FORM 10-Q

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


(X)        QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
           EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For the quarter ended AprilJuly 2, 1999

           OR

(  )       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
           EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For the transition period from __________ to __________


                          Commission File Number 1-8022

                                 CSX CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                  Virginia                             62-1051971
      (State or other jurisdiction of               (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)              Identification No.)


  901 East Cary Street, Richmond, Virginia            23219-4031
  (Address of principal executive offices)            (Zip Code)

                                 (804) 782-1400
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                    No Change
   (Former name,  former  address and former  fiscal year, if changed since last
    report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (X) No ( )

Indicate the number of shares  outstanding  of each of the  issuer's  classes of
common stock, as of AprilJuly 2, 1999: 217,390,846217,661,923 shares.






                                      - 1 -





                                 CSX CORPORATION
                                    FORM 10-Q
                   FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRILJULY 2, 1999
                                      INDEX




                                                                     Page Number

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1:

Financial Statements

1.         Consolidated Statement of Earnings-
             Quarters and Six Months Ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998     3

2.         Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows-
             QuartersSix Months Ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998                  4

3.         Consolidated Statement of Financial Position-
             At AprilJuly 2, 1999 and December 25, 1998                            5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements                                    6


Item 2:

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition                                           1517


PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                 29

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                    2630

Signature                                                                    2630










                                      - 2 -





                        CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       Consolidated Statement of Earnings
                 (Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited) Quarters Ended Six Months Ended --------------------------- April-------------------------- July 2, March 27,June 26, July 2, June 26, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Operating Revenue $ 2,5412,616 $ 2,4622,490 $ 5,157 $ 4,952 Operating Expense 2,265 2,1842,342 2,154 4,607 4,338 ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Operating Income 276 278274 336 550 614 Other Income (Expense) (35) (29)23 3 (12) (26) Interest Expense 133 123127 124 260 247 ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Earnings before Income Taxes 108 126170 215 278 341 Income Tax Expense 33 3556 64 89 99 ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Earnings before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change 75 91114 151 189 242 Cumulative Effect on Prior Years of Accounting Change for Insurance-RelatedInsurance- Related Assessments, Net of Tax - - (49) - ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Net Earnings $ 26114 $ 91151 $ 140 $ 242 =========== ============ =========== =========== Earnings Per Share: Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change $ .36.54 $ .43.71 $ .90 $ 1.14 Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change - - (.24) - ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Including Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change $ .12.54 $ .43.71 $ .66 $ 1.14 =========== ============ =========== =========== Earnings Per Share, Assuming DilutionDilution: Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change $ .36.53 $ .42.70 $ .89 $ 1.12 Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change (.24) - - (.23) - ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- Including Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change $ .12.53 $ .42.70 $ .66 $ 1.12 =========== ============ =========== =========== Average Common Shares Outstanding (Thousands) 210,124 210,999210,517 211,434 210,321 211,221 =========== ============ =========== =========== Average Common Shares Outstanding, Assuming Dilution (Thousands) 211,658 215,684213,157 215,490 212,407 215,592 =========== ============ =========== =========== Cash Dividends Paid Per Common Share $ .30 $ .30 $ .60 $ .60 =========== ============ =========== ===========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. - 3 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited) QuartersSix Months Ended ----------------------------- AprilJuly 2, March 27,June 26, 1999 1998 ------------- ------------- OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net Earnings $ 26140 $ 91242 Adjustments to Reconcile Net Earnings to Net Cash Provided: Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change 49 - Depreciation 169 156335 312 Deferred Income Taxes 39 1145 61 Equity in Conrail Earnings - Net (13) (23)(22) (59) Other Operating Activities (7) (17)(67) (33) Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities Accounts Receivable (75) (5)(255) (16) Other Current Assets 20 (48)- (82) Accounts Payable (122) (70)(109) (110) Other Current Liabilities (86) (27)39 (26) ------------ ------------ Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities - 68155 289 ------------ ------------ INVESTING ACTIVITIES Property Additions (190) (290)(562) (655) Short-Term Investments - Net 32 5971 146 Other Investing Activities (14) (16)35 (103) ------------ ------------ Net Cash Used by Investing Activities (172) (247)(456) (612) ------------ ------------ FINANCING ACTIVITIES Short-Term Debt - Net 250 169383 133 Long-Term Debt Issued 79 5195 306 Long-Term Debt Repaid (32) (90)(60) (107) Cash Dividends Paid (65) (66)(130) (132) Other Financing Activities (11) (11)- (38) ------------ ------------ Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 221 7388 162 ------------ ------------ Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents 49 (172)87 (161) CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period 105 251 ------------ ------------ Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period 154 79192 90 Short-Term Investments at End of Period 396 380357 293 ------------ ------------ Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments at End of Period $ 550549 $ 459383 ============ ============
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. - 4 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statement of Financial Position (Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited) AprilJuly 2, December 25, 1999 1998 ----------------------- ----------- ASSETS Current Assets Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments $ 550549 $ 533 Accounts Receivable 9861,172 898 Materials and Supplies 234245 225 Deferred Income Taxes 138125 128 Other Current Assets 190197 200 ----------- ----------- Total Current Assets 2,0982,288 1,984 Properties 18,83019,142 18,678 Accumulated Depreciation (6,176)(6,317) (6,033) ----------- ----------- Properties-Net 12,65412,825 12,645 Investment in Conrail 4,8114,820 4,798 Affiliates and Other Companies 459468 448 Other Long-Term Assets 527526 552 ----------- ----------- Total Assets $ 20,54920,927 $ 20,427 =========== =========== LIABILITIES Current Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 1,1031,116 $ 1,216 Labor and Fringe Benefits Payable 463481 462 Casualty, Environmental and Other Reserves 280278 283 Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt 104112 100 Short-Term Debt 437570 187 Other Current Liabilities 387477 352 ----------- ----------- Total Current Liabilities 2,7743,034 2,600 Casualty, Environmental and Other Reserves 720702 645 Long-Term Debt 6,4766,555 6,432 Deferred Income Taxes 3,1933,180 3,173 Other Long-Term Liabilities 1,544 1,697 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities 14,70715,015 14,547 ----------- ----------- SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY Common Stock, $1 Par Value 217218 217 Other Capital 1,4911,512 1,489 Retained Earnings 4,2554,303 4,294 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (121) (120) ----------- ----------- Total Shareholders' Equity 5,8425,912 5,880 ----------- ----------- Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity $ 20,54920,927 $ 20,427 =========== ===========
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. - 5 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the company's financial position of CSX Corporation and subsidiaries (CSX or the "company") at AprilJuly 2, 1999 and December 25, 1998, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the quarters and six months ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998, such adjustments being of a normal recurring nature. Certain prior-year data have been reclassified to conform to the 1999 presentation. Included in these reclassifications is the restatement of 1998 earnings and cash flow information to present the company's investment in its barge subsidiary under the equity method of accounting. In June 1998, CSX conveyed the subsidiary to a joint venture in which it holds a 32 percent ownership interest. While the company believes that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes included in the company's latest Annual Report and Form 10-K. The company's fiscal year is composed of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Friday in December. Fiscal year 1999 will consistconsists of 53 weeks ending on December 31, 1999. Fiscal year 1998 consisted of 52 weeks ended December 25, 1998. The financial statements presented are for the 14-week quarter13-week quarters ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and June 26, 1998, the 27-week period ended July 2, 1999, the 13-week quarter26-week period ended March 27,June 26, 1998, and as of December 25, 1998. Comprehensive income approximates net earnings for all periods presented in the accompanying consolidated statement of earnings. NOTE 2. CHANGE IN METHOD OF ACCOUNTING FOR INSURANCE-RELATED ASSESSMENTS CSX adopted the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants' Statement of Position No. 97-3, "Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related Assessments," (SOP No. 97-3) effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 1999. SOP No. 97-3 requires companies to accrue assessments related to workers' compensation second injury funds and is applicable to CSX with respect to certain assessments incurred by Sea-Land Service, Inc., the company's container-shipping unit. The assessments relate to employees who have experienced second injuries over periods dating back to the 1970's and are receiving a disability type benefit. Previously, the assessments were charged to expense in the fiscal year they were paid. As a result of adopting SOP No. 97-3, the company recorded a non-cash charge of $78 million, $49 million after-tax, 24 cents per share, during the quarter ended April 2, 1999 to reflect the cumulative effect on prior years of the accounting change. Had the accounting change been applied retroactively, the effect on net earnings and related per share amounts would not have been material to any period presented. NOTE 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE Earnings per share are based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding, as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 128, "Earnings per Share," for the fiscal quarters and six months ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998. Earnings per share, assuming dilution, are based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of potentially dilutive securities, principally employee stock plans. For the fiscal quarters ended April 2, 1999 and March 27, 1998, potentially dilutive common shares totaled 1.5 million and 4.7 million, respectively. - 6 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE, Continued weighted average of common shares outstanding adjusted for the effect of potentially dilutive securities, principally employee stock plans. For the fiscal quarters ended July 2, 1999 and June 26, 1998, potentially dilutive common shares totaled 2.6 million and 4.1 million, respectively. For the six month periods ended July 2, 1999 and June 26, 1998, potentially dilutive shares totaled 2.1 million and 4.4 million respectively. Certain potentially dilutive securities outstanding at AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998 were not included in the computation of earnings per share, assuming dilution, since their exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period and, accordingly, their effect is antidilutive. These shares totaled 11.47.0 million at a weighted-average exercise price of $50.29$50.79 per share at AprilJuly 2, 1999 and 1.963.5 million with ana weighted-average exercise price of $57.00$54.97 per share at March 27,June 26, 1998. Earnings per share for the first quarter of 1998 have been restated to reflect clarification of the treatment of certain stock-based compensation plan shares under Statement No. 128. Earnings per share were revised to 43 cents from 42 cents for first quarter 1998. On a diluted basis, first quarter 1998 earnings per share were revised to 42 cents from 41 cents. NOTE 4. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS The FASB has issued Statement No. 133,137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"Activities Deferral of Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133" which postpones the effective date of FASB Statement No. 133 until fiscal quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. Statement No. 133 requires companies to record derivatives on the statement of financial position, measured at fair value. The statement also sets forth new accounting rules for gains or losses resulting from changes in the values of derivatives. While CSX does not currently use derivative financial instruments, and its historical use of such instruments has not been material, the company plans to adopt this statement in the first quarter of 20002001 to the extent it may apply at that time. The company would not expect the adoption of Statement No. 133 to have a material impact on its financial statements. NOTE 5. JOINT ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF CONRAIL Background - ---------- In May 1997,On June 1, 1999, CSX and Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern) completedformally began integrated operations over their respective portions of the acquisition of Conrail Inc. (Conrail) through a jointly owned entity pursuant to an agreement dated April 8, 1997. Underrail system. This step implements the terms of the agreement, CSX contributed approximately $4.1 billion, in the form of cash and Conrail shares previously acquired, for a 42% economic interest in Conrail. Norfolk Southern contributed approximately $5.7 billion, also in the form of cash and Conrail shares previously acquired, for a 58% economic interest in Conrail.operating plan envisioned by CSX and Norfolk Southern each have a 50% voting interestwhen they completed the joint acquisition of Conrail in Conrail through the jointly owned entity. The Conrail shares acquired by the jointly owned entity were initially held in a voting trust pendingMay 1997 and later received regulatory approval of the transaction by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). On June 23, 1997, CSX and Norfolk Southern filed a joint railroad control application with the STB outlining the terms of their agreement, their respective operating plans, and the benefits expected from combining the respective rail systems. On July 23, 1998, following an extensive review, the STB issued a written decision approving the application with limited conditions. The decision permitted CSX and Norfolk Southernpermitting them to exercise joint control over Conrail onin August 22, 1998. At that time, the voting trust was dissolved and a new Conrail board of directors was elected. Certain steps necessary to integrate the operations of the ConrailThe rail system with thosesubsidiaries of CSX and Norfolk Southern such asoperate their respective portions of the Conrail system pursuant to various operating and equipment agreements which took effect on June 1. Under these agreements, which have terms of 25 years plus extension options, the railroads pay operating fees to Conrail for the use of right-of-way and rent for the use of equipment. Conrail continues to provide rail service in certain shared geographic areas for the joint benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern for which it is compensated on the basis of usage by the respective railroads. CSX and Norfolk Southern, through a jointly-owned acquisition entity, hold economic interests in Conrail of 42% and 58%, respectively, and voting interests of 50% each. - 7 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 5. JOINT ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF CONRAIL , Continued Background, Continued - --------------------- arrangement of labor implementing agreements, could not commence until the August 22, 1998 control date. Those steps and other planning activities are expected to be completed by June 1, 1999, at which time the integration of rail operations will take place. Upon integration, CSX and Norfolk Southern will separately operate designated routes, facilities, and equipment pursuant to various operating agreements with Conrail and its subsidiaries. Certain other Conrail assets will be operated by Conrail for the benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern, or jointly by the two owners. Substantially all of Conrail's customer freight contracts will be assumed by either CSX or Norfolk Southern. The majority of Conrail's operations workforce will be employed by CSX or Norfolk Southern, although certain operations personnel, as well as certain management and administrative employees, will remain at Conrail to oversee its ongoing business activities. As a result of the acquisition, a number of positions will be eliminated and certain duplicate facilities will be closed. Acquisition Accounting by the Jointly Owned Entity and CSX - ---------------------------------------------------------- The jointly owned entity has accounted for the acquisition of Conrail as a purchase business combination effective as of the August 1998 control date. At that time, its investment in Conrail was approximately $10.2 billion, consisting of the original $9.8 billion purchase price plus equity in Conrail's earnings, net of purchase price amortization, since the May 1997 acquisition date. This amount has been allocated to reflect the fair values of Conrail's assets and liabilities as follows (in millions): Current assets $ 911 Property and equipment, net 17,505 Other assets 1,217 Current liabilities (1,279) Long-term debt (1,879) Deferred income taxes (5,585) Other liabilities (690) ---------- Total $10,200$ 10,200 ========== The jointly owned entity's purchase price allocation included a provision of $280 million for the cost to Conrail of separating non-union employees whose positions are beingwere eliminated as a result of the acquisition. CSX has separately recorded liabilities totaling approximately $400 million to provide for other acquisition-related obligations it will beis required to fund, including separation costs for Conrail union employees, relocation costs for Conrail union and non-union employees, and costs associated with the closure of certain Conrail facilities. CSX has increased its investment in Conrail on the statement of financial position as a result of recording these separate obligations. Any costs that may be incurred in separating or relocating CSX employees or closing facilities at CSX will be charged to operating expense when definitive plans are established and communicated. - 8 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 5. JOINT ACQUISITION OF CONRAIL, Continued Acquisition Accounting by the Jointly Owned Entity and CSX, Continued - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Under STB restrictions, CSX and Norfolk Southern did not have complete access to Conrail's properties and records and also were prevented from negotiating labor implementing agreements prior to the August 1998 control date. As a result, the amounts recorded by the jointly owned entity and by CSX for separation costs and other acquisition-related obligations are preliminary and subject to refinement as CSX and Norfolk Southern finalize and implementcomplete their integration plans.of the Conrail network. Any such adjustments are expected to be completed in the third quarter of 1999 and are not expected to have a material effect on CSX's operating results or financial position. - 8 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 5. JOINT ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF CONRAIL, Continued Conrail Financial Information - ----------------------------- Summary financial information for Conrail for its fiscal periods ended March 31,June 30, 1999 and 1998, and at December 31, 1998, is as follows: Quarters Ended ------------------------------ March 31, March 31, 1999 1998 ------------ -------------- Income Statement Information: Revenues $ 916 $ 927 Income from Operations 146 160 Net Income 76 85 As Of -------------------------------- March 31, December 31, 1999 1998 ----------- --------------- Balance Sheet Information: Current Assets $ 1,126 $ 1,005 Property and Equipment and Other Assets 7,987 8,039 Total Assets 9,113 9,044 Current Liabilities 1,210 1,207 Long-Term Debt 1,594 1,609 Total Liabilities 5,236 5,244 Stockholders' Equity 3,877
Quarters Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, -------------------- ---------------------- 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- --------- --------- Income Statement Information: Revenues $737 $983 $1,653 $1,910 Income (Loss) From Operations (61) 206 85 366 Net Income (Loss) (63) 115 13 200
As Of ------------------------------ June 30, December 31, 1999 1998 ------------ -------------- Balance Sheet Information: Current Assets $ 893 $ 1,005 Property and Equipment and Other Assets 7,788 8,039 Total Assets 8,681 9,044 Current Liabilities 1,048 1,207 Long-Term Debt 1,337 1,609 Total Liabilities 4,820 5,244 Stockholders' Equity 3,861 3,800 CSX's Accounting
Conrail's operating results for the Investmentquarter ended June 30, 1999 were significantly impacted by the changes in Conrail - ----------------------------------------------its business resulting from the integration with CSX is using the equity methodand Norfolk Southern. Effective June 1, 1999, Conrail's major sources of accounting for its investment in Conrail through the jointly owned entity. Under the equity method, the company recognizes incomerevenue are derived from its proportionate shareCSX and Norfolk Southern and consist principally of operating fees, equipment rent, and shared area usage fees. The nature of Conrail's net income,operating expenses has also changed to reflect the new operations. In addition, Conrail's operating results included certain non-recurring expenses during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999. These expenses include amounts related to the integration, such as employee training and costs to discontinue certain activities, as well as an adjustment to reflect an increase in a state property tax rate and an increase in casualty reserves based on a recently-completed actuarial valuation. The increase in Conrail's casualty reserves was considered by the effectjoint acquisition entity in its fair value allocation of Conrail's assets and liabilities and, accordingly, was excluded in determining the purchase price allocation on items such as depreciation of property and equipment. Equityequity in Conrail's net income recorded by CSX. CSX's Accounting for Conrail - ---------------------------- Upon integration, substantially all of Conrail's customer freight contracts were assumed by CSX and Norfolk Southern. As a result, beginning June 1, 1999, CSX's rail and intermodal segment operating revenue includes revenue from traffic previously moving on Conrail. Operating expenses reflect corresponding increases for costs incurred to handle the effect ofnew traffic and operate the purchase price allocation,former Conrail lines. Effective June 1, 1999, rail operating expenses also include a new expense category, "Conrail Operating Fee, Rent and acquisition and transition expenses incurred prior to the integration of rail operations are reported as net income (loss) from investment in Conrail and are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of earnings.Services", - 9 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 5. JOINT ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION OF CONRAIL, Continued CSX's Accounting for Conrail, Continued - --------------------------------------- which reflects payments to Conrail for the use of right-of-way and equipment; as well as charges for transportation, switching, and terminal services provided by Conrail in the shared areas operated for the joint benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern. The new expense category also includes purchase price amortization and CSX's proportionate share of Conrail's net income, which continues to be recognized under the equity method of accounting. Prior to the June 1, 1999 integration, CSX recorded its share of Conrail's net income, less purchase price amortization, and acquisition and transition expenses, in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of earnings. NOTE 6. SALE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER-SHIPPING ASSETS On July 21, 1999, CSX entered into an agreement to sell certain assets comprising the international liner business of Sea-Land Service, Inc. (Sea-Land), its wholly-owned container-shipping subsidiary, to A. P. Moller-Maersk Line (Maersk) for $800 million in cash. The transaction is contingent upon receiving regulatory approvals. The sales price is subject to adjustment based on the final amounts of certain assets and related obligations conveyed at closing. The parties currently expect to close the transaction in the fourth quarter of 1999. The international liner business operates approximately 70 container vessels and 200,000 containers in worldwide trades and comprises a majority of CSX's container-shipping revenue. In addition to vessels and containers, Maersk will acquire certain terminal facilities and various other assets and related liabilities of the international liner business, including the assumption of certain lease obligations. Based on preliminary calculations, the book value of the net assets to be conveyed exceeds the sales price. As a result, CSX expects to classify these assets as held for sale and record an impairment loss in the third quarter of 1999 to adjust the book value of the related property, equipment and other long-lived assets to fair value. The impairment loss will be determined and accounted for under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." While the final impairment loss will not be determined until late in the third quarter, management currently expects the loss to exceed $300 million before income taxes. With the recognition of the impairment charge in the third quarter, no significant gain or loss is expected upon the subsequent closing of the transaction. NOTE 7. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE The company sells revolving interests in its rail accounts receivable to public investors through a securitization program and to a financial institution through commercial paper conduit programs. The accounts receivable are sold, without recourse, to a wholly-owned, special-purpose subsidiary, which then transfers the receivables, with recourse, to a master trust. The securitization and conduit programs are accounted for as sales in accordance with FASB Statement No. 125 "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." Receivables sold under these arrangements are excluded from accounts receivable in the consolidated statement of financial position. At AprilJuly 2, 1999, the agreements - 10 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 7. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, Continued provide for the sale of up to $350 million in receivables through the securitization program and $50 million through the conduit programs. At AprilJuly 2, 1999 and December 25, 1998, the company had sold $347 million of accounts receivable; $300 million through the securitization program and $47 million through the conduit programs. The certificates issued under the new securitization program bear interest at 6% annually and mature in June 2003. Receivables sold under the conduit program require yield payments based on prevailing commercial paper rates plus incremental fees. The company's retained interests in the receivables were $566$705 million at AprilJuly 2, 1999 and $482 million at December 25, 1998 and are included in accounts receivable. Losses recognized on the sale of accounts receivable totaled $8 million and $7 million for the quarters ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and March 27,June 26, 1998, respectively.and $15 million for the six month periods ended July 2, 1999 and June 26, 1998. The company has retained the responsibility for servicing accounts receivable transferred to the master trust. The average servicing period is approximately one month. No servicing asset or liability has been recorded since the fees the company receives for servicing the receivables approximate the related costs. NOTE 7.8. OPERATING EXPENSE Quarters Ended -------------------------- April 2, March 27, 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- Labor and Fringe Benefits $ 827 $ 814 Materials, Supplies and Other 621 591 Building and Equipment Rent 307 266 Inland Transportation 257 248 Depreciation 167 153 Fuel 86 112 ----------- ---------- Total $ 2,265 $ 2,184 =========== ========== -10
Quarters Ended Six Months Ended -------------------------- -------------------------- July 2, June 26, July 2, June 26, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------ Labor and Fringe Benefits $ 853 $ 758 $ 1,680 $ 1,572 Materials, Supplies and Other 645 625 1,266 1,216 Conrail Operating Fee, Rent and Services 46 - 46 - Building and Equipment Rent 279 275 586 541 Inland Transportation 259 244 516 492 Depreciation 159 152 326 305 Fuel 101 100 187 212 ----------- ----------- ---------- ------------ Total $ 2,342 $ 2,154 $ 4,607 $ 4,338 =========== =========== ========== ============
- 11 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 8.9. OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Quarters Ended ------------------------- April 2, March 27, 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- Interest Income $ 14 $ 14 Income (Loss) from Real Estate and Resort Operations(1) (7) (5) Net Losses from Accounts Receivable Sold (8) (7) Minority Interest (9) (8) Income (Loss) from Investment in Conrail - Net (28) (6) Equity Earnings of Other Affiliates 7 1 Foreign Currency Gain (Loss) 5 (3) Miscellaneous (9) (15) ----------- ---------- Total $ (35) $ (29) ===========
Quarters Ended Six Months Ended ---------------------- ---------------------- July 2, June 26, July 2, June 26, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Interest Income $ 10 $ 13 $ 24 $ 27 Income from Real Estate and Resort Operations(1) 17 16 10 11 Net Investment Gain 27 - 27 - Net Losses from Accounts Receivable Sold (7) (8) (15) (15) Minority Interest (10) (6) (19) (14) Income (Loss) from Investment in Conrail - Net (14) (5) (42) (11) Equity Earnings of Other Affiliates 7 9 14 10 Foreign Currency Gain (Loss) - (2) 5 (5) Miscellaneous (7) (14) (16) (29) ---------- --------- ---------- --------- Total $ 23 $ 3 $ (12) $ (26) ========== ========= ========== =========
(1) Gross revenue from real estate and resort operations was $19$52 million and $21$71 million for the quartersquarter and six months ended AprilJuly 2, 1999, respectively, and March 27, 1998,$55 million and $76 million for the quarter and six months ended June 26, 1999, respectively. NOTE 9.10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES New Orleans Tank Car Fire - ------------------------- In September 1997, a state court jury in New Orleans, Louisiana returned a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against CSXT.CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), the wholly-owned rail subsidiary of CSX. The award was made in a class action lawsuit against a group of nine companies based on personal injuries alleged to have arisen from a 1987 fire. The fire was caused by a leaking chemical tank car parked on CSXT tracks and resulted in the 36-hour evacuation of a New Orleans neighborhood. In the same case, the court awarded a group of 20 plaintiffs compensatory damages of approximately $2 million against the defendants, including CSXT, to which the jury assigned 15 percent of the responsibility for the incident. CSXT's liability under that compensatory damages award is not material, and adequate provision has been made for the award. In October 1997, the Louisiana Supreme Court set aside the punitive damages judgment, ruling the judgment should not have been entered until all liability issues were resolved. In February 1999, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued a further decision, authorizing and instructing the trial court to enter individual punitive damages judgments in favor of the 20 plaintiffs who had received awards of compensatory damages, in amounts representing an appropriate share of the jury's award. The trial court on April 8, 1999 entered judgment awarding approximately $2 million in compensatory damages and approximately $8.5 million in punitive damages to those 20 plaintiffs. Approximately $6.2 million of the punitive damages awarded were assessed against CSXT. CSXT then filed post-trial motions, for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as to the April 8 judgment. CSXT believes that these recent judicial decisions will expedite the process of full appellate review of the 1997 trial. A trial for the claims of 20 additional plaintiffs for compensatory damages will begin in May 1999. - 1112 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 9.10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, Continued New Orleans Tank Car Fire, Continued - ------------------------------------ A trial for the claims of 20 additional plaintiffs for compensatory damages began on May 24, 1999. In early July, the jury in that trial rendered verdicts of approximately $330,000 in favor of eighteen of those twenty plaintiffs. Two plaintiffs received nothing; that is, the jury found that they had not proved any damages. Management believes that this result, while still excessive, supports CSXT's contention that the $2.5 billion punitive damages award was unwarranted. CSXT is pursuingcontinues to pursue an aggressive legal strategy. Management believes that any adverse outcome will not be material to CSX's or CSXT's overall results of operations or financial position, although it could be material to results of operations in a particular quarterly accounting period. Self-Insurance - -------------- Although the company obtains substantial amounts of commercial insurance for potential losses for third-party liability and property damage, reasonable levels of risk are retained on a self-insurance basis. A portion of the insurance coverage, $25 million limit above $100 million per occurrence from rail and certain other operations, is provided by a company partially owned by CSX. Environmental - ------------- CSXT is a party to various proceedings involving private parties and regulatory agencies related to environmental issues. CSXT has been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at 105108 environmentally impaired sites that are or may be subject to remedial action under the Federal Superfund statute (Superfund) or similar state statutes. A number of these proceedings are based on allegations that CSXT, or its railroad predecessors, sent hazardous substances to the facilities in question for disposal. Such proceedings arising under Superfund or similar state statutes can involve numerous other waste generators and disposal companies and seek to allocate or recover costs associated with site investigation and cleanup, which could be substantial. CSXT is involved in a number of administrative and judicial proceedings and other clean-up efforts at 243246 sites, including the sites addressed under the Federal Superfund statute or similar state statutes, where it is participating in the study and/or clean-up of alleged environmental contamination. The assessment of the required response and remedial costs associated with most sites is extremely complex. Cost estimates are based on information available for each site, financial viability of other PRPs, where available, and existing technology, laws and regulations. CSXT's best estimates of the allocation method and percentage of liability when other PRPs are involved are based on assessments by consultants, agreements among PRPs, or determinations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or other regulatory agencies. At least once each quarter, CSXT reviews its role, if any, with respect to each such location, giving consideration to the nature of CSXT's alleged connection to the location (e.g., generator, owner or operator), the extent of CSXT's alleged connection (e.g., volume of waste sent to the location and other relevant factors), the accuracy and strength of evidence connecting CSXT to the location, and the number, connection and financial position of other named and unnamed PRPs at the location. The ultimate liability for remediation - 13 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, Continued Environmental , Continued - ------------------------- can be difficult to determine with certainty because of the number and creditworthiness of PRPs involved. Through the assessment process, CSXT monitors the creditworthiness of such PRPs in determining ultimate liability. Based upon such reviews and updates of the sites with which it is involved, CSXT has recorded, and reviews at least quarterly for adequacy, reserves to cover estimated contingent future - 12 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES, Continued Environmental , Continued - ------------------------- environmental costs with respect to such sites. The recorded liabilities, for estimated future environmental costs at AprilJuly 2, 1999, and December 25, 1998, were $72$69 million and $75 million, respectively. These recorded liabilities, which are undiscounted, include amounts representing CSXT's estimate of unasserted claims, which CSXT believes to be immaterial. The liability has been accrued for future costs for all sites where the company's obligation is probable and where such costs can be reasonably estimated. The liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites as well as any significant ongoing monitoring costs, but excludes any anticipated insurance recoveries. The majority of the AprilJuly 2, 1999 environmental liability is expected to be paid out over the next five to seven years, funded by cash generated from operations. The company does not currently possess sufficient information to reasonably estimate the amounts of additional liabilities, if any, on some sites until completion of future environmental studies. In addition, latent conditions at any given location could result in exposure, the amount and materiality of which cannot presently be reliably estimated. Based upon information currently available, however, the company believes that its environmental reserves are adequate to accomplish remedial actions to comply with present laws and regulations, and that the ultimate liability for these matters will not materially affect its overall results of operations and financial condition. Other Legal Proceedings - ----------------------- A number of legal actions are pending against CSX and certain subsidiaries in which claims are made in substantial amounts. While the ultimate results of environmental investigations, lawsuits and claims involving the company cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not currently expect that resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the company. NOTE 10.11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS The company operates in four business segments: Rail, Intermodal, Container Shipping and Contract Logistics. The Rail segment provides rail freight transportation over a network of approximately 18,30022,700 route miles in 2023 states in the East, Midwest and South.South; the District of Columbia and two Canadian provinces. The Intermodal segment provides transcontinental intermodal transportation services and operates a network of dedicated intermodal facilities across North America. The Container Shipping segment provides global transportation services via a fleet of 9891 container ships and more than 220,000 containers. The Contract Logistics segment provides customized logistics solutions, including inventory management, distribution, warehousing, assembly and just-in-time delivery. The company's segments are strategic business units that - 14 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS, Continued offer different services and are managed separately based on the differences in these services. Because of their close interrelationship, the Rail and Intermodal segments are also viewed on a combined basis as Surface Transportation operations. - 13 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 10. BUSINESS SEGMENTS, Continued The company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is business segment operating income, defined as income from operations, excluding the effects of special charges and gains. Intersegment sales and transfers are generally accounted for as if the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at current market prices. Quarter ended AprilJuly 2, 1999: - --------------------------
Surface Transportation ------------------------------- Container Contract Rail Intermodal Total Shipping Logistics Totals -------- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Revenues from external $1,334 $199 $1,533 $977 $106 $2,616 customers Intersegment revenues - 8 8 - 11 19 Segment operating income 208 16 224 56 9 289
Quarter ended June 26, 1998: - ---------------------------
Surface Transportation ------------------------------- Container Contract Rail Intermodal Total Shipping Logistics Totals -------- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Revenues from external $1,253 $150 $1,403 $993 $94 $2,490 customers $1,297 $163 $1,460 $973 $108 $2,541 Intersegment revenues - 8 8 - 6 6 - 12 1814 Segment operating income 266289 6 295 52 7 273 12 9 294354
QuarterSix Months ended March 27, 1998:July 2, 1999: - ---------------------------------------------------------
Surface Transportation ------------------------------- Container Contract Rail Intermodal Total Shipping Logistics Totals -------- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Revenues from external $2,631 $362 $2,993 $1,950 $214 $5,157 customers $1,255 $150 $1,405 $955 $102 $2,462 Intersegment revenues - 9 914 14 - 5 1423 37 Segment operating income 264 9 273474 23 497 68 18 583
Six Months ended June 26, 1998: - ------------------------------
Surface Transportation ------------------------------- Container Contract Rail Intermodal Total Shipping Logistics Totals -------- ------------ --------- ---------- --------- ---------- Revenues from external $2,508 $300 $2,808 $1,948 $196 $4,952 customers Intersegment revenues - 17 17 - 11 28 Segment operating income 553 15 7 295568 67 14 649
- 15 - CSX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited), Continued (All Tables in Millions of Dollars, Except Per Share Amounts) NOTE 11. BUSINESS SEGMENTS, Continued A reconciliation of the totals reported for the business segments to the applicable line items in the consolidated financial statements is as follows: 1998 1997 --------- --------
Quarters Ended Six Months Ended ------------------------ --------------------- July 2, June 26, July 2, June 26, 1999 1998 1999 1998 ----------- ----------- --------- ---------- Revenues: - -------- Total external revenues for business segments $ 2,616 $ 2,490 $ 5,157 $ 4,952 Intersegment revenues for business segments 19 14 37 28 Elimination of intersegment revenues (19) (14) (37) (28) ---------- --------- --------- --------- Total consolidated revenues $ 2,616 $ 2,490 $ 5,157 $ 4,952 =========== =========== ========= ========= Operating Income: - ---------------- Total operating income for business segments $ 289 $ 354 $ 583 $ 649 Reclassification of intercompany interest income (16) (15) (31) (31) Unallocated corporate expenses 1 (3) (2) (4) ---------- --------- --------- --------- Total consolidated operating income $ 274 $ 336 $ 550 $ 614 =========== =========== ========= =========
- -------- Total external revenues for business segments $ 2,541 $ 2,462 Intersegment revenues for business segments 18 14 Elimination of intersegment revenues (18) (14) - -- ------- -------- Total consolidated revenues $ 2,541 $ 2,462 ========= ======== Operating Income: - ---------------- Total operating income for business segments $ 294 $ 295 Reclassification of intercompany interest income (15) (16) Unallocated corporate expenses (3) (1) - -- ------- -------- Total consolidated operating income $ 276 $ 278 ========= ======== - 1416 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - --------------------- First Quarter 1999 Compared with 1998 - ------------------------------------- CSX follows a 52/53-week fiscal calendar. Fiscal year 1999 will includeconsists of 53 weeks. The quarterquarters ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 and June 26, 1998 consisted of 13 weeks. The six-month period ended July 2, 1999 consisted of 1427 weeks, comparedwhile the six-month period ended June 26, 1998 consisted of 26 weeks. Second Quarter 1999 Compared with 13 weeks in the prior year's first quarter.1998 - -------------------------------------- The company reported net earnings for the quarter ended AprilJuly 2, 1999 of $75$114 million, 3653 cents per share on a diluted basis, excluding the cumulative effect of a change in accounting.basis. In the prior-year period, the company earned $91$151 million, 42 cents per share on a diluted basis. Effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 1999, CSX adopted AICPA Statement of Position No. 97-3, "Accounting by Insurance and Other Enterprises for Insurance-Related Assessments," which applies to workers compensation second-injury fund assessments at the company's container-shipping unit. As a result of the accounting change, first-quarter 1999 results include a non-cash, cumulative-effect adjustment of $78 million, $49 million after-tax, or 24 cents per share, and reduced net earnings for the quarter to $26 million, 1270 cents per share on a diluted basis. Operating income for the firstsecond quarter of 1999 totaled $276$274 million, compared with $278$336 million in the firstsecond quarter of 1998. Operating revenue of $2.54$2.6 billion was 35 percent higher than the prior-year quarter, while operating expense of $2.27$2.3 billion was 49 percent higher. The higher revenueOperating results for the second quarter and expense were largely attributable tosix months ended July 2, 1999 include a net investment gain of $27 million, $17 million after tax, 8 cents per share, on the additional weeksale of the Grand Teton Lodge Company, a wholly-owned resort subsidiary located in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. CSX received net cash proceeds of $49 million from the 1999 quarter.transaction. Earnings per share for the firstsecond quarter of 1998 have been restated to reflect clarification of the treatment of certain stock-based compensation plan shares under FASB Statement No. 128, "Earnings per Share."128. Earnings per share were revised to 4371 cents from 4269 cents for firstsecond quarter 1998. On a diluted basis, firstsecond quarter 1998 earnings per share were revised to 4270 cents from 4168 cents. Surface Transportation Results - ------------------------------ Rail The company's rail unit produced $266$208 million of operating income in the firstsecond quarter of 1999 versus $264$289 million in 1998. Operating revenue was 36 percent higher, at $1.3 billion, primarily benefiting from the additional week in the quarter, partially offset by lower coal revenue.billion. Operating expense rose 417 percent primarily due to traffic mix and severe winter weather that caused congestion early in the$1.1 billion. The second quarter partially offset by lower fuel costs and a favorable experience credit on medical claims that reduced fringe benefits expense.of 1999 includes one month of integrated Conrail operations, distorting comparisons to 1998. Coal volume declined 27 percent, to 3937.4 million tons, reflecting reduced demand from overseas markets and from electric utilities. As a result, coal revenue fell 410 percent from the 1998 period. Total merchandise traffic and revenue were both 9was 8 percent higher than the prior year quarter, led by significant increaseswith related revenue up 14 percent in automotivethe aggregate. The largest revenue increase was in autos and parts (up 24 percent) due to the new Conrail traffic, strong vehicle sales in 1999, and the strike at major General Motors plants that adversely affected 1998 revenue. Metals revenue increased 16 percent due to the former Conrail traffic and revenue which reflected continued strong demand for vehicles and parts. Other merchandise categories were mixed, with strength in minerals offset by weaknessthe iron ore market. Chemicals revenue was up 14 percent, also benefiting from the integration of former Conrail business, as well as growth in metals and paper and forest products.the plastics industry. Rail operating expense rose 17 percent, primarily due to expenses related to the integration of Conrail operations. - 1517 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, Continued - -------------------------------- Rail, Continued RAIL OPERATING INCOME (Millions of Dollars) -------------------------------------- Quarters Ended -------------------------- April 2, March 27, Percent 1999 1998 Change ----------- ----------- ---------- Operating Revenue Merchandise $ 906 $ 831 9% Coal 353 366 (4)% Other 38 58 (34)% ----------- ----------- ---------- Total 1,297 1,255 3% Operating Expense 1,031 991 4% ----------- ----------- ---------- Operating Income $ 266 $ 264 1% ===========
RAIL OPERATING INCOME (Millions of Dollars) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quarters Ended Six Months Ended ------------------------ ----------------------- July 2, June 26, Percent July 2, June 26, Percent 1999 1998 Change 1999 1998 Change ---------- ----------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------- Operating Revenue Merchandise $ 958 $ 842 14% $ 1,864 $ 1,673 11% Coal 337 373 (10) 690 739 (7) Other 39 38 3 77 96 (20) ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Total 1,334 1,253 6 2,631 2,508 5 Operating Expense 1,126 964 17 2,157 1,955 10 ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Operating Income $ 208 $ 289 (28)% $ 474 $ 553 (14)% ========== =========== ========== ========== Operating Ratio 84.4% 76.9% 82.0% 78.0% ========== =========== ========== ========== Operating Ratio 79.5% 79.0% =========== ===========
Intermodal The company's intermodal unit reported first-quartersecond-quarter operating income of $7$16 million vs. $9versus $6 million a year ago. The declineincrease was primarily due to the integration of Conrail. Strengthening international business lost during last year'sand improved rail service problems in the Western half of the country. CSXI's domestic business (which primarily originates and terminates on CSXT) remained strong.country also benefited the 1999 quarter. Revenue for the quarter totaled $169$207 million versus $159$158 million in the prior-year period, while expenses were 8 percent higher, at $162 million.period. Operating expense totaled $191 million, compared to $152 million in the prior year quarter. The significant revenue and expense increases are almost entirely attributable to the Conrail integration. Container Shipping Unit Results - ------------------------------- Ongoing rate pressuresRate weakness and trade imbalances produced another difficult quarter for the container-shipping unit. Rate weaknesslower traffic volume in the Atlantic and Americas trades was partiallytrade lanes adversely affected container-shipping results for the quarter. However, significant rate increases and improved volume in the Pacific, particularly the Asia-to-U.S. trade, helped offset by improving ratesweaknesses in outbound Asian trades. Trade flows to and from Asia continued to experience significant imbalances.the other trade lanes. Operating income for the firstsecond quarter of 1999 totaled $12$56 million, versus $15$52 million in the 1998 quarter. FirstSecond quarter revenue of $973$977 million was 2 percent higherlower than the prior year quarter, primarily reflecting the extra week in the 1999 quarter. Operating expenses totaled $961$921 million for the quarter, helped by lower fuel prices and reduced volumes.cost reduction efforts. Contract Logistics - ------------------ Operating income at the contract logistics unit was $9 million for the quarter compared to $7 million for the same quarter last year. Revenue of $120$117 million was 1217 percent higher than the prior year quarter, as the unit benefited from the extra week in the 1999 quarter as well as strong growth in managed transportation and warehousing revenue. - 1618 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED First Six Months 1999 Compared with 1998 - ---------------------------------------- For the first six months of the year, earnings for the company totaled $189 million, 89 cents per share on a diluted basis, compared to $242 million, $1.12 per share on a diluted basis for the prior year period. The 1999 results exclude the cumulative effect of an accounting change recorded in the first quarter. As previously mentioned, the 1999 period covers 27 weeks of results, versus 26 weeks for the 1998 period. The additional week in 1999 was included in the first quarter. The year-over-year increases in operating revenue and expense are due largely to the integration of Conrail rail and intermodal operations for one month in 1999, as well as the extra week in the 1999 period. Costs related to preparation and start-up of the Conrail integration adversely affected the 1999 earnings. FINANCIAL CONDITION - ------------------- Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $550$549 million at AprilJuly 2, 1999, ana slight increase of $17 million since December 25, 1998. The primary sources of cash and cash equivalents were normal transportation operations, the issuance of short-term debt and long-term debt.equipment financings. The primary uses of cash were property additions, repayment of long-term debt, and dividend payments. The company reported breakeven cash from operations for the first quarter. Net cash flow from operations is generally weakest in the first quarter of each year and typically reflects lower traffic levels and more difficult operating conditions in the winter months. The company's working capital deficit at AprilJuly 2, 1999 was $676$746 million, reflecting a $60$70 million net use of working capital during the second quarter and a $130 million net use for the first quartersix months of the fiscal year. The higher working capital deficit was principally due to an increase in short-term debt during the first half of 1999, reflecting lower cash flow from operations and the timing of expenditures for property additions. A working capital deficit is not unusual for the company and does not indicate a lack of liquidity. The company continues to maintain adequate current assets to satisfy current liabilities when they are due and has sufficient liquidity and financial resources to manage its day-to-day cash needs. In June 1999, the company issued $250 million of medium-term notes with a one year maturity. The notes were issued under a shelf registration established in 1998 and are classified as short-term debt in the consolidated statement of financial position. Subsequent to quarter end, an additional $150 million in medium term notes were issued, also with a one year maturity. Following this latest issuance, the company has $400 million of capacity remaining under the shelf registration. - 19 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED FINANCIAL DATA - -------------- (Millions of Dollars) ----------------------------- AprilJuly 2, December 25, 1999 1998 -------------- --------------- Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments $ 550549 $ 533 Commercial Paper Outstandingand Equivalents - Short-Term $ 437570 $ 187 Commercial Paper Outstanding - Long-Term $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Working Capital (Deficit) $ (676)(746) $ (616) Current Ratio 0.8 0.8.8 .8 Debt Ratio 52 % 52 % Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 1.41.6 x 1.8 x OUTLOOK - ------- Training and implementation efforts are currentlyAs CSX enters the third quarter of 1999, the company continues to focus on schedule to achieve the planned integration of CSXthe Conrail rail and Conrailintermodal operations. Stabilizing operations on June 1, 1999. Technology systemsand avoiding congestion are currently being tested, and all labor agreements are expected to be in place prior to integration. On its base business,primary goals, as the rail and intermodal units plan for the fall traffic peak and work to ensure customer satisfaction. The rail unit continueswill continue to experience diminished coal traffic. Export coal volumes remain weak, with no recovery expectedanticipated in 1999. The domestic utility coal market is also experiencing weaknessexpected to improve as a result of the mild winterwarm summer weather and fuel substitution.causes coal stockpiles to be depleted. Merchandise traffic remainsshould remain strong, particularly in the automotive category, which continues to benefit from consumer demand and increased production levels at the auto plants. - 17 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED OUTLOOK, Continued - ------------------ CSX's container-shipping unit is being realigned into three distinct businesses with the objectives of lowering costs and enabling the businesses to take full advantage of deregulated global market opportunities. While trade imbalances between Asia and Europe and Asia and the United States are expected toIntermodal volumes should continue to impact shipping operationsbenefit from the recent strengthening in key trade lanes,international traffic. As a result of the Conrail integration, rail and intermodal revenue and expense will be significantly higher for the second half of the year compared to the same period in 1998. CSX anticipates closing the sale of the container-shipping unit's international liner business to A.P. Moller-Maersk Line by year-end. Container-shipping operating results will continue to include the international business until the transaction is finalized. Operating results are expected to improve throughout the balance of the year. Rate increases in the Pacific, particularly the Asia-to-U.S. trade, along with significantproductivity improvements, should more than offset rate increases on eastbound Pacific cargo which will take effectand volume weakness in late May 1999. In the Atlantic and Americas trade lane, rates are being adversely affected by competitive pressure in the recently deregulated environment. CONRAIL ACQUISITIONlanes. - ------------------- CSX/Norfolk Southern Agreement In April 1997, CSX and Norfolk Southern entered into an agreement providing for their joint acquisition of Conrail and the allocation of its routes and other assets. Under the terms of the agreement, CSX and Norfolk Southern acquired all outstanding shares of Conrail not already owned by them for $115 per share in cash during the second quarter of 1997. CSX and Norfolk Southern each possess 50% of the voting and management rights of a jointly owned acquisition company, and non-voting equity is divided between the parties to achieve overall economic allocations of 42% for CSX and 58% for Norfolk Southern. CSX and Norfolk Southern filed an application for control of Conrail with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) in June 1997. On July 23, 1998, following an extensive review, the STB issued a written decision approving the application with limited conditions. The decision permitted CSX and Norfolk Southern to exercise joint control over Conrail on August 22, 1998. At that time, the voting trust holding the Conrail shares was dissolved, and a new Conrail board of directors was elected. The total cost of acquiring the outstanding shares of Conrail under the joint CSX/Norfolk Southern agreement was approximately $9.8 billion. Pursuant to the agreement, CSX has paid 42%, or approximately $4.1 billion, and Norfolk Southern has paid 58%, or approximately $5.7 billion, of such cost. Financing Arrangements CSX initially financed its portion of the Conrail acquisition through a combination of fixed rate notes and commercial paper. The fixed rate notes, issued through a $2.5 billion multitranche offering in May 1997, have maturities ranging from 2002 to 2032 and interest rates ranging from 6.95% to 8.30%. Through mid-1998, commercial paper borrowings supported by a bank credit facility were used to finance approximately $1.7 billion of CSX's investment in Conrail. From May through December 1998, the company replaced approximately $1 billion of the commercial paper borrowings with fixed rate debt. Maturities on the new debt range from 2001 to 2028, and interest rates range from 5.85% to 6.80%. The company currently has approximately $800 million of capacity available under a shelf registration and may replace additional commercial paper borrowings with longer term debt. - 1820 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED CONRAIL ACQUISITION ContinuedAND INTEGRATION - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Background and Integration PlanningOn June 1, 1999, CSX and Norfolk Southern currently expect to implementCorporation (Norfolk Southern) formally began integrated operations with Conrail on June 1, 1999. On that date, the parties will begin operating specifiedover their respective portions of the Conrail routesInc. (Conrail) rail system. This step implements the operating plan envisioned by CSX and other assetsNorfolk Southern when they completed the joint acquisition of Conrail in May 1997 and later received regulatory approval permitting them to exercise joint control over Conrail in August 1998. Under this operating plan, CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), CSX's rail subsidiary, has added approximately 4,400 route miles of track in the Northeastern and Midwestern United States and in Canada to its existing lines concentrated in the Middle Atlantic and Southeastern United States. To service the new operations, approximately 6,200 former Conrail employees have joined CSXT. CSXT now operates a network of more than 22,700 route miles in 23 states, the District of Columbia, and two Canadian provinces and employs approximately 34,500 employees across the combined system. The rail subsidiaries of CSX and Norfolk Southern operate their respective portions of the Conrail system pursuant to various operating agreements. Certainagreements which took effect on June 1. Under these agreements, the railroads pay operating fees to Conrail assets will befor the use of right-of-way and rent for the use of equipment. Conrail continues to provide rail service in certain shared geographic areas for the joint benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern for which it is compensated on the basis of usage by the respective railroads. CSX and Norfolk Southern, through a jointly-owned acquisition entity, hold economic interests in Conrail of 42% and 58%, respectively, and voting interests of 50% each. Financial Effects Upon integration, substantially all of Conrail's customer freight contracts were assumed by CSX and Norfolk Southern. As a result, beginning June 1, 1999, CSX's rail and intermodal operating revenue includes revenue from traffic previously moving on Conrail. Operating expenses reflect corresponding increases for costs incurred to handle the new traffic and operate the former Conrail lines. Effective June 1, 1999, rail operating expenses also include a new expense category, "Conrail Operating Fee, Rent and Services", which reflects payments to Conrail for the use of right-of-way and equipment; as well as charges for transportation, switching, and terminal services provided by Conrail in the shared areas operated for the joint benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern. The company is actively planning for the smooth integration of Conrail operations into its rail system. Plans involve all facets of combining the two systems, including: safety; customer service; train scheduling, switching and routing; equipment utilization and track programs; commuter and passenger rail operations; marketing; technology; labor agreements; and administration. Related capital improvements to certain routes and facilities on the CSX rail system are substantially complete. Preparations leading up to the June 1 implementation date will be concentrated on the completion and testing of technology systems. Labor Agreements CSX has finalized the implementing agreement process with all the organizations that represent Conrail's unionized work force except the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees (BMWE). An implementing agreement with the BMWE was imposed by an arbitrator, but the organization appealed to the STB. CSX then negotiated a settlement with the BMWE that is subject to a ratification vote by the membership. That vote is expected to be completed by early May. Financial Effects Until the integration of rail operations takes place, Conrail will continue to operate as a Class I railroad,new expense category also includes purchase price amortization and CSX's operating results will include 42%proportionate share of Conrail's net income, reportedwhich continues to be recognized under the equity method of accounting, andaccounting. Prior to the June 1, 1999 integration, CSX recorded its share of Conrail's net income, less purchase price amortization, and acquisition and transition expenses in other income (expense) in the expense arising from the allocationconsolidated statement of earnings. Shortly after beginning integrated operations with Conrail, CSX experienced some technology problems and other start-up difficulties that resulted in congestion and delays on parts of the joint purchase pricenew CSX network. Conrail's operations in the shared geographic areas servicing both CSX and Norfolk Southern traffic experienced similar congestion and delays. CSX incurred approximately $40 million of additional costs - 21 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED CONRAIL ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION, Continued - ---------------------------------------------- Financial Effects, Continued during the month of June to Conrail's underlying assetsaddress and liabilities.resolve those problems. In addition, some customers elected to ship some time-sensitive freight via other modes of transportation. Service levels remained below expectation through most of June; however, steady improvement was made throughout the month of July. CSX will continueexpects the entire network to incur interest expense onreflect normal operating conditions and service levels before the debt issued to acquirepeak traffic demand in the Conrail investment. Transition expenses are expected to continue intofall. With the second quartercompletion of 1999, but will decline rapidly once integration is achieved. Upon integration, CSX expects to begin realizing revenue benefits from freight traffic that currently moves on other modes of transportation, principally trucks. CSX also expects to begin realizing cost savings from the elimination of duplicate positions and facilities, as well as other efficiencies created by combining its allocated portion of the Conrail system with its existing rail operations. As CSX and Norfolk Southern move to integrate the Conrail operations, as expected, they will compete for traffic located in markets formerly served solely by Conrail. The company expects that asAs a result of this process of entering new markets, there may behave been changes in the historic rate and traffic patterns, including some rate reductions and traffic volume shifts. The process will beis being driven by market conditions, and the company presently cannot fully assess the impact of these transition effects on either the timing or realization of the projected benefits of the Conrail transaction. - 19 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED CONRAIL ACQUISITION, Continued - ------------------------------ Conrail's Results of Operations Conrail's operating results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999 were significantly impacted by the changes in its business resulting from the integration with CSX and Norfolk Southern. Effective June 1, 1999, Conrail's major sources of revenue derive from CSX and Norfolk Southern and consist principally of operating fees, equipment rent, and shared area usage fees. The nature of Conrail's operating expenses has also changed to reflect the new operations. Conrail reported a net incomeloss of $76$63 million for the firstsecond quarter of 1999, compared with net income of $85$115 million for the prior year quarter. For the related six-month periods, Conrail reported net income of $13 million in 1999 and $200 million in 1998. For the first quarterfive months of 1998. Operating revenues totaled $916 million, a decline of $11 million, or 1 percent,1999, Conrail's operating results from freight linehaul operations in the aggregate reflected modest unfavorable variances when compared with the same period in 1998. Coal and other unit train revenue was down 17%16% from the comparable 1998 quarter, but was partially offset by higherperiod, while automotive and intermodal revenues which reflected increaseswere 7% and 4% higher, respectively, and offset most of 8% and 5%, respectively, over the prior-year quarter.revenue shortfall. Operating expenses totaled $770 million, $3 million higher than the first quarter of 1998. Expensesfor this five-month period were unfavorably impacted by adverse weather conditions early induring the quarter,winter, but benefited from a 20% decline insignificantly lower fuel expense fromprices during the prior year quarter. First quarterearly part of the year. The 1999 expenses were also affected by accruals for property and cargo damage and personal injuries associated with two derailments, and by continued transition spending in preparation for the CSX/Norfolk Southern integration, an adjustment to reflect an increase in a state property tax rate, and an increase in casualty reserves based on a recently-completed actuarial valuation. Conrail expects its operating results for the remainder of rail operations with1999 will reflect a net loss, principally as a result of expenses related to the integration and the phase-out of numerous functions that will not be required after a brief transition and wind-down period. The net loss is not expected to be significant, nor is it expected to affect Conrail's ability to operate its ongoing business activities for the benefit of CSX and Norfolk Southern. Transition spending during the first quarter- 22 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED CONRAIL ACQUISITION AND INTEGRATION, Continued - ---------------------------------------------- Conrail's Results of 1999 consisted primarily of technology integration and employee training costs.Operations, Continued Conrail's working capital deficit was $84$155 million at March 31,June 30, 1999, compared with $202 million at December 31, 1998. TheIn addition to cash flow from operations, the improvement was principally the result of cash provided by operations, which was $170 million for the first quarter of 1999. Thein working capital deficit at quarter-end included $188resulted in part from the reclassification of certain employee obligations. The improvements in working capital were partially offset by the reclassification of approximately $250 million of employee-relatedlong-term debt to current liabilities, principally severance accruals, which are expected to be funded using assets from anreflecting the maturity of the debt in June 2000. Certain components of working capital, such as accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued wages and employee benefits trust and Conrail's overfunded pension plan.were significantly affected by the integration as outstanding balances were collected or paid. Conrail is expected to have sufficient cash flow to meet its ongoing post-integration obligations. SALE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER-SHIPPING ASSETS - ----------------------------------------------- On July 21, 1999, CSX entered into an agreement to sell certain assets comprising the international liner business of Sea-Land Service, Inc. (Sea-Land), its wholly-owned container-shipping subsidiary, to A. P. Moller-Maersk Line (Maersk) for $800 million in cash. The transaction is contingent upon receiving regulatory approvals. The sales price is subject to adjustment based on the final amounts of certain assets and related obligations bothconveyed at closing. The parties currently expect to close the transaction in the fourth quarter of 1999. The international liner business operates approximately 70 container vessels and 200,000 containers in worldwide trades and comprises a majority of CSX's container-shipping revenue. In addition to vessels and containers, Maersk will acquire certain terminal facilities and various other assets and related liabilities of the international liner business, including the assumption of certain lease obligations. Based on preliminary calculations, the book value of the net assets to be conveyed exceeds the sales price. As a result, CSX expects to classify these assets as held for sale and record an impairment loss in the third quarter of 1999 to adjust the book value of the related property, equipment and other long-lived assets to fair value. The impairment loss will be determined and accounted for under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of." While the final impairment loss will not be determined until late in the third quarter, management currently expects the loss to exceed $300 million before and afterincome taxes. With the integrationrecognition of rail operations with CSX and Norfolk Southern. OTHER MATTERS - ------------- Realignmentthe impairment charge in the third quarter, no significant gain or loss is expected upon the subsequent closing of Container-Shipping Businessthe transaction. In March 1999, the companyCSX announced that Sea-Land Service, Inc., its container-shipping unit, willSea-Land's operations would be managed as threere-aligned to comprise separate businesses beginning in mid-1999. Operations will be realigned to comprise anfor international container-shipping, business, an international terminal operations, business, and a domestic container-shipping business.container-shipping. After the sale of the international liner assets to Maersk, Sea-Land will continue to operate the terminal and domestic shipping businesses and will manage them separately. Management reporting and performance measures for the separatethese businesses will be developed and refined during the second half of 1999, and the company expects to revise its segment reporting under FASB Statement No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," in the first quarter of 2000. - 2023 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED OTHER MATTERS Continued - ------------------------------------- Year 2000 Planning State of Year 2000 Readiness - ---------------------------- Technology systems and embedded computer chips that are not Year 2000 ready are unable to distinguish between the calendar year 1900 and the calendar year 2000. CSX recognizes that it must work to minimize the risks that its business operations will be adversely affected by transition to the upcoming calendar year 2000. Accordingly, in 1996, CSX and each of its transportation subsidiaries began a comprehensive plan to address the potential exposure. The company's Year 2000 plan includes the following phases: - - Awareness - General education about the Year 2000 problem. - - Inventory - Cataloging of all systems and business relationships that may be impacted by a Year 2000 date rollover. - - Assessment - Estimating the degree of severity of the Year 2000 problem for cataloged items. - - Remediation - Repair, replacement, or retirement of non-Year 2000 compliant systems. - - Validation - Testing to confirm the compliance of Year 2000 remediated systems. CSX's readiness efforts are focused, first and foremost, on the continued safe operation of its rail and other transportation systems. That includes employee safety, the safety of the general public, and the safety of the environments in which the company operates. Maintaining service continuity both to customers and with vendors before, during, and after the millennium change also is a priority. CSX has material relationships with third parties whose failure to be Year 2000 ready could have adverse impacts on the company's business, operations or financial condition. Third parties CSX considers to be in this category include significant suppliers, large customers and financial institutions. Accordingly, the company has met with or surveyed those parties to assess their Year 2000 readiness and, where applicable, is conducting interface tests with them upon completion of internal testing of remediated applications. Based on the results of those tests, and the information received, follow-up action or contingency plans will be made by the company as it deems appropriate. CSX also is participating in interface tests with other Class I railroads to ensure that electronic data interchanges can be processed in a Year 2000 format. The industry effort has been coordinated by the Association of American Railroads since 1997 and is largely complete, with final work scheduled in the third quarter of 1999. - 2124 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED OTHER MATTERS, Continued - ------------------------ Year 2000 Planning, Continued State of Year 2000 Readiness, Continued - --------------------------------------- Overall, substantial completion of key areas of CSX's Year 2000 readiness plan is expected by the end of the third quarter of 1999. The company's readiness efforts are organized in five areas, which have the following status: Estimated Substantial Effort Completion Current Phase - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Substantial Effort Completion Current Phase - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Core Information Systems Third Quarter 1999 Remediation and Validation Distributed Information Technology Third Quarter 1999 Remediation and Validation Electronic Commerce Third Quarter 1999 Remediation and Validation Non-information Technology (embedded systems) Third Quarter 1999 Remediation and Validation Trading Partners Fourth Quarter 1999 Validation
While CSX estimates that its readiness plan for distributed information technology will be substantially complete by the end of the third quarter, the company does expect that some distributed systems at Sea-Land will not be fully Year 2000 ready until early in the fourth quarter, due in part to the global geographic dispersion of the systems. The anticipated completion schedule for these systems is not expected to adversely affect their ultimate readiness or Sea-Land's current contingency planning efforts. During the second quarter of 1999 Remediationthe integration of Conrail operations was formally implemented and Validation Distributed Information Technology Third Quarter 1999 AssessmentConrail's Year 2000 effort was incorporated into the Year 2000 efforts of CSX and Remediation Electronic Commerce Third Quarter 1999 Remediation and Validation Non-information Technology (embedded systems) Third Quarter 1999 Assessment and Remediation Trading Partners Fourth Quarter 1999 Assessment and ValidationNorfolk Southern. Year 2000 Costs - --------------- The company has incurred total costs of $52$60 million to date related to Year 2000 readiness, which represents approximately 66%76% of the estimated expenditures for the entire plan. To provide a consistent, objective method for identifying costs of the Year 2000 plan, the company classifies expenditures as Year 2000 plan costs for reporting purposes only if they remedy only Year 2000 risks and would otherwise be unnecessary in the normal course of business. The cost of the Year 2000 plan is being expensed as incurred and funded by cash generated from operations. Projections of the remaining cost and completion dates for the Year 2000 plan are based on management's current estimates, which are derived utilizing assumptions of future events, including the continued availability of certain resources, and are inherently uncertain. No major projects have been delayed as a result of Year 2000 readiness efforts, and CSX is periodically assessing its Year 2000 progress with the assistance of outside consultants. In connection with the integration of Conrail, CSX and Norfolk Southern are jointly addressing the Year 2000 readiness of Conrail's core information technology applications and non-information technology embedded systems. Certain of Conrail's operations systems are being made Year 2000 ready as a contingency in the event that there are unexpected delays in the integration or Conrail continues to operate such systems after the integration is completed. Conrail's estimated cost for its Year 2000 plan is approximately $16 million. Contingency Plans - ----------------- Contingency planning is an established and ongoing effort within CSX to address many types of potential operating disruptions which may include Year 2000 issues. For example, detailed emergency operating plans already exist for unanticipated outages of electricity, telecommunications, and other essential services. The company is not in a position to identify or to avoid all possible Year 2000 scenarios or to estimate their overall business impacts. However, the company is currently assessing possible problems and making plans to mitigate the impacts. - 2225 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED OTHER MATTERS, Continued - ------------------------ Year 2000 Planning, Continued Contingency Plans, Continued - ---------------------------- 2000 scenarios or to estimate their overall business impacts. However, the company is currently assessing possible problems and making plans to mitigate the impacts. These plans may include identifying alternate suppliers, vendors, procedures and operational sites; generating equipment lists; conducting staff training; and developing communication plans. CSX defines three primary types of most reasonably likely worst-case scenarios, and anticipates that detailed contingency measures will include the following: - - Systemwide failures -- In the event of complete or nearly complete loss of key assets or services throughout the entire CSX system, CSX will conduct and maintain a safe and orderly shutdown of all operations that depend on those systems. - - Geographically isolated failures -- In the event of complete or nearly complete loss of key assets or services throughout a region, CSX may employ manual fallback plans for non-transportation functions and may maintain a safe and orderly shutdown of affected transportation operations. For Sea-Land, overseas port operations represent a higher Year 2000 risk, since preparedness of providers in some foreign countries is believed to lag that in the United States. Sea-Land may minimize its exposure to high-risk ports, for instance, by temporarily modifying its vessel schedules. - - Movable asset failures -- In the event of a Year 2000 failure of a transportation asset, such as a ship or locomotive that does not have redundant systems for operation, CSX may temporarily remove the asset from service and scale its operations accordingly. Risks - ----- CSX believes that its Year 2000 planning efforts are adequate to address all major risks. There can be no assurance, however, that the company's systems or equipment, or those of third parties on which CSX relies, will be Year 2000 ready in a timely manner or that the company's or third parties' contingency plans will mitigate the effects of the transition to the calendar Year 2000. The failure of the systems or equipment of CSX or third parties (which the company believes is the most reasonably likely worst case scenario) could result in the reduction or suspension of the company's operations and could have a material adverse effect on the company's results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. - 23 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED Litigation In September 1997, a state court jury in New Orleans, Louisiana returned a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against CSXT. The award was made in a class action lawsuit against a group of nine companies based on personal injuries alleged to have arisen from a 1987 fire. The fire was caused by a leaking chemical tank car parked on CSXT tracks and resulted in the 36-hour evacuation of a New Orleans neighborhood. In the same case, the court awarded a group of 20 plaintiffs compensatory damages of approximately $2 million against the defendants, including CSXT, to which the jury assigned 15 percent of the responsibility for the incident. CSXT's liability under that compensatory damages award is not material, and adequate provision has been made for the award. - 26 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED OTHER MATTERS, Continued - ------------------------ Litigation , Continued In October 1997, the Louisiana Supreme Court set aside the punitive damages judgment, ruling the judgment should not have been entered until all liability issues were resolved. In February 1999, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued a further decision, authorizing and instructing the trial court to enter individual punitive damages judgments in favor of the 20 plaintiffs who had received awards of compensatory damages, in amounts representing an appropriate share of the jury's award. The trial court on April 8, 1999 entered judgment awarding approximately $2 million in compensatory damages and approximately $8.5 million in punitive damages to those 20 plaintiffs. Approximately $6.2 million of the punitive damages awarded were assessed against CSXT. CSXT then filed post-trial motions, for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, as to the April 8 judgment. CSXT believes that these recent judicial decisions will expedite the process of full appellate review of the 1997 trial. A trial for the claims of 20 additional plaintiffs for compensatory damages will beginbegan on May 24, 1999. In early July, the jury in May 1999.that trial rendered verdicts of approximately $330,000 in favor of eighteen of those twenty plaintiffs. Two plaintiffs received nothing; that is, the jury found that they had not proved any damages. Management believes that this result, while still excessive, supports CSXT's contention that the $2.5 billion punitive damages award was unwarranted. CSXT is pursuingcontinues to pursue an aggressive legal strategy. Management believes that any adverse outcome will not be material to CSX's or CSXT's overall results of operations or financial position, although it could be material to results of operations in a particular quarterly accounting period. -------------------------------------------------- - 2427 - ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION, CONTINUED Estimates and forecasts in Management's Discussion and Analysis and in other sections of this Quarterly Report are based on many assumptions about complex economic and operating factors with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters that cannot be predicted accurately and that are subject to contingencies over which the company has no control. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs, and projections expressed in such statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "project", and similar expressions signify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the company. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (i) cost savings expected from the integration of Conrail may not be fully realized or realized within the time frame anticipated, (ii) revenues following the integration of Conrail may be lower than expected, (iii) costs or difficulties related to the integration of Conrail may be greater than expected, (iv) general economic or business conditions, either nationally or internationally, including the continuing Asian financial decline, an increase in fuel prices, a tightening of the labor market or changes in demands of organized labor resulting in higher wages, or increased benefits or other costs or disruption of operations may adversely affect the businesses of the company, (v) legislative or regulatory changes, including possible enactment of initiatives to re-regulate the rail industry, may adversely affect the businesses of the company, (vi) changes may occur in the securities markets, and (vii) disruptions of the operations of the company or any other governmental or private entity may occur as a result of issues related to the Year 2000. For additional factors, please refer to the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 1998. - 2528 - PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders (a) Annual meeting held April 27, 1999. (b) Not applicable. (c) There were 217,319,374 shares of CSX common stock outstanding as of February 26, 1999, the record date for the 1999 annual meeting of shareholders. A total of 183,047,348 shares were voted. All of the nominees for directors of the corporation were elected with the following vote: Votes Broker Nominee Votes For Withheld Non-Votes ------- ---------- -------- --------- Elizabeth E. Bailey 180,623,727 2,423,621 -- H. Furlong Baldwin 180,562,198 2,485,150 -- Claude S. Brinegar 176,993,435 6,053,913 -- Robert L. Burrus, Jr. 180,593,878 2,453,470 -- Bruce C. Gottwald 180,565,031 2,482,317 -- John R. Hall 177,104,817 5,942,531 -- E. Bradley Jones 176,417,630 6,629,718 -- Robert D. Kunisch 180,627,916 2,419,432 -- James W. McGlothlin 175,450,263 7,597,085 -- Southwood J. Morcott 180,664,310 2,383,038 -- Charles E. Rice 180,494,464 2,552,884 -- William C. Richardson 180,641,606 2,405,742 -- Frank S. Royal 180,542,348 2,523,000 -- John W. Snow 180,257,028 2,790,320 -- The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit and report on CSX's financial statements for the year 1999 was ratified by the shareholders with the following vote: Votes Broker Votes For Against Abstentions Non-Votes --------- ------- ----------- --------- 181,711,351 879,584 456,413 -- The shareholder proposal regarding the Shareholder Rights Plan was not presented at the meeting, and, therefore, no action was taken. (d) Not applicable. - 29 - PART II. OTHER INFORMATION, Continued Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits 1. (27.1)(27) Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K 1. NoneA report was filed on May 11, 1999, reporting Item 5, Other Events - authorization of issuance and sale of up to U.S. $400,000,000 of Medium-Term Notes, Series C; plus Item 7, Financial Statements and Exhibits - documents related to the notes filed as exhibits. 2. A report was filed on June 11, 1999, reporting Item 5, Other Events - announcement of the integrated operations of CSX Corporation and Norfolk Southern Corporation of their respective portions of the Conrail Inc. rail system; plus Item 7, Financial Statements and Exhibits - (1) Amendment No. 1 dated August 22, 1998 and Amendment No. 2 dated June 1, 1999 to the Transaction Agreement dated June 10, 1997 by and among the company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Conrail Inc., Consolidated Rail Corporation and CRR Holdings LLC and; (2) Operating Agreement dated June 1, 1999 by and between New York Central Lines, LLC and CSX Transportation, Inc. and; (3) Shared Assets Area Operating Agreements for North Jersey, South Jersey/Philadelphia, and Detroit dated June 1, 1999 by and among Consolidated Rail Corporation, CSX Transportation, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company and; (4) Monongahela Usage Agreement dated June 1, 1999 by and among CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Pennsylvania Lines LLC, and New York Central Lines LLC and; (5) a press release by the company dated June 1, 1999. Signature Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. CSX CORPORATION (Registrant) By: \s\/s/ JAMES L. ROSS ----------------------------------- James L. Ross Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) Dated: May 4,August 6, 1999 - 2630 -