ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, ~~INC~~.INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016

____TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from _____________ to ____________

Commission file number 0-9347

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7950 E. Acoma Drive, Suite 111, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(~~Registrant’s~~Registrant's telephone number)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements in the past 90 days. X Yes ___ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). X Yes ___ No

As of November ~~10, 2015~~7, 2016 there were 4,982,400 shares of common stock outstanding.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Except for historical information, the statements contained herein are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. The words ~~“believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” ”should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is~~"believe," "may," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "should," "plan," "could," "target," "potential," "is likely,~~” “will,” “expect”~~" "will," "expect" and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the ~~“safe harbor”~~"safe harbor" provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such forward-looking statements are based on the expectations of management when made and are subject to, and are qualified by, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors, among others, that could affect the outcome of the Company's forward-looking statements: general economic and market conditions; the inability to profitably run current operations sufficient to cover overhead; the inability to attract, hire and retain key personnel; the difficulty of integrating an acquired business; unforeseen litigation; unfavorable result of potential litigation; the ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in order to support operations; the ability to maintain satisfactory relationships with current and future suppliers; federal and/or state regulatory and legislative action; the ability to implement or adjust to new technologies and the ability to secure and maintain key contracts and relationships. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible to accurately predict all such risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any risk factor, or combination of risk factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report or in the documents we incorporate by reference, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC~~.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 (unaudited)

COMMON STOCK ACCUMULATED
SHARES AMOUNT DEFICIT TOTAL
Balances, June 30, 2015      4,982,400 $   109,159,300 $ (105,253,500) $      3,905,800
Value of stock-based compensation                              -                    13,900                                   -                      13,900
Net loss                              -                             -                     (403,300)                (403,300)
Balances, September 30, 2015      4,982,400 $   109,173,200 $ (105,656,800) $       3,516,400

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (unaudited)

		2016				2015

NET REVENUES	$		3,800		$		114,300
Cost of revenues			90,400				260,400
GROSS LOSS			(86,600	)			(146,100	)

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Corporate expenses			73,600				93,700
Alanco Energy Services			139,500				157,000
Stock-based compensation			-				13,900
			213,100				264,600

OPERATING LOSS			(299,700	)			(410,700	)

OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE)
Interest income			7,100				7,400
Interest expense			(11,000	)			-
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS			(303,600	)			(403,300	)

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Loss from discontinued operations			(176,000	)			-
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS			(176,000	)			-

NET LOSS	$		(479,600	)	$		(403,300	)

LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
Continuing operations	$		(0.06	)	$		(0.08	)
Discontinued operations	$		(0.04	)	$		-
Net loss per share	$		(0.10	)	$		(0.08	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED			4,982,400				4,982,400

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (unaudited)

2015 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss $ (403,300) $ (178,200)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 46,100 45,100
Accretion of fair value - contingent payments 4,700 8,400
Gain on sale of marketable securities                         - (46,700)
Stock-based compensation for options                13,900                       -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (8,800) 9,500
Other receivables - related party (2,400) 5,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 131,300 22,600
Trust account - asset retirement obligation (4,700) (4,700)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (57,100) 128,800
Contingent land payment                         - (16,400)
Net cash used in operating activities           (280,300)           (26,600)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from repayment of American Citizenship Center, LLC note receivable                17,200             50,000
Purchase of land, property, and equipment                   (600)         (163,300)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities                         -           279,100
Net cash provided by investing activities                16,600           165,800

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in financing activities                         -                       -

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS           (263,700)           139,200

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
            788,900         1,215,600

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
$             525,200 $        1,354,800

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Non-cash investing & financing activities:
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities $                         - $           (97,700)
Note receivable issued for ACC amendment fee $                         - $            (10,000)
Value of stock-based compensation for options $                13,900 $                       -

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 (unaudited)



	COMMON STOCK						ACCUMULATED
	SHARES			AMOUNT			DEFICIT				TOTAL
Balances, June 30, 2016		4,982,400	$		109,188,200	$		(106,848,300	)	$		2,339,900
Value of warrants		-			1,800			-				1,800
Net loss		-			-			(479,600	)			(479,600	)
Balances, September 30, 2016		4,982,400	$		109,190,000	$		(107,327,900	)	$		1,862,100

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, (unaudited)

		2016				2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$		(479,600	)	$		(403,300	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			45,900				46,100
Accretion of fair value - contingent payments			4,700				4,700
Stock-based compensation for options			-				13,900
Exercisable warrants issued under note payable to Anderson Family Trust			1,800				-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - trade			3,700				(8,800	)
Other receivables - related party			500				(2,400	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(15,900	)			131,300
Trust account - asset retirement obligation			(4,700	)			(4,700	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			113,400				(57,100	)
Net cash used in operating activities			(330,200	)			(280,300	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from repayment of American Citizenship Center, LLC note receivable			-				17,200
Purchase of land, property, and equipment			-				(600	)
Net cash provided by investing activities			-				16,600

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from note payable to Anderson Family Trust			200,000				-
Net cash provided by financing activities			200,000				-

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS			(130,200	)			(263,700	)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period			139,600				788,900

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period	$		9,400		$		525,200

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Non-cash investing & financing activities:
Value of exercisable warrants issued under note payable to Anderson Family Trust	$		1,800		$		-
Value of stock-based compensation for options	$		-		$		13,900

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note A – Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Nature of Operations

Alanco Technologies, Inc. ~~(Stock Symbol:~~(OTCQB: ALAN) was incorporated in 1969 under the laws of the State of Arizona. Unless otherwise noted, the ~~“Company”~~"Company" or ~~“Alanco”~~"Alanco" refers to Alanco Technologies, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. ~~During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company formed~~The Company's subsidiary, Alanco Energy Services, Inc. ~~(“AES”~~("AES"), ~~for the purpose of obtaining property to establish~~operates a water disposal facility near Grand Junction, CO to receive and dispose of produced water generated as a byproduct from oil and natural gas production in Western Colorado. During the fiscal year 2016, the Company implemented a plan to divest of its 160 acre owned and undeveloped land and associated permits located near its water disposal facility and known as Indian Mesa. Refer to Note D - Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations for further discussion.

During the current quarter, the Company formed Alanco Behavioral Health, Inc. ("ABH"), a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the State of Arizona. The ~~new facility started~~venture will be led by David C. Johnson, President. The Company launched ABH to ~~receive produced water~~pursue its business plan to consolidate small cap private behavioral health companies through acquisition. The Company's objective is to create a market leader in ~~August 2012.~~behavioral health treatment services helping people and their families while adding value to the Company's shareholders through strong revenue growth and cash flow. On September 23, 2016 the Company executed a Letter of Intent to purchase the operations of Bella Monte Recovery, LLC, its first planned acquisition in the behavioral health market. The Company is in the process of performing due diligence with a target closing date of December 1, 2016.

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~~(“GAAP”~~("GAAP") for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements. Such necessary adjustments consist of normal recurring items and the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2016 was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the ~~Company’s~~Company's June 30, ~~2015~~2016 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain prior year numbers have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Sales tax on certain revenues for the fiscal year 2015 that were classified as cost of revenues has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to offset revenues to conform to the current year’s presentation. In addition, the value of stock-based compensation for the fiscal year 2015 which was included in corporate expenses has been reclassified in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations to a separate line item. These reclassifications had no effect on net loss or net loss per share.

Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities – The estimated fair values for assets and liabilities are determined at discrete points in time based on relevant information. The Accounting Standards Codification ~~(“ASC”~~("ASC") prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The ~~Company’s~~Company's policy is to recognize transfers into and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 categories as of the date of the event or change in circumstances occurs. The carrying amounts of receivables, prepaid expenses, trust account, accounts payable, ~~and~~ accrued liabilities and note payable approximate fair value given their short-term nature or their effective interest rates, which represent Level 3 input levels.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

The following are the classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~June 30, 2016, using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

Fair Value at September 30, 2016

		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices			Level 2:
		in active			Significant			Level 3:			Total
		Markets			Other			Significant			at
		for Identical			Observable			Unobservable			September 30,
		Assets			Inputs			Inputs			2016
Asset Retirement Obligation	$		-	$		-	$		434,000	$		434,000
Contigent Land Payment			-			-			677,400			677,400
	$		-	$		-	$		1,111,400	$		1,111,400

Fair Value at September 30, 2015

Level 1:
Quoted Prices Level 2:
in active Significant Level 3: Total
Markets Other Significant at
for Identical Observable Unobservable September 30,
Assets Inputs Inputs 2015
Asset Retirement Obligation $                          - $                      - $           429,700 $       429,700
Contigent Land Payment                          -                      -           658,600       658,600
$                          - $                      - $       1,088,300 $    1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015

Level 1:
Quoted Prices Level 2:
in active Significant Level 3: Total
Markets Other Significant at
for Identical Observable Unobservable June 30,
Assets Inputs Inputs 2015
Asset Retirement Obligation $                          - $                      - $           429,700 $       429,700
Contigent Land Payment                          -                      -           653,900       653,900
$                          - $                      - $       1,083,600 $    1,083,600

Fair Value at June 30, 2016

		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices			Level 2:
		in active			Significant			Level 3:			Total
		Markets			Other			Significant			at
		for Identical			Observable			Unobservable			September 30,
		Assets			Inputs			Inputs			2016
Asset Retirement Obligation	$		-	$		-	$		434,000	$		434,000
Contigent Land Payment			-			-			672,700			672,700
	$		-	$		-	$		1,106,700	$		1,106,700

The following is a reconciliation of the opening and closing balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

			Asset		Contingent				Asset			Contingent
			Retirement		Land				Retirement			Land
			Obligation		Payment		Total		Obligation			Payment			Total
Opening balance	Opening balance	$	429,700	$	653,900	$	1,083,600	$		434,000	$		672,700	$		1,106,700
	Accretion expense		-		4,700		4,700
Accretion expense										-			4,700			4,700
Closing balance	Closing balance	$	429,700	$	658,600	$	1,088,300	$		434,000	$		677,400	$		1,111,400

Fair Value of Asset Retirement Obligation – The Deer Creek asset retirement obligation is the estimated cost to close the Deer Creek facility under terms of the lease, meeting environmental and State of Colorado regulatory requirements. The estimate is determined at discrete points in time based upon significant unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. ~~Management’s~~Management's estimate of the asset retirement obligation is based upon a cost estimate developed by a consultant knowledgeable of government closure requirements and costs incurred at similar water disposal facility operations. The process used was to identify each activity in the closure process, obtaining vendor estimated costs, in current dollars, to perform the closure activity and accumulating the various vendor estimates to determine the asset retirement obligation. A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated asset retirement obligation results in the fair value of the asset retirement obligation to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 410-20: Asset Retirement Obligations requires the Company to review the asset retirement obligation on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Fair Value of Contingent Payments – The contingent land payment ~~and contingent purchase price liabilities are~~liability is also determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. In calculating the estimate of fair value for ~~both of~~ the contingent ~~payments,~~land payment, management completed an estimate of the present value of ~~each identified~~the contingent liability based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek facility developed under plans currently approved by the ~~Company’s~~Company's board of directors. Different assumptions relative to the expansion or alternative uses of the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities could result in significantly different valuations. The projected payments have been discounted at a rate of 3% per annum to determine net present value. The lack of an active market to validate the estimated contingent land liability results in the fair value of the contingent land liability to be a Level 3 fair value measurement. ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement requires the Company to review the contingent land liability on a recurring basis and record changes in the period incurred. ~~Pursuant~~

Assets Held for Sale – The Company has implemented a plan to ~~ASC Topic 820, during~~divest of its 160 acre owned and undeveloped land and associated permits located in Whitewater, Colorado and known as Indian Mesa. As a result, the ~~fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 the Company reversed the contingent purchase price liability it had previously recorded based on the parameters~~value of the ~~contingency~~land and associated permits has been classified as Assets Held for Sale at September 30, 2016. A long-lived asset classified as held for sale shall be measured at the ~~estimated present~~lower of its carrying amount or fair value ~~based upon projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures~~less cost to sell. The value of Assets Held for Sale represents the ~~Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities developed under plans currently approved by the Company’s board of directors.~~carrying amount.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance regarding revenue from contracts with customers. The guidance outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes the most current revenue recognition guidance. In August 2015, this accounting pronouncement was deferred for one year, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In ~~September 2015,~~January 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding the ~~simplification~~enhancement of ~~accounting for~~reporting financial instruments including aspects of recognition, measurement, ~~period adjustments for business combinations.~~presentation and disclosure. The guidance is effective for ~~annual reporting~~ periods beginning after December 15, ~~2015,~~2017 including interim ~~reporting~~ periods within ~~that reporting period~~those fiscal years. While a portion of the guidance allows for early application, it does not permit complete early adoption. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding lease reporting. The guidance requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of more than 12 months. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued guidance under the simplification initiative regarding stock compensation. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted provided that all amendments are adopted in the same period. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding credit losses on financial instruments including loans. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 including interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact on its financial position and results of operations.

In August 2016, the FASB issued guidance regarding the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted provided that all amendments are adopted in the same period. The Company has ~~early~~ adopted the guidance, which had no material impact on its financial position, ~~and~~ results of ~~operations.~~operations or presentation of the statement of cash flows.

There have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, that are of significance, or potential significance, to us.

Note B – Stock-Based Compensation and Warrants

The Company has stock-based compensation plans and reports stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards based on the estimated grant date fair value. The value of the compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the award (generally the option vesting term).

The Company estimates fair value using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Assumptions used to estimate compensation expense are determined as follows:

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)~~

·	Expected term is determined under the simplified method using an average of the contractual term and vesting period of the award as appropriate statistical data required to properly estimate the expected term was not available;

·	Expected volatility of award grants made under the ~~Company’s~~Company's plans is measured using the historical daily changes in the market price of the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock over the expected term of the award and contemplation of future activity;

·	Risk-free interest rate is the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards; and,

·	Forfeitures are based on the history of cancellations of awards granted by the Company and ~~management’s~~management's analysis of potential future forfeitures.

The Company has several employee stock option and officer and director stock option plans that have been approved by the shareholders of the Company. The plans require that options be granted at a price not less than market on the date of grant and are more fully discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

The following table summarizes the ~~Company’s~~Company's stock option activity during the first three months of fiscal ~~2016:~~2017:

Weighted
Weighted Average
Average Remaining Aggregate Aggregate
Exercise Price Contractual Fair Instrinsic
Shares Per Share Term (1) Value (3) Value (2)

Outstanding July 1, 2015 1,203,200 $0.58 3.03 $    275,800 $                -
Granted                     - - -                   -                -
Exercised                     - - -                   -                -
Forfeited or expired          (3,200) $1.50 - (2,300)                -
Outstanding September 30, 2015 1,200,000 $0.58 2.78 $ 273,500 $                -
Exercisable September 30, 2015 1,122,000 $0.59 2.69 $ 259,800 $                -

(1) Remaining contractual term presented in years.
(2) The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
awards and the closing price of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2015, for those awards that
have an exercise price currently below the closing price as of September 30, 2015 of $0.19.
(3) Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based
compensation.
11

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

								Weighted
						Weighted		Average
						Average		Remaining		Aggregate		Aggregate
						Exercise Price		Contractual		Fair		Intrinsic
				Shares		Per Share		Term (1)		Value (3)		Value (2)

Outstanding July 1, 2016					1,200,000	$	0.58		2.03	$	273,500	$	-
			Granted		-		-		-		-		-
			Exercised		-		-		-		-		-
			Forfeited or expired		-		-		-		-		-
Outstanding September 30, 2016					1,200,000	$	0.58		1.78	$	273,500	$	-
Exercisable September 30, 2016					1,200,000	$	0.58		1.78	$	273,500	$	-

	(1	)	Remaining contractual term presented in years.
	(2	)	The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
			awards and the closing price of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 2016, for those awards that
			have an exercise price currently below the closing price as of September 30, 2016 of $0.18.
	(3	)	Aggregate Fair Value is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based
			compensation on the date of grant.

As of September 30, ~~2015, the Company had approximately $13,800 of~~2016, there was no unamortized Black Scholes value ~~related to outstanding stock options. The unamortized amount is scheduled~~remaining to be ~~expensed in~~recognized as stock-based compensation expense.

As of September 30, 2016, the ~~next quarter. There were no new grants~~Company had 140,000 outstanding warrants. The following table summarizes the Company's warrant activity during the ~~current quarter.~~quarter ended September 30, 2016:

	Warrants Outstanding					Warrants Exercisable
				Weighted					Weighted
	Number of			Average		Number of			Average
	Shares			Exercise Price		Shares			Exercise Price
Warrants Outstanding, July 1, 2016		140,000	$		0.75		20,000	$		0.75
Granted		-			-		-			-
Previously Granted, Vested		-			-		30,000			0.75
Exercised		-			-		-			-
Canceled/Expired		-			-		-			-
Warrants Outstanding, September 30, 2016		140,000	$		0.75		50,000	$		0.75

Note C – Note Receivable – Related Party

Note receivable at September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 represents a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC ("ACC"), a related party. Note receivable at September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 consists of the following:

1112

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

~~Note C – Note Receivable~~

		September 30,				June 30,
		2016				2016
Note receivable, gross	$		295,400		$		295,400
Accounting and loan fees reversed against deferred income			(29,000	)			(29,000	)
Less reserve			(266,400	)			(266,400	)
Note receivable, net	$		-		$		-

~~Note receivable~~The gross balance of ~~$305,600 and $322,800~~$295,400 at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015, respectively,~~2016 represents the outstanding amount drawn by ACC on a $295,400 credit line provided by the Company. The note ~~due from American Citizenship Center, LLC (“ACC”), a related party. In August 2015,~~is secured by all assets of ACC and bears interest at the ~~Company modified the loan agreement by revising the maturity data to August 31, 2017. All other terms of the note, including the interest~~ rate of 9.5% per annum. Interest of $2,300 is unpaid at September 30, 2016.

ACC's business plan is based on the Executive Action, known as DAPA, issued by President Obama in November 2014. In February 2015, twenty-six states filed a lawsuit to stop the program and ~~minimum monthly required payments~~the court granted an injunction meaning that the U.S. Government cannot proceed with rolling out the program. The U.S. government appealed the lawsuit which went to the 5^th Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was unsuccessful and in January 2016, the Supreme Court granted an oral hearing which was held in April 2016. In June 2016, the Supreme Court announced that the justice votes were even for and against the DAPA case, effectively a no decision. As a result, it is presumed that the case will go back to trial at the District Court in Texas. Due to the uncertainty of the ~~greater of $5,000 or 10% of ACC’s gross monthly revenues remained the same. Based on the minimum monthly payments of $5,000,~~court case and overall immigration reform, the Company has ~~classified $60,000~~fully reserved for the amount of the note as ~~current and $245,600 of the note as long-term as~~ of September 30, ~~2015. ACC is currently in compliance with all terms of the August 2015 amendment. No provision for collectability has been recorded as of September 30, 2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

Note D – ~~Land,~~Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

During the fiscal year 2016, Alanco's Board of Directors approved a formal plan to sell its 160 acre owned and undeveloped land and associated permits known as Indian Mesa. The plan was contemplated because the Company is expanding into other markets that are unrelated to waste disposal. The Company is utilizing the services of an investment banker to represent the Company in the sale of these assets and expects the sale to occur within one year. Accordingly, the Assets Held for Sale of $1,653,500 presented in the attached condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 represents the Indian Mesa land and associated permits. The classification of the assets to Assets Held for Sale does not affect the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the Indian Mesa land is undeveloped and has no associated discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a loss from discontinued operations in the amount of $176,000 which represents an accrual related to the judgment received from litigation whereby the Company is a defendant and counterclaimant involving the Company's former subsidiary known as Alanco/TSI Prism, Inc. ("TSI") and the purchaser of TSI's assets, Black Creek Systems Corp. ("Black Creek"). The Company vehemently disagrees with Black Creek's attorney's fees claim and the Court ruling and intends to vigorously pursue an appeal of the judgment. The case is more fully described in Note K – Commitments and Contingencies.

Note E – Property and Equipment

~~Land,~~ Property and Equipment, net, at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016 consist of the following:

June 30, 2015 Additions September 30, 2015
Office furniture and equipment $                   51,300 $                        - $                       51,300
Water disposal facility            2,219,200                        -               2,219,200
Production equipment                514,400                        -                    514,400
          2,784,900                        -              2,784,900
Less accumulation depreciation              (491,900)           (46,100)                 (538,000)
Land and permit costs            1,645,600                   600               1,646,200
  Net book value $           3,938,600 $          (45,500) $               3,893,100
13

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)


		June 30, 2016				Additions				September 30, 2016
Office furniture and equipment	$		51,300		$		-		$		51,300
Water disposal facility			2,220,900				-				2,220,900
Production equipment			514,400				-				514,400
			2,786,600				-				2,786,600
Less accumulation depreciation			(675,600	)			(45,900	)			(721,500	)
Net book value	$		2,111,000		$		(45,900	)	$		2,065,100

Note EF – Note Payable

Note payable at September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016 consists of the following:

		September 30,				June 30,
		2016				2016
Note payable	$		400,000		$		200,000
Less current			(400,000	)			-
Note payable, long-term	$		-		$		200,000

At September 30, 2016, the Note Payable balance of $400,000 represents the amount drawn against a $500,000 line of credit with the Anderson Family Trust ("Trust") entered into on June 28, 2016. As of September 30, 2016, the line of credit has an available balance of $100,000. The line of credit matures on July 1, 2017 when the full outstanding balance is due. The balance accrues interest at 7% per annum payable monthly and is collateralized by the Company's AES Indian Mesa property. In addition, the Trust was paid a loan fee of $10,000 plus a warrant to purchase 140,000 shares of Alanco Common Stock of which 20,000 warrants vested immediately and 10,000 warrants vest each month thereafter.. The exercise price per share for the warrants is $0.50 per share for one half of each vested group and $1.00 for the other half of each vested group with a five year term following the issuance date. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of stock-based awards.

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company expensed approximately $5,500, in interest related to the note, approximately $3,600 related to amortization of deferred loan costs, and approximately $1,800 related to the value of 30,000 warrants which vested during the current quarter. The line of credit has a provision allowing the lender, at the lender's option, to convert up to the full amount of the credit line into shares of a then available class of preferred stock outstanding any time prior to the full repayment of the line of credit. There is currently no such preferred stock outstanding and the rights and privileges of preferred stock have not been determined.

Note G – Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted loss per share of common stock was computed by dividing net ~~income (loss)~~loss, loss from continuing operations and loss from discontinued operations by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

Diluted earnings per share are computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and dilutive securities outstanding during the ~~period using the treasury stock method.~~period. Dilutive securities are any options, warrants, convertible debt, and preferred stock that are freely exercisable into common stock at less than the prevailing market price. Dilutive securities are not included in the weighted average number of shares when inclusion would increase the earnings per share or decrease the loss per share. For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, there were no dilutive securities included in the loss per share calculation as the effect would be antidilutive. Considering all ~~holders’~~holders' rights, total common stock equivalents issuable under these potentially dilutive securities are approximately ~~1,200,000~~1,340,000 and ~~814,000~~1,200,000 at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Note FH – Equity

The Company did not issue any shares of Common Stock during the three months ended September 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

During the three months ended September 30, ~~1015,~~2016, the Company recognized the value of ~~stock-based compensation~~exercisable detachable warrants issued with debt in the amount of ~~$13,900.~~

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)~~

In December 2011, the Company announced that its board of directors had authorized a stock repurchase program whereby the Company could repurchase up to 2 million shares of its outstanding common stock over the next 12 months. The stock repurchase program was extended, under the same limitation, through December 31, 2013. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the board of directors renewed the stock repurchase program, extending it through December 31, 2015. There were no shares repurchased under the program in the current quarter.$1,800.

The Company has authorized 25,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of which 5,000,000 shares have been allocated to Series A, 500,000 have been allocated to Series B, 400,000 have been allocated to Series C Junior Participating, 500,000 have been allocated to Series D, and 750,000 have been allocated to Series E. At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, no Preferred Stock of any series was issued or outstanding.

Note GI - Contingent Payments

Contingent payments at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, 2015 relate to AES asset purchase transactions completed in conjunction with the construction of water disposal facilities for the treatment and disposal of produced water generated by oil and natural gas producers in Western Colorado. Details of the contingent payments2016 are as follows:

		September 30,			June 30,
		2016			2016
Contingent land payment	$		677,400	$		672,700
Less current portion			-			-
Contingent payments, long-term	$		677,400	$		672,700

September 30, June 30,
2015 2015
Contingent land payment $          658,600 $       653,900
         Less current portion           (25,000)       (50,000)
Contingent payments, long-term $          633,600 $       603,900

Contingent land payment of ~~$658,600~~$677,400 at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 represents the net present value of $800,000 of estimated contingent land payments due under an agreement whereby Alanco Energy Services, Inc. ~~(“AES”~~("AES") acquired 160 acres of land known as Indian Mesa. The maximum total of $800,000 of contingent land payments is based upon 10% of quarterly revenues in excess of operating expenses up to $200,000 per quarter for activity at both the Deer Creek and the Indian Mesa locations. The payments were projected considering current operating plans as approved by the Alanco Board of Directors, with the payments discounted at a rate of 3% per annum. Accretion expense is being imputed at 3% per annum, increasing the fair value of the contingent land payment during the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 by $4,700. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, no contingent land payment was earned or payable under the contingency formula. AtThe contingent land payment is an obligation of the Company which will not be transferred to the buyer of the Indian Mesa land and associated permits discussed in Note D - Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. The Company will maintain the liability for contingent payments resulting from future revenues on the Indian Mesa land resulting from the buyer's operations.

The Company also has a contingent purchase price liability with TC Operating, LLC ("TCO") under the original agreement executed in April 2012 which transferred the Deer Creek facility land lease to the Company. TCO can earn additional purchase price payments based upon a percentage of the net cumulative EBITDA (net of all related AES capital investments) over a period of approximately 10 years (contingent purchase price), approximately the initial term of the lease. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016 and June 30, 2016, the Company ~~reduced~~had no liability recorded for the ~~current portion~~contingent purchase price based on the probability of the contingent ~~land~~ payment ~~to $25,000 to reflect its short-term estimate of the obligation.~~being realized.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

Note HJ – Asset Retirement Obligation

The Company has recognized estimated asset retirement obligations (closure cost) of ~~$429,700~~$434,000 at September 30, 2016 to remove leasehold improvements, remediate any pollution issues and return the Deer Creek water disposal property to its natural state at the conclusion of the ~~Company’s~~Company's lease. The closure process is a requirement of both the Deer Creek lease and the State of Colorado, a permitting authority for such facilities. The closure cost estimate, in current dollars, was completed by an approved independent consultant experienced in estimating closure costs for water disposal operations and the estimated amount was approved by the State of Colorado. A present value discount has not been taken as the estimated closure costs, excluding regulatory changes and inflation adjustments, are anticipated to remain fairly consistent over the operational life of the facility.

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)~~

The Company reviews the asset retirement obligation quarterly and performs a formal annual assessment of its estimates to determine if an adjustment to the value of the asset retirement obligation is required.

The laws of the State of Colorado require companies to meet environmental and asset retirement obligations by selecting an approved payment method. The Company has elected to meet its obligation by making quarterly payments of approximately $4,700 into a trust that, over the expected lease period, will build liquid assets to meet the asset retirement obligation. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company made the required quarterly payments. The balances in the trust account for the asset retirement obligation as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$72,100~~$90,800 and ~~$67,400,~~$86,100, respectively.

Note IK – Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

The Company is a defendant and counterclaimant in litigation involving its former subsidiary ~~TSI Dissolution Corp. (formerly~~ known as Alanco/TSI Prism, Inc. ~~(“TSI”)~~("TSI") and the purchaser of ~~TSI’s~~TSI's assets, Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp. ("Black Creek"). Black Creek filed a complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court against TSI and the Company, being Civil Case ~~NO.~~No. CV2011-014175, claiming various offsets from the purchase price, primarily concerning inventory adjustments, and TSI counterclaimed for monies due from Black Creek under the purchase agreement. Following a trial during fiscal 2014, the court awarded a net judgment in favor of Black Creek in the amount of $16,800, plus ~~attorney’s~~attorney's fees and accrued interest, resulting in a total judgment in the amount of ~~$128,300 for which~~$128,300. At June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an accrued liability ~~at June 30, 2014. In addition,~~of $128,300 for the ~~Company~~judgment and had posted a bond with the court in conjunction with the ~~Company’s~~Company's appeal of the judgment. In May 2015, the State of Arizona Division One Court of Appeals vacated the trial ~~court’s~~court's damages award and remanded to the trial court to direct the parties to follow dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement. In addition, the appellate ~~court’s~~court's decision vacated the trial ~~court’s attorney’s fee~~court's attorney's fees award and ~~stated that~~awarded TSI ~~is entitled to an award~~approximately $21,900 of its fees on appeal. ~~As a result, at~~At June 30, 2015, the Company reversed the accrual of $128,300 for the prior judgment. ~~The~~Under the court's direction, the Company ~~is currently following the court’s direction and working under~~followed the dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase ~~agreement.~~agreement which resulted in an award to Black Creek of approximately $13,000. The Company ~~believes~~has previously stipulated that it owed Black Creek approximately $9,600 for shared expenses incurred from 2010 - 2011. In October 2016, the ~~lower court’s~~court ruled on Black Creek's attorney's fees application and the Company's answer to said application. The court granted Black Creek a fee award which, when combined with the judgment ~~failed to address, among other matters, inventory reserves established for the specific items~~amount of ~~inventory which were the subject of Black Creek’s concerns, which if properly addressed would result~~approximately $22,600 plus interest, results in a ~~net judgment in favor of~~potential liability to the Company ~~with an attendant award~~ of ~~attorney’s fees in favor of the Company. Therefore, no accrual for the loss contingency was deemed necessary~~approximately $176,000 which has been accrued at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016 and reported as a loss from discontinued operations in the current quarter. The Company vehemently disagrees with Black Creek's attorney's fees claim and the Court ruling and intends to vigorously pursue an appeal of the judgment.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)

The Company may from time to time be involved in litigation arising from the normal course of business. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, other than the litigation discussed above, there was no such litigation pending deemed material by the Company.

Note JL – Related Party Transactions

At September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and June 30, ~~2015~~2016, the Company had a note due from American Citizenship Center, LLC ~~(“ACC”~~("ACC"), a related party, with ~~balances~~a gross balance of ~~$305,600 and $322,800, respectively. Refer to Note C – Note Receivable for further discussion.~~$295,400 which has been fully reserved. During the ~~three months ended September 30, 2015~~current quarter, the Company billed ACC a total of approximately ~~$7,500~~$7,100 for interest ~~on the note.~~ of which $2,300 is unpaid at September 30, 2016.

At September 30, ~~2015,~~2016 and June 30, 2016, the Company had ~~unpaid receivables from ACC~~accrued board fees in the total amount of ~~$6,600, consisting~~$28,000 and $14,000, respectively.

At September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016, the Company had accrued deferred compensation of ~~$4,900 representing two months~~$58,400 payable to John Carlson, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and a Director of ~~interest and $1,700 of legal fees. All required payments have been subsequently paid.~~the Company.

Note KM – Subsequent Events

~~There have been no significant subsequent events.~~

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (continued)~~Subsequent to September 30, 2016, the Company drew an additional $100,000 from its line of credit with the Anderson Family Trust resulting in a current balance of $500,000, the full amount of the credit line.

Note LN – Liquidity and Going Concern

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company reported a net loss of ($~~403,300)~~479,600) and for fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company reported a net loss of ($~~900,600)~~1,594,800). ~~Historically, the Company had relied on the liquidation of its investment in Marketable Securities to fund working capital needs.~~ The ~~Company sold all remaining marketable securities during~~Company's fiscal ~~2015. These factors raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the next year. The Company’s fiscal 2016~~2017 operating plan ~~contemplates development~~includes divestiture of the undeveloped AES Indian Mesa ~~site. In order to develop~~site which is currently classified as Assets Held for Sale. Management cannot assure that the sale of Indian Mesa ~~site,~~will be finalized which would provide additional cash flow to the Company. The Company is continuing to analyze options to monetize current and future operations of Deer Creek. There is no assurance that the Company will ~~need~~be able to execute options for Deer Creek. The Company announced it is entering the behavioral health market and the business plan includes the acquisition of behavioral health businesses which requires capital. There is no assurance the Company will be able to raise additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both. ~~Management cannot assure that it will secure additional financing in order to achieve projections.~~ If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the ~~Company’s~~Company's business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected. Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital ~~needs or the Company may seek to sell assets. Accordingly, the~~needs. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the ~~Company’s~~Company's independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2015~~2016 discussing the substantial doubt of the ~~Company’s~~Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

1517

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Item 2 - ~~MANAGEMENT’S~~MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Current Status of Deer Creek facility

The Deer Creek produced water disposal facility, located near Grand Junction, CO, became operational in August 2012 with annual evaporative capacity of approximately 300,000 barrels without using enhanced evaporation methods, providing some Piceance Basin producers with significant transportation cost savings compared to alternative water disposal sites. In November 2014, the facility received approval from the Mesa County Board of Commissioners allowing 24 hours a day, seven days per week operations for two years with an administrative review conductedWater deliveries have been negatively impacted by the ~~Planning Division after one year. During fiscal year 2015,~~falling market prices of oil and gas which significantly reduced drilling activities and fracking in the ~~facility experienced anaerobic bacterial conditions~~region and resulted in ~~its evaporation ponds~~the temporary closing of many of the producing oil and ~~as a result, restricted water intake during~~gas wells in the ~~fourth quarter 2015 and first quarter 2016 while it was treating the ponds.~~area. The ~~pond conditions have significantly improved and the~~ Company is ~~currently following a bioremediation maintenance program~~continuing to ~~maintain pond health. The Company anticipates increased water revenues during the second quarter~~analyze options to monetize current and future operations of ~~fiscal 2016 which will be achieved by allowing increased water deliveries as well as an increase to the average sales price per barrel for water deliveries.~~Deer Creek.

Current Status of Indian Mesa facility

The permitting process for the Indian Mesa facility, located approximately 4 miles North West of the Deer Creek site, has been in process for a number of years with an initial County Use Permit issued in 2010 covering, among other things, evaporation ponds and land farming. In December 2013, in response to an AES request to amend its County User Permit ~~(“CUP”~~("CUP"), the Mesa County Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a new CUP for AES to construct and operate on its 160 acre Indian Mesa site evaporation ponds and/or landfill for disposal of solid oil and gas (O&G) waste, such as drill cuttings, tank bottoms, sock filters, etc. The county approval also allows for solid and produced water disposal of Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and Technically Enhanced Naturally-Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM)., and is in the permitting process with the State of Colorado. In June 2014 AES received final construction approval from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) for twelve produced water disposal ~~ponds, which if developed as planned, would be located on the north 80 acres of the Indian Mesa site.~~ponds.

1618

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

The capacity of Indian Mesa is dependent on its type of ~~development, which the Company is still planning.~~development. If 80 acres is developed as 12 ponds as discussed above, the annual capacity at Indian Mesa for produced water, not considering enhanced evaporation, would be approximately 1 million barrels. If the remaining 80 acres were developed into landfills, the capacity would be approximately 3 million cubic yards. If the entire 160 acres were developed into landfill, the solid waste capacity would increase to approximately 8 million cubic yards. Complete build-out of its Indian Mesa facility, including both landfill and evaporative ponds, would result in a unique Western Colorado ~~“one~~"one stop ~~shop”~~shop" for all O&G waste products, including NORM and TENORM contaminated waste streams. During fiscal year 2016, Alanco's Board of Directors approved a formal plan to sell Indian Mesa, consisting of land and associated permits. Accordingly, the land and associated permit costs are being presented as "Assets Held for Sale" in the attached condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2016 and June 30, 2016.

Alanco Behavioral Health, Inc.

During the current quarter, the Company formed Alanco Behavioral Health, Inc. ("ABH"), a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated in the State of Arizona. The venture will be led by David C. Johnson, President of ABH. The Company launched ABH to pursue its business plan to consolidate small cap private behavioral health companies through acquisition. The Company's objective is to create a market leader in behavioral health treatment services helping people and their families while adding value to the Company's shareholders through strong revenue growth and cash flow. On September 23, 2016 the Company executed a Letter of Intent to purchase the operations of Bella Monte Recovery, LLC, its first planned acquisition in the behavioral health market. The Company is in the process of performing due diligence with a target closing date by the end of the calendar year.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

~~Management’s~~Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions concerning the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation ~~expense recognition,~~and detachable warrants, realization of deferred tax assets, collectability of accounts and ~~notes receivables,~~note receivable, estimated useful lives and carrying value of fixed assets, the recorded values of accruals and contingencies, ~~including~~ the estimated fair values of the ~~Company’s~~Company's asset retirement obligation and the contingent land and purchase price liabilities, and the ~~Company’s~~Company's ability to continue as a going concern. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The result of these estimates and judgments form the basis for making conclusions about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The SEC suggests that all registrants discuss their most ~~“critical~~"critical accounting ~~policies”~~policies" in ~~Management’s~~Management's Discussion and Analysis. A critical accounting policy is one which is both important to the portrayal of the ~~Company’s~~Company's financial condition and results and requires ~~management’s~~management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has identified the critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that affect its more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. The ~~Company’s~~Company's Audit Committee has reviewed and approved the critical accounting policies identified. These policies include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, ~~realization~~estimated useful lives and carrying value of ~~note receivable, stock-based compensation,~~fixed assets, classification of assets as held for sale, the recorded values of accruals and fair values of assets and liabilities including the ~~Company’s~~Company's contingent liabilities.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

The Company uses four factors to determine the appropriate timing of revenue recognition. Three of these factors are generally factual considerations that are not subject to material estimates (evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been performed and the fee is determinable). The fourth factor includes judgment regarding the collectability of the sales price. The ~~Company’s~~Company's written arrangement with customers establishes payment terms and the Company only enters into arrangements when it has reasonable assurance that it will receive payment from the customer. The assessment of a ~~customer’s~~customer's credit-worthiness is reliant on ~~management’s~~management's judgment on factors such as credit references and market reputation. If any sales are made that become uncollectible, the Company establishes a reserve for the uncollectible amount. Any sales tax for which the Company is responsible is recorded as a reduction of the associated revenue.

17Estimated Useful Lives and Carrying Value of Fixed Assets

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

~~Realization of Note Receivable~~

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~Classification of Assets as Held for Sale

The Company reclassifies assets as held for sale based on meeting the criteria for the classification including approval of a formal plan to sell assets by the Company's Board of Directors. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, the Board of Directors approved a formal plan to sell the land and associated permits and therefore the Company has ~~stock-based compensation plans and~~classified the ~~associated compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.~~assets as Assets Held for Sale. The Company ~~estimates~~is using an investment banker to represent the fair value of stock-based compensation using the Black-Scholes valuation model using the following inputs: the plain-vanilla method for expected term based on the contractual term and vesting period of the award, the expected volatility of daily changesCompany in the ~~market price~~sale of these assets and expects the ~~Company’s common stock, the assumed risk-free interest rate and an assumption of future forfeitures based on historical cancellations and management’s analysis of potential forfeitures.~~sale to occur within six months.

Recorded Values of Accruals

The Company makes accruals for contingent liabilities based on reasonable estimates for known or anticipated obligations. Estimates may be based on known inputs, experience with similar situations, or anticipated outcomes. Estimates for the ~~Company’s~~Company's asset retirement obligation, contingent land and ~~contingent payments~~purchase price liabilities are determined at discrete points in time based upon unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that is significant to the fair value of the liability, therefore requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions. Estimates for the asset retirement obligation were developed by a consultant knowledgeable about the State of Colorado regulatory requirements and use vendor estimates for the various activities required for the closure of the Deer Creek facility. Estimates for the contingent ~~payments~~land and purchase price liabilities were ~~calculated~~determined based on projected income, cash flows and capital expenditures for the Deer Creek and Indian Mesa facilities under current plans.

Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities

The Company estimates fair values for assets and liabilities at certain points in time based on information known at that time using the Accounting Standards Codification ~~(“ASC”~~("ASC") and recognizes transfers as they occur. The ASC uses a three level hierarchy: Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets, Level 2 – observable inputs, other than quoted prices included with Level 1, and Level 3 – unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists that are significant to the fair value. The asset retirement obligation and contingent payments discussed above use Level 3 inputs.

Results of Operations

Presented below is ~~management’s~~management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated:

(A)	Three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 versus three months ended September 30, ~~2014~~2015

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Net revenues reported for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 were ~~$114,300~~$3,800 versus ~~$225,300~~$114,300 for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2015, a decrease of ~~$111,000,~~$110,500, or ~~49.3%~~96.7%. Revenues are comprised of produced water

delivery fees and sales of reclaimed oil (net of associated taxes). The decrease in net revenues reflects the Company’s restricted water intake while it was treating the ponds. The pond conditions have significantly improved and the Company anticipates increased revenues during the second quarter of fiscal 2016. Water deliveries areRevenues were negatively impacted by the falling market prices of oil and gas which ~~drives~~significantly reduced drilling activities and fracking in the region and resulted in the ~~restriction on drilling during winter months which negatively impact water deliveries,~~temporary closing of many of the producing oil and ~~alternative uses of produced water, such~~gas wells in the area. The Company anticipates the revenues will return as ~~for fracking fluid that some current~~oil and ~~potential customers are utilizing.~~gas prices improve.

Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $90,400 and ~~2014 were~~ $260,400, ~~and $186,300,~~ respectively, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$74,100~~$170,000 or ~~39.8%~~65.3% when comparing the periods. Cost of revenues consists of direct labor costs, equipment costs (including depreciation), land lease costs, pond maintenance and other operating costs. The ~~increase~~decrease is primarily due to ~~higher~~lower pond maintenance costs ~~including pond treatments to manage anaerobic bacterial conditions offset by~~in the current period as well as decreases in variable costs resulting from decreased revenues such as fees tied to water ~~volumes, plus a reduction to equipment rental costs for a system rented in the prior year which was subsequently purchased.~~volumes. Fixed costs such as depreciation, amortization ~~accretion~~ and lease costs represent approximately ~~22.7%~~68.6% and ~~30.4%~~22.7% of the cost of revenues for three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. The gross ~~margin~~loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were ($86,600) and ~~2014 were (127.8%) and 17.3%~~($146,100), respectively. The ~~negative swing~~decrease in gross ~~profit~~loss between the two periods is primarily the result of ~~reduced revenues combined with increased~~decreased pond maintenance costs in the current quarter. The gross loss in the current quarter is primarily due to the increased pond maintenance costs mentioned above. Without these extra costs of approximately $117,000, the Company would have had a gross loss of approximately ($29,100), or (25.5%), which would significantly decrease the negative swing in gross profit (loss) between the two periods.

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 (consisting of corporate expenses, AES selling, general and administrative expense and stock-based compensation) was ~~$264,600,~~$213,100, a decrease of ~~$11,000,~~$51,500, or 4%19.5%, compared to ~~$275,600~~$264,600 reported for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. Corporate expenses for the current quarter was ~~$93,700~~$73,600 and represented ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$32,600,~~$20,100, or ~~53.4%~~21.5%, compared to corporate expenses of ~~$61,100~~$93,700 reported for the comparable quarter ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015. The net ~~increase~~decrease is primarily comprised of ~~costs related~~reductions to professional services offset by ~~a decrease~~costs related to ~~payroll and associated employee benefit costs.~~corporate development for activities related to the Alanco Behavioral Health, Inc. subsidiary. AES expense of $139,500 for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 compared to $157,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 ~~compared to $199,500 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014~~ reflects a decrease of ~~$42,500~~$17,500 or ~~21.3%~~11.1% when comparing the two periods and primarily reflects a decrease in the ~~operations~~ management fees for the operations of the Deer Creek facility. Stock-based compensation was ~~$13,900~~$0 for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, a decrease of ~~$1,100,~~$13,900, or ~~7.3%~~100%, compared to ~~$15,000~~$13,900 reported for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2014.~~2015.

Operating loss for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ($~~410,700)~~299,700), a decrease of ~~$174,100,~~$111,000, or ~~73.6%~~27.0%, compared to an operating loss of ($~~236,600)~~410,700) reported for the same quarter of the prior year. The ~~increased~~decreased operating loss resulted ~~primarily~~ from the reduced gross loss ~~of ($146,100) for~~combined with the ~~quarter ended September 30, 2015 compared to a gross profit of $39,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, offset by a decrease of $11,000 in~~reduced selling, general and administrative expenses during the current quarter as compared to the same quarter of the previous year as discussed above.

Other Income and Expense

Interest income for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ~~$7,400,~~$7,100, a decrease of ~~$4,100,~~$300, or ~~35.7%~~4.1%, when compared to interest income of ~~$11,500~~$7,400 for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2014. The decrease in interest income related primarily to a decrease in the average outstanding balance of the ACC note receivable.~~2015.

~~The Company did not have any sales of marketable securities during~~Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was $11,000. There was no interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The interest in the current period includes interest on the line of credit with the Anderson Family Trust entered into in June 2016, as well as amortization of associated loan costs and amortization of the value of detachable warrants.

Loss From Continuing Operations

The loss from continuing operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was ($303,600), a decrease of $99,700, or 24.7%, compared to an operating loss of ($403,300) reported for the same quarter of the prior year. The decreased loss from continuing operations resulted from the reduced gross loss combined with the reduced selling, general and administrative expense, offset by an increase to interest expense during the current quarter as compared to the same quarter of the previous year.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Loss From Discontinued Operations

During the quarter ended September 30, ~~2014,~~2016, the Company recorded ~~net gains on~~an accrual of $176,000 related to the ~~sale~~judgment received from litigation whereby the Company is a defendant and counterclaimant involving the Company's former subsidiary known Alanco/TSI PRISM, Inc. ("TSI") and the purchaser of ~~marketable securities of $46,700, resulting from the sale of 45,000 shares of its ORBCOMM Common Stock at an average selling price of $6.20 per share and average cost of $5.16 per share.~~TSI's assets, Black Creek Systems Corp.

Net loss for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 amounted to ($~~403,300)~~479,600), or ($~~.08)~~.10) per share, compared to net loss of ($~~178,200)~~403,300), or ($~~.04)~~.08) per share, in the comparable quarter of the prior year for reasons previously discussed.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The ~~Company’s~~Company's current assets at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 exceeded current liabilities by ~~$368,900,~~$817,600, resulting in a current ratio of ~~2.2~~1.9 to 1. At June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, current assets exceeded current liabilities by ~~$670,600~~$1,449,500 reflecting a current ratio of ~~2.7~~4.6 to 1. The reduction in net current assets at September 30, ~~2015~~2016 versus June 30, ~~2015~~2016 was due primarily to a reduction in cash balances and ~~prepaid~~an increase to accrued expenses and ~~other current assets.~~

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

Accounts receivable – trade, net of $54,700 represents the outstanding billings at September 30, 2015 of the AES water disposal operation. Other receivables – related party totaling $6,600 at September 30, 2015 represents billings to ACC for interest of $4,900 and legal fees of $1,700.short-term note payable.

Cash used in operations for the three month period ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was ($~~280,300)~~330,200), an increase of ~~$253,700,~~$49,900, or ~~953.8%~~17.8% compared to ($~~26,600)~~280,300) reported for the same period of the prior year. The increase in net cash used in operations for the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 was due primarily to ~~an increase in operating loss, a decrease to accounts payable and accrued expenses offset by~~ a decrease in prepaid expenses and other ~~current~~ assets, offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses as compared to the same period of the prior year.

~~Cash~~There was no cash provided or used by investing activities for the three month period ended September 30, 2016. During the three month period ended September 30, 2015, cash provided by investing activities was $16,600 ~~a decrease of $149,200, or 90% compared to the $165,800~~and represented proceeds provided ~~for the same period~~by repayments of the ~~prior year. The decrease was primarily due to lower proceeds from the sale of marketable securities and repayment of~~ note receivable ~~during~~in the ~~period~~amount of $17,200 offset by ~~a decrease in~~ the purchase of land, property and equipment ~~as compared to~~in the ~~prior year. Purchases~~amount of ~~land, property and equipment include permitting costs~~$600.

Cash provided by financing activities was $200,000 for the ~~Indian Mesa site~~three month period ended September 30, 2016 and represents proceeds from the ~~purchase~~Company's line of ~~equipment for~~credit with the ~~Deer Creek facility.~~

Anderson Family Trust. There was no cash ~~used~~provided or ~~provided~~used by financing activities for the three month ~~periods~~period ended September 30, ~~2015 and 2014.~~2015.

~~During~~The Company's fiscal ~~2016, the Company’s~~year 2017 operating plan ~~contemplates development~~includes divestiture of the undeveloped AES Indian Mesa ~~site. In order to develop~~land and associated permits, which is currently classified as Assets Held for Sale. Management cannot assure that the sale of Indian Mesa ~~site,~~will be finalized which would provide additional cash flow to the Company. The Company is continuing to analyze options to monetize current and future operations of Deer Creek. There is no assurance that the Company will ~~need~~be able to execute options for Deer Creek. The Company announced it is entering the behavioral health market and the business plan includes the acquisition of behavioral health businesses which requires capital. There is no assurance the Company will be able to raise additional financing which may be in the form of public or private debt or equity financing, or both. ~~Management cannot assure that it will secure additional financing in order to achieve projections.~~ If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the ~~Company’s~~Company's business, operating results, financial condition and ability to continue operations may be materially adversely affected. Management has historically been successful in obtaining financing and has demonstrated the ability to implement a number of cost-cutting initiatives to reduce working capital ~~needs or the Company may seek to sell assets. Accordingly, the~~needs. The accompanying ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate and do not include any ~~adjustment~~adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. As a result, the ~~Company’s~~Company's independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph regarding an uncertainty about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern in their audit opinion on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2015~~2016 which is further discussed in the ~~Company’s~~Company's Form 10-K for that period.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to smaller reporting company.

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

Item 4 - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(b) CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Legal Proceedings - The Company is a defendant and counterclaimant in litigation involving its former subsidiary ~~TSI Dissolution Corp. (formerly~~ known as Alanco/TSI Prism, Inc. ~~(“TSI”)~~("TSI") and the purchaser of ~~TSI’s~~TSI's assets, Black Creek Integrated Systems Corp. ("Black Creek"). Black Creek filed a complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court against TSI and the Company, being Civil Case ~~NO.~~No. CV2011-014175, claiming various offsets from the purchase price, primarily concerning inventory adjustments, and TSI counterclaimed for monies due from Black Creek under the purchase agreement. Following a trial during fiscal 2014, the court awarded a net judgment in favor of Black Creek in the amount of $16,800, plus ~~attorney’s~~attorney's fees and accrued interest, resulting in a total judgment in the amount of ~~$128,300 for which~~$128,300. At June 30, 2014, the Company recorded an accrued liability ~~at June 30, 2014. In addition,~~of $128,300 for the ~~Company~~judgment and had posted a bond with the court in conjunction with the ~~Company’s~~Company's appeal of the judgment. In May 2015, the State of Arizona Division One Court of Appeals vacated the trial ~~court’s~~court's damages award and remanded to the trial court to direct the parties to follow dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase agreement. In addition, the appellate ~~court’s~~court's decision vacated the trial ~~court’s attorney’s fee~~court's attorney's fees award and ~~stated that~~awarded TSI ~~is entitled to an award~~approximately $21,900 of its fees on appeal. ~~As a result, at~~At June 30, 2015, the Company reversed the accrual of $128,300 for the prior judgment. ~~The~~Under the court's direction, the Company ~~is currently following the court’s direction and working under~~followed the dispute guidelines defined in the asset purchase ~~agreement.~~agreement which resulted in an award to Black Creek of approximately $13,000. The Company ~~believes~~has previously stipulated that it owed Black Creek approximately $9,600 for shared expenses incurred from 2010 - 2011. In October 2016, the ~~lower court’s~~court ruled on Black Creek's attorney's fees application and the Company's answer to said application. The court granted Black Creek a fee award which, when combined with the judgment ~~to address, among other matters, inventory reserves established for the specific items~~amount of ~~inventory which were the subject of Black Creek’s concerns, which if properly addressed would result~~approximately $22,600 plus interest, results in a ~~net judgment in favor of~~potential liability to the Company ~~with an attendant award~~ of ~~attorney’s fees in favor of the Company. Therefore, no accrual for the loss contingency was deemed necessary~~approximately $176,000 which has been accrued at September 30, ~~2015.~~2016 and reported as a loss from discontinued operations in the current quarter. The Company vehemently disagrees with Black Creek's attorney's fees claim and the Court ruling and intends to vigorously pursue an appeal of the judgment.

The Company may from time to time be involved in litigation arising from the normal course of business. As of September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, there was no such litigation pending deemed material by the Company.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the three months ended September 30, ~~2015,~~2016, no shares of Company stock were sold.

~~ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~

	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer
	32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.

ALANCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

~~(Registrant)~~

		(Registrant)
	By:	/s/ Danielle L. Haney
		Danielle L. Haney
		Chief Financial Officer
		Alanco Technologies, Inc.

November ~~16, 2015~~

14, 2016

2224

Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company	X

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 AND JUNE 30, 2015

				September 30, 2015		June 30, 2015
ASSETS				(unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	525,200	$	788,900
	Accounts receivable - trade, net			54,700		45,900
	Other receivables - related party			6,600		4,200
	Note receivable, current - related party			60,000		60,000
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets			33,200		164,500
		Total current assets		679,700		1,063,500

LAND, PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET				3,893,100		3,938,600

OTHER ASSETS
	Note receivable, long-term - related party			245,600		262,800
	Trust account - asset retirement obligation			72,100		67,400
TOTAL ASSETS			$	4,890,500	$	5,332,300

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable		$	118,100	$	151,100
	Accrued expenses			167,700		191,800
	Contingent payments, current			25,000		50,000
		Total current liabilities		310,800		392,900

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
	Contingent payments, long-term			633,600		603,900
	Asset retirement obligation			429,700		429,700
TOTAL LIABILITIES				1,374,100		1,426,500

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
	Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding			-		-
	Common Stock
		Class A - 75,000,000 no par shares authorized, 4,982,400
		shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015
		and June 30, 2015		109,173,200		109,159,300
	Accumulated Deficit			(105,656,800)		(105,253,500)
		Total shareholders' equity		3,516,400		3,905,800

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY			$	4,890,500	$	5,332,300

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 AND JUNE 30, 2016

		September 30, 2016				June 30, 2016
ASSETS		(unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$		9,400		$		139,600
Accounts receivable - trade, net			200				3,900
Other receivables - related party			2,300				2,800
Assets held for sale			1,653,500				1,653,500
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			63,200				47,300
Total current assets			1,728,600				1,847,100

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET			2,065,100				2,111,000

OTHER ASSETS
Trust account - asset retirement obligation			90,800				86,100
TOTAL ASSETS	$		3,884,500		$		4,044,200

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$		205,200		$		251,400
Accrued expenses			305,800				146,200
Note payable, current			400,000				-
Total current liabilities			911,000				397,600

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Note payable			-				200,000
Contingent payments, long-term			677,400				672,700
Asset retirement obligation			434,000				434,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES			2,022,400				1,704,300

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock - no shares issued or outstanding			-				-
Common Stock
Class A - 75,000,000 no par shares authorized, 4,982,400
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2016
and June 30, 2016			109,190,000				109,188,200
Accumulated Deficit			(107,327,900	)			(106,848,300	)
Total shareholders' equity			1,862,100				2,339,900

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$		3,884,500		$		4,044,200

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

INDEX
					Page Number
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2015~~2016 (Unaudited)			4
			and June 30, ~~2015~~2016

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)			5
			For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015

		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in ~~Shareholders’~~Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)			6
			For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
			For the three months ended September 30, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015		7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)				8
		Note A –		Basis of Presentation, Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
		Note B –		Stock-Based Compensation and Warrants
		Note C –		Note Receivable – Related Party
		Note D –		~~Land,~~ Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations
		Note E –		Property and Equipment
		Note EF –		Note Payable
		Note G –		Earnings Per Share
		Note FH –		Equity
		Note GI –		Contingent Payments
		Note ~~H -~~J –		Asset Retirement Obligation
		Note ~~I -~~K –		Commitments and Contingencies
		Note ~~J -~~L –		Related Party Transactions
		Note ~~K -~~M –		Subsequent Events
		Note LN –		Liquidity and Going Concern

	Item 2.	~~Management’s~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
			and Results of Operations		1618

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			2023

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures			2123

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			2123

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			2124

	Item 6.	Exhibits			2224

Fair Value at September 30, 2015

		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		September 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		658,600		658,600
	$	-	$	-	$	1,088,300	$	1,088,300

Fair Value at June 30, 2015

		Level 1:
		Quoted Prices		Level 2:
		in active		Significant		Level 3:		Total
		Markets		Other		Significant		at
		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		June 30,
		Assets		Inputs		Inputs		2015
Asset Retirement Obligation	$	-	$	-	$	429,700	$	429,700
Contigent Land Payment		-		-		653,900		653,900
	$	-	$	-	$	1,083,600	$	1,083,600