UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

___________________________

FORM 10-Q

___________________________

(MARK ONE)


☒			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022


☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 1-14977

___________________________

Sanderson Farms, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

___________________________


Mississippi			64-0615843
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

127 Flynt Road, Laurel, Mississippi 39443

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(601) 649-4030

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $1 par value per share	SAFM	NASDAQ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

☒

Accelerated filer

☐

Non-accelerated filer

☐

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☐ No ☐

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Common Stock, $1 Par Value Per Share: ~~22,330,394~~22,323,097 shares outstanding as of February ~~23, 2021.~~22, 2022.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Condensed consolidated balance sheets—January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and October 31, ~~2020~~2021	3
	Condensed consolidated statements of operations—Three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021	4
	Condensed consolidated statements of stockholders' equity—Three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021	5
	Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows—Three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021	6
	Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements—January 31, ~~2021~~2022	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1917
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3026
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3127
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		3127
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3127
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3127
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3228
Item 6.	Exhibits	3330
INDEX TO EXHIBITS		3431
SIGNATURES		3532

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except number of shares)


		January 31, 2021		October 31, 2020			January 31, 2022		October 31, 2021
		(Unaudited)		(Note 1)			(Unaudited)		(Note 1)
Assets	Assets					Assets
Current assets:	Current assets:					Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	50,090	$	49,061	Cash and cash equivalents	$	685,823	$	439,339
Accounts receivable, net	Accounts receivable, net	167,711		147,546		Accounts receivable, net	224,082		223,865

Receivable from insurance companies						Receivable from insurance companies	—		2,057
Inventories	Inventories	325,672		290,007		Inventories	367,454		350,959
Refundable income taxes	Refundable income taxes	31,901		33,977		Refundable income taxes	—		7,418
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	61,735		57,544		Prepaid expenses and other current assets	69,807		62,632
Total current assets	Total current assets	637,109		578,135		Total current assets	1,347,166		1,086,270
Property, plant and equipment, net	Property, plant and equipment, net	1,223,169		1,224,746		Property, plant and equipment, net	1,207,512		1,224,334
Right of use assets	Right of use assets	36,894		40,785		Right of use assets	24,112		28,238
Other assets	Other assets	5,092		5,365		Other assets	5,927		6,191
Total assets	Total assets	$	1,902,264	$	1,849,031	Total assets	$	2,584,717	$	2,345,033
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity	Liabilities and stockholders’ equity					Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:	Current liabilities:					Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	$	131,332	$	111,463	Accounts payable	$	206,895	$	152,421
Dividends payable	Dividends payable	9,823		0		Dividends payable	9,823		—
Accrued expenses	Accrued expenses	94,277		98,663		Accrued expenses	80,566		144,453
Lease liabilities	Lease liabilities	14,253		13,981		Lease liabilities	10,707		12,189

Accrued income taxes						Accrued income taxes	50,946		—

Total current liabilities	Total current liabilities	249,685		224,107		Total current liabilities	358,937		309,063
Long-term debt		55,000		25,000

Claims payable and other liabilities	Claims payable and other liabilities	12,615		12,175		Claims payable and other liabilities	13,005		13,078
Deferred income taxes	Deferred income taxes	142,841		141,672		Deferred income taxes	160,465		156,531
Long-term lease liabilities	Long-term lease liabilities	22,641		26,804		Long-term lease liabilities	13,477		16,122
Commitments and contingencies	Commitments and contingencies	0		0		Commitments and contingencies	0		0
Stockholders’ equity:	Stockholders’ equity:					Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock:	Preferred Stock:					Preferred Stock:
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $100 par value: authorized 500,000 shares, NaN issued		0		0
Par value to be determined by the Board of Directors: authorized 4,500,000 shares; NaN issued		0		0
Common Stock, $1 par value: authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding shares—22,325,635 and 22,251,071 at January 31, 2021 and October 31, 2020, respectively		22,326		22,251
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $100 par value: authorized 500,000 shares, none issued						Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $100 par value: authorized 500,000 shares, none issued	0		0
Par value to be determined by the Board of Directors: authorized 4,500,000 shares; none issued						Par value to be determined by the Board of Directors: authorized 4,500,000 shares; none issued	0		0
Common Stock, $1 par value: authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding shares—22,324,066 and 22,329,731 at January 31, 2022 and October 31, 2021, respectively						Common Stock, $1 par value: authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding shares—22,324,066 and 22,329,731 at January 31, 2022 and October 31, 2021, respectively	22,324		22,330
Paid-in capital	Paid-in capital	90,900		90,420		Paid-in capital	111,133		105,517
Retained earnings	Retained earnings	1,306,256		1,306,602		Retained earnings	1,905,376		1,722,392
Total stockholders’ equity	Total stockholders’ equity	1,419,482		1,419,273		Total stockholders’ equity	2,038,833		1,850,239
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,902,264	$	1,849,031	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,584,717	$	2,345,033

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Three Months Ended
January 31,
2021 2020
Net sales $ 909,306 $ 823,078
Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales 839,322 823,524
Selling, general and administrative 56,599 49,485
895,921 873,009
Operating income (loss) 13,385 (49,931)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense (638) (1,188)
Other 3 2
(635) (1,186)
Income (loss) before income taxes 12,750 (51,117)
Income tax expense (benefit) 3,272 (12,541)
Net income (loss) $ 9,478 $ (38,576)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.42 $ (1.76)
Diluted $ 0.42 $ (1.76)
Dividends per share $ 0.44 $ 0.32


	Three Months Ended January 31,
	2022		2021
Net sales	$	1,327,428	$	909,306
Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales	1,008,054		839,322

Selling, general and administrative	65,738		56,599
	1,073,792		895,921
Operating income	253,636		13,385
Other income (expense):
Interest income	97		—
Interest expense	(577)		(638)
Other	3		3
	(477)		(635)
Income before income taxes	253,159		12,750
Income tax expense	60,352		3,272
Net income	$	192,807	$	9,478
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	8.64	$	0.42
Diluted	$	8.64	$	0.42
Dividends per share	$	0.44	$	0.44

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

Fiscal Year 2020 Common Stock Paid-In
Capital Retained
Earnings Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Shares Amount
Balance at October 31, 2019 22,203,920 $ 22,204 $ 86,010 $ 1,309,461 $ 1,417,675
Net loss - first quarter 2020 — — — (38,576) (38,576)
Cash dividends ($0.32 per share) — — — (7,113) (7,113)
Stock compensation plan transactions 25,292 25 (4,721) — (4,696)
Amortization of unearned compensation — — 2,082 — 2,082
Balance at January 31, 2020 22,229,212 $ 22,229 $ 83,371 $ 1,263,772 $ 1,369,372


Fiscal Year 2021	Common Stock			Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance at October 31, 2020	22,251,071	$	22,251	$	90,420	$	1,306,602	$	1,419,273
Net income - first quarter 2021	—	—		—		9,478		9,478
Cash dividends ($0.44 per share)	—	—		—		(9,824)		(9,824)
Stock compensation plan transactions	74,564	75		(1,667)		—		(1,592)
Amortization of unearned compensation	—	—		2,147		—		2,147
Balance at January 31, 2021	22,325,635	$	22,326	$	90,900	$	1,306,256	$	1,419,482


Fiscal Year 2021		Common Stock			Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings				Total Stockholders’ Equity
		Shares	Amount
Balance at October 31, 2020		22,251,071	$	22,251			$	90,420			$	1,306,602					$	1,419,273
Net income - first quarter 2021		—	—		—				9,478				9,478
Fiscal Year 2022															Fiscal Year 2022	Common Stock					Paid-In Capital				Retained Earnings				Total Stockholders’ Equity
																Shares			Amount
Balance at October 31, 2021															Balance at October 31, 2021	22,329,731			$	22,330			$	105,517			$	1,722,392			$	1,850,239
Net income - first quarter 2022															Net income - first quarter 2022	—			—		—				192,807				192,807
Cash dividends ($0.44 per share)	Cash dividends ($0.44 per share)	—	—		—				(9,824)				(9,824)		Cash dividends ($0.44 per share)	—			—		—				(9,823)				(9,823)
Stock compensation plan transactions	Stock compensation plan transactions	74,564	75		(1,667)				—				(1,592)		Stock compensation plan transactions	(5,665)			(6)		(2,267)				—				(2,273)
Amortization of unearned compensation	Amortization of unearned compensation	—	—		2,147				—				2,147		Amortization of unearned compensation	—			—		7,883				—				7,883
Balance at January 31, 2021		22,325,635	$	22,326	$	90,900			$	1,306,256			$	1,419,482
Balance at January 31, 2022															Balance at January 31, 2022	22,324,066			$	22,324	$	111,133			$	1,905,376			$	2,038,833

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(In thousands)


		Three Months Ended January 31,					Three Months Ended January 31,
		2021		2020			2022		2021
Operating activities	Operating activities					Operating activities
Net income (loss)		$	9,478	$	(38,576)
Net income						Net income	$	192,807	$	9,478
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:					Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	Depreciation and amortization	40,566		36,697		Depreciation and amortization	43,523		40,566
Amortization of share-based compensation	Amortization of share-based compensation	2,671		2,747		Amortization of share-based compensation	8,406		2,671
Live inventory adjustment (net of prior period reversal)		0		(2,800)

Deferred income taxes	Deferred income taxes	1,169		5,169		Deferred income taxes	3,934		1,169
(Gain) loss on asset disposals		(48)		15
Gain on asset disposals						Gain on asset disposals	(119)		(48)
Change in assets and liabilities:	Change in assets and liabilities:					Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - trade	Accounts receivable - trade	(20,165)		(7,289)		Accounts receivable - trade	(217)		(20,165)
Accounts receivable - insurance	Accounts receivable - insurance	0		445		Accounts receivable - insurance	2,057		—
Income taxes	Income taxes	2,076		(15,888)		Income taxes	58,364		2,076
Inventories	Inventories	(35,665)		(2,228)		Inventories	(16,495)		(35,665)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	Prepaid expenses and other assets	(4,191)		(10,181)		Prepaid expenses and other assets	(7,164)		(4,191)
Right of use assets	Right of use assets	3,891		4,856		Right of use assets	4,126		3,891
Lease liabilities	Lease liabilities	(3,891)		(4,856)		Lease liabilities	(4,126)		(3,891)
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	17,995		(17,225)		Accounts payable	55,865		17,995
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(4,455)		(16,747)		Accrued expenses and other liabilities	(64,459)		(4,455)
Total adjustments	Total adjustments	(47)		(27,285)		Total adjustments	83,695		(47)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		9,431		(65,861)
Net cash provided by operating activities						Net cash provided by operating activities	276,502		9,431
Investing activities	Investing activities					Investing activities
Capital expenditures	Capital expenditures	(36,859)		(71,245)		Capital expenditures	(27,876)		(36,859)
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment	Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment	65		65		Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment	156		65
Net cash used in investing activities	Net cash used in investing activities	(36,794)		(71,180)		Net cash used in investing activities	(27,720)		(36,794)
Financing activities	Financing activities					Financing activities

Borrowings from revolving line of credit	Borrowings from revolving line of credit	30,000		110,000		Borrowings from revolving line of credit	—		30,000

Proceeds from issuance of restricted stock under stock compensation plans	Proceeds from issuance of restricted stock under stock compensation plans	265		268		Proceeds from issuance of restricted stock under stock compensation plans	656		265
Payments from issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans	Payments from issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans	(1,873)		(5,228)		Payments from issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans	(2,954)		(1,873)

Net cash provided by financing activities		28,392		105,040
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities						Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(2,298)		28,392
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	Net change in cash and cash equivalents	1,029		(32,001)		Net change in cash and cash equivalents	246,484		1,029
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	49,061		95,417		Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	439,339		49,061
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	50,090	$	63,416	Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	685,823	$	50,090
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:	Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:					Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable	Capital expenditures included in accounts payable	$	5,405	$	7,026	Capital expenditures included in accounts payable	$	3,740	$	5,405
Dividends payable	Dividends payable	$	9,823	$	7,113	Dividends payable	$	9,823	$	9,823

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

January 31, ~~2021~~2022

NOTE 1—ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet at October 31, ~~2020~~2021 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

New Accounting Pronouncements

~~In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, to~~ provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. ~~We adopted ASU 2016-13 during our first quarter of fiscal 2021, and adoption did not~~ have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. Under the new standard, we are required to record on our balance sheet an allowance for expected credit losses, which is estimated utilizing historical experience and current and expected economic conditions. Our allowance for expected credit losses is recorded on the accounts receivable, net line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and is immaterial to our financial position.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Accounting Standards Codification 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2020, our fiscal 2022. We ~~are currently evaluating~~adopted this guidance during the ~~impact~~first quarter of ~~this new guidance on~~fiscal 2022, and adoption did not materially affect our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting, which provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying U.S. GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. This guidance, which became effective on March 12, 2020, and can be applied through December 31, 2022, has not affected our consolidated financial statements. We have a revolving credit facility that references LIBOR, and we are assessing how this standard may be applied to specific contract modifications through December 31, 2022.

NOTE 2—REVENUE

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in connection with a contract in which the Company has agreed to sell, and a customer has agreed to purchase, specific quantities of product at agreed-upon prices and when the Company's performance obligation related to that contract has been satisfied. In the majority of its contracts with customers, the Company's performance obligation is satisfied when delivery of the product has occurred, either at the customer's facility or the Company's facility, depending on the terms of each contract. In a smaller number of contracts, ownership of the product passes from the Company to the customer at some point during transit, at which time the performance obligation is satisfied and revenue is recognized. Revenue and related receivables are recognized based on the transaction price within the contract and are reduced by estimated or known amounts for items such as rebates, discounts, cooperative advertising allowances and other various items.

~~Table of Contents~~

The cost incurred for shipping and handling activities to deliver the product to the customer is recognized in cost of sales during the period in which the corresponding revenue is recognized. Where shipping and handling activities occur after the customer has obtained control of the product, the Company has elected to account for those expenses as fulfillment costs in cost of sales, rather than an additional promised service. Revenue is reported gross of any freight charge that is separately invoiced to a customer, and all freight costs are accounted for as cost of sales.

Due to the nature of our contracts, commissions associated with such contracts provide only a short-term benefit (i.e. less than one year); therefore, we recognize costs of commissions paid to third-party brokers as selling, general and administrative expenses.

Table of Contents

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following ~~tables disaggregate~~table disaggregates our net sales by product category:


Product Category	Product Category	Three Months Ended January 31, 2021		Three Months Ended January 31, 2020		Product Category	Three Months Ended January 31, 2022		Three Months Ended January 31, 2021
		(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Fresh, vacuum-sealed chicken						Fresh, vacuum-sealed chicken	$	519,631	$	294,118
Fresh, chill-packed chicken	Fresh, chill-packed chicken	$	376,252	$	287,267	Fresh, chill-packed chicken	427,191		376,252
Fresh, vacuum-sealed chicken		294,118		311,296
Fresh, ice-packed chicken	Fresh, ice-packed chicken	131,681		120,463		Fresh, ice-packed chicken	229,125		131,681
Frozen chicken	Frozen chicken	63,403		46,674		Frozen chicken	80,624		63,403
Prepared chicken	Prepared chicken	38,915		51,382		Prepared chicken	64,256		38,915
Other	Other	4,937		5,996		Other	6,601		4,937
Total net sales	Total net sales	$	909,306	$	823,078	Total net sales	$	1,327,428	$	909,306

NOTE 3—INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:


Inventory type	Inventory type	January 31, 2021		October 31, 2020		Inventory type	January 31, 2022		October 31, 2021
		(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Live poultry-broilers and breeders	Live poultry-broilers and breeders	$	209,008	$	180,013	Live poultry-broilers and breeders	$	236,713	$	229,245
Feed, eggs and other	Feed, eggs and other	63,862		53,318		Feed, eggs and other	62,813		57,994
Processed poultry	Processed poultry	30,596		32,952		Processed poultry	42,911		42,775
Prepared chicken	Prepared chicken	13,452		16,142		Prepared chicken	14,252		11,157
Packaging materials	Packaging materials	8,754		7,582		Packaging materials	10,765		9,788
Total Inventories	Total Inventories	$	325,672	$	290,007	Total Inventories	$	367,454	$	350,959

NOTE 4—PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment, net, consisted of the following:


Description	Description	January 31, 2021		October 31, 2020		Description	January 31, 2022		October 31, 2021
		(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Land and buildings	Land and buildings	$	936,590	$	931,674	Land and buildings	$	978,853	$	976,012
Machinery and equipment	Machinery and equipment	1,357,018		1,350,725		Machinery and equipment	1,467,741		1,439,762
Work-in-process	Work-in-process	43,449		16,914		Work-in-process	13,791		19,924
		2,337,057		2,299,313			2,460,385		2,435,698
Less accumulated depreciation	Less accumulated depreciation	(1,113,888)		(1,074,567)		Less accumulated depreciation	(1,252,873)		(1,211,364)
Property, plant and equipment, net	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	1,223,169	$	1,224,746	Property, plant and equipment, net	$	1,207,512	$	1,224,334

NOTE 5—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

~~Table of Contents~~

Refer to Note 10 and Note 11 of the Company’s October 31, ~~2020~~2021 audited financial statements in the Company's ~~2020~~2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our employee benefit plans and stock based compensation plans, respectively. Total stock based compensation expense during the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 was ~~$2.7~~$8.4 million, as compared to total stock based compensation expense of $2.7 million for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

During the three months ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, participants in the Company’s Management Share Purchase Plan ("MSPP") elected to receive a total of ~~2,004~~3,443 shares of restricted stock at an average price of ~~$132.20~~$190.64 per share instead of a specified percentage of their cash compensation, and the Company issued ~~479~~824 matching restricted shares. During the three months ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company recorded compensation expense for the MSPP shares, included in the total stock based compensation expense above, of ~~$75,000,~~$58,000, as compared to ~~$56,000~~$75,000 during the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Walnut Sycamore Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), Sycamore Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and solely for purposes of certain provisions specified therein, Wayne Farms LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Merger Agreement”), no new cash compensation reduction elections under the MSPP may be made after August 8, 2021, and no participants may increase their cash compensation reduction elections under the MSPP after August 8, 2021.

During fiscal ~~2021,~~ 2020 and ~~2019,~~2021, the Company entered into performance share agreements that grant certain officers and key employees the right to receive shares of the Company's common stock, subject to the Company's achievement of certain performance measures. The performance share agreements specify a target number of shares that a participant can receive based upon the Company's average return on equity and average return on sales, as defined, during a two-year performance period beginning November 1 of each performance period. Although the performance share agreements have a two-year performance period, there is an additional one-year period during which the participant must remain employed by the Company before the shares are paid out. If the Company's average return on equity and average return on sales meet or exceed certain threshold amounts for the performance period, participants will receive 50 percent to 200 percent of the target number of shares, depending upon the Company's level of performance. Accruals for performance shares begin during the period management determines that achievement of the applicable performance based criteria is probable at some level. In estimating the probability of the number of shares that will be awarded, the Company considers, among other factors, current and projected grain costs and chicken volumes and pricing, as well as the amount of the Company's commitments to procure grain at a fixed price throughout the performance period. Due to the high level of volatility of these commodity prices and the impact that the change in pricing can have on the Company's results, the Company's assessment of probability can change from period to period and can result in a significant revision to the amounts accrued related to the arrangements, as the accruals are adjusted using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting.

The target number of shares specified in the performance share agreements executed on November 1, 2020 totaled 87,350. AsDuring the first quarter of ~~January 31, 2021,~~fiscal 2022, the Company ~~could not determine~~determined that achievement of the applicable performance based criteria for the November 1, 2020 agreements is probable ~~due~~at a level between threshold and target for the return on equity criteria and at a level between target and maximum for the return on sales criteria. Accordingly, the quarter ended January 31, 2022 includes compensation expense of $5,137,000, included in the total stock based compensation expense above, related to ~~operating results~~the agreements executed on November 1, 2020, as compared to ~~date and the uncertainties discussed above, and therefore recorded 0~~no compensation expense related to those ~~agreements.~~same agreements recorded during the quarter ended January 31, 2021. As of January 31, 2022, the aggregate number of shares estimated to be awarded related to the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2020 totaled 88,924 shares. The actual number of shares that can be awarded for those agreements could change materially from that estimate due to the Company's actual performance during the remaining nine months of the performance period ending October 31, 2022, and due to potential forfeitures. The Company will recognize the remaining unearned compensation related to these agreements over the remaining service period, which ends on October 31, 2023. Had the Company determined that it was probable that the maximum amount of those outstanding awards from the agreements entered into on November 1, 2020 would be earned, an additional $3.5 million of compensation expense would have been accrued as of January 31, 2022.

The Company also has performance share agreements in place with certain officers and key employees that were entered into on November 1, 2019. The target number of shares specified in those agreements totaled 56,575. ~~As of~~The Company has determined that shares covered by these agreements have been earned at a level between the threshold and target for the portion dependent upon return on equity criteria and at a level between target and maximum for the portion dependent upon return on sales criteria. Accordingly, the quarter ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022 includes compensation expense of $881,000 related to those agreements, included in the ~~Company could not determine that achievement of the applicable performance~~total stock based ~~criteria is probable due~~compensation expense above, as compared to ~~operating results to date and the uncertainties discussed above, and therefore recorded 0~~no compensation expense related to those ~~agreements.~~

~~The performance period has lapsed for~~agreements recorded during the performance share agreements that were entered into on November 1, 2018, and the Company's average return on equity and average return on sales did not meet the threshold amounts defined by those agreements. As a result, 0quarter ended January 31, 2021. There was no compensation expense ~~has been~~ recorded during the first quarter of fiscal 2021 related to ~~those agreements.~~

~~Had~~these agreements, because the Company first determined ~~that~~ it was probable that some portion of these shares would be earned during the ~~maximum amount~~third quarter of ~~those outstanding awards from~~fiscal 2021. As of January 31, 2022, the aggregate number of shares estimated to be awarded related to the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2019 ~~and~~totaled 60,682 shares. Since the performance period for these agreements has ended, the actual number of shares that will be awarded can change only due to potential forfeitures during the remaining nine months of the service period ending October 31, 2022. The Company will recognize the remaining unearned compensation related to these agreements over the remaining service period.

Typically, the Company would have also entered into performance share agreements dated November 1, ~~2020 would be earned, an additional $7.5 million~~2021, with its officers and ~~$1.9 million of compensation expense, respectively, would have been accrued as of January 31, 2021.~~key employees, but covenants in the Merger Agreement prohibited the Company from doing so.

The Company's compensation expense related to performance share agreements is summarized as follows (in thousands, except number of shares):

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended
Date of Performance Share Agreement Number of shares issued (actual (a) or estimated (e)) January 31, 2021 January 31, 2020
November 1, 2017 13,055 (a) $ 0 $ 190
November 1, 2018 0 (a) 0 0
November 1, 2019 (1) 0 (e) 0 0
November 1, 2020 (1) 0 (e) 0 0
Total performance share compensation expense $ 0 $ 190


		Three Months Ended
Date of Performance Share Agreement	Number of shares issued (actual (a) or estimated (e))	January 31, 2022		January 31, 2021
November 1, 2019	60,682 (e)	881		—
November 1, 2020	88,924 (e)	5,137		—
Total performance share compensation expense		$	6,018	$	—

Note (1) - As of January 31, 2021, the Company could not determine that achievement of the applicable performance-based criteria is probable for the agreements entered into on November 1, 2019 and November 1, 2020, due to the uncertainties discussed above, and therefore recorded no compensation expense related to those agreements.

On November 1, 2020, the Company granted 87,350 shares of restricted stock to certain officers and key management employees. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of $127.97 per share and will vest on November 1, 2024. On February 18, 2021, the Company granted an aggregate of 9,760 shares of restricted stock to all of its non-employee directors. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of $153.65 per share and vests ~~one~~, ~~two~~ ~~or three years from the date of grant.~~ The Company ~~also~~ has unvested restricted stock grants outstanding that were granted during prior fiscal years to its officers, key employees and outside directors. The aggregate number of shares outstanding at January 31, ~~2021~~2022 related to all unvested restricted stock grants totaled ~~286,178.~~223,767. During the three months ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company recorded compensation expense, included in the total stock based compensation expense above, of ~~$2.6~~$2.3 million related to restricted stock grants, as compared to ~~$2.5~~$2.6 million during the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The Company had ~~$21.9~~$13.2 million in unrecognized share-based compensation expense as of January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, which will be recognized over a weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately ~~2 years,~~ 1 ~~month.~~year, 8 months. Typically, the Company would have made new restricted stock grants to its officers and key employees effective on November 1, 2021, but covenants in the Merger Agreement prohibited the Company from doing so.

NOTE 6—EARNINGS PER SHARE

Certain share-based payment awards described in Note 5 - Stock Compensation Plans above entitling holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends before vesting are considered participating securities and thus are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share, to the extent they are dilutive. These awards are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates earnings for the period between common shareholders and other security holders. The participating awards receiving dividends are allocated the same amount of income as if they were vested shares.

The following ~~tables present~~table presents earnings per share:

Three Months Ended
January 31, 2021 January 31, 2020
(in thousands except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) $ 9,478 $ (38,576)
Distributed and undistributed (earnings) to unvested restricted stock (133) 0
Distributed and undistributed earnings (loss) to common shareholders—Basic $ 9,345 $ (38,576)
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic 22,010 21,935
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted 22,010 21,935
Earnings (loss) per common share—Basic $ 0.42 $ (1.76)
Earnings (loss) per common share—Diluted $ 0.42 $ (1.76)


	Three Months Ended
	January 31, 2022		January 31, 2021
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income	$	192,807	$	9,478
Distributed and undistributed (earnings) to unvested restricted stock	$	(2,186)	$	(133)
Distributed and undistributed earnings to common shareholders—Basic	$	190,621	$	9,345
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic	22,069		22,010
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted	22,069		22,010
Earnings per common share—Basic	$	8.64	$	0.42
Earnings per common share—Diluted	$	8.64	$	0.42

NOTE 7—~~FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS~~

The Company holds certain items that are required to be disclosed at fair value, primarily debt instruments. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy is followed for disclosure to show the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value measurements:

~~Level 1 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Level 2 – Inputs used to measure fair value, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, and were categorized as Level 2 measurements. As of January 31, 2021 and October 31, 2020, the fair values of the Company's borrowings under its revolving credit facility approximate the carrying values.

~~NOTE 8—~~COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~Property, Plant and Equipment~~

In October 2019, the Company announced plans to construct a new hatchery in Jones County, Mississippi. Upon completion of the project, the Company will relocate its existing hatchery operations from its current, nearby hatchery facility located in Laurel, Mississippi. Construction commenced during the first quarter of fiscal 2020, and initial operations are expected to begin during the second quarter of fiscal 2021. The Company estimates the total cost of the construction project will be approximately $19.5 million, of which $9.4 million was spent during fiscal 2020 and $10.1 million is budgeted for fiscal 2021. As of January 31, 2021, the Company has spent a total of approximately $14.3 million on the project, including $4.9 million during the first three months of fiscal 2021. We expect to spend the remaining budgeted amounts during the second and third quarters of fiscal 2021.

Litigation

In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation

Between September 2, 2016 and October 13, 2016, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with 13 other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in multiple putative class action lawsuits filed by direct and indirect purchasers of broiler chickens in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints allege that the defendants conspired to unlawfully fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price of broiler chickens, thereby violating federal and certain states’ antitrust laws, and also allege certain related state-law claims. The complaints also allege that the defendants fraudulently concealed the alleged anticompetitive conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy. The complaints seek damages, including treble damages for the antitrust claims, injunctive relief, costs, and attorneys’ fees. As detailed below, the Court has consolidated all of the direct purchaser complaints into ~~one~~1 case, and the indirect purchaser complaints into ~~two~~2 cases, ~~one~~1 on behalf of commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs and ~~one~~1 on behalf of end-user consumer plaintiffs. The cases are part of a coordinated proceeding captioned In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation.

Table of Contents

On October 28, 2016, the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed consolidated, amended complaints, and on November 23, 2016, the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed second amended complaints. On December 16, 2016, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs separated into ~~two~~2 cases. On that date, the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint, and the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.

On January 27, 2017, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaints in all of the cases, and on November 20, 2017, the motions to dismiss were denied. On February 7, 2018, the direct purchaser plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint, adding ~~three~~3 additional poultry producers as defendants. On February 12, 2018, the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint, in which they also added ~~three~~3 additional poultry producers as defendants, along with Agri Stats, Inc. On February 20, 2018, the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed their fourth amended complaint. On November 13, 2018, the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed their fifth amended complaint, adding ~~three~~3 additional poultry producers as defendants. On November 28, 2018, the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint. On January 15, 2019, the direct purchaser plaintiffs filed their fourth amended complaint, and the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed their sixth amended complaint. Both the direct purchaser plaintiffs and the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs added ~~two~~2 new poultry producers as defendants, as

~~Table of Contents~~

well as Agri Stats, Inc. On August 6, 2020, the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a fifth amended complaint. The Court granted the end-user consumer plaintiffs’ motion on September 22, 2020 and deemed the version of the complaint filed on August 7, 2020 operative on October 19, 2020. On October 23, 2020, the direct purchaser plaintiffs filed their fifth amended complaint and the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed their seventh amended complaint.

Between December 8, 2017 and ~~February~~June 11, ~~2021,~~2020, additional purported direct-purchaser entities individually brought ~~sixty-six~~ separate suits against 20 poultry producers, including Sanderson Farms ~~as well as~~and Agri Stats, Inc. ~~and Rabobank in~~, which have been consolidated with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, and the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico.other cases. These suits allege substantially similar claims to the direct purchaser class complaint described above; certain of the suits additionally allege related state-law and common-law claims, and related claims under federal and Georgia RICO statutes. ~~Four~~NaN complaints filed on June 12, 2020 ~~another complaint amended on July 24, 2020, and ten additional direct action complaints~~ also plead allegations of federal bid rigging. Since that time, an additional NaN individual actions have been filed, some of which also plead allegations of federal bid rigging. On January 29, 2021, the individual-action plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. Those suits filed in the Northern District of Illinois are now pending in front of the same judge as the putative class action lawsuits. On June 26, 2018, the defendants filed a motion to transfer the case filed in the District of Kansas to the Northern District of Illinois, and that motion was granted on September 13, 2018. On June 7, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer the case filed in the Western District of Arkansas to the Northern District of Illinois, and that motion was granted on June 11, 2019. On July 24, 2019, one of the defendants filed a motion to transfer the case filed in the District of Puerto Rico to the Northern District of Illinois, and that motion was granted on July 25, 2019. On July 22, 2019, the Company moved to dismiss in part those direct-purchaser complaints that allege claims under federal and Georgia RICO statutes against it. The motion was fully briefed on September 20, 2019, and the Court heard argument on the motion on December 18, 2019. On March 3, 2020, the Court denied the Company's motion. On October 18, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss the case filed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico on its behalf and on behalf of its citizens. The motion was fully briefed on January 21, 2020. On July 15, 2020, the Court dismissed Puerto Rico's claims on behalf of its citizens. On July 2, 2020 and August 6, 2020, certain defendants, including the Company, moved to exclude bid rigging allegations and claims from the consolidated ~~In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation~~. Plaintiffs filed oppositions on August 6, 2020 and August 20, 2020. Defendants filed replies on August 20, 2020 and September 3, 2020. On September 22, 2020, the Court ordered that plaintiffs’ bid-rigging allegations are bifurcated and any discovery on such claims is stayed until plaintiffs’ supply reduction and Georgia Dock Index theories are resolved. On October 20, 2020, certain direct action plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaints. On October 23, 2020, the direct action plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint. Defendants filed an opposition to certain direct action plaintiffs’ motion to amend on November 4, 2020. Briefing was completed on November 16, 2020. The Court granted the motion to amend on January 6, 2021, and individual direct purchasers filed an amended consolidated complaint incorporating those allegations on January 29, 2021.

On October 30, 2020, direct purchaser plaintiffs, commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs, and end-user consumer plaintiffs filed motions for class certification. ~~Defendants filed their~~Defendants' oppositions to class certification onwere filed January 22, 2021. Class plaintiffs' replies in support of class certification ~~are due~~were filed March 29, 2021. Those motions remain pending.

On October 15, 2021, the Court ordered 2 different tracks of litigation with different timelines. The ~~parties are currently~~Court further clarified the 2 tracks at a December 20, 2021 hearing and in a December 20, 2021 order. One track is engaged in ~~discovery, subject~~merits expert discovery. Plaintiffs proceeding on the second track will file a consolidated amended complaint on February 28, 2022. Otherwise, the second track does not have an agreed-upon schedule to ~~the COVID-19-related delays discussed below.~~date. It is possible additional individual actions may be filed.

Since March 16, 2020, given the current COVID-19 public health emergency, the Northern District of Illinois issued three orders extending all deadlines in civil cases by 21 days, 28 days and 28 days, respectively, and seven orders that did not extend any deadlines, but explained other court procedures to protect the public health and welfare. These orders apply to the litigation described above. The Northern District of Illinois will vacate, amend or extend the Tenth Amended General Order on or before April 5, 2021.

Department of Justice Antitrust Investigation

The Company is aware that certain plaintiffs’ counsel in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation received from the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, a subpoena that included a request to produce all discovery in the case to a grand jury. On June 27, 2019, the Court in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation permitted the United States Department of Justice to intervene in the case, as well as ordered certain discovery stayed until September 27, 2019. Before the discovery stay expired on September 27, 2019, the United States Department of Justice asked the Court in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation to extend the discovery stay for an additional six months. On September 25, 2019, the Court granted the additional stay of not less than three months. On October 16, 2019, after further consideration, the Court extended the stay until June 27, 2020. On December 18, 2019, the Court after further consideration ordered that the stay be lifted on March 31, ~~2020.~~

~~Table~~2020, with the exception of ~~Contents~~certain discovery related to alleged bid-rigging claims brought by plaintiffs on the second track in

In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation.

The Company received a grand jury subpoena in connection with the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division investigation on September 9, 2019. The Company is complying with the subpoena and providing documents and information as requested by the Department of Justice in connection with its investigation.

State of New Mexico, ex rel. Hector Balderas v. Koch Foods Inc., et al.

Table of Contents

On September 1, 2020, the Attorney General of the State of New Mexico filed a lawsuit in New Mexico state court against Agri Stats, Inc. and producer defendants, including the Company. The lawsuit is substantially similar to those brought in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation. The case also brings claims under the New Mexico Antitrust Act and New Mexico Unfair Trade Practices Act, as well as a common law unjust enrichment claim. Defendants responded to the complaint on February 1, 2021. The parties are currently engaged in discovery.

State of Alaska v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al.

On February 19, 2021, the Attorney General of the State of Alaska filed a lawsuit in Alaska state court against Agri Stats, Inc. and producer defendants, including the Company. The lawsuit is substantially similar to those brought in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation. The case also brings claims under Alaska's antitrust statute and the Alaska Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, as well as a common law unjust enrichment claim. On May 12, 2021, certain defendants, including the Company, filed motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. On November 18, 2021, the Court heard arguments on the motions to dismiss, but deferred ruling on the motions pending jurisdictional discovery.

State of Washington v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al.

On August 6, 2020, the Company received a civil investigative demand ("CID") from the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington seeking information in connection with its investigation of possible violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act and/or the Sherman Act concerning contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce in the market for broiler chicken. The Company cooperated with the investigative demand and provided documents and information as requested by the Office of the Attorney General. On October 25, 2021, the Attorney General filed an action in Washington state court against Agri Stats, Inc. and producer defendants, including the Company. The lawsuit is substantially similar to those brought in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation. The complaint brings claims under the Washington Consumer Protection Act. Sanderson Farms was served with the complaint on November 1, 2021. The Company filed an answer denying the substance of the allegations on January 21, 2022. Discovery is ongoing.

We intend to ~~continue to~~ defend the In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation and relatedlawsuits vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail or the Department of Justice were to pursue charges, the Company could be liable for damages or other sanctions, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

In re Broiler Chicken Grower Litigation

On January 27, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with ~~four~~4 other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. On March 27, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with ~~four~~4 other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in a second putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The Court ordered the suits consolidated into ~~one~~1 proceeding, and on July 10, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. The consolidated amended complaint alleges that the defendants unlawfully conspired by sharing data on compensation paid to broiler farmers, with the purpose and effect of suppressing the farmers’ compensation below competitive levels. The consolidated amended complaint also alleges that the defendants unlawfully conspired to not solicit or hire the broiler farmers who were providing services to other defendants. The consolidated amended complaint seeks treble damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 8, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, on October 23, 2017, the plaintiffs filed their response, and on November 22, 2017, the defendants filed a reply. On January 19, 2018, the Court granted the Sanderson Farms defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.

On February 21, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a substantially similar lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina against Sanderson Farms and our subsidiaries and another poultry producer. The plaintiffs subsequently moved to consolidate this action with the Eastern District of Oklahoma action in the Eastern District of Oklahoma for pre-trial proceedings, with the defendants in support thereof. That motion was denied.

On July 13, 2018, the defendants moved to dismiss the lawsuit in the Eastern District of North Carolina, and briefing was completed on September 4, 2018. On January 15, 2019, the Court granted in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss and stayed the action in the Eastern District of North Carolina pending resolution of the action in the Eastern District of Oklahoma. On January 6, 2020, the Court in the Eastern District of Oklahoma denied defendants’ motion to dismiss. On January 27, 2020, plaintiffs in the Oklahoma case moved for leave to amend their complaint. The Court in the Eastern District of Oklahoma granted the plaintiffs' motion, and the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on February 21, 2020. The Oklahoma case is ongoing. On May 27, 2020, the

Table of Contents

Company moved to dismiss the action in the Eastern District of North Carolina under the first-to-file rule. Plaintiffs filed their opposition on June 17, 2020, and the Company filed its reply on July 1, 2020. ~~The motion is fully briefed and awaiting the Court's decision.~~

On September 11, 2020, additional named grower plaintiffs filed an identical putative class action in the District Court of Colorado against Sanderson Farms, Inc. and its Foods, Production, and Processing Divisions, as well as the other poultry producer defendants in the Oklahoma action. On October 14, 2020, Defendants moved to dismiss the case under the first-to-file doctrine because it is substantively identical to the earlier-filed cases pending in Oklahoma and North Carolina. Briefing on that motion was completed on December 16, 2020.

On September 18, 2020, another named grower plaintiff filed another duplicate class action in the District Court of Kansas against the same defendants as the Colorado action. On October 13, 2020, Defendants moved to dismiss the case under the first-to-file doctrine because it is substantively identical to the earlier-filed cases pending in Oklahoma, North Carolina, and Colorado. Briefing on that motion was completed on December 15, 2020.

~~Table of Contents~~

On October 8, 2020, new named grower plaintiffs filed another duplicate class action in the Northern District of California against the same defendants as the Colorado and Kansas actions. ~~The Company waived service of the Complaint on December 11, 2020.~~

On October 23, 2020, the District Court of Kansas stayed proceedings in that action (other than those related to the first-to-file motion) pending resolution of the first-to-file motion and the multi-district litigation ("MDL") consolidation motion discussed below. On November 12, 2020, the District Court of Colorado stayed proceeding in that action (other than those related to the first-to-file motion) pending resolution of the first-to-file motion and the MDL consolidation motion discussed below.

On October 6, 2020, Plaintiffs in the Oklahoma action moved to consolidate all of these duplicative cases into a MDL before the judge presiding over the Oklahoma case. Briefing on that motion was completed on November 6, 2020, and oral argument on the motion occurred on December 3, 2020. On December 15, 2020, the panel ordered that all actions be consolidated in the Eastern District of Oklahoma for pretrial proceedings. ~~On February 16, 2021,~~Given the panel's ruling on consolidation, the Company does not expect rulings on the first-to-file motions in the various actions described ~~above were denied without prejudice. Discovery~~above.

On February 19, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint in the ~~case~~MDL Court. The complaint is ~~underway.~~substantively identical to previous complaints. Fact discovery in the MDL is ongoing and is currently scheduled to end in August 2022.

We intend to defend these cases vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Antitrust Civil Investigative Demands

On February 21, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. received an antitrust ~~civil investigative demand~~CID from the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, of the State of Florida. Among other things, the demand seeks information related to the Georgia Dock Index and other information on poultry and poultry products published by the Georgia Department of Agriculture and its Poultry Market News division. The Company is cooperating fully with the investigative demand, and we have responded to all requests received to date; however, we are unable to predict its outcome at this time.

Separately, the Company ~~has become~~is also aware that certain plaintiffs’ counsel in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation received from the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, of the State of Florida, an antitrust ~~civil investigative demand~~CID that includes a request to produce all documents submitted by the recipients to the Department of Justice relating to In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation.

The Company is also aware that certain plaintiffs’ counsel in In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust Litigation received from the Louisiana Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General a ~~Civil Investigation Demand~~CID that included a request to produce all deposition transcripts from the civil litigation.

On August 6, 2020, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand from the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Washington seeking information in connection with its investigation of possible violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act and/or the Sherman Act concerning contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce in the market for Broiler Chicken. The Company is cooperating with the investigative demand and providing documents and information as requested by the Office of the Attorney General. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of ~~the investigation~~these investigations at this time.

~~Friends of the Earth, et al v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.~~

On June 22, 2017, the Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint, which was brought by three non-profit organizations (the Organic Consumers Association, Friends of the Earth, and Center for Food Safety) alleged that the Company is violating the California Unfair Competition Law and the California False Advertising Law by representing that its poultry products are “100% Natural” products raised with “100% Natural” farming procedures. Among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that the Company’s products contain residues of human and animal antibiotics, other pharmaceuticals, hormones, steroids, and pesticides. Plaintiffs sought an order enjoining the Company from continuing its allegedly unlawful marketing program and requiring the Company to conduct a corrective advertising campaign; an accounting of the Company’s profits derived from the allegedly unlawful marketing practices; and attorneys’ fees, costs and interest. On August 2, 2017, the Company moved to dismiss the lawsuit on various grounds. On August 23, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which included substantially similar allegations as the original complaint, and the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on September 13, 2017. On February 9, 2018, the Court denied the Company’s motion to dismiss. An initial scheduling conference was held on March 1, 2018, and discovery started thereafter. On June 25, 2018, the plaintiffs amended their complaint for a second time, including to remove allegations that the USDA had found the Company’s chicken samples to contain residues of antibiotics or

~~Table of Contents~~

other substances. On July 9, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. On July 18, 2018, during the pendency of that motion, the parties stipulated to the voluntary dismissal of one of the plaintiff organizations (the Organic Consumers Association). The other two plaintiffs continued to prosecute their claims. On September 11, 2018, the Court granted the motion to dismiss the second amended complaint with leave to amend the complaint, and on October 2, 2018, the remaining plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint. The third amended complaint alleged that the Company misleads consumers with regard to (1) the presence of unnatural residues in its chicken products; (2) the fact that it uses antibiotics in raising its chickens; (3) the conditions in which it raises its chickens; and (4) the risks of human antibiotic resistance caused by the Company’s use of antibiotics. On October 16, 2018, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint, and on December 3, 2018, the Court denied that motion. Fact discovery concluded on March 18, 2019. On April 1, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on grounds that the remaining plaintiffs lacked standing. The Court held a hearing on the Company’s motion on May 30, 2019. On July 31, 2019, the Court granted the Company’s motion without prejudice, stating that dismissal for lack of standing must be without prejudice, but denied the plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. On October 8, 2019, the Court taxed $12,701 in costs in favor of the Company as the prevailing party.

On August 30, 2019, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of the District Court’s order of dismissal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Plaintiffs’ filed their opening brief on appeal on January 8, 2020, the Company filed its response brief on March 9, 2020, and Plaintiffs filed their reply brief on April 29, 2020. The Court held oral argument on October 13, 2020, but has yet to issue a ruling. We intend to vigorously defend the appeal. However, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this action. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company’s reputation and marketing program could be materially, adversely affected, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Judy Jien v. Perdue Farms, Inc., et al.

Table of Contents

On August 30, 2019, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and its Foods and Processing Divisions, as well as ~~seventeen~~17 other poultry producers and their affiliates; Agri Stats, Inc.; and Webber, Meng, Sahl and Company, Inc. (“WMS”), were named in a putative class action filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. ~~Three~~To date, 3 other nearly identical putative class action complaints, each seeking to represent the same putative class, also were filed. The complaints, brought on behalf of non-supervisory production and maintenance employees at broiler chicken processing plants, alleged that the defendants unlawfully conspired by agreeing to fix and depress the compensation paid to them, including hourly wages and compensation benefits, from January 1, 2009 to the present. The plaintiffs claim that broiler producers shared competitively sensitive wage and benefits compensation information in three ways: (1) attending in-person meetings in Destin, Florida; (2) receiving Agri Stats reports, as well as surveys taken and published by WMS; and (3) directly exchanging wage and benefits information with plant managers at other defendant broiler producers. Plaintiffs allege that this conduct violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

On November 12, 2019, the Court ordered that the ~~four~~4 putative class action complaints would be consolidated for all pretrial purposes. The Court ordered plaintiffs to file their consolidated complaint on or before November 14, 2019. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the consolidated complaint were filed on November 22, 2019. Briefing was scheduled to be completed on or before February 28, 2020; however, after the defendants filed their motions to dismiss, on November 26, 2019, plaintiffs notified defendants that they intended to file an amended consolidated complaint. Plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint on December 20, 2019. Plaintiffs name as defendants Sanderson Farms, Inc. and its Foods and Processing Divisions, as well as ~~ten~~10 other broiler chicken producers and their affiliates; ~~three~~3 turkey producers and their affiliates; Agri Stats, Inc.; and WMS. Plaintiffs ~~bring~~brought their amended consolidated complaint on behalf of employees at broiler chicken and turkey processing plants and allege that the defendants unlawfully conspired by agreeing to fix and depress the compensation paid to them. On January 9, 2020 and January 27, 2020, the court approved the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of two of the three nearly identical putative class action lawsuits. On March 12, 2020, the Court approved the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the third nearly identical putative class action lawsuit.

On March 2, 2020, defendants moved to dismiss the amended consolidated complaint. The Company also filed an individual motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against the Company. Plaintiffs’ oppositions were originally due on April 24, 2020 and defendants’ replies were due on May 21, 2020. However, on March 20, 2020, the District of Maryland issued Second Amended Standing Order 2020-02, extending all filing deadlines set to fall between March 16, 2020 and April 24, 2020 by 42 days. On April 10, 2020, the District of Maryland issued Standing Order 2020-07, extending all filing deadlines set to fall between March 16, 2020 and June 5, 2020 by 84 days. On May 22, 2020, the District of Maryland issued Standing Order 2020-11, which affirmed the prior Order's 84-day extension but did not extend deadlines further. Pursuant to Standing Order 2020-07, plaintiffs’After several COVID-19 related extensions, plaintiffs filed their omnibus opposition to defendants’ ~~motion~~motions to dismiss on July 17, 2020. Defendants filed ~~replies~~their reply brief on August 13, 2020. On September 16, 2020, the ~~court~~Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion without prejudice, finding that plaintiffs’ allegations against certain corporate defendant ~~corporate~~ families, including ~~the Company,~~Sanderson Farms, were deficient. ~~On October 16,~~

~~Table~~Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint against Sanderson Farms, Inc. on November 2, 2020. Sanderson Farms filed a renewed motion to dismiss resisting plaintiffs' amended allegations. The Court denied that motion and allowed plaintiffs' case to go forward in an order dated March 10, 2021. Sanderson Farms filed an answer denying the substance of ~~Contents~~

plaintiffs' allegations on April 7, 2021. Discovery in this case is underway.

~~2020, plaintiffs moved~~Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a ~~second amended complaint. Sanderson Farms moved to dismiss the second amended complaint~~Third Amended Complaint on December ~~18, 2020. Briefing~~17, 2021, and the Plaintiffs filed an amended motion for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint on ~~motions~~January 20, 2022. Defendants filed their response to ~~dismiss~~Plaintiffs' motion on February 4, 2022. Plaintiffs' proposed Third Amended Complaint, among other things, adds new allegations, expands the ~~second amended complaint will be complete by February 25,~~putative class to include workers at hatcheries and feed mills, and extends the putative class period to January 1, 2000 through July 20, 2021. ~~No discovery has taken place to date.~~

We intend to defend this case vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

~~La Fosse, et al. v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.~~

On October 11, 2019, three named plaintiffs (Daniel Lentz, Pam La Fosse, and Marybeth Norman) filed, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, a nationwide class action against the Company on behalf of a putative class of all individuals and businesses throughout the United States who purchased one or more of the Company's chicken products in the prior four years. The lawsuit alleges that the named plaintiffs and other class members purchased the Company's chicken products based on misleading representations in the Company’s advertising. Specifically, the plaintiffs in this case allege that the Company’s advertising (including, but not limited to, on its website, television commercials, radio advertisements, social media, print magazines, billboards, and trucks) misleads consumers into believing that (i) the Company’s chickens were not given antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals, (ii) the chickens were raised in a “natural” environment, (iii) there is no evidence that the use of antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals in poultry contributes to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and (iv) the Company’s chicken products do not contain antibiotic or pharmaceutical residues. Plaintiffs allege that (i) the Company “routinely” feeds antibiotics and pharmaceuticals to its chickens, (ii) the Company raises its chickens indoors in “unnatural” indoor conditions amounting to “intensive confinement” and without natural light (iii) there is “extensive” reliable evidence that the use of antibiotics in poultry contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and (iv) the Company’s chickens have been found to contain antibiotic and pharmaceutical residue. The original Complaint asserted five causes of action under California and North Carolina law. The plaintiffs sought injunctive relief directing the Company to correct its practices and to comply with consumer protection laws nationwide. The plaintiffs also sought monetary damages, as well as fees and costs. On December 20, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss. On February 10, 2020, the Court granted the motion to dismiss in part, denied it in part, and granted the plaintiffs leave to amend the Complaint. On March 23, 2020, two of the three original plaintiffs (Pam La Fosse and Marybeth Norman) filed a First Amended Complaint in which they were joined by five additional named plaintiffs purporting to assert claims on behalf of a putative nationwide class of consumers and businesses who purchased the Company's chicken products in the prior four years. The core allegations and theories set forth in the First Amended Complaint are the same as in the original complaint. The First Amended Complaint asserted one cause of action under federal law and sixteen causes of action under the laws of various states. The plaintiffs again sought injunctive relief directing the Company to correct its practices and to comply with consumer protection laws nationwide, as well as monetary damages, fees and costs. On May 6, 2020, the Company filed a partial motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, which the Court granted on July 2, 2020 with leave to amend. On July 23, 2020, plaintiffs Pam La Fosse and Sharon Manier filed a Second Amended Complaint on behalf of a putative class of consumers who purchased the Company's chicken in California in the prior four years. Like the earlier iterations of the complaint, the Second Amended Complaint alleges that the remaining plaintiffs and other class members purchased the Company's chicken products based on misleading representations in the Company's advertising, including for the reasons set forth in their prior complaints. The plaintiffs again seek injunctive relief, monetary damages, fees and costs. On August 6, 2020, the Company moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in part, requesting dismissal of plaintiffs' new implied warranty of merchantability claim. On August 20, 2020, plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to withdraw their new implied warranty claim. Discovery commenced in October 2020 and is ongoing. We intend to defend this case vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

~~In Defense of Animals, et al. v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.~~

On July 31, 2020, two non-profit organizations (In Defense of Animals and Friends of the Earth) filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint asserts substantially similar (and in many cases identical) allegations and claims against the Company as the prior case brought by Friends of the Earth and other organizations, which the court dismissed in July 2019 and which is currently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.OtherSpecifically, the plaintiffs assert that the Company violates the California Unfair Competition Law and the California False Advertising Law by representing that its poultry products are “100% Natural” products raised with “100% Natural” farming procedures. Plaintiffs allege that the Company’s advertising (including, but not limited to, on its website, television commercials, radio advertisements, social media, print magazines, billboards, and trucks) misleads consumers into believing that (i) the Company’s chickens were not given antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals, (ii) the chickens were raised in a “natural” environment, (iii) there is no evidence that the use of antibiotics or other pharmaceuticals in poultry

~~Table of Contents~~

contributes to the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and (iv) the Company’s chicken products do not contain antibiotic or pharmaceutical residues. Plaintiffs allege that (i) the Company “routinely” feeds antibiotics and pharmaceuticals to its chickens, (ii) the Company raises its chickens indoors in “unnatural” indoor conditions amounting to “intensive confinement” and without natural light, (iii) there is “extensive” reliable evidence that the use of antibiotics in poultry contributes to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and (iv) the Company’s chickens have been found to contain antibiotic and pharmaceutical residue. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief directing the Company to correct its practices and to comply with consumer protection laws nationwide as well as in the form of a corrective advertising campaign. The plaintiffs also seek fees and costs. On August 12, 2020, the Company agreed to waive service of the complaint. The parties have agreed to stay the case at least through the earlier of April 2, 2021, or the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's decision in the pending appeal in the prior case brought by Friends of the Earth and other organizations. No discovery has taken place to date. We intend to defend this case vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

~~Other~~

On January 30, 2017, the Company received a letter from an attorney representing a putative shareholder demanding that the Company take action against current and/or former officers and directors of the Company for alleged breach of their fiduciary duties. The shareholder asserted that the officers and directors (i) failed to take any action to stop the alleged antitrust conspiracy described above, despite their alleged knowledge of the conspiracy, and (ii) made and/or caused the Company to make materially false and misleading statements by failing to disclose the alleged conspiracy. The shareholder also asserted that certain directors engaged in “insider sales” from which they improperly benefited. In addition to demanding that the officers and directors be sued, the shareholder also demanded that the Company adopt unspecified corporate governance improvements. On February 9, 2017, pursuant to statutory procedures available in connection with demands of this type, the Company’s board of directors appointed a special committee of qualified directors to determine, after conducting a reasonable inquiry, whether it was in the Company’s best interests to pursue any of the actions demanded in the shareholder’s letter. On April 26, 2017, the special committee reported to the Company’s board of directors its determination that it was not in the Company’s best interests to take any of the demanded actions at that time, and that no governance improvements related to the subject matter of the

Table of Contents

demand were needed. On May 5, 2017, the special committee’s counsel informed the shareholder’s counsel of the committee’s determination. As of the date of filing of this report, and to the Company’s knowledge, no legal proceedings related to the shareholder’s demand have been filed.

The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation incidental to its business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined with certainty, management, upon the advice of counsel, is of the opinion that the final outcome of currently pending matters, other than those discussed above, should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

The Company recognizes the costs of legal defense for the legal proceedings to which it is a party in the periods incurred. After a considerable analysis of each case, the Company has determined that no accrual is required for any of the foregoing matters as of January 31, ~~2021.~~2022. Future reserves may be required if losses are deemed reasonably estimable and probable due to changes in the Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of legal strategies, or other factors beyond the Company’s control. Future results of operations may be materially affected by the creation of reserves or by accruals of losses to reflect any adverse determinations in these legal proceedings.

NOTE 9—8—CREDIT AGREEMENT

The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated ~~March 21, 2019,~~April 23, 2021, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of $1.0 billion. Under the credit facility, the Company may not exceed a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 50%. The Company has a ~~one-time~~1-time right, at any time during the term of the agreement, to increase the maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio then in effect by 5 percentage points in connection with the construction of a new poultry complex for the four fiscal quarters beginning on the first day of the fiscal quarter during which the Company gives written notice of its intent to exercise this right. The Company has not exercised this right. The facility also sets a minimum net worth requirement that at January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, was ~~$1.03~~$1.3 billion. The credit is unsecured and, unless extended, will expire on ~~March 21, 2024.~~April 23, 2026. As of January 31, ~~2021 and February 24, 2021,~~2022, the Company had ~~borrowed $55.0 million,~~no outstanding borrowings and had approximately ~~$25.2~~$24.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving ~~$919.8~~$975.9 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility. As of February 23, 2022, the Company had no outstanding borrowings and had approximately $29.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving $970.9 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility.

NOTE ~~10—~~9—INCOME TAXES

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 was ~~25.7%~~23.8%, as compared to an estimated annual effective tax rate of ~~24.5%~~25.7%, for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Excluding the effects of discrete items recognized during the periods, the Company's estimated annual effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 would have ~~been~~remained approximately 23.8%, as compared to an estimated annual effective tax rate of ~~24.0%~~23.8% for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full fiscal year ~~2021,~~2022, exclusive of discrete items, will be approximately 23.8%.

As of January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company's deferred income tax liability was ~~$142.8~~$160.5 million, as compared to ~~$141.7~~$156.5 million at October 31, ~~2020,~~2021, an increase of ~~$1.1~~$3.9 million.

NOTE ~~11—SUBSEQUENT EVENT~~10—MERGER AGREEMENT

~~Our operations in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi were affected~~On August 8, 2021, the Company agreed to be acquired by a ~~significant winter weather event that began impacting~~joint venture between Cargill, Inc. (“Cargill”) and Continental Grain Company (“CGC”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Walnut Sycamore Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), Sycamore Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), and solely for purposes of certain provisions specified therein, Wayne Farms LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, pursuant to which, among other things, Merger Sub will be merged with and into the ~~region on or around February 13, 2021. Because~~Company (the “Merger”), with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and as an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. Under the terms of the record low temperatures, power failures, snow and ice, and hazardous road conditions, we were unable during the week of February 15, 2021, to operate our processing plants in those states, deliver day old chicks to broiler farms on our regular schedule, pick up hatching eggs from breeder farms and place those eggs in our hatcheries on our regular schedule, or manufacture and deliver chicken feed to the farms of our independent contract producers on our regular schedule. None of our facilities were damaged, our employees remained safe and we returned to normal operations on February 22, 2021, except for our Hazlehurst, Mississippi processing plant, which returned to normal operations on February 23, 2021. However, our live production supply chain experienced interruptions and losses. We lost 455,000 broilers in houses that either lost water, power or feed, or collapsed under the weight of snow and ice. Because the hazardous road conditions prevented us from delivering day old chicks to broiler farms on our regular schedule, we were forced to humanely euthanize 545,000 chicks in our Texas hatcheries. We also were unable to pick up and place approximately 703,000 hatching eggs in our hatcheries on our normal schedule.

As a result of these interruptions, we will have approximately 1.6 million fewer chickens to process at Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi processing plants than originally planned. These losses represent just under 1%Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the ~~number of birds we expected to process during our second quarter of fiscal 2021, prior to the impacts~~Company, other than certain excluded shares, will receive $203 per share in cash. The closing of the winter storms. In addition, both breeder and broiler chickens exposed to extreme temperatures typically suffer some performance losses over their lives. We are in the process of estimating the total financial impact of this event. While the Company is insured for catastrophic events such as this one, it retains $2.75 million of the risk andMerger is subject to the receipt of specified regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions including, among other things, expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the "HSR Waiting Period"). On December 20, 2021, the Company and Parent each received a ~~seven day deductible under its business interruption coverage.~~request for additional information and documentary material (the "Second Request") from the Department of Justice (the "DOJ") in connection with the DOJ's review of the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Issuance of the Second Request extends the HSR Waiting Period until 30 days after both the Company and Parent have substantially complied with the Second Request, unless

Table of Contents

the waiting period is terminated earlier by the DOJ or extended by agreement of the Company and Parent. The Company and Parent will ~~seek reimbursement for all of~~continue to cooperate with the DOJ staff in its ~~insured losses. Insured losses related to damaged or destroyed inventory and direct expenses incurred as a result~~review of the ~~event~~transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The parties expect that the Merger will be ~~recorded~~completed in the ~~second quarter~~first half of fiscal 2021, up to the $2.75 million retained risk, and such losses that exceed that amount will be recorded as an insurance receivable. Recoveries for lost revenue and reduced margins as a result of business interruption will be recognized as calculations of the claims are completed and agreements with our insurance carriers are reached.calendar year 2022.

1816

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

This Quarterly Report, and other periodic reports filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and other written or oral statements made by it or on its behalf, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "Safe Harbor" provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions about future events and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs and estimates expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the risks described in the "Risk Factors" section of our latest 10-K and 10-Q reports, and the following:

(1)Changes in the market price for the Company’s finished products and feed grains, both of which may fluctuate substantially and exhibit cyclical characteristics typically associated with commodity markets.

(2)Changes in economic and business conditions, monetary and fiscal policies or the amount of growth, stagnation or recession in the global or U.S. economies, any of which may affect the value of inventories, the collectability of accounts receivable or the financial integrity of customers, and the ability of the end user or consumer to afford protein.

(3)Changes in the political or economic climate, trade policies, laws and regulations or the domestic poultry industry of countries to which the Company or other companies in the poultry industry ship product, and other changes that might limit the Company’s or the industry’s access to foreign markets.

(4)Changes in laws, regulations, and other activities in government agencies and similar organizations applicable to the Company and the poultry industry and changes in laws, regulations and other activities in government agencies and similar organizations related to food safety.

(5)Various inventory risks due to changes in market conditions, including, but not limited to, the risk that net realizable values of live and processed poultry inventories might be lower than the cost of such inventories, requiring a downward adjustment to record the value of such inventories at the lower of cost or net realizable value as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

(6)Changes in and effects of competition, which is significant in all markets in which the Company competes, and the effectiveness of marketing and advertising programs. The Company competes with regional and national firms, some of which have greater financial and marketing resources than the Company.

(7)Changes in accounting policies and practices adopted voluntarily by the Company or required to be adopted by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

(8)Disease outbreaks affecting the production, performance and/or marketability of the Company’s poultry products, or the contamination of its products.

(9)Changes in the availability and cost of labor and growers.

(10)The loss of any of the Company’s major customers.

(11)Inclement weather that could hurt Company flocks or otherwise adversely affect the Company's operations, or changes in global weather patterns that could affect the supply and price of feed grains.

(12)Failure to respond to changing consumer preferences and negative or competitive media campaigns.

(13)Failure to successfully and efficiently start up and run a new plant or integrate any business the Company might acquire.

(14)Unfavorable results from currently pending litigation and proceedings, or litigation and proceedings that could arise in the future.

1917

Table of Contents

(15)Changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, which could exacerbate any of the risks described above, and could include: high absentee rates that have prevented and may continue to prevent us from running some of our facilities at full capacity, or could in the future cause facility closures; an inability of our contract growers to manage their flocks; supply chain disruptions for feed grains; further changes in customer orders due to shifting consumer patterns; disruptions in logistics and the distribution chain for our products; liquidity challenges; and a continued or worsening decline in global commercial activity, among other unfavorable conditions.

(16)Risks relating to the Company’s entry into a definitive agreement to be acquired by a joint venture between Cargill, Incorporated (“Cargill”) and Continental Grain Company (“CGC”), including: the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any required governmental or regulatory approvals of the proposed transaction and the related transactions involving affiliates of Cargill and CGC that could reduce the anticipated benefits of or cause the parties to abandon the proposed transaction; risks related to the satisfaction of the conditions to closing the proposed transaction (including the failure to obtain necessary regulatory approvals), and the related transactions involving affiliates of Cargill and CGC, in the anticipated timeframe or at all; the risk that any announcements relating to the proposed transaction could have adverse effects on the market price of the Company's common stock; disruption from the proposed transaction making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships, including retaining and hiring key personnel and maintaining relationships with the Company's customers, vendors and others with whom it does business; the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement entered into pursuant to the proposed transaction or of the transactions involving affiliates of Cargill and CGC; risks related to disruption of management's attention from the Company's ongoing business operations due to the proposed transaction; significant transaction costs; and the risk of litigation and/or regulatory actions related to the proposed transaction or unfavorable results from litigation and proceedings that could arise in the future.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Sanderson Farms. Each such statement speaks only as of the day it was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or to revise any forward-looking statements. The factors described above cannot be controlled by the Company. When used in this report, the words “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” “should,” “outlook,” and “anticipates” and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements about management’s beliefs about future growth plans, earnings, production levels, capital expenditures, grain prices, global economic conditions, supply and demand factors and other industry conditions.

GENERAL

The Company’s poultry operations are fully, vertically-integrated through its control of all functions ~~relative~~relating to the production of its chicken products, including hatching egg production, hatching, feed manufacturing, raising chickens to marketable age (“grow-out”), processing and marketing. Consistent with the poultry industry, the Company’s profitability is substantially affected by the market price for its finished products and feed grains, both of which may fluctuate substantially and independently of each other, and exhibit cyclical characteristics typically associated with commodity markets. Other costs, excluding feed grains, related to the profitability of the Company’s poultry operations, including hatching egg production, hatching, growing, and processing cost, are responsive to efficient cost containment programs and management practices.

The Company believes that value-added products are subject to less price volatility and generate higher, more consistent profit margin than whole chickens ice-packed and shipped in bulk form. To reduce its exposure to market cycles that have historically characterized commodity chicken market prices, the Company has increasingly concentrated on the production and marketing of value-added product lines with emphasis on product quality, customer service, and brand recognition. However, the Company cannot eliminate its exposure to fluctuations in commodity market prices for chicken since market prices for value-added products also ~~exhibit cycles.~~demonstrate cyclical characteristics typical of commodity markets. The Company adds value to its poultry products by performing one or more processing steps beyond the stage where the whole chicken is first salable as a finished product, such as cutting, deboning, deep chilling, packaging and labeling the product.

The ~~Company’s~~Company also has a prepared chicken product line that includes approximately 4050 institutional and consumer-packaged chicken items that it sells nationally, primarily to distributors and food service establishments. A majority of the prepared chicken items are made to the specifications of food service users.

COVID-19

~~During the second quarter of our fiscal 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic.~~ The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related governmental actions to contain the spread of the novel coronavirus have materially affected our business, including our labor force, revenues, expenses, production levels, and senior management's time, among other things.

Table of Contents

In late February 2020, we formed a COVID-19 response team of senior managers, including our CEO, President, and CFO, to coordinate our ~~Company's~~ response to the pandemic and manage and mitigate related risks. From late February to late September 2020, the team met twice daily to discuss COVID-19 developments affecting our business and the communities in which we operate. Beginning in late September 2020, the team began meeting once daily, rather than twice. Additionally, our Board of Directors has actively overseen our management of and response to the ~~crisis. Between March 13, 2020 and early June 2020,~~pandemic. During the first few months of the pandemic, the Board met weekly to receive updates and discuss our response ~~to the pandemic~~ with our executive ~~leadership. In early June 2020,~~leadership team. Today, the Board ~~began meeting generally every two weeks, or more frequently if circumstances warranted, and in August 2020, the Board began meeting~~continues to receive COVID-19-related updates on ~~an as needed~~a monthly basis. ~~Throughout the pandemic, regardless of meeting frequency, the Board has received weekly materials providing operational and COVID-19-related updates.~~

Our top priority throughout the crisis has been protecting the health, safety and welfare of our employees. In consultation with infectious disease specialists and epidemiologists, including an infectious disease expert who toured our facilities, we ~~have taken~~implemented a number of steps and procedures to promote health and safety in our operations. We ~~also frequently communicate~~continue to consult with ~~state~~experts and ~~local officials~~update our protocols and ~~health departments regarding our practices. Some~~procedures as the number of ~~our practices are more stringent than those recommended by~~infections nationwide and in the ~~Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Our practices~~areas in which we operate fluctuates. Practices that remain in place include, but are not limited ~~to:~~

~~Table of Contents~~

to, the following:

•We ~~implemented strict personal and work-related travel and public gathering restrictions for all of our employees, contractors and members of their households.~~

•Athave on-site medical clinics at each of our processing plants ~~we set up on-site medical clinics, which~~that are staffed by third-party medical providers. ~~At these~~The clinics provide telemedicine services, flu and coronavirus tests, and flu and coronavirus vaccinations ~~are provided~~ at no cost ~~for our employees. Additionally, we are communicating and coordinating with our third-party medical providers and state and local health officials in preparation for utilizing these clinics~~ to ~~provide coronavirus vaccinations once they become available for~~ our employees.

•We are providing information about the novel coronavirus and measures to mitigate the risk of contracting and transmitting the virus on video displays throughout our facilities and on our employee mobile app. We have also provided live training sessions about the virus to our hourly employees. Each of these aforementioned communications is provided in the languages spoken by our employee population.

•~~We have created an internal hotline monitored by our nurses at our general corporate offices that employees may call to ask questions or voice concerns about the virus.~~

•~~Non-essential visitors may not enter our facilities.~~

•We are taking the temperature of each person attempting to enter our facilities. Anyone with a temperature of 100°F or higher is denied entry. Employees denied entry are sent home with pay and are asked to contact their healthcare provider.

•Our Company nurses have received specialized training on identifying COVID-19 symptoms. Employees exhibiting symptoms while at work are immediately sent home with pay and are asked to contact a healthcare provider immediately.

•~~Employees who test positive for COVID-19, those who live in the same household as someone who has tested positive, and those who work in close proximity to an~~Any employee who ~~has tested positive are sent home to isolate or self-quarantine with pay. The specific isolation or quarantine period varies based on individual circumstances but generally ranges from 10 to 24 days.~~

•We continuously look for commonalities among our employees who test positive, including geographic concentrations in their places of residence, so we can reduce or prevent the spread of the virus in our facilities.

•~~We sent home for 14 days, with pay, approximately 400 employees who work in our Moultrie, Georgia facility and are residents of~~becomes fully-vaccinated against COVID-19 receives a ~~nearby county that experienced a high rate of community infections.~~

•We are providing and requiring employees, United States Department of Agriculture inspectors and essential visitors to wear face masks and/or face shields. Anyone on the premises of our processing plants, feed mills, hatcheries and vehicle maintenance shops is required to wear this equipment. Where an employee's job function does not permit him or her to wear a face shield, we require the employee to wear safety glasses.$1,000 bonus.

•In areas of our facilities where space allows, we have implemented social distancing measures, and in areas where equipment configurations allow, we have installed physical barriers between work stations. ~~In areas where social distancing or the installation of physical barriers is not achievable, the use of face shields is mandatory.~~ Additionally, we have optimized ventilation throughout our facilities to mitigate the risk of exposure to the virus. We are also providing and requiring employees and essential visitors at our general corporate offices and our laboratory to wear face masks while in common areas and in instances where social distancing is not achievable.

•~~Our nurses have N95 respirator masks, gowns, gloves and goggles appropriate for contact with potentially infected people.~~

•We require employees to practice social distancing on breaks and have staggered break times to reduce the number of people in break areas at any one time. We have installed physical partitions in our break rooms to provide barriers between employees and have erected tents outside of our facilities to provide employees with more space during breaks.

•~~We have installed additional hand sanitizer stations appropriate for use in food processing facilities at all our facilities.~~

•A third-party sanitation service provider performs an antiviral sanitation process as needed at ~~each of~~ our facilities, ~~at least weekly,~~ and we have increased the frequency of cleaning common areas and frequently touched surfaces.

•~~Salaried employees who are considered to be at high risk for severe illness from~~We continuously track COVID-19 ~~are permitted to work from home, provided their job duties allow for remote work.~~positive cases and exposure within our workforce, and impose isolation or quarantine periods that vary based on individual circumstances.

~~Table of Contents~~

•In November 2020, we adopted a practice to temporarily send home, with pay, employees ages 65 or older who work at Company locations at which the number of positive coronavirus cases as a percentage of total employees at the location reaches a certain threshold. This has been triggered at only two locations.

•~~We have closed our Company-owned childcare facility in Collins, Mississippi until further notice.~~

•In certain of our facilities that are located in communities that experienced high infection rates, we cooperated with local health authorities or determined on our own to test all our employees at the facility for coronavirus. Employees who tested positive were sent home with pay for the periods described above. To date, we have performed five facility-wide tests resulting in positive rates per employee tested of 3.3%, 0.5%, 5.8%, 3.3% and 7.3%.

~~During the~~The COVID-19 ~~pandemic, we have also provided assistance to our employees including, but not limited to, the following:~~

•As a food producer, we have been designated by the federal government as part of the United States' critical infrastructure with a special responsibility to continue operations. Therefore, from late-March 2020 through mid-September 2020, we paid hourly employees who worked all of their scheduled hours during a week an attendance bonus equal to $1.00 per hour.

•~~We enhanced our health plan to provide for 100% coverage of testing and treatment of COVID-19 at no cost to plan participants.~~

•~~We provided detailed guidance to our employees on the steps to take to ensure timely receipt of the stimulus payment provided under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.~~

•We distributed written materials to our employees in all languages appropriate for our employee population to inform them about COVID-19 risks and encourage good personal hygiene, cleaning and social distancing practices away from work and when carpooling to work to protect themselves and their families.

•~~We have given our employees free bottles of hand sanitizer which they may refill from supplies at our facilities and washable masks for them and their families.~~

•~~We have given free, 10-pound packages of fresh chicken to our employees in connection with several holidays.~~

•Because demand for the products we produce at our prepared chicken facility significantly decreased during the early stages of the pandemic, we ran fewer shifts at that facility. We assisted our employees at the plant in filing for unemployment benefits due to their reduced work hours.

~~We have continued to serve our customers and support our communities:~~

•As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the nation's restaurants have been forced to operate at significantly reduced capacity or to close completely. As a result, our retail grocery store customers experienced a surge in demand for food to be prepared at home. Because of the significant decrease in demand from our food service customers, during the second quarter of fiscal 2020 we were able to divert approximately 4.3 million head of chickens from our big bird program to be processed at our plants that serve retail grocery store customers. To accomplish this, we increased the number of shifts at our plants that process retail product, and we have not experienced any significant delays or other hindrances in our shipment of products to our retail grocery store customers.

•~~Since the beginning of the pandemic, we have donated over 1.4 million pounds of chicken to employees, food banks and other relief organizations.~~

•~~During the pandemic, we have donated tens of thousands of N95, KN95, disposable and washable masks to a number of hospitals and community organizations.~~

~~On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted. The CARES Act affects the Company in several areas including, but not limited to, the following:~~

•It allows for the deferral of the employer portion of social security payroll tax payments that would have otherwise been paid between the enactment date and December 31, 2020. We used this provision to increase our available liquidity. During fiscal 2020, we deferred approximately $20.7 million, and duringresponse team met daily throughout the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021, we deferred an additional $6.5 million, resulting in a total deferral of approximately $27.2 million that would have been a cash outflow in~~2022 to coordinate our response to the ~~absence~~threat of the ~~CARES Act. Fifty percent of this deferral is due during calendar year 2021 and fifty percent is due during calendar year 2022. We intend to remit approximately $20.7 million~~new Omicron variant of the ~~deferred payroll taxes~~virus, which significantly impacted all of the communities in which we operate. As the number of cases dropped significantly during February 2022, the team transitioned to meeting on ~~or before June 15, 2021 and the remaining $6.5 million on or before June 15, 2022, so~~an as needed basis.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~that we are able to deduct the corresponding payroll tax expenses on our fiscal 2020 and 2021 income tax returns, respectively.~~

•The Employee Retention Credit, a refundable, wage-related tax credit, was made available to eligible employers. We recognized a $3.5 million benefit, before income taxes, related to this credit during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2020, and we recognized an additional $1.1 million benefit, before income taxes, related to this credit during our first quarter of fiscal 2021.

~~EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW OF RESULTS~~

~~For~~In the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, we ~~reported net income of $9.5~~incurred approximately $6.8 million ~~or $0.42 per share, as compared~~in costs directly related to a net loss of $38.6 million, or $1.76 per share during the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The significant improvement in our results is primarily attributable to higher average selling prices for our products, slightly offset by higher average costs of goods sold. Our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2021 continued to be affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary impacts were:

•Orders from food service customers declined dramatically during the second quarter of fiscal 2020 due to widespread closures or significant reductions in operating capacity of restaurants and other venues where food is consumed away from home. Since that time, demand from our largest food service customers has fluctuated from week to week, coinciding with the fluctuating governmental restrictions placed on the restaurant industry. The average weekly volume sold to our largest food service customers during our first quarter of fiscal 2021 ranged from 72% to 105% of levels seen before the pandemic. The impact of fluctuating demand is evidenced by the Urner Barry quote for boneless breast meat. In mid-May 2020, the quoted price reached $1.58 per pound before falling to $0.97 per pound in mid-June and recovering to $1.19 per pound by August 5, 2020. The quoted price fell to $0.86 per pound by October 5, 2020, was $1.32 per pound on January 31, 2021, and has now risen further to $1.45 per pound as of February 24, 2021. We believe the most recent improvement in the quoted market price is attributable, at least in part, to an increase in demand from quick-service restaurant chains that are featuring or planning to feature chicken products on their menus. In addition, we expect demand from food service customers will improve as more consumers dine away from home as governmental restrictions are relaxed or lifted in certain areas of the country and as the number of people vaccinated for COVID-19 increases.

•We announced during our second fiscal quarter of 2020 that, in response to reduced demand from food service customers caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, we would reduce production at plants processing a larger bird for food service customers. Additionally, we reduced the target live weight for our Hazlehurst, Mississippi plant from a big bird size to a chill-pack size, and the birds processed at that plant reached the target live weight on or about November 23, 2020. As a result of the production cuts and the lower live weight in Hazlehurst, we processed 1.15 billion pounds of dressed poultry during the first fiscal quarter of 2021, down 1.6% from the 1.17 billion pounds processed during the first fiscal quarter of 2020.

•The demand shift to food prepared at home caused demand from our retail grocery store customers to surge during the early stages of the pandemic, and that demand remains strong as a result of the fluctuating options available for dining away from home and some consumers' unwillingness to dine away from home in close proximity to others.

•Demand for our products from our traditional export partners was soft following the onset of the pandemic. Many countries to which we export our products faced myriad issues ranging from lack of liquidity to logistical challenges as a result of COVID-19. These challenges created volatility in most export markets, although demand and pricing for chicken paws sold to China has remained strong throughout the pandemic. During the first two months of fiscal 2021, demand and pricing for products typically sold for export, such as leg quarters and drumsticks, remained soft; however, demand and pricing for those products improved significantly beginning in January 2021 and continuing into February. We believe this strength is the result of several factors, including higher crude oil prices and the value of the United States dollar in relation to other foreign currencies.

•Our top priority throughout the crisis has been protecting the health, safety and welfare of our employees. As a result, the first quarter of fiscal 2021 includes approximately $11.4 million in direct COVID-19 costs forincluded payroll expenses for employees who ~~are~~were quarantined, vaccination bonuses, and items and services related to workplace safety, including personal protective equipment, thermometers, barriers and other social-distancing measures, professional cleaning, on-site medical clinics, and additional nursing staff, among other things. By comparison, our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2021 included approximately $11.4 million in direct COVID-19 expenses.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW OF RESULTS

For the first quarter of fiscal 2022, we earned net income of $192.8 million, or $8.64 per share, as compared to net income of $9.5 million, or $0.42 per share, during the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The significant improvement in our results during the first quarter of fiscal 2022 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2021 is primarily attributable to an increase in the average selling prices for our products of $0.3129 per pound sold, or 40.3%, partially offset by an increase in feed costs per pound of broilers processed of $0.0655, or 24.9%, and higher labor and other variable costs.

The increase in average selling prices for fresh and frozen chicken products during the first quarter of fiscal 2022 versus the same quarter a year ago reflects significantly higher realized prices for products from our plants that process a larger bird primarily for food service customers and further processors. These prices are determined by contractually negotiated formulas based on published quotes for commodity chicken products. The quoted market prices typically move higher or lower based on the supply and demand dynamics of chicken products sold into the food service market. The higher quoted market prices during the quarter reflect significantly improved demand from food service customers as consumers continue to become more comfortable dining away from home given improving pandemic conditions, combined with a limited supply and elevated prices of competing proteins. Although we produce little for this market, demand is particularly strong from quick service restaurants featuring chicken sandwich menu items. In addition, wing concept restaurants have operated well throughout the pandemic, and demand for wing products remains good. This strong demand for chicken has coincided with constraints on the supply side, including limited capacity expansion in the industry due to labor shortages and supply chain logistics. In addition, the United States Department of Agriculture reports low hatchability rates for hatching eggs and well below average livability rates for broiler chickens. Finally, while somewhat constrained by logistical challenges, export demand has improved relative to a year ago, which has impacted domestic supplies.

Realized prices for products sold to retail grocery store customers were also higher when compared to a year ago. These prices are typically negotiated on an annual basis, use either a flat price or a pricing formula based on a regularly quoted market price, and are fixed for one to three years. However, many of these contracts provide that either party can request price

Table of Contents

adjustments during the term of the agreements to reflect material changes in grain and other costs and other factors. While neither party is required to adjust prices, we were able to negotiate price increases during the contract terms with some of our grocery store customers over the past few quarters to reflect materially higher grain costs. A portion of the price increases were fully reflected in the first quarter of fiscal 2022, resulting in a 7.0% increase in average realized prices for products sold to retail grocery store customers when compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2021. Additionally, a larger portion of the negotiated price increases were effective either during January or February 2022 and will be fully reflected in our second fiscal quarter. Despite these price increases, however, our margins earned on products sold to retail grocery stores during the first fiscal quarter declined significantly, due in part to higher grain costs, as discussed below.

Demand for our products from our traditional export partners has improved from levels we experienced during the early stages of the pandemic. We believe this relative strength is the result of several factors, including the benefit of higher crude oil prices to countries whose economies depend on oil, the value of the United States dollar in relation to foreign currencies, and the lessening of governmental restrictions related to COVID-19.

However, during December 2021, a highly pathogenic strain of avian influenza ("AI") was detected in North America and has since been detected in many wild birds and five commercial poultry flocks within the eastern and central United States. China and Mexico, the top two countries by volume and value to which we export, will initially ban all product from any state where AI is detected in a commercial flock. Mexico will subsequently initiate a process to coordinate with United States officials to reduce the ban from a statewide level to a county level as specified information regarding detection and remediation of AI is provided. To date, AI has not been detected in a commercial flock in a state where we operate, so we have not experienced any material disruptions to our operations or export sales. We have initiated our Crisis Management Response for Avian Influenza and are taking appropriate and best practice steps to protect the health of our flocks. However, we cannot be certain one or more of our flocks won't be affected by the AI virus.

During fiscal 2021, we sold 444.1 million pounds of product to customers in Mexico at a gross sales value of approximately $228.3 million, and we sold 91.8 million pounds of product to customers in China at a gross sales value of approximately $121.7 million. If our exports to Mexico are banned, we would be forced to seek alternative markets for products sold to that market at potentially lower returns. The primary products we export to China are chicken paws and wing tips. Because there are no material domestic or export markets for these products other than China, we would be forced to render those products for significantly lower returns if our exports to China are banned.

Our higher average cost of goods sold during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to the same ~~quarter~~period a year ago reflects increases in both non-feed related costs of goods sold, details of which are described in the "Results of Operations" section below, and in feed costs per pound of chicken processed. ~~When combined, the~~The average cash prices paid by the Company for ~~corn and soybean meal~~grain were significantly higher during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020,~~

~~Table of Contents~~

2021, which contributed to an increase in feed costs in broiler flocks processed. Unfavorable growing conditions and weather events in certain areas of the United States during the late summer and fall of 2020 caused corn and soybean production in the United States to fall below levels that were originally estimated by the United States Department of Agriculture and other industry analysts. The production shortfall, combined with significant export demand ~~have contributed to current market prices for feed grains that are significantly higher than prices paid by~~and uncertainty about the ~~Company during fiscal 2020. We have priced a significant portion of our corn basis through July~~ 2021 ~~and a significant portion of our soybean meal basis through October 2021. Although we have priced significant portions of our basis needs, we have priced none of our actual~~ corn and soybean ~~meal~~crops, contributed to significantly higher market prices during fiscal 2021. Market prices for grain began to moderate during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021, but remain elevated compared to the pricing environment during the first quarter of fiscal 2021. The Company has priced very little of its grain needs past ~~March 2021.~~February 2022. Had we priced our remaining fiscal ~~2021 grain~~2022 needs at February ~~24, 2021~~22, 2022 cash market prices quoted on the Chicago Board of Trade, we estimate our costs of feed grains based on ~~2020~~fiscal 2021 volumes would be approximately ~~$325.4~~$144.0 million higher during fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. Based on our projected production levels for ~~the remainder of the~~ fiscal ~~year,~~2022, we estimate that ~~those~~ higher grain costs, along with estimated basis costs, would result in approximately ~~$0.0668~~$0.0339 per pound higher feed costs in broiler flocks processed for fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. These numbers are estimates and are subject to change as we move through the balance of the ~~year.~~year and as grain prices and actual production levels fluctuate.

~~Our overall cost structure will be higher~~We processed 1.21 billion pounds of dressed poultry during the first fiscal ~~2021 than~~quarter of 2022, up 4.4% from the 1.15 billion pounds processed during the first fiscal quarter of 2021. The increase in ~~fiscal 2020, primarily because~~pounds processed resulted from a 4.2% increase in the number of ~~higher grain prices.~~head processed, partially offset by a slight decrease in the average live weight of the birds processed. We ~~believe that demand~~reduced production at our plants processing a larger bird for ~~our products from retail grocery stores will continue to be strong as consumers continue to prepare more food at home than prior to the pandemic. While we expect some improvement in~~ food service customers at the onset of the pandemic in response to reduced demand and labor and logistical challenges. As those conditions moderate, we ~~believe this trend~~intend to return to full production. We now estimate we will ~~continue to some extent because we expect, among other factors:~~

•~~people will continue to work from home in higher numbers than before~~process 1.19 billion pounds of dressed poultry during the ~~pandemic;~~

•~~some restaurants will remain closed, there will be reduced capacity at open restaurants due to social distancing restrictions~~second quarter of fiscal 2022, 1.26 billion pounds of dressed poultry during the third quarter of fiscal 2022, and ~~some consumers will continue to choose not to dine in restaurants for safety reasons;~~1.27 billion pounds during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022. These estimates may change based on weather, production decisions, bird weights and

•~~consumers will have lower levels of disposable income due to unemployment and other financial constraints caused by the pandemic.~~ market conditions.

While demand for our retail grocery products ~~is currently favorable~~ and demand from our food service distribution customers ~~has improved,~~continues to be favorable, resulting in selling prices for our products that are more than offsetting the higher prices we are paying for feed grains and other costs, it is uncertain how long these conditions will persist. How long current conditions will last and the future effect of the pandemic on our business will depend on many factors, including:

Table of Contents

•the ~~timing of the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines;~~

•~~whether there are~~extent to which resurgences in COVID-19 infections ~~that~~ make people fearful of dining out or cause state, local and foreign governments to extend or reimpose stay-at-home restrictions, as well as varying restrictions on restaurants;

•the ~~ability of restaurants to survive financially in depressed business conditions, and the~~ extent to which ~~the volume of food sold by restaurants is affected by required social distancing measures that reduce the number of customers they can serve;~~

•~~whether other venues where people eat food away from home, such as sporting events and hotels, resume or increase operations;~~

•~~the extent to which unemployment levels and possible recessionary~~inflationary conditions affect the amount of disposable income consumers have to spend on food and how consumers allocate their food dollars;

•with respect to our export sales, the condition of the oil market, the relative strength of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar, the impact of avian influenza in the U.S., and political uncertainty that could affect trade relations with other countries, especially with China; ~~and~~

•the effect of the pandemic on our operations, including labor shortages we have experienced at various times throughout the pandemic and ~~may~~could continue to experience as a result of the ~~pandemic.~~pandemic; and

~~In addition~~•with respect to feed grain prices, the ~~challenges created by the COVID-19 pandemic, our employees, managers, contractors~~quality and ~~independent contract producers in Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi have navigated the historic winter weather event that began affecting the region on February 13, 2021. Because~~quantity of the ~~record low temperatures, power failures, snow~~2022 corn and ice, and hazardous road conditions, we were unable during the week of February 15, 2021, to operate our processing plants in those states, deliver day old chicks to broiler farms on our regular schedule, pick up hatching eggs from breeder farms and place those eggs in our hatcheries on our regular schedule, or manufacture and deliver chicken feed to the farms of our independent contract producers on our regular schedule. None of our facilities were damaged, our employees remained safe, and we returned to normal operations on February 22, 2021, except for our Hazlehurst, Mississippi processing plant, which returned to normal operations on February 23, 2021. However, our live production supply chain experienced interruptions and losses. We lost 455,000 broilers in houses that either lost water, power or feed, or collapsed under the weight of snow and ice. Because the hazardous road conditions prevented us from delivering day old chicks to broiler farms on our regular schedule, we were forced to

~~Table of Contents~~soybean crops.

~~humanely euthanize 545,000 chicks in our Texas hatcheries. We also were unable to pick up and place approximately 703,000 hatching eggs in our hatcheries on our normal schedule.~~

As a result of these interruptions, we will have approximately 1.6 million fewer chickens to process at Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi processing plants than originally planned. These losses represent just under 1% of the number of birds we expected to process during our second quarter of fiscal 2021, prior to the impacts of the winter storms. In addition, both breeder and broiler chickens exposed to extreme temperatures typically suffer some performance losses over their lives. We are in the process of estimating the total financial impact of this event. While the Company is insured for catastrophic events such as this one, it retains $2.75 million of the risk and is subject to a seven day deductible under its business interruption coverage. The Company will seek reimbursement for all of its insured losses. Insured losses related to damaged or destroyed inventory and direct expenses incurred as a result of the event will be recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2021, up to the $2.75 million retained risk, and such losses that exceed that amount will be recorded as an insurance receivable. Recoveries for lost revenue and reduced margins as a result of business interruption will be recognized as calculations of the claims are completed and agreements with our insurance carriers are reached.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Net sales for the first quarter ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 were ~~$909.3~~$1,327.4 million as compared to ~~$823.1~~$909.3 million for the first quarter ended January 31, ~~2020,~~2021, an increase of ~~$86.2~~$418.1 million, or ~~10.5%~~46.0%. Net sales of poultry products for the first quarter ended January 31, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ were ~~$870.2~~$1,263.1 million and ~~$771.5~~$870.2 million, respectively, an increase of ~~$98.7~~$392.9 million, or ~~12.8%~~45.1%. The increase in net sales of poultry products resulted from a ~~13.0%~~40.5% increase in the average sales price of poultry products sold ~~slightly offset by~~and a ~~0.1% decrease~~3.3% increase in the pounds of poultry products ~~sold.~~sold, each of which is primarily the result of improved demand from food service customers and supply constraints, as discussed in the Executive Overview above. During the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the Company sold ~~1,150.2 million~~1.19 billion pounds of poultry products, ~~down~~up from ~~1,151.8 million~~1.15 billion pounds during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. The ~~decrease~~increase in pounds of poultry products sold resulted primarily from a ~~0.8% decrease~~4.2% increase in the number of head processed, ~~and~~partially offset by a ~~1.1%~~slight decrease in the average live weight of ~~poultry~~the birds processed.

~~Overall, quoted~~Quoted market prices for poultry products increased during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to the same quarter of fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. When compared to the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020,~~2021, Urner Barry average market prices for ~~jumbo wings, tenders and~~boneless thigh meat, boneless breast meat, tenders, leg quarters and jumbo wings increased by ~~34.3%~~187.5%, ~~27.4%~~108.1%, 63.7%, 30.8% and ~~10.5%, respectively, while average quoted market prices for boneless thigh meat and leg quarters decreased by 43.5% and 26.4%~~24.5%, respectively. Average realized prices for chicken products sold to retail grocery store customers increased by ~~3.1%~~7.0% during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 as compared to the same period of fiscal ~~2020~~2021, and ~~continue to reflect strong demand.~~retail grocery store demand remains strong.

Net sales of prepared chicken products for the quarters ended January 31, 2022 and 2021 were $64.4 million and ~~2020 were~~ $39.1 million, ~~and $51.6 million,~~ respectively, ~~representing a decrease~~an increase of ~~24.3%~~64.6%. This ~~decrease~~increase is primarily attributable to a ~~22.4% decrease~~44.4% increase in the pounds of prepared chicken products sold, while the average sales price of prepared chicken products sold also ~~decreased~~increased by ~~2.3%~~14.0%. The increase in pounds and sales price of prepared chicken products was primarily the result of improved demand from our food service customers. During the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the Company sold ~~21.2~~30.6 million pounds of prepared chicken products, ~~down~~up from ~~27.3~~21.2 million pounds during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020. The decrease in pounds of prepared chicken products sold resulted from the decrease in demand from our food service customers due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as described above.~~2021.

Cost of sales for the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 was ~~$839.3~~$1,008.1 million as compared to ~~$823.5~~$839.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020,~~2021, an increase of ~~$15.8~~$168.7 million, or ~~1.9%~~20.1%. Cost of sales of poultry products during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020,~~2021, was ~~$802.3~~$928.8 million and ~~$775.8~~$802.3 million, respectively, which represents a ~~3.6%~~12.1% increase in the average cost of sales per pound of poultry products. As illustrated in the table below, which for comparative purposes includes poultry products transferred to the Company's prepared chicken plant, the increase in the cost of sales per pound of poultry products resulted from ~~a $0.0251 per pound, or 6.0%, increase in other costs of sales of poultry products, and~~ an increase in the cost of feed per pound of broilers processed of ~~$0.0034,~~$0.0655, or ~~1.3%.~~24.9%, and a $0.0279 per pound, or 6.3%, increase in other costs of sales of poultry products.

2521

Table of Contents

Poultry Cost of Sales

(In thousands, except per pound data)


		Three Months Ended January 31, 2021					Three Months Ended January 31, 2020					Incr/(Decr)					Three Months Ended January 31, 2022					Three Months Ended January 31, 2021					Incr/(Decr)
Description	Description	Dollars			Per lb.		Dollars			Per lb.		Dollars		Per lb.		Description	Dollars			Per lb.		Dollars			Per lb.		Dollars		Per lb.
Beginning Inventory	Beginning Inventory	$	32,952		$	0.4701	$	35,121		$	0.3868	$	(2,169)	$	0.0833	Beginning Inventory	$	42,775		$	0.5646	$	32,952		$	0.4701	$	9,823	$	0.0945
Feed in broilers processed	Feed in broilers processed	303,047			0.2631		304,658			0.2597		(1,611)		0.0034		Feed in broilers processed	396,435			0.3286		303,047			0.2631		93,388		0.0655

All other cost of sales	All other cost of sales	508,226			0.4412		488,111			0.4161		20,115		0.0251		All other cost of sales	565,854			0.4691		508,226			0.4412		57,628		0.0279
Reversal of prior-period inventory write-down		—			—		(2,800)			(0.0024)		2,800		0.0024

Less: Ending Inventory	Less: Ending Inventory	30,596			0.4985		37,861			0.3797		(7,265)		0.1188		Less: Ending Inventory	42,912			0.5488		30,596			0.4985		12,316		0.0503
Total poultry cost of sales	Total poultry cost of sales	$	813,629	(1)	$	0.7010	$	787,229	(1)	$	0.6762	$	26,400	$	0.0248	Total poultry cost of sales	$	962,152	(1)	$	0.7992	$	813,629	(1)	$	0.7010	$	148,523	$	0.0982

Pounds:	Pounds:															Pounds:
Beginning Inventory	Beginning Inventory	70,103					90,805									Beginning Inventory	75,757					70,103

Poultry processed/other	Poultry processed/other	1,151,917					1,173,174									Poultry processed/other	1,206,367					1,151,917
Poultry sold	Poultry sold	1,160,646		(1)			1,164,256		(1)							Poultry sold	1,203,933		(1)			1,160,646		(1)
Ending Inventory	Ending Inventory	61,374					99,723									Ending Inventory	78,191					61,374

Note (1) - For comparative purposes, includes the costs and pounds of product sold to the Company's prepared chicken plant.

Other costs of sales of poultry products consists primarily of labor, packaging, freight, maintenance and repairs, utilities, antimicrobial interventions, contract grower pay, chick costs and certain fixed costs. ~~These~~Collectively, these non-feed related costs of poultry products sold increased by ~~$0.0251~~$0.0279 per pound processed, or ~~6.0%~~6.3%, during this year’s first fiscal quarter compared to the same quarter a year ~~ago. This increase is~~ago, primarily attributable to higher labor, packaging, maintenance and repairs and certain ~~fixed~~other variable costs in our processing facilities, ~~slightly~~ higher freight costs incurred for the delivery of finished product, and higher ~~independent contract producer pay, as well as expenses incurred in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 related~~chick costs. COVID-19-related expenses included in other costs of sales of poultry products during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 total approximately ~~$5.3~~$1.6 million and include payroll expenses for employees who ~~are~~were quarantined, ~~and~~vaccination bonuses, expenses related to various items and services including personal protective equipment, thermometers, barriers and other social-distancing measures and additional nursing staff to protect the health and safety of our employees. ~~Excluding the COVID-19 related~~By comparison, COVID-19-related expenses in other costs of sales ~~increased by $0.0206 per pound processed, or 4.9%.~~of poultry products during the first quarter of fiscal 2021 totaled $5.2 million.

Cost of sales of the Company’s prepared chicken products during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 were ~~$37.0~~$79.2 million as compared to ~~$47.7~~$37.0 million during the same quarter a year ago, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$10.7~~$42.2 million, or ~~22.5%~~114.2%. This ~~decrease~~increase was ~~primarily~~ attributable to a ~~22.4% decrease~~44.4% increase in the pounds of prepared chicken sold, ~~which is~~resulting from improved customer demand, and substantially higher costs for the ~~result of reduced demand for prepared~~fresh chicken ~~products from our food service customers due to~~purchased by the ~~COVID-19 pandemic.~~plant.

The Company recorded the value of live broiler inventories on hand at January 31, 2022 and October 31, 2021 at cost. In periods when the Company estimates that the cost to grow live birds in inventory to a marketable age and then process and distribute those birds will be lower in the aggregate than the anticipated sales proceeds, the Company values the broiler inventories on hand at cost and accumulates costs as the birds are grown to a marketable age subsequent to the balance sheet date. In periods when the Company estimates ~~that the cost to grow live birds in inventory to a marketable age, process, and distribute~~ those ~~birds~~costs will be higher in the aggregate than the anticipated sales proceeds, the Company will make an adjustment to ~~lower~~reduce the value of live birds in inventory to the net realizable value. No such ~~charge~~adjustment was required at January 31, ~~2021~~2022 or January 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") costs during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 were ~~$56.6~~$65.7 million, an increase of ~~$7.1~~$9.1 million compared to the ~~$49.5~~$56.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. The following table includes the components of SG&A costs for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021.

2622

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Costs

(in thousands)


Description	Description	Three Months Ended January 31, 2021		Three Months Ended January 31, 2020		Increase/(Decrease)		Description	Three Months Ended January 31, 2022		Three Months Ended January 31, 2021		Increase/(Decrease)
COVID-19-related expense		6,162		—		6,162
Stock compensation expense								Stock compensation expense	8,218		2,402		5,816
Legal expense	Legal expense	8,464		6,485		1,979		Legal expense	11,473		8,464		3,009
Administrative salaries	Administrative salaries	12,357		11,493		864		Administrative salaries	12,899		12,357		542
Sanderson Farms Championship expense								Sanderson Farms Championship expense	2,207		1,950		257
Broker commissions	Broker commissions	3,294		2,587		707		Broker commissions	3,471		3,294		177
Stock compensation expense		2,402		2,495		(93)
Sanderson Farms Championship expense		1,950		2,047		(97)
Trainee expense	Trainee expense	2,986		3,275		(289)		Trainee expense	2,512		2,986		(474)
Advertising expense								Advertising expense	2,127		2,707		(580)
COVID-19-related expense								COVID-19-related expense	5,167		6,162		(995)
All other SG&A	All other SG&A	18,984		21,103		(2,119)		All other SG&A	17,664		16,277		1,387
Total SG&A	Total SG&A	$	56,599	$	49,485	$	7,114	Total SG&A	$	65,738	$	56,599	$	9,139

Regarding the table above, the increase in ~~COVID-19-related~~stock-based compensation expense is primarily attributable to the ~~result~~timing of ~~direct expenses for items and services~~accruals related to the ~~health, safety and welfare~~Company's performance share agreements with key employees, as described in "Part I, Item 1, Note 5 - Stock Compensation Plans" of ~~our employees during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the~~this Form 10-Q. The increase in legal expense is primarily attributable to our ongoing defense of the litigation described in "Part I, Item 1, Note 87 - Commitments and Contingencies" of this Form 10-Q. The ~~decrease~~increase in all other SG&A expenses is primarily the result of ~~lower levels of~~ travel and entertainment expenses returning to a more normal level during a large portion of our first quarter of fiscal 2022 as compared to our first quarter of fiscal 2021, when a ~~result~~substantial portion of business travel was halted due to the ~~COVID-19~~ pandemic.

The Company’s operating income for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 was ~~$13.4~~$253.6 million, as compared to an operating ~~loss~~income for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020~~2021 of ~~$49.9~~$13.4 million. The ~~increase~~improvement in operating ~~income~~results for the period ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, as compared to the same period a year ago, resulted primarily from significantly higher average selling prices, partially offset by higher average costs of goods sold.

Interest expense during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021~~2022 was $0.6 million, as compared to ~~$1.2~~$0.6 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2020. The decrease in interest expense during the first quarter of fiscal 2021, as compared to the same period a year ago, is the result of lower outstanding debt levels during fiscal 2021, in addition to lower interest rates.2021.

The Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 was ~~25.7%~~23.8%, as compared to an estimated annual effective tax ~~rates~~rate of ~~24.5%~~25.7% for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Excluding the effects of discrete items recognized during the periods, the Company's estimated annual effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 would have ~~been~~remained approximately 23.8%, as compared to an estimated annual effective tax rate ~~24.0%~~of 23.8% for the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full fiscal year ~~2021,~~2022, exclusive of discrete items, will be approximately 23.8%. As of January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company's deferred income tax liability was ~~$142.8~~$160.5 million as compared to ~~$141.7~~$156.5 million at October 31, ~~2020,~~2021, an increase of ~~$1.1~~$3.9 million.

During the three months ended January 31, 2022, the Company’s net income was $192.8 million, or $8.64 per share. For the three months ended January 31, 2021, the Company’s net income was $9.5 million, or $0.42 per share. ~~For the three months ended January 31, 2020, the Company’s net loss was $38.6 million, or $1.76 per share.~~ The increase in net income for the ~~first quarter of fiscal 2021, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2020~~comparative periods is primarily attributable to significantly higher average selling prices, partially offset by higher average costs of goods sold. Details related to each of the aforementioned drivers of the changes in net income have been discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s working capital, calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets, at January 31, ~~2021~~2022 was ~~$387.4~~$988.2 million, and its current ratio, calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, was ~~2.6~~3.8 to 1. The Company’s working capital and current ratio at October 31, ~~2020~~2021 were ~~$354.0~~$777.2 million and ~~2.6~~3.5 to 1, respectively. These measures reflect the Company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations and are included here as a measure of the Company’s ~~short term~~short-term market liquidity. The Company’s principal sources of liquidity during fiscal ~~2021~~2022 include cash on hand at October 31, ~~2020,~~2021, cash flows from operations, and funds available under the Company’s revolving credit facility. As described below, the Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated ~~March 21, 2019,~~April 23, 2021, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of $1.0 billion. As of January 31, ~~2021 and February 24, 2021,~~2022, the Company had ~~borrowed $55.0 million~~no outstanding draws under the facility, and had approximately ~~$25.2~~$24.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving ~~$919.8~~ $975.9 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility. As of February 23, 2022, the Company had no outstanding borrowings and had approximately $29.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving $970.9

Table of Contents

million of borrowing capacity available under the facility. Management believes the Company has sufficient liquidity available to meet its needs.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company’s cash position at January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and October 31, ~~2020~~2021 consisted of ~~$50.1~~$685.8 million and ~~$49.1~~$439.3 million, respectively, in cash and short-term cash investments. The Company’s ability to invest cash is limited by covenants in its revolving credit agreement to short-term investments. All of the Company’s cash at January 31, ~~2021~~2022 and October 31, ~~2020~~2021 was held in bank accounts. There were no restrictions on the Company’s access to its cash, and such cash was available to the Company on demand to fund its operations.

Cash flows provided by operating activities during the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 totaled ~~$9.4~~$276.5 million, as compared to cash flows ~~used in~~provided by operating activities of ~~$65.9~~$9.4 million during the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. Cash flows from operating activities increased by ~~$75.3 million, resulting from two primary factors.~~$267.1 million. During the first three months of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the Company realized higher margins due to ~~an increase in~~higher average selling prices, partially offset by ~~an increase in~~higher average costs of goods sold, as compared to the first three months of fiscal ~~2020.~~2021. This increase in cash flows was partially offset by an increase in inventories, especially our live bird and feed inventories, during the first three months of fiscal 2022. The increase in inventories is primarily the result of significantly higher prices paid for corn, our primary feed ingredient, during the first three months of fiscal 2022 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2021. Details related to the corn and soy markets are discussed above in the Executive Overview of Results section. The increase in cash flows between the two periods was further offset by outflows for cash bonuses paid during December 2021. These bonus payments totaled approximately $55.9 million, compared to no such payout during the first quarter of ~~2021, as we began purchasing higher-priced corn and soybean meal during the quarter.~~fiscal 2021.

Cash flows used in investing activities during the first three months of fiscal 2022 and 2021 ~~and 2020~~ were ~~$36.8~~$27.7 million and ~~$71.2~~$36.8 million, respectively. The Company’s capital expenditures during the first three months of fiscal 2022 were approximately $27.9 million, and included approximately $7.8 million for multiple large-scale equipment and building upgrades at multiple complexes and approximately $0.5 million to purchase new vehicles that would have been leased prior to fiscal 2020. Capital expenditures for the first three months of fiscal 2021 were ~~approximately~~ $36.9 million, and included approximately $12.2 million for multiple large-scale equipment and building upgrades at multiple complexes and ~~approximately~~ $4.9 million on construction of a new hatchery in Jones County, Mississippi. Capital expenditures for the first three months of fiscal 2020 were $71.2 million, and included approximately $20.6 million for multiple large-scale equipment and building upgrades at multiple complexes.

Cash flows ~~provided by~~used in financing activities during the three months ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 totaled ~~$28.4~~$2.3 million, as compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of ~~$105.0~~$28.4 million during the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The change in cash flows from financing activities is primarily attributable to the ~~decrease~~change in outstanding borrowings under the Company's revolving credit facility. During the three months ended January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company's outstanding borrowings ~~under the facility totaled $30.0 million~~remained unchanged, as compared to an increase in outstanding borrowings of ~~$110.0~~$30.0 million under the facility during the three months ended January 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

As of February ~~17, 2021,~~14, 2022, the Company's fiscal ~~2021~~2022 capital budget is approximately ~~$173.6~~$201.7 million. The Company expects the ~~2021~~2022 capital budget to be funded by cash on hand, internally generated working capital, cash flows from operations and funds available under the Company's revolving credit facility. The fiscal ~~2021~~2022 capital budget includes an aggregate of approximately ~~$34.9~~$59.5 million for multiple large-scale equipment and building upgrades at multiple complexes ~~$12.4~~and $18.1 million to purchase new vehicles that ~~in previous years~~ would have been leased ~~and $10.1 million for construction of a new hatchery~~prior to ~~replace the hatchery currently in service in Laurel, Mississippi.~~fiscal 2020. Excluding the budgeted amounts for the items detailed above, the fiscal ~~2021~~2022 capital budget is approximately ~~$116.2~~$124.1 million. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change as we move through the remainder of fiscal ~~2021.~~2022.

On October 2, 2020, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to register for possible future sale shares of the Company's common and/or preferred stock. An indeterminate amount of common stock and preferred stock may be offered by the Company in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by the board of directors if and when shares are issued. The registration statement became automatically effective upon filing with the SEC on October 2, 2020.

The Company regularly evaluates both internal and external growth opportunities, including acquisition opportunities and the possible construction of new production assets, and conducts due diligence activities in connection with such opportunities. The cost and terms of any financing to be raised in conjunction with any growth opportunity, including the Company’s ability to raise debt or equity capital on terms and at costs satisfactory to the Company, and the effect of such opportunities on the Company’s balance sheet, are critical considerations in any such evaluation. Covenants in the pending Merger Agreement to which the Company is a party limit the Company's ability to pursue any strategy outside the ordinary course of business.

Revolving Credit Facility

Table of Contents

The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated ~~March 21, 2019,~~April 23, 2021, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of $1.0 billion. Under the credit facility, the Company may not exceed a maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio of 50%. The Company has a one-time right, at any time during the term of the agreement, to increase the maximum debt-to-total capitalization ratio then in effect by five percentage points in connection with the construction of a new poultry complex for the four fiscal quarters beginning on the first day of the fiscal quarter during which the Company gives written notice of its intent to exercise this right. The Company has not exercised this right. The facility also sets a minimum net worth requirement that at January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, was ~~$1.03~~$1.3 billion. The credit is unsecured and, unless extended, will expire on ~~March 21, 2024.~~April 23, 2026. As of January 31, ~~2021 and February 24, 2021,~~2022, the Company had ~~borrowed $55.0 million~~no outstanding draws under the facility and had approximately ~~$25.2~~$24.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving ~~$919.8~~$975.9 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility. As of February 23, 2022, the Company had no outstanding borrowings and had approximately $29.1 million outstanding in letters of credit, leaving $970.9 million of borrowing capacity available under the facility. For more information about the facility, see Item 1.01 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed ~~March 27, 2019.~~

April 28,

~~Table of Contents~~

2021.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We consider accounting policies related to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, long-lived assets, accrued self-insurance, performance share plans, income taxes and contingencies to be critical accounting estimates. These policies are summarized in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

New Accounting Pronouncements

2925

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is a purchaser of certain commodities, primarily corn and soybean meal, for use in manufacturing feed for its chickens. As a result, the Company’s earnings are affected by changes in the price and availability of such feed ingredients. Feed grains are subject to volatile price changes caused by factors described below that include weather, size of harvest, transportation and storage costs and the agricultural policies of the United States and foreign governments. The price fluctuations of feed grains have a direct and material effect on the Company’s profitability.

Generally, the Company commits to purchase feed ingredients for deferred delivery from one month to nine months after the time of the commitment. The grain purchases are made directly with our usual grain suppliers, which are companies in the business of regularly supplying grain to end users, and do not involve options to purchase. Such purchases occur when our chief operating decision maker concludes that market factors indicate that prices at the time the grain is needed are likely to be higher than current prices, or where, based on current and expected market prices for the Company’s poultry products, our chief operating decision maker believes the Company can purchase feed ingredients at prices that will allow the Company to earn a reasonable return for its shareholders. The Company sometimes purchases its feed ingredients for prompt delivery to its feed mills at market prices at the time of such purchases. Market factors considered by our chief operating decision maker in determining whether or not and to what extent to commit to buy grain for deferred delivery include:

•Current market prices;

•Current and predicted weather patterns in the United States, South America, China and other grain producing areas, as such weather patterns might affect the planting, growing, harvesting and yield of feed grains;

•The expected size of the harvest of feed grains in the United States and other grain producing areas of the world as reported by governmental and private sources;

•Current and expected changes to the agricultural policies of the United States and foreign governments;

•The relative strength of United States currency and expected changes therein as it might affect the ability of foreign countries to buy United States feed grain commodities;

•The current and expected volumes of export of feed grain commodities as reported by governmental and private sources;

•The current and expected use of available feed grains for uses other than as livestock feed grains (such as the use of corn for the production of ethanol, which use is generally affected by the price of crude oil); and

•Current and expected market prices for the Company’s poultry products.

The Company purchases physical grain, not financial instruments such as puts, calls or straddles that derive their value from the value of physical grain. Thus, the Company does not use derivative financial instruments as defined in ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivatives for Instruments and Hedging Activities,” or any market risk sensitive instruments of the type contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K. The Company does not enter into any derivative transactions or purchase any grain-related contracts other than the physical grain contracts described above.

Although the Company does not use derivative financial instruments as defined in ASC 815 or purchase market risk sensitive instruments of the type contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K, the commodities that the Company does purchase for physical delivery, primarily corn and soybean meal, are subject to price fluctuations that have a direct and material effect on the Company’s profitability as mentioned above. During the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the Company purchased approximately ~~30.7~~31.3 million bushels of corn and approximately ~~276,820~~285,771 tons of soybean meal for use in manufacturing feed for its live chickens. A $1.00 change in the average market price paid per bushel for corn would have affected the Company’s cash outlays for corn by approximately ~~$30.7~~$31.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021.~~2022. Likewise, a $10.00 change in the price paid per ton for soybean meal would affect the Company’s cash outlays by approximately ~~$2.8~~$2.9 million.

Although changes in the market price paid for feed grains affect cash outlays at the time the Company purchases the grain, such changes do not immediately affect cost of sales. The cost of feed grains is recognized in cost of sales, on a first-in-first-out basis, at the same time that the sales of the chickens that consume the feed grains are recognized. Thus, there is a lag between the time cash is paid for feed ingredients and the time the cost of such feed ingredients is reported in cost of goods sold. For example, corn delivered to a ~~feedmill~~feed mill and paid for one week might be used to manufacture feed the following week. However, the chickens that eat that feed might not be processed and sold for another 48-62 days, and only at that time will the costs of the feed consumed by the chicken become included in cost of goods sold.

3026

Table of Contents

During the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the Company’s average feed cost per pound of broilers processed totaled ~~$0.2631~~$0.3286 per pound. Feed costs per pound of broilers processed consist primarily of feed grains, but also include other feed ingredients such as vitamins, fat and mineral feed supplements. The average feed cost per pound is influenced not only by the price of feed ingredients, but also by the efficiency with which live chickens convert feed into body weight. Factors such as weather, poultry husbandry, quality of feed ingredients and the quality, size and health of the bird, among others, affect the quantity of feed necessary to mature chickens to the target live weight and the efficiency of that process. Generally, however, a $1.00 change in the average price paid per bushel of corn fed to a chicken during its life would have affected average feed cost per pound of broilers processed by ~~$0.0266,~~$0.0260, based on the quantity of grain used during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021.~~2022. Similarly, a $10.00 change in the average price paid per ton of soybean meal would have influenced the average feed cost per pound of broilers processed by $0.0024 during the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021.~~2022.

The following table shows the impact of hypothetical changes in the price of corn and soybean meal on both the Company’s cash flow and cost of goods sold, based on quantities actually purchased in the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021:~~2022:

Feed Ingredient

Quantity Purchased

during the First

Fiscal Quarter of
~~2021~~

2022

Hypothetical Price
Change

Impact on Cash
Outlay

Ultimate Impact on
Feed Cost per
Pound of broilers
Processed

Corn

~~30.7~~31.3 million bushels

$1.00 per bushel

$~~30.7~~31.3 million

$~~0.0266/~~0.0260/lb processed

Soybean meal

~~276,820~~285,771 tons

$10.00 per ton

$~~2.8~~2.9 million

$0.0024/lb processed

The Company’s interest expense is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates in the United States, and when the Company is indebted, it sometimes maintains certain of its debt as fixed rate in nature to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in interest rates. ~~At January 31, 2021~~Although the Company had no fixed-rate debt on its balance ~~sheet; however,~~sheet at January 31, 2022, management believes the potential effects of near-term changes in interest rates on the Company's debt are ~~not material.~~immaterial.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of January 31, ~~2021,~~2022, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 31, ~~2021.~~2022.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended January 31, ~~2021~~2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For information regarding our legal proceedings, refer to "Litigation" within "Part I, Item 1, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 87 - Commitments and Contingencies," which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this quarterly report, you should carefully consider the risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2020,~~2021, including under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” which, along with risks described in this report, are risks we believe could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition and future results. These are not the only risks facing the Company. Other risks and uncertainties we are not currently aware of or that we currently consider immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and future results. Risks we have identified but currently consider immaterial could still materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and future results if our assumptions about those risks are incorrect or if circumstances change.

3127

Table of Contents

There ~~have been~~were no material changes ~~from~~during the period covered in this report to the risk factors previously disclosed in ~~the Company's~~Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~fiscal~~ year ended October 31, ~~2020.~~2021, except as follows:

Operational Risks

Outbreaks of avian disease, such as avian influenza, or the perception that outbreaks may occur, can significantly restrict our ability to conduct our operations and can significantly affect demand for our products.

Events beyond our control, such as the outbreak of avian disease or the perception that an outbreak may occur, even if it does not affect our flocks, could significantly restrict our ability to conduct our operations or our sales. An outbreak of disease could result in governmental restrictions on the import and export of fresh and frozen chicken, including our fresh and frozen chicken products, or other products to or from our suppliers, facilities or customers, or require us to destroy one or more of our flocks. This could result in the cancellation of orders by our customers and create adverse publicity that may have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and prospects. In addition, world-wide fears about avian disease, such as avian influenza, have, in the past, depressed demand for fresh chicken, which adversely affected our sales during and around that time.

In past years there has been substantial publicity regarding a highly pathogenic Asian strain of avian influenza, or AI, known as H5N1, which has affected Asia since 2002 and which has been found in Europe, the Middle East and Africa. It is widely believed that this strain of AI is spread by migratory birds, such as ducks and geese. There have also been some cases where this strain of AI is believed to have passed from birds to humans as humans came into contact with live birds that were infected with the disease.

Until 2015, AI outbreaks in North America had not generated the same level of concern, or received the same level of publicity, or been accompanied by the same reduction in demand for poultry products in certain countries, as that associated with the Asian strains. Beginning in January 2015, however, the United States experienced what some industry observers believe was the worst AI outbreak in United States history during which, according to the United States Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), approximately 7.8 million turkeys and 40.3 million chickens were affected. The affected chickens were almost all hens that lay eggs for the table egg industry, and not broiler chickens such as those we raise.

On February 8, 2022 the highly pathogenic H5N1 strain of AI was discovered in a commercial turkey flock in Indiana and has subsequently been detected in four other commercial poultry flocks, at least one of which was a broiler flock, within the eastern and central United States.

We have a high degree of confidence in our industry’s biosecurity program, but we cannot be certain our flocks or others in our industry will not be significantly affected by AI. Given our high degree of confidence in our biosecurity programs, we believe the primary risks associated with domestic outbreaks of AI are market risks, as many countries to which our industry sells product typically impose bans on the import of broiler meat produced in the United States when AI is found. The extent of the bans varies by country and can range from county-specific, which means product of a certain county is banned, to nationwide, under which any poultry produced in the United States is banned.

While the bans were in place following the 2015 outbreak, the market price for leg quarters fell significantly below historical averages. While domestic demand for broiler meat was not materially affected by the 2015 outbreak, we cannot assure you that additional outbreaks, including the 2022 outbreak, will not materially adversely affect both domestic and international demand for poultry products produced in the United States. Because the virus is carried by migratory water fowl, it is possible the virus could be spread to domestic poultry flocks during any seasonal migration of those water fowl. If AI were to affect a significant number of our flocks, or materially reduce domestic demand for our products, either or both of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation or prospects.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the first quarter of fiscal ~~2021,~~2022, the company repurchased shares of its common stock as follows:

Period
(a) Total Number of
Shares Purchased(1)
(b) Average Price
Paid per Share
(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or
Programs(2)
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs(2) (3)
Nov. 1 - Nov. 30, 2020 13,209 $ 127.97 13,209 2,000,000
Dec. 1 - Dec. 31, 2020 1,410 131.62 1,410 2,000,000
Jan. 1 - Jan. 31, 2021 — — — 2,000,000
Total 14,619 $ 128.32 14,619 2,000,000


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)	(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2)	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(2) (3)
Nov. 1 - Nov. 30, 2021	10,944	$	191.46	10,944	2,000,000
Dec. 1 - Dec. 31, 2021	4,498	189.93		4,498	2,000,000
Jan. 1 - Jan. 31, 2022	—	—		—	2,000,000
Total	15,442	$	191.01	15,442	2,000,000

Table of Contents

___________________

1All purchases were made pursuant to the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on February 13, 2020, under which shares were withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations.

2On October 22, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors expanded and extended the share repurchase program originally approved on October 22, 2009, under which the Company was originally authorized to purchase up to one million shares of its common stock and is now authorized to purchase up to two million shares of its common stock in open market transactions or negotiated purchases, subject to market conditions, share price and other considerations. The authorization will expire on October 22, 2023. The Company’s repurchases of vested restricted stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations of its Stock Incentive Plan participants are not made under the general repurchase plan.

3Does not include vested restricted shares that may yet be repurchased under the Stock Incentive Plan as described in Note 1.

3229

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed with this report.


Exhibit No.						Description of Exhibit
3.1						Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended on July 31, 2015.)

3.2						Bylaws of the Registrant, amended and restated as of December 30, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on January 5, ~~2021.)~~

~~10.1+~~						~~Sanderson Farms, Inc. Bonus Award Program effective November 1, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 25,~~ 2021.)

31.1*						Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*						Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1**						Section 1350 Certification.

32.2**						Section 1350 Certification.

101.INS						XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File, because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL						XBRLTaxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

104						Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

___________________

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

~~+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.~~

3330

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number						Description of Exhibit

3.1						Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended on July 31, 2015.)

3.2						Bylaws of the Registrant, amended and restated as of December 30, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 filed with the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K on January 5, ~~2021.)~~

~~10.1+~~						~~Sanderson Farms, Inc. Bonus Award Program effective November 1, 2020. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K on January 25,~~ 2021.)

31.1*						Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2*						Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1**						Section 1350 Certification.

32.2**						Section 1350 Certification.

101.INS						XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF						XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase

101.LAB						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

104						Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document).

___________________

* Filed herewith.

** Furnished herewith.

~~+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.~~

3431

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
	(Registrant)

Date: February ~~25, 2021~~24, 2022	By:	/s/ D. Michael Cockrell
		Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer

Date: February ~~25, 2021~~24, 2022	By:	/s/ Tim Rigney
		Secretary, Corporate Controller and
		Chief Accounting Officer

3532


Fiscal Year 2020	Common Stock			Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares	Amount
Balance at October 31, 2019	22,203,920	$	22,204	$	86,010	$	1,309,461	$	1,417,675
Net loss - first quarter 2020	—	—		—		(38,576)		(38,576)
Cash dividends ($0.32 per share)	—	—		—		(7,113)		(7,113)
Stock compensation plan transactions	25,292	25		(4,721)		—		(4,696)
Amortization of unearned compensation	—	—		2,082		—		2,082
Balance at January 31, 2020	22,229,212	$	22,229	$	83,371	$	1,263,772	$	1,369,372


	Three Months Ended
	January 31, 2021		January 31, 2020
	(in thousands except per share amounts)
Net income (loss)	$	9,478	$	(38,576)
Distributed and undistributed (earnings) to unvested restricted stock	(133)		0
Distributed and undistributed earnings (loss) to common shareholders—Basic	$	9,345	$	(38,576)
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic	22,010		21,935
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted	22,010		21,935
Earnings (loss) per common share—Basic	$	0.42	$	(1.76)
Earnings (loss) per common share—Diluted	$	0.42	$	(1.76)