UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 ______________________________________
 
Form 10-Q
 
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended MarchDecember 31, 2013
 
OR
 
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                 to                 
 
Commission file number 1-31614
 ______________________________________
 
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware77-0138960
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
7414721 Calle PlanoCarga
Camarillo, California 93012
(Address of principal executive offices)(zip code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 388-3700
 ______________________________________ 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
  
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x
 
As of May 2, 2013January 31, 2014, there were outstanding 37,658,09158,247,656 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value. 
 



Table of Contents

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCHDECEMBER 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   


2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

March 31,
2013
 September 30,
2012
December 31,
2013
 September 30,
2013
(in thousands, except par value)(in thousands, except par value)
ASSETS 
  
 
  
Current assets: 
  
 
  
Cash$36,914
 $23,891
$48,355
 $68,863
Accounts receivable, net8,429
 9,403
Accounts receivable11,406
 9,807
Inventory, net12,566
 12,060
12,544
 10,692
Prepaid expenses and other current assets2,964
 2,125
2,946
 1,897
Total current assets60,873
 47,479
75,251
 91,259
Property, plant and equipment, net3,126
 3,832
3,559
 3,107
Other intangible assets, net1,087
 1,175
1,169
 1,170
Other assets3,766
 4,130
3,372
 3,425
$68,852
 $56,616
$83,351
 $98,961
      
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT 
  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
  
Current liabilities: 
  
 
  
Accounts payable$6,540
 $5,726
$9,449
 $7,436
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities12,445
 12,188
11,422
 12,245
Current portion of debt, net8,006
 
31,694
 
Deferred revenue2,005
 871
2,728
 2,215
Total current liabilities28,996
 18,785
55,293
 21,896
Other long-term liabilities442
 574
374
 407
Long-term debt, net8,083
 15,852
16,163
 16,366
Compound embedded derivative
 2,899
Convertible subordinated debt, net43,440
 42,521

 44,384
Total liabilities80,961
 80,631
71,830
 83,053
Commitments and contingencies, See note 10

 



 

Stockholders’ deficit: 
  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 10,000 shares authorized; Series B Non Cumulative, Convertible, 135 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively1
 1
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 250,000 shares authorized; 37,455 and 25,812 shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively375
 258
Stockholders’ equity: 
  
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 250,000 shares authorized; 57,829 and 57,545 shares outstanding at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively578
 575
Additional paid-in-capital1,851,644
 1,829,976
1,892,642
 1,891,661
Accumulated deficit(1,864,129) (1,854,250)(1,881,699) (1,876,328)
Total stockholders’ deficit(12,109) (24,015)
Total stockholders’ equity11,521
 15,908
$68,852
 $56,616
$83,351
 $98,961
      

 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.


3


Table of Contents

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 2012 2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands, except per share data)(in thousands, except per share data)
Net revenues: 
  
       
Product revenues$24,689
 $27,195
 $48,594
 $56,137
$24,863
 $23,905
Intellectual property revenues64
 2,542
 1,886
 3,591
2,220
 1,822
Net revenues24,753
 29,737
 50,480
 59,728
27,083
 25,727
Costs and expenses: 
  
  
   
  
Cost of product revenues11,369
 10,595
 22,344
 22,758
10,676
 10,975
Engineering, research and development9,777
 9,580
 20,281
 22,005
10,679
 10,504
Selling, general and administrative7,390
 8,383
 15,360
 15,835
7,854
 7,970
Amortization of intangible assets89
 79
 186
 146
88
 97
Costs and expenses28,625
 28,637
 58,171
 60,744
29,297
 29,546
(Loss) income from operations(3,872) 1,100
 (7,691) (1,016)
Loss from operations(2,214) (3,819)
Other expense (income): 
  
  
   
  
Interest expense, net1,966
 1,924
 3,936
 3,873
1,704
 1,970
(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative
 5,280
 (803) 1,982
Gain on compound embedded derivative
 (803)
Loss on extinguishment of debt1,594
 
Other expense (income), net5
 29
 (26) 41
61
 (31)
Other expense, net1,971
 7,233
 3,107
 5,896
3,359
 1,136
Loss before income tax (benefit) expense(5,843) (6,133) (10,798) (6,912)
Income tax (benefit) expense(996) 63
 (919) 129
Loss before income tax (benefit) provision(5,573) (4,955)
Income tax (benefit) provision(202) 77
Net loss$(4,847) $(6,196) $(9,879) $(7,041)$(5,371) $(5,032)
          
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted$(0.13) $(0.25) $(0.30) $(0.28)$(0.09) $(0.18)
          
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted37,215
 25,043
 32,587
 24,776
57,610
 28,059
 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.


4


Table of Contents

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICITEQUITY
 
 Preferred Stock Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
 Accumulated Deficit 
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
(in thousands)Shares Amount Shares Amount   
Balance at September 30, 2012135
 $1
 25,812
 $258
 $1,829,976
 $(1,854,250) $(24,015)
Net loss
 
 
 
 
 (9,879) (9,879)
Compensation expense related to stock options, awards and ESPP
 
 
 
 2,149
 
 2,149
Issuance of common stock under ESPP
 
 498
 6
 857
 
 863
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs
 
 10,651
 107
 16,948
 
 17,055
Release of restricted stock units
 
 691
 7
 (7) 
 
Repurchase of restricted stock units for payroll taxes
 
 (197) (3) (375) 
 (378)
Reclassification of compound embedded derivative liability to additional paid-in-capital
 
 
 
 2,096
 
 2,096
Balance at March 31, 2013135
 $1
 37,455
 $375
 $1,851,644
 $(1,864,129) $(12,109)
  Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in-Capital
 Accumulated Deficit Total Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Stockholders' Equity
(in thousands) Shares Amount 
Balance at September 30, 2013 57,545
 $575
 $1,891,661
 $(1,876,328) $15,908
Net loss 
 
 
 (5,371) (5,371)
Compensation expense related to stock options, awards and ESPP 
 
 1,265
 
 1,265
Release of restricted stock units 418
 4
 (4) 
 
Repurchase and retirement of restricted stock units for payroll taxes (134) (1) (342) 
 (343)
Other 
 
 62
 
 62
Balance at December 31, 2013 57,829
 $578
 $1,892,642
 $(1,881,699) $11,521
           

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.


5


Table of Contents

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities: 
  
Cash flows used in operating activities: 
  
Net loss$(9,879) $(7,041)$(5,371) $(5,032)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: 
  
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: 
  
Depreciation and amortization1,327
 1,492
496
 686
Stock-based compensation2,149
 2,209
1,265
 1,143
Change in fair value of compound embedded derivative liability(803) 1,982

 (803)
Common stock issued for employee stock plans863
 868
Gain on disposal of assets(153) 659
(159) 
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net1,594
 
Amortization of debt issuance costs135
 136
54
 68
Amortization of debt discounts1,247
 1,156
512
 625
Accretion of debt premiums(83) (77)(9) (42)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:   
   
Accounts receivable974
 (742)(1,599) (198)
Inventory(506) 3,959
(1,852) (586)
Prepaids and other assets(610) 3
(1,124) (773)
Accounts payable814
 760
2,013
 1,674
Accrued expenses and other liabilities153
 (1,219)(856) (824)
Deferred revenue1,134
 (681)513
 454
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(3,238) 3,464
Net cash used in operating activities(4,523) (3,608)
      
Cash flows used in investing activities: 
  
 
  
Capital expenditures(470) (258)(884) (161)
Proceeds from the sale of capital assets156
 
Proceeds from the sale of fixed assets183
 
Payments under licensing agreements(98) (688)(87) 
Net cash used in investing activities(412) (946)(788) (161)
      
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: 
  
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
 8
Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities: 
  
Net proceeds from the sale of common stock17,055
 

 17,213
Repurchase of restricted stock units for payroll taxes(378) (626)
Repurchase of 2014 Debentures(14,606) 
Consent fee on amendment of credit agreement(308) 
Repurchase and retirement of restricted stock units for payroll taxes(343) (254)
Other(4) (6)60
 (3)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities16,673
 (624)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(15,197) 16,956
      
Net increase in cash13,023
 1,894
Net (decrease) increase in cash(20,508) 13,187
Cash at beginning of period23,891
 17,318
68,863
 23,891
Cash at end of period$36,914
 $19,212
$48,355
 $37,078
      
Supplemental cash flow information: 
  
 
  
Cash paid during the period for: 
  
 
  
Interest$2,664
 $2,660
$2,371
 $2,262
Income taxes76
 264
25
 40
Non-cash financing activities: 
  
 
  
Equity offering costs incurred but not paid$
 $112
Reclassification of compound embedded derivative liability to additional paid-in-capital$2,096
 
$
 $2,096

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MarchTHREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
AND 2012

NOTE 1-THE COMPANY AND ITS SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation (“Vitesse,” the “Company,” “us”“us,” or “we”) is a leading supplier of high-performance integrated circuits (“ICs”) that are used primarily by manufacturers of networking systems for Carrier and Enterprise networking applications. Vitesse designs, develops and markets a diverse portfolio of high-performance, low-power and cost-competitive semiconductor products for these applications.

Vitesse was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1987. Our headquarters are located at 7414721 Calle Plano,Carga, Camarillo, California, and our phone number is (805) 388-3700. Our stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the ticker symbol VTSS.

Fiscal Year

Our fiscal year is October 1 through September 30.

Basis of Presentation

The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended September 30, 20122013, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 16,5, 2013.

The consolidated financial statements included herein are unaudited. However, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position, the consolidated results of our operations and the consolidated cash flows and the changes in our stockholders’ deficit.equity. The results of operations for the three and six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or the full year.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the United States dollar; however, our foreign subsidiaries transact in local currencies. Consequently, assets and liabilities are translated into United States dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate prevailing during the period. Foreign currency transaction and translation gains and losses are included in results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and disclosures made in the accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. Management regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, warranty reserves, inventory valuation reserves, stock-based compensation, compound embedded derivative valuation, purchased intangible asset valuations and useful lives, asset retirement obligations, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results we experience may differ materially and adversely from our original estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.


7


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

Product Revenues

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, we recognize product revenuesrevenue when the following fundamental criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred; (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collection of the sales price is reasonably assured. Delivery occurs when goods are shipped and title and risk of loss transfer to the customer, in accordance with the terms specified in the arrangement with the customer. Revenue recognition is deferred where the earnings process is incomplete.

A portion of our product sales is made through distributors under agreements allowing for pricing credits and/or right of return. Our past history with these pricing credits and/or right of return provisions prevent us from being able to reasonably estimate the final price of our inventory to be sold and the amount of inventory that could be returned pursuant to these agreements. As a result, the fixed and determinable revenue recognition criterion has not been met at the time we deliver products allowing for pricing credits or right of returns. Accordingly, product revenuesrevenue from sales made through these distributors is not recognized until the distributors ship the product to their customers. We also maintain inventory, or hub arrangements, with certain customers. Pursuant to these arrangements, we deliver products to a customer or a designated third-party warehouse based upon the customer’s projected needs, but we do not recognize revenue unless and until the customer reports that it has removed our product from the warehouse and taken title and risk of loss.

From time-to-time, we may ship goods to our distributors with no pricing credits and/or no or limited right of return. Under these circumstances, at the time of shipment, product prices are fixed or determinable and the amount of future returns and pricing allowances to be granted in the future can be reasonably estimated and are accrued. Accordingly, revenues are recorded net of these estimated amounts.

Intellectual Property Revenues

We derive intellectual property revenues from the sale and licensing of our intellectual property, maintenance and support, and royalty revenue following the sale by our licensees of products incorporating the licensed technology. We enter into intellectual property licensing agreements that generally provide licensees the right to incorporate our intellectual property components in their products with terms and conditions that vary by licensee. Our intellectual property licensing agreements may include multiple elements with an intellectual property license bundled with support services. For such multiple element intellectual property licensing arrangements, we follow the guidance in ASC Topic 605-25, Multiple-Element Arrangements, to determine whether there is more than one unit of accounting.

We recognize revenue from the sale of patents when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred, and collectability is reasonably assured. All of the requirements are generally fulfilled upon execution of the patent sale arrangement.

License and contract revenues are recorded upon delivery of the technology when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, fees are fixed or determinable, delivery has occurred, and collectability is reasonably assured. The timing of delivery is dependent on, and varies with, the terms of each contract. Other than maintenance and support, there is no continuing obligation under these arrangements after delivery of the intellectual property. Deferred revenue is created when we bill a customer in accordance with a contract prior to having met the requirements for revenue recognition.

Certain of our agreements may contain support obligations. Under such agreements we provide unspecified bug fixes and technical support. No other upgrades, products, or post-contract support are provided. These arrangements may be renewable annually by the customer. Support revenue is recognized ratably over the period during which the obligation exists, typically 12 months or less.

We recognize royalty revenue in the period in which the licensee reports shipment of products incorporating our intellectual property components. Royalties are calculated on a per unit basis, as specified in our agreement with the licensee. We may, at our discretion and in accordance with our agreements, engage a third-party to perform royalty audits of our licensees. Any correction of royalties previously reported would occur when the results are resolved.

For multiple-element arrangements, we allocate revenuesrevenue to all deliverables based on their relative selling prices. In such circumstances, we use a hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for allocating revenues to deliverables: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”); (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”); and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (“ESP”). VSOE generally exists only when we sell the deliverable separately and revenue is the price actually

8


Table of Contents

charged by us for that deliverable. Generally, we are not able to determine TPE because our licensing arrangements differ from that of our peers. We have concluded that no VSOE or TPE exists because it is rare that either we or our competitors sell the deliverables on a stand-alone basis. ESPs reflect our best estimate of what the selling prices of the elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales price between the units of

8


Table of Contents

accounting will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could affect our results of operations.

In determining ESPs, we apply significant judgment as we weigh a variety of factors, based on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement. The facts and circumstances we may consider include, but are not limited to, prices charged for similar offerings, if any, our historical pricing practices as well as the nature and complexity of different technologies being licensed, geographies and the number of uses allowed for a given license.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling is presented in product revenues. Costs incurred for shipping and handling are included in cost of revenues.

Engineering, Research and Development Costs

ResearchEngineering, research and development (“R&D”) costs are expensed when incurred. R&D expenses consist primarily of compensation expenses for employees and contractors engaged in research, design and development activities. R&D expenses also include costs include payrollof mask tooling, which we fully expense in the period, electronic design automation tools, software licensing contracts, subcontracting and related costs, materials, services and design tools used in product development,fabrication, depreciation and otheramortization, and overhead costs including facilities expenses.
Intellectual property purchased from third-parties is capitalized and computer equipment costs. Manufacturing costs associated withamortized over the developmentuseful life of a new fabrication process or a new product, including mask costs, are expensed until such time as these processes or products are proven through final testing and initial acceptance by the customer.

intellectual property.
Marketing Costs

All of the costs related to marketing and advertising our products are expensed as incurred or at the time the marketing
takes place.

Stock Based Compensation

ASC Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation requires that all stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and employee stock purchase rights, be recognized in the financial statements based on their respective grant date fair values. The benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are required to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than operating cash flow, as required under previous literature. It is also required to calculate the compensation cost of full-value awards such as restricted stock based on the market value of the underlying stock at the date of the grant. We estimate the expected life of a stock award as the period of time that the award is expected to be outstanding. Expected lives are estimated in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, as amended by SAB No. 110, which provides supplemental application guidance based on the views of the SEC. We are further required to estimate the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service periods. We estimate the fair value of each award as of the date of grant using various option pricing models, primarily the Black-Scholes option pricing model whichthat was developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and that are freely transferable. The Black-Scholes model considers,models consider, among other factors, the expected life of the award and the expected volatility of our stock price. Although the Black-Scholes model meetsmodels meet the accounting guidance requirements, the fair values generated by the modelmodels may not be indicative of the actual fair values of our awards, as it doesthey do not consider other factors important to those stock-based payment awards, such as continued employment, periodic vesting requirements, and limited transferability.

We have elected to recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted after September 30, 2005 on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. The amount of compensation expense recognized through the end of each reporting period is equal to the portion of the grant-date value of the awards that have vested, or for partially vested awards, the value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest for which the requisite services have been provided.

Other Income, Net 

Other income, net, consists of interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses, and other non-operating gains and losses.


9


Table of Contents

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes pursuant to the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not “more likely than not,” we establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase or decrease this allowance in a period, we include an expense or benefit within the tax provision in the statement of operations. ASC Topic 740-10 prescribes a “more likely than not” recognition threshold and measurement analysis for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We recognize potential accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the unaudited consolidated statements of operations as income tax expense.

Net Loss per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

For periods in each year. Net loss availablewhich we report net income, the weighted average number of shares used to calculate diluted income per share is inclusive of common stockholders is computed after deducting accumulated dividends on cumulativestock equivalents from unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, shares to be issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), convertible preferred stock, 2014 Debentures and fair value adjustments relatedthe Term B Loan. Unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, and unvested shares to be issued under our ESPP, are considered to be common stock equivalents if, using the treasury stock method, they are determined to be dilutive.

Under the two-class method of determining earnings for each class of stock, we consider the dividend rights and participating rights in undistributed earnings for each class of stock. The allocation of undistributed earnings to preferred stock. Potentialshares is equal to the amount of earnings per common shares are not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive.that would be distributed on an as-converted basis.

Risks and Uncertainties

Our future results of operations involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our business or future results and cause actual results to vary materially from historical results include, but are not limited to, dependence on the highly cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry,industry; our high fixed costs,costs; declines in average selling prices,prices; decisions by our integrated deviceIC manufacturer customers to curtail outsourcing,outsourcing; our substantial indebtedness,indebtedness; our ability to fund liquidity needs,needs; our failure to maintain an effective system of internal controls,controls; product return and liability risks,risks; the absence of significant backlog in our business,business; our dependence on international operations and sales,sales; proposed changes to United States tax laws,laws; that our management information systems may prove inadequate, attractinginadequate; our ability to attract and retainingretain qualified employees,employees; difficulties consolidating and evolving our operational capabilities,capabilities; our dependence on materials and equipment suppliers,suppliers; our loss of customers,customers; adverse tax consequences,consequences; the development of new proprietary technology and the enforcement of intellectual property rights by or against us,us; the complexity of packaging and test processes competition,in our industry; competition; our need to comply with existing and future environmental regulations,regulations; and fire, flood or other calamity and continued control by existing stockholders.affecting us or others with whom we do business.

Our short-termcurrent debt is comprised of our Term A loan (“Term A Loan”), of which the total principal amount of $7.9 million is due in February 2014. Our long term debt is comprised of our Term B loan (“Term B Loan”) and our convertible subordinated debentures due October 2014 (“2014 Debentures”), of which the total principal amount of $55.8$32.8 million is due in October 2014. Our long-term debt is comprised of our senior term loans (the “Term A Loan” and “Term B Loan”, which we collectively refer to as our “Term A and B Loans”) which have a total principal amount of $17.2 million due on August 31, 2016. We currently anticipate thatintend to use our existing cash to repay our 2014 Debentures on hand and cash provided by operating activities will permit us to pay the amount due in February 2014 and a portion of the amount due in October 2014. To meet the remaining debt obligation dueor before their maturity in October 2014, which will achieve our objective of reducing our outstanding indebtedness but will also reduce our cash balances. While we have been exploring strategic alternativesbelieve that our existing sources of liquidity, along with cash expected to repayingbe generated from revenues, will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months after repayment of the 2014 Debentures, this debt,ultimately may not be the case. If we incur operating losses and have engagednegative cash flows in the services of financial advisory firms to assist us in evaluating possible strategic and financing transactions. These transactions include, among others thatfuture, we may consider from timeneed to time, an extensionfurther reduce our operating costs or obtain alternate sources of financing, or both. We may need additional capital in the maturity datefuture and other modificationmay not have access to additional sources of capital on favorable terms or at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or debt securities, such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our Term Acommon stock and B Loans, the refinancingour stockholders may experience dilution of indebtedness from the proceeds of one or more new credit facilities, and the repayment of indebtedness from sales of assets and financing transactions. We will pursue these and other potential transactions until we provide for the repayment, refinancing and/or restructuring of our indebtedness. There can be no assurance, however, that our efforts will be successful.their ownership interests.

Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash and accounts receivable. Cash consists of demand deposits maintained with several financial institutions, which often exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) limits of $250,000. We have never experienced any losses related to these balances; however, our balances are significantly in excess of insured limits.

10


Table of Contents


At MarchDecember 31, 2013, there were three direct customers and two distributors that accounted for 33% and 49%52.8% of accounts receivable, respectively.receivable. At September 30, 2012,2013, there waswere onefour distributorcustomers that accounted for 14%63.1% of accounts receivable. We believe that this concentration and the concentration of credit risk resulting from trade receivables owing from high-technology industry customers is substantially mitigated by our credit evaluation process, relatively short collection periods and maintaining an allowance for anticipated losses. We generally do not require collateral security for outstanding amounts.


10


Table of Contents

We currently purchase wafers from a limited number of vendors. Additionally, since we do not maintain manufacturing facilities, we depend upon close relationships with contract manufacturers to assemble our products. We believe there are other vendors who can provide the same quality wafers at competitive prices and other contract manufacturers that can provide comparable services at competitive prices. We anticipate the continued use of a limited number of vendors and contract manufacturers in the near future. We are also dependent upon third partiesthird-parties for our probe testing. Under our fabless business model, our long-term revenue growth is dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient external manufacturing capacity, including wafer production capacity. We believe that in addition to the vendors currently utilized by us, other vendors would be able to provide these services.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoice amount and presented net of the allowance for doubtful accounts; they do not bear interest. We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable at each balance sheet date using a combination of factors, such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, and economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. We include any accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts using the specific identification method. ShouldAfter all attempts to collect a receivable fail,have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was zero and $0.3 millionnil as of MarchDecember 31, 2013 and September 30, 20122013, respectively.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market and consist of materials, labor and overhead. Inventory costs are determined using standard costs which approximate actual costs under the first-in, first-out method. Costs include the costs of purchased finished products, sorted wafers, and outsourced assembly, testing, and internal overhead. We evaluate inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. Our evaluation considers market and economic conditions; technology changes, new product introductions, and changes in strategic business direction; and requires estimates that may include elements that are uncertain. In order to state the inventory at lower of cost or market, we maintain reserves against individual stocking units. Inventory write-downs, once established, are not reversed until the related inventories have been sold or scrapped. If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our projections, a write-down of inventory may be required, and would be reflected in cost of goodsproduct revenues sold in the period the revision is made.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ remaining estimated useful lives, ranging from three to five years for machinery and equipment, including product tooling; and the shorter of lease terms or estimated useful lives for
leasehold improvements. When property, plant and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Gains and losses from retirements and asset disposals are recorded in selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses.

We evaluate the recoverability of property, plant and equipment in accordance with ASC Topic 360, Accounting for the Property, Plant, and EquipmentEquipment. . We perform periodic reviews to determine whether facts and circumstances exist that would indicate that the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment exceeds their fair values. If facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment might not be fully recoverable, projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated remaining useful lives are compared against their respective carrying amounts. In the event that the projected undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values. All long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair market value, less expected selling costs.


11


Table of Contents

Intangible Assets

Our intangible assets consist primarily of technology licensing agreements with third-parties. We account for intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and OthersOther. . We evaluate our long-livedfinite-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an intangible asset or asset group may not be recoverable. The carrying value of an intangible asset or asset group is not recoverable if the amounts of undiscounted future cash flows the assets are expected to generate (including any net proceeds expected from the disposal of the asset) are less than its carrying value. When we identify that impairment has occurred, we reduce the carrying value of the asset to its comparable market value (if available and appropriate) or to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach. Currently, we do not have goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets.


11


Table of Contents

Fair Value

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 emphasizes that a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 established the following fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs):

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

Level 2: Other inputs observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborate inputs; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which requires the owner of the assets or liabilities to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price these assets or liabilities. As of March 31, 2013, we did not have any Level 3 recurring fair value measurements.

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.

Financial Instruments

ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. Our financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. These financial instruments are stated at their carrying values, which are estimates of their fair values because of their nearness to cash settlement or the comparability of their terms to the terms we could obtain, for similar instruments, in the current market. Our debt instruments are included in current and long-term debt, net, and convertible subordinated debt, net on our unaudited consolidated balance sheets.

Senior Term A Loan

At its inception, the fair value of the Term A Loan was computed using a cash flow analysis in which the periodic cash coupon payments and the principal payment at maturity were discounted to the valuation date using an appropriate market discount rate. The discount rate was determined by analyzing the seniority and securitization of the instrument, our financial condition, and observing the quoted bond yields in the fixed income market as of the valuation date. The valuation was determined using Level 3 inputs.

Senior Term B Loan

At its inception, the fair value of the Term B Loan was computed using a binomial lattice model. The valuation was determined using Level 3 inputs. The valuation model combined expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions regarding risk-adjusted yields, stock price volatility, recent price quotes, and trading information of our common stock into which the Term B Loan is convertible.


12


Table of Contents

Convertible Subordinated Debt

TheWe use a binomial-lattice model to estimate the fair value of our 2014 Debentures. At inception, the 2014 Debentures required bifurcation and accounting at fair value because the economic and contractual characteristics of the compound embedded derivative met the criteria for bifurcation and separate accounting due to the conversion price not being indexed to our own stock. The compound embedded derivative was comprised of the conversion option and a make-whole payment for foregone interest if the holder converted the debenture early. The make-whole payment for foregone interest expired October 30, 2012, and upon its expiration, the compound embedded derivative no longer met the criteria for bifurcation as all components of the conversion feature were indexed to our own stock. A final valuation was completed on October 30, 2012. We recorded a gain of $0.8 million into earnings due to the changeAs more fully described in value and reclassified the final liability value of $2.1 million, from other long-term liabilities, to equity.


12


Table of Contents

At its inception, the approximate fair value of the compound embedded derivative included in our 2014 Debentures was computed as the difference between the estimated value ofNote 4, the 2014 Debentures withno longer require bifurcation and without the compound embedded derivative features. The fair value of the 2014 Debentures was estimated using a convertible bondfinal valuation model within a lattice framework. These valuations were determined using Level 3 inputs. The valuation model combines expected cash outflows with market-based assumptions regarding risk-adjusted yields, stock price volatility, recent price quotes, and trading information of our common stock into which the 2014 Debentures are convertible. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

The compound embedded derivative was presented on the balance sheet at fair value and was marked-to-market, until the make-whole payment for foregone interest expired on October 30, 2012. The change in the fair value of the compound embedded derivative was a non-cash item primarily related to the changecompleted in price of the underlying common stock and is reflected in earnings. As we intended to, and had the ability to, satisfy the obligations with equity securities, in accordance with ASC Topic 470, Debt, we classified the liability as a long-term liability on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 30,October 2012.

The valuation methodologies we use as described above require considerable judgment and may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

Warranty

We generally warrant our products against defects for one year from date of shipment. A warranty reserve is recorded against revenuesrevenue when products are shipped. At each reporting period, we adjust our reserve for warranty claims based on our actual warranty claims experience as a percentage of net revenuesrevenue for the preceding 12 months and also consider the effect of known operational issues that may have an impact that differs from historical trends. Historically, our warranty returns have not
been material.

Contingencies

We assess our exposure to loss contingencies, including environmental, legal and income tax matters, and provide an accrual for exposure if it is judged to be probable and reasonably estimable. If the actual loss from a loss contingency differs from management’s estimates, results of operations could be adjusted upward or downward.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012,2013, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02,2013-11, Intangibles-Goodwill and OtherIncome Taxes (Topic 350)-Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“740): Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, A Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (A Consensus the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2012-02”),2013-11 provides guidance on financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The FASB’s objective in issuing this ASU is to establish an optional two-step analysis for impairment testingeliminate diversity in practice resulting from a lack of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. The standards updateguidance on this topic in current U.S. GAAP. This ASU applies to all entities with unrecognized tax benefits that also have tax loss or tax credit carryforwards in the same tax jurisdiction as of the reporting date. This amendment is effective for financial statements of periodspublic entities for fiscal years beginning after SeptemberDecember 15, 2012, with early2013, and interim periods within those years. We do not expect the adoption permitted. The implementation of the new guidance did notthis standard to have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.position and results of operations.




13


Table of Contents


NOTE 2-COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

In accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share, basic
For the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded a net income and lossloss. As such, all outstanding potential common shares were excluded from the diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

For periods in which we report net income, the weighted average number of shares used to calculate diluted income per share is inclusive of common stock equivalents from unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, shares to be issued under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), convertible preferred stock, 2014 Debentures and the Term B Loan. Unexercised stock options, restricted stock units, and unvested shares to be issued under our ESPP, are considered to be common stock equivalents if, using the treasury stock method, they are determined to be dilutive.

Under the two-class method of determining earnings for each class of stock, we consider the dividend rights and participating rights in undistributed earnings for each class of stock. The allocation of undistributed earnings to preferred shares is equal to the amount of earnings per common share that would be distributed on an as-converted basis.

computation.
The following potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the computation of net loss per share.
Three and Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Outstanding stock options2,130
 1,847
3,038
 1,724
Outstanding restricted stock units2,388
 1,743
3,034
 1,228
ESPP shares518
 327
365
 506
Convertible preferred stock674
 674

 674
2014 Debentures10,332
 10,332
7,298
 10,332
Term B Loan1,887
 1,887
1,887
 1,887
Total potential common stock excluded from calculation17,929
 16,810
15,622
 16,351


NOTE 3-INVENTORY, NET
March 31,
2013
 September 30,
2012
December 31,
2013
 September 30,
2013
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Inventory: 
  
Inventory, net: 
  
Raw materials$1,268

$1,394
$1,307

$1,220
Work-in-process4,326
 5,359
5,054
 3,652
Finished goods6,972
 5,307
6,183
 5,820
Total$12,566
 $12,060
$12,544
 $10,692


NOTE 4-DEBT 
 March 31,
2013
 September 30,
2012
 (in thousands)
Term A Loan, 10.5% fixed-rate notes, due February 2014$8,006
 $8,090
Term B Loan, convertible, 8.0% fixed-rate notes, due October 20148,083
 7,755
Other
 7
2014 Debentures, convertible, 8.0% fixed-rate notes, due October 201443,440
 42,521
Total debt, net59,529
 58,373
Less current portion of debt, net(8,006) 
Long-term debt, less current portion, net$51,523
 $58,373
 December 31,
2013
 September 30,
2013
 (in thousands)
Term A Loan, bearing interest at 9.0% and 10.5% as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, due August 2016$7,768
 $7,919
Term B Loan, convertible, bearing interest at 9.0% and 8.0% as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013, respectively, due August 20168,394
 8,444
Other1
 3
Long-term debt, net16,163
 16,366
2014 Debentures, convertible, 8.0% fixed-rate notes, due October 201431,694
 44,384
Total debt, net$47,857
 $60,750


14


Table of Contents

Additional information about our debt is as follows:
Term A Loan Term B Loan 2014 DebenturesTerm A Loan Term B Loan 2014 Debentures
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Principal$7,857
 $9,342
 $46,493
$7,857
 $9,342
 $32,843
Unaccreted debt premium/(unamortized) debt discount149
 (1,259) (3,053)
Unamortized debt discount(89) (948) (1,149)
Carrying value$8,006
 $8,083
 $43,440
$7,768
 $8,394
 $31,694
          
Interest payable termsQuarterly, in arrears
 Quarterly, in arrears
 Semi-annually, in arrearsQuarterly, in arrears
 Quarterly, in arrears
 Semi-annually, in arrears
Annual effective interest rate8.2% 17.7% 12.2%9.5% 13.7% 12.2%
Conversion rate per common sharen/a
 $4.95
 $4.50
n/a
 $4.95
 $4.50


Prepayments on theThe Term B Loan are permitted at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest if the closing price of our common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price in effect for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the day prior to the date of notice of prepayment. The conversion terms are substantially similar to the conversion terms of the 2014 Debentures.Debentures, as described below. At MarchDecember 31, 2013, conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the Term B Loan would result in the issuance of 1.9 million shares of common stock. We can elect to settle any conversion in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash.

The Term A Loan and Term B Loan (collectively, “Term A and B Loans”)Loans are collateralized by substantially all of our assets.

Prepayment of the 2014 Debentures is permitted at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest if the closing price of our common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price in effect for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the day prior to the date of notice of prepayment. At MarchDecember 31, 2013, conversion of the outstanding principal amount of the 2014 Debentures would result in the issuance of 10.37.3 million shares of common stock.
We can elect to settle any conversion in stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash. The compound embedded derivative, which expired October 30, 2012, was comprised of the conversion option and a make-whole payment for foregone interest if the holder converted the debenture early. Upon expiration offof the make-whole payment for forgone interest, the compound embedded derivative no longer met the criteria for bifurcation as all components of the conversion feature were indexed to our own stock.

A final valuation was completed on October 30, 2012. We recorded a gain of $0.8 million into earnings due to the change in value and reclassified the final liability value of $2.1 million, from other long-term liabilities, to equity. The 2014 Debentures are collateralized by a second priority interest in substantially all of our assets.

The credit agreements for the Term A and B Loans and 2014 Debentures provide for customary restrictions and limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness and liens on property, make restricted payments or investments, enter into mergers or consolidations, conduct asset sales, pay dividends or distributions and enter into specified transactions and activities, and also contain other customary default provisions. The agreements provide that we must repurchase, at the option of the holders, indebtedness at its principal amounts plus accrued and unpaid interest upon the occurrence of a fundamental change involving us, as described in the agreements. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change involving us, the holders of the 2014 Debentures and the Term B Loan may be entitled to receive a “make-whole premium” if they convert their 2014 Debentures or Term B Loan into common stock, payable in additional shares of common stock, if the trading price of our common stock is between $3.20 and $166 per share. Upon the occurrence of certain change in control events, the holders of the Term A and B Loans may require us to redeem all or a portion of the loans at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 31, 2013.

On November 5, 2013, we amended the credit agreement for the Term A and B Loans (the “Amendment”). The Amendment extends the maturity dates of our outstanding Term A Loan and Term B Loan from February 4, 2014 and October 30, 2014, respectively, to August 31, 2016, and also provides that the Term A and B Loans will each bear interest in cash at 9.0% per annum payable quarterly in arrears. The Amendment provides us with a right to optionally prepay the Term A and B Loans in whole or in part, at any time and from time-to-time, subject to the payment of a prepayment fee. The prepayment fee is 5% of the aggregate principal amount repaid for prepayments made prior to October 30, 2014, 3% for prepayments made on or after October 30, 2014 but prior to October 30, 2015, and 2% for prepayment made on or after October 30, 2015. The credit agreement for the Term A and B Loans continue to require that we prepay the Term A and B Loans upon the occurrence of certain prepayment events, but the Amendment provides us with greater flexibility to sell assets and use the resulting proceeds for purposes other than repaying the Term A and B Loans after repayment of our 2014 Debentures.

15


Table of Contents

The Amendment provides us with the right, so long as no event of default exists under the credit agreement for the Term A and B Loans, to purchase, repay, redeem, or defease any or all of the 2014 Debentures. In addition, the Amendment requires us to maintain an unrestricted cash balance of $8.0 million and achieve minimum quarterly revenues of $10.0 million.
The credit agreement for the Term A and B Loans continues to provide the lenders with the right to convert the Term B Loan into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $4.95 per share through October 30, 2014. After that date, the lenders will not have the right to convert the Term B Loan into common stock.
In connection with the Amendment, we paid the lenders a consent fee of $0.3 million which was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the remaining term of the Term A and B Loans. Additionally, in connection with the Amendment we repurchased $13.7 million principal amount of our 2014 Debentures at 107% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest, which eliminated the potential issuance of approximately 3.0 million dilutive common shares. After this transaction, $32.8 million principal amount of 2014 Debentures remain outstanding. We recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt in the amount of $1.6 million related to the repurchase of the 2014 Debentures.

Debt Maturities

Maturity of our total aggregated outstanding debt is as follows:
Fiscal year (in thousands)
Fiscal Year (in thousands)
2014 $7,857
 $
2015 55,835
 32,843
2016 17,199
Total $63,692
��$50,042


15


Table of Contents

Except for required repurchases upon a change in control or in the event of certain asset sales, as described in the applicable credit agreements, we are not required to make any sinking fund or redemption payments with respect to this debt.


NOTE 5-FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITY

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the compound embedded derivative measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Beginning balance September 30$2,899
 $7,796
Transfer to equity(2,096) 
Total net gains included in earnings(803) 1,982
Ending balance March 31$
 $9,778

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 fair value measurements during the six months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
 2014 2013
 (in thousands)
Beginning balance September 30$
 $2,899
Transfer to equity
 (2,096)
Total net gains included in earnings
 (803)
Ending balance December 31$
 $

The compound embedded derivative liability, which was included in long-term liabilities, represented the value of the equity conversion feature and a “make-whole” feature of the 2014 Debentures. The make-whole payment for foregone interest expired October 30, 2012, and upon its expiration, the compound embedded derivative no longer met the criteria for bifurcation as all components of the derivative were indexed to our own stock.

We measure the fair value of our Term A and B Loans and 2014 Debentures (“long-term debt”) carried at amortized/accreted cost quarterly for disclosure purposes.

We use a binomial-lattice model to estimate fair values of our Term B Loan and 2014 Debenture financial instruments. The key unobservable input utilized in the model for our Term B Loan and 2014 Debentures includes a discount rate of 85.9%.% The estimated fair value of our Term A Loan is determined using Level 3 inputs based primarily on the comparability of its terms to the terms we could obtain, for similar instruments, in the current market.

The estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:

16


Table of Contents

March 31, 2013 September 30, 2012December 31, 2013 September 30, 2013
Carrying value Fair value Carrying value Fair valueCarrying value Fair value Carrying value Fair value
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Term A Loan$8,006
 $8,311
 $8,090
 $8,437
$7,768
 $8,531
 $7,919
 $8,165
Term B Loan8,083
 9,680
 7,755
 9,776
8,394
 10,350
 8,444
 9,781
2014 Debentures43,440
 48,317
 42,521
 46,725
31,694
 34,691
 44,384
 49,282


NOTE 6-STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Authorized Capital Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 250 million shares of common stock, par value $0.01, per share, of which 19.5 million shares are reserved for future potential issuance upon conversion of debt, 9.59.0 million shares areof common stock have been reserved for issuance under our stock compensation plans, and 1.20.8 million remaining shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under our ESPP, and 0.8 million shares are reserved for issuance upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock.ESPP.

We are authorized to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share of which 0.8 million shares have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock. As of March 31, 2013, thereand none were 134,720 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding that were convertible into common stock on a five-to-one basis, for an aggregate of 673,600 shares of common stock. The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends in respect of our common stock, dividends in an amount equal to 10 percent of par value per share plus the amount of dividends that would have been payable with respect to the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion had such shares of Series B Preferred Stock been fully converted.outstanding.


16


Table of Contents

In December 2012, we raised $17.1 million, net of offering costs of $1.51.6 million, from the registered public sale of 10,651,280 shares of common stock at $1.75 per share, based onwhich was a negotiated discount to market.the market price of our common stock.

In June 2013, we raised an additional $37.4 million, net of offering expenses of $2.8 million, from the registered public sale of 18,720,000 shares of common stock at $2.15 per share, which was a discount to the market price of our common stock.

NOTE 7-STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Stock Options

We have in effect one stock-basedstock incentive plan, the 2013 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) under which non-qualified stock options and restricted stock units have been granted to employees and non-employee directors. The optionsOptions generally vest over four years and expire 10 years from the date of grant.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the stock based compensation grants. The exercise price of options is the closing price on the date the options are granted. The fair value of each option grant is generally estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Under the stock option plans,Plan, we have 4.31.6 million shares available for future grant as of MarchDecember 31, 2013. The 2013 Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, performance awards, restricted stock and stock units, and other stock and cash-based awards. The Plan uses a “fungible share” concept, pursuant to which shares that are subject to appreciation awards (such as stock options and stock appreciation rights) are counted against the Plan share limit on a 1-for-1 basis for every such share subject to appreciation awards, and shares that are subject to full value awards (such as awards of stock, restricted stock and restricted stock units) are counted against the Plan share limit at a ratio of 1.5 shares for every share subject to the full value award.

As of MarchDecember 31, 2013, none of our stock-based awards are classified as liabilities. We did not capitalize any stock-based compensation cost.


17


Table of Contents

Compensation cost related to our stock-based compensation planPlan and ESPP is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 2012 2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Cost of revenues$144
 $146
 $298
 $268
$184
 $154
Engineering, research and development379
 388
 765
 764
485
 386
Selling, general and administrative483
 612
 1,086
 1,177
596
 603
Total stock-based compensation expense$1,006
 $1,146
 $2,149
 $2,209
$1,265
 $1,143

As of MarchDecember 31, 2013, there was $7.49.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units and our ESPP. The weighted average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation for stock options and restricted stock units expected to be recognized is approximately 2.21.9 years and 2.4 years, respectively. An estimated forfeiture rate of 5.2% has been appliedFuture stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock-based compensation will increase to all unvested optionsthe extent that we grant additional equity awards and restrictedour stock outstanding as of March 31, 2013.price increases.

Activity in stock option awards is as follows:
Shares   (in thousands) 
Weighted average
exercise price
 
Weighted average
remaining
contractual life  (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic value (in thousands)
Shares   (in thousands) 
Weighted average
exercise price
 
Weighted average
remaining
contractual life  (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic value (in thousands)
Options outstanding, September 30, 20121,813
 $16.57
 6.61
 $2
Options outstanding, September 30, 20132,089
 $13.43
 6.67 $591
Granted429
 2.10
 
 
1,014
 2.53
 
 

Exercised
 
 
 

 
 
 

Cancelled or expired(112) 15.47
 
 
(65) 112.84
 
 

Options outstanding, March 31, 20132,130
 13.72
 7.04
 26
Options exercisable, March 31, 20131,201
 $21.98
 5.63
 $
Options outstanding, December 31, 20133,038
 7.64
 7.73 886
Options exercisable, December 31 20131,377
 $13.56
 5.86 $177
 
This intrinsic value represents the excess of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price of such options. The aggregate intrinsic values in the preceding table for the options outstanding represent the total pretax intrinsic value, based on our closing stock price of $2.162.92, as of MarchDecember 31, 2013, which would have been received by the option holders had those option holders exercised their in-the-money options as of those dates. There were 0.4 million in-the-money stock options that were exercisable as of December 31, 2013.


17


Table of Contents

TheExpected volatility used to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model; however, the value calculated using an option pricing model may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction, or actually realized by the employee upon exercise. Expected volatilityoptions granted is based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury constant maturity rate for the expected life of the stock option. The expected life of a stock award is the period of time that the award is expected to be outstanding. Expected lives are estimated in accordance with SAB No. 107, as amended by SAB No. 110, which provides supplemental application guidance based on the views of the SEC.

The per share fair values of time-based stock options granted in connection with stock incentive plans have been estimated using the following weighted average assumptions:
Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 20122013 2012
Expected life (in years)5.63 5.635.79 6.08
Expected volatility: 
Weighted-average82.1% 87.0%
Range80.5% - 82.1% 86.1% - 87.1%
Expected volatility81.5% 80.5%
Expected dividend  
Risk-free interest rate.9% - 1.0% 1.1% - 1.3%1.7% 0.9%

The weighted average fair value at the date of grant of time-based options granted in the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1.431.75 and $1.801.47, respectively.
On December 10, 2013, we granted 500,000 market-based stock options at an exercise price of $2.53 to executive officers. The market-based options vest if either of the following conditions is met prior to December 10, 2018: (i) the closing price of our Common Stock equals or exceeds twice the exercise price of $2.53 for 30 consecutive trading days; or (ii) a change in control

18


Table of Contents

occurs where the Company’s stockholders receive in consideration of their shares of Common Stock cash or other consideration with a value at least equal to twice the exercise price of $2.53. We evaluate stock awards with market conditions as to the probability that the market conditions will be met and estimates the date at which the market conditions will be met in order to properly recognize stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period. We used the following assumptions to estimate the fair value of the options: expected life of 1.3 years, expected volatility of 80.0%, a zero dividend rate, and a risk-free rate of 2.79%. The market-based options had a grant date per share fair value of $1.86.

The following table provides additional information in regards to options outstanding as of MarchDecember 31, 2013:
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price Number Outstanding (in thousands) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years) Weighted Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable (in thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price
$2.10 - $2.10 427
 9.93 $2.10
 
 $
2.26 - 4.10 427
 8.51 2.69
 217
 2.76
4.36 - 5.20 768
 7.19 4.80
 487
 4.88
5.40 - 63.60 440
 3.50 35.44
 429
 36.18
66.40 - 174.80 68
 0.73 115.58
 68
 115.58
$2.10 - $174.80 2,130
 7.04 $13.72
 1,201
 $21.98
  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price Number Outstanding (in thousands) Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years) Weighted Average Exercise Price Number Exercisable (in thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price
$2.10 - $2.26 453
 9.17 $2.11
 105
 $2.11
2.53 995
 9.94 2.53
 
 
2.54 - 4.36 775
 7.53 3.44
 563
 3.48
4.60 - 48.00 621
 5.44 9.16
 515
 9.98
48.40 - 145.40 194
 1.09 58.61
 194
 58.61
$2.10 - $145.40 3,038
 7.73 $7.64
 1,377
 $13.56

Restricted Stock Units

We grant restricted stock units to certain employees and to our employee and non-employee directors. Grants vest over varying terms, to a maximum of four years from the date of the grant. Awards to non-employee directors upon their initial appointment or election to the board vest in installments of 33.3% each over the first three anniversaries of the grant date, and annual awards to non-employee directors vest 100% on the first anniversary of the grant date. Unvested restricted shares are forfeited if the recipient’s employment terminates for any reason other than death, disability, or special circumstances as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.


18


Table of Contents

Activity for our restricted stock award units is as follows:
Restricted
Stock Units (in thousands)
 
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value per Share
Restricted
Stock Units (in thousands)
 
Weighted Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value per Share
 Weighted average
remaining
contractual life (in
years)
 Aggregate
intrinsic value (in thousands)
Restricted stock units, September 30, 20121,686
 $3.49
Restricted stock units, September 30, 20132,021
 $2.65
 1.13 $6,143
Awarded1,472
 2.11
1,441
 2.54
  
Released(690) 3.61
(418) 3.30
  
Forfeited(80) 3.22
(10) 2.43
  
Restricted stock units, March 31, 20132,388
 $2.61
Restricted stock units, December 31, 20133,034
 $2.51
 1.30 $8,860

We issue restricted stock units as part of our equity incentive plans. For the majority of restricted stock units granted, the number of shares issued on the date the restricted stock units vest is net of the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees. The impact of such withholding totaled $0.4$0.3 million for each of the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, and 2012, and was recorded as settlement on restricted stock tax withholding in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of stockholders’ deficit.equity. Although shares withheld are not issued, they are treated as common stock repurchases in our unaudited consolidated financial statements, as they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In January 2011,Pursuant to our stockholders approvedESPP, eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 15% of their regular base salary subject to certain limits to purchase shares at the ESPP under which 2.5 million shareslower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock were reserved for issuance.on the date of the commencement of the offering or on the last day of the 6-month offering period. As of MarchDecember 31, 2013, the ESPP had 1.20.8 million shares availableof our common stock reserved for issuance. future issuance under the plan. On January 31, 2014, 0.4 million shares were issued at a price per share of $2.46, a 15% discount to the share price on August 1, 2013, the commencement date for the

19


Table of Contents

purchase period that ended January 31, 2014. We recognized $0.2 million and $0.1 million of stock compensation expense under the ESPP during the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We determine the fair value of the ESPP awards using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Underlying assumptions used were as follows:
  Three Months Ended December 31,
  2013 2012
Expected life (in years) 0.5 0.5
Expected volatility 50.3% 47.6%
Expected dividend  
Risk-free interest rate 0.08% 0.14%

As of MarchDecember 31, 2013, approximately 49%36.0% of the eligible employees participated in our stock purchase plan. On January 31, 2013, 0.5 million shares were issued at a price per share of $1.73, a 15% discount to the share price on that date, for the purchase period that began on August 1, 2012 and ended January 31, 2013. A new purchase period began on February 1, 2013 and ends July 31, 2013.

The fair value of the ESPP awards are calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 718-50, Employee Share Purchase Plans, under which the fair value of each share granted under the ESPP is equal to the sum of 15% of a share of stock, a call option for 85% of a share of stock and a put option for 15% of a share of stock. The fair value of the call and put options are determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. We used the following range of assumptions for both purchase periods: expected useful life of 0.5 years, weighted average expected volatility of 40.4% to 49.8%, a zero dividend rate, and a risk-free interest rate of 0.1% to 0.2%. We recognized approximately $0.3 million in ESPP stock compensation for both the six months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.


NOTE 8-INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxestax (benefit) provision as a percentage of loss from operations before income taxes was 8.5%(3.6)% for the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013 compared to (1.9)%1.6% for the comparable period in the prior year. Our effectiveincome tax ratebenefit is primarily impacted bycertain foreign taxes, certain nondeductible interest and share based expenses,expenses. The income tax benefit is also impacted by the release of a portion of the valuation allowance related to certain foreign jurisdictions' deferred tax assets as such balances were more likely than not realizable within the applicable carryforward period based on our analysis of the available positive and for the six months ended March 31, 2013, by a refund of withholding taxes previously paid on certain foreign income.negative evidence.

At MarchDecember 31, 2013, we had approximately $90.241.5 million, $32.7 million, and $133.4 million of Federalfederal, state, and foreign Net Operating Losses (“NOLs”), respectively, that can be used in future tax years. In December 2012,, we issued 10.7 million shares of common stock in a public offering which is believed to have resulted in a Section 382 ownership change. In general, a Section 382 ownership change occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5%” shareholders (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. An ownership change generally affects the rate at which NOLs and potentially other deferred tax assets are permitted to offset future taxable income. Of our federal NOL amount as of December 31, 2013, $28.1 million is subject to an annual Section 382 limitation of $1.4 million due to the December 2012 ownership change. Since we maintain a full valuation allowance on all of our U.S. and state deferred tax assets, the impact of the ownership change on the future realizability of our U.S. and state deferred tax assets did not result in an impact to our provision for income taxes for the sixthree months ended March ended December 31, 2013, or on our net deferred tax asset as of MarchDecember 31, 2013. 2013.

In addition, as a result of this ownership change, substantially all of our federal NOLs, credits and certain built-in deductions or losses are subject toJune 2013, we issued an annual limitation ofadditional $1.418.7 million. Consequently, it is anticipated that shares of common stock in a substantial portionpublic offering. We are in the process of evaluating whether the federal NOLs, credits and built-in losses will expire unutilized asoffering caused a result of this limitation.Section 382 ownership change. If an additional ownership change shoulddid occur or does occur in the future, our ability to utilize our NOL carryforwards and other deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be further limited and the value and recoverability of our NOLs and other deferred tax assets could be further diminished.
 
NOTE 9-SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

19


Table of Contents


We manage and operate our business through one operating segment.

Net revenues from customers that were equal to or greater than 10% of total net revenues are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,
2013 2012 2013 2012Three Months Ended December 31,



 

 

 

2013 2012
WPG Holdings**16.7% 14.0% 14.9% 12.2%18.4% 13.2%
Nu Horizons Electronics**11.1% 10.3% 11.7% 16.2%*
 12.3%
Harris Corporation*
 10.8% *
 *
Huawei*
 11.0%
 __________________________________________________
*Less than 10% of total net revenues for period indicated.
**Distributor

20


Table of Contents


Net revenues by geographic area are as follows:
 Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,
 2013 2012 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
United States$7,198
 $13,279
 $18,103
 $22,998
Asia Pacific14,037
 12,823
 26,101
 27,952
EMEA*3,518
 3,635
 6,276
 8,778
Total net revenues$24,753
 $29,737
 $50,480
 $59,728

*Europe, Middle East and Africa
 Three Months Ended December 31,
 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
United States$6,559
 $10,905
Asia Pacific16,786
 12,064
Europe, Middle East and Africa3,738
 2,758
Total net revenues$27,083
 $25,727

Revenues by geographic area are based upon the country of billing. The geographic location of distributors and third-party manufacturing service providers may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users.

We believe a substantial portion of the products billed to original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia Pacific region are ultimately shipped to end-markets in the United States and Europe.

We also classify our product revenues based on our three product lines: (i) Connectivity; (ii) Ethernet switching; and (iii) Transport processing. Product revenues by product line are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 2012 2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Connectivity$9,835
 $14,704
 $19,973
 27,672
$8,949
 10,138
Ethernet switching10,331
 6,777
 18,637
 14,800
11,336
 8,306
Transport processing4,523
 5,714
 9,984
 13,665
4,578
 5,461
Product revenues$24,689
 $27,195
 $48,594
 $56,137
$24,863
 $23,905


NOTE 10-COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases and Software Licenses
We lease facilities under non-cancellable operating leases. The leases expire at various dates through fiscal year 2016 and frequently include renewal provisions for varying periods of time, provisions which require us to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or provisions for minimum rent increases. Minimum leases payments, including scheduled rent increases are recognized as rent expenses on a straight line basis over the applicable lease term. Lease incentives received are recognized as a reduction of rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Software license commitments represent non-cancellable licenses of intellectual property from third‑parties used in the development of our products.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases that have remaining non-cancellable lease terms in excess of one year and software licenses are as follows:
 Remaining in 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total
 (in thousands)
Operating leases$1,639
 $1,568
 $343
 $
 $
 $
 $3,550
Software licenses5,346
 6,736
 2,847
 2,800
 2,800
 
 20,529
Total$6,985
 $8,304
 $3,190
 $2,800
 $2,800
 $
 $24,079

21


Table of Contents


From time-to-time, we are involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including actions against us which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines and penalties in substantial amounts. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined, we believe that as of December 31, 2013, the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. Related legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.

During our normal course of business, we make certain contractual guarantees and indemnities pursuant to which we may be required to make future payments under specific circumstances. We review our exposure under these agreements no less than annually, or more frequently when events indicate. Except for our established warranty reserves, we do not expect that any potential payments in connection with any of these indemnity obligations would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position. Accordingly, except for established warranty reserves, we have not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of MarchDecember 31, 2013 and September 30, 20122013.


20


Table of Contents

Patents and Licenses

We have entered into various licensing agreements requiring primarily fixed fee royalty payments. Certain of these agreements contain provisions for the payment of guaranteed or minimum royalty amounts. In the event that we fail to pay any minimum annual royalties, these licenses may automatically be terminated.

Warranties

We establish reserves for future product warranty costs that are expected to be incurred pursuant to specific warranty provisions with our customers. Our warranty reserves are established at the time of sale and updated throughout the warranty period based upon numerous factors including historical warranty return rates and expenses over various warranty periods.

Intellectual Property Indemnities

We indemnify certain customers and our contract manufacturers against liability arising from third-party claims of intellectual property rights infringement related to our products. These indemnities appear in development and supply agreements with our customers as well as manufacturing service agreements with our contract manufacturers, are not limited in amount or duration and generally survive the expiration of the contract. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until an infringement claim has been made, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur related to such indemnifications.

Director and Officer Indemnities and Contractual Guarantees

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executives, which require us to indemnify such individuals to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Our indemnification obligations under such agreements are not limited in amount or duration. Certain costs incurred in connection with such indemnifications may be recovered under certain circumstances under various insurance policies. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur relating to such indemnities.

We have also entered into severance and change-of-control agreements with certain of our executives. These agreements provide for the payment of specific compensation benefits to such executives upon the termination of their employment
with us.

General Contractual Indemnities/Product Liability 
During the normal course of business, we enter into contracts with customers where we agreed to indemnify the other party for personal injury or property damage caused by our products. Our indemnification obligations under such agreements are not generally limited in amount or duration. Given that the amount of any potential liabilities related to such indemnities cannot be determined until a lawsuit has been filed, we are unable to determine the maximum amount of losses that we could incur relating to such indemnities. Historically, any amounts payable pursuant to such indemnities have not had a material negative effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We maintain general and product liability insurance which may provide a source of recovery to us in the event of an indemnification claim.


2122


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Report. The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Report, as well as in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 20122013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
(“ (“Annual Report”) and in our other filings with the SEC, which discuss our business in greater detail.
 
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statements that do not directly relate to historical or current fact. We use words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” “may,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “becoming,” “transitioning,” and similar expressions to identify such forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements include statements as to our business outlook, revenues, margins, expenses, tax provision, capital resources sufficiency, capital expenditures, interest income, cash commitments, and expenses. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those referenced in the subsection entitled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this Report and Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report, and similar discussions in our other SEC filings. We assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

Overview

We are a leading supplier of high-performance ICs that are used primarily by manufacturers of networking systems for Carrier and Enterprise networking applications. We design, develop and market a diverse portfolio of high-performance, low-power and cost-competitive networking and connectivity IC solutions. For more than 2530 years, we have been a leader in the adoption of new technologies in Carrier and Enterprise networking.
Carrier and Enterprise networks have experienced a dramatic increase in bothBoth bandwidth demands and complexity, driven by the introduction of new content-rich services, the convergence of voice, video and data, and enhanced 4G/LTE mobile networks.networks, have risen dramatically in Carrier and Enterprise networks . Media-rich devices, such as smartphones and game consoles, require increased bandwidth. New Enterprise deployment options, such as cloud based servers,Cloud-based services and social media and tele-presence havetelepresence, also spur demand. More recently, there is a trend for increased demand.Ethernet deployment within networks used in Industrial and Military networking, automotive transport, and future Smart Grid applications, collectively referred to as the Internet of Things (“IoT”).
These trends have forcedAs a significant transitionresult, Carrier, Enterprise, and consolidation of both Carrier and Enterpriseincreasingly, IoT networks are transitioning to all-IP and packet-based Ethernet networks that can scale in terms of services, bandwidth and capability, while lowering power consumption and acquisition and operations costs. These networks are based on technology that is significantly more sophisticated, service-aware, secure and reliable than traditional Enterprise-grade Ethernet Local Area Network (“LAN”)LAN technology. Such networks are built on new technology that is often referred to as “Carrier Ethernet” in Carrier networks and “Converged Enhanced Ethernet” in Enterprise networks.


Realization of Our Transition Strategy

Several years ago, we embarked on the strategic mission of re-inventing Vitesse to take advantage of the dramatic ongoing transformation of our target networking markets. Our objective is to be the leading supplier of high-performance ICs for the global communications infrastructure markets. Thus,In an effort to diversify ourselves and provide new opportunities for growth, we re-positioned our R&D teams and invested heavily to enter new markets, develop new products, and obtainpenetrate new customerscustomers. Over the last three years we have seen consistent growth in an effortthis new product portfolio, which reached 33% of our total product revenues by the end of fiscal 2013.
To continue to diversify ourselves and providegrow our new product revenue, we must win market share in high-growth communications market segments. In 2013, we expanded our market focus to include elements of the IoT market, which provides substantial new growth opportunities for growth.the company.

23


In order toTable of Contents

We believe we have effectively and efficiently targeted these high-growth infrastructure markets with substantial R&D investments over the last five years. To optimize the efficiency of our R&D teamefficiency, we chose to serve two large, growing, independent markets which rely increasingly on Ethernet technology: Carrier networking and Enterprise networking. We estimatenetworks. As we are now three years into the deployment of these new products, we can see that our total addressable market to have a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 17%target markets and to approach $2.1 billion by 2016. The Carrier networking market includes core, metroproducts were well chosen. Increasingly, we also now see opportunities for our products and access equipment used for transport, switching, routing and backhaul in service provider networks. The Enterprise networking market covers Ethernet switching and routing equipment usedtechnology within LANs in small-medium enterprise (“SME”)the IoT, where Gigabit Ethernet-based networks small-medium business (“SMB”), and cloud and security appliances. While both market segments are unique, thereemerging. There is tremendous synergy and cost savings in terms of R&D effort forto provide Ethernet switch and PHY devices allowing us to address these two large markets. Within the Carrier networking segment, our focus and growth is driven

22


products into this emerging adjacent market.
Table of Contents

by mobile backhaul applications, and within the Enterprise networking segment our focus and growth is driven by the migration from 100 Mbps to 1 GE and 10 GE port speeds. In both markets, Vitesse provides unique low power and low cost solutions by optimizing the feature set for target applications.

As with any high technology company, growth opportunities begin with new products. Over the past three years, we introduced over 60 new products, including many new “platform” products and technologies that will serve as the basis for future product development. These new products allowed us to substantially increase our served markets in both Carrier and Enterprise networking.

The next step to generating growth is creating market traction and design wins where we are selected by our customers over our competitors. As we have takenbringing our new products to market, we have seen an increase in our customer engagements and the number of design opportunities that were being identified by our sales team.team have consistently increased since 2010. Early customer adoption of our new products by our customers has exceeded our goals. In the past two years,2013, design wins for our new products increased by approximately 40% from 2012. Our new products have captured design wins at over 200 customers, including market leaders such as Alcatel-Lucent, Cisco, Ericsson, Hewlett Packard, Huawei, Juniper, Samsung, and ZTE. While many of these wins represented additional business at our most important customers, what we recorded over 600call “same-store-sales,” many others are wins at new design wins.

Together withcustomers, and reflect our growing market share. Because our products our highly complex, it takes our customers we are now preparing12 to ramp these new products. In our industry it typically takes six to 2436 months for our customers to go from first product sample receivedavailability to first customer shipment as customers do the necessary development work to complete and qualify their systems in the network. Since it typically takes an additional 12 to 24 months to ramp into full production, we believe design wins represent a good leading indicator of potential future revenues.
In 2012,2013, we shipped samplesintroduced the third-generation of both our switch engine and entered pre-production on the majority of ourPHY products. These new products allowed us to significantly increase our served markets in both Carrier, Enterprise, and we expectIoT networking. We have become the clear choice for meeting our customers to phase into volume production over the course of 2013.customers’ needs for service delivery, synchronization, security, and signal integrity.

In 2012, we began a migration of our revenues to our new product portfolio. In 2011, only 6% ofWe augment our product revenues were from our new product portfolio. In 2012, this grew to 14% of product revenues. We expect revenues from our new products to double in 2013 compared to 2012 and double again in 2014.

Augmenting our product revenues, we leverageby leveraging our substantial intellectual property portfolio to generate revenues. Our primary focus for intellectual property licensing has been our Gigabit Ethernet Copper PHYCuPHY and switch cores and our eFEC technology that wetechnology. We license to non-competing third-parties in adjacent or similar markets.

WeOur accounting policy generally uses the “sell-through” model for sales to our distributors. The “sell-through” model recognizes revenue only upon shipment of the merchandise from our distributor to the final customer. As such, we may have also made progressvariability in our revenue from quarter-to-quarter as customers have substantial flexibility to reschedule backlog with of our distribution partners as part of the terms and conditions of sale. Our distributor sales were 52.7% , 51.6% and 44.6% of product revenue in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In the normal course of business, we regularly assess our product portfolio to ensure it aligns with our strategy. At such time, we may determine to phase-out products and put them through “end-of-life”, or EOL. When we EOL a product, we typically provide up to six months notice for our customers to make a last-time-buy of product and six additional months to take receipt of that product. The EOL announcement can result in near-term increases in our revenues as customers typically respond to these announcements by making last-time-buys to ensure that they have adequate stock on hand to support their production forecast.
During the last three years, we accelerated our strategycomprehensive efforts to strengthenincrease our operational performanceproduct gross margins and execution.operating margins, which together have substantially increased our operating leverage. Our efforts in operations include reduction in materials costs and cycle times, improved product yields, implementation of programs such as lean manufacturing, and an enhanced customer-centric focus. As a fabless semiconductor company, we outsource the majority of our manufacturing. Our successful management of our supply chain has provided us with competitive materials pricing and effective lead times for the materials we purchase. We have sizable advantages due to lower fixed costs, reduced cycle times, and lower inventory resulting from our outsourcing of almost all of our wafer fabrication and assembly. During periods of strong demand, we could experience longer lead times, difficulties in obtaining capacity, and/or difficulty in meeting commitments for our required deliveries during periods of strong demand. Average margins vary widely within the lastmarkets we serve, with the Carrier networking market having the highest average margins and the Enterprise networking market having the lowest average margins. We endeavor to increase margins by providing products that have significant added value relative to our competition.

We have also streamlined our R&D and SG&A organizations, reducing expenses almost 25% over the past three years,fiscal years. We leverage top-level consultants to help us achieve short-term design goals while ensuring we acceleratedmaintain our comprehensive effortin-house engineering talent to reducedrive our operating expenses, which has substantially increased our operating leverage.overall corporate objectives.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

24


Table of Contents


Our accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable in the circumstances. We regularly discuss with our audit committee the basis of our estimates. These estimates could change under different assumptions
or conditions.

We believe that our critical accounting policies and estimates, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 20122013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, are our most critical accounting policies and are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. There have been no significant changes to these policies during the sixthree months endedMarchDecember 31, 2013.


Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information with respect to recent accounting pronouncements and the impact of these pronouncements see “The Company and Its Significant Accounting Policies” footnote in the accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.



23


Table of Contents

Results of Operations for the three and six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, as compared to the three and six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2012

The following table sets forth certain Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the periods indicated.
The percentages in the table are based on net revenues.
Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 2012 2013 20122013 2012
$ % $ % $ % $ %$ % $ %
(in thousands, except for percentages)(in thousands, except for percentages)
Net revenues: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
  
Product revenues$24,689
 99.7 % $27,195
 91.5 % $48,594
 96.3 % $56,137
 94.0 %$24,863
 91.8 % $23,905
 92.9 %
Intellectual property revenues64
 0.3 % 2,542
 8.5 % 1,886
 3.7 % 3,591
 6.0 %2,220
 8.2 % 1,822
 7.1 %
Net revenues24,753
 100.0 % 29,737
 100.0 % 50,480
 100.0 % 59,728
 100.0 %27,083
 100.0 % 25,727
 100.0 %
Costs and expenses: 
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
  
    
Cost of product revenues11,369
 45.9 % 10,595
 35.6 % 22,344
 44.3 % 22,758
 38.1 %10,676
 39.4 % 10,975
 42.7 %
Engineering, research and development9,777
 39.5 % 9,580
 32.2 % 20,281
 40.2 % 22,005
 36.8 %10,679
 39.4 % 10,504
 40.8 %
Selling, general and administrative7,390
 29.9 % 8,383
 28.2 % 15,360
 30.4 % 15,835
 26.6 %7,854
 29.0 % 7,970
 30.9 %
Amortization of intangible assets89
 0.4 % 79
 0.3 % 186
 0.4 % 146
 0.2 %88
 0.3 % 97
 0.4 %
Costs and expenses28,625
 115.7 % 28,637
 96.3 % 58,171
 115.3 % 60,744
 101.7 %29,297
 108.1 % 29,546
 114.8 %
(Loss) income from operations(3,872) (15.7)% 1,100
 3.7 % (7,691) (15.3)% (1,016) (1.7)%
Loss from operations(2,214) (8.1)% (3,819) (14.8)%
Other expense (income): 
  
  
  
  
  
    
 
  
    
Interest expense, net1,966
 7.9 % 1,924
 6.5 % 3,936
 7.8 % 3,873
 6.5 %1,704
 6.3 % 1,970
 7.7 %
(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative
  % 5,280
 17.8 % (803) (1.6)% 1,982
 3.3 %
Gain on compound embedded derivative
  % (803) (3.1)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt1,594
 5.9 % 
  %
Other expense (income), net5
  % 29
 0.1 % (26) (0.1)% 41
 0.1 %61
 0.2 % (31) (0.1)%
Other expense, net1,971
 7.9 % 7,233
 24.4 % 3,107
 6.1 % 5,896
 9.9 %3,359
 12.4 % 1,136
 4.5 %
Loss before income tax (benefit) expense(5,843) (23.6)% (6,133) (20.7)% (10,798) (21.4)% (6,912) (11.6)%
Income tax (benefit) expense(996) (4.0)% 63
 0.2 % (919) (1.8)% 129
 0.2 %
Loss before income tax (benefit) provision(5,573) (20.5)% (4,955) (19.3)%
Income tax (benefit) provision(202) (0.7)% 77
 0.3 %
Net loss$(4,847) (19.6)% $(6,196) (20.9)% $(9,879) (19.6)% $(7,041) (11.8)%$(5,371) (19.8)% $(5,032) (19.6)%

Product Revenues


25


Table of Contents

We sell our products into the following markets: (i) Carrier networking; (ii) Enterprise networking; and (iii) Non-core. The Carrier networking market includes core, metro, edge, and access equipment used for transport, switching, routing, mobile access, and backhaul in service provider networks. The Enterprise networking market covers Ethernet switching and routing equipment used within LANs in SME and SMB networks and cloud accessCloud Access services. The Non-core market is comprised of products that have not received additional investment over the last five years and, as a result, have generally been in decline.

The demand for our products is affected by various factors, including our development and introduction of new products, availability and pricing of competing products, capacity constraints at our suppliers, end-of-life (“EOL”)EOL product decisions, and general economic conditions. Therefore, our revenues for the three and six months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013 and 2012, may not necessarily be indicative of future revenues.


24


Table of Contents

Product revenues by market are as follows:
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
Carrier networking$13,151
 53.3% $9,597
 35.3% $3,554
 37.0 %
Enterprise networking10,857
 44.0% 13,148
 48.3% (2,291) (17.4)%
Non-core681
 2.7% 4,450
 16.4% (3,769) (84.7)%
Product revenues$24,689
 100.0% $27,195
 100.0% $(2,506) (9.2)%

Six Months Ended March 31,    Three Months Ended December 31,    
2013 2012    2013 2012    
Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
(in thousands, except percentages)  (in thousands, except percentages)  
Carrier networking$27,129
 55.8% $21,589
 38.5% $5,540
 25.7 %$12,939
 52.1% $13,978
 58.5% $(1,039) (7.4)%
Enterprise networking20,516
 42.2% 27,575
 49.1% (7,059) (25.6)%11,767
 47.3% 9,659
 40.4% 2,108
 21.8 %
Non-core949
 2.0% 6,973
 12.4% (6,024) (86.4)%157
 0.6% 268
 1.1% (111) (41.4)%
Product revenues$48,594
 100.0% $56,137
 100.0% $(7,543) (13.4)%$24,863
 100.0% $23,905
 100.0% $958
 4.0 %
           

The increase inlower Carrier networking revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year is largely attributable to a tripling in sales of our new products, particularly our switches, and 1 Gigabit and 10 Gigabit PHYs for Carrier Ethernet applications. We also saw an increase in revenues from our framers going through EOL. Increases were partially offset by declines in some of our SONET-based product revenues. The increase in Carrier networking revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year is due to strong new product revenues and sales of framers going through EOL, partially offset by lower revenues from switch fabric products that had gone through EOL in the prior year and other mature products.

The decrease in Enterprise networking revenues in the three and six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same periods in the prior year, was due to lower revenues from switch fabric products that had gone through EOL in the prior year. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in new Enterprise Ethernet switch product revenues.

The decrease in Non-core revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year, is largely attributable to a decrease in sales of some of our mature Fibre Channel products,crosspoint switches and SONET framers, which had a large purchase by a single customerwent through EOL in the prior year. In addition toperiod. Partially offsetting the lower Fibre Channel revenues, the decreasedecreases is an increase in Non-Core revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year is attributable to a decreasesales of legacy network processing unit (“NPU”)our new Connectivity products, which had high EOLmore than doubled.

The higher Enterprise networking revenues is primarily due to increases in the prior year.sales of our new switches and a five-fold increase in sales of our new 10G Ethernet PHYs.

In fiscal 2012, a number of older products went through EOL. Revenues from these EOL products totaled $4.3$3.4 million and $5.9$4.5 million in the three months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $8.8 million and $13.4 million in the six months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Product phase-outs are part of our normal course of business, and we will continue this practice in the future. We expect revenues from EOL products to decline in this fiscal year. From time-to-time, upon customer request or due to a change in our product strategy, we may decide to resume producing a part we previously phased-out.


25


Table of Contents

We also classify our product revenues based on our three product lines: (i) Connectivity; (ii) Ethernet switching; and (iii) Transport processing.

Product revenues by product line are as follows:
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
Connectivity$9,835
 39.8% $14,704
 54.1% $(4,869) (33.1)%
Ethernet switching10,331
 41.9% 6,777
 24.9% 3,554
 52.4 %
Transport processing4,523
 18.3% 5,714
 21.0% (1,191) (20.8)%
Product revenues$24,689
 100.0% $27,195
 100.0% $(2,506) (9.2)%

Six Months Ended March 31,    Three Months Ended December 31,    
2013 2012    2013 2012    
Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
(in thousands, except percentages)  (in thousands, except percentages)  
Connectivity$19,973
 41.1% $27,672
 49.3% $(7,699) (27.8)%$8,949
 36.0% $10,138
 42.5% $(1,189) (11.7)%
Ethernet switching18,637
 38.4% 14,800
 26.4% 3,837
 25.9 %11,336
 45.6% 8,306
 34.7% 3,030
 36.5 %
Transport processing9,984
 20.5% 13,665
 24.3% (3,681) (26.9)%4,578
 18.4% 5,461
 22.8% (883) (16.2)%
Product revenues$48,594
 100.0% $56,137
 100.0% $(7,543) (13.4)%$24,863
 100.0% $23,905
 100.0% $958
 4.0 %
           

The decrease inlower Connectivity revenues in the three months and six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year, is largely attributable to the decrease in products for Fibre Channel applications, which had a large purchase by a single customer in the prior period, and to a decrease in some of our mature SONET-based products.crosspoint switches, partially offset by a five-fold increase in sales of our new 10G Ethernet PHYs.

The increase inhigher Ethernet switching revenues in the three and six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year, is largely attributable to our new switches selling into both the Carrier and Enterprise networking market. Thean increase was partially offset by a decrease in sales of our othernew switches and new and mature products.1GbE copper PHYs.


26


Table of Contents

The decrease inlower Transport processing revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year, is largely attributable to lowerdecreased sales of switch fabrics goingSONET framers that went through EOL. TheEOL in the prior period. This decrease wasis partially offset by increased sales of framers going through EOL. The decreasegrowth in Transport processing revenues in the six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year is attributable to lower sales of switch fabrics, NPUs, and optical transport network products going through EOL, offset by increased sales of framers going through EOL.

our OTN mappers.

Intellectual Property Revenues
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Intellectual property revenues$64
 0.3% $2,542
 8.5% $(2,478) (97.5)%

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Intellectual property revenues$1,886
 3.7% $3,591
 6.0% $(1,705) (47.5)%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Intellectual property revenues$2,220
 8.2% $1,822
 7.1% $398
 21.8%
            


26


Table of Contents

Intellectual property revenues decreased in the threeinclude licenses, royalties, and six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year,sales of patents. The higher intellectual property revenues is due to a decrease inincreased deliveries of intellectual property. The timing and amounts of intellectual property revenues fluctuate and tend to be unpredictable. Costsfluctuate. Expenses associated with the sale of intellectual property are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.SG&A.

Net revenues from customers that were equal to or greater than 10% of total net revenues are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, Six Months Ended March 31,
2013 2012 2013 2012Three Months Ended December 31,



 

 

 

2013 2012
WPG Holdings**16.7% 14.0% 14.9% 12.2%18.4% 13.2%
Nu Horizons Electronics**11.1% 10.3% 11.7% 16.2%*
 12.3%
Harris Corporation*
 10.8% *
 *
Huawei*
 11.0%
 

*Less than 10% of total net revenues for period indicated.
**Distributors

Net revenues by geographic area are as follows:
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2013 2012
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 (in thousands, except percentages)
United States$7,198
 29.1% $13,279
 44.7%
Asia Pacific14,037
 56.7% 12,823
 43.1%
EMEA*3,518
 14.2% 3,635
 12.2%
Net revenues$24,753
 100.0% $29,737
 100.0%
 

 Six Months Ended March 31,
 2013 2012
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 (in thousands, except percentages)
United States$18,103
 35.9% $22,998
 38.5%
Asia Pacific26,101
 51.7% 27,952
 46.8%
EMEA*6,276
 12.4% 8,778
 14.7%
Net revenues$50,480
 100.0% $59,728
 100.0%

*Europe, Middle East and Africa
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
United States$6,559
 24.2% $10,905
 42.4% $(4,346) (39.9)%
Asia Pacific16,786
 62.0% 12,064
 46.9% 4,722
 39.1 %
Europe, Middle East and Africa3,738
 13.8% 2,758
 10.7% 980
 35.5 %
Net revenues$27,083
 100.0% $25,727
 100.0% $1,356
 5.3 %
            

Revenues by geographic area are based upon the country of billing. The geographic location of distributors and third-party manufacturing service providers may be different from the geographic location of the ultimate end users. We believe a substantial portion of the products billed to OEMs and third-party manufacturing service providers in the Asia Pacific region are ultimately shipped to end-markets in the United States and Europe.

Cost of Product Revenues
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Cost of product revenues$11,369
 46.0% $10,595
 39.0% $774
 7.3%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Cost of product revenues$10,676
 42.9% $10,975
 45.9% $(299) (2.7)%
            


27


Table of Contents

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Product
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Cost of product revenues$22,344
 46.0% $22,758
 40.5% $(414) (1.8)%

We use third-parties for wafer fabrication as well as test and assembly services. Cost of product revenues consists predominantly of: (i) purchased finished wafers; (ii) assembly services; (iii) test services; and (iv) labor and overhead costs associated with product procurement, planning and quality assurance.

Our cost of product revenues is affected by various factors, including product mix, volume, and provisions for excess and obsolete inventories, material costs, manufacturing efficiencies, and the position of our products within their life-cycles. Our cost of product revenues as a percentage of net product revenues is affected by these factors, as well as customer mix, volume, pricing, and competitive pricing programs.

The overall increasedecrease in cost of product revenues as a percentage of product revenues is due toresulted from an increase in switching products sales that have a mix shift toward new products and lower margin Enterprise Ethernet switches and away from Fibre Channel, NPU and switch fabrics products, going through EOL, which have higher gross margins. New products typically start out with higher costsunit cost as a percentage of revenues which decrease with increased volumes and improved manufacturing efficiencies.as compared to the prior period.

Engineering, Research and Development
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Engineering, research and development$9,777
 39.5% $9,580
 32.2% $197
 2.1%

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Engineering, research and development$20,281
 40.2% $22,005
 36.8% $(1,724) (7.8)%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Engineering, research and development$10,679
 39.4% $10,504
 40.8% $175
 1.7%
            

R&D expenses consist primarily of compensation expenses for employees and contractors engaged in research, design and development activities. R&D also includes costs of mask sets,tooling, which we fully expense in the period, and electronic design automation (“EDA”) tools, software licensing contracts, subcontracting and fabrication costs, depreciation and amortization, and
overhead including facilities expenses.

The level of R&D expenseexpenses will vary from period-to-period, depending on timing of development projects and the purchase of masks aligned to those projects. The level of R&D expenseexpenses as a percentage of net revenues will vary, depending, in part, on the level of net revenues. Our R&D efforts are critical to maintaining a high level of new product introductions and are critical to our plans for future growth.

R&D expense inspending for the three months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, is comparable to the same period in the prior year.

The decrease in R&D expense in the six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same periodconsistent with spending in the prior year is primarily attributable to $1.3 million lower spending for masks and test wafers.period.

We continue to concentrate our spending in R&D to meet customer requirements and to respond to market conditions, and we do not anticipate that the reduction in R&D spending in the current year will impact product development.


28


Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Selling, general and administrative$7,390
 29.9% $8,383
 28.2% $(993) (11.8)%

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Selling, general and administrative$15,360
 30.4% $15,835
 26.6% $(475) (3.0)%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Selling, general and administrative$7,854
 29.0% $7,970
 30.9% $(116) (1.5)%
            

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense consists&A expenses consist primarily of compensation expense, legal and other professional fees, facilities expenses, outside labor, and communication expenses.

The decrease in SG&A expense in the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year,expenses is primarily due to a $0.7 million intangible asset write-down in the prior year.

The decrease in SG&A expense in the six months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in the prior year, is primarily due to lower personnel related expenses of $0.6 million and a $0.7 million intangible asset write-down in the prior year, partially offset by a $0.5 million increase in asset retirement obligations expense as we moveexpenses incurred in 2012 resulting from moving from our primary Camarillo facility to an adjacent building.building, partially offset by increased spending to move our primary test operation from Singapore to Taiwan in 2013.


28


Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Interest expense, net$1,966
 7.9% $1,924
 6.5% $42
 2.2%

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Interest expense, net$3,936
 7.8% $3,873
 6.5% $63
 1.6%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)    
Interest expense, net$1,704
 6.3% $1,970
 7.7% $(266) (13.5)%
            

The change in the  income tax (benefit)Interest expense, for the threenet is comprised of cash interest expense, amortization of debt discount, premium, and six months ended March 31, 2013, wasdebt issuance cost, net of interest income. Interest expense, net decreased primarily due to a refundthe repurchase in November 2013 of withholding taxes previously paid on certain foreign income.

$13.7 million principal amount of our 2014 Debentures.

Gain on Compound Embedded Derivative
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Loss on compound embedded derivative$
 % $5,280
 17.8% $(5,280) (100.0)%


29


Table of Contents

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
(Gain) loss on compound embedded derivative$(803) (1.6)% $1,982
 3.3% $(2,785) (140.5)%

The gain on our compound embedded derivative included in our 2014 Debentures for the six months ended March 31, 2013, is primarily generated by the decrease in the price of our underlying common stock during those periods.
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Gain on compound embedded derivative$
 % $(803) (3.1)% $803
 (100.0)%
            

The compound embedded derivative included in our 2014 Debentures required bifurcation and accounting at fair value because the economic and contractual characteristics of the compound embedded derivative met the criteria for bifurcation and separate accounting due to the conversion price not being indexed to our own stock. The compound embedded derivative is comprised of the conversion option and a make-whole payment for foregone interest if the holder converts the debenture early. The make-whole payment for foregone interest expired October 30, 2012, and upon its expiration, the compound embedded derivative no longer met the criteria for bifurcation as all components of the conversion feature were indexed to our own stock. A final valuation was completed on October 30, 2012, resulting in gain of $0.8 million due to the change in fair value.

Income Tax (Benefit) ExpenseLoss on Extinguishment of Debt
 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Income tax (benefit) expense$(996) (4.0)% $63
 0.2% $(1,059) (1,681.0)%

 Six Months Ended March 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Income tax (benefit) expense$(919) (1.8)% $129
 0.2% $(1,048) (812.4)%
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Loss on extinguishment of debt$1,594
 5.9% $
 % $1,594
 100.0%
            

The loss on extinguishment of debt is due to the repurchase in November 2013 of $13.7 million principal amount of our 2014 Debentures at 107% of the principal amount thereof.


29


Table of Contents

Income Tax Benefit
 Three Months Ended December 31,    
 2013 2012    
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Amount 
% of Net
 Revenues
 Change 
%
Change
 (in thousands, except percentages)  
  
Income tax (benefit) provision$(202) (0.7)% $77
 0.3% $(279) (362.3)%
            

Our effective tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2013 was 8.5%. Our effective tax rate is primarily impacted by certain foreign taxes, certain nondeductible interest and share based expenses and the release of a portion of the valuationevaluation allowance related to certain foreign jurisdictions’ deferred tax assets as such balancesbalance were more likely than not realizable within the applicable carryforward period. Our effective tax rate for the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 20122013 was (1.9)(3.6)%, which was lower than the federal and state statutory rate due to the projected federal and state losses for the fiscal year.year as well as the related valuation allowances.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Cash Flow Analysis

Cash increaseddecreased to $36.948.4 million at MarchDecember 31, 2013, from $23.968.9 million at September 30, 20122013. During the six months ended March 31, 2013, we used cash for operations and investing activities, which was offset by cash provided by financing activities. Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities are summarized as follows:

30


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended March 31,Three Months Ended December 31,
2013 20122013 2012
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities$(3,238) $3,464
Net cash used in operating activities$(4,523) $(3,608)
Net cash used in investing activities(412) (946)(788) (161)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities16,673
 (624)
Net increase in cash13,023
 1,894
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities(15,197) 16,956
Net (decrease) increase in cash(20,508) 13,187
Cash at beginning of period23,891
 17,318
68,863
 23,891
Cash at end of period$36,914
 $19,212
$48,355
 $37,078

Net Cash (Used In) Provided byUsed In Operating Activities

During the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, cash used in operations totaled $3.24.5 million. Excluding changes in working capital, we used $5.21.6 million to fund the cash portion of our net loss. We also used cash to fund increases in accounts receivable, inventory and prepaid expenses and other assets totaling $1.14.6 million. We also used cash to paydown accrued expenses and other liabilities of $0.9 million. These uses were offset by lower accounts receivable of $1.0 million and higher deferred revenue, accounts payable and accrued expense liabilitiesdeferred revenue totaling $2.1$2.5 million.

Accounts receivable decreased $1.0increased $1.6 million from $9.4$9.8 million at September 30, 20122013, to $8.4$11.4 million at MarchDecember 31, 2013, primarily due to improved cash collectionsthe timing of sales during the quarter ended MarchDecember 31, 2013.2013. Inventory levels were increased $0.51.9 million to $12.5 million at December 31, 2013, from $12.110.7 million at September 30, 2012, to $12.6 million2013 at March 31, 2013, primarily due to meet increased inventories held by distributors.demand. Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities increased by $0.9$1.1 million, from $18.520.1 million at September 30, 20122013, to $19.421.2 million at MarchDecember 31, 2013, due to the timing of obligations and/or payments to our vendors and other service providers. Deferred revenue increased $1.10.5 million from $0.92.2 million at September 30, 2012,2013, to $2.02.7 million at MarchDecember 31, 2013, due to increased shipments tothe timing of payments from distributors.

During the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2012, cash provided by operating activitiesused in operations totaled $3.53.6 million. Excluding changes in working capital, cashwe used $3.3 million to fund the cash portion of our losses totaled $1.4 million.net loss. We also used $0.7 millioncash to fund the increaseincreases in accounts receivable, inventory, and $0.7 million related to a decrease in deferred revenue due to lower purchases from distributors and $0.5 million related to decreased accounts payable, accruedprepaid expenses and other liabilities.totaling $1.6 million. These uses were offset by the generation of $4.0 million cash from operating with lower inventory levels.higher deferred revenues, accounts payable and accrued expense liabilities totaling $1.3 million.

Accounts receivableInventory increased $0.7$0.5 million from $9.6$12.1 million at September 30, 2011,2012 to $10.3$12.6 million at MarchDecember 31, 2012, resulting from timing of sales. Inventory decreased $4.0 million from $20.9 million at September 30, 2011, to $16.9 million at March 31, 2012. The lower inventory is primarily due to decreased purchasing resulting from positive changes in the availability of materials.increased inventories held by distributors. Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities increased by $0.5$0.9 million from $21.6$18.5 million at September 30, 2011,2012 to $21.1$19.4 million at MarchDecember 31, 2012, due to a reduction in purchases from our suppliers as industry-wide material shortages eased, as well as the timing of obligations and/

30



or payments to our vendors and other service providers. Deferred revenue increased $0.4 million from $0.9 million at September 30, 2012 to $1.3 million at December 31, 2012 due to increased shipments to distributors.

Net Cash Used In Investing Activities

Investing activities used cash in the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, for capital expenditures of $0.5$0.9 million and payments under licensing agreements of $0.1 million. Expenditures were partially offset by cash provided by the sale of capital assets of $0.2 million. Investing activities used cash in the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2012, for capital expenditures of $0.3 million and payments under licensing agreements of $0.70.2 million.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Provided By Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities during the three months ended December 31, 2013, totaled $15.2 million. Cash used for the repurchase of our 2014 Debentures totaled $14.6 million. We also used cash to pay a consent fee of $0.3 million related to the November 2013 amendment of our credit agreement. Cash used for the repurchase of restricted stock units for payroll taxes on behalf of employees was $0.3 million. Net cash provided by financing activities during the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013,2012 totaled $16.7 million.$17.0 million. Cash from the sale of common stock totaled $17.1$17.2 million, net of approximately $1.5$1.4 million in expenses, from the registered underwritten sale of 10,651,280 shares of common stock at $1.75 per share, based on a negotiated discount to market. Offering costs of $0.1 million were incurred, but unpaid as of December 31, 2012. Proceeds were offset by $0.4$0.3 million in cash used for the repurchase of restricted stock units for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees. During the six months ended March 31, 2012, financing activities used $0.6 million in cash primarily for the repurchase of restricted stock units for payroll taxes.



31


Table of Contents

Capital Resources, including Long-TermIncluding Debt, Contingent Liabilities and Operating Leases

Prospective Capital Needs

Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash generated from product sales, and cash generated from the sales or licensing of our intellectual property, and during the six months endedMarch 31, 2013, cash generated from the sale of our common stock.property. Our cash totaled $36.948.4 million at MarchDecember 31, 2013. Our working capital at MarchDecember 31, 2013, was $31.920.0 million.

In order to achieve sustained profitability and positive cash flows from operations, we may need to further reduce operating expenses and/or increase revenues. We have completed a series of cost reduction actions that have improved our operating expense structure. We will continue to perform additional actions, as necessary. Our ability to maintain, or increase, current revenue levels to sustain profitability will depend, in part, on demand for our products.

Our current debt is comprised of our convertible subordinated debentures (“2014 Debentures”), of which the total principal amount of $32.8 million is due in October 2014. Our long-term debt is comprised of our senior term loans (the “Term A Loan” and “Term B Loan”, which we collectively refer to as our “Term A and B Loans”) which have a total principal amount of $17.2 million due on August 31, 2016. We intend to use our existing cash to repay our 2014 Debentures on or before their maturity in October 2014, which will achieve our objective of reducing our outstanding indebtedness but will also reduce our cash balances. While we believe that our existing cash,sources of liquidity, along with cash expected to be generated from product sales and the sale or licensing of our intellectual property, and the careful management of working capital requirements,revenues, will be sufficient to fund our operations and R&D efforts, anticipated capital expenditures, working capital, and other financing requirements for at least the next 12 months. In order to increase our working capital,months after repayment of the 2014 Debentures, this ultimately may not be the case. If we incur operating losses and negative cash flows in the future, we may seekneed to further reduce our operating costs or obtain alternate sources of financing, or both. We may need additional debt or equity financing. However, we cannot assure you that such financing will be availablecapital in the future and may not have access to usadditional sources of capital on favorable terms or at all, particularly in lightall. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of recent economic conditions in the capital markets.

Our short-termequity or debt is comprisedsecurities, such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our Term A Loan, of which the total principal amount of $7.9 million is due in February 2014. Our long term debt is comprised of our Term B Loancommon stock and our 2014 Debentures,stockholders may experience dilution of which the total principal amount of
$55.8 million is due in October 2014. We currently anticipate that cash on hand and cash provided by operating activities will permit us to pay the amount due in February 2014 and a portion of the amount due in October 2014. To meet the remaining debt obligation due in October 2014, we have been exploring strategic alternatives to repaying this debt, and have engaged the services of financial advisory firms to assist us in evaluating possible strategic and financing transactions. These transactions include, among others that we may consider from time to time, an extension of the maturity date and other modification of our Term A and B Loans, the refinancing of indebtedness from the proceeds of one or more new credit facilities, and the repayment of indebtedness from sales of assets and financing transactions. We will pursue these and other potential transactions until we provide for the repayment, refinancing and/or restructuring of our indebtedness.their ownership interests. There can be no assurance, however, that our efforts will be successful.

We have a Form S-3 universal shelf registration statement on file with the SEC. The universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 permits Vitesse to sell, in one or more public offerings, shares of our common stock, shares of preferred stock or debt securities, or any combination of such securities, for proceeds in an aggregate amount of up to $75.0 million. As ofThe Form S-3 will expire in January 2017. March 31, 2013, we raised a total of $18.6 million in gross proceeds from the sale of 10,651,280 shares of our common stock, leaving approximately $56.4 million availableTo date, no securities have been issued pursuant to the Form S-3. The Form S-3 expires on December 27, 2014.registration statement.


31


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
Payment Obligations by Fiscal YearPayment Obligations by Fiscal Year
Remaining
in 2013
 2014-2015 2016-2017 2018 and
thereafter
 TotalRemaining
in 2014
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 and Thereafter Total
(in thousands)(in thousands)
Convertible subordinated debt (1)$
 $46,493
 $
 $
 $46,493
$
 $32,843
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $32,843
Term A Loan (2)
 7,857
 
 
 7,857

 
 7,857
 
 
 
 7,857
Term B Loan (3)
 9,342
 
 
 9,342

 
 9,342
 
 
 
 9,342
Loan interest (4)2,650
 7,332
 
 
 9,982
2,489
 3,102
 1,776
 
 
 
 7,367
Operating leases (5)1,620
 3,143
 199
 
 4,962
1,639
 1,568
 343
 
 
 
 3,550
Software licenses (6)5,108
 14,278
 5,600
 2,800
 27,786
5,346
 6,736
 2,847
 2,800
 2,800
 
 20,529
Inventory and related purchase obligations (7)7,331
 560
 
 
 7,891
5,560
 1,233
 60
 60
 
 
 6,913
Total$16,709
 $89,005
 $5,799
 $2,800
 $114,313
$15,034
 $45,482
 $22,225
 $2,860
 $2,800
 $
 $88,401

(1)Convertible subordinated debt represents amounts due for our 8.0% convertible debentures due October 2014.

(2)Term A Loan represents amounts due for our 10.5%9.0% fixed rate senior notes due February 2014.August 31, 2016.

(3)Term B Loan represents amounts due for our 8.0%9.0% fixed rate senior notes due October 2014.August 31, 2016.


32


Table of Contents

(4)Interest payable for 2014 Debentures through 2015 and Term A Loans, Termand B Loans and convertible subordinated debt through October 2014.2016.

(5)We lease facilities under non-cancellable operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2016.

(6)Software license commitments represent non-cancellable licenses of technology from third-parties used in the development of our products.

(7)
Inventory and relatedother purchase obligations represent non-cancellable purchase commitments for wafers and substrate parts.commitments. For purposes of the table above, inventory and relatedother purchase obligations are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms. Our purchase orders are based on our current manufacturing needs and are typically fulfilled by our vendors within a relatively short time.Other purchase commitments may be for longer periods and are dictated by contractual terms.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At MarchDecember 31, 2013, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases.


3332


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 20122013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.. There have been no material changes to these risks during the sixthree months ended MarchDecember 31, 2013.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated as of MarchDecember 31, 2013, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of MarchDecember 31, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, during the quarter ended MarchDecember 31, 2013, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitation on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our disclosure controls and procedures provide our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer reasonable assurances that our disclosure controls and procedures will achieve their objectives. However, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting can or will prevent all human error. A control system, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Furthermore, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are internal resource constraints, and the benefit of controls must be weighed relative to their corresponding costs. Because of the limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide complete assurance that all control issues and instances of error, if any, within the Company are detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur due to human error or mistake. Additionally, controls, no matter how well designed, could be circumvented by the individual acts of specific persons within the organization. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated objectives under all potential future conditions.



3433


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time-to-time in our normal course of business, we are a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be determined, management believes that, as of MarchDecember 31, 2013, the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 20122013, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A..

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit   Incorporated by Reference Filed or Furnished
Number Exhibit Description Form File Number Exhibit Filing Date Herewith
10.1*†Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation Fiscal Year 2014 Executive Bonus Plan, dated as of December 23, 2013.X
31.1 Certification of Principal Executive officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
31.2 Certification of Principal Financial officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
32.1 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.         X
101.INS XBRL Instance Document**         X
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**         X
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**         X
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**         X
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**         X
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**         X


*A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**XBRL information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.


Certain portions of this agreement have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for an order granting confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


3534


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

May 7, 2013February 4, 2014VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
   
   
 By:/s/ CHRISTOPHER R. GARDNER
  Christopher R. Gardner
  Chief Executive Officer
   
May 7, 2013February 4, 2014VITESSE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
   
   
 By:/s/ MARTIN S. MCDERMUT
  Martin S. McDermut
  Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



3635