008 | | | March 31, 2007 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 1,087.4 | | | | 42.6% | | | $ | 988.3 | | | | 42.3% | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 1,568.4 | | | | 61.4% | | | | 1,433.5 | | | | 61.3% | |
Eliminations | | | (101.8 | ) | | | (4.0)% | | | | (83.6 | ) | | | (3.6)% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,554.0 | | | | 100% | | | $ | 2,338.2 | | | | 100% | |
Sales in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 were $2.40$2.55 billion, an increase of $1.68 billion$216 million from the thirdfirst quarter of 2006. Sales increased principally due to the merger with Fisher and, to a lesser extent, increased demand and the favorable effect of currency translation. If the merger with Fisher had occurred on January 1, 2006, revenues would have increased $164 million (7%), over pro forma 2006 revenues.2007. Aside from the effects of acquisitions, divestitures and currency translation (discussed in total and by segment below), revenues increased over pro forma 20062007 revenues by $111$89 million due to higher revenues at existing businesses as a result of increased demand, discussed below, and, to a lesser extent, price increases.
The company’s strategy is to augment internal growth at existing businesses with complementary acquisitions such as those completed in 2007 and 2006. In addition to the merger with Fisher, the2007. The principal acquisitions included the instrument sales business of Davis Inotek Instruments, LLC,La-Pha-Pack, a manufacturer and provider of test, measurementchromatography consumables and process control instrumentsrelated accessories in SeptemberDecember 2007; Spectronex AGPriority Solutions International, a third-party provider to the pharmaceutical and Flux AG businesses of Swiss Analytic Group AG, a distributor of mass spectrometry, chromatography and surface science instruments and a manufacturer of high performance liquid chromography pumps and softwarehealthcare industries in JanuaryOctober 2007; CohesiveNanoDrop Technologies, Inc., a providersupplier of advanced sample extractionUV-Vis spectrophotometry and liquid chromatography productsfluorescence scientific instruments in December 2006;October 2007 and EGS Gauging, Inc.,Qualigens Fine Chemicals, a providerchemical manufacturer and supplier in September 2007.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Overview of flat polymer web gauging products, which was acquired in June 2006. Subsequent to the third quarterResults of 2007, the company completed additional acquisitions (Note 17).Operations and Liquidity (continued)
In the thirdfirst quarter of 2007,2008, the company’s operating income and operating income margin were $254$290 million and 10.6%11.4%, respectively, compared with $75$192 million and 10.4%8.2%, respectively, in 2006.2007. (Operating income margin is operating income divided by revenues.) The increase in operating income was due to the Fisher merger and, to a lesser extent, higher profitability at existing businesses resulting from incremental revenues including price increases, merger integration savings and productivity improvements.improvements including material sourcing and lower operating costs following restructuring actions. The increase also resulted from $38 million of lower restructuring and other charges in 2008, principally due to lower merger-related cost of revenues charges. These increases were offset in part by $115a $12 million of higherincrease in amortization expense as a result of acquisition-related intangible assets from the Fisher merger and other2007 acquisitions.
The company’s effective tax rate was 7.1%15.9% and 29.6%16.2% in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The tax provision in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 was favorably affected by a one-time benefit$9.6 million or 3.4 percentage points resulting from the impact on deferred tax balances of enacted reductions in tax rates in the U.K., Denmark and Germany on the company’s deferred tax balances. This benefit totaled $21 million. In addition toSwitzerland. Aside from the impact of this item, the decrease in the effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2007 compared with the third quarter of 2006 was primarily due to geographic changesunfavorably affected by an increase in profits, in particular lower income in the United States due to charges and amortization associated with the Fisher merger, together with the impact of an enhancedhigher tax credit for qualifying U.S. research costs and growth in lower tax regions such as Asia. The company currently expects its tax rate for the full year to be approximately 16% before the effect of the one-time benefit discussed above.jurisdictions.
Income from continuing operations increased to $219$233 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 2007,2008, from $49$139 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 2006,2007, primarily due to the items discussed above that increased operating income in 2007 and the one-time tax benefit discussed above,2008, offset in part by higherlower interest expense primarily associated with debt assumed in the Fisher merger.and higher other income, discussed below.
During the first nine monthsquarter of 2007,2008, the company’s cash flow from operations totaled $948$243 million, compared with $200$219 million for the first nine monthsquarter of 2006.2007. The increase resulted from cash flow from the Fisher businesses and, to a lesser extent, improved cash flow at existing businesses.businesses offset in part by an increase in working capital items.
As of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, the company’s outstanding debt totaled $2.20 billion, of which approximately 93% is due in 20092010 and thereafter. The company expects that its existing cash and short-term investments of $846$748 million as of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, and the company’s future cash flow from operations together with available unsecured borrowing capacity of up to $956$955 million under its existing 5-year revolving credit agreement, are sufficient to meet the working capital requirements of its existing businesses for the foreseeable future, including at least the next 24 months.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management believes the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to the consolidated financial statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the company’s Form 10-K for 2006,2007, describe the significant accounting estimates and policies used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates. As discussed below and in Note 13, the company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” on January 1, 2007. Other than this change, thereThere have been no significant changes in the company’s critical accounting policies during the first ninethree months of 2007.2008.
In the ordinary courseResults of business there is inherent uncertainty in quantifying the company’s income tax positions. The company assesses income tax positions and records tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, the company has recorded the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit has been recognized in the financial statements. Where applicable, associated interest expense has also been recognized.Operations
Results of OperationsFirst Quarter 2008 Compared With First Quarter 2007
Third Quarter 2007 Compared With Third Quarter 2006
Continuing Operations
Sales in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 were $2.40$2.55 billion, an increase of $1.68 billion$216 million from the thirdfirst quarter of 2006.2007. Sales increased principally due to the merger with Fisher and, to a lesser extent, increased demand and the favorable effect of currency translation. If the merger with Fisher had occurred on January 1, 2006, revenues would have increased $164 million (7%) over pro forma 2006 revenues, including increases of $53$41 million due to theacquisitions, net of divestitures. The favorable effecteffects of currency translation resulted in an increase in revenues of $86 million in 2008. Aside from the effect of acquisitions, net of divestitures, and $111currency translation, revenues increased $89 million primarily due to higher revenues at existing businesses as a result of increased demand and, to a lesser extent, price increases.increases, as described by segment below. Growth was strong in Asia, andmoderate in North America and modestapproximately flat in Europe, following a strong first quarter 2007 in Europe.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Quarter 2008 Compared With First Quarter 2007 (continued)
In the thirdfirst quarter of 2007,2008, operating income and operating income margin were $254$290 million and 10.6%11.4%, respectively, compared with $75$192 million and 10.4%8.2%, respectively, in the thirdfirst quarter of 2006.2007. The increase in operating income was due to inclusion of the Fisher businesses and, to a lesser extent, higher profitability at existing businesses resulting from incremental revenues including price increases, merger integration savings and productivity improvements.improvements including material sourcing and lower operating costs following restructuring actions. The increase also resulted from $38 million of lower restructuring and other charges in 2008, principally due to lower merger-related cost of revenues charges. These increases were offset in part by $115a $12 million of higherincrease in amortization expense as a result of acquisition-related intangible assets from the Fisher merger.
Restructuring and other costs were recorded during the third quarter of 2007 and 2006. Restructuring costs in the 2007 period include merger-related exit costs at existing businesses. The company has substantially finalized its plan for restructuring actions at Fisher or within existing businesses with which Fisher is being integrated. Such actions have included rationalization of product lines, consolidation of facilities and reductions in staffing levels. The cost of actions at Fisher businesses has been charged to the cost of the acquisition, while the cost of actions at existing businesses being integrated with Fisher is charged to restructuring expense.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Third Quarter 2007 Compared With Third Quarter 2006 (continued)acquisitions.
In the thirdfirst quarter of 2008, the company recorded restructuring and other costs, net, of $5.5 million, including $0.6 million of charges to cost of revenues, related to the sale of inventories revalued at the date of acquisition and accelerated depreciation on manufacturing assets to be abandoned due to facility consolidations. The company incurred $5.6 million of cash costs primarily for severance and abandoned facility expenses at businesses that have been consolidated and recorded $0.7 million of gains associated with the sale of businesses prior to 2008 (Note 11). In the first quarter of 2007, the company recorded restructuring and other costs, net, of $9$43.8 million, including $7$36.4 million of charges to cost of revenues, substantially all related to the sale of inventories revalued at the date of acquisition (principally Fisher). The company incurred $7.3 million of cash costs, primarily for severance, abandoned facilities and relocation expenses at businesses that have been consolidated. In addition, the company recorded a $2 million loss on the sale of a small business unit (Note 11). In the third quarter of 2006, the company recorded restructuring and other costs, net, of $7 million, including $2 million of charges to cost of revenues primarily for accelerated depreciation on fixed assets abandoned due to facility consolidations and $6 million of cash costs, primarily for severance, abandoned facilities and relocation expenses at businesses that have been consolidated. These costs were offset by $1 million of net gains on the disposal of abandoned property.consolidated as well as merger-related costs.
In addition to the charges above, on October 31, 2007, the company decided to undertake closure of a Laboratory Products and Services segment manufacturing facility in France. The operations of the factory will be consolidated with those of existing factories in a phased plan through mid-2009. The company estimates future charges for severance, retention, real estate abandonment, moving costs and asset write-offs associated with this action will total $16-18 million, including cash costs of $15 - $17 million, which will be recorded between the fourth quarter of 2007 and mid-2009, when the facility ceases remaining operations.
Segment Results
The company’s management evaluates segment operating performance using operating income before certain charges to cost of revenues, principally associated with acquisition accounting; restructuring and other costs/income including costs arising from facility consolidations such as severance and abandoned lease expense and gains and losses from the sale of real estate and product lines; and amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets. The company uses these measures because they help management understand and evaluate the segments’ core operating results and facilitate comparison of performance for determining compensation (Note 3). Accordingly, the following segment data is reported on this basis.
| | Three Months Ended | | | | Three Months Ended | |
(In millions) | | September 29, 2007 | | September 30, 2006 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | March 29, | | | March 31, | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 1,044.2 | | $ | 540.7 | | | $ | 1,087.4 | | | $ | 988.3 | | | 10% | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 1,446.5 | | | 184.2 | | | | 1,568.4 | | | 1,433.5 | | | 9% | |
Eliminations | | | (89.5 | ) | | — | | | | (101.8 | ) | | | (83.6 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Revenues | | $ | 2,401.2 | | $ | 724.9 | | | $ | 2,554.0 | | | $ | 2,338.2 | | | | 9% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income: | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 202.5 | | $ | 80.8 | | | $ | 228.7 | | | $ | 185.4 | | | 23% | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 202.2 | | | 27.9 | | | | 218.4 | | | | 190.1 | | | | 15% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Reportable Segments | | | 404.7 | | | 108.7 | | | | 447.1 | | | 375.5 | | | 19% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenues Charges | | | (0.4 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | | | (0.6 | ) | | (36.4 | ) | | | |
Restructuring and Other Costs, Net | | | (8.8 | ) | | (5.2 | ) | | | (4.9 | ) | | (7.4 | ) | | | |
Amortization of Acquisition-related Intangible Assets | | | (141.5 | ) | | (26.4 | ) | | | (151.2 | ) | | | (139.3 | ) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consolidated Operating Income | | $ | 254.0 | | $ | 75.1 | | | $ | 290.4 | | | $ | 192.4 | | | | 51% | |
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
ThirdFirst Quarter 20072008 Compared With ThirdFirst Quarter 20062007 (continued)
Other Expense, Net
The company reported other expense, net, of $19$13 million and $6$27 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively (Note 4). Other expense, net, includes interest income, interest expense, equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries and other items, net. Interest income increased to $14$10 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 from $3$9 million in the same period of 2006,2007, primarily due to higher invested cash balances from operating cash flow, offset in part by cash used to fund acquisitions and to repurchase the company’s common stock. Interest expense decreased to $30 million in the first quarter of 2008 from $37 million in the first quarter of 2007, primarily as a result of a reduction in short-term borrowings and, to a lesser extent, increased marketlower interest rates. Interest expense increased to $32 million in the third quarter of 2007 from $9 million in the third quarter of 2006, primarily as a result of debt assumed in the merger with Fisher.rates on variable rate debt. In August 2007, the FASB issued proposed guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that, if enacted, would increase the company’s reported interest expense in a manner that reflects interest rates of similar nonconvertiblenon-convertible debt. In March 2008, the FASB directed its staff to draft a final rule on this matter. The rule change would not affect the company’s cash interest payments. There can be no assurance at this time, however, as to the content of any final FASB rules on this topic. The company had $8 million of other income in the first quarter of 2008 compared with $2 million in the first quarter of 2007. The increase primarily resulted from net currency transaction gains.
Provision for Income Taxes
The company’s effective tax rate was 7.1%15.9% and 29.6%16.2% in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 and 2006,2007, respectively. The tax provision in the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 was favorably affected by a one-time benefit$9.6 million or 3.4 percentage points resulting from the impact on deferred tax balances of $21 million, discussed below. In addition toenacted reductions in tax rates in Switzerland. Aside from the impact of this item, the decrease in the effective tax rate in 2007 compared with 2006 was primarily due to geographic changesunfavorably affected by an increase in profits, in particular lower income in the United States due to charges and amortization associated with the Fisher merger, together with the impact of an enhancedhigher tax credit for qualifying U.S. research costs and growth in lower tax regions such as Asia. The company currently expects its tax rate for the full year to be approximately 16% prior to the one-time benefit discussed below.jurisdictions.
On July 19, 2007, the United Kingdom enacted new tax legislation that will become effective on April 1, 2008, lowering its corporate tax rate. Denmark and Germany also enacted new tax legislation, with various effective dates, that will reduce the corporate tax rate. As a result of these changes in tax rates, the deferred tax balances of all the company’s entities in these countries have been adjusted to reflect the new tax rates in the third quarter of 2007.
Contingent Liabilities
At the first quarter end of the third quarter of 2007,2008, the company was contingently liable with respect to certain legal proceedings and related matters. As described under “Litigation and Related Contingencies” in Note 12, an unfavorable outcome in one or more of the matters described therein could materially affect the company’s financial position as well as its results of operations and cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 iswas effective for the companycompany’s monetary assets and liabilities in 2008.the first quarter of 2008 and for other assets and liabilities in 2009 (Note 9). The company is currently evaluating the potential impact on its disclosures concerning nonmonetary assets and liabilities of adopting SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to measure eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The fair value measurement election is irrevocable once made and subsequent changes in fair value must be recorded in earnings. The effect of adoption will be reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings.company adopted SFAS No. 159 beginning January 1, 2008. Adoption of the standard did not result in any change in the valuation of the company’s assets and liabilities.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141R does the following: requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Quarter 2008 Compared With First Quarter 2007 (continued)
assets acquired and liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose certain information to enable users to understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. The statement requires that cash outflows such as transaction costs and post-acquisition restructuring be charged to expense instead of capitalized as a cost of the acquisition. Contingent purchase price will be recorded at its initial fair value and then re-measured as time passes through adjustments to net income. SFAS No. 141R is effective for the company beginning January 1, 2008.in 2009. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this standard.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Third Quarter 2007 Compared With Third Quarter 2006 (continued)adoption.
Discontinued Operations
During 2006,In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting for minority interests, which will be reclassified as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 is effective for the company committed toin 2009. The company does not expect a plan to disposematerial effect from adoption of Genevac Limited (Genevac), a legacy Fisher business that is a manufacturer of solvent evaporation technology. The decision followed the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) consent order that required divesture of Genevac for FTC approval of the Thermo Fisher merger under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act. Genevac was sold on April 3, 2007, for net proceeds of $22 million in cash, subject to a post-closing adjustment. The results of discontinued operations also include the results of Systems Manufacturing Corporation (SMC), a legacy Fisher business that provides consoles, workstations and server enclosures for information technology operations and data centers. SMC was sold in July 2007 for cash proceeds of $2.5 million. The operating results of Genevac and SMC were not material in 2007 through their dates of sale.
First Nine Months 2007 Compared With First Nine Months 2006
Continuing Operations
Sales in the first nine months of 2007 were $7.13 billion, an increase of $5.00 billion from the first nine months of 2006. Sales increased principally due to the merger with Fisher as well as other acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, increased demand and the favorable effect of currency translation. If the merger with Fisher had occurred on January 1, 2006, revenues would have increased $603 million (9%) over pro forma 2006 revenues, including increases of a) $86 million due to acquisitions made by the combined companies, net of divestitures, b) $150 million due to the favorable effect of currency translation and c) $367 million due to higher revenues at existing businesses as a result of increased demand and, to a lesser extent, price increases. Growth was strong in each of the company’s principal geographic regions.this standard.
In March 2008, the first nine monthsFASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 161 requires disclosures of 2007, operating incomehow and operating income margin were $689 millionwhy an entity uses derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and 9.7%, respectively, compared with $215 millionrelated hedged items are accounted for; and 10.1%, respectively, in the first nine months of 2006. The increase in operating income was due to inclusion of the Fisher businesseshow derivative instruments and to a lesser extent, higher profitability at existing businesses resulting from incremental revenues, price increasesrelated hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and productivity improvements. These increases were offset in part by $345 million of higher amortization expense as a result of acquisition-related intangible assets from the Fisher merger and $45 million of higher charges to cost of revenues, principallycash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for the salecompany in 2009. The company does not expect a material effect from adoption of inventories revalued at the date of the merger. The decrease in operating income margin was primarily due to the $45 million of higher charges to cost of revenues associated with inventories revalued at the date of merger.this standard.
Restructuring and other costs were recorded during the first nine months of 2007 and 2006. Restructuring costs in the 2007 period primarily include merger-related exit costs at existing businesses. In the first nine months of 2007, the company recorded restructuring and other costs, net, of $73 million, including $48 million of charges to cost of revenues, substantially all related to the sale of inventories revalued at the date of acquisition (principally Fisher). The company incurred $22 million of cash costs, primarily for severance, abandoned facilities and relocation expenses at businesses that have been consolidated as well as merger-related costs, recorded as incurred. The company also recorded $2 million of loss on sale of a small business unit (Note 11). In the first nine months of 2006, the company recorded restructuring and other costs, net, of $17 million, including $3 million of charges to cost of revenues primarily for accelerated depreciation on fixed assets abandoned due to facility consolidations and $15 million of cash costs, primarily for severance, abandoned facilities and relocation expenses at businesses that have been consolidated. In addition, the company recorded a net gain of $1 million from disposal of product lines and the sale of abandoned assets.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Nine Months 2007 Compared With First Nine Months 2006 (continued)
Segment Results
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 29, | | September 30, | |
(In millions) | | 2007 | | 2006 | |
| | | | | | | |
Revenues: | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 3,088.9 | | $ | 1,576.8 | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 4,296.7 | | | 545.9 | |
Eliminations | | | (260.3 | ) | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
Consolidated Revenues | | $ | 7,125.3 | | $ | 2,122.7 | |
| | | | | | | |
Operating Income: | | | | | | | |
Analytical Technologies | | $ | 598.0 | | $ | 229.8 | |
Laboratory Products and Services | | | 586.8 | | | 79.8 | |
| | | | | | | |
Subtotal Reportable Segments | | | 1,184.8 | | | 309.6 | |
| | | | | | | |
Cost of Revenues Charges | | | (48.0 | ) | | (3.3 | ) |
Restructuring and Other Costs, Net | | | (24.5 | ) | | (13.6 | ) |
Amortization of Acquisition-related Intangible Assets | | | (422.9 | ) | | (77.6 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Consolidated Operating Income | | $ | 689.4 | | $ | 215.1 | |
Analytical Technologies
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 29, | | September 30, | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 3,088.9 | | $ | 1,576.8 | | | 96% | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income Margin | | | 19.4% | | | 14.6% | | | 4.8 pts. | |
Sales in the Analytical Technologies segment increased $1.51 billion to $3.09 billion in the first nine months of 2007 primarily due to the merger with Fisher and other acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, increased revenues at existing businesses and favorable currency translation. Had the Fisher merger occurred on January 1, 2006, revenues would have increased $370 million (14%) over pro forma 2006 revenues, including increases of a) $79 million due to acquisitions made by the combined companies, net of divestitures, b) $86 million due to the favorable effect of currency translation and c) $205 million due to increased revenue at existing businesses as a result of increased demand and, to a lesser extent, higher prices. The increase in demand was from life science and industrial customers in part due to strong market response to new products. Growth was particularly strong in sales of mass spectrometry and spectroscopy instruments as well as environmental monitoring instruments and, to a lesser extent, diagnostic tools.
Operating income margin was 19.4% in the first nine months of 2007 and 14.6% in the first nine months of 2006. The increase resulted from profit on incremental revenues and, to a lesser extent, price increases and productivity improvements, including cost-reduction measures following restructuring actions. Had the merger with Fisher occurred on January 1, 2006, operating income margin would have been 17.0% in the first nine months of 2006.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Nine Months 2007 Compared With First Nine Months 2006 (continued)
Laboratory Products and Services
| | Nine Months Ended | |
| | September 29, | | September 30, | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | | 2007 | | 2006 | | Change | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 4,296.7 | | $ | 545.9 | | | 687% | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Income Margin | | | 13.7% | | | 14.6% | | | (0.9) pts. | |
Sales in the Laboratory Products and Services segment increased $3.75 billion to $4.30 billion in the first nine months of 2007 primarily due to the merger with Fisher and other acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, increased revenues at existing businesses and favorable currency translation. Had the Fisher merger occurred on January 1, 2006, revenues would have increased $261 million (6%) over pro forma 2006 revenues, including increases of a) $8 million due to acquisitions made by the combined companies, net of divestitures, b) $64 million due to the favorable effect of currency translation and c) $189 million due to increased revenue at existing businesses as a result of increased demand and, to a lesser extent, higher prices. Sales made through the segment’s research market channel and revenues from the company’s biopharma outsourcing offerings were particularly strong.
Operating income margin decreased to 13.7% in the first nine months of 2007 from 14.6% in the first nine months of 2006, primarily due to the inclusion of Fisher revenues, which have a slightly lower operating margin than the company’s legacy laboratory equipment business, offset in part by price increases and productivity improvements, including restructuring actions. Had the merger with Fisher occurred on January 1, 2006, operating income margin would have been 12.1% in the first nine months of 2006.
Other Expense, Net
The company reported other expense, net, of $66 million and $13 million in the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively (Note 4). Interest income increased to $33 million in the first nine months of 2007 from $10 million in the same period of 2006, primarily due to higher invested cash balances from operating cash flow and, to a lesser extent, increased market interest rates. Interest expense increased to $103 million in the first nine months of 2007 from $25 million in the first nine months of 2006, primarily as a result of debt assumed in the merger with Fisher.
Provision for Income Taxes
The company’s effective tax rate was 12.5% and 30.1% in the first nine months of 2007 and 2006, respectively. The tax provision in the first nine months of 2007 was favorably affected by a one-time benefit, discussed in the results of the third quarter, of enacted reductions in the tax rates in the U.K., Denmark and Germany on the company’s deferred tax balances. The benefit totaled $21 million. In addition, to the impact of this item the decrease in the effective tax rate in 2007 compared with 2006 was primarily due to geographic changes in profits, in particular lower income in the United States due to charges and amortization associated with the Fisher merger, together with the impact of an enhanced tax credit for qualifying U.S. research costs, growth in lower tax regions such as Asia and, to a lesser extent, a tax gain in excess of the related book gain on the sale of a product line in 2006.
Discontinued Operations
Subsequent to the 2006 acquisition of GVI, the UK Office of Fair Trading (OFT) commenced an investigation of the transaction to determine whether it qualified for consideration under the UK Enterprise Act. On December 15, 2006, the OFT referred the transaction to the UK Competition Commission for further investigation under the Enterprise Act to determine whether the transaction had resulted in, or may be expected to result in, a substantial lessening of
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Nine Months 2007 Compared With First Nine Months 2006 (continued)
competition within any market in the UK for goods or services, particularly gas isotope ratio mass spectrometers (Gas IRMS), thermal ionization mass spectrometers (TIMS) and multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometers. The Competition Commission published its final report on May 30, 2007, concluding that the company’s acquisition of GVI would lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the UK in the markets for Gas IRMS and TIMS products. The Competition Commission has also concluded that a divestiture remedy is therefore appropriate and has determined that the company be required to divest of either GVI as a whole, or its Gas IRMS and TIMS assets, to a purchaser approved by the Competition Commission. As a result of the requirement to divest of GVI, the company has recorded a non-cash after-tax impairment charge of $27 million. The loss primarily represents the carrying value of the business in excess of estimated disposal value. Due to the immateriality of the operating results of this business relative to consolidated results, the company has not reclassified the historical results and accounts of this business to discontinued operations.
During the second quarter of 2007, the company received additional proceeds relating to the sale of a business divested in 2000 and recorded an after-tax gain of $3 million.
The company had after-tax gains of $2 million in 2006 from the disposal of discontinued operations. The gains represent additional proceeds from the sale of several businesses prior to 2004, net of a charge for the settlement of an indemnification claim that arose from a divested business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Consolidated working capital was $2.28$2.08 billion at SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, compared with $1.51$1.76 billion at December 31, 2006.2007. The increase was primarily due to a reductionincreases in short-term borrowingsaccounts receivable, cash and, to a lesser extent, an increase in cash.inventories. Included in working capital were cash, cash equivalents and short-term available-for-sale investments of $846$748 million at SeptemberMarch 29, 20072008 and $691$639 million at December 31, 2006.2007.
First Nine Months 2007Quarter 2008
Cash provided by operating activities was $948$243 million during the first nine monthsquarter of 2007.2008. An increase in accounts receivable used cash of $96 million due to strong shipments in the last month of the first quarter of 2008. A reduction in other current liabilities used cash of $122$68 million, primarily as a result of $52 million of merger-related payments as well as payment of annual incentive compensation. Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds, totaled $92 million in the first nine months of 2007. The company does not expect to make significant U.S. estimated tax payments in 2007, primarily due to tax deductions for merger-related equity-based compensation and net operating loss carryforwards. Cash of $65$45 million was used to replenish inventory levels following strong fourth quarter shipments. Payments for restructuring actions of the company’s continuing operations, principally severance, lease costs and other expenses of real estate consolidation, used cash of $29 million during the first nine months of 2007.
In connection with restructuring actions undertaken by continuing operations, the company had accrued $14 million for restructuring costs at September 29, 2007. The company expects to pay approximately $9 million of this amount for severance, retention and other costs, primarily through 2007. The balance of $5 million will be paid for lease obligations over the remaining terms of the leases, with approximately 16% to be paid through 2007 and the remainder through 2011. In addition, at September 29, 2007, the company had accrued $20 million for acquisition expenses. Accrued acquisition expenses included $12 million of severance and relocation obligations, which the company expects to pay primarily during 2007 and 2008. The remaining balance primarily represents abandoned-facility payments that will be paid over the remaining terms of the leases through 2011.
During the first nine monthsquarter of 2007,2008, the primary investing activities of the company’s continuing operations excluding available-for-sale investment activities, were acquisitions andincluded the purchase of property, plant and equipment. The company expended $94 million on acquisitions and $118$54 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment.The company collected a note receivable from Newport Corporation totaling $48 million and had proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment of $15 million, principally real estate. The company’s discontinued operations provided cash of $31 million from investing activities, principally the sale of Genevac, Ltd.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Nine Months 2007 (continued)
The company’s financing activities used $636$68 million of cash during the first nine monthsquarter of 2007,2008, principally for the repayment of $458 million of short-term debt and the repurchase of $540$102 million of the company’s common stock, offset in part by proceeds of stock option exercises. The company had proceeds of $309$29 million from the exercise of employee stock options and $64$7 million of tax benefits from the exercise of stock options. In February 2007, theAs of March 29, 2008, no remaining Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $300 million of the company’s common stock through February 28, 2008. On August 9, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of an additional $700 million of the company’s common stock through August 8, 2008. At September 29, 2007, $460 million was availableDirectors’ authorization exists for future repurchases of the company’s common stock under the August 8, 2008 Board authorization.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, through November 1, 2007, the company acquired businesses for aggregate cash consideration of approximately $375 million (Note 17). In addition, the company has entered agreement to acquire a business for $41 million, subject to regulatory approvals.repurchases.
The company has no material commitments for purchases of property, plant and equipment and expects that for all of 2007,2008, such expenditures will approximate $175$230 - $200$250 million. The company’s contractual obligations and other commercial commitments did not change materially between December 31, 20062007 and SeptemberMarch 29, 2007.2008.
The company believes that its existing resources, including cash and investments, future cash flow from operations and available borrowings under its existing revolving credit facilities, are sufficient to meet the working capital requirements of its existing businesses for the foreseeable future, including at least the next 24 months.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
First Nine Months 2006Quarter 2007
Cash provided by operating activities was $200$219 million during the first nine monthsquarter of 2006. The company2007. A reduction in current liabilities used cash of $31$75 million, to increase inventory levels. Cashprimarily as a result of $43 million was provided by collections on accounts receivable. A reduction in other current liabilities used $38 million of cash in the first nine months of 2006, primarily for payment of annual incentive compensation and income taxas well as $23 million of merger-related payments. Cash of $47 million was used to replenish inventory levels following strong fourth quarter shipments. Payments for restructuring actions of the company’s continuing operations, principally severance, lease costs and other expenses of real estate consolidation, used cash of $21$13 million induring the first nine monthsquarter of 2006.2007.
During the first nine monthsquarter of 2006,2007, the primary investing activities of the company’s continuing operations, excluding available-for-sale investment activities, included acquisitions, the purchase and sale of property, plant and equipment and the sale of a product line.lines. The company expended $59$34 million on acquisitions and $32$40 million for purchases of property, plant and equipment. The company had proceedscollected a note receivable from the sale of a product line of $9Newport Corporation totaling $48 million. Investing activities of the company’s discontinued operations provided $5 million of cash in the first nine months of 2006, primarily additional proceeds from a business divested prior to 2004.
The company’s financing activities used $262$194 million of cash during the first nine monthsquarter of 2006,2007, principally for the repurchaserepayment of $228$309 million of the company’s common stock,short-term debt, offset in part by proceeds of $26stock option exercises. The company had proceeds of $113 million from the exercise of employee stock options and $7$10 million of tax benefits from the exercise of stock options.
Item 3 —3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The company’s exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates and equity prices has not changed materially from its exposure at year-end 2006.2007.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Item 4 —4. Controls and Procedures
The company’s management, with the participation of the company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007.2008. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, the company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of such date, the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) during the fiscal quarter ended SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A —1A. Risk Factors
Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements beginning on page 23.18.
We must develop new products, adapt to rapid and significant technological change and respond to introductions of new products in order to remain competitive. Our growth strategy includes significant investment in and expenditures for product development. We sell our products in several industries that are characterized by rapid and significant technological changes, frequent new product and service introductions and enhancements and evolving industry standards. Without the timely introduction of new products, services and enhancements, our products and services will likely become technologically obsolete over time, in which case our revenue and operating results would suffer.
Development of our products requires significant investment; our products and technologies could become uncompetitive or obsolete. Our customers use many of our products to develop, test and manufacture their own products. As a result, we must anticipate industry trends and develop products in advance of the commercialization of our customers’ products. If we fail to adequately predict our customers’ needs and future activities, we may invest heavily in research and development of products and services that do not lead to significant revenue.
Many of our existing products and those under development are technologically innovative and require significant planning, design, development and testing at the technological, product and manufacturing-process levels. These activities require us to make significant investments.
Products in our markets undergo rapid and significant technological change because of quickly changing industry standards and the introduction of new products and technologies that make existing products and technologies uncompetitive or obsolete. Our competitors may adapt more quickly to new technologies
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
and changes in customers’ customers’ requirements than we can. The products that we are currently developing, or those we will develop in the future, may not be technologically feasible or accepted by the marketplace, and our products or technologies could become uncompetitive or obsolete.
It may be difficult for us to implement our strategies for improving internal growth. Some of the markets in which we compete have been flat or declining over the past several years. To address this issue, we are pursuing a number of strategies to improve our internal growth, including:
finding new markets for our products;
developing new applications for our technologies;
combining sales and marketing operations in appropriate markets to compete more effectively;
allocating research and development funding to products with higher growth prospects;
continuing key customer initiatives;
expanding our service offerings;
strengthening our presence in selected geographic markets; and
continuing the development of commercial tools and infrastructure to increase and support cross-selling opportunities of products and services to take advantage of our breadth in product offerings.
We may not be able to successfully implement these strategies, and these strategies may not result in the growth of our business.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
The company may be unable to integrate successfully the legacy businesses of Thermo Electron Corporation and Fisher Scientific International Inc. and may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger.
The merger involved the combination of two companies which previously operated as independent public companies. The company is required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating its business practices and operations. Potential difficulties the company may encounter in the integration process include the following:
if we are unable to successfully combine the businesses of Thermo and Fisher in a manner that permits the company to achieve the cost savings and operating synergies anticipated to result from the merger, such anticipated benefits of the merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected;
lost sales and customers as a result of certain customers of either of the two former companies deciding not to do business with the company;
complexities associated with managing the combined businesses;
integrating personnel from diverse corporate cultures while maintaining focus on providing consistent, high quality products and customer service;
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the merger; and
inability to successfully execute a branding campaign for the combined company.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
In addition, it is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption or interruption of, or the loss of momentum in, the company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger, or could reduce our earnings or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of the company.
Our inability to protect our intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, third parties may claim that we infringe their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation or licensing expense as a result. We place considerable emphasis on obtaining patent and trade secret protection for significant new technologies, products and processes because of the length of time and expense associated with bringing new products through the development process and into the marketplace. Our success depends in part on our ability to develop patentable products and obtain and enforce patent protection for our products both in the United States and in other countries. We own numerous U.S. and foreign patents, and we intend to file additional applications, as appropriate, for patents covering our products. Patents may not be issued for any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and the claims allowed under any issued patents may not be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Any issued patents owned by or licensed to us may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and the rights under these patents may not provide us with competitive advantages. In addition, competitors may design around our technology or develop competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could make it easier for competitors to capture increased market position. We could incur substantial costs to defend ourselves in suits brought against us or in suits in which we may assert our patent rights against others. An unfavorable outcome of any such litigation could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
We also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how with which we seek to protect our products, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, employees and consultants. These agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors.
Third parties may assert claims against us to the effect that we are infringing on their intellectual property rights. For example, in September 2004 Applied Biosystems/MDS Scientific Instruments and related parties brought a lawsuit against us alleging our mass spectrometer systems infringe a patent held by the plaintiffs. We could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources in defending these claims, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, parties making these claims could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to make, use, sell, distribute, or market our products and services in the United States or abroad. In the event that a claim relating to intellectual property is asserted against us, or third parties not affiliated with us hold pending or issued patents that relate to our products or technology, we may seek licenses to such intellectual property or challenge those patents. However, we may be unable to obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and our challenge of the patents may be unsuccessful. Our failure to obtain the necessary licenses or other rights could prevent the sale, manufacture, or distribution of our products and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Demand for most of our products depends on capital spending policies of our customers and on government funding policies. Our customers include pharmaceutical and chemical companies, laboratories, universities, healthcare providers, government agencies and public and private research institutions. Many factors, including public policy spending priorities, available resources and product and economic cycles, have a significant effect on the capital spending policies of these entities. These policies in turn can have a significant effect on the demand for our products.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
Our results could be impacted if we are unable to realize potential future benefits from new productivity initiatives. We continue to pursue practical process improvement (PPI) programs and other cost saving initiatives at our locations which are designed to further enhance our productivity, efficiency and customer satisfaction. While we anticipate continued benefits from these initiatives, future benefits are expected to be fewer and smaller in size and may be more difficult to achieve.
Our business is impacted by general economic conditions and related uncertainties affecting markets in which we operate. Adverse economic conditions could adversely impact our business during 2007in 2008 and beyond, resulting in:
reduced demand for some of our products;
increased rate of order cancellations or delays;
increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories;
increased pressure on the prices for our products and services; and
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable.
Changes in governmental regulations may reduce demand for our products or increase our expenses. We compete in many markets in which we and our customers must comply with federal, state, local and international regulations, such as environmental, health and safety and food and drug regulations. We develop, configure and market our products to meet customer needs created by those regulations. Any significant change in regulations could reduce demand for our products or increase our expenses. For example, many of our instruments are marketed to the
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
pharmaceutical industry for use in discovering and developing drugs. Changes in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of the drug discovery and development process could have an adverse effect on the demand for these products.
If any of our security products fail to detect explosives or radiation, we could be exposed to product liability and related claims for which we may not have adequate insurance coverage. The products sold by our environmental instruments business include a comprehensive range of fixed and portable instruments used for chemical, radiation and trace explosives detection. These products are used in airports, embassies, cargo facilities, border crossings and other high-threat facilities for the detection and prevention of terrorist acts. If any of these products were to malfunction, it is possible that explosive or radioactive material could pass through the product undetected, which could lead to product liability claims. There are also many other factors beyond our control that could lead to liability claims, such as the reliability and competence of the customers’ operators and the training of such operators. Any such product liability claims brought against us could be significant and any adverse determination may result in liabilities in excess of our insurance coverage. Although we carry product liability insurance, we cannot be certain that our current insurance will be sufficient to cover these claims or that it can be maintained on acceptable terms, if at all.
Our inability to successfully identify and complete acquisitions or successfully integrate any new or previous acquisitions could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our business strategy includes the acquisition of technologies and businesses that complement or augment our existing products and services. Promising acquisitions are difficult to identify and complete for a number of reasons, including competition among prospective buyers and the need for regulatory, including antitrust, approvals. We may not be able to identify and successfully complete transactions. Any acquisition we may complete may be made at a substantial premium over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired company. Further, we may not be able to integrate any acquired businesses successfully into our existing businesses, make such businesses profitable, or realize anticipated cost savings or synergies, if any, from these acquisitions, which could adversely affect our business.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
Moreover, we have acquired many companies and businesses. As a result of these acquisitions, we recorded significant goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on our balance sheet, which amountsamount to approximately $8.55$8.72 and $1.33 billion, respectively, as of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007.2008. We assess the realizability of the goodwill we have on our booksand indefinite-lived intangible assets annually as well as whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the goodwillthese assets may be impaired. These events or circumstances generally include operating losses or a significant decline in earnings associated with the acquired business or asset. Our ability to realize the value of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets will depend on the future cash flows of these businesses. These cash flows in turn depend in part on how well we have integrated these businesses. If we are not able to realize the value of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we may be required to incur material charges relating to the impairment of those assets.
Our growth strategy to acquire new businesses may not be successful and the integration of future acquisitions may be difficult and disruptive to our ongoing operations.
We have retained contingent liabilities from businesses that we have sold. From 1997 through 2004, we divested over 60 businesses with aggregate annual revenues in excess of $2 billion. As part of these transactions, we retained responsibility for some of the contingent liabilities related to these businesses, such as lawsuits, product liability and environmental claims and potential claims by buyers that representations and warranties we made about the businesses were inaccurate. The resolution of these contingencies has not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition; however, we can not be certain that this favorable pattern will continue.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
As a multinational corporation, we are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could adversely affect our cash flows and results of operations. International revenues account for a substantial portion of our revenues, and we intend to continue expanding our presence in international markets. In 2006,2007, our international revenues from continuing operations, including export revenues from the United States, accounted for approximately 46%35% of our total revenues. The exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates takes on different forms. International revenues are subject to the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates could adversely affect product demand and the profitability in U.S. dollars of products and services provided by us in international markets, where payment for our products and services is made in the local currency. As a multinational corporation, our businesses occasionally invoice third-party customers in currencies other than the one in which they primarily do business (the “functional currency”). Movements in the invoiced currency relative to the functional currency could adversely impact our cash flows and our results of operations. In addition, reported sales made in non-U.S. currencies by our international businesses, when translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes, fluctuate due to exchange rate movement. Should our international sales grow, exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a larger effect on our financial results. In 2006,2007, currency translation had a favorable effect on revenues of our continuing operations of $18$241 million due to a weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies in which the company sells products and services.
We are subject to laws and regulations governing government contracts, and failure to address these laws and regulations or comply with government contracts could harm our business by leading to a reduction in revenue associated with these customers. We have agreements relating to the sale of our products to government entities and, as a result, we are subject to various statutes and regulations that apply to companies doing business with the government. The laws governing government contracts differ from the laws governing private contracts and government contracts may contain pricing terms and conditions that are not applicable to private contracts. We are also subject to investigation for compliance with the regulations governing government contracts. A failure to comply with these regulations could result in suspension of these contracts, criminal, civil and administrative penalties or debarment.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
Because we compete directly with certain of our largest customers and product suppliers, our results of operations could be adversely affected in the short term if these customers or suppliers abruptly discontinue or significantly modify their relationship with us.
Our largest customerin the laboratory consumables business and our largest customer in the diagnostics business are also significant competitors. Our business may be harmed in the short term if our competitive relationship in the marketplace with these customers results in a discontinuation of their purchases from us. In addition, we manufacture products that compete directly with products that we source from third-party suppliers. We also source competitive products from multiple suppliers. Our business could be adversely affected in the short term if any of our large third-party suppliers abruptly discontinues selling products to us.
Because we rely heavily on third-party package-delivery services, a significant disruption in these services or significant increases in prices may disrupt our ability to ship products, increase our costs and lower our profitability.
We ship a significant portion of our products to our customers through independent package delivery companies, such as UPS and Federal Express in the U.S. and DHL in Europe. We also maintain a small fleet of vehicles dedicated to the delivery of our products and ship our products through other carriers, including national and regional trucking firms, overnight carrier services and the U.S. Postal Service. If UPS or another third-party package-delivery provider experiences a major work stoppage, preventing our products from being delivered in a timely fashion or causing us to incur additional shipping costs we could not pass on to our customers, our costs could increase and our relationships with certain of our customers could be adversely affected. In addition, if UPS or our other third-party package-delivery providers increase prices, and we are not able to find comparable alternatives or make adjustments in our delivery network, our profitability could be adversely affected.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
We are subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign agencies that require us to comply with a wide variety of regulations, including those regarding the manufacture of products, the shipping of our products and environmental matters.
Some of our operations are subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and similar international agencies. These regulations govern a wide variety of product activities, from design and development to labeling, manufacturing, promotion, sales and distribution. If we fail to comply with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s regulations or those of similar international agencies, we may have to recall products and cease their manufacture and distribution, which would increase our costs and reduce our revenues.
We are subject to federal, state, local and international laws and regulations that govern the handling, transportation, manufacture, use or sale of substances that are or could be classified as toxic or hazardous substances. Some risk of environmental damage is inherent in our operations and the products we manufacture, sell or distribute. This requires us to devote significant resources to maintain compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, including the establishment of reserves to address potential environmental costs, and manage environmental risks.
We rely heavily on manufacturing operations to produce the products we sell, and our business could be adversely affected by disruptions of our manufacturing operations.
We rely upon our manufacturing operations to produce many of the products we sell. Any significant disruption of those operations for any reason, such as strikes or other labor unrest, power interruptions, fire, earthquakes, or other events beyond our control could adversely affect our sales and customer relationships and therefore adversely affect our business. Although most of our raw materials are available from a number of potential suppliers, our operations also depend upon our ability to obtain raw materials at reasonable prices. If we are unable to obtain the materials we need at a reasonable price, we may not be able to produce certain of our products or we may not be able to produce certain of these products at a marketable price, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
We may be unable to adjust to rapid changes in the healthcare industry, some of which could adversely affect our business.
The healthcare industry has undergone significant changes in an effort to reduce costs. These changes include:
development of large and sophisticated groups purchasing medical and surgical supplies;
wider implementation of managed care;
legislative healthcare reform;
consolidation of pharmaceutical companies;
increased outsourcing of certain activities, including to low-cost offshore locations; and
consolidation of distributors of pharmaceutical, medical and surgical supplies.
We expect the healthcare industry to continue to change significantly in the future. Some of these potential changes, such as a reduction in governmental support of healthcare services or adverse changes in legislation or regulations governing the delivery or pricing of healthcare services or mandated benefits, may cause healthcare-industry participants to purchase fewer of our products and services or to reduce the prices they are willing to pay for our products or services.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
We may incur unexpected costs from increases in fuel and raw material prices, which could reduce our earnings and cash flow.
Our primary commodity exposures are for fuel, petroleum-based resins, steel and serum. While we may seek to minimize the impact of price increases through higher prices to customers and various cost-saving measures, our earnings and cash flows could be adversely affected in the event these measures are insufficient to cover our costs.
Unforeseen problems with the implementation and maintenance of our information systems at certain of our sites could interfere with our operations. As a part of the effort to upgrade our current information systems, we are implementing new enterprise resource planning software and other software applications to manage certain of our business operations. As we implement and add functionality, problems could arise that we have not foreseen. Such problems could adversely impact our ability to do the following in a timely manner: provide quotes, take customer orders, ship products, provide services and support to our customers, bill and track our customers, fulfill contractual obligations and otherwise run our business. In addition, if our new systems fail to provide accurate and increased visibility into pricing and cost structures, it may be difficult to improve or maximize our profit margins. As a result, our results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
Our debt may adversely affect our cash flow and may restrict our investment opportunities or limit our activities.
As of SeptemberMarch 29, 2007,2008, we had approximately $2.20 billion in outstanding indebtedness. In addition, we had the ability to incur an additional $956$955 million of indebtedness under our revolving credit facility. We may also obtain additional long-term debt and lines of credit to meet future financing needs, which would have the effect of increasing our total leverage.
Our leverage could have negative consequences, including increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, limiting our ability to obtain additional financing and limiting our ability to acquire new products and technologies through strategic acquisitions.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Risk Factors (continued)
Our ability to satisfy our obligations depends on our future operating performance and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow to meet these obligations. If we are unable to service our debt or obtain additional financing, we may be forced to delay strategic acquisitions, capital expenditures or research and development expenditures. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Additionally, the agreements governing our debt require that we maintain certain financial ratios, and contain affirmative and negative covenants that restrict our activities by, among other limitations, limiting our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, create liens, sell assets and enter into transactions with affiliates. The covenants in our revolving credit facility include a debt-to-EBITDA ratio. Specifically, the company has agreed that, so long as any lender has any commitment under the facility, or any loan or other obligation is outstanding under the facility, or any letter of credit is outstanding under the new facility, it will not permit (as the following terms are defined in the new facility) the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (the ratio of consolidated indebtednessIndebtedness to consolidatedConsolidated EBITDA) as at the last day of any fiscal quarter to be greater than 3.0 to 1.0.
Our ability to comply with these financial restrictions and covenants is dependent on our future performance, which is subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors, including factors that are beyond our control such as foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Our failure to comply with any of these restrictions or covenants may result in an event of default under the applicable debt instrument, which could permit acceleration of the debt under that instrument and require us to prepay that debt before its scheduled due date. Also, an acceleration of the debt under one of our debt instrumentswould trigger an event of default under other of our debt instruments.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Item 2 —2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
A summary of the share repurchase activity for the company’s thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 follows:
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | Maximum Dollar Amount of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (In millions) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 1 - August 4 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | 1,000.0 | |
August 5 - September 1 | | | 6,374,200 | | | 52.78 | | | 6,374,200 | | | 663.6 | |
September 2 - September 29 | | | 3,706,053 | | | 54.99 | | | 3,706,053 | | | 459.8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Third Quarter | | | 10,080,253 | | $ | 53.59 | | | 10,080,253 | | $ | 459.8 | |
Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | Maximum Dollar Amount of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) (in millions) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
January 1 – February 2 | | | — | | $ | — | | | — | | $ | 102.0 | |
February 3 – March 1 | | | 1,770,319 | | | 56.49 | | | 1,770,319 | | | 2.0 | |
March 2 – March 29 | | | 36,331 | | | 53.70 | | | 36,331 | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total First Quarter | | | 1,806,650 | | $ | 56.43 | | | 1,806,650 | | $ | — | |
(1) | In February 2007, the company announced a repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $300 million of the company’s common stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions. On August 9, 2007, the company increased the existing authorization for the purchase of up to an additional $700 million of the company’s common stock in the open market or in negotiated transactions, which expires August 8, 2008. All of the shares of common stock repurchased by the company during the thirdfirst quarter of 20072008 were purchased under this program. As of March 29, 2008, no remaining authorization exists for future repurchases. |
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
Item 5 — Other Information
On October 31, 2007, the company made a decision to discontinue all operations at a manufacturing plant in Chateau-Gontier, France in a phased plan through mid-2009. The facility is part of the Laboratory Products and Services segment and currently manufactures laboratory equipment, primarily centrifuges, incubators and biological safety cabinets. The manufacture of these products will be transferred to existing company facilities in Germany and China.
As a result of the plant closing, approximately 115 employees will be severed. Restructuring and related charges associated with the plant closing are expected to be approximately $16-18 million, including cash costs of $15-17 million, primarily severance, retention and abandoned facility costs, and $1 million of asset write-offs. The costs will be recorded between the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2009.
Item 6 —6. Exhibits
See Exhibit Index on page 44.34.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized as of the 1st2nd day of November 2007.May 2008.
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC. |
| |
| |
| |
| /s/ Peter M. Wilver |
| Peter M. Wilver |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| |
| |
| |
| /s/ Peter E. Hornstra |
| Peter E. Hornstra |
| Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | | Description of Exhibit |
10.1 | | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan,Letter Agreement with Alex Stachtiaris dated October 22, 2007 for amounts deferred after December 31, 2004.March 10, 2008. |
| | |
10.2 | | Letter Agreement dated March 5, 2008 between the Registrant and Marijn Dekkers (filed as exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 10, 2008 [File No. 1-8002] and incorporated in this document by reference). |
| | |
10.3 | | Form of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Deferred Compensation’s March 2008 Performance Restricted Stock Agreement for use in connection with the grant of performance restricted stock under the Registrant’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, for Directors, as amended and restated on September 12, 2007.November 9, 2006 to officers of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 10, 2008 [File No. 1-8002] and incorporated in this document by reference). |
| | |
10.4 | | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Marijn Dekkers dated April 7, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2008 [File No. 1-8002] and incorporated in this document by reference). |
| | |
10.5 | | Letter Agreement dated April 7, 2008, between the Registrant and Marijn Dekkers (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2008 [File No. 1-8002] and incorporated in this document by reference). |
| | |
10.6 | | Letter Agreement dated April 7, 2008, between the Registrant and Marijn Dekkers (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 10, 2008 [File No. 1-8002] and incorporated in this document by reference). |
| | |
31.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
| | |
32.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) and 15d-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
_________________
* | Certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |