UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-9618

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	36-3359573
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2701 Navistar Drive, Lisle, Illinois	60532
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (331) 332-5000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

As of ~~August 31, 2015,~~February 29, 2016, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock was ~~81,522,206,~~81,593,034, net of treasury shares.

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
PART I—Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	5
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	6
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014~~2015	7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	8
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015	9
	Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements	10
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4840
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	6454
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	6454

PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6656
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6756
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6756
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	6756
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6756
Item 5.	Other Information	6756
Item 6.	Exhibits	6857
	Signatures	6958

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Information provided and statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("Securities Act"), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements only speak as of the date of this report and Navistar International Corporation assumes no obligation to update the information included in this report.

Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:

estimates we have made in preparing our financial statements;

our development of new products and technologies;

anticipated sales, volume, demand, ~~and~~ markets for our ~~products;~~products, and financial performance;

anticipated performance and benefits of our products and technologies;

our business strategies relating to, and our ability to meet, federal and state regulatory heavy-duty diesel emissions standards applicable to certain of our engines, including the timing and costs of compliance and consequences of noncompliance with such standards, as well as our ability to meet other federal, state and foreign regulatory requirements;

our business strategies and long-term goals, and activities to accomplish such strategies and goals;

our ability to ~~finish the “Drive-to-Deliver” turnaround and~~ implement our new strategy focused on establishing a leading market position based on uptime advantage, a customer-centric culture, leading with connected vehicle offerings, providing customers with meaningful innovation and tailored solutions, and developing effective leaders at every level, and the results we expect to achieve from the ~~completion of the turnaround and the~~ implementation of our new strategy;

~~anticipated results from~~ our ~~Return-on-Invested-Capital ("ROIC") methodology and the benchmarking study~~expectations related to ~~create a pathway to achieve profitability;~~new product launches;

anticipated results from the realignment of our leadership and management structure;

anticipated benefits from acquisitions, strategic alliances, and joint ventures we complete;

~~our expectations relating to the termination of our Blue Diamond Truck ("BDT") joint venture with Ford Motor Company ("Ford");~~

our expectations and estimates relating to restructuring activities, including restructuring and integration charges and timing of cash payments related thereto, and operational flexibility, savings, and efficiencies from such restructurings;

our expectations relating to the possible effects of anticipated divestitures and closures of businesses;

our expectations relating to our cost-reduction actions, including our enterprise-wide reduction-in-force, and other actions to reduce discretionary spending;

our expectations relating to our ability to service our long-term debt;

our expectations relating to our retail finance receivables and retail finance revenues;

our expectations and estimates relating to our used truck inventory;

our anticipated costs relating to the implementation of our emissions compliance strategy and other product modifications that may be required to meet other federal, state, and foreign regulatory requirements;

liabilities resulting from environmental, health and safety laws and regulations;

our anticipated capital expenditures;

our expectations relating to payments of taxes;

our expectations relating to warranty costs;

our expectations relating to interest expense;

our expectations relating to impairment of goodwill and other assets;

costs relating to litigation and similar matters;

estimates relating to pension plan contributions and unfunded pension and postretirement benefits;

trends relating to commodity prices; and

anticipated trends, expectations, and outlook relating to matters affecting our financial condition or results of operations.

These statements often include words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "estimate," or similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of performance or results and they involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there are many factors that could affect our ~~actual financial results or~~ results of operations and could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to differences in our future financial results include those discussed in Item 1A, Risk Factors, included within (i) our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, which was filed on December ~~16, 2014, and (ii) our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2015, which was filed on June 4,~~17, 2015, as well as those factors discussed elsewhere in this report. All future written and oral forward-looking statements by us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained herein or referred to above. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information as required by the federal securities laws, we do not have any obligations or intention to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances in the future or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Available Information

We are subject to the reporting and information requirements of the Exchange Act and as a result, are obligated to file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information with the United States ("U.S.") Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We make these filings available free of charge on our website (http://www.navistar.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or furnish them to, the SEC. Information on our website does not constitute part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition, the SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains our annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information we electronically file with, or furnish to, the SEC. Any materials we file with, or furnish to, the SEC may also be read and/or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

PART I—Financial Information


Item 1.	Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except per share data)	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
Sales and revenues
Sales of manufactured products, net	$	2,501		$	2,806		$	7,544		$	7,683		$	1,730		$	2,385
Finance revenues	37			38			108			115			35			36
Sales and revenues, net	2,538			2,844			7,652			7,798			1,765			2,421
Costs and expenses
Costs of products sold	2,172			2,417			6,577			6,899			1,466			2,045
Restructuring charges	13			16			22			27			3			3
Asset impairment charges	7			4			15			173			2			7
Selling, general and administrative expenses	220			241			704			717			205			241
Engineering and product development costs	71			80			226			253			58			79
Interest expense	75			78			227			234			81			77
Other income, net	(6		)	(11		)	(37		)	(5		)	(22		)	(3		)
Total costs and expenses	2,552			2,825			7,734			8,298			1,793			2,449
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates	3			2			6			5
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(11		)	21			(76		)	(495		)
Income tax expense	(12		)	(14		)	(37		)	(25		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations	(23		)	7			(113		)	(520		)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	2			1			2			3
Net income (loss)	(21		)	8			(111		)	(517		)
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates													(1		)	2
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes													(29		)	(26		)
Income tax benefit (expense)													5			(7		)
Loss from continuing operations													(24		)	(33		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax													—			—
Net loss													(24		)	(33		)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	7			10			23			30			9			9
Net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(28	)	$	(2	)	$	(134	)	$	(547	)	$	(33	)	$	(42	)

Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation common shareholders:
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(30	)	$	(3	)	$	(136	)	$	(550	)	$	(33	)	$	(42	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	2			1			2			3
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax													—			—
Net loss	$	(28	)	$	(2	)	$	(134	)	$	(547	)	$	(33	)	$	(42	)

Earnings (loss) per share:
Loss per share:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(6.77	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)
Discontinued operations	0.03			0.02			0.03			0.04			—			—
	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(1.64	)	$	(6.73	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)

Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(1.67	)	$	(6.77	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)
Discontinued operations	0.03			0.02			0.03			0.04			—			—
	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(1.64	)	$	(6.73	)	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	81.6			81.4			81.5			81.3			81.7			81.5
Diluted	81.6			81.4			81.5			81.3			81.7			81.5

See Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)

(in millions) Three Months Ended July 31, Nine Months Ended July 31,
2015 2014 2015 2014
Net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (28 ) $ (2 ) $ (134 ) $ (547 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment (47 ) (3 ) (133 ) (17 )
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $0, $(3), $(1), $(4), respectively) 33
33
98
83
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (14 ) 30
(35 ) 66
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (42 ) $ 28
$ (169 ) $ (481 )



(in millions)	Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2016			2015
Net loss	$	(24	)	$	(33	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(33		)	(59		)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $0 and $(1), respectively)	33			32
Total other comprehensive loss	—			(27		)
Comprehensive loss	(24		)	(60		)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests	9			9
Total comprehensive loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(33	)	$	(69	)

See Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets


	July 31, 2015			October 31, 2014			January 31, 2016			October 31, 2015
(in millions, except per share data)
ASSETS	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	547		$	497		$	579		$	912
Restricted cash and cash equivalents	200			40
Marketable securities	293			605			152			159
Trade and other receivables, net	430			553			340			429
Finance receivables, net	1,737			1,758			1,431			1,779
Inventories	1,199			1,319
Inventories, net							1,269			1,135
Deferred taxes, net	37			55			—			36
Other current assets	179			186			168			172
Total current assets	4,622			5,013			3,939			4,622
Restricted cash	157			131			118			121
Trade and other receivables, net	14			25			12			13
Finance receivables, net	213			280			198			216
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates	71			73			64			66
Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,534 and $2,535, respectively)	1,375			1,562
Property and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,555 and $2,546, respectively)							1,304			1,345
Goodwill	38			38			38			38
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $115 and $109, respectively)	67			90
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $123 and $120, respectively)							52			57
Deferred taxes, net	126			145			157			128
Other noncurrent assets	86			86			98			86
Total assets	$	6,769		$	7,443		$	5,980		$	6,692
LIABILITIES and STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Liabilities
Current liabilities
Notes payable and current maturities of long-term debt	$	1,090		$	1,295		$	1,492		$	1,110
Accounts payable	1,326			1,564			1,031			1,301
Other current liabilities	1,333			1,372			1,277			1,377
Total current liabilities	3,749			4,231			3,800			3,788
Long-term debt	4,196			3,929			3,607			4,188
Postretirement benefits liabilities	2,749			2,862			2,966			2,995
Deferred taxes, net	14			14			—			14
Other noncurrent liabilities	870			1,025			797			867
Total liabilities	11,578			12,061			11,170			11,852
Redeemable equity securities	1			2
Stockholders’ deficit
Series D convertible junior preference stock	3			3			2			2
Common stock (86.8 shares issued, and $0.10 par value per share and 220 shares authorized, all at both dates)	9			9			9			9
Additional paid-in capital	2,497			2,500			2,501			2,499
Accumulated deficit	(4,816		)	(4,682		)	(4,899		)	(4,866		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(2,298		)	(2,263		)	(2,601		)	(2,601		)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (5.3 and 5.4 shares, respectively)	(212		)	(221		)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (5.3 shares, at both dates)							(209		)	(210		)
Total stockholders’ deficit attributable to Navistar International Corporation	(4,817		)	(4,654		)	(5,197		)	(5,167		)
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interests	7			34			7			7
Total stockholders’ deficit	(4,810		)	(4,620		)	(5,190		)	(5,160		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	6,769		$	7,443		$	5,980		$	6,692

See Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(111	)	$	(517	)	$	(24	)	$	(33	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	165			177			39			58
Depreciation of equipment leased to others	56			79			19			21
Deferred taxes, including change in valuation allowance	(9		)	(4		)	(18		)	(12		)
Asset impairment charges	15			173			2			7
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount	28			38			9			9
Stock-based compensation	8			12			1			2
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries	(6		)	12			2			(3		)
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates, net of dividends	2			4			1			5
Write-off of debt issuance cost and discount	—			1
Other non-cash operating activities	(28		)	(27		)	(5		)	(11		)
Changes in other assets and liabilities, exclusive of the effects of businesses disposed	(134		)	(292		)	(128		)	(254		)
Net cash used in operating activities	(14		)	(344		)	(102		)	(211		)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of marketable securities	(515		)	(1,210		)	(117		)	(140		)
Sales of marketable securities	764			1,092			115			507
Maturities of marketable securities	63			330			9			63
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents	(192		)	(30		)	(1		)	53
Capital expenditures	(72		)	(57		)	(29		)	(17		)
Purchases of equipment leased to others	(58		)	(157		)	(49		)	(10		)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment	12			40			14			1
Proceeds from sales of affiliates	7			6
Acquisition of intangibles	(4		)	—
Net cash provided by investing activities	5			14
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates							(1		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities							(59		)	457
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of securitized debt	490			82			50			250
Principal payments on securitized debt	(247		)	(101		)	(8		)	(240		)
Net change in secured revolving credit facilities	(9		)	92			(108		)	(27		)
Proceeds from issuance of non-securitized debt	166			603			42			35
Principal payments on non-securitized debt	(234		)	(617		)	(77		)	(78		)
Net increase (decrease) in notes and debt outstanding under revolving credit facilities	(41		)	87
Net decrease in notes and debt outstanding under revolving credit facilities							(70		)	(43		)
Principal payments under financing arrangements and capital lease obligations	(2		)	(20		)	(1		)	—
Debt issuance costs	(10		)	(14		)	(1		)	(4		)
Proceeds from financed lease obligations	26			44			7			10
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	1			18
Dividends paid by subsidiaries to non-controlling interest	(27		)	(40		)	(10		)	(12		)
Other financing activities	(27		)	—			1			—
Net cash provided by financing activities	86			134
Net cash used in financing activities							(175		)	(109		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(27		)	(12		)	3			(14		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	50			(208		)	(333		)	123
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	497			755			912			497
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	547		$	547		$	579		$	620

See Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit

(Unaudited)


(in millions)	Series D Convertible Junior Preference Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Common Stock Held in Treasury, at cost			Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Non-controlling Interests			Total			Series D Convertible Junior Preference Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Common Stock Held in Treasury, at cost			Stockholders' Equity Attributable to Non-controlling Interests			Total
Balance as of October 31, 2015																							$	2	$	9	$	2,499		$	(4,866	)	$	(2,601	)	$	(210	)	$	7		$	(5,160	)
Net income (loss)																							—		—		—			(33		)	—			—			9			(24		)
Stock-based compensation																							—		—		2			—			—			—			—			2
Stock ownership programs																							—		—		(1		)	—			—			1			—			—
Cash dividends paid to non-controlling interest																							—		—		—			—			—			—			(10		)	(10		)
Acquire remaining ownership interest from non-controlling interest holder																							—		—		1			—			—			—			—			1
Other																							—		—		—			—			—			—			1			1
Balance as of January 31, 2016																							$	2	$	9	$	2,501		$	(4,899	)	$	(2,601	)	$	(209	)	$	7		$	(5,190	)

Balance as of October 31, 2014	$	3	$	9	$	2,500		$	(4,682	)	$	(2,263	)	$	(221	)	$	34		$	(4,620	)	$	3	$	9	$	2,500		$	(4,682	)	$	(2,263	)	$	(221	)	$	34		$	(4,620	)
Net income (loss)	—		—		—			(134		)	—			—			23			(111		)	—		—		—			(42		)	—			—			9			(33		)
Total other comprehensive loss	—		—		—			—			(35		)	—			—			(35		)	—		—		—			—			(27		)	—			—			(27		)
Transfer from redeemable equity securities upon exercise or expiration of stock options	—		—		1			—			—			—			—			1			—		—		1			—			—			—			—			1
Stock-based compensation	—		—		9			—			—			—			—			9			—		—		3			—			—			—			—			3
Stock ownership programs	—		—		(9		)	—			—			9			—			—			—		—		(4		)	—			—			3			—			(1		)
Cash dividends paid to non-controlling interest	—		—		—			—			—			—			(27		)	(27		)	—		—		—			—			—			—			(12		)	(12		)
Acquire remaining ownership interest from non-controlling interest holder	—		—		(4		)	—			—			—			(23		)	(27		)
Balance as of July 31, 2015	$	3	$	9	$	2,497		$	(4,816	)	$	(2,298	)	$	(212	)	$	7		$	(4,810	)

Balance as of October 31, 2013	$	3	$	9	$	2,477		$	(4,063	)	$	(1,824	)	$	(251	)	$	44		$	(3,605	)
Net income (loss)	—		—		—			(547		)	—			—			30			(517		)
Total other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			66			—			—			66
Transfer from redeemable equity securities upon exercise or expiration of stock options	—		—		2			—			—			—			—			2
Stock-based compensation	—		—		7			—			—			—			—			7
Stock ownership programs	—		—		(9		)	—			—			26			—			17
Equity component of convertible debt instruments, net of tax expense of $16	—		—		27			—			—			—			—			27
Equity component of repurchased convertible debt instruments, net of tax benefit of $3	—		—		(5		)	—			—			—			—			(5		)
Cash dividends paid to non-controlling interest	—		—		—			—			—			—			(40		)	(40		)
Balance as of July 31, 2014	$	3	$	9	$	2,499		$	(4,610	)	$	(1,758	)	$	(225	)	$	34		$	(4,048	)
Balance as of January 31, 2015																							$	3	$	9	$	2,500		$	(4,724	)	$	(2,290	)	$	(218	)	$	31		$	(4,689	)

See Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization and Description of the Business

Navistar International Corporation ("NIC"), incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in 1993, is a holding company whose principal operating entities are Navistar, Inc. and Navistar Financial Corporation ("NFC"). References herein to the "Company," "we," "our," or "us" refer collectively to NIC and its consolidated subsidiaries, including certain variable interest entities ("VIEs") of which we are the primary beneficiary. We operate in four principal industry segments: Truck, Parts, Global Operations (collectively called "Manufacturing operations"), and Financial Services, which consists of NFC and our foreign finance operations (collectively called "Financial Services operations"). These segments are discussed in Note 12, Segment Reporting.

Our fiscal year ends on October 31. As such, all references to ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 contained within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate to the fiscal year, unless otherwise indicated.

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of our Manufacturing operations, which include majority-owned dealers ("Dealcors"), and our Financial Services operations, including VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary. The effects of transactions among consolidated entities have been eliminated to arrive at the consolidated amounts.

Certain reclassifications were made to prior period amounts to conform to the 2015 presentation, which relate to the realignment of our reporting segments that became effective during the first quarter of 2015. For more information, see Note 12, ~~Segment Reporting. In addition, reclassifications~~Reclassifications were made to present the net change in secured revolving credit facilities as a separate line rather than within proceeds from issuance of securitized debt and principal payments on securitized debt onin the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows. This reclassification did not have an impact on our Condensed Statements of Cash Flows.

We prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States ("U.S.") generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for comprehensive annual financial statements.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, which should be read in conjunction with the disclosures therein. In our opinion, these interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual operating results.

Variable Interest Entities

We have an interest in several VIEs, primarily joint ventures, established to manufacture or distribute products and enhance our operational capabilities. We have determined for certain of our VIEs that we are the primary beneficiary because we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and we have the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Accordingly, we include in our consolidated financial statements the assets and liabilities and results of operations of those entities, even though we may not own a majority voting interest. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional claims on our general assets; rather they represent claims against the specific assets of these VIEs. Assets of these entities are not readily available to satisfy claims against our general assets.

We are the primary beneficiary of our Blue Diamond Parts ("BDP") joint venture with Ford. As a result, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets of ~~$56~~$40 million and ~~$57~~$50 million and liabilities of ~~$13~~$5 million and $5$7 million as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, including ~~$15~~$3 million and ~~$11~~$7 million of cash and cash equivalents, at the respective dates, which are not readily available to satisfy claims against our general assets. The creditors of BDP do not have recourse to our general credit.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

On May 29, 2015, we acquired Ford's remaining 25% ownership in our Blue Diamond Truck ("BDT") joint venture for $27 million. The acquisition of Ford's remaining ownership of the BDT joint venture did not have a material impact on our consolidated net loss for the three months ended July 31, 2015. Prior to the acquisition of Ford's remaining ownership, we were the primary beneficiary of our BDT joint venture with Ford. As a result, our ~~Consolidated Balance Sheets~~ at October 31, 2014 include assets of $240 million and liabilities of $245 million, including $66 million of cash and cash equivalents, which were not readily available to satisfy claims against our general assets.

Our Financial Services segment consolidates several VIEs. As a result, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include secured assets of ~~$1.3 billion~~$899 million and $1.1 billion as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, and liabilities of ~~$1.1 billion~~$766 million and ~~$896~~$844 million as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively, all of which are involved in securitizations that are treated as asset-backed debt.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In addition, our Consolidated Balance Sheets include secured assets of ~~$207~~$162 million and ~~$156~~$235 million as of January 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015, respectively, and corresponding liabilities of ~~$85 million and $54~~$107 million as of ~~July~~both January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014, respectively,~~2015, which are related to other secured transactions that do not qualify for sale accounting treatment, and therefore, are treated as borrowings secured by operating and finance leases. Investors that hold securitization debt have a priority claim on the cash flows generated by their respective securitized assets to the extent that the related VIEs are required to make principal and interest payments. Investors in securitizations of these entities have no recourse to our general credit.

We also have an interest in other VIEs, which we do not consolidate because we are not the primary beneficiary. Our financial support and maximum loss exposure relating to these non-consolidated VIEs are not material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We use the equity method to account for our investments in entities that we do not control under the voting interest or variable interest models, but where we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies. Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates includes our share of the net income of these entities.

Product Warranty Liability

The following table presents accrued product warranty and deferred warranty revenue activity:


	Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2016			2015
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,197		$	1,349		$	994		$	1,197
Costs accrued and revenues deferred	177			235			26			50
Currency translation adjustment	(7		)	(2		)	(1		)	(2		)
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties^(A)	(38		)	65			5			(57		)
Payments and revenues recognized	(313		)	(391		)	(102		)	(105		)
Balance at end of period	1,016			1,256			922			1,083
Less: Current portion	466			578			421			497
Noncurrent accrued product warranty and deferred warranty revenue	$	550		$	678		$	501		$	586

_________________________

(A)

Adjustments to pre-existing warranties reflect changes in our estimate of warranty costs for products sold in prior periods. Such adjustments typically occur when claims experience deviates from historic and expected trends. Our warranty liability is generally affected by component failure rates, repair costs, and the timing of failures. Future events and circumstances related to these factors could materially change our estimates and require adjustments to our liability. In addition, new product launches require a greater use of judgment in developing estimates until historical experience becomes available.

Adjustments to pre-existing warranties in the third quarter and nine months ended July 31, 2015 include a benefit of $2 million related to our Workhorse Custom Chassis operations, which are reported in Discontinued Operations in the In~~Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~ In the first quarter of 2015, we ~~recognized~~recorded a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $57 million or ~~a benefit of~~ $0.70 ~~per diluted share. In~~the first quarter of 2014, we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $52 million or charges of $0.64 per diluted share. In the second quarter of 2014, we recorded adjustments for changes in estimates of $42 million, or charges of $0.52 per diluted share. In the third quarter of 2014, we recognized a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $29 million, or a benefit of $0.36 per diluted share. The impact of income taxes on the ~~2015 and 2014~~ adjustments are not material due to our deferred tax valuation allowances on our U.S. deferred tax assets.

Extended Warranty Programs

The amount of deferred revenue related to extended warranty programs was ~~$419~~$383 million and ~~$437~~$401 million at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Revenue recognized under our extended warranty programs was ~~$40~~$38 million and ~~$115 million, in the three and nine months ended July 31, 2015, respectively, and $36 million and $96~~$37 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2014,~~2016 and 2015, respectively.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but are not limited to, pension and other postretirement benefits, allowance for doubtful accounts, income tax contingency accruals and valuation allowances, product warranty accruals, asbestos and other product liability accruals, asset impairment charges, and litigation-related accruals. Actual results could differ from our estimates.

Concentration Risks

Our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows are subject to concentration risks related to ~~concentrations of~~ our ~~union employees.~~significant unionized workforce. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, approximately ~~6,000,~~5,500, or ~~73%~~77%, of our hourly workers and approximately ~~200,~~300, or 3%5%, of our salaried workers, are represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our future operations may be affected by changes in governmental procurement policies, budget considerations, changing national defense requirements, and ~~global,~~ political, regulatory and economic developments in the U.S. and certain foreign countries (primarily Canada, Mexico, and Brazil).

~~Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets~~

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to the net assets. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level on an annual basis or more frequently, if circumstances change or an event occurs that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Qualitative factors may be assessed to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative assessment indicates that the carrying amount is more likely than not higher than the fair value, goodwill is tested for impairment based on a two-step test. The first step compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired, thus the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Significant judgment is applied when goodwill is assessed for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions, and selecting an appropriate control premium. The income approach is based on discounted cash flows which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations for each respective reporting unit.

An intangible asset determined to have an indefinite useful life is not amortized until its useful life is determined to no longer be indefinite. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Significant judgment is applied when evaluating if an intangible asset has a finite useful life. In addition, for indefinite-lived intangible assets, significant judgment is applied in testing for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, and incorporating general economic and market conditions.

During the third quarter of 2015, the economic downturn in Brazil resulted in the continued decline in actual and forecasted results for the Brazilian engine reporting unit with an indefinite-lived intangible asset, trademark, of $24 million. As a result, we performed an impairment analysis in the third quarter of 2015 utilizing the income approach, based on discounted cash flows, which are derived from internal forecasts and economic expectations. It was determined that the carrying value of the trademark exceeded its fair value. As a result, we determined that the trademark was impaired and recognized an impairment charge of $3 million. The non-cash impairment charges were included in ~~Asset impairment charges~~ ~~in the Company's~~ ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~ ~~The Brazilian engine reporting unit is included in the Global Operations segment.~~

1211

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Our gross used truck inventory increased to approximately $440 million at January 31, 2016 from $390 million at October 31, 2015, offset by reserves of $145 million and $110 million, respectively. During the ~~second~~ quarter ended January 31, 2016, additional reserves of ~~2014,~~$35 million were recorded primarily in Costs of products sold.

In valuing our used truck inventory, we are required to make assumptions regarding the ~~economic downturn in Brazil resulted in the continued decline in actual~~level of reserves required to value inventories at their net realizable value ("NRV"). Our judgments and estimates for used truck inventory are based on an analysis of current and forecasted ~~results~~sales prices, aging of and demand for used trucks, and the ~~Brazilian engine reporting unit with goodwill~~mix of ~~$142 million and an indefinite-lived intangible asset, trademark, of $43 million. As a result, we performed an impairment analysis in the second quarter of 2014 utilizing the income approach,~~sales through various market channels. The NRV is subject to change based on ~~discounted cash flows, which~~numerous conditions taking into account age, specifications, mileage, timing of sales, market mix and current and forecasted pricing. While calculations are ~~derived from internal forecasts~~made involving these factors, significant management judgment regarding expectations for future events is involved. Future events that could significantly influence our judgment and related estimates include general economic ~~expectations. It was determined that~~conditions in markets where our products are sold, actions of our competitors, and the ~~carrying value of the Brazilian engine reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeded its fair value. As~~ability to sell used trucks in a result we compared the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. A decrease in the enterprise value of the reporting unit coupled with appreciation in the value of certain tangible assets, which are not recognized for accounting purposes, resulted in the determination that the entire $142 million of goodwill was impaired. In addition, we determined that the related trademark was impaired and recognized an impairment charge of $7 million. The non-cash impairment charges were included in ~~Asset impairment charges~~ ~~in the Company's~~ ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~ ~~The Brazilian engine reporting unit is included in the Global Operations segment.~~timely manner.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015, the Company has~~2016, we have not adopted any new accounting guidance that has had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, ~~Revenue~~"Revenue from Contracts with ~~Customers~~Customers" (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, ~~Revenue~~"Revenue Recognition." This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ~~On July 9,~~In August 2015, the FASB ~~deferred~~issued ASU No. 2015-14, which postponed the effective date of ~~this update~~ASU No. 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted on the original effective date of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Our effective date for this ASU is November 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and method of adoption.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases" (Topic 842). This ASU requires lessees to recognize, on the balance sheet, assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases of greater than twelve months. The accounting by lessors will remain largely unchanged. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Our effective date for this ASU is November 1, 2019. Adoption will require a modified retrospective transition. We are currently evaluating the method of adoption and the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

2. Restructurings and Impairments

Restructuring charges are recorded based on restructuring plans that have been committed to by management and are, in part, based upon management's best estimates of future events. Changes to the estimates may require future adjustments to the restructuring liabilities.

Restructuring Liability

The following tables summarize the activity in the restructuring liability, which includes amounts related to discontinued operations and excludes pension and other postretirement contractual termination benefits:

(in millions) Balance at October 31, 2014 Additions Payments Adjustments
Balance at
July 31, 2015
Employee termination charges $ 8
$ 17
$ (7 ) $ (2 ) $ 16
Lease vacancy 11
—
(6 ) —
5
Other 1
2
(2 ) —
1
Restructuring liability $ 20
$ 19
$ (15 ) $ (2 ) $ 22

(in millions) Balance at
October 31, 2013 Additions Payments Adjustments
Balance at
July 31, 2014
Employee termination charges $ 15
$ 12
$ (12 ) $ (2 ) $ 13
Employee relocation costs —
1
(1 ) —
—
Lease vacancy 18
1
(6 ) —
13
Other 1
—
(2 ) —
(1 )
Restructuring liability $ 34
$ 14
$ (21 ) $ (2 ) $ 25



(in millions)	Balance at October 31, 2015		Additions		Payments			Adjustments			Balance at January 31, 2016
Employee termination charges	$	62	$	4	$	(22	)	$	(2	)	$	42
Lease vacancy	5		—		(3		)	—			2
Other	1		—		—			—			1
Restructuring liability	$	68	$	4	$	(25	)	$	(2	)	$	45

1312

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)



(in millions)	Balance at October 31, 2014		Additions		Payments			Adjustments			Balance at January 31, 2015
Employee termination charges	$	8	$	3	$	(3	)	$	(1	)	$	7
Lease vacancy	11		—		(2		)	—			9
Other	1		—		—			—			1
Restructuring liability	$	20	$	3	$	(5	)	$	(1	)	$	17

North American Manufacturing Restructuring Activities

We continue to focus on our core ~~North American~~ Truck and Parts businesses. We continue to evaluate our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit, with the purpose of closing or divesting non-core/non-strategic businesses, and identifying opportunities to restructure our business and rationalize our Manufacturing operations in an effort to optimize our cost structure. ~~The Company is currently evaluating its portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. To allow us to increase~~For those areas that fall outside our ~~focus on our North America~~ core businesses, we are evaluating product lines, businesses, and engineering programs that fall outside of our core businesses. We are using a Return-On-Invested-Capital ("ROIC") methodology, combined with an assessment of the strategic fit to our core businesses, to identify areas that are not performing to our expectations. For those areas, we are evaluating whether to fix, divest, or close. These actionsalternatives which could result in additional restructuring and other related charges in the future, including but not limited to: (i) impairments, (ii) costs for employee and contractor termination and other related benefits, and (iii) charges for pension and other postretirement contractual benefits and curtailments. These charges could be significant.

Chatham restructuring activities

In the third quarter of 2011, ~~the Company~~we committed to close ~~its~~our Chatham, Ontario heavy truck plant, which had been idled since June 2009. At that time, we recognized curtailment and contractual termination charges related to postretirement plans. Based on a ruling regarding pension benefits received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada, in the third quarter of 2014, we recognized additional charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of the Chatham, Ontario plant. We appealed this ruling, but it was upheld in a July 3, 2015 decision issued by the Divisional Court of Ontario. On July 23, 2015, we filed a notice of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario, which was perfected on August 25, 2015 through an additional filing. On December 21, 2015, the Ontario Court of Appeal denied the motion for leave to appeal. We are in the process of preparing the final partial wind-up report for approval by the Financial Services Commission of Ontario. Potential ~~additional~~ charges in future periods could range from $0 million to $60 million, primarily related to pension, postretirement costs and termination benefits, which are subject to governmental approval, employee negotiation, acceptance rates and the resolution of disputes related thereto. ~~Based~~In addition, we are evaluating the impact of the ruling on ~~a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada, in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized~~prior plan administration practices and it is probable that additional charges ~~of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant. The Company appealed this ruling,~~will be recognized, but it was upheld in a July 3, 2015 decision issued by the Divisional Court of Ontario. On July 23, 2015, the Company filed a notice of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario. The appeal was perfected on August 25, 2015 through an additional filing. See Note 7, ~~Postretirement benefits~~ ~~for further discussion.~~those charges are currently not estimable.

Foundry Facilities

In December 2014, we announced the closure of our Indianapolis, Indiana foundry facility and on June 30, 2015, we closed ~~our Indianapolis, Indiana~~this foundry. In addition, on April 30, 2015, we sold our Waukesha, Wisconsin foundry operations. As a result, in the first quarter of ~~these actions,~~2015, the Truck segment recognized charges of $3$13 million ~~and $28 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, respectively,~~ for the acceleration of depreciation of certain assets related to the foundry facilities. These charges are reported within Costs of products sold in ~~the Company's~~our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

~~Cost-Reductions and Other Strategic Initiatives~~

From time to time, we have announced, and we may continue to announce, actions to control spending across the Company with targeted reductions of certain costs. We are focused on continued reductions in discretionary spending, including reductions resulting from efficiencies, and prioritizing or eliminating certain programs or projects.

In the third quarter of 2015, the Company initiated new cost-reduction actions, including a reduction-in-force in the U.S. and Brazil. As a result of these actions, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $13 million in personnel costs for employee termination and related benefits, which will be paid throughout 2015 and 2016.

In the second quarter of 2014, the Company initiated new cost-reduction actions, including an enterprise-wide reduction-in-force. As a result of these actions, the Company recognized restructuring charges of $8 million in personnel costs for employee termination and related benefits, the majority of which was paid during 2014. The Company expects the remaining restructuring charges will be paid throughout 2015.

Asset Impairments

~~The following table reconciles our impairment charges in our~~ ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations~~

Three Months Ended July 31, Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions) 2015 2014 2015 2014
Goodwill impairment charge $ —
$ —
$ —
$ 142
Intangible asset impairment charge 3
—
3
7
Other asset impairment charges related to continuing operations 4
4
12
24
Total asset impairment charges $ 7
$ 4
$ 15
$ 173

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In the ~~third~~first quarter of 2015, the Company recognized impairment charges of $7 million, the majority of which was for certain long-lived assets in our Truck segment and certain intangible assets of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results,2016, we ~~tested the indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined~~concluded that ~~$3 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired. For more information, see Note 1,~~ ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.~~ ~~In addition, during the third quarter of 2015, the Company concluded it had~~ a triggering event ~~related to certain long-lived~~occurred in connection with the potential sale of Pure Power Technologies ("PPT") assets requiring the impairment of its assets in the Truck segment. As a result, ~~certain long-lived assets were determined to be impaired, resulting in~~ a charge of ~~$3 million. These charges are~~approximately $2 million was recognized in the first quarter of 2016. This charge is reported within Asset impairment chargesin ~~the Company's~~our Consolidated Statements of Operations.In February 2016, we sold PPT, a components business focused on air and fuel systems.

In the first quarter of 2015, ~~the Company~~we concluded itwe had a triggering event related to certain ~~operating leases.~~equipment leased to others. As a result, the Truck segment recorded $7 million of asset impairment charges. These charges ~~which~~ are ~~recognized in~~reported within Asset impairment chargesin ~~the Company's~~our Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations~~. Operations.

In the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a total non-cash charge of $149 million for the impairment of certain intangible assets of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual

Navistar International Corporation and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademarks were impaired. For more information, see Note 1, ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.~~Subsidiaries

~~In the first quarter of 2014, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related~~Notes to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets in the Truck segment. As a result, certain amortizing intangible assets and long-lived assets were determined to be fully impaired, resulting in an impairment charge of $19 million that was recognized in the nine months ended July 31, 2014 in ~~Asset impairment charges~~ ~~in the Company's~~ Consolidated ~~Statements of Operations~~. Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

3. Finance Receivables

Finance receivables are receivables of our Financial Services operations. Finance receivables generally consist of wholesale notes and accounts, as well as retail notes, finance leases and accounts. Total finance receivables reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Total assets of our Financial Services operations net of intercompany balances are ~~$2.7~~$2.1 billion and ~~$2.6~~$2.5 billion as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Included in total assets of our Financial Services operations are finance receivables of $1.6 billion and $2.0 billion as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014.~~2015, respectively. We have two portfolio segments of finance receivables that we distinguish based on the type of customer and nature of the financing inherent to each portfolio. The retail portfolio segment represents loans or leases to end-users for the purchase or lease of vehicles. The wholesale portfolio segment represents loans to dealers to finance their inventory.

Our Finance receivables, net consist of the following:


(in millions)	July 31, 2015		October 31, 2014		January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015
Retail portfolio	$	606	$	726	$	446	$	554
Wholesale portfolio	1,372		1,339		1,206		1,467
Total finance receivables	1,978		2,065		1,652		2,021
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts	28		27		23		26
Total finance receivables, net	1,950		2,038		1,629		1,995
Less: Current portion, net^(A)	1,737		1,758		1,431		1,779
Noncurrent portion, net	$	213	$	280	$	198	$	216

_________________________


(A)	The current portion of finance receivables is computed based on contractual maturities. Actual cash collections typically vary from the contractual cash flows because of prepayments, extensions, delinquencies, credit losses, and renewals.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Securitizations

Our Financial Services operations ~~transfers~~transfer wholesale notes, retail accounts receivable, retail notes, finance leases, and operating leases ~~through~~to special purpose entities ("SPEs"), which generally are only permitted to purchase these assets, issue asset-backed securities, and make payments on the ~~securities.~~securities issued. In addition to servicing receivables, our continued involvement in the SPEs may include an economic interest in the transferred receivables and, in some cases, managing exposure to interest ~~rates~~rate changes on the securities using interest rate swaps ~~and~~or interest rate caps. There were no transfers of finance receivables that qualified for sale accounting treatment as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and as a result, the transferred finance receivables are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and the related interest earned is included in Finance revenues.

We transfer eligible finance receivables into retail note owner trusts or wholesale note owner trusts in order to issue asset-backed securities. These trusts are VIEs of which we are determined to be the primary beneficiary and, therefore, the assets and liabilities of the trusts are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The outstanding balance of finance receivables transferred into these VIEs was $843 million and $1.0 billion ~~and $996 million~~ as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. Other finance receivables related to secured transactions that do not qualify for sale accounting treatment were ~~$129~~$43 million and ~~$93~~$96 million as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. For more information on assets and liabilities of consolidated VIEs and other securitizations accounted for as secured borrowings by our Financial Services segment, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Finance Revenues

The following table presents the components of our Finance revenues:


	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
Retail notes and finance leases revenue	$	12		$	16		$	37		$	49		$	10		$	13
Wholesale notes interest	27			22			75			59			26			24
Operating lease revenue	16			15			46			44			16			15
Retail and wholesale accounts interest	8			7			25			20			7			8
Gross finance revenues	63			60			183			172			59			60
Less: Intercompany revenues	(26		)	(22		)	(75		)	(57		)	(24		)	(24		)
Finance revenues	$	37		$	38		$	108		$	115		$	35		$	36

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

4. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our two finance receivables portfolio segments, retail and wholesale, each consist of one class of receivable based on: (i) initial measurement attributes of the receivables, and (ii) the assessment and monitoring of risk and performance of the receivables. For more information, see Note 3, Finance Receivables.

The following tables present the activity related to our allowance for doubtful accounts for our retail portfolio segment, wholesale portfolio segment, and trade and other receivables:


	Three Months Ended July 31, 2015											Three Months Ended July 31, 2014											Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
(in millions)	Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total			Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total			Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at beginning of period	$	25		$	3	$	30		$	58		$	22		$	2	$	38		$	62		$	22		$	4	$	22		$	48
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries	2			—		—			2			3			—		—			3			2			—		3			5
Charge-off of accounts^(A)	—			—		(1		)	(1		)	(2		)	—		(3		)	(5		)	(3		)	—		(1		)	(4		)
Other^(B)	(2		)	—		(3		)	(5		)	1			—		(1		)	—			(2		)	—		(1		)	(3		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at end of period	$	25		$	3	$	26		$	54		$	24		$	2	$	34		$	60		$	19		$	4	$	23		$	46


	Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015											Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014											Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
(in millions)	Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total			Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total			Retail Portfolio			Wholesale Portfolio		Trade and Other Receivables			Total
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at beginning of period	$	24		$	3	$	38		$	65		$	21		$	2	$	37		$	60		$	24		$	3	$	38		$	65
Provision for doubtful accounts, net of recoveries	7			—		—			7			10			—		3			13			2			—		—			2
Charge-off of accounts^(A)	(1		)	—		(4		)	(5		)	(7		)	—		(5		)	(12		)	(1		)	—		(3		)	(4		)
Other^(B)	(5		)	—		(8		)	(13		)	—			—		(1		)	(1		)	(2		)	—		(3		)	(5		)
Allowance for doubtful accounts, at end of period	$	25		$	3	$	26		$	54		$	24		$	2	$	34		$	60		$	23		$	3	$	32		$	58

~~________________________~~

_________________________

(A)

We repossess sold and leased vehicles on defaulted finance receivables and leases, and place them into Inventories. Losses recognized at the time of repossession and charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts were ~~both~~ less than $1 million ~~for~~in both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015, as well as for the three~~2016 and ~~nine months ended July 31, 2014.~~2015.

~~(B) Amounts include currency translation.~~


(B)	Amounts include impact from currency translation.

The accrual of interest income is discontinued on certain impaired finance receivables. Impaired finance receivables include accounts with specific loss reserves and certain accounts that are on non-accrual status. In certain cases, we continue to collect payments on our impaired finance receivables.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The following table presents information regarding impaired finance receivables:


	July 31, 2015						October 31, 2014						January 31, 2016						October 31, 2015
(in millions)	Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total
Impaired finance receivables with specific loss reserves	$	21	$	—	$	21	$	20	$	—	$	20	$	19	$	—	$	19	$	21	$	—	$	21
Impaired finance receivables without specific loss reserves	—		—		—		1		—		1		—		—		—		—		—		—
Specific loss reserves on impaired finance receivables	10		—		10		6		—		6		12		—		12		9		—		9
Finance receivables on non-accrual status	21		—		21		21		—		21		19		—		19		21		—		21

~~For~~The average balances of the impaired finance receivables in the retail portfolio ~~as of July 31, 2015 and 2014, the average balances of those receivables~~ were ~~$21~~$20 million and ~~$15~~$19 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, ~~and 2014,~~ respectively.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~The Company uses~~We use the aging of ~~its~~our receivables as well as other inputs when assessing credit quality. The following table presents the aging analysis for finance receivables:


	July 31, 2015						October 31, 2014						January 31, 2016						October 31, 2015
(in millions)	Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total		Retail Portfolio		Wholesale Portfolio		Total
Current, and up to 30 days past due	$	531	$	1,369	$	1,900	$	643	$	1,333	$	1,976	$	382	$	1,202	$	1,584	$	486	$	1,461	$	1,947
30-90 days past due	58		2		60		64		2		66		46		3		49		48		4		52
Over 90 days past due	17		1		18		19		4		23		18		1		19		20		2		22
Total finance receivables	$	606	$	1,372	$	1,978	$	726	$	1,339	$	2,065	$	446	$	1,206	$	1,652	$	554	$	1,467	$	2,021

5. Inventories

The following table presents the components of Inventories:

(in millions) July 31,
2015 October 31,
2014
Finished products $ 772
$ 880
Work in process 66
50
Raw materials 361
389
Total inventories $ 1,199
$ 1,319

~~6. Debt~~

(in millions) July 31, 2015 October 31, 2014
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as amended, due 2017, net of unamortized discount of $2 and $3, respectively $ 695
$ 694
8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, net of unamortized discount of $18 and $20, respectively 1,182
1,180
4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018, net of unamortized discount of $16 and $19, respectively 184
181
4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019, net of unamortized discount of $34 and $40, respectively 377
371
Debt of majority-owned dealerships 26
30
Financing arrangements and capital lease obligations 48
54
Loan Agreement related to 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040 225
225
Promissory Note 3
10
Financed lease obligations 129
184
Other 19
29
Total Manufacturing operations debt 2,888
2,958
Less: Current portion 100
100
Net long-term Manufacturing operations debt $ 2,788
$ 2,858

(in millions) July 31, 2015 October 31, 2014
Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at fixed and variable rates, due serially through 2018 $ 1,135
$ 914
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2015 through 2020 1,147
1,242
Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2017 90
74
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2018 26
36
Total Financial Services operations debt 2,398
2,266
Less: Current portion 990
1,195
Net long-term Financial Services operations debt $ 1,408
$ 1,071



(in millions)	January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015
Finished products	$	891	$	837
Work in process	69		34
Raw materials	309		264
Total inventories, net	$	1,269	$	1,135

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~Manufacturing Operations~~

~~3.00% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes~~

In October 2009, we completed the sale of $570 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% senior subordinated convertible notes ("2014 Convertible Notes"), including over-allotment options. The 2014 Convertible Notes were senior subordinated unsecured obligations of the Company.

In connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, the Company purchased call options for $125 million. The call options covered 11,337,870 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments, at an exercise price of $50.27. The call options were intended to minimize share dilution associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes. In addition, in connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, the Company also entered into separate warrant transactions whereby, the Company sold warrants for $87 million to sell in the aggregate 11,337,870 shares of common stock, subject to adjustments, at an exercise price of $60.14 per share of common stock.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company used proceeds from the private issuance of $411 million of 4.75% senior subordinated convertible notes due April 2019 ("2019 Convertible Notes"), as well as cash on-hand, to repurchase $404 million of notional amount of the 2014 Convertible Notes. The Company recorded a charge of $11 million related to the repurchase which was recognized in ~~Other income, net.~~ In conjunction with the repurchases of the 2014 Convertible Notes, call options representing 8,026,456 shares expired or were unwound by the Company and warrants representing 6,523,319 shares were unwound by the Company. On October 15, 2014, upon maturity, the 2014 Convertible Notes were paid in full and the purchased call options expired worthless.

~~During the first quarter of 2015, warrants representing 1,939,376 shares were unwound by the Company, and the remaining 2,875,175 warrants expired worthless on April 10, 2015.~~

~~Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility~~

In August 2012, NIC and Navistar, Inc. signed a definitive credit agreement relating to a senior secured, term loan credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1 billion (the "Term Loan Credit Facility") and borrowed an aggregate principal amount of $1 billion under the Term Loan Credit Facility. The Term Loan Credit Facility required quarterly principal amortization payments of 0.25% of the aggregate principal amount, with the balance due at maturity.

The Term Loan Credit Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in certain assets of NIC, Navistar, Inc., and fourteen of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and contains customary provisions for financings of this type, including, without limitation, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. Generally, if an event of default occurs and is not cured within any specified grace period, the administrative agent, at the request of (or with the consent of) the lenders holding not less than a majority in principal amount of the outstanding term loans, may declare the term loan to be due and payable immediately.

In April 2013, the Term Loan Credit Facility was amended (the "Amended Term Loan Credit Facility"), to: (i) change the maturity date of all borrowings under the Term Loan Credit Facility to August 17, 2017, (ii) lower the interest on all borrowings under the Term Loan Credit Facility to a rate equal to a base rate plus a spread of 3.50%, or a Eurodollar rate plus a spread of 4.50% with a London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") floor that was reduced to 1.25%, (iii) provide additional operating flexibility, and (iv) remove certain pledged assets as collateral from the Term Loan Credit Facility.

In August 2015, the Amended Term Loan Credit Facility was refinanced with a new Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility (“Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility”), for $1.04 billion. Under the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility: (i) the maturity date was extended to August 7, 2020, (ii) interest rate margins were increased to 5.50% for Eurodollar rate loans and 4.50% for base rate loans, (iii) the Eurodollar rate “floor” was reduced to 1.00%, (iv) the permitted receivables financing basket was increased from $25 million to $50 million, (v) certain prepayments of the Amended Term Loan Credit Facility made prior to August 7, 2017 will be made subject to a call premium of 1.00%, (vi) certain definitional provisions, including those related to asset dispositions were modified, and (vii) quarterly principal amortization payments of 0.25% of the aggregate principal amount are required, with the balance due at maturity. As a consequence of the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility refinancing, the maturity date of Navistar, Inc.’s Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility (as defined below) was extended from May 18, 2017 to May 18, 2018.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility~~

In August 2012, Navistar, Inc. entered into an amended and restated asset-based credit agreement in an aggregate principal amount of $175 million (the "Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility"). The borrowing base of the facility was secured by a first priority security interest in Navistar, Inc.'s aftermarket parts inventory that is stored at certain parts distribution centers, storage facilities and third-party processor or logistics provider locations. In April 2013, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was amended to include used truck inventory in the borrowing base.

Also in April 2013, the maturity date of the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility automatically extended to May 18, 2017, as a result of a modification to the maturity date of our Amended Term Loan Credit Facility. The Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility contains customary provisions for financings of this type, including, without limitation, representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. All borrowings under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate equal to a base rate or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread. The spread, which will be based on an availability-based measure, ranges from 175 basis points to 225 basis points for Base Rate borrowings and 275 basis points to 325 basis points for LIBOR borrowings. The initial LIBOR spread is 275 basis points.

On July 3, 2014, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was further amended to remove used truck inventory from the borrowing base. Additionally, the calculation of availability was revised to include cash collateral posted to support outstanding designated letters of credit, subject to a $40 million cap, and the cash management provisions were amended to reflect intercreditor arrangements with respect to a financing with Navistar Financial Corporation secured by a first priority lien on the used truck inventory. In connection with the removal of used truck inventory from the borrowing base, certain adjustments were made to the covenants to reflect that such assets were no longer included in the borrowing base. The amendment also provides for a 1.00% reduction in the amount of the participation fee with respect to designated letters of credit in the event that all outstanding letters of credit are in excess of $50 million, such reduction applying only to the portion of designated letters of credit in excess of $50 million for all outstanding letters of credit.

On July 15, 2015, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was further amended to: (i) permit the incurrence of up to $352.5 million of additional term loans and the issuance of up to $200 million of additional senior notes, (ii) increase the permitted receivables financing from $25 million to $50 million, and (iii) modify the cash dominion trigger and certain of the definitional provisions. As a consequence of the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, the maturity date of the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was extended by one year to May 18, 2018. The amendment had no impact on the aggregate commitment level under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility, which remains at $175 million. As of July 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, we had no borrowings under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility. The availability under our $175 million Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility is subject to a $35 million liquidity block, less outstanding standby letters of credit issued under this facility, and is impacted by inventory levels at certain aftermarket parts inventory locations.

~~Financial Services Operations~~

~~Asset-backed Debt~~

In July 2015, NFC issued $250 million of two-year investor notes secured by assets of the wholesale note owner trust, of which $240 million were sold to initial purchasers. Proceeds will be used, in part, to replace the $250 million of investor notes that mature in September 2015.

~~In January 2015, the maturity date of the $500 million variable funding notes ("VFN") facility was extended from March 2015 to January 2016.~~

In November 2014, NFC completed the sale of $250 million of two-year investor notes secured by assets of the wholesale note owner trust. Proceeds were used, in part, to replace the $200 million of investor notes that matured in January 2015. Also in November 2014, the wholesale note owner trust was amended to reduce customer concentration restrictions.

~~Bank Revolvers and Commercial Paper~~

In January 2015, NFC paid $125 million in cash dividends to Navistar, Inc. Dividends and certain affiliate loans are subject to the restricted payment covenants set forth in the NFC bank credit facility.

Effective December 2014, our Mexican financial services operation entered into a new two-year commercial paper program for up to P$1.8 billion (the equivalent of approximately US $111 million at July 31, 2015). This program replaces the existing program that was to mature in August 2015.

2016

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

6. Debt



(in millions)	January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as amended, due 2020, net of unamortized discount of $16 and $17, respectively	$	1,024	$	1,023
8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, net of unamortized discount of $17 and $18, respectively	1,183		1,182
4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018, net of unamortized discount of $13 and $14, respectively	187		186
4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019, net of unamortized discount of $30 and $32, respectively	381		379
Debt of majority-owned dealerships	20		28
Financing arrangements and capital lease obligations	46		49
Loan Agreement related to 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040	225		225
Financed lease obligations	91		111
Other	15		15
Total Manufacturing operations debt	3,172		3,198
Less: Current portion	87		103
Net long-term Manufacturing operations debt	$	3,085	$	3,095



(in millions)	January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015
Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at fixed and variable rates, due serially through 2021	$	784	$	870
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2016 through 2020	981		1,063
Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2017	74		86
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2020	88		81
Total Financial Services operations debt	1,927		2,100
Less: Current portion	1,405		1,007
Net long-term Financial Services operations debt	$	522	$	1,093

Financial Services Operations

Asset-backed Debt

In February 2016, the maximum capacity of NFC’s wholesale variable funding notes facility was increased from $375 million to $500 million.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

7. Postretirement Benefits

Defined Benefit Plans

We provide postretirement benefits to a substantial portion of our employees and retirees. Costs associated with postretirement benefits include pension and postretirement health care expenses for employees, retirees, surviving spouses and dependents.

Generally, the pension plans are non-contributory. Our policy is to fund the pension plans in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations and to make additional contributions from time to time. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, we contributed ~~$11~~$19 million and ~~$73 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, we contributed $33 million and $98~~$30 million, respectively, to our pension plans to meet regulatory funding requirements. In August 2014, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 ("HATFA"), including extension of pension funding interest rate relief, was signed into law. As a result, we lowered our future funding expectations in 2014. We ~~currently anticipate additional contributions of $40~~expect to contribute approximately $80 million to our pension plans during the remainder of ~~2015.~~2016.

We primarily fund other post-employment benefit ("OPEB") obligations, such as retiree medical, in accordance with a 1993 Settlement Agreement (the "1993 Settlement Agreement"), which requires us to fund a portion of the plans' annual service cost to a retiree benefit trust (the "Base Trust"). The 1993 Settlement Agreement resolved a class action lawsuit originally filed in 1992 regarding the restructuring of ~~the Company's~~our then applicable retiree health care and life insurance benefits. Contributions for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, as well as anticipated contributions for the remainder of ~~2015,~~2016, are not material.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense

Net ~~postretirement benefits~~periodic benefit expense included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is comprised of the following:


	Three Months Ended July 31,												Nine Months Ended July 31,												Three Months Ended January 31,
	Pension Benefits						Health and Life Insurance Benefits						Pension Benefits						Health and Life Insurance Benefits						Pension Benefits						Health and Life Insurance Benefits
(in millions)	2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015			2016			2015
Service cost for benefits earned during the period	$	3		$	3		$	2		$	2		$	9		$	9		$	5		$	4		$	2		$	3		$	1		$	1
Interest on obligation	35			39			17			17			106			118			53			51			30			36			15			18
Amortization of cumulative loss	25			23			10			4			74			70			29			12			26			25			8			10
Amortization of prior service benefit	—			—			(1		)	(1		)	—			—			(3		)	(3		)	—			—			—			(1		)
Contractual termination benefits	—			14			—			—			(1		)	14			(1		)	—
Premiums on pension insurance	3			—			—			—			8			—			—			—			4			1			—			—
Expected return on assets	(48		)	(48		)	(7		)	(8		)	(145		)	(144		)	(22		)	(24		)	(42		)	(49		)	(6		)	(7		)
Net postretirement benefits expense	$	18		$	31		$	21		$	14		$	51		$	67		$	61		$	40
Net periodic benefit expense																									$	20		$	16		$	18		$	21

~~Based on~~In 2016, we changed the approach utilized to estimate the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic benefit cost for our major defined benefit postretirement plans. Historically, we estimated the service cost and interest cost components using a ~~ruling received~~single weighted average discount rate derived from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada, in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized contractual termination charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant. The Company appealed this ruling, but it was upheld in a July 3, 2015 decision issued by the Divisional Court of Ontario. On July 23, 2015, the Company filed a notice of motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal for Ontario. The appeal was perfected on August 25, 2015 through an additional filing. These charges were in addition to the previous curtailment and contractual termination charges recognized in the third quarter of 2011. There was also a remeasurement of the pension plan for hourly employees during the third quarter of 2014. The discount rateyield curve used to measure the ~~pension~~ benefit obligation ~~was 3.8%~~ at ~~remeasurement, compared~~the beginning of the period. In 2016, we are using a spot rate approach for the estimation of service and interest cost for our major plans by applying specific spot rates along the yield curve to ~~4.1% at October 31, 2013. As~~the relevant projected cash flows, to provide a better estimate of service and interest costs. Interest on the obligation as reported above is $9 million and $4 million lower in the current quarter for pension and for health and life insurance, respectively, as a result of using the ~~plan remeasurement, net actuarial gains of $10 million were recognized as a component of~~ ~~Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)~~ inspot rate approach compared to the ~~third quarter of 2014. See Note 2,~~ ~~Restructurings and Impairments~~ ~~for further discussion.~~

historical approach.

Defined Contribution Plans and Other Contractual Arrangements

Our defined contribution plans cover a substantial portion of domestic salaried employees and certain domestic represented employees. The defined contribution plans contain a 401(k) feature and provide most participants with a matching contribution from the Company. ~~The Company deposits~~We deposit the matching contribution annually. Many participants covered by the plans receive annual Company contributions to their retirement accounts based on an age-weighted percentage of the participant's eligible compensation for the calendar year. Defined contribution expense pursuant to these plans was $7 million and ~~$24~~$9 million in the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, ~~respectively, and $6 million and $21 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014,~~ respectively.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In accordance with the 1993 Settlement Agreement, an independent Retiree Supplemental Benefit Trust (the "Supplemental Trust") was established. The Supplemental Trust, and the benefits it provides to certain retirees pursuant to a certain Retiree Supplemental Benefit Program under the 1993 Settlement Agreement ("Supplemental Benefit Program"), is not part of ~~the Company's~~our consolidated financial statements.

~~The Company's~~Our contingent profit sharing obligations under a certain Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan ("Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan") will continue until certain funding targets defined by the 1993 Settlement Agreement are met. We have recorded no profit sharing accruals based on the operating performance of the entities that are included in the determination of qualifying profits. For more information on pending arbitration regarding the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies~~, for a discussion of pending arbitration regarding the Supplemental Benefit Profit Sharing Plan.~~.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

8. Income Taxes

We compute, on a quarterly basis, an estimated annual effective tax rate considering ordinary income and related income tax expense. For all periods presented, U.S. and certain foreign results are excluded from ordinary income due to ordinary losses for which no benefit can be recognized. Ordinary income refers to income (loss) before income tax expense excluding significant unusual or infrequently occurring items. The tax effect of a significant unusual or infrequently occurring item is recorded in the interim period in which itthe item occurs. Items included in income tax expense in the periods in which they occur include the tax effects of material restructurings, impairments, cumulative effect of changes in tax laws or rates, foreign exchange gains and losses, adjustments to uncertain tax positions, and adjustments to our valuation allowance due to changes in judgment regarding the ability to realize deferred tax assets in future years.

We have reviewed the impact of recently enacted U.S. tax legislation, the most significant of which is the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 ("PATH Act of 2015"), which extended the rules allowing us to forego bonus depreciation in exchange for refunds of previously paid Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT"). This change has resulted in the likely realization of our deferred AMT credits, on a more likely than not basis, which supports the release of the associated valuation allowance. In addition, PATH Act of 2015 extended the "look-through rule," under subpart F of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, which had expired for us on September 30, 2015. The "look-through rule" had provided an exception to the U.S. taxation of certain income generated by foreign subsidiaries. The rule was extended in December 2015 with retroactive effect to the beginning of our 2016 fiscal year, and the rule will remain in place through our 2020 fiscal year. This rule extension will allow us to reverse recently recognized deferred tax liabilities associated with earnings in foreign jurisdictions. However, since the reversal of this deferred tax liability will also have an associated and completely offsetting valuation allowance effect, there is no impact to total deferred taxes due to this change.

In the first quarter of 2016, we elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” This ASU requires the offset of all deferred tax assets and liabilities, including valuation allowances, for each tax-paying jurisdiction within each tax-paying component. The net deferred tax must be presented as a single noncurrent amount for each jurisdiction. In accordance with the adoption of ASU 2015-17 we have chosen to apply this change prospectively, and as a result, prior year amounts are maintained as originally filed.

We have evaluated the need to maintain a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets based on our assessment of whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax benefits will be realized through the generation of future taxable income. Appropriate consideration is given to all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. As mentioned above, we have concluded that the valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred AMT credits is no longer necessary. This partial valuation allowance release resulted in an income tax benefit of $13 million. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance on our remaining U.S. deferred tax assets, as well as certain foreign deferred tax assets, that we believe, on a more-likely-than-not basis, will not be realized. For all remaining deferred tax assets, while we believe at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 that it is more likely than not that they will be realized, ~~we believe that~~ it is reasonably possible that additional deferred tax asset valuation allowances could be required in the next twelve months.

We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the consolidated financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the amount of liability for uncertain tax positions was $41 million. The liability at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 has a recorded offsetting tax benefit associated with various issues that total ~~$14~~$12 million. If the unrecognized tax benefits are recognized, all would impact our effective tax rate. However, to the extent we continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets, the effect may be in the form of an increase in the deferred tax asset related to our net operating loss carryforward, which would be offset by a full valuation allowance.

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of Income tax expense. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, total interest and penalties related to our uncertain tax positions resulted in an income tax expense of less than $1 million, ~~in each period.~~for both periods.

We have open tax years back to 2001 with various significant taxing jurisdictions including the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and Brazil. In connection with the examination of tax returns, contingencies may arise that generally result from differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to the amount, timing, or inclusion of revenues or expenses in taxable income, or the sustainability of tax credits to reduce income taxes payable. We believe we have sufficient accruals for our contingent tax liabilities. Annual tax provisions include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examinations of prior year tax returns, although actual results may differ. While it is probable that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease during the next twelve months, we do not expect any such change would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

2219

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

9. Fair Value Measurements

For assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis, a three-level hierarchy of measurements based upon observable and unobservable inputs is used to arrive at fair value. Observable inputs are developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our assumptions about valuation based on the best information available in the circumstances. Depending on the inputs, we classify each fair value measurement as follows:

Level 1—based upon quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets,

Level 2—based upon quoted prices for similar instruments, prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model-derived valuations, all of whose significant inputs are observable, and

Level 3—based upon one or more significant unobservable inputs.

The following section describes key inputs and assumptions in our valuation methodologies:

Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash Equivalents—We classify highly liquid investments, with an original maturity of 90 days or less, including U.S. Treasury bills, federal agency securities, and commercial paper, as cash equivalents. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments.

Marketable Securities—Our marketable securities portfolios are classified as available-for-sale and primarily include investments in U.S. government securities and commercial paper with an original maturity greater than 90 days. We use quoted prices from active markets to determine fair value.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities—We measure the fair value of derivatives assuming that the unit of account is an individual derivative transaction and that each derivative could be sold or transferred on a stand-alone basis. We classify within Level 2 our derivatives that are traded over-the-counter and valued using internal models based on observable market inputs. In certain cases, market data is not available and we estimate inputs such as in situations where trading in a particular commodity is not active. Measurements based upon these unobservable inputs are classified within Level 3. For more information regarding derivatives, see Note 10, Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts.

Guarantees—We provide certain guarantees of payments and residual values to specific counterparties. Fair value of these guarantees is based upon internally developed models that utilize current market-based assumptions and historical data. We classify these liabilities within Level 3. For more information regarding guarantees, see Note 11, Commitments and Contingencies.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:


	July 31, 2015								October 31, 2014								January 31, 2016								October 31, 2015
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury bills	$	188	$	—	$	—	$	188	$	256	$	—	$	—	$	256	$	44	$	—	$	—	$	44	$	53	$	—	$	—	$	53
Other	105		—		—		105		349		—		—		349		108		—		—		108		106		—		—		106
Derivative financial instruments:
Foreign currency contracts^(A)	—		5		—		5		—		—		—		—		—		1		—		1		—		1		—		1
Interest rate caps^(B)	—		—		—		—		—		1		—		1
Total assets	$	293	$	5	$	—	$	298	$	605	$	1	$	—	$	606	$	152	$	1	$	—	$	153	$	159	$	1	$	—	$	160
Liabilities
Derivative financial instruments:
Commodity forward contracts^(C)	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	4	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	2
Commodity forward contracts^(B)																	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	5	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	2
Foreign currency contracts^(B)																	—		1		—		1		—		2		—		2
Guarantees	—		—		10		10		—		—		8		8		—		—		10		10		—		—		10		10
Total liabilities	$	—	$	4	$	10	$	14	$	—	$	2	$	8	$	10	$	—	$	6	$	10	$	16	$	—	$	4	$	10	$	14

_________________________


(A)	The asset value of foreign currency contracts ~~are~~is included in other current assets as of ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015 in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.


(B)	The ~~asset~~liability value of ~~interest rate caps are~~commodity forward contracts and foreign currency contracts is included in other ~~noncurrent assets~~current liabilities as of January 31, 2016 and October 31, ~~2014~~2015 in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.


~~(C)~~	~~The liability value of commodity forward contracts are included in other noncurrent liabilities as of July 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014 in the accompanying~~ ~~Consolidated Balance Sheets.~~

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The following table presents the changes for those financial instruments classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:

Three Months Ended July 31,
(in millions) 2015
2014
Guarantees, at May 1 $ (7 )
$ (6 )
Transfers out of Level 3 —

—
Issuances (4 )
—
Settlements 1

—
Guarantees, at July 31 $ (10 )
$ (6 )
Change in unrealized gains on assets and liabilities still held $ —

$ —


	Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2016			2015
Guarantees, at November 1	$	(8	)	$	(6	)	$	(10	)	$	(8	)
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—			—			—
Issuances	(4		)	—			(1		)	—
Settlements	2			—			1			—
Guarantees, at July 31	$	(10	)	$	(6	)
Change in unrealized gains on assets and liabilities still held	$	—		$	—
Guarantees, at January 31							$	(10	)	$	(8	)
Change in unrealized gains on assets (liabilities) still held							$	—		$	—

The following table presents the financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:


(in millions)	July 31, 2015			October 31, 2014			January 31, 2016			October 31, 2015
Level 2 financial instruments
Carrying value of impaired finance receivables ^(A)	$	21		$	20		$	19		$	21
Specific loss reserve	(10		)	(6		)	(12		)	(9		)
Fair value	$	11		$	14		$	7		$	12

_________________________

(A)

Certain impaired finance receivables are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. An impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the receivables exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral, net of remarketing costs. Fair values of the underlying collateral are determined by reference to dealer vehicle value publications adjusted for certain market factors.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In the second quarter of 2014, for the purpose of impairment evaluation the Company measured the implied fair value of the Company's Brazilian engine reporting unit's goodwill and the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset, a trademark. The Company's Brazilian engine reporting unit's goodwill was determined to be fully impaired and resulted in a non-cash charge of $142 million. In addition, the related trademark, with a carrying value of $43 million was determined to be impaired and a non-cash charge of $7 million was recognized. The impairment charges were included in ~~Asset impairment charges~~ ~~in the Company's~~ ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations. We utilized the income approach to determine the fair value of these Level 3 assets. For more information, see Note 1,~~ ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~.

In the first quarter of 2014, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets in the Truck segment. As a result, certain amortizing intangible assets and long-lived assets with a carrying value of $18 million were determined to be fully impaired, resulting in an impairment charge of $18 million, which was included in ~~Asset impairment charges~~ ~~in the Company's~~ ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations. We utilized the market approach to determine the fair values of these Level 2 assets.~~

In addition to the methods and assumptions we use for the financial instruments recorded at fair value as discussed above, we use the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value for our other financial instruments that are not marked to market on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash, and Accounts payable approximate fair values because of the short-term maturity and highly liquid nature of these instruments. Finance receivables generally consist of retail and wholesale accounts and retail and wholesale notes. The carrying amounts of Trade and other receivables and retail and wholesale accounts approximate fair values as a result of the short-term nature of the receivables. The carrying amounts of wholesale notes approximate fair values as a result of the short-term nature of the wholesale notes and their variable interest rate terms. ~~The fair values of these financial instruments are classified as Level 1.~~ Due to the nature of the aforementioned financial instruments, they have been excluded from the fair value amounts presented in the table below.

The fair values of our retail notes are estimated by discounting expected cash flows at estimated current market rates. The fair values of our retail notes are classified as Level 3 financial instruments.

The fair values of our debt instruments classified as Level 1 were determined using quoted market prices. The 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040, are traded, but the trading market is illiquid, and as a result, the Loan Agreement underlying the Tax Exempt Bonds is classified as Level 2. The fair values of our Level 3 debt instruments are generally determined using internally developed valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow modeling. Inputs such as discount rates and credit spreads reflect our estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument and may be unobservable.

2521

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The following tables present the carrying values and estimated fair values of financial instruments:


	As of July 31, 2015										As of January 31, 2016
	Estimated Fair Value								Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value								Carrying Value
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total				Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Retail notes	$	—	$	—	$	195	$	195	$	188	$	—	$	—	$	145	$	145	$	143
Notes receivable	—		—		5		5		5		—		—		2		2		2
Liabilities
Debt:
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017	—		—		697		697		695
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2020											—		—		910		910		1,024
8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021	1,150		—		—		1,150		1,182		750		—		—		750		1,183
4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018^(A)	—		—		166		166		184		—		—		95		95		187
4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019^(A)	—		—		333		333		377		—		—		172		172		381
Debt of majority-owned dealerships	—		—		26		26		26		—		—		20		20		20
Financing arrangements	—		—		19		19		44		—		—		14		14		41
Loan Agreement related to 6.50% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040	—		—		243		243		225		—		220		—		220		225
Promissory Note	—		—		3		3		3
Financed lease obligations	—		—		129		129		129		—		—		91		91		91
Other	—		—		20		20		19		—		—		14		14		15
Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2018	—		—		1,129		1,129		1,135
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2015 through 2020	—		—		1,127		1,127		1,147
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2021											—		—		780		780		784
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2016 through 2020											—		—		969		969		981
Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2017	90		—		—		90		90		74		—		—		74		74
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2018	—		—		26		26		26
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2020											—		—		88		88		88

2622

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)


	As of October 31, 2014										As of October 31, 2015
	Estimated Fair Value								Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value								Carrying Value
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total				Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Retail notes	$	—	$	—	$	279	$	279	$	275	$	—	$	—	$	170	$	170	$	166
Notes receivable	—		—		7		7		8		—		—		3		3		3
Liabilities
Debt:
Manufacturing operations
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2017	—		—		704		704		694
Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, as Amended, due 2020											—		—		1,014		1,014		1,023
8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021	1,285		—		—		1,285		1,180		998		—		—		998		1,182
4.50% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2018^(A)	—		—		196		196		181		—		—		148		148		186
4.75% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes, due 2019^(A)	—		—		413		413		371		—		—		289		289		379
Debt of majority-owned dealerships	—		—		30		30		30		—		—		28		28		28
Financing arrangements	—		—		22		22		48		—		—		17		17		43
Loan Agreement related to 6.50% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040	—		232		—		232		225		—		233		—		233		225
Promissory Note	—		—		10		10		10
Financed lease obligations	—		—		184		184		184		—		—		111		111		111
Other	—		—		28		28		29		—		—		17		17		15
Financial Services operations
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2019	—		—		911		911		914
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2014 through 2020	—		—		1,214		1,214		1,242
Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2015	74		—		—		74		74
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2018	—		—		36		36		36
Asset-backed debt issued by consolidated SPEs, at various rates, due serially through 2018											—		—		865		865		870
Bank revolvers, at fixed and variable rates, due dates from 2016 through 2020											—		—		1,048		1,048		1,063
Commercial paper, at variable rates, program matures in 2017											86		—		—		86		86
Borrowings secured by operating and finance leases, at various rates, due serially through 2020											—		—		80		80		81

_________________________


(A)	The carrying value represents the consolidated financial statement amount of the debt which excludes the allocation of the conversion feature to equity, while the fair value is based on internally developed valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow modeling for Level 3 convertible notes which include the equity feature.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

10. Financial Instruments and Commodity Contracts

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments as part of our overall interest rate, foreign currency, and commodity risk management strategies to reduce our interest rate exposure, reduce exchange rate risk for transactional exposures denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, and minimize the effect of commodity price volatility. From time to time, we use foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage the risk of exchange rate movements that would affect the value of our foreign currency cash flows. Foreign currency exchange rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the value of sales made and costs incurred in currencies other than the functional currency. In addition, we also use commodity forward contracts to manage our exposure to variability in certain commodity prices.

We generally do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes and did not during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~2015. None of our derivatives qualified for hedge accounting treatment during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~2015.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

The majority of our derivative contracts are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") master agreements. Each agreement permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of default or certain other termination events. For derivative financial instruments, we have elected not to offset derivative positions in the balance sheet with the same counterparty under the same agreement. ~~Certain~~Collateral is generally not required to be provided by our counter-parties for derivative contracts. However, certain of our derivative contracts contain provisions that require us to provide collateral if certain loss thresholds are exceeded. Collateral of $1$3 million was provided ~~at July~~as of January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and no$1 million of collateral was provided as of October 31, ~~2014. Collateral is generally not required to be provided by our counter-parties for derivative contracts.~~2015. We manage exposure to counter-party credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with various major financial institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such instruments. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any of the counter-parties. Our exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counter-parties is limited to those assets that have been recorded, but have not yet been received in cash. At ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, our exposure to the credit risk of others was $5$2 million and $1 million, respectively.

Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended July 31,
(in millions)
2015
2014
Interest rate caps Interest expense
$ 1

$ 1
Cross currency swaps Other income, net
(1 )
1
Foreign currency contracts Other income, net
(6 )
1
Commodity forward contracts Costs of products sold
(1 )
(1 )
Total (income) loss
$ (7 )
$ 2

Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions) 2015 2014
Interest rate caps Interest expense $ 1
$ 2
Cross currency swaps Other income, net 2
1
Foreign currency contracts Other income, net (5 ) 2
Commodity forward contracts Costs of products sold 4
(1 )
Total loss $ 2
$ 4

The following table presents the location and amount of loss (gain) recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations related to derivatives:



		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations	2016			2015
Cross currency swaps	Other income, net	$	—		$	2
Foreign currency contracts	Other income, net	(1		)	1
Commodity forward contracts	Costs of products sold	5			10
Total loss		$	4		$	13

Foreign Currency Contracts

During ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we entered into foreign exchange forward and option contracts as economic hedges of anticipated cash flows denominated in Brazilian Reais, Euros, Canadian Dollars, and Mexican Pesos. All contracts were entered into to protect against the risk that the eventual cash flows resulting from certain transactions would be affected by changes in exchange rates between the U.S. Dollar and the respective foreign currency.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following table presents the outstanding foreign currency contracts as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014:~~2015:



(in millions)	Currency	Notional Amount		Maturity
As of ~~July~~January 31, 2016
Forward exchange contract	EUR	€	24	February 2016 - October 2016^(A)
Forward exchange contract	MXN	₱	889	February 2016^(B)
As of October 31, 2015
Forward exchange contract	EUR	€	1230	~~August 2015-October~~November 2015 - October 2016^(A)(C)
Forward exchange contract	CAD	C$	~~100~~25	~~August 2015-October~~November 2015^(B)
Forward exchange contract	MXN	₱	~~813~~	~~August 2015~~
~~As of October 31, 2014~~
~~Forward exchange contract~~	~~EUR~~	€	41,270	November ~~2014~~
~~Forward exchange contract~~	~~EUR~~	€	4	~~December 2014~~
~~Forward exchange contract~~	~~EUR~~	€	5	~~January~~ 2015
~~Forward exchange contract~~	~~EUR~~	€	9	~~February 2015 - October 2015~~^(C)

_________________________

(A) Forward exchange contracts of €2 million settled in February 2016, €3 million matured in February 2016, €4 million mature in March 2016, €3 million mature in April 2016, and €2 million mature each month from ~~August 2015~~May 2016 through October ~~2015.~~2016.

(B) Forward exchange contracts of ~~C$25~~₱431 million ~~settle each month from August 2015 through November 2015.~~matured in January 2016 but settled in February 2016 and ₱458 million matured and settled in February 2016.

(C) Forward exchange contracts of €1€2 million settled in November 2015, €3 million matured in November 2015, €3 million matured in December 2015, €4 million matured in January 2016, and €2 million mature ~~on the last day of~~ each month from February ~~2015~~2016 through October ~~2015.~~2016.

Commodity Forward Contracts

During ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we entered into commodity forward contracts as economic hedges of our exposure to variability in commodity prices for diesel fuel and steel. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016, we had outstanding diesel fuel contracts with aggregate notional values of $1326 million and outstanding steel contracts with aggregate notional values of $612 million. The commodity forward contracts have various maturity dates through ~~October~~December 31, 2016. As of October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we had outstanding diesel fuel contracts with aggregate notional values of $24 million and outstanding steel contracts with aggregate notional values of ~~$23~~$6 million. All of these contracts were entered into to protect against the risk that the eventual cash flows related to purchases of the commodities will be affected by changes in prices.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Interest-Rate Contracts

From time to time, we enter into various interest-rate contracts, interest rate caps, and cross currency swaps. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015, there were no outstanding cross currency swaps. As of~~ ~~October 31, 2014~~2016, the notional amount of our outstanding cross currency swaps was $28 million. As of ~~$27 million~~October 31, 2015., there were no outstanding cross currency swaps. We are exposed to interest rate and exchange rate risk as a result of our borrowing activities. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate fluctuations in earnings, cash flows, and fair value of borrowings. Our Mexican financial services operation uses interest rate caps and cross currency swaps to protect against the potential of rising interest rates as required by the terms of its variable-rate asset-backed securities, and fluctuations in the value of the peso, as required under our Mexican bank credit facilities. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the notional amount of our outstanding interest rate caps at our Mexican financial services operation was ~~$111~~$133 million and ~~$134~~$108 million, respectively.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Guarantees

We occasionally provide guarantees that could obligate us to make future payments if the primary entity fails to perform under its contractual obligations. We have recognized liabilities for some of these guarantees in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as they meet the recognition and measurement provisions of U.S. GAAP. In addition to the liabilities that have been recognized, we are contingently liable for other potential losses under various guarantees. We do not believe that claims that may be made under such guarantees would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

In March 2010, we entered into an operating agreement ~~as amended,~~with GE Capital which contains automatic extensions and is subject to early termination provisions ~~with~~(the "Navistar Capital Operating Agreement"). Effective December 1, 2015, GE Capital ~~(the "GE~~assigned the Navistar Capital Operating ~~Agreement"~~Agreement to BMO Financial Group and its wholly-owned subsidiary BMO Harris Bank N.A. (together “BMO”). as part of General Electric’s sale of its GE Transportation Finance business. Under the terms of the GENavistar Capital Operating Agreement, ~~as amended,~~ GE Capital ~~("GE") is~~has been, and going forward BMO will be, our third-party preferred source of retail customer financing for equipment offered by us and our dealers in the U.S. We ~~provide GE with~~refer to this alliance as "Navistar Capital." The Navistar Capital Operating Agreement contains a loss sharing arrangement for certain credit losses. Under the loss sharing arrangement, as amended, we generally reimburse GEour financing partner for credit losses in excess of the first 10% of the financed value of a contract; for certain leases we reimburse GEour financing partner for credit losses up to a maximum of the first 9.5% of the financed value of those lease contracts. ~~The Company’s~~Our exposure to loss is mitigated because contracts under the GENavistar Capital Operating Agreement are secured by the financed equipment. There were ~~$1.7 billion and $1.5~~$1.4 billion of outstanding loan principal and operating lease payments receivable at ~~July~~both January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, financed through the GENavistar Capital Operating Agreement and subject to the loss sharing arrangements in the U.S. The related financed values of these outstanding contracts were $2.4 billion and $2.3 billion at ~~both~~

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014.~~2015, respectively. Generally, we do not carry the contracts under the GENavistar Capital Operating Agreement on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. However, for certain GENavistar Capital financed contracts which we have accounted for as borrowings, we have recognized equipment leased to others of ~~$119~~$84 million and financed lease obligations of ~~$128~~$91 million in our Consolidated Balance Sheets ~~for the period ended July~~as of January 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Historically, our losses, representing the entire loss amount, on similar contracts, measured as a percentage of the average balance of the related contracts, ranged from 0.3% to 2.1%. Under limited circumstances NFC retains the right to originate retail customer financings. Based on our historic experience of losses on similar contracts and the nature of the loss sharing arrangement, we do not believe our share of losses related to balances currently outstanding will be material.

For certain independent dealers’ wholesale inventory financed by third-party banks or finance companies, we provide limited repurchase agreements to the respective financing institution. The amount of losses related to these arrangements has not been material to our ~~Consolidated Statements of Operations~~ or ~~Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows~~ ~~and the value of the guarantees and accruals recorded are not material to our~~ ~~Consolidated Balance Sheets~~.

We also have issued limited residual value guarantees in connection with various leases. The amounts of the guarantees are estimated and recorded. Our guarantees are contingent upon the fair value of the leased assets at the end of the lease term. The amount of losses related to these arrangements has not been material to our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and the value of the guarantees and accruals recorded are not material to our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We obtain certain stand-by letters of credit and surety bonds from third-party financial institutions in the ordinary course of business when required under contracts or to satisfy insurance-related requirements. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the amount of stand-by letters of credit and surety bonds was $88 million.

We extend credit commitments to certain truck fleet customers, which allow them to purchase parts and services from participating dealers. The participating dealers receive accelerated payments from us with the result that we carry the receivables and absorb the credit risk related to these customers. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the total credit limit under this program was $11 million of which $7$8 million was unused.

In addition, as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we have entered into various purchase commitments of ~~$58~~$15 million and contracts that have cancellation fees of ~~$59~~$51 million with various expiration dates through 2020.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In the ordinary course of business, we also provide routine indemnifications and other guarantees, the terms of which range in duration and often are not explicitly defined. We do not believe these will result in claims that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Environmental Liabilities

We have been named a potentially responsible party ("PRP"), in conjunction with other parties, in a number of cases arising under an environmental protection law, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, popularly known as the "Superfund" law. These cases involve sites that allegedly received wastes from current or former Company locations. Based on information available to us which, in most cases, consists of data related to quantities and characteristics of material generated at current or former Company locations, material allegedly shipped by us to these disposal sites, as well as cost estimates from PRPs and/or federal or state regulatory agencies for the cleanup of these sites, a reasonable estimate is calculated of our share of the probable costs, if any, and accruals are recorded in our consolidated financial statements. These accruals are generally recognized no later than upon completion of the remedial feasibility study and are not discounted to their present value. We review all accruals on a regular basis and believe that, based on these calculations, our share of the potential additional costs for the cleanup of each site will not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Two sites formerly owned by us, Solar Turbines in San Diego, California, and the Canton Plant in Canton, Illinois, were identified as having soil and groundwater contamination. Two sites in Sao Paulo, Brazil, one at which we are currently operating and one where we formerly operated, were identified as having soil and groundwater contamination. While investigations and cleanup activities continue at these and other sites, we believe that we have adequate accruals to cover costs to complete the cleanup of all sites.

We have accrued ~~$21~~$23 million for these and other environmental matters, which are included within Other current liabilities and Other noncurrent liabilities, as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The majority of these accrued liabilities are expected to be paid subsequent to ~~2015.~~2017.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Along with other vehicle manufacturers, we have been subject to an increased number of asbestos-related claims in recent years. In general, these claims relate to illnesses alleged to have resulted from asbestos exposure from component parts found in older vehicles, although some cases relate to the alleged presence of asbestos in our facilities. In these claims, we are generally not the sole defendant, and the claims name as defendants numerous manufacturers and suppliers of a wide variety of products allegedly containing asbestos. We have strongly disputed these claims, and it has been our policy to defend against them vigorously. Historically, the actual damages paid out to claimants have not been material in any year to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. It is possible that the number of these claims will continue to grow, and that the costs for resolving asbestos related claims could become significant in the future.

Legal Proceedings

Overview

We are subject to various claims arising in the ordinary course of business, and are party to various legal proceedings that constitute ordinary, routine litigation incidental to our business. The majority of these claims and proceedings relate to commercial, product liability, and warranty matters. In addition, from time to time we are subject to various claims and legal proceedings related to employee compensation, benefits, and benefits administration including, but not limited to, compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"), and Department of Labor requirements. In our opinion, apart from the actions set forth below, the disposition of these proceedings and claims, after taking into account recorded accruals and the availability and limits of our insurance coverage, will not have a material adverse effect on our business or our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Profit Sharing Disputes

Pursuant to the 1993 Settlement Agreement, the program administrator and named fiduciary of the Supplemental Benefit Program is the Supplemental Benefit Program committee (the "Committee"), comprised of non-Company individuals. In August 2013, the Committee filed a motion for leave to amend its February 2013 complaint (which sought injunctive relief for the Company to provide certain information to which it was allegedly entitled under the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan) and a proposed amended complaint (the "Profit Sharing Complaint") in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (the "Court"). Leave to file the Profit Sharing Complaint was granted by the Court in October 2013. In its Profit Sharing Complaint, the Committee alleged the Company breached the 1993 Settlement Agreement and violated ERISA by failing to properly calculate profit sharing contributions due under the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. The Committee seeks damages in excess of $50 million, injunctive relief and reimbursement of attorneys' fees and costs.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In October 2013, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss the Profit Sharing Complaint and to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution procedures set forth in the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. In March 2014, the Court denied the Company's Motion to Dismiss and ruled, among other things, that the Company waived its right to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution provisions set forth in the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. In April 2014, the Company appealed the Court's refusal to compel the Committee to comply with the dispute resolution process to the Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. The Company also filed a motion with the Court to stay all proceedings pending the appeal. In May 2014, the Court granted the motion to stay all proceedings, including discovery, pending the appeal. In March 2015, the 6^thCircuit Court of Appeals ~~vacated~~remanded the ~~Court's March 2014 denial of~~case to the ~~Company's Motion to Dismiss and related ruling and remanded~~Court with instructions ~~to order~~ that the ~~Committee's~~Committee’s claims in the Profit Sharing Complaint be arbitrated. In May 2015, the Court ordered that the claims in the Profit Sharing Complaint be arbitrated pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures in the Supplemental Benefit Trust Profit Sharing Plan. ~~The~~In November 2015, the Company and the Committee ~~are in the~~selected an arbitrator. The discovery process ~~of selecting an arbitrator.~~has commenced.

In addition, various local bargaining units of the ~~UAW~~United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America ("UAW") have filed separate grievances pursuant to the profit sharing plans under various collective bargaining agreements in effect between the Company and the UAW that may have similar legal and factual issues as the Profit Sharing Complaint.

Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the claims in the above actions, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of these claims may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

FATMA Notice

International Indústria de Motores da América do Sul Ltda. ("IIAA"), formerly known as Maxion International Motores S/A ("Maxion"), now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, received a notice in July 2010 from the State of Santa Catarina Environmental Protection Agency ("FATMA") in Brazil. The notice alleged that Maxion had sent wastes to a facility owned and operated by a company known as Natureza and that soil and groundwater contamination had occurred at the Natureza facility. The notice asserted liability against Maxion and assessed an initial penalty in the amount of R$2 million (the equivalent of approximately less than US$1 million at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015)~~2016), which is not due and final until all administrative appeals are exhausted. Maxion was one of numerous companies that received similar notices. IIAA filed an administrative defense in August 2010 and has not yet received a decision following that filing. IIAA disputes the allegations in the notice and intends to vigorously defend itself.

Sao Paulo Groundwater Notice

In March 2014, IIAA, along with other nearby companies, received from the Sao Paulo District Attorney a notice and proposed Consent Agreement relating to alleged neighborhood-wide groundwater contamination at or around its Sao Paulo manufacturing facility. The proposed Consent Agreement seeks certain groundwater investigations and other technical relief and proposes sanctions in the amount of R$3 million (the equivalent of approximately US$1 million at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015)~~2016). In November 2014, IIAA extended a settlement offer. Currently, the parties remain in settlement discussions concerning the sanctions amount and the provisions of a Consent Agreement.

MaxxForce Engine EGR Warranty Litigation

On June 24, 2014, N&C Transportation Ltd. ~~("N&C")~~ filed a putative class action lawsuit against ~~NIC,~~Navistar International Corporation, Navistar, Inc., Navistar Canada Inc., and Harbour International Trucks (collectively, "Navistar") in Canada in the Supreme Court of British Columbia (the "N&C Action"). Subsequently, six additional, similar putative class action lawsuits have been filed in ~~four other provinces in~~ Canada (together with the N&C Action, the "Canadian Actions"). ~~On July~~A certification hearing is scheduled in the N&C Action starting on June 13, ~~2015, N&C~~2016. The plaintiff submitted application materials for the certification motion, and Navistar's responding materials were filed ~~a Notice~~on December 4, 2015. There are no court dates scheduled in any of ~~Application seeking an order certifying a nationwide class of~~the other Canadian ~~residents who purchased in or after January 2009 a Class 8 Navistar truck equipped with an “Advanced EGR” engine.~~Actions at this time.

On July 7, 2014, Par 4 Transport, LLC filed a putative class action lawsuit against Navistar, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the "Par 4 Action"). Subsequently, ~~similar~~sixteen additional putative class action lawsuits were filed in various United States district courts, including the Northern District of Illinois, the Eastern District of Wisconsin, the Southern District of Florida, the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the Southern District of Texas, the ~~District of Minnesota, the Northern District of Alabama, the~~ Western District of Kentucky, the District of Minnesota, and the ~~Middle~~ District of ~~Pennsylvania~~Alabama (together with the Par 4 Action, the "U.S. Actions"). Some of the U.S. Actions name both Navistar International Corporation and Navistar, Inc. The U.S. Actions ~~contained allegations~~allege matters substantially similar to the Canadian Actions. More specifically, the Canadian Actions and the U.S. Actions (collectively, the "EGR Class Actions") seek to certify ~~one or more classes~~a class of persons or entities in Canada or the United States who purchased and/or leased a ProStar or other Navistar vehicle equipped with a model year 2008-2013 MaxxForce Advanced EGR engine.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In substance, the EGR Class Actions allege that the MaxxForce Advanced EGR engines are defective and that the Company and Navistar, Inc. failed to disclose ~~and/or~~and correct the alleged defect. The EGR Class Actions assert claims based on ~~various~~ theories ~~including breach~~ of contract, breach of warranty, consumer fraud, unfair competition, misrepresentation and negligence. The EGR Class Actions seek relief in the form of monetary damages, punitive damages, declaratory relief, interest, fees, and costs.

On October 3, 2014, ~~NIC~~Navistar International Corporation and Navistar, Inc. filed a motion before the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the "MDL Panel") seeking to transfer and consolidate before Judge Joan B. Gottschall of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois all of the then-pending U.S. Actions, ~~then pending,~~ as well as certain non-class action MaxxForce Advanced EGR engine lawsuits pending in various federal district courts.

On December 17, 2014, Navistar's motion to consolidate the U.S. Actions and certain other non-class action lawsuits was granted. The MDL Panel issued an order consolidating all of the U.S. Actions that were pending on the date ~~the~~of Navistar’s motion ~~was filed~~ before Judge Gottschall in the United States District Court for the Northern District of ~~Illinois.~~Illinois (the "MDL Action"). The MDL Panel also consolidated into the MDL Action certain non-class action MaxxForce Advanced EGR engine lawsuits pending in the various federal district courts, with the exception of one matter.

For ~~cases~~putative class action lawsuits filed ~~after the initial ruling by the MDL Panel,~~subsequent to Navistar’s original motion, we continue to request that the MDL Panel similarly transfer and consolidate ~~cases involving one or more common questions~~these U.S. Actions.

At the request of ~~fact. To date, eight putative class actions and three non-class cases have been added to~~the various law firms representing the plaintiffs in the MDL ~~proceeding before Judge Gottschall. On~~Action, on March 5, 2015, Judge Gottschall entered an order in the MDL ~~proceeding,~~Action appointing interim lead counsel and interim liaison counsel for the ~~Plaintiffs.~~plaintiffs. On May 11, 2015, lead counsel for the ~~Plaintiffs~~plaintiffs filed a First Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint ("Consolidated Complaint"). The parties to the MDL Action exchanged initial disclosures on May 29, 2015. The Company answered the Consolidated Complaint on July 13, 2015. ~~The next status conference is set for September 11, 2015.~~

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

EPA Clean Air Act Litigation

In February 2012, Navistar, Inc. received a Notice of Violation ("NOV") from the ~~U.S.~~United States Environmental Protection Agency ~~("EPA"~~(the "EPA")~~. The NOV pertains~~ pertaining to ~~approximately 7,600~~certain heavy-duty diesel engines which, according to ~~the~~ EPA, were ~~produced~~not completely assembled by Navistar, Inc. inuntil calendar year 2010 and, therefore, ~~should have met the EPA's 2010 emissions standards.~~were not covered by Navistar, Inc. ~~previously provided information to the EPA evidencing its belief that the engines were in fact produced in 2009.~~'s model year 2009 certificates of conformity. The NOV ~~contains the EPA's conclusion~~concluded that Navistar, Inc.'s ~~alleged production~~introduction into commerce of ~~the~~each of these engines ~~in 2010~~ violated the Federal Clean Air Act. The NOV states that the EPA reserves the right to file an administrative complaint or to refer this matter to the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") with a recommendation that a civil complaint be filed in federal district court. In July 2014, the DOJ informed Navistar that the matter had been referred to the DOJ.

On July 14, 2015, the ~~DOJ~~Department of Justice ("DOJ"), on behalf of the EPA, filed a lawsuit against the Company and Navistar, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of ~~Illinois alleging~~Illinois. Similar to the NOV, the lawsuit alleges that ~~during 2010~~ the Company and Navistar, Inc. introduced into commerce approximately ~~7,750~~7,749 heavy-duty diesel engines that ~~did~~were not ~~meet the EPA’s emissions standards applicable to~~covered by model year 2009 certificates of conformity because those engines were not completely assembled until calendar year 2010, ~~engines,~~ resulting in violations of the ~~federal~~Federal Clean Air Act. On July 16, 2015, the DOJ filed an Amended Complaint clarifying the amount of civil penalties being sought. The lawsuit requests injunctive relief and the assessment of civil penalties of up to $37,500 for each violation. On September 14, 2015, the Company and Navistar, Inc. each filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Amended Complaint. On December 1, 2015, the Court entered an order setting a discovery schedule. Discovery in the matter will proceed in two phases. Fact discovery for the liability phase commenced on December 9, 2015, and is scheduled to be completed on August 9, 2016, followed by expert discovery. The deadline for dispositive motions is January 20, 2017. After completion of the first phase, the Court will, if necessary, set further dates for a remedy phase. The Company ~~disputes~~and Navistar, Inc. dispute the allegations in the lawsuit.

Based on our assessment of the facts underlying the complaint above, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of this matter may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

~~CARB Notice of Violation~~

~~In April 2013,~~

Navistar ~~Inc. received a notice of violation~~International Corporation and ~~proposed settlement ("Notice") from the California Air Resources Board ("CARB"). The Notice alleged violations of the California regulations relating~~Subsidiaries

Notes to verification of after-treatment devices and proposed civil penalties of approximately $2.5 million, among other proposed settlement terms. In May 2015, the parties finalized a settlement resolving the matter for a penalty payment of $0.3 million and the Company's agreement to conduct certain in-use testing.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Shareholder Litigation

In March 2013, a putative class action complaint, alleging securities fraud, was filed against us by the Construction Workers Pension Trust Fund - Lake County and Vicinity, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of November 3, 2010 and August 1, 2012. A second class action complaint was filed in April 2013 by the Norfolk County Retirement System, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of June 9, 2010 and August 1, 2012. A third class action complaint was filed in April 2013 by Jane C. Purnell FBO Purnell Family Trust, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated purchasers of our common stock between the period of November 3, 2010 and August 1, 2012. Each complaint named us as well as Daniel C. Ustian, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, and Andrew J. Cederoth, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer as defendants. These complaints (collectively, the "10b-5 Cases") contain similar factual allegations which include, among other things, that we violated the federal securities laws by knowingly issuing materially false and misleading statements concerning our financial condition and future business prospects and that we misrepresented and omitted material facts in filings with the ~~SEC~~U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC") concerning the timing and likelihood of EPA certification of our EGR technology to meet 2010 EPA emission standards. The plaintiffs in these matters seek compensatory damages and attorneys' fees, among other relief.

In May 2013, an order was entered transferring and consolidating all ~~cases~~10b-5 Cases before one judge sitting in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and in July 2013, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead plaintiff's counsel. The lead plaintiff filed a ~~consolidated amended complaint~~Consolidated Amended Complaint in October 2013. The ~~consolidated amended complaint~~Consolidated Amended Complaint enlarged the proposed class period to June 9, 2009 through August 1, 2012, and named fourteen additional current and former directors and officers as defendants. InOn December 17, 2013, wedefendants filed a motion to dismiss the ~~consolidated amended complaint. In~~Consolidated Amended Complaint. On July 22, 2014, the Court granted the defendants' ~~Motions~~Motion to Dismiss, denied the lead plaintiff's Motion to Strike as moot, and gave the lead plaintiff leave to file a second consolidated amended ~~complaint. In~~complaint by August 22, 2014.

On August 22, 2014, the plaintiff ~~timely~~ filed a Second Amended Complaint, which ~~narrows~~narrowed the claims in two ways. First, the plaintiff abandoned its claims against the majority of the ~~defendants, asserting~~defendants. The Second Amended Complaint brought claims against only Navistar, Dan Ustian, A.J. Cederoth, Jack Allen, and Eric Tech. The plaintiff also shortened the putative class ~~period by changing~~period. In the prior complaint, the class period ~~commencement date from~~began on June 9, ~~2009 to~~2009. In the Second Amended Complaint, it begins on March 10, 2010. Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint inon September ~~2014 and in October, 2014, the plaintiff filed its opposition to defendants' Motion to Dismiss.~~23, 2014. In

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~November, 2014, defendants filed their reply brief in support of defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. Also in~~ November 2014, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Eric Tech as a defendant.

On July 10, 2015, the Court issued its Opinion and Order on our Motion to Dismiss the ~~Defendants’~~ Second Amended ~~Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases.~~Complaint. The Motion to Dismiss was granted in part and denied in part.

Specifically, the Court (i) dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims against the Company, Andrew J. Cederoth and Jack Allen and (ii) dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims against Daniel C. Ustian, the only remaining defendant, except for claims regarding two of Mr. Ustian’s statements. Further, all of the dismissed claims were dismissed with prejudice except for claims based on statements made subsequent to the lead plaintiff’s last purchase of the Company’s stock (the “Post-Purchase Claims”). The Court determined the lead plaintiff lacked standing to assert the Post-Purchase Claims and dismissed those claims without prejudice. At a December 1, 2015 status conference, the parties reported that a settlement in principle had been reached, subject to, among other things, final documentation, confirmatory discovery and Court approval, and the Court filed a minute entry reflecting such report. At a February 2, 2016 status conference, the parties reported on the status of settlement documentation and confirmatory discovery and the Court set a new status conference for April 5, 2016.

In March 2013, James Gould filed a derivative complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of the Company against us and certain of our current and former directors and former officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of our current and former directors and former officers committed a breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets and were unjustly enriched in relation to similar factual allegations made in the 10b-5 Cases. The plaintiff in this matter seeks compensatory damages, certain corporate governance reforms, certain injunctive relief, disgorgement of the proceeds of certain defendants' profits from the sale of Company stock, and attorneys' fees, among other relief. On May 3, 2013, the ~~Court~~court entered a Stipulation and Order to Stay Action, staying the case pending further order of the court or entry of an order on the motion to dismiss the ~~consolidated amended complaint~~Consolidated Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases. On July 31, 2014, after the amended complaint ~~in the 10b-5 Cases~~ was dismissed, the parties filed a status report, and the court entered an order on August 27, 2014 continuing the stay pending a ruling on defendants' ~~Motion~~motion to ~~Dismiss~~dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases. In ~~July~~November 2015, the existing stay order in this derivative action was further extended through ~~November 23, 2015.~~March 22, 2016.

~~Each of these matters is pending in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois.~~

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

In August 2013, Abbie Griffin filed a derivative complaint in the State of Delaware Court of Chancery, on behalf of the Company ~~and all similarly situated stockholders,~~ against ~~the Company, as the nominal defendant,~~us and certain of our current and former directors and former officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of our current and former directors and former officers committed a breach of fiduciary duty, in relation to similar factual allegations made in the 10b-5 Cases. The plaintiff in this matter seeks compensatory damages, certain corporate governance reforms, certain injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees, among other relief. On August 29, 2013, the court entered an order staying the case pending resolution of the defendant's ~~Motion~~motion to ~~Dismiss~~dismiss the ~~consolidated amended complaint~~Consolidated Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases. On August 5, 2014, the parties filed a status report with the court requesting that the August 2013 stay order remain in place pending a ruling on ~~defendant's Motion~~the motion to ~~Dismiss~~dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases and on November 9, 2014, the court entered an order continuing the stay pending a ruling on defendants’ ~~Motion~~motion to ~~Dismiss~~dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases. In ~~July~~August 2015, the ~~stay was~~court further extended the stay of this derivative action through December 3, 2015. In November 2015, the court further extended the stay through March 23, 2016.

Based on our assessment of the facts underlying these matters described above, we are unable to provide meaningful quantification of how the final resolution of these matters may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Brazil Truck Dealer Disputes

In January 2014, IIAA initiated an arbitration proceeding under the International Chamber of Commerce rules seeking payment for goods sold and unpaid, in the amount of R$64 million (approximately US$16 million as of January 31, 2016), including penalties and interest, from a group of ~~four~~affiliated truck dealers in Brazil. The truck dealers are affiliated with each other, but not with us, and are collectively referred to as Navitrucks. In the proceeding, IIAA also seeks a declaration of fault against Navitrucks related to the termination of the truck dealer agreements between IIAA and Navitrucks. Navitrucks responded in part by submitting counterclaims against IIAA seeking the amount of R$128 million (approximately US$32 million as of January 31, 2016) for damages related to alleged unfulfilled promises and injury to Navitrucks’ reputation. In October 2014, Navitrucks amended their counterclaims by increasing the amount of damages. During a preliminary hearing before the arbitral tribunal on March 24, 2015, the parties agreed to submit all of the pending claims between the parties to the exclusive jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. Pursuant to the timetable issued in the arbitration proceeding, IIAA presented its complaint in July 2015, Navitrucks filed its answer and counterclaims on August 24, 2015, and IIAA ~~will file~~filed its rebuttal and answer to ~~any~~Navitrucks’ counterclaims ~~with~~on October 22, 2015. On December 7, 2015, Navitrucks filed its rebuttal to IIAA’s answer to counterclaims. The parties now expect the arbitral tribunal ~~on or before October 8, 2015.~~to set a hearing date. As of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the approximate amount of the IIAA claim against Navitrucks is R$73119 million (approximately US$2229 million as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015)~~2016), and the approximate amount of the Navitrucks claim against IIAA is R$~~195~~116 million (approximately US$5729 million as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015)~~2016). In addition, Navitrucks has acknowledged that IIAA is entitled to a credit against Navitrucks’ damages claim in the approximate amount of R$64 million (approximately US$16 million as of January 31, 2016).

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

In addition, two other truck dealers and a truck fleet owner in Brazil ~~have~~ initiated separate adversarial proceedings against IIAA that may have similar legal and factual issues as the Navitrucks claim. One truck dealer proceeding was resolved in favor of IIAA and the other two proceedings remain pending. These other claims are not material either individually or in the aggregate.

Other

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Inquiry

In June 2012, Navistar received an informal inquiry from the Chicago Office of the Enforcement Division of the SEC seeking a number of categories of documents for the periods dating back to November 1, 2010, relating to various accounting and disclosure issues. We received a formal order of private investigation in July 2012. We have received subsequent subpoenas from the staff of the SEC in connection with their inquiry. In December 2014, the SEC filed an application in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois seeking an order compelling the production of certain documents withheld by Navistar from its responses to the administrative subpoenas on the basis of attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. The discovery dispute involved a small number of documents in relation to the number of documents already produced by Navistar. On June 30, 2015, following an in camera review of some of the documents at issue, the Court entered an Order sustaining the privilege claims in part and overruling the claims in part. ~~Pursuant to that Order, and a~~The Court also entered related ~~order~~orders dated August 31, 2015 and October 21, 2015. Pursuant to those Orders, Navistar ~~is completing~~completed the production of those documents, or portions of documents, for which its privilege claims were denied, as well as other documents subject to the SEC’s December 2014 application that the Company determined were not privileged under the reasoning of the Court’s June 30, 2015 Order.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

On August 13 and 17, 2015, the SEC staff transmitted “Wells Notices” in connection with the formal order of investigation from July 2012 described above. The Notices state that the staff has made a preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC file an enforcement action against the Company and its former chief executive officer, Daniel Ustian, alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, certain related regulations, the Securities Act of 1933, and an August 5, 2010 Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings against the Company. We have been informed that the issues the staff may recommend the SEC pursue concern three applications in 2011 and 2012 by Navistar to the EPA for certification of heavy-duty diesel engines emitting 0.2g of NOx, as well as disclosures related to the circumstances of Mr. Ustian’s departure from the Company in August 2012. IfOn September 17, 2015, Navistar submitted to the SEC ~~were~~a response to ~~authorize an action against~~its Wells Notices addressing the Company, the remedies pursued might include an injunction, a cease-and-desist order, and/or civil money penalties. We understand that the staff’s investigation is ongoing, and we continue to cooperateaforementioned issues. On October 13, 2015, Navistar met with the SEC ~~in this matter. At this time, we are unable~~ to ~~predict~~further respond to the ~~outcome of~~Wells Notices and has had subsequent discussions with the SEC since that date. To resolve this matter, the Company has made an offer of settlement to the investigative staff of the SEC, and the investigative staff has decided to recommend that offer of settlement to the SEC. Under the proposed settlement, in which the Company would neither admit nor deny wrongdoing, the Company would consent to the entry of an administrative order with respect to negligence-based charges pertaining to periodic filing requirements and material misstatements or ~~provide meaningful quantification~~omissions related to the issues enumerated above. The Company would also agree to pay a civil penalty which was accrued for on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~how~~October 31, 2015. The proposed settlement is subject to final approval by the ~~final~~SEC. We cannot assure you the proposed settlement will be approved by the SEC and, in the event the proposed settlement is not approved, what the ultimate resolution of this ~~matter~~investigation will be or how it may impact our future consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

12. Segment Reporting

During November 2014, we announced changes in our leadership team and in our organizational and reporting structures. We believe this realignment will guide us into the future and enable us to accelerate our performance as we finish the turnaround. These changes impact how our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) assesses the performance of our operating segments and makes decisions about resource allocations. As a result, we identified the following changes within our reportable segments:

~~The export truck and parts operations, formerly in our~~ ~~Global Operations~~ ~~segment, are now included within the results of our~~ ~~Truck~~ ~~and~~ ~~Parts~~ ~~segments, respectively.~~

~~Parts required to support the military truck lines, formerly within our~~ ~~Parts~~ ~~segment, are now included within the results of our~~ ~~Truck~~ ~~segment.~~

All prior period segment information has been updated to conform to the 2015 presentation. Other than the changes noted above, there were no material changes to the reportable segments disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2014. The change in reportable segments had no effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows for the periods presented.

The following is a description of our four reporting segments:

Our Truck segment manufactures and distributes Class 4 through 8 trucks, buses, and military vehicles under the International and IC Bus ("IC") brands, ~~along with production of~~and produces engines under ~~the MaxxForce~~our proprietary brand name and parts required to support the military truck ~~lines,~~lines. This segment sells its products in ~~the~~ markets that include ~~sales in~~ the U.S., Canada, Mexico, and within our export truck business. In an effort to strengthen and maintain our dealer network, this segment occasionally acquires and operates dealer locations for the purpose of transitioning ownership.

Our Parts segment provides customers with proprietary products needed to support the International commercial truck, IC Bus, ~~MaxxForce~~proprietary engine lines, and export parts business, as well as our other product lines. Our Parts segment also provides a wide selection of other standard truck, trailer, and engine aftermarket parts. Also included in the Parts segment are the operating results of BDP, which manages the sourcing, merchandising, and distribution of certain service parts we sell to Ford in North America.

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Our Global Operations segment primarily consists of the IIAA (formerly MWM International Industria De Motores Da America Do Sul Ltda. ("MWM")) engine and truck operations in Brazil. The IIAA engine operations produce diesel engines, primarily under contract manufacturing arrangements, as well as under the MWM brand, for sale to OEMs in South America. In addition, our Global Operations segment includes the operating results of our joint venture in China with Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Co ("JAC").

Our Financial Services segment provides retail, wholesale, and lease financing of products sold by the Truck and Parts segments and their dealers within the U.S. and Mexico, as well as financing for wholesale accounts and selected retail accounts receivable.

Corporate contains those items that are not included in our four segments.

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Segment Profit (Loss)

We define segment profit (loss) as Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation excluding Income tax benefit (expense). Selected financial information is as follows:

(in millions) Truck Parts Global Operations
Financial
Services^(A)

Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Three Months Ended July 31, 2015
External sales and revenues, net $ 1,785
$ 614
$ 100
$ 37
$ 2
$ 2,538
Intersegment sales and revenues 49
11
9
26
(95 ) —
Total sales and revenues, net $ 1,834
$ 625
$ 109
$ 63
$ (93 ) $ 2,538
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax $ (36 ) $ 151
$ (26 ) $ 26
$ (145 ) $ (30 )
Income tax expense —
—
—
—
(12 ) (12 )
Segment profit (loss) $ (36 ) $ 151
$ (26 ) $ 26
$ (133 ) $ (18 )
Depreciation and amortization $ 40
$ 4
$ 6
$ 13
$ 5
$ 68
Interest expense —
—
—
19
56
75
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates 1
1
1
—
—
3
Capital expenditures^(B)
20
1
1
—
5
27


(in millions)	Truck			Parts		Global Operations			Financial Services^(A)		Corporate and Eliminations			Total			Truck			Parts		Global Operations			Financial Services^(A)		Corporate and Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
External sales and revenues, net	$	1,956		$	629	$	221		$	38	$	—		$	2,844		$	1,081		$	562	$	84		$	35	$	3		$	1,765
Intersegment sales and revenues	46			15		12			22		(95		)	—			51			8		8			24		(91		)	—
Total sales and revenues, net	$	2,002		$	644	$	233		$	60	$	(95	)	$	2,844		$	1,132		$	570	$	92		$	59	$	(88	)	$	1,765
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax	$	(3	)	$	137	$	(21	)	$	24	$	(140	)	$	(3	)	$	(51	)	$	150	$	(13	)	$	26	$	(145	)	$	(33	)
Income tax expense	—			—		—			—		(14		)	(14		)
Income tax benefit																	—			—		—			—		5			5
Segment profit (loss)	$	(3	)	$	137	$	(21	)	$	24	$	(126	)	$	11		$	(51	)	$	150	$	(13	)	$	26	$	(150	)	$	(38	)
Depreciation and amortization	$	42		$	4	$	7		$	12	$	6		$	71		$	34		$	3	$	5		$	12	$	4		$	58
Interest expense	—			—		—			18		60			78			—			—		—			19		62			81
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates	1			1		—			—		—			2
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates																	1			1		(3		)	—		—			(1		)
Capital expenditures^(B)	4			—		2			—		1			7			25			1		1			—		2			29



(in millions)	Truck			Parts		Global Operations			Financial Services^(A)		Corporate and Eliminations			Total
Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
External sales and revenues, net	$	1,631		$	614	$	138		$	36	$	2		$	2,421
Intersegment sales and revenues	74			12		14			24		(124		)	—
Total sales and revenues, net	$	1,705		$	626	$	152		$	60	$	(122	)	$	2,421
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax	$	(18	)	$	145	$	(15	)	$	24	$	(178	)	$	(42	)
Income tax expense	—			—		—			—		(7		)	(7		)
Segment profit (loss)	$	(18	)	$	145	$	(15	)	$	24	$	(171	)	$	(35	)
Depreciation and amortization	$	52		$	3	$	7		$	12	$	5		$	79
Interest expense	—			—		—			20		57			77
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates	2			1		(1		)	—		—			2
Capital expenditures^(B)	14			—		2			—		1			17

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

(in millions) Truck
Parts
Global Operations
Financial
Services^(A)

Corporate
and
Eliminations
Total
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015

External sales and revenues, net $ 5,349
$ 1,835
$ 353
$ 108
$ 7
$ 7,652
Intersegment sales and revenues 121
29
38
75
(263 ) —
Total sales and revenues, net $ 5,470
$ 1,864
$ 391
$ 183
$ (256 ) $ 7,652
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax $ (105 ) $ 429
$ (40 ) $ 72
$ (492 ) $ (136 )
Income tax expense —
—
—
—
(37 ) (37 )
Segment profit (loss) $ (105 ) $ 429
$ (40 ) $ 72
$ (455 ) $ (99 )
Depreciation and amortization $ 139
$ 11
$ 18
$ 37
$ 16
$ 221
Interest expense —
—
—
57
170
227
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates 4
3
(1 ) —
—
6
Capital expenditures^(B)
58
1
4
2
7
72

(in millions) Truck Parts Global Operations
Financial
Services^(A)
Corporate
and
Eliminations Total
Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
External sales and revenues, net $ 5,176
$ 1,817
$ 690
$ 115
$ —
$ 7,798
Intersegment sales and revenues 166
43
26
57
(292 ) —
Total sales and revenues, net $ 5,342
$ 1,860
$ 716
$ 172
$ (292 ) $ 7,798
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax $ (340 ) $ 378
$ (218 ) $ 71
$ (441 ) $ (550 )
Income tax expense —
—
—
—
(25 ) (25 )
Segment profit (loss) $ (340 ) $ 378
$ (218 ) $ 71
$ (416 ) $ (525 )
Depreciation and amortization $ 171
$ 12
$ 21
$ 33
$ 19
$ 256
Interest expense —
—
—
52
182
234
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates 3
3
(1 ) —
—
5
Capital expenditures^(B)
42
5
6
1
3
57


(in millions)	Truck		Parts		Global Operations		Financial Services		Corporate and Eliminations		Total		Truck		Parts		Global Operations		Financial Services		Corporate and Eliminations		Total
Segment assets, as of:
July 31, 2015	$	1,967	$	640	$	458	$	2,655	$	1,049	$	6,769
October 31, 2014^(C)	2,245		672		657		2,582		1,287		7,443
January 31, 2016													$	1,934	$	623	$	349	$	2,094	$	980	$	5,980
October 31, 2015													1,876		641		409		2,455		1,311		6,692

_________________________


(A)	Total sales and revenues in the Financial Services segment include interest revenues of ~~$46~~$42 million and ~~$135~~$45 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015, respectively~~2016 and ~~$44 million and $126 million for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014,~~2015, respectively.


(B)	Exclusive of purchases of equipment leased to others.

~~(C)~~

During the third quarter of 2015, it was determined that multiemployer plan accounting should have been applied in recording postretirement benefits related to our Financial Services segment, which provides that assets and liabilities of a plan are recorded only on the parent company and that periodic contributions to the plan made by the participating subsidiary are charged to expense for the purposes of the subsidiary's financial statements. As a result, we have reclassified $16 million of deferred tax assets between Financial Services and Corporate and Eliminations related to the postretirement benefits. This reclassification did not impact consolidated segment assets for the year-ended October 31, 2014.

3732

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

13. Stockholders' Deficit

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, included in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Deficit, consisted of the following:


(in millions)	Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Defined Benefit Plans			Total			Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Defined Benefit Plans			Total
Balance as of April 30, 2015	$	1	$	(213	)	$	(2,072	)	$	(2,284	)
Balance as of October 31, 2015												$	1	$	(287	)	$	(2,315	)	$	(2,601	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	—		(47		)	—			(47		)	—		(33		)	—			(33		)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss	—		—			33			33			—		—			33			33
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	—		(47		)	33			(14		)	—		(33		)	33			—
Balance as of July 31, 2015	$	1	$	(260	)	$	(2,039	)	$	(2,298	)
Balance as of January 31, 2016												$	1	$	(320	)	$	(2,282	)	$	(2,601	)

(in millions) Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Defined Benefit Plans Total
Balance as of October 31, 2014 $ 1
$ (127 ) $ (2,137 ) $ (2,263 )
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications —
(133 ) —
(133 )
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss —
—
98
98
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) —
(133 ) 98
(35 )
Balance as of July 31, 2015 $ 1
$ (260 ) $ (2,039 ) $ (2,298 )

(in millions) Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments Defined Benefit Plans Total
Balance as of April 30, 2014 $ (89 ) $ (1,699 ) $ (1,788 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (3 ) 7
4
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss —
26
26
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) (3 ) 33
30
Balance as of July 31, 2014 $ (92 ) $ (1,666 ) $ (1,758 )


(in millions)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Defined Benefit Plans			Total			Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities		Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments			Defined Benefit Plans			Total
Balance as of October 31, 2013	$	(75	)	$	(1,749	)	$	(1,824	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(17		)	5			(12		)
Balance as of October 31, 2014										$	1	$	(127	)	$	(2,137	)	$	(2,263	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications										—		(59		)	—			(59		)
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			78			78			—		—			32			32
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	(17		)	83			66			—		(59		)	32			(27		)
Balance as of July 31, 2014	$	(92	)	$	(1,666	)	$	(1,758	)
Balance as of January 31, 2015										$	1	$	(186	)	$	(2,105	)	$	(2,290	)

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following table displays the amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss and the affected line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

Location in Consolidated
Statements of Operations Three Months Ended July 31, 2015 Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015
Defined benefit plans
Amortization of prior service benefit Selling, general and administrative expenses $ (1 ) $ (3 )
Amortization of actuarial loss Selling, general and administrative expenses 34
102
Total before tax 33
99
Tax expense —
(1 )
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax $ 33
$ 98


										Three Months Ended January 31,
	Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations	Three Months Ended July 31, 2014			Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014				Location in Consolidated Statements of Operations	2016		2015
Defined benefit plans
Amortization of prior service benefit	Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(1	)	$	(3	)		Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	—	$	(1	)
Amortization of actuarial loss	Selling, general and administrative expenses	28			82				Selling, general and administrative expenses	33		33
	Total before tax	27			79
	Tax benefit	(1		)	(1		)
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax		$	26		$	78
Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax of $0 for both periods)								Total reclassifications for the period (net of tax of $0 for both periods)		$	33	$	32

3933

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

14. ~~Earnings (Loss)~~Loss Per Share Attributable to Navistar International Corporation

The following table presents the information used in the calculation of our basic and diluted ~~income (loss)~~loss per share for continuing operations, discontinued operations, and net loss, all attributable to Navistar International Corporation:

Three Months Ended July 31, Nine Months Ended July 31,
(in millions, except per share data) 2015 2014 2015 2014
Numerator:
Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation common stockholders:
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax $ (30 ) $ (3 ) $ (136 ) $ (550 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 2
1
2
3
Net loss $ (28 ) $ (2 ) $ (134 ) $ (547 )

Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic 81.6
81.4
81.5
81.3
Effect of dilutive securities —
—
—
—
Diluted 81.6
81.4
81.5
81.3

Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Navistar International Corporation:
Basic:
Continuing operations $ (0.37 ) $ (0.04 ) $ (1.67 ) $ (6.77 )
Discontinued operations 0.03
0.02
0.03
0.04
Net loss $ (0.34 ) $ (0.02 ) $ (1.64 ) $ (6.73 )
Diluted:
Continuing operations $ (0.37 ) $ (0.04 ) $ (1.67 ) $ (6.77 )
Discontinued operations 0.03
0.02
0.03
0.04
Net loss $ (0.34 ) $ (0.02 ) $ (1.64 ) $ (6.73 )

The conversion rate on our 2014 Convertible Notes was 19.891 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2014 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of $50.27 per share of common stock. In connection with the sale of the 2014 Convertible Notes, we sold warrants to various counterparties to purchase shares of our common stock from us at an exercise price of $60.14 per share. The 2014 Convertible Notes and warrants were anti-dilutive when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $50.27 and $60.14, respectively. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company unwound warrants representing 6.5 million shares associated with the repurchased 2014 Convertible Notes. On October 15, 2014, upon maturity the 2014 Convertible Notes were repaid in full. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company unwound warrants representing 1.9 million shares associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes, and the remaining 2.9 million warrants expired worthless on April 10, 2015.



	Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except per share data)	2016			2015
Numerator:
Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation common stockholders:
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(33	)	$	(42	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	—			—
Net loss	$	(33	)	$	(42	)

Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	81.7			81.5
Effect of dilutive securities	—			—
Diluted	81.7			81.5

Loss per share attributable to Navistar International Corporation:
Basic:
Continuing operations	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)
Discontinued operations	—			—
Net loss	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)
Diluted:
Continuing operations	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)
Discontinued operations	—			—
Net loss	$	(0.40	)	$	(0.52	)

The conversion rate on our 4.50% ~~Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes~~senior subordinated convertible notes due 2018 ("~~the~~ 2018 Convertible Notes") is 17.1233 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2018 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $58.40 per share of common stock. The 2018 Convertible Notes ~~are~~have an anti-dilutive effect when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $58.40.

The conversion rate on our 4.75% senior subordinated convertible notes due April 2019 ("2019 Convertible ~~Notes~~Notes") is 18.4946 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $54.07 per share of common stock. The 2019 Convertible Notes ~~are~~have an anti-dilutive effect when calculating diluted earnings per share when our average stock price is less than $54.07.

The computation of diluted earnings per share also excludes outstanding options and other common stock equivalents in periods where inclusion of such potential common stock instruments would be anti-dilutive.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, no dilutive securities were included in the computation of diluted loss per share ~~since they~~as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss attributable to Navistar International Corporation. Additionally, certain securities have been excluded from the computation of earnings per share, as our average stock price was less than ~~their~~the respective exercise prices. For ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, the aggregate shares not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share were ~~15.0~~15 million and ~~16.0~~17 million, respectively. ~~For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, the aggregate shares not included were 23.8 million and 26.2 million, respectively.~~

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~For~~In both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 3.4 million shares related to the 2018 Convertible Notes and 7.6 million shares related to the 2019 Convertible Notes.

~~For the three months ended July 31, 2014, the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 4.8 million shares related~~

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to the warrants associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes, 3.3 million shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes, 3.4 million shares related to the 2018 Convertible Notes, and 7.6 million shares related to the 2019 Convertible Notes.Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

For the nine months ended July 31, 2014, the aggregate shares not included in the computation of earnings per share were primarily comprised of 7.0 million shares related to the warrants associated with the 2014 Convertible Notes, 6.0 million shares related to the 2014 Convertible Notes, 3.4 million shares related to the 2018 Convertible Notes, and 5.1 million shares related to the 2019 Convertible Notes.(Unaudited)

15. Condensed Consolidating Guarantor and Non-guarantor Financial Information

The following tables set forth condensed consolidating balance sheets as of ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and condensed consolidating statements of operations and ~~condensed consolidating statements of~~ comprehensive income (loss) for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, and condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014.~~2015.

The information is presented as a result of Navistar, Inc.’s guarantee, exclusive of its subsidiaries, of NIC’s indebtedness under our 8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, and obligations under our Loan Agreement related to the 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040. Navistar, Inc. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of NIC. None of NIC’s other subsidiaries guarantee any of these notes or bonds. The guarantees are "full and unconditional", as those terms are used in Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, except that the guarantees will be automatically released in certain customary circumstances, such as when the subsidiary is sold or all of the assets of the subsidiary are sold, the capital stock is sold, when the subsidiary is designated as an "unrestricted subsidiary" for purposes of the respective ~~indenture~~indentures for each of the 8.25% Senior Notes, due 2021, and the 6.5% Tax Exempt Bonds, due 2040, upon liquidation or dissolution of the subsidiary or upon legal or covenant defeasance, or satisfaction and discharge of the notes or bonds. Separate financial statements and other disclosures concerning Navistar, Inc. have not been presented because management believes that such information is not material to investors. Within this disclosure only, "NIC" includes the financial results of the parent company only, with all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method. Likewise, "Navistar, Inc.," for purposes of this disclosure only, includes the consolidated financial results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries accounted for under the equity method and its operating units accounted for on a consolidated basis. "Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries" includes the combined financial results of all other non-guarantor subsidiaries. "Eliminations and Other" includes all eliminations and reclassifications to reconcile to the consolidated financial statements. NIC files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return that includes Navistar, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries. Navistar, Inc. has a tax allocation agreement ("Tax Agreement") with NIC which requires Navistar, Inc. to compute its separate federal income tax liability and remit any resulting tax liability to NIC. Tax benefits that may arise from net operating losses of Navistar, Inc. are not refunded to Navistar, Inc. but may be used to offset future required tax payments under the Tax Agreement. The effect of the Tax Agreement is to allow NIC, the parent company, rather than Navistar, Inc., to utilize current U.S. taxable losses of Navistar, Inc. and all other direct or indirect subsidiaries of NIC.



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net	$	—		$	1,342		$	1,200		$	(777	)	$	1,765
Costs of products sold	—			1,204			1,023			(761		)	1,466
Restructuring charges	—			1			2			—			3
Asset impairment charges	—			—			2			—			2
All other operating expenses (income)	19			213			108			(18		)	322
Total costs and expenses	19			1,418			1,135			(779		)	1,793
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates	(14		)	(13		)	(1		)	27			(1		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(33		)	(89		)	64			29			(29		)
Income tax benefit (expense)	—			13			(8		)	—			5
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	(33		)	(76		)	56			29			(24		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	—			—			—			—			—
Net income (loss)	(33		)	(76		)	56			29			(24		)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			—			9			—			9
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(33	)	$	(76	)	$	47		$	29		$	(33	)

4135

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net $ —
$ 1,892
$ 1,875
$ (1,229 ) $ 2,538
Costs of products sold —
1,752
1,627
(1,207 ) 2,172
Restructuring charges —
5
8
—
13
Asset impairment charges —
—
7
—
7
All other operating expenses (income) 12
262
102
(16 ) 360
Total costs and expenses 12
2,019
1,744
(1,223 ) 2,552
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (16 ) 76
2
(59 ) 3
Income (loss) before income taxes (28 ) (51 ) 133
(65 ) (11 )
Income tax expense —
(1 ) (11 ) —
(12 )
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (28 ) (52 ) 122
(65 ) (23 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax —
—
2
—
2
Net income (loss) (28 ) (52 ) 124
(65 ) (21 )
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests —
—
7
—
7
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (28 ) $ (52 ) $ 117
$ (65 ) $ (28 )

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC
Navistar,
Inc.
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
and Other
Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (28 )
$ (52 )
$ 117

$ (65 )
$ (28 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustment (47 )
—

(47 )
47

(47 )
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $0, for all entities) 33

8

25

(33 )
33
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (14 )
8

(22 )
14

(14 )
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (42 )
$ (44 )
$ 95

$ (51 )
$ (42 )

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net $ —
$ 5,511
$ 5,586
$ (3,445 ) $ 7,652
Costs of products sold —
5,025
4,932
(3,380 ) 6,577
Restructuring charges —
8
14
—
22
Asset impairment charges —
8
7
—
15
All other operating expenses (income) 62
808
306
(56 ) 1,120
Total costs and expenses 62
5,849
5,259
(3,436 ) 7,734
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (72 ) 155
3
(80 ) 6
Income (loss) before income taxes (134 ) (183 ) 330
(89 ) (76 )
Income tax expense —
(3 ) (34 ) —
(37 )
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (134 ) (186 ) 296
(89 ) (113 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax —
—
2
—
2
Net income (loss) (134 ) (186 ) 298
(89 ) (111 )
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests —
—
23
—
23
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (134 ) $ (186 ) $ 275
$ (89 ) $ (134 )

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (134 ) $ (186 ) $ 275
$ (89 ) $ (134 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment (133 ) —
(133 ) 133
(133 )
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(1), $14, $(15), $1, and $(1), respectively) 98
70
28
(98 ) 98
Total other comprehensive income (loss) (35 ) 70
(105 ) 35
(35 )
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (169 ) $ (116 ) $ 170
$ (54 ) $ (169 )

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 226
$ 44
$ 277
$ —
$ 547
Marketable securities 149
—
144
—
293
Restricted cash 17
3
337
—
357
Finance and other receivables, net 3
142
2,271
(22 ) 2,394
Inventories —
731
481
(13 ) 1,199
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates (7,352 ) 6,570
67
786
71
Property and equipment, net —
751
633
(9 ) 1,375
Goodwill —
—
38
—
38
Deferred taxes, net ^(A)
5
9
149
—
163
Other 35
133
166
(2 ) 332
Total assets $ (6,917 ) $ 8,383
$ 4,563
$ 740
$ 6,769
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt $ 1,968
$ 872
$ 2,449
$ (3 ) $ 5,286
Postretirement benefits liabilities ^(A)
—
2,651
189
—
2,840
Amounts due to (from) affiliates (7,669 ) 12,082
(4,590 ) 177
—
Other liabilities 3,600
202
(275 ) (75 ) 3,452
Total liabilities (2,101 ) 15,807
(2,227 ) 99
11,578
Redeemable equity securities 1
—
—
—
1
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest —
—
7
—
7
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation ^(A)
(4,817 ) (7,424 ) 6,783
641
(4,817 )
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ (6,917 ) $ 8,383
$ 4,563
$ 740
$ 6,769

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations $ (106 ) $ 282
$ 62
$ (252 ) $ (14 )
Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents 1
1
(194 ) —
(192 )
Net sales of marketable securities 230
—
82
—
312
Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others ��
(52 ) (78 ) —
(130 )
Other investing activities —
3
12
—
15
Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities 231
(48 ) (178 ) —
5
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt —
(189 ) 176
126
113
Other financing activities —
(54 ) (99 ) 126
(27 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities —
(243 ) 77
252
86
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents —
—
(27 ) —
(27 )
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 125
(9 ) (66 ) —
50
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 101
53
343
—
497
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $ 226
$ 44
$ 277
$ —
$ 547

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions) NIC
Navistar, Inc.
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Eliminations and Other
Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net $ —

$ 1,962

$ 2,181

$ (1,299 )
$ 2,844
Costs of products sold —

1,761

1,938

(1,282 )
2,417
Restructuring charges —

(1 )
17

—

16
Asset impairment charges —

13

(11 )
2

4
All other operating expenses (income) 17

246

141

(16 )
388
Total costs and expenses 17

2,019

2,085

(1,296 )
2,825
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates 15

17

1

(31 )
2
Income (loss) before income taxes (2 )
(40 )
97

(34 )
21
Income tax expense —

(2 )
(12 )
—

(14 )
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (2 )
(42 )
85

(34 )
7
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax —

—

1

—

1
Net income (loss) (2 )
(42 )
86

(34 )
8
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests —

—

10

—

10
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (2 )
$ (42 )
$ 76

$ (34 )
$ (2 )

~~Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2014
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2016																Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated			NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(2	)	$	(42	)	$	76		$	(34	)	$	(2	)
Net income (loss)																$	(33	)	$	(76	)	$	56		$	29		$	(24	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(3		)	—			(3		)	3			(3		)	(33		)	—			(33		)	33			(33		)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(3), $0, $(3), $3, and $(3), respectively)	33			23			10			(33		)	33
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $0 for all entities)																33			32			1			(33		)	33
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	30			23			7			(30		)	30			—			32			(32		)	—			—
Comprehensive income (loss)																(33		)	(44		)	24			29			(24		)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests																—			—			9			—			9
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	28		$	(19	)	$	83		$	(64	)	$	28		$	(33	)	$	(44	)	$	15		$	29		$	(33	)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions) NIC Navistar, Inc. Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations and Other Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net $ —
$ 5,279
$ 5,971
$ (3,452 ) $ 7,798
Costs of products sold —
4,983
5,331
(3,415 ) 6,899
Restructuring charges —
9
18
—
27
Asset impairment charges —
13
160
—
173
All other operating expenses (income) 94
760
389
(44 ) 1,199
Total costs and expenses 94
5,765
5,898
(3,459 ) 8,298
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates (466 ) (135 ) 2
604
5
Income (loss) before income taxes (560 ) (621 ) 75
611
(495 )
Income tax benefit (expense) 13
(3 ) (35 ) —
(25 )
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations (547 ) (624 ) 40
611
(520 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax —
—
3
—
3
Net income (loss) (547 ) (624 ) 43
611
(517 )
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests —
—
30
—
30
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (547 ) $ (624 ) $ 13
$ 611
$ (547 )

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions) NIC Navistar, Inc. Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries Eliminations and Other Consolidated
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (547 ) $ (624 ) $ 13
$ 611
$ (547 )
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustment (17 ) —
(17 ) 17
(17 )
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(4) $0, $(4), $4, and $(4), respectively) 83
73
10
(83 ) 83
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 66
73
(7 ) (66 ) 66
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation $ (481 ) $ (551 ) $ 6
$ 545
$ (481 )



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of January 31, 2016
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	257		$	32		$	290		$	—		$	579
Marketable securities	2			—			150			—			152
Restricted cash	16			6			96			—			118
Finance and other receivables, net	5			89			1,990			(103		)	1,981
Inventories	—			896			386			(13		)	1,269
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates	(7,692		)	6,148			62			1,546			64
Property and equipment, net	—			713			599			(8		)	1,304
Goodwill	—			—			38			—			38
Deferred taxes, net	—			16			141			—			157
Other	31			135			154			(2		)	318
Total assets	$	(7,381	)	$	8,035		$	3,906		$	1,420		$	5,980
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt	$	1,975		$	1,160		$	1,969		$	(5	)	$	5,099
Postretirement benefits liabilities	—			2,880			179			—			3,059
Amounts due to (from) affiliates	(7,856		)	10,544			(2,862		)	174			—
Other liabilities	3,697			71			(687		)	(69		)	3,012
Total liabilities	(2,184		)	14,655			(1,401		)	100			11,170
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest	—			—			7			—			7
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	(5,197		)	(6,620		)	5,300			1,320			(5,197		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	(7,381	)	$	8,035		$	3,906		$	1,420		$	5,980

4536

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2014
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 101
$ 53
$ 343
$ —
$ 497
Marketable securities 379
—
226
—
605
Restricted cash 19
4
148
—
171
Finance and other receivables, net —
124
2,504
(12 ) 2,616
Inventories —
792
539
(12 ) 1,319
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates (7,245 ) 6,410
71
837
73
Property and equipment, net —
827
740
(5 ) 1,562
Goodwill —
—
38
—
38
Deferred taxes, net ^(A)
5
25
169
1
200
Other 34
137
194
(3 ) 362
Total assets $ (6,707 ) $ 8,372
$ 4,972
$ 806
$ 7,443
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt $ 1,958
$ 937
$ 2,336
$ (7 ) $ 5,224
Postretirement benefits liabilities ^(A)
—
2,752
203
—
2,955
Amounts due to (from) affiliates (7,618 ) 11,739
(4,267 ) 146
—
Other liabilities 3,605
370
(22 ) (71 ) 3,882
Total liabilities (2,055 ) 15,798
(1,750 ) 68
12,061
Redeemable equity securities 2
—
—
—
2
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest —
—
34
—
34
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation ^(A)
(4,654 ) (7,426 ) 6,688
738
(4,654 )
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $ (6,707 ) $ 8,372
$ 4,972
$ 806
$ 7,443



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations	$	(309	)	$	(332	)	$	226		$	313		$	(102	)
Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents	—			1			(2		)	—			(1		)
Net sales of marketable securities	110			—			(103		)	—			7
Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others	—			(17		)	(61		)	—			(78		)
Other investing activities	—			—			13			—			13
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	110			(16		)	(153		)	—			(59		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt	—			292			(152		)	(313		)	(173		)
Other financing activities	—			7			(9		)	—			(2		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	—			299			(161		)	(313		)	(175		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	—			—			3			—			3
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(199		)	(49		)	(85		)	—			(333		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	456			81			375			—			912
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	257		$	32		$	290		$	—		$	579

~~_________________________~~

~~(A)~~

During the third quarter of 2015, it was determined that multiemployer plan accounting should have been applied in recording postretirement benefits related to our Financial Services segment, which provides that assets and liabilities of a plan are recorded only on the parent company and that periodic contributions to the plan made by the participating subsidiary are charged to expense for the purposes of the subsidiary's financial statements. As a result, we have reclassified $40 million of postretirement benefits, and related deferred taxes and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income impact, between NIC and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. This reclassification did not impact the consolidated financial position for the year-ended October 31, 2014.



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Sales and revenues, net	$	—		$	1,610		$	1,768		$	(957	)	$	2,421
Costs of products sold	—			1,409			1,570			(934		)	2,045
Restructuring charges	—			3			—			—			3
Asset impairment charges	—			7			—			—			7
All other operating expenses (income)	23			264			125			(18		)	394
Total costs and expenses	23			1,683			1,695			(952		)	2,449
Equity in income (loss) of affiliates	(19		)	15			1			5			2
Income (loss) before income taxes	(42		)	(58		)	74			—			(26		)
Income tax expense	—			(1		)	(6		)	—			(7		)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations	(42		)	(59		)	68			—			(33		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	—			—			—			—			—
Net income (loss)	(42		)	(59		)	68			—			(33		)
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			—			9			—			9
Net income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(42	)	$	(59	)	$	59		$	—		$	(42	)

4637

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014
(in millions) NIC Navistar,
Inc. Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries Eliminations
and Other Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations $ (528 ) $ (1,078 ) $ 156
$ 1,106
$ (344 )
Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents 6
—
(36 ) —
(30 )
Net sales of marketable securities 315
—
(103 ) —
212
Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others —
(89 ) (125 ) —
(214 )
Other investing activities —
22
24
—
46
Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities 321
(67 ) (240 ) —
14
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt (11 ) 1,067
192
(1,136 ) 112
Other financing activities 18
44
(70 ) 30
22
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 7
1,111
122
(1,106 ) 134
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents —
—
(12 ) —
(12 )
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (200 ) (34 ) 26
—
(208 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 336
72
347
—
755
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $ 136
$ 38
$ 373
$ —
$ 547



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Net income (loss)	$	(42	)	$	(59	)	$	68	$	—		$	(33	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(59		)	—			59		(59		)	(59		)
Defined benefit plans (net of tax of $(1), $0, $(1), $1, and $(1), respectively)	32			31			1		(32		)	32
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	(27		)	31			60		(91		)	(27		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	(69		)	(28		)	128		(91		)	(60		)
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests	—			—			9		—			9
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	$	(69	)	$	(28	)	$	119	$	(91	)	$	(69	)



Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of October 31, 2015
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	456		$	81		$	375		$	—		$	912
Marketable securities	112			—			47			—			159
Restricted cash	16			7			98			—			121
Finance and other receivables, net	1			99			2,440			(103		)	2,437
Inventories	—			809			342			(16		)	1,135
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates	(7,679		)	6,204			64			1,477			66
Property and equipment, net	—			737			616			(8		)	1,345
Goodwill	—			—			38			—			38
Deferred taxes, net	7			20			137			—			164
Other	33			128			155			(1		)	315
Total assets	$	(7,054	)	$	8,085		$	4,312		$	1,349		$	6,692
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Debt	$	1,971		$	1,180		$	2,151		$	(4	)	$	5,298
Postretirement benefits liabilities	—			2,909			179			—			3,088
Amounts due to (from) affiliates	(7,574		)	10,280			(2,879		)	173			—
Other liabilities	3,716			207			(388		)	(69		)	3,466
Total liabilities	(1,887		)	14,576			(937		)	100			11,852
Stockholders’ equity attributable to non-controlling interest	—			—			7			—			7
Stockholders’ equity (deficit) attributable to Navistar International Corporation	(5,167		)	(6,491		)	5,242			1,249			(5,167		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	(7,054	)	$	8,085		$	4,312		$	1,349		$	6,692

Navistar International Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

(Unaudited)



Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
(in millions)	NIC			Navistar, Inc.			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations and Other			Consolidated
Net cash provided by (used in) operations	$	(194	)	$	(46	)	$	(112	)	$	141		$	(211	)
Cash flows from investment activities
Net change in restricted cash and cash equivalents	—			(3		)	56			—			53
Net sales of marketable securities	278			—			152			—			430
Capital expenditures and purchase of equipment leased to others	—			(8		)	(19		)	—			(27		)
Other investing activities	—			—			1			—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	278			(11		)	190			—			457
Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (repayments) of debt	—			34			(80		)	(61		)	(107		)
Other financing activities	—			10			68			(80		)	(2		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	—			44			(12		)	(141		)	(109		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	—			—			(14		)	—			(14		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	84			(13		)	52			—			123
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	101			53			343			—			497
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	185		$	40		$	395		$	—		$	620


Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of ~~Operation~~Operations ("MD&A") is designed to provide information that is supplemental to, and should be read together with, our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014.~~2015. Information in MD&A is intended to assist the reader in obtaining an understanding of (i) our consolidated financial statements, (ii) the changes in certain key items within those financial statements from year-to-year, (iii) the primary factors that contributed to those changes, (iv) any changes in known trends or uncertainties from items disclosed within the MD&A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014~~2015 that we are aware of and that may have a material effect on our future performance, and (v) how certain accounting principles affect our consolidated financial statements. In addition, MD&A provides information about our business segments and how the results of those segments impact our results of operations and financial condition as a whole. Operating results for interim reporting periods are not necessarily indicative of annual operating results.

Executive Overview

Navistar is an international manufacturer of International^® brand commercial and military trucks, ~~MaxxForce~~^®proprietary brand diesel engines, and IC Bus™ ("IC") brand school and commercial buses, as well as a provider of service parts for trucks and diesel engines. Our core business is conducted in the North American truck and parts markets, where we principally participate in the U.S. and Canada ~~School~~school bus and Class 6 through 8 medium and heavy ~~trucks~~truck markets (our "Core" markets). We also provide retail, wholesale, and lease financing services for our trucks and parts.

~~Third~~First Quarter Summary

During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, we continued to ~~make strides with~~focus on our strategy which ~~centers around three key components: finishing the "Drive-to-Deliver" turnaround, establishing a leading position in the~~includes: implementing our customer centric strategy, completing new product launches, improving financial performance and increasing profitable market ~~based on an uptime advantage, and developing effective leaders at every level.~~share. We believe our strategy will enable us to ~~continue to~~ improve our sales ~~and~~as well as market share ~~reduce costs,~~ and add value to our customers.

We continue to focus on our Core markets. On February 1, 2016 we launched the International® HX™ Series, the first in a series of new product launches. The HX™ is a Class 8 premium vocational truck designed to deliver the strength and durability required for ~~our customers, including providing a lower cost of ownership and improved fuel economy.~~the severe service business.

We also continue to evaluate our portfolio of assets, with the purpose of closing or divesting non-core/non-strategic businesses, and identifying opportunities to restructure our business and rationalize our Manufacturing operations in an effort to optimize our cost structure. ~~We believe the strategy, coupled with our continued focus~~In February 2016, we sold Pure Power Technologies (“PPT”), a components business focused on ~~optimizing our cost structure, will enable us to build on our progress to-date, improve our financial performance,~~air and ~~achieve our long-term financial goals.~~

We continue to focus on our Core markets. In the third quarter of 2015, the truck industry retail deliveries for our Core markets were up 19% compared to the third quarter of 2014. Our chargeouts of trucks in our Core markets were up 5%, reflecting a 22% increase in Class 8 severe service trucks, a 13% increase in school buses and a 6% increase in Class 6 and 7 medium trucks, partially offset by a 4% decrease of Class 8 heavy trucks compared to the third quarter of 2014.fuel systems.

Financial Summary

Continuing Operations Results—In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, our consolidated net sales and revenues were ~~$2.5~~$1.8 billion, down ~~11%~~27% compared to the prior year quarter. Chargeouts from our Core markets were up 5% compared to the third quarter of 2014; however, this improvement was more than offset by declines in BDT and export sales in our Truck segment, and declines in our Global Operations and Parts segments. In the first nine months of 2015, our consolidated net sales and revenues were $7.7 billion, down 2% compared to the first nine months of 2014. The 2%27% decrease reflects lower sales from our Global Operations, Parts, and Truck segments.

The Truck segment ~~partially offset by higher~~net sales decreased due to lower Core truck volumes, lower Ford sales in our Blue Diamond Truck ~~segment.~~

~~The decrease in the Truck segment during the third quarter of 2015 reflects lower Ford sales through our BDT~~("BDT") joint venture, and ~~lower sales~~a decline in our export truck ~~operations, partially offset by improved Core truck volumes and increased military sales.~~operations. The ~~increase~~decrease in ~~the Truck segment during the first nine months of 2015 reflects improved Core truck volumes and increased military~~net sales ~~partially offset by lower BDT sales and lower export truck operations and used truck sales. The decrease~~ in the Global Operations segment ~~in the third quarter and first nine months of 2015~~ is due to lower volumes and unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates in our South American engine ~~and Brazil truck~~ operations. The decrease in ~~Parts segment~~net sales in the ~~third quarter of 2015~~Parts segment is primarily due to ~~a decline in BDP and export parts sales, partially offset by improvements~~lower volumes in our North America ~~markets.~~markets and lower sales through our BDP joint venture.

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, we incurred a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of ~~$11~~$29 million compared to ~~income~~a loss from continuing operations of ~~$21~~$26 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~decline in our comparative results in the third quarter of 2015~~higher loss was primarily driven by ~~a $29 million benefit for~~higher adjustments to pre-existing warranties ~~in the third quarter in 2014~~ and an increase in our used truck reserves, partially offset by favorable product mix within our Core markets and reduced structural costs of $30 million. During the first nine months of 2015, we incurred a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $76 million compared to a loss from continuing operations of $495 million in the first nine months of 2014. The improvement in our comparative results in the first nine months of 2015 was primarily driven by lower asset impairment charges, lower adjustments to pre-existing warranties, favorable product mix within our Core markets, and lower structural costs of ~~$40~~$57 million, ~~partially offset by an increase in our used truck reserves. During the second quarter~~improved Other income of ~~2014, we concluded certain assets were impaired and recognized a non-cash charge of $149~~$19 million primarily ~~related~~due to ~~goodwill,~~a one-time fee received from a third party, improved product margin, and ~~established a valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets related to our Brazilian operations, which impacted income tax expense by $29 million. In addition, our~~lower asset impairment charges. Our gross used truck inventory increased to approximately ~~$350~~$440 million at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 from ~~$320~~$390 million at October 31, ~~2014~~2015 (offset by reserves of ~~$95~~$145 million and ~~$40~~$110 million, respectively, and including approximately $5 million and $3 million in our Financial Services segment, at the respective dates) due, in part, to an increase in used truck receipts coupled with a decrease in used truck sales. ~~Throughout 2015, we continued~~We continue to seek alternative channels to sell our used trucks, including certain export markets which ~~result~~have resulted in a lower price point as compared to our domestic channels. ~~As a result, during the third quarter of 2015, we recorded a $15 million charge to our inventory reserve.~~

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, consolidated net income ~~(loss)~~ from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation, before manufacturing interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses (“EBITDA”) was ~~$106~~$82 million, compared to EBITDA of ~~$142~~$101 million for the comparable period in ~~2014. Included~~2015. Excluding adjustments of a $5 million and $47 million net benefit in ~~our~~the three months ended January 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, adjusted EBITDA ~~for the third quarter of 2015 are net charges of $23 million, compared to net benefits of $9~~was $77 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014. Excluding these items, adjusted EBITDA was $129 million in the third quarter of 2015~~2016 compared to adjusted EBITDA of ~~$133~~$54 million in ~~the third quarter of 2014. In the first nine months of 2015, EBITDA was $292 million, compared to an EBITDA loss of $87 million for~~ the comparable period in 2014. Included in our EBITDA for the first nine months of 2015 are net benefits of $7 million compared to net charges of $265 million in the first nine months of 2014. Excluding these items, adjusted EBITDA was $285 million in the first nine months of 2015 compared to adjusted EBITDA of $178 million in 2014.2015. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not determined in accordance with ~~or an alternative for, US. GAAP. They exclude certain identified items.~~U.S. GAAP, nor are they presented as alternatives to U.S. GAAP measures. For more information regarding this non-GAAP financial information, see Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015,~~2016, we recognized income tax ~~expense~~benefit from continuing operations of ~~$12~~$5 million, ~~and $37 million, respectively,~~ compared to income tax expense of ~~$14 million and $25~~$7 million in the ~~respective~~ prior ~~periods.~~year. The difference in the income tax benefit in 2016 and the income tax expense in 2015 was primarily due to ~~geographical mix and certain discrete items. The first nine months of 2014 included a net~~the $13 million income tax ~~expense of $14 million related to our Brazilian operations, offset by a tax~~ benefit ~~of $13 million resulting~~ from the ~~application~~2016 release of the ~~intraperiod tax allocation rules due to the issuance and repurchase of our convertible notes and a tax benefit of $8 million due to a decrease in uncertain tax positions.~~valuation allowance on U.S. AMT credits.

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015,~~2016, after income taxes, the loss from continuing operations attributable to Navistar International Corporation was ~~$30 million and $136~~$33 million, or ~~$0.37 and $1.67~~$0.40 per diluted share, compared to a loss of ~~$3 million and $550~~$42 million, or ~~$0.04 and $6.77~~$0.52 per diluted share, in the ~~respective prior year periods.~~first quarter of 2015.

We ended the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 with ~~$840~~$731 million of consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, compared to $1.1 billion as of October 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The decrease in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was primarily attributable to an increase in inventories and other noncurrent assets as well as decreases in accounts payable and other current and noncurrent liabilities, repayment of short-term and long-term debt, and payments for capital expenditures, partially offset by ~~a decrease in inventory.~~collections of accounts and finance receivables, and proceeds received for the sale of property and equipment.

4941

Results of Continuing Operations

The following information summarizes our Consolidated Statements of Operations and illustrates the key financial indicators used to assess our consolidated financial results.

Results of Operations for the ~~three and nine months~~quarter ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 as compared to the ~~three and nine months~~quarter ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2014~~2015


	Three Months Ended July 31,									% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except per share data and % change)	2015			2014			Change					2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change				% Change
Sales and revenues, net	$	2,538		$	2,844		$	(306	)	% Change	(11	)%		$	7,652			$	7,798			$	(146	)	% Change			(2	)%	$	1,765			$	2,421			$	(656	)	(27	)%
Costs of products sold	2,172			2,417			(245		)	(10	)%		6,577				6,899				(322		)		(5	)%	1,466				2,045				(579		)		(28	)%
Restructuring charges	13			16			(3		)	(19	)%		22				27				(5		)		(19	)%	3				3				—				—	%
Asset impairment charges	7			4			3			75	%		15				173				(158		)		(91	)%	2				7				(5		)		(71	)%
Selling, general and administrative expenses	220			241			(21		)	(9	)%		704				717				(13		)		(2	)%	205				241				(36		)		(15	)%
Engineering and product development costs	71			80			(9		)	(11	)%		226				253				(27		)		(11	)%	58				79				(21		)		(27	)%
Interest expense	75			78			(3		)	(4	)%		227				234				(7		)		(3	)%	81				77				4				5	%
Other income, net	(6		)	(11		)	5			(45	)%		(37		)		(5		)		(32		)		N.M.		(22		)		(3		)		(19		)		N.M.
Total costs and expenses	2,552			2,825			(273		)	(10	)%		7,734				8,298				(564		)		(7	)%	1,793				2,449				(656		)		(27	)%
Equity in income of non-consolidated affiliates	3			2			1			50	%		6				5				1				20	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	(11		)	21			(32		)	N.M.			(76		)		(495		)		419				(85	)%
Income tax expense	(12		)	(14		)	2			(14	)%		(37		)		(25		)		(12		)		48	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations	(23		)	7			(30		)	N.M.			(113		)		(520		)		407				(78	)%
Equity in income (loss) of non-consolidated affiliates																											(1		)		2				(3		)		N.M.
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes																											(29		)		(26		)		(3		)		12	%
Income tax benefit (expense)																											5				(7		)		12				N.M.
Loss from continuing operations																											(24		)		(33		)		9				(27	)%
Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	7			10			(3		)	(30	)%		23				30				(7		)		(23	)%	9				9				—				—	%
Loss from continuing operations^(A)	(30		)	(3		)	(27		)	N.M.			(136		)		(550		)		414				(75	)%	(33		)		(42		)		9				(21	)%
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	2			1			1			100	%		2				3				(1		)		(33	)%
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax																											—				—				—				—	%
Net loss^(A)	$	(28	)	$	(2	)	$	(26	)	N.M.			$	(134	)		$	(547	)		$	413			(76	)%	$	(33	)		$	(42	)		$	9			(21	)%

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:^(A)
Diluted loss per share:^(A)
Continuing operations	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.33	)	N.M.			$	(1.67	)		$	(6.77	)		$	5.10			(75	)%	$	(0.40	)		$	(0.52	)		$	0.12			(23	)%
Discontinued operations	0.03			0.02			0.01			50	%		0.03				0.04				(0.01		)		(25	)%	—				—				—				—	%
	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.32	)	N.M.			$	(1.64	)		$	(6.73	)		$	5.09			(76	)%	$	(0.40	)		$	(0.52	)		$	0.12			(23	)%
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	81.6			81.4			0.2			—	%		81.5				81.3				0.2				—	%	81.7				81.5				0.2				—	%

_________________________


N.M.	Not meaningful.


(A)	Amounts attributable to Navistar International Corporation.

Sales and revenues, net

Our sales and revenues, net, are principally generated via sales of products and services. Sales and revenues, net, by reporting segment were as follows:


	Three Months Ended July 31,									% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except % change)	2015			2014			Change					2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change				% Change
Truck	$	1,834		$	2,002		(168		)	% Change	(8	)%		$	5,470			$	5,342			$	128		% Change			2	%	$	1,132			$	1,705			$	(573	)	(34	)%
Parts	625			644			(19		)	(3	)%		1,864				1,860				4				—	%	570				626				(56		)		(9	)%
Global Operations	109			233			(124		)	(53	)%		391				716				(325		)		(45	)%	92				152				(60		)		(39	)%
Financial Services	63			60			3			5	%		183				172				11				6	%	59				60				(1		)		(2	)%
Corporate and Eliminations	(93		)	(95		)	2			(2	)%		(256		)		(292		)		36				(12	)%	(88		)		(122		)		34				(28	)%
Total	$	2,538		$	2,844		$	(306	)	(11	)%		$	7,652			$	7,798			$	(146	)		(2	)%	$	1,765			$	2,421			$	(656	)		(27	)%

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, the Truck segment net sales ~~decrease of $168~~decreased $573 million, or 8%34%, ~~was~~ primarily due to lower Core truck volumes, a ~~decrease~~decline in ~~Ford~~BDT sales, ~~through our BDT joint venture~~ and a decline in our export truck operations, particularly in Colombia and Venezuela, partially offset by improved Core truck volumes and increased military sales. Chargeouts from our Core market were up 5%, reflecting improvements in our Class 8 severe service trucks, school buses and our Class 6 and 7 medium trucks, partially offset by a decrease in our Class 8 heavy trucks. In the first nine months of 2015, the Truck segment net sales increase of $128 million, or 2%, was primarily due to improved Core truck volumes and increased military sales, partially offset by a decline in in our export truck and used truck operations and a decline in BDT sales.operations. Chargeouts from our Core markets were ~~up 10%, reflecting improvements in all truck classes, primarily Class 6 and 7 medium trucks.~~down 19%.

In ~~the third quarter of 2015, the~~2016, Parts segment net sales ~~decrease of $19~~decreased $56 million, or 3%9%, ~~was~~ primarily due to lower volumes in our North America markets compared to strong North America markets in the previous year, a decline in BDP due to a decrease of units in operation, ~~and~~ decreased export parts sales due to economic conditions in our export markets, ~~partially offset by improvements~~and unfavorable movements in ~~our North America markets. In the first nine months of 2015, the Parts segment net sales were flat, as improvements~~foreign currency exchange rates, primarily in ~~our North America markets were offset by a decline in BDP due to a decrease of units in operation~~Canada and decreased export parts sales due to economic conditions in our export markets. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, sales in the North America commercial parts channel increased by $11 million and $73 million, or 2% and 5%, compared to the respective comparable periods in 2014.Mexico.

The Global Operations segment net sales decrease of ~~$124 million and $325~~$60 million, or ~~53% and 45%~~39%, ~~respectively,~~ in ~~the third quarter and first nine months of 2015,~~2016, was primarily due to lower volumes and unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates in our South American engine operations due to the economic downturn in ~~Brazil, and decreased revenue of $19 million and $72 million, respectively, in our Brazil truck operations, as the prior year included a large government order.~~Brazil.

The Financial Services segment net revenues ~~increased $3 million and $11~~decreased $1 million, or ~~5% and 6%~~2%, ~~respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2015,~~ primarily due to ~~an increase in the average wholesale notes receivable balances, partially offset by~~ a decline in the average retail notes receivable ~~balances.~~balances and unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates.

Costs of products sold

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, Costs of products sold decreased by ~~$245~~$579 million, reflecting the impact of lower sales in our ~~Global Operations segment,~~Core and global markets, lower ~~BDT~~Ford sales, and the ~~favorable~~ impact of a shift in product mix in our Core markets, partially offset by higher adjustments to pre-existing warranties ~~higher sales in our Core markets~~ and an increase ~~of $10 million~~ in our used truck reserves. In ~~addition, in~~ the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015, the Company recognized charges~~2016, we recorded a charge for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $3$5 million compared to a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of ~~$29 million in the third quarter of 2014.~~

In the first nine months of 2015, Costs of products sold decreased by $322 million, reflecting the impact of lower sales in our Global Operations segment, lower Ford sales through our BDT joint venture, and lower adjustments to pre-existing warranties, partially offset by higher sales in our Core markets and an increase of $41 million in our used truck reserves compared to the first nine months of 2014. In addition, Costs of products sold during the first nine months of 2015 was favorably impacted by a shift in product mix in our Core markets. In the first nine months of 2015, the Company recorded a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $36 million compared to charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $65$57 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2014. The improvement in adjustments to pre-existing warranties for 2015 reflects quality improvements in recent model years and continued efforts by the Company to reduce overall cost per repair. Additionally, in the first nine months of 2014, the Truck segment recognized charges of $34 million related to the extended warranty contracts on our 2010 emission standard MaxxForce Big-Bore engines.2015. For more information on our estimated warranty obligations, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, ~~to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Restructuring Charges~~

We recognized restructuring charges of $13 million and $22 million, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, compared to charges of $16 million and $27 million in the respective prior year periods. In the third quarter of 2015, we incurred restructuring charges of $13 million related to cost reduction actions, including a reduction-in-force in the U.S. and Brazil. In the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant, based on a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada. The ruling was upheld in a July 2015 decision issued by the Divisional Court of Ontario. The Company is appealing that decision in the Court of Appeal for Ontario. In addition, in the second quarter of 2014, we incurred restructuring charges of $8 million related to cost reduction actions that included a reduction-in-force in the U.S. For more information, see Note 2, ~~Restructuring and Impairments, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~

~~Asset impairment charges~~

We recognized asset impairment charges of $7 million and $15 million, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2015. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that $3 million of trademarks asset carrying value was impaired. In addition, during the third quarter of 2015, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to certain long-lived assets in the Truck segment. As a result, certain long-lived assets were determined to be impaired, resulting in a charge of $3 million. In addition, in the first nine months of 2015, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to certain operating leases, which resulted in the Truck segment recording $7 million of asset impairment charges.

We recognized asset impairment charges of $4 million and $173 million, respectively, in the third quarter and first nine months of 2014. In the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a non-cash charge of $149 million for the impairment of certain intangible assets of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and trademark for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired. For more information, see Note 1, ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~

In addition, in the first nine months of 2014, the North America Truck segment recorded asset impairment charges of $23 million, of which $19 million was the result of a triggering event relating to the determination that certain assets were held-for-sale, reflecting our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. For more information, see Note 2, ~~Restructurings and Impairments~~, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

The Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decrease of ~~$21 million and $13~~$36 million in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and~~of 2016 as compared to the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2015 ~~respectively, reflects~~is primarily due to the impact of our cost-reduction initiatives ~~partially offset by an increase~~and a decrease in compensation ~~expense~~expense.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, we offered the majority of our U.S.-based non-represented salaried employees the opportunity to apply for a voluntary separation program ("VSP"). Along with the VSP, in the third quarter of 2015, we used attrition and ~~post-retirement related costs.~~an involuntary reduction in force to eliminate additional positions in order to meet our targeted reductions goal. In addition to these actions in the U.S., our Brazilian operations utilized an involuntary reduction in force to eliminate positions. As a result of these actions, we have realized year-over-year savings. For more information on these initiatives, see Note 2, Restructurings and Impairments, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Engineering and product development costs

The Engineering and product development costs decrease of ~~$9 million and $27~~$21 million in ~~the third quarter and first nine months of~~2016 as compared to 2015 ~~respectively, is~~was primarily ~~due~~driven by our efforts to ~~decreased spend~~focus spending on our ~~SCR-related projects, partially offset by~~Core markets while putting less emphasis on engine development. Engineering spend is targeted at programs that will reduce cost, improve uptime for our customers, grow market share and allow us to meet new ~~investments~~emissions standards in 2017. Over the next two years, we expect to introduce new vehicles across our ~~Truck segment, particularly Class 8 trucks, vocational trucks and buses, and increased spend on projects focused on 2017 greenhouse gas ("GHG") emission integration.~~entire product line.

Interest expense

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, interest expense ~~was comparable to the third quarter of 2014. In the first nine months of 2015, interest expense decreased $7~~increased $4 million compared to the ~~corresponding~~ prior year, ~~period,~~ primarily driven by ~~a decrease in our outstanding Manufacturing operations debt balance compared to 2014. In addition, interest expense in~~ the first nine months of 2014 was favorably impacted by the purchase of certain manufacturing equipment that was previously accounted for as a financing arrangement, related to a sale and leaseback transaction.

~~The change in our average outstanding debt balance was primarily the result of the repurchase of a portion~~refinancing of our ~~3.00% senior subordinated convertible notes ("2014 Convertible Notes")~~Amended Term Loan Credit Facility with a new Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility in April 2014 and the repayment of the remainder of our 2014 Convertible Notes in October 2014, partially offset by the private sale of our 4.75% senior subordinated convertible notes due April 2019 ("2019 Convertible Notes") in April 2014.August 2015.

Other income, net

We recognized Other income of ~~$6 million and $37~~$22 million in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015, respectively,~~2016 compared to income of ~~$11 million and $5~~$3 million in the comparable prior year ~~periods.~~period. The increase in Other income is primarily driven by a $15 million one-time fee received from a third party in the first quarter of 2016.

Income tax (expense) benefit

In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized an income tax benefit from continuing operations of $5 million compared to an income tax expense of $7 million in the first quarter of 2015. The difference in the income tax benefit in 2016 and the expense in 2015 is primarily due to the $13 million income tax benefit from the 2016 release of the valuation allowance on U.S. AMT credits. This is the result of new tax legislation, which allows us to forego bonus depreciation in exchange for refunds of previously paid AMT. The income tax benefit in ~~the third quarter and first nine months~~2016 also included income tax expense of ~~2015 primarily consists of gains~~$2 million related to foreign exchange ~~hedges, offset by fluctuations~~gains compared to an income tax benefit of $2 million related to foreign exchange ~~rates, particularly due to the weakening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. dollar. In addition, the income~~ in the first ~~nine months of 2015 consists of a $14 million gain related to settlement of a customer dispute, a $5 million tax credit, and gains on asset sales.~~

~~The income in the third~~ quarter of 2014 consisted of a gain recognized due to the release of an asset retirement obligation associated with the purchase of certain leased manufacturing assets and a net favorable impact from foreign exchange rates, offset by $11 million of charges related to the repurchase of a portion of our 2014 Convertible Notes, which primarily consisted of the write-off of related discount and debt issuance costs. Additionally, the expense in the first nine months of 2014 included a net unfavorable impact of $17 million due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, particularly in the Corporate and Eliminations due to the weakening of the Canadian Dollar against the U.S. Dollar, as well as in the Global Operations segment due to the weakening of the Brazilian Real against the U.S. Dollar.

~~Income tax expense~~

In the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, we recognized income tax expense from continuing operations of $12 million and $37 million, respectively, compared to income tax expense of $14 million and $25 million in the comparable prior year periods.2015. The difference between the income tax expense in the first nine months of 2015 and 2014 is due to geographical mix and certain discrete items. The income tax expense in the first nine months of 2014 included: (i) a net expense of $14 million for tax benefits recognized on losses offset with the establishment of a valuation allowance of $29 million on our deferred tax assets related to our Brazilian operations, (ii) a tax benefit in continuing operations of $13 million resulting from the application of the intraperiod tax allocation rules due to the issuance of our 2019 Convertible Notes and the repurchase of our 2014 Convertible Notes, and (iii) a tax benefit of $8 million due to a decrease in uncertain tax positions.

~~In the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, the~~remaining impact of income taxes onin both periods from U.S. operations was ~~limited~~attributable to current state income taxes, and other discrete items, due in part to the ~~deferred tax~~ valuation allowances on most of our U.S. deferred tax assets.

At October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we had ~~$2.7~~$2.6 billion of U.S. federal net operating ~~losses~~loss carryforwards and ~~$240~~$252 million of federal tax credit carryforwards. We expect our cash payments of U.S. taxes will be minimal for as long as we are able to offset our U.S. taxable income by these U.S. net operating losses and tax credits, which have carryforward periods of up to 20 years. We also have U.S. state and foreign net operating losses that are available to reduce cash payments of U.S. state and foreign taxes in future periods. We maintain valuation allowances on most of our U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets because it is ~~more-likely-than-not~~more likely than not that those deferred tax assets will not be realized. It is reasonably possible within the next twelve months that an additional valuation allowance may be required on certain foreign deferred tax assets. For more information, see Note 8, Income Taxes, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests is the result of our consolidation of subsidiaries that we do not wholly own. Substantially all of our net income attributable to non-controlling interests in ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 relates to Ford's non-controlling interest in BDP.

Segment Results of Continuing Operations

We define segment profit (loss) as net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to NIC excluding income tax benefit (expense). The following sections analyze operating results as they relate to our four segments and do not include intersegment eliminations. For additional information concerning our segments, see Note 12, Segment Reporting, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Truck Segment


	Three Months Ended July 31,									% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except % change)	2015			2014			Change					2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change				% Change
Truck segment sales, net	$	1,834		$	2,002		$	(168	)	% Change	(8	)%		$	5,470			$	5,342			$	128		% Change			2	%	$	1,132			$	1,705			$	(573	)	(34	)%
Truck segment loss	(36		)	(3		)	(33		)	N.M.			(105		)		(340		)		235				(69	)%	(51		)		(18		)		(33		)		N.M.

Segment sales

~~In the third quarter of 2015, the~~The Truck segment net sales ~~decrease of $168~~decreased $573 million, or 8%34%, ~~was primarily~~ due to lower Core truck volumes, a ~~decrease~~decline of $158 million in Ford sales through ~~the~~our BDT joint venture, as production of Ford vehicles ceased in 2015, and a decline in our export truck operations, particularly in Colombia and Venezuela. On May 29, 2015, we acquired all of Ford's remaining 25% ownership in the BDT joint venture. For more information on the BDT joint venture, see Note 1, ~~Summary of Significant Accounting Policies~~, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These decreases were partially offset by improved Core truck volumes and increased military sales. Truck chargeouts in the third quarter of 2015 from our Core markets were up 5%, reflecting a 22% increase in Class 8 severe service trucks, a 13% increase in school buses and a 6% increase in Class 6 and 7 medium trucks, partially offset by a 4% decrease of Class 8 heavy trucks compared to the third quarter of 2014.

~~In the first nine months of 2015, the Truck segment net sales increase of $128 million, or 2%, was primarily due to improved Core truck volumes and an increase in military sales.~~operations. Truck chargeouts from our Core markets were ~~up 10%~~down 19%, reflecting a ~~19% increase~~33% decrease in school buses, a 3% decrease in Class 6 and 7 medium trucks, a ~~15% increase in Class 8 severe service trucks, a 3% increase~~25% decrease in Class 8 heavy trucks, and a ~~10% increase~~15% decrease in ~~school buses. These improvements were partially offset by a decline in our export truck and used truck operations and a decline in Ford sales through the BDT joint venture.~~Class 8 severe service trucks.

Segment loss

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, the Truck segment loss increased by $33 million, primarily driven by a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014~~2015 and an increase in our used truck reserves, partially offset by improved SG&A and Engineering costs, higher Other income, and lower accelerated depreciation charges of ~~$10 million.~~ $11 million in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the comparable prior year period.

In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, the Truck segment recorded charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $3$5 million compared to a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of ~~$32~~$55 million in the third quarter of 2014. In the first nine months of 2015, the Truck segment improved its segment loss by $235 million primarily driven by lower charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties, partially offset by an increase in our used truck reserves of $41 million, and higher accelerated depreciation charges of $21 million. In the first nine months of 2015, the Truck segment recorded a benefit for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $33 million compared to charges for adjustments to pre-existing warranties of $62 million in the first nine months of 2014. The change in adjustments to pre-existing warranties reflects quality improvements in recent model years and continued efforts by the Company to reduce overall cost per repair. In addition, gross margin throughout 2015 was favorably impacted by a shift in product mix in our Core markets, offset by accelerated depreciation charges of $28 million in the first nine months of 2015 for certain assets related to the foundry facilities, compared to accelerated depreciation charges of $7 million in the first nine months of 2014. For more information, see Note 2, ~~Restructurings and Impairments, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~2015.

SG&A expenses and Engineering and product development costs continued to decline in ~~the third quarter and first nine months of 2015. The lower~~2016. SG&A expenses ~~reflect~~decreased by $9 million reflecting the impact of our cost-reduction initiatives. ~~The lower~~ Engineering and product development costs ~~were~~decreased by $18 million, primarily ~~due~~driven by our efforts to ~~decreased~~focus spending on our ~~SCR-related projects, partially offset by~~Core markets while putting less emphasis on engine development. Engineering spend is targeted at programs that will reduce cost, improve uptime for our customers, grow market share and allow us to meet new ~~investments~~emissions standards in 2017. Over the next two years, we expect to introduce new vehicles across our ~~Truck segment, particularly Class 8 trucks, vocational trucks and buses, and increased spend on projects focused on 2017 GHG emission integration.~~entire product line.

Additionally, in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2015,~~2016, the segment recorded ~~asset impairment charges of $12~~a $15 million ~~compared to $23 million~~one-time fee received from a third party, which was recognized in the first nine months of 2014. The charges in 2015 were for certain long-lived assets and operating leases, while $19 million of the charges in 2014 were for certain intangible and long-lived assets and reflect our ongoing evaluation of our portfolio of assets to validate their strategic and financial fit. For more information on the other asset impairment charges, see Note 2, ~~Restructurings and Impairments~~Other income, net~~, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.~~.

5444

Parts Segment


	Three Months Ended July 31,							% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except % change)	2015		2014		Change					2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change			% Change
Parts segment sales, net	$	625	$	644	$	(19	)	% Change	(3	)%		$	1,864			$	1,860			$	4		% Change			—	%	$	570		$	626		$	(56	)	(9	)%
Parts segment profit	151		137		14			10	%		429				378				51				13	%	150				145			5			3	%

Segment sales

~~In the third quarter of 2015, the~~The Parts segment net sales ~~decrease of $19~~decreased $56 million, or 3%9%, isprimarily due to lower volumes in our North America markets compared to strong North America markets in the previous year, a decline in BDP due to a decrease of units in operation, ~~and~~ decreased export parts sales due to economic conditions in our export ~~markets. The decline is partially offset by improvements~~markets, and unfavorable movements in ~~our North America markets. In the first nine months of 2015, the Parts segment net sales were comparable to the first nine months of 2014, as improvements~~foreign currency exchange rates, primarily in ~~our North America markets were offset by a decline in BDP due to a decrease of units in operation~~Canada and decreased export parts sales due to economic conditions in our export markets. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, sales in the North America commercial parts channel increased by $11 million and $73 million, or 2% and 5%, respectively, compared to respective prior year periods.Mexico.

Segment profit

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015,~~2016, the Parts segment ~~improved~~increased its segment profit by ~~$14~~$5 million, ~~and $51 million, respectively,~~or 3%, primarily due to ~~margin improvements in our commercial markets. The increase in the Parts segment profit was also due to lower intercompany "access fees" and~~ the impact of our cost-reduction ~~initiatives.~~initiatives and lower intercompany access fees, partially offset by the decline in our commercial markets. Access fees are allocated to the Parts segment from the Truck segment, primarily for development of new products, and consist of certain engineering and product development costs, depreciation expense, and SG&A. The lower fees in ~~2015~~2016 are due to cost-reduction initiatives in the Truck segment.

Global Operations Segment


	Three Months Ended July 31,									% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except % change)	2015			2014			Change					2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change				% Change
Global Operations segment sales, net	$	109		$	233		$	(124	)	% Change	(53	)%		$	391			$	716			$	(325	)	% Change			(45	)%	$	92			$	152		$	(60	)	(39	)%
Global Operations segment loss	(26		)	(21		)	(5		)	24	%		(40		)		(218		)		178				(82	)%	(13		)		(15		)		2			(13	)%

Segment sales

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015,~~2016, the Global Operations segment net sales decrease of ~~$124~~$60 million, ~~and $325 million, respectively,~~or 39%, was primarily driven by a decrease ~~of $106 million and $253 million, respectively,~~ in our South America engine operations, reflecting lower volumes and unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange ~~rates.~~rates, as the average conversion rate of the Brazilian Real to the U.S. dollar has weakened by 33% for the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period last year. The continued economic downturn in the Brazil economy has contributed to lower engine volumes of ~~42% and 37%, respectively,~~18% in ~~the third quarter and first nine months of 2015~~2016 compared to the comparable prior year periods. The decrease in 2015 was also attributable to a decrease in revenue of $19 million and $72 million, respectively, from our Brazil truck operations, as the prior year included a large government order.period.

Segment loss

~~In the third quarter of 2015, the~~The Global Operations segment ~~loss increased~~results improved by $5$2 million, ~~compared to 2014,~~or 13%, over the comparable prior year period primarily due to restructuring charges related to a reduction-in-force in Brazil, unfavorable movements in foreign currency exchange rates, and $3 million in impairment charges. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that $3 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired. These charges were partially offset by lower manufacturing and structural costs as a result of our prior year restructuring and cost-reduction efforts.

In the first nine months of 2015, the Global Operations segment results improved by $178 million over the comparable prior year period primarily due to non-cash charges of $149 million for the impairment of the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and the related trademark during the second quarter of 2014. As a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results in 2014, we tested the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and trademark for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired.

Excluding the impact of the prior year impairment, the Global Operations segment results improved by $29 million in the first nine months of 2015 over the comparable prior year period. The results in 2015 reflect a $10 million net gain related to a settlement of a customer dispute. The remaining improvements in the segment are primarily due to lower manufacturing and structural costs as a result of our restructuring and cost-reduction efforts, partially offset by the decreased results of our Brazil truck operations, including a $6 million inventory charge related to our efforts to right-size the truck business due to the current economic conditions in Brazil.

Financial Services Segment


	Three Months Ended July 31,						% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,												% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions, except % change)	2015		2014		Change				2015				2014				Change				2016				2015				Change			% Change
Financial Services segment revenues, net	$	63	$	60	$	3	% Change	5	%		$	183			$	172			$	11		% Change			6	%	$	59		$	60		$	(1	)	(2	)%
Financial Services segment profit	26		24		2		8	%		72				71				1				1	%	26				24			2			8	%

Segment revenues

In the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2015,~~2016, net revenues in the Financial Services segment ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$3 million and $11~~$1 million, or ~~5% and 6%~~2%, ~~respectively,~~ primarily driven by ~~an increase in the average wholesale notes receivable balances and higher revenues from operating leases, partially offset by~~ a ~~decline~~decrease in the average retail notes receivable ~~balances.~~balances, partially offset by higher revenues from operating leases. The decline in the average retail notes receivable balance is primarily due to the continued liquidation of our U.S. retail portfolio and unfavorable movements in foreign currency in our Mexican retail portfolio.

Segment profit

~~In the third quarter and first nine months of 2015, the~~The Financial Services segment profit ~~was comparable~~increased by $2 million, or 8%, primarily due to ~~the prior year as~~ an increase in ~~revenue and~~gains on lease terminations, a decrease in the provision for loan losses, ~~were~~and cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by a decrease in revenue and lower interest income from intercompany loans.

Supplemental Information

The following tables provide additional information on truck industry retail units, market share data, order units, backlog units, and chargeout ~~units, and engine shipments.~~units. These tables present key metrics and trends that provide quantitative measures on the performance of the Truck and Global Operations segments.

Truck Industry Retail Deliveries

The following table summarizes approximate industry retail deliveries for our Core truck market, categorized by relevant class, according to Wards Communications and R.L. Polk & Co. ("Polk"): and our Core retail deliveries:


	Three Months Ended July 31,			% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,						% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in units)	2015	2014	Change			2015		2014		Change		2016				2015		Change		% Change
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)				% Change									% Change
School buses	4,800	4,800	—	—	%		14,900		13,900		1,000		7	%	6,300		5,700		600		11	%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks	20,500	17,900	2,600	15	%		58,500		53,100		5,400		10	%	20,700		18,000		2,700		15	%
Class 8 heavy trucks	61,000	48,900	12,100	25	%		163,100		134,100		29,000		22	%	47,700		50,400		(2,700	)	(5	)%
Class 8 severe service trucks	17,000	15,300	1,700	11	%		46,000		39,500		6,500		16	%	14,300		14,300		—		—	%
Total Core markets	103,300	86,900	16,400	19	%		282,500		240,600		41,900		17	%
Total Core Markets															89,000		88,400		600		1	%
Combined class 8 trucks	78,000	64,200	13,800	21	%		209,100		173,600		35,500		20	%	62,000		64,700		(2,700	)	(4	)%
Navistar Core retail deliveries	16,200	14,100	2,100	15	%		44,700		40,700		4,000		10	%	12,800		13,000		(200	)	(2	)%

Truck Retail Delivery Market Share

The following table summarizes our approximate retail delivery market share percentages for the Class 6 through 8 U.S. and Canada truck markets, based on market-wide information from Wards Communications and Polk:


	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
	July 31, 2015		April 30, 2015		January 31, 2015		October 31, 2014		July 31, 2014		January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015		July 31, 2015		April 30, 2015		January 31, 2015
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks	24	%	27	%	21	%	19	%	20	%	20	%	19	%	24	%	27	%	21	%
Class 8 heavy trucks	12	%	12	%	10	%	15	%	14	%	10	%	11	%	12	%	12	%	10	%
Class 8 severe service trucks	15	%	15	%	14	%	14	%	15	%	16	%	15	%	15	%	15	%	14	%
Combined class 8 trucks	13	%	13	%	11	%	15	%	14	%	11	%	12	%	13	%	13	%	11	%

Truck Orders, net

We define orders as written commitments received from customers and dealers during the year to purchase trucks. Net orders represent new orders received during the year less cancellations of orders made during the same year. Orders do not represent guarantees of purchases by customers or dealers and are subject to cancellation. Orders may be either sold orders, which will be built for specific customers, or stock orders, which will generally be built for dealer inventory for eventual sale to customers. These orders may be placed at our assembly plants in the U.S. and Mexico for destinations anywhere in the world and include trucks and buses. Historically, we have had an increase in net orders for stock inventory from our dealers at the end of the year due to a combination of demand and, from time to time, incentives to the dealers. Increases in stock orders typically translate to higher future chargeouts. The following table summarizes our approximate net orders for Core units:


	Three Months Ended July 31,			% Change			Nine Months Ended July 31,							% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in units)	2015	2014	Change			2015		2014		Change			2016				2015		Change		% Change
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)				% Change										% Change
School buses	2,500	2,100	400	19	%		8,500		7,200		1,300			18	%	2,000		2,500		(500	)	(20	)%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks	2,900	2,700	200	7	%		11,900		12,900		(1,000	)		(8	)%	5,300		4,600		700		15	%
Class 8 heavy trucks	8,100	7,600	500	7	%		21,800		22,400		(600	)		(3	)%	4,100		8,100		(4,000	)	(49	)%
Class 8 severe service trucks	2,000	2,000	—	—	%		6,800		6,600		200			3	%	2,400		2,000		400		20	%
Total Core Markets	15,500	14,400	1,100	8	%		49,000		49,100		(100	)		—	%	13,800		17,200		(3,400	)	(20	)%
Combined class 8 trucks	10,100	9,600	500	5	%		28,600		29,000		(400	)		(1	)%	6,500		10,100		(3,600	)	(36	)%

Truck Backlogs

We define order backlogs ("backlogs") as orders yet to be built as of the end of the period. Our backlogs do not represent guarantees of purchases by customers or dealers and are subject to cancellation. Although the backlog of unbuilt orders is one of many indicators of market demand, other factors such as changes in production rates, internal and supplier available capacity, new product introductions, and competitive pricing actions may affect point-in-time comparisons. Backlogs exclude units in inventory awaiting additional modifications or delivery to the end customer. The following table summarizes our approximate backlog for Core units:


	As of July 31,				% Change		Three Months Ended January 31,
(in units)	2015	2014	Change		% Change		2016	2015	Change		% Change
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses	2,000	2,300	(300	)	(13	)%	1,600	2,100	(500	)	(24	)%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks	4,600	5,300	(700	)	(13	)%	6,100	7,200	(1,100	)	(15	)%
Class 8 heavy trucks	15,000	12,800	2,200		17	%	13,700	15,300	(1,600	)	(10	)%
Class 8 severe service trucks	2,100	2,100	—		—	%	2,800	2,300	500		22	%
Total Core Markets	23,700	22,500	1,200		5	%	24,200	26,900	(2,700	)	(10	)%
Combined class 8 trucks	17,100	14,900	2,200		15	%	16,500	17,600	(1,100	)	(6	)%

Truck Chargeouts

We define chargeouts as trucks that have been invoiced to customers. The units held in dealer inventory represent the principal difference between retail deliveries and chargeouts. The following table summarizes our approximate worldwide chargeouts from our continuing operations:

Three Months Ended July 31, % Change Nine Months Ended July 31, % Change
(in units) 2015 2014 Change 2015 2014 Change
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses 3,500
3,100
400
13 % 8,500
7,700
800
10 %
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks 3,800
3,600
200
6 % 14,500
12,200
2,300
19 %
Class 8 heavy trucks 7,000
7,300
(300 ) (4 )% 19,100
18,600
500
3 %
Class 8 severe service trucks 2,800
2,300
500
22 % 7,100
6,200
900
15 %
Total Core Markets 17,100
16,300
800
5 % 49,200
44,700
4,500
10 %
Non "core" military 100
—
100
— % 100
100
—
— %
Other markets^(A)
2,900
7,600
(4,700 ) (62 )% 15,300
19,800
(4,500 ) (23 )%
Total worldwide unit 20,100
23,900
(3,800 ) (16 )% 64,600
64,600
—
— %
Combined class 8 trucks 9,800
9,600
200
2 % 26,200
24,800
1,400
6 %



	Three Months Ended January 31,
(in units)	2016	2015	Change		% Change
Core Markets (U.S. and Canada)
School buses	1,800	2,700	(900	)	(33	)%
Class 6 and 7 medium trucks	3,900	4,000	(100	)	(3	)%
Class 8 heavy trucks	3,600	4,800	(1,200	)	(25	)%
Class 8 severe service trucks	1,700	2,000	(300	)	(15	)%
Total Core Markets	11,000	13,500	(2,500	)	(19	)%
Other markets^(A)	1,700	7,000	(5,300	)	(76	)%
Total worldwide units	12,700	20,500	(7,800	)	(38	)%
Combined class 8 trucks	5,300	6,800	(1,500	)	(22	)%

_____________________________

(A)

Other markets primarily consist of Export Truck and Mexico and also include chargeouts related to BDT of ~~3,100~~3,400 units during the ~~three months ended July 31, 2014, and 6,000 and 7,600 during the nine months ended July 31, 2015 and 2014.~~first quarter of 2015. There were no third party chargeouts related to BDT during the three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 as Ford no longer purchases ~~through~~ from BDT.

~~Engine Shipments~~

Three Months Ended July 31, % Change Nine Months Ended July 31, % Change
(in units) 2015 2014 Change 2015 2014 Change
OEM sales-South America 11,400
21,400
(10,000 ) (47 )% 38,700
65,700
(27,000 ) (41 )%
Intercompany sales 6,600
9,800
(3,200 ) (33 )% 20,200
30,400
(10,200 ) (34 )%
Other OEM sales 1,800
2,900
(1,100 ) (38 )% 7,300
8,500
(1,200 ) (14 )%
Total sales 19,800
34,100
(14,300 ) (42 )% 66,200
104,600
(38,400 ) (37 )%

5847

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	As of						As of
(in millions)	July 31, 2015		October 31, 2014		July 31, 2014		January 31, 2016		October 31, 2015		January 31, 2015
Consolidated cash and cash equivalents	$	547	$	497	$	547	$	579	$	912	$	620
Consolidated marketable securities	293		605		618		152		159		175
Consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities	$	840	$	1,102	$	1,165	$	731	$	1,071	$	795

Cash Requirements

~~We generate~~Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operating activities, including cash flow from the sale of trucks, buses, diesel engines, and parts, as well as from product financing provided to our dealers and retail customers by our Financial Services operations. It is our opinion that, in the absence of significant extraordinary cash demands, our: (i) level of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, ~~and~~ (ii) current and forecasted cash flow from our Manufacturing operations and Financial Services operations, and (iii) financing capacities, will provide sufficient funds to meet operating requirements, capital expenditures, equity investments, and financial obligations ~~during the next twelve months.~~both on a short-term and long-term basis. Future Manufacturing operations debt obligations are expected to be met through a combination of cash generation from operations and refinancing activities. We also believe that collections on our outstanding receivables portfolios, as well as funds available from various funding sources, will permit our Financial Services operations to meet the financing requirements of our dealers.

Our Manufacturing operations are generally able to access sufficient sources of financing to support our business plan. ~~In July 2014,~~The availability under our ~~amended and restated asset-based credit agreement in an aggregate principal amount of~~ $175 million (the "Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility") was amended to remove used truck inventory from the borrowing base. Additionally, the calculation of availability was revised to include cash collateral posted to support outstanding designated letters of credit, subject to a $40 million cap, and the cash management provisions were amended to reflect intercreditor arrangements with respect to a financing with NFC secured by a first priority lien on used truck inventory (and certain related assets) (the "Intercompany Used Truck Loan"). On July 15, 2015, the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility ~~was further amended~~is subject to ~~(i) permit the incurrence~~a $35 million liquidity block, less outstanding standby letters of upcredit issued under this facility, and is impacted by inventory levels at certain aftermarket parts inventory locations. As of January 31, 2016, we had limited availability to $352.5 million of additional term loans and the issuance of up to $200 million of additional senior notes, (ii) increase the permitted receivables financing from $25 million to $50 million, and (iii) modify the cash dominion trigger and certain of the definitional provisions. As a consequence of the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility (as discussed below), the maturity date of the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facility was extended by one year to May 18, 2018. The amendments had no impact on the aggregate commitment levelborrow under the Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit ~~Facility, which remains at $175 million. During 2014,~~Facility. However, we maintain capacity under our various debt arrangements to incur incremental debt. In addition, the covenants in all of our debt agreements permit us to refinance existing debt instruments as they mature. NFC ~~made~~makes secured intercompany loans to our Manufacturing operations under the Intercompany Used Truck ~~Loan of $181 million.~~Loan. During the ~~first nine~~three months ~~of 2015,~~ended January 31, 2016 we increased our borrowings under the Intercompany Used Truck Loan by ~~$28~~$50 million to ~~$209 million and also~~$168 million. During 2015, we received $125 million in dividends from ~~NFC.~~NFC, of which $80 million ~~of the dividends paid by NFC~~ were funded by the partial repayment of an intercompany loan to ~~NFC~~NFC. Subsequent to the quarter, during March 2016, we received $30 million in dividends from NFC.

The Financial Services segment has traditionally relied upon secured borrowings on finance receivables, short and ~~were therefore cash neutral~~long-term bank borrowings, medium and long-term debt, and commercial paper in Mexico to ~~NFC~~fund its provision of financing to our dealers and ~~NIC.~~

~~In August 2015, the Amended Term Loan Credit Facility was refinanced with~~retail customers. We use a ~~new Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility (“Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility”~~number of SPEs to securitize and sell receivables. Navistar Financial Securities Corporation ("NFSC") finances wholesale notes, Navistar Financial Retail Receivables Corporation ("NFRRC") finances retail notes and finance leases, International Truck Leasing Corporation ("ITLC") finances operating leases and some finance leases, and Truck Retail Accounts Corporation ("TRAC") finances retail accounts. Our Mexican financial services operations include Navistar Financial, S.A. de C.V., Sociedad Financiera de Objeto Multiple, Entidad No Regulada ("NFM"), ~~for $1.04 billion. Under the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility, (i) the maturity date was extended~~and Navistar Comercial S.A. de C.V., which provide vehicle financing and insurance to ~~August 7, 2020, (ii) interest rate margins were increased to 5.50% for Eurodollar rate loans~~our dealers and 4.50% for base rate loans, (iii) the Eurodollar rate “floor” was reduced to 1.00%, (iv) the permitted receivables financing basket was increased from $25 million to $50 million, (v) certain prepaymentsretail customers in Mexico. As of the Amended Term Loan Credit Facility made prior to August 7, 2017 will be made subject to a call premium of 1.00%, (vi) certain definitional provisions, including those related to asset dispositions were modified, and (vii) quarterly principal amortization payments of 0.25% ofJanuary 31, 2016, the aggregate ~~principal~~ amount are required, with the balance due at maturity. As noted above, as a consequence of the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Facility refinancing, the maturity date of Navistar, Inc.’s Amended and Restated Asset-Based Credit Facilityavailable to fund finance receivables under our financial services facilities was ~~extended from May 18, 2017 to May 18, 2018.~~

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company completed the private sale of $411 million of our 2019 Convertible Notes, including a portion of the underwriters' over-allotment options. The Company used the net proceeds from our 2019 Convertible Notes, as well as cash on-hand, to repurchase $404 million of notional amount of our 2014 Convertible Notes. In conjunction with the repurchases, the Company unwound a portion of the call options and warrants associated with the repurchased 2014 Convertible Notes. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company repaid the remainder of the 2014 Convertible Notes and the remaining purchased call options expired worthless.$526 million.

Consolidated cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was ~~$840~~$731 million at ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, which includes ~~$15~~$3 million of cash and cash equivalents attributable to BDP, as well as an immaterial amount of cash and cash equivalents of certain VIEs that is generally not available to satisfy our obligations. For additional information on the consolidation of BDP, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

5948

Cash Flow Overview

Nine Months Ended July 31, 2015
(in millions) Manufacturing
Operations Financial Services Operations and Adjustments Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 35
$ (49 ) $ (14 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 257
(252 ) 5
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (177 ) 263
86
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (48 ) 21
(27 )
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 67
(17 ) 50
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period 440
57
497
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $ 507
$ 40
$ 547


	Nine Months Ended July 31, 2014									Three Months Ended January 31, 2016
(in millions)	Manufacturing Operations			Financial Services Operations and Adjustments			Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows			Manufacturing Operations			Financial Services Operations and Adjustments			Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(264	)	$	(80	)	$	(344	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	132			(118		)	14
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(71		)	205			134
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities										$	(275	)	$	173		$	(102	)
Net cash used in investing activities										(20		)	(39		)	(59		)
Net cash used in financing activities										(31		)	(144		)	(175		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(7		)	(5		)	(12		)	(7		)	10			3
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(210		)	2			(208		)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents										(333		)	—			(333		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	727			28			755			877			35			912
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	517		$	30		$	547		$	544		$	35		$	579



	Three Months Ended January 31, 2015
(in millions)	Manufacturing Operations			Financial Services Operations and Adjustments			Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(143	)	$	(68	)	$	(211	)
Net cash provided by investing activities	412			45			457
Net cash used in financing activities	(109		)	—			(109		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(17		)	3			(14		)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	143			(20		)	123
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	440			57			497
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	583		$	37		$	620

_____________________

Manufacturing operations cash flows and Financial Services operations cash flows are not presented in accordance with, and should not be viewed as an alternative to, GAAP. This non-GAAP financial information should be considered supplemental to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. However, we believe that non-GAAP reporting ~~giving effect to the adjustments shown in the reconciliation above,~~ provides meaningful information and therefore we use it to supplement our GAAP reporting by identifying items that may not be related to the core manufacturing business. Management often uses this information to assess and measure the performance and liquidity of our operating segments. Our Manufacturing operations, for this purpose, include our Truck segment, Global Operations segment, Parts segment, and Corporate items which include certain eliminations. The reconciling differences between these non-GAAP financial measures and our GAAP consolidated financial statements in Item 1, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, are our Financial Services operations and adjustments required to eliminate certain intercompany transactions between Manufacturing operations and Financial Services operations. Our Financial Services operations cash flows are presented consistent with their treatment in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and may not be consistent with how they would be treated on a stand-alone basis. We have chosen to provide this supplemental information to allow additional analysis, ~~of operating results,~~ to illustrate the respective cash flows giving effect to the ~~non-GAAP adjustments~~equity basis cash flow shown ~~in the~~ above, ~~reconciliation~~ and to provide an additional measure of performance and liquidity.

Manufacturing Operations

Manufacturing Operations Cash Flow from Operating Activities

Cash ~~provided by operating activities was $35 million in the nine months ended July 31, 2015 compared to cash~~ used in operating activities ~~of $264~~was $275 million and $143 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2014.~~2016 and 2015, respectively. The ~~improvement~~net decrease in cash flow from operating activities in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 was primarily attributable to increases in inventories and noncurrent assets, decreases in accounts payable due to higher payments and decreases in other current liabilities, and lower dividends received from our Financial Services operations, partially offset by a lower net loss, ~~dividends received from NFC, and a decrease~~an increase in ~~inventories, partially offset by net reductions~~the collection of accounts receivable, ~~higher accounts payable payments, changes in other current assets, and changes~~an increase in other noncurrent ~~liabilities.~~liabilities and changes from intercompany transactions with our Financial Services operations.

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was ~~$155~~$67 million and ~~$166~~$60 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively.

Manufacturing Operations Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Cash ~~provided by~~used in investing activities was $~~257 million and $132~~20 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015 and 2014, respectively.~~2016, compared to cash provided by investing activities of $412 million in the three months ended January 31, 2015. The net ~~increase~~decrease in cash flow from investing activities in ~~2015~~2016 compared to ~~2014~~2015 was primarily attributable to ~~lower purchases of equipment leased to others and lower purchases of marketable securities, partially offset by~~ higher capital expenditures and lower sales and ~~less~~ maturities of marketable securities, partially offset by lower purchases of marketable securities.

6049

Manufacturing Operations Cash Flow from Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities was ~~$177~~$31 million and ~~$71~~$109 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, respectively. The net ~~decrease~~change in cash flow from financing activities in ~~2015 compared to 2014~~2016 was primarily attributable to ~~a partial repayment of an~~lower principal repayments under the intercompany loan due to our Financial Services ~~operations and lower proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.~~operations.

Financial Services Operations

Financial Services Operations and Adjustments to Cash Flow from Operating Activities

Cash ~~used in~~provided by operating activities was ~~$49 million and $80~~$173 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in~~2016, compared to cash used in operating activities of $68 million in the three months ended January 31, 2015. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2016 was primarily due to ~~the~~a greater decline in the level of finance receivables funded and the absence of dividends paid to the Manufacturing operations as compared to the prior year period. The increase was partially offset by an increase in ~~finance receivables in~~fundings under the ~~prior year, partially offset by the increase in dividends paid~~Intercompany Used Truck Loan to the Manufacturing operations.

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, was ~~$46 million and $41~~$15 million in both the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014, respectively. The increase was due to the higher~~2015. A decrease in average borrowing levels ~~needed~~used to fund ~~the increase in average~~ finance ~~receivables.~~receivables was offset by slightly higher interest rates.

Financial Services Operations and Adjustments to Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was ~~$252 million and $118~~$39 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015 and 2014, respectively.~~2016, compared to cash provided by investing activities of $45 million in the three months ended January 31, 2015. Changes in restricted cash levels required under our secured borrowings were the primary sources and uses of cash from investing activities in ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014,~~2015, along with purchases of equipment leased to others. In ~~2015,~~the prior year period, restricted cash ~~accumulated for~~was liquidated in conjunction with the ~~payoff~~repayment of ~~maturing~~certain investor notes ~~increased by $160 million. This increase was partially offset by~~and a ~~decline in~~retail securitization. In addition, purchases of equipment leased to ~~others.~~others increased in 2016 compared to 2015.

Financial Services Operations and Adjustments to Cash Flow from Financing Activities

Cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities was ~~$263 million and $205~~$144 million in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015 and 2014, respectively.~~2016, compared to cash used in financing activities of less than $1 million in the three months ended January 31, 2015. The increase in cash used in financing activities in 2016 was primarily due to the repayment of debt associated with the decline in the level of finance receivables funded. The increase was ~~due to~~partially offset by borrowings used ~~for~~to fund the increase in ~~dividends paid~~the Intercompany Used Truck Loan to the Manufacturing ~~operations and the accumulation of principal for payoff of the wholesale investor notes maturing in September 2015, partially offset by a decline in finance receivables and lease funding requirements.~~operations.

Consolidated EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes certain identified items that we do not consider to be part of our ongoing business, are not in accordance with, and should not be viewed as an alternative to, U.S. GAAP. This non-GAAP financial information should be considered supplemental to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

We believe EBITDA provides meaningful information about the performance of our business and therefore we use it to supplement our U.S. GAAP reporting. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA improves the comparability of year-to-year results, and is representative of our underlying performance. Management uses this information to assess and measure the performance of our operating segments. We have chosen to provide this supplemental information to investors, analysts and other interested parties to enable them to perform additional analyses of operating results, to illustrate the results of operations giving effect to the non-GAAP adjustments shown in the below reconciliations, and to provide an additional measure of performance.

EBITDA reconciliation:


	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
Loss from continuing operations attributable to NIC, net of tax	$	(30	)	$	(3	)	$	(136	)	$	(550	)	$	(33	)	$	(42	)
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization expense	68			71			221			256			58			79
Manufacturing interest expense^(A)	56			60			170			182			62			57
Less:
Income tax expense	(12		)	(14		)	(37		)	(25		)
Income tax benefit (expense)													5			(7		)
EBITDA	$	106		$	142		$	292		$	(87	)	$	82		$	101

______________________


(A)	Manufacturing interest expense is the net interest expense primarily generated for borrowings that support the manufacturing and corporate operations, adjusted to eliminate intercompany interest expense with our Financial Services segment. The following table reconciles Manufacturing interest expense to the consolidated interest expense:


	Three Months Ended July 31,				Nine Months Ended July 31,				Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015
Interest expense	$	75	$	78	$	227	$	234	$	81	$	77
Less: Financial services interest expense	19		18		57		52		19		20
Manufacturing interest expense	$	56	$	60	$	170	$	182	$	62	$	57

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation:


	Three Months Ended July 31,					Nine Months Ended July 31,						Three Months Ended January 31,
(in millions)	2015		2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
EBITDA (reconciled above)	$	106	$	142		$	292		$	(87	)	$	82		$	101
Less significant items of:
Adjustments to pre-existing warranties^(A)	3		(29		)	(36		)	65			5			(57		)
Restructuring charges^(B)	13		16			18			27
Asset impairment charges^(C)	7		4			15			173
Gain on settlement^(D)	—		—			(10		)	—
Brazil truck business actions^(E)	—		—			6			—
North America asset impairment charges^(B)												2			7
Cost reduction and other strategic initiatives												3			3
One-time fee received^(C)												(15		)	—
Total adjustments	23		(9		)	(7		)	265			(5		)	(47		)

Adjusted EBITDA	$	129	$	133		$	285		$	178		$	77		$	54

_____________________

(A)

(B)

In the ~~third~~first quarter of 2016, the Truck segment recorded $2 million of asset impairment charges relating to certain long lived assets. In the first quarter of 2015, ~~we incurred restructuring~~the Truck segment recorded $7 million of asset impairment charges ~~of $13 million related~~relating to cost reduction actions, including a reduction-in-force in the U.S. and Brazil. In the third quarter and nine months ended July 31, 2014, we incurred restructuring charges of $16 million and $27 million, respectively, related to cost reduction actions that included a reduction-in-force in the U.S. and Brazil. In addition, in the third quarter of 2014, the Company recognized charges of $14 million related to the 2011 closure of its Chatham, Ontario plant, based on a ruling received from the Financial Services Tribunal in Ontario, Canada.certain operating leases.

(C)

In the third quarter of 2015, as a result of the economic downturn in Brazil causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the indefinite-lived intangible asset of our Brazilian engine reporting unit for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that $3 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired. In addition, during the third quarter of 2015, the Company concluded it had a triggering event related to certain long-lived assets in the Truck segment. As a result, certain long-lived assets were determined to be impaired,resulting in a charge of $3 million. In the second quarter of 2014, we recognized a non-cash charge of $149 million for the impairment of certain intangible assets of our Brazilian engine reporting unit. Due to slower than expected growth in the Brazilian economy causing declines in actual and forecasted results, we tested the goodwill of our Brazilian engine reporting unit and trademark for potential impairment. As a result, we determined that the entire $142 million balance of goodwill and $7 million of trademark asset carrying value was impaired. Additionally, in the first quarter of ~~2014, the Company concluded it had~~2016, we received a ~~triggering event related to potential sales of assets requiring assessment of impairment for certain intangible and long-lived assets~~$15 million one-time fee from a third party which was recognized in ~~the Truck segment. As a result, the Truck segment recognized asset impairment charges of $18 million.~~Other income, net.


~~(D)~~	In the second quarter of 2015, the Global Operations segment recognized a $10 million net gain related to a settlement of a customer dispute. The $10 million net gain for the settlement included restructuring charges of $4 million.


~~(E)~~	~~In the second quarter of 2015, our Global Operations segment recorded $6 million in inventory charges to right size the Brazil Truck business.~~

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

~~The Company’s~~Our pension plans are funded by contributions made from Company assets in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations. The regulatory funding requirements are computed using an actuarially determined funded status, which is determined using assumptions that often differ from assumptions used to measure the funded status for U.S. GAAP. U.S. funding targets are determined by rules promulgated under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the "PPA"). The PPA additionally requires underfunded plans to achieve 100% funding over a period of time. From time to time, we have discussions with and receive requests for certain information from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC"). The PBGC was created by ERISA to encourage the continuation and maintenance of private-sector defined benefit pension plans, provide timely and uninterrupted payment of pension benefits, and keep pension insurance premiums at a minimum. In July 2012, the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21^st Century Act (the "MAP-21 Act") was signed into law, impacting the minimum funding requirements for pension plans, but not otherwise impacting our accounting for pension benefits. In August 2014, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2014 ("HATFA"), ~~including~~which included an extension of pension funding interest rate relief, was signed into law. ~~As a result, we lowered~~The Bi-Partisan Budget Act of 2015 was signed into law in November of 2015 and provided for further extension of interest rate relief. These legislative measures will reduce our funding ~~expectations.~~requirements over the next five years.

Generally, our pension plans are funded by contributions made by us. Our policy is to fund the pension plans in accordance with applicable U.S. and Canadian government regulations and to make additional contributions from time to time.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~July~~January 31, 2016 and 2015, we contributed ~~$11~~$19 million and ~~$73 million respectively, and for the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, we contributed $33 million and $98~~$30 million, respectively, to our U.S. and Canadian pension plans (the "Plans") to meet regulatory minimum funding requirements. We currently anticipate additional contributions of approximately ~~$40~~$80 million during the remainder of ~~2015.~~2016. Future contributions are dependent upon a number of factors, principally the changes in values of plan assets, changes in interest rates, the impact of any future funding relief, and the impact of funding resulting from the closure of our Chatham, Ontario plant. We currently expect that from ~~2016~~2017 through ~~2018, the Company~~2019, we will be required to contribute ~~at least~~ $100 million to $200 million per year to the Plans, depending on asset performance and discount rates.

For more information, see Note 7, Postretirement Benefits, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Other Information

Impact of Environmental Regulation

Government regulation related to climate change is under consideration at the U.S. federal and state levels. Because our products use fossil fuels, they may be impacted indirectly due to regulation, such as a cap and trade program, affecting the cost of fuels. The EPA and the United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ("NHTSA") issued final rules for greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions and fuel economy on September 15, 2011. These began to apply in calendar year 2014 and will be fully implemented in model year 2017. The agencies' stated goals for these rules were to increase the use of currently existing technologies. ~~The Company is~~We are complying with these rules through use of existing technologies and implementation of emerging technologies as they become available. Several of ~~the Company's~~our vehicles were certified early for the 2013 model year and the majority of our remaining vehicles and all engines were certified in 2014. The EPA and NHTSA issued a proposed rule on July 13, 2015 with the next phase of federal GHG emission and fuel economy regulations. This proposed rule contains more stringent emissions levels for engines and vehicles, adds regulation of trailers and is anticipated to take effect in model year 2021 and to be implemented in three stages culminating in model year 2027. The proposed rule is currently under discussion among the relevant agencies, manufacturers, including ~~the Company,~~us, and other stakeholders. ~~The Company is developing formal~~We filed comments ~~and will file those comments in mid-September.~~on October 1, 2015. The final rule is expected in ~~late 2015 or early~~calendar year 2016. Canada adopted its version of fuel economy and/or GHG emission regulations in February 2013. These regulations are substantially aligned with U.S. fuel economy and GHG emission regulations. Canada has announced it also is considering a heavy duty phase 2 greenhouse gas rulemaking aligned with EPA and NHTSA phase 2 rules. In December 2014, California adopted GHG emission rules for heavy duty vehicles equivalent to ~~federal~~ EPA rules and an optional lower emission standard for nitrogen oxide ("NOx") in California. California has stated its intention to lower NOx standards for California-certified engines and has requested that the EPA lower its standards. We expect that heavy duty vehicle and engine fuel economy and GHG emissions rules will be under consideration in other global jurisdictions in the future. These standards will impact development and production costs for vehicles and engines. There will also be administrative costs arising from the implementation of the rules. EPA also issued a ~~proposed~~final rule in ~~December 2014~~October 2015 that ~~would lower~~lowered the National Ambient Air Quality Standard ~~("NAAQS")~~ for ~~ozone. If adopted this~~ozone to 70 parts per billion. This rule could lead to future lower emission standards for substances that contribute to ozone, including NOx from vehicles, at the federal and state levels. ~~The final ozone NAAQS rule is expected in October 2015.~~

Our facilities may be subject to regulation related to climate change and climate change itself may also have some impact on ~~the Company's~~our operations. However, these impacts are currently uncertain and ~~the Company~~we cannot predict the nature and scope of those impacts.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, we use estimates and make judgments and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, and the related disclosures. Our assumptions, estimates, and judgments are based on historical experience, current trends, and other factors we believe are relevant at the time we prepare our consolidated financial statements.

Our significant accounting policies and critical accounting estimates are consistent with those discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements and the MD&A section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014.~~2015. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there were no significant changes in our application of our critical accounting ~~policies.~~policies except for the addition of Inventories specifically related to the valuation on our used truck inventory as described below.

To aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reporting results, we have identified the following accounting policies as our most critical because they require us to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments:

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Income Taxes

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

~~Goodwill~~

~~Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets~~

Contingency Accruals

Inventories

Inventories. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Our gross used truck inventory increased to approximately $440 million at January 31, 2016 from $390 million at October 31, 2015, offset by reserves of $145 million and $110 million, respectively. The increase in used truck inventory is due, in part, to used truck receipts as a result of trades, repossessions and end of operating lease cycles exceeding used truck sales. As a result of these market dynamics, we expect it may take several years before our used truck inventory returns to the lower targeted levels. We continue to seek alternative channels to sell our used trucks, including certain export markets which have resulted in a lower price point as compared to our domestic channels.

In valuing our used truck inventory, we are required to make assumptions regarding the level of reserves required to value inventories at their net realizable value ("NRV"). Our judgments and estimates for used truck inventory are based on an analysis of current and forecasted sales prices, aging of and demand for used trucks, and the mix of sales through various market channels. The estimated NRV is subject to change based on numerous conditions taking into account age, specifications, mileage, timing of sales, market mix and current and forecasted pricing. While calculations are made involving these factors, significant management judgment regarding expectations for future events is involved. Future events that could significantly influence our judgment and related estimates include general economic conditions in markets where our products are sold, actions of our competitors, and the ability to sell used trucks in a timely manner.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards

In the quarter ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015, the Company did~~2016, we have not ~~adopt~~adopted any new accounting guidance that has had a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, ~~Revenue~~"Revenue from Contracts with ~~Customers~~Customers" (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, ~~Revenue~~"Revenue Recognition." This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ~~On July 9,~~In August 2015, the FASB ~~deferred~~issued ASU No. 2015-14, which postponed the effective date of ~~this update~~ASU No. 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted on the original effective date of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Our effective date for this ASU is November 1, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements and method of adoption.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

See Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2014.~~2015. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there have been no material changes in our exposure to market risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As previously disclosed under ~~“Item~~“Item 9A-Controls and ~~Procedures”~~Procedures” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of October 31, ~~2014 based~~2015 due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Based on the material weakness, ~~identified.~~ which we continue to work to remediate and view as an integral part of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the quarter ended January 31, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. In light of the weakness in internal control over financial reporting, prior to filing our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, and prior to filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2016, we completed substantive procedures that allowed us to conclude that the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

The material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which is described more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2014, was~~2015, and continued to exist as of January 31, 2016, is as follows:

We did not have sufficient controls designed to validate the ~~completeness~~proper classification of warranty claims data, including type of warranty coverage and ~~accuracy of underlying data used in the determination of significant estimates and accounting transactions. Specifically, controls were not designed to identify errors in the underlying data~~product/component, which ~~was~~is used to ~~calculate~~determine the warranty ~~cost estimates~~accrual and ~~other significant accounting estimates and the accounting effects of significant transactions.~~expense. This material weakness resulted in ~~the recording of adjustments~~misstatements in our warranty accrual that were corrected prior to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015. The classification errors and resulting warranty ~~reserve and related expense accounts and there was~~accrual misstatements did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements, including our warranty cash outlays for claims. However, a reasonable possibility exists that a material ~~misstatement of~~misstatements in our consolidated financial statements ~~would~~will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management has worked throughout the year to remediate the material weakness that existed as of October 31, 2014. In the third quarter ended July 31, 2015, management had sufficient evidence to conclude that remediation was complete for the material weakness previously reported. The significant changes in internal control over financial reporting that resulted in the remediation of the material weakness are described below.

6454

In connection with the preparation of this Report, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of July 31, 2015. Based on the evaluation, management has concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July 31, 2015.

Management’s Remediation Initiatives

~~During 2014 and 2015, we invested~~We continue to invest significant time and effort to ~~remediate~~address the material weakness related to validation and proper classification of warranty claims data used to determine the ~~completeness~~warranty accrual and ~~accuracy~~expense. Remediation generally requires making changes to how controls are designed and then adhering to those changes for a sufficient period of time such that the effectiveness of those changes is demonstrated with an appropriate amount of consistency. We have assigned owners, who are responsible for implementing and monitoring our short-term and long-term remediation plans, as well as executive owners to oversee the necessary remedial changes to the overall design of our internal control environment and to address the root causes of the ~~underlying data used in~~material weakness.

To remediate the ~~determination of significant estimates~~material weakness and ~~the accounting effects of significant transactions. Specifically, the following remediation actions were taken:~~

~~Critical management review~~to continue to enhance our internal control over financial reporting, we are designing, documenting, and testing controls ~~were enhanced to increase the precision of management's reviews and these reviews were expanded~~that are intended to validate ~~the completeness~~proper classification of warranty claims data. System enhancements are underway to help automate claim validation and ~~accuracy of the reports and data used in the operation of the controls.~~

~~Controls were designed and implemented to validate the completeness and accuracy of the inputs and outputs for significant accounting estimates and transactions.~~

~~Stronger system interface controls were implemented to verify the complete and accurate flow of data between systems used for the significant accounting estimates and transactions.~~

~~We invested in human capital and information technology improvements to accomplish the control improvements mentioned above.~~

~~Management continues to monitor the processes and controls to ensure sustainment of the improvements made to our control environment.~~

classification.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We are taking actions to remediate the material weakness related to our internal controls over financial reporting, as described above. However, our remediation efforts were not complete as of January 31, 2016. Other than the changes disclosed above, there were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015~~2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

6555

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there have been no material developments from the legal proceedings disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended October 31, 2014, except (i) those disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2015; (ii) those disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2015; and (iii) those disclosed below:

~~Shareholder Litigation~~

~~On July 10, 2015, the Court issued its Opinion and Order on our Motion to Dismiss the Defendants’ Second Amended Complaint in the 10b-5 Cases (as defined under Note 11,~~ ~~Commitments and Contingencies~~, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, above). The Motion to Dismiss was granted in part and denied in part. Specifically, the Court (i) dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims against the Company, Andrew J. Cederoth and Jack Allen and (ii) dismissed all of plaintiffs’ claims against Daniel C. Ustian, the only remaining defendant, except for claims regarding two of Mr. Ustian’s statements. Further, all of the dismissed claims were dismissed with prejudice except for claims based on statements made subsequent to the lead plaintiff’s last purchase of the Company’s stock (the “Post-Purchase Claims”). The Court determined the lead plaintiff lacked standing to assert the Post-Purchase Claims and dismissed those claims without prejudice.

In July 2015, the existing stay order in the derivative action filed by James Gould in March 2013 was further extended through November 23, 2015. Also in July 2015, the existing stay order in the derivative action filed by Abbie Griffin in August 2013 was further extended through December 3, 2015.

~~EPA Clean Air Act Litigation~~

On July 14, 2015, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed a lawsuit against the Company and Navistar, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that during 2010 the Company introduced into commerce approximately 7,750 heavy-duty diesel engines that did not meet the EPA’s emissions standards applicable to 2010 engines, resulting in violations of the federal Clean Air Act. On July 16, 2015, the DOJ filed an Amended Complaint clarifying the amount of civil penalties being sought. The lawsuit requests injunctive relief and the assessment of civil penalties of up to $37,500 for each violation. The Company disputes the allegations in the lawsuit.

~~CARB Notice of Violation~~

In May 2015, Navistar, Inc. and the California Air Resources Board finalized a settlement resolving the matter for a penalty payment of $0.3 million and the Company's agreement to conduct certain in-use testing.

~~Item 1A.Risk Factors~~


Item 1A.	Risk Factors

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015,~~2016, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our year ended October 31, ~~2014, except those disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30,~~ 2015.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities

None.


Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.


Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


Item 5.	Other Information

None.

6756

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit:	Description	Page
(10)	Material Contracts	E-1
(31.1)	CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-2
(31.2)	CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-3
(32.1)	CEO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-4
(32.2)	CFO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	E-5
(99.1)	Additional Financial Information (Unaudited)	E-6
(101.INS)	XBRL Instance Document	N/A
(101.SCH)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	N/A
(101.CAL)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	N/A
(101.LAB)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	N/A
(101.PRE)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	N/A
(101.DEF)	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	N/A

All exhibits other than those indicated above are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the information called for is shown in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended ~~July~~January 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

6857

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
	(Registrant)
	/s/ SAMARA A. STRYCKER
	Samara A. Strycker
	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller
	(Principal Accounting Officer)

~~September 2, 2015~~March 8, 2016

6958



(in millions)	Balance at October 31, 2014		Additions		Payments			Adjustments			Balance at July 31, 2015
Employee termination charges	$	8	$	17	$	(7	)	$	(2	)	$	16
Lease vacancy	11		—		(6		)	—			5
Other	1		2		(2		)	—			1
Restructuring liability	$	20	$	19	$	(15	)	$	(2	)	$	22



(in millions)	Balance at October 31, 2013		Additions		Payments			Adjustments			Balance at July 31, 2014
Employee termination charges	$	15	$	12	$	(12	)	$	(2	)	$	13
Employee relocation costs	—		1		(1		)	—			—
Lease vacancy	18		1		(6		)	—			13
Other	1		—		(2		)	—			(1		)
Restructuring liability	$	34	$	14	$	(21	)	$	(2	)	$	25

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)