Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 20172019
Or
 
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 000-10436
L.B. Foster Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania25-1324733
(State of Incorporation)
(I. R. S. Employer
Identification No.)

415 Holiday Drive, Suite 100, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania15220
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(412) 928-3400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01FSTRNASDAQ Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes ☒   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes ☒    No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No 
Indicate the number
As of October 23, 2019, there were 10,579,259 shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes ofregistrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date.par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.




ClassOutstanding as of October 31, 2017
Common Stock, Par Value $0.0110,340,576 Shares

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
 
Page
Page





Table of Contents
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$15,374  $10,282  
Accounts receivable - net (Note 5)85,039  86,123  
Inventories - net (Note 6)128,741  124,504  
Other current assets6,326  5,763  
Total current assets235,480  226,672  
Property, plant, and equipment - net (Note 7)82,793  86,857  
Operating lease right-of-use assets - net (Note 8)13,234  —  
Other assets:
Goodwill (Note 4)18,930  19,258  
Other intangibles - net (Note 4)44,555  49,836  
Other assets1,295  626  
TOTAL ASSETS$396,287  $383,249  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$73,246  $78,269  
Deferred revenue8,710  6,619  
Accrued payroll and employee benefits12,407  12,993  
Accrued warranty (Note 14)1,222  2,057  
Current portion of accrued settlement (Note 14)8,000  10,000  
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 9)2,978  629  
Other accrued liabilities14,153  13,624  
Total current liabilities120,716  124,191  
Long-term debt (Note 9)70,021  74,353  
Deferred tax liabilities (Note 15)4,668  5,287  
Long-term portion of accrued settlement (Note 14)36,000  40,000  
Long-term operating lease liabilities (Note 8)10,103  —  
Other long-term liabilities16,104  17,299  
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 10,420,635 and 10,366,007, respectively111  111  
Paid-in capital49,014  48,040  
Retained earnings131,275  114,324  
Treasury stock - at cost, 695,144 and 749,772 common stock shares at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively(16,829) (18,165) 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(24,896) (22,191) 
Total stockholders' equity138,675  122,119  
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY$396,287  $383,249  
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
  (Unaudited)  
ASSETS    
Current assets:    
Cash and cash equivalents $35,008
 $30,363
Accounts receivable - net 79,324
 66,632
Inventories - net 104,035
 83,243
Prepaid income tax 1,048
 14,166
Other current assets 9,986
 5,200
Total current assets 229,401
 199,604
Property, plant, and equipment - net 98,536
 103,973
Other assets:    
Goodwill 19,699
 18,932
Other intangibles - net 59,135
 63,519
Investments 151
 4,031
Other assets 2,242
 2,964
Total assets $409,164
 $393,023
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY    
Current liabilities:    
Accounts payable $59,825
 $37,744
Deferred revenue 11,038
 7,597
Accrued payroll and employee benefits 10,353
 7,497
Accrued warranty 9,614
 10,154
Current maturities of long-term debt 9,887
 10,386
Other accrued liabilities 8,452
 8,953
Total current liabilities 109,169
 82,331
Long-term debt 128,398
 149,179
Deferred tax liabilities 11,044
 11,371
Other long-term liabilities 16,734
 16,891
Stockholders' equity:    
Common stock, par value $0.01, authorized 20,000,000 shares; shares issued at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 11,115,779; shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 10,340,576 and 10,312,625, respectively 111
 111
Paid-in capital 44,423
 44,098
Retained earnings 137,492
 133,667
Treasury stock - at cost, common stock, shares at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 775,203 and 803,154, respectively (18,662) (19,336)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (19,545) (25,289)
Total stockholders' equity 143,819
 133,251
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $409,164
 $393,023


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


3

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Sales of goods$119,256  $120,272  $392,566  $339,176  
Sales of services35,020  46,822  113,112  123,262  
Total net sales154,276  167,094  505,678  462,438  
Cost of goods sold97,663  99,045  322,432  279,478  
Cost of services sold28,921  36,746  89,264  96,402  
Total cost of sales126,584  135,791  411,696  375,880  
Gross profit27,692  31,303  93,982  86,558  
Selling and administrative expenses22,264  21,662  67,036  65,488  
Amortization expense1,655  1,762  5,046  5,322  
Interest expense - net1,079  1,296  4,031  4,813  
Other (income) expense - net(421) 157  (823) (320) 
Total expenses24,577  24,877  75,290  75,303  
Income before income taxes3,115  6,426  18,692  11,255  
Income tax expense51  18  2,374  1,271  
Net income$3,064  $6,408  $16,318  $9,984  
Basic earnings per common share$0.29  $0.62  $1.57  $0.96  
Diluted earnings per common share$0.29  $0.61  $1.53  $0.95  
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Sales of goods $103,058
 $100,293
 $318,414
 $326,278
Sales of services 28,434
 14,351
 76,640
 50,670
Total net sales 131,492
 114,644
 395,054
 376,948
Cost of goods sold 82,460
 81,674
 256,152
 260,705
Cost of services sold 22,667
 13,167
 63,549
 44,667
Total cost of sales 105,127
 94,841
 319,701
 305,372
Gross profit 26,365
 19,803
 75,353
 71,576
Selling and administrative expenses 20,218
 19,807
 60,023
 65,941
Amortization expense 1,764
 1,763
 5,218
 7,818
Asset impairments 
 6,946
 
 135,884
Interest expense 2,026
 1,520
 6,315
 4,342
Interest income (56) (50) (166) (157)
Equity in (income) loss of nonconsolidated investments (50) 263
 5
 946
Other income (551) (1,085) (564) (263)
  23,351
 29,164
 70,831
 214,511
Income (loss) before income taxes 3,014
 (9,361) 4,522
 (142,935)
Income tax (benefit) expense (208) (3,379) 698
 (42,125)
Net income (loss) $3,222
 $(5,982) $3,824
 $(100,810)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $0.31
 $(0.58) $0.37
 $(9.82)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $0.31
 $(0.58) $0.37
 $(9.82)
Dividends paid per common share $
 $0.04
 $
 $0.12

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


4

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  (Unaudited) (Unaudited)
Net income (loss) $3,222
 $(5,982) $3,824
 $(100,810)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:        
Foreign currency translation adjustment 2,412
 (1,431) 5,528
 (3,438)
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0, $88 and $0, ($815) 82
 137
 (119) (1,286)
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $0, $38 and $0, $115* 114
 73
 335
 223
Other comprehensive income (loss) 2,608
 (1,221) 5,744
 (4,501)
Comprehensive income (loss) $5,830
 $(7,203) $9,568
 $(105,311)
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Net income$3,064  $6,408  $16,318  $9,984  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment(1,416) (371) (1,038) (3,132) 
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax expense of $0 for all periods(151) 207  (1,309) 1,243  
Reclassification of pension liability adjustments to earnings, net of tax expense of $0 for all periods*90  137  275  392  
Other comprehensive loss(1,477) (27) (2,072) (1,497) 
Comprehensive income$1,587  $6,381  $14,246  $8,487  
 
*Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for pension obligations are charged to selling and administrative expense.expenses.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016
  (Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:    
Net income (loss) $3,824
 $(100,810)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided (used) by operating activities:    
Deferred income taxes (648) (39,690)
Depreciation 9,705
 10,620
Amortization 5,218
 7,818
Asset impairments 
 135,884
Equity loss of nonconsolidated investments 5
 946
(Gain) loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment (347) 209
Share-based compensation 1,228
 875
Income tax deficiency from share-based compensation 
 124
Change in operating assets and liabilities    
Accounts receivable (11,899) 13,491
Inventories (19,336) 3,188
Other current assets (786) (379)
Prepaid income tax 12,569
 (6,436)
Other noncurrent assets 719
 117
Accounts payable 22,017
 (13,256)
Deferred revenue 3,339
 866
Accrued payroll and employee benefits 2,734
 (2,294)
Other current liabilities (763) 956
Other liabilities (63) (353)
Net cash provided by operating activities 27,516
 11,876
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:    
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment 1,388
 923
Capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment (5,335) (6,507)
Loans and capital contributions to equity method investment 
 (635)
Net cash used by investing activities (3,947) (6,219)

L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
20192018
 2017 2016
 (Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net incomeNet income$16,318  $9,984  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income taxesDeferred income taxes(541) (1,477) 
DepreciationDepreciation8,295  8,685  
AmortizationAmortization5,046  5,322  
Equity in (income) loss of nonconsolidated investmentsEquity in (income) loss of nonconsolidated investments(29)  
(Gain) loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment(Gain) loss on sales and disposals of property, plant, and equipment(4) 498  
Stock-based compensationStock-based compensation2,910  2,838  
Change in operating assets and liabilities:Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivableAccounts receivable910  (10,634) 
InventoriesInventories(4,957) (12,960) 
Other current assetsOther current assets480  (1,160) 
Prepaid income taxPrepaid income tax(4,042) (3,025) 
Other noncurrent assetsOther noncurrent assets(425) 1,132  
Accounts payableAccounts payable(4,193) 19,604  
Deferred revenueDeferred revenue2,143  2,278  
Accrued payroll and employee benefitsAccrued payroll and employee benefits(574) (778) 
Accrued settlementAccrued settlement(6,000) —  
Other current liabilitiesOther current liabilities(1,041) 2,287  
Other long-term liabilitiesOther long-term liabilities(1,013) (176) 
Net cash provided by operating activitiesNet cash provided by operating activities13,283  22,425  
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipmentProceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment253  2,267  
Capital expenditures on property, plant, and equipmentCapital expenditures on property, plant, and equipment(5,037) (3,196) 
Proceeds from sale of equity method investmentProceeds from sale of equity method investment—  3,875  
Repayment of revolving line of credit from equity method investmentRepayment of revolving line of credit from equity method investment—  1,235  
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activitiesNet cash (used in) provided by investing activities(4,784) 4,181  
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments of debt (113,119) (134,200)Repayments of debt(156,944) (153,089) 
Proceeds from debt 91,838
 101,075
Proceeds from debt154,961  99,592  
Financing fees 
 (712)
Debt issuance costsDebt issuance costs(836) —  
Treasury stock acquisitions (103) (265)Treasury stock acquisitions(600) (316) 
Cash dividends on common stock paid to shareholders 
 (1,244)
Income tax deficiency from share-based compensation 
 (124)
Net cash used by financing activities (21,384) (35,470)
Net cash used in financing activitiesNet cash used in financing activities(3,419) (53,813) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2,460
 152
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents12  (885) 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 4,645
 (29,661)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents5,092  (28,092) 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 30,363
 33,312
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period10,282  37,678  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $35,008
 $3,651
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$15,374  $9,586  
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid $5,599
 $3,485
Interest paid$3,599  $4,468  
Income taxes (received) paid $(11,233) $3,991
Income taxes paidIncome taxes paid$6,176  $4,077  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2019  
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance, June 30, 2019$111  $48,159  $128,211  $(16,841) $(23,419) $136,221  
Net income—  —  3,064  —  —  3,064  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Pension liability adjustment—  —  —  —  90  90  
Foreign currency translation adjustment—  —  —  —  (1,416) (1,416) 
Unrealized derivative loss on cash flow hedges—  —  —  —  (151) (151) 
Issuance of 543 common shares, net of shares withheld for taxes—  (21) —  12  —  (9) 
Stock-based compensation—  876  —  —  —  876  
Balance, September 30, 2019$111  $49,014  $131,275  $(16,829) $(24,896) $138,675  

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance, June 30, 2018$111  $46,129  $149,068  $(18,180) $(19,237) $157,891  
Net income—  —  6,408  —  —  6,408  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Pension liability adjustment—  —  —  —  137  137  
Foreign currency translation adjustment—  —  —  —  (371) (371) 
Unrealized derivative gain on cash flow hedges—  —  —  —  207  207  
Issuance of 662 common shares, net of shares withheld for taxes—  (21) —  15  —  (6) 
Stock-based compensation—  934  —  —  —  934  
Balance, September 30, 2018$111  $47,042  $155,476  $(18,165) $(19,264) $165,200  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019  
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2018$111  $48,040  $114,324  $(18,165) $(22,191) $122,119  
Adjustment to adopt ASU 2018-02—  —  633  —  (633) —  
Net income—  —  16,318  —  —  16,318  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Pension liability adjustment—  —  —  —  275  275  
Foreign currency translation adjustment—  —  —  —  (1,038) (1,038) 
Unrealized derivative loss on cash flow hedges—  —  —  —  (1,309) (1,309) 
Issuance of 54,628 common shares, net of shares withheld for taxes—  (1,936) —  1,336  —  (600) 
Stock-based compensation—  2,910  —  —  —  2,910  
Balance, September 30, 2019$111  $49,014  $131,275  $(16,829) $(24,896) $138,675  


Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2017$111  $45,017  $145,797  $(18,662) $(17,767) $154,496  
Adjustment to adopt ASU 2016-16—  —  (305) —  —  (305) 
Net income—  —  9,984  —  —  9,984  
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
Pension liability adjustment—  —  —  —  392  392  
Foreign currency translation adjustment—  —  —  —  (3,132) (3,132) 
Unrealized derivative gain on cash flow hedges—  —  —  —  1,243  1,243  
Issuance of 25,431 common shares, net of shares withheld for taxes—  (813) —  497  —  (316) 
Stock-based compensation—  2,838  —  —  —  2,838  
Balance, September 30, 2018$111  $47,042  $155,476  $(18,165) $(19,264) $165,200  


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
8

Table of Contents
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Note 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFinancial Statements
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all estimates and adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)accruals, unless otherwise stated herein) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of L.B. Foster Company and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, and its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, have been included. However, actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.2019. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 20162018 was derived from audited financial statements. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the L.B. Foster Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer collectively to L.B. Foster Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

Assets Held for Sale
The Company classifies assets as held for sale when management approves and commits to a formal plan of sale with the expectation the sale will be completed within one year.  The net assets of the business held for sale are then recorded at the lower of their current carrying value or the fair market value, less costs to sell.  See Note 7 Investments of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.


Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014,August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”2018-15”). The ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transferrequires capitalization of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue, cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized fromcertain implementation costs incurred to obtain or fulfillin a cloud computing arrangement that qualifies as a service contract. The amendments in the ASU 2014-09 isare effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including2019 and for interim periods within that reporting period.therein with early adoption permitted. The Company continuesis currently evaluating the potential impact of the ASU on its project adoption planconsolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). The ASU added a new impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The CECL model applies to trade receivables, other receivables, and most debt instruments. The CECL model does not have a minimum threshold for recognition of impairment losses, and entities will need to measure expected credit losses on assets that have a low risk of loss. This guidance is required to be adopted by performing a detailed evaluationthe Company beginning in fiscal year 2020. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of contracts and sales orders with customers and assessing the impact that this standard will havethese changes on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows,consolidated financial position,statements, including accounting policies, processes, and backlog. We have also been assessing the impact to internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure requirements. We regularly brief our Audit Committee on our overall project plan as well as our progress towards adoption. The Company will adopt this standard as of January 1, 2018 and anticipates using the modified retrospective approach at adoption as it relates to ASU 2014-09.systems.


Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). The new accounting requirements include the accounting for, presentation of, and classification of leases. The guidance will resultresulted in most leases being capitalized as a right of useright-of-use asset with a related liability on our balance sheets.sheet liability. The requirements of the new standard are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is inadopted the process of analyzing the impactprovisions of ASU 2016-02 on our financial position.January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective approach as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, the Company has elected to apply the practical expedients for leases that commenced prior to the effective date, not to apply the recognition requirements in the standard to short-term leases, and not to separate non-lease components from lease components. The Company has a significant number of operating leases, and, as a result, expects this guidance to have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company does not anticipate early adoption as it relates topresented the disclosures required by ASU 2016-02.2016-02 in Note 8.


In October 2016,February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16,2018-02, “Income TaxesStatementIntra-Entity TransfersReporting Comprehensive Income; Reclassification of AssetsCertain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Than Inventory (Topic 740),”Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2016-16”2018-02”), which allows companies to reclassify stranded tax effects caused by the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) which will require an entityfrom accumulated other comprehensive income to recognizeretained earnings. The amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act and improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax consequenceseffects of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. The ASU is effective on January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company continues to evaluateTax Act, the impact this standard will have on the Company’s financial statements but believes there will not be a material change once adopted. The Company will not elect early adoption of ASU 2016-16.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715),” (“ASU 2017-07”) which improves the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. Theunderlying guidance that requires that the entity reporteffect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The Company adopted ASU 2018-02 during the service cost componentfirst quarter of 2019 and has chosen to record the reclassification as of the beginning of the period of adoption. As a result of adopting this standard, we reclassified stranded tax effects of $633 from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” to “Retained earnings.”

The SEC Disclosure Update and Simplification release announces the SEC's adoption of certain amendments in August 2018. While most of the amendments eliminate outdated or duplicative disclosure requirements, the final rule amends the interim financial
9

Table of Contents
statement requirements to require a reconciliation of changes in stockholders’ equity in the same line itemnotes to the financial statements or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered bya separate statement. This analysis should reconcile the pertinent employees duringbeginning balance to the ending balance of each caption in stockholders’ equity for each period for which an income statement is required to be filed and reportcomply with the other componentsremaining content requirements of net periodic pension costRule 3-04 of Regulation S-X. As a result, registrants are required to provide the reconciliation for both the comparable quarterly and net

periodic postretirement benefit costyear-to-date periods in their Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q but only for the year-to-date periods in registration statements, beginning in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotalfirst quarter of income from operations. Of the components of net periodic benefit cost, only the service cost component will be eligible for asset capitalization. The new standard will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods.2019. The Company is evaluating its implementation approach and assessinghas included the impactreconciliation of ASU 2017-07 on the presentation of operations.changes in stockholders’ equity as a separate statement.
Note 2. BUSINESS SEGMENTSBusiness Segments
The Company is a leading manufacturer and distributor of products and services for transportation and energy infrastructure with locations in North America and Europe. The Company is organized and evaluated by product group, which isoperates in 3 different operating segments: the basis for identifying reportable segments. EachRail Products and Services segment, represents a revenue-producing componentthe Construction Products segment, and the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The segments represent components of the Company (a) that engage in activities from which revenue is generated and expenses are incurred; (b) whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), who makes decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments, and (c) for which separatediscrete financial information is produced internally that is subject to evaluation by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources. Each segment isavailable. Operating segments are evaluated based upon itson their segment profit contribution to the Company’sCompany's consolidated results. Other income and expenses, interest, income taxes, and certain other items are managed on a consolidated basis. The Company's segment accounting policies are the same as those described in Note 2. Business Segments of the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements contained in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2018.


The following table illustrates the Company's revenues and profits (losses)profit from operations of the Company by segment for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Net SalesSegment ProfitNet SalesSegment Profit
Rail Products and Services$67,741  $3,417  $84,517  $5,299  
Construction Products47,175  1,848  41,534  1,603  
Tubular and Energy Services39,360  2,230  41,043  4,274  
Total$154,276  $7,495  $167,094  $11,176  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
Net SalesSegment ProfitNet SalesSegment Profit
Rail Products and Services$244,836  $14,815  $238,571  $12,655  
Construction Products139,926  6,095  112,641  4,478  
Tubular and Energy Services120,916  11,937  111,226  10,704  
Total$505,678  $32,847  $462,438  $27,837  
  Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017
  Net Sales Segment Profit Net Sales Segment Profit
Rail Products and Services $62,095
 $3,472
 $187,922
 $8,938
Construction Products 39,118
 3,387
 121,905
 9,156
Tubular and Energy Services 30,279
 2,298
 85,227
 1,774
Total $131,492
 $9,157
 $395,054
 $19,868
  Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016
  Net Sales Segment Profit (Loss) Net Sales Segment Profit (Loss)
Rail Products and Services $56,891
 $(2,047) $188,686
 $(26,474)
Construction Products 34,870
 1,356
 107,098
 5,748
Tubular and Energy Services 22,883
 (6,966) 81,164
 (111,876)
Total $114,644
 $(7,657) $376,948
 $(132,602)


Segment profit (loss) from operations, as shown above, include internal cost of capital charges for assets used inincludes allocated corporate operating expenses. Operating expenses related to corporate headquarter functions that directly support the segment at a rateactivity are allocated based on segment headcount, revenue contribution, or activity of generally 1% per month. There has been no change in the measurement of segment profit (loss)business units within the segments, based on the corporate activity type provided to the segment. The expense allocation excludes certain corporate costs that are separately managed from operations since December 31, 2016. The internal cost of capital charges are eliminated during the consolidation process.segments.


The following table provides a reconciliation of reportable segment net profit (loss) from operations to the Company’s consolidated total:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Profit for reportable segments$7,495  $11,176  $32,847  $27,837  
Interest expense - net(1,079) (1,296) (4,031) (4,813) 
Other income (expense) - net421  (157) 823  320  
Unallocated corporate expenses and other unallocated charges(3,722) (3,297) (10,947) (12,089) 
Income before income taxes$3,115  $6,426  $18,692  $11,255  






10

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Profit (loss) for reportable segments $9,157
 $(7,657) $19,868
 $(132,602)
Interest expense (2,026) (1,520) (6,315) (4,342)
Interest income 56
 50
 166
 157
Other income 551
 1,085
 564
 263
LIFO (expense) income (1,552) 917
 (1,733) 1,442
Equity in income (loss) of nonconsolidated investments 50
 (263) (5) (946)
Corporate expense, cost of capital elimination, and other unallocated charges (3,222) (1,973) (8,023) (6,907)
Income (loss) before income taxes $3,014
 $(9,361) $4,522
 $(142,935)
Table of Contents

The following table illustrates assets of the Company by segment:
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
Rail Products and Services$181,694  $175,704  
Construction Products99,997  97,133  
Tubular and Energy Services86,531  90,402  
Unallocated corporate assets28,065  20,010  
Total$396,287  $383,249  

Note 3. Revenue
Revenue from products or services provided to customers over time accounted for 33.4% and 26.8% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and 28.1% and 25.2% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Revenue under these long-term agreements is generally recognized over time either using an input measure based upon the proportion of actual costs incurred to estimated total project costs or an input measure based upon actual labor costs as a percentage of estimated total labor costs, depending upon which measure the Company believes best depicts the Company’s performance to date under the terms of the contract. Revenue recognized over time using an input measure was $37,488 and $33,225 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $104,309 and $87,369 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. A certain portion of the Company’s revenue recognized over time under these long-term agreements is recognized using an output method, specifically units delivered, based upon certain customer acceptance and delivery requirements. Revenue recognized over time using an output measure was $14,031 and $11,510 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $37,553 and $29,064 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had contract assets of $34,792 and $26,692, respectively, that were recorded in “Inventories - net” within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had contract liabilities of $3,343 and $1,505, respectively, that were recorded in “Deferred revenue” within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The majority of the Company’s revenue is from products transferred and services rendered to customers at a point in time. Point in time revenue accounted for 66.6% and 73.2% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and 71.9% and 74.8% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company recognizes revenue at the point in time at which the customer obtains control of the product or service, which is generally when the product title passes to the customer upon shipment or the service has been rendered to the customer. In limited cases, title does not transfer and revenue is not recognized until the customer has received the products at a physical location.

The following table summarizes the Company's net sales by major product and service category:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Rail Products$39,224  $49,234  $153,420  $139,600  
Rail Technologies28,517  35,283  91,416  98,971  
Rail Products and Services67,741  84,517  244,836  238,571  
Piling and Fabricated Bridge28,703  26,798  90,023  71,505  
Precast Concrete Products18,472  14,736  49,903  41,136  
Construction Products47,175  41,534  139,926  112,641  
Test, Inspection, and Threading Services12,249  15,296  40,777  44,517  
Protective Coatings and Measurement Systems27,111  25,747  80,139  66,709  
Tubular and Energy Services39,360  41,043  120,916  111,226  
Total net sales$154,276  $167,094  $505,678  $462,438  








11

Table of Contents
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Rail Products and Services $198,761
 $174,049
Construction Products 88,542
 81,074
Tubular and Energy Services 100,046
 100,006
Unallocated corporate assets 21,815
 37,894
Total $409,164
 $393,023
Net sales by the timing of the transfer of products and services was as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
Rail Products and
Services
Construction
Products
Tubular and Energy
Services
Total
Point in time$46,712  $29,375  $26,670  $102,757  
Over time21,029  17,800  12,690  51,519  
Total net sales$67,741  $47,175  $39,360  $154,276  
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Rail Products and
Services
Construction
Products
Tubular and Energy
Services
Total
Point in time$61,426  $27,459  $33,474  $122,359  
Over time23,091  14,075  7,569  44,735  
Total net sales$84,517  $41,534  $41,043  $167,094  
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Rail Products and
Services
Construction
Products
Tubular and Energy
Services
Total
Point in time$183,905  $90,565  $89,346  $363,816  
Over time60,931  49,361  31,570  141,862  
Total net sales$244,836  $139,926  $120,916  $505,678  
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Rail Products and
Services
Construction
Products
Tubular and Energy
Services
Total
Point in time$176,592  $74,581  $94,832  $346,005  
Over time61,979  38,060  16,394  116,433  
Total net sales$238,571  $112,641  $111,226  $462,438  

The timing of revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in billed receivables, costs in excess of billings (contract assets, included in “Inventories - net”), and billings in excess of costs (contract liabilities, included in “Deferred revenue”) on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Significant changes in contract assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 resulted from transfers to receivables from contract assets recognized at the beginning of the period of $22,320. Significant changes in contract liabilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 resulted from increases of $3,100 due to billings in excess of costs, excluding amounts recognized as revenue during the period. Contract liabilities were reduced due to revenue recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 of $194 and $406, respectively, and reduced due to revenue recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 of $1,460 and $1,146, respectively, that were included in the contract liabilities at the beginning of each period.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company had approximately $194,083 of remaining performance obligations, which is also referred to as backlog. Approximately 7.7% of the September 30, 2019 backlog was related to projects that are anticipated to extend beyond September 30, 2020.
Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table presents the goodwill balance by reportable segment:
Rail Products and
Services
Construction
Products
Tubular and Energy
Services
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2018$14,111  $5,147  $—  $19,258  
Foreign currency translation impact(328) —  —  (328) 
Balance as of September 30, 2019$13,783  $5,147  $—  $18,930  
  Rail Products and
Services
 Construction
Products
 Tubular and Energy
Services
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2016 $13,785
 $5,147
 $
 $18,932
Foreign currency translation impact 767
 
 
 767
Balance at September 30, 2017 $14,552
 $5,147
 $
 $19,699


The Company performs goodwill impairment tests annually during the fourth quarter, and also performs interim goodwill impairment tests if it is determined that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount. Qualitative factors are assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying
12

Table of Contents
amount. No interim goodwill impairment test was required in connection with these evaluations for the nine months endedevaluation of qualitative factors as of September 30, 2017. The Company continues to monitor the recoverability of the long-lived assets associated with certain reporting units of the Company and the long-term financial projections of the businesses. Sustained declines in the markets we serve may result in future long-lived asset impairment.2019.

The following table represents the gross other intangible assets balance by reportable segment:
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Rail Products and Services $57,538
 $56,476
Construction Products 1,348
 1,348
Tubular and Energy Services 29,179
 29,179
  $88,065
 $87,003


The components of the Company’s intangible assets arewere as follows:
September 30, 2019
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Non-compete agreements4$1,227  $(1,140) $87  
Patents10369  (181) 188  
Customer relationships1836,807  (13,021) 23,786  
Trademarks and trade names167,732  (3,382) 4,350  
Technology1435,551  (19,407) 16,144  
$81,686  $(37,131) $44,555  
December 31, 2018
Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
Gross
Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
Non-compete agreements4$1,372  $(1,046) $326  
Patents10358  (165) 193  
Customer relationships1837,129  (11,388) 25,741  
Trademarks and trade names158,481  (3,416) 5,065  
Technology1435,640  (17,129) 18,511  
$82,980  $(33,144) $49,836  
  September 30, 2017
  Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
 Gross
Carrying
Value
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Carrying
Amount
Non-compete agreements 5 $4,233
 $(2,872) $1,361
Patents 10 392
 (160) 232
Customer relationships 17 37,597
 (8,542) 29,055
Trademarks and trade names 14 10,078
 (3,879) 6,199
Technology 14 35,765
 (13,477) 22,288
    $88,065
 $(28,930) $59,135
         
  December 31, 2016
  Weighted Average
Amortization
Period In Years
 Gross
Carrying
Value
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Carrying
Amount
Non-compete agreements 5 $4,219
 $(2,217) $2,002
Patents 10 373
 (143) 230
Customer relationships 18 36,843
 (6,582) 30,261
Trademarks and trade names 14 10,018
 (3,238) 6,780
Technology 14 35,550
 (11,304) 24,246
    $87,003
 $(23,484) $63,519


Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, which range from 4 to 25 years, with a total weighted average amortization period of approximately 15 years atas of September 30, 2017.2019. Amortization expense was $1,655 and $1,762 for the three months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016 was $1,7642018, respectively, and $1,763, respectively. Amortization expense$5,046 and $5,322 for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016 was $5,2182018, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, gross intangible assets and $7,818, respectively.accumulated amortization were reduced as a result of the full amortization of certain intangible assets related to non-compete agreements of $124 and trademarks and trade names of $723.


EstimatedAs of September 30, 2019, estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 20172019 and thereafter iswas as follows:
Amortization Expense
Remainder of 2019$1,525  
20205,815  
20215,781  
20225,698  
20235,211  
2024 and thereafter20,525  
$44,555  

 Amortization Expense
2017$1,782
20187,024
20196,302
20205,980
20215,960
2022 and thereafter32,087
 $59,135
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLENote 5. Accounts Receivable
Credit is extended based upon an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and, while collateral is not required, the Company periodically receives surety bonds that guarantee payment. Credit terms are consistent with industry standards and practices. The amounts of trade accounts receivable atas of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 have been reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,138$1,152 and $1,417,$932, respectively. Changes in reserves for uncollectable accounts, which are recorded as part of “Selling and administrative expenses” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, resulted in income of $96 and $267 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and expense of $8 and income of $986 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

5. INVENTORIES
13

Table of Contents
Note 6. Inventory
Inventories atas of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 are summarized in the following table:
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
Finished goods$69,563  $69,041  
Contract assets34,792  26,692  
Work-in-process3,427  6,940  
Raw materials20,959  21,831  
Inventories - net$128,741  $124,504  
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Finished goods $58,588
 $46,673
Work-in-process 30,507
 21,716
Raw materials 19,851
 18,032
Total inventories at current costs 108,946
 86,421
Less: LIFO reserve (4,911) (3,178)
  $104,035
 $83,243


Inventory is generally valued at the lower of last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost or market. Other inventoriesInventories of the Company are valued at average cost or net realizable value, whichever is lower. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method is made at the end of each year based on the inventory levels
Note 7. Property, Plant, and costs at that time. Interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end levels and costs.
6. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENTEquipment
Property, plant, and equipment atas of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016 consist2018 consisted of the following:
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
Land$12,370  $12,440  
Improvements to land and leaseholds17,280  17,610  
Buildings35,914  34,608  
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under finance leases123,139  120,914  
Construction in progress1,333  3,083  
Gross property, plant, and equipment190,036  188,655  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of finance leases(107,243) (101,798) 
Property, plant, and equipment - net$82,793  $86,857  
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Land $14,866
 $14,826
Improvements to land and leaseholds 17,404
 17,408
Buildings 34,503
 33,910
Machinery and equipment, including equipment under capitalized leases 120,414
 118,060
Construction in progress 1,431
 1,291
  188,618
 185,495
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization, including accumulated amortization of capitalized leases 90,082
 81,522
  $98,536
 $103,973


Depreciation expense was $2,755 and $2,803 for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $8,295 and $8,685 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

We review our property, plant, and equipment for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. There were no asset0 impairments of property, plant, and equipment during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2019 and 2018.

Depreciation expense for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $3,178 and $3,295, respectively. For the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, depreciation expense was $9,705 and $10,620, respectively.Note 8. Leases
7. INVESTMENTS
The Company is a member of a joint venture, L B Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“L B Pipe JV”), in which it maintains a 45% ownership interest. L B Pipe JV manufactures, markets, and sells various machined components and precision coupling products for the energy, water well, and construction markets and is scheduled to terminate on June 30, 2019.

Under applicable guidance for variable interest entities in ASC 810, “Consolidation,”On January 1, 2019, the Company previously determined that L B Pipe JV was a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that it was notadopted ASU 2016-02 and all the primary beneficiaryrelated amendments using the modified retrospective approach, which resulted in an increase in assets of the variable interest entity, as the Company$13,585 and an increase in current and long-term liabilities of $3,322 and $10,263, respectively. This adoption did not have a controlling financial interest and did not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performanceaffect our results of L B Pipe JV.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, pursuant to the limited liability company agreement, the Company determined to sell its 45% ownership interest to the other 45% equity holder. The Company concluded that it has met the criteria under applicable guidance for a long-lived asset to be held for sale, and has, accordingly, reclassified L B Pipe JV investment of $4,288 as a current asset held for sale within other current assets. The asset was subsequently remeasured to its fair market value of $3,875. The difference between the fair market value and the Company's carrying amount of $413 was recorded as an other-than-temporary impairment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.


At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had a nonconsolidated equity method investment of $0 and $3,902, respectively, in L B Pipe JV and other equity investments totaling $151 and $129, respectively.

The Company recorded equity in the income of L B Pipe JV of $434 and loss of $276 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded equity in the income of L B Pipe JV of $386 and loss of $1,001, respectively.

During 2016, the Company and the other 45% member each executed a revolving line of credit with L B Pipe JV with an available limit of $1,350. The Company and the other 45% member each loaned $1,235 to L B Pipe JV in an effort to maintainoperations, cash flows, or our compliance with L B Pipe JV’s debtthe covenants with an unaffiliated bank. The Company is to receive its outstanding loan balance at the 45% equity interest sale date.

The Company’s exposure to loss results from its capital contributions and loans, net of the Company’s share of L B Pipe JV’s income or loss, and its net investment in the direct financing lease covering the facility used by L B Pipe JV for its operations, which is described below. The carrying amounts with the Company’s maximum exposure to loss at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, are as follows:
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
L B Pipe JV equity method investment $3,875
 $3,902
Revolving line of credit 1,235
 1,235
Net investment in direct financing lease 770
 871
  $5,880
 $6,008

The Company is leasing five acres of land and two facilities to L B Pipe JV through June 30, 2019, with a 5.5 year renewal period. The current monthly lease payments approximate $17, with a balloon payment of approximately $488, which is required to be paid either at the termination of the lease, allocated over the renewal period, or during the initial term of the lease. This lease qualifies as a direct financing lease under the applicable guidance in ASC 840-30, “Leases.”

The following is a schedule of the direct financing minimum lease payments for the remainder of 2017 and the years 2018 and thereafter:
 Minimum Lease Payments
2017$35
2018150
2019585
 $770
8. LONG-TERM DEBT
United States
Long-term debt consists of the following:
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Revolving credit facility $123,494
 $127,073
Term loan 13,131
 30,000
Capital leases and financing agreements 1,660
 2,492
Total 138,285
 159,565
Less current maturities 9,887
 10,386
Long-term portion $128,398
 $149,179

On November 7, 2016, the Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015, and as amended by the FirstSecond Amendment dated June 29,November 7, 2016, (the “Amendedor the covenants of the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 30, 2019.

We determine if an arrangement is a lease at its inception. Operating leases are included in “Operating lease right-of-use assets,” “Other current liabilities,” and “Long-term operating lease liabilities” within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases are included in “Property, plant, and equipment - net,” “Current maturities of long-term debt,” and “Long-term debt” in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of the lease payments. We use the implicit rate when readily determinable. The operating lease right-of-use asset also includes indirect costs incurred and lease payments made prior to the commencement date, less any lease incentives received. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease and will be recognized when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components that we account for as a single lease component. Also, for certain equipment leases, we apply a portfolio approach to effectively account for the operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities.

14

Table of Contents
Finance lease and lessor accounting recognition has remained substantially unchanged under ASU 2016-02. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 had no impact on the Company's balance sheet, results of operations, or cash flows for finance leases.

The Company has operating and finance leases for manufacturing facilities, corporate offices, sales offices, vehicles, and certain equipment. As of September 30, 2019, our leases had remaining lease terms of 1 to 12 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 12 years, and some of which include options to terminate the leases within 1 year. As of September 30, 2019, the Company’s operating leases had a weighted average remaining lease term of 6 years and a weighted average discount rate of 5.0%. As of September 30, 2019, the Company’s finance leases had a weighted average remaining lease term of 2 years and a weighted average discount rate of 4.3%.

The balance sheet components of the Company's leases were as follows as of September 30, 2019:
September 30, 2019
Operating leases
Operating lease right-of-use assets$13,234 
Other current liabilities$3,131 
Long-term operating lease liabilities10,103 
Total operating lease liabilities$13,234 
Finance leases
Property, plant, and equipment$3,448 
Accumulated amortization(2,828)
Property, plant, and equipment - net$620 
Current maturities of long-term debt$478 
Long-term debt142 
Total finance lease liabilities$620 

The components of lease expense within the Company's statements of operations were as follows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019:
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended
September 30, 2019September 30, 2019
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of finance leases$182  $539  
Interest on lease liabilities16  37  
Operating lease cost992  2,822  
Sublease income—  (18) 
Total lease cost$1,190  $3,380  

The cash flow components of the Company's leases were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2019:
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(3,287)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(539)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities:
Operating leases$2,459 


15

Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2019, estimated annual maturities of lease liabilities remaining for the year ending December 31, 2019 and thereafter were as follows:
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
Remaining 2019$1,072  $179  
20203,438  424  
20212,434  105  
20222,148  52  
20231,671  —  
2024 and thereafter5,054  —  
Total undiscounted lease payments15,817  760  
Interest(2,583) (140) 
Total$13,234  $620  

Note 9. Long-term Debt and Related Matters
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
Revolving credit facility$48,004  $74,008  
Term loan24,375  —  
Finance leases and financing agreements620  974  
Total72,999  74,982  
Less current maturities(2,978) (629) 
Long-term portion$70,021  $74,353  

On April 30, 2019, the Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian and European subsidiaries (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered into the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, of Pennsylvania,N.A., and Branch Banking and Trust Company.BMO Harris Bank, N.A. This Second Amendment modifiedAmended Credit Agreement modifies the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,prior revolving credit facility, which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000.$195,000 and extends the maturity date from March 13, 2020 to April 30, 2024. The Second Amendment reduced the permittedAmended Credit Agreement provides for a five-year, revolving credit facility that permits aggregate borrowings of the Borrowers up to $195,000$140,000 with a sublimit of the equivalent of $25,000 U.S. dollars that is available to the Canadian and provided

United Kingdom borrowers in the aggregate. The Amended Credit Agreement’s incremental loan feature permits the Company to increase the available revolving borrowings under the facility by up to an additional $50,000 and provides for additional term loan borrowingborrowings of $30,000 (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan isup to $25,000 subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore,Company’s receipt of increased commitments from existing or new lenders and the satisfaction of certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales,conditions.

The Company’s and the domestic, Canadian, and United Kingdom guarantors’ (the “Guarantors”) obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are secured by the grant of a security interest by the Borrowers and Guarantors in substantially all of the personal property owned by such entities. Additionally, the equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepaymentsinterests in each of the loan parties, other than the Company, and the equity interests held by each loan party in their domestic subsidiaries, have been pledged to the Term Loan. Term Loan borrowings are not available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall havelenders as collateral for the meanings ascribed to them inlending obligations.

Borrowings under the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provided for modificationsbear interest at rates based upon either the base rate or Euro-rate plus applicable margins. Applicable margins are dictated by the ratio of the Company’s total net indebtedness to the financial covenantsCompany’s consolidated EBITDA for four trailing quarters, as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls forbase rate is the eliminationhighest of (a) the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant throughOvernight Bank Funding Rate plus 50 basis points, (b) the quarter ending June 30, 2018. After that period,Prime Rate, or (c) the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ending September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ended December 31, 2016 through the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA had to be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ending June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. The incremental Minimum EBITDA requirement for the period ended September 30, 2017 was at least $23,000. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ending June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ended December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ending June 30, 2018. The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenantsDaily Euro-rate plus 100 basis points (each as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). The base rate and RestatedEuro-rate spreads range from 25 to 125 basis points and 125 to 225 basis points, respectively.

The Amended Credit Agreement. ThroughAgreement includes three financial covenants: (a) Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio, defined as the maturity dateCompany’s consolidated Indebtedness divided by the Company’s consolidated EBITDA, which must not exceed (i) 3.25 to 1.00 for all testing periods other than during an Acquisition Period, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, and (ii) 3.50 to 1.00 for all testing periods occurring during an Acquisition Period; (b) Minimum Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, defined as the Company's consolidated EBITDA divided by the Company's Fixed Charges, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, which must be less than 1.25 to 1.00; and (c) Minimum Working Capital to Revolving Facility Usage Ratio, defined as the sum of the loan,inventory and accounts receivable of the Borrowers and certain other Guarantors divided by the Revolving Facility Usage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, which must be less than 1.40 to 1.00.
16

Table of Contents
The Amended Credit Agreement permits the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annualto pay dividends and make distributions and redemptions with respect to its stock provided no event of dividendsdefault or redemptionspotential default (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) has occurred prior to or after giving effect to the dividend, distribution, or redemption. Additionally, the Amended Credit Agreement permits the Company to complete acquisitions so long as (a) no event of default or potential default has occurred prior to or as a result of such acquisition; (b) the liquidity of the Company’s stock was decreased from $4,000Borrowers is not less than $25,000 prior to $1,700. Thegiving effect to such acquisition; and (c) the aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore,consideration for the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000acquisition does not exceed: (i) $50,000 per acquisition; (ii) $50,000 in the aggregate throughfor multiple acquisitions entered into during four consecutive quarters; and (iii) $100,000 in the maturity dateaggregate over the term of the credit facility.Amended Credit Agreement.


AtOther restrictions exist at all times including, but not limited to, limitations on the Company’s sale of assets and the incurrence by either the Borrowers or the non-borrower subsidiaries of the Company of other indebtedness, guarantees, and liens.

As of September 30, 2017,2019, L.B. Foster was in compliance with the Second Amendment’s covenants.

The Second Amendment provided for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been definedcovenants in the First Amendment. Upon executionAmended Credit Agreement.

As of the Second Amendment through the quarter ending March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid, which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio, which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018, the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.

At September 30, 2017, L.B. Foster2019, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of approximately $425$836 and had net available borrowing capacity of $46,081.$91,160. The maturity date of the facility is March 13, 2020.April 30, 2024.


United Kingdom
A subsidiary ofOn April 29, 2019, the Company has a credit facility with NatWest Bank for itsthe Company's United Kingdom operations which includes an overdraft availability of £1,500 pounds sterling (approximately $2,010 at September 30, 2017). This credit facility supports the subsidiary’s working capital requirements and is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of its United Kingdom operations. The interest rate on this facility is the financial institution’s base rate plus 2.50%. Outstanding performance bonds reduce availability under this credit facility. The subsidiary of the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility at September 30, 2017. There was approximately $999 in outstanding guarantees (as defined in the underlying agreement) at September 30, 2017. This credit facility was renewed and amended during the fourth quarter of 2016 with all underlying terms and conditions remaining unchanged as a result of the renewal. It is the Company’s intention to renew this credit facility with NatWest Bank during the annual review within the forth quarter of 2017.terminated.

The United Kingdom credit facility contains certain financial covenants that require the subsidiary to maintain senior interest and cash flow coverage ratios. The subsidiary was in compliance with these financial covenants at September 30, 2017. The subsidiary had available borrowing capacity of $1,011 at September 30, 2017.

9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTSNote 10. Fair Value Measurements
The Company determines the fair value of assets and liabilities based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. The fair value hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions of what market participants would use. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as described below:


Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.


The classification of a financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.


Cash equivalents - Included within “Cash and cash equivalents” are investments in non-domestic term deposits. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of the instruments.


LIBOR-based interest rate swaps - To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The fair value of the interest rate swaps is based on market-observable forward interest rates and represents the estimated amount that the Company would pay to terminate the agreements. As such, the swap agreements are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. AtAs of September 30, 2017,2019, the interest rate swaps were recorded within other“Other accrued liabilities.
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting DateFair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
September 30,
2019
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
December 31,
2018
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Term deposits$17  $17  $—  $—  $16  $16  $—  $—  
Interest rate swaps—  —  —  —  675  —  675  —  
Total assets$17  $17  $—  $—  $691  $16  $675  $—  
Interest rate swaps$657  $—  $657  $—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
Total liabilities$657  $—  $657  $—  $—  $—  $—  $—  
  Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date and Using Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date and Using
  September 30,
2017
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level  1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 December 31,
2016
 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level  1)
 Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Term deposits $17
 $17
 $
 $
 $16
 $16
 $
 $
Total assets $17
 $17
 $
 $
 $16
 $16
 $
 $
Interest rate swaps $323
 $
 $323
 $
 $334
 $
 $334
 $
Total liabilities $323
 $
 $323
 $
 $334
 $
 $334
 $


The interest rate swaps are accounted for as fair valuecash flow hedges and substantiallythe objective of the hedges is to offset the changes in fair valueexpected interest variability on payments associated with the interest rate of the hedged portion of the underlying debt that are attributable to the changes in market risk. Therefore, theour debt. The gains and losses related to changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and included in interest income or“Interest expense - net” in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.Operations as the interest expense from our debt is recognized. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2019 and 2018, we recognized interest expense from interest rate swaps was $98. Forincome of $21 and $18, respectively, and for the nine
17

Table of Contents
months ended September 30, 2017,2019 and 2018, we recognized interest income of $142 and interest expense of $16, respectively, from interest rate swaps was $302.swaps.


In accordance with the provisions of ASCthe FASB's Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, "Fair“Fair Value Measurement," the Company measures certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value, which are recognized or disclosed on a nonrecurring basis. During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, a $413 other-than-temporary impairment charge was recorded against L B Pipe JV assets held for sale utilizing a Level 2 fair value measurement. The impairment was a result of the Company's carrying value being greater than the agreed-upon sales price, or fair market value. See
Note 7 Investments of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.

10. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE11. Earnings Per Common Share
(Share amounts in thousands)


The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Net income$3,064  $6,408  $16,318  $9,984  
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding10,420  10,365  10,406  10,361  
Denominator for basic earnings per common share10,420  10,365  10,406  10,361  
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock compensation plans254  124  225  120  
Dilutive potential common shares254  124  225  120  
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding10,674  10,489  10,631  10,481  
Basic earnings per common share$0.29  $0.62  $1.57  $0.96  
Diluted earnings per common share$0.29  $0.61  $1.53  $0.95  

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share:        
Net income (loss) $3,222
 $(5,982) $3,824
 $(100,810)
Denominator:        
Weighted average shares outstanding 10,341
 10,296
 10,332
 10,264
Denominator for basic earnings per common share 10,341
 10,296
 10,332
 10,264
Effect of dilutive securities:        
Stock compensation plans 138
 
 103
 
Dilutive potential common shares 138
 
 103
 
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares outstanding and assumed conversions 10,479
 10,296
 10,435
 10,264
Basic earnings (loss) per common share $0.31
 $(0.58) $0.37
 $(9.82)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $0.31
 $(0.58) $0.37
 $(9.82)
Dividends paid per common share $
 $0.04
 $
 $0.12

There were approximately 34 and 80 anti-dilutive shares during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016, respectively, excluded from the above calculation.
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATIONNote 12. Stock-based Compensation
The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” to account for the Company’s stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and is recognized over the employees’ requisite service period.periods. The Company recorded stock compensation expense of $503 and $320 for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to fully-vested stock awards, restricted stock awards and performance unit awards. Stock compensation expenseshare units of $1,228$876 and $875 was recorded$934 for the nine-month periodsthree months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016, respectively. At2018, respectively, and $2,910 and $2,838 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019 and 2018, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, unrecognized compensation expense for unvested awards that the Company expects to vest approximated $4,140.$5,063. The Company will recognize this expense over the upcoming 3.5 years through March 2021.April 2023.


Shares issued as a result of vested stock-based compensation awards generally will be from previously issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company and held as treasury stock or authorized and previously unissued common stock.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recognized a tax deficiency of $127 related to stock-based compensation, which was fully offset by a valuation allowance, and $124 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Applying the prospective approach in accordance with ASU 2016-09, the change in excess income tax deficiency has been included in cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.


Restricted Stock Awards and Performance Unit AwardsShare Units
Under the 2006 Omnibus Plan, the Company grants eligible employees restricted stock and performance unit awards.share units. The forfeitable restricted stock awards granted prior to March 2015 generally time-vest after a four-year period, and those granted subsequent to March 2015 generally time-vest ratably over a three-yearthree-year period, unless indicated otherwise by the underlying restricted stock agreement. Since May 2018, awards of restricted stock are subject to a minimum one-year vesting period, including those granted to non-employee directors. Prior to May 2018, awards to non-employee directors were made in fully-vested shares. Performance unit awardsshare units are offered annually under separate three-yearthree-year long-term incentive programs. Performance share units are subject to forfeiture and will be converted into common stock of the Company based upon the Company’s performance relative to performance measures and conversion multiples, as defined in the underlying program. If the Company’s estimate of the number of performance stock awardsshare units expected to vest changes in a subsequent accounting period, cumulative compensation expense could increase or decrease. The change will be recognized in the current period for the vested shares and would change future expense over the remaining vesting period.


During the quarter ended June 30,Since May 1, 2017, the Nomination and Governance Committee and Board of Directors jointly approved the Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors under the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, which permits Non-Employee Directors of the Companynon-employee directors have been permitted to defer receipt of earnedannual stock awards and equity elected to be received in lieu of quarterly cash and/orcompensation. If so elected, these deferred stock compensation forunits will be issued as common stock six months after separation from their service on the Board. DuringBoard of Directors. Since May 2018, there have been no non-employee directors who elected the quarter ended March 31, 2017,option to receive deferred stock units of the Company’s common stock in lieu of director cash compensation.

18

Table of Contents
In February 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the 20172019 Performance Share Unit Program and the Executive Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (consisting of cash and equity components). The Compensation Committee also certified the actual Company performance achievement of participants in the 20142016 Performance Share Unit Program. ActualProgram, which actual performance resulted in no payout relative to the 20142016 Performance Share Unit Program target performance metrics.


The following table summarizes the restricted stock award,awards, deferred stock award,units, and performance unit awardshare units activity for the periodnine months ended September 30, 2017:2019:
Restricted
Stock
Deferred
Stock Units
Performance
Share Units
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018191,825  41,774  300,373  $18.61  
Granted62,125  12,304  89,092  18.63  
Vested(87,782) —  —  19.51  
Adjustment for incentive awards not expected to vest—  —  (15,015) 19.26  
Cancelled and forfeited(6,500) —  —  20.11  
Outstanding as of September 30, 2019159,668  54,078  374,450  $18.58  

  Restricted
Stock
 Deferred
Stock
 Performance
Stock Units
 Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2016 79,272
 
 63,690
 $21.66
Granted 170,196
 24,927
 120,583
 14.24
Vested (22,808) 
 
 28.88
Adjustment for incentive awards expected to vest 
 
 53,385
 18.33
Cancelled (44,854) 
 (49,062) 15.40
Outstanding at September 30, 2017 181,806
 24,927
 188,596
 $16.48
12. RETIREMENT PLANSNote 13. Retirement Plans
Retirement Plans
The Company has seven3 retirement plans that cover its hourly and salaried employees in the United States: three1 defined benefit plans, all ofplan, which areis frozen, and four2 defined contribution plans. Employees are eligible to participate in the appropriate plan based on employment classification. The Company’s contributions to the defined benefit and defined contribution plans are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and the Company’s policy and investment guidelines applicable to each respective plan. The Company’s policy is to contribute at least the minimum in accordance with the funding standards of ERISA.


The Company’s subsidiary, L.B. Foster Rail Technologies, Inc. (“Rail Technologies”),Company maintains two2 defined contribution plans for its employees in Canada, as well as aone post-retirement benefit plan. In the United Kingdom, Rail TechnologiesThe Company also maintains two2 defined contribution plans and aone defined benefit plan.plan for its employees in the United Kingdom.


United States Defined Benefit PlansPlan
Net periodic pension costs for the United States defined benefit pension plansplan for the three-three and nine-month periodsnine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016 are2018 were as follows:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Interest cost$162  $155  $486  $466  
Expected return on plan assets(180) (213) (540) (640) 
Recognized net actuarial loss31  24  94  72  
Net periodic pension cost (income)$13  $(34) $40  $(102) 
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Service cost $
 $9
 $
 $27
Interest cost 171
 186
 513
 559
Expected return on plan assets (178) (179) (533) (538)
Recognized net actuarial loss 33
 69
 98
 207
Net periodic pension cost $26
 $85
 $78
 $255


TheDuring the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company does not expect to contributecontributed approximately $550 to its United States defined benefit plans in 2017.pension plan and expects no additional contributions during the remainder of 2019.


United Kingdom Defined Benefit PlansPlan
Net periodic pension costs for the United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan for the three-three and nine-month periodsnine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016 are2018 were as follows:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
Interest cost$53  $51  $159  $153  
Expected return on plan assets(60) (70) (180) (210) 
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount10   30  15  
Recognized net actuarial loss52  48  156  144  
Net periodic pension cost$55  $34  $165  $102  
19

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
Interest cost $56
 $73
 $168
 $223
Expected return on plan assets (67) (82) (201) (250)
Amortization of prior service costs and transition amount 4
 5
 12
 15
Recognized net actuarial loss 72
 38
 216
 116
Net periodic pension cost $65
 $34
 $195
 $104
Table of Contents

United Kingdom regulations require trustees to adopt a prudent approach to funding required contributions to defined benefit pension plans. EmployerThe Company anticipates contributions of approximately $251 are anticipated$241 to the United Kingdom Rail Technologies pension plan during 2017.2019. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company contributed approximately $188$187 to the plan.


Defined Contribution Plans
The Company sponsors eight6 defined contribution plans for hourly and salaried employees across our domestic and international facilities. The following table summarizes the expense associated with the contributions made to these plans.plans:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2019201820192018
United States$656  $766  $1,887  $2,080  
Canada29  23  102  91  
United Kingdom103  114  328  328  
$788  $903  $2,317  $2,499  

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016 2017 2016
United States $415
 $152
 $1,276
 $1,289
Canada 53
 46
 167
 164
United Kingdom 93
 64
 306
 281
  $561
 $262
 $1,749
 $1,734
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIESNote 14. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
Product Liability Claims
The Company is subject to product warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. For certain manufactured products, the Company maintains a product warranty accrual, which is adjusted on a monthly basis as a percentage of cost of sales. TheIn addition, the product warranty accrual is adjusted periodically adjusted based on the identification or resolution of known individual product warranty claims.


The following table sets forth the Company’s product warranty accrual:
Warranty Liability
Balance as of December 31, 2018$2,057 
Additions to warranty liability515 
Warranty liability utilized(1,350)
Balance as of September 30, 2019$1,222 
 Warranty Liability
Balance at December 31, 2016$10,154
Additions to warranty liability3,203
Warranty liability utilized(3,743)
Balance at September 30, 2017$9,614

Included within the above table are concrete tie warranty reserves of approximately $7,607 and $7,574 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.


Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)(“UPRR”) Concrete Tie Matter
On July 12, 2011, UPRR notified (the “UPRR Notice”)March 13, 2019, the Company and its subsidiary, CXT Incorporated (“CXT”), of entered into a warranty claim under CXT’s 2005 supply contract relating to the sale of pre-stressed concrete railroad ties to UPRR. UPRR asserted that a significant percentage of concrete ties manufactured in 2006 through 2011 at CXT’s Grand Island, NE facility failed to meet contract specifications, had workmanship defects and were cracking and failing prematurely. Of the 3 million ties manufactured between 1998 and 2011 from the Grand Island, NE facility, approximately 1.6 million ties were sold during the period UPRR had claimed nonconformance.The 2005 contract called for each concrete tie which failed to conform to the specifications or had a material defect in workmanship to be replaced with 1.5 new concrete ties, provided, that, within five years of the sale of a concrete tie, UPRR notified CXT of such failure to conform or such defect in workmanship.
The UPRR Notice did not specify how many ties manufactured during this period were defective nor the exact nature of the alleged workmanship defect.

Following the UPRR Notice, the Company worked with material scientists and pre-stressed concrete experts to test a representative sample of Grand Island, NE concrete ties and assess warranty claims for certain concrete ties made in its Grand Island, NE facility between 1998 and 2011. The Company discontinued manufacturing operations in Grand Island, NE in early 2011.

2012
During 2012, the Company completed sufficient testing and analysis to further understand this matter. Based upon testing results and expert analysis, the Company believed it discovered conditions, which largely related to the 2006 to 2007 manufacturing period, that can shorten the life of the concrete ties produced during this period. During the fourth quarter of 2012 and first quarter of 2013, the Company reached agreement with UPRR on several matters including a tie rating process for the Company and UPRR to work together to identify, prioritize, and replace defective ties that meet the criteria for replacement. This process applies to the ties the Company shipped to UPRR from its Grand Island, NE facility from 1998 to 2011. During most of this period, the Company’s warranty policy for UPRR carried a 5-year warranty with a 1.5:1 replacement ratio for any defective ties. In order to accommodate UPRR and other customer concerns, the Company also reverted to a previously used warranty policy providing a 15-year warranty with a 1:1 replacement ratio. This change provided an additional 10 years of warranty protection. In the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company and UPRR also extended the supply of Tucson ties by five years and agreed on a cash payment of $12,000 to UPRR as compensation for concrete ties already replaced by UPRR during the investigation period.

During 2012, as a result of the testing that the Company conducted on concrete ties manufactured at its former Grand Island, NE facility and the developments related to UPRR and other customer matters, the Company recorded pre-tax warranty charges of $22,000 in “Cost of Goods Sold” within its Rail Products and Services segment based on the Company’s estimate of the number of defective concrete ties that will ultimately require replacement during the applicable warranty periods.

2013
Throughout 2013, at UPRR’s request and under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement, the Company provided warranty replacement concrete ties for use across certain UPRR subdivisions. The Company attempted to reconcile the quantity of warranty claims for ties replaced and obtain supporting detail for the ties removed. The Company believes that UPRR did not replace concrete ties in accordance with the amended agreement and has not furnished adequate documentation throughout the replacement process in these subdivisions to support its full warranty claim. Based on the information received by the Company to date, the Company believes that a significant number of ties which UPRR replaced in these subdivisions did not meet the criteria to be covered as warranty replacement ties under the amended 2005 supply agreement. The disagreement related to the 2013 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 170,000 ties where the Company provided detailed documentation supporting our position with reason codes that detail why these ties are not eligible for a warranty claim.

In late November 2013, the Company received notice from UPRR asserting a material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement. UPRR’s notice asserted that the failure to honor its claims for warranty ties in these subdivisions was a material breach. Following receipt of this notice, the Company provided information to UPRR to refute UPRR’s claim of breach and included the reconciliation of warranty claims supported by substantial findings from the Company’s track observation team, all within the 90-day cure period. The Company also proposed further discussions to reach agreement on reconciliation for 2013 replacement activities and future replacement activities and a recommended process that will ensure future replacement activities are done with appropriate documentation and per the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

2014
During the first quarter of 2014, the Company further responded within the 90-day cure period to UPRR’s claim and presented a reconciliation for the subdivisions at issue. This proposed reconciliation was based on empirical data and visual observation from Company employees that were present during the replacement process for a substantial majority of the concrete ties replaced. The Company spent considerable time documenting facts related to concrete tie condition and track condition to assess whether the ties replaced met the criteria to be eligible for replacement under the terms of the amended 2005 supply agreement.

During 2014, the Company increased its accrual by an additional $8,766 based on revised estimates of ties to be replaced based upon scientific testing and other analysis, adjusted for ties already provided to UPRR. The Company continued to workSettlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with UPRR to identify, replace, and reconcile defective ties related toresolve the warranty claimpending litigation in accordance with the amended 2005 supply agreement. Thematter of Union Pacific Railroad Company v. L.B. Foster Company and UPRR met during the third quarter of 2014 to evaluate each other’s position in an effort to work towards agreement on the unreconciled 2013 and 2014 replacement activity as well as the standards and practices to be implemented for future replacement activity and warranty tie replacement.

In November and December of 2014, the Company received additional notices from UPRR asserting that ties manufactured in 2000 were defective and again asserting material breaches of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacements as well as certain new ties provided to UPRR being out of specification.

At December 31, 2014, the Company and UPRR had not been able to reconcile the disagreement related to the 2013 and 2014 warranty replacement activity. The disagreement relating to the 2014 warranty replacement activity includes approximately 90,100 ties that the Company believes are not warranty-eligible.

2015
On January 23, 2015, UPRR filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury TrialCXT Incorporated, Case No. CI 15-564, in the District Court for Douglas County, NE (“Complaint”) againstNebraska.

Under the Settlement Agreement, the Company and CXT will pay UPRR the aggregate amount of $50,000 without pre-judgment interest, which began with a $2,000 immediate payment, and with the remaining $48,000 paid in installments over a six-year period commencing on the effective date of the Settlement Agreement through December 2024 pursuant to a Promissory Note. Additionally, commencing in January 2019 and through December 2024, UPRR agreed to purchase from the Company and its subsidiary, CXT, asserting, among other matters, that the Company breached its express warranty, breached an implied covenantsubsidiaries and affiliates, a cumulative total amount of good faith$48,000 of products and fair dealing, and anticipatorily repudiated its warranty obligations, and that UPRR’s exclusive and limited remedy provisions in the supply agreement have failedservices, targeting $8,000 of their essential purpose which entitles UPRR to recover all incidental and consequential damages. The Complaint seeks to cancel all dutiesannual purchases per year beginning March 13, 2019 per letters of UPRRintent under the contract, to adjudge the Company as having no remaining rights under the contracts, and to recover damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the value of unfulfilled warranty replacement ties and ties likely to become warranty eligible, for costs of cover for replacement ties, and for various incidental and consequential damages.Settlement Agreement. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that UPRR’s exclusive remedy is to receiveSettlement Agreement also includes a replacement tie that meets the contract specifications for each tie that failed to meet the contract specifications or otherwise contained a material defect provided that the Company receives written notice of such failure or defect within 15 years after that tie was produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement provides that the Company’s warranty does not apply to ties that (a) have been repaired or altered without the Company’s written consent in such a way as to affect the stability or reliability thereof, (b) have been subject to misuse, negligence, or accident, or (c) have been improperly maintained or used contrary to the specifications for which such ties were produced. The amended 2005 supply agreement also continues to provide that the Company’s warranty is in lieumutual release of all other expressclaims and liability regarding or implied warranties and that neither party shall be subject to or liable for any incidental or consequential damages to the other party. The dispute is largely based on (1) claims submitted that the Company believes are for ties claimed for warranty replacement that are inaccurately rated under concrete tie rating guidelines and procedures agreed to in 2012 and incorporated by amendment to the 2005 supply agreement rated and are not the responsibility of the Company and claims that do not meet the criteria of a warranty replacement and (2) UPRR’s assertion, which the Company vigorously disputes, that UPRR in future years will be entitled to warranty replacement ties for virtually all of the Grand Island ties. Many thousands of Grand Island ties have been performing in track for over ten years. In addition, a significant amount of Grand Island ties were rated by both parties in the excellent category of the rating system.

In June 2015, UPRR delivered an additional notice alleging deficiencies in certain ties produced in the Company’s Tucson and Spokane locations and other claimed material breaches which the Company contends are unfounded. The Company again responded to UPRR that it was not in material breach of the amended 2005 supply agreement relating to warranty tie replacementsall CXT pre-stressed concrete railroad ties with no admission of liability and that the ties in question complied with the specifications provided by UPRR.

On June 16 and 17, 2015, UPRR issued a formal notice of the termination of the concrete tie supply agreement as well as the termination of the lease agreement at the Tucson, AZ production facility and rejection and revocation of its prior acceptance of certain ties manufactured at the Company’s Spokane, WA production facility. Since that time, UPRR has discontinued submitting purchase orders to the Company for shipment of warranty replacement ties.

On May 29, 2015, the Company and CXT filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims in response to the Complaint, denying liability to UPRR. As a result of UPRR’s subsequent June 16-17, 2015 actions and certain related conduct, the Company on October 5, 2015 amended the pending Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to add, among other things, assertions that UPRR’s conduct in question was wrongful and unjustified and constituted additional grounds for the affirmative defenses to UPRR’s claims and also for the Company’s counterclaims.

2016
By Scheduling Order dated June 29, 2016, an August 31, 2017 deadline for the completion of fact discovery was established with trial to proceed at some future date after October 30, 2017, and UPRR filed an amended notice of trial to commence on October 30, 2017.

2017
By Third Amended Scheduling Order dated September 26, 2017, a June 29, 2018 deadline for completion of discovery has been established with trial to proceed at some future date on or after October 1, 2018. During the first nine months ended September 30, 2017, the parties continued to conduct discovery, with various disputes that required and will likely require court resolution. The Company intends to continue to engage in discussions in an effort to resolve the UPRR matter. However, we cannot predict that such discussions will be successful, or that the resultsdismissal of the litigation with prejudice.

The expected payments under the UPRR or any settlement or judgment amounts, will reasonably approximate our estimated accrualsSettlement Agreement for loss contingencies. Future potential costs pertaining to UPRR’s claims and the outcomeremainder of the UPRR litigation could result in a material adverse effect on our resultsyear ending December 31, 2019 and thereafter are as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
Remainder of 2019$4,000  
20208,000  
20218,000  
20228,000  
20238,000  
20248,000  
Total$44,000  

20

Table of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.Contents

As a result of the preliminary status of the litigation and the uncertainty of any potential judgment, an estimate of any additional loss, or a range of additional loss, associated with this litigation cannot be made based upon currently available information.

Environmental and Legal Proceedings
The Company is subject to national, state, foreign, provincial, and/or local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company’s efforts to comply with environmental regulations may have an adverse effect on its future earnings.

On June 5, 2017, a General Notice Letter was received from the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"(“EPA”) indicating that the Company may be a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) regarding the Portland Harbor Superfund Site cleanup along with numerous other companies. More than 140 other companies received such a notice. The Company and a predecessor owned and operated a facility near the harbor site for a period prior to 1982. By letter dated March 16, 2018, the EPA informed the Company of the proposed schedule for consent decree negotiations to implement the Portland Harbor Superfund Site Record of Decision, with negotiations scheduled to commence by the end of 2019, and the EPA also set a proposed deadline of June 2019 to conclude negotiations with PRPs for the performance of remedial design work in the harbor. The net present value and undiscounted costs of the selected remedy throughout the harbor site are estimated by the EPA to be approximately $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, and the remedial work is expected to take as long as 13 years to complete. The Company is reviewing the basis for its identification by the EPA and the nature of the historic operations of an L.B. Fostera Company predecessor onnear the site. ManagementAdditionally, the Company executed a PRP agreement which provides for a private allocation process among almost 100 PRPs in a working group whose work is ongoing. We cannot predict the ultimate impact of these proceedings because of the large number of PRPs involved throughout the harbor site, the degree of contamination of various wastes, varying environmental impacts throughout the harbor site, the scarcity of data related to the facility once operated by the Company and a predecessor, and the speculative nature of the remediation costs. Based upon information currently available, management does not believe that the Company’s alleged PRP status regarding the Portland Harbor Superfund Site or other compliance with the present environmental protection laws will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, competitive position, or capital expenditures of the Company.


AtAs of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, the Company maintained environmental reserves approximating $6,255$6,058 and $6,270,$6,128, respectively. The following table sets forth the Company’s environmental obligation:
Environmental liability
Balance as of December 31, 2018$6,128 
Additions to environmental obligations
Environmental obligations utilized(73)
Balance as of September 30, 2019$6,058 
 Environmental liability
Balance at December 31, 2016$6,270
Additions to environmental obligations7
Environmental obligations utilized(22)
Balance at September 30, 2017$6,255


The Company is also subject to other legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Legal actions are subject to inherent uncertainties, and future events could change management's assessment of the probability or estimated amount of potential losses from pending or threatened legal actions. Based on available information, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending or threatened legal actions, both individually and in the aggregate, will not result in losses having a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or liquidity atas of September 30, 2017.2019.


If management believes that, based on available information, it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss (or additional material loss in excess of any accrual) will be incurred in connection with any legal actions, the Company discloses an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss, either individually or in the aggregate, as appropriate, if such an estimate can be made, or discloses that an estimate cannot be made. Based on the Company's assessment atas of September 30, 2017,2019, no such disclosures were considered necessary.


14. INCOME TAXESNote 15. Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company recorded an income tax benefitprovision of $208$51 and $18 on pretaxpre-tax income of $3,014$3,115 and $3,379 on pretax losses of $9,361,$6,426, respectively, for an effective income tax rate of (6.9)%1.6% and 36.1%0.3%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $698$2,374 and $1,271 on pretaxpre-tax income of $4,522$18,692 and an income tax benefit of $42,125 on pretax losses of $142,935,$11,255, respectively, for an effective income tax rate of 15.4%12.7% and 29.5%11.3%, respectively. The Company’sCompany's effective tax provisionrate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 is2019 differed from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily comprised of taxes on our Canadian and United Kingdom operations. However, as a result of the U.S. consolidated group's current year income, the Company's estimated annual effective tax rate was adjusted during the third quarterdue to include the realization of a portion of its U.S. deferred tax assets previously offset by a valuation allowance. The Company continued to maintain a full valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets, which is likely to result in significant variability of the effective tax rate in the current year. Changes in pretaxpre-tax income projections and the mix of income across jurisdictions could also impact the effective income tax rate.
15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTSNote 16. Subsequent Events
Management evaluated allOn October 29, 2019, the Company announced to certain union and non-union employees at our CXT Concrete Buildings facility, located in Spokane, Washington, the intent to relocate the pre-fabricated concrete buildings manufacturing operation to Boise, Idaho. This move is part of an initiative focusing on regional growth opportunities and logistical savings associated with fabricating product in a more centralized location closer to the Company’s existing and prospective customer base. The Company expects to cease pre-fabricated building operations in Spokane, Washington, and commence operations in Boise, Idaho, in the first quarter of 2020.

21

Table of Contents
As a result of this relocation, the Company expects to incur certain exit and disposal charges consisting of severance, relocation, and employee retention expense, as well as site clean-up and facility restoration expense, totaling approximately $1,000 to $1,500 in its Construction Products operating segment. The approximate expense resulting from this relocation could change materially as a result of certain factors such as employee acceptances of the activityseverance packages offered and unknown or unforeseen costs as part of winding up operations at the Company and concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosure in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.Spokane, Washington fabrication facility.

22

Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”Operations” (“MD&A”). Forward-looking statements provide management's current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Sentences containing words such as “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “expect,” “should,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions of a future or forward-looking nature generally should be considered forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based on management's current expectations and assumptions about future events that involve inherent risks and uncertainties and may concern, among other things, L.B. Foster Company’s (the “Company”“Company’s”) expectations relating to our strategy, goals, projections, and plans regarding our financial position, liquidity, capital resources, and results of operations; the outcome of litigation and product warranty claims; decisions regarding our strategic growth initiatives, market position, and product development; all of which are based on current estimates that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on current expectations and assumptions about future events.development. While the Company considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory, and other risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company’s control. The Company cautions readers that various factors could cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. Among the factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements are risks and uncertainties related to: a resumption of the economic slowdown we experienced in previous years in the markets we serve; a decrease in freight or passenger rail traffic; environmental matters, including any costs associated with any remediation and monitoring; a resumption of the economic slowdown we have experienced in the previous two years in the markets we serve; the risk of doing business in international markets; our ability to effectuate our strategy, including cost reduction initiatives, and our ability to effectively integrate acquired businesses and realize anticipated benefits; costs of and impacts associated with shareholder activism; a decrease in freight or passenger rail traffic; the timeliness and availability of materials from our major suppliers as well as the impact on our access to supplies of customer preferences as to the origin of such supplies, such as customers' concerns about conflict minerals; labor disputes; cyber-security risks such as data security breaches, malware, “hacking,” and identity theft, a failure of which could disrupt our business and may result in misuse or misappropriation of confidential or proprietary information, and could result in the disruption or damage to our systems, increased costs and losses or an adverse effect to our reputation; the continuing effective implementation of an enterprise resource planning system; changes in current accounting estimates and their ultimate outcomes; the adequacy of internal and external sources of funds to meet financing needs, including our ability to negotiate any additional necessary amendments to our credit agreement;agreement or the terms of any new credit agreement, and reforms regarding the use of LIBOR as a benchmark for establishing applicable interest rates; the Company’s ability to manage its working capital requirements and indebtedness; domestic and international taxes, including estimates that may impact these amounts; foreign currency fluctuations; inflation; domestic and foreign government regulations;regulations, including tariffs; economic conditions and regulatory changes caused by the United Kingdom’s pending exit from the European Union;Union, including the possibility of a “no-deal Brexit;” sustained declines in energy prices; a lack of state or federal funding for new infrastructure projects; an increase in manufacturing or material costs; the ultimate number of concrete ties that will have to be replaced pursuant to the previously disclosed product warranty claim of the Union Pacific Railroad (“UPRR”) and an overall resolution of the related contract claims as well as the possible costs associated with the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the UPRR; the loss of future revenues from current customers; and risks inherent in litigation.litigation and the outcome of litigation and product warranty claims. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements prove incorrect, actual outcomes could vary materially from those indicated. Significant risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, and results of the Company’s business and forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, or as updated and amended by Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in Part II of our other periodic filingsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


The forward-looking statements in this report are made as of the date of this report and we assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws.


General Overview
L.B. Foster Company (the “Company”) is a leading manufacturer and distributor of products and services for the transportation and energy infrastructure with locations in North America and Europe. The Company is comprised of three businessoperating segments: Rail Products and Services, Construction Products, and Tubular and Energy Services.

Quarter-to-Date Results
23

Table of Contents
The segment gross profit measures presented within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performanceQuarter
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent of Total Net Sales
Three Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services$67,741  $84,517  (19.8)%43.9 %50.6 %
Construction Products47,175  41,534  13.6  30.6  24.9  
Tubular and Energy Services39,360  41,043  (4.1) 25.5  24.5  
Total net sales$154,276  $167,094  (7.7)%100.0 %100.0 %
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Gross Profit Percentage
Three Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Gross Profit:
Rail Products and Services$14,480  $16,416  (11.8)%21.4 %19.4 %
Construction Products6,097  5,770  5.7  12.9  13.9  
Tubular and Energy Services7,115  9,117  (22.0) 18.1  22.2  
Total gross profit$27,692  $31,303  (11.5)%17.9 %18.7 %
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent of Total Net Sales
Three Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses$22,264  $21,662  2.8 %14.4 %13.0 %
Amortization expense1,655  1,762  (6.1) 1.1  1.1  
Interest expense - net1,079  1,296  (16.7) 0.7  0.8  
Other (income) expense - net(421) 157  **  (0.3) 0.1  
Total expenses$24,577  $24,877  (1.2)%15.9 %14.9 %
Income before income taxes$3,115  $6,426  (51.5)%2.0 %3.8 %
Income tax expense51  18  183.3  0.0  0.0  
Net income$3,064  $6,408  (52.2)%2.0 %3.8 %

** Results of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. The exclusion of significant cost allocations to the reportable segments:calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.

Allows users to understand the operational performance of our reportable segments;
Provides greater comparability to other registrants with similar businesses and avoids possible non-comparability at the reportable segment pre-tax profit level resulting from our specific corporate cost allocations; and
Facilitates a clearer, market-based perspective on the strength or weakness of our reportable segments in their markets to better aid in investment decisions.

In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures have historically been key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.
Three months ended September 30, 2017 Rail Products and
Services
 Construction
Products
 Tubular and Energy
Services
 Total
Reportable Segment Profit $3,472
 $3,387
 $2,298
 $9,157
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative 9,405
 4,620
 3,337
 17,362
Amortization Expense 940
 38
 786
 1,764
Asset Impairments 
 
 
 
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit $13,817
 $8,045
 $6,421
 $28,283
         
Three months ended September 30, 2016 Rail Products and
Services
 Construction
Products
 Tubular and Energy
Services
 Total
Reportable Segment (Loss) Profit $(2,047) $1,356
 $(6,966) $(7,657)
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative 8,926
 4,783
 4,290
 17,999
Amortization Expense 958
 38
 767
 1,763
Asset Impairments 4,383
 
 2,563
 6,946
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit $12,220
 $6,177
 $654
 $19,051

      Percent of Total Net Sales  
  Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
  September 30, September 30, 
  
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales:          
Rail Products and Services $62,095
 $56,891
 47.2 % 49.6 % 9.1 %
Construction Products 39,118
 34,870
 29.7
 30.4
 12.2
Tubular and Energy Services 30,279
 22,883
 23.1
 20.0
 32.3
Total net sales $131,492
 $114,644
 100.0 % 100.0 % 14.7 %
           
      Non-GAAP / Reported
Gross Profit Percentage
 Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
  Three Months Ended Three Months Ended 
  September 30, September 30, 
  
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Gross Profit:          
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services $13,817
 $12,220
 22.3 % 21.5 % 13.1 %
Non-GAAP Construction Products 8,045
 6,177
 20.6
 17.7
 30.2
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services 6,421
 654
 21.2
 2.9
 **
Non-GAAP Segment gross profit 28,283
 19,051
      
LIFO (expense) income (1,552) 917
 (1.2) 0.8
 **
Other (366) (165) (0.3) (0.1) 121.8
Total gross profit $26,365
 $19,803
 20.1 % 17.3 % 33.1 %
        Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
      Percent of Total Net Sales 
  Three Months Ended Three Months Ended 
  September 30, September 30, 
  2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Expenses:          
Selling and administrative expenses $20,218
 $19,807
 15.4 % 17.3 % 2.1 %
Amortization expense 1,764
 1,763
 1.3
 1.5
 0.1
Asset impairments 
 6,946
 
 6.1
 (100.0)
Interest expense 2,026
 1,520
 1.5
 1.3
 33.3
Interest income (56) (50) 
 
 12.0
Equity in (income) loss of nonconsolidated investments (50) 263
 
 0.2
 (119.0)
Other income (551) (1,085) (0.4) (0.9) 49.2
Total expenses $23,351
 $29,164
 17.8 % 25.4 % (19.9)%
Income (loss) before income taxes $3,014
 $(9,361) 2.3 % (8.2)% 132.2 %
Income tax benefit (208) (3,379) (0.2) (2.9) 93.8
Net income (loss) $3,222
 $(5,982) 2.5 % (5.2)% 153.9 %
**Results of calculation are not considered meaningful for presentation purposes.


Third Quarter 20172019 Compared to Third Quarter 20162018 – Company Analysis
Net sales of $131,492$154,276 for the periodthree months ended September 30, 2017 increased2019 decreased by $16,848,$12,818, or 14.7%7.7%, compared to the prior year quarter. The changedecline was attributable to increasesreductions within our Rail Products and Services segment of 32.3%, 12.2%,19.8% and 9.1%, inour Tubular and Energy Services segment of 4.1%. These declines were partially offset by Construction Products and Rail Products and Services, respectively.sales increasing by 13.6%.


Gross profit decreased by $3,611 compared to the prior year quarter to $27,692 for the three months ended September 30, 2019. Gross profit margin for the quarterthree months ended September 30, 20172019 was 20.1%17.9%, or 28080 basis points (“bps”) higher, lower than the prior year quarter. EachThe decrease in gross profit margin was primarily due to reductions of the three segments contributed to the increase with gains of 1,830 bps, 290410 bps and 80100 bps inwithin Tubular and Energy Services and Construction Products, andrespectively. The decreases were partially offset by an increase in gross profit margin of 200 bps within Rail Products and Services, respectively.Services.


Selling and administrative expenses increased by $411$602, or 2.1% from2.8%, compared to the prior year.year quarter. The increaserise in expense was primarily driven by personnel related spendingincreases in third-party services and personnel-related expenses of $821, which$771, rental expense of $180, and bad debt expense of $171 when compared to the prior year quarter. The increase was partially offset by reduced litigation costsdecreases in legal expenses of $597 related to the Union Pacific Railroad ("UPRR") matterconcrete tie litigation. As a percent of $468.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded total non-cash asset impairments of $6,946 from goodwillsales, selling and definite-lived intangible assets.

Interest expense, net of interest income,administrative expenses increased by $500, or 34.0%, as a result of the increase in interest rates on outstanding debt. Other income decreased $534, or 49.2%, which primarily relates to losses on foreign exchange as the Canadian Dollar has strengthened140 bps compared to the United States Dollar versus the prior year period.quarter.


The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three-month periodthree months ended September 30, 20172019 was (6.9)%1.6%, compared to 36.1%0.3% in the prior year quarter. For the three months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company recorded a tax benefitprovision of $208,$51, compared to $3,379$18 in the
24

Table of Contents
three months ended September 30, 2016.2018. The Company's incomeeffective tax benefitrate for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was2019 differed from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily relateddue to changes in our estimated annual effective tax rate. The Company continued to maintainthe realization of a full valuation allowance againstportion of its U.S. deferred tax assets.assets previously offset by a valuation allowance.


Net income for the third quarter of 20172019 was $3,222,$3,064, or $0.31$0.29 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $5,982,$6,408, or $0.58$0.61 per diluted share, in the prior year quarter. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings1 per share value for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016
  (Unaudited)
Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Reconciliation    
Net income (loss), as reported $3,222
 $(5,982)
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $1,000 
 5,946
Adjusted net income (loss) $3,222
 $(36)
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted 10,479
 10,296
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share, as reported $0.31
 $(0.58)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share, as adjusted $0.31
 $(0.00)

1 All results in this Quarterly Report that exclude asset impairment charges are non-GAAP measures used for management reporting purposes. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors because they will assist investors in evaluating earnings performance on a comparable year-over-year basis.


Results of Operations – Segment Analysis
Rail Products and Services
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Increase/(Decrease)Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net sales$67,741  $84,517  $(16,776) (19.8)%
Gross profit$14,480  $16,416  $(1,936) (11.8)%
Gross profit percentage21.4 %19.4 %2.0 %10.1 %
Segment profit$3,417  $5,299  $(1,882) (35.5)%
Segment profit percentage5.0 %6.3 %(1.3)%(19.5)%
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Increase Percent
Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $62,095
 $56,891
 $5,204
 9.1%
Segment Profit (Loss) $3,472
 $(2,047) $5,519
 269.6%
Segment Profit (Loss) Percentage 5.6% (3.6)% 9.2% 255.6%


Third Quarter 20172019 Compared to Third Quarter 2016
Rail Products and Services segment sales increased by $5,204, or 9.1%, compared to the prior year period. The sales increase was primarily driven domestically by a $3,037 increase in our distribution business, which experienced increased demand as overall tonnage sold increased compared to the prior period, and Allegheny Rail Products, which increased by $2,017, following a 76% demand increase from Class 1 railroads.

2018
The Rail Products and Services segment profit increasedsales decreased by $5,519$16,776, or 19.8%, compared to 5.6%the prior year quarter. The sales decline was driven by volume in our Rail Products business resulting in a decrease of net sales. The increase$10,010, primarily from our new rail and concrete tie products due to the timing of transit projects. Partially offsetting the decline within Rail Products were sales increases in our insulated joint offerings. Also contributing to the segment sales decline was a reduction of $6,766 in our Rail Technologies business, primarily attributable to 2016 impairment charges of $4,383 related toreduced service activity levels from the London Crossrail project as it nears completion.

The Rail Products and Services gross profit decreased by $1,936, or 11.8%, from the prior year quarter. The decrease was primarily driven by the volume decline in our Rail Products business, which had lower new rail shipments, and our Rail Technologies goodwill. Non-GAAPbusiness, which had a reduction in services provided for the London Crossrail project. Segment gross profit increased $1,597, or 13.1%,margin grew by 200 bps as a result of the increased domestic distribution volumes.product mix contribution from our higher margin manufactured and service-based offerings. Segment profit was $3,417, a $1,882 decline over the prior year quarter. Selling, general, and administrative expenses incurred by the segment were flat to the prior year quarter.


During the current quarter, the Rail Products and Services segment had an increasea decrease in new orders of 44.5%3.0% compared to the prior year period, while backlogperiod. The decrease was $85,764 at September 30, 2017, an increase of 60.6%, comparedprimarily related to $53,392 at September 30, 2016. The Company is encouraged by continuing positive trends signaling a recovering freight rail market in North Americaactivity within our global transit projects and strength in the transit system projects globally.concrete tie products.


Construction Products
Three Months Ended
September 30,
Increase/(Decrease)Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net sales$47,175  $41,534  $5,641  13.6 %
Gross profit$6,097  $5,770  $327  5.7 %
Gross profit percentage12.9 %13.9 %(1.0)%(7.0)%
Segment profit$1,848  $1,603  $245  15.3 %
Segment profit percentage3.9 %3.9 %— %1.5 %
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Increase Percent
Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $39,118
 $34,870
 $4,248
 12.2%
Segment Profit $3,387
 $1,356
 $2,031
 149.8%
Segment Profit Percentage 8.7% 3.9% 4.8% 123.1%


Third Quarter 20172019 Compared to Third Quarter 20162018
The Construction Products segment sales increased by $4,248,$5,641, or 12.2%13.6%, compared to the prior year period. Fabricated Bridge andquarter. The growth was attributable to volume increases in both Precast Concrete Products businesses increased by $4,411 and $1,185, respectively.Piling and Fabricated Bridge, generated favorableresulting in sales in the current quarter due to bridge form projects as well as the continuationincreases of the Peace Bridge project.$3,736 and $1,905, respectively. Our Precast Concrete Products business unit was favorably impacted by increasedconcrete building sales and installations as well as increased demand in septic tank and reinforced earth panel offerings. Piling continued product fulfillment during the current quarter, attributable to state agencies. These increases werethe Port Everglades project, while Fabricated Bridge experienced increased volume within its steel decking and railing product lines.

The Construction Products gross profit increased by $327, or 5.7%, over the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily attributable to the sales volume growth and manufacturing efficiencies within our Precast Concrete Products division and volume and favorable product mix within Fabricated Bridge. The increase was partially offset by a reduction in Piling salesgross profit. Segment profit increased
25

Table of $1,348, primarily relatedContents
by $245 over the prior year quarter to lower sheet piling volumes.

The Construction Products segment profit increased by $2,031 to 8.7%3.9% of net sales. The increase was primarily volume related, improved manufacturing efficiencies, and to a lesser extent, reduced sellingSelling and administrative expenses incurred by the segment were flat over the prior year quarter; however, the expenses were reduced by 110 bps as a percentage of $163, or 3.4%. Non-GAAP gross profit increased by $1,868, or 30.2%, which was a result of volume increases and manufacturing efficiencies reducing costs.segment sales compared to the prior year quarter.


During the quarter, the Construction Products segment had a decrease in new orders of 11.1%38.7% compared to the prior year quarter, which was primarily related to the Port Everglades project that was booked in the prior year quarter within Piling and, to a lesser extent, Precast Concrete Products division.

Tubular and Energy Services
Three Months Ended
September 30,
DecreasePercent
Decrease
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net sales$39,360  $41,043  $(1,683) (4.1)%
Gross profit$7,115  $9,117  $(2,002) (22.0)%
Gross profit percentage18.1 %22.2 %(4.1)%(18.6)%
Segment profit$2,230  $4,274  $(2,044) (47.8)%
Segment profit percentage5.7 %10.4 %(4.7)%(45.6)%

Third Quarter 2019 Compared to Third Quarter 2018
Tubular and Energy Services segment sales decreased by $1,683, or 4.1%, compared to the prior year period. The decrease related to a 47.8% reduction Piling orderswas primarily due to lower sheet piling demand. Thisweakened conditions in the served upstream market that reduced drilling activity in the U.S. and negatively impacted demand for our testing and inspection services. The decline was partially offset by increased new orders of 228.9%increases within our midstream products and 10.7% for our Fabricated Bridge and Precast Concrete Products businesses, respectively. Ending backlog in the Construction segment decreased by 1.1% to $74,910 from the prior year period.services.

Tubular and Energy Services
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Increase Percent
Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $30,279
 $22,883
 $7,396
 32.3%
Segment Profit (Loss) $2,298
 $(6,966) $9,264
 133.0%
Segment Profit (Loss) Percentage 7.6% (30.4)% 38.0% 125.0%

Third Quarter 2017 Compared to Third Quarter 2016
Tubular and Energy Services segment sales increasedgross profit decreased by $7,396,$2,002, or 32.3%22.0%, comparedwhich was primarily attributable to the prior year period. The increase related to strong bookings from Protective Coatingsreduced volumes within our Test, Inspection, and Test and InspectionThreading Services businesses, partially offset by a decrease in Precision Measurement Systems sales. The quarter showed continued improvement within the upstream oil and gas market. Sales in the Precision Measurement Systems business are below prior year, although order input was very strong in the quarter as backlog is now 99.7% above prior year levels.

Tubular and Energy Services segment profit increased by $9,264, or 133.0%, compared to the prior year quarter. The quarter was favorably impacted by non-GAAPunit. Segment gross profit of $5,767margin decreased by 410 bps over the prior year period, with increases from each divisionquarter, which was primarily driven by reduced volume within the segment. TheTest, Inspection, and Threading Services business. Segment profit decreased by $2,044, or 47.8%, over the prior year was negatively affected by impairment charges of $2,563 for the three months ended September 30, 2016.quarter.


The Tubular and Energy Services segment had an increasea decrease of 24.0% in new orders of 97.1% compared to the prior year period. Orders for Precisionquarter. Our Protective Coatings and Measurement Systems business unit new orders were negatively impacted during the current quarter due to delays in anticipated projects. The Test, Inspection, and InspectionThreading Services and Protective Coatings increased 147.1%, 129.6%, and 89.2%, respectively. The upstream oil and gas market continues to show signs of recovery. We continue to be encouragedbusiness decline was driven by increased order activityreduced demand from unfavorable conditions in the midstreamupstream market as well.we serve.

On July 31, 2017, the lease at our Birmingham, Alabama facility expired. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company negotiated a lease renewal for this facility. The renewal is for a term
26

Table of five years and is scheduled to expire July 31, 2022.Contents

Year-to-DateNine Month Results
The segment gross profit measures presented within the MD&A tables constitute non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by management to provide investors and other users information to evaluate the performance of the Company’s segments on a more comparable basis to market trends and peers. The exclusion of significant cost allocations to the reportable segments:
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent of Total Net Sales
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Net Sales:
Rail Products and Services$244,836  $238,571  2.6 %48.4 %51.6 %
Construction Products139,926  112,641  24.2  27.7  24.4  
Tubular and Energy Services120,916  111,226  8.7  23.9  24.0  
Total net sales$505,678  $462,438  9.4 %100.0 %100.0 %
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Gross Profit Percentage
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Gross Profit:
Rail Products and Services$47,647  $44,733  6.5 %19.5 %18.8 %
Construction Products19,564  16,844  16.1  14.0  15.0  
Tubular and Energy Services26,771  24,981  7.2  22.1  22.5  
Total gross profit$93,982  $86,558  8.6 %18.6 %18.7 %
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
Percent of Total Net Sales
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
201920182019 vs. 201820192018
Expenses:
Selling and administrative expenses$67,036  $65,488  2.4 %13.3 %14.2 %
Amortization expense5,046  5,322  (5.2) 1.0  1.2  
Interest expense - net4,031  4,813  (16.2) 0.8  1.0  
Other income - net(823) (320) 157.2  (0.2) (0.1) 
Total expenses$75,290  $75,303  (0.0)%14.9 %16.3 %
Income before income taxes$18,692  $11,255  66.1 %3.7 %2.4 %
Income tax expense2,374  1,271  86.8  0.5  0.3  
Net income$16,318  $9,984  63.4 %3.2 %2.2 %


Allows users to understand the operational performance of our reportable segments;
Provides greater comparability to other registrants with similar businesses and avoids possible non-comparability at the reportable segment pre-tax profit level resulting from our specific corporate cost allocations; and
Facilitates a clearer, market-based perspective on the strength or weakness of our reportable segments in their markets to better aid in investment decisions.

In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures have historically been key metrics utilized by segment managers to monitor selling prices and quantities as well as production and service costs to better evaluate key profitability drivers and trends that may develop due to industry and competitive conditions.
Nine months ended September 30, 2017 Rail Products and
Services
 Construction
Products
 Tubular and Energy
Services
 Total
Reportable Segment Profit $8,938
 $9,156
 $1,774
 $19,868
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative 27,355
 13,835
 11,711
 52,901
Amortization Expense 2,747
 113
 2,358
 5,218
Asset Impairments 
 
 
 
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit $39,040
 $23,104
 $15,843
 $77,987
         
Nine months ended September 30, 2016 Rail Products and
Services
 Construction
Products
 Tubular and Energy
Services
 Total
Reportable Segment (Loss) Profit $(26,474) $5,748
 $(111,876) $(132,602)
Segment and Allocated Selling & Administrative 31,854
 14,781
 12,891
 59,526
Amortization Expense 2,946
 113
 4,759
 7,818
Asset Impairments 32,725
 
 103,159
 135,884
Non-GAAP Segment Gross Profit $41,051
 $20,642
 $8,933
 $70,626

      Percent of Total Net Sales  
  Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
  September 30, September 30, 
  
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales:          
Rail Products and Services $187,922
 $188,686
 47.6 % 50.1 % (0.4)%
Construction Products 121,905
 107,098
 30.9
 28.4
 13.8
Tubular and Energy Services 85,227
 81,164
 21.5
 21.5
 5.0
Total net sales $395,054
 $376,948
 100.0 % 100.0 % 4.8 %
           
      Non-GAAP / Reported
Gross Profit Percentage
 Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
  Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, September 30, 
  
 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Gross Profit:          
Non-GAAP Rail Products and Services $39,040
 $41,051
 20.8 % 21.8 % (4.9)%
Non-GAAP Construction Products 23,104
 20,642
 19.0
 19.3
 11.9
Non-GAAP Tubular and Energy Services 15,843
 8,933
 18.6
 11.0
 77.4
Non-GAAP Segment gross profit 77,987
 70,626
      
LIFO (expense) income (1,733) 1,442
 (0.4) 0.4
 (220.2)
Other (901) (492) (0.2) (0.1) 83.1
Total gross profit $75,353
 $71,576
 19.1 % 19.0 % 5.3 %
        Percent
Increase/
(Decrease)
      Percent of Total Net Sales 
  Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended 
  September 30, September 30, 
  2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Expenses:          
Selling and administrative expenses $60,023
 $65,941
 15.2 % 17.5 % (9.0)%
Amortization expense 5,218
 7,818
 1.3
 2.1
 (33.3)
Asset impairments 
 135,884
 
 36.0
 (100.0)
Interest expense 6,315
 4,342
 1.6
 1.2
 45.4
Interest income (166) (157) 
 
 5.7
Equity in loss of nonconsolidated investments 5
 946
 
 0.3
 (99.5)
Other income (564) (263) (0.1) (0.1) 114.4
Total expenses $70,831
 $214,511
 17.9 % 56.9 % (67.0)%
Income (loss) before income taxes $4,522
 $(142,935) 1.1 % (37.9)% 103.2 %
Income tax expense (benefit) 698
 (42,125) 0.2
 (11.2) 101.7
Net income (loss) $3,824
 $(100,810) 1.0 % (26.7)% 103.8 %


First Nine Months of 20172019 Compared to First Nine Months of 20162018 – Company Analysis
Net sales of $395,054$505,678 for the periodnine months ended September 30, 20172019 increased by $18,106,$43,240, or 4.8%9.4%, compared to the prior year period. The change was attributable to increases within each of 13.8% and 5.0% in theour three segments. Construction Products andsales increased by 24.2%, Tubular and Energy Services segments, respectively. This increase was partially offsetsales increased by a decrease of 0.4% in the8.7%, and Rail Products and Services segment.sales increased by 2.6%.


Gross profit increased by $7,424 compared to the prior year period to $93,982 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 was 19.1%18.6%, or 10 bps higherlower than the prior year period. The decline in gross profit margin was primarily due to decreases of 100 bps and 40 bps within Construction Products and Tubular and Energy Services, respectively. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in gross profit margin of 70 bps within the Construction Products segment.

Selling and administrative expenses increased by $1,548 or 2.4% from the prior year. The escalation was primarily driven by increases in third-party services of $2,060, personnel-related expenses of $1,933, and bad debt of $994 when compared to the prior year period. The increase was due to a 760 bps improvement within the Tubular and Energy Services segment. The increase was partially offset by reductionsa reduction in legal expenses related to the Union Pacific Railroad concrete tie litigation of 100 bps and 30 bps, in Rail Products and Services and Construction Products, respectively.

Selling$4,165. As a percent of sales, selling and administrative expenses decreaseddeclined by $5,918 or 9.0% from90 bps compared to the prior year. All three segments experienced decreases which were primarily driven by personnel and discretionary spending reductions of $4,021 and reduced litigation costs related to the UPRR matter of $1,419.year period.

Amortization decreased $2,600, or 33.3%, as a result of the June 1, 2016 interim intangible asset impairment test, which was finalized during the three months ended September 30, 2016, resulting in a $59,786 impairment of definite-lived intangible assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded total non-cash asset impairments of $135,884 from goodwill, definite-lived intangible assets, and property, plant, and equipment.


Interest expense, net of interest income, increaseddecreased by $1,964,$782, or 46.9%16.2%, as a result of the increasereduction in interest rates on outstanding debt. Other income increased by $301, or 114.4%, which primarily relateddebt compared to the gain on the saleprior year period.
27

Table of certain assets, which was partially offset by the impact of a weaker United States Dollar relative to the Canadian Dollar in the nine months ended September 30, 2017.Contents

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 was 15.4%12.7%, compared to 29.5%11.3% in the prior year period. For the first nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company recorded a tax provision of $698,$2,374, compared to a tax benefit of $42,125$1,271 in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. 2018. The Company’sCompany's effective tax provisionrate for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was2019 differed from the federal statutory rate of 21% primarily compriseddue to the realization of taxes on our Canadian and United Kingdom operations. The Company continued to maintain a full valuation allowance againstportion of its U.S. deferred tax assets.assets previously offset by a valuation allowance.


Net income for the first nine months of 2017ended September 30, 2018 was $3,824,$16,318, or $0.37$1.53 per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $100,810,$9,984, or $9.82$0.95 per diluted share, in the prior year period. The following table provides a reconciliation of the GAAP earnings per share value to the non-GAAP adjusted earnings1 per share value for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  2017 2016
  (Unaudited)
Adjusted Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share Reconciliation    
Net income (loss), as reported $3,824
 $(100,810)
Asset impairments, net of tax benefits of $39,038 
 96,846
Adjusted net income (loss) $3,824
 $(3,964)
Average number of common shares outstanding - Diluted 10,435
 10,264
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share, as reported $0.37
 $(9.82)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share, as adjusted $0.37
 $(0.39)

1 All results in this Quarterly Report that exclude asset impairment charges are non-GAAP measures used for management reporting purposes. Management believes that these measures provide useful information to investors because they will assist investors in evaluating earnings performance on a comparable year-over-year basis.


Results of Operations – Segment Analysis
Rail Products and Services
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
IncreasePercent
Increase
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net sales$244,836  $238,571  $6,265  2.6 %
Gross profit$47,647  $44,733  $2,914  6.5 %
Gross profit percentage19.5 %18.8 %0.7 %3.8 %
Segment profit$14,815  $12,655  $2,160  17.1 %
Segment profit percentage6.1 %5.3 %0.8 %14.1 %
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 (Decrease)/Increase Percent
(Decrease)/Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $187,922
 $188,686
 $(764) (0.4)%
Segment Profit (Loss) $8,938
 $(26,474) $35,412
 133.8 %
Segment Profit (Loss) Percentage 4.8% (14.0)% 18.8% 134.3 %


First Nine Months of 20172019 Compared to First Nine Months of 20162018
The Rail Products and Services segment sales decreased $764,increased by $6,265, or 0.4%2.6%, compared to the prior year period. The reductionsales growth was driven by our Rail Products business unit which increased by $13,820. The Rail Products growth was primarily attributable to domestic transit projects and, to a lesser extent, new rail and insulated joint products. Partially offsetting the increase was a decline in sales is primarily related to a decrease in our domestic businesseswithin the European transit market as we approach the completion of $5,956,the London Crossrail project.

The Rail Products and Services gross profit increased by $2,914, or 4.3%.6.5%, over the prior year period. The sales declines were primarily volumeincrease was driven by volume growth in Rail Products. Segment gross profit margin increased by 70 bps as a result of the domestic freight rail and transit markets. Our domestic rail distribution businessincreased contribution from higher margin product mix within Rail Products. Segment profit was unfavorably impacted by both volume and pricing$14,815, a $2,160 increase compared to the prior year period. The sales decrease was partially offsetSelling and administrative expenses incurred by sales increases in our foreign divisions of $5,192, or 10.6%, as we saw favorable results in both our Canadian and European markets.

The Rail Products and Servicesthe segment profit increased by $35,412 to 4.8% of net sales. The increase was primarily attributable to a reduction in selling, administrative, and allocated expenses of $4,430, or 13.9%, and$685 over the 2016 impairment charges of $32,725 related to Rail Technologies goodwill. This was partially offset by a decline in non-GAAP gross profit of $2,011, or 4.9%, which was primarily related to volume reductions and product mix within domestic transit products, as well as service related cost increases in our domestic Rail Technologies business.prior year period.


During the current year, the Rail Products and Services segment had an increasea decrease in new orders of 28.9%13.6% compared to the prior year period. The increase impacted eachBacklog was $88,051 as of the three business units within the segment and grew the backlog balance to $85,764 at September 30, 2017,2019, a 60.6% increase overdecrease of 19.1%, compared to $108,840 as of September 30, 2018. The decreases were primarily related to activity within our new rail distribution products, concrete ties, and activity levels on the prior year. The Company is also encouraged by positive signs from order activity and resulting backlog during the first nine months of 2017.London Crossrail project.


Construction Products
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Increase/(Decrease)Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net sales$139,926  $112,641  $27,285  24.2 %
Gross profit$19,564  $16,844  $2,720  16.1 %
Gross profit percentage14.0 %15.0 %(1.0)%(6.5)%
Segment profit$6,095  $4,478  $1,617  36.1 %
Segment profit percentage4.4 %4.0 %0.4 %9.6 %
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 Increase Percent
Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $121,905
 $107,098
 $14,807
 13.8%
Segment Profit $9,156
 $5,748
 $3,408
 59.3%
Segment Profit Percentage 7.5% 5.4% 2.1% 38.9%


First Nine Months of 20172019 Compared to First Nine Months of 20162018
The Construction Products segment sales increased by $14,807,$27,285, or 13.8%24.2%, compared to the prior year period. The increase relatedwas attributable to Fabricated Bridge andgrowth within each of the businesses within the segment. Piling businesses of $9,428 and $7,112, respectively. Fabricated Bridge continued to have favorable sales involume increased considerably during the current year due to several projects, includingas the continuationPort Everglades order was fulfilled, while Fabricated Bridge experienced increased sales volume within its steel decking and railing product lines which resulted in an increase of the Peace Bridge project. The increase in Piling was primarily due to demand within the sheet piling product line. These increases were offset by a reduction in$18,518. Our Precast Concrete Products business unit was favorably impacted by concrete building sales, of $1,733.most significantly in our southern U.S. region.


The Construction Products segmentgross profit increased by $3,408$2,720, or 16.1%, over the prior year period. The increase was primarily attributable to 7.5%the sales volume growth in both business units within the segment. Segment profit increased by $1,617 over the prior year period to 4.4% of net sales. The increase related to reductions in selling,Selling and administrative and allocated expenses incurred by the segment increased by $1,113 over the prior year period; however, the expenses as a percentage of $947, or 6.4%. Non-GAAP gross profit increased $2,462, or 11.9%, which was primarily duesegment sales were reduced by 130 bps compared to the increased volumes from the Fabricated Bridge and Piling businesses within theprior year period.

28

Table of Contents
During the period,first nine months of 2019, the Construction Products segment had a decrease in new orders of 8.7%17.4% compared to the prior year period, which was primarily related to the Port Everglades project recorded in the 2018 period. Prior year Fabricated Bridge orders included the $15,000 Peace Bridge project. Piling saw a 6.3% reductionThe decline in new orders compared towas partially offset by a 7.5% increase in orders in Precast Concrete Products. The decrease in new orders resulted in segment backlog of $86,626 as of September 30, 2019, a 26.4% decrease from the prior year from recent declines in sheet piling demand. The Precast Concrete Products business saw an increase in new orders of 10.7% primarily from building orders from state agencies. The Construction Products segment had backlog at September 30, 2017 of $74,910, a 1.1% decrease over the prior year.period.


Tubular and Energy Services
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Increase/(Decrease)Percent
Increase/(Decrease)
201920182019 vs. 20182019 vs. 2018
Net Sales$120,916  $111,226  $9,690  8.7 %
Gross profit$26,771  $24,981  $1,790  7.2 %
Gross profit percentage22.1 %22.5 %(0.4)%(1.4)%
Segment profit$11,937  $10,704  $1,233  11.5 %
Segment profit percentage9.9 %9.6 %0.3 %2.6 %
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 Increase Percent
Increase
  2017 2016 2017 vs. 2016 2017 vs. 2016
Net Sales $85,227
 $81,164
 $4,063
 5.0%
Segment Profit (Loss) $1,774
 $(111,876) $113,650
 101.6%
Segment Profit (Loss) Percentage 2.1% (137.8)% 139.9% 101.5%


First Nine Months of 20172019 Compared to First Nine Months of 20162018
Tubular and Energy Services segment sales increased $4,063,by $9,690, or 5.0%8.7%, compared to the prior year period. The increase relatedwas due to significant growth from TestProtective Coatings and Inspection Services and Protective Coating businesses, partially offsetMeasurement Systems when compared to the prior year period. This was additionally supported by a decrease in Precision Measurement Systems. The period showed increased new well count and demandstrong orders within the upstream oil and gasmidstream market but was negatively impacted by a lag induring the recovery of Precision Measurement Systems for midstream applications.current year.


Tubular and Energy Services segment gross profit increasesincreased $1,790, or 7.2%, which was supported by $113,650,the sales growth in Protective Coatings and Measurement Systems. Segment gross profit margin declined by 40 bps over the prior year period, which was primarily driven by volume in the 2019 period within the Test, Inspection, and Threading Services business. Segment profit increased by $1,233, or 101.6%11.5%, over the prior year period. Selling and administrative expense increased by $1,425 during the first nine months of 2019 when compared to the prior year period. The period, which was favorably impacteddriven by a reduction in amortization expense of $2,401 from the 2016 definite-lived intangible asset impairment. The prior period was also negatively affected by impairment charges of $103,159 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Segment profit was also favorably impacted by a non-GAAP gross profit increase of $6,910, or 77.4%.increased personnel-related and bad debt expenses.


The Tubular and Energy Services segment had an increase of 4.5% in new orders of 47.6% compared to the prior year period. Orders for Protective Coatings and Test and Inspection Services businessesMeasurement Systems increased by 151.2%16.5%, which was partially offset by a reduction in Test, Inspection, and 107.5%, respectively.Threading Services of 12.3%. The upstream oil and gas market continued its recovery. We are also encouraged by positive trends in midstream order activitysegment had a backlog as we ended the nine-month period.

On July 31, 2017, the lease at our Birmingham, Alabama facility expired. During the third quarter endedof September 30, 2017,2019 of $19,406, a 22.8% decrease when compared to the Company negotiated a lease renewal for this facility. The renewal is for a term of five years and is scheduled to expire July 31, 2022.prior year.


Other
Segment Backlog
Total Company backlog is summarized by business segment in the following table for the periods indicated:
September 30,
2019
December 31,
2018
September 30,
2018
Rail Products and Services$88,051  $97,447  $108,840  
Construction Products86,626  95,419  117,654  
Tubular and Energy Services19,406  27,552  25,123  
Total backlog$194,083  $220,418  $251,617  
  Backlog
  September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 September 30,
2016
Rail Products and Services $85,764
 $62,743
 $53,392
Construction Products 74,910
 71,954
 75,762
Tubular and Energy Services 28,931
 12,759
 14,650
Total Backlog $189,605
 $147,456
 $143,804


While a considerable portion of our business is backlog-driven, certain product lines within the Rail Products and Services and Tubular and Energy Services segments are not driven by backlog and therefore have insignificant levels throughout the year.backlog.

Warranty
As of September 30, 2017, the Company maintained a total product warranty reserve of $9,614 for its estimate of all potential product warranty claims. Of this total, $7,607 reflects the current estimate of the Company’s exposure for potential concrete tie warranty claims. While the Company believes this is a reasonable estimate of its potential exposure related to identified concrete tie warranty matters, the Company may incur future charges associated with new customer claims or further development of information of existing customer claims. Thus, there can be no assurance that future potential costs pertaining to warranty claims will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 13 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Total debt was $138,285$72,999 and $159,565$74,982 as of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively, and was primarily comprised of borrowings onunder our revolving credit facility and term loan.

facility. Our need for liquidity relates primarily to working capital requirements for operations, capital expenditures, joint venture capital obligations,and debt service obligations, and share repurchases as authorized by the Boardobligations.








29

Table of Directors and as permitted under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015.Contents

The change in cash and cash equivalents for the periodsnine months ended September 30, are2019 and 2018 is as follows:
September 30,
20192018
Net cash provided by operating activities$13,283  $22,425  
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(4,784) 4,181  
Net cash used in financing activities(3,419) (53,813) 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents12  (885) 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$5,092  $(28,092) 
  September 30,
  2017 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities $27,516
 $11,876
Net cash used by investing activities (3,947) (6,219)
Net cash used by financing activities (21,384) (35,470)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2,460
 152
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $4,645
 $(29,661)


Cash Flow from Operating Activities
During the current 2017 nine-month period,nine months ended September 30, 2019, cash flows provided by operating activities were $27,516$13,283, compared to $11,876operations providing $22,425 during the prior year period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, income and adjustments to income from operating activities provided $18,985$31,995, compared to $15,976$25,857 in the 20162018 period. Working capital and other assets and liabilities provided $8,531used $18,712 in the current period, compared to a use of $4,100$3,432 in the prior year period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company received $9,946 and $1,827 from our 2016 and 2015 federal income tax refunds, respectively.made payments totaling $6,000 under the terms of the concrete tie settlement agreement with Union Pacific Railroad.


The Company’s calculation for days sales outstanding at September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2018 was 50 days, compared to 53 days at December 31, 2017, and we believe our receivables portfolio is strong.


Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018 were $5,335$5,037 and $6,507,$3,196, respectively. The current year expenditures relate to trackside rail lubricator units installedplant expansion and automation integration programs within our Tubular and Energy Services segment, as part of a new multi-year service contract andwell as general plant and operational improvements.improvements throughout the Company. Expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 20162018 related to the Birmingham, AL inside diameter coating line upgradeexpenditures for general plant and application development ofoperational improvements. During the Company’s new enterprise resource planning system. During nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company received $1,388$253 in proceeds from the sale of certain property, plant, and equipment, as compared to $923$2,267 in the prior year period. The Company also loaned $635 to our joint venture, L B Pipe & Coupling Products, LLC (“L B Pipe JV”), asreceived $3,875 and $1,235 in proceeds from the sale of an equity investment and repayment of a line of a credit, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.2018.


Cash Flow from Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of $21,281,$1,983, primarily related to the reduction of working capital for operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of $53,497, primarily related to payments against the revolving credit facility, as well aswhich was facilitated by the applicationrepatriation of $31,517 in excess cash from our international locations. The Company paid $836 in debt issuance costs in connection with the $9,946 federal income tax refund and quarterly principle payments against the term loan. DuringApril 30, 2019 credit facility amendment during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company had a decrease in outstanding debt of $33,125, primarily related to payments against the revolving credit facility.2019. Treasury stock acquisitions represent income tax withholdings from employees in connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards. Cash outflows related to dividends were $1,244 for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2016.


Financial Condition
As of September 30, 2017,2019, we had $35,008$15,374 in cash and cash equivalents and a domestic credit facility with $46,081$91,160 of net availability, while we had $138,285$72,999 in total debt. We believe this liquidity will provide the flexibility to operate the business in a prudent manner and enable us to continue to service our revolving credit facility and term loan.facility.


Our cash management priority continues to be short-term maturities and the preservation of our principal balances. Approximately $33,976As of September 30, 2019, approximately $11,290 of our cash and cash equivalents was held in non-domestic bank accounts, and, under current law, the foreign cash would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes less applicable foreign tax credits upon repatriation.accounts.

On November 7, 2016, the Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of its Canadian subsidiaries entered into the Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015 and as amended by the First Amendment dated June 29, 2016 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”), with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, and Branch Banking and Trust Company. This Second Amendment modified the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, which had a maximum revolving credit line of $275,000.

The Second Amendment reduced the permitted revolving credit borrowings to $195,000 and provided for additional term loan borrowings of $30,000 (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan is subject to quarterly straight line amortization until fully paid off upon the final payment on January 1, 2020. Furthermore, certain matters, including excess cash flow, asset sales, and equity issuances, trigger mandatory prepayments to the Term Loan. Term Loan borrowings are not available to draw upon once they have been repaid. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Second Amendment or Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, as applicable.

The Second Amendment further provided for modifications to the financial covenants as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment calls for the elimination of the Maximum Leverage Ratio covenant through the quarter ending June 30, 2018. After that period, the Maximum Gross Leverage Ratio covenant will be reinstated to require a maximum ratio of 4.25 Consolidated Indebtedness to 1.00 Gross Leverage for the quarter ending September 30, 2018, and 3.75 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter until the maturity date of the credit facility. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Last Twelve Months EBITDA (as defined by the Amendment) covenant (“Minimum EBITDA”). For the quarter ended December 31, 2016 through the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Minimum EBITDA must be at least $18,500. For each quarter thereafter, through the quarter ending June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will increase by various increments. The incremental Minimum EBITDA requirement for the period ending September 30, 2017 must be at least $23,000. During the third quarter ended September 30, 2017, the rolling 12-month EBITDA calculation, as defined by the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, was $32,063. At June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA requirement will be $31,000. After the quarter ending June 30, 2018, the Minimum EBITDA covenant will be eliminated through the maturity of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment also includes a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio covenant. The covenant represents the ratio of the Company’s fixed charges to the last twelve months of EBITDA, and is required to be a minimum of 1.00 to 1.00 through the quarter ending December 31, 2017 and 1.25 to 1.00 for each quarter thereafter through the maturity of the credit facility. The final financial covenant included in the Second Amendment is a Minimum Liquidity covenant which calls for a minimum of $25,000 in undrawn availability on the revolving credit loan at all times through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

The Second Amendment includes several changes to certain non-financial covenants, as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Through the maturity date of the loan, the Company is now prohibited from making any future acquisitions. The limitation on permitted annual distributions of dividends or redemptions of the Company’s stock was decreased from $4,000 to $1,700. The aggregate limitation on loans to and investments in non-loan parties was decreased from $10,000 to $5,000. Furthermore, the limitation on asset sales has been decreased from $25,000 annually with a carryover of up to $15,000 from the prior year to $25,000 in the aggregate through the maturity date of the credit facility.

The Second Amendment provided for the elimination of the three lowest tiers of the pricing grid that had previously been defined in the First Amendment. Upon execution of the Second Amendment through the quarter ending March 31, 2018, the Company will be locked into the highest tier of the pricing grid, which provides for pricing of the prime rate plus 225 basis points on base rate loans and the applicable LIBOR rate plus 325 basis points on euro rate loans. For each quarter after March 31, 2018 and through the maturity date of the credit facility, the Company’s position on the pricing grid will be governed by a Minimum Net Leverage ratio, which is the ratio of Consolidated Indebtedness less cash on hand in excess of $15,000 to EBITDA. If, after March 31, 2018, the Minimum Net Leverage ratio positions the Company on the lowest tier of the pricing grid, pricing will be the prime rate plus 150 basis points on base rate loans or the applicable LIBOR rate plus 250 basis points on euro rate loans.


To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on outstanding variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting LIBOR-based interest rate swaps with notional values totaling $50,000. The swaps became effective on February 28, 2017, at which point they effectively convertconverted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowings during the term of the swap contract. AtAs of September 30, 2017,2019, the swap liability was $323$657 compared to $334an asset of $675 as of December 31, 2016.2018.


Cost in ExcessOn April 30, 2019, the Company, its domestic subsidiaries, and certain of Net Assets Acquired
At Septemberits Canadian and European subsidiaries (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered into the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“Amended Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citizens Bank, N.A., and BMO Harris Bank, N.A. This Amended Credit Agreement modifies the prior revolving credit facility, which had a maximum credit line of $195,000, and extends the maturity date from March 13, 2020 to April 30, 2017, L.B. Foster had $19,6992024. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a five-year, revolving credit facility that permits aggregate borrowings of goodwill on its consolidated balance sheet. Of the total, $14,552 relatedBorrowers up to $140,000 with a sublimit of the equivalent of $25,000 U.S. dollars that is available to the Rail ProductsCanadian and Services segmentUnited Kingdom borrowers in the aggregate. The Amended Credit Agreement’s incremental loan feature permits the Company to increase the available revolving borrowings under the facility by up to an additional $50,000 and $5,147 relatedprovides for additional term loan
30

borrowings of up to $25,000 subject to the Construction Products segment. Goodwill is reviewed annually inCompany’s receipt of increased commitments from existing or new lenders and the fourth quartersatisfaction of each year for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. The Company recordedcertain conditions.

For a $32,725 partial goodwill impairment related to the Rail Products and Services segment during the year ended December 31, 2016. Based on considerations of current year financial results, including consideration of macroeconomic conditions, such as performancediscussion of the Company’s stock price, we do not believe that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair values of these reporting units have decreased below their carrying values at September 30, 2017. Consequently, management concluded that noneterms and availability of the Company’s reporting units experienced any triggering event that would have required a step one interim goodwill impairment analysis at September 30, 2017. However,Company's credit facilities, please refer to Note 9 of the previously recorded partial impairment included assumptions for certain market recoveries throughout the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2018, if these recoveries do not fully develop, the Rail Products and Services segment may require an incremental goodwill impairment.Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Critical Accounting Policies
The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When more than one accounting principle, or method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that, in its opinion, is appropriate in the Company’s specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires management to reach opinions regarding estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements, management has reached its opinions regarding the best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the financial statements giving due regard to materiality. ThereWe have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accountingupdated our lease policies or estimates since December 31, 2016.2018, in conjunction with our adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”), as further described in Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. A summary of the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements include operating leases, purchase obligations and standby letters of credit. A schedule of the Company’s required payments under financial instruments and other commitments as of December 31, 20162018 is included in the “LiquidityItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources” sectionResources -Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the provisions under ASC 842. As a result of the adoption, operating leases that were previously off-balance sheet arrangements are now recognized as right-of-use assets and liabilities within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. There were no other material changes to these off-balance sheet arrangements during the current quarter. These arrangements provide the Company with increased flexibility relative to the utilization and investment of cash resources.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The CompanyThis item is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into forward starting interest rate swap agreements which effectively convert a portion of the debt from a variablenot applicable to a fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contracts. See Note 9 Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.smaller reporting company.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt as of September 30, 2017 would increase or decrease interest expense by approximately $1,069.

The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. It does enter into interest rate hedges to reduce the risk in the variability of interest rate fluctuations. At contract inception, the Company designates its derivative instruments as hedges. The Company recognizes all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Fluctuations in the fair values of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings within other income as the underlying hedged items affect earnings. To the extent that a change in a derivative does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the interest rate being hedged, the ineffective portion is recognized in earnings immediately.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a current liability of $323 and $334, respectively, related to its LIBOR-based interest rate swap agreements.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The Company is subject to exposures to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company may manage its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on firm sale and purchase commitments by entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The Company’s risk management objective is to reduce its exposure to the effects of changes in exchange rates on these transactions over the duration of the transactions. The Company did not engage in foreign currency hedging transactions during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
L.B. Foster Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2017.2019. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, or person performing such functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the standards of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”). The adoption of ASC 842 required the Company to implement changes to our processes related to operating lease recognition and the control activities within them. This included the development of new policies and procedures, ongoing lease review and evaluation processes, and implementation of processes to obtain information responsive to the new disclosure requirements. There were no other changes into our “internal control over financial reporting” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)" will have on our internal control over financial reporting at the January 1, 2018 adoption date.


Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

31

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 13 Commitments and Contingent Liabilities14 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. You should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC on March 8, 2017, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, financial results, or future performance. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q areThis item is not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known or that we currently deemapplicable to be immaterial may also materially affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations.a smaller reporting company.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Company’s purchases of equity securities for the three months ended September 30, 20172019 were as follows:
Total number of shares purchased (1)Average price paid per shareTotal number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programsApproximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2019 - July 31, 2019—  $—  —  $—  
August 1, 2019 - August 31, 2019—  —  —  —  
September 1, 2019 - September 30, 2019388  21.90  —  —  
Total388  $21.90  —  $—  

(1) Shares withheld by the Company to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock awards.
  Total number of shares purchased (1) Average price paid per share Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs (2) Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
July 1, 2017 - July 31, 2017 
 $
 
 $29,933
August 1, 2017 - August 31, 2017 324
 18.40
 
 29,933
September 1, 2017 - September 30, 2017 
 
 
 29,933
Total 324
 $18.40
 
 $29,933
(1)Shares withheld by the Company to pay taxes upon vesting of restricted stock. These shares do not impact the remaining authorization to repurchase shares under approved plans or programs.

(2)On December 9, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30,000 of the Company’s common shares until December 31, 2017. This authorization became effective January 1, 2016. The $30,000 repurchase authorization is restricted under the terms of the Second Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated March 13, 2015. Dividends, distributions, and redemptions under the Second Amendment are capped at a maximum annual amount of $1,700 throughout the life of the repurchase authorization. For the three-month period ended September 30, 2017, there were no share repurchases as part of the authorized program.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
This item is not applicable to the Company.

32

Item 6. Exhibits
See Exhibit Index below.


Exhibit Index

Exhibit NumberDescription
Exhibit Number10.1Description
10.1
10.2*31.1
*31.1
*31.2
*32.0
*101.INSXBRL Instance Document.Document-the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
*101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
*101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
*101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
*101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
*101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
*104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
 
*Exhibits marked with an asterisk are filed herewith.



33

Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
Date:November 8, 2017October 30, 2019By: /s/ James P. Maloney
James P. Maloney
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer of Registrant)



40
34