UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
 
(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the quarterly period ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2017MARCH 31, 2019
 
(  )    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 for the transition period from ___________ to___________
 
Commission file number 1-8339


nslogoq217a06.jpg
 
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
Virginia
52-1188014
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
52-1188014
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
Three Commercial Place

Norfolk, Virginia
23510-2191
(Address of principal executive offices)
23510-2191
(Zip Code)
(757) 629-2680
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
No Change
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [  ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [X] No [  ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 
Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [  ]  Non-accelerated filer [  ]  Smaller reporting company [   ]  Emerging growth company [  ]


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange ActAct. [ ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [  ] No [X]
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class Outstanding at September 30, 2017March 31, 2019
Common Stock ($1.00 par value per share) 286,148,766 (excluding265,967,039(excluding 20,320,777 shares held by the registrant’s
consolidated subsidiaries)




TABLE OF CONTENTS


NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


  Page
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
    
  

2



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  
Item 1. Financial Statements.
 
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
 
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018
($ in millions, except per share amounts)($ in millions, except per share amounts)
          
Railway operating revenues$2,670
 $2,524
 $7,882
 $7,398
$2,840
 $2,717
          
Railway operating expenses: 
  
  
  
 
  
Compensation and benefits755
 691
 2,201
 2,081
727
 737
Purchased services and rents377
 386
 1,146
 1,149
424
 401
Fuel198
 181
 601
 504
250
 266
Depreciation265
 258
 788
 767
283
 272
Materials and other164
 188
 574
 584
190
 206
          
Total railway operating expenses1,759
 1,704
 5,310
 5,085
1,874
 1,882
          
Income from railway operations911
 820
 2,572
 2,313
966
 835
          
Other income – net23
 29
 79
 49
44
 8
Interest expense on debt134
 144
 416
 421
149
 136
          
Income before income taxes800
 705
 2,235
 1,941
861
 707
          
Provision for income taxes294
 245
 799
 689
Income taxes184
 155
          
Net income$506
 $460
 $1,436
 $1,252
$677
 $552
          
Per share amounts: 
  
  
  
Net income 
  
  
  
Earnings per share: 
  
Basic$1.76
 $1.56
 $4.96
 $4.23
$2.53
 $1.94
Diluted1.75
 1.55
 4.93
 4.21
2.51
 1.93
          
Dividends0.61
 0.59
 1.83
 1.77
 


See accompanying notes toconsolidatedfinancialstatements.
3



Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
 
 Third Quarter First Nine Months
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 ($ in millions)
        
Net income$506
 $460
 $1,436
 $1,252
Other comprehensive income, before tax: 
  
  
  
Reclassification adjustments for costs       
included in net income7
 7
 21
 20
Other comprehensive loss of       
equity investees
 
 (1) 
Other comprehensive income, before tax7
 7
 20
 20
        
Income tax expense related to reclassification       
adjustments for costs included in net income(2) (3) (8) (8)
        
Other comprehensive income, net of tax5
 4
 12
 12
        
Total comprehensive income$511
 $464
 $1,448
 $1,264
 First Quarter
 2019 2018
 ($ in millions)
    
Net income$677
 $552
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:   
Pension and other postretirement benefits (expense)5
 (7)
Other comprehensive income (loss) of equity investees(1) 1
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax4
 (6)
    
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of   
other comprehensive income (loss)(1) 2
    
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax3
 (4)
    
Total comprehensive income$680
 $548
 


See accompanying notes toconsolidatedfinancialstatements.
4



Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)


September 30,
2017
 December 31,
2016
March 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
($ in millions)($ in millions)
      
Assets 
  
 
  
Current assets: 
  
 
  
Cash and cash equivalents$724
 $956
$411
 $358
Accounts receivable – net973
 945
1,048
 1,009
Materials and supplies245
 257
228
 207
Other current assets57
 133
235
 288
Total current assets1,999
 2,291
1,922
 1,862
      
Investments2,888
 2,777
3,198
 3,109
Properties less accumulated depreciation of $11,987 and   
$11,737, respectively30,163
 29,751
Properties less accumulated depreciation of $12,374   
at both periods31,158
 31,091
Other assets103
 73
784
 177
      
Total assets$35,153
 $34,892
$37,062
 $36,239
      
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity 
  
 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts payable$1,287
 $1,215
$1,334
 $1,505
Short-term debt
 100
250
 
Income and other taxes206
 245
338
 255
Other current liabilities320
 229
378
 246
Current maturities of long-term debt600
 550
585
 585
Total current liabilities2,413
 2,339
2,885
 2,591
      
Long-term debt9,280
 9,562
10,569
 10,560
Other liabilities1,366
 1,442
1,759
 1,266
Deferred income taxes9,367
 9,140
6,518
 6,460
   
Total liabilities22,426
 22,483
21,731
 20,877
      
Stockholders’ equity: 
  
 
  
Common stock $1.00 per share par value, 1,350,000,000 shares 
  
 
  
authorized; outstanding 286,148,766 and 290,417,610 shares, 
  
authorized; outstanding 265,967,039 and 268,098,472 shares, 
  
respectively, net of treasury shares288
 292
267
 269
Additional paid-in capital2,249
 2,179
2,213
 2,216
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(475) (487)(560) (563)
Retained income10,665
 10,425
13,411
 13,440
      
Total stockholders’ equity12,727
 12,409
15,331
 15,362
      
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$35,153
 $34,892
$37,062
 $36,239
 


See accompanying notes toconsolidatedfinancialstatements.
5



Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
 
 First Nine Months First Three Months
 2017 2016 2019 2018
 ($ in millions) ($ in millions)
        
Cash flows from operating activities:Cash flows from operating activities: 
  
Cash flows from operating activities: 
  
Net income$1,436
 $1,252
Net income$677
 $552
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
  
Depreciation791
 770
Depreciation283
 272
Deferred income taxes219
 177
Deferred income taxes57
 45
Gains and losses on properties(62) (38)Gains and losses on properties(18) (8)
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting operations: 
  
Changes in assets and liabilities affecting operations: 
  
Accounts receivable(59) 8
Accounts receivable(39) (26)
Materials and supplies12
 (30)Materials and supplies(21) (23)
Other current assets68
 130
Other current assets12
 13
Current liabilities other than debt165
 149
Current liabilities other than debt(27) 12
Other – net(105) (106)Other – net(43) (21)
        
Net cash provided by operating activities2,465
 2,312
Net cash provided by operating activities881
 816
        
Cash flows from investing activities:Cash flows from investing activities: 
  
Cash flows from investing activities: 
  
Property additions(1,315) (1,304)Property additions(467) (383)
Property sales and other transactions137
 87
Property sales and other transactions152
 13
Investment purchases(4) (119)Investment purchases(2) (2)
Investment sales and other transactions8
 6
Investment sales and other transactions(33) 1
        
Net cash used in investing activities(1,174) (1,330)Net cash used in investing activities(350) (371)
        
Cash flows from financing activities:Cash flows from financing activities: 
  
Cash flows from financing activities: 
  
Dividends(529) (523)Dividends(230) (205)
Common stock transactions75
 33
Common stock transactions2
 (1)
Purchase and retirement of common stock(712) (603)Purchase and retirement of common stock(500) (300)
Proceeds from borrowings – net293
 594
Proceeds from borrowings – net of issuance costs250
 543
Debt repayments(650) (600)Debt repayments
 (100)
        
Net cash used in financing activities(1,523) (1,099)Net cash used in financing activities(478) (63)
        
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(232) (117)Net increase in cash, cash equivalents,   
    and restricted cash53
 382
Cash and cash equivalents: 
  
    
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash:Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash: 
  
At beginning of year956
 1,101
At beginning of year446
 690
        
At end of period$724
 $984
At end of period$499
 $1,072
        
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: 
  
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: 
  
Cash paid during the period for: 
  
Cash paid during the period for: 
  
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)$345
 $337
Interest (net of amounts capitalized)$112
 $69
Income taxes (net of refunds)594
 409
Income taxes (net of refunds)9
 7



See accompanying notes toconsolidatedfinancialstatements.
6



Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)

 
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Accum. Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
Retained
Income
 Total
 ($ in millions, except per share amounts)
          
Balance at December 31, 2018$269
 $2,216
 $(563) $13,440
 $15,362
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 677
 677
Other comprehensive income
 
 3
 
 3
Total comprehensive income
 
 
 
 680
Dividends on common stock,
 
 
 
 
$0.86 per share
 
 
 (230) (230)
Share repurchases(3) (22) 
 (475) (500)
Stock-based compensation1
 19
 
 (1) 19
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at March 31, 2019$267
 $2,213
 $(560) $13,411
 $15,331

 Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 Accum. Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Retained
Income
 Total
 ($ in millions, except per share amounts)
          
Balance at December 31, 2017$285
 $2,254
 $(356) $14,176
 $16,359
          
Comprehensive income:         
Net income
 
 
 552
 552
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (4) 
 (4)
Total comprehensive income
 
 
 
 548
Dividends on common stock,
 
 
 
 
$0.72 per share
 
 
 (205) (205)
Share repurchases(2) (16) 
 (282) (300)
Stock-based compensation1
 17
 
 (2) 16
Reclassification of stranded         
tax effects    (88) 88
 
          
Balance at March 31, 2018$284
 $2,255
 $(448) $14,327
 $16,418


See accompanying notes toconsolidatedfinancialstatements.
7


Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly Norfolk Southern Corporation (Norfolk Southern) and subsidiaries’ (collectively, NS, we, us, and our) financial position at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2016,2018, our results of operations, and comprehensive income and changes in stockholders’ equity for the thirdfirst quarters of 2019 and first nine months of 2017 and 2016,2018, and our cash flows for the first ninethree months of 20172019 and 20162018 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
 
These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K.


1. Railway Operating Revenues

The following table disaggregates our revenues by major commodity group:
  First Quarter
  2019 2018
Merchandise: ($ in millions)
Chemicals $452
 $454
Agriculture products 385
 357
Metals and construction 385
 356
Automotive 251
 243
Forest and consumer 213
 195
Merchandise 1,686
 1,605
Intermodal 719
 678
Coal 435
 434
     
Total $2,840
 $2,717


At the beginning of 2019, we recategorized certain commodities within Merchandise major commodity groups to better align with how we internally manage these commodities. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation with no net impact to overall Merchandise revenue or total railway operating revenues. Specifically, certain commodities were shifted between Chemicals, Agriculture products, Metals and construction, and Forest and consumer.

We recognize the amount of revenue we expect to be entitled to for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. A performance obligation is created when a customer under a transportation contract or public tariff submits a bill of lading to NS for the transport of goods. These performance obligations are satisfied as the shipments move from origin to destination. As such, transportation revenue is recognized proportionally as a shipment moves, and related expenses are recognized as incurred. These performance obligations are generally short-term in nature with transit days averaging approximately one week or less for each commodity group. The customer has an unconditional obligation to pay for the service once the service has been completed. Estimated revenue associated with in-process shipments at period-end is recorded based on the estimated percentage of service completed to total transit days. We had no material remaining performance obligations as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.


8


Under the typical payment terms of our freight contracts, payment for services is due within fifteen days of billing the customer, thus there are no significant financing components. “Accounts receivable – net” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes both customer and non-customer receivables as follows:
  March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
  ($ in millions)
Customer                                        $793
 $740
Non-customer 255
 269
     
  Accounts receivable – net $1,048
 $1,009


Non-customer receivables include non-revenue-related amounts due from other railroads, governmental entities, and others.  “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes non-current customer receivables of $55 million at both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  We do not have any material contract assets or liabilities.

Certain ancillary services may be provided to customers under their transportation contracts such as switching, demurrage and other incidental service revenues. These are distinct performance obligations that are recognized at a point in time when the services are performed or as contractual obligations are met. This revenue is included within each of the commodity groups and represents approximately 5% and 4% of total “Railway operating revenues” on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

2.  Stock-Based Compensation
  First Quarter
  2019 2018
  ($ in millions)
Stock-based compensation expense $16
 $16
Total tax benefit 23
 14

  Third Quarter First Nine Months
  2017 2016 2017 2016
  ($ in millions)
Stock-based compensation expense $7
 $7
 $39
 $42
Total tax benefit 13
 8
 47
 27


During 2017,the first quarter 2019, a committee of nonemployee members of our Board of Directors (or(and the Chief Executive Officer whenunder delegated authority by such committee) granted stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs) pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and granted stock options pursuant to the Thoroughbred Stock Option Plan (TSOP), as follows:
  First Quarter
  Granted Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
     
Stock options 42,380
 $45.61
RSUs 208,320
 163.33
PSUs 93,710
 97.75

    Third Quarter First Nine Months
    Granted Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value Granted Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Stock options:        
 LTIP 
 $
 341,120
 $37.73
 TSOP 
 
 144,440
 31.33
  Total 
   485,560
  
           
Restricted stock units 
 
 83,330
 120.16
Performance share units 1,775
 119.73
 297,376
 88.16

 


9


Stock Options

  First Quarter
  2019 2018
  ($ in millions)
Stock options exercised 406,371
 254,982
Cash received upon exercise $28
 $17
Related tax benefit realized 9
 4

The options granted under the LTIP and the TSOP have a term that will not exceed ten years and may not be exercised prior to the fourth and third anniversaries of the date of grant, respectively, or if the optionee retires or dies before that anniversary date, may not be exercised before the later of one year after the grant date or the date of the optionee’s retirement or death. Holders of the options granted under the LTIP who remain actively employed receive cash dividend equivalent payments for four years in an amount equal to the regular quarterly dividends paid on Norfolk Southern common stock (Common Stock). Dividend equivalent payments are not made on the TSOP options.

The fair value of each option award was measured on the date of grant using a binomial lattice-based option valuation model. Expected volatility is based on implied volatility from traded options on, and historical volatility of, Common Stock. Historical data is used to estimate option exercises within the valuation model. The average

expected option term is derived from the output of the valuation model and represents the period of time that all options granted are expected to be outstanding, including the branches of the model that result in options expiring unexercised. The average risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. A dividend yield of zero was used for the LTIP options during the vesting period.  A dividend yield of 2.04% was used for all vested LTIP options and all TSOP options.

The assumptions for the 2017 LTIP and TSOP grants are shown in the following table:
Average expected volatility26%
Average risk-free interest rate2.51%
Average expected option term LTIP8.6 years
Average expected option term TSOP8.3 years
Per-share grant price LTIP and TSOP$120.25

  Third Quarter First Nine Months
  2017 2016 2017 2016
 ($ in millions)
Stock options exercised 527,543
 633,931
 1,538,858
 1,003,848
Cash received upon exercise $33
 $32
 $90
 $50
Related tax benefit realized $10
 $6
 $29
 $8


Restricted Stock Units


Beginning in 2018, RSUs granted primarily have a five-yearfour-year ratable restriction period and will be settled through the issuance of shares of Norfolk Southern common stock (Common Stock). RSUs granted in previous years have a five-year restriction period and will also be settled through the issuance of shares of Common Stock. TheCertain RSU grants include cash dividend equivalent payments during the restriction period in an amount equal to the regular quarterly dividends paid on Common Stock. The total related tax benefits were less than $1 million for the third quarter of 2017 and 2016. No RSUs vested or were paid out during the second or third quarters of 2017 or 2016.

  First Quarter
  2019 2018
  ($ in millions)
RSUs vested 165,549
 160,200
Common Stock issued net of tax withholding 118,881
 99,968
Related tax benefit realized $2
 $3

  First Nine Months
  2017 2016
  ($ in millions)
RSUs vested 137,200
 175,500
Common Stock issued net of tax withholding 81,318
 103,936
Related tax benefit realized $3
 $1


Performance Share Units

PSUs provide for awards based on the achievement of certain predetermined corporate performance goals at the end of a three-year cycle and are settled through the issuance of shares of Common Stock. All PSUs will earn out based on the achievement of performance conditions and some will also earn out based on a market condition. The market condition fair value was measured on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation model. No PSUs were earned or paid out during the second or third quarters of 2017 or 2016.

  First Quarter
  2019 2018
  ($ in millions)
PSUs earned 331,099
 154,189
Common Stock issued net of tax withholding 221,241
 94,399
Related tax benefit realized $9
 $3


10

  First Nine Months
  2017 2016
  ($ in millions)
PSUs earned 171,080
 406,038
Common Stock issued net of tax withholding 99,805
 241,757
Related tax benefit realized $1
 $3


2.3.  Earnings Per Share


The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:


Basic DilutedBasic Diluted
Third QuarterFirst Quarter
2017 2016 2017 20162019 2018 2019 2018
($ in millions, except per share amounts,
shares in millions)
($ in millions, except per share amounts,
shares in millions)
              
Net income$506
 $460
 $506
 $460
$677
 $552
 $677
 $552
Dividend equivalent payments(1) (3) 
 (2)(1) (1) 
 (1)
              
Income available to common stockholders$505
 $457
 $506
 $458
$676
 $551
 $677
 $551
              
Weighted-average shares outstanding287.1
 292.7
 287.1
 292.7
267.1
 283.5
 267.1
 283.5
Dilutive effect of outstanding options 
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
and share-settled awards 
  
 2.4
 2.0
 
  
 2.3
 2.4
              
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding 
  
 289.5
 294.7
 
  
 269.4
 285.9
              
Earnings per share$1.76
 $1.56
 $1.75
 $1.55
$2.53
 $1.94
 $2.51
 $1.93

 Basic Diluted
 First Nine Months
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 ($ in millions, except per share amounts,
shares in millions)
Net income$1,436
 $1,252
 $1,436
 $1,252
Dividend equivalent payments(3) (5) (1) (4)
        
Income available to common stockholders$1,433
 $1,247
 $1,435
 $1,248
        
Weighted-average shares outstanding288.8
 294.9
 288.8
 294.9
Dilutive effect of outstanding options 
  
  
  
and share-settled awards 
  
 2.4
 1.8
        
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding 
  
 291.2
 296.7
        
Earnings per share$4.96
 $4.23
 $4.93
 $4.21


During the third quartersfirst quarter of 2019 and first nine months of 2017 and 2016,2018, dividend equivalent payments were made to certain holders of LTIP stock options and RSUs.  For purposes of computing basic earnings per share, dividend equivalent payments made to holders of these stock options and RSUs were deducted from net income to determine income available to common stockholders. For purposes of computing diluted earnings per share, we evaluate on a grant-by-grant basis those stock options and RSUs receiving dividend equivalent payments under the two-class and treasury stock methods to determine which method is the more dilutive for each grant. For those grants for which the two-class method was more dilutive, net income was reduced by dividend equivalent payments to determine

income available to common stockholders. The dilution calculations exclude options having exercise prices exceeding the average market price of Common Stock as follows:of zero for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.



11
Period 2017 2016 
  (in millions) 
1st Quarter 0.5
 1.5
 
2nd Quarter 0.5
 1.5
 
3rd Quarter 
 1.5
 


3.
4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The changes in the cumulative balances of “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following:
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
 
Net Income
(Loss)
 
Reclassification of Stranded
Tax Effects
 
Reclassification
Adjustments
 
Balance at
End of Period
 ($ in millions)    
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019         
Pensions and other         
postretirement liabilities$(497) $
 $
 $4
 $(493)
Other comprehensive loss 
  
    
  
of equity investees(66) (1) 
 
 (67)
          
Accumulated other         
 comprehensive loss$(563) $(1) $
 $4
 $(560)
          
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 
  
    
  
Pensions and other         
postretirement liabilities$(300) $(11) $(86) $6
 $(391)
Other comprehensive income         
(loss) of equity investees(56) 1
 (2) 
 (57)
          
Accumulated other         
 comprehensive loss$(356) $(10) $(88) $6
 $(448)

 
Balance
at Beginning
of Year
 
Net
Loss
 
Reclassification
Adjustments
 
Balance
at End
of Period
 ($ in millions)    
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017       
Pensions and other postretirement       
liabilities$(414) $
 $13
(1) 
$(401)
Other comprehensive loss 
  
  
  
of equity investees(73) (1) 
 (74)
        
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(487) $(1) $13
 $(475)
        
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 
  
  
  
Pensions and other postretirement       
liabilities$(367) $
 $12
(1) 
$(355)
Other comprehensive loss       
of equity investees(78) 
 
 (78)
        
Accumulated other comprehensive loss$(445) $
 $12
 $(433)

(1)
These items are included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs. See Note 7, “Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” for additional information.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” We adopted the provisions of ASU 2018-02 in the first quarter of 2018 resulting in an increase to “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” of $88 million and a corresponding increase to “Retained income,” with no impact on “Total stockholders’ equity.”

4.5.  Stock Repurchase Program
 
We repurchased and retired 6.02.9 million shares and 7.22.1 million shares of Common Stock under our stock repurchase program in the first ninethree months of 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, at a cost of $712$500 million and $603$300 million, respectively.

Since the beginning of 2006, we have repurchased and retired 166.3188.5 million shares at a total cost of $11.0$14.6 billion.


5.6.  Investments


Investment in Conrail
 
Through a limited liability company, we and CSX Corporation (CSX) jointly own Conrail Inc. (Conrail), whose primary subsidiary is Consolidated Rail Corporation (CRC). We have a 58% economic and 50% voting interest in

the jointly owned entity, and CSX has the remainder of the economic and voting interests. Our investment in Conrail was $1.2$1.3 billion at both September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2016.2018.


12



CRC owns and operates certain properties (the Shared Assets Areas) for the joint and exclusive benefit of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) and CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT). The costs of operating the Shared Assets Areas are borne by NSR and CSXT based on usage. In addition, NSR and CSXT pay CRC a fee for access to the Shared Assets Areas. “Purchased services and rents” and “Fuel” include amounts payable to CRC for the operation of the Shared Assets Areas totaling $34$37 million and $38 million for the thirdfirst quarters of 20172019 and 2016, respectively, and $106 million and $113 million for the first nine months of 2017 and 2016,2018, respectively. Our equity in the earnings of Conrail, net of amortization, included in “Purchased services and rents” was $10$8 million and $15 million for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $30 million and $37$16 million for the first nine monthsquarters of 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. 


“Other liabilities” includes $280 million at both September 30, 2017, March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2016,2018, for long-term advances from Conrail, maturing 2044, that bear interest at an average rate of 2.9%.


Investment in TTX



NS and eight other North American railroads jointly own TTX Company (TTX).  NS has a 19.65% ownership interest in TTX, a railcar pooling company that provides its owner-railroads with standardized fleets of intermodal, automotive, and general use railcars at stated rates.


Amounts payablepaid to TTX for use of equipment are included in “Purchased services and rents” and amounted to $58$62 million and $56$66 million of expense for the thirdfirst quarters of 20172019 and 2016, respectively, and $173 million and $170 million for the first nine months of 2017 and 2016,2018, respectively. Our equity in the earnings of TTX, also included in “Purchased services and rents,” totaled $14$13 million and $8 million for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $32 million and $18$16 million for the first nine monthsquarters of 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.


6.7.  Debt


We have a $400 million accounts receivable securitization program expiring in place a $350May 2019.  We had $250 million receivables securitization facility which expires in June 2018. At September 30, 2017, the amount outstanding under this program at March 31, 2019, reflected as “Short-term debt” on the facility was $100Consolidated Balance Sheets, and no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2018.

The “Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash” line item in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows includes restricted cash of $88 million at March 31, 2019 and wasDecember 31, 2018 reflecting deposits held by a third-party bond agent as collateral for certain debt obligations maturing in 2019. The restricted cash balance is included within “Long-term debt” dueas part of “Other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in both periods.

8. Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” and subsequent amendments, which replaced existing lease guidance in GAAP and requires lessees to recognize right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for leases greater than twelve months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. We adopted the standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method and used the effective date as our intentdate of initial application. Financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. There were no adjustments to refinance $100 million“Retained income” on adoption.
The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients for transition. We elected the package of practical expedients under the transition guidance which permitted us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions for lease identification and lease classification on expired or existing contracts and whether initial direct costs previously capitalized would qualify for capitalization under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 842. We also elected the practical expedient related to land easements, which allowed us to not reassess our current accounting treatment for existing agreements on land easements, which are not accounted for as leases. We did not elect the hindsight practical expedient to determine the reasonably certain lease term for existing leases.

13


The new standard also provides practical expedients and recognition exemptions for an entity’s ongoing accounting policy elections. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we do not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities.
We are committed under long-term lease agreements for equipment, lines of road, and other property. Some of these borrowingsagreements contain variable payment provisions that depend on an index or rate, initially measured using the index or rate at the lease commencement date, and are therefore not included in our future minimum lease payments. These variable lease agreements include usage-based payments for equipment under service contracts, lines of road, and other property. Our long-term lease agreements do not contain any material restrictive covenants.
Our equipment leases have remaining terms of less than 1 year to 9 years and our lines of road and property leases have remaining terms of less than 1 year to 138 years. Some of these leases may include options to extend the leases for up to 99 years, and some may include options to terminate the leases within 30 days. Because we are not reasonably certain to exercise these renewal options, the options are not considered in determining the lease term, and associated payments are excluded from future minimum lease payments.

Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. We recognize lease expense for these leases on a long-termstraight-line basis over the lease term. We do not separate lease and non-lease components.

Operating lease amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows:
  March 31, 2019
AssetsClassification($ in millions)
ROU assetsOther assets$593
   
Liabilities  
Current lease liabilitiesOther current liabilities$93
Non-current lease liabilitiesOther liabilities500
   
Total lease liabilities $593
   

The components of operating lease expense, primarily included in“Purchased services and rents,” were as follows:
 First Quarter
 2019
 ($ in millions)
Operating lease expense$27
Variable lease expense12
Short-term lease expense2
  
Total lease expense$41


At March 31, 2019, we do not have any material finance lease assets or liabilities, nor do we have any material subleases.

14


During March 2019, we entered into a non-cancellable lease for an office building with an estimated construction cost of $550 million. The lease will commence upon completion of the construction (for which we are a construction agent) of the office building which is supported by our $750 million credit agreement.expected to be in 2021. The initial term of the lease is five years, with options to renew, purchase, or sell the office building at the end of the lease term. Upon lease commencement, the ROU asset and lease liability will be determined and recorded. The lease also contains a residual value guarantee of up to ninety percent of the total construction cost.

Other information related to operating leases was as follows:
 First Quarter
 2019
 ($ in millions)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: 
Operating cash flows from operating leases$27
  
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities29
  
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) on operating leases8.68
  
Weighted-average discount rates on operating leases3.52%

During the thirdfirst quarter, of 2017, we issued $750cash proceeds from a sale and leaseback transaction were $82 million of senior notes at 4.050% due 2052 in exchangeand the gain on the transaction was $15 million.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases were as follows:
 March 31, 2019
 ($ in millions)
2019 - 9 months$84
2020105
202199
202276
202368
2024 and subsequent years266
Total lease payments$698
Less: Interest105
  
Present value of lease liabilities$593



15


Undiscounted future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases accounted for $551 million of its previously issued notes ($48 million at 7.9% due 2097, $378 million at 6% due 2111, and $125 million at 6% due 2105).  No gain or loss was recognizedunder ASC 840 “Leases” were as a result of the debt exchange. follows:

 December 31, 2018
 ($ in millions)
2019$101
202095
202188
202275
202369
2024 and subsequent years267
  
Total$695

During the second quarter of 2017, we issued $300 million of 3.15% senior notes due 2027.


7.9.  Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
 
We have both funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans covering principally salaried employees. We also provide specified health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retired employees; these plans can be amended or terminated at our option.  Under our self-insured retiree health care plan, for those participants who are not Medicare-eligible, a defined percentage of health care expenses is covered for retired employees and their dependents, reduced by any deductibles, coinsurance, and, in some cases, coverage provided under other group insurance policies.  Those participants who are Medicare-eligible are not covered under the self-insured retiree health care plan, but instead are provided with an employer-funded health reimbursement account which can be used for reimbursement of health insurance premiums or eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses.


Pension and postretirement benefit cost components for the thirdfirst quarter and first nine months are as follows:

        
     Other Postretirement
 Pension Benefits Benefits
 First Quarter
 2019 2018 2019 2018
 ($ in millions)
        
Service cost$9
 $10
 $2
 $2
Interest cost23
 20
 4
 4
Expected return on plan assets(45) (44) (4) (4)
Amortization of net losses11
 14
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
 
 (6) (6)
        
Net benefit$(2) $
 $(4) $(4)


The service cost component of defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost are reported within “Compensation and benefits” and all other components of net benefit cost are presented in “Other income – net” on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

     Other Postretirement
 Pension Benefits Benefits
 Third Quarter
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 ($ in millions)
        
Service cost$9
 $9
 $2
 $2
Interest cost20
 20
 4
 4
Expected return on plan assets(43) (43) (4) (4)
Amortization of net losses13
 13
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
 
 (6) (6)
        
Net benefit$(1) $(1) $(4) $(4)


16
     Other Postretirement
 Pension Benefits Benefits
 First Nine Months
 2017 2016 2017 2016
 ($ in millions)
Service cost$28
 $27
 $6
 $5
Interest cost60
 61
 12
 12
Expected return on plan assets(129) (129) (12) (13)
Amortization of net losses39
 38
 
 
Amortization of prior service benefit
 
 (18) (18)
        
Net benefit$(2) $(3) $(12) $(14)


8.
10.  Fair Values of Financial Instruments
 
The fair values of “Cash and cash equivalents,” “Accounts receivable – net,” “Accounts payable,” and “Short-term debt” approximate carrying values because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying value of corporate-owned life insurance is recorded at cash surrender value and, accordingly, approximates fair value. Other than these assets and liabilities that approximate fair value, thereThere are no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2016.2018. The carrying amounts and estimated fair

values, for the remaining financial instruments, excluding investments accounted for under the equity method,based on Level 1 inputs, of long-term debt consisted of the following:

 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 ($ in millions)
        
Long-term debt, including current maturities$(11,154) $(12,698) $(11,145) $(12,203)

 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 ($ in millions)
        
Long-term investments$114
 $136
 $116
 $141
Long-term debt, including current maturities(9,880) (11,774) (10,112) (11,626)
Underlying net assets and future discounted cash flows were used to estimate the fair value of investments. The fair values of long-term debt were estimated based on quoted market prices or discounted cash flows using current interest rates for debt with similar terms, credit rating, and remaining maturity.
The following table sets forth the fair value of long-term investment and long-term debt balances disclosed above by valuation technique level, within the fair value hierarchy (there were no level 3 valued assets or liabilities).
 Level 1 Level 2 Total
 ($ in millions)
      
September 30, 2017     
Long-term investments$4
 $132
 $136
Long-term debt, including current maturities(11,576) (198) (11,774)
      
December 31, 2016 
  
  
Long-term investments$4
 $137
 $141
Long-term debt, including current maturities(11,427) (199) (11,626)

9.11.  Commitments and Contingencies
 
Lawsuits
 
We and/or certain subsidiaries are defendants in numerous lawsuits and other claims relating principally to railroad operations.  When we conclude that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated, it is accrued through a charge to earnings.  While the ultimate amount of liability incurred in any of these lawsuits and claims is dependent on future developments, in our opinion, the recorded liability is adequate to cover the future payment of such liability and claims.  However, the final outcome of any of these lawsuits and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and unfavorable or unexpected outcomes could result in additional accruals that could be significant to results of operations in a particular year or quarter.  Any adjustments to the recorded liability will be reflected in earnings in the periods in which such adjustments become known.


One of our chemical customers, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership (Sunbelt), filed a rate reasonableness complaint before the Surface Transportation Board (STB) alleging that our tariff rates for transportation of regulated movements are unreasonable. Since April 1, 2011, we have been billing and collecting amounts based on the challenged tariff rates. In 2014, the STB resolved this rate reasonableness complaint in our favor, and in June 2016, the STB resolved petitions for reconsideration. The matter remains decided in our favor; however, the findings are still subject to appeal. We believe the estimate of any reasonably possible loss will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. With regard to rate cases, we record adjustments to revenues in the periods if and when such adjustments are probable and reasonably estimable.


On November 6, 2007, various antitrust class actions filed against us and other Class I railroads in various Federal district courts regarding fuel surcharges were consolidated in the District of Columbia by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. On June 21,In 2012, the court certified the case as a class action. The defendant railroads appealed this certification, and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the District Court’s decision and remanded the case for further consideration. On October 10, 2017, the District Court denied class certification.certification; the findings are subject to appeal. We believe the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the cases. We do not believe the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.


Casualty Claims


Casualty claims include employee personal injury and occupational claims as well as third-party claims, all exclusive of legal costs.  To aid in valuing our personal injury liability and determining the amount to accrue with respect to such claims during the year, we utilize studies prepared by an independent consulting actuarial firm.  Job-related accidentalpersonal injury and occupational claims are subject to the Federal Employers’Employer’s Liability Act (FELA), which is applicable only to railroads.  FELA’s fault-based tort system produces results that are unpredictable and inconsistent as compared with a no-fault workers’ compensation system.  The variability inherent in this system could result in actual costs being different from the liability recorded.  While the ultimate amount of claims incurred is dependent on future developments, in our opinion, the recorded liability is adequate to cover the future payments of claims and is supported by the most recent actuarial study.  In all cases, we record a liability when the expected loss for the claim is both probable and reasonably estimable.
 

17


Employee personal injury claims – The largest component of casualties and other claims expense is employee personal injury costs.  The independent actuarial firm engaged by us provides quarterly studies to aid in valuing our employee personal injury liability and estimating personal injury expense.  The actuarial firm studies our historical patterns of reserving for claims and subsequent settlements, taking into account relevant outside influences.  The actuarial firm uses the results of these analyses to estimate the ultimate amount of liability. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study. Our estimate of the liability is subject to inherent limitation given the difficulty of predicting future events such as jury decisions, court interpretations, or legislative changes. As a result, actual claim settlements may vary from the estimated liability recorded.


Occupational claims – Occupational claims (including asbestosisinclude injuries and other respiratory diseases,illnesses alleged to be caused by exposures which occur over time as well as conditions allegedly relatedopposed to repetitive motion) are often notinjuries or illnesses caused by a specific accident or event but rather allegedly result from aevent. Types of occupational claims commonly seen allege exposure to asbestos and other claimed toxic substances resulting in respiratory diseases or cancer, exposure over time.to repetitive motion resulting in various musculoskeletal disorders, and exposure to excessive noise resulting in hearing loss. Many such claims are being asserted by former or retired employees, some of whom have not been employed in the rail industry for decades.  The independent actuarial firm provides an estimate of the occupational claims liability based upon our history of claim filings, severity, payments, and other pertinent facts.  The liability is dependent upon judgments we make as to the specific case reserves as well as judgments of the actuarial firm in the quarterly studies.  The actuarial firm’s estimate of ultimate loss includes a provision for those claims that have been incurred but not reported.  This provision is derived by analyzing industry data and projecting our experience. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study.  However, it is possible that the recorded liability may not be adequate to cover the future payment of claims.  Adjustments to the recorded liability are reflected in operating expenses in the periods in which such adjustments become known.


Third-party claims – We record a liability for third-party claims including those for highway crossing accidents, trespasser and other injuries, automobile liability, property damage, and lading damage.  The actuarial firm assists us with the calculation of potential liability for third-party claims, except lading damage, based upon our experience including the number and timing of incidents, amount of payments, settlement rates, number of open claims, and legal defenses. We adjust the liability quarterly based upon our assessment and the results of the study.  Given the inherent uncertainty in regard to the ultimate outcome of third-party claims, it is possible that the actual loss may differ from the estimated liability recorded.



Environmental Matters
 
We are subject to various jurisdictions’ environmental laws and regulations.  We record a liability where such liability or loss is probable and reasonably estimable. Environmental engineersspecialists regularly participate in ongoing evaluations of all known sites and in determining any necessary adjustments to liability estimates.  
 
Our Consolidated Balance Sheets include liabilities for environmental exposures of $62$58 million and $67$55 million at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016,2018, respectively, (ofof which $15 million areis classified as a current liabilitiesliability at both dates).dates. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the liability represents our estimates of the probable cleanup, investigation, and remediation costs based on available information at 131112 known locations and projects compared with 134114 locations and projects at December 31, 2016.2018. At September 30, 2017, 17March 31, 2019, fifteen sites accounted for $41$39 million of the liability, and no individual site was considered to be material. We anticipate that much of this liability will be paid out over five years; however, some costs will be paid out over a longer period.


At thirteeneleven locations, one or more of our subsidiaries in conjunction with a number of other parties have been identified as potentially responsible parties under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 or comparable state statutes that impose joint and several liability for cleanup costs.  We calculate our estimated liability for these sites based on facts and legal defenses applicable to each site and not solely on the basis of the potential for joint liability.
 

18


With respect to known environmental sites (whether identified by us or by the Environmental Protection Agency or comparable state authorities), estimates of our ultimate potential financial exposure for a given site or in the aggregate for all such sites can change over time because of the widely varying costs of currently available cleanup techniques, unpredictable contaminant recovery and reduction rates associated with available cleanup technologies, the likely development of new cleanup technologies, the difficulty of determining in advance the nature and full extent of contamination and each potential participant’s share of any estimated loss (and that participant’s ability to bear it), and evolving statutory and regulatory standards governing liability.
 
The risk of incurring environmental liability for acts and omissions, past, present, and future, is inherent in the railroad business.  Some of the commodities we transport, particularly those classified as hazardous materials, pose special risks that we work diligently to reduce.  In addition, several of our subsidiaries own, or have owned, land used as operating property, or which is leased and operated by others, or held for sale.  Because environmental problems that are latent or undisclosed may exist on these properties, there can be no assurance that we will not incur environmental liabilities or costs with respect to one or more of them, the amount and materiality of which cannot be estimated reliably at this time.  Moreover, lawsuits and claims involving these and potentially other unidentified environmental sites and matters are likely to arise from time to time.  The resulting liabilities could have a significant effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity in a particular year or quarter.
 
Based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances now known, we believe we have recorded the probable and reasonably estimable costs for dealing with those environmental matters of which we are aware.  Further, we believe that it is unlikely that any known matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
 
Insurance
 
We obtain on behalf of ourself and our subsidiaries insurance for potential losses for third-party liability and first-party property damages.  We are currently self-insured up to $50 million and above $1.1 billion ($1.5 billion for specific perils) per occurrence and/or policy year for bodily injury and property damage to third parties and up to $25 million and above $200 million per occurrence and/or policy year for property owned by us or in our care, custody, or control.
 

10.12. New Accounting Pronouncements


In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This update will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP and require an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new standard will be effective for our annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018. ASU 2014-09 permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective transition method. Freight revenue will continue to be recognized proportionally as a shipment moves from origin to destination and other revenues will be recognized as performance obligations are satisfied.  We have substantially completed our analysis and do not expect that adoption of the standard will have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations. Certain additional financial statement disclosure requirements are mandated by the new standard including disclosure of contract assets and contract liabilities as well as a disaggregated view of revenue, which we expect to be similar to our current disclosures within the “Railway Operating Revenues” section of Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We do not plan to adopt the standard early and will use the modified retrospective transition method.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” This update, effective for our annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2019, will replace existing lease guidance in GAAP and will require lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases greater than twelve months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. When implemented, lessees and lessors will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the effects ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We disclosed $614 million in operating lease obligations in our lease commitments footnote in our most recent Form 10-K and we will evaluate those contracts as well as other existing arrangements to determine if they qualify for lease accounting under the new standard. We do not plan to adopt the standard early.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Credit Losses - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,” which replaces the current incurred loss impairment method with a method that reflects expected credit losses. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2020, and early adoption is permitted as of January 1, 2019. Because credit losses associated from our tradeaccounts receivables have historically been insignificant, we do not expect this standard to have a material effect on our financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” This update, effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2018, We will require segregation of these net benefit costs between operating and non-operating expenses. Currently, we report the net benefit costs associated with our defined benefit and postretirement plans in the “Compensation and benefits” line item of the Consolidated Statements of Income, as disclosed in Note 7, “Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.” When the ASU is implemented, only the service cost component of defined benefit pension cost and postretirement benefit cost will be reported within compensation costs, while all other components of net benefit cost will be presented within the “Other income net” line item on the Consolidated Statements of Income. The standard requires retrospective application, and as such the adoption of this standard will result in offsetting increases in “Compensation and benefits” expense and “Other income net” on the Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods of 2017 and 2016, with no impact on net income. We did not adopt the standard early.



1619



Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
Norfolk Southern Corporation and Subsidiaries
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
 
OVERVIEW
 
We are one of the nation’s premier transportation companies.  Our Norfolk Southern Railway Company subsidiary operates approximately 19,500 route miles of road in 22 states and the District of Columbia, serves every major container port in the eastern United States, and provides efficient connections to other rail carriers.  We operateNorfolk Southern is a major transporter of industrial products, including chemicals, agriculture, and metals and construction materials. In addition, the railroad operates the most extensive intermodal network in the East and areis a major transporterprincipal carrier of coal, automobiles, and automotive and industrial products. parts.


Record-settingOur first quarter 2019 results reflect the initial steps in the third quarter were the result of the sustained executionimplementation of our new strategic plan.plan that we unveiled in February. We achieved an all-timea record quarterlylow first-quarter operating ratio (a measure of the amount of operating revenues consumed by operating expenses) of 65.9%66.0%, in the third quarter, and first nine-monthaddition to first-quarter records for bothrailway operating ratiorevenues, income from railway operations, net income, and diluted earnings per share. We are inhave started the year with positive momentum as we build a position to support additional volume growthstronger company for our shareholders, customers, and manage higher volume-related expenses and inflationary headwinds while continuing to improve productivity.employees.


SUMMARIZED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter 
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change 
Income from railway operations$911
 $820
 11% $2,572
 $2,313
 11%$966
 $835
 16% 
Net income$506
 $460
 10% $1,436
 $1,252
 15%$677
 $552
 23% 
Diluted earnings per share$1.75
 $1.55
 13% $4.93
 $4.21
 17%$2.51
 $1.93
 30% 
Railway operating ratio (percent)65.9
 67.5
 (2%) 67.4
 68.7
 (2%)66.0
 69.3
 (5%) 


The rise in net income for both periods was driven by increased incomeIncome from railway operations rose as a result of higherincreased railway operating revenues, offset in partdriven by increases in railway operating expenses. Traffic volume was up 4% for the third quarter and 5% for the first nine months compared to the same periods last year, andhigher average revenue per unit, growth was driven byreflecting pricing gains, and higher fuel surcharge revenuesrevenue, and increased accessorial charges. Overall volumes were flat, as gains in both periods.intermodal were tempered by declines in coal and merchandise. Railway operating expenses were relatively flat as fuel price declines, decreased compensation expense, and lower expenses due to increased network velocity were offset by increases in purchased services. Our share repurchase program resulted in diluted earnings per share growth that exceeded that of net income.


20



DETAILED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Railway Operating Revenues

The following tables present a comparison of revenues ($ in millions), volumes (units in thousands), and average revenue per unit ($ per unit) by marketcommodity group. At the beginning of 2019, we made changes in the categorization of certain commodity groups within Merchandise. Prior period railway operating revenues, units, and revenue per unit have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation (see Note 1).
 Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter 
Revenues 2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change 
Merchandise:             
Chemicals $418
 $408
 2% $1,251
 $1,253
 $452
 $454
 
Agr./consumer/gov’t 388
 380
 2% 1,156
 1,149
 1%
Metals/construction 378
 337
 12% 1,089
 971
 12%
Agriculture products385
 357
 8% 
Metals and construction385
 356
 8% 
Automotive 218
 236
 (8%) 713
 738
 (3%)251
 243
 3% 
Paper/clay/forest 198
 191
 4% 572
 567
 1%
Forest and consumer213
 195
 9% 
Merchandise 1,600
 1,552
 3% 4,781
 4,678
 2%1,686
 1,605
 5% 
Intermodal 621
 575
 8% 1,785
 1,635
 9%719
 678
 6% 
Coal 449
 397
 13% 1,316
 1,085
 21%435
 434
 
    
Total $2,670
 $2,524
 6% $7,882
 $7,398
 7%$2,840
 $2,717
 5% 
Units      
Merchandise:             
Chemicals 115.2
 117.5
 (2%) 348.6
 360.9
 (3%)125.9
 126.6
 (1%) 
Agr./consumer/gov’t 147.8
 147.6
  443.0
 447.0
 (1%)
Metals/construction 194.2
 186.9
 4% 556.0
 525.4
 6%
Agriculture products130.9
 129.9
 1% 
Metals and construction173.9
 175.9
 (1%) 
Automotive 96.6
 106.8
 (10%) 318.5
 332.8
 (4%)98.1
 102.8
 (5%) 
Paper/clay/forest 73.4
 71.7
 2% 214.3
 216.3
 (1%)
Forest and consumer69.4
 70.9
 (2%) 
Merchandise 627.2
 630.5
 (1%) 1,880.4
 1,882.4
 598.2
 606.1
 (1%) 
Intermodal 1,035.2
 993.5
 4% 3,013.7
 2,874.4
 5%1,071.0
 1,049.2
 2% 
Coal 266.6
 238.2
 12% 792.3
 663.0
 20%236.3
 249.1
 (5%) 
    
Total 1,929.0
 1,862.2
 4% 5,686.4
 5,419.8
 5%1,905.5
 1,904.4
 
Revenue per Unit      
Merchandise:             
Chemicals $3,624
 $3,473
 4% $3,586
 $3,472
 3%$3,587
 $3,585
 
Agr./consumer/gov’t 2,626
 2,577
 2% 2,610
 2,571
 2%
Metals/construction 1,945
 1,802
 8% 1,959
 1,848
 6%
Agriculture products2,945
 2,744
 7% 
Metals and construction2,217
 2,023
 10% 
Automotive 2,256
 2,217
 2% 2,239
 2,219
 1%2,557
 2,362
 8% 
Paper/clay/forest 2,699
 2,655
 2% 2,668
 2,620
 2%
Forest and consumer3,070
 2,755
 11% 
Merchandise 2,550
 2,462
 4% 2,542
 2,485
 2%2,819
 2,647
 6% 
Intermodal 600
 579
 4% 592
 569
 4%671
 647
 4% 
Coal 1,687
 1,666
 1% 1,662
 1,636
 2%1,839
 1,743
 6% 
Total 1,384
 1,355
 2% 1,386
 1,365
 2%1,490
 1,427
 4% 




Third-quarter railway





21


Railway operating revenues increased $146$123 million in the first quarter over the same period last year.  For the first nine months, railway operating revenues increased $484 million. The table below reflects the components of the revenue change by major marketcommodity group over the same period last year ($ in millions).

 Third Quarter First Nine Months
 Increase (Decrease) Increase (Decrease)
            
 Merchandise Intermodal Coal Merchandise Intermodal Coal
            
Volume$(8) $24
 $47
 $(5) $79
 $212
Fuel surcharge           
revenue7
 10
 
 22
 51
 10
Rate, mix and           
other49
 12
 5
 86
 20
 9
            
Total$48
 $46
 $52
 $103
 $150
 $231
  First Quarter
  Increase (Decrease)
       
  Merchandise Intermodal Coal
       
Volume $(21) $14
 $(22)
Fuel surcharge revenue 14
 9
 (1)
Rate, mix and other 88
 18
 24
       
Total $81
 $41
 $1
 
Most of our contracts include negotiated fuel surcharges, typically tied to either On-Highway Diesel (OHD) or West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil (WTI).  Approximately 90% of our revenue base is covered by these negotiated fuel surcharges, with more than halfover 75% tied to OHD. In the thirdfirst quarter and first nine months of 2017,2019, contracts tied to OHD accounted for about 90%95% of our fuel surcharge revenue, as price levels were below most of our surcharge trigger points in contracts tied to WTI.revenue. Revenues associated with these surcharges totaled $84$153 million and $67$131 million in the thirdfirst quarters of 20172019 and 2016, respectively, and $249 million and $166 million for the first nine months of 2017 and 2016,2018, respectively.
 
Merchandise
 
Merchandise revenue increased for both periods reflectinggrew in the first quarter, as higher average revenue per unit was driven by pricing gains. Total merchandisegains and increased fuel surcharge revenue. Overall volumes were down less than 1% in both periodsfell, as gains in the metals and construction group and paper, clay, and forestagriculture products in the third quarter were more than offset by declines in automotive and chemicals traffic.the remaining groups.


Chemicals volume declined in both periods,decreased driven by reduced shipments of liquefied petroleum gas, crude oil, from the Bakken oil fields and lower shipments of coal ash,plastics partially offset by gains in municipal waste and petroleum shipments.

Agriculture products volume rose, as increases in corn and feed shipments more shipments of higher-rated plastics. The first nine months were also impacted by decreased shipments of liquefied petroleum gas, partiallythan offset by increased rock salt shipmentsdeclines in ethanol, primarily due to weather and replenishing of stockpiles.

One of our chemical customers, Sunbelt, filed a rate reasonableness complaint before the STB alleging that our tariff rates for transportation of regulated movements are unreasonable. Since April 1, 2011, we have been billing and collecting amounts based on the challenged tariff rates. In 2014, the STB resolved this rate reasonableness complaint in our favor and in June 2016, the STB resolved petitions for reconsideration. The matter remains decided in our favor; however, the findings are still subject to appeal. We believe the estimate of any reasonably possible loss will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. With regard to rate cases, we record adjustments to revenuessevere flooding in the periods ifMidwest, and when such adjustments are probable and reasonably estimable.wheat traffic.

Agriculture, consumer products, and government volume was flat in the third quarter and down in the first nine months, reflecting lower ethanol shipments, partially offset by increased fertilizer and corn shipments.


Metals and construction volume grew in both periods, afell, largely the result of increased frac sand shipments for usedecreases in natural gas drilling in the Marcellus, Utica, and Permian regions and higher iron and steel shipments driven by continued improvement in construction activity. These increases weretraffic, partially offset by declines in coil and cement traffic,higher aggregate shipments due to customer sourcing changes.an extended shipping season.


Automotive volume declined in both periods, driven mainly byas a result of decreases in U.S. light vehicle production.

Paper, clay,production and forest products volume increased in the third quarter and decreased in the first nine months. Both periods reflected higher pulp and municipal waste shipments as a result of increased consumer demand and growth with existing customers, partially offset by lower woodchip volumerailcar availability, due to customer sourcing changes. The first nine months were also impacted by lower pulpboarddisruptions across the U.S. multilevel network.

Forest and consumer volume due to increased truck competition.declined, reflecting decreases in kaolin, lumber, and graphic paper traffic.


Merchandise revenues for the remainder of the year are expected to increase comparedcontinue to last year,be higher year-over-year, reflecting higher average revenue per unit, driven by pricing gains, and higher volumes.gains.



22


Intermodal
 
Intermodal revenuesrevenue increased, for both periods due todriven by higher traffic volumes and average revenue per unit, primarily driven bya result of pricing gains and higherincreased fuel surcharges.surcharge revenues, as well as volume growth.


Intermodal units (in thousands) by market were as follows:
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change
            
Domestic662.6
 616.2
 8% 1,890.6
 1,775.8
 6%656.3
 671.7
 (2%)
International372.6
 377.3
 (1%) 1,123.1
 1,098.6
 2%414.7
 377.5
 10%
            
Total1,035.2
 993.5
 4% 3,013.7
 2,874.4
 5%1,071.0
 1,049.2
 2%


Domestic volume increases in both periods were thevolumes fell as a result of continued highway conversions, growth in existing accounts, and market share gains. International volume declined slightlyinclement winter weather in the third quarter. DemandMidwest and trailer lane rationalizations. International volumes rose due to increased demand from existing customers and new business awards drove the increase in the first nine months.accounts.


Intermodal revenues for the remainder of the year are expected to increase comparedcontinue to last year,increase, driven by volume growth andin addition to higher average revenue per unit due to higher fuel surcharge revenues and pricing gains.


Coal
 
Coal revenues increased in both periods, a result of higher volumes, primarily in the export market, andwere relatively flat, as higher average revenue per unit, the result of pricing gains. The first nine months were also impactedgains, was tempered by higher fuel surcharge revenue.volume decreases.
 
Coal tonnage (in thousands) by market was as follows:
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change
            
Utility17,410
 18,357
 (5%) 52,599
 48,097
 9%15,755
 15,865
 (1%)
Export6,280
 2,567
 145% 19,189
 9,949
 93%6,388
 7,238
 (12%)
Domestic metallurgical4,298
 3,816
 13% 11,647
 10,355
 12%2,931
 3,147
 (7%)
Industrial1,457
 1,589
 (8%) 4,259
 4,785
 (11%)1,222
 1,260
 (3%)
            
Total29,445
 26,329
 12% 87,694
 73,186
 20%26,296
 27,510
 (4%)
 
Utility coal tonnage decreased in the third quarter, butwas relatively flat as volume declines due to plant outages and inclement weather were offset by higher volumes from increased in the first nine months. The third quarter drop was driven primarily by weakenednetwork velocity and demand for coal driven by sustainedto replenish low natural gas prices and plant outages. Market share gains contributed to the increase in the first nine months.stockpiles. Export coal tonnage grew significantly over

prior periods,dropped as a continued tighteningresult of internationala decline in coal supply drove incremental production increasesavailability and higher demand for U.S. coal.weak thermal seaborne pricing. Domestic metallurgical coal tonnage rose as customer-specific gains more than offset supply issues driven by increased demand in the export markets in both periods.fell due to customer sourcing changes and plant outages. Industrial coal tonnage fell in both periods, reflecting continueddecreased as a result of customer sourcing changes and pressure from natural gas conversions and customer sourcing changes.conversions.
 
Coal revenues for the remainder of the year are expected to decline.   Utility demand continues to be slightly above last year primarily due to export volume increases, partially offsetimpacted by lower natural gas prices.  Export will be impacted by a lower average revenue per unit, mainly the result of softening seaborne metallurgical prices, and reduced volume due to negative mix.weak thermal seaborne pricing and supply issues.



23


Railway Operating Expenses


Railway operating expenses ($ in millions) summarized by major classifications were as follows:follows ($ in millions):
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change
            
Compensation and benefits$755
 $691
 9% $2,201
 $2,081
 6%$727
 $737
 (1%)
Purchased services and rents377
 386
 (2%) 1,146
 1,149
 424
 401
 6%
Fuel198
 181
 9% 601
 504
 19%250
 266
 (6)%
Depreciation265
 258
 3% 788
 767
 3%283
 272
 4%
Materials and other164
 188
 (13%) 574
 584
 (2%)190
 206
 (8%)
            
Total$1,759
 $1,704
 3% $5,310
 $5,085
 4%$1,874
 $1,882
 


Compensation and benefits expense increased in both periods, reflecting changes in:decreased as follows:

incentive and stock-based compensation (up $47 million for the quarter and $70 million for the first nine months),
health and welfare benefit rates for agreement employees (up $16 million for the quarter and $46 million for the first nine months),
pay rates (up $13 million for the quarter and $49 million for the first nine months), and
employment levels (down $26 million for the quarter$11 million),
higher capitalized labor ($8 million),
overtime and $57 million for the first nine months)recrews (down $6 million),
payroll taxes on stock-based compensation (down $4 million),
other (down $1 million), and
increased pay rates (up $20 million).


Average rail headcount for the quarter was down by about 1,100175 compared with third-quarter 2016the first quarter 2018 and approximately 300down by about 375 sequentially. We expect that headcount for the remainder of the year will continue to enter 2018 with employment levels flatdecline and that our year-end headcount will be down at least 500 as compared to slightly higher than third-quarter 2017.prior year.


Purchased services and rents decreased for both periodsincreased as follows ($ in millions):
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change
            
Purchased services$309
 $312
 (1%) $931
 $921
 1%$346
 $318
 9%
Equipment rents68
 74
 (8%) 215
 228
 (6%)78
 83
 (6%)
            
Total$377
 $386
 (2%) $1,146
 $1,149
 $424
 $401
 6%


The declinerise in equipment rents in both periods ispurchased services was largely the result of higher intermodal-related costs, increased technology-related expenses, and lower automotive volumes and improvedearnings in equity affiliates. Equipment rents fell, the result of increased network fluidity. Purchased services decreased slightly in the third quarter. The increase for the first nine months was due to higher intermodal volume-related costs.velocity.


Fuel expense, which includes the cost of locomotive fuel as well as other fuel used in railway operations, increased for both periods,decreased primarily due to higherlower locomotive fuel prices (up 12% in the third quarter and 22% in the first nine months)(down 4%), offset in part by improved locomotive fuel efficiency (consumption was 2% lower during the third quarter and first nine months despite the 4% and 5% increases in traffic volume, respectively)as well as decreased consumption (down 1%).







24


Materials and other expenses declined in the third quarter and for the first nine monthsdecreased as follows ($ in millions):  
Third Quarter First Nine MonthsFirst Quarter
2017 2016 % change 2017 2016 % change2019 2018 % change
            
Materials$85
 $102
 (17%) $264
 $273
 (3%)$87
 $90
 (3%)
Casualties and other claims39
 36
 8% 114
 101
 13%49
 47
 4%
Other40
 50
 (20%) 196
 210
 (7%)54
 69
 (22%)
            
Total$164
 $188
 (13%) $574
 $584
 (2%)$190
 $206
 (8%)


Material usageMaterials costs decreased in both periods, a result ofdue primarily to lower locomotive and freight car repairs.repair costs. Casualties and other claims expenses include the estimatesincreased, largely a result of higher costs related to personal injury, property damage, and environmental remediation matters. Cost associated with personal injury increased in the third quarter and first nine months as a result of unfavorable developments in personal injury cases.matters, partially offset by lower derailment-related costs. Other expense decreases in both periods reflectdecreased, reflecting higher gains from the sale of operating properties.property.


Other Income – Net


Other income – net decreased $6increased $36 million in the thirdfirst quarter but rose $30 millionprimarily driven by higher investment returns on corporate-owned life insurance.

Income Taxes
The first-quarter effective tax rate was 21.4% compared with 21.9% for the first nine months compared with the same periodsperiod last year.  Both periods reflect favorable tax benefits on stock-based compensation. The decline in the third quarter was driven by lowercurrent year also benefited from higher returns on corporate-owned life insurance, and debt exchange fees, partially offsetwhile the prior year included benefits of certain 2017 tax credits enacted retroactively by higher gains from the saleBipartisan Budget Act of non-operating properties. The first nine months increase was a result of the absence of advisory fees incurred last year, increased income associated with our coal mining properties, and higher returns from corporate-owned life insurance.

Provision for Income Taxes
The third-quarter and year-to-date effective income tax rates were 36.8% and 35.7%, compared with 34.8% and 35.5% for the same periods last year. The higher effective tax rate for the quarter was due to Illinois-enacted legislation which increased deferred tax expense by $12 million.

2018.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
 
Cash provided by operating activities, our principal source of liquidity, was $2.5 billion$881 million for the first ninethree months of 2017,2019, compared with $2.3 billion$816 million for the same period of 2016, largely2018, primarily the result of improved operating results.results partially offset by increased interest payments. We had a working capital deficitdeficits of $414$963 million at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, compared to $48with $729 million at December 31, 2016.2018. Cash, and cash equivalents, and restricted cash totaled $724$499 million at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019. We expect cash on hand combined with cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to meet our ongoing obligations.

In May of 2017, we issued $300 million of 3.15% senior notes due 2027. In August of 2017, we issued$750 million of 4.050% senior notes due 2052 as part of a debt exchange for $551 million of previously issued notes (See Note 6). Other than these items, there There have been no material changes to the information on future contractual obligations contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018 with the exception of additional lease obligations (see Note 8).


Cash used in investing activities was $1.2 billion$350 million for the first ninethree months of 2017,2019, compared with $1.3 billion$371 million in the same period last year, the decrease driven primarily due to lower corporate-owned life insurance investments.reflecting increased property sale proceeds partially offset by higher property additions.


Cash used in financing activities was $1.5 billion$478 million in the first ninethree months of 2017,2019, compared with $1.1 billion$63 million in the same period last year, primarilylargely the result of lower debt proceeds from borrowing and higher repurchases of common stock.Common Stock. We repurchased 6.02.9 million shares of Common Stock, totaling $712$500 million, in the first ninethree months of 2017,2019, compared to 7.22.1 million shares, totaling $603$300 million, in the same period last year.  On September 26, 2017, our Board of

Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 50 million shares of Common stock through December 31, 2022.  The timing and volume of future share repurchases will be guided by our assessment of market conditions and other pertinent factors.  Any near-term purchases under the program are expected to be made with internally generatedinternally-generated cash, cash on hand, or proceeds from borrowings. 


Our total debt-to-totaltotal-debt-to-total capitalization ratio was 43.7%42.7% at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and 45.1%42.0% at December 31, 2016.2018.


We have in place and available a $750 million credit agreement expiring in May 2021, which provides for borrowings at prevailing rates and includes covenants. We had no amounts outstanding under this facility at both September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and December 31, 2016,2018, and are in compliance with all of its covenants. We have a $350$400 million accounts

25


account receivable securitization program expiring June 2018. There was $100 million and $200in May 2019. We had $250 million outstanding under this program at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, and no amounts outstanding at December 31, 2016, respectively.2018. 


APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATESPOLICIES
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and assumptions may require significant judgment about matters that are inherently uncertain, and future events are likely to occur that may require us to make changes to these estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, we regularly review these estimates and assumptions based on historical experience, changes in the business environment, and other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  We regularly discuss the development, selection, and disclosures concerning critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. There have been no significant changes to the application of the critical accounting estimatespolicies disclosure contained in our Form 10-K at December 31, 2016.2018. 


OTHER MATTERS
 
Labor Agreements


Approximately 80% of our railroad employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements with various labor unions.  Pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, (the Act), these agreements remain in effect until new agreements are reached, or until the bargaining procedures mandated by the Railway Labor Act are completed.  We largely bargain nationally in concert with other major railroads, represented by the National Carriers Conference Committee (NCCC).Committee.  Moratorium provisions in the labor agreements govern when the railroads and unions may propose changes to the agreements.

Beginning in late 2014, the NCCC and the various unions exchanged new proposals to begin the current round of national negotiations.  The unions have formed three separate bargaining coalitions. The NCCC has reached a tentative agreement with one coalition that represents approximately 60% of the unionized workforce. That agreement is subject to ratification by the union membership. Negotiations with the other two coalitions are ongoing with the assistance of mediators from the National Mediation Board. Separately, in January 2015, we reached an agreement covering wages and work rules through 2019 with the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET), which represents approximately 20% of our union workforce.  Changes to the BLET benefit plan are covered by the national tentative agreement currently pending membership ratification.


New Accounting Pronouncements


For a detailed discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see Note 10.12.


Inflation


In preparing financial statements, GAAP requires the use of historical cost that disregards the effects of inflation on the replacement cost of property.  We areAs a capital-intensive company with most of our capital invested in long-lived assets.  The replacement cost of these assets, as well as the related depreciation expense, would be substantially greater than the amounts reported on the basis of historical cost.



26


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Certain statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended.  These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or our achievements or those of our industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements.  In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “consider,” “predict,” “potential,” “feel,” or other comparable terminology.  We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates, beliefs, and projections.  While we believe these expectations, assumptions, estimates, beliefs, and projections are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which involve factors or circumstances that are beyond our control.  These and other important factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” in our latest Form 10-K, as well as our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.  The forward-looking statements herein are made only as of the date they were first issued, and unless otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.  Copies of our press releases and additional information about us is available at www.norfolksouthern.com, or you can contact Norfolk Southern Corporationour Investor Relations department by calling 757-629-2861.


Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
The information required by this item is included in Part I, Item 2,“Management’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” under the heading “Financial Condition and Liquidity.”
 
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the assistance of management, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act)) at September 30, 2017.March 31, 2019.  Based on such evaluation, our officers have concluded that, at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information required to be included in our periodic filings under the Exchange Act.


Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
During the thirdfirst quarter of 2017,2019, we implemented controls to support the adoption of the new lease accounting standard ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” We have not identified any other changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



27



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.
 
On November 6,In 2007, various antitrust class actions filed against us and other Class I railroads in various Federal district courts regarding fuel surcharges were consolidated in the District of Columbia by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. On June 21,In 2012, the court certified the case as a class action. The defendant railroads appealed this certification, and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the District Court’s decision and remanded the case for further consideration. On October 10, 2017, the District Court denied class certification.certification; the findings are subject to appeal. We believe the allegations in the complaints are without merit and intend to vigorously defend the cases. We do not believe the outcome of these proceedings will have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.


Item 1A. Risk Factors.
 
The risk factors included in our 20162018 Form 10-K remain unchanged and are incorporated herein by reference.


Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
  
(a) Total
Number
of Shares
(or Units)
 
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
(c) Total
Number of
Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
 
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units)
that may yet be
purchased under
the Plans or
 
Period 
Purchased (1)
 (or Unit) 
Programs (2)
 
Programs (2)
 
          
July 1-31, 2017 602,443
 119.18
 602,443
 10,664,429
 
August 1-31, 2017 1,110,444
 117.34
 1,109,602
 9,554,827
 
September 1-30, 2017 847,742
 127.51
 846,969
 58,707,858
 
          
Total 2,560,629
  
 2,559,014
  
 
  
(a) Total
Number
of Shares
(or Units)
 
(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share
 
(c) Total
Number of
Shares
(or Units)
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
 
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate
Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units)
that may yet be
purchased under
the Plans or
 
Period 
Purchased (1)
 (or Unit) 
Programs (2)
 
Programs (2)
 
          
January 1-31, 2019 1,089,814
 160.66
 1,089,201
 38,278,718
 
February 1-28, 2019 928,331
 177.68
 921,840
 37,356,878
 
March 1-31, 2019 894,511
 180.45
 893,393
 36,463,485
 
          
Total 2,912,656
  
 2,904,434
  
 
 
(1) 
Of this amount, 1,6158,222 represent shares tendered by employees in connection with the exercise of options under the stockholder-approved Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2) 
On September 26, 2017, our Board of Directors authorized a sharethe repurchase program, pursuantof up to which up toan additional 50 million shares of Common Stock could be purchased through December 31, 2022. As of March 31, 2019, 36.5 million shares remain authorized for repurchase.



28



Item 6. Exhibits.
 
 
4.1
3(ii)

  
4.210.1

10.1*,**
  
10.2*10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5*,**
10.6*,**
10.7*,**
10.8*

  
31-A**
  
31-B**
  
32**
  
101**The following financial information from Norfolk Southern Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the thirdfirst quarter of 2017,2019, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL)(iXBRL) includes (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the thirdfirst quarter of 2019 and first nine months of 2017 and 2016;2018; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the thirdfirst quarter of 2019 and first nine months of 2017 and 2016;2018; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2016;2018; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the first ninethree months of 20172019 and 2016;2018; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the first quarter of 2019 and (v)2018; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
  
*   Management contract or compensatory arrangement.
** Filed herewith.









29



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
  
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Registrant
   
   
   
Date:October 25, 2017April 24, 2019/s/ Thomas E. HurlbutJason A. Zampi
  
Thomas E. HurlbutJason A. Zampi
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) (Signature)
   
   
Date:October 25, 2017April 24, 2019/s/ Denise W. Hutson
  
Denise W. Hutson
Corporate Secretary (Signature)


2730