UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016

o☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from____________ to___________

Commission File Number: 000-12896

OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

VIRGINIA	54-1265373
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1 West Mellen Street, Hampton, Virginia 23663

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(757) 728-1200

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ■☒ Yes o☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ■☒ Yes o☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o☐	Accelerated filer o☐

Non-accelerated filer o☐	Smaller reporting company ■☒
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o☐ Yes ■☒ No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

4,959,009 shares of common stock ($5.00 par value) outstanding as of ~~April 30,~~July 29, 2016

OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income Three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited) Six Months June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited) Six Months June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity ~~Three~~Six Months ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ~~Three~~Six Months ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28 31

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	36 43

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	37 44

	PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	38 45

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	38 45

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	38 45

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	38 45

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	38 45

Item 5.	Other Information	38 45

Item 6.	Exhibits	39 46

	Signatures	39 46

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(dollars in thousands except per share data)						(dollars in thousands except per share data)
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	12,278		$	33,514		$	28,974		$	33,514
Interest-bearing due from banks		344			1,064			1,722			1,064
Federal funds sold		638			2,412			1,520			2,412
Cash and cash equivalents		13,260			36,990			32,216			36,990
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		194,454			214,192			166,216			214,192
Restricted securities		970			2,016			2,882			2,016
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $7,802 and $7,738		565,673			560,737
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $7,934 and $7,738								590,227			560,737
Premises and equipment, net		40,996			41,282			40,285			41,282
Bank-owned life insurance		24,626			24,411			24,843			24,411
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance of $2,209 and $2,549		2,243			2,741
Other real estate owned, net of valuation allowance of $2,046 and $2,549								1,887			2,741
Other assets		14,625			14,418			39,117			14,418
Total assets	$	856,847		$	896,787		$	897,673		$	896,787

Liabilities & Stockholders' Equity

Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	205,165		$	215,090		$	206,815		$	215,090
Savings deposits		311,422			321,370			311,932			321,370
Time deposits		208,092			210,011			208,254			210,011
Total deposits		724,679			746,471			727,001			746,471
Overnight repurchase agreements		31,778			25,950			23,865			25,950
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		0			25,000			45,000			25,000
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		6,174			6,190			5,874			6,190
Total liabilities		762,631			803,611			801,740			803,611

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $5/share par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,959,009 shares issued and outstanding		24,795			24,795			24,795			24,795
Additional paid-in capital		16,392			16,392			16,392			16,392
Retained earnings		55,676			55,151			55,732			55,151
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net		(2,647	)		(3,162	)		(986	)		(3,162	)
Total stockholders' equity		94,216			93,176			95,933			93,176
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	856,847		$	896,787		$	897,673		$	896,787

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 1 -

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016			2015		2016			2015
	(unaudited, in thousands except share and per share data)				(unaudited, dollars in thousands except per share data)
Interest and Dividend Income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	6,413	$	6,355	$	6,560		$	6,485	$	12,973		$	12,840
Interest on due from banks		4		7		1			3		5			10
Interest on federal funds sold		1		0		1			1		2			1
Interest on securities:
Taxable		548		686		471			615		1,019			1,301
Tax-exempt		384		423		376			415		760			838
Dividends and interest on all other securities		15		33		26			31		41			64
Total interest and dividend income		7,365		7,504		7,435			7,550		14,800			15,054

Interest Expense:
Interest on savings deposits		55		52		54			57		109			109
Interest on time deposits		517		528		517			544		1,034			1,072
Interest on federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings		6		8		8			8		14			16
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		141		305		3			309		144			614
Total interest expense		719		893		582			918		1,301			1,811
Net interest income		6,646		6,611		6,853			6,632		13,499			13,243
Provision for loan losses		150		275		1,250			25		1,400			300
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses		6,496		6,336		5,603			6,607		12,099			12,943

Noninterest Income:
Income from fiduciary activities		901		980		877			914		1,778			1,894
Service charges on deposit accounts		975		982		1,021			994		1,996			1,976
Other service charges, commissions and fees		1,018		1,005		1,033			1,058		2,051			2,063
Income from bank-owned life insurance		215		221		217			222		432			443
Income from Old Point Mortgage						80			125		89			158
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities, net		509		0		6			0		515			0
Other operating income		47		89		52			46		90			102
Total noninterest income		3,665		3,277		3,286			3,359		6,951			6,636

Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,154		5,049		4,890			5,057		10,044			10,106
Occupancy and equipment		1,358		1,327		1,390			1,304		2,748			2,631
Data processing		422		358		435			407		857			765
FDIC insurance		165		147		156			153		321			300
Customer development		150		154		154			161		304			315
Legal and audit expenses		202		114		295			160		497			274
Other outside service fees		183		114		178			195		361			309
Employee professional development		148		131		179			162		327			293
Capital stock tax		135		114		127			111		262			225
ATM and check losses		87		137		83			142		170			279
Prepayment fee on Federal Home Loan Bank advance		391		0		0			0		391			0
Loss on write-down/sale of other real estate owned		99		69		9			3		108			72
Other operating expenses		597		573		589			639		1,186			1,212
Total noninterest expense		9,091		8,287		8,485			8,494		17,576			16,781
Income before income taxes		1,070		1,326		404			1,472		1,474			2,798
Income tax expense		49		121
Income tax expense (benefit)						(148	)		193		(99	)		314
Net income	$	1,021	$	1,205	$	552		$	1,279	$	1,573		$	2,484

Basic earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding		4,959,009		4,959,009		4,959,009			4,959,009		4,959,009			4,959,009
Net income per share of common stock	$	0.21	$	0.24	$	0.11		$	0.26	$	0.32		$	0.50

Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average shares outstanding		4,959,009		4,959,009		4,959,009			4,959,009		4,959,009			4,959,009
Net income per share of common stock	$	0.21	$	0.24	$	0.11		$	0.26	$	0.32		$	0.50

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 2 -

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015			2016		2015
	(unaudited, in thousands)				(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
Net income	$	1,021	$	1,205	$	552	$	1,279		$	1,573	$	2,484
Other comprehensive income, net of tax, net of tax
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		515		91
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities						1,661		(1,002	)		2,176		(911	)
Amortization of unrealized losses on securities transferred to held-to-maturity		0		141		0		170			0		311
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		515		232
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax						1,661		(832	)		2,176		(600	)
Comprehensive income	$	1,536	$	1,437	$	2,213	$	447		$	3,749	$	1,884

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 3 -

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

	Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total				Shares of Common Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
	(unaudited, dollars in thousands except per share data)																(unaudited, dollars in thousands except per share data)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2016
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016																SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

Balance at beginning of period		4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	55,151		$	(3,162	)	$	93,176				4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	55,151		$	(3,162	)	$	93,176
Net income		0		0		0		1,021			0			1,021				0		0		0		1,573			0			1,573
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		0		0		0		0			515			515				0		0		0		0			2,176			2,176
Cash dividends ($0.10 per share)		0		0		0		(496	)		0			(496	)
Cash dividends ($0.20 per share)																		0		0		0		(992	)		0			(992	)

Balance at end of period		4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	55,676		$	(2,647	)	$	94,216				4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	55,732		$	(986	)	$	95,933


THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015																SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015

Balance at beginning of period		4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	53,203		$	(5,893	)	$	88,497				4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	53,203		$	(5,893	)	$	88,497
Net income		0		0		0		1,205			0			1,205				0		0		0		2,484			0			2,484
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		0		0		0		0			232			232
Cash dividends ($0.08 per share)		0		0		0		(396	)		0			(396	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax																		0		0		0		0			(600	)		(600	)
Cash dividends ($0.16 per share)																		0		0		0		(793	)		0			(793	)

Balance at end of period		4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	54,012		$	(5,661	)	$	89,538				4,959,009	$	24,795	$	16,392	$	54,894		$	(6,493	)	$	89,588

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 4 -

Old Point Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Three Months Ended March 31,	2016			2015
							Six Months Ended June 30,
							2016			2015
	(unaudited, in thousands)						(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	1,021		$	1,205		$	1,573		$	2,484
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		667			628			1,349			1,257
Provision for loan losses		150			275			1,400			300
Net gain on sale of available-for-sale securities		(509	)		0			(515	)		0
Net amortization of securities		514			536			1,060			1,111
Net (gain) loss on disposal of premises and equipment		(10	)		1			(3	)		1
Net loss on write-down/sale of other real estate owned		99			69			108			72
Income from bank owned life insurance		(215	)		(221	)		(432	)		(443	)
Deferred tax expense								122			138
Increase in other assets		(472	)		(251	)		(1,459	)		(5,034	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(16	)		542			(316	)		4,061
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,229			2,784			2,887			3,947

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(61,690	)		(21,362	)		(83,098	)		(42,381	)
Proceeds from redemption (cash used in purchases) of restricted securities		1,046			(11	)
Cash used in purchases of restricted securities								(866	)		(573	)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities		20,740			20,690			41,765			40,690
Proceeds from maturities and calls of held-to-maturity securities								0			300
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities		58,361			1,155			61,680			2,055
Paydowns on available-for-sale securities		3,102			2,367			5,899			4,918
Paydowns on held-to-maturity securities		0			1,725			0			4,021
Purchases of government-guaranteed student loans								0			(14,315	)
Net increase in all other loans (including repayments on student loans)		(5,086	)		(19,634	)		(30,890	)		(21,662	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		399			406			924			522
Payments for improvements to other real estate owned								(52	)		0
Purchases of premises and equipment		(371	)		(973	)		(476	)		(1,048	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		16,501			(15,637	)
Net cash used in investing activities								(5,114	)		(27,473	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits		(9,925	)		6,316
Decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits								(8,275	)		(1,315	)
Increase (decrease) in savings deposits		(9,948	)		2,710			(9,438	)		9,975
Increase (decrease) in time deposits		(1,919	)		2,646
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings, net		5,828			(1,857	)
Decrease in time deposits								(1,757	)		(1,654	)
Decrease in federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings, net								(2,085	)		(9,936	)
Increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances								55,000			20,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances		(25,000	)		0			(35,000	)		(5,000	)
Cash dividends paid on common stock		(496	)		(396	)		(992	)		(793	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(41,460	)		9,419			(2,547	)		11,277

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(23,730	)		(3,434	)		(4,774	)		(12,249	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		36,990			33,305			36,990			33,305
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	13,260		$	29,871		$	32,216		$	21,056

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	740		$	887		$	1,322		$	1,815
Income tax	$	0		$	0		$	0		$	200

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH TRANSACTIONS
Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale	$	780		$	138
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale							$	3,297		$	(1,381	)
Loans transferred to other real estate owned	$	0		$	454		$	0		$	454
Former bank building transferred from fixed assets to other real estate owned							$	127		$	0
Amortization of unrealized loss on securities transferred to held-to-maturity	$	0		$	214		$	0		$	471
Securities sold but not settled							$	24,483		$	0

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 5 -

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1. General

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Old Point Financial Corporation (the Company) and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments and reclassifications of a normal and recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly the financial ~~positions~~position at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, ~~and~~ the statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and the statements of changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K. Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation, none of which were material in nature.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank) and Old Point Trust & Financial Services N.A. (Trust). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where the Company holds 20 to 50 percent of the voting rights, or has the ability to exercise significant influence, or both, are accounted for under the equity method. As discussed below, the Company consolidates entities deemed to be variable interest entities (VIEs) when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Old Point Financial Corporation is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its operations through two subsidiaries, The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus and Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N.A. The Bank serves individual and commercial customers, the majority of which are in Hampton Roads, Virginia. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Bank had 18 branch offices. The Bank offers a full range of deposit and loan products to its retail and commercial customers. Trust offers a full range of services for individuals and businesses. Products and services include retirement planning, estate planning, financial planning, estate and trust administration, retirement plan administration, tax services and investment management services.

VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

A legal entity is referred to as a VIE if any of the following conditions exist, which are outlined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) variable interest accounting guidance (FASB ASC 810-10-15-14): (1) the total equity investment at risk is insufficient to permit the legal entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or (2) the entity has equity investors that cannot make significant decisions about the entity's operations or that do not absorb their proportionate share of the expected losses or receive the expected returns of the entity.

- 6 -

Note 2. Securities

Amortized costs and fair values of securities available-for-sale as of the dates indicated are as follows:

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(in thousands)									(in thousands)
March 31, 2016
U.S. Treasury securities	$	19,999	$	0	$	0		$	19,999
June 30, 2016
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		4,071		1		(50	)		4,022	$	24,270	$	5	$	0		$	24,275
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		71,958		1,161		(127	)		72,992		70,669		2,065		0			72,734
Mortgage-backed securities		94,511		0		(1,092	)		93,419		64,533		339		(15	)		64,857
Money market investments		511		0		0			511		621		0		0			621
Corporate bonds and other securities		3,397		17		(3	)		3,411		3,598		27		(1	)		3,624
Other marketable equity securities		100		0		0			100		100		5		0			105
Total	$	194,547	$	1,179	$	(1,272	)	$	194,454	$	163,791	$	2,441	$	(16	)	$	166,216

December 31, 2015
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies	$	24,353	$	1	$	(114	)	$	24,240	$	24,353	$	1	$	(114	)	$	24,240
Obligations of state and political subdivisions		77,223		1,323		(113	)		78,433		77,223		1,323		(113	)		78,433
Mortgage-backed securities		109,360		0		(1,964	)		107,396		109,360		0		(1,964	)		107,396
Money market investments		631		0		0			631		631		0		0			631
Corporate bonds and other securities		3,397		4		(8	)		3,393		3,397		4		(8	)		3,393
Other marketable equity securities		100		0		(1	)		99		100		0		(1	)		99
Total	$	215,064	$	1,328	$	(2,200	)	$	214,192	$	215,064	$	1,328	$	(2,200	)	$	214,192

The following table summarizes realized gains and losses on the sale of investment securities during the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	March 31,					June 30,						June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015			2016				2015
Securities Available-for-sale
Realized gains on sales of securities	$	548		$	0		$	6		$	0		$	554			$	0
Realized losses on sales of securities		(39	)		0			0			0			(39	)			0
Net realized gain (loss)	$	509		$	0
Net realized gain							$	6		$	0		$	515			$	0

OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES

Management assesses whether the Company intends to sell or it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell a security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit losses. For debt securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired and that the Company does not intend to sell and will not be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis, the Company separates the amount of the impairment into the amount that is credit related (credit loss component) and the amount due to all other factors. The credit loss component is recognized in earnings and is the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and the present value of its expected future cash flows. The remaining difference between the security's fair value and the present value of expected future cash flows is due to factors that are not credit related, which are recognized in other comprehensive income.

The present value of expected future cash flows is determined using the best-estimate cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit to the security at the date of purchase or the current yield to accrete an asset-backed or floating rate security. The methodology and assumptions for establishing the best-estimate cash flows vary depending on the type of security. The asset-backed securities cash flow estimates are based on bond specific facts and circumstances that may include collateral characteristics, expectations of delinquency and default rates, loss severity and prepayment speeds, and structural support, including subordination and guarantees.

- 7 -

The Company has a process in place to identify debt securities that could potentially have a credit or interest-rate related impairment that is other-than-temporary. This process involves monitoring late payments, pricing levels, downgrades by rating agencies, key financial ratios, financial statements, revenue forecasts, and cash flow projections as indicators of credit issues. On a quarterly basis, management reviews all securities to determine whether an other-than-temporary decline in value exists and whether losses should be recognized. Management considers relevant facts and circumstances in evaluating whether a credit or interest-rate related impairment of a security is other-than-temporary. Relevant facts and circumstances considered include: (a) the extent and length of time the fair value has been below cost; (b) the reasons for the decline in value; (c) the financial position and access to capital of the issuer, including the current and future impact of any specific events; and (d) for fixed maturity securities, the Company's intent to sell a security or whether it is more-likely-than-not the Company will be required to sell the security before the recovery of its amortized cost which, in some cases, may extend to maturity, and for equity securities, the Company's ability and intent to hold the security for a period of time that allows for the recovery in value.

The Company has not recorded impairment charges through income on securities for the three or six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 or ~~the year ended December 31,~~ 2015.

TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED SECURITIES

The following table shows the number of securities with unrealized losses, and the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company's investments with unrealized losses that are deemed to be temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2016																			June 30, 2016
	Less Than Twelve Months						More Than Twelve Months					Total								Less Than Twelve Months						More Than Twelve Months						Total
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Number of Securities		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value			Number of Securities
	(dollars in thousands)																			(dollars in thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale																				Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		$	0		$	0		$	50	$	3,721		$	50		$	3,721		2
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			87			5,432			40		3,043			127			8,475		15
Mortgage-backed securities			254			31,813			838		61,606			1,092			93,419		18		$	15			4,062		$	0		$	0	$	15		$	4,062		1
Corporate bonds			0			0			3		697			3			697		6			0			0			1			99		1			99		1
Total securities available-for-sale		$	341		$	37,245		$	931	$	69,067		$	1,272		$	106,312		41		$	15		$	4,062		$	1		$	99	$	16		$	4,161		2

	December 31, 2015																				December 31, 2015
	Less Than Twelve Months						More Than Twelve Months						Total								Less Than Twelve Months						More Than Twelve Months						Total
	Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Number of Securities		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Number of Securities
	(dollars in thousands)																				(dollars in thousands)
Securities Available-for-Sale																					Securities Available-for-Sale
Debt securities:
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		$	0		$	0		$	114		$	3,940		$	114		$	3,940		2		$	0		$	0		$	114		$	3,940		$	114		$	3,940		2
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			42			4,177			71			3,545			113			7,722		13			42			4,177			71			3,545			113			7,722		13
Mortgage-backed securities			848			62,698			1,116			44,698			1,964			107,396		13			848			62,698			1,116			44,698			1,964			107,396		13
Corporate bonds			6			2,091			2			198			8			2,289		16			6			2,091			2			198			8			2,289		16
Other marketable equity securities			1			99			0			0			1			99		1			1			99			0			0			1			99		1
Total securities available-for-sale		$	897		$	69,065		$	1,303		$	52,381		$	2,200		$	121,446		45		$	897		$	69,065		$	1,303		$	52,381		$	2,200		$	121,446		45

- 8 -

Certain investments within the Company's portfolio had unrealized losses at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as shown in the tables above. The unrealized losses were caused by increases in market interest rates. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and management believes it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

~~- 8 -~~

Restricted Securities

The restricted security category is comprised of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) and the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). These stocks are classified as restricted securities because their ownership is restricted to certain types of entities and the securities lack a market. Therefore, FHLB and FRB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. When evaluating these stocks for impairment, their value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. Restricted stock is viewed as a long-term investment and management believes that the Company has the ability and the intent to hold this stock until its value is recovered.

Note 3. Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses

The following is a summary of the balances in each class of the Company's loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	96,473		$	96,997		$	96,892		$	96,997
Commercial		276,394			277,758			281,323			277,758
Construction		22,631			19,685			26,286			19,685
Second mortgages		15,944			15,148			16,673			15,148
Equity lines of credit		46,526			47,256			46,669			47,256
Total mortgage loans on real estate		457,968			456,844			467,843			456,844
Commercial loans		45,700			43,197			54,996			43,197
Consumer loans		48,454			50,427			44,112			50,427
Other		21,353			18,007			31,210			18,007
Total loans, net of deferred fees (1)		573,475			568,475			598,161			568,475
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(7,802	)		(7,738	)		(7,934	)		(7,738	)
Loans, net of allowance and deferred fees (1)	$	565,673		$	560,737		$	590,227		$	560,737

(1) Deferred loan fees totaled ~~$414~~$443 thousand and $407 thousand at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Overdrawn deposit accounts are reclassified as loans and included in the Other category in the table above. Overdrawn deposit accounts totaled ~~$618~~$617 thousand and $648 thousand at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

CREDIT QUALITY INFORMATION

The Company uses internally-assigned risk grades to estimate the capability of borrowers to repay the contractual obligations of their loan agreements as scheduled or at all. The Company's internal risk grade system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans. Credit risk grades are updated at least quarterly as additional information becomes available, at which time management analyzes the resulting scores to track loan performance.

The Company's internally assigned risk grades are as follows:

Pass: Loans are of acceptable risk.

Other Assets Especially Mentioned (OAEM): Loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention.

Substandard: Loans reflect significant deficiencies due to several adverse trends of a financial, economic or managerial nature.

Doubtful: Loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard loan with added characteristics that make collection or liquidation in full based on currently existing facts, conditions and values highly questionable or improbable.

Loss: Loans have been charged off because they are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted.

- 9 -

The following table presents credit quality exposures by internally assigned risk ratings as of the dates indicated:

Credit Quality Information As of March 31, 2016
Credit Quality Information As of June 30, 2016										Credit Quality Information As of June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	(in thousands)									(in thousands)
		Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Total			Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Total
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		$	94,015	$	0	$	2,458	$	96,473		$	94,796	$	0	$	2,096	$	96,892
Commercial			258,317		9,457		8,620		276,394			262,291		10,627		8,405		281,323
Construction			21,718		0		913		22,631			25,375		164		747		26,286
Second mortgages			15,607		0		337		15,944			16,346		0		327		16,673
Equity lines of credit			46,426		0		100		46,526			46,575		0		94		46,669
Total mortgage loans on real estate			436,083		9,457		12,428		457,968			445,383		10,791		11,669		467,843
Commercial loans			42,303		1,251		2,146		45,700			52,485		1,483		1,028		54,996
Consumer loans			48,371		0		83		48,454			44,035		0		77		44,112
Other			21,353		0		0		21,353			31,210		0		0		31,210
Total		$	548,110	$	10,708	$	14,657	$	573,475		$	573,113	$	12,274	$	12,774	$	598,161

Credit Quality Information As of December 31, 2015
(in thousands)
	Pass		OAEM		Substandard		Total
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	94,576	$	0	$	2,421	$	96,997
Commercial		261,749		7,394		8,615		277,758
Construction		18,931		0		754		19,685
Second mortgages		14,835		0		313		15,148
Equity lines of credit		47,161		0		95		47,256
Total mortgage loans on real estate		437,252		7,394		12,198		456,844
Commercial loans		40,268		467		2,462		43,197
Consumer loans		50,327		0		100		50,427
Other		18,007		0		0		18,007
Total	$	545,854	$	7,861	$	14,760	$	568,475

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not have any loans internally classified as Loss or Doubtful.

- 10 -

AGE ANALYSIS OF PAST DUE LOANS BY CLASS

All classes of loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Interest and fees continue to accrue on past due loans until the date the loan is placed in nonaccrual status, if applicable. The following table includes an aging analysis of the recorded investment in past due loans as of the dates indicated. Also included in the table below are loans that are 90 days or more past due as to interest and principal and still accruing interest, because they are well-secured and in the process of collection. Loans in nonaccrual status that are also past due are included in the aging categories in the table below.

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of March 31, 2016
Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of June 30, 2016																Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of June 30, 2016
		30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Current Loans (1)		Total Loans		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing			30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Current Loans ⁽¹⁾		Total Loans		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing
		(in thousands)															(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:	Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		$	912	$	267	$	207	$	1,386	$	95,087	$	96,473	$	0		$	505	$	309	$	810	$	1,624	$	95,268	$	96,892	$	520
Commercial			1,712		30		2,334		4,076		272,318		276,394		20			1,582		0		129		1,711		279,612		281,323		17
Construction			0		0		162		162		22,469		22,631		162			0		0		0		0		26,286		26,286		0
Second mortgages			57		0		156		213		15,731		15,944		0			144		0		214		358		16,315		16,673		60
Equity lines of credit			25		0		0		25		46,501		46,526		0			28		0		51		79		46,590		46,669		51
Total mortgage loans on real estate			2,706		297		2,859		5,862		452,106		457,968		182			2,259		309		1,204		3,772		464,071		467,843		648
Commercial loans			455		43		142		640		45,060		45,700		0			2		16		86		104		54,892		54,996		0
Consumer loans			1,359		688		2,903		4,950		43,504		48,454		2,903			1,191		971		2,570		4,732		39,380		44,112		2,570
Other			38		3		7		48		21,305		21,353		7			49		9		4		62		31,148		31,210		4
Total		$	4,558	$	1,031	$	5,911	$	11,500	$	561,975	$	573,475	$	3,092		$	3,501	$	1,305	$	3,864	$	8,670	$	589,491	$	598,161	$	3,222

⁽¹⁾ For purposes of this table, Total Current Loans includes loans that are 1 - 29 days past due.

In the table above, the consumer category includes student loans with principal and interest amounts that are 97 - 98% guaranteed by the federal government. The past due principal portion of these guaranteed loans totaled ~~$4.7~~$4.5 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans as of December 31, 2015
	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Total Current Loans ⁽¹⁾		Total Loans		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing
	(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	309	$	1,042	$	275	$	1,626	$	95,371	$	96,997	$	0
Commercial		1,266		31		23		1,320		276,438		277,758		23
Construction		161		0		0		161		19,524		19,685		0
Second mortgages		21		39		165		225		14,923		15,148		0
Equity lines of credit		170		0		0		170		47,086		47,256		0
Total mortgage loans on real estate		1,927		1,112		463		3,502		453,342		456,844		23
Commercial loans		500		88		232		820		42,377		43,197		164
Consumer loans		1,673		1,350		3,163		6,186		44,241		50,427		3,163
Other		64		3		6		73		17,934		18,007		6
Total	$	4,164	$	2,553	$	3,864	$	10,581	$	557,894	$	568,475	$	3,356

⁽¹⁾ For purposes of this table, Total Current Loans includes loans that are 1 - 29 days past due.

- 11 -

Although the portion of the student loan portfolio that is 90 days or more past due would normally be considered impaired, the Company does not include these loans in its impairment ~~analysis due~~analysis. Because the federal government has provided guarantees of repayment of these student loans in an amount ranging from 97% to 98% of the ~~government guarantee (which includes both~~total principal and ~~interest) and the small size~~interest of the ~~individual loans.~~

~~- 11 -~~

loans, management does not expect significant increases in past due student loans to have a material effect on the Company.

NONACCRUAL LOANS

The Company generally places commercial loans (including construction loans and commercial loans secured and not secured by real estate) in nonaccrual status when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain, part of the principal balance has been charged off and no restructuring has occurred or the loan reaches 90 days past due, unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection.

Under regulatory rules, consumer loans, which are loans to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures, and consumer loans secured by real estate (including residential 1 - 4 family mortgages, second mortgages, and equity lines of credit) are not required to be placed in nonaccrual status. Although consumer loans and consumer loans secured by real estate are not required to be placed in nonaccrual status, the Company may elect to place these loans in nonaccrual status, if necessary to avoid a material overstatement of interest income. Generally, consumer loans secured by real estate are placed in nonaccrual status only when payments are 120 days past due.

Generally, consumer loans not secured by real estate are placed in nonaccrual status only when part of the principal has been charged off. If a charge-off has not occurred sooner for other reasons, a consumer loan not secured by real estate will generally be placed in nonaccrual status when payments are 120 days past due. These loans are charged off or written down to the net realizable value of the collateral when deemed uncollectible, when classified as a "loss," when repayment is unreasonably protracted, when bankruptcy has been initiated, or when the loan is 120 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection.

When management places a loan in nonaccrual status, the accrued unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income and the loan is accounted for by the cash basis or cost recovery method, until it qualifies for return to accrual status or is charged off. Generally, loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured, or when the borrower has resumed paying the full amount of the scheduled contractual interest and principal payments for at least six months.

The following table presents loans in nonaccrual status by class of loan as of the dates indicated:

Nonaccrual Loans by Class	Nonaccrual Loans by Class					Nonaccrual Loans by Class
		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015			June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
		(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Mortgage loans on real estate
Residential 1-4 family		$	1,343	$	1,457		$	1,058	$	1,457
Commercial			4,701		2,623			2,501		2,623
Second mortgages			156		226			154		226
Total mortgage loans on real estate			6,200		4,306			3,713		4,306
Commercial loans			257		276			197		276
Total		$	6,457	$	4,582		$	3,910	$	4,582

The following table presents the interest income that the Company would have earned under the original terms of its nonaccrual loans and the actual interest recorded by the Company on nonaccrual loans for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Interest income that would have been recorded under original loan terms		$	85	$	73		$	101	$	110
Actual interest income recorded for the period			38		63			85		97
Reduction in interest income on nonaccrual loans		$	47	$	10		$	16	$	13

- 12 -

TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS

The Company's loan portfolio includes certain loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who are experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from the Company's loss mitigation activities and could include reduction in the interest rate below current market rates for borrowers with similar risk profiles, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. The Company defines a TDR as nonperforming if the TDR is in nonaccrual status or is 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest at the report date.

When the Company modifies a loan, management evaluates any possible impairment as stated in the impaired loan section below.

The following table presents TDRs during the period indicated, by class of loan. There were no troubled debts restructured in the first six months of 2015 or in the second quarter of ~~2015.~~2016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016												Troubled Debt Restructurings by Class For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands)	(dollars in thousands)											(dollars in thousands)
	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification			Recorded Investment After Modification			Current Investment on March 31, 2016			Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification			Recorded Investment After Modification			Current Investment on June 30, 2016
Commercial loans		1		$	152		$	152		$	115		1		$	152		$	152		$	110

The loan restructured in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was given a below-market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no outstanding commitments to disburse additional funds on any TDR. ~~Also at both March 31, 2016 and~~At December 31, 2015, the Company had $53 thousand in loans secured by residential 1 - 4 family real estate that were in the process of foreclosure. There were no loans loans secured by residential 1 - 4 family real estate in the process of foreclosure at June 30, 2016.

In the ~~first quarters of~~three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no defaulting TDRs where the default occurred within twelve months of restructuring. The Company considers a TDR in default when any of the following occurs: the loan, as restructured, becomes 90 days or more past due; the loan is moved to nonaccrual status following the restructure; the loan is restructured again under terms that would qualify it as a TDR if it were not already so classified; or any portion of the loan is charged off.

All TDRs are factored into the determination of the allowance for loan losses and included in the impaired loan analysis, as discussed below.

IMPAIRED LOANS

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts when due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming loans and loans modified in a TDR. When management identifies a loan as impaired, the impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except when the sole or remaining source of repayment for the loan is the operation or liquidation of the collateral. In these cases, management uses the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs, when foreclosure is probable, instead of the discounted cash flows. If management determines that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through ana specific allocation in the allowance ~~estimate~~ or a charge-off to the allowance.

When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt and the loan is in nonaccrual status, all payments are applied to principal under the cost-recovery method. For financial statement purposes, the recorded investment in the loan is the actual principal balance reduced by payments that would otherwise have been applied to interest. When reporting information on these loans to the applicable customers, the unpaid principal balance is reported as if payments were applied to principal and interest under the original terms of the loan agreements. Therefore, the unpaid principal balance reported to the customer would be higher than the recorded investment in the loan for financial statement purposes. When the ultimate collectability of the total principal of the impaired loan is not in doubt and the loan is in nonaccrual status, contractual interest is credited to interest income when received under the cash-basis method.

- 13 -

The following table includes the recorded investment and unpaid principal balances (a portion of which may have been charged off) for impaired loans with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of the dates presented. Also presented are the average recorded investments in the impaired loans and the related amount of interest recognized for the periods presented. The average balances are calculated based on daily average balances.

Impaired Loans by Class (in thousands)	Impaired Loans by Class (in thousands)																		Impaired Loans by Class (in thousands)
		As of March 31, 2016											For the three months ended March 31, 2016						As of June 30, 2016												For the six months ended June 30, 2016
				Recorded Investment																		Recorded Investment
		Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Valuation Allowance			With Valuation Allowance			Associated Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized			Unpaid Principal Balance			Without Valuation Allowance			With Valuation Allowance			Associated Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family		$	2,812		$	1,853		$	816		$	96		$	2,702		$	32		$	2,721		$	1,735		$	640		$	124		$	2,642		$	51
Commercial			10,155			6,139			3,187			588			9,307			66			10,183			6,188			3,168			463			9,353			232
Construction			98			0			98			35			98			1			633			536			97			35			366			21
Second mortgages			531			486			0			0			524			10			526			482			0			0			517			14
Total mortgage loans on real estate		$	13,596		$	8,478		$	4,101		$	719		$	12,631		$	109		$	14,063		$	8,941		$	3,905		$	622		$	12,878		$	318
Commercial loans			435			257			0			0			266			2			1,145			197			824			137			664			41
Consumer loans			11			11			0			0			12			0			0			0			0			0			6			0
Total		$	14,042		$	8,746		$	4,101		$	719		$	12,909		$	111		$	15,208		$	9,138		$	4,729		$	759		$	13,548		$	359

Impaired Loans by Class (in thousands)
	As of December 31, 2015											For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
			Recorded Investment
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Without Valuation Allowance			With Valuation Allowance			Associated Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	2,994		$	1,530		$	1,261		$	146		$	2,267		$	132
Commercial		10,203			6,166			3,208			608			9,305			473
Construction		99			0			99			36			465			5
Second mortgages		535			499			0			0			571			21
Total mortgage loans on real estate	$	13,831		$	8,195		$	4,568		$	790		$	12,608		$	631
Commercial loans		330			207			68			8			952			28
Consumer loans		12			12			0			0			13			1
Total	$	14,173		$	8,414		$	4,636		$	798		$	13,573		$	660

MONITORING OF LOANS AND EFFECT OF MONITORING FOR THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Loan officers are responsible for continual portfolio analysis and prompt identification and reporting of problem loans, which includes assigning a risk grade to each applicable loan at its origination and revising such grade as the situation dictates. Loan officers maintain frequent contact with borrowers, which should enable the loan officer to identify potential problems before other personnel. In addition, meetings with loan officers and upper management are held to discuss problem loans and review risk grades. Nonetheless, in order to avoid over-reliance upon loan officers for problem loan identification, the Company's loan review system provides for review of loans and risk grades by individuals who are independent of the loan approval process. Risk grades and historical loss rates (determined by migration analysis) by risk grades are used as a component of the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.

~~- 14 -~~

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

Management has an established methodology to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the risks and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Company segments the loan portfolio into categories as defined by Schedule RC-C of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income Form 041 (Call Report). Loans are segmented into the following pools: commercial, real estate-construction, real estate-mortgage, consumer and other loans. The Company also sub-segments the real estate-mortgage segment into four classes: residential 1-4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit.

- 14 -

The Company uses an internally developed risk evaluation model in the estimation of the credit risk process. The model and assumptions used to determine the allowance are independently validated and reviewed to ensure that the theoretical foundation, assumptions, data integrity, computational processes and reporting practices are appropriate and properly documented.

Each portfolio segment has risk characteristics as follows:

Commercial: Commercial loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business or project, in addition to other risks associated with the ownership of a business. The repayment of these loans may be dependent upon the profitability and cash flows of the business. In addition, there is risk associated with the value of collateral other than real estate which may depreciate over time and cannot be appraised with as much precision.

Real estate-construction: Construction loans carry risks that the project will not be finished according to schedule, the project will not be finished according to budget and the value of the collateral may at any point in time be less than the principal amount of the loan. Construction loans also bear the risk that the general contractor, who may or may not be the loan customer, may be unable to finish the construction project as planned because of financial pressure unrelated to the project.

Real estate-mortgage: Residential mortgage loans and equity lines of credit carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral. Commercial real estate loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business if owner occupied. If non-owner occupied, the repayment of these loans may be dependent upon the profitability and cash flow from rent receipts.

Consumer loans: Consumer loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrowers and the value of the collateral. Consumer loans are more likely than real estate loans to be immediately adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Other loans: Other loans are loans to mortgage companies, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and loans to insurance, investment and finance companies. These loans carry risks associated with the successful operation of a business. In addition, there is risk associated with the value of collateral other than real estate which may depreciate over time, depend on interest rates or fluctuate in active trading markets.

Each segment of the portfolio is pooled by risk grade or by days past due. ~~Loans~~Consumer loans not secured by real estate and made to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures are segmented into pools based on days past due, while all other loans, including loans to consumers that are secured by real estate, are segmented by risk grades. A historical loss percentage is then calculated by migration analysis and applied to each pool. The migration analysis applied to all pools is able to track the risk grading and historical performance of individual loans throughout a number of periods set by management, which provides management with information regarding trends (or migrations) in a particular loan segment. At December 31, 2015 and ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, management used twelve-quarter migration periods.

Management also provides an allocated component of the allowance for loans that are specifically identified that may be impaired, and are individually analyzed for impairment. An allocated allowance is established when the discounted present value of expected future cash flows from the impaired loan (or the collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan) is lower than the carrying value of that loan.

Based on credit risk assessments and management's analysis of qualitative factors, additional loss factors are applied to loan balances. These additional qualitative factors include: economic conditions, trends in growth, loan concentrations, changes in certain loans, changes in underwriting, changes in management and changes in the legal and regulatory environment.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES BY SEGMENT

The total allowance reflects management's estimate of ~~loan~~ losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The Company considers the allowance for loan losses of ~~$7.8~~$7.9 million adequate to cover loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

- 15 -

The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans for the periods presented. Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS	ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS																	ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES AND RECORDED INVESTMENT IN LOANS
(in thousands)	(in thousands)																	(in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016		Commercial		Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - Mortgage			Consumer			Other			Total
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016																			Commercial			Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - Mortgage ⁽¹⁾			Consumer			Other			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at the beginning of period		$	633	$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738			$	633		$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738
Charge-offs			0		0		(16	)		(73	)		(34	)		(123	)			(858	)		0		(268	)		(99	)		(62	)		(1,287	)
Recoveries			7		3		7			8			12			37				24			3		17			22			17			83
Provision for loan losses			11		145		(89	)		57			26			150				1,287			297		(496	)		198			114			1,400
Ending balance		$	651	$	1,133	$	5,530		$	271		$	217		$	7,802			$	1,086		$	1,285	$	4,881		$	400		$	282		$	7,934
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment		$	0	$	35	$	684		$	0		$	0		$	719			$	137		$	35	$	587		$	0		$	0		$	759
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment			651		1,098		4,846			271			217			7,083				949			1,250		4,294			400			282			7,175
Ending balance		$	651	$	1,133	$	5,530		$	271		$	217		$	7,802			$	1,086		$	1,285	$	4,881		$	400		$	282		$	7,934
Loan Balances:
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment		$	257	$	98	$	12,481		$	11		$	0		$	12,847			$	1,021		$	633	$	12,213		$	0		$	0		$	13,867
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment			45,443		22,533		422,856			48,443			21,353			560,628				53,975			25,653		429,344			44,112			31,210			584,294
Ending balance		$	45,700	$	22,631	$	435,337		$	48,454		$	21,353		$	573,475			$	54,996		$	26,286	$	441,557		$	44,112		$	31,210		$	598,161

For the Year Ended December 31, 2015	Commercial			Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - Mortgage			Consumer			Other			Total			Commercial			Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - Mortgage ⁽¹⁾			Consumer			Other			Total
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at the beginning of period	$	595		$	703	$	5,347		$	219		$	211		$	7,075		$	595		$	703	$	5,347		$	219		$	211		$	7,075
Charge-offs		(293	)		0		(321	)		(92	)		(191	)		(897	)		(293	)		0		(321	)		(92	)		(191	)		(897	)
Recoveries		50			1		393			39			52			535			50			1		393			39			52			535
Provision for loan losses		281			281		209			113			141			1,025			281			281		209			113			141			1,025
Ending balance	$	633		$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738		$	633		$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	8		$	36	$	754		$	0		$	0		$	798		$	8		$	36	$	754		$	0		$	0		$	798
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		625			949		4,874			279			213			6,940			625			949		4,874			279			213			6,940
Ending balance	$	633		$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738		$	633		$	985	$	5,628		$	279		$	213		$	7,738
Loan Balances:
Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	275		$	99	$	12,664		$	12		$	0		$	13,050		$	275		$	99	$	12,664		$	12		$	0		$	13,050
Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment		42,922			19,586		424,495			50,415			18,007			555,425			42,922			19,586		424,495			50,415			18,007			555,425
Ending balance	$	43,197		$	19,685	$	437,159		$	50,427		$	18,007		$	568,475		$	43,197		$	19,685	$	437,159		$	50,427		$	18,007		$	568,475

⁽¹⁾ The real estate-mortgage segment includes residential 1 – 4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING METHODOLOGY

There were no changes in the Company's accounting methodology for the allowance for loan losses in the first six months of 2016.

- 16 -

Note 4. Low-Income Housing Tax Credits

The Company was invested in 4 separate housing equity funds at both ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. The general purpose of these funds is to encourage and assist participants in investing in low-income residential rental properties located in the Commonwealth of Virginia; develop and implement strategies to maintain projects as low-income housing; deliver Federal Low Income Housing Credits to investors; allocate tax losses and other possible tax benefits to investors; and preserve and protect project assets.

The investments in these funds were recorded as other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and were ~~$4.1~~$4.0 million and $4.2 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The expected terms of these investments and the related tax benefits run through 2032. ~~During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized tax credits and other tax benefits related to these investments of $126 thousand and $118 thousand, respectively.~~ Total projected tax credits to be received for 2016 are ~~$404~~$399 thousand, which is based on the most recent quarterly estimates received from the funds. Additional capital calls expected for the funds totaled $3.0 million ~~and $3.0 million~~ at ~~March 31,~~both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, ~~respectively,~~ and are recorded in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the corresponding consolidated balance sheet.

~~- 16 -~~

The table below summarizes the tax credits and other tax benefits recognized by the Company and related to these investments, as of the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
2016		2015		2016		2015
$	96	$	102	$	222	$	221

Note 5. Share-Based Compensation

The Company has adopted an employee stock purchase plan and offers share-based compensation through its equity compensation plans. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted and unrestricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance-based awards and stock appreciation ~~rights and employee stock purchase plans.~~rights. Accounting standards require all share-based payments to employees to be valued using a fair value method on the date of grant and to be expensed based on that fair value over the applicable vesting period.

Historically, the Company has only granted share-based compensation in the form of stock options. There were no options granted in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016.

The Company's 1998 Stock Option Plan, pursuant to which stock options could be granted to key employees and non-employee directors, expired on March 9, 2008. Stock options that were outstanding on March 9, 2008 remained outstanding in accordance with their terms, but no new awards could be granted under the plan after March 9, 2008. Options to purchase ~~69,980~~68,730 shares of common stock were outstanding under the Company's 1998 Stock Option Plan at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant and each option's maximum term is ten years.

Stock option activity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 is summarized below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)			Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding, January 1, 2016		74,960		$	20.05							74,960		$	20.05
Granted		0			0							0			0
Exercised		0			0							0			0
Canceled or expired		(4,980	)		20.05							(6,230	)		20.05
Options outstanding, March 31, 2016		69,980		$	20.05		1.54		$	0
Options exercisable, March 31, 2016		69,980		$	20.05		1.54		$	0
Options outstanding, June 30, 2016												68,730		$	20.05		1.29		$	0
Options exercisable, June 30, 2016												68,730		$	20.05		1.29		$	0

The aggregate intrinsic value of a stock option in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the amount by which the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. This amount changes based on changes in the fair value of the Company's common stock. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the outstanding options had no intrinsic value because the exercise prices of all outstanding options were above the fair value of a share of the Company's common stock.

No options were exercised during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

- 17 -

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, all outstanding stock options were fully vested and there was no unrecognized stock-based compensation expense.

At the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 24, 2016, stockholders approved the Old Point Financial Corporation 2016 Incentive Stock Plan (Incentive Stock Plan). The Incentive Stock Plan provides for the grant to key employees and non-employee directors of awards that may include one or more of the following: stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, and performance units (collectively, the awards). No awards may be granted under the Incentive Stock Plan after May 23, 2026. Complete details of the Incentive Stock Plan are contained in Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. As of June 30, 2016, there were no awards outstanding under the plan.

Also at the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 24, 2016, stockholders approved an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP provides a means for employees of the Company and employees of the Company's subsidiaries to authorize payroll deductions on a voluntary basis to be used for the periodic purchase of shares of the Company's common stock. Under the ESPP, eligible employees will be able to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to at least 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the applicable offering period. The maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the ESPP is 250,000 shares. Complete details of the ESPP are contained in Appendix B of the Proxy Statement for the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The first offering period will begin on September 1, 2016; accordingly, as of June 30, 2016, no shares have been issued under the plan.

Note 6. Pension Plan

The Company provides pension benefits for eligible participants through a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan. The plan was frozen effective September 30, 2006; therefore, no additional participants will be added to the plan. The components of net periodic pension plan cost are as follows for the periods indicated:

Three months ended March 31, 2016 2015
(in thousands)
Interest cost $ 70 $ 66
Expected return on plan assets (98 ) (89 )
Amortization of net loss 140 99
Net periodic pension plan cost $ 112 $ 76

~~- 17 -~~

Three months ended June 30,	2016			2015
	(in thousands)
Interest cost	$	70		$	65
Expected return on plan assets		(98	)		(90	)
Amortization of net loss		140			98
Net periodic pension plan cost	$	112		$	73

Six months ended June 30,	2016			2015
	(in thousands)
Interest cost	$	140		$	131
Expected return on plan assets		(196	)		(179	)
Amortization of net loss		280			197
Net periodic pension plan cost	$	224		$	149

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, management had not yet determined the amount, if any, that the Company will contribute to the plan in the year ending December 31, 2016.

- 18 -

Note 7. Stockholders' Equity and Earnings per Share

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table presents information on amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss, by category, during the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended March 31, Affected Line Item on
2016 2015 Consolidated Statement of Income
Available-for-sale securities
Realized gains on sales of securities $ 509 $ 0 Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities, net
Tax expense 173 0 Income tax expense
$ 336 $ 0 Net of tax

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			Affected Line Item on Consolidated Statements of Income
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
Realized gains (losses) on sales of securities		$	$6		$	$0		$	$515		$	$0	Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities, net
Tax effect			2			0			175			0	Income tax expense
		$	$4		$	$0		$	$340		$	$0

The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss, by category, net of tax, for the periods indicated:

	Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities			Unrealized Losses on Securities Transferred to Held-to-Maturity			Defined Benefit Pension Plans			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Securities			Unrealized Losses on Securities Transferred to Held-to-Maturity				Defined Benefit Pension Plans			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Balance at beginning of period	$	(576	)	$	0		$	(2,586	)	$	(3,162	)	$	(576	)	$	0			$	(2,586	)	$	(3,162	)
Net change for the period		515			0			0			515			2,176			0		��		0			2,176
Balance at end of period	$	(61	)	$	0		$	(2,586	)	$	(2,647	)	$	1,600		$	0			$	(2,586	)	$	(986	)


Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Balance at beginning of period	$	(78	)	$	(3,386	)	$	(2,429	)	$	(5,893	)	$	(78	)	$	(3,386	)		$	(2,429	)	$	(5,893	)
Net change for the period		91			141			0			232			(911	)		311				0			(600	)
Balance at end of period	$	13		$	(3,245	)	$	(2,429	)	$	(5,661	)	$	(989	)	$	(3,075	)		$	(2,429	)	$	(6,493	)

- 19 -

The following table presents the change in each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss on a pre-tax and after-tax basis for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Pretax Tax �� Net-of-Tax
(in thousands)

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period $ 1,289 $ 438 $ 851
Reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in income (509 ) (173 ) (336 )
Net unrealized gains on securities 780 265 515

Total change in accumulated other comprehensive loss $ 780 $ 265 $ 515

~~- 18 -~~

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Pretax				Tax				Net-of-Tax
	(in thousands)

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period		$	3,812			$	1,296			$	2,516
Reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in income			(515	)			(175	)			(340	)
Net unrealized gains on securities			3,297				1,121				2,176

Total change in accumulated other comprehensive loss		$	3,297			$	1,121			$	2,176

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015									Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Pretax			Tax			Net-of-Tax			Pretax				Tax				Net-of-Tax
	(in thousands)									(in thousands)

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period		$	138		$	47		$	91
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities:
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period											$	(1,381	)		$	(470	)		$	(911	)

Unrealized losses on securities transferred from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity:
Amortization			214			73			141			471				160				311

Net change		$	352		$	120		$	232		$	(910	)		$	(310	)		$	(600	)

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of dilutive potential common shares attributable to outstanding stock options. The Company did not include 70an average of 69 thousand and 7877 thousand potential common shares attributable to outstanding stock options in the diluted earnings per share calculation for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively, because they were antidilutive. Antidilutive shares were 69 thousand and 76 thousand for the second quarters of 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern". This update is intended to provide guidance about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Management is required under the new guidance to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued when preparing financial statements for each interim and annual reporting period. If conditions or events are identified, the ASU specifies the process that must be followed by management and also clarifies the timing and content of going concern footnote disclosures in order to reduce diversity in practice. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-15 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities". The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things: 1) Requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. 2) Requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes. 3) Requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables). 4) Eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

- 20 -

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)". Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) A lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~- 19 -~~

During March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships". The amendments in this ASU clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria remain intact. The amendments are effective for public business entities for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, "Investments – Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting". The amendments in this ASU eliminate the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. The amendments require that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting. Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. In addition, the amendments in this ASU require that an entity that has an available-for-sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendments should be applied prospectively upon their effective date to increases in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence that result in the adoption of the equity method. Early Adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-07 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, "Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Shares-Based Payment Accounting". The amendments in this ASU simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

During June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments". The amendments in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendments in this ASU are effective for Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. For public companies that are not SEC filers, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

- 21 -

Note 9. Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" topics of FASB ASU 2010-06 and FASB ASU 2011-04, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company's various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value can be a reasonable point within a range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

In estimating the fair value of assets and liabilities, the Company relies mainly on two models. The first model, used by the Company's bond accounting service provider, determines the fair value of securities. Securities are priced based on an evaluation of observable market data, including benchmark yield curves, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads. Pricing is also impacted by credit information about the issuer, perceived market movements, and current news events impacting the individual sectors. For assets other than securities and for all liabilities, fair value is determined using the Company's asset/liability modeling software. The software uses current yields, anticipated yield changes, and estimated duration of assets and liabilities to calculate fair value.

~~- 20 -~~

In accordance with ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures," the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

Level 1 –

Valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 assets and liabilities generally include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 –

Valuation is based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. The valuation may be based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 –

Valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

An instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A RECURRING BASIS

Debt and equity securities with readily determinable fair values that are classified as "available-for-sale" are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data (Level 2). In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Currently, all of the Company's available-for-sale securities are considered to be Level 2 securities.

- 22 -

The following table presents the balances of certain assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated:

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016 Using
Balance
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
U.S. Treasury securities $ 19,999 $ 0 $ 19,999 $ 0
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies 4,022 0 4,022 0
Obligations of state and political subdivisions 72,992 0 72,992 0
Mortgage-backed securities 93,419 0 93,419 0
Money market investments 511 0 511 0
Corporate bonds 3,411 0 3,411 0
Other marketable equity securities 100 0 100 0
Total available-for-sale securities $ 194,454 $ 0 $ 194,454 $ 0

~~- 21 -~~

				Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using
	Balance			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		$	24,275		$	0		$	24,275		$	0
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			72,734			0			72,734			0
Mortgage-backed securities			64,857			0			64,857			0
Money market investments			621			0			621			0
Corporate bonds			3,624			0			3,624			0
Other marketable equity securities			105			0			105			0
Total available-for-sale securities		$	166,216		$	0		$	166,216		$	0

				Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
	Balance			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Available-for-sale securities
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies		$	24,240		$	0		$	24,240		$	0
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			78,433			0			78,433			0
Mortgage-backed securities			107,396			0			107,396			0
Money market investments			631			0			631			0
Corporate bonds			3,393			0			3,393			0
Other marketable equity securities			99			0			99			0
Total available-for-sale securities		$	214,192		$	0		$	214,192		$	0

ASSETS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE ON A NONRECURRING BASIS

Under certain circumstances, adjustments are made to the fair value for assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis.

Impaired loans

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts when due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. The measurement of fair value and loss associated with impaired loans can be based on the observable market price of the loan, the fair value of the collateral securing the loan, or the discounted present value of the loan's expected future cash flows. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable, with the vast majority of the collateral in real estate.

- 23 -

The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income, market, or cost valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company. In the case of loans with lower balances, the Company may obtain a real estate evaluation instead of an appraisal. Evaluations utilize many of the same techniques as appraisals, and are typically performed by independent appraisers. Once received, appraisals and evaluations are reviewed by trained staff independent of the lending function to verify consistency and reasonability. Appraisals and evaluations are based on significant unobservable inputs, including but not limited to: adjustments made to comparable properties, judgments about the condition of the subject property, the availability and suitability of comparable properties, capitalization rates, projected income of the subject or comparable properties, vacancy rates, projected depreciation rates, and the state of the local and regional economy. The Company may also elect to make additional reductions in the collateral value based on management's best judgment, which represents another source of unobservable inputs. Because of the subjective nature of collateral valuation, impaired loans are considered Level 3.

Impaired loans may be secured by collateral other than real estate. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business' financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). If a loan is not collateral-dependent, its impairment may be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. Because the loan is discounted at its effective rate of interest, rather than at a market rate, the loan is not considered to be held at fair value and is not included in the tables below. Collateral-dependent impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as part of the provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

Loans are transferred to OREO when the collateral securing them is foreclosed on. The measurement of gain or loss associated with OREOs is based on the fair value of the collateral compared to the unpaid loan balance and anticipated costs to sell the property. If there is a contract for the sale of a property, and management reasonably believes the transaction will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the contract, fair value is based on the sale price in that contract (Level 1). If management has recent information about the sale of identical properties, such as when selling multiple condominium units on the same property, the remaining units would be valued based on the observed market data (Level 2). Lacking either a contract or such recent data, management would obtain an appraisal or evaluation of the value of the collateral as discussed above under Impaired Loans (Level 3). After the asset has been booked, a new appraisal or evaluation is obtained when management has reason to believe the fair value of the property may have changed and no later than two years after the last appraisal or evaluation was received. Any fair value adjustments to OREOs below the original book value are recorded in the period incurred and expensed against current earnings.

~~- 22 -~~

The following table presents the assets carried on the consolidated balance sheets for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded. Assets are shown by class of loan and by level in the fair value hierarchy, as of the dates indicated. Certain impaired loans are valued by the present value of the loan's expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate ~~of the loan~~ rather than at a market rate. These loans are not carried on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and, as such, are not included in the table below.

Carrying Value at March 31, 2016 Using
Fair Value
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

(in thousands)
Impaired loans
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family $ 652 $ 0 $ 0 $ 652
Commercial 434 0 0 434
Construction 98 0 0 98
Total $ 1,184 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,184

Other real estate owned
Residential 1-4 family $ 548 $ 0 $ 0 $ 548
Commercial 605 0 0 605
Construction 1,090 0 0 1,090
Total $ 2,243 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,243

			Carrying Value at December 31, 2015 Using								Carrying Value at June 30, 2016 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Impaired loans
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	952	$	0	$	0	$	952	$	353		$	0	$	0	$	353
Commercial		267		0		0		267		278			0		0		278
Construction		62		0		0		62		63			0		0		63
Total mortgage loans on real estate										694			0		0		694
Commercial loans										687			0		0		687
Total	$	1,281	$	0	$	0	$	1,281	$	1,381		$	0	$	0	$	1,381

Other real estate owned
Residential 1-4 family	$	724	$	0	$	0	$	724	$	299		$	0	$	0	$	299
Commercial		927		0		0		927		371			0		0		371
Construction		1,090		0		0		1,090		1,090			0		0		1,090
Total	$	2,741	$	0	$	0	$	2,741	$	1,760		$	0	$	0	$	1,760

- 2324 -

				Carrying Value at December 31, 2015 Using
	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Impaired loans
Mortgage loans on real estate:
Residential 1-4 family	$	952		$	0	$	0	$	952
Commercial		267			0		0		267
Construction		62			0		0		62
Total	$	1,281		$	0	$	0	$	1,281

Other real estate owned
Residential 1-4 family	$	724		$	0	$	0	$	724
Commercial		927			0		0		927
Construction		1,090			0		0		1,090
Total	$	2,741		$	0	$	0	$	2,741

The following table displays quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements as of the dates indicated:

			Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements							Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands)		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)			Fair Value at June 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands)		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans
Residential 1-4 family real estate	$	652	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	353	Market comparables	Selling costs		0.00% - 7.25% (4.92	%)
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 42.20% (16.30	%)
Commercial real estate	$	434	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	278	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00	%
Construction	$	98	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	63	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00	%
Commercial not secured by real estate									687	Market comparables	Liquidation discount		32.71	%

Other real estate owned
Residential 1-4 family	$	548	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	299	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00	%
Commercial	$	605	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	371	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 36.86% (23.26	%)				Liquidation discount		0.00	%
Construction	$	1,090	Market comparables	Selling costs		6.72	%	$	1,090	Market comparables	Selling costs		6.72	%
				Liquidation discount		33.05	%				Liquidation discount		33.05	%

- 25 -

			Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements							Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands)		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)			Fair Value at December 31, 2015 (dollars in thousands)		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Impaired loans
Residential 1-4 family real estate	$	952	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	952	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		0.00% - 4.00% (3.75	%)				Liquidation discount		0.00% - 4.00% (3.75	%)
Commercial real estate	$	267	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	267	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00	%
Construction	$	62	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	62	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00	%				Liquidation discount		4.00	%

Other real estate owned
Residential 1-4 family	$	724	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	724	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 7.17% (4.79	%)				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 7.17% (4.79	%)
Commercial	$	927	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%	$	927	Market comparables	Selling costs		7.25	%
				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 24.70% (11.77	%)				Liquidation discount		4.00% - 24.70% (11.77	%)
Construction	$	1,090	Market comparables	Selling costs		6.72	%	$	1,090	Market comparables	Selling costs		6.72	%
				Liquidation discount		33.05	%				Liquidation discount		33.05	%

ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires disclosure about fair value of financial instruments for interim periods and excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company's assets.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments, including interest-bearing due from banks, approximate fair values.

RESTRICTED SECURITIES

The restricted security category is comprised of FHLB and FRB stock. These stocks are classified as restricted securities because their ownership is restricted to certain types of entities and they lack a market. When the FHLB or FRB repurchases stock, they repurchase at the stock's book value. Therefore, the carrying amounts of restricted securities approximate fair value.

~~- 24 -~~

LOANS RECEIVABLE

The fair value of a loan is based on its interest rate in relation to its risk profile, in comparison to what an investor could earn on a different investment with a similar risk profile. Variations in risk tolerance between lenders, and thus in risk pricing, can result in the same loan being priced differently at different institutions. A bank's experience with the type of lending (such as commercial real estate) can also impact its assessment of the riskiness of a loan. A comprehensive picture of competitors' rates in relation to borrower risk profiles is not available. Instead, the Company uses a model which estimates market value based on the loan's interest rate (regardless of its risk level) and rates for debt of similar maturities where market data is available. Since the rate and risk profile are the primary factors in determining the fair value of a loan, both of which are unobservable in the market, the Company classifies loans as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated as described above.

- 26 -

BANK-OWNED LIFE INSURANCE

Bank-owned life insurance represents insurance policies on certain current and former officers of the Company. The cash value of the policies is estimated using information provided by the insurance carrier. The insurance carrier uses actuarial data to estimate the value of each policy, based on the age and health of the insured relative to other individuals about whom the carrier has information. Health information can be broken down into quantitative, observable inputs, such as smoking habits, blood pressure, and weight, which, along with the insured's age, can be compared to observable data the insurance carrier has available. The carrier can then estimate the cash value of each policy. Since the cash value represents the amount of cash the Company would receive when the policies are paid, the cash value closely approximates the fair value of the policies. Accordingly, bank-owned life insurance is classified as Level 2.

DEPOSIT LIABILITIES

The fair value of demand deposits, savings and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Information about the rates paid by other institutions for deposits of similar terms is readily available, and rates are mainly influenced by the term of the deposit itself. As a result, fair value calculations are based on observable inputs, and are classified as Level 2.

SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. Since the contractual terms of these borrowings provide all information necessary to calculate the amounts that will be due at maturity, these liabilities are classified as Level 2.

LONG-TERM BORROWINGS

The fair values of the Company's long-term borrowings are estimated based on the current cost to repay the debt in full, discounted to current values and including any prepayment penalties that may apply. As the contractual terms of the borrowing provide all the necessary inputs for this calculation, long-term borrowings are classified as Level 2.

ACCRUED INTEREST

The calculation of accrued interest is based on readily observable information, such as the rate and term of the underlying asset or liability. Since these amounts are expected to be realized quickly (generally within 30 to 90 days), the carrying value approximates fair value and is classified as Level 2.

COMMITMENTS TO EXTEND CREDIT AND IRREVOCABLE LETTERS OF CREDIT

The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit-worthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the fair value of fees charged for loan commitments and irrevocable letters of credit was immaterial.

- 2527 -

The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, of the Company's financial instruments as of the dates indicated are as follows:

			Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016 Using								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	13,260	$	13,260	$	0	$	0	$	32,216	$	32,216	$	0	$	0
Securities available-for-sale		194,454		0		194,454		0		166,216		0		166,216		0
Restricted securities		970		0		970		0		2,882		0		2,882		0
Loans, net of allowances for loan losses		565,673		0		0		566,618		590,227		0		0		594,046
Bank-owned life insurance		24,626		0		24,626		0		24,843		0		24,843		0
Accrued interest receivable		2,937		0		2,937		0		3,090		0		3,090		0

Liabilities
Deposits	$	724,679	$	0	$	725,141	$	0	$	727,001	$	0	$	727,603	$	0
Overnight repurchase agreements		31,778		0		31,778		0		23,865		0		23,865		0
Federal Home Loan Bank advances										45,000		0		45,003		0
Accrued interest payable		220		0		220		0		220		0		220		0

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015 Using
	Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	36,990	$	36,990	$	0	$	0	$	36,990	$	36,990	$	0	$	0
Securities available-for-sale		214,192		0		214,192		0		214,192		0		214,192		0
Restricted securities		2,016		0		2,016		0		2,016		0		2,016		0
Loans, net of allowances for loan losses		560,737		0		0		559,488		560,737		0		0		559,488
Bank-owned life insurance		24,411		0		24,411		0		24,411		0		24,411		0
Accrued interest receivable		3,059		0		3,059		0		3,059		0		3,059		0

Liabilities
Deposits	$	746,471	$	0	$	746,740	$	0	$	746,471	$	0	$	746,740	$	0
Overnight repurchase agreements		25,950		0		25,950		0		25,950		0		25,950		0
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		25,000		0		25,501		0		25,000		0		25,501		0
Accrued interest payable		241		0		241		0		241		0		241		0

Note 10. Segment Reporting

The Company operates in a decentralized fashion in three principal business segments: The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank), Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N. A. (Trust), and the Company as a separate segment (for purposes of this Note, the Parent). Revenues from the Bank's operations consist primarily of interest earned on loans and investment securities and service charges on deposit accounts. Trust's operating revenues consist principally of income from fiduciary activities. The Parent's revenues are mainly fees and dividends received from the Bank and Trust companies. The Company has no other segments.

- 28 -

The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately because each segment appeals to different markets and, accordingly, requires different technologies and marketing strategies.

~~- 26 -~~

Information about reportable segments, and reconciliation of such information to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016												Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Bank		Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated		Bank			Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	7,351	$	14	$	1,146		$	(1,146	)	$	7,365	$	7,420		$	15	$	725		$	(725	)	$	7,435
Income from fiduciary activities		0		901		0			0			901		0			877		0			0			877
Other income		2,503		276		50			(65	)		2,764		2,174			250		50			(65	)		2,409
Total operating income		9,854		1,191		1,196			(1,211	)		11,030		9,594			1,142		775			(790	)		10,721

Expenses
Interest expense		719		0		0			0			719		582			0		0			0			582
Provision for loan losses		150		0		0			0			150		1,250			0		0			0			1,250
Salaries and employee benefits		4,362		678		114			0			5,154		4,124			679		87			0			4,890
Other expenses		3,615		261		126			(65	)		3,937		3,183			251		226			(65	)		3,595
Total operating expenses		8,846		939		240			(65	)		9,960		9,139			930		313			(65	)		10,317

Income before taxes		1,008		252		956			(1,146	)		1,070		455			212		462			(725	)		404

Income tax expense (benefit)		28		86		(65	)		0			49		(131	)		72		(89	)		0			(148	)

Net income	$	980	$	166	$	1,021		$	(1,146	)	$	1,021	$	586		$	140	$	551		$	(725	)	$	552

Capital expenditures	$	367	$	4	$	0		$	0		$	371	$	105		$	0	$	0		$	0		$	105

Total assets	$	851,716	$	5,865	$	94,236		$	(94,970	)	$	856,847	$	891,786		$	5,814	$	95,933		$	(95,860	)	$	897,673

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015												Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Bank		Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated		Bank		Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in thousands)												(in thousands)
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	7,491	$	13	$	1,268		$	(1,268	)	$	7,504	$	7,537	$	13	$	1,375		$	(1,375	)	$	7,550
Income from fiduciary activities		0		980		0			0			980		0		914		0			0			914
Other income		2,051		261		50			(65	)		2,297		2,211		250		50			(66	)		2,445
Total operating income		9,542		1,254		1,318			(1,333	)		10,781		9,748		1,177		1,425			(1,441	)		10,909

Expenses
Interest expense		893		0		0			0			893		918		0		0			0			918
Provision for loan losses		275		0		0			0			275		25		0		0			0			25
Salaries and employee benefits		4,309		627		113			0			5,049		4,275		671		111			0			5,057
Other expenses		3,035		236		32			(65	)		3,238		3,163		256		84			(66	)		3,437
Total operating expenses		8,512		863		145			(65	)		9,455		8,381		927		195			(66	)		9,437

Income before taxes		1,030		391		1,173			(1,268	)		1,326		1,367		250		1,230			(1,375	)		1,472

Income tax expense (benefit)		20		133		(32	)		0			121		157		85		(49	)		0			193

Net income	$	1,010	$	258	$	1,205		$	(1,268	)	$	1,205	$	1,210	$	165	$	1,279		$	(1,375	)	$	1,279

Capital expenditures	$	955	$	18	$	0		$	0		$	973	$	73	$	2	$	0		$	0		$	75

Total assets	$	882,771	$	5,848	$	89,543		$	(90,484	)	$	887,678	$	888,344	$	5,815	$	89,599		$	(90,256	)	$	893,502

- 29 -

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Bank			Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in thousands)
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	14,771		$	29	$	1,871		$	(1,871	)	$	14,800
Income from fiduciary activities		0			1,778		0			0			1,778
Other income		4,677			526		100			(130	)		5,173
Total operating income		19,448			2,333		1,971			(2,001	)		21,751

Expenses
Interest expense		1,301			0		0			0			1,301
Provision for loan losses		1,400			0		0			0			1,400
Salaries and employee benefits		8,486			1,357		201			0			10,044
Other expenses		6,798			512		352			(130	)		7,532
Total operating expenses		17,985			1,869		553			(130	)		20,277

Income before taxes		1,463			464		1,418			(1,871	)		1,474

Income tax expense (benefit)		(103	)		158		(154	)		0			(99	)

Net income	$	1,566		$	306	$	1,572		$	(1,871	)	$	1,573

Capital expenditures	$	472		$	4	$	0		$	0		$	476

Total assets	$	891,786		$	5,814	$	95,933		$	(95,860	)	$	897,673

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
	Bank		Trust		Parent			Eliminations			Consolidated
	(in thousands)
Revenues
Interest and dividend income	$	15,028	$	26	$	2,643		$	(2,643	)	$	15,054
Income from fiduciary activities		0		1,894		0			0			1,894
Other income		4,262		511		100			(131	)		4,742
Total operating income		19,290		2,431		2,743			(2,774	)		21,690

Expenses
Interest expense		1,811		0		0			0			1,811
Provision for loan losses		300		0		0			0			300
Salaries and employee benefits		8,583		1,298		225			0			10,106
Other expenses		6,198		492		116			(131	)		6,675
Total operating expenses		16,892		1,790		341			(131	)		18,892

Income before taxes		2,398		641		2,402			(2,643	)		2,798

Income tax expense (benefit)		178		218		(82	)		0			314

Net income	$	2,220	$	423	$	2,484		$	(2,643	)	$	2,484

Capital expenditures	$	1,028	$	20	$	0		$	0		$	1,048

Total assets	$	888,344	$	5,815	$	89,599		$	(90,256	)	$	893,502

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies reported in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, not including nonrecurring gains or losses.

Both the Parent and the Trust companies maintain deposit accounts with the Bank, on terms substantially similar to those available to other customers. These transactions are eliminated to reach consolidated totals.

- 30 -

Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies

There have been no material changes in the Company's commitments and contingencies from those disclosed in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

~~- 27 -~~

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Available Information

The Company maintains a website on the Internet at www.oldpoint.com. The Company makes available free of charge, on or through its website, its proxy statements, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information available on the Company's Internet website is not part of this Form 10-Q or any other report filed by the Company with the SEC. The public may read and copy any documents the Company files with or furnishes to the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company's SEC filings can also be obtained on the SEC's website on the Internet at www.sec.gov.

The following discussion is intended to assist readers in understanding and evaluating the financial condition, changes in financial condition and the results of operations of the Company. The Company consists of the parent company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank) and Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N. A. (Trust), collectively referred to as the Company. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained elsewhere in this report.

Caution About Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this report may contain forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statement that is not a statement of historical fact may be deemed to be a forward-looking statement. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements regarding profitability ~~including the focus on reducing time deposits;~~and future financial performance; the net interest margin; strategies for managing the net interest margin and the expected impact of such efforts; levels and sources of liquidity; the loan portfolio and expected trends in the quality of the loan portfolio; the allowance and provision for loan losses; the effect of a sustained increase in nonperforming assets; the securities portfolio; use of proceeds from the sale of securities; the effect of increases in past due loans in the Company's purchased student loan portfolio; interest rate sensitivity; asset quality; levels of net loan charge-offs or recoveries and nonperforming assets; levels of interest expense; levels and components of noninterest income and noninterest ~~expense; lease~~ expense; income taxes; low-income housing tax credits and additional capital calls related to the Company's investment in housing equity funds; expected impact of efforts to restructure the balance sheet; expected yields on the loan and securities portfolios; expected monetary policy actions by the Federal Open Market Committee; expected rates on interest-bearing liabilities; expected interest savings resulting from the prepayment of the Company's FHLB advance; market risk; business and growth strategies; investment strategy; and financial and other goals. Forward-looking statements often use words such as "believes," "expects," "plans," "may," "will," "should," "projects," "contemplates," "anticipates," "forecasts," "intends" or other words of similar meaning. These statements can also be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from historical results or those anticipated by such statements.

There are many factors that could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Company including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates and yields; general economic and general business conditions, including unemployment levels; uncertainty over future federal spending or the effects of federal budget cuts, particularly to the Department of Defense, on the Company's service area; changes associated with the new leadership of the Bank; effects of the transfer of the securities portfolio from held-to-maturity securities to available-for-sale securities; the quality or composition of the loan or securities portfolios; changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities; the effects of management's investment strategy and strategy to manage the net interest margin; the adequacy of the Company's credit quality review processes; the level of nonperforming assets and related charge-offs and recoveries; turnover times experienced by the mortgage companies to which the Company has extended warehouse lines of credit; the federal government's guarantee of repayment of student loans purchased by the Company; the ability of the Company to diversify its sources of noninterest income; the effect of the Company's sales training efforts for branch staff; the local real estate market; volatility and disruption in national and international financial markets; government intervention in the U.S. financial system; application of the Basel III capital standards to the Company and its subsidiaries; FDIC premiums and/or assessments; demand for loan and other banking products and financial services in the Company's primary service area; levels of noninterest income and expense; deposit flows; competition; the use of inaccurate assumptions in management's modeling systems; technology; any interruption or breach of security in the Company's information systems or those of the Company's third party vendors or other service providers; reliance on third parties for key services; adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and changes in accounting principles, policies and guidelines. The Company could also be adversely affected by monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, as well as any regulations or programs implemented pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act or other legislation and policies of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board.

- 31 -

These risks and uncertainties, in addition to the risks and uncertainties identified in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K, should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements contained herein, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made. In addition, past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of future results.

~~- 28 -~~

General

The Company is the parent company of the Bank and Trust. The Bank is a locally managed community bank serving the Hampton Roads localities of Chesapeake, Hampton, Isle of Wight County, Newport News, Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Williamsburg/James City County and York County. The Bank currently has 18 branch offices. Trust is a wealth management services provider.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, there have been no significant changes with regard to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K. The accounting policy that required management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments is the Company's allowance for loan losses. The Company's policies for calculating the allowance for loan losses are discussed in this Item 2 and in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and are discussed in further detail in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

Earnings Summary

Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company re-evaluated its strategy to ensure it was positioned for possible future interest rate changes. This strategy was implemented in the first quarter of 2016 and included restructuring the investment portfolio through the sale and purchase of certain investments. While implementing its strategy, the Company took advantage of the opportunity to recognize gains which would offset losses on other real estate owned incurred in the sale of the properties, as well as a fee paid to unwind one of the Company's FHLB advances (discussed in greater detail below).

Net income for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 was ~~$1.0~~$1.6 million, or ~~$0.21~~$0.32 per diluted share, compared to net income of ~~$1.2~~$2.5 million, or ~~$0.24~~$0.50 per diluted share, for the first ~~three~~six months of 2015. This ~~15.27%~~36.67% decrease is primarily attributable to reduced interest income, primarily on the securities portfolio; a higher provision for loan losses due to a charge-off on a single borrowing relationship; and higher noninterest expense, in particular legal and audit expenses and the prepayment fee on the Company's FHLB advance. These factors were partially offset by net gains on the sales of investment securities.

In the second quarter of 2016, net income decreased $727 thousand, or 56.84% when compared to the second quarter of 2015. As in the six month period ended June 30, 2016, the decrease in quarterly net income was mainly due to an increased provision for loan losses, slightly offset by higher net interest income. In the second quarter of 2016, noninterest income and ~~higher net interest income after~~noninterest expense were both lower than in the ~~provision for loan losses.~~comparable period in 2015.

Net Interest Income

The principal source of earnings for the Company is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest and fees generated by earning assets and interest expense paid to fund them. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, have a significant impact on the level of net interest income. The net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax-equivalent net interest income by average earning assets.

The Company experienced moderate loan growth, with average total loans increasing ~~$28.6~~$20.8 million when comparing the first ~~quarters~~half of 2016 and 2015. While loan yields declined when comparing the same periods, the increase in average balances increased interest income on loans by ~~$57 thousand.~~$131 thousand when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2016 to the same period in 2015. This growth in loans was funded through sales from the securities portfolio and excess liquidity held in cash and due from banks and interest-bearing due from banks. As seen in the table below, loans bear higher yields than securities and significantly higher yields than funds due from banks. Shifting funds from investments to loans increased the Company's return on average earning assets to 4.02% for the first six months of 2016, compared to 4.01% for the first six months of 2015, despite overall declines in market rates.

~~Sales~~Excess liquidity and the sales of securities ~~and excess liquidity in cash and due from banks~~ also funded the early payoff of one of the Company's advance from the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). As the~~FHLB, an advance which would have matured in June of 2016. The rate on this advance was significantly higher than other available funding sources in the current rate environment and would have cost the ~~prepayment more than offset~~Company $597 thousand in interest expense during 2016. By paying off the advance in February of 2016, the Company paid only $141 thousand, thus saving $456 thousand in interest expense for 2016. As a ~~4 basis point decline in the yield on average earning assets. This prepayment and its related $164 thousand~~result of this reduction in interest expense, ~~during~~the Company's weighted-average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities decreased from 0.60% in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2015 to 0.47% in the first half of 2016 ~~was a primary factor in improving the Company's~~and its net interest margin ~~which increased~~improved from 3.55% to ~~3.62% for~~3.67% over the ~~first quarter~~same periods.

- 32 -

Although the Company took out additional borrowings in June of 2016, ~~from 3.58%~~these borrowings would have been necessary even had the Company not prepaid the $25.0 million advance in February, as the additional funding was needed at the end of the quarter, after the maturity date of the advance. In addition, the advances taken out in June of 2016 cost the Company only $3 thousand for that month, less than the ~~first quarter of 2015.~~amount saved by prepaying the advance.

Net interest income, on a fully tax-equivalent basis, was ~~$6.9~~$14.0 million infor the ~~first quarter of~~six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an increase of ~~$14~~$213 thousand ~~from the first quarter of 2015,~~or 1.55%. Tax-equivalent interest income decreased $297 thousand between these two periods due to a decrease in ~~tax-equivalent interest income of $160 thousand and~~average earning assets, partially offset by a ~~decrease in interest expense of $174 thousand. Tax-equivalent interest income~~slight increase in the average yield. Interest income on the securities portfolio decreased $401 thousand, or 15.60%, for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 ~~decreased 2.06% as~~ compared to the first ~~three months of 2015, as discussed further below. Interest expense in the first three months of 2016 decreased 19.48% as compared to the first three~~six months of 2015, primarily as a result of the ~~early payoff on~~sale of investment securities during the ~~FHLB advance.~~

~~During the three~~first six months ~~ended March 31, 2016, the yield on~~of 2016. Interest expense decreased $510 thousand, or 28.16%, when comparing those six month periods as average ~~earning assets decreased by 4 basis points~~interest-bearing liabilities and the ~~average balance of earning assets decreased by 1.01% from~~rate paid on these accounts both declined, due to the comparable period in 2015. As loans continue to grow, the Company reinvests cash flows from the securities portfolio into loans, which typically provide higher yields. A portion of the cash flows received from the securities portfolio were also used to fund the early payoff of the FHLB advance discussed ~~above~~above.

For the second quarter of 2016, tax-equivalent net interest income was $7.1 million, an increase of $199 thousand, or 2.89%, from the second quarter of 2015, due to a decrease in interest expense of $336 thousand. Both the average balances on interest-bearing liabilities and ~~thus were not available for reinvestment. Management considered~~ the ~~opportunity cost inherent in reducing its liquidity~~average rate paid on these liabilities decreased when ~~calculating~~comparing the ~~benefit~~second quarters of 2016 and 2015. The rates on average interest-bearing liabilities decreased primarily due to the payoff of the ~~early payoff~~FHLB advance. As in the six months ended June 30, 2016, average earning assets decreased when comparing the second quarter of 2016 to the same period in 2015. The yield on earning assets increased between the three months ended June 30, 2016 and ~~determined that~~2015 despite decreases in yields on both loans and investment securities, as the interest expense saved over the remaining term of the advance ($460 thousand) more than offset the early payoff fee ($391 thousand). In addition, the Company had sufficient liquidity to pay the advance and associated fee without borrowing fromyield on other ~~sources, and the potential interest earned on $25.0 million in excess liquidity was less than the amount saved by the early payoff.~~investments increased.

Management expects that the Company's loan yields will continue to decline, due to intense competition for quality loans and rate reductions on loans currently held in the portfolio. Management expects that the reduction in loan yields will likely continue in 2016 at approximately the same pace seen in 2015, depending on monetary policy actions taken by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). Although the FOMC did raise the target range for the federal funds rate in December of 2015, predictions for future rate increases are varied. Barring additional rate increases by the FOMC in 2016, management expects continued declines in loan yields. To partially offset this anticipated decline, management has placed an increased focus on managing the mix of the liabilities in order to increase low cost funds and reduce high cost funds when possible. If the FOMC does increase the target rate in 2016, management expects that the decline in loan yields will slow or stop. Based on management's evaluation of current predictions of the FOMC's likely actions with regards to the target range, management does not expect loan yields to increase in 2016.

- 2933 -

The following table shows an analysis of average earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and rates and yields for the periods indicated. Nonaccrual loans are included in loans outstanding.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, NET INTEREST INCOME* AND RATES*	AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, NET INTEREST INCOME* AND RATES*																	AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, NET INTEREST INCOME* AND RATES*
		For the quarter ended March 31,																	For the quarter ended June 30,
		2016								2015									2016								2015
					Interest								Interest									Interest								Interest
		Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/				Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/
		Balance			Expense		Rate**			Balance			Expense		Rate**				Balance			Expense		Rate**			Balance			Expense		Rate**
		(dollars in thousands)																	(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans*		$	570,344		$	6,446		4.52	%	$	541,782		$	6,389		4.72	%		$	581,281		$	6,593		4.54	%	$	568,137		$	6,519		4.59	%
Investment securities:
Taxable			116,308			548		1.88	%		137,200			686		2.00	%			109,300			471		1.72	%		132,853			615		1.85	%
Tax-exempt*			67,023			582		3.47	%		72,804			641		3.52	%			65,432			568		3.47	%		71,824			628		3.50	%
Total investment securities			183,331			1,130		2.47	%		210,004			1,327		2.53	%			174,732			1,039		2.38	%		204,677			1,243		2.43	%
Interest-bearing due from banks			2,705			4		0.59	%		10,637			7		0.26	%			1,097			1		0.36	%		6,089			3		0.20	%
Federal funds sold			1,637			1		0.24	%		2,194			0		0.00	%			1,415			1		0.28	%		1,745			1		0.23	%
Other investments			1,446			15		4.15	%		2,602			33		5.07	%			1,086			26		9.58	%		2,598			31		4.77	%
Total earning assets			759,463		$	7,596		4.00	%		767,219		$	7,756		4.04	%			759,611		$	7,660		4.03	%		783,246		$	7,797		3.98	%
Allowance for loan losses			(7,836	)							(7,200	)								(7,794	)							(7,511	)
Other nonearning assets			111,888								116,329
Other non-earning assets																				107,155								114,296
Total assets		$	863,515							$	876,348								$	858,972							$	890,031

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts		$	11,015		$	1		0.04	%	$	11,280		$	1		0.04	%		$	14,150		$	1		0.03	%	$	11,257		$	1		0.04	%
Money market deposit accounts			222,633			44		0.08	%		222,475			42		0.08	%			223,561			43		0.08	%		231,377			47		0.08	%
Savings accounts			77,188			10		0.05	%		72,611			9		0.05	%			77,903			10		0.05	%		74,711			9		0.05	%
Time deposits, $100,000 or more			116,668			275		0.94	%		109,199			270		0.99	%			109,224			281		1.03	%		115,829			293		1.01	%
Other time deposits			92,303			242		1.05	%		115,625			258		0.89	%			98,684			236		0.96	%		108,383			251		0.93	%
Total time and savings deposits			519,807			572		0.44	%		531,190			580		0.44	%			523,522			571		0.44	%		541,557			601		0.44	%
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings			25,363			6		0.09	%		34,591			8		0.09	%			26,582			8		0.12	%		33,931			8		0.09	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			11,538			141		4.89	%		30,000			305		4.07	%			2,747			3		0.44	%		29,725			309		4.16	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities			556,708			719		0.52	%		595,781			893		0.60	%			552,851			582		0.42	%		605,213			918		0.61	%
Demand deposits			205,710								187,298									204,623								190,515
Other liabilities			6,627								3,815									6,603								4,251
Stockholders' equity			94,470								89,454									94,895								90,052
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$	863,515							$	876,348								$	858,972							$	890,031
Net interest margin					$	6,877		3.62	%				$	6,863		3.58	%					$	7,078		3.73	%				$	6,879		3.51	%

*Computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 34% rate	*Computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 34% rate																	*Computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 34% rate
**Annualized	**Annualized																	**Annualized

- 3034 -

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, NET INTEREST INCOME* AND RATES*
	For the six months ended June 30,
	2016								2015
				Interest								Interest
	Average			Income/		Yield/			Average			Income/		Yield/
	Balance			Expense		Rate**			Balance			Expense		Rate**
	(dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Loans*	$	575,812		$	13,038		4.53	%	$	555,032		$	12,907		4.65	%
Investment securities:
Taxable		112,804			1,019		1.81	%		135,014			1,301		1.93	%
Tax-exempt*		66,228			1,151		3.48	%		72,311			1,270		3.51	%
Total investment securities		179,032			2,170		2.42	%		207,325			2,571		2.48	%
Interest-bearing due from banks		1,901			5		0.53	%		8,351			10		0.24	%
Federal funds sold		1,526			2		0.26	%		1,968			1		0.10	%
Other investments		1,266			41		6.48	%		2,600			64		4.92	%
Total earning assets		759,537		$	15,256		4.02	%		775,276		$	15,553		4.01	%
Allowance for loan losses		(7,815	)							(7,356	)
Other non-earning assets		109,521								115,307
Total assets	$	861,243							$	883,227

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Time and savings deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts	$	12,583		$	2		0.03	%	$	11,268		$	2		0.04	%
Money market deposit accounts		223,097			88		0.08	%		226,951			89		0.08	%
Savings accounts		77,545			19		0.05	%		73,667			18		0.05	%
Time deposits, $100,000 or more		109,136			566		1.04	%		112,514			563		1.00	%
Other time deposits		99,303			468		0.94	%		112,002			509		0.91	%
Total time and savings deposits		521,664			1,143		0.44	%		536,402			1,181		0.44	%
Federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings		25,972			14		0.11	%		34,259			16		0.09	%
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		7,143			144		4.03	%		29,862			614		4.11	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		554,779			1,301		0.47	%		600,523			1,811		0.60	%
Demand deposits		205,167								188,916
Other liabilities		6,615								4,033
Stockholders' equity		94,682								89,755
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	861,243							$	883,227
Net interest margin				$	13,955		3.67	%				$	13,742		3.55	%

*Computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 34% rate
**Annualized

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is a charge against earnings necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level consistent with management's evaluation of the portfolio. This expense is based on management's estimate of credit losses that are probable of being sustained in the loan portfolio. Management's evaluation included credit quality trends, collateral values, the findings of internal credit quality assessments and results from external bank regulatory examinations. These factors, as well as identified impaired loans, historical losses and current economic and business conditions, were used in developing estimated loss factors for determining the loan loss provision.

The provision for loan losses was ~~$150 thousand~~$1.4 million in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016, compared to ~~$275~~$300 thousand in the first six months of 2015, and $1.3 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to $25 thousand in the second quarter of 2015. ~~Management concluded that~~Approximately $400 thousand of the increase in the provision for loan losses in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 was ~~appropriate based~~due to growth in loans, which required the Company to set aside additional funds. The remainder of the second quarter increase was due to a charge-off on a single borrowing relationship whose condition deteriorated rapidly. None of the loans in this relationship had been more than sixty days past due until the second quarter of 2016, when the Company became aware of the potential impairment on these loans and, after assessing the loans' collateral, charged off uncollectible balances totaling $836 thousand. Based on its analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan ~~losses. The more moderate growth~~losses, management concluded that the provision was appropriate.

- 35 -

As a result of the charge-off in the ~~loan portfolio during the first~~second quarter of 2016, ~~as compared to the first quarter of 2015 allowed management to reduce the provision.~~

~~Net~~net loans charged off as a percent of total loans on an annualized basis were ~~0.06%~~0.40% for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016, or ~~$86 thousand,~~$1.2 million, compared to a negative ~~0.04%~~0.01%, or a net recovery of ~~$61~~$22 thousand, in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015 as loan recoveries exceeded charge-offs in that ~~quarter.~~period. Management believes that the level of charge-offs seen in the first half of 2016 does not represent a long-term trend, and that net charge-offs for the remainder of 2016 will be closer to long-term historical averages, ~~unless~~barring declines in national and local economic ~~conditions do not continue to improve.~~conditions. At the same time, management does not expect that net charge-offs in future periods will be as high as those experienced during the recession of 2008 and 2009 and its aftermath. In addition to the possible effects of a wide-spread recession, possible future reductions in military and defense spending could cause higher local unemployment and financial stress on borrowers, which would likely cause an increase in nonperforming assets as individuals struggle to make loan payments or as a result of declines in real estate values and home sales. Increased nonperforming assets could cause increased charge-offs and lower earnings due to larger contributions to the loan loss provision and reductions in interest-accruing loans.

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest, restructured loans that are accruing interest and not performing according to their modified terms, and OREO. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for an explanation of ~~these~~the loan categories. OREO consists of real estate from foreclosures on loan ~~collateral.~~collateral and one former Bank building. The majority of the loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest are student loans with principal and interest amounts that are 97 - 98% guaranteed by the federal government. When a loan changes from "past due 90 days or more and accruing interest" status to "nonaccrual" status, the loan is reviewed for impairment. In most cases, if the loan is considered impaired, then the difference between the value of the collateral and the principal amount outstanding on the loan is charged off. If the Company is waiting on an appraisal to determine the collateral's value or is in negotiations with the borrower or other parties that may affect the value of the collateral, management allocates funds to cover the deficiency to the allowance for loan losses based on information available to management at that time. In the case of TDRs, the restructuring may be to modify to an unsecured loan (e.g., a short sale) that the borrower can afford to repay. In these circumstances, the entire balance of the loan would be specifically allocated for, unless the present value of expected future cash flows was more than the current balance on the loan. It would not be charged off if the loan documentation supports the borrower's ability to repay the modified loan.

- 3136 -

The following table presents information on nonperforming assets, as of the dates indicated:

NONPERFORMING ASSETS	NONPERFORMING ASSETS								NONPERFORMING ASSETS
		March 31,		December 31,		Increase				June 30,		December 31,		Increase
		2016		2015		(Decrease)				2016		2015		(Decrease)
		(in thousands)								(in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial		$	257	$	276	$	(19	)		$	197	$	276	$	(79	)
Real estate-mortgage (1)			6,200		4,306		1,894				3,713		4,306		(593	)
Total nonaccrual loans		$	6,457	$	4,582	$	1,875			$	3,910	$	4,582	$	(672	)

Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest
Commercial		$	0	$	164	$	(164	)		$	0	$	164	$	(164	)
Real estate-construction			162		0		162				0		0		-
Real estate-mortgage (1)			20		23		(3	)			648		23		625
Consumer loans (2)			2,903		3,163		(260	)			2,570		3,163		(593	)
Other			7		6		1				4		6		(2	)
Total loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest		$	3,092	$	3,356	$	(264	)		$	3,222	$	3,356	$	(134	)

Restructured loans
Commercial		$	115	$	0	$	115			$	109	$	0	$	109
Real estate-construction			98		99		(1	)			97		99		(2	)
Real estate-mortgage (1)		$	11,010	$	11,077	$	(67	)			10,917		11,077		(160	)
Consumer loans			11		12		(1	)			0		12		(12	)
Total restructured loans		$	11,234	$	11,188	$	46			$	11,123	$	11,188	$	(65	)
Less nonaccrual restructured loans (included above)			3,628		2,497		1,131				2,526		2,497		29
Less restructured loans currently in compliance (3)			7,606		8,691		(1,085	)			8,597		8,691		(94	)
Net nonperforming, accruing restructured loans		$	0	$	0	$	0			$	0	$	0	$	0

Nonperforming loans										$	7,132	$	7,938	$	(806	)

Other real estate owned
Construction, land development, and other land		$	1,090	$	1,090	$	0			$	1,090	$	1,090	$	0
1-4 family residential properties			548		724		(176	)			299		724		(425	)
Nonfarm nonresidential properties			605		927		(322	)			371		927		(556	)
Former bank building											127		0		127
Total other real estate owned		$	2,243	$	2,741	$	(498	)		$	1,887	$	2,741	$	(854	)

Total nonperforming assets		$	11,792	$	10,679	$	1,113			$	9,019	$	10,679	$	(1,660	)

(1) The real estate-mortgage segment includes residential 1 – 4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit.
(2) Amounts listed include student loans with principal and interest amounts that are 97 - 98% guaranteed by the federal government. The portion of these guaranteed loans that is past due 90 days or more totaled $2.9 million at March 31, 2016 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2015.
(3) As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all of the Company's restructured accruing loans were performing in compliance with their modified terms.

(1) The real estate-mortgage segment includes residential 1 – 4 family, commercial real estate, second mortgages and equity lines of credit.

(2) Amounts listed include student loans with principal and interest amounts that are 97 - 98% guaranteed by the federal government. The portion of these guaranteed loans that is past due 90 days or more totaled $2.6 million at June 30, 2016 and $3.1 million at December 31, 2015.

(3) As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all of the Company's restructured accruing loans were performing in compliance with their modified terms.

Nonperforming assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 were ~~$11.8~~$9.0 million, ~~$1.1~~$1.7 million ~~higher~~lower than nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2015. Nonaccrual loans ~~increased $1.9 million~~decreased $672 thousand when comparing the balances as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 to December 31, 2015. Two loans on nonaccrual at December 31, 2015 were returned to accruing status in the first half of 2016, based on the borrowers' continued performance. The remainder of the decrease was due to the ~~addition~~payoff and/or charge-off of ~~a single large commercial real estate loan in the amount of $2.3 million during the first quarter of 2016. Although the aggregate balance of the~~three other loans in nonaccrual status decreased between December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016, the addition of this single large loan was sufficient to increase total nonaccrual loans by $1.9 million between December 31, 2015 and March 31, 2016.loans. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest decreased ~~$264~~$134 thousand. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~nearly all~~$2.6 million of the ~~$3.1~~$3.2 million of loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest were student loans on which the Company expects to experience minimal losses. Because the federal government has provided guarantees of repayment of these student loans in an amount ranging from 97% to 98% of the total principal ~~balance~~and interest of the loans, management does not expect significant increases in past due student loans to have a material effect on the Company.

- 37 -

The majority of the balance of nonaccrual loans at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 was related to a few large credit relationships. Of the ~~$6.5~~$3.9 million of nonaccrual loans at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~$5.5~~$3.0 million or approximately ~~84.87%~~76.73% was comprised of ~~three~~two credit relationships of $2.4 million ~~$2.3 million~~ and ~~$780~~$575 thousand. Total restructured loans ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$46~~$65 thousand from December 31, 2015 to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 due to paydowns and charge-offs on other restructured loans, partially offset by the restructuring of one additional loan ~~partially offset by paydowns and charge-offs on other restructured loans.~~in the first quarter of 2016. All accruing TDRs are performing in accordance with their modified terms. OREO decreased by ~~$498~~$854 thousand during the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 due to the sale of ~~two properties.~~four properties, offset by the addition of a former Bank building to OREO, as the property is no longer in use by the Company and is listed for sale.

~~- 32 -~~

The loans that make up the nonaccrual balance have been written down to their net realizable value. If the Company is waiting on an appraisal to determine the collateral's value, management allocates funds to cover the deficiency to the allowance for loan losses based on information available to management at the time. As shown in the table above, the majority of nonaccrual loans at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were collateralized by real estate.

Management believes the Company has excellent credit quality review processes in place to identify problem loans quickly. The quality of the Company's loan portfolio has continued to improve over the past few years, with nonperforming assets generally stabilizing as troubled borrowers' finances have improved and troubled loans have been charged off or sold. Management remains cautious about the future and is well aware that if the economy does not continue to improve, or if reduced federal spending continues to negatively impact federal military and defense spending in the Company's service area, nonperforming assets could increase in future periods. As was seen in prior years, the effect of a sustained increase in nonperforming assets would be lower earnings caused by larger contributions to the loan loss provision, and lower levels of accruing loans, which in turn would be driven by larger impairments in the loan portfolio and higher levels of loan charge-offs.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the allowance for loan losses was ~~66.16%~~87.97% of nonperforming assets and ~~81.70%~~111.25% of nonperforming loans, compared to 72.46% and 97.48% as of December 31, 2015. As detailed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the Company saw ~~a slight~~an increase of $4.4 million in loans rated other assets especially mentioned ~~from 1.38% to 1.87%~~but a decrease of ~~total~~$2.0 million in loans rated substandard when comparing December 31, 2015 to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, based on internally assigned risk grades. The allowance for loan losses was ~~1.36%~~1.33% of total loans on ~~both March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 1.36 % of total loans on December 31, 2015. Although an increase in ~~nonaccrual~~ loans rated other assets especially mentioned or substandard would typically warrant an increase in the allowance, ~~the increase was attributable to a single loan which management considers to be well secured. Since the loan is considered well secured, no specific reserve was provided for this loan, and~~improvements in certain qualitative factors (discussed in more detail below) resulted in an overall reduction in the allowance as a percent of total loans. In addition, certain loans ~~remained flat when comparing March 31, 2016 and~~for which there was a specific allocation at December 31, ~~2015.~~2015 either saw improvements in their condition or were charged off, thus lowering this ratio.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is based on several components. The first component of the allowance for loan losses is determined based on specifically identified loans that may become impaired. These loans are individually analyzed for impairment and include nonperforming loans and both performing and nonperforming TDRs. This component may also include loans considered impaired for other reasons, such as outdated financial information on the borrower or guarantors or financial problems of the borrower, including operating losses, marginal working capital, inadequate cash flow, or business interruptions. Changes in TDRs and nonperforming loans affect the dollar amount of the allowance. Increases in the impairment allowance for TDRs and nonperforming loans are reflected as an increase in the allowance for loan losses except in situations where the TDR or nonperforming loan does not require a specific allocation (i.e. the discounted present value of expected future cash flows or the collateral value is considered sufficient).

The majority of the Company's TDRs and nonperforming loans are collateralized by real estate. When reviewing loans for impairment, the Company obtains current appraisals when applicable. If the Company ~~has not yet received a current~~is waiting on an appraisal ~~on loans being reviewed for impairment,~~to determine the collateral's value or is in negotiations with the borrower or other parties that may affect the value of the collateral, any loan balance that is in excess of the estimated appraised value is allocated in the allowance. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the impaired loan component of the allowance for loan losses amounted to ~~$719~~$759 thousand and $798 thousand, respectively. The decrease in this component was mainly due to ~~scheduled paydowns~~improvements in the condition of the borrowers on ~~impaired~~certain loans, ~~during the first quarter of 2016.~~as well as charge-offs on loans management considered uncollectible.

Historical loss is the second component of the allowance for loan losses. The calculation of the historical loss component is conducted on loans evaluated collectively for impairment and uses migration analysis on pooled segments. These segments are based on the loan classifications set by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council in the instructions for the Call Report applicable to the Bank.

Consumer loans not secured by real estate and made to individuals for household, family and other personal expenditures are segmented into pools based on whether the loan's payments are current (including loans 1 – 29 days past due), or are 30 – 59 days past due, 60 – 89 days past due, or 90 days or more past due. All other loans, including loans to consumers that are secured by real estate, are segmented by the Company's internally assigned risk grades: substandard, other assets especially mentioned (rated just above substandard), and pass (all other loans). The Company may also assign loans to the risk grades of doubtful or loss, but as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had no loans in these categories.

- 38 -

With the December 31, 2015 and ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 calculations, the historical loss was based on the past twelve quarters. Each quarter, management evaluates the historical period used to ensure that it provides the most appropriate reflection of risk related to the current loan portfolio.

~~- 33 -~~

The final component of the allowance consists of qualitative factors and includes items such as economic conditions, growth trends, loan concentrations, changes in certain loans, changes in underwriting, changes in management and legal and regulatory changes. For the June 30, 2016 calculation, the qualitative factors which had the most significant impact on the allowance were those affected by changes in past due and nonaccrual loans, concentrations in credit, and changes in collateral-dependent loans. Past due and nonaccrual loans decreased both in dollars and as a percent of total loans when comparing June 30, 2016 to December 31, 2015, while over the same period, concentrations in certain industries declined. On a combined basis, the historical loss and qualitative factor components amounted to ~~$7.1~~$7.2 million and $6.9 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Growth in the loan portfolio is the major reason for the increase in these combined components when comparing the allowance calculation as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 to the allowance calculation as of December 31, 2015.

As a result of management's analysis, the Company added, through the provision, ~~$150 thousand~~$1.4 million to the allowance for loan losses for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and $1.3 million for the second quarter of 2016. Management believes that the allowance has been appropriately funded for losses on existing loans, based on currently available information. The Company will continue to monitor the loan portfolio and levels of nonperforming assets closely and make changes to the allowance for loan losses when necessary.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income ~~increased $388 thousand or 11.84% to $3.7~~was $3.3 million and $7.0 million in the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, ~~when compared to~~or a decrease of 2.17% from the same period in 2015. Most categories of noninterest income decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2015. The largest decrease was in income from fiduciary activities, which is heavily impacted by the market value of assets under management. Fluctuations in the stock market during the first quarter of 2016 reduced income in this category by $79 thousand when compared to the first quarter of 2015. The other significant decrease in noninterest income was a $42 thousand decrease in other operating income due to lower income from Old Point Mortgage LLC, a joint venture between the Bank and Tidewater Mortgage Services; income from Old Point Mortgage LLC was lower in the first quarter of 2016 than in the firstsecond quarter of 2015 ~~primarily as a result~~and an increase of 4.75% over the ~~refinance cycle, which increased income in the first quarter of~~six months ended June 30, 2015.

~~Also in the first quarter of 2016, the Company recognized a gain of $509 thousand on the sale of available-for-sale securities.~~ Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company re-evaluated its strategy ~~for the investment portfolio~~ to ensure it was positioned for possible future interest rate changes. This strategy was implemented in the first quarter of 2016 and included restructuring the investment portfolio through the sale and purchase of certain investments. While implementing its strategy, the Company took advantage of the opportunity to recognize gains which would offset the fee to prepay its FHLB advance, ~~and~~as well as losses on other real estate owned incurred in the sale of the properties.

Most categories of noninterest income decreased when comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 to the same periods in 2015. In both the three and six month comparisons, the Company did see increases in service charges on deposit accounts as a result of a new consumer product initiated in the third quarter of 2015. Growth in analysis fees as a result of sales efforts by the Company's Corporate Banking division also increased service charges on deposit accounts when comparing the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 to the same periods in 2015.

The largest decrease in noninterest income was in the category income from fiduciary activities, which is heavily impacted by the market value of assets under management. Fluctuations in the stock market during the first half of 2016 reduced income in this category by $116 thousand when compared to the first half of 2015. The other significant decrease in noninterest income was a $69 thousand decrease in income from Old Point Mortgage LLC, a joint venture between the Bank and Tidewater Mortgage Services; income from Old Point Mortgage LLC was lower in the first half of 2016 than in the first half of 2015 primarily as a result of the refinance cycle, which increased income in the first half of 2015.

Noninterest ~~Expense~~income in the first half of 2016 was positively impacted by sales of securities in the first quarter of the year, sales that are congruent with management's current strategy for the Company's investment portfolio. These investment portfolio sales resulted in a net gain of $509 thousand in the first quarter of 2016. In the second quarter, sharp declines in market interest rates provided the Company with the opportunity to sell certain under-performing securities for a gain, which allowed the Company to fund loan growth and reduce the portfolio's susceptibility to interest rate risk. A portion of these sales settled in June of 2016, resulting in a $6 thousand gain for the second quarter, but the majority did not settle until July of 2016. The funds received at settlement were held in other assets as of the balance sheet date.

Noninterest income in the second quarter of 2016 was impacted by the same factors as influenced noninterest income for the first half of the year, except that overall noninterest income decreased by $73 thousand, or 2.17%, in the second quarter of 2016 as compared to the second quarter of 2015. The net gains on sales of securities had a limited effect in the second quarter of 2016 because most of the net gains were recorded in the first quarter of 2016. Comparing the second quarter of 2016 to the second quarter of 2015, income from fiduciary activities and income from Old Point Mortgage LLC saw the largest declines at $37 thousand and $45 thousand, respectively, for the reasons discussed above.

- 39 -

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased ~~$804~~$795 thousand or ~~9.70%~~4.74%, when comparing the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 to the same period in ~~2015.~~2015 and decreased $9 thousand or 0.11% when comparing the second quarters of 2015 and 2016. While most categories of non-interest expense increased in the six months ended June 30, 2016, ATM and check losses decreased ~~$50~~by $109 thousand due to lower fraud losses in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2016 than in the first ~~quarter~~half of 2015. Salaries and employee benefits also decreased when comparing the first half of 2016 to the first half of 2015. The salaries component of this expense was flat when comparing these two periods, while the benefits component was mainly impacted by increases in pension and employee insurance expenses that were more than offset by decreases in accrued expense for year-end bonuses.

The most significant ~~factor in the~~ increase to noninterest expense was the $391 thousand fee for the prepayment of the FHLB advance. Although this fee represents almost half of the increase in noninterest expense for the first ~~quarter~~half of 2016, it ~~will be~~was more than offset by reduced interest expense on FHLB advances in the ~~second quarter~~first half of ~~2016.~~2016 as compared to the first half of 2015. Of the remaining categories of noninterest expense, the most significant increases ~~between~~when comparing the first ~~quarter~~half of ~~2015~~2016 and the first ~~quarter~~half of ~~2016~~2015 were in ~~salaries and employee benefits ($105 thousand, or 2.08%),~~ legal and audit expenses ($88223 thousand, or ~~77.19%~~81.39%), occupancy and equipment ($117 thousand, or 4.45%), data processing ($92 thousand, or 12.03%), and other outside service fees ($6952 thousand, or ~~60.53%), and data processing ($64 thousand, or 17.88%~~16.83%).

Salaries and employee benefits increased due to changes in actuarial estimates, which increased the Company's pension expense, and accrued expense for year-end bonuses based on anticipated improved profitability in 2016 compared to 2015. Expenses incurred in the preparation of the Company's proxy statement for its 2016 annual stockholders' meeting increased legal and audit expenses; the 2016 proxy statement included numerous proposals, including changes to the Company's articles of incorporation, the addition of an employee stock purchase plan, and the addition of a new stock incentive plan, all of which required extensive review by outside legal counsel. Occupancy and equipment increased due to additional depreciation and service contract expenses related to the Company's new, more sophisticated disaster recovery plan that was implemented in the third quarter of 2015. The new disaster recovery plan was also partially responsible for the increase in data processing expense in the first six months of 2016, as the Company established an offsite disaster recovery data center which is synchronized in real time with the Company's production systems. Data processing expense was also affected by increases in debit card expenses. Other outside service fees increased due to the outsourcing of certain loan review functions beginning in the second quarter of 2015 and servicing expenses on the Company's student loan portfolio, including the expense associated with the purchase of an additional $14.0 million portfolio in April 2015. ~~Data~~

The factors affecting the second quarter comparison between 2015 and 2016 were similar to those affecting the six month periods of the same years, with two exceptions: data processing and other outside service fees. Although data processing expense did increase in the second quarter of 2016 as compared to the second quarter of 2015, the increase was only $28 thousand, or 6.88%. Expenses in the second quarter of 2016 increased at a slower rate than in the first quarter of 2016, due in part to the de-commissioning of an unprofitable ATM.

In contrast to the increase in other outside service fees when comparing the six months ended June 30, 2016 to the same period in 2015, other outside service fees decreased $17 thousand, or 8.72%, when comparing the second quarters of these years. The two major factors that resulted in an increase in this expense in the year-to-date compare (servicing expense on student loans and outsourcing of loan review functions) began in the second quarter of 2015. As a result, these expenses had no effect on the first quarter of 2015 but were present in the first quarter of 2016, resulting in higher expense in the first six months of 2016 than in the same period in 2015. However, the expenses were present in the second quarters of both years, resulting in similar levels of expense for the second quarters of 2015 and 2016. In the second quarter of 2016, expenses for the outsourcing of loan review functions was $15 thousand lower than in the second quarter of 2015, as the Company was able to accrue for this expense over the entire year in 2016. In 2015, a similar level of annual expense for the outsourcing of loan review functions was spread over a shorter time period, as management decided to outsource these functions midway through the year. Management expects that the expense for the outsourcing of loan review functions for all of 2016 will be similar to the expense for all of 2015.

The Company's income tax expense decreased in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 when compared to the same periods in 2015. This decrease is due to ~~increases~~both lower income and changes in ~~debit card expense and~~ the Company's ~~new disaster recovery plan that~~effective tax rate between the comparable periods. The Company's effective tax rate remains low due to its investments in tax-exempt securities and its receipt of federal income tax credits for its investment in certain housing projects. As the Company's income is lower in 2016 than in 2015 while the amount of credits received in 2016 is similar to what was ~~implemented~~received in 2015, the ~~third quarter of 2015.~~Company's effective tax rate is reduced, resulting in a net tax benefit for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016.

Balance Sheet Review

Assets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 were ~~$856.8~~$897.7 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$39.9 million~~$886 thousand or ~~4.45%~~0.10% when compared to assets as of December 31, 2015. Although assets remained almost flat in the first six months of 2016, there was a significant shift in the composition of the balance sheet. Funds previously held in securities, as well as available liquidity from cash and due from banks, were reinvested in loans. On a combined basis, securities available-for-sale and cash and cash equivalents decreased $52.8 million, while net loans grew $29.5 million.

- 40 -

The largest increase in the loan portfolio was in the other loans segment. The majority of this segment is made up of draws on warehouse lines that provide funding to mortgage companies. The balances on these lines are typically low at year-end, as mortgage loan activity tends to peak during the summer months. Management expects the balances on these lines to approximate their December 31, 2015 levels at the end of 2016. The commercial loans secured by real estate, construction, and commercial loans not secured by real estate segments of the loan portfolio also increased between December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2016 as a result of improvements in quality loan demand in the Company's ~~net loan portfolio did increase $4.9~~market area. Management expects growth in these segments to continue during the second half of 2016.

On the liabilities side of the balance sheet, total deposits declined 2.61% from $746.5 million at December 31, 2015 to $727.0 million at June 30, 2016. Management believes this decline in deposits to be temporary, as deposit balances have historically been lower in June before increasing again during the second half of the year. The declines in deposits were offset by advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). In the first quarter of 2016, management made a strategic decision to prepay a $25.0 million advance, which would have matured in June of 2016. Although this prepayment required the Company to pay a fee of $391 thousand, it saved $456 thousand in interest expense during 2016, for a net increase ~~was funded through reductions in~~to pre-tax income of $65 thousand. In the ~~securities portfolio rather than through balance sheet growth. The reduction in the balance sheet was driven primarily by the liabilities side: in the first~~second quarter of 2016, ~~total deposits decreased $21.8 million, while at the same time,~~ the Company ~~paid~~took out additional borrowings from the FHLB at significantly lower rates than that carried by the advance that was prepaid. These new advances are for shorter terms, allowing the Company to obtain additional liquidity when necessary without maintaining excess liquidity on the balance sheet.

In addition, the Company sold certain securities in the second quarter to limit the portfolio's susceptibility to interest rate risk and help fund loan growth. With the recent sharp declines in market interest rates, the Company was able to sell for a gain certain under-performing securities. The securities sold were all mortgage-backed securities with rates that have been below market for some time. As management expects that rates will eventually begin to increase, and the increased loan growth necessitated a need for additional funding, the Company sold these securities while the market value was above the Company's book value. A portion of this sale settled in June of 2016, resulting in a $6 thousand gain for the second quarter, but $24.5 million did not settle until July of 2016. The liquidity from this sale was used to pay off ~~its $25.0 million~~a portion of the Company's shorter-term FHLB ~~advance. On the asset side~~advances as they came due. The funds received at settlement were held in other assets as of the balance sheet ~~these reductions~~date, resulting in ~~liabilities were funded by the securities portfolio and excess liquidity in cash and due from banks. The securities portfolio declined $19.7 million, primarily as a result~~an increase to other assets of ~~sales of investment securities, while cash and due from banks decreased $21.2 million.~~171.31%.

~~- 34 -~~

Average assets for the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 were ~~$863.5~~$861.2 million compared to ~~$876.3~~$883.2 million for the first ~~three~~six months of 2015, a decrease of ~~$12.8~~$22.0 million or ~~1.46%~~2.49%. Comparing the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 to the first ~~three~~six months of 2015, lower yielding balances held in investment securities and cash and cash equivalents moved to higher yielding loans. Average loans increased ~~$28.6~~$20.8 million and average investment securities decreased by ~~$26.7~~$28.3 million when comparing the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 to the same period in 2015. The remainder of the decrease in securities was used to offset the $8.3 million decline in average federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other borrowings, which was mainly caused by decreases in customer balances in overnight repurchase accounts.

The Company's holdings of "Alt-A" type mortgage loans such as adjustable rate and nontraditional type loans were inconsequential, amounting to less than 1.00% of the Company's loan portfolio as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

The Company does not have a formal program for subprime lending. The Company is required by law to comply with the requirements of the Community Reinvestment Act (the CRA), which imposes on financial institutions an affirmative and ongoing obligation to meet the credit needs of their local communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. In order to comply with the CRA and meet the credit needs of its local communities, the Company finds it necessary to make certain loans with subprime characteristics.

- 41 -

For the purposes of this discussion, a "subprime loan" is defined as a loan to a borrower having a credit score of 660 or below. The majority of the Company's subprime loans are to customers in the Company's local market area. The following table details the Company's loans with subprime characteristics that were secured by 1-4 family first mortgages, 1-4 family open-end loans (i.e., equity lines of credit) and 1-4 family junior lien loans (e.g., second mortgages) for which the Company has recorded a credit score in its system.

Loans Secured by 1 - 4 Family First Mortgages,	Loans Secured by 1 - 4 Family First Mortgages,						Loans Secured by 1 - 4 Family First Mortgages,
1 - 4 Family Open-end and 1 - 4 Family Junior Liens	1 - 4 Family Open-end and 1 - 4 Family Junior Liens						1 - 4 Family Open-end and 1 - 4 Family Junior Liens
As of March 31, 2016
As of June 30, 2016							As of June 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands)	(dollars in thousands)						(dollars in thousands)

		Amount		Percent				Amount		Percent
Subprime		$	20,219		13.43	%		$	20,396		13.37	%
Non-subprime			130,349		86.57	%			132,131		86.63	%
		$	150,568		100.00	%		$	152,527		100.00	%

Total loans		$	573,475					$	598,161

Percentage of Real Estate-Secured Subprime Loans to Total Loans	Percentage of Real Estate-Secured Subprime Loans to Total Loans				3.53	%	Percentage of Real Estate-Secured Subprime Loans to Total Loans				3.41	%

In addition to the subprime loans secured by real estate discussed above, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company had an additional ~~$1.0 million~~$911 thousand in subprime consumer loans that were either not government guaranteed, were unsecured or were secured by collateral other than real estate. Together with the subprime loans secured by real estate, the Company's total subprime loans as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 were ~~$21.2~~$21.3 million, amounting to ~~3.70%~~3.56% of the Company's total loans at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

Additionally, the Company has no investments secured by "Alt-A" type mortgage loans such as adjustable rate and nontraditional type mortgages or subprime loans.

Capital Resources

Total stockholders' equity as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 was ~~$94.2~~$95.9 million, an increase of ~~$1.0~~$2.8 million or ~~1.12%~~2.96% from $93.2 million at December 31, ~~2015. New capital requirements known as the Basel III Final Rules were effective January 1,~~ 2015.

For purposes of the Basel III Final Rules (i) common equity Tier 1 capital (CET1) consists principally of common stock (including surplus) and retained earnings; (ii) Tier 1 capital consists principally of CET1 plus non-cumulative preferred stock and related surplus, and certain grandfathered cumulative preferred stock and trust preferred securities; and (iii) Tier 2 capital consists principally of qualifying subordinated debt and preferred stock, and limited amounts of the allowance for loan losses. Total Capital is Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital. Each regulatory capital classification is subject to certain adjustments and limitations, as implemented by the Basel III Final Rules. The Basel III Final Rules also implement a "countercyclical capital buffer," generally designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and to be imposed when national regulators determine that excess aggregate credit growth becomes associated with a buildup of systemic risk. The Basel III Final Rules are discussed in detail in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

~~- 35 -~~

The following is a summary of the Company's capital ratios at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. As shown below, these ratios were all well above the regulatory minimum levels, and demonstrate that the Company's capital position remains strong.

	2016						2016
	Regulatory			March 31, 2016			Regulatory
	Minimums						Minimums			June 30, 2016
Common Equity Tier 1 Capital		5.125	%		13.91	%		5.125	%		12.99	%
Tier 1 Capital		6.625	%		13.91	%		6.625	%		12.99	%
Tier 1 Leverage		4.625	%		11.23	%		4.625	%		11.30	%
Total Capital		8.625	%		15.03	%		8.625	%		14.05	%

Book value per share was ~~$19.00~~$19.35 at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to ~~$18.06~~$18.07 at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Cash dividends were ~~$496~~$992 thousand or ~~$0.10~~$0.20 per share in the first ~~three~~six months of 2016 and ~~$396~~$793 thousand or ~~$0.08~~$0.16 per share in the first ~~three~~six months of 2015.

- 42 -

Liquidity

Liquidity is the ability of the Company to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, investments in securities and loans maturing within one year. The Company's internal sources of such liquidity are deposits, loan and investment repayments and securities available-for-sale. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Bank's unpledged, available-for-sale securities totaled ~~$90.4~~$105.0 million. The Company's primary external source of liquidity is advances from the FHLB.

A major source of the Company's liquidity is its large, stable deposit base. As discussed above, management believes the deposit base remains stable, despite a 2.61% decline from $746.5 million at December 31, 2015 to $727.0 million at June 30, 2016. In addition, secondary liquidity sources are available through the use of borrowed funds if the need should arise, including secured advances from the FHLB. As of the end of the ~~first~~second quarter of 2016, the Company had ~~$255.5~~$129.7 million in FHLB borrowing availability. The Company's securities available-for-sale declined 22.40% from $214.2 million at December 31, 2015 to $166.2 million at June 30, 2016. Borrowing availability from the FHLB has decreased due to reductions in the Company's liquidity, as securities are a primary source of collateral for these borrowings. The Company believes that the remaining availability at the FHLB is sufficient to meet future cash-flow needs. The Company also has available short-term, unsecured borrowed funds in the form of federal funds lines of credit with correspondent banks. As of the end of the ~~first~~second quarter of 2016, the Company had $50.0 million available in federal funds lines to address any short-term borrowing needs.

~~Management~~As disclosed in the Company's consolidated statements of cash flows, net cash provided by operating activities was $2.9 million, net cash used in operating activities was $5.1 million and net cash used in operating activities was $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Combined, this contributed to a $4.8 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Other than as discussed above, management is not aware of any market or institutional trends, events or uncertainties that are expected to have a material effect on the liquidity, capital resources or operations of the Company. Nor is management aware of any current recommendations by regulatory authorities that would have a material effect on liquidity, capital resources or operations.

As a result of the Company's management of liquid assets, the availability of borrowed funds and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors' requirements and to meet its customers' future borrowing needs.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company's ability to maintain sufficient liquidity may be affected by numerous factors, including economic conditions nationally and in the Company's markets. Depending on its liquidity levels, its capital position, conditions in the capital markets and other factors, the Company may from time to time consider the issuance of debt, equity, other securities or other possible capital markets transactions, the proceeds of which could provide additional liquidity for the Company's operations.

Contractual Obligations

In the normal course of business there are various outstanding contractual obligations of the Company that will require future cash outflows. In addition, there are commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit that may or may not require cash outflows.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, there have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in the Company's contractual obligations disclosed in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, there were no material changes in the Company's off-balance sheet arrangements disclosed in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

An important element of earnings performance and the maintenance of sufficient liquidity is proper management of the interest sensitivity gap. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between interest sensitive assets and interest sensitive liabilities in a specific time interval. This gap can be managed by re-pricing assets or liabilities, which are variable rate instruments, by replacing an asset or liability at maturity or by adjusting the interest rate during the life of the asset or liability. Matching the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing in the same time interval helps to offset interest rate risk and to minimize the impact of rising or falling interest rates on net interest income.

- 3643 -

The Company determines the overall magnitude of interest sensitivity risk and then formulates policies governing asset generation and pricing, funding sources and pricing, and off-balance sheet commitments. These decisions are based on management's expectations regarding future interest rate movements, the state of the national and regional economy, and other financial and business risk factors. The Company uses computer simulations to measure the effect of various interest rate scenarios on net interest income. This modeling reflects interest rate changes and the related impact on net interest income and net income over specified time horizons.

Based on scheduled maturities only, the Company was liability sensitive at the one-year time frame as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. It should be noted, however, that non-maturing deposit liabilities, which consist of money market, savings and interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking accounts, are less interest sensitive than other market driven deposits. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, non-maturing deposit liabilities totaled ~~$516.6~~$518.7 million or ~~71.28%~~71.35% of total deposit liabilities.

In a rising rate environment, changes in these deposit rates have historically lagged behind the changes in earning asset rates, thus mitigating the impact from the liability sensitivity position indicated by the static gap analysis. Income simulation analysis allows the Company to reflect the expected differences in re-pricing behavior among various assets and liabilities to more reliably measure the potential effects on income from changes in the interest rate environment. Utilizing this income simulation methodology, the model reveals that the Company is asset sensitive at the one-year time frame as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

When the Company is liability sensitive, net interest income should improve if interest rates fall since liabilities will reprice faster than assets (depending on the optionality or prepayment speeds of the assets). Conversely, if interest rates rise, net interest income should decline. When the Company is asset sensitive, net interest income should improve if interest rates rise and fall if rates fall.

The most likely scenario represents the rate environment as management forecasts it to occur. Management uses a "static" test to measure the effects of changes in interest rates on net interest income. This test assumes that management takes no steps to adjust the balance sheet to respond to the rate change by re-pricing assets/liabilities, as discussed in the first paragraph of this section.

Under the rate environment forecasted by management, rate changes in 50 to 100 basis point increments are applied to assess the impact on the Company's earnings at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. The rate change model assumes that these changes will occur gradually over the course of a year. The model reveals that a 50 basis point ramped decrease in rates would cause an approximate ~~0.23%~~ annual decrease of 0.60% in net interest income. The model reveals that a 50 basis point ramped rise in rates would cause an approximate ~~0.20%~~ annual increase of 0.53% in net interest income and that a 100 basis point ramped rise in rates would cause an approximate ~~0.33%~~annual increase of 0.58% in net interest income.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Management evaluated, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating its disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). No changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fiscal quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

- 3744 -

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, is a party or to which the property of the Company or any of its subsidiaries is subject that, in the opinion of management, may materially impact the financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors faced by the Company from those disclosed in the Company's 2015 annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Pursuant to the Company's ~~stock option~~equity compensation plans, participants may pay the exercise ~~stock options~~price of certain awards or satisfy tax withholding requirements associated with awards by surrendering shares of the Company's common stock that the participants already own. Shares surrendered by participants of these plans are repurchased at current market value pursuant to the terms of the applicable ~~stock options.~~awards. During the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company did not repurchase any shares related to the exercise of ~~stock options.~~awards or the satisfaction of tax withholding requirements associated with awards.

During the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the Company did not repurchase any shares pursuant to the Company's stock repurchase program.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

On August 9, 2016, the Company's Board of Directors (the Board) amended and restated the Company's Bylaws (the Amended Bylaws). The Amended Bylaws were effective immediately and below are brief descriptions of the substantive amendments that were made in the Amended Bylaws. The Amended Bylaws:

1.	Amended Article I, Section 1.2 to increase the percentage of stockholders required to call a special meeting of the stockholders of the Company from 10% to 25% of all of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.

2.	Added new Article I, Section 1.4(a), (c) and (d) to provide detailed timing, procedural and disclosure requirements for stockholders wishing to present business at annual and special meetings of stockholders of the Company.

Added new Article I, Section 1.4(b) and (c) to amend the timing, procedural and disclosure requirements for stockholders wishing to nominate individuals to serve as directors of the Company at annual and special meetings of stockholders of the Company, the former requirements for which were previously in Article II, Section 2.4.

4.	Amended previous Article I, Section 1.4 to now be Article I, Section 1.5, which provides authority for adjourning meetings of stockholders of the Company to the chairman of the meeting or a majority of shares represented at the meeting and provides for the mechanics in connection therewith.

5.	Added new Article I, Section 1.6 to provide the Board with authority to postpone or reschedule a meeting of stockholders of the Company.

6.	Added new Article I, Sections 1.7 and 1.8 to provide procedures and conduct to be followed at meetings of the stockholders of the Company.

7.	Added new Article II, Section 2.4 to implement a director resignation policy for any incumbent director who is not reelected in accordance with the voting requirements in the Company's Articles of Incorporation and no successor has been elected.

- 45 -

Added new Article XI to include an exclusive forum clause designating the Norfolk or Newport News Divisions of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, or, in the event that court lacks jurisdiction, the Hampton Circuit Court, as the exclusive forum for any stockholder derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty claims, other claims relating to Virginia corporate law and actions asserting claims governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

Certain additional nonsubstantive amendments were also made in the Amended Bylaws. The foregoing description of changes in the Amended Bylaws does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended Bylaws, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 3.2 hereto and which is incorporated herein by reference.

The Company has made no changes to the ~~procedures~~process by which security holders may recommend nominees to its board of ~~directors.~~directors, which is discussed in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Company's 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

~~- 38 -~~

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Old Point Financial Corporation, as amended effective June 22, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K filed March 12, 2009)

3.1.1		Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Old Point Financial Corporation, effective May 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to Form 8-K filed May 31, 2016)

3.2		Bylaws of Old Point Financial Corporation, as amended and restated ~~March 8, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed March 10, 2011)~~August 9, 2016

~~10.14~~10.6		Settlement Agreement dated March 16, 2016 among Old Point Financial Corporation, Financial Edge Fund, L.P., Financial Edge-Strategic Fund, L.P., PL Capital/Focused Fund, L.P., PL Capital, LLC, PL Capital Advisors, LLC, Goodbody/PL Capital, L.P., Goodbody/PL Capital, LLC, Mr. John W. Palmer and Mr. Richard J. Lashley, as Managing MembersBase Salaries of ~~PL Capital, LLC, PL Capital Advisors, LLC and Goodbody/PL Capital, LLC and Mr. William F. Keefe~~Executive Officers of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~10.1~~10.6 to Form 10-K filed March 11, 2016)

10.15		Old Point Financial Corporation 2016 Incentive Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 8-K filed ~~March 17,~~May 31, 2016)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		The following materials from Old Point Financial Corporation's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language), filed herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited for ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~ (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		OLD POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION

~~May~~August 10, 2016		/s/Robert F. Shuford, Sr.
		Robert F. Shuford, Sr.
		Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

~~May~~August 10, 2016		/s/Laurie D. Grabow
		Laurie D. Grabow
		Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance
		(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)

- 3946 -