UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



☒		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019
OR
□☐		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-9025

Vista-Logo-2-300dpi

VISTA GOLD CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



British Columbia		98-0542444
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~Suite 5,~~ 7961 Shaffer Parkway, Suite 5
Littleton, Colorado		80127
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(720) 981-1185

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class:	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Shares, no par value	VGZ	NYSE American

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒No □

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒☒No □☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large Accelerated Filer □☐ Accelerated Filer ☒Non-Accelerated Filer □☐

Smaller Reporting Company □ ☒Emerging Growth Company □☐



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes □☐ No ☒

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date: ~~100,145,811~~100,661,457 common shares, without par value, outstanding as of October ~~22, 2018.~~

14, 2019.

Table of Contents

VISTA GOLD CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019

INDEX


	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	15
~~ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~	2614
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	2627
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	2728
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	2728
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	2728
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	2728
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE	2728
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	2728
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	2829
SIGNATURES

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

VISTA GOLD CORP.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars and in thousands, except shares)



	September 30,		December 31,		September 30,		December 31,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,163	$	1,431	$	1,384	$	1,071
Short-term investments (Note 3)		9,029		15,144		3,111		6,997
Other investments, at fair value (Note 3)		5,500		3,746		3,511		5,462
Other current assets		227		794		210		540
Total current assets		15,919		21,115		8,216		14,070

Non-current assets:
Mineral properties (Note 4)		2,471		2,471		2,146		2,421
Plant and equipment, net (Note 5)		7,389		7,555		5,635		5,635
Right-of-use assets (Note 2)						113		—
Total non-current assets		9,860		10,026		7,894		8,056
Total assets	$	25,779	$	31,141	$	16,110	$	22,126

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	217	$	830	$	193	$	195
Accrued liabilities and other		493		986		604		435
Provision for environmental liability		242		242		240		242
Total current liabilities		952		2,058		1,037		872
Non-current liabilities:
Deferred option gain (Note 4)						1,392		—
Lease liability (Note 2)						16		—
Total non-current liabilities						1,408		—
Total liabilities		952		2,058		2,445		872

Commitments and contingencies – (Note 7)
Shareholders' equity:
Common shares, no par value - unlimited shares authorized; shares outstanding: 2018 - 100,089,561 and 2017 - 99,412,007 (Note 6)		456,730		456,053
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		(2)
Shareholders’ equity:
Common shares, no par value - unlimited shares authorized; shares outstanding: 2019 - 100,661,457 and 2018 - 100,268,161 (Note 6)						457,543		456,938
Accumulated deficit		(431,903)		(426,968)		(443,878)		(435,684)
Total shareholders' equity		24,827		29,083
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	25,779	$	31,141
Total shareholders’ equity						13,665		21,254
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity					$	16,110	$	22,126

Approved by the Board of Directors

Racy A. S

/s/ Tracy A. Stevenson

Tracy A. Stevenson

Director

/s/ John M. Clark

John M. Clark

Director

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

VISTA GOLD CORP.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars and in thousands, except ~~share~~shares and per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Operating expense:
Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs	$	(960)	$	(1,635)	$	(3,560)	$	(4,695)	$	(1,401)	$	(960)	$	(3,294)	$	(3,560)
Corporate administration		(969)		(823)		(3,280)		(2,619)		(865)		(969)		(3,079)		(3,280)
Depreciation and amortization		(12)		(137)		(252)		(455)		(14)		(12)		(40)		(252)
Gain on disposal of mineral properties, net (Note 4)		—		—		—		358
Total operating expense		(1,941)		(2,595)		(7,092)		(7,411)		(2,280)		(1,941)		(6,413)		(7,092)

Non-operating income/(expense):
(Loss)/gain on other investments (Note 3)		(274)		(78)		1,754		(858)
Gain/(loss) on other investments (Note 3)										(234)		(274)		(1,951)		1,754
Interest income		72		38		322		117		27		72		103		322
Other income/(expense)		81		(20)		83		(32)		(11)		81		67		83
Total non-operating income/(expense)		(121)		(60)		2,159		(773)		(218)		(121)		(1,781)		2,159

Loss before income taxes										(2,498)		(2,062)		(8,194)		(4,933)
Net loss	$	(2,062)	$	(2,655)	$	(4,933)	$	(8,184)	$	(2,498)	$	(2,062)	$	(8,194)	$	(4,933)

Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized fair value increase/ (decrease) on available-for-sale securities		—		1		—		(20)
Comprehensive loss	$	(2,062)	$	(2,654)	$	(4,933)	$	(8,204)	$	(2,498)	$	(2,062)	$	(8,194)	$	(4,933)

Basic:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		99,805,266		98,993,395		99,600,267		98,363,761		100,606,542		99,805,266		100,490,309		99,600,267
Net loss per share	$	(0.02)	$	(0.03)	$	(0.05)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.02)	$	(0.02)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.05)

Diluted:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		99,805,266		98,993,395		99,600,267		98,363,761		100,606,542		99,805,266		100,490,309		99,600,267
Net loss per share	$	(0.02)	$	(0.03)	$	(0.05)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.02)	$	(0.02)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.05)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

VISTA GOLD CORP.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars and in ~~thousands)~~thousands, except shares)

Accumulated other

Total

Common

Accumulated

comprehensive

shareholders'


shares

Amount

deficit

income/(loss)

equity

Balances at December 31, 2016

97,786,608

$
455,443

$
(414,933)

$
15

$
40,525

Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld)

1,625,399

(264)

—

—

(264)

Stock-based compensation

—

874

—

—

874

Other comprehensive loss

—

—

—

(17)

(17)

Net loss

—

—

(12,035)

—

(12,035)

Balances at December 31, 2017

99,412,007

$
456,053

$
(426,968)

$
(2)

$
29,083

Cumulative adjustment related to Accounting Standard Update 2016-01

—

—

(2)

2

—

Adjusted balance at January 1, 2018

99,412,007

456,053

(426,970)

—

29,083

Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld)

637,554

(122)

—

(122)

Shares issued (exercise of stock options)

40,000

16

—

16

Stock-based compensation

—

855

—

855

Option amendment (Note 6)

—

(72)

—

(72)

Net loss

—

—

(4,933)

(4,933)

Balances at September 30, 2018

100,089,561

$
456,730

$
(431,903)

$
—

$
24,827


						Accumulated other		Total
	Common			Accumulated		comprehensive		shareholders’
	shares	Amount		deficit		income/(loss)		equity
Balances at July 1, 2018	99,569,949	$	456,614	$	(429,841)	$	—	$	26,773
Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld) (Note 6)	509,612		(83)		—				(83)
Shares issued (exercise of stock options) (Note 6)	10,000		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation (Note 6)	—		271		—		—		271
Option Amendment (Note 6)	—		(72)		—		—		(72)
Net loss	—		—		(2,062)		—		(2,062)
Balances at September 30, 2018	100,089,561	$	456,730	$	(431,903)	$	—	$	24,827

Balances at July 1, 2019	100,537,541	$	457,425	$	(441,380)	$	—	$	16,045
Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld) (Note 6)	123,916		(30)		—		—		(30)
Stock-based compensation (Note 6)	—		148		—		—		148
Net loss	—		—		(2,498)		—		(2,498)
Balances at September 30, 2019	100,661,457	$	457,543	$	(443,878)	$	—	$	13,665

						Accumulated other		Total
	Common			Accumulated		comprehensive		shareholders’
	shares	Amount		deficit		income/(loss)		equity
Balances at December 31, 2017	99,412,007	$	456,053	$	(426,968)	$	(2)	$	29,083
Cumulative adjustment related to Accounting Standard Update 2016-01	—		—		(2)		2		—
Adjusted balances at January 1, 2018	99,412,007		456,053		(426,970)		—		29,083
Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld) (Note 6)	637,554		(122)		—		—		(122)
Shares issued (exercise of stock options)	40,000		16		—		—		16
Stock-based compensation (Note 6)	—		855		—		—		855
Option Amendment (Note 6)	—		(72)		—		—		(72)
Net loss	—		—		(4,933)		—		(4,933)
Balances at September 30, 2018	100,089,561	$	456,730	$	(431,903)	$	—	$	24,827


Balances at January 1, 2019	100,268,161	$	456,938	$	(435,684)	$	—	$	21,254
Shares issued (RSUs vested, net of shares withheld) (Note 6)	266,296		(76)		—		—		(76)
Shares issued (exercise of stock options) (Note 6)	127,000		66		—		—		66
Stock-based compensation (Note 6)	—		615		—		—		615
Net loss	—		—		(8,194)		—		(8,194)
Balances at September 30, 2019	100,661,457	$	457,543	$	(443,878)	$	—	$	13,665

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

VISTA GOLD CORP.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars and in thousands)


	Nine months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2019		2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss for the period	$	(4,933)	$	(8,184)
Net loss					$	(8,194)	$	(4,933)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss for the period to net cash used in operations:
Depreciation and amortization		252		455		40		252
Stock-based compensation		855		680		615		855
Gain on disposal of mineral property		—		(358)
(Gain)/loss on other investments		(1,754)		858		1,951		(1,754)
Change in working capital account items:
Other current assets		411		104		217		411
Provision for environmental liability						(2)		—
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other		(1,178)		378		183		(1,178)
Net cash used in operating activities		(6,347)		(6,067)		(5,190)		(6,347)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		156		—		—		156
Disposition of short-term investments, net of acquisitions		6,115		5,317		3,886		6,115
Additions to plant and equipment		(86)		—		(40)		(86)
Proceeds from option/sale agreements, net		—		358		1,667		—
Net cash provided by investing activities		6,185		5,675		5,513		6,185
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payment of taxes from withheld shares		(122)		(264)		(76)		(122)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		16		—		66		16
Net cash used in financing activities		(106)		(264)
Net cash provided by / (used in) financing activities						(10)		(106)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(268)		(656)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents						313		(268)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,431		1,904		1,071		1,431
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,163	$	1,248	$	1,384	$	1,163

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

VISTA GOLD CORP.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollar amounts in U.S. dollars and in thousands, except share amounts and per ounce amounts)

1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Vista Gold Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Vista,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) operate in the gold mining industry. We are focused on ~~the~~ evaluation, acquisition, exploration and advancement of gold exploration and potential development projects, which may lead to gold production or value adding strategic transactions such as earn-in right agreements, option agreements, leases to third parties, joint venture arrangements with other mining companies, or outright sales of assets for cash and/or other consideration. We ~~look for opportunities~~undertake programs designed to improve the value of our gold projects through exploration drilling and/or technical studies focused on optimizing previous engineering work.

The Company’s flagship asset is its 100% owned Mt Todd gold project (“Mt Todd” or the “Project”) in ~~the~~ Northern Territory, ~~(“NT”)~~ Australia. Mt Todd is the largest undeveloped gold project in Australia. In January 2018, the Company received authorization for the last major environmental permit ~~and we~~for Mt Todd. In September 2019, Vista announced the positive results of an updated preliminary feasibility study (the ~~“PFS”~~“2019 PFS”) for Mt Todd. ~~Subsequently, Vista has completed additional metallurgical testing, including ongoing fine grinding evaluations, which demonstrate further~~ Process improvements reflected in the 2019 PFS have resulted in improved estimated gold ~~recovery. With these important milestones~~recovery and subsequent project improvements complete, Vista is in a better position to identify and pursue those strategic alternatives that may provide the best opportunity for shareholders to realize fair value forincreased estimated gold production at Mt Todd. We

As of September 30, 2019, the Company also ~~hold~~holds 7.8 million ~~shares of the outstanding~~ common shares ~~in the capital~~ of Midas Gold Corp. (“Midas Gold Shares”), a non-core project in Mexico subject to a third-party option agreement, and royalty interests in the United States and Indonesia.

The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“interim statements”) of the Company are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities regulatory authorities on ~~March 6, 2018~~Form 10-K, as amended on Form ~~10-K.~~10-K/A on August 15, 2019. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from ~~the~~ audited financial statements and, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, certain information and footnote disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.

References to ~~A$ are to Australian currency and~~ $ are to United States ~~currency.~~dollars and A$ are to Australian dollars.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

~~Revenue Recognition~~

New FASB guidance issued under ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), as amended, is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Under ASU No. 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. This includes significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract.

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new guidance retrospectively. The Company performed an assessment of the revised guidance and the impacts on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures. We also evaluated the potential for future variable consideration from option payments, net smelter return royalties (“NSR”), and other production related payments, and determined that there is no impact to the Company’s current accounting. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance will primarily impact the timing of revenue recognition on certain option agreements based on the Company’s determination of when control is transferred for accounting purposes. Based on the contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2017, there was no cumulative effect adjustment required to be recognized at January 1, 2018. Under the Company’s adoption approach, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018, will be presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements under the new guidance, while prior period amounts will not be adjusted and continue to be reported under the guidance in effect for those periods.

~~Table of Contents~~

Currently, proceeds received from option agreements are ascribed to recovery of the carrying value of the related project until the carrying value reaches zero. After that, any additional proceeds received will be recognized as a contract liability until control has transferred to the buyer or the related contract has terminated. None of the projects which could provide the Company with future variable consideration are currently in production, and in all cases, we believe there is low probability of future production from these projects. Accordingly, the Company believes its NSRs and other production related payments are fully constrained, and the Company did not record a receivable for them. When it becomes probable that a project which could provide the Company with an NSR or other production related payments could begin production, the Company will evaluate the accounting treatment at that time.

Lease Accounting

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ~~The~~This new standard ~~establishes~~established a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases ~~will be~~are classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The ~~new~~Company adopted the standard ~~is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. A~~on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Based upon our initial review, we expect to recognizeapproach. We recognized additional ~~operating~~ liabilities of ~~approximately $125 to $225~~$186 on adoption, with corresponding ROU assets of the same amount, based on the present value of the remaining lease payments.

~~Nonemployee Share-Based Payments~~

The FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU No. 2018-07, supersedes the guidance for equity-based payments to non-employees (Topic ASC 505-50). Under the new standard, an entity should treat equity-based payments to nonemployees the same as stock-based compensation to employees in most cases. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Effective July 1, 2018, the Company adopted the new guidance. The Company performed an assessment Adoption of the standard did not affect lease classification or expense recognition. The Company does not include short term leases in its ROU asset and lease liability calculations. As of September 30, 2019, the ROU asset was $113 and the ~~impacts on the~~lease liability was $113, comprised of $97 included in accrued liabilities and other, and $16 in non-current liabilities. The Company’s ~~Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures. Based on our analysis, adoption~~leases had remaining terms ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 years as of ~~the standard will not materially change the Company’s expense recognition and disclosures.~~ September 30, 2019.

Table of Contents

3. Short-term and Other Investments

Short-term investments

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the amortized cost basis of our short-term investments was ~~$9,029~~$3,111 and ~~$15,144,~~$6,997, respectively. The amortized cost basis approximates fair value at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. Short-term investments at September 30,~~, 2018~~ 2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 ~~are~~were comprised of U.S. government treasury bills and/or notes, all of which ~~have~~had maturity dates on the date of purchase greater than 90 days but less than one year.

Other investments - Midas Gold Shares

~~Upon initial recognition of our investment in the Midas Gold Shares, we elected to apply the fair value option, and as such, the~~The Company’s investment in Midas Gold Shares iswas recorded at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequent changes in fair value are recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) in the period in which they occur.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~The following table summarizes our investment in Midas Gold Shares as~~As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017.~~ 2018, the Company held 7,802,615 shares of Midas Gold valued at $3,511 and $5,462 respectively. The unrealized loss on these shares was $234 and $1,951 for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2019, respectively. The unrealized loss on these shares was $274 and the unrealized gain was $1,754 for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2018, respectively.

September 30, 2018

December 31, 2017

Fair value at beginning of period

$
3,746

$
4,994

Gain/(loss) during the period

1,754

(1,248)

Fair value at end of period

$
5,500

$
3,746

Midas Gold Shares held at the end of the period

7,802,615

7,802,615

4. Mineral Properties


	At September 30, 2018		At December 31, 2017		At September 30, 2019		At December 31, 2018
Mt Todd, Australia	$	2,146	$	2,146	$	2,146	$	2,146
Guadalupe de los Reyes, Mexico		325		325		—		275
	$	2,471	$	2,471	$	2,146	$	2,421

During October 2017, we entered into an agreement (the “Option Agreement”) to option our interest in the Guadalupe de los Reyes gold and silver project in Sinaloa, Mexico ~~(the “GdlR Project”~~(“Los Reyes”) to Minera Alamos Inc. and its subsidiary Minera Alamos de Sonora S.A. de C.V. (“Minera Alamos”). In June 2019, the Option Agreement was assigned from Minera Alamos to ePower Metals Inc. by way of assignment agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”), with our consent. ePower Metals Inc. subsequently changed its name to Prime Mining Corporation (“Prime Mining”). The Assignment Agreement provides that in certain circumstances, the rights under the Option Agreement will revert from Prime Mining to Minera Alamos.

Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement and the Assignment Agreement, we granted Minera Alamos or Prime Mining, as applicable, (the “Optionholder”) an exclusive right and option right to earn a 100% interest in the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project by:

making payments totaling $6,000, comprised of a payment of $1,500 made at the execution of the Option Agreement ~~(“Option~~(the “Option Grant Date”); two successive payments of $1,500 each to be made at the one-year and two-year anniversaries of the Option Grant Date; and a final $1,500 payment to be made before the four-year anniversary of the Option Grant Date;

maintaining the concessions comprising the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project in good standing;

fulfilling all ~~of our~~ obligations to the Ejido La Tasajera (the “Ejido”) as set out in the temporary occupation contract between us and the Ejido;

granting us a capped ~~NSR~~net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) on production from open pit mining (the “Open Pit NSR”) at rates that range from 1% (at gold prices of $1,400/oz or less) to a maximum of 2% (at gold prices above $1,600/oz) up to an aggregate of $2,000 in royalty payments;

Table of Contents

granting us a perpetual NSR on production from underground mining (the “Underground NSR”) at rates that range from 1% (at gold prices of $1,400/oz or less) to a maximum of 2% (at gold prices above $1,600/oz); and

granting us the right to assume a 49% non-carried interest in an underground project if ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder decides to develop an underground mine at the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project (the “Back-in Right”).

The Option Agreement provides that all cash payments are non-refundable and optional to ~~Minera Alamos,~~the Optionholder, and in the event ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder fails to pay any of the required amounts as set out in the Option Agreement, or fails to comply with its other obligations, the Option Agreement will terminate and ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder will have no interest in the ~~GdlR Project.~~Los Reyes project. Provided it is not in breach of the Option Agreement, ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder may, at its discretion, ~~advance~~accelerate the above payment schedule.

Subject to ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder timely making all the option payments, and fulfilling its other obligations with respect to the Option Agreement, we will transfer 100% of the shares of the Company’s 100% owned subsidiary Minera Gold Stake S.A. de C.V., the entity which owns the ~~GdlR Project,~~Los Reyes project, to ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder and the Open-Pit NSR and Underground NSR will be granted to us.

~~Table of Contents~~

If ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder discovers and decides to develop an underground mine at the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project and we exercise the Back-in Right, we and ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder have agreed to form a joint venture to develop and operate the underground mine. If the joint venture is formed, the Underground NSR will terminate.

In October 2018, the Company agreed to extend the due date for the second $1,500 option payment under the Los Reyes Option Agreement by six months to April 23, 2019, at which time the payment was made. As consideration for the deferral, the Company received an additional $150 in cash, $50 paid on October 24, 2018 and $100 paid on January 23, 2019. In addition, Minera Alamos paid interest of $67 at a rate of 1.5% per month on the unpaid balance of the $1,500 payment beginning January 24, 2019.

The Company has determined that control of the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project has not been transferred for accounting purposes. ~~The~~Therefore, the first option payment of $1,500 received in October 2017 ~~has been~~and the $150 for extension of the second option payment were accounted for as a reduction to carrying value. ~~Subsequent~~Receipt of the second option ~~payments received, if any, will be accounted for as further reductions to carrying value. After~~payment of $1,500 and interest of $67 during April 2019 reduced the carrying value ~~has been reduced~~ to zero ~~remaining~~and resulted in recognition of $1,392 as a deferred option gain. The third Los Reyes project option payment ~~proceeds, if any,~~of $1,500 was received from Prime Mining in October 2019. This receipt will be ~~recognized~~recorded as ~~a contract liability until control of the GdlR Project has transferred to the buyer or the Option Agreement has been terminated.~~additional deferred option gain. In addition, ~~in accordance with our policy,~~ potential royalty revenue and future option payments have not been ~~fully constrained. See also Note 10.~~

~~Long Valley Claims~~

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we sold our Long Valley unpatented mining claims located in California for consideration, net of transaction costs, of $358 which was paid at closing; a future payment of $500 one month after the start of commercial production; a future payment of $500 on or prior to the first anniversary of the start of commercial production; and a NSR on any future production from said claims at a variable rate between 0.5% and 2.0% depending on the average gold price realized~~. This NSR is fully constrained. The Company has determined that control of the Long Valley claims were transferred to the buyer at the time of sale~~recognized for accounting purposes. ~~This sale resulted in a realized gain of $358.~~

5. Plant and Equipment


	September 30, 2018						December 31, 2017						September 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
			Accumulated						Accumulated						Accumulated						Accumulated
	Cost		depreciation		Net		Cost		depreciation		Net		Cost		depreciation		Net		Cost		depreciation		Net
Mt Todd, Australia	$	5,719	$	4,830	$	889	$	5,646	$	4,591	$	1,055	$	5,237	$	5,102	$	135	$	5,197	$	5,062	$	135
Corporate, United States		333		333		—		333		333		—		333		333		—		333		333		—
Used mill equipment, Canada		6,500		—		6,500		6,500		—		6,500		5,500		—		5,500		5,500		—		5,500
	$	12,552	$	5,163	$	7,389	$	12,479	$	4,924	$	7,555	$	11,070	$	5,435	$	5,635	$	11,030	$	5,395	$	5,635

6. Common Shares

Warrants

~~Warrant~~All outstanding warrants expired unexercised in August 2019. Warrants activity is summarized in the following table:

Weighted

Weighted

average

average

Warrants

exercise price

remaining life


outstanding

per share

(yrs.)

Intrinsic value

As of December 31, 2017

6,514,625

$
1.92

1.6

$
—

As of September 30, 2018

6,514,625

$
1.92

0.9

$
—


	Weighted	Weighted
	average	average
Warrants	exercise price	remaining life
outstanding	per share	(yrs.)	Intrinsic value

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2017	6,514,625	$	1.92	1.6	$	—
As of December 31, 2018	6,514,625	$	1.92	0.6	$	—
Expired	(6,514,625)	$	1.92		$	—
As of September 30, 2019	—	$	—	—	$	—

Stock-Based Compensation

Under the Company’s stock option plan (the “Plan”), we may grant options to purchase common shares in the capital of the Company (“Common Shares”) to our directors, officers, employees and consultants. The maximum number of ~~our~~ Common Shares that may be reserved for issuance under the Plan, together with ~~RSUs~~all other stock-based compensation arrangements, which include restricted share units (“RSUs”) currently outstanding under the ~~LTIP,~~Company’s long term equity incentive plan (“LTIP”) and deferred share units (“DSUs”) issuable pursuant to the Company’s deferred share unit plan (“DSU Plan”), is a variable number equal to 10% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares on a non-diluted basis at any one time. In 2018, the Company issued phantom units to be settled in cash. Options, ~~under the Plan~~RSUs, DSUs, and phantom units are granted from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), with vesting periods and other terms as determined by the Board.

~~Table of Contents~~

Stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017		2019		2018		2019		2018
Stock options	$	107	$	8	$	307	$	32	$	29	$	107	$	160	$	307
Restricted stock units		164		245		548		648		119		164		246		548
Deferred share units										—		—		209		—
	$	271	$	253	$	855	$	680	$	148	$	271	$	615	$	855

Phantom units (Discussed below)		11		—		11		—
Phantom units									$	28	$	11	$	72	$	11

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, unrecognized compensation expense for stock options, RSUs, and phantom units ~~had unrecognized compensation expense of $223, $324,~~was $88, $463, and ~~$122~~$96, respectively, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average ~~period~~periods of ~~1.2, 0.9,~~0.8, 1.3, and ~~1.8~~1.3 years, respectively.

Stock Options

A summary of options under the Plan as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 is set forth in the following table:


										Weighted average
		Weighted average		Weighted average	Aggregate			Weighted average		remaining	Aggregate
	Number of	exercise price		remaining	intrinsic		Number of	exercise price		contractual term	intrinsic
	options	per option		contractual term	value		options	per option		(years)	value
Outstanding - December 31, 2017	1,144,500	$	0.42	1.15	$	346	1,144,500		0.42	1.15	$	346
Granted	1,142,000		0.71				1,142,000		0.71
Exercised	(40,000)		0.40				(218,600)		0.39			36
Outstanding - September 30, 2018	2,246,500	$	0.57	2.51	$	130
Cancelled/Forfeited							(748,751)		0.36			—
Outstanding - December 31, 2018							1,319,149	$	0.71	3.84	$	1
Granted							350,000		0.73
Exercised							(127,000)		0.52			29
Cancelled/Forfeited							(35,149)		0.68			3
Outstanding - September 30, 2019							1,507,000	$	0.73	3.73	$	64

Exercisable - September 30, 2018	1,240,581	$	0.52	1.71	$	94
Exercisable - September 30, 2019							992,996	$	0.73	3.64	$	44

Table of Contents

A summary of ~~our~~ unvested stock options as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 is set forth in the following table:


				Weighted				Weighted
		Weighted		average		Weighted		average
		average		remaining		average		remaining
		grant-date		amortization		grant-date		amortization
	Number of	fair value		period	Number of	fair value		period
	options	per option		(Years)	options	per option		(years)
Unvested - December 31, 2017	246,250	$	0.22	0.99	246,250		0.22	0.99
Granted	1,142,000		0.45		1,142,000		0.45
Cancelled/Forfeited					(246,250)		0.22
Vested	(382,331)		0.45		(382,331)		0.45
Unvested - September 30, 2018	1,005,919	$	0.39	1.24
Unvested - December 31, 2018					759,669	$	0.45	1.14
Granted					350,000		0.30
Cancelled/Forfeited					(35,000)		0.43
Vested					(560,665)		0.41
Unvested - September 30, 2019					514,004	$	0.40	0.78

~~No stock options were granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~ The fair value of stock options granted ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2018~~ to employees, directors and consultants was estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:



	~~2018~~
~~Expected volatility~~	~~76.2~~	%
~~Risk-free interest rate~~	~~2.7~~	%
~~Expected life (years)~~	5
~~Dividend yield~~	—
~~Forfeiture assumption~~	—	%



	2019		2018
Expected volatility	61.1	%	76.2	%
Risk-free interest rate	2.0	%	2.7	%
Expected life (years)	2.8		5.0
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%
Forfeiture assumption	0	%	0	%

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Option Amendment~~

In July 2018, the Company amended certain 2013 stock option agreements, expiring December 30, 2018 subject to the potential for a temporary extension under the terms of the Plan, for seven executives and directors (the “Option Amendment”). The amendment provides each grantee the opportunity to receive a cash buyout of certain vested, unexercised 2013 options in lieu of exercising the option to purchase shares. This cash buyout is based on the intrinsic value of each option at the time of the buyout. As a result of this modification, the Company will account for these options as awards classified as liabilities with $72 included in current liabilities. The options were previously accounted for as awards classified as equity. The Company recognized no additional compensation expense for these options in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Restricted ~~Stock~~Share Units

The following table summarizes the RSUs outstanding under the LTIP as of September 30, ~~2018:~~

2019:


		Weighted average			Weighted average
	Number	grant-date fair		Number	grant-date fair
	of RSUs	value per RSU		of RSUs	value per RSU
Unvested - December 31, 2017	1,567,907	$	0.85	1,567,907	$	0.85
Granted				319,000		0.75
Cancelled/forfeited	(246,683)		0.90	(246,683)		0.90
Vested, net of shares withheld	(637,554)		0.88	(637,554)		0.88
Unvested - December 31, 2018				1,002,670	$	0.78
Granted	319,000		0.75	1,412,500		0.49
Unvested - September 30, 2018	1,002,670	$	0.78
Cancelled/forfeited				(655,573)		0.76
Vested, net of shares withheld				(266,296)		0.84
Unvested - September 30, 2019				1,493,301	$	0.51

A portion of the RSU awards vest on a fixed future date provided the recipient continues to be affiliated with Vista on that date. Other RSU awards vest subject to certain performance and market criteria, including the accomplishment of certain corporate objectives and the Company’s share price performance. The minimum vesting period for RSUs is one year.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company withheld ~~shares~~Common Shares with an equivalent value to meet the employee withholding tax obligations which resulted from RSUs that vested in the period. Common Shares withheld are considered cancelled/forfeited.

~~New RSUs~~

Table of Contents

Deferred Share Units

In May 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved the DSU Plan. The DSU Plan provides for granting of DSUs to non-employee directors. DSUs vest immediately, however the Company will ~~not~~issue one Common Share for each DSU only after the non-employee director has ceased to be ~~granted~~a director of the Company. Additionally, in May 2019, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the LTIP such that non-employee directors are excluded from future grants under the ~~LTIP until~~LTIP. At the ~~allocation~~time the DSU Plan was approved, the Board granted 366,000 DSUs and the Company recognized $209 in DSU expense.

The following table summarizes the DSUs outstanding as of ~~such awards is duly approved by the shareholders of the Company.~~September 30, 2019:



		Weighted average
	Number of	grant-date fair
	DSUs	value per DSU
Outstanding - December 31, 2018	—	—
Granted	366,000	0.57
Outstanding - September 30, 2019	366,000	0.57

Phantom Units

Weighted average

Number of

remaining

phantom units

contractual term

Unvested - December 31, 2017

—

Granted

265,000

Unvested - September 30, 2018

265,000

1.75

~~The~~In 2018, the Company granted a total of 265,000 phantom units to certain ~~employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~employees. The value of each unit is equal to the Company’s share price on the vesting date and is payable in cash. The phantom units vest on fixed future dates provided the recipient continues to be affiliated with Vista on those dates. The ~~company will account~~Company accounts for these units as awards classified as liabilities with ~~$11~~$14 included in current liabilities as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The Company recognized ~~$11~~$28 and $72 of compensation expense for these ~~options~~phantom units in the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019, respectively.

A summary of unvested phantom units as of September 30, 2019 is set forth in the following table:


		Weighted average
		remaining
	Number of	vesting term
	phantom units	(years)
Unvested - December 31, 2017	—
Granted	265,000
Unvested - December 31, 2018	265,000	1.50
Cancelled/forfeited	(32,667)
Vested	(88,333)
Unvested - September 30, 2019	144,000	1.25

~~Table of Contents~~

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Our exploration and development activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. As such, ~~the~~ future expenditures that may be required for compliance with these laws and regulations cannot be predicted. We conduct our operations in an effort to minimize effects on the environment and believe our operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects.

Under our agreement with the Jawoyn Association Aboriginal Corporation (the “JAAC”), ~~we have agreed to offer the JAAC the opportunity to establish a joint venture with Vista holding a 90% participating interest and the JAAC holding a 10% participating interest in Mt Todd. In addition,~~ the JAAC will be entitled to an annual cash payment, or payment in kind, equal to 1% of the value of the annual gold production from the current mining licenses, and a 1% NSR on other metals, subject to a minimum payment of A$50 per year. In addition, we have agreed to offer the JAAC the opportunity to establish a joint venture with Vista holding a 90% participating interest and the JAAC holding a 10% participating interest in Mt Todd.

Table of Contents

8. Fair Value Accounting

The following table sets forth the Company’s assets measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair value at September 30, 2018


Total

Level 1

Level 3

Marketable securities

$
14

$
14

$
—

Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)

5,500

5,500

—


	Fair value at September 30, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 3
Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)	$	3,511	$	3,511	$	—


	Fair value at December 31, 2017						Fair value at December 31, 2018
	Total		Level 1		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 3
Marketable securities	$	90	$	90	$	—
Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)		3,746		3,746		—	$	5,462	$	5,462	$	—
Used mill equipment (non-recurring)		6,500		—		6,500	$	5,500	$	—	$	5,500

Our ~~marketable securities and~~ investment in Midas Gold Shares ~~are~~is classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy as ~~they are~~it is valued at quoted market prices in an active market. ~~Marketable securities are included in other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for each period presented.~~

The used mill equipment is classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as its value at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 was based on an independent third-party valuation. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, management had not identified sufficient changes in conditions to require an update to the independent third-party ~~evaluation was not deemed necessary.~~evaluation. The mill equipment is included in plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for each period presented.

There have been no transfers between levels in ~~2018,~~2019, nor have there been any changes in valuation techniques.

9. Geographic and Segment Information

The Company has one reportable operating segment. We evaluate, acquire, explore and advance gold exploration and potential development projects, which may lead to gold production or value adding strategic transactions. These activities are currently focused principally in Australia. We reported no revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. Geographic location of mineral properties and plant and equipment is provided in Notes 4 and 5, respectively.

Table of Contents

~~10.~~ ~~Subsequent Event~~

During October 2018, the Company agreed to extend the due date for the second $1,500 option payment for the Guadalupe de los Reyes project by six months to April 23, 2019. As consideration for the deferral, the Company will receive an additional $150 in cash, $50 of which was paid to the Company on October 24, 2018 and $100 of which Mineral Alamos has agreed to pay by January 23, 2019. In addition, Minera Alamos will pay interest at a rate of 1.5% per month on the unpaid balance of the $1,500 beginning January 24, 2019.

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and the related notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and information as a result of many factors. See section heading “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

All dollar amounts stated herein are in U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share and per ounce amounts and currency exchange rates unless specified otherwise. References to ~~A$ are to Australian currency and to~~ $ are to United States ~~currency.~~dollars and to A$ are to Australian dollars.

Overview

Vista Gold Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Vista,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) operate in the gold mining industry. We are focused on the evaluation, acquisition, exploration and advancement of gold exploration and potential development projects, which may lead to gold production or value adding strategic transactions such as earn-in right agreements, option agreements, leases to third parties, joint venture arrangements with other mining companies, or outright sales of assets for cash and/or other consideration. We ~~look for opportunities~~undertake programs designed to improve the value of our gold projects through exploration drilling and/or technical studies focused on optimizing previous engineering work. We do not currently generate cash flows from mining operations.

The Company’s flagship asset is its 100% owned Mt Todd gold project (“Mt Todd” or the “Project”) in the Northern Territory (“NT”) Australia. Mt Todd is the largest undeveloped gold project in Australia. The Company has invested substantial amounts to evaluate, engineer, permit and de-risk the Project, and we believe these efforts have added to the underlying value of the Project. In January 2018, the Company received authorization for the last major environmental permit for Mt Todd and we announced the positive results of ~~the~~an updated ~~PFS~~preliminary feasibility study for Mt ~~Todd. See “Project Updates” below for a summary of the PFS results.~~Todd (the “2018 PFS”). Subsequently, ~~Vista has completed~~we announced additional metallurgical testing ~~including ongoing~~results that demonstrated improved gold recovery compared to the 2018 PFS. These results and other findings were incorporated into a preliminary feasibility study, which was announced in September 2019 (the “2019 PFS”). The 2019 PFS successfully confirmed the efficiency of ore sorting across a broad range of head grades, the natural concentration of gold in the screen undersize material prior to sorting, the economics of fine grinding ~~evaluations, which demonstrate further improvements~~and the resulting improved gold recoveries, and the selection of FLSmidth's VXP mill as the preferred fine grinding mill.

As of September 30, 2019, the Company also holds 7.8 million common shares in ~~gold recovery. With these important milestones~~the capital of Midas Gold Corp. (“Midas Gold Shares”), a non-core project in Mexico subject to a third-party option agreement, and ~~subsequent project improvements complete, Vista is~~royalty interests in ~~a better position to identify~~the United States and ~~pursue those strategic alternatives that may provide the best opportunity for shareholders to realize fair value for Mt Todd.~~ Indonesia.

Results from Operations

Summary

Consolidated net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2,498 and ~~2017 was~~ $2,062 ~~and $2,655~~ or $0.02 and ~~$0.03~~$0.02 per share, respectively. Consolidated net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was $8,194 and ~~2017 was~~ $4,933 or $0.08 and ~~$8,184 or~~ $0.05 ~~and $0.08~~ per share, respectively. The principal components of these year-over-year changes are discussed below.

The Company had $7,179 of working capital and no debt as of September 30, 2019.

Table of Contents

Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs

Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs were ~~$960~~$1,401 and ~~$1,635~~$960 during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and ~~2017, respectively,~~$3,294 and $3,560 ~~and $4,695~~ for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. These costs are predominantly project holding and discretionary costs associated with Mt ~~Todd and are comprised of fixed costs and discretionary costs.~~Todd. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 and 2017, our fixed~~2019, project holding costs (which ~~include cash expenditures~~are necessary to ~~ensure that we~~ preserve our property rights and meet ~~all of~~ our safety, regulatory, social, and environmental responsibilities) ~~trended approximately 20% higher in 2018~~were lower compared to the same periods during 2018 as water discharge from the Batman pit decreased because of comparatively lower precipitation during the most recent wet season. This also reduced the scope of certain baseline monitoring activities. In addition, the Australian dollar was approximately 8% weaker versus the United States dollar in 2019 compared to 2018. For the three months ended September 30, 2019, project holding costs were higher than the same period in ~~2017 as baseline monitoring activities have been introduced as part of our compliance with~~2018 due to the ~~terms of~~costs to complete the permit granted under the Australian Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act of 1999 (“EPBC”) in January 2018. In addition, we have added site employees to complement site environmental, maintenance and exploration activities. We expect 2018 fixed

~~Table of Contents~~

~~costs, in Australian dollar terms, to continue to trend 20% to 25% (approximately A$650 to A$800) higher than 2017 fixed costs.~~2019 PFS.

~~The magnitude of discretionary program spending~~Discretionary costs during the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 was~~2019 were also lower than the ~~discretionary program spending~~same periods during 2018.

Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 included non-cash stock-based compensation of $58 and $67, respectively; and $120 and $219 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017. The principal~~2019 and 2018, program was the drilling of four additional PQ core holes designed to extract approximately 6 tonnes of higher-grade material from the Batman pit, for the completion of two additional 2.5 tonne bulk HPGR crushing, XRT and laser sorting tests using the same equipment as previous test work; and a single 1 tonne sample for completing an HPGR test with a competing HPGR manufacturer. The two 2.5 tonne tests were conducted to confirm the efficiency of sorting higher-grade ores and to develop feasibility-level data demonstrating the relationship between grind size and recovery over a wide range of sample head grades. The material 2017 discretionary programs included: the completion of the drilling program to generate the 20 tonne sample used in the ore sorting testing program; the ore sorting testing program and subsequent metallurgical studies including grinding studies to confirm the potential for improved gold recoveries and preparation of the draft mine management plan. Based on these studies, the Company completed the PFS, the results of which were announced during the first quarter of 2018. See “Project Updates” below for a summary of the PFS results. We expect 2018 discretionary costs, in Australian dollar terms, to be 45% to 50% (approximately A$2,000 to A$2,250) lower than 2017 discretionary costs.respectively.

Corporate administration

Corporate administration costs were ~~$969~~$865 and ~~$823~~$969 during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and ~~2017, respectively,~~$3,079 and $3,280 ~~and $2,619 for~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. ~~Higher 2018 fixed costs~~Administrative expenses were incurred principally as a result of the completion of the Mt Todd PFS update, which affected investor relations, regulatory and compensation costs. In addition, insurance coverage was increased in 2018, resulting in higher 2018 insurance costs. We expect 2018 fixed costs to trend approximately 15% - 20% (approximately $450 to $600) higher than 2017 fixed costs.

~~Gain on disposal of mineral property~~

~~Long Valley claims~~

~~During~~lower during the three months ended ~~March 31, 2017, we sold our Long Valley unpatented mining claims located in California for consideration, net of transaction costs, of $358 which was paid at closing; a future payment of $500~~ ~~one month after the start of commercial production; a future payment of $500 on or prior~~September 30, 2019 compared to the ~~first anniversary~~same period in 2018 because of cost savings related to bringing certain investor relations costs in house that were previously outsourced.

Depreciation

Depreciation costs were $14 and $12 during the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively; and $40 and $252 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The majority of the start of commercial production; and a net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) on any future production from said claims at a variable rate between 0.5% and 2.0% depending on the average gold price realized. ~~This sale resulted~~Company’s fixed assets were fully depreciated by December 31, 2018, resulting in ~~a realized gain of $358.~~lower 2019 depreciation costs.

Non-operating income and expenses

Gain/~~(loss)~~(Loss) on other investments

Gain/~~(loss)~~(Loss) on other investments was ~~$(274)~~$(234) and ~~$(78)~~$(274) for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively and ~~$1,754~~$(1,951) and ~~$(858)~~$1,754 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. These amounts ~~are the~~ result offrom changes in fair value of ~~the common shares we hold in~~our Midas Gold ~~Corp. (“Midas Gold Shares”).~~ Shares.

Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities was ~~$6,347~~$5,190 and ~~$6,067~~$6,347 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. The ~~increased~~decreased use of cash in ~~2018 was driven mainly by the~~2019 resulted from $1,165 less cash used for working capital items, most notably being a $1,178 reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities during the first ~~quarter. Relatively high discretionary program activity and completion~~nine months of 2018, after which the ~~Mt Todd PFS, in particular, resulted in higher than normal accounts payable at the end of 2017.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Company carried consistently lower balances.

Investing activities

Net cash ofprovided by investing activities was $5,513 and $6,185 ~~and $5,675~~ for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively, was provided primarily by the disposition~~respectively. Disposition of short-term investments, net of ~~acquisitions.~~acquisitions, decreased during 2019 by $2,229

Table of Contents

compared to the same period in 2018. This reduction in net dispositions of short-term investments was possible because cash requirements for operations were lower and other sources of cash were available to us, notably the $1,667 received from Minera Alamos de Sonora S.A. de C.V. (“Minera Alamos”) under the terms of the Guadalupe de los Reyes Option Agreement (as defined below).

Financing activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, cash of $10 and $106, respectively, was used in financing activities. These amounts result from uses of cash for payment of employee withholding tax obligations arising from the vesting of RSUs, in lieu of issuing common shares of the Company, ~~on vesting of RSUs, cash of $122 was used for the payment of related employee withholding tax obligations. $16 was~~offset by proceeds received from ~~the~~ exercise of stock options.

~~Net cash of $264 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was utilized for the payment of certain employee withholding tax obligations in lieu of the issuance of common shares.~~

Liquidity and capital resources

Our cash and short-term investments as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 decreased to ~~$10,192~~$4,495 from ~~$16,575~~$8,068 at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 due mainly to expenditures for operating activities, ~~and~~offset partially by cash received from Minera Alamos under the ~~reduction~~terms of ~~payables.~~ the Guadalupe de los Reyes Option Agreement. Our net working capital decreased to ~~$14,967~~$7,179 at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 from ~~$19,057~~$13,198 at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 due mainly to the decrease in cash and short-term investments to fund operating activities ~~partially offset by an increase~~and the reduction in ~~the market~~fair value of our Midas Gold ~~Shares.~~Shares, offset partially by receipts from Minera Alamos.

We believe ~~that~~ our existing working capital, ~~together with potential future sources~~comprised mostly of ~~non-dilutive financing,~~cash, short-term investments, and our Midas Gold Shares, will be sufficient to fully fund our currently planned ~~fixed~~corporate and project holding costs and discretionary programs ~~into 2020.~~ for more than 12 months.

~~Potential~~Vista has other potential future sources of non-dilutive financing that may be converted to additional working capital. These sources include the sale of non-core assets such as our used mill equipment, ~~and~~ future option payments ~~for~~under the Guadalupe de los Reyes ~~gold/silver project;~~Option Agreement, and ~~depending~~monetization of royalty interests held by the Company. The Company plans to increase its focus on ~~market conditions,~~monetizing these other sources of working capital as existing working capital decreases.

In addition to the ~~sale~~existing working capital and other potential sources of ~~some~~non-dilutive financing highlighted above, the Company has an at-the-market offering agreement (the “ATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”) to provide additional balance sheet flexibility at a low cost. Under the ATM Agreement the Company may, but is not obligated to, issue and sell common shares in the capital of the Company through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $10,000. The ATM Agreement will remain in full force and effect, subject to an effective registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, until the earlier of August 31, 2020, or ~~all of our remaining Midas Gold Shares.~~the date that the ATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with the terms therein.

The ~~continuing~~ long-term viability of ~~the Company~~Vista is dependent upon our ability to maintain our low expenditure profile, realize value from non-dilutive assets and, if necessary, issue additional equity to secure sufficient funding to advance significant value-adding programs that will focus on generating future cash flows and ~~ultimately~~positive equity returns to ~~generate future profits from operations or sales of assets.~~our shareholders. The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as mineral properties and plant and equipment in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are dependent on our ability to ~~fund exploration~~attract sufficient capital resources to execute our strategy and ~~development activities that could lead~~the ultimate success of our programs to ~~profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of these assets.~~enhance value, most importantly at Mt Todd.

Fair Value Accounting

Fair value at September 30, 2018


Total

Level 1

Level 3

Marketable securities

$
14

$
14

$
—

Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)

5,500

5,500

—


	Fair value at September 30, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 3
Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)	$	3,511	$	3,511	$	—

Fair value at December 31, 2017


Total

Level 1

Level 3

Marketable securities

$
90

$
90

$
—

Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)

3,746

3,746

—

Used mill equipment (non-recurring)

6,500

—

6,500

1716

Table of Contents

	Fair value at December 31, 2018
	Total		Level 1		Level 3
Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)	$	5,462	$	5,462	$	—
Used mill equipment (non-recurring)	$	5,500	$	—	$	5,500

The used mill equipment is classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy as its value at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 was based on an independent third-party valuation. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, management had not identified sufficient changes in conditions to require an update to the independent third-party ~~evaluation was not deemed necessary.~~evaluation. The used mill equipment is included in plant and equipment on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for each period presented.

There have been no transfers between levels in ~~2018,~~2019, nor have there been any changes in valuation techniques.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

We have no material contractual obligations as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Project Updates

Mt Todd Gold Project, Northern Territory, Australia

The following scientific and technical information about Mt Todd has been reviewed and approved by Mr. John Rozelle, Senior Vice President of Vista. Mr. Rozelle is a qualified person as defined by Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects(“NI 43-101”).

Environmental Approvals and Metallurgical Optimization Program

In January 2018, we announced that the “authorization of a controlled activity” at Mt Todd, as required under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act, as it relates to the Gouldian Finch, had been approved by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy. With this authorization, Vista has all major environmental approvals necessary to allow development of Mt Todd.

Vista initiated a second metallurgical optimization program following issuance of the 2018 PFS. The objective of this program was to determine overall gold recoveries at finer grind sizes and evaluate the efficiency of the FLSmidth VXP mills as opposed to the Glencore ISA mills, which were contemplated in the 2018 PFS. As a result of this test work and related leach recovery tests, a final grind size of 80% passing 40 microns (µm) was selected.The outcomes of our metallurgical testing and other findings were incorporated into an updated PFS (see 2019 PFS, below), which was issued in October 2019.

In ~~January~~support of the metallurgical test work, we completed four additional large diameter core holes and extracted approximately 6 tonnes of higher-grade material from the Batman deposit. We prepared two additional 2.5 tonne composite samples for high-pressure grinding roll (“HPGR”) crushing and sorting tests using the same equipment as previous test work. The two 2.5 tonne tests were prepared to confirm the efficiency of sorting higher-grade ores. Additional feasibility-study-level grinding tests with manufacturers of fine grinding mills were completed in order to obtain material for further metallurgical studies and specific operating data for future design and evaluation work. We also completed additional testing with an impeller manufacturer in order to achieve optimal efficiency at designed slurry densities and P80 product particle size.

Table of Contents

In August 2019, we announced the results of the 2019 fine grinding tests completed on samples of various grade ranges, under the direction of Resource Development Inc. These tests confirm that the Mt Todd ore can be efficiently ground to a finer final product size with lower power consumption in the grinding circuit than estimated in the 2018 PFS. Leaching the finer final product size material reconfirmed higher recoveries at finer grind sizes. It also demonstrated that at 40µm grind size, the tail grade is nearly constant, with minor changes easily definable within specific head-grade ranges.

Vista’s latest metallurgic test programs have confirmed: (1) the efficiency of ore sorting across a broad range of head grades and the natural concentration of gold in the screen undersize material prior to sorting; (2) the efficiency of fine grinding and improved gold leach recoveries at an 80% passing grind size of 40 microns; and (3) the selection of FLSmidth VXP mill as the preferred fine-grinding mill.

2019 PFS

In September 2019, we announced the results of an updated preliminary feasibility study ~~(the “PFS”)~~ for the Mt Todd project and in October 2019 we filed a technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Mt Todd Gold Project 50,000 tpd Preliminary Feasibility Study Northern Territory, Australia” with an effective date of September 10, 2019 and an issue date of October 7, 2019 (the ~~“Project”~~“2019 PFS”). The 2019 PFS iswas based on the results of metallurgical testing, a comprehensive review of the Project and the re-design of elements of the process flow sheet, ~~incorporating automated sorting~~ and most importantly, grinding circuit design changes. Key inputs that changed in the 2019 PFS include higher gold recoveries due to the finer grind size, a higher gold price, and improved foreign exchange rates.

The process improvement efforts ~~have~~ resulted in revised estimates that reflect reduced operating costs, increased gold recovery and higher gold ~~production at~~production. In addition, we commissioned an independent benchmarking study to assess the appropriateness of capital and operating cost estimates, construction and ramp-up schedules, owner's costs and key components of the Mt ~~Todd. Management believes that~~Todd project. Recommendations from the ~~design changes have resulted~~study were incorporated, as appropriate, in ~~significantly improved Project economics compared to~~ the ~~previous preliminary feasibility study, at a $1,300/oz gold price.~~2019 PFS. We also updated revenue, capital, and operating costs based on current market conditions and recent quotes from suppliers.

The 2019 PFS evaluates two development scenarios: a 50,000 tpd project that develops more of the Mt Todd resource and generates a larger ~~Net Present Value~~net present value (“NPV”) (the “Base Case”); and a smaller and higher-grade 33,000 tpd project (the “Alternate Case”). The Alternate Case of the 2019 PFS supersedes a similar study in the 2018 PFS, but is not deemed material. The Alternate Case is disclosed in the full technical report referenced below.

Highlights of the 2019 PFS Base Case are presented in the table below:


@ $1,300/oz Au	Years 1-5			Life of Mine (13 years)
								Years 1-5			Life of Mine (13 years)
Average Milled Grade (g Au/t)		0.98				0.82			0.96				0.82
Payable Gold Annual Average (000's ozs)		479				382			495				413
Payable Gold Total (000's ozs)		2,397				4,956			2,476				5,305
Gold Recovery		86.4	%			85.8	%		92.3	%			91.9	%
Cash Costs ($/oz)	$	571			$	645		$	575			$	645
AISC ($/oz)								$	688			$	746
Strip Ratio (waste:ore)		2.8				2.5			2.65				2.52
Initial Capital ($ millions)					$	839						$	826
Pre-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)					$	1,178						$	1,440
After-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)					$	679						$	823
IRR (Pre-tax/After-tax)						27.3 / 20.5	%						30.4 / 23.4	%
After-tax Payback (Production Years)						3.2							2.9

~~Table of Contents~~

Note: Economics presented using ~~$1,300/~~$1,350/oz gold and a flat ~~$0.80 USD~~$0.70 : ~~$1.00 AUD~~A$1.00 exchange rate and assumes deferral of certain Northern Territory tax obligations as well as realization of equipment salvage values at the end of the mine life. Cash Costs per ounce and All-in Sustaining Costs (“AISC”) per ounce are non-GAAP financial measures; see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for additional disclosure.

Table of Contents

The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the Base Case after-tax economics to variable gold prices and foreign exchange assumptions:

Foreign
Exchange
(US$/AUD)
Gold Price
$1,100
$1,200
$1,300
$1,400
$1,500
IRR
NPV₅

IRR
NPV₅

IRR
NPV₅

IRR
NPV₅

IRR
NPV₅

0.70
15.9%
$439
20.5%*
$632*
24.9%
$825
29.1%
$1,016
33.2%
$1,208
0.75
13.8%
$366
18.3%
$559
22.6%
$752
26.8%
$944
30.8%
$1,136
0.80
11.9%
$292
16.3%
$486
20.5%†
$679†
24.6%
$872
28.6%
$1,063
0.85
10.1%
$222
14.3%
$412
18.5%
$606
22.5%
$799
26.4%
$991
0.90
8.3%
$150
12.5%
$339
16.6%
$532
20.6%
$726
24.4%
$918
* Approximate current conditions †Assumptions used in the PFS

Foreign Exchange ($/A$)	Gold Price
	$1,200		$1,300		$1,350		$1,400		$1,500
	IRR	NPV_5%	IRR	NPV_5%	IRR	NPV_5%	IRR	NPV_5%	IRR	NPV_5%
0.60	21.6%	$687	26.3%	$895	28.4%	$994	30.5%	$ 1,094	34.7%	$ 1,296
0.65	19.2%	$604	23.7%	$807	25.8%	$911	27.9%	$ 1,011	32.0%	$ 1,209
0.70	16.9%	$525	21.2%	$718	23.4%	$823	25.4%	$ 928	29.4%	$ 1,126
0.75	14.7%	$440	18.9%	$636	20.9%	$734	23.1%	$ 839	27.0%	$ 1,043
0.80	12.6%	$355	16.8%	$557	18.8%	$652	20.7%	$ 750	24.7%	$ 954

Note: Changes in foreign exchange rates are only applied to operating costs and not applied to either initial or sustaining capital costs.

~~Highlights~~Key capital expenditures for Base Case initial and sustaining capital requirements are:


Capital Expenditures ($ Millions, except per ounce amount)	Initial		Sustaining
	Capital		Capital
Mining	$	121	$	406
Process Plant		367		17
Project Services		109		72
Project Infrastructure		26		—
Site Establishment & Early Works		18		—
Management, Engineering, EPCM Services		82		—
Preproduction Costs		16		—
Contingency		87		40
Sub-Total	$	826	$	536
Asset Sale and Salvage		—		(140)
Total Capital	$	826	$	397	(1)
Total Capital per payable ounce of gold	$	156	$	75	(1)

Notes: may not add due to rounding.

(1) Net of asset sales.

The following table presents a breakdown of Base Case operating costs.


Operating Cost	First 5 Years				Life of Mine Cost
	Per tonne				Per tonne
	processed		Per ounce		processed		Per ounce
Mining	$	6.51	$	234	$	6.02	$	251
Processing		7.82		281		7.88		328
Site General and Administrative		1.07		39		1.11		46
Jawoyn Royalty		0.38		14		0.32		14
Water Treatment		0.07		2		0.08		4
Tailings Management		0.08		3		0.07		3
Refining Costs		0.09		3		0.08		3
Power Credit		—		—		(0.10)		(4)
Total Cash Costs	$	16.01	$	575	$	15.48	$	645

Note: Jawoyn Royalty and refinery costs calculated at $1,350 per ounce gold. May not add due to rounding. Total Cash Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure; see the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for additional disclosure.

The mine plan contemplates 221.0 million tonnes of ore containing an estimated 5.85 million ounces of gold at an average grade of 0.82 g Au/t to be processed over the 13-year operating life of the ~~PFS Alternate Case are presented~~Project. Total recovered gold is expected to be 5.3 million ounces. Average annual gold production over the life of the Project is expected to be 413,400

Table of Contents

ounces, averaging 495,100 ounces during the first five years of commercial operations, with 608,600 ounces produced in the first year of commercial operation. Commercial production is anticipated to begin after two years of construction and six months of commissioning and ramp-up.

The table ~~below:~~below highlights the 2019 PFS Base Case production schedule.

@ $1,300/oz Au

Years 1-5

Life of Mine (11 years)
Average Milled Grade (g Au/t)

0.95

0.90

Payable Gold Annual Average (000's ozs)

302

273

Payable Gold Total (000's ozs)

1,509

3,003

Gold Recovery

86.4
%

85.5
%
Cash Costs ($/oz)

$
581

$
593

Strip Ratio (waste:ore)

1.7

1.7

Initial Capital ($ millions)

$
641

Pre-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)

$
722

After-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)

$
418

IRR (Pre-tax/After-tax)

23.4 / 17.8
%
After-tax Payback (Production Years)

3.6



					Feed	Contained	Mill
	Ore Mined	Waste	Strip Ratio	Milled Ore	Grade (g	Ounces	Production
Years	(kt)	mined (kt)	(W:O)	(kt)	Au/t	(kozs)	(kozs)
(1)	2,859	8,802	3.08	—	—	—	—
1	16,138	10,498	0.65	12,461	1.17	469	430
2	15,613	47,536	3.04	17,750	0.85	482	438
3	24,495	32,880	1.34	17,799	1.04	593	541
4	15,586	76,531	4.91	17,750	0.70	399	360
5	29,852	58,085	1.95	17,750	1.10	629	574
6	8,984	87,011	9.69	17,750	0.78	446	404
7	7,178	68,218	9.50	17,799	0.52	298	264
8	13,482	56,598	4.20	15,129	0.61	297	266
9	18,750	42,935	2.29	17,750	0.70	397	358
10	28,653	29,747	1.04	17,750	0.93	528	481
11	25,970	4,148	0.16	17,799	1.18	674	618
12	127	—	—	17,750	0.65	371	334
13	—	—	—	15,805	0.52	265	237
Total	207,687	522,990	2.52	221,041	0.82	5,848	5,305

Note: Economics presented using $1,300/oz gold and a flat $0.80 USD : $1.00 AUD exchange rate and assumes deferral of certain Northern Territory tax obligations as well as realization of equipment salvage valuesMay not add due to rounding. Total milled ore includes material from the heap leach pad that is planned to be processed at the end of the mine life.

The 2019 PFS estimated total recovered gold at 5.3 million ounces. The table below presents the estimated mineral reserves for the Project.

Mt. Todd Gold Project Mineral Reserves – 50,000 tpd, 0.40 g Au/t cut-off and $1,250 per ounce gold


	Batman Deposit			Heap Leach Pad			Total
	Tonnes	Grade	Contained	Tonnes	Grade	Contained	Tonnes	Grade	Contained
	(000s)	(gAu/t)	Ounces	(000s)	(g Au/t)	Ounces	(000s)	(g Au/t)	Ounces
Proven	72,672	0.88	2,057	—	—	—	72,672	0.88	2,057
Probable	135,015	0.82	3,559	13,354	0.54	232	148,369	0.79	3,791
Proven & Probable	207,687	0.84	5,616	13,354	0.54	232	221,041	0.82	5,848

Economic analysis conducted only on proven and probable mineral reserves. Thomas Dyer of Mine Development Associates is the Qualified Person responsible for developing mineral reserves for the Batman deposit. Dr. Deepak Malhotra of Resource Development Inc. is the Qualified Person responsible for the metallurgical data and program, and for developing mineral reserves for the heap leach. These reserves are not reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards.

For additional information on Mt Todd, see our technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Mt Todd Gold Project 50,000 tpd Preliminary Feasibility Study Northern Territory, Australia” with an effective date of ~~January 24, 2018~~September 10, 2019 and an issue date of ~~March 2, 2018.~~October 7, 2019, which is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, EDGAR at www.sec.gov, as well as on Vista's website under "Mt Todd – Technical Reports." See Cautionary Note to Investors regarding Estimates of Mineral Reserves and Resources below. The technical report is referenced for informational purposes only and is not incorporated herein by reference.

~~Also in January 2018, we announced that the “authorization of a controlled activity” at~~The Company intends to continue to de-risk Mt Todd ~~as required under~~in a cost effective manner while it seeks to secure a development partner. The 2019 PFS provides a solid basis for engagement with prospective development partners who management believe will recognize the EPBC, as it relates to the Gouldian Finch, has been approved by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Environment and Energy. With this authorization, Vista has all the major environmental approvals necessary to allow developmentvalue of Mt ~~Todd.~~Todd and provide appropriate reward for Vista shareholders.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we completed four additional PQ core holes designed to extract approximately 6 tonnes of higher-grade material from the Batman pit, for the completion of two additional 2.5 tonne bulk HPGR crushing, XRT and laser sorting tests using the same equipment as previous test work; and a single 1 tonne sample for completing an HPGR test with a competing HPGR manufacturer. The two 2.5 tonne tests were conducted to confirm the efficiency of sorting higher-grade ores. We are completing additional feasibility-study-level grinding tests with the manufacturers of the secondary grinding mills in order to obtain material for ongoing metallurgical studies andMt Todd is without known mineral reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7.

1920

Table of Contents

specific operating data for future design and evaluation work. Similar tests on low-grade samples were conducted earlier this year with Glencore, who manufacture the ISAMill referenced in the PFS, and with FLSmidth, who produce a competing mill known as a Vertimill. We have also completed additional testing with an impeller manufacturer in order to optimize the design of the leach tanks to achieve the lowest possible electrical power consumption at designed slurry densities.

In August 2018, we completed tests of the second stage grinding circuit undertaken, under the direction of Resource Development Inc. These tests suggest that the Mt Todd ore can be efficiently ground to a finer final product size with lower power consumption than estimated in the PFS. Leaching the finer final product size material has again confirmed higher recoveries at finer grind sizes. Based on these initial results, we are now undertaking additional testing to: confirm results over a broad range of feed grades, justify design changes and support a possible update of the project economics. We believe that the results of these ongoing grinding and leaching tests indicate that gold recoveries exceeding 90% may be achieved for the Mt Todd gold project, as compared to 86.4% assumed in our January 2018 PFS. Analysis indicates that each 1% improvement in gold recoveries could add approximately 0.5% to Mt Todd’s after-tax IRR, and approximately $25 million to after-tax NPV₅.

We are undertaking additional definition drilling at Quigleys, intended to investigate the possibility of providing the mill with future supplemental higher-grade ore. We are also undertaking exploration programs on the Mt Todd exploration licenses (each, an “EL”), designed to continue investigating some of the known geophysical and geochemical anomalies.

Guadalupe de los Reyes Gold/Silver Project, Sinaloa, Mexico

During October 2017, we entered into an agreement (the “Option Agreement”) to option our interest in the Guadalupe de los Reyes gold and silver project in Sinaloa, Mexico ~~(the “GdlR Project”~~(“Los Reyes”) to Minera Alamos Inc. and its subsidiary Minera Alamos. In June 2019, the Option Agreement was assigned from Minera Alamos ~~de Sonora S.A. de C.V.~~to ePower Metals Inc. by way of assignment agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”), with our consent. ePower Metals Inc., subsequently changed its name to Prime Mining Corporation (“Prime Mining”). The Assignment Agreement provides that in certain circumstances, the rights under the Option Agreement will revert from Prime Mining to Minera ~~Alamos”).~~

Alamos.

Pursuant to the terms of the Option Agreement and the Assignment Agreement, we ~~have~~ granted Minera Alamos or Prime Mining, as applicable, (the “Optionholder”) an exclusive right and option right to earn a 100% interest in the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project by:

maintaining the concessions comprising the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project in good standing;

fulfilling all ~~of our~~ obligations to the Ejido La Tasajera (the “Ejido”) as set out in the temporary occupation contract between us and the Ejido;

granting us a capped ~~NSR~~net smelter return royalty (“NSR”) on production from open pit mining (the ~~“Open-Pit~~“Open Pit NSR”) at rates that range from 1% (at gold prices of $1,400/oz or less) to a maximum of 2% (at gold prices above $1,600/oz) up to an aggregate of $2,000 in royalty payments;

granting us the right to assume a 49% non-carried interest in an underground project if ~~Minera Alamos~~Optionholder decides to develop an underground mine at the ~~GdlR Project~~Los Reyes project (the “Back-in Right”).

The Option Agreement provides that all cash payments are non-refundable and optional to ~~Minera Alamos,~~the Optionholder, and in the event ~~Minera Alamos~~the GdlR Optionholder fails to pay any of the required amounts as set out in the Option Agreement, or fails to comply with its other obligations, the Option Agreement will terminate and ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder will have no interest in the ~~GdlR Project.~~Los Reyes project. Provided it is not in breach of the Option Agreement, ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder may, at its discretion, ~~advance~~accelerate the above payment schedule.

~~Table of Contents~~

S.A. de C.V., the entity which owns the ~~GdlR Project,~~Los Reyes project, to ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder and the Open-Pit NSR and Underground NSR will be granted to us.

Table of Contents

Mining in October 2019. This receipt will be recorded as additional deferred option gain. In addition, potential royalty revenue and future option payments have not been recognized as income for accounting purposes.

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

Vista has been a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) as defined under Section 1297 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, in recent years and expects to continue to be a PFIC in the future. Current and prospective United States shareholders should consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of PFIC classification and the U.S. federal tax treatment of PFICs. Additional information on this matter is included in Vista’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, under “Part II. Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities — Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents.”

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information under Canadian securities laws that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such legislation. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities commissions and in press releases and public statements by our officers or representatives that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, including, but not limited to, such things as those listed below:

Operations

~~our~~Our belief that process improvements reflected in the 2019 PFS will result in reduced operating costs, increased gold recovery, and higher gold production realized at Mt ~~Todd is the largest undeveloped gold project in Australia;~~Todd;

our belief that the results of the ~~current~~2019 PFS demonstrate a technically sound project with ~~solid~~robust economics at ~~$1,300/oz gold;~~currently assumed gold prices;

our belief that ore sorting, grinding and process flow sheet improvements at Mt Todd, together with the resultant gold recovery increases and processing cost reductions can be achieved economically and reliably;

our plans and available funding to continue to identify and study potential Mt Todd optimizations, project improvements and efficiencies;

~~our expectation that our fixed costs will be higher~~estimates of future operating and ~~our discretionary costs will be lower in 2018 than in 2017;~~financial performance;

our plans to ~~identify and pursue~~advance work at Mt Todd to take advantage of our strategic ~~alternatives that may provide the best opportunity for shareholders to realize fair value for Mt Todd;~~

~~the feasibility of Mt Todd;~~position;

our ~~belief that selectively screening~~expectation of Mt Todd’s impact, including environmental and ~~rejecting sub-economic material will improve gold recoveries and lower process operating costs at Mt Todd;~~economic impacts;

our ~~belief that these design changes can be implemented without materially changing the Project’s capital requirements;~~

~~our belief that design changes have resulted in significantly improved Project economics compared to the previous preliminary feasibility study;~~

~~our belief~~expectation that the ~~Mt Todd ore can~~Mine Management Plan will be ~~ground to a finer final product size with lower power consumption than previously estimated;~~

~~our belief that gold recoveries at Mt Todd could exceed 90%;~~

~~Table of Contents~~

approved by ~~Our belief that each 1% improvement in gold recoveries could add approximately 0.5% to Mt Todd’s after-tax IRR,~~the Northern Territory Department of Primary Industries and ~~approximately $25 million to after-tax NPV~~₅.Resources;

~~our belief~~ plans and estimates concerning potential project development, including the use of HPGR crushers and access to a water supply, as well as the ability to obtain all required permits;

that weprospective development partners will ~~complete additional definition drilling at Quigleys~~recognize the value of Mt Todd and ~~exploration programs on the ELs in 2018;~~provide appropriate reward for Vista shareholders;

estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources;

our intention to ~~investigate~~improve the ~~possibility~~value of ~~providing the mill with future supplemental higher-grade ore from Quigleys;~~our gold projects;

the potential that development projects may lead to gold production or value adding strategic transactions;

the timing, performance and results of feasibility studies;

Table of Contents

Business and Industry

our belief that our existing working capital, coupled with potential future sources of non-dilutive financing will be sufficient to fully fund our currently planned ~~fixed~~corporate and project holding costs and discretionary programs ~~into 2020;~~for more than 12 months and that the Company will increase its focus on monetizing these other sources of working capital as existing working capital decreases;;

our belief that we are in a position to actively pursue strategic alternatives that provide the best opportunity to maximize value for the Company;

our belief that the At-the-Market program will provide additional financing flexibility at a low ~~cost, if accessed;~~cost;

the potential monetization of our non-core assets, including our mill equipment which is for sale, and our Midas Gold ~~Shares will realize fair values;~~

~~estimates of future operating and financial performance;~~Shares;

potential funding requirements and sources of capital, including near-term sources of additional cash;

our expectation that the Company will continue to incur losses and will not pay dividends for the foreseeable future;

~~the timing, performance and results of feasibility studies;~~

our potential entry into agreements to find, lease, purchase, option or sell mineral interests;

~~our estimation of Mt Todd’s environmental and economic impacts;~~

plans and estimates concerning potential project development, including the use of high pressure grinding roll crushers and access to a water supply, as well as the ability to obtain all required permits;

our belief that we are in compliance in all material respects with applicable laws and regulations including applicable mining, health, safety and environmental statutes and regulations in all of the jurisdictions in which we operate;

~~our belief that we maintain reasonable amounts of insurance;~~

~~estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources;~~

~~our intention to improve the value of our gold projects and our expectation that the selected discretionary programs will add value to Mt Todd;~~

~~our belief that future exploration and development activities could lead to profitable production or proceeds from the sale of assets;~~

potential changes in regulations or taxation initiatives;

our expectation that we will continue to be a ~~PFIC;~~passive foreign investment company;

the ~~possibility~~expected impact of the adoption of new accounting standards on our financial statements;

the potential that we may grant options and/or other stock-based awards to our directors, officers, employees and consultants;

~~the possibility that future expenditures may be required for compliance with various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment;~~

~~the possibility that development projects may lead to gold production or value adding strategic transactions;~~

our belief that ~~Minera Alamos~~the Optionholder will have no legal interest in the Guadalupe de los Reyes gold/silver project if the Option Agreement ~~is terminated;~~terminates;

~~the possibility~~our belief that we will receive any future payments and that we will be granted the Open-Pit NSR and the Underground NSR pursuant to the terms of the ~~Guadalupe de los Reyes gold/silver project~~ Option Agreement;

~~Table of Contents~~

our belief that if we exercise the ~~Guadalupe de los Reyes gold/silver project~~ Back-in Right we will enter into a joint venture agreement on acceptable terms, if at all; and

~~preliminary estimates~~the potential that future expenditures may be required for compliance with various laws and regulations governing the protection of the ~~reclamation and other related costs associated with certain mining claims in British Columbia.~~environment.

Table of Contents

Forward-looking statements and forward-looking information have been based upon our current business and operating plans, as approved by the Company’s Board of Directors; our cash and other funding requirements and timing and sources thereof; results of pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, mineral resource and reserve estimates, preliminary economic assessments and exploration activities; advancements of the Company’s required permitting processes; our experience working with our regulators; current market conditions and project development plans. The words “estimate,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “believe,” “will,” “may” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. These factors include risks such as:

Operating Risks

pre-feasibility and feasibility study results and preliminary assessment results and the accuracy of estimates and assumptions on which they are based;

resource and reserve estimate results, the accuracy of such estimates and the accuracy of sampling and subsequent assays and geologic interpretations on which they are based;

technical and operational feasibility and the economic viability of deposits;

our ability to obtain, renew or maintain the necessary authorizations and permits for Mt Todd, including its development plans and operating activities;

the timing and results of a feasibility study ~~and the timing~~on Mt Todd;

market conditions supporting a decision to develop Mt Todd;

delays in commencement of ~~the potential development of~~construction at Mt Todd;

increased costs that affect our operations or our financial condition;

our reliance on third parties to fulfill their obligations under agreements with us;

whether projects not managed by us will comply with our standards or meet our objectives;

~~a shortage of skilled labor, equipment and supplies;~~

whether our acquisition, exploration and development activities, as well as the realization of the ~~fair~~market value of our assets, will be commercially ~~successful;~~

successful and whether any transactions we enter into will maximize the ~~lack~~realization of ~~cash dividend payments by us;~~the market value of our assets;

the success of future joint ventures, partnerships and other arrangements relating to our properties;

perception of the potential environmental impact of Mt Todd;

known and unknown environmental and reclamation liabilities, including reclamation requirements at Mt Todd;

potential challenges to the title to our ~~expectation of continuing losses from operations;~~mineral properties;

future water supply issues at Mt Todd;

litigation or other legal claims;

environmental lawsuits;

Financial and Business Risks

fluctuations in the price of gold;

lack of adequate insurance to cover potential liabilities;

the lack of cash dividend payments by us;

our history of losses from operations;

Table of Contents

our ability to attract, retain and hire key personnel;

~~fluctuations~~volatility in ~~the~~our stock price ~~of gold;~~and gold equities generally;

~~Table of Contents~~

~~volatility in~~ our ~~stock price and gold equities generally;~~ability to obtain a development partner for Mt Todd on favorable terms, if at all;

our ability to raise additional capital or raise funds from the sale of non-core assets on favorable terms, if at all;

industry consolidation which could result in the acquisition of a control position in the Company for less than fair value;

evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations;

intense competition in the mining industry;

tax initiatives on domestic and international levels;

fluctuation in foreign currency values;

potential adverse findings by the Australian Government upon review of our Australian research and development grants;

our likely status as a PFIC for U.S. federal tax purposes;

Industry Risks

inherent hazards of mining exploration, development and operating activities;

a shortage of skilled labor, equipment and supplies;

the accuracy of calculations of mineral reserves, mineral resources and mineralized material and fluctuations therein based on metal prices, and inherent vulnerability of the ore and recoverability of metal in the mining process;

changes in environmental regulations to which our exploration and development operations are subject; and

changes in climate change ~~legislation~~regulations could result in increased operating ~~costs;~~

~~intense competition in the mining industry;~~

~~potential challenges to the title to our mineral properties;~~

~~evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations;~~

~~tax initiatives on domestic and international levels;~~

~~fluctuation in foreign currency values;~~

~~fluctuation in the fair value or future cash flows of financial instruments;~~

~~the continuing long-term viability of the Company is dependent upon securing sufficient funding;~~

~~potential adverse findings in review of our Australian research and development grants; and~~

~~our likely status as a PFIC for U.S. federal tax purposes.~~costs.

For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, please see the risk factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, under “Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors”. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that these statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in the statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements and forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Cautionary Note to Investors Regarding Estimates of Mineral Reserves and Resources

Our technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Mt Todd Gold Project 50,000 tpd Preliminary Feasibility Study Northern Territory, Australia” with an effective date of ~~January 24, 2018~~September 10, 2019 and an issue date of ~~March 2, 2018~~October 7, 2019. referenced herein uses the terms “mineral reserve”, “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” as defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (the “CIM”) – CIM Definition Standards on Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, adopted by the CIM Council, as amended (the “CIM Definition Standards”). These definitions differ from the definitions in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7 (“SEC Industry Guide 7”) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study is required to report reserves, the three-year historical average metal price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis to designate reserves, and the primary environmental analysis or report must be filed with the appropriate governmental authority.

Table of Contents

In addition, the technical report uses the terms “mineral resource”, “measured mineral resource”, “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource” which are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however,

~~Table of Contents~~

these terms are not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral deposit in these categories will ever be converted into reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic, technical and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all, or any part, of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically, technically or legally mineable. Disclosure of “contained ounces” in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute “reserves” by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

Accordingly, the technical report contains descriptions of our mineral deposits that may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies ~~subject~~reporting under SEC Industry Guide 7.

The SEC has adopted amendments to its disclosure rules to modernize the mineral property disclosure requirements for issuers whose securities are registered with the SEC. These amendments became effective February 25, 2019 (the “SEC Modernization Rules”) and, following a two-year transition period, the SEC Modernization Rules will replace the historical property disclosure requirements for mining registrants that are included in SEC Industry Guide 7. The Company is not required to provide disclosure on its mineral properties under the SEC Modernization Rules until its fiscal year beginning January 1, 2021. Under the SEC Modernization Rules, the definitions of “proven mineral reserves” and “probable mineral reserves” have been amended to be substantially similar to the ~~reporting~~corresponding CIM Definition Standards and ~~disclosure requirements~~the SEC has added definitions to recognize “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” which are also substantially similar to the corresponding CIM Definition Standards; however there are differences in the definitions and standards under the SEC Modernization Rules and the CIM Definition Standards and therefore once the Company begins reporting under the SEC Modernization Rules there is no assurance that the Company’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates will be the same as those reported under CIM Definition Standards as contained in the technical report or that the economics for the Mt Todd project estimated in the technical report will be the same as those estimated in any technical report prepared by the Company under the SEC Modernization Rules in the future.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this report, we have provided information prepared or calculated according to United States ~~federal securities laws~~generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), as well as provided some non U.S. GAAP prospective financial performance measures. Because the non-GAAP performance measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. There are limitations associated with the use of such non-GAAP measures. Since these measures do not incorporate revenues, changes in working capital and non-operating cash costs, they are not necessarily indicative of potential operating profit or loss, or cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The non-GAAP measures Total Cash Costs, Cash Costs per ounce and All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) per ounce are not, and are not intended to be, presentations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As referenced in the ~~rules~~2019 PFS, these measures represent, respectively, our prospective cash costs and ~~regulations thereunder.~~all-in sustaining costs related to our Mt Todd project.

We believe that these metrics help investors understand the economics of the Mt Todd project. We present the Non-GAAP financial measures for our Mt Todd project in the tables below. Actual U.S. GAAP results may vary from the amounts disclosed. Other companies may calculate these measures differently.

2526

Table of Contents

~~ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.~~Total Cash Costs and All-In Sustaining Costs

~~Certain~~Total Cash Costs, Cash Costs per ounce, and All-in Sustaining Costs per ounce are non-GAAP metrics developed by the World Gold Council to provide transparency into the costs associated with producing gold and provide a comparable standard. The Company reports Cash Costs and AISC per ounce because it believes that these metrics more completely reflect mining costs over the life of a mine. These metrics are widely used in the ~~Company’s financial instruments are exposed to currency, credit~~gold mining industry as a benchmark for performance.

Total Cash Costs consist of operating costs net of power sales, refining costs, and ~~price risks. We do not currently hedge our exposure to any~~non-government royalties, and exclude depreciation and amortization. The sum of these ~~risks.~~costs is divided by the corresponding gold ounces estimated to be sold to determine a Cash Cost per ounce amount. The Company’s Total Cash Costs exclude the allocation of corporate general and administrative costs.

~~Currency risk~~All in Sustaining Costs consist of Total Cash Costs (as described above), plus sustaining capital costs. The sum of All-in Sustaining Costs is divided by the corresponding gold ounces estimated to be sold to determine All-in Sustaining Costs per ounce.

WeCosts excluded from Total Cash Costs and All-in Sustaining Costs are ~~exposed to financial risk~~income taxes, government royalties, financing charges, costs related to business combinations, asset acquisitions other than sustaining capital, and asset dispositions.

The following table reconciles the ~~fluctuation of foreign exchange rates. We operate in Australia~~Mt Todd Total Cash Costs, Cash Costs per ounce and AISC per ounce amounts with the project costs described in the United States. We report our financial results in U.S. currency. A significant change in the currency exchange rate between the Australian dollar and the U.S. dollar could affect our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.2019 PFS.

~~We typically limit our holdings in Australian dollars to the amount required to fund approximately one month of operating activities.~~

~~Credit risk~~

Concentration of credit risk exists related to our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Our Australian dollar cash is held in a major Australian chartered bank. Similarly, in the United States we hold U.S. dollar cash in a major U.S. bank. Our surplus cash is invested in government securities, principally notes and/or bills issued by the Treasury Department of the United States, and, occasionally notes and/or bills issued by the Government of Australia.

~~Other Price Risk~~

Other price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices, other than those arising from interest rate risk or foreign exchange risk. The Company’s investment in the common shares of Midas Gold is exposed to such risk.

~~Metal Price Risk~~

Changes in the market price of gold significantly affect the value of our assets, including our shares of Midas Gold. Gold prices can fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as demand; forward selling by producers; central bank sales, purchases and lending; investor sentiment; the strength of the U.S. dollar; inflation, deflation, or other general price instability; geopolitical events; and global mine production levels.


	Units	Years 1-5	Life of Mine (13 years)
Payable Gold	koz	2,476	5,305
Operating Costs	US$000s	1,381,396	3,333,631
Refining Cost	US$000s	7,910	17,075
Royalties	US$000s	33,420	71,615
Cash Costs	US$000s	1,422,726	3,422,321
Cash Cost per ounce	US$/oz	$575	$645

Sustaining Capital	US$000s	279,569	536,176
All-In-Sustaining Costs	US$000s	1,702,294	3,958,497
AISC per ounce	US$/oz	$688	$746

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

At the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the ~~nine~~three months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial ~~reporting.~~reporting.

2627

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities and/or other parties that are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 as filed with the SEC and Canadian securities regulatory authorities ~~on March 6, 2018.~~in February 2019.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE.

We consider health, safety and environmental stewardship to be a core value for us.

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the United States Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2011 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities under the regulation of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the United States Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). During the ~~nine~~three months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, our U.S exploration properties were not subject to regulation by the MSHA under the Mine Act and consequently no disclosure is required under Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

2728

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:


Exhibit Number		Description
3.01		Certificate of Continuation, previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated by reference herein (File No. 1-9025)
3.02		Notice of Articles, previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-9025)
3.03		Articles, previously filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated June 12, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference (File No. 1-9025)
4.01		Warrant Indenture dated August 8, 2016, previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporation’s Form 8-K dated August 8, 2016 and incorporated by reference herein (File No. 1-9025)
23.1		Consent of Tetra Tech, Inc.
23.2		Consent of Dr. Rex Clair Bryan
23.3		Consent of Anthony Clark
23.4		Consent of Thomas L. Dyer
23.5		Consent of Amy L. Hudson
23.6		Consent of Chris Johns
23.7		Consent of Deepak Malhotra
23.8		Consent of Zvonimir Ponos
23.9		Consent of Guy Roemer
23.10		Consent of Vicki Scharnhorst
23.11		Consent of Jessica I. Monasterio, P. E.
23.12		Consent of Keith Thompson
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*101.INS(1)		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*101.SCH(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Schema
101.CAL*101.CAL(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Calculations
101.DEF*101.DEF(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Definitions
101.LAB*101.LAB(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Labels
101.PRE*101.PRE(1)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Presentations

* - Filed herewith

(1)

Submitted ~~Electronically Herewith.~~electronically herewith. Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income/(Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2829

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	VISTA GOLD CORP. (Registrant)

Dated: October ~~29, 2018~~23, 2019	By:	/s/ Frederick H. Earnest
		Frederick H. Earnest,
		Chief Executive Officer

Dated: October ~~29, 2018~~23, 2019	By:	/s/ ~~John F. Engele~~Douglas L. Tobler
		~~John F. Engele~~Douglas L. Tobler
		Chief Financial Officer

2930


	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Fair value at beginning of period	$	3,746	$	4,994
Gain/(loss) during the period		1,754		(1,248)
Fair value at end of period	$	5,500	$	3,746

Midas Gold Shares held at the end of the period		7,802,615		7,802,615


	Fair value at September 30, 2018
	Total		Level 1		Level 3
Marketable securities	$	14	$	14	$	—
Other investments (Midas Gold Shares)		5,500		5,500		—

Foreign Exchange (US$/AUD)	Gold Price
	$1,100		$1,200		$1,300		$1,400		$1,500
	IRR	NPV₅	IRR	NPV₅	IRR	NPV₅	IRR	NPV₅	IRR	NPV₅
0.70	15.9%	$439	20.5%*	$632*	24.9%	$825	29.1%	$1,016	33.2%	$1,208
0.75	13.8%	$366	18.3%	$559	22.6%	$752	26.8%	$944	30.8%	$1,136
0.80	11.9%	$292	16.3%	$486	20.5%†	$679†	24.6%	$872	28.6%	$1,063
0.85	10.1%	$222	14.3%	$412	18.5%	$606	22.5%	$799	26.4%	$991
0.90	8.3%	$150	12.5%	$339	16.6%	$532	20.6%	$726	24.4%	$918
* Approximate current conditions †Assumptions used in the PFS


@ $1,300/oz Au	Years 1-5			Life of Mine (11 years)
Average Milled Grade (g Au/t)		0.95				0.90
Payable Gold Annual Average (000's ozs)		302				273
Payable Gold Total (000's ozs)		1,509				3,003
Gold Recovery		86.4	%			85.5	%
Cash Costs ($/oz)	$	581			$	593
Strip Ratio (waste:ore)		1.7				1.7
Initial Capital ($ millions)					$	641
Pre-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)					$	722
After-tax NPV _5% ($ millions)					$	418
IRR (Pre-tax/After-tax)						23.4 / 17.8	%
After-tax Payback (Production Years)						3.6